{"meta":{"query_hash":"38074cb16072","filters":{"topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations"},"cohort_total":2175,"direct_labels_cover":6,"predictions_cover":2175,"exported":2175,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/38074cb16072","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Legal+Education+and+Practice+Innovations"},"results":[{"id":"W1005736418","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511547348.018","title":"Definitions of Professionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.24684056149079855,"score_gpt":0.45679785578788,"score_spread":0.20995729429708146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1005736418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001384552,0.00012426224,0.000034525085,0.013791823,0.0005863841,0.000108520006,0.00002007663,0.00008151965,0.9852515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00077337807,0.0019388737,0.0016167397,0.00058838824,0.00021610018,0.000014674195,0.000033354347,0.00003984823,0.99477863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951226,0.00007288709,0.000098636025,0.00006246345,0.00018650483,0.000067240246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995571,0.00009920474,0.00014454972,0.0000939461,0.00008291022,0.000022284616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010128396,0.000041303356,0.00006966592,0.0001329098,0.0001353426,0.000008902029,0.00009012208,0.0001363529,0.06171681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028563553,0.000037393012,0.000026216001,0.00029108638,0.00015955987,0.00005973648,0.0000072403063,0.00013732172,0.00040865416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.1245935e-7,0.000025208217,0.000009370795,0.000002159137,0.000003888473,8.590851e-8,0.00093071273,3.442173e-9,3.3692845e-7,0.47160402,0.5273294,0.00009471074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002582828,0.0000014252274,0.000024987812,0.000024971241,0.0000045588276,2.6653947e-7,0.0013098457,2.8287998e-8,0.0000015848871,0.0034556196,0.99510455,0.000046305006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01500105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029477342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46814838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001382144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012501017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99155813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W100704594","doi":"10.29173/alr340","title":"Regulating Lawyer Competence and Quality of Service","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alzheimer Society of Canada; Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Enforcement; Practice of law; Legal ethics; Legal practice; Law; Legal profession; Political science; Law enforcement; Legal education; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.16945317191154263,"score_gpt":0.4322030235899938,"score_spread":0.26274985167845116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W100704594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056524906,0.013259321,0.000007755261,0.18170463,0.00016311211,0.00037457756,0.000002052961,0.000020743963,0.7479429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9536065,0.013640882,0.0010423298,0.028596867,0.00006621556,0.000012987078,0.000006096394,0.000005260416,0.0030228985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910766,0.00026867364,0.0002787398,0.00009689547,0.00016027523,0.00008777852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986139,0.0007635346,0.00019722639,0.0001490965,0.00023011248,0.000046129324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007666854,0.000044626602,0.0001576326,0.000008152684,0.00033320836,0.00001383876,0.000097318705,0.000025500032,0.0003555954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011276543,0.00004062957,0.000022966804,0.00041858995,0.00016915658,0.00036606012,0.00001808009,0.00008453779,0.00003702676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.155138e-7,0.000018579527,0.001834179,0.00035857054,0.0000046997484,5.5802804e-8,0.0026127195,7.020194e-8,0.000027974103,0.9936255,0.0007610458,0.00075587275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046620207,0.0000033616543,0.00470744,0.00039608582,0.00001224282,0.0000022783827,0.00017824883,0.0000011852928,0.000014891114,0.00038971842,0.99418217,0.000065763146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19065356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06925735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99342114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010728958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016619237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94772625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1011537451","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: Andrew Pineau's \"The abuses of argument: Understanding fallacies on Toulmin's layout of argument","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.06615253610836386,"score_gpt":0.2988894365209529,"score_spread":0.23273690041258904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1011537451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87660885,0.000045907833,0.00004891747,0.093193695,0.00028888142,0.0004447974,0.000039698443,0.000025733212,0.029303541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99507874,0.00006771281,0.00019555468,0.0019956091,0.00007079186,0.000001210087,0.00001752091,0.000009566334,0.002563306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981297,0.00037927655,0.00026137911,0.00022849682,0.00073024904,0.00027087057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981651,0.0006200591,0.00048057776,0.00036704764,0.00024805713,0.000119168966],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009606033,0.00014742893,0.0002509516,0.00025838753,0.0009781385,0.000066231725,0.0005949897,0.0001301851,0.0024827467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023943973,0.00014507496,0.00013476812,0.00068741513,0.00067664613,0.0010835076,0.00010115172,0.0004217169,0.00009095917],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009127394,0.0027949512,0.25104067,0.00026581524,0.00091203465,0.000011025644,0.26576757,0.0002600824,0.007045586,0.33286437,0.13496976,0.003155403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033060438,0.0010166479,0.1982209,0.00058719394,0.00031183154,0.000002916593,0.49164993,0.000028667811,0.006803419,0.013548877,0.28371707,0.000806507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003902965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015109158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3193155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037373567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019045528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1013622494","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Copyright","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Intellectual property; Sociology","score_opus":0.1734231972596694,"score_gpt":0.4698197089103487,"score_spread":0.29639651165067926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1013622494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015631116,0.0006856645,9.839655e-7,0.077602886,0.0014964832,0.0003384177,0.000063248495,0.000035663394,0.91962034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03203971,0.0013259741,0.00032643686,0.0074840495,0.0014278601,0.000091454036,0.00024926045,0.00002970932,0.9570255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969827,0.00066765,0.00042085035,0.00035826303,0.0006750866,0.00089544617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978545,0.0005548007,0.000107809305,0.00034063915,0.0006911213,0.000451171],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035455008,0.00015517136,0.00021044942,0.00065945095,0.001247887,0.00064288714,0.00085038424,0.0006005373,0.02445293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013259049,0.0001475508,0.000044457633,0.0013182879,0.0006860129,0.0006756304,0.000043611504,0.0015243946,0.0014696578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.181212e-7,0.000029511102,0.00026064724,0.0000064566475,0.000005576696,0.0000024635872,0.006853227,2.3861269e-8,2.6878686e-7,0.41835293,0.5741222,0.0003659634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000512657,0.00001689276,0.000028992361,0.000045438996,0.0000054198217,4.09316e-7,0.014424755,4.949576e-7,0.00001473861,0.0054659396,0.97975487,0.00019076427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99924624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.412887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008186474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010715822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W10239059","doi":"","title":"Obtaining Official Documents from Curtin University - Curtin University Sydney","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02580221090486229,"score_gpt":0.3097956573561564,"score_spread":0.2839934464512941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10239059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8274008,0.00004073886,0.00014571892,0.11168473,0.0023748267,0.00010910927,0.000028851417,0.000013459092,0.058201782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966191,0.000025037916,0.00012879007,0.00073083333,0.0007189039,3.949819e-8,0.0000035480239,0.0000054370657,0.001768276],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988192,0.00044254164,0.00016273622,0.00008613971,0.00024027016,0.0002491285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849516,0.000245724,0.00034067978,0.000095885676,0.0003540322,0.00046849612],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009818142,0.00007311319,0.000100953635,0.0001443625,0.0014787897,0.00017953366,0.00057518895,0.000034346867,0.0012080884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007273118,0.000070320566,0.00006932459,0.00045733454,0.00025578245,0.0010491294,0.000017247794,0.0005042793,0.00007036035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026672697,0.00029023364,0.11361035,0.000007678281,0.0005014134,0.00028436072,0.22646879,0.00029504008,0.000106885054,0.29705077,0.32436672,0.03675105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004500855,0.00003366309,0.0044072014,0.000012388531,0.000059528116,0.0000010084055,0.012713411,0.000031162916,0.00001994035,0.0011221125,0.9810505,0.0000990284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3870118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1484809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65668374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004922338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045123147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1029958129","doi":"10.2753/pin1099-9922120203","title":"The Road to Disclosure Legislation in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba; Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil servants; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Safeguard; Public administration; Law; Political science; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.03947168854435506,"score_gpt":0.35063238943038094,"score_spread":0.3111607008860259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1029958129","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3154103,0.000003771428,0.0000209941,0.49835378,0.0017701113,0.00011907776,0.0000030448177,0.0000121339435,0.18430682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995515,0.0000029396253,0.00009936553,0.0016066715,0.00025787437,0.000029138984,0.00000394703,0.0000023652578,0.0024826876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991778,0.00013624677,0.0001338337,0.00008924724,0.00026204676,0.0002007974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991682,0.0002754751,0.00004720478,0.00014766846,0.0002691794,0.000092266244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015733046,0.0000387818,0.00003923647,0.000043010023,0.00057067315,0.00034404965,0.00025032752,0.00004411208,0.0004200775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006855705,0.000028236534,0.000011013899,0.00070825906,0.000053291118,0.00055089773,0.000017306409,0.0008480856,0.000033910754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022099032,0.000023906134,0.06412716,4.0868227e-7,0.0000023229263,2.4275957e-7,0.0061601205,4.4187536e-7,0.00002379256,0.828849,0.044915117,0.05589528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002233063,0.0000013676499,0.13706957,7.214194e-7,4.963709e-7,1.6757724e-7,0.0063251625,0.000017237087,0.0000049474147,0.0015227692,0.85499746,0.00003778843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82732624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031458432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083261365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99729574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1035098506","doi":"","title":"Troubling Feelings: Moral Anger and Clinical Legal Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Anger; Social psychology; Legal education; Psychology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.04477521796272497,"score_gpt":0.3829250215082699,"score_spread":0.3381498035455449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1035098506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37176657,0.00021646214,0.0003348425,0.10463914,0.0038095866,0.00029014458,0.0000030921908,0.00017049127,0.5187697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747523,0.00005615793,0.003933734,0.009109152,0.0025260646,0.000018230716,0.000013122276,0.000011778535,0.009579451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856275,0.00037074822,0.00033296808,0.0002521855,0.00025267288,0.00022865347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875253,0.00036658286,0.00015250158,0.00019980634,0.00026938278,0.00025918946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001996531,0.000089520436,0.00013128012,0.00006156958,0.0007202061,0.0006439978,0.00016481514,0.00012982516,0.00060540607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026461605,0.00009161213,0.000051068117,0.00033360033,0.00024174323,0.0014543904,0.000026657382,0.00046686412,0.0002927717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008464364,0.00012689423,0.015338533,0.000004206414,0.000009169631,1.6081677e-7,0.0008292631,9.293922e-7,0.000015959375,0.9535097,0.015768522,0.014388186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019808588,0.00002859096,0.008229498,0.000014037631,0.000019802572,0.000001453909,0.001880376,0.000041456,0.00001042236,0.009852291,0.97959286,0.00013112508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015401814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066885604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96382433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060206352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092500285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99115473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1058365201","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1028","title":"The Critical Characteristics of Community Legal Aid Clinics in Ontario","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.0912782148151113,"score_gpt":0.45576877241492225,"score_spread":0.36449055759981097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1058365201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8098834,0.000012363577,0.000010319794,0.1480897,0.00035091344,0.000031824697,0.000002879642,0.0000019857846,0.04161657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960186,0.0000469337,0.00007391851,0.0029726895,0.00068910874,3.9560246e-7,4.657521e-7,0.0000023783584,0.00019549511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998977,0.00031195997,0.0003871409,0.000020043146,0.00018420896,0.00011965781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998856,0.0005161381,0.00024403859,0.000044437173,0.0002905532,0.000048813115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017689168,0.000037271577,0.0001261034,0.0000434259,0.001006157,0.00012803524,0.00014106238,0.00006955692,0.000013006602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014162477,0.000029579729,0.000046761612,0.00013524144,0.00060374325,0.00038331444,0.000017065193,0.00087503076,9.4011455e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001993909,0.00011691938,0.0008072143,0.0000025821416,0.0000063338725,8.203265e-7,0.082829565,1.12108616e-7,0.0000049573555,0.91500664,0.00010905888,0.001095861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004435073,0.0000913872,0.086022705,0.00001532192,0.000016496348,0.0000065121917,0.020847643,9.6237905e-8,0.000005717267,0.101941906,0.7905502,0.00005851897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48833227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44731215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81306475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019817191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003023292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77386475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106139605","doi":"","title":"Peer Review and Legal Publishing: What Law Librarians Need to Know about Open, Single-Blind, and Double-Blind Reviewing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Double blind; Selection (genetic algorithm); Peer review; Single blind; Legal research; Political science; Open peer review; Law; Legal writing; Public relations; Computer science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.09058961384895464,"score_gpt":0.39112982641823363,"score_spread":0.300540212569279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W106139605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017819592,0.11520593,0.00013329083,0.80073285,0.00036933122,0.00073156774,0.0000011183348,0.000031231128,0.08101271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4453535,0.39805478,0.0011124071,0.097460926,0.0020254112,0.000042532243,0.00002769488,0.000046483932,0.055876248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969696,0.00033291138,0.00050054566,0.00030092927,0.00060640567,0.0012896188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814475,0.00013112197,0.00031841086,0.00019471938,0.0008725005,0.0003384718],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009762054,0.00017340093,0.0003185432,0.0001544991,0.0013599158,0.015664944,0.00063021696,0.00012277978,0.00014338309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019395677,0.00015864108,0.000055234086,0.001141726,0.000096146636,0.02201467,0.000082727915,0.0024931557,0.000020145491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012552245,0.00008148253,0.000020106168,0.000018885778,0.000033593562,0.0000014907109,0.0020863211,3.0187547e-7,0.000020739626,0.9154097,0.020942722,0.06125913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015907871,0.00015461496,0.000027234591,0.0005191108,0.00010167797,0.00015426918,0.007849278,4.7297002e-7,0.0000057970888,0.032030202,0.95735717,0.00020941564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001575471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007466111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9364144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040844764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004734611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1115536093","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1029","title":"A Response to \"The Critical Characteristics of Community Legal Aid Clinics in Ontario\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.09211197741561815,"score_gpt":0.46165063457544253,"score_spread":0.36953865715982437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1115536093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70027447,0.000003137089,0.000016932901,0.29316688,0.00018996638,0.000036504458,0.0000043807686,0.0000015461176,0.0063061793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863921,0.0000061005594,0.00017270939,0.012639552,0.0005665846,8.3207453e-7,3.852136e-7,0.0000029147807,0.0002188367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985347,0.0007098833,0.00039291693,0.000026364574,0.00021070876,0.00012544538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873465,0.00063202216,0.00018981214,0.000057656547,0.0003112104,0.00007462373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033696198,0.000042384032,0.00014705148,0.00009075225,0.0006408234,0.00010066094,0.0001620882,0.00007049173,0.0000232207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034244969,0.000035447163,0.000047286107,0.00024270316,0.00033212794,0.0003304559,0.000023447688,0.0007934067,0.000002463892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002267444,0.00017675688,0.0004427026,0.0000027362137,0.000006446315,0.0000020147497,0.2237466,5.690073e-7,0.00003105297,0.7744134,0.0003287661,0.00062218943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041901477,0.00016427688,0.10485845,0.000018656705,0.000013426491,0.000008353232,0.018670307,6.919469e-8,0.0000070489627,0.017324606,0.8584586,0.000057228215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43904468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3432195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8581298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002537529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035509707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66876507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1122857891","doi":"","title":"Research guides: Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Media reports","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12672183141219528,"score_gpt":0.4546053300598281,"score_spread":0.32788349864763283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1122857891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012422516,0.0005800534,0.0000072499147,0.04351677,0.0027503096,0.00042791798,0.000015725254,0.000047745754,0.95141196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08087895,0.001353137,0.0031618532,0.00134892,0.005652493,0.0001659588,0.00022503108,0.000039838673,0.9071738],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972309,0.00044966082,0.00061975524,0.0003190131,0.0010620632,0.0003186402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99527186,0.0017888023,0.0003848568,0.00041509242,0.0019820936,0.00015729561],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004036904,0.00012106918,0.0002517231,0.00045819674,0.0005506961,0.00031089762,0.00025981085,0.00040137485,0.014587036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004415972,0.00009658194,0.000043560805,0.0007389746,0.0010917395,0.0007469547,0.000071409035,0.00079839805,0.00016194156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.850099e-7,0.00003252178,0.000066691704,0.000020049056,0.000019069434,0.0000036741305,0.014148379,1.15272645e-8,0.000003721306,0.08115447,0.9039183,0.000632192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034655244,0.0000128013835,0.00014447042,0.000059744398,0.000011700415,0.00000351032,0.007637792,6.820993e-7,0.000020274343,0.060091916,0.9318727,0.00010975637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21157354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017462404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19411114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000694753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018091328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98631376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1134036274","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Criminal Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science","score_opus":0.2209897964199036,"score_gpt":0.4732451683537597,"score_spread":0.25225537193385605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1134036274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027693316,0.0005197355,9.5174823e-7,0.05624159,0.0013322057,0.00030613868,0.000060376304,0.00003601848,0.94122607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10019623,0.00090964744,0.0005969913,0.018055549,0.0021363483,0.00011845707,0.00029067314,0.00004225322,0.87765384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679285,0.00068159273,0.00044659598,0.00038754463,0.0007320818,0.00095932884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779445,0.0005370517,0.00011000176,0.0003504947,0.00073436747,0.00047361274],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035312085,0.00017127466,0.00021970109,0.0004990379,0.0014789855,0.00083452096,0.00086819055,0.0005783364,0.012970252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001095139,0.00017120488,0.000051719635,0.0009679792,0.000984511,0.0008443483,0.000054663124,0.0016197114,0.0009627228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010645817,0.00003396844,0.00008921,0.000011338731,0.000005129191,0.0000032661549,0.010042694,3.3073288e-8,3.5618208e-7,0.5242844,0.46518293,0.00034556002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051906634,0.000025390113,0.000022918204,0.000050535993,0.000011413607,8.1483915e-7,0.03636844,3.3927623e-7,0.000015486243,0.006468227,0.9567794,0.00020512115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99964213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51781625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075236114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008252723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114302304","doi":"","title":"Conflicts of Interest in Canada: The McKercher Decision","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Flexibility (engineering); Legal ethics; Conflict of interest; Court decision; Conflict of laws; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.07175265176882184,"score_gpt":0.35143825932774336,"score_spread":0.2796856075589215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114302304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9042214,0.00025207674,0.0012469335,0.0651099,0.0005342813,0.00007864357,4.173523e-7,0.000003591825,0.028552763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997917,0.00035902954,0.0000258589,0.0005525398,0.0001430503,0.0000012869434,2.9143544e-7,0.000003089014,0.0009978584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987969,0.00025872263,0.00019306211,0.00004998007,0.00015553056,0.0005458086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912596,0.0004927389,0.00013551628,0.00007707287,0.00013391291,0.000034797635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040340237,0.0000359397,0.00006083662,0.00004827951,0.00019244208,0.000037112455,0.00023553561,0.000026431535,0.000114144335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017318602,0.000025351947,0.00001807791,0.00031346895,0.000051434297,0.00017795774,0.000009513458,0.0013458903,0.0000050121503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008844062,0.000015582824,0.0045689195,3.9909028e-7,0.000008342089,1.13901905e-7,0.0025769102,0.00000767896,0.000016308131,0.95371324,0.0008243589,0.038259286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024651308,0.000034598914,0.011293328,0.00001636925,0.000006726535,0.000012762623,0.03200041,0.00003557292,0.000023065864,0.27561763,0.6806455,0.00006752074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9026479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67982113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013506867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023715084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98181957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W115413550","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511558696.019","title":"The condition of India (cont.): lawyers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.04998935388273615,"score_gpt":0.27731441246157884,"score_spread":0.2273250585788427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W115413550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005736021,0.00005105741,0.000030099383,0.00038339975,0.0005339285,0.0002735892,0.00009880657,0.000041638436,0.99853015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014510112,0.0002235338,0.000016629729,0.000102546626,0.00012341893,7.1290566e-7,0.000026085203,0.000011495458,0.9849855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920195,0.00009312034,0.00015737177,0.00015842202,0.0002359029,0.0001532343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985727,0.00026876573,0.00042725835,0.00026141197,0.0003880295,0.00008181667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033111565,0.0001151847,0.00013753388,0.000093669565,0.00077411055,0.000058792582,0.0004019897,0.00023289744,0.00005214847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008665119,0.000115611896,0.00009562087,0.000016272557,0.0008080353,0.00020681808,0.000060923074,0.00041979394,0.000024298839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021310418,0.0000056999556,0.00000279645,0.0000073003043,0.00005591208,0.0000039854476,0.0013170872,3.434614e-8,0.000003673493,0.9298214,0.06770917,0.0010516355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116592906,0.00001346508,0.000050289505,0.000027533608,0.00008282242,5.4343417e-7,0.0009128089,2.1188727e-7,0.00004711307,0.0002461408,0.9983771,0.000125398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043309126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015751366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93066794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001360265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007366475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6547074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1161908381","doi":"","title":"A Look at the Development of Legal Education in Ontario through the Eyes of Six Lawyers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal education; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05141653529888249,"score_gpt":0.350541611960265,"score_spread":0.29912507666138255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1161908381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62805223,0.00012178596,0.000015489533,0.020798374,0.0006214621,0.00026387544,0.000001342917,0.000009373349,0.35011607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96670717,0.0000045049887,0.0015515649,0.0012801551,0.000088823705,0.000039439936,0.0000083937,0.000005038427,0.030314934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987926,0.0002158241,0.0003422028,0.000115299095,0.00038507534,0.0001490083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898714,0.00022134598,0.00022422179,0.0002251798,0.000286193,0.0000559029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012769018,0.00006816085,0.0000984538,0.000028238293,0.00035168877,0.00007263684,0.0002958464,0.000052414947,0.0006971223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054768054,0.000045449724,0.000030184763,0.00039274726,0.00031025134,0.0006471208,0.000047294416,0.0002749645,0.00009202821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003342794,0.00027309192,0.030014152,0.0000074343952,0.00002396383,1.539568e-7,0.20210162,0.00003667637,0.0001017587,0.74017584,0.025726069,0.0015058093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001331118,0.000010181506,0.011573337,0.000017982182,0.000007715255,4.4963275e-7,0.04007553,4.6642157e-7,0.00055559597,0.0026102646,0.9449546,0.0000608135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5950881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.961412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9192285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005256806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011139682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99446625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W118711946","doi":"10.14264/131304","title":"Challenges for Australian Tribunals; Towards Aretaic Practice Principles","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The University of Queensland","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Normative; Law; Sociology; Public relations","score_opus":0.14664632380400333,"score_gpt":0.4174058832373463,"score_spread":0.27075955943334296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118711946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0103877075,0.0006810819,0.00012337508,0.15877537,0.000966876,0.00086712855,0.000089962545,0.000055988647,0.8280525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30382985,0.006898913,0.0029110129,0.00038935477,0.0008228587,0.0000033755482,0.00097500155,0.000034594203,0.684135],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989985,0.00019866413,0.00014880375,0.00016104507,0.00030908934,0.00018385396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976521,0.0008392922,0.0004728887,0.00018376316,0.00079365494,0.000058286565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017771324,0.000100529694,0.00016317905,0.000120759214,0.0007432623,0.000039575087,0.00035743712,0.00023056263,0.00026265485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013576995,0.000095339536,0.000092562164,0.00022525758,0.00015742496,0.00035557928,0.000010355946,0.0003267191,0.000020293512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011763464,0.00025373095,0.000078320365,0.00032916764,0.00042264638,0.0000075347266,0.4900594,0.000010253457,0.000022029732,0.39816537,0.067144684,0.04233049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016143556,0.000026411803,0.0022693726,0.000036357967,0.00014963989,5.59873e-7,0.21888441,0.0000012292338,0.000032331005,0.0005466451,0.7778031,0.00008850654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007980496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03643732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71065843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009360022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011498638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1192759474","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Civil Procedure","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14542644269188043,"score_gpt":0.4478559072640235,"score_spread":0.3024294645721431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1192759474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025060173,0.00076108135,5.165978e-7,0.082961775,0.0009982919,0.00044448528,0.00005436467,0.00004282641,0.91448605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07824492,0.0012520427,0.00020700831,0.008665524,0.0015906179,0.00016133802,0.00022612912,0.00003677378,0.90961564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970101,0.0005054262,0.0004191776,0.00040554325,0.0007196985,0.0009400158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979221,0.00039946192,0.00011963823,0.00031994292,0.0007910871,0.00044777544],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032322241,0.0001714409,0.00021364822,0.0006465103,0.0011827156,0.00064209837,0.0008517259,0.0006645359,0.012930169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024636427,0.00016683633,0.000044869867,0.0015512935,0.0005682568,0.0006961166,0.000048793467,0.0016839817,0.00078555197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.613754e-7,0.000040865736,0.0006156514,0.000019771149,0.0000065585627,0.0000021486792,0.01161822,5.062876e-8,3.7583933e-7,0.34681743,0.6405457,0.00033235768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005033984,0.000019341145,0.000059392467,0.000077786164,0.000005901536,6.780239e-7,0.025685955,4.7176806e-7,0.0000081023,0.004707441,0.96917856,0.00020603299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99960977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34210998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075336057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016524412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W121275545","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001437","title":"Teaching “Human Rights in Africa” Transnationally: Reflections on the Jos-Osgoode Virtual Classroom Experience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Institution; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Plateau (mathematics); Sociology","score_opus":0.08648714055631132,"score_gpt":0.4336545503878741,"score_spread":0.3471674098315628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W121275545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1244686,0.000008527364,0.00022242608,0.15531251,0.00042390102,0.00010539225,0.0000016430033,0.00003443481,0.7194226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935421,0.0000024238298,0.00018708305,0.0028558273,0.0006193348,0.000008990595,0.0000019475813,0.000003725656,0.0027785744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982913,0.0005245869,0.0002985314,0.00012798727,0.0004871293,0.00027044266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924165,0.00028295067,0.00014253611,0.000120664554,0.00011346333,0.00009871064],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014344477,0.00008547669,0.000078490484,0.00013601447,0.0055016037,0.000430436,0.0003097864,0.00006644637,0.0007374296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013078138,0.0000641581,0.000054719403,0.00039817175,0.00014823653,0.0009872143,0.000004990024,0.0013352495,0.000040225576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054341435,0.00014235928,0.00001458552,1.5265871e-7,0.0000040921836,0.0000033300737,0.0703898,0.000016304366,0.00032565588,0.92591566,0.0027141706,0.00046844734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015138082,0.00006110118,0.0015313873,0.0000141272685,0.0000047592976,0.000015132859,0.0067387675,0.000009091414,0.000036783098,0.15684313,0.8344935,0.00010084919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004284994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0270642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8690735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021568312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018615405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W123047629","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-5294-8_5","title":"Realizing Moral Purpose","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16362631791454715,"score_gpt":0.3990102563049537,"score_spread":0.23538393839040653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W123047629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001022333,0.00024300112,0.000031422038,0.022832096,0.00077031413,0.00014292389,0.0000051108027,0.00010003745,0.97587407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040697143,0.00032668468,0.0006024387,0.0017679813,0.0015065115,0.0000057166144,0.000031079962,0.000017592758,0.9916723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992337,0.000026902633,0.00016799224,0.000118122414,0.00027432365,0.00017894318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929154,0.00011323146,0.00014409386,0.00016322103,0.00017438194,0.00011350277],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050075987,0.00009604348,0.0001015931,0.000093832,0.00037442258,0.00015592048,0.0001452258,0.00022623582,0.0333732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001606035,0.00009491061,0.00005227905,0.000051128864,0.00012056194,0.0005562601,0.000021014974,0.00039807535,0.002446184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.6431405e-7,0.0000069851762,0.000015188142,0.0000019805618,0.000008057154,3.9402303e-7,0.0020532836,2.0016355e-8,6.4787895e-7,0.88899416,0.09273095,0.016187558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020405105,0.0000027693807,0.000012958349,0.000009210192,0.000019625902,6.0364783e-7,0.0006408208,1.2410032e-7,0.0000010729887,0.03865069,0.9605167,0.00012502291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004007637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002170025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86778575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109138506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006745539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99833053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W123139672","doi":"10.29173/alr45","title":"Qualitative Research on Legal Education: Studying Outstanding Law Teachers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Legal research; Sociology; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Law; Legal education; Data collection; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.3452753466288712,"score_gpt":0.6086062936886351,"score_spread":0.26333094705976384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W123139672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059675437,0.0021692351,0.000010572697,0.16709784,0.00055781327,0.0004678923,6.2928217e-7,0.000022523518,0.82907677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265014,0.0020414942,0.00029663747,0.031652488,0.00086117955,0.00020961273,0.000016478743,0.000019314695,0.0384014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477667,0.003667184,0.0003338782,0.00027293267,0.00063313654,0.00031619825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432194,0.0045748423,0.00014501835,0.0003360687,0.00047834573,0.00014376741],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009461037,0.0001038865,0.00020503743,0.000062314546,0.0015886656,0.0003245621,0.00030808809,0.000058795475,0.0008503564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00603373,0.00009335936,0.00006363785,0.0009736634,0.00037658686,0.00084177084,0.000028570548,0.000602102,0.0011414436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001634233,0.0001110265,0.000014481942,0.000080899335,0.000011906088,7.485463e-8,0.044565704,1.2551777e-7,9.665298e-7,0.916728,0.034094103,0.004391057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056060195,0.000034017343,0.000009126247,0.00086832716,0.000019692628,5.193107e-7,0.02572772,4.0517185e-7,0.0000033771096,0.00516593,0.9679997,0.00011514378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11822743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044041578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9339056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024244527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081771455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1244090291","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Law: Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.045723278725115085,"score_gpt":0.3357348860507691,"score_spread":0.290011607325654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1244090291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000730404,0.00036474323,0.0000021451983,0.19559206,0.004040917,0.00012349064,0.00006845896,0.00013441124,0.79966646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00093805493,0.0019951602,0.0010054011,0.0632317,0.0031309729,0.000017817796,0.00039303326,0.000027252732,0.9292606],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851906,0.00015310221,0.00030557957,0.00020427715,0.00054898317,0.00026901392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987936,0.00047351082,0.00018234923,0.00024226533,0.00015974903,0.00014855133],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016566407,0.00013302926,0.00016008726,0.00007100386,0.00093094195,0.00031294624,0.00045901223,0.00023403917,0.022741789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061218254,0.00012862668,0.000045433357,0.0004977057,0.00019665489,0.0010963979,0.00003884339,0.0005593762,0.00017601435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.7656636e-7,0.00000951122,0.000022638445,0.0000048870493,0.000010724996,0.000005573431,0.00088680245,1.6044591e-7,3.668378e-8,0.27904376,0.719665,0.00035043465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002732529,0.0000027272467,0.000017962524,0.000014034963,0.000007832011,0.0000017332674,0.0023212365,2.6554727e-7,0.000004517007,0.00094658433,0.9964777,0.00017806627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99678576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27809718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019511285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03646841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97815156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W125614389","doi":"","title":"A declaration of ethics for presiding officers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Declaration; Business ethics; Summit; Applied ethics; Information ethics; Law; Parliament; Government (linguistics); Political science; Ethics of technology; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Normative ethics; Public relations; Public administration; Meta-ethics; Politics","score_opus":0.434021735768999,"score_gpt":0.44338848057230584,"score_spread":0.009366744803306848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W125614389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068397583,0.06710837,0.0011645788,0.3251946,0.0025043304,0.0059669185,0.00023195636,0.00008032101,0.5909092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8010896,0.07508836,0.015128482,0.10399799,0.0004534751,0.0004950899,0.00023278904,0.00003773156,0.0034765117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930084,0.00014797444,0.00020772505,0.00008846163,0.000107246706,0.00014774631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992635,0.00013416173,0.00012471982,0.00011049631,0.00020628436,0.0001608273],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012101447,0.000045235734,0.00009799532,0.000062824125,0.0002906776,0.00001701349,0.00012296262,0.000052168267,0.0016267064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010072206,0.000048698545,0.000041674542,0.00028950305,0.00006822374,0.00033361226,0.000002806944,0.00013608113,0.000021412552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012705008,0.00008073699,0.0034874587,0.0019940557,0.00009604919,0.000001490264,0.06554772,6.475672e-7,0.0000299013,0.41219145,0.44993627,0.06662154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041357733,0.000014685896,0.00033619636,0.000340744,0.000046304085,2.980777e-7,0.0025030032,9.901249e-7,0.00003444332,0.00047485152,0.99614704,0.00006011034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63026017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7291025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79424983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017721865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045261374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W125632841","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2439526","title":"Access to Justice: A Critique of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada's Inventory of Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Legal service","score_opus":0.024117503425832684,"score_gpt":0.3497024901199302,"score_spread":0.3255849866940975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W125632841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8797318,0.0002600079,0.00014196183,0.0812188,0.00065065135,0.0003688737,0.000058955375,0.0000029822374,0.037566006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970096,0.000083479514,0.000023417237,0.0023534065,0.000094201816,0.000005930398,0.0000011259569,0.000007023268,0.00042184725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755245,0.0004895481,0.00060582557,0.0000923517,0.00081437064,0.00044544853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693656,0.00033031174,0.0010629233,0.0001691154,0.0014463335,0.000054784236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019223915,0.00009394026,0.0002520165,0.000043329946,0.00054235704,0.000055356613,0.0009064357,0.00006154997,0.000037268837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005791057,0.00006950144,0.000086673936,0.00053972565,0.00034449852,0.00081168197,0.00009834744,0.000566512,2.5892536e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034933735,0.000076948345,0.0026818428,0.00025998228,0.0001197552,2.439624e-8,0.019191995,0.0003897234,0.0017033686,0.9718468,0.0036240628,0.00007054683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010083893,0.00051758846,0.043447334,0.0009240804,0.0004633957,0.000007924645,0.56843734,0.00010501028,0.17906716,0.16608116,0.039399173,0.000541416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9564976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99803054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8057656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049917557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034503914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97096956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W127097073","doi":"","title":"Killing Ourselves: Depression as an Institutional, Workplace and Professionalism Problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Depression (economics); Institution; Liberian dollar; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Business; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.18715339064534545,"score_gpt":0.42972257967568633,"score_spread":0.2425691890303409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W127097073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850296,0.00019891064,0.00023813924,0.004504155,0.0005648076,0.00030939357,0.000005788883,0.00014247786,0.009006748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773644,0.00009247939,0.0002944077,0.000839078,0.00030760365,0.000003307402,0.000028489054,0.00001580979,0.02105442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980138,0.00059841917,0.00017714563,0.0003133848,0.00045966567,0.00043758747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987535,0.00018820804,0.00018796534,0.00022955419,0.00024150278,0.00039928182],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011450738,0.00016452212,0.00013698905,0.0002956223,0.001729824,0.00041442897,0.0003644579,0.00022459673,0.00018256747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001935671,0.0001751034,0.000037579157,0.00065387966,0.00024885964,0.009824722,0.00013108218,0.0006624201,0.00016880412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000416014,0.00020931267,0.96295214,0.000017275719,0.000014452021,0.0000063383814,0.013453412,0.0000043556915,0.000073342635,0.021819817,0.000005048436,0.0014029248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047541686,0.000027998956,0.7474703,0.00019380564,0.000054345783,0.00002029342,0.013173362,1.529278e-7,0.00011058359,0.0009124842,0.23720835,0.00035286113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011110694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010045896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2372033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002021285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006823101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134638635","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6091-731-8_3","title":"Practitioner Reflection and Judgement as Phronesis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Phronesis; Techne; Episteme; Judgement; Practical wisdom; Epistemology; Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05819840387454809,"score_gpt":0.3518616629084635,"score_spread":0.2936632590339154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134638635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005020883,0.00017291497,0.000019813942,0.020353992,0.0019500654,0.00038444778,0.0000070226083,0.00015016162,0.97691137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009505753,0.00013392282,0.00032371283,0.0031904185,0.0015548229,0.000025303803,0.00005088512,0.000046786114,0.9851684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998442,0.00010738088,0.0002932834,0.00032247812,0.0005369929,0.00029784662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844736,0.0002062864,0.00039576192,0.00025992945,0.00046854132,0.00022210595],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009441075,0.00021379923,0.0001831412,0.00029023376,0.00085537974,0.0009293021,0.00011024816,0.0004259035,0.0052019726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004305083,0.00023290195,0.00006952549,0.00005581148,0.00032841045,0.0013480323,0.00004116073,0.00069976924,0.00043995722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012418619,0.00001753946,0.0000049591636,0.000011374136,0.000072801304,0.0000020265445,0.0075858673,8.327277e-8,0.000020012138,0.7563197,0.20345123,0.032502007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010585598,0.000021565465,0.000018670466,0.000023238395,0.00010491478,0.000009473577,0.001796436,2.6418232e-7,0.000010985787,0.025614299,0.9720305,0.0002637921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027174116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013320018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76857924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003261633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009944352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134984923","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1197","title":"Transformative Social Work in the Criminal Justice Field","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Conviction; Criminal justice; Work (physics); Criminology; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Social work; Political science; Law; Social justice; Public relations; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.07027117737201392,"score_gpt":0.4345513415156712,"score_spread":0.36428016414365727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134984923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09434109,0.000014682562,0.00019139085,0.54014575,0.00028193605,0.000060059407,0.0000011453839,0.000004147336,0.36495978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728049,0.000017913413,0.000057547673,0.023136552,0.0038245572,0.0000012268919,2.819112e-7,0.0000021451126,0.00015489385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989868,0.00039989865,0.00021745852,0.000032302167,0.00023061225,0.00013292846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992423,0.00041611845,0.00016354244,0.000020092646,0.00012858702,0.000029356004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014726667,0.000043259806,0.00009733919,0.00006492403,0.0011647348,0.0001592592,0.00013550324,0.00007213388,0.000039857026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041531873,0.000032051543,0.00004935939,0.00035410436,0.00017070015,0.00046619138,0.0000042656375,0.0004064772,0.0000030945935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018695613,0.000025191954,0.000009840159,0.0000053381145,0.0000036487945,3.24485e-7,0.35286158,8.318094e-8,0.0000015314819,0.63890886,0.0033167938,0.0048481026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028969123,0.00005401081,0.002850658,0.0000072554194,0.000066577035,0.0000038810595,0.1328932,7.3933506e-7,0.0000043755376,0.018816216,0.84494954,0.000063840766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003236356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087223673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8784638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040246374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032914898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89583164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W135727461","doi":"","title":"Founding Legal Education in America","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal education; Political science; Legal ethics","score_opus":0.015239008100383845,"score_gpt":0.29145446231529853,"score_spread":0.27621545421491467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W135727461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15332319,0.000024380175,0.00022635127,0.05191859,0.000581923,0.00036944172,0.000012735175,0.00014142286,0.79340196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9121957,0.000024922681,0.00029342886,0.0005595527,0.00025786684,0.0000072163625,0.00007670427,0.000016327915,0.086568296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854934,0.00014254914,0.00025233816,0.00030971746,0.00029449345,0.00045156712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986891,0.00030769198,0.00013754774,0.00028212913,0.000348393,0.00023514437],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017724586,0.00017557199,0.00020338986,0.0008998527,0.0006533832,0.0008461498,0.00047430236,0.00009747686,0.0010806542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007280025,0.00020844894,0.000096873606,0.0026659812,0.00028704913,0.0061935293,0.00012508957,0.00043650754,0.00076178403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003764166,0.001145434,0.060222905,0.000015000775,0.000045758185,0.000016024476,0.005109464,0.00003627083,0.00013013298,0.6889942,0.14828452,0.09596263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002708175,0.00003207536,0.006379613,0.00002374957,0.000009930113,0.0000044964527,0.025484612,0.000047596237,0.000004677823,0.00056444464,0.9669227,0.00025531024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01688313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024130747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81863815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005350316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016915718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1450639465","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Privacy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Information privacy; Privacy law; Political science; Law; Computer science; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.20632104151090797,"score_gpt":0.4759595585280398,"score_spread":0.2696385170171318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1450639465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003869241,0.00055667723,9.071145e-7,0.08547516,0.0012010579,0.00035787493,0.000042214368,0.000036102985,0.9119431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05432268,0.0020238322,0.00052441104,0.007700669,0.0016375589,0.00010743457,0.00023072063,0.000035182988,0.9334175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703515,0.00064448896,0.00041922188,0.0003566756,0.0006556635,0.00088881614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789417,0.0005308427,0.00011038127,0.000388508,0.0006427459,0.0004333792],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003600294,0.00014985816,0.0001982599,0.00065079227,0.0011044366,0.0006325401,0.0009845198,0.00054725603,0.013279263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025268516,0.00014861206,0.000043842338,0.0013222279,0.0005505204,0.00087612536,0.00006637588,0.0015228138,0.0010992839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.394373e-7,0.000032686265,0.00048324483,0.0000073466704,0.0000053825243,0.0000019614622,0.011477284,2.5980999e-8,3.1342512e-7,0.4250571,0.5622847,0.0006492705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004954938,0.000016294673,0.00006548685,0.00004594966,0.0000047769336,3.7900875e-7,0.016318282,3.05252e-7,0.000009130743,0.00482264,0.97848386,0.0001833273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42023447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008017339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011488162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1451039275","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511807039.006","title":"DIALOGUES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.06747266759287196,"score_gpt":0.2835512738676674,"score_spread":0.21607860627479542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1451039275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000938079,0.00006501904,0.000044039207,0.0017231039,0.0005949734,0.00023083518,0.00008991462,0.00015466123,0.9970881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00090424315,0.00025269893,0.00011844247,0.0004109498,0.001122441,4.854573e-7,0.000051968498,0.000019299714,0.9971195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990713,0.00006708404,0.00012729758,0.00025046978,0.00028009719,0.00020372875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896413,0.00014749871,0.00019914912,0.00026467178,0.00027721096,0.00014735702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020470803,0.00015794371,0.00016457059,0.00015177824,0.00063269294,0.00012431626,0.0003786329,0.00031591608,0.000108152926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074645664,0.00020438216,0.000105828534,0.000014077559,0.00037528723,0.00030278467,0.00007977668,0.0005635615,0.00015417731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007806576,0.000006164012,7.082888e-7,0.000004378396,0.000028189708,0.000011217948,0.00083656,1.5599755e-7,0.0000012303561,0.7771489,0.21964544,0.0023092488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110148234,0.0000073070164,0.0000053978456,0.000024136265,0.0000743883,8.200431e-7,0.00032846697,7.987889e-7,0.0000070036954,0.00003566094,0.99917877,0.00022712033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028278632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019549899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7795333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030527968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084813853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83344626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1464615643","doi":"","title":"The Forms and Limits of Judicial Inquiry: Judges as Inquiry Commissioners in Canada and Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Adjudication; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Sociology; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.06208624747103884,"score_gpt":0.3661541928609082,"score_spread":0.30406794538986937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1464615643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9431555,0.0001143802,0.000031783835,0.042018127,0.0009207212,0.00017073708,0.0000016344086,0.000012393302,0.013574723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99748135,0.00016310062,0.000083026716,0.0010965499,0.0002106755,0.000008161672,0.0000038766602,0.000006347158,0.0009469418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890506,0.00018426345,0.00025017638,0.00014550518,0.0002731639,0.00024182217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875134,0.00070725515,0.00015421576,0.00014871884,0.00009835896,0.0001401081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009575436,0.00008652507,0.00013182481,0.00007684545,0.0005326294,0.000113948285,0.00016749417,0.000093590614,0.00008524063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016931772,0.000066372784,0.000013524057,0.0005398038,0.0004597443,0.0003376609,0.000031623258,0.00031645267,0.0000033786414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006204113,0.00006948337,0.23825505,0.000025510168,0.000034750432,0.0000025100303,0.07475251,0.000025225949,0.000055035976,0.5711769,0.066990905,0.04855009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004402323,0.000051094245,0.17491835,0.000065306136,0.000021093876,0.0000026329865,0.07037736,0.00006467683,0.00006915552,0.014225856,0.73953015,0.0002341269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8557767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95518386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67253923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121211306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013728541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40966085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1465600500","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16292792948157803,"score_gpt":0.4828933617618431,"score_spread":0.3199654322802651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1465600500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031693172,0.00095680595,7.742215e-7,0.073687375,0.0024529782,0.00039603782,0.00003153764,0.000030428266,0.9221271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04239465,0.0015319411,0.00044332255,0.009027858,0.0020232364,0.00017752641,0.00039870865,0.000029465924,0.9439733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973316,0.00063430617,0.0004006274,0.00034338652,0.0005728438,0.0007172293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786836,0.000373204,0.00011951475,0.00033572977,0.0008975793,0.00040561697],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031454745,0.00014158993,0.00016920705,0.00078696397,0.0010420104,0.0006028568,0.0006972954,0.0005315525,0.010382752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017198278,0.00014681922,0.000038414757,0.0013474373,0.0004444952,0.0007454615,0.000033981487,0.0012769486,0.0010124958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.185219e-7,0.0000620284,0.00036732585,0.000008155355,0.0000036438694,3.4892906e-7,0.0074746856,2.35532e-8,3.1583315e-7,0.42915797,0.5604677,0.002457277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030309157,0.000013352515,0.00006914501,0.00006029181,0.0000053925323,3.8794212e-7,0.034984667,2.2878967e-7,0.000008056539,0.007198385,0.9574591,0.0001706935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99864596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42195958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010762586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029758273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1472795679","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2609499","title":"The Women and Men of Harvard Law School: The Preliminary Results from the HLS Career Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04644426580776532,"score_gpt":0.3401525525661528,"score_spread":0.29370828675838745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1472795679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7494715,0.0016315546,0.000019744139,0.197287,0.00050497,0.0005159265,0.0000110432675,0.000017153045,0.050541125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99404913,0.00071343966,0.0000064667333,0.00046486434,0.0004773733,0.000016032474,0.000001125857,0.000005689455,0.0042658527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767554,0.0008359282,0.00025962797,0.00009717926,0.00046260943,0.0006691225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802756,0.0010865527,0.0002512296,0.00022657393,0.0003218674,0.00008624106],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011200848,0.00006436538,0.00007470709,0.000015137728,0.0015991519,0.00036500438,0.00050572783,0.0000339899,0.000025713778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023607665,0.00003018723,0.000023476816,0.00025877787,0.00025426035,0.000400884,0.000048710957,0.0014801369,0.000020186064],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007388328,0.00019670918,0.004960075,4.5675898e-7,0.00037840477,6.6522534e-7,0.36355656,0.000010856512,0.000010831148,0.59262335,0.028162599,0.00936065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004743422,0.0002931263,0.0040286584,0.0000026440607,0.000025736443,0.0000056067206,0.5264713,0.0000034929083,0.0000022498082,0.13177004,0.33687836,0.000044396013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01910354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032892387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4608533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044516963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005768589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1473696116","doi":"","title":"The Judicial Regulation of Lawyers in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Foundation (evidence); Law; Public interest; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017584719940105673,"score_gpt":0.2942136945084571,"score_spread":0.2766289745683514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1473696116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3293715,0.000057341418,0.00004318806,0.07979925,0.0016641883,0.00022302546,0.000003897163,0.000021489817,0.5888161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698174,0.000010214578,0.00008739397,0.0012125436,0.00023173724,0.000007872736,0.0000028191662,0.0000033603385,0.0014623144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907273,0.0002300664,0.00019481154,0.00007786741,0.00027899724,0.0001455002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991307,0.00043932832,0.00011586628,0.00013620692,0.000121444624,0.000056403976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096399523,0.000038078222,0.000061566745,0.000020780926,0.00042467852,0.00006170172,0.00015661266,0.000031569343,0.00030126283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012629417,0.000032691594,0.000014323612,0.00038016678,0.000115861585,0.00028067944,0.000009716672,0.00016717112,0.000023590917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005932089,0.00000955908,0.0073159803,0.0000014798293,0.0000028127267,7.979743e-8,0.0008808654,0.000038538317,0.000057416473,0.97828996,0.010837669,0.0025596994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009815037,0.0000048874113,0.039208073,0.000006570457,0.0000027159633,9.167727e-8,0.0023499313,0.000039402395,0.00010086317,0.0099132,0.948227,0.000049108807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96837676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025492487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023492181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4167412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147789528","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-931-1.ch089","title":"Knowledge Sharing in Legal Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Knowledge management; Business; Knowledge sharing; Legal practice; Context (archaeology); Practice of law; Public relations; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08127254413743325,"score_gpt":0.38485079585648024,"score_spread":0.303578251719047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147789528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001870152,0.000278584,0.00001450381,0.0032099558,0.0015141753,0.0003080736,0.000016404525,0.00010511393,0.9945345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.123964556,0.000026272806,0.00040233036,0.0016905089,0.0009096134,0.00002437968,0.000003915658,0.000030545132,0.8729479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984687,0.00007594817,0.00040262495,0.00039381968,0.000325801,0.00033309063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985815,0.00019283453,0.00033531396,0.00033691598,0.00040395584,0.00014942244],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008635299,0.00022099398,0.00023046881,0.00013277691,0.0003061567,0.00032624093,0.00047003425,0.00043231982,0.00078796595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008905555,0.0002540906,0.00008825135,0.000089338726,0.0001855869,0.00066787784,0.00010838455,0.0008510974,0.0014582541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018181876,0.000037150057,0.000023807803,0.000007747706,0.000026281943,0.000021099495,0.0053440193,9.269694e-8,3.795186e-7,0.9807192,0.008533104,0.00526893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000924728,0.00001214208,0.000021988653,0.00006280493,0.000031886033,0.000007201447,0.0005081079,3.8927553e-7,7.9118934e-7,0.24986048,0.74919534,0.00020642125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01862052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024678126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7406622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067637005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026413891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147977947","doi":"","title":"Painful Injustices: Encountering Social Suffering in Clinical Legal Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Politics; Sociology; Legal education; Psychology; Reification (Marxism); Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.042640641369725035,"score_gpt":0.43761429173849603,"score_spread":0.39497365036877097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147977947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91181815,0.0008098757,0.0014372958,0.024562689,0.004223083,0.00016304862,6.180617e-7,0.00004458036,0.05694065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99103266,0.00088469015,0.00014080634,0.0006843828,0.0049447883,0.000009895735,0.0000024092826,0.000011176527,0.0022891627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701214,0.0005209662,0.00047232263,0.0001099574,0.00029062582,0.0015939899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991868,0.00021393124,0.00026046918,0.0000701122,0.00015168196,0.000116997675],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01078161,0.000086843815,0.00012258833,0.00017230466,0.00070505106,0.00023882899,0.00022297124,0.00011693293,0.00016224601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001394505,0.00009103421,0.00007145403,0.0005052025,0.000090687434,0.0022608857,0.00001987017,0.0028954493,0.00005973773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001800091,0.00031945456,0.044651847,0.0000036753604,0.000022071179,2.147676e-7,0.013470951,0.0000011554359,0.000018733606,0.8730472,0.0005595932,0.0678871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038019128,0.00006662212,0.039377194,0.000028018112,0.000038442155,0.000047720885,0.18822396,0.000011336809,0.0000037650282,0.032557976,0.7389893,0.0002755046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003192086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012028617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8404892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014723047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014552486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1479932303","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495618.016","title":"Puritanism and the poor","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.03690387872496815,"score_gpt":0.26501203879883994,"score_spread":0.2281081600738718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1479932303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018928153,0.00013184447,0.000043966545,0.0070348443,0.00032859735,0.00033908672,0.000033891174,0.000062078936,0.9920068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018876347,0.00058704667,0.000030636736,0.00072946254,0.00028185543,7.259565e-7,0.00000960028,0.000012288617,0.99646074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920726,0.000106752,0.000103344864,0.00019990769,0.00022918932,0.00015352218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990441,0.00029323276,0.00016500955,0.0002074939,0.00019357644,0.000096565855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036042716,0.0001276993,0.00015242668,0.00007618253,0.0009464507,0.00017560818,0.0003023072,0.00020551408,0.00005022628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008731911,0.00011851399,0.00007061892,0.00001420006,0.0010078475,0.00019034324,0.000095913725,0.00051888067,0.000021596321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003049687,0.0000030863996,5.2329176e-7,0.0000041818844,0.000034910423,0.000014425194,0.001054806,2.9508012e-8,5.815547e-7,0.9137377,0.08420083,0.00091839646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039853246,0.0000049837367,0.0000043330615,0.000017483413,0.000104298386,0.0000045438765,0.0010252747,0.0000016859998,0.0000019338431,0.0003311451,0.997963,0.000142762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004792992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010863918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9137622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010990534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004054273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72794294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480616741","doi":"","title":"A Quarter Century, Not a Raised Voice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UKnowledge (University of Kentucky)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); History","score_opus":0.02706064526348537,"score_gpt":0.2918643942251525,"score_spread":0.2648037489616671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480616741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14838657,0.00007218176,0.0013432059,0.0697257,0.0015072986,0.00030764737,0.000012695957,0.00013320935,0.77851146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880308,0.00006523065,0.0012496051,0.0002500674,0.00011864723,2.7341468e-7,0.0000058210435,0.0000045493884,0.010275035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925494,0.00010210052,0.000092909366,0.00015565354,0.00021450387,0.0001798874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991546,0.000090851994,0.00012724262,0.00016610058,0.00034913872,0.00011206319],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034261277,0.00006332324,0.000103018545,0.00014801434,0.0005690316,0.000031653235,0.00027054004,0.00008357513,0.0015457333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025019137,0.00008265364,0.00007166582,0.0006900688,0.00022898056,0.0006504919,0.00003245575,0.00018295724,0.00063689676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016101263,0.0009720219,0.0011149965,0.000044583336,0.00008805467,0.000015758404,0.41354558,0.00000888885,0.0010673603,0.42958173,0.14582631,0.0075737145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069784303,0.000028596227,0.0024945475,0.000020158279,0.000020310797,4.2147366e-7,0.054230258,0.0000038775665,0.000053117543,0.0009020824,0.94144386,0.000104934705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006503384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018964957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8396442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001653751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007996803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482438775","doi":"","title":"A Tribute to Andrew W. McThenia, Jr.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Surprise; Silence; Humility; Law; Conversation; Revelation; Art history; Classics; Philosophy; Sociology; History; Theology; Aesthetics; Political science","score_opus":0.05333455671530522,"score_gpt":0.39506169587541057,"score_spread":0.34172713916010533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482438775","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034633074,0.016714798,0.000052242143,0.6544375,0.00038556624,0.00055176177,0.000004101573,0.000089415385,0.32430136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30528668,0.2616974,0.0025380102,0.31620228,0.0013044367,0.00016700794,0.000037329715,0.0000390639,0.11272778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904305,0.00019126628,0.00021027081,0.00016331638,0.00019255317,0.00019952242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936044,0.00012557516,0.00007273731,0.00015221174,0.00011203384,0.00017701939],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012483592,0.00007701661,0.00017267361,0.000028266939,0.00050618977,0.00021355422,0.00014219365,0.0000444307,0.0014963419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006616773,0.00006769285,0.00003947235,0.0006222033,0.000071167495,0.00049114943,0.000022124035,0.00018661945,0.00037190452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004703073,0.000054915257,0.00020958019,0.00013613321,0.000010205239,0.0000028421118,0.0033734585,5.3425783e-8,0.000018852033,0.73363316,0.1793331,0.083223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074989795,0.00001412947,0.0001098148,0.00034200403,0.000022624092,0.000004091722,0.00018985405,4.3322711e-7,0.0000039671936,0.0009496184,0.9981901,0.000098384524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042151106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037326198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81885695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034710556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014263757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482523054","doi":"10.22329/celt.v6i0.3734","title":"15. Real Life and the Classroom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Merge (version control); Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Perception; Psychology; Identity (music); Reflection (computer programming); Critical reflection; Sociology; Computer science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.01742221662078548,"score_gpt":0.3197280660783272,"score_spread":0.30230584945754174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482523054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3841685,0.00006735514,0.00008651288,0.050960913,0.00013173638,0.0001852407,2.437706e-7,0.00010334261,0.5642961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97538435,0.00014492653,0.0001658937,0.0008891242,0.00018096121,0.000030441639,0.0000022020313,0.000007218231,0.023194877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983921,0.0010243172,0.00012460543,0.00013883528,0.00015693512,0.0001632087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801993,0.0016458203,0.00009348006,0.000065178574,0.00008071537,0.000094848074],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013135367,0.00006775477,0.000093861905,0.000072164476,0.0032114708,0.0006310075,0.00007068701,0.00006415651,0.0002853328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006303296,0.000049040547,0.000016086737,0.00020417916,0.00021505395,0.0002908074,0.000021210037,0.000963667,0.00003742717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036948895,0.000044157412,0.012780142,0.000005494716,0.000029728604,3.9132985e-7,0.054940555,0.000015120493,0.0000377214,0.88790697,0.019444186,0.024758587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001605904,0.000087132175,0.031433493,0.0000426382,0.000032669326,0.0000034362076,0.06719589,0.002600119,0.000002280121,0.008462758,0.8882566,0.00027706323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010991569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029289586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8794442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002674779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021319432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484134142","doi":"","title":"The Path from Problem to Scholarship: Two Voices","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Path (computing); Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.041827560605358,"score_gpt":0.41296047709507483,"score_spread":0.3711329164897168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484134142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038614836,0.000040136678,0.00014244235,0.42232594,0.00027221857,0.00015775388,0.0000015309835,0.00006989128,0.53837526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96142334,0.000018874309,0.004618966,0.013248627,0.00035932427,0.000010159388,0.0000023720631,0.0000021139374,0.020316249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993106,0.00012181843,0.000106816304,0.00009716042,0.00021682588,0.00014674618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992774,0.0003242077,0.00004214127,0.00012771653,0.00014765756,0.00008084546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008006192,0.00003747031,0.00003280832,0.000021296928,0.0010447047,0.00069337426,0.00023351358,0.000023782934,0.0006385955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082176883,0.000024981839,0.000015291045,0.00045627606,0.000032911135,0.0006682209,0.000008785839,0.00016414284,0.0006229675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048192032,0.000046332516,0.0013559492,1.3972561e-7,0.0000045257907,2.0452117e-7,0.014840989,0.0000016815003,0.00018616181,0.8702575,0.041707616,0.07159408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040251954,0.000010871652,0.0093400655,0.0000025096592,0.000002464025,4.365229e-8,0.0044035446,0.0000013456861,0.000050940438,0.04868378,0.9374178,0.000046350604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009375444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011975795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92280847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003627468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003145333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99722123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485565449","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1414024","title":"Cowboy Jurists &amp; the Making of Legal Professionalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04417401958455262,"score_gpt":0.4215565461046336,"score_spread":0.377382526520081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485565449","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14759606,0.0018703984,0.0026162372,0.7260876,0.0011576642,0.0002754889,0.0000017443183,0.000044860477,0.12034991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98550487,0.00026601486,0.000094199684,0.0017880782,0.0004467692,0.000001783655,0.0000015202859,0.000003947817,0.011892805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982527,0.00028516675,0.0002288284,0.000072193274,0.00038388942,0.00077722396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992658,0.00009296846,0.00027248554,0.00010705372,0.00024246756,0.000019257093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035777036,0.000057238558,0.000074370815,0.000063001025,0.0009244236,0.0001159681,0.00029996267,0.000049995015,0.0001688149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006020195,0.00003984529,0.000056096604,0.00042845003,0.00009197084,0.00049572816,0.000008678822,0.0018615683,0.000024127054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012445775,0.00005770907,0.00015449579,5.6452e-7,0.000016364798,2.0916117e-7,0.0058723623,0.0000024665314,0.000089135196,0.97551763,0.004818594,0.013458037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009532492,0.00002772285,0.0009966118,0.000010250133,0.000011656827,0.00003138939,0.012630045,0.0000013202272,0.0000063676516,0.30563375,0.6805026,0.000052975283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038574784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003348475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8379088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034482995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0091183875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486099690","doi":"","title":"Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Future of Self-Regulation—Canada between the United States and the English /Australian Experience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Centennial; Legal profession; Accountability; Political science; Legal ethics; Independence (probability theory); Discipline; Professional responsibility; Legal service; Law; Public administration; Medicine","score_opus":0.01616329704702252,"score_gpt":0.2905029206359261,"score_spread":0.27433962358890357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486099690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8710615,0.00060320855,0.000054319786,0.12762891,0.00013603139,0.00017492233,0.0000055974397,0.0000108265285,0.00032468428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99415016,0.0034038976,0.000016923388,0.00036811616,0.0009522424,0.00000702775,0.00000574245,0.0000052441164,0.0010906622],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982544,0.0004954743,0.00023469364,0.00009194536,0.0003767917,0.00054667646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840707,0.0008745678,0.0002504259,0.00011843519,0.00028967703,0.00005984204],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020453946,0.000082463244,0.00010953636,0.00004126908,0.0021491358,0.00013736814,0.0002945051,0.000047283233,0.000030053028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032657507,0.00004209871,0.00002503828,0.00061122177,0.00034915417,0.00033037158,0.000021397555,0.0012978499,4.2931185e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064899024,0.0000314287,0.18260002,0.0000061855226,0.00041585756,5.968561e-7,0.45014784,0.0000834004,0.0000033386114,0.34959215,0.012721282,0.0043329797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005655456,0.000037298032,0.07850065,0.0000065163767,0.00007790829,0.000028897432,0.28892326,0.000027257207,0.000010531893,0.016166732,0.6155485,0.00010693392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11860019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17156252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6028272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021325873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005138499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491539208","doi":"","title":"Sex Discrimination in the Legal Profession: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ValpoScholar (Valparaiso University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Legal profession; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11396173995862537,"score_gpt":0.328615772026623,"score_spread":0.21465403206799766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491539208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2536242,0.00024826173,0.0001406282,0.030173788,0.0003309318,0.00031986984,0.00000183923,0.000054858156,0.7151056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795465,0.00007141081,0.00030157037,0.00024321035,0.00007053506,0.0000018351524,0.0000024216463,0.000004269445,0.01975828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859333,0.0007577565,0.000103829065,0.00018643857,0.00022132952,0.00013731093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994448,0.00016888388,0.0000824825,0.00013081683,0.000114379865,0.000058658392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009123324,0.000072169634,0.000084170766,0.00025153634,0.00073374156,0.00009648402,0.00025276054,0.000080896745,0.00011107082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003669268,0.000063022606,0.00002974227,0.00083071116,0.00015940044,0.0020944306,0.000031335872,0.0004540936,0.000013595293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038227063,0.00026628474,0.010759124,0.0000042943584,0.00000824093,0.000025234978,0.31491315,8.6769504e-8,0.00003243429,0.66942877,0.0037462777,0.00077789347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021989972,0.000031077383,0.020743791,0.0000073379606,0.000011132329,0.000002048379,0.28829268,0.000002886016,0.000010871272,0.00053408765,0.69005656,0.00008761708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008936735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009733492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7259223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003073932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004783626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99766284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492520929","doi":"10.29173/alr22","title":"Judicial Fundraising in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.10231751106640614,"score_gpt":0.39393912670160347,"score_spread":0.29162161563519734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492520929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012920869,0.0073088855,0.0000013974957,0.16230161,0.0006637571,0.00017360316,5.4912323e-7,0.000005114086,0.828253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94851106,0.002829781,0.00006943672,0.045828957,0.00021495181,0.000019266978,0.000007403019,0.0000058613386,0.0025132617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918246,0.00018406703,0.0001906202,0.00008464064,0.0002116602,0.00014652364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933904,0.00028237904,0.00006933943,0.00010327097,0.00010304992,0.000102946324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006561578,0.00004227783,0.00011078536,0.000012449059,0.00011682505,0.000038816284,0.00011670151,0.000017619708,0.0005899415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019565867,0.000041339816,0.000013834061,0.00051585335,0.00003773931,0.00035476682,0.000010089915,0.00012874109,0.0001302329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.837695e-7,0.000014090666,0.0014987992,0.00003906096,0.0000028067777,0.0000015561347,0.0015451256,4.9849297e-7,1.7477002e-7,0.8928329,0.098007716,0.006056542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041956035,0.0000017677447,0.0001486217,0.00020896335,0.000006735786,7.3464355e-7,0.00039430146,7.042939e-7,4.8235546e-7,0.00072144164,0.9984188,0.000055465163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99966544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.947219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040683884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007215425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492537368","doi":"","title":"The Negotiator as Professional: Understanding the Competing Interests of a Representative Negotiator","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Expansive; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Public relations; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Dispute resolution; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05112167438961226,"score_gpt":0.3572585693835673,"score_spread":0.3061368949939551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492537368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16941835,0.000066576344,0.001840774,0.073983245,0.0010846354,0.00062492763,0.000041955478,0.00013960575,0.7527999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97569376,0.000018430357,0.00004538101,0.00025007504,0.00018351055,0.0000015307093,0.000019188976,0.00001724134,0.02377089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979818,0.00032400218,0.0003907103,0.00026777468,0.0005511529,0.000484583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940498,0.0045316066,0.0004036135,0.0003992622,0.00043290388,0.00018284045],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013812947,0.00018134029,0.00020300807,0.00025186906,0.0033950226,0.0004755939,0.00086792716,0.00009089192,0.00014412674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028418438,0.0001316698,0.00016800182,0.0020627198,0.0011234955,0.001434729,0.00034758725,0.0005954296,0.00003999607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024495297,0.00021598814,0.01519718,0.000008891652,0.00013368306,0.000018233028,0.024922457,0.0000088126,0.00007229331,0.93539655,0.02253347,0.0012475022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045334207,0.00006707076,0.0026221364,0.00005910597,0.000037841695,0.000009063299,0.43842828,0.000027833215,0.00008499827,0.0025756753,0.5554274,0.00020723548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018030718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045064585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93282086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004227108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006756928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492745871","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v22i1.406","title":"Clinic is the Basis for a Complete Legal Education: Quality Assurance, Learning Outcomes and the Clinical Method","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Experiential learning; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Legal profession; Reading (process); Quality (philosophy); Legal practice; Legal research; Law; Pedagogy; Medical education; Sociology; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3103317981614379,"score_gpt":0.6279572059074269,"score_spread":0.31762540774598896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492745871","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036233976,0.00050431746,0.007567579,0.8769312,0.03193865,0.00073483225,0.00002035203,0.000026849917,0.046042267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8905212,0.00070603535,0.026541566,0.045588575,0.011930456,0.00009887933,0.000021910493,0.000025678652,0.024565669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99090034,0.0044837785,0.0029436247,0.0002934067,0.0011640944,0.00021478489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595426,0.029690908,0.0034457366,0.00031570467,0.0066433847,0.00036170057],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03846988,0.00016573777,0.0005702221,0.0001463595,0.0005767728,0.0008806726,0.0010030293,0.00019465775,0.00026319822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10794687,0.00010300322,0.00060239644,0.0003502899,0.0008234061,0.0014976709,0.000070855465,0.0015215434,0.00004546014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012893904,0.0013591783,0.088279866,0.000009779088,0.0005604906,5.6878383e-7,0.00862522,0.000012209458,8.5164464e-7,0.48076198,0.1956667,0.22343378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016625503,0.00010426341,0.06670739,0.000042347383,0.00012455613,0.00002043528,0.013904263,0.000058748785,9.8266e-7,0.01262231,0.9046299,0.00012224735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031997997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005175234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85428727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014710892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017454365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9900976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493974835","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1246","title":"The First Women Lawyers: \"Piecemeal Progress and Circumscribed Success\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Legal profession; Sociology; Public relations; History","score_opus":0.024583178638408927,"score_gpt":0.349152384188517,"score_spread":0.3245692055501081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493974835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029485606,0.0006278382,0.00013184479,0.120486386,0.0013387019,0.0001774106,0.0000019436784,0.00004970434,0.8477006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963073,0.00022952037,0.00026983672,0.0012235575,0.0008522636,0.0000096943595,8.6955333e-7,0.000009256555,0.0010976644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985517,0.00012177103,0.00028533037,0.00011807342,0.0004316656,0.0004914582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867624,0.0004262952,0.00022179825,0.00011931189,0.0003031349,0.0002532135],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038976735,0.000084801504,0.00008608889,0.00004569402,0.0051251776,0.001373489,0.00029197082,0.00007644654,0.00028403976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033665414,0.00006325181,0.000030995325,0.00032104892,0.0005750379,0.00095438765,0.000028119708,0.0006057448,0.000027477457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028113964,0.000058523652,0.007635315,0.0000033012373,0.00002716952,0.000009233841,0.015356661,3.420996e-7,0.0000054649777,0.96175915,0.0020097427,0.013106955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026257624,0.00003309573,0.0062283766,0.000013003519,0.000009221881,0.000049529946,0.017193582,0.0000023898199,0.000016326456,0.032284535,0.9438,0.00010737992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015806017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2601517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96682173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018569807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032624166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494399948","doi":"","title":"Law: A Profession, Not a Life","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Headline; Law; Legal education; Legal profession; Practice of law; Professional responsibility; Political science; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.04306044691882384,"score_gpt":0.3645422509587772,"score_spread":0.32148180403995336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494399948","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03337125,0.0012545652,0.00074767426,0.54942465,0.0014057758,0.0002051974,0.0000010405844,0.00009857621,0.41349128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95303255,0.001617875,0.0000701376,0.004798302,0.00088777265,0.0000069176494,5.6739196e-7,0.000007898853,0.039577976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793774,0.000245041,0.00019579055,0.00009385327,0.000330604,0.0011969968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993277,0.00010306515,0.00014977776,0.00008965587,0.00019811415,0.00013167513],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00225106,0.000061671475,0.00007145499,0.000067794106,0.001339503,0.00018924123,0.00021195016,0.00006745492,0.00169914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093704235,0.000054743246,0.000046143356,0.00039201352,0.000089714966,0.0007676333,0.000010332214,0.0022713807,0.0004528475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005222619,0.00007296395,0.00014029744,6.166741e-7,0.000020123336,4.1804506e-7,0.0066835666,4.821468e-7,0.00001999565,0.9791868,0.008271025,0.0055985358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021811332,0.000042341795,0.000073015995,0.000006500597,0.000012205878,0.00002644095,0.026784968,0.000012904523,0.000007734407,0.12552957,0.8471871,0.000099125435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016851034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008446509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9196613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050740887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047130403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495515455","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4538","title":"Creeping Capitalism and Academic Culture at a Canadian Law School","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Corporatization; Scholarship; Restructuring; Commodification; Academic freedom; Marketization; Capitalism; Autonomy; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Law; Higher education; Economy; Economics","score_opus":0.09399959374712731,"score_gpt":0.3947832737597534,"score_spread":0.3007836800126261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495515455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39903304,0.00038267838,0.000018642522,0.037995268,0.0005323701,0.00043342958,0.00002438389,0.000049799775,0.56153035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809325,0.00016791248,0.00047720305,0.009376314,0.00048058762,0.000015669706,0.0000048154066,0.0000101575915,0.008534859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990522,0.00006970104,0.00018770895,0.00017491984,0.00025756643,0.0002578856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897796,0.00011028575,0.00009588625,0.00013402279,0.00022564914,0.00045620522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002946769,0.000079584715,0.00010800984,0.00013714093,0.000871371,0.00010610204,0.00032361716,0.00013985804,0.00070980185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011042744,0.000084366795,0.000020379895,0.00043104604,0.00022164252,0.0011322915,0.000064178836,0.00033772457,0.00015204262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057740144,0.00006747971,0.025526468,0.00013382206,0.000071984316,0.00003827539,0.19290406,0.000056602956,0.0016645498,0.46951956,0.30913645,0.00082303194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014488239,0.000016195903,0.021391584,0.000040286333,0.000058756177,0.0000107156275,0.0046294588,0.00000533611,0.00019171897,0.0003367945,0.973001,0.0001732425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4158115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22609837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66386455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019079869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010550119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7880233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497090025","doi":"","title":"Workplace and Policy Ethics: A Call to End the Solitudes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Politics; Corporate governance; Political science; Government (linguistics); Cronyism; Divergence (linguistics); Business ethics; Convergence (economics); Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Public relations; Political economy; Law; Economics; Management; Economic growth","score_opus":0.031366069205509106,"score_gpt":0.40689831466032306,"score_spread":0.37553224545481395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497090025","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024195615,0.0008474112,0.0009528438,0.92811155,0.000118339805,0.00010492426,5.831689e-7,0.00001940736,0.04564934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96345484,0.0026183107,0.00021236415,0.010627738,0.0019149432,0.0000056720987,2.8378696e-7,0.000006156669,0.021159707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981945,0.00029972117,0.00014070504,0.000089486115,0.0002814112,0.0009941653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914294,0.00043498585,0.000078006895,0.00008398057,0.00015080103,0.0001092614],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053620692,0.000059059526,0.000056002387,0.000093404306,0.0013923525,0.00033801698,0.00021690795,0.000068578775,0.000101218466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022020263,0.000043288124,0.00002488296,0.00046809154,0.000119068056,0.0004071821,0.000020104106,0.0030565807,0.00006895308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007424394,0.000019933581,0.0001661023,5.215676e-7,0.000015821573,9.743667e-8,0.031060642,0.000008537954,0.0000200848,0.9380951,0.001989693,0.02861602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008977979,0.00002982574,0.00041748432,0.0000049630426,0.000008924033,0.000040263276,0.02087208,0.000003063757,0.0000061735036,0.097226575,0.88123417,0.000066684406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055287387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073361255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93925923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077233824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0147759225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497391720","doi":"10.53300/001c.6224","title":"International and Comparative Indigenous Rights Via Video Conferencing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Aotearoa; Videoconferencing; Globe; Indigenous rights; Situated; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering; Psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.06621100589952023,"score_gpt":0.4378553727430629,"score_spread":0.3716443668435427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497391720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009539996,0.015290655,0.00027289664,0.19745164,0.0026863834,0.0008869204,0.000003631323,0.00009046359,0.7737774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95578736,0.009732953,0.0014415899,0.023055155,0.00077976903,0.00005425166,0.000057910856,0.0000033990843,0.009087594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989689,0.00018422556,0.00028412242,0.00017799197,0.000242133,0.00014261986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989964,0.00010062398,0.00020105287,0.00012783735,0.00045894895,0.000115153445],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051353744,0.00009146968,0.00015975372,0.00009094829,0.00049498,0.000250073,0.000173642,0.000045072353,0.0012740397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028266638,0.000086296845,0.000031971304,0.00040446263,0.00007483747,0.001028133,0.000008315579,0.00023298647,0.00015268712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004822608,0.00038623964,0.00029015398,0.000074642376,0.000026794854,6.0387686e-7,0.037238188,3.1363416e-7,0.000036302386,0.7080624,0.06995645,0.18392308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004895678,0.000014975399,0.0025138399,0.00024932125,0.000022075266,0.000006990561,0.0011019818,0.0000024779536,0.00001025597,0.003390465,0.99253154,0.00010713043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053972034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005100933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9462474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012442227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014315962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499385902","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i3.2246","title":"Classifying and Analyzing Analogies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Analogical reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Inductive reasoning; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Psychology","score_opus":0.10003130450068803,"score_gpt":0.40196325531168026,"score_spread":0.3019319508109922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499385902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1121756,0.00008850744,0.00044004148,0.017445378,0.00020818341,0.00005587071,5.812883e-7,0.000083690495,0.8695021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946687,0.0002730816,0.0007461173,0.0016174171,0.00012362836,0.000003891847,0.0000027059095,0.0000015505688,0.0025629038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995334,0.000029440414,0.0001184744,0.0000551762,0.00010616393,0.0001573367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964076,0.000120089695,0.00006132632,0.000055291242,0.00007403439,0.00004851934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042097946,0.00003932659,0.000047595324,0.00008319973,0.00052322214,0.00022474627,0.00007483994,0.000044458597,0.00037924663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005928067,0.000034925142,0.000014101683,0.00043366817,0.00011534963,0.0013115632,0.000019788658,0.0001421265,0.00006490243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086319205,0.0000196291,0.09010726,0.0000044351164,0.000011163347,0.0000038809267,0.015460687,0.000020716054,0.000023279119,0.81781125,0.002326508,0.07420254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060711987,0.000011846089,0.042853948,0.0000030671922,0.0000046960104,0.0000044334774,0.01082116,0.00004628045,0.0000039409674,0.003076592,0.9430425,0.00007081624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007569636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076674926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020697516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015908497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41524848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500599573","doi":"","title":"Precarious Liability: The High Court in Lepore, Samin and Rich on School Responsibility for Assaults by Teachers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Tort; Vicarious liability; Law; Plaintiff; Political science; Liability; Legislation; Skepticism; High Court; Jurisprudence; Sociology","score_opus":0.15325772867855983,"score_gpt":0.4529972014882455,"score_spread":0.2997394728096857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500599573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91230094,0.000048775753,0.00002826808,0.07927449,0.0002758973,0.0018020893,0.00040709882,0.000060305618,0.005802124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93804926,0.00018252598,0.0009957362,0.00026352805,0.00017293749,0.000021167958,0.00013669107,0.000020712483,0.06015747],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930836,0.003642554,0.0003928229,0.00076448056,0.0011711799,0.0009453635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381596,0.003930134,0.0001821082,0.0006187287,0.0010152117,0.0004378825],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009706732,0.0002456949,0.0003095636,0.00049281295,0.0015211542,0.00031512624,0.00062076893,0.0003904004,0.00027033951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011903637,0.00021373575,0.00007483069,0.0021520588,0.001083916,0.0006602429,0.000089990106,0.002241863,0.00003306697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023445487,0.0036648905,0.34213263,0.00011068306,0.00020357835,0.00005658749,0.03348627,0.00013117905,0.00026611134,0.12156043,0.4924707,0.0035723862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019117253,0.00034055076,0.17557442,0.00004542358,0.00003205787,0.000002778963,0.028853985,0.000016846838,0.000058552796,0.0026567122,0.7901965,0.0003104522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03444232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07276255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2977258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092294894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024427283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502083875","doi":"","title":"Legal Education in Asia: Globalization, Change and Contexts – In Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Globalization; Legal history; Vocational education; State (computer science); Legal profession; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04517568385182079,"score_gpt":0.37183215620557186,"score_spread":0.32665647235375106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502083875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10967928,0.18506637,0.0005000141,0.2070072,0.0020403417,0.001765796,0.0000022850547,0.000059226502,0.4938795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90547526,0.0903198,0.000053704076,0.002035877,0.00019956946,0.000023454362,0.0000027144852,0.000004902143,0.0018847398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868035,0.00025453765,0.00024085776,0.00009781409,0.00014167701,0.0005847861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957424,0.000026389964,0.0001411203,0.00005814527,0.00015006245,0.000050016948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026863932,0.00005726954,0.000092100774,0.000143558,0.00015587352,0.00005618478,0.0001117936,0.000048214617,0.00013985802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005497021,0.000057688652,0.000015731948,0.0006624531,0.000046811667,0.0011609913,0.000007439856,0.00084489177,0.000013514001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004596324,0.00010045438,0.016863173,0.000009783383,0.0000039166866,4.5678803e-7,0.004152811,1.5709904e-8,7.678902e-7,0.91888285,0.00066050014,0.059320696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043656316,0.00007372268,0.068367,0.00048273304,0.000022795992,0.00011309777,0.026024183,0.0000018420988,0.0000022986733,0.24700937,0.6572558,0.00021059488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016483353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11203377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.795796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006590199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00987822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504247832","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511815300.005","title":"Legal education and the politics of law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ruler; Politics; Scholarship; Law; Political science; Legitimacy; State (computer science); Subordination (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03620735046111998,"score_gpt":0.28486267030804185,"score_spread":0.24865531984692188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504247832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005986799,0.00034116895,0.000013973388,0.0015239998,0.0004457943,0.00024549512,0.000040091112,0.000020504185,0.9973091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03252908,0.00015630868,0.000050519433,0.00041047175,0.0003499311,5.8055866e-7,0.000013120738,0.000008654541,0.9664813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993606,0.00009903608,0.00011785629,0.00011136442,0.00018468988,0.0001264199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989355,0.00023164334,0.00023303182,0.00019935028,0.00031242167,0.00008802389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030369067,0.00009509608,0.00013833625,0.00006403875,0.00057085365,0.00006624413,0.0002050106,0.00015658632,0.000015740592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005597393,0.000090934394,0.000057184625,0.00000936895,0.0012828262,0.0002630006,0.00006625418,0.0003269937,0.0000046809305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012979549,0.000012012826,0.0000011013599,0.00001540692,0.000029099687,3.5027125e-7,0.0022889224,2.0454195e-8,9.1991996e-7,0.97966623,0.017107656,0.0008653057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000172922,0.0000039852202,0.0000066364214,0.000024554953,0.00013732373,0.0000019032491,0.0011397774,4.4179475e-7,0.000011507786,0.00037011396,0.9980355,0.000095337484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021909159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093847826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009642718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009534257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98460406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504315326","doi":"10.5430/wje.v5n3p91","title":"Counselling Strategies for Curbing Examination Malpractices in Secondary Schools in Enugu State, Nigeria","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cronbach's alpha; Malpractice; Stratified sampling; Medical education; Psychology; Sample (material); Family medicine; Medicine; Political science; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Law","score_opus":0.07362996609777571,"score_gpt":0.4200072839731512,"score_spread":0.34637731787537546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504315326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9151222,0.0010151766,0.0015481939,0.028360434,0.004263922,0.00043789434,0.000002523186,0.0000120315,0.049237605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937504,0.00017512178,0.0033605571,0.00032462526,0.0005102988,0.000023098379,0.0000074890986,0.000007714087,0.0018406765],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985754,0.00035609637,0.0005346291,0.000094286195,0.0002775612,0.00016201164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976194,0.00054725155,0.00071259437,0.00006715359,0.00096257974,0.000091059854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048999176,0.00006804651,0.0001230601,0.0007490391,0.00012236176,0.00043306773,0.0001430683,0.000040761213,0.00009701956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015667607,0.00007350505,0.000025521154,0.0010475572,0.000034666533,0.0048536323,0.0000029143912,0.0005132478,0.000007037222],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035724093,0.0019673388,0.089709096,0.00011493949,0.00004559719,0.0000055938826,0.5142982,0.0018621536,0.0008699221,0.13356264,0.04817058,0.20903668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069608947,0.00006599018,0.027251678,0.00019538529,0.000010392181,0.0000063521165,0.34835052,0.000032741154,0.00007208397,0.06379281,0.55935574,0.0001701875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013448017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014202445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51118517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044682366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009836252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W150828450","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2737","title":"Book Note: Indispensable Counsel: The Chief Legal Officer In The New Reality, by E Norman Veasey and Christine T Di Guglielmo","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Law; Political science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.019776549362517302,"score_gpt":0.33359918458753085,"score_spread":0.3138226352250135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W150828450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013223636,0.00072043855,0.00022196639,0.29289138,0.00040144028,0.00016836764,0.000007562404,0.000017989594,0.7042485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721958,0.0004230133,0.00007521449,0.020926122,0.0011103419,0.000005634356,0.000008769597,0.0000106397,0.005244447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981064,0.0006211792,0.00031151198,0.00013886073,0.0005190562,0.00030296724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987659,0.00050821726,0.00024737994,0.000206143,0.00012426915,0.00014810548],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032806431,0.000110287925,0.000120507175,0.00003732137,0.0018137988,0.0011133632,0.00044303443,0.00008543525,0.000677719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048314448,0.00006931845,0.00003806683,0.00031542417,0.00027829738,0.0009808518,0.00002675431,0.001014478,0.00004279364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000161006,0.00007909485,0.00027696165,0.0000024027804,0.000007810529,0.0000021284818,0.005962257,0.0000070520623,0.000025909638,0.53732896,0.45513347,0.0011578512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034252385,0.000030997227,0.001249823,0.00001429716,0.000020035157,0.000055715926,0.0011921272,0.00007117659,0.000008169209,0.0071185404,0.98979557,0.00010102827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17116182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3288152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006275105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005854265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W150857943","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.1834","title":"Winning–Or at Least Not Losing–On Cross-Examination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kimberly-Clark (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Cross-examination; Active listening; Computer science; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Communication; Witness","score_opus":0.10187039147774475,"score_gpt":0.44671963972164647,"score_spread":0.34484924824390173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W150857943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010800401,0.0039459886,0.000026234971,0.25302824,0.0007938894,0.0010682679,0.0000052038695,0.00012901818,0.73020273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84119064,0.008917713,0.0004284507,0.048156776,0.0004748443,0.00019108188,0.000024842118,0.000019887639,0.100595795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987595,0.00029997926,0.00023367048,0.00017683649,0.0003320059,0.00019797802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885076,0.0003167993,0.00019036552,0.00020949246,0.00034221518,0.000090346504],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001129785,0.00008872528,0.00013716736,0.000025494606,0.000751362,0.00030834173,0.00015291267,0.000056217108,0.012667532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017099825,0.000070946306,0.00004649179,0.00049372774,0.00018094866,0.0009184189,0.000022469172,0.00018000815,0.005681051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006355852,0.00013519939,0.0008927154,0.00049321936,0.000014097417,0.0000011404569,0.003315188,0.0000010439545,0.00009603223,0.80637175,0.1319178,0.056755483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060016937,0.00001741156,0.0029906838,0.00044954792,0.000013874671,0.0000014243137,0.0001218456,0.0000024051149,0.000059626098,0.0001582508,0.9960217,0.0001032505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002818613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009622474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86410385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016595967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016897575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99509317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510045863","doi":"10.29173/alr342","title":"The End(s) of Self-Regulation?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Commonwealth; Context (archaeology); Political science; State (computer science); Democracy; Regulatory state; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.04185639294426426,"score_gpt":0.3699808382412045,"score_spread":0.32812444529694024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510045863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073268224,0.012430909,0.0000037632399,0.153002,0.00027323604,0.0002855261,5.136144e-7,0.000017633243,0.83325374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.871611,0.09670493,0.00030932063,0.008252008,0.00018730412,0.000047291436,0.00000700845,0.0000075057696,0.022873642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922687,0.00019702286,0.00022043951,0.000066137196,0.0001930356,0.00009651273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844027,0.0010018618,0.00014945965,0.0001926633,0.0001814014,0.00003436309],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060408027,0.000039370578,0.00008794461,0.000007797122,0.0008197087,0.000020652204,0.00016415454,0.000022596854,0.0010283589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091210316,0.000027077589,0.000045250996,0.0004219433,0.0002541785,0.00027613423,0.000009675945,0.000079161764,0.00021110245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.184194e-7,0.0000284338,0.00016894205,0.00003134883,0.000009123685,5.205183e-8,0.0014625848,5.1258688e-8,8.943738e-7,0.9718432,0.02432715,0.002127914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026471043,0.0000034219947,0.0005345106,0.0000700923,0.000018036537,0.0000017780178,0.000049599224,6.274733e-7,0.000006948822,0.00077838934,0.99847513,0.000034992205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023335548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014724851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.974148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020680538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038344678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510362251","doi":"","title":"Beyond the Numbers: What We Know — and Should Know — About American Pro Bono","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economic Justice; Political science; Private sector; Recession; Legal profession; Need to know; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.02025271180653884,"score_gpt":0.3449338871162781,"score_spread":0.3246811753097393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510362251","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06735559,0.02114215,0.00027149153,0.8532764,0.0010217096,0.00048998103,9.1516097e-7,0.00005631193,0.056385458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84602433,0.12802556,0.00011710188,0.003489112,0.0010291104,0.00003835439,0.0000015996283,0.00001641058,0.021258416],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997797,0.00028764276,0.00021769904,0.00014621929,0.00033292072,0.0012185028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897563,0.0002501469,0.000253832,0.00013899163,0.00025900098,0.00012239792],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021082298,0.00010537675,0.00011188472,0.000069963644,0.0012846931,0.0014973128,0.00029607466,0.00005562704,0.00045463085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035833623,0.0000745027,0.000049028582,0.00057817035,0.00041228716,0.002531921,0.000023759381,0.0022850607,0.00014058879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000489807,0.00004706183,0.00088091247,0.0000012515586,0.000051120547,1.9583712e-7,0.010907525,5.95672e-7,0.000019154348,0.445856,0.00834888,0.5338824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010720873,0.000062622006,0.00072382024,0.000015854654,0.000019746647,0.000040563435,0.13019548,0.000008588296,0.0000049294363,0.1714553,0.69725806,0.00010782138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007177281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017446058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8497873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045536476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004900319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510884943","doi":"","title":"The European Commission Project Regarding Competition in Professional Services","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition law; Parliament; Commission; European union; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Political science; Law; European commission; Monopoly; Public administration; European Union law; Business; Economics; International trade; Politics","score_opus":0.02994575142871696,"score_gpt":0.3540007276017969,"score_spread":0.32405497617307993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510884943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03822899,0.00009702173,0.000009101969,0.07571778,0.0009856867,0.00032812657,0.000002160989,0.00009577963,0.8845354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838084,0.0000443042,0.00021615112,0.002403122,0.0004672658,0.000010974824,0.00001609193,0.0000063090947,0.013027371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980717,0.0010132892,0.0002273982,0.00014858483,0.0003201977,0.00021883397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992712,0.0002236191,0.00012492172,0.00017228929,0.00013511935,0.000072838695],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023222752,0.00007381008,0.000069977694,0.00005279213,0.0016701662,0.0004122321,0.00028951644,0.000047650352,0.00014679553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002968246,0.00005459839,0.00002835149,0.0005381687,0.000085151274,0.0008700231,0.000026214859,0.0004495769,0.00017872083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000196646,0.00011328034,0.0015717255,0.0000063358652,0.0000030975252,0.0000027054266,0.0059348927,0.0000039098672,0.0002281752,0.9785163,0.009478382,0.0041215313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018588886,0.000015075401,0.0252823,0.0000815036,0.0000028248833,9.2046355e-7,0.007751564,0.000013812471,0.000027621447,0.0049509914,0.9616008,0.00008670241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049851565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011448762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9735653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097154065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031784887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512736548","doi":"","title":"St. Thomas Aquinas, Law for the Common Good","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Obligation; Law; Philosophy of law; Political science; Philosophy; Positive law; Comparative law; Sociology; Epistemology; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.040717200570811386,"score_gpt":0.35527229515683345,"score_spread":0.31455509458602204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512736548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059162313,0.00657229,0.004152042,0.5495193,0.0018565103,0.000586063,0.00000811792,0.000081773454,0.43130767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631295,0.0018574231,0.00007941298,0.0018636291,0.0010583703,0.00001917198,0.0000017808342,0.000009786025,0.03198091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832577,0.00012660869,0.00017036204,0.00008202402,0.00023947252,0.0010557417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989964,0.0005421471,0.00014499322,0.00011742758,0.00014638307,0.000052667794],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028727364,0.00006379164,0.000069929076,0.000032602933,0.0022274142,0.00026306565,0.00032437075,0.000053091822,0.0004112564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031068586,0.00004612456,0.000071184746,0.00028586184,0.00012614511,0.0004927016,0.000009229921,0.0014814485,0.00005253095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050320928,0.000052776017,0.000098190045,5.9255245e-7,0.00003653334,1.2019794e-7,0.0024222254,0.0000020570487,0.000006592241,0.97193444,0.012261469,0.01317999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014892289,0.00005504232,0.000025272342,0.0000019335198,0.000021356333,0.000018893694,0.010448161,0.000026105912,0.0000056784247,0.25813422,0.7310615,0.000052886833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001922924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04007406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9572133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044907784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001408511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512860480","doi":"","title":"Ethics Teaching in Law School","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Mainstream; Legal education; Curriculum; Variety (cybernetics); Law; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Legal ethics; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Pedagogy; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03565017231796843,"score_gpt":0.4151396643483383,"score_spread":0.3794894920303699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512860480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044442628,0.0005475848,0.0015149765,0.4755055,0.00046803762,0.00010991753,2.9084907e-7,0.000048158017,0.4773629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886088,0.0007586551,0.0001886804,0.006074392,0.00053341157,0.0000010256113,8.175377e-7,0.0000037955324,0.0038304685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792135,0.00048382042,0.00018564943,0.00008076354,0.00028760772,0.0010407842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995063,0.00017906683,0.00009719452,0.00006744195,0.00007216927,0.000077845834],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009206916,0.000051553776,0.00006141317,0.00010035525,0.0010326138,0.00023016786,0.00019446801,0.0001005041,0.00011227986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022411414,0.00005096454,0.000030634,0.00029943782,0.000061803104,0.0009108377,0.0000043252076,0.00970879,0.000053017207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004281121,0.000051357718,0.00041622383,2.3400749e-7,0.0000044268454,5.965026e-7,0.0068657,0.000004246745,0.000027618371,0.9852485,0.00029922032,0.007077613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013957391,0.00004257076,0.00054275733,0.000008266804,0.0000035977828,0.000018328168,0.020808509,0.0000025931479,0.0000024977437,0.65756136,0.32080203,0.000067885594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004637034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0733746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9441661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011280625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010941743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513198725","doi":"","title":"Justice, morality and ethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-publications - Marquette  (Marquette University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Directorate for Biological Sciences; University of Cambridge; Nordiska Afrikainstitutet; European Commission; Strong; York University; University of Pennsylvania; Princeton University; Yale University; University of Oxford; Harvard University; World Bank Group","keywords":"Morality; Economic Justice; Meta-ethics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Nursing ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1839187723008418,"score_gpt":0.3783599560898036,"score_spread":0.1944411837889618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513198725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017625,0.000030902964,0.00090083556,0.47783002,0.000359456,0.00032147713,0.000103810526,0.0003417497,0.50248677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58203,0.0029887578,0.009964846,0.033504028,0.00085251115,0.00002361426,0.0006738201,0.00004023456,0.36992216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790496,0.0006118055,0.00023978276,0.00041051218,0.0004530531,0.0003798913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720234,0.00081689726,0.0002198259,0.00046671613,0.0009821949,0.000312036],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010638855,0.0001604071,0.00016064955,0.00065528834,0.0038588077,0.00021895659,0.00047855152,0.00027773,0.0018102162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025662642,0.0002000297,0.000065148655,0.0028893433,0.0009545977,0.0022762541,0.00010678545,0.0010259949,0.00022497766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009995545,0.00012922562,0.0025269082,0.000014266592,0.00003169356,0.000008024466,0.009595267,0.0000022321929,0.000025148134,0.73519456,0.25200748,0.00045518522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024290541,0.000011659184,0.010484633,0.000005360754,0.00007364532,0.000010609065,0.0046260036,0.000010836853,0.000010192411,0.0006059841,0.98368156,0.00023661651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028872425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015379397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73458856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002817378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021160643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514434797","doi":"","title":"Lulling Ourselves into a False Sense of Competence: Learning Outcomes and Clinical Legal Education in Canada, the United States and Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Legal education; Political science; Competence (human resources); Legal profession; Cornerstone; Curriculum; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04073341228787332,"score_gpt":0.34498401808903517,"score_spread":0.30425060580116187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514434797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97826296,0.00004197626,0.000004783838,0.020955177,0.00015583895,0.00019854512,0.0000040982804,0.000008410284,0.00036818054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965702,0.00013068772,0.0005740799,0.00025524703,0.000018780063,4.5777594e-7,0.000015972908,0.0000044015082,0.0024301186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984944,0.0006389699,0.0002366937,0.00017697754,0.00027621814,0.000176748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983057,0.0008120905,0.0002880622,0.00012492249,0.00034169867,0.00012754108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012629975,0.0000879054,0.0001853581,0.00018796297,0.0006143654,0.00007877306,0.00017503476,0.00008932502,0.00020668023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008683426,0.00008645176,0.00003357326,0.00056153943,0.0004757019,0.0010198422,0.00006962957,0.0005650757,0.000006547566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017480477,0.000051187177,0.98058236,0.000013845406,0.00002548346,0.0000010993442,0.014139003,0.000028178645,0.00009661397,0.0035494675,0.0002413397,0.0012539319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023668181,0.000019498566,0.8498639,0.000029683284,0.000025360983,0.0000013198598,0.13891315,0.00005616809,0.0000100504285,0.00041370915,0.010344823,0.000085634485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95965457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9210409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13071845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015439415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019936683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4725264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514496908","doi":"","title":"Democratic Rights and Social Science Evidence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Political science; Supreme court; Fundamental rights; Charter; Jurisprudence; Democracy; Law; Social rights; International human rights law; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.024909796536344203,"score_gpt":0.36602711046275554,"score_spread":0.3411173139264113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514496908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5752124,0.0011244403,0.013774816,0.18465936,0.0016013235,0.0002892599,4.4334308e-7,0.00010821198,0.2232297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99415237,0.00024070848,0.00010723096,0.00056572177,0.0006496095,0.0000021178837,1.3908955e-7,0.0000033162935,0.004278781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979681,0.00021911335,0.00014890172,0.00013059679,0.00042626305,0.0011070208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992285,0.00023323456,0.00013134126,0.00006158312,0.00026654315,0.00007881394],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075835995,0.000057015735,0.00006864796,0.00012370458,0.003443947,0.0004151894,0.0002709726,0.00003834635,0.00005598495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012909459,0.000049983613,0.000021541764,0.0005623483,0.00053257233,0.0016919333,0.000018100905,0.0012182395,0.000030745425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032208243,0.000012816914,0.00037241436,9.083368e-7,0.00000494927,7.914714e-8,0.0045848032,1.3120881e-7,0.00011535049,0.98364896,0.0003180817,0.010938263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107027634,0.000054234035,0.0010580737,0.000009571997,0.000014638938,0.00003464618,0.005151826,0.000022282808,0.000021182415,0.90015006,0.09327822,0.00009824514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008999106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027916087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41893995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057115837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008004455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99785346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514583382","doi":"","title":"A Counter-pedagogy for Social Justice: Core Skills for Community Lawyering","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Legal education; Curriculum; Class (philosophy); Political science; Pedagogy; Sociology; Identity (music); Legal profession; Economic Justice; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.10165354879816263,"score_gpt":0.41637446933044475,"score_spread":0.3147209205322821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514583382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2336927,0.00032942274,0.005170598,0.1463579,0.007793951,0.003686145,0.0006268924,0.0006703604,0.60167205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96658105,0.000027456139,0.0028376821,0.008443818,0.0020285607,0.00032493682,0.000056919627,0.000027067346,0.019672541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987519,0.00018967748,0.00027612163,0.00016197846,0.00022921857,0.000391137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774635,0.0012666094,0.00017383197,0.00021023588,0.000467123,0.0001358484],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012167102,0.00011863738,0.00016891754,0.000047636895,0.0040723854,0.00034667653,0.000355738,0.00015213918,0.001412473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021675217,0.00013276491,0.00010349509,0.00028825004,0.00023658323,0.00075933285,0.00003205498,0.0004965971,0.00016021532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023742698,0.00037493688,0.00016288081,0.000078927456,0.00003323796,3.4253347e-7,0.025810337,0.0000032784433,0.00014274094,0.7899372,0.17934889,0.004083474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047342278,0.00004975795,0.00018148094,0.00001344468,0.00006185586,8.5316617e-7,0.0121187745,0.00007233432,0.0000456075,0.006776724,0.9800333,0.0001724797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053550364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01780296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8006844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001775219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000269928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516498904","doi":"","title":"Leveraging Knowledge Assets: Can Law Reform Help?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Commission; Business; Intervention (counseling); Law reform; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.041266140739274385,"score_gpt":0.3503199683947291,"score_spread":0.30905382765545475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516498904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021468336,0.00022331213,0.000027919685,0.09700349,0.00092679873,0.00016730854,0.000007867521,0.00018711513,0.87998784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95069987,0.000035105106,0.0012293117,0.009771386,0.0018030184,0.000033267755,0.0000199355,0.000017762542,0.036390364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852765,0.00018815526,0.00028916288,0.00025407155,0.00032552582,0.0004154299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988819,0.00014377254,0.000121841935,0.00030245946,0.000274888,0.0002751588],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010451778,0.0001275486,0.00013452201,0.000064984364,0.0014385859,0.0004995019,0.000338037,0.000118488366,0.002862405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034807553,0.0001287505,0.000060491446,0.00059402053,0.00021676281,0.001549693,0.000044763616,0.000550214,0.0020635994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003607541,0.00010755044,0.00037375212,0.0000052528876,0.000013735348,0.0000010711703,0.01039191,0.000003387927,0.00007303208,0.9678764,0.017420644,0.003729679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019101986,0.000010368207,0.00042771958,0.00001827946,0.000010906287,0.0000019735087,0.004526957,0.000008502773,0.0002847203,0.002489677,0.9918447,0.0001851604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08183086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23288456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97442406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008125619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091107306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516728616","doi":"10.3968/5226","title":"Study on Human Rights in Charity Activities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Ignorance; Conscience; Political science; Law; Variety (cybernetics); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.2790077746278651,"score_gpt":0.5581169405698471,"score_spread":0.279109165941982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516728616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9229675,0.000016080434,6.9493115e-7,0.0040951967,0.0005972623,0.00014879699,3.5923088e-7,0.0000102706435,0.072163865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994428,0.000006475712,0.00003968159,0.00018018961,0.000066565335,0.000026052814,1.2008515e-7,9.716699e-7,0.00023709901],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987128,0.00040890835,0.00019824792,0.00020737387,0.00025138303,0.00022133107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880886,0.0008096786,0.00011216297,0.00012508746,0.00012316625,0.000021033213],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048350734,0.000054593856,0.00016386955,0.00023994349,0.0011676765,0.000008323272,0.00031587563,0.000041593437,0.000020233705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019785166,0.00004755291,0.0000127494,0.0007395397,0.027647577,0.00038727408,0.000061145045,0.00026774476,0.0000061385076],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022805968,0.00022558268,0.044421714,0.0000016805661,0.000003452756,3.9451263e-7,0.56040853,0.000002035471,0.000073539486,0.39466277,0.00013636057,0.000061649735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020591063,0.00016763298,0.18394513,0.000013320434,0.0000021467579,8.829439e-8,0.76729393,0.0000010435508,0.00007100396,0.044165574,0.0040599494,0.00007425375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031630853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01116478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3504972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017065227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019077495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9749986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518131124","doi":"","title":"Legal Barriers to Innovation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Business; Exploit; Product (mathematics); Scale (ratio); State (computer science); Legal service; Service (business); Legal profession; Service provider; Public relations; Law and economics; Marketing; Law; Economics; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.016157647564763327,"score_gpt":0.35749626755486075,"score_spread":0.3413386199900974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518131124","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20304859,0.00013378846,0.0094484715,0.5581031,0.0010874554,0.00022658218,9.637021e-7,0.000092964285,0.22785808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97785944,0.0001456555,0.0002213573,0.00838208,0.0007633944,0.0000023582643,0.0000018462672,0.000004820403,0.012619031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811536,0.00011422149,0.00022265069,0.00009950928,0.00031165438,0.0011365954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992281,0.000035679514,0.0001156339,0.000080813465,0.00038300085,0.00015675752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031776791,0.000062619336,0.00006343173,0.00027200143,0.0010087058,0.000294579,0.0002051227,0.00005282453,0.00035901263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023795338,0.00006320033,0.000027540662,0.001777674,0.000029354665,0.0009912455,0.000004668327,0.001559253,0.00011065261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010802473,0.000017756807,0.00014226785,1.18744246e-7,0.000008968919,3.5700694e-7,0.0026842123,0.000006114802,0.00020930909,0.96145076,0.004592292,0.030877061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010806866,0.00010288309,0.00037924462,0.000002625154,0.0000055016376,0.000020293355,0.015631665,0.0000014615246,0.00003358333,0.246306,0.73732287,0.00008581755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000778574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019967568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77481085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009752081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017641578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9879275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518760746","doi":"","title":"Winners and Losers in the Globalization of Legal Services: Offshoring the Market for Foreign Lawyers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; University of Southern California; Brigham Young University; Hamline University; University of Pittsburgh; St Mary's University; University of Connecticut; Georgetown University; University of Denver; Case Western Reserve University; University of Minnesota; Southern Methodist University; Wake Forest University; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Michigan State University; Emory University; Temple University; Valparaiso University; University of Pennsylvania; Santa Clara University; Vanderbilt University; York University; University of Miami; Northwestern University; Pennsylvania State University; Florida State University","keywords":"Offshoring; Globalization; Internationalization; Legal service; Legal education; Business; Offshore outsourcing; Legal profession; Staffing; Legal research; Practice of law; Law; Market economy; Political science; Outsourcing; International trade; Economics","score_opus":0.023916356763643336,"score_gpt":0.3519499048649326,"score_spread":0.32803354810128926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518760746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067559585,0.000042348605,0.0005530429,0.11776312,0.0001187586,0.00061473646,0.0000035039907,0.000015320835,0.8133296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943419,0.000031321324,0.00074095454,0.0031688155,0.00011016013,0.000026204887,0.000003076808,0.0000023415553,0.0015751868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945354,0.00010581472,0.00012973639,0.00006669755,0.00014433794,0.000099855286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994175,0.00033696115,0.000067135355,0.00007892016,0.00008488886,0.00001460763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012621284,0.000036215526,0.000040638664,0.000029852124,0.00024856057,0.00010893802,0.00015569633,0.000027946178,0.00011738688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014787566,0.000021881102,0.000015415311,0.00040884395,0.00008997599,0.00060218706,0.000007572473,0.000057625046,0.0000010352028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022752756,0.000028203394,0.0032527968,0.000010512873,0.000005751256,2.8003873e-8,0.020939,0.000046542555,0.000008217454,0.9654504,0.007556688,0.0026791024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027283945,0.0000097246075,0.0028033883,0.0000070164724,0.000010009009,4.3569972e-7,0.1375039,0.0007589941,0.00002545679,0.0024138694,0.8561494,0.000044948694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050000106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018850105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96303654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031507254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013096396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520056243","doi":"","title":"A Better Bar: Why and How the Existing Bar Exam Should Change","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.23955776567088924,"score_gpt":0.324527853239712,"score_spread":0.08497008756882277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520056243","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1430366,0.00017872205,0.00021673943,0.74192643,0.0002662329,0.00026404273,0.0000095205105,0.000050836443,0.11405085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97865653,0.00012955889,0.0012130286,0.0046599433,0.00034093566,9.928613e-7,0.0000024612307,0.0000048006455,0.014991742],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930274,0.00015381211,0.000045543955,0.00013451712,0.00021970207,0.00014366252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929625,0.00028867385,0.000101954705,0.00012799652,0.000118222786,0.00006690316],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004052098,0.0000559816,0.00007931778,0.00007080045,0.0009996583,0.00009117385,0.00021392325,0.00007478636,0.0018347746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022002676,0.0000569299,0.000032550583,0.00039525525,0.00029006333,0.000843857,0.000055757355,0.00020927346,0.000046050514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019047846,0.00024770378,0.022650477,0.000043619642,0.00008238147,0.000019301498,0.35324776,0.0000012794675,0.00015596599,0.12987119,0.34763956,0.14602174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014439317,0.000016666047,0.0124442745,0.000010101835,0.000020893529,0.0000010818757,0.03842801,0.00016131884,0.0000020586588,0.000319639,0.94837445,0.00007712214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040166634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029453705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8356199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003461915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048227972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521250136","doi":"","title":"Can Good Character Be Made Better? Assessing the Federation of Law Societies’ Proposed Reform of the Good Character Requirement for Law Society Admission","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Law; Political science; Russian federation; Process (computing); Moral character; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.034883224098858405,"score_gpt":0.3473739367756783,"score_spread":0.3124907126768199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521250136","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37468064,0.00010027266,0.00039779226,0.604329,0.00070734724,0.0010715212,0.000009571084,0.000020187903,0.018683676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99005723,0.0001376007,0.0002348641,0.005522053,0.0005854529,0.000035520163,0.000012025913,0.00001502451,0.0034002382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977484,0.00026160764,0.00048729652,0.00013582343,0.0005556697,0.0008112199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820226,0.00012975118,0.0008370577,0.00018962054,0.0005856743,0.00005562714],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032322092,0.00011856185,0.00015045534,0.000016442946,0.0021974824,0.00041025862,0.0003567121,0.00012022547,0.00012648398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000950019,0.000069054644,0.0002173134,0.00020847755,0.0002638847,0.0013464527,0.00003230282,0.0012663789,0.0000019329116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008685447,0.00014417853,0.00031732148,0.000019424493,0.00012184848,1.4541932e-8,0.011985741,4.3140378e-7,0.028300876,0.9551878,0.00096325064,0.002950459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020321873,0.00054114254,0.011250234,0.00024394256,0.00031999033,0.000031836633,0.18752642,0.00018861274,0.038631868,0.38858405,0.37002164,0.00062808435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034918005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033308186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6153766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012181952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004956943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521382258","doi":"","title":"Educational Visit to the Commonwealth Judicial Education Institute, Halifax, Canada (8-28 June, 2008): Some Observations and Suggestions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Political science; Law; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.018341912373118253,"score_gpt":0.3195814762594732,"score_spread":0.3012395638863549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521382258","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064093225,0.00067559734,0.0014822985,0.9191545,0.0041242694,0.00033197296,0.000018945864,0.000023641494,0.010095517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96870303,0.00092671876,0.0003397703,0.013081981,0.0037999721,0.000056477777,0.000054823784,0.000014209494,0.0130229965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758166,0.00035779778,0.00033384748,0.00018060056,0.00057947426,0.0009665896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982151,0.00036922266,0.0002277735,0.00019040247,0.00075297954,0.00024452672],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003113527,0.00011873855,0.00011479547,0.0001448469,0.0033232083,0.00031797908,0.00036358662,0.00006208339,0.00009841066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028170508,0.00010534446,0.000031806623,0.0008277164,0.00013703959,0.001087602,0.000025865716,0.0014958904,0.000024618677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039650045,0.00007539258,0.0019397119,0.0000015327346,0.000019589681,3.2195267e-8,0.0013088417,0.00004071612,0.000005719497,0.87750864,0.11105706,0.008038786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009524974,0.00002245155,0.015957959,0.000012650329,0.00002415929,0.00002625542,0.0050947266,0.00001620313,8.882912e-7,0.15183446,0.82679445,0.00012056432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6886122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9858408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90607256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002084128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.110948615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99797434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522179030","doi":"","title":"Legal Infrastructure and the New Economy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic law; Business; Recession; Market economy; Economics; Economy","score_opus":0.017783015817966475,"score_gpt":0.2728183504704039,"score_spread":0.25503533465243744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522179030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014157628,0.00023782099,0.00027842663,0.08498996,0.00056187826,0.0002618611,0.0000022202203,0.000035968074,0.89947426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8471571,0.00014063186,0.00004449577,0.000748397,0.0005393041,7.725476e-7,0.0000014963157,0.0000056772733,0.1513621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999041,0.00047830763,0.00008281964,0.0000868991,0.00007544028,0.0002355086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882275,0.000673577,0.00009332999,0.00020693002,0.000106094885,0.00009734008],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087716634,0.000079825884,0.00007723577,0.000065525375,0.0016102971,0.00018390895,0.00043874627,0.000037663045,0.0005772084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018020837,0.000043614582,0.00003864807,0.00063953217,0.0007116422,0.0009460432,0.000096119016,0.00033881015,0.00020423043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026505213,0.000013253754,0.00021644463,0.0000013967463,0.00002644867,1.9432485e-7,0.081922986,0.000002545951,0.0000018025445,0.8787433,0.031821333,0.0072238147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033509234,0.0000036694764,0.00157643,0.0000020911295,0.00004173215,0.0000018585636,0.0134779485,0.000013040024,0.0000062983545,0.00638416,0.9780912,0.00006650392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001280584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015962694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94626987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009641656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006659745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526980196","doi":"","title":"Adopting Regulatory Objectives for the Legal Profession","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Regulatory reform; Context (archaeology); Regulatory authority; Political science; Law; Legal profession; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.03949082283057709,"score_gpt":0.364787834994338,"score_spread":0.3252970121637609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526980196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21981853,0.0027845062,0.0023275989,0.20641316,0.014696033,0.0028539826,0.000021833968,0.0005157887,0.5505686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97551006,0.000015155216,0.0022391037,0.002484437,0.002267028,0.00013630089,0.0000044161643,0.00001162738,0.017331898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989289,0.00020902226,0.00016570151,0.00011744727,0.00025188763,0.00032702423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985932,0.00075838005,0.0001320833,0.00019973294,0.00019188861,0.00012467711],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019407977,0.00007319736,0.000071598355,0.000027566972,0.0020980584,0.0002158595,0.00019806127,0.000081333375,0.00047452105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001656793,0.000054237484,0.000052834675,0.00029508577,0.00017398431,0.0018445874,0.000027167316,0.00032560527,0.00013403496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012262453,0.000068730886,0.0023568014,0.000006453631,0.000013339631,5.1595254e-8,0.009249361,0.0000022070744,0.000115093935,0.9654429,0.019085169,0.0036476136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010950944,0.000008815884,0.007918366,0.000013330647,0.000015203188,5.69659e-7,0.02026715,0.000004131315,0.0001578964,0.00066247955,0.9707557,0.00008682334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035828757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017493546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96478045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010361849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048969255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530569893","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001474","title":"Canadian Legal Ethics: Ready for the Twenty-First Century at Last","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal ethics; Political science; Legal education; Legal profession; Legal realism; Law; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Public administration","score_opus":0.07947018377858342,"score_gpt":0.3855986025917223,"score_spread":0.3061284188131389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530569893","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01669417,0.00036756622,0.000085094995,0.65167344,0.0047287564,0.0003113114,0.00004020806,0.000032856464,0.3260666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767944,0.00063447567,0.00017599599,0.011328786,0.0021569808,0.000013241385,0.000011697961,0.000010902703,0.008873498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988808,0.0001521315,0.00019486473,0.00008859231,0.00032868236,0.0003549451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984426,0.0006209789,0.00014073154,0.0001236409,0.0003868387,0.0002852085],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014160939,0.0000671955,0.00006630597,0.000058949823,0.01220309,0.0003209707,0.0002756483,0.000101661426,0.0011100303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005192036,0.00005173493,0.00005901777,0.00020476553,0.00027153565,0.00064335286,0.000013490336,0.0009510108,0.00018301416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010106793,0.000025123507,0.00070530496,0.0000025354148,0.00002742069,0.000013548572,0.045019485,0.000008309333,0.000004563066,0.68917847,0.2645128,0.00049233006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013005974,0.000010398242,0.0012697913,0.0000055940773,0.000013200192,0.00014493386,0.0037448904,0.000004713721,0.000004560111,0.00059510337,0.99400216,0.00007458328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5007394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.954104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96010023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000518216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002590931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530583193","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics and Moral Character","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Legal ethics; Moral character; Action (physics); Embodied cognition; Law; Sociology; Normative ethics; Epistemology; Legal realism; Political science; Psychology; Legal research; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03412451724597068,"score_gpt":0.37859109250384204,"score_spread":0.3444665752578714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530583193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6019393,0.00015732046,0.00029699694,0.3228833,0.001906548,0.00008781352,0.0000010525652,0.000039088376,0.072688565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857904,0.0008932825,0.00014792837,0.001456119,0.0012433105,0.0000019983872,0.0000012413981,0.0000063830253,0.010459342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984998,0.00018494827,0.00012843928,0.000084821455,0.00024146885,0.0008605283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993539,0.00019190552,0.00010075217,0.00006733847,0.00019586677,0.000090276335],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054053892,0.000054237244,0.000056239336,0.00006707043,0.001222225,0.00035461498,0.0001365622,0.0001243828,0.00029478385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014490898,0.000049897695,0.000025377902,0.00018971054,0.00014957487,0.00096337876,0.000010747388,0.010356674,0.000045551173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004518543,0.000021401682,0.0017704689,5.0247894e-7,0.000011663922,4.2797535e-7,0.004588975,3.9317506e-8,0.00031004852,0.98591334,0.00028215518,0.007096485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012835894,0.000027049458,0.002254269,0.0000017546183,0.000010030637,0.00011430733,0.008953017,0.000002715139,0.000015136218,0.17751758,0.81089306,0.00008270228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002302411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032591324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81061095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013152757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010419553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99519044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531778298","doi":"","title":"Curious Judge: Judicial Notice of Facts, Independent Judicial Research, and the Impact of the Internet","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Law; Political science; Adversarial system; Judicial discretion; Legislature; Jury; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05047184387397196,"score_gpt":0.4231476266124623,"score_spread":0.37267578273849034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531778298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95514226,0.0015331148,0.00009734734,0.022258958,0.00069058314,0.00027233726,0.0000031293598,0.000005492787,0.019996768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997334,0.000907474,0.0000054212474,0.000091587826,0.00076825154,0.000003020519,4.3979122e-7,0.0000066115595,0.0008832121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968862,0.00096875115,0.00030587296,0.00007361648,0.0006810707,0.0010844801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833375,0.00062462495,0.0003676445,0.00013546752,0.0004600378,0.00007847339],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011593142,0.00007053462,0.00013747251,0.00010760355,0.0006243448,0.0000842792,0.0004333026,0.00007635616,0.00013256869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024524652,0.000038929647,0.000098558456,0.0006158056,0.0008797801,0.0005004845,0.00007156124,0.0028958372,0.000007273052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016695137,0.00017911376,0.01461173,0.000001958104,0.00013543229,7.419383e-8,0.03132916,0.000003279328,0.00008110228,0.9485534,0.0015617121,0.0033761098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002516772,0.0005765189,0.11869475,0.000057014044,0.00014476659,0.00013090378,0.083432056,0.000025397962,0.00034968587,0.7681827,0.025646364,0.00024309676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039281692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010843488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1803707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005984313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007925118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532119940","doi":"","title":"Great beyond his knowing : Morton Horwitz's influence on legal education and scholarship in England, Canada and Australia.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; New england; Political science; Economic history; Sociology; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.02251340774124961,"score_gpt":0.2930263709727716,"score_spread":0.270512963231522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532119940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9573055,0.000007567793,0.000002732581,0.003874643,0.00051149674,0.00016017808,0.00000627908,0.000013109018,0.038118523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97866994,0.000011221718,0.00018574954,0.00086926896,0.00014037424,0.0000016980748,0.0000061468872,0.0000068365002,0.020108765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897355,0.0001346022,0.00013697392,0.00030149048,0.00020395473,0.0002494207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992943,0.00012855702,0.00008559903,0.00019616318,0.00011954996,0.00017584453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031627412,0.0001230696,0.000121756224,0.00026707686,0.00027031678,0.00020415123,0.00017485436,0.00010807371,0.00045272318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001735862,0.00013763554,0.000013400331,0.00047947696,0.000116726784,0.0013237245,0.000060276296,0.0006449729,0.000032521184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036842117,0.000057074103,0.9647216,0.000013367075,0.00000923488,0.000029687586,0.004445621,2.080017e-7,0.00022019692,0.019976983,0.00016068103,0.010328512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023936019,0.0000093864655,0.594027,0.000020488902,0.000006903591,0.000007469833,0.0009881575,0.0000015911495,0.000034028137,0.000079002515,0.4044813,0.000105368155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39585474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8946803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49882558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001671712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085140415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6081683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532443611","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1222","title":"Counting Outsiders: A Critical Exploration of Outsider Course Enrollment in Canadian Legal Education","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Calgary; University of Victoria; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Diversity (politics); Identity (music); Sociology; Critical theory; Power (physics); Qualitative property; Higher education; Political science; Law; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.05629451319101359,"score_gpt":0.4259443052658645,"score_spread":0.36964979207485094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532443611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006477624,0.00016251164,0.0014053298,0.10710901,0.0020272234,0.00018339923,0.0000034059806,0.000015023068,0.88261646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951631,0.00002509086,0.0017623561,0.0019712255,0.0006331383,0.0000063332805,0.0000055107507,0.000009483662,0.00042378608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827677,0.00018923802,0.00051506347,0.00012237413,0.00045566345,0.00044088243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836135,0.00026267598,0.00021132934,0.00010212984,0.00070737785,0.00035516464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038227257,0.000083991006,0.00011850296,0.00023535568,0.00073716446,0.00035103768,0.00014567925,0.00010525687,0.0005120652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014309126,0.0000916361,0.00004376171,0.00042498187,0.00017004888,0.0028794357,0.0000071781324,0.0005645004,0.000028369801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010111316,0.00021301585,0.005091774,0.000005382156,0.00000800743,0.000008491061,0.010945231,0.000019166459,0.000042894866,0.97844696,0.0014607775,0.003748197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078639603,0.00009759489,0.013114117,0.0002500641,0.00007481021,0.00009418557,0.19455612,0.00009020844,0.00035696648,0.14415327,0.6459177,0.00050853885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94367826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059900683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064483345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533215818","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1208","title":"In the Public Interest': The Responsibilities and Rights of Government Lawyers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Government (linguistics); Legal ethics; Private rights; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Public interest; Professional ethics; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09554534998777726,"score_gpt":0.3537097210419768,"score_spread":0.25816437105419954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533215818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18144734,0.00013649314,0.000010682861,0.27302936,0.000331223,0.00009510698,0.000003083261,0.0000036804736,0.54494303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966402,0.00012107125,0.000104901424,0.0016062855,0.00015018856,0.000003734123,1.7910875e-7,0.000002099756,0.0013713094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985762,0.0006386134,0.00020209623,0.000059068178,0.00039399663,0.0001300068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989048,0.00071230956,0.00014203202,0.00011454959,0.00008542648,0.00004085945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022181885,0.00004381627,0.000059701644,0.000023278104,0.0012339818,0.00017487734,0.00024961506,0.000031283103,0.00027859927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054020056,0.000023690038,0.000026835474,0.00020068725,0.00054240506,0.00069653353,0.000017418875,0.0004212709,0.0000049265664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011780484,0.000050743114,0.00067339896,8.4492046e-7,0.0000066383154,0.0000050811695,0.025766315,2.2388596e-7,0.000011955625,0.96811515,0.0052445573,0.00011328274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016243858,0.00003178583,0.0025843016,0.000009559618,0.0000058441947,0.00014551575,0.035773255,0.0000021983933,0.000041848085,0.1255283,0.8356665,0.00004847953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02334246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3424984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8425869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007235958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021534886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9831612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534108637","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511547348.020","title":"The Teaching of Professionalism: Vignettes for Discussion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.07309927618922991,"score_gpt":0.45375036807861646,"score_spread":0.38065109188938656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534108637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000014879018,0.00014756601,0.00025631866,0.10767762,0.00085883867,0.0003437896,0.000009050797,0.000045513185,0.8906598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00061231037,0.00015104881,0.0015870733,0.00041807746,0.0004978728,0.000050822004,0.000017504903,0.00004213981,0.99662316],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932826,0.0001552806,0.00013043512,0.000080590864,0.0002027738,0.00010264364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990335,0.0005417951,0.00022819871,0.000115784074,0.000061965664,0.000018744138],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005595259,0.00005487702,0.00007334366,0.000049835988,0.000881229,0.000036401445,0.00018006955,0.000111334964,0.001240744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011093849,0.000024335819,0.00004078751,0.00009843797,0.00014996536,0.00007889697,0.000013087671,0.00018937846,0.000016234962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014000301,0.00001900517,0.000013213762,0.0000047303474,0.0000063455377,1.2684436e-8,0.0027242217,1.3346724e-8,0.000002299001,0.27137834,0.7195732,0.0062772282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039168823,0.0000043289547,0.000014256045,0.00004177333,0.0000054272787,8.199476e-8,0.005689691,9.1007075e-7,0.000002823692,0.0012918473,0.9928609,0.000048784168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003698962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014816611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2732877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001784537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005981525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535247808","doi":"","title":"An Annotated Bibliography of Law Review Articles Addressing Feminist Perspectives in 'Law in Literature'","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliography; Annotated bibliography; Perspective (graphical); Feminism; Inclusion (mineral); Law and literature; Sociology; Law; Political science; Library science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04675471430054226,"score_gpt":0.41999453177696416,"score_spread":0.3732398174764219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535247808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6291383,0.14836374,0.00039398848,0.039888922,0.0004131703,0.0006257009,0.00000696374,0.0000647072,0.18110451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94770926,0.05110791,0.00014015117,0.00088794314,0.00011371103,0.0000023087641,0.0000024692686,0.00000650798,0.000029719518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979108,0.00035365994,0.00041944,0.00013196957,0.00027265062,0.00091145537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917406,0.00014381348,0.00023280544,0.00010244344,0.000275683,0.00007120749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075613996,0.00007745685,0.00014640935,0.002277796,0.00028310178,0.00019155277,0.00019946354,0.000063971434,0.00005207544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024119845,0.000073418625,0.000054807548,0.0133241685,0.00028991885,0.0011771824,0.0000060268685,0.001679866,0.000002052581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026109301,0.00024828297,0.004508449,0.000015889873,0.00001246384,0.00000369709,0.017595654,0.0000011976819,0.000269896,0.9753096,0.00012554979,0.001883196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014103582,0.00046901364,0.01695456,0.0030432965,0.000059251404,0.00015006145,0.2773513,0.000011376903,0.0004735309,0.56602865,0.13344723,0.0006013824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065449947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07238429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40928096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002057723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012722126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536860436","doi":"10.1002/9780470713013.ch3","title":"Assessment for Classification of Women Offenders","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08006599439641748,"score_gpt":0.43829332787433967,"score_spread":0.3582273334779222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536860436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008889985,0.000010361424,0.0064460086,0.0070744185,0.00046371896,0.00036697774,0.0000181726,0.00006333439,0.98554814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011322832,0.000015635149,0.006147869,0.00019551671,0.00032695424,0.0001415832,0.00007454588,0.000046816054,0.98172826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993966,0.00005379602,0.00013968533,0.00010144744,0.0001733245,0.00013512485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934965,0.00012718636,0.0002722282,0.00011283279,0.00010504096,0.00003306322],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052897556,0.000052628315,0.00009696616,0.00013950224,0.00007776057,0.00003736075,0.00010106294,0.00013078372,0.004368759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015344669,0.000051412386,0.000028468057,0.00021097095,0.000079930825,0.00007287934,0.000003465974,0.00007587703,0.000013122644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.3321216e-7,0.000039099512,0.000066611756,0.000011480593,0.000009978608,4.1044768e-9,0.0005435324,5.2035965e-8,0.000010608123,0.39198995,0.60622627,0.0011019729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007168598,0.000008015091,0.0008311627,0.000006429367,0.0000072862135,1.0315007e-8,0.0057612313,0.000004477796,0.0000015549738,0.001299211,0.99194914,0.000059800437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011754842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067083184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3906907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027598024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012503075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537348723","doi":"10.22329/celt.v6i0.3736","title":"5. Transcending Boundaries in Legal Education: A Vehicle for Teaching Students to Think Critically","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Curriculum; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Politics; State (computer science); Agile software development; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.017202568324946644,"score_gpt":0.38642919440493895,"score_spread":0.3692266260799923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537348723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77449316,0.00003668488,0.0016148399,0.06253905,0.00062852015,0.00084030745,0.0000015265819,0.00016672077,0.15967922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792555,0.0000038116768,0.0036564784,0.0021266942,0.00024956433,0.00020060445,0.0000081900025,0.000018482939,0.014480686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810606,0.00068504625,0.000264252,0.00028276848,0.00030834615,0.0003535456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841756,0.0010581019,0.000066746055,0.00008629892,0.00020854881,0.00016276832],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019229979,0.00012201893,0.0001543887,0.00030608138,0.0045189797,0.0024491788,0.00018413592,0.00009119026,0.0001246558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010100448,0.00013059335,0.000032766173,0.00031430606,0.0001235217,0.00082890334,0.000021632879,0.0012405673,0.000024269344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048804603,0.000505067,0.014716073,0.0000299748,0.000022792272,8.089921e-7,0.17624302,0.000042894382,0.00042170534,0.74692243,0.009034867,0.05201155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006439247,0.00020466151,0.01235044,0.00022470114,0.000020076668,0.000002256209,0.09502884,0.00042002744,0.00001372806,0.004502129,0.8862566,0.0003326391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008116274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010033093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8772217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019286989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000960573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99858636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537590232","doi":"10.4324/9780203063941","title":"Public Sector Ethics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public sector; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.48324476909776365,"score_gpt":0.46447903864214474,"score_spread":0.018765730455618912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537590232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[3.8444819e-7,0.00010224872,0.00006254891,0.18351804,0.0020536017,0.00010725735,0.0000052308046,0.00010455478,0.81404614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008390617,0.00011156406,0.00033393907,0.0077697826,0.0030560682,0.000010768095,0.000066672255,0.000014967354,0.9877972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988306,0.00019897579,0.0001532672,0.00011528294,0.00047121325,0.00023063767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808884,0.0009024674,0.00014849477,0.00017540799,0.00053308875,0.00015170524],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001847274,0.00008597897,0.00009145593,0.00011748226,0.00064225105,0.00035099973,0.0002280736,0.0006295186,0.05573632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028448682,0.00008287171,0.000047066664,0.00020143334,0.00017882923,0.00075437623,0.000021914791,0.0016930838,0.0036244793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.2355743e-7,0.000010588561,0.000008580693,0.0000034639995,0.0000063122266,5.021742e-8,0.005747611,1.978938e-9,8.756334e-8,0.5501962,0.44328973,0.00073725823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017226628,0.0000021158992,0.000013950797,0.000005130333,0.00001118232,2.5909526e-7,0.0006861093,6.0843455e-8,2.5217886e-7,0.019011576,0.98013765,0.000114479626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015097222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061512305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53684795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003062873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014778241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539176873","doi":"","title":"Meeting the Professional Identity Challenge in Legal Education Through a Relationship-Centered Experiential Curriculum","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Baltimore law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Legal education; Experiential learning; Curriculum; Identity (music); Normative; Experiential education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Legal profession; Engineering ethics; Civility; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.087556430134911,"score_gpt":0.3748586248068578,"score_spread":0.2873021946719468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539176873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042013254,0.010315549,0.00027286605,0.059978902,0.0019567918,0.001448026,0.000008122055,0.000058761365,0.88394773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99196374,0.0043140287,0.001550379,0.0008777346,0.00007059483,0.00000397677,0.000016262122,0.0000038325243,0.0011994437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879754,0.00049944804,0.00019951373,0.00013610505,0.00024388463,0.00012351458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992167,0.000082320585,0.00025688394,0.00016483871,0.00024275591,0.000036536396],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081500626,0.000060815182,0.00012072529,0.000033709588,0.0006444547,0.000020146912,0.00030797825,0.000052298274,0.0014188384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003527546,0.00005584789,0.0000649906,0.000538189,0.00026009962,0.001800566,0.0000529374,0.00024408045,0.000040773226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004139357,0.00044070548,0.002734984,0.00011928333,0.000005616947,8.015665e-7,0.03443336,1.044647e-7,7.209171e-7,0.957576,0.0040786876,0.0006056228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014135784,0.000010406475,0.0047546197,0.0011839328,0.000038354538,0.000001052276,0.041869108,0.0000028329061,0.000001982404,0.0029131684,0.94898885,0.00009434823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056925006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02307961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9546628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008929069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006793123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539327783","doi":"","title":"TIME FOR CHANGE: UNETHICAL HOURLY BILLING IN THE CANADIAN PROFESSION AND WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT IT","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Temptation; Dishonesty; Inefficiency; Work (physics); Business; Language change; Political science; Public relations; Law; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09421003923449742,"score_gpt":0.41636925998776697,"score_spread":0.3221592207532695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539327783","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06998703,0.0015365697,0.00015644322,0.92699873,0.0003060738,0.00037136237,0.0000024029264,0.000007927491,0.00063344504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979704,0.0043686046,0.000088713336,0.014299681,0.0006680162,0.00003510207,0.0000058474598,0.000007837055,0.0008221662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982714,0.00019541493,0.00016155123,0.00010184787,0.00025538,0.0010144133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941665,0.00019838098,0.00008981045,0.00006302542,0.00013298928,0.00009912293],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005686186,0.00006496761,0.00007247102,0.00013602729,0.0014938281,0.00047994094,0.00018414289,0.00013951777,0.000032842596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046551393,0.000046934423,0.000026459846,0.00042050285,0.00011450056,0.0013257745,0.0000054412108,0.002340293,0.0000071506483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021730215,0.0000605176,0.00017785016,0.0000037847165,0.000018183928,0.00000156885,0.092238106,0.000009563239,0.00002674192,0.8814242,0.0009965758,0.02502119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008135119,0.00017089621,0.0010582459,0.0001257359,0.00002862168,0.00006291254,0.23846368,0.000037574115,0.000008531939,0.22086596,0.5381594,0.00020495632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21289597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9520183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91269904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001110501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01375629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542569290","doi":"10.1177/1037969x1303800203","title":"REDISCOVERING LAW STUDENTS AS CITIZENS Critical thinking and the public value of legal education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Value (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Feeling; Legal profession; Sociology; Work (physics); Public administration; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.010581178017419684,"score_gpt":0.3157180920256678,"score_spread":0.3051369140082481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542569290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75796056,0.000032111493,0.00014177256,0.1462964,0.00017455114,0.00020258878,0.0000016728036,0.00004432399,0.095146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99713546,0.000076713884,0.0013465746,0.00023143388,0.00002296925,0.000001247895,0.0000012450993,0.0000028457737,0.0011815019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927634,0.00010183183,0.00012282327,0.00013455663,0.00023186638,0.00013256504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912363,0.00019855374,0.00012096394,0.0001876807,0.00032698183,0.0000422004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051222445,0.000054800086,0.000118021984,0.00015538505,0.0006022443,0.00008757327,0.0004186331,0.00011696863,0.000273152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094754866,0.000050325107,0.000030369883,0.0003687197,0.0015783298,0.00062793493,0.0001667166,0.00025701907,0.000024259514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008759708,0.00007545626,0.011999894,0.00000743529,0.000020413909,5.1675e-7,0.0033668387,1.9806843e-7,0.00004999435,0.9822479,0.0005334226,0.0016891656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012267353,0.00005271347,0.047829624,0.00010364384,0.00009143702,0.000012646109,0.1361445,0.000024641718,0.0003307017,0.46232828,0.35162666,0.00022839142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022725567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093866506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51991963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004289462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004141853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9837822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543191960","doi":"","title":"Law Stretched Thin: Access to Justice in Rural America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rural area; Economic Justice; Practice of law; Poverty; Political science; Population; Legal education; Economic growth; Law; Legal profession; Sociology","score_opus":0.025201652322548417,"score_gpt":0.3862328077802175,"score_spread":0.3610311554576691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543191960","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21787919,0.00020620722,0.008197395,0.46241638,0.0019549446,0.00033412856,0.0000015403413,0.00008502074,0.30892518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99028236,0.00030578088,0.00017142811,0.0068227896,0.0007717267,0.0000070981228,0.0000016106638,0.000008114616,0.0016290788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978542,0.00032463786,0.00021686393,0.00010328449,0.00029446336,0.0012065733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992731,0.0002163506,0.00013178942,0.00010249427,0.00015665474,0.000119564356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024991282,0.00007358814,0.000099935394,0.00012151345,0.0005605934,0.00044489,0.00044808618,0.000052178435,0.0002478399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011323392,0.000070747745,0.000032790304,0.00082439964,0.000071728624,0.0011619986,0.000026245223,0.0018115446,0.00012735424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001557248,0.00005013952,0.00065649644,0.0000012554267,0.000010627735,2.7166e-7,0.006376245,0.000056094774,0.000022379078,0.9721274,0.0012000086,0.019483522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000329845,0.00011220248,0.00140644,0.000015100458,0.000029782515,0.000014047206,0.06121554,0.00008210398,0.000013537979,0.26572084,0.67086184,0.00019868734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013021406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067129746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7724032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007668507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039008271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99355096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544282991","doi":"10.53300/001c.5608","title":"Dr John Kearney QC AM and the role of philanthropy in legal education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Generosity; Legal education; Political science; Law; Sociology; Management; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02070498761656456,"score_gpt":0.3705289617718886,"score_spread":0.349823974155324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544282991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013245756,0.041269273,0.0000047516446,0.16286089,0.0002256738,0.00040960597,0.0000011890131,0.000010790403,0.7938933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509517,0.03535457,0.00018210003,0.011345742,0.00022421179,0.00006270814,0.0000068977097,0.0000053892018,0.0018667043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991693,0.00032949794,0.00020968232,0.00008226703,0.00012924966,0.00007999249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993758,0.00022642442,0.00013899256,0.00013307712,0.00009509262,0.000030586514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017013183,0.000042838703,0.00013398404,0.000020253,0.00016682791,0.000054762022,0.000101648315,0.000026383197,0.00023580059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009270799,0.000029854069,0.000025734751,0.00032286366,0.00028672672,0.0002831751,0.000011687047,0.00012621468,0.000024844545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019345596,0.000037220932,0.00014526874,0.000068312766,0.000001814826,1.2167358e-8,0.0010129521,2.6527522e-8,0.0000040275827,0.96607614,0.0055990946,0.027053203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008483776,0.000004598556,0.00035055212,0.0002632739,0.000015015867,7.716183e-7,0.00060346763,0.00000237058,0.000009515531,0.008385642,0.99024206,0.00003789105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02197593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004777552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016599937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003778131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9845368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544385193","doi":"","title":"Teaching Sexual Assault: The Education of Canadian Law Students","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Political science; Sexual violence; Obligation; Curriculum; Sociology; Criminology; Criminal law; Politics; Criminal justice; Psychology","score_opus":0.016948275801160227,"score_gpt":0.37647646333254775,"score_spread":0.35952818753138754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544385193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61419374,0.00009701516,0.00003432141,0.09468747,0.0018047241,0.00014398506,0.0000015216066,0.000011475318,0.28902578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98545307,0.00006636541,0.000060965962,0.0010612158,0.0007937353,0.0000040767923,0.000002115649,0.0000055338196,0.012552935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844784,0.00022109071,0.00016546687,0.00006735504,0.00038015403,0.0007180764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992723,0.00010009854,0.00015662613,0.00011188683,0.00025498256,0.000104130304],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057560843,0.000048397327,0.000049820635,0.000171003,0.0014793164,0.00020017606,0.0004360701,0.00006752421,0.00014209503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006034578,0.00003766711,0.000023629142,0.0003811023,0.00011121278,0.0004764443,0.0000084864605,0.0040376317,0.000021995973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013513256,0.000060151004,0.0025924407,4.3772644e-7,0.000019895044,4.4867512e-8,0.009694671,3.2167762e-7,0.00016479076,0.97553426,0.0013475303,0.010584133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006620661,0.00002448719,0.0017856034,0.0000023910711,0.000015266536,0.000021358921,0.075364925,8.065348e-7,0.000009378588,0.07997906,0.8426745,0.000056031226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86517304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9829867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8955552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041067763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030939933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544813641","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500001190","title":"Bringing Legal Education to the Canadian Arctic: the Development of the Akitsiraq Law School and the Challenges for Providing Library Services to a Non-traditional Law School","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"The arctic; Arctic; Economic Justice; Legal education; Law; Political science; Sociology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.02447517598327833,"score_gpt":0.3059408628362984,"score_spread":0.2814656868530201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544813641","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0522346,0.00015539424,0.0006722403,0.81251466,0.0026239972,0.0011863497,0.000032296663,0.000012395236,0.13056804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983672,0.0000090789035,0.0017401677,0.012950593,0.0011467319,0.00007191118,0.000014566155,0.000005687783,0.00038923175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983871,0.00010893656,0.00060932094,0.000064141364,0.00067820156,0.00015232945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773306,0.0003402856,0.0005354405,0.000106229396,0.00116938,0.00011558328],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016658944,0.00008797032,0.000086928136,0.0001728999,0.0013333868,0.0015090457,0.00072696444,0.000043603315,0.00004894938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004756524,0.00004797822,0.000065626824,0.00027122378,0.00012997378,0.005145899,0.000053493935,0.0003090277,0.000013450315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006187941,0.000025232945,0.00016643993,0.00001435175,0.00004463573,7.430205e-8,0.017817877,0.00036498797,0.0000114572695,0.97395116,0.003972456,0.0035694332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002956267,0.00001530963,0.014436346,0.00014513456,0.000017949531,0.000021233194,0.010074103,0.00013764594,0.00016963927,0.005091614,0.9695192,0.00007618822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10429445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32076305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96885955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035823384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003927424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545203131","doi":"","title":"Judges and Their Editors","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Craft; Law; Pride; Political science; Judicial opinion; Economic Justice; Sociology; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.05403533965330897,"score_gpt":0.39658424178053403,"score_spread":0.34254890212722505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545203131","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05917193,0.0000066969833,0.0001751209,0.5911052,0.0018305889,0.00015677024,0.000054048454,0.00019500751,0.3473046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97285485,0.000009909814,0.0021509947,0.0012738288,0.003132324,0.0000903594,0.00017917293,0.0000069629486,0.020301573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950296,0.000037351463,0.000100012774,0.00012129703,0.000108715874,0.00012968932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991085,0.00017365295,0.00005967389,0.00016921344,0.00037033347,0.00011861806],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040796344,0.000048485384,0.000041853622,0.00008837116,0.000888372,0.00042828041,0.00016335103,0.0000744262,0.0012950451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021630775,0.000041331412,0.000016979158,0.0005812189,0.00020774687,0.0009975801,0.00001957699,0.00029647138,0.00009564611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.1089905e-7,0.000043394666,0.0057573155,5.546628e-7,0.000004596002,6.919132e-9,0.008821904,5.8203035e-8,0.0002504191,0.5665837,0.4148885,0.0036493659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035472392,0.0000019842223,0.026946852,3.7220883e-7,0.0000024086532,5.8934694e-7,0.0049664327,0.000006555114,0.000032758606,0.0022117964,0.96573997,0.00005479858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097334315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026764711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91368294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016056656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004438828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545767087","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1640533","title":"Comparing and Understanding Legal Aid Priorities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06590970118146412,"score_gpt":0.3586344765920743,"score_spread":0.2927247754106102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545767087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3853927,0.0025785915,0.015780946,0.2221903,0.0009035905,0.00017763722,4.7132727e-7,0.0001117854,0.37286398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940807,0.0016207143,0.00010044904,0.0004535768,0.00041314913,4.2702396e-7,4.0993578e-7,0.0000032548016,0.0033273196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986804,0.000091249254,0.00013184079,0.000073533905,0.00019106008,0.00083190773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996882,0.000067619636,0.00008468648,0.000040932704,0.000055351287,0.00006322555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017217484,0.000052333304,0.000070801325,0.00008777867,0.0011260415,0.0004380645,0.000095803676,0.000035559708,0.000034675406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001929389,0.000052348336,0.00002188589,0.0002182507,0.000074385665,0.0010020054,0.0000054662414,0.0013490152,0.000006055323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067824185,0.000013180507,0.0016579006,4.459869e-7,0.000010896417,4.3563054e-7,0.0030814281,0.0000013286322,0.000015771015,0.9923411,0.0002246908,0.002646039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002603284,0.00007734643,0.001340822,0.000010022906,0.000013855832,0.000087990215,0.088866875,0.000016265913,0.000004193895,0.7868941,0.12232236,0.000105845684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000779001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058034635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.608688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010686718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039925184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8660715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546336473","doi":"","title":"Beyond Provincialism: Canadian Law Societies and the Protection of Human Rights Abroad","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Human rights; Political science; Law; International human rights law; Promotion (chess); Rule of law; International law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.044824019201623905,"score_gpt":0.2819046835104659,"score_spread":0.23708066430884198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546336473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7176181,0.000036154233,0.0000048869074,0.00705633,0.00014285147,0.0003884507,0.000015917696,0.000020957441,0.27471632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99262816,0.0000060459615,0.00021156462,0.00022009811,0.0000569105,0.0000013031764,0.000005692406,0.0000053211643,0.0068648895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987691,0.00039931966,0.00014496352,0.00017321426,0.00030205474,0.00021135507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897736,0.0000746958,0.00025331456,0.0001983518,0.00035166903,0.0001445959],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015058274,0.000087257875,0.00015393527,0.0001488965,0.0032445116,0.000049155013,0.000341991,0.00017104454,0.00086854433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012187297,0.0000848491,0.00007815841,0.0004310048,0.0017351293,0.0012042635,0.000052773707,0.00037883513,0.000019554845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008926344,0.000054073447,0.0050171223,0.000020299389,0.000047749487,0.0000015198028,0.12622547,1.1969954e-7,0.00029352435,0.8671804,0.00093546626,0.00013497783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035144952,0.00023131065,0.216753,0.000094968455,0.00032052372,0.000007934425,0.0904421,0.0000057786547,0.002897726,0.26205975,0.423024,0.00064840575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7302856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82054275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60512066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014551845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005024156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99805313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546627872","doi":"","title":"Problématiques juridiques des logiciels libres et ouverts : défis et solutions pour le gouvernement du Québec (RESOLL)","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.08213550339714303,"score_gpt":0.3865021566930917,"score_spread":0.30436665329594864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546627872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08731772,0.00054616504,0.00009493832,0.3352012,0.0005924665,0.0011425583,0.0000769559,0.0001227768,0.5749052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84941125,0.060508896,0.013007372,0.0032816958,0.0008457056,0.0008988906,0.000089742825,0.00008668289,0.071869776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927122,0.0033918403,0.0011690415,0.0009800553,0.0005182939,0.0012285576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455005,0.003081775,0.00056247675,0.00076702196,0.00068352104,0.00035518056],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008999316,0.000443765,0.00054760475,0.00049541396,0.0015912935,0.0009584401,0.0011277532,0.0005852692,0.0011605605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00427222,0.0004957108,0.00025785743,0.0005201767,0.0018510275,0.0016686784,0.0009857677,0.0027384425,0.0002060372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008219029,0.0028215253,0.0066490453,0.00020735266,0.00028843075,0.000014205804,0.087632336,0.014701909,0.00014582429,0.6103854,0.03626158,0.24081019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031132752,0.00009407759,0.01157139,0.00027353808,0.000018949439,0.000006547344,0.014786582,0.0015120148,0.0001156278,0.022621559,0.94815886,0.0005295003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26838732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6022159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9118973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005698188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034897942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W154861593","doi":"","title":"Legal Aid in Ontario: A Comparative Perspective for U.S. Consideration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1287581957756812,"score_gpt":0.4607099017146684,"score_spread":0.3319517059389872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W154861593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08067812,0.0000071686127,0.004559681,0.02779598,0.00033909737,0.00041969388,0.0000010118415,0.000027935648,0.88617134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745196,5.558062e-7,0.0049463683,0.0013530918,0.00008745551,0.000022163711,0.0000048161537,0.0000019669876,0.019063978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994267,0.000046529065,0.00014997908,0.000109944616,0.000115250456,0.00015159599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894905,0.0005220891,0.000052988147,0.0000455159,0.00038955704,0.000040780025],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096180337,0.0000422719,0.00006743852,0.000097845324,0.00030433823,0.00013086719,0.000043247463,0.00004300482,0.0010888648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047603925,0.000042833042,0.000020152544,0.00026693306,0.00008210961,0.00074482977,0.0000036967654,0.00017206528,0.000029435942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026049316,0.00006403369,0.0029259077,2.8175495e-7,0.0000039872357,3.576803e-7,0.10542198,0.0000026486196,0.000024637358,0.88580734,0.0056511993,0.00007158568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003155536,0.00002581977,0.016565371,0.0000021805722,0.0000033077506,5.539021e-7,0.20964415,0.000010755193,0.00016589843,0.0139313135,0.7592588,0.00007628133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7530595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8938415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068399205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017698419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550906034","doi":"","title":"Litigating Family Law Economically: The Case Study of My Support Calculator, and Lessons for the Civil Litigation Bar","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Calculator; Bridge (graph theory); Public support; Civil procedure; Child support; Representation (politics); Law; Family law; Political science; Legal service; Business; Public administration; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05120476624619458,"score_gpt":0.3773690736467108,"score_spread":0.3261643074005162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550906034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94991726,0.00047164218,0.00041843508,0.045375004,0.000311716,0.00040262885,0.0000033145204,0.000008935476,0.0030910464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982392,0.00017694589,0.000035090303,0.0006323883,0.0005587045,0.00002929136,0.0000010703687,0.000007983098,0.00031933445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851847,0.0002639564,0.00027395395,0.00008133546,0.0001337614,0.0007285154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854445,0.00084822497,0.00025212567,0.000113267466,0.00017158574,0.000070359],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006136079,0.00006616994,0.00008659942,0.000026872722,0.0018337638,0.00016449546,0.0001516743,0.00004183383,0.00003760927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037775913,0.000042950927,0.000043478674,0.00013939795,0.00017814741,0.0006444915,0.000017778446,0.0008558601,0.0000027479198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050510102,0.00009838209,0.0017027289,0.0000016419885,0.0000733083,3.549126e-7,0.036818653,0.0000045637225,0.000021477235,0.9560096,0.00019310742,0.005071079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054059265,0.00019751047,0.0023766067,0.000005350837,0.00014699902,0.0003549692,0.85557914,0.00007267663,0.000017158198,0.055757392,0.08483076,0.000120862125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011964776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049012676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9002523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023802827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002357157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550950790","doi":"","title":"Bridging the Gap Between Indian and North American Legal Education in the Boom of Legal Process Outsourcing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Outsourcing; Legal profession; Legal culture; International Legal English Certificate; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Legal history; Business; Comparative law; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.024776354580268445,"score_gpt":0.3460326656554789,"score_spread":0.32125631107521047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550950790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94756866,0.00022805319,0.00016451081,0.048679054,0.00008564874,0.00013507428,0.0000011948923,0.0000064672845,0.003131324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976948,0.00057770143,0.00001717705,0.00056184543,0.00067016133,0.000006710831,0.0000026234356,0.000006146954,0.0004628597],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833566,0.00033125724,0.0002454501,0.000095794174,0.0003334276,0.0006584228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992235,0.00018270242,0.00032230848,0.00009135575,0.00013798945,0.00004219329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023743333,0.00006959585,0.00010039689,0.00010688525,0.0010459401,0.00015174964,0.00029852137,0.000021697371,0.0000055643995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041089414,0.0000471744,0.000029277759,0.000932918,0.00030647163,0.0007145359,0.000009159779,0.001779499,0.0000016602471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012785715,0.00012239572,0.70413375,0.0000054388247,0.000042434727,0.0000014764523,0.11121195,0.000025561865,0.0000063013154,0.10589784,0.00040461394,0.07813543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000265244,0.00013590169,0.58171844,0.000023052695,0.000044483873,0.000365297,0.36749062,0.000012087095,0.000015016553,0.00777762,0.041950256,0.000201996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019578036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057439312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25627866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025505168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015174287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552028553","doi":"","title":"The Tree of Knowledge/The Axe of Power: Gerald Le Dain and the Transformation of Canadian Legal Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Autonomy; Power (physics); De facto; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.01904521537381921,"score_gpt":0.3061441499769534,"score_spread":0.2870989346031342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552028553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17599735,0.001971063,0.000024712286,0.15438233,0.00092386105,0.000530053,0.000014723556,0.000009021422,0.6661469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966876,0.00013545789,0.00005978592,0.00050383044,0.00013862907,0.00002526145,0.0000045772435,0.0000041930452,0.0024407008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989214,0.0003910441,0.00029282732,0.00005334872,0.00017707593,0.00016428543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987031,0.00052275823,0.00020318864,0.00019150038,0.0002848014,0.00009462136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023638993,0.000054859393,0.00009384742,0.00007754802,0.000756467,0.00007233658,0.00022750975,0.00004957055,0.00010218626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006147836,0.00003234067,0.00004330856,0.0006382816,0.0006240263,0.00088750885,0.000008104756,0.00018111726,0.000009620289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012164857,0.00005196804,0.00038705373,0.000006684839,0.000013111554,3.7866283e-9,0.03609896,6.929484e-7,0.00007404623,0.95333266,0.0057821353,0.004240487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020489842,0.000010449462,0.0059677865,0.000011439844,0.00002071989,7.3612324e-7,0.02695436,0.0000051079232,0.0005288313,0.0024914227,0.9637596,0.000044629865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54846656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6834684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9579775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004597722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002146177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5818209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W155222966","doi":"","title":"The legal status of clinical and ethics policies, codes, and guidelines in medical practice and research.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Jurisprudence; Political science; Legislature; Professional conduct; Law; Ethical code; Legal profession; Practice of law; Legal research; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Medical law; Medicine","score_opus":0.41578300123739326,"score_gpt":0.6014557864024014,"score_spread":0.18567278516500813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W155222966","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16097488,0.0022398424,0.000005973551,0.7652863,0.00025501163,0.00032798134,0.0000034029576,0.0000101844935,0.0708964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92474365,0.06707411,0.0003529425,0.005107626,0.00038184103,0.00009371267,0.0000013046632,0.0000046850464,0.002240109],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966355,0.00171005,0.00044776645,0.00013737135,0.0007129914,0.0003563095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98481023,0.013951841,0.00012410305,0.00010249335,0.0007379687,0.00027335787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031033626,0.000039862785,0.000099811354,0.000069687245,0.00051234924,0.0002282506,0.00010418282,0.00015705859,0.000011892217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24476966,0.000029346309,0.000008060632,0.0005456312,0.00168805,0.00047982208,0.0000725921,0.0010399364,5.6025584e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008268018,0.00007530592,0.06793599,0.000006331068,0.000013306795,0.0000046769774,0.010243617,9.080046e-8,2.6795195e-7,0.43382755,0.014458864,0.47335133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018156727,0.0000080590125,0.1666568,0.00000522979,0.0000038268213,0.0000064420865,0.01055465,0.000012497649,3.183511e-7,0.0014810644,0.82106125,0.000028290338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09544926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056693733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80660236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021561937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015344825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552784665","doi":"","title":"Experimenting with Problem-Based Learning in Constitutional Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05430242520721475,"score_gpt":0.3153112781414687,"score_spread":0.26100885293425397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552784665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23635933,0.00003901451,0.00020254785,0.0034757454,0.00030064306,0.0004606509,0.000005232575,0.00006517651,0.7590917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890221,0.000007875504,0.0030913719,0.0003844642,0.00007924184,0.000010175159,0.000025840895,0.000006537176,0.0073724044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976908,0.00063125347,0.00029257216,0.00041204866,0.0006298844,0.00034344674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988824,0.00027841984,0.00021478823,0.00016928032,0.00030897258,0.00014611482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001478686,0.00015183448,0.00017274762,0.0003664543,0.0029441104,0.0010217684,0.0006888935,0.00015555722,0.0007053129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043587707,0.00017709962,0.000039096685,0.0014977036,0.0012534903,0.005500443,0.000114884286,0.0011333809,0.00005256379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083602914,0.0004025171,0.09324188,0.000008339281,0.000012619439,0.00013157199,0.0037781207,0.005378538,0.00017321802,0.8965128,0.0001310241,0.0001457509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016901509,0.000049128023,0.005751421,0.00028412114,0.000013832599,0.000016941964,0.0068683224,0.00019024355,0.00019848008,0.00036108278,0.9842128,0.0003634522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0096085435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057519376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013005191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002226497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552970822","doi":"","title":"Law Students, Law Schools and Their Graduates","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Windsor; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Legal profession; Law; Legal research; Legal psychology; Political science; Population; Empirical legal studies; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.024926394983094017,"score_gpt":0.36098591037107336,"score_spread":0.33605951538797935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552970822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5111548,0.003802597,0.0010704962,0.23379092,0.00085936795,0.0002975434,0.0000023160171,0.0001084497,0.24891351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863531,0.006176718,0.000043974094,0.001967216,0.00048253863,0.0000040887194,0.000001453731,0.000007751513,0.004963188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983265,0.00018264561,0.00016209422,0.00010530693,0.00024934608,0.0009740994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947095,0.00009878204,0.00010537206,0.000078416386,0.00014577399,0.00010067906],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002487451,0.00007683374,0.000081167775,0.000046721387,0.0013307875,0.0005840645,0.00023982597,0.000049101996,0.000105330284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015767325,0.00006293049,0.000033223005,0.00028961775,0.00013968737,0.0009549279,0.000019188306,0.0017685818,0.00005071969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069074276,0.00005401675,0.0033703565,3.927889e-7,0.00003887181,5.6350467e-7,0.0023564484,3.0892323e-7,0.000029291503,0.9895149,0.00032874156,0.0042992183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016273813,0.00003641433,0.000250673,0.000004602879,0.000007876359,0.00006652498,0.026240084,5.5286495e-7,0.00001107169,0.45016137,0.52298856,0.000069576665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007463908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050172817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53935355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036019238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020223688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553285045","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Legal Resources : Primary Sources - Aboriginal Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03344717642747205,"score_gpt":0.3667033863780319,"score_spread":0.3332562099505598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553285045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003799394,0.0025441325,0.00002005417,0.06705125,0.0053567314,0.00031956125,0.00006254906,0.00044072213,0.9238251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006329601,0.001368732,0.0025135644,0.02381909,0.018266005,0.000080459686,0.00040379367,0.00008438519,0.9471344],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966949,0.00049286435,0.0006414097,0.00043774061,0.0009602672,0.00077281025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731207,0.0008545931,0.00053387386,0.0004718531,0.00048732499,0.0003402874],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019201951,0.0003526107,0.0004124774,0.00028075455,0.0017215061,0.0017801635,0.0008847414,0.00064760627,0.013879399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044988378,0.00032574977,0.00017735183,0.00082767155,0.00085080514,0.0029800264,0.00006473196,0.0014075239,0.0012618575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005743713,0.00007573638,0.00010174454,0.00003312444,0.00003719274,0.0000013365162,0.009888904,2.1762824e-7,0.00000188644,0.41344893,0.57525724,0.0011479247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093122966,0.000017643837,0.00013163136,0.000056024124,0.00009176053,0.0000043724317,0.006448404,2.1211208e-7,0.000007697522,0.0010039512,0.99170053,0.00044467323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1488347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016489426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41644323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003260022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003941206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553425131","doi":"10.1002/9781118785317.weom020104","title":"Canada, Business Ethics In","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley Encyclopedia of Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; State (computer science); Political science; Philosophy of business; Information ethics; Economy; Sociology; Law; Management; Economics; Business model; Computer science","score_opus":0.038137123786030964,"score_gpt":0.3380141453582753,"score_spread":0.29987702157224433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553425131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000034874708,0.00037787593,0.000012330329,0.019958414,0.0018080199,0.00034218948,0.00003724456,0.000030786283,0.9774296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00019985808,0.0078009805,0.00059621985,0.0010036958,0.0003938371,0.000033752804,0.00006274741,0.000065183456,0.9898437],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985267,0.0001719196,0.00024220588,0.0001719983,0.00069973187,0.00018744076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916583,0.0001005837,0.0002484983,0.00022932122,0.00018882324,0.000066947636],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095351477,0.000110846224,0.00016586519,0.00028053919,0.00005475285,0.000023382678,0.00030418386,0.00017963807,0.002734933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065040105,0.00012066008,0.000012577838,0.0010177563,0.0000869456,0.00008832654,0.00005218211,0.00039855507,0.000045853056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015650181,0.000047522415,0.00012836902,0.00009495592,0.000018729339,0.0000071146806,0.0020157692,0.000003694184,7.144362e-9,0.029035684,0.9654852,0.0031613968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104805906,0.000001981325,0.0007070655,0.00018004706,0.00001946588,5.539769e-8,0.002471357,2.7451452e-7,2.0681442e-8,0.00028791014,0.9960978,0.00012920803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9735008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99351966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030612616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002697955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006914681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554530639","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4561","title":"Gender and Professionalism in Law: The Challenge of (Women’s) Biography","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Legal history; Law; Biography; Political science; Legal realism; Legal education; Gender studies; Legal writing; Legal practice; Sociology; Legal research","score_opus":0.11194327707706998,"score_gpt":0.4279801340191505,"score_spread":0.31603685694208056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554530639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54420894,0.00057755824,0.000028329217,0.1074668,0.00043413526,0.00065809005,0.0000086535465,0.000024336658,0.34659314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996649,0.00008275028,0.00014451194,0.0028429434,0.000097017444,0.000018944786,7.0600447e-7,0.0000033337246,0.00016077234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913985,0.00012497937,0.00020381961,0.000114208866,0.00024772497,0.00016943245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927765,0.00025410054,0.00012306827,0.00013885577,0.00015081617,0.000055523033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009007272,0.000053922686,0.00010290656,0.00015482253,0.00014055698,0.000053623604,0.00028063645,0.0000538831,0.00020207171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036146733,0.000041767493,0.00001904412,0.00064780196,0.00019320482,0.0004969123,0.00003482037,0.0001584983,0.00000411609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034978777,0.00020833065,0.0012524744,0.000045043613,0.000011873285,5.306866e-7,0.090071194,0.0000067383803,0.0001575904,0.90476125,0.0010951327,0.0023548608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075898273,0.00018711685,0.40258735,0.00017276299,0.00011387041,7.6144227e-7,0.08152131,0.000014644924,0.000398156,0.07026816,0.4436139,0.0003630015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015125109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022284614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8344931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021499667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22864743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555210384","doi":"","title":"A Reply to Anderson's \"Clarifying What Values?\"","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06115517348594954,"score_gpt":0.3755677960656849,"score_spread":0.31441262257973535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555210384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.486683,0.07297912,0.06544134,0.35081336,0.012344729,0.00033095345,0.0000045327956,0.000025622025,0.01137733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8178771,0.11747214,0.0015641088,0.057710137,0.0027938192,0.0000029393168,8.3983485e-7,0.00002222467,0.002556651],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992158,0.00011177199,0.00018003209,0.00006194838,0.00016369556,0.00026676187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986452,0.00013251133,0.00013361992,0.00007583499,0.00025240722,0.0007604552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018118765,0.000059214428,0.00009094101,0.00022128041,0.00053698174,0.00056000793,0.00010602248,0.00005447563,0.00042344743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016169208,0.000057707588,0.00003176313,0.0003434547,0.00006969356,0.0013126183,3.3236823e-8,0.00025340402,0.000013339606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048922826,0.000040867835,0.0047252565,0.000006903705,0.0000695412,0.000004663101,0.7464296,0.000015478488,0.000057077817,0.042612102,0.10699753,0.09899206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011955568,0.000029689247,0.00019883765,0.000049754803,0.000007103803,0.000016335583,0.006525783,0.0000013179641,0.000008465976,0.012436596,0.98053086,0.000075712574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046788245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007618641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8735333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027354634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065030594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7073014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557741963","doi":"","title":"\"A Wild Feminist at Her Raving Best\": Reflections on Studying Gender Bias in the Legal Profession","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Resources for feminist research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Social science; Art","score_opus":0.43754197932007644,"score_gpt":0.5525905300425932,"score_spread":0.11504855072251674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557741963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42896888,0.000052635656,0.0000014657761,0.025456484,0.00015066889,0.0007998059,0.000008264106,0.00003114668,0.54453063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90672237,0.000048551745,0.00011360573,0.0012495222,0.000634175,0.0004121032,0.000010285932,0.000021827444,0.09078758],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956352,0.0015954125,0.00036130782,0.0003929981,0.0013026134,0.00071244227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956446,0.003539571,0.00008960126,0.0003993341,0.00020758854,0.00011929693],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008923747,0.00013022576,0.00014003836,0.0003242469,0.0058083623,0.000790592,0.0006328799,0.00015966308,0.0011945576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00209972,0.00009950928,0.000076600336,0.0020222217,0.00049163046,0.0002546927,0.000061895465,0.0011869835,0.00031885083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000759778,0.0018620723,0.01814777,0.00007214458,0.00004769063,0.00001987278,0.74346256,0.00004777386,0.00031218218,0.11059301,0.09926396,0.0254112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002312856,0.00013667063,0.0017140621,0.000049775383,0.0000060279513,0.000004352453,0.1466229,0.000012659769,0.000026671385,0.00040674815,0.8506822,0.000106631094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047825314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005051903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75141823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046640454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006433237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565934189","doi":"","title":"Getting Real: Enhancing the Acquisition of Negotiation Skills Through a Simulated Email Transaction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Redress; Class (philosophy); Database transaction; Psychology; Identity (music); Social psychology; Computer science; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02281973333931978,"score_gpt":0.33151121967735836,"score_spread":0.30869148633803856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565934189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8697093,0.0006012955,0.06700313,0.017315906,0.0010362208,0.00038112866,0.0000016805714,0.00008923117,0.04386207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99662054,0.0020508803,0.00022841684,0.0002323683,0.0003024359,0.00000246873,0.0000027421713,0.000009316873,0.00055083056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982022,0.00036168375,0.00035840744,0.0000958107,0.0002953268,0.00068654463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889904,0.00020457162,0.00043780028,0.00009661574,0.00033302332,0.000028932465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033679807,0.00007043603,0.00008667623,0.00006738842,0.00088344474,0.00006646127,0.00015995296,0.00007901471,0.0002782554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031256958,0.000056585566,0.000067514084,0.0005440019,0.00007487225,0.0012580715,0.0000039849847,0.0011182369,0.000014288719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053052307,0.00021704262,0.0005959626,0.0000053486165,0.00011693654,2.859065e-7,0.1699894,0.00017188433,0.0023717128,0.7965238,0.000071913826,0.029882677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011368666,0.00042266864,0.009965618,0.00011480795,0.000280908,0.00008246557,0.3033997,0.00026594373,0.008946326,0.6628245,0.012088111,0.00047205537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011857692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0115882335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13369925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000518386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030680879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567790780","doi":"10.4324/9781315555485-10","title":"On Encountering Life and Learning With/out the Text: Reflections on Bańkowski and Del Mar","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.06679160875432967,"score_gpt":0.3726177473040075,"score_spread":0.30582613854967783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567790780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001857301,0.000043413187,0.0001693154,0.037769347,0.00026908173,0.00016003633,0.0000029384112,0.000054516433,0.9613456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.094781585,0.00034045134,0.00012719474,0.0033546416,0.00038022344,0.000013163114,0.0000017540666,0.000019436135,0.90098155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920845,0.00006735212,0.00013347963,0.0002176388,0.00024256438,0.00013049763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985753,0.00095723063,0.00013812071,0.00012865789,0.00011803927,0.00008264109],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049511885,0.00013065693,0.000101254496,0.000107240936,0.001425483,0.000283861,0.000083209234,0.00012998386,0.0016474755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005748131,0.00007633238,0.000018979777,0.000046027544,0.00025784958,0.00023410606,0.000022549902,0.0006817381,0.00015443788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017603666,0.0000065440404,0.000019423329,0.000003193924,0.000024747917,5.1764295e-7,0.005129639,0.0000011230474,0.0000056045697,0.9832026,0.0035377408,0.008051311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007928488,0.00008628253,0.000059241956,0.00008534071,0.000017625167,0.0000023558966,0.0020320923,0.0000022427014,8.147644e-7,0.008008531,0.98949426,0.00013192763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050150586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035558203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006640622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003505436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568248857","doi":"","title":"Translucency and Morality: An Empirical Test of Moral Dispositions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASAC","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Test (biology); Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0984968853084723,"score_gpt":0.4670561560823152,"score_spread":0.36855927077384293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568248857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8323335,0.000044024895,0.0009849633,0.06946565,0.00018074972,0.00012120808,0.000017588429,0.000041664036,0.096810624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696136,0.000011467518,0.0016670437,0.00064945,0.00010320199,0.0000020689233,0.000008425435,0.000002776223,0.0005941898],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949116,0.000048956317,0.00013526445,0.00007935765,0.00013326021,0.00011199918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994427,0.0002513672,0.00004277185,0.000078648736,0.00009702986,0.00008750193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057444104,0.000033589564,0.000052702948,0.000047279664,0.00023351172,0.0000379576,0.000060651248,0.00004285743,0.00023664364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028378752,0.0000332848,0.000014902832,0.00037451118,0.00017783775,0.00049506983,0.0000038486123,0.000102148646,0.000007812193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016160611,0.00088166853,0.45768726,0.000009514381,0.000012931895,0.0000025929837,0.054472066,4.876918e-7,0.0010954003,0.44852126,0.0034273928,0.03387326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016807437,0.00008187404,0.78174156,0.000006438059,0.000024912812,0.0000017606408,0.010560605,0.00001532625,0.00036058974,0.0071186563,0.19980367,0.000116518866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026206267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026927402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4414026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015387483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016986503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39616212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568347023","doi":"","title":"Lawyering at the Intersection of Public Law and Legal Ethics: Government Lawyers as Custodians of the Rule of Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Custodians; Government (linguistics); Law; Legal ethics; Professional responsibility; Political science; Duty; Accountability; Professional conduct","score_opus":0.02423958591089196,"score_gpt":0.33433971851288885,"score_spread":0.31010013260199687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568347023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77592814,0.00009541892,0.00004419113,0.07468331,0.0006645516,0.00010057642,0.000003734998,0.0000047791973,0.14847527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973592,0.00016446557,0.000019605686,0.00055814505,0.000114714516,0.0000022739314,3.0453003e-7,0.000005193092,0.0017760668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857455,0.00025206673,0.00023695693,0.000069495254,0.00047695474,0.0003899683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898505,0.0002665034,0.00038520485,0.00013033295,0.00019710013,0.000035790712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042275283,0.000053358075,0.00008119118,0.000015979047,0.00072355004,0.00006450233,0.00023997392,0.00008180598,0.00012723103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062566646,0.00003504168,0.000060692615,0.00019528196,0.0007096391,0.00043956874,0.000044329237,0.0022764842,0.000001938384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009497562,0.000035194684,0.0004039633,0.000003675117,0.00003760424,3.873302e-8,0.008269197,0.0000021547226,0.0061554676,0.98414326,0.000027204713,0.0009127481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042729793,0.00017633973,0.001017752,0.000034707395,0.00007975725,0.00013009671,0.10104494,0.000010511723,0.014406228,0.11373573,0.76878846,0.0001482103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026980959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3158579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8704075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040018512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026768069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98903173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568749169","doi":"","title":"Information Sources Used by Lawyers in Problem-Solving: An Empirical Exploration","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Information seeking; Work (physics); Task (project management); Public relations; Focus (optics); Psychology; Empirical research; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Management; Engineering; Information retrieval; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.18681326473365717,"score_gpt":0.4068608228658064,"score_spread":0.2200475581321492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568749169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808307,0.000010159698,0.0008935706,0.011952191,0.00019231236,0.00033102775,0.0000074821487,0.0001602565,0.005622244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941564,0.0000584671,0.00007142066,0.0009930648,0.00008556653,0.0000032591536,0.000110321205,0.000011692007,0.0045098043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980525,0.00060898496,0.00029609754,0.00021756209,0.00046311325,0.00036174175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989445,0.00013530717,0.00024063207,0.00023087139,0.00023197514,0.00021667412],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096257223,0.00015257868,0.00014546142,0.0005530423,0.00059706945,0.0009256188,0.00045842887,0.00020648545,0.00012440296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001995792,0.00018238694,0.000041616815,0.0015126457,0.00013733955,0.02418467,0.00005466671,0.00055382855,0.00021716663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041279767,0.00014766653,0.9398068,0.0000061692735,0.000007773585,0.0000063035377,0.058219258,0.000033885513,0.0000743608,0.0007663182,0.000023542754,0.00086659694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009917701,0.000104865816,0.40277717,0.000051568357,0.000026222351,0.0000043082637,0.07706879,0.0000017075131,0.00015358356,0.000588595,0.51778597,0.00044546666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005208905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038146872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5370297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037003335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004738076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98946357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569875758","doi":"","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE ETHICS AND POLITICS OF ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS STRUCTURES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.06398585931603276,"score_gpt":0.43780275808934227,"score_spread":0.3738168987733095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569875758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5875054,0.002984613,0.005928094,0.3905598,0.0011960444,0.00025030476,0.0000039415413,0.000010586081,0.011561226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938672,0.0030604855,0.000111584595,0.0016821588,0.0007841281,0.0000017949681,3.083077e-7,0.000003870379,0.0004884434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986354,0.00037788288,0.00012835325,0.000049041213,0.00022023136,0.00058907433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849975,0.0008367854,0.00013883747,0.00005042283,0.00039688693,0.0000773067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042799427,0.000047134716,0.00007133768,0.000059550825,0.0009279734,0.00018123174,0.00016883474,0.000046083605,0.000020190404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040368214,0.00003195581,0.000010848979,0.00031176023,0.00026784118,0.00070536585,0.000034766224,0.0016373089,9.0729714e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013993329,0.000009977594,0.00092628127,0.0000049839005,0.000023379447,2.5435288e-8,0.03340037,0.0000032520957,0.0000055631062,0.9639201,0.00010508147,0.0015869485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045467116,0.000023612249,0.014575201,0.000011245048,0.0001446378,0.000056525292,0.0702793,0.000005541467,0.000035852576,0.84980965,0.06450404,0.000099702265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003914403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00228915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40636182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012393521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028119013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7137315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570708826","doi":"","title":"EXPERIENCIAS CLÍNICAS EN CANADÁ Y LA DEFENSA MUNDIALIZADA DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Digitum: Institutional Repository of the University of Murcia (University of Murcia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Geography; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.018357083053443687,"score_gpt":0.279546877978036,"score_spread":0.2611897949245923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570708826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78902423,0.00009119148,0.001076521,0.0019356123,0.0007195236,0.0003008465,0.000096667594,0.000031150226,0.20672424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920787,0.0001385038,0.0009954205,0.00008777083,0.00012903968,7.095655e-8,0.0000141954715,0.000009669958,0.006546595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730533,0.0005408819,0.00037868196,0.00036978876,0.0010129244,0.00039241847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996594,0.0007775939,0.0010394937,0.0005169616,0.0008240351,0.00024790587],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012246838,0.00022518191,0.00042379374,0.00035789653,0.0027155424,0.000050696177,0.0015095328,0.0004166814,0.00023969088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054938276,0.0002888749,0.00042149072,0.0010204766,0.0039956495,0.001186006,0.00033849373,0.0005393912,0.000012934248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014366681,0.0028233768,0.1355652,0.00058790034,0.0010443161,0.00040832124,0.23880485,0.0011078063,0.0074995216,0.5882409,0.016934939,0.005546165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012437915,0.00010208494,0.23957212,0.00047170752,0.0003721546,0.000045058598,0.10276222,0.00006907542,0.0016847668,0.00053654535,0.6527133,0.00042716938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07591581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015893083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63577837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010457862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054196185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573431212","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4562","title":"Bringing the Clinic into the 21st Century","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Ideology; Legal profession; Curriculum; Legal research; Economic Justice; Political science; Legal service; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0667829213781849,"score_gpt":0.42395261766041903,"score_spread":0.35716969628223416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573431212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038509868,0.00026085236,0.00008153881,0.27117398,0.0011789211,0.00043061894,0.0000013513163,0.000053073392,0.6883098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823856,0.00018801968,0.00023225017,0.012837206,0.000841783,0.000009528002,9.950769e-7,0.0000061303035,0.0034985242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892503,0.00016418815,0.00023750971,0.00013466546,0.0003412036,0.00019738398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985704,0.0007066153,0.00015979809,0.00028878875,0.00020729261,0.000067100984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012326592,0.0000679781,0.000083181905,0.00006709612,0.00073681463,0.00037363768,0.0008648149,0.000046989746,0.0007675167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019503383,0.000044952398,0.0000432288,0.00077543006,0.00014408525,0.0006544042,0.00006132188,0.0003018373,0.00021894142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008014198,0.00032880227,0.0017181347,0.00004591195,0.00006378128,0.0000020554744,0.25827694,0.00012360056,0.00048990006,0.48306194,0.09027388,0.16553491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007309809,0.000022862167,0.02175266,0.000021600332,0.00007842951,3.9430958e-7,0.03225032,0.000009573637,0.000083196515,0.001158635,0.94446135,0.00008790716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002310735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039716248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9438757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004392103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039204882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.840377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573499850","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1488265","title":"Born to Be Wild: The 'Trans‐Systemic' Programme at McGill and the De‐Nationalization of Legal Education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal education; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.01709607858701736,"score_gpt":0.33405914580096535,"score_spread":0.316963067213948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573499850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11660342,0.0013974131,0.0043701194,0.8542188,0.00040037007,0.0007648895,0.0000035042383,0.000026382615,0.022215134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906968,0.0010242308,0.00011307982,0.0042318334,0.00027736468,0.00001854424,0.000004526469,0.000004804929,0.0036288078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984079,0.00037606407,0.00024037399,0.00008840208,0.00032357607,0.0005637078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990716,0.00019060282,0.00021098439,0.00009109314,0.00037500367,0.000060693976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004413261,0.00006271111,0.00007556593,0.00007089618,0.0011633007,0.00012833448,0.00017584968,0.000044276014,0.00003165804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007534394,0.00004021112,0.00004075036,0.0005280111,0.00011832188,0.00039310148,0.0000069581547,0.0005821934,0.0000027611752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033893637,0.000053774016,0.00016597788,0.0000013201254,0.000018458382,2.7444834e-8,0.007829117,0.00001784696,0.00007653872,0.96488976,0.00075543433,0.026157862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052323245,0.00010106571,0.0015754778,0.000017550588,0.000059382623,0.00021543122,0.033722658,0.00004376899,0.000040914045,0.17054193,0.79305166,0.00010693303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014825776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008282414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8740934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075562875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053288494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94531506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574503403","doi":"","title":"Justice Bertha Wilson: One Woman's Difference","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Family law; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.04079425639337281,"score_gpt":0.36780347354361553,"score_spread":0.3270092171502427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574503403","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19536486,0.002110413,0.008982718,0.5108131,0.0014201814,0.00025906667,0.0000015799621,0.00015614243,0.28089193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703313,0.0041607074,0.00022011985,0.0031363259,0.0011157764,0.000002173667,0.0000017728073,0.000005716421,0.02102607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976451,0.00018640587,0.00020505115,0.00012936212,0.00040149764,0.0014326079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920756,0.00016033993,0.00017081916,0.0001157957,0.00022172822,0.00012375721],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018659928,0.00008641993,0.00010007062,0.000093342045,0.0011472285,0.00026819351,0.00030887808,0.000073749594,0.00023335703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094093935,0.000084104075,0.000049154623,0.0005206749,0.0000708452,0.00065436366,0.0000073904084,0.0023268538,0.00010515657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012727524,0.00013229219,0.00014089205,7.4514577e-7,0.000019255142,8.1274277e-7,0.003136825,0.0000013871852,0.00010398293,0.9369025,0.00087636156,0.05867222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034286708,0.00024222887,0.0054424885,0.000015912603,0.00009374588,0.00006815121,0.021712847,0.000010261723,0.000019832265,0.64577925,0.326043,0.00022943097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007084822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040118927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7749665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074213295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072888234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575792737","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2604","title":"The Teaching of Procedure Across Common Law Systems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03228174026991738,"score_gpt":0.3822639925704507,"score_spread":0.3499822523005333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575792737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01909626,0.00027161647,0.000039045208,0.040059958,0.0011356603,0.00020521053,0.000002528499,0.00002443666,0.9391653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959209,0.000040171966,0.0001333982,0.0005928143,0.00053747353,0.000014445214,9.881356e-7,0.000007795363,0.0027520098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985265,0.00041287998,0.0003347653,0.000072826115,0.00038340935,0.00026959987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998606,0.0004005397,0.00036844407,0.0001373504,0.0003783094,0.00010935404],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022341644,0.00006581147,0.00010233882,0.000012891968,0.004830061,0.0013493691,0.00036214103,0.00006931925,0.00010009346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031959792,0.000044580545,0.000048345977,0.00012890394,0.0003048546,0.0011702524,0.000024260546,0.00086124486,0.00006602295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025912125,0.00004415901,0.0004983935,0.0000061927667,0.000016683533,4.5421524e-7,0.010191787,0.000013034863,0.00005219781,0.9830891,0.0050600665,0.0010253278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019693968,0.0000340086,0.0007334168,0.00007284659,0.000014550724,0.0000637921,0.06827257,0.000053315856,0.00004525189,0.09396039,0.8364215,0.0001314191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33318406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20321226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97682464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006962313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002415001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578852818","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1313148","title":"The Practice of Ethical Precepts: Dissecting Decision-Making by Lawyers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Ethical decision; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01552135475262058,"score_gpt":0.3956100334382791,"score_spread":0.38008867868565854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578852818","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21951948,0.0082729645,0.034240518,0.5214065,0.004342835,0.0005545369,0.0000038813237,0.00011655022,0.21154279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903782,0.006295441,0.00070986635,0.0007504518,0.00038234732,0.0000034374775,4.996054e-7,0.000008926089,0.0014708579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997414,0.00056892214,0.00034041767,0.00010479854,0.0006096305,0.00096225896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99310833,0.0055563576,0.0004443344,0.00011476742,0.0007166964,0.00005948414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008295829,0.00006769941,0.00008463436,0.000047249818,0.003031952,0.00014079665,0.00033821468,0.0001255513,0.000076452256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03278291,0.00005073025,0.000060906586,0.00056779926,0.0002670941,0.0007407013,0.000019013118,0.004633364,0.00001634256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010655974,0.00011200662,0.00076432916,0.0000011030478,0.00009818365,0.0000011785909,0.019977726,0.000012525349,0.000071521485,0.87671566,0.016527161,0.08561202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015715278,0.00007804065,0.00008862504,0.00002314692,0.000023754645,0.00019897004,0.089299865,0.000011729165,0.00002086524,0.095991746,0.81400424,0.00010189336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082870317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028816303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79747707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055264786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007927988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579376339","doi":"","title":"Tracing trends : the impact of science and technology on the law of criminal evidence and procedure","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Discipline; Scientific evidence; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10407619472656264,"score_gpt":0.38209804877053904,"score_spread":0.2780218540439764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579376339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8685518,0.00013593954,0.000006739339,0.024481181,0.000069810085,0.00007147432,0.0000031660977,0.0000071416466,0.10667277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965554,0.000011092915,0.00009804112,0.00014227732,0.000042921827,0.0000022723918,1.7697595e-8,0.0000022656407,0.0000455709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918556,0.000099836136,0.00016247021,0.00008472226,0.0003119024,0.00015551485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878895,0.00029282397,0.00028417955,0.00010728596,0.0004637212,0.00006301807],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022621215,0.000050962422,0.00007568551,0.00013171777,0.0014939778,0.00009541358,0.00028663702,0.00003119053,0.000112245434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020669862,0.00002570608,0.000021930346,0.001243641,0.0046862178,0.0004540222,0.000024283188,0.0003769508,5.432865e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020209234,0.000034217937,0.0021682803,0.0000031458158,0.000009811055,4.111849e-7,0.19576389,5.907537e-7,0.00024505958,0.79969275,0.00008712399,0.0019745145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025048037,0.00086446234,0.043234244,0.000223126,0.00011777722,0.00015027869,0.9123065,0.00003220254,0.0024035708,0.037491318,0.0027243174,0.0002017507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033762644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075893063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7622014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038333976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007837474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580049906","doi":"","title":"Taking Stock of Taking Stock","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Equity (law); Business; Club deal; Stock (firearms); Private equity; Equity theory; Contingency; Private equity fund; Private equity firm; Equity risk; Finance; Actuarial science; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Duty; Engineering","score_opus":0.06446191931497597,"score_gpt":0.3721154548569552,"score_spread":0.3076535355419792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580049906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28513584,0.00017252426,0.00045671288,0.014408675,0.0010552091,0.000283111,0.00000584733,0.000121706034,0.6983604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869178,0.00003283393,0.0014298522,0.0017474224,0.0006044828,0.000021702135,0.000006028784,0.000013664555,0.009226219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985264,0.00019899909,0.00032395896,0.00020140498,0.00043770426,0.0003115316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985204,0.0002634427,0.0005022208,0.0002637744,0.0003019804,0.00014822581],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000876941,0.00009995294,0.0001476782,0.000088470624,0.0007268786,0.0002068868,0.00030957072,0.00010465581,0.0077433214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019281603,0.000106540894,0.00006350656,0.00089263165,0.00018058064,0.001073512,0.000035622612,0.00039716475,0.00026285506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000235875,0.00019225107,0.043029115,0.0000147897135,0.000035913297,0.000005752084,0.009367999,0.000030557712,0.00079685036,0.9215968,0.0096304,0.015275933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020847714,0.000025495008,0.015312417,0.00003856105,0.000017255552,0.0000031650693,0.0033850784,0.000021289421,0.00016919625,0.0023844556,0.97826606,0.00016853401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04025859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015563531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012295785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005715868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99316376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581399311","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1211","title":"Does Civility Matter?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Misconduct; Loyalty; Political science; Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Law; Sociology; Representation (politics); Criminology; Politics","score_opus":0.04472528224747482,"score_gpt":0.34964435407498284,"score_spread":0.30491907182750805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581399311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007993143,0.000028580691,0.0002262373,0.0778214,0.0014192015,0.000050660015,0.0000025187244,0.000031114192,0.9124271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852148,0.00010742988,0.00097374927,0.002889425,0.0008919889,0.000002917442,0.0000014631712,0.0000061994306,0.009912019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888736,0.00023502558,0.0002135659,0.00010023978,0.00033796555,0.00022583539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992073,0.0001232374,0.00014335293,0.00012252622,0.00023960616,0.00016397887],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079502625,0.00006237309,0.00008031459,0.000038694758,0.0026617737,0.00023640106,0.00020656828,0.00005974557,0.00916102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022078036,0.00004206552,0.00005576864,0.00020512578,0.0002646728,0.0010400969,0.000014422975,0.0005489151,0.00066469866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009524748,0.00015251557,0.0221784,0.0000028737038,0.000019021194,0.000020024436,0.010443105,0.0000018200453,0.00006678927,0.9303808,0.03586519,0.0008599317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014346802,0.000009756217,0.012058061,0.000007967474,0.000008347519,0.00009878933,0.002372572,0.0000012337877,0.00008291727,0.070665896,0.9144396,0.000111349545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07362424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13803007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97722167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091494105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004697906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584692578","doi":"10.21991/c9wm20","title":"Lost in Translation: Social Realities, Insite, and the Law in Legal Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Translation (biology); Legal education; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04068595896223407,"score_gpt":0.34353909076111633,"score_spread":0.30285313179888224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584692578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008920378,0.002644103,0.0015205987,0.21173212,0.0024560452,0.0009397692,0.00005815448,0.000055464163,0.7716734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926578,0.000147009,0.0003831211,0.00540514,0.0004941204,0.00013688761,0.00008803212,0.000005257736,0.00068266795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979122,0.0003743728,0.00055358786,0.00022696165,0.00038331505,0.00054953806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998845,0.000523897,0.00015955383,0.00013768084,0.00020655483,0.00012732715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017218677,0.00016610039,0.00021693988,0.0002687987,0.0017915453,0.00023786612,0.0001778305,0.00018440014,0.00025287384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065630267,0.00015147254,0.00008294517,0.0009084739,0.0076447288,0.0031551993,0.000038030612,0.000502415,0.000067969566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070258895,0.00020856349,0.016180435,0.000012630677,0.00001056277,7.98707e-7,0.0060950713,0.000015091445,0.0000038492794,0.97316694,0.0023732923,0.0018625122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016495128,0.0000056697136,0.0043981457,0.00007555804,0.000023415914,0.000038683516,0.032952815,0.0000299788,0.0000046910523,0.03697444,0.9236011,0.00024597716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0130736865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026101233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036906794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044708936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584774729","doi":"","title":"Administrative Justice & Adjudicative Ethics in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Economic Justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Foundation (evidence); Public administration; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.08996048298872213,"score_gpt":0.42929580046101873,"score_spread":0.3393353174722966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584774729","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27368912,0.0036743465,0.001485564,0.4424089,0.0035733804,0.00036617735,0.000009987101,0.00002775781,0.27476478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941982,0.0015373838,0.00006904699,0.0016071679,0.00057491875,0.0000059968593,0.0000019984648,0.000005372383,0.001999902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973112,0.0005323049,0.00020224054,0.00007158783,0.00038647995,0.0014962159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987194,0.0006816963,0.00018250167,0.000063608946,0.00021251022,0.00014026307],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048936345,0.00006410601,0.000076378594,0.00006276621,0.0006451519,0.000052606883,0.00018464641,0.000064841435,0.00022657754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029237315,0.00006350142,0.000018678678,0.0005363271,0.00007138968,0.0007939724,0.0000082739725,0.0050775004,0.00002695662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008660973,0.000051934963,0.009213881,0.0000014238162,0.00001991286,6.032977e-7,0.025905011,0.000001891386,0.0000050407975,0.96152264,0.0010186486,0.0022503317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022216239,0.000038770973,0.010157942,0.000012083426,0.000040767343,0.000038528964,0.64011943,0.0000037771722,0.00002000046,0.06236051,0.28680822,0.0001777974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9236303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8991622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053741233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16480531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584821635","doi":"","title":"Globalizing Approaches to Legal Education and Training: Canada to Japan","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Prime minister; Institution; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Training (meteorology); Law; Training system; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.1796698798122861,"score_gpt":0.3661295201458155,"score_spread":0.1864596403335294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584821635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122501455,0.000012532984,0.00010311565,0.38858876,0.00028696572,0.00012972618,0.0000011972435,0.000021578606,0.48835465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489372,0.0000011203516,0.008392725,0.019165188,0.00047861983,0.000022210575,0.000002669964,0.0000032944915,0.02299698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993867,0.00004160107,0.000105474755,0.00012897821,0.00017897018,0.00015823911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995566,0.00005641017,0.000024648189,0.00007227787,0.00006559372,0.0002244742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031478243,0.00004696845,0.000048186263,0.000051751256,0.00034948083,0.00016129312,0.000088606976,0.000023512492,0.0002780955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046693799,0.000048274873,0.000006498,0.0004737034,0.000019256211,0.00044793801,0.000012439264,0.0000693029,0.000026839572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018280067,0.000038442446,0.000735092,0.0000013068532,0.0000035161652,3.568013e-8,0.045267157,0.000016616246,0.000013134287,0.6813586,0.11707842,0.15548584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019280082,0.000004931892,0.0029632624,0.0000026390603,0.0000024933183,9.400256e-7,0.07427548,0.00000744571,0.000018066035,0.0001041811,0.9225321,0.00006922587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8684441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9742174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82643574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024041955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050203935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8905963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588099873","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2792","title":"Towards a Pedagogy of Diversity in Legal Education","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Diversity (politics); Scholarship; Legal profession; Political science; Normative; Promotion (chess); Experiential learning; Sociology; Legal research; Norm (philosophy); Economic Justice; Identity (music); Pedagogy; Law; Public relations","score_opus":0.14066691913963547,"score_gpt":0.44365810830520264,"score_spread":0.30299118916556717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588099873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027406322,0.00007828775,0.00010709827,0.028040797,0.0011707158,0.0000602016,0.0000014716825,0.000008947823,0.94312614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99626243,0.00003219792,0.0011469669,0.0005435322,0.00036237968,0.0000015854971,0.000001880006,0.0000032094904,0.0016457937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989717,0.00023811846,0.00020641653,0.000070941736,0.00036948943,0.00014334141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990172,0.000045245597,0.00018569379,0.00007512443,0.0005184187,0.00015831034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001430315,0.0000465901,0.00008677981,0.00010329893,0.00045664652,0.00011471114,0.00020394284,0.000058614707,0.00034561212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060440984,0.000047352834,0.000033216562,0.00032558152,0.0001124621,0.0011202424,0.00004639428,0.00038057673,0.000024812185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015285443,0.00020978216,0.0071664434,0.0000020344442,0.000005316006,0.0000018495826,0.017930424,0.000007792913,0.000008816861,0.9661073,0.004018138,0.004526818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065750076,0.000075656724,0.011171959,0.00003602812,0.000024786279,0.000050719595,0.06611511,0.00000847641,0.00007211032,0.19078034,0.7308365,0.00017080894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5261496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37847194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96885616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021499583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043213274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.766585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588591003","doi":"","title":"Literary Evidence and Legal Aesthetics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Discipline; Legal writing; Legal education; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Law and literature; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies; Law; Legal research; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Comparative law; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.18396325333503355,"score_gpt":0.45482443160075975,"score_spread":0.2708611782657262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588591003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24230811,0.00056799955,0.00008595553,0.07892771,0.00033265472,0.00009270514,2.868701e-7,0.0000670463,0.67761755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674435,0.00017647717,0.0021347764,0.0011057033,0.00008277796,0.000003942239,2.783689e-7,0.0000029847058,0.02904951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996027,0.000075484684,0.000056113102,0.00007438942,0.00009860157,0.00009276237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965256,0.00009653263,0.000035437377,0.00008344837,0.00007360686,0.000058428774],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034188118,0.00003135807,0.00003199144,0.000029425077,0.00021588667,0.00010469732,0.00007332609,0.000029440185,0.000939029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045369263,0.000030719766,0.0000083763925,0.00020438853,0.00011587988,0.00069707306,0.0000132769155,0.000108768145,0.00008957334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005790087,0.000039658215,0.0031897647,0.0000030580784,0.0000024417604,0.0000029994453,0.23801263,1.8933653e-8,0.000032381442,0.7441692,0.0067874766,0.0077545876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003099337,0.000018655652,0.0058942763,0.000014996453,0.000005339046,0.0000040023647,0.014491893,0.0000025168333,0.000067363,0.0038379086,0.9755685,0.00006359556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058390875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037836362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014275204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002310905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589345877","doi":"","title":"Unbundled Legal Services: Untying the Bundle in New York State","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œFordham urban law journal/Fordham urban law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unbundling; Population; Business; Eviction; Law; Legislation; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04412532712864885,"score_gpt":0.29598988626212835,"score_spread":0.2518645591334795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589345877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057591505,0.012297781,0.001627398,0.20640996,0.01733023,0.0021548488,0.000056396442,0.000413693,0.70211816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522518,0.0007503308,0.0006009128,0.010646433,0.0071103913,0.000023397142,0.0000073861897,0.000121586236,0.028487787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917759,0.0017961832,0.0020632143,0.00051066786,0.0019980946,0.0018559641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99431485,0.0011124687,0.0019012806,0.0008432431,0.0007846413,0.0010435438],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006758613,0.000642561,0.0006499495,0.0003813869,0.012265036,0.0066240393,0.0027011714,0.00032530728,0.0046337363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025153242,0.0004395342,0.0005163496,0.0025923257,0.0010167888,0.0048307762,0.00015625387,0.0061283614,0.0004058912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019066833,0.0009706519,0.0052468865,0.000040528772,0.000433825,0.00016736035,0.0800319,0.00084858044,0.0000425045,0.6355425,0.2704829,0.0060017207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014822516,0.00018037274,0.00039606984,0.00021394811,0.00011632864,0.0013948678,0.026152637,0.00039586952,0.000013271562,0.018176435,0.9508967,0.00058127457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06000351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24846436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8946603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010811373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014840798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590955778","doi":"","title":"Charting the Growth of Animal Law in Education","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Subject (documents); Face (sociological concept); Law; Political science; Legal education; Wish; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.06764738697303534,"score_gpt":0.39537864921536897,"score_spread":0.3277312622423336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590955778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37088808,0.0000149798,0.0000060232264,0.06412408,0.00013172736,0.000058965412,1.3709071e-7,0.000008751111,0.56476724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961798,0.000013318244,0.00022966544,0.0018131374,0.00010149351,0.000007538913,7.043995e-7,0.0000012909678,0.0016530091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961716,0.00007352427,0.00010749836,0.000040056013,0.00010029696,0.00006145119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999632,0.00012956165,0.00005544841,0.000046560846,0.00012285988,0.000013571098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004123993,0.000017884782,0.000026669952,0.00002806684,0.00025921664,0.000015684189,0.00007421542,0.00001709995,0.00037144453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045756192,0.00001331555,0.000009380917,0.00043296564,0.00012627708,0.00034594513,0.0000050999756,0.000079368445,0.000022509399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016728812,0.00005837593,0.009100597,8.589405e-7,6.295456e-7,3.402753e-8,0.024049385,6.545324e-8,0.00016622749,0.96367294,0.0025664684,0.00038275882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016721999,0.000039289826,0.16269447,0.000013579287,0.0000056025624,0.000003632033,0.09567463,0.000024256811,0.0026304487,0.015385192,0.7232154,0.00014627888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039126076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004848278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9482877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022646895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005623945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96727246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591040560","doi":"10.7202/1007820ar","title":"John Mark Keyes, Executive Legislation, 2d ed (Markham: LexisNexis, 2010), pp 611. ISBN 978-0-43-346025-1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Library science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06860858094544267,"score_gpt":0.3305393646357795,"score_spread":0.26193078369033684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591040560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005076994,0.00032333884,0.00030123733,0.02150558,0.004055559,0.00024870035,0.000040428775,0.00009840801,0.97291905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95635235,0.0013224726,0.006530509,0.0035403229,0.0020631386,0.000030625375,0.000027226939,0.000053032323,0.030080311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707353,0.0006369821,0.0006521992,0.00030199156,0.0007399629,0.00059531943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974004,0.00028098922,0.0006177813,0.00030177372,0.0010066302,0.00039241233],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002253096,0.00022438657,0.0002436515,0.00016468193,0.0073707835,0.000411153,0.0005307665,0.00021812871,0.010474056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008711504,0.00021446981,0.00015276475,0.00071947643,0.0004279548,0.0027958292,0.000056906254,0.0011933023,0.00087459566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006260221,0.00023013388,0.00065334945,0.000003978323,0.00007553092,0.000017614018,0.007282096,0.0000010330289,0.000028286753,0.786868,0.20140001,0.0033773736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038431707,0.000056232326,0.0020713494,0.000030647305,0.000046296398,0.000056685647,0.0056395982,0.000004751877,0.0001340888,0.011666035,0.97962505,0.000284967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033779755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022282036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95584464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031974723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043435622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591788322","doi":"10.1023/a:1009205626028","title":"Barriers to Gender Equality in the Canadian Legal Establishment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Queen's University","funders":"Canadian Bar Association","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Political science; Privilege (computing); Legislature; Government (linguistics); Practice of law; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.10928262914200731,"score_gpt":0.4240002035658897,"score_spread":0.3147175744238824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591788322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045694694,0.00014140304,7.727415e-7,0.19952135,0.0004854582,0.00028381325,0.000018541688,0.00002296148,0.753831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591482,0.000042962456,0.000083777566,0.027601076,0.00030500753,0.00010174768,0.0000035483426,0.0000052602477,0.012708414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983291,0.00035869522,0.00024567882,0.00020557092,0.00043673388,0.00042422177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990729,0.00026996364,0.00004036215,0.00019334654,0.00013183862,0.0002915797],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002183566,0.000103126076,0.00012608407,0.00009823549,0.0022452008,0.00063552236,0.0003370327,0.000054860633,0.0019805117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019311174,0.000082229686,0.000034434473,0.0010244084,0.0002584591,0.00046764262,0.000017797873,0.0003248919,0.00024476615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014856112,0.000042059797,0.008692152,0.0000052416003,0.000037309885,0.000014412281,0.3638064,0.000016532742,9.4312804e-7,0.3998895,0.22414376,0.0033368126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000623411,0.000013190743,0.006833403,0.0000040945847,0.0000072717808,0.0000011138177,0.12248447,4.940297e-7,0.0000020629263,0.0003883203,0.87010235,0.0001008713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75653994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94209695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9134535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005890409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026850686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592677246","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2509596","title":"Canada's 'Top Sex Crime Lawyers': The Ethical Parameters of Commercial Expression by the Criminal Defence Bar","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Bar (unit); Political science; Law; Criminal law; Expression (computer science); Criminal procedure; Psychology; Physics; Computer science","score_opus":0.023267172678540678,"score_gpt":0.33381607274901215,"score_spread":0.3105489000704715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592677246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33468908,0.0006083861,0.005928414,0.6266626,0.0011839715,0.00028799757,0.0000086401005,0.000022533404,0.030608376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991869,0.0002081192,0.000064510554,0.006322361,0.00028638696,0.000005133253,0.0000017611308,0.000006579628,0.0012361608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969974,0.0011341557,0.00025977223,0.00010737646,0.00062082225,0.0008804566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981082,0.0011906963,0.00025021294,0.00017537078,0.00019667727,0.00007884581],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005527123,0.00008461538,0.00010365203,0.000024748462,0.0015814044,0.00012959682,0.00060280686,0.000105698186,0.00011046215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018237251,0.00005078683,0.000054164444,0.00023216463,0.00034829002,0.00017594118,0.000025223711,0.004024723,0.000006269709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040306488,0.0000613309,0.0006636712,0.000003371888,0.00004316148,2.6134342e-7,0.011710269,0.000016590666,0.0005388553,0.8792478,0.087972775,0.01970164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032814604,0.00013861296,0.0013400051,0.000021785989,0.00009108945,0.000049463586,0.07361376,0.0000512284,0.0012366242,0.059552185,0.86336726,0.00020982041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52231526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5626866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8196956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004811004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014869892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159303357","doi":"","title":"Links Between Physical and Legal Structures of Community Title Schemes and Disputes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scheme (mathematics); Political science; Legal research; Sociology; Law and economics; Public relations; Mathematics","score_opus":0.016663170842689947,"score_gpt":0.2910143884957169,"score_spread":0.274351217653027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159303357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9592603,0.000016080516,0.00006218564,0.005254323,0.000014273829,0.000029260731,0.0000071250943,0.000022543813,0.03533393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998331,0.000015892085,0.00076147576,0.0000069164157,0.000016866057,3.2771545e-8,0.0000024810656,0.0000010902193,0.0008642401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998086,0.000027204143,0.000036723763,0.000039695988,0.000043851145,0.00004394164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997627,0.000058054473,0.000048446913,0.00007237943,0.00004652318,0.000011902389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007464608,0.000026132573,0.00006634058,0.00007071167,0.00016081358,0.00000617886,0.00008418745,0.00009055057,0.00005445838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057551915,0.000027404812,0.0000093912595,0.00012773756,0.00044680355,0.00007617874,0.00004942428,0.00023630886,0.0000032718954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005231158,0.00006611665,0.1655545,0.00001828333,0.000025744102,7.4658993e-7,0.0018076407,2.4930694e-7,0.00046596376,0.80722564,0.0025238951,0.022306003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001951541,0.000022961538,0.3694238,0.000009875048,0.00002886415,6.839824e-7,0.005283394,0.0000033984518,0.0014556056,0.04213644,0.58136445,0.00007539531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005471598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043913975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7650892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000068522104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043272485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8271456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593406988","doi":"","title":"Restructuring of the jurisprudence course taught at the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03029370895015538,"score_gpt":0.3173657925887737,"score_spread":0.2870720836386183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593406988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5700046,0.000016079191,1.646419e-7,0.24679859,0.007933527,0.00059306785,0.000020744352,0.00001285637,0.17462038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852025,0.0000050047174,0.00003978188,0.0008227298,0.00090913055,0.00016164614,0.000001065016,0.0000052262462,0.012852925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989445,0.00015513491,0.00014796572,0.00010581803,0.00037274722,0.00027378902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988885,0.0003055296,0.00018299036,0.0003159485,0.00016758259,0.00013947979],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013709412,0.00005315816,0.000056553734,0.00003409202,0.001801102,0.00012443362,0.00045597058,0.00007884125,0.00051472255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036794245,0.000033423097,0.00003492815,0.00058775884,0.00045233476,0.00033049742,0.00003819506,0.00049892394,0.00001817062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003955678,0.00009609317,0.031625424,0.000009467812,0.00006712358,0.0000037418406,0.022058874,0.000009781254,0.0002944645,0.76959723,0.15566666,0.020531574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005732747,6.801681e-7,0.2850563,7.734126e-7,0.0000145554495,0.0000027058643,0.00071417214,5.250167e-7,0.00035990548,0.000861697,0.71289164,0.000039763378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34350157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9570671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7687355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015783572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002895338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595128131","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2273323","title":"Gender and Race in the Construction of 'Legal Professionalism': Historical Perspectives","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03678269491204473,"score_gpt":0.3664595970782667,"score_spread":0.329676902166222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595128131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73848313,0.01069275,0.001740669,0.1308822,0.0013815608,0.00032741588,7.642813e-7,0.000016295566,0.1164752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967637,0.001314109,0.00022590107,0.000107810316,0.000095468175,0.000003196139,1.830836e-7,0.0000025065078,0.0014871175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985838,0.00057195226,0.00014826906,0.000069389534,0.00022961876,0.0003969988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994918,0.0001842127,0.00012594549,0.00004598824,0.00013276725,0.000019274805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032634947,0.000039916893,0.00006055771,0.00007695209,0.00036906038,0.000043667438,0.00008361931,0.00004111839,0.00006687379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095572555,0.000029092547,0.000021797077,0.00035698386,0.00011332672,0.00038185698,0.0000030959943,0.001264761,0.0000011613292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068541394,0.000057095764,0.0025738392,8.1968506e-7,0.000008652598,2.3885815e-7,0.026205769,4.134439e-7,0.000019295196,0.9700716,0.00018429372,0.0008711235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001974334,0.000029486027,0.0026590715,0.0000036983522,0.000009985955,0.00015180634,0.47104406,9.0202127e-7,0.0000051573406,0.3279705,0.19787595,0.000051937568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087119365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010714139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6421011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008753307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005710852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595495247","doi":"10.11575/prism/29758","title":"Open Access and the Open Access Authors Fund","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Medical education; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.577698823687253,"score_gpt":0.6107544825506229,"score_spread":0.03305565886336992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595495247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056549147,0.000024222127,0.000013517866,0.13637063,0.00038744733,0.0014173884,0.000008045474,0.000001635689,0.805228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8479252,0.00013121079,0.0013147235,0.003082055,0.00017532376,0.00014326697,0.000011957254,0.000009067528,0.14720719],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998625,0.00045455323,0.00021931283,0.00028377763,0.00021935749,0.00019803082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872106,0.00047372264,0.00020486525,0.00031034616,0.00016896355,0.00012104306],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002962508,0.00008200135,0.0001615307,0.000047147885,0.0023998336,0.029208472,0.009962011,0.000061491475,0.018096827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010495742,0.000058941427,0.00001688857,0.00088430196,0.00050317356,0.018041668,0.0062161926,0.00024784956,0.00026716897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043300804,0.0004040655,0.022853533,0.0000046258347,0.000114356204,0.000015590218,0.15882786,0.0000069836487,0.000012918669,0.24066351,0.3716412,0.20502236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069775776,0.0000065273275,0.008690129,0.000007671987,0.000014442964,0.0000042663587,0.0045162095,0.0000066835332,0.00004300178,0.0030144274,0.98288685,0.00011205487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07423229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018034382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79137605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043058488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019695594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596681594","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1191","title":"Conceptualizing Reflective Practice for Legal Professionals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective practice; Conceptualization; Rigour; Engineering ethics; Legal practice; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.08073064703695744,"score_gpt":0.5121997335205556,"score_spread":0.43146908648359816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596681594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01024649,0.000049519294,0.0009588746,0.5344903,0.00076528935,0.00017633745,0.0000050276994,0.000012759249,0.4532954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96426654,0.000017445223,0.0016726294,0.02618961,0.0061775804,0.0000045005327,8.3449896e-7,0.0000058250157,0.001665024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894035,0.00040067622,0.00024448824,0.000056192373,0.00021464632,0.00014366215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976743,0.00090514217,0.0004714217,0.000027367476,0.0008529862,0.00006881831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019263941,0.00004793377,0.00012528103,0.00006260966,0.0011340573,0.00017307732,0.00008153397,0.00007754058,0.000020434205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004197499,0.000042190633,0.00005508866,0.00016049757,0.00021383978,0.0012666393,0.000009577757,0.00024136568,0.000001991748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035737303,0.00006283552,0.000004145529,0.0000041344265,0.00001987399,1.9164293e-7,0.06319227,1.3955051e-7,0.000047224457,0.9259087,0.008984301,0.0017404428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028565206,0.0000726667,0.00005040596,0.000008657721,0.000022649403,0.000005283329,0.031766523,0.000001159285,0.000024210482,0.03349539,0.9342166,0.000050758772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00379149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002982291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9540201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085828186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00125714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8722366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596981095","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2436438","title":"Personal Plight Legal Practice and Tomorrow's Lawyers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Practice of law; Legal practice; Legal ethics; Political science; Legal profession; Psychology","score_opus":0.010239818862905894,"score_gpt":0.3277012573914401,"score_spread":0.31746143852853426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596981095","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06684752,0.001067882,0.00452293,0.5066074,0.0011438455,0.00015638475,0.0000011390274,0.00007245282,0.41958043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98124874,0.0012530141,0.0003432085,0.0025578996,0.001110916,0.0000033343117,0.0000013432918,0.000009591808,0.013471927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978723,0.00039284665,0.00016637177,0.0001346436,0.00036256193,0.0010712685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898136,0.00039438924,0.00017830907,0.00006709002,0.00025105156,0.0001277846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005046552,0.00008013726,0.000083810985,0.00008599181,0.0011227485,0.0004211907,0.00014932072,0.00006761951,0.00018344587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024008837,0.00007574167,0.00003709058,0.00028965893,0.00013334167,0.0017235966,0.000013483129,0.0020464873,0.00006386131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019523108,0.0000429081,0.00025364282,9.205117e-7,0.000032334938,7.0036754e-7,0.0052986504,4.924029e-7,0.000030076344,0.97701424,0.0018485239,0.015458011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022246072,0.000079780715,0.00015166242,0.0000037164098,0.000029868159,0.00023497635,0.037170447,0.000022975239,0.000005626613,0.040357836,0.921616,0.00010462696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027535327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00631327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93665636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047577723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058224574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597300592","doi":"10.21991/c9bd53","title":"An Argument Against Accreditation of Trinity Western University's Proposed Law School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Accreditation; Consolidation (business); Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Management; Library science; Sociology; Medicine; Accounting; Computer science; Ethnology; Economics","score_opus":0.029456278135004763,"score_gpt":0.3230202419182415,"score_spread":0.29356396378323674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597300592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07457381,0.00006207005,0.15581524,0.046781536,0.003952448,0.0014574471,0.00031341417,0.00042940397,0.7166146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950843,0.000025709682,0.0019112774,0.0018534767,0.00026133488,0.000009991737,0.00024239128,0.000006220765,0.00060532015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977522,0.00038250256,0.00046851262,0.00036153418,0.00060373294,0.00043150116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976873,0.0003082855,0.00036105613,0.0003418569,0.00095018453,0.00035132337],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010144506,0.00018900975,0.00023619428,0.00026963302,0.0022116138,0.000174015,0.0004225599,0.00019154306,0.0003532772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011663439,0.00021010196,0.00011445725,0.0006791366,0.0050058286,0.002816659,0.000051956868,0.00034365174,0.0001826649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059650723,0.00030232721,0.011620403,0.000011617428,0.00003609605,0.0000019722804,0.00042515158,0.00043849632,0.00047539215,0.9844044,0.0013047176,0.0009197835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014419003,0.00010619539,0.0018178257,0.00007866665,0.00005980731,0.00000882428,0.010916585,0.00023937976,0.00053971313,0.015230657,0.9691779,0.0003825256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013956822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031053405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9691737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038818098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005109295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597645875","doi":"","title":"The Psychology of Good Character","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Relevance (law); Pace; Context (archaeology); Psychological research; Psychology; Process (computing); Social psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028165679688652998,"score_gpt":0.3680531556319626,"score_spread":0.3398874759433096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597645875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25749257,0.000034846107,0.000012701744,0.12159071,0.0027736933,0.00013941484,0.0000047926737,0.000039892046,0.6179114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826932,0.000037687507,0.00039733254,0.004638911,0.0005588672,0.000019267865,0.0000031653963,0.0000059042763,0.0116456775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992044,0.00013177325,0.00018735087,0.00011012233,0.00018588096,0.00018047531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989617,0.00032420503,0.0001373331,0.0002917482,0.00019930916,0.00008573923],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010255834,0.000049666833,0.00006587382,0.000023324592,0.0006722627,0.00013079494,0.00031227028,0.00009462135,0.002040374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009786192,0.00003763295,0.00003617295,0.00028291254,0.0003847179,0.00041493916,0.00001656764,0.0005471912,0.00057988573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053848325,0.000049564063,0.0029223294,9.3304527e-7,0.000007549463,1.9521397e-7,0.0009775152,2.9842244e-8,0.0026631146,0.9791254,0.012205245,0.002042743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008437554,0.00000823537,0.017922478,0.0000015487306,0.0000044371336,9.3741306e-7,0.00047578945,3.3785543e-7,0.00023136818,0.0067478493,0.97447443,0.0000482261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004302746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019037254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97237754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010898153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029270927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159820614","doi":"10.29173/alr39","title":"The Great Disconnect: Reconnecting the Academy to the Profession","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Legal education; Legal profession; Law; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Sociology; Bridge (graph theory); Medicine","score_opus":0.06065598923198726,"score_gpt":0.41915576628218565,"score_spread":0.35849977705019836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159820614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041602948,0.0036467575,0.000010361497,0.75731355,0.00060143525,0.0006774078,2.6798264e-7,0.000013017853,0.23732117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63417715,0.021836774,0.00007352745,0.28645477,0.0019717717,0.00070223445,0.000004902894,0.000026854153,0.054752056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978344,0.0012890634,0.00026392413,0.00015270691,0.00022475346,0.0002351605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99276984,0.0065592607,0.00017848353,0.0003460715,0.000085240725,0.00006113272],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048924875,0.000082074366,0.00010938206,0.000006869198,0.004063074,0.0002715006,0.0006347917,0.000042161733,0.00040070238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010182444,0.00003228186,0.000060759252,0.0006122481,0.00014855588,0.00032293895,0.000061708284,0.00042380608,0.00073681254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.243227e-7,0.000004867919,0.00004775861,0.000020988362,0.0000059987115,1.0191524e-8,0.0037360974,1.889276e-7,8.317221e-7,0.8841982,0.059073236,0.052910894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020215813,0.000005824497,0.00010829324,0.0003759832,0.000028519744,0.0000011747635,0.0010705364,0.0000032112519,0.000004838471,0.0020054027,0.9963131,0.0000629096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015158875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064327225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9372398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032213306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012404041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99815524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598261752","doi":"","title":"What Is Access to Justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Economic Justice; Identity (music); Political science; Immigration; Criminology; Politics; Identity politics; Population; Race (biology); Compensation (psychology); Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04319766066247593,"score_gpt":0.431259581941641,"score_spread":0.38806192127916506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598261752","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027799817,0.0011861649,0.0025701665,0.9070431,0.0019483989,0.00014793927,6.359802e-7,0.000041666455,0.059262097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91733974,0.0101840375,0.00026671123,0.02701765,0.0030353253,0.000007156098,8.6816425e-7,0.000010754531,0.042137776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980694,0.00011084826,0.0001741334,0.00011111963,0.000324592,0.001209906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930185,0.00009789959,0.000103249695,0.00009779481,0.00025920503,0.00013997043],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022782388,0.000062621635,0.000062759245,0.000120448785,0.0009200091,0.0014333081,0.0004251681,0.000049619382,0.0011062713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042457783,0.00006109629,0.000038069975,0.0006350925,0.000033813307,0.004785145,0.00002272324,0.0014748746,0.00061559735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012982414,0.00007333231,0.00017583414,0.000001235403,0.000031842483,3.1048182e-7,0.018945497,0.000022277598,0.000022848284,0.7780071,0.037495743,0.16521099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090116184,0.000024877034,0.00012589306,0.000006731547,0.000025551082,0.000017643468,0.038762253,0.0000044237127,0.000029519948,0.042188678,0.9186387,0.000085636675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006500746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013913967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8895399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001019357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008080914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598901683","doi":"10.3968/7313","title":"The Application of Mutual Education Mode of College Students in the Teaching of Ideological and Moral Cultivation and Legal Basi","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Morality; Task (project management); Subjectivity; Charisma; Sociology; Mathematics education; Politics; Pedagogy; Cognition; Psychology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.051944131311207724,"score_gpt":0.45211179908929394,"score_spread":0.4001676677780862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598901683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9553152,0.000071255,0.000032751635,0.010263899,0.00032204582,0.00035900887,0.0000043185605,0.0000039637507,0.033627585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854577,0.000012254583,0.0004966432,0.00013403871,0.00009952869,0.000039227634,0.0000035746766,0.000002070902,0.0006669194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845904,0.00029560985,0.00035098946,0.00013350055,0.00065600965,0.000104829465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984184,0.00030289197,0.00047395512,0.000107863314,0.0006550792,0.00004183685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002771287,0.000053432424,0.000105709354,0.00011221186,0.00042158787,0.00005092601,0.00035940128,0.000051977062,0.000005008803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008522572,0.000038739443,0.000015585396,0.00097512576,0.0014085383,0.00066442066,0.000038762966,0.00013358479,3.3262143e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014018817,0.0003434626,0.05301042,0.00000794794,0.000001982488,4.4026187e-9,0.031703684,0.0000010989928,0.0008523047,0.90950996,0.00049645297,0.004058679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016017669,0.000044592285,0.88669604,0.000014867982,0.000012049091,4.876784e-7,0.07170086,0.000020829164,0.00024684795,0.012105173,0.028938837,0.00005924649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075674923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017002644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8974048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087366745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002386828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599219878","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1325051","title":"Learning to Act Like a Lawyer: A Model Code of Professional Responsiblity for Law Students","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Code (set theory); Legal ethics; Professional responsibility; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.0357963517469291,"score_gpt":0.44387019972713815,"score_spread":0.40807384798020907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599219878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.831957,0.00017432291,0.014414773,0.13509633,0.0006204585,0.00078811665,0.000008920469,0.000062443556,0.016877636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98091143,0.000104634346,0.00091218075,0.0017606308,0.00018337378,0.00001117873,0.0000025118898,0.000006561405,0.016107524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979247,0.00027547212,0.00027080844,0.00012456164,0.000501329,0.0009031317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895495,0.00020756864,0.00021496984,0.00008233772,0.0004359116,0.00010423643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005783363,0.000071293085,0.00011720258,0.0001289396,0.0009256424,0.00011718506,0.00031922417,0.000068045636,0.00003027955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009939491,0.00006628016,0.0000678859,0.00045630228,0.0000453797,0.00051432976,0.000016446707,0.0014429995,0.000007654083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003424073,0.00033425904,0.00061673607,0.0000020458383,0.00003518147,1.5387424e-7,0.013807747,0.0004627908,0.000542418,0.97736007,0.0016216987,0.004874464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011961923,0.0010716539,0.0020594813,0.000053652642,0.000053512627,0.00001586452,0.035646975,0.00059442513,0.00012787122,0.6541646,0.30473077,0.00028497426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031465475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005801017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3231955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054051203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009968076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600378010","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1593709","title":"No Longer a Moot Point: The Importance of Advocacy in the Law School Curriculum","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Law; Political science; Legal education; Point (geometry); Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010132058736522172,"score_gpt":0.3300269255124898,"score_spread":0.3198948667759676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600378010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63447267,0.00048043017,0.00006389864,0.17369267,0.00092844904,0.00029130245,8.390181e-7,0.000013726925,0.190056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99501926,0.00036639703,0.00004321042,0.002219257,0.0006737726,0.000010824103,7.5055414e-7,0.0000053845733,0.0016611544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982258,0.0002811985,0.0002694226,0.00008603475,0.0003571185,0.0007804354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902004,0.0002202815,0.0002562197,0.00019442644,0.0002655725,0.00004344205],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006434564,0.000065166,0.00007456434,0.00004759759,0.00060279726,0.0001562994,0.0005590078,0.000057055073,0.00058464106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015950532,0.00003741054,0.000057686488,0.00059999333,0.00020942422,0.000609535,0.000012772878,0.004109183,0.00007459361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048173683,0.00009205384,0.010687869,7.1150475e-7,0.000011732708,4.6539938e-7,0.005483455,6.9625196e-7,0.00006402335,0.9816331,0.00145336,0.0005676871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036112536,0.00007699024,0.007551278,0.000010769398,0.000024563755,0.00010217658,0.09556348,0.000012310826,0.000015142272,0.38316393,0.5129774,0.00014080199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069839535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14154354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5984692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017224223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007147185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602203480","doi":"","title":"Desert Island Disks (Ten Reveries on Pedagogy in Law and the Humanities)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); Representation (politics); Legal education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08573710240636744,"score_gpt":0.4135320981597265,"score_spread":0.3277949957533591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602203480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0767501,0.000038627823,0.000008903558,0.059493203,0.0001149599,0.000095086274,8.8474934e-7,0.000013467695,0.86348474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93218803,0.00013316308,0.00003976112,0.009415583,0.000091339505,0.000012302694,0.0000013190079,0.0000021034618,0.05811637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951524,0.00014005373,0.00008446873,0.00006403343,0.0001092742,0.00008695563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994411,0.00040960513,0.000026895688,0.00006922949,0.000040462273,0.000012701501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038405706,0.000033394732,0.000050928706,0.000026670981,0.00086711114,0.00011167216,0.00006936004,0.00002572227,0.0008328413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027800933,0.000021479707,0.000009508529,0.00013813976,0.0009632554,0.00033093253,0.000010415827,0.00012781836,0.000034922512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014259982,0.000016523007,0.0020597829,6.1791576e-7,0.0000016613675,5.9618395e-7,0.054349016,2.461356e-7,4.958767e-7,0.9369633,0.006470079,0.0001233845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024961913,0.000009421199,0.004773038,0.0000024464482,0.000001788749,0.0000016532448,0.020116238,0.0000023903806,0.000005423189,0.008847096,0.9659482,0.000042669828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043160353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20231728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95947814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019449633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020178154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9632113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602420943","doi":"","title":"Client Engagement Inside Collaborative Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Table (database); Power (physics); Psychology; Public relations; Law; Business; Political science; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.040701017122308385,"score_gpt":0.3636248303685782,"score_spread":0.3229238132462698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602420943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16420786,0.0013382777,0.0011837165,0.13163097,0.0014498268,0.0003422683,0.0000034253926,0.00008483811,0.6997588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98376095,0.0045404304,0.00021483169,0.0017300984,0.0005379753,0.000008560995,0.0000024110022,0.0000071479967,0.009197621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978427,0.00042749796,0.0002067568,0.000103610306,0.00037186316,0.001047533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999149,0.00013250294,0.00016228284,0.00008470038,0.00038227692,0.00008919807],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028296383,0.00006923664,0.00007870166,0.000073012925,0.0024080246,0.00011153858,0.00017062822,0.00004652658,0.00030244765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045193627,0.000065513195,0.000038448554,0.00060628215,0.00018384033,0.00069372094,0.000013539123,0.0020341496,0.00014354721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008802043,0.00007630889,0.0003240263,3.00966e-7,0.000036203375,0.0000021848577,0.016603101,0.0000056826125,0.000020038011,0.9780397,0.0034370243,0.0014466513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000199527,0.00006885705,0.00023109907,0.0000025569377,0.000009144047,0.00004328088,0.045519087,0.0000010761652,0.000030768002,0.08502106,0.86878866,0.00008489595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002692127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02182315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8930186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011696684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01653183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602899680","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2389410","title":"Data and Diversity in the Canadian Justice Community","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Political science; Geography; Economic Justice; Law","score_opus":0.10637775571388833,"score_gpt":0.3859663544433065,"score_spread":0.2795885987294182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602899680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43058047,0.00028044483,0.00045422476,0.3557442,0.00046654872,0.00014283934,0.000010818177,0.00001217724,0.21230829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969228,0.00035326282,0.000023495617,0.0021699052,0.00016920819,3.3470118e-7,0.0000053531116,0.0000014065233,0.00035421574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981689,0.0009970587,0.00006770846,0.000044854096,0.00014907126,0.00057243946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999303,0.0003563316,0.000047152727,0.00017601345,0.000057636913,0.000059871403],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013189064,0.000028949042,0.000033096596,0.00006044244,0.0046164664,0.0001970724,0.000670814,0.000031564137,0.000025197065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016411177,0.00002328158,0.0000056997187,0.00024853778,0.00009226692,0.0005122495,0.000068022644,0.0028041394,0.000008579296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018549559,0.000021221556,0.010354389,8.5653664e-7,0.0000063449374,1.9365525e-7,0.024552539,5.659328e-7,2.579612e-7,0.9554249,0.0018757785,0.0077610863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012362462,0.000022882245,0.019058289,0.0000024286014,0.00002722051,0.000023295981,0.14844209,0.000034406523,4.2994543e-8,0.20375872,0.6284532,0.00005378858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.794179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7516662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044950575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00597781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604261762","doi":"","title":"\"Uncivil by Too Much Civility\"?: Critiquing Five More Years of Civility Regulation in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Incivility; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.013304375262363983,"score_gpt":0.3136089962000193,"score_spread":0.3003046209376553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604261762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97464633,0.0012445212,0.00027045063,0.017099258,0.00047061057,0.00011687528,0.000008803541,0.000007786489,0.006135351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997901,0.0004128027,0.000039225633,0.00027241337,0.00016876907,0.0000037949628,0.000008245941,0.000006428188,0.0011872689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997641,0.00031421083,0.00033290192,0.00010065886,0.00046521428,0.0011459918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991205,0.00023298654,0.00021472469,0.00011188687,0.00022128962,0.00009865205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040514176,0.000068840985,0.00012041008,0.00007991864,0.00022158599,0.000038469734,0.00017496434,0.000059477115,0.00023933107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012792927,0.000078681514,0.00003461763,0.00054865587,0.00007458034,0.0010136417,0.0000135142955,0.0012663078,0.0000034363438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009776332,0.00061078585,0.29163426,0.000029830797,0.00013277112,0.0000015696929,0.06446436,0.00007110615,0.001166165,0.5400833,0.0334664,0.068241686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087601965,0.00008241011,0.3877725,0.000059731414,0.00005297568,0.000037739446,0.32241914,0.000084968226,0.00030795202,0.09442278,0.19336154,0.00052224257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91384894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98410326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4456605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004197139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023852544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605124053","doi":"10.1002/bsl.592","title":"Australian lawyers' views on competency issues in older adults","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Edith Cowan University","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Affect (linguistics); Population; Legal advice; Psychology; Legal service; Older people; Public relations; Social psychology; Law; Actuarial science; Business; Medicine; Gerontology; Political science","score_opus":0.12062080170516577,"score_gpt":0.4619018960924455,"score_spread":0.3412810943872797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605124053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5090354,0.000047725604,0.0000013647186,0.39412284,0.0008221948,0.0004056176,0.0000036134425,0.00005088382,0.095510386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99349725,0.000021994081,0.00047211658,0.0025915087,0.00015444073,0.00003465562,0.0000024618078,0.0000040576756,0.003221512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845773,0.0001942932,0.0002245006,0.00024601194,0.000519109,0.00035836725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950564,0.000061224266,0.00009909125,0.00018409107,0.000070331254,0.00007962113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012469012,0.000097294054,0.00010110837,0.00006715239,0.001243545,0.00040572122,0.00060660974,0.00006325256,0.0007394201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058812664,0.000066839624,0.000042649568,0.0012364183,0.0011291918,0.0009433835,0.000025585752,0.00028644112,0.000332505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057108223,0.0003648413,0.0021819342,0.000001243864,6.668172e-7,0.0000030495128,0.039625943,0.00002217541,0.000024752988,0.954143,0.0018919007,0.0017348208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048597093,0.0001673066,0.032799788,0.00011324747,0.000013319105,0.0000026195721,0.04702199,0.0000014822264,0.0002520519,0.01808887,0.90077496,0.0002784173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12800306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12049394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9360541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010284991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044533517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9564469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605343510","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2605","title":"Learning the 'How' of the Law: Teaching Procedure and Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Underpinning; Vocational education; Curriculum; Legal education; Subject (documents); Law; Civil law (Civil law); Civil procedure; Economic Justice; Political science; Common law; Mathematics education; Sociology; Commercial law; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Computer science; Psychology; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.01588365844373171,"score_gpt":0.31845635201931716,"score_spread":0.30257269357558547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605343510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03747223,0.00010860846,0.000023834382,0.22677301,0.00070355774,0.00015727423,2.8008472e-7,0.000010974359,0.7347502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869415,0.000024924231,0.0003277621,0.0018794504,0.00050462666,0.000010157941,4.745341e-7,0.000005881782,0.010305195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891424,0.0004559745,0.00014939773,0.00007144057,0.00027086528,0.00013806288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991338,0.00017728853,0.00026983552,0.00009142979,0.00026637732,0.000061230196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011218966,0.00005596867,0.000058694888,0.000019493466,0.0032421064,0.00084324076,0.00022536697,0.00004702787,0.0002265777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008317078,0.000032400985,0.000035971956,0.00013279224,0.0002487835,0.0013096659,0.000026185422,0.0010816412,0.000009019494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010347172,0.000038687267,0.0008472566,0.0000037862833,0.0000083789755,6.923545e-8,0.0095555745,0.000005155644,0.00016581512,0.980803,0.004292458,0.0042787874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010873022,0.000024969235,0.00384242,0.000056719426,0.000028139224,0.00010696808,0.068112314,0.000032047763,0.00007601707,0.055837285,0.87167776,0.00009660301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11054753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048486818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94946927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041594863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066116394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608617439","doi":"10.24908/ss.v12i1.5194","title":"The Problem with Ethics: Difficulties in Constructing Normative Frameworks","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.020655802091644495,"score_gpt":0.3354027644885484,"score_spread":0.3147469623969039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608617439","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3172037,0.00034053443,0.0076126093,0.4014441,0.0012437891,0.0010147856,0.000012177389,0.0003373377,0.27079096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914775,0.00019918237,0.0059509566,0.001733286,0.00018791288,0.000034069715,0.0000036663453,0.0000065542786,0.00040688712],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846196,0.00063563534,0.00018878488,0.00013410347,0.00031520874,0.00026428065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995635,0.003661984,0.00017924553,0.0001316218,0.00035344556,0.000038730548],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040209573,0.00007798964,0.000098486205,0.0000105129175,0.0014138847,0.0003050596,0.00017743472,0.0002015397,0.000031318454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001728046,0.000051930077,0.000038929997,0.00058440777,0.00070618343,0.00033512723,0.00001979285,0.0016394822,0.000012653106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012675154,0.000038448816,0.13348229,0.000017734057,0.00003039182,1.2404391e-7,0.5687092,0.000088442066,0.000008983196,0.27821165,0.006919694,0.012480346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002645416,0.000019403853,0.030857118,0.00004113465,0.0000024967205,9.4783087e-7,0.40466082,0.00011635326,0.000008079338,0.006002712,0.5578314,0.0001949992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024211544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023784393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6742738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103882565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054197555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1609243848","doi":"","title":"Challenging the Existing Paradigm: How to Transnationalize the Legal Curriculum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Curriculum; Vision; Legal education; Presentation (obstetrics); Legal research; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.060860206944277864,"score_gpt":0.3973655496232002,"score_spread":0.33650534267892235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1609243848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022447431,0.0029171123,0.00076724245,0.66473,0.0006897719,0.00042930993,0.000017447144,0.00003780634,0.3301868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9510206,0.0047018724,0.00039752756,0.024310227,0.0011139757,0.00027328418,0.00006674739,0.00001605738,0.018099686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836236,0.0002738883,0.00030694724,0.00018178242,0.00066510466,0.00020991004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986833,0.0005172443,0.00018596377,0.00016645696,0.00039744322,0.000049635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001753178,0.00010387448,0.00011168085,0.000034532,0.0009993853,0.00058461935,0.0005997503,0.000020150874,0.0007814571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005921394,0.00006550044,0.00008844181,0.00046103518,0.00013681517,0.0006948615,0.000028825838,0.0002575443,0.00013723956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.420862e-7,0.00003314423,0.00003178239,0.000019881818,0.000015279129,0.0000011117802,0.0006568396,0.000027319766,0.0000020688276,0.9753092,0.021285154,0.0026172686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000476794,0.0000034650336,0.00028062466,0.00014816619,0.000016986363,0.0000061959067,0.00036130362,0.000037587546,0.0000022377865,0.010762131,0.98824,0.00009359051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009397159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066029136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012539951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019902215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99719936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1610584657","doi":"","title":"Back to Where We Started? The Expansion of the Saskatchewan Justice Alternative Measures Guidelines as an Opportunity to Explore Program Delivery Issues","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law","score_opus":0.07204855626718464,"score_gpt":0.2989265851503175,"score_spread":0.22687802888313285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1610584657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88744897,0.00007918245,0.0005122831,0.1031232,0.00039674633,0.001947188,0.00022674543,0.00017960317,0.00608608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91328865,0.0004942774,0.020299358,0.0011064732,0.00013818366,3.7903703e-7,0.000051978728,0.00003490645,0.064585805],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600637,0.0011003835,0.0004174039,0.0007107174,0.001155755,0.00060937396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948977,0.00038809158,0.00080794975,0.0011170212,0.0018247418,0.0009644694],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006453969,0.0004145194,0.0006206745,0.0005340172,0.0019782244,0.00010885188,0.0032418636,0.00034154818,0.006468008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001606181,0.00043428454,0.00038800586,0.0026378639,0.0016089188,0.0054767784,0.0010306841,0.00064955844,0.00019286857],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005664603,0.0006235427,0.0011980282,0.00013041135,0.00026872792,0.00002098095,0.933231,0.00028519842,0.001541704,0.00038370036,0.043708052,0.018042183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006119736,0.00031638838,0.0010146329,0.00023625742,0.0002578837,0.00000170028,0.7998738,0.00004799179,0.0007976234,0.00037722112,0.19608304,0.00038146615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36539075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12544982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23994093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025769213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058332537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1619378921","doi":"","title":"Where's Omar? Where Is Justice?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.21323367412326663,"score_gpt":0.4006327016567138,"score_spread":0.18739902753344714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1619378921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019780772,0.00006095094,0.000108606466,0.0090105375,0.00054544985,0.0005869385,0.000014744369,0.00010305168,0.96978897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25755987,0.0006143686,0.00096946093,0.00015990123,0.00017571157,5.519296e-7,0.0000053453637,0.000016706224,0.7404981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592465,0.001722455,0.00017322633,0.0005880392,0.0008831525,0.0007084538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969138,0.00032357732,0.0001798868,0.00061478344,0.0014266818,0.00054130086],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016372454,0.00017375096,0.00021160403,0.000637299,0.0057741394,0.0005368439,0.002419837,0.00029857646,0.00023343951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019856804,0.00022234072,0.000109541805,0.0028187523,0.0011096424,0.0042097187,0.00045457206,0.0011327949,0.00044329188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022694953,0.0002561544,0.00358193,0.000027701899,0.00007523598,0.00031318527,0.022652484,5.320179e-7,0.00012907233,0.9373061,0.034874875,0.0005557552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005498671,0.000092221846,0.002501136,0.000048263402,0.00008198429,0.0000051318298,0.08978955,0.000010103293,0.00016732367,0.00023609851,0.90626436,0.0002539683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07855246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014942138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011063276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003558679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99552023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1634339657","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1166","title":"Searching for the Constitutional Core of Access to Justice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Justiciability; Law; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.3668446990512506,"score_gpt":0.5075296711308575,"score_spread":0.14068497207960684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1634339657","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062119396,0.02241732,0.012676372,0.5856071,0.0018849177,0.0036316686,0.000077652316,0.0000642057,0.37301958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8801801,0.040609457,0.004116456,0.07046532,0.00096003193,0.00038948352,0.000034109922,0.000012540268,0.0032325042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918455,0.000088902765,0.00021080607,0.000094948904,0.00028815542,0.00013265708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980312,0.0010783963,0.00009558321,0.00015307081,0.0005799467,0.00006182775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001305138,0.000047741916,0.00011535305,0.00001850942,0.0010784265,0.000047249225,0.00035504135,0.0000209148,0.00057618076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002957245,0.00003490838,0.000054267563,0.0004254333,0.0005824576,0.00041684727,0.000031625055,0.00012253705,0.000041109903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029258083,0.000020689193,0.00006399438,0.00023235579,0.000009445676,1.8344154e-7,0.00076539593,0.0000073246824,0.0000064997016,0.9247241,0.07293388,0.0012331851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004504902,0.000006850041,0.00013784872,0.00027156118,0.00006313479,0.000002822126,0.0001668666,0.0000057409356,0.0000078617895,0.0009451807,0.9983004,0.00004672404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017991149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076831813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92536646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003500062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001129932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8294494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W165177754","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1193","title":"Law Student, Heal Thyself: The Role and Responsibility of Clinical Education Programs in Promoting Self-Care","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Context (archaeology); Legal profession; Mental health; Psychology; Addiction; Political science; Medical education; Nursing; Public relations; Medicine; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.07293553762130897,"score_gpt":0.4943147035579832,"score_spread":0.42137916593667424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W165177754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92085624,0.00007919902,7.8482003e-7,0.037921384,0.00018150489,0.00015701509,6.713842e-7,0.000005181359,0.040798027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965857,0.000036247835,0.00016375308,0.0014884054,0.0016891087,0.0000028174159,5.839401e-7,0.000003259043,0.000030073374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980852,0.0009949704,0.00050271116,0.00007314987,0.00022940384,0.000114559356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873525,0.0002968098,0.00047771394,0.000055235036,0.0003720971,0.000062878156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004139941,0.00004735445,0.00016565906,0.000043433625,0.00048910495,0.00013003894,0.000110342626,0.000081617356,0.000003164063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006853317,0.00003503419,0.000048292768,0.00020847378,0.00035949834,0.00036037507,0.000022082973,0.00034686533,3.4406875e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020878373,0.00027146807,0.038155336,0.000012683257,0.000010158129,5.8440612e-8,0.2079012,3.0628826e-8,0.0000046148966,0.7289382,0.000022472379,0.02466286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007110248,0.0003123259,0.29072317,0.000048441925,0.000047946123,0.0000047060153,0.174181,0.000005201401,0.000010541648,0.05652651,0.47731367,0.000115485156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0128631145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007262924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67241174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054231423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014547308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99371034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1654198160","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00393.x","title":"<i>Lives of Lawyers Revisited: Transformation and Resilience in the Organization of Practice</i> . By Michael J. Kelly. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2007. Pp. 414. $159.95 cloth; $24.95 paper.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; General partnership; Queen (butterfly); Citation; Practice of law; Law; Legal profession; Political science","score_opus":0.0120746073953751,"score_gpt":0.294260964231898,"score_spread":0.28218635683652293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1654198160","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01130345,0.76459765,0.00016666926,0.14548469,0.00015589134,0.0026766541,0.00013494145,0.000060875926,0.075419195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08417587,0.9072618,0.0010078296,0.007398954,0.000023693241,0.0000011402902,0.00004556532,0.000005192466,0.00007995563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985302,0.00048195972,0.00039817873,0.0001450451,0.00031986058,0.00012474072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984933,0.0003278728,0.0005599014,0.00019423878,0.00038907677,0.00003557347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015871627,0.000089160865,0.00023684761,0.0000022509166,0.00022959437,0.000025968979,0.0002515019,0.000074374424,0.00007028116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043641642,0.00007917078,0.000068041605,0.0010049207,0.00034404217,0.0013615682,0.000010457114,0.00020566263,0.0000016957083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039268896,0.0010299173,0.00089385617,0.003359186,0.00009091854,7.643972e-7,0.24285206,0.0000128477095,0.0046904255,0.30921194,0.42901844,0.008800367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016772673,0.0000379892,0.00032124878,0.00058314874,0.00011884217,0.0000014151859,0.026733296,0.0000066800726,0.00015330574,0.00016029521,0.9716261,0.00008994699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001983099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002707088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54260767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002502994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020677551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32284907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1661029240","doi":"","title":"Rape Shield Laws: Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Witness; Sexual assault; Legislation; Notice; Political science; Common law; Admissible evidence; Supreme court; Parliament; Sexual history; Criminology; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Politics","score_opus":0.01173766262400714,"score_gpt":0.30522863438993614,"score_spread":0.293490971765929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1661029240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17268534,0.0009139886,0.0001376102,0.26517838,0.0009058453,0.00010762294,0.0000023471712,0.000034632845,0.5600342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91815794,0.0022283387,0.000029176614,0.0023864321,0.00066010817,0.000002203538,0.0000018368806,0.0000056705458,0.0765283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982013,0.0001343738,0.00015001823,0.00007727351,0.00030857025,0.0011284433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995912,0.00009331715,0.00006549454,0.000073942625,0.000086865446,0.00008921885],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014176845,0.000053648477,0.000057745136,0.00003478393,0.00083669537,0.00014113085,0.00020838401,0.000041137846,0.0056005847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020308654,0.000051780782,0.000028111095,0.00036343475,0.000042696898,0.0004540957,0.0000030382735,0.0016956184,0.00009118593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000140292605,0.0000410568,0.0007894925,5.7460335e-7,0.000043077525,0.0000020146517,0.0028001557,0.000009942149,0.000006727258,0.85773647,0.024230162,0.114326276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009776048,0.000018188712,0.00016651218,0.0000021561223,0.000007334248,0.000028011886,0.015317034,0.0000018718496,0.0000036309998,0.04983913,0.9344465,0.00007187151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8245623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98792833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91021633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011989517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04495281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99530846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1661050030","doi":"","title":"Positivist Legal Ethics Theory and the Law Governing Lawyers: A Few Puzzles Worth Solving","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hofstra law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal ethics; Law; Legal positivism; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Legal profession; Sociology; Legal realism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04481532221732027,"score_gpt":0.3895861595395608,"score_spread":0.3447708373222405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1661050030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043881216,0.022409009,0.00052289234,0.22081272,0.00030835037,0.00045851056,0.0000053311032,0.00007569995,0.7549687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9094683,0.01994056,0.00045734865,0.067681335,0.0004017319,0.000044289718,0.000009240187,0.000014855018,0.0019823567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966429,0.002345133,0.0002688944,0.00018132933,0.00034494206,0.00021681825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957723,0.003544258,0.00021731552,0.00022337493,0.00016189534,0.000080866484],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010369403,0.00010850067,0.00021824692,0.000010694687,0.0016370876,0.00059765525,0.00021670182,0.00007692375,0.00025826978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036917378,0.00007592071,0.000073122384,0.00028229487,0.0010715435,0.0007486405,0.00003725775,0.00075360294,0.00007591191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006454762,0.000013915169,0.000013487298,0.00019889827,0.000013906402,5.0346665e-7,0.0036305815,1.4515977e-7,0.0000017522779,0.9905635,0.0011091379,0.0044476786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014252355,0.0000066736648,0.000060423445,0.0008486107,0.000074688694,0.000005796632,0.0009984458,0.0000025437773,0.0000027099463,0.011453126,0.9862957,0.000108746266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009883871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014389563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9851866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003550663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029704513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1665552844","doi":"","title":"Cinderella at the Ball: Legislative Intent in Canadian Courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislative history; Parliament; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law; Legislative intent; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.1179023299821157,"score_gpt":0.3909925532770402,"score_spread":0.2730902232949245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1665552844","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019889502,0.028497528,5.703271e-7,0.527252,0.0010131596,0.0007883105,0.00004325113,0.000009148311,0.44040707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7037407,0.023170162,0.000057926627,0.24111368,0.000352976,0.00018639467,0.00016901117,0.000025033205,0.031184128],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984044,0.00039770931,0.000259441,0.00017804466,0.00023908753,0.0005213525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981195,0.00010190998,0.00008627744,0.00024201855,0.00017468128,0.0012756115],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018569333,0.00010226307,0.00015108807,0.00014065077,0.00045828105,0.00009459731,0.00029441447,0.00005141315,0.0049085254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000723956,0.00008523286,0.00003924794,0.00066532334,0.0001677076,0.00032790384,0.000014491349,0.00029057497,0.0008169315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010117765,0.000008090777,0.0130889155,0.000018880923,0.00001301107,0.000017375283,0.008672234,0.0000019745235,9.954191e-8,0.010143514,0.96095675,0.0070781494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007386121,0.000007477631,0.0011100167,0.00021871967,0.000017190985,0.0000041052626,0.005470663,0.000002873807,3.3285448e-7,0.00024348116,0.99274063,0.00011064995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99902207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7017517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004929937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016071603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1682106982","doi":"10.29173/alr2672","title":"Imperfect Duty: Lawyers’ Obligation to Foster Access to Justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Imperfect; Economic Justice; Duty; Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.09521076546473202,"score_gpt":0.4533340618716132,"score_spread":0.3581232964068812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1682106982","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008327586,0.0020815963,0.00005695508,0.57600385,0.0007898494,0.00051988126,0.0000022868953,0.000022027029,0.4196908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14058152,0.007699466,0.0010147423,0.82728523,0.0007279722,0.00028934382,0.000054607077,0.000026444435,0.022320706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862796,0.0003301726,0.0002800665,0.0002591922,0.00027323028,0.00022938891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998194,0.0007003913,0.000086086664,0.00032034065,0.0004830073,0.00021617585],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007340859,0.00009430153,0.00018152218,0.000033276232,0.00046844472,0.0004741813,0.00029216497,0.000048410075,0.0037861108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049857646,0.000091769645,0.000061149796,0.0016644938,0.00003134005,0.0010902382,0.00008843497,0.00014742497,0.002379418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027276697,0.000057799418,0.0001143782,0.00037286576,0.000018219067,0.0000020393545,0.004849487,0.0000012878385,0.000084863284,0.5366929,0.4453557,0.012447719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003958942,0.000010377554,0.00015878686,0.00051333057,0.000105654326,0.0000025314823,0.00027036518,3.5125797e-7,0.00013550736,0.00026475315,0.9983672,0.00013153955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01252538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07596429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55301154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008676538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057000655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99839735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W16877511","doi":"10.1529/biophysj.106.088716","title":"Taking precedents seriously: The influence of stare decisis on judicial decision-making.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biophysical Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Public Health Service; University of Toronto; General Electric","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.030510275189534617,"score_gpt":0.3969540149379223,"score_spread":0.3664437397483877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W16877511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711443,0.000011062139,0.00016490908,0.020524321,0.00040600664,0.00009131318,0.0000039001247,0.000013738117,0.0076404586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959071,0.00004190157,0.0009271511,0.0015672254,0.0014855509,0.00000300438,2.923114e-7,0.000006426532,0.00006130921],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845713,0.00016380452,0.0003183982,0.000108233704,0.0007532893,0.00019913797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797934,0.0009662576,0.000435329,0.0001427165,0.00039124402,0.000085138374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005758287,0.00007623709,0.00010797308,0.000080163685,0.0009317438,0.00026329982,0.00042680622,0.00005553003,0.00051441765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031318688,0.000053079806,0.00008226766,0.00060059596,0.00018616841,0.00063117204,0.000031788182,0.00053510454,0.00011383461],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038516533,0.0011141704,0.0041646403,0.000004892014,0.00011328971,0.000009428425,0.044569284,0.005301974,0.007927121,0.1141026,0.015962603,0.8063448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009246327,0.0003833549,0.44565535,0.0007718372,0.00011748461,0.00003819171,0.01357865,0.00032959422,0.001521213,0.020031592,0.51603216,0.0006159608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027025564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031815268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80572885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012577738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051086105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7166315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1696780779","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1190","title":"Framing Supervisory Relationships in Clinical Law: The Role of Critical Pedagogy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Political science; Law; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.15555622381080705,"score_gpt":0.4989572005660606,"score_spread":0.3434009767552535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1696780779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3446925,0.00017286303,0.000057113022,0.2889985,0.00039495958,0.00006359465,0.0000023365872,0.000005660704,0.36561248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99398553,0.000038495054,0.00012243817,0.0033742231,0.0023937735,6.568075e-7,2.553985e-7,0.000003347083,0.000081277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811095,0.001048431,0.00047644327,0.000045665016,0.00019941719,0.00011909514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976379,0.0018246908,0.00019852242,0.00004573247,0.00023689859,0.00005625244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038062786,0.000037819584,0.00013889502,0.000059234764,0.0006376556,0.00006878335,0.00011961804,0.000116484436,0.000032137505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037458974,0.000029605506,0.00006458386,0.00017226096,0.00075560046,0.00040030005,0.000014600613,0.0006499711,0.0000025932293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005888133,0.00007058351,0.003246781,0.0000033005742,0.0000047057883,1.5886629e-7,0.04163381,2.5209422e-7,0.000008624107,0.95259696,0.00011059075,0.0023183161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000197589,0.00004172082,0.030698277,0.000009743603,0.000019022396,0.000002998067,0.031942617,0.000009825155,0.0000056802924,0.2926467,0.6443749,0.000050935698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0147218425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075938697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6599503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027784265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067529996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99183923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W170816581","doi":"10.29173/alr33","title":"The Future of Law School: Three Visions and a Prediction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Polity; Legal profession; Law; Variety (cybernetics); Scholarship; Political science; Legal education; Practice of law; Focus (optics); Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Politics","score_opus":0.024358472118028687,"score_gpt":0.3538486937060262,"score_spread":0.3294902215879975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W170816581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040109485,0.03506389,0.00002388587,0.2772212,0.00064195436,0.00039649545,0.0000022030817,0.000017108921,0.68623215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7896911,0.17233367,0.00037240068,0.030965863,0.0013766283,0.000110507295,0.000017321729,0.000017251143,0.0051152683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930274,0.00016858293,0.00019648086,0.00008833224,0.00015074229,0.000093120245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998798,0.0006772463,0.000120753466,0.0002009509,0.00013754418,0.000065510816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009827453,0.00004643128,0.00009655507,0.000006913495,0.00076809456,0.00007698249,0.00012652941,0.00003820324,0.0002512285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087027584,0.00003012177,0.000031878833,0.00022515398,0.00021085575,0.000349179,0.000016918431,0.00014225845,0.000052865496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.006143e-7,0.000010289115,0.00020581143,0.000048644786,0.000005970982,7.8273885e-9,0.0002732689,2.4778535e-8,0.0000011497165,0.9774822,0.009426189,0.012545738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034666347,0.000011066622,0.00054705905,0.00020650553,0.000031154395,6.8126127e-7,0.00008636874,0.0000030739723,8.857833e-7,0.007474813,0.99157107,0.000032666303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02212544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13082936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9821449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011402829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010602775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W171191924","doi":"10.29173/alr40","title":"Are Clinics a Magic Bullet?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Boston College","keywords":"Legal education; Magic bullet; Experiential education; MAGIC (telescope); Experiential learning; Law; Legal psychology; Legal realism; Legal profession; Legal practice; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.061434037296869026,"score_gpt":0.41802818302096556,"score_spread":0.35659414572409653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W171191924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001375939,0.005493989,0.00001539887,0.26659203,0.0004468252,0.00020237114,5.803216e-7,0.00002198075,0.7270892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27364048,0.06442992,0.0008923956,0.5440063,0.0014581417,0.00010135548,0.000027543643,0.00003551701,0.11540833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989216,0.0003588309,0.0002539356,0.00013932724,0.00017044232,0.0001558773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983272,0.0009020949,0.00027118064,0.00025407347,0.00015814402,0.00008734011],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001198143,0.00006485564,0.00016418855,0.0000127319545,0.00030656086,0.00008897189,0.00019819803,0.000046923982,0.003759262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052046115,0.00005737721,0.00006381078,0.00037077224,0.00010845886,0.00026955188,0.000015836153,0.0001858348,0.0039376197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.713068e-7,0.000028592627,0.00030532773,0.000105492654,0.0000046096675,1.4166373e-7,0.0002803023,3.199037e-8,9.309581e-8,0.8971342,0.096087,0.006053847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003951756,0.000005108209,0.00014576736,0.0003487529,0.000030182955,8.6042036e-7,0.00007123815,0.000001191015,2.6142376e-7,0.0019456507,0.99733067,0.00008080853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014883557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023220008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9012437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023266814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013397426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99715143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17120724","doi":"","title":"Innovation in Legal Studies Education: An Integrated Case Study Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socratic method; Legal research; Legal education; Popularity; Empirical legal studies; Legal writing; Meaning (existential); Jury; Curriculum; Common law; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.20105023050388893,"score_gpt":0.5029591158194794,"score_spread":0.30190888531559046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17120724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87178385,0.00007395122,0.00011745242,0.0043824012,0.000997439,0.00047464127,5.1317437e-7,0.00006969531,0.122100055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98887634,0.0000056680915,0.0028527814,0.0008824014,0.00046384765,0.00014810354,0.000014123559,0.000006181199,0.006750575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865305,0.00044446051,0.00034554602,0.00014391149,0.00020439723,0.00020864872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988515,0.000109476474,0.00011063985,0.00015973565,0.0007044564,0.00006418762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002524171,0.00008081247,0.0000988181,0.00036544265,0.00043079146,0.00017012667,0.00009945859,0.000050465347,0.0002581733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012963244,0.00007153978,0.000009236443,0.0034693107,0.00008644902,0.0034416597,0.00001588228,0.00026411575,0.00002937586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006026217,0.0043453183,0.11772322,0.0000046767905,0.0000229486,0.0000051293473,0.30507675,0.0000030530744,0.000004331601,0.5399463,0.0059513953,0.026910806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111275476,0.00002543789,0.006132662,0.0000021137448,0.000007992369,0.00003495767,0.81918025,0.0000077320365,0.0000036208048,0.00013245108,0.17426977,0.00009173007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055675264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018658767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5398139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021750573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013376101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1719239166","doi":"","title":"Honouring Social Justice: Honouring Dianne Martin","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Champion; Economic Justice; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Portrait; Criminology; History","score_opus":0.06489647806253972,"score_gpt":0.3790788858516241,"score_spread":0.31418240778908435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1719239166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009988762,0.00009441875,0.000077373224,0.040688694,0.0021547666,0.00022491638,0.000009696363,0.00021340234,0.9564369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029416436,0.00030377795,0.00043974436,0.0018954084,0.008653769,0.000023318025,0.000055061213,0.0000381667,0.9856491],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982636,0.00012398633,0.00036914353,0.00030069725,0.00051906507,0.00042353358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987628,0.0002896193,0.0003365496,0.00017399783,0.00029358178,0.00014346953],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005881515,0.00020012994,0.00023643702,0.0002153237,0.00241369,0.00032881205,0.00034225077,0.00042498246,0.00450631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065484695,0.00022480667,0.00012749709,0.00029065294,0.00025814222,0.0006496882,0.000056187266,0.0009884472,0.001493422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028441675,0.000031436695,0.000012682018,0.000023784136,0.000022938071,0.0000062902245,0.012815608,7.835344e-7,0.0000011467611,0.2551421,0.7299921,0.0019482832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009238602,0.0000060097605,0.00009706535,0.000022717764,0.00006994379,0.0000021954713,0.0024137276,0.0000021584951,0.0000043822656,0.0023537937,0.99464756,0.0002880537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00104744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011474837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26465547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057897845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005230513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1733047441","doi":"10.7748/nr2008.10.16.1.93.c6756","title":"‘Personal pride in developing the profession’","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nurse Researcher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Nursing; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.2619045280120819,"score_gpt":0.5194327834254208,"score_spread":0.25752825541333885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1733047441","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3004861,0.00005247894,0.000019099041,0.48736992,0.00019998282,0.00022843319,5.0725805e-7,0.000021415013,0.21162206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95046204,0.000087967936,0.00035505524,0.0013881153,0.00021064474,0.000053175365,0.0000017543431,0.0000049443834,0.04743629],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867046,0.0004646102,0.00009496147,0.00008944365,0.0004456407,0.00023485818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929583,0.00038399932,0.000025832433,0.000082209415,0.00016424412,0.000047863647],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001672933,0.00003294055,0.00003798679,0.00007317434,0.0007927709,0.00005104913,0.00017971173,0.00004870244,0.0010030346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001994585,0.000022796054,0.000013738957,0.0008721288,0.00029598898,0.0003308659,0.000014160778,0.00048029856,0.00022632554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034329554,0.00018574191,0.056665733,0.000007882448,0.00001104976,0.000018923702,0.36851168,8.265229e-7,0.00010571246,0.35886404,0.19745202,0.018142046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008693707,0.000003237529,0.10124007,0.00001413698,4.631567e-7,0.0000016038828,0.027738292,0.000012540148,0.000033680124,0.0007649249,0.8700601,0.00004402671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041158777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022976075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6726081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017798903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028565302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1739854090","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1195","title":"Pushing the Boundaries of Clinical Law: Exploring How Student and Community Legal Clinics Engage with International Human Rights Practice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Compliance (psychology); Political science; International human rights law; Law; International law; Government (linguistics); International community; Legal research; Public relations; Psychology","score_opus":0.2086279458538344,"score_gpt":0.5176745390674697,"score_spread":0.30904659321363537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1739854090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7594127,0.000014832449,0.000043708962,0.13877855,0.0005660336,0.00006211383,0.0000025627812,0.000006012212,0.10111345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936702,0.000042552187,0.0002671391,0.0029844176,0.0028751781,0.0000014951889,8.0754893e-7,0.000004369475,0.00015381406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968124,0.0021874737,0.00043073922,0.000053540425,0.0004090912,0.00010676082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624044,0.0021863854,0.0008575759,0.000072843904,0.0005755773,0.00006720491],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008497955,0.00006212956,0.0001920982,0.000043749056,0.005011989,0.001014664,0.00023509862,0.000063590276,0.0000060343723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019993281,0.00004207812,0.000052112722,0.00009617059,0.0014262181,0.0020120426,0.000053259777,0.0013151336,2.5103031e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035143414,0.00015006779,0.0006194279,0.0000037264736,0.000073805284,6.77365e-7,0.10176979,1.7945356e-7,0.0000031120453,0.8963123,0.0002342506,0.000797514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004256629,0.00015629656,0.0061307563,0.000015169914,0.000049147282,0.000008383181,0.05060976,7.109974e-7,0.0000042953457,0.01024275,0.9323047,0.000052398642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038591836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018819656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93207043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036794485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004256747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1740798251","doi":"","title":"Lawyers Gone Bad: Money Sex and Madness in Canada's Legal Profession (Philip Slayton)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03728442380868719,"score_gpt":0.35877167323164394,"score_spread":0.32148724942295676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1740798251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09304176,0.09508246,0.0000045313195,0.07104802,0.0016016772,0.0015475269,0.00004286604,0.0000474987,0.73758364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91347915,0.082573235,0.000022581675,0.0031964811,0.000086260276,0.00003394443,0.000027713604,0.000007414811,0.0005732227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998646,0.00016648475,0.0004227405,0.00019018297,0.000343387,0.0002311989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993075,0.00006934163,0.00021127006,0.0001573755,0.000120817276,0.00013367526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008548428,0.00011487875,0.000285065,0.000029688328,0.00042827943,0.000023239592,0.00012566481,0.00004468503,0.00009613134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000796827,0.00008928783,0.000027814074,0.00035076847,0.0002961927,0.0005870239,0.00004094357,0.0002998415,0.0000042062684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067115598,0.00007630276,0.0012426091,0.001332973,0.00000724301,0.0000023537084,0.0017571318,5.7991695e-8,0.00000456305,0.97585326,0.0024655776,0.01725124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017475462,0.000010345113,0.0010973442,0.0015535939,0.0000134995535,0.0000062168574,0.0008371855,0.000002031433,0.000024592877,0.00024307358,0.9959167,0.000120637065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8832024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88437593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9934511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002449566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015031922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36410522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1741390103","doi":"","title":"Detecting Doctrines: The Case Method and the Detective Story","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Analogy; CLARITY; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Doctrine; Consistency (knowledge bases); Legal writing; Memorization; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Constructive; Legal doctrine; Law; Sociology; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10030104389226185,"score_gpt":0.41317236159242365,"score_spread":0.3128713177001618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1741390103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057316955,0.00012405006,0.014958477,0.05592752,0.00055531075,0.00043073282,5.783104e-7,0.00007886068,0.8706075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924866,0.000011347327,0.0028765618,0.0015328092,0.00012296495,0.000030266385,3.3073146e-8,0.0000026164362,0.0029368068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874634,0.00092240406,0.000077543824,0.00008096703,0.000075158314,0.00009761308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717486,0.002497543,0.00006734624,0.00011152659,0.00012023994,0.00002846824],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003763688,0.000038445567,0.000042558964,0.000025639578,0.0017502018,0.00009594153,0.00009775372,0.000027111759,0.0004662246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028336616,0.000018808005,0.000019400664,0.0003241051,0.00029801423,0.0002951544,0.000021422235,0.00027444688,0.000016361046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018154153,0.0000105303725,0.000101773825,8.6837207e-7,0.000016759706,0.0000057950765,0.25937334,2.1769868e-7,0.000007503875,0.6624682,0.0004385922,0.077558264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041272305,0.000017513334,0.000952608,0.0000021545532,0.000053811174,0.00020566885,0.593904,0.00010717219,0.0003561126,0.031335533,0.37253323,0.00011944262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048448764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019731697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93516964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023110999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016096854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174246518","doi":"10.29173/alr341","title":"Professional Competence Peer Review and Quality Assurance in England and Wales and in Scotland","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Quality assurance; Peer review; New england; Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Public relations; Law; Psychology; Medicine; Geography; Computer science; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09670666897402098,"score_gpt":0.4308875301133895,"score_spread":0.3341808611393685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174246518","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22140129,0.47442952,4.608949e-7,0.2786854,0.00012776551,0.00093182817,0.000004771938,0.000008011495,0.024410944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44716707,0.541167,0.00011905076,0.009225348,0.000026426738,0.0000463715,0.000008580481,0.0000035064613,0.002236636],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985924,0.0005336816,0.00033047498,0.00019535735,0.00021590013,0.00013222477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984849,0.0010947819,0.00011627219,0.000102302634,0.00013423843,0.00006748625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020871174,0.00007974087,0.0002912672,0.000021350834,0.00021585463,0.000028748194,0.00006812028,0.000040763953,0.000110447225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003317889,0.0000648903,0.000011624594,0.00034324967,0.0002688729,0.00048043576,0.000026599339,0.00021465195,0.0000068176696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017415561,0.00019462705,0.6836034,0.013262773,0.00001318051,0.000006366044,0.016272342,4.1468123e-8,0.0000049677487,0.26832348,0.008116758,0.01018463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018035481,0.000004511637,0.12986422,0.005180454,0.000010957529,0.0000103085285,0.000059408714,4.079731e-7,2.4871167e-7,0.00014886682,0.8644497,0.00009058813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0347725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20730312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8563329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000160299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019700764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.971655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174795138","doi":"10.29173/alr337","title":"Racism and Legal Culture: Is there Room for Diversity in the Legal Profession?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Legal culture; Racism; Legal profession; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07761822857644092,"score_gpt":0.3979800009522478,"score_spread":0.3203617723758069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174795138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017082306,0.029943176,0.000011262899,0.59314436,0.00044890016,0.0018841127,0.000007884971,0.000018026662,0.35745996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8866616,0.029479472,0.00014731113,0.05167761,0.0001725119,0.00010255125,0.0000124387325,0.000005739259,0.031740762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911517,0.0002684584,0.00015647833,0.00013637917,0.00018218128,0.00014132904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991945,0.00043616115,0.00009137246,0.00014559698,0.00009421261,0.000038143207],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007459154,0.000068955356,0.000126936,0.000010871172,0.0014942333,0.00006728138,0.0002205453,0.00005200972,0.00028218777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054942473,0.000043634354,0.00004781839,0.0003259039,0.00011678518,0.00075935276,0.000043592758,0.0002055185,0.00003661851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036592528,0.0000662781,0.0013363354,0.00011511235,0.000007893147,0.000001652651,0.021153932,1.2371072e-8,5.085633e-7,0.8395896,0.13612309,0.0016019222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010330934,0.000010419193,0.0012402154,0.00016071285,0.0000243488,0.0000072507523,0.001232477,5.7448494e-7,0.0000012860813,0.00055045955,0.9966009,0.0000680379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05066129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032777432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8695793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002280452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019076638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1749298535","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316337875","title":"Fighting Fair: Legal Ethics for an Adversarial Age","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Legal ethics; Cognitive reframing; Law; Legal profession; Honor; Political science; Settlement (finance); Legal realism; Analogy; Economic Justice; Ethical dilemma; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2869393197559734,"score_gpt":0.4873242243172676,"score_spread":0.20038490456129415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1749298535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000015546559,0.000017914765,0.00070037524,0.034046434,0.003303621,0.00045398992,0.000044940778,0.00015452436,0.96127665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004518506,0.0000107207525,0.0039199125,0.0035460687,0.005874006,0.000032425793,0.0005139912,0.000025251667,0.98562574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843985,0.00020983964,0.00027352088,0.00025637064,0.0005739356,0.00024646267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972421,0.0011351026,0.00024598357,0.00020714349,0.0009947487,0.00017494164],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003209984,0.00013674906,0.0001719484,0.00010651538,0.0009247286,0.00057399273,0.0003345818,0.00075322343,0.0012552142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005571423,0.00013705614,0.00008454995,0.00013801281,0.00018001607,0.0011755701,0.000025639372,0.0012846382,0.0001572845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000592146,0.000015223538,2.6493635e-7,0.000007021912,0.000009529523,5.10344e-7,0.011920471,5.8908137e-7,4.5472532e-7,0.5184077,0.46895504,0.0006772789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016071508,0.000041625128,4.7410234e-7,0.000014041422,0.000035946123,3.7640405e-7,0.0045313914,0.000008282177,7.711805e-7,0.04443166,0.950583,0.00019172809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006555962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03165251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48162794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041289825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020246988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1761713647","doi":"","title":"Custody, Control, and Confusion: Legal, Historical, and Territorial Aspects of Court Records in Ontario","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archivaria","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Locale (computer software); Legislation; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Confusion; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Humanities; Ethnology; History; Archaeology; Art","score_opus":0.019600650225916994,"score_gpt":0.3040535594768348,"score_spread":0.2844529092509178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1761713647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4484541,0.000019555497,0.000053490534,0.057050854,0.0058752224,0.00023707916,0.000004248965,0.000020890544,0.48828456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964038,0.000014484567,0.0009303858,0.00028772396,0.00053203845,0.000007141607,0.0000022716054,0.000003988436,0.0018181452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927926,0.00010550245,0.00019575353,0.00013783755,0.00015364394,0.0001279873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921983,0.0004263232,0.00009753189,0.00010395428,0.0000655803,0.00008674762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005926112,0.0000580441,0.00012672122,0.000085937274,0.00019230323,0.00008044778,0.000084649975,0.00006493767,0.00029334813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006986694,0.00005772388,0.0000135489245,0.00012493438,0.000174469,0.00032919768,0.00002093433,0.0005032127,0.0000028450036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004405281,0.00008570878,0.018879803,0.000002659962,0.0000062267272,0.000002130246,0.012414898,9.2695316e-8,0.0022442269,0.95792884,0.006913367,0.0014779692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052227755,0.00004008384,0.06191272,0.000005630304,0.000009279466,0.0000030179242,0.00032302123,0.000008898339,0.000008719225,0.026418021,0.91067815,0.000070192014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7402743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7218648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93151087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009854662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012151534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32119563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W176249346","doi":"","title":"Enhancing Access to Justice in Nigeria with Judicial Case Management: An Evolving Norm in Common Law Countries","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summons; Economic Justice; Obligation; Law; Civil procedure; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.01843144701148711,"score_gpt":0.37411300223831656,"score_spread":0.3556815552268294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W176249346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9260706,0.00016631724,0.0009434958,0.02765255,0.00031872312,0.0003156245,8.960082e-7,0.000029501593,0.044502325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611676,0.00024662938,0.00020189339,0.0028437753,0.0003344889,0.0000069998405,0.0000015726819,0.000007447592,0.0002404283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979046,0.00020287062,0.00029809272,0.00015331146,0.00029194806,0.0011491681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994317,0.00009184408,0.00013551896,0.00010199481,0.00014491551,0.000094008035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003037227,0.00009354096,0.00012812395,0.00027482476,0.00079196016,0.00068713294,0.00028333563,0.000050620292,0.00007356262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010232589,0.000092537644,0.000014399452,0.0010590024,0.000047767993,0.002732518,0.000015723706,0.0013427283,0.000010922872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118080265,0.0001713538,0.0038714733,0.000006359599,0.000016244012,0.00020239325,0.025351373,0.0001252071,0.000022884004,0.9647905,0.00009397427,0.0052301465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026261196,0.0011361305,0.020869324,0.00034039887,0.00016130616,0.0015931919,0.4813078,0.00007791107,0.00014717148,0.44522706,0.04544647,0.0010671138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013994511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.855309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8413145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014309279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024750317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W176882265","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Technology on Courts and Judicial Ethics: An Overview","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Competence (human resources); Political science; Judicial independence; Transparency (behavior); Law; Diligence; Public relations; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08767505871447571,"score_gpt":0.45845316312417755,"score_spread":0.3707781044097018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W176882265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88265306,0.0075180097,0.000046168436,0.1029791,0.00024269185,0.000111030786,0.0000013030112,0.000023741848,0.006424895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9383078,0.06090727,0.000018855324,0.00016827033,0.0002180476,0.0000016097483,3.743302e-7,0.000004210057,0.00037351192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986863,0.00024147503,0.00015445644,0.00006789122,0.00022943688,0.00062039745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991821,0.00027008905,0.0001761419,0.00009214336,0.00023285075,0.00004666421],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032030798,0.000051350522,0.00007497038,0.00009666581,0.0017006337,0.000047216567,0.00017574544,0.0001037214,0.000036201433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001255583,0.000034440334,0.00003808023,0.00030337725,0.0003646851,0.00027411556,0.000008273933,0.002706303,0.0000056013596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016785452,0.00004900011,0.0010445447,3.5781426e-7,0.000031585507,4.1080148e-7,0.0039518666,0.000002591463,0.000029257173,0.9817206,0.00026937708,0.012883608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021571295,0.0006010969,0.0054673054,0.0000110013425,0.000012139746,0.00017634608,0.012697867,0.0000064101673,0.000015644144,0.92576444,0.05495073,0.00008128228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003210676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005444092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10281083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036275093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0131745115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1771400877","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139043281","title":"Aristotle: Eudemian Ethics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Happiness; Philosophy; Virtue ethics; Normative ethics; Meta-ethics; Epistemology; Ethical theories; Virtue; Moral philosophy; Information ethics; Engineering ethics; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.09896071264446027,"score_gpt":0.3358034430189233,"score_spread":0.23684273037446302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1771400877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007815935,0.000113287424,0.00015519898,0.002533211,0.0014421835,0.00029319528,0.00009780789,0.00017583882,0.99518144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007843443,0.00013649011,0.00014182119,0.0008751524,0.0010342868,0.000001016382,0.00009444125,0.000026182252,0.9969063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825346,0.00042831482,0.00016523937,0.00027519566,0.0005115225,0.00036624738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789256,0.00061981176,0.00031557045,0.00038365083,0.0005031634,0.00028527467],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096052344,0.00019446209,0.0002103141,0.00017429529,0.0012844371,0.00014981093,0.0005899741,0.00096750155,0.00006797364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047908747,0.00025182887,0.00011637596,0.000049271403,0.00057395885,0.00042086144,0.00013368443,0.0026563755,0.00014457096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005899555,0.000011609975,0.0000023726286,0.000018478113,0.000025663887,0.0000061910714,0.0033143114,7.170651e-8,0.0000013026868,0.5896007,0.4066621,0.00035133076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117776886,0.000006295285,0.000018856217,0.000044496006,0.00013396483,0.0000015516005,0.0012963981,6.77091e-7,0.000006006811,0.0000386876,0.99804986,0.00028545453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056763347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013269015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59138775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009123767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060230317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1777088795","doi":"","title":"Trends in Global and Canadian Lawyer Regulation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Globalization; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Order (exchange); Law; Sociology; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.014056789400844056,"score_gpt":0.32878871852553215,"score_spread":0.3147319291246881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1777088795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41331822,0.00046289933,0.00011570635,0.27568093,0.00038181696,0.00010529222,0.0000013970324,0.000017296798,0.30991644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99100626,0.00022035764,0.00004485082,0.00044888572,0.00017416997,0.0000032324997,0.0000022921552,0.000002437801,0.008097522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879456,0.000097148135,0.00011135395,0.00006634937,0.000116264135,0.0008143026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996896,0.000020482135,0.00005043623,0.000040053143,0.00008392072,0.00011554383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010440769,0.00003846788,0.000041360094,0.00015505178,0.00034910018,0.00019647065,0.00007118361,0.000050673192,0.0008754671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012844936,0.00003808756,0.000013153435,0.00058971427,0.00004191236,0.00078194536,0.0000032085425,0.00065521663,0.000046422825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010221562,0.000008295824,0.01791879,1.4690872e-7,0.0000053922718,1.5596953e-7,0.0012075242,0.000001610763,0.0000028759696,0.8805788,0.0015786103,0.09869674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021102397,0.000024790399,0.21541552,0.0000038988956,0.000005481967,0.00003626954,0.012444542,0.000035015695,6.80245e-7,0.48820755,0.2835139,0.000101326936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6675337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9568375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57768804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016347856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058869277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1777531247","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1026","title":"The Role of PLEI in Poverty Law Services","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019771404257513458,"score_gpt":0.3744577847136049,"score_spread":0.35468638045609147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1777531247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29075402,0.00027602437,0.0000015923385,0.24204701,0.00022550797,0.00006388845,0.0000043415343,0.0000043110012,0.4666233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937306,0.00011900346,0.000032944215,0.0051585915,0.0008501888,4.5508872e-7,2.1338266e-7,0.0000021963674,0.0001057875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937975,0.00008507119,0.00022022407,0.00002783986,0.00018350864,0.00010360691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994539,0.00008858101,0.00024260746,0.000027667002,0.00015309219,0.00003417541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060420355,0.000031867185,0.00008301609,0.000037217378,0.0005540107,0.000099512814,0.000115922245,0.00004829349,0.0000098990795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064904525,0.000022788707,0.0000356277,0.00019970183,0.00021222385,0.00045494983,0.0000102532995,0.00017756851,0.0000012848731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000957117,0.000035773664,0.00016174495,0.000002530707,0.000007211495,2.6673183e-7,0.052290622,8.914608e-7,0.000074347365,0.9463882,0.000054056025,0.0009747824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022910016,0.000018965095,0.0020862822,0.000008917853,0.000005631353,0.0000016046998,0.026790082,2.5802734e-7,0.000070352406,0.2513956,0.71936256,0.000030608466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12612739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0477922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7193085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067429755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000630451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9695831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1778197116","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2729","title":"The Ethical Obligations of Defence Counsel in Sexual Assault Cases","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Law; Value (mathematics); Position (finance); Closing (real estate); Criminology; Stereotype (UML); Legal ethics; Cross-examination; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Business","score_opus":0.052636546576277275,"score_gpt":0.39205267656244996,"score_spread":0.3394161299861727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1778197116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041364223,0.000112898306,0.0010411638,0.19669342,0.00096792553,0.00012889483,0.0000055299756,0.000023190329,0.75966275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971222,0.00008161128,0.0005926151,0.0013375503,0.00027360712,0.000005017521,0.0000012963683,0.000004483292,0.0005816057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982178,0.00065985514,0.000325409,0.000081318976,0.0005175607,0.000198011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968111,0.0022212986,0.00023566555,0.000120986646,0.0005177157,0.000093226336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042203204,0.00005420463,0.000082929226,0.00004383544,0.0015726397,0.00028980788,0.00026369255,0.0001418937,0.00014508389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043218816,0.0000412452,0.00002924117,0.00038149988,0.00041156722,0.00039848185,0.000011563218,0.001352925,0.000024284176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006245518,0.00004731071,0.0012783032,0.000001497523,0.000005778399,0.0000015985189,0.0037499696,0.00002931058,0.00006522246,0.99041075,0.0023189615,0.0020850438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037027584,0.00008939077,0.0048754215,0.00003938242,0.000021967748,0.00009813739,0.023007305,0.00016167152,0.00008784446,0.2965791,0.67450315,0.00016637001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09882233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5903399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063014435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006806203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1778949312","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv18pgtvp","title":"Propriété intellectuelle et université","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Diamond V; Université Laval","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.02877877099040622,"score_gpt":0.2517112519296599,"score_spread":0.22293248093925366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1778949312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004319419,0.0011658763,0.0011106789,0.017642375,0.0009392666,0.00060428935,0.000042288913,0.00023243624,0.97394335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1380024,0.0012840007,0.000633693,0.0019542773,0.0004842069,0.0000116531555,0.000054631528,0.00007511428,0.8575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970265,0.0008090755,0.00040203266,0.0006268215,0.00048383535,0.0006517097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644905,0.001178136,0.00064929633,0.0005551463,0.0007586557,0.00040971278],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068101607,0.0005112149,0.00045445526,0.00034909692,0.0015501468,0.0002295469,0.0013173707,0.0006507827,0.06632831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005413975,0.00060186716,0.0003003153,0.000306999,0.0014450299,0.0008014499,0.00046743543,0.0016419822,0.004331108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022201156,0.00031411904,0.0019997081,0.00019402301,0.00052714575,0.00012016622,0.26775527,0.00001685207,0.00010573447,0.27575082,0.38642526,0.066568896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041808622,0.00011419879,0.00039431258,0.00016565902,0.00047627577,0.000031868807,0.009519351,0.000030182187,0.0002353679,0.002411743,0.9855719,0.0006310298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23807557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1836804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59914666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01973405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1779249908","doi":"10.3968/5846","title":"Problems Existing in Supervision on Administrative Enforcement of Law and Countermeasur","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Irrationality; Administration (probate law); Independence (probability theory); Business; Enforcement; Transparency (behavior); Law; Political science; Rationality","score_opus":0.315151060697013,"score_gpt":0.5196730794185446,"score_spread":0.20452201872153158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1779249908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84212685,0.000091932794,0.0000037260063,0.0027444288,0.00022364275,0.000105425555,9.2602676e-7,0.0000029509545,0.1547001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992781,0.00012006348,0.00020901069,0.00032347548,0.00001645002,0.000009889191,2.364529e-7,8.614686e-7,0.00004189073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991623,0.00015395612,0.00022101328,0.00013591778,0.00019084015,0.0001359853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988232,0.00074234785,0.00012987042,0.000059584858,0.00022830238,0.000016682334],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038293374,0.000039727303,0.00012621877,0.00008345521,0.00030547348,0.0000046528,0.00013192251,0.000031539912,0.000011863847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002982166,0.000034518278,0.000007480713,0.0003066593,0.02461794,0.00022345797,0.000041473148,0.0001189864,6.489224e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037859375,0.00003030038,0.0040783742,0.000011679109,0.0000017422161,5.910804e-8,0.3450386,0.000010802744,0.00020074523,0.6503704,0.0000152105895,0.00023827759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041566542,0.00044346182,0.015986897,0.00022527436,0.0000038638273,3.6943456e-7,0.91130203,0.00008755541,0.0004818777,0.06080362,0.0101287905,0.00012057335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015513711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019115763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5895668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078117366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024581203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97803646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W178615311","doi":"","title":"A Quarter of a Century of Feminism in Law: Back to the Future?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; Feminist legal theory; Reproductive justice; Legislature; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Sexual assault; Economic Justice; Domestic violence; Law reform; Sociology; Gender studies; Criminology; Abortion; Poison control; History; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.01630730957435702,"score_gpt":0.31906487152308244,"score_spread":0.30275756194872544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W178615311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5375795,0.002334341,0.00041071518,0.27672324,0.0013570841,0.0003867865,0.0000037739896,0.000010163805,0.1811944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960636,0.0018119848,0.000074192074,0.0006307733,0.000390483,0.000002444607,4.2669853e-7,0.0000032864423,0.001022819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877673,0.00016849629,0.000234777,0.000056402732,0.0002312762,0.00053231686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995048,0.00008372283,0.00015477002,0.000086790875,0.00013332971,0.000036556714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016491025,0.00004164352,0.00008155108,0.00007463845,0.00021860078,0.000015630323,0.00021303761,0.00003929501,0.00019675418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009054678,0.000030559844,0.00004169713,0.00052075635,0.000111239104,0.00021340107,0.000007664785,0.0009096583,0.000028761853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017039687,0.00008042069,0.0011800254,0.0000011451536,0.000014434277,2.9427682e-7,0.042192552,0.0000032698101,0.000060760303,0.9526107,0.0020434542,0.0017959585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032616474,0.00014747758,0.0029117775,0.000013746072,0.0000086429145,0.00005776209,0.1379686,0.0000015120144,0.00006645328,0.053968094,0.80444336,0.00008643544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024049105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02835617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89864254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021040153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042525074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1795517192","doi":"","title":"Uphold professional values","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lund University Publications (Lund University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Family Medicine","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.028106727035747396,"score_gpt":0.28872019070120525,"score_spread":0.26061346366545785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1795517192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01076043,0.0000068770023,0.0006125275,0.0879516,0.00043445613,0.00037094593,0.00001962182,0.00026094285,0.8995826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018677274,0.000055479,0.0013129138,0.00049365795,0.00012813251,9.745087e-7,0.00007061273,0.000007959946,0.979253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857444,0.00032932707,0.000119402066,0.00031207496,0.0003283603,0.00033639852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979182,0.0002980129,0.00016551357,0.0003531217,0.000963443,0.000301709],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028188288,0.00011719309,0.000109989975,0.00085439876,0.0031322467,0.0002979506,0.0007257288,0.0001646456,0.006338009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028510037,0.00014767585,0.000082468374,0.003282489,0.0004060175,0.004675879,0.00012687671,0.00038192002,0.00080278626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005226657,0.00018384216,0.0011853226,0.0000026134196,0.000027145536,0.0000013908176,0.0039110924,0.0000027222602,0.00002777463,0.8890289,0.10508407,0.0005398695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002556548,0.00000996523,0.0041635185,0.000006026115,0.00003419938,8.4336676e-7,0.045602564,0.000030332167,0.0000037936554,0.0014653746,0.948253,0.00017475727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077686673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013966799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8875635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005446362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016316151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1806223527","doi":"","title":"Law Student Plagiarism: Contemporary Challenges and Responses","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal education; Law; Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology","score_opus":0.11740130473833077,"score_gpt":0.4077121056431218,"score_spread":0.29031080090479106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1806223527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13838777,0.055210616,0.0001258352,0.29792395,0.0009809477,0.00020989435,0.0000014602318,0.000072881936,0.50708663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810601,0.011828758,0.00004376909,0.0007388968,0.00043974363,0.0000042819447,7.404665e-7,0.0000069594153,0.0058767926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820507,0.00048068483,0.00016903473,0.00010598236,0.00034882102,0.0006904017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992111,0.00020364292,0.00012546111,0.00007728943,0.000228187,0.00015436056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061709713,0.00006628691,0.00008763277,0.00007262099,0.0004791829,0.00019002725,0.00015802996,0.00007757407,0.000018020426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006027146,0.000060319908,0.000021341602,0.00011683832,0.00015386974,0.0007896169,0.000020088704,0.0016479488,0.000027848093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004034252,0.00005695195,0.00039783257,6.424286e-7,0.00003438326,0.0000017655645,0.025979454,1.7016671e-7,0.0000042902316,0.9667111,0.001127683,0.0056453943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030652422,0.0001143197,0.00054263923,0.0000046195755,0.000007740692,0.000051367937,0.18722244,3.7506737e-7,0.0000029919308,0.24936993,0.56230253,0.00007452327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019103773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012473661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8426723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044955712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010824151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1808059804","doi":"","title":"Equipping the Garage Guys in Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maryland law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nature versus nurture; Legal education; Law; Curriculum; Globalization; Legal profession; Value (mathematics); Political science; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.14886619420749825,"score_gpt":0.3971725673052461,"score_spread":0.24830637309774783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1808059804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021213236,0.011893185,0.000009222059,0.04602613,0.0002266762,0.00026595566,9.3532293e-7,0.00002011895,0.94134563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8405516,0.034946144,0.00029014755,0.11786786,0.00032263252,0.000115645475,0.000010032768,0.000012058805,0.00588389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916995,0.000289454,0.00018430402,0.00008761645,0.00012613124,0.0001425734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995522,0.00013252907,0.000071394694,0.00016415333,0.000046102243,0.00003363132],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016291849,0.000048426464,0.00009768954,0.000011757017,0.00033467248,0.000056058958,0.0001959044,0.000027334023,0.0034175059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020798593,0.000031821324,0.000031348623,0.0003799997,0.00017074174,0.0003240362,0.000019818053,0.00018541682,0.00023074729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.209211e-7,0.000022746903,0.00010214309,0.00006632291,0.000002560509,0.0000014406689,0.0028190329,1.5469913e-8,7.025773e-7,0.9858013,0.0077872216,0.003395715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034801655,0.0000038746816,0.0002327538,0.00026268276,0.0000097106595,0.0000010180518,0.0002126869,2.9746215e-7,0.0000020975026,0.0039659017,0.99522346,0.00005069047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029313797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016634742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98743623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025532561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108694505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1813242488","doi":"","title":"The Language of Supreme Court Briefs: A Large-Scale Quantitative Investigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Skepticism; Political science; Scope (computer science); Majority opinion; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.025344717686607638,"score_gpt":0.3886354509415238,"score_spread":0.3632907332549162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1813242488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81222177,0.000689777,0.00018107131,0.16954857,0.00039257284,0.00014491398,0.0000030328854,0.000006346627,0.016811922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965128,0.0010220853,0.0007780133,0.0009600342,0.00019842097,0.0000010830923,6.216725e-7,0.000005446254,0.00052149675],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987463,0.0004066479,0.00030963466,0.000049522805,0.00036142624,0.00012649843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949997,0.0028345345,0.00095948804,0.000101119804,0.0010415569,0.000063613545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068751345,0.000055815264,0.0000905132,0.000042066422,0.00068367925,0.00015817757,0.00024026817,0.000051440962,0.000055787754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005223735,0.000032237527,0.000023245471,0.0003921475,0.00034990517,0.0013962118,0.000015531887,0.00066631066,0.000007597149],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005523244,0.00016815144,0.0013934671,0.000046088084,0.00012380932,0.0000022907395,0.91358536,0.000022450276,0.008357278,0.0647594,0.0058231656,0.00516622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031888482,0.00011816885,0.0007943502,0.000035183206,0.00016458772,0.00006803142,0.55618215,0.00010780583,0.0028312504,0.008738125,0.43055066,0.000090818714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079193624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018252371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4247275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008448806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006866975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6253676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814677584","doi":"10.18352/ijca.125","title":"The Development and Role of the Court Administrator in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Court Administration","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Christian ministry; Administration of justice; Political science; Law; Public administration; Work (physics); Corporate governance; Public relations; Sociology; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.03635268948329878,"score_gpt":0.35724334599905183,"score_spread":0.32089065651575305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814677584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89100647,0.000090187714,0.00008421469,0.10083512,0.0023823977,0.00022363664,0.000014173546,0.0000037208035,0.005360083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983429,0.000071309805,0.00033152846,0.00023339613,0.00022555013,0.00001619716,0.0000038282556,0.0000033570761,0.00077195483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887574,0.000065509186,0.00035966115,0.00006493851,0.00052371103,0.00011041466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872935,0.0003445032,0.00028375184,0.000053698113,0.0005355551,0.000053164815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006496897,0.00005034216,0.00005236979,0.00003364825,0.00084761385,0.000116427866,0.0002827746,0.000027208562,0.000024882234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000734658,0.00003529856,0.00002447085,0.00010996688,0.00010458172,0.00025778273,0.000012345488,0.00017811666,6.247089e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074787426,0.00053690386,0.34341094,0.000014313961,0.00034544934,0.000030104984,0.06415589,0.00007702166,0.0009991678,0.47596988,0.060911737,0.052800708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022642307,0.000019454174,0.05840016,0.000015111722,0.0000045643133,0.000061853694,0.013143783,0.000058514142,0.0012465536,0.0016326234,0.92512774,0.00006318507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0628797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.880479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.864216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040058716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017444596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98812556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1820456544","doi":"","title":"Legislation Assessment Lesson Is the Construction Direction of Freshmen Seminar for Law Major in China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Legislation; Curriculum; Diversity (politics); Humanism; Law; Expression (computer science); Class (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Legal writing; Mathematics education; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Legal research; Engineering; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022377182205602815,"score_gpt":0.36969585663232074,"score_spread":0.34731867442671793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1820456544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06456914,0.0000088607,0.00077113026,0.09860636,0.001213073,0.00052113907,0.000026119907,0.000017128017,0.8342671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979261,0.0000032946507,0.00052103325,0.00082325534,0.0002499433,0.00003148272,0.0000037655366,0.000002877747,0.0004382143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990877,0.00011317705,0.00014879712,0.00014374839,0.0002728482,0.00023374337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993477,0.00012812785,0.0001334524,0.000081037644,0.00022374338,0.000085923486],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023184423,0.00004454442,0.000065879394,0.00013119762,0.0018278544,0.00015673164,0.00020435614,0.00005677836,0.00007436436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044957697,0.00004187984,0.000024203291,0.0011802291,0.0009171315,0.00068919064,0.0000067655087,0.00012248673,0.0000022268027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013890038,0.000008441233,0.0049792905,0.0000021990538,0.0000014048995,2.1463812e-8,0.018740442,0.0000012636668,0.00028758703,0.95821166,0.0017735936,0.015992709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014940948,0.000019505578,0.041635927,0.000010092718,0.000008728232,3.1553054e-7,0.016679289,0.0002586747,0.00031509512,0.014836073,0.9259821,0.00010477591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35381263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4733595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9433756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006426595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018845304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1821066401","doi":"","title":"The Preclusion of Nonlawyer Ownership of Law Firms: Protecting the Interest of Clients or Protecting the Interest of Lawyers?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Practice of law; Commission; Law; Legal ethics; Professional conduct; Legal profession; Business; Legal service; Commercial law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.07780946816225806,"score_gpt":0.3734540263227241,"score_spread":0.2956445581604661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1821066401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95297307,0.00023130231,0.0015603966,0.03176253,0.0005477695,0.000996859,0.0000023071814,0.000012843626,0.011912927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987891,0.0001259603,0.00004814712,0.00008389437,0.00022660854,0.000016515443,3.6447202e-7,0.000010872235,0.00069856923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960931,0.0020631065,0.0006803579,0.0001127399,0.000406518,0.0006441897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430925,0.002576713,0.0022445456,0.00026734517,0.0005700476,0.000032131127],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019155249,0.00009921571,0.00017376743,0.000059214435,0.0018282996,0.000074172414,0.0007861014,0.00007516102,0.000046357683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011818679,0.00004525975,0.000111269335,0.0005446904,0.00059791934,0.00031871148,0.000087914545,0.0031567905,0.0000018197196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032879377,0.00020195097,0.00073937647,0.000050732546,0.00017067333,7.218387e-8,0.053110458,0.000022098642,0.005247838,0.8900732,0.000054807435,0.04999999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015996709,0.0022503217,0.0011182331,0.0010378441,0.00022470325,0.00008367046,0.61510634,0.00024985822,0.044401776,0.21294858,0.12057781,0.00040118487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043196464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04947758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6771246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019542071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021327336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1822131644","doi":"","title":"Electronic Records and the Law of Evidence in Canada: The Uniform Electronic Evidence Act Twelve Years Later","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Electronic records; Relevance (law); Confusion; Enforcement; Law; Rules of evidence; Empirical evidence; Law enforcement; Political science; Business; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03647071615937462,"score_gpt":0.33617169479253667,"score_spread":0.29970097863316203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1822131644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.843936,0.004385193,0.000039402526,0.14739893,0.000541606,0.00040077997,9.0942655e-7,0.000011560864,0.0032855824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806556,0.016869335,0.000010522278,0.00100698,0.00025820947,0.000016699367,4.51345e-7,0.000011804154,0.0011703961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963455,0.00057739497,0.00042112035,0.00018247016,0.00055537757,0.0019180881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973733,0.0016992356,0.00036782108,0.0002679326,0.00022231136,0.000069437105],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011016777,0.00012894966,0.00018482027,0.00007791798,0.0006571928,0.00017658796,0.00073351775,0.0000806226,0.00016935074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018658157,0.0000759054,0.00006298708,0.00075954833,0.0004951082,0.00110086,0.000041072402,0.005823618,0.000006696327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011190953,0.000017082053,0.0052226875,0.000002564805,0.000049386454,6.378543e-7,0.0037122343,0.000005984772,0.00009836337,0.9831141,0.00019123986,0.007473758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001482116,0.0003287839,0.024382401,0.00016253562,0.0001641923,0.0003089126,0.0365113,0.00014503382,0.00018889667,0.64914674,0.28665867,0.0005204365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8685273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33396742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068622105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1827276926","doi":"10.3968/5607","title":"Discussion on Beyond of Marx's Philosophy of Law From the Perspective of the Nature of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Law; Dialectic; Rationality; Philosophy; Aside; Unification; Philosophy of law; Materialism; Universal law; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Comparative law; Political science","score_opus":0.024814447563342515,"score_gpt":0.3772037284739288,"score_spread":0.3523892809105863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1827276926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078744456,0.000047448826,0.00000218591,0.081873015,0.0015197828,0.0002041247,0.000030410609,0.0000045958022,0.837574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974089,0.000004085262,0.000120073986,0.0010492132,0.00032657414,0.00000534084,0.0000020491889,0.0000035460469,0.0010801856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998403,0.00025478887,0.00029203243,0.00015449659,0.0007918978,0.00010377072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744385,0.00039301443,0.00074641133,0.00025089967,0.0011338685,0.00003195927],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009904054,0.000063515974,0.0001424165,0.0000494635,0.0005259877,0.000019137571,0.00065114145,0.00009269131,0.0002870317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000517954,0.000035659716,0.00007712148,0.0011254365,0.0036262465,0.00037183316,0.000047163277,0.0002251911,0.0000016140465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010257789,0.00025956385,0.0005989195,0.000007047014,0.000005636377,1.208139e-9,0.04467107,8.1367074e-7,0.004546843,0.94897455,0.00071716134,0.00020811334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019942631,0.00008108718,0.25649574,0.000118433025,0.000048112724,4.561521e-8,0.029490326,0.0000011000641,0.02217044,0.5241315,0.16713896,0.00012484526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012534264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019578898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91866446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009102069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012100021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1827817526","doi":"","title":"Lawyers Gone Bad: Money Sex and Madness in Canada's Legal Profession (Philip Slayton)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal profession; Political science","score_opus":0.03728442380868719,"score_gpt":0.35877167323164394,"score_spread":0.32148724942295676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1827817526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09304176,0.09508246,0.0000045313195,0.07104802,0.0016016772,0.0015475269,0.00004286604,0.0000474987,0.73758364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91347915,0.082573235,0.000022581675,0.0031964811,0.000086260276,0.00003394443,0.000027713604,0.000007414811,0.0005732227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998646,0.00016648475,0.0004227405,0.00019018297,0.000343387,0.0002311989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993075,0.00006934163,0.00021127006,0.0001573755,0.000120817276,0.00013367526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008548428,0.00011487875,0.000285065,0.000029688328,0.00042827943,0.000023239592,0.00012566481,0.00004468503,0.00009613134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000796827,0.00008928783,0.000027814074,0.00035076847,0.0002961927,0.0005870239,0.00004094357,0.0002998415,0.0000042062684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067115598,0.00007630276,0.0012426091,0.001332973,0.00000724301,0.0000023537084,0.0017571318,5.7991695e-8,0.00000456305,0.97585326,0.0024655776,0.01725124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017475462,0.000010345113,0.0010973442,0.0015535939,0.0000134995535,0.0000062168574,0.0008371855,0.000002031433,0.000024592877,0.00024307358,0.9959167,0.000120637065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8832024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88437593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9934511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002449566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015031922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36410522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834083885","doi":"","title":"Do Codes of Ethics Actually Shape Legal Practice","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ethical code; Deliberation; Legal ethics; Professional conduct; Ethical dilemma; Political science; Professional responsibility; Dilemma; Engineering ethics; Action (physics); Professional ethics; Legal profession; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.20164652755208584,"score_gpt":0.44091636373665494,"score_spread":0.2392698361845691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834083885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91724724,0.000052018953,0.00006591008,0.01888791,0.0002964942,0.00022157896,0.000022949582,0.00012042671,0.063085504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634128,0.0003785101,0.00023522908,0.0024403825,0.00017525694,9.234632e-7,0.000014413859,0.000020390662,0.033322062],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996858,0.0012847364,0.00031026322,0.00036698073,0.00079473277,0.00038527756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673414,0.0014582812,0.00032597737,0.00040123382,0.0008453679,0.00023499258],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021812278,0.00018234488,0.00022508077,0.00031469538,0.00087328005,0.00061442365,0.0007965277,0.00034864512,0.0018715737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019674872,0.00021728802,0.000098598684,0.0012539985,0.00041613152,0.0073952503,0.000075897275,0.0015096702,0.0005006858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008795569,0.001539866,0.7109607,0.000115288334,0.00038108559,0.00025732198,0.14214827,0.00006602395,0.000677394,0.11826661,0.00008412707,0.024623783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004962152,0.00008737703,0.11097222,0.00008200409,0.00011861121,0.000015169837,0.01652941,1.4782e-7,0.00022871554,0.00023679636,0.8709116,0.00032176077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033711627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061719916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87082744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020673803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017531823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1836597817","doi":"10.3968/5845","title":"Study on the Path to Cultivate Interdisciplinary Talents of Law in Universities of Science and Technology","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Social needs; Path (computing); Mode (computer interface); Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Business; Engineering management; Engineering; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.034695889604914494,"score_gpt":0.41214661288650256,"score_spread":0.3774507232815881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1836597817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7967467,0.000002628691,0.0000013109255,0.016380347,0.0003101626,0.00018046949,0.0000011204976,0.000004805357,0.18637249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892384,7.1363064e-7,0.000065102395,0.00019315374,0.00002892974,0.000009641899,1.306093e-7,0.0000014967135,0.0007769978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894845,0.00008860919,0.00016672708,0.00015238408,0.00051808526,0.0001257285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987234,0.00012939576,0.0001782213,0.00011997602,0.0008119709,0.000037023507],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021045664,0.000041472693,0.00008327869,0.00039356184,0.0007243444,0.000031331925,0.00047652324,0.00002546542,0.000037184327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034544856,0.000034235378,0.000008077348,0.003820113,0.0050018947,0.00047476665,0.00014466401,0.00008952924,0.0000020560149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036904464,0.0002626287,0.0041047228,0.000002958082,8.7822855e-7,1.2488442e-8,0.10646777,2.430465e-7,0.00282334,0.8857764,0.00012553373,0.00043181248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109375535,0.00016296559,0.49343455,0.000042385775,0.0000051523684,8.2954145e-8,0.48227116,0.000001014931,0.0026260389,0.008437309,0.012835556,0.0000743989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013658673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006460456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8773391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001658774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018213736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99770594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1836816068","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1026330","title":"Legislative Ethics and Codes of Conduct","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Ethical code; Political science; Legal ethics; Law and economics; Law; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.08425468168519405,"score_gpt":0.4292144516438294,"score_spread":0.3449597699586353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1836816068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44237405,0.0033146534,0.008261517,0.38037914,0.0006970282,0.00022095117,0.000004254987,0.00003729325,0.16471113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938212,0.0036962202,0.0002929914,0.00031752366,0.00014992761,9.245879e-7,6.326984e-7,0.00000347557,0.0017171148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988737,0.00022078832,0.00013920471,0.00005936842,0.00020877164,0.00049818173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992195,0.0002728925,0.00015262394,0.000041643118,0.00027103964,0.00004232542],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004095024,0.00004078847,0.000069022535,0.00006037398,0.0006049708,0.000068203044,0.00008920681,0.000066574365,0.00005545776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016530993,0.000037041827,0.00002113985,0.00024786263,0.00023497154,0.00056208024,0.0000067536216,0.0028343906,0.000005943285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004670218,0.000024726556,0.00026094494,0.000001078522,0.000024928418,1.4010274e-7,0.03500175,0.000004901394,0.00014332095,0.963008,0.00003594081,0.0014896058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027998816,0.000084571366,0.00027909453,0.00001100527,0.00001538644,0.00003122388,0.07499701,4.6790933e-7,0.00012890201,0.8450028,0.07910643,0.000063134605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048613115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01714237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55144715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031572208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015681066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1841882670","doi":"","title":"Judgment Proofing the Profession","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; General partnership; Limited liability partnership; Liability; Legislation; Legal profession; Business; Legislature; Limited partnership; Law; Limited liability; Legal liability; Political science; Public relations","score_opus":0.04434517224874648,"score_gpt":0.3616315726299164,"score_spread":0.31728640038116995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1841882670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08726647,0.00015431321,0.00013324725,0.30589283,0.0017879483,0.00052868115,9.787909e-7,0.00013726851,0.60409826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94841564,0.000051654883,0.00046005132,0.00794121,0.00086448353,0.000082674625,0.0000035282899,0.000007903168,0.04217287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988573,0.00025896094,0.00016691942,0.00013915596,0.00034118237,0.00023648803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992509,0.00019556083,0.0000973775,0.0002172817,0.00013919985,0.000099714],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011192138,0.00006500451,0.00005929867,0.00002615729,0.0016584562,0.00029798303,0.00024692883,0.00006092258,0.0020810582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065011805,0.00004596213,0.000031370007,0.0005233897,0.00013140608,0.0007113262,0.00003169477,0.000385859,0.00066324556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009347956,0.00009447166,0.0037117074,0.000003327315,0.00000847614,0.0000017775467,0.007984883,0.000006854245,0.00014452073,0.93573654,0.04753647,0.004761641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009020997,0.000008640059,0.0015140095,0.000016107846,0.0000063610014,0.0000012013146,0.006417144,0.0000059241197,0.000084876985,0.004294312,0.9874879,0.00007332306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0082579525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067694928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9399514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106194995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004707648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1842772683","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020130906.3012","title":"China’s Law Teaching Methods Reform","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interactivity; Citizen journalism; Democracy; China; Order (exchange); Mathematics education; Teaching method; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Multimedia; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.07518091959226812,"score_gpt":0.5111097227346213,"score_spread":0.43592880314235316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1842772683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11412866,0.00012848534,0.00015382632,0.087742575,0.00025271022,0.00026271152,0.0000013857529,0.00019439126,0.79713523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94916284,0.000073331656,0.036925767,0.0015017979,0.0001332837,0.00008751725,0.000067640554,0.000008477945,0.012039347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838173,0.0007972447,0.00027737825,0.00013535166,0.00019184391,0.00021645312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983759,0.00017190757,0.00019774283,0.0005659692,0.0005996308,0.00008885758],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019599209,0.000092338196,0.00009537684,0.000034519577,0.003568121,0.002002816,0.000647442,0.0001084686,0.0010334926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001335863,0.00007536931,0.000051861887,0.00027286037,0.0006427303,0.0057077967,0.00009963817,0.00069595216,0.00043360834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016408765,0.000040711544,0.00012076006,0.000002617592,0.0000074835407,2.028544e-8,0.021719169,0.0000014679434,0.00083435874,0.9308904,0.0030016792,0.04337971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099809484,0.000008181347,0.018024005,0.000010777758,0.000006588408,0.000001349435,0.012772556,0.000046031575,0.00024004946,0.018601673,0.9500481,0.00014086971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15619813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024256818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94704646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034991876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001213791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1842859705","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1209","title":"The Public Interest, Professionalism, and Pro Bono Publico","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Legal profession; Political science; Sociology; Point (geometry); Simple (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.21481834687733037,"score_gpt":0.41038436692733593,"score_spread":0.19556602005000556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1842859705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008371145,0.00040107174,0.000040758492,0.45953867,0.0011028266,0.000118340504,0.0000012579034,0.000031559066,0.5303944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98728365,0.00043820406,0.00029692185,0.0020731925,0.00056090415,0.000014361408,0.00000190437,0.0000079625115,0.009322903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862397,0.0003813136,0.00024728334,0.00010742633,0.00034760177,0.00029242566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868333,0.0003444037,0.00021378943,0.000121819714,0.00045242708,0.00018423244],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016815073,0.00007295287,0.000072995215,0.00005110638,0.0067692623,0.0011398401,0.00029678093,0.0000702806,0.0004538312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011319653,0.000048354384,0.00003671439,0.00029004438,0.0005209627,0.0018068982,0.00004605617,0.00080151734,0.000043541015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054552956,0.000054662596,0.0008181086,0.000001006733,0.000013130582,0.0000050604085,0.0026752793,2.848412e-8,0.000008733392,0.96210295,0.030790059,0.0035255095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013511395,0.000013704703,0.0008919201,0.000008935311,0.0000040195773,0.00022513591,0.0035401557,0.0000036101558,0.0000068803156,0.05899399,0.9361068,0.000069739275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044929776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0702139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9789125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007263431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011075914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1843743322","doi":"","title":"Myths and Tips on the Support Guidelines","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Law; Political science; Operations research; Public relations; Psychology; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.057015752919928255,"score_gpt":0.4034267589419707,"score_spread":0.34641100602204244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1843743322","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024504391,0.00028373708,0.00027262725,0.8048971,0.00026334348,0.00008292582,4.1514693e-7,0.000020995192,0.16967444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97221583,0.0025414326,0.00005422332,0.009249075,0.0007257326,0.0000013795369,6.5566263e-7,0.000003238709,0.015208414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877095,0.00012136332,0.00015459489,0.00006960937,0.0002244573,0.00065900094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946153,0.00012868375,0.00009650641,0.00007205759,0.00019315946,0.000048043672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00350632,0.00004981363,0.00004659765,0.00004707716,0.0008793091,0.00019592536,0.00014674634,0.000034543376,0.00027655336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011811311,0.000032977834,0.000024942075,0.00022228035,0.000055097375,0.00029499957,0.0000039577562,0.0012354318,0.000058824684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005330481,0.000019337473,0.00007760391,8.806619e-8,0.000008258808,2.036722e-7,0.0015444824,4.834748e-7,0.000013179008,0.9327227,0.022704301,0.04290403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069993475,0.00010135778,0.00032221182,0.0000026262735,0.000006776218,0.000049201884,0.014073909,0.000002725733,0.000006337076,0.29077706,0.6945399,0.000047861435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018237266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014012755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94771147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019757716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042271963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7498865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1843977442","doi":"10.7202/1032676ar","title":"Private International Law Implications in Conflicts of Interest for Lawyers Licensed in Multiple Countries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Law; Choice of law; Political science; Private law; Face (sociological concept); Subject (documents); Common law; Comparative law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.23781578822940264,"score_gpt":0.4188271401048644,"score_spread":0.18101135187546175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1843977442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21200867,0.00004786529,0.0003557771,0.16230296,0.0025250732,0.0007832041,0.00022719786,0.000041300107,0.621708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722075,0.000026511696,0.0012193806,0.001164623,0.00013387248,0.000025887464,0.000012005055,0.000006889173,0.00019007866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903226,0.00011228853,0.00041128098,0.00009827844,0.00016838688,0.00017749018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855804,0.00039417262,0.00025876876,0.00008742206,0.0005952711,0.000106339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013602576,0.00006147823,0.00011263439,0.00013296226,0.00055510766,0.000108938904,0.00025419288,0.00006517523,0.0000809114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001276878,0.00006252469,0.000034494053,0.0002695249,0.00021518885,0.0008096768,0.000021037189,0.0002827202,0.0000103405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047481255,0.000108205895,0.004728782,0.0000025676638,0.000010259475,7.669593e-7,0.004704894,0.000031063417,0.00006239422,0.98970985,0.00036610008,0.00022764727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096528727,0.0000235385,0.0022617849,0.00002736385,0.0000039538563,0.000005543862,0.0029576365,0.000031157233,0.00025197156,0.010226528,0.98317397,0.000071272756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012703472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2738666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9828079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026480012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001438623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99387103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W184678394","doi":"","title":"Reflecting on Three Reviews of Reflection Without Rules","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflection (computer programming); Epistemology; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.16867140929002483,"score_gpt":0.42091115201078805,"score_spread":0.2522397427207632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W184678394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.655324,0.00011511382,0.0034447622,0.0018442287,0.00040178205,0.00021926947,0.0000034984048,0.000040375246,0.338607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905201,0.00016089402,0.0041773324,0.00013062565,0.0000710259,5.116541e-7,0.0000053544686,0.000006834685,0.0049272836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987864,0.00037564937,0.00019160504,0.0001806394,0.00029112288,0.00017460748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987678,0.00020461135,0.00044283664,0.00021424117,0.00030319372,0.00006733573],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015069167,0.00008535912,0.00020516505,0.00018499797,0.0008764217,0.00004195063,0.0001883472,0.000097321536,0.0009786233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015687189,0.000101960446,0.000099648074,0.0007648503,0.00026640645,0.00065579085,0.000014966574,0.00024407331,0.00011596512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002123925,0.000080153906,0.0061821346,0.00001981569,0.000020393236,3.2292846e-7,0.010901155,0.000005125158,0.000038241105,0.9811631,0.001316098,0.00025221583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017066099,0.000049783896,0.0010521974,0.0000266803,0.000032400996,9.028403e-7,0.014836399,0.0000029395862,0.000004755166,0.8255614,0.15816677,0.0000950891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041380688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013272217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33519617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016383672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000360497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847535399","doi":"","title":"Archival Research in the History of the Law: A User's Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Archivist; Law; Excuse; Legal history; Political science; Law library; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.1339406817634796,"score_gpt":0.36232565690012836,"score_spread":0.22838497513664877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847535399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009597498,0.000019035358,0.000007955311,0.05668196,0.0005829309,0.0004132461,0.000036437315,0.000007573496,0.93265337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907585,0.00002511553,0.00051318394,0.001460533,0.00012527192,0.000036562466,0.0000054142806,0.000010141945,0.0070653176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995036,0.0030749028,0.0003649589,0.0001880136,0.0008679292,0.00046816634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965179,0.002219138,0.00032306384,0.00040280924,0.00039922536,0.00013783925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005342081,0.00008453501,0.0001438662,0.00082320534,0.00046875403,0.000034778248,0.00094219745,0.000047427726,0.00014929537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028982067,0.000067510184,0.00009833082,0.0015706007,0.00083226856,0.0002588212,0.000044808225,0.0008706215,0.000020762986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009988952,0.000072383504,0.0042680553,0.0000038261346,0.000017473236,7.185187e-7,0.27232262,5.555092e-7,0.000022980785,0.7069993,0.016092176,0.00018992237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014332612,0.0000220656,0.24154894,0.000020997873,0.000010940209,4.6755562e-7,0.014526997,0.0000040463115,0.000010113562,0.23271643,0.51092345,0.00007221522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90175164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.849711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98116094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019655954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008859134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848332561","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice Metrics: Applicability to Service Delivery","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Service delivery framework; Service (business); Economic Justice; Business; Internet privacy; Political science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.05579260168031403,"score_gpt":0.3725999419171091,"score_spread":0.3168073402367951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1848332561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4020329,0.000040475396,0.0011714633,0.29414207,0.0013875365,0.0016826888,0.000018773486,0.00025169604,0.2992724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90148425,0.000008821973,0.0049955957,0.088773824,0.00075096986,0.00040577853,0.0000074899153,0.00001491766,0.0035583717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825037,0.0002068328,0.00029366906,0.0003679501,0.0004885677,0.00039260663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969934,0.0006091934,0.000089032976,0.00046046457,0.0011813879,0.00066648977],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009923668,0.00012196458,0.00014399526,0.00014714597,0.00083197403,0.0012957634,0.0008294623,0.00010470819,0.0064177597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029393292,0.00012655287,0.000038671922,0.003646077,0.000053387073,0.0024656034,0.00017734591,0.0003478976,0.013947569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003875367,0.0005374697,0.010193355,0.00009997537,0.000048599148,0.0000016280592,0.014046561,0.00019912742,0.00095761166,0.4694964,0.48265833,0.021722203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008544584,0.000016121969,0.009921576,0.000007883623,0.000026188849,2.9756885e-7,0.0041853227,0.000012488786,0.00014561547,0.002346322,0.98305786,0.00019489836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16201586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039575994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50039953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024686113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005431011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1861573952","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v29i3.183337","title":"Emberley on Hot Button Politics in Canada's Universities: A Critique","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Politics; Restructuring; Higher education; False accusation; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Public administration; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.030190713389115907,"score_gpt":0.3715178976055174,"score_spread":0.3413271842164015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1861573952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56814605,0.00018188961,0.0000015598866,0.18949082,0.005995783,0.00007901427,0.000012899693,0.0000021183978,0.23608986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95980936,0.000012044243,0.0000507357,0.0037118145,0.0006576535,0.0000013132875,0.0000026376604,0.0000051686,0.035749253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925447,0.000102827726,0.00018317209,0.000064109554,0.00017271755,0.00022271245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986379,0.00009588608,0.00027237952,0.00016155702,0.00041810147,0.0004141438],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002862909,0.00005502613,0.00008126918,0.00026066598,0.00077785907,0.00026441287,0.000318671,0.000049014434,0.0011167184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034498321,0.00006251737,0.00002155699,0.00013655702,0.000096404074,0.00069651165,0.0000026502885,0.00030747865,0.000009036257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007948134,0.000057241254,0.055266827,0.000008238438,0.000014790679,0.000034082666,0.016047409,0.000016004065,0.0000041043927,0.59374464,0.3328995,0.0018991929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000755284,0.000011428742,0.15305045,0.000045647004,0.0000059946683,0.0000032226267,0.017800936,3.340225e-7,0.000010192974,0.00162085,0.8273122,0.000063241874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5921238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040342477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15001088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1869046865","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2349633","title":"The Future of Legal Education: Three Visions and a Prediction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Vision; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.007296153691436118,"score_gpt":0.3077334027635065,"score_spread":0.3004372490720704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1869046865","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28559136,0.013411231,0.0012647345,0.6241295,0.003871768,0.0005494397,0.000002302183,0.00004308154,0.0711366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852906,0.0068699336,0.000085962274,0.0002104997,0.0014063892,0.0000158482,0.0000011750179,0.0000043626374,0.0061152456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898386,0.00008675925,0.00017423507,0.00006272921,0.00020729538,0.00048510268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923474,0.00010669943,0.00015204841,0.00008380475,0.00036472082,0.00005799914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013739138,0.000044239485,0.000046136447,0.00004939028,0.0012998938,0.0002532215,0.00014388241,0.000044659155,0.00012586689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001918307,0.0000307653,0.00002695256,0.00029127332,0.00012480022,0.00086015434,0.000009729759,0.0010507359,0.000015063446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000273398,0.000031301788,0.0016039202,5.443095e-7,0.00001640244,9.66924e-9,0.0009974766,2.5747363e-7,0.000016583424,0.8672134,0.004464076,0.12565325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007031004,0.000044615703,0.008437459,0.000004527988,0.000011361608,0.00003004439,0.047234885,0.000008342953,0.0000019080005,0.33797377,0.60614747,0.000035307472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025485593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015507762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6996992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000204973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010620789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W187370142","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2606","title":"A Community of Procedure Scholars: Teaching Procedure and the Legal Academy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Dalhousie University; Queen's University","funders":"European Commission; University of Oxford","keywords":"Scholarship; Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Academic community; Economic Justice; Political science; Civil procedure; Sociology; Law; Library science; Social science; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.03921757857895782,"score_gpt":0.36200707918914404,"score_spread":0.32278950061018624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W187370142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09223925,0.00025029035,0.000031322008,0.22517611,0.00015059796,0.00033226455,0.000001714618,0.00002588625,0.68179256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941634,0.0000669514,0.00077686587,0.0032272087,0.0003019574,0.00001824263,8.25416e-7,0.000008085223,0.0014364889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978414,0.0012358847,0.00029668154,0.00007356975,0.0003493944,0.00020303193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998773,0.00039116808,0.00033340548,0.00010369801,0.00027492546,0.00012382843],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041707326,0.000083929284,0.00013312075,0.00004577289,0.004052634,0.0008778367,0.00039146107,0.000108369655,0.0002739688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024405126,0.000056076064,0.000047625927,0.0001928708,0.0005718761,0.0026137722,0.00004979263,0.0036883573,0.000017848866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014081413,0.000082775754,0.0005322761,0.000014445964,0.000024592757,2.4030865e-7,0.02155801,0.000001514189,0.00010168133,0.9714298,0.0049172807,0.0013232604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018528734,0.000070193884,0.008735617,0.00020968306,0.0000937979,0.00039205325,0.104112744,0.00007121866,0.00011882463,0.41553247,0.46851182,0.0002986786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11861035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02975369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90192413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043135686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046237363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1875753037","doi":"10.3968/5601","title":"On Conflicts and Reconciliation Between Judicial Examination and Undergraduate Law Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Test (biology); Law; Undergraduate education; Political science; Psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.04360118209250036,"score_gpt":0.38828044266649897,"score_spread":0.3446792605739986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1875753037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33516642,0.000025141979,0.000038732043,0.021134637,0.0013381118,0.00023057118,0.0000024156682,0.000033136184,0.64203084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99203116,0.000017654895,0.00023758796,0.0018026539,0.0007231382,0.000024440958,0.000012771387,0.0000058555133,0.005144753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859995,0.00023984039,0.00023721819,0.00026344886,0.0004873275,0.00017220776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849105,0.00033779198,0.00029743058,0.00009845447,0.00064929365,0.00012600553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018226944,0.000084146595,0.00011227357,0.00019919575,0.0012980786,0.00022849758,0.00014238166,0.00008649702,0.00009240506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000669198,0.00009331612,0.000014854204,0.00086355256,0.001145838,0.0010964796,0.000019672558,0.00013978628,0.00001345222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002169199,0.00007965071,0.0013184587,0.0000075403823,0.0000020199711,2.4730182e-9,0.0090168975,8.7691554e-8,0.0002275239,0.95150566,0.00070668984,0.037133314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012356183,0.000046668803,0.5472851,0.000022478314,0.000018542063,1.6993364e-7,0.0021727073,0.0000028261024,0.00022579552,0.08352118,0.36644554,0.00013542431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027169902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007835824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8679845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018654898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001553766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1877660563","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1262","title":"“In the Public Interest”: Understanding the Special Role of the Government Lawyer","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Duty; Government (linguistics); Statutory law; Law; Political science; Professional responsibility; Accountability; Privilege (computing); Independence (probability theory); Sociology","score_opus":0.12537515861139115,"score_gpt":0.36462496471338257,"score_spread":0.23924980610199142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1877660563","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007078085,0.0026908994,0.000011140115,0.64246887,0.00056373584,0.0007223473,0.0000027137344,0.000005077561,0.35282743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97707415,0.0026740863,0.000011330827,0.018737998,0.00053364655,0.00006544544,6.981511e-7,0.000004392934,0.00089825754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834365,0.0006502978,0.00025146015,0.000088195906,0.0005062187,0.00016016894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990101,0.00038870788,0.00016976558,0.00031662264,0.0000898722,0.000024945553],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00204484,0.000061713814,0.00010088845,0.000006830501,0.00045748544,0.00020068785,0.0006413019,0.000027544953,0.004349411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006923798,0.000028644696,0.00007334338,0.0005023485,0.00027726268,0.00056085666,0.000050123483,0.00026389817,0.00012002084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1751998e-7,0.000030246174,0.00013706602,0.00002210427,0.0000055354785,5.0840026e-8,0.0024766764,3.1013343e-8,0.0000064193073,0.9146862,0.08207081,0.00056456646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003109635,0.000003822402,0.00021941081,0.00014999328,0.000015301419,8.720677e-7,0.010073605,0.0000011823408,0.0000042946326,0.024028542,0.9654336,0.000038305956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014029501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011763037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97636634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001987259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020479066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99656075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882616792","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2761","title":"What is Access to Justice?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Phrase; Sociology; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.08212132142299404,"score_gpt":0.43906419654195983,"score_spread":0.3569428751189658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1882616792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005993294,0.000044192166,0.0014519402,0.2672702,0.0034413554,0.00006809835,8.4390354e-7,0.000024939083,0.72709906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511386,0.00021513003,0.0013169067,0.03977854,0.0019988667,0.0000053838653,0.0000010477099,0.000009660204,0.005535818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987556,0.00022585096,0.0002140676,0.0001248315,0.00041202173,0.00026767646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987903,0.00022101948,0.00014582564,0.00014561643,0.00038897613,0.0003082568],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014007072,0.000072230396,0.000088765446,0.00007321468,0.0018091244,0.0038996078,0.00046663155,0.00006546669,0.0033529534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006103921,0.00006794152,0.00004552564,0.00038164094,0.00007354189,0.004412177,0.000038704984,0.00046972188,0.0006418156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005404684,0.000043389842,0.000108464876,0.0000031069474,0.0000090455715,0.0000011612728,0.008498699,0.000010977053,0.000021471742,0.91671157,0.06176297,0.012823725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010282833,0.000019182646,0.00026874093,0.000025952779,0.000027021302,0.000011956749,0.0051426995,0.000010741987,0.000071798466,0.058786664,0.93543124,0.00010119556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022000436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08251381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9505393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082576735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030653484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188339016","doi":"","title":"Accountability and records appraisal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Variety (cybernetics); Perspective (graphical); Politics; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04629311204155685,"score_gpt":0.3871044488198349,"score_spread":0.3408113367782781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W188339016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92605376,0.00035827837,0.00019152655,0.013534537,0.0028242643,0.00016851029,0.0000059216327,0.00014952668,0.05671366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99373275,0.00017057106,0.002150296,0.00084301527,0.0017354493,0.000015090896,0.000009118715,0.000019478994,0.001324213],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804324,0.00044390603,0.0003656147,0.0002452791,0.00036276042,0.00053917355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795455,0.0010999878,0.00020167585,0.00023862801,0.00022962835,0.00027555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034141229,0.0001556858,0.00017720058,0.00015608492,0.0012875358,0.00039982458,0.00023103299,0.00014233301,0.000275684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002639769,0.00015050554,0.0000627112,0.0006143353,0.00026164207,0.0016345483,0.000048990976,0.00062909274,0.00010454816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008579266,0.0008681561,0.36240873,0.00004542394,0.00014061836,0.0000036207298,0.38122666,0.0000030854496,0.0031213372,0.17242625,0.0380502,0.04162013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025750775,0.000032822812,0.02798498,0.000030527244,0.000048882594,0.00002246925,0.028316628,0.000018945344,0.000381353,0.0015413512,0.9410118,0.0003527278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001930815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045516467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9029616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115013456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004585042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99028146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883554158","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4421","title":"LOOKING FOR QUALITY: THE EMPIRICAL DEBATE IN ACCESS TO JUSTICE RESEARCH","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; CONTEST; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5530687811844535,"score_gpt":0.6007818828052836,"score_spread":0.04771310162083009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883554158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45960438,0.000048497204,0.0009991059,0.39928266,0.0013069997,0.003307822,0.000019654877,0.000059368125,0.13537148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97617614,0.000019162759,0.001124126,0.017083623,0.0008994228,0.00066735025,0.000004847396,0.000025843905,0.0039994963],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970404,0.0006638727,0.00052682066,0.00034995758,0.0008348802,0.00058407494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245685,0.005346541,0.00016231588,0.00041035243,0.0013985841,0.00022535912],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005015777,0.00011681518,0.00021604658,0.0005243783,0.0007473363,0.001381671,0.0016878229,0.000119113916,0.0007830605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01687089,0.00009866351,0.000048732967,0.00282987,0.00020049144,0.0020969803,0.0003467244,0.0005197135,0.00026073807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039243666,0.0008349626,0.018222148,0.00064407673,0.00011008986,0.0000036764811,0.19318289,0.0013019387,0.0017181603,0.14277875,0.6069073,0.03390357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004091516,0.00008937766,0.16420251,0.00014890899,0.00019451018,5.084471e-7,0.04869923,0.0002707589,0.00039999466,0.0036768839,0.78155345,0.0003547083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01917818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060596196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51657176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019246271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010529443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1888207123","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1478722","title":"Law and Learning in an Era of Globalization","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.014542279891568078,"score_gpt":0.3538378165767485,"score_spread":0.3392955366851804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1888207123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87853694,0.00057039014,0.0011389026,0.040692843,0.00011256529,0.00007758124,1.9678545e-7,0.000021034173,0.07884955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829245,0.00076805655,0.00009453289,0.00049818173,0.00008688881,2.6776937e-7,0.0000011468494,0.0000016102487,0.00025685088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912685,0.00020934794,0.0001226081,0.000048613158,0.00011808655,0.00037451708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997233,0.000031616346,0.00009492756,0.000026582833,0.000093591516,0.000029973275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019116119,0.000027725848,0.000044962548,0.00003978842,0.00027964625,0.00007141996,0.00005874688,0.000032194395,0.000028594983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024046702,0.000028204782,0.000008880316,0.000297147,0.000038140864,0.0007163506,0.0000019721658,0.0012209669,0.000001208801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056394765,0.000034105837,0.0031677596,2.7576377e-7,0.0000020541916,1.0055306e-7,0.004122083,0.000026162958,0.00007173639,0.9699416,0.000007953757,0.022620538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004485163,0.00039440766,0.018969338,0.000018939565,0.000011272099,0.000026584652,0.04428076,0.000097941585,0.000027159122,0.8787756,0.05682331,0.00012616815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021436813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025233198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11975552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020896606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019507733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1895512462","doi":"","title":"Adding Color to the White Paper: Time for a Robust Reciprocal Relationship between Procedural Justice and Therapeutic Jurisprudence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Therapeutic jurisprudence; Jurisprudence; White (mutation); Procedural justice; Reciprocal; Economic Justice; White paper; Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.06558974602626799,"score_gpt":0.35974370216881124,"score_spread":0.29415395614254325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1895512462","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3142895,0.0015624714,0.025388444,0.6466362,0.0006125061,0.0016480847,0.000013767119,0.00011544417,0.009733594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855616,0.00022266158,0.001091853,0.002070382,0.0010722334,0.00005385673,0.000003175807,0.000013355382,0.009910891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981529,0.00020722496,0.00024183001,0.00015690718,0.00028148765,0.0009596531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983509,0.0010142282,0.00015908042,0.00009055321,0.00027509272,0.000110139226],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030232312,0.000092859525,0.00010294504,0.0000822675,0.0032397143,0.00017827898,0.00025573556,0.000078073324,0.00004524984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022491585,0.000071327784,0.000042108404,0.0006026963,0.000121367426,0.0005785243,0.000016077116,0.0013657279,0.00004976177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019944517,0.00010593343,0.04582792,0.000021020633,0.00015436459,9.01948e-7,0.073984794,0.00023006416,0.000073517534,0.8456475,0.015312141,0.018442407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011162644,0.0007806866,0.08407813,0.00006737785,0.0006193163,0.0004241042,0.071342215,0.00039191925,0.000008774044,0.0872855,0.75322545,0.00066025154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010849482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016725606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.758362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004746961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058148485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899744659","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1126","title":"From Liberal Extremity to Safe Mainstream? The Comparative Controversies of Witness Preparation in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Commentary on Evidence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Cross-examination; Mainstream; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Element (criminal law); Divergence (linguistics); Expert witness; Professional conduct; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.11921830649706305,"score_gpt":0.45123315576950046,"score_spread":0.3320148492724374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899744659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60383844,0.000033482145,0.00015943874,0.3903251,0.0005199766,0.00026441642,0.000039356186,0.000006725183,0.00481306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601749,0.00004672797,0.00012568026,0.039007466,0.0003385608,0.000039207724,0.000100913574,0.0000019158915,0.00016459158],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850035,0.0006172457,0.00021494829,0.000092483,0.00045487765,0.00012009943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421185,0.0052887104,0.00014508954,0.00014067035,0.000178567,0.000035131838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010408717,0.00006595036,0.00007355424,0.000089402936,0.00021510225,0.00009508142,0.00046641543,0.000021057866,0.00038660486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007766334,0.000044637483,0.000024412482,0.00040730918,0.00015929287,0.0010590832,0.0000340575,0.00018507855,0.00002859624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005308583,0.00059836585,0.106107906,0.0000022695338,0.0000749524,5.9544175e-7,0.44339243,0.001226125,0.00008484928,0.074878976,0.37239838,0.00070429227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032696663,0.00008177505,0.10534582,0.00014459314,0.00002209458,6.636224e-7,0.11644782,0.00054366677,0.00034267132,0.0044292384,0.77217114,0.00014356381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041967735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005796372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39977273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017553396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007085444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9644119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189986100","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001486","title":"Nurturing Commitment in the Legal Profession: Student Experiences with the Osgoode Public Interest Requirement","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Political science; Law; Public interest; Legal profession; Work (physics); Practice of law; Legal education; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09629140431203458,"score_gpt":0.43894372862530706,"score_spread":0.34265232431327247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189986100","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45493317,0.00007522349,0.00002784644,0.47638956,0.00043537663,0.00020692968,1.6956716e-7,0.000010874524,0.067920856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912196,0.000017444818,0.00005497968,0.007786,0.00053984934,0.000039361927,7.8232506e-7,0.0000027775345,0.00033919842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982321,0.0005927241,0.00023245411,0.000094643685,0.00058617897,0.00026189117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935126,0.00011674329,0.00019156272,0.00015880418,0.00011320343,0.0000684044],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002205674,0.000077249795,0.00006984413,0.000045403274,0.0023377286,0.0012625123,0.0006019006,0.00002749041,0.00027957078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045655397,0.000036902573,0.000027756594,0.00034695567,0.0002036472,0.0011724574,0.000021245727,0.00070642616,0.000011348957],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010650718,0.00024591852,0.00038863628,6.881945e-7,0.0000093271965,0.00001439503,0.36486173,0.0000011080903,0.000008108195,0.6236403,0.008309073,0.0025100864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001652989,0.00007648418,0.00441863,0.000025756432,0.000005498941,0.0000348922,0.5118575,0.0000012089058,0.000013697641,0.00072204287,0.4826179,0.00006107693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006933179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017226674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62291825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014653064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031560735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900282626","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v30i1.183345","title":"A Discussion of Autonomy in the Relationship Between the Law Society of Upper Canada and the University-Based Law Schools","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Legal education; Law; Premise; Legal profession; Sociology; Socialization; Professional responsibility; Political science; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Sociology of law; Social science","score_opus":0.029955283172055213,"score_gpt":0.30481013497787063,"score_spread":0.2748548518058154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1900282626","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32208776,0.00026132178,0.0000043814093,0.6532099,0.0002929896,0.00019642692,0.000011897999,0.0000010669498,0.023934249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929345,0.000005023315,0.00009438246,0.0036714745,0.00013209287,0.00000121372,0.0000035417256,0.0000022799468,0.0031554417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903136,0.00046027542,0.0002066075,0.00004289007,0.00016618868,0.0000926484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998688,0.0007400677,0.00021469881,0.00010719831,0.00016715542,0.000082871775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010530208,0.00003964718,0.00007396004,0.000035796027,0.0005858224,0.000054110726,0.00023478977,0.000037637317,0.00029273273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009899193,0.000020287132,0.000039498293,0.00046761407,0.00041771357,0.00030468398,0.0000017258578,0.00031489992,7.685289e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011029928,0.000020972724,0.32166356,0.000007466587,0.000015278027,1.9630416e-7,0.032707468,0.000031943215,7.1148435e-7,0.59881926,0.046075728,0.00064641086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014912737,0.000004529475,0.33126122,0.00002440133,0.000022210654,4.366001e-7,0.014238451,8.3994837e-7,0.0000015267052,0.0035979385,0.6506753,0.000024052628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9241245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8975995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6708468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003100109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017910993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98765653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905383749","doi":"","title":"Hard to know: what is hard knowledge?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Need to know; Data science; Computer security","score_opus":0.07902936040241831,"score_gpt":0.37909619969897246,"score_spread":0.30006683929655414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905383749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039531168,0.00058483396,0.00032709586,0.30482444,0.004866478,0.00079774205,0.0000028518023,0.00014413054,0.64892125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7436084,0.00022502858,0.0008294961,0.015069973,0.0014378767,0.00045349225,0.0000036008585,0.000013667949,0.23835844],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989387,0.00006850117,0.00017461108,0.00017719454,0.00022723053,0.00041379023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896574,0.00024013393,0.000055978286,0.00017033545,0.00028057402,0.00028723592],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022835105,0.00006375667,0.00007228275,0.0001410261,0.00039299924,0.00055410375,0.00020860696,0.00006904772,0.0007086321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011686438,0.00006610469,0.000036256784,0.0010102662,0.000065418775,0.0013433855,0.000025918771,0.00016975237,0.0013936993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007579075,0.00007838595,0.0011581833,0.0000023280338,0.000008163833,5.075178e-7,0.028763555,1.10570674e-7,0.000012040462,0.02708781,0.26412475,0.6787566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054616503,0.0000024881267,0.12733188,0.0000032372047,0.000005237931,2.681557e-7,0.0070079477,1.8198637e-7,0.00021139397,0.00034896794,0.86495167,0.0000820855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065377506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013079034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70407724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016320043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025532275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1922350498","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1029","title":"Convergence of Law and Policy and the Role of the Attorney General","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Amateur; Political science; Officer; Government (linguistics); Convergence (economics); Position (finance); Christian ministry; Business; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04837447085377377,"score_gpt":0.35926071848747154,"score_spread":0.31088624763369777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1922350498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056158663,0.12228824,0.0000020601044,0.18225552,0.00021648295,0.000612829,0.0000127201165,0.0000102112945,0.68898606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93097013,0.058809523,0.00005170089,0.008950041,0.00010653645,0.0000110097035,4.660329e-7,0.000003002243,0.0010975634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918544,0.00029237932,0.00019706503,0.00007124898,0.00017117418,0.00008267007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993089,0.00018589702,0.00015195557,0.00017194242,0.00014992569,0.000031397754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078601995,0.000044983764,0.00013425009,0.0000074649834,0.00025617343,0.000023501105,0.0001583769,0.00002341142,0.00048464906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005508257,0.000025686468,0.000036533387,0.00025892397,0.0009465694,0.00017605524,0.00003431431,0.00008948177,0.0000059204426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.366185e-7,0.0000112135995,0.0002370123,0.00007278673,0.000006690783,1.2739263e-8,0.0018418998,5.246412e-8,0.000023830346,0.9952305,0.0014602789,0.0011148973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000790936,0.000003566509,0.00016324957,0.00013283586,0.00002977895,0.0000010436959,0.00012491572,0.000010766232,0.000050877316,0.005970196,0.9934026,0.000031062587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016395789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015097549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99194235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010759963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009910407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926853064","doi":"10.1007/s10833-008-9097-3","title":"Considering the ethical potential of professional communities","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Educational Change","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.2463512642464355,"score_gpt":0.4575197047618218,"score_spread":0.2111684405153863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926853064","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47237894,0.00027297114,0.000015227943,0.51750135,0.0024661885,0.000090612084,0.000003990607,0.000002392383,0.007268335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929778,0.00018045823,0.00054328144,0.003095434,0.001923298,0.000008773941,0.0000032395512,0.0000036743816,0.0012640677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987171,0.00036093936,0.00031426048,0.000028678718,0.00048518606,0.00009380014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970385,0.0014057287,0.0004443276,0.00007791777,0.0009773042,0.00005621148],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011646058,0.000043736094,0.000090912356,0.000104950755,0.00076006085,0.000025119269,0.00022727561,0.00007803217,0.0019241871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011477654,0.000031283344,0.000061137645,0.0002514535,0.00047885644,0.0004195033,0.000019866293,0.000738078,0.0000093332865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057932804,0.000712702,0.023272937,0.000020495321,0.00007907528,0.0000024217995,0.3540135,0.000012715339,0.00019635046,0.5027034,0.118268795,0.0006596293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036502647,0.000079808924,0.23397513,0.00011955474,0.00004583657,0.000310002,0.15495774,0.0000123349955,0.00008571456,0.016874295,0.59302604,0.00014849701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013328926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003192057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5205988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052119463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026652236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1929795980","doi":"","title":"Depending on the Kindness of Strangers: Access to Civil Justice in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Obligation; Kindness; Economic Justice; Legal service; Political science; Law; Legal profession; Public relations","score_opus":0.0696123842958125,"score_gpt":0.31754488804513964,"score_spread":0.24793250374932713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1929795980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109522,0.0000047229,0.00004552502,0.034651086,0.00038455232,0.00020967597,0.000016571064,0.000009744701,0.05372594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979995,0.000005991074,0.00009448921,0.0010998978,0.00006001236,6.159732e-7,0.000003817769,0.0000065173213,0.0007291447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983146,0.00047867178,0.00016171345,0.00020320705,0.0005819114,0.00025987186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816406,0.0009896775,0.00021350697,0.00027273255,0.00022575613,0.00013424113],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015036522,0.000091309324,0.00016193555,0.0002207868,0.0006597301,0.00006475985,0.00092393626,0.00007925427,0.0012714389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015686481,0.00009693812,0.000043315846,0.0012591223,0.00012070583,0.0010023443,0.00010149236,0.0004277449,0.00002924723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055384624,0.00046303985,0.6984664,0.0001842535,0.00011983169,0.000021117638,0.09940002,0.0011750789,0.0024563884,0.17095675,0.016136076,0.010067196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006105015,0.00005773657,0.7876169,0.00016070447,0.00007921621,8.2895946e-7,0.08375132,0.000029290877,0.0010007961,0.000857517,0.12552871,0.00030645798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72549695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25504562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004928556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017239148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1931600816","doi":"","title":"The Law Professor as Public Citizen: Measuring Public Engagement in Canadian Common Law Schools","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.10679788982167389,"score_gpt":0.3745206995044524,"score_spread":0.2677228096827785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1931600816","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046235476,0.00089742575,0.000015114809,0.60376537,0.00084180513,0.0002918237,0.0000010038407,0.00003145903,0.34792054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99195325,0.00042459002,0.000017747032,0.0029970333,0.00043559232,0.000036421156,0.0000034964028,0.000013073821,0.004118811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950467,0.0012850661,0.00032695342,0.00013627033,0.0006087102,0.002596311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838036,0.00019162137,0.00017987004,0.00018525042,0.0005151334,0.00054774643],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020777347,0.000100163095,0.000104217754,0.0001762967,0.0032155057,0.0016570875,0.00061250234,0.000088753906,0.00008188346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002213119,0.000082865234,0.000041564843,0.00081906805,0.00015907819,0.0016412807,0.000029890194,0.0048550307,0.00014450161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049799005,0.000034263463,0.0018610655,6.0171544e-7,0.000029692163,0.0000015623764,0.003503257,8.812154e-7,0.0000017853927,0.99023324,0.00211003,0.0022186597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020356991,0.000027543865,0.000096490345,0.0000055831715,0.0000040255395,0.000015936022,0.05321764,0.0000023267398,0.0000026329196,0.31753272,0.62881327,0.00007825846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6510358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94571775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060698176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064967975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1931612596","doi":"","title":"캐나다의 로-스쿨에 대한 고찰","year":2005,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"행정법연구","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Law; Curriculum; Political science; Educational institution; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.05358897449868403,"score_gpt":0.41630600434395887,"score_spread":0.3627170298452748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1931612596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041661467,0.00028054384,0.000062952226,0.3878633,0.0023048937,0.00017310068,0.000010300418,0.000086194384,0.5675573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86928844,0.00016450376,0.0011318644,0.009399392,0.0027155257,0.000011276435,0.00000992116,0.000012475819,0.11726657],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856925,0.0001835257,0.00029292802,0.0002329339,0.00037472293,0.00034665517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891365,0.000269923,0.00017522757,0.0002572244,0.0002201365,0.00016383498],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007125858,0.00012055491,0.000120180484,0.0000862574,0.0007126481,0.0003985825,0.0002894291,0.0001523409,0.018956482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000716058,0.00012701353,0.00006532776,0.00094082404,0.00019315703,0.0012021777,0.00003182953,0.00046705527,0.010478937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011952718,0.0005872925,0.0046291146,0.00001361299,0.00004532637,0.000003092344,0.076951936,0.000022826749,0.00011975768,0.2951626,0.4519106,0.17054193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001340371,0.000019882875,0.0057522203,0.000010559468,0.000024762912,0.0000019819781,0.008017115,0.000048689846,0.000065568136,0.00074750243,0.98500854,0.00016913736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052892813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046961373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.827627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015909954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013334476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99029154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935262925","doi":"","title":"Book Review of \"Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2nd ed.)\"","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Encyclopedia; Engineering ethics; Professional ethics; Information ethics; Sociology; Library science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.038835631101764086,"score_gpt":0.3777036756794595,"score_spread":0.3388680445776954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935262925","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002075733,0.9225479,0.002853685,0.028729595,0.0013096131,0.00014050139,0.000008467449,0.0000027602357,0.042331792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061863223,0.975694,0.00025709116,0.016546257,0.00040051484,0.0000010105249,8.128158e-7,0.000006579209,0.00090743485],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910575,0.000108474735,0.00037026842,0.000042841653,0.00021877099,0.00015391875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841,0.00029642927,0.00045782526,0.000081158905,0.00046813407,0.00028647482],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025308537,0.000054571356,0.00016495035,0.00011750352,0.00016537671,0.00002089484,0.00011657934,0.000080595535,0.0018297229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028531755,0.000050632436,0.000041921863,0.00025982948,0.00017617077,0.00024805608,4.0393964e-8,0.0003535923,0.000002613984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000375813,0.00006512054,0.00045770317,0.00051368383,0.00008375838,6.282311e-7,0.19443946,0.000002909521,0.00004504442,0.11381059,0.6685233,0.02202021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010143717,0.000019631232,0.00004150876,0.000516684,0.000018119626,0.0000030831973,0.00039362416,2.0459606e-7,0.000014630193,0.004285858,0.9945528,0.000052405423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015074882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019413002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3260295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010894226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014039051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1936306142","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1951912","title":"Positivism and the Separation of Law and Jurisprudence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal positivism; Positivism; Law; Political science; Separation (statistics); Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Computer science","score_opus":0.025938667506056105,"score_gpt":0.3549935766101529,"score_spread":0.3290549091040968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1936306142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31538868,0.0030186942,0.0028907286,0.049948595,0.00029948403,0.00024564215,8.5487414e-7,0.00001720042,0.6281901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99589264,0.0021543978,0.0000780655,0.00038611947,0.00007288959,0.0000017181277,1.5229914e-7,0.0000019081751,0.0014121167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992909,0.0001719945,0.000103449886,0.00004466656,0.000109592496,0.00027943047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961984,0.00011208735,0.00011125394,0.000037971546,0.00009475952,0.000024066736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023877055,0.000029242701,0.000046855886,0.00002322935,0.0004510373,0.000056233494,0.00006554734,0.000024221403,0.00002337713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013295104,0.000020277299,0.000012412272,0.00009699796,0.0003344061,0.00044726024,0.00000748376,0.0005380512,0.0000018912871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021129275,0.000011152425,0.00027301747,4.9625993e-7,0.000012962133,5.6275947e-8,0.016398443,4.0290296e-8,0.000028446979,0.9805211,0.000026329944,0.002706864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004585854,0.00007375464,0.0024858252,0.0000068054123,0.00003458116,0.00006495635,0.016591758,0.000008608612,0.00010956601,0.95272285,0.027381005,0.00006169604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038532838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055321674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68050396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050072747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011633454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5825038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941135740","doi":"","title":"The Good, the Right, and the Lawyer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Vision; Law; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Pluralism (philosophy); Legal ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028957116607464695,"score_gpt":0.3770222863005822,"score_spread":0.3480651696931175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941135740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018294646,0.00018583474,0.000015690992,0.40400693,0.0003833608,0.00008553196,1.580617e-7,0.0000098096225,0.5934832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92015874,0.000113569426,0.000030287682,0.0062735765,0.00045531476,0.000018043946,1.8860462e-7,0.0000015013248,0.0729488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993839,0.0002720715,0.000061623905,0.000030769097,0.00012697408,0.00012461515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979796,0.0017925042,0.00003547355,0.00011521179,0.00004982651,0.000027414282],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024345298,0.000024727746,0.000021858437,0.0000045101315,0.0023711363,0.00029103967,0.0001460509,0.000017573715,0.00078072184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061667216,0.000007891361,0.000013421966,0.0001777461,0.0005275711,0.00033897272,0.000017254437,0.00013298841,0.00014290684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001706153,0.0000060825973,0.0005046454,9.021112e-8,0.0000039031534,4.1822825e-9,0.014418139,1.6177271e-8,5.266207e-7,0.93656534,0.0467416,0.0017579299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056546764,7.7215424e-7,0.0026978818,2.4650484e-7,0.0000056863496,4.5430025e-7,0.012899178,0.0000023243617,0.0000049138102,0.008427866,0.9758862,0.000017889171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029932447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003398679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9291446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008858031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008793829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W194334780","doi":"","title":"Regulating Legal Competence","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Accounting; Psychology; Business; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07439553631631018,"score_gpt":0.45728065463322415,"score_spread":0.38288511831691396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W194334780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11906855,0.000019232497,0.00033500514,0.13043278,0.0003117876,0.00005004309,1.1101568e-7,0.000076589815,0.7497059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9016672,0.000015379977,0.0018542773,0.0010806276,0.00029712322,0.0000034376255,0.0000011542743,0.0000031615823,0.09507765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947643,0.00007344896,0.00007068427,0.000077952456,0.00016323272,0.00013826264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957603,0.00012789918,0.000051480045,0.00009317903,0.0000998355,0.000051600055],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037423955,0.000032263648,0.000037287915,0.00003097337,0.00047191032,0.00014384315,0.00009626236,0.000027092909,0.0015089372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006070712,0.000033824952,0.000013903708,0.00047791435,0.000079161175,0.0004374655,0.00000953571,0.00012689791,0.00024323109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044880207,0.0000350412,0.003833668,0.000001242986,0.0000036699912,0.0000025430647,0.04582173,0.000011582452,0.00038503052,0.9249752,0.018208161,0.006717616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041468586,0.0000039163683,0.0022123277,0.0000035817145,0.0000019874021,0.0000024924634,0.02229327,0.0000320347,0.00003978709,0.0006252466,0.9746944,0.00004950522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011778024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001994579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9564862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042280062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029946346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945393226","doi":"","title":"Testing Theory and Debunking Stereotypes: Lawyers' Views on the Practice of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Anecdote; Perspective (graphical); Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Private practice; Corporate governance; Law; Ethical code; Sample (material); Political science; Sociology; Management; Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.04222516517689316,"score_gpt":0.37527332252974277,"score_spread":0.3330481573528496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945393226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06411463,0.0022334685,0.0007719777,0.23846072,0.00025876495,0.00022696398,7.577491e-7,0.000029901432,0.6939028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99308455,0.0006198967,0.00047940377,0.0041594445,0.00041505625,0.0000026869611,1.9380802e-7,0.000006319291,0.0012324715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998139,0.00079850026,0.00019879585,0.00007763608,0.00023495642,0.0005510646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610424,0.0032519794,0.000296506,0.00008865505,0.0002234592,0.000035175937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010867378,0.000057683323,0.00006766898,0.000040974443,0.00090533745,0.0001444425,0.00016339913,0.000035843063,0.000080785576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005405475,0.000040062114,0.000024037534,0.00025085403,0.00015000578,0.0007423738,0.00001205317,0.0014205546,0.000019414301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021998092,0.00004133812,0.00005791251,8.4117335e-7,0.00002660493,1.16631846e-7,0.008426772,0.000003634881,0.00005801872,0.9591356,0.0001106039,0.032116562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011387503,0.00008175628,0.000056135366,0.000025012268,0.00003177662,0.000046292407,0.045573935,0.0000061657815,0.00004034409,0.21582973,0.7381293,0.00006565696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008029353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040480467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9289699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024376715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021361946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69632155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951415956","doi":"","title":"Issues and Challenges in Training Needs Assessment (TNA): Judicial Education in a Rule of Law Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Competence (human resources); Tribunal; Judicial review; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.057839958448029145,"score_gpt":0.40839155889205886,"score_spread":0.3505516004440297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1951415956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6497655,0.008169544,0.000020061872,0.1767696,0.00024628584,0.00022368247,3.081662e-7,0.000008709209,0.16479631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98530364,0.013612062,0.00019395878,0.0001438566,0.00025037897,0.00001644169,5.565589e-7,0.000004863631,0.00047424107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987493,0.00023173245,0.00020821547,0.00008679659,0.00018039379,0.00054354616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994689,0.00009802091,0.00013813998,0.0000457735,0.00020957875,0.000039576993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020697229,0.000056525776,0.00010936907,0.00026693984,0.00016307729,0.000078355195,0.00009254055,0.000054269127,0.00008019722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022289583,0.000057460948,0.000018067589,0.00034006912,0.000100193814,0.00082270306,0.00000804078,0.0010494455,0.0000035463843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031526192,0.000118677686,0.0016276732,0.0000019121328,0.000009316271,6.56496e-8,0.08298622,7.3182565e-7,0.000043690135,0.8788426,0.000017273249,0.036348686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014833813,0.000046807323,0.0135177765,0.000018494735,0.0000036345048,0.0000058669093,0.52776426,0.000005022173,0.0000026644643,0.4525511,0.0058865896,0.000049426755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061117664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087458424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44477805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009544315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011117142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953461327","doi":"","title":"Write Me a Memo","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal writing; Punctuation; Rubric; Action (physics); Style (visual arts); Spelling; Grammar; Computer science; Law; Political science; Psychology; Legal research; Linguistics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.014514741084088338,"score_gpt":0.3546276164529646,"score_spread":0.34011287536887624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953461327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28270307,0.00037583022,0.0017277157,0.3034454,0.003926095,0.00017685787,0.0000017458995,0.0001082063,0.40753508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972973,0.0006295237,0.00023337969,0.00072446076,0.0014248213,0.0000031654977,0.0000013508771,0.0000074186937,0.02400288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998265,0.000105570114,0.00015060474,0.00008291629,0.00026619236,0.0011296878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993901,0.000097698925,0.000116102936,0.00009593368,0.00020535424,0.000094783296],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035862883,0.000054010008,0.00005745082,0.000088434404,0.00089125667,0.00024059175,0.00024066895,0.000072464536,0.0010214875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090262096,0.000050294282,0.000045900422,0.0003805014,0.0000899516,0.0007080878,0.0000087432745,0.0040720385,0.00022984136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037073785,0.00003427483,0.0005137348,2.6409307e-7,0.000017295193,3.2656854e-7,0.0026670943,1.9981155e-7,0.0008993436,0.98177105,0.0013653183,0.012727381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010633289,0.000019356969,0.00018337366,0.000001149125,0.000008711892,0.00005519242,0.01059695,0.000002538815,0.000023582155,0.27629295,0.71264374,0.00006611088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013126173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038901735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71127844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026516296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011364382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954421527","doi":"10.22024/unikent/03/fal.84","title":"'Don't Read the Comments!' Reflections on Writing and Publishing Feminist Socio-Legal Research as a Young Scholar","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Scope (computer science); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Section (typography); Product (mathematics); Media studies; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10926370531188222,"score_gpt":0.4356540884666846,"score_spread":0.32639038315480234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1954421527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1172864,0.000081008344,0.0000038145492,0.26167408,0.00048399388,0.00039404965,0.0000057771463,0.00008453162,0.61998636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96602774,0.00007237314,0.00054049114,0.012868128,0.0010562496,0.00020770024,0.000013278974,0.000019524141,0.019194514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965931,0.0013222577,0.00031605235,0.00032944305,0.0008978114,0.00054130855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685967,0.0015743533,0.00013796525,0.0003881688,0.0007620072,0.00027785136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007081293,0.000119356686,0.00011522635,0.00013448467,0.009326335,0.010798827,0.0005134392,0.00016903225,0.00246772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009925359,0.00010148351,0.000044542154,0.0011757527,0.00060353574,0.005467714,0.00012639468,0.0029166385,0.00096551026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071575732,0.000089026114,0.0024146985,0.000004789325,0.00001975266,0.0000015803856,0.012917567,4.2032752e-7,0.00015438683,0.8597744,0.12291534,0.0017008472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016138756,0.00004201181,0.0021214995,0.000035690646,0.0000075402577,0.000006844581,0.095773324,0.00000376786,0.000024655676,0.011938483,0.8897679,0.000116898394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16531259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016750135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84874135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032323098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007556906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957243631","doi":"","title":"A new expectation for post-secondary librarians: faculty status, collective agreements, and the online evidence of teaching","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Mathematics education; Psychology; Medical education; Computer science; Library science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.07316290212598249,"score_gpt":0.3462626030938979,"score_spread":0.2730997009679154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957243631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23829372,0.01575147,0.0061722873,0.07317486,0.0060050283,0.009117651,0.0012358,0.0003046551,0.64994454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39380494,0.005324883,0.03937586,0.0004389427,0.0016212196,0.000023726037,0.0009984192,0.000065543056,0.55834645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980506,0.00035823806,0.00036209798,0.0003283754,0.00069119217,0.0002095494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554116,0.0010570849,0.0014606726,0.0002365177,0.0015976323,0.00010694416],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007719785,0.0001729643,0.0004129822,0.00019621904,0.0025487456,0.00023657815,0.00041821462,0.00023290206,0.00033715653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002532407,0.00016863685,0.00017485292,0.0004473205,0.00044749497,0.0022555862,0.00015523452,0.0005038085,0.0000016846774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089085975,0.00040483172,0.0013343423,0.00056453637,0.00084593194,0.0000044226667,0.4125109,0.0000035197952,0.00073587074,0.0099553745,0.5448542,0.027895184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009483794,0.00019005085,0.009377543,0.0003283528,0.0002651553,0.0000060217476,0.24452956,0.000022880036,0.00002902131,0.00028575966,0.74378735,0.00022990388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15865804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066152476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19893314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047436976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014696628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957419446","doi":"10.7202/1032811ar","title":"L’enseignement du droit aux « non-initiés » : le cas des sciences de l’information","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Information science; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.1089571088983554,"score_gpt":0.4437733307470572,"score_spread":0.3348162218487018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957419446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10888012,0.0019753422,0.03020908,0.1748795,0.002612066,0.0005857988,0.000034769495,0.00015834047,0.68066496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95912963,0.0050809695,0.013335872,0.010484411,0.00049674156,0.000099454126,0.00009677082,0.000015955387,0.011260176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743783,0.0005207052,0.00054969714,0.00022253125,0.0008031928,0.00046606074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782664,0.00032519174,0.00042257644,0.00014604413,0.0009876951,0.00029188552],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037211687,0.00018602694,0.00015631823,0.0015778927,0.0017964476,0.007222851,0.00030375403,0.00013289595,0.0042584124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010940371,0.00021270291,0.000065367516,0.0067488765,0.0014955279,0.050616916,0.00005221315,0.00026241038,0.0007091609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013615151,0.00018353663,0.0023923225,0.000033106488,0.000026949465,0.0000017250346,0.1462465,0.00022076798,0.000026883661,0.67606044,0.16918443,0.005609743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008063215,0.00027745243,0.0059558386,0.00008203107,0.000053856882,0.000020397109,0.13626978,0.0006932629,0.00065057806,0.20272572,0.6521045,0.0003602521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0766505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071563134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8502495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012121854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008220151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958633578","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1157886","title":"Bertha Wilson's Practice Years (1958-1975): Establishing a Research Practice and Founding a Research Department in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Practice research; Sociology; Library science; Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.11246976093954006,"score_gpt":0.454983057005886,"score_spread":0.34251329606634595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958633578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6612089,0.0040527913,0.00008807263,0.2561108,0.0008821804,0.0006641837,0.0000027412793,0.000021491383,0.0769688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98112077,0.014378381,0.0006272493,0.000707613,0.00064605876,0.000032015094,0.0000032604908,0.000019002748,0.0024656374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99026155,0.0038444013,0.0003703634,0.0003063471,0.0022239739,0.0029933406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907498,0.007126443,0.00021931542,0.00018739312,0.0014618832,0.00025516233],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03958711,0.00009739932,0.00014233816,0.0005443131,0.0027478905,0.0006702289,0.0004047958,0.0000892322,0.000045650875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03826893,0.00011103831,0.000022686725,0.002713481,0.00027027982,0.0044178683,0.00008403819,0.008773529,0.000021510634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003774603,0.00050063885,0.0132337315,0.000010201256,0.00016987525,0.00048350214,0.048912346,0.000023951106,0.000043189022,0.88009715,0.024771594,0.03137636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003201327,0.00009573008,0.0013787039,0.00002265753,0.000009491425,0.0007456519,0.2539287,0.000011900598,0.0000019847257,0.010222955,0.73314875,0.00011335977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9768024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99093306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8698742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014917631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12197897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964160311","doi":"10.2202/1934-2640.1264","title":"Teaching Law and Economics from a Positive Perspective: The Political Economy of Policy Design in University Curricula","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Sheffield","keywords":"Normative; Curriculum; Politics; Perspective (graphical); Public policy; Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Economics; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.023782101812486165,"score_gpt":0.3364086476631673,"score_spread":0.3126265458506811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964160311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14057174,0.00002660207,0.00013628,0.10387237,0.000042117328,0.00010625983,0.000057453824,0.000009023601,0.75517815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971062,0.000010901403,0.00041422143,0.002295665,0.00011404784,5.4144067e-7,0.0000020781624,0.0000013162354,0.000055016473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937034,0.00027707964,0.00008151748,0.00010409297,0.000036857928,0.00013014338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994662,0.0002927607,0.00005359752,0.00006514525,0.00006378433,0.000058527927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018959625,0.000042850286,0.00006878441,0.000026660118,0.0004233812,0.00003217281,0.00010668076,0.000038647566,0.000011742926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019413159,0.0000408549,0.000019722058,0.00016356209,0.00051193376,0.00032157678,0.000025329497,0.00013727808,0.000004426512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000918518,0.000043975357,0.0033175005,3.161015e-7,0.000007412698,0.0000016238608,0.009200644,0.000001954475,4.5814068e-7,0.98710144,0.00021711945,0.00009839455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051980594,0.000035102203,0.08039598,0.000012805116,0.000027422177,0.000012424123,0.17637831,0.00007980536,0.0000147712735,0.5878544,0.15446764,0.00020154506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4148029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076422947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8565345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006582999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081182376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.589094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965225627","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.2.93","title":"A Different Kind of Profession","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Management; Political science; Law; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.10493787927397605,"score_gpt":0.3799694554561572,"score_spread":0.2750315761821811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965225627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85529304,0.0001671638,0.00016839897,0.10568173,0.001257359,0.000056722438,0.0000010011083,0.000007667458,0.037366897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957363,0.000104048224,0.0012741701,0.0005870661,0.00062093115,8.0242626e-7,7.7967434e-7,0.000004568455,0.001671357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809515,0.0003028236,0.00047143322,0.000058230155,0.0009421829,0.00013015556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961498,0.00029303643,0.0008875684,0.00008835277,0.0024486028,0.00013266141],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003078065,0.000048640468,0.00013269702,0.0002977334,0.0005009746,0.0034913449,0.00041626225,0.00011200309,0.0002629715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0150776375,0.000037828715,0.0000673228,0.0006363941,0.00008729526,0.070433155,0.000031368258,0.0014128116,0.0000033299227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012203662,0.0010837726,0.38717684,0.00003556233,0.00011916888,0.000033425462,0.21169949,0.000007371803,0.008113988,0.15784998,0.20879632,0.024962034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070884166,0.00010578799,0.22942613,0.00017786425,0.000029566558,0.000056765424,0.03481248,0.0000029766509,0.00073638296,0.004436575,0.72937167,0.00013496033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005155558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006796941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52057534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113070055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013997583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99754316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965340325","doi":"10.1007/s10979-009-9214-8","title":"Twenty-five years of Social Science in Law.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Sociology; Social science; History","score_opus":0.03453078653814621,"score_gpt":0.40324271784971416,"score_spread":0.36871193131156793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965340325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77721775,0.0000010141571,1.0517045e-7,0.0006223775,0.00023368985,0.00006512601,0.0000024067976,0.000007793459,0.22184974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981801,5.3638297e-7,0.00007174794,0.00031045667,0.00009137554,0.000009806892,0.0000014771794,0.0000022625532,0.0013322717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950516,0.000022346663,0.00010052183,0.00009179457,0.00016787603,0.00011228527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997395,0.0000263467,0.00005216,0.00006004168,0.00008470079,0.000037229212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047108636,0.00002777631,0.000051648814,0.00005217493,0.00058266154,0.00010383337,0.00012023739,0.000042038944,0.00043159278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036740395,0.00003162097,0.000011540548,0.00023087767,0.0016158486,0.00043564395,0.000019509458,0.00019693002,0.0000069797966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.4478405e-7,0.00008005888,0.004065348,7.935022e-7,2.587569e-7,4.6917077e-7,0.014618772,3.2708578e-9,0.0055244053,0.97502923,0.000055943816,0.0006240449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026441136,0.000023445034,0.52132076,0.0000041499197,0.000017614724,6.594304e-7,0.006863981,1.3430314e-7,0.00061505457,0.006544197,0.46421608,0.00012947647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015890764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031852648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96848506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015531985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015313957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9906625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965397099","doi":"10.5539/gjhs.v4n5p125","title":"Action Research on Group Consulting of Family Legal Education for Adolescent Parents in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Health Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Action (physics); Legal action; China; Psychology; Cognition; Medical education; Action research; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.2733284736204595,"score_gpt":0.5846829834982754,"score_spread":0.31135450987781593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965397099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97087646,0.0003268478,0.0002829569,0.017520279,0.0032677716,0.0003357719,0.0000038078535,0.000003879951,0.0073822364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767715,0.00011143109,0.0013270591,0.0005461686,0.00031075606,0.0000047866565,7.288896e-7,0.0000016756908,0.000020251558],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976261,0.00037054814,0.0005132454,0.00009594588,0.00096070225,0.00043343645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979851,0.000162962,0.0006061576,0.00007937839,0.0009606332,0.00020576226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017290259,0.00004460548,0.00011329404,0.00030935288,0.00081981113,0.000090960675,0.00029131904,0.00003265841,0.0000062088275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026193114,0.000040525974,0.00002621806,0.0020906788,0.000333442,0.0016382157,0.000016174145,0.00038146644,0.000003507015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018974212,0.0023605693,0.38338372,0.00010241287,0.0000043082923,1.966866e-7,0.009657011,0.000037099355,0.0005940735,0.3350854,0.009059334,0.25952613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027891414,0.00016663094,0.9066663,0.00023101307,0.0000019734196,0.000008299951,0.038561467,0.00001409966,0.000054681273,0.0010004273,0.052962404,0.000053808188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005693534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028306214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5232826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011999139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009303473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99631286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965587178","doi":"10.1017/s1472669607001661","title":"MOSSMAN, M. <i>The First Women Lawyers: a Comparative Study of Gender, Law and the Legal Professions</i> . Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2006. ISBN-13: 978-1-84113-590-8 (pbk.): £25.00. xi, 329 p.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05012152828082051,"score_gpt":0.34933175715525994,"score_spread":0.29921022887443943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965587178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02874474,0.000065025524,0.00094169646,0.06316329,0.0010346232,0.0034741687,0.000022880806,0.000117955584,0.9024356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97463614,0.000052684198,0.00018541132,0.014169704,0.00018452092,0.00030790694,0.000042265263,0.000008213312,0.010413183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970658,0.00031194312,0.0009668222,0.00018833362,0.0010090264,0.0004580961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772674,0.00044482137,0.0007969076,0.00042532966,0.00048076521,0.0001254607],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005721268,0.00019973505,0.0002576755,0.0002111371,0.0021694044,0.002391075,0.00060686655,0.000094527095,0.00043897703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026159527,0.00012380857,0.000052224783,0.0012427756,0.00052066694,0.010856712,0.00022286554,0.0006086926,0.000068695575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002755855,0.00033878462,0.00062868115,0.000047581263,0.00014657735,0.0000022709937,0.23668958,0.000065574946,1.3547452e-7,0.5831376,0.17765747,0.0010101779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014182433,0.00006038957,0.0024439178,0.000013382605,0.000034369656,0.0000017922041,0.31475732,0.00007251953,0.0000019364504,0.00046096268,0.6806189,0.000116286945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019345464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030975973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9458914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019568454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002327219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965994057","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2486","title":"Residential schools litigation and the legal profession","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Adversarial system; Legitimacy; Legal profession; Context (archaeology); Equity (law); Law; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.011547366703732291,"score_gpt":0.29239031262039017,"score_spread":0.28084294591665787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965994057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08671407,0.00017531072,0.001843677,0.16980246,0.0009522175,0.00017239318,0.0000014052034,0.00001952606,0.74031895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536496,0.00012812094,0.0006388226,0.0001860132,0.00024775474,3.7341056e-8,5.912607e-7,0.0000011964776,0.0034324995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919975,0.00043360703,0.00007161031,0.000043191772,0.0001838119,0.00006802196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942315,0.000121633755,0.00014826587,0.00005075159,0.00020099292,0.000055232587],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012353837,0.000025425032,0.000050495266,0.00000954481,0.0017174762,0.00011824104,0.00012048791,0.00003471085,0.00064740254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028035813,0.000020998394,0.000025422652,0.0000299564,0.00028114935,0.0015028126,0.000018944278,0.00020435073,0.0000046716864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058706817,0.00001142029,0.00020824173,0.0000014809821,0.000008004054,3.2148148e-7,0.0139431795,8.131864e-7,0.000028537357,0.97775036,0.005611885,0.0023770572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007761165,0.0000174627,0.0032239764,0.000020826661,0.000024102093,0.000004315013,0.06139621,0.000026595819,0.0000141416795,0.0062163915,0.92823905,0.000040823266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21297427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1689683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97153395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000843691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020574257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966854331","doi":"10.1111/j.1939-3938.2012.01139.x","title":"Writing for publication: What about case reports?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Forensic Nursing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic nursing; Audience measurement; Publishing; Perspective (graphical); Subject (documents); Editorial board; Psychology; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Forensic science; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Library science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.04588685543750574,"score_gpt":0.42846867816073025,"score_spread":0.3825818227232245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966854331","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014353644,0.0025614446,0.00061548,0.035839297,0.94961876,0.00024227446,0.0000094793495,0.00002032777,0.010949403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035797583,0.00032247583,0.0070194476,0.0002787487,0.9867516,0.000010357439,0.00006562466,0.000032744592,0.0019392265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997254,0.00016606192,0.0011306095,0.0001586235,0.0009200981,0.00037058513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98820865,0.002048997,0.0033022375,0.00021627061,0.0059956727,0.00022818103],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005190006,0.00015188896,0.00033094228,0.00033045333,0.00094614236,0.0018365382,0.00014824585,0.0004959266,0.00017065847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015650881,0.00015022581,0.00021955927,0.00046087155,0.00023436376,0.0053903274,0.0000082681645,0.0012008777,0.000004616931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014253708,0.00007021419,0.000005207242,0.000018420273,0.00003492839,0.00009612952,0.00848295,3.8343708e-7,0.0000015679918,0.0023677824,0.8863277,0.10258047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015714239,0.000037227266,0.00000350531,0.0008908829,0.00020069783,0.0018176255,0.020610591,0.0000010767096,0.000008687894,0.0019445786,0.9741719,0.00015611331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016869153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009941318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10242436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007160784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041464707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968222146","doi":"10.1111/medu.12706","title":"The birth of scenario‐oriented learning in ethics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.06981638957248594,"score_gpt":0.46315428656027535,"score_spread":0.3933378969877894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968222146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15052727,0.0002682692,0.0002458668,0.74233013,0.0032253284,0.00017144645,2.3675736e-7,0.00003830327,0.10319315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99026144,0.00011718056,0.0001743626,0.0027235975,0.000253946,0.000019649238,0.000006459297,0.0000033848614,0.006439968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983612,0.0005691186,0.000204085,0.00007124162,0.0006778569,0.00011654635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984034,0.0008140226,0.00011270323,0.00008444324,0.0004773712,0.00010807288],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053634485,0.00003132236,0.000048094284,0.00006387087,0.00029740258,0.00004061943,0.00014779963,0.00010977028,0.00021722501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08155208,0.000024173136,0.00001179423,0.0007912222,0.00025753718,0.00019614914,0.000012829189,0.0007725293,0.000031058342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016670267,0.00040997483,0.038313854,0.00000939249,0.0000045829483,2.1702411e-7,0.23241699,0.000008252835,0.000003766369,0.60628563,0.04808004,0.07445064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008507964,0.0000109218,0.0025565785,0.000020075951,0.0000015023296,3.1948136e-7,0.063909255,0.000069298374,0.000005247093,0.001626947,0.9316867,0.000028101716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011192498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073713395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8836066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011411843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019672561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969138315","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.1","title":"The Past, Present … and Future(?) of Judicial Ethics Education in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.046199851929390266,"score_gpt":0.3933745093764602,"score_spread":0.34717465744706993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969138315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03852491,0.00031737497,0.000007781283,0.89993656,0.001801098,0.00022709489,0.0000018261346,0.0000063293505,0.059177037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98814267,0.00067469536,0.00022472208,0.0065879202,0.0021555293,0.000034562403,0.0000033574427,0.000005299643,0.0021712293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985542,0.00051386224,0.00021227657,0.00009148303,0.00047577027,0.0001523938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968118,0.0022978033,0.00012702882,0.00012026414,0.00058043003,0.000062669686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001648122,0.000049891678,0.00006295439,0.000033981596,0.0006281363,0.00015385433,0.00015124581,0.00015850653,0.0000894703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013288017,0.00004052535,0.000010757094,0.00035316267,0.00024289583,0.00041497045,0.00002104108,0.0016901629,0.0000050286476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038766843,0.000036826015,0.0033419558,0.000016651922,0.000005193512,1.5947825e-7,0.036912117,0.000003422889,0.000011123773,0.87574726,0.049565237,0.034356195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003934125,0.0000048265915,0.021228448,0.000007957331,0.0000031628024,3.5954926e-7,0.03918248,0.000011490875,0.000009620993,0.008489574,0.93097407,0.00004866209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018426604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038696397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9667533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970439025","doi":"","title":"Courthouse Cancellations and Challenges to Self-Regulation: Correspondent’s Report from Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual misconduct; Law; Economic Justice; Misconduct; Political science; Queen (butterfly); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04677938013459182,"score_gpt":0.3035218410460404,"score_spread":0.2567424609114486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970439025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60586214,0.00744368,0.0018696976,0.26087788,0.003699175,0.0005404001,0.000019532448,0.0001407814,0.119546704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988957,0.0044758446,0.0005245556,0.0004165761,0.0005197254,0.0000069156504,0.0000041791077,0.000009920115,0.0050852713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984382,0.00014688727,0.00023033303,0.0001532367,0.0003324752,0.00069886574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991192,0.00012758996,0.0001844111,0.0001299687,0.0002709093,0.00016787623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013858994,0.00007565716,0.0000851396,0.000076135875,0.0007136043,0.000084759995,0.00014084682,0.00004936289,0.00040016542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003666383,0.00007812902,0.000018182842,0.00024280872,0.00003277019,0.00038207197,0.000013788692,0.00071989105,0.000012243967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074434414,0.00016233893,0.027121898,0.0000040580876,0.00027868617,0.00003359533,0.078016154,0.000018697665,0.00003562918,0.85358065,0.01236265,0.028311186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019282027,0.0000423942,0.05354307,0.000009040358,0.000042494445,0.00015160721,0.053277306,0.000007219704,0.000015079521,0.06185797,0.83066744,0.00019358576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8434511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99039793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8183048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012102029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025418177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9801068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970607549","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2005.tb02186.x","title":"Debating a whistle‐blower protection act for employees of the Government of Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Parliament; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Whistle blowing; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Public relations","score_opus":0.04215467431672612,"score_gpt":0.3064511432499956,"score_spread":0.2642964689332695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970607549","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26368132,0.000012765072,0.00052290875,0.66357225,0.00076088036,0.0010810867,0.00012553553,0.000012666054,0.07023057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99660283,7.218115e-7,0.0003227626,0.0004457726,0.00014433179,0.00005389643,0.0000059686113,0.000004198932,0.0024195379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991527,0.000058523376,0.00021274804,0.000078095305,0.0003431314,0.00015478925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999163,0.00007799776,0.00023029336,0.00011100178,0.00029941482,0.00011830961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039183465,0.000043165346,0.000053369407,0.000030756022,0.00046541498,0.000055349574,0.00012791614,0.00004596391,0.00022456088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022083842,0.00003972696,0.000025470279,0.00032558432,0.000058166745,0.00036533034,0.0000033644487,0.00007833252,2.8279513e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024768824,0.00015735363,0.008220997,0.00004844667,0.000042993623,2.0582671e-7,0.0061824755,0.000011835143,0.00069044466,0.87506187,0.060728274,0.048830327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070475755,0.000025929945,0.0027118654,0.000007704903,0.0000061980336,4.4031702e-7,0.0026168164,0.00006728308,0.0013623233,0.00013747407,0.9929415,0.000051987565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62825364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93221325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087704655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024696536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9808325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970966901","doi":"10.1089/glr.2008.12107","title":"Cameron's Rejection of a Duty of Care to Problem Gamblers: A Problematic Defense of Ontario's Gaming Industry","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Duty of care; Download; Law; Psychology; Business; Operations research; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06617364883818559,"score_gpt":0.3644845396834606,"score_spread":0.298310890845275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970966901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5474908,0.021617468,0.00026395638,0.013196929,0.0006222166,0.005499944,0.000025929483,0.000112156806,0.41117066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907413,0.0012056781,0.006500381,0.00046186332,0.000034692315,0.000078600104,0.00000577347,0.00001050527,0.0009612215],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998367,0.0002273121,0.0006926602,0.00016405464,0.00037583298,0.00017311612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981669,0.00013940709,0.0006815334,0.00024891732,0.00069025875,0.00007297014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009150464,0.00009997841,0.00040174686,0.00008436925,0.00019255212,0.000010771483,0.00016006458,0.00009489651,0.00028702046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076005666,0.000096923104,0.00009125939,0.0010171025,0.0001734092,0.00034529995,0.000028062315,0.00032254844,0.0000076623965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005615616,0.0008444157,0.01723646,0.04287008,0.00021942916,0.0000074610602,0.6400556,0.00009640941,0.0017628032,0.26117864,0.008331438,0.0273411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038036416,0.0002790822,0.0041937376,0.027126642,0.00033728193,0.000028034652,0.013164099,0.0000015351234,0.0010966597,0.00059837505,0.95237225,0.00042196366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19617525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08554256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9440408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027446478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019376597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9311439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971506959","doi":"10.3138/jvme.33.1.125","title":"Toward a Practice-Based Approach to Legal Education in the Veterinary Medical Curriculum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Veterinary Medical Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Veterinary education; Curriculum; Maltese; Veterinary medicine; State (computer science); Law; Medical education; Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.09089507058300111,"score_gpt":0.45576796987838514,"score_spread":0.364872899295384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971506959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4548134,0.00042578814,0.0020029389,0.44561157,0.00480777,0.0004992925,0.0000011464119,0.000024087436,0.091814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96979785,0.00006367719,0.0062679984,0.019871099,0.0034928245,0.00008787204,0.000022770519,0.000013159582,0.00038273248],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471045,0.0015591651,0.0008759935,0.00020659805,0.0023453473,0.0003024729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972017,0.0007664056,0.0005593964,0.00022439941,0.00082433916,0.00042376443],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064171203,0.0001480336,0.00021009546,0.00035888448,0.000292008,0.00020762897,0.0008275685,0.0002296172,0.0006169111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015700825,0.00011432509,0.00010144114,0.0013255923,0.00019336281,0.0014432388,0.000033866603,0.001111235,0.00003571893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061036076,0.03771608,0.003616483,0.00018321065,0.00004766686,0.00020241676,0.032972544,0.000070877744,0.00012179692,0.18115507,0.5115198,0.2317837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003566039,0.00046776334,0.007103739,0.00017921811,0.00002642488,0.0010271193,0.027331816,0.0000829144,0.0000016387736,0.00043508527,0.96284246,0.00014523443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006308329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014140361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5149845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004144029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035413254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99259037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972015922","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2012.694998","title":"International practice of Public Legal Education: a missing element in the justice system of Bangladesh","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Empowerment; Transformative learning; Relevance (law); Economic Justice; Element (criminal law); Public relations; Subject (documents); Political science; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Sociology; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.06442253769063168,"score_gpt":0.4049741958835994,"score_spread":0.34055165819296773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972015922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002467168,0.0003423982,0.00011676888,0.33681828,0.0013533605,0.00024587382,0.0000047853196,0.000011997406,0.6586394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99113,0.00004463221,0.0024705862,0.0052610035,0.00057459425,0.000045854355,0.00001577984,0.0000060694433,0.00045150288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974961,0.001166214,0.0005058285,0.000095049436,0.00049393764,0.00024282071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968795,0.0016990366,0.0005626753,0.0002269179,0.00054339104,0.00008844876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005526328,0.000068925794,0.00011734562,0.000095674885,0.00033240148,0.00012004379,0.00044231827,0.000056107885,0.0007047412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027313058,0.000060328515,0.00003231492,0.000504546,0.00016821848,0.0006080847,0.00003457325,0.00028932106,0.000040105675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011686857,0.0006536138,0.00084012875,0.00009887745,0.000009959187,1.9594549e-7,0.015196942,9.319519e-7,0.000006391983,0.9532322,0.026338233,0.0036108186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117115575,0.000012390846,0.0006204228,0.000048716563,0.000036628462,0.0000071484233,0.090661414,0.000005051475,0.000011817528,0.00003878762,0.9083897,0.000050814186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014179728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006111886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98866284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021841285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010260297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973016859","doi":"10.2307/3504568","title":"10.2307/3504568","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Morality; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.019616187019506064,"score_gpt":0.30347039371434975,"score_spread":0.2838542066948437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973016859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040689195,0.000007709954,3.799445e-7,0.034466855,0.000008560935,0.00009023452,0.000002651945,0.00008070908,0.964936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014704157,4.54442e-7,0.00013534886,0.00071328884,0.00025247398,0.000011283098,0.0000051983457,0.000004839494,0.9974067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946016,0.000067834226,0.00008683585,0.00008840514,0.00015556683,0.00014122091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960744,0.00009080466,0.000019404735,0.00010837752,0.000078868245,0.00009507354],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029394546,0.000038847185,0.000043999073,0.000043079945,0.00030169595,0.000121624886,0.0001305945,0.000033825363,0.9984729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002970351,0.00004096254,0.000017421653,0.00049529556,0.000040385356,0.00031716062,0.0000059917825,0.000086021675,0.9883459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064521846,0.0000327175,3.460659e-7,3.5668634e-7,0.0000027907454,2.8753792e-7,0.0008069617,0.0000036568015,0.000004291514,0.0005105914,0.53608835,0.4625432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035510784,0.0000133187,0.000042376516,0.0000018344784,0.0000035695039,3.519805e-7,0.00004408131,0.0000032731625,0.0000036590393,0.00004133125,0.99975026,0.00006045986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010748617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007936019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46366188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038412207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002499405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23204319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973468005","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00774.x","title":"New Problem-Solving Scholarship: An Historical Tale with a Happy Ending","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Adversarial system; Scholarship; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Philosophy of law; Negotiation theory; Quarter (Canadian coin); Epistemology; Psychology; Public relations; Social science; Law; Political science; Comparative law; History","score_opus":0.05375713648181519,"score_gpt":0.35540562041145257,"score_spread":0.3016484839296374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973468005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06979887,0.00046787417,0.165998,0.09711824,0.0046276236,0.000580071,0.0000013448056,0.0002628334,0.66114515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93423903,0.000028352402,0.055458367,0.00064435194,0.0009282367,0.0000035445664,0.000001974754,0.0000135574,0.008682598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850214,0.00041567584,0.00024104286,0.00012825034,0.00048049103,0.00023238329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883956,0.00013036671,0.0002867646,0.00009222544,0.00034193308,0.00030915378],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014835402,0.000075639335,0.000080111284,0.00015556286,0.0014009307,0.00079606584,0.0001405793,0.00006995945,0.0023315786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016517799,0.00006838537,0.000029341405,0.0006505642,0.000025098636,0.0034948997,0.0000038023302,0.0007182478,0.00003666476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036653564,0.00029005556,0.049822092,0.0000059664594,0.000044166798,0.000010997557,0.07462139,0.00014310026,0.0008515234,0.8153426,0.037848208,0.020983228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003083877,0.00007692735,0.0032458047,0.0000240275,0.000018844918,0.00008122,0.007155522,0.000008059964,0.0000624794,0.0058981883,0.9829767,0.00014388794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076412753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079863815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94512844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010752855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002712054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W197470741","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200000213","title":"Book Review - Jean McKenzie Leiper's <i>Bar Codes: Women in the Legal Profession</i> - [Jean McKenzie Leiper, Bar Codes: Women in the Legal Profession, UBC Press, Toronto, 2006, ISBN 978–0-7748-1320-4, pp. 242, $29.99]","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Bar (unit); Law; Political science; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.028694112820108496,"score_gpt":0.34755778768745355,"score_spread":0.31886367486734507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W197470741","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044218704,0.1882194,0.00005948724,0.48670515,0.005706553,0.0061309137,0.00020803462,0.00029678695,0.26845494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49001217,0.20317236,0.0002830855,0.20632164,0.0061823037,0.002119625,0.0001840345,0.0001989151,0.09152586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988372,0.0049959896,0.0018232221,0.0006411205,0.0021135018,0.0020541647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562395,0.0011080486,0.0011084055,0.0009733025,0.00059239543,0.000593912],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013212299,0.0005780129,0.00084275584,0.00011873412,0.004976616,0.0009933288,0.0023217709,0.000364404,0.012083102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015151036,0.00038155916,0.0002365365,0.0010120145,0.0009505972,0.006012517,0.0001675858,0.0035496103,0.00019365714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010648427,0.0008759419,0.00027400977,0.0001512468,0.000057420755,0.00015539967,0.12675858,0.000013265292,0.000019794807,0.027031807,0.84352833,0.0010277241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009670601,0.00013728908,0.0006700605,0.0007789586,0.0000405262,0.00021272566,0.07121009,0.000020720225,0.0000083606255,0.00051940436,0.9249418,0.00049302325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034084328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026486425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44579348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017505902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003926799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975677011","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342017","title":"Resurgence of the Traditional Justice System in Postcolonial Benin (Nigeria) Society","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sanctions; Harmonization; Political science; Human rights; Sociology; Social justice; Law; Relevance (law); Environmental ethics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.08622558257745999,"score_gpt":0.3601678112332124,"score_spread":0.2739422286557524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975677011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8354004,0.00072947465,0.00002415552,0.13317488,0.0028145215,0.00023189778,0.000010482702,0.000009036888,0.027605174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835825,0.000098016026,0.00045285412,0.00025979604,0.0004555105,0.000008517542,1.5883174e-7,0.0000033321392,0.00036354273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850816,0.00029483662,0.0004892461,0.00006701784,0.0004884293,0.00015233431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976156,0.0007736884,0.00058909226,0.00007100807,0.0009025567,0.000048059814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001362058,0.00006281421,0.00018876758,0.00005406627,0.00043530136,0.000060826176,0.00026143654,0.000035309986,0.00006697224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016353762,0.00004365175,0.00011843927,0.0007222514,0.0003923302,0.0007264161,0.000025707499,0.0003233682,0.000004717135],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083129125,0.00046939353,0.020385588,0.0001735356,0.00047062678,0.000010575705,0.32537574,0.00016617599,0.001344467,0.48055732,0.16951564,0.0014478216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050486415,0.00015147204,0.13384739,0.00026029654,0.00015317638,0.00003541888,0.73677754,0.000017240385,0.00014747755,0.002236589,0.12568556,0.00018295427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016238629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056658563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47832075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023190836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089964416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33480301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979517367","doi":"10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.019","title":"Ethical matters or the matter of ethics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching and Teacher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering ethics","score_opus":0.06264461585091227,"score_gpt":0.45137447738927383,"score_spread":0.38872986153836153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979517367","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2768407,0.0000089395835,0.00009199692,0.6921016,0.0007051252,0.00009106424,4.336782e-7,0.000022257813,0.030137915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94390595,0.000006281349,0.0016130693,0.034549236,0.00042925982,0.000016534374,0.000004051271,0.00000645096,0.019469151],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868315,0.0007761848,0.00014722747,0.00010150367,0.00019018422,0.00010176046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985753,0.0010086532,0.00010653431,0.00016232669,0.000097794255,0.000049365324],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046097427,0.000052223408,0.000055435867,0.000048922462,0.0009117698,0.00012768524,0.00013744137,0.00020732287,0.0011861583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027867022,0.000031122516,0.000017543269,0.00012692604,0.00028011345,0.00020969089,0.000012727281,0.00380037,0.000041178828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012410334,0.00031780096,0.017611567,0.000022415416,0.000011908577,4.507151e-8,0.41696462,1.9767685e-7,0.0007266677,0.32109225,0.1854457,0.057794437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040876617,0.0000061710684,0.03254235,0.000010707155,0.000015701144,0.0000030905503,0.026248291,0.0000036522788,0.000015651987,0.0029422126,0.938109,0.0000622902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019209625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016002451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7526633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017540433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011078914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984920196","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0015","title":"Defining Moments for Women as Lawyers: Reflections on Numerical Gender Equality","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender equality; Sociology; Mathematics; Gender studies; Calculus (dental); Medicine","score_opus":0.11300095921226927,"score_gpt":0.4067852068891015,"score_spread":0.29378424767683226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984920196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27658537,0.0002035319,0.0002579921,0.25785545,0.00094731373,0.0003134275,0.000033332442,0.000014884413,0.4637887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97685665,0.00003101546,0.00027825875,0.014086819,0.0004596039,0.00003773322,0.000002071143,0.000009816808,0.00823805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987565,0.0002611358,0.00029661384,0.000104604056,0.00014299272,0.00043813928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983369,0.0005513916,0.00023812565,0.000107960135,0.00018226527,0.0005833367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030014794,0.00008102343,0.00017949619,0.00012765377,0.0009421528,0.00031170066,0.00019224004,0.00006142347,0.00046120887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009885815,0.000068737434,0.00005960118,0.00028594895,0.00022781605,0.00048108486,0.0000066272937,0.00035541685,0.000028272207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054694425,0.000023733619,0.00011106664,0.0000044957055,0.00005099219,0.0000013254829,0.14741537,0.000027643506,0.0000010536631,0.84945863,0.0015153011,0.0013356655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068089034,0.00008510333,0.0002017097,0.000011805471,0.000010885987,0.000021129032,0.04202097,0.000009202688,0.000002937357,0.13751847,0.8193499,0.000087004206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009575494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031167004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8178346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011464086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018765298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986239576","doi":"10.1017/s1472669610000137","title":"Neteracy in Nova Scotia – Themes from the 2009 CALL/ACBD Conference","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Library science; The Internet; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Psychology; World Wide Web; Engineering; Computer science; Ethnology; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.028279893096006613,"score_gpt":0.34036274479015355,"score_spread":0.31208285169414696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986239576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03513342,0.000011309087,0.0017700978,0.15688893,0.0022072005,0.0006162824,0.000018229852,0.00007586614,0.8032787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862337,0.000016379638,0.0017145275,0.009007869,0.00017844587,0.00001834705,0.000065033106,0.0000028599522,0.0027628397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901986,0.00006983013,0.00031766878,0.00008162916,0.0003247142,0.0001862992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929214,0.00012377779,0.0001580098,0.0002341402,0.00014820225,0.000043750384],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005602198,0.00007761181,0.00006261189,0.00010271535,0.0002666591,0.0010293172,0.000369104,0.00005275923,0.0022321653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023598314,0.00006156146,0.0000240934,0.00051581534,0.0000829672,0.0047019734,0.000052813775,0.00041522924,0.0009906497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008412593,0.000040240997,0.0020719296,0.000005058734,0.000014813319,6.616564e-7,0.028708573,0.000041321862,0.000010656187,0.8433528,0.09229876,0.033446785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016887442,0.0000038549283,0.027007697,0.000008586433,0.0000066958673,1.8592446e-7,0.012728034,0.00025942575,0.000010964069,0.0018474353,0.9578708,0.000087443725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059547707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059127137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9511003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045956116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016563997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986878677","doi":"10.1353/utq.2010.0061","title":"Law, Mystery, and the Humanities: Collected Essays (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Postmodernism; Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.015928102347547615,"score_gpt":0.2703701816500301,"score_spread":0.25444207930248247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986878677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012132501,0.0008545943,0.000036609476,0.018702252,0.00041266737,0.00029499712,0.000008573349,0.000033684493,0.9675241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624036,0.0008899934,0.00037417677,0.0018810835,0.00012070981,8.762706e-7,0.000005818448,0.0000040481013,0.034319725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947387,0.0001631524,0.00007693134,0.00007445085,0.0001290279,0.00008256828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993216,0.00023016286,0.00010199616,0.00012508658,0.0001932429,0.00002790322],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045330383,0.000040980947,0.00009368706,0.0000096864405,0.0008610763,0.00005209119,0.00018453065,0.000039238155,0.0028330095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006942212,0.00003707488,0.000030881452,0.000054317523,0.0007949579,0.0005832653,0.00000814134,0.00011895031,0.000013193428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018095423,0.000029620016,0.000026300435,0.000021274116,0.000015971093,5.368998e-7,0.14194249,7.0044526e-9,0.000024918443,0.8253845,0.03013444,0.0024018772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036231137,0.000031747193,0.0004834944,0.000020866682,0.000031248746,7.571726e-7,0.06355486,0.0000033872425,6.8636643e-7,0.0006572505,0.93480265,0.000050738778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28676027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63391715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95027107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040127296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022008753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988556958","doi":"10.7202/1027999ar","title":"De la nécessité d’enseigner le droit civil et la common law dans les Facultés de droit au Canada","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02150915692891705,"score_gpt":0.31365031594694465,"score_spread":0.2921411590180276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988556958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40918425,0.0002688889,0.0008083852,0.038243704,0.00046481146,0.00016459532,0.00009472496,0.00006937341,0.55070126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9240209,0.00042705695,0.00068567204,0.0046454254,0.0008818349,0.000055089193,0.00009046992,0.000056049405,0.06913749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962043,0.0013727716,0.0005351435,0.00043588408,0.00042810294,0.0010238098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714243,0.0014039523,0.0003547529,0.00042477515,0.00019240018,0.0004816728],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022866363,0.00024780352,0.0003741776,0.00009189485,0.0012548644,0.0005286245,0.0006396708,0.0005036964,0.0008386362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053514214,0.00040261226,0.00015530482,0.0011334221,0.000753045,0.00091175444,0.00007003452,0.001267158,0.000069973714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017837829,0.00038825726,0.033145312,0.00009449413,0.00007625984,0.00025712154,0.034021016,0.0005115168,0.00027158647,0.91095287,0.012441204,0.007822544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040660723,0.000032356114,0.029750863,0.0001996895,0.000117289375,0.0004815045,0.0137525145,0.0005155186,0.00017314927,0.08144147,0.8726005,0.0005285589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96704555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9853899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8601593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003450355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010497147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988648967","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2012.681177","title":"Teaching without authority","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Constructive; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Function (biology); Legal profession; Demographics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Pedagogy; Process (computing); Computer science","score_opus":0.09048175909408541,"score_gpt":0.42972872178170785,"score_spread":0.33924696268762244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988648967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050763268,0.00004515357,0.0000834673,0.10240259,0.000594445,0.000081701364,3.8198903e-7,0.00008083158,0.84594816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9363082,0.000001339029,0.00038364306,0.0025902216,0.0014179159,0.000009465697,0.0000010044287,0.000005313639,0.059282914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893874,0.00054905587,0.00007870066,0.00005280716,0.00017125015,0.0002094401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995702,0.00012936821,0.000048738944,0.0001555582,0.000030715295,0.0000654581],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032303294,0.000042226966,0.000042824773,0.000010620452,0.0012333686,0.00010265791,0.00016903944,0.000044948483,0.0012045914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040875413,0.000029058641,0.000021452945,0.00011034035,0.00016075614,0.0007257326,0.000018443034,0.0005046829,0.00044179722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001236789,0.00005916003,0.005828123,5.0548374e-7,0.0000049654664,1.6466222e-8,0.074722014,5.8751876e-8,0.000019292698,0.9084611,0.0085620675,0.0023414914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031471154,0.0000017280836,0.002799751,0.0000013431978,0.0000101780415,5.025293e-7,0.009229675,0.000002495287,0.0000090217945,0.0043213703,0.98354304,0.000049414444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030912913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014933933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.974981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051645675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008602656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988796429","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.01.014","title":"Inter-disciplinary teaching strategies for mental health law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Discipline; Mental health; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Law; Psychiatry; Medicine; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.08647829579388691,"score_gpt":0.4776675216194935,"score_spread":0.39118922582560656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988796429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018493697,0.00071863754,0.0035379762,0.64031374,0.016312154,0.0001548457,0.00003442722,0.000018696885,0.32041585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789318,0.000034211203,0.00895065,0.009618911,0.001985455,0.0000022404174,0.000009497922,0.0000055860132,0.00046166847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991085,0.00013312347,0.0003027278,0.000065634675,0.00029096234,0.00009903795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990547,0.00009482445,0.00031885906,0.000038217066,0.00036091945,0.00013249852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015912255,0.000053181782,0.00008568924,0.00006359982,0.0004372937,0.00034596387,0.0002028613,0.000032969605,0.000033005206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007329011,0.000047282167,0.000049325292,0.000034442244,0.0001156115,0.0012132789,0.00001867736,0.00028119644,0.0000025155173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007291893,0.000105792904,0.00037074464,0.0000034501966,0.0000424857,3.9126604e-7,0.02373261,0.0000024923647,0.0000030412355,0.9345879,0.0399283,0.0011498969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000449109,0.00013201234,0.000054679054,0.000046433084,0.000004916509,0.000032729564,0.03971144,0.0000075031926,8.828213e-7,0.14854784,0.81096345,0.000048971906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020315603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033993134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009126835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014062796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3363354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989278777","doi":"","title":"Globalization and Legal Education: Views from the Outside-In","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Legal education; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Field (mathematics); Legal profession; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.032283077174279445,"score_gpt":0.35999713897604046,"score_spread":0.327714061801761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989278777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1601448,0.0014423381,0.00055934075,0.12684433,0.0024224976,0.0005028499,0.00001033878,0.000077084165,0.7079964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781654,0.000096915835,0.00092703284,0.013712532,0.001069707,0.000017877996,0.00002645792,0.0000068967674,0.005977168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989387,0.00019627271,0.0002579493,0.00017429775,0.00024191554,0.0001909006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990871,0.00035962646,0.00010776974,0.00019088508,0.00014188087,0.000112734575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014472713,0.000073407915,0.0000788268,0.000034805245,0.0005505647,0.00040433393,0.00018007899,0.00007726047,0.00085789396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009203693,0.00006198226,0.000021302096,0.00061629346,0.00014837862,0.0009758959,0.000020953392,0.0002516092,0.00018791005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069451175,0.00007067219,0.022492303,0.0000015515689,0.0000044527865,8.1274067e-7,0.0039552227,0.0000012124739,0.000023177352,0.944109,0.021160979,0.008173665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009925822,0.0000042674505,0.050661813,0.000014329222,0.0000067354626,9.937406e-7,0.007822174,0.0000020286711,0.000023952072,0.0072503323,0.93403524,0.00007886292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11086415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23814195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93685865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012786029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079820346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93933374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990719429","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0013","title":"Frank Iacobucci and the University of Toronto","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Friendship; Character (mathematics); Media studies; Sociology; Law; Political science; Art; Social science; Literature","score_opus":0.01291416203427385,"score_gpt":0.27374297899915906,"score_spread":0.2608288169648852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990719429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02707504,0.0013402307,0.0016432179,0.0077227587,0.00032614736,0.00009351633,0.0000043137443,0.0000103221855,0.9617845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388844,0.0016744614,0.0013136037,0.00008641843,0.000084294625,2.1459194e-9,4.617713e-7,0.000001672987,0.0029506572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937445,0.00015397092,0.000088025496,0.00005881304,0.00021082108,0.00011392951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991068,0.00023033883,0.00020910171,0.00008005458,0.00028253585,0.000091159614],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013618765,0.000039896582,0.000096823154,0.00000803355,0.0012913108,0.000021541693,0.00023773356,0.000046792957,0.0053744935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074785225,0.00003867232,0.000057846737,0.000036349364,0.0007048259,0.0011315997,0.000032289958,0.00014557573,0.000002714128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033658344,0.000076379976,0.00085826503,0.000004823097,0.00007059526,0.000007660074,0.13134687,0.0000017525891,0.00004644446,0.85367906,0.007388357,0.0061832177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079816143,0.000021317159,0.007359568,0.000008757385,0.00003788901,0.0000048637726,0.19433637,0.000004421366,0.0000064129636,0.0003190079,0.7970575,0.00004573301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6787529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.810642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9668134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002715873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021898224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993481130","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.109-4866","title":"US politics and ideology enter exam rooms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Cover (algebra); Politics; Ideology; Abortion; Bit (key); Law; Computer science; Medicine; Computer security; Political science; Surgery; Pregnancy; Engineering","score_opus":0.012073782299209452,"score_gpt":0.3116911707774581,"score_spread":0.29961738847824865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993481130","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14173512,0.000044679018,0.0002589066,0.6929319,0.0023858119,0.000056839865,0.0000046377995,0.000017957504,0.16256414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93286914,0.0000753217,0.00013588821,0.05942823,0.0026707065,0.0000022405986,0.000003104924,0.000005303161,0.0048100566],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823076,0.00049195765,0.00022339004,0.00007901753,0.0006207778,0.00035412272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997721,0.0004997713,0.00014479575,0.00004696622,0.0003818237,0.0012056174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031243796,0.000049124195,0.00008586583,0.00013047113,0.000830944,0.00023173649,0.00013100539,0.00024875026,0.0055685425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012861623,0.000049314305,0.000024087944,0.000195231,0.00009819273,0.0002888419,0.0000069194166,0.0008186329,0.000151145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011223788,0.000025516118,0.3082607,0.0000022725046,0.000042390835,0.000016286936,0.0072642136,8.1186727e-7,0.0000014917877,0.31020042,0.34182358,0.03236118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015550172,0.0000108925515,0.03884181,0.0000052474243,0.000006886761,0.00003256651,0.0012323337,0.00003425739,4.772785e-7,0.003576357,0.95604813,0.00005551512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05220656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26150095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.791134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052759954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043980526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993751475","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0012","title":"If Philosophical Legal Ethics is the Answer, What is the Question?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Closed-ended question; Political science","score_opus":0.03466443420024338,"score_gpt":0.35657622478657486,"score_spread":0.32191179058633146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993751475","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053721596,0.00018277254,0.00010588348,0.82789695,0.0016937746,0.00007548088,0.0000043099326,0.000011718794,0.16465694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98267025,0.0015301756,0.0005553487,0.009864647,0.0010586751,8.070443e-8,8.1929596e-7,0.000003734774,0.004316289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988249,0.00038140596,0.00010825526,0.000083544815,0.00046509455,0.00013680974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984832,0.0004782936,0.00018404148,0.00017898732,0.0005797988,0.00009570175],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019794442,0.00005625309,0.00006624916,0.000011325754,0.0039493367,0.00042405335,0.00055444695,0.00014626894,0.0068360073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002816588,0.00004030677,0.00008644759,0.00008029445,0.0008481094,0.0029342985,0.000037178546,0.0016107996,0.000027210996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013209583,0.000045955796,0.00009804167,0.0000010004261,0.000024296705,0.0000018467038,0.0772221,6.8174296e-7,0.00002396141,0.90290445,0.018027838,0.0016365955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010693753,0.000015581223,0.00058783044,0.000010198667,0.000029637968,0.000011613118,0.06461013,0.000009207206,0.000010621332,0.011305857,0.9232509,0.000051479947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16658121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26161847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9772981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011113247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075197546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993893059","doi":"10.1353/jsh.2000.0051","title":"Portia Ante Portas: Women and the Legal Profession in Europe, ca. 1870-1925","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social History","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019796480622737037,"score_gpt":0.32848989568217096,"score_spread":0.30869341505943393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993893059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71662545,0.0008711353,0.0000018389649,0.047056764,0.0012526012,0.00012213286,0.0000012970601,0.00000899277,0.2340598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94529474,0.00040689672,0.0000344201,0.0022294768,0.00069399754,0.000004201259,6.1374726e-7,0.000006553398,0.051329087],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986599,0.00042884593,0.00037941942,0.00006317937,0.00031231635,0.00015632236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991105,0.00011022804,0.0004000018,0.000045915145,0.0002694404,0.00006391753],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023979659,0.000054626376,0.0001458694,0.00009347668,0.000430375,0.000041499352,0.00014396962,0.000052049127,0.0027920033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050799066,0.00004085233,0.000033103493,0.00037450905,0.0004436185,0.00074004213,0.000007995445,0.00052863825,0.000021552454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004194134,0.00022517583,0.002266728,0.000009838546,0.000029363679,0.000053942924,0.49466434,0.0000012172117,0.0000503949,0.051076103,0.4340643,0.017139185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005081341,0.000016414297,0.0120514985,0.000009833321,0.000007851261,0.000007966871,0.014207012,7.199236e-7,5.134258e-7,0.0002965342,0.9728428,0.000050733328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017645078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071831746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5387785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056493835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00214787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994935465","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2011.566452","title":"Selling out: academic freedom and the corporate market","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Academic freedom; Higher education; Sociology; Media studies; Management; Political science; Economic history; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.14653237265222377,"score_gpt":0.4174404470687324,"score_spread":0.27090807441650866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994935465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08788816,0.00078814046,0.00037949285,0.38840327,0.0049205157,0.00024249258,0.000002139537,0.000015688267,0.5173601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97465366,0.001230452,0.0013651185,0.005110473,0.0034529301,0.0000048658285,4.3535772e-7,0.000006142068,0.014175927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990143,0.00030506315,0.00033285507,0.000050708222,0.00018686483,0.000110211186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806803,0.00032669748,0.0009119535,0.00008113594,0.0005031571,0.000109006556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023502917,0.000049720777,0.00008848577,0.00020297356,0.00033833826,0.00009110029,0.00019871452,0.000058755108,0.0005783778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002743377,0.000034849276,0.000035909707,0.00042828705,0.00030560058,0.000728221,0.000009741813,0.00044238564,0.000021225553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005588104,0.00007628762,0.0032036356,0.0000035730855,0.000021835422,1.5965765e-7,0.13648553,6.231499e-7,0.000015087424,0.733414,0.11977606,0.006947336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038349192,0.000018909963,0.016508814,0.000027356531,0.00004328228,0.000024250081,0.026692418,0.000009059875,0.000023645018,0.12654524,0.82964224,0.000081289196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033892123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012133361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8867655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007338344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040071835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71085715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996358293","doi":"10.1080/09627250408553648","title":"Problem-solving justice: responding to real problems, real people","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice Matters","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Accountability; Framing (construction); Economic Justice; Politics; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05590135572358874,"score_gpt":0.3840260932875483,"score_spread":0.32812473756395955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996358293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42642316,0.000019891699,0.0032985406,0.28021088,0.0024674125,0.0008998352,0.00001391627,0.00036645026,0.2862999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9550775,0.00019700237,0.020620776,0.014988223,0.0012923224,0.00011475163,0.000026367063,0.000052116957,0.007630889],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977753,0.00019332218,0.00041101594,0.00040083242,0.00058096176,0.00063856755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983859,0.0004500455,0.00020002695,0.00027730715,0.00035004131,0.0003366745],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001311636,0.00018600139,0.00018283015,0.0005404183,0.0015730981,0.0005813673,0.00041693085,0.000108715925,0.00037300895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010505726,0.00020175296,0.000054043074,0.0019510045,0.00013390403,0.0010133918,0.00007561951,0.00042767578,0.00069337233],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097259035,0.0002244357,0.00020635778,0.00087072264,0.000023409066,0.000020493726,0.532991,0.0016481254,0.005417566,0.41505635,0.041795403,0.0016488701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007054349,0.00018931145,0.0053809136,0.0003890905,0.0019594063,0.000026379224,0.70037,0.000020358879,0.0001548517,0.0029856903,0.28700784,0.00081071584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024573617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006619054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5286544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006008121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012309039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996805634","doi":"10.2118/0302-0012-jpt","title":"The Need for a Strong Code of Ethics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Petroleum Technology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Apache (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Computer science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Programming language; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10377978566447066,"score_gpt":0.4165130920353061,"score_spread":0.31273330637083546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996805634","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04801339,0.00076212396,0.0042701997,0.92849004,0.0010566585,0.00009563132,0.000005083201,0.000027637765,0.017279249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949655,0.00034526817,0.0019733028,0.00025250646,0.00018129195,0.00000469414,1.2123851e-7,0.0000042434276,0.0022731032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991831,0.00008551803,0.00033110732,0.00004080211,0.00021652438,0.0001429018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758905,0.0009976773,0.00059103355,0.00010465967,0.00069053733,0.000027055605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016889903,0.000037407663,0.00010565878,0.00020626013,0.00044398228,0.000038056427,0.00034265761,0.0001707717,0.00008192811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063245916,0.000027091679,0.000058429836,0.00042841124,0.0003563483,0.00018505094,0.000012492548,0.0007421337,0.0000041025355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020354233,0.000094580595,0.0010097387,0.0000050092594,0.00004519993,7.409411e-7,0.0040494017,0.000015190562,0.0006069046,0.9607186,0.021346487,0.01208784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023716588,0.00013084599,0.0000767992,0.000008547222,0.000019062567,0.0000091589945,0.018171914,0.00008786662,0.00022257301,0.011910725,0.9690939,0.00003141628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054853044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004741937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94880784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005581787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035457505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75715834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997688969","doi":"10.1080/14443050209387790","title":"Law: The search for community","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Australian Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Nature","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.5078833097919121,"score_gpt":0.5289148499308668,"score_spread":0.021031540138954696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997688969","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08956993,0.0004983656,0.000016216547,0.84084845,0.0014268572,0.0001806974,0.0000047958897,0.000010056798,0.06744465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980078,0.00029319813,0.00034019927,0.0010610896,0.0004886755,0.0000029069552,1.1657102e-7,0.0000023905156,0.017733416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991411,0.00032980915,0.00019231527,0.000021948175,0.00019955376,0.00011524953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979535,0.001041803,0.00015410285,0.00007454277,0.0007411019,0.00003497222],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002203578,0.000034859375,0.00008598282,0.000031875403,0.0016284519,0.000098976314,0.00020598253,0.000022100325,0.00016740928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009011681,0.000021843658,0.000055473545,0.0001956583,0.0003482443,0.0003677438,0.00001292199,0.0004480357,0.000014820052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000077672585,0.000111055786,0.00047261803,0.000010094593,0.00013946083,6.888308e-7,0.16278261,0.0000055828405,0.000019881896,0.19072062,0.643943,0.0017866357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009209789,0.000048979276,0.00065688574,0.0000098359915,0.000020951622,0.0000031501875,0.1752902,3.426639e-7,0.000055699104,0.0019016252,0.8218946,0.000025617916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000752632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008270422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89050806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005681845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063402964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999389045","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00666.x","title":"JUDICIAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Welfare; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06960463949241635,"score_gpt":0.41601493926083655,"score_spread":0.3464102997684202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999389045","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009116761,0.054944392,0.0013032301,0.5059938,0.001678738,0.00058596523,0.0000063104735,0.00014091586,0.43443498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37220168,0.48923546,0.0053279633,0.12140369,0.0032452096,0.00018325748,0.000085011845,0.000034412446,0.008283309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990668,0.00014077658,0.00020967095,0.000121586105,0.00029288905,0.00016827481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941856,0.00006409921,0.00010502454,0.00014833368,0.00019054172,0.00007346621],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010581365,0.000058802467,0.00011517684,0.0000342181,0.00044654592,0.00006633109,0.00014773404,0.000048328922,0.00033722512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010578037,0.000056235443,0.00005165187,0.0006505226,0.000087723936,0.0004383508,0.000012769565,0.00020966952,0.00089671405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002307438,0.00009872312,0.0000821755,0.00011762026,0.000011110205,0.0000022138624,0.0020820228,0.000004984838,0.000026402142,0.59714586,0.36885238,0.031574175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006824966,0.000008068432,0.0019171449,0.0005011409,0.000025022224,7.1449057e-7,0.00025543827,4.5642815e-7,9.610835e-7,0.0030725538,0.9940766,0.00007363686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045731217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000691339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62522423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016756612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010610708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999703210","doi":"10.1177/0964663905051225","title":"Corporatism and Legal Education in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatism; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Political science; Hierarchy; Power (physics); Period (music); Law; Relation (database); Space (punctuation); Sociology; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.04297319922867225,"score_gpt":0.4026846579921464,"score_spread":0.35971145876347416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999703210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5165426,0.0018884123,0.0000022178367,0.28476584,0.0010591125,0.00021885148,0.0000046546706,0.000029089246,0.1954892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854602,0.00025694276,0.0001541751,0.0031200533,0.0009928381,0.000029804209,0.000003429343,0.000005064671,0.009977449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991142,0.00012359169,0.00019304245,0.00013448136,0.00023905186,0.00019562639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994837,0.00012735635,0.00010056657,0.00004253252,0.00019747675,0.000048392318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032998723,0.00007565987,0.0001262914,0.00005128984,0.0008717401,0.00011916148,0.00007370344,0.000037597394,0.00007482515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045391102,0.00008049499,0.000014498337,0.0003911496,0.00017461895,0.0008602972,0.000023616889,0.0002234181,0.000011585771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006302856,0.00007084885,0.011504475,0.000007377142,0.00002753214,0.0000020253317,0.030352961,0.0000015372045,0.000007741943,0.7226755,0.14516576,0.090177946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008763703,0.000003931929,0.030984476,0.000005649275,0.000007065181,6.535846e-7,0.07513927,0.0000012850636,0.0000046281866,0.0010586648,0.8926125,0.00009422234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9759265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99808574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7474468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009908534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01127343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000174386","doi":"10.1177/000842980303200122","title":"Comptes rendus / Reviews of books: Consequentialism Stephen Darwall, editor Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. vii + 301 p. Contractarianism/ Contractualism Stephen Darwall, editor Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. vii + 286 p. Deontology Stephen Darwall, editor Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. vii + 242 p. Virtue Ethics Stephen Darwall, editor Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. vii + 261 p","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contractualism; Consequentialism; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07761036790258986,"score_gpt":0.39836073382874854,"score_spread":0.3207503659261587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000174386","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009002618,0.19769885,0.0027959265,0.03723281,0.59612477,0.026083011,0.0042254296,0.0025972093,0.124239355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02421148,0.742638,0.017843429,0.022780914,0.1715103,0.0036990948,0.0012385026,0.001065732,0.015012553],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9575513,0.009283492,0.01071459,0.0063502174,0.008969754,0.007130668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9513126,0.009722999,0.0096395975,0.005042326,0.021643132,0.0026393686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020454625,0.004762606,0.0073695597,0.002616535,0.0080468245,0.0028177598,0.008698865,0.00485973,0.0045714243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07502949,0.0045466535,0.0011826598,0.016786873,0.017109241,0.008825263,0.002172877,0.008981549,0.0010829831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083204405,0.002349923,0.0012601402,0.0007669158,0.0015250121,0.00013495154,0.01717473,0.00022905419,0.00053974654,0.032552514,0.9420154,0.0006195628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055730348,0.0018635078,0.00015374973,0.0016507257,0.0014826123,0.000078474644,0.04210638,0.00016950864,0.00064975163,0.0029963641,0.93866473,0.004611162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01603688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015251509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54493916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030813224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030035533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003170428","doi":"10.1002/sem3.20015","title":"From Behaviors of Concern to Disruption of the Learning Environment: A View of Student Judicial Affairs through a Strategic Enrollment Management Lens","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Enrollment Management Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley; Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Student affairs; Context (archaeology); Citation; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Law; Management; Higher education; History; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.05872000187830781,"score_gpt":0.35177928114156315,"score_spread":0.29305927926325537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003170428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78429455,0.00012872115,0.00026902586,0.004245209,0.00060379965,0.0030237408,0.000025772944,0.000040587394,0.20736858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968185,0.00038876585,0.0006632013,0.00015091056,0.00009891985,0.00036570182,0.00002839477,0.000020434813,0.0014651977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962582,0.0004942828,0.001047827,0.00046414466,0.001311739,0.00042382706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982584,0.00009153692,0.00087671727,0.0005466505,0.00013192013,0.000094750365],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006984087,0.0002797988,0.00040277027,0.00016210043,0.00032505285,0.00014972227,0.00067739625,0.00009038391,0.0020300813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004684234,0.00024053537,0.00019096216,0.00070174737,0.000303526,0.00063114706,0.00010877135,0.00026545793,0.00010622623],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013348149,0.003417454,0.005248642,0.00038684768,0.0012138548,0.0000102881295,0.16065738,0.0013886307,0.002769978,0.80626804,0.00076120254,0.0177442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021446096,0.001461435,0.0346556,0.00041316656,0.0007489933,4.547697e-7,0.9036436,0.000040604733,0.00028319802,0.0371153,0.018868815,0.0006241869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007000016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036583206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76915276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023777827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011161964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003993170","doi":"10.1002/alt.20180","title":"With mediation leading the way, justice department readies progress report Touting big adr savings","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Economic Justice; Treasure; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Resolution (logic); Advertising; Business; Law; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.046274783450450635,"score_gpt":0.38648320296937216,"score_spread":0.34020841951892156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003993170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83603674,0.00006967915,0.0077951024,0.13426207,0.0014344633,0.001123976,0.000007912855,0.00006400669,0.019206041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954914,0.000021109025,0.0014361407,0.0007606827,0.0009058807,0.00008120123,0.000030266361,0.000009325494,0.0012639851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984133,0.00019351115,0.00036540147,0.00017615636,0.0006300329,0.00022156049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747,0.0010442919,0.000584517,0.00021190266,0.00062671053,0.000062556835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031158403,0.00009011548,0.00009644613,0.00008695259,0.0008812131,0.0001582766,0.00024498647,0.000032552754,0.000020234575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020701152,0.000056255936,0.000023378368,0.0006632194,0.00028718173,0.0005322754,0.000030205407,0.00017734047,0.0000147630235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016390442,0.00020347627,0.029683411,0.000051197767,0.00017172865,0.000014541176,0.30682963,0.00035208443,0.0006551595,0.5296077,0.0027508808,0.12951623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056135014,0.00025821335,0.2601115,0.0002953297,0.0002639692,0.000029440433,0.101762496,0.0000928287,0.017867062,0.005196635,0.61311597,0.0004452349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001650738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034178842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6103651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016688294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021998456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6777668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004406805","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907071375","title":"Defending Rights in Russia: Lawyers, the State, and Legal Reform in the Post-Soviet Era","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; State (computer science); Law; Politics; Communism; Legislature; Judicial independence","score_opus":0.023296046616560005,"score_gpt":0.35359377397731445,"score_spread":0.33029772736075447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004406805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72913635,0.00003484833,0.000009167382,0.11922215,0.0003258215,0.00007170407,0.0000026529235,9.908492e-7,0.1511963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956018,0.000002014813,0.00009880325,0.0039607356,0.00014157595,5.824913e-7,1.2866678e-7,0.0000012486682,0.00019315782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984625,0.0001256643,0.00026766091,0.00008007849,0.00036640454,0.00069768465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864864,0.00041970378,0.00007906211,0.00008062397,0.00018394341,0.0005880036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007780809,0.00004702925,0.00006480609,0.00032760345,0.000870899,0.00045700476,0.00048510468,0.000031311352,0.00010058471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018189572,0.000026113437,0.000017445127,0.0013769114,0.0013420014,0.0011228335,0.000008257998,0.000572272,0.000005625738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018807681,0.000007004731,0.0036020603,5.234481e-7,5.8791005e-7,0.000046306603,0.009047696,4.835198e-7,0.000009043704,0.98676497,0.00011179245,0.00040765092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013875887,0.000043360833,0.7915642,0.000024616227,0.0000038980925,0.0001474845,0.057524636,0.00000598854,0.000024359628,0.031997677,0.11843803,0.00008697572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7097835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9102675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9547673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079017057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062274584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004457759","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.131530","title":"Absolute power of attorney","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Courtesy; Computer science; Power (physics); Absolute (philosophy); Absolute power; Philosophy; Theology; Physics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01407236750503455,"score_gpt":0.3164130508946021,"score_spread":0.30234068338956754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004457759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034750193,0.000030455454,0.00022596025,0.43399206,0.002775613,0.00007340708,0.0000059230724,0.000014629263,0.5281317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806459,0.000033954286,0.0001551624,0.014001998,0.0014036687,0.0000021751994,0.0000018180463,0.0000049808036,0.0037503687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980066,0.00035292588,0.00028350487,0.000059492853,0.0010360397,0.00026144547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765956,0.00038414355,0.00026302354,0.000059072787,0.00073225034,0.0009019482],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047229016,0.0000407457,0.00008957935,0.00013312284,0.00046551513,0.00010870802,0.00019784889,0.00020563956,0.016173737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015121053,0.00004110785,0.000046046258,0.00036250328,0.000063042375,0.00029195703,0.000004192576,0.0006887697,0.00023475515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001854243,0.000033938297,0.023531133,0.0000018766522,0.000043305812,0.000005042431,0.010132069,0.0000013316045,0.0000043936825,0.24066712,0.7011603,0.024417592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012407347,0.0000099710805,0.015129588,0.000009006336,0.0000046275436,0.000005126634,0.0017713011,0.000011192665,0.0000016118106,0.0009216334,0.98196507,0.000046796722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027317211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13085465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9458957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005033057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008426108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005639902","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2014.987780","title":"The making of the Canadian legal profession: a hybrid heritage","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Corporate governance; Indigenous; Law; Legal service; Adversarial system; Power (physics); Political science; International Legal English Certificate; State (computer science); Neglect; Service (business); Sociology; Comparative law; Management; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.028011926504160276,"score_gpt":0.3907726011147516,"score_spread":0.3627606746105913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005639902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13307948,0.00007171967,0.00007295366,0.7877755,0.022132928,0.0002847288,0.0000066107864,0.000009207764,0.05656683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98331827,0.000008045533,0.00010351392,0.0040903967,0.001286297,0.000004810764,6.233978e-7,0.000009010957,0.011179042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969844,0.0010135206,0.0005196347,0.00008771291,0.0011798646,0.00021483925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971315,0.00034718364,0.0010327493,0.00024142118,0.0011849401,0.00006217227],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029723882,0.00008904804,0.00010880139,0.000091980255,0.0020141215,0.00041714404,0.0017565386,0.00007295923,0.000117638694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003279222,0.00004229828,0.00015989515,0.00030805563,0.00029511182,0.00084820646,0.00014702618,0.0010203576,0.000010215597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002445483,0.00021810479,0.015519427,0.000016759031,0.0001931682,0.000011730398,0.021307541,0.00009409273,0.00166712,0.7545995,0.1797193,0.026408682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002182435,0.000016195985,0.007067651,0.00030559825,0.000016469508,0.000035201283,0.0050840485,0.00007193872,0.0005008077,0.0035030022,0.9831139,0.0000669732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025387187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09864145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8502388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003884983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034565376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008887626","doi":"10.15173/glj.v1i2.1077","title":"Review of Michael Burawoy's 'The Extended Case Method'","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Labour Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.028107143368037817,"score_gpt":0.44485535559585343,"score_spread":0.4167482122278156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008887626","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059593473,0.019989429,0.0023008557,0.67057025,0.009255441,0.0005396603,0.000109734916,0.000058249396,0.23758289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8696285,0.017390091,0.05853512,0.045604154,0.0038744933,0.000016187698,0.0000045449783,0.000016551861,0.004930369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986508,0.00047872297,0.0003155241,0.00007711484,0.00029398318,0.00018388918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830985,0.00020718611,0.00035816262,0.00016512028,0.00082439685,0.00013528489],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040125437,0.00006200203,0.0001148321,0.000024713687,0.0007691481,0.00014436514,0.00028462932,0.00005823584,0.003047307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040190117,0.00004321793,0.000077161756,0.0007415657,0.00015002972,0.00038151498,0.000020720234,0.00076471973,0.000045746845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059542535,0.00007755562,0.00027187588,0.00007845109,0.000030396002,0.00007300031,0.0015774313,3.7873363e-7,0.00015666746,0.87359643,0.07276377,0.05136811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007929274,0.000008735493,0.0006814964,0.00011479745,0.000031198626,0.0032986738,0.0019174536,0.0000012568447,0.000015654248,0.011074624,0.98272055,0.00005627606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038909742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021568623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90995675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049514987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00132314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99786407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010265656","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.3.425","title":"Legal Ethics at a Time of Regulatory Change: The Sixth International Legal Ethics Conference, London","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1427102844206633,"score_gpt":0.42337192878588,"score_spread":0.2806616443652167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010265656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013156923,0.00009469156,0.00072045706,0.6997949,0.003404085,0.00041716476,0.000049162965,0.00013945563,0.28222317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244902,0.0002498046,0.0005140272,0.029576138,0.0018237524,0.0000492659,0.00006709288,0.000033605374,0.043196127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99322367,0.0028278565,0.00064430025,0.00042314242,0.0024099029,0.0004711023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884501,0.0074850866,0.00061260443,0.00060346327,0.0026623774,0.00018634448],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014363473,0.00025183926,0.00029699298,0.00018542851,0.0020675077,0.0006502364,0.0010836258,0.0013869365,0.0013341737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023182996,0.0002174542,0.00015637823,0.0007853421,0.0019165273,0.0017257325,0.00023356524,0.008961026,0.00039369217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046634646,0.00009959257,0.00016884974,0.000038025755,0.000046866422,0.0000019606298,0.08779627,0.000013949648,0.00026896675,0.9020264,0.008723364,0.00076910324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002973961,0.00006021979,0.0009929648,0.00007811399,0.000044625685,0.00000947013,0.0035227772,0.0004535487,0.0003430614,0.005192094,0.9887369,0.00026882289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022568168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019988729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98001355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029176648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005981893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011503928","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2007.9959751","title":"Wands away (or preaching to infidels who wear earplugs)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Nothing; Obligation; MAGIC (telescope); Wizard; Meaning (existential); Feeling; Order (exchange); Comprehension; Psychology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Law; Art; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07065791510760375,"score_gpt":0.43585564644162045,"score_spread":0.3651977313340167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011503928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11118459,0.000016026177,0.0006895714,0.09996669,0.000360899,0.0002163379,9.758352e-7,0.00009058502,0.78747433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8920711,0.0000035050123,0.0004925682,0.008160943,0.0007125442,0.000009139054,0.0000011503395,0.000009688222,0.09853934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989636,0.00020121018,0.00016868513,0.00011727989,0.00027815608,0.00027106737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991634,0.00037046146,0.00006092945,0.00022573142,0.00007588899,0.00010357966],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037770767,0.000066751076,0.00007356826,0.000038391117,0.00086995127,0.00022177908,0.00028022935,0.00006577725,0.0018005405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007546111,0.000044026925,0.000028885315,0.00047254798,0.00012442953,0.00045715572,0.00003463209,0.00039698862,0.0004476428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029200399,0.00006188469,0.0006936151,0.0000015838694,0.00001453207,8.719134e-7,0.17217612,0.000004500753,0.0001403655,0.792156,0.02583138,0.008889981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006983687,0.000014246462,0.0017174162,0.000007735781,0.000008746602,8.594515e-7,0.014012072,0.000003482051,0.000118105345,0.0018842857,0.98208237,0.00008086788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017087236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014615249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95625097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082635626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021432064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012170552","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2014.977792","title":"Corporate lawyers and their clients: walking the line between law and business","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Line (geometry); Law; Business; Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.05079369631470559,"score_gpt":0.37526455453641777,"score_spread":0.3244708582217122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012170552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6194171,0.00009155163,0.0006522044,0.35806945,0.004389834,0.00010120528,0.000004318587,0.00000989345,0.017264444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937708,0.000047481397,0.000114842296,0.003739419,0.0012555369,0.000001199758,0.0000013406085,0.000004951963,0.0010644314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987947,0.00043285167,0.0002618517,0.00006727503,0.000354661,0.000088703586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799293,0.0004991361,0.0006568747,0.00007807181,0.00072772946,0.000045248413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018803686,0.000062428386,0.00008538678,0.00004818859,0.0006226503,0.0003325372,0.0004005577,0.000048863345,0.000021366286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009758904,0.00003043905,0.000030238813,0.00018010598,0.00026656242,0.0008238399,0.00010232191,0.0004309053,0.0000022866889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011657537,0.00010217244,0.02889941,0.000011058445,0.00013941198,0.0000018117388,0.02291603,0.000028202074,0.00096021494,0.87430316,0.003893129,0.06862881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004810866,0.000027258573,0.031644464,0.000219589,0.000027815195,0.000024221397,0.005589095,0.000073175375,0.00028794105,0.03171399,0.92981815,0.00009323414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006856768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019451887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.925925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044548604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018123878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47889858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012417400","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0005","title":"Methodology and Perspective in the Theory of Lawyers' Ethics: A Response to Professors Woolley and Markovits","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Adjudication; Sociology; Identity (music); Legal profession; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09049720170802593,"score_gpt":0.4104518565846362,"score_spread":0.31995465487661023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012417400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77227587,0.00014206048,0.00019910054,0.120109156,0.00024247631,0.00016285671,0.0000042347306,0.0000036996069,0.106860526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99338174,0.00009019727,0.005338085,0.00043063887,0.000032638385,9.1661704e-8,6.852895e-8,0.0000013572104,0.0007252035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695575,0.0026882244,0.00007338143,0.000064699656,0.00013869125,0.00007926436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965505,0.0029240027,0.000110874804,0.000062956475,0.00029831752,0.000053357628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009207737,0.0000325424,0.00008044163,0.000038825492,0.00055764813,0.00002362839,0.00015617609,0.00008445196,0.00035793873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033234507,0.000028395574,0.000017051862,0.00007447612,0.00048530698,0.00040533178,0.000028496166,0.00058805005,4.0248509e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043794417,0.00002467318,0.00038184394,0.0000015635253,0.000009280136,0.0000018030178,0.4111616,1.6231814e-7,0.00041219025,0.5869271,0.00016178613,0.0004800341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028659144,0.00006850032,0.02752557,0.000010827266,0.000017036737,0.000011913176,0.86069316,5.7234354e-7,0.000015224636,0.013065149,0.09826387,0.000041576594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11166347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49900344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57386196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006942763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040629922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89425206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015415709","doi":"10.1007/s10609-014-9235-y","title":"Criminal Justice Reform and the System’s Efficiency","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Law Forum","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Process (computing); Political science; Public international law; Sustainable development; Law; Public administration; Business; International law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03531765942655648,"score_gpt":0.3451952809486887,"score_spread":0.3098776215221322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015415709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021005277,0.00008721917,0.0016438874,0.053976484,0.0011668215,0.00020224393,0.0000021787334,0.000080386475,0.9218355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935305,0.000011779479,0.00032554858,0.003730388,0.00039174221,0.000023677778,0.0000025105408,0.0000067205806,0.001977109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987553,0.00031146486,0.00019555767,0.0001552397,0.00029055667,0.00029191817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897593,0.0004411413,0.000111486894,0.00019398998,0.00018467303,0.00009276738],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022038873,0.000082523395,0.0001085724,0.000034426717,0.0023788402,0.00030215507,0.0002343202,0.000059196707,0.00006320321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006884386,0.00005536898,0.000037124748,0.00019982354,0.0008449901,0.0004318074,0.00004017439,0.00023036767,0.00009925183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024330418,0.000020289803,0.000008598885,0.00006503188,0.000003251001,3.913103e-7,0.0164737,6.174175e-7,0.0000051067113,0.9807036,0.00082958385,0.0018655333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040655426,0.00004647819,0.00015296483,0.000026515077,0.00035693316,0.0000174945,0.3030492,0.0003496176,0.000028129567,0.0034023914,0.69203687,0.00012684357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017647794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028793905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9773012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012816148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018537637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016390031","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.48.2.305","title":"Commentary: Gone But Not Forgotten: Should Judges Be Allowed to Remedy by Re-sentencing?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Criminology; Law; Economic Justice; Sentencing guidelines; Psychology; Criminal justice; Political science; Philosophy; Sentence","score_opus":0.15219045557122368,"score_gpt":0.3664769625786127,"score_spread":0.214286507007389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016390031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73602915,0.0005295249,0.0010650031,0.25274435,0.0009560399,0.00023115751,0.00009464182,0.000034010274,0.008316165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92690474,0.00029057058,0.004151402,0.06640668,0.00079907384,0.00002614931,0.00004896959,0.0000418021,0.0013305934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957922,0.0008288787,0.000881743,0.00046883908,0.0002240491,0.0018042699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943381,0.0018707986,0.00055029854,0.0003731553,0.0009421177,0.0019255307],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028552935,0.00038063177,0.00055994774,0.00079626776,0.0013271176,0.0003334615,0.0008740803,0.000562601,0.0003512048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008553334,0.00042658666,0.00013762829,0.00031192845,0.001002676,0.0007007746,0.000056444496,0.0016298647,0.000014179458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043560643,0.00031888482,0.0047058477,0.0009340449,0.00025220303,0.0028963836,0.1306311,0.00028421075,0.0066798422,0.26535538,0.57470506,0.0128014125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079633633,0.0005502106,0.012055375,0.00012757805,0.004776631,0.0011971488,0.4813242,0.000043938504,0.0008490141,0.002652339,0.49494842,0.0006788369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32340154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58550966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35069308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017709483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063284747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017316122","doi":"10.1017/s1472669600002164","title":"Laying the Foundations for Law Library Co-operation around the world","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Library science; China; Political science; Desk; Service (business); Sociology; Law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.044244145073227506,"score_gpt":0.36856861482718134,"score_spread":0.32432446975395385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017316122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009864263,0.000008017587,0.0153789865,0.13352309,0.0006118905,0.00095690065,0.000006974641,0.00007358341,0.8493419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8464949,0.000046316894,0.006158536,0.06802353,0.00047650374,0.0008702738,0.00032112605,0.000013575184,0.07759524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903744,0.0001570354,0.00029338774,0.00006769818,0.00027116024,0.00017324704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992118,0.00031572717,0.00015716207,0.00020370314,0.00007912999,0.00003250751],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010987748,0.00007094899,0.0000459107,0.00009532453,0.002981326,0.0026616126,0.00022982566,0.000025086354,0.00085569505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011293966,0.00004796745,0.00004258466,0.000496356,0.00012753726,0.008517372,0.00001705626,0.00015544277,0.00037055908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030861954,0.000013131834,0.000041664913,0.00000696749,0.000016808812,2.9446781e-8,0.0038418253,0.0002482315,2.987351e-7,0.8899639,0.10370414,0.0021598786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013343211,0.0000052038963,0.00011887285,0.0000032256266,0.000018068531,2.9837582e-7,0.020226447,0.00021618906,0.000015321562,0.008243869,0.9709496,0.00006948234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004126549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066867867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88172007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000687982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017047077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020765254","doi":"10.7202/1006698ar","title":"Former l’apprenti juriste à une approche du droit réflexive, critique et sereinement positiviste : l’heureuse expérience d’une revisite du cours « Fondements du droit » à l’Université de Montréal","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01493980828004705,"score_gpt":0.26409958917967596,"score_spread":0.24915978089962892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020765254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67431384,0.0008998454,0.021267587,0.06821363,0.0010286063,0.00091023877,0.000099102675,0.00016967725,0.2330975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91923285,0.003081421,0.0034063358,0.0065716067,0.00040986895,0.00009471544,0.00011719042,0.00007173304,0.06701431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959436,0.0005705585,0.00073878944,0.0007901532,0.0007951004,0.0011617987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971314,0.0003733854,0.00071395456,0.000592619,0.0005778461,0.0006108053],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019377057,0.00049177883,0.00047189477,0.0002335991,0.001959474,0.000309255,0.000884499,0.00056515017,0.001338411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053823664,0.00063612795,0.00029198022,0.0016563758,0.0011603876,0.002094982,0.00020063251,0.0012488656,0.00020115136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025260873,0.0010334532,0.008310673,0.00015926067,0.00030783878,0.00022550703,0.3197232,0.000036076704,0.0004945574,0.63524747,0.029023072,0.0051862905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028399187,0.00054101815,0.04310703,0.000530031,0.001110049,0.00035967169,0.11837275,0.0012605113,0.0015175336,0.07767865,0.75084394,0.0018388927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04370028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0089668175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7218209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003630749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009150013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022301090","doi":"10.1353/utq.2005.0053","title":"Law's Dream of a Common Knowledge (review)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Law; Dream; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Need to know; Population; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.021572949826014525,"score_gpt":0.31642564536196016,"score_spread":0.2948526955359456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022301090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019631945,0.003306308,0.00015367036,0.0099189,0.00025854437,0.0002143852,0.000012780184,0.000034874087,0.9664686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958745,0.0007195081,0.0005945078,0.00017135899,0.00003430788,1.4243193e-7,0.0000054145407,0.0000022992149,0.0025979106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951863,0.0000902858,0.0001046151,0.0000746317,0.00012492023,0.00008691941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993998,0.00006063867,0.00013793398,0.00013152917,0.00021785604,0.000052277017],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025241016,0.000041756135,0.00012010466,0.000014541619,0.00019132125,0.00000608579,0.00020480885,0.000041063024,0.0013193245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023608844,0.00005085618,0.000055139724,0.0000868416,0.00020640157,0.000633924,0.0000070604283,0.000061354505,0.0000401441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013407046,0.0005643473,0.00010115053,0.00010232407,0.000030390167,0.0000014785674,0.18782346,6.738694e-7,0.000081010076,0.7778874,0.013815889,0.019578477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035130585,0.00017815718,0.0016179171,0.00016552895,0.00004457299,4.8543416e-7,0.05579318,6.92254e-7,0.000022380187,0.0011724079,0.9405651,0.0000882634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38833866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43878382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018881274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038846023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202267463","doi":"","title":"The Real Issues of Judicial Ethics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appearance of impropriety; Law; Appeal; Joke; Quarter (Canadian coin); Magistrate; Political science; Legal ethics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.05889109318111226,"score_gpt":0.3970591353102256,"score_spread":0.33816804212911333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202267463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015896546,0.00029016007,0.000021170563,0.08934495,0.0013590428,0.00014336362,0.000004264436,0.000046074303,0.89289445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97079796,0.0008213111,0.00095620134,0.002482507,0.0005709856,0.000014788475,0.0000030225842,0.000008617156,0.024344618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850595,0.0005938338,0.00021192967,0.00010217363,0.0003985923,0.000187519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832416,0.00091243605,0.00013138216,0.00019890585,0.00035116274,0.00008194485],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002632931,0.000054309825,0.00007703234,0.000020558813,0.0014204874,0.00017652928,0.00021098762,0.000116708536,0.000720347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060077454,0.000043779866,0.000036985082,0.00042681332,0.00043269005,0.00036772553,0.000011289131,0.00057264953,0.00017708541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037637612,0.000027946042,0.00065123773,0.0000019139632,0.0000074049076,2.2566901e-7,0.0067344205,8.958527e-7,0.000060984356,0.9733393,0.018900977,0.0002708838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006484006,0.000011568731,0.00049941364,0.0000055475034,0.000006926799,2.2000035e-7,0.006799439,3.9075786e-7,0.0003571757,0.034822322,0.9573769,0.000055287248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054796204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049488038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9549014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004585533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011984719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028193201","doi":"10.1080/0270319x.2014.922398","title":"Electronic Legal Research Tools: An Examination of the Resources Available, Training of New Attorneys, and Employer Expectations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Reference Services Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Legal writing; Legal education; Scholarship; Legal profession; Law library; Political science; Law; Sociology; Library science; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.12511290284780088,"score_gpt":0.39206933982013165,"score_spread":0.26695643697233074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028193201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90665835,0.00008724302,0.000044907654,0.004306466,0.00011976769,0.00021319858,0.0000059602526,0.00003034205,0.08853375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947168,0.000015954258,0.00025343514,0.00013606188,0.00020178253,0.000017511957,0.000012541878,0.000010533848,0.0046353578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714386,0.0011496745,0.0003748112,0.00026568913,0.0007101432,0.00035580597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796987,0.00064059003,0.00028451046,0.0003530915,0.0006387384,0.00011318985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022242423,0.00010301953,0.00016007724,0.00018201992,0.00061919546,0.00039510423,0.0005300761,0.00011374089,0.00025919382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003560901,0.00008579332,0.000030353047,0.0010631677,0.00027561214,0.0024807004,0.000021516205,0.0005037442,0.000021813294],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024219631,0.00009959635,0.000858401,0.00004844201,0.000018654357,1.03812404e-7,0.40201142,0.0000022492563,0.0013807428,0.49554524,0.00032504444,0.09968589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039420472,0.0008735002,0.07597881,0.00012298682,0.00003461875,0.0000021777134,0.3372394,0.00019456785,0.00041576452,0.0064002015,0.57811147,0.00023230989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031461906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053333014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5777864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058845566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00106803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9749877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029611428","doi":"10.1353/scp.2008.0009","title":"A Different Kind of Profession: The Council of Editors of Learned Journals (CELJ) Keynote Address MLA Convention 2006","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Sociology; Legal profession; Political science; Library science; Public relations; Law; Management; Engineering ethics; Media studies; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.22528911780739236,"score_gpt":0.3937313009811818,"score_spread":0.16844218317378945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029611428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87649816,0.0011083287,0.00018426747,0.10133946,0.0060970676,0.00020212613,0.000014458122,0.000007253749,0.014548857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948237,0.00029452614,0.0002455568,0.00022030553,0.0025101341,0.0000019627123,0.0000015171611,0.000009099927,0.0018931846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441814,0.00089444214,0.0013084541,0.00009925769,0.0030809839,0.0001986907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838648,0.00082305213,0.0039962674,0.00018893783,0.010988848,0.00013812723],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012129813,0.00009962645,0.00033662398,0.00029823964,0.0005835417,0.0018540017,0.00079333043,0.00020655496,0.0004519541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026268423,0.00006695832,0.00019330381,0.0010108976,0.00031986402,0.029720237,0.000059716418,0.002026814,0.0000013218554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007340405,0.0023885835,0.19247599,0.00023288195,0.00066315394,0.000019979925,0.26884812,0.00010231111,0.03440302,0.024785185,0.46359313,0.011753608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024022397,0.00036784203,0.16185391,0.0012461286,0.00023256704,0.00007779057,0.06820131,0.000015974045,0.0050837277,0.0043863547,0.7558616,0.00027056353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011158519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015517868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29226846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038321695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00707875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031108337","doi":"10.1089/blr.2012.9750","title":"Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuits Against Life Science Companies on the Rise in the First Quarter 2012","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biotechnology Law Report","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Quarter (Canadian coin); Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Business; Law; Securities fraud; Political science; History; State (computer science); Computer science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.06849701425227893,"score_gpt":0.36705103032902103,"score_spread":0.2985540160767421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031108337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44211373,0.0001629212,0.000010823626,0.40593046,0.0012024909,0.00029192676,0.0000019890733,0.00012504062,0.15016063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99300754,0.00007139708,0.00003412724,0.006238676,0.000292043,0.00006791188,0.0000021019816,0.0000050670105,0.00028111323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856126,0.00015002339,0.00027717502,0.00018771984,0.00043293153,0.00039090714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875116,0.00036427935,0.00023820015,0.00047393335,0.00012376189,0.000048685655],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034989885,0.000094884126,0.00009750518,0.00014938602,0.001854176,0.00019775667,0.0005240069,0.00023983972,0.000096279815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015282173,0.000060432267,0.000031956908,0.0012038341,0.0024009915,0.0011025984,0.000042583146,0.0006955424,0.000116114745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036172737,0.00013924218,0.0029757791,0.0000023764694,0.000005527715,0.0000037637567,0.009895048,0.0000010428521,0.00008026447,0.9663404,0.020242406,0.00031049456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004362398,0.000014838478,0.011788545,0.000008816489,0.000005255694,0.000018842307,0.026932098,0.0000059090985,0.00047789575,0.0010932474,0.9595258,0.00008512041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023543665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008402922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9652472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012617449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004254739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W203119075","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4364","title":"OPPORTUNITIES AND LIMITATIONS IN THE PROVISION OF SELF-HELP LEGAL RESOURCES TO CITIZENS IN NEED","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Process (computing); Service provider; Public relations; Legal research; Business; Legal service; Knowledge management; Point (geometry); Service (business); Internet privacy; Political science; Marketing; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.18574860047580985,"score_gpt":0.3929875146692892,"score_spread":0.20723891419347937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W203119075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77447337,0.000060978884,0.0000118081625,0.049999107,0.00015469028,0.0004412887,0.000005415462,0.000012898242,0.17484044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966419,0.000049363498,0.00071963057,0.0015217033,0.00015625395,0.000034116943,0.0000015325447,0.000005528223,0.00087002176],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989868,0.00022088982,0.0002656723,0.00009008195,0.00025454475,0.00018200318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985524,0.0009690013,0.000112672045,0.0001267809,0.00015689465,0.00008224401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012927213,0.0000594734,0.00010540102,0.00032372557,0.000114450704,0.00013060393,0.0002848965,0.000046638997,0.000047091187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020818787,0.00005157323,0.000014152722,0.00081254967,0.00008065121,0.0010382714,0.000054606433,0.00014453192,0.0000068055147],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009233592,0.0006286743,0.03525552,0.00017350762,0.000016215276,0.0000018039232,0.7344541,0.00008847274,0.000470501,0.20887366,0.01168612,0.008259104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018438464,0.00005742675,0.30155677,0.00006706865,0.000045065364,8.258967e-7,0.23161884,0.000011806704,0.00007462432,0.00019123749,0.46607843,0.00011352061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037307728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023958771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5028352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003116386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025892947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56398374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031535197","doi":"10.5235/147293412803188829","title":"Ontario's Administrative Tribunal Clusters: A Glass Half-full or Half-empty for Administrative Justice?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Statutory law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Administrative law; Business; Quality (philosophy); Law","score_opus":0.14550716466108246,"score_gpt":0.40249299024392743,"score_spread":0.256985825582845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031535197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04873381,0.00007856274,0.014275205,0.12180866,0.0048174225,0.0014787639,0.00017831399,0.00012513567,0.8085041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968246,0.00009375719,0.008166559,0.0017713062,0.0011831811,0.0000047876447,0.000045285327,0.000015702415,0.02047345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973978,0.00064584997,0.0004235985,0.00022039025,0.0004929602,0.0008194261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619555,0.0012587768,0.0007139468,0.00019777214,0.0007546494,0.00087927724],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019586484,0.00022237188,0.00030730793,0.00015383477,0.005711875,0.00039775792,0.0005390092,0.00021340323,0.0020187795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053505006,0.00021566842,0.00017253692,0.0005447272,0.00043586246,0.003131818,0.00005806077,0.0012780748,0.000018267046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022764497,0.00080624496,0.0018209649,0.0000378906,0.00015285607,0.00003099161,0.065834604,0.0000038211683,0.0000033055028,0.9044339,0.022693837,0.0019051575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012429587,0.0005244874,0.0007119856,0.00003253301,0.00020145431,0.000087396365,0.10054961,0.000015315427,0.000009160291,0.0006622692,0.8957185,0.000244318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037344504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7149226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91951215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017855351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071869944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032183069","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342004","title":"A Best Practice Model for the Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Social Context Training for Judicial Officers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legislation; Political science; Constitution; Public relations; Best practice; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.48954993245133815,"score_gpt":0.5554687837529179,"score_spread":0.0659188513015797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032183069","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15746196,0.014704819,0.2710653,0.5353177,0.004008897,0.0054420587,0.00010048431,0.000022749573,0.011876034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994503,0.000111828405,0.0041928445,0.00031935598,0.00074507645,0.00006910816,7.481827e-7,0.0000053089343,0.000052723863],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986906,0.00031334642,0.00036068592,0.000050715375,0.0004220882,0.00016257609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344003,0.003045562,0.0008434236,0.000027661808,0.0026067996,0.00003652333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00866741,0.00005815508,0.00015207387,0.00006153568,0.00092904625,0.000057561003,0.000076596116,0.000024331868,0.00000990455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005070792,0.000043513337,0.0000581661,0.00018286862,0.00017504637,0.0012636406,0.000008753109,0.00010226744,1.8989647e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037437223,0.0001401767,0.000057317793,0.000012080852,0.00053482654,4.0578655e-8,0.74411374,0.0003863555,0.00007469689,0.149672,0.011086342,0.093548074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007984096,0.0001782667,0.0001228685,0.000008117384,0.0007941292,0.0000023825949,0.88426507,0.00096453395,0.000022618291,0.0011616606,0.111626014,0.000055962893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028450234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047564274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8370411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014832878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013635068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71455663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033011605","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.223","title":"Canada: Foreclosures, Freemen, Foreign Law Schools and the Continuing Search for Meaningful Access to Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Public access; Free access; Through-the-lens metering; Law; Lens (geology); Public administration; Engineering; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.10831789687854802,"score_gpt":0.4190919363500591,"score_spread":0.31077403947151105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033011605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008807156,0.0000699351,0.0025251019,0.77701145,0.0006500838,0.0015275938,0.000024088558,0.000036406553,0.20934816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9462144,0.000017684726,0.0014324631,0.04789149,0.00048738872,0.00022513249,0.0000063451052,0.000011522766,0.0037135896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983568,0.00036620742,0.00021926156,0.00018127842,0.00054145505,0.00033499405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945363,0.0038812817,0.000085239364,0.00017324189,0.0011596804,0.00016428833],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036107325,0.00008676594,0.00012066708,0.000035038353,0.0015236189,0.0016008646,0.00042106124,0.00013183051,0.00017070181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074281986,0.00006712688,0.000025748759,0.00036757966,0.0003167936,0.0013121201,0.000078870056,0.0011231578,0.000011665544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018392835,0.00000611251,0.00011606276,0.000021658198,0.000012242343,2.3551242e-7,0.015527133,0.000014135457,0.000007715289,0.91494113,0.06853767,0.0007975238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000354452,0.000014322344,0.0002908742,0.000023623335,0.00003522144,7.7234307e-7,0.021157708,0.00011126208,0.00007971828,0.018546937,0.9592745,0.00011062069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9718176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9651515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93740726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012724254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033000638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045049176","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.1.135","title":"Canada: Death of a Legal Icon, Dawn of Change?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Law; Supreme court; Icon; Political science; Doors; Prime minister; History; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.19568745720635589,"score_gpt":0.424318465318099,"score_spread":0.22863100811174314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045049176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03218547,0.000073827665,0.000618098,0.43491992,0.0018313734,0.00025814323,0.000044051958,0.000035541623,0.5300336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900679,0.000022078782,0.00041933756,0.0061017587,0.0003435165,0.000008079158,0.000006854694,0.000006097073,0.0030243911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985949,0.0003226913,0.0002531433,0.00010676231,0.0005567676,0.0001657319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798256,0.00089545175,0.00022662675,0.00017526979,0.000645418,0.000074683536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017793779,0.000061490806,0.00013308415,0.000054597545,0.0002491019,0.00004416583,0.00021192778,0.00015022494,0.0001641076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050856373,0.00006232491,0.000030587085,0.00038171918,0.00021266095,0.0004865069,0.000020934487,0.0007156559,0.000004469369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044870844,0.000032752225,0.0010465496,0.000022490454,0.000008310072,3.798175e-7,0.010451118,0.0000015816495,0.0000979422,0.98445415,0.0030673475,0.0008129155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086458625,0.00002261725,0.0029819824,0.000016763233,0.0000125736415,6.470184e-7,0.0017993954,0.000019695459,0.00059445394,0.001763699,0.9926287,0.00007303375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98479146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94595575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007943988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008413901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99720746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045477339","doi":"10.1097/00001888-200110001-00016","title":"The Rhetoric of Rationalization","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Medicine","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalization (economics); Rhetoric; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.08900820945511195,"score_gpt":0.4589439008756494,"score_spread":0.36993569142053745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045477339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015985377,0.0010505037,0.0027783706,0.5306615,0.0015607239,0.00017763674,3.6820947e-7,0.000033643006,0.44775182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96614206,0.0040581017,0.0000171845,0.0014855496,0.0010086462,0.000008290277,0.0000061998153,0.0000024398817,0.02727153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992481,0.00011105099,0.00020524273,0.000050341645,0.0003018155,0.000083469145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988215,0.0007115029,0.00014263454,0.000072430725,0.00021661552,0.00003533497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014187191,0.000026967844,0.000044776694,0.00003926511,0.00038388284,0.0000058948845,0.00013689649,0.00005373446,0.00068731327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045635444,0.000017493496,0.000006911695,0.00068351714,0.0002510895,0.00020286773,0.0000052541645,0.00019687902,0.000023195158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035539767,0.0000018622545,0.002327441,8.808316e-7,0.0000032692383,6.272919e-8,0.015852094,0.0000015257585,0.00012842644,0.9020734,0.07647677,0.0031307326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079137084,0.0000075077764,0.0014838595,0.000009446679,0.000006247102,8.4914274e-7,0.0066752387,0.000015220369,0.000015716656,0.013871566,0.97781557,0.000019656296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005601695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000119727796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9501567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032761636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002755761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7525598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049285175","doi":"10.7202/1025144ar","title":"Of Justice and Its Scales: Looking Back on (Almost) Forty Years of Rod Macdonald’s Scholarship on Access to Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.09051163513513426,"score_gpt":0.4056112552012065,"score_spread":0.31509962006607223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049285175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4108371,0.000035999332,0.0000953097,0.024636038,0.001447094,0.00024801423,0.000036141537,0.00001686387,0.56264746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958329,0.000043976037,0.00053702603,0.0030558936,0.00029358428,0.0000018576452,0.0000010452203,0.000009839421,0.00022384756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985635,0.00027654276,0.0003254674,0.00013857288,0.00049870054,0.00019716205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981791,0.0007396568,0.0003265568,0.000116882846,0.00045471528,0.00018312948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018082898,0.00007932832,0.00014555898,0.000126246,0.0012059273,0.00016728375,0.00030423878,0.00007250482,0.00029787136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030074737,0.0000775834,0.000039629784,0.00040530917,0.00008103023,0.000919857,0.000039217757,0.0005017802,0.000050286053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011392808,0.00019226527,0.0005279548,0.00009686728,0.000027881058,0.000002197305,0.0017078888,0.00022313342,0.00028259328,0.98286426,0.0012240768,0.012736971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005274892,0.00027148906,0.020450898,0.00029497713,0.000193605,0.000015953005,0.0021793535,0.000031873653,0.0021118787,0.0019499967,0.97176343,0.00020904536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004349106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023538396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98091424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007016738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006138924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.927514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050061770","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.1.81","title":"Legal Feminism and the Post-Racism Fantasy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Scholarship; Oppression; Feminism; Colonialism; Sociology; Gender studies; White (mutation); Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.020533839274851275,"score_gpt":0.29110096470236874,"score_spread":0.2705671254275175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050061770","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28755826,0.0003913925,0.000029947263,0.40487808,0.00073362084,0.00014885709,0.0000077960985,0.0000046645696,0.30624738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784236,0.00011338797,0.00004222408,0.015405424,0.00047329091,0.0000059008726,0.0000010083926,0.000006807881,0.005528355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987801,0.00047961128,0.00024973543,0.00007921984,0.00012457628,0.0002867753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981263,0.0009125615,0.00024044616,0.00012344132,0.00018704262,0.0004102059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047268127,0.000076059354,0.00019197109,0.00008125456,0.00093521056,0.0006148794,0.00025795176,0.000053455176,0.00015989784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012176675,0.00004770744,0.000049181603,0.00017771,0.0011091306,0.00049016427,0.000012366468,0.0004430247,0.000008291506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003761112,0.0000038137866,0.00013970323,0.0000032083392,0.000025623905,0.000004100695,0.097687185,7.54166e-7,0.0000010353683,0.89888054,0.00094463653,0.0022717745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012668401,0.000036194862,0.0011337778,0.00001750642,0.000024297007,0.0001462685,0.024698082,0.000013626659,0.0000015537222,0.13156807,0.84101284,0.000080926744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04332144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11355579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8400682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011747707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011203833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9630492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051050868","doi":"10.5367/000000002101296522","title":"Legal Issues within the Intellectual Property Policies of Canadian Universities","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industry and Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Business; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Legal responsibility; Public relations; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.09041744042259324,"score_gpt":0.3524386548100263,"score_spread":0.26202121438743303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051050868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28434664,0.00024949622,1.3006061e-7,0.281508,0.00067577965,0.0000793145,0.0000028442837,0.000011097981,0.4331267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7550699,0.000049726124,0.000023045088,0.0010944713,0.00032553924,0.000003908653,0.000001941688,0.000002067942,0.2434294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999551,0.00009962983,0.00009227321,0.000064450374,0.00009783593,0.00009480266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995648,0.000087365945,0.00005954256,0.00007725507,0.00015093852,0.00006008703],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018131496,0.000042752516,0.000042440915,0.00018089665,0.0005691547,0.00012590567,0.0000999455,0.0001147125,0.0032044176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011215111,0.000029013027,0.000009395631,0.00067418616,0.00028826334,0.00046963728,0.000006608706,0.0003070602,0.00002076564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015238967,0.00004720893,0.00090435805,0.000003063288,0.000008507552,8.622279e-8,0.1316663,0.0000013635891,0.0000105485915,0.65860075,0.20702219,0.0017341254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001851821,0.000008730682,0.0032536483,0.000008186597,0.000007672516,0.0000010141472,0.11232863,0.0000016154081,0.000043113174,0.0003241512,0.8839631,0.000041586438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.750934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09966124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6769409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008198173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016467117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053572639","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977626","title":"Aristotle's <i>Nicomachean Ethics</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Happiness; Value (mathematics); Normative ethics; Meta-ethics; Environmental ethics; Applied ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Social science; Information ethics; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.09897859111288933,"score_gpt":0.3141878611192558,"score_spread":0.21520927000636647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053572639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006036856,0.000086637054,0.00015275725,0.0013439412,0.0010856385,0.00033587564,0.00009332962,0.00022247025,0.9966733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005683076,0.00019008179,0.00014844969,0.0010079958,0.00048539537,0.000001238644,0.00007887086,0.000030516598,0.99748915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819875,0.0004594783,0.00018986821,0.00037606573,0.00044864594,0.0003272143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979476,0.0004643818,0.0003389895,0.00047174035,0.0005350205,0.00024232194],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007984527,0.00022018634,0.00024049534,0.00019183633,0.0012295507,0.00014537104,0.00076471706,0.0008264288,0.00007140137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031325847,0.0002864052,0.00015012255,0.00004743618,0.00069737784,0.00032878135,0.00015672678,0.0024517416,0.0001273269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012042119,0.00001671545,0.000001099393,0.000016803246,0.00003263616,0.0000152446455,0.0033345807,3.1749355e-8,0.0000014954481,0.60952264,0.3867072,0.0003395094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015989681,0.00001423383,0.0000064617916,0.00005805663,0.00013056683,0.0000016968938,0.001015661,6.124179e-7,0.000019600842,0.00014754284,0.9981281,0.00031753254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012118897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002796892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6114209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065412157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006065497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054368023","doi":"","title":"Do Ontario and its Gaming Venues Owe a Duty of Care to Problem Gamblers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Context (archaeology); Harm; Liability; Government (linguistics); Duty; Business; Duty to protect; Advertising; Law; Finance; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.015992735468182424,"score_gpt":0.3246380724001331,"score_spread":0.3086453369319507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054368023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93556094,0.0032602053,0.000096391974,0.015270239,0.00022088578,0.0001848438,0.0000018629077,0.000014515829,0.045390133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954955,0.00046151108,0.0001722809,0.00008440653,0.00022132075,0.0000041027733,0.0000014853117,0.0000053554427,0.0035540122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988438,0.0000711513,0.00016684468,0.00008793793,0.000209436,0.00062083284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944377,0.000042384225,0.00013413622,0.000046606227,0.00028173937,0.00005135285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009224073,0.00005341247,0.00007790031,0.00009342193,0.0003770372,0.00010205223,0.00010353324,0.000039593906,0.000078003744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013263247,0.000053060478,0.00002381303,0.0003133577,0.000028504592,0.0003385664,0.000010421185,0.0007968119,0.000007988556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037258644,0.00007231678,0.01352671,0.000011958619,0.000041923588,0.00000117732,0.0960509,0.00004075986,0.0006319859,0.86553144,0.0008849413,0.023168635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042592786,0.0002509436,0.0104027,0.000059746748,0.000046270357,0.000043456967,0.085952275,0.0000011805605,0.0002118097,0.10874967,0.7936382,0.00021780316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037233427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5032921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7927533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009555199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007864149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99776036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055397043","doi":"10.1111/j.1911-3838.2012.00035.x","title":"The Case for Unifying a Profession","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Citation; Library science; Chief executive officer; Accounting; Management; Political science; Computer science; Business; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06774248383423641,"score_gpt":0.45203263949258454,"score_spread":0.3842901556583481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055397043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68751067,0.0014410416,0.0006353836,0.16406702,0.0027524156,0.0007553036,0.0000029197574,0.00017047381,0.14266476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945002,0.000029376326,0.00077812717,0.00021206324,0.001174441,0.00006296258,6.4830436e-7,0.000006339926,0.0032358237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993886,0.000098644516,0.000087867294,0.000076954406,0.000095585136,0.00025238903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998406,0.0010729952,0.00009646706,0.000091187896,0.0002980233,0.000035327812],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018877413,0.000042338495,0.00003578176,0.000032770393,0.0036165146,0.0002745117,0.00009302318,0.000036313515,0.000056111432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037922175,0.000030704694,0.000026804157,0.0002846897,0.00012029662,0.0011798034,0.0000157604,0.00014689464,0.00001986743],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005450253,0.00004589157,0.004948091,0.0000029593991,0.000009037755,5.0115926e-7,0.23374218,1.3310782e-7,0.000041162304,0.7499236,0.0058083874,0.0054726102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041370506,0.0000023417435,0.0009863087,0.0000034713737,0.0000060162583,0.0000065754903,0.5283352,0.000007741855,0.000013186456,0.0011319384,0.46942434,0.00004148521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002027154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077702117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74879164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009890021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022600757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99768066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056144851","doi":"10.5235/20414005.4.4.645","title":"Turbulent Transitions: Implementing Global Perspectives in Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transnational Legal Theory","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal education; Globalization; Legal realism; Legal pluralism; Political science; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Legal profession; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02359000658747235,"score_gpt":0.3676486777065727,"score_spread":0.3440586711191004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056144851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14353141,0.00023064495,0.002312632,0.42446193,0.00046602846,0.0007942627,0.000027924605,0.00011425172,0.42806092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929635,0.000012572639,0.001305493,0.0016615946,0.00027589948,0.00022100846,0.00006136449,0.000008632287,0.003489936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982212,0.00044388237,0.00033336208,0.00024361709,0.0004377048,0.000320192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989993,0.0002229806,0.00008292746,0.00010838605,0.00048979395,0.00009662589],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00123007,0.000116007795,0.00010117367,0.00017324754,0.00052932824,0.00037628398,0.00019555276,0.00007578949,0.005850965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021687555,0.00012684285,0.00007281187,0.0008260703,0.00018723944,0.0027100744,0.000005577797,0.00028344692,0.000096128424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013163866,0.00037583744,0.00025346436,0.0000047616854,0.000014785233,5.884921e-7,0.014018097,0.000018709157,0.00006355525,0.9792437,0.0011756924,0.0048176204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004213222,0.000020188732,0.026192002,0.000013755881,0.000019528003,0.000009397682,0.10496122,0.00004288676,0.00002310533,0.371412,0.4966184,0.00026618183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040920344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002792338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8494321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045872247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023408982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W205749200","doi":"10.29173/alr42","title":"The World Needs More Rod Macdonald: The Potential of Big Ideas","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.026702873094160435,"score_gpt":0.359098844574357,"score_spread":0.33239597148019656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W205749200","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021966285,0.009750532,0.000012991155,0.5004179,0.00062489946,0.0002693234,7.875608e-7,0.000008130119,0.4886958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8442885,0.020178812,0.00006905044,0.053123463,0.0009228595,0.000082597595,0.000009958703,0.000015408124,0.0813093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987036,0.00046653522,0.00029032846,0.00008523175,0.00029301594,0.00016127931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762,0.0015718304,0.000225452,0.0003507703,0.00018501119,0.00004692538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001714791,0.00006883696,0.00013029511,0.000020731342,0.00084116514,0.00011193197,0.00043311444,0.000024655123,0.00064901815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016537104,0.000036975634,0.00009124312,0.0010198809,0.00036498648,0.00017222865,0.000031334745,0.00019106615,0.00015769272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011703949,0.000014544128,0.00003743266,0.00003991656,0.000013638424,2.8548982e-8,0.0005720341,3.8324526e-7,0.0000020951907,0.94165653,0.03624425,0.021418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003323039,0.0000042324605,0.00016695145,0.00015223981,0.000059855094,8.601106e-7,0.00027469968,0.0000037014918,0.0000034741706,0.0033137107,0.9959354,0.000051693358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03359995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068431474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016369193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020960871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97283536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058083404","doi":"10.1038/sj.jid.5700196","title":"The Private Side of the Professional Man","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Investigative Dermatology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Dartmouth College","keywords":"Joke; Clothing; White (mutation); Wonder; Art history; White coat; Medicine; Art; History; Psychology; Law; Literature; Political science; Chemistry; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029018635644093113,"score_gpt":0.35047342358502426,"score_spread":0.32145478794093113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058083404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60795695,0.000096724754,0.000020766769,0.37329292,0.00091427594,0.000085340165,0.0000011503611,0.0000031220986,0.017628772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99609333,0.000013214571,0.0004782051,0.0018181009,0.00016773999,0.0000026461478,3.5679437e-7,0.0000030123404,0.0014234013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835277,0.0007655074,0.0004310489,0.000040411356,0.00028693205,0.00012331679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975164,0.0008310272,0.00096941716,0.00008914143,0.0005540302,0.000039982602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007056854,0.000046958197,0.00010497747,0.00004639422,0.00068086135,0.000034309902,0.0003338448,0.000054896656,0.000033993012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023360674,0.00002424406,0.000059119335,0.00038881614,0.0014547522,0.00028193972,0.000027580623,0.00040246572,0.0000055990763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009701242,0.00005483032,0.0106549375,0.000004379329,0.000024733821,0.000003012688,0.005573004,0.000009378288,0.004150249,0.9036707,0.07569373,0.0001513486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018374687,0.000012566652,0.08522662,0.000032959495,0.000018739423,0.00009073989,0.0057800915,0.0000059355175,0.035722136,0.20076528,0.6721088,0.00005233503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026444087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005696694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7029054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039237028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001329339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5360095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058759980","doi":"10.1016/s0924-9338(11)72157-5","title":"Working with cultural diverse persons involved in law and mental health - cultural competency training manual","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Psychiatry","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Cultural competence; Stakeholder; Psychology; Mental health law; Presentation (obstetrics); Public relations; Nursing; Medical education; Medicine; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.1270833059226294,"score_gpt":0.35750380414728444,"score_spread":0.23042049822465505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058759980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41342866,0.00026033865,0.0000065342847,0.021345805,0.0012586577,0.00017979377,0.0000050816734,0.00007172502,0.5634434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885395,0.00003074095,0.0063798763,0.0040364587,0.0002673344,0.0000021914764,0.000016010534,0.000010694128,0.00071717787],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885917,0.00037656995,0.00017296827,0.0001880155,0.0001554191,0.00024784505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996323,0.00001647714,0.00012222581,0.00007750448,0.00003142598,0.000120040124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052571803,0.00009538627,0.00009221656,0.000051715877,0.00084363576,0.00013828746,0.00013250687,0.000019731988,0.00015950196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016223656,0.000078616235,0.000021123746,0.00030182273,0.00032493475,0.0006752362,0.00002505763,0.00030086868,0.00002983699],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002479034,0.000086705026,0.070086114,0.0000047058543,0.000012003911,0.000002433688,0.68347067,1.239773e-7,0.0000033618987,0.23893447,0.006226933,0.0011476675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051280926,0.00007322088,0.031374756,0.00011042291,0.0000055962328,0.0000059542926,0.8145818,0.000002836215,2.8711997e-7,0.00020573667,0.15295637,0.00017020035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040136003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03011391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57511085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005199799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026751906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060698953","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2013.771123","title":"Is access to the profession access to justice? Lessons from Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Legal service; Perception; Political science; Representation (politics); White (mutation); Law; Public relations; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.12712855926517452,"score_gpt":0.5099555952967334,"score_spread":0.3828270360315589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060698953","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23911518,0.00004237402,0.00029123048,0.7288971,0.026510812,0.0002894104,0.00002834397,0.0000074636637,0.004818088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9364811,0.000014988827,0.00016904413,0.054451518,0.004387458,0.000016686732,0.0000032041305,0.000011172426,0.0044648196],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969903,0.0005473673,0.00047233977,0.00012408748,0.0015740623,0.00029183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718064,0.00050833815,0.0006198756,0.00024087059,0.0011966275,0.00025365542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014730059,0.00011580574,0.00012779237,0.00012474645,0.001020139,0.00085027516,0.003046421,0.00007801941,0.00076949084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024818091,0.000064454354,0.00007978089,0.00060701626,0.00004473386,0.0031501038,0.00058035523,0.00081480783,0.00004939393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015189649,0.00016339096,0.02173016,0.0000045765446,0.000078638615,0.000002971475,0.023859292,0.00008284632,0.0005340743,0.008942826,0.93613935,0.008310008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015804233,0.000008362213,0.08518549,0.0002111149,0.000046467616,0.000005003649,0.008097145,0.0000074590903,0.0015676884,0.00047783912,0.9041306,0.000104815794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33431846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20534149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69736594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006273452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003446954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8425385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060830975","doi":"","title":"McGill University Archives - Pilarczyk's Picks Virtual Exhibit: Medals","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Visual arts; Computer graphics (images); Art","score_opus":0.02200565278619571,"score_gpt":0.2997714828986011,"score_spread":0.2777658301124054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060830975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026024435,0.000004645868,0.00057713885,0.050938465,0.0002408081,0.0000841085,0.000021030508,0.000109876244,0.9219995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76400584,0.0000119835895,0.0008879767,0.0008039783,0.00017100545,6.716588e-7,0.000008755299,0.0000031945344,0.2341066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992683,0.00016057437,0.00009764295,0.0001291626,0.0001769836,0.0001673579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993822,0.00033806692,0.000056895136,0.00009865241,0.000060957722,0.00006325269],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024929788,0.00005136241,0.00005667611,0.000093053815,0.00082285405,0.00004280629,0.00015480991,0.00004273317,0.0026433785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018175146,0.000052894757,0.00003246897,0.00040245123,0.0001624052,0.0005719163,0.00002262731,0.00014702631,0.00019212323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054043917,0.000074117794,0.0006315335,5.71429e-7,0.0000040716504,0.0000016809267,0.0016010598,0.0000045208963,0.00029732333,0.9645161,0.030234387,0.0026292496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104915605,0.000011230562,0.0032902432,0.0000017532665,0.0000056067474,4.0571803e-7,0.00813741,0.000005497609,0.00024901493,0.0050919517,0.98302203,0.00007990801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026449041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010833992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95942414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006483525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029671928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064886108","doi":"","title":"Mentor, Mercenary or Melding: An Empirical Enquiry into the Role of the Lawyer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Professional conduct; Law; Legal profession; Political science; Professional responsibility; Legal research; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04134244961920209,"score_gpt":0.4068493810439527,"score_spread":0.3655069314247506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064886108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7984476,0.0034291672,0.00018420146,0.14471784,0.0016679247,0.00029242557,7.8701305e-7,0.000030516234,0.051229514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932717,0.0005552129,0.000055122935,0.0009856093,0.0010841801,0.0000061676533,5.49919e-7,0.000007632477,0.0040337904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977601,0.00061821664,0.00020891456,0.000069690235,0.00040597768,0.00093707873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921143,0.00019850505,0.00019791257,0.00016960806,0.00013306359,0.00008950707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004612555,0.00006681095,0.00007380161,0.000039600283,0.0011600968,0.000088370936,0.0004719665,0.000062626794,0.00046672314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005538279,0.000033780154,0.00006326837,0.00047885434,0.0001940053,0.00092897896,0.000033023633,0.0015192273,0.000018741455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038614024,0.00025535392,0.025997698,9.647014e-7,0.00007397281,6.41926e-8,0.13791266,0.0000017764204,0.00053736725,0.81018996,0.0015131565,0.023478417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009938524,0.00005908272,0.0023259148,0.00000388996,0.000034277517,0.000024741035,0.150552,0.000006253865,0.00022458156,0.08165728,0.7649427,0.000069891474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018786454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006856656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7634295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048197835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057403552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065940923","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100008930","title":"Legal Scholarship in Ontario's English-speaking Common Law Schools","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02874366201158569,"score_gpt":0.29833404675810493,"score_spread":0.26959038474651925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065940923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6475277,0.002502982,0.000008541844,0.045781888,0.0046621882,0.00020259776,0.0000573453,0.000008997164,0.29924777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737655,0.00012748377,0.0005299038,0.011415704,0.0015661212,0.0000056792865,0.000025108442,0.00003548161,0.012529036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969675,0.00044950392,0.0009624383,0.00030953702,0.00021406039,0.0010969435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964105,0.00040132742,0.0006453277,0.00022715467,0.0008875345,0.00142817],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003361642,0.0002841103,0.0005469012,0.00013899291,0.0013621594,0.0010838435,0.0004489913,0.00050874444,0.0007844076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003592435,0.00036710405,0.00034248712,0.0007033127,0.0009837226,0.003643899,0.00002003972,0.003593161,0.000008017365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044235153,0.000043217602,0.0074869324,0.00003096844,0.0000638348,0.0001435762,0.104861416,0.000058184898,0.000005669183,0.88396525,0.0026249473,0.00071155134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006486805,0.00006566985,0.011493673,0.00037569497,0.00009290527,0.00013318977,0.035054076,0.000010586435,0.0000042448874,0.039529283,0.9122173,0.0003746765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9095924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062461025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01141639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066096946","doi":"10.1080/00986281003626532","title":"The Influence of a Psychology and Law Class on Legal Attitudes and Knowledge Structures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching of Psychology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Psychology; Legal psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Class (philosophy); Social psychology; Legal education; School psychology; Biology and political orientation; Politics; Law; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.036278116319367136,"score_gpt":0.47375634528777155,"score_spread":0.43747822896840444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066096946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8573303,0.00008615743,0.0000066368866,0.022683168,0.00055283314,0.00007263241,0.0000019249894,0.000013303451,0.11925305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99747884,0.00005397656,0.00047047564,0.0016974031,0.00010521382,0.0000044545327,5.739624e-7,0.000004344151,0.00018472967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910116,0.00033375813,0.00019410862,0.00015629502,0.000082654384,0.00013202634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881536,0.00069290196,0.00015974272,0.00020606803,0.000084489104,0.000041422976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001204668,0.000061867184,0.00010505665,0.00006207213,0.00049946894,0.000039838327,0.00019862042,0.00011612359,0.000027469709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008757896,0.000046798512,0.000014984602,0.00010095054,0.0014079547,0.00017176263,0.000022785774,0.0007046112,0.0000029478294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002545017,0.000076007294,0.0060543963,0.0000051078287,0.000012055906,1.7740228e-7,0.007961382,5.1461814e-7,0.005341602,0.96911013,0.0015716014,0.009841595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022925841,0.000105471336,0.3901728,0.0000069481757,0.000007638367,0.000009591868,0.0005623749,8.5889155e-7,0.000030466073,0.023892438,0.58491987,0.00006225866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001990547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005365817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94521767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000039691395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008912634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51876676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066837029","doi":"10.1017/s1472669600000797","title":"Local Law Society Libraries","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Yesterday; Law; Law library; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.024845781569686965,"score_gpt":0.3183662182499277,"score_spread":0.29352043668024075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066837029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017568171,0.000010672541,0.04827733,0.06003927,0.00041887318,0.00019508823,0.0000016938577,0.00015499434,0.8907264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9024861,0.00023424924,0.009850761,0.05050833,0.00024663305,0.00007145571,0.000101263955,0.0000067740766,0.036494426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915314,0.00003795276,0.00023096266,0.000060656275,0.00033000557,0.00018727098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957085,0.0000352259,0.00009820224,0.00012783673,0.000105284846,0.000062610474],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041396104,0.00006260852,0.000050311068,0.0000446461,0.0007555257,0.0010510599,0.0001652694,0.000046740908,0.0012360866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024469664,0.00006454385,0.00004647909,0.00055936817,0.00017998845,0.011069227,0.000042443335,0.00014573093,0.0009755472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004062608,0.000017835178,0.000029833396,0.000007858891,0.00001548686,4.240825e-7,0.007568859,0.00006359588,9.5515354e-8,0.8598859,0.113888316,0.018517774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012306347,0.000005687709,0.00026206704,0.000003939087,0.000008120039,6.326282e-7,0.023893345,0.00020552918,0.000004857889,0.0046181357,0.9707926,0.00008202214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031726244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037536208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90231043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009630895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107808424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067476155","doi":"10.1108/08880450310473135","title":"Managing library association finances, two scenarios: American Association of Law Libraries and the Metropolitan Toronto Lawyers Association","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Medical Association","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Metropolitan area; Trade association; Professional association; Accountability; Political science; Accounting; Business; Public administration; Management; Law; Medicine; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.013106348449456762,"score_gpt":0.2843996107897428,"score_spread":0.27129326234028606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067476155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022913264,0.004485761,0.00008604253,0.45692968,0.0012234348,0.0006457606,0.000043073698,0.0003269914,0.513346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92990506,0.0068711624,0.0028222047,0.007053029,0.0006757067,0.00006805899,0.000045447847,0.000045139208,0.05251418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592495,0.0017949863,0.0006263252,0.0003390781,0.0007636209,0.00055106246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941134,0.0034769117,0.0018857918,0.0003400042,0.000113198315,0.000070685935],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031291572,0.00023323207,0.00042136683,0.00009418111,0.001582291,0.001207283,0.000572024,0.0001178386,0.00021530775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018504207,0.00017576381,0.00013115881,0.0012316783,0.0005167088,0.008025093,0.00012264005,0.0005405046,0.0000128953525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004771153,0.000052566775,0.04308029,0.000018928453,0.00012913112,4.8279384e-7,0.007978631,0.000033198314,0.0000018799578,0.92062867,0.02510729,0.0029212348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085605873,0.000045080265,0.006969366,0.000061112514,0.00014612205,4.6213447e-7,0.016142132,0.00027363532,0.00014246735,0.12598398,0.84908414,0.00029542545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018996611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026109212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062358746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053730345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067783931","doi":"10.1353/utq.2006.0002","title":"The Dimensions of Ethics: An Introduction to Ethical Theory (review)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Morality; Relativism; Moral relativism; Normative ethics; Meta-ethics; Moral psychology; Cognitivism (psychology); Moral disengagement; Normative; Social cognitive theory of morality; Philosophy; Sociology; Information ethics; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020668506234466037,"score_gpt":0.32848338661056503,"score_spread":0.307814880376099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067783931","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021024304,0.0020058786,0.0025553135,0.89603955,0.0011647877,0.00056622445,0.000014265246,0.000071212366,0.07655847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803487,0.0016810171,0.0021764191,0.0019308027,0.0006493158,8.21441e-7,0.000017326596,0.0000067097294,0.013188871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987208,0.0007179184,0.000120257646,0.000103758764,0.00024222296,0.000095004274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986599,0.0005107032,0.00011961664,0.00020172869,0.00045743215,0.00005061955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020572834,0.000039402676,0.00007880794,0.000015789123,0.00065861875,0.000013240237,0.00020998847,0.00010257538,0.0006443702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041333577,0.000033022592,0.00003826751,0.000106448046,0.00027179287,0.00039330605,0.000008161178,0.00027553673,0.000014258309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027686998,0.000082565915,0.000023242725,0.000012477905,0.000009418727,2.1351276e-7,0.052819658,0.0000021598264,0.00023268168,0.8523853,0.080047175,0.014357402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005620054,0.000117733405,0.0014982511,0.000018432896,0.000025032004,2.4188958e-7,0.0616369,0.0000019652246,0.000008008529,0.003422299,0.93316716,0.000047765185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122129865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21429726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001011024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034141625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8837159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W206993646","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.709324","title":"Tort Immunity for Nonprofit Volunteers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Immunity; Tort; Sovereign immunity; Business; Medicine; Political science; Law; Immunology; Liability; Immune system","score_opus":0.024002678573168054,"score_gpt":0.37048841862166787,"score_spread":0.3464857400484998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W206993646","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35556364,0.0018981956,0.028851746,0.449737,0.0024659012,0.00081306166,0.0000099502195,0.00015247613,0.16050802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957362,0.00078458124,0.00073970796,0.0008749168,0.0016165324,0.000014508635,0.0000038054723,0.000009368717,0.038594555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982668,0.00010324437,0.00018515723,0.00007927471,0.00020418853,0.0011613179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993183,0.0001241902,0.000110886846,0.00008956719,0.00028581923,0.00007125506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003672914,0.000060448936,0.00006874519,0.00007420128,0.0011670724,0.00015385041,0.0002406624,0.000059669914,0.0003057162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073145033,0.000059550755,0.00006945884,0.0002597766,0.00006315825,0.0008217956,0.000007782567,0.0014862303,0.00009405516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022946177,0.00007167893,0.00058797916,9.879722e-7,0.000045808578,5.3135025e-8,0.004737682,0.00000907286,0.000080694976,0.9482396,0.006111995,0.0400915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023129974,0.00005504057,0.0002182682,0.0000025267925,0.000016222837,0.000014058044,0.021145845,0.00002184653,0.00002901915,0.054034535,0.9241435,0.000087819266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025575256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035492606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9180315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001282167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0101776365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99543375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070748734","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v7n2p150","title":"The Defects of Anti-corruption Literature since 1990 and Revelation of the Legal Awareness in China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Language change; China; Prosperity; Taste; Political science; Meaning (existential); Subject (documents); Law; Aesthetics; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Literature; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.015839505564656967,"score_gpt":0.33572640104253604,"score_spread":0.3198868954778791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070748734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97960484,0.00019920526,0.000037689526,0.014448651,0.00026964696,0.000037195943,0.000002311513,6.489145e-7,0.0053998153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936837,0.00014587602,0.000052109368,0.0001912152,0.00011581322,1.8785973e-7,3.1098327e-7,0.0000014364055,0.00012468385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994066,0.00017047167,0.00019821576,0.000027731949,0.00013556937,0.000061431354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992057,0.00023685562,0.00029554617,0.000047939793,0.00019003896,0.000023908395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009128261,0.000027506172,0.00006706227,0.000030644755,0.00023290025,0.00008940306,0.000061142244,0.000036264046,0.000001566806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056643214,0.000016014708,0.000019381456,0.00017478545,0.00017048138,0.00031737896,0.000008941608,0.00016272692,4.5315858e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029144799,0.00001767735,0.013706898,0.000011185948,0.0000027111867,9.172178e-8,0.0042754146,0.000006118499,0.00022442605,0.981443,0.000051058338,0.00025853212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003575736,0.00007155326,0.6461755,0.00026550816,0.000030157718,0.000018193925,0.0021701327,0.00013738628,0.0005371579,0.052594695,0.29757267,0.00006947238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001948987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009262197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92884827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014187278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016672965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29462984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070837081","doi":"10.7202/1027712ar","title":"Impacts des profils professionnels sur la formation juridique au Québec : d’aujourd’hui à hier","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032938774099105686,"score_gpt":0.32526912945273884,"score_spread":0.29233035535363316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070837081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6726668,0.00034825123,0.0023906075,0.1699029,0.0014969886,0.0005321083,0.00001753273,0.00010423543,0.15254061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.925183,0.0002716236,0.0012299934,0.0011412556,0.0017017382,0.00009150754,0.000029310406,0.000033582503,0.070318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703383,0.0010981115,0.0005635155,0.00028047286,0.00029368975,0.00073037343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727374,0.0010363715,0.00051297667,0.0003394989,0.00047179946,0.00036561713],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002903578,0.00018269768,0.00027218738,0.00015581085,0.0010539625,0.00031056293,0.00033355196,0.00039352855,0.00084986887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00402544,0.00024532192,0.00013455372,0.0010166155,0.00046279133,0.0038480405,0.000047522062,0.0007724698,0.00077306206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041049745,0.00066782587,0.015592729,0.0010213028,0.00006480148,0.000009895367,0.23667036,0.00006306888,0.0010749782,0.6245962,0.03387733,0.086320475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058344525,0.00012877244,0.022304168,0.0010834577,0.00012932176,0.00012427504,0.010602424,0.0010384762,0.0013915019,0.068497434,0.8934889,0.00062782347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11648147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13150905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8596116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021748962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00798764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074135593","doi":"10.1017/s1472669614000395","title":"A ‘Charity’ Case in Point","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Point (geometry); Political science","score_opus":0.020086052457783117,"score_gpt":0.3397234214502975,"score_spread":0.3196373689925144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074135593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048502535,0.0000018716961,0.009045007,0.04673834,0.00041761616,0.00028436893,0.000001182302,0.00006704331,0.93859434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98719454,0.000009562595,0.0024144845,0.006539346,0.00007505764,0.000045717235,0.000014312516,0.0000021513404,0.003704827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992137,0.00010177449,0.0002624883,0.0000572643,0.00020921242,0.0001555633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996041,0.000049314862,0.00009519489,0.00012479865,0.00007755681,0.000049038426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001343128,0.000049780723,0.00005026544,0.00025592785,0.00026514794,0.00043092755,0.000100731195,0.000032925956,0.0005146738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022432959,0.000053311203,0.000017916413,0.0005818121,0.000034982688,0.004706155,0.000028539036,0.00014809422,0.00060550054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026780717,0.000022730412,0.00010833221,0.000012264685,0.0000034471661,0.0000069468583,0.010251655,0.000059427988,1.13622576e-7,0.9452462,0.013397233,0.030888928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017816824,0.000006723214,0.00073184783,0.0000058362252,0.0000035315882,0.000007671284,0.012404874,0.00060530455,0.0000013844149,0.0027899507,0.98319554,0.00006918281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008585008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029438434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98234427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011520632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005425152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080105138","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2008.9959788","title":"Legal education's mission","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal education; Legal education; Scholarship; Political science; Diversity (politics); Liberal democracy; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Higher education; Liberal arts education; Politics","score_opus":0.0714253491952251,"score_gpt":0.39607574564848375,"score_spread":0.32465039645325866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080105138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036358148,0.000058872993,0.000011895918,0.14043364,0.00051508617,0.00008211633,2.5101082e-7,0.000050998744,0.82248896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7930229,0.00001486873,0.000166135,0.004920763,0.00061079784,0.0000070961446,0.0000022890347,0.0000041562002,0.20125104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936444,0.00019384756,0.00008081813,0.00007205472,0.00017673973,0.00011212126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957144,0.00008027364,0.00004547453,0.00016146153,0.00009140968,0.000049938415],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045504322,0.000039223763,0.0000356825,0.000015512902,0.0013623447,0.00007270718,0.00017874225,0.00003870629,0.0021044896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023893728,0.000027550515,0.000022295022,0.00023618597,0.0002569801,0.00043407446,0.00001097334,0.00022601518,0.00049127004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016720335,0.00008331917,0.00020921428,3.3371606e-7,0.0000024728836,1.175055e-7,0.016949903,3.4041676e-7,0.000022557564,0.75781155,0.2233551,0.0015634445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031506865,0.0000027625142,0.00079444086,0.0000018538601,0.0000040228956,0.0000037787809,0.0047838404,0.0000013887266,0.000030176489,0.0027236147,0.9915786,0.00004404649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02289138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077957043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76822346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049265593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010260048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085125841","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2013.1.6","title":"The Copyright Modernization Act: A Guide for Post-Secondary Instructors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Modernization theory; Jurisprudence; Fair use; Sociology; Political science; Work (physics); The Internet; Public relations; Humanities; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.036761741843121,"score_gpt":0.35370091944197546,"score_spread":0.3169391775988545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085125841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6678887,0.0013425337,0.0015974946,0.3104821,0.0018620493,0.0009667872,0.00001216755,0.000023567118,0.01582457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98871225,0.00003088802,0.0006573187,0.00091674406,0.0003635463,0.000020982372,0.0000037945663,0.000011414821,0.009283042],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852026,0.00078661146,0.00021716798,0.000069867085,0.00015134046,0.00025477353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961982,0.002766775,0.00026373815,0.00010446821,0.0005019919,0.00016483576],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009156142,0.00006522979,0.00006696778,0.00007170332,0.021839354,0.0016669809,0.00039125988,0.000058339796,0.000115002586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015935738,0.000034836157,0.000057949608,0.000107578824,0.00023959059,0.00086013065,0.000008170254,0.0019168751,0.0000033991278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037975555,0.000010450027,0.0070118555,0.000020707483,0.00016604895,2.5602736e-7,0.15816292,0.00060457684,0.00026502743,0.2993295,0.018498685,0.51589197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001490994,0.000034218425,0.0076176045,0.000021112166,0.000031348376,0.000011969103,0.02808468,0.00039598686,0.000008202228,0.014013946,0.9495643,0.00006758326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076240696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09532601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93106556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102411206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019980923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087773398","doi":"10.1017/cls.2014.1","title":"Legal Inquiry: A Liberal Arts Experiment in Demystifying Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal arts education; Vocabulary; The arts; Legal education; Law; Sociology; Legal profession; Critical thinking; Political science; Pedagogy; Higher education; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045078839757631106,"score_gpt":0.342730155533635,"score_spread":0.2976513157760039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087773398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6871841,0.00044567743,0.00012340331,0.052682314,0.002358555,0.00021571005,0.000012168621,0.000014332284,0.25696373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98196566,0.00005186378,0.0006380496,0.015434383,0.0007661725,0.000007488734,0.000004766588,0.000016345475,0.0011152443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998511,0.00020505086,0.00042858295,0.00017193872,0.00011960638,0.00056378474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804956,0.00027013916,0.00025535468,0.00012503483,0.00025922974,0.0010406555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021400235,0.00012677851,0.00026669112,0.00008387983,0.0008738905,0.00037756417,0.00021823442,0.0001660622,0.00016542301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003792179,0.000148005,0.00013739635,0.0002916366,0.0005386162,0.0010135702,0.0000103163475,0.00065225945,0.0000029372939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021071073,0.000011498131,0.00016458066,0.00001043913,0.000021979095,0.00001600926,0.1602503,0.0000110543315,0.000018901475,0.8363331,0.002475,0.0006850479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043312734,0.000050421393,0.00045902378,0.00008259952,0.000021344022,0.00005149483,0.06523279,0.00003470947,0.000013588671,0.013090917,0.9203258,0.00020416956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4762695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93002725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9178508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000997164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025173414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6721347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W208836607","doi":"","title":"26. All That Glitters Is Not Gold: The False Promise of Victim Impact Statements","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Harm; Criminology; Criminal justice; Dignity; Autonomy; Skepticism; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Political science; Culpability; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.08439172441855633,"score_gpt":0.4140174841036777,"score_spread":0.3296257596851214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W208836607","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22371975,0.00018670801,0.0004891311,0.64501274,0.005673234,0.0025628787,0.0007523823,0.00022600072,0.121377185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94762415,0.00011508628,0.0003369617,0.04731488,0.000693345,0.00024382317,0.00023032517,0.000025595531,0.0034158262],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972714,0.00048668645,0.00050874683,0.00025992878,0.0009428416,0.00053036184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781054,0.00041591557,0.0005844563,0.00042513703,0.00048262818,0.00028131544],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021423677,0.0002089877,0.00021832791,0.00015234176,0.0007390968,0.0003956482,0.0005028593,0.00012644789,0.0120936055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004855398,0.00016406065,0.0001426953,0.00068346603,0.00030701808,0.025507051,0.000074093856,0.0003294666,0.0013330076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029963924,0.0017482111,0.010697686,0.00006490342,0.00046162665,0.000003181405,0.057700932,0.000034593704,0.0015716016,0.34090033,0.57880896,0.0077083404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065110123,0.00007774303,0.06440821,0.000041374784,0.00009782787,0.0000045347037,0.010036491,0.0000096063595,0.0028034837,0.0010548556,0.9205046,0.00031012486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027506456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010547619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72390443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028987683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005611703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089150328","doi":"10.1080/03050710902726931","title":"Provincial law reform agencies in Canada: are they really that different from the Scottish Law Commission?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Mandate; Political science; Law reform; Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Public administration; State (computer science); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04327491989774831,"score_gpt":0.31085825604174966,"score_spread":0.26758333614400137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089150328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0423354,0.00015410043,0.0000017241022,0.4441271,0.0005776585,0.00045954785,0.00010617423,0.000056943773,0.51218134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94824725,0.00007533473,0.00007693878,0.050326187,0.00034618247,0.000031273168,0.000057311277,0.000011547193,0.0008279509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975445,0.0006618446,0.00042273343,0.0002614651,0.0006349931,0.0004744654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821955,0.0006328364,0.0003281565,0.00046855194,0.00014151003,0.00020938902],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008939195,0.00017828956,0.00025538518,0.0000207176,0.0019199505,0.00030119804,0.00072555774,0.00010954061,0.00068803626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018366509,0.00012783472,0.00004678071,0.00020071056,0.00025932534,0.00019494849,0.00007050802,0.000769315,0.00003261611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032845943,0.00011303006,0.0031283258,0.0000050407384,0.0000073570836,0.000007633761,0.008098878,0.0000016767009,0.000003327455,0.91662186,0.07118442,0.0007955755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002184378,0.00002322943,0.053017285,0.00007162141,0.000009754601,6.8478454e-7,0.010966761,0.0000026038856,0.00002058365,0.007022994,0.928482,0.00016402667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9095989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020062719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025157463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089800841","doi":"10.3138/cjls.26.2.227","title":"Introduction: The Disenchantment of Critical Legal Thought?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology of law; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Jurisprudence; Legal realism; Sociology; Law; Legal science; Normative; Legal positivism; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03536358666149566,"score_gpt":0.3180967834247978,"score_spread":0.28273319676330216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089800841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25691321,0.0013014587,0.0003364128,0.46138537,0.0069297366,0.00036310017,0.00008474225,0.000014972308,0.272671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913068,0.00013015313,0.0006361819,0.0037229324,0.0013818641,0.000003820476,0.0000023348778,0.000009039125,0.0028069124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989111,0.00016758149,0.00035146243,0.00011618669,0.000110645145,0.00034303672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981512,0.00024920062,0.00022716465,0.0001461289,0.00059269357,0.0006336364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015855931,0.000086124426,0.00018040904,0.00004147261,0.0009026802,0.000108810455,0.00023245596,0.00009544479,0.00082925515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074080646,0.00007564182,0.00015475338,0.00026815882,0.0011776548,0.00064081885,0.000008305772,0.00047100242,0.0000019744884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024071733,0.000017928962,0.00006732609,0.000012936645,0.00003970758,0.000008126171,0.10664081,5.5374716e-7,0.000005591771,0.884965,0.0077769,0.0004627262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001439292,0.00007166775,0.00077641604,0.000024072242,0.000084313,0.0000890599,0.118457995,0.0000045896018,0.000025317726,0.018936947,0.86126983,0.000115852235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21221237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58346933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.866028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034296562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028601433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9079762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091752406","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2001.tb00167.x","title":"Casaubon's ghosts: the haunting of legal scholarship","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal formalism; Mainstream; Legal realism; Law; Pride; Political science; Sociology; Legal profession; Comparative law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.13637137564472432,"score_gpt":0.456736296431363,"score_spread":0.3203649207866387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091752406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3367737,0.0022782807,0.000022022094,0.26935074,0.0012368445,0.00021220905,0.0000026487169,0.000067103974,0.39005646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811022,0.00046960407,0.00017247994,0.0018518805,0.0005083884,0.000018712339,8.6128955e-7,0.000005855893,0.015869992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886245,0.00021194505,0.00022760595,0.000123851,0.00034793693,0.00022622725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856395,0.00061485596,0.00016572572,0.00015390867,0.00046753575,0.00003404336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014278889,0.00007683028,0.00012600594,0.000051577317,0.0013292476,0.00020716083,0.00023272252,0.00004034592,0.00015657643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00454518,0.00005511525,0.000050569695,0.0007946512,0.00043049868,0.0010913096,0.000053572796,0.000349201,0.00005383428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017230575,0.000089664216,0.037707914,0.000011739094,0.00012674814,0.000007646163,0.040587008,0.000004189243,0.000103667626,0.89161533,0.022183148,0.0075457427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007445167,0.000012365862,0.008601683,0.000015416792,0.000019429728,0.0000032382554,0.04285315,0.0000010134465,0.00007163928,0.0013065398,0.9469714,0.00006968394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012396703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010304942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92478824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008047815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028819605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091934849","doi":"10.1177/000494410504900208","title":"‘Silly, Soft and Otherwise Suspect’: Doctoral Education as Risky Business","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Rigour; Corporate governance; Relation (database); False accusation; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Law; Criminology; Media studies; Management; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.043673220688284047,"score_gpt":0.41154999536347653,"score_spread":0.3678767746751925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091934849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7310205,0.00034016592,0.000046607518,0.23686448,0.0033456807,0.00017487998,0.0000014849688,0.00001792462,0.028188258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647946,0.00015129626,0.0023806922,0.0012957086,0.003147259,0.0000066968246,0.0000061119263,0.000011020435,0.02820663],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880224,0.0001682441,0.00041839082,0.00012095553,0.00030738223,0.00018277403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765563,0.00011205507,0.000571207,0.0001250961,0.0013143228,0.0002216889],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081429334,0.00010115969,0.0001232047,0.00027517567,0.00035197203,0.0003378195,0.0001853644,0.00009024487,0.0018350707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011764361,0.00009982834,0.00004123343,0.00071004377,0.00014917983,0.0020874476,0.000007251014,0.00030946956,0.00010284961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007298287,0.0018128168,0.02913692,0.00003492363,0.00006305351,0.0000015246762,0.05215431,0.000030720996,0.0005667956,0.12558113,0.339898,0.45064682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016106784,0.000036136127,0.05177458,0.000059669856,0.0000453696,0.00008002917,0.02245205,6.1421747e-7,0.0001520899,0.0044470048,0.9206567,0.00013468857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030105421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006272232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5807587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025497738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073772315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094997892","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0024","title":"My Continuing Legal Education","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Nothing; Banner; Legal education; Law; Media studies; History; Political science; Sociology; Art history; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012600813934692104,"score_gpt":0.30020376384300207,"score_spread":0.28760294990831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094997892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024099434,0.00026311827,0.0002781138,0.026230557,0.0005676225,0.00004618344,0.0000011662958,0.000015245423,0.94849855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97658795,0.00017465463,0.004516082,0.00030123017,0.0005687201,2.6414298e-8,0.0000011602845,0.0000020041764,0.017848162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950117,0.000093282906,0.00008518289,0.000050797345,0.00017135589,0.00009823879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993287,0.000041483916,0.00015667765,0.000054689852,0.00032916066,0.00008929667],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003932675,0.000032265627,0.000053650812,0.000017768181,0.00075466564,0.00008540786,0.0001622221,0.000037859707,0.005565108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000770778,0.000039454284,0.00004063143,0.000042650827,0.00012005195,0.002524255,0.000010542827,0.00016074006,0.000027643797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015012137,0.00013371992,0.00024061132,0.0000013578892,0.000014223394,8.491753e-7,0.042029057,0.000005520127,0.00007556086,0.8551411,0.028517794,0.07382521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012020343,0.000009071108,0.0006428862,0.000010893723,0.000012438174,0.000005424945,0.05689343,0.0000039379966,0.000013678057,0.00017407569,0.9420713,0.000042614196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19176167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35150108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95248854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003769423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006601069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095394123","doi":"10.1006/ijsl.2001.0148","title":"Lay Knowledge of Courts in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Sociology of Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisdiction; Law; Institution; Nothing; Political science; Dispute resolution; Sociology; Public institution","score_opus":0.04197494445587836,"score_gpt":0.4016116980051777,"score_spread":0.35963675354929936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095394123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8561908,0.0001435,0.000010809212,0.07964409,0.002614888,0.000029778212,0.000004424497,8.0087517e-7,0.06136089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843776,0.00006929135,0.000061352424,0.0007666183,0.00020000788,4.2523217e-7,4.1766097e-7,0.0000017018644,0.0004624505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991237,0.0002285443,0.00033749372,0.000031010313,0.00021145158,0.00006783473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982826,0.00043576723,0.00050892215,0.000046852747,0.00070468785,0.00002116005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007525627,0.000029465662,0.000098265664,0.00005124502,0.000053056134,0.000005112025,0.00045217268,0.000040065326,0.00028008677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000603407,0.00002237107,0.00005218465,0.00008036964,0.00045294437,0.00017002157,0.000022332115,0.0002268205,0.0000013365548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055829845,0.00019171876,0.1001028,0.0000030821202,0.00014434608,0.0000066669636,0.03998305,0.00013979779,0.0004114226,0.847885,0.009826701,0.0012495951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006597573,0.00003262743,0.08577481,0.00007747992,0.000021081529,0.000040813098,0.01636293,0.000011105237,0.00044364034,0.045977995,0.8505178,0.00007998049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6429594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8102172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8406911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030748252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034355961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096119495","doi":"","title":"A Joint Initiative of Community Foundations of Canada and the Law Commission of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Joint (building); Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.06393039256607216,"score_gpt":0.33773940678921066,"score_spread":0.2738090142231385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096119495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1343419,0.000010292582,0.000042543274,0.055355966,0.000084082545,0.000113156275,0.000023958999,0.0000022161566,0.8100259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774206,0.0000018160603,0.00012336792,0.00061263476,0.000010009169,0.0000026294758,0.0000053122444,0.000001110439,0.0015010562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911964,0.0004012134,0.00020762984,0.000020575819,0.0001950128,0.000055928183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826545,0.0010404268,0.00020090274,0.00009756909,0.00037377398,0.00002187477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070993626,0.000026555626,0.000082509876,0.000014145714,0.0005488266,0.000009803856,0.00008112256,0.0000139077,0.00023126385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006397337,0.000018828123,0.000009036451,0.00023639576,0.00040764207,0.000109957364,0.000017291743,0.00011984037,3.1061603e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051042466,0.000037579954,0.0004654469,0.0000069510165,0.000007467802,2.1953312e-8,0.009920509,0.000007776716,0.000035755194,0.9613287,0.028136585,0.000048124544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010485474,0.000034578658,0.09262177,0.00003944423,0.00004454307,7.8906703e-7,0.30068648,0.000064787186,0.0047401013,0.053613156,0.54695004,0.00015575944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99997234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9077155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007329185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006056555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096436924","doi":"10.1017/s1472669606000387","title":"Researching European Law – a Basic Introduction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Law; Library science; Basis (linear algebra); Political science; Law library; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01921464535844978,"score_gpt":0.32694611449563976,"score_spread":0.30773146913718996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096436924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008414021,0.000003527417,0.0051345685,0.08383516,0.00055350416,0.00022609638,0.0000019553747,0.00013683081,0.90926695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96155894,0.0000130371445,0.0030133792,0.004121279,0.001561819,0.00004462472,0.0001444671,0.0000071112017,0.029535316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988454,0.00020220412,0.00027104502,0.00008028524,0.00040771443,0.00019335296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995067,0.000027158409,0.000116512674,0.00015758179,0.00015205515,0.00003995716],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016188861,0.00005709635,0.000041654846,0.00019461488,0.00091104617,0.0010981737,0.00015577552,0.000018979928,0.0006023867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080653204,0.000060733662,0.000024724137,0.00056475966,0.00008319501,0.006392227,0.00004100774,0.00018899888,0.001500605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003747779,0.000019788627,0.000016342117,0.000009091827,0.0000050320946,5.5889166e-7,0.0016413105,0.00014132741,0.0000021852366,0.8298669,0.15749148,0.0108022485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011702083,0.0000059517793,0.0014240582,0.000003725969,0.0000056487893,5.3749176e-7,0.0032775959,0.000049802384,0.000010330188,0.0033521526,0.9916811,0.00007205608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01162189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010646596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96071756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013436186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049033155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101512610","doi":"10.1017/s1472669603001051","title":"Law Librarianship in Bermuda; or Even If You're On an Island, No Man Is an Island","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Plan (archaeology); Master plan; Slipping; History; Law; Political science; Library science; Management; Archaeology; Engineering; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.044614564305093536,"score_gpt":0.3446729922761716,"score_spread":0.30005842797107807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101512610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010576339,0.0000021682324,0.0005335182,0.044279035,0.00059121667,0.00063988403,0.000033075594,0.000109541055,0.9432352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94589573,0.00003490145,0.001554352,0.039658517,0.0003038241,0.00008177584,0.0003170772,0.000011646256,0.012142168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985554,0.000099588404,0.0004218268,0.00016042843,0.00047902463,0.00028370306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999256,0.000032911885,0.0001772365,0.00030403497,0.00010869935,0.000121074016],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067520555,0.00013395686,0.0001071587,0.00028883637,0.0005003942,0.0012543468,0.000331354,0.000099631805,0.00219219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005453433,0.00012349316,0.000030125133,0.00073655,0.000066888395,0.014120239,0.000036454512,0.00028667474,0.0011883893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010659757,0.0001885193,0.0001492827,0.000029999717,0.000015678232,0.000004138667,0.058037385,0.0007007219,3.5867598e-7,0.917402,0.016527243,0.0068380726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072958146,0.00012668017,0.0018281263,0.000028003997,0.0000102527465,5.285207e-7,0.018025432,0.00018894716,0.000009278821,0.005017471,0.9738482,0.00018749657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010565233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029647963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.957321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020407684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022213791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103321676","doi":"","title":"Improving Stability and Performance of an International Network of Free Access Legal Information Systems","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of information, law and technology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Legal research; Business; Internationalization; Public relations; Political science; Law; International trade","score_opus":0.013745942977514851,"score_gpt":0.3139568863922164,"score_spread":0.30021094341470156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103321676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97437733,0.0000409785,0.0020868916,0.0022622733,0.00063622725,0.000118773496,0.000007711533,0.000015302172,0.020454533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819636,0.000086557404,0.0014917448,0.00012490466,0.00008840455,0.0000012133588,0.0000048660604,0.0000012238223,0.0000046924474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987589,0.00002661436,0.00082524965,0.000028470073,0.00025434716,0.00010640314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680805,0.000094542505,0.0012898603,0.000105404906,0.0016580533,0.000044079057],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002289372,0.000049790622,0.00012854964,0.0002694653,0.00018394846,0.00016219282,0.00028640902,0.00011860849,0.00001538664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078920595,0.00004455943,0.0000139122,0.00045610193,0.000286309,0.0153282145,0.000052850082,0.00021051083,3.4043939e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008653012,0.000031966876,0.03316161,0.00008547924,0.000024712945,1.3510156e-7,0.0038989217,0.000044161447,0.000040969368,0.9375485,0.00014249714,0.024934493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002953192,0.0012919124,0.08558722,0.0002608887,0.00009396866,0.00026868115,0.06207675,0.0036900777,0.005689841,0.010825247,0.8268065,0.00045572448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001326914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037133222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9267233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004891217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031800644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103977024","doi":"10.53300/001c.6177","title":"Australian Law Students’ Values: How They Impact on Ethical Behaviour","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Equity (law); Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Project commissioning; Resource (disambiguation); Law; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Publishing; Public administration","score_opus":0.0647866432713611,"score_gpt":0.5082380481448364,"score_spread":0.44345140487347534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103977024","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01401678,0.002203887,0.000004243497,0.8488798,0.0012681239,0.0008078983,0.000008903045,0.00009913279,0.13271125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87126106,0.004640669,0.00045692435,0.078822725,0.0013428171,0.00014761309,0.000050946335,0.000017137865,0.043260116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767447,0.0006694475,0.00033006934,0.00027366413,0.0007538888,0.00029846042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984978,0.00020155784,0.00024149004,0.0003782449,0.00041772326,0.00026320445],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019621146,0.00016928073,0.00022218392,0.00007816724,0.00060528103,0.0006841003,0.00046729462,0.00018628356,0.0034190326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001118015,0.00014040514,0.00015710034,0.00053444155,0.00013057742,0.0010089208,0.000018882438,0.0010649202,0.0011113852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004467691,0.0007845973,0.0016393451,0.00008269879,0.00002230179,3.7660337e-7,0.0048587327,0.0000020231219,0.0000032522382,0.5231105,0.44939023,0.02010144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006858069,0.000035017765,0.0056254645,0.00046853474,0.00006319951,0.0000033175322,0.0014186659,2.6333808e-7,0.000006690267,0.00042476133,0.99171793,0.00016758386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009419529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017052144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85724425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042899628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024100014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104367869","doi":"10.5539/hes.v1n2p73","title":"On Cultivation of Characteristic Talents in Law in Institutes of Technology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Competition (biology); Face (sociological concept); Resource (disambiguation); Law; Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Sociology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.15574575432462687,"score_gpt":0.4454658073598526,"score_spread":0.28972005303522574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104367869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9391938,0.00020346144,0.0000014620219,0.005255371,0.001268036,0.00014214491,0.0000015025051,0.0000120136365,0.05392224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982786,0.00010530798,0.0002885285,0.00022668843,0.000037839876,0.00006915139,0.0000035678931,0.0000028190666,0.0009874717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936193,0.000060165545,0.00028771764,0.00009657326,0.00011140982,0.000082178056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922025,0.00011269357,0.00020968287,0.00009477888,0.00035104004,0.000011541628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024710747,0.00005012274,0.00012487064,0.00037979215,0.000062144776,0.000004524527,0.00008442636,0.00005303734,0.00013578158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034441415,0.000049380076,0.000011746909,0.0010142293,0.00035640804,0.00029000023,0.000012730189,0.00010075016,0.000012736256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001041311,0.00058369344,0.06450928,0.000019479929,0.000008926216,8.409975e-8,0.02044082,2.7486345e-7,0.00013419228,0.9132778,0.0003487982,0.0006662271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026467742,0.00005298072,0.8248669,0.00021666542,0.000010474686,1.3999178e-7,0.04217583,1.659472e-7,0.0013573997,0.043015845,0.08792102,0.00011788714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033413786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009443778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87026197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009150197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029347578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5051187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105190709","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12060","title":"Controversy about the Role of Children's Lawyers: Advocate or Best Interests Guardian? Comparing Practices in Two Canadian Jurisdictions with Different Policies for Lawyers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Citation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06301285000555393,"score_gpt":0.4044794314693569,"score_spread":0.34146658146380293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105190709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4027564,0.041613974,0.00006656965,0.35928044,0.0009419525,0.0085978955,0.00014565776,0.00009007882,0.18650703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982119,0.0122462455,0.000111471345,0.0044108573,0.0001514034,0.00041259816,0.00002351025,0.000012856034,0.00051205535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998609,0.00027176412,0.00038247072,0.00017771799,0.0002272288,0.00033181146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979837,0.000695365,0.0005406557,0.0002620859,0.0003709192,0.00014730715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069514726,0.000137987,0.0003198328,0.000119488606,0.00046017455,0.00021315379,0.00034021132,0.000039452923,0.00017681478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010822364,0.000086698965,0.00006828795,0.0005613919,0.00021498463,0.0007187043,0.000019146539,0.00029654708,0.00003953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016118838,0.0011616589,0.45821404,0.0009194554,0.0008917317,0.0000025754157,0.067119725,0.00009754858,0.00008262319,0.23499252,0.16842254,0.067934394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003894199,0.00006287146,0.07902503,0.00125389,0.00016990014,0.000002605692,0.0165389,0.00004303011,0.0000055581054,0.00018020972,0.90215254,0.00017606303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7885646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84763587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73372996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019684479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014276003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35393372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106245212","doi":"","title":"Should legal professional privilege be limited to exclude in-house lawyers under South African criminal law? : comment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Legal profession; Common law; Criminal law","score_opus":0.1794632987499983,"score_gpt":0.3903842138655562,"score_spread":0.2109209151155579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106245212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75246316,0.000096691605,0.0030050273,0.11173358,0.0049744495,0.0008892492,0.000070666625,0.00014861349,0.12661856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783174,0.000006773719,0.0051934733,0.014933381,0.00079705974,0.000022018288,0.000002611126,0.000047707264,0.0006795989],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956939,0.0007800006,0.0010417369,0.00034006158,0.0013682997,0.00077597355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633783,0.0005845412,0.0009068944,0.00031334505,0.0010620382,0.00079533417],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025600225,0.00030163093,0.00043586586,0.0006384413,0.00078262243,0.00024395714,0.0008518876,0.00017007682,0.0007164109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017534759,0.00027523012,0.00017186008,0.0012848129,0.00049409317,0.00114124,0.0001161003,0.0014290304,0.00006779642],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009981835,0.00084497285,0.000536455,0.00008508612,0.00006462926,0.00010966256,0.7747476,0.00008044774,0.00007569897,0.2170981,0.005007029,0.00035209808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000686361,0.00045260455,0.0035576215,0.00012585988,0.00093876396,0.000036365498,0.8897504,0.00000917546,0.00008693435,0.00046101515,0.10352049,0.0003743938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023869036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001589839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2258542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045402296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002313168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W210677777","doi":"","title":"Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Legal Education in Pakistan: A Quest for Innovation in Study of Law to Mend Attitudes of Law Professionals Towards Litigants","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Therapeutic jurisprudence; Law; Economic Justice; Magistrate; Legal education; Jurisprudence; Political science; Drug court; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05206838489192681,"score_gpt":0.4699135574155476,"score_spread":0.41784517252362074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W210677777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886613,0.00032743937,0.00009839828,0.0069406303,0.00016760756,0.0006196841,0.0000019918075,0.00000448185,0.0031785003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984516,0.00019230726,0.00015557322,0.00044764555,0.00008023021,0.000050558538,0.0000022081342,0.0000064336627,0.0006134458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832916,0.00023045969,0.0005595777,0.00013184056,0.000302096,0.0004468914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893415,0.00014291082,0.00030416637,0.0000772848,0.00050979876,0.000031673084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031181232,0.00007259502,0.00015528208,0.00027248036,0.00025934284,0.000037060465,0.00014373305,0.000053008116,0.0000112678335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021571787,0.00006884729,0.000015586591,0.0008327514,0.00010126357,0.0007212315,0.000013100784,0.00058413896,4.916979e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000686174,0.0013279096,0.01300445,0.000010719716,0.000017559065,2.5368416e-7,0.024460662,0.000003086988,0.00035897052,0.9566637,0.000015426092,0.004068624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00408927,0.0027685876,0.36045608,0.00048065564,0.000058889054,0.000071157236,0.2622551,0.000013520665,0.0014251705,0.33061826,0.037142027,0.0006213023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020229409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12505394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62604547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004321036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011463026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99414104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106932878","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2014.885317","title":"Medical-Legal Partnership in Medical Education: Pathways and Opportunities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Medicine","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Family Medicine","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Political science; Medicine; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.1029641662165741,"score_gpt":0.4159105471434145,"score_spread":0.3129463809268404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106932878","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041275106,0.00072213635,0.00010846465,0.6926066,0.0017293853,0.000062248844,2.2543479e-7,0.000011605351,0.2634842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679889,0.0011806283,0.0001295325,0.023374394,0.004178851,0.0000043012283,0.0000021762164,0.000007409137,0.0031337985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967584,0.0005737202,0.0007194353,0.00010267878,0.0016387595,0.00020699992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973437,0.0009523199,0.00040047293,0.000105028455,0.0004823209,0.00071615813],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080650775,0.000093670154,0.00027366763,0.00033371695,0.000178409,0.000077200566,0.00029592338,0.00015490937,0.0036753912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023602692,0.00007119536,0.00003167437,0.0003814171,0.00063199777,0.00090785656,0.000021569054,0.0008845548,0.0000062689674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027371689,0.00018496328,0.001980873,0.000018855115,0.000012649097,0.00006303803,0.010687555,1.8249749e-7,0.000005310022,0.8164648,0.07723479,0.09331964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060709607,0.0001495462,0.0019256475,0.00034665636,0.00001721685,0.00022707667,0.014271429,0.00003083205,0.0000023880255,0.003316282,0.97902876,0.00007704978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019473585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016404574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9267138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007977517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008660442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99723536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107390922","doi":"10.7448/ias.16.3.18726","title":"Access to justice: evaluating law, health and human rights programmes in Kenya","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research","funders":"Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Medicine; Human rights; Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Environmental health; Political science","score_opus":0.10084516518324158,"score_gpt":0.49896489135303407,"score_spread":0.3981197261697925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107390922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7317754,0.000039033832,0.000054631037,0.257089,0.0011625447,0.00025888107,0.0000013030286,0.000006765576,0.009612487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841228,0.000010478048,0.0044733007,0.009645396,0.0005575025,0.000010797615,7.353667e-7,0.0000036958154,0.0011752787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986789,0.00015921968,0.00036694566,0.00007622013,0.00058463484,0.0001340809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985842,0.00021533754,0.00040755008,0.000062813866,0.00062147295,0.00010861641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018994086,0.000052698473,0.00009148319,0.000049385806,0.00068036054,0.0006056214,0.00051948865,0.00003545061,0.00022926221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005715699,0.00003663611,0.00007671194,0.00032176427,0.000095648385,0.0012412284,0.0000835044,0.00034200563,0.0000060890416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018267572,0.00047036496,0.054177634,0.00003315769,0.00016442488,6.606798e-7,0.10711412,0.00013904662,0.0005112947,0.6011691,0.22258078,0.013621157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009225287,0.00028156195,0.06337693,0.0002705052,0.00004249778,0.000018316641,0.034407392,0.00022377349,0.000120863246,0.0861056,0.81400317,0.00022683846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011759428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00272601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59142244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031294487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004842368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99482137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108347716","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1483","title":"Securing Accountability through Commissions of Inquiry: A Role for the Law Commission of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Public administration; Discretion; Accountability; Law; Incentive; Political science; Government (linguistics); Politics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.08394092837190328,"score_gpt":0.39724349330661224,"score_spread":0.313302564934709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108347716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074570253,0.00024053165,0.001008122,0.06778511,0.00092945347,0.00028125633,0.000021521413,0.0000111566715,0.9222658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770814,0.00005819864,0.0008740367,0.00069729466,0.00027841795,0.000007344816,0.0000018939365,0.000006241426,0.0003684087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987705,0.00019211555,0.00036137697,0.00007765538,0.00039596608,0.0002023816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792314,0.00091730803,0.00036151952,0.00018715324,0.0005160203,0.00009486063],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001347979,0.0000676152,0.00013221211,0.000014311415,0.0020982078,0.00008407459,0.0003378807,0.00005581553,0.00054602645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050747686,0.000048550733,0.00006389537,0.00024419496,0.000294792,0.0005587803,0.000028746615,0.00037674294,5.453412e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035069294,0.000116673174,0.00077596604,0.00000885512,0.000025351741,3.8729493e-7,0.018595334,0.00007247763,0.00011999304,0.972219,0.0075345743,0.0004963464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022235155,0.000021231177,0.0005118064,0.000035144403,0.00002606297,0.000010238708,0.04149794,0.000041583877,0.0003568652,0.05773006,0.89948225,0.0000644691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96183145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98690224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013871868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015577949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111504734","doi":"10.1089/1533129041492277","title":"What's Right and Wrong with Democracy in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Politics; Law; Download; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.011403205049991321,"score_gpt":0.3188849695822454,"score_spread":0.30748176453225406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111504734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69953096,0.00027111988,0.000053172324,0.23741806,0.00046279508,0.00008643523,0.0000034123307,0.000010311582,0.062163763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99405926,0.0010109941,0.00016218521,0.0036240728,0.0005761422,0.0000016037224,0.0000011779161,0.00000563604,0.0005589164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992506,0.00007372436,0.00015708942,0.00007678446,0.00017414684,0.00026766426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994566,0.000083846266,0.00008911353,0.000039727263,0.00012665076,0.00020406434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022784871,0.0000645849,0.000074070645,0.00011942581,0.0012548025,0.0006060791,0.00004484923,0.000034268836,0.000047059748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000120157696,0.000056008794,0.0000081067255,0.00030208778,0.000119924895,0.001247467,0.0000061587275,0.00034024968,0.000002051181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032353921,0.000014605927,0.0008985905,0.0000023829516,0.0000067171727,0.0000054799284,0.002472672,0.0000139126805,0.000002545272,0.99482274,0.00017923216,0.0015778948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061987975,0.00006538405,0.014249414,0.000062760075,0.0000138077685,0.00039422628,0.010836033,0.000008192916,0.00007338737,0.28431013,0.6891805,0.00018628617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9847986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99205583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7105126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007667367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057118996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113186760","doi":"","title":"Ethics and Leadership in Times of Austerity: Ontario's Courts and \"Justice on Target\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Austerity; Argument (complex analysis); Service (business); Public sector; Public relations; Political science; Law; Business; Marketing; Medicine","score_opus":0.2963253455218431,"score_gpt":0.4059184257017706,"score_spread":0.10959308017992753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113186760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21514131,0.00003235276,0.00011509429,0.19003735,0.0002977921,0.00012749634,8.658598e-7,0.000018913619,0.5942288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98150253,0.000012329015,0.0010290327,0.0044009937,0.00004273897,0.0000014563417,9.702939e-7,0.0000019304298,0.013008045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938095,0.00021401825,0.00009673162,0.00008321433,0.00013374514,0.000091339876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871343,0.0010771384,0.000046097397,0.000052034833,0.00007208591,0.0000392049],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015969765,0.000035125035,0.00006144784,0.00005443217,0.00016588948,0.000055804026,0.00003823288,0.00008179259,0.00092852773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001963078,0.000032963442,0.0000048517977,0.00009365776,0.00015422833,0.0002257413,0.000008687486,0.00038080002,0.000005725039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011418158,0.000052820167,0.008631139,0.00003251179,0.0000031023328,1.7281384e-7,0.12884986,0.0000026294556,0.000018174605,0.8590147,0.0023935996,0.0009898455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037248863,0.00010591181,0.055819113,0.00005554096,0.000026696542,0.0000010194586,0.08299964,0.00012348602,0.00012574403,0.027375426,0.8328199,0.00017507559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08969688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19260575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8316393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002882303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032668147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113978615","doi":"10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172309","title":"Women in the Legal Profession","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Feminization (sociology); Remuneration; Inequality; Legal education; Law; Legal research; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.055934275401579865,"score_gpt":0.43478064499133956,"score_spread":0.3788463695897597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113978615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0824866,0.0020786999,0.0000015740864,0.09368866,0.00019715684,0.00030304087,0.0000037229865,0.000009355657,0.8212312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98135084,0.0052922023,0.000021281106,0.012649073,0.00006645392,0.000017846201,5.2118605e-7,9.758189e-7,0.0006008331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988819,0.00022950387,0.0001566876,0.00009209584,0.0004395092,0.0002003496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994998,0.00012121757,0.00008711956,0.000058613485,0.00019635692,0.00003691854],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004432101,0.000034091285,0.00009364151,0.000024962932,0.001371702,0.00003371252,0.00025368674,0.0000222979,0.000056141955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066359766,0.000022621272,0.000016256243,0.0008488965,0.0015015568,0.0009769585,0.000022991828,0.00013534116,0.0000047943995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7569646e-7,0.000030449864,0.00013112964,0.000050840605,4.060408e-7,5.719631e-7,0.16062222,2.049789e-9,0.0000071401005,0.8355622,0.0012372534,0.002356885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003377859,0.000012970052,0.003935544,0.00010253287,0.000001811356,0.0000014520787,0.032319143,9.044384e-8,0.000002925055,0.0011512807,0.9624002,0.000038253063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027294008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019649643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.961163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042662305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093906873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115080986","doi":"","title":"University v. Student Challenging the Contractual Understanding of Higher Education in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redaction; Political science; Higher education; Humanities; Library science; Law; Art; Computer science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.016350951305812607,"score_gpt":0.23803787043269617,"score_spread":0.22168691912688357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115080986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79513776,0.00032274256,0.000036613805,0.014390966,0.0014810461,0.00015095633,0.000004834668,0.000014482037,0.18846059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867729,0.000049497732,0.00004553032,0.00016419671,0.00008309544,0.0000010573373,0.0000033908047,0.0000026966707,0.012877619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991977,0.00010671839,0.00011758594,0.0001154355,0.00031622936,0.00014633036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993163,0.0002237148,0.00013251064,0.00012165552,0.00012359029,0.000082272876],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025754797,0.00006132722,0.00007271337,0.00009876059,0.0033512635,0.00002403166,0.0002252531,0.000055004075,0.00012818957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057928064,0.00006281978,0.000029122379,0.00033268722,0.00018886956,0.00037580662,0.00003679293,0.00031101645,0.0000022366003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030668412,0.00009313785,0.058445625,0.0000037046589,0.00002443595,0.000026251028,0.03669407,0.00015838876,0.00065079186,0.90225273,0.0009068167,0.0007133762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022966583,0.0000050608605,0.24932888,0.00001327453,0.000021374615,0.000009921104,0.34733552,0.000028217406,0.00008423845,0.0004649265,0.4023843,0.00009460926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.980363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9017878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007143857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017656446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99794626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115872543","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.1.143","title":"Sexual Consent as Voluntary Agreement: Tales of “Seduction” or Questions of Law?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntariness; Plaintiff; Plea; Law; Reasonable person; Sexual assault; Psychology; Common law; Political science; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.14573273859255423,"score_gpt":0.4411455447944021,"score_spread":0.29541280620184784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115872543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036705073,0.0308864,0.00009564278,0.2861713,0.0015296118,0.0021633478,0.000036391844,0.00008275923,0.6423295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88792276,0.029326325,0.007220678,0.024264986,0.00095998944,0.00017003214,0.00007597158,0.000025595777,0.050033648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986993,0.00022993282,0.00047105522,0.00013732148,0.00032031187,0.00014205558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985426,0.00032310735,0.00031055274,0.00021011927,0.00049387274,0.00011974107],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004514551,0.00008702456,0.00022551593,0.00003416004,0.0002385618,0.000037616705,0.00017054615,0.000045159533,0.011004902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008770202,0.000072299976,0.000056317407,0.00032056886,0.00045360852,0.0005877232,0.000021059015,0.00014182617,0.00039685916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048005704,0.00013636926,0.000030453462,0.0007782758,0.0000199291,4.318552e-7,0.002411358,2.277446e-7,0.0000918445,0.9325854,0.055713933,0.008226936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007494016,0.00008595467,0.0001550957,0.0007177659,0.00017833471,0.000009489328,0.0033621434,3.753907e-7,0.00008052486,0.002207445,0.99304175,0.000086176195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26712912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01588503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9373278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004683288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014024153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98989916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116362825","doi":"10.1177/0886368711416434","title":"Women, Private Practice and Billable Hours","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Ontario Medical Association","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Business; Law; Public relations; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.137116248515428,"score_gpt":0.36794592359630873,"score_spread":0.23082967508088073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116362825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047977876,0.10809005,0.0002151498,0.13764805,0.0013022023,0.0019314646,0.000010638906,0.00032028722,0.7025043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5022781,0.4336999,0.011806935,0.047928046,0.00035353034,0.00025736887,0.00002850357,0.00003662942,0.0036110233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874485,0.00031672415,0.00028941574,0.0001865432,0.00025272786,0.00020972948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986295,0.00027315278,0.00029014077,0.00020598937,0.00046333874,0.00013786813],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018887472,0.00008935887,0.00016146804,0.00006287904,0.0004288222,0.000113935086,0.00014517548,0.000046125893,0.002654555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030891416,0.00008423954,0.000022858028,0.0007156921,0.000095995805,0.0013062849,0.000029428085,0.00016423812,0.0003389856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008085085,0.000125281,0.0011842322,0.00018935886,0.000024487133,8.9516294e-7,0.018249648,5.705303e-7,0.0000062954837,0.83156013,0.0089997435,0.13965125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007947893,0.000019939409,0.0048014657,0.000309867,0.00003322709,0.000004837594,0.001491436,0.0000012435206,0.00000658579,0.0012509424,0.99188155,0.00011940164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007128415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009256562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98288184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009250857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003102401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99825716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116469998","doi":"10.1177/0018726707080079","title":"Hired professional to hired gun: An identity theory approach to understanding the ethical behaviour of professionals in non-professional organizations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Relations","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Corporation; Identity (music); Public relations; Professional responsibility; Process (computing); Professional ethics; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11247978806460586,"score_gpt":0.4696475342291505,"score_spread":0.35716774616454466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116469998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7280341,0.000012925937,0.097985566,0.097108625,0.002280404,0.0028414556,0.00004209402,0.0001267646,0.07156812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822428,4.2078727e-7,0.002700372,0.0021243657,0.00022049081,0.00010244734,0.000115757415,0.000019894966,0.012473418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699414,0.0008872482,0.00063718896,0.00031204626,0.0008309765,0.00033843037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976215,0.0010463793,0.00023362527,0.0003355491,0.0005300288,0.00023292191],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006473146,0.0001277751,0.00016069428,0.00047240156,0.0028075525,0.00010717643,0.0004715559,0.0003328423,0.0012408058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025101283,0.00010606668,0.000044273485,0.0032902637,0.00023600999,0.0009001091,0.000116520605,0.001104046,0.00006766901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018986848,0.00067558297,0.011251304,0.0000046547143,0.000009091471,4.1599142e-7,0.10161313,0.00008613847,0.0002959444,0.8796565,0.006356219,0.000032055894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046849018,0.000048132166,0.6131312,0.0001580282,0.0000470214,0.0000016627135,0.2625567,0.00005874163,0.00005573784,0.11956239,0.0035714263,0.0003404385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062867394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005916662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7600941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044313705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013336677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117658617","doi":"10.1002/j.2161-1920.2003.tb00857.x","title":"Gender barriers in the legal profession: Implications for career development of female law students","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Employment Counseling","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Career development; Psychology; Career counseling; Legal profession; Psychosocial; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12526450984380552,"score_gpt":0.44304729882061356,"score_spread":0.317782788976808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117658617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9698384,0.00026223972,0.0036972028,0.016086884,0.0010165146,0.0006008862,0.000003540102,0.0000060976313,0.008488279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994517,0.000033439563,0.0039754077,0.0011307229,0.00009522592,0.000033963614,0.0000011820739,0.0000054190928,0.00020760187],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849933,0.00022334416,0.0005519987,0.00007018476,0.0005007652,0.00015436114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984287,0.00033628408,0.00040494537,0.00009442387,0.00067407417,0.000061578074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044004396,0.000058072164,0.000108304564,0.00008608655,0.0005609204,0.00010986863,0.00029240898,0.000041990592,0.000059031332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060806336,0.00004280471,0.000049507693,0.00032631613,0.000052102132,0.0004184936,0.000005764869,0.00020172016,0.0000011425374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037126272,0.0004774202,0.04760379,0.000024438565,0.00010137029,0.0000011337562,0.4759367,0.000109672066,0.0005166737,0.47004256,0.004060025,0.0010890593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004966179,0.000033920933,0.006362238,0.000049014176,0.000033374312,0.0000045814936,0.15147164,9.017906e-7,0.00024423935,0.0024239079,0.83878887,0.00009071466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010777589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000671133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83472884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013642937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020612935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4314203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118268266","doi":"10.5791/0882-2875-23.4.210","title":"The Cross-Examiner's Tactics: What the Expert Witness Should Know","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Valuation Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Expert witness; Need to know; Cross-examination; Actuarial science; Business; Computer science; Law; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.19334209331481794,"score_gpt":0.484645277328926,"score_spread":0.29130318401410804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118268266","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00065008836,0.18695079,0.0019985694,0.7952825,0.0031368406,0.001216775,0.0000012065392,0.000097333796,0.010665945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0885124,0.85619247,0.00036049454,0.044261318,0.0016947917,0.0007900617,0.000045324054,0.0000330639,0.0081100855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783236,0.0005307719,0.00042445702,0.00019795587,0.000779939,0.00023452369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963501,0.00075529877,0.0003537091,0.0004651294,0.0020199777,0.000055790188],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046524364,0.00012566871,0.00014716333,0.0000327202,0.0023457683,0.0016504392,0.00048134956,0.00006802742,0.00059637055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078041577,0.00007130722,0.00006306881,0.0018594044,0.0004377316,0.002542009,0.000034150933,0.00024575685,0.00031812952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008590706,0.00017291243,0.00017067623,0.00019638111,0.00004030583,9.193278e-7,0.009523371,0.00020638146,0.000014294503,0.549858,0.037801553,0.40200663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013320148,0.000003743285,0.0035243735,0.0006179685,0.000039636237,0.0000029213843,0.0021799386,0.000008029744,0.0000064765973,0.005365099,0.9880044,0.00011419975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016980657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006996542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9502029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017089496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018010486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119918168","doi":"10.32920/22227781","title":"Barriers to the Profession: Inaction in Ontario, Canada and its Consequences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Diversity (politics); Medical profession; Limiting; Perception; White (mutation); White paper; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Medicine; Psychology; Medical education; Engineering; Chemistry","score_opus":0.054552175069815925,"score_gpt":0.37226311436153686,"score_spread":0.31771093929172095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119918168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5647619,0.0000031503284,5.3132493e-7,0.36811146,0.00061424106,0.00013123179,5.7987364e-7,0.000015587048,0.066361316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9549376,0.000006326372,0.000010747289,0.004447661,0.000031409872,0.000028380762,0.0000011478193,0.0000010874978,0.04053569],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995175,0.000097740936,0.0000716941,0.00006769346,0.00014408532,0.000101306316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999636,0.0001651432,0.000020510766,0.000038568374,0.000055868877,0.000083893734],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056576123,0.000024596322,0.000027792557,0.00004179629,0.0004924631,0.0000587758,0.00006237171,0.000020050004,0.0017645799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011024614,0.00001721149,0.0000029421506,0.00070741883,0.000031269985,0.00022662868,0.000011492563,0.00014135068,0.000028329743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010401328,0.00000694013,0.11358251,0.0000032712496,0.0000060796287,0.000005087867,0.11913121,0.000019588802,0.000106696396,0.38227358,0.38314423,0.0017103994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023688037,0.0000031352108,0.046917386,0.0000037889981,8.4953103e-7,2.889791e-7,0.12615925,0.0000062459258,0.000032836328,0.00033302326,0.82648647,0.000033043118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44334224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003697204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008481815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120412134","doi":"","title":"Report Regarding the Pacific McGeorge Workshop on Globalizing the Law School Curriculum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Comparative law; Political science; International law; Law; Legal education; Criminal law; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02943293822929155,"score_gpt":0.2829992173835312,"score_spread":0.2535662791542396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120412134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06836008,0.000075482196,0.00010674536,0.2298851,0.00088486174,0.00033604045,0.00001525293,0.00007275227,0.7002637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743415,0.000023226468,0.00015962626,0.00033489318,0.00019110752,0.000001288823,0.0000076237266,0.000008604266,0.024932142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975945,0.00094099384,0.00021239158,0.0002478528,0.0006907364,0.00031354185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745816,0.00053770095,0.00044053694,0.0010111498,0.00046835147,0.00008408724],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027936033,0.00013103182,0.00014269292,0.00008024884,0.0070805135,0.00093485287,0.0013786219,0.00012712492,0.0002755052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012588796,0.000088573324,0.0002034629,0.0018032122,0.000839748,0.002157558,0.00019940773,0.001233075,0.00014432211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001764821,0.00015586695,0.02659952,0.0000031638517,0.00004795466,0.000010239613,0.0074022496,0.000043427794,0.00006173075,0.83242315,0.13278447,0.00045056405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012767252,0.000006147475,0.012372908,0.00004207558,0.0000512711,0.000009825121,0.1543803,0.000011167954,0.000009759216,0.004853471,0.82801753,0.000117835014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02619702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016836137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9059814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002584033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038717545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99421215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122916132","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-37090-8_4","title":"“Law, Marching with Medicine but in the Rear and Limping a Little”: Ethics as “First Aid” for Law","year":2013,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Medical law; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.12196712636452926,"score_gpt":0.40122037667342303,"score_spread":0.27925325030889375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122916132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00080879155,0.0051650237,0.0012483713,0.26146784,0.0020876334,0.0056259586,0.00014602592,0.00018910534,0.72326124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45935962,0.0260796,0.029679593,0.09263145,0.015906,0.0034621847,0.0027483758,0.0014137471,0.36871943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918247,0.0012828872,0.0017747122,0.0016853708,0.0019855807,0.0014467853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98466355,0.010999172,0.0015678616,0.0013710195,0.000837612,0.00056076463],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0098117,0.0012700134,0.0013337822,0.0005732436,0.0040743463,0.0014929452,0.001589286,0.0019354133,0.0014519566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003363043,0.0009411631,0.00028226583,0.0008573042,0.003444622,0.0017428533,0.00031752937,0.006881881,0.00055749924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023262094,0.00019452097,0.00010654114,0.00040537954,0.0005178468,0.000020466978,0.07885999,0.0000022909956,0.000034135635,0.91282135,0.0034281097,0.003376744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015979591,0.0005705517,0.00009620132,0.001956673,0.001167971,0.000052537314,0.016610319,0.00009106825,0.00002081516,0.082173936,0.89450824,0.001153706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07879019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04275549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89108014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004865649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001710281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123403087","doi":"10.1017/cls.2013.61","title":"How Much “Law” in Legal Studies? Approaches to Teaching Legal Research and Doctrinal Analysis in a Legal Studies Program","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies; Legal psychology; Law; Legal education; Legal realism; Political science; Legal opinion; Practice of law; International Legal English Certificate; Legal ethics; Legal writing; Legal history; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Comparative law; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.18414222737001318,"score_gpt":0.42393102368995494,"score_spread":0.23978879631994177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123403087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8456265,0.0011216354,0.000017589178,0.1270277,0.00037455323,0.00041540898,0.000013270018,0.00000979407,0.02539359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938516,0.00021968533,0.0012558216,0.0019865767,0.00046351197,0.000045754918,0.0000046659857,0.000014361588,0.0021580474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969733,0.00083477475,0.0005587141,0.0003802481,0.00028805865,0.0009649561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969224,0.00091409136,0.00024848178,0.000187208,0.0006488594,0.0010789996],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009945002,0.00019835716,0.0006448309,0.0005463817,0.0015708688,0.0010987442,0.00032352234,0.00017666092,0.000008699722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002433453,0.00020826184,0.00017122223,0.0015939245,0.0011455718,0.0016118162,0.000044049204,0.0017786785,5.299493e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008323937,0.000044820026,0.0016691615,0.000045492736,0.00033920273,0.000049101505,0.14712116,0.000017377984,0.0000025893128,0.8466846,0.00074035197,0.003277816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005071945,0.00022325451,0.0018047764,0.00011866925,0.00011871972,0.000037348414,0.45231503,0.00008314847,0.000002167905,0.010044688,0.53447384,0.00027117386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5237399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98648095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83663994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019691265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022522416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127915910","doi":"","title":"Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Secondary Sources: Treatises & Books","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.2814704885196405,"score_gpt":0.47381190486557984,"score_spread":0.19234141634593932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127915910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000058439397,0.0011943764,0.0000024699214,0.12086872,0.002444681,0.00042535792,0.00026030678,0.00013495698,0.8746107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032265468,0.00048826684,0.0005389701,0.0074995155,0.00463479,0.00008551762,0.0005409874,0.000052799925,0.9829326],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956075,0.001043475,0.0005131935,0.00046685032,0.0014008097,0.0009681539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477696,0.0010151471,0.00019182872,0.00052650756,0.002453861,0.0010356717],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005315373,0.00024264962,0.0003107658,0.0012167153,0.0023057421,0.001936942,0.0008871777,0.00063866924,0.02862113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073261056,0.000234381,0.000095123265,0.0012370509,0.00083467894,0.0012664101,0.00006510029,0.002203378,0.0017675225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023501734,0.000019305158,0.00003464089,0.000013083885,0.00003236803,0.000012302744,0.0123487795,2.3260766e-7,2.1598007e-7,0.14240406,0.838176,0.0069566285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009251571,0.000030475076,0.00002486396,0.00004821399,0.000021579408,0.0000033773636,0.04133391,6.8275085e-7,0.000002888703,0.004399998,0.95376253,0.00027894226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9903434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98845667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13800406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015707568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091302566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129254812","doi":"10.1353/hpu.2012.0179","title":"Pilot Study of Impact of Medical-Legal Partnership Services on Patients’ Perceived Stress and Wellbeing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Family Medicine","funders":"","keywords":"Perceived Stress Scale; General partnership; Legal service; Scale (ratio); Medicine; Perception; Service (business); Family medicine; Psychology; Stress (linguistics); Political science","score_opus":0.0969771735830131,"score_gpt":0.4355614910585966,"score_spread":0.3385843174755835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129254812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858603,0.00065542565,0.000008802608,0.012577312,0.0003192816,0.00031527248,0.000009998138,0.0000023792745,0.00025122994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915165,0.00018350568,0.000020687483,0.00045627024,0.00016013264,0.000002588485,0.0000024739038,0.000005074939,0.00001759559],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985019,0.0003496201,0.00043449516,0.000052953026,0.00048576403,0.00017527079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788624,0.00081074005,0.0006716931,0.000067604255,0.00039096782,0.00017277093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001948527,0.00006527868,0.00020300929,0.000080254955,0.00044028225,0.000041776242,0.00014778873,0.000028424605,0.000036750058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035288392,0.00004044187,0.00004807306,0.00013934162,0.0000771883,0.0003677375,0.000014989021,0.00020467545,1.1221928e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007116693,0.0025825389,0.5772141,0.0005324654,0.00026900877,2.775216e-7,0.40658873,0.000023734869,0.000010563105,0.006561382,0.0010898891,0.0044156206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013141524,0.003479446,0.6019803,0.00013888723,0.000057170608,8.8649136e-7,0.39069927,0.000012853341,0.0000030932392,0.00006191252,0.0022020168,0.00004999754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019043982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008773021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024766188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007595474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000624514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98748827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130772784","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v1i0.127","title":"Why not an International Journal of Clinical Legal Education?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Milestone; Legal education; Political science; Law; Legal profession; Foundation (evidence); Phenomenon; Sociology; Public administration; History","score_opus":0.12128482251116936,"score_gpt":0.578979243557481,"score_spread":0.45769442104631164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130772784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4025376,0.00014401456,0.0050117527,0.33341444,0.1806256,0.00030301153,0.000020694226,0.00004228094,0.077900596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9087451,0.000527724,0.01302364,0.028090848,0.046393074,0.0000070487667,0.000040756542,0.000031254167,0.0031405233],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98921764,0.0022480462,0.0052017034,0.0003520664,0.002685832,0.00029473996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736487,0.002636589,0.0064352853,0.0003826161,0.016137619,0.0007591833],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015446612,0.000240909,0.00070083555,0.0008095138,0.00024921237,0.0012076864,0.0026604834,0.00038393418,0.0014135643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045845658,0.00022510835,0.00074352504,0.0004610749,0.0005123328,0.0071285404,0.00008687127,0.0021031303,0.000081501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009594737,0.0067629134,0.035054393,0.0000064015817,0.00050224055,0.000010898264,0.0023291756,0.00004337621,0.000040517618,0.31950668,0.15847278,0.47631115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011628493,0.00041475313,0.045829765,0.00012563267,0.00010262403,0.00016783802,0.0030043507,0.000056519566,0.000038751194,0.0041454746,0.9447335,0.000217926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021806215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052728294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7862607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032657554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024071563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131400723","doi":"10.1017/s1472669610000393","title":"Teaching Legal Research in Canadian Law Schools: Are We Meeting the Needs of the Profession?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Relation (database); Legal research; Legal education; Law; Process (computing); Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.059927399506550516,"score_gpt":0.4183067987122265,"score_spread":0.35837939920567596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131400723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01753947,0.0000041465682,0.000010302545,0.35924146,0.00075867824,0.00050938386,0.0000024870753,0.00001432125,0.62191975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920762,0.00000771661,0.0001982494,0.0029610922,0.00013031808,0.00006759239,0.0000041894436,0.0000034932543,0.0045511504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981766,0.00046238067,0.00035825814,0.00005398698,0.0006119272,0.00033689287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990426,0.0001464033,0.00020529973,0.0002946795,0.00022946345,0.00008159185],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066718697,0.00006104214,0.000059268375,0.0004000865,0.002015095,0.00064957066,0.00057020737,0.000066675304,0.000099263874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049856806,0.000040598406,0.000029105711,0.0013123567,0.00017307702,0.003491456,0.0001055744,0.0015698491,0.0000675651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023722769,0.000014321114,0.0013961968,0.000021222526,0.0000053502768,1.8884904e-7,0.024234284,0.000038557915,0.0000046018176,0.9597651,0.010546084,0.00397176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007039015,0.000002114313,0.0023520757,0.000053784046,0.0000029976309,2.6679245e-7,0.15876831,0.00009760446,0.000010896686,0.0014585445,0.837139,0.000043995573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8400243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83376944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9745367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021085178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074643415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131418799","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.4.214","title":"My Favourite Plagiarist: Some Reflections of an Offended Party","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Favourite; Work (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.09458274108467288,"score_gpt":0.3993961375232506,"score_spread":0.30481339643857774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131418799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53825593,0.0005850748,0.0007925862,0.12133927,0.0049742847,0.00019020063,0.000013027932,0.000052971438,0.33379665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863486,0.00007217126,0.009638756,0.0013875528,0.0008351848,0.0000018656242,0.0000029302737,0.000010910024,0.0017019884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717635,0.00082748797,0.00067612564,0.000117499345,0.00097211445,0.00023041644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951737,0.00036428965,0.0010397844,0.0001813208,0.0029651925,0.00027574762],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009596422,0.0000805095,0.00017986645,0.000497604,0.00076117704,0.012884414,0.0005085895,0.00020946801,0.00041073348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030081771,0.00007635709,0.000095704534,0.0012904882,0.00011065828,0.15178739,0.000016852593,0.0022846567,0.0000065199365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003618843,0.00061413227,0.005970955,0.00001160436,0.00010041075,0.000010104711,0.03527699,0.000038704187,0.0036681402,0.91402006,0.035376314,0.004876391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000412074,0.000087020286,0.004266528,0.000030763138,0.000037715923,0.000035168934,0.02546595,0.0000029822486,0.0005616234,0.028409675,0.9405771,0.00011340771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011029306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004818905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9052008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019450675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025733006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133066758","doi":"","title":"KF Modified and the Classification of Canadian Common Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Jurisdiction; Law library; Law; Class (philosophy); Political science; Common law; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04707655272147427,"score_gpt":0.3297913147573707,"score_spread":0.28271476203589646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133066758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07124523,0.00011806589,0.000010438518,0.19580525,0.00019099904,0.0002144813,0.000007055721,0.000023160674,0.73238534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902534,0.000052518535,0.00013047835,0.0076225493,0.00012818974,0.00000949545,0.0000087685985,0.0000030845554,0.0017915191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991722,0.00022307271,0.00017891052,0.000101165126,0.0001731193,0.00015151782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992175,0.00019636533,0.000104278166,0.00019190073,0.0001388397,0.00015112535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085974653,0.0000521113,0.00009011504,0.00007354205,0.00075490994,0.00017605776,0.00017026119,0.00006826902,0.00018717971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026210755,0.00004208793,0.000023392458,0.0005550573,0.00041160404,0.00044968253,0.000005369975,0.000222856,0.000038220645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009272209,0.000016996557,0.00014599136,0.0000011262882,0.0000039367524,1.5037679e-7,0.0028019326,0.0000021341193,0.00006740692,0.9908567,0.0051926943,0.0009016676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033995428,0.00001309954,0.013550573,0.0000074744808,0.000014185128,6.6767734e-7,0.002870173,0.000042861935,0.000056078537,0.06230033,0.92072576,0.00007883829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7834144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83160126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9285564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006315913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004270229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5806233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133230046","doi":"","title":"A Longitudinal Analysis of the U.S. News Law School Academic Reputation Scores between 1998 and 2013","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Huskie Commons (Northern Illinois University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Period (music); Longitudinal study; Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Set (abstract data type); Political science; Law; Medicine; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.04171701854984389,"score_gpt":0.2977407631250004,"score_spread":0.25602374457515653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133230046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428026,0.000068946334,0.00015209394,0.020573217,0.00008773883,0.00027440191,0.000021014015,0.000038150396,0.03598185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703336,0.00016979336,0.000083878986,0.00016089476,0.00007302415,0.000001732737,0.000019082789,0.000005710391,0.0024524995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886817,0.00029827125,0.00021359383,0.0001950488,0.0002518216,0.0001730959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866426,0.00035756436,0.00029607862,0.0002739945,0.00027822654,0.00012990262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024950074,0.000092908755,0.00018023932,0.00038904132,0.00082812086,0.000094950585,0.0003774979,0.00012472042,0.00020895663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020034777,0.00008273812,0.00010648943,0.0027779455,0.000522144,0.00092884165,0.00008818538,0.00040289515,0.0000544888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038966414,0.000027317903,0.955504,0.00000302524,0.00020135517,3.8458865e-7,0.0033263513,0.00008044631,0.000016452443,0.03876024,0.0009002044,0.0011763453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015181638,0.000012711858,0.80190134,0.0000146696375,0.0006157409,2.6124027e-7,0.006021767,0.00005130485,0.000012888994,0.0013243547,0.18976068,0.00013243465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.111092806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28400695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18886049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001191408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030990306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8948265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133411276","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2402379","title":"The Flipped Classroom: How Using Technology Outside the Classroom Can Make Law Classes More Productive and Enjoyable","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Flipped classroom; Mathematics education; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.01879878520552358,"score_gpt":0.332266235977352,"score_spread":0.3134674507718284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133411276","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124774195,0.0014463105,0.0016682688,0.8554293,0.00082835753,0.00038623848,0.0000019909382,0.000059888338,0.015405465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98900354,0.0013220846,0.0001992499,0.0008842706,0.0010352045,0.000015380017,0.0000010171284,0.000017039638,0.0075222375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972119,0.0004891978,0.00021663835,0.00021951104,0.00035706657,0.0015057268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847984,0.0004502792,0.00032406326,0.00026778548,0.00040748212,0.000070534705],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042181294,0.0001370999,0.00013511252,0.0001004019,0.004487673,0.0007295511,0.00045331114,0.00013307482,0.0000111194795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018070095,0.00008535233,0.000046639998,0.0007445423,0.00090938475,0.00036770344,0.000049095295,0.0029472848,0.000005348157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011583342,0.000022509445,0.0012265174,0.0000011234538,0.00006521241,2.636664e-7,0.0023448376,0.000006386031,0.00020887816,0.971111,0.00032490774,0.024676807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017490551,0.00006466737,0.00015664015,0.0000073623105,0.000044465713,0.00009837876,0.08047649,0.00007183909,0.000089163455,0.3647643,0.55393046,0.000121293575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026951642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098657705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8642293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007539818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056755547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133560527","doi":"10.1177/1057567706295486","title":"Indigenous-Run Legal Services in Australia and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Criminal Justice Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal service; Face (sociological concept); Politics; Demographics; Legal research; Political science; Representation (politics); Legal culture; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Social science; Ecology","score_opus":0.04578314015224745,"score_gpt":0.3999189300624869,"score_spread":0.3541357899102395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133560527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76591337,0.018875495,0.000030703875,0.08556922,0.0031089953,0.00068298477,0.00005314315,0.000047262663,0.12571885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748414,0.010625428,0.00036675992,0.006707098,0.0006799327,0.00003249081,0.000060721137,0.0000075810653,0.006678596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988575,0.000100026184,0.00030792665,0.00015132557,0.00040653994,0.00017666523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932885,0.00016087313,0.00013769406,0.000072518946,0.00024229933,0.00005773836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004921708,0.00008179154,0.000115496725,0.00007021118,0.00017259149,0.00014684854,0.0002277527,0.000034444223,0.00059885526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024175186,0.00008365933,0.000019222518,0.00021449711,0.00004989309,0.00058472337,0.000021551428,0.00020782086,0.00003174006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032391108,0.0004306506,0.018020853,0.008039017,0.000058466572,0.00018728609,0.010797039,0.00004042199,0.000056270634,0.86565036,0.07633837,0.020348893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007083927,0.000005154697,0.01313567,0.0005374374,0.0001345963,0.000015366633,0.003040641,0.000005120259,0.000003699847,0.00022980556,0.9827132,0.000108463064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9822041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.975932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9063748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027556374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010629453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6557045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134430022","doi":"","title":"Public Service Ethics in the New Millennium: The Evolving Canadian System","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Information ethics; Government (linguistics); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Service (business); Political science; Ethical code; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Public relations; Public administration; Computer science; Business; Law; Engineering; Philosophy; Marketing","score_opus":0.07299654097945171,"score_gpt":0.3518017207287447,"score_spread":0.278805179749293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134430022","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042515732,0.0021374254,0.0001521809,0.91213936,0.00035204683,0.00013694733,5.1600597e-7,0.000015085416,0.08081489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813269,0.0011889194,0.000038385766,0.013681681,0.0014553234,0.000005565821,0.0000011627064,0.0000069577286,0.0022951404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969589,0.00087110215,0.00021685798,0.00008913819,0.000432385,0.0014316342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873537,0.0005180102,0.00012829024,0.00015790106,0.00032469656,0.00013575098],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012514347,0.00006928614,0.00006031405,0.00014017151,0.0021857056,0.0006975775,0.0007307103,0.0001101013,0.00014961418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012610636,0.00004410459,0.00003399416,0.0012797762,0.000044414,0.00083307835,0.000008986232,0.005593588,0.00011580574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010659536,0.000010470379,0.0003236206,0.000001301167,0.000013094783,4.213222e-7,0.046861567,0.000012218233,0.0000011696505,0.93865377,0.009489297,0.004632006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008752456,0.000007685953,0.00047423964,0.00000925839,0.000008276081,0.00007135021,0.18909623,0.000055504537,2.5281727e-7,0.010150006,0.79998106,0.00005860207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6023804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99447024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9770753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031153646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07342345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135003238","doi":"10.1017/s1472669606000673","title":"Life at a Large US Law Firm","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Management; Law library; Business; Sociology; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; History; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.015120928978115037,"score_gpt":0.31146954078548117,"score_spread":0.29634861180736616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135003238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022233247,0.000012032484,0.002164771,0.04419237,0.0005440933,0.00029781787,0.000010044521,0.00013449734,0.95042104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91341853,0.000017261473,0.0015330202,0.03363639,0.00028567738,0.00007195636,0.00020051273,0.0000052049277,0.050831426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989432,0.00004934676,0.0003087104,0.00007061695,0.00038983038,0.00023829762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994461,0.000032110012,0.00015810199,0.00014952639,0.00012537229,0.00008879744],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000548537,0.000070760114,0.000059417096,0.00011572139,0.0009242931,0.0006002245,0.00014838147,0.000045833982,0.0018447054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087613305,0.000074301824,0.000035569505,0.00045659754,0.000055083714,0.004654407,0.000060531063,0.00011215687,0.0025196353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004183009,0.000031448144,0.0002303906,0.00000977266,0.0000074851155,4.1220414e-7,0.0013418385,0.000070796035,2.5427386e-7,0.7590947,0.23877089,0.00043782822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023270813,0.00000513537,0.003097639,0.0000036194065,0.0000101439055,2.9623436e-7,0.0020020865,0.00012850059,0.0000041230096,0.0012316464,0.9931881,0.00009599009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012885078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054836567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9111952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019945814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011043693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137754152","doi":"10.1017/s1472669606000831","title":"Legal Information Retrieval Study – Lexis Professional and Westlaw UK","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction","keywords":"Lexis; Legal research; Computer science; Political science; Information retrieval; Library science; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015525875127511649,"score_gpt":0.3348233183128624,"score_spread":0.31929744318535075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137754152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070517115,0.000009400848,0.0016538127,0.031437434,0.001549664,0.0016273598,0.00001475498,0.00019518058,0.8929953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834955,0.000011723771,0.00089618406,0.0027370732,0.00019973425,0.00006291229,0.00018650285,0.000004146567,0.01240627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812186,0.00012407104,0.00061722146,0.00009981506,0.00078114565,0.00025589732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906,0.00005998633,0.00033054934,0.00017481683,0.00029874913,0.00007590115],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012536253,0.00012862291,0.0001053224,0.00035942555,0.0010071554,0.0017106945,0.0001795572,0.000072531424,0.00047543307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013590464,0.00012711048,0.000030271789,0.0008096053,0.000096775984,0.017182043,0.000086875654,0.00026638643,0.00042942748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004647477,0.00012529374,0.0016885281,0.000028908584,0.00002333712,9.997343e-7,0.008716674,0.00007443173,7.628975e-7,0.9159626,0.06760079,0.005731253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054518634,0.000041670635,0.031252343,0.000009509325,0.000022959799,0.0000013587022,0.025696158,0.00011334305,0.0000048410056,0.0008289089,0.941329,0.00015469835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00996259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009198486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91513366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016647209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026520426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138437200","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00458.x","title":"Political Liberalism and Political Embeddedness: Understanding Politics in the Work of Chinese Criminal Defense Lawyers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Embeddedness; State (computer science); Political science; Grassroots; Power (physics); Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Social science","score_opus":0.1734326347790768,"score_gpt":0.4092485452642673,"score_spread":0.2358159104851905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138437200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03752036,0.024658045,0.00007042593,0.20186685,0.0004978692,0.0009609044,0.000020048676,0.000069227,0.73433626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95942545,0.0053588157,0.0009353673,0.033972424,0.00015456698,0.000018735656,0.0000044683807,0.000008875981,0.000121315454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983115,0.0004296695,0.0003512586,0.00015094518,0.0002935642,0.0004630488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988209,0.0006297168,0.00009588067,0.00019505057,0.000099077195,0.00015938893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013864362,0.00010935459,0.00022875643,0.0000042046368,0.00034730302,0.000066736706,0.00020658558,0.00009165759,0.00018752624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054978323,0.00007855964,0.00013222708,0.0006365281,0.0009288739,0.00031641225,0.000031002288,0.00035949127,0.0000073960637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014549569,0.00007653678,0.0022036468,0.00027245205,0.000010325834,9.606666e-7,0.026441492,4.581436e-9,2.5439036e-7,0.9693492,0.0016143507,0.000029314673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032478094,0.00004462612,0.005176522,0.0011558959,0.00025612573,0.000021662898,0.13570069,0.000002537259,0.0000024776334,0.7000487,0.1569167,0.00034927705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030120532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027018588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92190504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015395372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032281908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45533437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140356844","doi":"10.26522/tl.v3i2.45","title":"Ethically Speaking: Teachers and the Politics of Eduational Reform","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Accountability; Politics; Statement (logic); Pedagogy; Process (computing); Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Law","score_opus":0.02956453230033115,"score_gpt":0.3628469168837921,"score_spread":0.333282384583461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140356844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52387315,0.00010976668,0.00029127812,0.08844124,0.000064007916,0.000050756917,2.9407536e-7,0.000030935244,0.3871386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885287,0.000008410471,0.0011736756,0.00039832387,0.00023103777,0.0000015797601,0.0000029004404,0.0000030666379,0.0096523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887156,0.0006979331,0.00012103364,0.00006354425,0.00015552335,0.000090427915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988944,0.0008940674,0.00010019665,0.00003731106,0.000051787425,0.000022239958],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041536787,0.000034367396,0.00005592779,0.000034717657,0.00158493,0.00010145608,0.000044907913,0.000043269487,0.000030258348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028810247,0.000024759865,0.000012816604,0.000070888374,0.00032774557,0.00016155375,0.000012968475,0.0010370675,0.000001444388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025114987,0.0000099491335,0.0041552205,0.000002228053,0.000003822893,4.883713e-8,0.077944025,0.0000190525,0.000018271774,0.91099566,0.00017459576,0.0066746306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041074288,0.000014668195,0.029780176,0.000021471207,0.000020559943,0.0000031392838,0.06934327,0.00029278125,0.000002893633,0.018941201,0.88108385,0.00008522661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04066773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042152553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89205444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032068154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013784293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140820446","doi":"10.1002/job.554","title":"The professionalism of practising law: A comparison across work contexts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Collegiality; Autonomy; Public relations; Work (physics); Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Practice of law; Service (business); Law; Professional services; Legal service; Business; Psychology; Legal profession; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.10840160178633404,"score_gpt":0.4694838370837461,"score_spread":0.361082235297412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140820446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96392983,0.00038482595,0.00018472422,0.031076685,0.001743769,0.00018552382,0.0000075453954,0.00001172581,0.0024753946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967744,0.000050098144,0.0008381772,0.0003193135,0.00029242446,0.0000027389146,0.0000040737114,0.000009054487,0.0017097555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830246,0.00021711923,0.00057445257,0.00005842412,0.0007128206,0.00013470883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995696,0.0007502949,0.0010414395,0.00008258903,0.0023687638,0.000060903025],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010467543,0.000058593647,0.00013145924,0.000038011178,0.0016488525,0.00009130531,0.00024048689,0.0000672497,0.0003685011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019276264,0.00004280792,0.000046596124,0.0007731529,0.00037145286,0.00073163415,0.000022865563,0.00036240218,0.000013486755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012182097,0.0013401028,0.57217175,0.000006048692,0.00006845436,0.000018083201,0.08819843,0.00002492829,0.002342618,0.29905266,0.033974316,0.0026807662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005851436,0.000056944788,0.4461887,0.00006562597,0.0000662495,0.00012476221,0.017177505,8.6170314e-7,0.0017180059,0.0008682423,0.53299904,0.00014896317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017507271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011092828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4990247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009237678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014576182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142592619","doi":"10.1177/0264550509346536","title":"Reforming justice for women: A century of struggle","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Probation Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Orthodoxy; Ideology; Economic Justice; Human rights; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042276897188564755,"score_gpt":0.39962437746445845,"score_spread":0.3573474802758937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142592619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3484875,0.0004303208,0.028782045,0.2926598,0.0050073694,0.0012413717,0.000017168968,0.00011234994,0.32326207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99182445,0.00008893667,0.0049616,0.0007122105,0.00058038684,0.000008493821,0.0000024474953,0.0000025292813,0.0018189433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935526,0.000056711495,0.00021792129,0.000046839006,0.00018489485,0.00013834958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990231,0.00008522276,0.000277561,0.00004191154,0.0005031183,0.00006912526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011218151,0.00003178056,0.000052771495,0.00008452525,0.0005170013,0.00009452107,0.00008595265,0.00003171654,0.00026304834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013483779,0.000029360743,0.000024587289,0.00027515308,0.000024894254,0.0008032275,0.000002187059,0.00015553947,0.000004060442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008188191,0.00026245657,0.00021684924,0.000034977704,0.000020579115,3.6294873e-7,0.15943104,0.000064840926,0.0015129658,0.56353766,0.010627432,0.26420897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032046318,0.00012380238,0.0008867491,0.000019067891,0.000018202316,0.0000063491557,0.049152974,0.000051208848,0.00018564651,0.051611435,0.89754957,0.000074531614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013755385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011723678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8869221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014796619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069140573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39764085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144986047","doi":"10.1017/s1472669612000424","title":"Free Access to Law in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free access; Legislature; Access to information; Political science; Law; Information access; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03787595615320113,"score_gpt":0.35376460213865296,"score_spread":0.31588864598545185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144986047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039006795,0.0000039967717,0.0006592311,0.08401556,0.000999903,0.00034194678,0.000006708854,0.000024344865,0.91004765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616849,0.0000051431152,0.0007099933,0.035917338,0.000097445525,0.00006388801,0.000015278276,0.0000020702673,0.0015039587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991107,0.000040303366,0.00022788145,0.000038979935,0.00033754695,0.00024458105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995701,0.00003192925,0.000068757414,0.00015368193,0.0000647643,0.00011080699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051461265,0.00004782795,0.00004525435,0.00013223808,0.00020214416,0.0004886662,0.00031655867,0.000016803164,0.00058365084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010807643,0.00005163666,0.000008961296,0.0006919568,0.000013627121,0.011365715,0.00009088996,0.00010354053,0.00019637373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002423533,0.000012122941,0.0021492708,0.000007274404,0.000003725996,1.9042876e-7,0.004729371,0.00010800606,6.0456664e-8,0.8212682,0.16612968,0.0055896463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008711482,0.0000014464802,0.023403274,0.000004365196,0.0000023857597,9.4573984e-8,0.007443185,0.000010504474,0.0000050699587,0.00030805694,0.968666,0.0000684891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9830301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9841464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9577842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071155344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044268143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82398695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145175947","doi":"10.1017/s1472669611000107","title":"Vendor Liaison: the Canadian Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vendor; Perspective (graphical); Association (psychology); Library science; Business; Computer science; Law; Political science; World Wide Web; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05552094119507241,"score_gpt":0.33583372651720866,"score_spread":0.28031278532213627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145175947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001357547,0.000008491956,0.00035496583,0.0743075,0.0005704375,0.0003070014,0.0000028910083,0.000044319557,0.9242686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795749,0.000017165712,0.0009620373,0.010808837,0.00010999813,0.000062083345,0.000009598808,0.0000026211717,0.008452751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993087,0.000059177793,0.0001520822,0.000051413714,0.00024174643,0.00018689188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994054,0.000020183516,0.000090940026,0.000147443,0.00024694455,0.00008913314],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005889536,0.000050894178,0.000034102322,0.00016026892,0.0012380593,0.00051564514,0.00023515281,0.000032075324,0.0018268141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012606962,0.00004141116,0.00002500796,0.00051287364,0.000093883194,0.0032323254,0.000019381205,0.00016979336,0.0014609597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002456338,0.000008022537,0.000056425815,0.0000015547514,0.000013655277,5.672113e-7,0.067225866,0.0000023445787,1.4976749e-8,0.89034563,0.038396455,0.003947026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006116056,0.0000057986867,0.004477492,0.0000019824943,0.000009184601,4.2157737e-7,0.07607717,0.000015047333,0.0000019954134,0.004973731,0.9143214,0.00005458194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77208745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.551289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97943914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042565583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004847609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145678550","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12007","title":"The Legal Profession as a Social Process: A Theory on Lawyers and Globalization","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Globalization; Elite; Political science; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Sociology of law; Law; Process (computing); Collective action; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.04552034977072624,"score_gpt":0.4281744177441265,"score_spread":0.3826540679734003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145678550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2048291,0.00006774222,0.00003432281,0.20219204,0.0017481028,0.00059255195,0.0000031478849,0.00016612747,0.59036684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98450303,0.000028623592,0.000013940201,0.0075278063,0.001717695,0.00013937161,0.000008611592,0.00001181107,0.0060491166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983699,0.00058962073,0.00019077295,0.00017535634,0.00039958977,0.00027480125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990688,0.00031773435,0.0001679536,0.00007226595,0.00031081063,0.00006242194],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009491912,0.000099212535,0.000092240436,0.000016810509,0.0055560498,0.00070610404,0.00017813566,0.00016339749,0.0002762674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005733239,0.00007627357,0.00003739882,0.0004403827,0.0010719175,0.0010525004,0.000027900185,0.00029541808,0.00016936773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002375033,0.000051123876,0.000046652254,0.0000047623353,0.000011035551,2.129891e-7,0.08934282,1.2519106e-7,0.000018116316,0.88598305,0.016320648,0.008197702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018676442,0.000028254912,0.0013443468,0.0000107306005,0.000016182606,4.77493e-7,0.15812212,0.0000035202338,0.000019667237,0.17667344,0.6634537,0.00014082176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033461454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013021706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77967393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107677966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051873433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99573857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146423270","doi":"10.1017/s1472669600001249","title":"the JSI in Canada: Part 2","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Bursary; Law library; Law; Joint (building); Political science; Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Management; Engineering; Philosophy; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.026717935413618495,"score_gpt":0.27971349079249325,"score_spread":0.25299555537887475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146423270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063806475,0.000021016098,0.00010640245,0.13359168,0.0007912052,0.00020931716,0.0000015788896,0.000018851419,0.8646219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94104177,0.00037714522,0.00017261645,0.010705511,0.00011352057,0.000087895474,0.000009901366,0.0000025451432,0.047489073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991836,0.00005448859,0.00024140399,0.0000371813,0.0003128165,0.00017050718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996292,0.00007307663,0.00008945284,0.00011230451,0.000060755607,0.00003520451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048493827,0.000038984002,0.000032168402,0.00005840288,0.0005180579,0.00039596192,0.00016247664,0.0000135771015,0.00090727495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000120584395,0.000032251544,0.000010316752,0.0004898875,0.000029761306,0.002962044,0.00001902842,0.00012598322,0.0003452818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011170115,0.0000065174117,0.00020856797,0.0000032484004,0.000004542371,5.2831194e-7,0.002753909,0.00007371097,9.0060395e-9,0.6447645,0.29583368,0.056349687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000799788,0.0000014440781,0.0020997422,0.0000027825529,0.0000016335574,1.2586463e-7,0.0128733525,0.00037162864,3.723417e-7,0.00024620767,0.98427874,0.00004396654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85739815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9551079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9404037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048889924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002724372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146464763","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Arthurs Report Twenty Years Later","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal education; Diversification (marketing strategy); Legal profession; Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Curriculum; Law; International Legal English Certificate; Political science; Jurisprudence; Hierarchy; Sociology; Comparative law; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.02152485885083002,"score_gpt":0.3466000919766249,"score_spread":0.3250752331257949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146464763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30516377,0.0015783849,0.0021560923,0.2645715,0.002348779,0.0002706132,6.507865e-7,0.00007379985,0.42383644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97792405,0.00082915253,0.00007477591,0.0006556796,0.00082081987,0.0000028272418,9.338993e-7,0.000006875031,0.01968491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815565,0.00035123894,0.00021245994,0.00008843535,0.00027666567,0.0009155512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993641,0.00011680479,0.00021349963,0.000119397555,0.00013792847,0.00004828407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075080255,0.000049452756,0.000055762233,0.00004224131,0.0008971619,0.00024586605,0.00015240368,0.000038698116,0.00040030046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016404267,0.00003746562,0.000052111543,0.0003616745,0.0000768828,0.00040513303,0.000005681722,0.0017428033,0.00008738887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018103734,0.0000101045125,0.004387236,3.573786e-7,0.000027533615,0.0000056461613,0.0027175166,0.0000035362332,0.000009705588,0.9781537,0.0009102022,0.013772651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006863375,0.0000072995126,0.0013869304,0.000004047291,0.000012655429,0.00037804508,0.01502913,6.541449e-7,0.0000067765213,0.12519065,0.8578565,0.000058663514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003131891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000751144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8569463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039175295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062109386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146659683","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2014.00682.x","title":"Socio‐legal Scholarship in Canada: A Review of the Field","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Aotearoa; Scholarship; Field (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Regional science","score_opus":0.07271623548133417,"score_gpt":0.435153495430251,"score_spread":0.36243725994891685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146659683","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006370958,0.9578532,0.0000012910928,0.02436663,0.0005266572,0.00013288425,0.0000033404185,7.860974e-7,0.017108852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00021373369,0.9850101,0.00006875188,0.014102209,0.0002646863,0.0000021898888,5.4928535e-7,0.0000044001467,0.00033338132],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982356,0.0005461196,0.00066166266,0.00006024135,0.00038714864,0.00010927268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747366,0.0010067916,0.0011011638,0.00010296729,0.0002582302,0.000057172296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029765791,0.00008209757,0.000608841,0.000013139287,0.00020815435,0.00004769009,0.00029382118,0.00012478005,0.00009631737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015276795,0.000050957526,0.00036914906,0.0003034934,0.00009557871,0.00025153812,0.000024153176,0.0011198865,4.6303617e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017563532,0.00007426827,0.0002031147,0.051362257,0.00024141867,0.000003207512,0.0050922153,7.9185035e-8,6.425189e-8,0.35954383,0.21772188,0.36575592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037939313,0.0000060117854,0.000019884015,0.021421691,0.00013364345,0.000006840094,0.0004161083,3.511694e-8,5.0324918e-8,0.00017342018,0.97773236,0.00005199356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4204548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39899364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7600105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034744057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014592996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147312211","doi":"10.1093/ejil/cht040","title":"On the Annual Junior Faculty Forum for International Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Library science; Sociology; International law; Law; Political science; Media studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.04868430517455615,"score_gpt":0.36773562739823507,"score_spread":0.31905132222367893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147312211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030005546,0.000008380363,0.00083425746,0.3436709,0.0041339723,0.00014342081,0.000062792526,0.000012638261,0.64813304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95871866,0.000012314625,0.0014523936,0.018982744,0.001932238,0.000008218385,0.000023085408,0.000015210568,0.018855143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984886,0.0002753194,0.00041955707,0.00009528009,0.0005732741,0.00014795271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961016,0.0005844084,0.00047045504,0.00009177979,0.0026667381,0.0000850221],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015959843,0.00008267565,0.00007650728,0.000080188845,0.00045542393,0.0005726874,0.0008487871,0.000020963382,0.0025415435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019908273,0.0000575382,0.00012059352,0.00010271699,0.0002004201,0.0015213311,0.000040239396,0.000321373,0.00037793416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022174749,0.00006903306,0.000029941579,4.3013708e-7,0.000055062595,0.0000018412924,0.0016481515,0.000013501824,0.000026968282,0.77672297,0.22023177,0.0011781421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031075426,0.000058257105,0.00044106075,0.000021608224,0.0000068062923,0.000008156228,0.0048605097,0.000018027973,0.000048537273,0.015865387,0.97829175,0.00006911874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003251696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023391155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9557181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013649576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148495171","doi":"10.1177/026975800601300302","title":"Injured in the Line of Duty: Is the Practice of Law Becoming a High Risk Occupation?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Victimology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Duty; Legal profession; Law; Qualitative research; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Public relations; Social science","score_opus":0.029947132117812712,"score_gpt":0.44117625116895315,"score_spread":0.41122911905114046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148495171","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061016444,0.005271349,0.00045845588,0.6689254,0.001241121,0.0008737373,0.00010807368,0.000011628279,0.26209378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98554176,0.004163069,0.0011203841,0.008844483,0.00014048273,0.000027503012,0.000018312427,0.0000031511036,0.00014083572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804294,0.00078525045,0.0006274017,0.00009239618,0.00037497762,0.00007704534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949296,0.0029521314,0.0010591045,0.00017897623,0.00087170454,0.000008455716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030254594,0.000054117034,0.00016065936,0.00007162964,0.00009030456,0.0000134404845,0.0004328583,0.000040115854,0.0005649242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059780646,0.000035741738,0.00006460841,0.0004527193,0.00025996065,0.00030148937,0.00002671225,0.00022214498,0.000008849663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027196265,0.00030947148,0.0049222196,0.00008343063,0.00004352303,5.190206e-7,0.0054946966,0.000009370834,0.00002251783,0.97910404,0.0068802517,0.0031027622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002213794,0.0000492381,0.020526899,0.0003298439,0.00008314057,0.0000061330907,0.0019359594,0.000017898908,0.00015987466,0.019639116,0.95697314,0.000057353744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06260403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034877085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9594649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003953964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026574844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94363815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151541092","doi":"10.1017/s0075426913001201","title":"J. Miller Ed. Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: a Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011). Pp. 300. £58. 9780521514484.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Hellenic Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Content (measure theory); Theology; Classics; History; Philosophy; Media studies; Sociology; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.08726917920065426,"score_gpt":0.4039605062359768,"score_spread":0.31669132703532255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151541092","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036766216,0.05465869,0.00031383362,0.69952935,0.0040952475,0.00052668166,0.000016637574,0.00007178033,0.20402154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8041928,0.10269531,0.0011186674,0.0046839146,0.0018505664,0.0000050525396,0.0000014267603,0.000029704966,0.08542255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699676,0.0013133005,0.0005191507,0.00013428976,0.00067873695,0.0003577347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922064,0.0047937515,0.00042545795,0.000268136,0.0021452096,0.00016102447],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038621917,0.00015330751,0.00029941765,0.00007997,0.0017459757,0.0001092418,0.0006145678,0.00012657416,0.00046191787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066714888,0.000109219356,0.00013912674,0.00023755769,0.001054051,0.0009116708,0.00015056402,0.0013826323,0.0003003608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039091312,0.000115602015,0.00015579497,0.00001589506,0.00021490653,0.000005528069,0.01342273,0.0000031360069,0.000062076506,0.041547872,0.9439837,0.00043370627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028541996,0.00007423294,0.0016822141,0.00004934725,0.00019747789,0.00002834306,0.09378475,0.000009632127,0.000041523654,0.00029463327,0.90341014,0.00014227355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009809003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022780657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7674266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027644448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010822633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153773064","doi":"10.7202/043380ar","title":"Sciences et droit : relation et rapports de force","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.029862100516336785,"score_gpt":0.3484811228485304,"score_spread":0.3186190223321936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153773064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2680598,0.0009287671,0.019108735,0.29637837,0.00096880377,0.00023060443,0.0000117741265,0.00009801733,0.41421515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77085894,0.0005768967,0.011677754,0.018384121,0.0005312615,0.00002226567,0.000019698331,0.000017275812,0.19791177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977367,0.0005866073,0.0003509104,0.00031867996,0.00044042253,0.0005666901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984656,0.00071181136,0.00029956107,0.00018151563,0.00012931417,0.00021218818],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004845603,0.00014915624,0.0001452964,0.00017550668,0.0011152782,0.0004110128,0.00029755372,0.00040001402,0.0015081906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001284931,0.00018743821,0.00009582705,0.0013789767,0.001311112,0.002361181,0.000020767098,0.0010343345,0.00028800662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006101373,0.000103547245,0.0018112905,0.00001099908,0.00001757034,0.0000032605396,0.052781943,0.0008629692,0.000074003125,0.89789927,0.013709174,0.032719873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001846315,0.00004656931,0.006587536,0.000047053156,0.000050042087,0.00003067551,0.009984851,0.0014479294,0.0000987251,0.16332012,0.81794447,0.00025741284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003465157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027354253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8042353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015503756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025221468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155744514","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2015.2.8","title":"Incorporating a Creative Component in First-Year Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Creativity; Rubric; Originality; Law and literature; Psychology; Legal writing; The arts; Casebook; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Legal research; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.11533340429135934,"score_gpt":0.3847861013340781,"score_spread":0.26945269704271874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155744514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76730055,0.00060345867,0.00026276914,0.16442123,0.00074319023,0.0003297456,0.000003258078,0.000014309044,0.06632147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743545,0.000003989465,0.0008497913,0.00040026475,0.00019479019,0.000004297584,0.000001148403,0.0000058229466,0.0011044266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811625,0.0013277943,0.00016552652,0.00005672871,0.0001605932,0.0001731192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812293,0.0012490312,0.00019420963,0.00006263825,0.00017085733,0.000200338],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016828602,0.000048706184,0.00007309142,0.00008514851,0.0064482912,0.00054688216,0.00021659162,0.000040634168,0.000020475352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011521861,0.00003213336,0.00002698043,0.0001511967,0.00023855073,0.00047430806,0.000008959831,0.0024057867,0.000002231165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026637577,0.000011076107,0.035674863,0.0000049545292,0.000027860513,0.0000017524039,0.22937499,0.0021512797,0.0000065409104,0.7271809,0.0006794572,0.004859663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005006352,0.00007978836,0.010261181,0.00013995421,0.00003139589,0.000023445362,0.23689513,0.0003659712,0.0000034515936,0.043879777,0.7076939,0.00012537595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33503148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4858848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70701444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017426319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010872867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156836974","doi":"10.1017/s1472669605000630","title":"AALL 2004 – a Boston Beano","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Exhibition; Quarter (Canadian coin); Nephew and niece; Sitting; Lift (data mining); History; Media studies; Art; Political science; Art history; Sociology; Medicine; Advertising; Law; Archaeology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.01737800081076983,"score_gpt":0.3336951625272107,"score_spread":0.31631716171644086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156836974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006140092,0.000014791051,0.005146183,0.11620745,0.00044510802,0.0002983067,0.000002796458,0.00013442215,0.87713695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86577654,0.00010215876,0.013500745,0.03301152,0.0007566956,0.00009999059,0.00010481,0.00000796785,0.0866396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903554,0.000043869626,0.00028044826,0.000066335335,0.00037283823,0.00020094881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994749,0.00002537482,0.00013701098,0.0001508081,0.0001401848,0.00007171163],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059682113,0.00006753369,0.00005235669,0.00019161255,0.00046375892,0.0006182073,0.00018000655,0.000041569187,0.0017330538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008580434,0.000071688926,0.00003134615,0.00049205084,0.00004678842,0.0078929365,0.000030437322,0.0001441418,0.003549305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004177092,0.000029552011,0.00003354775,0.000007634944,0.00001145578,2.1124488e-7,0.0064105107,0.00019674857,4.4051149e-7,0.6942313,0.23447788,0.0645966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001647847,0.0000067972874,0.00044679767,0.0000050098706,0.000009527234,2.3306352e-7,0.0056506814,0.00014087392,0.000009850635,0.00039911622,0.9930736,0.000092773225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001504981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075066095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8651625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021236805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013757167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158042753","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2926","title":"The lawyer as fiduciary: Defining private law duties in public law relations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Law; Obligation; Discretion; Normative; Political science; Private law; Trust law; Sociology; Law and economics; Public law","score_opus":0.05001110103854751,"score_gpt":0.31067836116635655,"score_spread":0.26066726012780905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158042753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067711934,0.00030968618,0.000029278206,0.051601898,0.0004480411,0.000059313395,0.0000025372908,0.000016710193,0.9407613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938329,0.00013207333,0.0008570338,0.0005117746,0.00008950124,1.2859668e-7,0.0000026052394,0.000003539839,0.004570448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989331,0.00032680787,0.00014936012,0.000075844226,0.0003213283,0.00019361047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883944,0.0002598403,0.00020280102,0.00011262389,0.00044032314,0.0001449647],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015245241,0.000052633106,0.000079379475,0.00002076846,0.0026588538,0.00025079798,0.00032469304,0.00006765622,0.0010239705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004105295,0.00005027171,0.00003915752,0.00013201371,0.00053130306,0.0027920967,0.00004563939,0.00034173325,0.000056520083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015166013,0.000037285165,0.00071419793,4.5828972e-7,0.000014980505,0.0000030193278,0.023112256,0.000009929321,0.0000012451623,0.97018945,0.005637001,0.00026501375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025592436,0.000020253427,0.00044641196,0.000009296845,0.000009711987,0.0000048157517,0.06608922,0.000005390282,0.0000018573604,0.029389458,0.9037109,0.000056757697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4380256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8514165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005433547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008293528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158286611","doi":"","title":"Buyers' Remorse? An Empirical Assessment of the Desirability of a Legal Career","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Remorse; Optimism; Debt; Legal education; Psychology; Ambivalence; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.050693459449060854,"score_gpt":0.41254423371531906,"score_spread":0.3618507742662582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158286611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9414995,0.000060604656,0.00073626393,0.0406393,0.0003149297,0.00018885643,0.0000010465383,0.000007804431,0.016551694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979263,0.00006074913,0.0003697195,0.00021645329,0.00016234627,0.0000044430312,5.9646175e-7,0.0000046428263,0.0012547286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978766,0.0005852271,0.00031197432,0.00009260871,0.00045006786,0.00068353565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987043,0.00013941631,0.00030138294,0.00019421491,0.0005896946,0.000070947994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037645828,0.000057971618,0.00010776736,0.000050554103,0.00037185158,0.00007595085,0.00036125275,0.00005944658,0.00039606882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072493876,0.000040398347,0.00008176295,0.00045187253,0.00021798446,0.0007566865,0.000019550862,0.0014535616,0.000004051849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007871744,0.00034974876,0.21185705,0.000004394883,0.000057959933,8.483805e-8,0.00672236,0.000014649435,0.00064106984,0.7730254,0.0008836098,0.00643581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054176815,0.00038845013,0.52369267,0.00002009039,0.000084424064,0.0000450313,0.10073567,0.00019563037,0.00025977194,0.31628853,0.057516295,0.00023163282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0107122185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010627317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45673683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070669345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018637305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99587554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158543786","doi":"10.1061/(asce)1943-4162(2009)1:2(67)","title":"Teaching Law on Engineering and Construction Programs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Patience; Publication; Dispute resolution; Revelation; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.009108507558005574,"score_gpt":0.2661414183617926,"score_spread":0.25703291080378704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158543786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611442,0.00093181257,0.0068682833,0.017108826,0.0016520557,0.00022703827,0.0000023052974,0.00009173936,0.011973758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99013156,0.00025470142,0.009225411,0.00004366853,0.000309607,0.0000017410449,0.0000010168061,0.000004650614,0.000027617776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992327,0.000046128636,0.00028724034,0.00011022943,0.00017061921,0.00015306851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995649,0.000070567934,0.00014303152,0.000041529904,0.00007192109,0.00010808799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005546239,0.000094526236,0.0001353084,0.0002262654,0.00023336944,0.0002213507,0.00003343,0.00008222129,0.0000024668525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016071074,0.00009300296,0.000025516867,0.00019322013,0.00010269832,0.00088858226,0.000006595753,0.00047301117,2.0373864e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029010926,0.000035421966,0.0005071169,0.000020252395,0.000010966841,0.000003682384,0.0013699011,0.00074749603,0.00029849925,0.91690546,0.000018837252,0.08005337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050348756,0.0019174016,0.034845505,0.0022272824,0.00021706597,0.0039449134,0.05351146,0.058399204,0.0002649518,0.01464823,0.8233843,0.0016048427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041082915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004361499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9022572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007266404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006370839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37925503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159932472","doi":"10.1017/s0021855306000052","title":"DISCRETION, <i>NOLLE PROSEQUI</i> AND THE 1992 GHANAIAN CONSTITUTION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Accountability; Constitution; Law; Commonwealth; Political science; Subject (documents); Judicial discretion; Power (physics); Judicial review; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012635526996633837,"score_gpt":0.2999441574947578,"score_spread":0.28730863049812394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159932472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007386942,0.00024372987,0.00090275647,0.25156927,0.0004648037,0.00014085905,0.0000031631093,0.000010534037,0.73927796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968453,0.00003181804,0.00037469954,0.0009256763,0.00043824266,0.0000021331396,6.274713e-7,0.0000018086744,0.0013796726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992243,0.00017253136,0.00023256121,0.000042621916,0.00023732959,0.00009066037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992029,0.00018924914,0.00030584386,0.000052419924,0.00020684785,0.000042751133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012065133,0.00003775589,0.00008263388,0.000038495433,0.00063083955,0.00022648704,0.00009442902,0.000027177088,0.00008609009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021862757,0.00002376928,0.00003539914,0.00029439115,0.0010533872,0.0005948075,0.000005949963,0.00017865664,0.000004271894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025566895,0.000028888808,0.00017437825,0.0000010577332,0.000006777974,0.000001021944,0.0026672021,0.000004842757,0.000025722002,0.98742664,0.009310373,0.00032753084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040870125,0.000018522209,0.00024493926,0.0000080256,0.000022629494,0.000016853299,0.0053813634,0.000004958585,0.000031264488,0.025613323,0.96821076,0.000038660175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078080073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033468984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050699175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040764784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21605983","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001498","title":"Student Participation in Legal Education in Germany and Europe","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bologna Process; Curriculum; Political science; Parliament; German; Competence (human resources); Legal education; Higher education; Public relations; Pedagogy; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02568255837110394,"score_gpt":0.4457869831115504,"score_spread":0.42010442474044646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21605983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80502206,0.00010240412,0.000009790303,0.033467606,0.00036364773,0.00008555683,2.0244387e-7,0.000008354005,0.16094035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602354,0.00011949011,0.000115745715,0.0024938078,0.00032028434,0.0000034342177,0.0000012661337,0.000002787417,0.0009196427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906063,0.00024155452,0.00025319628,0.00008161575,0.00019655745,0.00016641822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959403,0.000042883745,0.000106956075,0.000054190863,0.00011843088,0.00008352974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009497981,0.000047772566,0.000063029285,0.00013451918,0.0003202782,0.00034430833,0.00008262603,0.0000340163,0.00015720369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012925721,0.000048893224,0.000010536872,0.00038346183,0.000048360376,0.0012368577,0.000006427388,0.0003855029,0.000031633943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012003921,0.00057161937,0.015505298,0.0000017646779,0.0000026227042,0.000010841185,0.030997938,0.000013210879,0.00014796876,0.9150938,0.0023000613,0.035342917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017790202,0.000021053187,0.59442586,0.000016736807,0.0000034615139,0.000012584925,0.0021515682,0.000008032124,0.000006422974,0.003680411,0.3994317,0.00006429069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002575057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010679496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9114134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107308864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063539785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59594095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161933683","doi":"","title":"What Lies Before, Behind and Beneath a Case? Five Minutes on Transnational Lawyering and the Consequences for Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Context (archaeology); Curriculum; Politics; Political science; Plaintiff; Law; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Sociology; Legal profession; Law and economics; History","score_opus":0.02423894359986444,"score_gpt":0.31572912463788577,"score_spread":0.2914901810380213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161933683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027347876,0.007114483,0.000023623244,0.4057008,0.004797613,0.0042323596,0.00032506956,0.000118466545,0.5503397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1308427,0.00084037887,0.0011472849,0.0060173115,0.0018360165,0.0008190725,0.0002471001,0.00003744179,0.8582127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986159,0.00015876102,0.00031550377,0.00034776374,0.00033809847,0.00022392541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974175,0.0015489407,0.00027210457,0.00017079021,0.00044569143,0.00014494084],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008206329,0.00021831672,0.00024491135,0.00010492154,0.0015785943,0.0022076329,0.00017946337,0.00024352194,0.00033190727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005013014,0.00017286443,0.0000723536,0.00008404418,0.001431264,0.002235286,0.000021537337,0.0004862327,0.000015107483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002530572,0.000029222761,0.0000087821245,0.000038237995,0.00004840004,0.0000022329095,0.011539118,0.0000012507825,0.0000014158165,0.9635639,0.02077833,0.0039637783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033445758,0.000051824634,0.000030713592,0.00010916842,0.00008197927,0.000059613038,0.010381249,0.000010086663,0.00000855944,0.12544553,0.8632938,0.00019302013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009532254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049502913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84251547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015543963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029370282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162727364","doi":"10.3138/cjls.26.3.613","title":"Accessing Democracy: The Critical Relationship between Academics and the Access to Information Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Government (linguistics); Parliament; Freedom of information; Legislation; Political science; Democracy; Public administration; Globe; Politics; Access to information; Information access; Public relations; Business; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.10328233018555673,"score_gpt":0.3777199630890826,"score_spread":0.2744376329035259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162727364","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44739175,0.00025793925,0.0011776274,0.47459084,0.0009707961,0.00040392866,0.0000408335,0.000012120923,0.075154155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765944,0.000065040804,0.0004495915,0.022353668,0.00036891826,0.0000057175307,0.0000033697959,0.0000072324933,0.0001520514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987821,0.00027373713,0.0003988515,0.00008497093,0.000113831775,0.00034650892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636066,0.0020612734,0.00026374144,0.00011634362,0.0004461187,0.000751872],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034498484,0.0000904987,0.0001669208,0.00006287586,0.0026871995,0.000834889,0.00042764656,0.00016138065,0.00006746886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004320473,0.00006881191,0.00008735863,0.00038846693,0.00095474796,0.003091883,0.00002591167,0.0009428087,0.0000021440126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003753909,0.0000014254379,0.011029454,0.00000880006,0.00002077545,8.267682e-7,0.21901274,7.4045664e-7,1.0122734e-7,0.7658917,0.0021595745,0.0018701552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005573025,0.000032765493,0.15259781,0.00009064741,0.00019493727,0.000055685658,0.11422576,0.000025220163,0.0000024570752,0.2584274,0.47353712,0.00025285783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12845944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30823433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52920264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031194833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022343544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163233513","doi":"","title":"Lawyers of Colour and Racialized Immigrants with Foreign Legal Degrees: An Examination of the Institutionalized Processes of Social Nullification","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of criminology and sociological theory","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Diversity (politics); Deconstruction (building); Politics; Multiculturalism; Immigration; Law; Nullification; Sociology; Contingency; Law and economics; Political science; Action (physics); Public relations; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09011427134451895,"score_gpt":0.3887672001878797,"score_spread":0.29865292884336075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163233513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882451,0.00015735016,0.0006834316,0.0052059465,0.00012021887,0.000097479904,0.000008287985,0.000003905889,0.0054782233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891365,0.00017426768,0.00048356561,0.00026204748,0.00009408203,0.0000022001213,0.0000041491858,0.0000016470165,0.00006439853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849105,0.0006749928,0.00039605453,0.00007842497,0.00028611947,0.00007336236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714106,0.0005806841,0.0008387824,0.00004009926,0.0013722279,0.000027147506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014912435,0.00006188475,0.00019064771,0.000097248674,0.00018718123,0.0000168668,0.00023906144,0.0001412875,0.00005870929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019799431,0.000039640454,0.00004271774,0.00009078405,0.0015794402,0.00044691825,0.0000129979535,0.00019737662,1.362588e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058757485,0.00021812526,0.0017217388,0.000008934937,0.00006480175,8.796363e-7,0.015420687,0.000005771849,0.0009243538,0.97300255,0.000013141723,0.008031412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018306639,0.0007357554,0.5145586,0.00006731231,0.00014358667,0.00004958313,0.03523709,0.000009427116,0.0016304103,0.44257098,0.0030389896,0.00012760932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056978362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019258645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53043157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027389844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005020379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5819513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167159390","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00268.x","title":"Social Capital and Constraints on Legal Careers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Individual capital; Prestige; Social mobility; Social reproduction; Social status; Sociology; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Capital (architecture); Economic capital; Positive economics; Social psychology; Economics; Social science; Psychology; Economic growth; Human capital","score_opus":0.036560825825718804,"score_gpt":0.3748328916741761,"score_spread":0.3382720658484573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167159390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005945514,0.029160492,0.00000392971,0.20290244,0.00035945815,0.00046909304,0.000018678054,0.000096547614,0.76104385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90768844,0.04500705,0.00041528625,0.041564304,0.0009926176,0.00004184508,0.000040649153,0.000013809765,0.0042359764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914396,0.00011578386,0.00017548713,0.00014362959,0.0002421779,0.00017897085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957156,0.00010324739,0.00009386625,0.00007105382,0.00011210997,0.00004814702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000564917,0.000077596174,0.00013855162,0.0000010562054,0.00082126755,0.00014695965,0.00008507966,0.0000675833,0.0006003461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007940905,0.00007450784,0.000113030226,0.00024223515,0.00068529154,0.00032299254,0.000011278205,0.00022968453,0.000069538495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.4008946e-7,0.000027449789,0.00004638544,0.00007615964,0.000008299938,3.6097188e-7,0.0019918,3.1704722e-8,0.0000039129,0.8304558,0.16261703,0.0047724703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079179394,0.0000069515313,0.00034302854,0.00009661836,0.000029604471,0.0000013888371,0.0023767047,2.5102514e-7,0.0000022510055,0.0014905032,0.99547833,0.000095158786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032663387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010121177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90174294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074802025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028417615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6573369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168127562","doi":"10.7202/043043ar","title":"Does Section 7 of the Charter Protect the Right to be a Professional?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Law; Commission; Section (typography); Political science; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.013512202873371452,"score_gpt":0.3115571086391603,"score_spread":0.29804490576578885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168127562","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47870085,0.0000055136634,0.00027542384,0.48601082,0.00087725814,0.0005217877,0.0000048330317,0.000024792464,0.03357873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226248,0.000002686627,0.00023410711,0.008358053,0.0005388126,0.000094729294,9.1998703e-7,0.000004253015,0.068141624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992483,0.00020555653,0.000112206944,0.00008199903,0.00022318723,0.00012874287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994726,0.00015622446,0.00008839794,0.00015074806,0.00009603398,0.000035962672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007162782,0.000041880365,0.00004500238,0.000033729822,0.00082017615,0.00005108416,0.000209552,0.000083656734,0.0005134912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052764814,0.000019109853,0.000039047052,0.0004527589,0.0002051916,0.00019668856,0.000012689752,0.00037399144,0.00001757369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003580073,0.00018724978,0.0016609847,0.000016338361,0.000039698047,2.9983096e-7,0.40762618,0.000032686676,0.0039060721,0.5045363,0.06025498,0.021703431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004761562,0.000006929587,0.004911725,0.000009910874,0.000007931998,6.9591096e-7,0.008271864,0.000009812581,0.0022249157,0.0045831166,0.9798808,0.00004468096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009350378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004823553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9196258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023836107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029853432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63082147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170039425","doi":"10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.44.61","title":"A Comparative Study of Judicial Control in Iran, U.S.A and Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Secrecy; Accountability; Economic Justice; Supervisor; Control (management); Judicial review; Monopoly; Law; Language change; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.06776676158916817,"score_gpt":0.38355423183442583,"score_spread":0.31578747024525766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170039425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95993525,0.000005881151,0.000033737015,0.025846671,0.0002542373,0.000096327385,0.000006515697,0.0000022941015,0.013819116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891126,9.797219e-7,0.00003355927,0.00087908306,0.00013229299,0.0000044844314,6.4137646e-7,8.4180135e-7,0.00003684076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917424,0.0001070122,0.00018687599,0.00010124571,0.00035699905,0.00007362954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993405,0.0003845342,0.00014946618,0.000018051685,0.00008820016,0.000019263201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058034685,0.00003877367,0.00011679766,0.00008210818,0.0003339898,0.000053052114,0.0001344899,0.000013079468,0.000049670973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002392722,0.00003718621,0.0000073602323,0.00011944134,0.0006566649,0.00016360941,0.000013690307,0.0000642273,1.9249173e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034526034,0.00026034738,0.18861252,0.0000064673172,0.000036179605,9.2792345e-7,0.12027144,0.000017155027,0.00057485705,0.6870636,0.0027439278,0.0003780908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011866604,0.0001616073,0.86181176,0.000017548848,0.000023424787,4.5903383e-7,0.11020693,0.00022278562,0.000013618113,0.0043866714,0.021819409,0.00014911804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70261574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8429999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6826769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003178661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019615755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29936454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174156855","doi":"","title":"Student Perspectives on Legal Education: A Longitudinal Empirical Evaluation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.07154966653307505,"score_gpt":0.4846964851039078,"score_spread":0.41314681857083274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174156855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6789433,0.0042020665,0.00048448736,0.10336536,0.0026492348,0.0003740138,6.734242e-7,0.000047086494,0.2099338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892268,0.00075643393,0.00007822013,0.00059229287,0.0037538065,0.000032367607,0.0000032535188,0.000009889992,0.005546893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681246,0.000586686,0.00021989664,0.00015018429,0.0009204986,0.001310246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987389,0.00013844506,0.00018320093,0.00012869958,0.00064544013,0.00016531539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007334927,0.00010063892,0.00008966667,0.00017650444,0.0010797277,0.00029309845,0.00021329333,0.00006878165,0.0009105935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010824,0.00009285268,0.00007165292,0.0005278723,0.000091136724,0.0014864481,0.000012163724,0.0019676876,0.00022246932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018485796,0.0009050134,0.0208901,5.202979e-7,0.000056152563,8.756421e-8,0.04036495,0.0000039014244,0.0000031339698,0.91388965,0.0034014801,0.020466546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033784148,0.00017615205,0.04705484,0.0000107308,0.00008994277,0.00009190055,0.5581522,0.000004608681,0.000004324309,0.04117227,0.35270184,0.00020334273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000605769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015234457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8727174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038367566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026160479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174160031","doi":"","title":"Twenty Years of Student Scholarship: Celebrating the Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Champion; Editorial board; Law; Theme (computing); Scholarship; Van Dyke beard; Sociology; Management; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.08876129895759702,"score_gpt":0.3814368503961834,"score_spread":0.29267555143858637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174160031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9411224,0.00069410604,0.000019254267,0.0044631246,0.0014925997,0.00016498943,0.0000028867069,0.00001831655,0.052022297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962671,0.00009748693,0.0011501043,0.0008016419,0.00042001664,0.000005661561,4.1918207e-7,0.000007677594,0.0012499015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982739,0.0004288307,0.00046002047,0.00009733639,0.0005665951,0.00017332433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807096,0.0003438472,0.0005566657,0.00019549728,0.0007444172,0.00008862656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029033434,0.00007167589,0.00016316741,0.00005859866,0.0004879656,0.00015959318,0.00048137887,0.00005025038,0.000538255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020007812,0.000055797052,0.0000776639,0.00044427693,0.00035602038,0.0013020718,0.000061863626,0.000561795,0.000039283266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003115814,0.00038256374,0.046524473,0.00001740262,0.00025360435,0.000009927269,0.11278278,0.00000757914,0.00045438093,0.83121604,0.005189691,0.0031304136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007148946,0.00021302719,0.17011188,0.0001338352,0.00016141965,0.000012387038,0.18042442,8.006974e-7,0.002245945,0.010303705,0.6354009,0.00027682248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022127663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036444205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8209123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006638346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006251191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5893514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177332101","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1213","title":"Book Review: Lawyers Gone Bad: Money, Sex and Madness in Canada's Legal Profession, by Philip Stayton","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018064852333683924,"score_gpt":0.31290687390916416,"score_spread":0.29484202157548023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177332101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043800534,0.067762665,0.000025472584,0.38024226,0.0011994311,0.00047317176,0.000025614145,0.00002992449,0.5458614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8656879,0.054615766,0.0001371529,0.04564859,0.00034929765,0.000022881406,0.000015846364,0.000020156853,0.03350238],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807286,0.00045945964,0.00041083206,0.0001748479,0.00054241857,0.00033960215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990108,0.00014302632,0.00025392315,0.00012947047,0.00020151093,0.00026127617],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011139223,0.0001172492,0.00020390599,0.000047664496,0.0013805518,0.00010948377,0.00020836141,0.000068177884,0.0021614062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030264573,0.00010874266,0.00002736724,0.00033160523,0.00016762601,0.0011642736,0.000025783007,0.00086588756,0.000015526333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010585378,0.000076383214,0.0020576485,0.000028750226,0.000012111184,0.000045256886,0.0020498703,0.0000017273798,0.000034711557,0.029558636,0.9651626,0.00096175773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026160685,0.000009781794,0.0006175914,0.00017013699,0.0000114428585,0.000103872895,0.002311739,0.0000042373176,0.000039108458,0.00043474173,0.9958907,0.00014506007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9768928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86130786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050272845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042722397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182702202","doi":"","title":"The Women Lawyers Forum is having a Launch Party on June 5 th - and you're invited!","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Political science; Law; History; Library science; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.03330211264235411,"score_gpt":0.34643417462192005,"score_spread":0.31313206197956595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182702202","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14696544,0.000020060228,0.000007020111,0.6270293,0.00032971654,0.00017891258,0.0000016104909,0.000039089642,0.22542883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8736462,0.0000620345,0.00008850944,0.03231413,0.000092720154,0.00007061082,0.0000012711594,0.000004562879,0.093719944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926656,0.00008262762,0.00010654926,0.000111060224,0.00018624046,0.0002469718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992594,0.00036154292,0.000056057535,0.00012883989,0.00010602743,0.00008813829],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005433925,0.000052679974,0.000047326612,0.00003024805,0.0011969777,0.00057259557,0.000114413306,0.000044330685,0.0029912188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046761901,0.000033691347,0.000012796531,0.0003210689,0.0001447126,0.0006414728,0.000022545177,0.00016307234,0.00022499393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003209277,0.000038443828,0.0048056906,0.0000019760375,0.00000954672,9.486675e-8,0.05887988,2.3443167e-7,0.000025718175,0.1187611,0.8050522,0.012421863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057208614,0.000012419416,0.002133104,0.0000023634161,0.0000016049823,1.2039885e-7,0.103796214,0.00001434256,0.000018416242,0.004525586,0.8893856,0.000053012398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009977281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005116443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72668076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006133502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012394958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99792016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W218311014","doi":"","title":"Revising Canada's Ethical Rules for Judges Returning to Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Economic Justice; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Practice of law; Subject (documents); Sociology; Legal profession; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.044098762609800175,"score_gpt":0.3789727393282665,"score_spread":0.3348739767184663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W218311014","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020054733,0.00089894386,0.022861395,0.8209307,0.001971928,0.0004903641,0.000004814239,0.00006006874,0.13272704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95961016,0.00087989686,0.013769808,0.017850485,0.0015100035,0.000020269754,0.0000043533587,0.000023493749,0.00633155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773115,0.00032408276,0.00024045969,0.0001332999,0.0003515764,0.0012194229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982336,0.00066587783,0.00021882521,0.000094408206,0.0006352216,0.00015206067],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006888904,0.00007466772,0.00009371139,0.00007495806,0.0012403326,0.00017841787,0.00024438012,0.000106914296,0.00015765526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01401678,0.00007236029,0.00003933274,0.00031368263,0.00004038859,0.000562636,0.000013638327,0.003108767,0.000017341688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004669489,0.000024646368,0.00017603912,0.000002283845,0.000041516105,0.0000010117607,0.010359532,8.6712305e-7,0.000023525074,0.96025366,0.012144839,0.016925393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097798715,0.00006550628,0.00013156768,0.000012430388,0.00003083793,0.000044758952,0.045174703,0.0000019403155,0.000021027487,0.06873746,0.885577,0.00010494307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35524854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.819596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9395554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016352728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033450134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183623604","doi":"","title":"An Exploration on the Construction and Improvement of Administrative Legal Supervision Mechanism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Legitimacy; Administrative law; Business; Power (physics); Independence (probability theory); Administration (probate law); Law; Public administration; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.15560211855913025,"score_gpt":0.4070308589979758,"score_spread":0.25142874043884555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183623604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6191442,0.0000042000393,0.000312578,0.08054262,0.0009252347,0.00039904806,0.000021170643,0.00002006791,0.29863086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859947,0.0000029581643,0.00016619383,0.0009855027,0.00013904936,0.000010509952,0.0000022678169,0.0000018855818,0.00009215186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915224,0.00008981916,0.00010152224,0.00012999104,0.0003651922,0.00016126127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912214,0.000046347803,0.00007364131,0.00007577334,0.0004130264,0.0002690386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015334759,0.000041648676,0.000043737862,0.00009417082,0.0012894039,0.0002527732,0.00016930622,0.00003763026,0.000059487244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058702065,0.000034768145,0.000008527607,0.0007173741,0.00090352603,0.0017811158,0.0000067396422,0.00010046396,0.0000050706626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023105858,0.000009130239,0.00008561909,3.4559116e-7,7.721729e-7,1.7015357e-7,0.02704644,1.2351627e-7,0.0009841231,0.9643935,0.0002528062,0.007224683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001618607,0.00032165408,0.0005220679,0.0000071686395,0.000008229456,8.7970244e-7,0.8116013,0.000053776654,0.004912725,0.049778443,0.13246828,0.0001636057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06547569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07411672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91461504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029656783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00481485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99171823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184207463","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1229","title":"Book Notes: Raising the Bar: The Emerging Legal Profession in East Asia, by William P. Alford (ed)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Bar (unit); Law; Political science; East Asia; Engineering; Geography; Mechanical engineering; China; Meteorology","score_opus":0.03258198195336577,"score_gpt":0.3700367816752486,"score_spread":0.33745479972188286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184207463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002322962,0.0019857571,0.0025008284,0.35162234,0.0017789358,0.00028292107,0.0000023451255,0.00003318984,0.6394707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98559535,0.00025733552,0.0002026181,0.008483119,0.0009460166,0.0000064020796,0.0000028329478,0.000014451135,0.0044918726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997856,0.00048780543,0.00044532245,0.00014108045,0.0006015389,0.0004682357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858356,0.00059758424,0.00032567955,0.0001752628,0.00019684494,0.000121043515],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053982204,0.00011612595,0.00010594114,0.00006148357,0.0038293162,0.0006735558,0.0004544059,0.00009921263,0.0009826683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007331225,0.00007112668,0.000069549795,0.0004739018,0.00026790905,0.001647975,0.000037691043,0.0015450112,0.00005519908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052117233,0.00019866212,0.00183469,0.0000050160183,0.00003020973,0.000016338838,0.0393544,0.000037981812,0.00038542764,0.78110975,0.14990745,0.027067944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021023609,0.000013677767,0.0006385079,0.00005773492,0.000011634036,0.000033070413,0.020448502,0.000015190762,0.000093554496,0.004182704,0.97418565,0.00010954536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029058473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09417704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017831408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051104743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184355122","doi":"","title":"Poor Students, Well-Paid Lawyers: Post-Graduation Income-Contingent Tuition Fees for Law Schools","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Student debt; Government (linguistics); Subsidy; Debt; Obligation; Economics; Business; Labour economics; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.017610360077308373,"score_gpt":0.3602725144580236,"score_spread":0.34266215438071523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184355122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6735838,0.00096009794,0.017992673,0.28810945,0.0020144032,0.001398512,0.000013243981,0.00017478311,0.015753036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993632,0.00076880073,0.00061747746,0.0019482956,0.0010146133,0.00004493991,0.000027057466,0.000017524872,0.0019292552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748105,0.00017563891,0.00036418077,0.00017934157,0.00059021683,0.0012095888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868095,0.000114310125,0.00033332268,0.00010584452,0.0006503508,0.00011524283],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041220137,0.00011879128,0.00012450152,0.00014422378,0.0016104662,0.0006590497,0.00034660334,0.000096265176,0.00008700457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007835162,0.000118334196,0.00010684792,0.0003933293,0.00007469315,0.0016067635,0.000017755525,0.0015700142,0.00011861882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043147964,0.0001838008,0.0010299748,0.0000038497933,0.00007755136,3.0682e-7,0.0025565538,0.00002209526,0.0002415888,0.9931109,0.00021418165,0.0025160606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002181977,0.0004151012,0.0021428755,0.00006004074,0.00009338603,0.000034463817,0.048188213,0.0000034951388,0.00031468424,0.76924604,0.1770174,0.00030231633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052117216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031707805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32004824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002208102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00692325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184399030","doi":"","title":"Canadian Council of Parliamentary Ombudsman (CCPO) Conference","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Legislature; Political science; Overcrowding; Legislative assembly; Public administration; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.09592008218230637,"score_gpt":0.3519422608606551,"score_spread":0.25602217867834876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184399030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15455261,0.0000026713008,0.000013229132,0.0719924,0.0007177354,0.00007013665,0.0000069624757,0.000016575614,0.77262765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97825223,0.0000058721575,0.00074064394,0.0022203554,0.00009602177,0.000004387014,0.0000040360683,0.000002189706,0.01867424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939847,0.00003139096,0.00010606246,0.00006923877,0.00026026653,0.00013454503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990347,0.00007834543,0.000047702968,0.0001108712,0.00057939044,0.00014901462],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000675995,0.000032716544,0.000044677734,0.000038834118,0.00024251257,0.00007115988,0.00014285016,0.000049950635,0.018735163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058851956,0.00003182461,0.00001316339,0.00022683584,0.00013301343,0.00033813895,0.000004974502,0.00019358261,0.00012923269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001369175,0.000036788886,0.011121679,0.0000018279392,0.0000067596634,4.1918213e-7,0.022829536,1.3749961e-7,0.0007776976,0.8934751,0.06747421,0.004274465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041180367,0.0000048345614,0.0031452961,0.0000012634032,0.0000032817936,2.6676423e-7,0.011106313,0.000004682352,0.00016108273,0.0023560608,0.9831279,0.00004783707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9739783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99698913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9156537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002264595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01806289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98750377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185093975","doi":"","title":"ACTION RESEARCH: TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MOTION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Action research; Work (physics); Foundation (evidence); Public administration; Public relations; Library science; Management; Law; Engineering; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.4416218525598942,"score_gpt":0.5427644111011497,"score_spread":0.10114255854125548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185093975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5954241,0.000006578516,0.00016693126,0.02983802,0.0000716415,0.00004547599,2.0625485e-8,0.000030517074,0.37441674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745238,0.000060038936,0.00066063675,0.00014075724,0.00009425676,0.000004068447,8.5506366e-7,0.0000016195874,0.024513958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983785,0.0012348107,0.00005998611,0.000066149805,0.00016237207,0.0000981475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933225,0.0005329101,0.000016939453,0.000026777896,0.00006422876,0.000026878764],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004412002,0.000016397718,0.000021734038,0.00014128606,0.0019429189,0.000057966838,0.000026488968,0.000030468711,0.00020635837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005047277,0.000016648677,0.000003831178,0.00032724885,0.00008329632,0.0007220617,0.0000074381055,0.0010600304,0.000033940432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000080981135,0.00012408775,0.071471214,0.0000041761646,0.0000025279446,0.000002235423,0.3107815,0.000026504116,0.0005782156,0.4304586,0.00933557,0.17720725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079310004,0.00001174653,0.07820555,0.0000039655106,4.625412e-7,0.000002418978,0.095998384,0.00012251583,0.000021110965,0.0013642171,0.82414746,0.000042881464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029157499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004517104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8148119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006381241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015869463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185433022","doi":"","title":"Ministère de la Justice Canada","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Law","score_opus":0.04467924368519922,"score_gpt":0.35966986649896693,"score_spread":0.3149906228137677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185433022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026756981,0.0006987919,0.000045240755,0.369344,0.0021012002,0.000029092229,0.0000048824363,0.000012172024,0.62508893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45090547,0.00023140034,0.0008813764,0.011630795,0.0005215022,0.0000028718487,9.206102e-7,0.000003601119,0.53582203],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902815,0.00032573057,0.00012545825,0.00009458195,0.00019824009,0.00022786843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986232,0.0009902217,0.000056285964,0.00009220852,0.00010185676,0.00013621895],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041131774,0.000058112186,0.00005158461,0.000017920753,0.00046111442,0.00015805349,0.00012560564,0.00008795406,0.053299375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001059589,0.000064104504,0.000016819962,0.00058577134,0.00022782583,0.00034869034,0.00000868389,0.00027922055,0.00047604553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.438676e-7,0.000054827462,0.00017703885,0.000007606358,0.000005115773,0.000004267137,0.006905708,0.0000030082558,0.0000014257535,0.40180728,0.5838497,0.0071837567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048230642,0.000004796626,0.0005021477,0.000005459863,0.000045856395,0.000008076788,0.015417203,0.00030222157,0.0000066729226,0.000553383,0.98302007,0.00008590982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97346276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9429056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44822976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003621833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002520182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94756603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185929987","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of Sexual Harassment Case Law in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026691242199869264,"score_gpt":0.3391945409601972,"score_spread":0.3125032987603279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185929987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5662389,0.000022343873,0.00002753026,0.0822151,0.0003527467,0.00016907239,0.000001209329,0.0000053939607,0.35096774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951437,0.0000014784786,0.00006188076,0.00043374597,0.000025040012,0.000014697414,3.6654637e-7,7.9699566e-7,0.0043182964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995872,0.00007448011,0.00010154285,0.000036321926,0.00012080467,0.00007967135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995617,0.00021244,0.000038506965,0.000059815004,0.00010386059,0.000023678716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029281218,0.000017016477,0.000021801252,0.000010596301,0.00024618287,0.00003914055,0.00005143919,0.000010553041,0.00063834264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014275617,0.00001200331,0.0000026306056,0.00020802782,0.00005131556,0.00024614556,0.0000053577437,0.00006289855,0.000013985187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.6493537e-7,0.000013973102,0.004051851,7.774924e-7,0.0000019418042,0.0000013549405,0.0023179017,0.0000045211127,0.000025617323,0.96682805,0.024418185,0.0023353712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100908794,0.000012048623,0.020652637,0.0000018507245,0.0000035757646,0.0000060831067,0.40359163,0.00020057883,0.000037852005,0.004100499,0.57121897,0.00007335543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99992186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96272755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006545356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035656374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69894046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2188068900","doi":"","title":"Best Practices and Recommendations for Patient Care Complaints Management within the Vancouver Island Health Authority","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Best practice; Health care; Nursing; Business; Medicine; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0751873828736809,"score_gpt":0.38299284035004816,"score_spread":0.30780545747636723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2188068900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6412359,0.0010998367,0.0007809731,0.14465389,0.0032919163,0.003876131,0.000029030974,0.00010276,0.20492958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835439,0.00025096533,0.0021453123,0.00005106358,0.00012822988,0.000007615096,0.00001098984,0.0000048621123,0.013857107],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832714,0.0008419452,0.0001149729,0.00018508213,0.00033730504,0.00019353555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978307,0.00087865366,0.0003113484,0.00011474581,0.00073650584,0.0001280483],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001376554,0.000053514737,0.00008729563,0.000095601354,0.0050503802,0.00023196983,0.00014201672,0.00004932365,0.00009381341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047250467,0.0000517651,0.000018063898,0.00028603117,0.00032260662,0.00062096963,0.000081724895,0.0005048604,0.0000072320017],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001508002,0.00037148435,0.01599345,0.00037352796,0.00018607992,0.000004123299,0.67137814,0.000028256263,0.000068233276,0.0441737,0.20645161,0.060820624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014667612,0.00021525276,0.0016486817,0.000028331368,0.000007742627,5.6350484e-7,0.39674458,0.00006805652,0.0000020267296,0.00028346103,0.6008126,0.000042032883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03993344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015546312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.394361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013338107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003118086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189473434","doi":"","title":"Courtroom Technology Competence as a Lawyer’s Ethical Duty: What Should Regulators Do About It?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Competence (human resources); Duty; Legal ethics; Political science; Law; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.052276843393594744,"score_gpt":0.4046213014997844,"score_spread":0.3523444581061897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189473434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04971219,0.0044587376,0.0010638749,0.9141366,0.0018579629,0.00019873893,9.1794425e-7,0.0001400769,0.028430888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789635,0.006636916,0.0002894196,0.007881219,0.00075567106,0.000012158473,0.0000023596597,0.000018762896,0.005439988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964082,0.00039914696,0.00037548263,0.00023837925,0.0008259782,0.001752761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818605,0.0002091778,0.00029488426,0.0002358699,0.00080127566,0.00027276558],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066461596,0.00014515928,0.00019242495,0.0002776504,0.0009453732,0.00081097236,0.00058764115,0.00050664623,0.00029962277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025749996,0.00013569689,0.00007351588,0.0011989359,0.0004770838,0.0015205191,0.000046183097,0.007845612,0.0003128014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024874958,0.00006214572,0.00055865257,9.353431e-7,0.000044698434,0.0000036873937,0.0053479886,0.000007614941,0.000025871075,0.9753182,0.0061165206,0.012488807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002406717,0.00010734694,0.00003199875,0.000025586509,0.00001791314,0.00018316985,0.09359421,0.0000071497752,0.000015325195,0.40503362,0.50062263,0.00012038369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001186916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008830233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9292513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015630599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0268882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99444336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192989477","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1984635","title":"Regulating Law Firms in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02030773793246171,"score_gpt":0.3233077561499192,"score_spread":0.3030000182174575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192989477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7459774,0.0011727315,0.00014781328,0.066030346,0.0014851097,0.000103576545,8.389258e-7,0.000013802873,0.18506838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960793,0.00016298138,0.000054386113,0.0007905955,0.000592505,0.000001973332,9.3783547e-7,0.000004607026,0.0023126744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980221,0.00014426927,0.00015954058,0.000045788554,0.00023273726,0.0013955843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996025,0.00010644395,0.00010010631,0.000051048795,0.000058959296,0.00008091857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025988359,0.000041617022,0.00005227461,0.000038210404,0.00045430273,0.000058491165,0.00011658687,0.00002638724,0.00016544589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030418576,0.00004057336,0.000015268342,0.00033084958,0.000027593778,0.0008215462,0.0000063670163,0.0014236744,0.000013150957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002019997,0.000016375077,0.032026883,3.803446e-7,0.000006487949,1.6216572e-7,0.002717927,0.0000055822034,0.0000072551406,0.9600004,0.00043956563,0.0047769807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026700823,0.000015365678,0.011301845,0.00001158228,0.0000090611775,0.000052656505,0.13078065,0.000011924812,0.000026507949,0.13734023,0.71999687,0.00018627093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9847384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82266015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004120916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030255103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195711783","doi":"10.18352/erlacs.10124","title":"New Challenges for Fieldworkers in Latin American and Caribbean Studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies | Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Harm; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.12730303320707215,"score_gpt":0.3962051698002827,"score_spread":0.26890213659321055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195711783","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15780662,0.66585237,0.0006133479,0.088182524,0.0008383226,0.0042773867,0.0001555235,0.00037678817,0.08189714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5913049,0.38882285,0.013220381,0.005014293,0.00054597494,0.000093519884,0.00002399392,0.00010413806,0.00086996355],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938422,0.0025961604,0.0013807999,0.0008623412,0.00058164954,0.0007368722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943048,0.0019626494,0.0016059517,0.00057971186,0.0010460162,0.0005009117],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004081943,0.000555582,0.0018104769,0.00023875153,0.00046001977,0.00012503436,0.00045103172,0.000036820293,0.000009755352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011222409,0.0005053782,0.00019107663,0.0017994728,0.0024532275,0.0002844792,0.00040429525,0.00056635664,0.000010631941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015499497,0.0002782759,0.08628361,0.0035629186,0.0012790731,0.000069027796,0.14263092,0.000021155756,0.0000231122,0.029713003,0.08888741,0.6470965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095413375,0.00086152396,0.05839993,0.0028552723,0.00048931333,0.000009594576,0.24809289,0.000014282133,0.0000028949091,0.000084386294,0.687375,0.0008608043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032398107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009030033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6462357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002737729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074013986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197219838","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2619","title":"Book Notes: The Paradox of Professionalism: Lawyers and the Possibility of Justice, by Scott L. Cummings (eds)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02925973481246088,"score_gpt":0.352465225754909,"score_spread":0.32320549094244816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197219838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035849575,0.008803619,0.00024501138,0.47165373,0.0012268566,0.0007710591,0.000021650534,0.000021135467,0.48140737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99207395,0.00052708015,0.0002550173,0.0044256304,0.00013067052,0.000013729905,0.0000013862028,0.000005434147,0.0025670868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982713,0.0006033551,0.0004044511,0.000097572905,0.00044947845,0.00017382688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972155,0.0014931045,0.0005309302,0.00017355343,0.00051372737,0.00007316235],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025229119,0.000076078744,0.00014704332,0.000022783901,0.0013275937,0.00019051865,0.00032059225,0.00006959967,0.0012049531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001267042,0.000040013616,0.000060104332,0.00021338437,0.0013301224,0.0008651578,0.0000350078,0.0005547826,0.000013120416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041564985,0.000119883975,0.00048129552,0.000022367856,0.00003720817,2.0497207e-7,0.01814538,0.000002905848,0.00019939689,0.92548805,0.05340689,0.0020548436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017834514,0.00007255813,0.002929687,0.00016981689,0.00028222875,0.000030416875,0.041751243,0.00012629111,0.0006023454,0.20138063,0.7506155,0.00025583044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08771557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068535414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025926993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040506566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219836483","doi":"","title":"Teaching Legal Ethics a Quarter of a Century After Watergate","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.030421778966431567,"score_gpt":0.35889865140448973,"score_spread":0.3284768724380582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219836483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28589752,0.00006411104,0.00020021497,0.11508304,0.0007754718,0.000079221056,0.0000036511701,0.000038695154,0.5978581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99317414,0.000028111186,0.0012353889,0.0024017917,0.0006796763,0.000002605791,8.5471163e-7,0.000007176486,0.0024702728],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986113,0.00038375,0.0003038912,0.00008528861,0.00038607427,0.00022974306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999221,0.00021275408,0.00017109927,0.0000715561,0.00021276048,0.0001107979],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002243792,0.000066206,0.00008939585,0.00005102625,0.0012954002,0.00036589775,0.00014419646,0.00008970858,0.006043583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004018539,0.000057682697,0.000059022168,0.00013583341,0.00017568939,0.0011043207,0.000007888115,0.0016956492,0.000079298006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015027446,0.00034352895,0.0009954184,0.000027336606,0.000057142974,0.00003429578,0.49708578,0.00002890943,0.0004800983,0.46090496,0.005020026,0.03487224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015344155,0.00002143558,0.00025465386,0.000057412737,0.000011419549,0.000053335003,0.009525795,0.000009937429,0.000030879473,0.0021318607,0.98766565,0.00008416878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015943585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002664885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98264563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047645364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039675942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198500276","doi":"","title":"Doctoral Studies in Law: From the Inside Out","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Doctoral dissertation; Sociology; Ethnography; Doctoral studies; Space (punctuation); Law; Political science; Pedagogy; Higher education","score_opus":0.1846878715239056,"score_gpt":0.42051282082914504,"score_spread":0.23582494930523945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198500276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3194525,0.0019652736,0.000010317868,0.16906726,0.0046213027,0.00035158213,0.000019252595,0.00012564468,0.5043869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806609,0.000049703936,0.00037336166,0.012739558,0.0009940426,0.00003169304,0.00000809076,0.00000694139,0.005135694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986893,0.00038993743,0.00021559134,0.0001601071,0.00033601196,0.00020904922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987058,0.00059747935,0.00008871898,0.00023064068,0.00025084085,0.00012649938],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011792467,0.00007987343,0.000117627824,0.000023002423,0.00044516497,0.0002691037,0.00027612285,0.00006365611,0.00032069877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026551797,0.000060136284,0.000028367705,0.00033895342,0.0005142521,0.0009887982,0.000052949912,0.00039763673,0.00091118243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009270372,0.000051527048,0.01079049,0.0000011349376,0.000020422844,0.0000032346154,0.055774495,0.0000052591636,0.000010743893,0.8480454,0.085038655,0.0002493892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021039128,0.00000894486,0.0015477834,0.0000136151875,0.000007640535,1.9863622e-7,0.038045492,0.0000011028849,0.000025661855,0.04221303,0.9178403,0.000085811625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.163959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.435445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8328017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001942061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005858211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2199563901","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139128834.017","title":"Ontario’s ‘<i>shariʽa</i> court’: law and politics intertwined","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.039518934275217195,"score_gpt":0.26083804570055574,"score_spread":0.22131911142533855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2199563901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000101489815,0.000028456716,0.000035271867,0.0017694391,0.00051137066,0.0003449287,0.000084410516,0.00008140678,0.99704325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038164265,0.000041655487,0.0001359185,0.0017381473,0.00028366758,0.0000010101168,0.00004217602,0.000019731233,0.9939213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895597,0.00005696933,0.00016488449,0.00030219936,0.00025875893,0.00026122734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998722,0.00015495888,0.00021017948,0.00027595524,0.00039141448,0.0002454752],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001541579,0.00020587035,0.00021938488,0.00010872015,0.0007548675,0.00027782985,0.00032061466,0.00034499407,0.0002714861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037276193,0.00025256485,0.00007556229,0.000010306737,0.00066500943,0.00041977514,0.0001546429,0.0007562446,0.00007970042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066491293,0.00000793597,0.000002711573,0.0000113970145,0.000048580154,0.000011504659,0.002141405,2.5809992e-8,0.000002009494,0.84471625,0.15290114,0.00015037623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019804666,0.000017307224,0.00001125395,0.0000503127,0.000113154885,0.0000033023794,0.0005160638,0.0000016072894,0.0000072724756,0.00022595668,0.9985834,0.00027233074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30815598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018381385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84568226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005649244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010472157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2199580116","doi":"","title":"Resisting the Hidden Curriculum: Teaching for Social Justice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Curriculum; Scholarship; Criminal justice; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Socialization; Political science; Criminal law; Pedagogy; Law; Identity (music); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.04700363773337909,"score_gpt":0.3885684980306408,"score_spread":0.34156486029726174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2199580116","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16177714,0.0013349436,0.01637466,0.59206647,0.0028391324,0.0006215302,0.000003981099,0.00014155045,0.22484061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97907,0.00040910608,0.0005093196,0.0009777083,0.0044189044,0.000014584418,0.0000020521018,0.000010586379,0.014587721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979381,0.0003374577,0.00020225672,0.000097233824,0.00029011053,0.0011348237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898034,0.00045095626,0.00022181931,0.000062277824,0.00024202839,0.00004260064],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005298079,0.00006611335,0.00007272053,0.00005193184,0.011901324,0.00016574361,0.00030192346,0.000055340093,0.00003947748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003052879,0.000050565763,0.000098001976,0.00025532232,0.00012000361,0.0005113143,0.00001227602,0.0024906176,0.000018422548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068564786,0.000038677907,0.0002323313,0.0000016295025,0.00003342401,3.3752653e-7,0.012502841,8.4964176e-7,0.000011175696,0.9510452,0.025122682,0.011003985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023672014,0.000038043352,0.0003509821,0.0000047996264,0.000095811716,0.000097950324,0.098706245,0.000020363632,0.0000015821239,0.19971333,0.7006162,0.00011800647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011082886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021927922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81729287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065491314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075751035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200182845","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1188","title":"Not So Dangerous Liaisons: A Clinical Perspective on Interdisciplinarity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Space (punctuation); Quality (philosophy); Legal education; Engineering ethics; Narrative; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Public relations; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.10539369464726837,"score_gpt":0.5174340682983596,"score_spread":0.4120403736510912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200182845","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12360858,0.000017790333,0.000111496025,0.5276398,0.000811508,0.00006773814,0.0000039861197,0.000013518329,0.34772557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97410744,0.000041588697,0.00015780906,0.017063484,0.007989044,8.9585757e-7,2.708965e-7,0.000004831986,0.0006346221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987181,0.00048509912,0.0003237118,0.00008112925,0.00024892626,0.00014303048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986374,0.00043830453,0.00034789724,0.00005047738,0.00042023478,0.000105707884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00202019,0.000059109767,0.00017774696,0.00008614382,0.0010908749,0.00024276903,0.00012936567,0.00011166902,0.000035705005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018848117,0.000051013645,0.000101600024,0.00016602727,0.000549091,0.00037717822,0.000025831816,0.0005675583,0.000014066205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046071582,0.00013102582,0.00010301184,0.0000015868865,0.000020712094,7.245004e-7,0.077145986,8.4211614e-8,0.0000035191288,0.9109816,0.0045046913,0.0070610037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004369799,0.0002599216,0.005899251,0.000013931102,0.000026738018,0.000004888471,0.028076278,0.0000016902851,0.0000046063105,0.06790938,0.8972747,0.000091640206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008771956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021076512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001676091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084500824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201480063","doi":"","title":"Community-Based Access to Justice – Building a Responsive Justice System in New Brunswick","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Monopoly; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07341239473143475,"score_gpt":0.42234782855517156,"score_spread":0.3489354338237368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201480063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6455559,0.0019996003,0.06519393,0.2255526,0.005515697,0.0010198045,0.000003172802,0.00021868042,0.054940607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991296,0.00013481709,0.0009055929,0.0038710905,0.001356012,0.000005497008,0.000001990932,0.00001709595,0.0024119278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546677,0.0017119178,0.0003491508,0.000103244856,0.00040390642,0.0019649945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978614,0.0010518704,0.00024669748,0.00019990522,0.0003037404,0.00033638068],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011239001,0.000118323216,0.00014959997,0.00041831864,0.0017135106,0.00034017683,0.00068953395,0.00009928823,0.000053136187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038150635,0.0001230887,0.000047572517,0.0016600252,0.000045811634,0.0018285296,0.000048508038,0.004191686,0.00009231104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120450364,0.00014186153,0.0022665376,0.000037616734,0.000023928544,0.0000011587614,0.018594932,0.00017144867,0.00008215842,0.97219837,0.003720576,0.0026409482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010504128,0.00017227556,0.006291725,0.00020848583,0.0004180665,0.00010904091,0.34928867,0.000048817834,0.00008768696,0.011691171,0.63016856,0.00046508832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040391445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09388379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9605072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003233024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045018766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201745179","doi":"","title":"WHAT IF WE DIDN’T WAIT? CANADIAN LAW SOCIETIES AND THE PROMOTION OF EFFECTIVE ETHICAL INFRASTRUCTURE IN LAW PRACTICES","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Promotion (chess); Political science","score_opus":0.011541557436710329,"score_gpt":0.3333822246115954,"score_spread":0.3218406671748851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201745179","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11928489,0.0015587884,0.00026041674,0.838394,0.0009277464,0.0005747541,0.0000014692066,0.000015259027,0.03898266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932008,0.0039850706,0.000034622437,0.0021711593,0.00027484336,0.00001194207,0.0000012942644,0.000005896132,0.0003143675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743116,0.0012956908,0.00020177242,0.000107778586,0.0002758412,0.0006877647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836034,0.0008944375,0.00038681566,0.000078168996,0.00019874382,0.000081476224],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007753688,0.00007645727,0.00012634427,0.00006583911,0.0008349689,0.0004037401,0.0001712103,0.00019242783,0.0000463673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017245952,0.000054451262,0.000037790673,0.00029604931,0.000849992,0.001408908,0.0000126670275,0.0038875625,0.0000028643428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002359728,0.000015045264,0.00025709582,0.000004927778,0.000026730317,1.0423124e-7,0.022783274,0.0000062082254,0.000009787492,0.9693753,0.0001468851,0.007351047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004858066,0.00008404839,0.0008243026,0.000033387543,0.000024485029,0.000020839778,0.05170409,0.00004482941,0.000014676715,0.81023276,0.13645819,0.00007258805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19423978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84297884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8739159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000620604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004608624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201892303","doi":"","title":"Derrick Bell: Ethical Ambition and Law Teaching","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03768112833724368,"score_gpt":0.40022285156439225,"score_spread":0.36254172322714856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201892303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029127903,0.0000049791197,0.00037449942,0.3053685,0.00011029375,0.000074630865,1.6496156e-7,0.000047872796,0.6648912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649684,0.000006027251,0.0024179516,0.02134935,0.00012517959,0.000010890902,0.0000017240046,0.0000021678268,0.011118346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995031,0.00015057472,0.00007214645,0.00006929988,0.00011645517,0.00008847608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995748,0.00022154574,0.000023817449,0.000044423996,0.00007685193,0.000058556205],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005489621,0.000026283511,0.000028731512,0.000019723513,0.0007194434,0.00028405164,0.000038175425,0.00008946045,0.0029300314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049999804,0.000023469782,0.000007780544,0.00008704233,0.0001153477,0.00066722714,0.000009844039,0.0004413927,0.0002956917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.9243222e-7,0.000013825322,0.00023075427,8.863353e-7,0.000001289317,4.0362643e-8,0.0066183945,5.986001e-8,0.00006693232,0.95920616,0.030428762,0.003432706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000392232,0.000005537589,0.0021164692,0.0000019581514,0.0000021309315,5.9904363e-7,0.0070413495,0.00002364057,0.000017348926,0.03503047,0.9556746,0.000046684465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.081302576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053818324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9358405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018867244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007845204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203974900","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1187","title":"Poverty Law, Access to Justice, and Ethical Lawyering: Celebrating 40 Years of Clinical Education at Osgoode Hall Law School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Legal education; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10444906302504327,"score_gpt":0.5056466276795187,"score_spread":0.4011975646544755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203974900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3263685,0.000033322725,0.000052248663,0.200503,0.000961362,0.00013972106,0.000006709652,0.000012717936,0.4719224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94061685,0.000047663892,0.00059518975,0.054374076,0.0039508888,0.0000016284869,0.000001033735,0.000007378902,0.00040527407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839276,0.00042799956,0.00058245193,0.000107678985,0.000324577,0.00016451419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982161,0.0005401941,0.000519275,0.00006572001,0.00039940566,0.0002593296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021638053,0.00006951629,0.00024525943,0.00006564936,0.0006950055,0.00028919688,0.00017309168,0.00023643543,0.00005272592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024881726,0.00006847591,0.000068027526,0.00020172313,0.00036634284,0.0005934511,0.00006989963,0.00063905376,0.0000052280734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037244856,0.000068401976,0.0003925685,0.000026949925,0.000015410107,2.4904446e-7,0.008746782,8.3690026e-7,0.00008230074,0.98130816,0.005443609,0.003877474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044953686,0.00012564723,0.016513702,0.000047576475,0.00009620783,0.000007215121,0.0035144996,0.000006988697,0.000049260318,0.049025215,0.9300055,0.00015868382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04549732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019192336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.932283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074381285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011385492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205727972","doi":"","title":"The 'Approved' Common Law Degree","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03333612355647054,"score_gpt":0.3636706820454093,"score_spread":0.3303345584889388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205727972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010622242,0.0012463611,0.0005053109,0.42502102,0.0005895178,0.000113015914,3.4136542e-7,0.000045807938,0.5618564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98320246,0.0018470524,0.00003496321,0.0027069165,0.0006068873,0.0000019000958,7.390254e-7,0.000003999272,0.011595113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813783,0.00021523428,0.0001676612,0.00006856876,0.0002687386,0.0011419539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935985,0.00018737846,0.00013247816,0.000114243354,0.00014367237,0.0000623673],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036099143,0.000055462355,0.00005510137,0.000026735646,0.002760405,0.0004239872,0.00033594616,0.000046478173,0.00004426076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025177133,0.000039399336,0.000046081324,0.00029787107,0.00012297288,0.00052472175,0.0000059464483,0.0020929528,0.00006318449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006645822,0.000027266995,0.000058341808,7.555768e-8,0.000011007634,1.942071e-7,0.001104768,5.862697e-7,0.000011237865,0.9191225,0.001945277,0.0777121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000657173,0.000039609098,0.00017747648,0.0000011007387,0.000004997806,0.000016217715,0.0067587784,0.000001686637,0.0000037155737,0.4993067,0.4935877,0.000036287405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018100383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06791695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004753739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206508939","doi":"","title":"A first for this top legal mind: practising law; Former Supreme Court justice shares advice as she begins the next phase of her high-profile career back in Montreal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; High Court; Advice (programming); Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.07041091807254532,"score_gpt":0.38197183116026057,"score_spread":0.3115609130877153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206508939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060855355,0.00005673985,0.0006780918,0.1597178,0.00089251576,0.001043174,0.000085030944,0.00004047594,0.7766308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96237785,0.000017450486,0.0035906106,0.003735693,0.00047428042,0.00009574625,0.000047634978,0.000014906563,0.029645855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985611,0.00017533441,0.00034559896,0.00023031457,0.00036399605,0.0003236545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969857,0.0019672513,0.00023920785,0.00025620748,0.00047005585,0.00008157879],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012166334,0.00012247937,0.00016651968,0.00007410198,0.00065606827,0.00033840485,0.00030840194,0.0001139384,0.008915343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021554166,0.000093364615,0.00006086415,0.00045464738,0.00016991427,0.0020806433,0.000032328608,0.00026666393,0.0002038681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029302866,0.00087784074,0.00036157473,0.00010749869,0.00007222915,0.000001622164,0.07338296,0.00007271894,0.00031501974,0.573572,0.33876717,0.012176346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008740077,0.00009669609,0.00035992108,0.00002357085,0.00008436973,0.0000015889867,0.025216449,0.0010309332,0.0003204174,0.0006829963,0.9711631,0.00014597026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28206092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26241452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90152246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009561033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046516964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206897579","doi":"10.18438/b8h30f","title":"A Training Needs Analysis Case Study at Legal Aid Queensland","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Training (meteorology); Plan (archaeology); Work (physics); Needs analysis; Computer science; Descriptive statistics; Knowledge management; Needs assessment; Medical education; Engineering management; Engineering; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.08408454456420247,"score_gpt":0.3779851728669892,"score_spread":0.29390062830278674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206897579","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4061684,0.00037875987,0.001909568,0.43535608,0.0006441195,0.00091496756,0.000016516953,0.0003341751,0.15427741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685654,0.00007551071,0.0019651481,0.026957165,0.00014872642,0.00003648775,0.00003208326,0.0000049993423,0.0022144625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978837,0.0008930951,0.0004331916,0.00012491574,0.00047203453,0.0001930772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651706,0.002323777,0.00042702572,0.00021396388,0.00023294492,0.00028521166],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026063353,0.000109438944,0.00014485834,0.0006024394,0.0008433045,0.0014747182,0.00014226475,0.00007199846,0.0005858913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006673373,0.00010609282,0.000041811287,0.003274436,0.000096858705,0.29172647,0.00005553026,0.00029800073,0.00008434309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008342291,0.00045719912,0.04794686,0.000033376622,0.0004400815,0.000305068,0.44130388,0.0009788048,0.000001969703,0.46896082,0.021464879,0.017272837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027523653,0.00008919436,0.00077196513,0.000009113217,0.0002145688,0.00009195072,0.28641,0.0006100749,0.000003815921,0.000019025514,0.71139437,0.00011069284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028580928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004949797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6899295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048182526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016680192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207776214","doi":"","title":"The Community Legal Clinic Quality Assurance Program: An Innovative Experience in Quality Assurance in Legal Aid","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Quality (philosophy); QA/QC; Business; Engineering management; Engineering; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.18983497243007907,"score_gpt":0.5344663109563755,"score_spread":0.34463133852629646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207776214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7321595,0.000024438988,0.000018130773,0.025268197,0.00027934305,0.00052268704,0.0000065593294,0.00010418513,0.24161695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872251,0.00008517727,0.0010969572,0.0020902941,0.00010579916,0.00029602277,0.000015033138,0.0000093733,0.009076236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903698,0.0069451844,0.0011657418,0.00033137208,0.0006337308,0.0005541985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477375,0.0035514468,0.00033709512,0.00069214404,0.00053677574,0.00010881959],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01384991,0.00017465692,0.0002768814,0.000091597816,0.0016550119,0.0007450741,0.0009143186,0.00015618136,0.0014362093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064513455,0.00014546451,0.000046242443,0.003988227,0.0009657647,0.0038484177,0.000039464303,0.0017313563,0.00010345307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035282568,0.0034834938,0.29918465,0.000022095672,0.000017281489,0.0000038524245,0.2205491,0.000020129395,0.000072587485,0.32157636,0.0022836877,0.15243393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000350055,0.00004863139,0.4478511,0.000014077699,8.507452e-7,4.885342e-7,0.06457769,0.000012430599,0.00003066023,0.000811214,0.48611006,0.00019276844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30897146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57451206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48382637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025247692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018887762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209310675","doi":"","title":"Separating Powers at the University: Applying Constitutional Law to Internal Academic Governance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of powers; Bureaucracy; Institution; Political science; Scholarship; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Law; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Administrative law; Public administration; Administration (probate law); Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Management","score_opus":0.03611892015735141,"score_gpt":0.331099732155242,"score_spread":0.2949808119978906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209310675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06264663,0.0007015052,0.010384051,0.058840994,0.00128505,0.00032059837,0.0000068973545,0.000051308434,0.86576295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978586,0.0005639967,0.00013708758,0.0016820814,0.00030196313,0.0000022403783,8.391223e-7,0.000003911352,0.018721877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984516,0.0001620808,0.00014945952,0.00011271979,0.00030259267,0.00082156714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940974,0.000118636926,0.00018138382,0.00007246847,0.0001265441,0.00009123224],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020288245,0.00006641779,0.00005925292,0.00003530451,0.0020018762,0.00006121975,0.00038310495,0.00005673551,0.0006729779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002653885,0.00005694983,0.000046004858,0.00034743195,0.00044461802,0.0006681441,0.00004758234,0.0021075453,0.00023175606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029675171,0.000010551948,0.0010059865,3.4353445e-7,0.000028852317,0.0000012329598,0.0069998894,0.00000817712,0.000059483937,0.9881384,0.001756235,0.001961213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014273802,0.000028564655,0.00027120393,0.000014554007,0.000015703346,0.00008913044,0.029636519,0.0000038508347,0.00003588914,0.03646822,0.93319714,0.000096466196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035494477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0149668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9516701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020312355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052260305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209528132","doi":"","title":"Doubting what the Elders have to say","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Law; Mandate; Objectivity (philosophy); Supreme court; Sovereignty; Oral history; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Rules of evidence; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.17541120754902445,"score_gpt":0.4751415685260832,"score_spread":0.29973036097705874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209528132","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08978157,0.00018654016,0.00069348974,0.89722323,0.0056813993,0.0001738487,4.0457684e-7,0.000007085728,0.006252425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830831,0.00017165283,0.0005260544,0.011470663,0.0022189438,0.0000073718693,1.8450685e-7,0.0000048420393,0.0025171645],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983174,0.00016772335,0.0003314594,0.00007371416,0.0009761052,0.00013359188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962169,0.0016064417,0.00043081722,0.00014864323,0.001522529,0.000074696676],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004799584,0.00005826388,0.00006570255,0.000091123125,0.0004463197,0.0012056003,0.001439551,0.00003545353,0.00069028116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009247792,0.00002927622,0.00006897324,0.00023264227,0.00017891974,0.002775607,0.000064289794,0.0007250585,0.000053741514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029945874,0.0002265307,0.0063853953,0.0000051639654,0.00027120535,0.000021381182,0.2058366,0.00039413178,0.017148983,0.28035387,0.13629347,0.3527638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094850366,0.000037802198,0.0014222098,0.00016045825,0.000022467577,0.00005743525,0.031083459,0.000021858497,0.0020023417,0.01025265,0.9547641,0.00008033209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078798743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002726991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89330155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082218205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009124151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209717632","doi":"10.5791/0882-2875-25.1.29","title":"The Do's and Don'ts for the Business Appraiser Giving Expert Witness Testimony","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Valuation Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expert witness; Witness; Cross-examination; Valuation (finance); Checklist; Law; Business valuation; Actuarial science; Business; Political science; Psychology; Accounting","score_opus":0.09732306573428133,"score_gpt":0.4209115077590345,"score_spread":0.3235884420247532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209717632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006835341,0.22974505,0.02311743,0.73252946,0.002154352,0.0031655952,0.000007277973,0.00010812728,0.008489148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54948604,0.38636437,0.0055721,0.025561914,0.0060240123,0.0061245766,0.0001655204,0.00011683809,0.020584669],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985141,0.0002819614,0.00036495496,0.00020334133,0.00042654265,0.00020910315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99454623,0.0025817147,0.0003137681,0.0002802381,0.0022456688,0.000032385182],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002965319,0.000120804856,0.00015318266,0.000035098055,0.0023270892,0.00060360023,0.0002605103,0.000050921633,0.00018400402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008596102,0.00007086096,0.00003730345,0.0017026002,0.00028648373,0.0006993847,0.000028652927,0.00010364988,0.000016846403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012037042,0.00013654734,0.0023987428,0.0007169337,0.00003134331,3.030133e-7,0.0018668025,0.0001082492,0.00003205247,0.3774215,0.22419138,0.3930841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012521644,0.0000016416406,0.05928383,0.00037994067,0.00005670726,0.0000019207175,0.0004348729,0.00012882239,0.0000012369701,0.0029640622,0.9365102,0.00011154742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033297108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008004718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71231884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046812325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074565207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209941638","doi":"","title":"The Ethical Identity of Sexual Assault Lawyers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Criminology; Criminal law; Scholarship; Political science; Criminal justice; Law; Sexual violence; Sexual assault; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.066693772560637,"score_gpt":0.39338224698878665,"score_spread":0.32668847442814963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209941638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16247924,0.00020375548,0.00021504443,0.24179697,0.002813546,0.00027806187,0.0000114912955,0.000111441484,0.5920904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98500204,0.000016814005,0.00039275974,0.003611529,0.00045053285,0.000012676666,0.0000042501033,0.000006200446,0.010503177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982393,0.0004640297,0.00022665125,0.00012505351,0.0007462074,0.00019876564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998265,0.00052249373,0.0001372627,0.0002347628,0.0006350122,0.00020543695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003967637,0.000057964167,0.00008315207,0.000021851352,0.0007205457,0.00032251637,0.00036171312,0.00019146859,0.00031484585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006272375,0.000046124103,0.00002584235,0.0004854981,0.0005041955,0.00090517185,0.000039896735,0.0008660717,0.00041237063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008805499,0.000034232155,0.0012226232,0.0000022899337,0.000010692172,4.6304638e-7,0.0037020533,0.000003228198,0.000054236396,0.9346883,0.059849937,0.00042312453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001391687,0.000023325581,0.0010377492,0.0000032485873,0.000011418498,5.579019e-7,0.013287992,0.000004097058,0.000055529996,0.019402912,0.96596676,0.00006722039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044080716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06937087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9152854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009535217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001314293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96228486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212337182","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1008","title":"Book Review: The First Women Lawyers: A Comparative Study of Gender, Law and the Legal Professions, by Mary Jane Mossman; The Ursula Franklin Reader: Pacifism as a Map, by Ursula M. Franklin","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.039906791484003924,"score_gpt":0.39661287441849274,"score_spread":0.3567060829344888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212337182","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03017383,0.052463345,0.0000044383437,0.8754574,0.0002451539,0.0012141047,0.00003391506,0.000012507221,0.0403953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83627456,0.0077576227,0.000006088177,0.15240528,0.0009039596,0.00002963461,0.0000033297524,0.000007863785,0.002611655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969886,0.0013780493,0.0006189488,0.00012978366,0.0006098689,0.00027474394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802065,0.0006559853,0.00077423494,0.00015518231,0.00029447756,0.00009949284],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00294765,0.00015454795,0.0004301619,0.000037149654,0.0026789815,0.00025946752,0.00037282665,0.0001054338,0.0000905171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019883063,0.00007991877,0.0000944859,0.00035304984,0.0012041546,0.00061801926,0.000039721257,0.0008067311,0.0000033027127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011768173,0.0003190934,0.000015657955,0.00001820752,0.00010248051,0.0000011896844,0.28511792,1.1240318e-7,0.0000069501148,0.20621319,0.5079044,0.00018308402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011492555,0.0001659886,0.00017793207,0.00005395019,0.00009326346,0.000008199939,0.12497334,0.0000014958042,0.0000033359986,0.0057125385,0.8675714,0.00008926328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01257952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056246074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8061007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008095544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046999776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215756687","doi":"","title":"Reopening Law's Gate: Public Interest Standing and Access to Justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Economic Justice; Political science; Legislature; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.21014143115358025,"score_gpt":0.42090159303027436,"score_spread":0.2107601618766941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215756687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34408265,0.00065132626,0.012876678,0.16539578,0.0020091655,0.000369261,0.0000025935851,0.000107897366,0.47450465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99538875,0.0006082857,0.0002782957,0.0014711657,0.00036120389,0.0000048766606,6.955342e-7,0.000009109441,0.0018776291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826837,0.0001707202,0.00018626689,0.00012552677,0.00017758831,0.0010715465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923414,0.00010345727,0.00013304233,0.000078387166,0.00027595408,0.00017502588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003144449,0.00006890993,0.00007616637,0.00013949943,0.0012299729,0.0009180799,0.00034419444,0.00004555851,0.000374156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001152911,0.00006569841,0.0000179839,0.0006098632,0.00007928063,0.0024665522,0.00005533045,0.0014000013,0.0000351079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014363849,0.000022808123,0.0009511942,0.0000017998008,0.000021211277,8.576732e-7,0.008432623,1.416006e-7,0.000018752564,0.98456526,0.0005840831,0.005386907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032951933,0.00016971093,0.0011811825,0.00003492663,0.00007616703,0.000117398915,0.118874654,0.000005486247,0.000053005093,0.29673973,0.5821378,0.0002804063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024346963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049513157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6878255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005581868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037327667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9678308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221584915","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1212","title":"Community Campaigns for the Right to Housing: Lessons from the R2H Coalition of Ontario","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Variety (cybernetics); Community organizing; Public administration; Political science; Work (physics); Public relations; Community organization; Affordable housing; Public housing; Sociology; Economic growth; Law; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.22800561846139725,"score_gpt":0.46652266542694615,"score_spread":0.2385170469655489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221584915","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3183259,0.00002808031,0.0004298398,0.6453961,0.00048581586,0.00017799578,0.0000462608,0.000004480342,0.035105508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886864,0.0000052178243,0.00017532325,0.008545428,0.0020217998,0.0000024207095,0.0000022174254,0.000002993856,0.0005582445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912715,0.0003620696,0.00019566939,0.000025422945,0.00019777364,0.00009188607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984619,0.00068075984,0.0002640041,0.0000642582,0.00046555794,0.00006351649],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019238268,0.000038161044,0.000098986544,0.00002355999,0.0015493901,0.00013227855,0.00019283884,0.00004697966,0.000023848412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006524717,0.00002286134,0.000053321055,0.00014155816,0.00023447369,0.0002482152,0.000018531933,0.0003138077,8.9706276e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002529141,0.000049007893,0.00013726036,8.9980836e-7,0.000024499876,5.656735e-8,0.3879555,0.0000013693369,0.000014581747,0.5894434,0.021905253,0.0004428981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020333749,0.00004209222,0.0027271148,0.0000061934925,0.000038363458,5.456923e-7,0.05878624,4.5177404e-7,0.000018844628,0.045189008,0.89295614,0.000031656928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7092051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5838965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8710509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022061398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002855722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215991120","doi":"","title":"Front Matter for In Search of the Ethical Lawyer: Stories from the Canadian Legal Profession","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Legal profession; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.033438627182023936,"score_gpt":0.39666951528482264,"score_spread":0.3632308881027987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215991120","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005174591,0.0014704545,0.00021675516,0.8784543,0.0060910485,0.00074640114,0.0001576429,0.0000035551968,0.107685216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60361177,0.0011776234,0.00002866396,0.003744217,0.0028585505,0.0000475307,0.000025324298,0.000024326566,0.388482],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651206,0.0011088959,0.0003441834,0.00015663411,0.0005263186,0.0013519224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816906,0.000817867,0.00029760489,0.00020962894,0.0004218848,0.00008394553],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053616767,0.000121419565,0.00017683982,0.00009898474,0.0016559421,0.00022628794,0.00079127966,0.00053841545,0.0040153274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006875603,0.00006338373,0.00010768105,0.000248162,0.00030648636,0.00024957774,0.000032215514,0.008734879,0.0005821121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005333243,0.00003250941,0.0023201616,0.000008200137,0.00009015638,1.8313044e-7,0.018985027,0.0000021983262,0.000015953045,0.3356448,0.6406118,0.0022356554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018336791,0.000018785877,0.00090445334,0.00010268638,0.000017591805,0.000002507424,0.014380966,5.448895e-7,0.00001168377,0.023267305,0.96101564,0.000094495255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73887885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9858829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87471014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033450446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097981736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216466673","doi":"","title":"Doing the Business: Judges, Academics, and Intellectuals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Nexus (standard); Context (archaeology); Law; Order (exchange); Independence (probability theory); Political science; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.0209703467139324,"score_gpt":0.3333821277257114,"score_spread":0.312411781011779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216466673","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32835522,0.0021384356,0.0034200295,0.58139753,0.0020109427,0.00022177768,9.307394e-7,0.00006306943,0.08239208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866042,0.0059518027,0.00024295814,0.001484503,0.0011933218,0.0000031817042,7.810579e-7,0.000007725501,0.0045115286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858713,0.00014990853,0.00015804524,0.000086998465,0.0001929976,0.00082490843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911344,0.00038186496,0.0001273058,0.000083958155,0.00023560986,0.000057797635],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049474775,0.00005919555,0.000058496757,0.000066919165,0.0013737158,0.00030670044,0.00025372754,0.0000907252,0.00029961523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026661365,0.00004191669,0.000020649011,0.00051058613,0.00021528019,0.0005690738,0.000021155138,0.004958321,0.00003632455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004142835,0.000013139252,0.0010076035,5.909233e-7,0.000019243016,1.175458e-7,0.007166608,4.2240035e-7,0.0002805662,0.9451767,0.0026782302,0.043652624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007145888,0.000008582885,0.00061898597,0.0000022927077,0.000011176085,0.00008322489,0.017579608,0.0000027339042,0.0000098285345,0.14398651,0.83756655,0.000059033937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011075544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015634743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83488834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015911087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006072303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217285498","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.902793","title":"Does the Public Understand Intellectual Property Law? Do Lawyers?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law; Property law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Property rights; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.028278343672201202,"score_gpt":0.31054464066210385,"score_spread":0.28226629698990263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217285498","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020157043,0.0009192918,0.0029609983,0.5699919,0.0014551817,0.00028014244,0.0000017377589,0.00008075878,0.404153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960515,0.00071315956,0.000025603867,0.0009831069,0.0011166539,0.0000049041587,0.0000018958156,0.000009934329,0.036629703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975929,0.00036658376,0.00021739806,0.00012431298,0.00039817372,0.0013005926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908143,0.0003323758,0.00014091583,0.00012845595,0.00025825988,0.00005855853],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003480075,0.00008720867,0.00007560998,0.0000689929,0.002325241,0.0009849315,0.00037158505,0.00006603002,0.0007261718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007032899,0.000037107984,0.00006099425,0.00057475443,0.00036339412,0.00092222454,0.000018216646,0.002099434,0.00009401367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007971508,0.00005821197,0.0001438343,5.546484e-7,0.000028814671,3.636034e-7,0.004846894,0.0000011657852,0.000010798956,0.9822238,0.007837102,0.004840482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009389054,0.000028815199,0.00001257996,0.0000020584685,0.000008909739,0.000023166509,0.06217762,0.0000025416698,0.000005856953,0.3272826,0.61029965,0.00006229082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075957924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15032214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011051135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0086505795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218153985","doi":"","title":"Special Section to Celebrate Twenty Years Of Publishing: Access to Justice And Law Reform # 2","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Yearbook; Privilege (computing); Public administration; Sociology; Library science","score_opus":0.03667479061876271,"score_gpt":0.36328099944020587,"score_spread":0.32660620882144314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218153985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44976178,0.000057876703,0.0010442088,0.12382391,0.0042727236,0.0002493528,0.0000028257896,0.000029846138,0.42075747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98277235,0.00063018955,0.000112065325,0.0023914918,0.009547166,0.0000042274955,0.000001876404,0.000008565433,0.004532068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985022,0.00010056767,0.00021123217,0.00011862746,0.00031900272,0.00074837083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992855,0.00005980557,0.00014789662,0.00007784183,0.00027204573,0.00015691346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024448608,0.000056413297,0.000083471576,0.00016568601,0.0004958149,0.000957242,0.00027337472,0.000063090905,0.00019905958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007105304,0.000058638267,0.0000249148,0.00095760147,0.000044568336,0.003089988,0.000038067486,0.0010927831,0.000016408265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068077614,0.00005752772,0.0005457007,0.0000029024566,0.000023918066,9.2305083e-7,0.008277118,0.000013149709,0.00007655387,0.9455877,0.010212468,0.035133984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017037384,0.00010279325,0.0030086564,0.000007856404,0.00003102819,0.0000334173,0.017457014,0.000001185533,0.000027279562,0.026245749,0.9528231,0.00009156219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012168562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10357121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9426106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010190327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026378396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218916827","doi":"","title":"The View From Here: Access to Justice and Community Legal Clinics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Injustice; Political science; Politics; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Sociology; Vision; Law; Criminology","score_opus":0.07850862130710287,"score_gpt":0.446330215674708,"score_spread":0.3678215943676051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218916827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69805956,0.008637991,0.0018735708,0.24563907,0.0033031786,0.00028338627,0.000004679139,0.000044775777,0.04215378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849459,0.008699301,0.000078849895,0.0031504908,0.001276146,0.000005242319,0.0000015863285,0.0000070735846,0.0018353929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972643,0.0011631991,0.0002106249,0.000055113473,0.00022637,0.0010803884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979327,0.0014369934,0.0001486375,0.00014974932,0.00016515337,0.00016679116],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009438561,0.00006508253,0.00007604899,0.000030348176,0.0044075064,0.00082570704,0.0004896896,0.000052558044,0.00006469017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025056687,0.00004870636,0.000026449532,0.0003482917,0.00010172344,0.0015906252,0.000063623615,0.0039739115,0.00005658536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024903999,0.00013051849,0.005622865,0.0000022221227,0.00005950235,1.0386148e-7,0.013034326,8.22101e-7,0.0000067152573,0.8839201,0.0036823216,0.09351562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009736763,0.000036423775,0.004613378,0.00000574195,0.00006444985,0.000011520328,0.06903541,0.0000012985264,0.00000206214,0.056095287,0.8699611,0.000075959906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00923419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042557415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86627877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003641784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037002875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220239534","doi":"","title":"Jumping on The Bandwagon: How Canadian Lawyers Can & Should Get Involved in the Emerging Trend to Implement Therapeutic Jurisprudence Practices in Canadian Courts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"bepress Legal Series","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bandwagon effect; Jurisprudence; Law; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.09767643661509175,"score_gpt":0.39108395724819367,"score_spread":0.29340752063310194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220239534","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22289287,0.00013122424,0.000001233973,0.72601026,0.00037105748,0.00055244187,0.00003759656,0.000016598611,0.049986716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842539,0.00003026308,0.000025122352,0.0136461435,0.00025353715,0.00019127205,0.000020377469,0.000011834773,0.001567558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775636,0.00056939665,0.00023621056,0.0002660221,0.0004459037,0.0007261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876976,0.0004790496,0.00017344681,0.0002924222,0.00008279149,0.00020254796],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019405806,0.00015297702,0.0001246964,0.00033480668,0.0012454311,0.0011906363,0.0005754221,0.0000789297,0.00024673736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006184264,0.00011283382,0.000031206928,0.0010857852,0.00012249804,0.0010919574,0.00001762119,0.00051298254,0.000006171897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041038445,0.0000807144,0.07664138,0.000009794343,0.000025169777,0.00004980177,0.14107783,0.00045456225,0.00006077458,0.73154163,0.047267243,0.0027500691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007453091,0.000019553589,0.05183489,0.000019289319,0.000008835987,0.0000012110162,0.05094791,0.000020736596,0.00004355109,0.0005512163,0.89632696,0.0001513361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8490597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068793976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029027057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220378460","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1656475","title":"Lawyers, Guns and Money: Lawyers and Power in Canadian Society","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.008150784164689498,"score_gpt":0.30577122849395727,"score_spread":0.29762044432926776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220378460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8372557,0.00045748544,0.0000138786545,0.12099898,0.00041899507,0.00006771358,0.0000021001129,0.000011450238,0.04077371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943853,0.0016131157,0.00012842534,0.0010788103,0.00015444521,0.0000020049604,0.0000010008936,0.0000060602206,0.0026308175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984798,0.000063100946,0.00011822706,0.00010131202,0.00013032305,0.0011072782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995319,0.00006644275,0.000058687318,0.000055724147,0.000065232736,0.00022199428],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024805951,0.000058780683,0.00006341396,0.00008710984,0.00065483374,0.00020931693,0.000095710035,0.00009700971,0.00015527474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026534556,0.00005866762,0.000021982973,0.0002734645,0.00015442405,0.00053208356,0.000007752779,0.0024263954,0.000006417867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029393939,0.000017341566,0.03370377,7.423046e-7,0.000020134637,8.648729e-7,0.013877112,2.7623705e-7,0.0001250595,0.9458409,0.0016124118,0.0047984216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000306517,0.00003353101,0.013882277,0.00000396682,0.000010150875,0.000067850015,0.04734608,0.000012323174,0.0000038709136,0.07426807,0.8639203,0.00014509028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48926607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98038745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87157285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004503096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011751039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220480832","doi":"","title":"The Long, Sometimes Winding, Road of Professional Discipline: Correspondent's Report from Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Public administration; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.014186483835323704,"score_gpt":0.35222339678858194,"score_spread":0.3380369129532582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220480832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9293231,0.002705329,0.00019912669,0.05426939,0.0053410176,0.00014324952,0.0000068736877,0.000010543189,0.008001416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96062887,0.00037060954,0.000023312487,0.000115637915,0.001132891,0.0000049932287,0.0000106920725,0.0000071801633,0.037705828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974186,0.00028913544,0.00035487217,0.00008323354,0.0006786131,0.0011755616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985726,0.0004109804,0.0005254052,0.00014070663,0.00023165041,0.000118646065],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004539836,0.0000737463,0.0000926218,0.000048984853,0.0014938698,0.00009349783,0.00031479838,0.00005120558,0.00034197868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014645125,0.000050594484,0.00004739569,0.00035788887,0.00011919377,0.0006321991,0.000029746257,0.0014960452,0.000009131594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013419072,0.00043389347,0.46135485,0.0000032284033,0.00039491898,0.0000086604605,0.017558634,0.0000061609308,0.00017921602,0.42993304,0.05742821,0.032564986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038966298,0.000041408715,0.26828265,0.000032288957,0.000078896584,0.00019458238,0.15880342,0.0000051049956,0.00016060313,0.060944602,0.51078945,0.00027730732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5689441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8986273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45336127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010457373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039529268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2221686015","doi":"","title":"Privatizing Our Public Civil Justice System","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Tribunal; Negotiation; Mediation; Economic Justice; Confidentiality; Law; Dispute resolution; Preference; Political science; Government (linguistics); Federal court; Business; Public administration; Supreme court; Economics","score_opus":0.02791887136536418,"score_gpt":0.333617440620791,"score_spread":0.3056985692554268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2221686015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05481114,0.002067878,0.021364149,0.31689313,0.00392651,0.00033692826,0.0000024616925,0.0003484593,0.60024935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849243,0.00022719624,0.00018119776,0.00026642057,0.0025321057,0.0000057934217,0.0000031908928,0.000012308427,0.0118474495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972494,0.00028565325,0.00029352886,0.00012555748,0.00042794042,0.0016179208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990638,0.00009522433,0.00027481033,0.000111823974,0.00036982965,0.00008454532],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042227334,0.00008565497,0.00009425897,0.00016199835,0.0016650996,0.0005830147,0.0002958667,0.00007686154,0.00004819308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006981242,0.000083344494,0.00007160614,0.00076280214,0.00003342881,0.0011317753,0.000014355618,0.0019355956,0.000133401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026476673,0.000044280747,0.0005081732,0.000006198361,0.000024047951,0.000001093214,0.0009640565,0.0000051367592,0.00003203642,0.9920314,0.0043545095,0.0020264247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035050532,0.000044589025,0.0006680559,0.000023813804,0.00012135096,0.00021670441,0.19842587,0.000032102475,0.000008207122,0.11561864,0.68424994,0.00024023284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038801352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027500972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020649966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012457828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224335529","doi":"","title":"‘Organizational’ Criminal Liability of Partnerships in Canada: Constitutional and Practical Impediments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Business; Criminal liability; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Criminal law; Economics","score_opus":0.07681580872395548,"score_gpt":0.3593067218906695,"score_spread":0.282490913166714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224335529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92092943,0.000010014457,0.00004871867,0.04126488,0.001185197,0.00009118216,0.0000072975467,0.0000047312537,0.036458574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979155,0.000008443214,0.001142627,0.0005999441,0.0003103545,0.0000018590047,0.0000029278715,0.0000023142675,0.00001604133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989368,0.00016129242,0.00027310374,0.00008493184,0.00039644775,0.00014743947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987862,0.00041097548,0.00015839728,0.000058989328,0.00045228665,0.00013315826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001097551,0.000050959723,0.00007949931,0.00004277393,0.0005019543,0.00009734462,0.0000698156,0.000047651178,0.00090214366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023835485,0.000050289706,0.000011727377,0.00020533756,0.00060717773,0.00052728795,0.00001706562,0.0007100066,0.000004121756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008935735,0.00007304999,0.0860856,0.0000037466586,0.0000060909965,0.000007278804,0.0007008204,7.3230285e-7,0.00008161195,0.9119985,0.00079304154,0.00024055695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011442993,0.000050222374,0.21655388,0.000033772805,0.000083859675,0.00064286607,0.15806444,0.000051259096,0.00061281986,0.0790249,0.54333794,0.00039972432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8738498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8329736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024254365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008603179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99701715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225766317","doi":"","title":"Thinking About Technology in Canadian Law Schools","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Project commissioning; Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Computer science; Publishing","score_opus":0.024808341477074957,"score_gpt":0.39287580240086106,"score_spread":0.3680674609237861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225766317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019712273,0.000017885046,0.0000441074,0.18277267,0.0002356619,0.00006687363,2.9754375e-7,0.00004923767,0.797101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98710996,0.000004964646,0.0014757969,0.0073200366,0.00007971158,0.0000031699756,0.0000011144933,0.0000023920895,0.0040028533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993852,0.000022630806,0.00011147355,0.00007323211,0.00011407932,0.00029343407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996383,0.000068194866,0.000025175741,0.00007606526,0.00008449717,0.000107766595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016701961,0.000028101811,0.00003483754,0.00031834506,0.00042365282,0.00012099676,0.0001608307,0.00010118752,0.0008950834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006794676,0.000029183024,0.0000070668652,0.0011939243,0.00007749733,0.00038632355,0.0000067809633,0.00030312777,0.00021475556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.32452e-7,0.000006866789,0.027875524,2.425084e-7,8.3077265e-7,0.0000020504333,0.0029277592,2.3509872e-7,0.00001107963,0.96590376,0.0015333248,0.0017380156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003317939,0.0000018759337,0.0062869573,0.0000033342324,5.73812e-7,4.0799924e-7,0.013664004,6.471063e-7,0.000053289237,0.05034783,0.92956585,0.00004207213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9753325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99805945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9673977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002841179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014669829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98005354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226220211","doi":"10.1017/s073112650001163x","title":"Canadian Constitutional Law: Presentation to the Annual Conference of International Association of Law Libraries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Citizenship; Common law; Gray (unit); Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.02529842659681522,"score_gpt":0.33620099547568516,"score_spread":0.3109025688788699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226220211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028573535,0.000025872067,0.0058518783,0.37726483,0.007147267,0.0005257668,0.00033564572,0.000017681918,0.58025753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944848,0.000021019081,0.0012026955,0.003104811,0.00044079576,0.000010697252,0.00007245623,0.000002541259,0.00066021597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976487,0.00012773032,0.0008497338,0.000050374158,0.0011871081,0.00013632783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98941755,0.00030226662,0.0012118613,0.00007618466,0.008870674,0.00012143811],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010329547,0.00007498288,0.00012094991,0.00036480188,0.00019775766,0.0007202772,0.0006477516,0.00008318325,0.0010331912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001810341,0.000064014916,0.00007534277,0.00025253382,0.0002662817,0.013838501,0.000036736077,0.0002520216,0.00008028744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002988351,0.000035376008,0.0016729378,0.0000029630344,0.00010314564,3.420334e-7,0.019835686,0.00042651,0.000048921163,0.9471923,0.029259384,0.0013925403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003089941,0.000038176997,0.004153502,0.00003920236,0.000015711845,0.000009672333,0.010078114,0.00010473804,0.0005039591,0.0059220195,0.9787494,0.00007648986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21261355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04177608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005150062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024152081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226222507","doi":"","title":"Ethical Advisor v. 2: A Web-based simulator for teaching ethical decision-making","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical decision; Computer science; Knowledge management; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0870687063557534,"score_gpt":0.4189295249234598,"score_spread":0.33186081856770644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226222507","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15670745,0.00024880102,0.0055627413,0.6680562,0.0055808844,0.0023264324,0.00002812335,0.000413876,0.16107552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607734,0.000059658592,0.0055229347,0.019589126,0.0007131151,0.00013193776,0.000029591458,0.000042872816,0.013137378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955898,0.0010563807,0.00079767726,0.0007132553,0.001146779,0.00069610326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928815,0.004960472,0.00095121586,0.00029969477,0.0005195931,0.00038756197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066119153,0.00029588662,0.00034774048,0.0003685616,0.0015991081,0.000506188,0.0003018384,0.0006873696,0.00076218584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004540426,0.00031926105,0.00007694992,0.0009976069,0.000289461,0.0003898755,0.00004053364,0.0048106387,0.000048180867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049179257,0.00039488252,0.026931081,0.00008099273,0.000012420323,0.0000021887072,0.0043796394,0.00010292982,0.000045170007,0.8705788,0.005272549,0.091707505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009343095,0.00030144682,0.069792435,0.00074405957,0.000023095827,0.0000011481767,0.00910867,0.0012780497,0.0000099743675,0.023650248,0.8936327,0.0005238372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016188009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007481267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8883602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010389757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004715608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228125395","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1311","title":"Does Community Legal Education Work? Educating English Language Students about Consumer Contracts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legal profession; Legal education; Legal service; Public relations; Legal advice; Legal research; Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.031500144782425334,"score_gpt":0.44243159157489337,"score_spread":0.410931446792468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228125395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8309021,0.00006275871,0.0000024507876,0.025890494,0.0020136924,0.000084780775,0.0000036445517,0.000013660242,0.14102642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781645,0.00004123181,0.00013012362,0.007775712,0.011498049,0.0000026089706,0.000002375949,0.0000074148707,0.0023780107],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998487,0.00060134433,0.00032953423,0.000056903085,0.00033117857,0.00019403711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806666,0.00027566042,0.00046827254,0.00007813628,0.0009848266,0.00012646402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016066586,0.000076938326,0.00015414157,0.00010691043,0.0019347965,0.00058797235,0.0002477724,0.00009420656,0.00010679888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017309064,0.000058157493,0.00005144309,0.00029261404,0.000554882,0.0009842166,0.000030173647,0.0006331912,0.000007935103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002664383,0.00046220227,0.0031693808,0.0000084748235,0.000049425707,5.071572e-7,0.610489,1.3767125e-8,0.000052430507,0.35892075,0.008481999,0.01833917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002870946,0.000037273152,0.02154233,0.000038328282,0.000035681758,0.0000024164713,0.18567745,3.327572e-8,0.00003940821,0.0020072577,0.79022896,0.00010377877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045766644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005391518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7817469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013999605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024286988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228252687","doi":"10.12968/bjhc.2015.21.7.346","title":"Foundation trust status: Not what it used to be","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Healthcare Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.17721548775882098,"score_gpt":0.4439050273611635,"score_spread":0.26668953960234254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228252687","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04532023,0.0004939238,0.0008140189,0.92479384,0.0037622324,0.0004895563,0.0000053876415,0.000026269936,0.02429451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9478577,0.0031891516,0.004300419,0.0386704,0.00074108434,0.000017003602,0.000013719454,0.000014673494,0.005195865],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979367,0.00032514514,0.000484524,0.000118915734,0.00084895804,0.00028573524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804455,0.00007222756,0.00032971374,0.00010227753,0.0009980686,0.00045319134],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026874675,0.00006235838,0.000130908,0.0001962273,0.00039172324,0.0012695633,0.00021238739,0.000042357235,0.00028798112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070130907,0.000078756326,0.000042659933,0.0005939171,0.000041194864,0.002210431,0.00003378632,0.00027334376,0.00007546494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061554885,0.00017447541,0.0005885869,0.00004507703,0.000050689574,0.00010290615,0.045299817,0.000036457463,0.0000012942907,0.06733342,0.21255761,0.67374814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003185579,0.0000780466,0.0021974556,0.00012466598,0.000013552493,0.000022217806,0.13067412,0.0000020649636,0.0000021454284,0.0007254721,0.86576736,0.00007431428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014055329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021978727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90253747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005882958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009823098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228757269","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-34111-8_12","title":"The Corporation as a Legally Created Site of Irresponsibility","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Shadow (psychology); Law; Prosperity; Political science; Legitimacy; Terrorism; Language change","score_opus":0.098542702198789,"score_gpt":0.41346706175295295,"score_spread":0.314924359554164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228757269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034012864,0.000063774954,0.00008714271,0.015682656,0.00049388,0.00034195688,0.000010067267,0.000050870414,0.9829295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03579618,0.00009005735,0.00022160393,0.00060653593,0.0001847253,0.000003836085,0.000040055587,0.00001089033,0.96304613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867576,0.000105745035,0.00041920214,0.00017070418,0.00049501186,0.0001335667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688786,0.001186151,0.0005135006,0.00030479455,0.0010436298,0.000064063905],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002694351,0.00010783347,0.00012915539,0.00010555185,0.00062251656,0.00018822699,0.0001656402,0.00025654442,0.004169514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018451562,0.000081147526,0.000074495954,0.00016440709,0.00046334448,0.00035265065,0.000019711502,0.0004034312,0.0004543873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005762316,0.000016830842,0.000026636635,0.000002478437,0.000019053608,8.625795e-7,0.0021621175,2.2391616e-7,0.000015693187,0.9829917,0.011568368,0.0031384034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047310456,0.00002398466,0.00019252376,0.000010393891,0.000022414384,7.4403414e-7,0.0006064783,0.0000017299209,0.000023855524,0.050893817,0.94808596,0.00009075834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012285871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032387324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9365176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012399966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002664676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229848406","doi":"10.1007/978-94-010-0808-2_4","title":"The Tradition of Legal Positivism in Modern Legal Thought","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law and philosophy library","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legal norm; Politics; Positivism; Legal positivism; Law; Political science; Legal formalism; Legal realism; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Legal profession; Philosophy; Comparative law; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.03419044022849431,"score_gpt":0.28291092112268845,"score_spread":0.24872048089419413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229848406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012211972,0.0008372762,0.0000043286104,0.07856218,0.0003194519,0.00018313447,0.000055071356,0.00003391856,0.91988254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64894736,0.0015610389,0.00009233739,0.0045888936,0.0019334874,0.000013847063,0.00013267624,0.00003901691,0.34269133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905485,0.00009009738,0.00029041502,0.00018387032,0.00024197518,0.00013878572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992344,0.0003099479,0.00019285441,0.00016472934,0.00003279004,0.0000652762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019481251,0.00014029168,0.0001693138,0.000077878474,0.00044859338,0.00027652894,0.0001830961,0.00020799955,0.00021189533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013904956,0.00011799872,0.00006678768,0.000100441095,0.00047220077,0.002027369,0.000026164646,0.0005412348,0.000008654849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026782047,0.000027437516,0.000012116804,0.000010955559,0.000016661052,0.00000808294,0.0007016698,3.5552034e-7,0.0000018011585,0.9955824,0.0016629557,0.0019487856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057320787,0.000013580211,0.000022496813,0.000038886956,0.000008191696,0.0000024061085,0.00003212143,0.0000021113344,0.0000038116543,0.484018,0.5157266,0.00007444579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011686244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003817871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6488253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017444378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042015206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48118484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229952705","doi":"","title":"Rights Protection Without Judicial Supremacy: A Review of the Canadian and British Models of Bills of Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Political science; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Law; Charter; Linguistic rights; Rights of Nature; Democracy; Bill of rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.048509770755257677,"score_gpt":0.362193090053361,"score_spread":0.3136833192981033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229952705","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003346522,0.9834261,0.000040613802,0.0018525347,0.00027371608,0.0009769949,0.000017896771,0.0000041581266,0.013374531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008224397,0.99042654,0.00002096378,0.000045702724,0.00025216912,0.000019134786,0.000004153254,0.000011021611,0.0009959071],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706787,0.0007539863,0.0008349173,0.00015267548,0.00048639937,0.0007041643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974891,0.000077265206,0.0015225342,0.0001738364,0.00063498964,0.000102255515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034686902,0.0001418889,0.0007470612,0.00020967757,0.0007286798,0.000057539608,0.00037288736,0.00019963797,0.000109055836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003836307,0.000103506594,0.00024734036,0.0012083361,0.0002853754,0.0003710458,0.000015489351,0.0020916015,0.0000012767604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004789526,0.000100565674,0.000013012201,0.0059441393,0.0003632106,9.203998e-7,0.0011018581,7.5982854e-7,2.1940387e-7,0.42593825,0.00079631543,0.565736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070806695,0.000034424476,0.000002333416,0.020850958,0.00037476534,0.00020471569,0.00007816571,9.443808e-7,2.977086e-7,0.14226076,0.8360208,0.00010097881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76071626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9511572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8352245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010320114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03952598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.965919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232358122","doi":"10.11575/prism/29197","title":"Lexis-Nexis Academic Search Canada - Part 2: Finding Canadian Legal Information","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Business; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09256621747561508,"score_gpt":0.4055931971805077,"score_spread":0.31302697970489257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232358122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15720212,0.000007908616,0.000005073843,0.06462774,0.00053537387,0.00023728066,0.000050091905,0.0000016365287,0.7773328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637984,0.000004419258,0.00046744588,0.0012069246,0.00030677777,0.000011753526,0.00013148443,0.0000034204668,0.03406938],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990085,0.000085767926,0.00021382968,0.00009109277,0.00029727785,0.000303527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942064,0.00009034132,0.0000764125,0.00009573692,0.00015078999,0.00016607047],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008516507,0.000054520944,0.00005871744,0.00010511351,0.0009293206,0.0008408728,0.0003638994,0.00007897653,0.007909122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029793757,0.000060575538,0.00001026216,0.0005531641,0.000050531813,0.0034518542,0.000026152607,0.00035239718,0.0005273818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009148809,0.000020210144,0.0085493615,0.0000034552063,0.000014274632,0.0000067671654,0.021347068,0.0001401663,0.000025450481,0.08952422,0.781154,0.0992059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064389635,0.0000027623353,0.0024636695,0.000005889019,0.0000031764498,0.0000010647622,0.007886134,0.000011006606,0.00011036878,0.00005424436,0.9893125,0.000084753716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99978936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8065963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006869677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023157569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99299777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233331656","doi":"","title":"A Better Understanding of How to Become a Lawyer in Canada: Regulations and Implementation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Law; Political science; Residence; Minor (academic); Legal profession; Legal education; Citizenship; Sociology","score_opus":0.03461954725349416,"score_gpt":0.3398930355755028,"score_spread":0.3052734883220087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233331656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73374295,0.000041313004,0.0015402235,0.26306292,0.000094048155,0.00016529286,0.0000011655666,0.0000027322008,0.0013493164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877304,0.00007346457,0.0001532479,0.0005113111,0.00006352795,0.000008422738,0.0000013170104,0.0000032773903,0.00041236865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990398,0.000082068414,0.0001429701,0.000058114554,0.0001733597,0.00050364714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996418,0.00008248584,0.000097107426,0.000037114918,0.0000891519,0.0000523352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080225203,0.00003587462,0.000055965076,0.000120018085,0.00022140649,0.000090996,0.000059393937,0.000016461227,0.00021251093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102700666,0.000035812955,0.0000096191025,0.00035932934,0.000020688,0.0005680751,0.000007073148,0.0003996991,0.0000017116531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027664007,0.000012506342,0.069016,0.0000018200657,0.000023029494,1.5178763e-7,0.00894977,0.0000062589074,0.0001617735,0.9115523,0.0026149089,0.00765871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000447054,0.000055377255,0.1319885,0.0000138821,0.000014740089,0.000012835738,0.45599365,0.000023745466,0.000026908363,0.39146996,0.019804982,0.00014836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.892024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52008235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029805514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010847344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235928116","doi":"","title":"The D ivide Within (Not Between) Liberal Arts and Professional Education","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections Canadian Journal of Music","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal arts education; Liberal education; The arts; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Sociology; Visual arts; Political science; Art; Higher education; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.03698551778382118,"score_gpt":0.3348344261495152,"score_spread":0.297848908365694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235928116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8254669,0.00013067332,0.00007361983,0.13015783,0.008047857,0.00012230173,0.000006293845,0.000008248646,0.035986293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855264,0.000003974203,0.00018294755,0.0010490913,0.0016511243,0.0000056074086,0.0000023255864,0.0000053513018,0.011573219],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991744,0.00014493558,0.00029917373,0.000063128544,0.00016113525,0.00015723646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987953,0.00026880403,0.00026079142,0.00006830368,0.00039427358,0.00021256975],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007948827,0.000053166237,0.00006268969,0.00024449732,0.0016345094,0.00032000104,0.00012787325,0.000050349627,0.00021440428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005323488,0.000042326905,0.000037581012,0.0003636636,0.00023930706,0.0006317045,0.000004421965,0.00040577384,0.000011439637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016733133,0.0000713321,0.039664943,0.0000048381294,0.0000578133,0.000005130961,0.04632808,0.000021891372,0.000077190685,0.28033784,0.60536987,0.028044313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009014538,0.0000261316,0.07369319,0.00004346587,0.000023772891,0.000047028727,0.028001042,0.0000024342514,0.000023337667,0.0098675275,0.88810706,0.000074850424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12854679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71676856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5882218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022469732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007953653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2236753730","doi":"","title":"Defining Moments for Women as Lawyers: Reflections on the Impact of Numerical Gender Equality","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.2360369209226907,"score_gpt":0.5452415023401602,"score_spread":0.30920458141746954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2236753730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0847665,0.000004315486,0.001050695,0.044054285,0.00011665295,0.00020768319,0.000008365304,0.000034492237,0.869757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875402,0.0000034870964,0.00076546584,0.0019621663,0.00011627947,0.000069367605,0.0000025662873,0.0000038399876,0.00953667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992721,0.00014278549,0.00015133363,0.00008544049,0.00017171734,0.00017660516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988814,0.0007195237,0.00009199903,0.00011039945,0.00013952146,0.00005713237],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010508008,0.00004491018,0.000060071772,0.000041058593,0.0004980631,0.00007132463,0.000103745435,0.000036007437,0.0038976741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013145246,0.000029374502,0.000054832002,0.00042193482,0.0000592298,0.0002886811,0.000007870167,0.00011450458,0.00012239453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015178493,0.00018384871,0.00048993836,0.0000010087026,0.000036304384,6.962638e-9,0.04185781,0.00007562246,0.000040300925,0.9406458,0.0153432,0.0013109817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026022346,0.00019375689,0.004917727,0.0000032988908,0.000009620945,4.5248396e-7,0.079221234,0.00013144614,0.00015827955,0.034701392,0.88026595,0.00013660273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048717363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020823948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9059444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030326552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006030601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238610639","doi":"","title":"The Changing Landscape of Canadian Legal Education","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Consumerism; Internationalization; Jurisdiction; Ranking (information retrieval); Control (management); Political science; Legal education; Cult; Higher education; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Business; Economics; Management; International trade","score_opus":0.014493483399624316,"score_gpt":0.31981797046611027,"score_spread":0.30532448706648596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238610639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15730473,0.0025744042,0.0002272252,0.31564546,0.00183474,0.00015034346,8.339324e-7,0.00001697437,0.5222453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96524405,0.0058778077,0.000018835959,0.00037196494,0.0006747668,0.0000035186033,0.0000015546728,0.000004253631,0.027803214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985464,0.00010596645,0.00013517422,0.000048072412,0.00017040811,0.0009939724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940765,0.000081381666,0.00011987315,0.00007021702,0.00023431463,0.00008654606],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002715771,0.00003742875,0.000039533752,0.0003728924,0.0014794997,0.00016417119,0.00018919373,0.00003283566,0.00013286294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041899222,0.000029444644,0.000029291941,0.001302854,0.00005063728,0.00041005292,0.00000390874,0.0008474819,0.000020466521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033893339,0.000015245223,0.0015154595,2.3880781e-7,0.000013092829,1.298942e-7,0.003290383,0.0000013355204,0.000005049954,0.9546992,0.0022445905,0.03821187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004250485,0.000013958325,0.0004146321,0.0000033072984,0.0000063840803,0.000041327974,0.082170695,0.0000034240484,0.0000029321282,0.03709823,0.8801663,0.00003633816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25626475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87803185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.917601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051493885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040445346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238677722","doi":"10.11575/prism/34073","title":"\"I'm from the government and I'm here to serve you\"","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02247029077137257,"score_gpt":0.2665325800596636,"score_spread":0.24406228928829105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238677722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63256484,0.000054848046,0.0071848216,0.2094782,0.00015047897,0.00014742323,0.000001500997,0.00001826222,0.15039961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94347274,0.0002162778,0.011235577,0.0025422531,0.00010419475,4.6376334e-7,0.0000048290854,0.0000047883946,0.042418886],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995095,0.00006865654,0.000040529645,0.00008561937,0.00021777271,0.00007791408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999609,0.00013719704,0.000047827813,0.000099139055,0.000041814932,0.000065033986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020607898,0.00003132981,0.00004673128,0.000010782374,0.0003926775,0.000029370509,0.00016140699,0.000033466236,0.00073683826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011025951,0.000031128056,0.000017393642,0.00018456287,0.00009100604,0.00026443438,0.000049756487,0.00009285288,0.000041002622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010365285,0.00017872779,0.06214112,0.000004532141,0.00007580136,0.000013852799,0.2749949,4.399628e-7,0.00019048766,0.08163974,0.12844951,0.45220724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103616476,0.00001015156,0.06028304,0.000004657734,0.000013387901,2.1116955e-7,0.021686831,0.00005397075,0.0000044603707,0.00087182166,0.91692406,0.00004380427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078842945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034116944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7884745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054799963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009703273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9272911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238753268","doi":"","title":"Uncivil advocacy: An intensifying spotlight on incivility in advocacy cannot be ignored [online]","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incivility; Context (archaeology); Reputation; Political science; Law; Public relations; Work (physics); Engineering","score_opus":0.07800053383653593,"score_gpt":0.31619037278018464,"score_spread":0.2381898389436487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238753268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86764723,0.000016521506,0.00003359456,0.005915023,0.0005256737,0.00017099289,0.00002928138,0.00008126113,0.12558044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952102,0.000006966823,0.00029423213,0.0003741774,0.0001208846,4.3088502e-7,0.00006872374,0.00001074553,0.003913683],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839526,0.00020176124,0.00023343123,0.00033588047,0.00056945893,0.00026422384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982773,0.00016021723,0.0002579864,0.0003460082,0.00066930905,0.00028919103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048504493,0.00013384425,0.00020776433,0.00023168902,0.00040276686,0.00019546038,0.00044168043,0.00012673864,0.00003467693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010411288,0.00017102277,0.00007320528,0.0008026578,0.00033658228,0.0030365228,0.00008975899,0.0003540437,0.000027410455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018842106,0.008459998,0.20257014,0.00011718019,0.00024215963,0.00088535756,0.6049225,0.0007370473,0.0013986765,0.045387045,0.07321757,0.060178164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011087754,0.00031404724,0.14598708,0.00009444858,0.000028323062,0.000012256892,0.4225145,0.00029323352,0.00009225247,0.001161172,0.4279112,0.0004827109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028335983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024069987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35469362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000545265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002230264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240623186","doi":"","title":"Lack of advancement of black and female lawyers in the spotlight : news","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"De Rebus","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Kingdom; Association (psychology); Professional association; Psychology","score_opus":0.16523324727033356,"score_gpt":0.4447777070400689,"score_spread":0.27954445976973535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240623186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8393046,0.00007902974,0.000035114506,0.04333094,0.00008048165,0.00010749431,0.000001432314,0.0000036717954,0.11705718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836254,0.00012198515,0.0003923132,0.00050159206,0.000033469834,0.0000028418526,7.6972685e-7,0.0000013213565,0.0005831861],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995574,0.00010206957,0.00010232241,0.00004010369,0.00013525673,0.00006284694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964327,0.00010290596,0.000071296105,0.000069508525,0.00008939101,0.000023611934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080533884,0.00002043919,0.000045482466,0.000027851365,0.000026552034,0.000013186957,0.000070887036,0.000021788175,0.00003441274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045958345,0.000015646727,0.0000075488715,0.0002788632,0.00010904433,0.0001287374,0.0000062928743,0.00005845596,0.000005245239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030621835,0.00021311858,0.075067475,0.00002429494,0.000009173192,0.0000014676955,0.47665763,0.000056333633,0.00016610108,0.42799294,0.008144007,0.011636832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018050491,0.000024524115,0.01389754,0.000008728483,0.000005094504,3.879526e-7,0.14298986,0.000010068801,0.00015437978,0.002001547,0.8406947,0.00003265065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006913941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039727446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8325507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026230835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031529446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241185470","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.2.299","title":"A Spotlight on Judicial Regulation in Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review","score_opus":0.1447894613108209,"score_gpt":0.46972922479564977,"score_spread":0.3249397634848289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241185470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06717857,0.0000025409481,0.00040974663,0.46284878,0.001592311,0.00015996996,0.0000015098904,0.0000748425,0.4677317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809487,0.0000041341295,0.00031536436,0.0063064,0.00069740333,0.000007321643,0.0000061327846,0.0000054425927,0.011709122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865514,0.0004779135,0.00016958284,0.00013140598,0.00039838662,0.00016754161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888635,0.0007157331,0.00007777466,0.000121226854,0.00014609973,0.00005280574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024879985,0.000055075394,0.00006712057,0.00011179734,0.00034427329,0.00015386954,0.00011311973,0.00023692645,0.00052093616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004883613,0.000057891728,0.000021534555,0.0005723624,0.00013160684,0.00047170333,0.000007237197,0.0011430369,0.00038567264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101055375,0.000042233052,0.0003643331,0.0000026098096,0.0000012518814,4.29427e-7,0.015296665,0.000034570097,0.000042767973,0.9789942,0.00432422,0.00088663585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011791392,0.00002236916,0.015311411,0.000017772069,0.0000029517867,2.4940334e-7,0.00061267486,0.00004443402,0.00008139256,0.042387165,0.94131976,0.00008190697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02311609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025691798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93699557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005446603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99208677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242208570","doi":"10.7202/1070369ar","title":"Teachers and the Law, 3rd Edition (MacKay, Sutherland, &amp; Pochini)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12569325266739348,"score_gpt":0.4154541026955374,"score_spread":0.2897608500281439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242208570","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097726054,0.00016878838,0.000086999346,0.85328454,0.0014093521,0.00033505083,0.0000026263958,0.00004921747,0.046937346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675673,0.00012010015,0.00020455032,0.027250007,0.0045625395,0.00008729189,0.00004419392,0.000009542799,0.00015444067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850285,0.00057074876,0.00027048518,0.00022208985,0.00026597074,0.00016784118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989358,0.0005303588,0.000120061406,0.00014256293,0.0001352555,0.00013595386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010230389,0.00009355187,0.000119153054,0.00005587384,0.0004413186,0.0002078022,0.00018320841,0.00011678152,0.00029766315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023972357,0.00007596507,0.0000336959,0.0005819397,0.0009171382,0.0006686733,0.000025227186,0.0005605208,0.00013983638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042768348,0.0001285069,0.00064365607,0.0000053136273,0.000005775373,1.0832092e-7,0.14284764,0.0000021970268,0.00001894067,0.84660584,0.0075139496,0.002185332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006121778,0.000018122473,0.0018587745,0.00001709388,0.00002218783,0.0000018770777,0.025347596,0.00002545327,0.00000573453,0.44827372,0.52365655,0.00016072157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028516157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000882552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8698413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084825566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005549712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43108088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242834126","doi":"","title":"Gender, Identity and Professionalism: A Review of the First Women Lawyers by Mary Jane Mossman","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Gender studies; Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Suffrage; Legal education; Distancing; Law; White (mutation); Political science; Mythology; Sociology; Politics; History; Art","score_opus":0.09938109716569403,"score_gpt":0.4560765653725017,"score_spread":0.35669546820680764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242834126","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010993167,0.9831825,0.000021705104,0.009211829,0.0005612093,0.0005155502,0.000010862425,0.000008737651,0.006476601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00004563445,0.9915127,0.000010039911,0.0012765708,0.0002541653,0.000031071293,0.000010752703,0.000017406543,0.0068416703],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966468,0.00066555775,0.00068098196,0.0001801841,0.00067581306,0.0011506322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807173,0.0002782418,0.0011252015,0.00020510654,0.00023274505,0.000086971944],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01014281,0.00018224346,0.0005597634,0.00010046151,0.0009843593,0.000104923536,0.0006296387,0.00019107467,0.00032455643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079363235,0.00012171443,0.00020685232,0.0010630627,0.00021754584,0.0006107339,0.00007222924,0.0037631504,0.000012897958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000396562,0.00012716123,0.000028101818,0.01388489,0.00032137646,7.698574e-7,0.002527438,8.702603e-9,6.4905635e-8,0.33670232,0.024955096,0.6214488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006143607,0.000013839655,0.000005245193,0.0082831085,0.00018550355,0.00007839999,0.0023279896,1.6504814e-8,1.8097351e-8,0.014973784,0.97394365,0.00012700066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055179844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016106421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94898856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017247134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020094907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243129715","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Therapeutic Jurisprudence: A Phenomenological Study of Toronto's Mental Health Court","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Society for Social Work and Research 17th Annual Conference: Social Work for a Just Society: Making Visible the Stakes and Stakeholders","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Therapeutic jurisprudence; Jurisprudence; Mental health; Mental health law; Law; Mental Health Act; Interpretative phenomenological analysis; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Psychiatry; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.2724717186400282,"score_gpt":0.4919627214988163,"score_spread":0.2194910028587881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243129715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8041422,0.0054904837,0.00036070944,0.1767897,0.0005161516,0.009563998,0.00042073068,0.00009047688,0.0026255413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956292,0.0014785307,0.00020595697,0.0002493562,0.00041808482,0.0005148906,0.000021476435,0.00003058829,0.0014519084],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589837,0.00075360294,0.0006589269,0.00044102073,0.0010653442,0.0011827343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952766,0.0019482145,0.00056588935,0.00020090285,0.0018376443,0.00017075168],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064976863,0.0002872182,0.0005477897,0.000028703016,0.017972963,0.0008598109,0.0006077584,0.00031381258,0.00012784779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030916178,0.00018744139,0.0007394273,0.0013920891,0.0032698486,0.0005338787,0.00014600984,0.00083657826,6.165733e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002519451,0.00044220075,0.0010469992,0.000077109806,0.00076810346,3.1986776e-8,0.8039592,0.0000018009902,0.000009379337,0.055197906,0.100155756,0.03808955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011041564,0.00091957994,0.010297272,0.000035263703,0.000063401974,1.3145127e-7,0.9388485,0.000041081435,5.6165794e-7,0.0074564717,0.041016433,0.00021715595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072100814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092608767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.191487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044434774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017981606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243732879","doi":"","title":"The High Price of Success: The Backlash Against Women Judges in Australia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Political science; Compromise; Blueprint; Politics; Legal profession; Public administration; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.025671593824668052,"score_gpt":0.278211033698592,"score_spread":0.25253943987392397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243732879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19602227,0.0003460173,0.0000043956,0.013688118,0.00093626353,0.0004929574,0.000017263581,0.000027283564,0.78846544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3864233,0.0010148516,0.00001852443,0.00007515052,0.00019661835,0.00000103747,0.000012013144,0.0000086421105,0.6122499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831676,0.00019174408,0.00038369518,0.00023597296,0.00061303016,0.00025876937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977752,0.0005408996,0.0010314836,0.00031599653,0.0002657471,0.00007068953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010674731,0.00015162866,0.00023723627,0.00013307517,0.0008345613,0.000047835056,0.0010616909,0.00044351732,0.00029357127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009903256,0.00013222912,0.00010454578,0.00023059828,0.0009704611,0.00045392005,0.00009667029,0.0012180391,0.000029324554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013352523,0.00012730168,0.015733534,0.0001245656,0.00029236643,0.000023111077,0.06406345,0.000105393905,0.0004071618,0.5433755,0.37393865,0.0016754433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020263552,0.000018776343,0.012057827,0.00010725266,0.00004800336,9.88724e-7,0.011187316,0.0000026579569,0.000026909098,0.0034035004,0.9727752,0.00016891342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007538992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010311877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59883654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006313729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007639018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245227172","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2022555","title":"Alberta MLA Compensation in Perspective and Recommendations for Changes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fraser Institute; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Compensation (psychology); Business; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.044666853419041586,"score_gpt":0.3989797047774688,"score_spread":0.3543128513584272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245227172","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037854463,0.0013109217,0.0021278227,0.92259765,0.00082087173,0.00040281678,0.0000029113912,0.000015990112,0.034866527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99290746,0.0015864676,0.00031306583,0.0005345412,0.0005498118,0.000021233147,0.00000504039,0.0000054097877,0.004076959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988678,0.00013743235,0.00010330873,0.00006357477,0.00008318057,0.0007447139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993138,0.00034464503,0.00009849793,0.00003558999,0.00015361127,0.000053876516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023847586,0.00004422628,0.00005529124,0.00012079777,0.00050533377,0.0000811431,0.000059527534,0.00004001428,0.00008603088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084847875,0.000044733668,0.000015306532,0.00024265112,0.0000402775,0.00072823436,0.0000055920204,0.0006481563,0.0000073187584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069504813,0.000049282637,0.002541172,5.7810706e-7,0.000011954905,6.9573938e-9,0.028450934,2.185194e-7,0.000011663697,0.96256244,0.0006912604,0.005673537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032961526,0.00005375713,0.002339011,0.0000061252263,0.0000168553,0.000015335745,0.20851405,0.000011103981,0.0000072430134,0.29573846,0.49287334,0.0000950986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01057212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19581695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95505303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009174199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015839823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99601656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245833277","doi":"","title":"Open Access to Outcomes of Publicly Funded Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Declaration; Free access; Political science; Permission; Relevance (law); Field (mathematics); Public relations; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.3965078419720008,"score_gpt":0.5874013646412969,"score_spread":0.1908935226692961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245833277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39776245,0.00013482616,0.00051008986,0.3662387,0.00045468926,0.0004404195,0.0000017641906,0.00002002007,0.23443702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666288,0.00071272335,0.00015372263,0.0008594163,0.0002022808,0.000014059792,0.0000010146595,0.0000075497696,0.031420413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970559,0.00047808094,0.00026340448,0.0001344083,0.0006890972,0.0013791176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821174,0.00034137187,0.0001436357,0.00017323243,0.0009814727,0.00014855215],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009948762,0.000055162574,0.00012640239,0.000349856,0.0014513516,0.0009075298,0.0020997436,0.000050438026,0.00062867143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003572074,0.00004871145,0.000040503455,0.0018667891,0.0001496153,0.003254779,0.0002560941,0.0019948406,0.000093687886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021400541,0.00012994159,0.066257305,6.917688e-7,0.000046153804,6.900674e-7,0.0052889297,0.0000017383286,0.000019501993,0.90444344,0.018739926,0.0050502717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003426011,0.00013625757,0.04645129,0.0000058739547,0.0000065580493,0.000035732766,0.027190862,6.996262e-7,0.000057954003,0.27096158,0.65468735,0.00012324203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035740573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077818595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6359474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082904147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022068972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245844754","doi":"","title":"Making and Breaking Rank: Some Thoughts on Recent Canadian Law School Surveys","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Accountability; Normative; Legal education; Humanism; Rank (graph theory); Diversity (politics); Political science; Law; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Sociology","score_opus":0.059443849659140305,"score_gpt":0.35460959886410776,"score_spread":0.29516574920496746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245844754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08177254,0.00041039375,0.00004528755,0.09001662,0.0027994285,0.0005345025,0.000028292663,0.00018697498,0.82420594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97386986,0.00030463614,0.00033859973,0.017237976,0.0024409406,0.00002535559,0.000017895596,0.000022531976,0.0057421764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976283,0.000769588,0.00028376613,0.00034550342,0.00040858105,0.00056427135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984124,0.0003266377,0.00013545452,0.0002959823,0.00023443135,0.00059512776],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024389978,0.00015988473,0.00016430297,0.00013923385,0.0020477083,0.000885429,0.0002619238,0.00016148464,0.0017989944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011778509,0.00016646144,0.000039275714,0.0007458137,0.00020866324,0.001560345,0.000026543443,0.0006354704,0.00064894184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013781322,0.000059824306,0.0069476254,0.000005659488,0.000023739572,0.000021501515,0.0018549708,0.000009340547,0.00002808113,0.9746909,0.00949981,0.006844768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024570434,0.000017930754,0.009423021,0.000046078767,0.000011748688,0.000006349531,0.0011346691,0.0000048273228,0.000027350769,0.007383849,0.98147446,0.00022399506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67074436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92199486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9719747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048718663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013088841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246454847","doi":"","title":"The Justice System and Social Inclusion in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Economic Justice; Social justice; Sociology; Criminology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.022778954480289843,"score_gpt":0.3444479922687626,"score_spread":0.3216690377884728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246454847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07053177,0.00003687964,0.000010513711,0.40230888,0.00037551497,0.00007598129,4.695686e-7,0.000011103062,0.5266489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952504,0.000011320974,0.000022330814,0.0029216565,0.00010288859,0.0000013023074,3.7699147e-7,6.096649e-7,0.0016891273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995782,0.0000815716,0.00007212856,0.000039351416,0.00014626412,0.00008252033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996366,0.00025067848,0.000026849748,0.000025698808,0.00004278309,0.000017380607],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047052454,0.000018635197,0.000023673561,0.000011332542,0.0019811576,0.00007629093,0.000068783425,0.000014777905,0.00002966035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018332448,0.000013294543,0.0000028825236,0.00019021738,0.000021436388,0.00013456529,0.000028562885,0.000078910045,0.000002457548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021602505,0.0000049139026,0.00024513944,0.0000028926518,5.454934e-7,4.2092873e-7,0.015648957,4.4200988e-7,0.0000061372325,0.9516036,0.015528039,0.016956747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007364403,0.0000033918432,0.015714183,0.0000032358105,0.000008292097,4.843011e-7,0.18575124,0.00007512611,0.0000034734944,0.0011578213,0.7971596,0.00004949648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9795222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9504458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003325396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019864724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247310989","doi":"","title":"Letter to the Editor: Diversity Missing","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tokenism; Diversity (politics); White (mutation); Political science; Gender studies; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.022567680265519408,"score_gpt":0.32126084665747334,"score_spread":0.2986931663919539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247310989","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006383831,0.00011575711,0.0006866058,0.9652417,0.019049874,0.0001534701,0.0000035999453,0.000029941282,0.014655245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017496827,0.0001788031,0.000059595797,0.728993,0.2364001,0.000003625092,0.000008150585,0.000016182714,0.03259089],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964105,0.00044227482,0.00020805724,0.00019023166,0.00081199553,0.0019369742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987588,0.00032433769,0.0002746368,0.00024113207,0.0003178913,0.000083191684],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043247165,0.00014892977,0.00012903835,0.00015169966,0.004509771,0.0006865549,0.0010074781,0.000791332,0.0004999366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009194904,0.0001127715,0.0001213859,0.00040057884,0.00013136317,0.0004896936,0.0001142591,0.039788112,0.00042211555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002565937,0.0000090290905,0.00003277192,0.000001141334,0.000043128377,0.0000028599534,0.0041892305,2.681604e-7,0.0000025388667,0.007724725,0.9842014,0.0037903804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005050701,0.000017965622,0.000013253585,0.000007376677,0.000042299675,0.000023841229,0.0014402578,1.9870825e-7,7.75567e-7,0.0247845,0.973467,0.00015201393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004450201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016100489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2362487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012235481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011418785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99678624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248818042","doi":"","title":"Dispute Resolution and Legal Education: A Bibliography","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Political science; Bibliography; Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Resolution (logic); Conflict resolution; Resource (disambiguation); Dispute mechanism; Law; Legal education; Public administration; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02397295467399001,"score_gpt":0.3812732769255093,"score_spread":0.35730032225151925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248818042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01576717,0.00020799045,0.00033129266,0.2625999,0.0003452228,0.00009042652,7.4498814e-7,0.00006679537,0.7205905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955115,0.00066228874,0.0072356607,0.005344288,0.000869942,0.000020392687,0.000004933712,0.0000033715569,0.030744126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999512,0.000059822396,0.00009388861,0.0000954217,0.00013386628,0.000104990366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996178,0.000061253515,0.000037392772,0.00007517702,0.00013198209,0.00007640617],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003370093,0.000035638324,0.000031951327,0.000925619,0.00046278574,0.00029286015,0.00005783166,0.0000349956,0.0009150826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011229142,0.000034546145,0.000016588883,0.0038822165,0.00010245346,0.0014324117,0.000008658237,0.000095783005,0.000079986006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016389326,0.00006666682,0.0015914622,8.521593e-7,0.0000027859012,3.34169e-8,0.0012092156,4.4925164e-7,0.000009331968,0.72790325,0.24603738,0.023176912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039545714,0.000004822898,0.008925775,0.00000218887,0.000004271005,0.0000014796265,0.0027682527,0.000015188566,0.0000072325092,0.00095514185,0.98722535,0.000050724593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006622091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040033385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9393478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017362452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048329003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249650766","doi":"","title":"La Commission du droit d’auteur du Canada : vingt années à « faire » l’histoire juridique","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Auteur theory; Commission; Humanities; Ethnology; Art; History; Law; Art history","score_opus":0.015876759819563515,"score_gpt":0.2740716894729142,"score_spread":0.2581949296533507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249650766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07682059,0.002291725,0.0026590102,0.34195337,0.0057385983,0.0004573353,0.000038556867,0.00011255672,0.5699283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7851246,0.0012924708,0.00068659,0.0016185534,0.00079567765,0.000038011643,0.000014532885,0.00004664718,0.21038292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967178,0.0009771688,0.0005188544,0.00049837254,0.00058454694,0.0007032346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964047,0.0012610862,0.0006220135,0.00075641146,0.00051723944,0.000438526],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017335189,0.00035656392,0.00035487223,0.00012301626,0.008360554,0.0008694347,0.001255111,0.00071277184,0.0032625836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010178126,0.00038759428,0.0001537821,0.00048264937,0.0031922976,0.0010141339,0.00017779626,0.0022339835,0.00013181246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009246119,0.00035608455,0.0031218654,0.00016362312,0.00011172976,0.00013104944,0.056104302,0.000031498705,0.00013090146,0.38149455,0.36542583,0.19283609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028527612,0.000059263053,0.00096542615,0.00014921738,0.00006694602,0.000077655495,0.011320878,0.0006391819,0.00058230973,0.0059246877,0.9794707,0.0004585081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7667768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60593766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.708304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028402419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012806998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2251680096","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.2.224","title":"Critical Indigenous Legal Theory Part 1: The Dialogue Within","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Feeling; Publishing; Consciousness; Law; Sociology; Project commissioning; Practice of law; Political science; Legal profession; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06063740446722613,"score_gpt":0.3302824035192133,"score_spread":0.26964499905198713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2251680096","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38763174,0.0010865318,0.00007193744,0.4088431,0.0034598035,0.00025744026,0.000023487139,0.000011040271,0.1986149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98482263,0.000029341658,0.000035580033,0.009751413,0.0008993684,0.0000093573535,0.0000013317783,0.000008154182,0.0044427933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982289,0.0008656038,0.0002865531,0.000076212695,0.00017696795,0.0003657762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975347,0.0010668464,0.00018305432,0.00014266552,0.00034513444,0.000727593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008461771,0.0000760902,0.00016236473,0.00007393695,0.00091519475,0.00064103695,0.00035687807,0.00006209164,0.00017090907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044080517,0.00004829592,0.00004717781,0.00025714617,0.0012330947,0.0006366147,0.000011559284,0.0005827462,0.000019308523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027843424,0.000008806249,0.0001415445,0.000001912712,0.000022989196,0.00001750078,0.24188314,0.0000040519044,1.8791395e-7,0.7549751,0.002539629,0.0003773249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031890816,0.00004122527,0.00011729779,0.000013349791,0.000019727191,0.000114865084,0.06943626,0.0000018957476,0.0000014352954,0.3704917,0.559378,0.00006528698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040013168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19239303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5971909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032866537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054756464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97135615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252636363","doi":"","title":"Response to the Consultation Paper of the Task Force on the Canadian Common Law Degree of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Canadian Association of Law Teachers/Canadian Law and Society Association","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Carleton University; McGill University; University of Victoria; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Task force; Association (psychology); Political science; Public law; Common law; Comparative law; Degree (music); Civil law (Civil law); Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.018014524385285058,"score_gpt":0.2655263977926403,"score_spread":0.24751187340735525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252636363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53117937,0.00012872882,0.000004266139,0.3799825,0.00039298768,0.00069941516,0.00021049565,0.0000035469125,0.087398686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98810506,0.00006812264,0.000010806234,0.009181245,0.000056549976,0.000007831229,0.0000054165143,0.000009435116,0.0025555224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661434,0.0012677647,0.00049281,0.00010401486,0.00080880814,0.0007122502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640626,0.0012209528,0.0009966635,0.00020813497,0.0010287247,0.00013927877],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070189615,0.00010746839,0.00018615564,0.00004695874,0.0034147885,0.000064975706,0.00038670312,0.00017886003,0.000029296989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015476508,0.00006948023,0.00011735903,0.0005060682,0.00043625713,0.00028546047,0.000012903302,0.0010513061,4.0522576e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021142316,0.000016596667,0.003028203,0.0000034532288,0.00013678978,4.7191914e-8,0.04170078,0.00008985082,0.0003827998,0.9448884,0.009674395,0.000057547797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015176501,0.0003618855,0.12067767,0.00016800573,0.00035134106,0.000016717848,0.15483634,0.00010230239,0.00470447,0.08139251,0.6353658,0.0005052991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8634959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068895253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04302308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253039580","doi":"","title":"Building on Strong Foundations: Rethinking Legal Education with A View to Improving Curricular Quality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Curriculum; Graduation (instrument); Context (archaeology); Foundation (evidence); Economic Justice; Engineering ethics; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Legal profession; Sociology; Identification (biology); Pedagogy; Law; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05973543340366949,"score_gpt":0.40556628563814556,"score_spread":0.34583085223447607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253039580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57579666,0.0011704036,0.20051081,0.061022237,0.0028749106,0.0013813598,0.0000025473746,0.0002571721,0.1569839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98824686,0.00013854241,0.0084547,0.0011126881,0.0006045985,0.00003116431,0.0000024463754,0.000016032362,0.0013929579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975114,0.00040085215,0.0003266294,0.00021526139,0.0004758482,0.0010700395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876386,0.00011358567,0.00033854248,0.0001741811,0.00047007596,0.00013974085],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051649967,0.00011809709,0.00011783271,0.00021428792,0.0014329752,0.000401549,0.00029154468,0.00006251552,0.00015551003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011212792,0.00010491632,0.000051369745,0.0006556118,0.000056888355,0.0014626343,0.000016425769,0.0019742216,0.00004448079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023596875,0.00013065033,0.0005715043,0.0000031467816,0.000028826127,2.8432015e-7,0.009038931,0.0000061097962,0.000047668902,0.9085351,0.00006054852,0.08155364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056922424,0.0007870595,0.0036693097,0.0002735922,0.00012947789,0.00012394988,0.099863306,0.00001826957,0.00014335073,0.6289185,0.26475215,0.0007518088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009977749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016560912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41245022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017275544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018831233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253580093","doi":"","title":"'...And the Learners Shall Inherit the Earth': Continuing Professional Development, Life Long Learning and Legal Ethics Education","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Lifelong learning; Engineering ethics; Legal ethics; Legal education; Resistance (ecology); Pedagogy; Political science; Learning society; Professional development; Continuing education; Professional ethics; Legal profession; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.0175674436311244,"score_gpt":0.3609743071289443,"score_spread":0.3434068634978199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253580093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7855894,0.0012389584,0.0002651036,0.20235097,0.0014483839,0.00021180602,9.478512e-8,0.00002286884,0.008872398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653211,0.0014445184,0.00015639041,0.0011923227,0.00066766713,0.000014745384,0.000001511239,0.000009053963,0.031192644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979513,0.0007153755,0.0002229086,0.00011961805,0.0003418665,0.00064891705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850255,0.0008506654,0.000244197,0.00006040994,0.00025455342,0.0000876444],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01078587,0.00008316863,0.000081872946,0.00005517295,0.0031420703,0.0006015867,0.00018222633,0.00011841604,0.000086985994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048821545,0.000051379553,0.000024764877,0.0002352855,0.00046274057,0.00058745133,0.00003784709,0.009235695,0.000009894045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027304533,0.000027690417,0.005640009,0.0000025145994,0.000033517983,1.3305232e-7,0.057080366,9.565157e-7,0.00005799752,0.89112115,0.00012522678,0.045883153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044233387,0.000016281148,0.00686611,0.000024556244,0.000023042445,0.00010990759,0.16971523,0.000018404571,0.000007640736,0.01970254,0.80294967,0.00012427298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085792335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0235214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8714186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082423285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019765293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254235657","doi":"","title":"Wigmore's Chart","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Dialectic; Premise; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Rhetoric; Humanities; Argument map; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04691223052577434,"score_gpt":0.3771612344128916,"score_spread":0.3302490038871173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254235657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043658175,0.000012087971,0.0000113061,0.027796097,0.00023304115,0.00006942308,0.0000015231724,0.00008078923,0.92813754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92176515,0.000058066744,0.00033952892,0.0091939755,0.00031740888,0.000010800806,0.000008697204,0.0000022565757,0.0683041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994842,0.000025868585,0.00011764465,0.00004850385,0.00015625176,0.00016754563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997222,0.00004661661,0.000033335236,0.00007800224,0.00006125218,0.000058640468],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003233491,0.000037924194,0.00003919101,0.000034336063,0.0004029652,0.00012599972,0.00012218113,0.000046694426,0.0329507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015430534,0.000034111355,0.00002085341,0.00031543837,0.00009151382,0.0011594362,0.0000053037074,0.00014152273,0.0047825514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001277504,0.000050724124,0.0012081536,0.0000021449698,0.000005695213,0.0000014972574,0.022620423,0.000018773251,0.000005841249,0.7827634,0.038894814,0.15441577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005194463,0.00001142124,0.0040833484,0.0000011736678,0.0000017250853,0.0000012992499,0.0014412164,0.000007632303,0.000008644813,0.0015043707,0.9928334,0.000053830558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086650084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020440244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020267244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025976362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99599236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254314256","doi":"","title":"Human Rights and the Model Rules of Professional Conduct: Intersection and Integration","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Legal ethics; Reservation of rights; Obligation; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.02465487964922645,"score_gpt":0.3731315263090802,"score_spread":0.34847664665985373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254314256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97628206,0.00006800915,0.0007918013,0.01612543,0.0003678575,0.00010059155,6.3585344e-7,0.0000067306014,0.0062569007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962409,0.00005523045,0.00012640661,0.0000708848,0.00017891845,0.000004202336,0.0000013494611,0.0000024466938,0.0033196404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992621,0.00013946451,0.00014764263,0.00006034321,0.00013588363,0.00025456704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951994,0.000085353924,0.00015954001,0.00004333357,0.00016405871,0.00002778241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024633915,0.000042128373,0.00005890852,0.00005937591,0.0010167264,0.000082042694,0.00007335618,0.000043116554,0.000040045295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018802602,0.00002573329,0.000016107446,0.00007595932,0.00034726138,0.0004983581,0.000009671238,0.0016271553,0.0000010159237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020013975,0.00002684648,0.000057471098,6.9815985e-7,0.000011568219,1.4973685e-8,0.007289487,5.778731e-7,0.0019658436,0.9886491,0.00013636945,0.0018420621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040569998,0.000037858834,0.00031344863,0.0000066031175,0.000015292057,0.000024412275,0.009547548,0.0002952512,0.00008912359,0.9864196,0.0028045636,0.000040582978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027575572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03952503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03676747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006596251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012369762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9780011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254591541","doi":"","title":"Cultural Projects and Structural Transformation in the Legal Profession","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Legal profession; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.034861002479335775,"score_gpt":0.3579469221606429,"score_spread":0.3230859196813071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254591541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79733545,0.00006704965,0.000009686212,0.029517582,0.00039461174,0.00042949765,0.0000016695957,0.000027352808,0.17221707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966866,0.000019128132,0.00023249247,0.0017357235,0.000102856175,0.000036768564,0.000007845629,0.0000031070147,0.0011755232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885875,0.00046979202,0.00015931229,0.000102825565,0.000238291,0.00017101581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963564,0.00009443771,0.0000573977,0.00008397105,0.00008066178,0.000047904443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087517535,0.000064002794,0.000058398047,0.000034638506,0.00072535133,0.00036457545,0.00010552207,0.00006321077,0.00017523408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044900712,0.000042337553,0.000016595233,0.00042601582,0.000112864516,0.0021263005,0.0000038748053,0.00035966028,0.00002541131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005489984,0.000016324771,0.001419051,0.0000063286793,0.0000018452234,5.5934277e-7,0.061227843,0.0000012516011,0.00008439383,0.9355525,0.0010973824,0.0005870822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035693322,0.00002103332,0.00857568,0.000018830842,0.0000070726887,0.000008586508,0.12055343,0.000015627938,0.00018718418,0.0046248594,0.8655025,0.00012827532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007871457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014586048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9309276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052912077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029823827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254725190","doi":"10.14288/1.0064477","title":"Ethical issues and codes of ethics : views of adult education practitioners in British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical code; Information ethics; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Engineering","score_opus":0.02874924684879856,"score_gpt":0.3188645478042763,"score_spread":0.2901153009554778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254725190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728598,0.00019349316,0.000030386345,0.017154986,0.00013614543,0.0002442279,0.000056868055,0.000018154487,0.009305959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942798,0.0017624235,0.0014993913,0.0006199463,0.00003149954,6.941055e-7,0.00002199766,0.0000038196868,0.0017804189],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998697,0.00038435258,0.00023215631,0.00020046784,0.00035186234,0.00013416038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981152,0.00028612372,0.0003377567,0.00012294631,0.0010596348,0.000078343954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010420613,0.00002444307,0.00021949451,0.0000523029,0.0003365457,0.00021050297,0.00017308582,0.00030784638,0.00025966635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017681583,0.000107247986,0.000045443587,0.0006877316,0.00065044314,0.00075892993,0.000021941936,0.0005791931,0.000001916067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015862563,0.0014904025,0.10120487,0.00024863268,0.00003522754,0.000012949371,0.04195801,0.0000027241738,0.00039243573,0.0018769446,0.055583153,0.7971788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029520175,0.00006012649,0.9325753,0.0003160178,0.000021974964,0.000009054041,0.048784282,0.0000058578853,9.64252e-7,0.0035213295,0.014306409,0.00010349346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9393504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98982584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8313704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006955337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013850377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4373446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255536214","doi":"","title":"How Do You Trim the Seamless Web? Considering the Unintended Consequences of Pedagogical Alterations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Socratic method; Perspective (graphical); Demise; Epistemology; Foundation (evidence); Unintended consequences; Value (mathematics); Bridge (graph theory); Legal education; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.1250992046409846,"score_gpt":0.3892139588782486,"score_spread":0.26411475423726405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255536214","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21262869,0.0015832923,0.0012902503,0.7643846,0.0005624679,0.000252838,0.0000038092403,0.000029436822,0.01926462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987092,0.0036114,0.000052583066,0.00052171457,0.0003936185,0.000009550557,0.0000010878285,0.000005534993,0.008312464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979115,0.0005883934,0.00022244982,0.00010388858,0.00041231705,0.0007614499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856764,0.0005115654,0.00027830657,0.00015025273,0.00043773305,0.000054512344],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028745,0.000082556624,0.00010870315,0.00006450552,0.002541722,0.00030986062,0.00038795464,0.000053077507,0.00013398747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015493574,0.00004666691,0.00008394099,0.00052845146,0.0016805243,0.0005261594,0.000017779277,0.0018941294,0.000007599048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008717784,0.00003319,0.00058978365,6.6067145e-7,0.000048962516,0.0000012174839,0.015150578,0.000009898893,0.000349001,0.9819828,0.0009162922,0.0009088717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034178776,0.00009153556,0.00026146797,0.000011694961,0.00004745929,0.00076068053,0.37758026,0.00002054058,0.0002618473,0.22946036,0.3910236,0.00013878521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007374153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004555972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77446336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025285743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016900377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255701417","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195385717.003.0012","title":"Who Do You Think You Are? When Should the Law Let You Be Who You Want to Be?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; State (computer science); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.10970370549240684,"score_gpt":0.36664935485755623,"score_spread":0.2569456493651494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255701417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020797908,0.00015667811,0.00003911786,0.44158325,0.0010015813,0.0006007401,0.000096943455,0.00014823237,0.5563527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021334307,0.0003676566,0.0005444029,0.11688513,0.0020791923,0.00003439768,0.00008641385,0.000064504056,0.8778049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960588,0.00019622638,0.0007159086,0.000797624,0.0015658855,0.00066550495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665856,0.00043689023,0.00059067796,0.0011167921,0.0008224504,0.00037464986],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021209186,0.00054712786,0.00056865247,0.00024895923,0.001990837,0.0016245081,0.001348918,0.0007818167,0.016383179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072926155,0.0004065362,0.00028483765,0.00032926028,0.00056549493,0.0010710345,0.00016662345,0.0017889398,0.0009297289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009793199,0.00003419561,0.0000074300738,0.0000042117367,0.000047908812,0.0000034821262,0.033305448,0.000001276647,0.0000012619632,0.6151887,0.3474439,0.003952364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012783219,0.00005212918,0.0000392068,0.00007266613,0.000110014844,0.000003692785,0.013054924,0.0000019377478,0.000008061392,0.0627838,0.9231843,0.0005614714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014881385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027064584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57574034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003480683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012385681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255827228","doi":"10.5623/cig2012-008","title":"Survey Law Education Through Distance Learning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Distance education; Presentation (obstetrics); Professional development; Legal education; Public relations; Obligation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine","score_opus":0.07070038039987028,"score_gpt":0.4153305149780924,"score_spread":0.3446301345782221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255827228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025718315,0.00023242061,0.0021916416,0.014503839,0.0014505588,0.00014775488,0.0000026937537,0.00009620282,0.9556566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850452,0.000019189809,0.0015698199,0.0014244342,0.00040463902,0.000022342669,0.000032821637,0.0000059824456,0.011475569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899036,0.00038107648,0.00013790427,0.00007117478,0.00019248867,0.00022699194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991508,0.00041275952,0.00009353446,0.00011336833,0.00015456724,0.00007493276],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012355462,0.000048184243,0.000058108537,0.00001747817,0.0007208552,0.00013811306,0.00009928555,0.000043231797,0.001306079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018952305,0.000048892383,0.000016318627,0.00039348606,0.000112873866,0.0013702787,0.000010759159,0.0001739957,0.0007561664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012328903,0.000119111864,0.02084936,0.000004747324,0.0000040392365,1.48353e-8,0.029516878,8.724679e-7,0.0000037521304,0.9347805,0.01214706,0.002572454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024517676,0.00000315619,0.034725584,0.000006787725,0.000004882363,2.722387e-7,0.0076826746,0.0000038075168,0.000009075714,0.0038602771,0.9536082,0.000070730086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01479821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031475204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95932686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006668542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043700382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256341160","doi":"","title":"Lawyers as Gatekeepers, Investors and Advisors: An Analysis of Innovation in Legal Fee Arrangements (and Implications for the Lawyer-Client Relationship and the Public Interest)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Club deal; Business; Private equity firm; Equity (law); Private equity fund; Private investment in public equity; Equity theory; Gatekeeping; Public interest; Equity risk; Common law; Finance; Private equity; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06695489875305932,"score_gpt":0.3829592288317536,"score_spread":0.3160043300786943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256341160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80110544,0.00054174534,0.0012580992,0.19580533,0.00006413269,0.00029877978,0.0000024979395,0.0000069352477,0.0009170226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965473,0.0022269604,0.000057924823,0.00062622986,0.000066912995,0.00004268642,0.000011209664,0.000005753372,0.0004150362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858236,0.0003091184,0.00039495408,0.00013630683,0.00013951922,0.00043774772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845344,0.00072329806,0.0003384321,0.0001270018,0.00030946787,0.000048366892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005701731,0.00007290854,0.00011928596,0.0004444726,0.0009554783,0.0002918429,0.00016430487,0.000052595708,0.000015127437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020289666,0.000050770057,0.000030415133,0.0022778837,0.0003898334,0.00094787864,0.000018143137,0.00068711024,4.387097e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003158575,0.00003483309,0.08961032,0.0000010451836,0.00013503352,2.552184e-8,0.0048480895,0.000007205808,0.000012001564,0.9011559,0.000035954134,0.004127991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018350126,0.00015952851,0.31351766,0.000012348254,0.00055448536,0.000036699184,0.11819937,0.00054266345,0.0000025536049,0.44598532,0.118964545,0.00018981264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029824192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07685861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4551706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024018875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013740938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9399863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256453411","doi":"","title":"The Principles and Practices of Aboriginal Equity Programs in Canadian Law Schools: A Comparative Study of the Saskatchewan College of Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Political science; Law; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.07949494560792002,"score_gpt":0.43674367797811825,"score_spread":0.3572487323701982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256453411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587114,0.00030740513,0.000001047868,0.020542815,0.00007638239,0.00045633985,0.0000045661645,0.0000024752326,0.019897588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994353,0.00015289884,0.000029641446,0.00007418748,0.000045133198,0.0000052468636,3.1192482e-7,0.000002132436,0.00025511836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803436,0.0005436693,0.00035601843,0.00008167082,0.00035379172,0.0006304937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984198,0.00020561203,0.00085006317,0.00012030629,0.0003334077,0.00007077734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047776406,0.0000630325,0.00014027735,0.00005125938,0.0007179261,0.00007011137,0.00034174355,0.000037705533,0.0000044780677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027129936,0.000040306044,0.000027091884,0.00059622555,0.00030173166,0.00046805653,0.000013024884,0.0012118518,2.549981e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003538489,0.00030659634,0.013734655,0.0000017350934,0.000040222512,2.2299396e-7,0.03461752,0.000004318939,0.000025087118,0.9504864,0.00001154206,0.0007363084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005700276,0.00071705715,0.020354047,0.000034556604,0.000046714224,0.000013356155,0.78931755,0.000008635788,0.000059673555,0.090012066,0.09878233,0.000084015766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7444751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86047435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004878802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020988688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9845614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257108286","doi":"","title":"Didaktische Zugänge zur Rechtslehre in Nordamerika (Law Teaching and Legal Education Discourse in the USA and Canada)","year":2011,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; German; Scholarship; Excellence; Discipline; Law; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Object (grammar); Political science; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02410073950057298,"score_gpt":0.3309596738199862,"score_spread":0.30685893431941325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257108286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8832332,0.00580813,0.00003668299,0.07606698,0.001207925,0.00028697168,0.0000035856135,0.0000039285414,0.033352587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99050736,0.004736137,0.000110805115,0.0019343207,0.00063479115,0.000015436259,0.0000042900665,0.000012782448,0.0020441015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963369,0.0012839444,0.00042968796,0.00024681052,0.0004167248,0.0012859813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904597,0.00029468324,0.00031204056,0.00015408179,0.00008169827,0.000111543406],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006761869,0.00017545454,0.00017433053,0.00015719219,0.0011437999,0.00040696128,0.00033218265,0.00010728933,0.00007416431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006072781,0.00014225139,0.000027272523,0.0004371589,0.0002709586,0.0014575074,0.00003014216,0.0064144973,0.0000056613535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027867507,0.00025607442,0.034996938,0.0000059575623,0.000036102105,0.0000053263584,0.031736225,3.8624344e-7,0.000008437585,0.8978511,0.00050627074,0.034569297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006544537,0.00023056871,0.070924826,0.00012494881,0.0001291912,0.0003390946,0.5035487,0.000019957553,0.0000051412762,0.06992438,0.35361022,0.0004885262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9620483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82792675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011064236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029696446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99587774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257582217","doi":"","title":"Spaces and Challenges: Feminism in Legal Academia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Legal education; Gender studies; Economic Justice; Political science; Women's history; Sociology; Law; Empowerment; Affirmative action; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.2464361124416393,"score_gpt":0.3942612252996772,"score_spread":0.14782511285803793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257582217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043093696,0.00028442225,0.00000478986,0.085835025,0.0001399661,0.000053724252,1.7624859e-7,0.000026201746,0.870562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883858,0.001777973,0.0006934973,0.00096721295,0.00007901885,0.000007430628,2.476287e-7,0.0000022571187,0.008086584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999571,0.00006300995,0.000084249245,0.00008713367,0.000087106084,0.000107456384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997542,0.000092405215,0.000030477022,0.000046751153,0.000028424032,0.000047773636],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005566233,0.000032172757,0.000041424875,0.000060605395,0.000110311645,0.00004899569,0.00006835219,0.000112013,0.0010099827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002502193,0.00002963627,0.0000061248747,0.00017101453,0.000092036775,0.00065316615,0.00001143867,0.00027873926,0.000052398114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015871033,0.000022755437,0.0022649297,0.0000018937276,0.0000013244819,5.6056695e-7,0.102809764,6.770035e-9,0.0000029885973,0.88672256,0.0009294953,0.007242158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060772476,0.000007842934,0.031440936,0.0000034666098,0.0000015110336,6.0371093e-7,0.08465739,0.0000010672671,0.000025202291,0.00547369,0.8782748,0.000052697033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0119933225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0114353355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94529206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017017837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018639486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257729547","doi":"","title":"Book Review of Richard K. Sherwin, When Law Goes Pop","year":2006,"lang":"lt","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Postmodernism; Skepticism; Criminal law; Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01403097763700005,"score_gpt":0.322241075731255,"score_spread":0.3082100980942549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257729547","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016370197,0.6396347,0.00020910068,0.2063118,0.0008390666,0.00024327291,0.0000074074646,0.00002118246,0.15256976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046140768,0.7272419,0.00012753536,0.040078122,0.0027022208,0.000011068897,0.000019756018,0.00003688934,0.18364178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956205,0.000598332,0.00092584017,0.00022772464,0.0007544568,0.0018731393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976828,0.00020174027,0.0010107731,0.00024067191,0.0007567667,0.00010725622],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051840306,0.00020569847,0.00037247385,0.00011380514,0.0008056721,0.00020360535,0.0005320462,0.00014716062,0.0069581326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044002302,0.00019060839,0.00024166037,0.00075135287,0.00027314937,0.0014351904,0.000030149782,0.0032687727,0.00027614096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008521596,0.00016483365,0.00005538194,0.00015557244,0.00008442734,0.0000010542773,0.0007256496,7.4427055e-7,0.000024273753,0.62628007,0.37035894,0.0021405134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020555331,0.00011165449,0.0000350385,0.00073422946,0.00015404551,0.00006953888,0.0021460825,0.0000011894434,0.000027638765,0.12408015,0.87225103,0.00018383093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011322583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068568024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50219995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011930007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01303082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258055179","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000237x","title":"Should Any Court Accept the “Social Authority” Paradigm?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Resolution (logic); Law; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Computer security","score_opus":0.1076789380825444,"score_gpt":0.4200297274548881,"score_spread":0.3123507893723437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258055179","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040056188,0.0006027488,0.00033816058,0.7140983,0.0029246712,0.00017823123,0.000011503687,0.000016864124,0.24177335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898931,0.000098927456,0.00013139719,0.0058634924,0.0016572702,0.0000029940588,7.603317e-7,0.0000085621095,0.0023435454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998388,0.00029105475,0.00035371838,0.000101022306,0.00045738247,0.00040881758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983046,0.00024415588,0.00031301277,0.00014162928,0.00045919864,0.00053741876],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001876329,0.00009103568,0.00013800053,0.000106560576,0.0023788605,0.00062601804,0.000733842,0.00011307494,0.001848067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082136807,0.00007427269,0.00008854922,0.00069850247,0.00064290577,0.001130051,0.0000082712795,0.000752394,0.000069172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067839865,0.000020249767,0.0031934185,0.0000017808699,0.00002282808,0.00007153418,0.029404921,0.000005832423,0.000007320285,0.8781106,0.086687244,0.0024675217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008276517,0.000019986344,0.007639349,0.000014849204,0.000028939756,0.00006254151,0.004783498,0.0000028737288,0.000006750944,0.0068534636,0.98040974,0.00009521783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103312194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33583596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94983685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031197834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006491252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258489002","doi":"","title":"Beyond \"Thinking Like a Lawyer\" and the Traditional Legal Paradigm: Toward a Comprehensive View of Legal Education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Engineering ethics; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Legal formalism; Legal profession; Legal research; Political science; Legal ethics; Legal writing; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Black letter law; Engineering; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03490787322344787,"score_gpt":0.2702237689408482,"score_spread":0.23531589571740033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258489002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4775711,0.0004679508,0.000496418,0.16919222,0.00038533306,0.00042720712,0.000104801824,0.00004979931,0.35130516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997969,0.0000765917,0.00024062287,0.00091371464,0.00006149533,4.47186e-7,0.000051461946,0.0000029603495,0.00068376074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991788,0.00012824652,0.00014396179,0.0001266238,0.00030452383,0.00011783131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897796,0.00038802033,0.00020112825,0.00013144326,0.00022717104,0.00007426408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002117628,0.00008062618,0.00017394825,0.00010208391,0.00061499694,0.00019191862,0.00028927246,0.000054006094,0.000092844726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009112745,0.000083254476,0.00008692864,0.00043265292,0.00078101945,0.0021062081,0.00003651719,0.00019473367,0.000008470965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006654248,0.0002451583,0.00049245264,0.000009820488,0.000030987947,0.0000018833274,0.019125767,0.0000024514438,0.0000046447617,0.964529,0.007216366,0.008274924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009665632,0.00009869836,0.028458828,0.00004981832,0.00007768702,0.000027377626,0.046485826,0.000059100203,0.000004423419,0.074254505,0.8493286,0.00018858013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038901847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090859167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89027447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051795076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065157015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58808213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258736271","doi":"","title":"Transsystemia - Are We Approaching a New Langdellian Moment - Is McGill Leading the Way","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Common law; Jurisdiction; Commercial law; Legal history; Sociology","score_opus":0.10412803839665143,"score_gpt":0.3977357728599319,"score_spread":0.2936077344632805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258736271","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013336123,0.0075554624,0.0009205386,0.5209055,0.0007087178,0.0005084828,0.00008045439,0.000057317095,0.46913016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66771966,0.057869483,0.0015719807,0.05107837,0.0019152729,0.00024280982,0.0001764658,0.000053462474,0.21937247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985537,0.00019086814,0.00038737408,0.00018664317,0.00049910677,0.00018231355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916863,0.0001691726,0.0002762939,0.00015030363,0.00017234411,0.000063232255],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010055592,0.00010337727,0.00015282269,0.00003527968,0.00054911163,0.00021724513,0.00039498348,0.000028241915,0.0014234432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007062404,0.000076542616,0.0000925291,0.0002885147,0.000063793166,0.00055103743,0.000019200023,0.00024241756,0.00035548385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002197478,0.00003969702,0.00005616661,0.00012872637,0.000029595767,0.0000015051927,0.0017661211,0.000012011828,0.000007758162,0.8945683,0.09608137,0.007306516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007138208,0.0000028903185,0.00003814249,0.0006677486,0.000023747021,0.000003524674,0.0003828382,0.00001677229,0.000014857906,0.005371458,0.993309,0.00009760312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024288978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062297685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89722764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020109274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013511477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258869515","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of Lawyers’ Roles in Mandatory Mediation: A Condition of Systemic Transformation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; Law; Alternative dispute resolution; Sociology","score_opus":0.008107850712365708,"score_gpt":0.3094558521701075,"score_spread":0.3013480014577418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258869515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92377394,0.005179935,0.009499927,0.0453287,0.00043889097,0.00035487095,0.000005105553,0.000018133493,0.015400514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670017,0.0028546588,0.000016258808,0.000022693175,0.00017913467,0.0000060136667,0.0000032372654,0.0000026027499,0.00021524182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986973,0.00024608424,0.00036977272,0.000041620173,0.0002831433,0.00036208075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992228,0.00014433352,0.00034006336,0.00005194355,0.00022125352,0.000019584702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039649005,0.000037608766,0.00006713057,0.00012393796,0.00029083344,0.00002758306,0.000120293735,0.000049510556,0.000028007402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022851133,0.000030847,0.00003318408,0.000365828,0.000085643755,0.0008562129,0.0000021332387,0.00058460596,0.0000058835403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019959529,0.000035912086,0.0010183417,0.000004299018,0.00001502667,1.8934713e-8,0.016163932,0.00013512987,0.00035422677,0.97094834,0.000057308072,0.011247504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017144434,0.00019690252,0.008360207,0.00014817009,0.000059821818,0.00007452013,0.6574836,0.00056954275,0.0005669645,0.27792177,0.05268512,0.00021893783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008271495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033759743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6930266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014859681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054243943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98387164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259290332","doi":"","title":"First Principles: The Melbourne Law School 1857-2007","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Privilege (computing); Legal education; Political science; Jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Curriculum; Legal history; Common law; Corporate governance; Sociology; Management","score_opus":0.04001530267842498,"score_gpt":0.3328350652182197,"score_spread":0.29281976253979475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259290332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0623556,0.0028374004,0.0022363286,0.38333467,0.0021391974,0.00040603086,0.0000021942133,0.00012369096,0.5465649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464033,0.0056082024,0.00011145483,0.0027756244,0.0018950097,0.000009789547,0.0000012769925,0.0000124339385,0.04318287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747837,0.00023278345,0.0002691522,0.00011910866,0.000471783,0.0014287825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989734,0.00023112028,0.0002166045,0.00017224524,0.00026558404,0.00014101207],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00381876,0.000090954345,0.00008926236,0.000060373273,0.0047306023,0.00023500726,0.00046744852,0.00007272086,0.0010262842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010575939,0.000066600245,0.00007891502,0.0004935472,0.00033326013,0.0008509994,0.000021586267,0.003104999,0.000473514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000816672,0.000054188782,0.0011298993,6.176691e-7,0.000040636234,0.0000016403543,0.0047754636,0.000030098716,0.000002239788,0.9887636,0.0048889047,0.00030454592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016953392,0.00003336132,0.00089476013,0.0000049628657,0.0000131492,0.00022337043,0.013497424,0.000008951564,0.0000037903385,0.073419064,0.91163933,0.00009227411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056564473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054317407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91534454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010850169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015455461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259381135","doi":"10.18438/b8p32r","title":"Evidence and Ethics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.10008667649907783,"score_gpt":0.39906517976796296,"score_spread":0.29897850326888514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259381135","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00403364,0.003629281,0.0012151431,0.9352226,0.000542414,0.00027392223,0.0000029880005,0.00014039602,0.0549396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7570966,0.015453863,0.008495896,0.21786857,0.00033773648,0.000027834096,0.000009331775,0.0000054532234,0.0007047064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827856,0.0007888221,0.00027286704,0.00008444466,0.0003653641,0.00020991801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874642,0.011734056,0.00029218057,0.00014191547,0.0001472217,0.00022043579],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036052952,0.000081501996,0.00006882178,0.00013208973,0.0008765614,0.0009897145,0.00012028331,0.00012851937,0.0008140968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036270034,0.00007974624,0.000014309275,0.00060775917,0.0001934458,0.54684836,0.00004929275,0.0006074383,0.00013119896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005441931,0.000031372492,0.0038835297,0.000047668098,0.000004745986,1.6450802e-7,0.015413492,0.0000019821275,0.000007906247,0.9643856,0.0060153254,0.010153776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006364325,0.000024633522,0.013971632,0.00017541143,0.00002134665,0.0000061182627,0.009942437,0.000058121354,0.00007211205,0.00018761861,0.9753645,0.000112408525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013560016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.5698727e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9693492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014617373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095408096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9718479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259984825","doi":"","title":"The Role of the Independent Lawyer and Security Certificates","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislation; Parliament; Economic Justice; Certificate; Confidentiality; Political science; Clearance; Adversarial system; Business; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.01598115932216011,"score_gpt":0.29792367756367066,"score_spread":0.28194251824151056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259984825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.813887,0.004459174,0.000020031346,0.14453523,0.00039461144,0.00013299505,9.2396806e-7,0.000011070824,0.036558963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929468,0.0046517965,0.000003361761,0.000102185484,0.00014129309,0.0000020739576,1.194756e-7,0.0000027770325,0.0021496052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889386,0.0001958049,0.00013378967,0.00005175083,0.00024559334,0.0004792094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994529,0.00015344197,0.00014481337,0.000085368614,0.00013364386,0.000029835728],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017986445,0.00003593622,0.000040139475,0.000017777598,0.0018586086,0.00006686721,0.00022047924,0.00003342058,0.000029637316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038728118,0.000020277945,0.000031280975,0.00021336092,0.00026521584,0.00021221869,0.00001800984,0.0011749913,0.000004784402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072365197,0.00003273311,0.0149497,3.1104432e-7,0.000025485697,6.7373776e-8,0.0116404975,5.313394e-7,0.00013167498,0.9675773,0.00046216437,0.0051723123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073629235,0.000015081507,0.006372053,0.0000018909398,0.000008602808,0.00005875958,0.035245586,0.0000045110346,0.00022938973,0.5094498,0.4485021,0.000038623424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018916195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011412314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4581275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015659441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035702693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260663150","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1170","title":"Book Notes: How Judges Think, by Richard A. Posner","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.029579193556591003,"score_gpt":0.33830637234663813,"score_spread":0.30872717879004713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260663150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014657303,0.0014856829,0.0003786153,0.41504088,0.0005048564,0.0000679557,0.0000045776155,0.0000494017,0.58232147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924855,0.0006479842,0.0011866335,0.04786043,0.001114354,0.000002152257,0.000008891789,0.000010718789,0.024313841],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985425,0.0002480552,0.00020927833,0.00014692478,0.0005099763,0.0003432612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886066,0.00019608752,0.00023310924,0.00014757099,0.00032411132,0.00023849215],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095073774,0.00011186793,0.00012448028,0.000059926,0.0018564475,0.0011293073,0.000317245,0.00011897657,0.0030668085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063074956,0.0000993834,0.000079116326,0.00028361863,0.00012338493,0.0020363887,0.000010661989,0.00083189824,0.0002107527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005616365,0.00009827735,0.000069434165,7.595435e-7,0.00001344665,0.00000462452,0.004250582,0.0000013953875,0.00018474345,0.46507967,0.52762634,0.0026651106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018709473,0.000047251902,0.00018925597,0.000009905797,0.00001852153,0.00002653319,0.0019875818,0.0000038611624,0.00012447528,0.03172729,0.96553516,0.00014309086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070070624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009377054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9247084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001373938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038807062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260844422","doi":"","title":"Library guides: Law: Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.029835958316949355,"score_gpt":0.3396633144199048,"score_spread":0.3098273561029555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260844422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012785477,0.000106152525,0.0000018201431,0.2446941,0.007570296,0.000118852106,0.00007087541,0.00011882758,0.7473063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012501169,0.00024478347,0.001688588,0.06100676,0.004375016,0.00001963324,0.0003791192,0.000028428349,0.93100756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864715,0.000117192874,0.00028354742,0.00020215793,0.00048798192,0.0002619372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986717,0.00051979907,0.0001887516,0.00028500796,0.00017394593,0.00016076038],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029583808,0.00012919061,0.00014606136,0.00006604579,0.0007295208,0.0006026201,0.0005389028,0.00038010522,0.04950623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090102275,0.00012191387,0.000040695373,0.0003950711,0.0001830287,0.0010884458,0.000044954137,0.0011542928,0.00017647288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.2773886e-7,0.0000070446713,0.000014296174,0.000004564015,0.000006734111,0.0000014144208,0.00040431164,2.7872108e-8,3.0423556e-7,0.3872801,0.6118039,0.0004769805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023473425,0.0000021155881,0.000013606332,0.000010837039,0.000010596371,5.3804547e-7,0.0016725012,2.2121392e-7,0.000016040674,0.0030589765,0.99501836,0.00017274868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38422114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010091286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031604905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.973885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261801851","doi":"10.53300/001c.6190","title":"Why Teach Alternative Dispute Resolution to Law Students? Part One: Past and Current Practices and Some Unanswered Questions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"La Trobe University","keywords":"Australian Curriculum; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Interactivity; Sociology; Literacy; Media literacy; Critical literacy; Perspective (graphical); Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Project commissioning; Political science; Law; Psychology; Publishing; Multimedia; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0538816666642192,"score_gpt":0.4521367093881303,"score_spread":0.3982550427239111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261801851","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015690984,0.11504334,0.00032608313,0.82111776,0.0036613327,0.0025683586,0.00003407839,0.00013834132,0.041419704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52193934,0.2887125,0.0077158725,0.14228204,0.012060506,0.0029137481,0.0006082035,0.00009534548,0.023672445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801654,0.0005570712,0.00041181289,0.00034903173,0.0004475516,0.000218017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984394,0.00021726915,0.0005211376,0.0002136293,0.00042505705,0.00018351081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012284009,0.00013707844,0.00019177617,0.00010125806,0.00078871584,0.0007029762,0.00018674658,0.000047492493,0.00013925343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012952263,0.00013831152,0.00003134326,0.0005923521,0.00016764818,0.0024408519,0.000049198938,0.00031974263,0.00005785483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004063306,0.00062105234,0.0013662925,0.00021257014,0.000013778552,1.53863e-7,0.0016120041,9.3666216e-7,0.0000066382163,0.8152318,0.16136324,0.01956747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077483586,0.00002167014,0.0070443195,0.0009327009,0.0000900421,0.0000026378784,0.000599651,0.0000016146467,0.0000025133402,0.002736066,0.9883302,0.0001611177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036996994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006071466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82696694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015880357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069367577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9694157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262337073","doi":"","title":"The Use of Academic Writing in Appellate Judicial Decision-Making","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Realm; Precedent; General partnership; Law of the case; Common law; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.03535756109489537,"score_gpt":0.39205727080439784,"score_spread":0.3566997097095025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262337073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673225,0.0003364333,0.0012868705,0.024827108,0.0010717325,0.000112047725,5.291395e-7,0.000012233188,0.0050304895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99667853,0.0019568074,0.00029586456,0.00019046626,0.00056988123,0.0000014899003,1.7174884e-7,0.0000060770512,0.00030068407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815315,0.00016154224,0.00037780975,0.00007685602,0.00030986257,0.00092079083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977034,0.0017150175,0.0002892638,0.00008538498,0.00017127919,0.000035666824],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00621353,0.000050537124,0.000071248855,0.00011329481,0.0008571394,0.00017416402,0.00028693798,0.000099081626,0.000056457153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005547425,0.000039885435,0.000038790848,0.00057807664,0.0001403345,0.0007028023,0.00001883419,0.0054139714,0.000012603375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002127689,0.000015357384,0.0071478304,3.3652407e-7,0.000009373783,3.3783752e-7,0.0023757617,0.000019087018,0.00025221423,0.7719415,0.00024183425,0.21797512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019952204,0.000025115287,0.0042535346,0.00004599102,0.000010738064,0.000040643212,0.01703434,0.00010002074,0.000017617333,0.68761134,0.29055187,0.000109250876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010789608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048353657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29031003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002338965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063106013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262479844","doi":"","title":"Confidentiality, Human Relationship, and Law Reform","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Mandate; Commission; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Human rights; Law reform; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.036906036011336296,"score_gpt":0.37900141807996296,"score_spread":0.34209538206862666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262479844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09870657,0.0005303672,0.00062837044,0.025455326,0.00041484914,0.00010428827,5.6529365e-7,0.000034433124,0.87412524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854877,0.0003382963,0.00006149714,0.00042004415,0.0001835402,0.0000024252174,0.0000015613662,0.000005654546,0.013499273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985081,0.0002856104,0.00018526208,0.00008546177,0.00021374656,0.0007218073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950075,0.0000792139,0.00012660322,0.00007439394,0.00014314614,0.00007587161],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004173343,0.00005204686,0.000059017504,0.00006114832,0.001941562,0.00029356265,0.00009436426,0.000062233725,0.00026096834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003915494,0.00005048536,0.000026841693,0.0002379571,0.00015627919,0.0007797648,0.0000060558896,0.0015824839,0.000031182433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001253458,0.000020829808,0.001765713,6.13274e-7,0.000013912637,1.54775e-7,0.002746725,1.2135504e-7,0.000018213266,0.9950805,0.00010838408,0.00024358174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013610248,0.0000212568,0.00067248876,0.000002305125,0.000011866619,0.000041970794,0.021388222,1.2997731e-7,0.000009137248,0.6933077,0.28434983,0.000058967722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010028291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07212326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88678116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007649631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003242261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263174178","doi":"","title":"Not a Box But a Window: Law Libraries and Legal Education in a Virtual World","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Window (computing); Space (punctuation); Legal education; Space law; Law; Law library; Political science; Degree (music); Library science; Engineering; Computer science; Outer space; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.015527317846836143,"score_gpt":0.3219064605408305,"score_spread":0.30637914269399436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263174178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64480263,0.0012853985,0.0003986897,0.16178332,0.0007923738,0.00022047925,0.0000012928544,0.0000466086,0.19066921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9488804,0.0012141763,0.00010243633,0.00255941,0.0007172997,0.000009780256,0.000002431166,0.000008773638,0.04650531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824,0.0002087676,0.00023607533,0.00013416665,0.000242351,0.0009386207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994475,0.00014686499,0.0001322138,0.0000763072,0.00010153994,0.000095547926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016061631,0.00008452155,0.00009770567,0.00024308874,0.00057703955,0.0005925231,0.00015829991,0.000056340294,0.00016770238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000321081,0.00008525508,0.000029370856,0.0007373931,0.00016834054,0.0023781362,0.000016129487,0.0017842246,0.000024778643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044991873,0.00011494048,0.0023331575,6.806449e-7,0.0000127278045,0.0000015587908,0.0026805336,0.00000121067,0.000051387116,0.97287446,0.00041747867,0.021466894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037326076,0.00007789331,0.0019393775,0.000017659639,0.000012938761,0.00017592202,0.042444367,0.0000048806974,0.000028450559,0.19260661,0.762167,0.0001516576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015232525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20135999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78026783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005552385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021896955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99132514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263291795","doi":"","title":"Reform of the Australian Broadcasting Authority's Enforcement Powers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Sanctions; Broadcasting (networking); Business; Law and economics; Law; Computer security; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.021722011010470242,"score_gpt":0.33757894586717435,"score_spread":0.31585693485670413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263291795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23630169,0.00022256421,0.0005703018,0.124515384,0.0016524857,0.00023624637,0.000002340419,0.000034657784,0.63646436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629006,0.00008300405,0.00006674354,0.00009870621,0.0004253866,0.0000015492021,9.972088e-7,0.000004480739,0.03641857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983263,0.00012020115,0.00025784806,0.00006623278,0.0003573855,0.00087204867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993758,0.000037826216,0.00029015908,0.00009408354,0.00016838258,0.00003371937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025894844,0.00005513462,0.00006175195,0.000056304365,0.00081133837,0.00008849649,0.00025976612,0.00004800141,0.0002466398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016898187,0.00004022382,0.00006720847,0.00047501462,0.00010433454,0.0003725161,0.000014268944,0.0013485971,0.000009910418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038223225,0.000030392468,0.0009784823,0.0000010028788,0.000014353338,8.48258e-8,0.0013083272,0.000016023912,0.00010786114,0.9939582,0.00076473615,0.0028167341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025153763,0.000060970237,0.0026920468,0.000018646702,0.00003065704,0.00003203846,0.07456624,0.000006798798,0.00023996414,0.22831054,0.6936683,0.00012227197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031066231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018756926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76564765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015511471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005956022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263546145","doi":"","title":"Mandatory Legal Education is a Step in the Right Direction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law; Continuing education; History","score_opus":0.015868998204993077,"score_gpt":0.3349608280330446,"score_spread":0.3190918298280515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263546145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40333393,0.0019682462,0.0007752193,0.23360476,0.0022329218,0.0003536353,0.0000012097437,0.000045836015,0.35768422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743376,0.0028017557,0.000045778095,0.0023699014,0.0008604067,0.000014881293,0.0000022960473,0.000005364355,0.019562034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983176,0.00037743628,0.0001858731,0.00009663061,0.00033030246,0.0006921707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999497,0.000093211675,0.00013089227,0.000097506076,0.00014456156,0.000036833746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00279513,0.000060026625,0.00005796062,0.00014290803,0.0012032074,0.00013676556,0.00022219215,0.000054110515,0.0002928292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023040011,0.00004630713,0.000041811956,0.00065380847,0.00008550644,0.000980172,0.000004629502,0.0018223361,0.00007209796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011788602,0.00024208637,0.0029488143,8.6790624e-7,0.00001579854,0.0000013164505,0.018871734,6.73701e-7,0.0000109088405,0.9324005,0.027313305,0.0181822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012373968,0.00002972194,0.0046888306,0.000004396544,0.000007849181,0.00023503024,0.026868802,0.0000029694313,0.000005732809,0.032213256,0.9357511,0.000068604444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006475677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023413494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9084378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009322003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018161433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99440664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264396694","doi":"","title":"Accessing Quality?: Legal Education and the Diversity Challenge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Diversity (politics); Framing (construction); Political science; Population; Legal education; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Ethnic group; Call to action; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Epistemology; Marketing","score_opus":0.046537775571030664,"score_gpt":0.40051122625457614,"score_spread":0.35397345068354547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264396694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30202898,0.003666884,0.0014017695,0.47772494,0.0009924917,0.00016669299,3.2797388e-7,0.000033653872,0.21398427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97799754,0.009482648,0.000027466998,0.00096889085,0.0007483494,0.0000027444537,7.754405e-7,0.0000034436293,0.010768139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841636,0.0004629907,0.00014937042,0.00008695233,0.0002590992,0.00062521436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932075,0.00019753264,0.00017177002,0.00007555912,0.00017826291,0.000056137447],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005267437,0.00005253872,0.00006905324,0.000060574865,0.0030890482,0.0003917465,0.00021728566,0.000042567626,0.000102180195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061559805,0.000039406248,0.000035037494,0.000291079,0.00020235339,0.0012800228,0.000046213812,0.0013571172,0.0000102929525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025733787,0.00005642499,0.0025194744,6.2524146e-7,0.000017810064,1.2336801e-7,0.01051784,3.1902306e-7,9.886107e-7,0.9231648,0.0002311155,0.063464776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047210368,0.000017978213,0.0033413246,0.0000055773485,0.000025522037,0.00006254199,0.11103166,0.000003901614,4.2303205e-7,0.46463832,0.42031327,0.00008739959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013052991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028720638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6759686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044429017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007032856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264883797","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Raymond Challinor, a Radical Lawyer in Victorian England: W. P. Roberts and the Struggle for Workers' Rights (London: I. B. Tauris & Co. Ltd., 1990)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Dignity; Politics; Law; Delegate; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.008702989293868157,"score_gpt":0.3220525506868921,"score_spread":0.31334956139302395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264883797","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012425532,0.6675788,0.0025367173,0.2976509,0.0014564024,0.0017940418,0.0000053728077,0.00004973764,0.016502466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5534513,0.3627998,0.00046724686,0.029437933,0.0065440075,0.00013233669,0.000033327484,0.000054326527,0.047079727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728525,0.0003893843,0.00045462753,0.00018483738,0.00036327625,0.0013226048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984473,0.0008722622,0.00026113962,0.0001335108,0.00014927104,0.00013650602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010345304,0.00013049014,0.00023028009,0.000111169655,0.0009992898,0.00015582508,0.0002616806,0.00011831101,0.0003647856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006263122,0.00009052567,0.0000912997,0.00043011893,0.00026155013,0.00054475263,0.000012690983,0.0019351924,0.000010361038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083377707,0.00028394244,0.001744983,0.00004598228,0.00020308618,0.000013008333,0.022748416,0.0000015111914,0.000010815845,0.7044935,0.24426098,0.025359988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001910141,0.000052387986,0.00009526554,0.00007752185,0.00003579796,0.000073959716,0.0013109939,0.0000034504974,0.000006749656,0.037322644,0.9589927,0.000118342265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026204821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037511148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71473175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005469198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033293345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98005176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265015261","doi":"","title":"What Do Changing Cultures of Dispute Resolution Mean for Legal Education","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Mediation; Political science; Dispute resolution; Law; Legal education; Alternative dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Legal profession; Legal practice; Public relations; Business","score_opus":0.019909569352956336,"score_gpt":0.3766945872902479,"score_spread":0.35678501793729156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265015261","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40189725,0.024520382,0.058771543,0.4352639,0.013881119,0.0016268641,0.0000069000757,0.00014596221,0.06388606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96744657,0.013447372,0.0003306918,0.00041147394,0.001524917,0.000018915984,0.000010302347,0.000009035877,0.016800743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984335,0.00011902303,0.00021864538,0.00010192184,0.00024143851,0.00088552816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909085,0.00007888389,0.00025924726,0.000080257814,0.00043525634,0.000055532328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002645073,0.0000642661,0.000079669226,0.0001871495,0.0008117706,0.00033893943,0.00016556117,0.00006022334,0.00005667636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040087703,0.000060344748,0.000069925205,0.00058006647,0.000058288242,0.002233561,0.000007753456,0.0006666191,0.0000056386434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026063684,0.00008816982,0.00019955695,0.0000025372176,0.000025318512,5.2019086e-8,0.010239362,0.000009023557,0.00008972365,0.9360599,0.0014263424,0.05183397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016519705,0.000063808504,0.00008805169,0.000036542093,0.000027014441,0.000040551095,0.17280874,0.000019014797,0.000039712595,0.14129126,0.6853344,0.000085744156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094094727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073529473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79476863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006689596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007962531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265276945","doi":"","title":"Harry and the Steelworker: Teaching Labor Law to Non-Lawyers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal education; Labour law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014907525971349879,"score_gpt":0.3278016135726089,"score_spread":0.31289408760125903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265276945","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29733926,0.0010141751,0.0014942116,0.46052596,0.0007907668,0.00031810123,0.0000014504426,0.00004354476,0.23847252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776902,0.0013591244,0.00019361555,0.005335736,0.00066128117,0.000007322634,4.6140616e-7,0.000007683844,0.014744561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826473,0.0003293044,0.0001636281,0.000098371034,0.0002643416,0.00087959593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993291,0.00026979798,0.00009911129,0.00009151806,0.00011196224,0.00009852631],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044680303,0.00006626762,0.0000869731,0.00005147118,0.0032759118,0.00020562258,0.00021382207,0.0000417732,0.000053106713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062705146,0.000047270605,0.000035287172,0.0002821467,0.00025346223,0.0005593714,0.000018310244,0.00231542,0.000044326243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028592267,0.000019608562,0.0004086755,3.6967387e-7,0.000027298898,8.1181844e-7,0.021962529,0.0000037782022,0.000011319963,0.97276795,0.0019500534,0.0028190222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063112285,0.000047296748,0.0007605641,0.000008159807,0.000019055338,0.00016107917,0.045759115,0.000008648404,0.0000050076005,0.075035736,0.8774495,0.00011472631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070498553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013191089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8977322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034125758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040364284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265984311","doi":"","title":"Gender Equality and Lawyers Work: Education as a Strategy for Change in the Legal Profession?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Political science; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Law; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1266116101943197,"score_gpt":0.47050896067045567,"score_spread":0.34389735047613595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265984311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6700512,0.0018631503,0.00052921375,0.26813024,0.0007933579,0.00095313677,0.0000010266195,0.000021130947,0.057657544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99103457,0.0013458481,0.00003563073,0.0022882589,0.0007345543,0.00009353399,0.0000036534466,0.0000052216933,0.004458754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983518,0.00039544856,0.00017107149,0.00010179529,0.00020580548,0.0007740898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994512,0.00016608652,0.00012936056,0.000071653485,0.00013578283,0.00004592519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050084936,0.0000604916,0.000059968042,0.00007924527,0.00071379007,0.00024311926,0.00015907144,0.00006228023,0.00007445335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003180499,0.00004507875,0.00002648469,0.0005046823,0.000056418372,0.0008517714,0.0000062935396,0.0011482937,0.0000069880043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030660893,0.000121098295,0.0043085394,0.0000019282752,0.000008939387,1.7435659e-7,0.01927177,4.1032615e-7,0.0000024547337,0.9248218,0.00047396892,0.050958242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030917523,0.00007858533,0.013728884,0.000012679082,0.000017185459,0.00006212976,0.26356158,0.0000042494994,8.1413583e-7,0.3572773,0.36483595,0.00011149101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00660128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025123728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5675445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003820708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010631498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266007141","doi":"","title":"Canada's Courts Online: Privacy, Public Access and Electronic Court Records","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Information privacy; Copying; Privacy policy; Business; Personally identifiable information; Public records; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04069308922580835,"score_gpt":0.34028466217425757,"score_spread":0.29959157294844924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266007141","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2477735,0.0038436307,0.00048149112,0.71100587,0.0011864542,0.0002932285,0.000012308924,0.00007639759,0.03532712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96630734,0.017461784,0.00003706106,0.0023387526,0.0008538431,0.0000065425297,0.000007417523,0.000018216191,0.012969018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961569,0.00026865973,0.00031909943,0.00021426739,0.0005734496,0.0024676272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874735,0.00018639794,0.00028235812,0.00016349714,0.00038160855,0.00023880089],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002150856,0.00014216083,0.00015122144,0.0001543944,0.0013324219,0.0007053895,0.00058470445,0.00009464473,0.0009911094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011022054,0.00014077715,0.000040727617,0.00063006027,0.00011238943,0.0016000367,0.00004442219,0.0032089124,0.000013360605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010447613,0.00020897975,0.008204088,0.0000034108778,0.00013282597,0.0000035154367,0.0014028171,0.0000020800423,0.000007661336,0.8550743,0.07264474,0.06230516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002742366,0.00006202667,0.0016462666,0.000005476704,0.000023259454,0.00013197023,0.0029518493,0.00006154708,0.0000018669548,0.062549084,0.93210584,0.0001865699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45399076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97093207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8594611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032878735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04522402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266719558","doi":"","title":"Proof and Progress: Coping with the Law of Evidence in a Technological Age","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Coping (psychology); Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.07475189726486693,"score_gpt":0.3563132170176619,"score_spread":0.28156131975279497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266719558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53819287,0.0009551705,0.0000451982,0.39973158,0.00008644565,0.0013871047,0.0000012772878,0.00009270808,0.059507627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964453,0.000025937845,0.0010202519,0.0017344259,0.000039518432,0.00016848643,4.4672757e-7,0.0000034286595,0.0005622063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922115,0.00015211319,0.00013768976,0.00012824888,0.00020894186,0.00015185897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992811,0.00030295277,0.000096815435,0.00014666269,0.00012768399,0.000044779907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070794666,0.000054484077,0.0000850303,0.000027510174,0.00027709416,0.00020716406,0.00019285688,0.00006532519,0.00022143908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005887265,0.00003057992,0.0000100604075,0.000521386,0.0011917892,0.0008931742,0.000033910015,0.00030436827,0.000023922692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000691798,0.000060926897,0.009146495,0.000015524736,0.0000053334443,0.0000019497456,0.003583818,8.8968574e-7,0.0001392366,0.98362046,0.0014623598,0.001956086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037965196,0.0001618425,0.021387506,0.00036190302,0.000017268088,0.000005521418,0.016838346,0.000010703901,0.0008540654,0.018626692,0.94109535,0.00026117067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012531589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018783286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9649938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030269457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016459156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267117444","doi":"","title":"'Are Law Schools Amoral Boot Camps?': Two Legal Ethicists Beg to Differ with a Controversial Book- Review of Lawyers Gone Bad: Money, Sex and Madness in Canada’s Legal Profession by Philip Slayton","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Macabre; Law; Legal ethics; Political science; Legal profession; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.013109946723821873,"score_gpt":0.3157874134528103,"score_spread":0.30267746672898843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267117444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58698255,0.026544658,0.0001029321,0.3766958,0.0005904398,0.0012769189,0.00004604534,0.000029167331,0.0077314423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712122,0.009360961,0.000022994514,0.01426861,0.00018053809,0.000019437937,0.00000859507,0.000017064784,0.004909562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996846,0.0005287801,0.00046292515,0.0002477918,0.00076091295,0.0011535557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867207,0.00013823794,0.00048548914,0.00014974542,0.00032427197,0.00023019375],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020066448,0.00017840165,0.0003781222,0.00009581112,0.00071775675,0.00007730768,0.00022075429,0.00008360504,0.00013229271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004817907,0.0001527608,0.000040299423,0.00047560697,0.00017666598,0.0010122352,0.00002988449,0.0028583521,0.0000037529649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015793034,0.0007871293,0.06663533,0.000516711,0.00043129246,0.00019041686,0.012839138,0.000028385879,0.0012651918,0.5161623,0.39627236,0.003292483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031644094,0.00031204388,0.0047204345,0.0016721182,0.000103919505,0.00044434855,0.024337202,0.0000068899335,0.00022326624,0.001170454,0.9632399,0.0006050335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8057344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9664654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56696755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024097392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028455328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267624397","doi":"10.1017/s0012217314000559","title":"Constructivism in EthicsCARLA BAGNOLI, EDITORS Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013; 258 pp.; $95.00 (hardback)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructivism (international relations); Media studies; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025411118235003166,"score_gpt":0.2979189782608258,"score_spread":0.2725078600258226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267624397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11352469,0.00019123899,0.00037519858,0.07301835,0.018341467,0.0006643837,0.00014606044,0.00026731857,0.7934713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98478943,0.0005665563,0.0002593048,0.0009954439,0.0044617783,0.0000086607,0.000080650556,0.000016604601,0.0088215815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801093,0.00075340766,0.00021952068,0.00029695657,0.00035607093,0.00036313754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982452,0.00087941065,0.0001669229,0.00026221893,0.00028775274,0.0001585178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001345978,0.00013147068,0.00017925193,0.00009799905,0.00050256506,0.0001559381,0.00034201538,0.00026675922,0.00007494956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019398622,0.0001525921,0.000058113816,0.000599323,0.00050342706,0.0009276132,0.00005584801,0.00075975765,0.00014504862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011116959,0.00006865793,0.0058625443,0.0000070410388,0.000010421035,0.000003111335,0.0024773784,0.000008809995,0.000024559231,0.43339476,0.5574679,0.00066374894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033630565,0.000014111207,0.011978199,0.000013338304,0.000012819763,0.0000012214879,0.0022652769,0.000045084304,0.000043752523,0.0001319281,0.98496854,0.0001894043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083882734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005012091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87126476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020108599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009973926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9222178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267645977","doi":"","title":"Ch. 13: Growing Legal Aid Ontario in the Middle Class: A Proposal for Public Legal Expenses","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Legal research; Debtor; Creditor; Middle class; Law; Legal service; Finance; Political science; Debt","score_opus":0.09153201216646628,"score_gpt":0.32662581775626903,"score_spread":0.23509380558980275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267645977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60549986,0.0005644671,0.0016192829,0.20050725,0.0017401522,0.0010086799,0.0000025399115,0.000069118294,0.18898863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884255,0.00009414788,0.00049982546,0.0013752346,0.00068502984,0.00006541705,0.000003973209,0.000013617504,0.008837251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704564,0.00036241754,0.00034239478,0.00017344326,0.00039797305,0.001678145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915296,0.00018769476,0.00021191916,0.00014143523,0.00022789309,0.00007807135],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054802904,0.000119060045,0.00012476472,0.00017689704,0.0011626389,0.0006342069,0.0005608029,0.00009262618,0.00029985784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007379978,0.00009110898,0.00010611783,0.00050794764,0.00012930059,0.0033272274,0.00001681535,0.002560361,0.000025027262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043748452,0.00018446133,0.002019184,0.0000016103195,0.000032698692,0.0000022034385,0.044370778,3.5422153e-7,0.000016620223,0.95041007,0.0009570507,0.001961245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005595957,0.00022412512,0.0008883881,0.000011234092,0.000023454164,0.00014624198,0.14585431,0.0000044943454,0.000019942434,0.1733938,0.6787052,0.00016922373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14434837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8874166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7770162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015897419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039902568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268057158","doi":"","title":"The Changing Shape of Legal Information","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Political science; Legal education; Engineering ethics; Law and economics; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.019842072472614287,"score_gpt":0.31902009496193656,"score_spread":0.2991780224893223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268057158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06561942,0.00011530594,0.00017516491,0.13438123,0.00094602024,0.0002560013,0.000004661383,0.00009080131,0.79841137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918788,0.00003552405,0.00031377928,0.0044084676,0.00026155845,0.000006532709,0.000006236063,0.0000018993869,0.003087192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992164,0.00007750494,0.00020566084,0.000049804836,0.00026538878,0.00018525614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993029,0.00014340323,0.00014656993,0.00013227294,0.00021387936,0.00006093031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094101665,0.00004514336,0.00005296551,0.00005452731,0.0009847009,0.00037745445,0.00018989823,0.000042461295,0.00039168977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000821366,0.000036373844,0.00003066728,0.0005760961,0.00009735039,0.0026042692,0.000010654876,0.00019051114,0.00020709033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004816603,0.000013903034,0.00006617487,0.0000012679197,0.0000031846018,8.0647894e-8,0.005112695,0.000003286892,0.000029307315,0.97344434,0.0055788844,0.015742071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007361009,0.00001483883,0.0011642475,0.00000634928,0.000003914606,4.4137346e-7,0.006360382,0.000036077352,0.00009520332,0.0033922575,0.9888029,0.00004976962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027661526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011983864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98322403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046359575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032124502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75736225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268101846","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2016.00745.x","title":"Is the Blush off the Rose? Legal Education Metaphors in a Changing World","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Legal education; Globalization; Resizing; Generative grammar; Legal realism; Political science; Sociology; Law; Legal profession; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.03473922675876476,"score_gpt":0.36703581993852225,"score_spread":0.33229659317975746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268101846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15456828,0.00089908944,0.00007589092,0.73149484,0.0011240164,0.00013060088,0.0000018202512,0.000005566464,0.11169992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715807,0.00062301126,0.00015169852,0.015381612,0.0005567285,0.000003436015,9.570803e-8,0.0000028899397,0.011699849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992842,0.00014919155,0.00018784453,0.00004728663,0.0002130441,0.00011844503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912214,0.0003943959,0.00020491812,0.00006672801,0.0001749531,0.00003683781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022941087,0.000040008454,0.000065811255,0.000054409997,0.0006209872,0.00017452933,0.00013787346,0.000029581246,0.00012584441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015936152,0.000017862012,0.00008673953,0.0006558428,0.00020262417,0.0006886293,0.000013425112,0.0002331956,0.0000028959341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004263505,0.000058775375,0.0009741408,0.0000020009795,0.000030004068,2.0412413e-7,0.13375045,2.3659437e-7,0.00008555317,0.81373394,0.036996044,0.014364372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009749509,0.0000063297716,0.0015823353,0.000023059536,0.00001591046,0.000003830907,0.03551108,0.000002690288,0.00003638889,0.0042035165,0.9584854,0.00003194084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079774106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011723391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92148936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007051721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006733914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47761944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268198655","doi":"","title":"Crossing Borders in the Classroom: A Comparative Law Experiment in Family Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Converse; Legal education; Family law; Curriculum; Law enforcement; Value (mathematics); Comparative law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10075040362343494,"score_gpt":0.4191502376183162,"score_spread":0.31839983399488125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268198655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41968593,0.0011618322,0.00018305978,0.017940395,0.0002705143,0.00023054492,4.7471943e-7,0.00001503584,0.56051224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714184,0.0002031019,0.0001136954,0.0019963717,0.00010425745,0.000015566891,6.9873806e-7,0.0000044411827,0.00042000695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794745,0.00049072923,0.00024527792,0.00010277521,0.000253502,0.0009602693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956656,0.00011779574,0.00012309517,0.00008562769,0.0000735004,0.000033432047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031221139,0.0000710451,0.00009338465,0.00009459691,0.0010123182,0.00045664326,0.00027810535,0.000050423096,0.000084801875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045617577,0.000057762296,0.000033026663,0.00055996893,0.00037583176,0.0007519006,0.000009280697,0.0019386474,0.000025561487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001669832,0.00013137597,0.00027860742,2.7700747e-7,0.000008152502,0.0000011477943,0.14435652,0.000001919225,0.000042234267,0.8545723,0.00012255041,0.00046821468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004061895,0.000076524884,0.0012644124,0.000011400501,0.000005093144,0.000012790734,0.49497792,0.000006875413,0.00003918528,0.25950193,0.24358642,0.000111252484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1231291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51830953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59507036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009704393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005718318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268432699","doi":"","title":"Therapeutic Consequences of Civil Actions for Damages and Compensation Claims by Victims of Sexual Abuse - An Empirical Study","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Compensation (psychology); Context (archaeology); Settlement (finance); Government (linguistics); Psychology; Criminology; Financial compensation; Sexual abuse; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Poison control; Medical emergency; Business; History","score_opus":0.06708718390976699,"score_gpt":0.42457870056139685,"score_spread":0.35749151665162987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268432699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991505,0.00022645456,0.0005905029,0.0061897635,0.00008114869,0.00027633758,0.000008375242,0.000012313941,0.0011100956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979664,0.0007539922,0.000064660344,0.00012837246,0.000089920024,0.000010134362,0.0000062104514,0.00000620182,0.0009741079],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859434,0.00034848452,0.000284259,0.00011513634,0.00022993814,0.00042785614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911916,0.00029301937,0.00021470612,0.00008500976,0.00023352924,0.00005458121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019379539,0.0000677038,0.00012659369,0.000080763406,0.00054399663,0.000074778676,0.00013583667,0.000053215135,0.00026993855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007684966,0.00006129823,0.000021049796,0.00030260373,0.0002706014,0.00066699384,0.0000025223849,0.0005698512,0.0000013129765],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070783787,0.0059536016,0.13557573,0.00003261569,0.0010180672,6.539077e-7,0.4002594,0.00011049117,0.020862378,0.2782768,0.0018626802,0.15533973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021747276,0.004660033,0.018483002,0.00001549622,0.00034886328,0.00006145213,0.7760961,0.00012819441,0.00042263113,0.1282765,0.06895929,0.00037369216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016048553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020273495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3758367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014580986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026959314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99760395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268527666","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2614","title":"Book Notes: Law as Engineering: Thinking About What Lawyers Do, by David Howarth","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.016690624565669096,"score_gpt":0.3051201048877895,"score_spread":0.2884294803221204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268527666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001068114,0.0051134173,0.0005934923,0.12757334,0.0023516326,0.00025811215,0.0000037904256,0.00013872093,0.86289936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647665,0.0017080207,0.0016842448,0.025214873,0.00096958724,0.000022687927,0.00000974543,0.000032279604,0.0055920333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981629,0.00016097775,0.00034763027,0.00019719372,0.00066156994,0.0004696797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984818,0.0003554425,0.0002540777,0.00019662772,0.00036636472,0.00034566442],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009536008,0.00016147783,0.0001580177,0.000062621,0.0019202983,0.0047934707,0.00044058767,0.00015020487,0.0075461827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003934742,0.00015408194,0.000092543545,0.0002686716,0.00018496293,0.0074898563,0.00003334746,0.0010323926,0.0008040406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029331093,0.000065311906,0.000045735997,0.0000043319974,0.000033492477,0.0000044105664,0.0090995375,0.000042832737,0.0002008382,0.9452202,0.043757766,0.0015226488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020956193,0.000026018504,0.000045183548,0.0000877859,0.000018659242,0.00003326646,0.004444428,0.000025638103,0.00017433795,0.024694404,0.9700267,0.00021406203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1060092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015583962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9636984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017364458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037521636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268554781","doi":"","title":"Reflections on the U.K. Tribunal Reform: A Canadian Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Legislation; Law; Accountability; Legislature; Mandate; Public administration; Economic Justice; Commission","score_opus":0.2633364792858934,"score_gpt":0.4646374575554811,"score_spread":0.2013009782695877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268554781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00114819,0.0000020676325,0.000016807824,0.21941622,0.00025727943,0.00008692691,0.0000020951823,0.000028782018,0.77904165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610527,0.0000057656357,0.00019682695,0.008353463,0.00014788717,0.000022365011,7.951038e-7,0.0000027697847,0.030217396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947906,0.000105628875,0.00006382469,0.00007832305,0.0001152921,0.00015786885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942344,0.00007852681,0.000027102002,0.00011006209,0.0002530583,0.00010781822],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049901445,0.000034466495,0.000026505297,0.00009228803,0.0013815558,0.00007567663,0.00012972555,0.00003656933,0.012548748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007198569,0.000022340151,0.000021628663,0.00063764025,0.00010280199,0.0002536866,0.0000034943675,0.00022139991,0.000618352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022734,0.000020622305,0.000028077833,3.9440945e-8,0.000005187385,2.1667114e-7,0.061779138,2.3057668e-8,0.0000015121715,0.9219763,0.016093295,0.000093303825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022878152,0.00001791135,0.0017721149,9.641024e-7,0.000003539909,5.7667665e-7,0.24931574,6.2499834e-7,0.000027334047,0.03692875,0.71186763,0.00004195645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9693222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96634865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95990455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008055018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001988888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268632605","doi":"","title":"Юридический прагматизм и социологическое направление в американском праве","year":2008,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Вестник Пермского университета Юридические науки","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Sociology; Order (exchange); Social order; Political science; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.12770670078315297,"score_gpt":0.41240248903052934,"score_spread":0.2846957882473764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268632605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17832188,0.006877641,0.001026634,0.12034034,0.022828123,0.003752158,0.0006412068,0.0021197626,0.66409224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8396506,0.005376554,0.0020749285,0.011308209,0.0072186408,0.0003188661,0.00039381854,0.00040192826,0.13325651],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826611,0.00239861,0.0035295722,0.0030624028,0.004201383,0.0041469336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98746455,0.0023072,0.002266619,0.0032985858,0.0023404695,0.0023225758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039011075,0.0021648786,0.0021324633,0.0015785203,0.0076214825,0.0015810317,0.003565749,0.00204588,0.030991046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040455675,0.0024125846,0.0013082244,0.0076482394,0.0037701693,0.0057209344,0.0007894707,0.0050537973,0.025974233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049159554,0.0045342813,0.01746984,0.0003462379,0.0010348805,0.0007215525,0.09283524,0.00014848473,0.0014352989,0.11141336,0.7410112,0.028557997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025312712,0.00044570206,0.017321061,0.0003237177,0.00045996893,0.00042394252,0.012019909,0.00025697617,0.0011722868,0.003229998,0.95879143,0.0030237604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01589259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033902882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6613287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001663601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009422384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269312455","doi":"","title":"Introduction - Calling for Change: Women, Law and the Legal Profession","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legal education; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Diversity (politics); Accountability; Sociology; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.019185215730997896,"score_gpt":0.34634046778529476,"score_spread":0.32715525205429685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269312455","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09912232,0.0014079115,0.0044760923,0.8775901,0.001965039,0.00070889544,0.0000013236137,0.000044981716,0.014683292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981935,0.00060649647,0.000084710795,0.0011411319,0.0074534123,0.00008078973,0.0000030191716,0.000006587411,0.008688804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998646,0.00018739438,0.00014760547,0.000086938584,0.0001561215,0.00077591324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994936,0.00013200808,0.00013531944,0.00005242012,0.000158503,0.000028152992],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004823996,0.000049551934,0.00006435589,0.00003801031,0.0016980593,0.00023194475,0.00008673048,0.00004370118,0.000036586578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024613895,0.000034061522,0.000024949368,0.00018882229,0.00016293839,0.00076635514,0.00000674819,0.00097547716,0.0000038935154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058522284,0.000021312046,0.000024224842,0.0000015019394,0.000009737937,3.4704552e-8,0.0041982047,0.0000012730258,0.00002576502,0.9903326,0.00121092,0.004115925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041001168,0.000027875549,0.000027547729,0.0000022492547,0.000009144751,0.000014735491,0.020056458,0.00001505958,0.000008459164,0.33673954,0.6426472,0.00004170589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006443533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01682396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88281274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005339975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015990372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269476679","doi":"","title":"Write a Wikipedia Article for Law School Credit - Really?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Legal writing; Work (physics); Legal education; Law; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; Public relations; Sociology; Legal research; Engineering","score_opus":0.021932507274025324,"score_gpt":0.3513724444477634,"score_spread":0.32943993717373804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269476679","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10214423,0.0008964791,0.035090055,0.6493612,0.0026286026,0.000716391,0.000017507813,0.00019417789,0.20895135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97089314,0.0010307112,0.00037287484,0.0014045429,0.0025010044,0.000023278706,0.0000011412853,0.000012705373,0.023760624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793595,0.00012300171,0.00022149539,0.00012275086,0.00025594886,0.0013408366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892426,0.00032307627,0.00015049026,0.00011135087,0.0003283939,0.0001624184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030992255,0.000068646135,0.000077562785,0.000060652794,0.0008720176,0.00020367999,0.00021471102,0.000068371606,0.0004915218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016568273,0.00005080746,0.00006566234,0.00024668998,0.00011861207,0.0012078957,0.000009268857,0.0007740023,0.00020586446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030317591,0.000044049844,0.00040704428,7.193033e-7,0.00002845131,2.19913e-7,0.00067744683,1.8019347e-7,0.00059539685,0.9789918,0.0069204783,0.012303872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038691674,0.000068886,0.00015320035,0.000007103023,0.000014614159,0.000012939206,0.0031669715,0.0000012849877,0.00005099325,0.4225787,0.57348466,0.00007372624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012176612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017877512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8687489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008216995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00806334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269765891","doi":"","title":"From Archetypes to Architects: Re-Envisioning the Role Morality of Trial Level Judges","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Impartiality; Archetype; Honesty; Independence (probability theory); Identity (music); Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11698204667649516,"score_gpt":0.3815912395627393,"score_spread":0.2646091928862442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269765891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85479414,0.00047827684,0.0028787162,0.06349942,0.00077427574,0.00037310855,0.000012495291,0.000030267034,0.07715931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672365,0.00015209292,0.0007686835,0.00041827277,0.00076863565,0.000007032667,0.0000014607139,0.000007140158,0.0011530021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980307,0.0004755795,0.00028869725,0.00011811844,0.0003453537,0.0007415269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900687,0.00034201486,0.00023534967,0.0001704636,0.00016719302,0.00007811201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042471616,0.000070151786,0.000108265274,0.00008094134,0.0006198733,0.000083613224,0.00043642736,0.000050447125,0.000545228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017836848,0.000050697527,0.00007053712,0.00040426277,0.00012408178,0.00030366913,0.000032598404,0.0015042018,0.000035097717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016957793,0.00021921143,0.0020008052,8.6959494e-7,0.00013088372,3.471118e-7,0.11047673,0.00000763339,0.00026600738,0.8111508,0.00051884784,0.07353211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016037043,0.00026022497,0.0041279243,0.00001176528,0.000037151185,0.0000037087289,0.12817374,0.00000381529,0.00027131345,0.7924328,0.07294855,0.00012530686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02536207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019123925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14192955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002577571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045847935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270082067","doi":"","title":"Queering Legal Education: A Project of Theoretical Discovery","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Scholarship; Legal education; Transformative learning; Sociology; Curriculum; Queer theory; Empirical legal studies; Pedagogy; Legal research; Law; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02065842000691434,"score_gpt":0.3439022046017505,"score_spread":0.32324378459483616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270082067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1966942,0.00016100668,0.00072400045,0.04722653,0.0016064795,0.0004393884,0.000009998698,0.00010126603,0.75303715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99111253,0.000023581715,0.002274113,0.0015548845,0.00059967226,0.000045070425,0.000008416353,0.00000972822,0.004372026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989493,0.0001181419,0.00024347131,0.00016794249,0.00031815795,0.00020300572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926144,0.00011954397,0.00010758694,0.00021405001,0.00020243246,0.00009494762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054869684,0.00008130613,0.00010950824,0.00006800084,0.00035381233,0.00032785963,0.00021766488,0.00007441227,0.0006225355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009571917,0.00007860948,0.00005701219,0.0005826925,0.0004769183,0.0017799078,0.000025869002,0.00029787226,0.000100598816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009398212,0.00019168467,0.0002621609,0.0000098510145,0.000008914529,5.8947126e-7,0.0030302657,0.000009191955,0.00014144716,0.99451876,0.0014023593,0.0004154015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025153096,0.00004006415,0.00067439507,0.00006805895,0.000020034196,0.000004864091,0.009692254,0.0000011929742,0.0009919185,0.076144606,0.9119284,0.00018264838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033789326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004171202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9183741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016108836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004859951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97264475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270632766","doi":"10.7202/1105802ar","title":"APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER TO UNIVERSITIES’ LIMITATION OF EXPRESSION","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Academic freedom; Law; Point (geometry); Economic Justice; Political science; Action (physics); Sociology; Law and economics; Higher education; Computer science; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.024489076058810472,"score_gpt":0.2769676591945084,"score_spread":0.25247858313569793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270632766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6556493,0.00040013643,0.013189883,0.07173117,0.00080249377,0.00056654465,0.00004618308,0.000029421806,0.25758487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8908347,0.00005110265,0.0014728649,0.00041735178,0.00014824158,0.0000025864294,0.0000098180435,0.000009017931,0.10705434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911505,0.0001772508,0.00017627567,0.00013842613,0.00021570554,0.00017729956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987959,0.00013486894,0.00026846092,0.0002509168,0.00039569533,0.00015410359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004471096,0.00007467445,0.00011743227,0.00010592768,0.00018735632,0.00001350936,0.00032187995,0.00014122705,0.00013210684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011959493,0.00008709853,0.00007365127,0.0009147976,0.0001704933,0.00041126573,0.00007834222,0.00016325447,0.00005849188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000855807,0.00020269725,0.0060506393,0.00015223255,0.000034309338,0.000001745974,0.15876186,0.0018537352,0.014690042,0.79993516,0.013521208,0.0047107716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031811383,0.000057926954,0.0070740976,0.00019728496,0.00008593249,0.0000051724414,0.038648296,0.00065118365,0.00757813,0.0022120061,0.9430485,0.00012339013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002611637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005033826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9295273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021431434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008984861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5604245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270837153","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.829944","title":"The Spider, the Bee, the Snail and the Camel: Legal Knowledge, Practise, Culture, Institutions and Power in a Changing World","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Spider; Snail; Power (physics); Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.020473285356071052,"score_gpt":0.3567948239007073,"score_spread":0.33632153854463626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270837153","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021256482,0.02779684,0.00021091117,0.7827286,0.0005825588,0.0005234383,0.000001109324,0.000022468912,0.16687761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9552054,0.010475531,0.000017027014,0.001895293,0.00072097965,0.00003487167,3.6657545e-7,0.00000682324,0.031643715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977637,0.0006728777,0.00023974743,0.00011705177,0.00023888986,0.00096773263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847066,0.0009986402,0.00020141745,0.00013187583,0.00015000235,0.000047390975],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008106341,0.00010033919,0.00008722453,0.00014473802,0.0056199133,0.00092480925,0.00034998733,0.00004252964,0.00002885415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014667052,0.000042193195,0.00004496648,0.0016277288,0.00081656367,0.00090425764,0.00005040146,0.0029951695,0.000012779586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019654964,0.00003700098,0.00013841782,3.61496e-7,0.000034050117,2.256665e-7,0.02561909,0.0000049504806,0.0000019104525,0.9568627,0.002907148,0.014374479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037539128,0.000016599139,0.00045438958,0.000008504505,0.000026109457,0.00011346269,0.06055202,0.0000323636,0.000001599188,0.030457357,0.90789706,0.00006516529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015151058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23912963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93394893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003914988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046586003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271463290","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1214","title":"Book Review: The New Lawyer: How Settlement is Transforming the Practice of Law, by Julie Macfarlane","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Settlement (finance); Political science; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.033049956485663085,"score_gpt":0.3513677939636854,"score_spread":0.31831783747802234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271463290","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002213617,0.035110954,0.00016682851,0.5610456,0.00022823202,0.00019126825,0.00001219544,0.000008706143,0.40323403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08811879,0.27418348,0.0010825737,0.59852946,0.0012697701,0.00002413682,0.000017028424,0.000028050095,0.03674671],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793684,0.0005190062,0.00037912634,0.00011769728,0.0007763438,0.00027099732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820936,0.00055686914,0.00051134854,0.00022922107,0.00035687804,0.00013631956],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022063532,0.00011093461,0.00015434167,0.000016912843,0.0026472642,0.00023470094,0.00047809648,0.000056916386,0.0029192157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044219405,0.00006668226,0.00011152228,0.00026347284,0.00035811562,0.0015265411,0.00001718267,0.00081482454,0.000048943355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006759599,0.000047483623,0.000002719317,0.000009430426,0.00003617169,0.000002529071,0.007930062,5.5694386e-7,0.000024970275,0.29493424,0.6961436,0.00086141535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018698956,0.000030870306,0.0000022617037,0.00008246526,0.00009646422,0.00018477853,0.002302296,0.0000011873504,0.00025463125,0.0017517433,0.9950179,0.00008844709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03441805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009806317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36648732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007761339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064710045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99865115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271561690","doi":"","title":"The Changing Social Role of Urban Law Schools","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.009474036657334628,"score_gpt":0.30996466354972746,"score_spread":0.3004906268923928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271561690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17069842,0.0054504736,0.00082578725,0.22382891,0.0010958443,0.00029184524,0.0000032887115,0.00007396575,0.5977315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913008,0.00026734185,0.000020115018,0.00015577125,0.0015457243,0.0000032357293,0.0000010730809,0.00000558299,0.0067003123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983215,0.00015880496,0.00018312302,0.000054340202,0.0002681691,0.0010140808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944127,0.00009623499,0.00020241873,0.000051931616,0.00018483598,0.00002330942],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029854134,0.000045283905,0.000056368513,0.0000551956,0.0025423917,0.0001954374,0.00020849193,0.000042838437,0.000037402406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014481472,0.000035629062,0.000054505243,0.00044284356,0.00011757722,0.00039268294,0.000009808337,0.0014530331,0.000018520906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004679843,0.00002142042,0.0003684984,2.6796118e-7,0.0000148606405,4.6736844e-8,0.0029187133,8.6133224e-7,0.000112314876,0.9919404,0.0010813581,0.0035366204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076552686,0.00001280196,0.0001620532,0.000001914641,0.000008318444,0.000004209211,0.056339335,0.0000021054186,0.000053680822,0.487361,0.4559373,0.000040709467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050249514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019821128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8206024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041123817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004545166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271715383","doi":"","title":"Citations to Wikipedia in Canadian Law Journal and Law Review Articles","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal research; Citation; Information literacy; Law; Political science; Citation analysis; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04487783406451451,"score_gpt":0.37980119516322114,"score_spread":0.33492336109870663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271715383","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058243997,0.019440373,0.00020951382,0.69551384,0.00093629165,0.00037542655,0.0000035953503,0.00002191437,0.22525504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802706,0.007851977,0.00023703165,0.010517892,0.00038874714,0.0000056155536,0.0000010400698,0.000006764502,0.00072032755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794805,0.00027271465,0.00025508148,0.00008157884,0.00026668602,0.0011758901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873996,0.000084554646,0.000094948766,0.00006248014,0.00036373985,0.0006542894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062292707,0.00006154136,0.00009471112,0.00016239859,0.00081015984,0.00031933474,0.00015375628,0.00004018127,0.00008531988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014400183,0.000059282556,0.000022823393,0.00067229196,0.00008588171,0.00088922464,0.0000076159567,0.0014843611,0.00006139971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002613088,0.000015740123,0.0007689238,0.0000022278887,0.0000086594555,0.0000022612587,0.0043246453,0.0000022951401,0.0000026747873,0.98798186,0.003646782,0.0032413423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015616642,0.0000475512,0.00021414654,0.00006765278,0.000014433042,0.0001431171,0.015244804,0.000001523675,9.4210725e-7,0.26453847,0.71948856,0.00008262363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6484346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99330854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92202663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015707682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017145533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272655456","doi":"","title":"Back to Basics? University Legal Education and 21st Century Professionalism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Curriculum; Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Legal profession; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.029028857513419642,"score_gpt":0.3322947306734505,"score_spread":0.30326587316003084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272655456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1267204,0.00011575966,0.00002323938,0.111030884,0.0015264717,0.0002944403,0.000008351813,0.000044107725,0.7602363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81593233,0.0001979231,0.0015634358,0.009857099,0.00062884734,0.0000065636164,0.00002620062,0.000009457579,0.17177814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907595,0.00019445669,0.000114729846,0.00019934877,0.00021665794,0.0001988302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992054,0.00009315336,0.00006777118,0.00015325707,0.00023364788,0.00024674015],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036152138,0.00007496448,0.000072980205,0.00007201642,0.00084387825,0.00021199306,0.00016442039,0.000081600454,0.003666818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025572765,0.000082282146,0.00002257104,0.000635709,0.00010520893,0.0013333836,0.000040851606,0.00025733424,0.0010530237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014512884,0.00014103812,0.0032956845,0.0000042128927,0.0000055645723,0.0000010342114,0.0032929806,7.454945e-7,0.000034462446,0.95694005,0.031915568,0.0043541607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010858585,0.000009197472,0.0068434733,0.000020106168,0.000007036808,0.0000026206346,0.018092906,6.53836e-7,0.000007639412,0.0007473919,0.9740517,0.00010870466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017487163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008627009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9561927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016335568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012513277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273347576","doi":"","title":"Feminists, Angels, Poets, and Revolutionaries: What I've Learned from Ruthann Robson and Nicole Brossard on What it Means to Be a Law Teacher","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.060006420201950614,"score_gpt":0.3428974027585497,"score_spread":0.28289098255659906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273347576","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17456783,0.0049555167,0.000032797183,0.71855253,0.0011080449,0.0007001493,0.00006741365,0.00017748294,0.09983821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87510735,0.0033627765,0.0043873307,0.08104985,0.0018206807,0.00011583686,0.0001098493,0.000046015553,0.034000326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979903,0.00030202477,0.00031001167,0.0005201959,0.0004854968,0.00039197635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984146,0.00042153188,0.00013734205,0.00042852754,0.00018280944,0.00041524123],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008685871,0.00019970296,0.00022283867,0.000068606736,0.0012417145,0.0028453555,0.00028614892,0.0002178993,0.0016636181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010098328,0.00020859049,0.00004637163,0.00039978145,0.0003771812,0.0050337086,0.000099123194,0.0005402998,0.00034620223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016911863,0.00044594097,0.0010325355,0.000017639173,0.00009023168,0.000004723689,0.104730435,0.000025897729,0.0003781655,0.6657612,0.20394093,0.02340323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034950313,0.000063366104,0.0006642112,0.000117780204,0.000027323058,0.0000014648205,0.053968742,0.000013179952,0.000118201446,0.0035726505,0.94084644,0.0002571369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017414857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06262557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7369055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024702746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003181546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274205176","doi":"","title":"Clinical Legal Education: A (Brief) Comparison of the Evolving Structures and Pedagogy in Mexico, Canada and the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Pedagogy; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04197700472240273,"score_gpt":0.45058393880165637,"score_spread":0.40860693407925364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274205176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8271119,0.00011694953,0.000031198568,0.13950196,0.00055127504,0.0001595504,0.0000014249986,0.000005477857,0.032520264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945177,0.000030538893,0.00016833641,0.0041852985,0.000084194675,0.000004138481,0.0000031405552,0.0000020052948,0.0010046384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877894,0.0006334241,0.0002596199,0.000084414285,0.0001600897,0.00008348467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979096,0.001645105,0.00013919004,0.000109821565,0.00015738119,0.000038887836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010336257,0.000041715288,0.0001019588,0.000032806307,0.0003056813,0.00010079996,0.00012331852,0.00003292471,0.00013426947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025386454,0.000023656386,0.000010689768,0.000362264,0.00046622602,0.00014980235,0.000028312403,0.00022314332,1.392247e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009002105,0.000025836758,0.3196276,0.0000035565097,0.0000054615844,1.0876544e-8,0.0137190595,0.000015620686,4.529112e-7,0.647846,0.01499397,0.003753402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025934138,0.000007112539,0.31965828,0.000006351076,0.000009493259,5.6477853e-7,0.045275647,0.0010127869,0.000005435644,0.0055143316,0.6282047,0.00004597878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9655526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97967356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64233166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002719617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024587407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43617007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274565570","doi":"10.14288/1.0055094","title":"The impact of computer aided drafting technology on industrial education curriculum in British Columbia secondary schools","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Mathematics education; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Engineering management; Pedagogy; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0116121521349934,"score_gpt":0.2624846110366459,"score_spread":0.2508724589016525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274565570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900782,0.000019906664,0.0000069066723,0.0021232432,0.0008491318,0.00036179653,0.000047575828,0.00004069348,0.0064725233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984599,0.00003707914,0.00034671175,0.000045519882,0.00017645616,0.0000020912785,0.000014789506,0.000007024519,0.00091043033],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890614,0.00016022539,0.00021510305,0.00023706775,0.00023593452,0.00024552175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986763,0.0001817897,0.00032207117,0.00021913093,0.00051445584,0.00008623547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075656036,0.000032064832,0.00017583538,0.000087539884,0.0008908728,0.0006609921,0.0004507224,0.00026300215,0.0004781569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007910584,0.00010931678,0.00008845958,0.0012660614,0.0005414835,0.0007139636,0.00006606566,0.0010875908,0.000011906059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028012669,0.0003254459,0.26914352,0.0000047648527,0.000018829476,0.0000050704166,0.0006158196,0.0000017732675,0.00006270167,0.00006590027,0.029690005,0.70006335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005506329,0.00007260611,0.97480774,0.00011155535,0.000009005835,0.000014810866,0.012955279,0.00002587451,3.0521326e-7,0.000973089,0.010362838,0.000116235984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9370121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9815286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7056642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016638682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034029575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68519634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275482756","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4417","title":"THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE: LESSONS FROM LAWYER-LICENSING REFORM","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Humanities; Law; Legal profession; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07006859944101311,"score_gpt":0.39852298376303613,"score_spread":0.328454384322023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275482756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47963616,0.00016067293,0.00013395073,0.3534934,0.0015966215,0.0009817382,0.00008523168,0.0000426417,0.16386957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838734,0.00009212897,0.0014618922,0.012290318,0.00046593545,0.000032889016,0.0000052313176,0.000017088518,0.0017610703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984625,0.000094002295,0.00036561937,0.0002378292,0.00051952776,0.00032049458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975972,0.00090236077,0.00024848682,0.00032614364,0.00070341607,0.0002223733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049888436,0.000121898855,0.00018534262,0.00003635097,0.00086091313,0.00071457936,0.00078070624,0.00008682104,0.00035175856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007123408,0.00009968966,0.000040231185,0.0005935842,0.0002399173,0.0015748289,0.00025475622,0.00025399533,0.000021112019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013161487,0.0002777994,0.0072133928,0.0004635577,0.00033621193,0.0000018600011,0.075057216,0.00022353246,0.004185938,0.2720347,0.61722875,0.022845445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028182074,0.000031756805,0.0961797,0.00014401966,0.00039674228,6.583698e-7,0.059051983,0.00009983468,0.002054878,0.0010824668,0.840311,0.00036512432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94341016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74902856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5042373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021344707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013770883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6890705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276365490","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2637480","title":"Law Without Lawyers: Judges and Justice System Design in the Twenty-First Century","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.04781145153785148,"score_gpt":0.3414997358758184,"score_spread":0.2936882843379669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276365490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10603683,0.014145025,0.01094619,0.3813585,0.0045624725,0.0015762806,0.0000038254652,0.00019646366,0.4811744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99671584,0.00119678,0.0001718274,0.00091150356,0.000545078,0.000009144099,7.972217e-7,0.0000068763284,0.00044213614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977808,0.0007323336,0.00018709362,0.000103781946,0.00035407298,0.0008419048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992179,0.00029753605,0.000140041,0.000094878764,0.0001619964,0.00008762636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085780695,0.00007386844,0.00008532721,0.00006649826,0.0008222994,0.00038340653,0.00025473486,0.000057722875,0.0000100784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055037905,0.00005364174,0.000019590654,0.00038433468,0.00012264184,0.0007105775,0.000011598317,0.0014204814,0.000026992127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018777253,0.000038070066,0.0007836772,0.000005118483,0.0000141668215,0.0000014356141,0.021015685,0.000018235913,0.0000012764298,0.97666514,0.0009159212,0.0005225094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005368486,0.000099812016,0.0001851538,0.000026073203,0.00009209747,0.00020153339,0.5773012,0.00004975487,0.0000017774637,0.047282405,0.37409285,0.00013049613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003920493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027934369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92938274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009316663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043241302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276639011","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2205830","title":"Response to Ministry of Justice Consultation Paper 'Judicial Review: Proposals for Reform'","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Economic Justice; Political science; Judicial reform; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.0215169845892325,"score_gpt":0.3831318220319755,"score_spread":0.361614837442743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276639011","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10986213,0.003515287,0.003523198,0.85581136,0.0010575987,0.002197946,0.000013336632,0.000041460873,0.023977667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611435,0.008248261,0.0018663247,0.0105639575,0.00075705955,0.00017331123,0.000008711381,0.00001881942,0.017220046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981506,0.00032312673,0.00038826186,0.00010264075,0.00028656947,0.00074879715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789,0.0004781377,0.0002967399,0.00009717566,0.0011450781,0.00009288473],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057455655,0.00006792683,0.00012808524,0.000084672436,0.00049026136,0.00007522639,0.0001866969,0.00005997285,0.00033211976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008953236,0.000059240887,0.00005434081,0.00046959912,0.00007267118,0.00070942636,0.000008307997,0.00062579836,0.000081120954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058995426,0.0001806591,0.0000471966,0.000113253715,0.00008656033,2.5858654e-7,0.009980709,0.0000016375368,0.0072326697,0.87550294,0.0632062,0.043057945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048845576,0.0003858114,0.00030427825,0.0001609833,0.0001249753,0.000024066718,0.052555993,0.000003106502,0.00017007742,0.0798725,0.86574984,0.00015992713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014669357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012391796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8512814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007487261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011446264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278379828","doi":"","title":"The Future of Online Legal Journalism: The Courts Speak Only Through Their Opinions?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hyperbole; Journalism; Supreme court; Law; Media studies; Dream; Political science; The Internet; Dystopia; History; Sociology; Metaphor","score_opus":0.028812610485731683,"score_gpt":0.30327538079414645,"score_spread":0.27446277030841476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278379828","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045732614,0.0009825788,0.00017666144,0.6056853,0.0023829462,0.000745287,0.000052098352,0.000058546146,0.34418398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86745524,0.0036592355,0.000083093306,0.0012024855,0.0016022862,0.0000030886958,0.000017970806,0.00002049482,0.12595613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978533,0.0011298677,0.00024064985,0.00014826398,0.00029061426,0.00033734218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669415,0.0015681623,0.00034256195,0.0005376598,0.0007906827,0.00006680674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012179882,0.00014771878,0.00013644897,0.00005667609,0.0040048566,0.0003368128,0.0015914799,0.00006361182,0.00069206225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020608558,0.000065592365,0.00012485324,0.0012735907,0.0011072793,0.0009681141,0.00015720575,0.00074644136,0.00021098698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024700452,0.00014073878,0.00005156868,0.0000033401532,0.000097503544,8.9901863e-7,0.07405042,0.000016979417,0.000017866028,0.8296607,0.074208915,0.021726364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016412913,0.000019578409,0.0026815445,0.000012270498,0.000036545804,0.0000046652995,0.08119241,0.000037155696,0.0000165169,0.008043195,0.90770185,0.000090130365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026834458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013874943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83349293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013770691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015501549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278559094","doi":"","title":"Taking Responsibility: Mandatory Legal Ethics in Canadian Law Schools","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Legal ethics; Political science; Legal profession; Legal education; Law","score_opus":0.0429138171843332,"score_gpt":0.4115984368368675,"score_spread":0.3686846196525343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278559094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30219445,0.0007990734,0.0007816279,0.22316398,0.0013815169,0.0002598948,0.0000027609449,0.000046419846,0.4713703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99253064,0.00031408112,0.00012158506,0.003604211,0.0004907534,0.0000017187413,0.0000018191483,0.000009301938,0.0029258719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962911,0.000516217,0.00031798548,0.00014346614,0.00040122308,0.0023300343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987321,0.000412276,0.00017421567,0.00012700506,0.00026766513,0.00028677192],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034387197,0.00007619229,0.00008710099,0.00034795885,0.0013468015,0.0003123607,0.00025890276,0.00018965428,0.00025477653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049049654,0.00008230938,0.00003961788,0.00078720105,0.00012402544,0.0010890901,0.000009311978,0.009718661,0.000058737096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002275216,0.000021653084,0.006494506,9.2178163e-7,0.000010344419,0.000008208556,0.0043549095,0.000001859762,0.000018639636,0.9855085,0.00012805194,0.0034296655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018293606,0.000028793942,0.00490844,0.000014676057,0.0000060021666,0.000046426172,0.03498301,0.0000015808392,0.00001211757,0.1619847,0.79771197,0.00011933401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8875012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82352376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057656677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091503225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279541649","doi":"","title":"Generalist Judges, Technical Expertise, and the Standard of Review: A Presentation by Justice Marshall Rothstein of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Presentation (obstetrics); Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.018759514937994604,"score_gpt":0.30986420318500907,"score_spread":0.29110468824701446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279541649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1012248,0.017376248,0.00058620493,0.6669749,0.0015787553,0.0030765194,0.00037896057,0.000045254375,0.20875835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929486,0.0009163728,0.00040776032,0.003772273,0.000091550086,0.000036942576,0.000008192716,0.0000063470598,0.001811984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829245,0.00058163103,0.00037337875,0.00010741311,0.0005294111,0.00011573114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848056,0.00045846243,0.00035163018,0.0002746847,0.00037646937,0.000058217873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015143715,0.000062968626,0.00018820712,0.000011375463,0.00024858472,0.00002883172,0.00028144856,0.000044207965,0.00023289464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003152865,0.000040870746,0.000036386064,0.00029544742,0.0005908157,0.00019564996,0.000039653594,0.00016671325,5.44656e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064165106,0.00004598791,0.0010813272,0.00024408479,0.000021237733,7.374515e-8,0.001280362,0.000008029256,0.0015551395,0.49605352,0.4991976,0.00044847556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050394546,0.000026895126,0.0011478808,0.00017254829,0.00010214008,7.624609e-7,0.0012121444,0.00002250845,0.0017265696,0.0009365545,0.9940657,0.00008232858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51086366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6086722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89172375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000785931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086303975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49239352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279968631","doi":"","title":"Liberal Arts and Professional Education: A Call for Philosopher-Servants","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections Canadian Journal of Music","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal arts education; The arts; Sociology; Media studies; Pedagogy; Political science; Visual arts; Management; Art; Higher education; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.04735761823137846,"score_gpt":0.3497705589858728,"score_spread":0.3024129407544943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279968631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65970194,0.00032368148,0.00035753546,0.20039073,0.014459775,0.00042935173,0.000033349635,0.00001675678,0.12428687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985751,0.000002775804,0.0010097713,0.001854857,0.0020807714,0.000017078006,0.0000050644517,0.0000072280186,0.009271493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933904,0.00005905769,0.00025256057,0.00007547921,0.00011110567,0.00016275843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988003,0.000117233714,0.00018348501,0.000056637466,0.00059551146,0.00024683317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003432481,0.00005736344,0.000078360885,0.00030462895,0.00072147785,0.00015045637,0.00009953842,0.00005881381,0.00056482997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031738993,0.000057597044,0.000050552597,0.00029169265,0.00012801144,0.0006126242,0.0000031510895,0.00022490326,0.0000069595217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022928803,0.00016360846,0.01215584,0.000012029095,0.000037519254,0.000004832834,0.02022442,0.000010889717,0.00006332627,0.19860189,0.76177424,0.0069284816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021126997,0.00004809482,0.014473707,0.00005609684,0.000024016657,0.00007267654,0.01219135,0.0000049767796,0.000008027415,0.018429583,0.95438915,0.00009103625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0696151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61903065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5494155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002011796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072753415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99835247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280006720","doi":"10.11575/prism/34132","title":"No Right to Silence During Employer Investigations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Boss; Dignity; Public relations; Silence; Business; Right to know; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.017114049661116043,"score_gpt":0.26972544723811176,"score_spread":0.2526113975769957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280006720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7045009,0.0000026003445,0.0035078067,0.023724884,0.00043389204,0.00013598175,3.8245767e-7,0.000055766894,0.2676378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8200484,0.000015049996,0.097650535,0.0006547625,0.00011037753,0.0000010600492,0.0000055764626,0.0000074441455,0.081506796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944717,0.00004838844,0.00006722303,0.00011774474,0.00019263211,0.00012683136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931705,0.000083584186,0.0000697675,0.00014860819,0.00022124522,0.000159752],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020984466,0.000042819796,0.000060668164,0.000116856376,0.00072475994,0.000031006504,0.0002523917,0.0000664413,0.0028586078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005335405,0.00005524947,0.000028932276,0.00041282977,0.00022533521,0.0006511928,0.000042930933,0.0002622547,0.00047897114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004804847,0.00039759948,0.03216611,0.0000400283,0.000059755028,0.00001852285,0.18178914,0.0000014172842,0.06265824,0.6242919,0.07496642,0.023562832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012039324,0.000009922795,0.045595825,0.000007914469,0.00001206562,4.9733416e-7,0.0009492399,0.000060961862,0.00044703996,0.0013980895,0.95129156,0.00010650095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011018719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013040663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87632513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003003429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040110608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281213616","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v26i2.14750","title":"COMMUNITY LEGAL WORKERS IN ONTARIO: A PARALEGAL CASE STUDY","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Legislation; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Political science; Community organization; Public administration; Community standards; Economic Justice; Community development; Public relations; Law; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.10086474531232464,"score_gpt":0.400237994083749,"score_spread":0.29937324877142435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281213616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8969836,0.000003039362,0.0000011920376,0.007227707,0.00046047714,0.00023008586,0.0000018357541,0.000022289598,0.095069736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96859753,8.3364405e-8,0.000054365522,0.0011893455,0.000033686916,0.00011259579,0.0000052967193,0.000004251215,0.030002829],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818707,0.0012132033,0.00014670622,0.000085392894,0.00021184448,0.00015577849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953103,0.00015984292,0.000051470022,0.00017716861,0.00003685379,0.000043662625],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015792325,0.000048860707,0.00006432917,0.00009725938,0.0015754293,0.00016713078,0.00016918534,0.000018416604,0.005703209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010785237,0.000054614007,0.000021094125,0.00057866174,0.000052686624,0.00052002387,0.00007825185,0.001244796,0.000029474004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001564187,0.0009095914,0.6690851,5.125155e-7,0.000007965745,0.00037824936,0.31557333,0.00002120729,0.0000011378676,0.0019697691,0.011677612,0.0003598667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001838231,0.00004036448,0.04884756,7.5164405e-7,0.0000040017976,0.00004558483,0.3989202,0.0000014789264,1.3496953e-7,0.000058665973,0.55184156,0.000055865192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9818266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6202375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004938248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011446831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282293003","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4414","title":"“FICTIONAL VISIONS”: AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL REFLECTIONS ON RE-READING THE ALCHEMY OF RACE AND RIGHTS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Alchemy; Vision; Narrative; Reading (process); Politics; Race (biology); Law; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Literature; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.08293260776188556,"score_gpt":0.43388478965345184,"score_spread":0.3509521818915663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282293003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3503329,0.000044281962,0.00039894975,0.14448307,0.0010146255,0.00089642406,0.000013668812,0.0000746694,0.5027414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558175,0.000022496504,0.0009324018,0.0011400565,0.00026197135,0.000039008366,0.000001946315,0.0000059663193,0.00201442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901724,0.00011173338,0.00024270109,0.00015701093,0.0003261488,0.00014518655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983419,0.00088355446,0.00015625857,0.00017983372,0.00034454488,0.00009386506],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049058074,0.000071125425,0.000107812346,0.00022037646,0.0006469563,0.00017551471,0.0002809845,0.000074883035,0.00093513576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074996817,0.000054093307,0.000038838363,0.00089888205,0.0002565666,0.0006880763,0.00004850376,0.000248451,0.000053469586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007344966,0.00048036757,0.0028934558,0.000050847357,0.000103677594,5.047181e-7,0.0262312,0.0001520979,0.0040442655,0.8556578,0.10791222,0.00240007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037229128,0.00017544496,0.13274589,0.0001523933,0.00026086214,0.000002544547,0.013492251,0.00012963539,0.0021389634,0.010612356,0.8396117,0.00030565265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051048268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004123497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8450455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028322444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018417047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282566548","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.006","title":"Can a modern legal system do without the trust?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.03455865241831211,"score_gpt":0.2582080142440429,"score_spread":0.22364936182573078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282566548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016138107,0.000060523438,0.00009669834,0.0025416939,0.0007242064,0.0006820911,0.00010648139,0.0001738925,0.99545306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0659376,0.000031575368,0.000040630985,0.00022759858,0.00045426792,0.0000035689645,0.000017215374,0.000027517583,0.93326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985906,0.00015958845,0.0001824406,0.0003343776,0.00045159407,0.0002814031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837446,0.00013806214,0.00033702937,0.0005115699,0.0004659143,0.0001729341],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003277288,0.00023058444,0.00023554577,0.00012355036,0.0013053393,0.00047745503,0.0007226319,0.0003208574,0.000049509163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048986894,0.00021287012,0.00013293461,0.000024052379,0.00051319064,0.00033437964,0.00012740974,0.0008341204,0.000086922504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000123995715,0.0000051534116,0.000002658512,0.000021779679,0.00007098246,0.000014013761,0.002767062,9.793658e-7,0.000002056545,0.9339143,0.06210963,0.0010789908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015587565,0.0000072981247,0.000008221349,0.000073606454,0.00015044739,0.000006261453,0.0029758068,0.000050696726,0.0000035666474,0.00004401681,0.9962684,0.00025579514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027129173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035656325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9341588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005655058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013759169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282642089","doi":"","title":"Doing Contract Theory in First Year Law School: The Iceberg Method","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université Laval; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Property (philosophy); Law; Identification (biology); Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Legal psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016508778511522403,"score_gpt":0.37124780099682003,"score_spread":0.35473902248529765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282642089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022384372,0.0019597155,0.075401925,0.14462103,0.0013990466,0.00039319636,0.000001094427,0.00006793057,0.75377166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913722,0.00073299947,0.0011325991,0.0017472057,0.00077208295,0.0000031949899,5.795405e-7,0.000009804158,0.004229285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755925,0.0005358278,0.0002602222,0.00010059339,0.00028532353,0.0012587758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981354,0.0013796812,0.00016993262,0.00010991006,0.00012458782,0.00008050732],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026018878,0.00006905884,0.00008140049,0.00009285932,0.0010657386,0.00023131295,0.00029739738,0.00007272295,0.00047554803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012524229,0.000051535262,0.000052702148,0.0005608957,0.00010338706,0.0006649772,0.000011853784,0.003150156,0.000111801724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029143943,0.00003524839,0.0010969477,4.663927e-7,0.000023551824,9.657999e-7,0.004207462,0.000007954894,0.000015988722,0.9840125,0.0001842726,0.010385536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023819903,0.00001995006,0.0011832108,0.000007639281,0.000012072817,0.000030676787,0.037938762,0.000002166505,0.00001666918,0.36402333,0.5964523,0.00007502051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065782685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23308232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9689879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009283213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00458474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284268404","doi":"","title":"Rethinking 'Like a Lawyer': An Incrementalist's Proposal for First Year Curriculum Reform","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Scholarship; Philosophy of law; Legal profession; Legal education; Curriculum; Competence (human resources); Practice of law; Sociology; Legal research; Subject (documents); Legal practice; Political science; Empirical legal studies; Legal ethics; Comparative law; Psychology","score_opus":0.025046641968533734,"score_gpt":0.34530723773431216,"score_spread":0.3202605957657784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284268404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38058734,0.0013813762,0.01712745,0.19966276,0.00695073,0.002705804,0.000018168492,0.00041953585,0.39114684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99106115,0.00045010372,0.0032612693,0.00047553214,0.0006354863,0.000026543805,0.000010734745,0.000018112278,0.0040610614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977974,0.00021674548,0.00024320264,0.00015324938,0.0003446871,0.001244679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922574,0.000050355997,0.00020807341,0.00011917155,0.00028784436,0.0001087986],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005444667,0.0000916905,0.00009341647,0.00008951821,0.00179623,0.000321615,0.00024288966,0.000088869456,0.00020442485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056161755,0.00008288412,0.000063990716,0.0003791393,0.000079829115,0.0012420325,0.000008450418,0.0014130592,0.000026097576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009884567,0.000108433305,0.0010659941,0.000002657197,0.000027141232,2.3551196e-7,0.005490927,0.000001072595,0.000018143131,0.99210095,0.0006070179,0.0005675424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038214377,0.00016925001,0.000033121818,0.000009814025,0.00002300383,0.00003139822,0.056105837,0.000009220453,0.00002892693,0.5545049,0.3885636,0.00013879589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039082007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10336175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6104738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023280862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011666419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284435770","doi":"10.14288/1.0055741","title":"Sacrificing intellectual excellence to administrative and political convenience in British Columbia public schools : departmental examinations re-examined","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Politics; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03314527652837747,"score_gpt":0.2835999841779292,"score_spread":0.25045470764955174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284435770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827948,0.000012466294,0.0001875631,0.0042411727,0.00025409702,0.00041052306,0.000106973595,0.000046243902,0.011946169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962313,0.000029052355,0.0011743624,0.00021530422,0.000048649992,0.000004415054,0.000016978502,0.0000073813544,0.0022725135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985058,0.00019224356,0.00019396185,0.00039241894,0.00031629895,0.00039933363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984499,0.0005093998,0.00009872487,0.0001564526,0.0004111185,0.00037437366],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006777441,0.000038323535,0.00017329538,0.00007870123,0.00094758696,0.001168005,0.00030320516,0.00012921065,0.0012605874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003166075,0.00016654536,0.00003433714,0.0009931589,0.0007873493,0.0012514865,0.000090549736,0.0004878134,0.000023951232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001607028,0.0014898431,0.53570974,0.00006277719,0.00005260708,0.0002665478,0.032755673,5.674767e-7,0.0013671997,0.0026539073,0.027088793,0.39853626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032107224,0.00007631302,0.88166696,0.000056841247,0.000009168343,0.000036696096,0.10775023,0.000021462833,0.0000012745485,0.00033710073,0.0095519405,0.00017091347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8114391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39836538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016432202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011118094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284517968","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Case Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal research; Political science","score_opus":0.4299321490574306,"score_gpt":0.5795687673692017,"score_spread":0.1496366183117711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284517968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012014148,0.00014225917,7.037606e-7,0.2769479,0.0035461045,0.0005143074,0.00010877464,0.00007268117,0.7185471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059385873,0.00028368758,0.0010145339,0.006540576,0.008312062,0.00016032446,0.00021100073,0.00006318814,0.92402875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920255,0.002836414,0.0005103225,0.00059414346,0.0023379063,0.0016956929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98754686,0.003945145,0.00010429337,0.0008982439,0.006314761,0.0011906849],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026666261,0.00019404618,0.00023490482,0.0019495918,0.009044805,0.003709535,0.0012371368,0.001299658,0.029021006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015687741,0.00019248696,0.000084063824,0.003695389,0.0027378213,0.001519009,0.00013958875,0.010242107,0.003565207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011091187,0.000019664414,0.0000023051161,0.000007808475,0.000009092462,0.0003806386,0.0034564058,4.021701e-8,9.967544e-7,0.47497556,0.5204993,0.000647091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049969934,0.000022487455,0.0000022871282,0.000029006838,0.000006835214,0.00010834164,0.03775554,0.0000010330999,0.000009171828,0.00761728,0.9541759,0.00022217211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4673583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012733275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05157356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285289780","doi":"","title":"Promises and Challenges of Achieving Racial Equality in Legal Education in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Political science; Legal education; Division (mathematics); Racial equality; Law; Public administration; Library science; Racism; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.049065674968323564,"score_gpt":0.3463874808170077,"score_spread":0.2973218058486842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285289780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96376204,0.00027027374,8.732291e-7,0.0042149853,0.00028538462,0.00011357154,5.564972e-7,0.0000042825027,0.031348046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997838,0.00032841245,0.00011456142,0.0000035373555,0.00010781928,5.550454e-7,0.0000011671854,0.000002273152,0.0016036542],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986791,0.000588552,0.00011077569,0.00014341583,0.00032573717,0.00015243328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989358,0.0005136231,0.00009693226,0.000076606724,0.0002930699,0.000083923725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001738042,0.000039230297,0.00010202948,0.0001784369,0.0004541536,0.000037613703,0.00011596209,0.000065095795,0.000045541856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010355171,0.00005029869,0.000008657909,0.00033364535,0.0002510322,0.00047956101,0.00004311192,0.00080946635,4.92916e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016887703,0.00030996677,0.8016594,0.0002185303,0.000015657944,0.0000091608945,0.106213465,0.000007087327,0.008506095,0.054258708,0.0002727255,0.028360322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024654932,0.000056885492,0.6540442,0.00005560981,0.000002845611,0.0000012885167,0.15241708,0.000024243975,0.00007190052,0.00017162047,0.1928316,0.00007616051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93555945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95568204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19255888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015605579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064200424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285389918","doi":"","title":"Magic circle holds back tide of mergers -- for now","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Lawyer","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"MAGIC (telescope); Revenue; Mergers and acquisitions; Law; History; Political science; Economy; Economic history; Business; Economics; Accounting; Physics","score_opus":0.04654580909293181,"score_gpt":0.3748581178393734,"score_spread":0.3283123087464416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285389918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056625117,0.000021752263,0.0011339046,0.20785393,0.0008892846,0.00026746545,0.0000072202793,0.000025891657,0.73317546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97256845,0.00000913613,0.0005355447,0.0021263221,0.00025887808,0.000008638511,0.0000029722446,0.000004676612,0.024485378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995317,0.00009684443,0.00009773138,0.000057488338,0.00011078629,0.00010548402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992498,0.0003901398,0.000074854936,0.00013855692,0.00012221203,0.000024449739],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093652925,0.000028104552,0.000051494982,0.000016987542,0.00018798451,0.000033187956,0.00015351843,0.00002708575,0.0010690233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044422163,0.000022196224,0.000031354208,0.00020540298,0.00012878372,0.00016848318,0.0000076160068,0.00006285337,0.00037950595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001282485,0.000062727224,0.0006140573,0.0000122995525,0.00001812585,1.9068816e-8,0.012496313,0.000021313648,0.001011563,0.715916,0.26264957,0.0071852067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082248815,0.000009402231,0.0014397231,0.0000026420032,0.000009181362,5.979842e-8,0.00097511464,0.0000339654,0.0003694718,0.00892409,0.9881178,0.000036256795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001243664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009468357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9159433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012793517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001085324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286131691","doi":"10.29173/alr1284","title":"Dispute Resolution, Access to Civil Justice and Legal Education","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Center for Information Technology; University of Alberta; Government of Canada","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Dispute mechanism; Public administration; Law; Public relations; Geography","score_opus":0.04797087079497804,"score_gpt":0.4305722129150825,"score_spread":0.3826013421201045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286131691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040750523,0.009669522,0.000046866015,0.4882042,0.00046048063,0.00040590376,0.0000011507889,0.000019074683,0.5007853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41295615,0.062702656,0.0028537698,0.42468202,0.00286927,0.00040122736,0.000055236018,0.000031863812,0.093447834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990352,0.0001752898,0.00024232917,0.00019100924,0.00018219875,0.00017402087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989785,0.00031187787,0.00010237843,0.00020286106,0.00023937692,0.00016501646],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006100282,0.00007800925,0.00012024979,0.00003471625,0.00059084577,0.00035311127,0.00022572876,0.000038306236,0.0009656529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018767684,0.0000751011,0.00002608668,0.0006545733,0.000077695935,0.0019415478,0.000042238866,0.00013515232,0.00042848522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001072669,0.000050220962,0.00003750295,0.0001501952,0.0000038354374,5.0551396e-8,0.0006869551,5.864715e-7,0.000001026615,0.7705643,0.20391849,0.024585726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029119507,0.0000054300153,0.00040038946,0.0003598365,0.000098789904,0.0000032214825,0.000109409,0.0000023077152,0.0000018154452,0.00021193868,0.9986756,0.00010213961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047396947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16998589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7947571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008010467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000719367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286285386","doi":"10.7202/1100323ar","title":"THE NIGHTMARE OF LITIGATING IN MULTIPLE FORA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nightmare; History; Political science; Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.04204732850382038,"score_gpt":0.34952384025425437,"score_spread":0.307476511750434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286285386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6342201,0.000021626713,0.000078628465,0.0695437,0.0010393406,0.00018206092,0.000023818191,0.00006677505,0.2948239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99270743,0.000055979664,0.0001656062,0.00023638332,0.0002552459,0.000033646327,0.000027027427,0.0000057361617,0.0065129506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925613,0.000076407436,0.0002274383,0.00008636002,0.00020157137,0.00015211687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985859,0.0009632667,0.00012675853,0.000094452516,0.00019581131,0.000033845587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009924432,0.000037100646,0.000053592095,0.00011817306,0.00023077938,0.00008124361,0.00028412545,0.00003961654,0.00014320138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033125083,0.000036814083,0.00003802948,0.00057595,0.00008538634,0.0002492915,0.000018726634,0.00016007505,0.000065649896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091858055,0.00003316087,0.024077976,0.000005418419,0.0000123597365,0.000002830949,0.017025843,0.000090494985,0.00013570939,0.9482713,0.0028895866,0.0074461387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001777549,0.000007300917,0.030776007,0.00005150689,0.000003176555,0.000002205984,0.012571914,0.003072212,0.00010206051,0.057920784,0.89523286,0.00008219696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012372892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044981956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8923433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000197571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005104542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286572463","doi":"10.14288/1.0099115","title":"The records of lawyers : archival appraisal and access","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.022150634350634253,"score_gpt":0.2957925614677686,"score_spread":0.27364192711713436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286572463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9068991,0.000032627893,0.00007020377,0.010592638,0.00020038545,0.000089543144,0.000014856914,0.000017464552,0.08208321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979865,0.00026527938,0.00019278673,0.00007367242,0.00003471885,9.687103e-8,0.0000021037247,0.0000015803629,0.0014432425],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946874,0.00009221556,0.00006958117,0.00009989807,0.00016228776,0.00010729993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932235,0.00026695777,0.00011215474,0.00009303966,0.00015213931,0.000053352534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037561444,0.000013772204,0.00007079031,0.00001929667,0.00065724744,0.00020087165,0.00026538176,0.000029949822,0.000054725173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029973645,0.00003988785,0.000028716504,0.00031033074,0.0004860558,0.00061136833,0.000030465493,0.00010758722,0.0000018529164],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069552984,0.000066765046,0.0075637335,0.000004856499,0.000009163825,0.0000022300108,0.0029589538,4.4762157e-7,0.000020500602,0.0012512048,0.011450563,0.9766646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001398857,0.000028238768,0.9334276,0.000013616685,0.000009248081,0.0000022437182,0.008762512,0.0000067060923,2.0056422e-7,0.0022815117,0.055283427,0.00004485574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2602368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4683488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9766198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016494723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026149538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74468935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286924852","doi":"","title":"Skills Training in Clinical Legal Education: A Critical Approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Vision; Critical reflection; Legal practice; Legal profession; Politics; Legal research; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Empirical legal studies; Clinical Practice; Pedagogy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Law; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.08471902032025673,"score_gpt":0.4390076041773598,"score_spread":0.35428858385710305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286924852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06224153,0.00068631856,0.0058286665,0.03535366,0.0030206235,0.00023733666,7.8329424e-7,0.000057029887,0.8925741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988422,0.00058345136,0.0029329902,0.0010431428,0.0014323303,0.000015401833,0.0000017927215,0.0000106803855,0.0055582304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970729,0.00059968466,0.00050627236,0.00018047048,0.00027892535,0.0013617707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907315,0.00028424192,0.00013876113,0.00011594042,0.0002282609,0.00015966086],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007954248,0.000085299565,0.00014106778,0.00017264792,0.0004754434,0.00016073609,0.00030206473,0.00012693081,0.00039750396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034732288,0.000084600484,0.00008541858,0.0005978426,0.00024387434,0.0011170954,0.000012732586,0.0036952102,0.000058163565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011470816,0.0005819636,0.0036713558,0.000001076666,0.000014266034,8.181209e-7,0.021002991,1.7382824e-7,5.2038615e-7,0.92488384,0.00039046895,0.049441025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033470194,0.00012358885,0.0066720094,0.000017437142,0.000025221074,0.00019886623,0.22655545,0.0000079330075,0.0000012118826,0.5572778,0.2085751,0.00021069018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022676548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005651471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9261804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056789815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048239812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287613873","doi":"10.1017/s1472669615000444","title":"The ‘Free Access to Law Movement’ in India: Supporting Legal Education, Research and Practice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Legal research; Promotion (chess); The Internet; Legislature; Public administration; Scholarship; Declaration; Public relations","score_opus":0.10613310999783904,"score_gpt":0.49179817023861355,"score_spread":0.3856650602407745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287613873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012125722,0.000017528895,0.00020573566,0.26986006,0.0005553434,0.0007877738,0.000001770207,0.000028455812,0.72733074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89055455,0.00013242614,0.0048934603,0.07636403,0.00045576532,0.0008415924,0.000053947635,0.000014123701,0.026690109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977898,0.00034826357,0.0004789391,0.00012395172,0.00089634303,0.0003626914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779874,0.00047828635,0.00021057705,0.00030563382,0.0010255633,0.00018120123],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00903375,0.000076832766,0.000064742366,0.0003618406,0.0010877802,0.0048384,0.00058526016,0.00004460362,0.000038221806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00458818,0.00006889537,0.000010903826,0.0016409757,0.00015628472,0.017037697,0.00034959975,0.00035655836,0.000171134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026275897,0.000057720867,0.00013449311,0.000009046454,0.000007848274,6.5943453e-7,0.014777016,0.000017279352,2.1025282e-7,0.79820204,0.1742996,0.0124678165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017876817,0.000020787387,0.0017882228,0.000010922343,0.000004015569,8.856356e-7,0.124385096,0.000010317627,0.0000040535656,0.011954112,0.8615695,0.00007331583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033123177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006925409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88934195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038348773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093835755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287653972","doi":"","title":"Fitness for Purpose: Mandatory Continuing Legal Ethics Education for Lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Legal profession; Legal education; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03186251192095178,"score_gpt":0.4108620655133253,"score_spread":0.37899955359237353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287653972","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04907692,0.003095661,0.17864026,0.7169388,0.0064560934,0.002285793,0.000018756065,0.00016630234,0.043321423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716126,0.00083414826,0.0015123017,0.003106382,0.002081962,0.0000588154,0.000021653997,0.000013610382,0.020758552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814713,0.00014375792,0.00024801036,0.00013983781,0.00024219726,0.0010790433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984383,0.00041021238,0.00023874194,0.00008898252,0.0007400817,0.00008369713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056899046,0.000085262946,0.000102831276,0.00011130369,0.0012617724,0.0003590146,0.00022763418,0.0001396121,0.000033918153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002238785,0.000088172026,0.000091527676,0.00025232325,0.00006391676,0.0010212425,0.0000035630842,0.0018427594,0.000006078095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035370456,0.00008191736,0.000028941799,0.00000370726,0.000015550058,3.7053837e-8,0.004839802,0.0000030201275,0.00006484546,0.90088725,0.0037580833,0.0902815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028965666,0.00010999546,0.000063718544,0.000013359074,0.00002546283,0.000012135137,0.020276112,0.000008175918,0.00002984991,0.28604126,0.6930336,0.0000966788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003149447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029998042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92253566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084330793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022407768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98313427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289673374","doi":"","title":"La recherche en droit au Québec: Jalons pour une approche sociologique (Legal Research in Quebec: A Sociological Perspective)","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Concurrence; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.24712651577875402,"score_gpt":0.49793130288487497,"score_spread":0.250804787106121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289673374","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18002592,0.0030460325,0.005258234,0.6366929,0.00048493096,0.00026891005,0.0000020551865,0.00004209374,0.17417896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8857477,0.005214155,0.0009770222,0.00076629786,0.002763128,0.00004665594,0.0000035792723,0.00003051517,0.10445098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96081203,0.033635896,0.00062136346,0.0005299959,0.0006561636,0.003744567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804512,0.01780876,0.00034635945,0.0002598227,0.00087871414,0.0002551408],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08669155,0.00027436204,0.00038929004,0.0002918688,0.0014283948,0.0003596906,0.0008782516,0.0018816092,0.00033314654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027406486,0.00026147653,0.00022483672,0.0021269026,0.0018143127,0.0011165524,0.000091075686,0.040301193,0.000426153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052806132,0.00051735225,0.0015515616,0.00000804166,0.00009756062,0.000005769662,0.08734577,0.000014258789,0.000055994835,0.8600276,0.0016000984,0.04872318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034679976,0.00020611171,0.0013765276,0.000033193453,0.00002068786,0.000115374816,0.29373464,0.00005482069,0.0000031356149,0.55584824,0.14807163,0.00018880103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87092173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93863726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70572174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053005204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18087658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289772130","doi":"","title":"No Toilets in Park","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Curriculum; Sociology; Legal education; Pedagogy; Theme (computing); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016218718184735963,"score_gpt":0.35221655012777475,"score_spread":0.3359978319430388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289772130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1282049,0.0011723199,0.0003973255,0.22381727,0.00096631463,0.00013831144,5.6867066e-7,0.00004401008,0.64525896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96582246,0.0017998914,0.00016796078,0.0011157135,0.0013186398,0.0000036390322,7.9618934e-7,0.0000050946137,0.029765792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832773,0.00014737538,0.00017453879,0.00007403969,0.00020580317,0.0010705205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959004,0.000087751534,0.000087240325,0.000059685513,0.00012060243,0.000054677603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002753859,0.00004640718,0.000055758668,0.00010128802,0.00034517326,0.00011770772,0.0001663475,0.000047939266,0.0007190576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000682206,0.000045521643,0.000028291603,0.00038395548,0.000040103314,0.00075664924,0.000006108858,0.0018108439,0.00053164887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009165126,0.00008424218,0.0020346013,3.6971988e-7,0.000010311649,5.333838e-7,0.003477755,0.000010858741,0.000027980002,0.9389543,0.0035774244,0.051812448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016856275,0.000021612794,0.0006584764,0.0000035689761,0.000002802173,0.000015176972,0.0052116807,0.000008533748,0.0000043619575,0.051620916,0.9422199,0.00006440516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017414205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047799576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9386425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011418196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007979609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99764425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290199864","doi":"","title":"Ethical Lawyering Across Canada's Legal Traditions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal ethics; Legal realism; Legal pluralism; Law; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Legal history; Legal profession; Sociology; Empirical legal studies; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016023245609335605,"score_gpt":0.36018289232080103,"score_spread":0.34415964671146543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290199864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55685276,0.00004820518,0.0005727801,0.39726353,0.002710842,0.00008141294,0.00000826192,0.000044492564,0.042417686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99173456,0.00018844502,0.00010710751,0.0019219075,0.0013916576,0.000004862002,0.000003364325,0.000008770562,0.004639305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767643,0.00013278749,0.00019179964,0.000104418155,0.00039780416,0.0014967314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992476,0.0001871677,0.000105263294,0.0000983777,0.00020604559,0.0001555242],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003210963,0.00006920399,0.00007251633,0.000024294308,0.002049939,0.00034716434,0.0002658216,0.0001487946,0.00040050165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008863179,0.00006963001,0.000043008004,0.00034158048,0.00014041782,0.00050718884,0.0000072421894,0.010649183,0.000020907313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033262284,0.000025111462,0.00021229238,4.7399902e-7,0.000019267272,0.0000018825834,0.0024727168,0.0000023099385,0.00023701783,0.98877513,0.0027252098,0.005525231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001021695,0.000015299584,0.0006739501,0.000002046141,0.000007344769,0.00013975926,0.016276758,0.000005065288,0.000029308187,0.047044918,0.9356009,0.00010251666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70252657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94173026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008425319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035579335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290983796","doi":"","title":"CLC Stream B : Legal and judicial profession : feature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"De Rebus","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Kingdom; Political science; Session (web analytics); Legal profession; Feature (linguistics); Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.018447519455180313,"score_gpt":0.3643204762693952,"score_spread":0.34587295681421487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290983796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5875909,0.00008214244,0.000023648478,0.20510712,0.0005610414,0.00021477825,0.0000015545418,0.000059816957,0.20635904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838352,0.000038914422,0.00057295145,0.0013442041,0.00045580935,0.000018719717,0.000003870074,0.0000036277766,0.013726687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994962,0.000095528754,0.00005881874,0.000080700585,0.00013048964,0.00013824164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962974,0.00007707003,0.00004309286,0.00006219251,0.00011566207,0.00007225712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026080935,0.00003711717,0.00004255084,0.000033601238,0.0003989089,0.000182782,0.000058564914,0.00009351724,0.000560103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004182119,0.00003293247,0.000010581419,0.00021432816,0.00006532622,0.0005624659,0.000012179153,0.00025197383,0.00009753448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010291882,0.00011937402,0.015561854,0.000010794926,0.000013272443,0.0000028464215,0.04549987,4.770657e-7,0.0006789155,0.26365155,0.4984742,0.17597653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008071312,0.0000107888345,0.033607367,0.000008933962,0.0000054220154,0.0000019501224,0.0146154985,0.000013080108,0.000045782803,0.0023506153,0.94919837,0.00006145544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01624964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023163075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45072418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042089956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005815802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99030125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292446632","doi":"","title":"CORPORATE COUNSEL AS CORPORATE CONSCIENCE: ETHICS AND INTEGRITY IN THE POST-ENRON ERA","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Legal ethics; Confidentiality; Accountability; Interdependence; Corporate governance; Independence (probability theory); Professional conduct; Political science; Business; Public trust; Corporate law; Public relations; Professional responsibility; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.06382516744105722,"score_gpt":0.36770759977663375,"score_spread":0.30388243233557655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292446632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76315224,0.0006694095,0.00024949393,0.21430334,0.00038265454,0.00019084301,0.0000026095624,0.000019320023,0.021030085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99150395,0.0020880415,0.00006831466,0.0033334575,0.00027115858,0.0000057581897,0.000005241483,0.0000055862542,0.0027184982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969499,0.0010941236,0.00028123465,0.00015312055,0.0005411772,0.000980455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980799,0.000726904,0.0005144734,0.00010469213,0.0005199624,0.000054069405],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017732354,0.0000947274,0.00009825588,0.0001217402,0.0015927333,0.00057447975,0.00032670156,0.00014128858,0.00008217975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017523152,0.000070583395,0.000028955272,0.0009008359,0.00053021096,0.00081242755,0.000011143138,0.008825299,0.000035155128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016625852,0.000069807335,0.007316295,0.0000012129608,0.0000054166712,0.0000030103565,0.010072704,0.0000033328479,0.000089778856,0.98060596,0.000729752,0.0010861022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025998623,0.00010717732,0.009883661,0.00000918764,0.000012212647,0.00019492266,0.061660264,0.000016003507,0.000007959465,0.88622504,0.041501064,0.00012250642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029195365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11997673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2283517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048595326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023017729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293041762","doi":"","title":"The Globalization of Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Legal education; Curriculum; Political science; Legal research; Legal profession; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.00883824580175636,"score_gpt":0.33316624516737486,"score_spread":0.3243279993656185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293041762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16092741,0.003190743,0.0058849277,0.37876293,0.0034949698,0.00058958627,7.9852026e-7,0.000050342613,0.44709828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793492,0.00219063,0.00006055923,0.00028729124,0.00040735217,0.000009567907,0.0000015445987,0.0000037246948,0.017690113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998787,0.00017272212,0.00018790463,0.00004846248,0.00023262839,0.0005712677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990103,0.00009944666,0.00021193578,0.000077796125,0.0005615484,0.00003892707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017745389,0.00003733222,0.00003901703,0.000041948388,0.00088082155,0.00025866012,0.00019670764,0.000032571144,0.00016196902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074626616,0.000027535349,0.000030049136,0.00039898884,0.000093208226,0.0009041793,0.000006020205,0.00064001564,0.00006005343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017725927,0.000034449924,0.00054090226,3.977872e-7,0.000011521567,4.6810547e-9,0.00074600853,0.0000013575936,0.000029863782,0.9373566,0.00500987,0.05626725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049514194,0.00002144782,0.0010920806,0.0000031681907,0.0000072297153,0.0000094715315,0.031732105,0.0000061265005,0.000012941441,0.3942162,0.57281196,0.000037731872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009624703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007916641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8184218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047873688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017953228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293451274","doi":"","title":"Use of Electronic Appeal Transcripts in the Alberta Court of Appeal","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03880758510275726,"score_gpt":0.3646939187647742,"score_spread":0.3258863336620169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293451274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.772582,0.0018410569,0.00004433653,0.17582883,0.000093894094,0.0002997047,0.0000026526322,0.0000030943647,0.049304426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99326676,0.004810366,0.00004453996,0.0012235575,0.00008499688,0.0000013877224,4.6818937e-7,0.000005290564,0.00056264154],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806756,0.0007656849,0.00047959381,0.00006130848,0.00043738133,0.00018848195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652165,0.00228433,0.00067939266,0.00011303609,0.00036388444,0.000037715257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044009453,0.00007894201,0.00019022955,0.00007136502,0.00019031343,0.00007839679,0.00032346224,0.000057406458,0.00028437737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000738603,0.000045233064,0.000054406617,0.0006379928,0.00021133952,0.0016579347,0.000004506863,0.0006189082,0.0000042435418],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004628918,0.0018312712,0.0016685595,0.00024588945,0.0011949642,0.0000093186645,0.8822886,0.0019060584,0.0007673348,0.050899442,0.005921011,0.04863863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005041053,0.00031823534,0.0007223277,0.000060636296,0.0010260693,0.00018475964,0.05942561,0.00006453542,0.0003150069,0.0042135096,0.9330376,0.00012759688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006229106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002150114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9271166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016730663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077019504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9416586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293459718","doi":"10.14288/1.0076763","title":"The lawyer as advisor : advocate, judge or… friend?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.01504776243645802,"score_gpt":0.2530450633208249,"score_spread":0.23799730088436685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293459718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66678196,0.000041428695,0.00017325276,0.021978768,0.0006034902,0.00021126533,0.000016165119,0.000086768494,0.31010687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95674956,0.00014987717,0.00016104979,0.0003764753,0.00009199079,7.1868635e-7,0.000004868747,0.0000056087847,0.042459838],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905473,0.00020019252,0.00009152126,0.00017423325,0.00026922493,0.00021012632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988706,0.00036190407,0.00012836594,0.00020565657,0.00033138238,0.00010205117],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007308014,0.000023772001,0.00009245023,0.00002125873,0.001805625,0.00033251828,0.0003987364,0.00007552013,0.0010567106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008108755,0.00006235093,0.000051775525,0.00053332467,0.0005231456,0.0006724511,0.00004978225,0.000176585,0.0002249285],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015430604,0.00012924455,0.0022000538,0.000010448545,0.000027179372,0.000008450844,0.0075018527,9.5021994e-7,0.00002175119,0.0044898856,0.13214046,0.8534543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019538423,0.000026024632,0.30164284,0.000012473486,0.000012214534,0.0000035381508,0.020947,0.000009827591,1.831341e-7,0.0015008717,0.67557454,0.00007510842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4705483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8280371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8533792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005585214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061151595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295142193","doi":"10.29173/alr780","title":"Implications of Case Management and Active Adjudication for Judicial Disqualification","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Apprehension; Intervention (counseling); Settlement (finance); Political science; Judicial review; Judicial discretion; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.09939715226642387,"score_gpt":0.4640134142753247,"score_spread":0.36461626200890085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295142193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017338869,0.0036990321,0.0011647587,0.33262873,0.0002827702,0.0029576183,0.000044745822,0.000020280046,0.6574682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823206,0.012908367,0.0008651088,0.0018648455,0.00009513592,0.0004840605,0.000044278124,0.0000067545243,0.0014108567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993774,0.00007448992,0.00023109792,0.00014361947,0.000082460145,0.00009089097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985495,0.0003439595,0.00045140288,0.00038235035,0.0002239722,0.000048799066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052296655,0.000051689352,0.00011737876,0.00002083584,0.001251732,0.00007617432,0.00016180414,0.000031352956,0.00009530319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009724659,0.000051344014,0.000035012614,0.00010352875,0.00018304322,0.0005564478,0.000022516964,0.000049006772,0.00001222073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023386096,0.000036994355,0.00008677474,0.00019928193,0.00001909663,1.249412e-7,0.0008162599,2.3251642e-8,0.000003402294,0.9430418,0.003074322,0.052719552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010184906,0.00000864227,0.0032004968,0.00019586954,0.00016506857,0.0000051504503,0.00032324716,0.000001806715,0.0000142571425,0.009972812,0.98594093,0.00006987075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022808082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018800223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9828666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030565585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000820632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295867102","doi":"","title":"'I Am Not a Caped Crusader': Clinical Legal Education and Professional Identity Formation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Legal education; Political science; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07657239234425363,"score_gpt":0.4719044302973549,"score_spread":0.3953320379531013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295867102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80990756,0.0008564719,0.004741905,0.15041813,0.005336776,0.00036814125,0.0000018967307,0.00006332751,0.028305758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847055,0.00087110326,0.00032765424,0.0015199267,0.0015220587,0.000011663638,0.000008369808,0.0000071818363,0.011026505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976716,0.0005613069,0.00040801486,0.00012762971,0.00049778656,0.00073364377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867016,0.00012989341,0.00032664373,0.00008491145,0.0005770744,0.00021131673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007760824,0.00007731925,0.00010418505,0.00012047735,0.00077168614,0.00038975212,0.00017825775,0.00011240281,0.00006343458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002109847,0.000071926755,0.000045642275,0.0003473875,0.00012026649,0.004514982,0.000023764187,0.0020317421,0.00007037262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003911925,0.00025014338,0.0031734111,0.000002310735,0.000021207346,2.4368512e-7,0.005270168,6.797167e-7,0.000018738225,0.9517604,0.008164005,0.031299558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007927975,0.00013438036,0.009090256,0.00002237114,0.00004683359,0.00019327093,0.09607352,0.000046955905,0.000010737714,0.3002862,0.5930982,0.00020441454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020247658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01215244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6514742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008125369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031686045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9738034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296416967","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1358","title":"Measuring the Effects of Feminist Legal Research: Looking Critically at \"Failure\" and \"Success\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Scholarship; Relation (database); Knowledge production; Point (geometry); Epistemology; Feminism; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07389473532086727,"score_gpt":0.39302807172815774,"score_spread":0.31913333640729047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296416967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04851476,0.0004836932,0.00017514077,0.11982673,0.00067045196,0.00019583674,0.0000015248703,0.000020724146,0.83011115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973622,0.00009804597,0.00075391063,0.00083415565,0.00046497563,0.0000062496897,3.555029e-7,0.000009160649,0.00047096566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796045,0.00051524566,0.0002584442,0.00012406208,0.00080201525,0.00033979517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976165,0.0012902478,0.00012489673,0.00013483093,0.00065980863,0.00017368842],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034746663,0.000072678544,0.00010633301,0.000072932795,0.0036365197,0.0006960308,0.0003077822,0.0000711496,0.000116958254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004194731,0.000055379023,0.000044703545,0.00035738392,0.0008592454,0.00068256113,0.000071966075,0.0009899352,0.000017097726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011605772,0.00006552991,0.00060864125,0.000024281799,0.00001900781,0.000020081547,0.006288791,0.0000029252844,0.0010323151,0.99085057,0.0004978816,0.00057837233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013192083,0.00022009325,0.0028116473,0.00057039683,0.00008059942,0.0005070887,0.018093117,0.0000033216393,0.007587884,0.29320335,0.6752841,0.00031920007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040195163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14380667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9488474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019656184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006667426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99766064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296563645","doi":"","title":"To Make a Difference","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Scholarship; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.024858577219946144,"score_gpt":0.3764989386513703,"score_spread":0.35164036143142413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296563645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47038248,0.0003781848,0.071748,0.18742959,0.0015492605,0.00023801888,8.8228916e-7,0.00008571499,0.26818788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96904427,0.00024670543,0.00027725875,0.0017178793,0.00067113724,0.0000017441032,4.4715486e-7,0.0000052631417,0.028035292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799615,0.00007093407,0.00015853024,0.000082315666,0.00027817723,0.0014138782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994111,0.0001273891,0.000075731,0.000072653456,0.00017193684,0.000141162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046353624,0.000049584505,0.00005244198,0.00012419617,0.00063509506,0.00014610174,0.00021051991,0.00004200165,0.00017035595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008074353,0.00004648385,0.000029827284,0.00058258255,0.000037166916,0.00017714253,0.000010181159,0.001469139,0.00016161392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011076801,0.00003273023,0.0015888707,2.3803594e-7,0.0000104035935,6.5913673e-7,0.0046496224,4.544794e-7,0.00011748854,0.9098491,0.00038071355,0.08335866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012819613,0.000075695825,0.008544541,0.0000049062114,0.000008086477,0.000038474744,0.032725308,6.1376556e-7,0.00003167873,0.2408652,0.7174616,0.00011572274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001626246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05473536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7170809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007976693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062510795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298823781","doi":"","title":"Book Note: Preventive Justice, by Andrew Ashworth & Lucia Zedner","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03816903943832534,"score_gpt":0.3751420251431837,"score_spread":0.33697298570485834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298823781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001671329,0.0026162986,0.0014904995,0.038613804,0.0017228442,0.00013578757,0.000011559917,0.00004367414,0.9551984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85048157,0.0008810435,0.0028412675,0.017638538,0.0026759591,0.00001536503,0.000024438983,0.000032410277,0.1254094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981788,0.00039499777,0.00031019686,0.00015853437,0.00061671686,0.00034076127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983555,0.00015397914,0.0003069637,0.00013526276,0.00060420076,0.00044410085],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015831719,0.00011217345,0.00013586576,0.00005644494,0.0013068013,0.0006078454,0.0002834901,0.00011834671,0.0026449512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079266645,0.00010427155,0.00006682594,0.00032834653,0.00018141714,0.0019263726,0.000027281347,0.0008204849,0.0003930654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001915622,0.00014694434,0.00006768327,0.0000029947007,0.000025082907,0.000008962341,0.0071710814,0.000007796459,0.0000349432,0.27672693,0.71389806,0.0018903727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038351494,0.000037455775,0.000038436,0.000017887287,0.00007651786,0.000032975637,0.0037626585,0.000009923209,0.000067058965,0.015002042,0.98042727,0.00014426268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015219474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026974643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85031444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020980462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013214255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299081848","doi":"","title":"Rehabilitate and punish: discursive braiding within debates for lowering the minimum age of criminal responsibility in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal responsibility; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Criminal law","score_opus":0.025201454232345925,"score_gpt":0.28897387945677955,"score_spread":0.2637724252244336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299081848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97863275,0.000019039346,0.000032158685,0.01966311,0.0002627442,0.00027016317,0.000015865624,0.000005484545,0.0010986954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987729,0.0000068009435,0.00072430976,0.0000675467,0.00001667736,6.402525e-7,0.000002073406,0.000003368735,0.00040565716],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991399,0.00024282109,0.0001356332,0.00013913895,0.00019611369,0.00014641725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762595,0.0017188665,0.00017735323,0.00022839,0.00020159555,0.000047836675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002544848,0.000058735426,0.0001132325,0.00006280369,0.0007590033,0.00004841557,0.00037516849,0.000041386556,0.000043520442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002830127,0.000048179652,0.000033993136,0.00036697864,0.00063944916,0.0007176435,0.000066373104,0.00042669626,4.1172797e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091073907,0.00023098671,0.2181313,0.00016470278,0.00009900303,0.000014390503,0.63716674,0.00010319407,0.04589411,0.09141144,0.0015185458,0.004354864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043330825,0.000051585146,0.47801957,0.00004872511,0.000055800083,0.0000017541065,0.5084322,0.00008886821,0.0007717724,0.005895824,0.0060560256,0.00014455806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7143833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97253644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25988826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103311795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014736941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5837716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299800824","doi":"","title":"The Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Encyclopedia; Philosophy of law; Subject (documents); Law; Globe; Cover (algebra); Political philosophy; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Comparative law; Engineering; Library science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.028906042041283116,"score_gpt":0.35994556595702787,"score_spread":0.33103952391574476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299800824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054942727,0.00095966144,0.00029808265,0.104022786,0.00064825517,0.00008977814,5.576185e-7,0.000020910698,0.8390172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807923,0.010666382,0.00003247975,0.00039195808,0.0009483635,0.000002345302,8.060287e-7,0.0000050734548,0.0071603158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985379,0.00021451402,0.00018011853,0.000059703303,0.00025549284,0.00075228076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931717,0.00015132026,0.00016151695,0.0001048316,0.00020700251,0.000058153844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002937872,0.000043436292,0.00005013999,0.00003446261,0.0012326232,0.000108386965,0.00028283263,0.000036678495,0.0001101086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030872214,0.00003158775,0.000036044043,0.00028073252,0.00017497684,0.0006873311,0.000006592414,0.0011501507,0.000023015778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010409749,0.00004294025,0.0004265704,2.0601756e-7,0.000014661006,2.0889625e-7,0.0025743132,9.332272e-7,0.000009472852,0.9836648,0.00017761723,0.013077838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053609558,0.000039105857,0.000104642255,0.0000011659014,0.000005099501,0.000014779676,0.0056715575,9.403611e-7,0.0000019503557,0.5028519,0.49122748,0.000027784034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026419505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024565898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92584956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023197512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049090423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299835984","doi":"","title":"Defining Access to Justice: The Charter and the Courts (and the Law Commission of Ontario)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Commission; Law; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.06012035141865464,"score_gpt":0.33140635452712414,"score_spread":0.2712860031084695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299835984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023061274,0.0030709568,0.0026735633,0.43194908,0.0018475085,0.00096258,0.000041414118,0.000015569598,0.536378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98214746,0.00023898778,0.0006065481,0.0064943386,0.00023424852,0.00008373412,0.000006130996,0.0000046197356,0.010183922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869,0.00038599526,0.00033353738,0.00015816171,0.00026563441,0.00016664239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967231,0.0022441961,0.0002685622,0.00018638404,0.00049837504,0.00007933939],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028301869,0.00009759245,0.00015508533,0.0000487279,0.0018518494,0.0002411616,0.00033758002,0.00009516053,0.0006265714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018949172,0.000062313964,0.000050875642,0.00034732968,0.0038336082,0.0006717225,0.00008516223,0.00041084064,0.000028688864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074608986,0.000048743277,0.0005829337,0.000026786207,0.000037153735,4.996008e-7,0.08492319,0.000035813664,0.0000010403011,0.91136134,0.0019913996,0.00091650157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018410722,0.00001581006,0.012453416,0.00021269375,0.00043777694,0.000089915375,0.008351503,0.0007291695,0.00001669358,0.2509798,0.7247043,0.00016778849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06687157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03426669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023894952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016761185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300395326","doi":"","title":"Taillefer: Disclosure, Guilty Please and Ethics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Pleading; Law; Plea; Legal ethics; Supreme court; Political science; Presumption of innocence","score_opus":0.043356684335679394,"score_gpt":0.3814595483077474,"score_spread":0.338102863972068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300395326","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13413554,0.0013750729,0.0049152775,0.8012412,0.0008216289,0.00014413922,0.000005267596,0.000061782426,0.057300076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97104555,0.0090602795,0.00007664015,0.0008694157,0.000553981,0.000002956388,6.319128e-7,0.0000075935563,0.01838297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814075,0.0003208143,0.00016446454,0.000108169486,0.00030317873,0.00096260646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901134,0.00042441278,0.0001253459,0.00009614565,0.00022293905,0.00011984089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004539059,0.0000647415,0.00006786326,0.00006814775,0.001012625,0.00015326677,0.00016951746,0.0000987457,0.00032497995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003431293,0.000043432316,0.000032152006,0.000224279,0.00018305374,0.0007204967,0.000017673357,0.0020437103,0.00006231678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009444447,0.000026182466,0.0026387188,7.631595e-7,0.000022722612,4.1745778e-7,0.0031323435,6.137411e-8,0.00006473681,0.9670766,0.0020637098,0.02496432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023672041,0.00003964536,0.00094048795,0.000009178065,0.000012748081,0.000031564025,0.009384414,3.336088e-7,0.000008753368,0.38857317,0.6006786,0.000084360145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000971399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013781641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004784023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010554581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99505466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300502709","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1331622","title":"Banned from Lawyering: Gordon Martin, Communist","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Communism; Political science; Economic history; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02030866571212508,"score_gpt":0.34582049669557674,"score_spread":0.32551183098345166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300502709","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31572807,0.0014655241,0.0017196725,0.41400793,0.0010344391,0.00016880038,0.000003195089,0.00013684254,0.26573554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897965,0.0012053498,0.00019261394,0.0018792261,0.0007061163,0.0000014528205,0.000007638524,0.0000064655446,0.006204617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980529,0.00026234827,0.00021528885,0.000093270835,0.00026351237,0.001112655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933857,0.000110373796,0.00016484533,0.0001481368,0.00014619502,0.00009187269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002056672,0.00007586643,0.0000897652,0.000065063,0.0012388712,0.00031971073,0.00034269431,0.00006633995,0.0005138201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041772702,0.000075566495,0.00005331802,0.00035285848,0.00006595269,0.0006567479,0.000010341432,0.0022795943,0.00012962433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021820746,0.00010988048,0.00087911886,2.2374847e-7,0.000028999528,8.7998524e-7,0.005052059,0.0000025123759,0.0002241134,0.9591612,0.0032042768,0.031314887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017178114,0.00008350726,0.0014838048,0.000005917924,0.000013901016,0.000011257758,0.016381783,0.000009394016,0.000026006683,0.39817083,0.5835329,0.00010886415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057748603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020092353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67406845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006657262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004475178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301169550","doi":"10.5040/9781472560247.ch-014","title":"Shifting Paradigms of Parochialism : Lessons for Legal Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parochialism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0771406515421187,"score_gpt":0.37059185981372506,"score_spread":0.29345120827160637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301169550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002354224,0.000058885467,0.0008604615,0.054011513,0.0029563822,0.00053258095,0.00005628394,0.00010101372,0.94139934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06411661,0.000009755219,0.0022599783,0.0021449889,0.0035772726,0.00011203861,0.00025847938,0.000057586505,0.9274633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816096,0.000091192174,0.0005700236,0.00035745543,0.00051637075,0.00030402862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968845,0.00071369536,0.00094391796,0.0003760429,0.00092543825,0.0001563574],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002105963,0.00021183754,0.00031887,0.000314575,0.00076691736,0.0022544668,0.00054068386,0.00047380885,0.00032736693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002890475,0.00023633479,0.0001783091,0.000058674712,0.00024628043,0.0014626152,0.000047121233,0.0007432984,0.000025538788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055016517,0.000014801184,0.0000022815932,0.00004249397,0.000025958749,8.176551e-8,0.005455539,2.7498825e-7,0.000009972259,0.8221182,0.14062232,0.03170256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010175994,0.000015365315,0.000009567817,0.0001577245,0.00006168763,0.0000010673792,0.00072257774,0.0000028226248,0.000022815528,0.08473512,0.9139407,0.00022878761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030167275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018963063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7733184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015549683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053424896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301452080","doi":"","title":"Making the Common Good Common","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections Canadian Journal of Music","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.16638333527002278,"score_gpt":0.3935733161518743,"score_spread":0.22718998088185152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301452080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3722477,0.00022876708,0.0002763215,0.17296998,0.01038388,0.00014473233,0.000008098307,0.000017451475,0.44372308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952025,0.0000022446081,0.00008263786,0.0028178806,0.00073574594,0.000002172025,7.038906e-7,0.000005728925,0.0011504238],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990765,0.00026732244,0.00024866013,0.00004608568,0.00018826113,0.0001731962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875575,0.0001660071,0.00022511613,0.00011646826,0.00043476684,0.00030190108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011977344,0.000049579197,0.00007891599,0.00027457767,0.0008080529,0.00028093279,0.00030197756,0.000045141467,0.000667021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069585757,0.000040078838,0.00005843748,0.0006330423,0.00019647321,0.0005422165,0.000006371394,0.0005210458,0.000054295895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001326242,0.000047536865,0.020851854,0.000001937303,0.000077424425,0.00003586671,0.2861087,0.00014455926,0.0000065293207,0.12306267,0.5592017,0.0104479585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008717205,0.000035895144,0.002238863,0.000020044738,0.000019205654,0.00009991239,0.093062736,0.000008165839,0.000002330148,0.0025306924,0.9018465,0.000048458383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24474967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9018935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65714383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004440322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041493988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7602796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301507077","doi":"","title":"The Accreditation of Trinity Western University's Law Program","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Law; Accreditation; Legal profession; Sociology; Political science; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.05410614306659953,"score_gpt":0.38297635560883336,"score_spread":0.3288702125422338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301507077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39972,0.00090086233,0.0021651324,0.22373345,0.0025282209,0.0007064908,0.000003709616,0.00013837221,0.37010375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928632,0.00050103123,0.00007031685,0.000063941254,0.0002603054,8.728603e-7,0.0000013762774,0.0000027287685,0.0062362277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988226,0.00027736323,0.00011243387,0.000044943783,0.00025332876,0.00048928085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910945,0.00016188662,0.00017661584,0.00006268915,0.00042684944,0.00006249293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033899718,0.000032875465,0.000043377204,0.00003463248,0.000671073,0.00010932692,0.00021282645,0.000034007415,0.00000728814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004431025,0.000026157888,0.00002893401,0.00034449747,0.00016106246,0.00059808325,0.000009654451,0.00081663096,0.000013431187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025383131,0.0000524781,0.00071845675,3.331382e-7,0.000020482965,1.6996744e-7,0.0037279285,0.000001811983,0.0000022171107,0.9759438,0.00047652813,0.0190304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022876365,0.00011569176,0.00035715097,0.000001972107,0.000013279513,0.0000067996007,0.07339954,0.000001969708,0.000005611272,0.10821587,0.8176173,0.000036049252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027178056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043107864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86772794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005073913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010080386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99553156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301725652","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1222","title":"The Cost of Uncertainty: Navigating the Boundary Between Legal Information and Legal Services in the Access to Justice Sector","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Disadvantaged; CLARITY; Business; Variety (cybernetics); Public relations; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.048241454563298536,"score_gpt":0.4264439621798989,"score_spread":0.37820250761660035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301725652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5041536,0.00003195003,0.000024692288,0.48330766,0.0001708092,0.00014600542,0.0000137959305,0.0000024511442,0.012149017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98947984,0.000070003145,0.000010636917,0.008789536,0.0016025252,0.0000034532347,6.383505e-7,0.0000020539308,0.00004131027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989033,0.0002967771,0.00033221694,0.000032862044,0.0003002194,0.00013462674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982758,0.00096645794,0.0004026026,0.000047527174,0.00026822404,0.000039381677],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021504688,0.0000491188,0.00009185309,0.000038008762,0.0015189967,0.0010057645,0.00030611813,0.000043731172,0.0000051677757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047062684,0.000021935779,0.000026587288,0.00032256418,0.00032409522,0.0024036346,0.000036290454,0.0002882685,9.127013e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003541966,0.000013597027,0.001049599,0.000020635802,0.000022819688,3.7791898e-7,0.14255579,0.0000016995335,0.000022075224,0.7982371,0.0012462627,0.056794655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022906935,0.00003086962,0.023314936,0.00004293259,0.00003123661,0.0000046443665,0.053769153,0.0000017698858,0.000007605786,0.0050068405,0.9175141,0.000046878547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041851416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012702838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9162678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006135544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078286685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302325230","doi":"","title":"Institutionalizing Access to Justice: Judicial, Legislative and Grassroots Dimensions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Grassroots; Economic Justice; Political science; Supreme court; Doctrine; Law; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05312378472713806,"score_gpt":0.42985094120303646,"score_spread":0.3767271564758984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302325230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.320285,0.0022335965,0.09352223,0.16167307,0.0036576544,0.0006677732,0.0000048167853,0.000128298,0.41782755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940442,0.0011466006,0.0003350018,0.002042216,0.0008845157,0.0000034383243,0.0000017328766,0.0000071143395,0.0015351833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796337,0.00010809216,0.0002335232,0.00014014343,0.00035062066,0.0012042483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989761,0.00028527257,0.00014069641,0.00006826698,0.00033546996,0.00019418722],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042847674,0.00008083326,0.00008761946,0.00023820547,0.0021124522,0.000340486,0.00020213799,0.00006328763,0.00006535543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016700304,0.00007922682,0.000028340663,0.0008474763,0.0001380459,0.0014050623,0.000038587154,0.0014627697,0.00003215178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016684355,0.0000385602,0.001452367,9.816864e-7,0.00002774012,0.0000015528811,0.004988671,0.000010220225,0.00008081163,0.9858543,0.0013950586,0.006133013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029176206,0.00008150699,0.009774545,0.000025038129,0.000081319,0.000074383825,0.038543243,0.0000037787163,0.00002780916,0.2935957,0.6572835,0.00021744502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026516714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033625092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69225866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008096502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007939277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302541037","doi":"","title":"An Introduction to David Wexler, the Person Behind Therapeutic Jurisprudence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Sociology; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Jurisprudence; Law; Field (mathematics); Miami; General partnership; Mental health; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.0255163579905696,"score_gpt":0.3646001503885506,"score_spread":0.339083792397981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302541037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11768566,0.00027430823,0.0090182265,0.86900157,0.0012178468,0.00016970224,8.8736635e-7,0.000038620816,0.0025931797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815554,0.00069060485,0.000050015886,0.0014307016,0.003960286,0.000009751576,5.40784e-7,0.000009503911,0.0122932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792594,0.0003940643,0.00014425993,0.0001637691,0.00036461567,0.001007382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921227,0.0001325854,0.0001237363,0.0002022692,0.00022805382,0.000101095735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00416595,0.000075648335,0.00006119592,0.00008636643,0.001273977,0.00027212477,0.00042489803,0.00005040397,0.00048123943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045045206,0.000043386703,0.000038792536,0.00034604155,0.00010669286,0.0011844706,0.00000711726,0.0010753255,0.00015590177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027156828,0.000072431125,0.00084370194,3.3000433e-7,0.000034824585,1.7264841e-7,0.016077006,0.0000029356693,0.0037420203,0.8235946,0.0031825572,0.15242222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015842187,0.000209729,0.002185495,0.0000047520502,0.000024818655,0.00004781164,0.03374833,0.0000019859758,0.00020640121,0.06948173,0.8938015,0.0001290384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008099825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008367229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8906189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088602287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047160466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.979853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2304994647","doi":"","title":"Is this Toronto’s rudest lawyer?; Joseph Groia lost his appeal on Monday to overturn a finding of ‘incivility’ against him for his defence of a Bre-X geologist. Are lawyers increasingly crossing the line between zealous advocacy and downright rudeness?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geologist; Appeal; Law; Sociology; Management; Criminology; Engineering; Political science; History; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.09496085033656788,"score_gpt":0.3910978892245299,"score_spread":0.29613703888796206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2304994647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.917084,0.0001875759,0.00080914673,0.033286463,0.0003887084,0.00084086135,0.00015531151,0.00005861432,0.04718934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927178,0.000025330084,0.0017430068,0.002372386,0.0002618579,0.000027313514,0.000022714774,0.000017202237,0.0028123753],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976928,0.00029717354,0.0006038112,0.0003906293,0.0006084346,0.00040713986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634886,0.0015686303,0.0005918723,0.00038982302,0.0008501218,0.00025070488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002457354,0.00021476566,0.0003889129,0.00010625028,0.000981058,0.00031932868,0.00046374602,0.00018747809,0.00021482808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032225484,0.00015085744,0.00009732775,0.00048620437,0.0007470085,0.0008411283,0.00011248646,0.00025059434,0.000013848025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010736006,0.0012600729,0.3036155,0.00037070486,0.0003410739,0.000005657996,0.519539,0.00012234217,0.001599502,0.08277376,0.054971855,0.034326922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020450295,0.00076780154,0.08946138,0.0004825665,0.00022494113,0.0000060686657,0.058437508,0.00025499015,0.0027453809,0.0026580226,0.8420173,0.0008990061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12065029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050596338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7870454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048755176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014193673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9667278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305226740","doi":"","title":"The State We’re In: Legal Education in Canada’s New Political Economy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Politics; Political science; Political economy; Economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03209552266601141,"score_gpt":0.369878876667491,"score_spread":0.3377833540014796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305226740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015972199,0.00002458739,0.000007034628,0.42889792,0.000312343,0.000070887785,2.4986667e-7,0.000004736213,0.55471003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91279024,0.000042580963,0.000058079822,0.007813588,0.0001834632,0.00000896515,0.0000018416526,0.000002515839,0.079098724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999284,0.00009494389,0.00017469276,0.00008375821,0.00010071019,0.0002618691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994241,0.00028180567,0.000034108427,0.00008586436,0.00005796486,0.00011613473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032679265,0.000038980328,0.00004226103,0.00005172069,0.00018943827,0.00018325444,0.00012934736,0.000019784884,0.00084505416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024391137,0.000032109507,0.000008090939,0.00036630558,0.000039328486,0.0005660374,0.000007777528,0.00018142397,0.00003649136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026269458,0.00002499155,0.014340042,4.3712168e-7,9.627945e-7,6.0836936e-7,0.0019122619,0.0000028263285,1.552563e-7,0.89769536,0.06799592,0.01802379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000534071,0.0000017239714,0.01231106,0.0000024399621,5.742992e-7,6.027768e-7,0.03658407,0.00001282176,0.0000019450285,0.023838367,0.92714906,0.000043904485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89681804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010210341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0663121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93898106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305818085","doi":"","title":"bio.legal LLP: An Alternative to Outside Legal Counsel and Full Time In-House Counsel","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Right to counsel; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.025622851021442298,"score_gpt":0.28186889981318897,"score_spread":0.2562460487917467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305818085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93249744,0.000018994291,0.00012926268,0.01202628,0.00032169733,0.00027523108,0.000031531206,0.00014916036,0.0545504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743007,0.00016898867,0.0003358003,0.0015328024,0.00017160927,0.0000014190749,0.000013509196,0.000018428147,0.023456737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855286,0.0002458856,0.00016502044,0.00035134525,0.0003549666,0.00032990097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989429,0.00017084987,0.00010067957,0.00020575483,0.00028693315,0.00029288768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003649818,0.00014422816,0.00016433801,0.0005101198,0.0006969858,0.00015431595,0.0003433681,0.00011348641,0.00035087025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017061626,0.00017445652,0.000035374345,0.0014572481,0.00030062918,0.0023784335,0.000040181214,0.00032922506,0.00033359698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009868781,0.0016464319,0.45495856,0.000020614782,0.00016177063,0.0014930109,0.040449522,0.00032015058,0.00019602486,0.20909612,0.28748524,0.003185676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050108146,0.000092881455,0.0024410526,0.000009617586,0.000015753765,7.607944e-8,0.039112464,0.0000592588,0.00006430135,0.00013255911,0.95733434,0.00023659374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023858937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36559755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6698491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027203688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000795673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305914159","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511610394.001","title":"Preface","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05117445743945812,"score_gpt":0.2871295792726475,"score_spread":0.23595512183318937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305914159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012646531,0.00006415658,0.000059159847,0.0018765269,0.00046624703,0.0002865618,0.00007093768,0.00015793364,0.9970058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00070849084,0.00018235833,0.00015837561,0.00036354762,0.0006082076,5.0005895e-7,0.00002678029,0.000020693613,0.99793106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990148,0.00006396213,0.00012880011,0.00027080742,0.00030974374,0.00021187929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891454,0.000121872865,0.00021264526,0.00029941194,0.00029331894,0.00015818802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020723292,0.00016388408,0.00015943761,0.00013687099,0.00063148973,0.00012390429,0.00040990417,0.0003271068,0.00015643248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006266284,0.0002144242,0.000100376026,0.000015085274,0.00032405712,0.00032262527,0.00008730935,0.00063556683,0.00015643825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009062189,0.0000066899206,5.382402e-7,0.0000056615186,0.00002994686,0.000008921473,0.0006599698,4.0484554e-7,0.0000016635623,0.79342073,0.20373075,0.0021256825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012269325,0.0000074229606,0.0000052003957,0.000028188837,0.00007534472,0.0000011717254,0.00036272238,0.0000014780263,0.000010357228,0.000019270808,0.99913114,0.00023501343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020857088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011939684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7954004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036434623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010104798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87439656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310463007","doi":"10.59962/9780774831000-011","title":"A New Wave of Access to Justice Reform in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.05371875538461471,"score_gpt":0.2645532948549393,"score_spread":0.21083453947032457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310463007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047978255,0.000025980024,0.000031777887,0.0008317127,0.00033825682,0.00033853366,0.0003119683,0.000010874124,0.99763113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020394372,0.00009467728,0.00027205315,0.00018922194,0.00007800638,3.2149757e-7,0.0000049488945,0.0000100528305,0.97895634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899685,0.000034463752,0.00021076809,0.00020292192,0.00038625766,0.00016875756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988142,0.000119434706,0.00031238436,0.00018585242,0.00040784018,0.00016023905],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016349486,0.000063307416,0.00023535125,0.000067204885,0.00014921346,0.00009979861,0.00048645912,0.00014271485,0.0014785837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008358793,0.00013403627,0.00004444465,0.000031624986,0.00012621963,0.0002796412,0.00014585332,0.00022738535,0.0000024723258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056251673,0.000026918999,0.00014429905,0.00018211924,0.00010557043,0.00015470343,0.007182643,0.0000014730448,0.000004054228,0.14995098,0.5952257,0.24696527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023866142,0.000012144915,0.00091482553,0.0004353172,0.00006144538,0.0000019409902,0.0015763872,3.6401318e-7,0.0000013871338,0.0014457573,0.9951508,0.00016099306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99985325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39992505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011750051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009262483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315304205","doi":"10.1061/40754(183)116","title":"Canadian Construction Claim Tracker: An Integrated Repository System for Canadian Case-Law Construction Claims","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Arbitration; Negotiation; Categorization; Computer science; Construction contract; Law; Dispute resolution; Compromise; Artificial intelligence; Business; Political science; Contract management","score_opus":0.025346501351866384,"score_gpt":0.3179735148097086,"score_spread":0.2926270134578422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315304205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09362339,0.000028991954,0.0006465291,0.05628689,0.0062351613,0.0012688044,0.00019220958,0.00038856355,0.84132946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824647,0.000002411521,0.011055953,0.0013279618,0.0009293248,0.000065540924,0.00010834863,0.0000149669495,0.004030793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985825,0.00017267873,0.0003660752,0.00027215533,0.00015988674,0.00044670852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979832,0.00010402422,0.0001363662,0.00020613467,0.00074166845,0.0008286013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006682874,0.00012486315,0.00012760072,0.00031851412,0.0032489828,0.00053933443,0.00013396774,0.0002587814,0.0007799739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001113352,0.00013325745,0.000044215067,0.0005718214,0.00031020233,0.0016099033,0.0000022373458,0.00028608297,0.000053255666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068427034,0.00001502851,0.00049401866,0.000007274161,0.000020246076,0.000021438067,0.004360915,0.000012863424,0.00002556571,0.96346354,0.00980961,0.021762643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016918372,0.000023090934,0.00003931647,0.0000100989355,0.000029677363,0.0010901246,0.113825455,0.00027674306,0.00019583643,0.00022296293,0.8839301,0.0001874506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99973184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96324056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033285485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010503937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99804866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315807730","doi":"10.1097/01.eem.0000326307.73112.d6","title":"Articles from the 2006 LLSA Reading List","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emergency Medicine News","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14004046675451232,"score_gpt":0.41491459959289323,"score_spread":0.2748741328383809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315807730","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14227,0.0007462622,0.00024633534,0.45436853,0.004814359,0.00016478945,0.00000518787,0.000079907564,0.39730462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439771,0.0023620385,0.00019243425,0.0043177838,0.0063707605,0.000021065129,0.00002177028,0.000011173802,0.042725846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882126,0.00016778808,0.000306794,0.00014124738,0.00037342223,0.0001894927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990331,0.00036473418,0.00012430284,0.00022430359,0.00015944369,0.00009412865],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006031555,0.00007011448,0.00008959118,0.000037086058,0.0010879994,0.00001049635,0.00023440117,0.000042794454,0.029903026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003519851,0.000046735455,0.00003007958,0.000823852,0.000266155,0.0003200395,0.000014012393,0.0002395003,0.0003103228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002680893,0.000025902018,0.029578144,5.2259304e-7,0.000007757352,8.7332626e-7,0.051898114,4.0182638e-7,0.00025758252,0.015779825,0.9009844,0.0014637696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988227,0.000011584452,0.016907254,0.000008388852,0.00001418041,6.6945614e-7,0.017082747,0.000006601636,0.00002711128,0.0030120292,0.96277785,0.000061694285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21229535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026353817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80170715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033827695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025550026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316443630","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007420","title":"Still “Law” and Still “Learning”? Quel «droit» et quel «savoir?»","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Legal research; Law; Agency (philosophy); Mandate; Political science; Legal education; Commission; Legal profession; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.02769544051571706,"score_gpt":0.3099887976768725,"score_spread":0.28229335716115544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316443630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5834328,0.0021597843,0.00019363638,0.05115874,0.0021819947,0.0003913792,0.000099292825,0.00003609031,0.3603463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727827,0.0006783157,0.00072244206,0.019293385,0.0002881386,0.000006004493,0.000010145394,0.00003147836,0.0061874166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997846,0.0004770969,0.000503367,0.00027347106,0.00017907273,0.0007210053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624705,0.00062457134,0.00045271814,0.00016700778,0.0006928902,0.001815736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031148572,0.00020851534,0.0003732157,0.00009414789,0.0011281541,0.00049862685,0.00023403789,0.00028104577,0.00039696143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018589825,0.00024200758,0.00018902682,0.000377726,0.00087873527,0.0011385756,0.000011645094,0.0013154803,0.000004534071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000239091,0.000014364219,0.0004193521,0.000024016173,0.000071413815,0.000026662055,0.116363734,0.000013945443,0.00001152385,0.87999487,0.0026657004,0.00039202507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004581579,0.00008021083,0.0006030671,0.00006708041,0.000071441915,0.00014101132,0.08295067,0.000017301496,0.000004931751,0.031534806,0.8837816,0.00028971306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34656549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87148076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8811159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009904945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005744363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316724239","doi":"10.5206/tjr.2015.1.3.5","title":"Transitional Justice in Higher Education","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transitional justice review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transitional justice; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Field (mathematics); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.2526936357957652,"score_gpt":0.46793201254183087,"score_spread":0.21523837674606566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316724239","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003621916,0.032958362,0.0004598825,0.49058568,0.003033216,0.00068599946,0.00004225462,0.00009129506,0.4717811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64225316,0.075965315,0.010956689,0.23309684,0.008104065,0.0008409418,0.0013200388,0.00007831974,0.027384624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979815,0.00045202754,0.00043033142,0.00023427827,0.00065313734,0.00024876196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985201,0.0003250394,0.00010593307,0.00014019471,0.0006653242,0.00024343577],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015077023,0.00012873132,0.0002005156,0.0001318741,0.00026970802,0.00007597288,0.00017715478,0.00009209298,0.006823769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048342327,0.00013787541,0.000072184725,0.0011466175,0.00012834532,0.0010237588,0.00000471946,0.00036656728,0.0006473581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019010673,0.00048184465,0.000018039982,0.0013032283,0.000010116039,0.000003490983,0.0031240552,0.000034657503,0.000007653829,0.91116816,0.078512006,0.0053177513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026701536,0.000011341059,0.00095092336,0.0009758896,0.00048469572,0.000010919401,0.0027573886,0.000006505522,7.1505275e-7,0.006881978,0.9874566,0.0001960284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005045905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028801453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9089446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027798192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004465995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317017778","doi":"10.1086/657959","title":"Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. <i>Limits of Legality: The Ethics of Lawless Judging</i>.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Pp. 354. $65.00 (cloth).","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2193559932793061,"score_gpt":0.3851364791892516,"score_spread":0.16578048590994549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317017778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02370419,0.0006506029,0.0016997259,0.24359095,0.002890519,0.0007218336,0.00014486523,0.00014272559,0.7264546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97632915,0.0045352736,0.0012446898,0.0035840713,0.00023544727,0.0000041820103,0.000014926448,0.000021745842,0.014030493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678504,0.0014779856,0.0003778137,0.00022482671,0.00084735925,0.00028699075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946927,0.0028439676,0.0005299242,0.00047989827,0.0013519813,0.00010153509],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063793426,0.00013700518,0.00022529498,0.000058472342,0.0010183854,0.000067107525,0.00077566283,0.00062006805,0.00033278298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048069265,0.00012209902,0.00011259199,0.0007363994,0.0013362508,0.00074073253,0.000090847345,0.002744707,0.0000060801945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005214839,0.00016953258,0.0026055558,0.00007152982,0.000055723867,9.893466e-7,0.12738407,0.000008308231,0.000044046457,0.8551116,0.014119776,0.0003767335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023537593,0.00003202203,0.0019535497,0.000044627086,0.00006636294,8.3524543e-7,0.022714183,0.000011335214,0.0009296986,0.00506236,0.9688025,0.00014711221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046584703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010284074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95468277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006957575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003177406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317453076","doi":"10.1093/tandt/tts116","title":"More miseries for trustees","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.078985478390366,"score_gpt":0.44765099346444115,"score_spread":0.36866551507407513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317453076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28652027,0.0013790901,0.0005235951,0.13867731,0.008211668,0.0017357095,0.00007518878,0.00068034325,0.5621968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586886,0.000057101235,0.0036548567,0.0017500567,0.0019454086,0.00018025251,0.000024866971,0.000024267683,0.033674546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985739,0.00011912624,0.0002638512,0.00017294184,0.00031011296,0.00056004233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998678,0.00050817145,0.00014536825,0.00022510522,0.0002290099,0.00021429735],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008777824,0.00014058947,0.00016523419,0.00011117327,0.0009433816,0.00022824502,0.00025493596,0.0001348546,0.0023920436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013045948,0.0001343403,0.000092213944,0.00029143327,0.00027650897,0.001822355,0.000021784272,0.00018699409,0.00017991764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000707411,0.000315753,0.016287444,0.000042930747,0.000056524437,3.7196043e-7,0.14305365,0.0000040188843,0.00012269914,0.7214822,0.09601561,0.02254802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002415959,0.00002037176,0.008693332,0.000007882705,0.000037045997,0.0000012330877,0.03302155,0.0000053445933,0.0002430959,0.0015515063,0.9559882,0.00018881356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009781137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053673785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8599726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009831957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041654284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317987923","doi":"10.1017/s082932010000747x","title":"What Will Rising Law School Tuition Fees Mean for Law and Learning?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Political science; Higher education; Sociology","score_opus":0.024142012751307906,"score_gpt":0.3124235704158381,"score_spread":0.28828155766453023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317987923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6377639,0.003901977,0.0004462991,0.08473177,0.0048126504,0.0008184478,0.00007619121,0.000040563442,0.26740816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97849965,0.0005560066,0.0009513521,0.017167507,0.00042310692,0.000007642171,0.000010579818,0.000021589802,0.0023625907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858737,0.00026894515,0.00034872998,0.000188115,0.000106279345,0.0005005806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997308,0.00046173902,0.00031461671,0.00009605504,0.000588103,0.0012314831],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025120988,0.00013342415,0.00024492602,0.000051736664,0.0026823014,0.0009813318,0.00012759185,0.00018833,0.00017380512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085603003,0.00015500399,0.00014985392,0.00020513602,0.0006438354,0.0026487322,0.0000050159047,0.00071639474,0.0000012305968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023246212,0.0000073876213,0.00010334373,0.000023823637,0.000050568317,0.0000046771165,0.07341797,0.000007046876,0.00001611208,0.9246683,0.0012669804,0.00043142677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038964386,0.00006436276,0.00006411297,0.00009488686,0.000060783856,0.000062550214,0.1357145,0.000010263934,0.000011606082,0.05017468,0.8131717,0.00018094335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23899947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8874037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87449366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069401803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021468133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318172477","doi":"10.1515/zfrs-2007-0205","title":"Conducting Law Reform Research: A Comparative Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law reform; Commission; Law; Political science; Legal research; Economic Justice; Public law; Comparative law; Legal profession; Sociology","score_opus":0.6853262751232253,"score_gpt":0.6079270627646128,"score_spread":0.07739921235861247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318172477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0247616,0.00021638753,0.00014946963,0.033694606,0.00090338953,0.0004347414,0.000005494483,0.0002509494,0.93958336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990507,0.00004829577,0.0021417264,0.0010742113,0.0008229944,0.000031051968,0.000010675194,0.000012536692,0.0053515276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678576,0.00093153294,0.0003779236,0.0004153517,0.0006152065,0.00087425206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946596,0.0026909958,0.00018199254,0.00032730403,0.0019283011,0.00021182299],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012407171,0.00014314333,0.00022145359,0.0002696704,0.0023890832,0.00024896392,0.00046994293,0.00026305293,0.00066725945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060822223,0.00012491524,0.000068038724,0.0017155112,0.0013538281,0.0011055524,0.00009549361,0.001581359,0.0007162524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004143186,0.00009152896,0.00012217711,0.0000019963677,0.000026052357,0.0000061376045,0.056561798,6.7246793e-7,0.0005618676,0.9378971,0.0039086873,0.0007805735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000143462,0.000072647555,0.00029534212,0.000011744943,0.0000060430525,0.000003025859,0.25901553,0.00000128292,0.0021237978,0.01008792,0.72809285,0.00014633613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06171508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027268728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9657454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041124265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011147602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318217376","doi":"10.1017/s082932010000795x","title":"An Update on Self-Regulation in the Legal Profession (1989–2000): Funnel In and Funnel Out","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Funnel; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02574672302466721,"score_gpt":0.32095760051785915,"score_spread":0.29521087749319197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318217376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78745896,0.0010863782,0.00002168745,0.1995955,0.0018354424,0.00029694787,0.000040564322,0.0000053183044,0.009659225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813171,0.00061758707,0.0003023804,0.01583516,0.0006251292,0.000008702103,0.000017624698,0.000020362082,0.0012559721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977651,0.00052755733,0.00060535985,0.00026611236,0.00017635238,0.0006594679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980674,0.00027075378,0.00040330584,0.0001913579,0.00025995346,0.0008072558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003274318,0.0002083554,0.00031494736,0.00015186578,0.00088845985,0.00037284827,0.0002998295,0.00034483362,0.00009713808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001919168,0.00020384256,0.000114561706,0.0006409821,0.0005288142,0.0018367148,0.000008519697,0.0013876333,0.0000043346677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007660324,0.00008160284,0.00047041633,0.000036706366,0.000025687195,0.000047735193,0.32697144,0.00015673181,0.0000089094,0.6692264,0.00071316137,0.0022535757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023335782,0.00042372785,0.03096382,0.00071915006,0.00011014749,0.00024239531,0.39055273,0.0002850383,0.000006296908,0.075061835,0.4987124,0.00058887753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9526441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59416455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021780645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057136826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W231854594","doi":"","title":"Educación legal y formación docente: el rol de los centros de enseñanza y aprendizaje","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Repositorio Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (Universidad de Buenos Aires)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Face (sociological concept); Socratic method; Curriculum; Selection (genetic algorithm); Pedagogy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.015103818391318276,"score_gpt":0.3134715078457857,"score_spread":0.2983676894544674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W231854594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5016927,0.000525504,0.0026435887,0.0075943805,0.0020324949,0.00094911933,0.0005374074,0.00056133873,0.48346344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778532,0.0009874712,0.0018599846,0.0011835758,0.0018263825,0.000025936342,0.00014318396,0.00013617675,0.015984116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99284,0.0009467291,0.00094595074,0.0012670839,0.001461529,0.0025387208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99411166,0.0010489017,0.0010686268,0.0009600599,0.0009204749,0.0018902686],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011317332,0.00097208,0.0007870818,0.001714362,0.0034846033,0.0052275606,0.0020012816,0.0013023949,0.00070158014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009913981,0.0012804379,0.00079040986,0.0026741421,0.0017949629,0.008250998,0.00042673876,0.0022096995,0.00031767008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016788465,0.0030834682,0.033843897,0.00028413042,0.00096819224,0.0036051308,0.038398124,0.00062852283,0.002057481,0.87124467,0.0359595,0.008248027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028321764,0.00043483294,0.03004653,0.00060325227,0.0006812261,0.0016834355,0.019299956,0.00073826656,0.001261133,0.004974117,0.93579257,0.0016525226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049479645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015486638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.899833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00799356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017983269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318940133","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007730","title":"Dossier on the <i>Arthurs Report</i> on Law and Learning: A Reaction from University of Quebec in Montreal (UQAM)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scholarship; Order (exchange); Political science; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.019298836677354193,"score_gpt":0.26439424827288704,"score_spread":0.24509541159553286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318940133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8240175,0.0000805647,0.000003691201,0.024938349,0.0002688904,0.00008636911,0.000014996296,0.0000026581092,0.15058693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99219954,0.00013489125,0.00004388854,0.0033121787,0.00008188459,4.9270193e-7,0.000004980554,0.00000629745,0.004215835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989936,0.000333356,0.0002188868,0.00013283236,0.00009152787,0.00022984599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842006,0.00056376145,0.00033133707,0.00010403847,0.000189018,0.00039181023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015444924,0.00007925359,0.00016846634,0.000042230862,0.0008596791,0.00008224553,0.00009486077,0.00012412987,0.00014024439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059082464,0.0000795081,0.00008350014,0.00024833882,0.00048505014,0.00032299833,0.000003116505,0.00071660546,9.669959e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007924199,0.00001898071,0.00068863505,0.000003944579,0.000038050504,0.00006496611,0.09753096,0.000013808568,0.000015581925,0.89919126,0.0016828317,0.0007430334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041706406,0.000066986715,0.011335437,0.000069773436,0.00003864244,0.00003582169,0.1548102,0.000007843073,0.0000076549595,0.012142679,0.82094026,0.00012765071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92952895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8870486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005609619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001636418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66120434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319535774","doi":"10.3167/hrrh.2010.360304","title":"Shadowing the Bar: Studying an English Professional Elite","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Bar (unit); Competition (biology); Core (optical fiber); Position (finance); Political science; Process (computing); Sociology; Public relations; Law; Engineering; Business; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.08105632324191664,"score_gpt":0.41991560577496617,"score_spread":0.33885928253304953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319535774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018238543,0.00092106947,0.003631796,0.14760563,0.07916971,0.0012625499,0.000011790652,0.0021451032,0.7470138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8894192,0.00014969817,0.0064800247,0.0030116807,0.0074840807,0.00040179337,0.00002248885,0.00004919377,0.09298185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971818,0.0007070852,0.00049621164,0.00044442917,0.00072138367,0.00044912394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691296,0.0007599589,0.00023662692,0.0005904603,0.0011655473,0.00033443834],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020587547,0.00019933422,0.00019429935,0.00029134375,0.006622652,0.00030130235,0.0005673758,0.00023175748,0.0012670582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004627605,0.00016672017,0.00013022126,0.0014654885,0.0003106632,0.001819816,0.000052320334,0.0019944438,0.00009920754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039469505,0.00082398206,0.0005201969,0.000006226701,0.000026616328,0.0000023716627,0.14409554,0.0000059051317,0.0019239449,0.69543,0.15135019,0.0057755723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009166491,0.000048976992,0.00033144833,0.000009260141,0.000027939303,0.0000031842021,0.0055446457,0.000014276811,0.000019237892,0.0056073987,0.98807865,0.00022329013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009839844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0132531095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87118065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033173556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002010404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319666798","doi":"10.1017/s1472669611000892","title":"Report of a Session at the CALL/ACBD Conference, Calgary 2011: The Effects of Interdisciplinary Research on Law Libraries","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Library science; Political science; Association (psychology); Law library; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.08984568146905832,"score_gpt":0.4084472954281127,"score_spread":0.3186016139590544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319666798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009894095,0.000015488227,0.0003859463,0.02097511,0.00055115245,0.0007055535,0.000002423105,0.000022538741,0.9674477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97591305,0.000032418087,0.00027582675,0.0009616333,0.00003863411,0.00009454329,0.000019982204,0.0000033806016,0.022660542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983817,0.00031924556,0.0004220214,0.00007692022,0.0006426805,0.00015744938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855375,0.0003796747,0.00033880482,0.00035815136,0.00033473302,0.0000348671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019650261,0.00006555544,0.00008305245,0.00014460228,0.00089083886,0.00015003557,0.00036461634,0.000048361548,0.0006222756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001881499,0.000038474594,0.000041078027,0.0004454926,0.00053276104,0.0021873584,0.00038516626,0.00027340295,0.0001193298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004727529,0.00007074684,0.00006129733,0.000082963685,0.00002586252,0.0000027813917,0.039445348,0.0000035119697,0.000003848046,0.8620283,0.09511603,0.0031120311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017469705,0.00012005772,0.007479359,0.000098460296,0.000022743028,0.0000020383732,0.031967595,0.00005185105,0.0009800616,0.008808054,0.9502162,0.000078930614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005122227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068547885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9660189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006591329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001741675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7743309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321495429","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007468","title":"Legal Consciousness and Its Significance for Law and Society Teaching Outside Canadian Law Schools","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal profession; Doctrine; Scrutiny; Legal research; Political science; Legal education; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Legal doctrine; Subject (documents); Comparative law; Public law; Philosophy of law; Private law; Sociology","score_opus":0.026472178704418314,"score_gpt":0.3154139645957446,"score_spread":0.2889417858913263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321495429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4382429,0.0031720444,0.00019542727,0.10337869,0.0029937194,0.0014440758,0.000693837,0.00003904373,0.44984025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96783143,0.00021410252,0.0012395724,0.028386263,0.00037186497,0.000018656125,0.000010693579,0.000030388383,0.0018970006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796444,0.00024755392,0.00046656374,0.00031393926,0.00012860731,0.0008789045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958266,0.000527315,0.00032124534,0.00014045624,0.0006255745,0.0025588076],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031151515,0.00021781342,0.00038689264,0.0000614851,0.003838228,0.0008233487,0.00021156517,0.0002907781,0.00006585638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080801186,0.00025519,0.0001942794,0.0002011215,0.00081656914,0.001363615,0.000008414984,0.0010663444,0.0000010027891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019824602,0.000007113998,0.00015011373,0.000044510038,0.00008969224,0.000012368663,0.050483365,0.0000033442034,0.000030150615,0.9443973,0.0045611877,0.00021890058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057362136,0.000052253647,0.0001159907,0.00007551154,0.000089040666,0.00011246487,0.083850354,0.000030644063,0.000015650345,0.020029234,0.8947286,0.00032661637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9103143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99465334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.924368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011274297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008224629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323674988","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2015.1113971","title":"Early legal careers in comparative context: evidence from Canada and the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Race (biology); Value (mathematics); Capital (architecture); Political science; Comparative case; Sociology; Legal profession; Law; Gender studies; Geography","score_opus":0.054818361773509426,"score_gpt":0.3956026218112003,"score_spread":0.3407842600376909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323674988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68592167,0.00008471772,0.000039553357,0.31139895,0.0020957165,0.000085710184,0.000008557996,0.00000200594,0.00036311368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956078,0.000088169945,0.000025017896,0.0025343157,0.00028817705,0.0000032790854,0.0000011649532,0.000002859692,0.0014492464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979964,0.00080160843,0.0003332484,0.00007191712,0.00069445797,0.0001024001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965266,0.0021148429,0.0004571164,0.00007879606,0.000774914,0.00004773271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010682618,0.00006213271,0.00010791014,0.000079625665,0.00023414017,0.00019338435,0.00057762134,0.000033836353,0.00008312641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017867316,0.000027434282,0.000034375593,0.00022179553,0.00029146124,0.0011500588,0.00006630397,0.00040396964,0.0000023066068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048194043,0.00023573168,0.32159942,0.000007323194,0.0005379787,0.000075872194,0.31701234,0.00024648293,0.0028349918,0.23744065,0.09923533,0.015954481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043581743,0.000052995732,0.28167853,0.002001614,0.000049130093,0.000018185725,0.08514784,0.00015455527,0.0013392572,0.008887074,0.6160648,0.00024781615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9354727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7631164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5168295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003697409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018332541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3252114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323996072","doi":"10.1017/s0021223715000230","title":"The ‘Unique Role’ of Government Lawyers in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Public sector; Law; Private sector; Public administration; Population; Work (physics); Politics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.018267270709527578,"score_gpt":0.3250305103093783,"score_spread":0.30676323959985075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323996072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018823384,0.022556903,0.0000041583903,0.3517998,0.0003263783,0.0004202354,0.000017152192,0.000006998899,0.6229861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369179,0.05207258,0.000040949515,0.008850904,0.000039954477,0.000044209377,3.9330368e-7,0.0000037227012,0.002029376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991291,0.00020695754,0.00020316668,0.00005837075,0.00029530787,0.00010706788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919224,0.00046113197,0.00012154524,0.0001364477,0.00005522398,0.000033392458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091308105,0.000034486504,0.0000818052,0.0000028224945,0.00013110277,0.00001294067,0.0001654986,0.000012548699,0.00020372629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004932712,0.000018722529,0.000018886489,0.00019848319,0.00007884566,0.00015036577,0.0000114864515,0.000060814225,0.0000141346845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.979799e-7,0.0000068334707,0.0008629304,0.000021703085,0.000003551046,1.7258749e-7,0.00012256078,2.1422213e-8,0.000015551033,0.9635651,0.0063990294,0.029001808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026637026,0.0000018332092,0.0003964345,0.00031265785,0.000004936333,1.421293e-7,0.0007957938,8.4876746e-8,0.000045596964,0.00089560676,0.99748963,0.000030656534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9749955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99680537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045354548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015390427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27301955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326021517","doi":"10.5553/elr.000051","title":"Canadian Civil Justice: Relief in Small and Simple Matters in an Age of Efficiency","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Austerity; Political science; Optimism; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08564345820256092,"score_gpt":0.3962839436971032,"score_spread":0.31064048549454226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326021517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23735659,0.034693033,0.000017975859,0.31797215,0.0010332606,0.0017745978,0.000025382738,0.000047617024,0.4070794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730833,0.004150425,0.00025535273,0.022142174,0.00005231622,0.000021668226,0.000024954163,0.000006757729,0.00026301006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990537,0.0002711257,0.00026443347,0.000121474404,0.000107552114,0.0001817161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994097,0.000097401185,0.000077028744,0.00013388082,0.000093176466,0.00018882944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017106376,0.00005451351,0.00015174036,0.00008522986,0.00008761373,0.000048572867,0.00013293029,0.000039508854,0.00015991161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007380378,0.00005428709,0.0000119869155,0.000719529,0.00008980464,0.00029392226,0.000009724429,0.00015632271,0.000023239174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070501574,0.00035333578,0.016257338,0.0016115018,0.0000061371393,0.000045635024,0.0524159,0.000020060366,0.000024171739,0.8815499,0.036083624,0.011625334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113887036,0.00001737345,0.002170493,0.00030788095,0.000013038455,9.2305805e-7,0.0012704292,0.00000428078,5.972097e-7,0.0009881998,0.9950341,0.000078784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70001394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9780357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9589505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016028376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010904673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30198368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327300000","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007456","title":"Teaching Is Part of Legal Education","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Assertion; Subject (documents); Object (grammar); Sociology; Work (physics); Pedagogy; Political science; Law; Public relations; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.024668246677942172,"score_gpt":0.32433085248164956,"score_spread":0.2996626058037074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327300000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43349004,0.0006447989,0.000055876273,0.043740112,0.002521138,0.00016035282,0.000037193422,0.000006474506,0.51934403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97794485,0.00011009454,0.0007906521,0.010581014,0.00038623638,0.0000029073435,0.000004117206,0.000011745904,0.010168371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883795,0.00021866536,0.0003880375,0.000117617834,0.000103050996,0.00033469565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798495,0.00018470158,0.00038538917,0.00012007551,0.00053754327,0.0007873671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020427634,0.00009155061,0.00020110985,0.000073012125,0.0008482348,0.00015245005,0.00014935441,0.00012582645,0.00043233257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078186503,0.00010685447,0.00015505766,0.00022381006,0.00033449338,0.00079224276,0.0000032531748,0.0005770253,0.0000016069415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.955449e-7,0.000017978835,0.00027316055,0.000017135391,0.000037101694,0.0000020111336,0.10827536,9.2648236e-7,0.000011101883,0.877066,0.012544618,0.0017539082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012894305,0.00002637646,0.00014444733,0.000052503718,0.00003755535,0.00003959545,0.09608137,0.0000017724416,0.000014320578,0.013177105,0.8901904,0.00010559921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3783788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60605884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8776458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005320382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010990331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99461645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328940675","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2366537","title":"Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02977344866634638,"score_gpt":0.38826856471512633,"score_spread":0.3584951160487799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328940675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021861084,0.02871575,0.0000021308974,0.9075646,0.000093242175,0.00052580365,0.0000019431213,0.000009868207,0.060900595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401871,0.037558462,0.000082629784,0.021762988,0.00019136544,0.00004088591,6.071436e-7,0.000003283806,0.0001727082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988937,0.00032801914,0.00018823681,0.0001237078,0.0003401526,0.0001261758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985048,0.00078390725,0.00013574192,0.00023080232,0.000276999,0.00006772602],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002893096,0.0000622397,0.00017518809,0.000020787884,0.0006132053,0.0001326102,0.0003079196,0.000041867628,0.00016000189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027615733,0.000029138155,0.00003923361,0.0008304307,0.003377001,0.00048470552,0.000068635614,0.00043400735,0.000024999645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015013826,0.000016032242,0.000010407266,0.000046384477,0.000007446619,2.614125e-8,0.0008160541,1.0697799e-8,0.00000812531,0.99259824,0.0008221574,0.005673601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010722232,0.00000594417,0.00029729135,0.00012563933,0.000055419125,0.0000011909266,0.00022251136,0.0000043792816,0.000004462585,0.7837602,0.21537136,0.000044426004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066525914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033295466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009499792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019843645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330257850","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1291","title":"Book Review: Law and Risk, by the Law Commission of Canada (ed)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Commission; Political science","score_opus":0.01100334463601157,"score_gpt":0.2992388737836095,"score_spread":0.288235529147598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330257850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003794998,0.050371844,0.0000143264915,0.09594906,0.00022016495,0.000091676164,0.000013771585,0.000005721665,0.8532955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86161786,0.029024888,0.0003412198,0.07854496,0.00065516273,0.000008658314,0.000011792399,0.000017148595,0.029778292],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986716,0.00041871285,0.00028375917,0.000073979994,0.00038482004,0.00016713484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895304,0.00027507925,0.00034516572,0.000116220086,0.00021012775,0.000100362464],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012508787,0.000066034256,0.000110700305,0.00000769965,0.0022318892,0.0001451707,0.0001834784,0.000039128627,0.0012053556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015028653,0.000046115565,0.000029919582,0.000120459714,0.0002824996,0.000428371,0.000015839589,0.00051409507,0.0000034041423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014941269,0.000016840053,0.00004081309,0.0000063071516,0.0000051365014,5.8092667e-7,0.0001314035,9.2782307e-7,0.0000074565455,0.47370648,0.52597755,0.000105006984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009581975,0.000008669725,0.000055260407,0.00007710725,0.00002922701,0.000016703218,0.00039363757,0.000001767999,0.00007324056,0.0066707465,0.99251854,0.00005929803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99221915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86157995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007604586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005688346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333643508","doi":"10.1086/678914","title":"<i>Suspicious Gifts: Bribery, Morality, and Professional Ethics</i>. By Malin Åkerström. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 2014. Pp. xviii+191. $49.45.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Sociology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Database transaction; Permission; Sociology; Download; Media studies; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web; Database","score_opus":0.058147107119854484,"score_gpt":0.394211659544747,"score_spread":0.3360645524248925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333643508","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3324856,0.0012383388,0.0007989997,0.65663576,0.002733519,0.00017272242,0.000008440861,0.000037615675,0.0058890115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98116344,0.0005842429,0.0016343594,0.012827935,0.0009464151,0.0000027642911,0.000015556549,0.000017515871,0.0028077962],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967161,0.0015945138,0.00058109115,0.0002072409,0.00054580567,0.0003552801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965758,0.0009190561,0.001018132,0.00012576158,0.00084373844,0.0005175473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038136924,0.00014801642,0.00036971268,0.00011427612,0.0004620319,0.00018728069,0.00031101046,0.00028055237,0.00027002636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001653509,0.0001355905,0.00009037638,0.00037998403,0.0020888986,0.0016467068,0.000023332832,0.0018685996,0.000034390272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017351324,0.0002026691,0.013442926,0.0000062573654,0.00012703477,0.000006816086,0.09712066,0.000008255774,0.00019000837,0.015223383,0.8603707,0.013127791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082216924,0.00047762645,0.0034018431,0.000019750514,0.000063658335,0.0000725181,0.11926481,0.0000024502892,0.000027064238,0.0055372748,0.87009627,0.00021456557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032395355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016110669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6486778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023051545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008716005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99690366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335623464","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007444","title":"Le <i>Rapport Arthurs</i> vingt ans plus tard: «commentaire sur les commentaires»","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.036089680922355975,"score_gpt":0.29646500317141966,"score_spread":0.2603753222490637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335623464","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27481124,0.010468077,0.00024478353,0.49721178,0.007496556,0.00045009344,0.00030460698,0.000020649633,0.20899221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94535166,0.001281663,0.00044652703,0.03740874,0.00063221564,0.000008220396,0.000029175004,0.000045681576,0.0147961015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706733,0.0005512312,0.0008235397,0.00031041962,0.000199535,0.0010479302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955501,0.00046922715,0.00072886824,0.0002568613,0.00076706725,0.0022278915],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00263981,0.00031055976,0.0005510046,0.00009609456,0.002595386,0.00044449445,0.0003877051,0.00039815353,0.0009198581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004820921,0.00039906424,0.00043667146,0.0006197051,0.001591149,0.0015736206,0.000016389444,0.001407237,0.000007874167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030760311,0.00004903611,0.0010126563,0.00006810764,0.00021472962,0.00006561717,0.09763909,0.000017291679,0.0000062081517,0.806342,0.09219216,0.0023900066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007472312,0.000080593505,0.00024109622,0.00016057759,0.00013904969,0.00024064834,0.1754935,0.000016922957,0.00000928835,0.009453375,0.8130768,0.00034094224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61985934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9251109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79688865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019256279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0190683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336864278","doi":"10.1177/1556264616637965","title":"Book Review: The Ethics Police? The struggle to make human research safe","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Human research; Ethics committee; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Engineering; Public administration","score_opus":0.8321787933319287,"score_gpt":0.7426037277584595,"score_spread":0.08957506557346917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336864278","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026727894,0.0075053745,0.000023278986,0.9111153,0.00027833454,0.0014090128,0.0000130856615,0.000019277932,0.076963566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31876636,0.100596,0.00016999242,0.25363287,0.010817418,0.000482279,0.0000068594745,0.00016841186,0.31535977],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9068899,0.06674338,0.0013758182,0.0005823263,0.022002358,0.002406222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7736315,0.18489002,0.00046402743,0.002050447,0.0372959,0.001668086],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34486422,0.00022449951,0.00041744247,0.0017476154,0.018808449,0.0015800186,0.005096184,0.00076287135,0.0058728564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29602608,0.00010917821,0.0002632905,0.007119977,0.007992621,0.00079928845,0.0009553776,0.041983757,0.0013607097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008700976,0.0002687908,0.00006221676,0.00007593169,0.000036586287,0.000015311238,0.036745634,6.522872e-7,0.00038355176,0.155352,0.80488473,0.0020875956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026299187,0.001066919,0.0009171948,0.0014037212,0.000007719835,0.0000076021224,0.0154932,4.2664198e-7,0.00010604892,0.037781313,0.9428129,0.0001399692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006079794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009335356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6574824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019374331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01736731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945647},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2338889572","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1460","title":"Book Review: Gender and the Legal Profession: Fitting Or Breaking the Mould, by Joan Brockman; Scales of Success: Constructions of Life-Career Success of Eminent Men and Women Lawyers, by Sheelagh O'donovan-Polten","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.0238751257416003,"score_gpt":0.3276691625024716,"score_spread":0.3037940367608713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338889572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08763222,0.22214194,0.00038619305,0.22302286,0.0010790923,0.0020252448,0.00017745567,0.000056532554,0.46347848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97094107,0.023674663,0.00014784114,0.0031373864,0.00015452682,0.000023667451,0.0000043594696,0.000011878021,0.0019046204],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775237,0.0005689137,0.0007464872,0.00015521588,0.00051451253,0.0002624744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997624,0.0005695164,0.0010089438,0.00017930068,0.0004821026,0.00013615534],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022034056,0.00013505865,0.00034040338,0.000050084847,0.001307545,0.00017097882,0.00034639452,0.00008354193,0.0006275761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005314429,0.000076076925,0.000061684135,0.0004056666,0.0011793906,0.0009656229,0.000082378065,0.00054261985,4.6951607e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000566386,0.00043446134,0.03232528,0.00066779245,0.00077681436,0.0000043238647,0.047031917,0.000008483686,0.001002404,0.3358265,0.5748677,0.0064879446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031489737,0.00010685508,0.0019577704,0.0012396339,0.0005113734,0.00037769208,0.13281395,0.000074824995,0.00032687376,0.0031066732,0.855906,0.00042940158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018531363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004437985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8833088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005272585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038571106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339721888","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1174","title":"Law Commissions and Access to Justice: What Justice Should We Be Talking About?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Mandate; Realm; Law; Work (physics); Political science; Order (exchange); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Law reform; Business; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.19732907774695418,"score_gpt":0.4516456204491538,"score_spread":0.2543165427021996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339721888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019713016,0.0007518009,0.0005552651,0.28947395,0.0023062676,0.00016404474,0.0000059264557,0.00005445279,0.704717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96448886,0.0040580845,0.0025653383,0.025071409,0.0013088691,0.000009870221,0.0000035529222,0.000019435296,0.0024745925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981515,0.00027987626,0.00035736416,0.00020630562,0.0005956783,0.00040927355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803346,0.0005499558,0.00022258285,0.00018267187,0.0004248082,0.0005865112],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009818291,0.00014408481,0.00017079271,0.00009908146,0.0072842976,0.0026515757,0.0004763573,0.00013377184,0.0011371026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072219723,0.00013448215,0.0000539518,0.0005357339,0.00034383396,0.0053986283,0.00010285399,0.0010166174,0.0000502337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015968457,0.00010994555,0.00010519676,0.000018976172,0.000020860409,0.000032006872,0.019285604,0.00004837712,0.00006820105,0.9462073,0.031172447,0.0029151351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002410391,0.000028785582,0.0003797652,0.00013434573,0.0001517319,0.00021406889,0.02331526,0.000019488985,0.000051804094,0.010844396,0.964405,0.00021428512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028960597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09383912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96251756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011408695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005180044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340799908","doi":"","title":"Judge - Architect - Judge","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Function (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.014644710700639345,"score_gpt":0.34719465016449746,"score_spread":0.33254993946385814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340799908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44899958,0.0002470162,0.0017147715,0.15530048,0.0035273202,0.0001816335,0.000002154441,0.00011281819,0.3899142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801882,0.0005696193,0.00025724087,0.00077691127,0.0015254216,0.000004752232,0.0000019960933,0.00001086605,0.016664997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978073,0.00015476748,0.00018693873,0.00011551824,0.00030674276,0.0014286955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929196,0.00014682805,0.00014121144,0.00013416652,0.00016421078,0.00012160987],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038024592,0.000074136326,0.000075238146,0.0001301248,0.0010850959,0.00026150193,0.00031954012,0.000082111015,0.0009193475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010858462,0.000069541486,0.00006314484,0.00045202003,0.00013533514,0.0005862245,0.00001314516,0.0052982443,0.00026880702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061028913,0.00005182003,0.00082619,4.477487e-7,0.000021206433,5.288819e-7,0.0027245726,4.7020364e-7,0.0004824392,0.9516415,0.0015284873,0.04271625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013574406,0.000044696804,0.00055434724,0.000001392321,0.000010401581,0.00007442456,0.00490601,0.0000021202939,0.000025582303,0.2905861,0.7035666,0.00009255463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022211457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04132647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7020381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028905657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012736115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340814178","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12192","title":"Editors Note: Happy Fiftieth Anniversary to the <i>Law &amp; Society Review!</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Law; Grossman; History; Sociology; Classics; Political science","score_opus":0.04918775844110089,"score_gpt":0.3944599631686215,"score_spread":0.34527220472752057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340814178","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000035891696,0.18736705,0.00014736783,0.72522056,0.002545343,0.0010762016,0.00003519438,0.0001127438,0.08349197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001117739,0.6748148,0.0020528703,0.3081059,0.0031564606,0.000115561306,0.000013577477,0.000016772456,0.0116122635],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758756,0.00043777717,0.00047085847,0.0003724767,0.00068935443,0.00044197805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758786,0.00074972055,0.00028987147,0.00065507955,0.00050410506,0.00021339286],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033917932,0.00020248171,0.00035390758,0.0000010045849,0.0015756986,0.00013227478,0.00068324246,0.00013880244,0.0023605349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008650366,0.00012070462,0.0006690311,0.0011072475,0.0005441752,0.0009117301,0.00010441599,0.0004352285,0.0021235177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.4790277e-7,0.00003422856,0.000006295054,0.0004870014,0.00003470087,9.8475425e-8,0.003284218,4.9583544e-8,0.000013498274,0.074326456,0.9162309,0.0055818716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066786895,0.000009385911,0.000006846435,0.0039195525,0.00013300251,0.0000010657204,0.0005269235,1.5272917e-7,0.0000037610669,0.00036834978,0.99475616,0.0002080081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010864672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070196285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48744777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024865998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006792039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341045857","doi":"","title":"'Whack' No More: Infusing Equality into the Ethics of Defence Lawyering in Sexual Assault Cases","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Civility; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Sociology; Denial; Political science; Supreme court; Criminology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.1313409096164841,"score_gpt":0.453985020041841,"score_spread":0.3226441104253569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341045857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91793394,0.0008089436,0.0007561653,0.069828145,0.0005766048,0.000113932954,9.531407e-7,0.00001907148,0.009962258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980361,0.00028968963,0.00023001576,0.00054252223,0.00031645095,0.0000028612822,0.0000012192745,0.000006059203,0.0005750788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972628,0.0008677076,0.00032832168,0.00009915968,0.0007124079,0.0007296381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978289,0.00068047934,0.0002771853,0.00012195194,0.0010036033,0.00008785422],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020414934,0.00007043406,0.0001028289,0.00007810957,0.00045161558,0.00013731357,0.00029400486,0.00011480466,0.000018984603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013274828,0.00005641185,0.000024308156,0.00070959027,0.00022950681,0.0007452202,0.000033998447,0.004020342,0.000014514097],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051923784,0.000122006386,0.010440136,0.000007629324,0.00003667982,0.0000029281264,0.26099458,0.00027936857,0.0002220183,0.7171206,0.00047773434,0.010244432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042119386,0.00018224755,0.0007579678,0.000035433342,0.000025591842,0.00009272601,0.6954837,0.000119468816,0.000060007125,0.19550422,0.10710186,0.00021557482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061574478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16593651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52161634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012389389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027447078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341471969","doi":"","title":"The Law Practice Program: Tackling Racial Inequality in the Legal Profession?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Legal profession; Political science; Law; Practice of law; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.050738990177018474,"score_gpt":0.452882019306472,"score_spread":0.4021430291294535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341471969","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04561339,0.0012847343,0.00030293444,0.7676716,0.001770284,0.0007512015,6.250585e-7,0.00005796867,0.18254729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935515,0.0004621431,0.00015019327,0.002562319,0.001250272,0.000049562317,0.0000017972694,0.0000073028878,0.001964909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509645,0.0024261174,0.00034501124,0.00011391373,0.0007388305,0.0012797064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978899,0.000996816,0.0003355335,0.00016522754,0.0005338423,0.00007869306],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030551985,0.000081945254,0.00007852248,0.000040517116,0.0022561355,0.00092221855,0.0005352083,0.000075153665,0.000011020152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071292585,0.00004699066,0.000043206084,0.0007805279,0.00020534241,0.001827286,0.000024010058,0.0041834954,0.0000350601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057381392,0.00018717514,0.00021631936,5.1750715e-7,0.000015441497,0.0000016477372,0.030536598,0.0000025038917,0.0000011965856,0.95141864,0.001218768,0.016343797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001894512,0.000063305466,0.000057085294,0.0000036774184,0.000010418632,0.000037290214,0.24409069,0.0000058763317,8.54886e-7,0.103507556,0.6519819,0.000051937877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009690357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093042254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083896756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017543286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341510308","doi":"10.14198/raei.2015.28.02","title":"Teaching Legal English for Company Law: A Guide to Specialism and ELP Teaching Practices and Reference Books","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Mainstream; Criticism; Strengths and weaknesses; Domain (mathematical analysis); English for specific purposes; Mathematics education; Sociology; Listing (finance); Pedagogy; Law; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Library science; Business","score_opus":0.11013079988204688,"score_gpt":0.43806028253334034,"score_spread":0.32792948265129346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341510308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.618864,0.0006717205,0.0007592244,0.04994987,0.00044993917,0.0010026685,0.000023420127,0.00020561392,0.32807353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771598,0.00007005574,0.01622042,0.0022703614,0.0018728431,0.00007346351,0.000006003225,0.000019310894,0.0023077321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979761,0.00060811004,0.00036473892,0.00036387763,0.0003191711,0.00036795108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721956,0.0013582988,0.00045319082,0.00020706258,0.00045106414,0.0003108223],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046882853,0.00016100053,0.00027239163,0.000103058555,0.0014155996,0.0014334662,0.00024513568,0.000077120094,0.000005995257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02875945,0.00016018799,0.000029438099,0.00015429029,0.00021475327,0.0011927723,0.00012180393,0.0005230616,0.000003711125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023746912,0.000056281333,0.0028181653,0.00003741916,0.000023608914,0.0000022586025,0.035083983,3.903061e-7,0.0001857768,0.936326,0.020526404,0.004915909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022384955,0.000054939756,0.0006426723,0.00009887808,0.000052580508,0.000010964601,0.027648704,0.0000094576835,0.000021214215,0.0004519122,0.97058034,0.00020450492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022324804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029793154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95005393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014910066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006817744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342223182","doi":"10.63567/3y78x433","title":"Collaboration among Legal Information Providers in Quebec: CAIJ and Lexum's Shared Vision","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of open access to law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.045595924527835174,"score_gpt":0.46139923245358405,"score_spread":0.4158033079257489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342223182","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25509575,0.000012496376,0.00025864964,0.671688,0.0005966381,0.0006143977,0.000006347729,0.000007417641,0.07172027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955989,0.000026582666,0.00040414275,0.0021742634,0.00009829542,0.00001117258,0.0000018613046,0.000003181714,0.0016815667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897546,0.00014278272,0.00041837597,0.00006363991,0.00029079575,0.00010894971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985882,0.000143194,0.00044753752,0.000069310845,0.000644655,0.00010710981],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012309575,0.00005224276,0.00010728016,0.00021146392,0.00023854457,0.036881603,0.0005037302,0.000049331058,0.0002823319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011757254,0.00003771147,0.00001287345,0.00069800194,0.00007782841,0.3303696,0.00010465048,0.00012017502,0.000014371264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026485734,0.00012529516,0.024047162,0.000014102632,0.000018840237,0.000005532191,0.030837674,0.00005066075,0.0003815834,0.27961844,0.6161416,0.04849421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044368114,0.000035859306,0.044512093,0.0000852754,0.000004733215,0.0000013296805,0.002811342,0.0000045465245,0.00010544267,0.00059558486,0.9513289,0.00007121679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41238672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.591941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7405032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023589637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011488028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9641182},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2343001917","doi":"","title":"Indigenizing the Legal Academy from a Decolonizing Perspective","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Engineering; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06066647405457732,"score_gpt":0.3939842405401579,"score_spread":0.3333177664855806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343001917","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3271191,0.004741361,0.001955545,0.5358348,0.0014209028,0.0002900108,0.00000284074,0.00008640191,0.12854904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921278,0.0005765379,0.00014427844,0.0015447875,0.0017669264,0.0000070601477,0.0000010385114,0.000010098886,0.0038215218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764967,0.00040636482,0.0001835544,0.00012801128,0.00042512748,0.0012072951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900806,0.00027053227,0.00019661203,0.00007572135,0.00032291198,0.00012618239],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00462816,0.00007878988,0.00008049178,0.00007855197,0.0015093612,0.00047608468,0.0004000135,0.00008625648,0.00009159957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019351022,0.000060044124,0.000054264907,0.0005535766,0.00012627464,0.0011609714,0.000024438335,0.0038171401,0.00011613115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013399365,0.00002535821,0.0008855253,7.9676475e-8,0.000062963074,6.3212053e-7,0.05251392,0.0000049950186,0.000013870938,0.9423156,0.0016826426,0.0024810452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015932122,0.00002266841,0.0003278981,0.0000024505885,0.00001994205,0.000023904,0.2967723,0.0000048625557,0.000009037227,0.37000942,0.3325809,0.00006732339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024120478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032562144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6650086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030338585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02196891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344665724","doi":"","title":"THE ROLE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN CHARITY PROCEEDINGS IN CANADA AND IN ENGLAND AND WALES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; New england; Politics","score_opus":0.0065865599879291635,"score_gpt":0.26491094960472417,"score_spread":0.258324389616795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344665724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98253226,0.00033718688,9.1520626e-8,0.015603089,0.00010712854,0.00006189219,3.698506e-7,6.7347224e-7,0.0013573277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987171,0.0009686724,0.000004980397,0.00006034953,0.000080025005,0.0000026769478,7.313549e-8,0.0000016574193,0.0001644204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992558,0.000052254214,0.00013010444,0.000051142124,0.00012034742,0.00039035568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997374,0.00008752417,0.000079230645,0.000026870695,0.000046186222,0.000022791253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002023121,0.00003178664,0.000045742094,0.00003445964,0.00020455418,0.000055949586,0.00011364475,0.000027094067,0.0000049273226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004522225,0.000020356872,0.000005388449,0.00025146457,0.00007641454,0.00019134491,0.000012594962,0.0014899353,6.032339e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006204266,0.000008993015,0.773314,6.0748914e-7,0.0000018916359,6.770227e-8,0.005913731,3.001186e-7,0.000312527,0.21454515,0.000006953841,0.005889607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030994412,0.000010466559,0.79635435,0.000007756961,0.000002287122,0.000019389128,0.023751633,0.00005381568,0.000075063625,0.11102909,0.068328924,0.000057248766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8910229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10860376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033705472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00925977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345038841","doi":"10.5539/ies.v9n5p219","title":"Mediation Game When the Conflict Can Be Fun to Learn—A Legal Skill Learning Tool: The Integration of Knowledge Management, Learning Theory and Serious Game Concept","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Curriculum; Psychology; Conflict management; Conflict resolution; Class (philosophy); Experiential learning; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Knowledge management; Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05928437962927738,"score_gpt":0.4251315262221957,"score_spread":0.3658471465929183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345038841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41789827,0.0019278665,0.004823433,0.4595368,0.007473377,0.0011992961,0.000020943142,0.00015360357,0.106966436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911372,0.0011496824,0.00013901717,0.0015786666,0.0004713083,0.0001798702,0.000016648806,0.000011915168,0.0850809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980703,0.0007257732,0.00037537716,0.00023589029,0.00041895156,0.00017369071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553484,0.002017173,0.00036211903,0.00014818716,0.0018880446,0.000049641894],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020027286,0.00013286166,0.00013746734,0.0001824518,0.000652384,0.00020205126,0.0003161256,0.000049279603,0.00024572774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008875733,0.00007917689,0.000046703717,0.00035623086,0.0004668444,0.0006255632,0.00010548753,0.00028139492,0.00003437125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003466917,0.00007120909,0.0012301733,0.0000064234023,0.00017926606,1.3048968e-7,0.23116702,0.000027309177,0.0002465612,0.58513266,0.009415885,0.17248866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016608424,0.000032228374,0.0056759347,0.00005623961,0.00003442188,0.0000017942651,0.17015953,0.0000115945695,0.00011677119,0.0038528878,0.8197873,0.000105152336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006542042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008669109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81037146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023562528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044570424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345145232","doi":"10.29173/alr459","title":"The Dean Who Went to Law School: Crossing Borders and Searching for Purpose in North American Legal Education, 1930–1950","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Legal education; Border crossing; Law; Political science; Legal history; Sociology; Immigration","score_opus":0.027052450909913667,"score_gpt":0.4106681457515209,"score_spread":0.38361569484160724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345145232","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03532371,0.008071372,0.000075734635,0.8796769,0.00049569906,0.0019982548,0.000005413673,0.000022705906,0.07433025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90439373,0.019494362,0.0010679314,0.06282562,0.00041972173,0.0006195297,0.00000962086,0.00002918671,0.011140312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876314,0.00026957013,0.00029404782,0.00021157005,0.00017446245,0.00028720964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979427,0.0012998326,0.00014358996,0.00022616705,0.00020619051,0.00018154402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009745163,0.00009010858,0.0001579355,0.00003044762,0.0014964442,0.00071918074,0.00022587371,0.000016758186,0.00004179764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033035737,0.00005812567,0.00003769758,0.00071045256,0.00044241687,0.0008436508,0.000031889937,0.00013569856,0.00004395507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051732018,0.000033993838,0.0023332746,0.00006167778,0.0000068150925,6.247678e-8,0.0021828345,1.0754082e-7,0.0000038286535,0.773534,0.008273466,0.21356475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006501969,0.000016790073,0.0023033142,0.00043150975,0.000012431517,7.507963e-7,0.00048615306,4.6855567e-7,0.0000023695184,0.00039695928,0.99618447,0.00009973823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20475473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7997919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98791105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011291507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013495707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345987362","doi":"","title":"Addressing Access to Justice Through New Legal Service Providers: Opportunities and Challenges","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Service provider; Business; Legal service; Service (business); Internet privacy; Public relations; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.3146598599509469,"score_gpt":0.4181744215202097,"score_spread":0.10351456156926281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345987362","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006313713,0.00093331304,0.00023758039,0.74050826,0.0007438135,0.00027870736,0.000008468711,0.00013321346,0.25084293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.820522,0.006897439,0.005932529,0.11032209,0.0044282963,0.00013153384,0.000009061921,0.00006198029,0.051695056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862146,0.0001968475,0.00022146478,0.00028984193,0.00034134326,0.00032904584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984923,0.00045268724,0.00012528799,0.00023893888,0.0003254819,0.00036533078],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052996795,0.00012848627,0.00013506995,0.00005710214,0.0008484783,0.0012436229,0.0003700914,0.00009762221,0.0010774073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012164791,0.00010458626,0.000022044514,0.00032788285,0.00014132485,0.007161964,0.00010652331,0.00018510972,0.00021155822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022178465,0.00004167159,0.0000647238,0.00006844384,0.00001855284,0.0000044673147,0.017293654,9.279944e-7,0.00010372149,0.90375143,0.048153255,0.030476946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020977804,0.000019485502,0.00042309018,0.00012826257,0.0000337694,0.0000028817021,0.023079248,5.273988e-7,0.00010031468,0.004728855,0.9710927,0.00018106287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03575522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048391186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9229395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086741595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013760823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346416080","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-14944-8_15","title":"Professors as Victim: The Poor Review Process","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Promotion (chess); Power (physics); Psychology; Control (management); Quality (philosophy); Peer review; Anxiety; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.18709301616841356,"score_gpt":0.48649699396481544,"score_spread":0.2994039777964019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346416080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[4.1927683e-7,0.00369836,0.0000015466723,0.2982751,0.00057976396,0.0006252888,0.0000032973267,0.000061698855,0.6967545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00026378446,0.0056698746,0.000029756773,0.02553198,0.0005875023,0.000065828805,0.00002399973,0.00001926499,0.967808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860597,0.00009037925,0.00027574855,0.0001874546,0.00068165374,0.00015882216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796504,0.00018950892,0.00032143074,0.0002579736,0.0011676744,0.00009836713],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017942421,0.0001396873,0.00017819343,0.00004653085,0.00054806186,0.00013587261,0.00043279259,0.00018562723,0.03009785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015005388,0.00008914211,0.00005967875,0.0001675306,0.00020497676,0.0003883871,0.000027028977,0.0006961005,0.0041317064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.43136e-7,0.000006780812,5.1187357e-7,0.000055904122,0.000011821594,3.2865006e-7,0.002966022,2.1652912e-8,1.5473399e-8,0.59137684,0.40364382,0.001937004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024828661,0.00000833837,4.7175635e-7,0.00034292828,0.000061448976,0.0000017137393,0.002314038,1.3660578e-7,2.8356243e-7,0.055079956,0.94203484,0.00013099724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011478601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012666341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53839105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010761201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045986436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99664366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346694084","doi":"10.29173/mlj913","title":"Bend or Break: Enhancing the Responsibilities of Law Societies to Promote Access to Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09176674112237272,"score_gpt":0.4146840908205873,"score_spread":0.3229173496982146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346694084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5368863,0.000026865857,0.0011920951,0.22183566,0.0023240673,0.00046605288,0.000008264973,0.00004387612,0.23721687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98284316,0.0000073716806,0.0014737981,0.012877615,0.001332582,0.000012529644,4.6658207e-7,0.0000099583385,0.0014425319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828655,0.00047086782,0.0003613015,0.00012232384,0.0004943234,0.00026463592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788785,0.0009533976,0.00019729846,0.00019344746,0.0006171575,0.0001508749],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003643775,0.0000854643,0.00012651217,0.000060729755,0.002396505,0.0010375362,0.0005688768,0.00005321082,0.0004844328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028381252,0.000058015903,0.000050301154,0.00044021127,0.00022675216,0.0009758651,0.00008649255,0.0004177126,0.000053964006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013756071,0.000082669496,0.00007353869,0.000035498186,0.000027007482,0.0000015521399,0.0938588,0.00007733284,0.00066073186,0.8693061,0.028138004,0.0076012155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008522306,0.00009156689,0.0005439455,0.000043511434,0.000042276497,0.00001374427,0.14129595,0.0000039598485,0.001725342,0.011446568,0.8446067,0.00010120305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035969995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43797046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8578595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121863624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005234933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347121535","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4583","title":"INTRODUCTION: GRADUATE STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; CONTEST; Economic Justice; Sociology; Windsor; Law; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.2810159753811594,"score_gpt":0.48420982775155286,"score_spread":0.20319385237039345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2347121535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36364567,0.00007041257,0.00035500605,0.3004244,0.0052122194,0.00060922524,0.0000059381387,0.00013371442,0.32954344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841809,0.00001429699,0.0013762942,0.0021482867,0.0037522956,0.00002565905,0.000004003324,0.000012083178,0.008486153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998492,0.00018506945,0.00024522713,0.00019602872,0.00068241765,0.00019926684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983097,0.00013021364,0.00014399241,0.00025008403,0.00092157064,0.0002444552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016028706,0.00007643022,0.000113774506,0.00016512367,0.00022000185,0.00039483415,0.0005404361,0.000055356813,0.0007445458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036613476,0.000080225174,0.000026908177,0.00090403826,0.00010427655,0.0017560569,0.00008930147,0.00027820398,0.00054916955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015959734,0.00072175387,0.013722,0.00007492634,0.0000915472,0.000005497476,0.10760739,0.00047466622,0.00029037124,0.21863523,0.65013546,0.008081574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022687086,0.00005257175,0.031604286,0.000015844218,0.00009879525,0.000001138296,0.01877195,0.0000019294102,0.00041732786,0.0011385095,0.94751734,0.00015342656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009436084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018400085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62053525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012090691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008515373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81522536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2356862262","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Graduate Research in Law: Books & Journals","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.5203943824047375,"score_gpt":0.5435821193825338,"score_spread":0.023187736977796303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2356862262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015277108,0.0010556886,0.0000056017548,0.16472723,0.0019251178,0.0003483851,0.0000121015,0.00007776217,0.8316953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023214923,0.024065156,0.001008214,0.009948183,0.005202748,0.00011179612,0.00006794521,0.000060821334,0.9363202],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946339,0.0015994138,0.0007509598,0.00037441685,0.0019019555,0.000739323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957517,0.0019079548,0.00026021336,0.00037184104,0.0014934996,0.00021478282],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008180252,0.00017825501,0.0003069034,0.0010633838,0.0016142894,0.00096017926,0.00078087905,0.00048517773,0.0040849647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033420308,0.00017000701,0.00009725536,0.0020149306,0.0011162489,0.001164464,0.00008455596,0.0036907578,0.0009271876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029495025,0.000059766906,0.000027483862,0.000010245506,0.000010624756,0.000019225603,0.009600218,4.2747283e-7,0.0000011390292,0.26676467,0.7217893,0.0017139151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009426862,0.000015370397,0.00007491046,0.0001588232,0.0000046303976,0.0000061038154,0.009535176,0.000001132813,0.000009908336,0.02366203,0.9662408,0.00019683712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18280512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050010066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24445148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046254788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00683075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2363053423","doi":"10.29173/mlj858","title":"Introduction: The Association for Canadian Clinical Legal Education (ACCLE) Conference 2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Association (psychology); Political science; Library science; Medicine; Law; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.058009892353432894,"score_gpt":0.3816453789833114,"score_spread":0.3236354866298785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2363053423","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011679597,0.000049508944,0.00021746183,0.7444094,0.012886654,0.0005266719,0.00000422941,0.00002355364,0.23020294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525172,0.00006385099,0.0007744363,0.007698044,0.022160333,0.00008296326,0.00001440876,0.000009594025,0.016679145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851465,0.00041625882,0.0003642665,0.000121293444,0.0002851631,0.0002983401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715894,0.0003852363,0.0003475322,0.00013210501,0.0017254832,0.00025071984],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029733386,0.00006870719,0.00008664174,0.000064275155,0.0031313456,0.0018053842,0.00026739747,0.000117216296,0.003795498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019085695,0.00005547616,0.000071374474,0.00023948422,0.00011509126,0.0023005574,0.000008189391,0.00069989316,0.00069195515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018306262,0.00003855799,0.0014951691,7.2091285e-7,0.000015101146,5.8405504e-8,0.0005756809,5.795081e-7,0.0000018454097,0.45598444,0.5199448,0.021941228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009225986,0.000017498733,0.009813565,0.0000032539053,0.000022351902,0.000009027028,0.028229,0.0000071496274,0.000002499874,0.011642693,0.9500878,0.000072898154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7376685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96153253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9408376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006933658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004180538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2364586203","doi":"","title":"An Analysis on Academic Integrity and Norms of Postgraduates in Canada University of Toronto and University of Waterloo as Examples","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Regional science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09105220518055526,"score_gpt":0.4031735324975801,"score_spread":0.3121213273170248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2364586203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825753,0.01127906,0.000007388116,0.0033666983,0.000056741734,0.00016900421,0.000010857345,0.0000017618506,0.0025332097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98288244,0.016693179,0.00013256448,0.000091966336,0.000008620483,2.4404767e-7,0.000017473712,8.0138534e-7,0.00017270513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992562,0.0003440768,0.00014303153,0.0000838196,0.000106803396,0.0000660552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991774,0.00017174178,0.00024064638,0.00009237415,0.0002448985,0.00007291458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048503917,0.000046430305,0.00022713254,0.00004504299,0.000075786615,0.0000029028586,0.0000979183,0.000025180441,0.00038300658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111973546,0.000046133388,0.000017682101,0.0003680059,0.00013609539,0.0004961374,0.000010883053,0.00012750132,8.45162e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024785917,0.0003374002,0.79658955,0.00030187177,0.00008833159,5.4207227e-8,0.13228396,0.0000029706891,0.000095741896,0.05983202,0.002072453,0.008370857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006809536,0.00002683801,0.74914235,0.0002498132,0.00016890875,1.8474721e-7,0.19833373,0.000009672816,0.00006781983,0.00009607112,0.051758047,0.00007846661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98038363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96205586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06604977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002083342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002106522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41936535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2365348745","doi":"","title":"The Enlightenment of Canadian Evidence Law to Our Correlative Legislation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Legislature; Enlightenment; Political science; Haven; Common law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08229444942365018,"score_gpt":0.3878847961183556,"score_spread":0.3055903466947054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2365348745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22131766,0.00091587356,0.00030462618,0.27865165,0.0024292879,0.0004963697,0.00010229957,0.0000070324895,0.4957752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964252,0.00008355715,0.00094959745,0.00058707705,0.00029363993,0.000001997606,0.0000019218924,0.0000038085022,0.0016532061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873716,0.000117355055,0.00053267146,0.00007450996,0.00035032947,0.0001879869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978794,0.0002902951,0.000528995,0.00008980802,0.0010062705,0.0002052663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008550233,0.00007939467,0.00015622245,0.00014263354,0.00061874656,0.00012076201,0.00015710278,0.000060704762,0.000012016622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006411002,0.000060738512,0.000051965017,0.00036346144,0.0004806261,0.0008119119,0.000010446358,0.00021613449,0.0000016550639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012615975,0.00003564954,0.00028719034,0.0000055169153,0.000023264016,0.0000071315794,0.0049595353,0.000020933185,0.00008487821,0.99165076,0.0027771285,0.00013542097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014970207,0.00026227042,0.0027081124,0.00016345768,0.000043696156,0.000019865625,0.016720312,0.000005927916,0.0014002061,0.008957181,0.9694718,0.0000974419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3406745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5847054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98269355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015190967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002593294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.663716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2378917405","doi":"","title":"Thoughts on the Content Features of Moral Education in Canadian Universities","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Yangzhou University","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moral education; Content (measure theory); Moral development; Sociology; Moral disengagement; Content analysis; Pedagogy; Higher education; Political science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Social psychology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.0526203475088031,"score_gpt":0.3337267650011714,"score_spread":0.28110641749236825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2378917405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76416886,0.000029353292,0.000013006288,0.029795203,0.00051863195,0.000055796252,0.0000028057418,0.0000019897648,0.20541434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907553,0.000028622611,0.0001050898,0.00039258244,0.00016965134,9.62835e-9,5.3250557e-7,0.0000012790989,0.00854693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994492,0.00012653618,0.00010006832,0.00003345864,0.00017682754,0.00011391253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902356,0.00023730569,0.00020179996,0.00005289451,0.000387228,0.00009720285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001058335,0.000031941065,0.00006071015,0.00036027588,0.00024287522,0.000017831773,0.00018487105,0.000041517473,0.000077053286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017352482,0.000026464268,0.000037555503,0.00045461993,0.00010856624,0.00040617882,0.000005646193,0.00024276918,0.0000021909557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011871122,0.00015322816,0.023453029,0.0000027633391,0.000023197597,0.000021830743,0.037046127,0.000010904046,0.00005295719,0.9135649,0.022569822,0.002982515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013450961,0.00003339168,0.22614488,0.00002540833,0.0000120598215,0.0000027400347,0.30773982,2.9849355e-7,0.00012716235,0.00040714993,0.46533448,0.000038116934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39809287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6875738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91315776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007714003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057893028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238341325","doi":"","title":"The Plight of the Poor in America’s Legal System: A Study of the Incentives at Work in the Legal Representation of Indigent Clients in America","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Representation (politics); Work (physics); Legal research; Political science; Legal service; Law; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.01998958321063102,"score_gpt":0.2974197711198534,"score_spread":0.27743018790922236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W238341325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837028,0.000045373177,0.000019752888,0.0051794695,0.00023846688,0.00076933915,0.000009490031,0.0000048696616,0.010030449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987559,0.000014911239,0.000022099435,0.00004335321,0.000022679269,0.00000330922,0.0000031927343,0.0000038574217,0.0011306963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722916,0.001350349,0.00038521917,0.00017460315,0.00067005056,0.00019062366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980226,0.0005608254,0.0008536848,0.0003650719,0.00018028404,0.000017494904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097198825,0.0000866166,0.00020962852,0.00015469234,0.0005533,0.000047609123,0.00082325167,0.000052197225,0.000021545993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031220223,0.000057641086,0.00009642099,0.0031943445,0.0008731092,0.00047335794,0.00015880978,0.00027038011,0.0000025715035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016180438,0.0009031904,0.60788727,0.000018205728,0.000035492903,0.0000015099893,0.18790352,0.00039285677,0.00002009598,0.20185417,0.00075410533,0.000067745095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042144107,0.000031834177,0.4863032,0.000033246066,0.000024426128,3.258277e-7,0.49477535,0.000012781617,0.0000025033721,0.01501714,0.003326722,0.000051012143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18097435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15413451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30687183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031324066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036977953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86130035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2393279832","doi":"","title":"Analysis , rethink and enlightenment of the Australia forensic accounting standard","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Research Guide","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Forensic accounting; Certification; Business; Salient; Quality (philosophy); Enlightenment; Political science; Law; Public relations","score_opus":0.14358298922993992,"score_gpt":0.5111671379609292,"score_spread":0.3675841487309892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2393279832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.876703,0.000009107188,0.000005926272,0.047137465,0.00037094764,0.00015479271,0.000009552929,0.000006285387,0.07560291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98842657,0.000025092402,0.00074614724,0.00009990234,0.0001921573,0.000009037468,0.0000016020681,0.0000030582507,0.010496421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989359,0.00021036554,0.00023296593,0.00013832242,0.00028097339,0.00020152234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882096,0.00049621303,0.00011266144,0.00026176826,0.00024695325,0.000061446706],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006387843,0.000037991536,0.0000921349,0.00015771078,0.00059261423,0.00022293018,0.00026610465,0.00005728135,0.0018018372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020052143,0.000029504528,0.00004694832,0.00048370805,0.00051647564,0.0003546722,0.00007308801,0.00048497214,0.00003552866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014592373,0.000023877345,0.20831601,0.0000079576,0.0002097422,4.5621155e-7,0.017350568,0.0000151764925,0.0013093587,0.6519957,0.11348146,0.007275064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008037385,0.000009143676,0.0449616,0.000003439568,0.000029386094,3.5967258e-7,0.004539427,0.000059638172,0.0011688614,0.011784432,0.9373083,0.0000550348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02560915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03736723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82382685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013415363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008571444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395863224","doi":"10.14221/ajte.2016v41n5.1","title":"Ethics Education in Australian Preservice Teacher Programs: A Hidden Imperative?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œAustralian journal of teacher education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Medical education; Subject (documents); Teacher education; Graduate degree; Research ethics; Service (business); Psychology; Pedagogy; Medicine; Library science; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.08652072818380713,"score_gpt":0.435686180424501,"score_spread":0.3491654522406939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395863224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50223964,0.0001289671,0.00003220096,0.47802153,0.0024802124,0.00058511476,0.0000019292377,0.00002839457,0.01648198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8536801,0.000057052574,0.00097578875,0.0007016296,0.0018230199,0.000058581547,0.0000061675078,0.000019495115,0.14267819],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963724,0.001598988,0.0007694258,0.0002197384,0.0006555346,0.00038390732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709547,0.00030052505,0.00081075076,0.0003344878,0.0012156045,0.00024319292],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044660177,0.00018410925,0.00019380836,0.0003230248,0.000424759,0.00039422695,0.0007072426,0.00028814393,0.0015588991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011915871,0.00012254606,0.000107592576,0.00095459406,0.00029204326,0.0020543977,0.000021879567,0.0014676992,0.000108630804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090187095,0.004013663,0.12823524,0.000047941525,0.000087464505,0.0000017809858,0.18339981,0.0000018169077,0.0013455091,0.03403138,0.22853914,0.42020607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030888096,0.00007391648,0.06432475,0.00024924666,0.000053202602,0.000026180709,0.09492769,3.8998104e-7,0.000081238286,0.0062628775,0.8334865,0.00020515207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067474768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006522424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6049473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071662164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013773591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399619157","doi":"","title":"Legal Design Lawyering: Rebooting Legal Business Model with Design Thinking","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Design thinking; Vision; Value (mathematics); Legal ethics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Management science; Political science; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09707466619086988,"score_gpt":0.29299932040154697,"score_spread":0.1959246542106771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399619157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012356703,0.000028131772,0.28432286,0.033772647,0.00032241218,0.0006087006,0.000028742787,0.00059535255,0.66796446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9446874,0.000007189266,0.0138853425,0.0003245725,0.0002500547,0.0000047584804,0.00004550642,0.000050599006,0.040744524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733114,0.00031940488,0.00031925537,0.00051536685,0.0008085646,0.0007062482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997016,0.0005289168,0.00025668385,0.0004387925,0.0012733986,0.00048619168],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011458962,0.00035111496,0.00035602486,0.00064153684,0.001599541,0.0016246332,0.00088169763,0.0001627382,0.00004324035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012788374,0.00036119242,0.000094991774,0.003148082,0.00045333346,0.0074400697,0.0002579083,0.0006328498,0.00007644416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077226094,0.0005798942,0.0020096072,0.000020117277,0.0001726822,0.00024656724,0.012252456,0.07665504,0.00008673757,0.8684833,0.03635311,0.0023682208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001590999,0.00024148554,0.00011336852,0.00010345811,0.00012219124,0.00007864498,0.024219777,0.011611748,0.00009967513,0.0013686259,0.9594524,0.0009976096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025608358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007769551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9323307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058005156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033041094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2402247281","doi":"","title":"Plagiarism in law and medicine: challenges for scholarship, academia, publishers and regulators.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Scholarship; The Internet; Political science; Law; Public relations; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.058265321829857546,"score_gpt":0.3688328104415253,"score_spread":0.3105674886116678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2402247281","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059600285,0.0033428862,0.0000014999772,0.21553133,0.698689,0.0013921853,0.000024942497,0.00005619292,0.08036598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022486627,0.004259377,0.00018693152,0.0015755331,0.96208,0.0029847238,0.00012677995,0.0000492067,0.006250832],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812233,0.00020357365,0.00030617873,0.00040299026,0.0005691101,0.00039578308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646604,0.002527057,0.00025063605,0.00017413817,0.00034146433,0.00024065166],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006535444,0.00015935811,0.00026057087,0.00023353769,0.00041437984,0.00057230005,0.000273145,0.0031297447,0.00002260551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030402254,0.00015581377,0.000021042913,0.000265679,0.0008145681,0.0016898207,0.000045513632,0.0044311066,8.561347e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001460609,0.000015891603,0.00007003348,0.00004898667,0.000014316512,2.5352438e-7,0.004967643,8.875902e-9,2.7478367e-7,0.106925495,0.8519101,0.036032397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044118104,0.00000813143,0.0038740973,0.000022181515,0.00002647996,2.5716994e-7,0.0021627638,1.1985303e-7,7.1029103e-7,0.013919287,0.97937995,0.00016482407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003379357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016582811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26339102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010446598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005790271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404646225","doi":"10.1017/s1472669616000384","title":"Law Student Views on the Principles of a Legal Research Website: a User Experience Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Legal education; World Wide Web; Social media; Legal research; Website design; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.206851155249746,"score_gpt":0.4848951830574395,"score_spread":0.2780440278076935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404646225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101691164,0.0000043171553,0.0007020136,0.05496243,0.0003856648,0.0017487995,0.000004251278,0.000047211666,0.84045416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787183,0.000020468724,0.00016786568,0.0020690442,0.00007087423,0.0003817423,0.0000018311335,0.000003832189,0.01856607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974193,0.0004104269,0.00049095164,0.00012038509,0.0013065356,0.0002524095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985347,0.00035872005,0.00021931929,0.0004139221,0.00041817038,0.000055204386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037622498,0.00008463816,0.00009032491,0.00020589921,0.00086184044,0.000613245,0.00055804185,0.000029454197,0.0006257926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003554922,0.000049022565,0.000036260277,0.00084182376,0.0002788667,0.0039058048,0.0001596539,0.00019748096,0.00061710726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019269695,0.00023643029,0.00043447246,0.0000067423225,0.000023548444,6.270294e-7,0.052046828,0.000007149233,0.0000051376232,0.9384785,0.00593269,0.0028086011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021598693,0.00007754625,0.005771059,0.000024874724,0.000005776764,1.2802118e-7,0.10969323,0.000003325022,0.000043505745,0.0002647395,0.8838367,0.00006316456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032843845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020718386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93821377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018512778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013046249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7931871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2410112967","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v11i1.3628","title":"LegalAve: A Centralized Website for Family Law Resources in Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.08154141549679857,"score_gpt":0.40075054305839386,"score_spread":0.3192091275615953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2410112967","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021888388,0.00030290068,0.000010570042,0.7250483,0.00011784314,0.00022934393,0.0000054547427,0.0000027568517,0.25239447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860644,0.0010007418,0.00016221988,0.008345615,0.00019614055,0.0000107480655,0.0000023969715,0.000003916359,0.0042138738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834925,0.00074498274,0.00031144117,0.00004942839,0.00026459148,0.00028031686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948529,0.0042810207,0.00020225058,0.00007421542,0.0002671451,0.00032248918],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042634867,0.000048139947,0.00007642873,0.00033861276,0.0011057961,0.0012100155,0.0001866384,0.00007129138,0.00011703662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045723845,0.00002845436,0.000021234351,0.00050887,0.00049042003,0.030966878,0.000013522118,0.0003722313,0.000010958821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015164209,0.000007649403,0.0011108329,0.000010315018,0.000012043489,0.0000013565282,0.033539604,5.5051817e-7,0.0000042327974,0.9457258,0.016016083,0.0034198966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039220197,0.000049977672,0.0015882053,0.000043392898,0.000006309128,0.000013409101,0.023341702,0.0000050067497,0.000016161013,0.0048805163,0.9696171,0.000046007128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025185259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025882086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96417594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035226632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002472404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2410862563","doi":"10.3928/02793695-20090331-02","title":"Clinical Coaching in Forensic Psychiatry: An Innovative Program to Recruit and Retain Nurses","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Coaching; Forensic psychiatry; Nursing; Economic shortage; Medicine; Christian ministry; Forensic nursing; Mental health; Psychology; Psychiatry; Poison control; Medical emergency; Political science","score_opus":0.049856104522750494,"score_gpt":0.5237357448429186,"score_spread":0.47387964032016816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2410862563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6228833,0.0004954734,0.000008546797,0.37104526,0.0019833813,0.0004016058,0.0000030018225,0.000016743339,0.0031626748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744741,0.0005451544,0.010828149,0.01300808,0.0010675887,0.0000031983284,0.0000057409557,0.000007549568,0.000060466933],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998109,0.00048975355,0.0006895524,0.00016623235,0.00027759522,0.00026788327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987415,0.000077236764,0.00058592623,0.0000591475,0.00021435178,0.00032180498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002529772,0.000096041724,0.0002558653,0.00021925024,0.0006496029,0.0002040913,0.00011930759,0.0000931981,0.0000060574334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005335791,0.000091929156,0.00002746046,0.00085344794,0.00012771398,0.00086942967,0.0000043990567,0.00048370307,6.344598e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024743812,0.0009176276,0.018992987,0.000024410945,0.000008786591,5.130744e-7,0.17581882,1.6939221e-7,0.000005628733,0.013325503,0.0050281542,0.78563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017250567,0.004143776,0.2990078,0.0022354352,0.00001740138,0.000024811854,0.30502787,0.000039081384,0.0000016049024,0.025372872,0.36213315,0.0002711357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010495296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003306562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78535885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015658326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007092713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4996286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412281662","doi":"10.1007/s11016-016-0094-5","title":"The burdens of proof","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metascience","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of technology; Philosophy of biology; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Burden of proof; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049007268483185595,"score_gpt":0.3966685613835482,"score_spread":0.34766129290036263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412281662","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06458402,0.00018965549,0.0029466834,0.46861595,0.0015579816,0.000268442,0.000004077187,0.000037902995,0.4617953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97626626,0.000040590297,0.0003579911,0.00016039563,0.000052160194,0.000007208149,3.5294015e-8,9.810138e-7,0.023114376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993474,0.000100366175,0.0000957307,0.000067754074,0.00027211633,0.00011663139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903876,0.0005400731,0.000078164965,0.00013241256,0.00017998136,0.00003058989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018495574,0.000020645099,0.000029107154,0.000021695549,0.00057376263,0.000056477144,0.00028710702,0.000011346588,0.00024122081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003515136,0.000009560127,0.000016367649,0.00052648404,0.00066133094,0.00037281445,0.0000100761745,0.00003448917,0.000052833628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015551874,0.000019637508,0.0006611816,5.8005145e-7,0.0000026688958,7.375627e-8,0.0055238856,2.2687807e-7,0.007232006,0.9263139,0.005857791,0.054386493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025323709,0.0000061459455,0.0012340283,0.0000026898117,0.0000023062096,1.722249e-7,0.0015451232,9.538226e-7,0.004161361,0.006017498,0.9869815,0.00002286189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000504177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060012424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98112375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018828709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047499273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44129765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412917091","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v5n1p89","title":"The Strange Death of the Law Merchant - Part 2","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.2952731238550575,"score_gpt":0.5336090160142496,"score_spread":0.2383358921591921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412917091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062789135,0.000026573092,0.000012225748,0.3064572,0.00081334467,0.000120850935,0.000018886476,0.00000764423,0.6862644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554848,0.00010150766,0.000020983436,0.00038799344,0.0003937958,0.000024857378,9.0765127e-7,0.0000035886078,0.043581586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998028,0.00046349198,0.00014950054,0.000091626294,0.0010786181,0.00018876532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968921,0.0019003499,0.00005631144,0.00018606606,0.00092475733,0.000040411378],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030633349,0.00003174141,0.000032897897,0.00002651559,0.0010711338,0.00015489302,0.000741137,0.000033741315,0.001017596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014792057,0.000014548033,0.0000374944,0.00020932007,0.00096888986,0.00032909744,0.00007932825,0.0002205626,0.0001199828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009339245,0.00003074164,0.00043056722,5.3871236e-7,0.000014588242,1.9329404e-7,0.0008285011,1.1062693e-7,0.00027838084,0.9923812,0.0040247203,0.0020010837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006377324,0.0000069612156,0.0008563217,0.000015250745,0.0000010993108,3.657045e-7,0.00074037444,0.0000011507285,0.00081622304,0.059088204,0.9383884,0.000021859647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022582868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032103904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9492059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011758758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000563334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2413024958","doi":"","title":"The Power of Lawyer Regulators to Increase Client & Public Protection Through Adoption of a Proactive Regulation System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Power (physics); Professional conduct; Law; Political science; Business; Work (physics); State (computer science); Control (management); Public relations; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Engineering; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.02467145242439611,"score_gpt":0.31137065185377805,"score_spread":0.28669919942938193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2413024958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85170937,0.00017627527,0.045088176,0.08519425,0.0008258884,0.0012214703,0.0000041859753,0.000051993215,0.015728384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978207,0.00012237899,0.0001146968,0.000027029067,0.00016111752,0.000033492837,6.478412e-7,0.000007728974,0.0017122567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997977,0.00047569483,0.00037131764,0.0001124838,0.00046524114,0.0005982388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821854,0.0001349736,0.0005698,0.0001541899,0.00086486427,0.00005763702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004222842,0.00006833579,0.00009481105,0.00010632762,0.0006407552,0.00006759992,0.00016725161,0.000068515874,0.00002778517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011199893,0.00004142356,0.000059589853,0.00068904675,0.00012378773,0.0010081741,0.000014284055,0.00043541007,0.000013254593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009879763,0.000059641683,0.0002380049,0.0000027274978,0.000061259605,2.8282628e-8,0.0038673799,0.0000025227573,0.0013461467,0.98017603,0.00011706927,0.014030409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017384446,0.0014058843,0.022830222,0.00030070374,0.00015374819,0.00011243599,0.23462313,0.000025934285,0.0049017225,0.38580495,0.34759256,0.0005102534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013180935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024560483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5943711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015885065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00453293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8041223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W241377492","doi":"","title":"Examining the Limits of Free Expression through Canadian Case Law: Reflections on the Canadian Library Association's Code of Ethics and Its Supporting Statement on Intellectual Freedom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Intellectual freedom; Law; Ethical code; Context (archaeology); Statement (logic); Political science; Sociology; Freedom of association; Freedom of information; Human rights; Censorship","score_opus":0.19651357000822958,"score_gpt":0.42563469105890167,"score_spread":0.2291211210506721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W241377492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47536874,0.0001325992,0.00006957148,0.28534135,0.0023386863,0.00062325917,0.0001385902,0.000011315554,0.23597589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991439,0.0001507441,0.0008355156,0.0070621134,0.0001759091,0.0000099858735,0.000007725467,0.0000035453297,0.00031548736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857306,0.00021619046,0.0005410342,0.00005460209,0.00040714486,0.00020797543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954736,0.0026977644,0.0010094278,0.000114266455,0.00047745905,0.00022742985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037791573,0.00006259162,0.00008304107,0.00036601367,0.0024945838,0.00042526147,0.00027086868,0.000076018725,0.00016292016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009355954,0.00004202011,0.000022664766,0.0008648726,0.00024212114,0.023651473,0.000022146296,0.00043454225,0.000001545536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001199257,0.000033087654,0.0009047943,0.000012363997,0.00000762062,6.2471464e-8,0.1752809,0.000024611303,0.000048232603,0.80100965,0.022152577,0.00051413284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013265527,0.0001469934,0.0022339597,0.000095848896,0.000017026707,0.0000202107,0.14406122,0.00005618656,0.0041968557,0.0024961284,0.8464567,0.00008623613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015611044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016450573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8243041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001251452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009417426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414452567","doi":"","title":"Alternative Business Structures Proposals or Solving the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Legal profession; Business; Agency (philosophy); Population; Legal research; Legal opinion; Law; Legal service; Law and economics; Duty; Political science; Public law; Private law; Economics; Sociology; Black letter law","score_opus":0.0326546833478117,"score_gpt":0.3530976705772484,"score_spread":0.3204429872294367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414452567","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28078526,0.0035675175,0.010241423,0.4673375,0.0057405834,0.0018262,0.0000101904225,0.0002969436,0.2301944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98134387,0.0006363117,0.0005132686,0.0008130452,0.0014968306,0.000014292376,0.0000032695857,0.000015410269,0.015163695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747634,0.00033126769,0.0002534433,0.00013750806,0.00055670657,0.0012447614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836653,0.00013306017,0.0003076106,0.00012335816,0.00096224213,0.00010717571],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003986768,0.000113088194,0.00010900377,0.000086282664,0.001385864,0.0008838509,0.0005646722,0.00005991185,0.00015540859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052201486,0.00006603878,0.00003393508,0.0008593599,0.00013469526,0.0018931591,0.000036573376,0.0017028017,0.000033319422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054816053,0.000042376065,0.00036950593,0.0000051740385,0.00007411327,0.0000017127868,0.015525516,0.00014352029,0.000018315548,0.97658104,0.0011812169,0.0060027125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002839728,0.00006775751,0.00010187766,0.000015417078,0.000026179641,0.00012917371,0.084647745,0.00004816883,0.000029195488,0.58023924,0.3342867,0.00012458653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024232185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07271849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7005586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008486703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024718838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2420130340","doi":"","title":"Ontario's Community Treatment Orders: how did we get there and where do we go now? An advocate's perspective.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08689503484553078,"score_gpt":0.3426574971885026,"score_spread":0.2557624623429718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2420130340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43419984,0.0013154115,0.000013120877,0.3784162,0.00032193735,0.00068362075,0.0000073191313,0.00008694454,0.18495558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95634115,0.0036549387,0.00009826546,0.00025402714,0.000186571,0.00040639212,0.000006110097,0.000010363028,0.039042167],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866706,0.0005410013,0.00010528301,0.00017963565,0.00018984824,0.0003171859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990025,0.0002221998,0.00009605086,0.00028051902,0.00020619933,0.00019250179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006601585,0.00012261531,0.00012526935,0.0000678545,0.0011035495,0.0005734287,0.00019771492,0.00008749779,0.0007132332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020894867,0.00010690471,0.0000330326,0.00038230055,0.0002064568,0.0011085767,0.000025117844,0.00037014933,0.000026152557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075573895,0.0016236708,0.107925266,0.000009588148,0.0001353331,0.0000073084266,0.4642855,0.0000014440137,0.0000039419015,0.04713298,0.01506498,0.36373442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026150682,0.000039634248,0.0984728,0.0000038169064,0.000023425917,0.000002686219,0.12116945,6.4081e-7,0.00000333002,0.0031938914,0.7767171,0.00011167898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4377946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8939405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7616522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008065461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005006827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84877217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2422399802","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of the Ontario Legal Aid Plan and its effect on the service delivery of the McQueston Community and Legal Services","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Legal service; Service (business); Business; Service delivery framework; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Political science; Marketing; Geography","score_opus":0.01941092974986131,"score_gpt":0.23521312105688738,"score_spread":0.21580219130702608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2422399802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81558233,0.000030505513,0.0000018720131,0.020085225,0.00017891466,0.00022504493,0.000008934815,0.000008042457,0.16387914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94109094,0.000012931013,0.0000032186254,0.00031913235,0.000024064257,7.4657447e-7,3.520775e-7,0.0000034238726,0.058545213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982222,0.0012320658,0.00010473051,0.00009305465,0.00022199131,0.00012599447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982818,0.0010628746,0.00019565393,0.00026307438,0.00016544551,0.00003117644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067252136,0.00008440347,0.00008141097,0.000023567174,0.0018264641,0.0000799292,0.00058147265,0.00006170384,0.00088297745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007581054,0.000037113066,0.000036662906,0.0004601179,0.00030344725,0.0005515078,0.00021018418,0.00033420778,0.0000036925048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066903763,0.00020452315,0.16017151,0.00013059915,0.00019644652,0.0000015361791,0.06962342,0.000014605508,0.0033428562,0.7240768,0.00084636564,0.04072231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046617244,0.00009441687,0.08125569,0.00014768887,0.00007271714,0.0000023507832,0.034459874,0.0000135926375,0.0009430351,0.00028729578,0.88216317,0.00009402225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23770362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6731792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8813168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020285988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003591699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2422873215","doi":"","title":"The Relationship between Education, Crime and Place in Justice Policy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Economic Justice; Social policy; Population; Administration of justice; Intervention (counseling); Social change; Political science; Public economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Criminology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.035891877378939945,"score_gpt":0.39694722748907213,"score_spread":0.3610553501101322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2422873215","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40908152,0.0017700223,0.00019802543,0.51510483,0.00045214087,0.00029615112,5.18822e-7,0.00002356702,0.07307325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978581,0.0010781998,0.00005720844,0.0005571825,0.0010464139,0.000016874972,0.00000132177,0.000005826674,0.018655961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840254,0.00032638456,0.00021254609,0.00008134531,0.0001781258,0.0007990733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788845,0.0015884219,0.00014018948,0.0000873347,0.00021166762,0.00008396575],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028527332,0.00005473294,0.000051971398,0.0001436996,0.0015743601,0.00041915828,0.00018055433,0.000055799333,0.000036929454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063213203,0.000043829048,0.000015903917,0.0006655403,0.00011582951,0.0008946368,0.000011173353,0.0017225668,0.00008574596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001492582,0.000016782267,0.05817777,0.00000102242,0.0000056187064,1.4271877e-8,0.0032847133,6.144054e-7,8.4729174e-7,0.92563385,0.002123289,0.010753968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009051753,0.000014019413,0.23528406,0.0000058250084,0.00001396645,0.000009701522,0.046640716,0.0000016468867,2.9839555e-7,0.6099353,0.10794442,0.00005953747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011978776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00983167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5694995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008360886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022698177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2424580818","doi":"10.1016/s0197-2510(07)70017-7","title":"10.1016/s0197-2510(07)70017-7","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Bar (unit); Code (set theory); Computer science; Programming language; Engineering; Geography; Mechanical engineering; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.020015890308392893,"score_gpt":0.28835579083708307,"score_spread":0.26833990052869017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2424580818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020832637,0.000013197882,5.169078e-7,0.034106687,0.0000067645165,0.00013907759,0.000005324818,0.000114752234,0.96540534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000420062,4.4930883e-7,0.00020420585,0.00044013985,0.00040469918,0.00001800282,0.00000935618,0.0000087947055,0.99849427],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991595,0.00010751387,0.00014171773,0.00014063495,0.00023201303,0.00021858617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993934,0.0001419605,0.00003845736,0.00016616653,0.000121321995,0.0001386841],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004608388,0.00006530084,0.00007263042,0.000061894316,0.00044157237,0.00018341377,0.00020646832,0.000057649107,0.99946153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045052447,0.00006875355,0.000029191082,0.0005859161,0.00006403963,0.00043714594,0.000011548475,0.00015929139,0.9978482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008944892,0.000045744506,1.9386593e-7,7.8268954e-7,0.000004613739,4.411138e-7,0.00087460305,0.00000359396,0.0000032267428,0.0002606139,0.65814483,0.34065244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061465704,0.000021186412,0.000029432736,0.000004049925,0.000006740234,7.158004e-7,0.00006991912,0.0000064290484,0.000005647302,0.00006940087,0.9996251,0.0000999334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001494342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001457577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34148028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058931884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033904094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33962622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2427652008","doi":"","title":"How Scholarship Programs Impact Students and the Culture of Law School","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of legal education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Quarter (Canadian coin); Class (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Legal education; Law; Higher education; Political science; Mathematics education; Public relations; Psychology; Epistemology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.08868440015710037,"score_gpt":0.4434720842112458,"score_spread":0.3547876840541454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2427652008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8847291,0.00092287187,0.00003446801,0.032007825,0.0015428845,0.00040861216,0.0000011427569,0.0000094950055,0.08034359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962028,0.00014550594,0.0009296875,0.00050797913,0.00046671927,0.0000061984992,0.0000011364313,0.0000044176045,0.0017355239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881166,0.0003177417,0.0002626847,0.00005838093,0.00044598727,0.000103555176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998046,0.00006750461,0.00064348755,0.00009993507,0.0010110219,0.0001320415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019529639,0.00006215922,0.00011938234,0.00007604794,0.00027691788,0.00058905606,0.00028253158,0.00006000615,0.00008844761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016159284,0.000037414262,0.00007548929,0.0003236972,0.00028999802,0.0026244833,0.000013193289,0.00047215965,0.0000029899736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028249586,0.001240816,0.08560509,0.000018810782,0.00015291193,7.114975e-7,0.2166838,2.3359557e-7,0.00017575477,0.6757769,0.0050463136,0.015016153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001929701,0.0004778929,0.2348337,0.0002035921,0.00027759004,0.00009096746,0.19525203,8.4333004e-7,0.00040037272,0.04414085,0.5221449,0.00024757185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004124201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023197397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6316361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009137534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018647035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62345856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W244563248","doi":"10.26069/greynet-2020-000.202-gg","title":"Are Legal Texts Grey Literature? Toward a definition of Grey Literature that invites the Preservation of Authentic and Complete Originals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Entertainment; Order (exchange); Sociology; History; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.08399252384342462,"score_gpt":0.3382909657025428,"score_spread":0.2542984418591182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W244563248","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23422864,0.0010170558,0.13314936,0.43352908,0.0019453797,0.020823754,0.0014697966,0.00071301055,0.17312394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98605573,0.00021201941,0.008579676,0.0043330425,0.00006523661,0.0002838417,0.00022484528,0.000008445329,0.00023713722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784714,0.0004416597,0.00060685666,0.00021151657,0.0006613377,0.00023150686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964353,0.00026857754,0.0010482952,0.0002857084,0.0018300576,0.00013208037],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031488154,0.00016809831,0.00022927643,0.00030992535,0.0005480657,0.0018447569,0.00048478454,0.00018359676,0.00009185185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045560724,0.00013698581,0.00007899245,0.0021335979,0.00042567108,0.012209749,0.00009884488,0.00052205817,0.00001354474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008709868,0.00009137005,0.0030785394,0.00092980533,0.000035200777,0.0000031912457,0.19647257,0.000029481373,0.0038374308,0.77658165,0.014493762,0.0043599224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046644814,0.0000540904,0.008879502,0.0014045867,0.000049615628,0.000016460766,0.0064706057,0.0004878558,0.00981089,0.014502987,0.9575099,0.000347087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048615778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028381016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9430161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007348576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006492789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461290031","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002496","title":"In Pursuit of Pragmatic Legal Theory","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Legal positivism; Epistemology; Tort; Positivism; Economic Justice; Principal (computer security); Sociology; Legal formalism; Legal realism; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Legal research; Comparative law; Black letter law; Computer science","score_opus":0.034640150205082126,"score_gpt":0.3431281907909138,"score_spread":0.3084880405858317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461290031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12767984,0.0019356959,0.00015915607,0.1521818,0.0022945532,0.00022939043,0.000012547295,0.000007093853,0.71549994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943264,0.0000527324,0.00035016582,0.0018329711,0.0001794965,0.0000014358048,1.7895876e-7,0.000004726918,0.0032519018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998732,0.0002794998,0.00039526712,0.000061388484,0.0003126405,0.0002192065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986208,0.00033704122,0.00032305002,0.00010730271,0.0003128274,0.0002989576],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020140174,0.00005425559,0.00012985573,0.00021780969,0.00019713673,0.00015063115,0.00044808706,0.00005803185,0.0039132684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015523019,0.000054194228,0.0000441168,0.00054241484,0.00035745205,0.0013962672,0.000004533395,0.0003584951,0.000041754047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026841456,0.000028913826,0.0007491819,0.0000069328275,0.000007674969,0.00004949523,0.019177092,0.000009278029,0.000036962247,0.96721786,0.011637562,0.0010763628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014145143,0.00003613895,0.0010583104,0.00008138612,0.0000123841455,0.000034711702,0.0030229585,0.000005315911,0.000066678054,0.0156170195,0.9798446,0.0000790059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07849257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30437174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96820706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001789521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022595834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461479954","doi":"","title":"New developments at the University of Ottawa Community Legal Clinic.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal service; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Library science; Political science; Family medicine; Medicine; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10146995134018985,"score_gpt":0.33919369667282817,"score_spread":0.23772374533263832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461479954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15049556,0.000019007899,0.00006395974,0.04991889,0.000372996,0.00020831951,0.0000018172268,0.000022671838,0.7988968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8197193,0.0000376958,0.00017349246,0.00057188416,0.000048895887,0.0000032358219,0.0000035292503,0.0000016589041,0.1794403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992281,0.00035369158,0.00009330497,0.000044755638,0.00014907839,0.00013102488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927473,0.00033810452,0.00009859768,0.00013083869,0.00008776906,0.00006995164],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014486897,0.000028911847,0.0000444338,0.00002294138,0.0010574238,0.000030524985,0.00026849797,0.00003524588,0.0016614166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006764641,0.000025773386,0.000020842866,0.00041343193,0.00013630008,0.00031475822,0.000048806105,0.00021571823,0.00011752316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034023986,0.00014809793,0.11641396,0.0000027664407,0.000041965097,0.0000012353586,0.034288872,0.0000010515106,0.000001760194,0.037225228,0.54685,0.26499104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069606984,9.669614e-7,0.3490094,4.572929e-7,0.000004030139,2.941621e-7,0.0047767325,6.066018e-8,0.0000048821726,0.00012634012,0.64598626,0.000020938336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041676003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052440714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6692237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011265364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047428702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W246332609","doi":"","title":"Overview: The Rules of Professional Conduct and Their Application to the Legal Profession Online (and Off)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Scope (computer science); Permission; Legal profession; Political science; Law; The Internet; Professional responsibility; Public relations; Ethical code; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04065679517265434,"score_gpt":0.40141510232599137,"score_spread":0.360758307153337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W246332609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7373886,0.008368587,0.00034669443,0.25216404,0.00043204956,0.0003734887,0.000005964373,0.0000083853165,0.00091217784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928695,0.0034020913,0.000055268927,0.0010236271,0.0006504789,0.000017966267,0.0000041801045,0.000005319145,0.001971551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986332,0.00037353323,0.00018368654,0.00007126975,0.00019986418,0.0005384427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923277,0.0002579097,0.00019449143,0.000099947145,0.00015196318,0.000062899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003943882,0.000065476626,0.000075749595,0.000039119583,0.0009961892,0.000057269564,0.00017872176,0.00004491327,0.00002706975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032715706,0.00003114816,0.000022266257,0.00021140694,0.00012960899,0.0005160183,0.000039153045,0.0011027922,0.000005826098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021055406,0.000107719956,0.0014827545,0.000003256881,0.000023015926,8.0878735e-9,0.016644424,4.321822e-7,0.00043349635,0.89596367,0.0012850037,0.08403515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001522502,0.000052049632,0.014986292,0.000021838807,0.000019546475,0.0000350601,0.10111915,0.000016667287,0.00006917192,0.041918218,0.84153193,0.00007780374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005985205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033399882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85404545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113766575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021550246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7661983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466979818","doi":"10.5623/cig2015-408","title":"Geomatics And The Law Are Professional Misconduct and Negligence Related?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Geomatics; Law; Political science; Criminology; Engineering; Sociology; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.06463142997028548,"score_gpt":0.37380071437431034,"score_spread":0.30916928440402486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466979818","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27736837,0.00060239295,0.000043126944,0.46178964,0.0009177601,0.0004869948,0.000004179306,0.000069828486,0.25871772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98986435,0.00004750216,0.0011784853,0.0028786284,0.000092562084,0.00002389334,0.0000022118663,0.000004678279,0.005907713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990949,0.0002640484,0.00017560323,0.00009377943,0.00023934297,0.00013232125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998958,0.0005421102,0.00012549089,0.00012374858,0.00014150805,0.000109171895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013682249,0.000054856737,0.00008755171,0.000020815249,0.0006446905,0.00018994954,0.000101328566,0.000058666057,0.0001452295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018800304,0.000035810684,0.00001100927,0.00020082918,0.00074815,0.0004154294,0.000040713687,0.00019159802,0.00005608096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005417336,0.000021213122,0.00034829852,0.000008192701,0.000008525529,6.0579885e-7,0.056576993,6.4864196e-7,0.0000022693803,0.93189675,0.010492113,0.00063899974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079837587,0.000015547244,0.002149865,0.00007266925,0.000043718886,0.000017412696,0.13551699,0.00037073335,0.000011775893,0.36885428,0.49198106,0.00016759004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017276363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071736844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7124959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017911061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003046883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4958503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469770150","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n5p309","title":"A Survey of Discretionary Position in Fiqh and Objective Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiqh; Discretion; Law; Punishment (psychology); Sharia; Constitution; Code (set theory); Political science; Jurisprudence; Islam; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03496799594705648,"score_gpt":0.37278807103743167,"score_spread":0.3378200750903752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469770150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89064085,0.00018629075,0.00008273834,0.04217339,0.00020817497,0.000055057182,0.000042414023,0.0000018440695,0.06660921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911094,0.00009557475,0.00008460348,0.00044619184,0.000063642445,2.8636967e-7,7.3087523e-7,0.0000014887156,0.00019652274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948525,0.00015362944,0.00016465303,0.000030478772,0.000101709295,0.00006424754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991208,0.00041138424,0.00013587363,0.00002262507,0.00026055565,0.00004877147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007235966,0.00002373198,0.00006535918,0.000042974578,0.00009121055,0.000029738803,0.000026676355,0.000028375456,0.000035188237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003147011,0.00001650485,0.000010182881,0.000085046704,0.00022908727,0.0004162517,0.000006280989,0.000068830406,3.6986071e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078669445,0.00003442868,0.009385422,0.0000023641187,0.000005299726,7.8411927e-7,0.0024603347,6.732887e-8,0.00010089781,0.9876616,0.00013192833,0.00020898544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063264184,0.00017021991,0.7843918,0.0001277834,0.00001815873,0.000021432816,0.003984974,0.0000035023647,0.00019543158,0.14965327,0.060706697,0.00009408728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023272827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010371496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83800834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003445571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018480826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9832313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470589052","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n5p1","title":"Public Interest in Criminal Procedure and Its Challenges: An Attitude toward Iranian Criminal Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.2800798921199548,"score_gpt":0.4101240211181587,"score_spread":0.1300441289982039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470589052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75746244,0.0006582451,0.000009371283,0.2099761,0.0002645557,0.000062593244,0.0000050533185,0.0000064518304,0.031555165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99657893,0.0006552228,0.00011816206,0.0020055752,0.0004530289,0.0000012359768,2.8906848e-7,0.000005470423,0.00018210785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999165,0.00011757779,0.00026188826,0.00009095177,0.00015278468,0.00021181196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909097,0.00012831352,0.00015612794,0.000050791998,0.00032817337,0.00024564817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007127988,0.000067717636,0.00011667864,0.000096132404,0.00020283091,0.00022634913,0.00011892026,0.00006923724,0.00008393829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004070217,0.000048299415,0.000020162006,0.0000710236,0.00022127246,0.0014372509,0.000017766695,0.00021395071,0.000002710602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007476141,0.000104153696,0.00027632815,0.00003550811,0.0000076036417,0.00000835546,0.017934354,1.1590765e-8,0.00006371721,0.98027104,0.00008634667,0.001205105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012758822,0.00063753745,0.019756088,0.00034460647,0.00009815172,0.00031263853,0.06375098,0.0000065706186,0.0001358697,0.07747288,0.83587587,0.00033293996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007767964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013034556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9027982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006248418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038124097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7273588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472793850","doi":"","title":"Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Secondary Sources: Journal Articles","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.30778865034820946,"score_gpt":0.47744964868658135,"score_spread":0.1696609983383719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472793850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002788739,0.00086057297,0.0000054422917,0.22588852,0.003355445,0.00017417346,0.000050477356,0.000050482162,0.76933604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010897104,0.000625135,0.0010384759,0.009778523,0.009851605,0.000020590127,0.00010080353,0.00004429864,0.96764344],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549705,0.0012454758,0.0005372689,0.00026378682,0.0015440044,0.0009124354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99383575,0.0007208744,0.00022555342,0.00031343458,0.0036165165,0.0012878454],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011845963,0.00016362651,0.0002167047,0.0011734455,0.0030580224,0.0034926396,0.00084958883,0.00045750447,0.027863005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011763213,0.00015055416,0.000086246306,0.001471285,0.0006431998,0.0017078517,0.000052829375,0.003493769,0.0015447303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002349417,0.000020327332,0.000039524908,0.000006477199,0.000029306413,0.000021666481,0.016421827,6.2151815e-7,5.027631e-7,0.06863378,0.9062166,0.008606982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008246705,0.0000240949,0.000023214418,0.000037010297,0.000013104267,0.00002151789,0.07659037,0.0000012557334,0.0000027454091,0.010961303,0.9120591,0.00018379388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.938199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9548171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21610999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001430832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.093304515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474067469","doi":"","title":"La contribution des blogues Juridiques à la connaissance, à la critique et aux transformations du droit (The Contribution of Law Blogs to Knowledge, to the Criticism and to the Transformations of Law)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Blogosphere; Political science; Criticism; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.017330205173058593,"score_gpt":0.3568818185004466,"score_spread":0.339551613327388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474067469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044484887,0.0039139935,0.11711145,0.7913985,0.00039683442,0.0009653281,0.00020946036,0.000027030796,0.041492507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98901576,0.006812819,0.000064103544,0.0027992316,0.00025534444,0.0001095077,0.000008124866,0.000012995049,0.00092213287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955395,0.0023513795,0.0007150579,0.0001488333,0.00032876665,0.0009164818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994437,0.0031101154,0.00021631656,0.00018311467,0.0018961957,0.00015726322],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010237673,0.00017898185,0.00025226935,0.000112064765,0.0017498935,0.00025517677,0.00043051457,0.00017228411,0.000074249314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019494314,0.0001056085,0.00013188797,0.0007673048,0.0013189176,0.0013545922,0.000024424575,0.0012131085,0.000031271764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004757817,0.00018160797,0.000019625899,0.000013144927,0.000099332305,2.3244714e-7,0.042499635,0.000016472966,0.0003949522,0.9466112,0.0018847623,0.008231436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004148769,0.0002226256,0.0003694516,0.00018982567,0.0001288841,0.00013385594,0.007184003,0.000011982431,0.0011352758,0.30010557,0.68998224,0.00012138875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025666524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11279973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94453084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046200785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003983675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475256900","doi":"","title":"Patching the Gaps: Improving the Regulatory Capacity of British Columbia's Water Dam Safety Program","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.01756590143165898,"score_gpt":0.24544534883439784,"score_spread":0.22787944740273886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475256900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95822537,0.0000137761235,0.00009472734,0.014409181,0.00039118118,0.00040113583,0.00003898266,0.00008518734,0.026340444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784457,0.000039722854,0.00008333415,0.00025238277,0.00011940289,0.000002240158,0.0000039563565,0.0000068860395,0.021046372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987358,0.00039190057,0.00015296978,0.00017885824,0.00028549717,0.00025497173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989259,0.00032196278,0.00013389373,0.00028822347,0.00026592886,0.00006405579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095870957,0.000059029968,0.00008943181,0.000041796437,0.001252386,0.00020631723,0.00048796265,0.00008286212,0.00057564565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023911796,0.000045375462,0.00007225345,0.0005036391,0.0006289215,0.0008576116,0.00008096168,0.00023359696,0.000020093628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005095786,0.00040270842,0.6452124,0.00003331542,0.00013195323,0.000015202699,0.005337462,0.0000049027562,0.00025221935,0.021485677,0.1142052,0.21286799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021592632,0.000017871627,0.009446081,0.000025397898,0.000029964609,9.039452e-9,0.052619785,0.0000023370342,0.0001628362,0.00043281008,0.93694943,0.00009756253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13874556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83919406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82274425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015942831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032028748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9632467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475980159","doi":"10.29173/alr346","title":"Where Have All the Women Gone?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Assertion; Evening; Theme (computing); Law; Pleasure; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0714492684876857,"score_gpt":0.38427062855629535,"score_spread":0.31282136006860967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475980159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000723833,0.01928463,0.0000012272545,0.3160662,0.00020110051,0.00027403096,6.4069786e-7,0.000014946616,0.6634334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22686177,0.34338853,0.00012609625,0.19681717,0.00058658334,0.00033710344,0.000013301234,0.000021447508,0.23184799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999018,0.0002754968,0.00018986386,0.00011282322,0.00019576958,0.00020800463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886835,0.00058167445,0.000104646584,0.0002596268,0.000107684995,0.00007805035],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000699422,0.000064705164,0.00011994796,0.000007859602,0.0007401779,0.000059107402,0.0002648319,0.000034345827,0.00511533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008276465,0.000043399465,0.00004636095,0.0002909887,0.00022492858,0.00039454325,0.000018473345,0.00019091378,0.001297283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.264343e-7,0.000036306563,0.00018617886,0.00007375747,0.000018128016,7.653135e-7,0.019602261,5.3225072e-8,6.5713823e-7,0.7255902,0.25186932,0.0026216132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002982451,0.000005001307,0.00008217068,0.00011727456,0.000014192328,0.000005431708,0.0006184978,2.4470313e-7,5.992811e-7,0.00039322648,0.99866784,0.0000657239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056248974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05033467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7467985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066492175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031502554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476109507","doi":"10.29173/alr37","title":"A Canadian Law School Curriculum for this Age","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Law; Legal profession; Gilded Age; Curriculum; Legal education; Legal history; Practice of law; Sociology; Legal research; Political science","score_opus":0.030375680868129747,"score_gpt":0.3692208836466652,"score_spread":0.33884520277853547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476109507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000028231632,0.0021935161,0.000009568781,0.16767268,0.00039463778,0.0005274977,0.0000029904224,0.000015153497,0.82915574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36511144,0.009996784,0.0021459246,0.49276564,0.001584628,0.000814622,0.00015698606,0.000046032976,0.12737796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906003,0.00019185837,0.00020527959,0.00015161536,0.00012784867,0.00026338836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987438,0.00044753228,0.00009037007,0.00022588427,0.00018519044,0.00030724332],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096779474,0.000075387004,0.00015487384,0.000021575348,0.0007531845,0.00016712608,0.00022616796,0.000056267792,0.0043690307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003273074,0.00006800189,0.00007287376,0.0003572669,0.000087100336,0.00045599174,0.000007798944,0.0001465969,0.0013460797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.3239524e-7,0.000011307696,0.000045490826,0.000084181884,0.0000050533354,1.0940448e-7,0.00026503016,1.5129288e-8,2.5034657e-7,0.84502757,0.15314448,0.0014163642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004713776,0.000008018715,0.00000860836,0.00025325053,0.00003632138,6.344134e-7,0.0000458405,0.0000019327617,7.0852104e-7,0.002768385,0.9967281,0.000101039215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9815126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99156195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84358364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013615211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007464042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479919938","doi":"10.1080/15700763.2016.1170153","title":"Law and Education Inequality: Removing Barriers to Educational Opportunities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leadership and Policy in Schools","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Racial bias; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Racism","score_opus":0.2087072750178341,"score_gpt":0.4363714931070776,"score_spread":0.22766421808924353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479919938","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09104694,0.00011059544,0.000012214366,0.8126337,0.00023488697,0.00015201134,0.000007330776,0.000018834444,0.09578351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93267155,0.00012226458,0.00028383662,0.054173358,0.00075836794,0.00004510256,0.0000032548821,0.0000062605736,0.011935985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990367,0.00024657667,0.00018197788,0.00015879088,0.0001503597,0.00022558882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988976,0.0004476779,0.00005916888,0.000108555425,0.00009338677,0.00039361985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008180164,0.00007290579,0.00007883771,0.00024934276,0.00035473733,0.00022513483,0.000086437605,0.00007203994,0.000310967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004877946,0.00006398615,0.000011018162,0.00037635438,0.00019081953,0.00092667976,0.00001582711,0.00015185746,0.000030196814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060293337,0.000014929663,0.014840441,0.0000110237415,0.0000028060795,1.0310243e-7,0.025524693,4.948916e-8,0.000073501455,0.9339693,0.007144345,0.018412756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016982887,0.000016632755,0.017293599,0.0001351601,0.000005286715,0.0000031133482,0.14363356,2.1721378e-7,0.000032042124,0.095184095,0.74333537,0.00019112762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016477635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047073904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8416246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013009833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003188289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9900717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480981911","doi":"10.29173/alr115","title":"Justice Bertha Wilson: One Woman's Difference, Kim Brooks, Ed (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2009)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Law; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.07215943427084963,"score_gpt":0.372604035804014,"score_spread":0.3004446015331644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480981911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030488143,0.07992175,0.000021230855,0.03334178,0.0023084087,0.00074240373,0.000007490395,0.000065661945,0.8832864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32274684,0.31292167,0.001594513,0.101075776,0.004050721,0.00052932475,0.00010241745,0.00008121594,0.2568975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978536,0.00044541038,0.00044360582,0.00024824863,0.0004633976,0.0005457738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997552,0.0011552302,0.00030584203,0.00045438448,0.00023573881,0.0002968362],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089715,0.00018634973,0.00034650808,0.000024685818,0.0007141486,0.00014537218,0.0003989343,0.00011382977,0.003020608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002385696,0.00016899934,0.000099513396,0.0005205802,0.00021349118,0.001371488,0.000053085987,0.0003731115,0.0012261504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031254729,0.00024758282,0.00021098633,0.0004200288,0.00003076481,2.782875e-7,0.0015487564,7.048095e-8,0.000003119699,0.6091804,0.3816034,0.0067514884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010327608,0.000012403692,0.00034210776,0.00058235397,0.00032367822,0.0000015408652,0.00017136495,8.95552e-7,0.000006657592,0.00025767405,0.9979646,0.00023340604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07059982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056779694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6263889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008693843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032079205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482431587","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199336265.003.0006","title":"Copying and the Case of the Legal Profession","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Legal profession; Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Supreme court; Legal ethics; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.04428897900099107,"score_gpt":0.3820775970686914,"score_spread":0.33778861806770033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482431587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015739558,0.000046831945,0.000037406284,0.082162976,0.00058297324,0.00024909654,0.0000015880506,0.0000092800765,0.91675246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28823206,0.00003090152,0.00003604111,0.0011851294,0.00016849555,0.0000038882,6.186798e-7,0.0000042484094,0.7103386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945563,0.00013100034,0.000148088,0.00007590928,0.00013104705,0.000058334703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988834,0.00056524196,0.0002259111,0.00015962463,0.00014586469,0.000019914904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010383256,0.000056093228,0.00008690724,0.000022362397,0.00074574974,0.000078439196,0.00011881768,0.000103184604,0.00092143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043504153,0.000026224105,0.00003705542,0.000040460312,0.0005552932,0.000103068654,0.000042338834,0.00034962132,0.000013559152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003974054,0.0000018647626,0.000003182307,0.0000053381127,0.0000060600455,7.891628e-7,0.0048731207,5.091641e-8,6.175427e-7,0.980525,0.011557749,0.0030222123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009848061,0.00000237085,0.000004190491,0.000030202738,0.000025267758,0.000015400761,0.0036708394,0.000006215169,0.0000030880049,0.017452355,0.9786491,0.000042497108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008262566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004881152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017275112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043430532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482883559","doi":"10.1108/s1521-6136(2010)0000015006","title":"Freedom, social control, and the problem-solving court movement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Sociology of crime, law and deviance","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Originality; Dignity","score_opus":0.025113516342568375,"score_gpt":0.3213802030389978,"score_spread":0.2962666866964294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482883559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000231994,0.002337378,0.00008476245,0.06789237,0.00044855796,0.0004273068,0.000028660892,0.00002243252,0.9285265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7641068,0.0022306445,0.0020136973,0.03307287,0.0023616774,0.00007419903,0.000024778046,0.000043709028,0.19607164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894214,0.00015236238,0.000315491,0.00021595224,0.0001801768,0.00019385849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825335,0.0008148415,0.00046094932,0.000117067124,0.0003049328,0.000048853693],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013389508,0.00015080038,0.00036835726,0.000027722257,0.0012873041,0.000055738463,0.00016567197,0.0005019868,0.0002776981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015125383,0.000116503645,0.00007164321,0.000019269708,0.009927667,0.00016908936,0.000038392805,0.00082094426,0.000009590211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030129595,0.0000094277475,0.000026360796,0.00001987689,0.000068215704,3.1906038e-7,0.014109197,3.9887716e-8,0.000029373057,0.9818318,0.0034411799,0.00043410546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004951678,0.000014732457,0.00012928974,0.000014853044,0.000065307344,5.266332e-7,0.0009408277,7.0270704e-7,0.000002271507,0.41788462,0.5803561,0.000095571355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017166277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001231691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76387477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024185607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004115958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99276674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484709572","doi":"10.1017/als.2016.44","title":"Mapping the Ecology of China’s Corporate Legal Sector: Globalization and Its Impact on Lawyers and Society","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; China; Emerging markets; Politics; Political science; Economy; Economic system; Political economy; Business; Law; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.041003776972666495,"score_gpt":0.3384627227278139,"score_spread":0.2974589457551474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2484709572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9036348,0.00016797066,0.00015289144,0.06827984,0.000288339,0.00008614199,0.000013051219,0.0000062562817,0.027370736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976467,0.0006467124,0.00013744674,0.0011390967,0.00015830931,5.570548e-7,5.0279135e-7,0.0000035486307,0.00026711318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930006,0.00015354871,0.00020314845,0.00007228795,0.00015388799,0.00011708836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991109,0.00014462514,0.0004423406,0.000043391003,0.00017918022,0.00007958938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010840311,0.00006475434,0.0001216884,0.0000124200305,0.0004853315,0.000090474095,0.00006770821,0.000077423785,0.000047774713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010254378,0.000035946374,0.000083025145,0.00014637812,0.00035635201,0.00056018506,0.000013464505,0.00015802219,4.6455412e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030496183,0.00007458612,0.011109835,0.000024027062,0.00024320673,0.0000013190866,0.15061854,0.0000036430563,0.0010801874,0.8223588,0.010412326,0.0040430697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025124985,0.000727771,0.6356308,0.0002080854,0.00014497887,0.00014828004,0.11837518,0.00011360551,0.00024773434,0.019013865,0.22248408,0.00039312706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019313571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008867321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8033449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005641382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032440716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37328267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2486934769","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12214","title":"Undermining Gender Equality: Female Attrition from Private Law Practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Attrition; Private practice; General partnership; Private law; Law; Legal practice; Legal profession; Private sector; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Demographic economics; Psychology; Public law; Economics; Social psychology; Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.21529411336071347,"score_gpt":0.46049147773448973,"score_spread":0.24519736437377626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2486934769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006349785,0.07444843,0.00096828246,0.45811057,0.0008651168,0.00082843273,0.00004665427,0.00025962706,0.46383792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14227949,0.53657037,0.019630002,0.29490417,0.0014121382,0.0001652172,0.000080325175,0.000043731012,0.0049145557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997891,0.0007040143,0.0003980441,0.00028452146,0.00044718612,0.0002752158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749804,0.0013924435,0.0003536746,0.00031785626,0.00032257367,0.00011540343],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024042784,0.00011845771,0.00021789443,0.0000012998316,0.00086524844,0.00018092971,0.00021747165,0.000114453884,0.0017955361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011976177,0.000092466864,0.00018026242,0.00043515992,0.000306969,0.002050333,0.000043609194,0.00023903648,0.000586328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015972541,0.00007416199,0.00005545287,0.00014162253,0.00005056739,4.849227e-7,0.0031664884,2.0244189e-8,0.00008766848,0.96686196,0.023701869,0.00585808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014585903,0.0000064031547,0.000049981278,0.0006539636,0.000114588234,0.0000012125477,0.002292831,2.8524582e-7,0.000024835112,0.011060823,0.9854941,0.00015512742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003211215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004582254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96179223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019467548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034323463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492462256","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316337875.004","title":"A Theoretical Excursion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Legitimacy; Legal profession; Political science; Professional responsibility; Politics; Economic Justice; Morality; Practice of law; Legal realism; Scholarship; Meta-ethics; Sociology; Professional conduct; Nursing ethics","score_opus":0.06880234756513501,"score_gpt":0.30818353957069394,"score_spread":0.23938119200555893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492462256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001111554,0.00006162062,0.0000825321,0.0017778509,0.0006000861,0.0002541752,0.00006107715,0.00012517307,0.9970264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048097423,0.00006634173,0.00008248784,0.00019745309,0.00038502843,4.4239823e-7,0.0000358001,0.000018921339,0.9944038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988746,0.000112921574,0.00012135944,0.00025887106,0.00042755372,0.00020467489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861753,0.00015571734,0.0001624873,0.00028386884,0.0005337868,0.0002466043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043163134,0.00015536242,0.00016908314,0.00013339933,0.000469345,0.00010863807,0.00038111018,0.00036265806,0.0002694039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017049332,0.00018395133,0.00008998318,0.000016828197,0.00092567067,0.00021788062,0.00011169459,0.00063377345,0.000116256335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021659502,0.0000074239124,2.1798398e-7,0.000004640204,0.000018438059,0.000017857523,0.0006384134,8.400235e-8,9.207497e-7,0.7458047,0.25266173,0.0008238948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016051,0.000016441025,9.886458e-7,0.000036502675,0.00008319641,0.0000019094268,0.00064223964,0.000003467061,0.000003806397,0.0013137903,0.99752384,0.0002133113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087934884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016699796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7448621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003668494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013375302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7501318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494750886","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2016.1181035","title":"Women Lawyers and the Struggle for Change in Conflict and Transition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Transitional justice; Acquiescence; Rebuttal; Nexus (standard); Agency (philosophy); Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Transition (genetics); Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.10247198104516073,"score_gpt":0.39089551098388947,"score_spread":0.2884235299387288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494750886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33705997,0.00009929215,0.000043264845,0.62611765,0.0005535924,0.00044833912,0.000043792756,0.00001738599,0.03561672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953111,0.00014238463,0.000092077906,0.0021111718,0.00030740837,0.000044528773,6.7114445e-7,0.0000037678492,0.0019869152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937165,0.00012251787,0.00014847206,0.000073068506,0.000100258345,0.00018404199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940884,0.00031889894,0.0000845858,0.00004132524,0.000051894272,0.000094437295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011840696,0.000047566784,0.00007462089,0.000031372496,0.000634373,0.00023471798,0.00006438366,0.000047342586,0.0002231847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012162629,0.000028873708,0.0000163512,0.00009431192,0.0005112008,0.0004951558,0.0000037321392,0.0001467029,0.0000025455395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017066782,0.000034715387,0.0011233895,0.0000085093925,0.000019622386,0.0000022539457,0.18654259,5.7912537e-8,0.000088517496,0.7872668,0.005818471,0.01892444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014134826,0.00003617055,0.0019857509,0.000023712999,0.000007831162,0.000021964506,0.030882198,8.2895536e-7,0.00001654921,0.004709406,0.96083957,0.000062544634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022959192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031807944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9550211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057657962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079966296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48791483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495216519","doi":"10.1016/s1059-4337(08)45005-6","title":"Legal aid's logics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in law, politics, and society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Government (linguistics); Liberalism; Political science; Legal research; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.12893596371585034,"score_gpt":0.4129553029186293,"score_spread":0.284019339202779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495216519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007273902,0.0034457513,0.000003811691,0.010843452,0.001589551,0.00017173664,0.00004146186,0.00004867231,0.9837828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033561446,0.06472051,0.0005677074,0.011067057,0.0019688103,0.0000135754835,0.00002147185,0.00002765142,0.88805175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986733,0.00004922061,0.0003305302,0.00027329102,0.0003107327,0.000362931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998772,0.0004514694,0.0001578972,0.00016865498,0.00035633752,0.00009363298],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004748809,0.00020037784,0.00033342474,0.00003572479,0.0013897296,0.00008695764,0.0001393222,0.0003405597,0.00012774118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035652245,0.00020442721,0.0001424029,0.000042625554,0.0053245323,0.00028183428,0.000091614675,0.0007110547,0.000025464095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.5103567e-7,0.000014674682,0.000030521183,0.000026302838,0.0000819242,0.000003377639,0.08108678,1.4700962e-7,2.7502615e-8,0.80378455,0.114875086,0.00009605084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011719452,0.000014046952,0.000015892048,0.000040353632,0.00002850571,0.000002573432,0.03040538,5.3145936e-7,2.5709392e-7,0.07549492,0.8936749,0.00020544523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045726383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034012028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77879983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039964027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070373813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497896655","doi":"10.18848/1833-1882/cgp/v05i10/51909","title":"The Scientificity of Social Sciences: Questions Raised by Research Ethics in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences Annual Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Research ethics; Social science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.2883822687489082,"score_gpt":0.5544134037461772,"score_spread":0.266031134997269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497896655","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0515562,0.0077850395,0.00006635454,0.79524976,0.0045873583,0.0005400204,0.00009307191,0.000008958383,0.14011322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99338466,0.0037814446,0.00008646632,0.0017971859,0.00038372073,0.000011329048,0.0000012896157,0.000004569911,0.0005493344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934909,0.0018964102,0.0009418315,0.00018177161,0.003106395,0.00038273845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344033,0.0023503662,0.0009525386,0.00009417747,0.0031035102,0.00005905991],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033479776,0.000097997465,0.00022222516,0.00018838409,0.0053604553,0.0002562797,0.0033069197,0.000060935,0.00034104276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049638073,0.000058630972,0.00013259139,0.0024162054,0.004871937,0.0009891663,0.00041311095,0.0012128406,0.000006378464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008229495,0.000307587,0.0011509851,0.000050769806,0.00007129609,0.0000086322425,0.20303257,0.0000065883096,0.00006628276,0.3936884,0.387558,0.013976566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022671046,0.00018022918,0.0059516043,0.0010699696,0.000031920154,0.000019663012,0.31351012,0.000024736624,0.000069533264,0.03257445,0.6461208,0.00022026108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32178485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5113003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007940768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01432698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99783623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502426375","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511558696.020","title":"The conditions of India (cont.): doctors","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Accidental; Drag; Mechanics; Physics; Acoustics","score_opus":0.05553307180212803,"score_gpt":0.28542933254052855,"score_spread":0.22989626073840053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502426375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007728448,0.000051040395,0.000016928183,0.0003957898,0.0006328918,0.00028848424,0.00018625338,0.00004760149,0.9983037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015482104,0.00021597427,0.000014585188,0.00008546686,0.00015892234,9.812943e-7,0.000027688826,0.000012315305,0.98400193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915,0.000093163835,0.00018279157,0.00016736366,0.00023579075,0.00017092815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835575,0.0003752812,0.0004179123,0.00031472827,0.00043416658,0.000102168204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002902652,0.00012696585,0.0001504401,0.00011685069,0.0010468259,0.00006741634,0.00048824327,0.00022998237,0.0000836088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011311781,0.0001254057,0.00011631653,0.000021500131,0.0009796486,0.00019986095,0.00007753545,0.0004692846,0.000027763412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000115920075,0.0000074357513,0.0000052579735,0.0000056788094,0.00006721335,0.000004042092,0.001388361,3.5099188e-8,0.0000028646384,0.9010364,0.097078815,0.0003923223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009937727,0.000011741523,0.00008784026,0.000026017053,0.000099624005,5.369221e-7,0.0009026771,1.4074672e-7,0.000029919658,0.00028975485,0.9983159,0.00013647188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00480364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001861969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9012371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013020386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009505437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8051444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502837327","doi":"10.29173/alr333","title":"Re-Envisioning Regulation: &amp;ldquo;Canadian Lawyers in the 21st Century&amp;rdquo;","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Phrase; Political science; Legal profession; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08948529668300247,"score_gpt":0.379910290334667,"score_spread":0.2904249936516645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502837327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064080046,0.009112114,0.0000019928239,0.23297727,0.0003619346,0.00046253137,0.0000022717697,0.000014777611,0.75642633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78071266,0.09412178,0.0006672857,0.106522225,0.00052827643,0.000110069086,0.00013254161,0.000025158633,0.017180016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980171,0.0006414623,0.00039508252,0.00022326225,0.00038149033,0.00034165307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981306,0.0009396165,0.0001627099,0.00046490546,0.00014138776,0.00016074901],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015630967,0.00011874651,0.00018832165,0.00006937753,0.0013967165,0.00013629373,0.00040849496,0.00008580941,0.0051415698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021635816,0.000094089766,0.000080165584,0.0014521678,0.00023919503,0.00072110625,0.000015320662,0.0003657388,0.0013581963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012361133,0.0000360296,0.00073315983,0.0000487209,0.000007429663,0.0000015578009,0.012717769,0.0000014871107,5.9570243e-7,0.9136915,0.06949342,0.0032670503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056238812,0.0000033909907,0.0013891486,0.00032830943,0.000017293623,0.0000074767877,0.0012578282,2.9966827e-7,1.7570878e-7,0.00035539898,0.9964573,0.00012717018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6184048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9433459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92696387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016145887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008106043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506307306","doi":"10.29173/alr344","title":"Are Lawyers Regulatable?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Corporate governance; Legal profession; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.09495735748825214,"score_gpt":0.38935446677456337,"score_spread":0.29439710928631124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506307306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007958571,0.011494628,0.0000027361148,0.17133023,0.0003260024,0.00023768973,0.00000112341,0.000031032865,0.8157807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49895245,0.118407786,0.00061174465,0.17511018,0.0007467445,0.00013386364,0.000036215097,0.000031988944,0.20596902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912524,0.00017500162,0.0001936941,0.00013212665,0.00020342313,0.00017050991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990208,0.0003112021,0.00019532106,0.00023922788,0.00014471104,0.000088706125],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041218547,0.00006413474,0.00014579626,0.00001458453,0.0007304776,0.000037779217,0.00017284857,0.000039756134,0.0034483834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001140582,0.000058698723,0.00005297562,0.000545952,0.00020262103,0.00061082526,0.0000132225005,0.00014266644,0.001195032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.540848e-7,0.000026137013,0.0004834257,0.00007114941,0.0000065451413,0.0000014704151,0.0006614942,7.179458e-8,5.302165e-7,0.77725375,0.22097644,0.0005185474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003366096,0.000002159104,0.00050876127,0.00028175974,0.00001784397,0.0000065463146,0.00014261657,1.6419709e-7,0.0000024453327,0.00028117697,0.9986413,0.00008158215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04862059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03533657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77766484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004080657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025352664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508103237","doi":"10.1086/233378","title":"Book ReviewsAlan Gewirth, .<i>Self‐Fulfillment</i>. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998. Pp. 217. $37.50 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Permission; Library science; Management; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Physics; Economics","score_opus":0.0591796670968227,"score_gpt":0.36063943770693324,"score_spread":0.30145977061011053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508103237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028242143,0.011038561,0.00009434403,0.17318839,0.0012031944,0.0010152403,0.000038449238,0.0005781424,0.81001943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02165707,0.32636094,0.0068191183,0.057685606,0.0020595042,0.000037492475,0.0001159758,0.00007675916,0.58518755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972784,0.00092685135,0.00032524878,0.00036533512,0.00069445453,0.00040969998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982358,0.0006377165,0.00022239721,0.0004557316,0.00023627964,0.00021204192],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024371187,0.00016791641,0.00020402686,0.00003742649,0.0014303427,0.00023265775,0.0005528202,0.00034586145,0.003787354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007960732,0.00017852883,0.00008948258,0.00058381265,0.00034374057,0.0013317078,0.000057418478,0.0016074565,0.0007218943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038637216,0.00039647054,0.00078141986,0.0001002069,0.00006530325,0.000009975916,0.047977876,0.000018544873,0.000030349016,0.3250245,0.6180079,0.0075488007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019423573,0.000022085951,0.0004628696,0.000050485283,0.000041260973,0.000001748612,0.00094661146,0.000009023273,0.00004609443,0.00030290696,0.9977018,0.00022086165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050888695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089040416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3796939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030850247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002048928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509121235","doi":"","title":"Legal Services Regulation in Canada: Plus Ça Change?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Competition (biology); Independence (probability theory); Political science; State (computer science); Regulatory state; Legal profession; Law; Legal service; Financial services; Public administration; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.06529440932144626,"score_gpt":0.29974338595873123,"score_spread":0.23444897663728498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509121235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81721175,0.00071443536,0.0000063704965,0.12998614,0.0024630402,0.00032706323,0.00007653737,0.000016983622,0.049197678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518833,0.00025906306,0.00025508463,0.00063567015,0.00040000989,9.968326e-7,0.000039575087,0.000015634501,0.046510678],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754566,0.0004480119,0.0002846854,0.0004334015,0.0007565267,0.0005317203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975594,0.00016694622,0.0008925161,0.0007065126,0.00041481515,0.0002597735],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012286183,0.00021439556,0.00033839612,0.0002332436,0.0026854877,0.00025975564,0.0012656813,0.00032092078,0.003781613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002583445,0.00031358114,0.00010323733,0.0006655384,0.00057586236,0.008468736,0.00028841628,0.0008504516,0.00025419702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044319688,0.00038541426,0.76898813,0.00047166945,0.00019454953,0.00017598332,0.07977926,0.000114625036,0.00044710812,0.11163055,0.007241556,0.030127931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064592366,0.000018070787,0.6208969,0.0001719255,0.00005239174,0.0000033509477,0.013737252,0.00012058293,0.000055446613,0.0005057486,0.36355966,0.00023276311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98983735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35631812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002646829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051661944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510232616","doi":"10.3968/8571","title":"The Choice of Paths to the Transformation of the Administrative Law Enforcement Ways From the Perspective of Consultation Administration","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Administration (probate law); Enforcement; Legitimacy; Perspective (graphical); Law enforcement; Business; Public administration; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.09130537824936233,"score_gpt":0.4425809210661275,"score_spread":0.3512755428167652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510232616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.561127,0.0003470098,0.0005960212,0.3304661,0.00046791747,0.0020569668,0.0002644151,0.000028547916,0.10464599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892735,0.00021882977,0.00009088394,0.0003184558,0.000058878555,0.000080341364,0.00002841992,0.0000036268302,0.00027319384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983176,0.00057292444,0.0004984698,0.00009469112,0.00040799784,0.00010830942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99336445,0.0031553686,0.00070410216,0.00058272027,0.0021683525,0.000025022322],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012022312,0.00008275385,0.00009092142,0.000011546927,0.0018423954,0.00019164107,0.0008512031,0.000058621954,0.000057376514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033857687,0.00003245799,0.00007328384,0.00046962325,0.0016039097,0.0009629675,0.00004484807,0.00017237217,0.000006311228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005682291,0.000039194787,0.00024294018,0.000002388173,0.000024433406,2.049449e-9,0.11549765,0.00000956855,0.003116675,0.8777642,0.00044916623,0.002796929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006640609,0.00015244103,0.036483947,0.00013462239,0.00006898369,4.87003e-7,0.28234565,0.000035605848,0.045327306,0.02180993,0.61282516,0.0001518219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014329536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02335089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8559543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013984584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004334048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510525896","doi":"","title":"Barriers to Unbundled Legal Services in Australia: Canvassing Reforms to Better Manage Self-Represented Litigants in Courts and in Practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Legal service; Economic Justice; Business; Liability; Quality (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.01325277710960976,"score_gpt":0.3500922223782459,"score_spread":0.33683944526863613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510525896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8179305,0.000039708077,0.000040660474,0.17836016,0.00016642056,0.00021647292,0.0000012161132,0.000013170388,0.0032316775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946511,0.0003005549,0.00027448536,0.00252437,0.0001556099,0.000016017942,6.0613615e-7,0.000010604539,0.0020666777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972761,0.00037242917,0.00037589512,0.00023854329,0.0003376056,0.0013994067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991176,0.00021759146,0.00014756154,0.00011647008,0.00013089961,0.00026983823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004224146,0.000112422196,0.00014458674,0.000529256,0.00024028981,0.000295421,0.00023633953,0.000091594266,0.00007625322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001209406,0.00008929058,0.000018801778,0.0009859418,0.000037247566,0.0024998642,0.000039199655,0.0012704295,0.000028646758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008683391,0.00057181064,0.53838944,0.000035962938,0.00024908906,0.00020372168,0.14596593,0.00009298132,0.002554475,0.27752727,0.0008366862,0.032704256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004761322,0.0003970081,0.21133691,0.00073063624,0.00007921356,0.0003133387,0.26725727,0.00003339691,0.00026356007,0.07852515,0.4351752,0.001127005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054091904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45189512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4343385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024150803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035881605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95220697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511313682","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1227","title":"Book Review: Bar Codes: Women in the Legal Profession, by Jean McKenzie Leiper","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Law; Sociology; Legal profession; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.02238169356376893,"score_gpt":0.3714272858531344,"score_spread":0.3490455922893655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511313682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000292434,0.022318946,0.00010709486,0.2750578,0.000623759,0.00028059722,0.0000040552704,0.000021613838,0.7012937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63046527,0.02316208,0.00033355894,0.2723524,0.0015472411,0.00005604704,0.000018033306,0.000029109435,0.072036244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974628,0.00070758874,0.0004908552,0.00013911194,0.0006435876,0.00055603095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859,0.0004959674,0.00027549666,0.00018512589,0.00024675333,0.00020666028],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009981257,0.00010862334,0.00015957744,0.000057091118,0.001525286,0.00035307498,0.00048765293,0.00009174312,0.008174759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010813334,0.00007571075,0.000056020166,0.0004727635,0.0001795008,0.0014042556,0.000018982799,0.0012454484,0.0001440607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011336064,0.00014178651,0.00012372025,0.000013597834,0.000008687179,0.000012032984,0.010626702,4.1336827e-7,0.000023532417,0.23856369,0.7491115,0.0013630424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018478998,0.000023828226,0.00012185912,0.00015037206,0.000009622336,0.000025986557,0.014747879,7.187332e-7,0.000012687243,0.0027233232,0.9818913,0.000107639804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021442397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050192904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63017285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028729558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064582675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511544311","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Juries in the 21st Century, by Jacqueline Horan","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.016856877056021808,"score_gpt":0.3254235744628837,"score_spread":0.30856669740686193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511544311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020496928,0.095760815,0.000012549652,0.4112384,0.00074300333,0.00040045276,0.000010288206,0.00005817829,0.49157134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.065377995,0.100185715,0.00027910472,0.7990073,0.0021229715,0.00018015687,0.00008591674,0.000025253219,0.03273558],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982205,0.0006774757,0.00028107804,0.00017299702,0.00040438125,0.00024357467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898106,0.00034181905,0.00012126879,0.0003024942,0.00014539002,0.000107951375],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002255435,0.000093091054,0.00013178798,0.000029898922,0.0005356705,0.0002642169,0.00040206,0.000073441486,0.0060087414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002002897,0.00007140496,0.000043854423,0.00055158604,0.000198208,0.00081078784,0.000019388359,0.00046599878,0.0008081523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016766301,0.00004785483,0.00006672397,0.000015927808,0.0000023647046,2.0358497e-7,0.0012010899,1.2831411e-7,0.000008843086,0.26085654,0.73617107,0.0016275567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010215947,0.000012788312,0.00012136896,0.00006809667,0.000009887591,6.202031e-7,0.0018753357,7.422388e-7,0.000013467623,0.00048247393,0.99721277,0.00010028856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074898778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055733887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45883578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000503354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002746976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251452867","doi":"10.5040/9781472563699","title":"The First Women Lawyers : A Comparative Study of Gender, Law and the Legal Professions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Legal realism; Legal education; Empirical legal studies; Gender studies; Legal research; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.0786209816948372,"score_gpt":0.35738978530203214,"score_spread":0.2787688036071949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251452867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00091818353,0.000063733154,0.0000017779543,0.019497324,0.00072502746,0.001225745,0.000017974713,0.00005009954,0.97750014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2754798,0.0000033350298,0.000011419486,0.0013557313,0.00040375392,0.0003029396,0.000013694173,0.000014337067,0.722415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976539,0.00065411924,0.00044451913,0.00024564686,0.00068964605,0.0003121515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961383,0.0022945246,0.0006003135,0.00037552835,0.0005115611,0.00007979784],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035527523,0.00017142513,0.00029179902,0.000078363286,0.004201792,0.0038943484,0.00067019835,0.00017945883,0.000051022806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059361866,0.0001020128,0.00005456921,0.00013849411,0.0014784931,0.001260841,0.00015321978,0.0012595864,0.0000064244023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018912206,0.00004445547,0.000009876381,0.000005982335,0.000051769286,3.7346672e-7,0.15766723,4.1176975e-7,7.259664e-8,0.5363439,0.30577743,0.00007959749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005166745,0.000022989543,0.0000593776,0.000024186656,0.000037923888,5.6637725e-7,0.10305689,0.0000022028782,2.6918434e-7,0.012149476,0.8840215,0.000107951906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01614878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077150635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57824403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022822921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021870958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515792880","doi":"10.20982/tqmp.04.1.p001","title":"L'établissement d'une norme de qualification sûre dans un contexte non paramétrique","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.26147689967445187,"score_gpt":0.5972320151537616,"score_spread":0.3357551154793097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515792880","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07441711,0.0019045895,0.8022211,0.083657116,0.021836929,0.0015178282,0.00007262492,0.000050807987,0.014321898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10702613,0.0024184047,0.87622607,0.0030509531,0.0017950165,0.000918512,0.000062399566,0.000053980544,0.008448514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879634,0.009058193,0.0012810442,0.00069069955,0.0002463314,0.00076037605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883155,0.00937081,0.0009191642,0.00044812515,0.00077293447,0.00017343281],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016597703,0.00031275416,0.00066720054,0.00031858505,0.00083528494,0.000075029435,0.0004762985,0.0005488702,0.0004801765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012685328,0.00035196217,0.00017090127,0.0024418242,0.0013729238,0.0008553639,0.000026488597,0.0006837885,0.00013554549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031791275,0.0009537089,0.00299994,0.000041763105,0.00011092362,0.000004801791,0.19133739,0.000022762553,0.014124514,0.75672454,0.010715066,0.02264666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017478114,0.00059716863,0.028406562,0.00005593492,0.000082397135,0.000020971673,0.017397067,0.00023191297,0.0025878826,0.12471945,0.82368964,0.00046323324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011540571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001526629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8129746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004815331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009952404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516010411","doi":"10.29173/alr17","title":"Practical Legal Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies; Engineering ethics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.22583216168638956,"score_gpt":0.5565889154861124,"score_spread":0.3307567537997229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516010411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025779442,0.0007820625,0.000023217071,0.38577133,0.00019428474,0.00017307386,1.442271e-7,0.0000123764885,0.61301774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6624015,0.024810037,0.0037840928,0.14719553,0.002454998,0.00028630646,0.000029849018,0.00004181872,0.15899587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973835,0.0014829356,0.00021433926,0.00016698532,0.00047497498,0.00027730383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957509,0.0033546975,0.000069227426,0.00028668228,0.00040504328,0.00013343222],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005379556,0.00005463639,0.00012667279,0.000027908034,0.00077033776,0.00021381809,0.00019236213,0.000053242395,0.0036465602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018093793,0.0000479039,0.00004220232,0.00076077087,0.00029070833,0.00087498885,0.000021451706,0.0004995151,0.0036483665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.261552e-7,0.000034777586,0.000015937085,0.000053132826,0.0000031263332,2.490102e-7,0.00027883626,6.4803922e-9,8.719104e-7,0.7899219,0.20703745,0.0026531168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031050477,0.000012860409,0.000017825863,0.0001990318,0.00001325203,0.0000032406554,0.00011770225,0.0000015593639,0.0000028934596,0.0020105715,0.9975263,0.00006373773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089903034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03921012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79048884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005034411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000644853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99726427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517918421","doi":"10.1086/524879","title":"Book ReviewsCatherine Audard, . <i>John Rawls</i>.Montreal: McGill–Queen’s University Press, 2007. Pp. 328. $75.00 (cloth); $22.95 (paper).","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Economic Justice; Download; Permission; Media studies; Philosophy; Art history; Art; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07224834276563313,"score_gpt":0.3502776998650652,"score_spread":0.27802935709943205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517918421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024046485,0.009663406,0.00010297078,0.21615763,0.0015893317,0.00065296475,0.00010066639,0.00037988878,0.7711127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013334225,0.45889732,0.002431601,0.06848568,0.0017343077,0.0000286503,0.0000845378,0.00007647517,0.4549272],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997363,0.0009097516,0.0003312188,0.0003493423,0.0006571212,0.00038957607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746555,0.0009402818,0.00028524353,0.00045022077,0.0006355912,0.00022310345],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018104553,0.00018310695,0.0002449769,0.000044695273,0.0021955378,0.00007666258,0.00047525342,0.00037498822,0.0040191268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028153202,0.00019355919,0.00012306886,0.00060693297,0.0005303583,0.0013457817,0.000077923214,0.0015746584,0.0004062784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001875389,0.00012683333,0.00011909161,0.00002534252,0.000025038018,0.000014252385,0.009266175,0.0000051390966,0.000016808173,0.07013068,0.9196236,0.00062825606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024339897,0.000023774071,0.0006973814,0.00003494358,0.000032526434,0.0000049705864,0.0016303034,0.000003473885,0.000027575843,0.00025132942,0.9968176,0.00023274946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06155195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001189296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44923392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031209138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016300047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520485215","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Case Law - updated","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.3607604778427934,"score_gpt":0.5587866410292842,"score_spread":0.1980261631864908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520485215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021151446,0.00010319567,7.184386e-7,0.2530646,0.0033588815,0.00059048174,0.00017867403,0.00010071046,0.7423912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07182097,0.00020942981,0.0009179597,0.007038767,0.0062018423,0.00014023493,0.0007841072,0.000073175666,0.91281354],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915156,0.0031602706,0.0005799957,0.00065047026,0.0023099089,0.0017837562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98808223,0.0025594572,0.00012283528,0.0009563605,0.007042441,0.0012366514],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02439884,0.0002194298,0.0002621425,0.0021289238,0.0088498695,0.003473738,0.0013275832,0.0014268786,0.045383867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010877234,0.00021757395,0.000082105515,0.0046837097,0.0027295933,0.0015309954,0.00015244352,0.010320694,0.0038549327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017816969,0.000024168708,0.0000022964623,0.0000058155047,0.000013453496,0.0004270376,0.0026887537,5.548301e-8,0.0000018437717,0.46043384,0.5359752,0.0004257659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066587025,0.000023732298,0.000002529792,0.000024297271,0.000009135525,0.00010713218,0.031554855,0.0000019013963,0.000014997738,0.00535665,0.96258485,0.0002533368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99878687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45507717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012888543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049488746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520615928","doi":"","title":"Writing Up the Facts and Winning Big: Some Secrets of the Best Writers of Legal Submissions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Legal writing; Law; Political science; Computer science; Legal research","score_opus":0.03119909141947087,"score_gpt":0.33332657387440406,"score_spread":0.3021274824549332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520615928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87224776,0.00068348256,0.00023344136,0.12169721,0.0004658942,0.00009389773,0.0000025340532,0.000006145656,0.004569647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946919,0.0010817393,0.000013954135,0.000211062,0.00028909216,0.0000010212015,1.5956572e-7,0.0000054330703,0.0037056387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985445,0.00024753335,0.00025157077,0.000072824616,0.00029201276,0.0005915682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892604,0.00041058997,0.00032681954,0.00010563979,0.00018164971,0.000049276718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024986817,0.000057256253,0.00008019665,0.00005744281,0.00086406746,0.000074660675,0.00025793753,0.00004210776,0.000036575555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011160007,0.000028185495,0.00005174214,0.00031197895,0.00029658747,0.0005692513,0.000029663708,0.0008499261,0.0000019688853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010512208,0.00003171516,0.008266973,0.000003049486,0.000047173537,1.413853e-7,0.008008717,9.8639e-7,0.0064154416,0.9390959,0.00017972062,0.037939645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015956288,0.00029305968,0.019843696,0.0005458725,0.00018746748,0.00024239779,0.40659583,0.000013728027,0.0042424556,0.32054645,0.2454678,0.00042561328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012866973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014441861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61854947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016759988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047933185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85031414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522436095","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v10i1.1396","title":"Poor Justice: How the Poor Fare in the Courts (Book Review)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.1282684912989405,"score_gpt":0.46598821109252075,"score_spread":0.3377197197935803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522436095","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034184408,0.031000787,0.000014046463,0.8611939,0.002525306,0.00059205986,0.000016497941,0.000028464849,0.10428708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5668287,0.1534749,0.00009310908,0.2338928,0.007667124,0.0005770318,0.0000044055537,0.000025638825,0.037436288],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975819,0.0010718942,0.00027347598,0.00019641535,0.00051701197,0.00035929188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581075,0.0033747808,0.0002021347,0.00016836096,0.00041603716,0.000027959903],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033055262,0.00012280644,0.00020054715,0.000048709993,0.0018982945,0.00008583756,0.0005097873,0.00007835542,0.00024076122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016099965,0.00006330911,0.00005591693,0.00090683944,0.00084481854,0.00042500862,0.000074498275,0.00040736172,0.00007631362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000574888,0.000044404802,0.000033715292,0.00014130156,0.000017740149,0.0000038122816,0.061837602,9.238009e-8,0.0000040462555,0.09257618,0.84075105,0.00458431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001371813,0.000007233861,0.00043900005,0.00016712236,0.00018959607,6.923123e-7,0.24624498,2.4664456e-7,8.6972136e-7,0.0009965402,0.75173175,0.00008479308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000343064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00250253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6273011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028762533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004732051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524099781","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1307","title":"Book Notes: Access to Care, Access to Justice: The Legal Debate Over Private Health Insurance in Canada, by Colleen M. Flood, Kent Roach and Lorne Sossin (eds)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Flood myth; Sociology; Political science; Law; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02739835166410391,"score_gpt":0.3560805353952432,"score_spread":0.3286821837311393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524099781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19878717,0.008473807,0.0008687918,0.5896952,0.0027314276,0.0019406467,0.00025343226,0.00004803902,0.1972015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96019965,0.0003490051,0.0002247095,0.037835564,0.00046610003,0.00003490598,0.000009504537,0.000017213188,0.0008633154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975979,0.00037208572,0.00052909367,0.00026490155,0.000672392,0.00056368223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863267,0.0002654533,0.00030695266,0.00019057226,0.00022731729,0.00037703852],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008948892,0.00016749602,0.00022235561,0.000099419885,0.002240097,0.0023489788,0.0007589529,0.000060352595,0.0002274238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024857683,0.0001388933,0.00002917934,0.00089478324,0.00009146567,0.0018461181,0.00011355132,0.0006839789,0.000007347584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014834128,0.00029893545,0.04675825,0.00007321729,0.000046282647,0.00003526514,0.012267267,0.0035619172,0.000050037936,0.10037816,0.8245657,0.011816595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004845806,0.000036347876,0.08074831,0.00007111796,0.000015271415,0.000016138234,0.0018880831,0.000029672441,0.000073804804,0.0005509257,0.9158485,0.0002372243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7614125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011563946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005199372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99905884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524351496","doi":"","title":"LibGuides. Legal Research. How to find Canadian (Federal) and Ontario Legislation.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Public administration; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.10759323696759542,"score_gpt":0.3981531742057648,"score_spread":0.29055993723816936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524351496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012548789,0.00006042927,0.0000063369994,0.40371966,0.0022645711,0.00046561682,0.00003689849,0.00004287804,0.5921487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023877526,0.00008998811,0.002828238,0.009003931,0.0028153541,0.000074839714,0.00017873879,0.000036776266,0.9610946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713004,0.00032757694,0.0003010925,0.00051149435,0.0009252415,0.00080454885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636775,0.00074314076,0.00011974191,0.00041123465,0.00137898,0.0009791653],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031144016,0.00021341977,0.00023703545,0.001029301,0.002956004,0.004315734,0.0005358438,0.000742594,0.00984369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054483023,0.00021787839,0.000050531984,0.0010297924,0.00038354305,0.0015504733,0.00008060584,0.0030570084,0.0003686064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021809371,0.000012210376,0.00040400782,0.0000044314106,0.000015135387,0.000004297645,0.015863588,2.0763704e-7,0.0000051999114,0.10423021,0.87707067,0.0023878491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006288798,0.00002411998,0.0023855472,0.000025286103,0.000008923576,0.0000028758495,0.0036943234,7.150542e-7,0.0000048197476,0.0014062498,0.9921053,0.000278959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99847007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99992174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39471573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012173591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040238682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526759325","doi":"","title":"Research guides: Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Treatises on specific Charter topics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16179712885603312,"score_gpt":0.4478055040233525,"score_spread":0.28600837516731936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526759325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016028754,0.00041309092,0.0000091070015,0.06423533,0.001532886,0.00053278793,0.00004583609,0.00004196095,0.93158615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011730012,0.0021750766,0.0009853124,0.0012013566,0.0052526407,0.00010051498,0.00010388573,0.000026104244,0.9784251],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975934,0.00043532485,0.00044820676,0.00034974286,0.0008278903,0.00034544163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727416,0.0010111452,0.00020140053,0.00041558972,0.00097006577,0.00012761299],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001172449,0.00016951235,0.00028347893,0.00048993074,0.00061879953,0.0004222994,0.00035864403,0.00036186294,0.018292604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043478466,0.00013119909,0.000057002657,0.000543097,0.0007911095,0.00055957574,0.0000433242,0.00073635957,0.0006167163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035074822,0.00006909002,0.000028512668,0.000017938084,0.000019942896,7.0576635e-7,0.007760169,2.0080426e-8,0.0000067590827,0.20261979,0.7855227,0.003950883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010997553,0.000078169316,0.00030841283,0.00009315149,0.000009508766,6.5509437e-7,0.0047699865,9.527095e-7,0.000055509332,0.01144635,0.98297876,0.00014854397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037127353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034914813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19745609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100153375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055855856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526784809","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n8p57","title":"The Role of Jurisprudence in the Interpretation of the Law and Its Conformity with the Realities in the Law of Iran and France","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Common law; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Doctrine; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.016290494047643947,"score_gpt":0.32928795633498437,"score_spread":0.31299746228734043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526784809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87684655,0.0005583212,0.000009492214,0.0731818,0.00006149013,0.00012946293,0.000010742856,5.2614405e-7,0.04920162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819726,0.00019295624,0.000008264978,0.0014818212,0.00003429988,0.0000015627041,4.57919e-8,0.0000013049757,0.0000825057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915403,0.0002875349,0.00022816841,0.000030326617,0.00022289029,0.00007707153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983076,0.0011002957,0.0003251485,0.00008265154,0.00017038124,0.000013928764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017772848,0.000036090216,0.000078340294,0.0000131272045,0.0002617907,0.00006475437,0.00019311097,0.000023412766,0.0000027414978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020371651,0.000011596394,0.000016059392,0.00011133511,0.0010396509,0.0002940751,0.000013041728,0.00015047635,3.8502545e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011455791,0.000013753094,0.0018122209,0.00000600674,0.0000046007135,7.583091e-8,0.0622645,6.596778e-7,0.000043047196,0.9356009,0.000024532785,0.0002182427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008447088,0.0002967116,0.10103388,0.00043152663,0.00007685424,0.00003425511,0.3768165,0.00007619855,0.0014254538,0.24638243,0.2724613,0.00012017932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006729789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015703702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68921846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007840939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010848038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W252727322","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1306","title":"Book Notes: Access to Justice, by Deborah L. Rhode","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.042925887646550996,"score_gpt":0.39692365112351297,"score_spread":0.353997763476962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W252727322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021997737,0.0006460854,0.0050893454,0.14412318,0.0011024338,0.00013512507,0.000011712845,0.000051807034,0.84862036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9400481,0.00017245718,0.002465535,0.03914882,0.002176724,0.000016262371,0.000012815074,0.00002193728,0.015937345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844104,0.00020164704,0.0003283987,0.00016211334,0.0004869073,0.00037991992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986731,0.00031130615,0.00020568377,0.00014175852,0.00040702493,0.00026114215],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083095086,0.000108493834,0.00011704836,0.00008559289,0.0020728386,0.0016825824,0.00049502036,0.00009361054,0.003317435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005865812,0.000105724495,0.00005376006,0.00049631775,0.000102509075,0.0022099817,0.000035465422,0.0005655499,0.00036057495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008021533,0.00009831094,0.00018003327,0.000002884888,0.0000075136268,0.0000040987834,0.00071447756,0.000046991223,0.00012362211,0.4209466,0.5768993,0.0009681285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001597198,0.00001741239,0.00024763928,0.000015720829,0.000037171627,0.000013701156,0.0005679967,0.0000073870756,0.00021800451,0.01624048,0.9823232,0.0001515332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13374761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16136287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016956912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005440904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528596893","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1012","title":"Civil Justice Problems and the Disability and Health Status of Canadians","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07411402938534853,"score_gpt":0.43890315179963635,"score_spread":0.36478912241428785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528596893","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31391183,0.00058474357,0.000041122974,0.6039477,0.00022976633,0.00018172932,0.000015145841,0.0000038306243,0.08108414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931608,0.00055955444,0.000051127303,0.0053124684,0.00079535483,3.7222452e-7,2.704405e-7,0.0000021267688,0.0001179159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920267,0.00016013977,0.00026361697,0.0000399715,0.00015123362,0.00018238256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908566,0.000285902,0.00029975333,0.000027344951,0.00014671838,0.00015458876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027219097,0.00003611587,0.0001266166,0.000031431584,0.0007657946,0.0000711125,0.000042271255,0.00003715978,0.00000922446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039351947,0.000025785,0.000020314345,0.0001612901,0.0011499574,0.00023288712,0.00000870413,0.00018580107,8.085296e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016789598,0.00002480951,0.0017945684,0.000026783284,0.000010819626,1.1930813e-7,0.15110718,1.15740775e-7,0.0000019088,0.8415293,0.00063790096,0.0048497263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011300276,0.00008873436,0.12341929,0.000019688547,0.00006347262,0.000009007732,0.084959485,0.0000017464674,0.0000015324536,0.042011913,0.74820864,0.000086439955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55948377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40288028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7995174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010958866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012144734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6080156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W252885981","doi":"","title":"New Criminal Code Procedure for Production of Student Records in Sexual Assault Cases.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Canada","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Confidentiality; Law; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Criminal code; Parliament; Political science; Confession (law); Criminology; Criminal law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07555425503559556,"score_gpt":0.4233008312198719,"score_spread":0.34774657618427635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W252885981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8506323,0.00007182041,0.00006287695,0.13522346,0.0057632173,0.00065594533,0.00000969585,0.000014703842,0.007565986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605404,0.000017234992,0.0010898905,0.0009912705,0.0010789791,0.000103966246,0.000037975085,0.0000070393703,0.036133256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905735,0.0000631439,0.0002406817,0.00016296419,0.0003274135,0.00014844915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897796,0.00013462422,0.00015487908,0.00011312032,0.0005295775,0.00008981102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046075467,0.00005843797,0.00007636322,0.000094134746,0.00018547224,0.00003759969,0.00011419272,0.00004552268,0.0003158561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017290986,0.00006612531,0.000010563391,0.0006318842,0.000031704683,0.00033533934,0.0000043983746,0.00013238534,0.0000016602814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024939274,0.00028289284,0.03871409,0.000030295158,0.000008129416,4.9028506e-7,0.02338742,0.00002550535,0.000044666198,0.0076778135,0.89599395,0.0338098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000907918,0.000024012199,0.035395317,0.00001220722,0.000012852569,0.000005092557,0.12161864,0.000002073014,0.00005463688,0.00017536384,0.84253055,0.00007844718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96182287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99617326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1342322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006455201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04063571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.964803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529991557","doi":"","title":"Young lawyers: Greg May: How to stay out of my bad books","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin (Law Society of South Australia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Law; Public relations; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08265878807916936,"score_gpt":0.35845173333856334,"score_spread":0.27579294525939396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529991557","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21720427,0.000052453175,0.0016618689,0.531373,0.002880869,0.0013640668,0.0001789041,0.0002527888,0.24503177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9353312,0.0000076190195,0.010711364,0.00213199,0.0003914766,0.00001924297,0.000010420024,0.000016290362,0.0513804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816513,0.0002006864,0.00035768942,0.0002755093,0.00061461714,0.0003863655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984026,0.00022387762,0.00038471934,0.0003136385,0.00047502716,0.00020013194],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015724568,0.00015053031,0.0002604582,0.000028587141,0.0003903218,0.00014397732,0.00036487708,0.00019827118,0.0016829596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000539828,0.00016087054,0.00022635252,0.00027699894,0.00062256533,0.00015965602,0.000048953356,0.0003183665,0.00026579606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002180237,0.00014189348,0.005176425,0.00008549633,0.00009659692,2.4572523e-7,0.19403835,0.000009402406,0.0006619622,0.19370916,0.60550815,0.0005505522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000256349,0.000054386262,0.0014960063,0.000039509763,0.000033715667,2.6177108e-7,0.053003214,0.000001773959,0.0005358342,0.00057786907,0.9438159,0.0001852059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007934649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050027197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7181269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068628564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021405236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530013195","doi":"10.1177/2322005816662375","title":"Understanding University Pro Bono","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Sustainability; Subject (documents); Public relations; Business; Public administration; Library science; Geography","score_opus":0.12476259210413694,"score_gpt":0.3679861138520459,"score_spread":0.24322352174790896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530013195","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016759025,0.000028994362,0.010549646,0.51163614,0.0029415821,0.00010911793,0.000001460602,0.000017925924,0.45795614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98400295,0.000033887598,0.0009376105,0.0002598851,0.00063435675,2.7445677e-7,4.5034594e-7,0.0000040523696,0.014126553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924994,0.00017332866,0.0001772195,0.00006199003,0.00022182625,0.00011571634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989802,0.00009832257,0.0003379243,0.00007128673,0.00038990253,0.00012231836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007213734,0.000043716598,0.00006459775,0.00020428756,0.00033078482,0.000099972036,0.00015856761,0.00004262041,0.000494745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007828745,0.000034922927,0.000044428576,0.00041807978,0.00010648982,0.0022357905,0.0000055192186,0.00015437504,0.0000335174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025392714,0.00013691848,0.0022551839,0.000002566352,0.000017268405,0.0000020829225,0.012017561,2.1789742e-7,0.0002057318,0.90639824,0.050386198,0.028552648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015220248,0.000031459705,0.0023034448,0.000046461933,0.000016578166,0.000015322701,0.06010584,1.3787455e-7,0.000038826154,0.006707894,0.9305236,0.000058259924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024344095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020259483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9672439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071257516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005548756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531336477","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Legal Information Basics - with Citation!: Find Judgments Online","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Information retrieval; Internet privacy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science","score_opus":0.07477212810864513,"score_gpt":0.37371936778415443,"score_spread":0.2989472396755093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531336477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033645288,0.00008284312,0.00054826034,0.084739365,0.0027201246,0.00056782935,0.0003445679,0.00022388475,0.9104367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009207889,0.0008423434,0.030842608,0.03516523,0.0054630833,0.00015938378,0.01786419,0.000088906665,0.90036637],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973787,0.00018211144,0.0006307908,0.00020460784,0.0012760005,0.00032779208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628407,0.00030791503,0.00065547624,0.0002959199,0.002246249,0.0002103771],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011138717,0.00023731933,0.00023904191,0.00042277685,0.0005702217,0.0013346099,0.00040905806,0.0003726201,0.001859631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025713926,0.00020406423,0.00005010282,0.0012550071,0.00019931336,0.006914561,0.000039199036,0.00078109105,0.00061937876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014219896,0.000088070876,0.00012647035,0.000030938583,0.0000457865,8.491227e-7,0.008792158,0.000010681751,1.4687487e-7,0.06626724,0.9205668,0.004056659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028605224,0.000056591824,0.0002565455,0.00006990473,0.00005297641,0.0000019665597,0.017539632,0.00001368441,0.0000018065745,0.00075612124,0.9806753,0.00028943428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018150618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014995362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065511115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038716497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010673166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531460821","doi":"","title":"Le Programme de pratique du droit à mi-parcours : une étude empirique (The Law Practice Program at the Halfway Mark: An Empirical Study)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.02901358209643464,"score_gpt":0.38989122978422025,"score_spread":0.36087764768778563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531460821","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109311074,0.0014957794,0.0015332864,0.85699373,0.000826521,0.0015152324,0.0000034958948,0.00008864067,0.028232243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95599735,0.0023875139,0.00045422948,0.006818781,0.0025600358,0.00036766595,0.0000039162733,0.000059213446,0.03135128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880445,0.0059643476,0.0007389589,0.00047404284,0.0009698019,0.0038083417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99519306,0.002002916,0.0009215269,0.00055879395,0.00092371355,0.00039999737],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023635412,0.00033131274,0.0002625472,0.000074616146,0.0048373733,0.0010528403,0.001132901,0.00028490525,0.00037890114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032165172,0.00019855557,0.00019923363,0.0016017673,0.001404864,0.0031269072,0.00011663361,0.004872138,0.00015687518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017827164,0.0045767855,0.003973917,0.000004238256,0.0004682461,0.000016541118,0.037286174,0.000007843516,0.000030962372,0.84277415,0.0076153213,0.10306756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074664655,0.0014464032,0.0014842851,0.000024089311,0.00021220557,0.00095031585,0.122076444,0.000017927372,0.000020471643,0.10832133,0.76442134,0.0002785294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017927695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44541106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85017496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037570633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04174748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532444293","doi":"10.3138/utq.85.3.370","title":"<i>Truth Matters</i>, edited by Lambert Zuidevaart, Allyson Carr, Matthew J. Klaassen, and Ronnie Shuker","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Carr; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009192019271382228,"score_gpt":0.2562717885942373,"score_spread":0.2470797693228551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532444293","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30448276,0.00075243454,0.0029990734,0.44030958,0.0023898561,0.0006596488,0.00025162168,0.0002898274,0.2478652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95349914,0.00023343129,0.0007520339,0.0011789253,0.00019817009,5.55991e-7,0.000016037002,0.000011674372,0.044110037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908453,0.00015140833,0.00012406048,0.00019593426,0.00023904181,0.00020504974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909645,0.00024133109,0.00018442282,0.00016902252,0.00017764486,0.0001311541],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000303018,0.000091107875,0.00012866825,0.000030316192,0.0003255358,0.000053200845,0.00019527478,0.00009186898,0.0032890057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005605486,0.00008690441,0.00004128238,0.0000679699,0.00024100409,0.0014963307,0.000014817878,0.000069098074,0.00006453724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006375222,0.0001374364,0.0022122506,0.000014139325,0.00006725414,0.0000041054077,0.073107734,5.0778624e-8,0.004045457,0.018042613,0.88303554,0.01926966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043381297,0.00009102047,0.0032105276,0.000022097109,0.00003135222,9.826018e-7,0.029497376,0.0000019592583,0.000035313304,0.00020672395,0.96633166,0.00013718737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.117597565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047823403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6490164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021407989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001914824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99762213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532904078","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316585481.010","title":"Moving On","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0503431502450424,"score_gpt":0.2834600645682191,"score_spread":0.2331169143231767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532904078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014313861,0.000013175418,0.000069991125,0.0019437589,0.0006497213,0.00020494031,0.00007741507,0.0001216664,0.996905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018949118,0.00006966834,0.000031181484,0.00046574016,0.00047613512,4.213757e-7,0.000007918799,0.000018843519,0.9970352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908626,0.00006450624,0.000104866,0.000257612,0.00029458615,0.00019217703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891233,0.0002526202,0.00019354532,0.00028216813,0.00022796878,0.00013138937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019968474,0.0001477316,0.00013764639,0.00016339679,0.0006345262,0.00009209465,0.0003406225,0.00026275008,0.00010289371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010277096,0.00015770971,0.00009039796,0.000010485019,0.00027639078,0.00021682943,0.000068079564,0.00044534972,0.0002011801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015697733,0.0000051247116,5.3355495e-7,0.00000464147,0.000025946994,0.000013525166,0.000342626,6.1167135e-8,0.0000046173013,0.884735,0.11194816,0.0029040899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012855539,0.000012940879,0.000004127471,0.00008196628,0.000038083723,5.526533e-7,0.00019858395,3.1818624e-7,0.00001726941,0.00008154578,0.9992345,0.0002015299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007284036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026292288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88728637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035862243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070482754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64312154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535102255","doi":"10.3390/laws5040039","title":"Precedents, Patterns and Puzzles: Feminist Reflections on the First Women Lawyers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.07377895716760687,"score_gpt":0.3904287111053089,"score_spread":0.31664975393770206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535102255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18477342,0.000004516585,0.000032724023,0.35643834,0.0005232131,0.00015443935,0.000015278609,0.00005328094,0.4580048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732586,0.00006658617,0.0000173277,0.00531714,0.00019841762,0.00007244006,6.3063175e-7,0.0000045569736,0.021064278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945104,0.0000765048,0.00008265365,0.00010487694,0.00013538904,0.00014955037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923915,0.00048642413,0.00005103889,0.00012990789,0.000039586164,0.000053918968],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041035924,0.00004386227,0.000038214384,0.000025019071,0.000945477,0.00016835197,0.00011500144,0.000035780602,0.0013391606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045170542,0.000025288724,0.000012140906,0.00018500705,0.00014270513,0.00020227437,0.000014572739,0.00009086809,0.00016543358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010406494,0.00008596812,0.01627321,0.000003589789,0.00001917943,3.7486896e-7,0.07133096,1.2125483e-7,0.000049279937,0.8651995,0.042422634,0.0046047517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006359662,0.000015503063,0.0055987164,0.000013260655,0.0000023903808,4.482669e-7,0.013604645,1.13466214e-7,0.000026389054,0.0019379591,0.9786909,0.000046062087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001465699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011903045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93626827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010462924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103471626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542908246","doi":"10.1080/15580989.2003.11770933","title":"The Government of Canada’s Approach to Ethics: The Evolution of Ethical Government","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Value (mathematics); Patience; Political science; Action (physics); Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Public administration; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06662587231946109,"score_gpt":0.34631464646456095,"score_spread":0.27968877414509985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542908246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046583973,0.000028561833,0.0016353357,0.42813763,0.0004701849,0.00020459776,0.000014300481,0.000004964782,0.56484604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946494,0.000010985341,0.00039632941,0.0022606228,0.000052605217,0.00002992905,4.4484804e-7,0.000002713455,0.0025969879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962313,0.0010721708,0.00026768105,0.000109574474,0.0021115693,0.00020769921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725646,0.0017034458,0.00019225656,0.00025398144,0.00051074766,0.00008309446],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009240868,0.000053645974,0.00007456862,0.000007707602,0.000829488,0.0000776582,0.0003548198,0.00014518276,0.00009376434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032840136,0.000031966858,0.000032133805,0.00046072804,0.00026194425,0.00011809653,0.00003169373,0.0015272086,0.0000012590019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046618047,0.00007470978,0.0007582196,0.00000392011,0.000010975784,1.2193039e-8,0.00943135,0.0000030790043,0.000013799945,0.9631845,0.026016327,0.0004984469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038851413,0.000009264153,0.003718354,0.0000035417017,0.0000054321476,2.8774448e-7,0.097174644,0.000017695456,0.0001229813,0.004676739,0.89419013,0.000042086376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49089694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6506121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.989991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017824352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009689505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99592465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543070789","doi":"","title":"FROM COLLEAGUE TO COP TO COACH: CONTEMPORARY REGULATION OF LAWYER COMPETENCE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Normative; Corporate governance; Political science; Scholarship; Law and economics; Law; Public relations; Sociology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.03837694845004135,"score_gpt":0.349075462012789,"score_spread":0.31069851356274764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543070789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51109457,0.00029617126,0.02942708,0.39607954,0.0013087622,0.00057255593,0.00003658678,0.00005625561,0.06112851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98943335,0.00009000736,0.00048162707,0.0009393899,0.0005007728,0.000006947325,0.0000023699404,0.00000779825,0.00853774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983483,0.00023441075,0.00030328165,0.00013346598,0.0003542933,0.0006262423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998753,0.0003470398,0.00021007677,0.00013047778,0.00041539432,0.00014398016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019774344,0.00006872481,0.00012251058,0.00012688548,0.00032642417,0.00006313476,0.00025383555,0.00005484707,0.00040983545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009752001,0.000053388765,0.000039600414,0.0005563909,0.000070568945,0.00054172677,0.00001907641,0.00042739985,0.00016924783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001365105,0.000095466916,0.0045192153,0.0000010592578,0.00006255628,4.383885e-7,0.011158219,0.000007635595,0.013312355,0.9352912,0.022194631,0.013220735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076535373,0.00030114752,0.010077743,0.000088413224,0.000019195137,0.00000837529,0.030175377,0.0000030239455,0.0013354527,0.20388992,0.753088,0.0002480128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059249047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009857285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73140126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063257595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008140568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99748236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2544355193","doi":"","title":"Why Australian universities are just not good enough","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quadrant","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"League; Work (physics); Higher education; Political science; League table; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Management; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.07420150671135405,"score_gpt":0.3719525630206353,"score_spread":0.2977510563092812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2544355193","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060419347,0.000007652132,0.00021900718,0.49772885,0.0010792835,0.000103297745,0.000009046901,0.0001099444,0.4403236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467159,0.0000073845076,0.00025218682,0.005658621,0.00037997364,0.000002059407,0.000005515814,0.0000047130993,0.046973664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992349,0.00016767024,0.00009986895,0.00010978557,0.00020994901,0.0001778196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941325,0.00016889132,0.000090332054,0.00012510132,0.0001277814,0.00007462867],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041930383,0.000055777266,0.000070896946,0.000058607693,0.00058631325,0.00014449446,0.00015766094,0.000059986593,0.0017757282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018285014,0.000056774596,0.000030988114,0.0003014141,0.00012876272,0.00054087065,0.000010204924,0.0001650025,0.00033530188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006581033,0.00005365786,0.00048000744,0.000006636051,0.00000926366,0.0000013477521,0.030670682,0.0000053991266,0.000050846887,0.87764394,0.09015813,0.0009135146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008775645,0.000011831656,0.002259504,0.00000731019,0.000010399315,4.4858746e-7,0.077395655,0.0000051828356,0.00009310616,0.00037426237,0.9196744,0.00008017328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022623003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007380085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8862965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000892961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004032459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546110508","doi":"","title":"Dark Night of the Soul: A Review of Anthony T. Kronman's the Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Legal profession; Law; Excellence; Ideal (ethics); Meaning (existential); Political science; Elite; Legal education; Soul; Quarter (Canadian coin); Professional responsibility; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03258664799654275,"score_gpt":0.4122315221351373,"score_spread":0.37964487413859455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546110508","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000031943033,0.954093,0.000030104318,0.03356966,0.0010081684,0.0009271046,0.000017832277,0.0000044802655,0.010317719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023256848,0.9904706,0.000009939063,0.0002951273,0.0004616742,0.000016499444,0.0000017763405,0.000021785352,0.006396946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937839,0.0029683243,0.0012926375,0.00017658461,0.00091446156,0.00086408993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939635,0.0009217461,0.003887604,0.0006053572,0.00057960476,0.000042227184],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011574884,0.00021563332,0.00080558535,0.000080855054,0.0008631356,0.000048065493,0.0017027191,0.0001907965,0.0002391912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029394045,0.00008269563,0.0007284227,0.0012437998,0.0005293008,0.00035890169,0.00012962134,0.003552317,0.000013209853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072043345,0.000105679144,0.000037595746,0.0064676446,0.00030555038,1.5240855e-7,0.0015910178,1.3668588e-7,0.000009448186,0.5812401,0.004885579,0.40534988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006976651,0.000023582332,0.000006293042,0.043119077,0.0003876082,0.000033868488,0.0017017169,5.739944e-8,0.000005999731,0.009827837,0.9447258,0.000098404016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067024614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016800358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057304406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032806266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546427331","doi":"","title":"African Canadian Legal Clinic","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.05831755114846584,"score_gpt":0.4152948657748903,"score_spread":0.35697731462642446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546427331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016359574,0.000005199873,0.000013002331,0.30853516,0.0002157452,0.00003734766,7.0294686e-7,0.000027971362,0.68952894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7804168,0.000006079965,0.0009718739,0.008793922,0.00041077012,0.0000036479762,0.0000016962315,0.0000019807833,0.20939323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952054,0.00005195757,0.00009039021,0.000065293614,0.0001037116,0.00016812774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999551,0.00007983257,0.00002389444,0.00007287903,0.000084220475,0.0001881894],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044578785,0.000025806243,0.000028993616,0.00007429025,0.00043120817,0.00015147535,0.00010019778,0.00003421647,0.03226634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044365507,0.000025558233,0.000015347094,0.00037546206,0.00005670307,0.0005853977,0.0000029344858,0.00012374175,0.003408646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.529585e-7,0.000019928044,0.0005061786,1.661493e-7,0.0000028729412,3.4075683e-7,0.008819266,3.740712e-7,0.0000015363867,0.74852246,0.22242345,0.019702757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025677167,0.0000027438095,0.0009053717,3.3448646e-7,0.0000016712197,2.4616963e-7,0.007860256,0.0000042455717,0.0000036444283,0.00021798821,0.9909373,0.000040545634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87326205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98183435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7787808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015342004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028547323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546811838","doi":"","title":"Developments in Canadian Law and Law Libraries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016100528342176457,"score_gpt":0.24260238267579054,"score_spread":0.22650185433361408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546811838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021650894,0.000013606556,0.0000018381974,0.23349032,0.0001915607,0.00009782621,0.000007661182,0.000058644266,0.74448764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93799984,0.00005089268,0.0017533905,0.0043466585,0.000065421926,4.814203e-7,0.000016254202,0.0000070309943,0.05576003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991716,0.00014875658,0.00006481034,0.0001170511,0.00011349032,0.00038425808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993258,0.00010996914,0.000040457013,0.00008744523,0.000021725764,0.00041460225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011613292,0.00007269994,0.00007460593,0.00018344086,0.00070946914,0.00021233856,0.00016367814,0.000094344054,0.0005594162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048001202,0.00008903887,0.00001341805,0.0006586766,0.00025804073,0.008450541,0.000057007957,0.0001994923,0.000065135726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041610356,0.000020299112,0.10363129,0.0000025018933,0.0000051024576,0.0000041250364,0.01153025,1.4176733e-7,1.3289532e-7,0.85114205,0.03360409,0.00005586265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009048881,0.0000034522648,0.029888023,0.0000069493854,0.0000038264566,6.39674e-8,0.008861561,6.5114236e-8,0.00003560962,0.00074462476,0.960253,0.00011230656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9528805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63438797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9266489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013781828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014498342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6126438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548941087","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1057","title":"Women's Voices Being Heard: Responsive Lawyering","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04631599057308432,"score_gpt":0.4110980670236919,"score_spread":0.36478207645060756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548941087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.623993,0.0000277944,0.000009292139,0.16065036,0.00026076,0.00003237243,9.318603e-7,0.000009519238,0.215016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860626,0.00015555887,0.00009989094,0.0073161125,0.0038313505,0.0000012022472,1.902868e-7,0.0000048206566,0.0025283122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991217,0.00018501133,0.00021540599,0.00004838326,0.0002317479,0.00019770635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992146,0.00016765007,0.00022597621,0.00002955789,0.00026206585,0.00010013479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010145807,0.000048463113,0.00011860662,0.00011838035,0.0010047466,0.00023026485,0.00008881383,0.00006198806,0.000097931596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050017,0.000046145004,0.000041399355,0.000296425,0.00018869732,0.000807958,0.000013581533,0.00025867403,0.0000063884136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003368545,0.000026866614,0.00016436163,0.0000028085426,0.000018770972,0.0000057873617,0.15632495,3.3313242e-7,0.00011556817,0.83906466,0.00091805676,0.0033241825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013640837,0.00003224304,0.0013078155,0.0000068297873,0.0000066972366,0.0000134587435,0.02861224,3.0306973e-7,0.000010029805,0.02347734,0.94634145,0.000055154043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066804676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067517196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9454234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015814893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007920964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552043116","doi":"","title":"A Look at Parent Discipline Strategies over Almost a Quarter Century: Some Good News","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AAP News","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; History","score_opus":0.038229599943524394,"score_gpt":0.37083378997619953,"score_spread":0.33260419003267516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552043116","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31032413,0.00022980063,0.0001700453,0.43966356,0.0024877102,0.00049409457,0.000046723286,0.00017512299,0.24640882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730185,0.00029822657,0.000105680316,0.0025063278,0.0010048514,0.00004277723,0.00001674902,0.000012695769,0.022994181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869454,0.00015196783,0.00025411963,0.00024639568,0.00032070428,0.000332245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909467,0.0002399001,0.00015815398,0.00027025133,0.000089975765,0.00014703382],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024169992,0.00011895428,0.000120953046,0.00006217797,0.00049316103,0.00028646906,0.00020586106,0.00008305453,0.0040906775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018810412,0.00008021377,0.00006189071,0.00030356215,0.00015828895,0.0018125504,0.000052365387,0.00014076178,0.0010980754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043790667,0.00030544592,0.022343775,0.0000074592976,0.000041717256,0.000003591256,0.035318665,0.0000010179804,0.0014360358,0.61613244,0.31152728,0.012838792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003138559,0.000031627835,0.0069821705,0.000015721269,0.000013047677,7.67125e-7,0.02363588,0.000001087006,0.000029010807,0.0064646257,0.9623597,0.0001524581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006851561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030211665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6626944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019613284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007379262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555335037","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12246","title":"Discussion Law &amp; Society Review at Fifty: A Debate on the Future of Publishing by the Law &amp; Society Association","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Conversation; Law; Association (psychology); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04928845214196659,"score_gpt":0.35682921533799017,"score_spread":0.3075407631960236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555335037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008055731,0.18756726,0.000020140105,0.7707669,0.000578845,0.0011459796,0.00010585867,0.0000884476,0.039646003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011718075,0.71769494,0.000422135,0.25388116,0.0006919681,0.00019029084,0.000117661366,0.000029796533,0.025800282],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533695,0.0013838534,0.0008508241,0.00046847708,0.0013974452,0.0005624298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948741,0.00197847,0.0013727354,0.0008848614,0.00074785075,0.00014195101],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010504979,0.00030578786,0.0005546647,0.0000010779287,0.0031443369,0.00050781167,0.0009240704,0.0003461292,0.0019981836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012816214,0.00013074937,0.0014062416,0.0011341702,0.00066835916,0.0019841597,0.00018819749,0.000941966,0.00036354357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011681851,0.00006278576,0.000038696624,0.0006733347,0.000102097525,1.5807599e-8,0.0038748155,3.2373904e-8,0.000054407148,0.26531067,0.72645605,0.0034259078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015545511,0.00000876598,0.000015526723,0.004339764,0.00023586325,9.848733e-7,0.00090433494,4.6504869e-7,0.000014455527,0.0022369327,0.9918599,0.00022755915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011267838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004940566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53012764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091875845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004043674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555535336","doi":"","title":"Legally satisfied: a survey of law library workers and job satisfaction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Job satisfaction; Law; Business; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0801765996274241,"score_gpt":0.34865660673362975,"score_spread":0.2684800071062057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555535336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7850736,0.00009033231,0.00011691536,0.035114627,0.00022384543,0.00041253032,0.000052489355,0.00004384422,0.17887183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99011284,0.00012756776,0.0044563743,0.001078059,0.000030912033,3.1035498e-7,0.000029797926,0.0000083501645,0.004155766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979648,0.0009271944,0.00022536662,0.00027978214,0.00038112616,0.00022172245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839604,0.000499698,0.00036858078,0.00027230277,0.00029792506,0.00016548371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023449918,0.00011706363,0.00026053388,0.00016077953,0.00083008077,0.00037587504,0.0006057109,0.00017339263,0.0006945651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054666976,0.00015185685,0.000049985203,0.00088663294,0.00042512704,0.007196447,0.00012557197,0.0005454363,0.000026890724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003001708,0.0001105934,0.65599185,0.000022297238,0.00006504108,0.000007149154,0.013406862,0.000004056226,0.00066409126,0.28077382,0.0127333095,0.035920724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004423691,0.00006446742,0.94780165,0.000057851357,0.00002704477,0.0000015549288,0.004145493,0.0000022404063,0.000086526336,0.0014789354,0.045730587,0.00016126757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17215121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030014575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29180977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053048287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081947853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98768514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556191766","doi":"","title":"Legal Education, TWU, and the Looking Glass","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal education; Legal profession; Legal ethics; Legal practice; Point (geometry); Sociology; Curriculum; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01760411228603856,"score_gpt":0.36059954133209776,"score_spread":0.3429954290460592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556191766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008302623,0.000035771525,0.0003724414,0.41066822,0.00047876703,0.00007646718,2.4456335e-7,0.000023646173,0.5800418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8884351,0.000053905613,0.00023046034,0.004708367,0.00033407653,0.000016096554,2.462203e-7,0.0000020023717,0.10621972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953425,0.0001184012,0.00008143761,0.000069206646,0.00011316231,0.00008351912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920905,0.00048591406,0.000042748274,0.00008404059,0.00014191368,0.000036343667],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072606624,0.000028301116,0.000032014115,0.000025238223,0.0005047458,0.00019766664,0.000086146945,0.000021418662,0.0011510672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011795766,0.000013559095,0.000011303624,0.00018290215,0.0003105863,0.0006551239,0.000011375695,0.000054470558,0.0001011089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002931996,0.000012319874,0.0008153775,3.370499e-7,0.0000025129789,1.5941596e-8,0.0033179834,6.611957e-9,0.000015319129,0.938447,0.027467953,0.029918265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014866173,0.0000014326677,0.0011966957,0.0000036064957,0.00000383897,8.388415e-7,0.0060022436,5.904257e-7,0.000019704212,0.013265007,0.9793257,0.00003168411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007882271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021441432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95185775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028969496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009469124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556624405","doi":"","title":"\"Howdy, Neighbour!\" Introducing the Canadian Association of Law Libraries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011067735134338081,"score_gpt":0.22277719148776026,"score_spread":0.21170945635342217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556624405","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008642486,0.0000031362538,0.000009566199,0.62364894,0.00023352166,0.00016262251,0.000008994667,0.000058360325,0.36723235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8068663,0.00003071018,0.00080478087,0.0025300768,0.0002465237,0.0000010549494,0.000017283484,0.000008554332,0.18949473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988364,0.0003608201,0.00010743183,0.00014970578,0.00026574434,0.00027988182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987764,0.00045079258,0.00020358854,0.00021214345,0.00018313868,0.00017397941],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020756584,0.00007913654,0.00010087865,0.00015930866,0.0014423842,0.0005275757,0.00039762567,0.00012959889,0.004157656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038830546,0.00007576489,0.000049815033,0.0008574917,0.00023597234,0.006034978,0.000059054433,0.00033206755,0.00016302014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002185601,0.000013332031,0.014124952,0.0000024134306,0.000018104436,5.848322e-7,0.008089414,0.0000047217804,0.0000010462234,0.58207685,0.39553276,0.00013363473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007676396,0.000009133042,0.013783892,0.0000062165273,0.000015722462,2.0495454e-8,0.010807567,0.0000019679974,0.0001157566,0.0036630826,0.9714267,0.00009317909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9493831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39427269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7982238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002945212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022708606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558599784","doi":"","title":"Clinical Legal Education in Canada: A Survey of the Scholarship","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Scholarship; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Legal research; Politics; Economic Justice; Law; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.09259511542202659,"score_gpt":0.4317289448270501,"score_spread":0.3391338294050235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2558599784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9531252,0.0004895043,0.000029243924,0.031035306,0.0019311225,0.000098416494,0.0000013676128,0.0000028385118,0.013287036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625915,0.00022486773,0.000025920981,0.0005545156,0.0002183109,0.0000016369644,0.0000014027052,0.0000037905909,0.0027103978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971443,0.001454101,0.0003565846,0.00007282426,0.0003905452,0.0005816827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868435,0.00025715955,0.0002670828,0.00010963118,0.00059269095,0.000089110785],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014920754,0.000042246284,0.00008518058,0.000050306287,0.00017727072,0.000058730704,0.00032948924,0.000044295273,0.000024231858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008213275,0.000033103533,0.000027438908,0.000709442,0.000067291294,0.00049380085,0.000013775583,0.002381333,0.000004692523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000131052775,0.00007359706,0.7294282,3.634844e-7,0.000009227334,7.434094e-8,0.00045790357,0.0000035060225,6.184155e-7,0.25313905,0.001956783,0.014917571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022226952,0.000023683608,0.86394763,0.000009991278,0.0000065147274,0.000012179562,0.016421456,0.0000024490646,0.000002037432,0.040294163,0.07899719,0.000060452905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98802394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4994709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003238265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.50270915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W255874791","doi":"","title":"The Globalization of the Student Lawyer: A Law Student Practice Rule for Indigent Criminal Defense in Sub-Saharan Africa","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Legal service; Political science; Legal research; Criminal law; Practice of law; Economic shortage; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.022870469647897195,"score_gpt":0.38033642120500155,"score_spread":0.35746595155710437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W255874791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52127904,0.01570913,0.00300901,0.35343462,0.0025424752,0.0031936355,0.000013162173,0.000055331206,0.10076357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99360424,0.0046757497,0.000059454447,0.0009128017,0.00021066456,0.000019951207,0.0000013307183,0.0000057749357,0.0005100451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738353,0.0005525885,0.0003940574,0.00011615065,0.0006344945,0.0009191468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844605,0.00043128792,0.00045750814,0.00015177441,0.00046628868,0.00004711374],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060534235,0.00008536492,0.00009746403,0.000048708258,0.0014458323,0.00027822983,0.00049427256,0.000055572546,0.000007569334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010722483,0.000056579385,0.00008272752,0.00057328946,0.00011648402,0.00053929037,0.000019439403,0.00095556566,0.000004347411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007412084,0.00041868284,0.0004112048,0.0000012970196,0.00004330817,2.9855647e-7,0.018716246,0.000039004022,0.00005124209,0.9747782,0.0007100273,0.004756379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007927309,0.00031004785,0.008211804,0.000024657198,0.00014060507,0.00003387238,0.1058943,0.0000074515706,0.000081316466,0.17126232,0.7130944,0.00014648904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009770974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024403542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80351585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012224065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048468728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559051650","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n10p103","title":"Criminological and Legal Investigation of Independence and Despotism of the Judge in Judgment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Independence (probability theory); Dignity; Impartiality; Economic Justice; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06784793807775356,"score_gpt":0.3486434338637803,"score_spread":0.28079549578602675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559051650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9650765,0.000082930885,0.000012833317,0.032334503,0.000082382256,0.000028380657,0.0000018666702,4.808216e-7,0.0023801152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908644,0.00013321724,0.00017221131,0.00045049042,0.000031949043,2.3537926e-7,2.663899e-8,8.5431697e-7,0.00012455233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948883,0.00008990399,0.00019324872,0.000031303232,0.0001377287,0.000058985617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994111,0.00019869814,0.00019304242,0.000029395365,0.00012332144,0.000044435506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005522961,0.000023831024,0.0000657333,0.00003570551,0.00006733073,0.000023568045,0.000044654225,0.000039255858,0.000011706177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038349166,0.000013253325,0.000009429685,0.00006094119,0.00045718224,0.00027696736,0.000016145672,0.000099007346,5.6573136e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029220892,0.000014013019,0.026643502,0.0000054994143,0.0000029532052,4.5787252e-7,0.0024907356,9.76107e-8,0.001099412,0.96914583,0.000046840105,0.0005477511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006370162,0.00016059341,0.7988748,0.00016885833,0.00003267142,0.00004158393,0.005210146,0.0000040171817,0.004412505,0.1598178,0.030563746,0.000076267286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019080539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048133594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.809328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017610158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020723956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28844196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559193241","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v23i4.525","title":"Clinical legal education and disability: accommodation, implementation and assessment in service-learning programs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Experiential learning; Context (archaeology); Experiential education; Relevance (law); Legal education; Accommodation; Service (business); Service-learning; Reasonable accommodation; Pedagogy; Learning disability; Psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Business; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.10256429671831059,"score_gpt":0.5863512038637245,"score_spread":0.48378690714541395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559193241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7581504,0.00008070565,0.0003303476,0.22914635,0.0056280857,0.0003070844,0.0000030973165,0.000017636705,0.0063362787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98698026,0.00088811456,0.006308564,0.0021434831,0.002845697,0.000033754448,0.000035555924,0.000012723804,0.00075183774],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955341,0.0012229001,0.0020530478,0.00030287536,0.0006974452,0.0001895983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944825,0.0015282328,0.0014552589,0.00013561976,0.0021379623,0.00026039375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067650597,0.00013399814,0.00029358905,0.00022401263,0.00018864038,0.000544418,0.0003269448,0.00016682092,0.00028199988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044425027,0.00010994015,0.000099593504,0.00036324264,0.00032125143,0.0035320262,0.000065647546,0.00086327584,0.000009630523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004508692,0.0008851476,0.4239608,0.000004382158,0.000030379146,4.4390228e-7,0.0007487015,4.8087753e-7,0.000007894742,0.064315006,0.00061117427,0.5093905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072660844,0.00011829054,0.51743656,0.00010806637,0.000026807684,0.000016459831,0.009763502,0.000012745614,0.0000023494356,0.003591049,0.46809387,0.000103675025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045782155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048403624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5092868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033676502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077850153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560156547","doi":"","title":"POSITIVISM AND THE INSEPARABILITY OF LAW AND MORALS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Law; Principle of legality; Philosophy of law; Jurisprudence; Legal positivism; Positivism; Political science; Philosophy; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0272791613285259,"score_gpt":0.34140305120460795,"score_spread":0.31412388987608203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560156547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88427234,0.001432801,0.00010632617,0.06231916,0.00007694892,0.00009701876,6.1588935e-7,0.0000065675904,0.051688246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946487,0.003837545,0.000033328073,0.00051752996,0.000083425686,0.000001628192,1.9003264e-7,0.0000020251646,0.0008756062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990622,0.00027625848,0.00012808315,0.000053015276,0.00013409571,0.0003463807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944866,0.00025894647,0.000103713595,0.000050801787,0.00010620694,0.000031703148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028801684,0.000033639022,0.0000716125,0.000021339376,0.0007720623,0.000040562143,0.00006683607,0.000026251562,0.000015845826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003300704,0.000022838096,0.000019111996,0.000122015306,0.00086345134,0.00033646275,0.000009306033,0.00071232126,0.0000011716919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002150331,0.0000180991,0.0016469893,6.180337e-7,0.000015422402,1.2751045e-7,0.008400373,1.9588957e-7,0.000021932034,0.9889828,0.000049294136,0.00084267213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066888693,0.000057487894,0.005925091,0.000003901168,0.000020727053,0.00021154837,0.009350054,0.000005307253,0.00003274477,0.94430053,0.039360702,0.00006302699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005166646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035503285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11037641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082651924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020338788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7810458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560669826","doi":"","title":"Words and Apples: The Ladder Approach in Judicial Decision Making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Common law; Process (computing); Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.021471155324649462,"score_gpt":0.35188372269717016,"score_spread":0.3304125673725207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560669826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6104161,0.0028393657,0.10080193,0.2021576,0.0011196336,0.00051071553,0.000001930563,0.00005237325,0.08210032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99629575,0.0017169069,0.0002704029,0.00039688585,0.0005184143,0.000006507448,1.6145972e-7,0.000005413368,0.0007895534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.0001951343,0.00016693679,0.00009843915,0.00024587676,0.00075903756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999314,0.0004269891,0.00010143112,0.00006998182,0.000056614008,0.000030951498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004089656,0.000052675758,0.000060858805,0.000092726725,0.0005081975,0.00015030068,0.00018148989,0.000051407,0.00009127999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066629774,0.00002944997,0.000021941662,0.0004075147,0.0001241492,0.00046167301,0.00001772949,0.0009959626,0.000013433711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017722594,0.000030802395,0.005108162,3.4452606e-7,0.000010729438,2.255614e-7,0.007853263,0.0000010546527,0.0000156314,0.7877864,0.00038797615,0.19878763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048330822,0.000034579254,0.006080521,0.000038613558,0.000013050488,0.00006335103,0.06778807,0.000011186059,0.0000017073428,0.7813542,0.14400244,0.00012896964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039449282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009448498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38587964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042838752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032469558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57599604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562583985","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n1p234","title":"Ways to Defend Citizenship Rights in Civil Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran and Republic of Tajikistan","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Law; Constitution; Citizenship; Reservation of rights; Political science; Safeguarding; Human rights; Right to property; International human rights law; Private rights; Social rights; Rule of law; Government (linguistics); Politics","score_opus":0.04902071602274823,"score_gpt":0.33470166159549636,"score_spread":0.28568094557274815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562583985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83237356,0.000056831013,0.00002107561,0.026258685,0.00018954581,0.000068390174,0.000020638783,0.0000015767305,0.14100972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987388,0.000023453706,0.00015538569,0.0005584414,0.00008383153,4.5779484e-7,1.6163077e-7,0.0000029228886,0.0004365448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989423,0.00012167543,0.0004825611,0.00006195453,0.00025460686,0.00013686297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985127,0.00039817038,0.00047543086,0.00012220109,0.00041682328,0.00007465968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011353316,0.000049093745,0.00016410866,0.00011259787,0.00013112166,0.00004521588,0.0001402532,0.000051453288,0.00007872828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071514776,0.000029157352,0.00004200097,0.00029657796,0.00046741957,0.00026887306,0.000024017032,0.00012551778,1.9782185e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006595332,0.000038412974,0.0013769602,0.0000127497315,0.000012229373,4.3763094e-7,0.00477236,1.06394765e-7,0.00061755715,0.9923369,0.0007400095,0.00008562458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006216845,0.00014072089,0.018258363,0.00021117376,0.00003337547,0.0000164031,0.0025376845,8.125235e-7,0.0021674382,0.6967284,0.27919137,0.00009259279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007890552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015522536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29560858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041838215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027980766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563619739","doi":"","title":"Back to the Future: Designing and Improving a System of Proactive Management-Based Regulation to Help Lawyers and Protect the Public","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Liability; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02909842288877689,"score_gpt":0.29794196948505375,"score_spread":0.26884354659627685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563619739","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03030444,0.000039628423,0.09576279,0.80558205,0.00035369917,0.0033720545,0.0000037149912,0.000058640115,0.064523004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924634,0.000001864666,0.0038290333,0.00059975724,0.00013645648,0.00015080243,2.3443378e-7,0.000003973108,0.00281449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927163,0.0002178055,0.000108592474,0.00012294787,0.00016593581,0.000113097616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993698,0.0002328698,0.00008235603,0.00012161704,0.00014414062,0.000049241185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012504541,0.000046573023,0.0000454313,0.00006367907,0.00048305237,0.00019814969,0.00010133432,0.000024137154,0.000057563248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002335559,0.000021951702,0.0000092702285,0.0005066609,0.00006398756,0.00038580186,0.000027241307,0.00004489501,0.000013647515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004810444,0.00002507737,0.0006594753,0.00007194588,0.000052038686,1.3716648e-7,0.016601004,0.000005350855,0.0043397257,0.6815577,0.00425976,0.29237968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064263534,0.0001981218,0.015874065,0.0001868108,0.00007240704,0.0000024107244,0.2380072,0.0003451265,0.0048273862,0.0003421891,0.7391763,0.000325352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005745948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013315069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008114948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014876536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37152973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564886668","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n1p177","title":"Pathological Analysis of the Charter of Citizenship Rights in Iran in Judicial Rights Terms with a Focus on Human Dignity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Charter; Political science; Law; Citizenship; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; International human rights law; Right to property; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06187675651863107,"score_gpt":0.36893683618415735,"score_spread":0.3070600796655263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564886668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602452,0.0000028656307,0.000004573869,0.0072192303,0.000045574932,0.000038212012,0.000007678908,7.1225213e-7,0.032435972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996477,0.0000017513813,0.000017894257,0.00019155326,0.00007476445,5.182089e-7,1.6542226e-7,8.757713e-7,0.00006482896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914014,0.00020355926,0.00029762593,0.000048129503,0.00020853401,0.00010198471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926543,0.00023893823,0.0002904262,0.00006439033,0.00009849642,0.00004234504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005810596,0.000040038834,0.00016740958,0.00016637381,0.00012628495,0.000020363534,0.00009086248,0.000045297427,0.00006136755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009805004,0.000017789245,0.00004843919,0.00036666455,0.0003382485,0.00010334268,0.0000065849094,0.00014917714,1.9821856e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015011399,0.00011393542,0.037914254,0.0000013353775,0.000031225445,0.0000050897547,0.0038532184,4.410747e-7,0.00014132359,0.9578493,0.000029393728,0.00004544461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006472241,0.00021349835,0.61901885,0.0000984552,0.00011979274,0.0000033810131,0.00048086428,0.000001180853,0.00060147705,0.37559807,0.003152897,0.00006427995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056650518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026621511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58225125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003744085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006134735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564938851","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v23i5.564","title":"Clinical Legal Education in a Dangerous Time","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Legal education; Situated; Relation (database); Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06872745663137748,"score_gpt":0.5508931711349128,"score_spread":0.4821657145035353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564938851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49101177,0.00024989984,0.0010134386,0.31208405,0.04413804,0.00036828543,0.000012296646,0.000044324555,0.15107791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9370322,0.0006826349,0.0054838387,0.0064321547,0.013268597,0.000016621716,0.0000151497525,0.000022212083,0.037046578],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943966,0.001249935,0.002750232,0.00030166327,0.0010434478,0.0002580917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99172646,0.0026006075,0.0018937768,0.00024288053,0.0031834177,0.00035284163],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076107373,0.00015225397,0.00039643125,0.0005283673,0.0001259067,0.00035621042,0.00090556755,0.00028069748,0.0015728676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023770666,0.00012067808,0.00033064108,0.00046314008,0.00035489266,0.003361977,0.00004794195,0.00091322255,0.00051671616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025517718,0.0029862172,0.056364745,0.0000025159447,0.00007822829,0.000007429592,0.00070114696,0.0000012615849,0.000069270274,0.11765364,0.08389033,0.73799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007900899,0.00011710668,0.07044172,0.00019048998,0.000027124861,0.000038806218,0.0009818852,0.000003795365,0.000013985356,0.004035857,0.92320627,0.00015286062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021348367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000754081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83931595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046225527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027948257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570762802","doi":"10.5430/wje.v6n6p89","title":"Evaluating the Potential of Virtual Simulations to Facilitate Professional Learning in Law: A Literature Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"World Journal of Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Apprehension; Professional development; Legal education; Educational technology; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering; Political science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.16677927549100788,"score_gpt":0.5333604198832608,"score_spread":0.36658114439225287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570762802","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025165558,0.96748424,0.000045758603,0.025942598,0.0026530637,0.0007551748,0.0000124364715,0.0000046199316,0.0030769408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010031883,0.9751008,0.00043029984,0.00074916816,0.0009463689,0.000042758416,0.000026871605,0.000012699501,0.021687858],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99557096,0.0022309958,0.0012570781,0.00014116993,0.00063412735,0.00016564985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949539,0.0015296775,0.0018618336,0.00016718762,0.0013959017,0.00009152299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045992457,0.00014753919,0.0005431383,0.0005753484,0.00038412682,0.00011027538,0.00037342386,0.000091833215,0.0005802861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005792302,0.00008989645,0.00022390578,0.0022430595,0.00010599761,0.00065842725,0.000030190018,0.0011096941,0.000027513453],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008179905,0.00014260896,0.0000039400506,0.0016604522,0.000031141968,5.3602696e-7,0.0070879236,0.000049939677,0.000003172765,0.025557855,0.0070529263,0.9584013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052594143,0.000043049247,0.000010838407,0.08476767,0.0001372221,0.000009822961,0.00084600993,0.0000012044817,6.456266e-8,0.0005411626,0.9135014,0.00008898162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009450436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003024951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95831233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030458262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008636489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99698365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571526283","doi":"","title":"(Introductory Remarks) \"The Delicate Topic of Gender in Legal Education : The Canadian Experience\"","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nagoya Daigaku hosei ronshu/Hōsei ronshū","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Sociology; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.08298221054224078,"score_gpt":0.38732616892081806,"score_spread":0.3043439583785773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571526283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30420613,0.0014559412,0.000044704117,0.31460857,0.0040633194,0.0011114099,0.000015191542,0.0000636037,0.3744311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98550034,0.000042107342,0.00025713717,0.0033761694,0.00076704554,0.00018089893,0.000020123767,0.000015096028,0.009841065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971371,0.0007542718,0.0005123658,0.0003418805,0.0007243081,0.00053003564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775153,0.00032554663,0.0002531044,0.00075765816,0.0005861434,0.0003260273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029075146,0.00017203123,0.00018576952,0.00027912032,0.0011006375,0.00030067487,0.00089011726,0.00018722973,0.00041906227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030029083,0.00012845357,0.00007027265,0.001502027,0.0006802434,0.00084870314,0.0000571442,0.00078870356,0.0001119166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030027422,0.00028949569,0.032663524,0.000012891395,0.00003276971,0.0000026501405,0.21603827,0.000095701515,0.000047146877,0.5051098,0.23268339,0.012994341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016678662,0.000015267999,0.027593497,0.000011111413,0.000018495837,0.000005118094,0.05388122,0.000024545678,0.000052240397,0.0036691008,0.9143966,0.00016601781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64288646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7339953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6817132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009277723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016105734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98947203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571536122","doi":"","title":"Judicial Education: Pedagogy for a Change","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of dispute resolution","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.2448423368850208,"score_gpt":0.515945808805086,"score_spread":0.27110347192006523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571536122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054307647,0.0038880117,0.02332787,0.74164516,0.023416761,0.0011544458,0.000016122982,0.000059017282,0.15218496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772688,0.00017986678,0.006178025,0.0020070185,0.012030614,0.00003617826,0.000008741555,0.000009154258,0.0022815962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913883,0.000121357625,0.0002565817,0.00005458536,0.0002988847,0.00012978795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980129,0.000099323224,0.00038405304,0.000059335027,0.0012905435,0.00015383287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014232453,0.000042259842,0.00008614822,0.00014283937,0.00022968081,0.000086025546,0.000120316356,0.000059714825,0.000042040498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018048849,0.000040302137,0.00005929072,0.0003177844,0.000054902393,0.0010707685,0.0000071304753,0.00014400417,0.000014394163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015899463,0.00048774946,0.0012162741,0.000012396692,0.000029797491,8.210829e-7,0.040385235,0.000008359054,0.00003651859,0.46078876,0.39817584,0.098699264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025245786,0.000097724245,0.0016371153,0.000017153836,0.000025378595,0.000009012518,0.009637245,0.000025321406,0.0000055021305,0.0068938285,0.9813504,0.00004881843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094529014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005542639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9229612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023787889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045640646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8096455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572041551","doi":"","title":"\"The Delicate Topic of Gender in Legal Education : The Canadian Experience\"","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nagoya Daigaku hosei ronshu/Hōsei ronshū","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal education; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.11709307503651525,"score_gpt":0.41642587056474634,"score_spread":0.2993327955282311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572041551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27282402,0.0014182174,0.000041008785,0.24035296,0.0033196532,0.0009348517,0.000012813524,0.000058975183,0.48103753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98626024,0.000060895378,0.00018793945,0.0020239023,0.00035363974,0.0001980741,0.000013215567,0.000012161228,0.010889937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975749,0.0005280707,0.00046878745,0.0002579585,0.00064221304,0.00052803976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997938,0.00040388724,0.0002218868,0.0005642299,0.00052827224,0.00034373405],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023589255,0.00014457137,0.00014599621,0.00020933812,0.0015601245,0.00041433657,0.00079852564,0.00016968402,0.00016053194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024821535,0.00010681241,0.00005896929,0.0013563108,0.0005978702,0.00075023464,0.000047962174,0.0006178713,0.000107733504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020426902,0.00017529483,0.02951084,0.0000058050496,0.000020619787,0.0000018050458,0.12305006,0.000042540833,0.000013191179,0.73660195,0.08817511,0.022382362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015342578,0.0000145745225,0.019398635,0.000008392107,0.000011053976,0.000003057488,0.053883992,0.000027031032,0.000037028123,0.005997951,0.92032796,0.00013687929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67605656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8372147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83215284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007893903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015912531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573199049","doi":"10.1177/2322005816669606","title":"Teaching Law for the Real World:","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Legal education; General partnership; Law; Legal profession; Commercial law; Political science; Legal research; Comparative law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0527156518936335,"score_gpt":0.4620410660962867,"score_spread":0.4093254142026532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573199049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029488585,0.00003731358,0.00031169745,0.45036992,0.0040906873,0.0001394227,9.51981e-7,0.0000056335334,0.5420955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96875256,0.000013791977,0.002300958,0.0013722515,0.003653767,0.0000107482965,0.0000012121584,0.0000066241328,0.023888089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992078,0.0001275272,0.00025638173,0.00006102456,0.00022041763,0.00012686284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998192,0.00025459187,0.00076137634,0.0002197831,0.00049124,0.000080973994],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021360684,0.000050748975,0.00007544151,0.00008560013,0.003330906,0.0010108576,0.00049643277,0.000030470559,0.00009806905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019272452,0.000037954927,0.000074022086,0.00008253229,0.00018130742,0.0022648084,0.000009730377,0.0004030731,0.000009213749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012617355,0.000078592006,0.00049815513,0.0000025598597,0.000016769423,1.7322594e-7,0.014842549,6.37672e-7,0.000018597793,0.8717508,0.024466718,0.08831184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009851201,0.000020740426,0.006545484,0.000020852274,0.000033535533,0.000004210389,0.020193283,0.0000021493763,0.000017530374,0.008483618,0.96453285,0.000047217734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015564035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009703424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9658037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112052636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027890475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99796665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574851620","doi":"","title":"Defending Rights in RussiaPamela A. JORDAN. , Vancouver : UBC Press, 2005, 304 p.","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers du monde russe","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; State (computer science); Political science; Art; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.017904014837313673,"score_gpt":0.29799217141126977,"score_spread":0.2800881565739561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574851620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09046236,0.016970819,0.00023070353,0.17243093,0.015337479,0.0008329863,0.00003764081,0.0001805553,0.70351654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8253932,0.001895591,0.0015886622,0.003439345,0.0014353602,0.000031273732,0.00001562339,0.000021564449,0.16617939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698347,0.0005077831,0.00061046326,0.0004934291,0.0005150214,0.000889811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983575,0.00040501697,0.00034155007,0.00038347245,0.00013577103,0.00037672065],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011610668,0.00030699457,0.0003195509,0.00020050486,0.0010160233,0.00034378297,0.00044294194,0.00051876134,0.0023622944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067537866,0.00032524727,0.00013508141,0.0015484742,0.0007002597,0.0024761576,0.00002386892,0.0014221186,0.00043142252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021932248,0.00037097966,0.00017536634,0.00001059151,0.00002245674,0.000043958615,0.020734398,0.00007835908,0.000025162924,0.6010555,0.37367734,0.0037839743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005006365,0.00003755271,0.0011625872,0.00007315365,0.00005615758,0.00000561136,0.0029560076,0.0001534403,0.000116259915,0.05306621,0.9414779,0.00039448997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073615983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01158355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7349309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001002062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008234711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576862296","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12267","title":"A Survey of Beliefs and Priorities About Access to Justice of Family Law: The Search for A Multidisciplinary Perspective*","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Mental health; Family law; Law; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Political science; Popularity; Psychology; Public relations; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.28785571453105835,"score_gpt":0.5381772428008942,"score_spread":0.25032152826983584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576862296","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1190587,0.24898118,0.00084753137,0.42846274,0.0021565203,0.008069271,0.00074706384,0.00005421182,0.1916228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92708766,0.06718023,0.00063810375,0.003703537,0.00018442216,0.00014305873,0.000006162937,0.00001259949,0.0010442316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987153,0.0003632339,0.00029097707,0.00016768023,0.00030148585,0.00016133334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961742,0.0013506622,0.0002803172,0.00039645468,0.0017336648,0.00006469021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041707703,0.000079905156,0.00026154696,0.000036485235,0.0012080695,0.00021935227,0.0006478819,0.000043291675,0.000016358083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046108067,0.000059663656,0.000049845272,0.00024663578,0.0004926822,0.00059034384,0.00015821413,0.00015739136,0.0000046232744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011659423,0.00036554146,0.020850373,0.0067921826,0.00017334206,0.0000010329247,0.09005101,0.000004468943,0.0003159989,0.7455723,0.103102066,0.03265504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015332583,0.000058474794,0.7728348,0.0013072315,0.00011304769,2.994631e-7,0.011863773,0.000008976779,0.000010586854,0.0004094736,0.21312651,0.00011351914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07816269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008991742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80802894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045489433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008857336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9291616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580118704","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1305","title":"Book Notes: How Lawyers Lose Their Way:A Profession Fails Its Creative Minds, by Jean Stefancic and Richard Delgado","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.025642432128446586,"score_gpt":0.31954857770121825,"score_spread":0.29390614557277167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580118704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017603163,0.009454813,0.0011123327,0.31205457,0.0012445359,0.00066796504,0.00006290699,0.00010811907,0.6576916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765297,0.00058627926,0.00040882864,0.0026482125,0.0006917867,0.000014760097,0.00001920047,0.000019863528,0.019081324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981405,0.0004848622,0.00028874082,0.00022700326,0.0004540926,0.00040476173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833304,0.00046554822,0.00040469933,0.0001281029,0.0004429085,0.00022568752],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010184871,0.00017692344,0.00018780293,0.00008177027,0.0021820213,0.0009960555,0.00022283485,0.00016034146,0.0009430279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044667424,0.00014437713,0.00006471429,0.00031325076,0.00024122822,0.0026603849,0.000030619954,0.0007895786,0.000047439116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007302694,0.00046170244,0.0009274729,0.000024880721,0.00007889013,0.000019455392,0.020709015,0.000008146289,0.0022593213,0.5650136,0.3967694,0.013655111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061915163,0.00007496657,0.00043075456,0.0001047037,0.00004165877,0.000026461057,0.021012433,0.000036606998,0.0016969515,0.00959099,0.96606016,0.0003051736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019663766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0356765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95892656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015470701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003522357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581970992","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3030","title":"Book Review: Unlocking Memories: Cognitive Interviewing for Lawyers by Geoff Coughlin","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive interview; Interview; Criminology; Cognition; Sociology; Psychology; Anthropology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.0485227006500057,"score_gpt":0.39683206006334265,"score_spread":0.34830935941333696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581970992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025412728,0.08180743,0.017358154,0.36553726,0.0020229279,0.00062435697,0.0000735161,0.00007283424,0.5324781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5161425,0.1302545,0.0023137638,0.27409503,0.0041093803,0.00021964977,0.000048140293,0.00009610046,0.07272094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838674,0.0003001793,0.00042496188,0.00017461622,0.00035137997,0.0003621214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975708,0.0009712642,0.00040404164,0.00010056529,0.00077664584,0.00017669085],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022730867,0.000117635085,0.00019094917,0.000040889136,0.001551275,0.0002826351,0.00025144606,0.000074665,0.0036318477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023103124,0.00008765677,0.000119524775,0.00020287244,0.00021136361,0.0016935841,0.000023012295,0.0003425152,0.000092494774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017700188,0.000056829023,0.000023773131,0.000047890495,0.00005633332,0.0000020048294,0.0024264327,1.037881e-7,0.00009068507,0.13634896,0.84163517,0.019294115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041617197,0.000036031048,0.000002967191,0.001463623,0.000065945605,0.000015281164,0.0025709358,0.0000012149087,0.00025192738,0.004966585,0.99006164,0.00014768663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031492612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069635254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5161171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018438231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004657821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585534320","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001450","title":"'In the Public Interest': The Responsibilities and Rights of Government Lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Professional responsibility; Legal ethics; Law; Private rights; Economic Justice; Professional ethics; Democracy; Public interest; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05216139345106101,"score_gpt":0.38516743859201297,"score_spread":0.33300604514095195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585534320","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43202227,0.00008791402,0.0000051568304,0.4685109,0.00023493805,0.00006748999,0.0000016295527,0.0000026344237,0.099067055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949761,0.000031457403,0.00004016892,0.0040443307,0.00017603458,0.0000011053608,1.305455e-7,9.0584007e-7,0.000729743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895686,0.00044378103,0.00015957197,0.000042501102,0.00028877414,0.00010848933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993467,0.00036452108,0.00011091271,0.00009088473,0.00005598705,0.00003102479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022335828,0.000032806383,0.000043197553,0.000019526786,0.00075708097,0.00027744778,0.00019510894,0.000021262409,0.000218785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023476142,0.000017327351,0.000020489177,0.00016254418,0.00024525786,0.0006094863,0.000007156806,0.0003180557,0.000003831975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009882636,0.00003256322,0.000060918417,4.0428634e-7,0.0000030775452,0.0000018095463,0.031447224,6.2087906e-8,0.000017852159,0.95693564,0.010857929,0.0006326579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007475884,0.000024882955,0.003627108,0.0000052032537,0.0000037244909,0.000028788254,0.021570351,9.814576e-7,0.000020547792,0.07968865,0.89492935,0.000025673204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007282831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011055325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8840714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051755032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010396575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6169131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587036166","doi":"","title":"Foreign Trained Black Lawyers’ Experiences in Ontario: I am a Lawyer! Am I a Lawyer? An Odyssey!","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; University of Toronto; Iowa State University; National University of Science and Technology; U.S. Department of Commerce","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.05510115537479684,"score_gpt":0.35009009748971365,"score_spread":0.29498894211491683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587036166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48541778,0.000057208126,0.000007218676,0.001304105,0.0004148996,0.00031484384,0.000007142002,0.000047876256,0.51242894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8911637,0.00007108453,0.0008397818,0.00007635905,0.000093355266,0.000004591893,0.00030597864,0.000017311926,0.107427835],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997924,0.00030774166,0.000226723,0.0004571495,0.000689784,0.00039463915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819314,0.0001102994,0.0005076051,0.000346136,0.0005754105,0.00026742704],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083535875,0.0002451604,0.0004183421,0.000150308,0.00051261083,0.00012060201,0.0007164631,0.0004556592,0.03223488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020406402,0.00032237382,0.00012493052,0.00034503845,0.0003608705,0.002922558,0.000030379146,0.0005069752,0.000048359198],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020737658,0.00026286065,0.0006002421,0.000023640372,0.000038111117,0.000010194384,0.9675231,0.000005052093,0.00004489742,0.024123447,0.0040987995,0.0030623004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050664425,0.00013451168,0.035466492,0.000057452617,0.000054045006,4.3634813e-7,0.8783619,0.000022983737,0.0000061290875,0.0004463502,0.08461566,0.00032743902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9815339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99907243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40574592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001665387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00446053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587226071","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1381","title":"Power Point in Legal Education: Pedagogical Paradox-An Exploratory Study","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Point (geometry); Exploratory research; Power point; Legal education; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Mathematics education; Mathematics; Social science; Physics","score_opus":0.10601633648221641,"score_gpt":0.43717876468040096,"score_spread":0.33116242819818453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587226071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20288832,0.00011325302,0.00016133804,0.05052959,0.0019163344,0.00029888077,0.0000013007783,0.000049473027,0.7440415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99512595,0.000022548995,0.0007569941,0.0022914805,0.00080842344,0.000043521977,0.000002637797,0.000013220836,0.0009352397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978858,0.00057678524,0.00043744323,0.0002141362,0.00056776835,0.00031804887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886763,0.000072830095,0.00019587275,0.00020888273,0.00034127058,0.00031353967],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020419287,0.00012277927,0.00014819816,0.00014113,0.0011681967,0.00077037234,0.00033956207,0.00008961555,0.002215392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003362073,0.000115875555,0.00005488834,0.0005006128,0.00014191907,0.0032062223,0.00002358957,0.0010424963,0.00017226067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018948209,0.002554119,0.0013164249,8.0060494e-7,0.000009618196,0.000029179862,0.07543888,0.00003663549,0.000009500924,0.91932607,0.0007024891,0.00055736577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011487249,0.00035498693,0.0051764855,0.00003223814,0.000019990248,0.00012239648,0.49739867,9.5211476e-7,0.000016164047,0.13651371,0.35888824,0.0003274357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048281506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35284305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79223764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003879375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036942835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587242656","doi":"","title":"A Legal Analysis of the Access to Court Record Policies of the Provincial and Territorial Courts of the Common Law Jurisdiction of Canada and Public Accessibility","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Public access; Original jurisdiction; Common law; Public administration","score_opus":0.01908961824210296,"score_gpt":0.3238294537769467,"score_spread":0.30473983553484374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587242656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.956543,0.000024774326,0.000003220803,0.013411508,0.0012747871,0.00034827975,0.00018358557,0.0000028604384,0.028207932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979528,0.000027030592,0.000013512665,0.0000316608,0.00008271032,6.053435e-7,0.0000069736916,0.0000031616828,0.0018815165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871594,0.00030653365,0.0002097082,0.00013884668,0.0005228345,0.000106162566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767274,0.0001809091,0.0011345935,0.00031042655,0.0006543072,0.00004703198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044240075,0.00008547537,0.00030010898,0.00005661425,0.0004912673,0.00003259845,0.00064819545,0.00012347048,0.0003151005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002700754,0.000058854293,0.00010647218,0.00043220277,0.000442259,0.0007454082,0.00012995335,0.00012808361,1.3119518e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009723002,0.0005322397,0.56741744,0.00052192033,0.0016747558,1.8099877e-7,0.31152984,0.000008508995,0.002666427,0.08250331,0.011654167,0.020518903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014416322,0.000021054222,0.9529424,0.000055816843,0.000449137,4.703676e-8,0.03678335,0.0000055061546,0.00024451347,0.00009061812,0.009198744,0.00006467513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99968094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38552493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029984443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029041043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51517564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587939824","doi":"","title":"Library & Learning Commons: Law & Legislation: Citing Legal Sources","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Commons; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08239854981434418,"score_gpt":0.3335069427738028,"score_spread":0.2511083929594586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587939824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018216908,0.000038360915,0.00020245694,0.021020638,0.0002672126,0.00006990008,4.5032093e-7,0.0003008675,0.9598832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265096,0.0000098985165,0.0024891824,0.0024133394,0.00036569205,0.000007660699,0.000007205759,0.000008269889,0.06818913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917436,0.00021123305,0.00016322843,0.00010973149,0.00016931802,0.00017211991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945706,0.00022464612,0.00010068198,0.000085436106,0.000062483145,0.000069662274],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004138302,0.000055401575,0.00005859577,0.00005349499,0.0012100255,0.0003995179,0.00015520566,0.000053690488,0.012321269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018396239,0.000054828335,0.000029092313,0.0004199704,0.00017598637,0.0033428955,0.000027739863,0.00031269676,0.00027177425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025942318,0.000026938762,0.009060906,8.8223214e-7,0.0000053154613,8.249752e-7,0.038162176,0.000001309124,0.000005194963,0.9446685,0.005147122,0.0029182916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004575849,0.000010080551,0.0013233629,0.000004655869,0.0000045870715,9.542337e-7,0.031013494,0.000013494038,0.00010672678,0.0040844395,0.96330947,0.00008298919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024938688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003477624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013188092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028853974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589511104","doi":"10.7202/1038487ar","title":"An Inside Job: Engaging with Indigenous Legal Traditions through Stories","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Law; Narrative; Legal education; Political science; Sociology; Traditional knowledge","score_opus":0.06392293215609136,"score_gpt":0.36531756448323294,"score_spread":0.3013946323271416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589511104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14363948,0.000045208366,0.0021188145,0.07491281,0.0015636878,0.00018149565,0.000059711456,0.00014724812,0.77733153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944599,0.00007103518,0.0027189893,0.001261643,0.0008189054,0.000007775615,0.0000018693152,0.000013114136,0.0006467174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869436,0.00031938133,0.00020266746,0.00012361762,0.00037078964,0.000289198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989987,0.0002142779,0.00016513254,0.00013251294,0.00032352016,0.00016587184],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007177623,0.000086488966,0.00009244288,0.000059369333,0.010913796,0.000381308,0.0002000114,0.000052774005,0.00065598387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000156176,0.000057574594,0.000032195698,0.00032483874,0.00028960823,0.0047731022,0.000004434313,0.0004947185,0.000040304294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130666795,0.000099115234,0.0005522942,9.88887e-7,0.000025504014,0.000018136883,0.027313553,0.0000038035867,0.00011432811,0.96657795,0.00065621664,0.004625031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023772393,0.0000844908,0.0008791558,0.000022217835,0.000016878646,0.00012763905,0.013949426,1.8249574e-7,0.00019853472,0.005092041,0.97926795,0.00012375567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014210793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089694574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9786117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024236328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031845673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589630749","doi":"","title":"UofL Libraries: Foreign Law: Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03449367265831965,"score_gpt":0.3183735161631886,"score_spread":0.28387984350486895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589630749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009146629,0.0000063371476,0.00027329684,0.18266635,0.0002849955,0.000040332678,0.0000027525336,0.000036182963,0.8157751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87682796,0.000006316535,0.00042485973,0.009221721,0.00018134362,0.000005715768,8.9956364e-7,0.0000025498978,0.11332863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995372,0.000041939336,0.00007523984,0.00006399727,0.00015914338,0.00012246818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994208,0.0003219135,0.000028879916,0.00008148455,0.00007899397,0.00006792806],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015737442,0.000027864558,0.000029668468,0.000012640131,0.00034207592,0.00009747956,0.00010691761,0.000023184659,0.009621417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044336493,0.000017875567,0.000008499027,0.00017342746,0.00009247789,0.0008895119,0.000008361311,0.000039733583,0.00010417928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.0410156e-7,0.0000041834032,0.00035570175,2.2856639e-7,0.0000017665998,2.0422995e-7,0.0005350361,1.2954424e-8,0.00000843271,0.76386595,0.2337176,0.0015102429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040166917,0.0000021707042,0.00017188392,0.0000017176924,0.000001085743,1.2158601e-7,0.003654134,1.6471824e-7,0.00014058895,0.028911797,0.96703583,0.000040339088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9611791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98008853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8759133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008407099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034664036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589870051","doi":"","title":"An Exploration of Virtual Visitation as an Option in Divorce Proceedings","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Internet privacy; Business; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.08162013078902654,"score_gpt":0.35613938839230247,"score_spread":0.27451925760327595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589870051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86083764,0.0000054571397,0.0010852091,0.001516842,0.00007609907,0.00012434152,0.000001074429,0.000024540137,0.13632879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965906,0.000043092354,0.0025195298,0.00002070538,0.000025692216,3.620598e-7,0.000008299903,0.0000028058957,0.0007888821],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994893,0.000071726754,0.000073770956,0.00010948003,0.00017661774,0.000079125624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993804,0.000019001018,0.0001760065,0.000070028174,0.00030023875,0.00005432142],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004050144,0.00004049562,0.00006923405,0.00006183271,0.00016391132,0.00001593631,0.00014622866,0.00006442391,0.003606184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008635397,0.00005593888,0.000016321737,0.00017369576,0.000099654055,0.010990477,0.000009835939,0.000059720856,0.000009911506],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007823194,0.00021261559,0.0015329958,0.00000450242,0.0000039802844,2.2695362e-7,0.6335869,0.000004771931,0.0014461383,0.3507791,0.00003343789,0.012317145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023194177,0.00031488758,0.2029586,0.00001201017,0.000013028288,1.1121517e-7,0.7936903,0.00020791827,0.00018391864,0.0012909222,0.0010131152,0.000083213185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46405378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20625752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34948814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014182444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017968973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590531985","doi":"","title":"Juries in the 21st Century, by Jacqueline Horan","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.014170204178206138,"score_gpt":0.3002366324507993,"score_spread":0.28606642827259315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590531985","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058645073,0.0015041027,0.000014145076,0.6783869,0.0005501105,0.00006162761,0.0000047104577,0.0000073403253,0.260826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99535906,0.00015718027,0.00006918467,0.004182041,0.00012382207,9.984168e-7,6.190001e-7,0.0000018162685,0.00010527843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995669,0.000079688325,0.00012741746,0.000036876634,0.00006370466,0.0001254124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995694,0.0000803443,0.00007665289,0.000057914018,0.00012395854,0.000091705864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007065194,0.000029743433,0.000060053662,0.00015975827,0.00029193965,0.00008158825,0.00017755572,0.00008655697,0.00010755595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056566356,0.000022358412,0.000008802099,0.00034863586,0.00043040662,0.00016030531,0.0000023892896,0.00031181698,0.0000035422643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.16059e-7,0.0000052384053,0.00097412756,6.171668e-7,0.0000021404633,0.000002246192,0.0023388625,3.7630688e-8,0.000009637772,0.9811523,0.008498968,0.007015329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070583104,0.000025537662,0.00013252733,0.000004288675,0.0000032213184,0.00001898101,0.009657925,2.3497472e-7,0.00001290964,0.012903896,0.97714335,0.000026533477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039246075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4231677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026392127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000760044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96715164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590793414","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v11i2.3794","title":"Approaches to Copyright Education for Faculty in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Political science; Copyright law; Public relations; Library science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Intellectual property; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.3527427208566833,"score_gpt":0.4521605180051952,"score_spread":0.0994177971485119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590793414","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02082491,0.00012458733,0.0000071113213,0.77374554,0.00023294424,0.0002963578,0.000008138925,0.0000010330149,0.2047594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99264205,0.00012636323,0.0003868221,0.005298789,0.00019178132,0.00001858595,0.000007996649,0.0000023105868,0.0013252896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902475,0.00027695156,0.00021964783,0.000041898802,0.00024421068,0.00019252392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982169,0.00082860485,0.00023480874,0.0001022066,0.00025284788,0.0003646251],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030257725,0.000037938713,0.00005908062,0.00024658436,0.0024119525,0.0019322529,0.0002780394,0.00003781339,0.000050553666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00556688,0.000027630473,0.000009617309,0.00023445852,0.00017451834,0.023366041,0.000016579872,0.00039308824,0.000002885474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068295936,0.000009791223,0.0065356786,0.000019181689,0.000010451985,8.988301e-7,0.032485686,0.000007073925,2.0490859e-7,0.8526799,0.084326416,0.023856398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096135285,0.000021090531,0.011076468,0.000018559436,0.000003807813,0.0000074326535,0.060747463,0.000021631115,0.000010069538,0.0020902858,0.92586976,0.00003730148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78538954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90013325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97181714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010868001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033413596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591491183","doi":"10.7202/1038711ar","title":"La contribution des blogues juridiques à la connaissance, à la critique et aux transformations du droit","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04938963240995386,"score_gpt":0.40459479334492676,"score_spread":0.3552051609349729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591491183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046379897,0.0006135035,0.0015987136,0.2261858,0.0013632674,0.00013689045,0.00020049667,0.00004948302,0.76521385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870384,0.0073408615,0.0006924934,0.0015501322,0.0006713197,0.000020860874,0.000019553838,0.000018723507,0.0026477082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966023,0.0019507227,0.00052818086,0.00016334179,0.0003560391,0.00039939274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648947,0.0011644257,0.000538073,0.00021101037,0.0013345277,0.00026250162],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004870387,0.00018487709,0.00023347662,0.000084139974,0.016207557,0.00216416,0.00044618538,0.0003470445,0.0011753007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029517119,0.00019375485,0.00016217884,0.00019536237,0.0025080938,0.0065443385,0.000029298351,0.0015453543,0.000106840394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016730044,0.00026690183,0.00021724246,0.00002279757,0.0000637601,0.000031966058,0.005194097,0.0000051750153,0.000023420273,0.9749582,0.009066508,0.010133229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047923,0.000043827327,0.0023895737,0.00021930596,0.00008112849,0.0004984831,0.0016827929,0.000024518245,0.00023446514,0.12460197,0.8695421,0.00020260563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010501913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040975157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98240036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024963077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005857003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591920703","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Manitoba Statutes: Library","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Library science; Law; Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.0874145111210326,"score_gpt":0.35375844570387427,"score_spread":0.26634393458284167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591920703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019715077,0.00059538416,0.000039454717,0.047882445,0.005986705,0.0003310018,0.000089377565,0.000639209,0.9444167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00032046917,0.0046085687,0.0061459565,0.016675467,0.004964078,0.00006334804,0.0005785541,0.00007826619,0.9665653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979993,0.00028747524,0.00046871943,0.0003509248,0.00047140822,0.0004221757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982898,0.0005260658,0.00033715542,0.00041609895,0.00022594699,0.00020491196],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050306314,0.00022834072,0.00024055896,0.00031782387,0.0006696021,0.00087351765,0.0007864883,0.00050474174,0.072857946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095711905,0.00021675041,0.000113261834,0.0008101214,0.00028247613,0.0029693912,0.00009448068,0.000935215,0.0030566482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025603538,0.000051064842,0.00010408106,0.000017566685,0.000026550226,0.0000027642386,0.005400149,1.9945263e-8,1.2921409e-7,0.27266935,0.7182291,0.0034966285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050245624,0.00001497594,0.00007441461,0.000045961424,0.000031751075,8.128431e-7,0.014624021,2.2148137e-7,0.000009675715,0.013160651,0.971697,0.0002902893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04141404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0094167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2595087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008804013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059391996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592327897","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2913006","title":"A Flex Time JD: New Approaches to the Accessibility of Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"FLEX; Legal education; Computer science; Psychology; Business; Political science; Law; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.1120325877420232,"score_gpt":0.3969968224137107,"score_spread":0.2849642346716875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592327897","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1619472,0.00040996046,0.0017606237,0.6431579,0.0010597978,0.00038090482,0.0000016000465,0.000021003765,0.19126101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482081,0.000103498394,0.00023350366,0.00038446975,0.0011696746,0.000006259802,0.0000013040691,0.000005491401,0.049887713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854237,0.0001849427,0.00021474621,0.00012001335,0.00029134244,0.0006465627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989494,0.00007636258,0.00038967852,0.0003432923,0.00013960255,0.00010166431],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040207873,0.000063519656,0.00008625105,0.00006054575,0.0017235567,0.00062685146,0.0008286998,0.000047206395,0.0002437254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017154153,0.00004678989,0.000055992423,0.0002062481,0.00011289733,0.0012615927,0.000036912348,0.0010746197,0.00009206405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018866776,0.00010455735,0.00093264057,0.0000011934292,0.000027342798,2.9646191e-8,0.0049197534,0.0000031261789,0.00003476269,0.8814942,0.006118321,0.1063452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016956619,0.00007070577,0.01264986,0.000012794922,0.000036404574,0.00001706018,0.015360051,0.0000134353795,0.000079537196,0.31332546,0.65813655,0.00012858688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010849073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016502231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7862609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048327295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035423517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592669511","doi":"","title":"Socrates and Cicero: Functionality as Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Cicero; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Epistemology; Socratic method; Law; Literature; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.024681444636005034,"score_gpt":0.36333249296888714,"score_spread":0.3386510483328821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592669511","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2772476,0.0014572876,0.0058422126,0.5418056,0.00167123,0.00014490487,0.0000033072308,0.00007959841,0.1717482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95915234,0.0038082392,0.000043368444,0.000930058,0.00082611025,0.0000031170923,5.4078623e-7,0.000005105066,0.03523111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857706,0.00017691273,0.00013759024,0.000101259335,0.00023002036,0.00077714224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918354,0.0003257404,0.00011492436,0.000058561014,0.0002307851,0.00008644183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026267977,0.00005461824,0.00005450525,0.00005218844,0.00097656087,0.0001447623,0.00010049158,0.000049789753,0.0008085585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014041662,0.000038630555,0.00002521919,0.0002047207,0.00013282355,0.000654409,0.000010160868,0.0007360825,0.00017612914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013102166,0.000019896599,0.0015084811,9.602359e-7,0.00002651394,2.1071945e-7,0.000763547,9.146241e-8,0.0001397911,0.972787,0.002133498,0.022606872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019748932,0.00004477257,0.0014768527,0.000005409124,0.00003403778,0.000052110303,0.011791305,3.4435257e-7,0.000013288785,0.6696586,0.3166534,0.0000723786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083638745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002810718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68190473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050610345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072535207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595448966","doi":"10.21125/inted.2017.1197","title":"“IT’S ALL ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP”: EXPLORING A SUCCESSFUL PUBLIC-PRIVATE TEACHING AND LEARNING PARTNERSHIP AT A CANADIAN UNIVERSITY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INTED proceedings","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Public–private partnership; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.20785686273667503,"score_gpt":0.37556174499001127,"score_spread":0.16770488225333624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595448966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51382333,0.0000070573506,0.000004337208,0.22784014,0.0001189759,0.00009421749,7.0697183e-7,0.00004591074,0.25806534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838917,0.000030079835,0.00013887552,0.001103421,0.00015558863,0.000009318118,0.0000030002777,0.000008342761,0.01465963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905324,0.00012475906,0.000118659715,0.00018987422,0.00019362196,0.00031982665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987332,0.00047973296,0.00022305956,0.000112817084,0.00024885338,0.00020232116],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002475764,0.00008146859,0.00006944039,0.00015282644,0.011753448,0.0015854371,0.00047194338,0.00008053583,0.00015433575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017302748,0.00007591499,0.000024397183,0.00019937284,0.00030291372,0.0032724016,0.00010142736,0.0011566434,0.000047260233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000774785,0.00000730543,0.26668838,0.0000060816465,0.000017616743,0.0000017035874,0.17118211,3.5631166e-7,0.000017515134,0.55250007,0.007893625,0.0016774728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082749786,0.0000064207015,0.046382934,0.00002974441,0.000012905947,0.0000027897706,0.06965937,0.000035255125,0.0000039766883,0.0006632384,0.8830247,0.000095941185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22900905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2991483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8751311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039661414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050453044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595682237","doi":"","title":"Institutional Dimensions of Communications and Information Technology in Canadian law schools","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information technology; Communications law; Information and Communications Technology; Public relations; Telecommunications; Political science; Law; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02251020853189849,"score_gpt":0.3212597671276201,"score_spread":0.2987495585957216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595682237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10310269,0.00048782706,0.00004073387,0.3834453,0.00025853113,0.00049310934,0.00006497768,0.00008711172,0.51201975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99093646,0.00021212042,0.004857249,0.0036946451,0.000043601125,0.00003607191,0.000035902034,0.000002792816,0.00018116018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917626,0.00008780743,0.0002947557,0.00007965121,0.00015094374,0.00021060056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907404,0.00009493087,0.000101512436,0.0002981146,0.00024179395,0.0001895795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057179754,0.000059224105,0.0000878548,0.00031663946,0.0008265265,0.0001029661,0.0002677169,0.00013037767,0.00019094413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007115162,0.000060459744,0.000014886342,0.00087265094,0.0005674575,0.0030849332,0.00004831355,0.0004397772,0.0001794041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014653416,0.000030082525,0.004879472,0.0000021987637,0.00000404475,1.306802e-7,0.001070448,0.000014827623,0.000036022095,0.99179685,0.00062075094,0.0015437138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016458106,0.000007546095,0.0018845991,0.000019423054,0.000004315094,0.0000019307342,0.0019164797,0.00004297943,0.000045139903,0.009485799,0.9863544,0.000072773226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7503449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.948244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9857337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029427273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019519038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6357057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596830003","doi":"","title":"Privilege and Limitations: The Impact of Raising the Discoverability of Claims on Solicitor-Client Privilege","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Privilege (computing); Waiver; Discoverability; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03946639791377807,"score_gpt":0.37342911849171884,"score_spread":0.33396272057794074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596830003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9593797,0.00016254789,0.0011621917,0.028569378,0.00021979556,0.00020968774,0.0000024901638,0.0000063086536,0.010287911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854654,0.0007971702,0.000018772676,0.00012312557,0.00030809114,0.0000044923668,8.267754e-7,0.0000054201155,0.00019555619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981447,0.0006255378,0.0002982306,0.00008988674,0.000310492,0.0005311764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973687,0.0017946512,0.00039970007,0.00018551554,0.00021140851,0.000040029987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00552806,0.00007357921,0.00010944683,0.000054573135,0.00073774974,0.00009833399,0.0002490063,0.000040804927,0.000023344259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026392553,0.000038770602,0.000094562965,0.00033783636,0.00033653434,0.00036430568,0.000017737639,0.0011217031,0.0000023737414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002954717,0.00014287395,0.006266668,0.000002569161,0.000068466485,1.5509025e-8,0.013952999,0.0001338952,0.00023000252,0.96099585,0.00028141533,0.017895697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053471193,0.0008461099,0.13300608,0.000048074537,0.00006921453,0.000021319032,0.032511238,0.00023067425,0.00014892295,0.8091569,0.023250572,0.00017620942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016429242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006063888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15183899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003473474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034115799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60519964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597055904","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: The Vault - Justice Institute of British Columbia's Institutional Repository: What goes in The Vault","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vault (architecture); Economic Justice; Advertising; Political science; Art; Business; Law; Visual arts","score_opus":0.05934125666411053,"score_gpt":0.3509630680962626,"score_spread":0.29162181143215204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597055904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036209202,0.0027843786,0.000031372274,0.09294312,0.019469118,0.0010979922,0.00015446603,0.00009901948,0.8797996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10167538,0.012386591,0.0017725944,0.028468393,0.0113185095,0.0005474447,0.00086204056,0.00007003557,0.842899],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615985,0.00080200983,0.0008570386,0.00037836307,0.0014517191,0.0003510067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996184,0.0010961489,0.00063658494,0.00054894533,0.0014391543,0.00009515172],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003805914,0.00017203485,0.0003184535,0.00010327117,0.0016703142,0.004158121,0.0015157438,0.0004477271,0.00045969326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034177476,0.0001610062,0.00012030906,0.0015584028,0.0016835373,0.0038524678,0.00010137449,0.0012373627,0.000045102926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039750203,0.0001731992,0.00015427305,0.000058607042,0.000055896257,0.000016332626,0.012765815,0.000026359592,8.893655e-7,0.027357286,0.956637,0.002750359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016258673,0.000019459701,0.0007043646,0.00027560486,0.00017615233,0.00003658237,0.07816731,0.000007665244,6.264877e-7,0.0020750624,0.9181742,0.00020035435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5996652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6435446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098054454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003045888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0104114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598932699","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Authorised Law Reports: Australia – Commonwealth","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.14688033596624198,"score_gpt":0.4412786352511648,"score_spread":0.2943982992849228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598932699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000032198528,0.00035949133,0.000013881556,0.12809335,0.010577946,0.0004195422,0.000068085064,0.00048190868,0.8599536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012826848,0.00044495627,0.0045865052,0.013881628,0.0074488423,0.00006716008,0.0011526941,0.000062769905,0.9595286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681634,0.00053303933,0.00093219173,0.00038130936,0.0007081425,0.0006289655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971736,0.00057866547,0.00091016234,0.00066657487,0.00024836086,0.00042264434],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018161684,0.00027251831,0.00036550636,0.00019859857,0.0011520698,0.0009609721,0.0005056089,0.0007316263,0.06389136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009809837,0.00025937,0.00014647008,0.00088487903,0.0004066413,0.0032795046,0.000086587745,0.0012234199,0.0009894959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015943192,0.00005809262,0.00034558086,0.00002379105,0.000023476518,0.000005659211,0.0026469887,8.2356856e-8,3.0338487e-7,0.3813142,0.6152591,0.00032115713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004383186,0.000011489475,0.00012633833,0.000046763824,0.000056948702,0.0000067036376,0.0027637181,1.7921148e-7,0.0000096023105,0.007206892,0.9893968,0.00033069635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122935496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007138103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37413776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016392255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033030491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599173460","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1239","title":"Book Notes: The Sense of Justice Empathy in Law and Punishment, by Markus Dirk Dubber","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Empathy; Economic Justice; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.024346111322714525,"score_gpt":0.34963023515529795,"score_spread":0.3252841238325834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599173460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064346,0.0016446317,0.00032507518,0.049391538,0.0005510148,0.00013788024,0.000007720752,0.000011429342,0.94149613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858063,0.00047967766,0.0003674478,0.0115768965,0.00025188352,0.000001790964,0.000001687486,0.0000071786408,0.0015071235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987434,0.0002521116,0.0003291565,0.000099315555,0.0003263777,0.0002496517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849284,0.00086469273,0.0002407854,0.0001120015,0.00017177107,0.00011789313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028566918,0.00007578632,0.000101537604,0.000042731997,0.0008921235,0.00022601156,0.00013366736,0.00007412413,0.00048670138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004557046,0.000058517668,0.000031707867,0.00026551643,0.0004311934,0.00069442444,0.00002213158,0.0005826783,0.000011217736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030716856,0.00012921295,0.00040597125,0.00000754863,0.000016095244,0.0000141478695,0.015888017,0.0000028653076,0.00017514429,0.96160257,0.020856112,0.0008715899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035870858,0.000029621091,0.0007702878,0.000029967754,0.000048869828,0.00005961143,0.015857978,0.000006512777,0.00024632932,0.011126562,0.9713538,0.00011173586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057244677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15589505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070771544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017705889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9490332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599494580","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4808","title":"LEARNING FROM BEAR-WALKER: INDIGENOUS LEGAL ORDERS AND INTERCULTURAL LEGAL EDUCATION IN CANADIAN LAW SCHOOLS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal profession; Law; Legal education; Political science; Viewpoints; Legal research; Sociology; Empowerment; Legal realism","score_opus":0.03796338000169707,"score_gpt":0.3857957892049488,"score_spread":0.3478324092032517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599494580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79612976,0.000046981062,0.0000051621632,0.017791783,0.0006884366,0.00029511523,0.0000077005025,0.000016276235,0.18501881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99416715,0.000023881059,0.00040631427,0.0016610319,0.0004085845,0.000018089237,0.000015184555,0.000011116543,0.0032886553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889547,0.00011521964,0.00022913747,0.00022463585,0.00021966279,0.0003158839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989195,0.000110683904,0.0002025372,0.00022381365,0.00025373106,0.00028974313],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004719871,0.00009923859,0.00013810617,0.00019147826,0.0011032202,0.0017042138,0.0005617352,0.00010564647,0.0002508897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001985459,0.00010884519,0.000021451942,0.00019551859,0.00016882313,0.0031554718,0.00007483327,0.0005034051,0.0000618188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020472912,0.0004945622,0.3440875,0.00016143413,0.00014145722,0.000028630164,0.24394995,0.00037553886,0.0013535578,0.32516527,0.0150901005,0.06894728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002539347,0.000042054096,0.20056295,0.00012496072,0.00006680137,0.0000015386438,0.036249515,0.000024207731,0.00013180135,0.0003177257,0.7619668,0.0002576774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9193725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7468767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023103466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041204267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599625897","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Advantage: American Illness and Comparative Civil Procedure","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; American exceptionalism; Exceptionalism; Globalization; Political science; Convergence (economics); Law; Economics; Economic growth; Economy","score_opus":0.01814002576587317,"score_gpt":0.33988598429890965,"score_spread":0.3217459585330365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599625897","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3309286,0.0016815957,0.00010567058,0.4540008,0.0006085942,0.0005484805,0.000002175403,0.00003566621,0.21208844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897252,0.0012834514,0.000020099475,0.0007749298,0.00023232283,0.000018536672,9.202105e-7,0.000003926244,0.00794067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832624,0.00017337722,0.00012068428,0.00008188987,0.00018623014,0.0011115976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991896,0.00016115617,0.00013387072,0.000061904895,0.00027945644,0.00017399897],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012677249,0.00006120518,0.00006828281,0.000061040686,0.0039880653,0.0006284683,0.00018037451,0.000026738064,0.00013321714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032965495,0.000043422093,0.00001751527,0.00041258783,0.00037121357,0.0006160154,0.000006799879,0.0014961177,0.000060516108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030109736,0.000010715637,0.0026924578,4.4223992e-7,0.000030035668,1.7147883e-7,0.012607558,6.916356e-7,0.0000054318243,0.9558945,0.0052153515,0.02353966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008010818,0.000040692605,0.0046931906,0.0000026269195,0.000007959513,0.000035181678,0.25385472,0.000010376719,0.0000022610704,0.08443098,0.6567438,0.00009807487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4492371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99052405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8714635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008437829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018379344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599813865","doi":"","title":"COULD COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION COMPANIES IMPROVE ACCESS TO JUSTICE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Legal service; Economic Justice; Corporate law; Business; Profit (economics); Corporate structure; Legal profession; Law; Public relations; Accounting; Political science; Corporate governance; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.04908567714572008,"score_gpt":0.4133352650883119,"score_spread":0.3642495879425918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599813865","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40895772,0.00027491438,0.055165645,0.5004445,0.002825547,0.00049710844,0.000020772288,0.00013268067,0.031681143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928494,0.00065969245,0.000034906465,0.0019950545,0.0006375742,0.000009743453,0.000002223054,0.0000072224393,0.0038041857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975406,0.00063252787,0.00022414727,0.000086271706,0.00030121562,0.0012152444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982367,0.00059181347,0.0001882247,0.00014975778,0.000694382,0.00013913585],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051305313,0.00007950537,0.00010234766,0.00010213701,0.002134146,0.00040333247,0.00053603813,0.00007011224,0.00019604414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003515817,0.000059271577,0.000040810002,0.00044300366,0.00010992378,0.0015222869,0.000046387886,0.0020492757,0.00014857622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044886503,0.000100881334,0.0008230157,0.0000017877207,0.00004118522,2.1024309e-7,0.003162567,0.0000017540365,0.0009412372,0.9714625,0.0035806186,0.019839363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007754129,0.00024087072,0.004363325,0.000031430023,0.00009387061,0.000026716201,0.039935265,0.0000031137824,0.00026913668,0.3223293,0.6316766,0.0002549599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003992901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035457574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6491332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016140104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064628897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600983359","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Treaties","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.23081986901313,"score_gpt":0.46769370739574495,"score_spread":0.23687383838261494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600983359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013577466,0.0005805208,0.0000015931962,0.17288907,0.0027297144,0.0003781926,0.00012428637,0.00019434726,0.8230887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010061623,0.0021775486,0.0019489754,0.0072139963,0.0040121768,0.000096273245,0.00049561146,0.000065106164,0.9829841],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614835,0.00095247757,0.00057935744,0.00044521817,0.00093051,0.0009441066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669623,0.00096099486,0.00016971276,0.0005910362,0.00093667296,0.0006453366],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025617196,0.00023017768,0.00026770448,0.0014566409,0.0023173972,0.0018349827,0.0012226722,0.00070270465,0.09440059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041912906,0.00021921951,0.00010416246,0.0019370163,0.0007704083,0.0029798232,0.00009358243,0.0016814995,0.0028399052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015709197,0.000018559833,0.000113592956,0.000009255414,0.000020979816,0.0000076774795,0.0058281133,2.5569822e-8,9.0652186e-8,0.36872733,0.6230376,0.0022352485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045006036,0.000023786279,0.00008558024,0.000047170073,0.000015575702,0.0000016851066,0.018103378,3.58612e-7,0.000008332514,0.006272379,0.97513056,0.0002661997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98848003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94998896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36245495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005325908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049847092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992012},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2601398572","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Authorised Law Reports: Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04321082073353175,"score_gpt":0.34603132718285734,"score_spread":0.30282050644932557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601398572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000074813793,0.00059632934,0.000005472404,0.15601386,0.01223347,0.00021872,0.000056158624,0.00020411896,0.8306644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005510187,0.00027854322,0.0017368249,0.030730968,0.006453782,0.00004395341,0.0007080599,0.000046191137,0.9544915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976976,0.00024602216,0.00061156444,0.00027940547,0.00072684634,0.00043859865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979558,0.0005312258,0.00053825835,0.0004477377,0.00023057216,0.00029639102],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079907273,0.00018819715,0.00023354156,0.00009025797,0.0008790736,0.0005559472,0.0003550222,0.0003664619,0.04533998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013603969,0.00017883487,0.000067175846,0.000644157,0.0001691455,0.0020089303,0.000057417947,0.0007130029,0.00009779881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.8013213e-7,0.000018028433,0.00011837667,0.000011474992,0.000020934809,0.0000102982785,0.0011913258,1.02864526e-7,1.5536455e-7,0.25871068,0.73943466,0.0004832994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021451413,0.0000027345516,0.000030124414,0.000022159382,0.000033543245,0.0000042262805,0.0033597902,1.7871736e-7,0.000009146942,0.0019901134,0.9942757,0.0002508606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97271925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25672057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029901194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026065363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97945595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601889647","doi":"","title":"‘Room Left to Grow’: Canada’s First Aboriginal Justice Minister One Year In","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.034877808526987665,"score_gpt":0.36523165828272297,"score_spread":0.3303538497557353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601889647","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023448545,0.0000020686064,0.00015988226,0.50839216,0.0006504127,0.000093502334,0.000005689846,0.000017225711,0.4672305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.890146,0.000010339929,0.0009894888,0.007676098,0.00028611653,0.0000062763347,9.724866e-7,0.0000041970056,0.100880474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992716,0.00004790351,0.00012974453,0.00011834686,0.00024254153,0.00018988304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935144,0.00028991897,0.000030809402,0.00010285788,0.000113195405,0.00011178711],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031640008,0.000043851727,0.000053857995,0.00005867353,0.00020023788,0.00006716257,0.00013630273,0.00003276906,0.0055748555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005676852,0.000034670808,0.000008416414,0.00027048637,0.000029939552,0.00034741184,0.000008312521,0.0000744479,0.00038313106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014788213,0.00008204068,0.013450977,0.0000060747434,0.000005229303,0.0000022070888,0.009656171,5.4680686e-7,0.00008440548,0.4594818,0.51608026,0.0011355119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009753952,0.0000072232842,0.016860992,0.000010913454,0.0000050807203,1.8532275e-7,0.0031922916,2.6863273e-7,0.000032568296,0.00015231251,0.9795692,0.000071426395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81956816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8666975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029720698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036003084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602033633","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4368","title":"JUDGING SELECTION: APPOINTING CANADIAN JUDGES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Political science; Humanities; Commission; Law; Art","score_opus":0.09361937532165128,"score_gpt":0.4106273228878456,"score_spread":0.3170079475661943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602033633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12793833,0.000070003276,0.00040004274,0.047755335,0.0017121782,0.0003531883,0.000005340516,0.00008639143,0.8216792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898293,0.000005857894,0.002283505,0.003316868,0.0014886068,0.000015682464,0.0000024778924,0.000011822303,0.0030459068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893135,0.00009530953,0.00019410846,0.000118583666,0.00025129222,0.0004093754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892616,0.00020103046,0.000112071604,0.000116938834,0.00028807574,0.00035569174],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009484934,0.00007162686,0.00009412825,0.00028792673,0.00057731,0.00023822875,0.00030171665,0.00006934439,0.0020364458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017112365,0.00008147032,0.000026669524,0.000998461,0.000058401325,0.0018187752,0.00003487119,0.00021041647,0.000267245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031160493,0.00028534117,0.42365715,0.00018513564,0.00009893056,0.0000017269299,0.10928721,0.00023765602,0.0009149694,0.25071493,0.19023658,0.024349198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007726274,0.00001030122,0.06418585,0.000025806155,0.00008326752,0.0000015608642,0.009205709,0.000019236377,0.00044523922,0.00010328763,0.9256663,0.00017621706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17846937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0778024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.861891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017794916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011145173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602416461","doi":"","title":"Reflective Practice & Reflective Inquiry: A Critical Imperative for Enhancing Law Student Learning and Legal Professionalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective practice; Legal education; Operationalization; Legal profession; Legal practice; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Curriculum; Economic Justice; Psychology; Practice of law; Lifelong learning; Political science; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05979861176545198,"score_gpt":0.5304043226780903,"score_spread":0.47060571091263836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602416461","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10366715,0.0028030467,0.024957698,0.55872804,0.0049401955,0.0018381395,0.000006985844,0.00014684725,0.3029119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99144024,0.000663675,0.0011170617,0.0011268213,0.0012819183,0.00007357612,0.0000019194451,0.000019028568,0.0042757415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968217,0.00082650664,0.00029326958,0.00028314354,0.000447173,0.0013281879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614084,0.0017813229,0.0004668776,0.00012655857,0.0013660056,0.00011839291],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070494055,0.0001413013,0.00018017451,0.00008166672,0.009739259,0.0014097446,0.00027600222,0.00012741145,0.000031850297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018648693,0.00013069564,0.000061941304,0.00013269449,0.00051896006,0.0039062863,0.000066544446,0.00364697,0.000008002287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014339686,0.00011632268,0.00009418281,0.0000031725285,0.00011547803,0.0000026540565,0.040900283,7.4878903e-7,0.00041156192,0.95607567,0.00009907184,0.0020374851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071666663,0.00054591295,0.00029002735,0.0000530886,0.00011093574,0.00016165203,0.40432224,0.000007679122,0.00016208518,0.29317653,0.30020255,0.0002506384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022699411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023017593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8877731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013694909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008999056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602437525","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Statutory Compilation Table","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Table (database); Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.38930601372837187,"score_gpt":0.5595117266839229,"score_spread":0.17020571295555104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602437525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000112735244,0.00021050408,0.000007308981,0.15717377,0.00465419,0.0006917175,0.0002610665,0.00009772127,0.836791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011648477,0.0005750512,0.0014557273,0.0024276383,0.0062186713,0.00013939406,0.0012203406,0.00006030193,0.9762544],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917302,0.0026215187,0.00055450003,0.00057993305,0.0029168779,0.0015969793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98772514,0.0031682106,0.000155809,0.00074351486,0.007358189,0.0008491632],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025598474,0.00019005834,0.0002446092,0.0026953444,0.006256757,0.0027682271,0.0012356585,0.0011098018,0.027423948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014973282,0.00019922685,0.00005844896,0.0044357423,0.0015622593,0.0018592298,0.00011108976,0.008465591,0.002803796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002582631,0.000028056933,0.000046854075,0.000012251858,0.000010465341,0.0000044429275,0.0033507545,7.527531e-7,0.0000069163543,0.3294,0.6660555,0.0010814238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006402401,0.00002456939,0.00017574236,0.00004141318,0.0000059532313,0.0000010824896,0.019239329,0.0000071405825,0.000011563107,0.0044020545,0.9758012,0.00022591128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98682535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99017656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32499796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019372904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08457138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602791599","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Authorised Law Reports: New Zealand","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.062446807928047215,"score_gpt":0.3783477776381505,"score_spread":0.3159009697101033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602791599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006047852,0.00064167083,0.000016926195,0.18936433,0.007961485,0.00026254606,0.000019242521,0.00040611593,0.8013216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004799633,0.0006221967,0.0049529807,0.014220442,0.011892025,0.000022721335,0.00058589596,0.000051909283,0.96717185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770916,0.00024297123,0.0006766493,0.00033445496,0.0005806641,0.0004560822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977966,0.00049932534,0.00061475043,0.0004991472,0.00016052039,0.00042967053],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009806295,0.00021889817,0.00027702568,0.00016820974,0.00065925065,0.0010088386,0.00037335834,0.0005890925,0.0593233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012836698,0.00020014631,0.000119914046,0.0007500131,0.00019454936,0.0031952406,0.00006800323,0.0007804353,0.0006555566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019386528,0.000033667,0.00027897654,0.000007678404,0.000026950745,0.0000049707273,0.0050355,7.5647385e-8,4.6174986e-7,0.21153955,0.78154856,0.0015216635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052773277,0.0000077255345,0.00004711906,0.000033986744,0.000053558368,0.000006228678,0.0015100077,1.1715435e-7,0.000009806063,0.0135575645,0.9844469,0.00027421332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12372974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045688427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20289834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085574684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006192522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603976016","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4843","title":"BEING THE CHANGE: SOCIAL JUSTICE IN EXTERNSHIP PROGRAM EVALUATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Social justice; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Public relations; Narrative; Sociology; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Pedagogy; Social science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.3521164757445121,"score_gpt":0.5410518283749198,"score_spread":0.18893535263040773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603976016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24914694,0.00005951583,0.000065302935,0.18396129,0.0027719464,0.0035375422,0.0000068458985,0.00007391958,0.5603767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944424,0.000015007444,0.0003474661,0.0017299061,0.0021375867,0.0005153594,0.0000031471627,0.000011158785,0.0007979522],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983457,0.00030477133,0.00025252817,0.0001937214,0.0006408668,0.00026242144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846035,0.00032878006,0.0003281276,0.00033096096,0.00048813515,0.000063629705],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028401196,0.000087005064,0.000117454736,0.0001240322,0.0015052933,0.00094817433,0.0010424894,0.000091184615,0.000326805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053240466,0.000077980025,0.000034777157,0.00037220377,0.00021310356,0.0019313548,0.00013384376,0.00029992932,0.0000573806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015637405,0.0007407811,0.029451467,0.00031441226,0.00005139239,0.0000048144907,0.20230898,0.000049695296,0.0001777598,0.2102088,0.01669697,0.53983855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004445534,0.000041612097,0.685982,0.00009534337,0.0004741401,4.272871e-7,0.011924875,0.0002963159,0.00007688748,0.002307267,0.2981317,0.00022489819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049416027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030591716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74529546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112291105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053253927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605232142","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4807","title":"OUTSIDER EDUCATION: INDIGENOUS LAW AND LAND-BASED LEARNING","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Political science; Indigenous education; Humanities; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Law; Ethnology; Geography; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07382627404369328,"score_gpt":0.43296131928994275,"score_spread":0.35913504524624945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605232142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23261178,0.000095898045,0.00017744918,0.04033698,0.0011107774,0.0004457507,0.0000046630284,0.000057431276,0.7251593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902824,0.000012576988,0.0010301366,0.003888795,0.0004839319,0.000021865526,0.0000031564327,0.000009541212,0.0042676036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923265,0.000073530806,0.00015364384,0.00015272976,0.00022609343,0.00016136571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893165,0.00016705299,0.00023072587,0.00025043596,0.00029864573,0.00012147178],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004708562,0.00006781798,0.000100874415,0.000083385225,0.0014226064,0.0008251603,0.0004189931,0.00006483132,0.0002734488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015334334,0.000071707305,0.000019034418,0.00011945345,0.00020160039,0.0010871233,0.0000633276,0.00020574132,0.000059188125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017969613,0.00094078894,0.41441935,0.0004888664,0.00010467296,0.000006625017,0.11869376,0.00045888152,0.00040246372,0.37924305,0.018500553,0.06656129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024133813,0.000038237624,0.108918205,0.00007086382,0.000104689,7.857842e-7,0.003395925,0.000016100097,0.0002638957,0.0006587047,0.88609535,0.0001959352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020075945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002908835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8675948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003510858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011714105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605481763","doi":"","title":"All in the Family (of Licensees): Pragmatic Approaches to Implementing Paralegal Integration into Family Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Family law; Law; Competence (human resources); Political science; Monopoly; Legal profession; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.11172415544488148,"score_gpt":0.3741320805876767,"score_spread":0.2624079251427952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605481763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63669777,0.00049718,0.015806174,0.27478102,0.00040200684,0.0006864636,0.0000029466717,0.000031481133,0.07109498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996618,0.00026261157,0.0005659123,0.0017548067,0.00025177037,0.000028016275,0.0000022917075,0.0000075898784,0.0005090116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974502,0.00058210053,0.0004227289,0.00012609383,0.0003996575,0.0010192267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990495,0.0003844519,0.00026179547,0.0001337479,0.00011998666,0.000050532784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00808235,0.00008880177,0.00011021991,0.000135813,0.00041535473,0.00016932598,0.00038086157,0.000052021045,0.000027566359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006151511,0.00005371331,0.00005157214,0.0005736654,0.0000910428,0.0008515895,0.000020027794,0.00088697777,0.000028829192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011692905,0.00006251609,0.00035777738,0.0000017691623,0.000020998037,2.175536e-7,0.029887864,0.0000017156258,0.0011865646,0.942421,0.0004473815,0.025600497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005089082,0.00017607864,0.0029880893,0.000059124704,0.000033966302,0.000016359772,0.26511008,0.000013605726,0.00010645693,0.36673594,0.3640519,0.00019948643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012674348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07954743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5756851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005842074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00296802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99390036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606597006","doi":"","title":"LIVING BY PERCENTAGES: A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE ON THE ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF LAWYERS ACTING AS TALENT AGENTS AND MANAGERS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Perspective (graphical); Duty; Public relations; Scholarship; Business; Competence (human resources); Professional responsibility; Loyalty; Entertainment; Legal service; Work (physics); Duty of care; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Marketing; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02438528281335842,"score_gpt":0.36760768782744796,"score_spread":0.3432224050140895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606597006","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18696219,0.000110747875,0.00017434392,0.7380612,0.00013457678,0.00015261638,0.0000070143947,0.000010281424,0.074387066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99312735,0.0015996109,0.000008065043,0.0029136802,0.000089365516,0.000006309498,3.8681983e-7,0.0000065687914,0.0022486919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985545,0.00028407303,0.00013211879,0.000113280315,0.00020307668,0.0007129303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878234,0.00069810275,0.0001357857,0.00008984839,0.00016343524,0.00013050434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023010084,0.000060223672,0.00005742483,0.00009134602,0.0011263262,0.00010499953,0.00018841519,0.00007571631,0.0003500492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017495623,0.00003954767,0.000035199708,0.00022897299,0.00018516768,0.00025605405,0.000011211675,0.0014290139,0.000020918236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034506959,0.000021293881,0.001973579,4.492131e-7,0.000046956364,1.717914e-7,0.014909432,2.0804147e-7,0.000099345,0.97501564,0.0031590431,0.0047704447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021593427,0.0001395467,0.009195731,0.000081241466,0.000047338923,0.000043901757,0.6408103,0.000002533091,0.000022325738,0.17879684,0.17045066,0.00019366783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20248936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34593552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80616516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022639171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054629166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9690979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606622415","doi":"10.71781/16462","title":"The authority of moral conscience in Joseph Butler's ethics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.18971465469259577,"score_gpt":0.5077961984316173,"score_spread":0.31808154373902153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606622415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15937933,0.000113988084,0.0000023614857,0.030909248,0.0020631368,0.000607035,0.0000196725,0.000001372924,0.80690384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94083804,0.00014629621,0.0011300695,0.00011508058,0.0000927038,0.000029493087,0.00008720029,0.000006752059,0.05755435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857074,0.00031460632,0.00031458263,0.00018523075,0.00044216728,0.00017269919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821895,0.0007760996,0.0003599375,0.00017918098,0.00041882912,0.000047027614],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041120127,0.00007651044,0.0001271835,0.000070847345,0.0008492504,0.00056000677,0.00083731656,0.00027240094,0.0012547377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004862147,0.000064217864,0.000028983564,0.0008355281,0.00031657558,0.00054799364,0.000029216006,0.0010314987,0.00010074776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007024411,0.00027677458,0.0016472198,0.000023723636,0.00002075087,0.0000032312519,0.47692773,0.000013833156,0.00015773265,0.43461663,0.0018781153,0.08436402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001665764,0.000018355568,0.007385082,0.00012094203,0.00001737976,3.1657842e-7,0.13285169,0.0000031316702,0.00050434435,0.011564141,0.84719944,0.00016860962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03487729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27258712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8453213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013672552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011764297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606762169","doi":"10.71781/1993","title":"La relation changeante entre la Cour suprême du Canada et la société civile : l'impact des acteurs sociaux sur l'accès à la justice et la production du droit","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051058863413327445,"score_gpt":0.4127003215028356,"score_spread":0.36164145808950815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606762169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5285483,0.000096490876,0.000028331213,0.02442205,0.0022964429,0.0007988956,0.00031191792,0.000013918481,0.44348368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90595514,0.0013791065,0.00028700652,0.0002453991,0.00107882,0.0001035596,0.001195588,0.00007137152,0.089683995],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99256676,0.0047205077,0.0006585435,0.00071458763,0.0008206437,0.0005189558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99143165,0.0057431306,0.0012108507,0.00031225482,0.0010606135,0.00024152506],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006397706,0.00047032625,0.0004678754,0.00017730691,0.0013810148,0.0016844112,0.0006685285,0.00079743273,0.005847757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007288509,0.00046386072,0.00015692934,0.0009938983,0.0004100026,0.0038742623,0.000088067194,0.0013165935,0.00026667243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041715062,0.0012469647,0.019448807,0.0003367914,0.0007115719,0.00008887267,0.4015327,0.00014861987,0.00097083586,0.056758896,0.07854109,0.4397977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005622809,0.000033501376,0.08016393,0.00039317692,0.00045462142,0.000051370807,0.06164931,0.000038456936,0.00013977305,0.0006182551,0.85533744,0.00055790396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44495013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8164469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77679634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011484075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01645323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607326201","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4556","title":"Gavin Drewry, Louis Blom-Cooper, Charles Blake, The Court of Appeal","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Restructuring; Law; Legislation; Economic Justice; Political science; Scholarship; Subject (documents); Sociology; History; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09751438710130468,"score_gpt":0.38737287996961767,"score_spread":0.289858492868313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607326201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46385866,0.00045829162,0.00039878004,0.08741265,0.0015769342,0.0010360443,0.000050974224,0.000091771515,0.4451159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99145675,0.00018860756,0.00038769923,0.001796373,0.00057987886,0.000022380722,0.0000039180627,0.000013634169,0.0055507314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854314,0.00015430836,0.0003524439,0.00017679509,0.0005366055,0.00023669994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829394,0.00046881393,0.00027035412,0.00030640577,0.00055457896,0.000105885294],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007349384,0.00010077661,0.00017660344,0.00012537865,0.00047853176,0.000109000466,0.00080477475,0.00008072442,0.0010927764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014388267,0.00008305276,0.000055504035,0.0008545026,0.00045825233,0.00066466513,0.000094178686,0.00024539395,0.00013673583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034234163,0.001718363,0.025895206,0.00036321324,0.0003137319,0.000017513501,0.21207838,0.0006171394,0.0045991195,0.16212903,0.57873976,0.013186197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003414087,0.00007700977,0.041297562,0.00007291264,0.00023727136,0.0000050901212,0.01099372,0.00003281971,0.0022429384,0.00022872417,0.944219,0.00025152985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005215764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066468125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5275981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033726716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089545484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607676879","doi":"10.4324/9781315449807-24","title":"Is access to the profession access to justice? Lessons from Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.20931505651697802,"score_gpt":0.4892967282583131,"score_spread":0.2799816717413351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607676879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012431815,0.000011172026,0.00009150581,0.457084,0.00332654,0.00049296377,0.00012530744,0.000027963903,0.5387162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016866304,0.000038010647,0.00017563805,0.12677288,0.0027671407,0.00006401006,0.000049293027,0.000027264838,0.8532395],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810386,0.000080127735,0.00030927188,0.00041266592,0.0007988264,0.00029524462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976409,0.00054768426,0.00023526541,0.0005326119,0.0007561287,0.00028742343],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046750132,0.0002025687,0.00018568266,0.0001133181,0.0015252571,0.0013820801,0.0017974757,0.00022631651,0.05447786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000760057,0.00014504557,0.00004298557,0.000310273,0.00008274908,0.00086184294,0.00039376458,0.0005407296,0.0011487718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066047273,0.000008045462,0.000030112413,0.0000047798776,0.000022057564,7.794218e-7,0.009171113,6.418919e-7,8.221303e-7,0.09137733,0.8962371,0.0031406255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031631673,0.0000068377763,0.00061724713,0.00007189913,0.00007704328,1.1020534e-7,0.004004364,8.754646e-7,0.000022343831,0.004795626,0.99013424,0.00023777495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9418134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99283767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33031112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043233787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008637366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607818865","doi":"","title":"Quarter century celebration for school for Legal Practice : news","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"De Rebus","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Legal education; Period (music); Political science; Legal practice; Law; History; Art","score_opus":0.06301921399854703,"score_gpt":0.42236587608899373,"score_spread":0.3593466620904467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607818865","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008331877,0.00022552065,0.05886539,0.616473,0.0039556986,0.0020041857,0.000031152496,0.00018590607,0.30992728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87178105,0.00008923843,0.08155958,0.023157734,0.005493071,0.0007543154,0.00014189139,0.00003439711,0.016988687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992298,0.00012708078,0.00014760617,0.00011858244,0.00017915985,0.00019776981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983356,0.00051062397,0.00012953137,0.00010536009,0.00076286274,0.00015604746],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013250274,0.000050265462,0.00005814826,0.00004806749,0.00031855496,0.00032650543,0.00009490537,0.00008787058,0.00006793274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010859513,0.00005192835,0.000035747213,0.00022263847,0.000027438624,0.0016456776,0.0000044511476,0.00013229194,0.00007307608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011554185,0.00012154066,0.00022428835,0.000008232345,0.000015395819,3.5808964e-7,0.020994557,0.000009209347,0.00008351493,0.3318738,0.6363961,0.010157463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032615205,0.0000504134,0.00005734019,0.000002433212,0.000020549547,0.0000016410168,0.04470032,0.000096406315,0.000038422877,0.0023212023,0.9523148,0.000070306975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004339648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020637873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8634492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002009485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024631622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99747247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610263201","doi":"","title":"Court Governance: The Challenge of Change","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Mandate; Accountability; Corporate governance; Political science; Public administration; Law; Judicial review; Institution; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.11725451236170639,"score_gpt":0.36011969365183,"score_spread":0.2428651812901236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610263201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017288452,0.0060148877,0.00040113964,0.31609672,0.0014414077,0.0002957502,0.0000031797651,0.00003131111,0.6584271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981469,0.0146394875,0.000032300777,0.00035590987,0.00062019774,0.000007918944,2.7898014e-7,0.0000051739717,0.0028697564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986785,0.00013984501,0.00015582502,0.00006025676,0.00026522376,0.00070036104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993603,0.00006463696,0.0002552304,0.00010400327,0.00018094399,0.000034881657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028244117,0.00004647297,0.00006164478,0.000025279773,0.00045064747,0.000027316915,0.0003005787,0.00004172614,0.00070118037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002747864,0.000032746982,0.000044355278,0.00025969787,0.0001250949,0.0004895895,0.000010887459,0.0012921878,0.00003526078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007307105,0.000057670735,0.0003944226,7.206817e-7,0.000023268918,1.6625445e-7,0.023030687,1.8539819e-8,0.000002342727,0.9623016,0.00054514245,0.0136366645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015595542,0.0001113175,0.0030897541,0.000008904511,0.000022601527,0.000014709502,0.053937145,0.0000015569882,0.000015530375,0.45657277,0.48599,0.00007974597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070392005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016922064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9641805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040013553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036122536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610816547","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1314","title":"The \"Ambitious Modesty\" of Harry Arthurs' Humane Professionalism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Normative; Legal education; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.04079411867215693,"score_gpt":0.3749037266108592,"score_spread":0.33410960793870226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610816547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006449941,0.00037530647,0.00015367309,0.08725288,0.001058681,0.000109091736,0.000004713068,0.00002353534,0.9045722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98810655,0.00006854152,0.00044764508,0.00075819937,0.00072146417,0.0000073377987,0.0000047176113,0.000008109733,0.009877409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852705,0.00030704297,0.00034454864,0.00008322789,0.0005027833,0.000235348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986856,0.00032005121,0.00034575278,0.00013032054,0.00045806088,0.00006023296],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014203575,0.0000686997,0.000088188855,0.000037879356,0.0030953684,0.00031145892,0.00026090202,0.000070012145,0.0004906055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020780248,0.00004957023,0.0000648021,0.00021682707,0.00037351178,0.00058784976,0.000017025552,0.000564614,0.00003920393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008163942,0.00009930817,0.00013046096,0.000001851728,0.000009513382,0.00000265687,0.0012494198,0.00001708607,0.00020590838,0.9792519,0.017923921,0.0010998116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019602655,0.00001511962,0.0011884192,0.000026107402,0.000013577765,0.000026074871,0.0029088487,0.000017382687,0.00009901143,0.4822068,0.51322114,0.0000814863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070058115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17654665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9816566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062808336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057668856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611090212","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Open Court Principle in an Era of Online Publication: Questioning Presumptive Public Access to Parties' and Witnesses' Personal Information","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Law; Court of record; Political science; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Internet privacy; Personally identifiable information; Economic Justice; Business; Original jurisdiction; Computer science","score_opus":0.2750259198183424,"score_gpt":0.47237295946514796,"score_spread":0.19734703964680556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611090212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.914016,0.000008138725,0.000147564,0.08345884,0.00011135775,0.00049811276,0.00002395653,0.000025335607,0.0017106872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980907,0.000025106121,0.00010398764,0.00092259585,0.00012708484,0.000006840173,0.000047653324,0.0000062838267,0.0006697434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985405,0.0004252725,0.00026960837,0.0002158276,0.00032329268,0.0002254773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977597,0.00016432474,0.00056841207,0.00039759566,0.00094250275,0.00016747144],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001831087,0.00010437619,0.00014409635,0.00023210744,0.0016800854,0.0060925656,0.0016313645,0.00008628017,0.000048731312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020201637,0.000104074556,0.000020223735,0.0005313232,0.00023919843,0.03601742,0.0006321707,0.00050783367,0.000010852107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032952994,0.000045824912,0.9704872,0.000014296836,0.000009964169,0.000001091255,0.013597093,0.000004802807,0.000007247539,0.010919938,0.0000019437307,0.004877685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002946155,0.000021368367,0.949579,0.00011422898,0.000012773436,0.0000014983143,0.0072465814,0.000003198072,0.000016426253,0.00009095397,0.042497035,0.00012231691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062106474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025779366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0840747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016623113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008647165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611107020","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.v70i2.1638","title":"Duty to Publish","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Duty; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Business; Political science; Law; Advertising","score_opus":0.0421741435645667,"score_gpt":0.4130003054737329,"score_spread":0.3708261619091662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611107020","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022195824,0.00020365942,0.0000017118758,0.22988032,0.691793,0.00016191072,0.00007345762,0.000005141832,0.07765881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.066584826,0.00010453354,0.000048096488,0.0011754452,0.91272366,0.0000062883537,0.000015840078,0.000025115773,0.01931622],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979452,0.0002250605,0.00039147673,0.00012583345,0.00089059304,0.00042187137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944586,0.0005643111,0.00090983027,0.00031943043,0.0026472604,0.0011005531],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029640044,0.00014730585,0.00022000376,0.00030581697,0.0026587124,0.003529703,0.0021530883,0.00017213135,0.0014407086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021918138,0.0001165757,0.00013932552,0.00031381394,0.00035100474,0.0017769855,0.00002562783,0.002224907,0.0002063619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061339883,0.000014212435,0.00006723631,0.0000029480318,0.000052240088,0.000027931925,0.010982649,0.000001009651,2.0011278e-7,0.0015465794,0.984987,0.0023118586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017515302,0.000046867113,0.00005858534,0.000036214107,0.00006168289,0.0000015213694,0.00089520833,1.2090631e-7,0.0000017905736,0.0008483463,0.9977169,0.00015759048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.420233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5679076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22870487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072539755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056353506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611807142","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Law reform commissions: Canadian commissions and related bodies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law reform; Public administration","score_opus":0.05041458612205942,"score_gpt":0.35788573745989866,"score_spread":0.30747115133783925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611807142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015821483,0.00094535796,6.2885067e-7,0.28132537,0.0016396878,0.00036503453,0.000077476565,0.00016315619,0.71546745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010525195,0.0034975868,0.0010953806,0.013951172,0.00057504035,0.000085536405,0.0005174717,0.00005193047,0.9697007],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997742,0.00031327666,0.00061268976,0.00034991637,0.0004111795,0.0005709205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970991,0.0005751117,0.0002869196,0.000467163,0.00059232535,0.0009794082],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000925057,0.00028015592,0.00033732128,0.0003929405,0.0037329178,0.0009469317,0.000507293,0.0008094342,0.029421724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017713053,0.0002332865,0.00007753934,0.0005061956,0.00074113643,0.0012075399,0.00008662918,0.0013628172,0.00080353406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.087776e-7,0.000015507945,0.000021269107,0.000010904073,0.000028036104,0.0000018139609,0.0072667,4.3878163e-8,3.6927005e-7,0.4013133,0.59038854,0.00095296866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000851354,0.00001405282,0.000096745054,0.0001428277,0.000043828135,0.000005543804,0.021917988,0.000004619356,0.000001417632,0.012772043,0.9645889,0.00032689847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97968423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9262049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38854128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000730244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056958757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612798282","doi":"10.7202/1038489ar","title":"Heroes, Tricksters, Monsters, and Caretakers: Indigenous Law and Legal Education","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Subject (documents); Political science; Sociology; Categorization; Epistemology; Library science","score_opus":0.023274437226089406,"score_gpt":0.3214301690673661,"score_spread":0.2981557318412767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612798282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09022138,0.00088911026,0.00006460082,0.07579504,0.001987973,0.00029023923,0.000030885098,0.000054463337,0.8306663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99457306,0.00040125888,0.0004347981,0.0024754198,0.00037757502,0.0000056408917,0.0000014388528,0.000008673901,0.0017221497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990113,0.00019636212,0.00020976209,0.00013552661,0.00022746022,0.00021959779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991787,0.00015287902,0.00016269628,0.00008606124,0.00020452238,0.00021515293],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006234858,0.000083388135,0.000094884286,0.00007151877,0.0038762093,0.00041197435,0.00009855837,0.00007326911,0.00015689344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014866961,0.000061826744,0.000024756964,0.00016672236,0.0002957975,0.0017535263,0.0000175805,0.00024758285,0.000014971952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013034111,0.00006407988,0.00062447187,0.0000040843256,0.000021828548,0.000004521611,0.0046414975,5.5343772e-8,0.00006315169,0.91896856,0.0011014225,0.07449332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025350953,0.000035091805,0.00037201427,0.000029010389,0.000019521398,0.000154071,0.008290742,1.3951099e-7,0.000046123863,0.00197253,0.98872507,0.00010217533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0202833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027574513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98762363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014849186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002256433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613835221","doi":"","title":"A Diverse Law Firm: The Professionalism Imperative for 2017 - Why Law Firms in Ontario Will Quickly Have to Reflect the Diversity of the Province","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Diversity (politics); Law; Legal profession; Business; Commercial law; Political science; Practice of law","score_opus":0.06956283385131529,"score_gpt":0.3909664772793924,"score_spread":0.3214036434280771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613835221","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.405154,0.00019032894,0.00019532806,0.5552677,0.001548619,0.0020122866,0.00002040131,0.000011348709,0.035600007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825578,0.000043583685,0.000026738604,0.003522195,0.00016689494,0.00002497306,9.674169e-7,0.0000049020337,0.013651966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813473,0.0003785282,0.00020155877,0.00014023525,0.00040041615,0.0007445268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852157,0.0003204918,0.00044350995,0.0003503681,0.00032268555,0.00004136899],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038177378,0.00009326998,0.00011327751,0.000024221888,0.009875147,0.00027953408,0.0012918005,0.00006694773,0.000055980006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007398828,0.000047082198,0.00009773622,0.00010366606,0.0005239164,0.0010400771,0.00025604924,0.0019118617,0.0000039768024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008387818,0.00006534062,0.0049002846,0.0000013617349,0.000043440155,3.848364e-7,0.054811895,0.0000069338685,0.000023658897,0.93585163,0.0038299677,0.0003812249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070409523,0.00017923678,0.020811189,0.00005690725,0.00006089862,0.0000125051465,0.0737408,0.000007775304,0.00005923894,0.31426007,0.58993435,0.00017296427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5316227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9894468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62159157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012692863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009811477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615920300","doi":"10.1177/2322005817700185","title":"The Gordian Knot: Regulatory Relationship and Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Institution; Government (linguistics); Position (finance); Engineering ethics; Public relations; Law; Public administration; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.027258427281577166,"score_gpt":0.39348029145897784,"score_spread":0.36622186417740066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615920300","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15478787,0.0007972065,0.00005949727,0.514808,0.0079643335,0.00023769865,0.0000011991225,0.000014851146,0.32132936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700964,0.000114035065,0.0008222404,0.00062841095,0.0023387568,0.000012446355,0.0000033551157,0.00001176071,0.025972608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848676,0.0003191003,0.0004670627,0.00012949361,0.00039934495,0.00019825705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695116,0.00025520113,0.0011944724,0.00040970268,0.00096324115,0.0002262311],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002201237,0.000101026,0.000115432566,0.00017416287,0.0043692933,0.0021214332,0.0004812715,0.000097379474,0.000070468355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060791275,0.00008500087,0.00006864255,0.00021049437,0.00045733977,0.0042427233,0.000021924156,0.0005976771,0.000027423532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017975506,0.00014281338,0.01418837,0.0000056037484,0.000017786211,5.978001e-7,0.0072801467,4.4685575e-7,0.00001689897,0.7514432,0.041380093,0.18550605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000864058,0.00002314641,0.25773278,0.00003887419,0.000028967039,0.000047111924,0.022445446,9.769954e-7,0.00001031171,0.007879933,0.71162677,0.00007928927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002046035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016378128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8153085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022024965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012164684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616118064","doi":"10.3138/jcs.41.3.185","title":"Ethical Imagination or Ethical Reasoning?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11955420037067496,"score_gpt":0.4975750312857974,"score_spread":0.3780208309151224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616118064","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014612237,0.00067292625,0.00014928299,0.8413748,0.0017880772,0.00006420873,0.0000016640219,0.000009575385,0.14132719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727731,0.00067908777,0.0027531974,0.019997854,0.0011814563,8.655448e-7,3.6005022e-7,0.0000052828523,0.0026088266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988125,0.00017421278,0.0003153033,0.00005487785,0.0004190193,0.0002240919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965232,0.0009952318,0.00023089277,0.000049394155,0.0018979175,0.00030334515],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060508642,0.000049717928,0.00012248935,0.000615424,0.00059772376,0.000101417114,0.000121794204,0.0002040854,0.00022861424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022463314,0.00003911062,0.000039224127,0.0010953402,0.00026387145,0.00033868893,0.0000062289205,0.0015727831,0.000016793221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042454398,0.000020270307,0.0019505412,0.0000060810335,0.0001023907,0.00009476229,0.06781047,0.0000011976996,0.000013389156,0.54066354,0.37624037,0.013054559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103192804,0.00003171075,0.0055581615,0.000024556131,0.000019586936,0.000024155994,0.04197697,5.087384e-7,0.000012475899,0.002321172,0.9498747,0.00005280095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07386319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7731179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004547474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004098991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9857709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616666987","doi":"","title":"Born in Faith, Continued in Determination: B.A. (Rocky) Jones and the Egalitarian Practice of Law in: In Search of the Ethical Lawyer: Stories from the Canadian Legal Profession","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Faith; Legal ethics; Political science; Practice of law; Legal profession; Sociology; Bad faith; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.036594047825462044,"score_gpt":0.39395181909480415,"score_spread":0.3573577712693421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616666987","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3826146,0.00037843332,0.0000041885614,0.48973155,0.0006299547,0.0008660165,0.000019492278,0.0000072611697,0.1257485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977477,0.000043246066,0.000068299356,0.0009696639,0.00011792944,0.00006102975,0.0000018996775,0.0000072895045,0.0009829111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954822,0.0032009804,0.00049915875,0.0001996519,0.00034839203,0.000269633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934443,0.005594597,0.0001956192,0.00027728835,0.00042854281,0.00005964993],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056586117,0.000100555895,0.00021251391,0.00012909403,0.00039469215,0.00009523683,0.0004365116,0.0002603135,0.00006729918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008465745,0.00005273473,0.000030377529,0.0011833522,0.0012619633,0.00075422745,0.000082292834,0.0010139004,0.000006966016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001156665,0.00011453124,0.046052463,0.000011151412,0.000006043442,0.0000017483666,0.19079885,6.178433e-7,0.00006629743,0.7593689,0.00038751733,0.0030762132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026662268,0.00002845475,0.22840844,0.0004761509,0.000018351722,0.000001774638,0.065162376,0.000056295423,0.00032937212,0.009231363,0.69343233,0.00018889578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80981916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99487793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75013757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002900684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026365712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617066494","doi":"10.3968/9482","title":"An Information Analysis of Judges’ Repetitive Discourse in Criminal Courtroom","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Retributive justice; Law; Realization (probability); Sociology; Criminal justice; Political science","score_opus":0.0395951492051804,"score_gpt":0.4363272877344943,"score_spread":0.3967321385293139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617066494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51650125,0.0000015312359,0.000023199163,0.012957224,0.00022466616,0.00008640124,0.000039183084,0.0000061030223,0.47016048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991161,0.0000029619519,0.00008043177,0.0005796384,0.00008014788,0.0000055300584,0.0000126201485,0.0000012549349,0.00012128891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901056,0.000055284185,0.0001697657,0.000117624964,0.0003703614,0.0002764131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988114,0.00003393782,0.00024186345,0.00021599166,0.0004523853,0.00024437197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017357394,0.00004305088,0.00009674865,0.00067967945,0.0025127332,0.00059778756,0.0006150505,0.000050109462,0.00032424644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001833159,0.000048310034,0.00003163628,0.0017538104,0.001630467,0.005124234,0.000012974488,0.00012762618,0.000011272888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026933708,0.000024118835,0.22269137,0.0000015688058,0.000012303016,0.0000011930915,0.114232846,0.000004387363,0.00003813518,0.6492532,0.0003557781,0.013382447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006919408,0.000008385055,0.81904316,0.0000032613923,0.00006567101,8.679385e-8,0.14083369,0.0001191992,0.000012676335,0.00040346474,0.039341763,0.0000994342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52170247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7823966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6488497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057182263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049837534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618196792","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5006","title":"COLD, HARD JUSTICE LESSONS FROM THE FLEET: INNOVATING FROM THE BOTTOM UP","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incubator; Popularity; Economic Justice; Legal service; Mentorship; Service (business); Legal research; Legal profession; Entrepreneurship; Legal practice; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law; Sociology; Marketing","score_opus":0.17588333222656177,"score_gpt":0.448297613723316,"score_spread":0.27241428149675423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618196792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2924126,0.00022018998,0.000779987,0.5595811,0.0066057052,0.0009608129,0.0003358611,0.000103695835,0.13900004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752951,0.000053889355,0.0020791006,0.014273844,0.003604857,0.00005560531,0.000018478444,0.000027443411,0.0045916764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792564,0.00029557516,0.00042572568,0.00034018283,0.00066727854,0.00034561692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99392056,0.0034733166,0.00070809235,0.0011184879,0.0006672058,0.000112334325],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001483962,0.00016177108,0.00020980576,0.000050414183,0.0036514895,0.0021799207,0.0029277252,0.00013414343,0.0010198781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01258981,0.00011671393,0.00006206765,0.00052838266,0.00046897808,0.0016982463,0.00038085313,0.0006977791,0.00029083336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001732367,0.0002565724,0.029975835,0.000054983724,0.00031538733,0.000005981302,0.1099393,0.00007101075,0.0042447806,0.3159713,0.51547194,0.023519706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037313625,0.000016483853,0.2052713,0.00013733181,0.00065574626,2.425595e-7,0.024548661,0.00006130259,0.0006814222,0.001603484,0.76638114,0.0002697317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07466863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067841657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6828825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007450403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001022563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618835669","doi":"","title":"Who Speaks for Parliament?: Hansard, the Courts and Legislative Intent","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Political science; Legislative intent; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09605725028713857,"score_gpt":0.40956364689219527,"score_spread":0.3135063966050567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618835669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00124818,0.027585698,0.00005858145,0.8127201,0.0011269068,0.002224991,0.00013357458,0.000015586196,0.15488636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5252905,0.19991928,0.0009495333,0.23156415,0.0017814799,0.0010926436,0.00013458812,0.00005616349,0.039211653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990182,0.00013264343,0.00020816096,0.00018950482,0.00014975695,0.00030174255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987481,0.00016324314,0.0002212786,0.00039680715,0.00016463612,0.00030590754],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011684927,0.00010256816,0.00017357047,0.000036935027,0.0025984244,0.00052089203,0.0003938752,0.00003683685,0.0009190171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008657836,0.00007976354,0.000057581925,0.00006352957,0.00039382922,0.0006567626,0.000021468404,0.00017236991,0.00004586375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033472552,0.00001482984,0.0028732936,0.00014110788,0.00006656708,0.0000026677242,0.0065879948,9.6805444e-8,7.773224e-7,0.0629938,0.8124395,0.11487603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009899961,0.000014948696,0.0015986576,0.0004484787,0.00006743545,0.0000016570676,0.002329006,0.0000039937313,0.0000015864803,0.0011097497,0.9942172,0.00010826035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52153283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71407235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58115596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002696651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013520913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619075263","doi":"","title":"Public-Centred Civil Justice Redesign: A Case Study of the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Status quo; Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Political science; Law; Civil litigation; Alternative dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Resolution (logic); Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07907835763609462,"score_gpt":0.3463088283110282,"score_spread":0.2672304706749336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619075263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93419296,0.00048311075,0.00022814359,0.030659424,0.0017127625,0.00058058416,0.0000067617607,0.000030655447,0.032105602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98585767,0.00040371632,0.000015768952,0.00011085294,0.00058076176,0.000010617211,8.8985803e-7,0.000010032799,0.013009683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968873,0.0007943455,0.00038014367,0.00017405662,0.0005944106,0.0011697059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781054,0.000162163,0.00082716515,0.00037958313,0.00071216794,0.00010836241],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004387272,0.000072410476,0.0001390607,0.000039992145,0.012148539,0.0043338207,0.0007213207,0.000085518266,0.0003088744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049982616,0.00008491591,0.0000827001,0.00039473313,0.00024448178,0.0012492054,0.00006502359,0.0019614084,0.0000053942854],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024749408,0.011397263,0.16566832,0.00005414404,0.0016208334,0.0006367603,0.13030945,0.00004700777,0.000231917,0.32928878,0.22490062,0.1355974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039724745,0.00064870046,0.018974897,0.0000737642,0.0005950631,0.00667603,0.7172675,0.0000777589,0.0000027849935,0.07168861,0.17956865,0.00045375578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34189433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9795896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63769525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086717703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0128032975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99669975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620467785","doi":"","title":"Undercompensating for Discrimination: An Empirical Study of General Damages Awards Issued by the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, 2000-2015","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Tribunal; Human rights; Law; Political science; Commission; Legislature; Business","score_opus":0.14797218726227307,"score_gpt":0.4972913191124273,"score_spread":0.34931913185015423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620467785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9182745,0.0000034810776,0.0001816371,0.016677087,0.00021246429,0.00045095,0.000009495838,0.000012271616,0.06417812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96880704,1.6378445e-7,0.0007101019,0.00009890485,0.0001681678,0.000023913735,0.000022943977,0.00000401631,0.030164752],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886423,0.00021246875,0.00030625932,0.00014632207,0.00033979028,0.00013091497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985768,0.00019726016,0.00036917787,0.00035273712,0.0004540058,0.000049995848],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012833292,0.000069136055,0.00013721621,0.00003823184,0.0026255322,0.00023485569,0.00045537006,0.000047929145,0.0007758377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031489143,0.000047003963,0.000035216075,0.00009331486,0.0002341735,0.0007806809,0.000032202912,0.00013557075,0.0000012410011],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004243907,0.0035063596,0.102944806,0.00001374043,0.000118810465,3.7468922e-7,0.5323031,0.00001407599,0.0007240714,0.2587249,0.09982881,0.0017785078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019716443,0.00079440296,0.35611078,0.000012510381,0.00016005035,6.5397535e-7,0.11548268,0.000121513236,0.0013068258,0.017973084,0.5057614,0.000304465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54385823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7431268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41682044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013910071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007751085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620857392","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1260","title":"Networking the Rule of Law: The Canadian Bar Association’s Abandoned Intervention in Chevron v Yaiguaje","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Intervention (counseling); Legislature; Corporate governance; Corporation; Politics; Supreme court; Sociology; Multinational corporation; Legal profession; Public administration; Management","score_opus":0.05769061674622808,"score_gpt":0.40998201729470296,"score_spread":0.35229140054847485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620857392","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16415201,0.00010666958,0.000002545739,0.543911,0.0010617888,0.000119931785,0.000005412535,0.0000026806074,0.29063797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99304104,0.000054099448,0.000008225102,0.002991066,0.0031138037,0.0000016199236,5.632075e-7,0.000003177865,0.00078641647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990314,0.0002635697,0.00027536237,0.000037311653,0.00023472265,0.00015758765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869174,0.00016524584,0.00078606483,0.00006780422,0.00024197831,0.000047191446],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027875793,0.000041496696,0.000107588174,0.0000496162,0.002722797,0.00044513904,0.00025064038,0.00008406783,0.000029006966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006092074,0.000028354621,0.00007379167,0.000085698375,0.0002504062,0.0005249397,0.00001638704,0.00034393772,0.0000016081714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076108367,0.00002407741,0.003281122,0.0000026867422,0.00002838362,4.783367e-7,0.06795409,6.884831e-7,0.000005412053,0.92442745,0.0016546209,0.0026134013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038628644,0.000014886553,0.09713208,0.000023754621,0.000024903547,0.0000011812242,0.0050435923,0.000002997897,0.00000763729,0.023796229,0.87351525,0.00005117713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8684808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87493455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037573016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009172494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621352715","doi":"10.7202/1071144ar","title":"Respect for Law: An Educational Objective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Political science","score_opus":0.13089409660850543,"score_gpt":0.45420533668860436,"score_spread":0.3233112400800989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621352715","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009687121,0.00003424712,0.0008660766,0.5945125,0.00049918966,0.00033658807,0.000027227568,0.00008421545,0.39395282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739032,0.0000058658293,0.00460983,0.017178768,0.0015647961,0.00008960435,0.000028343722,0.000007702706,0.0026118883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993523,0.00012310423,0.00010604278,0.00014764056,0.00014774021,0.0001231873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891484,0.00055441656,0.000058375746,0.000075879005,0.00027251334,0.0001239676],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040911805,0.000043319902,0.000054314667,0.000025993892,0.0005931173,0.00014490398,0.0001279769,0.00003567043,0.0019134339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027845888,0.000046429617,0.000032896074,0.00035383465,0.000079297504,0.0006822784,0.000007770468,0.00009364459,0.00016478781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001594512,0.000057169967,0.0005169775,0.000003118414,0.000009422569,5.6434807e-8,0.040377803,0.0000021873116,0.0001065409,0.9138246,0.04369336,0.0013927879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008819956,0.000035330493,0.0013784129,0.00000159174,0.000010783133,1.2003593e-7,0.010521746,0.00003254636,0.00009998848,0.026664995,0.96108925,0.00007700312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004323651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028467246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96421605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060931336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008594216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622210974","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0022","title":"Access to Civil Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Commission; Political science; Empirical research; Data collection; Empowerment; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.07082181452919714,"score_gpt":0.3445448084818621,"score_spread":0.273722993952665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622210974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002327628,0.000005454323,0.00021654385,0.0036378128,0.0016951881,0.00046000455,0.00006161428,0.00014139632,0.99375874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00021393542,0.000057260688,0.00033620934,0.0014849799,0.0007784361,0.0000021920487,0.000031187516,0.000019975689,0.9970758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987561,0.000113024864,0.00013290765,0.00031532123,0.0003937096,0.00028890878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984149,0.00028254066,0.00020875412,0.0003718635,0.0004471587,0.00027479287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003232936,0.00016799959,0.00017593113,0.0002395682,0.0010452664,0.00047511957,0.0011672527,0.0004681182,0.00056421204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028665195,0.00021296598,0.00007884035,0.00007486162,0.00021452596,0.0006291726,0.00028476788,0.0011164036,0.000016193562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001633742,0.000013642622,0.0000021047672,0.000021072277,0.000020993659,0.0000075505804,0.0038206838,0.0000010405819,0.000002208018,0.6180698,0.37551102,0.002513534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103877355,0.000010931412,0.000013021936,0.000030893712,0.00017868733,5.6949676e-7,0.0006684885,8.6886104e-7,0.0000066557845,0.00064742187,0.99808216,0.00025643568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002130993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0089600105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6225711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033869696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032846443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86845005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623314048","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v2i1.7159","title":"Teaching an Invisible Subject: How are we Educating Faculty about Copyright?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Copyright law; Public relations; Subject (documents); Political science; Higher education; Copyright Act; Action (physics); Intellectual property; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09987179628539973,"score_gpt":0.42056405526098806,"score_spread":0.32069225897558834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623314048","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3351678,0.0006741387,0.0004884913,0.4555235,0.010673097,0.00044959888,0.000012080989,0.000087863904,0.19692345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679482,0.000113564565,0.01038054,0.00322756,0.007603769,0.000019385441,0.000023914436,0.000033745968,0.0106492955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646586,0.0012241033,0.00084201695,0.00028914362,0.0007219974,0.0004568498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959572,0.0006100202,0.0015869426,0.00035185483,0.0010600874,0.00043391733],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032419453,0.0002196467,0.0003308653,0.0008672107,0.0012332273,0.0016371721,0.0008751515,0.00023333235,0.0019028239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024280378,0.00020030359,0.00010647632,0.0015464864,0.0003257147,0.009534072,0.000027925906,0.0013752424,0.0000658946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106714404,0.0021321469,0.054635227,0.00005804431,0.00005146574,0.0000047306953,0.23339768,0.0000040877067,0.00027327865,0.3107617,0.36475554,0.03381939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031538276,0.00012033569,0.025519215,0.00029709953,0.000028809513,0.000025210762,0.09298919,0.000025867717,0.00034997487,0.027036339,0.85301954,0.00027306043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019272321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018890102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63278043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040237623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009834605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623779531","doi":"10.26443/fo.v13i.250","title":"“The inconvenience of the present arrangement can only be realized by those who have to work under it”: a History of the Legal Research Collections at McGill","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fontanus","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endowment; Humanities; Library science; Classics; Political science; Art; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.11651159701679221,"score_gpt":0.3959705684239121,"score_spread":0.2794589714071199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623779531","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051567744,0.00021318907,0.000007388924,0.54045886,0.0015068215,0.001651164,0.000050179136,0.0000134144175,0.40453124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56503683,0.000039318806,0.000028122493,0.0015153751,0.000059622114,0.00019355708,9.977832e-7,0.0000059919566,0.4331202],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976068,0.00085931865,0.00027795107,0.00015997948,0.00082719326,0.00026876724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978377,0.0007574518,0.0001913863,0.0004687212,0.00065958983,0.0000851525],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013988392,0.000068556175,0.00009633569,0.000058166563,0.0020026779,0.00007034971,0.0006298956,0.000053073953,0.0005206325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012052712,0.000040680512,0.000065174216,0.0013113768,0.0006872504,0.0001690525,0.00016865873,0.00032161447,0.000011514707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002192932,0.00008299415,0.0003796967,0.0000026570121,0.000017332548,6.86382e-8,0.022979727,0.000007090304,0.0002274196,0.017758794,0.9578289,0.00069340714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011250792,0.000025069568,0.0034078988,0.000025605623,0.000009360768,5.23088e-7,0.014567288,0.000004480066,0.0003046773,0.00067802815,0.9808142,0.000050340117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21298431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23704378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53894347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001757878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020646784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625883803","doi":"","title":"The Wellness Doctrines for Law Students & Young Lawyers, by Jerome Doraisamy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.042555688381149016,"score_gpt":0.42697456658463145,"score_spread":0.3844188782034824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625883803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003396379,0.00025249275,0.00021799085,0.115350924,0.0043940786,0.000322085,0.000022189299,0.00003331697,0.87601054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830969,0.00021063902,0.00021454063,0.00095530704,0.0012038851,0.000031761578,0.0000051584393,0.000014041862,0.014267771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983513,0.00018829567,0.0003020117,0.00015257257,0.00061118056,0.00039466302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981688,0.00042566212,0.0005152033,0.00033342437,0.0003797874,0.00017708336],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025776643,0.000113214715,0.00012631044,0.000019656061,0.017797252,0.005645426,0.0013190507,0.00008659233,0.00019390589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070769363,0.00008368082,0.000093952876,0.000077896424,0.00053567044,0.0017850571,0.000061845894,0.0004990505,0.00005616911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022250975,0.000091991715,0.0011566973,0.0000024563146,0.000044381737,0.0000017575983,0.0017613465,6.35517e-7,0.00004452349,0.9639492,0.031197147,0.0017276314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044854434,0.000024365894,0.00056569313,0.000013937206,0.000027962415,0.000014124337,0.0029994855,0.0000019372542,0.00011403516,0.06513371,0.9305289,0.00012730491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121497504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34873146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009558673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023965698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626386906","doi":"","title":"I seek your wise and learned counsel, please, How I might best adapt my modest plays Unto conventions of the modern day: Or Shakespeare Goes to High School","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ScholarWorks - GVSU (Grand Valley State University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science; Law; Public relations","score_opus":0.0930340592026884,"score_gpt":0.3171866610295221,"score_spread":0.2241526018268337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626386906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8444659,0.0005199998,0.008074862,0.10287348,0.0011487812,0.0018399388,0.0005235289,0.00020390394,0.04034961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9044932,0.00037420815,0.00085550634,0.00042568965,0.00009050089,0.0000041566536,0.000028262024,0.000021256945,0.09370722],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791265,0.0006028974,0.000207814,0.00037013923,0.0005533046,0.0003531761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775934,0.00022663682,0.000224657,0.0003557859,0.0008799151,0.0005536747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008831551,0.00019133616,0.00023153517,0.000295244,0.0012372833,0.0005468436,0.00053479173,0.00015446072,0.00023371272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011044228,0.00016253818,0.00008168613,0.0017181602,0.0003302833,0.0020990123,0.00012253853,0.0006627101,0.000039966533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006371711,0.003582423,0.03916322,0.00025647183,0.0016197603,0.00023494125,0.4282856,0.015982958,0.0015035673,0.27383807,0.21081464,0.018346634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022269494,0.00013540627,0.0018431398,0.0001361453,0.0001754068,0.0000032898656,0.058242705,0.0003425394,0.000048225167,0.0030836726,0.9333725,0.00039000774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053244126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020314764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7225579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019855784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017935341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99756193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263027130","doi":"","title":"Court Government and the Collapse of Accountability in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Kingdom; History; Law; Geology; Paleontology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03785020954608008,"score_gpt":0.32078328669118633,"score_spread":0.28293307714510624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W263027130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9041068,0.00084542815,1.3223634e-7,0.09106709,0.0003659683,0.00010328351,0.000021037262,3.478244e-7,0.0034899353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969524,0.0015733253,0.000022077835,0.0013062682,0.0000667951,0.0000028368822,1.1700994e-7,0.0000015193424,0.00007466358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916106,0.00019644875,0.00023103155,0.00003803,0.00027468908,0.00009875926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982488,0.001063222,0.00019444135,0.000043147596,0.00037425035,0.00007613115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024700102,0.000032040916,0.00013457489,0.000051869138,0.0003962624,0.000087703906,0.00009973865,0.000016435723,0.000027859962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040880954,0.000022585637,0.000012685834,0.0004333759,0.00085259957,0.0001373538,0.0000124641265,0.00029620834,4.232324e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045947978,0.00006673849,0.277206,0.000046586265,0.00056195277,0.00009814136,0.13170922,0.000012671052,0.000011577391,0.3930818,0.17012458,0.026621219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016079978,0.000006380364,0.21884006,0.00004744199,0.000038335078,0.00008764044,0.19985725,0.000005135423,0.0000023005382,0.0015088922,0.5779402,0.000058339683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99981314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40781567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034905146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038060138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6751705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26321446","doi":"10.1016/j.rcl.2015.05.006","title":"In Canada: Litigating Literacy.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phi Delta Kappan","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Redress; Law; Framing (construction); Harm; Economics; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0318516915063755,"score_gpt":0.36395102854878225,"score_spread":0.33209933704240674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26321446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68851686,0.0000618906,0.00005271294,0.20075752,0.00075613,0.00013507475,0.00000716745,0.000028993036,0.109683685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99403733,0.000009166775,0.00069206476,0.004319312,0.00025072493,0.000012662352,0.0000065179474,0.0000043280743,0.0006679031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992784,0.00005660903,0.00016440569,0.00010199334,0.00020180987,0.0001967696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995556,0.00011998519,0.00005915239,0.000088915825,0.0001003751,0.00007598133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032060358,0.000045048724,0.00005665395,0.000052419717,0.00023482967,0.00010158371,0.00012322552,0.000023618128,0.00041656935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000679474,0.000049320246,0.000011211586,0.00062921783,0.000035936308,0.0007615236,0.00001081933,0.00020343735,0.00004097071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062637287,0.00013514105,0.020849094,0.000012846582,0.000011369786,0.000026395182,0.1285405,0.00037537623,0.000090690206,0.8201714,0.012073438,0.017707476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024357565,0.0000049390674,0.008340902,0.000024339759,0.0000030903018,0.0000016871595,0.012809278,0.000030501624,0.00009605583,0.015385402,0.9629192,0.00014105483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99470735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9508457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007124685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067980313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26957196","doi":"10.2174/1570162x14999160224100541","title":"MOOCs as Online Professional Development for Law Librarians","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current HIV Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Professional development; Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Law; Sociology; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.37331437437357035,"score_gpt":0.5784939364740658,"score_spread":0.20517956210049543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26957196","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12241392,0.00055239233,0.0005398737,0.5424896,0.007098499,0.0045635803,0.00007088876,0.00021411182,0.32205716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72180533,0.00013454305,0.007938714,0.0016317773,0.0028136647,0.0022827971,0.00071668666,0.00003813806,0.26263833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998216,0.00028532164,0.00019520416,0.00018551465,0.0007031963,0.00041476145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979366,0.00076858245,0.000044464447,0.00013329543,0.00093589054,0.00018113693],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013880918,0.000059202102,0.00006532728,0.00013001345,0.0015671668,0.0003663444,0.0003223252,0.00006198917,0.004097643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014529853,0.00005202359,0.000024589008,0.0005987078,0.0002458194,0.0009046525,0.000074403775,0.00055282464,0.0021115749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007356155,0.0005125184,0.00034971818,0.00002060931,0.0000058967266,9.8508636e-8,0.011470135,2.4118785e-7,0.000038560884,0.5520023,0.39316222,0.042430364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001377838,0.000011831278,0.0012664753,0.000026517275,0.0000010774504,1.298729e-7,0.006185851,0.000024984425,0.000077050674,0.0107064145,0.9814911,0.00007079104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009221349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048554788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59939146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012030048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003920947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W269690993","doi":"","title":"C.A.J. Coady, ed. , What's Wrong with Moralism? . Reviewed by","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Morality; Epistemology","score_opus":0.049515981419668335,"score_gpt":0.3616134247474528,"score_spread":0.31209744332778444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W269690993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0325195,0.0018744085,0.00039673084,0.29415476,0.0007391813,0.0004112778,0.0000028370328,0.00019589532,0.6697054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8382787,0.011247995,0.002801018,0.017323095,0.0003800345,0.000049563892,0.000033873446,0.00001483663,0.12987088],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991788,0.00011920976,0.00013667837,0.00012587996,0.00027279145,0.00016661617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993572,0.00011144327,0.00007988618,0.00013973366,0.00022141491,0.000090309484],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037812235,0.00006106512,0.000085270396,0.000029706624,0.0006467326,0.0002651984,0.00013423318,0.000041720912,0.0045076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024747584,0.000047761263,0.000019188803,0.00052005594,0.00020187852,0.0025882777,0.000008598262,0.00014955265,0.00040483352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042009788,0.00007419599,0.0012056897,0.000003264524,0.00000841445,0.0000018821324,0.0079117045,4.4587244e-7,0.00002292602,0.06923066,0.9179082,0.0036284537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087158944,0.000013710313,0.00030947258,0.000012556806,0.000006036478,0.0000035418414,0.008668824,0.0000015087315,0.000047792488,0.00008440825,0.9906764,0.00008858698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065412023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008986555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8057592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044692126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000538928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99640244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2725360110","doi":"","title":"Library Guides. Canadian Law Resources. Case law.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.03430925794777162,"score_gpt":0.3272411730694733,"score_spread":0.2929319151217017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2725360110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008443933,0.000017776385,0.0000016620879,0.19571374,0.00023341796,0.00012472573,0.0000034967175,0.00008265231,0.79537857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.846159,0.000003660499,0.00090237043,0.045842774,0.00025939988,0.000017487748,0.000005961964,0.000006825187,0.10680256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993336,0.00008648489,0.00012974469,0.00010364969,0.00011514732,0.00023136444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992539,0.00012832964,0.000034616736,0.00014525885,0.00009653855,0.00034129957],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021108512,0.00004824149,0.000044850993,0.000060839684,0.0010199375,0.00081604585,0.000142136,0.00006685388,0.052069396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014007307,0.000045191002,0.00001923101,0.00040018585,0.00018147212,0.0024411986,0.000013190956,0.0001484265,0.00220498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.1168096e-7,0.0000061843325,0.00013533849,4.269665e-7,0.0000020144903,0.000014859268,0.0043754023,1.4136049e-7,0.0000010614402,0.6482273,0.3466786,0.0005585888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030329245,0.0000028391646,0.0000988613,0.0000013087117,0.0000023066568,0.000017695846,0.009389773,0.000004317295,0.0000142288645,0.006021231,0.984346,0.000071156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97522384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.837715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059791702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008906416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2726742724","doi":"","title":"2003. 03. 032. Армстронг Х. Социальные связи и приватизация в канадском здравоохранении. Armstrong H. social cohision and provatization in Canadian health-care // Canadian J. of law and society. Calgary, 2001. Vol. 16, №9. P. 6581","year":2003,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 4, Государство и право: Реферативный журнал","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology; Social care; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.02363849231292917,"score_gpt":0.3308705982860243,"score_spread":0.3072321059730951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2726742724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2874321,0.049271204,0.0007035559,0.13644952,0.024864072,0.024248691,0.0069790916,0.0012409259,0.46881086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96244717,0.005141335,0.0034768565,0.016610954,0.0020353878,0.0005319639,0.002239809,0.00058350374,0.0069330186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97729313,0.0032208676,0.005181518,0.003819149,0.0030343593,0.0074509555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98247105,0.00095542206,0.003333604,0.0018922755,0.0053325878,0.0060150344],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008974152,0.0026558933,0.0033045327,0.0027351736,0.007156187,0.0019404847,0.0018181261,0.0030638645,0.0062916335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052456274,0.003157226,0.00068888534,0.009822485,0.0036493817,0.0044892672,0.00040429475,0.0048800437,0.00036069276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039519236,0.0017493473,0.05028746,0.0021982398,0.0010299218,0.00015649389,0.20138596,0.00012639684,0.00030302317,0.34676018,0.37131864,0.024289144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005102633,0.00081353006,0.029838176,0.0009796042,0.00047782846,0.000117345306,0.04471222,0.00068030995,0.00039429692,0.0024487807,0.91068643,0.0037488227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9621204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6750151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086833825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047110803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727110256","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law and Legal Research: General Info","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal research; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.12877513848222008,"score_gpt":0.4400756177954088,"score_spread":0.3113004793131887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727110256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030269253,0.0001641681,3.9505682e-7,0.22445564,0.0021438925,0.00022193645,0.00008133279,0.00007717786,0.7725528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004388034,0.0007184004,0.0028245226,0.03608393,0.0055096177,0.000037356644,0.00031993297,0.000035896675,0.9500823],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978255,0.00039396103,0.00030394617,0.00029762211,0.00058840355,0.0005905926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797463,0.0005840457,0.00009165362,0.00031567056,0.00041083922,0.00062316],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017027624,0.00014430964,0.00016108608,0.0005442509,0.0020156463,0.0025568823,0.0005286465,0.0006799751,0.017334323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017380635,0.00013937498,0.000038413826,0.00084815203,0.0009654729,0.0025261492,0.00008819929,0.0023618755,0.00031487763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.1246686e-7,0.0000048601187,0.000031620904,0.000004570573,0.000006005846,0.0000039900897,0.0011244863,1.7735973e-8,0.0000012648873,0.49285755,0.50548416,0.00048084217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004142929,0.000010410605,0.00007721756,0.000014690676,0.0000064780297,0.0000032098371,0.0022869087,0.0000012335348,0.0000086066,0.0057742083,0.99159336,0.00018223505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9874916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98241657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48708335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001434652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0178086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W273031924","doi":"","title":"Sticky Floors, Broken Steps, and Concrete Ceilings in Legal Careers","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas journal of women and the law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Glass ceiling; Legal profession; Quarter (Canadian coin); Practice of law; Law; Hierarchy; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.013817900444641791,"score_gpt":0.30054966195580474,"score_spread":0.2867317615111629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W273031924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92181337,0.00045139474,0.000011408161,0.045260802,0.00023250353,0.00007672893,0.0000012318172,0.0000045474644,0.03214802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99684024,0.00031792582,0.00014322404,0.001931747,0.00016911012,0.0000010806453,2.1295016e-7,0.0000032840776,0.00059316435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924326,0.00013578036,0.00021553726,0.000052744883,0.00018800053,0.00016465974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993459,0.00024108103,0.00015431111,0.00004789107,0.0001087993,0.00010202355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020962858,0.00004916961,0.00013154754,0.00005340306,0.00022464283,0.00022456609,0.00010861258,0.000034532288,0.00006399163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037224658,0.00003356173,0.000018799507,0.00018703773,0.0004918322,0.00059925934,0.000015102339,0.00030052426,0.000003124334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008832068,0.000008178534,0.0008338912,0.0000037068357,0.000020920119,0.000006926374,0.071808055,0.0000066210487,0.000019985819,0.9266158,0.0001233909,0.00046422167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005508938,0.00014546831,0.0031697378,0.000060198538,0.000034553144,0.000084819345,0.07614717,0.0000055587498,0.000053858323,0.07897844,0.83564115,0.00017008615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008094923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001049444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84763736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013539502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004010502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731985030","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199684250.013.009","title":"The Legal Profession and the Market for Lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Debt; Legal education; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Quality (philosophy); Great recession; Recession; Commercial law; Practice of law; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Business; Economics; Labour economics; Finance","score_opus":0.036221311106966754,"score_gpt":0.3172114438710916,"score_spread":0.2809901327641249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731985030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000068711715,0.000053989173,0.000051981497,0.016156169,0.00077385834,0.0009236305,0.000054310123,0.000029177269,0.98195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002658443,0.00041151728,0.00006159158,0.00020377459,0.00030568897,0.000008505962,0.000009188668,0.000009480765,0.9987244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990732,0.0002659149,0.000094240735,0.00016870073,0.00020910197,0.00018884294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977348,0.0013104433,0.0003405764,0.00033678103,0.0002195419,0.00005786841],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012287981,0.00010750223,0.00012476655,0.00003151585,0.0061536347,0.00042319627,0.00065652333,0.00019452712,0.000016059572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040204867,0.0000712109,0.000079168225,0.00000910206,0.0013454676,0.0003009258,0.00013597727,0.00045895218,2.9175774e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016588287,0.0000025221905,6.5788055e-7,0.000009312264,0.00002879642,5.7233683e-7,0.0022058047,2.2198133e-8,7.504889e-8,0.6929679,0.29970223,0.0049162013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005262328,0.000007965824,0.000006730626,0.000032878714,0.00008917011,4.5428885e-7,0.0028081432,0.000012798164,7.6526345e-7,0.0028550094,0.99356,0.000099834484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011822759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017101119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6938578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012682036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016326852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733268477","doi":"","title":"Let Law Be Law, and Let Us Critique: Teaching Law to Undergraduate Students of Criminal Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Legal education; Legal profession; Public law; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04019897328820871,"score_gpt":0.439396451223421,"score_spread":0.3991974779352123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733268477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40820202,0.00032067194,0.0012375204,0.2260708,0.0010371683,0.00026492844,0.000009012886,0.000034948658,0.36282292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891204,0.00048616546,0.00030490177,0.006952988,0.0004711315,0.0000042046845,0.0000015436576,0.0000120242685,0.0026466192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977485,0.00032031245,0.00027482523,0.00016506953,0.0005312778,0.0009600047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890196,0.00017352612,0.00030582157,0.00021056553,0.00025424623,0.0001538568],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004092366,0.000106456566,0.00014908296,0.000055671157,0.004007113,0.0009545994,0.00058316544,0.00006802063,0.000030322031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086902996,0.000105660074,0.00004495551,0.00007077681,0.0003589567,0.0013845338,0.00007395943,0.0019043732,0.0000102208105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021738475,0.00010062375,0.00032536272,0.000009702281,0.00004724698,0.0000018300964,0.0070472704,0.0000017405611,0.00011471361,0.9906908,0.00048785043,0.001151086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007573696,0.00033593387,0.0010154024,0.00007293802,0.00037983793,0.00010563479,0.05643023,0.000004501514,0.00011844799,0.3900449,0.5504155,0.00031928596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048809517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14687148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60064596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003825966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018210046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99728954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733552843","doi":"","title":"The Resignation of Robin Camp: Background and Reflections","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07062323850167589,"score_gpt":0.43197637789007304,"score_spread":0.36135313938839714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733552843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28257984,0.0028502676,0.005243414,0.4199099,0.002210516,0.00036248847,0.0000023540956,0.000037261212,0.28680396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816047,0.005078458,0.00007015261,0.000053180815,0.00028266103,0.0000028433715,3.8559665e-7,0.0000036018603,0.012904003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899113,0.00015495224,0.00014466472,0.000058529527,0.00017535313,0.0004753655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990828,0.00018756225,0.000319161,0.0001342169,0.00024274657,0.000033525892],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036956263,0.000036132962,0.00004448501,0.000042715063,0.005219386,0.00049069535,0.00022591409,0.000037986578,0.000028872812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010923082,0.000027370603,0.000022536871,0.000102533166,0.00024110197,0.0007343574,0.000013214721,0.000895553,0.0000063672537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000080365,0.000013077179,0.00035100998,4.024058e-7,0.00002080995,4.8330072e-8,0.0017605724,6.5780597e-7,0.00021822221,0.98665065,0.0005063053,0.010470194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001962111,0.00006244695,0.004513972,0.000006915589,0.000020764652,0.000024382505,0.037187997,0.0000055945957,0.00005741905,0.53497076,0.42288643,0.00006708164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031908879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049809624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69902486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029271527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042815004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735705522","doi":"","title":"Ontario student group wants fair pay mandated for those in Law Practice Program","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1407327515873532,"score_gpt":0.49900070356577086,"score_spread":0.35826795197841765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735705522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021061242,0.000017919347,0.0003423269,0.095201924,0.0011795138,0.0017187966,0.000002936996,0.00015199644,0.88032335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9333655,0.0000069944135,0.019270912,0.0047907294,0.00019419436,0.0004239546,0.00003979156,0.000009021689,0.04189885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988696,0.0001852663,0.00021558846,0.0001666706,0.00033177267,0.0002311051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885726,0.00033812912,0.00010807085,0.00012259417,0.00045097678,0.0001229459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021378405,0.00006781494,0.000085280124,0.000051105173,0.00024032977,0.00036638163,0.00017127891,0.00006868932,0.00035872494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011805632,0.000051812942,0.000021769398,0.000427933,0.00009686745,0.0016783553,0.000022921893,0.0002391448,0.00012628644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007882962,0.0018380618,0.0069096624,0.0000032127066,0.00002227774,0.0000027876488,0.11348255,0.0000015779865,0.000003291552,0.8273781,0.037169512,0.0131101515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049960864,0.00009857333,0.0022576323,0.000004745456,0.000011604357,6.4279277e-7,0.04742736,0.000005572995,0.000005358451,0.0019623449,0.94763726,0.00008931818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38605914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8419295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9123043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041133817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014128784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6180292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737854651","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v6n4p79","title":"Criminal Justice Majors’ Basic Knowledge of U.S. Constitutional Rights and Pedagogical Implications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Criminal justice; Constitution; Psychology; Economic Justice; Political science; Questionnaire; Pedagogy; Medical education; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.17276578593722275,"score_gpt":0.5146445853530096,"score_spread":0.34187879941578686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737854651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51298463,0.0008754013,0.0005825155,0.11446818,0.015755681,0.00019671409,0.000027246411,0.00001724215,0.3550924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891656,0.00008689423,0.0013289063,0.00033113494,0.0021437877,0.0000068197546,0.000009407031,0.0000037495245,0.0069236923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988797,0.00010230685,0.0004456508,0.00011571577,0.00035105972,0.0001056084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957959,0.00027530588,0.000946631,0.00016432333,0.0026918212,0.00012600675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058854965,0.00008011154,0.00012274545,0.00023040238,0.0007171069,0.00030775927,0.0005775692,0.00007497367,0.00091626804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077712664,0.0000740665,0.00006365729,0.000088657755,0.0008685724,0.0013062558,0.000041461277,0.0002469583,0.000022220082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029737996,0.0004587449,0.0058566798,0.000010257647,0.000052278818,9.0770055e-7,0.007983546,9.588e-7,0.00019024628,0.9694676,0.010558894,0.005390154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032959224,0.000031551514,0.21032894,0.00006542848,0.00017555582,0.000072041665,0.0028132263,0.0000010430623,0.00008961081,0.04439778,0.7415932,0.000102054626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068233995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008731178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9250698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015482766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025655553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738069810","doi":"10.1177/002070200305800123","title":"Review: Miscellaneous: What Went Wrong?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.017229727694777836,"score_gpt":0.3897176892652419,"score_spread":0.3724879615704641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738069810","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00612033,0.036556255,0.00039605892,0.8929062,0.0058198967,0.000091627255,0.00003570561,0.000008084255,0.058065847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9001777,0.050803073,0.00041318356,0.044817396,0.0020149706,9.881865e-7,0.000005092294,0.0000075324883,0.0017600213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961467,0.0006173966,0.00097354344,0.0001149888,0.0018431636,0.00030422208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945155,0.00019684374,0.0014315437,0.00013162257,0.0032441723,0.00048034335],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002103416,0.0001377958,0.00033495823,0.00034481008,0.00038001232,0.00085912744,0.0008076127,0.00005879053,0.0037363255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049000974,0.00012340072,0.00040590184,0.0017276682,0.000088933164,0.0009136244,0.000017736942,0.0005436224,0.000011608113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028610459,0.000113223214,0.0022611038,0.000008461488,0.0028016993,0.00026636594,0.000358412,0.000629563,0.0000035194053,0.02453017,0.9636636,0.005335312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018620187,0.000018525385,0.0004045929,0.00015965986,0.00055456045,0.00071931997,0.0021633187,0.0000044292765,0.000004509398,0.002211241,0.99345165,0.000121970974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5785288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.806218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8940574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032213952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015200681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740102883","doi":"","title":"WHAT ENSURES EFFECTIVE STATE-FUNDED LEGAL AID SYSTEM? (A guide for the reform of the current state-funded Legal Aid System in Jamaica)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Economic Justice; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.026185735280732855,"score_gpt":0.35543007856993347,"score_spread":0.3292443432892006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740102883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5047257,0.0019489717,0.003489276,0.112616695,0.025364589,0.02144329,0.000185405,0.00060419313,0.3296219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892114,0.00007940862,0.00014362714,0.00032329455,0.00023885621,0.0009941701,0.000008433559,0.000021869473,0.008978964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668926,0.0008291013,0.0008485626,0.00034863903,0.000756191,0.00052824616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959178,0.0018538564,0.00057157193,0.00054914714,0.0009924835,0.00011515456],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003093683,0.0002270308,0.0003328922,0.00014602423,0.00092891086,0.0011550818,0.0007288792,0.0000871447,0.00010026864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008507035,0.00012766838,0.00016762844,0.00102208,0.0003344857,0.0030511115,0.00009783881,0.0005449758,0.000079489684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017778005,0.00037629012,0.0017237942,0.0006135307,0.00020971312,0.0000012805853,0.027258469,0.0001857651,0.000258775,0.8697892,0.034689818,0.06471563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011723291,0.00010962628,0.011022012,0.00047581043,0.00006741421,0.0000048283623,0.1820047,0.0007582392,0.001361524,0.0012005675,0.80147624,0.00034667787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12922338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058301453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86858857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013603087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012564478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741916342","doi":"10.1177/1474022217722510","title":"Putting authentic learning on trial: Using trials as a pedagogical model for teaching in the humanities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arts and Humanities in Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Authentic learning; Pedagogy; Experiential learning; Psychology; Discipline; Mathematics education; Sociology","score_opus":0.6998002977862227,"score_gpt":0.5646528101307715,"score_spread":0.13514748765545115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741916342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84540296,0.00007334871,0.000021307937,0.016948787,0.0015161465,0.0008124333,0.0000012606583,0.000020570838,0.1352032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641718,0.000013964301,0.0002763692,0.0014992093,0.0011694211,0.00018335928,0.000007384264,0.000009112087,0.03266933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986199,0.0005113759,0.00034204338,0.00016041876,0.00018513387,0.00018109553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982138,0.001204706,0.00035088116,0.00015515421,0.00006028108,0.000015156628],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004586498,0.00008766563,0.00015478396,0.00016297975,0.0040808776,0.0019679016,0.00020014745,0.000059102847,0.00015728232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028419262,0.000071191535,0.00003956934,0.000035331443,0.00026164405,0.0008857541,0.00001817887,0.0003543299,0.0000024216563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007293638,0.00012383249,0.00018291289,0.0000076353135,0.00000283725,9.968551e-8,0.25153416,0.00003928746,0.0000024017595,0.7467127,0.00023763893,0.001083548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002298165,0.00010482233,0.0014012415,0.00012743023,0.000038492977,7.190955e-7,0.22658356,0.00080869254,0.0000012244321,0.210087,0.5583646,0.00018406205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049690544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026604303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.558127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101766775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049078185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747861587","doi":"","title":"Integrating Civil and Common Law Teaching Throughout the Curriculum: The Canadian Experience","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Law; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.06457611961266785,"score_gpt":0.4282295086886362,"score_spread":0.36365338907596834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747861587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000740492,0.0049211094,0.000018203642,0.24976279,0.00044933078,0.0002867999,0.0000119653105,0.000021352285,0.74378794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490493,0.0072721224,0.000119319455,0.04112196,0.00016953453,0.000074128686,0.0000102229515,0.000006333782,0.0021770592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986388,0.00039508042,0.0002736152,0.00014612405,0.00035920177,0.00018714108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897814,0.00040721602,0.0001620274,0.000168312,0.00019963956,0.00008467238],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001382401,0.00008869037,0.000102198785,0.00001842126,0.00239109,0.0006745617,0.0005043875,0.000022867134,0.0014757781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006398682,0.000052340813,0.000039857645,0.00018358733,0.00042633337,0.0007899769,0.000043038468,0.0004958149,0.00009912812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.7420328e-7,0.000013892866,0.0002670821,0.000009853657,0.00000941482,8.992884e-7,0.014702893,4.5887177e-7,4.7652e-7,0.9710163,0.007003758,0.0069747916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026819647,0.0000034880568,0.00008323515,0.00019848181,0.000010137006,0.0000082916085,0.0024378723,0.00010838201,7.559976e-7,0.004456032,0.99259216,0.00007432579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8000679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9384315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98558843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016588092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011734045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748555408","doi":"","title":"Foreword of UBC Special Issue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04229635508594467,"score_gpt":0.39498499934534104,"score_spread":0.3526886442593964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748555408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006171632,0.0000017997022,0.00036092623,0.13134244,0.0006949187,0.000042615204,0.0000024102135,0.000015992768,0.8613673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7213922,0.000015299647,0.000828902,0.00071682537,0.0036977134,0.0000026624725,3.5502643e-7,0.0000020216362,0.27334398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996411,0.00003409721,0.000088144145,0.000044938733,0.00011987762,0.000071822076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995772,0.0001701627,0.000045253666,0.00006204031,0.0001166096,0.00002868152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002566942,0.000019222778,0.000032851065,0.00003053169,0.00009088982,0.00001244194,0.000076451455,0.00002571752,0.046026543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006893976,0.000012326292,0.000014927631,0.00020464938,0.00009316005,0.00034248637,0.0000061497103,0.000027862725,0.0005561504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021881783,0.000019055846,0.0011026422,4.4359518e-7,0.0000019113832,4.179469e-8,0.0028611347,7.272947e-9,0.000099866906,0.6643649,0.28376484,0.04778298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053333784,0.000005766703,0.0010472318,0.0000023143543,0.0000014817938,5.3135214e-8,0.001963669,1.3127891e-7,0.00043596872,0.0053712074,0.9910945,0.000024325038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019742223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002574869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71522063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020069183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025928547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95484555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749389623","doi":"10.1097/01.naj.0000524546.50943.9e","title":"Lessons Learned from Litigation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AJN American Journal of Nursing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.24160333396390213,"score_gpt":0.523125701463162,"score_spread":0.28152236749925985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749389623","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3687607,0.000040725514,0.00120451,0.5407028,0.0014099558,0.00003044133,0.0000024573235,0.000010456672,0.08783795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99442214,0.00007590308,0.003750766,0.00044485455,0.00088313856,3.5201168e-7,0.0000010179627,0.0000050479675,0.00041678082],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991968,0.00016878977,0.00019365225,0.000064335494,0.000256348,0.00012007303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982216,0.00020501828,0.0010147056,0.00015361805,0.00030372638,0.00010133783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060709374,0.000041491563,0.000108885586,0.000068804475,0.0011237579,0.00047844506,0.00027717702,0.000021058873,0.0001801905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018728625,0.000040927538,0.00004612198,0.00013696068,0.0006444775,0.0011720929,0.0000053333974,0.00027224713,0.000019789599],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019040403,0.000075643766,0.001658055,2.3970813e-7,0.000017802256,0.0000022152008,0.036681768,0.0000032216576,0.00047467218,0.02095819,0.0032639287,0.93684524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049932743,0.00020791318,0.14003284,0.0003551141,0.000114993716,0.000015794802,0.18384403,0.000033715256,0.00048705982,0.08096524,0.5931859,0.000258046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038342036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001167793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93658715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013804805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006351215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86431515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750392139","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v12i1.3988","title":"Legal Information Innovation in Saskatchewan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Library science; Identifier; Legal research; Humanities; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09462484016722532,"score_gpt":0.4216650859719554,"score_spread":0.32704024580473007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750392139","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050837528,0.00008237973,0.000015932397,0.5422832,0.00022674642,0.00017507149,0.000002432618,0.0000038172293,0.4063729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99331015,0.0003277404,0.00018443582,0.005133353,0.000180714,0.0000046415566,0.0000079524525,0.0000020894197,0.0008489229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998414,0.00048887345,0.00046473864,0.00003457027,0.00037877692,0.00021907079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977763,0.00069571915,0.000593452,0.00013706912,0.0006015345,0.00019586796],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007266325,0.00004888591,0.00006913351,0.00083348446,0.0030063398,0.005828823,0.00030485605,0.00008685476,0.0001058846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100454865,0.000037338217,0.0000116761985,0.00069543463,0.00053649495,0.1413564,0.000029202956,0.00089858804,0.000017826293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052984095,0.0000061610713,0.003696176,0.000012041614,0.0000082681545,0.0000024580784,0.062714115,0.0000031202057,6.304488e-7,0.8999476,0.010218572,0.023337904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018538442,0.000030691266,0.012144071,0.000021981814,0.0000037141156,0.000023030252,0.10511106,0.00001824369,0.000011653539,0.0028169209,0.8795902,0.00004304182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02968341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01580794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94247264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000418265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064783446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750478892","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6351-044-8_8","title":"Canada: Canada’s Egalitarian Debate","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Political science; Crying; Media studies; Economic history; Economic growth; Public administration; Sociology; History; Economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.040891447747352476,"score_gpt":0.2939019537091974,"score_spread":0.25301050596184493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750478892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000068782783,0.000046340367,0.000001180286,0.087158844,0.005000243,0.00028200645,0.0001306229,0.000051640225,0.9073222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011936814,0.000006340567,0.000051818697,0.007764423,0.001208708,0.0000075145767,0.00009756319,0.000053682106,0.97887313],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752223,0.00008440541,0.0003966351,0.00041319916,0.0010841147,0.00049939123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972276,0.00023043045,0.0005973663,0.0007598508,0.00078214466,0.0004026148],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065792963,0.00030179397,0.0003157875,0.00011636737,0.0019871057,0.0013551723,0.0007112402,0.00037012313,0.0022289976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001125578,0.00033529435,0.00007939381,0.0000173571,0.00034581078,0.00054099056,0.000059097838,0.0011178631,0.000024417443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026005441,0.0000014683013,0.0000027910733,0.0000049293285,0.00005006453,0.000044815093,0.000955097,1.6703584e-7,2.135173e-7,0.38573337,0.60977566,0.0034288454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000910926,0.00000449505,0.000026632713,0.00003449347,0.000047451816,0.0000048322895,0.00077945617,4.818894e-7,0.0000015033253,0.0069924872,0.991619,0.000398072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38184336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002245503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17075795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751937031","doi":"","title":"Is Law an Academic Discipline","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Virtue; Legitimacy; Argument (complex analysis); Discipline; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.2228594550359763,"score_gpt":0.5607685668968105,"score_spread":0.3379091118608343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751937031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022204978,0.0000031617044,0.00003900616,0.2928291,0.00033297317,0.000037416903,0.0000014220802,0.000031360058,0.6845206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92456985,0.000014301398,0.00039430914,0.0063515427,0.00045795986,0.0000037000023,0.0000020522796,0.0000023513985,0.06820394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995839,0.000031885353,0.00007357478,0.000081867096,0.00012959608,0.000099191086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949783,0.00003833781,0.0000733573,0.00024175431,0.0000761362,0.00007260152],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045620024,0.000026871498,0.000030342177,0.000013365528,0.0022140234,0.00038377676,0.00031516983,0.000053754673,0.003586666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003474819,0.000023259512,0.000011581156,0.000049245165,0.00021259855,0.0020761944,0.000024447163,0.00018464225,0.0003535738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.840062e-7,0.000015367994,0.002201501,2.9968797e-7,0.0000013587166,7.2175865e-8,0.010285443,3.7126863e-8,0.000032377666,0.96899325,0.016588671,0.0018808364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039302256,0.000003971354,0.0074106194,0.0000012128783,0.0000025273769,1.0493932e-7,0.0037254577,0.00000869789,0.00008984069,0.020738417,0.96793497,0.000044910284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021805782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01225487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9513463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017131384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018836395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752080828","doi":"","title":"Vocational Discernment: Personal Recollections","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections Canadian Journal of Music","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discernment; Vocational education; Psychology; Philosophy; Pedagogy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07887919405590774,"score_gpt":0.3086591120516482,"score_spread":0.22977991799574046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752080828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07840023,0.00023655183,0.0009788662,0.15458465,0.010441549,0.00017527486,0.00003368311,0.000025773872,0.75512344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97546375,0.000021182088,0.00023238538,0.00095599255,0.0009923858,0.0000061521255,0.0000015240641,0.0000071587688,0.022319483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909854,0.00012120447,0.00027181554,0.000077183075,0.00022993656,0.00020133865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877477,0.0001263156,0.00018311602,0.000066951405,0.00046168454,0.00038714195],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037887145,0.000060835493,0.000074697695,0.00059018395,0.0013904162,0.00021084072,0.00015726326,0.00005525043,0.033527713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078484067,0.000065065964,0.0000959129,0.00091513497,0.00019154293,0.0007217387,0.0000029119437,0.00041209624,0.00018318114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005537036,0.000138838,0.004486596,0.0000027273124,0.00011541595,0.00001529048,0.15141226,0.00002379349,0.000031699426,0.040833227,0.7899691,0.012965548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012717032,0.000040243023,0.0032770282,0.000017020246,0.00002348178,0.00010118905,0.039563898,0.00004293654,0.0000034902903,0.00058848143,0.9561326,0.00008244459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059087966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.581258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8970635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007365744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020244177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752252557","doi":"","title":"A case for a family court in Nova Scotia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Political science; History; Engineering; Ethnology; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.06131052417941358,"score_gpt":0.36605760375782426,"score_spread":0.3047470795784107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752252557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119184196,0.000033039993,0.00017258148,0.018918715,0.00064780924,0.00041311694,0.00003600889,0.000025745952,0.86056876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984491,0.000038564955,0.0013551777,0.00080454105,0.00020913841,0.000027563849,0.0000023043015,0.000008486136,0.013063226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991469,0.00007124803,0.00027280467,0.00014368602,0.00016106591,0.00020428853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874127,0.0007487784,0.00012228586,0.0001456663,0.00017609706,0.00006591936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006913942,0.00006860822,0.00011703793,0.00007773246,0.00012323042,0.000033893466,0.00012836281,0.000078677134,0.00034812445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077436754,0.00005531071,0.000040401457,0.00017008762,0.00018213576,0.00037540752,0.000014994539,0.00008573833,0.00004540429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024153349,0.00008810117,0.0033595213,0.000012422799,0.0000096014055,0.000025585296,0.0077366997,1.9604556e-7,0.00015577974,0.95848703,0.021577861,0.008523067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045734135,0.000030520237,0.0012055342,0.000034723973,0.000011663843,0.000010804776,0.0014436345,7.471279e-7,0.00004019853,0.008910164,0.9877394,0.00011527651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068545006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.103791565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96616155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007399726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000531367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93765765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752413816","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3026379","title":"The Double Life of Law Schools","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04630884287051673,"score_gpt":0.39989212074583563,"score_spread":0.3535832778753189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752413816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040819027,0.0010560468,0.00022633627,0.4000999,0.0012297776,0.0001363887,6.840534e-7,0.000016123402,0.55641574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98581487,0.00256574,0.000024479597,0.000273432,0.0005331298,0.0000027408887,2.083275e-7,0.0000039332413,0.010781456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871427,0.000087087676,0.00016367916,0.000051866704,0.0002480119,0.0007351153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999008,0.00009697481,0.00036908803,0.00020887767,0.000251189,0.00006586043],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00397945,0.000038129598,0.000054929944,0.000019542565,0.0048780087,0.0006623171,0.00056545396,0.00003700007,0.000064061525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001180686,0.000027023292,0.000043693257,0.000065508844,0.00023295084,0.0008503385,0.000018653225,0.0017482078,0.000045444645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016162965,0.00001568391,0.00052518025,3.354758e-7,0.000028116812,6.030385e-8,0.00078476645,4.972013e-7,0.000019297007,0.9947798,0.0010116464,0.0028184177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022061363,0.00002224649,0.0005289536,0.0000038020655,0.000009128873,0.000004510052,0.009756986,7.731844e-7,0.000027035781,0.3613395,0.62804747,0.000039007817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00982186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0375532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9449959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021673291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012356796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752781273","doi":"10.14426/jacl.v1i1.1314","title":"PECUNIA NON OLET: DIRTY MONEY AS LEGAL FEES","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Anti-Corruption Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Payment; Law; Money laundering; Position (finance); Business; Representation (politics); Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.03745303285310207,"score_gpt":0.38891502025789554,"score_spread":0.35146198740479345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752781273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7660624,0.000034352932,0.00021176867,0.09352597,0.0033201363,0.000109924134,0.0000047373696,0.00006755167,0.13666318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865261,0.00028345862,0.00021290197,0.0018244006,0.0011516484,0.0000018261316,0.00000572709,0.000010822983,0.009983163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849343,0.00015957934,0.00042154745,0.00010163082,0.00060277706,0.00022103923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849707,0.00016490824,0.0004754698,0.00011483827,0.00060202327,0.00014571875],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015309455,0.0000843972,0.00015955666,0.00023871359,0.00064024277,0.00041273303,0.00023221104,0.00009543681,0.0008345825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006201031,0.000076478704,0.00010874262,0.001057333,0.00016190688,0.0021516578,0.000020637837,0.000441353,0.00084610516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069611,0.000358273,0.004454079,0.000017328584,0.00007729801,0.0000776138,0.01597423,0.0001495572,0.009836196,0.8583595,0.10543677,0.005189531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002715147,0.000074248725,0.015376508,0.000032240703,0.000025841788,0.000029838156,0.0059093195,0.000033442702,0.00037582943,0.0016296582,0.97613025,0.000111308815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034539362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004799015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8706935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009095373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069011585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753831710","doi":"10.29173/alr2448","title":"Risk Regulation for the Legal Profession","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Legal service; Law and economics; Object (grammar); Business; State (computer science); Legal profession; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.051475250521606036,"score_gpt":0.431840743153976,"score_spread":0.38036549263236996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753831710","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023634834,0.0076937526,0.0006668199,0.49787027,0.0016882863,0.0016896415,0.0000029349042,0.00003062674,0.4901213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81254286,0.030910037,0.00125784,0.04919125,0.003337665,0.0006065972,0.00003976718,0.000024659772,0.10208934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992198,0.00024176798,0.00017456351,0.000103691775,0.00013956187,0.000120621015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980523,0.0012370491,0.0001777917,0.00020735196,0.00029383678,0.000031647236],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013941319,0.000047625042,0.00007515648,0.000008320039,0.0015120242,0.00008744608,0.0001553472,0.000035970235,0.0014432186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027206286,0.000029945415,0.000046770463,0.00032421853,0.0001828547,0.0005038809,0.000011386826,0.00010768848,0.00030783526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023959044,0.000012451106,0.000044032375,0.000035735953,0.000006401288,5.504227e-9,0.0010551914,2.6457053e-8,0.0000020440625,0.87672746,0.1019228,0.020191468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004276044,0.000012184893,0.00021536915,0.00023555341,0.00005886646,2.9863463e-7,0.0001533811,0.00001531129,0.000008445015,0.0022903269,0.99692,0.000047521906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038725257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05170389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8949972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027074007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023246522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754221173","doi":"10.12927/hcpap.2017.25199","title":"Acting in the Public Interest: The Heart of Professional Regulation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"A Nudge Too Far? A Nudge at All? On Paying People to Be Healthy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"College & Association of Registered Nurses of Alberta; College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Corporate governance; Regulator; Perception; Public relations; Government regulation; Public administration; Business; Political science; Law; Psychology; Biology; Neuroscience; Finance","score_opus":0.22895652866448196,"score_gpt":0.47108665749445555,"score_spread":0.2421301288299736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754221173","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40115246,0.000012662683,0.0000138949945,0.5909946,0.0007097747,0.0005066745,0.0000052959576,0.000023656867,0.006580963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5750474,0.000013107732,0.00010238963,0.42361495,0.00005059343,0.0001116845,0.0000098867085,0.000010089987,0.0010398992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970892,0.0009895156,0.0005201217,0.00030744245,0.0005975178,0.0004961975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642545,0.0018368999,0.0005740462,0.0007578522,0.00025835147,0.00014738065],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004896493,0.00014814816,0.00020972044,0.0001531133,0.003301024,0.0004563262,0.000872511,0.00012674433,0.0003527237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053695505,0.000098636774,0.00007884857,0.00064498046,0.00014518766,0.00086526666,0.00014982576,0.00063546264,0.00011761436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015602887,0.00035888658,0.012330947,0.00001858074,0.000013927494,0.0000010212884,0.12442629,0.0000015227511,0.0001770189,0.1486716,0.7071422,0.006701989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027263947,0.00009327485,0.1074357,0.0000015319418,0.000006803555,0.0000036250876,0.015783615,0.00005712334,0.000022369213,0.0004929703,0.87571037,0.00011999347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006069052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04457565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17389493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034709016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012069216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99799657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756531106","doi":"","title":"Manitoba directory of legal information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.021819308435841615,"score_gpt":0.2871765076273733,"score_spread":0.26535719919153167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756531106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031301327,0.000023016964,0.000015568276,0.01007933,0.0005785088,0.00013886651,0.00005604302,0.000017562115,0.9577898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97837853,0.0002743426,0.00029340267,0.0006418031,0.00021566315,0.000013987073,0.000009381903,0.0000059347526,0.020166926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991782,0.00006718275,0.00028129356,0.00006088963,0.0002279429,0.00018453608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905884,0.00016716016,0.00018348178,0.00013887683,0.00025945666,0.00019216796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036579208,0.000056073528,0.000094046925,0.00046921943,0.00014206403,0.00002992736,0.00016012053,0.00006189102,0.00064830447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007885845,0.000048267153,0.00003363536,0.00038439504,0.00015358346,0.0015129991,0.0000065742247,0.00006986921,0.000060000297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055222786,0.0000129763275,0.008585826,0.000011711494,0.000012565983,6.6393494e-7,0.00430416,2.4314178e-7,0.000049789844,0.86112285,0.071239926,0.05465379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008453543,0.000008817189,0.019043256,0.00001592161,0.0000068457966,3.293635e-7,0.0010627409,1.2103675e-7,0.000061124556,0.0006866233,0.97896224,0.000067464476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8627991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9399153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9470772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016574058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002895663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7098479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757973687","doi":"","title":"Reaching the diverse public of Alberta, Canada: How law librarians helped fill a gap in legal information delivery and access to justice through an innovative and collaborative new website","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal advice; Economic Justice; Law; Legal research; Jurisdiction; Political science; Legal profession; Information overload; Public relations; Sociology","score_opus":0.11765888028579287,"score_gpt":0.35735471466452334,"score_spread":0.2396958343787305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757973687","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35318244,0.000023688679,0.00036046622,0.36756617,0.00032207606,0.00060417945,0.000040078285,0.000019331206,0.27788156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98523915,0.000018581793,0.001159359,0.012315237,0.00007000079,0.000011795911,0.000028305543,0.0000034271964,0.0011541225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989997,0.0002555441,0.00020116959,0.00011260863,0.000273309,0.00015765507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831057,0.0004395418,0.00017705497,0.000105671155,0.0008243431,0.0001428301],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005701796,0.00008171518,0.000108162305,0.00009398771,0.00038100593,0.00112042,0.00019104309,0.000051568913,0.00004306559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021456573,0.00006469507,0.000004497199,0.0020216464,0.00013397278,0.021571351,0.000088970635,0.0001872245,0.0000014092363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003413644,0.000021766491,0.0026657286,0.000006196622,0.000012813183,3.9866987e-7,0.25344872,0.0000131396655,0.000004806716,0.7029974,0.039640844,0.0011540514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032108402,0.000038360668,0.0044901576,0.000008804084,0.000012925182,8.5998454e-7,0.28451145,0.00006130265,0.00002867116,0.00053403585,0.7098872,0.00010516337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97654355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99198127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7024634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001414308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063809976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758435532","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v2i0.158","title":"Authority of Law: An Analysis of The Role of Police","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Law; Political science; Legal education; Jurisprudence; Class (philosophy); Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08380672927142097,"score_gpt":0.44393193836517947,"score_spread":0.3601252090937585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758435532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67762834,0.00046095974,0.000052172825,0.1111456,0.0011446573,0.00013016128,0.000024685765,0.000009675292,0.20940377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985278,0.00031895674,0.00019601517,0.00010625848,0.00016443574,0.0000011188491,4.285671e-7,0.0000033674748,0.00068159564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985313,0.0003298154,0.00041684313,0.00008377512,0.0004893861,0.0001489118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971213,0.00018972172,0.0013445182,0.0003319485,0.0009514014,0.000061138606],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012726304,0.0000684581,0.00028484935,0.0001141289,0.0020052458,0.00012996513,0.00057243975,0.00004279777,0.000033024764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010309198,0.000048048183,0.00019023393,0.0004940071,0.00090897497,0.00095602986,0.00008060339,0.0003304835,6.6447296e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015742156,0.00018242444,0.039007057,0.000006989321,0.001236924,1.8851377e-7,0.03299061,0.000054406788,0.0004046523,0.92450964,0.0003506075,0.0012407592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059143,0.00018924373,0.34334004,0.00008751354,0.0030961137,0.0000057645525,0.1748874,0.00021983271,0.0033692566,0.16084152,0.3130609,0.00031094396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10299359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07752319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7636681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007408494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043360633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759043714","doi":"","title":"Doing legal research in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05869408646306996,"score_gpt":0.35625075620177515,"score_spread":0.2975566697387052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759043714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03685427,0.00003608174,0.0000015584459,0.06133778,0.0004693798,0.0001500442,0.000022879247,0.0000060211823,0.901122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592546,0.00020569973,0.00020882137,0.0005820159,0.00022811942,0.000020230154,0.0000019555112,0.0000082976,0.039490223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841446,0.0002502563,0.00024176334,0.00014742403,0.0004517223,0.0004943613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857503,0.0006043847,0.000057244288,0.0001748746,0.00022604202,0.00036240113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011926003,0.000057214227,0.000096758136,0.0006773078,0.00028251737,0.00004172901,0.00026163238,0.000053331816,0.00080484804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075484114,0.000050838164,0.000015689046,0.0010755308,0.00014292242,0.00045556668,0.000012446331,0.00023333207,0.000032085594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005175356,0.000011792807,0.03417305,0.000007053378,0.0000061177443,0.00003325617,0.00307561,9.0689383e-7,0.000020730125,0.78179485,0.11895723,0.06191421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088594286,0.000004883238,0.011935446,0.000028658593,0.0000012382721,5.69678e-7,0.0021697648,1.7796265e-7,0.00000992775,0.0008566457,0.9848289,0.00007523256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92240036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017508978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04983016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9555564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759049322","doi":"10.1177/1541931213601601","title":"Cross-Border Testifying Tips: U.S. Experts in Canada and Canadian Experts in the U.S.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Advantage Forensics (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Expert witness; Expert opinion; Witness; Session (web analytics); Public relations; Political science; Law; Psychology; Business; Advertising; Medicine","score_opus":0.03659912006657081,"score_gpt":0.3597258214825919,"score_spread":0.3231267014160211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759049322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98473144,0.00007938637,3.5065174e-8,0.0056175934,0.00017279996,0.00015196494,0.000009444728,0.0000038543985,0.009233467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989665,0.00007910416,0.000052498934,0.00060184806,0.000086679225,0.000010768273,8.328186e-7,0.0000072696475,0.0001944788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991508,0.000015692784,0.00023262565,0.00017348603,0.00014353318,0.00028382504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926764,0.00016487956,0.00026206076,0.00009024462,0.00013493854,0.0000802596],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009213909,0.00010215467,0.00012517153,0.000031072737,0.0025210145,0.00060883356,0.00038026916,0.000072677765,0.000016426196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001001818,0.00007422707,0.00003166902,0.000115049115,0.00031971297,0.0008486758,0.00008414489,0.00024125077,6.528055e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018236257,0.000008627226,0.8305944,0.000012130902,0.000004707283,7.915823e-8,0.16561343,0.000002028752,0.000057776524,0.001949084,0.0013859652,0.0003699287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012698401,0.000004372519,0.6846927,0.00005699037,0.0000040750647,7.870572e-7,0.2829659,0.000023640627,0.000053061318,0.00023892263,0.03170666,0.00012591992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14590174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037096036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010130906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760226389","doi":"10.29173/alr793","title":"Trinity Western University Law: The Boundary and Ethos of the Legal Community","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bombardier (Canada); Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Framing (construction); Legal profession; Law; Legal realism; Sociology; Virtue; Boundary (topology); Political science; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09106277014716607,"score_gpt":0.4005203509608735,"score_spread":0.30945758081370744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760226389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041399788,0.0018031598,0.0000010454887,0.26373312,0.0002715885,0.00034660418,0.000005198059,0.0000055667365,0.69243395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97980297,0.004618662,0.000010486108,0.0080987895,0.00003614108,0.0000017369405,0.0000013075374,0.000002451454,0.0074274885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984017,0.0012234842,0.00011284311,0.000056622048,0.00012505327,0.00008027298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980325,0.0009433321,0.00025066498,0.0006336234,0.00010686014,0.00003298251],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001608689,0.000046990655,0.00011184106,0.0000037660748,0.0050146976,0.00018078623,0.0006911565,0.000032585045,0.00010271145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012595025,0.00002892246,0.000048276255,0.000096215066,0.0012760914,0.0006381016,0.00014883876,0.00040845855,0.000013315852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017992545,0.000032253585,0.0027765103,0.00008801347,0.000011031576,9.3896304e-8,0.0038633428,6.837121e-9,7.130676e-7,0.98989785,0.0017576761,0.0015707255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052732168,0.000004456366,0.011357343,0.00019428416,0.000046898414,0.0000011540053,0.0006880932,6.4358396e-8,0.0000029368093,0.0006599314,0.98695517,0.000036967416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5385655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48133576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002089808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027530367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761011433","doi":"","title":"Ontario. Ministry of the Attorney General","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03256073962577753,"score_gpt":0.3070939120640022,"score_spread":0.27453317243822467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761011433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3029146,0.00003953719,2.3784057e-7,0.024192808,0.001320786,0.000111669004,0.00004492423,0.0000043657897,0.6713711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95573914,0.00040389012,0.00029734112,0.0004107817,0.0002767946,0.000009489538,0.000005009443,0.0000058255127,0.04285173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991515,0.00006406657,0.00021836186,0.0001124266,0.0002337161,0.00021987369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872303,0.000054207794,0.0003268747,0.0005069459,0.00020505369,0.00018391473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030945192,0.000072452545,0.00011079645,0.0004016433,0.0010831241,0.00009441104,0.00068778,0.0000996757,0.00069784216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005082929,0.0000618025,0.000110167406,0.0007814117,0.0010668166,0.00032940265,0.000025874535,0.00015799353,0.0000062869653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036522538,0.000028311135,0.62642777,0.0000072301705,0.00003142127,8.560111e-7,0.0102299275,2.289608e-7,0.000021470665,0.24763185,0.11413897,0.0014783028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004370452,0.000005514645,0.32635602,0.00000671913,0.000012078975,2.2012718e-7,0.0007825231,6.218303e-8,0.000020088446,0.0004647556,0.6722572,0.00005113115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99152815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6528246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006245543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037855352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8330624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761140052","doi":"","title":"Law Society of Upper Canada. Library","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013771247791605557,"score_gpt":0.24777564961875229,"score_spread":0.23400440182714674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761140052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015572981,0.00027313983,0.0000018249603,0.14502117,0.0007188037,0.00014872487,0.00033671682,0.000023792838,0.83790284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633661,0.009999031,0.0014705402,0.0048338133,0.0003742673,0.000017532242,0.000022206887,0.000021151645,0.01989538],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989537,0.000073540374,0.00027018553,0.00013277489,0.00027555256,0.00029422584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998944,0.00023580874,0.00015046957,0.00019744955,0.00016067902,0.0003116186],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019426833,0.00008523924,0.0001318484,0.00035053253,0.00026625372,0.00002574367,0.00027044467,0.000096808144,0.0014590197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011739264,0.00006972798,0.00010038753,0.0025800695,0.00069750857,0.00069066946,0.000013290852,0.00008330873,0.0000048418597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020393825,0.000011594139,0.035416614,0.00000765146,0.000024713216,3.8197865e-7,0.0013088849,3.3998145e-8,0.000024587636,0.44534308,0.5164173,0.0014430967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008173941,0.000008683639,0.012793398,0.000018706927,0.000010585066,2.064966e-7,0.0020853328,5.1185868e-8,0.00010858284,0.0012205677,0.9835696,0.00010250435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94779307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056219265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006869488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761199428","doi":"","title":"Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biography | US Enciclopedia of law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Continuing education; Legal education; Law; Public administration; Medicine; Medical education","score_opus":0.01508946184815249,"score_gpt":0.3004024101810271,"score_spread":0.2853129483328746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761199428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76371276,0.00033536582,0.00006451499,0.0044994894,0.0012070514,0.00027779397,0.0001078247,0.000058057456,0.22973716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99026716,0.0006163352,0.0022396895,0.0004450639,0.00029892242,0.000021336922,0.00000667709,0.000007945248,0.006096856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988816,0.00010168046,0.00033852816,0.00016594345,0.0003107796,0.00020147339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985859,0.00021413651,0.00031685625,0.00016669297,0.0006284383,0.000087980006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006751389,0.000053679923,0.00013642691,0.00005258242,0.00017358082,0.0001392635,0.00019128132,0.00009715435,0.000495416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019063326,0.00006823751,0.00018119632,0.0008534442,0.00066550326,0.000842441,0.00001787714,0.00008286652,0.00000579248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011012994,0.00073386496,0.2679398,0.00006256182,0.00010117088,4.883821e-7,0.009391241,6.723859e-8,0.0050468645,0.2126823,0.40762946,0.09640116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016619345,0.000025209114,0.03514844,0.000085084044,0.000022559794,0.0000010477179,0.0019739051,1.1328154e-7,0.00018614803,0.0010134138,0.96127415,0.000103720784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37609422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12579688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5536447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027371738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007254898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8901551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762177797","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association continuing education seminars.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Continuing education; Political science; Medical education; Medicine; Geography; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013434147220158028,"score_gpt":0.28918419414000046,"score_spread":0.27575004691984245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762177797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025768936,0.0000516248,0.00001526399,0.01765102,0.00096746214,0.00015169874,0.0000153084,0.000048286453,0.9553304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79910946,0.00027688473,0.0003768152,0.001013973,0.000592235,0.000006593165,0.00000962261,0.00001713945,0.19859727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998607,0.00042364962,0.00028363275,0.00015799141,0.00026757625,0.00026018912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986911,0.00030591735,0.0002775746,0.00017335589,0.00035352606,0.0001985562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013775345,0.00008062292,0.0000962025,0.00010193058,0.00029151767,0.00008450353,0.0002094881,0.000054677625,0.0006460547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016192751,0.000071962575,0.000040440667,0.00014744679,0.00007552679,0.00071417814,0.000016062831,0.000118411146,0.0003804169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003036785,0.000051215156,0.02161264,0.000004979023,0.000012948002,0.0000015156726,0.011835623,1.1057447e-7,0.00012691952,0.79460555,0.07114287,0.10060261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008928764,0.000009690082,0.008435684,0.0000643424,0.0000143534335,4.462514e-7,0.0011218969,7.401277e-8,0.000026379459,0.001149707,0.98898077,0.00010738718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24387544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18328454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91783786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055842695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011366135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83161837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762267370","doi":"","title":"A bibliography of Canadian legal materials = Une bibliographie de documentation juridique canadienne","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Political science; Library science; Bibliography; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0187868311826421,"score_gpt":0.28120635141511624,"score_spread":0.26241952023247417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762267370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18768738,0.0009903368,0.000013406301,0.16924623,0.0035807525,0.0006455189,0.0032402403,0.000025156009,0.634571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82079655,0.14039584,0.0012615294,0.0021398838,0.000858559,0.00010199203,0.00009195805,0.000066107474,0.034287598],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965667,0.00046297515,0.00092331663,0.00038015534,0.00036271775,0.0013041298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592215,0.00034957947,0.0005816053,0.0004201705,0.00064703135,0.0020794375],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014688417,0.00029698652,0.0004226151,0.14449173,0.0004568207,0.00018736227,0.0005182701,0.00037690287,0.0053730938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003598472,0.00029869337,0.00017732958,0.12076905,0.00094824587,0.0019327175,0.00001587818,0.00023123296,0.000050816234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014726516,0.00004346548,0.013577456,0.000067718895,0.00012818942,0.000025262716,0.0025762653,0.0000012253886,0.0008207271,0.48189998,0.496739,0.00410599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031703126,0.00008172895,0.03466471,0.00017865212,0.000115877374,0.000009779181,0.0009859279,1.7603836e-7,0.00070521166,0.003999019,0.9585994,0.00034252755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99993944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99995166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63310915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034615202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014880817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763301137","doi":"","title":"Canadian law symposia index.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.018480243560130866,"score_gpt":0.28444786375427333,"score_spread":0.26596762019414244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763301137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00489305,0.00004405969,0.000004137076,0.06964082,0.00072200346,0.00019804234,0.00008995802,0.000026628602,0.9243813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90368146,0.00018870717,0.00011905899,0.0040041967,0.00036958244,0.000023270775,0.000008041009,0.00001609066,0.091589585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986346,0.00011079529,0.0002628926,0.00018519045,0.0002607744,0.00054576993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980474,0.0001880032,0.00010213567,0.00026119204,0.00023755159,0.0011636842],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045504465,0.000105887004,0.00013089833,0.0006485103,0.0005721158,0.00007925857,0.0003280379,0.00015186939,0.0023775364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043122677,0.000094590156,0.00004630319,0.0006154596,0.00024843053,0.00060938136,0.0000080403215,0.00014934111,0.000221779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014785403,0.0000058661667,0.009193322,0.0000022367738,0.000009976307,0.0000051595784,0.00203245,1.5955362e-7,0.000007941295,0.9396678,0.044050045,0.0050235265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010865402,0.000009650677,0.0064137955,0.000018849285,0.000009009363,0.0000012108029,0.0004955201,1.6739475e-7,0.000009466545,0.0042050458,0.98857987,0.00014874234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94452983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008018032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012295016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763815793","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association. Ontario Branch","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biography | US Enciclopedia of law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Association (psychology); Geography; Meteorology; Psychology","score_opus":0.019982669675281662,"score_gpt":0.2885741739376665,"score_spread":0.2685915042623848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763815793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16553026,0.0000636512,0.0000135620885,0.04930184,0.001274652,0.00018413662,0.00006136069,0.000045491943,0.78352505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98445183,0.00009950602,0.000321563,0.0015748597,0.00027403253,0.000015718044,0.0000063559837,0.000007132451,0.0132489875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871695,0.00012250913,0.000247934,0.00016301629,0.00037477684,0.0003748025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985961,0.00031728606,0.00019206604,0.00018220018,0.00043835415,0.00027403623],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008977631,0.00008231394,0.00011347899,0.0002526018,0.00043091635,0.000083453255,0.00022293744,0.000141899,0.0034294012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047589737,0.000068209345,0.00010556037,0.00079857395,0.00015479625,0.00067485607,0.000009363835,0.00012893109,0.0001515746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030167564,0.000038127382,0.5842752,0.0000018066966,0.0000371309,5.7259024e-7,0.006281595,5.5295388e-8,0.0000784487,0.37006983,0.038115248,0.0010990056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012697425,0.00001316579,0.100447305,0.00000882194,0.000016136202,1.6599184e-7,0.0001739967,1.617189e-8,0.00008039533,0.0022235203,0.89680797,0.00010151162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85869277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007363692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034610785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763899602","doi":"10.1093/pch/15.suppl_a.12a","title":"Tipping the Scales: Canada's First Medical-Legal Partnership","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paediatrics & Child Health","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023085422547620214,"score_gpt":0.3461315099025685,"score_spread":0.32304608735494833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763899602","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068165204,0.00031889512,0.000036994534,0.8745484,0.0027489634,0.00024867244,0.000008080752,0.000058446913,0.11521507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416636,0.0006095285,0.00013854651,0.052053552,0.0046180966,0.000020361638,0.000015125824,0.000010829455,0.0008703598],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976997,0.00025581455,0.00034072134,0.00019077303,0.0010220706,0.00049095333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976027,0.001218282,0.00023517071,0.00026753437,0.00017550222,0.0005008279],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037369372,0.00009294036,0.00011781676,0.00006786703,0.0031551335,0.0001910967,0.00048589244,0.00011531407,0.00084195094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063551585,0.00007271057,0.00003810765,0.0010831944,0.00017827179,0.00024273626,0.000035118308,0.0014734511,0.000053585907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029982114,0.00007818781,0.023853712,0.0000250312,0.000008757282,0.0000023780822,0.012299312,0.0000023463115,8.9603496e-8,0.4141288,0.54040164,0.009196741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000893013,0.000006024437,0.016334804,0.000006303246,0.000004372458,0.0000034504449,0.0023983738,0.000019459358,2.824314e-7,0.00028752096,0.9807626,0.00008753347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85081327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93484706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002306343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018309576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763959024","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Geography; Psychology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.013849189390868799,"score_gpt":0.26834572320452066,"score_spread":0.25449653381365184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763959024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016204221,0.00009449651,0.000002606807,0.2094624,0.0012238312,0.00017590556,0.00018713989,0.000031208278,0.7726182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94455826,0.004762885,0.0003173178,0.0019604024,0.00053910713,0.000029249572,0.00001928638,0.00001671713,0.047796793],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858636,0.00014272731,0.00025405514,0.00016513695,0.00031183226,0.00053989346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814564,0.0002779711,0.00016489935,0.00019175373,0.00041478686,0.0008049776],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007420811,0.00009587322,0.00012081302,0.0025720254,0.00054760464,0.00007353811,0.00026151296,0.0001911542,0.0026655223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016090331,0.00008506151,0.00008022302,0.0034014508,0.00017871098,0.0006065838,0.0000055190585,0.000115504714,0.00019438096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018319555,0.00001231776,0.25645402,0.0000029163161,0.00003674911,0.0000021418368,0.0028926053,6.881977e-8,0.000017898104,0.29009154,0.44227824,0.00820966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008855128,0.000010142217,0.051280394,0.000011085865,0.000014445479,2.1816977e-7,0.0010856461,4.8892527e-8,0.000008855195,0.0014103702,0.94596213,0.00012809694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.928354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075795816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061678668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764021189","doi":"","title":"University of Alberta. Legal Resource Centre","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biography | US Enciclopedia of law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Business; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0156365521395618,"score_gpt":0.2680728755047601,"score_spread":0.25243632336519833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764021189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20491096,0.000055415618,0.00002409693,0.02107811,0.00024399582,0.00011635977,0.00002869112,0.000026030275,0.77351636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921064,0.00013447007,0.00040190478,0.00018468371,0.00008976997,2.6389222e-7,0.0000033850858,0.0000040474233,0.0070751095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991892,0.00013634663,0.00014820152,0.00012728285,0.00022901825,0.00016993092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896747,0.00036660954,0.00018221413,0.00017326564,0.00021926367,0.00009120056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003376227,0.00005721923,0.00009788557,0.00012502976,0.00019515876,0.000015234759,0.00021820361,0.00007108575,0.00084889284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020396881,0.000048650563,0.00010149152,0.00077613565,0.00061523507,0.0004519463,0.000021689651,0.000061759034,0.000024564377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036878962,0.0001489721,0.05079087,0.000009010784,0.00003922463,0.0000013044826,0.01143049,2.2752161e-7,0.0005759492,0.906414,0.028144155,0.0024089222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001748407,0.000016790109,0.0052389707,0.000016963491,0.000019564794,1.9591053e-7,0.0026963337,1.1543343e-7,0.00032776597,0.0002764632,0.99116206,0.00006995464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091732986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032416854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9630179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020724847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002855646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764021245","doi":"","title":"McGill University publications ; Series 16. Law.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03730927672712027,"score_gpt":0.29049258786748944,"score_spread":0.2531833111403692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764021245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001363784,0.000007736363,0.000053848627,0.02874602,0.00025541225,0.00010736223,0.000102400525,0.00012479982,0.96923864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5347156,0.00028084836,0.0006055495,0.00091274385,0.00021242622,0.000001354216,0.000009670491,0.000015690834,0.4632461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989094,0.00037634303,0.00018386538,0.00016569986,0.00019263785,0.00017202071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900824,0.00021584997,0.00016077884,0.0002561455,0.00024763716,0.000111359324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054736366,0.00007281866,0.0000823818,0.000061020954,0.00068856025,0.000032119322,0.00031822166,0.0000319857,0.00079443987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034596113,0.000063168285,0.000043270196,0.0002232348,0.0004221309,0.0015225013,0.000056544715,0.000095999094,0.00025896265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051646575,0.000040935727,0.00013316057,0.000002365963,0.000008220322,0.0000013913767,0.0009262961,4.933812e-8,0.000047514794,0.9793792,0.01643048,0.0030252552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118311786,0.000014439413,0.00087567075,0.000010291637,0.000012149728,0.0000011049168,0.0006724111,1.554915e-8,0.000047009537,0.004163594,0.9939895,0.00009545196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009152893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011030351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9775591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012234386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016942901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765075077","doi":"10.29173/alr345","title":"Regulation and the Legal Profession","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Closing (real estate); Salient; Law; Legal profession; Political science; Wish; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.047323590499521985,"score_gpt":0.3853597546560687,"score_spread":0.3380361641565467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765075077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014514835,0.009815936,0.000006295957,0.4426216,0.00022996699,0.00044420102,1.5846544e-7,0.000012625474,0.5454178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88000137,0.046125762,0.000108612636,0.026211584,0.00020574752,0.00006630568,0.0000072660673,0.0000053063627,0.04726807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991909,0.00036489728,0.0001459969,0.00007840148,0.00014096624,0.00007879415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913275,0.00053484406,0.000091862814,0.00012469638,0.000084539904,0.000031317497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077378756,0.000039385497,0.000088577624,0.0000073341726,0.0009635405,0.000039043374,0.00007624441,0.00002595464,0.000526242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001018749,0.000023932105,0.00002444612,0.0002542266,0.0003454195,0.00051806396,0.000012539983,0.00011670687,0.000102751634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023667287,0.000008139655,0.00006736872,0.000032180254,0.00000258481,9.526969e-8,0.0022045716,1.704663e-8,7.9487137e-7,0.973185,0.022520738,0.0019761662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010184925,0.0000020442599,0.0004535181,0.00016837794,0.000015931371,0.0000057313728,0.00010212283,0.0000018686802,0.0000014421922,0.0010915444,0.99801916,0.000036428704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037617847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008887066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9754984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013882264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017759013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765188031","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3184","title":"The Shifting Frontiers of Law: Access to Justice and Underemployment in the Legal Profession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Economic Justice; Underemployment; Work (physics); Legal service; Practice of law; Legislature; Law; Political science; Legal research; Legal ethics; Legal realism; Public relations; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Unemployment; Engineering; Economic growth","score_opus":0.10992780347808831,"score_gpt":0.45555795241220215,"score_spread":0.3456301489341138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765188031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017124884,0.00011641677,0.00022256271,0.30922467,0.001312579,0.00019511559,0.0000010696067,0.000004699587,0.671798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966791,0.00009545549,0.00046524528,0.002021667,0.00028680215,0.0000068677714,2.3442688e-7,0.0000040209757,0.00044057518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988459,0.00034702095,0.00021343151,0.000077475925,0.00033474684,0.00018142498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999007,0.0002980522,0.00030945553,0.00018069506,0.00013763625,0.00006715145],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028865417,0.00005191132,0.00006949548,0.000024443123,0.0060163923,0.002112462,0.0007008911,0.000039249015,0.00001559602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085489586,0.000030493826,0.000020516001,0.00008210023,0.00024748975,0.0014040695,0.00007211397,0.00049320655,0.0000022905197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016001986,0.00003309523,0.0016815957,0.0000036121046,0.0000069584366,0.0000017369572,0.012100949,0.000004540495,0.000013779884,0.9792657,0.004530216,0.0023418067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050644315,0.00005822372,0.029162478,0.00012402331,0.0000848963,0.00001937315,0.0908021,0.000029406388,0.00010853323,0.12323708,0.755691,0.00017644699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09703507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3947196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97955424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053174386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002593086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765332678","doi":"","title":"Closed Shops: Opening Canada’s Legal Profession to Foreign-educated Lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.06088439717625059,"score_gpt":0.4343394299676561,"score_spread":0.3734550327914055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765332678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07163259,0.0000018464308,0.00004031069,0.24547689,0.0013483588,0.00030988106,0.0000017522565,0.000033756183,0.6811546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87531185,0.0000015420209,0.00105147,0.0048527936,0.0002618754,0.000032361004,0.000005874429,0.0000066804187,0.11847553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989971,0.00008420989,0.00015788016,0.00016692356,0.00032626535,0.00026765515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900824,0.00009151261,0.0001310435,0.00031023056,0.00026238,0.00019659435],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005711642,0.000070723705,0.0000811074,0.000047559384,0.0031331386,0.0007138914,0.00048442272,0.000053825366,0.0018736842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019343303,0.000063910724,0.000017593668,0.0001720584,0.00006965318,0.0012041387,0.00005814034,0.00020768197,0.00008478332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003040258,0.000048877784,0.004311649,0.000003198124,0.000011246636,0.0000030072445,0.010405837,0.0000018552341,0.000205898,0.50148153,0.47548598,0.008010521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020889423,0.000007852072,0.013572888,0.000012588887,0.0000049229006,3.8778245e-7,0.035489816,0.000005780934,0.00020687783,0.0002620997,0.95010924,0.000118627955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9743883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9813407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8036793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025487258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009332054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765455907","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2017.15740abstract","title":"The Illusion of Innovation at Canadian Law Firms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Law; Commercial law; Resistance (ecology); Illusion; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.05840745842487627,"score_gpt":0.3767125350782692,"score_spread":0.3183050766533929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765455907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11867438,0.00001702935,0.0000016763765,0.15949239,0.00015410576,0.00025249345,0.000001714519,0.000011359261,0.72139484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824007,0.00018448714,0.00017426185,0.001325716,0.00008279453,0.000014555836,0.0000014460356,0.000004394938,0.015811628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991265,0.000008660692,0.00027189197,0.00010567921,0.00031410676,0.00017318656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990147,0.000043619486,0.0005631434,0.0000755529,0.0002598193,0.000043163433],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015812791,0.0000506536,0.00006329923,0.00011674407,0.0026807964,0.00016402821,0.0005647489,0.000070377835,0.0000983976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056855293,0.00004205446,0.000016448703,0.00040683328,0.00042372989,0.0009412938,0.00010749221,0.00014269564,0.00001724913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005192812,0.000008294065,0.0012535527,0.000018092993,0.0000143644,4.6052335e-8,0.0021285252,1.1042035e-7,0.0000857418,0.96321994,0.025322692,0.007943467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008311355,0.0000057657444,0.023591831,0.00002066342,0.000012417662,1.2170793e-7,0.0026330731,0.0000034128234,0.00039608928,0.011963799,0.9612412,0.000048517628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071635224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017350756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9512561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001133665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008078676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765588717","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017r-0012","title":"The definitive article","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Statute; Jurisdiction; Institution; Criminal jurisdiction; Criminal code; Criminal procedure; Sociology","score_opus":0.03692326805195515,"score_gpt":0.3321777794202439,"score_spread":0.29525451136828873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765588717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012912059,0.000082807135,0.00008205839,0.037117027,0.0003734079,0.00002546737,0.000001185761,0.0000046116556,0.9494014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99457973,0.0003303173,0.00034890018,0.000081832186,0.000107763306,1.3385615e-8,8.7447404e-8,9.245423e-7,0.0045504454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962705,0.000080744496,0.00004506468,0.000029781426,0.00013195314,0.000085407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992934,0.00012054948,0.00018468926,0.000105760664,0.00023938052,0.000056205747],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005388833,0.000018970606,0.000029938083,0.000002871229,0.008910856,0.0002490132,0.00032499628,0.000020432833,0.0010718673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000348635,0.000016670905,0.000030134235,0.000008629094,0.00046409955,0.0013249757,0.000023483477,0.00012139267,0.000020569054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014614402,0.000019332876,0.00075199007,2.1731151e-7,0.000013904816,0.0000021068827,0.013810148,2.829661e-7,0.000012196879,0.9731984,0.005306138,0.006870631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001223498,0.000009595626,0.011675894,0.000003400812,0.000008941213,0.0000016716851,0.053558633,0.0000022924005,0.000011308525,0.0033404953,0.9312413,0.000024132292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22984788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55185914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98166764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011214807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023122744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765613774","doi":"","title":"Away from the Library","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Library science; Law library; World Wide Web; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.028858480997189222,"score_gpt":0.3569756296922953,"score_spread":0.32811714869510605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765613774","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05721059,0.0007926042,0.00026743222,0.6420185,0.0011794141,0.00007155108,0.000002809789,0.000031278534,0.29842582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672557,0.0027103082,0.00005881432,0.0016401827,0.0022033616,0.0000021214507,0.0000021009002,0.0000065297895,0.026120845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875635,0.00015329233,0.00010472143,0.000068516805,0.00019352103,0.00072358316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999271,0.00019802617,0.0002080562,0.00022595683,0.000049270995,0.00004772016],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014651235,0.000043135326,0.00004391728,0.000017151891,0.0041518435,0.0012538686,0.0007276025,0.00004054336,0.0008869418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088144874,0.000029627428,0.00004082221,0.00007443036,0.00014575484,0.0018614267,0.000028740222,0.0018404915,0.00016376247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004852381,0.000016217555,0.008533819,7.341572e-8,0.000027422406,3.4463815e-7,0.002791381,1.5705638e-7,0.0000066673833,0.955347,0.012852043,0.020420048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006558249,0.0000072713156,0.0062989253,0.0000022286488,0.0000069138164,0.000003414106,0.008726987,8.546911e-7,0.0000049385276,0.36067873,0.6241701,0.000034034532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066556237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012508814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91004515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014646481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009188641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765618201","doi":"","title":"Towards a new Canada: a research study prepared for the Canadian Bar Foundation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Bar (unit); Political science; Geography; Law; Meteorology","score_opus":0.11934160004128153,"score_gpt":0.40114983176004687,"score_spread":0.28180823171876535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765618201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072040055,0.000054550477,0.000022382581,0.22316656,0.0010962641,0.0020874252,0.00011445648,0.000015660056,0.7662387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8969661,0.00007449579,0.00016972459,0.00096076744,0.00066743704,0.0002220148,0.00001048851,0.000016927372,0.10091206],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792266,0.0002754807,0.000296618,0.00022804058,0.0006441146,0.00063307077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968257,0.000969096,0.00009820866,0.00035593295,0.00084125344,0.0009097881],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022401046,0.00009653774,0.00012507515,0.0005064871,0.001842916,0.00017003356,0.0005116456,0.00008218001,0.0011022434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045677964,0.000070820686,0.00003499176,0.00085833843,0.00018527631,0.00036622895,0.000013913558,0.00018585134,0.000023789904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001538147,0.000022796314,0.0051866574,0.0000046523683,0.000052393407,0.0000034881105,0.01826585,0.0000012653435,0.00000185901,0.29712445,0.6096622,0.069659024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022490433,0.000041493775,0.01870692,0.000010994652,0.000018552108,3.6458135e-7,0.0061225984,0.0000015321419,0.0000020557447,0.0019507477,0.97281677,0.00010309284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99999547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8897621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025295631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15348735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766068022","doi":"","title":"Canadian bar journal.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.023277272298617403,"score_gpt":0.29376104982113793,"score_spread":0.2704837775225205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766068022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054811323,0.000062342704,0.0000050307603,0.13310848,0.0010691544,0.00011743113,0.000047453934,0.000012969331,0.860096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75596774,0.0011009761,0.00047523767,0.0038728162,0.0010580234,0.000012914038,0.0000048435436,0.000021375672,0.23748606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869144,0.00013324873,0.00027592047,0.0001255807,0.00026170386,0.0005121354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771017,0.0001833075,0.00012925918,0.00018798687,0.00034118132,0.0014480903],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075515825,0.00008711233,0.000116475676,0.0008834415,0.00069808285,0.000105373234,0.00032872683,0.00011259566,0.0058595208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001340103,0.000073133735,0.000051673604,0.0005208639,0.00014142373,0.00064266485,0.0000054260427,0.00019499855,0.00029199684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019591519,0.000008388707,0.011708957,0.000002471878,0.000018896037,0.000018123876,0.004552806,2.1482518e-7,0.0000099864,0.5372286,0.4098325,0.036617104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097923796,0.000010336924,0.008809084,0.000018113571,0.000009498003,0.000005143214,0.0008529426,7.044e-8,0.000004022244,0.003506217,0.9865694,0.00011726137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99561423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99968153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7504866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008722185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020383986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99504924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766161557","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3188","title":"Tension and Reconciliation in Canadian Contract Law Casebooks","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto","funders":"Foundation for Research, Science and Technology","keywords":"Casebook; Allegiance; Law; Jurisprudence; Legal realism; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Legal profession; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06166480620072193,"score_gpt":0.37499230456749283,"score_spread":0.3133274983667709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766161557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022226995,0.000049904185,0.0000047809685,0.058634568,0.0006408871,0.000085791515,0.0000039870374,0.0000068267227,0.9183463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99631125,0.00006365438,0.00020001693,0.002237504,0.00030481323,0.0000024186986,0.0000018206549,0.0000049047576,0.0008736164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991796,0.00013321913,0.00018032061,0.00009389708,0.00016036091,0.00025259797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990555,0.0000982597,0.00020866854,0.00012748182,0.00021231767,0.00029775535],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015601943,0.000055002158,0.00008060804,0.000059847065,0.003609963,0.00106567,0.00014175875,0.00008884053,0.00030091862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083783607,0.00005433471,0.000018891185,0.000036353216,0.00018632908,0.0013349126,0.000008867462,0.00047536156,0.000024062532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051342254,0.000012237047,0.0064505534,0.0000010183925,0.0000042637735,0.000029726554,0.0027062139,8.487264e-7,0.00004530714,0.98579985,0.0004871103,0.004457731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057251303,0.000025006588,0.03619195,0.000050496365,0.000014363847,0.00011911831,0.0021184392,0.00007382748,0.000041592608,0.06761808,0.89299804,0.00017656268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97408426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025137886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001035087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766541327","doi":"","title":"One man's opposition to individualism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management today/Management Today","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Individualism; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03909466322105639,"score_gpt":0.3330916831059343,"score_spread":0.2939970198848779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766541327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006600495,0.000028928016,0.0044353344,0.16730581,0.001219547,0.0029151964,0.0000067464575,0.00042220156,0.8170657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7537891,0.0003056857,0.017175198,0.031267535,0.0006293644,0.0016851285,0.00013407365,0.000058514077,0.1949554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664783,0.00029990287,0.000519739,0.0006203304,0.0011470056,0.0007651818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850756,0.00009134087,0.00019658488,0.000668698,0.00021192216,0.0003239172],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013066252,0.0002614381,0.0002205834,0.0007347716,0.0010996821,0.0012460492,0.0008220848,0.000104383966,0.007258589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007229164,0.00030623234,0.000093448994,0.0017283668,0.00010886071,0.001815659,0.0004215197,0.00027468477,0.009402255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072243192,0.00034289353,0.00019501608,0.00005698888,0.00022318712,0.000007312365,0.0045099217,0.000030482377,0.000014277065,0.5749063,0.32256103,0.09714536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041536245,0.00004204186,0.024296967,0.00006851205,0.00014450627,2.406434e-7,0.009733285,0.000013758954,0.000024049981,0.010234857,0.95461106,0.00041538058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028352274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003559598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7471886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034425018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045299337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766691981","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3193","title":"Breakdown: The Inside Story of the Rise and Fall of Heenan Blaikie by Norman Bacal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Business; Corporate law; Big business; Market economy; Finance; Economics; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.028263170078823986,"score_gpt":0.3375230194862566,"score_spread":0.3092598494074326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766691981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088936545,0.0003818794,0.00002184758,0.09779689,0.0006561326,0.000114466086,0.000013975728,0.0000052930122,0.812073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978321,0.00012739011,0.00008350709,0.0005519093,0.0001985134,0.0000014433159,2.542083e-7,0.00000477695,0.0012001044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998852,0.00040397543,0.000211468,0.00006798576,0.00032913723,0.00013541002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998623,0.00022995603,0.00058979617,0.0002708064,0.00022058586,0.00006582318],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017702492,0.000058789265,0.00009545098,0.000017991388,0.0033781654,0.00023573669,0.00054030854,0.00005797643,0.00011998281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007015745,0.000034553406,0.0000535932,0.00006820023,0.00094734225,0.0006526659,0.000062750994,0.00069120823,0.000004198501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020858739,0.00013268292,0.01615721,0.000008872635,0.00005168247,0.0000010624087,0.01602748,0.0000031285304,0.0006367003,0.9288323,0.030930726,0.0071973256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032657202,0.00003074887,0.034061614,0.000036717873,0.00004308931,0.000026934284,0.0057106377,0.000008627106,0.00037714752,0.014903289,0.9443857,0.00008888804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08896318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17802666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.913929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031242475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003517572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767126759","doi":"","title":"Legal Education Society of Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.014554113429219043,"score_gpt":0.28544090404952577,"score_spread":0.27088679062030674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767126759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03589568,0.00018160534,0.00000899277,0.08885243,0.0010933058,0.00019412846,0.00004452901,0.000014419908,0.8737149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95036095,0.0064104204,0.0014843018,0.0011073181,0.00041836002,0.000029345532,0.000015170227,0.000012872835,0.04016125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906224,0.0000737242,0.00027407598,0.00013550045,0.00021627363,0.00023821263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874216,0.00025040575,0.00019121189,0.00020181724,0.0003707848,0.00024362358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003160071,0.00007918439,0.00011671411,0.0008441104,0.0002218977,0.000027246673,0.00022499649,0.00010749019,0.00081774115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042563528,0.000066434484,0.00012560643,0.002877438,0.0005737178,0.00060654455,0.00000817503,0.00007278275,0.000017971208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003258698,0.000059020047,0.028573465,0.000012237035,0.000029662859,6.9942026e-8,0.005918619,3.9294598e-8,0.00011525709,0.5780798,0.37000638,0.017202178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073986754,0.000014634883,0.0112388395,0.000023804256,0.0000149646585,3.1863357e-7,0.003535067,6.71814e-8,0.000062830695,0.0011458955,0.98379624,0.00009334938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92896295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9500291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9144653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006110489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048607597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89536923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768977335","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.12911000","title":"Modulating the Depth of Scrutiny in Judicial Review: Scope, Grounds, Intensity, Context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Home Office; University of Cambridge; McGill University","keywords":"Scrutiny; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Intensity (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Physics; Geography; Optics","score_opus":0.12879879954872597,"score_gpt":0.4039025690202341,"score_spread":0.2751037694715081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768977335","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015590541,0.0014377087,0.00020645394,0.53808326,0.00029647056,0.0004023953,0.0000010647204,0.00003207485,0.44395003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561725,0.00059534283,0.00022238275,0.042479537,0.00017113007,0.000005640089,0.0000018523119,0.0000030067881,0.00034856188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991383,0.00017374479,0.000274053,0.00009505886,0.00020998834,0.00010886902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924046,0.00022718612,0.00013887012,0.000083391744,0.00026907466,0.000041033858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009610184,0.000042792,0.00012069301,0.000023403183,0.00018849823,0.0000478689,0.00018487734,0.000027648111,0.00057527574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044023874,0.00003158388,0.000027742602,0.000979051,0.00013304519,0.0003265287,0.000038828577,0.0002174702,0.000048898626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025994048,0.00010910979,0.021574888,0.000105658255,0.000020995518,0.0000012662133,0.054179784,0.0000073320234,0.00018063275,0.6164157,0.24754027,0.05983837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003067146,0.000043574142,0.023679208,0.00040845817,0.000029281846,9.680732e-7,0.057433583,0.00024944157,0.00016683858,0.0022943153,0.9151944,0.00019321457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022542814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015679134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025869758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038335597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9839662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770221322","doi":"","title":"Law Society of British Columbia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.016949149760183357,"score_gpt":0.2625923323770801,"score_spread":0.24564318261689672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770221322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069506384,0.000285203,0.0000055363967,0.026020322,0.00078634743,0.00023008138,0.0005713553,0.000035253033,0.9025595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9508706,0.013617708,0.0015075697,0.0014718272,0.0003009205,0.000023545728,0.00001221213,0.000015553613,0.032180086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989988,0.000072358445,0.000272379,0.00013959326,0.00024152016,0.00027535539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988943,0.00017797244,0.00016072032,0.00017089407,0.00034348422,0.00025265806],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039559754,0.000051769755,0.00013227994,0.000192174,0.0002963408,0.00007768519,0.00022697235,0.000117032556,0.001389958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017053401,0.00006832725,0.00013536087,0.0025089972,0.001153128,0.00045733957,0.0000100587995,0.00007588208,0.000009441727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012440463,0.000035803037,0.051186513,0.000013111879,0.000038322924,7.932645e-7,0.001990587,1.9945881e-8,0.000054367294,0.108889185,0.8269815,0.010808542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011223964,0.000015375732,0.025744077,0.000030306039,0.000012756035,5.932852e-7,0.0019775976,3.1891258e-8,0.0000068979152,0.00217335,0.9698305,0.000096272335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99270684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99926746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88136417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043178876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012231106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771049386","doi":"10.32396/usurj.v4i1.208","title":"Defying the Law of the Land: The Lawyer's Role in Civil Disobedience in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Law; Political science; Charter; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.05109549803766935,"score_gpt":0.3363507936708601,"score_spread":0.2852552956331908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771049386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5880607,0.00007089418,0.000014317617,0.36145473,0.0002200279,0.00019448796,0.0000067200726,0.0000019373479,0.049976233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986802,0.00023180243,0.000019827568,0.00008899375,0.000043317912,2.496567e-7,2.3062668e-7,0.0000027604215,0.00093264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974167,0.0010838715,0.0001670737,0.000093858835,0.0009202888,0.00031825952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980632,0.00088187977,0.0002875662,0.00033362675,0.00036199126,0.000071740076],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004576393,0.000051813113,0.00010028483,0.00007437647,0.0034588075,0.00017012523,0.0016331044,0.000034733635,0.00005821743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008308774,0.000032461303,0.00004554356,0.00051743264,0.0013474796,0.00057689176,0.00019711789,0.0012847573,0.0000016928581],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082835446,0.00015828839,0.69131476,0.000018600624,0.000052005857,0.000031897685,0.21666484,0.0003648197,0.0001658986,0.083060145,0.003683523,0.0044023856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004996886,0.000016073665,0.23061042,0.0001283666,0.000009089096,0.0000062875256,0.6655524,0.000095455995,0.00007686102,0.03451682,0.06839865,0.00008993221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99964935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46070436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055712915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0104138125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99783856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771157014","doi":"","title":"Clinical and Experiential Learning in Canadian Law Schools: Current Perspectives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Experiential learning; Curriculum; Experiential education; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Medicine","score_opus":0.05597736251240538,"score_gpt":0.3791980533069322,"score_spread":0.3232206907945268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771157014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9399739,0.00017736842,0.000008438272,0.00927185,0.0004670445,0.00013834031,0.0000058425244,0.000030767867,0.04992646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730814,0.00010878123,0.0003386362,0.0001375971,0.0002707159,3.7853627e-7,0.00000567578,0.000006878138,0.0018231745],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829894,0.00060236326,0.00016907656,0.00031175718,0.0002648352,0.000353009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884266,0.00013004763,0.00012873017,0.00015119741,0.0003559691,0.0003913944],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019246717,0.00008937402,0.000155273,0.00028828075,0.0016073511,0.000106648535,0.00027390878,0.000165158,0.0014409246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011547823,0.00012058021,0.00005935879,0.0006442442,0.0012274857,0.0015398196,0.00007826871,0.0009100622,0.00014600492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006168211,0.000097815326,0.78511596,0.000005204968,0.00001758894,0.0000047200388,0.10491475,5.396869e-7,0.000036897396,0.10578228,0.0004955517,0.003467043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046655803,0.000052756226,0.30035418,0.00003124302,0.000013882156,9.951929e-7,0.12706548,0.000007814952,0.000010613743,0.0005546212,0.57129735,0.0001444951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34307116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8022912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5708018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025879918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013954571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771168711","doi":"","title":"Law Reform Commission of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025196262303403983,"score_gpt":0.30030910762818436,"score_spread":0.27511284532478036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771168711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012967704,0.00007567648,3.0847852e-7,0.04027584,0.0008672851,0.00011794922,0.00008472461,0.000007377828,0.94560313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907045,0.00061409455,0.0002374452,0.00039826074,0.00014017586,0.000006552646,0.000009571081,0.000006687657,0.007882754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999046,0.000049710816,0.0002458449,0.00010325581,0.0002953693,0.00025976426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857426,0.000065368426,0.00031216018,0.00040979605,0.00029451176,0.0003438966],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038062545,0.00007368884,0.00013374307,0.00048313604,0.001365175,0.000066011984,0.00049138616,0.00008206261,0.000353749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004417399,0.00007243798,0.00005020132,0.00079233444,0.0007136662,0.00045855096,0.00001794662,0.0001252513,0.0000017209835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044689396,0.000016962249,0.014672742,0.0000129345935,0.00001862346,0.000001992106,0.0023719037,1.4516846e-7,0.000011367871,0.88335794,0.09825906,0.0012718295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006628293,0.00001042743,0.032868523,0.000015386127,0.000009306639,2.3193103e-7,0.0027074963,1.9631202e-7,0.000051123585,0.0010158317,0.96317065,0.000084537365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99988353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013782954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052189287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771611331","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5012","title":"ENHANCING THE LEGAL PROFESSION’S CAPACITY FOR INNOVATION: THE PROMISE OF REFLECTIVE PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH FOR INCREASING ACCESS TO JUSTICE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Enabling; Economic Justice; Sociology; Public relations; Action (physics); Action research; Legal profession; Reflective practice; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.38929909219707365,"score_gpt":0.5793227361091744,"score_spread":0.19002364391210075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771611331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5501914,0.00003399226,0.008320116,0.3889066,0.0019564815,0.0073282607,0.000048839956,0.000037097358,0.043177236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859534,0.000017521892,0.008390393,0.00227399,0.0012350554,0.0007440899,0.0000032057194,0.000020855883,0.0013614988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975153,0.0006918592,0.00048571842,0.0003180594,0.0006427413,0.00034628154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98564607,0.007853247,0.00082432374,0.0005391753,0.0050482103,0.0000889773],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011030297,0.0001186663,0.00018970252,0.00026181148,0.0043957,0.0014710539,0.0012580036,0.00011564795,0.00002435169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09919323,0.00008664851,0.000034396267,0.0010931448,0.00041987255,0.004469878,0.00032852494,0.0004967735,0.000003320246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007868199,0.00091479725,0.0013013055,0.0027266762,0.000331345,0.0000012334409,0.19199252,0.00013914822,0.068169855,0.6192103,0.06717081,0.040173788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011745531,0.00043781902,0.033160936,0.0006458924,0.0010353308,0.000005630073,0.12728254,0.00014055164,0.049293693,0.00564379,0.7807324,0.0004468713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009516326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034788402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7135616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016711978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016044573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771776238","doi":"","title":"Canadian Law Information Council","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Information governance; Information system","score_opus":0.027517769853713858,"score_gpt":0.25686033577029693,"score_spread":0.22934256591658309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771776238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036596663,0.00006923577,0.0000048346337,0.080896646,0.0009621674,0.00019207978,0.0002418488,0.00003200365,0.9139415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98253673,0.0028998444,0.00034961055,0.0053298394,0.00029578994,0.00003480343,0.000030395915,0.00001072592,0.008512255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865055,0.00007338978,0.00029101234,0.00010628714,0.00043201548,0.00044672366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997908,0.00013237864,0.00012949736,0.0002114702,0.00085751945,0.00076112174],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071558903,0.00009700341,0.00010574746,0.0016166867,0.0006206496,0.00010961283,0.00026707156,0.00014292229,0.0013702995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000806313,0.00008328795,0.00006212189,0.0029963588,0.00047319502,0.0019014839,0.0000058708906,0.000098959645,0.00020961935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021799997,0.0000051579477,0.005882897,0.000003506402,0.00001305973,8.035965e-7,0.0045101997,8.487785e-8,0.0000034758036,0.78355134,0.19955485,0.0064724362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010996966,0.000012048587,0.0041028745,0.000013025126,0.000009797973,5.6241805e-7,0.0018791311,8.3386695e-8,0.0000054484353,0.0021083627,0.99162483,0.00013387727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99894977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97887707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073549105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014072899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771900612","doi":"","title":"British Columbia. Office of Legislative Counsel.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biography | US Enciclopedia of law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.03762762614914859,"score_gpt":0.3421431484946045,"score_spread":0.30451552234545587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771900612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27948102,0.00015710505,0.000010784722,0.0013968548,0.0007263217,0.00020163656,0.00007282911,0.000026556881,0.71792686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541974,0.0005138231,0.00078569714,0.00024340446,0.00020884983,0.000012847366,0.000009660648,0.000007462032,0.0027984914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987876,0.000111012465,0.00031024683,0.00017266645,0.00040798789,0.00021049802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979466,0.00022760978,0.00062378304,0.00036939036,0.0007404539,0.00009215429],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008289591,0.000060845632,0.00017371702,0.000064237036,0.0008226913,0.0004954346,0.00045994754,0.00010121611,0.0011451053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007202824,0.00009284353,0.00012297968,0.0004421831,0.0015043657,0.0010085256,0.00002838662,0.00014654228,0.000007844798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037239013,0.00076357275,0.46952206,0.000064800144,0.00019941205,0.0000075726066,0.023089582,6.66383e-7,0.00041794978,0.36076912,0.13757733,0.0075506982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018297072,0.0000371641,0.14160223,0.000029412839,0.00002835241,7.5964505e-7,0.0008341701,3.6116003e-7,0.000057588055,0.0013092257,0.8558099,0.000107821186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6931827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52690554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71823263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015719263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000517963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W277316432","doi":"","title":"The Legal Profession's Rule against Vouching for Clients: Advocacy and the Manner That Is the Man Himself","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexive pronoun; Law; Legal profession; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029615537775921498,"score_gpt":0.34568980406126765,"score_spread":0.31607426628534613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W277316432","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25730821,0.001260675,0.000067141424,0.5784368,0.003663865,0.0015829649,0.000013348918,0.00008768741,0.1575793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9470958,0.00019327672,0.00018409891,0.024328602,0.0012391692,0.00026094756,0.0000072590997,0.000015753825,0.026675092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822277,0.0005563527,0.00022232694,0.00016765374,0.00037931078,0.00045160495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759287,0.0015715339,0.00020693654,0.00034787436,0.00014608006,0.00013469027],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036966093,0.00012120825,0.000106837775,0.000021139478,0.0061540827,0.0009261471,0.00047591608,0.00008237698,0.0001581143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012045092,0.00005724143,0.00008043332,0.00025786945,0.0005994781,0.0015717549,0.00008690745,0.0005391748,0.00011957687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004251032,0.000058521007,0.0019619174,0.000005894452,0.000033335553,9.810795e-8,0.027040303,5.4373555e-7,0.000011976979,0.8937074,0.07343281,0.0037047076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004223446,0.000006154263,0.0017497564,0.000015946494,0.00003111518,8.9483405e-7,0.03573317,0.000016416741,0.00004922362,0.005317417,0.9565581,0.000099429264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038223737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018390481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88838995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006336072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003363679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773284514","doi":"","title":"British Columbia. Ministry of Attorney General.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02537539139168143,"score_gpt":0.3028022861278623,"score_spread":0.2774268947361809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773284514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3160168,0.00014421389,4.5715436e-7,0.008427968,0.0009886773,0.00013957697,0.00016000184,0.000012477759,0.6741098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94671166,0.004875677,0.0008527071,0.00039939623,0.0004842783,0.000019527008,0.00002791439,0.000013209235,0.04661562],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894726,0.00006639336,0.00029408257,0.00016034642,0.0002500764,0.00028182814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849224,0.00007131047,0.0003663957,0.0004058798,0.00034721845,0.00031697683],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038626714,0.00006340087,0.00016334596,0.0004098693,0.0009018181,0.0004360867,0.00053700904,0.00013583554,0.00237876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090311514,0.00010496049,0.000098720724,0.000999354,0.0011550676,0.00051360985,0.000019956826,0.00012742297,0.0000064481105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019112329,0.000045312816,0.38268566,0.00001896604,0.00003693126,0.0000060008015,0.0017372572,1.0174949e-7,0.000018185681,0.028420879,0.5795411,0.0074876957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007527152,0.000011958882,0.24501689,0.000015761538,0.000014444072,8.9453715e-7,0.0010142,1.3594166e-7,0.0000048630604,0.0005028362,0.7532533,0.00008946977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99449617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99895996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63069487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030095094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018681649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773833023","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Foundation.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Foundation (evidence); Geology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029805595098598106,"score_gpt":0.32028748656830236,"score_spread":0.29048189146970427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773833023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01235074,0.00007520125,0.0000017590354,0.12160663,0.001604684,0.00020202303,0.000071507144,0.000020306845,0.86406714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977133,0.0026945574,0.00064997096,0.0013197489,0.0005490824,0.000026682626,0.00004235936,0.000015003999,0.017569616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879384,0.00007427254,0.00023660938,0.00018047489,0.00024581363,0.00046901577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793917,0.00007909834,0.00021241145,0.00050856435,0.00037049584,0.0008902553],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005383755,0.00010436807,0.00012629235,0.0021804257,0.003004632,0.00044739363,0.0006489553,0.00013893316,0.0026593292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001298417,0.00011914739,0.00007896821,0.0012947439,0.0006709448,0.0010740136,0.000012619898,0.00017724605,0.0001770889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002093871,0.000014183635,0.12841488,0.0000058182936,0.00003177346,0.0000051936795,0.0044049006,3.3113537e-7,0.0000024840353,0.67657125,0.18012904,0.010418045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067454646,0.00000851116,0.10282622,0.0000074808245,0.000013882228,4.4787205e-7,0.0017464722,4.324337e-7,0.0000022834515,0.0020012942,0.89319324,0.00013230085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99919504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96478224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019373167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774161793","doi":"","title":"Ontario Law Reform Commission","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Political science; Law reform","score_opus":0.040034209006459,"score_gpt":0.3211548533897665,"score_spread":0.2811206443833075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774161793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012619605,0.00004985586,6.1816274e-7,0.04066975,0.0010837457,0.00013966151,0.000023981986,0.000018263641,0.9453945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413143,0.0009044761,0.00057558273,0.0007466103,0.0002827003,0.00001399957,0.00001723585,0.000009242193,0.05613588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990564,0.000048012178,0.00021400255,0.00013955327,0.00024254492,0.00029948985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986286,0.000044053875,0.00022666923,0.00048028157,0.00021441812,0.0004059452],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004371575,0.00008895206,0.0001220655,0.0007148046,0.0024195432,0.00025056518,0.00053785497,0.0001265705,0.0013249028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023953935,0.00008771043,0.000077138124,0.0006778402,0.0008504123,0.00091188925,0.000022317561,0.00021767653,0.000039275477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046938962,0.000024565445,0.03670321,0.000004280187,0.000016382848,0.0000025029406,0.010282974,3.5592702e-8,0.0000036699173,0.8990884,0.051338404,0.002530916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008280852,0.000014440166,0.06619182,0.000013136344,0.000011909923,3.956887e-7,0.0018875243,6.786933e-8,0.000007915168,0.0022555448,0.9294251,0.0001092918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99917066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92869467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023855308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023142085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774264718","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5011","title":"READING LAW AND IMAGINING JUSTICE IN THE WAHKOHTOWIN CLASSROOM","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Injustice; Sociology; Indigenous; Law; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Reading (process); Class (philosophy); Political science","score_opus":0.09807585211070377,"score_gpt":0.44257968607187576,"score_spread":0.344503833961172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774264718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05346076,0.000038739385,0.00011074615,0.08195611,0.0007652549,0.00031838316,0.0000047293074,0.000022224705,0.86332303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918619,0.00003113832,0.0007672114,0.005803192,0.0005121978,0.000018583833,0.0000011061791,0.000008565338,0.00099615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890596,0.00015504603,0.00022110654,0.00018290759,0.0003088958,0.000226091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846923,0.0007094511,0.0002148608,0.0003743587,0.00015786683,0.000074230746],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015720887,0.00008016891,0.00011867901,0.00009661628,0.0011145088,0.0011626936,0.00090439577,0.000059453654,0.00010478363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033383362,0.0000697891,0.00001963472,0.0002332048,0.00029791714,0.002070215,0.00012524045,0.00031409846,0.000032372638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036505087,0.000092100454,0.006292642,0.00010323297,0.000013772223,0.000007962221,0.06857538,0.000015853482,0.00023707311,0.91369665,0.007487348,0.0034414565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005407029,0.000045541623,0.1004791,0.00020303717,0.00039344368,0.000004427905,0.07479253,0.00013070402,0.00020861278,0.004372808,0.8184804,0.00034871156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015412908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027033023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9384011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003702157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023184394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775009932","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association. Council","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biography | US Enciclopedia of law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Association (psychology); Political science; Geography; Psychology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.04254611569307873,"score_gpt":0.2979418958035783,"score_spread":0.25539578011049957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775009932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03652207,0.00013903221,0.000011526688,0.06868115,0.0011984156,0.00016541366,0.00011363058,0.00005630333,0.8931125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989446,0.0003374406,0.0003590448,0.0020000662,0.0003524988,0.00001714421,0.0000039767538,0.000007729624,0.0074761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845076,0.00013406815,0.00023497468,0.00015234797,0.0006679918,0.00035988085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781764,0.00040499563,0.0001948964,0.00017848607,0.0011364758,0.00026753626],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016977482,0.00007686142,0.000104059254,0.0001643669,0.00042307368,0.00007797905,0.00021865862,0.0001340644,0.0016987063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001582113,0.000062197694,0.00009285688,0.00091275235,0.00018621229,0.0006243914,0.000008629295,0.0000951836,0.00018173002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035646754,0.000044011653,0.19155553,0.000002923286,0.000042566062,9.381677e-7,0.0041487752,6.931959e-8,0.00012843452,0.6801993,0.122631826,0.0012420132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012735308,0.000012906204,0.015446778,0.000008657493,0.000016486894,1.6021323e-7,0.0003898524,6.556181e-8,0.000069272224,0.0018535196,0.9819729,0.00010209896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7929705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83559555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95292395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009662469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052046753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775176152","doi":"","title":"CanLII: Canadian Legal Information Institute","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.020433465560810157,"score_gpt":0.2797283325352385,"score_spread":0.25929486697442833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775176152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00798981,0.000014664554,0.000015714775,0.07404555,0.001299203,0.00022048852,0.00014839334,0.000026729378,0.91623944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.937955,0.00023993528,0.00032674937,0.0044286116,0.000436971,0.000032433276,0.000044719844,0.0000104170085,0.05652515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879235,0.000064660366,0.000313172,0.000109075416,0.00026315995,0.00045760933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983421,0.00008039675,0.00013167286,0.00020705276,0.00031702832,0.0009217273],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042867014,0.000096775366,0.00011188656,0.0010324077,0.0005336578,0.00013051362,0.00027228217,0.00012499809,0.0012172726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010396607,0.00008700612,0.00003804121,0.0006941341,0.00022292696,0.0035252306,0.000007207756,0.0001392646,0.0002953374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021365634,0.0000043203954,0.0034030816,0.0000040520094,0.000010148046,0.000003547779,0.0036569214,7.846203e-7,0.000002985423,0.83990824,0.11998123,0.03302254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011912452,0.000008788435,0.008726899,0.000016060156,0.000008154207,0.0000015723044,0.0006074599,3.3271343e-7,0.0000060165953,0.0007439622,0.98962635,0.00013526533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99911857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9299652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078363717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021550402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775333733","doi":"","title":"Canadian cases in the philosophy of law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04781008127696588,"score_gpt":0.31461487081770145,"score_spread":0.26680478954073555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775333733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018296326,0.00004628081,2.9274744e-7,0.09144086,0.00022920646,0.0001836729,0.00009913628,0.0000046462674,0.8896996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901831,0.00012608043,0.000052889904,0.0030887604,0.0001909638,0.00001791526,0.000004372889,0.000006525224,0.006329351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896634,0.00016803601,0.00024915402,0.000107000305,0.00021247432,0.00029698716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877757,0.00047913106,0.00009927275,0.00021671988,0.00013566267,0.00029164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061831315,0.00006816508,0.00010800157,0.00048390997,0.00022573206,0.000025168527,0.00032837907,0.000076044154,0.0006551634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007062843,0.000048865273,0.00003463118,0.0005659365,0.0002684847,0.00032068836,0.000004448277,0.000110768306,0.000022252587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016130593,0.000009901657,0.0037078138,0.0000036084655,0.000004178311,0.000012995041,0.00586545,1.3134361e-7,0.000003684787,0.978632,0.009731366,0.0020272692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079817415,0.000013778471,0.0050057913,0.00002247369,0.000005965088,0.0000022813283,0.0010451353,4.51178e-8,0.000007745315,0.012006085,0.98173904,0.000071844814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99911004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9720077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026698603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005769345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775375763","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5010","title":"COLLABORATIVE POLICY-MAKING, LAW STUDENTS, AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE: THE REWARDS OF DESTABILIZING INSTITUTIONAL PATTERNS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social justice; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Public defender; Law; Public relations; Law and economics; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.09752159562412278,"score_gpt":0.4991703045752187,"score_spread":0.40164870895109595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775375763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.700761,0.00006835144,0.00063939637,0.09024498,0.0012651953,0.0013597542,0.000160193,0.000036797384,0.20546429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944136,0.00004629382,0.0005020968,0.0039658006,0.000619561,0.00005016957,0.000002346787,0.00001096101,0.0003891456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982988,0.00017116602,0.0003450899,0.00024681314,0.00069199497,0.0002461381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975304,0.00050919247,0.00045459592,0.00045998575,0.00090074743,0.00014505176],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010864722,0.0001222319,0.00019298945,0.0001647345,0.0017484743,0.0015323418,0.0017871576,0.00007795484,0.0001448336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060370835,0.000105453575,0.000029550807,0.00056473206,0.00057883526,0.0023068204,0.0006209519,0.00021869954,0.000012366642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019883963,0.00037810527,0.08688786,0.00042049756,0.00012748418,0.0000045909674,0.08027225,0.00039439384,0.00038174287,0.8206417,0.0068617105,0.0034308229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005652948,0.000113642556,0.6424399,0.0004727206,0.0005468391,0.0000021004316,0.03143817,0.000016381957,0.0010279764,0.0015386993,0.32143646,0.00040181482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015966611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0095296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.819103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011778664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014760162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775639172","doi":"","title":"C.L.E.S.N.S. index: index to Continuing Legal Education Society of Nova Scotia publications to December 1993","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Index (typography); Nova (rocket); Political science; Geography; Engineering; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02292982789363606,"score_gpt":0.31716247510549045,"score_spread":0.2942326472118544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775639172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13032322,0.000028158523,0.00045747522,0.13789132,0.0010894401,0.00073416403,0.0000904265,0.00004054183,0.72934526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355967,0.000037833044,0.0024318236,0.0035246448,0.00038164214,0.000050738447,0.000013831257,0.000019929777,0.057942867],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983556,0.00008785716,0.0004855886,0.00026928,0.00039150886,0.0004101618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975258,0.00020941773,0.00023632654,0.00036904146,0.0009221679,0.00073725905],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006455805,0.0001302021,0.0001926551,0.0007565732,0.00020310907,0.000099578094,0.00040422982,0.00013785182,0.0010772292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013608045,0.00012561615,0.00008399728,0.0018258914,0.00013831079,0.000866712,0.00003143786,0.00016821483,0.00013662016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000843653,0.0000864638,0.10445416,0.000012760155,0.00003024653,1.5733475e-7,0.012307767,0.000003715103,0.00020539008,0.2915276,0.5422265,0.049136776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011232895,0.000016143144,0.06960191,0.000060391587,0.000012344074,7.108829e-7,0.0024197642,5.643718e-7,0.000056491204,0.00046892205,0.9270903,0.00016012785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8680636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96342105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8052735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040881275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008913005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776254019","doi":"","title":"Court of Appeal for Ontario","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049438034363779984,"score_gpt":0.352817163533141,"score_spread":0.30337912916936105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776254019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023632176,0.000011706481,0.000015407037,0.03684592,0.00084212155,0.00019269703,0.000039372444,0.0000039533866,0.93841666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93295723,0.000058940142,0.0017964679,0.0003187699,0.00030687818,0.000018847597,0.000010388356,0.000005975984,0.06452651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944985,0.000020620957,0.000158737,0.00007493411,0.0001283178,0.000167527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906033,0.000096043426,0.0002135243,0.00022026921,0.0002402879,0.00016954486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043492237,0.000040146962,0.00009146876,0.0001525534,0.00057433284,0.00005051526,0.0002910726,0.00005784636,0.0008027947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010341026,0.00004457696,0.000036614158,0.00010730086,0.00019850738,0.00036574862,0.0000063007233,0.000087758184,0.0000103445955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070709884,0.000027591117,0.031716544,0.0000108607155,0.000017013395,6.062148e-7,0.021779398,7.347409e-7,0.00000648626,0.7612924,0.17956722,0.005574062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095285744,0.00001283933,0.02589909,0.0000059961567,0.000009336066,1.0357708e-7,0.0011989537,6.190816e-7,0.000013467518,0.0018678774,0.97084737,0.0000490755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99266356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90932506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018175265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073643015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777257781","doi":"","title":"My Friends Muddy the Waters: How a Statement of Principles Became a Public Fiasco","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Opposition (politics); Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Racism; Work (physics); Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Public relations; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.0825503013527463,"score_gpt":0.37894456186137304,"score_spread":0.2963942605086267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777257781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27521363,0.00033003223,0.0010246082,0.6876579,0.0007301644,0.00022983267,0.000004935716,0.000021773236,0.034787126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860454,0.0012213633,0.00007759889,0.00021478212,0.00038874496,0.000011918733,0.0000021187248,0.000007391043,0.012030683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978399,0.0002439531,0.00024086474,0.000108673165,0.00044965048,0.0011169286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985319,0.00008923529,0.0006503048,0.00031000737,0.0003418212,0.00007672615],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00556307,0.00007866971,0.000099078265,0.00007954474,0.002527878,0.0010848813,0.0007991967,0.000046677014,0.00018199094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013356996,0.000052762713,0.000070190494,0.00015781981,0.00030090977,0.0015015554,0.000053967393,0.0013072225,0.000016161595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009334922,0.00008870068,0.0037101344,0.0000021767294,0.00012235757,4.4328047e-7,0.013901514,0.0000015143835,0.000057268888,0.9711534,0.0010849431,0.009868228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030213708,0.000102138896,0.002588288,0.000010816104,0.000032915443,0.000016024276,0.075984575,0.000010813924,0.00006130416,0.06481121,0.85597366,0.00010614707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021316842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014473256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90634215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005254531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009580741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777900688","doi":"","title":"Law Reform Commission of British Columbia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024586904895522035,"score_gpt":0.2994282357507725,"score_spread":0.2748413308552505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777900688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047430295,0.00010766845,3.4972535e-7,0.009498442,0.00071629166,0.00016133173,0.00019830649,0.000015099042,0.94187224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746421,0.0023849756,0.00042390297,0.0002698983,0.00017018843,0.000011321075,0.000016217382,0.000009076438,0.02207232],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904644,0.000059146743,0.00027307088,0.00012664135,0.00025032018,0.00024435183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858636,0.000054768632,0.00033054192,0.00039417564,0.00033282448,0.0003013436],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004610922,0.000053341388,0.0001491076,0.0003370765,0.0013003766,0.0003158381,0.0004976904,0.00012217044,0.0007118064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037104386,0.000082683575,0.00008085088,0.0008985285,0.0012382603,0.00069675996,0.000022287732,0.00013687361,0.0000058933274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005931596,0.000099130535,0.1246539,0.000041498006,0.000050402614,0.0000074043674,0.004743103,7.5153984e-8,0.000024696421,0.40272626,0.44958115,0.018066451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089221234,0.000017180724,0.11655314,0.000031135638,0.000012295248,7.24361e-7,0.0021125763,1.0713804e-7,0.0000042785587,0.0016449178,0.8794471,0.00008731351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9272118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058172147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009762129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779135777","doi":"","title":"Law Society of Upper Canada. Department of Continuing Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Continuing education; Medicine; Medical education","score_opus":0.015955711093453225,"score_gpt":0.29331651526226354,"score_spread":0.2773608041688103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779135777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28240812,0.00042465454,0.0000012575214,0.02685865,0.0014615855,0.00032408795,0.0002511707,0.000007799902,0.68826264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944511,0.0021465982,0.00091209146,0.00045441624,0.00014419937,0.000016164524,0.000027975148,0.000006906995,0.0018405294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990173,0.000051554347,0.00031900755,0.00011736895,0.00028079835,0.00021397878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838823,0.00008957406,0.00049782154,0.00032704565,0.00049804396,0.00019926294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034250275,0.00007926796,0.00016274306,0.00024391532,0.00048156572,0.00004499513,0.00033965614,0.00007898663,0.00014847492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026949093,0.00008574402,0.00009776247,0.0006917009,0.0007162321,0.00038078148,0.000014460233,0.0000918373,6.466439e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005157807,0.00007815404,0.16708876,0.00004846107,0.00006818558,2.4984124e-7,0.00802442,4.4894816e-7,0.000063649524,0.5529386,0.26384586,0.007838043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000684922,0.000009522431,0.06837917,0.0000335972,0.00002379561,1.4718785e-7,0.007846027,2.1277812e-7,0.00015983959,0.00041017187,0.92298746,0.00008153588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99870425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.712043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008200012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006032562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780082174","doi":"","title":"Nova Scotia law news.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03399453352204534,"score_gpt":0.30978477443488217,"score_spread":0.2757902409128368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780082174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006241004,0.000036824407,0.00001031724,0.05898482,0.0009555565,0.00015633646,0.000038439706,0.000029040988,0.9335477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88331866,0.00020040471,0.0006122062,0.004731293,0.0006405507,0.000007252901,0.0000068969616,0.000017573053,0.11046516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989261,0.00008924586,0.00024219022,0.0001576378,0.00023843833,0.0003464027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988222,0.00021653925,0.00011181149,0.00022809667,0.0001966331,0.0004247351],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034794328,0.00008431646,0.00011484275,0.0003010279,0.0002481073,0.00005893008,0.00025289322,0.00009657741,0.0037148527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056907925,0.00007142251,0.000043450407,0.00050959614,0.00030034446,0.0005979835,0.000009923859,0.00011048315,0.00049522385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019246977,0.000010583628,0.004297099,0.0000024877688,0.000007831942,0.0000020655193,0.0017402413,6.858578e-8,0.00001989629,0.8883409,0.09522827,0.010348642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113105736,0.000010207123,0.0031527753,0.000016896045,0.000008865733,7.041787e-7,0.0004842593,4.056685e-8,0.000025562505,0.003910138,0.99216336,0.00011406267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9766677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99737936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8969351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018696373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033029444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780269994","doi":"","title":"University of British Columbia. Law Student Legal Advice Program.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Law; Legal advice; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.015485077507370014,"score_gpt":0.29277095182237023,"score_spread":0.27728587431500024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780269994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14121856,0.00009787905,3.548366e-7,0.0071750903,0.0006187567,0.00033109204,0.00020527409,0.000039067625,0.85031396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96966213,0.0027181008,0.00097190513,0.0002161199,0.00015113904,0.000005257618,0.000017598984,0.000008799423,0.026248973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900633,0.000082115024,0.00018595165,0.00016533505,0.0002863463,0.00027393058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985988,0.000055697776,0.00029931092,0.00033659008,0.0004128836,0.00029671614],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036802236,0.000057874437,0.00014985896,0.0002875778,0.001358291,0.0004013552,0.00063628366,0.00010493426,0.0005371504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016351577,0.00010488406,0.00009316442,0.0010246743,0.0014956143,0.0008432416,0.000032545504,0.00014351848,0.000007339053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009198556,0.00035708497,0.28221026,0.000040371902,0.00013272277,0.00003897716,0.0076349434,3.3852737e-7,0.000003982875,0.20938426,0.46426386,0.035923995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012489661,0.000028023587,0.20532726,0.000017352204,0.000024955982,6.815611e-7,0.0064902413,1.4211048e-7,3.1786507e-7,0.00018261054,0.78771305,0.000090480666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8284435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045584133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013226457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782030223","doi":"","title":"Ontario Court of Appeal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0388234338851943,"score_gpt":0.33377769511890454,"score_spread":0.29495426123371027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782030223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05109918,0.000013040115,0.0000029375885,0.03225431,0.00076198525,0.00008804151,0.0000147562005,0.000003891503,0.9157619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91957486,0.000081089085,0.00048968225,0.0002550138,0.00019978275,0.000004248405,0.000004506154,0.000003893602,0.079386905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936485,0.0000350176,0.00016853235,0.000077381796,0.00018280317,0.00017143862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990448,0.000057169804,0.00022381914,0.00027339853,0.00019262246,0.00020822824],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041299232,0.000043395772,0.00009371739,0.0001853182,0.00055103924,0.000057222813,0.0003423924,0.000061332685,0.0026120646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077077973,0.000048243026,0.000030284818,0.0001573478,0.00027039883,0.00045169445,0.000009595094,0.00014056834,0.000044471737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049800174,0.00004045423,0.123819925,0.000008223701,0.000021335827,0.000003339913,0.04614623,0.0000010284325,0.000007780863,0.62378705,0.19645554,0.009704132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000605061,0.000007568112,0.07722397,0.0000063243906,0.000006954068,1.8641562e-7,0.00093846594,2.587808e-7,0.000009330273,0.00093176187,0.9207658,0.000048882048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99629724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8684757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014508946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008104453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782490736","doi":"","title":"What More do you Want?! A Systematic Review of the Literature Surrounding Knowledge, Skills and Attributes in Clinical Legal Education: What Regulators and Governing Bodies Asked Universities to do and How we Have Responded","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Frequently asked questions; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.12181212548617615,"score_gpt":0.46605584947867995,"score_spread":0.3442437239925038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782490736","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003210044,0.96789896,6.367735e-7,0.022615174,0.0010314803,0.0031291312,0.00007462494,0.000023952905,0.0020160063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018567545,0.9351786,0.000043946857,0.00006992676,0.000331285,0.000020650594,0.000043412,0.000032365886,0.06242305],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903334,0.0064194156,0.0007778839,0.0008926768,0.0009845569,0.00059206365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908934,0.004434531,0.0012682504,0.0011104402,0.0018786951,0.0004146742],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009229923,0.00045367554,0.0019317194,0.0013821531,0.0021045667,0.004314745,0.0012545994,0.0005608321,0.000022058191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081330985,0.0003770564,0.00033407687,0.0021914,0.0017329063,0.005253544,0.00092598,0.0019771082,0.0000055487126],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010911138,0.0005113293,0.005168076,0.593262,0.0008522138,0.00009937396,0.08719223,1.4663901e-7,1.9639675e-7,0.115939505,0.003885757,0.19298002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017988282,0.000032276665,0.00032981602,0.33538947,0.00034393318,0.000015542451,0.053093713,3.9266862e-7,6.254773e-8,0.00006490166,0.61030257,0.0002474684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049790344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047406843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60641676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071251625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008690175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783052119","doi":"","title":"Alberta law collection.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022679242597692995,"score_gpt":0.28939385567023324,"score_spread":0.26671461307254024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783052119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019081583,0.000020804728,0.0000065212625,0.060552996,0.00068543473,0.00015056985,0.000017404473,0.000018463516,0.93663967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5045102,0.00023473531,0.0002739222,0.0022691204,0.0003482886,0.000027580714,0.000003857256,0.000011471756,0.49232078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991128,0.00009309675,0.00020117477,0.00013157238,0.00018882094,0.00027252518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988155,0.00039613555,0.00009187509,0.00017049017,0.00018433045,0.0003417062],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029746434,0.00006777938,0.00009405387,0.00030035904,0.00048457095,0.000044257667,0.00017587346,0.00008528649,0.0028506224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079834845,0.000057801557,0.00003691296,0.0006182569,0.00021908885,0.0004663898,0.000006634443,0.00008477728,0.00018623447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000216391,0.00000938505,0.0016072411,0.0000015581874,0.000007687655,7.2900525e-7,0.0025267308,6.297897e-8,0.000009497975,0.8403113,0.15280531,0.002718321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105881285,0.000010693158,0.0017671271,0.000010465234,0.000007875656,7.7871954e-7,0.00041175692,1.044268e-7,0.000020115862,0.0042994055,0.9932727,0.000093084534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98306984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8404674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022906903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031880848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783059405","doi":"","title":"Canada law journal.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020532895462418245,"score_gpt":0.27705742528411875,"score_spread":0.2565245298217005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783059405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022228109,0.000047307345,0.0000036530544,0.0933274,0.0010598482,0.00007981459,0.00004269863,0.000008271265,0.9032082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87881345,0.00042647705,0.00024295451,0.00582947,0.00071824464,0.0000074167738,0.0000024633307,0.000012350053,0.11394718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989334,0.00010292577,0.00023819544,0.00009327807,0.00031088424,0.00032136068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986479,0.0002333078,0.00013605258,0.00014406582,0.00027590056,0.0005627379],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004484873,0.00006656163,0.0000967765,0.00020038361,0.0006114772,0.000059897713,0.0002455823,0.00005686758,0.0019491708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069922925,0.00005366616,0.000029208313,0.00033941443,0.00014690276,0.00045579547,0.000006038673,0.00014334204,0.000027941647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011603212,0.000004138217,0.0009201675,0.000001303085,0.000008061089,0.000007098043,0.00071876496,1.08371246e-7,0.000004500107,0.6789495,0.31044748,0.008937769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008537848,0.0000060890193,0.0020791828,0.000013344429,0.0000068194227,0.0000033421754,0.0006525443,3.099296e-8,0.000009099201,0.0027820137,0.99427384,0.00008831731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8765906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005444853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020689007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784580253","doi":"","title":"What We Talk About When We Talk About Skills: Toward a Taxonomy of Legal Skills for Teaching and Leaning in Ontario","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxonomy (biology); Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.02029797424602756,"score_gpt":0.27544286141861385,"score_spread":0.25514488717258627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784580253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33814833,0.0004565165,0.00019098334,0.30659065,0.0043286225,0.003174288,0.00012769399,0.00025634814,0.3467266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17363848,0.0019157141,0.0063523883,0.00022558223,0.00021927916,0.000016981943,0.00053545623,0.000045555036,0.8170506],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980217,0.0003190365,0.00032973493,0.00054418086,0.00035348113,0.000431837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779785,0.00056731264,0.0009254761,0.00035203528,0.00016508422,0.00019222677],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040300706,0.00032498644,0.00049722055,0.0006521153,0.0012738134,0.0011282087,0.0007049865,0.00047981675,0.0007425434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048447624,0.00039796243,0.00017199865,0.00025896658,0.00025218318,0.013061849,0.000090300855,0.0013906335,0.0000070578185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043999933,0.0008476942,0.010666422,0.0006417117,0.00033437271,0.00008163588,0.62249386,0.000013517517,0.00001399516,0.12549338,0.19440489,0.04456851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047093874,0.000045632736,0.0060210545,0.00086771033,0.000076852084,2.3499231e-7,0.13384563,8.450674e-7,0.000094595205,0.0007578059,0.85744786,0.00037081513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5888807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43262798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.663043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041008057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003959927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784706239","doi":"","title":"Ontario Bar Association.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Association (psychology); Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.027556995994193395,"score_gpt":0.30027892471458406,"score_spread":0.2727219287203907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784706239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0332589,0.00006161253,9.4693064e-7,0.060997054,0.0015857359,0.0001446196,0.00003867209,0.000017692495,0.9038948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84072787,0.0019236542,0.00071520096,0.001004051,0.0005586784,0.000024728866,0.000018869374,0.000011439292,0.15501548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890655,0.00007020392,0.00021948396,0.00014339919,0.0003186798,0.00034170144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845886,0.00012568117,0.00036493203,0.00036955116,0.0003536108,0.00032737182],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006835086,0.00008316345,0.00012590057,0.0009258804,0.0018315441,0.00031175677,0.0004829019,0.00014975017,0.0026795808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001660066,0.00009343544,0.00008932409,0.0007868368,0.00031226352,0.00085413374,0.000015525085,0.00021735465,0.000100457015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018556274,0.000019646292,0.5549116,0.0000024484982,0.000036202364,0.0000015366626,0.008623558,1.014562e-7,0.0000015229423,0.17691073,0.25764483,0.0018459696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006408353,0.000006556549,0.26920468,0.0000045662423,0.000014946253,1.06478645e-7,0.00091316254,5.2158317e-8,0.0000019591498,0.0010334238,0.7286723,0.00008415422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99556565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.807469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034220962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040331883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785723375","doi":"10.36510/learnland.v3i2.341","title":"Education for Its Own Sake","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LEARNing Landscapes","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Legal education; Product (mathematics); Law; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.023499086717905703,"score_gpt":0.3715802986251923,"score_spread":0.34808121190728664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785723375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40598696,0.00007484221,0.00028422376,0.08191269,0.0039694826,0.00036809567,0.000002730838,0.00022819095,0.50717276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95603955,0.000011173109,0.0014456222,0.0005356594,0.0011253892,0.000058181482,0.000025927533,0.0000072232297,0.040751304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994998,0.000057751047,0.00009070329,0.000103003884,0.00011100064,0.00013773047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992389,0.00031098662,0.00008199632,0.00006516831,0.0002463918,0.000056538804],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054789387,0.000043337266,0.00004745605,0.00006232361,0.0007126582,0.00019321505,0.000099988545,0.00007060022,0.0012846004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003365576,0.00004149997,0.000025989735,0.00022141558,0.000021513675,0.00035958973,0.000005772921,0.00034991564,0.00016023527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001517107,0.0001862955,0.020461034,0.000019088931,0.000015160417,9.965371e-8,0.03175788,0.000022878112,0.0039247205,0.7873418,0.05397805,0.10227785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006968866,0.000010672872,0.002237609,0.000003358591,0.0000062822805,5.1034357e-7,0.0033059272,0.000055448825,0.00011321026,0.00080173067,0.993331,0.00006453824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028402713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017887561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.939353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011660482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074650574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786196451","doi":"","title":"Manitoba Bar Association.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Association (psychology); Geography; Meteorology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03404228600575988,"score_gpt":0.32448398944490425,"score_spread":0.2904417034391444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786196451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023416523,0.00007706829,0.0000061902956,0.016617458,0.0014684023,0.00012247326,0.00001902227,0.00007206612,0.9582008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980491,0.00283253,0.0006397014,0.0006783037,0.0009245402,0.000005098926,0.000009731348,0.000018891282,0.014400229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986245,0.00033026136,0.00027427354,0.00016521772,0.0003748195,0.00023094036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835426,0.0001904584,0.0005850723,0.00044598815,0.00033113186,0.00009308635],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013721279,0.00009193164,0.00011688768,0.00014812122,0.0018069632,0.00040491053,0.0006278761,0.00005584229,0.00034192423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016039701,0.00009417573,0.000102658545,0.000281046,0.0005776361,0.0010941848,0.000071480834,0.00018763942,0.00029383638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061028254,0.0001196838,0.1110109,0.0000084926505,0.000056758232,0.0000040092773,0.0055491305,1.7643289e-7,0.000028654156,0.7797696,0.0998142,0.0036322877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011162311,0.000012771967,0.11626424,0.000009000428,0.000021758064,1.8285232e-7,0.001438026,9.370819e-8,0.0000111113,0.0010713312,0.8809563,0.00010354335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013920741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00864794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95707446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003781421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010816287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787008886","doi":"10.29173/alr1340","title":"Advocacy in the New Millennium","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Best practice; Law; Legal profession; Political science; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Engineering ethics; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.04911185652060671,"score_gpt":0.3970555956888248,"score_spread":0.3479437391682181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787008886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006582588,0.025779538,0.0000031716827,0.25042656,0.00019959018,0.00025362286,7.646835e-8,0.0000046275245,0.723267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31229627,0.22884196,0.000682584,0.37174127,0.00051361346,0.00015871183,0.000013276071,0.000021168467,0.08573113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888355,0.0005386964,0.00018235676,0.000094287345,0.00015733417,0.00014377457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989129,0.0007282854,0.00006449125,0.00020567884,0.000042314077,0.000046389327],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011892245,0.000051128805,0.00009191489,0.000013185228,0.000219497,0.000070972616,0.00020674804,0.000028440389,0.0025911897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025618107,0.000035293433,0.000037350932,0.0007221684,0.00005721381,0.00030668016,0.0000042280362,0.00017364675,0.00061332143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.5716964e-7,0.000021675245,0.00005791496,0.000021497483,0.0000014895328,1.977781e-7,0.0034786067,2.6729841e-8,1.8566884e-7,0.82456565,0.17003076,0.0018218566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043158212,0.0000032330736,0.000056902936,0.00014456401,0.000011926266,0.0000017243693,0.00056944793,3.845316e-8,0.0000010328423,0.0015741427,0.9975427,0.00005113541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09840633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08221634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8275119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002422346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070183165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788315893","doi":"10.7202/1058308ar","title":"Guyana - How Do You Know Where to Get the Information You Need? Determining Ethics Approval Requirements in a Developing Country","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Research ethics; Interview; Principal (computer security); Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Political science; Ethical code; Developing country; Sociology; Business; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Economic growth; Economics; Computer security","score_opus":0.10463932559638069,"score_gpt":0.38910393861650355,"score_spread":0.2844646130201229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788315893","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110731184,0.00026168936,0.0008045752,0.86792505,0.0033866237,0.00040759068,0.000018927407,0.000009594341,0.016454786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789233,0.00019505579,0.0028554224,0.016898606,0.00039186847,0.0000044631774,0.000006230575,0.000010109064,0.0007149467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983573,0.00032259538,0.00037812174,0.000080330894,0.00053825625,0.00032338413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769634,0.00040747336,0.00043828352,0.00015039381,0.0010184174,0.0002890909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059962342,0.0000912966,0.0001256996,0.000415199,0.00064877444,0.00092890207,0.00044324656,0.00027566822,0.000097968485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005421206,0.00007924838,0.000033760094,0.001113697,0.00022683425,0.0020095895,0.00001653408,0.0017018069,0.00004438575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023600658,0.000014125155,0.05427115,0.000092225244,0.000052648556,0.000014282336,0.6036561,0.00021850721,0.00002283102,0.28965795,0.024218304,0.027758276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014945,0.000030341604,0.0015745326,0.00018820264,0.000008015229,0.000008683638,0.10706519,0.000027840482,0.000008059367,0.00043984628,0.8903858,0.0001140532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04373045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3985779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86819214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067177584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020831246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98471975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789004301","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5020","title":"REDUCING THE “JUSTICE GAP” THROUGH ACCESS TO LEGAL INFORMATION: ESTABLISHING ACCESS TO JUSTICE ENTRY POINTS AT PUBLIC LIBRARIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Economic Justice; Public access; Context (archaeology); Political science; Intermediary; Public relations; Information access; Scope (computer science); Law; Business; Public administration; Sociology; Internet privacy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.13096704119874325,"score_gpt":0.40694695882814635,"score_spread":0.2759799176294031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789004301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076972656,0.000060346567,0.005082103,0.34079134,0.0067318836,0.001902431,0.000078301855,0.0002349175,0.568146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8839276,0.00006272068,0.0062837484,0.09628398,0.00628426,0.00025384908,0.000046954203,0.000068606016,0.00678833],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566305,0.0004157822,0.001004728,0.00057541084,0.0013891232,0.00095192826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935787,0.0021986945,0.00068176386,0.0009403422,0.0020070903,0.0005934315],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019058824,0.00035443995,0.00037712537,0.00056114944,0.002957202,0.011977471,0.0044894246,0.00022512265,0.0032850625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021853484,0.00032351047,0.00009008284,0.0046814675,0.00045231197,0.04828273,0.002149041,0.000652969,0.0010860858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003857499,0.00021203807,0.0015043353,0.000557522,0.00010172972,0.0000041605986,0.113573626,0.00064694305,0.00011368372,0.124727,0.7535109,0.004662338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030116402,0.000091232454,0.007573616,0.00020495562,0.00063676,0.000006527639,0.024322823,0.000062471605,0.0012968818,0.00047302397,0.96451664,0.0005138831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007972751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031068018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8069549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003792592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023217946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789070291","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5021","title":"OUT OF THE CLOSET AND UP THE LADDER? DIVERSITY IN ONTARIO’S BIG LAW FIRMS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Closet; Lesbian; Negotiation; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Legal profession; Public relations; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1411676094563412,"score_gpt":0.3840802655985737,"score_spread":0.24291265614223254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789070291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7677158,0.000012834169,0.000011011022,0.025923595,0.0014936189,0.0002971313,0.000008816085,0.000008017321,0.20452917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937551,0.0000041250883,0.000051981766,0.0022735463,0.000187109,0.0000035322744,4.9672303e-7,0.000002936268,0.0037211718],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992623,0.00011167961,0.00014827015,0.00010487038,0.00025374524,0.00011913986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991885,0.00026057317,0.00012681712,0.00019432463,0.00019197253,0.000037815866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057948165,0.000049445855,0.000080691025,0.00004177142,0.00042165353,0.000084019266,0.00052766973,0.00004754281,0.00032997128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049544236,0.000033676613,0.000020945463,0.00031974597,0.0004756912,0.00037240842,0.00032073562,0.00019348889,0.000016636108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012719384,0.00021069162,0.2238734,0.000053812397,0.000051409213,6.729228e-7,0.54190826,0.000010469368,0.00022992947,0.2036043,0.027202202,0.0027276329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022409795,0.00003473948,0.49419442,0.000040563442,0.000088709196,2.165588e-7,0.011732556,0.0000036357103,0.00039392483,0.0018751031,0.49131867,0.00009336819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3553134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7623826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53017575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005166755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041579004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64897966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789341889","doi":"","title":"Disclosure practices in Toronto: report to the federal Department of Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.0509517717885384,"score_gpt":0.39302401189028197,"score_spread":0.3420722401017436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789341889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050530955,0.000075827,0.0000016861895,0.06934579,0.0008652233,0.00037467826,0.000032228767,0.000005357783,0.87876827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714052,0.00021379173,0.00042192408,0.00076807546,0.0003690105,0.000047135196,0.000010138943,0.0000074131785,0.026757307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882793,0.00012458065,0.0003422026,0.00015499523,0.0003037843,0.0002465269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998104,0.00022614063,0.00074882543,0.0004945655,0.00019738985,0.00022910631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012244274,0.0000745437,0.00013194345,0.00008953219,0.0007977015,0.00016100335,0.00047449936,0.00006382841,0.00033056558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006169104,0.000063316125,0.00003370208,0.00014579137,0.00012924554,0.0008105122,0.000027272386,0.00014208366,0.000009907288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039866,0.00015627377,0.15111502,0.00005324062,0.000061026007,0.00008555307,0.044563074,0.00001131896,0.000012507188,0.6008639,0.18993033,0.013107942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059705373,0.000014745576,0.13886592,0.000013592786,0.0000225978,0.0000022493819,0.006201732,4.778781e-7,0.00000475606,0.00021633146,0.85452986,0.00006805036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98019356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92087424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031688096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033455854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7385439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789344170","doi":"","title":"Practice update for general practitioners: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on June [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continuing education; Library science; Continuing medical education; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.015963775914948037,"score_gpt":0.3265455390250596,"score_spread":0.3105817631101116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789344170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058127504,0.00010493317,0.0003975511,0.13739154,0.011246974,0.00477681,0.0010016843,0.000083313476,0.7868697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51866996,0.001091791,0.034302752,0.011722002,0.0044093225,0.003456594,0.0003621305,0.00011350162,0.42587194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984813,0.00018422284,0.00045835343,0.00027436222,0.00021120056,0.0003905753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975659,0.00099996,0.00044307622,0.00021134471,0.0005587811,0.00022088508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001222841,0.00012943255,0.0001968772,0.00051096646,0.0002465811,0.00011582376,0.00018188225,0.00013324799,0.00022945448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056895087,0.00012336446,0.00005014766,0.00034070096,0.00008183946,0.0016902898,0.0000075224816,0.0000867268,0.00001187133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019790717,0.00015532057,0.00005002225,0.00002882538,0.000020951422,0.0000012279116,0.004559171,0.0000013197026,0.0007412042,0.44942042,0.53181815,0.013005476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049354916,0.000069387715,0.00008313692,0.00010323832,0.000031428375,0.0000012552188,0.002920586,8.3799813e-7,0.00060044095,0.0024478766,0.9930722,0.0001760221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35849386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8858539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004964508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004815767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8542964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789346103","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms: a guide for students","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Civil rights; Law","score_opus":0.025420101712067628,"score_gpt":0.3465174871243064,"score_spread":0.32109738541223876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789346103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010410387,0.000061676925,0.000008636562,0.052536566,0.0009753737,0.00061276497,0.0002081387,0.000010512374,0.93517596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.868972,0.0001529657,0.00029658974,0.0010027302,0.0004377254,0.000105901345,0.000007748913,0.000013810603,0.12901051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870795,0.000084338775,0.00034031956,0.00013473177,0.000319064,0.00041357885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981326,0.00049045833,0.00017136862,0.0002593959,0.00044800394,0.00049816107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089197914,0.00008277606,0.0001223766,0.0003341443,0.00095740816,0.00007587483,0.000520779,0.00009169767,0.00029891662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008759807,0.000055423523,0.000058658887,0.00030993277,0.0003475886,0.00027195728,0.00000836542,0.00007678201,0.00002632649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000577748,0.000014064363,0.005765171,0.000003934658,0.000037404534,0.0000010634604,0.0052196933,6.9374636e-8,0.000012130244,0.7279135,0.25408527,0.0069419285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018020703,0.0000191187,0.0076559735,0.000018999865,0.000014649951,2.7573236e-7,0.000491771,1.3739681e-7,0.00001715601,0.00754331,0.98397344,0.00008496774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99573755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85856164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003722007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007012371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789379068","doi":"10.11575/prism/34017","title":"Whistleblowers: All truth is good, but not all truth is good to say","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Post truth; Alethiology; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Coherence theory of truth; Political science; Pragmatic theory of truth","score_opus":0.03678165661994946,"score_gpt":0.29284150747396775,"score_spread":0.2560598508540183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789379068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08479707,0.00006027788,0.010112448,0.104420505,0.0013513949,0.00038643408,0.000008553497,0.00010311847,0.7987602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72819227,0.00019671611,0.04441286,0.018799596,0.00011126981,0.0000022282113,0.000027616781,0.00003162356,0.20822582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984753,0.00020745107,0.00016624136,0.0003245797,0.0004891197,0.0003373135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987178,0.0002646812,0.00019169849,0.00030528556,0.00023294619,0.00028761546],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006174628,0.0001306344,0.0001965266,0.00019630627,0.000499914,0.0000755445,0.00043293467,0.00016793616,0.0052968482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060220767,0.00016824117,0.00011714888,0.0006051102,0.00017423098,0.0008007994,0.000053193013,0.00030503338,0.0005433069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078084035,0.0005574295,0.0012327671,0.000026042815,0.00021451953,0.000018561328,0.21605822,3.0891553e-7,0.00044391357,0.48274338,0.27243602,0.026190734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003947646,0.000060901697,0.0015572896,0.000009377192,0.00007176343,9.805684e-7,0.00870396,0.000032830594,0.00033525095,0.0012126217,0.9874051,0.00021511115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013173602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031713772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7149691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019543277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006861449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99561244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789467741","doi":"","title":"Canadian legal literature = Documentation juridique au Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Political science; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.008980612761382714,"score_gpt":0.2712292628897773,"score_spread":0.26224865012839454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789467741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015084377,0.00005392216,0.0000036668184,0.117664196,0.0012255341,0.0002336116,0.00027312853,0.000015947639,0.8654456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86991054,0.0002493374,0.0001576643,0.003066732,0.0007210654,0.000030891893,0.000052629177,0.000016711992,0.12579446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984597,0.0001446717,0.00029244463,0.00020436096,0.00033136722,0.0005674864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998033,0.00018627015,0.00012910106,0.00022326998,0.00034178072,0.0010865616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004160079,0.00012574597,0.00013188498,0.0006255866,0.00056876795,0.00013889083,0.0002737918,0.00013554753,0.0013812811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007146028,0.00011256146,0.000036620517,0.00082053104,0.00009803586,0.0010483222,0.000006342287,0.0001871904,0.000034537992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037006848,0.0000064470764,0.009227846,0.000008293615,0.000017721648,0.000026215566,0.005076351,5.593473e-7,0.000015901422,0.74652815,0.23162237,0.007466439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011176624,0.000008274254,0.011433725,0.00004110459,0.00001006484,0.00000251388,0.00060840003,9.568804e-8,0.00002492805,0.0006514261,0.9869447,0.00016302004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99999243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85482615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033078007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12403319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789675362","doi":"","title":"Law Courts Education Society of British Columbia.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.019824658939523742,"score_gpt":0.2979113655231361,"score_spread":0.27808670658361234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789675362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096965685,0.000269523,9.846174e-7,0.016678603,0.001501628,0.00024949963,0.00022548549,0.000018055065,0.88409054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687024,0.006421299,0.0013386594,0.0011705521,0.00039813935,0.000028954333,0.0000334807,0.0000122791525,0.021894256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901706,0.000057097375,0.00026903755,0.00015321388,0.000257265,0.00024632693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838173,0.00007083865,0.00038165433,0.0003633495,0.0005389767,0.00026346496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004511045,0.000058547717,0.00014314706,0.0002225035,0.001220644,0.00038892555,0.00042223794,0.0001321142,0.0005175727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028219336,0.00010093305,0.00012861587,0.00078782777,0.001333128,0.0007756842,0.000016234842,0.00013230338,0.0000053249414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010707075,0.00008330362,0.07105384,0.000025341564,0.00003442389,4.4537535e-7,0.0029990962,7.228143e-8,0.000010039541,0.11506459,0.79839945,0.012328338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006806597,0.000010698501,0.11513937,0.000029572917,0.000018767367,6.7701563e-7,0.0035855458,1.6315629e-7,0.0000025985682,0.002677084,0.8783701,0.000097346514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99714535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99931186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8717367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004739878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035253493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.938833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789987600","doi":"","title":"A survey of the collection of Canadian statutes and subordinate legislation held in the Sir James Dunn Law Library","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Statute; Political science","score_opus":0.030016438878281575,"score_gpt":0.27236931957191396,"score_spread":0.2423528806936324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789987600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21507008,0.00014078649,7.2577734e-7,0.04790268,0.00028251307,0.0003881368,0.00024627728,0.000005293422,0.7359635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917771,0.00047399563,0.000034249402,0.00069231284,0.000040138613,0.000012875592,0.000009678141,0.000006814522,0.006952814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877506,0.0004595878,0.0002727581,0.00010392672,0.00018643221,0.00020224357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986573,0.00069988455,0.00018814117,0.00017122838,0.0001508008,0.00013263512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009049034,0.00006673419,0.000115804345,0.00057207746,0.00025756677,0.000037798138,0.00022135249,0.0000783752,0.00013344438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008176274,0.00004370995,0.000023764707,0.0017100701,0.0003293151,0.0005920184,0.000009201474,0.00011004848,0.0000010324162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136309145,0.000022745957,0.37195265,0.000014438562,0.00001677231,0.0000010186607,0.020625612,0.0000013399938,0.000024556115,0.5611705,0.041364435,0.004792268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008707975,0.000012632609,0.4096371,0.000023914074,0.000005370266,3.0052288e-7,0.0010066652,8.0111226e-7,0.000039214894,0.0013830073,0.5877569,0.000047016332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99792576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77670705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008092345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004949476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8780158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790181628","doi":"","title":"Index to Canadian legal literature, 1985-2000 = L'index a la documentation juridique au Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Documentation; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.009155307262152324,"score_gpt":0.27177022292961106,"score_spread":0.26261491566745876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790181628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008717474,0.00031856197,0.000020448122,0.24115245,0.0036786203,0.00052282127,0.0010170727,0.00001635742,0.7445562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6603549,0.00055569236,0.00014712382,0.008680557,0.0013261981,0.000072419134,0.000054692828,0.000040774918,0.32876763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965274,0.0004674339,0.00067416066,0.00047926558,0.0006344835,0.0012172831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952847,0.00048183967,0.00026879145,0.00043065578,0.0006349917,0.0028990617],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008009508,0.00034098196,0.00032750645,0.0013164025,0.00067528617,0.00033158393,0.0005337987,0.0004118821,0.0026015104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009974402,0.00034260153,0.00008824802,0.0024407844,0.00030295626,0.0017165893,0.000022489567,0.0005079672,0.00014945187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015880745,0.000026672997,0.0099808285,0.000034724075,0.000058970283,0.000098217606,0.010495962,0.000010996417,0.0000063704942,0.57828987,0.3655314,0.03545009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027452747,0.000032943888,0.026564535,0.00024210491,0.000035545243,0.000016157146,0.0007310826,0.0000016003087,0.000013376361,0.0009922293,0.97065324,0.0004426596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65163743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008658825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2335092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790304422","doi":"","title":"British Columbia law reports. [First series].","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Law; History; Geography; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.016337047816579832,"score_gpt":0.2592331388064582,"score_spread":0.24289609098987838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790304422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011618467,0.00004130394,0.0000021119583,0.026829835,0.0010104472,0.00022185022,0.000052554187,0.0000456413,0.9601778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.546546,0.0005433695,0.00038143335,0.001858922,0.00049304403,0.000045267454,0.0000122219935,0.000020577218,0.4500992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987146,0.00007332724,0.00035807188,0.0002101836,0.00027706276,0.00036670876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986602,0.00014198732,0.00019259137,0.00026635898,0.0002762902,0.00046257259],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005238071,0.00006632073,0.00013959609,0.00011094202,0.0006102553,0.00028290873,0.00018213304,0.00011386856,0.009857144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091362186,0.00008918672,0.000049134334,0.0004625812,0.0003811372,0.00090590917,0.000012551808,0.00011408917,0.00004299071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018163137,0.00002383011,0.023407124,0.000008738352,0.000016767892,0.00007689938,0.00202754,7.8349984e-8,0.000005918354,0.29597715,0.6686739,0.009780285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074963114,0.000013660522,0.010913444,0.00003332544,0.00001008463,0.000022196946,0.00043851984,1.489986e-8,0.0000027320696,0.0055667404,0.9827864,0.00013787816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99667186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5349275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002267606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031524086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790407233","doi":"","title":"Canadian legal materials held by the National Library of Australia, February 1980","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"National library; Library science; Political science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.03249467620212405,"score_gpt":0.30061376930804745,"score_spread":0.2681190931059234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790407233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07217816,0.00003967748,6.7528657e-7,0.12663844,0.0007040555,0.00026192,0.0013272768,0.000015708089,0.7988341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82708985,0.00010993739,0.00008772706,0.0022067921,0.00038220378,0.000023857494,0.000045038258,0.000012951818,0.17004165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859613,0.0001739684,0.00035548012,0.00014909955,0.00035870657,0.00036660593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987251,0.00028396284,0.00018188577,0.00015564031,0.00018204717,0.00047137617],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005461258,0.000100716104,0.00013844339,0.00040738928,0.00034299734,0.000094709045,0.00040820648,0.00012262497,0.005594848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051491935,0.000075259326,0.00004181208,0.00049601024,0.00026749977,0.00094955094,0.00001192278,0.000113401285,0.000082482606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036209292,0.000009296143,0.0028211072,0.0000046536506,0.000016147478,0.0000014178489,0.0010640915,1.069838e-7,0.00024658872,0.45038226,0.5445593,0.00089143764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087584696,0.00001149772,0.013706121,0.000018572833,0.000008963295,0.0000015477932,0.00033435813,3.3571467e-8,0.0006193957,0.0020869535,0.9830168,0.000108178654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75491166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002615702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010508452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790414707","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association. Ontario Branch. Continuing Legal Education.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Political science; Continuing education; Law; Medicine; Geography; Medical education; Psychology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.01300929917731779,"score_gpt":0.2800485923441868,"score_spread":0.267039293166869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790414707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09126899,0.0001576216,7.148951e-7,0.0841872,0.0034004461,0.00029519893,0.0000967248,0.00002477106,0.8205683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8699299,0.00089843426,0.0004056362,0.0015009192,0.00072124385,0.000043076205,0.000046611643,0.000017869752,0.1264363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982227,0.00011233778,0.0003711784,0.00025294605,0.00038924816,0.0006516071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971039,0.00013476773,0.0004904241,0.0005185008,0.00075987284,0.000992485],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008514612,0.00015580074,0.00021001117,0.0020468736,0.002424308,0.00078954664,0.00071441947,0.00024391178,0.0023410614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019929113,0.00018772743,0.00013027825,0.0011749299,0.00031595744,0.0015849294,0.00001633475,0.00037374406,0.000094733885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020072735,0.000026239804,0.51559377,0.0000044851263,0.000043458807,0.0000018713758,0.009424795,2.5671363e-7,0.0000024871467,0.18342318,0.28647506,0.0050023952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008512171,0.0000071417385,0.2688377,0.000018387842,0.000025990399,5.5158563e-7,0.0017797932,8.061872e-8,0.0000025243457,0.0007412306,0.7283384,0.00016309302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99992424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7786609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014710962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026628314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790558690","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law and health care in Canada: materials prepared for the Continuing Legal Education seminar, Constitutional [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Legal education","score_opus":0.019430342562758614,"score_gpt":0.30801106306355114,"score_spread":0.28858072050079253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790558690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02707955,0.0016916366,0.00008826349,0.14556658,0.0034812773,0.0020380288,0.0016871268,0.000020977744,0.81834656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940778,0.00022961461,0.0002798594,0.0028759113,0.00025268234,0.00012886249,0.000045421857,0.0000033938616,0.0021064538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990073,0.00008758861,0.00031064145,0.00015042342,0.00018270883,0.0002613809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988663,0.00040993633,0.00015861189,0.00010567488,0.00025969296,0.00019973906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053821126,0.000078749705,0.00013300759,0.000101865386,0.00042270106,0.00005783578,0.0001236499,0.00004590104,0.00015336949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004147285,0.00006199827,0.000016302989,0.00016218495,0.00093808194,0.00034709257,0.000008235734,0.00006362628,0.0000012575036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008033758,0.0000058430387,0.0016896575,0.000012017499,0.0000062467498,4.319187e-7,0.0025488918,6.6771804e-7,0.00000863528,0.9714956,0.017940653,0.006283276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019813183,0.00000933052,0.003629587,0.00007056411,0.0000073792066,0.0000033454055,0.004711956,1.7632293e-7,0.000023563,0.00056807976,0.99069315,0.00008475777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99840647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99990064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97275245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013529813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060219888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9451078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790592393","doi":"","title":"Amendments to the Criminal Code and the Canada Evidence Act with respect to persons with disabilities: consultation paper","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Law; Political science; Legislation; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.05059888704551525,"score_gpt":0.3322848641036169,"score_spread":0.28168597705810167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790592393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20981869,0.00004142127,0.000006516966,0.34509516,0.000202802,0.0009075091,0.000104057486,0.000007241252,0.44381663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97477424,0.000062177394,0.00022685321,0.005613503,0.00012178881,0.000104769315,0.00000188508,0.000007903351,0.019086894],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998911,0.000146109,0.00014107027,0.00017234782,0.00037822966,0.00025122098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792707,0.0010278877,0.0001246051,0.00037468414,0.00021873334,0.00032702787],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006186009,0.000090756635,0.00011012586,0.00006918569,0.0017853288,0.00030603714,0.00038789157,0.000023977911,0.00013832853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039295238,0.00005262635,0.000011443874,0.00020217944,0.0005583392,0.00046623117,0.000017247467,0.00014403422,0.0000043539826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000597094,0.00002447683,0.0327304,0.000034961868,0.00009723424,0.00001117955,0.4657962,0.00003377345,0.000008634269,0.32454878,0.16891886,0.0071983878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020173275,0.00004503361,0.029130649,0.000052118467,0.000039370327,0.0000019640825,0.054810356,9.253462e-7,0.0000025497795,0.000080630416,0.9155378,0.00009689971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99786913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7649555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027771306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007659044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790795354","doi":"","title":"University of Alberta. Law Library","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.012382210865184396,"score_gpt":0.23061880293966755,"score_spread":0.21823659207448315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790795354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0181004,0.000073675095,0.000002656791,0.054031767,0.0003140016,0.000093383955,0.00007182088,0.000016642278,0.9272956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9532155,0.0054541123,0.00061483314,0.00055720727,0.00012316012,9.591846e-7,0.000010012149,0.00000881942,0.040015433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993604,0.000083593724,0.00013246952,0.00010354327,0.00013233052,0.00018768861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991358,0.0002600018,0.000112987946,0.00015655029,0.000099647594,0.00023500399],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013156892,0.00005588303,0.000094605006,0.000797915,0.00023564338,0.00001510111,0.00024493336,0.00008271298,0.0025399032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001349932,0.00005087754,0.00006630893,0.0023219453,0.0008115077,0.00080805435,0.000011961621,0.00005368826,0.000029441295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057762277,0.000018048926,0.02509191,0.000004577407,0.000017843458,0.0000010543292,0.003835139,2.8558734e-8,0.00001795363,0.86367023,0.10487343,0.0024639717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009077005,0.000012684164,0.008790548,0.000014550933,0.000011445243,1.4875991e-7,0.0023454404,2.3575877e-8,0.000027110016,0.0019519955,0.98668164,0.00007365745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91793835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93511504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018729614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011973634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790819948","doi":"","title":"Employment law, 1994: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on April 15, 1994","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Political science; Continuing education; Sociology; Library science; Medicine; Medical education; Computer science","score_opus":0.025139699479721334,"score_gpt":0.33205326783687095,"score_spread":0.3069135683571496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790819948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12467539,0.000046300524,0.0000035257926,0.00518562,0.0039251363,0.0011440844,0.00015862865,0.00002604854,0.86483526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92111796,0.00008608656,0.00061049766,0.0013712626,0.0007264588,0.0003259651,0.00005040301,0.000022991986,0.075688355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985765,0.00010328111,0.0004181493,0.00026148354,0.00024709586,0.0003934506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986008,0.00019023455,0.00040398253,0.0004206836,0.00012250096,0.00026183663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081747695,0.00013679346,0.00022635983,0.00033741383,0.0006928208,0.00031017698,0.00039691976,0.00013211636,0.00026560813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008787087,0.00015656576,0.000050161198,0.00014041232,0.00016152028,0.00079637946,0.000018651606,0.00013137214,0.000009122017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007898589,0.00017888886,0.0018152293,0.000048135284,0.000023768456,0.000004068703,0.01835107,0.0000027172578,0.0002325413,0.6617885,0.30242386,0.015052224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027355005,0.000046904173,0.0014800291,0.00011225911,0.000016224889,4.0986535e-7,0.0021443563,7.4660306e-7,0.00035462368,0.0018596897,0.99353397,0.00017726331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91254836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99179554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79644257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004157408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032987192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63845664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790825396","doi":"","title":"Labour Relations Board practice: materials prepared for a continuing legal education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on June 13, 1985","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continuing education; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.017770608631463708,"score_gpt":0.3383889180070136,"score_spread":0.3206183093755499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790825396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079874866,0.000054234977,0.000008464529,0.031611603,0.005048852,0.0011743247,0.00018659106,0.00002964019,0.8820114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74913514,0.0001565371,0.0019315347,0.0011940389,0.0007227923,0.00028774966,0.000047330494,0.0000243617,0.24650049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847454,0.00017664317,0.00045936578,0.00026056307,0.00026084526,0.00036802187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976624,0.00052836764,0.00063716015,0.0004397498,0.00047922405,0.00025305158],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011847654,0.000132115,0.00021453676,0.0004968077,0.00088436186,0.00035881967,0.00035443483,0.0001666512,0.00033879385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009012701,0.00015597774,0.00004687325,0.00026094317,0.0001337383,0.0017700124,0.000016283066,0.00020834822,0.000025083687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009044756,0.00017238148,0.0020782172,0.00003352592,0.00002619488,0.0000043216737,0.017351871,0.00000608318,0.00010625375,0.58875495,0.38483238,0.006543385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030238903,0.000033813358,0.0057607796,0.00009755182,0.000028859982,7.6239536e-7,0.00521072,0.0000013131114,0.000074927746,0.0018468834,0.9864697,0.0001723321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8489185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98606026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6692603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041150648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056305686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790852331","doi":"","title":"Continuing Legal Education Society of Nova Scotia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Political science; Continuing education; History; Medical education; Medicine; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.02448403297094213,"score_gpt":0.32380065220187115,"score_spread":0.299316619230929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790852331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17823797,0.00026902728,0.000005106163,0.031942718,0.0023208538,0.00024834616,0.000055752964,0.000017424758,0.7869028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894358,0.0018012279,0.0019563586,0.00040730042,0.00042883097,0.000006170423,0.000017519846,0.000010071147,0.005936748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989854,0.000055564775,0.00029989152,0.00015242088,0.00024365715,0.00026305305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983241,0.000080830476,0.000460495,0.00038633792,0.00051835936,0.00022987841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052910944,0.000092181144,0.00015525085,0.0007255143,0.00057867623,0.00017773279,0.00045504989,0.00012132918,0.0004300429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005926211,0.00010278274,0.00014345183,0.0012105305,0.00092934596,0.0009908855,0.000017831593,0.00015740731,0.0000132479245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060325083,0.00010380139,0.21336953,0.000042392072,0.00006314535,4.423733e-7,0.0151583925,3.289976e-7,0.00012933805,0.41050205,0.33661416,0.024010373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007972369,0.0000113780625,0.083717406,0.000035953137,0.000021879232,3.7026618e-7,0.0058679087,3.9132718e-7,0.00005185045,0.00042116927,0.9096871,0.00010485347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9538328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9673454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8111978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041400715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003165914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5616195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790950295","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5043","title":"LAWYER COMPETENCIES FOR ACCESS TO JUSTICE: TWO EMPIRICAL STUDIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Thompson Rivers University; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Framing (construction); Economic Justice; Sociology; Critical reflection; Legal profession; Social justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Law; Pedagogy; Law and economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.34434728378089996,"score_gpt":0.5682591560974322,"score_spread":0.2239118723165322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790950295","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32544437,0.00032235842,0.008867788,0.3291536,0.010818766,0.0039873635,0.00013526884,0.00036341004,0.3209071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437977,0.000042977063,0.014874074,0.029268062,0.004930735,0.0002636582,0.0000072669063,0.00003951067,0.006776015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980772,0.00014064742,0.00043755377,0.0003706281,0.00052974315,0.00044421316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956718,0.0014366627,0.00021938517,0.0003319445,0.0020874573,0.0002527492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001048652,0.00016565289,0.00029560356,0.00027620824,0.0009029241,0.00060738716,0.0011276099,0.00008444491,0.00057222764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006658883,0.00015941825,0.000066323555,0.0013035451,0.00041372492,0.0017374159,0.00031724194,0.00018901222,0.00028375143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039478135,0.00043788375,0.0052349456,0.0004929628,0.0002179402,0.0000024881165,0.09563466,0.0001501601,0.0007325653,0.06935603,0.8209679,0.0063776905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040272958,0.00019062193,0.008534221,0.00009329505,0.00051136006,7.515015e-7,0.022979127,0.000047646674,0.0010379442,0.0011869911,0.964693,0.0003223037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011946992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030023428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6183533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013178673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008165602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79717857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791013172","doi":"","title":"The lawyer's desk book 1986: being a compendium of information useful to the practice of law in Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compendium; Desk; Law; Political science; Library science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.01660905487995269,"score_gpt":0.2792370961637616,"score_spread":0.2626280412838089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791013172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01099017,0.000033820215,0.000019039837,0.06011968,0.00036850976,0.00043873745,0.000022935945,0.0000059624444,0.92800117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98053205,0.00016413162,0.00046776177,0.004439628,0.000082530474,0.000041350395,0.0000053990307,0.00000730995,0.014259836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864495,0.00020569733,0.0004864714,0.00007863006,0.0003363924,0.0002478318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760747,0.0012543012,0.00036073627,0.0002605038,0.00036965188,0.00014734283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014602875,0.00007334666,0.00012421064,0.00022734527,0.00032859168,0.000055070763,0.00037484223,0.00006236346,0.00020062378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017231865,0.000047162073,0.000035230707,0.0004023653,0.00023993253,0.0014134675,0.000022980123,0.0001766433,0.000026268164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020188701,0.000015237983,0.004243247,0.000004626507,0.000014239672,4.6412865e-7,0.041208424,0.000004232707,0.0000070473643,0.93625677,0.015744878,0.0024806599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012541673,0.00002369527,0.011217221,0.00003439689,0.000013135161,7.1911245e-7,0.0029833727,3.4355728e-7,0.000040994724,0.0011538838,0.9843424,0.000064419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003505221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041545075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7369918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791044334","doi":"","title":"Bibliographies on the legal profession and legal education in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Legal education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015604209956927026,"score_gpt":0.28492665315762716,"score_spread":0.26932244320070015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791044334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36047298,0.00005466522,2.9731018e-7,0.11918988,0.0006070522,0.00021556894,0.000025255236,0.000005210476,0.5194291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645546,0.0010698969,0.00002729524,0.0024415655,0.0001496851,0.000036478876,0.0000024784952,0.00000636092,0.031711638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990685,0.00015825173,0.00018992544,0.00012504183,0.00023201513,0.00022625428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908984,0.00037755418,0.000093703464,0.00014351352,0.00010802334,0.00018734013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040365552,0.0000713448,0.000079838996,0.0020565342,0.0002945838,0.000043528653,0.00015350318,0.000045711866,0.00023725978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005057975,0.00004678158,0.000014945179,0.00247333,0.00013403788,0.00045691954,0.000007816585,0.00014571658,0.0000047133717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058034266,0.00001603929,0.041798476,0.0000042100132,0.0000042683114,0.0000018655804,0.0008202335,1.0907023e-7,0.000009917696,0.6789314,0.2549485,0.023459159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056928682,0.0000076006145,0.1106445,0.0000433437,0.0000029742032,6.0644857e-7,0.003892581,1.9334891e-7,0.0000103687635,0.00061904563,0.88465375,0.00006813987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67831236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023820857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02400305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98152995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791098417","doi":"","title":"Labour Relations Code: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on January 21, 1993","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Continuing education; Political science; Code of practice; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Programming language; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.02133920422399733,"score_gpt":0.3285967569542196,"score_spread":0.30725755273022226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791098417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19553258,0.00004180232,0.0000064399046,0.009956141,0.003043646,0.0009998835,0.00034312022,0.00002433212,0.79005206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81923246,0.00008817215,0.0008414376,0.0006524055,0.000531234,0.00023717221,0.000060976283,0.000017370265,0.17833875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987238,0.00011516804,0.00039977307,0.00023084186,0.00020133215,0.00032910236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844146,0.00027501176,0.00041377265,0.00038511062,0.0002597416,0.00022491753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000819809,0.000117076204,0.00019302647,0.00045874732,0.0007960409,0.00023765018,0.0003437359,0.0001455449,0.00030114927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027637377,0.00013836438,0.00004296529,0.00021038187,0.0001289138,0.0009748697,0.000014135353,0.00016202456,0.00001880929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050613657,0.00011937184,0.0065081287,0.000033968587,0.000018217725,0.0000029762732,0.014893554,0.0000055034648,0.000119900884,0.6013636,0.3693631,0.007521033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002369947,0.00002927024,0.016847406,0.00009748994,0.000015394588,4.525949e-7,0.0026926056,0.0000016867106,0.00008848298,0.002634843,0.97720027,0.0001550889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7989725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98438257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6236999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003473261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004703862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83444494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791157298","doi":"","title":"Practice issues for Vancouver Island lawyers : materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Nanaimo, B.C. [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continuing education; Legal education; Law; Political science; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.01521101398445248,"score_gpt":0.32968644301832506,"score_spread":0.3144754290338726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791157298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044702012,0.00030207398,0.00015114028,0.06664838,0.0048775515,0.0033354666,0.0006226111,0.00005198788,0.87930876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6205904,0.00065590057,0.010115854,0.0030982066,0.0018049941,0.0013520544,0.0000590133,0.000058621066,0.36226496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864566,0.00014190101,0.00042076272,0.00023512954,0.0001768923,0.0003796237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978192,0.00096494006,0.00030830948,0.00018342721,0.00053040107,0.00019372866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011549483,0.00011647383,0.00020196282,0.00039699127,0.00021535029,0.00010663881,0.0001910878,0.00012754655,0.00022338987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005348654,0.00010784333,0.000045231176,0.00030157712,0.00009659517,0.0013482814,0.00000796511,0.00006237157,0.000005888519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001337243,0.00008816863,0.00043580282,0.0000571363,0.000027275648,0.0000011756732,0.020342162,4.6599325e-7,0.0006945745,0.21321674,0.7445792,0.020423548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003788014,0.000044453234,0.00021547724,0.00010588249,0.000029645898,7.6437885e-7,0.0081235925,3.517328e-7,0.00045996648,0.0016139928,0.9888654,0.0001617153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68813926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5758884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032975557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041438206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.735096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791195712","doi":"","title":"Canadian Law Information Council. Committee on Public Legal Education and Information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Information governance; Public information; Public administration; Information system; Management information systems","score_opus":0.01929661186311398,"score_gpt":0.25065838866231793,"score_spread":0.23136177679920394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791195712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01094943,0.000050916922,0.0000050247045,0.13714048,0.0010754172,0.00030198524,0.00020517991,0.00003165831,0.85023993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98562986,0.0019325886,0.0002095491,0.010152286,0.00019783992,0.00005486059,0.00010115766,0.0000069444754,0.0017149152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986107,0.00009443335,0.0003639525,0.000098298544,0.0004517188,0.00038091766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763715,0.00014215044,0.00020578115,0.00021278403,0.0010863385,0.000715817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007341339,0.0001209565,0.00011156434,0.0025585697,0.0007662388,0.0003649276,0.0002129337,0.00016011944,0.00032732505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010203858,0.00010753256,0.000041241186,0.0023817865,0.000403267,0.008727432,0.000008076177,0.00013879286,0.0001082351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032135101,0.000011435642,0.0038099787,0.000006676706,0.000009569229,1.0749849e-7,0.003164576,6.691034e-8,7.336441e-7,0.83083504,0.12733364,0.034824938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014247253,0.000028458482,0.009927335,0.000021456162,0.000009062342,0.0000012783385,0.0035251612,3.0453472e-7,0.0000025765855,0.0013739353,0.98481745,0.00015054364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9746804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072880747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015248811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9903338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791493877","doi":"","title":"Human rights in the workplace: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on September [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.023648713451234545,"score_gpt":0.3494829680158425,"score_spread":0.32583425456460796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791493877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28379512,0.000010933642,4.2806388e-7,0.0031359198,0.0011366663,0.00073189253,0.000027004284,0.0000068280633,0.71115524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92965305,0.0000063857124,0.00014886771,0.00050610787,0.000417132,0.00025111446,0.000018027573,0.000008275467,0.06899105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880946,0.00018087619,0.00033376247,0.00018494189,0.00019464278,0.00029629044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890864,0.00021992282,0.00029122838,0.0003565753,0.0001166458,0.00010698758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012228104,0.00010074262,0.00016056758,0.0003509092,0.0007766506,0.00027400476,0.00042907833,0.00011170929,0.00023531006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059560814,0.0000915261,0.00003328727,0.00018924692,0.00011639431,0.0006182045,0.000009101155,0.00016129756,0.000008215871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031283646,0.00013141087,0.0030330636,0.000025738973,0.000008540669,0.0000047134595,0.0271581,0.00000236048,0.000049743347,0.52971226,0.43779138,0.0020514326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022615961,0.000022347265,0.009434762,0.00010758803,0.0000082500055,3.6530588e-7,0.0024215723,4.0678094e-7,0.00005071123,0.0034867218,0.98412645,0.00011468816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8429071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64585793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024194841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014904253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5973447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791581946","doi":"","title":"Report on the administration of justice in Manitoba","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Economic Justice; Administration of justice; Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06644167629417974,"score_gpt":0.3521027447836486,"score_spread":0.2856610684894689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791581946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11648829,0.00000585035,7.462255e-7,0.037841905,0.00051626767,0.00016947907,0.000010956833,0.0000036411438,0.84496284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860214,0.00006463948,0.00008137553,0.00048799886,0.00020799745,0.000014573807,0.0000052465684,0.000004305784,0.013112473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921757,0.00007698283,0.0002584195,0.00009589804,0.00020882486,0.00014228809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881494,0.00023201571,0.0003408642,0.0003707024,0.00014135215,0.00010013333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008532474,0.000048951424,0.0000808937,0.00017663464,0.0004912204,0.00007081017,0.00029461153,0.00005877326,0.00018999167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035529847,0.000043588032,0.000023021079,0.00015638514,0.00018662123,0.00027542375,0.0000070064934,0.00015179071,0.0000116464125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013709803,0.00003550305,0.013435736,0.000011594191,0.0000067025735,0.00003429771,0.0035503106,0.0000011025622,0.000005349599,0.9577908,0.022000082,0.0031148111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004544128,0.00001582394,0.13551532,0.000017414337,0.000012029821,0.000001956855,0.002456722,7.802517e-7,0.000027356766,0.0017195162,0.8601375,0.000050113722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84375525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98882234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95607126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092170856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032208476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5713645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791599261","doi":"","title":"Public law, 1988-1989: the Law Society of Upper Canada bar admission course materials","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Course (navigation); Political science; Bar (unit); Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.03525702729177126,"score_gpt":0.2881913378253722,"score_spread":0.25293431053360094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791599261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019146768,0.00008813688,0.0000019224215,0.21724021,0.0009368087,0.00027224916,0.00029713375,0.000015282665,0.7620015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96802026,0.00032788733,0.00015333307,0.0060578287,0.0003487863,0.000023531691,0.000014856427,0.000015500107,0.025038023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840224,0.00020942584,0.00037861662,0.00016555333,0.00044363082,0.00040055314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825126,0.00035186886,0.00024706183,0.00032146016,0.00037040387,0.00045797272],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008428751,0.000113129085,0.00017665024,0.000050165225,0.00070683623,0.000072192845,0.00040741617,0.00011326591,0.003442246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003819375,0.000076644275,0.00006117659,0.00032054487,0.00048215684,0.00048438323,0.000021303995,0.000116974385,0.000015194676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024480223,0.000014139825,0.00086960837,0.000008149508,0.000021339447,6.366089e-7,0.001611054,7.605358e-8,0.00013030859,0.79529804,0.20077999,0.0012642349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011949028,0.000009061119,0.0024930635,0.000024606044,0.000018183244,7.606429e-7,0.0015042424,1.267423e-7,0.00036640922,0.0012629436,0.99408627,0.00011483943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99939287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94887346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000311196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013890587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99746877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791717686","doi":"","title":"CLE research guide, volume 2: index to Continuing Legal Education 1991 publications of the Law Society of Upper Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Index (typography); Political science; Legal education; Volume (thermodynamics)","score_opus":0.03150154415206753,"score_gpt":0.3419835860847871,"score_spread":0.31048204193271955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791717686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04757666,0.000035436417,0.0000063169923,0.19190058,0.000551505,0.0004381964,0.00012407183,0.000007638583,0.7593596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84425336,0.000047338326,0.00036660006,0.0011547952,0.00018078921,0.00004730572,0.0000069269986,0.000009841776,0.15393306],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820226,0.0002190432,0.0004406226,0.00016975436,0.0006226206,0.0003457122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971679,0.0003202414,0.00022130321,0.00041346837,0.0015586545,0.00031845426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012377921,0.00007424592,0.00013550844,0.00021366464,0.00041506,0.00004657644,0.00053741137,0.00008692927,0.00041306313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016875097,0.000059211372,0.00006419369,0.0014283501,0.00037002278,0.00046295038,0.00003928856,0.00020774896,0.0000064394694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014841771,0.000021348927,0.02584822,0.000006961906,0.000009632874,2.2597867e-8,0.0033212102,6.0648836e-7,0.00006857811,0.46957672,0.49684158,0.0043036435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006093851,0.000007728786,0.05004306,0.00004698739,0.000006402502,2.7670018e-7,0.005045906,7.1038073e-7,0.000071567265,0.00066562695,0.9439798,0.000070988295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7966767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063310907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025312768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9802128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791775069","doi":"","title":"Index to Canadian legal literature, 2001-2007: an index and bibliography of Canadian legal literature classified according to Library [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Library science; Bibliography; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02083437962920314,"score_gpt":0.28316349132797813,"score_spread":0.262329111698775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791775069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069000706,0.00031577644,0.000005907992,0.08979614,0.0014076802,0.0008274668,0.0016898437,0.000049116617,0.8369074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606826,0.0016079319,0.0007633768,0.013559545,0.0010101636,0.000058099693,0.00010906129,0.0000599732,0.022149296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706596,0.00023473783,0.0005676134,0.00052496034,0.00044184932,0.0011648835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99324083,0.00018532938,0.00017969456,0.00050142646,0.00053843897,0.0053542694],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006229459,0.00030695833,0.00036823106,0.040488143,0.0006457269,0.0008927099,0.0006698419,0.00043875605,0.00061627466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005178156,0.0002899608,0.000094466945,0.025385873,0.00021024107,0.0035824494,0.00003322074,0.0004914754,0.000018961247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043838307,0.000029034394,0.106840976,0.000025844321,0.00005100332,0.00007719484,0.0069853445,0.0000023635907,0.000043948534,0.15629795,0.72239673,0.0072057666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021752226,0.0000700752,0.06549099,0.00019205842,0.000015713296,0.0000070857836,0.0013761383,0.0000011803949,0.000014029789,0.000512238,0.9317335,0.00036948582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89168185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025633164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014368489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791802331","doi":"","title":"Employment law, 1999: materials prepared for the Continuing Legal Education seminar, Employment law '99 held in Vancouver, B.C. on [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Labour law; Legal education; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.028089738049438744,"score_gpt":0.33538773696452345,"score_spread":0.3072979989150847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791802331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049438618,0.00013180159,0.000005147533,0.018001378,0.005524265,0.0018431284,0.00016400621,0.000029759056,0.9248619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93640447,0.00017453515,0.00025454667,0.002956091,0.0007219502,0.00053415255,0.000031787782,0.000024749812,0.058897737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998443,0.00012884002,0.000442058,0.00026220316,0.00030669686,0.00041718897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982424,0.00037328908,0.00040540335,0.0005498035,0.00020605455,0.00022304825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010697294,0.00015183525,0.00021292479,0.00018778055,0.0010779424,0.00042639353,0.0005395326,0.00011509389,0.0002455165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006847733,0.00014026018,0.000058412545,0.00012912891,0.00026924053,0.00070844486,0.000026937258,0.00015502852,0.000011537322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040978488,0.00010145612,0.0005429921,0.00001575947,0.000022220418,0.0000016527983,0.011068966,0.0000037702553,0.00006304438,0.8492925,0.13097256,0.007874062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025497162,0.000049995746,0.0017365662,0.00009243557,0.000026076197,4.1471966e-7,0.0025371762,9.3627614e-7,0.00037655866,0.0019101478,0.99284863,0.00016607916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.952346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99516064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8869658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044483898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024144799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82907706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792019768","doi":"","title":"Public Legal Education Society of Nova Scotia. Libraries Committee","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Political science; Library science; Public administration; Sociology; Engineering; Ethnology; Aeronautics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04068192296092537,"score_gpt":0.2874115292196249,"score_spread":0.2467296062586995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792019768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03933874,0.00052829576,0.000025491852,0.23981607,0.0019031502,0.00028411826,0.00013368523,0.00004400743,0.71792644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832043,0.003310783,0.0028920185,0.0015856817,0.00047245066,0.000014068943,0.000030645446,0.000016477568,0.008473578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986743,0.00012448388,0.00037239597,0.00017442246,0.00031081185,0.00034361496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828094,0.00027031935,0.0002700297,0.00028221484,0.0005637455,0.00033274782],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046347096,0.00011412657,0.0001664706,0.0013203858,0.0003049121,0.00011426602,0.0003820551,0.00014802058,0.0013711164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054415467,0.00009811654,0.00015026964,0.0045426264,0.0012275629,0.0017641851,0.00001943546,0.00012404405,0.000027042424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023154748,0.000060693135,0.071247175,0.00001321213,0.000030172167,9.263285e-8,0.0024929023,1.634157e-8,0.000043913824,0.5222525,0.3932607,0.010596305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100267454,0.000019412217,0.02589227,0.00002822129,0.000015395177,4.585369e-7,0.00449445,6.469221e-8,0.0000646809,0.0029012235,0.9663543,0.00012927444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76950586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90717775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94386554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006638868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007990033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792037548","doi":"","title":"Justice Canada : serving Canadians.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.031196754232270342,"score_gpt":0.2939731342241911,"score_spread":0.2627763799919207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792037548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009696122,0.00004522772,0.0000061293085,0.120177686,0.0012786207,0.00014793358,0.0001243402,0.000018165088,0.8685058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86037797,0.0002081956,0.00023108358,0.0058121053,0.00053472316,0.000019595824,0.000008453555,0.00001867915,0.13278922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998629,0.00010493364,0.00026758955,0.00017322696,0.00032751026,0.0004977674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816304,0.00037083565,0.00012402494,0.00024196353,0.00028337783,0.0008167421],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038339818,0.00010028931,0.0001276129,0.00034265433,0.0005096822,0.000044338558,0.00033310978,0.000081387894,0.0019278789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013944134,0.00009126785,0.00002765334,0.00064697856,0.00011415948,0.0004231307,0.0000100812995,0.00013226374,0.00002506703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024310293,0.0000069339258,0.0068230308,0.00001588641,0.000017795397,0.000017419947,0.0033821468,0.0000010235467,0.000010461629,0.51541156,0.45826876,0.016042577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000842619,0.000004772688,0.0076671727,0.000019432662,0.000024285526,8.9109574e-7,0.0019546528,2.8922454e-7,0.0000067255014,0.00048398055,0.98960894,0.00014459525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85068184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010141531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03657787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792052333","doi":"","title":"Accommodating ethnic and cultural factors in damages for personal injury","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Damages; Personal injury; Political science; Sociology; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.13304648849849282,"score_gpt":0.4523207221508023,"score_spread":0.3192742336523095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792052333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97430223,0.00003871663,0.0001732069,0.018163403,0.000036151894,0.00015008358,0.000012374415,0.000012011018,0.007111803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953306,0.00012570417,0.0006620778,0.000021941027,0.000031609645,1.4729059e-7,0.000009777733,0.0000024059204,0.0038157867],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993208,0.000097066215,0.000052425363,0.00010295191,0.0002134684,0.00021326319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894994,0.00068435527,0.00005527772,0.00004391753,0.00017997925,0.00008650874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014988586,0.00003919337,0.0000742485,0.00019256803,0.00044419224,0.000036473215,0.00012029837,0.00006222922,0.00014959202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008097041,0.00004300285,0.000024307908,0.0005184736,0.00026697887,0.0007066317,0.000043207816,0.00023223614,0.0000023114917],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033593975,0.00016540904,0.30900028,0.0000746946,0.00003786572,0.0000052574806,0.6177659,8.0023153e-7,0.0026875613,0.022975117,0.01490646,0.032044698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003800044,0.00005475011,0.3517718,0.000020965324,0.000005265261,2.4595823e-7,0.5687879,0.00007157364,0.00008965065,0.00025821367,0.078467466,0.00009220503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017118692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041954216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06356101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081843704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024830757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792117849","doi":"","title":"Journal - Canadian Bar Association.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.020581908933639967,"score_gpt":0.2848078723028718,"score_spread":0.2642259633692318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792117849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050083348,0.000047330952,0.0000048340758,0.13963594,0.0012823496,0.00011398214,0.00007348634,0.0000137991365,0.85381997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6603306,0.0009599745,0.00045932666,0.004255074,0.0014389402,0.000014373717,0.000007102302,0.000021558182,0.33251306],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846214,0.00017900813,0.0003089157,0.00012243396,0.0003737949,0.00055368897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754524,0.00032265042,0.00022783324,0.00015272976,0.000509951,0.0012415856],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012009853,0.000086379194,0.00012476213,0.00080360135,0.00080512266,0.00013516637,0.00029763728,0.00015355312,0.0058238213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032228846,0.00007554306,0.000058322363,0.00053787977,0.000087247914,0.000718209,0.0000052137907,0.00023186713,0.00030955032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015234824,0.000008972317,0.048615623,0.00000178558,0.00003083371,0.000009299462,0.0039468776,2.7018365e-7,0.0000064883743,0.34710398,0.5859285,0.0143458685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118409895,0.000008921399,0.02035123,0.000014050985,0.0000131492925,0.0000024707342,0.0006623656,8.5714156e-8,0.0000036404513,0.0027295498,0.9759805,0.00011558032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99053293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99929374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65532225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001981905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019588875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792118970","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association. Alberta Branch. Mid-winter Meeting.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Geography; Meteorology; Psychology","score_opus":0.016132380556503838,"score_gpt":0.2844367363048786,"score_spread":0.26830435574837475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792118970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020328632,0.00012227707,3.416759e-7,0.17966382,0.0020350546,0.00021508354,0.00012921082,0.000017608083,0.797488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92894596,0.0019477255,0.00020338,0.0023709564,0.00071681815,0.000030472462,0.000038193677,0.00002279418,0.06572372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998161,0.00014506298,0.00035596828,0.00025596796,0.00037438495,0.00070759334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972129,0.0003149138,0.00044064168,0.0005368535,0.00051361846,0.0009810594],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090011716,0.00015578908,0.00020528462,0.0018859634,0.0025086447,0.0005127279,0.0007935524,0.0002637009,0.0021983823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004499972,0.00017681431,0.00014624426,0.0013426524,0.00037034482,0.0009719734,0.000020684216,0.00027812933,0.00017636255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002977658,0.000018664681,0.47735468,0.0000074558548,0.00007639459,0.000002932866,0.007197324,3.9552e-7,0.000005468927,0.052479006,0.46098524,0.0018694856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115468385,0.000009829915,0.100171335,0.000019757446,0.000029536695,3.6921347e-7,0.0012674498,2.76535e-7,0.000010366589,0.00077139883,0.89741015,0.00019407559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99940807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9086173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050581596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052612214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792288245","doi":"","title":"Ethics, Legal Professionalism and Reconciliation: Enacting Reconciliation Through Civility","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Sociology; Law; Legal ethics; Economic Justice; Harassment; Political science","score_opus":0.24842312770623612,"score_gpt":0.4922463388024223,"score_spread":0.24382321109618618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792288245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5417547,0.0040391567,0.00036351496,0.37476897,0.008422394,0.00032204294,0.000011226614,0.00006613156,0.07025182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876165,0.0012998751,0.0022430092,0.0032841924,0.002221507,0.0000057809684,0.0000017876173,0.000010002651,0.0033173952],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974713,0.00071341865,0.00070600066,0.00017818516,0.0006995849,0.00023155857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99368876,0.0015310943,0.0009786229,0.00011804652,0.0036089988,0.00007450362],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00589672,0.00012822103,0.0002800985,0.00009353657,0.0020221688,0.00024910658,0.00017150576,0.00014878293,0.0001703742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016677136,0.00010841477,0.00006786311,0.0004834953,0.0006640739,0.0034059696,0.000058227037,0.0010393899,0.000017010556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022615227,0.00025709457,0.009926248,0.000099343684,0.0004824761,0.000017164883,0.59454167,0.0000034125621,0.00033065828,0.30956125,0.064955294,0.01959925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032160277,0.00012330724,0.0042625833,0.000112092,0.00005248805,0.000026352722,0.071225375,0.0000039753636,0.00020209375,0.0076562567,0.9158714,0.00014250181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002367014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057937023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8509161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000275228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018026757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792340284","doi":"","title":"Labour relations: current issues: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C., on December 10 [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continuing education; Current (fluid); Political science; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Medical education; Medicine; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.026882840501317666,"score_gpt":0.3626860527811474,"score_spread":0.33580321227982973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792340284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14438161,0.0002641381,0.000006322806,0.009232105,0.0057734684,0.0013414589,0.00020505236,0.00003067092,0.8387652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7103073,0.0003837956,0.0009379341,0.00038569397,0.001007561,0.00039485167,0.00006893563,0.000025338888,0.2864886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869454,0.000117396106,0.00041431593,0.00023506407,0.00021677946,0.00032188726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984159,0.00021943299,0.00041488366,0.00037662243,0.00036113203,0.00021202215],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007824933,0.00012191995,0.00019406008,0.00044291376,0.0006318389,0.00027898388,0.00032117733,0.00012030211,0.0009295624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003652851,0.00013998413,0.000042566713,0.0002025247,0.000107463624,0.0009868625,0.000014031906,0.0001517412,0.000038630107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050388102,0.00014019436,0.0034780127,0.00004680316,0.000014085372,0.0000012760737,0.014217836,0.00000344903,0.00003386235,0.42537642,0.5341034,0.022534272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023017934,0.00002559541,0.005580315,0.00016179628,0.00001449657,2.5362698e-7,0.0019199727,0.0000013870125,0.00006216561,0.002596351,0.98925126,0.00015623402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68601394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97575164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5659257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003517024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042109373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792349664","doi":"","title":"McGill University. Law Library","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Law library; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01656418853008553,"score_gpt":0.2389202118176139,"score_spread":0.22235602328752835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792349664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004339034,0.000052026353,0.0000013119146,0.10103858,0.00046912636,0.00010161156,0.00042419013,0.000052554136,0.89352155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8531623,0.013374497,0.0012073395,0.0034370262,0.00039754307,0.0000044672784,0.000021591599,0.000024267314,0.128371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922043,0.00010448043,0.0001305479,0.0001354416,0.00015059492,0.00025852583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991306,0.00018705655,0.00008234871,0.0001638512,0.0000953837,0.00034078004],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001473663,0.00006954347,0.00008445096,0.0013012991,0.00049960695,0.000020583158,0.00026854835,0.000093816096,0.0016687147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011345214,0.000061595536,0.00006548457,0.0032902188,0.00051194784,0.0012288147,0.000013903276,0.00007225949,0.000062265055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003546791,0.000011511018,0.0038154966,0.0000020403002,0.000012138651,0.0000031933037,0.0005520372,1.6535502e-8,0.000010393207,0.8368627,0.1552766,0.0034503588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094515985,0.000011761006,0.0027563144,0.000011387197,0.000010280605,3.0017935e-7,0.0014139912,1.4893452e-8,0.00002112761,0.002628038,0.99295074,0.00010152126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70614064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.922979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84882325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005433587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086822256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992439},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2792382089","doi":"","title":"Student learning guide: a workbook to accompany Canadian law, fourth edition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workbook; Library science; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.024935021043241305,"score_gpt":0.32473435956603647,"score_spread":0.29979933852279517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792382089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008138895,0.000024165087,0.000047986792,0.05593738,0.0010816121,0.00039806115,0.000039133585,0.00004298194,0.9342898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8310089,0.0001408349,0.0008186311,0.0060922843,0.0011611998,0.00008237201,0.000016650445,0.00002762643,0.16065149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815077,0.00018526171,0.00036734037,0.000251507,0.00040876077,0.000636374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975774,0.0002624178,0.00013623213,0.00024201484,0.0003549813,0.0014269366],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007847234,0.00013490564,0.00017085226,0.00081357936,0.00081029296,0.00014128575,0.00038395723,0.00012474558,0.002189759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094675267,0.00012692634,0.000054692642,0.00071014353,0.00014493252,0.00060564175,0.000018322302,0.00022258787,0.0003764964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044413996,0.000021072243,0.013957577,0.0000042897436,0.000028287242,0.000011838552,0.012663744,0.000010235925,0.000018437797,0.66574544,0.2785327,0.029001923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000125618,0.000024906967,0.013427523,0.00004418757,0.000013583365,9.550745e-7,0.0019920426,3.8923932e-7,0.000006841131,0.000727819,0.9834487,0.0001874352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99265355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010671983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007586473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792438641","doi":"","title":"The Manitoba law journal and law reports.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022141107956895986,"score_gpt":0.28425493097171955,"score_spread":0.26211382301482355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792438641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053979876,0.00017239188,0.0000023426092,0.06095397,0.0009122005,0.00010715726,0.0000071853565,0.000010311077,0.93243647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628085,0.0018618901,0.00021789857,0.0027645251,0.0007888672,0.000012289319,0.0000011711043,0.000012110985,0.031532742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990275,0.00011154675,0.0002695913,0.00009920878,0.00022818102,0.00026397387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873614,0.00034234053,0.00018711468,0.00016665929,0.00021316866,0.00035456909],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009944958,0.00006165546,0.00007625705,0.00009645122,0.0016240345,0.00019896864,0.00014765313,0.00006032126,0.00019076132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005657857,0.000039514107,0.000028403321,0.00017422595,0.0005229887,0.00050131365,0.000010096087,0.0001545029,0.000013196308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015476564,0.0000035739527,0.0009972437,0.0000011011145,0.000008458044,0.000012243721,0.0011611723,1.516841e-8,0.000006623684,0.95463365,0.029848758,0.013325613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005281786,0.000009089306,0.0013064151,0.000012450301,0.000009100228,0.000028015424,0.0020510945,2.5643441e-8,0.000007739436,0.02646525,0.9699928,0.00006516135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89818853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99693537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9574105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013023327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001477181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792554088","doi":"","title":"Canadian directory of public legal information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Business; Internet privacy; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.02863444638895851,"score_gpt":0.29121139873166135,"score_spread":0.26257695234270284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792554088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015590479,0.00003278712,0.000010110001,0.045230437,0.0006178723,0.00016952667,0.00013711973,0.00001759079,0.9381941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708586,0.00021325434,0.00016680466,0.0010333067,0.00016467963,0.00001655633,0.000019944142,0.0000072625107,0.027519623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882114,0.00011337986,0.0003414226,0.0000851064,0.00026727794,0.00037168828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982916,0.00016801449,0.00018916221,0.00019026994,0.00043570934,0.0007252476],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006752641,0.00007653859,0.00011976935,0.0011928104,0.00026031074,0.000069280126,0.00024777476,0.00010043708,0.0016178577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016095372,0.000069024434,0.000041471565,0.00071591267,0.00017478997,0.0022319523,0.0000064979968,0.0001012682,0.000080202575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001610638,0.000007992412,0.015357306,0.000007930537,0.000014482037,9.916814e-7,0.0037460774,1.5413985e-7,0.00001330769,0.8495683,0.07888567,0.05239619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085722786,0.000008306649,0.018533487,0.000012761622,0.000006279839,5.039411e-7,0.0007710194,2.1324547e-7,0.000016733644,0.0005860513,0.9798848,0.00009411723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99690574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99950826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060766406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017279325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792669608","doi":"","title":"SETTLEMENT COUNSEL: AN INNOVATIVE STRATEGY FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION OF COMMERCIAL LITIGATION FILES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Negotiation; Accountability; Incentive; Construct (python library); Work (physics); Dispute resolution; Political science; Law; Business; Law and economics; Public relations; Engineering; Economics; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.06023909209695339,"score_gpt":0.4041586855270993,"score_spread":0.34391959343014594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792669608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55453074,0.0018438194,0.05760501,0.3315803,0.002007009,0.0027316287,0.00013383458,0.00005687273,0.049510755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99652076,0.0016505198,0.00027128024,0.00014878383,0.00030682233,0.00002025253,0.000012327346,0.0000042902366,0.0010649693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990126,0.000101153775,0.00018065727,0.000076136836,0.00019813106,0.0004313042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989574,0.000106119165,0.0003722251,0.00012646559,0.00041203978,0.000025771138],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003447188,0.000048679405,0.00005685787,0.000046646146,0.0023837632,0.0002900834,0.00022112443,0.00003246096,0.000028563452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017450129,0.00003843023,0.00001735424,0.00011074884,0.00020310022,0.0007506838,0.0000128153415,0.00045421044,8.2700024e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029271348,0.000037298752,0.0005075087,0.0000034719149,0.00006425553,4.1789477e-8,0.0043635047,0.000008353045,0.000012160992,0.9329629,0.00063885783,0.06137235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008973253,0.0003963673,0.062856264,0.000025627263,0.00009282371,0.000006925292,0.104542345,0.00019786863,0.00004853757,0.54443717,0.28634354,0.00015521252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012552924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010538022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44199002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022628094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016646966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792948099","doi":"","title":"Employment law: human rights in the workplace: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Human rights; Labour law; Legal education; Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.024716819340825,"score_gpt":0.34653067121736647,"score_spread":0.3218138518765415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792948099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29253116,0.000027554312,7.643169e-7,0.005790386,0.0013543242,0.0010171699,0.000037059002,0.000009268929,0.6992323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612548,0.00001515659,0.0002141076,0.0005503687,0.00039704758,0.0003435627,0.000024813495,0.000008562115,0.03719159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998725,0.00017730628,0.00038099836,0.00018835743,0.00020404927,0.00032430104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888885,0.0001960198,0.0003029165,0.00036563323,0.00012811284,0.00011845943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013252049,0.00010270144,0.0001705126,0.0002798816,0.0009451767,0.0003342334,0.00049106195,0.00010298397,0.00012464897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000426558,0.000095378186,0.00003318266,0.00016773268,0.00015733176,0.000763046,0.000013355206,0.00014073458,0.0000034954721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019409747,0.00009693622,0.0022585525,0.000018337449,0.0000070643246,0.0000033235813,0.028060105,9.280472e-7,0.000048275244,0.87784195,0.09037447,0.0012706346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023816554,0.000019976369,0.0052026864,0.00009003565,0.000010284182,4.314041e-7,0.0029037572,2.720868e-7,0.00007753968,0.006306844,0.9850305,0.00011956383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9627106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.894656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002851106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015393036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72696304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792983282","doi":"","title":"Employment law and practice: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on November 22, 1989","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Political science; Practice of law; Legal practice; Sociology; Legal profession","score_opus":0.02524264101382983,"score_gpt":0.35242386199202486,"score_spread":0.327181220978195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792983282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046576306,0.000047146368,0.00000229968,0.010836188,0.0019153653,0.0008589177,0.00008058495,0.000013239404,0.93966997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93040085,0.00019022069,0.0015425602,0.0048402306,0.0006094835,0.00029486525,0.000029345296,0.000024193998,0.062068257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883586,0.00012646648,0.00032327807,0.00022677897,0.00019842017,0.00028916638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983718,0.00046125037,0.00039604426,0.00029907352,0.00025410065,0.00021777698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010732043,0.00011113663,0.00017792135,0.00023090355,0.000576128,0.0003418434,0.00020682994,0.00010974259,0.00013501677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029865243,0.00012508244,0.000024975414,0.00010416979,0.0001659844,0.0012369277,0.00001701613,0.000116760166,0.0000048460297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012293232,0.0001669222,0.0006375112,0.000038316044,0.000022543902,0.0000040022846,0.013476204,8.8638166e-7,0.00019352206,0.8025862,0.17256314,0.010187803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029753457,0.000045942877,0.0014000305,0.00008738543,0.000021816233,0.000001196067,0.0035425476,5.0051455e-7,0.00015191271,0.0011559381,0.99315274,0.00014246465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8512503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97614366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8838245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025092388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024421639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5100714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793060235","doi":"10.7202/1043165ar","title":"Follow the Drinking Gourd: Our Road to Teaching Critical Race Theory and Slavery and the Law, Contemplatively, at McGill","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Gourd; Race (biology); Law; Critical race theory; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.059374484762862896,"score_gpt":0.406693800985672,"score_spread":0.3473193162228091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793060235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028329147,0.000109589666,0.00008035055,0.3827903,0.001087759,0.00023018963,0.000016522004,0.000020180987,0.58733594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903024,0.000048212,0.0002794802,0.006000291,0.00041895427,0.000009556948,3.3366894e-7,0.000010598588,0.0029301844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755365,0.0014154844,0.00023891158,0.00016510053,0.00034607513,0.00028079524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720883,0.0019603346,0.00023278724,0.00023030538,0.00019091886,0.00017681706],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008146728,0.000111749985,0.00015920216,0.000028136248,0.04849325,0.0011801341,0.00039575194,0.00006639016,0.000053088766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070866193,0.000065347944,0.000060019593,0.0000500349,0.0007358598,0.0012606208,0.00018727384,0.0009115612,0.00002311929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091766095,0.000016638978,0.0001948553,0.0000014671864,0.000032316708,0.000005301843,0.006608227,6.7451094e-7,0.000020471147,0.98826295,0.0008448888,0.0039204406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005738221,0.000021444781,0.0014049638,0.000036051202,0.000047893158,0.0001084286,0.016821504,0.000009258099,0.000024706123,0.041766796,0.9390673,0.00011783995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008401516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03211715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96197325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009629121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032443335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793147541","doi":"","title":"Collective bargaining: materials prepared for a continuing legal education seminar and workshop held in Vancouver, B.C. on April 29 [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collective bargaining; Political science; Continuing education; Library science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Engineering; Media studies; Sociology; Medical education; Law; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.029028308305202,"score_gpt":0.3334812453784956,"score_spread":0.30445293707329363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793147541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14538851,0.00004865231,0.0000046091036,0.004082299,0.0015882687,0.0008761146,0.00006279933,0.000013797242,0.84793496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9015444,0.00008072745,0.0005675291,0.00047068787,0.00036958835,0.00019802942,0.000013424222,0.000014047953,0.09674154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989732,0.00009550729,0.00027614261,0.00022307795,0.00014631523,0.00028576556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986574,0.00037629768,0.00030246633,0.00023850985,0.00021677093,0.00020854786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007372736,0.00010494983,0.00019166515,0.00038429143,0.0006752744,0.00028544504,0.00021449046,0.0001217554,0.0001020437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036666081,0.00012147035,0.000024892714,0.00018486967,0.00014879803,0.00064600154,0.000014928862,0.00012668052,0.0000020916395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025631537,0.00018892862,0.009153883,0.000063091764,0.00004974453,0.000006270441,0.13211161,0.000003706424,0.00024721,0.47336337,0.3428218,0.04173404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003170183,0.000039806248,0.00596052,0.00012461397,0.000014691709,5.050279e-7,0.0077725775,0.0000018872752,0.00013252941,0.0032765432,0.98220193,0.00015740277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56609493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96303713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7561559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042391382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006785929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793188166","doi":"","title":"Anger's digest of Canadian law.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Anger; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.031852678353316774,"score_gpt":0.2905271906646033,"score_spread":0.2586745123112865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793188166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013560792,0.00005176988,8.4241384e-7,0.03709971,0.0005461276,0.00017889438,0.00019122721,0.000014400651,0.9483562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512082,0.000369675,0.00017221697,0.0014662531,0.00027727123,0.000014436399,0.000009929034,0.000013976023,0.046468068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879825,0.00009516662,0.0002940283,0.00015093929,0.00023954023,0.00042208363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828005,0.00022485957,0.00014919706,0.00025027394,0.0002859447,0.0008096881],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043712487,0.00009183396,0.0001518888,0.001155088,0.0003151239,0.000033631546,0.00029228439,0.00012085309,0.001793606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062698295,0.00008179965,0.00004920477,0.0010340167,0.00033830124,0.00046591507,0.00000733892,0.000109519475,0.000063948624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019450888,0.000010660457,0.005244864,0.0000050615636,0.000012795462,0.000004717984,0.0032256115,1.2973979e-7,0.000048697704,0.94031185,0.0464826,0.0046510934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094838135,0.0000139841595,0.0083173625,0.000023700983,0.00001115391,8.175972e-7,0.0006630245,3.825486e-8,0.00007340322,0.0017683817,0.9889177,0.00011559906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9424351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029798382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008070956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793226504","doi":"10.29173/alr2458","title":"Access to Justice Online: Are Canadian Court Websites Accessible for Users With Visual Impairments?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Manitoba; Dalhousie University; McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Internet privacy; Public relations; Web accessibility; Political science; Legal research; Business; Sociology; Law; The Internet; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.07519737862806318,"score_gpt":0.46644438941291316,"score_spread":0.39124701078484997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793226504","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014589798,0.0020769078,0.0001076294,0.70776117,0.0014292407,0.0035365259,0.00008857094,0.00006609586,0.27034405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5696287,0.0045554573,0.0030336394,0.39596602,0.0022448485,0.0006654377,0.00021794853,0.000068899004,0.023619054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883634,0.000099871315,0.00023454882,0.00024168883,0.00021358204,0.00037398815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810064,0.00045075602,0.0001757921,0.00021108119,0.0006785698,0.00038317242],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048929267,0.00011940515,0.00019613332,0.00006581035,0.0010207753,0.00047050873,0.0004613776,0.000052908228,0.0022460013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014690948,0.00009921051,0.000039711067,0.0010446936,0.00013387184,0.0013944835,0.000027273081,0.000116703806,0.00040215527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029088982,0.0002409784,0.011238945,0.0010358373,0.0000899303,0.0000022356737,0.0027106444,0.0000011302226,0.0000026996413,0.121337526,0.8588912,0.0044197724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009863884,0.00006760431,0.0015640137,0.0007192153,0.00016379388,0.0000015230054,0.00062151294,0.0000042443567,0.0000054334987,0.000050394454,0.9965425,0.0001611252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66234654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98273724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55503887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016025534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017591723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793369440","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Association (psychology); Geography; Philosophy; Meteorology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.013849189390868799,"score_gpt":0.26834572320452066,"score_spread":0.25449653381365184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793369440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016204221,0.00009449651,0.000002606807,0.2094624,0.0012238312,0.00017590556,0.00018713989,0.000031208278,0.7726182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94455826,0.004762885,0.0003173178,0.0019604024,0.00053910713,0.000029249572,0.00001928638,0.00001671713,0.047796793],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858636,0.00014272731,0.00025405514,0.00016513695,0.00031183226,0.00053989346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814564,0.0002779711,0.00016489935,0.00019175373,0.00041478686,0.0008049776],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007420811,0.00009587322,0.00012081302,0.0025720254,0.00054760464,0.00007353811,0.00026151296,0.0001911542,0.0026655223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016090331,0.00008506151,0.00008022302,0.0034014508,0.00017871098,0.0006065838,0.0000055190585,0.000115504714,0.00019438096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018319555,0.00001231776,0.25645402,0.0000029163161,0.00003674911,0.0000021418368,0.0028926053,6.881977e-8,0.000017898104,0.29009154,0.44227824,0.00820966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008855128,0.000010142217,0.051280394,0.000011085865,0.000014445479,2.1816977e-7,0.0010856461,4.8892527e-8,0.000008855195,0.0014103702,0.94596213,0.00012809694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.928354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075795816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061678668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793553894","doi":"","title":"A legal collection for non-legal libraries in British Columbia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.016039180437182003,"score_gpt":0.2684259712689999,"score_spread":0.2523867908318179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793553894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085072,0.000029752637,0.00003448329,0.018369384,0.0010011593,0.0006578993,0.00014172042,0.000029424691,0.89466417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72564584,0.00017110106,0.000919839,0.0008054639,0.00039412154,0.00016721398,0.000012983627,0.000016548409,0.2718669],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989521,0.00007011765,0.00028619607,0.00017678877,0.00016949874,0.00034529495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990474,0.00030633243,0.000109692046,0.00011499389,0.0001782338,0.00024335695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004054576,0.000058505153,0.00013965023,0.00028381875,0.0004471223,0.0004413771,0.00017298205,0.000115227376,0.0007236401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011296639,0.0000836799,0.000045193767,0.00075727527,0.00017995626,0.0012660165,0.000008026687,0.000105193714,0.000010141485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015640582,0.000059663635,0.05092694,0.000019535595,0.000018465915,0.000011915845,0.003832254,3.130327e-7,0.000021835296,0.21544875,0.70090914,0.028735546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032076606,0.000029332616,0.040206566,0.00003664411,0.0000067046653,0.0000022332854,0.0008714786,0.0000012066647,0.000005067006,0.0023138039,0.9560867,0.00011948461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64057386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002735635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007280472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793587972","doi":"","title":"A catalogue of law books prepared with especial reference to the requirements of the legal profession of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal profession","score_opus":0.034704034200687794,"score_gpt":0.3013796978057987,"score_spread":0.2666756636051109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793587972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12256529,0.000014047881,0.0000030065241,0.021341402,0.00041172208,0.0005934074,0.00034364656,0.0000040427185,0.85472345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97859275,0.000010762521,0.00008642223,0.0005058227,0.000079725774,0.000026274061,0.00000547234,0.0000071690038,0.020685626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985343,0.00017839995,0.00038601123,0.00013307789,0.00053053885,0.00023765062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998442,0.00017759853,0.000399233,0.00037718486,0.00043644736,0.00016755481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047609082,0.00008384746,0.00016101099,0.00009624675,0.00027067325,0.000010768881,0.00049248955,0.000055116638,0.00012815883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005099481,0.00004574092,0.00002726182,0.00038802144,0.00034487777,0.00022323188,0.000032487478,0.00010499527,9.038939e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000639261,0.00003249089,0.0034507548,0.000026702717,0.000033103963,9.752578e-7,0.012953653,0.0000017868825,0.0002759293,0.9300069,0.051486168,0.0016676006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001451536,0.000041394604,0.00798042,0.000120981145,0.000017831064,4.2050803e-7,0.0015884712,8.290521e-8,0.0008859768,0.00037141342,0.98877484,0.00007303095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99986833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93728864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002235002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015279553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9903029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793755744","doi":"","title":"Law Society of Saskatchewan. Libraries.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029728194085609037,"score_gpt":0.2975015452332353,"score_spread":0.26777335114762624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793755744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012912577,0.00026944515,0.0000030228314,0.04399267,0.0008428733,0.00017684668,0.000120114164,0.000023543733,0.9416589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836491,0.0036381187,0.0029449782,0.0012427501,0.00034379415,0.000013840341,0.00001834223,0.000013371188,0.008135737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989829,0.0000554941,0.00027361984,0.0001448732,0.00025516062,0.0002879369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985252,0.00012024264,0.0003557416,0.0004574478,0.00026014104,0.00028121046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041337588,0.000092910705,0.00016566142,0.00034449497,0.0012644957,0.00018548773,0.0005750065,0.00014747863,0.0004903372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026268803,0.000099014556,0.00016130548,0.0011398717,0.0020617072,0.0011346817,0.0000273995,0.0001598461,0.000008225701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041878884,0.000036493726,0.025016334,0.000022812128,0.000056199668,6.830105e-7,0.026871009,1.9575349e-7,0.000023279663,0.76090837,0.18449058,0.00256984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092955415,0.000013225958,0.0135269845,0.000013164601,0.000018333145,1.6385475e-7,0.014819532,3.135321e-7,0.00006120522,0.004357298,0.96698815,0.00010865145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9453638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97419685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9707365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026113714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026717815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9725606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793867605","doi":"","title":"Ontario Human Rights Commission","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Human rights; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.04189639077854728,"score_gpt":0.33815660005192294,"score_spread":0.29626020927337565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793867605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08633185,0.000028498545,6.3859034e-7,0.016548393,0.0008839801,0.00014436574,0.00001743086,0.000017723349,0.89602715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9329762,0.00012797717,0.0003044495,0.00016020077,0.0002762361,0.000010754217,0.000016792756,0.000006258207,0.06612117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904215,0.00006629204,0.00021673796,0.0001482588,0.00023948328,0.00028709584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864167,0.000051939118,0.00023820394,0.00045963685,0.00020477398,0.00040377365],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036788738,0.000091507936,0.00012410931,0.0010614406,0.0043523074,0.0002516612,0.00055161706,0.00012214393,0.0021465851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001777258,0.00009118481,0.00007769914,0.00068436004,0.0007017746,0.000713502,0.000018687506,0.00021159361,0.000035974954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029699077,0.00003958835,0.13876262,0.0000041525445,0.000022383025,0.00000407184,0.010542533,5.2803344e-8,0.000011377296,0.6267098,0.22280622,0.0010941977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080342856,0.000013184891,0.16562489,0.000011556934,0.000012219431,2.474863e-7,0.00043606746,3.624758e-8,0.000008380294,0.004634981,0.8290759,0.000102212885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99844444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84664434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107760214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014016111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793956612","doi":"","title":"General practice potpourri, 1988: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on June 15, 1988","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Potpourri; Continuing education; Library science; Political science; Law; Media studies; Medical education; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.01518502898252746,"score_gpt":0.31433383616643645,"score_spread":0.299148807183909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793956612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11498384,0.00010529216,0.000033475666,0.044561107,0.006969079,0.0016407183,0.00026814328,0.0000520548,0.83138627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6553039,0.0003694915,0.0040059295,0.004149212,0.0019801185,0.00051574607,0.000056134744,0.000048402937,0.33357105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818176,0.00025865078,0.0005073439,0.0003009715,0.0002898667,0.00046142805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786705,0.00075570773,0.00039080594,0.00026223852,0.0004223227,0.0003018562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011834805,0.00015404944,0.00023114766,0.0005797861,0.00023923934,0.00011759297,0.00025056393,0.00015447655,0.00045812543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043171747,0.0001450235,0.000050529645,0.00046013162,0.000105075516,0.0011909134,0.000012234294,0.00012687269,0.000025096439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015747437,0.00020197204,0.0004984121,0.00003189062,0.000027246368,0.000005550057,0.011384345,0.00000196009,0.0014020967,0.3357782,0.6162819,0.03422891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038060793,0.000050957948,0.0005440962,0.00012223073,0.000025043224,0.0000018106754,0.0028484103,5.485869e-7,0.0005141811,0.0010714495,0.9942384,0.0002022592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6310728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9415981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5403201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005450904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005550759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9846808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794014058","doi":"","title":"An outline of basic research materials for Canadian law students","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Engineering ethics; Political science; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.09057202237034609,"score_gpt":0.42931818033099156,"score_spread":0.33874615796064544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794014058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20769176,0.000022778459,0.0000042926376,0.02400656,0.0009193448,0.00092342467,0.0011444937,0.000016308732,0.765271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97925293,0.00008080481,0.00027383186,0.00065834314,0.0004125784,0.00007449272,0.00002807764,0.000018095043,0.01920087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980194,0.000298961,0.00036940037,0.00019649554,0.0005679327,0.00054779026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972746,0.00040367822,0.00012417797,0.00031384904,0.001089952,0.00079374854],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032130624,0.00008448628,0.00017632132,0.00076429674,0.00054533797,0.00008960019,0.0005551945,0.00012466207,0.0012051546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001437537,0.00007489392,0.00003226354,0.0004999929,0.00036022253,0.00051022804,0.000010760909,0.000095786105,0.00003120917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014251021,0.000044007407,0.0037808274,0.00001580328,0.00001927683,0.0000018609884,0.0052570375,1.193894e-7,0.0005784338,0.9506941,0.03622997,0.003364312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020939339,0.000060579725,0.0047162566,0.000027816543,0.000009525215,2.2593035e-7,0.0013010204,5.985594e-8,0.000508293,0.003957345,0.9891091,0.000100404664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99680114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95287913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050558895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009535893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794104527","doi":"","title":"Labour law and practice: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on April 14 & 15, 1983","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.021227529034373995,"score_gpt":0.34182199660595514,"score_spread":0.32059446757158117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794104527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06885812,0.000066966124,0.0000023472946,0.013671181,0.0023490298,0.0008271234,0.00012053044,0.000017368824,0.91408736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93300176,0.00023106634,0.0013703617,0.002967327,0.0006106977,0.00017575274,0.000022156615,0.000020065989,0.061600808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987658,0.00016322355,0.00032687202,0.0002352825,0.0001984928,0.00031031953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981929,0.0004867738,0.00043850677,0.00031543427,0.0003320541,0.00023431692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012882907,0.000115457726,0.00019291809,0.00025720012,0.0006811727,0.000400493,0.00024870606,0.00013084563,0.00013162997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005794253,0.00013203773,0.000025731117,0.00012994834,0.00018450432,0.0014268708,0.000017293545,0.00014138556,0.0000058722726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008926479,0.00008453761,0.0005275864,0.00004245953,0.000014973909,0.000003314389,0.013143479,5.253531e-7,0.00013621393,0.9029381,0.076461606,0.0065579256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002781513,0.000040395043,0.0020353093,0.00008403086,0.000020070505,0.0000015928919,0.0043200557,4.5119882e-7,0.00011480164,0.0021007727,0.99085534,0.00014903252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86525315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98051614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9143937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020526018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002896438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69366807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794196834","doi":"","title":"Canada's legal environment : its history, institutions, and principles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05049764926908968,"score_gpt":0.26520400494524765,"score_spread":0.21470635567615798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794196834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014803201,0.00036950468,0.000004971678,0.059713606,0.00057373795,0.00017872956,0.000079802136,0.000011555933,0.9242649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8068166,0.0016954364,0.00021060237,0.0013790525,0.00022671673,0.000027638518,0.0000063393627,0.000009083513,0.18962854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910915,0.000066142515,0.00019978282,0.00014559898,0.00023748544,0.00024181568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991926,0.00011048622,0.000097125194,0.0001385819,0.00006105387,0.00040017278],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002442048,0.00007601186,0.00009119676,0.00019523602,0.00027514307,0.000019397843,0.00013936913,0.00005573864,0.001099786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045845626,0.0000675666,0.000015790114,0.00010309791,0.00020984601,0.00037554099,0.000012940772,0.0000867186,0.000017373883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017154042,0.00000895341,0.0024534138,0.000004353077,0.000008434906,0.000005220226,0.00090995326,6.0177354e-7,0.000019750047,0.8953085,0.095706485,0.005572638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082708444,0.000006431847,0.011110451,0.000010534036,0.000008517339,0.0000013296473,0.00021430358,2.8417625e-7,0.0000072608364,0.000076895616,0.98838025,0.00010102157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99979335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8952316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015210178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023845052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794287810","doi":"10.7202/1043166ar","title":"Kenneth M. Smookler, Farr &amp; Beyond: Lawyers for the Otherworldly (Toronto: Wall &amp; Emerson, 2016), p 118, ISBN 978-1-895131-26-0","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Art; Theology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.07585044040862375,"score_gpt":0.39133732355541206,"score_spread":0.3154868831467883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794287810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045781772,0.0009763781,0.00096461864,0.25614867,0.005721566,0.0005964017,0.00007676057,0.00011248818,0.7349453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75798696,0.004662965,0.015594904,0.025982914,0.008063396,0.00019947629,0.000030468855,0.00022234714,0.18725659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976751,0.00027569127,0.0004883222,0.0002824428,0.0006246284,0.0006538022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967585,0.00064580265,0.00087350595,0.00072286144,0.00069660303,0.0003026857],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00313619,0.00021951839,0.00022475568,0.000046282184,0.025072869,0.0014948342,0.0013153381,0.0001669348,0.0044677584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014346319,0.00016530296,0.00023193499,0.0001211818,0.000571547,0.0023089617,0.00006747349,0.00081782835,0.00047416892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067740206,0.00017740008,0.0001783415,0.0000090976055,0.00018659905,0.0000017689767,0.005228963,0.000014392606,0.00009172662,0.5626168,0.4179737,0.013453447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051426695,0.00002677062,0.0005307783,0.000020820007,0.000061997576,0.00001276416,0.0017823844,0.0000093408,0.00001590737,0.005239447,0.99153847,0.00024705235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12475183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.651659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75752914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037888193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029202565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794359827","doi":"","title":"Checklists of law reports and statutes in Canadian law libraries = Listes de controle des recueils de jurisprudence et [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Statute; Political science","score_opus":0.020901601668822753,"score_gpt":0.310716355905386,"score_spread":0.2898147542365632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794359827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16694094,0.00040770322,0.000003845609,0.014701893,0.00012068742,0.00019684837,0.000092648756,0.000013914881,0.8175215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908539,0.0005837363,0.0012585449,0.00206149,0.00006202697,0.000024732946,0.000005859917,0.000012208607,0.0051375045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855804,0.0002027715,0.00037236814,0.00017694762,0.00016168572,0.0005282108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822986,0.0005184281,0.0001893639,0.00018781191,0.00016254294,0.0007119926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011884647,0.000101240956,0.00018842534,0.00032935664,0.00025931993,0.00010532078,0.00015987636,0.00012555877,0.00016836554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016341059,0.00009558996,0.000027803402,0.00031629598,0.0008439967,0.0010365067,0.000011410599,0.00013785038,0.0000016217085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050721924,0.0000107872,0.08949896,0.000014990414,0.0000081309445,0.000025145524,0.011905506,4.8799046e-7,0.00006535066,0.89508754,0.0021068328,0.0012711863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001230346,0.000016378144,0.050376434,0.000085579966,0.000009498234,0.0000065703575,0.0006756973,4.3925695e-7,0.00021441914,0.043315973,0.9050524,0.0001235745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9029456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038512723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012685957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794431703","doi":"","title":"Legal materials for high school libraries in Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.01955110351883971,"score_gpt":0.282564454396141,"score_spread":0.26301335087730127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794431703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061475813,0.000019804394,0.000007934294,0.09321271,0.0010177443,0.00045169765,0.00013945605,0.000016492935,0.8436583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8640458,0.00010146226,0.000659226,0.0012311974,0.00047883563,0.00010030227,0.000014446573,0.0000141687015,0.13335454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989849,0.00008928126,0.0002941345,0.00014691507,0.0001660419,0.00031872594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987978,0.0005155924,0.00011170149,0.00015541152,0.00014392882,0.00027560187],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004881827,0.00007928019,0.00014172721,0.000401189,0.00018681276,0.00011754563,0.00021763427,0.000099252116,0.0021763707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030830621,0.000067998735,0.000024019611,0.00033483526,0.00013676222,0.0010935183,0.000009216045,0.00006188885,0.000059968395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010559886,0.000009804479,0.0020679121,0.000005852353,0.000005465198,8.63983e-7,0.0011487943,5.636789e-8,0.00008102337,0.9361192,0.05878192,0.0017685691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021356494,0.000014239233,0.0074119684,0.000023021681,0.0000056455883,2.77695e-7,0.00030291275,2.6397027e-8,0.0002688678,0.013467145,0.97818613,0.0001062062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9869781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.922652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020106195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006015835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794571763","doi":"","title":"Our Canadian legal heritage","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03211121276101706,"score_gpt":0.30900518993353127,"score_spread":0.2768939771725142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794571763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007196438,0.000034478493,0.0000031362267,0.12353621,0.0009360608,0.00017871833,0.00011281552,0.000026159478,0.867976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.816005,0.0001573093,0.00024538257,0.0023247583,0.00051034597,0.000019013647,0.0000074273403,0.000015498556,0.18071528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863833,0.00011259019,0.00025586778,0.00018346155,0.00024989463,0.00055985234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981885,0.000096845004,0.00009735429,0.0002458306,0.000219444,0.0011520423],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048563755,0.00010530109,0.00013190629,0.00070431805,0.00048492115,0.00009014096,0.00031792183,0.00012947439,0.0014443705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008707626,0.00009450469,0.000050975374,0.00060674286,0.0001082016,0.0007223247,0.0000074605377,0.00015345955,0.00026733885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023900275,0.00001048732,0.0069462433,0.0000038491457,0.000014772905,0.000018743094,0.0031317677,1.454256e-7,0.00001932349,0.7240932,0.2504685,0.015290606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010340473,0.000010802136,0.0073996317,0.000014975992,0.000008313233,0.0000016696587,0.0022425326,1.0678413e-7,0.0000083809355,0.00094271573,0.98911875,0.0001487072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99987906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80880857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000567789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0145928655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794616657","doi":"","title":"Introduction to law in Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.015551794119098846,"score_gpt":0.26935837655549905,"score_spread":0.2538065824364002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794616657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018474039,0.000009502178,0.0000032261862,0.24580453,0.00083741825,0.00015087654,0.000024850691,0.000007209871,0.73468834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94937706,0.00006815816,0.00023306711,0.0038946401,0.0009883421,0.000025933488,0.0000038918947,0.000008739351,0.045400154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990993,0.00007617593,0.00020663749,0.00014080336,0.00020159957,0.0002754698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992063,0.000115840536,0.000055444274,0.00015618528,0.00012323946,0.00034298425],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033404175,0.0000561192,0.00008790527,0.00031665582,0.00013697566,0.000021896045,0.00015053173,0.00003849895,0.0012208129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066009903,0.000051046427,0.000012123629,0.00065070495,0.000057330042,0.00034465294,0.000006237476,0.000082391445,0.000050969502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032126193,0.000005732499,0.0049247127,0.0000018396972,0.0000029504706,0.0000023622358,0.001810915,0.0000015612852,0.00002150248,0.7134697,0.26855177,0.011203735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006087337,0.000005232297,0.010032264,0.000007971804,0.000002131054,3.3770357e-7,0.00077235256,6.987553e-8,0.000024174105,0.00080741884,0.98820883,0.00007831794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.930903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001242414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013248311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794791225","doi":"","title":"Is There a Lawyer in the House? the Declining Role of Lawyers in Elected Office","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Salary; Legislature; Law; Economic Justice; CITES; Politics; Political science; Nova scotia; Legislation; Position (finance); Sociology; Economics; History","score_opus":0.0766365479764911,"score_gpt":0.39478389071211967,"score_spread":0.31814734273562856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794791225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14464572,0.051440924,3.54125e-7,0.6165883,0.00028314284,0.0013457075,0.00002909832,0.000013474266,0.18565331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9474597,0.014411019,0.000022772861,0.037792597,0.00005970899,0.000051712454,0.000004024062,0.0000071482164,0.00019131381],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988555,0.0003991616,0.00025245378,0.00011063232,0.00016299759,0.0002192542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902064,0.00024219416,0.00019954397,0.00040867104,0.00005891818,0.00007005987],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017400559,0.000064029366,0.0001312347,0.000050585095,0.00053528784,0.00012592661,0.000677289,0.00003620593,0.0011213139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070537423,0.000043145115,0.000038787537,0.00042234088,0.00016306425,0.0003289966,0.000010620762,0.00028747416,0.000058596797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013293349,0.00015578,0.4374746,0.00032639218,0.000072042574,0.000021062475,0.099494755,0.0000018386204,0.000013440954,0.046238117,0.3063224,0.10986627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006879983,0.000005470027,0.056113664,0.00040993994,0.000016168367,7.484928e-7,0.0130286245,0.0000020012144,0.000002100657,0.00026725876,0.93002784,0.00005739547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85681176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9740835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.802814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001281609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016180923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794875334","doi":"","title":"Canadian legal studies.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.043064235401484824,"score_gpt":0.3377222671098045,"score_spread":0.2946580317083197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794875334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006796838,0.00016688906,0.0000016317025,0.123466946,0.0010828903,0.00017737082,0.00007142824,0.000022767592,0.86821324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7411243,0.0011705051,0.00025895494,0.0036481286,0.00061685697,0.000032152948,0.0000061808964,0.000017709075,0.25312525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867976,0.00010942102,0.0002655043,0.00017800697,0.00024469732,0.0005226416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811035,0.00025571953,0.00010082282,0.0002283923,0.0003647731,0.00093994476],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005713447,0.00010116774,0.00015138413,0.000767429,0.0005308848,0.000055238095,0.00027858288,0.00010177828,0.0015367203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016333344,0.0000856563,0.000045674744,0.0006718703,0.00024092768,0.00062997465,0.000008920219,0.00013219472,0.00020701632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016938608,0.000006656892,0.004446509,0.000004114484,0.00003007827,0.000011582789,0.0047406936,1.2554838e-7,0.000006335435,0.70952946,0.26248747,0.018735252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009796653,0.000010587216,0.0030565956,0.000020205793,0.000012091483,0.0000012245613,0.0020251574,5.9571676e-8,0.00000749426,0.0020446505,0.99259,0.00013395463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99796563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73432744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010676727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015670337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795078382","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Report Series & Unreported Cases","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Library science; Political science; Computer science; Geology","score_opus":0.2429803304840647,"score_gpt":0.4719495219106914,"score_spread":0.2289691914266267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795078382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000071149276,0.00038209555,0.0000012883087,0.17929873,0.004621293,0.0005517488,0.00019600189,0.00033147077,0.8145462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027363158,0.0012891744,0.0019351842,0.004312934,0.0034294971,0.00013613094,0.0023154751,0.00007212235,0.9837732],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944389,0.000938404,0.0013517179,0.0007593364,0.0013655676,0.0011460743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99417853,0.001006389,0.00060383126,0.0011214792,0.002199356,0.0008904128],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050043566,0.0003247626,0.00040515518,0.0014514579,0.002803879,0.002039455,0.0010435574,0.00085837574,0.06315314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021067528,0.00032112934,0.00014487005,0.0027789522,0.0010578826,0.004866974,0.0001484528,0.0019829504,0.001048933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005187716,0.00003549361,0.00043447918,0.000019490773,0.00005430275,0.00262,0.0030222496,5.5889178e-8,4.96704e-7,0.17318214,0.8199783,0.0006478345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000382272,0.000036501307,0.00015984838,0.000060394123,0.00003167013,0.0006533563,0.01630724,9.864425e-8,0.000023968692,0.0021714868,0.9801203,0.00039690314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.948423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1749858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005827242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08708428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795133798","doi":"","title":"Public Servants Disclosure Protection Tribunal Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Business; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.07919209207967998,"score_gpt":0.2962641434082387,"score_spread":0.21707205132855872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795133798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07767095,0.00011199102,0.000004456747,0.21906155,0.0028135544,0.0004491671,0.00022033251,0.000029541052,0.6996384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927696,0.00069467566,0.00011124573,0.00045182055,0.00041343304,0.000042518892,0.000024287492,0.000010398454,0.0054820343],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986458,0.00011147583,0.0002490332,0.00018189369,0.0003947803,0.00041702084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983101,0.000058332535,0.00031606297,0.0004071642,0.00042710252,0.0004812776],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004989215,0.00010823193,0.00013778676,0.0008724699,0.0023567928,0.0003407531,0.0005366698,0.00011667873,0.00046573163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017439186,0.00011219818,0.0000623922,0.0015837769,0.0004592433,0.0010831286,0.000018376197,0.00022846209,0.0000073586943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014150202,0.00007145591,0.34092984,0.000032219286,0.000102117214,0.000011925824,0.0035325072,5.7322694e-7,0.000019466397,0.2578916,0.3754601,0.021934053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008996608,0.000010716385,0.15279578,0.000008802568,0.00001074378,6.158244e-7,0.0013112535,5.9852806e-7,0.0000064296146,0.0006554291,0.84499055,0.000119095705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99953836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91509867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016291934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009642811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795212457","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v12i1.3751","title":"Hydra: A Creative Training Tool for Critical Legal Advocacy and Ethics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Keele University; Queen's University Belfast; McGill University; University of Victoria; Queen's University; Georgetown University","keywords":"Improvisation; Creativity; Variety (cybernetics); Legal education; Lernaean Hydra; Openness to experience; Public relations; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science; Social psychology; Visual arts; Art","score_opus":0.2370880729367155,"score_gpt":0.5437583699785463,"score_spread":0.3066702970418308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795212457","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17037696,0.0009741632,0.096541084,0.6742724,0.0062861666,0.0047286213,0.00014249497,0.000944117,0.04573399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96772027,0.0003403313,0.022705553,0.006315756,0.0018965604,0.0007130259,0.000028566123,0.00003706204,0.00024287404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960315,0.0010137307,0.0008699241,0.00066519616,0.00059053535,0.00082908553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835316,0.013124061,0.00014096108,0.00022967592,0.002757194,0.00021653055],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057758763,0.0002973263,0.00040657836,0.00029705506,0.0019631942,0.0006018554,0.00021479308,0.00041377265,0.00012438292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16045938,0.00031806147,0.00008305805,0.00056971237,0.003567492,0.0029982498,0.000099198776,0.0008848996,0.00000997317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007906132,0.00014562593,0.00016579943,0.0002159093,0.00002921752,0.0000018896978,0.1758366,4.3723387e-7,0.0004567924,0.8007453,0.0009229437,0.021400435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016961045,0.0015515652,0.0038826636,0.00045755596,0.00024937204,0.000018760427,0.4907087,0.0016248049,0.0013925455,0.22993848,0.2672233,0.0012561511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021275163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003131374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7973433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007576563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022366205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795286551","doi":"10.11575/prism/29668","title":"Effective Indigenous Terminology in Canadian Legal Research for the Arctic","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Arctic; Indigenous; Library science; Scholarship; The arctic; Political science; Theme (computing); Sociology; Social science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.25057892014462224,"score_gpt":0.5526182819665785,"score_spread":0.30203936182195623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795286551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42222986,0.00002673039,0.0000030530575,0.1750668,0.00065770076,0.0023665542,0.000012938484,5.656447e-7,0.3996358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98645955,0.0000056334684,0.00017392074,0.00018479838,0.00016654564,0.0002442994,0.0000025059344,0.0000032609169,0.012759494],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906474,0.00025122007,0.00008023859,0.00013035336,0.00010911309,0.00036433723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982254,0.00115125,0.000057166526,0.00027177468,0.0002099134,0.000084487154],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039741807,0.000032836168,0.000055202876,0.000106898,0.0038234866,0.001422286,0.00094556814,0.000062959276,0.00083249446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005942617,0.000026403559,0.000011887614,0.00015923734,0.00034166678,0.0006975104,0.000059020713,0.00032081985,0.00023612229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040503983,0.000089525456,0.045421652,0.0000031643674,0.000025345895,0.000014108399,0.15882652,0.0000016500849,0.000021865926,0.0439128,0.0038810275,0.74776185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120584205,0.000023230568,0.07246999,0.000004971121,0.0000029248238,8.1910173e-7,0.007179591,0.0000047681838,0.000029302466,0.0009361129,0.91919094,0.000036751502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9777547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9153099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033375664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048338273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795378795","doi":"10.29173/alr1307","title":"Expert Evidence: The Ethical Responsibility of the Legal Profession","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Legal ethics; Engineering ethics; Criminal responsibility; Criminal law; Engineering","score_opus":0.0970302656051674,"score_gpt":0.47618621640042236,"score_spread":0.37915595079525494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795378795","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00436871,0.011870274,0.000003466135,0.91372067,0.000553021,0.0006732244,4.270644e-7,0.000008779932,0.06880141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90867305,0.010953746,0.00008948192,0.07619146,0.00014224504,0.00007131047,7.5222556e-7,0.000005015218,0.003872948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974568,0.0015400917,0.00032003786,0.00013734766,0.00041421189,0.00013150228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665236,0.002351165,0.0001941901,0.0005144904,0.00024706183,0.000040712905],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037941046,0.00006262563,0.00012916881,0.0000067786164,0.0007822484,0.000049043487,0.00046052388,0.00010266336,0.000535466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016841687,0.000030295434,0.000095477204,0.00069384166,0.00054397795,0.00040697693,0.000056532863,0.00065690966,0.000064885455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055547184,0.00003927466,0.00007610011,0.000083132,0.0000040686205,6.917475e-8,0.005891205,1.7496312e-7,0.00003177192,0.98368686,0.0090605,0.001121309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037208305,0.000007847656,0.00051594805,0.002007797,0.000019385481,0.000001262723,0.00048115672,1.1412141e-7,0.000093073955,0.0029701558,0.9938206,0.000045463355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0889404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04057771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007569813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001627747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795379623","doi":"","title":"PROFESSIONAL EXCELLENCE THROUGH COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Lifelong learning; Continuing professional development; Meaning (existential); Professional development; Public relations; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Legal profession; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.13792286919365468,"score_gpt":0.445149747260576,"score_spread":0.3072268780669213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795379623","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001653418,0.007053444,0.0000026056955,0.60109544,0.0007044119,0.00029821045,0.0000019060909,0.000008806859,0.3906698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68366605,0.058271185,0.0032849868,0.11883382,0.000896745,0.0002659955,0.000026002459,0.000023465616,0.13473175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991947,0.00016098403,0.00014764191,0.00009223882,0.00020453084,0.00019992067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991384,0.000068798065,0.00014283917,0.00035554494,0.00015240468,0.00014200123],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011861925,0.00005257505,0.00008147698,0.000013265467,0.0058576963,0.0002058755,0.000645082,0.0000294409,0.0037868056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011965906,0.00003665575,0.000022402375,0.000098561904,0.0002217892,0.00040762988,0.000022900867,0.00020375077,0.0011576931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.6112394e-7,0.000009301545,0.00048402644,0.000075238684,0.000006741985,0.0000015951598,0.007592518,2.4540345e-8,3.4546966e-7,0.7757001,0.18246558,0.033664268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017484053,0.000001020706,0.004706566,0.0004378599,0.000006821136,8.6843573e-7,0.00030059298,1.4127089e-7,0.0000010256671,0.0015281742,0.99293935,0.00006008266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34283802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77323616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8104738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019921894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010073461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795462720","doi":"10.11575/prism/34056","title":"Help Wanted: Judges","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.018000880581954745,"score_gpt":0.2646057022138197,"score_spread":0.24660482163186492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795462720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112636164,0.000056272438,0.018024988,0.045378733,0.00019862907,0.00009694588,2.8748656e-7,0.00006699412,0.823541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8921973,0.00006336602,0.020564158,0.00032271253,0.00008275795,1.933374e-7,0.000016310507,0.0000051744414,0.08674801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995072,0.000066885106,0.00005680267,0.00008347035,0.00017793431,0.00010772685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996077,0.0000750157,0.00007965726,0.00008783073,0.00011106242,0.000038765433],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021853045,0.0000346017,0.000060514463,0.00008156096,0.00041645882,0.000020970081,0.00015649776,0.000055541648,0.0015339485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007717176,0.00004475273,0.0000348152,0.00028617238,0.00018750418,0.00044843706,0.000021346495,0.000113776485,0.00011707582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021397449,0.00024465792,0.01532558,0.000010467266,0.000021165666,0.000009524925,0.017403835,3.2003004e-7,0.00039738335,0.68663377,0.19442634,0.085505575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013442292,0.000008038139,0.027826041,0.0000033465556,0.000012863834,2.8883935e-7,0.0026334382,0.00007478542,0.00004037902,0.0036118906,0.9655899,0.00006465157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04677719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012437833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77956116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047978683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027083472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795580582","doi":"","title":"CANADIAN BAR REVIEW EDITION ON LEGAL EDUCATION: INTRODUCTION FROM THE CBA LEGAL FUTURES INITIATIVE AND THE CBA EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Bar (unit); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Public administration; Engineering; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.06882788545955318,"score_gpt":0.38340027560023554,"score_spread":0.3145723901406824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795580582","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006128465,0.050596155,0.0000042004986,0.80423427,0.0026068958,0.0013643554,0.00015072786,0.00001315066,0.14096896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2915106,0.20438315,0.000044749395,0.4850786,0.015213153,0.00049768493,0.00032210784,0.00003229577,0.0029176446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964719,0.001979636,0.00040886007,0.00032448466,0.00041539007,0.00039974164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965014,0.0009688453,0.0005304866,0.0008919892,0.0006746574,0.00043264517],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038355656,0.0002144994,0.00031592714,0.000069785696,0.008954072,0.0010691943,0.0008957046,0.000097276934,0.0025579436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01166175,0.00012608524,0.000093971525,0.00040406242,0.00092046714,0.0013127808,0.00003242527,0.00092213345,0.00039699388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004287286,0.000007457115,0.000008990351,0.00009680065,0.000029602086,0.0000011779475,0.0031717492,2.2756528e-7,5.0700972e-8,0.48409146,0.49849007,0.014098146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012354,0.000014545969,0.002027189,0.001527122,0.00042687272,0.000008647463,0.0047375252,0.0000018570506,6.4666654e-7,0.0027312383,0.9882308,0.00016999958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9425768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9843416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48974076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008826619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014848559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796095825","doi":"","title":"Integrated Reflective Practice: A Critical Imperative for Enhancing Legal Education and Professionalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective practice; Legal education; Operationalization; Engineering ethics; Legal profession; Legal practice; Pedagogy; Curriculum; Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04044907062633881,"score_gpt":0.4956787552775857,"score_spread":0.4552296846512469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796095825","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060202565,0.0022281616,0.024384582,0.80412215,0.0046510925,0.0010441663,0.000010079068,0.00006478319,0.10329239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98586386,0.00056625495,0.0022721982,0.0011151453,0.00090541417,0.0000679338,0.0000048380903,0.000011316338,0.009193062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981549,0.0003477563,0.00022097131,0.00017504714,0.00023373625,0.00086763885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971015,0.0008214383,0.00031955476,0.00012637765,0.0015410591,0.000090067464],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041807652,0.00009381952,0.000106648135,0.00008877352,0.004989434,0.0010663071,0.00020902157,0.00009982654,0.00004764556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027137987,0.0000830133,0.000039179897,0.00011810455,0.00024317377,0.0035883402,0.00002096058,0.0019770733,0.000006666147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006654805,0.00013918075,0.00003913178,0.0000027678655,0.000039750154,2.8150075e-7,0.009996406,6.6607406e-8,0.0003310177,0.96233684,0.00076150626,0.026286513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029172454,0.00014892411,0.00019594473,0.00004527785,0.000054868106,0.000119019685,0.21259643,0.000011583978,0.00010439002,0.43944263,0.34684676,0.00014245576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003274517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015122359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92566127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000987825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03626438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800139708","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.1.2","title":"Teaching and Researching Ethically: Guidance for Instructor-Researchers, Educational Developers, and Research Ethics Personnel","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Scholarship; Bioethics; Library science; Political science; Higher education; Pedagogy; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.367231151476828,"score_gpt":0.5345231301389526,"score_spread":0.16729197866212459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800139708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53718644,0.0012142621,0.00038972916,0.45699042,0.0003309678,0.00037086842,0.000007191528,0.000007990403,0.0035021114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831521,0.00007518838,0.009396109,0.00087302516,0.0010700998,0.000018413562,0.0000020201874,0.000017469192,0.0053956066],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911102,0.00736743,0.0002348975,0.00018948097,0.0005672843,0.00053070433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770624,0.021031644,0.00014885367,0.00013006064,0.0011890604,0.00043796425],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12127326,0.00008917022,0.00010625524,0.00028457458,0.049610555,0.0018855198,0.00047311676,0.00017266514,0.00003299786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18666326,0.00006289845,0.00003466648,0.00022895183,0.001879176,0.00070789974,0.000052679232,0.014538359,0.0000011153777],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004938918,0.000006913365,0.0053122486,0.000045264504,0.000051298175,2.7164577e-7,0.54830843,0.0000061422747,0.00016267087,0.38758525,0.0011963395,0.05727579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003448113,0.00015839099,0.016088383,0.00029317755,0.000026094556,0.00005044822,0.25193074,0.00033224918,0.000007009506,0.047807023,0.68279994,0.00016171992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.115511306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10268323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6816036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019892867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059197512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801408833","doi":"10.4337/9781786430793.00010","title":"‘Fighting words’: regulating judges in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Pyramid (geometry); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03634989993479968,"score_gpt":0.2859380492508062,"score_spread":0.2495881493160065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801408833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020135997,0.000076229226,0.000014388467,0.03776984,0.0024184338,0.00026565167,0.000022949262,0.000107902786,0.95912325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07647327,0.00001145911,0.00038199304,0.0023867842,0.0023632809,0.000021899608,0.000030335761,0.00006997073,0.918261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972077,0.00014618572,0.0006466722,0.0004658241,0.0009667298,0.0005669086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733096,0.0010057538,0.000648463,0.00040091987,0.0004062356,0.00020764353],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019899635,0.00027539252,0.00032499243,0.00034634123,0.00066069927,0.0019243482,0.0006797048,0.0003904877,0.0019474353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037716955,0.00026695803,0.00007689534,0.000104419094,0.0001350516,0.0018829799,0.00012121957,0.0014892542,0.00005779289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004909772,0.0000038820226,0.000540183,0.000016828808,0.000029137896,0.000012077851,0.007157041,0.0000011486419,0.000003464413,0.81121695,0.103813805,0.07720055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012861464,0.0000033310414,0.0001218997,0.00028991446,0.00001188519,0.0000015222347,0.0016923225,0.0000021048234,0.0000049459936,0.027628588,0.9697614,0.00035352196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85768396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98697186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86594754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027365622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01741119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801426332","doi":"","title":"Court of Appeal for Ontario","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Alphascript Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0657621426225248,"score_gpt":0.3413164617336619,"score_spread":0.27555431911113715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801426332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005160941,0.000034830602,0.00017096456,0.015278217,0.006126834,0.0006995799,0.000080127604,0.000093697374,0.97746414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002531513,0.000002221839,0.002107102,0.001801295,0.001973303,0.00008919164,0.00029183013,0.00004522999,0.9911583],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979497,0.00007465713,0.0005644378,0.00034122771,0.0006882702,0.00038169793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658334,0.00058433873,0.000823777,0.000433396,0.0014012551,0.00017387631],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024601526,0.00020876367,0.00034491136,0.00028591158,0.0006149275,0.002082639,0.000833373,0.0008535775,0.0008924487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028738342,0.00022721996,0.00019833368,0.00007959348,0.0003818109,0.0019610394,0.00005972611,0.0019898354,0.00001831605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007668989,0.000021613001,0.00001232336,0.000020061689,0.000039677303,3.8417778e-7,0.011873612,3.0609545e-8,0.000017128425,0.4256687,0.5588837,0.0034550838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023549292,0.000027544571,0.0000146824705,0.00005122388,0.000078593555,0.0000012744252,0.001006837,6.261815e-7,0.00002030592,0.04758078,0.9507599,0.00022274934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15928191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5726936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41341168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008391344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02126177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802853531","doi":"10.29173/alr1407","title":"The Law Review Mission: A Student Editor's Point of View","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.08699920699082081,"score_gpt":0.47921682643932656,"score_spread":0.39221761944850575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802853531","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[9.086753e-10,0.6864942,4.2094143e-7,0.05347934,0.0030632077,0.002581234,0.0000059332256,0.000018448078,0.25435725],"genre_scores_gemma":[8.776606e-8,0.9677443,0.00003118768,0.018111777,0.0029335374,0.00044432323,0.00007206348,0.00004523218,0.010617521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99301326,0.0026937828,0.0022625222,0.00050014775,0.0010421987,0.00048805666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99146295,0.004164384,0.0021195314,0.0013420836,0.0006507016,0.00026035795],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005415628,0.0004885228,0.0025675534,0.00003541249,0.0011576375,0.00021892891,0.0015971828,0.00025022047,0.0034873781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034021859,0.00029279842,0.0010182688,0.0020948544,0.00055156945,0.0004983052,0.00015648834,0.00095143734,0.0011159581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.9510908e-7,0.00006241139,6.236838e-8,0.06397802,0.00007479859,8.0595305e-7,0.00008450456,1.0677143e-9,7.2537726e-10,0.38866714,0.25644562,0.29068643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024886825,0.000012865483,3.1854032e-8,0.28343204,0.0014890109,0.000012558318,0.000026751275,4.433558e-9,6.8416517e-9,0.00011481935,0.7146556,0.00023141825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01985248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010967849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45820996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002214907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002108973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802970483","doi":"10.29173/alr1408","title":"Role of the Law Review: A Select Biography","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.025033120170301446,"score_gpt":0.3564745734724988,"score_spread":0.3314414533021973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802970483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000109317116,0.21676214,3.268826e-7,0.14873086,0.00013090477,0.00050267956,0.000001298726,0.00001067105,0.6337518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12361808,0.7475826,0.00007421456,0.124003306,0.00014061887,0.00009721546,0.000008865255,0.000011769484,0.004463316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987264,0.00041512624,0.0003239613,0.00012733435,0.00024533604,0.00016180264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878424,0.00034784735,0.0002439634,0.00035241997,0.00021878378,0.00005272206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087152125,0.00007756117,0.0002079422,0.000015808393,0.00037462293,0.000032572516,0.00034439657,0.00003611548,0.001769225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008807829,0.000052360196,0.00017334217,0.002022232,0.00022987748,0.00032046152,0.000022486583,0.00016824686,0.00016060258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.7042482e-7,0.00004441615,0.00035540687,0.00038837251,0.000015316331,5.0463143e-8,0.0003298409,1.3557723e-8,0.000007991092,0.9508924,0.0450172,0.0029485438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024288436,0.000005704698,0.00008872596,0.0026870917,0.00009092261,0.0000024419483,0.00003237687,1.2856185e-7,0.000011085877,0.001166597,0.9958227,0.000067912355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09878767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06009469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95080554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017363302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020619441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803402636","doi":"10.1017/cls.2018.3","title":"Harry Glasbeek Class Privilege: How Law Shelters Shareholders and Coddles Capitalism. Toronto: Between the Lines, 2017, 382 p.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Privilege (computing); Class (philosophy); Shareholder; Sociology; Political science; Economic history; Law; Economics; Management; Philosophy; Epistemology; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.03713672220333496,"score_gpt":0.3122804749471741,"score_spread":0.2751437527438391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803402636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5680148,0.0033886142,0.000054027,0.3096556,0.0032144547,0.00051308307,0.000423809,0.000028573297,0.11470699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805979,0.0005232338,0.00021919659,0.014210144,0.0019006226,0.0000063797784,0.000019651328,0.000022743154,0.0025000863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842876,0.00020917263,0.00035320045,0.00022845312,0.00016624885,0.0006141883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970615,0.0004618158,0.00037902247,0.000206669,0.000667634,0.0012233908],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017723775,0.00018034922,0.00029836583,0.00003289965,0.0023342266,0.0007956742,0.00039588063,0.00019709604,0.00024885556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004003762,0.00016750547,0.00015964812,0.00019546799,0.0020504599,0.001506242,0.00002130941,0.00060162524,0.000002535566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002868094,0.000007828346,0.0007867781,0.000025462015,0.00016001167,0.000015374831,0.15822895,4.5851334e-7,0.000011057443,0.77623206,0.0634019,0.001127246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030006454,0.00007628882,0.002373876,0.0000635197,0.000097988974,0.00005432304,0.103706695,0.000008744814,0.000005300409,0.0043276385,0.88876325,0.00022228963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50817204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9699002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8253614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085033005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002587676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804314192","doi":"","title":"Chinese and American Forum on Legal Information and Law Libraries: Highlights from Hangzhou","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; China; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01276419225647997,"score_gpt":0.3280597777615261,"score_spread":0.31529558550504616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804314192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3247307,0.0000102775875,0.0001670014,0.16995783,0.00033240754,0.00010023312,0.0000093411545,0.00007619704,0.504616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845958,0.000025500382,0.0012446037,0.012387184,0.00029138444,0.000005217157,0.00001577757,0.0000025204256,0.0014320604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953556,0.000041365965,0.00011034485,0.00007700525,0.00012909576,0.00010661184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995075,0.00018789028,0.00007675038,0.0000755396,0.00008008412,0.000072239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000112904265,0.0000534933,0.00005913581,0.000050602506,0.00062288536,0.00071825157,0.000057080888,0.000030414989,0.0003700676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002097479,0.000040948482,0.000007207341,0.0002916831,0.0005117355,0.004092473,0.000019880637,0.00007458251,0.00009384325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012322701,0.000012566498,0.0015713976,6.175776e-7,0.0000049579567,5.978821e-8,0.015866667,1.874163e-8,0.000006451786,0.96454144,0.012240856,0.005742667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009467903,0.000054941687,0.008073151,0.0000024883739,0.0000028154489,1.9778962e-7,0.009504413,0.000019146562,0.00005590849,0.007311383,0.9748157,0.00006514442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07847705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02580143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9625749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013634233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012826725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804397918","doi":"10.29173/alr1285","title":"The Civil Justice System and the Public: Highlights of the Alberta Pilot","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; General partnership; Public administration; Public relations; Alliance; Political science; State (computer science); Civil society; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03731775034346534,"score_gpt":0.3339262583776665,"score_spread":0.29660850803420113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804397918","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010663849,0.018324152,0.0000013173454,0.53903234,0.0004435651,0.00047951372,6.5230256e-7,0.0000065366407,0.4416053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.915472,0.03818043,0.000021739523,0.017776994,0.00039829646,0.00010971035,0.0000016243241,0.00001000796,0.02802921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979675,0.0009896049,0.0003930424,0.00013600002,0.0003157401,0.00019813795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934224,0.0054275193,0.0003483365,0.00050331134,0.00023896161,0.000059503272],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022735945,0.00009300828,0.00018506502,0.000008910531,0.001895529,0.00024012956,0.0006020902,0.00003340007,0.00019002009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036381825,0.000038577287,0.00007230913,0.00059218024,0.0007355589,0.000449634,0.00006627355,0.00020153646,0.0001219532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030812605,0.000020890695,0.000010258636,0.00020900503,0.000020272413,2.0108505e-8,0.0015361256,6.7533506e-8,4.6672207e-7,0.97420514,0.02256544,0.0014292218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013263825,0.000005534524,0.000035177305,0.00035590972,0.000214268,0.0000048240727,0.0005001169,0.000006796894,0.0000023364166,0.00028569656,0.9983987,0.00005799348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064995006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44648138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047267473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032855477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807785635","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Starting Canadian Legal Research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.34484424560324445,"score_gpt":0.5101292064878254,"score_spread":0.165284960884581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807785635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000114404764,0.00044430033,9.0448293e-7,0.29023704,0.0029262474,0.00083740643,0.0002920342,0.00014851704,0.70499915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013858631,0.00077975297,0.0018632627,0.011921951,0.0071580904,0.00019435462,0.0007838891,0.00016463311,0.96327543],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868508,0.003947281,0.0012490796,0.0010946139,0.0029416522,0.0039165677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882006,0.002420115,0.00024787933,0.0012600081,0.004234102,0.0036373169],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020763224,0.0004151891,0.00046394442,0.0060635596,0.0090472745,0.005838714,0.0030475322,0.0013678214,0.07526555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019998174,0.00044114332,0.00016003472,0.006871656,0.0016445206,0.005384418,0.00027699015,0.007341022,0.0046264776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038707703,0.000022834583,0.00027053367,0.000021210386,0.00003262992,0.00008872654,0.0059730564,2.2831428e-7,8.550421e-7,0.33505726,0.6565319,0.001996889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008237459,0.000050389044,0.00014229452,0.00012707086,0.000012676208,0.000004357733,0.033282124,0.0000039975853,0.000016194515,0.005373948,0.9604069,0.00049769756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99989974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32968333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038402532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25399342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809849274","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2273903826120791,"score_gpt":0.44916225349173455,"score_spread":0.22177187087965544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809849274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003355729,0.00020126907,0.0000017087002,0.14584988,0.004246233,0.00042679996,0.000058812853,0.0001517842,0.84902996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00068796525,0.0004499349,0.0026102192,0.010617279,0.0032682281,0.00007214631,0.00048425508,0.0000586537,0.9817513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960761,0.0007368799,0.0006103406,0.0005019224,0.0010276913,0.0010470654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691606,0.00064559607,0.00017295983,0.00064801273,0.0009774257,0.00063996774],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032348877,0.00022816872,0.00025819955,0.0012597602,0.0022353386,0.0018744767,0.001432677,0.0007927957,0.21673098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002714709,0.00022848259,0.00010767787,0.0016435526,0.0005572518,0.0029470455,0.000120232035,0.0028539444,0.0040969206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001572619,0.000020683829,0.00033503695,0.0000055415117,0.000019906793,0.000012061077,0.0099941855,2.510814e-8,6.917928e-8,0.3519351,0.6367858,0.0008900481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046490597,0.00002025773,0.0002901119,0.00004371851,0.000013987932,0.00000222268,0.0067351665,1.2916024e-7,0.0000034706518,0.007124142,0.98543197,0.00028830892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99976647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3486462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017114738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14044818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W281354433","doi":"10.55016/ojs/ajer.v49i2.54975","title":"Discourses of Conflict: A Multidisciplinary Study of Professional Education","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Educational research; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Social science","score_opus":0.17356747730327024,"score_gpt":0.5666311744045761,"score_spread":0.39306369710130584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W281354433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85562783,0.00025825284,0.000001041827,0.030878365,0.001179821,0.00034650808,0.0000018449487,3.0224942e-7,0.111706026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442526,0.000048649963,0.00027772645,0.00003152362,0.00028972008,0.000029109511,0.000003925242,0.0000080055115,0.05505871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640274,0.0013162245,0.0007188865,0.00012666779,0.0012212114,0.00021428823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98111975,0.013884141,0.00067969895,0.0001906925,0.0039590625,0.00016666653],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033538663,0.000075160984,0.00018778845,0.00058144087,0.0004783261,0.00004431328,0.00038044996,0.000064069405,0.008242218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031045202,0.0000646167,0.000065004424,0.0012679148,0.00039849913,0.00074125594,0.00002996495,0.00052748,0.000027984175],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011785742,0.017228113,0.23814833,0.00004496602,0.00010810115,1.4177995e-7,0.13650192,0.000018974904,0.00067099405,0.5766433,0.029889978,0.0006273402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009970523,0.00083206024,0.19712937,0.0002676874,0.00007605544,0.000022049951,0.5350648,0.0000034290626,0.0006084913,0.008049656,0.2567533,0.00019605004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007552702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036231587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5685936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014017106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020143371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2852858962","doi":"","title":"Volunteer Lawyers and Nation-Building: Using Experience to Serve the World Community","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics","score_opus":0.20485384766202344,"score_gpt":0.4550879058964419,"score_spread":0.25023405823441847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2852858962","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21722797,0.010325846,0.00025442688,0.527236,0.0006968154,0.0010554362,0.000006518635,0.00010748675,0.24308953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.928508,0.0027958727,0.0024344125,0.060406763,0.00017576036,0.000058111953,0.0000033577169,0.000008697967,0.0056090127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890804,0.0005018846,0.0001771116,0.000083208506,0.00019751422,0.00013222247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999091,0.00035904383,0.00008169011,0.00021285132,0.0001849833,0.00007040677],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013659628,0.00006065852,0.000105014355,0.000026405945,0.0021813794,0.00008544009,0.00022483425,0.000016726875,0.0003737788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095675,0.000046163925,0.000024494508,0.0009988997,0.00026558051,0.00040131205,0.000051027746,0.00025670332,0.00002114915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014098866,0.000047021953,0.0010862176,0.00008995037,0.0000075056364,8.3464175e-7,0.029721277,0.0000034509176,0.00003092827,0.9493869,0.018285349,0.001339184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002142278,0.000003908232,0.00039172062,0.00018896704,0.000009560317,0.0000045983656,0.0011641427,0.000007022578,0.00000817949,0.0002901483,0.9978459,0.00006445506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02806616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017886296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97956055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006489469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012726153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287888172","doi":"","title":"Safe and Inclusive Schools – Expensive...Quality Education – Priceless, for Everything Else There's Lawyers!","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Legal education; Quality (philosophy); Sociology","score_opus":0.03414989431579128,"score_gpt":0.3956349827684218,"score_spread":0.3614850884526305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W287888172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80668086,0.003778452,0.005421735,0.13943747,0.0013208238,0.00082040136,0.0000051673837,0.00006344453,0.042471617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836905,0.0046890923,0.0009978975,0.0015619464,0.000960444,0.000031598658,0.0000070118544,0.000013318415,0.008048192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794793,0.0003202421,0.00029932594,0.0001772349,0.00031085926,0.0009443821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836004,0.00034490987,0.00036009966,0.000112369926,0.0006999807,0.0001226237],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031629167,0.000103778315,0.0001352153,0.00010921825,0.0025092415,0.00018522918,0.00019069595,0.00009529843,0.00006712036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020097648,0.00010134369,0.00005885464,0.00031636233,0.00011931542,0.0013431001,0.000024652634,0.0015043434,0.000017623617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004842002,0.00013981631,0.0027566398,0.000005823141,0.00005794527,4.1892613e-7,0.017210927,0.000001853404,0.00019819554,0.9465237,0.0032242308,0.029831996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005765644,0.00009431323,0.003754497,0.00002258755,0.00003114311,0.00014296305,0.16104367,0.0000045745833,0.00006210584,0.34785777,0.48614576,0.00026403382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003073878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040142033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59866595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012000204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026465654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883538131","doi":"","title":"Making the world a better place","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BCLA Browser: Linking the Library Landscape","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.057831984407803315,"score_gpt":0.34756163060747575,"score_spread":0.28972964619967245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883538131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033162132,0.0006160592,0.000027756398,0.39005154,0.001554137,0.00025129243,0.0000036125596,0.00023423425,0.57409924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92691976,0.00003374555,0.0008567583,0.029319504,0.006282974,0.000038387,0.000016615075,0.00002727961,0.036504976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832416,0.0005383483,0.00021580262,0.00013820498,0.0003353005,0.0004481622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799514,0.00136359,0.00016676728,0.00037275962,0.000028758695,0.00007297587],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011715227,0.00011751733,0.00009486946,0.00009050486,0.0016368068,0.00076756225,0.00069996214,0.00007421192,0.0031756102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018138567,0.00006839915,0.00006985687,0.0011112705,0.00014557695,0.0026055211,0.00012160311,0.0006379587,0.00034833775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021407823,0.00007096894,0.13910088,0.000008236308,0.00003835748,8.5501205e-7,0.036347024,0.000008261303,0.000008439019,0.3378902,0.481474,0.005031363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087260676,0.0000033880517,0.012223438,0.000028077853,0.000021071459,0.000003158098,0.0025450229,0.000037473514,0.000018343448,0.00296729,0.98194635,0.000119125994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000687473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018318628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89375764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016021057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029282324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883695252","doi":"10.53300/001c.6314","title":"Exploring Changes in the Emotional Intelligence of Law Students","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Legal education; Law; Publishing; Project commissioning; Psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Political science; Library science","score_opus":0.32325907880305554,"score_gpt":0.5100017198188589,"score_spread":0.18674264101580335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883695252","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034218807,0.0097911935,0.000094264054,0.4892798,0.0038921447,0.0013297584,0.000003716981,0.000036057754,0.46135426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576515,0.017784739,0.00032991034,0.022079209,0.00072955503,0.00023189058,0.000008701936,0.0000045263923,0.0011799983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988179,0.00032618258,0.00024564823,0.00010797831,0.00039225174,0.000109990135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991093,0.00016822772,0.00015029257,0.0001777816,0.00036354855,0.00003083193],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017378917,0.00005273587,0.00009247815,0.00006162454,0.00022664924,0.00008718304,0.00038706203,0.00001896061,0.0010426125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008485263,0.000041668278,0.000025096608,0.00089245377,0.00019767988,0.000725698,0.00001574342,0.00015452721,0.00012816988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.920858e-7,0.00024436132,0.00061617367,0.00011845243,0.000003297067,5.9556193e-8,0.018417466,7.643908e-8,0.0000031065392,0.93664896,0.0041835303,0.039763533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012647787,0.000015376485,0.00438328,0.0006307461,0.000009296144,0.0000010009527,0.0057839756,2.1799326e-7,0.00003300022,0.0009789886,0.9881035,0.00004794174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006423932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005415435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005331876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074950175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884686682","doi":"10.5334/kula.40","title":"The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse: Origins and Goals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Civil rights; USable; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06468279802853663,"score_gpt":0.4654572817283917,"score_spread":0.400774483699855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884686682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3719316,0.004496124,0.0006532476,0.08094097,0.0013782313,0.000934764,0.000008337222,0.00030725822,0.53934944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9218221,0.0019443601,0.00017657595,0.00013810216,0.0005775013,0.000099608675,0.000022712087,0.000009474837,0.07520961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998618,0.00033178524,0.00033117662,0.00024864395,0.00027667184,0.00019372538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959004,0.0018155042,0.00021420117,0.0001633157,0.0018191165,0.000087480425],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015640229,0.00012494645,0.00012438871,0.00013259645,0.0042682374,0.0005937154,0.00011436282,0.00008653875,0.000097573124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003867505,0.00009836903,0.000021740527,0.00068472466,0.0008684294,0.0012521714,0.000058877646,0.00013907427,0.000045256005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018619108,0.000045988185,0.0064356937,0.000019594265,0.0000490476,6.760823e-8,0.15365072,2.244271e-7,0.000107048276,0.7885833,0.030078014,0.021011693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015430042,0.000026206048,0.039485577,0.00004949249,0.000030261108,7.1070804e-7,0.013309237,0.00021766414,0.00029447163,0.017165639,0.92913884,0.00012760497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004335063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009756806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89906085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001281854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013434183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99702805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885008690","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2018.1464759","title":"An examination of the effectiveness of Readers’ Theatre as a teaching strategy in legal education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; History; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03565681160170658,"score_gpt":0.39504151197051723,"score_spread":0.35938470036881065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885008690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60266846,0.000008402207,0.000013857419,0.0025968028,0.00014411865,0.00017667413,4.6358358e-7,0.000007307872,0.39438394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984139,9.677842e-7,0.00003404363,0.00016878839,0.00018199292,0.000016963673,0.0000023183977,0.0000050847775,0.0011758977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652594,0.002966906,0.0001431579,0.00008664607,0.00018896605,0.00008839166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914294,0.00033957826,0.00013095478,0.00023284483,0.00013744744,0.000016227536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047095683,0.000046878653,0.00006594299,0.00003495786,0.00029692575,0.000046059355,0.0002580576,0.000054418648,0.00012504046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038717958,0.000029818888,0.000021512833,0.00033041814,0.0004146791,0.0005611559,0.000011468157,0.0002567562,0.000006645255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001918868,0.00030244444,0.0016488226,0.000008241684,0.000005792261,1.6599763e-8,0.0751871,0.000005073226,0.0019635241,0.90601873,0.00007677484,0.014764311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042051813,0.00023294645,0.5764561,0.00019830978,0.00005563932,0.000002701707,0.30542457,0.00007995453,0.008627025,0.04625496,0.062036138,0.00021111185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06034065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0084623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85976374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006935606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006159915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94591665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885288477","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Nunavut","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.20029932104661277,"score_gpt":0.46048000523377286,"score_spread":0.2601806841871601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885288477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001219622,0.00045457282,0.0000026493963,0.20850992,0.00393709,0.0004178604,0.000109801935,0.00017263813,0.7863833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010567483,0.0017013291,0.0023690767,0.012964646,0.005160933,0.00008920028,0.0004725908,0.00007375173,0.9761117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955941,0.0010168082,0.000644123,0.00053089,0.0010969185,0.0011171948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962193,0.0009114682,0.00018857536,0.00070298533,0.0011164005,0.0008612964],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003767959,0.00023857736,0.0002671628,0.0014214362,0.002338139,0.0019103455,0.0015908962,0.00084266247,0.13990477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055246847,0.00023688475,0.000112474496,0.0023547213,0.0006967598,0.0030494381,0.00012737003,0.0023552815,0.0059972466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001343065,0.000020512358,0.00010629227,0.000009515437,0.000018286986,0.000011159431,0.0033785172,2.8504328e-8,1.6328532e-7,0.37807363,0.61674553,0.0016350459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046512963,0.000018410967,0.00009566657,0.000052456027,0.000013281226,0.000002324067,0.0093863,5.394351e-7,0.0000073048386,0.007109638,0.98296756,0.0003000176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98224694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95688564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.370964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000611209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06518106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885527349","doi":"","title":"Research guides: Primary sources: Canadian: Government & legal information","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science","score_opus":0.1023408231059054,"score_gpt":0.4308747698664036,"score_spread":0.3285339467604982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885527349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003227334,0.000128844,0.000013381898,0.16087654,0.0027567851,0.00044946515,0.00017873548,0.000056084507,0.83550787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0047463356,0.0010443414,0.0006919064,0.012723402,0.0033602233,0.000120022,0.00070969976,0.000023673527,0.9765804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574065,0.00039768807,0.0004984396,0.00022441363,0.0024384118,0.0007003745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670106,0.0005590564,0.00041215666,0.0006512947,0.0012574096,0.00041903494],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005620422,0.00016990963,0.00020778185,0.00040352324,0.0042399657,0.004507077,0.0012035107,0.0005256064,0.006472293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006270191,0.00016743546,0.000075259115,0.00046342026,0.00048340575,0.0055093146,0.00010552848,0.0015514743,0.0021541873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002720065,0.000013050853,0.00004781747,0.000028997398,0.000020035173,0.000001676902,0.0055396412,6.298565e-7,1.508565e-7,0.1178911,0.8664493,0.010004862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007038081,0.000014451799,0.00027468987,0.000058390757,0.000012204731,0.000001090183,0.01783621,0.0000017524846,0.0000019575316,0.00046505316,0.9810579,0.00020591907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95561594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84991914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14815314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034373868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030223565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885571311","doi":"10.35502/jcswb.73","title":"Justice: Let’s look beyond the system as we know it","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Need to know; Internet privacy; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Computer security; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037381903377900066,"score_gpt":0.3715233516178193,"score_spread":0.3341414482399192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885571311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031264096,0.00043829894,0.00056949613,0.2770221,0.0015276622,0.00009846111,7.515098e-7,0.000017783448,0.68906134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875524,0.002445968,0.00019966066,0.0047062472,0.001206721,7.148452e-7,8.762608e-7,0.0000067147384,0.0038806812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749595,0.0015226301,0.0004268354,0.000040823405,0.00034014435,0.00017360912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673724,0.0018310775,0.00046565902,0.00022745095,0.00062667264,0.00011188716],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005554313,0.00008175232,0.00015004397,0.00008867403,0.004738116,0.0002606551,0.00047568133,0.00008183217,0.00033439876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010042683,0.000060078473,0.000058889895,0.00038215096,0.00043780822,0.0008322717,0.00007292033,0.0012853893,0.00008771695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115553055,0.000116623276,0.00022007768,0.0000613683,0.00007923329,0.0000036924287,0.31267834,0.000008707392,0.000043644846,0.6268136,0.030868514,0.028990671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017039281,0.00007542266,0.00055858004,0.00012045295,0.00008924347,0.000055954988,0.21385652,0.000019490953,0.00003157347,0.0073671853,0.7775907,0.00006448773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017798659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010482229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95628834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011029311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005692984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W288690391","doi":"","title":"America’s Culture of Litigation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.034789075570135684,"score_gpt":0.32267505630838256,"score_spread":0.2878859807382469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W288690391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8166136,0.00014306024,0.0035371196,0.0047412687,0.00041756165,0.00011973127,0.000016674714,0.00004082693,0.17437014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914074,0.000060534207,0.0021006428,0.0001370796,0.00014304894,1.7831593e-7,0.000022453061,0.0000034672173,0.006125195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992395,0.00013740086,0.00010008829,0.00008386977,0.00026654344,0.00017259507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909896,0.000101832426,0.00024845326,0.00012817509,0.00032150242,0.000101094185],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039261227,0.000054221564,0.00010734674,0.000092228795,0.000446422,0.000024955509,0.0001786183,0.000081294515,0.0011789901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003397732,0.000066842505,0.00006563104,0.00061355816,0.00043029062,0.0013987205,0.000025452373,0.00014272667,0.00009871074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006754185,0.0000891102,0.0099167945,0.000008313625,0.000020680971,1.0768591e-7,0.11641567,0.0000022763588,0.000024203602,0.8671956,0.0061995494,0.000120924095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011106906,0.00001585083,0.0054364307,0.000005440249,0.00002344679,3.8609204e-7,0.1473888,0.000002870964,0.0000021003416,0.6524952,0.19444552,0.00007286603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068264203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007585447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21470039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084488245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024547477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887519783","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Northwest Territories","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.14465612454073168,"score_gpt":0.4354920114704034,"score_spread":0.2908358869296717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887519783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002568978,0.00034838324,0.0000012615951,0.17026117,0.0070561143,0.00038554208,0.00046040583,0.00020820633,0.82125324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024784927,0.0013413819,0.0019642531,0.006533786,0.010578439,0.00011017991,0.002017547,0.00007821525,0.9748977],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586666,0.0008051901,0.0006666121,0.00051891664,0.0010893017,0.0010533052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612904,0.0009878769,0.00019497643,0.00067384716,0.0012224301,0.0007918158],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025381318,0.00026062006,0.00028152237,0.001241896,0.0027245427,0.0023515143,0.0015204751,0.0007806481,0.043096595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004929394,0.00025724072,0.00010554506,0.0020872292,0.00089599704,0.0036561894,0.00012809454,0.0020733261,0.0013864957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001681205,0.000024197785,0.0012432919,0.0000125556535,0.000021571044,0.0000141549335,0.0057186885,2.5646731e-8,8.0972406e-8,0.30363446,0.6880965,0.0012327464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004298328,0.000023575087,0.00048805625,0.000052807525,0.000014480915,0.0000024334424,0.014086112,1.7730565e-7,0.0000067497535,0.0032718824,0.98169196,0.0003187899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99735785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3003626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005720716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054081198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887842190","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Manitoba","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2301080299650064,"score_gpt":0.45421657990515185,"score_spread":0.22410854994014545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887842190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015647855,0.00038161842,0.0000024166366,0.17704773,0.0044388156,0.00044272718,0.000106861175,0.0002004222,0.81736374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00096128794,0.0015929455,0.0023711107,0.012612431,0.006216,0.00008837217,0.0004946619,0.00007653538,0.97558665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957629,0.0009787093,0.000614818,0.0005036518,0.0010653866,0.0010745293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965049,0.0007969355,0.00017877494,0.0006679731,0.0010711224,0.0007802806],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033626517,0.00023285444,0.00025013418,0.0014283463,0.002366791,0.001998526,0.0015720614,0.00078740163,0.07998051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041616466,0.00023324623,0.000104157174,0.0021396496,0.0006238593,0.0029555564,0.00013056785,0.002245269,0.0055941306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013197292,0.000019956642,0.00011243054,0.000009785371,0.000018473209,0.000014516678,0.002237095,1.9694872e-8,1.4193272e-7,0.35821745,0.6370543,0.0023145103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042982832,0.000017866485,0.00012442794,0.000047944926,0.000013535589,0.0000027039082,0.018613093,3.4868378e-7,0.0000065084223,0.006297939,0.974543,0.00028966498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99275273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98603034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3519195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069843774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05032226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888190429","doi":"10.4324/9780367199432-2","title":"Theory and Practice, Together at Last","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04649023479511862,"score_gpt":0.37631588787596226,"score_spread":0.32982565308084366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888190429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006460655,0.00022184833,0.000041218354,0.03902557,0.000627651,0.00020236801,0.0000056819426,0.00004621533,0.959823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008243753,0.00047881503,0.00034689432,0.007237395,0.00034782023,0.0000029655723,0.000010992533,0.00001986636,0.9907309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908686,0.0002105019,0.00014124272,0.00018833631,0.0002549396,0.00011811416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99602133,0.0033098084,0.00019576943,0.00017789246,0.0002290664,0.00006611827],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022733517,0.00010636498,0.0001086911,0.0000721783,0.00032440122,0.00016158386,0.000100985715,0.00023789277,0.030029017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002247166,0.00009537525,0.00003204593,0.000035959027,0.0002126415,0.0005363215,0.000050782415,0.000334699,0.003671766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019321353,0.000008023019,0.000010238185,0.0000035506323,0.0000274583,6.50087e-7,0.0043997765,2.908137e-8,0.0000021449346,0.92110026,0.07079308,0.003635459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047813563,0.000008670515,0.000010771114,0.00001050247,0.000035135006,0.0000040323052,0.002348496,7.19932e-8,7.850083e-7,0.04116898,0.9562345,0.00013024273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035943763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017028217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8854414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099727884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007346466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888740438","doi":"10.23977/aetp.2018.21014","title":"Improvement of Methods in the Process of Criminal Law Teaching Based on Amendment of Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; China; Process (computing); Teaching method; Curriculum; Criminal investigation; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.039366973540276275,"score_gpt":0.5029618361902147,"score_spread":0.46359486264993843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888740438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8992689,0.00025880474,0.00045859063,0.05172384,0.0005092406,0.0003043469,0.0000091318525,0.000004294532,0.047462832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926678,0.00004961918,0.006346733,0.00082698977,0.000030591662,0.00005404692,0.0000024740343,0.000002922824,0.000018825856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986883,0.0003523561,0.00050108903,0.0001673708,0.00016849866,0.00012238322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981539,0.0006908295,0.0006267226,0.000281446,0.00023620296,0.000010876916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018632674,0.00006994985,0.00018730044,0.0002967772,0.000121260964,0.0000029126966,0.00042514387,0.00011094667,0.000089373454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089167856,0.000050615457,0.000028019844,0.0009235402,0.0020687603,0.00017728082,0.000021220021,0.0003257986,1.3304775e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006125481,0.0009556357,0.010054071,0.00007258573,0.000006888698,2.0183785e-8,0.019162912,0.00000891409,0.0016251206,0.9590933,0.000030821207,0.008928483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010380159,0.0016521501,0.16745766,0.00023756232,0.00007820075,0.000007897436,0.09497587,0.000026374275,0.027902164,0.6833299,0.023095718,0.0001985154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010613122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020200065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27576342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002169531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000335197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76224333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889005851","doi":"","title":"Book review of Canadian Handbook of Higher Education Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.042146405207616006,"score_gpt":0.4120350097898767,"score_spread":0.3698886045822607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889005851","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009354558,0.05212087,0.000001859204,0.57515687,0.001195907,0.0001689349,0.000040378352,0.0000013693044,0.37037835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8189995,0.009407315,0.0007167846,0.11343772,0.0038652606,0.000010143204,0.000055314256,0.000012495142,0.05349545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898636,0.00011111992,0.00049158774,0.000073074334,0.0001801562,0.00015766989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685293,0.0001391562,0.00049502676,0.000101242236,0.0016901649,0.000721469],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044458313,0.000069732225,0.00013938411,0.0007924386,0.0003415399,0.00005885619,0.00015023227,0.000066130604,0.013272072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009129574,0.00007303683,0.000045778186,0.00084567344,0.0005457086,0.00052447815,0.0000019558943,0.00012765908,0.000016452515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024562344,0.00002514422,0.00034114032,0.000068810914,0.000009907942,1.0772357e-7,0.0013915767,2.5722022e-8,0.0000109797675,0.56472534,0.43299508,0.00042941427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056794994,0.00007505534,0.0039664004,0.00065791083,0.000022363303,0.000016357108,0.00033064774,6.658162e-8,0.0001220714,0.0034892552,0.99119943,0.00006363637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5543574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67018414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81806403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002059794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09444419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98762995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889006257","doi":"10.5539/ies.v11n9p47","title":"Ethics of the Teaching Profession among Secondary School Teachers from School Leaders’ Perspective in Riyadh","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Perspective (graphical); Ethical code; Sample (material); Medical education; Pedagogy; Professional ethics; Psychology; Descriptive research; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.1374546027186543,"score_gpt":0.5243885732336171,"score_spread":0.3869339705149628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889006257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6643799,0.0003302608,0.000028479966,0.2016672,0.007894655,0.00024797374,0.000008694568,0.000026777841,0.12541604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805236,0.000076330325,0.0008757179,0.0028823963,0.0012153733,0.000069853864,0.000007260154,0.000008477874,0.0143410275],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980657,0.00067568163,0.00034655107,0.00023087735,0.00054106466,0.00014009868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99564004,0.00080894394,0.00034780396,0.00018779683,0.002954486,0.000060902228],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015404808,0.000098372235,0.00012067498,0.00020151067,0.0007986988,0.00008984834,0.00042027349,0.00011745189,0.00088780344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033045307,0.00008069383,0.00005244595,0.00041229374,0.0009144163,0.0010195189,0.000093074676,0.0013489934,0.000072948074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016656915,0.00029410791,0.26486295,0.0000053426306,0.0001331881,8.947866e-8,0.60666347,0.0000020989048,0.00016973386,0.07775808,0.047575038,0.0025192413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013220981,0.000007993936,0.23118058,0.00015114485,0.000012033449,1.8143264e-7,0.64276195,0.000003371179,0.000115047354,0.0132635655,0.11229065,0.00008126491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035051607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016619483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31614366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009382612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045399796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97509974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889167737","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Legal Citation with the 9th edition of the McGill Guide: Citing Unreported Cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.1894977285060953,"score_gpt":0.4738197067210603,"score_spread":0.28432197821496497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889167737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00091089384,0.000049284263,0.00007218351,0.1904436,0.0038388397,0.00079203816,0.0001734142,0.00007152941,0.80364823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19925465,0.00016844638,0.0014172487,0.004630762,0.0066647585,0.00018852532,0.00027681902,0.000058379053,0.7873404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951501,0.0014566949,0.0006812658,0.00033546443,0.0019877907,0.00038871693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98885006,0.0038701997,0.0009938799,0.00059620716,0.005625834,0.000063829],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076699303,0.00016922384,0.00019353912,0.00028479536,0.0035145178,0.00032535876,0.000737464,0.0002648862,0.0019423414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01589786,0.000091489244,0.00008764368,0.0029364976,0.0015915876,0.0008892391,0.00009675272,0.0010409877,0.000046003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008005642,0.000034688554,0.000029936467,0.00002120264,0.000041253832,0.0000027018352,0.0028116172,0.0000026092737,0.000014261897,0.08784048,0.90838814,0.00080510764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007312049,0.00005876801,0.00018188347,0.00014407121,0.00005065322,0.000019098106,0.04923798,0.000005260949,0.0001580299,0.0008668329,0.94907653,0.00012775554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10014634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048243295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19834375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029583814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004980785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889839771","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: New Brunswick","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.1950129672052556,"score_gpt":0.4491901179131567,"score_spread":0.25417715070790114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889839771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000060904677,0.0006007854,0.000006468276,0.27735913,0.003571313,0.000397665,0.00002795983,0.0001874014,0.7178432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002268242,0.0018331226,0.00430874,0.016473237,0.008020768,0.00001763473,0.00037488207,0.00007984205,0.96866494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956076,0.00084686244,0.00069451454,0.0005602814,0.0011152795,0.0011754503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959541,0.00084576814,0.00020970807,0.0007320054,0.0008614075,0.0013970088],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029695167,0.00025999834,0.0002908562,0.0014156812,0.0019830153,0.0020772223,0.0016988803,0.0008815132,0.1281128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053757634,0.00026164763,0.00012083803,0.0026208789,0.0005133771,0.0032650328,0.00013081692,0.002382988,0.0058303885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016090328,0.000014724078,0.0001250555,0.0000071968175,0.000018294706,0.000008470201,0.003446551,3.4975557e-8,9.756066e-8,0.4163792,0.5771515,0.0028472748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000669019,0.000022009699,0.00017607179,0.000054952052,0.000015378866,0.0000026470555,0.0062469435,3.6799838e-7,0.000006219343,0.0079905065,0.9850948,0.00032319088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99838954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4083887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059168745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25100717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890003896","doi":"","title":"Limiting Lawyer Liberty: How the Statement of Principles Coerces Speech","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Licensee; Obligation; Political science; Law; Diversity (politics); Charter; Statement (logic); Sociology; License","score_opus":0.06096990356583961,"score_gpt":0.36374360187486915,"score_spread":0.30277369830902956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890003896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53147966,0.00058323005,0.0012148796,0.3510022,0.0008889712,0.00024370798,0.0000022121167,0.00003620324,0.114548944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821209,0.0012247243,0.00025406497,0.00049322756,0.0009988528,0.000003167478,8.686507e-7,0.0000071064082,0.014897104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981978,0.00026075897,0.0002232784,0.00008386017,0.0003756148,0.0008586717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884486,0.00021980236,0.00034979495,0.000108792665,0.00043295388,0.00004379785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050213668,0.00006142842,0.00007463584,0.00005727474,0.0010316303,0.00023207632,0.0002982542,0.000037508293,0.00024757857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082948006,0.000041958083,0.00004301169,0.0003730504,0.00026178983,0.00053144863,0.000023177994,0.0010247517,0.000027317014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001135676,0.000055083576,0.0018839346,0.0000017872032,0.000072152056,2.4566822e-7,0.014784566,0.0000011848194,0.00016756204,0.95604837,0.002033667,0.02494011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013218407,0.00012199854,0.0006274442,0.000011927468,0.000024026058,0.000020035679,0.07364275,0.000013131388,0.00043361657,0.059592295,0.86530244,0.00007815742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011542637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02039437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89645606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035958955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005994195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890874976","doi":"10.1007/1-4020-3505-5","title":"A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Freie Universität Berlin; Università di Bologna; York University; University of Sussex; University College London","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Philosophy of law; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03334069270551614,"score_gpt":0.3709026200248392,"score_spread":0.33756192731932305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890874976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009553141,0.00024579672,0.000017956181,0.028446278,0.00021178086,0.00014415552,0.000015515074,0.000028911478,0.9707941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040423255,0.00047843388,0.0016920584,0.0009346809,0.0014357605,0.0000077983805,0.000018039571,0.000009573242,0.99138135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991601,0.00005575691,0.00022424139,0.00016129029,0.00028475863,0.00011384171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925756,0.00014846666,0.00019817504,0.00013414718,0.00018599318,0.00007562632],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002546908,0.000099513185,0.00015751013,0.000121840545,0.0001826172,0.00009649215,0.00013694694,0.00017126426,0.0024599975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015546517,0.00009577566,0.000040673018,0.00013365943,0.00030617687,0.00050158234,0.000020211337,0.00026483362,0.000052431886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026666387,0.0000241426,0.000020060344,0.000008633402,0.0000122679085,6.181982e-7,0.0018947213,1.8772782e-7,0.0000018631113,0.845421,0.1469242,0.0056896466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000680374,0.000014815839,0.000056321514,0.000021765523,0.000025314563,0.0000012298632,0.00010111546,0.0000020531143,0.0000040988098,0.015627066,0.9839722,0.00010596288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00318191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019443141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83704805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097526405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026410345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893586452","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Books","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.22199273254596913,"score_gpt":0.462944602228817,"score_spread":0.24095186968284787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893586452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005969561,0.00045181793,0.0000026387497,0.18242964,0.0035460105,0.00041813924,0.00009567433,0.00019589522,0.81285423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000687534,0.0011605078,0.0021112273,0.014639007,0.004732052,0.00008364332,0.00037128705,0.00007077916,0.97614396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995865,0.0009427513,0.00061447173,0.0004937012,0.0010231937,0.0010608971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653894,0.0008016768,0.00017751566,0.00066017703,0.001001765,0.0008199409],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003509475,0.00022555914,0.00025126452,0.0013732974,0.002319098,0.001899161,0.00146547,0.000771472,0.09378324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004330514,0.00022456411,0.0001060132,0.0015833611,0.0006899248,0.0026201745,0.00012344733,0.0022821613,0.0037986068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012224856,0.000014384884,0.00004786064,0.000007983342,0.000016370594,0.000010198248,0.0029831121,1.5634695e-8,1.6837666e-7,0.4033473,0.5917945,0.0017768982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043553235,0.000018513274,0.00005116338,0.00004791977,0.000012544212,0.0000021472679,0.00812756,3.7697342e-7,0.000009037228,0.007319803,0.98408437,0.00028302812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98503095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9337509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3960275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005310786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06226418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894344267","doi":"","title":"LAWYERS’ ETHICAL OBLIGATIONS, INNOVATIVE MODELS OF LEGAL SERVICE, AND A TIME OF REGULATORY UPHEAVAL:: SETTLEMENT COUNSEL AS AN INSTRUCTIVE MODEL","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Negotiation; Confidentiality; Competence (human resources); Loyalty; Work (physics); Professional responsibility; Law; Public relations; Legal ethics; Political science; Business; Engineering; Management; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.030724492715216923,"score_gpt":0.36565435882615044,"score_spread":0.3349298661109335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894344267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9243476,0.00010050633,0.0023277267,0.049449313,0.00013831408,0.00023901026,0.000032107033,0.000016083142,0.023349358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968285,0.00035395144,0.00087044854,0.00068875105,0.000115387265,0.000005985845,0.000007893903,0.000011065381,0.0011180112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802786,0.00023790276,0.00041598952,0.00016658314,0.0005551933,0.00059645576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970086,0.00008481097,0.00080927025,0.00025539973,0.0017484493,0.000093473405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039600097,0.00010627739,0.00019258537,0.0001470641,0.0011170554,0.00017086556,0.0003772858,0.00017824424,0.000042540683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000422574,0.000106064654,0.000033896875,0.00035094394,0.00045462974,0.0022077637,0.000038269052,0.0020272874,0.000003785601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005558121,0.00008089102,0.00019379107,0.000005340991,0.00008508789,1.7267237e-7,0.017325714,0.00018923417,0.00046933204,0.9800387,0.00012261258,0.0014335595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058111205,0.00016543388,0.00082895823,0.000030846913,0.000040430914,0.000024843483,0.024273982,0.0048037167,0.00022433033,0.9673921,0.0014853457,0.00014893654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003639182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003330027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072480924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038309747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015354115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99022794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895014424","doi":"10.4324/9781315421414-14","title":"The Evidentiary Narrative: Notes toward a Symbolic Interactionist Perspective about Evidence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Symbolic interactionism; Narrative; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; The Symbolic; Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Literature; Art; Philosophy; Visual arts","score_opus":0.10461726961524521,"score_gpt":0.43896867721617217,"score_spread":0.33435140760092696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895014424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000056041176,0.0016837353,0.0001712148,0.29893997,0.0018424438,0.00032667333,0.000005919634,0.00008633498,0.6969381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08172677,0.005420832,0.0000663019,0.001511376,0.0016351804,0.000054485638,0.0000024728583,0.000027637754,0.90955496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980742,0.00020598833,0.00039407142,0.0003996066,0.00064189354,0.00028424978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99274224,0.0046536964,0.0004869391,0.00037665598,0.0016179857,0.00012249066],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011180198,0.00023821964,0.00020500457,0.00013109956,0.002863918,0.0013125407,0.0005532487,0.00024132094,0.010710428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006381328,0.0001551224,0.00017397602,0.0001316976,0.00091924454,0.0017782707,0.000077066565,0.0008209797,0.0018583129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016697591,0.000009928218,0.000010224298,0.000004304688,0.000080648344,0.0000012861824,0.047607996,4.1573948e-8,0.000005969568,0.9110308,0.035853803,0.0053782994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040144198,0.000017946566,0.00006129921,0.00034071758,0.000042770942,0.0000032098333,0.027109183,4.5438392e-7,0.0000065766953,0.08448587,0.88766956,0.00022226885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057294667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009749767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85181576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008374342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002636395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895540657","doi":"","title":"What Humility Isn’t: Responsibility and the Judicial Role","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Virtue; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03523697854366416,"score_gpt":0.4107625419211889,"score_spread":0.37552556337752474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895540657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24441077,0.000084074214,0.000042443153,0.24506848,0.0009403879,0.00019153323,6.899601e-7,0.000040349325,0.50922126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834474,0.000057797584,0.00014836987,0.004818907,0.0005584569,0.0000074781574,5.6790446e-7,0.0000016190289,0.010959408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989867,0.0005050096,0.00011271486,0.000119160344,0.00016411155,0.0001122838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998857,0.00066245144,0.000040101586,0.00017073417,0.00022555862,0.00004411579],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003435872,0.000034164674,0.00005127796,0.000019607558,0.001091464,0.0003750558,0.00010671195,0.00003866986,0.0028494727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028415036,0.00002226786,0.000016447791,0.00029373722,0.0015510869,0.0010479852,0.00002853676,0.00012640523,0.000117384734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013511907,0.00003568128,0.0012469938,6.2488084e-7,0.0000050848616,4.0517655e-8,0.07044698,1.4590048e-8,0.000025966976,0.9057592,0.010083289,0.01226096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021291157,0.0000127077365,0.015249073,0.0000017069261,0.0000064013343,2.5877546e-7,0.05116036,0.000016152562,0.00009341374,0.09470356,0.838497,0.000046473277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014195864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026321465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82841367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028461809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004404441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895866880","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1310","title":"A Current Assessment of Legal Aid in Ontario","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Government of Canada; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Legal service; Service provider; Government (linguistics); Poverty; Business; Per capita; Economic Justice; Certificate; Service (business); Inflation (cosmology); Duty; Public economics; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Law; Marketing; Sociology","score_opus":0.07901487436676469,"score_gpt":0.47999810925427805,"score_spread":0.40098323488751336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895866880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65583247,0.0000232977,0.000038756432,0.04963052,0.00065979816,0.00005675667,0.0000016662199,0.0000025909558,0.29375416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996679,0.00002208977,0.00024305236,0.0009051045,0.0017609637,5.4401613e-7,2.9717668e-7,0.0000019652555,0.00038696875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999257,0.000112954505,0.0002712959,0.000036612175,0.00021766598,0.00010443016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932563,0.000045029134,0.0002777576,0.00002504611,0.0002817203,0.000044799268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007540652,0.000035335743,0.00011451231,0.000109255765,0.00024605353,0.00006892672,0.00007654448,0.000038574497,0.00012257522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098802084,0.000032320986,0.000037903646,0.0001915969,0.00027322615,0.00047827617,0.000010904532,0.00030418386,0.0000010648943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008200243,0.000100470694,0.0043266807,0.0000027319818,0.0000074695095,4.424183e-7,0.05176021,8.267611e-8,0.00002119364,0.9409854,0.000990876,0.0017962481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027712737,0.000064157204,0.0563115,0.000013170549,0.000008118895,0.0000017896377,0.0027078588,7.9340055e-7,0.000007534715,0.008155562,0.93241346,0.00003891134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42972937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48431888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93282986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024486097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041319877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7329969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896446680","doi":"","title":"Logos, ethos and pathos in balance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Pathos; Ethos; Logos Bible Software; Balance (ability); Aesthetics; Political science; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Literature; Psychology; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.021687970280415116,"score_gpt":0.3409427334892145,"score_spread":0.31925476320879936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896446680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22589462,0.00010774434,0.00029983924,0.19932832,0.0012807249,0.0006167582,0.0000037070424,0.00021039842,0.5722579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898881,0.0002997422,0.0012551898,0.0058071204,0.00045701422,0.00006395238,0.000033532495,0.000018986037,0.002176364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980712,0.0004339326,0.0003451342,0.00038763625,0.00038349276,0.00037858373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859476,0.00066147203,0.00016101543,0.00025141035,0.00017111354,0.0001602314],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016609586,0.00016229405,0.00018704626,0.00021002389,0.00073857076,0.00033024326,0.00023055168,0.0001360775,0.0013444915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025184578,0.00017461888,0.000034896722,0.0008481276,0.00040737237,0.0013332744,0.000031605814,0.00042011373,0.0003194359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024863735,0.00014046152,0.033725686,0.000020837913,0.000018755596,0.0000019253125,0.03334382,0.000014023261,0.00079094083,0.81254214,0.0009974901,0.118379034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056139886,0.00003085747,0.036055822,0.000027199983,0.000015433636,0.0000034960294,0.006915329,0.0001365449,0.000023031247,0.012636708,0.9432799,0.00031428348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019167452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029114888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9422824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000180209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038629974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896662560","doi":"10.15845/voices.v18i3.2570","title":"Justice Values in Kenny’s Theoretical Contributions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Voices A World Forum for Music Therapy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Sociology; Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05898885075020578,"score_gpt":0.42033049416025237,"score_spread":0.3613416434100466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896662560","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12293411,0.000841662,0.003915377,0.5221884,0.0073233815,0.002457693,0.00016672649,0.00036470176,0.33980796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98411125,0.00010623461,0.00084155315,0.008585716,0.0014420283,0.00015815516,0.000018267101,0.00001442679,0.004722394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986713,0.00017991498,0.00026129239,0.00021707435,0.00020978713,0.0004606192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817204,0.0010149793,0.000117095435,0.00019122301,0.00040943822,0.00009522146],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012504571,0.00010616154,0.00013468666,0.00022645983,0.0010652023,0.0002142521,0.00026822294,0.00007604789,0.0025218842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089572417,0.000096272284,0.000071056886,0.001220253,0.00080024096,0.0005478288,0.000016309816,0.00020948064,0.0000988673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008338661,0.00013876507,0.0005310357,0.000002683968,0.000015012447,2.0220595e-7,0.011326043,5.773655e-7,0.000060565675,0.9409311,0.037383422,0.00952725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005823077,0.00007749984,0.00058497785,0.000012261201,0.000015347747,3.148298e-7,0.0067141987,0.00010633586,0.00013277108,0.1296836,0.86196566,0.00012473317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011027568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01997024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8611771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040693133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99838996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896919731","doi":"","title":"Chapter 8: Ethics and Criminal Law Practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Law; Political science; Legal ethics; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.08307823120527272,"score_gpt":0.4498285477572064,"score_spread":0.3667503165519337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896919731","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010370631,0.000557341,0.0006754549,0.5017692,0.0006172462,0.00006884088,5.355725e-7,0.000018353541,0.48592243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98406786,0.0061024763,0.0003266485,0.003434012,0.00065233285,0.000001646204,3.3002078e-7,0.000006558275,0.0054081115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984539,0.00024107598,0.00012792146,0.000100504076,0.0003001552,0.0007764559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986909,0.00040971796,0.0002951989,0.0001508283,0.00036749925,0.00008584086],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008065744,0.000058063488,0.000059188213,0.000034711113,0.006111152,0.000968619,0.0002569273,0.00009027578,0.0001095587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064175497,0.000055081942,0.000024394221,0.000035947294,0.0003467678,0.0023254922,0.000025837839,0.0048677414,0.0000422366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012885727,0.000021973183,0.00009201445,9.640935e-7,0.000021815325,0.0000012344301,0.011194228,8.411514e-8,0.000010646077,0.97913975,0.000073248986,0.009431132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012498665,0.000041517997,0.00021297506,0.0000048977704,0.00003546324,0.0001306756,0.03976584,0.0000012242226,0.0000049078376,0.25587025,0.7037378,0.00006943463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00947557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028314358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97369725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021524767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046766773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99742806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897263024","doi":"10.1017/s1472669618000324","title":"Reflections in the Fishbowl: the Changing Role of Law Librarians in the Mix of an Evolving Legal Profession","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Legal profession; Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03597807165061488,"score_gpt":0.3874668148063581,"score_spread":0.3514887431557432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897263024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03045951,0.000011359471,0.00041444774,0.0653866,0.00035538376,0.0008203523,0.0000035725564,0.00002152241,0.9025273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943076,0.000007793441,0.00045270493,0.0045819376,0.00012141883,0.000077695026,0.000014493071,0.0000024340147,0.00043392254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986076,0.000407903,0.00037263308,0.00005753407,0.00038960998,0.00016472457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992234,0.00014431287,0.00023878644,0.00024779767,0.00013337428,0.000012301662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027183294,0.00005702393,0.00005930396,0.00023327876,0.0006510374,0.00038201082,0.00047035608,0.000038233233,0.0000996651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013608145,0.000033593406,0.000024340308,0.001577149,0.00016134763,0.0058671935,0.00004495401,0.00023442526,0.000014793731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007007271,0.000057079465,0.00006350393,0.000010682992,0.000004277974,1.140857e-7,0.23484388,0.00003464154,0.000006929818,0.76059395,0.0013681189,0.0030098339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106185136,0.000030023382,0.0042099594,0.00002565793,0.000007779683,5.4282555e-7,0.33213645,0.00068153936,0.00004799835,0.0025033096,0.66020894,0.000041624546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010167212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010484108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9638481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044283075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010647684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897529290","doi":"","title":"The Chutes and Ladders of Precarious Non-Citizen Legal Status Trajectories and Incorporation in Toronto.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 15-21, 2018)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal status; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.018830464904551574,"score_gpt":0.34195924709581643,"score_spread":0.32312878219126484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897529290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8880516,0.0022083258,0.000015339967,0.014087148,0.00206395,0.00052546465,0.000045473396,0.000034565528,0.09296813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99515873,0.0005567401,0.00029736524,0.000247744,0.0002504387,0.000028162707,0.000011346579,0.0000082854285,0.0034411848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864185,0.00031668562,0.00038410886,0.00020524849,0.00017081099,0.00028130732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809986,0.0008864414,0.00040393227,0.00016965545,0.00037218255,0.00006793733],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094078435,0.00011601352,0.00023149025,0.00008095205,0.00050580717,0.000080466576,0.00017861607,0.000144114,0.00017435136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075849803,0.00009682498,0.000027396809,0.00023112206,0.0036903156,0.00072891,0.000050282844,0.00023094748,0.0000045812726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032852235,0.00022257998,0.24951422,0.00006286473,0.00023845816,0.00000197748,0.24066775,0.0000015703348,0.0013033292,0.4146167,0.075577065,0.017464984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015429582,0.0004088259,0.39012805,0.00006630316,0.000082405684,0.0000024087224,0.079948016,0.000052494714,0.000960273,0.018604496,0.50776887,0.00043493081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039997328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23007499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4321918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001069499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064713694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897592736","doi":"10.4324/9781315268798","title":"The Relational Ethics of Narrative Inquiry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative inquiry; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.24324784666883173,"score_gpt":0.48714062511014145,"score_spread":0.24389277844130972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897592736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006532556,0.00005505101,0.0001222583,0.10734959,0.0016616173,0.00012093747,0.00000313137,0.000017333407,0.89066356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00060482195,0.00012891681,0.0004632353,0.001178263,0.001486514,0.000007300557,0.000028935234,0.000006351422,0.99609566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872357,0.00032729525,0.00023734978,0.00009637866,0.0005246241,0.00009080464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99388236,0.0043072593,0.00034023385,0.00014907497,0.0012900942,0.00003098857],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026285546,0.00006173614,0.00007480389,0.000046314875,0.0014659454,0.00007510238,0.00020311821,0.00036614516,0.0038728367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058512716,0.000043764263,0.00004186609,0.00016865757,0.0013922817,0.00023913867,0.000021258564,0.0009616562,0.000213057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013413162,0.0000036027175,0.0000017750438,0.0000011799348,0.000010026481,1.5593743e-8,0.12924945,7.1424765e-8,7.807275e-8,0.4856519,0.38497123,0.00010928665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019255354,0.000008912869,0.000023899014,0.000013227537,0.000007580145,1.01921756e-7,0.030047644,5.15376e-7,9.019706e-7,0.09484457,0.87498444,0.00004892775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049195124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041076494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4900132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013342958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012213622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898100169","doi":"10.11575/prism/32514","title":"Self-represented Litigants in Family Law Disputes: Views of Alberta Lawyers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Family law; Political science","score_opus":0.14086436602935176,"score_gpt":0.45055547390985345,"score_spread":0.3096911078805017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898100169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26291758,0.000048448495,0.0000028009636,0.006352275,0.0002734202,0.00027149313,0.0000035076246,0.0000010746212,0.7301294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98818564,0.000021935199,0.0026093498,0.0004599369,0.000088377856,0.000015913269,0.000009615651,0.0000044779167,0.008604759],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990887,0.0002089311,0.00022843998,0.00010850755,0.00016305129,0.00020237609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921244,0.00033795307,0.00012174862,0.00016436874,0.00007453175,0.00008894428],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010261365,0.000051933177,0.00010801113,0.000043795735,0.00013485651,0.00012265233,0.0003210687,0.00005357097,0.0022445223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047150222,0.00004980652,0.000020555182,0.0005322599,0.000099633304,0.0015505131,0.00005911333,0.00012267038,0.00046877709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034873334,0.002028613,0.09098036,0.000017946708,0.000071223236,0.0000013837297,0.5779035,0.0000023235475,0.00078896014,0.28322762,0.013196365,0.031746835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014418692,0.000005620989,0.0045885635,0.000014113813,0.0000076944225,2.06064e-7,0.0144341085,0.0000043369846,0.0003237391,0.00009730832,0.9803149,0.00006521698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074648455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053207092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96711856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004312221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032146554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898542783","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Legal Citation with the 9th edition of the McGill Guide: Citing Cases that are Freely Available Online","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; History; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2575314722265055,"score_gpt":0.45013798898233376,"score_spread":0.19260651675582824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898542783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013068407,0.0001879684,0.000047982652,0.23482473,0.0040279026,0.0009841104,0.0011728285,0.00009316395,0.7573545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042238623,0.0004139047,0.002140664,0.005983969,0.0063538197,0.0001205864,0.00044505313,0.000060476777,0.9422429],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509615,0.0013971948,0.00054734776,0.00040198176,0.0020897563,0.00046756607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896756,0.0038698202,0.0010437772,0.0006715885,0.004663104,0.00007614807],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005650102,0.00021225514,0.00024663197,0.0002990061,0.0036253142,0.00040923167,0.0010149329,0.0003044074,0.0046574296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010395626,0.00011751374,0.000097256816,0.002370037,0.0014810525,0.0012083568,0.00014042795,0.0012511084,0.00013463592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116108085,0.00007478513,0.00013251047,0.000039614933,0.000040185052,0.0000020383097,0.0017102534,0.0000032470941,0.000008671009,0.021296265,0.9762375,0.00044334133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010161559,0.00006463162,0.00025167697,0.00029457573,0.00004914398,0.000009179778,0.070757784,0.0000093976705,0.00014453317,0.00048244427,0.9276785,0.00015650484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10587065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14403005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22884075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033048514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036299513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99794024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900244530","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2018.1526472","title":"Legal Education and Training Review: a five-year retro/prospective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Commission; Political science; Legal education; Public relations; Space (punctuation); Legal service; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.04471215414005692,"score_gpt":0.39390933480847723,"score_spread":0.3491971806684203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900244530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012979512,0.00072893745,0.000011907904,0.10794414,0.00039401397,0.00021083189,7.954277e-7,0.000039739432,0.87769014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399482,0.00022084448,0.00038276194,0.009523774,0.00124327,0.000030707055,0.0000020264388,0.0000063242405,0.04864211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931383,0.0002141595,0.00009893138,0.00011136549,0.00014116339,0.00012051911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949086,0.000078158526,0.000070609865,0.00014154152,0.00017832422,0.000040519684],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011733363,0.000048447797,0.00006411288,0.000014725573,0.00072444737,0.00012437778,0.000116946445,0.000035239977,0.0011884727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005179419,0.00003609621,0.000016901897,0.00027414304,0.0004277502,0.0004470783,0.000014565385,0.0002293347,0.00015311809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029707921,0.00003228771,0.0002106817,0.000004237278,0.000006438059,3.5784044e-8,0.05447875,4.015489e-9,0.000008573229,0.8799073,0.057561025,0.007787677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004762858,0.00001562988,0.0017804621,0.000043291755,0.000018014043,0.0000016466265,0.019409517,7.31005e-7,0.000007823057,0.005803249,0.9728173,0.00005467759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00784613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022020182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9269687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055809705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004558884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900273955","doi":"","title":"Litigation Risk Analysis: Using Rigorous Projections to Encourage and Inform Settlement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Dimension (graph theory); Work (physics); Task (project management); Risk assessment; Actuarial science; Public relations; Economic Justice; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Business; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Economics; Computer security; Finance; Management","score_opus":0.031795092776903455,"score_gpt":0.39637626671071313,"score_spread":0.3645811739338097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900273955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9168648,0.00015291949,0.017946716,0.03578057,0.0005526701,0.00034258308,0.000014878691,0.000035514862,0.028309347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995383,0.0007526913,0.0005733124,0.00014578561,0.00038490313,0.0000073256706,0.0000032359492,0.000004705493,0.0027449916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985655,0.0000889951,0.00021030045,0.00011379415,0.0002774979,0.0007439374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902,0.000048480735,0.00039782326,0.00016746741,0.00025819748,0.00010803646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031999836,0.000067267305,0.00008925076,0.00026062378,0.0045567155,0.00091278204,0.0001920965,0.000046440884,0.00007095716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093259796,0.0000643573,0.000051959905,0.00044921416,0.000077454715,0.0013316238,0.00002479634,0.0010364143,0.0000124856315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019759467,0.00008816827,0.08257328,0.0000024382007,0.00079966395,7.8039756e-7,0.0325661,0.00030781457,0.00006026469,0.84516454,0.00020706927,0.038210146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009063665,0.0003325048,0.097213075,0.000032637472,0.0018110762,0.00009263306,0.2260772,0.0012423671,0.000059675156,0.3938076,0.2777453,0.00067959254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015190059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07395674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45135692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008490667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039989077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900274025","doi":"","title":"Suggestions for Reforms at the National Law Universities Set Up Through State Legislations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Public relations; Political science; Legal education; Narrative; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.05235783023406502,"score_gpt":0.39596094750929234,"score_spread":0.3436031172752273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900274025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03886053,0.00029585947,0.015982911,0.3895086,0.0022477114,0.00053868716,0.00013826395,0.00009905288,0.5523284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85639745,0.00038845016,0.00017489461,0.0017292717,0.0011047584,0.0000130527,0.000028771821,0.000009220797,0.14015414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837893,0.00013056333,0.0001751721,0.00010477863,0.00036729197,0.00084327796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984053,0.00032778675,0.00017834983,0.00007793037,0.0009679318,0.000042710944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023088322,0.00007111906,0.000059018006,0.000056003235,0.0053481325,0.00020976963,0.00023963803,0.00004800234,0.00039025294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002732462,0.00005312412,0.000064207125,0.00040169735,0.000529464,0.0013768018,0.000021226406,0.0007906522,0.00009825248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018563978,0.000012338661,0.000023407143,4.6230232e-7,0.000046618807,3.0902118e-8,0.019515585,0.0000138907235,0.0000101263995,0.9656198,0.014461188,0.00027799234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013568121,0.00004083669,0.00003249179,0.000002053255,0.000011860249,0.000013194919,0.037055288,0.000009857876,0.000013848576,0.38804913,0.57458514,0.00005058551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039815535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12841256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8175369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025345439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011471357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99594676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900299709","doi":"10.4324/9781315544984-4","title":"Qualitative Ethics in Practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.3006342762805737,"score_gpt":0.5790596887246426,"score_spread":0.27842541244406893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900299709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.8440272e-7,0.000034066168,0.00010393488,0.31828246,0.00041075886,0.00012154119,0.000006354625,0.000030051806,0.68101066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000794418,0.0006074059,0.0013779451,0.009454327,0.00037507527,0.000009481768,0.000005891325,0.00001460435,0.98736084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841064,0.00049812644,0.0002709701,0.00018532689,0.00048827962,0.00014664115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98960555,0.00915933,0.00028735277,0.00014980356,0.0007375255,0.00006044821],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046290667,0.000101837126,0.00012022611,0.00016408059,0.00025333295,0.000109263296,0.00015623252,0.0005059008,0.008285757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014935409,0.00008625429,0.000035427714,0.00008844013,0.00026554227,0.00094506214,0.000019397938,0.0014491742,0.0021651015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004587009,0.000011975688,4.4508252e-7,0.0000022567497,0.000012237609,0.0000014784694,0.17185105,1.8720902e-8,2.5649427e-7,0.8085787,0.018411998,0.0011249823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050502185,0.000006235778,8.525504e-7,0.000039999537,0.000010375124,3.3044316e-7,0.03298436,3.5927446e-8,3.1102007e-7,0.16929042,0.797503,0.000113595896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032403553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009395538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.779091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025155433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035035808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901057521","doi":"","title":"The Changing Landscape of Corporate Legal Practice: An Empirical Study of Lawyers in Large Corporate Law Firms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Corporate law; Practice of law; Legal ethics; Competition (biology); Business; Legal profession; Law; Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Legal practice; Public relations; Political science; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.17104935254128212,"score_gpt":0.4277385962548079,"score_spread":0.2566892437135258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901057521","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19541988,0.01720818,0.0000037474908,0.5796839,0.0010389904,0.0031167527,0.000052566586,0.000032353044,0.20344362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922077,0.001155272,0.00002063375,0.0058999085,0.00007273004,0.000029441282,0.00000898252,0.000007681437,0.0005976185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976009,0.0013309498,0.0003582134,0.00011236225,0.00032511275,0.0002724581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802154,0.00030933367,0.00063977967,0.00032247548,0.00048679655,0.00022008752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008236426,0.000074143616,0.00019124195,0.000075368866,0.0005492034,0.000099114724,0.00036856672,0.000039221806,0.000100926525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020020863,0.000047549216,0.000026039945,0.0014002058,0.0001779255,0.0005488808,0.000020003317,0.00027961266,0.000029093177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025518946,0.00034155048,0.014482371,0.00008517158,0.00004679373,0.000016819316,0.06590982,0.000009904807,6.04534e-7,0.8881138,0.028981708,0.0019859602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018663425,0.000067504036,0.001007889,0.000098419834,0.00004344534,0.0000025992488,0.058210254,0.000018005785,5.040302e-7,0.0005656785,0.93973005,0.00006901054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41660443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9426395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91074836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017655916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032561426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58728045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901240236","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Yukon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.23133669998070308,"score_gpt":0.4739042812642327,"score_spread":0.2425675812835296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901240236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010909271,0.0004026001,0.0000027637243,0.20777392,0.0038213325,0.0004003274,0.00009323344,0.00018690799,0.787308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010704512,0.0016195809,0.0022979986,0.01207278,0.0050633373,0.00007800173,0.0004943661,0.000070997325,0.9772325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957585,0.0010115025,0.0006127469,0.00050334155,0.001055659,0.0010582572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648,0.000840253,0.0001817547,0.0006561207,0.0010461425,0.0007957397],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037193876,0.00022561295,0.00025253976,0.0014344032,0.0022309788,0.0018072005,0.0014508378,0.0008174418,0.104409985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005156941,0.00022380981,0.000104188686,0.0023185099,0.0006208665,0.0029909944,0.00011946617,0.0022397079,0.0045312806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013707953,0.00001905244,0.00006136901,0.00000908607,0.000015772439,0.000009655491,0.0030579725,3.160413e-8,1.6578178e-7,0.37965447,0.6151211,0.0020499327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044131983,0.000019829335,0.00008057262,0.000049611106,0.000012414875,0.0000019992774,0.008754005,6.0572194e-7,0.000007768887,0.006362356,0.9843841,0.00028260643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98576576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93623984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37329212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005715148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056238133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901474831","doi":"10.7202/1070744ar","title":"If It's the Institution That's Causing the Decline, Change the Institution: Comment on Colgan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.3376601811127925,"score_gpt":0.4505502187082927,"score_spread":0.1128900375955002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901474831","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019021178,0.00013090458,0.0001491913,0.95705706,0.0038591786,0.0009926355,0.0000031348252,0.000046819485,0.018739877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72472227,0.00016239494,0.000023709299,0.26867342,0.0060761366,0.00029282214,0.000019126,0.0000065506297,0.000023561888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978534,0.000737697,0.0003363276,0.00025467764,0.0005733087,0.00024460384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836737,0.0007631715,0.00021545566,0.00034730803,0.00020596663,0.0001007311],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001545143,0.00014196348,0.00011025756,0.000067191904,0.0020988928,0.0004111689,0.0004970113,0.00012159831,0.00014069155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020082006,0.000082386345,0.000054262513,0.0013827492,0.0010428337,0.0008843889,0.00007866947,0.00091196544,0.0001278315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002677395,0.00030731256,0.000622336,0.0000063091584,0.000009334024,5.650954e-7,0.099999845,0.00006261123,0.0000043400005,0.86478615,0.028609196,0.0055652107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014061734,0.000036193196,0.0056307134,0.0000389053,0.00002457332,0.0000022379322,0.032069158,0.00015952709,0.00001678302,0.030750427,0.93100524,0.00012560355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033228323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010635547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9023961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033611708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014018267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902649824","doi":"10.3138/9781442660601-016","title":"13. Growing Legal Aid Ontario into the Middle Class: A Proposal for Public Legal Expenses Insurance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Actuarial science; Business; Middle class; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07733204844188152,"score_gpt":0.27966674011973597,"score_spread":0.20233469167785445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902649824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039492885,0.00081329135,0.0000820536,0.003667185,0.00082692207,0.0007951341,0.000035724883,0.000059093818,0.99332565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03268479,0.00009260722,0.0012993894,0.00021524804,0.00044137464,0.0000048797615,0.000024498064,0.000021994072,0.9652152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986513,0.000103245875,0.00022265168,0.00027699288,0.00043268377,0.0003131127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982842,0.00025873212,0.0004420543,0.0003419319,0.0005368652,0.00013619535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005188084,0.00020700667,0.00026013615,0.00003749273,0.0012627575,0.00022171711,0.0007155015,0.00029390297,0.0008158244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104693056,0.00020703387,0.00019480531,0.000004350327,0.00060806924,0.0023312753,0.00013141592,0.00044227598,0.000008936912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007563221,0.000032755313,0.000025440337,0.000028250244,0.000105670995,0.0000016037419,0.12634772,3.378257e-7,0.00001008183,0.8607305,0.006879278,0.005762679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002959459,0.000041260897,0.000044161963,0.0000581157,0.0000907296,0.0000012114882,0.0050410377,0.0000012075217,0.000015091158,0.001161986,0.9930124,0.00023679891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9139191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96573126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98613316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009772085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00355819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9712238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902739474","doi":"","title":"Persons with Disabilities and Justice Making on Canada's Juries - a Followup Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 15-21, 2018)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Public administration; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.047547259881488904,"score_gpt":0.37300413875915356,"score_spread":0.32545687887766467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902739474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8509875,0.00015868402,0.0000071254008,0.042119537,0.002715913,0.00056078023,0.000055746656,0.000067222245,0.10332748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98055017,0.000009432714,0.00020399978,0.0019326537,0.00052772055,0.0000553034,0.0000054138977,0.00001544693,0.016699865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981521,0.00044359008,0.00030216726,0.0003518029,0.00035806003,0.00039228797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973202,0.0016046138,0.0002888228,0.0002984291,0.0003878506,0.00010011055],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072324136,0.00018368823,0.0003041602,0.00013030699,0.0013199889,0.00009489279,0.00029377887,0.000098374585,0.0006397043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013818548,0.00015832864,0.000033972025,0.00035334204,0.003454657,0.00035645164,0.000057453766,0.00039574516,0.000023360895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032066452,0.0006091515,0.16645043,0.00006321476,0.00043840025,0.000009620542,0.3275293,0.000003916936,0.000018673509,0.18038715,0.32295424,0.0012152136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008072434,0.00059806387,0.04054529,0.0000689577,0.00030016163,0.0000027226029,0.44066128,0.000008290906,0.00003184837,0.0018329272,0.51473206,0.00041116716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17983645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83616614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65632963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016091355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903852579","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: The Constitution","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.22927160320117984,"score_gpt":0.4654791525885181,"score_spread":0.23620754938733823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903852579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000040855966,0.00038926423,0.000006613397,0.28645545,0.0034669244,0.0004379458,0.00006809552,0.00010346341,0.7090682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004450847,0.0014984222,0.0007016936,0.015142029,0.003992009,0.00009362679,0.00030666727,0.000025593876,0.9737891],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645334,0.001166121,0.0004786472,0.00033953585,0.0008396172,0.00072274526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686044,0.0011013722,0.00016300472,0.00058443664,0.00090699014,0.00038374958],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044212933,0.0001674717,0.00016319634,0.0006503289,0.0039780145,0.0017330128,0.0013173705,0.00052398996,0.043077543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054469747,0.00012335427,0.00008134288,0.0018110977,0.0017844584,0.0021615862,0.000091927934,0.0019599805,0.0024162533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.836723e-7,0.000008634106,0.000035710473,0.0000035090309,0.000011731678,0.0000034269192,0.002042624,6.0183154e-8,1.0504545e-7,0.47946513,0.51738864,0.0010395566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034117555,0.000010140756,0.00005518499,0.000035858277,0.000014859709,0.0000034653397,0.0110948235,6.989095e-7,0.0000053145595,0.0067432863,0.98183197,0.00017029843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9777691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9104542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47272184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044029756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06247673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903917501","doi":"10.4324/9781315098159-8","title":"Corruption in today’s Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.055435109100460546,"score_gpt":0.35243456549865054,"score_spread":0.29699945639819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903917501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004309986,0.000016996702,0.0000075048442,0.028294351,0.001392492,0.00011201283,0.00000585695,0.000019017947,0.9701087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008839028,0.00004927814,0.00008194719,0.0027404642,0.0005494243,0.0000036367635,0.000024924631,0.000007750397,0.98770356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993159,0.00002103362,0.00016180659,0.00011935851,0.00027108623,0.00011080938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944913,0.000104522296,0.000100302954,0.000105199724,0.00019120351,0.000049631068],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030273094,0.00006806161,0.00007695725,0.00007822609,0.00015207328,0.00006386874,0.00010776147,0.0001446744,0.055151843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021181667,0.00007115244,0.000014779359,0.00006365612,0.000075415905,0.00018314531,0.0000100859925,0.0002759663,0.00040892817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.347427e-7,0.000002904139,0.00002495086,0.0000010918751,0.0000022168435,9.0559644e-7,0.0012253379,7.248626e-8,1.5841688e-7,0.6733985,0.32407,0.0012729514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026059073,0.0000035047624,0.000087329616,0.000012994365,0.0000032989676,2.164824e-7,0.0008247544,7.3882836e-7,4.5548637e-7,0.012659526,0.98628956,0.00009153739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95742506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6622196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053700956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066925217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904272788","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v25i3.769","title":"Law &amp; Entrepreneurship in Global Clinical Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Legal education; Social entrepreneurship; Mindset; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.14565861669136773,"score_gpt":0.5905020535367205,"score_spread":0.44484343684535277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904272788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44000328,0.00014797856,0.00036107877,0.1280315,0.063233145,0.00022663029,0.000007262335,0.000028050177,0.36796108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96166813,0.00020961814,0.0044005946,0.011945609,0.018126497,0.000008143273,0.000021514254,0.000009711358,0.0036101828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994951,0.0012151139,0.0024100728,0.00027513353,0.00092468347,0.00022397407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923144,0.0011211644,0.001604271,0.00024161088,0.00438832,0.00033024154],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006515258,0.00012667153,0.00030754894,0.0002206014,0.00016826543,0.000427632,0.0008528686,0.0002514764,0.0011547506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017264215,0.00012664475,0.00026504637,0.00059725717,0.0006602776,0.0020455949,0.000045146717,0.0008827083,0.00036058016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000232079,0.0027604497,0.1993813,0.0000020820828,0.00005579308,0.000001805953,0.0012493943,0.0000014772631,0.0000030461229,0.56256974,0.04316619,0.19057663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042611404,0.00009035776,0.11650063,0.000076387885,0.00002328459,0.00002411694,0.0013553603,0.0000024379347,0.000005145305,0.021074217,0.86031103,0.0001109059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068549295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011289499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8171449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040087604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01663908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905557790","doi":"","title":"A SURVEY OF CANADIAN JUDGES ABOUT THEIR MEETINGS WITH CHILDREN: BECOMING MORE COMMON BUT STILL CONTENTIOUS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Good practice; Psychology; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07248963929508759,"score_gpt":0.33564688591892394,"score_spread":0.2631572466238363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905557790","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20400584,0.02249706,0.0000038458197,0.6216151,0.0003399541,0.0017956909,0.00041109722,0.000043075448,0.14928834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777957,0.002841529,0.000026803546,0.018352523,0.00006369849,0.000020162583,0.000069401365,0.000013765644,0.00081640563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831265,0.000751889,0.00026947222,0.00014005846,0.00018087898,0.00034504035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982053,0.0003408426,0.00022407962,0.00034019304,0.00044635474,0.00044325204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034123152,0.00011108852,0.00025905692,0.00018184376,0.00080554705,0.00011643087,0.00044524166,0.0000548535,0.0005064699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019724895,0.00007672049,0.000041853942,0.0010672718,0.00030857054,0.00016230594,0.000008663901,0.00026640826,0.000044902885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009645061,0.000055463137,0.49267086,0.00044382375,0.0002784436,0.0000051997176,0.036233947,0.0000070812894,0.000003289424,0.21685226,0.1459478,0.10749219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068208494,0.000011424763,0.2502405,0.00041532458,0.00003823323,0.0000035934763,0.0006139084,0.0000035342769,0.0000013337258,0.000042368163,0.74844635,0.000115237104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7737899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024360907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039656116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7034825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905698313","doi":"10.3968/10442","title":"A Brief Study on Unofficial Petition for Administrative Matters in Chinese Universities and Colleges","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Negotiation; Administration (probate law); Public relations; Reciprocal; Political science; China; Law; Business; Public administration; Process (computing); Computer science","score_opus":0.04490860466614107,"score_gpt":0.4053158937047331,"score_spread":0.36040728903859204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905698313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72979337,0.0000013681104,0.000005840588,0.041395262,0.00035051026,0.0003734409,0.00003070086,0.000010077225,0.22803944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963805,6.076548e-7,0.000029521301,0.002367538,0.00030967593,0.000013679463,0.0000016538482,0.0000023691011,0.0008944293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926394,0.000071605136,0.00007569716,0.00016710606,0.00018358181,0.00023806177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994333,0.00011924485,0.000042124495,0.00004012126,0.00021732459,0.00014791364],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000706908,0.00004953094,0.00005865513,0.00023942554,0.0021105243,0.00021993874,0.00014335033,0.000032360564,0.00007790802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003032232,0.0000538831,0.00000985457,0.0012693177,0.0012375688,0.00051412237,0.0000075397866,0.00007695792,0.000006602534],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037948364,0.000100685036,0.025924541,0.000002284055,0.000004657005,0.000004057671,0.3658674,8.518727e-8,0.000045833774,0.6010689,0.0055956454,0.0013479359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029498473,0.00020174836,0.18136567,0.000005757447,0.0000043236587,2.6846445e-7,0.6385264,0.000005291538,0.000007435986,0.00093519397,0.17852663,0.00012633175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104632206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7333912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62875897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066476746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051528877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906213088","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5277","title":"What Are We Waiting For? It’s Time to Regulate Paralegals in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Statutory law; Economic Justice; Jurisdiction; Duty; Law; Nothing; Public interest; Political science; Confidentiality; Public administration","score_opus":0.10535361073010306,"score_gpt":0.40775622145511653,"score_spread":0.30240261072501345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906213088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26463592,0.00006462296,0.00012501322,0.6298957,0.0024827656,0.0013565421,0.000035520476,0.00004332471,0.10136059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672921,0.000021304086,0.0009378327,0.01266916,0.0009676602,0.00006266748,0.0000037487723,0.000017626935,0.018027902],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874365,0.00008464104,0.00031411464,0.00021390813,0.0003297477,0.00031392602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985252,0.0004586564,0.00018944024,0.00019423872,0.0004735636,0.00015888903],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006545472,0.000087147964,0.00016055674,0.00015364883,0.00023513814,0.00036739898,0.0004702288,0.000050672927,0.0012986045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016257211,0.0000961806,0.000021945789,0.000802437,0.000058578855,0.0016128499,0.00006599418,0.000116199306,0.00017039853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019986821,0.0001235424,0.0038292767,0.00018757192,0.000044112672,0.000005714104,0.045480758,0.0006240424,0.00065101485,0.010880339,0.92306256,0.014911216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016047592,0.000029907893,0.006842457,0.00029018847,0.000038107144,3.2751e-7,0.02130009,0.00017929757,0.00070179853,0.00022348491,0.9700434,0.00019046565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54063064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8591617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7026562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025236158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024358425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906297604","doi":"10.29173/alr1335","title":"Raising the Bar: Maximizing Civility in Alberta Courtrooms","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Incivility; Raising (metalworking); General partnership; Law; Bar (unit); Political science; Sociology; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07295229427646253,"score_gpt":0.3888356265131147,"score_spread":0.31588333223665216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906297604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006439398,0.010439005,0.000016593423,0.24110146,0.0003929333,0.00047251402,4.0204222e-7,0.000010063525,0.7469231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93239224,0.013028587,0.00016461013,0.04498153,0.00010917462,0.00008546645,0.000006791519,0.000014953939,0.009216656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979267,0.0009719012,0.00037835093,0.0002024773,0.00023587745,0.00028468348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702203,0.0022596177,0.00015329146,0.00036847778,0.000103091785,0.00009351581],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002704672,0.000103033075,0.00019817428,0.000020448144,0.00062030304,0.00015470281,0.0002625167,0.00005488167,0.0027246922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01082745,0.00007674772,0.000092115304,0.0007920901,0.00018868994,0.0005965675,0.000017332564,0.00034072218,0.00039157385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.281858e-7,0.00004221594,0.0008710639,0.00006970598,0.0000080703,3.062052e-7,0.002377299,5.508709e-7,9.579403e-7,0.9850154,0.009673992,0.0019397109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000676559,0.0000029974717,0.00016251684,0.0003695458,0.000028232971,0.0000035156697,0.0002562901,0.000001291176,0.0000030438166,0.0034914012,0.99551153,0.000101949954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2167045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3655099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092903734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005792093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99818695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909162287","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2018.25682","title":"Mandatory Reporting of Health Professional Incompetence and Incapacity: Is it Time to Adopt the Australian Regime?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandatory reporting; Public relations; Professional standards; Business; Political science; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Environmental health","score_opus":0.42303517331699064,"score_gpt":0.4649799143239335,"score_spread":0.04194474100694284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909162287","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060337413,0.000034074023,0.000035138873,0.90685666,0.0005572872,0.00022607298,0.0000021833287,0.000026444555,0.03192474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610101,0.0000013059773,0.0012707994,0.01363552,0.00035041617,0.0000050140584,0.0000018927811,0.000005823397,0.023719117],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843675,0.00035419292,0.00048515035,0.00016312323,0.00031589527,0.00024487212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855214,0.00020334007,0.00074094726,0.00016966088,0.00023871602,0.000095166004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003753196,0.00006228563,0.000120911536,0.000070840346,0.0009915811,0.00007666723,0.00015031137,0.00006133599,0.0006714946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002065884,0.000050924114,0.000019446084,0.0004987517,0.0007745739,0.00030041032,0.000010842844,0.0002664884,0.00009932789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023263367,0.00010168507,0.0031620567,0.00003680124,0.000011043332,3.9264546e-7,0.5332926,2.2933779e-7,0.00029495166,0.01241856,0.41462544,0.036032993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011412919,0.00011066102,0.030235,0.00079579063,0.00001351581,0.000008596248,0.29687184,0.000012975778,0.000358209,0.0014486281,0.669868,0.00016264002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008103986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015503532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010760155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010278854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.762654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911695068","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3311712","title":"Canada's Law Societies Need a Civil Service","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil service; Law; Political science; Service (business); Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Public administration; Commercial law; Sociology; Business; Public service","score_opus":0.010974096630318989,"score_gpt":0.2867941685970908,"score_spread":0.2758200719667718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911695068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09185227,0.00054608134,0.00007575003,0.4488621,0.0014479585,0.00016521449,0.0000030381418,0.000039213035,0.45700836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9497946,0.00034463566,0.000022438968,0.01280941,0.0004249103,0.0000025729878,0.000002503661,0.000008489991,0.036590472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980162,0.00013855331,0.00015788118,0.00009249883,0.0004115437,0.0011833182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924994,0.000117269126,0.00013426627,0.0000961206,0.00032324684,0.00007914073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016731606,0.00006871709,0.00008225046,0.00003239694,0.0007397784,0.00019775744,0.00025862711,0.000055355496,0.0008876544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010009369,0.00006674143,0.000035754052,0.00045885475,0.00003884743,0.00055400236,0.000012952836,0.001771634,0.000123198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053445924,0.000017510298,0.00043624744,0.0000021807648,0.000036184963,1.9941952e-7,0.0034188663,0.0000068911104,0.000034024597,0.97998947,0.015544215,0.00050889514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015498279,0.000018429198,0.00012506403,0.000004675294,0.000009443503,0.000015160145,0.06589137,0.0000060713205,0.0000062355443,0.087673165,0.84600365,0.00009172677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91868687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99689865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8923163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017014182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06029879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9719193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911722754","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1313","title":"Physicians, Nurse Practitioners and ODSP Applications: Towards a New Model of Partnership with Community Legal Clinics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; General partnership; Health professionals; Health care; Work (physics); Nursing; Test (biology); Order (exchange); Legal profession; Task (project management); Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Business; Law; Psychiatry; Management","score_opus":0.10815991247699112,"score_gpt":0.4601460141389525,"score_spread":0.35198610166196137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911722754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28638577,0.00011074368,0.0036967732,0.26635712,0.00017735762,0.00039363376,0.000028398617,0.0000288825,0.4428213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99081975,0.00008430232,0.0015713283,0.0047050803,0.0020146747,0.0000026294817,0.0000020268578,0.0000056658578,0.0007945575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911755,0.00023949218,0.0002592902,0.000048601538,0.00022208923,0.00011294606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867445,0.00012625859,0.0005277147,0.000065984896,0.00051686604,0.00008869631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008659822,0.000058509122,0.00014902648,0.00006777578,0.00091280765,0.000117932745,0.00010768907,0.00007168656,0.0000077450295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016364476,0.00005208959,0.000034778648,0.00026190587,0.0008458858,0.0008580677,0.000010365688,0.00038864266,9.555059e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000547957,0.00013423899,0.00006758037,0.000010250896,0.000032208627,1.0268389e-7,0.07999711,0.0000014476442,0.000030671486,0.9093389,0.0021017091,0.008230966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009543359,0.00034211768,0.00096913375,0.00004859703,0.0001351934,0.000009922931,0.08213995,0.000042686384,0.000067765475,0.09161078,0.8234972,0.0001823532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018327551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030914587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82139546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048026304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022144187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911956292","doi":"","title":"Graduate Study in Criminology and Criminal Justice: A Program Guide","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Section (typography); Political science; Brick and mortar; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Business; Computer science; History; World Wide Web; Advertising; The Internet","score_opus":0.2736474296258677,"score_gpt":0.49195910902165485,"score_spread":0.21831167939578716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911956292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003008637,0.00003749164,0.000017387363,0.010005158,0.00072262564,0.0010165265,0.000001417968,0.00010755406,0.9850832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016380984,0.00006790524,0.0011336976,0.001386044,0.0005664531,0.00015448642,0.000018682375,0.000016413167,0.98027533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984192,0.00030803477,0.00037174503,0.00031709234,0.0003154065,0.00026851048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998795,0.00045348058,0.00018332277,0.0001934617,0.00028550735,0.000089233996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012757081,0.0001509932,0.00023124999,0.00027409667,0.00032212227,0.00023195172,0.00020925757,0.00022467686,0.00051746535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012391687,0.00014561384,0.000025239297,0.00013058873,0.0002817535,0.00023228941,0.000049845297,0.0007206735,0.00012482116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010225803,0.00054743444,0.00020519624,0.00008256015,0.000025914487,0.000011606412,0.05713324,1.8295258e-7,1.8148812e-7,0.5629463,0.31551638,0.06352076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019658136,0.00017226372,0.0013257562,0.000015298292,0.00026260273,0.0000024315991,0.028113352,0.000004452542,9.3001304e-8,0.006087442,0.9636429,0.00017683169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008013125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02419109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6481265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017391377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002398536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912581125","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2018.1551677","title":"Governance gone wrong: examining self-regulation of the legal profession","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Duty of loyalty; Statutory law; Accountability; Duty; Legal profession; Loyalty; Law; Duty of care; Function (biology); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Fiduciary; Management","score_opus":0.09074423956251462,"score_gpt":0.41846229647802713,"score_spread":0.3277180569155125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912581125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3231573,0.00005390381,0.0006569835,0.2878861,0.005207813,0.00043274023,0.000007291325,0.00013912575,0.38245872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97575045,0.00001822448,0.0011502567,0.0017935771,0.0007566336,0.000007638782,0.0000020472307,0.000008241344,0.020512948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982408,0.0005335388,0.0002448438,0.00014801502,0.0006566202,0.0001761747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982553,0.00045577102,0.00034434875,0.00024972015,0.00065672403,0.00003809449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021055406,0.00007098922,0.00008166511,0.000024225417,0.0011451461,0.00016452478,0.0002880489,0.0002313242,0.00021933005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036341029,0.0000557338,0.00003121707,0.00075203454,0.00048286162,0.0014751498,0.000053830965,0.0009900371,0.000039074035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009952955,0.00006468502,0.0011698059,0.000014137243,0.000008702189,1.08764915e-7,0.049418326,0.0000028273464,0.0015036606,0.9432669,0.0030516388,0.001489206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013285123,0.000034494566,0.061816897,0.000071199356,0.000017459517,9.879838e-7,0.0048919693,0.00007411567,0.0024329475,0.0017924744,0.9286319,0.00010268824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00836451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055347416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011534791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023227711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99823886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912979748","doi":"","title":"LAWYERS’ MONOPOLY? THINK AGAIN:: THE REALITY OF NON-LAWYER LEGAL SERVICE PROVISION IN CANADA","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Legal ethics; Legal profession; Law; Statute; Practice of law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Public interest; Legal advice; Duty; Legal research; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.05613086201205925,"score_gpt":0.3658218807234167,"score_spread":0.30969101871135746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912979748","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057078376,0.0023763068,0.0000014225895,0.8401634,0.00041013444,0.00076368195,0.000021917504,0.000005655838,0.15054965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9116609,0.0020944707,0.00002455324,0.08480051,0.00020120289,0.000023570698,0.000008062123,0.0000074389513,0.0011793056],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853283,0.00049534114,0.0002931367,0.00012270686,0.00029113397,0.0002648243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869287,0.00018607946,0.00016429742,0.00042820745,0.00036993317,0.00015864203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024778836,0.000076711614,0.00014734275,0.000032139094,0.00072404445,0.00006543853,0.00055799645,0.00003746562,0.0008483187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007270876,0.000048041205,0.00002661974,0.0010710867,0.00018046104,0.00024791044,0.000019385725,0.00029168703,0.00007841976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063592684,0.00002515565,0.0010389541,0.0003576078,0.000029533556,0.000004756447,0.027380161,0.0000033431313,0.0000076129436,0.30008674,0.6364096,0.03465017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003585139,0.0000048872753,0.0038062537,0.00025397755,0.000015850967,9.560439e-7,0.002044758,0.000021497688,0.0000048765996,0.0003213031,0.9934242,0.00006558946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90595305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008799475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024188627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913307065","doi":"10.15402/esj.v4i1.322","title":"Wahkohtowin as Paideia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paideia; Socratic method; Greeks; Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Space (punctuation); Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Action (physics); Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Classics; Political science; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.25408097306900657,"score_gpt":0.5051165789936986,"score_spread":0.251035605924692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913307065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8413389,0.00025703182,0.00023937348,0.01436779,0.00050347665,0.00015577736,6.092718e-7,0.00015683485,0.14298022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97913647,0.00027728942,0.00298049,0.00069586316,0.0015934984,0.00000881891,0.000006344705,0.000037461803,0.015263772],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.3032194,0.6947922,0.00030701826,0.00015428537,0.00091628643,0.0006108227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65294313,0.34440237,0.00023387611,0.00045105265,0.0013201743,0.0006493698],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.90749985,0.00017612644,0.00021343197,0.00074115983,0.76490086,0.003930433,0.00082837354,0.0002121794,0.0012279733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9205216,0.00017031482,0.00008091661,0.0009702969,0.0009363679,0.0027373813,0.00024167143,0.7809437,0.000389164],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003906799,0.00013911299,0.0009999909,0.0000085145875,0.000045123183,0.000010419548,0.94813836,0.0000051624734,0.0020186384,0.0017098871,0.006292376,0.040593334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021554837,0.0001901948,0.0015540142,0.000062786305,0.000006721878,0.000042070067,0.5406194,0.000017080107,0.000031048527,0.00092588336,0.45622116,0.00011413099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012393167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009153748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7807315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002721766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011195628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913556084","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6838","title":"Whistleblowing in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Language change; Scope (computer science); Private sector; Public sector; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Political science; Business; Public administration; Law; Enforcement","score_opus":0.0530688293364164,"score_gpt":0.38527286743457756,"score_spread":0.3322040380981612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913556084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9305238,0.00089566305,0.0000024768449,0.043971635,0.0021006204,0.00004781992,4.975713e-7,0.00000231259,0.022455174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957601,0.0001588323,0.000056223096,0.000890325,0.00020317745,6.6402237e-7,8.2970445e-8,0.0000028602765,0.002927757],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991372,0.00009614129,0.00028382524,0.00004710103,0.00030777557,0.00012795463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919456,0.00024301649,0.00020232046,0.000045385197,0.00027449214,0.000040247214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006497725,0.0000437259,0.00014534235,0.00006948389,0.00010060247,0.000056178065,0.00012808511,0.0000132314935,0.000103294245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000476074,0.000037378715,0.000024127192,0.00025259715,0.00003103965,0.0007378723,0.000014376957,0.00024929328,0.000016538886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001837342,0.00003581519,0.94787645,0.000013917072,0.00007880816,0.00003622401,0.032840215,0.000065793974,0.00004605316,0.00675832,0.009704145,0.002525894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020925485,0.000020890317,0.06387351,0.000059915543,0.000007712293,0.000007772249,0.06344938,6.3380355e-7,0.000014199816,0.0001149243,0.8721777,0.00006409114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79624265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97845644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8840029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062726415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034554286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6129782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913770042","doi":"10.5958/2348-1773.2018.00006.1","title":"Assessment of Use and Utilisation of Library Resources, Services and Facilities by Law Students at Kristu Jayanti College of Law, Bangalore","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Horizon College and Seminary","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Law; Library science; Business; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.024204077021458787,"score_gpt":0.3314269666796175,"score_spread":0.30722288965815875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913770042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9304043,0.000048325575,0.00011187559,0.0017453664,0.00014509048,0.0002173518,0.00012147871,0.0000053350986,0.06720087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666965,0.0002505542,0.001882043,0.00037265097,0.000024669649,0.0000016515417,0.000013825523,0.0000020545879,0.000782885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986232,0.000092707836,0.0006349791,0.000037480506,0.00054529565,0.00006633915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983481,0.000100151214,0.0010469898,0.00007629375,0.00038734725,0.00004107453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008286103,0.00005428521,0.00013205854,0.00016091611,0.00019998192,0.000112541886,0.00013959341,0.000034640827,0.00012470198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031352312,0.00004833002,0.000022751452,0.00020231886,0.00025483896,0.004751193,0.000083582854,0.000065151726,8.8106935e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013667314,0.00023336463,0.108824536,0.00094361644,0.00025659113,5.038416e-7,0.101578295,0.0000148386,0.000087233915,0.76990366,0.016280409,0.0017402995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005487254,0.00014841025,0.13193408,0.00011048429,0.000046666788,0.0000012168043,0.06444615,0.00005826874,0.0002669071,0.00060189,0.8017755,0.00006171467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009070551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002503391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7854951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003640013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043678174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34445003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914197159","doi":"","title":"Developments in the Legal Profession: Lizotte, Alberta and Green and the Growing Power of Privilege and Professional Regulators","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Law; Privilege (computing); Statutory law; Political science; Legislature; Supreme court; Legal profession","score_opus":0.013533513104054774,"score_gpt":0.33894501746162237,"score_spread":0.3254115043575676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914197159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82870644,0.00044383202,0.000004281479,0.16277902,0.00024627018,0.00020422306,2.8394788e-7,0.000001982269,0.0076136705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942845,0.0005576514,0.000030989315,0.0005370309,0.0000976507,0.000008301722,3.5508788e-7,0.000004200101,0.0044792914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859476,0.00037415326,0.00020394492,0.000099311466,0.00026944766,0.00045839668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991455,0.0003456438,0.00028229994,0.000115531126,0.00007517416,0.000035871708],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004902116,0.00006717412,0.0000981876,0.000050462077,0.0019643228,0.00022090768,0.00026648224,0.000056803907,0.000011173373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007826517,0.000036621917,0.000015581778,0.000108369146,0.00044683053,0.0014031489,0.00006567188,0.0011711977,5.4703537e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043636788,0.00002599747,0.031031093,0.0000035333917,0.000022735987,4.3493282e-7,0.026116928,2.3021682e-8,0.000012674899,0.93647826,0.000094308605,0.0061703683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002661114,0.00008015627,0.49048376,0.00018464317,0.00004268957,0.00022041523,0.16332598,0.000007934625,0.000017798293,0.21836233,0.124381304,0.00023186208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047577475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017942559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7181159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007201697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027783455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914663746","doi":"10.1017/s1472669600002218","title":"Old Wine in New Bottles ***or Canadian Conference with a difference","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Bursary; Work (physics); Political science; Library science; Association (psychology); Law; Engineering; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03553709044774885,"score_gpt":0.31266349549949457,"score_spread":0.27712640505174574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914663746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004469494,0.000004673425,0.0041560507,0.051389296,0.00024622583,0.00048363124,0.0000037657358,0.00004549878,0.93920135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241748,0.0000321093,0.0039344295,0.0061997348,0.000043120635,0.000035455854,0.000022564034,0.0000036548272,0.065554164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991046,0.00006253725,0.00023195705,0.000080754486,0.0002648336,0.0002552998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994554,0.00003478025,0.000094528135,0.00013576567,0.00010608532,0.00017342094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037182693,0.00008057707,0.00007172564,0.00031334825,0.00025025406,0.0005963817,0.00015340133,0.000039389703,0.0015676976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017079916,0.00006777339,0.000010704528,0.00086696725,0.000050139563,0.0027996306,0.000008809087,0.00015979016,0.0002120083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001034887,0.000015540496,0.0011744987,0.000010375223,0.000007814996,0.0000025364689,0.009512832,0.000041736934,2.3652206e-7,0.96882915,0.012272356,0.008122554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029491697,0.000017818924,0.010837867,0.00002264424,0.0000056767235,0.000001058118,0.011365524,0.000044346838,0.0000038008911,0.0008888461,0.9764064,0.000111103174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38258988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66792595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96794033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023633854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018781715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914856190","doi":"10.22230/ijepl.2019v14n8a861","title":"Good Governance and Canadian universities: Fiduciary duties of university governing boards and their implications for shared collegial governance.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Corporate governance; Corporation; Legislation; Corporate law; Law; Legal research; Political science; Public administration; Business; Accounting; Duty; Finance","score_opus":0.06922632407415372,"score_gpt":0.34594835853400424,"score_spread":0.27672203445985055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914856190","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45135054,0.0017186039,0.00011002187,0.48213193,0.0018037511,0.0003731838,0.0008529331,0.000010594433,0.06164845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865111,0.00058946665,0.00026830367,0.0013485806,0.00049679517,0.0000010696331,0.000011262755,0.000004978533,0.010768423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993608,0.000086267864,0.00018642891,0.000104103616,0.00013116265,0.00013123523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809355,0.00059700967,0.0004344175,0.00006078906,0.000676479,0.00013775272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004275839,0.000072190436,0.00011491471,0.00017955547,0.00023551016,0.000102834514,0.00020086142,0.00006910892,0.00013408819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063254806,0.00007707847,0.00003829285,0.00020981078,0.00019198329,0.0009921361,0.000016882641,0.00015086737,0.0000010581455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011362264,0.00006268058,0.016108163,0.00003192848,0.00010150313,2.1051451e-7,0.038668502,0.000005194484,0.00008240098,0.92559534,0.012459268,0.006771157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004324056,0.000045159013,0.10505404,0.000086215376,0.00001802756,0.00001589945,0.12719584,0.000010371726,0.000018386028,0.0022159633,0.76481384,0.00009388479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051822532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016595284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9233794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066431505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916175080","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v8i1.780","title":"Editorial 8(1)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.09329351313903278,"score_gpt":0.5109924127027974,"score_spread":0.4176988995637646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916175080","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005821249,0.00012011281,0.0013063004,0.25636262,0.67602825,0.00019044093,0.000040809708,0.000033050583,0.06009717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48990202,0.00007265268,0.0045985733,0.0017679216,0.49111342,0.00006189828,0.000069831796,0.000011794794,0.012401883],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830407,0.00013682157,0.0003176886,0.00010027684,0.0008318116,0.00030933865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554807,0.0009325815,0.00023195702,0.000080001584,0.00292854,0.00027883597],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00234417,0.000088443056,0.00007916367,0.00019161539,0.00079869945,0.0005168287,0.0005058608,0.00012653721,0.0030642187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070367497,0.000086556895,0.00012519865,0.00018373142,0.000118478885,0.0022685216,0.000020700063,0.00075378333,0.00023234556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024268726,0.00024074242,0.0037395554,6.5814993e-7,0.000037247628,3.0586694e-8,0.0033716336,6.3864036e-7,0.000021777216,0.40528256,0.585736,0.0015449233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019141694,0.000009629203,0.0022601043,0.000008224685,0.000011690578,0.000017299353,0.0027976532,0.0000020742973,0.000026045213,0.03919022,0.95538384,0.00010177786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084238505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012371164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4840808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006015339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002611545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99784714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917351143","doi":"","title":"Learning, Teaching & Practising Systemic Advocacy in Legal Clinics: A Conversation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Sociology; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.04070611120915998,"score_gpt":0.44216053812495226,"score_spread":0.4014544269157923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917351143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7713203,0.000033256056,0.00008823412,0.07620375,0.00066716655,0.00008581267,4.9501983e-7,0.0000140430075,0.15158695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99138504,0.000048887498,0.0001561433,0.0023462388,0.005395987,6.47091e-7,5.325573e-7,0.000005302344,0.00066119415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985748,0.0006104948,0.000377549,0.00006238735,0.0002259346,0.0001488552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880296,0.00023164642,0.00059250684,0.000027773352,0.00028967034,0.000055428958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026380867,0.000050946306,0.00013327289,0.00016159442,0.00088696246,0.00026445967,0.00007900795,0.00009127499,0.00003002092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018679922,0.000050858118,0.00004111761,0.00019287464,0.00023118583,0.0013768811,0.000011379458,0.0006807332,0.000008475215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002876474,0.000047329617,0.0016482132,0.0000072713406,0.000013866458,0.0000023995938,0.3034747,6.911413e-7,0.000073666575,0.6855172,0.0006185795,0.008567333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053652143,0.00013557961,0.0024353745,0.00005429895,0.000019805404,0.00003562067,0.10260423,0.000014030234,0.0000064919454,0.0038183518,0.8902456,0.00009407388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029856011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014848481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88962704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019480324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016782259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9766043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917477694","doi":"10.29242/lawstats.2007-2008","title":"ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 2007-2008","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ARL academic law and medical library statistics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Academic library; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.024236059519532574,"score_gpt":0.33584547979302926,"score_spread":0.3116094202734967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917477694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004264946,0.004072383,0.0019478559,0.05388154,0.0019929868,0.00060630776,0.004943246,0.0004609378,0.93209046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00016111742,0.05124351,0.01676916,0.13054496,0.0065651904,0.00003138466,0.0057199146,0.0001483129,0.78881645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411225,0.0005709016,0.0014798483,0.00081211195,0.0020189467,0.0010059533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925001,0.004438382,0.00080748287,0.0003930749,0.0001251089,0.0017358261],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009100291,0.00061966304,0.0007863983,0.00019497526,0.0011210066,0.0004350704,0.0012415259,0.0030757277,0.014875564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018753833,0.0006139355,0.00008410741,0.00041523864,0.0029007285,0.0039007587,0.00030318898,0.008741818,0.00058725115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000152157645,0.000027574075,0.000031706833,0.000060197803,0.000033312655,0.00005338685,0.00084566575,1.04058756e-7,1.255903e-7,0.49913093,0.4904185,0.009383278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002633322,0.000056133405,0.000033087803,0.0002652848,0.00010591847,0.000017819466,0.00014558293,0.000029333696,0.0000015530482,0.35811594,0.64050186,0.0004641836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005048547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000115866744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15008333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011203316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0105623435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918006290","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Lexis Library: How to use Lexis Library: Lexis Library - non-UK jurisdictions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Legislation; Library science; Law library; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06800933960480272,"score_gpt":0.3541410719504015,"score_spread":0.2861317323455988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918006290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020276212,0.00030332097,0.00010448223,0.39999127,0.006307016,0.0011897783,0.0012396782,0.001702274,0.58895946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049184817,0.0058647497,0.019656228,0.03806892,0.010161371,0.00042327182,0.003455553,0.00046746084,0.91698396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932948,0.0006854121,0.0013023232,0.0016875673,0.0014842267,0.0015457212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99212015,0.0020749941,0.0014096209,0.0026523548,0.00034058225,0.0014022962],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061597495,0.0011137965,0.001162573,0.0017430809,0.0050439895,0.022016048,0.003960887,0.0017111056,0.04873994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00333667,0.0011039203,0.0006581012,0.0030952813,0.0010323793,0.045953818,0.0011500029,0.0026378122,0.0027136889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003983866,0.00022079119,0.0018811395,0.00006700695,0.00020840172,0.000023999404,0.007649279,0.000002475092,0.0000047651247,0.11399102,0.87338674,0.0025245617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003101415,0.00013746844,0.0012729211,0.00037954908,0.0001617582,0.0000064830274,0.0029406876,0.0000071549052,0.00017407515,0.0031599696,0.9900536,0.00139622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01607389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014958442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36192235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015801215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022027519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918008470","doi":"10.29242/lawstats.2020","title":"ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 2020","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ARL academic law and medical library statistics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Library science; Academic library; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.024121140067447918,"score_gpt":0.3357921110227385,"score_spread":0.31167097095529056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918008470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000060410093,0.0030012482,0.0009647377,0.07114738,0.0028900176,0.0006144917,0.011959241,0.00042395067,0.9089929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00022287431,0.04436522,0.009339022,0.10919953,0.0047914465,0.00008528615,0.00998022,0.00018017807,0.82183623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939508,0.0007660331,0.0013526682,0.0008150192,0.0022532772,0.000862243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99176645,0.005528846,0.00077787274,0.00037205854,0.00007921589,0.0014755826],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010096091,0.00053837756,0.00070209196,0.00014950981,0.0015691108,0.0003780553,0.0013760292,0.001973119,0.055747785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018349447,0.00055539113,0.00008090594,0.00050282385,0.0026154646,0.003204257,0.0007245965,0.0105761085,0.00032746908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016774522,0.000023396005,0.000043772154,0.00007875909,0.000042639578,0.00006906466,0.00133757,1.4238803e-7,1.52732e-7,0.505356,0.48805305,0.0049786894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024619946,0.00005315726,0.000015680514,0.00012321999,0.000109963206,0.000018254284,0.00040560807,0.00003372599,9.979218e-7,0.32728046,0.6712748,0.00043793806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059315504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011856859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18322174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013807173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011341597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918030793","doi":"10.29242/lawstats.2011-2012","title":"ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 2011-2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ARL academic law and medical library statistics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Library science; Academic library; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02644343558490157,"score_gpt":0.3288888503161185,"score_spread":0.3024454147312169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918030793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008204043,0.004122987,0.002159272,0.06135596,0.0027774472,0.00077401026,0.0063028163,0.00043970786,0.9220596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00017990283,0.038567092,0.01400754,0.075778805,0.0051785777,0.000072550094,0.0052665877,0.00017201318,0.86077696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431807,0.0005858563,0.0014368349,0.0007848238,0.0018686311,0.0010058018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916266,0.0051193796,0.0008429095,0.00041664048,0.00014116064,0.001853272],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083739404,0.0006133753,0.00076262536,0.00018467312,0.0010387383,0.0004913443,0.001285862,0.003121178,0.04862501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012546062,0.00058431335,0.000079071484,0.00026849742,0.0033033818,0.006322609,0.00046726465,0.008381213,0.0022116674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009170987,0.000022491931,0.000040899937,0.00008653837,0.00004203607,0.0000204107,0.0008688724,3.9771663e-8,2.4604788e-7,0.49996915,0.49214226,0.0067978813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023207812,0.00003841303,0.000032084852,0.0002016111,0.00010641669,0.000011833094,0.00017792937,0.000031402615,0.0000017861375,0.3504135,0.6482914,0.00046152205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010335103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013860404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15614918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094104515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008389063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918245904","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of a Mixed Methods Study in Work-Integrated Learning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Tshwane University of Technology; University of Waterloo; University of Surrey; Curtin University of Technology; Griffith University; University of Cincinnati; Deakin University; University of South Africa; University of Wollongong; Michigan State University; Flinders University; University of New England; Massey University; Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand; Southern Cross University; Queensland University of Technology; University of Waikato; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Multimethodology; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Research design; Conceptual framework; Management science; Computer science; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Pedagogy; Social science","score_opus":0.22022480064917296,"score_gpt":0.530850877902698,"score_spread":0.3106260772535251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918245904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97904927,0.000042262338,0.00045268115,0.012697008,0.00057029346,0.00090911274,0.000022407967,0.00007563921,0.0061813407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95916665,0.00009168594,0.0029949644,0.0000105753625,0.0003160613,0.000005017257,0.000024928839,0.000014247274,0.037375856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98967093,0.0075865276,0.0004215907,0.00042669688,0.0010868557,0.0008074084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99440837,0.0023427042,0.00025373508,0.00040179372,0.0023811373,0.00021225288],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010730581,0.00017127734,0.00026695873,0.00086254254,0.0020282196,0.0001967993,0.000889193,0.00021578667,0.00028884664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046977745,0.00014489688,0.00007505952,0.0069802906,0.0014863997,0.00058678497,0.00020524484,0.0020589991,0.00007200296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015717279,0.0030388627,0.8132587,0.000030754716,0.00024821496,0.000055023385,0.052579064,0.0001292019,0.00029423056,0.06353173,0.033858124,0.031404346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088443485,0.00044010393,0.38799313,0.0000579585,0.000025647303,0.0000010878347,0.25033653,0.000047928537,0.000024609462,0.00032897745,0.359679,0.00018059318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11009806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24288571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42526558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009308101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022299082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919054898","doi":"10.7202/1056295ar","title":"Le droit moral de l’auteur au Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Auteur theory; Philosophy; Sociology; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.01938942912338517,"score_gpt":0.27457656322370827,"score_spread":0.2551871341003231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919054898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37384376,0.000302308,0.000107258784,0.14247009,0.0038418095,0.00023686342,0.000063834574,0.000037453443,0.47909665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79734105,0.000090263995,0.0006291637,0.0033601136,0.0013707079,0.000017133054,0.000035679277,0.000023663137,0.1971322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803144,0.00024093721,0.00033588446,0.0003073091,0.00029413987,0.0007902994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861676,0.00030717938,0.0002261179,0.00035816157,0.00016848587,0.00032328357],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082294684,0.0001243992,0.00022730861,0.00006868671,0.00042314723,0.00016579543,0.00041586027,0.00020350935,0.0027917344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046496946,0.00022707884,0.000092740775,0.0009378514,0.00015883197,0.00080958765,0.000039216586,0.0006308642,0.0008166246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007075308,0.00012214895,0.036489047,0.000100749894,0.000034897796,0.000024190003,0.0050619766,0.00023685476,0.000057473822,0.9188333,0.035021953,0.004010305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024517573,0.000027786029,0.01828875,0.00008747421,0.00004045648,0.000050918396,0.0046090772,0.0005743931,0.000066880355,0.03338076,0.94231564,0.0003127003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97337836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94366807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9072937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027680094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028201176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919390937","doi":"","title":"Where Do Mediators (and Mediation) Fit in the Regulatory Scheme Governing Lawyers? Unexplored and Unintended Consequences of Treating Mediators as Courts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Unintended consequences; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05483627906673601,"score_gpt":0.33921810793198404,"score_spread":0.28438182886524804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919390937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87045777,0.0001239659,0.0000041936432,0.020005502,0.00007729197,0.00025941967,0.00003626592,0.000026430558,0.10900915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922811,0.0011655494,0.00014796593,0.000037860696,0.00004734736,4.2961332e-7,0.0000056787944,0.0000063249618,0.006307746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997703,0.00061848474,0.00016951126,0.00030472543,0.0008468969,0.00035736183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974373,0.0014918465,0.00021504129,0.00019339858,0.0004420303,0.0002204103],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017710857,0.000115805684,0.00017198735,0.00064856757,0.000982913,0.00007779087,0.00040870384,0.00015157925,0.0003107199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013395412,0.00009789446,0.00004142556,0.0015046601,0.0030138355,0.0015714151,0.00012952455,0.00039855993,0.000009421514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112937036,0.00007161311,0.07930882,0.000022193053,0.000044943805,0.00015729005,0.026386043,4.1917087e-7,0.00068094354,0.8875845,0.004775599,0.00085470255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015824264,0.000113641254,0.018809067,0.00013510825,0.000035695964,0.0000059880517,0.67681307,0.000006243794,0.00019575607,0.0035466808,0.29848832,0.00026800454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005792245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009020398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8840378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021309705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016383495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920400168","doi":"","title":"CANADA’S LEGAL PROFESSION: SELF-REGULATING IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Public interest; Privilege (computing); Law; Political science; Value (mathematics); Legal ethics; Legislature; State (computer science); Self-interest; Sociology","score_opus":0.16847896868102122,"score_gpt":0.40049127442613547,"score_spread":0.23201230574511425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920400168","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083355815,0.00461121,2.4992622e-7,0.86360604,0.00047602723,0.00040911694,0.0000025290203,0.000009681637,0.13005157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92468613,0.0005973606,0.00003166095,0.07181638,0.00024187767,0.000047625424,0.000006864007,0.000005330668,0.0025667567],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981751,0.0009839266,0.00020079655,0.000087324814,0.00028359788,0.00026928177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990427,0.00016868483,0.000091522634,0.0002573641,0.00019439908,0.00024533094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003995933,0.000060877,0.00009109778,0.000039665607,0.00072573835,0.00023328362,0.0005376062,0.000031110456,0.00039765087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002574632,0.00003583118,0.000018704848,0.0007854469,0.00006502272,0.00036102426,0.000013625412,0.0003763761,0.00006978221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.5239422e-7,0.000004463224,0.00019179919,0.0000207599,0.0000028627358,0.000002879691,0.003571443,5.6608723e-8,2.0163007e-8,0.4892849,0.50281453,0.0041060974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029713268,0.0000022575116,0.0003574134,0.00016858065,0.00000837506,0.0000054646634,0.004946677,0.0000024079284,5.7565494e-8,0.00029935784,0.9941262,0.00005346469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99996114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92385256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009525517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04570749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9597025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920839095","doi":"","title":"AM I MY PARTNER’S KEEPER? THE DUTY TO REPORT A COLLEAGUE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Obligation; Duty; Law; Misconduct; Competence (human resources); Legal ethics; Political science; Professional conduct; Ethical code; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.1834431340006346,"score_gpt":0.44039089624611255,"score_spread":0.25694776224547794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920839095","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002324596,0.0047913664,0.0000023737575,0.69659036,0.00042563275,0.00061531004,0.0000049095383,0.000015281115,0.29732227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40989092,0.0075142197,0.00021535195,0.4007312,0.001541709,0.00052695756,0.00003580829,0.000030584306,0.17951325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864364,0.0004609179,0.00023305217,0.00012301083,0.00028838855,0.00025096568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983965,0.00014368285,0.00010504496,0.00046414035,0.0003647339,0.00052587374],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046583605,0.00006615662,0.00011801093,0.000032883247,0.001046476,0.0001855598,0.00042917146,0.000034454024,0.001499158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059498893,0.000038993032,0.000042720632,0.0009657901,0.00013602135,0.00014272238,0.000016386752,0.00022009588,0.0022541776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.4899568e-7,0.0000038384096,0.00011651155,0.000009881417,0.000006257874,0.0000075042776,0.0053526754,6.017986e-7,7.827737e-8,0.13753001,0.85345066,0.00352156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021331036,0.000004985122,0.00025324983,0.00008583188,0.000024948231,0.000018943163,0.0016042765,5.015791e-7,2.497914e-7,0.000647334,0.99727327,0.00006506821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55468214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89294714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40965846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040772159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008569992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921482455","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500006053","title":"Cultural Competence and the Legal Profession: An Annotated Bibliography of Materials Published Between 2000 and 2011","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Core competency; Competence (human resources); Cultural competence; Legal profession; Sociology; Psychology; Public relations; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering ethics; Political science; Linguistics; Social psychology; Engineering; Business; Marketing; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04336920101461978,"score_gpt":0.36163975756481936,"score_spread":0.3182705565501996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921482455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9447597,0.000068120324,0.00023758804,0.030649142,0.0015872499,0.00021357868,0.000039619936,0.000015523481,0.022429438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978293,0.00042772258,0.0008795533,0.0005014348,0.00027053463,0.0000034043774,0.000026419895,0.0000024156777,0.000059206934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983925,0.00023987195,0.0007022152,0.000049410814,0.00052022375,0.000095734016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966391,0.00013555665,0.0010329905,0.000065415334,0.002035814,0.00009114497],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019238389,0.00007242256,0.00014660381,0.0015658463,0.0001975645,0.00075702777,0.00033036986,0.000059399394,0.00039359397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046289992,0.00004713649,0.000036701338,0.00095100625,0.0004060105,0.018623432,0.00003604763,0.00023031344,0.000004379094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019028226,0.0002602577,0.041054722,0.000045311026,0.00053639535,0.0000058298424,0.19509657,0.000006798458,0.00090512965,0.7005337,0.04576172,0.013890737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005022742,0.00039417675,0.45070443,0.00020189032,0.00016041375,0.00019792093,0.06342792,0.00007862031,0.0045623193,0.009742984,0.46508467,0.0004219003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070350785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008672373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6907907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001965811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003590242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921538605","doi":"","title":"BEYOND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST TO THE DUTY OF LOYALTY:FROM MARTIN V. GRAY TO R. V. NEIL","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Loyalty; Ambivalence; Supreme court; Gray (unit); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08474684672615154,"score_gpt":0.3647161061434266,"score_spread":0.279969259417275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921538605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020530794,0.005434608,0.0000073991096,0.8417827,0.0003427786,0.00076941925,0.00008893896,0.00000717643,0.13103618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563261,0.0005813696,0.00009177409,0.038161155,0.00021267336,0.00002936183,0.000012841014,0.0000071767763,0.0045775175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990458,0.0002646856,0.00028882863,0.0000907652,0.00014226159,0.0001676744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895763,0.00018770146,0.00013785367,0.00032052287,0.00022526163,0.00017100107],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012683246,0.000059056907,0.00014545192,0.000045905115,0.00026243515,0.000045991128,0.00041999907,0.000027339174,0.0017581534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012065865,0.000037734808,0.00004343341,0.0007260701,0.00011052854,0.00007536191,0.000017707865,0.00012679788,0.00029709717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025139923,0.00001600468,0.00065226713,0.000055157216,0.000012287416,4.783241e-7,0.005662588,0.0000028322474,0.000025704056,0.4719516,0.5111222,0.01049637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019766752,0.000010146028,0.0042726076,0.00020036558,0.000022672994,2.403129e-7,0.00031628556,2.9773543e-7,0.000023791137,0.0011419154,0.993945,0.00004688855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85862905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9718819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9357953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010303121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011455346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921675498","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v3i0.430","title":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal Volume 3","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.06368009170082004,"score_gpt":0.40575597411013314,"score_spread":0.3420758824093131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921675498","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05279179,0.009949761,0.0004211764,0.79544586,0.02054347,0.0005011302,0.000007315598,0.00018470334,0.12015478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84146714,0.02318202,0.0011568668,0.0040238183,0.0039193057,0.000015608623,0.0000031425725,0.00005612691,0.12617597],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401736,0.0011802599,0.0012942287,0.0004698884,0.0017992116,0.0012390225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994094,0.0008608563,0.001274219,0.00035494025,0.0029031818,0.00051279966],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003983713,0.00048546496,0.0008050309,0.00050623226,0.00560337,0.0024540373,0.00078908616,0.00017435948,0.00047226803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035819733,0.00040811943,0.0004180198,0.0015114548,0.0008223012,0.00502845,0.00020578751,0.0032698328,0.0012950923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011085032,0.00031175138,0.0056709712,0.000056413977,0.002500875,0.00019546301,0.019419929,0.00021901588,0.00010420669,0.36517546,0.6007977,0.0054373466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009624407,0.00022572934,0.0005517091,0.0001346777,0.00017400306,0.00062152196,0.07091284,0.000022369773,0.000017158492,0.05344782,0.87244004,0.00048971374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010196823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022322938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79142207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016113523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002763611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921677101","doi":"10.29173/mlj1082","title":"Public Inquiries’ Terms of Reference: Lessons from the Past – And for the Future","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1870536642896508,"score_gpt":0.40757396452527367,"score_spread":0.22052030023562286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921677101","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070352525,0.00026661018,0.0008791477,0.8808098,0.0029861603,0.00022047838,0.00003705437,0.000013775705,0.044434477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99021375,0.00014429215,0.00024996191,0.00228651,0.00698628,0.000007858313,0.0000029213832,0.000004063079,0.00010436252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993109,0.00014133785,0.00015079245,0.0000653393,0.00019761352,0.00013399053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986109,0.00063458533,0.00018858408,0.00012252394,0.000394971,0.00004842328],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009723511,0.000046972,0.000056871682,0.000016802662,0.002966746,0.0006379742,0.00030814274,0.00005095098,0.0003024355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003147805,0.000024582849,0.000025082863,0.00017943681,0.0010830229,0.00047308573,0.000026393094,0.00032628776,0.0000076110496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011037104,0.000023076396,0.0042492575,0.0000010565564,0.00003060448,1.2881645e-7,0.011209491,3.2009805e-8,0.000022058026,0.89676255,0.0413036,0.046387084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009321474,0.000020523505,0.011847369,0.0000045374327,0.000017958388,0.0000037685209,0.110724986,0.0000017802928,0.000009224462,0.029105183,0.84813863,0.000032842778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008483092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25880393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9198612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025001546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019127346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99833125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921759853","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500011562","title":"IALL 2012 Conference report: The 31 <sup>st</sup> Annual Course on International Law and Legal Information Toronto, Canada, 30 September - 4 October, 2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Course (navigation); Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.013918361883238008,"score_gpt":0.3186100650234458,"score_spread":0.30469170314020777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921759853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03581509,0.000107602405,0.0012413141,0.19620445,0.00804757,0.0006064051,0.0003270653,0.000047351175,0.75760317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788668,0.00009919243,0.00032233587,0.012853711,0.0013988563,0.00002653336,0.0002841492,0.000008136353,0.0061402726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965314,0.00013671043,0.0012397327,0.0000951686,0.0017397831,0.00025717582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932355,0.00028133148,0.0015156744,0.00016790778,0.004601991,0.00019754916],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013057243,0.00017995166,0.00017481964,0.00014893686,0.00043031274,0.0021200082,0.00067408127,0.00012639698,0.004219424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007592417,0.00014848975,0.000082035134,0.0001416211,0.00020448286,0.049559627,0.00007091774,0.0006010365,0.00020531475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007667584,0.00008752891,0.00020179924,0.0000055444452,0.00019156736,0.000012729525,0.00828437,0.0006317411,0.000003993076,0.4011449,0.57541364,0.013945518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049778423,0.000045236786,0.0035796198,0.000039646293,0.00002451229,0.00029215083,0.011245281,0.0009822039,0.0000109988705,0.00045370197,0.9826634,0.0001654721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39599153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18063489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9430517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008089282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029821945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921801185","doi":"","title":"The Student as Inadvertent Employee in Work-Integrated Learning: A Risk Assessment by University Lawyers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Tshwane University of Technology; University of Waterloo; University of Surrey; Curtin University of Technology; Griffith University; University of Cincinnati; Deakin University; University of South Africa; University of Wollongong; Michigan State University; Flinders University; University of New England; Massey University; Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand; Southern Cross University; Queensland University of Technology; University of Waikato; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Work (physics); Unintended consequences; Scholarship; Public relations; Payment; Vocational education; EXPOSE; Business; Legal advice; Sociology; Political science; Law; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.11732486260597759,"score_gpt":0.47363719681928323,"score_spread":0.35631233421330566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921801185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93838114,0.000029212877,0.000069504655,0.04062589,0.00047454602,0.0008615066,0.00013793429,0.00014063955,0.019279618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8655534,0.0013686678,0.0003984778,0.0000896949,0.00026227962,0.000002365213,0.00014461295,0.000020931377,0.1321596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194646,0.0041698893,0.00033409687,0.00064648007,0.0017009439,0.0012021436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99542737,0.0014287144,0.00026751103,0.00047375105,0.0019089316,0.00049369794],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004499966,0.0002667356,0.00028340388,0.0006410713,0.004230467,0.00048292577,0.001400925,0.0003098032,0.0006933728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012767981,0.00024134175,0.000111046356,0.004801672,0.001852732,0.00087915576,0.00033836658,0.003439331,0.00029032465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078553864,0.0012658427,0.71882993,0.000011191068,0.0002263722,0.00016761696,0.012889948,0.00007560497,0.00003250737,0.030621182,0.23026225,0.0048320326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096426805,0.000284152,0.24587625,0.00004215614,0.000029116507,0.0000014121556,0.0787488,0.00001535189,0.0000050395697,0.00010840072,0.6737,0.00022504773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13606362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19020775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47295365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018278747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024895638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99885976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921948824","doi":"","title":"LAWYERS MEET THE SOCIAL CONTEXT: UNDERSTANDING CULTURAL COMPETENCE","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural competence; Competence (human resources); Social justice; Psychology; Cultural diversity; Cultural values; Social psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Social science; Law; Criminology","score_opus":0.1612604705285253,"score_gpt":0.4026962245734172,"score_spread":0.2414357540448919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921948824","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015117241,0.005736373,0.000006096506,0.676468,0.00023956897,0.0002800129,0.000007793115,0.000015003552,0.31709597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96094245,0.0013018141,0.000011192479,0.03458842,0.00038039932,0.000018190081,0.0000069831003,0.000004808315,0.0027457634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896765,0.00037031708,0.00015118245,0.000080111866,0.00019689629,0.00023385185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994253,0.00017385464,0.000092475275,0.000118756456,0.00011061064,0.00007898864],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011949373,0.00006134222,0.0000919537,0.000018972241,0.003605379,0.00026554812,0.0003329848,0.000031306456,0.0008907444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031297613,0.000035863857,0.000051823074,0.00049797416,0.00043588862,0.0002335099,0.000007183041,0.00019472129,0.00016131265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.5155723e-7,0.0000013683191,0.00002746658,0.0000090667745,0.000003399032,3.367203e-7,0.0025563587,1.799807e-7,2.6740204e-7,0.7549394,0.24195844,0.0005035851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025632771,0.0000013257842,0.000253068,0.0000757853,0.00002517032,0.0000016224473,0.009337944,0.0000012625553,2.0361124e-7,0.0065437187,0.98367405,0.00006022763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6794778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96208197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96079123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069309614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016829212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922143494","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5788","title":"Advocacy in Non-Adversarial Family Law: A Recommendation for Revision to the Model Code","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Negotiation; Family law; Code (set theory); Law; Political science; Dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12062335744431228,"score_gpt":0.45620860557214055,"score_spread":0.33558524812782825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922143494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10274617,0.00001792662,0.11409371,0.3450617,0.0039550676,0.0046154144,0.000099414276,0.00008257975,0.42932802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745839,0.0000105494555,0.008553467,0.014156078,0.0012350389,0.00008286036,0.00001143149,0.000013461651,0.001353191],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989942,0.00009211646,0.0002886216,0.00019856327,0.0002221089,0.00020439163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869937,0.00040167134,0.00013519448,0.00019999733,0.00048191327,0.00008183919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013505371,0.0000749315,0.00011312444,0.0001327466,0.00038332015,0.00020175084,0.00048286596,0.00006634516,0.00014354057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018338374,0.00006612142,0.00003052842,0.00066263386,0.00007994744,0.00089095207,0.00008031377,0.00013532345,0.00009851994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012964485,0.0005323055,0.00033558576,0.00015490295,0.00004271093,4.4091746e-7,0.17544544,0.0047727968,0.00211137,0.17213455,0.58185667,0.061316773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040620143,0.00009811006,0.001147813,0.000067321314,0.000057908856,7.9170434e-8,0.005914639,0.0040953187,0.00024091227,0.000951253,0.9868812,0.00013923124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005543662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005068721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87183774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009616829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054964545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8380395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922836245","doi":"","title":"Perceptions and Conceptions of Feedback: Differences between Levels of Study in a School of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Law; Psychology; Mathematics education; Political science","score_opus":0.1811049844193835,"score_gpt":0.41525042425208486,"score_spread":0.23414543983270136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922836245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8298544,0.0001253008,0.0001150968,0.0012707831,0.000022053675,0.0005888562,0.00012610557,0.000005468301,0.16789189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9227913,0.00007763706,0.0003037651,0.0000063350485,0.000016250817,1.326372e-7,0.0000049665464,0.000004088356,0.076795496],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972448,0.0013464157,0.00025117001,0.00021460821,0.00070695713,0.00023605644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968297,0.0009673668,0.00035460986,0.00033902258,0.0013768616,0.0001324659],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023926022,0.00008751749,0.00036655442,0.00028359026,0.0010520817,0.000016118323,0.0008351718,0.00009740963,0.1959269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003696181,0.00009627226,0.00007652199,0.0013735355,0.004562135,0.000736759,0.00038418194,0.00029604186,0.0012868474],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010665458,0.0023870831,0.02695697,0.00028905764,0.00072342384,0.000012008172,0.6456398,0.000012095716,0.024695022,0.028223105,0.26522478,0.004770155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089881953,0.00046692503,0.6046739,0.000074386364,0.00007932469,2.728672e-7,0.33439833,0.000009082679,0.0005476741,0.00006645615,0.058691278,0.000093561575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04203559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045331825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57771695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013426588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010264136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927339976","doi":"","title":"Online struggles for professional jurisdiction and cultural authority: an analysis of professional association websites in Ontario","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Horizontes (Ponce)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Professional association; Association (psychology); Public relations; Political science; Law; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.05898316169005656,"score_gpt":0.3943387375544788,"score_spread":0.3353555758644222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927339976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99125135,0.000043254284,0.00005323018,0.006559172,0.00071117055,0.00032188397,0.0000778964,0.000031046016,0.0009510172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98449105,0.000038254155,0.0019926669,0.000092964714,0.00021288694,0.000044600103,0.00047692412,0.000005467855,0.01264519],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852705,0.0002623919,0.00036844632,0.00022091121,0.00041689255,0.00020430976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840474,0.00052740774,0.00034753248,0.000089191664,0.0005529487,0.00007815962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008643128,0.00009613869,0.00022876723,0.0002802385,0.00060808193,0.00004730901,0.00010380693,0.00016288877,0.00028527746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009583226,0.0000866831,0.00006961512,0.00091242674,0.00010687764,0.0011843331,0.000018598486,0.00032335694,0.0000018232695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081114296,0.0008665287,0.9119774,0.0000085539705,0.00013282643,5.327621e-7,0.06403734,0.000020022753,0.0005170265,0.018670535,0.0025476322,0.0011404634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003390325,0.000093094866,0.931112,0.000022847453,0.00013563316,4.63412e-7,0.02051739,0.0006562233,0.000050081147,0.00061808754,0.046326045,0.00012911591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07801145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6200554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5420439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052602525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013127811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9281281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2929520862","doi":"10.11575/prism/32759","title":"Summary Legal Advice Services in Alberta: Survey Results from the First Two Years of Data Collection","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Data collection; Computer science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.03926256618920762,"score_gpt":0.3019631827016875,"score_spread":0.2627006165124799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2929520862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78381443,0.000055380086,0.0007100192,0.049308926,0.0006462222,0.0003315631,0.000041162068,0.000032351272,0.16505997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988165,0.00011006472,0.0037899567,0.00035676992,0.000072422496,1.7709233e-7,0.00033296464,0.000004653415,0.007167982],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999133,0.000271771,0.00012808555,0.00016592974,0.00020533799,0.000095884534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809074,0.0011740922,0.00020165803,0.00032719417,0.00017628355,0.000030033336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010968188,0.000040539115,0.00008806262,0.000068290086,0.0003383535,0.000026513158,0.0006374651,0.00005690782,0.00014116419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004639555,0.00004611876,0.000016359063,0.0007785994,0.00026686132,0.0011217344,0.00013917929,0.00014628787,0.000024215067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017903274,0.0007157852,0.2255835,0.000023615929,0.00018848188,0.000008464868,0.37832,0.000001653792,0.000055787008,0.012572765,0.28579172,0.09494788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043581513,0.00001409693,0.42994848,0.000017236229,0.000014153964,7.8486856e-8,0.002378543,0.0016463618,0.000004020163,0.00011429129,0.5653772,0.0000497231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9501668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8623261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3759415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004456129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044435117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2602376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2929850989","doi":"10.3138/tric.39.1.90","title":"Liberal Education, Entrepreneurship, and the Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theatre Research in Canada","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal arts education; Liberal education; Institution; Entrepreneurship; Political science; Higher education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.08127109074639963,"score_gpt":0.44072164726257546,"score_spread":0.35945055651617586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2929850989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034252327,0.00012089562,1.82186e-7,0.26637265,0.00032614561,0.00016831719,0.0000014369132,0.0000047144076,0.69875336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516094,0.00007651147,0.000024855866,0.0025349932,0.0005069429,0.000035500976,0.0000013796563,0.000003536193,0.0016553721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811876,0.00094845897,0.00010282964,0.00011241935,0.00045377607,0.00026376802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825,0.0012285576,0.000020835672,0.00017252262,0.0002278672,0.00010021779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025292507,0.000034512443,0.000049483646,0.000057121684,0.00075721456,0.00016286579,0.00021076135,0.000020406847,0.0005171424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016509282,0.00002519653,0.0000063212074,0.00071504223,0.0009961812,0.00021339621,0.000032423657,0.00033363944,0.00002020134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029689527,0.000025494059,0.008053605,0.0000032895655,0.000004202453,7.8462494e-7,0.010172722,1.8662053e-7,0.0000022959998,0.858636,0.072458446,0.050613232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013640002,0.000005340096,0.00088483887,0.000009095054,0.0000011161237,0.000001033484,0.021343742,0.0000041246053,0.000017512042,0.04040256,0.93715936,0.00003486633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99818176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9609086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004359368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0192173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98634285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935554223","doi":"10.11575/prism/36334","title":"Academic Integrity in Canada: An Annotated Bibliography","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Bibliography; Annotated bibliography; Library science; History; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02726953907363016,"score_gpt":0.28520820707052136,"score_spread":0.2579386679968912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935554223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91915125,0.00002898859,0.0004655495,0.013083871,0.00022067627,0.00013821498,5.7457765e-7,0.00001851204,0.06689238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966934,0.00025041692,0.0016132328,0.00029253593,0.000008023203,1.3016879e-7,0.000008886919,0.0000024905316,0.0011308889],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992778,0.00015369446,0.00008446985,0.000118110314,0.00022502635,0.00014095151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995088,0.00009202322,0.00009407482,0.000107776286,0.00011229197,0.00008506189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039604362,0.000042349388,0.00008912578,0.0010529042,0.00012709845,0.000010930819,0.0002652975,0.00008295766,0.0009111465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057981906,0.00005507697,0.000022435386,0.0039653205,0.0000849249,0.0009161091,0.000022522789,0.0006022531,0.00002267477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051086725,0.00010891375,0.8607373,0.000013450849,0.000021234891,0.000008265139,0.02655918,0.000001179526,0.00021977538,0.041331805,0.031808432,0.039139368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029114055,0.000017749608,0.6654419,0.0000127640515,0.000008142258,2.405614e-7,0.012918725,0.00086925185,0.000012371998,0.0010022514,0.3193059,0.00011956639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91215575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28749746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015248344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002958213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935613447","doi":"","title":"'Silly, Soft and Otherwise Suspect’: Doctoral education as risky business","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Research Online (Deakin University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Rigour; False accusation; Relation (database); Corporate governance; Political science; Misconduct; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Criminology; Management; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.0991315259408548,"score_gpt":0.4445885805701416,"score_spread":0.34545705462928683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935613447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7324304,0.00008719384,0.00013238785,0.12373944,0.00034355538,0.00047207074,0.000027719881,0.00013170358,0.14263551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559674,0.00019954136,0.0019778037,0.00057367026,0.0010961196,0.0000031880859,0.00005254738,0.000018626415,0.040111046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997487,0.00070705015,0.0001807721,0.00038031887,0.0007356519,0.0005091962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970653,0.00057377986,0.000115046234,0.00028856884,0.0016599081,0.00029739182],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013317264,0.00013121779,0.00013931908,0.0010044061,0.0013856796,0.00033799218,0.0005025069,0.00016078509,0.0016095471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002105056,0.00014830382,0.00003901369,0.0037206358,0.00065056374,0.0014791549,0.00014097472,0.0007478251,0.0002664719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009116543,0.00086384855,0.004346496,0.000017293109,0.000027094113,0.000020439878,0.0036385492,0.000015841084,0.00009356189,0.9282935,0.01628218,0.04630999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000303417,0.000030048293,0.011303492,0.000025771038,0.0000128709335,0.0000058192973,0.007937357,0.000047297286,0.000021012516,0.0014327704,0.9787083,0.00017182225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06674404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036053132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9624261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005649853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004892993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293761694","doi":"","title":"Legal Argumentation and Evidence by Douglas Walton (review)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.021659329074499925,"score_gpt":0.31056474879870066,"score_spread":0.28890541972420075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293761694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119408354,0.07084258,0.0022803065,0.064848445,0.0018155343,0.0012023392,0.00002346867,0.00013614674,0.7394428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706035,0.01109035,0.0012190017,0.00060513226,0.000038949645,4.6572066e-7,0.00000646735,0.0000034405698,0.016432654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938303,0.00019301627,0.00007902448,0.00010272293,0.00015491249,0.000087314584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952686,0.000104763516,0.00010710718,0.00008071699,0.00012210142,0.000058444086],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038618912,0.000042470394,0.00007095951,0.000011245284,0.0002707009,0.000026663001,0.00008848627,0.00003162569,0.0018484967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010823598,0.0000521082,0.00002082258,0.00006342873,0.00010346749,0.0018065348,0.000002822458,0.000054769185,0.000017805165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004719021,0.00026874943,0.0016545489,0.00022631742,0.000053807908,0.0000037114296,0.14875473,2.6245894e-7,0.0008725624,0.34223598,0.44411692,0.061765213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012844207,0.00009548895,0.0006939216,0.00008815967,0.000026325075,7.0213525e-7,0.03172566,0.0000015054147,0.000012991749,0.000086356085,0.96707314,0.000067276844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12827198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033644028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85119516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013820478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021156853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941074681","doi":"","title":"TO BE OR NOT TO BE?: SOME LEGAL ETHICS FOR JUDICIAL LAW CLERKS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislation; Facilitator; Legal ethics; Principal (computer security); Practice of law; Political science; Judicial opinion; Legal profession; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.4333036997660276,"score_gpt":0.4785080265117015,"score_spread":0.04520432674567387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941074681","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012891543,0.0005504374,0.000016707,0.88233554,0.0006715117,0.0011359025,0.00006292239,0.000019427567,0.115078606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07766518,0.0013380272,0.00068687706,0.91060203,0.00068501517,0.00018527679,0.000010354426,0.000017010247,0.008810254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987886,0.00026087917,0.0002248259,0.0001512999,0.00023373375,0.00034066307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984964,0.00033069187,0.00006670703,0.0002685715,0.0003108297,0.0005268157],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002866068,0.00008333509,0.0001554455,0.000056369954,0.0014233134,0.00014012276,0.00044643114,0.00009152927,0.0030639134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042758463,0.00006265841,0.000056081048,0.00056073134,0.000104830964,0.00032252155,0.000016968455,0.00037696815,0.00041950287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005655074,0.0000056360695,8.8899117e-7,0.00003663764,0.0000060090506,7.044677e-7,0.014712022,8.297244e-8,6.064344e-7,0.80212444,0.18075152,0.0023558056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003290524,0.000029957791,0.0000495486,0.00012170935,0.00003789449,9.3482197e-7,0.0008497991,2.1907418e-7,0.0000056623344,0.0014468896,0.9973178,0.00010671829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7537497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8165662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002621334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057992046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941788659","doi":"","title":"Library: LAW Adjusting to Law School: School Life Balance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Balance (ability); Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03373473366637473,"score_gpt":0.34584544764065317,"score_spread":0.3121107139742784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941788659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003182583,0.0000117858035,0.0003859543,0.19581947,0.0005040806,0.00012561113,0.0000014810415,0.00024650458,0.79972255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8258832,0.000005801614,0.0073213554,0.1230341,0.0012168288,0.000019872386,0.0000047105136,0.000011124215,0.042503018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989407,0.000178831,0.00018961639,0.0001842303,0.00025052179,0.00025611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987695,0.00031625127,0.00006904319,0.00020581402,0.00011461007,0.000524781],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062643073,0.00007267208,0.00008816298,0.00004527472,0.0007849447,0.0007631066,0.0002745139,0.00006569754,0.010411976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004070109,0.00007005707,0.000025554227,0.0006888348,0.00008979454,0.0025199119,0.00004577804,0.0002695098,0.003975308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025558113,0.00001894902,0.002001757,0.00000223049,0.0000029974572,8.914417e-8,0.00075113145,0.0000047227095,0.000033142936,0.8276991,0.16914938,0.00033391145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007693961,0.000011873297,0.0011618038,0.000009985908,0.000003976579,1.6581798e-7,0.0021507062,0.00002868235,0.00006882379,0.0045541152,0.9918199,0.0001129931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016582364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033245655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82314503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033326833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064055604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942740453","doi":"10.64628/aam.r9k7kfugn","title":"Why the Kavanaugh hearings were a show trial gone bad","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.10164630551253181,"score_gpt":0.41884051029091324,"score_spread":0.31719420477838145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942740453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051420373,0.000038130795,0.00025954106,0.4383253,0.005659416,0.0007229103,0.0000069340454,0.00011720953,0.5497285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.558933,0.00033437865,0.0035244853,0.076982245,0.019670153,0.0005277228,0.00009582154,0.000058874313,0.33987328],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816966,0.0004040113,0.00031772224,0.00032843358,0.0005073486,0.0002728124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819213,0.0004954498,0.00026327325,0.0005317037,0.0004224694,0.00009499154],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021543314,0.0001469279,0.0001763996,0.00008006263,0.0010441324,0.0010570649,0.0006967816,0.00031045874,0.012151956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021280593,0.000104667146,0.00012196867,0.00038061253,0.00041263187,0.00035379495,0.00027621764,0.0011032036,0.00055550196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021746467,0.00009068162,0.0000351734,0.000005055805,0.000036712856,2.7362302e-7,0.013335404,0.0000011951178,0.0000016509961,0.1242072,0.86072326,0.0013459125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009075953,0.00002428189,0.000098696015,0.000013666766,0.000029688801,3.5590818e-7,0.004177061,0.0000091290685,0.0000063846555,0.013950661,0.9806318,0.00015064985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06966128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022757158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.553791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014335892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023058027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944527804","doi":"","title":"BOOK REVIEW - COMPTE RENDU - A REVIEW ESSAY: PROBING THE BLACK BOX - AMERICAN SOCIAL SCIENCE TACKLES JUDICIAL AGENDA SETTING BY THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05781270026438395,"score_gpt":0.38242304214531847,"score_spread":0.3246103418809345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944527804","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.576441e-9,0.62826884,5.7215783e-7,0.34588122,0.00027355403,0.0035007102,0.00020089495,0.000014858564,0.021859312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000002312855,0.81481475,0.000010826857,0.18221004,0.0003675906,0.00031521075,0.000093536626,0.00004299574,0.0021427574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916743,0.0032226136,0.0017594156,0.000585911,0.0016540856,0.0011036517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99383813,0.0008742775,0.0028835945,0.0011600194,0.0008292268,0.00041476835],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013651908,0.0005526646,0.0021807954,0.00009812405,0.0056485017,0.0003107508,0.0035185376,0.00010255221,0.0019870254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051314784,0.000307968,0.0005203836,0.0053855865,0.004061348,0.00040973802,0.00013874673,0.0017156518,0.000086643086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.4711227e-7,0.0000060714497,8.2395005e-8,0.042603217,0.000047137913,0.0000017966001,0.0005379589,3.024493e-8,1.1969312e-8,0.006052466,0.7387556,0.21199548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020588799,0.0000061590317,9.2059076e-7,0.19406098,0.00128591,0.000014401865,0.00015783565,1.0209539e-7,3.259462e-8,0.000023520895,0.80413365,0.000295872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9100106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90571684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21169962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041287765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1273708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944577908","doi":"","title":"Fitness for Purpose: Mandatory Continuing Legal Ethics Education for Lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Legal profession; Law; Political science; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.06429586042986292,"score_gpt":0.4570667056379256,"score_spread":0.3927708452080627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944577908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011376427,0.0014511918,0.018332902,0.22341141,0.010301558,0.0038572652,0.00007064943,0.0004696593,0.7307289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90805084,0.000062584295,0.006613879,0.0048520905,0.0032451656,0.0005440774,0.00014383908,0.00003166161,0.076455854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848616,0.00019932607,0.00035213146,0.0003276798,0.00022631428,0.00040840235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966973,0.001177493,0.00020654357,0.00024552539,0.0015044843,0.00016865501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002245498,0.00015557645,0.00018887823,0.00014458915,0.001293875,0.00045518283,0.0003298467,0.00028040537,0.0001698507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043385318,0.00017196458,0.00012084191,0.0005561712,0.00017800338,0.0011715728,0.000013703861,0.00047096025,0.000098903525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003398978,0.0002970793,0.000038533453,0.000038450376,0.00001158568,7.688674e-8,0.02474498,0.0000016784843,0.00015350465,0.80373424,0.09515595,0.0757899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042503682,0.00006674962,0.00030015392,0.00004828846,0.00004127439,9.987621e-7,0.006335119,0.00004239233,0.00028689692,0.011865896,0.98035663,0.00023058924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030624704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001884309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89667445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020563333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033427835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945286097","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.6","title":"Challenges in Gendering Indigenous Legal Education: Insights from Professors Teaching about Indigenous Laws","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal education; Indigenous education; Political science; Sociology; Power (physics); Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.043032596854771434,"score_gpt":0.32752876234213324,"score_spread":0.2844961654873618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945286097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87796247,0.004217212,0.0000044420894,0.011576678,0.0019982886,0.00030863233,0.000015897578,0.000009735391,0.10390666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99217165,0.000930784,0.0003604024,0.0038283186,0.00070169306,0.000011520725,0.000015934073,0.000024601684,0.0019551266],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824965,0.00029367054,0.00048467473,0.00025177764,0.00014941228,0.0005708099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979928,0.00028005493,0.00039839535,0.000196589,0.0003069595,0.00082521106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001315539,0.0001627758,0.000329878,0.00016293724,0.001137497,0.00031973884,0.0003460282,0.000258041,0.00012752782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023552969,0.00018944446,0.00013183751,0.0002470064,0.00018939175,0.0012850607,0.000013541185,0.0012837485,0.0000074586496],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002192013,0.00003113648,0.0014867226,0.000028898834,0.000051115996,0.00001625175,0.54408926,0.000008248784,0.0000116685305,0.44668645,0.00014861106,0.007439488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037202903,0.000053987118,0.01034355,0.0002024733,0.000031831398,0.000044799395,0.39544812,0.000005116956,0.0000035800406,0.011045858,0.58215356,0.0002950964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5882634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95282876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58200496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015723425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011959291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945613255","doi":"10.3968/10960","title":"The Legal Professional Qualification Examination and Legal Education in China","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; China; Legal education; Political science; Professional development; Law; Pedagogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.022367735485083452,"score_gpt":0.4141184820290598,"score_spread":0.39175074654397635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945613255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5787916,0.000090201625,0.000003133503,0.023913382,0.0036593399,0.0003998639,0.0000011024306,0.000017114675,0.39312422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89517546,0.00002900177,0.00012445466,0.00034333527,0.00031567132,0.000060366467,0.00000869009,0.000004864035,0.10393815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982529,0.00030883116,0.00031617933,0.00024774467,0.00065301935,0.00022127344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867934,0.00019951278,0.00032487744,0.00015019994,0.00057549065,0.000070607224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028947506,0.00007738642,0.00008622994,0.00022832768,0.0012605868,0.00033563096,0.0003292955,0.00007519369,0.00030857115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041093712,0.00006796863,0.000020302106,0.0017327593,0.0007671441,0.0021470094,0.000031322805,0.00022516874,0.00003341415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005400178,0.00022917282,0.006043757,0.0000076902315,0.000001113123,9.159432e-9,0.009762522,2.7071047e-7,0.000992272,0.9549684,0.0014405717,0.02654881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005488126,0.0000074461336,0.59767234,0.000012005979,0.0000022599081,2.9282447e-7,0.011040127,0.0000031323916,0.000061154875,0.0018473368,0.38923845,0.000060592272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003974796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016145843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95312107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032103623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009884148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946089218","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.14","title":"Conceptualizing the Victim within Criminal Justice Processes in Common Law Tradition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Criminal justice; Theory of criminal justice; Criminology; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminal law; Law enforcement; Criminal justice ethics; Foundation (evidence); Law; Enforcement; Public interest; Sociology","score_opus":0.13898286173150043,"score_gpt":0.40916019662009884,"score_spread":0.2701773348885984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946089218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013773357,0.00058028294,0.00003759708,0.015914371,0.0031792277,0.0004852455,0.00003217611,0.00006917552,0.9783246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8398896,0.006300886,0.00027930067,0.011923876,0.0023468817,0.00015152509,0.00060776673,0.000037731184,0.13846245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980551,0.0004836277,0.00042972015,0.00026582184,0.00051516306,0.00025057877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974519,0.0015200393,0.00038637148,0.00021983891,0.00036417117,0.000057675243],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010045525,0.00017116927,0.00023487546,0.000102624464,0.0007683293,0.0004983986,0.000434994,0.0003067168,0.001283261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007770663,0.0001267866,0.000037784594,0.0008753572,0.0003649679,0.00092314096,0.000023531224,0.0012268915,0.00025721084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009723374,0.00009888848,0.000027537983,0.00041290023,0.000013695022,0.0000011387511,0.16311628,0.000010150375,1.6218202e-7,0.7357984,0.09952156,0.0009895451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097076554,0.000017916986,0.000024781417,0.00021828756,0.00011558037,0.0000019512665,0.2600725,0.000010675055,0.000003943535,0.0027999138,0.73646706,0.00017035054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024669582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06198313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83986217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023005305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004343162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946153400","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v26i1.825","title":"Supervision in the Clinic Setting: what we Really Want Students to Learn","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Compliance (psychology); Law; Economic Justice; Set (abstract data type); Legal education; Legal service; Legal profession; Service (business); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08194282851720693,"score_gpt":0.5537119594487657,"score_spread":0.4717691309315588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946153400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5781346,0.00009299028,0.00003014418,0.39175802,0.014718876,0.00025553937,0.0000010919979,0.0000063074394,0.015002414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97242767,0.0013411009,0.0008623953,0.016346412,0.0028866013,0.000008667768,0.000008665382,0.000009536,0.006108932],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953183,0.0010688534,0.0015550265,0.00019900069,0.0016756192,0.00018322509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948691,0.0022564207,0.000847751,0.00021117268,0.0016580068,0.00015751689],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010532303,0.00009846838,0.00022315711,0.00032271296,0.00011508042,0.0012158888,0.0014689115,0.00012617548,0.0011517458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008035235,0.00007460977,0.00017818547,0.0005145167,0.00006875668,0.0029312854,0.000060903916,0.0010428021,0.0006726261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000713354,0.0051231766,0.2985633,0.000012574531,0.0001589629,0.000017732435,0.074961744,0.0000706922,0.000060000282,0.05859144,0.10557863,0.4561484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044258306,0.00016151667,0.11943421,0.0002035448,0.000013145589,0.000012508071,0.042538397,0.0000052206506,0.000003206992,0.0019971235,0.8351019,0.000086647204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093582517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005016686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72952324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018473358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040708673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946164901","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v49i2.46292","title":"Trinity Western University’s Law School: Quo Vadis?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0639360732605877,"score_gpt":0.40598376862321744,"score_spread":0.34204769536262974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946164901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13153262,0.000087422915,0.00014049748,0.29401577,0.0044486453,0.000099222096,0.0000073424235,0.00001313162,0.56965536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92093194,0.00006560131,0.0040877536,0.0027475944,0.006803571,5.4424476e-7,0.0000037688678,0.000007168528,0.06535207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988596,0.000252927,0.0002690665,0.00008627377,0.00038175125,0.00015040167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972718,0.00057864183,0.00042348067,0.000112014655,0.0013858577,0.00022824688],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009978054,0.0000637362,0.00010330366,0.00016649965,0.0007088117,0.00015652883,0.0003247848,0.00006368409,0.0046143704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014838018,0.00006318094,0.00007126754,0.0006666057,0.00032724105,0.0015495742,0.000016455819,0.00033369227,0.0004381367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035052948,0.00023681481,0.008623646,0.0000021791363,0.000030640997,9.262863e-7,0.0040795417,8.416519e-7,0.000029020888,0.9111119,0.075602755,0.0002466677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018088664,0.000044819135,0.018723443,0.00001657402,0.00002286557,0.000013622596,0.004789186,2.8147664e-7,0.000036457073,0.009154801,0.9669439,0.00007315814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000975045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002381596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9019571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026346868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040939446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946874170","doi":"10.7202/1058600ar","title":"L’enseignement du droit d’auteur dans les États de tradition juridique de common law","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02406521490584773,"score_gpt":0.2870249646225513,"score_spread":0.26295974971670355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946874170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60033476,0.0002559525,0.0016189836,0.089102864,0.0013232658,0.00044326537,0.000076467906,0.00009317966,0.30675128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96272355,0.00050220825,0.0021769262,0.0038885646,0.0012225822,0.000075772085,0.00010662437,0.000041508138,0.029262267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757546,0.0005767831,0.0004823112,0.00037015366,0.00029482902,0.0007004849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984843,0.00036826945,0.00031967656,0.00037973397,0.00015411506,0.00029389368],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014640345,0.00018240084,0.00028226007,0.000097093216,0.00076024985,0.00028959947,0.00039927618,0.00035258796,0.0019305607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016226292,0.00027809085,0.00017040607,0.0006907698,0.00033098453,0.0009337728,0.00003261124,0.00076915906,0.0008150942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017939841,0.00046513925,0.0068993475,0.00016779985,0.000049172984,0.000031097166,0.04244638,0.00024830268,0.001069662,0.9324686,0.010519267,0.005617317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005145738,0.00017090894,0.018362625,0.0003022059,0.0001592868,0.00019635187,0.01427555,0.0016139268,0.00089050573,0.24506667,0.7179013,0.000546098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02438726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010831528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.707382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024494259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019477801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947617514","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11571","title":"Developing a Competency Model for Parole Board Members","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Cronbach's alpha; Psychology; Competency assessment; Medical education; Knowledge management; Medicine; Computer science; Psychometrics; Social psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.0809046734998401,"score_gpt":0.4292508049772788,"score_spread":0.3483461314774387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947617514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014972559,0.000036527654,0.016824393,0.04622382,0.0020185334,0.00057493383,0.000019564655,0.00012529774,0.93267965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0776113,0.00014959753,0.04252686,0.0022504735,0.00054770475,0.00039662587,0.00044133572,0.000033567816,0.87604254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900645,0.00004391247,0.00025536295,0.0002055159,0.0002540539,0.00023467495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871653,0.00029657257,0.00021543946,0.0001162254,0.0005891613,0.00006608433],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004320537,0.00011504138,0.00013902546,0.000113333415,0.00074009853,0.00016305826,0.0002062642,0.00021068372,0.0009285125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007459979,0.00009833567,0.00007288484,0.00021936577,0.000033936743,0.0004782274,0.000004746799,0.00015162036,0.000088037756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015230894,0.000016442244,0.00002168625,0.000026877164,0.000020725594,5.039694e-8,0.017784566,0.0000032666655,0.00002281082,0.9444276,0.032883596,0.0047771437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016763086,0.000006351222,0.00006637167,0.00006198592,0.000034398163,6.237962e-8,0.019021362,0.0006010022,0.00007812001,0.06535515,0.9143083,0.0002992375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002670422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031818066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8814247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018073442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059786723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947753103","doi":"","title":"Settlement Conferences and Judicial Role: The Scaffolding for Expanded Thinking about Judicial Ethics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Mediation; Political science; Judicial opinion; Settlement (finance); Engineering ethics; Action (physics); Task (project management); Sociology; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.058166659278520924,"score_gpt":0.40075243274369904,"score_spread":0.3425857734651781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947753103","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3707636,0.013149982,0.015083204,0.53938943,0.0064696767,0.0013797708,0.000020411913,0.00013195348,0.053611953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916875,0.0027990108,0.00020285412,0.001715506,0.0031832138,0.000020665155,0.00000395899,0.000008730816,0.00037856447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744713,0.0003535546,0.0002451232,0.00010127176,0.00045525,0.0013976672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985387,0.0007905041,0.0002530059,0.00006814389,0.00025798925,0.000091688715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012401887,0.00009113747,0.000103528124,0.00006910957,0.0037443987,0.0004380794,0.00024357828,0.00011476108,0.000089487316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014032165,0.000068486486,0.000049418642,0.00022459248,0.00018749606,0.000766517,0.00002464977,0.0021687613,0.0000056398208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015500498,0.000029036775,0.0025995548,0.0000015576059,0.000048185437,2.8267669e-8,0.041693762,7.1678465e-7,0.00004592534,0.9399169,0.00042706454,0.015221754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030627687,0.00006436929,0.001503022,0.000018266102,0.00006828022,0.000019107249,0.14232747,0.000010796766,0.000042566568,0.57867485,0.27683142,0.00013359557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016781337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010457782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6209239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037670715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009136547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947885322","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5786","title":"Informal Justice: An Examination of Why Ontarians Do Not Seek Legal Advice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legal psychology; Adjudication; Political science; Legal culture; Legal profession; Premise; Legal research; Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Scholarship; Law; Legal advice; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.059316527181500094,"score_gpt":0.3957055367769666,"score_spread":0.3363890095954665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947885322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39437824,0.00001085106,0.0015799663,0.008738992,0.0018074064,0.0005326777,0.000034238103,0.00012659765,0.592791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99024934,0.00000765939,0.0026179936,0.003393746,0.0011724966,0.000016399777,0.000012070015,0.000014745963,0.0025155742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820983,0.00017988707,0.00047367567,0.00021981771,0.0006364641,0.0002803504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974321,0.00032674082,0.00038721893,0.000319899,0.0013594149,0.00017463803],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012958561,0.00012122431,0.0001793097,0.00030164243,0.00040675627,0.00032382205,0.0006854162,0.00012908856,0.0011366543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017700391,0.00013174144,0.000038217273,0.000992791,0.00029592947,0.004531509,0.00008799895,0.0002444243,0.000111928835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000747291,0.0014012986,0.0023550417,0.0007374427,0.00014503005,0.000006308059,0.3209097,0.00033386392,0.004522932,0.5503359,0.060722593,0.057782613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006646243,0.00054630707,0.14255483,0.00011317197,0.0006742334,0.0000030696306,0.0408857,0.00035511656,0.0033125405,0.00015843302,0.81028396,0.00044800367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015215378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0089050075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74956137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007524412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001028353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948412693","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5784","title":"L’accès à la justice en contexte numérique : l’information juridique par et pour les justiciables sur les médias sociaux","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10363388441470366,"score_gpt":0.4088481063230622,"score_spread":0.3052142219083585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948412693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09819758,0.0010745206,0.016333297,0.30745912,0.0059966873,0.001396155,0.00032221904,0.0002328453,0.5689876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964793,0.0011483179,0.004422721,0.009262656,0.004001851,0.00009039163,0.00004362035,0.00006278414,0.016174637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957013,0.001405191,0.0010328471,0.00041451253,0.00075725984,0.0006888555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916257,0.0042255204,0.00092003803,0.00043484202,0.0024651645,0.0003287082],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032977536,0.00040046737,0.0004828333,0.00035821254,0.0011173361,0.0009827636,0.0011440932,0.0006244674,0.0033770928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010721498,0.00044849628,0.00014806628,0.0013922155,0.0009630675,0.00651586,0.00027823547,0.00096850266,0.0010779174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023474566,0.0006682335,0.001293405,0.0016078033,0.0002122557,0.0000064956785,0.09204519,0.000417417,0.000453225,0.65815717,0.21309884,0.031805243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005659031,0.00014629427,0.020896168,0.00055172713,0.000864333,0.000008400875,0.04995751,0.00037993147,0.0010829979,0.0015007431,0.92345136,0.0005946212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01680461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003718848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86659545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028543867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045529706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948617432","doi":"10.4324/9781351052467-6","title":"Launching Careers in Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05918613757334021,"score_gpt":0.36625117139186947,"score_spread":0.30706503381852923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948617432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007373269,0.00004108306,0.000009098964,0.021735877,0.0008662858,0.00015024631,0.0000033174501,0.0000358387,0.97715086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02077054,0.000040457282,0.00013671178,0.0036422538,0.00023029611,0.0000020082261,0.000015756725,0.000011437361,0.9751505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934024,0.000024397335,0.00015065224,0.00013524242,0.00023139948,0.000118056036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994653,0.00018470566,0.000085240594,0.00013388507,0.0000932841,0.000037589696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004326461,0.00007552456,0.000100525795,0.00009966381,0.00014017083,0.00014739012,0.00014017808,0.00019362531,0.008975293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108438566,0.00007719492,0.000034922858,0.00005283676,0.00011575057,0.00038926507,0.00001584975,0.0004960535,0.0013633925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.6766415e-7,0.0000037111586,0.00002715845,0.0000028712277,0.0000043301775,6.8763615e-7,0.004408206,8.1531954e-7,3.5272663e-7,0.9804198,0.014297579,0.000833829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036681828,0.00000291488,0.000008415419,0.000020853313,0.000004284379,1.2802079e-7,0.0013456704,5.5668767e-7,3.678021e-7,0.028311187,0.9701672,0.000101703066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029042521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08926296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016550183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010822061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949479188","doi":"","title":"PROTECTING THE PUBLIC INTEREST","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Public interest; Public law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Public policy; Economics","score_opus":0.16042853497149698,"score_gpt":0.39811916092067406,"score_spread":0.2376906259491771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949479188","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008279997,0.0046357075,8.1896184e-7,0.7898616,0.0003628316,0.00068177126,0.0000011099321,0.0000116723195,0.20361644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943953,0.0020582387,0.000010939565,0.043617826,0.00017774588,0.00005505419,0.0000018947164,0.000005202875,0.0101201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988891,0.0006426269,0.000109700675,0.00006806484,0.000106454565,0.0001840812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991951,0.00024365289,0.0000719517,0.0002590619,0.00012257553,0.000107665706],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003583617,0.000038873754,0.000058415735,0.000025093654,0.0014625989,0.0002667713,0.0003983011,0.00002170201,0.0055684224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003234833,0.000021475707,0.000029326398,0.0005460043,0.00008475868,0.000234843,0.000010850456,0.0004566148,0.0027858485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.0362964e-7,0.0000022328245,0.00018642165,0.00004594205,0.000006103739,2.0998814e-7,0.0023172488,2.1040133e-8,6.2577107e-7,0.90546477,0.0642851,0.02769125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010046403,0.00000197728,0.00015457223,0.00013123515,0.0000061635515,0.0000019118245,0.0011717485,7.3675307e-7,2.7743963e-7,0.00045860998,0.99802804,0.00003469248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23238702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8790552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.943125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018214322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025255485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949668285","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5789","title":"Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada: Towards Accessible Dispute Resolution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Intervention (counseling); Resolution (logic); Element (criminal law); Civil procedure; Determinative; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07811686466140803,"score_gpt":0.39798115150442565,"score_spread":0.3198642868430176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949668285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45130315,0.00013100736,0.0024524836,0.08093623,0.0054243966,0.0010974904,0.00006893819,0.000101170626,0.45848513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941409,0.00003272047,0.0009735878,0.0019780442,0.0015139435,0.00003199312,0.000010729329,0.000014903352,0.0013031468],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791884,0.00021315156,0.00046055924,0.00030269971,0.00067035545,0.00043438765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985768,0.00018621128,0.00025674285,0.0002763088,0.00052520726,0.00017868902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009130235,0.00012429441,0.000193133,0.0002834898,0.0004451608,0.0002159422,0.0006825421,0.0001006964,0.00061641535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018825292,0.00013611208,0.000031539854,0.0017236548,0.00019972555,0.0017088255,0.00014961555,0.00028954874,0.00006595606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014130896,0.0009983971,0.07858538,0.00040798838,0.00015462715,0.000035232668,0.059486076,0.0017299087,0.0017112147,0.22912897,0.55805653,0.068292566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047647953,0.00008422534,0.47552374,0.0001632857,0.00011593849,9.783594e-7,0.004657191,0.0007249515,0.00068609125,0.00092430785,0.5162572,0.000385607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95258534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9678256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5428378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008892631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074595893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950555679","doi":"","title":"Creating a Classroom of Integrity: Four Strategies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholar Works at UT Tyler (The University of Texas at Tyler)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.031764784723696954,"score_gpt":0.290320822590103,"score_spread":0.258556037866406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950555679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7390645,0.000084505446,0.000097368036,0.0076228227,0.00027197198,0.00024486176,0.0000064058695,0.0000372496,0.25257033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96143866,0.00012252678,0.0012426801,0.00015646555,0.00006318373,2.586344e-7,0.000008744443,0.000009067996,0.036958434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984114,0.0004195873,0.00021895223,0.00023119412,0.00046799966,0.00025085124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825,0.0005547238,0.0002836741,0.0003880142,0.0004360843,0.00008752542],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014676725,0.00011904105,0.00021362389,0.00013073522,0.0011480085,0.00012643832,0.0006187828,0.00018932631,0.009069618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000536872,0.000112086374,0.00013401598,0.0007827938,0.0003694618,0.0014893401,0.0002289258,0.00088943145,0.00074203004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060121366,0.0005501197,0.44815612,0.00016404668,0.00055316614,0.000013122434,0.14292613,0.00065085257,0.005329921,0.34464765,0.045668814,0.010738871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006009322,0.000057065055,0.06996918,0.00016690053,0.00008506413,0.0000025035554,0.11629608,0.00009166212,0.00022325509,0.0009945796,0.81127894,0.00023383767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045959577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003502713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76561016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032707438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006527262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99183625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951183103","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Discussion of Who Pays for Document Discovery in Australia, Canada, Guernsey (Channel Islands), and Singapore and Its Effect on Access to Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Channel (broadcasting); Political science; Law; Geography; Genealogy; History; Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.1171093796009748,"score_gpt":0.4605745481095163,"score_spread":0.34346516850854153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951183103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70172614,0.015381927,0.00041052137,0.23004624,0.002367431,0.012429906,0.0002865723,0.000044902936,0.03730635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939131,0.0013950907,0.000025512974,0.0031817406,0.00009990938,0.00009186736,0.00000864794,0.0000045142933,0.0012796219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989785,0.00022363583,0.00024935478,0.00019778263,0.00019110425,0.00015960267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990736,0.00046438526,0.00014024401,0.00009921264,0.00013498691,0.000087551576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078791514,0.00010049933,0.00029296384,0.00003558742,0.00025159994,0.00012359925,0.00011100151,0.000033081942,0.000036551755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005040716,0.00006306552,0.000019632254,0.00032992935,0.00007699178,0.00060493033,0.00003447093,0.00009491411,0.0000018951537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007317811,0.00052150164,0.0038316725,0.02003722,0.00019198316,0.000007799305,0.067821026,0.000020360994,0.00032712534,0.6477118,0.24285959,0.015938101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008493646,0.0007457599,0.004874028,0.007951721,0.00024915222,0.0000021869423,0.0015490738,0.00002576596,0.000950877,0.0022373595,0.98015785,0.00040683107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20643604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7405928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7372983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008690887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026867233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7988484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951512820","doi":"10.26522/brocked.v28i2.801","title":"Editorial: Where do cross disciplinary interests in educational research merge?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Brock Education Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Brock University","keywords":"Cross disciplinary; Merge (version control); Discipline; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Philosophy; Computer science; Data science; Engineering","score_opus":0.07294816450415988,"score_gpt":0.5145930791552139,"score_spread":0.44164491465105404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951512820","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006729605,0.0019270683,0.0000036463741,0.0338457,0.92157674,0.0005104383,0.000038120208,0.00002115505,0.041404195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012538558,0.0019324316,0.00018007927,0.00006261237,0.8463968,0.00014088697,0.00020450437,0.00006160707,0.1497672],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99188834,0.0019478058,0.0011791703,0.0006411686,0.003486342,0.00085717544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832708,0.006336499,0.0009906179,0.00058763556,0.008181654,0.0006327459],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004712503,0.00033222622,0.00038796588,0.0014562594,0.0021624432,0.0034964632,0.0014938666,0.0013568356,0.007495025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03735594,0.00035126004,0.00017108442,0.002081448,0.0003637364,0.0026001341,0.000174334,0.008789314,0.0016144484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007137644,0.0008150498,0.0020242592,0.000085095155,0.000028211089,4.650122e-7,0.011658811,0.00000921941,0.000006944732,0.0033745167,0.98108804,0.0008379822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033565826,0.00005044461,0.000996289,0.000684928,0.000016002748,0.0000058842597,0.0155120995,4.1569402e-7,5.341842e-7,0.0074969875,0.9745369,0.0003638435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030677326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057489234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115110114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030031714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11811329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951775022","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2898174","title":"Law, Trust and Institutional Change in China: Evidence from Qualitative Fieldwork","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"China; Institutional change; Political science; Law; Qualitative research; Sociology; Public administration; Social science","score_opus":0.10750228776844231,"score_gpt":0.46182052613770486,"score_spread":0.3543182383692626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951775022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7754485,0.0027287845,0.0006520473,0.19593404,0.00076571933,0.00015820998,0.0000041056232,0.000013660844,0.024294937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938597,0.0040501677,0.00015706872,0.0004806065,0.000722909,0.000010160646,0.0000013824022,0.0000029816645,0.00071502593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987228,0.0002487815,0.00014586937,0.00011154517,0.00020368783,0.00056733337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993219,0.00025823194,0.0001860506,0.0001059596,0.0000731581,0.000054696084],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002967736,0.0000570357,0.00007841755,0.000049102975,0.0018635702,0.0003844802,0.00024941115,0.00006363537,0.00015502662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018643491,0.000053987093,0.000021613414,0.0000953584,0.00027322478,0.0022930794,0.000024582703,0.0014319734,0.000012373264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015628322,0.000023398386,0.009261356,7.237216e-7,0.000013204271,0.0000011479817,0.07290236,3.8326053e-7,0.000006246097,0.90591425,0.0000422317,0.01181908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042310564,0.00006569257,0.121713944,0.00011525418,0.000015505255,0.000014107498,0.057834756,0.000024804918,0.000006659818,0.7861567,0.033452466,0.00017700334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11722224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24490578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2184112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041296505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030754737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951987241","doi":"10.29173/alr2526","title":"The Harms Caused: A Narrative of Intergenerational Responsibility","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Witness; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Settlement (finance); Dispute resolution; Indigenous; Narrative; Sociology; Compensation (psychology); Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; History","score_opus":0.036699511141800485,"score_gpt":0.40021869338330907,"score_spread":0.3635191822415086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951987241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033559933,0.010117408,0.00000711802,0.39531583,0.001290948,0.0011357382,0.000004618888,0.00001391753,0.55855453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516756,0.006202736,0.00008184073,0.008470879,0.00009988275,0.000054650165,0.000012048495,0.000005322714,0.03339703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876654,0.00053933205,0.00028111937,0.000111314956,0.00020385458,0.000097844546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976534,0.001574324,0.00017147273,0.0002487622,0.0003176067,0.000034414254],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016308177,0.00004912251,0.000114958464,0.000009398321,0.00037803128,0.000050425075,0.00017944694,0.000026467233,0.0026059293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027065363,0.000032360636,0.00005419405,0.00034649213,0.00017942031,0.0003440143,0.000017704715,0.00012775301,0.00026664618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004984267,0.000024268911,0.00033231557,0.000047993846,0.000013844455,2.4942613e-8,0.006060436,1.9275933e-7,0.000028911234,0.9770277,0.01570908,0.00075023895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036521098,0.000010940909,0.0001726777,0.00014620907,0.0000106038115,2.657567e-7,0.0010701837,0.0000017165349,0.000032292715,0.0011790307,0.99729735,0.000042224987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01501066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051129367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98158824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003948759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006106275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953525916","doi":"","title":"THE JUDGES AND THE JOURNALS: CITATION OF PERIODICAL LITERATURE BY THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA, 1985-2004","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Listing (finance); Citation; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.029198872574553125,"score_gpt":0.33127587282036786,"score_spread":0.30207700024581474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953525916","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001618031,0.18588789,0.0000016784115,0.80381465,0.0001373697,0.00035529636,0.000033559474,0.0000016631293,0.008149853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92207164,0.052965686,0.000014777098,0.023083465,0.00013474193,0.000026561327,0.000007559148,0.000006339134,0.0016892293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985555,0.0006026446,0.0002663846,0.000062494,0.0003460283,0.00016695686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846977,0.00062509684,0.00021780019,0.00022122286,0.00035349862,0.000112629554],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037297807,0.00006070661,0.00012637637,0.000017475013,0.0020531313,0.0002621314,0.00039236344,0.00003416332,0.00019046647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030070338,0.00002505788,0.00004063095,0.00055276375,0.00086520985,0.00012804108,0.000008393292,0.0003295294,0.000002262324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005689098,0.0000073865326,0.00012322293,0.000089720845,0.00004402415,6.344434e-7,0.027246654,0.0000035187684,0.0000032438663,0.53814846,0.42588097,0.008446442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009388132,0.000004053705,0.00087546615,0.00029610118,0.00004005965,0.0000058445894,0.0027170263,9.994912e-7,0.0000022644708,0.0028337503,0.9930948,0.000035740522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9251869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99335855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9204536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020671691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008663365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953754178","doi":"","title":"BOOK REVIEW - COMPTE RENDU - DIRECTORS’ LIABILITY IN CANADA - DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS IN CANADA: LAW AND PRACTICE","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Law; Political science; Accounting; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.03665905153826144,"score_gpt":0.33799145454480234,"score_spread":0.3013324030065409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953754178","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008796337,0.5494534,6.280577e-8,0.3570835,0.00024064339,0.00073452934,0.00001942752,0.0000048356887,0.09158398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10482772,0.49455503,0.000027561635,0.3996829,0.000060206847,0.000031789667,0.000012822467,0.000012559422,0.0007894203],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772984,0.00089651137,0.0004573795,0.00021693479,0.00030004838,0.00039930854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997382,0.0016232635,0.00018137193,0.00025590239,0.00013185918,0.00042559215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004926289,0.0001219373,0.00030675108,0.000046390567,0.0003974734,0.000048684065,0.00019405285,0.00003224747,0.00090712955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049712188,0.00010386574,0.000015692141,0.00086411095,0.00016239918,0.0003920823,0.00001687784,0.0004298276,0.000004394437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007345381,0.000018599667,0.012534289,0.0018871725,0.0000248253,0.00006166297,0.0019279663,7.0215407e-7,3.1049464e-7,0.034137126,0.9209841,0.028415905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043737607,0.0000021252715,0.025464378,0.0014697551,0.000032498712,0.000005510005,0.0005386065,5.075748e-7,2.345998e-7,0.000008963252,0.97231066,0.00012300476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99999875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10394808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058243684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043207064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955881893","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: New Brunswick Graduate Students: Legal and Other Support Services","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduate students; Political science; Public relations; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.2614205500022531,"score_gpt":0.5226560634810431,"score_spread":0.26123551347879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955881893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001285682,0.0005180494,0.0000060949365,0.09966616,0.002135853,0.0005306798,0.00002329498,0.00014349172,0.8956907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018716651,0.0014191284,0.0008259186,0.011617474,0.00417989,0.000017891014,0.00010587892,0.000052178086,0.97990996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948081,0.0007484778,0.0005237213,0.0004982571,0.0028146654,0.0006067977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642915,0.00055373576,0.00025268915,0.00042109788,0.0018453066,0.0004980027],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008243159,0.00022841152,0.00029685974,0.0004748727,0.00087141234,0.0025979804,0.0011082593,0.00041230328,0.005127953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010956286,0.00020512432,0.00005106298,0.0012070158,0.00042201605,0.0014313376,0.0002504207,0.0013690577,0.0012051627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007858009,0.000069397414,0.0013196748,0.000043200875,0.000050939547,0.0000034859004,0.019646,1.06483675e-7,3.120551e-7,0.07918567,0.8981761,0.0014972567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001945889,0.000049166953,0.0002958305,0.000063919666,0.000028321843,0.0000030621095,0.04734999,6.827459e-7,0.0000019386978,0.0030426437,0.948736,0.0002338248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6937194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31280342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38091597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002454402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021950362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957179129","doi":"10.1177/1477878519862543","title":"Academic freedom in primary and secondary school teaching","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison","keywords":"Academic freedom; Accountability; Sociology; Pedagogy; Discipline; Autonomy; Higher education; Mathematics education; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.0516342208302493,"score_gpt":0.4737615604211061,"score_spread":0.4221273395908568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957179129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76652646,0.00069072325,0.0000019530298,0.016835602,0.00033611982,0.00026824794,5.7699606e-7,0.000007736636,0.21533257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905113,0.00062044594,0.00012260598,0.00048265283,0.00024642784,0.00003575568,0.0000063143007,0.000004423766,0.007970055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997331,0.0019545413,0.00014380799,0.00016044342,0.00020600314,0.00020419782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829715,0.001413658,0.000033371125,0.00009707169,0.00006941728,0.00008931475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01412852,0.000041033378,0.00006273591,0.00041301321,0.0002902471,0.0001089103,0.00011040377,0.0000986791,0.0004017425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019688397,0.000040173396,0.0000054005745,0.0004589947,0.0002296297,0.0009706922,0.00003910141,0.0016810469,0.00005728393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044510198,0.00010037181,0.04321735,0.000035879737,0.00000168478,1.8199384e-7,0.033614825,9.572999e-7,0.00047122806,0.8445668,0.0012943005,0.0766519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036516838,0.000033909724,0.3355436,0.00016959231,0.0000018745747,0.0000026918417,0.13888852,0.000012467746,0.000017271874,0.26654857,0.2582803,0.0001359892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025528003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000246138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57801825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000184416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002536009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7303406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957687304","doi":"","title":"Practices of Ethics: An Empirical approach to Ethics in Social Sciences researchces of Ethics: An Empirical approach to Ethics in Social Sciences research","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Linguistic Association","funders":"","keywords":"Applied ethics; Meta-ethics; Information ethics; Research ethics; Normative ethics; Engineering ethics; Nursing ethics; Sociology; Business ethics; Empirical research; Ethics of technology; Social science; Political science; Epistemology; Public relations; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8450983083599324,"score_gpt":0.6954978706098945,"score_spread":0.14960043775003784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957687304","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2444657,0.00003846091,0.0005255277,0.50415534,0.000227031,0.0015226924,0.000014214889,0.000064921944,0.24898614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94670385,0.000092813716,0.03981919,0.011393821,0.0008768132,0.00031106223,0.000015370999,0.000028846624,0.0007582615],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95897,0.027620362,0.001527515,0.0015168566,0.008703034,0.0016621964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9648809,0.027890414,0.000752066,0.00046711927,0.005520063,0.0004894401],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17013319,0.00032168932,0.0006586895,0.002599922,0.007112403,0.0016316015,0.003111976,0.0023648052,0.00028775155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15600266,0.00028847173,0.00010960041,0.017477084,0.010554434,0.0051252083,0.0006005232,0.016652156,0.00006407977],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007338606,0.0023022434,0.017604226,0.00014360453,0.000011733117,5.442063e-7,0.6357056,0.00010849517,0.00027673683,0.33561903,0.007323278,0.00083116133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044007742,0.0009513467,0.03817563,0.000084445346,0.000014277498,0.0000020623852,0.86843395,0.0014899857,0.00018418476,0.041370973,0.048209623,0.00064342556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13302684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053645052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70223814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047313463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032676075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2958383422","doi":"10.11575/prism/36484","title":"Building a regional academic integrity network: Profiling the growth and action of the Academic Integrity Council of Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Data integrity; Profiling (computer programming); Political science; Computer security; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.2807528854942269,"score_gpt":0.4331516668988155,"score_spread":0.15239878140458862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2958383422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94749784,0.00005649147,0.000024468749,0.022451146,0.00046888023,0.0005234531,0.0000029953885,0.0000011902382,0.02897355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99425906,0.0000447602,0.0017526585,0.0002692971,0.00014344453,0.000009112738,0.0000014043584,0.0000033609788,0.0035169248],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873036,0.00025960238,0.0002761459,0.00015321742,0.00043753785,0.00014315071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858,0.0004960566,0.0003950422,0.0001452954,0.0003528242,0.000030810468],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040173815,0.00006468619,0.00011754272,0.000017730184,0.00034011417,0.000067621,0.0005662954,0.00018538827,0.00041097112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012626706,0.0000408192,0.00003200177,0.0004272266,0.00025893896,0.00076721876,0.00013951806,0.0024072295,0.000008084165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019140655,0.000090320405,0.48851925,0.00003348935,0.00008017917,1.1061801e-7,0.19123283,0.000036883222,0.010775641,0.28120497,0.0046984865,0.023136443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046171187,0.000043337033,0.076698124,0.00029937635,0.000083888095,0.0000069060293,0.028063767,0.000115996445,0.0057917833,0.018737482,0.8694764,0.00022123553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.107547306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052867126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8647779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046112924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009898681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959795522","doi":"10.19164/sjppar.v1i2.874","title":"Empathy in the legal profession and its role in shaping my career","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; York University; Northumbria University","keywords":"Empathy; Legal profession; Context (archaeology); Legal practice; Psychology; Reflection (computer programming); Legal education; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Law; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.19449554009059825,"score_gpt":0.5655366004028717,"score_spread":0.37104106031227346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959795522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7255671,0.002394309,4.3085947e-7,0.26547074,0.00031529894,0.0004342397,6.4398597e-7,0.0000015364526,0.0058157193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925661,0.0025550579,0.00001879325,0.001972108,0.000389584,0.000018618908,4.5386517e-7,0.0000053203034,0.0024739665],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.992892,0.004467659,0.00045262172,0.00013547135,0.0017338858,0.00031831698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99319506,0.0057445033,0.0003274639,0.000095080984,0.0005678611,0.00007004686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03409114,0.00007297699,0.00013193423,0.00026375876,0.0007111089,0.00015507745,0.00061391416,0.00013642659,0.00007503766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005556272,0.00003885796,0.000020935697,0.0008216852,0.00015291339,0.0024958288,0.00020020496,0.0052501033,0.00002078258],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061802875,0.0005540973,0.0745286,0.00004866209,0.00003873852,0.000035555655,0.7246353,0.000010256824,0.002892657,0.18418117,0.0056143273,0.0068425895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052413176,0.00007741665,0.091874,0.00026560578,0.000010008882,0.000041164807,0.8050186,0.00003344235,0.00002286909,0.0023765047,0.09969042,0.000065819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005596648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011020908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.266999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095702315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012112857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961418416","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3415599","title":"Journal Prestige and Journal Impact in Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prestige; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012732384390847009,"score_gpt":0.365687329738637,"score_spread":0.35295494534779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961418416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9115488,0.0026156467,0.00026240086,0.042611025,0.0013179545,0.00014758839,8.0095845e-7,0.00001336443,0.0414824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895631,0.0052009793,0.00009435512,0.00044852172,0.0009535938,8.1081447e-7,4.3923492e-7,0.000011430143,0.0037267813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713826,0.00043888134,0.0003691135,0.00010174314,0.00042986174,0.0015221328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989137,0.00017227443,0.00034544658,0.00007800607,0.00026135932,0.0002292329],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00733174,0.00010474976,0.00014509086,0.00023924324,0.00096290646,0.0010200234,0.00027507974,0.00009240864,0.0007625861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005460969,0.000086170425,0.00008068783,0.00042325756,0.00013603436,0.002134044,0.00001615544,0.0058636502,0.00006477316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050904928,0.000093945106,0.038691226,0.0000017456616,0.000079150195,0.000008463468,0.007388668,0.000040024417,0.00010866768,0.94138306,0.0011423979,0.011011719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014796016,0.00044654,0.013729322,0.00005300296,0.000031373238,0.0057930206,0.034509916,0.000023966535,0.0000072196335,0.6207989,0.32283497,0.0002921697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017645269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007555055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3216926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001607757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014919628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99642986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963085997","doi":"10.29173/alr2542","title":"When Should Casinos Owe a Duty of Care Toward Their Patrons?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Estate; Business; Liability; Appeal; Loyalty; Duty of care; Advertising; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Marketing; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.07263300254091878,"score_gpt":0.38517237982872665,"score_spread":0.3125393772878079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963085997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004759167,0.036097866,0.0000039181805,0.1321097,0.0006862044,0.0009947366,0.0000122437705,0.000023803372,0.8253124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97049713,0.011498787,0.00017102603,0.011775993,0.00011054561,0.00003834111,0.000026053796,0.000011403086,0.005870708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989059,0.0002474862,0.00029731132,0.00016237538,0.00021579285,0.00017115765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859995,0.0005197743,0.00019856865,0.00032673866,0.0002878419,0.00006711418],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004342777,0.00009149812,0.00025956935,0.000020042777,0.0001368367,0.000047449594,0.00025416914,0.00006474517,0.0051619266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006292631,0.00007212787,0.00011066788,0.00032149898,0.00009882063,0.00042782372,0.000027784197,0.00018665736,0.00055303826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003701601,0.00005745121,0.0026764155,0.001312081,0.00003262809,2.6214676e-7,0.034899108,1.4899742e-7,0.0000112546995,0.9252443,0.021705087,0.014057586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058451707,0.00002037837,0.00013898866,0.00056941056,0.00004023849,8.772969e-7,0.0023738607,2.5225248e-7,0.000026381222,0.0003870703,0.9962906,0.00009347419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07843629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032437574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97458553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005457668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004913327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963329446","doi":"","title":"ETRE JURISTE AU FEMININ : UNE REALITE EMERGENTE OU UNE QUETE ILLUSOIRE?","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender equality; Political science; Accountability; Humanities; Legal profession; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Art","score_opus":0.06865302323928603,"score_gpt":0.37850059491814736,"score_spread":0.30984757167886134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963329446","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014338145,0.06386135,0.000005896547,0.59800947,0.0022375586,0.00036885243,0.00005195844,0.000017682587,0.33530384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15530966,0.21913792,0.00016603904,0.13235725,0.00270134,0.000106201434,0.00013724387,0.00006839544,0.49001595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653345,0.0014277844,0.00062769634,0.00031588692,0.0003754994,0.0007196815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974167,0.00032442168,0.00039472303,0.00073858845,0.0003354816,0.0007900977],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003924693,0.00024059205,0.00037618246,0.000087241155,0.001759016,0.00017045399,0.00066769257,0.00015930728,0.0060923067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00166508,0.00020289833,0.00017326517,0.0026415314,0.0006159716,0.00040346975,0.000028331891,0.00068632053,0.005185837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.6557976e-7,0.000012075422,0.00006074096,0.0003230367,0.000029308574,0.0000023518385,0.0041579553,7.687338e-7,3.165824e-7,0.46197262,0.40534842,0.12809172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006962175,0.000017819037,0.0014315096,0.0014196939,0.00020977925,0.000009325206,0.0005735938,0.000012107346,4.590302e-7,0.0021943855,0.99381,0.000251723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9437014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9792064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5884616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009946002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00642993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963525119","doi":"10.29173/alr2546","title":"Measuring the Impacts of Representation in Legal Aid and Community Legal Services Settings: Considerations for Canadian Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Legal service; Legal research; Representation (politics); Empirical research; Public relations; Economic Justice; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Service (business); Legal psychology; Business; Sociology; Law; Marketing; Politics","score_opus":0.15929843749944847,"score_gpt":0.4498071380500514,"score_spread":0.29050870055060296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963525119","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30148944,0.0050480044,5.7291635e-7,0.39694425,0.0002357872,0.0027527655,0.00001572933,0.00000901508,0.29350442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99271387,0.0013210198,0.000087277185,0.0052291076,0.000034636432,0.00006652108,0.000014190496,0.000005206999,0.000528151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997683,0.0015309664,0.00027361175,0.00010121417,0.00020530114,0.00020589244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99382806,0.0052595683,0.00011532734,0.00026645433,0.00044979944,0.00008079964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056507867,0.000052114276,0.00013913531,0.00006902965,0.0012325976,0.00021582107,0.0001606061,0.0000399338,0.00018018122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048410203,0.00004266891,0.000026591051,0.0005485578,0.00015396587,0.00091422634,0.0000242413,0.00045418512,0.000017045182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035449361,0.00003628968,0.0053120162,0.0007983924,0.000014581929,1.816955e-7,0.019757388,0.0000015680904,0.0000363878,0.9702395,0.0033506833,0.00044943826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013668904,0.000020593408,0.0021621825,0.00088240067,0.000017458258,0.000003049035,0.009183122,0.000012114915,0.000039687027,0.0024771197,0.984998,0.00006761504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9807636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9816473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008644414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011450992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9480269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965447505","doi":"","title":"Against Elected Judges in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chose; Argument (complex analysis); Construct (python library); Citation; Political science; Law; Politics; Economic Justice; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Computer science; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.013225128555833273,"score_gpt":0.30279215466407267,"score_spread":0.28956702610823937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965447505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46005538,0.0000034071984,7.457e-7,0.030990629,0.00020244074,0.000046587822,2.6131536e-7,0.000008402064,0.50869215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763807,0.0000069579405,0.00006341339,0.0048711407,0.000029571615,0.000002674487,0.0000031751945,0.0000014734065,0.018640878],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961317,0.00004685259,0.00006774118,0.000053452302,0.00011640652,0.000102354206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997324,0.0001081287,0.000020464888,0.000053553267,0.000058717156,0.000026787573],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014934158,0.000020005255,0.00002989128,0.00003084155,0.00005619731,0.00003272855,0.00006536929,0.0000145434715,0.00419553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002544458,0.000019244471,0.000004053498,0.00049345894,0.000008236985,0.00021580262,0.0000037148661,0.00009489105,0.00016707659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027826993,0.00003500394,0.61996454,0.0000023158507,0.0000044234116,0.000001072143,0.006062042,0.000013767776,0.00022405486,0.24998522,0.11691589,0.006788907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057785208,0.0000014621813,0.07265619,0.0000011736912,3.559911e-7,3.7024133e-8,0.011691783,0.000019427773,0.000040293966,0.00015534728,0.91533184,0.0000442913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99510056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79841596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003464386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065863677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966384940","doi":"10.53300/001c.7956","title":"‘The Difficulties of Communication Encountered by Indigenous Peoples’: Moving Beyond Indigenous Deficit in the Model Admission Rules for Legal Practitioners","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Injustice; Project commissioning; Economic Justice; Public relations; Political science; Law; Legal practice; Sociology; Publishing; Geography","score_opus":0.02226790612203242,"score_gpt":0.3652694916856441,"score_spread":0.34300158556361166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966384940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5932763,0.11958966,0.0005074011,0.22617441,0.0016497672,0.010131376,0.00013383004,0.00009223199,0.04844497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9278055,0.054916885,0.0015764214,0.0063233776,0.00011001082,0.0010187033,0.0005283811,0.00002397062,0.007696776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997846,0.00059458223,0.00064221973,0.00020106367,0.0004474018,0.0002687519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679464,0.0013249288,0.00074165774,0.00052295387,0.000557925,0.000057895362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025576511,0.00014065362,0.00022304751,0.00009292336,0.0011560733,0.0003655874,0.0006869993,0.00009300553,0.00008672285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002042233,0.00010023065,0.00009497806,0.00065011653,0.00012827094,0.0012772377,0.000025745934,0.00038678158,0.00003357308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007411893,0.0021998272,0.0019725296,0.001978778,0.000068487214,1.5539496e-7,0.28445798,0.00018522984,0.0004333105,0.49556702,0.15050486,0.06255769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016292972,0.00003783349,0.00080396596,0.0006739494,0.000057970978,0.000004001386,0.065950215,0.00007208053,0.0000193077,0.0011440928,0.9308883,0.00018538556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00967623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043802573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7803834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024323264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00559614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99691844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967239148","doi":"","title":"From Law to Legal Studies and Beyond: 50 Years of Law and Legal Studies at Carleton University","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Legal profession; Legal realism; Legal education; Perspective (graphical); International Legal English Certificate; Legal history; Comparative law; Sociology; Black letter law; Private law; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.02292183018962755,"score_gpt":0.33876846026738766,"score_spread":0.3158466300777601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967239148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9504991,0.0042245756,0.000006314807,0.028589223,0.00038178152,0.00010369058,0.000005957559,0.000010497662,0.016178828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98565596,0.0041315607,0.000113151604,0.00088350865,0.00017492616,4.1890343e-7,9.019091e-7,0.0000049449814,0.009034639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988876,0.00015188244,0.00013278569,0.00013821747,0.00021188252,0.00047760812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931383,0.00025596542,0.00011995071,0.00007384019,0.00017023261,0.00006615533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010029187,0.00006953293,0.00016626314,0.00006103841,0.00049951597,0.00005246312,0.00010644271,0.00004148848,0.000026149259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012898678,0.00007009916,0.000027266009,0.00016711564,0.0002689498,0.00083031814,0.00007454214,0.00057885563,0.000012542852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040412444,0.000014971242,0.0006573079,0.0000035720993,0.000209116,0.000001516952,0.016125806,0.0000016476786,0.00020059024,0.981689,0.00038914103,0.0006669259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004017542,0.00016737083,0.0008831347,0.000018515486,0.00006848628,0.000017166225,0.19233464,4.5861918e-7,0.000050229075,0.04633403,0.7596007,0.00012349262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021868242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08965851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93535495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063686405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010431156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98464525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969053532","doi":"10.29173/mlj973","title":"A Sign of Things to Come: Legal and Public Policy Issues Raised by the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in Green v. Law Society of Manitoba","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Sign (mathematics); Economic Justice; Precedent; Legal profession; Sociology","score_opus":0.03907506795424565,"score_gpt":0.34518592907804824,"score_spread":0.3061108611238026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969053532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71105516,0.00013572889,0.00005956552,0.25681782,0.0003686162,0.00024594238,0.000027201688,0.0000051012603,0.031284858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700725,0.000065706045,0.0005022805,0.0020584117,0.00022207978,0.0000025725387,0.0000011022698,0.000006780944,0.00013383117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984108,0.00017909854,0.00043258508,0.00009938043,0.00064637937,0.00023175633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816877,0.00034894372,0.00056986656,0.00022733622,0.00055804214,0.0001270409],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001824627,0.00008449727,0.00019642818,0.000047875918,0.0013944687,0.00037922317,0.0006163657,0.00006337771,0.00006544956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007997607,0.0000664453,0.000050540795,0.00024346274,0.0004950538,0.0012021374,0.00008440388,0.00037234067,6.219744e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010922594,0.0003274132,0.036464266,0.0000501441,0.00012701907,0.0000048332936,0.0285253,0.000006829357,0.0017575221,0.73296916,0.18070248,0.018955823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007561466,0.00008303883,0.026673604,0.000097345095,0.000019017736,0.000018008286,0.11919767,0.000027046803,0.0007474483,0.010736769,0.8414757,0.00016819075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7222324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019554951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016786198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970327687","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3435517","title":"Celebrating 30 Years of the Indigenous Blacks &amp;amp; Mi’kmaq Initiative: How the Creation of a Critical Mass of Black and Aboriginal Lawyers is Making a Difference in Nova Scotia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Indigenous; Nova (rocket); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Public administration; Library science; Gerontology; Medicine; Ethnology; Engineering","score_opus":0.029834560001898332,"score_gpt":0.3702716531340506,"score_spread":0.34043709313215226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970327687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98738855,0.00014329203,0.00050615007,0.00883817,0.00012491707,0.00017240905,0.0000044774547,0.000002562757,0.0028194417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991772,0.0001626737,0.00018764811,0.00015857222,0.000058150355,0.0000011910414,6.71747e-7,0.000005974172,0.00024787572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841124,0.00035562803,0.0002790967,0.00010017039,0.0003676035,0.0004862844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998637,0.0005354314,0.00040926988,0.00012451959,0.0002710254,0.000022714437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018216724,0.00006876719,0.00013670968,0.00009485466,0.00014975558,0.000074347714,0.00024303149,0.00006509136,0.00016950247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086623686,0.00005178978,0.000044580353,0.00058976107,0.00045518985,0.0003005606,0.000015753827,0.0011197904,0.0000052684136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059100905,0.00022359432,0.25589725,0.00006916687,0.000105248895,3.2171573e-7,0.25381094,0.000031301788,0.007375702,0.4782839,0.00007308156,0.004070342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018606809,0.00043276427,0.44088542,0.00068974175,0.0002538516,0.000059934166,0.31080523,0.00015527928,0.0018725693,0.23461892,0.007800308,0.0005653074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027907928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016301125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24366501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018700607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004362576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9096411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970334012","doi":"10.24926/25730037.588","title":"Uncommon Misconceptions: Holding Physicians Accountable for Insemination Fraud","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of law & inequality","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insemination; Donor insemination; Business; Medicine; Artificial insemination; Andrology; Biology; Pregnancy; Genetics","score_opus":0.07735484224371605,"score_gpt":0.41590747485339324,"score_spread":0.33855263260967716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970334012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9394412,0.00012990447,0.001148728,0.015867878,0.0016223614,0.0002943066,0.000018813022,0.000017961198,0.041458845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946057,0.000045734847,0.0015326632,0.0016967991,0.0007246499,0.000009917496,0.000012041916,0.000009589025,0.0013628599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984783,0.0002614003,0.0005361938,0.0001153162,0.00040517378,0.00020360296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972213,0.0007998875,0.0007527918,0.0001584272,0.0010095298,0.00005808786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030737775,0.000086486,0.00020829764,0.00008206481,0.0004351131,0.00021515714,0.0002558834,0.00008866952,0.00041366398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008485594,0.00008473183,0.00010823601,0.0004105102,0.00009542055,0.0023266517,0.00001373747,0.00028619907,0.000032562708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116717914,0.00063951046,0.01886176,0.000093757764,0.00008468376,9.724528e-7,0.038135592,0.00012981723,0.00515926,0.8996299,0.020626063,0.016521972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054105435,0.00011248001,0.0035750861,0.00009777798,0.000039857077,0.0000030311764,0.009844062,0.000027647504,0.00092948996,0.0065510944,0.97812426,0.00015413569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015685264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006686653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9574982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020753605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042755454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45293304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972459874","doi":"","title":"Critical Perspectives on the Scholarship of Assessment and Learning in Law: Volume 1: England","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coursework; Scholarship; Set (abstract data type); Argument (complex analysis); Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.08721678299086998,"score_gpt":0.44103480732303074,"score_spread":0.35381802433216075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972459874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8102628,0.00007610905,0.000010045177,0.048487116,0.0001323176,0.00037118263,0.000019050349,0.000032495675,0.14060889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98681045,0.00022977724,0.00047307523,0.00016820867,0.00013184524,0.000002440672,0.000009812243,0.000011992667,0.012162427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956077,0.002566098,0.00018352356,0.0003609204,0.0008292586,0.0004525137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949797,0.0036464396,0.00008044921,0.00027547174,0.0008784163,0.00013953],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004409057,0.00011502563,0.00017820677,0.00064258144,0.0008946489,0.00018787966,0.00046863366,0.00014532608,0.00092192343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004159493,0.00010702523,0.000052928655,0.001874576,0.0011654901,0.0008876045,0.00015158112,0.0022006887,0.00005825827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008563348,0.00037948915,0.050918687,0.000015522399,0.000017299952,0.00002343512,0.014872789,0.000008837441,0.000106007865,0.9326009,0.00037950114,0.00059187686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091976277,0.0003937345,0.09522979,0.00012663346,0.000015116301,0.0000013324955,0.23366773,0.00018508107,0.000040182276,0.005184016,0.6640033,0.00023329385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006322912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046046376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9274169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048938964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001052317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974933195","doi":"","title":"Orphans No More: A Review of Elizabeth Sanderson, Government Lawyering: Duties and Ethical Challenges of Government Lawyers (Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, 2018)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Parliament; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Public administration; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04522551080187164,"score_gpt":0.3766295842658902,"score_spread":0.33140407346401857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974933195","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000025962615,0.9577653,0.000016304115,0.016281487,0.0006177293,0.0004098308,0.00006468458,0.0000075761554,0.024834514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00029352919,0.99623185,0.00006820603,0.00056453416,0.00051988923,0.000024698855,0.000005101618,0.00003013129,0.0022620463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472535,0.0007764454,0.0010537527,0.00030371483,0.001988258,0.0011524829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969759,0.000503242,0.0017211005,0.00028589292,0.00033401255,0.00017984165],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062831817,0.0003226168,0.0011278868,0.000023636214,0.0003610636,0.000048516893,0.00050321076,0.00036198154,0.0004635715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015642786,0.0002708356,0.0002449951,0.00022353642,0.00040512616,0.000245029,0.00007120813,0.0028507737,0.0000041458575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023110491,0.00013263336,0.000007314729,0.022214524,0.0010657284,0.000001933102,0.0029619683,5.2319724e-8,4.925392e-7,0.6679231,0.033714257,0.27195492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010937373,0.0001657523,0.0000025359834,0.013565583,0.0004749603,0.00003866011,0.010270259,2.1683557e-7,7.0787075e-7,0.0010155815,0.974111,0.0002453723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2002724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7799422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9403967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076224576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028038172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977658000","doi":"","title":"Legal, Ethical and Privacy Issues Affecting Data Sharing among Ontario's Higher Education Institutions in Interinstitutional Collaboration.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The College Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Legal responsibility; Public relations; Political science; Information privacy; Sociology; Internet privacy; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.08851696382790589,"score_gpt":0.419153417160577,"score_spread":0.3306364533326711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977658000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79544044,0.00006316629,0.000025542182,0.12523274,0.0019032869,0.00061705476,0.000018851839,0.000047245132,0.076651685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97921795,0.00000765976,0.0004309836,0.0014070439,0.00032200734,0.000046554436,0.00005836078,0.0000063461353,0.018503115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998697,0.00022860318,0.0002794752,0.00033146542,0.00027276383,0.00019071296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886286,0.00024572774,0.00012378664,0.00050725054,0.00019296251,0.000067412264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014228614,0.00010067729,0.00011801917,0.00013385105,0.00081461825,0.00059150206,0.00057966524,0.00014047026,0.00090667635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029871447,0.00008957206,0.000015281585,0.00086180156,0.00029070931,0.002584561,0.00008716057,0.0007471096,0.0000768123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001366378,0.00010103292,0.014543415,0.00000856296,0.000011652139,9.877577e-7,0.04058013,0.000009935782,0.00003400361,0.9342019,0.010018417,0.00047632476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022073342,0.0000406136,0.0698317,0.000061477935,0.000012528221,0.0000038320077,0.023919882,0.00008657554,0.0000020446375,0.0034161336,0.9022692,0.00013530256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16287877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41973242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9307857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003777906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004107792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977837159","doi":"10.3968/11249","title":"The Value of Supervision of Administrative Reconsideration Under the Vision of People’s Supervision Theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Value (mathematics); Ideology; China; Sinicization; Function (biology); Control (management); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Epistemology; Law; Management; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04631595663752021,"score_gpt":0.3851029560516821,"score_spread":0.3387869994141619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977837159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79793173,0.000064175336,0.000039277056,0.032225635,0.0007098298,0.00041019253,0.0000177254,0.000005529793,0.16859591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99896336,0.000034128887,0.00004910772,0.00036767314,0.0000577724,0.000004020975,0.0000021142819,0.0000034654852,0.0005183645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828,0.00045493682,0.00030335374,0.00015113296,0.00057881884,0.00023179027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974541,0.001195607,0.00024224939,0.00020560794,0.0008000652,0.000102369864],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046222922,0.000060309478,0.000112881935,0.00010719616,0.0016478363,0.00011411403,0.0005010835,0.00006981383,0.00036934018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013754353,0.000040262177,0.000051383235,0.0015539859,0.0015585214,0.00066906156,0.0000276412,0.00015812878,0.000010850929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008282662,0.000015191248,0.0027303991,0.000003899461,0.0000037448256,3.4167485e-8,0.038409367,0.0000031340473,0.0021460233,0.95178336,0.00045377956,0.0044427575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028072592,0.00021208481,0.14307119,0.00006528858,0.00002976833,0.0000011157258,0.73200995,0.00015633473,0.003924372,0.05814314,0.06186958,0.00023644925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070974894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13851333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8936403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018647479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065281773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979150231","doi":"10.29173/alr2562","title":"Back to Burgess: The Impact of the White Burgess Expert Evidence Regime in Alberta Decisions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Function (biology); Law; White paper; Economic Justice; White (mutation); Work (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0823747958156161,"score_gpt":0.4340354438458232,"score_spread":0.35166064803020713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979150231","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024696011,0.014182478,0.0000043613895,0.625698,0.0008454129,0.0023319249,0.0000028481977,0.000006525884,0.33223248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9012711,0.020267308,0.00006919658,0.02256456,0.00012431254,0.00013116487,0.0000029978555,0.000019437954,0.055549897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780786,0.0007416222,0.00051470654,0.00025673903,0.0003878776,0.00029121723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934987,0.0048671225,0.00028578425,0.0009861519,0.00025349896,0.000108767286],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016125088,0.00014132622,0.00031556626,0.000037354162,0.00026688608,0.00010436872,0.0009903774,0.00006798544,0.0073364456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008424591,0.00007483288,0.00021567907,0.0020449152,0.00015755554,0.0007744195,0.00011552023,0.00028916917,0.0014808176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002893986,0.00027745648,0.045313712,0.0001932092,0.00007711695,3.6181285e-7,0.03995342,0.00003343091,0.000104106315,0.5441601,0.36270034,0.007157785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057171117,0.00001899128,0.004227956,0.0041715875,0.000018064424,0.0000018999406,0.00038521216,0.000003863838,0.0000074875775,0.0002691422,0.99071133,0.0001272992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3889857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11195865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8765751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012773565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000784101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979507979","doi":"","title":"Prosecutors and Wrongful Convictions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Conviction; Injustice; Sanctions; Law; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.024178780701517605,"score_gpt":0.37874686615631087,"score_spread":0.35456808545479324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979507979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36698595,0.0009646413,0.002957805,0.34194383,0.0024223842,0.0002819521,0.0000027582237,0.00007546545,0.28436524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812261,0.0022197324,0.00010755729,0.00018105406,0.0005857106,0.0000041154967,4.6058557e-7,0.000005125294,0.015670184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988243,0.00007426144,0.000108283995,0.00008158065,0.00015568992,0.0007559086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940795,0.000062484025,0.00018726668,0.0001309736,0.00013307319,0.00007823946],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018059646,0.000047229474,0.000053055213,0.00005175099,0.00417307,0.0007326719,0.00021122678,0.000046510533,0.00013972915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012374306,0.00004470161,0.00002368027,0.00006438078,0.00020983588,0.0010946651,0.000016596328,0.0013248852,0.000036762656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030408755,0.000019561536,0.005788562,4.5703803e-7,0.00002027622,2.5645053e-7,0.0031662749,1.06402986e-7,0.000015353186,0.9810483,0.00036160505,0.00957621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016567999,0.000040341412,0.0065048058,0.000005480422,0.000018034278,0.000054622666,0.022538144,0.0000028770744,0.000008398822,0.48789704,0.48267585,0.00008871687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002441375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0108612105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6142401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031355387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054287156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99712336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980332991","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2019.1658447","title":"The place of responsibility in tort liability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Liability; Law; Business; Law and economics; Strict liability; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01722289274259608,"score_gpt":0.3918854189141845,"score_spread":0.3746625261715884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980332991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8714545,0.000037317815,0.0000054751813,0.022226233,0.00044983026,0.0002418897,0.0000012596805,0.000011714819,0.10557181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99143314,0.000029398392,0.0001308138,0.00015143529,0.00003407088,0.000009889665,2.7660388e-7,0.0000017512195,0.008209244],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988638,0.0003888175,0.00021519017,0.00012847566,0.00027064706,0.00013304006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974781,0.0019033654,0.00010162023,0.00032129546,0.0001663686,0.00002923376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004081246,0.000035048706,0.00006458817,0.000028524497,0.00016000263,0.00004902032,0.00026331234,0.000045658377,0.00030742318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048038233,0.000027063754,0.000022034876,0.0005938902,0.00020499114,0.00038246182,0.000025373676,0.00020072561,0.00009708229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001043413,0.00014996849,0.6793929,0.00001261785,0.0000031511847,2.7414893e-7,0.019396214,0.000013093373,0.0003239247,0.29470977,0.0028957345,0.0029980163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072217976,0.000015854843,0.4405924,0.00000964257,0.0000010468418,1.0811428e-7,0.0046498496,0.000014435238,0.00019962413,0.00400558,0.5503898,0.000049393042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051696575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072423276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5474941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011059719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011283559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.781501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981421646","doi":"10.1111/jols.12188","title":"Cause Lawyers, Political Violence, and Professionalism in Conflict","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Legitimation; Politics; Authoritarianism; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political science; Law; Legal profession; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06107308592062757,"score_gpt":0.4206858060744832,"score_spread":0.3596127201538556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981421646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92069757,0.00032507986,0.000004088621,0.03490196,0.00037003457,0.00007323316,0.0000017491768,0.0000034752934,0.04362281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927424,0.0005483494,0.00023418706,0.005679433,0.000120438686,5.644723e-7,3.4344228e-7,0.0000019795984,0.0006722983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941564,0.0000871281,0.00016355005,0.00004838418,0.00016730648,0.000118008844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994498,0.00022051565,0.00009346862,0.000030617633,0.00012811164,0.00007748817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072378165,0.000033577577,0.0000858821,0.000015893358,0.00014489445,0.00006719144,0.000044588753,0.00006796217,0.00008956632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083515486,0.000026770742,0.000029881272,0.00008888152,0.00016768015,0.0004406862,0.000011266633,0.00029715215,0.0000025169973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004253093,0.000033528173,0.012516763,0.0000066849393,0.000009502685,9.917885e-7,0.015478307,1.083868e-7,0.00004706062,0.9706394,0.0011083405,0.00015505859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074670924,0.00005066031,0.029503295,0.00019758867,0.00001830916,0.000022479848,0.053279195,0.000012629953,0.000020680081,0.021755341,0.894284,0.00010912083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011895029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009613555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94888407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035944853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033761846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17981805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981598777","doi":"","title":"Why Couldn’t You Just Keep Your Knees Together? L’obligation déontologique des juges face aux victimes de violences sexuelles (The Ethics of Judging Sexual Assault Cases)","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Obligation; Relevance (law); Law; Statement (logic); Mythology; Sexual assault; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.10826859524913385,"score_gpt":0.43006578195797607,"score_spread":0.3217971867088422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981598777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5821644,0.015685309,0.01143967,0.3851213,0.0017081024,0.00027645985,0.000018342913,0.000041388874,0.0035450659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964247,0.022117779,0.000471892,0.0013468115,0.0011530764,0.000015488366,0.000005258509,0.00002751495,0.010615211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99434906,0.0018843547,0.0006593718,0.00031741845,0.00083972403,0.0019500542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951032,0.001535048,0.001577718,0.00041999493,0.0012054458,0.00015861589],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01302397,0.00029479334,0.00032495375,0.00014049464,0.006654275,0.0010064284,0.0011831974,0.00064008683,0.00021696895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007897314,0.00024741117,0.00014252074,0.00045804813,0.0020916983,0.0024129956,0.00007908686,0.007634717,0.000029809056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008581172,0.00035573178,0.029892176,0.00009668351,0.00059735874,0.000010334516,0.12068454,0.0008580248,0.0007608424,0.684693,0.0017958087,0.16016972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046065316,0.00060513645,0.0046753255,0.0002591944,0.00039732386,0.0005995681,0.60322005,0.0007123681,0.0006268966,0.2550298,0.13289832,0.0005153929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049587872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105655275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48253548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012712923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021531481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981722395","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2019.1667083","title":"Perils, pitfalls and possibilities: introducing reflective practice effectively in legal education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective practice; Transformative learning; Praxis; Reflection (computer programming); Lifelong learning; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Professional development; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.014808671205297972,"score_gpt":0.3753946938249983,"score_spread":0.3605860226197003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981722395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44501463,0.000121462974,0.00000693098,0.0583336,0.00045318675,0.0003728502,4.7465798e-7,0.000025657537,0.4956712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97369486,0.000017663118,0.00040514368,0.003285983,0.00039823342,0.00004141985,0.000001857144,0.000008689693,0.022146123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983356,0.000951939,0.00014464227,0.00021201409,0.00018272108,0.00017306792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985634,0.0009088981,0.0001069741,0.00020844264,0.00017541855,0.000036833335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026218898,0.000074377946,0.00008970454,0.00004890744,0.00033999878,0.00027502273,0.00012915791,0.00006338589,0.0003726669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023457538,0.000059027254,0.000016909082,0.00038330597,0.00018537242,0.0016332108,0.00002558733,0.00049182255,0.000111842106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003960376,0.00017082086,0.0016584994,0.000006498448,0.000012164523,1.4327966e-7,0.15912238,0.0000026424393,0.00020389297,0.8343338,0.0012749693,0.0031745925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020976321,0.000049086582,0.013625342,0.000025082156,0.000019507062,0.000005185542,0.17964664,0.000012834261,0.000047978163,0.010231179,0.79598284,0.00014455616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0702507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005665804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82410264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026588095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081999315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93594056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982079010","doi":"","title":"Book Review: The Great Juristic Bazaar: Jurists","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bazaar; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02639164592830234,"score_gpt":0.35850178302131475,"score_spread":0.3321101370930124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982079010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001132987,0.048303366,0.00019465544,0.34871307,0.0006926925,0.00014411924,0.000002166527,0.000030039522,0.60190856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47757384,0.11245608,0.00094427547,0.3727985,0.0038925656,0.000043323118,0.0000139573385,0.00004080096,0.032236658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984857,0.00028804893,0.00032563935,0.00012050802,0.0004952803,0.00028481078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887174,0.00017249488,0.00025582573,0.0002103719,0.00031735108,0.00017222755],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014873098,0.000098701654,0.00012604654,0.00003214984,0.0025609557,0.00043889383,0.00039495333,0.0000603619,0.0049644257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071211136,0.000068849135,0.00009685282,0.0003311567,0.00026082917,0.0008733926,0.000020798292,0.00083775696,0.00053113146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023497469,0.000036462487,0.000011568768,0.000009665957,0.000011977916,0.000006679444,0.0009890968,0.0000045178317,0.0000020705272,0.53690225,0.46121818,0.0008051743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015113753,0.000015153865,0.00009614175,0.00013515684,0.00004503761,0.00007830243,0.00024112027,3.8791487e-7,0.0000066052266,0.050405424,0.94873357,0.00009196329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023371425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032706257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5696719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020548783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087404245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982127033","doi":"","title":"The Great Canadian Lawyer: A Manifesto, eh?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03381337132020174,"score_gpt":0.32592880943586666,"score_spread":0.2921154381156649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982127033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018817019,0.00045012758,0.0000046940963,0.10692492,0.0022591043,0.00020267739,0.000008625278,0.00007062557,0.8712622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416194,0.00006298004,0.00016651042,0.0074641975,0.0014801687,0.00003821845,0.000007065003,0.000011082875,0.04915037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866694,0.0002214158,0.00015807583,0.000113144415,0.00027296098,0.0005674824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986353,0.00027782924,0.000069575646,0.00027014563,0.00014652456,0.0006006105],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012757003,0.00008201623,0.00006609092,0.000042987296,0.002763285,0.00049258815,0.0003100243,0.00008833794,0.0033284656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083029625,0.00006614366,0.00003998934,0.00043335318,0.00021568532,0.0011658546,0.000017687573,0.00036772154,0.0031104703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017786172,0.000015944224,0.008080811,9.9453e-7,0.00000871393,9.041859e-7,0.0028451565,2.4388234e-7,0.000004550646,0.9029505,0.08485242,0.0012379584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005785153,0.0000047635417,0.0066176783,0.0000036781787,0.000009111186,0.0000030828567,0.002922799,6.481206e-7,0.000011347342,0.00195132,0.9883191,0.00009859248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7892523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.930282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9228024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028765388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012548952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983158694","doi":"10.1177/1743872119886235","title":"Law and Humanities: A Field Without a Canon","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Scholarship; Humanities; Discipline; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Law; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0355903174241701,"score_gpt":0.31738393941470394,"score_spread":0.2817936219905338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983158694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075697647,0.00060874,0.0000015313883,0.004841661,0.00026132297,0.00019959894,0.000002983828,0.00003583504,0.98647857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7371719,0.000116011055,0.000020728785,0.027776489,0.00025925136,0.000017799184,0.000003076735,0.0000041849275,0.23463055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994691,0.00010532119,0.00009076343,0.00009398812,0.00012372463,0.00011709791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995478,0.00020503905,0.000052855645,0.000093875635,0.00008415598,0.000016322623],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027000232,0.00006856619,0.00009650083,0.000012492709,0.0015401315,0.00077365513,0.000087757944,0.000052284555,0.00057243917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004225141,0.000043831886,0.000019476245,0.000047471094,0.0008070595,0.0005195021,0.000023173927,0.0001937096,0.000025724206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012515148,0.0000063854172,0.000055360775,0.0000090206895,0.000012162652,1.5640656e-7,0.13456474,2.7146855e-8,0.000004395274,0.86423874,0.0010529369,0.000043559405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000273427,0.00002280981,0.000014734273,0.00001341245,0.000016944137,0.00000200684,0.05247033,7.6662985e-7,0.00001508214,0.048358224,0.8987438,0.00006843015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038768303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09502552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8976909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011193865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006092796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985017477","doi":"","title":"When Can a Canadian Judge Change Her or His Decision","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.08216986121150839,"score_gpt":0.31386532348790624,"score_spread":0.23169546227639787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985017477","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19103834,0.000046292924,0.0005831161,0.6710993,0.0010900039,0.0005043726,0.00013720006,0.00007996694,0.13542141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9320379,0.00008145181,0.0025167987,0.0016878603,0.00021538018,9.4377367e-7,0.0000047267854,0.000006236011,0.0634487],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925584,0.00008357827,0.00007380346,0.00015238726,0.00022445843,0.00020990783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899924,0.00026565115,0.00009331445,0.00016040224,0.00022744821,0.00025396413],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031834748,0.000056199315,0.0000917789,0.00024113402,0.0005940164,0.000029454175,0.00029050515,0.00010313598,0.009704896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003727897,0.000051012346,0.000039021903,0.00050689327,0.00016518484,0.00072728004,0.000030885236,0.000086722066,0.00022764536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011666045,0.0001526982,0.017988633,0.000010387142,0.000047420766,0.000043425982,0.13419454,2.4206886e-7,0.000107414315,0.07191611,0.31052405,0.46489844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002681128,0.000025189274,0.019883946,0.000027648364,0.000011230894,6.6137125e-7,0.0109653,0.0000024618746,0.000003454367,0.001289539,0.9674342,0.00008821717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7652643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97289836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7409996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036520735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021171907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988676834","doi":"","title":"The Ethics of Educational Research","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Educational Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Plea; Ethical code; Educational research; Meta-ethics; Accountability; Research ethics; Social research; Nursing ethics; Law; Social science; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.3709408605226354,"score_gpt":0.5785291975150079,"score_spread":0.20758833699237245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988676834","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073872566,0.024222428,0.0000031268607,0.82550436,0.002357177,0.000113027374,0.000004422002,0.0000015275263,0.073921375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9208642,0.04098234,0.0007099085,0.0005913232,0.002975408,0.000022776447,0.0000030895046,0.000007898869,0.033843033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972456,0.0008505946,0.0005370412,0.00008665938,0.0010612395,0.00021884515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97045356,0.02142456,0.00044399354,0.00008690152,0.007506105,0.00008486845],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076107625,0.00005245577,0.00012704488,0.0001344806,0.0030338387,0.000223484,0.000388706,0.00006105432,0.0012185478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069011144,0.000047846857,0.00007113441,0.0009721501,0.0011869434,0.00054083177,0.00003441855,0.0009782884,0.00003315307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017825532,0.00033947048,0.010673816,0.000009710267,0.00012603743,8.360368e-7,0.019710947,0.0000043139275,0.000009648561,0.6181794,0.34503806,0.00588995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008761992,0.000025842945,0.042848248,0.0001063939,0.000012753575,0.000113263006,0.048844755,1.6831004e-7,0.0000048775637,0.092637986,0.8152665,0.000051621897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023834412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058768117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84699166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022280964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070171165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989159063","doi":"","title":"Teaching the common law in Quebec: reflections on the proliferation of separate, suppletive degree programs","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Degree (music); Law; Political science; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.07156044506488321,"score_gpt":0.3376798521883494,"score_spread":0.26611940712346616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989159063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072656344,0.000049028913,0.00007334656,0.19305591,0.0010831921,0.0016318318,0.000057597776,0.00010560315,0.7966778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805608,0.00012234274,0.00033839353,0.0012525294,0.0013772853,0.00052791176,0.0002450848,0.00006027472,0.015515382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943084,0.0017737953,0.001249881,0.00074151665,0.0012992875,0.00062713557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490863,0.0015867483,0.0013200252,0.0008813889,0.0010974285,0.0002057608],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00297555,0.00057941815,0.00055817346,0.00043925561,0.0035210485,0.00091619056,0.0010626488,0.0008434618,0.00023840343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009665318,0.0004118777,0.00028756046,0.00079125527,0.00033386,0.00095753686,0.00017305049,0.0027655617,0.000060899198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019376988,0.0006667702,0.00009072877,0.000042044016,0.00015683455,0.000008479859,0.029811293,0.000012378432,0.0001215166,0.9660238,0.001152966,0.0017193869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003920602,0.00018897772,0.0005601029,0.00042435594,0.00011304302,0.00006617423,0.0063756257,0.0000497846,0.00012889874,0.00840005,0.9828751,0.00042582577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015298743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17878243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011476838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020308383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989917148","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Legal System: An Introduction for Regulated Professions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal profession; Action (physics); Context (archaeology); Public law; Philosophy of law; Legal research; Geography; Physics","score_opus":0.023652325223906888,"score_gpt":0.3293184005324154,"score_spread":0.30566607530850853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989917148","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124422565,0.00007276179,0.00004522757,0.59199435,0.013380539,0.002381272,0.00003307235,0.0002843262,0.26738593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93856406,0.0000022337167,0.00027514243,0.00093550095,0.0017228366,0.00010778507,0.000048676866,0.000012000037,0.05833179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874103,0.00028855316,0.000200734,0.00020536692,0.0002308624,0.00033347812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986408,0.00016247632,0.00011245352,0.0003558936,0.00045655292,0.00027182148],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015487499,0.00007313887,0.000079962854,0.00005597152,0.0037391589,0.0007101382,0.0002613668,0.00011791248,0.00046211705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006823976,0.000058005175,0.00003458655,0.00044853258,0.000120273835,0.0012473774,0.000009473879,0.0003198513,0.00039664676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010176164,0.000014864863,0.00026854544,0.0000065494837,0.000008855025,1.448837e-7,0.0011467931,0.0000076053543,0.0000849977,0.9548133,0.04330444,0.00033375082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012367536,0.000022475713,0.0007104007,0.000008908426,0.000010347173,0.0000014317324,0.0109167015,0.00005684226,0.000041677442,0.0010295516,0.98698884,0.00008915385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58761656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93371767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95378375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004971044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002702873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994294823","doi":"10.7202/1068735ar","title":"The Paradox of Elite Law Schools in India—A comparison with Canadian Legal Education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Legal research; Socratic method; Internship; Empirical legal studies; Memorization; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics education; Psychology","score_opus":0.021171231588821792,"score_gpt":0.32466099179128294,"score_spread":0.30348976020246116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994294823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12469187,0.000096405114,0.00006838274,0.20330141,0.00048990495,0.00030195148,0.000024853218,0.000021468633,0.67100376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99347997,0.000056503115,0.00039029637,0.00475682,0.0003609797,0.000040168045,0.000033878856,0.0000072249873,0.00087417586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990726,0.000095953794,0.00027725985,0.00012944231,0.00025011244,0.00017463294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906826,0.00017407953,0.00017828005,0.00010226143,0.00029899995,0.00017809264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042360488,0.0000606475,0.000091919406,0.000099388155,0.00022641214,0.00021103026,0.00034979582,0.000053020693,0.00013410584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000717263,0.0000589204,0.000027121652,0.0004771486,0.000101607795,0.00048828765,0.0000078913745,0.0003471619,0.000040455947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025620215,0.000067814835,0.0253596,0.000005313191,0.000018035505,0.0000016133239,0.007722503,0.0000399416,0.000014801367,0.9617953,0.0020227681,0.002926738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001207812,0.000018071973,0.02334389,0.000052816846,0.000007818803,0.0000029207074,0.007017661,0.00022927567,0.000027677359,0.00289846,0.9661958,0.000084780775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6172301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8000231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9641731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005059137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005806134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995813127","doi":"10.1080/09612025.2019.1702791","title":"Cornelia Sorabji (1866–1954): a pioneer woman lawyer in Britain and India","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women s History Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Opposition (politics); Colonialism; British Empire; Context (archaeology); Chose; History; War of independence; Law; Ancient history; Empire; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.028808194587834214,"score_gpt":0.3195811958192114,"score_spread":0.29077300123137717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995813127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25947598,0.17719844,0.0000030835902,0.03280528,0.0020932814,0.0017288777,0.000006265882,0.00011460537,0.5265742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75815153,0.056644972,0.00023820743,0.055980105,0.00024610927,0.0003973346,0.000018570727,0.000036060454,0.12828709],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881524,0.00028293754,0.00026492242,0.00019974197,0.00020208536,0.00023508721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993642,0.00011137565,0.0001402618,0.00019477488,0.00008095342,0.000108450244],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001698406,0.00008529402,0.00022206233,0.000097770266,0.000099427154,0.000033563945,0.00013833157,0.00005872427,0.007021017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041161774,0.00008861018,0.000025979674,0.00044666868,0.00011220792,0.00049130275,0.000020519663,0.0002588674,0.0009210496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018812898,0.00033513244,0.027526448,0.0019274454,0.000032217544,0.00001148639,0.12569022,2.645527e-7,0.00007073725,0.25027496,0.5611824,0.032929882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012750307,0.000014048772,0.0050333263,0.00027602317,0.000006238649,0.0000013237892,0.0015770958,5.0436626e-7,1.11445864e-7,0.00023029525,0.9926156,0.00011797266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010173661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035725956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49867555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001348605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073929894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996465541","doi":"","title":"Making Continuous Improvement a Reality: Achieving High Performance in the Ottawa County, Michigan, Circuit and Probate Courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Probate; Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07607464022723298,"score_gpt":0.3136138013774729,"score_spread":0.23753916115023993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996465541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92881876,0.000038893846,0.00010032046,0.037023846,0.00016975825,0.000343061,0.000008960447,0.000021815145,0.033474553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774146,0.000052351385,0.0004127204,0.0006094731,0.0000751835,0.0000011914478,0.0000046528335,0.000003519577,0.0010994469],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990628,0.00017033325,0.00012416656,0.00015018473,0.00032595964,0.00016660299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925995,0.0001479273,0.00020413406,0.00013786589,0.00019798733,0.000052126437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018050043,0.000063657666,0.0001155516,0.000096083495,0.00043482558,0.0000853592,0.00026513485,0.00006275227,0.00003234934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001740158,0.000066059365,0.000017371769,0.00041007876,0.00019721044,0.0006622826,0.000052716474,0.00021696057,0.000006017737],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001217578,0.00064223853,0.131897,0.00014280049,0.000077230296,0.000031855267,0.4950642,0.00010849757,0.000484697,0.30849114,0.01095623,0.051982332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009957476,0.00014084556,0.23410112,0.00009031075,0.00004634513,0.000004815848,0.18687446,0.00022431754,0.000009172631,0.002340088,0.5749522,0.00022062319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011250757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016114192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56399596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008953662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006430017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99533343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997560070","doi":"10.52358/mm.vi2.82","title":"Formation continue obligatoire et modalités de la formation à distance destinée aux juristes","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Médiations et médiatisations","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Library science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.045804837477594736,"score_gpt":0.3814479054825421,"score_spread":0.33564306800494736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997560070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101150654,0.0019211707,0.10046606,0.3516919,0.0029671432,0.001978197,0.00087847165,0.00045239856,0.438494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9312391,0.001236287,0.009828967,0.005780834,0.00034861863,0.00037849278,0.00094553275,0.000056787736,0.050185338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994626,0.0025446906,0.0010538024,0.0004201296,0.00070782634,0.00064756477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99384826,0.0034946175,0.00095466996,0.0005721869,0.00085910753,0.00027112654],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033294852,0.00035874333,0.00033358115,0.00043062077,0.0015196312,0.0012981496,0.00040664055,0.00046235026,0.002557506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030411188,0.00044502597,0.00018991793,0.002447799,0.0004539948,0.010485277,0.00006517508,0.0010081625,0.001711521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007126032,0.0003724563,0.0061908113,0.00010821117,0.000041008356,8.7168576e-7,0.038107958,0.003082954,0.00022766157,0.9051234,0.041411612,0.005325946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078890205,0.00004937745,0.04093308,0.00017692155,0.00013358198,0.000021683365,0.009473709,0.016260372,0.00015453456,0.031636555,0.8998245,0.00054679683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044990857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043241736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8734868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012050874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043844944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998654919","doi":"","title":"Medically assisted suicide: Recent jurisprudence and the challenges for law reform.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Law reform; Parliament; Dignity; Political science; High Court; Assisted suicide; Economic Justice; Common law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09060180008442864,"score_gpt":0.3937852794660006,"score_spread":0.303183479381572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998654919","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.136885e-7,0.0016379533,0.000015510921,0.33578694,0.4574549,0.0009972423,0.000045017074,0.000045428584,0.20401622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013176677,0.0335149,0.0001116496,0.0015369015,0.93638587,0.0076805204,0.000052815663,0.00003052038,0.019369166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759674,0.0004068341,0.00034531538,0.00031425382,0.0009084712,0.00042841258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992062,0.0062273205,0.00038700795,0.00028529897,0.00086016074,0.0001782588],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065492513,0.00014727902,0.0002496658,0.0000537998,0.00081362494,0.00030944095,0.00049475813,0.0005519023,0.000071714865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023831328,0.00008471481,0.000062687686,0.0001823649,0.0010028251,0.0004142601,0.000056434357,0.00059939135,0.0000111600075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056778306,0.000018378467,2.838755e-7,0.000016095695,0.00002947844,1.8088805e-7,0.0013081772,9.412979e-10,3.2401772e-8,0.2805406,0.5751768,0.14285323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007023654,0.000006859429,0.0001794452,0.000025434552,0.00005333038,2.733973e-7,0.0006308288,7.958432e-8,8.015252e-7,0.008300809,0.98996526,0.00013453767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033513096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013053629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47893098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003902306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012405254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98439133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998893145","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v9n2p70","title":"A Comparative Study on the Legal Education Model in Saudi Arabia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Apprenticeship; Legal education; Law; Political science; Kingdom; Administration (probate law); Legal history; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.11535626037732363,"score_gpt":0.46831146454567035,"score_spread":0.3529552041683467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998893145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51480204,0.00007776912,0.000064523265,0.41231993,0.0035725837,0.00029418195,0.000002150499,0.000009867625,0.06885698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98355937,0.00001438576,0.00023417978,0.0111493915,0.0017031688,0.000032094926,0.000004698228,0.000006563326,0.0032961695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825907,0.00033617808,0.000458718,0.00012681843,0.0007153738,0.00010386532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997823,0.00027318497,0.0004978343,0.00009238075,0.0012184546,0.00009514108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066527264,0.000089625064,0.00012629695,0.00021836997,0.00014875035,0.0002919569,0.0005338639,0.00004009561,0.000520254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000511861,0.00007109124,0.000054227494,0.0005043317,0.00006428049,0.0009987667,0.000017475842,0.00049367046,0.00006534105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023888073,0.0050955554,0.012236041,0.000002986269,0.00012581602,0.0000026979453,0.17729646,0.0012125602,0.00025600978,0.6032395,0.19537963,0.004913885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006479452,0.000251178,0.11854958,0.00008783679,0.00004393235,0.00000686007,0.115971595,0.00026278984,0.000097618555,0.01204733,0.75180095,0.00023238617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069743197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017459219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5911921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035265542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046062204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8171237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999836414","doi":"10.11575/prism/32471","title":"Juror Stress Debriefing: A Review of the Literature and an Evaluation of a Yukon Program","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debriefing; Psychology; Stress (linguistics); Applied psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3149855873354872,"score_gpt":0.5791632817035828,"score_spread":0.2641776943680956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999836414","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003927103,0.96580434,8.755397e-8,0.0014555086,0.000117285446,0.0029262695,0.000051585466,7.956423e-7,0.029604867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000031799038,0.99821776,0.00071365776,0.000072927614,0.000067784495,0.00016129565,0.00010319788,0.000006566548,0.00062503107],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971687,0.0016632768,0.0004251423,0.00018565658,0.00047263654,0.00008454509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788535,0.00018907113,0.00081936107,0.0003027461,0.00076352083,0.000039974577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025968216,0.00010354581,0.00044067553,0.00004859839,0.00020004211,0.00018012046,0.00047846834,0.00012918765,0.000637762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023893618,0.00006727879,0.00008723903,0.0010658036,0.00015515162,0.00050800125,0.0000641181,0.00026407503,0.000004553775],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.8876864e-7,0.000109786895,0.0000019388967,0.0037863036,0.000018251778,9.746252e-8,0.0052394485,1.4150658e-8,2.3132658e-8,0.00024178537,0.0008956446,0.98970604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004332422,0.000017449012,0.000011219877,0.05005123,0.00037655976,0.0000039481824,0.00020299599,6.5762015e-7,5.974325e-7,0.000026113767,0.9491981,0.00006776775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030909057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039167266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98963827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041767875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039899126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70779335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001318696","doi":"","title":"Court of Appeal for Ontario","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Alphascript Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0657621426225248,"score_gpt":0.3413164617336619,"score_spread":0.27555431911113715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001318696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005160941,0.000034830602,0.00017096456,0.015278217,0.006126834,0.0006995799,0.000080127604,0.000093697374,0.97746414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002531513,0.000002221839,0.002107102,0.001801295,0.001973303,0.00008919164,0.00029183013,0.00004522999,0.9911583],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979497,0.00007465713,0.0005644378,0.00034122771,0.0006882702,0.00038169793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658334,0.00058433873,0.000823777,0.000433396,0.0014012551,0.00017387631],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024601526,0.00020876367,0.00034491136,0.00028591158,0.0006149275,0.002082639,0.000833373,0.0008535775,0.0008924487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028738342,0.00022721996,0.00019833368,0.00007959348,0.0003818109,0.0019610394,0.00005972611,0.0019898354,0.00001831605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007668989,0.000021613001,0.00001232336,0.000020061689,0.000039677303,3.8417778e-7,0.011873612,3.0609545e-8,0.000017128425,0.4256687,0.5588837,0.0034550838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023549292,0.000027544571,0.0000146824705,0.00005122388,0.000078593555,0.0000012744252,0.001006837,6.261815e-7,0.00002030592,0.04758078,0.9507599,0.00022274934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15928191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5726936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41341168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008391344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02126177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002787460","doi":"10.17635/lancaster/thesis/826","title":"A Bernsteinian analysis of the interplay between legal knowledge and the legal professional in university law schools in Yorkshire and Alberta","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University of Lancaster","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Legal research; Legal education; Legal profession; Law; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Legal history; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.01632383217721077,"score_gpt":0.3216088700466389,"score_spread":0.3052850378694281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002787460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8617056,0.000040687406,0.0000018440096,0.01571033,0.00014717986,0.00024665557,0.000034981644,0.0000030150375,0.1221097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97373056,0.000023193059,0.000021053544,0.00006692773,0.000021859409,1.18218544e-7,0.00005414014,0.0000028082466,0.026079345],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899465,0.000451778,0.0001455419,0.00016176356,0.00015269034,0.00009355656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990816,0.00042763384,0.00023924657,0.00010818437,0.000102788836,0.000040555635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035648228,0.000081017555,0.0002761421,0.00022752273,0.00023016865,0.000031428455,0.00027447793,0.00014774354,0.000098456505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012873276,0.00006615568,0.00007310748,0.0010848705,0.00032155885,0.00039860807,0.00007662957,0.00052373606,0.0000017969406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007262584,0.00012318838,0.32787517,0.000105366715,0.00050371233,0.0000068295076,0.38014707,0.0000019196557,0.000009570433,0.28831083,0.0010285022,0.0011615816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011490339,0.000014093349,0.47362813,0.00023012256,0.0005658496,2.3919904e-7,0.21691848,0.00007807489,0.0000043469313,0.00009449937,0.30718008,0.00013705075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089585036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6664853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5769003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000675435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005255587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9164775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004382415","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i1.5968","title":"Access to Legal Education","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.033139406781002884,"score_gpt":0.3528028254099387,"score_spread":0.31966341862893577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004382415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051001683,0.0017242841,0.000099810866,0.08171704,0.0009879975,0.000507683,0.0000052182204,0.000056560213,0.90980124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65471786,0.15646894,0.006026546,0.039465833,0.0019347402,0.000005590533,0.00008719409,0.00003410389,0.14125915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992713,0.0001432814,0.00013266139,0.00013422518,0.00020545171,0.00011313251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928355,0.000065625565,0.00009441751,0.00016832654,0.00027328462,0.00011480856],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043734058,0.0000564146,0.00013061333,0.000044036937,0.0003899059,0.000048077483,0.00038254057,0.000042232015,0.01169084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083151645,0.000067848276,0.000052912204,0.00075921713,0.000083564264,0.0009815376,0.0000151895865,0.00011102975,0.00055880524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012319914,0.0001562274,0.00012289599,0.00019078708,0.000012447072,4.5076882e-7,0.0026573713,0.000005876013,0.000008358981,0.8784985,0.082977705,0.035357047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000388104,0.00000942564,0.00007797588,0.00034670197,0.000033258137,2.6839567e-7,0.00026492184,4.4618105e-7,0.000010138027,0.00024664824,0.99889505,0.000076352386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029202128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031011128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91591734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082569495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083540566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98921263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004626288","doi":"10.3968/11328","title":"A Study of the Supply-side Reform of Clinical Legal Education: From the Perspective of Fostering Outstanding Legal Talents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thriving; Legal education; Perspective (graphical); Curriculum; Engineering ethics; Supply side; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Business; Social science; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12845326987427225,"score_gpt":0.5026279948899329,"score_spread":0.3741747250156607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004626288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9060665,0.00014812933,0.0000010199351,0.010788573,0.0006474943,0.0005796402,0.000018244944,0.000011689059,0.081738725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980882,0.00005571701,0.00015024023,0.00012792007,0.000111083595,0.000021727634,0.000017825296,0.000006105028,0.0014211772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794036,0.0006585663,0.0007295672,0.00015352124,0.0004069835,0.00011100947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588907,0.00065536454,0.00097183,0.000899113,0.0015547008,0.000029901801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014272624,0.00008666097,0.00020919488,0.000028352524,0.00061776093,0.0002057806,0.0010445246,0.000077186116,0.00010593804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014322485,0.000052482734,0.0001176159,0.0005273806,0.0007110858,0.001520042,0.00030528536,0.0004448183,0.0000071964496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014997923,0.0013769988,0.41232967,0.000017445298,0.00015191024,5.4573928e-8,0.22655465,0.000020015153,0.0013864368,0.35319898,0.0006174853,0.0041963826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004538498,0.00006996183,0.42723596,0.00008398164,0.000041245425,6.917507e-7,0.5490408,0.000007937544,0.0004637455,0.0010737847,0.021449294,0.00007873459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.075441636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009101212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3521252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022882165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078080496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9307151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005580030","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Michel Proulx and David Layton,","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01978743567028208,"score_gpt":0.3477006087598151,"score_spread":0.32791317308953305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005580030","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00531657,0.6214823,0.00029141255,0.34681967,0.00035276802,0.00029195275,9.841103e-7,0.000046896555,0.02539744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044795945,0.7973069,0.000102161364,0.045317896,0.00065274246,0.00001183708,0.0000027887631,0.000011683322,0.111798055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845004,0.00017291507,0.00019417303,0.00010197588,0.0002462066,0.0008346952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994359,0.00006448721,0.00014792729,0.00008003398,0.00018583244,0.00008583382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020385976,0.00006513171,0.00009448706,0.000054085533,0.00097524846,0.000067218076,0.00014179933,0.0000449467,0.0005009094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059593463,0.000058964302,0.000034435627,0.00029432875,0.00010601009,0.000775889,0.000010657132,0.0015497989,0.00006512131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008369974,0.000075801785,0.00073533657,0.000015430802,0.000045429002,0.0000027713872,0.0074328994,1.4970215e-7,0.000027698543,0.14468439,0.83834654,0.008625197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011165571,0.000034190183,0.00023575552,0.000031470783,0.000016843884,0.00027846114,0.0024229088,5.038865e-7,0.000004537183,0.007655656,0.9891309,0.00007709397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004208342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009945198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30150178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003246009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076057008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99802023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008417484","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v13n1p143","title":"Transformation of Legal Education in Indonesia Based on Social Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Legal education; Legal profession; Curriculum; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Legal psychology; Political science; Legal process; Empowerment; Economic Justice; Law; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04260177958225985,"score_gpt":0.3832755048507342,"score_spread":0.34067372526847434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008417484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51311445,0.000029625975,0.00034216832,0.30163136,0.00049861474,0.0000992796,0.0000066060206,0.0000040558516,0.18427381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929978,0.000010884591,0.00016787199,0.0063851653,0.00039809084,4.3334762e-7,0.0000012846378,0.0000019958466,0.000036462156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994079,0.00008452626,0.00024111189,0.000026963193,0.00017366122,0.00006585592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994419,0.000098585704,0.00018000064,0.000015831482,0.0002030425,0.000060633258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033158183,0.000028923763,0.00007232482,0.000067467954,0.00012315293,0.000052181767,0.000045741934,0.000035872505,0.000028523173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016827432,0.000027738379,0.000022396096,0.00017779104,0.00006424396,0.000426807,0.0000013347089,0.00017011414,7.7100947e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016534994,0.00009450614,0.00017938136,0.000025719002,0.0000021788733,2.907615e-7,0.01141901,0.000015289475,0.000043397125,0.9859994,0.0010624602,0.0011418184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009317908,0.00021384236,0.016371112,0.000060998216,0.000087615634,0.0000031553882,0.035899352,0.00047152163,0.00032025206,0.005177273,0.9403402,0.00012285206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008507457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001227596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98082215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003688059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013085613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23213315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008536437","doi":"","title":"Practising As a Lawyer in a Partnership and Multidisciplinary Practice in Québec: Progress and Prospects (L’exercice de la profession d’avocat en société et en multidisciplinarité au Québec : bilan et perspectives)","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Negotiation; Political science; Legal profession; Sociology; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01950088354013265,"score_gpt":0.4427060104134434,"score_spread":0.42320512687331074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008536437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59295285,0.011234789,0.000020856169,0.3852261,0.00021341997,0.00055388454,0.0000014453639,0.000018861778,0.009777786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790536,0.011840994,0.00090568257,0.00026804156,0.00040990888,0.00009293532,0.0000021691412,0.000046235695,0.0073804306],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913528,0.0051844465,0.00054074964,0.00057081576,0.00047585383,0.0018753483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936165,0.004513888,0.0010643657,0.00029681352,0.0002658027,0.00024258584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0199462,0.0003340591,0.00036607287,0.00026656137,0.0023548338,0.0011245122,0.00041639456,0.00044282083,0.000025175685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013096733,0.0003236694,0.00006757557,0.00043056053,0.0010550994,0.005877145,0.00027766856,0.007808698,0.000011665025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003038317,0.0011237998,0.17616235,0.000046441277,0.00007222467,0.00005296021,0.5318907,0.000006873335,0.000050433166,0.2647834,0.000026955791,0.025480056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020407569,0.00036710195,0.23648803,0.00062929955,0.00011560447,0.0010027718,0.7072937,0.00021453077,0.000011541363,0.034262758,0.017121682,0.00045222804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60238093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9124036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38610074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007717794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07150146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008604145","doi":"10.7202/1068151ar","title":"Kenneth Einar Himma, \"Morality and the Nature of Law.\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11282342903362652,"score_gpt":0.4203342383472259,"score_spread":0.30751080931359936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008604145","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030677504,0.08139698,9.8274e-7,0.7313539,0.0000750207,0.000293003,0.0000032120909,0.000008589279,0.18656154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8921324,0.051986523,0.0000971488,0.055545263,0.0001895334,0.000017817503,0.0000025678607,0.0000026427565,0.000026126918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990343,0.00042894567,0.0002169071,0.00009680538,0.00015379932,0.00006927612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993485,0.0002839638,0.00013010304,0.00010872562,0.00008831201,0.000040381146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011351351,0.000046670728,0.00017019114,0.0000102129015,0.00011139912,0.000022372722,0.00015685556,0.0000451102,0.00018308102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015834564,0.00003167361,0.00003661723,0.00048380785,0.00031953788,0.0002104856,0.000021603963,0.0003752304,0.000015873085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060909115,0.000014781949,0.00011274776,0.00034177446,0.0000040556365,2.5591538e-7,0.0022897518,6.48117e-8,8.6110157e-7,0.9937165,0.0026009372,0.00091220747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014432146,0.000006876451,0.00022498526,0.00026673582,0.00001890206,2.708135e-7,0.00009348131,0.0000016494018,0.0000017468217,0.064188644,0.9350094,0.00004299651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008719295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009257045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93240845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010800298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106270905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20046088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008931395","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3537883","title":"Banking on the Lawyers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Accounting; Business; Face (sociological concept); Risk management; Principal (computer security); Value (mathematics); Independence (probability theory); Quality (philosophy); Bank regulation; Financial crisis; Public relations; Finance; Political science; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.049122372740545546,"score_gpt":0.34669967848754984,"score_spread":0.2975773057470043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008931395","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021505449,0.000119336604,0.0006168432,0.79792947,0.00026597411,0.00006514116,2.6583385e-7,0.000026250196,0.17947125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98336285,0.00046421925,0.000016097134,0.01337641,0.0009069009,0.0000020059365,3.4888836e-7,0.0000049224714,0.001866254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986854,0.00019649597,0.00009902488,0.00006457724,0.00024846342,0.0007060392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995238,0.00020900602,0.0000865426,0.00005007409,0.00007378519,0.00005676776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019691077,0.00004105372,0.000038238573,0.000022390615,0.0010253186,0.00019266055,0.00022994065,0.000026592808,0.0007301011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010554907,0.000028662442,0.000036298512,0.00037901907,0.000054523105,0.0002633237,0.000006748479,0.0021263028,0.00021175158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005895083,0.00000969673,0.00011454028,1.784554e-7,0.000015578587,2.153077e-7,0.006913665,0.0000046103028,0.000016512833,0.9839032,0.0043502855,0.0046656076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070666545,0.00005245941,0.000057283047,0.0000025576896,0.0000069580306,0.0000049051896,0.0402522,0.000009919548,0.000012525321,0.18662307,0.77285665,0.000050773146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000330488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011444326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9618574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003140602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004964687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9237846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010815349","doi":"","title":"Removing a \"Section 96\" Judge:An Historical Case Study","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Legal history; International law; Political science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.059065879564704014,"score_gpt":0.37600146429289255,"score_spread":0.31693558472818856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010815349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81215495,0.00003376916,0.000082618586,0.011795102,0.0022097745,0.00015278882,8.541565e-7,0.00009094649,0.17347921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878299,0.000022634851,0.00047433737,0.00097376155,0.0029853682,0.0000056413305,0.0000010799856,0.000012679198,0.007694594],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982841,0.00057990546,0.0003133701,0.00015646924,0.000414824,0.00025134356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911743,0.00011373902,0.00014032023,0.00015716476,0.0002299703,0.00024138621],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017037811,0.00008291537,0.000105166924,0.000084486834,0.0036114878,0.0006111084,0.00016419454,0.00007577264,0.0046967138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023517842,0.00008141483,0.00004723809,0.0005067828,0.00005906322,0.0016998851,0.000008386771,0.00084297935,0.000087551816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014524422,0.005172125,0.010583873,0.0000067490096,0.00012478624,0.00684223,0.5395788,0.0001486684,0.00010951691,0.05152607,0.05667906,0.32908285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002670531,0.00013090196,0.00037758707,0.0000033288109,0.00002965946,0.0033236514,0.039373424,0.000016459715,0.0000016548702,0.0005224026,0.9558341,0.00011980666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12438677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11000156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.899155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061282987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004613464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010912969","doi":"10.1093/jpo/joaa006","title":"Inside the ‘Red Circle’: the production of China’s corporate legal elite","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Professions and Organization","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Production (economics); China; Globalization; Beijing; Political science; Work (physics); Economics; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04754597601569579,"score_gpt":0.3334801974070471,"score_spread":0.28593422139135133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010912969","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42368725,0.00008620917,0.00064007513,0.5738352,0.0008248866,0.00016033716,6.8607375e-7,0.000008036624,0.0007573221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973892,0.0002884657,0.00016321373,0.001211989,0.00055259996,7.614221e-7,0.0000016692278,0.000005426578,0.00038665463],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990664,0.00031148133,0.00028661813,0.000053896558,0.0002210268,0.00006057861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982106,0.000093302006,0.0007796138,0.000067577996,0.00080275326,0.00004613793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086362095,0.000038589194,0.000073196345,0.00003731989,0.00076036516,0.00008044719,0.00012291218,0.00003720097,0.0001093629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039402586,0.000021764565,0.000016333392,0.001113705,0.000113919865,0.00064752996,0.000019999794,0.00029448324,0.000002470022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001385911,0.0004273949,0.07746847,0.000082495804,0.0001461482,0.0000037191567,0.47296563,0.00021571986,0.04410345,0.24671964,0.12715891,0.030569827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039429235,0.00013096022,0.61792684,0.00016092337,0.0001510751,0.000031923646,0.10278125,0.000060711238,0.003409964,0.0046647284,0.27012634,0.00016097899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011215695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052285857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.573702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000186788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006944852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5848191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011341383","doi":"","title":"Reconceptualizing Professional Responsibility:Incorporating Equality","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.11993809460788485,"score_gpt":0.4005033235033196,"score_spread":0.2805652288954347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011341383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10792307,0.0001614921,0.00043584415,0.10970748,0.004235475,0.00022812762,0.000009387423,0.00014390057,0.7771552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97954774,0.00002791356,0.0040437416,0.00373326,0.0014740794,0.0000068425675,0.0000032406801,0.000011958076,0.011151226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971381,0.0013099817,0.0004913504,0.00017195923,0.00057210156,0.00031649627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981347,0.0006056858,0.0004277364,0.00017619743,0.00043930896,0.00021637401],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045476365,0.00009245052,0.00012717905,0.00007291752,0.0035922225,0.00048906595,0.00025622666,0.000107984575,0.0073818313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023658904,0.00008611785,0.000069406226,0.00052158,0.00034561343,0.0016084787,0.000033461336,0.0010545683,0.00023967198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013837461,0.00018979193,0.0029557217,0.0000041614126,0.000015362144,0.000009130591,0.04592153,0.00000436771,0.0000918573,0.92018723,0.020919658,0.009687328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021378892,0.000019388552,0.00070213934,0.000031160285,0.000009499737,0.000036344358,0.018730307,0.000030385852,0.000042042164,0.025033144,0.9549979,0.0001538788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019800223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005239719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9340783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016431088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049809355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012108012","doi":"","title":"The Best Things in Law are Free?:Towards Quality Free Public Accessto Primary Legal Materials in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Quality (philosophy); Legal history; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04655171573101667,"score_gpt":0.338016501545715,"score_spread":0.2914647858146983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012108012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4091873,0.00012792404,0.0000022430884,0.26130322,0.0013214017,0.00016588107,0.000058833793,0.000019773932,0.32781345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834214,0.00021572913,0.0001198296,0.014199572,0.00062733586,0.000016488704,0.000009049552,0.0000143948455,0.0013761934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665356,0.0010246544,0.0007379045,0.000181351,0.00085612223,0.0005464061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984182,0.00039200942,0.0003840702,0.00038222427,0.0002396709,0.0001838367],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044003925,0.00013256862,0.00022531893,0.00006412354,0.0019856687,0.0020940322,0.0012783546,0.00009842489,0.0021885638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010980824,0.00010666429,0.00003809804,0.0006817357,0.00032291183,0.0033725433,0.00008325536,0.0010151654,0.000022427217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075185235,0.0002366829,0.0062175626,0.000015266258,0.000027935479,0.00008781688,0.01053163,0.000013868981,0.00007936546,0.9429009,0.02903319,0.010780579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044687468,0.000008135344,0.01684744,0.00002858443,0.0000052279966,0.00002026072,0.010634987,8.1797464e-7,0.000046491117,0.009651117,0.9621429,0.000167202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99563587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99939644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011977106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071066623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012153310","doi":"","title":"Canadian Graduate Legal Education: Past, Present and Future","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.02614164991244955,"score_gpt":0.322737240031135,"score_spread":0.29659559011868547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012153310","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036820028,0.00027182512,0.000006246123,0.59659094,0.0016684294,0.00024684385,0.000009011988,0.000053239783,0.36433342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955307,0.00012354083,0.0011798951,0.012643433,0.0113725485,0.00006318797,0.000028670174,0.000014704378,0.019267023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898505,0.000094075396,0.00016228741,0.00019895898,0.0002663567,0.00029326644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989048,0.000037881167,0.00006672008,0.00019039452,0.00024156242,0.00055859826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036231495,0.000092439244,0.000081685896,0.000085509084,0.0010883148,0.0005687257,0.00017014623,0.00008840409,0.0008732075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007862684,0.00009582466,0.000026776022,0.0004728779,0.00013649458,0.0011380687,0.000014457483,0.00036776264,0.00030762123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022010754,0.00005339452,0.00047975313,0.000005112362,0.000009841773,0.0000021601359,0.0034965915,0.000002957164,0.000004603309,0.92976564,0.06315657,0.0030211494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012347216,0.000009882693,0.003131612,0.000009765948,0.000009479509,0.000005561508,0.0069043003,2.7358695e-7,0.00001713191,0.010919032,0.9787469,0.00012260536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83195525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74568224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9188466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036960625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006241278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012459786","doi":"","title":"Breach of Contract?: The New Economy, Access to Justice and theEthical Responsibilities of the Legal Profession","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Economic Justice; Law; Business; Breach of contract; Professional responsibility; Legal service; Political science; Damages","score_opus":0.06586348626266146,"score_gpt":0.38859037400642776,"score_spread":0.3227268877437663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012459786","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12231628,0.0001953182,0.000095181116,0.73267716,0.0008440967,0.00029560452,0.0000064484925,0.000009422674,0.14356047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897238,0.000059696664,0.00017766823,0.006949513,0.00037757296,0.0000024713909,1.8302349e-7,0.000004809483,0.002704279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849814,0.0006716443,0.00033523937,0.00008083133,0.0002615964,0.00015255358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981059,0.0010073484,0.000343459,0.0001692336,0.00026914597,0.00010490215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002091386,0.00005773201,0.00011711791,0.000036485995,0.00122055,0.0003217414,0.00042879657,0.00006191307,0.00057590986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001625674,0.000032422882,0.000043295928,0.00028939248,0.00038087086,0.0008211872,0.00007201461,0.00065601536,0.0000035190924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049152994,0.00009121985,0.0006340616,0.000015479603,0.000020669073,5.184062e-7,0.0914943,0.00001014299,0.0001128845,0.8632845,0.03718162,0.00710545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029464028,0.000065798464,0.0072508943,0.00007724543,0.00005887024,0.000039675244,0.028366221,0.000021649581,0.00025362635,0.013735931,0.9497489,0.00008659471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008534638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009563113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91256726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036008187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007341327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012536637","doi":"","title":"Canadian Law Teachers in the 1930s: \"When the World was TurnedUpside Down\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal education","score_opus":0.030949882436189496,"score_gpt":0.332850534060498,"score_spread":0.3019006516243085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012536637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01220781,0.00007273133,0.000006533824,0.42537585,0.00065528246,0.00013126366,0.000003462249,0.000013201249,0.56153387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528639,0.000022960698,0.00026450623,0.04270627,0.0010595921,0.000011538106,0.0000032841176,0.000009623286,0.003058377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825335,0.00048010392,0.0002718016,0.00010946474,0.00044408982,0.0004412016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901915,0.0003152849,0.00013971057,0.00020907707,0.00011571649,0.00020106538],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030134185,0.000094021365,0.00008656064,0.00010968322,0.0031891633,0.0011621009,0.0006948298,0.000063612875,0.0010037714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003217951,0.00005720468,0.000060150764,0.0007405083,0.00035656613,0.00081846956,0.000013331312,0.001489856,0.00013756438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024385965,0.000036997215,0.00040011897,4.331281e-7,0.000011074646,0.000021478936,0.120120876,0.00006615755,0.0000027529384,0.85980076,0.018796679,0.000740249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018096798,0.000007652381,0.0010271176,0.000012544994,0.000011866576,0.00004457829,0.02982789,5.655439e-7,0.00000598114,0.050080474,0.9187168,0.0000835511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93153906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99811244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94065607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056593574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023538633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012620828","doi":"","title":"PROTECTING THE PUBLIC INTEREST:: LAW SOCIETY DECISION-MAKING AFTER TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Public interest; Law; Public law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03166196483596456,"score_gpt":0.3385246526296871,"score_spread":0.30686268779372255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012620828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8923298,0.00017736082,0.0039278227,0.0895062,0.0007681095,0.00031197042,0.0000011041719,0.00004661225,0.0129310265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956273,0.00025002594,0.000115426774,0.0008716699,0.00031074017,0.0000018748411,3.2187705e-7,0.0000073344067,0.0028153171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979235,0.0005427156,0.00015962588,0.00013291735,0.00027653863,0.0009647055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869734,0.0007038829,0.0002009778,0.0001494743,0.00019405794,0.000054238204],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006146619,0.0000754437,0.00007905734,0.00003864605,0.0019377092,0.00045424147,0.00041493628,0.000075193435,0.00035753354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048609407,0.000058824604,0.000115813906,0.00051671575,0.00011640848,0.0012965035,0.000056162437,0.004057493,0.00013031511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047129706,0.00005289875,0.008661634,0.000001965395,0.00007093041,9.799386e-7,0.008349375,0.0000012898449,0.000007216715,0.96425134,0.00015478669,0.01840043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034019488,0.000064890584,0.0015526508,0.000039687486,0.000022852879,0.0000637449,0.113401026,0.00001417146,0.000002624215,0.16076118,0.72357017,0.00016681435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040568277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04080116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80349016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011573506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005068219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013037630","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1376","title":"A Snapshot of the Law in the Streets: Reflections of a Former Parkdale Academic Director","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto","keywords":"Legal education; Sociology; Experiential learning; Law; Reflection (computer programming); Context (archaeology); Snapshot (computer storage); Political science; History","score_opus":0.12523979684065978,"score_gpt":0.4591753507229872,"score_spread":0.33393555388232743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013037630","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3176078,0.00007698344,0.0000035858147,0.47462842,0.00016303612,0.0001134367,0.000013701883,0.0000023000684,0.20739074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98896074,0.000071237686,0.000024665042,0.009909444,0.00097164063,0.0000014786124,3.2439453e-7,0.0000022501565,0.00005824558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990628,0.0002680016,0.00030511105,0.000034808745,0.00023778643,0.00009154151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992291,0.00018509311,0.00037944273,0.00003451526,0.00013942977,0.00003245794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006337129,0.000037250975,0.00011371041,0.00003383338,0.00036902263,0.000028278175,0.00018809055,0.00006534217,0.00004152374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046239243,0.000022965143,0.00007113257,0.00054611376,0.00035069344,0.00030883923,0.000013351209,0.0004218817,3.0057973e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000142525105,0.000035829093,0.000372812,0.0000066159123,0.000012751351,1.15128415e-7,0.17113586,4.4860641e-7,0.00045194142,0.8254085,0.0023362932,0.00022457015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003476011,0.00007277227,0.0069156014,0.000022895665,0.000041451505,0.000003304603,0.053093616,0.0000012151351,0.00027028823,0.021776753,0.9173937,0.00006080729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014999149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064958343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9150574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032443586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062575086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99156004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013073302","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1382","title":"Reflecting on Clinical Legal Education at the Indigenous Community Legal Clinic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal education; Political science; Legal research; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.323329263932597,"score_gpt":0.5754932380771438,"score_spread":0.25216397414454683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013073302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49443308,0.000030865376,0.0000029266316,0.31159374,0.0005762393,0.00007635552,0.0000023271398,0.0000089473015,0.19327554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9232698,0.00007975726,0.000042578577,0.06652008,0.008180928,0.0000012796464,0.0000017235938,0.0000064782653,0.0018973697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974727,0.0015036779,0.00051582156,0.000063523476,0.00028366278,0.00016058328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981254,0.0007657806,0.0006090803,0.00007030027,0.0002906744,0.0001388143],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029991886,0.000067003166,0.00016563776,0.00004368496,0.0035573712,0.0002901613,0.00023003288,0.00011279698,0.00009145135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021672968,0.000051310893,0.00011454762,0.00030574593,0.00040154287,0.0005107521,0.00003873329,0.001452249,0.000031211388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013019089,0.00035897878,0.0007539428,0.000008304521,0.0000557,0.0000014166462,0.2446212,3.9167e-7,0.000025242722,0.69989043,0.03320353,0.020950656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020097468,0.00023493222,0.002950628,0.000006515027,0.00002536859,0.0000074942454,0.029522695,2.1936678e-7,0.0000067933297,0.0022314347,0.96475154,0.00006141932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028435044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047174348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.931548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015979908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003615087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99773985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W301312037","doi":"","title":"Book Review: In Search of ‘Bora’s Head’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Wonder; History; Art history; Psychology","score_opus":0.028167655594228957,"score_gpt":0.41497918174206255,"score_spread":0.3868115261478336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W301312037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059077833,0.31531772,0.00024492975,0.60340863,0.00021069779,0.00025310036,7.093654e-7,0.00001719976,0.07463924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5759931,0.3836057,0.00005658796,0.02120459,0.00029655948,0.0000023504126,0.0000017890344,0.0000052420323,0.018834073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982892,0.00026024602,0.00025868716,0.00006946507,0.00029995493,0.0008224185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949235,0.00006480813,0.00011547577,0.00007851754,0.00020079588,0.000048038153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043504676,0.000044566896,0.00010390804,0.00011752518,0.00017474056,0.00003348363,0.00018628589,0.00003709228,0.0006347058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049110665,0.00004211317,0.000039560273,0.000665995,0.000047095695,0.00053325185,0.0000040651003,0.0016743154,0.000028789686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017920247,0.00021382932,0.00055876776,0.000013687717,0.000016091113,0.000001217865,0.004622156,0.0000038937387,0.000083234445,0.84488004,0.09582968,0.053759463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015744231,0.00009979348,0.00085867965,0.00010523685,0.000007049185,0.000015778138,0.003286053,0.0000014415078,0.000017265536,0.03664992,0.95873964,0.00006173093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011714135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033697446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8629099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005654763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010706332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013151357","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1381","title":"Clinical Legal Education on the Ground: A Conversation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Communication","score_opus":0.13225084064314827,"score_gpt":0.4753807570936605,"score_spread":0.3431299164505123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013151357","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12552743,0.000009294193,0.000015761007,0.7626596,0.0004410279,0.000057201498,0.000001003982,0.000005304647,0.111283384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90115035,0.000046806734,0.000047567893,0.090518445,0.007923812,9.601355e-7,6.344559e-7,0.000002818187,0.00030863108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990431,0.0003524437,0.00026420847,0.00004753635,0.00021512025,0.000077594166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990741,0.00026997103,0.00030704937,0.00002702456,0.00023883018,0.00008304753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009717381,0.000038048558,0.000086519925,0.000030372681,0.000590117,0.00020975502,0.00009792908,0.00005992891,0.000065478845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010583014,0.00002789859,0.000061708364,0.00018817326,0.00023231645,0.00048702158,0.000007181474,0.00035492738,0.000015030538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019385323,0.0000517527,0.000067258414,0.0000016185718,0.0000116973415,1.9791344e-7,0.046456903,6.5828644e-8,0.000005746345,0.93113726,0.016429752,0.005818357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013636998,0.000067231675,0.0018017004,0.0000036218894,0.000014140326,0.0000013676818,0.021441182,0.0000018222803,0.00000323264,0.0104485955,0.966045,0.000035686233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005426227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018035324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054281958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021167006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8202868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013193154","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1375","title":"Just Clinics: A Humble Manifesto","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Legal service; Accountability; Legal profession; Manifesto; Inequality; Sociology; Intersection (aeronautics); Public relations; Construct (python library); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.15698979658348106,"score_gpt":0.4787690945841877,"score_spread":0.32177929800070665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013193154","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05677922,0.000051887742,0.000030318954,0.62906015,0.00031148444,0.00004702926,0.0000031568554,0.0000123438895,0.3137044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95389956,0.00009599624,0.000167088,0.03752125,0.0076656947,4.2431884e-7,3.8861302e-7,0.000004208292,0.00064538716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928164,0.00011810098,0.00024750613,0.000045630757,0.0001934064,0.000113681665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993081,0.000082413484,0.00025349014,0.00002106165,0.00020975266,0.00012518522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049891055,0.000039883158,0.000110433044,0.000036671914,0.0006035178,0.00015785903,0.000101254016,0.00006441177,0.00011830475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048690132,0.000037817354,0.00005574679,0.00021214575,0.00015648785,0.00050320517,0.0000126380955,0.00028202706,0.000018779909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011380942,0.00002558616,0.00010161068,0.000004800433,0.000012948747,0.0000023048224,0.089080356,1.1982569e-7,0.000019921114,0.89743483,0.011577092,0.0017290408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018559709,0.000042939464,0.00053081155,0.0000027195529,0.000016031012,0.0000033028418,0.015170295,7.6947526e-7,0.000004355146,0.0068668677,0.9771302,0.000046127658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037321737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029505222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003925279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010188322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5641955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013296520","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1378","title":"Confronting Accessibility in Clinical Legal Education: Human Rights Law and the Accommodation of Law Students with Disabilities in External Placements","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Reasonable accommodation; Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Duty; Human rights; Psychology","score_opus":0.09602452262224599,"score_gpt":0.49957155230346584,"score_spread":0.40354702968121986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013296520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91070825,0.000025088866,0.000005215852,0.034867983,0.000103185484,0.00015342576,0.0000022034715,0.000002308403,0.054132342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951984,0.0000071573704,0.00009247777,0.0036356358,0.0009770541,0.0000033982287,0.0000010741117,0.0000028856925,0.00008188535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982345,0.00061249145,0.00063592644,0.000090233705,0.00032033472,0.00010651253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989163,0.00031320515,0.00048741992,0.00004610851,0.00017569872,0.00006124063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019666522,0.000061915,0.00022492271,0.00003468299,0.00054324867,0.0002646445,0.00018009255,0.000058933107,0.000023426039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023752303,0.000043337175,0.00003624924,0.00013346256,0.001101415,0.0011050103,0.000037745525,0.00036551204,2.569775e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014080743,0.00019744523,0.044578224,0.000011743914,0.000012803594,2.6630042e-7,0.06139187,2.826993e-7,0.0000031563352,0.89343697,0.000040065253,0.00018634202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0097023025,0.00037454456,0.5219395,0.00021475421,0.00010377456,0.000006585333,0.11505907,0.00001029535,0.000030620726,0.235695,0.11653325,0.0003302915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08213706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04736827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65774196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000688351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048002048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97001475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013577763","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1377","title":"Home, Precarious Home: A Year of Housing Law Advocacy at a Saskatoon Legal Clinic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Legal service; Representation (politics); Political science; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05871959572544358,"score_gpt":0.39984632916115737,"score_spread":0.34112673343571376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013577763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67094046,0.0001341277,0.00000971174,0.15527403,0.00039865475,0.000102681995,0.0000113679225,0.0000171832,0.17311177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875439,0.00007726588,0.00015948467,0.00864497,0.0028998014,6.3613766e-7,0.0000010679694,0.0000094772,0.0006633889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998785,0.0002003549,0.00043081093,0.00008059394,0.00032992044,0.00017332523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988689,0.00013246111,0.0005402906,0.00004396538,0.00026978078,0.00014461455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005560032,0.00007217132,0.00023852871,0.0000622437,0.0006061431,0.00015322145,0.00013640962,0.00010637974,0.00013386794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023885223,0.00006946718,0.00011613542,0.0003577542,0.00042159727,0.00068686577,0.00003599262,0.00034342043,0.0000128705315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013421477,0.00011424799,0.0005180524,0.00002981781,0.00006416435,0.000005094233,0.18806176,6.0944376e-7,0.00025241246,0.799303,0.010159316,0.0013573439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007448584,0.000180439,0.0014587124,0.000017768254,0.000054558466,0.0000054497464,0.0107623525,9.96282e-7,0.000053207128,0.0043397336,0.9822626,0.00011931029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014828339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033179058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9721033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010461016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015905879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013616847","doi":"","title":"ACCLE and Bill C-75: Implications for Student Legal Clinics & Communities in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13615245027830042,"score_gpt":0.4707371071459603,"score_spread":0.33458465686765987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013616847","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3489902,0.00006869046,0.000016466634,0.6393242,0.00012556963,0.000106278596,0.000029047895,0.000003095061,0.011336452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978787,0.0001856429,0.000094852956,0.019954184,0.00090108375,0.0000029494752,0.00000155635,0.0000032203495,0.00006950686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994009,0.00010551733,0.00025522624,0.000032931748,0.00009994045,0.00010549718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992464,0.00028032644,0.00018025372,0.000025555875,0.00018292153,0.00008455028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040113303,0.000037169357,0.000111882844,0.000033371438,0.00054533494,0.00012813963,0.00010270493,0.000031398777,0.000010753857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021041253,0.00003228583,0.000022429283,0.00014851532,0.00011459665,0.00034604137,0.000018050707,0.00020292039,1.8772253e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012803514,0.00003150676,0.0068859,0.000006289035,0.00001543647,2.8317797e-7,0.08054718,0.0000010441128,0.0000054480165,0.90383273,0.005516846,0.003144553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002974888,0.000033421962,0.031512365,0.0000033290348,0.000011272093,0.0000013646105,0.06997507,0.0000028897582,8.662485e-7,0.005387305,0.89272594,0.000048699876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9300865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91690636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8984454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014395823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032361168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57407326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013925780","doi":"","title":"Duets, Not Solos: The McLachlin Court’s Co-Authorship Legacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0811891587362291,"score_gpt":0.4052365622287247,"score_spread":0.32404740349249556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013925780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032028884,0.000060057257,0.0004949405,0.38668618,0.0035761427,0.00017275967,0.000009576875,0.00008809656,0.5768834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97187734,0.000047859834,0.00054661906,0.015092984,0.0061581153,0.000006251853,0.0000041780054,0.000016157825,0.0062505035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997772,0.0006664875,0.00034840347,0.00014817987,0.00062879955,0.00043612596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981573,0.00048368136,0.00030093416,0.0002383286,0.000597735,0.00022201674],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040651555,0.00011092968,0.00011803125,0.00006734708,0.0055605965,0.0016604263,0.0005748703,0.00012686683,0.0040493417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012525935,0.000080000835,0.00007896461,0.000422276,0.00095595594,0.0014976477,0.000027871392,0.0011908584,0.0010562517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003517814,0.000101546495,0.00048341966,0.0000018109206,0.000036851154,0.000008933446,0.044317752,0.0000013015338,0.000107910535,0.8099575,0.14138196,0.0035658157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001741232,0.00004173881,0.0010419672,0.000009509377,0.00002300063,0.000060293965,0.008815261,0.0000121319,0.00021343333,0.008062108,0.9814264,0.0001200436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056601726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014743382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010640699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009965061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014905033","doi":"","title":"First nations and the NSW bar","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bar News: The Journal of the NSW Bar Association","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Geography; Population; State (computer science); Australian population; Socioeconomics; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.02265332885696516,"score_gpt":0.33168339292037174,"score_spread":0.3090300640634066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014905033","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08670353,0.00028202392,0.0003369393,0.8301873,0.0036426333,0.00045659332,0.000009819904,0.00002300932,0.07835815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851129,0.0006704633,0.00012287793,0.003415657,0.0021935743,0.000005261248,7.93146e-7,0.000010327986,0.0084681325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971337,0.0013710104,0.0004358823,0.00007922542,0.00077231205,0.00020792522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467814,0.0032430398,0.00075196224,0.00021911712,0.0010427554,0.00006496359],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068260604,0.000093337505,0.000143531,0.00007873747,0.0037828889,0.00036299392,0.0005854146,0.00010971375,0.0004471113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015462699,0.000048265512,0.00012083976,0.00067883206,0.0003369118,0.0007883377,0.000058831698,0.0005324984,0.00011656432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001703593,0.00021749806,0.023134064,0.000011153891,0.00044456977,4.1408654e-7,0.17129554,0.000100815996,0.00023022642,0.3258848,0.47643775,0.0020728132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008206476,0.000036758807,0.035526548,0.00003822095,0.00023246487,0.000009111026,0.012979873,0.00009457124,0.00008122874,0.01038419,0.93969,0.00010639873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020552857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008108854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89840937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000434749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067834643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99751407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014991094","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1118","title":"More lawyers, more litigation?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil litigation; Legal profession; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.03865006339226245,"score_gpt":0.35672241197888493,"score_spread":0.3180723485866225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014991094","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043519776,0.00008584186,0.00008329652,0.8162017,0.0005070519,0.00023692132,0.00003228822,0.00027903024,0.1390541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621247,0.0000891509,0.0020186466,0.019495403,0.0012674801,0.000047445366,0.000081947604,0.000021510605,0.014853735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864835,0.00015690767,0.00024002929,0.00022946269,0.00044457713,0.00028067362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902284,0.00018157194,0.00013972216,0.00014018085,0.0002867492,0.00022895564],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024570408,0.00012548675,0.00014255826,0.00003258443,0.0011927814,0.00045985435,0.00025053474,0.00012350251,0.0022214486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016659832,0.00013178034,0.000068756206,0.000703792,0.00054403656,0.0024278713,0.00003685645,0.00035506117,0.00033012434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017533475,0.000041190637,0.0031128412,0.000024066185,0.000027977272,0.0000038748876,0.20461397,0.000005342086,0.0001644424,0.65389675,0.13737689,0.00071511057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011037288,0.000025563742,0.0014810921,0.000006956615,0.0000145000095,8.310057e-7,0.10499646,0.000006557791,0.00014570571,0.0015262037,0.89152884,0.00015689559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027582913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004937651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9186049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121166275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012493584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020830203","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2008.00144.x","title":"To Lawyer or Not to Lawyer: <i>Is</i> that the Question?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Legal service; Economic Justice; Legal profession; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.3002855949768109,"score_gpt":0.5415371594144396,"score_spread":0.24125156443762868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020830203","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124425694,0.0002924157,0.00013812531,0.8521605,0.0015928372,0.00019960427,0.000004602984,0.000021752274,0.021164449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8782521,0.00048174456,0.0012546502,0.0993261,0.0015263486,0.000010984373,1.6364376e-7,0.000009113233,0.019138817],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980348,0.00030330615,0.00043210472,0.00013339274,0.0008302865,0.00026613113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972036,0.0011152436,0.0002441794,0.00014142973,0.0010658939,0.00022967],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015143305,0.00011596052,0.00025685647,0.00010951484,0.0014167622,0.0001661282,0.00035998176,0.00005558406,0.0002665817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051011983,0.00006455696,0.000108636086,0.0009909484,0.00024701218,0.00071614876,0.00007713753,0.00048148242,0.00020332792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016634726,0.0001328533,0.0051254374,0.0000028741572,0.00009731201,0.000027611715,0.06784365,0.000014095418,0.000024970408,0.009325342,0.91636133,0.00087818335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012812494,0.00016546744,0.013461197,0.000022250186,0.000029275032,0.00003956433,0.013034712,3.1772663e-7,0.00012044697,0.00026678646,0.9726308,0.0001010701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076167146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001355762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7538264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019732957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081073574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022039109","doi":"","title":"Court Fee-waiver Processes in Canada: How Wrong Assumptions, Change Resistance and Data Vacuums Hurt Vulnerable Parties","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Waiver; Tribunal; Business; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.10400577680557874,"score_gpt":0.3416109885132002,"score_spread":0.23760521170762147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022039109","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08422004,0.013557233,0.00031554632,0.89592355,0.00038074455,0.0003114706,0.00003677555,0.000033424138,0.0052212216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98375887,0.01146195,0.00007996288,0.0016145761,0.00055679603,0.0000144232445,0.000015156159,0.000008790531,0.0024894786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980999,0.00023568438,0.0001774035,0.00020643845,0.00035410488,0.000926445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923,0.00017048026,0.0001679705,0.00012966908,0.00018127052,0.00012056735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018480307,0.00008773909,0.000120253615,0.00005050463,0.000789247,0.00028743708,0.0003755996,0.00004058892,0.00008803337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015355822,0.000086477936,0.000009046944,0.00059315574,0.00006396315,0.0020175073,0.00004133093,0.0016837236,0.0000047980193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018540173,0.00021003906,0.12896863,0.00017926811,0.00026804255,0.000028197208,0.064789765,0.0000132258765,0.00006645951,0.62180847,0.16630997,0.017172528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002773349,0.000024686382,0.004808308,0.000030086483,0.00002501547,0.0000100694415,0.09089593,0.00004932095,0.000006876397,0.006481282,0.89720976,0.0001813475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.530825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8995388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014954277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034241933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.971233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W302296022","doi":"10.14453/ltc.531","title":"Contents, acknowledgements and contributors","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law/text/culture","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"History; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03941823860959703,"score_gpt":0.3739004724613876,"score_spread":0.33448223385179054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W302296022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03819494,0.0029800502,0.00009047612,0.023394715,0.00567861,0.0005848914,0.000046761153,0.00017981404,0.92884976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93692786,0.00014449652,0.00021108058,0.0036804157,0.0011194947,0.00002203759,0.000024871651,0.0000074019754,0.057862367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903435,0.00014074694,0.00015138244,0.00012992231,0.00021988251,0.00032372793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990499,0.000071684386,0.00009677009,0.00011652637,0.00046979697,0.00019534424],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044643247,0.00009567583,0.00010766117,0.000023599689,0.0007384568,0.00022072619,0.00012977909,0.00012305536,0.0019641016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009841272,0.00007840164,0.000031169737,0.00029319577,0.00018531387,0.001185912,0.000031409898,0.00024614262,0.00077745045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000703978,0.00014592911,0.010544347,0.000006872362,0.000035324043,3.4810952e-7,0.039566297,3.9030002e-8,0.00017469467,0.6590053,0.2884425,0.00207136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025672727,0.000011831538,0.005026367,0.0000089069235,0.0000224921,7.858479e-7,0.0076433355,5.0462864e-7,0.00008796598,0.0008993112,0.98592806,0.00011370531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007563481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010763314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8987329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006970006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007184811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028311999","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3489","title":"Pillars of Justice: Lawyers and the Liberal Tradition, by Owen Fiss","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; HERO; Law; Sociology; Resilience (materials science); Criminology; Political science; Law and economics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.035978582492657674,"score_gpt":0.32261047470107124,"score_spread":0.28663189220841356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028311999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023277015,0.00025522235,0.00016768894,0.42929438,0.0002732623,0.00006438971,0.00001017562,0.000013416407,0.56759375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98880583,0.00030132703,0.00039526066,0.009445384,0.00046813022,0.0000024750298,0.000003694271,0.000005840277,0.00057203876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999014,0.00027912925,0.0002253388,0.000077487646,0.0002779091,0.00012614497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913317,0.00028120828,0.0002110983,0.00005543033,0.00016738771,0.00015173451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074500503,0.000056639048,0.00010135221,0.000014442265,0.0010393247,0.00025914478,0.00017285549,0.000045601213,0.00047717956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048555667,0.000041652944,0.00004134635,0.0002189247,0.00045341637,0.000579529,0.0000101406295,0.00042276052,0.000009868693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034003453,0.00002535426,0.000062861465,0.0000064294877,0.000022294886,0.0000010180644,0.015842432,0.0000053190493,0.00006673418,0.87230486,0.11113256,0.00049611233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012204192,0.00005622158,0.0001827403,0.000016536911,0.00013389319,0.000029237568,0.021446662,0.00007377,0.00007985952,0.046866454,0.9297641,0.00013008386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007386727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030018447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98647815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021520906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023993349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028386462","doi":"","title":"Archer Library: SOC215 - Canadian Justice System: Additional Resources","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.04284840177877106,"score_gpt":0.342657705623536,"score_spread":0.2998093038447649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028386462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010975869,0.0000066598986,0.000019586887,0.094691426,0.0006315112,0.000072122595,0.00013524751,0.000122020625,0.9032238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74036556,0.0000032452206,0.0022212865,0.010126266,0.0036441083,0.00002482927,0.00013347228,0.000010131654,0.24347107],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922323,0.00013694882,0.00010813351,0.00011256661,0.00020121176,0.00021793053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991686,0.0002804736,0.000044941506,0.000099764875,0.00016205129,0.00024417415],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028786887,0.00004601357,0.00004279691,0.0001184309,0.001225615,0.00032657813,0.00017596496,0.00006380196,0.17393328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005633627,0.00004411326,0.000017511438,0.0005374788,0.00024970443,0.0009152208,0.000010939021,0.00013299797,0.0028536853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010297697,0.000005657576,0.00006936179,0.000002805754,0.0000032889152,4.399553e-7,0.004882931,4.8245393e-8,6.148822e-7,0.3964989,0.59831065,0.00022426418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002880891,0.0000072486887,0.0010093099,0.000008337709,0.000012980849,0.0000010730823,0.02549316,0.00001294786,0.000004717585,0.0007029952,0.97265345,0.00006497416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36013418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45364606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.739268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011078021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002694459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979227},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3032037380","doi":"","title":"Archer Library: SOC215 - Canadian Justice System: Doing a Search","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.07019292954047744,"score_gpt":0.39513591578247925,"score_spread":0.3249429862420018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032037380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004176824,0.000008511174,0.00017941638,0.09495042,0.00071572507,0.00010769705,0.0000030968702,0.00011829112,0.89974004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8918553,0.0000043957316,0.0030382923,0.0040868274,0.0012964465,0.0000068338513,0.0000044775356,0.000007846575,0.09969956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909675,0.00018292076,0.00010424642,0.000117277086,0.00019857826,0.0003002069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923176,0.0001659408,0.000024986175,0.00012302917,0.00017414804,0.00028016727],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006401385,0.0000439329,0.0000463622,0.00013826643,0.0012031938,0.00043336506,0.0001925075,0.00006030628,0.010306706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023693609,0.00004190267,0.000015464095,0.00078634854,0.00017995531,0.0010290558,0.00001631699,0.00018036533,0.002080001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016079817,0.000008830226,0.00053477497,0.000012155591,0.000005580602,0.0000012677153,0.022284888,2.7105392e-7,0.000008940304,0.8067664,0.16892634,0.0014489286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034622302,0.000007576987,0.0003838908,0.000008288308,0.000012125567,9.654215e-7,0.0506321,0.000050953477,0.000034324108,0.00013020457,0.94864255,0.00006240606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7157084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56257904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8876785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001564893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047571952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033184756","doi":"10.21991/cf29400","title":"Un-Chartered Waters: Ontario’s Campus Speech Directive and the Intersections of Academic Freedom, Expressive Freedom, and Institutional Autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; Academic freedom; Harassment; Government (linguistics); Free speech; Political science; Autonomy; Christian ministry; Sociology; Law; Higher education; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.026411209778183037,"score_gpt":0.2871335909468699,"score_spread":0.26072238116868685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033184756","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15502876,0.0021493586,0.12165391,0.44251516,0.008567704,0.004166527,0.0009431104,0.00048143542,0.26449403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99457633,0.000119227865,0.0021156566,0.0022936494,0.00035655475,0.00014297689,0.00006704248,0.0000075365137,0.00032103347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760324,0.00025361593,0.0006905249,0.0005045357,0.00048768954,0.0004603951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775815,0.0006872839,0.0004093251,0.00020139024,0.00061386055,0.00032999928],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066789374,0.0002837991,0.00038294087,0.00019287143,0.0029675257,0.00019207704,0.0003451863,0.00025376744,0.00042632062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020161027,0.00023721778,0.00013707981,0.0005554563,0.019338574,0.0018023603,0.00021415032,0.0009584789,0.000036523656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019429043,0.000058453203,0.0125167435,0.000012303814,0.00013748475,0.000005351874,0.012471712,0.00019697436,0.00018986494,0.97097075,0.0022918922,0.0009541853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071308743,0.00012489504,0.006124125,0.00025019379,0.00034432736,0.00035546045,0.042096607,0.0011419732,0.000499203,0.04203695,0.89903075,0.0008646221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0216157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008493217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9289338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041900662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065935506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035188578","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3616319","title":"Billing without Bilking: Regulating Time-Based Legal Fees","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.0318688346320876,"score_gpt":0.33354540057550847,"score_spread":0.30167656594342085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035188578","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23875141,0.00065400836,0.024490532,0.66505593,0.00072487036,0.0003314585,0.0000020126386,0.00030134353,0.06968842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99250686,0.000083747334,0.00086544815,0.0024413231,0.0014120194,0.0000028421796,0.000003089639,0.000016907325,0.0026677886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977364,0.00025334387,0.00027103917,0.00015871553,0.0004019561,0.001178536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991286,0.00016028916,0.0002575274,0.00007934127,0.00022204751,0.00015223907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024811812,0.00009598749,0.00011818158,0.00008855058,0.0012802661,0.00042612778,0.00025811608,0.00006712841,0.00035656875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015162157,0.000089476816,0.000072165894,0.0007339666,0.00009039339,0.0008130689,0.000011777991,0.0020806503,0.00013099745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007316071,0.00008666648,0.0061351787,0.0000060487414,0.000092952934,0.000002047706,0.010370526,0.0005926511,0.0020162275,0.957633,0.0016090736,0.021382472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009925769,0.0002713149,0.00027998112,0.0000425666,0.000074478,0.00004204316,0.030239187,0.004091128,0.00040149598,0.053627208,0.90944916,0.00048886344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009912344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010475407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9078401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053717155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013892092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035453728","doi":"10.1111/1467-9752.12434","title":"Good Faith and Trustworthiness in University Governance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Philosophy of Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Corporate governance; Higher education; Political science; Obligation; Faith; Public relations; Trustworthiness; Relation (database); Business ethics; Sociology; Public administration; Moral obligation; Management; Law; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.037365583446204956,"score_gpt":0.3221833241163618,"score_spread":0.28481774067015686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035453728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5602214,0.00026174018,0.00005203801,0.37110767,0.00058356486,0.000079405945,0.000002627345,0.0000035651665,0.06768802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980238,0.0001830139,0.0006564135,0.000531518,0.00046681846,1.3102971e-7,5.093245e-7,0.000001903505,0.00013586236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947655,0.00008475647,0.00018038129,0.000049444978,0.0001619836,0.0000468762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991,0.0000857902,0.0004296865,0.00003288656,0.00028270742,0.000068902824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030268467,0.000032324595,0.00008552917,0.000062994804,0.000063864536,0.000017628634,0.000103508166,0.00003096738,0.00006978642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005811512,0.000033831766,0.000021701326,0.0005122873,0.00006827992,0.00079030794,0.00000664092,0.00017428654,0.0000013785531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083347404,0.00034528988,0.03934559,0.000038427344,0.000015351594,0.0000015191979,0.0427932,0.000016246868,0.0001740698,0.90273213,0.0032742703,0.011180579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009969589,0.00023094247,0.32232162,0.00019118044,0.000058487887,0.000008561413,0.042121947,0.000025763007,0.0001187085,0.052538816,0.5811732,0.00021385499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004729385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000091312446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8501933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006488695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013216711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23445876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037302220","doi":"","title":"Social Science Evidence in Poverty-Related Charter Claims:","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Poverty; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Scientific evidence; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.11936704409769806,"score_gpt":0.4390345066585063,"score_spread":0.31966746256080825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037302220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016716846,0.051518872,0.0000072994385,0.20494702,0.00054570084,0.00075625087,0.0000070072156,0.000054688666,0.74049145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93710715,0.04006288,0.0000148803,0.022578195,0.00015001536,0.000019745163,0.0000060400703,0.000005346048,0.00005573315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998548,0.00011490638,0.00043757638,0.00021755733,0.00045079572,0.00023120196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992663,0.000061861036,0.00022790098,0.000103281745,0.00021655037,0.00012406004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015744672,0.00008996877,0.00022718491,0.000032261083,0.0004539984,0.0000763064,0.00027128935,0.000042426065,0.00018528503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028431386,0.00007070853,0.0000510671,0.0011545699,0.00077708653,0.0014573251,0.000053456988,0.00031350262,0.000035133955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003965867,0.000035582016,0.00005931717,0.00078632584,0.0000025386962,1.9835153e-7,0.0048154085,6.886131e-9,0.000015495572,0.98054236,0.0010329186,0.012705907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010505708,0.000028228382,0.00021643468,0.0022040352,0.000014932097,5.017143e-7,0.00037861225,0.0000033524746,0.000019005962,0.0018392714,0.99509025,0.00010031957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014207768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044359357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99405736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011236529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045929424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34918344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039814737","doi":"10.1177/1037969x20938203","title":"Justice Carolyn Simpson and women’s changing place in the legal profession: ‘Yes, you can!’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternative Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Quarter (Canadian coin); Supreme court; Law; Legal profession; Project commissioning; Sociology; Political science; Publishing; History","score_opus":0.06636835495420072,"score_gpt":0.39202903495694175,"score_spread":0.325660680002741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039814737","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4416498,0.00016973562,0.00013011997,0.494732,0.0011588405,0.0002111754,0.000006564087,0.000017881664,0.06192392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808646,0.00011952845,0.00008924304,0.016685966,0.0016504986,0.000017368184,0.0000011146897,0.000005911482,0.0005657617],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984875,0.00053981424,0.00018496481,0.00011988449,0.00037748695,0.00029036123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914443,0.00034713233,0.00017505886,0.000054360662,0.00013768421,0.00014135365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001535237,0.00007674881,0.000090831614,0.000059043192,0.0013428093,0.00043857776,0.0002526624,0.000036255202,0.00020699811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069573906,0.000056060802,0.000017873683,0.0004914429,0.00012357898,0.0008531095,0.000032836415,0.0008906341,0.00000896145],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033968743,0.000041937263,0.00067504315,0.000008667862,0.000018670826,0.000042051615,0.5694508,0.000031422136,0.000028964687,0.42486912,0.0026889252,0.002110428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033389835,0.000049715523,0.00033778496,0.000022177754,0.00001532455,0.000027714843,0.36661053,0.00015702691,0.000028958553,0.0014193687,0.6309056,0.000091849586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005856862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054546036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62821674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017363307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041907647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039919733","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0100","title":"Angela Fernandez, <i>Pierson v. Post, The Hunt for the Fox: Law and Professionalization in American Legal Culture</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Professionalization; Legal culture; Political science; Law; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.023642886250249066,"score_gpt":0.30790902438735934,"score_spread":0.28426613813711027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039919733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022113739,0.0016166058,0.0033883613,0.7277051,0.0006807867,0.0007731381,0.000038290393,0.000026023903,0.2436579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936445,0.00030640585,0.00039129297,0.004742255,0.0001555311,3.0622786e-7,0.0000024972862,0.000002487346,0.0007547629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999459,0.00014789528,0.00007614621,0.00006235356,0.00016429898,0.00009027883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993364,0.00016125049,0.00020452784,0.000040814135,0.00020699586,0.00004998753],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038590643,0.000038945946,0.00006212472,0.0000050197173,0.0014803242,0.00008230479,0.0001837373,0.000026175652,0.00015709708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000141029,0.00002654456,0.0000328902,0.00007944986,0.00033946845,0.0008023721,0.000021266273,0.00018202138,6.536054e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012027985,0.00004619038,0.000718152,0.00000553522,0.000029022634,0.0000013683482,0.14613432,0.000011868431,0.00007965224,0.83736885,0.010866684,0.004618089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022490887,0.000045997487,0.001722835,0.000007768089,0.000019187035,0.0000017700628,0.13446742,0.00004775142,0.00000507933,0.0001756254,0.863248,0.00003367566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20070994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40437067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97153074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010482651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001957738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041149806","doi":"10.32920/29913059.v1","title":"Pragmatic Assorted Strategies: How Canadian Cause Lawyers Contribute to Social Change","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07732422968167321,"score_gpt":0.41340574872562524,"score_spread":0.336081519043952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041149806","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006025925,0.0000075012977,0.00023568014,0.6064911,0.0006381335,0.00040946968,0.00003252705,0.00006845645,0.3860912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94481283,0.000005693764,0.00014890757,0.021457851,0.00026884538,0.00010523544,0.000025117763,0.0000042679003,0.03317127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990765,0.00015720776,0.00011710555,0.0001307044,0.00018341141,0.00033507927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991481,0.00017058641,0.000050003106,0.00009674912,0.0003387301,0.00019586236],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006158153,0.000069871574,0.000095257084,0.00023311988,0.0009910058,0.0007430904,0.00017113761,0.00009676436,0.00096182595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00111952,0.000071926144,0.000025847296,0.0013964286,0.00006290412,0.0008742032,0.000010945762,0.0001775668,0.00012568488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016130648,0.000017126977,0.00037111205,0.0000040415234,0.000027854026,0.0000012442662,0.02773056,2.7412503e-7,0.000010315787,0.78303134,0.18772571,0.0010788292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010802713,0.0000057437883,0.005871679,0.0000066734337,0.000018279541,8.7747175e-8,0.050722815,0.000006940216,0.00000490228,0.001559137,0.9416058,0.0000898964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7300464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9655381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93878686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040903615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004638603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042524624","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide (ARCHIVE): Provincial & Territory Legislation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Public administration; Library science; Law; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.11186610483615483,"score_gpt":0.4115374218235995,"score_spread":0.29967131698744465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042524624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021822478,0.00022513514,0.000028353285,0.09797216,0.005104791,0.0008961307,0.00032905894,0.00024472695,0.89517784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015890002,0.00043678694,0.003959127,0.0052767326,0.013913471,0.0001635757,0.0015616503,0.000094199626,0.9730055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946809,0.0015504374,0.00077738933,0.0006250378,0.001280062,0.0010862135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967796,0.00084359304,0.00028390175,0.0006186766,0.0007579983,0.00071620464],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034596124,0.00028602357,0.00028615154,0.0017731249,0.00270411,0.0017091475,0.0013576763,0.00075450126,0.022382248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036192886,0.0002952904,0.00013233133,0.0012374148,0.0008586742,0.0042289076,0.00014311062,0.0023973335,0.0014169003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063336215,0.00003543202,0.00015381674,0.00001259656,0.000020036869,0.000011196141,0.0058115507,9.019305e-8,0.0000017968696,0.27983567,0.70960003,0.0045114304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008241875,0.000036747868,0.00021783315,0.000075737116,0.000018181714,0.0000023519208,0.0048993495,0.000002477683,0.000009495554,0.0066524963,0.9876475,0.00035545617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98646283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9755666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27804738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000791205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.075277776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042584627","doi":"","title":"Really Basic Rules for Writing Good Papers in Law School","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal writing; Law; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Legal research","score_opus":0.02612981119485827,"score_gpt":0.3398927623038475,"score_spread":0.3137629511089892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042584627","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052886248,0.00071136944,0.0011968742,0.5122874,0.00038552575,0.0004303348,0.0000062153717,0.000078410514,0.43201762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920025,0.00062781415,0.00043632564,0.004834859,0.00095464755,0.000013076862,0.000004372062,0.000010755746,0.001115641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982723,0.00014113597,0.0002441861,0.00011973575,0.0002007527,0.0010219122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993801,0.0001988924,0.0001343306,0.00004766669,0.00011178193,0.00012721602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022875383,0.00006407278,0.00008729773,0.000049231076,0.00061137805,0.00021999449,0.0001970059,0.00005714204,0.00019022524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013881234,0.00006554135,0.000053144915,0.00033530834,0.00006356681,0.00054147065,0.0000086233495,0.0016207055,0.000040111227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018200337,0.000024430004,0.0009026375,0.000002596256,0.000016418506,4.3413215e-7,0.0024195586,0.0000043567993,0.00013550332,0.98840356,0.00031922932,0.0077530905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069503527,0.00014562364,0.0005564361,0.000018363457,0.000019316658,0.00001279904,0.066891335,0.000031567088,0.000016039123,0.22108036,0.7103603,0.0001728002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013729935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01865328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93911624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060190255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007997631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043496556","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Law Course Reserves: Aboriginal Law & Policy in Canada (LAW 453)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14921313142067064,"score_gpt":0.5221195074610093,"score_spread":0.3729063760403387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043496556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015222504,0.00047218247,4.8619603e-7,0.22698265,0.0019253097,0.00042723163,0.00015141496,0.000054096006,0.7698344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14362454,0.0011336431,0.0008501888,0.042959694,0.011133989,0.00026228413,0.000648846,0.00011719383,0.7992696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99269354,0.0017043033,0.0008330692,0.00057910447,0.0029773097,0.0012126816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936793,0.0017195034,0.00028374305,0.00078620797,0.0029561673,0.0005750829],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008081951,0.00028841305,0.00042853176,0.00039612656,0.001430986,0.000990809,0.0014944731,0.00048080628,0.003154471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002145917,0.00028402417,0.00006159448,0.0034480041,0.0014240585,0.0015120994,0.000109870874,0.0027149997,0.0002841031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059441318,0.000046077465,0.000059282716,0.000016939319,0.000012807869,0.000012845748,0.0022822833,0.0000022073211,1.8198921e-7,0.50838494,0.48911297,0.00006351023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018341727,0.000023320212,0.000042709034,0.00009662214,0.00001119936,0.0000018010614,0.034929726,0.0000022060428,0.0000042868687,0.02334849,0.9410457,0.0003105203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48503646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060779606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18501137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043982908","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0003","title":"Catalytic agents? Lon Fuller, James Milner, and the lawyer as social architect, 1950–69","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Scholarship; Law; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Variety (cybernetics); Legal education; Political science","score_opus":0.029968031947274987,"score_gpt":0.2937238616934155,"score_spread":0.26375582974614054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043982908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036200233,0.00057452015,0.00014621562,0.2755085,0.00033173498,0.00014427405,0.0000073277597,0.000021870756,0.68706536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945586,0.0004059149,0.00020332131,0.0020034967,0.00035892028,6.30728e-8,0.0000016754622,0.0000032286478,0.002464783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991886,0.00024619309,0.00009833735,0.000083529805,0.0002561371,0.0001271829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993892,0.00014119993,0.00016729103,0.000048774746,0.00012966625,0.00012391104],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044380405,0.00005428052,0.000105419924,0.000010892044,0.0018918328,0.00010764561,0.0002463014,0.000044396613,0.0022781577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017447559,0.000048089452,0.00006905829,0.00006807751,0.00063820696,0.00063715444,0.000046992634,0.00027973304,0.00002413928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032795043,0.00007159803,0.00024535638,0.0000093462295,0.00011905065,0.000013674291,0.38923645,0.000004690068,0.000018012342,0.53489536,0.06318595,0.011872552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082654704,0.00003263396,0.0005614362,0.000005050907,0.000050823735,0.0000064227584,0.087677956,0.000017049082,0.000004786363,0.00093916006,0.9098142,0.00006396308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17601478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07476541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95835835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010664175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002870963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044309107","doi":"10.17323/2072-8166.2020.2.254.260","title":"Искусство судить","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Art; Psychology","score_opus":0.06947252083414208,"score_gpt":0.31854749482865996,"score_spread":0.2490749739945179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044309107","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20800819,0.00017713371,0.000026055088,0.42091066,0.0036324584,0.00009822786,0.000006092262,0.000008310432,0.3671329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890025,0.00007718486,0.0007535477,0.008007237,0.0009957753,3.9862218e-7,1.5750048e-7,0.0000054155416,0.0011577391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993064,0.0001017389,0.00037759452,0.000048754948,0.00007978568,0.00008577083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878496,0.00011315952,0.00067211327,0.00010458493,0.00019044681,0.00013476443],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048342822,0.000044866094,0.00012271304,0.000018644185,0.00020592922,0.000090823356,0.0004579927,0.000044560147,0.0015518003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003648935,0.000034566296,0.000105692074,0.00016245517,0.000118689764,0.00073659816,0.000028792141,0.00031179906,0.000067274435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002899508,0.000035461166,0.0022471643,0.0000040057294,0.000042904543,3.779147e-7,0.0020690646,0.00021544471,0.000060904873,0.9635118,0.0315922,0.00019164885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017409654,0.000024629055,0.0019602512,0.0000074931218,0.000022552531,0.000001554162,0.00085244956,0.0000037660313,0.0002725376,0.010853006,0.9857816,0.000046049954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006808728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004902733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9541894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006560463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004954117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046756140","doi":"","title":"Differential treatment: how testimony is discussed in assault and sexual assault cases at the Court of Appeal of Québec.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DH","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Sexual assault; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Law; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.08205392744769886,"score_gpt":0.3564691125873369,"score_spread":0.27441518513963803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046756140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7765063,0.000051143797,0.0000109308185,0.22071475,0.00005844296,0.00012471601,0.000055175205,0.00000808548,0.0024704365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972029,0.000017206738,0.000026016001,0.00035528024,0.00007840134,0.00000893877,0.000011520227,0.0000036019478,0.0022961567],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993537,0.00011164283,0.00012511718,0.00010404738,0.00021590068,0.00008957489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992862,0.00038802065,0.000115645176,0.000077645054,0.00008641015,0.000046103032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011788325,0.00005675683,0.000107375956,0.000023271428,0.00014836753,0.00004016225,0.00007572139,0.000049546423,0.00043595265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069246796,0.000036484238,0.000019293147,0.0002517511,0.00020065773,0.00014995254,0.000018769388,0.000094710165,0.000005200742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001882235,0.00093232404,0.48663878,0.00006409217,0.00014600129,0.000010507707,0.38037553,0.000009800156,0.0089892885,0.008008021,0.0844775,0.030159917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020335293,0.0006788735,0.20719215,0.0000250559,0.00017092409,0.0000048779852,0.104001544,0.0006463004,0.005305059,0.00017548999,0.67942506,0.00034111275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09948409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10921883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5949476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005226663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039633331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9070356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049269530","doi":"","title":"The Origins of Hostility to the Rule of Law in Canadian Academia: A History of Administrativism and Anti-Historicity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Rule of law; Law; Legal history; Historicity (philosophy); Hegemony; Chivalry; Political science; Ideology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Politics","score_opus":0.021417769214879763,"score_gpt":0.32804320551084143,"score_spread":0.3066254362959617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049269530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9260037,0.0014339819,0.000010125873,0.043695994,0.0004295148,0.00016472844,0.0000042248134,0.0000017181748,0.028256001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975345,0.00048501958,0.000009806869,0.00021531696,0.000045961286,0.000001677896,2.6043193e-7,0.0000024073609,0.0017050095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884224,0.00018124307,0.0002392169,0.000063130814,0.00019384778,0.00048030587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921894,0.0002353234,0.00022235863,0.00009938161,0.00015633453,0.0000676412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038721696,0.000041139156,0.00009954838,0.00006077788,0.00016937254,0.000010641691,0.00022210002,0.00007241702,0.000032602533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048732123,0.000028163511,0.000024527624,0.00025041497,0.00020031774,0.00016879773,0.000007982801,0.0014364889,0.0000018718757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011040655,0.00002247516,0.014205837,0.0000029059806,0.000012399458,6.221975e-8,0.013679322,0.0000016969648,0.00016965144,0.97078174,0.0003114267,0.00080142415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010460614,0.00006704952,0.017196923,0.000008942114,0.000008639418,0.0000037252946,0.007426552,0.000002721447,0.000045587436,0.011733734,0.9633596,0.000041917858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6562098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8926728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96304816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034362685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028164595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9773448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082001594","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198834328.003.0010","title":"10. Persuasive oral communication and presentations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Class (philosophy); Communication skills; Eye contact; Psychology; Body language; Persuasive communication; Medical education; Computer science; Social psychology; Medicine; Persuasion; Communication; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07895783769981153,"score_gpt":0.31464223690763304,"score_spread":0.23568439920782153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082001594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011155613,0.00006725257,0.000038775655,0.004341193,0.0000796736,0.00030325656,0.00005189367,0.000077300596,0.9950295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020405466,0.0004706658,0.00046112892,0.00021002861,0.000095835545,0.0000013335497,0.00008502136,0.000014053709,0.9966214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992548,0.000120520075,0.000109152395,0.00017587758,0.00021002183,0.00012960612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989677,0.00021940561,0.00019935849,0.00021706973,0.00024110016,0.00015537532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014315054,0.000122014455,0.00013304462,0.00009092179,0.0008743855,0.00014439491,0.00028486442,0.00019357713,0.0008337009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115919756,0.00015800659,0.000052859534,0.000020904841,0.00039897684,0.00047603078,0.00014798687,0.00044235936,0.000011830719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023853729,0.000007858713,0.000005370138,0.000008293153,0.000048596703,0.0000016702922,0.0090749515,2.7775022e-7,4.3543685e-7,0.9497259,0.039079487,0.0020232655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014931851,0.0000161776,0.000012393588,0.000016330665,0.0001031928,6.7257207e-7,0.003915315,0.000005529396,0.0000013844399,0.0011728755,0.99444807,0.0001587158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001150988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037146691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9553686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001000278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039763813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.912844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084167299","doi":"10.3138/9781487532994-006","title":"5. The Failure to Operationalize: Realism and Formalism in Canadian Common Law Contracts Teaching","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Formalism (music); Realism; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.02802687562479353,"score_gpt":0.28417425129987156,"score_spread":0.25614737567507806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084167299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000028672446,0.00020560659,0.0000035665882,0.019801408,0.00011003018,0.00033265664,0.00006765285,0.000012451922,0.97943795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0930179,0.00019483225,0.00038855663,0.0023594967,0.00016455381,0.0000011418505,0.000042673928,0.0000143800735,0.90381646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993022,0.000091495465,0.0001248325,0.00013867625,0.00018501906,0.00015779058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992237,0.00018046095,0.000109688706,0.00012869092,0.00012240077,0.00023506944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040593796,0.00009076079,0.00013453973,0.000020463092,0.0010373879,0.00013245601,0.0002737572,0.00015657098,0.000106979605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007003405,0.000097447315,0.000028126362,0.000001839932,0.00019061707,0.00035895317,0.000053364998,0.0003380737,0.0000026287464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012120436,0.0000020085506,0.0000028205045,0.000003594573,0.0000166237,0.0000044712797,0.050690684,0.00000121267,0.0000015875517,0.9335262,0.014039594,0.0016990753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011242913,0.000011446227,0.000036660178,0.000034328852,0.000018135292,4.836117e-7,0.0018150434,0.000005210366,8.891507e-7,0.0018607491,0.9960005,0.00010409427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99582803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98196095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004093322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078354735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79788536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086352963","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Subsequent consideration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08275445765846003,"score_gpt":0.358693110587028,"score_spread":0.275938652928568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086352963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000377199,0.00017182814,0.0000072793273,0.38628244,0.0020253244,0.0002304124,0.00009517426,0.00016025551,0.61102355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022263372,0.0010752269,0.0035008963,0.27366623,0.0061885323,0.00007055072,0.0026937413,0.000070673916,0.69047076],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832064,0.00028116844,0.00039588983,0.0002945275,0.00037143606,0.00033632765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851775,0.00034581506,0.00018649967,0.00021147307,0.00022623254,0.00051223784],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033042094,0.00016631854,0.00019004429,0.0001937559,0.0010944734,0.0015138886,0.00032462168,0.00038900922,0.034217287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013166668,0.00017403693,0.00007035871,0.0005743254,0.00022106142,0.0017371007,0.000025110998,0.00067535875,0.0013580619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.1218103e-7,0.0000045227744,0.000020961957,0.0000059779445,0.000011291927,0.000004852002,0.0021732838,2.5199202e-7,3.8776108e-7,0.47127023,0.52630097,0.0002067812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041090254,0.000008109977,0.000013184313,0.000020049856,0.000020341513,0.0000011271941,0.0033465447,0.00000306299,0.000016107397,0.008589009,0.9877246,0.0002167775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92422307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93413544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46268123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027693404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02255074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087291905","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6418","title":"Legal Technology and the Future of Women in Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Diversity (politics); Promotion (chess); Practice of law; Legal process; Productivity; Public relations; Equal employment opportunity; Work (physics); Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Economic growth; Politics","score_opus":0.029694280019558206,"score_gpt":0.3563620919052209,"score_spread":0.3266678118856627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087291905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40054163,0.00020512573,0.00003775226,0.4285871,0.00026654426,0.000369978,0.0000045583183,0.000025577576,0.16996172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948727,0.000029635947,0.0001989677,0.0043971683,0.0002435515,0.000018960658,3.05499e-7,0.0000037945006,0.00023495578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993402,0.000084245854,0.00017572014,0.00009689198,0.00014849952,0.0001544718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942136,0.00019951526,0.00010221976,0.00009377855,0.00011441786,0.00006871269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005987818,0.0000424087,0.00012950887,0.000101511134,0.00008856985,0.00006375758,0.0003318501,0.000060772054,0.00015872653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009108052,0.00003395046,0.000011971146,0.0011078989,0.00044891296,0.0004431177,0.000075493546,0.00019499497,0.000007744749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008085345,0.000023432807,0.00097113725,0.00003260692,0.000007379728,5.321569e-7,0.033430506,0.000008693585,0.00009400325,0.9632639,0.0008111429,0.0012757981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005908599,0.000042905773,0.0029357474,0.000016947844,0.00003250508,4.3446389e-7,0.058121588,0.000016351505,0.0002787068,0.003871522,0.9340134,0.0000790213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019459063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065770495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95939237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033277913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002730476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29416412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087445873","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6431","title":"Caught By Private Law: A Review Of Visitors’ Jurisdiction In Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Appeal; Visitor pattern; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Position (finance); Private law; Sociology; Comparative law; Business","score_opus":0.0639248299723872,"score_gpt":0.41718536120011396,"score_spread":0.35326053122772677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087445873","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003387799,0.94975376,0.000009562188,0.008867,0.00083318015,0.0010755208,0.00012551008,0.000013889831,0.039318178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007680082,0.99646634,0.000104754494,0.0023653598,0.00035231304,0.00007678687,0.000049031947,0.000023908045,0.0004846973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974827,0.0004068952,0.0009764315,0.0002900018,0.00061698275,0.00022699633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978988,0.00048564363,0.00090856693,0.00028114693,0.0002628768,0.00016292497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006593275,0.00019651103,0.001004369,0.00013990022,0.00009678714,0.00006877121,0.00079754123,0.00012944137,0.00051313336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014620627,0.00019530879,0.00010753032,0.0017683462,0.00006818124,0.0005435172,0.00010174426,0.0005097132,0.000030636373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015462301,0.0001812963,0.00003549908,0.2036663,0.0001740968,0.000012610181,0.0023220286,0.0000021785706,0.0000022820284,0.027463075,0.46576178,0.30036336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042554573,0.0000088988745,0.000009249099,0.025503956,0.0005500549,5.710638e-7,0.00013052726,3.1392665e-7,0.0000031160437,0.000011303832,0.9735708,0.00016861604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8337436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5393307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50780904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006755471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010435665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090394908","doi":"10.1177/2322005820946698","title":"Comparing Experiential Legal Education in Canada and India","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Experiential learning; Context (archaeology); Experiential education; Globe; Political science; Law; Public relations; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.02319583790961076,"score_gpt":0.3372449155097941,"score_spread":0.3140490776001833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090394908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83967245,0.00020100633,0.000046451532,0.10594622,0.002837149,0.00012640556,8.1243417e-7,0.000005427475,0.051164065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951477,0.000022485847,0.0006447279,0.0026526805,0.0011471919,0.0000054632396,0.000005447221,0.000007122634,0.00036718714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879414,0.0001818276,0.0004336974,0.00011294593,0.0003221966,0.00015521928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989073,0.00004701312,0.0003905627,0.00006368305,0.00033008592,0.00026135496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035598123,0.00007825141,0.00014130096,0.00015301548,0.0001881601,0.00026367488,0.00016624403,0.000038259775,0.00018395048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007584028,0.000085815096,0.000024885961,0.0005519868,0.000054986085,0.0018234198,0.000011883921,0.00043487246,0.0000045078104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012969751,0.0006218664,0.3390153,0.0000493147,0.00004331229,0.000011149319,0.21389055,0.00002855196,0.00029373902,0.16279644,0.09433286,0.1887872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002258146,0.00003448709,0.13844103,0.00004776365,0.000016007698,0.000029784062,0.18277407,0.000013275652,0.000067901376,0.00018786146,0.6780301,0.00013195562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7635691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70307183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5836972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053351605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056150936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9491998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092132422","doi":"10.53300/001c.17542","title":"The Importance of Inculcating the ‘Pro Bono Ethos’ in Law Students, and the Opportunities to Do It Better","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Legal education; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Law; Political science; Project commissioning; Public relations; Sociology; Publishing; Medicine","score_opus":0.14085309456681291,"score_gpt":0.46547350446779073,"score_spread":0.32462040990097785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092132422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007105595,0.020079989,0.0000066493026,0.9239308,0.00026483613,0.0009116462,0.0000015994963,0.000007939025,0.047690935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46698356,0.032383434,0.00022506184,0.49715638,0.00039910641,0.0005000098,0.000005344429,0.000009709507,0.002337421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826986,0.00067918503,0.0004571463,0.00013335662,0.00033058206,0.00012987942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830186,0.00086041,0.00030385825,0.0002358923,0.00022778596,0.00007018321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035408451,0.00007487678,0.00014837041,0.000016167525,0.00061945984,0.00035181348,0.00046653667,0.000025208377,0.00016065384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003076538,0.000039575003,0.000037473554,0.0005387479,0.00044057376,0.00037858458,0.00006127463,0.0003059904,0.000015166668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062964746,0.000035889327,0.0034448565,0.000117680305,0.000010016827,9.6706415e-8,0.051681053,2.1843174e-7,8.7441464e-7,0.8573561,0.060351696,0.02699525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059855818,0.000005727996,0.0015739829,0.00023397231,0.000020263158,5.86596e-7,0.03802254,9.472665e-7,0.0000013282931,0.0008565972,0.95917326,0.000050918807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032667173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018258261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8988216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003813294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010457485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49383214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092216237","doi":"10.1177/1715163520963840","title":"Looking back, looking forward: Reflections on an evolving profession","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.10239889024991794,"score_gpt":0.40373497749701337,"score_spread":0.30133608724709543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092216237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5241416,0.0008094407,0.0014727925,0.07809049,0.023412758,0.0020341636,0.00042818591,0.00034278218,0.3692678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97202826,0.0005225413,0.00045660144,0.022108048,0.0032890786,0.000013491485,0.00002283044,0.00004448034,0.0015146523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696815,0.0005825091,0.0005133203,0.00038800208,0.000626579,0.0009214226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952516,0.00020092264,0.00034212013,0.00017406818,0.00097242807,0.003058838],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011276173,0.00024919398,0.00022204939,0.000348896,0.0046798945,0.0009036943,0.00063280907,0.00008659788,0.0050112233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014881843,0.0002799221,0.00011350903,0.0015605869,0.00017235876,0.002132253,0.000024700019,0.0015041999,0.000079652964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029320267,0.00031338376,0.003758829,0.0002794748,0.00047629548,0.015453665,0.28774923,0.0038711694,0.007035382,0.013792555,0.4594973,0.20747952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076788076,0.0000671694,0.000020652347,0.000040402934,0.00009222197,0.009253451,0.002073044,0.0017055072,0.0005244648,0.00020806308,0.98465604,0.0005911325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10683568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4151781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5251587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032634742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015110059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093681448","doi":"10.29173/assert4","title":"Practice requires rationale: Lessons from global contexts to ensure controversial issue education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Social Studies Education Research for Teachers","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.4682229320607978,"score_gpt":0.6435337247440555,"score_spread":0.17531079268325767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093681448","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018568093,0.0014263481,0.00007303802,0.9315348,0.001243219,0.0014641448,0.0001858436,0.0000437748,0.045460705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486202,0.0006421714,0.0020640632,0.036722142,0.0057769306,0.0007420739,0.00017076363,0.000020161033,0.0052414774],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966421,0.0010932824,0.0004512322,0.0003877004,0.000989921,0.00043576208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98865736,0.0027202126,0.00034651314,0.00014790075,0.0078092813,0.0003187354],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002917853,0.00013878732,0.0002724466,0.00011468372,0.0019987999,0.00022486731,0.00039163482,0.00014483256,0.00030151772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06073864,0.00015661103,0.00011481703,0.0014510048,0.00057283265,0.0010824343,0.00006939194,0.0003760063,0.00010076921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014795714,0.00035308435,0.00013190463,0.000015821433,0.00015073676,5.615536e-8,0.16548601,0.0000011791283,0.000072987306,0.19720599,0.59817684,0.038257454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001451856,0.00007599248,0.0010248958,0.000015956974,0.000023847715,5.3524303e-8,0.35971785,7.291814e-7,0.000051714316,0.004451188,0.6343979,0.00009467963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011510016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015438275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9300521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040183123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009016226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093866784","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2020.1830098","title":"From partners to team leaders: tracking changes in the Canadian legal profession","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Legal profession; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Perception; Public relations; Tracking (education); Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.13424230186723862,"score_gpt":0.46413658331281477,"score_spread":0.32989428144557614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093866784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1840767,0.0000261701,0.000032169573,0.8013835,0.0042642015,0.00024168473,0.0000072322737,0.000007862243,0.009960484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606247,0.000008052338,0.00016102764,0.035336655,0.0028863263,0.000009129793,0.000004304268,0.000008315193,0.0009614794],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749523,0.0007365475,0.00036655794,0.00012706917,0.0010519824,0.00022262159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985638,0.00027498015,0.00036827606,0.000110753106,0.0005037043,0.00017844474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014644117,0.0000945178,0.000115490235,0.00017172481,0.0005871894,0.00051381794,0.0012871264,0.000102537786,0.00021555589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023517127,0.00005629924,0.00007137954,0.0005544092,0.00009657834,0.0011262867,0.00006188778,0.0011336901,0.000037646245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038025595,0.000246326,0.0144013725,0.000009348643,0.00009491956,0.000073881,0.6100808,0.00020107267,0.0036880178,0.04190599,0.30714548,0.021772586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000302179,0.000037327984,0.006964059,0.00023549877,0.000012797484,0.0000069880634,0.11858967,0.00003971018,0.00052407186,0.00069157535,0.8724997,0.0000964467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14717065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33771318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.776548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041749098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025284828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8585084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094345466","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3606","title":"Ontario Civil Justice Reform in the Wake of COVID-19: Inspired or Institutionalized?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Democracy; Law; Political science; Civil procedure; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.12157321891848417,"score_gpt":0.40948346848745354,"score_spread":0.2879102495689694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094345466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022063472,0.000089509405,0.00029814587,0.09722387,0.0007030844,0.000081193386,0.000005484897,0.000008387863,0.89938396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98190325,0.00013686587,0.0011978663,0.011214795,0.0003128792,0.0000081602,0.000010017872,0.000003948209,0.0052122287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830866,0.0004353247,0.0003935241,0.00011100684,0.0005512854,0.00020020589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866617,0.00037737464,0.00025488448,0.0001584297,0.00038967092,0.00015348394],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021541743,0.00007235174,0.00012126554,0.00006384214,0.0013558569,0.00025587028,0.0003211231,0.000082305385,0.0056831404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024810976,0.000050103405,0.000058476046,0.0006918431,0.00024432832,0.0007914162,0.000023968889,0.00074125436,0.000023929062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035173518,0.00019957451,0.00047516453,0.00001253917,0.000015358102,0.000059568152,0.031703554,0.000037434398,0.00001839598,0.96502125,0.00212063,0.00030135308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046178134,0.000019131918,0.0011207619,0.000024491821,0.000038569488,0.00021026512,0.028538737,0.0000024854116,0.000014406989,0.03754479,0.931948,0.00007655371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7177494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99596465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97969687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010383503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013294895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310079937","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v33i3.52598","title":"The Last Word on Bekkerman and Lucy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); State (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Psychology; Media studies; Law; Pedagogy; Visual arts; Art; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04104367786079907,"score_gpt":0.4214018302640289,"score_spread":0.3803581524032298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W310079937","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22800717,0.00025191577,0.000014497744,0.5496289,0.0039029713,0.0000769367,0.0000014609625,0.000004432243,0.21811172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9668401,0.00023337816,0.0013970287,0.0025947858,0.007403262,0.0000034096204,0.0000010016439,0.000005750573,0.02152127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991553,0.00014029532,0.00022389254,0.000056860074,0.000309926,0.0001137386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975055,0.0013735791,0.00028567936,0.00007963609,0.00066359836,0.000092024515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011148176,0.00004581726,0.000054664546,0.000077267534,0.0012081614,0.00023651966,0.00017345813,0.000031155883,0.00057645957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023275502,0.000031090876,0.000028975099,0.00034870012,0.00034898717,0.0004405365,0.000009453375,0.00023568528,0.00009829755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019683757,0.00008847398,0.0016972182,8.0213704e-7,0.000015934727,1.3147091e-7,0.0054281894,3.0696043e-7,0.00001887739,0.82295924,0.16230853,0.007462584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006885474,0.000043478234,0.030700468,0.000012936568,0.0000074217337,0.000009636597,0.0031887563,6.5840055e-7,0.000025187312,0.01951207,0.9463926,0.00003791325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005592044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036133887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8034472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068100824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013477756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92923224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107126863","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6265-403-7_8","title":"The Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international: Founding, Function, Future","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Netherlands yearbook of international law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Yearbook; Audience measurement; Political science; Scholarship; International law; Globe; Law; Library science; Medicine","score_opus":0.018024414603902007,"score_gpt":0.2936836945523216,"score_spread":0.27565927994841954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107126863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025546651,0.00017223612,0.000030542695,0.05107212,0.007622013,0.0002570468,0.00028714899,0.00003945546,0.9404939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15645243,0.0006316156,0.00033203553,0.0048263436,0.008741701,0.00003861964,0.00049830676,0.00008776952,0.8283912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748844,0.00006842013,0.0006536312,0.0003380129,0.0011583548,0.00029314653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969719,0.0002711631,0.0007378672,0.00029397474,0.0014512044,0.00027389653],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008099941,0.0002428187,0.00026053237,0.0002622795,0.00051927747,0.0003314196,0.0013559886,0.0004072397,0.004641144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028242404,0.0002411459,0.00020256649,0.00009467333,0.000652628,0.00044514317,0.00007886111,0.00082149083,0.00012590844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006103586,0.000018593923,0.00028148998,0.00000718719,0.00047751106,0.000007715124,0.002140638,0.0000068908885,0.000007727191,0.96331966,0.032540202,0.0011313283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022662226,0.000038459097,0.00018956941,0.000090069436,0.000049910326,0.0000057941133,0.00051576924,0.000023845136,0.000010258179,0.06818436,0.93046343,0.00020190285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28876433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8451486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89792323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015209359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002936178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99626875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110684112","doi":"","title":"Law Schools, Clinical Legal Education, and the Pandemic Portal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Pandemic; Legal education; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.0472514389283841,"score_gpt":0.4171659212731266,"score_spread":0.36991448234474256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110684112","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015282881,0.0008013802,0.0000519276,0.60685915,0.00073403894,0.00026260797,0.0000012380494,0.00009285725,0.3759139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9526181,0.00048190026,0.00014138005,0.04180172,0.0020894862,0.000025358853,0.0000058426513,0.0000064354585,0.0028297252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987562,0.0004035651,0.00026276885,0.00018215257,0.00017896917,0.00021634759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913764,0.0003137756,0.00011869273,0.00012856477,0.00012458883,0.00017675926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011516276,0.00006295849,0.000107444845,0.0000123893815,0.00067412225,0.00027221552,0.00021256626,0.0000742033,0.00047763126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021456836,0.000048005724,0.000047346763,0.00033563757,0.00040858024,0.0004914185,0.000022813683,0.00077766634,0.000104835344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002425918,0.00002845997,0.0023382506,0.0000010243136,0.000013444129,9.2944774e-8,0.0016224281,1.417507e-7,0.0000055154283,0.91409355,0.07878149,0.0030913055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030149278,0.00002637517,0.0006218543,0.0000017725273,0.000019881716,0.000002588153,0.0026222162,0.000009075556,0.000002368905,0.011010252,0.9853154,0.00006674823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003591336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032042607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93733525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003449016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047343997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83986217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110971923","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5301137","title":"Law School Assessment Revisited","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.016047237957281933,"score_gpt":0.40229726757775885,"score_spread":0.38625002962047694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110971923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003494883,0.0007766671,0.0058704684,0.16186005,0.0006686293,0.0001352763,6.466754e-7,0.00004990061,0.8271435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95301104,0.0018162121,0.00028937374,0.0040981458,0.00040432665,0.0000061356577,0.0000025390539,0.000004485113,0.040367723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828994,0.00025642506,0.0001985771,0.00009580256,0.0002351993,0.0009240247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999348,0.00010984864,0.00010985119,0.00010366978,0.00025851236,0.000070133814],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035127325,0.00005653453,0.000075034666,0.00011300549,0.0011523544,0.00034744517,0.00022117248,0.00005472453,0.0005276503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056158117,0.000054156513,0.000047301994,0.00071489305,0.00006874889,0.0006176305,0.000013235638,0.002422473,0.000081446866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003570916,0.000038197824,0.0010250619,0.0000010972209,0.000042878986,2.4128067e-7,0.00023495317,8.7833797e-7,0.000024750672,0.98925954,0.0048624235,0.004506387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011781053,0.00001357971,0.00045327403,0.000009565337,0.000014809477,0.0000040099653,0.0058568036,0.0000022050613,0.000003278218,0.39067024,0.6028108,0.00004362411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022180746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007325896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9495162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016932172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022295054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111052694","doi":"","title":"Making Something New: Legal Education in a Pandemic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Political science; Public relations; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.10403050436640075,"score_gpt":0.4518463399978851,"score_spread":0.3478158356314843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111052694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06540896,0.0007723074,0.0011883794,0.48900983,0.0010022375,0.00034963174,5.295228e-7,0.0002132714,0.44205487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806246,0.00006861786,0.0010437802,0.012312257,0.0014193145,0.000011084478,0.000003929203,0.000007896948,0.0045085126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905694,0.00014908542,0.00017270148,0.00016549365,0.0001763918,0.0002793626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995719,0.00012766242,0.00008458366,0.00007986536,0.000051322,0.0000846324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042642382,0.00005790695,0.000074940945,0.00007717188,0.00022169302,0.0001821907,0.000183956,0.000068106325,0.0004906646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001174499,0.000066282315,0.000025112568,0.00089374225,0.00003209187,0.0007768744,0.000014519234,0.0005806518,0.00010807938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021265329,0.00008071969,0.005981226,0.0000057523416,0.000008469785,4.2743164e-7,0.031065475,0.000020036583,0.0012548794,0.8161254,0.062283136,0.0831532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098870565,0.000018488901,0.00094706885,0.000008174158,0.0000045191464,7.32761e-7,0.0025867145,0.00003994212,0.00002867305,0.0065572546,0.98962367,0.00008589405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066553997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006985335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9273405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028157711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010951022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111650507","doi":"10.1186/s12875-020-01339-y","title":"Legal needs of patients attending an urban family practice in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: an observational study of a legal health clinic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Family Practice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University; Impact","funders":"Ontario Trillium Foundation","keywords":"Medicine; Observational study; Family medicine; Poverty; Health care; Logistic regression; Intervention (counseling); Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.2564503065783359,"score_gpt":0.4328576868650489,"score_spread":0.176407380286713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111650507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9559736,0.00007484952,0.00006689753,0.0152096925,0.0009372216,0.0011357262,0.000045423774,0.00003954274,0.026517048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752915,0.000026463798,0.004190682,0.019524036,0.0002546985,0.00004239226,0.00011756114,0.000028204942,0.00052446587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928765,0.0031241397,0.0015229083,0.0004456724,0.0015687102,0.00046206394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917554,0.0035498862,0.0021211398,0.0004329772,0.0017387283,0.00040186185],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040889876,0.0002372162,0.00047611553,0.00023711854,0.0005034604,0.00021035467,0.0005766378,0.00012171706,0.000119805176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014788964,0.00027088998,0.000052421135,0.0023419042,0.00011849868,0.010097192,0.00006425117,0.0010322174,0.000008801644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013611414,0.009263873,0.53149664,0.00005861009,0.00011003945,0.000012461571,0.4073641,0.0003233944,0.0000618709,0.022106774,0.027151683,0.0006893735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082061504,0.0007391235,0.3212411,0.000011521768,0.00004836083,6.489534e-7,0.30423453,0.000038866016,0.000001002167,0.0000051274405,0.37270603,0.0001530651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34555435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010560699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030432096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111651382","doi":"10.35631/irjsmi.25001","title":"LEGAL AND POLICY APPROACHES TOWARD REALIZATION OF THE RIGHT TO ACCESS LEGAL INFORMATION IN TANZANIA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Research Journal of Shariah Muamalat and Islam","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; Tanzania; Political science; Law; Legal research; Legislation; Constitution; Declaration; Public administration; Sociology; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.1701954998139366,"score_gpt":0.4602806771185765,"score_spread":0.2900851773046399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111651382","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33538678,0.000049499486,0.0008223369,0.5931579,0.00043284558,0.00035801253,0.000021201347,0.000008397759,0.06976305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803746,0.000147593,0.0001277961,0.0010389868,0.00046728653,0.0000045023125,0.0000032311068,0.000004146827,0.00016898525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998241,0.0002327162,0.0004338181,0.00007761281,0.0008726392,0.0001422015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984027,0.00023733656,0.00024357598,0.00005295056,0.00094549026,0.00011791421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019231088,0.00005477096,0.00010512717,0.00045792566,0.00015126579,0.00072051765,0.0004755744,0.000055073546,0.00009686144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064020543,0.000041363775,0.000028617169,0.0010370312,0.00016505478,0.004427054,0.00015822616,0.00044704025,0.000002410899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001771924,0.000062410334,0.007935729,0.000024806746,0.000034271587,0.000002323623,0.049745467,0.00013732038,0.00022604034,0.9236098,0.008536951,0.00950767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081598194,0.00015101171,0.083297,0.00012842915,0.000009994266,0.000022625187,0.012214362,0.001253122,0.0005526761,0.0108816195,0.8905489,0.0001243133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036961262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051704596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9127282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011340277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011466338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.766432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111751408","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: On The Web: Where to Find Canadian Case Law: Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; World Wide Web; Political science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.04737152299092879,"score_gpt":0.33106121221549234,"score_spread":0.28368968922456356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111751408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030277303,0.00006734739,2.5204702e-7,0.43735626,0.0023749217,0.0004081845,0.00018111503,0.00002514988,0.559284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032521136,0.00011896779,0.00011893592,0.17625144,0.0018350106,0.00013912833,0.000057398698,0.000033373963,0.78892463],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801147,0.00028442533,0.00031855179,0.0002957529,0.0005469426,0.000542882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697757,0.0012158655,0.00013760175,0.00048653624,0.000535709,0.00064671034],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006988048,0.00021138297,0.00017289042,0.00015231382,0.002078164,0.0009184624,0.00060846575,0.0002724265,0.04138144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019301525,0.00015321608,0.00004614537,0.00071333203,0.00012183471,0.0002995435,0.000027947974,0.000864876,0.001225254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.8221498e-7,0.0000055261744,0.0000052030846,0.000003795606,0.000014888891,0.00005170462,0.002015443,0.0000014074134,1.2834545e-7,0.25598875,0.7412798,0.0006329984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022965887,0.000010050519,0.000010811129,0.000034378765,0.000013158126,0.000014748581,0.016356722,0.0000020529255,0.0000013069186,0.000274085,0.9830316,0.00022817249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99998987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26110482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013392963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05496805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111844800","doi":"","title":"Universal Design in Legal Education in a Time of Covid-19","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Computer science; Virology; Political science; Business; Internet privacy; Medicine; Outbreak","score_opus":0.04233504090237689,"score_gpt":0.3785482809349264,"score_spread":0.3362132400325495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111844800","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12126012,0.00031502746,0.002551857,0.6847712,0.00031002038,0.0008929378,0.000003185035,0.00009604927,0.18979964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99258363,0.00003577663,0.00051013444,0.004528554,0.0001300084,0.000009738392,0.000005884727,0.000004277727,0.002191981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990716,0.00033277343,0.00015632033,0.000117977674,0.0001491723,0.00017217197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949455,0.00022790104,0.00007777012,0.000064324035,0.000045823366,0.000089602516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005626659,0.00004223632,0.000077632656,0.00010636968,0.00006536934,0.00003695181,0.0001839411,0.0000520405,0.0007333227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014208361,0.00004989383,0.000015739486,0.00111296,0.00006176576,0.00039627345,0.000010098595,0.00024855332,0.000057181496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019611712,0.0005575551,0.005062692,0.00001855529,0.000011040817,0.0000021200865,0.05690439,0.00043303095,0.0032765558,0.8462484,0.08344988,0.003839665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032276163,0.00007925396,0.00088485074,0.0000054066404,0.0000046939763,4.3720638e-7,0.003964224,0.00019592841,0.00019084335,0.0035003866,0.9907579,0.00009332024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0119279465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035157583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90730804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042890213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017731845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99465173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111986684","doi":"","title":"An Essential Service: Public Libraries and their Role in Law and Society","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Law; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Service (business); Sociology; Law library; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Business; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.027145581499950288,"score_gpt":0.30052115540199287,"score_spread":0.2733755739020426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111986684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5263171,0.0005304196,0.000060656523,0.35346812,0.00023906177,0.00026928025,0.000022946562,0.00017481111,0.11891758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962871,0.00005722368,0.0005693853,0.0359598,0.0003946806,0.000012339839,0.000017233038,0.000008580792,0.00010975825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999132,0.0001657201,0.00014816097,0.0002165443,0.0001338308,0.00020377568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935967,0.00011484412,0.00005845313,0.00010968118,0.00008695954,0.00027039362],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036140863,0.00008476549,0.00010335462,0.000016375545,0.0006337645,0.001174857,0.00016353803,0.00009631937,0.00048738587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014207294,0.000080716825,0.000019758583,0.0005378973,0.00031924626,0.0033549832,0.00005332207,0.00032316856,0.000027118987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005839629,0.00004760564,0.003121819,0.000012048141,0.000009551623,3.784839e-7,0.050729193,8.682195e-7,0.0005127044,0.9436007,0.0015075732,0.00045170548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000289615,0.000023497481,0.0024441667,0.0000064156325,0.000005597873,7.56189e-7,0.055140056,0.00021722267,0.00027847732,0.015389582,0.92604476,0.00015987066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010806044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021774769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92821115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018037821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000373568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112025018","doi":"","title":"The Covid-19 Pandemic, Accommodations and Legal Education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political science; Medicine; Virology; Outbreak; Disease","score_opus":0.09376631440134275,"score_gpt":0.43159947902198215,"score_spread":0.3378331646206394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112025018","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067486605,0.0006163914,0.00046495267,0.8806691,0.00035367333,0.00022455049,0.0000020910254,0.00011042799,0.11081016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561946,0.0007153539,0.00014096132,0.036538374,0.0008806097,0.00005226849,0.00001432428,0.0000060427806,0.0054575135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999184,0.000200726,0.00012948195,0.00013436706,0.00014665921,0.00020473555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990235,0.0005035086,0.000079181205,0.000110376575,0.000087027925,0.00019641624],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049842964,0.000051654006,0.00004824439,0.000020977937,0.0017106909,0.00038383278,0.00019263345,0.0000455265,0.00025138241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027801406,0.000043293545,0.0000185731,0.00043736937,0.00015970011,0.0004752147,0.000020298417,0.0003267178,0.00005486867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074449554,0.000022249567,0.0013886846,0.0000017767649,0.0000072879575,4.4206317e-8,0.003397391,0.000001560508,0.00009371548,0.86304945,0.12101154,0.011018875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006600585,0.000016144137,0.00036043418,4.8381474e-7,0.000008276061,0.0000024564497,0.0025147898,0.000016668651,0.000004723266,0.0069926684,0.98996013,0.000057238427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002822179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005498022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9494459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017018965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064171706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112187591","doi":"","title":"RECONCILIATION AND ETHICAL LAWYERING","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Indigenous; Conversation; Accountability; Commission; Political science; Public relations; Legal education; Legal ethics; Sociology; Law; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.061333698396253473,"score_gpt":0.3916847040508593,"score_spread":0.33035100565460584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112187591","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002693615,0.005600311,7.008533e-7,0.7518142,0.00022511926,0.00025849987,0.0000013755207,0.000009100967,0.23939711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86252475,0.019578867,0.00007096549,0.108905084,0.00015017329,0.000016681915,0.000004631149,0.000005249702,0.008743631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994929,0.00018017134,0.00008156417,0.000058376296,0.00008818588,0.00009881863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956363,0.00012482231,0.000034614626,0.00010110672,0.00007166966,0.000104134844],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015964216,0.000026327834,0.000053280186,0.000017319255,0.00036685955,0.000078486424,0.00008188731,0.000048562644,0.0024362314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009329306,0.00002025287,0.000011759059,0.00019255313,0.000049897164,0.000098447745,0.000004068321,0.00027765907,0.00066714775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.7736429e-7,6.8621887e-7,0.00055965275,0.000070002,0.0000029418743,1.5763469e-7,0.0022610975,1.0865917e-7,0.0000015122512,0.9468995,0.02739674,0.022807475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011295215,0.0000017000722,0.0011170764,0.000116783245,0.0000063234856,8.3672137e-7,0.00018547013,0.000001993684,3.0339564e-7,0.0006270824,0.99790037,0.000030750925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29846308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7012523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012235124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012512453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112273460","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i0.6561","title":"The 2010 Amendments and Hryniak v Mauldin: The Perspective of the Lawyers Who Have Lived Them","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Perception; Psychology; History; Art","score_opus":0.12529564303135415,"score_gpt":0.399644406971222,"score_spread":0.27434876393986785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112273460","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10668098,0.00016054054,0.000043440887,0.6364036,0.00061375875,0.0008362482,0.000018185396,0.000019990273,0.25522327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896516,0.00010330613,0.000066977336,0.005701137,0.00027534278,0.00001828705,2.968498e-7,0.000008402046,0.004174628],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989038,0.00021469823,0.00019232754,0.00015078823,0.00038035156,0.00015803854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983601,0.0007432787,0.00023309041,0.00022538847,0.00036254013,0.000075601594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000528645,0.00007733093,0.00010237606,0.000019591474,0.0007052216,0.00023968729,0.00078844884,0.000045532415,0.00019678168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020316774,0.000043077052,0.00004198859,0.0004298165,0.0004966716,0.00047150985,0.00017568587,0.0002779248,0.000019713934],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002903845,0.00015854664,0.0068436987,0.00007274965,0.00021621243,8.930832e-7,0.43693796,0.000097724245,0.001192691,0.42489615,0.12667412,0.002618879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041065965,0.00008884713,0.047244813,0.00006848214,0.00034527862,9.5164154e-7,0.4085888,0.0001554721,0.002059468,0.0036060251,0.53720796,0.00022325698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033609704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048947235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88297063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004332445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034005402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54240656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112291208","doi":"","title":"Teaching Essentially: Emergencies, Flight Instruction, and The Law School Classroom","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Law; Pedagogy; Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0199334529363735,"score_gpt":0.31698481750168755,"score_spread":0.29705136456531406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112291208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009301205,0.00044167307,0.00048401195,0.66054416,0.00063191046,0.00022614915,0.0000013173452,0.0001094483,0.32826015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98386294,0.00019706434,0.00023905697,0.011303015,0.0015335819,0.000018062894,0.0000047982735,0.000007751753,0.0028337056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988694,0.00034490082,0.00017321501,0.00016308948,0.00021368323,0.00023570647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947315,0.00012898329,0.00009274892,0.000112880174,0.000081722996,0.00011050315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006306661,0.00006813195,0.000085224594,0.000018723864,0.0015111972,0.0002552648,0.00019889777,0.000054835382,0.00074833434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008864326,0.00005303422,0.00003279198,0.00034749391,0.00028897182,0.00056151126,0.000029508465,0.00066732,0.00007399479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019697962,0.000011110923,0.00007583958,0.0000023267235,0.000018886145,9.722478e-8,0.007356008,8.547656e-7,0.0003985672,0.9714108,0.019569123,0.0011366887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032084092,0.000015253972,0.00006010074,0.000001555146,0.000018524817,0.000001097546,0.0025984794,0.00003990311,0.000065845525,0.01313746,0.9836683,0.00007258964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009040991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054896157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97456175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006682293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008682717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112509775","doi":"","title":"Narrative, Interrupted: Reflections on a First Semester as a New Law Professor Like no Other","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Law; Sociology; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.09966629206398467,"score_gpt":0.4360195255813699,"score_spread":0.3363532335173852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112509775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019298373,0.000024397737,0.0000445853,0.42547345,0.00054925645,0.0002534846,0.0000012310398,0.00013110241,0.5715927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7934947,0.000022882692,0.00031735553,0.10218419,0.0019925795,0.00007468363,0.000007547324,0.00002564874,0.101880394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987847,0.0001833648,0.00018863416,0.00025957622,0.00023771914,0.0003459587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921,0.0001498306,0.00010872137,0.00016618041,0.00014616088,0.00021908514],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018128264,0.00011254709,0.00010991129,0.000043925145,0.0010053046,0.00021170755,0.00023349353,0.00010009699,0.0043954467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074784196,0.00010816014,0.000056016557,0.000726268,0.00010168875,0.0004972582,0.000020833617,0.0006475325,0.0018250459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080835955,0.00010713451,0.000018320083,0.0000037550199,0.000035451165,4.667396e-7,0.11965328,0.0000030185222,0.0002772725,0.50615543,0.37344688,0.000218126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020089913,0.00030502392,0.000010283674,0.000013399606,0.000010515692,7.644624e-7,0.005206919,0.0000073844403,0.000120988814,0.0016654836,0.9923289,0.00012945231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008337072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04725961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7915649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001965842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018555236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112584853","doi":"10.32920/22229509","title":"Towards Implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action in Law Schools: A Settler Harm Reduction Approach to Racial Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Indigenous Peoples and Indigenous Legal Orders in Canadian Legal Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canadian Bar Association; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Indigenous; Prejudice (legal term); Political science; Harm; Law; Commission; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07295356932481475,"score_gpt":0.3892679816070466,"score_spread":0.3163144122822319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112584853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94399744,0.00009761759,0.00012734675,0.03949549,0.0013947103,0.0024877277,0.000041200776,0.000061589104,0.012296869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539685,0.00022818705,0.0014457499,0.001196152,0.00041004943,0.00045320645,0.00016998306,0.000027554095,0.0006722818],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973416,0.0005228775,0.00056026125,0.0006354907,0.00034814127,0.0005916471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986429,0.00021334914,0.00026247962,0.00022100205,0.00027674861,0.00038350545],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003225614,0.00024098644,0.00025730382,0.0008792,0.0014735926,0.0015312486,0.00021017827,0.0002936829,0.000017131133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001666855,0.0002405261,0.000024994399,0.0011244309,0.000099545476,0.0011106792,0.00018114419,0.001054534,0.0000050809035],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086690714,0.00020501329,0.011578166,0.00023721435,0.000060742634,0.0000015856499,0.83693844,0.00044523046,0.00009413172,0.032337435,0.0017945227,0.11622082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050522573,0.00006056174,0.11556877,0.0003464085,0.00005804109,0.000013742469,0.68703914,0.00023891298,0.00004110626,0.0012225051,0.19410393,0.0008016718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9489912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96061313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1923094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014126879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010485858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112636103","doi":"","title":"Analyzing the Effects of Covid-19 on Legal Pedagogy and Scholarship: A Hurly-Burly in Five-And-a-Half Parts (A Collage Within a Collage?)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Higher education; Visual arts; Art; Sociology; Aesthetics; Pedagogy; Political science; Medicine; Law; Virology","score_opus":0.03317516120939109,"score_gpt":0.38579000321101936,"score_spread":0.3526148420016283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112636103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7579148,0.00117756,0.00003777356,0.23303922,0.00016434121,0.0006016308,0.0000029300704,0.00004153157,0.0070202327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370176,0.00023064064,0.000058466445,0.0051236763,0.00014974081,0.0000409667,0.0000028097666,0.000009180198,0.0006827635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982439,0.0007037949,0.00025243367,0.00026299566,0.00023720313,0.00029966288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794704,0.0014687605,0.00018662837,0.00014071827,0.000073783274,0.00018305064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011663263,0.00010778004,0.00018473255,0.000090860354,0.0005194926,0.00021955372,0.00019962329,0.000089357316,0.00006253064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007251371,0.00009165076,0.000029933144,0.0010947054,0.00023974755,0.00040235868,0.000035497033,0.00056869147,0.000006802145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033988588,0.00020108525,0.013622968,0.00017737495,0.00008758364,0.000020185116,0.14246507,0.00007056738,0.0058546322,0.8295593,0.005712926,0.0018883726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021115514,0.001223899,0.011629449,0.000079936864,0.00011203166,0.000008629567,0.013890382,0.0002225422,0.001561252,0.0076233298,0.96108276,0.00045421056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051645236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015776576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9553699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015247914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031128153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88036996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114099894","doi":"10.7202/1071576ar","title":"The Good Life of Teaching: An Ethics of Professional Practice (Chris Higgins)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Engineering ethics; Professional ethics; Medical education; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.12649509721241825,"score_gpt":0.47395778231008034,"score_spread":0.3474626850976621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114099894","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017814705,0.00011584811,0.00046051052,0.8915503,0.0005388192,0.00018919395,0.000010298427,0.000040346313,0.08927996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863885,0.000102966245,0.0030593786,0.009590755,0.00031705498,0.000010482535,0.00000442312,0.0000065877402,0.0005198243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760675,0.0013098269,0.00029746513,0.00011357769,0.00054998265,0.00012237152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939137,0.0048041185,0.00042118126,0.00016107835,0.00057395746,0.00012597804],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043456415,0.00005292375,0.000093635244,0.000025871648,0.00087025185,0.00005993309,0.00029303046,0.00009659991,0.00021548971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06337526,0.000040047376,0.00003796729,0.0004246958,0.00020649466,0.0007645467,0.000038097347,0.0008005082,0.000019557614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045803732,0.00029203502,0.0019425534,0.000023467868,0.00003959155,2.2749616e-7,0.20649692,0.0000051960433,0.0003696308,0.7557672,0.030356368,0.0046609575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074596035,0.000043836677,0.0011273227,0.000009655104,0.00002807036,1.6393571e-7,0.09669682,0.000057415138,0.00010591409,0.0010830354,0.9007201,0.000053061336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062580523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060084864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019359624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021334447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9460345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114586317","doi":"10.7202/1073426ar","title":"Is There Something to be Said for Getting No Respect? Comment on J.R. Coombs's \"Respect for Law: An Educational Object?\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.15848349894968095,"score_gpt":0.4477603968861283,"score_spread":0.28927689793644734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114586317","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006651424,0.000033053333,0.0012194484,0.92402005,0.00065461773,0.0010149844,0.0001191122,0.000083206745,0.06620408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5575466,0.000010704833,0.024367929,0.41202646,0.0027709517,0.00051740505,0.00007253614,0.000035858935,0.0026515762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984745,0.00020703401,0.0002882147,0.00035377278,0.00035873707,0.00031773857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620265,0.0026678515,0.00015811245,0.00019971105,0.00052960706,0.00024204497],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014921033,0.00012573613,0.00015282603,0.00008304929,0.0013952439,0.0004185623,0.0003101082,0.00007780796,0.0013088917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00649999,0.00013054667,0.00009633888,0.0004834287,0.000058142243,0.0005438561,0.000029286532,0.0002104008,0.00013611426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010649093,0.00017201903,0.00019210321,0.000026666636,0.00003474745,1.2431626e-7,0.06848102,0.000014739624,0.000336767,0.5744925,0.35395518,0.0021876588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024086608,0.00021616032,0.00018775783,0.00001873875,0.000023061113,1.1310999e-7,0.013007026,0.00011427056,0.0006594069,0.010348771,0.97499937,0.00018444669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038629936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017511887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6210442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021959234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075677485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115717593","doi":"","title":"Witness Protection: A Comparative Analysis of Indian and Australian Legislation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Law; Forensic psychology; Political science; Legislation; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04130882149692963,"score_gpt":0.3725990134083027,"score_spread":0.3312901919113731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115717593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96742964,0.00007580683,0.000546742,0.016415957,0.00017297768,0.00021023888,0.00000213582,0.000010535591,0.015135975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948692,0.000097765915,0.000031089505,0.000034405384,0.000084656094,0.0000035753553,0.0000030595145,0.0000019777908,0.0048743114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989423,0.00017425505,0.00017402468,0.000085145504,0.00020255514,0.00042172798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939895,0.00004884376,0.0002421795,0.000060925442,0.0002076186,0.000041468116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015052282,0.00004793638,0.00012463664,0.00030059202,0.00027079484,0.00006310294,0.00007746262,0.000048750768,0.0002393839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007025553,0.000045612815,0.000042512682,0.0014147162,0.0000863247,0.00065114285,0.0000036573895,0.00083742774,0.000011659908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024099436,0.000048122132,0.019441217,0.0000027121466,0.00053727685,1.3076189e-7,0.025633901,0.00012841934,0.00013850264,0.95111173,0.000033291348,0.0029005944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012890209,0.0005962255,0.15794618,0.00004152986,0.0010049171,0.00006637255,0.4309738,0.00046407472,0.00025220556,0.2844002,0.12242215,0.0005433445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004483015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019912334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66671157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002744274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026265238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116749468","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: WRIT 215 - Legal Research: Canadian Encyclopedic Digest","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Writ; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.20124309424553927,"score_gpt":0.45141738506806517,"score_spread":0.2501742908225259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116749468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012432567,0.00032879465,0.0000022871964,0.38772526,0.0027849637,0.000372507,0.000111283385,0.00013499758,0.6085275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011713255,0.0034069726,0.00047140036,0.021706052,0.010906141,0.000117488395,0.0007146697,0.00007949886,0.9508845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951828,0.0009396603,0.00059081253,0.0006033395,0.001583261,0.0011001081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99548954,0.0012489696,0.00017910775,0.00047443737,0.0013203698,0.0012875634],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031867211,0.0002604834,0.00031991964,0.0009230678,0.0026753442,0.0019405916,0.0012625041,0.0006915023,0.024203619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012973069,0.00026602153,0.00011527996,0.0030335025,0.0006843384,0.0014205143,0.00009884946,0.003279357,0.004789868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018091748,0.00002164141,0.00006914307,0.000017978457,0.00002258261,0.000026360884,0.006614676,1.3025449e-7,5.489692e-7,0.23584388,0.7555972,0.001784068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060410606,0.00003107648,0.000077683595,0.000052951393,0.000020022042,0.000002214745,0.015601287,0.0000012228298,0.0000017753423,0.0015338359,0.98230195,0.00031557964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97117794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9614208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3660192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009956977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056638867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117556844","doi":"10.7202/1073406ar","title":"Technology and Justice (George Grant)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Art; Law; Art history; Computer science","score_opus":0.06413063215275941,"score_gpt":0.369466850259669,"score_spread":0.3053362181069096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117556844","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05275436,0.00016632286,0.0005086995,0.78953356,0.00028369497,0.000097809905,0.0000029989021,0.00017281283,0.15647976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889765,0.00010737713,0.00121888,0.008131145,0.00023617486,0.00000830711,0.0000012587195,0.000003787161,0.0013166185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995599,0.000052622363,0.000081928585,0.00010300994,0.00009397837,0.00010856445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995946,0.00015199839,0.000038725997,0.000055354183,0.00008535932,0.00007393951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022849748,0.000034861612,0.000050884068,0.00006903694,0.0003816606,0.000066831024,0.00008605348,0.00005298831,0.0005690032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028964041,0.000035752342,0.000009886987,0.0010187275,0.00012535692,0.00024702266,0.000021426926,0.00014211825,0.00017328913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051642805,0.000026333804,0.006189145,0.000017136954,0.000011217319,0.0000020412238,0.024979359,5.135048e-7,0.0004118115,0.9125827,0.03037553,0.025399042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005491001,0.000009201016,0.0005841909,0.0000018557646,0.000025177305,5.1622965e-7,0.012732545,0.00002251506,0.000052262578,0.0030991863,0.98336565,0.00005196409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006402952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019242587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9529902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011986638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000155213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6230186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117990781","doi":"10.7202/1073282ar","title":"The Limits of Reason: Indeterminacy in Law, Education, and Morality (John A. Eisenberg)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Morality; Philosophy; Law; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.07256727998325842,"score_gpt":0.3967481582516703,"score_spread":0.3241808782684119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117990781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35444763,0.0004526655,0.000009813306,0.46563524,0.0003031067,0.00022270149,0.000003918535,0.00002552113,0.17889938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995449,0.00023893632,0.0002297025,0.0033753505,0.00013821633,0.000018336994,0.0000019113877,0.0000032322284,0.00054530555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992242,0.00022941158,0.00018963988,0.000106227424,0.00014840695,0.00010210218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906945,0.00047577108,0.00011254979,0.000106524865,0.00016363946,0.00007204314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006749549,0.000043259537,0.00007111559,0.000023994227,0.00029836595,0.00009497753,0.00013057698,0.000038762148,0.00008376069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025573869,0.000036262674,0.000016835766,0.00058160705,0.0002488745,0.0003523967,0.000018997103,0.00012942076,0.000012088933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017435295,0.000138531,0.06081027,0.000021814367,0.000009826499,3.8181872e-7,0.06346609,9.2672326e-7,0.00005937501,0.7962704,0.013619519,0.06558547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000773598,0.000012027919,0.038061608,0.000011458508,0.000008776394,3.4891806e-7,0.015864216,0.00001625825,0.00009572165,0.0040432154,0.9417432,0.00006579608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011612893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006649571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9281237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027978316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006200452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118765194","doi":"10.4324/9780203831427-9","title":"(De-)sexing the woman lawyer: Rosemary Hunter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Legal profession; Dominance (genetics); White (mutation); Law; Middle class; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.11220260628662289,"score_gpt":0.38135311026578567,"score_spread":0.2691505039791628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118765194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0153448265,0.000010901272,0.0002716472,0.05601279,0.00030721448,0.00006350056,3.1061484e-7,0.000057997066,0.92793083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93058085,0.000008034433,0.00075886707,0.012261369,0.00020908972,0.000010625641,5.1758843e-7,0.0000033734243,0.05616726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950683,0.00011130237,0.00007775669,0.00006135404,0.000105625164,0.00013711773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996319,0.000120396246,0.00003523426,0.00011158249,0.00006172986,0.00003918478],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007236699,0.000030488074,0.000027361595,0.000022326662,0.0005489329,0.00013351771,0.00016886258,0.00003004567,0.009066999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024759787,0.000020621834,0.00001942173,0.0002318783,0.00010223914,0.0004396779,0.000015075038,0.00013853016,0.00031211812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022247068,0.000040638028,0.0059029525,7.068378e-7,0.0000060299367,4.6300008e-7,0.093321875,9.179909e-8,0.000029087114,0.8314213,0.06626777,0.0030068194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026594209,0.000004718988,0.011550043,0.0000015162256,0.0000036955514,7.302996e-7,0.02448751,0.00000371351,0.0000896853,0.005946736,0.9578413,0.00004377831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012108851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023477746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91523606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031769214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025965416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121138099","doi":"10.1353/ctr.0.0031","title":"Guantánamo : Using a Play-Reading to Teach Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Embodied cognition; Charter; Reading (process); Law; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics education; Visual arts; Psychology; Art; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05754018756000266,"score_gpt":0.3973370824145781,"score_spread":0.3397968948545754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121138099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023606243,0.0032893855,0.000015938807,0.17270525,0.0011202748,0.0005546645,0.000017299863,0.000039896782,0.8198967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.864828,0.0031212051,0.003914052,0.12239304,0.0014594516,0.00006604865,0.000021094218,0.000039887094,0.004157208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991349,0.000113830625,0.0001666313,0.00014881972,0.00013152824,0.00030430057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894553,0.00008999421,0.000050251805,0.00023654921,0.000111179106,0.0005664641],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001009519,0.00007363409,0.0001297939,0.00009502669,0.0007302246,0.00014295918,0.00021918243,0.00005996612,0.0026210914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054694345,0.000072025534,0.00004243893,0.000721965,0.000069540394,0.00030391343,0.000008061807,0.0003327327,0.00046871576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.046794e-7,0.000014280552,0.0002785362,0.00010709009,0.0000123755035,0.000006078268,0.0044963,6.589737e-7,0.00013619715,0.8490732,0.060808294,0.085066415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015323209,0.000003306792,0.000028029077,0.00028232767,0.000022238713,0.000006071002,0.00036070126,0.0000019063257,0.000003499727,0.0002861967,0.99889237,0.00009803933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6287506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89268017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93808407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019953451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029301557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121174463","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4363","title":"LAWYERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE FAIRNESS OF JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Duty; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Psychology; Helpfulness; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06152644705459672,"score_gpt":0.4113544472456721,"score_spread":0.3498280001910754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121174463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86394364,0.000025505882,0.0003614227,0.015338453,0.0012263253,0.0005254598,0.00003990823,0.000030642714,0.11850862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99671316,0.0000068516383,0.0009207665,0.0006837606,0.00040907811,0.000020374955,0.0000013110814,0.000009194667,0.0012354868],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859715,0.00018677354,0.00034527184,0.0001286733,0.0005076983,0.00023442278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983445,0.00031966303,0.00027585035,0.0003182066,0.0006012873,0.00014051862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006761786,0.00007682185,0.00016422519,0.00012581103,0.00023078306,0.000047911806,0.00064165477,0.00006981532,0.0005516172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019127378,0.00006786174,0.000060586128,0.0012707334,0.00017380853,0.0008213871,0.00012713214,0.000156435,0.000040266405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019990682,0.0021901126,0.42017242,0.0004178135,0.00020599396,4.421446e-7,0.30514458,0.00021557152,0.019403787,0.19933158,0.050362565,0.0023552233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019299885,0.000030093399,0.8909233,0.00012018699,0.00024663244,4.170101e-7,0.024967005,0.000005651593,0.0045679044,0.00019255905,0.078590825,0.00016239878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045780553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008607431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4707509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059364073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048615845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6920681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121181845","doi":"","title":"The Civil Servant's Role in the Implementation of Constitutional Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Civil servant; Political science; Civil rights; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.025707573705034244,"score_gpt":0.38320730599416003,"score_spread":0.3574997322891258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121181845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48014134,0.0024420465,0.0014278573,0.3082122,0.001423916,0.0005521701,0.0000061967767,0.000021380305,0.2057729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882644,0.00028518593,0.000016622254,0.00022156855,0.00022735141,0.0000060291113,0.0000022839945,0.0000012399789,0.00041329258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985046,0.00036899833,0.00019701174,0.00004579651,0.00037276297,0.0005108525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993036,0.0002100056,0.00016194044,0.00006380627,0.0002318942,0.000028800101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00639664,0.000036408306,0.000040588922,0.000042696203,0.00073934987,0.00011667485,0.00024725308,0.000023471262,0.00005413057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021899866,0.000021147702,0.000024056055,0.0003629819,0.00024470338,0.00044742326,0.000006369967,0.0007988613,0.000012141142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000640374,0.00002254449,0.0024813642,1.516351e-7,0.0000109805915,1.3019705e-7,0.010457071,0.0000042517163,0.0000055813352,0.9837866,0.0011511495,0.0020737767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018798922,0.000025996458,0.0009121022,0.0000014302148,0.0000056161266,0.000017038026,0.15979536,0.0000024607873,0.000007933782,0.49483636,0.34418258,0.000025136862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073565193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22565281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5186851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042143645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013142453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121384998","doi":"10.15496/publikation-53410","title":"Barriers to the profession : inaction in Ontario, Canada and its consequences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Diversity (politics); Limiting; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02340221597623582,"score_gpt":0.29007355610050634,"score_spread":0.2666713401242705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121384998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80013114,0.000026575388,0.0000066745883,0.14108711,0.00040353223,0.00036365705,0.0000020161012,0.000014385009,0.057964884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98599666,0.000028967439,0.000058312326,0.0025781866,0.00003123193,0.0000086612245,0.0000016638503,0.0000027906965,0.011293513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999288,0.0001602185,0.00008234844,0.00011893848,0.00018652601,0.00016391928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994295,0.0001409722,0.000051021572,0.00007755428,0.00013667166,0.00016425143],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003394557,0.000051920462,0.000051873474,0.00044896727,0.00066108006,0.00014986654,0.00016900359,0.000038676535,0.0042498554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040648525,0.000042925287,0.000006926958,0.0018307448,0.00006012204,0.0013488284,0.000032817115,0.00021525279,0.000034203913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004156142,0.000038509028,0.20095363,0.000010930994,0.000045852303,0.000012481222,0.24535492,0.00005376747,0.0011947384,0.2141597,0.3344218,0.003712116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008476982,0.000009828699,0.02909042,0.000013302877,0.000005459924,7.1296125e-7,0.10049073,0.000011956815,0.000056889126,0.000324081,0.8698267,0.00008516546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99878234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53540486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009351611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006130338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121398693","doi":"10.5703/1288284317168","title":"Wrangling Weirdness: Lessons Learned from Academic Law Library Collections","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Negotiation; Law library; Computer science; Face (sociological concept); Academic library; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Public relations; Business; Law; Political science; Library science; Sociology","score_opus":0.25928821702218807,"score_gpt":0.429889893641421,"score_spread":0.17060167661923292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121398693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015846734,0.000044799763,0.0003364056,0.48051667,0.00025694005,0.000076327546,0.000010574528,0.00027337865,0.51690024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8988825,0.00029368055,0.0018147335,0.046135016,0.0014560076,0.000026288011,0.000040680625,0.000018049628,0.051333018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911237,0.00016544542,0.00017586099,0.00019155377,0.00018870276,0.00016604272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991752,0.000434801,0.00006991709,0.000087853965,0.000057865956,0.00017440073],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001512377,0.00006351041,0.0000832353,0.000043947228,0.0013092534,0.0003604324,0.00021890161,0.00012097374,0.010326038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067514996,0.00006526778,0.00003717748,0.0015879609,0.00012555791,0.0016606038,0.00003362479,0.00055823574,0.0005176446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000816928,0.000023352783,0.00030259218,0.00000131756,0.000013300428,5.8868096e-7,0.023459058,0.00001022759,0.00014377391,0.7702083,0.20447433,0.0013550116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010343124,0.000006173109,0.00005755944,0.0000041016733,0.000011469397,8.6967546e-8,0.018415423,0.00009525547,0.00027943213,0.017676476,0.96326035,0.00009026437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009497078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012614491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89729786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025618021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080283725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121400957","doi":"","title":"SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES AND JUDICIAL ROLE: THE SCAFFOLDING FOR EXPANDED THINKING ABOUT JUDICIAL ETHICS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Mediation; Political science; Judicial opinion; Settlement (finance); Action (physics); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.10485530194972174,"score_gpt":0.4058283538600859,"score_spread":0.30097305191036416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121400957","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012961719,0.017630693,0.00002144324,0.92993635,0.0005453412,0.0016921198,0.000022567341,0.000020129071,0.048835192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8528147,0.028520744,0.00030084877,0.11606732,0.0010839149,0.00044450385,0.000023885354,0.0000138171545,0.0007303185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868965,0.00042266847,0.00021878238,0.00012279919,0.0002665022,0.00027962256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984627,0.0007703637,0.00013786966,0.00015834135,0.00031612,0.0001546441],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039283237,0.000080449485,0.00013090514,0.000034605375,0.003573519,0.0005336804,0.00034489544,0.000071235154,0.0013181152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019335835,0.00004984709,0.000038411537,0.00026738792,0.0002925447,0.00026264018,0.000017949891,0.00035658974,0.00006509528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.027339e-7,0.0000034327993,0.00015781091,0.00006087651,0.000018028406,9.9434224e-8,0.018293507,1.5401763e-7,0.0000019097445,0.87150896,0.058862887,0.051091723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004598895,0.0000068938734,0.0008793255,0.00030182162,0.000051670122,8.3726576e-7,0.0045738714,0.000009547186,0.0000015732179,0.026504291,0.9675453,0.000078910045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5216202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76235074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9086824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000127505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004175739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121411357","doi":"","title":"Safe and Inclusive Schools – Expensive … Quality Education – Priceless, for Everything Else There's Lawyers!","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Quality (philosophy); Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.07027031261388826,"score_gpt":0.44703120078446124,"score_spread":0.37676088817057296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121411357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29689005,0.002208526,0.00079322484,0.055732157,0.0026108357,0.0017732455,0.000025392217,0.00020395282,0.63976264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96962136,0.00030945617,0.0034984169,0.0020063482,0.0012662653,0.00025062787,0.0000395258,0.000025118363,0.02298291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811,0.00044485033,0.00041046017,0.000391618,0.00028281004,0.00036023662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966659,0.0010281478,0.00032185443,0.00028720396,0.0014664407,0.0002304668],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001274269,0.00018004268,0.000239358,0.00013580605,0.002450873,0.00022431502,0.00026340297,0.00018488058,0.00027599675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041226055,0.00018736307,0.000076152086,0.00065421325,0.00031187586,0.001497205,0.00008313407,0.00040173822,0.00023972701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007672212,0.0007164965,0.0044420115,0.00008080272,0.00006985691,0.0000012208458,0.16476876,0.0000017110152,0.0005984051,0.68565786,0.1106227,0.03296344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038630574,0.00002902305,0.0062497286,0.00003617444,0.00002350996,0.000005503242,0.03592184,0.000010118879,0.00024924954,0.006888317,0.9499202,0.00028003234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003477349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033357856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8392975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003187371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044530123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121471502","doi":"","title":"No Toilets in Park","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Curriculum; Sociology; Theme (computing); Pedagogy; Politics; Legal education; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04796488995796207,"score_gpt":0.36687485666668146,"score_spread":0.3189099667087194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121471502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015492456,0.00079838454,0.000007257781,0.25149846,0.0046324893,0.000052044146,0.0000097697275,0.000009706466,0.7414426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92877066,0.0008893202,0.0023639912,0.008312373,0.004244922,0.0000041624344,0.0000017703126,0.000012388884,0.05540044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983458,0.0003788803,0.00042600196,0.00012522729,0.0003372643,0.0003868241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897283,0.00021738716,0.00022154873,0.00010059563,0.00028949106,0.00019816088],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014049186,0.00010077739,0.0001234104,0.00007805991,0.002662282,0.00022924728,0.00021258974,0.0001315783,0.013959481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047955776,0.00010521463,0.00006671132,0.00061846036,0.00021656428,0.0020733594,0.00001863388,0.0012009969,0.0036888998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008214633,0.00027889706,0.00018722069,0.000003861482,0.000012914658,0.00001483695,0.0016256494,0.00006196696,0.000007822363,0.8976375,0.028506493,0.07165464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002540387,0.000026347632,0.00036443802,0.0000491842,0.000011152566,0.00007620408,0.0008447599,0.00004737111,0.000022758577,0.002002191,0.99617046,0.00013108566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011835901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08281024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.967664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045717045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014130182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121492773","doi":"10.21991/c97m23","title":"On The Trinity Western University Controversy: An Argument for a Christian Law School in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.030378373017318522,"score_gpt":0.2897247159256101,"score_spread":0.2593463429082916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121492773","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15058383,0.000092392766,0.017760342,0.52224016,0.0044213687,0.005249578,0.00095063064,0.00017132291,0.29853037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868541,0.00001060579,0.00016170766,0.012003148,0.000111362475,0.00011772085,0.000080232225,0.0000045295974,0.00065660675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816805,0.00021753681,0.0003271215,0.0003185078,0.00042271297,0.00054607604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772775,0.0010523072,0.00017201938,0.00027232285,0.0004762104,0.00029937012],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055986905,0.0001755388,0.00018324159,0.00011586454,0.0026725144,0.00023296378,0.00040130777,0.00009941064,0.001255959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014227908,0.00015763314,0.00007528242,0.00042516252,0.0022162816,0.0014962615,0.00004011814,0.0003936381,0.00015322716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050864837,0.00011749349,0.0093730325,0.0000031205761,0.000023961355,0.0000031381726,0.00018964475,0.00022878514,0.000008376573,0.9697208,0.020136792,0.00014399017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015498258,0.000049965918,0.003578685,0.000049408165,0.000024013285,0.000006930446,0.03342953,0.00025868302,0.0000210956,0.033949234,0.9267537,0.00032890035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8927444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9686084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9357716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020602774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019976549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121499518","doi":"","title":"Canadian Civil Justice: Relief in Small and Simple Matters in an Age of Efficiency","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Austerity; Political science; Optimism; Public administration; Civil procedure; Law; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.019052548313989445,"score_gpt":0.32477865651340987,"score_spread":0.3057261081994204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121499518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9249351,0.0001648129,0.00019566581,0.06913513,0.00013793222,0.000081877166,0.000001912278,0.0000048032016,0.0053427787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791217,0.00070827635,0.000029166576,0.00061156304,0.000074151525,0.000001968323,0.0000010383555,0.00000484566,0.0006568132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985287,0.00017333744,0.00020643054,0.00009393879,0.00010322287,0.00089434005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953526,0.00012797804,0.00009040734,0.0000668248,0.00006510691,0.00011443011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002396253,0.000048837654,0.00007561342,0.00029514523,0.0001805312,0.000053716103,0.00015275262,0.000050543666,0.0001101427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043452295,0.00004019728,0.000012472342,0.0004460552,0.00007747345,0.00040540335,0.0000058836235,0.0006396334,0.0000052245964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028048655,0.00019021117,0.10188328,0.000009530353,0.000012509647,0.000012464954,0.026297048,0.000014376341,0.0012028909,0.84246373,0.0005025354,0.0273834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024210182,0.0005392217,0.13262792,0.00014131269,0.000054115688,0.000081353755,0.13720264,0.000030871575,0.000050518116,0.55359554,0.17266195,0.0005935378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34151974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99121624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64969647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011710156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009650766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121584940","doi":"","title":"Legal Feminism and the Post-Racism Fantasy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Scholarship; Oppression; Feminism; Colonialism; Sociology; Gender studies; Intersectionality; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.020197843148441443,"score_gpt":0.2799167041765076,"score_spread":0.2597188610280662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121584940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016420072,9.21162e-7,0.00025126658,0.02944155,0.00042966974,0.00030367242,0.00000566916,0.00008960083,0.9530576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98663384,0.009580185,0.00037338678,0.0019904308,0.00023784713,0.000002329007,0.0000074168065,0.0000084213,0.0011661751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987503,0.0005043957,0.000105427265,0.0002000614,0.00021844404,0.00022136341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882275,0.0005899295,0.00011164189,0.0002045299,0.0002018229,0.000069327594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082704664,0.000096305324,0.00011410331,0.0018923748,0.0010308682,0.0002548692,0.00030463576,0.000082351544,0.000094397925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007607642,0.00008006349,0.00005175924,0.00395006,0.0004713455,0.0009683181,0.00007473919,0.00031867067,0.000046792527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068106936,0.000047112168,0.00014703743,0.000004303245,0.000021591426,0.000004248821,0.058684908,4.4887756e-7,0.00000193076,0.91936624,0.0010428043,0.020611273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007152836,0.000024649224,0.00020313392,0.000005246948,0.00003783255,0.000003872812,0.011408838,0.000032526485,0.000011258077,0.00002425452,0.9874175,0.00011559845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24942064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0472568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9863747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007647236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008425475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9701283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121619201","doi":"10.11575/sppp.v4i0.42359","title":"Rhetoric and Realities: What Independence of the Bar Requires of Lawyer Regulation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Independence (probability theory); Bar (unit); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Physics; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.383449993403467,"score_gpt":0.6198468659399735,"score_spread":0.23639687253650649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121619201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9034653,0.0040324824,0.000050127113,0.011168963,0.0019108596,0.00046119862,0.000018901354,0.000011163294,0.07888105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878026,0.009559674,0.00007462076,0.00014672545,0.00014962055,0.00000898121,0.0000012870688,0.000009089254,0.0022474048],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979259,0.00040155396,0.00056268676,0.00017268561,0.00078307185,0.00015409855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996128,0.0004987704,0.0019516983,0.00054876914,0.00078902766,0.000083693034],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029031439,0.00009980725,0.00027510204,0.00019703955,0.0010431925,0.002045955,0.001981574,0.00010200431,0.0035573328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032805523,0.00007904545,0.00006697008,0.00045566197,0.00064756424,0.011005771,0.00038968053,0.00027352036,0.0000019191302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013646125,0.0002953862,0.72902715,0.00016272842,0.00016930957,0.0000015172171,0.027960457,0.000036853882,0.021962557,0.14487338,0.038271893,0.03710227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016660431,0.0000041777203,0.8846013,0.0004145322,0.00004037451,0.0000014635687,0.0043601426,0.0000084449775,0.0067697833,0.03166939,0.07183192,0.00013185553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020000268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010333756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15557413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005977976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064478273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121658135","doi":"","title":"FINDING A PATH TO RECONCILIATION: MANDATORY INDIGENOUS LAW, ANISHINAABE PEDAGOGY, AND ACADEMIC FREEDOM","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Jurisprudence; Commission; Constitution; Academic freedom; Political science; Subject (documents); Sociology; Law reform; Higher education","score_opus":0.11775137750545771,"score_gpt":0.4637681197493144,"score_spread":0.3460167422438567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121658135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41641435,0.00010790646,0.00016865255,0.109280236,0.0013149852,0.0003877609,0.000012577601,0.00009127,0.47222227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839664,0.00014815056,0.0015175954,0.0032757,0.0005965542,0.000023363136,0.000003935997,0.00000669984,0.010461607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999159,0.00007687966,0.00016180096,0.00018312343,0.00020821567,0.00021099881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916196,0.00014628694,0.00015587431,0.00023636827,0.00014040853,0.00015910772],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001202787,0.000066497494,0.00008226454,0.000032519423,0.003612234,0.00070132146,0.0003108263,0.00012335353,0.00071886904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014325511,0.00006738582,0.00001563252,0.00010202788,0.00018471411,0.0015658921,0.000062412546,0.00031719328,0.00016012322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000106132975,0.00003738901,0.05013344,0.000010349342,0.00001495443,0.0000026311436,0.12971865,6.960559e-7,0.00012088056,0.77303183,0.025748398,0.021170158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013866503,0.00002394639,0.04692881,0.0000121082585,0.000008517162,0.0000018079267,0.012738563,0.000004178833,0.00003691255,0.0024219195,0.93754727,0.00013728616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022165682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027532939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9117989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095631585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068927044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99768496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121688782","doi":"","title":"Constructivism, Embedded Liberalism and Anti-Dumping - Canadian Public Interest Inquiry as Case Study of Embedded Liberalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Constructivism (international relations); Political science; Economic liberalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Political economy; Philosophy; Law; Politics; International relations","score_opus":0.11531810960615771,"score_gpt":0.3866063074113959,"score_spread":0.27128819780523816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121688782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501921,0.000038346014,0.0000050940203,0.040727373,0.0017272232,0.00026078927,0.000050839157,0.000017802235,0.006980409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961534,0.000039155908,0.00010923097,0.0029300498,0.00032807406,0.0000063612933,0.00002565852,0.000021964166,0.00038607797],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977064,0.00055193645,0.0005394546,0.0002329769,0.00041991225,0.0005492783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650633,0.00030120226,0.00073761086,0.00039858237,0.0010764631,0.000979802],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001013738,0.00019018419,0.0002816018,0.00046347908,0.006523477,0.002198862,0.0004969612,0.00010742492,0.00040760695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012413585,0.00019358007,0.000034967143,0.00046881867,0.0007949498,0.00201456,0.00006742672,0.0009612082,0.0000017984901],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004457982,0.00046495136,0.031802937,0.000048060265,0.0008351756,0.010901888,0.55916816,0.000041818974,0.00004815862,0.33483604,0.055275783,0.0065324763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012572584,0.000097615855,0.0021318828,0.00006629465,0.00008141561,0.0032597692,0.6180467,0.000071921706,0.000023986644,0.0018641182,0.37267813,0.00042086534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99744046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33297193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043220984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00791249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99883693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121780508","doi":"10.1086/698435","title":"The Legal Academy’s Ideological Uniformity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University at Buffalo; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Loyola Marymount University; Western New England University; University of Connecticut; City University of New York; Wake Forest University; Loyola University Chicago; Georgetown University; University of Denver; State University of New York; University of Minnesota; Washington University in St. Louis; Boston College; Harvard University; University of Miami; York University; Northwestern University; University of Washington; Northern Illinois University; Washington and Lee University; University of the Pacific; University of Southern California; Santa Clara University; Yale University","keywords":"Ideology; Law; Legal profession; Directory; Politics; Political science; Balance (ability); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13029258447610423,"score_gpt":0.4639349417944505,"score_spread":0.33364235731834624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121780508","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16384716,0.0028886953,0.00006624187,0.73926824,0.0022256155,0.00011757605,9.2216004e-7,0.00001960384,0.09156597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852584,0.0022211184,0.00009277289,0.002700317,0.0024173798,0.0000015289355,4.0294594e-8,0.0000031230757,0.0073053217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836934,0.0005557811,0.00035524322,0.000047868252,0.00045294975,0.0002188425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969499,0.0016873064,0.000417971,0.0000847606,0.00080558774,0.000054460408],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054940684,0.000069711496,0.00012727821,0.000031888205,0.0033414455,0.00017826361,0.00051459344,0.000046533198,0.00008686522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004792153,0.000030462796,0.00006162406,0.00041142927,0.0017755205,0.0008316401,0.00007182751,0.00069447263,0.000057155663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014281976,0.000054997105,0.0011838496,0.0000018308607,0.00022203459,0.000002606996,0.027652912,0.0000025816737,0.000045668505,0.7254586,0.23853394,0.006698142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084880645,0.000092551716,0.004871736,0.0000071040954,0.000040330542,0.000027598775,0.02978692,0.0000011307983,0.00005527776,0.0073387087,0.95764905,0.000044707966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081122475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021600544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82141125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099106685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041273917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121809023","doi":"","title":"How to Build a Better Bar Exam","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memorization; Multiple choice; Context (archaeology); Test (biology); Legal education; Computer science; Legal writing; Point (geometry); Practice of law; Law; Psychology; Mathematics education; Legal profession; Legal research; Political science; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.022026462014504145,"score_gpt":0.34693033789041106,"score_spread":0.3249038758759069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121809023","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15775111,0.0001550498,0.010134921,0.75709814,0.0012834141,0.00015409118,9.245785e-7,0.00005107122,0.0733713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95651346,0.00014589212,0.00058357016,0.0055930126,0.0037006491,0.0000054027587,6.2179555e-7,0.000009355512,0.03344802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979973,0.00015527352,0.00012190872,0.000118010306,0.00030176181,0.0013057472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926704,0.00006795601,0.00008947563,0.000110706154,0.0003317275,0.00013309608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023233956,0.00006618952,0.00006622949,0.0001141135,0.0009623552,0.0005085736,0.00027102343,0.00005506866,0.00053820846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008814333,0.000060916933,0.000038779166,0.0005138436,0.00009645643,0.0007779137,0.000015591446,0.0013385837,0.00044037274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012471407,0.00004240933,0.001105202,4.742815e-7,0.000037897487,5.334551e-7,0.00761773,1.74348e-7,0.00023848588,0.92522186,0.024891602,0.040831167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093927796,0.00011396213,0.00037491164,0.0000033391314,0.000009056565,0.00002170483,0.011432553,8.4533013e-7,0.000048590962,0.09198213,0.8958337,0.000085289656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008734845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010337765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87094206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063444336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056949286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121921922","doi":"","title":"Against Exclusion: Teaching Transsystemically, Learning in Community","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commonwealth; Rigour; Legal education; Political science; Happening; Law; Sociology; Public administration; History","score_opus":0.017646328445838556,"score_gpt":0.3397817228713135,"score_spread":0.3221353944254749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121921922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85086876,0.00018912413,0.00036813313,0.020451238,0.00033544336,0.00011706661,1.5379958e-7,0.000036321257,0.12763377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912084,0.0006056208,0.000055766035,0.00042679952,0.00020343215,0.0000023634934,0.0000027771412,0.0000086629325,0.0074861823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964189,0.0019716641,0.00025870078,0.00007762916,0.00027457278,0.0009985399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926734,0.00034711728,0.00014544629,0.000100303805,0.00008182166,0.000057981735],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011758982,0.00006789975,0.000108374756,0.0001358074,0.0013606376,0.00015299427,0.00030525879,0.00007960587,0.00014089726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007777816,0.00006669082,0.000047828464,0.00032512035,0.000037160677,0.0006790017,0.000018114351,0.010996073,0.00009355753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026641459,0.00020347434,0.034279294,0.000009209273,0.000030617874,0.0000010305588,0.07021263,0.00013065197,0.0009408869,0.8473652,0.00013133735,0.046669025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009816156,0.00018380943,0.0029680962,0.00012476827,0.0000122233505,0.00005812869,0.44127473,0.00011336139,0.000008738211,0.07127108,0.48270282,0.000300627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006710304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02177889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77609414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011891475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005475444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121944165","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001504","title":"The Five Lessons I Learned Through Clinical Education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Indictment; Casebook; Churning; Legal education; Curriculum; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.15597166387903746,"score_gpt":0.5538591762690033,"score_spread":0.3978875123899658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121944165","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008784539,0.0001952895,0.0000919074,0.5547348,0.0022212863,0.00006734968,6.185388e-7,0.000022415317,0.43388176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683637,0.0012639248,0.0008481932,0.014459586,0.0025546378,0.0000029919936,0.0000026437338,0.0000045220095,0.012499773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861974,0.00048936007,0.00031598032,0.000091717106,0.00027238356,0.000210797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875575,0.00040234718,0.00025209642,0.00014043594,0.0003407856,0.00010858782],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020883067,0.000053273303,0.00006886057,0.000018296812,0.0040687406,0.0007136794,0.00026810117,0.00007010592,0.00029494197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008442444,0.00003896316,0.00007333144,0.00024499136,0.0002456223,0.0009511575,0.000008061377,0.0008449867,0.00020170986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060026646,0.00008980981,0.000038250975,1.6589425e-7,0.000006428019,5.4448583e-7,0.007447833,6.3812297e-7,0.0000026184293,0.7964729,0.10138564,0.09454916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007298566,0.000021353993,0.002572805,0.0000052978817,0.000009029543,0.00001220478,0.0071901283,0.0000016824456,0.0000024452188,0.16501157,0.82505304,0.00004747579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001417944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017278042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95957917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007265527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016009017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99722785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121983015","doi":"","title":"A FLEX TIME JD: NEW APPROACHES TO THE ACCESSIBILITY OF LEGAL EDUCATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Context (archaeology); Legal profession; Legal research; FLEX; Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Law; Diversity (politics); Legal writing; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.30159413218450865,"score_gpt":0.4334399001458242,"score_spread":0.13184576796131553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121983015","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061257405,0.0032984826,0.0000031668098,0.7288293,0.00025697827,0.00058713113,0.000005269506,0.000005288609,0.2664018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8799991,0.00179722,0.0003031888,0.03444455,0.00093222264,0.000094293944,0.000012410299,0.000011229458,0.082405776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999121,0.00026494433,0.00017856849,0.00011298744,0.00016895653,0.00015351214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986142,0.0000819551,0.00019974248,0.0007677907,0.00010387032,0.00023243709],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00223699,0.000055949087,0.00010921702,0.000028304452,0.0016873433,0.00038333982,0.0009850721,0.000029610728,0.001735966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003026259,0.00003416807,0.000044286735,0.00025674928,0.00016599885,0.00045417537,0.000025746058,0.00015966018,0.0005291576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.830862e-7,0.000015483276,0.00017627752,0.00005824926,0.000008966436,6.312544e-8,0.0037433922,2.8608585e-7,7.235047e-7,0.45979345,0.37328097,0.16292116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012802583,0.0000028417412,0.0065197926,0.00013569972,0.000026251744,5.608302e-7,0.0002367194,0.0000012191837,0.0000020258888,0.0013284537,0.9916877,0.000045923178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73292327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7874027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87938654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018079556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012541626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121998444","doi":"","title":"To Lawyer or Not to Lawyer, Is that the question?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAS-Space (University of London)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Economic Justice; Legal service; Political science; Legal profession; Law; Business","score_opus":0.05040420480849176,"score_gpt":0.3709611573844636,"score_spread":0.32055695257597183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121998444","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2748888,0.0000157889,0.0043889615,0.6238441,0.00057354587,0.00042502748,0.000018473387,0.00007609881,0.09576918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8765943,0.0000314656,0.00453188,0.008185213,0.00012713377,4.0201823e-7,0.0000024932715,0.000006596348,0.1105205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989666,0.00012017544,0.000075548705,0.0001800818,0.00040709128,0.00025051463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875486,0.00038620245,0.000099694764,0.00025059498,0.00031937408,0.00018930087],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012715885,0.000076156786,0.00010320447,0.00015214599,0.0009019671,0.000066902736,0.00041034134,0.00007722972,0.002350609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004015631,0.00007071961,0.000050684142,0.0012123914,0.00017469577,0.00061682274,0.00007640381,0.00019352285,0.00068366603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004628601,0.00018159523,0.0054927897,0.000013546607,0.000051544095,0.000015260071,0.3197392,0.000016093614,0.0004799004,0.3338975,0.32588917,0.013760534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014018199,0.000037591617,0.023690855,0.000011831813,0.000020465664,8.5146473e-7,0.10011639,0.0000016720337,0.00020461509,0.00014875979,0.8755272,0.000099584366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030959506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10636678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6156589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013308994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041861157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122009882","doi":"","title":"Enhancing the Legal Profession’s Capacity for Innovation: The Promise of Reflective Practice and Action Research for Increasing Access to Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Transformative learning; Enabling; Public relations; Legal profession; Action (physics); Action research; Political science; Sociology; Legal practice; Reflective practice; Wicked problem; Engineering ethics; Law; Management; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.2581071089191036,"score_gpt":0.565703784980431,"score_spread":0.30759667606132735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122009882","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38626203,0.00009628383,0.020249436,0.58325833,0.0009542929,0.0022104937,0.0000043259984,0.000012050486,0.006952737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945398,0.00020547898,0.0016030294,0.0006964433,0.001205039,0.00020847384,0.0000010014288,0.000010082323,0.0015306644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974095,0.0009043672,0.00030444495,0.00015291011,0.00042164707,0.000807107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991568,0.003946347,0.0006890336,0.00022526341,0.0035286068,0.000042711916],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03470885,0.00006958052,0.00009376229,0.00013934595,0.010148802,0.0011834141,0.0005803458,0.000069401554,0.000005327497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066561446,0.000044748598,0.00002843401,0.0005967216,0.0002581553,0.0029743067,0.00006710641,0.0018821552,8.898464e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006088409,0.00006495227,0.0000916499,0.000023650415,0.00006175383,5.1708923e-8,0.015605416,0.0000020483344,0.0033585397,0.9592818,0.0013494039,0.01955191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073752884,0.00039103438,0.0021488378,0.00009705031,0.00018112328,0.000058024267,0.25613824,0.000035304656,0.0035821202,0.2780463,0.4584199,0.00016456263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054182257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022769442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6812355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007569577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010127049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122016246","doi":"","title":"The Challenge of Inclusion in the Ethics Classroom","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections Canadian Journal of Music","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.12908029156784992,"score_gpt":0.37137822837466816,"score_spread":0.24229793680681824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122016246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032939084,0.000224496,0.00013867485,0.90832835,0.0013936823,0.000089530186,0.0000032735534,0.0000024428825,0.056880444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940036,0.00008021586,0.000031591397,0.0054167714,0.00039191206,0.0000017956789,2.9602106e-7,0.0000029751466,0.00007082656],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987949,0.0004934294,0.00028616158,0.00004366086,0.00026000806,0.000121828256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984049,0.0008089255,0.00022070254,0.000079548634,0.00035473538,0.0001311513],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002328563,0.000037011916,0.000061033592,0.00014209512,0.0013592378,0.000093123504,0.00043920655,0.00006296383,0.00027503085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038602834,0.000024325002,0.00005352347,0.0007812231,0.00021387354,0.0002573448,0.00002339258,0.0010852328,0.000006333177],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009544662,0.000021882728,0.000470459,0.0000035557202,0.000016030748,0.00000795725,0.8589727,0.000028687156,0.000018911345,0.10825316,0.025791163,0.0064059515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000744553,0.000060927636,0.0006954008,0.00002016583,0.000008035349,0.0000063333564,0.18018632,0.000012585095,0.000003888103,0.005168351,0.8137343,0.000029250321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09265224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8668115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9610645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013156493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003898095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122093200","doi":"","title":"Advocacy in Non-Adversarial Family Law: A Recommendation for Revision to the Model Code","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Negotiation; Family law; Political science; Law; Dispute resolution; Code (set theory); Public relations; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.030075939681031,"score_gpt":0.3782278832655172,"score_spread":0.3481519435844862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122093200","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18191181,0.00016800524,0.15388383,0.57754654,0.00292698,0.0023751648,0.000012101759,0.000041262887,0.08113428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990449,0.000411699,0.00068668625,0.0038614217,0.00050723326,0.000018979294,0.000008891126,0.000009505206,0.0040465575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850845,0.00014457594,0.00023732884,0.00012726904,0.000190867,0.0007914809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993281,0.00019990689,0.00013696282,0.00010217725,0.0001845382,0.000048349804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005036889,0.00006436775,0.000085668966,0.000088706816,0.0005205518,0.0001647548,0.0002449745,0.000056951223,0.000062664556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044007172,0.00005130857,0.000049260416,0.00038083649,0.000019114092,0.00066045683,0.000015309246,0.001084325,0.00009411291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012759653,0.000067650166,0.00012803762,0.0000023632795,0.000016700258,3.9756102e-8,0.011708365,0.0013005696,0.00014204512,0.9426679,0.0075647123,0.036273997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072823383,0.00012703075,0.00008833606,0.00001760298,0.000012254862,0.00000251911,0.024071136,0.0038023838,0.000006334697,0.11353926,0.8574894,0.000115503986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026823224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02125954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8499247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093471404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058953753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122188266","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4419","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR ALL: TOWARDS AN “EXPANSIVE VISION” OF JUSTICE AND TECHNOLOGY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Economic Justice; Deliverable; Software deployment; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.07498148193957802,"score_gpt":0.4503946477101648,"score_spread":0.3754131657705868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122188266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59743404,0.00022287547,0.0109656835,0.2958251,0.003355094,0.006018414,0.00016744272,0.0002968239,0.08571456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97312075,0.00006922212,0.01595746,0.008143539,0.00064783514,0.00035140346,0.000013151917,0.000040973297,0.0016556511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980182,0.00011965822,0.0005349712,0.00043717332,0.00045651587,0.00043347618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958128,0.00076490664,0.0003491929,0.00043634555,0.002298506,0.0003382649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073502556,0.00018556009,0.00033233283,0.0006061725,0.00038363764,0.0005164847,0.0012301793,0.0002231529,0.0005064008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006390215,0.00018995072,0.00004085995,0.0015589707,0.00028537388,0.0032407208,0.00030685455,0.00025788872,0.000059875372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081990793,0.0023779543,0.003107518,0.0048654387,0.00043256473,0.000007554972,0.10957602,0.00085119146,0.03364405,0.38069487,0.30326512,0.16035782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020433394,0.001770111,0.05004531,0.0004772178,0.0051632477,0.000008487166,0.12399587,0.00065553165,0.014139332,0.012327501,0.7877972,0.0015768359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049923365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007251681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4845321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006900226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007936989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7745966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122270388","doi":"10.53300/001c.5598","title":"The idea of human rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05102647534024038,"score_gpt":0.42031768459823554,"score_spread":0.3692912092579952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122270388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025962607,0.006910426,0.00000608529,0.04896885,0.00016637349,0.00014970757,4.890866e-7,0.000013068165,0.9435254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96232766,0.0062131756,0.0002443105,0.0122860735,0.00043788253,0.00004425988,0.0000064296787,0.0000068569084,0.018433336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993761,0.00019084859,0.00017211046,0.000049244314,0.00013806864,0.000073616786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993194,0.0002535459,0.00012521612,0.00015766734,0.00011758965,0.000026577482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015184757,0.000028146633,0.00007608118,0.0000054011175,0.0008982352,0.000042476033,0.00014633333,0.000016263615,0.00034899206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003577028,0.000017170922,0.00003312928,0.00019675463,0.00015606699,0.00013692625,0.0000072478156,0.000075022086,0.00009576581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.789801e-8,0.000008001768,0.000005974761,0.000036924488,0.0000018491594,1.4177469e-8,0.00017170698,2.7775695e-9,0.000003879735,0.95434374,0.04270853,0.0027192675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015563915,0.0000048135744,0.000043725002,0.0001303446,0.000010981948,1.1753905e-7,0.000023008673,7.588628e-8,0.0000146212815,0.024306344,0.9754256,0.000024827215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071301856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0092061795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009609828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059173548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122295073","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.983","title":"IF PHILOSOPHICAL LEGAL ETHICS IS THE ANSWER, WHAT IS THE QUESTION?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Legal ethics; Law; Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Principle of legality; Political science; Sociology; Meta-ethics; Normative ethics; Immorality; Information ethics; Legal profession; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03466443420024338,"score_gpt":0.35657622478657486,"score_spread":0.32191179058633146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122295073","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053721596,0.00018277254,0.00010588348,0.82789695,0.0016937746,0.00007548088,0.0000043099326,0.000011718794,0.16465694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98267025,0.0015301756,0.0005553487,0.009864647,0.0010586751,8.070443e-8,8.1929596e-7,0.000003734774,0.004316289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988249,0.00038140596,0.00010825526,0.000083544815,0.00046509455,0.00013680974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984832,0.0004782936,0.00018404148,0.00017898732,0.0005797988,0.00009570175],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019794442,0.00005625309,0.00006624916,0.000011325754,0.0039493367,0.00042405335,0.00055444695,0.00014626894,0.0068360073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002816588,0.00004030677,0.00008644759,0.00008029445,0.0008481094,0.0029342985,0.000037178546,0.0016107996,0.000027210996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013209583,0.000045955796,0.00009804167,0.0000010004261,0.000024296705,0.0000018467038,0.0772221,6.8174296e-7,0.00002396141,0.90290445,0.018027838,0.0016365955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010693753,0.000015581223,0.00058783044,0.000010198667,0.000029637968,0.000011613118,0.06461013,0.000009207206,0.000010621332,0.011305857,0.9232509,0.000051479947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16658121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26161847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9772981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011113247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075197546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122356076","doi":"","title":"Administrative Justice and Adjudicative Ethics in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.08548042270226337,"score_gpt":0.392835574526358,"score_spread":0.3073551518240946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122356076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23483802,0.00073696184,0.00003973115,0.14002402,0.0015806201,0.00035143716,0.00003085753,0.000038245427,0.6223601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899438,0.00008531781,0.0005264915,0.007585824,0.0002988178,0.000024046289,0.00000527138,0.0000051176517,0.001525308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875796,0.0003839233,0.00016820016,0.00012136488,0.00029103874,0.0002775062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982902,0.0010884139,0.000099292614,0.00010651971,0.00015200948,0.00026360404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011089293,0.00006988561,0.00008695218,0.0000289279,0.00052850664,0.000083220984,0.00011406627,0.00008225939,0.0007075014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033546353,0.000073304174,0.0000092607515,0.0004105275,0.00018508891,0.0009144124,0.000019553232,0.0008018151,0.00005959284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006361312,0.00004548516,0.017419921,0.000011039503,0.0000072585026,0.0000013822253,0.029124768,7.0275473e-7,0.000011417569,0.9464664,0.0065618916,0.00034338038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014134754,0.000009954183,0.044575624,0.00001661368,0.00002457399,0.0000013871081,0.06819834,0.0000025018146,0.00007292646,0.0017329672,0.88507795,0.00014579068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97507894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99546385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94473344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004041764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071662897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99846214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122378279","doi":"10.1177/1037969x0803300301","title":"Teaching ‘Indigenous Peoples and the Law’","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternative Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Law; Sociology; Ecology","score_opus":0.04611415241944052,"score_gpt":0.37243170542012266,"score_spread":0.32631755300068216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122378279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33875278,0.00031567147,0.0003199974,0.07685622,0.00082020106,0.00012859445,0.000001860989,0.000020111893,0.5827846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99203664,0.0005030107,0.00036790085,0.0038501087,0.0010662482,0.0000037820832,4.484029e-7,0.0000046663113,0.0021672184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988184,0.00053727435,0.00014676742,0.0000693556,0.00027219226,0.0001560341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879456,0.00075922883,0.00016156808,0.000059636106,0.00014964645,0.000075345844],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013682448,0.00005294914,0.000074882104,0.000025991158,0.006346654,0.00028229342,0.00018372518,0.000022385773,0.00016395078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004265154,0.000034865003,0.00003344753,0.000081573926,0.000777026,0.0007955198,0.000018748247,0.0006822826,0.000023209015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008925682,0.000019415858,0.00038829463,4.2138262e-7,0.000020050124,0.0000064688393,0.21421485,0.000001317184,0.000003247494,0.78430814,0.00032602332,0.00070286664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007893611,0.00002494401,0.0010996652,0.000012258069,0.000018842486,0.00041418624,0.052256852,0.000010540141,0.000032385975,0.06419902,0.8810299,0.000112026406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.107548155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033050675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88070387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051878815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026481104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99494696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122420603","doi":"","title":"The Future of Legal Education: Three Visions and a Prediction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Legal profession; Legal education; Variety (cybernetics); Legal practice; Legal realism; Legal research; Law; Empirical legal studies; Function (biology); Practice of law; Political science; Legal service; Legal opinion; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Private law; Black letter law; Computer science","score_opus":0.013455421616466241,"score_gpt":0.3393582222721477,"score_spread":0.32590280065568145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122420603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056167617,0.00043198958,0.00014667147,0.4308786,0.0017642237,0.0003201896,0.000001575471,0.000037108643,0.510252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97992307,0.00021935745,0.0006400625,0.00069376326,0.00067751884,0.000046523437,0.0000022181275,0.0000022136685,0.017795257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960893,0.00003642659,0.0001059876,0.000055135024,0.00012676333,0.000066735236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938154,0.00014084959,0.00005422811,0.0000922131,0.00028895662,0.000042207896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025857417,0.000026471795,0.000027458336,0.000024634604,0.0006874688,0.0001906348,0.00007425358,0.00003195976,0.00090775866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015776268,0.000017177254,0.000011220492,0.00026335462,0.0001308079,0.0007139086,0.000009776616,0.00009330284,0.000032912943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.958371e-7,0.00002927792,0.0026048196,8.548205e-7,0.0000031648663,3.2524707e-9,0.0018268562,7.3322994e-8,0.000016395521,0.8300687,0.093565345,0.07188378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023658473,0.000007733332,0.044688147,0.0000019603842,0.0000033879262,5.12232e-7,0.023142653,0.000014274933,0.0000051261686,0.010850483,0.92124176,0.00002031084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076545016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056944303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92375547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014436387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007229217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122478317","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Aspiration and Reality in Legal Education de David Sandomierski (Aspiration and Reality in Legal Education by David Sandomierski)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Humanities; Sociology; Political science; Management; Art; Economics","score_opus":0.017896229108738712,"score_gpt":0.3565283626879016,"score_spread":0.3386321335791629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122478317","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100946076,0.1590227,0.00196652,0.7162902,0.00080201606,0.002133267,0.0000147867195,0.00007353453,0.018750904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8731126,0.0847149,0.00015402817,0.03753706,0.0010287977,0.00013446657,0.00014461548,0.000026943164,0.0031465713],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619114,0.001300984,0.00079743617,0.0003929927,0.00040346137,0.0009140015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985864,0.00019284735,0.0005457737,0.00015745427,0.00026935607,0.00024814426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006525894,0.00019789585,0.00031468587,0.0001932726,0.0005388353,0.0004286687,0.00019289616,0.00017286881,0.00012257206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027276403,0.00021236551,0.000054828437,0.00086838007,0.00014736758,0.0031637973,0.000024651308,0.0020762112,0.0000061585843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086420734,0.0011730682,0.011974499,0.00030595931,0.0000861644,0.000002235088,0.021302018,0.000020590756,0.0012874136,0.35445407,0.36428308,0.24424668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018469203,0.00022148444,0.004002793,0.00022140739,0.000075006064,0.000056712972,0.00882272,0.00008417027,0.00005004094,0.0138260005,0.97046304,0.00032970423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017803939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019626888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77216655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020124177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022066053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122478365","doi":"","title":"Examining the Real Demand for Legal Services","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal research; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Legal profession; Legal service; Legal advice; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.06102453544762384,"score_gpt":0.39986169713929065,"score_spread":0.33883716169166683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122478365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29638875,0.0000023932357,0.00016781075,0.065910935,0.0009052086,0.00014283769,0.0000011535786,0.000042944703,0.63643795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97427416,0.000005700197,0.0015158289,0.0020499271,0.00062874984,0.000027818618,0.000002813624,0.0000027772053,0.021492254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996277,0.000034579185,0.0000729235,0.00006560587,0.00009689755,0.00010225983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992393,0.0004772466,0.000042548985,0.00008992197,0.00012091093,0.000030018176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009144117,0.000027239868,0.000026961321,0.000016543569,0.0007991848,0.00029258232,0.00014957778,0.00003719188,0.0007196833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024580414,0.000017907247,0.000011873578,0.00015697368,0.00006897848,0.0005200896,0.000008391188,0.00014138815,0.00003323837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022733902,0.000013679758,0.0024677324,0.0000020761931,0.0000037939633,3.9149814e-8,0.012867744,2.9000694e-7,0.0003917197,0.9736875,0.0065045757,0.0040585245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004604535,0.0000054618354,0.0073310304,6.964058e-7,0.0000047351355,2.441251e-7,0.01896453,0.000028472436,0.000058638543,0.0017218221,0.9718051,0.00003323302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01370832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05456203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97196573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005888337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002483463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122623942","doi":"","title":"FITNESS FOR PURPOSE: MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL ETHICSEDUCATION FOR LAWYERS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Legal profession; Legal ethics; Law; Political science; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.07790721303275834,"score_gpt":0.43330832610291975,"score_spread":0.3554011130701614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122623942","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019562173,0.00956357,0.0002548808,0.95322347,0.00075153407,0.0020445064,0.00003427014,0.000024718323,0.033907413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6615027,0.0149121145,0.0024385694,0.2726082,0.0023223853,0.0011669376,0.00026570872,0.00003992134,0.04474347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918556,0.00014787096,0.00018555678,0.000116982555,0.00011788025,0.0002461734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988352,0.00032444773,0.00011029363,0.00018019105,0.00038593097,0.00016395087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027333405,0.000064357184,0.00011461683,0.00004517204,0.0010710766,0.00020067686,0.00024633124,0.00006196101,0.0002884311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025651718,0.0000543253,0.00006453333,0.00027921758,0.00008901974,0.0003391639,0.0000019845168,0.00017999561,0.000036829595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014239481,0.000005924013,0.0000049218174,0.000085892956,0.000003984686,7.396164e-8,0.0026080622,3.0260836e-7,0.0000014554503,0.77003354,0.16091336,0.06634109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067055844,0.000011085795,0.00014805436,0.00022938874,0.00004035545,8.179461e-7,0.0006364534,0.000002799939,0.0000028104855,0.0034727738,0.9953092,0.00007920328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063852705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.385159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8343958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002773263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032999997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9423812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122642849","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005555","title":"Testing Theory and Debunking Stereotypes: Lawyers’ Views on the Practice of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Ethical code; Public relations; Professional responsibility; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07706624245631,"score_gpt":0.38284459148184546,"score_spread":0.30577834902553547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122642849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07184727,0.0014467862,0.00010886189,0.14600667,0.00060035114,0.00020441672,0.0000063021885,0.000008732431,0.7797706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845996,0.000042771557,0.001840192,0.012894067,0.00033937788,0.0000015487722,1.5051864e-7,0.0000066640882,0.00027562497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846864,0.0006245072,0.00034280913,0.0000850605,0.0002736564,0.00020533505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946832,0.0037969393,0.00053158763,0.00013764483,0.0006026414,0.0002479517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044909534,0.00007253978,0.00011553953,0.000070891205,0.00082068215,0.00024254565,0.00031916343,0.000051167674,0.00022841217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006386708,0.000055177745,0.00003284627,0.0002992551,0.0005337217,0.0012126665,0.000008213264,0.00045030104,0.000015778895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010599591,0.000014912951,0.00021984107,0.0000036121066,0.000014355219,0.0000069996677,0.023420036,0.000009886328,0.000052389754,0.9704474,0.0010512345,0.0047487365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006999731,0.000050965813,0.00034328175,0.0001462678,0.00003119198,0.000039257582,0.006638297,0.0000025766003,0.00012194788,0.0061809835,0.9863045,0.000070682334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04422194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16668074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98525333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012493935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019455787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96214265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122755571","doi":"10.31651/2524-2660-2020-4-24-30","title":"CONTENT COMPONENT OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OF BACHELORS IN LAW AT CANADIAN UNIVERSITIES","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vìsnik Čerkasʹkogo unìversitetu. Serìâ Pedagogìčnì naukii/Vìsnik Čerkasʹkogo unìversitetu. Serìâ Pedagogìčnì nauki","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Context (archaeology); Professional development; Pedagogy; Political science; Law; Sociology; Medical education; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.20497218458610533,"score_gpt":0.36618725355534976,"score_spread":0.16121506896924442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122755571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8529361,0.00086691725,0.000094642666,0.034853846,0.002784439,0.0026057563,0.0015616908,0.000436647,0.10386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97940683,0.00044205063,0.0012463902,0.005357034,0.0007184039,0.00004468568,0.0009761533,0.0001945524,0.011613906],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864028,0.0018232543,0.0030996148,0.0022427596,0.0033706175,0.003060972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890679,0.002031835,0.0023799979,0.0014410856,0.0022859115,0.0027932432],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029357173,0.0015701785,0.0025168653,0.0026900796,0.0028058023,0.000316277,0.0030540028,0.0013152574,0.0059248917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010790623,0.0018443733,0.0010676347,0.0059018605,0.0030377316,0.0041270684,0.0009995493,0.0026598014,0.000555557],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004663582,0.0031542925,0.07794946,0.0016616054,0.002033904,0.0009951611,0.6022272,0.0022696606,0.015299282,0.24167444,0.04340772,0.004663685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072483635,0.0008493655,0.016047342,0.00069492136,0.0006936778,0.00005377779,0.44624954,0.0005238961,0.0040154145,0.00037052625,0.5204916,0.0027615703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2929471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2759677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4770839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004197105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012829893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122804512","doi":"","title":"Revising Canada's Ethical Rules for Judges Returningto Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal ethics; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07271359044952126,"score_gpt":0.3724877803201102,"score_spread":0.29977418987058896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122804512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044309734,0.00019077808,0.0011292585,0.3129327,0.002084082,0.00021555711,0.000014013016,0.00005174422,0.6789509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89512116,0.00020829639,0.049091537,0.050439905,0.0030123226,0.000016751275,0.000013456688,0.0000334452,0.0020631053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835455,0.00042651314,0.00031635832,0.00012889723,0.00045495664,0.0003187121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730206,0.0010676947,0.00036792952,0.00012347128,0.00092821807,0.00021064824],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031860238,0.0000838654,0.0001156385,0.000041846884,0.0025716878,0.00041238283,0.0002577665,0.00015504604,0.0009066221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009170871,0.00007848436,0.00005024488,0.0002098345,0.00015354795,0.00094068545,0.000018225339,0.0014040546,0.000017751874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046466528,0.000054765907,0.00021233849,0.0000071693744,0.000035590656,0.000015740292,0.022743417,7.4590736e-7,0.000013958807,0.8775641,0.09438942,0.004916333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013643265,0.000024030081,0.00030286578,0.000020175832,0.00004036858,0.000065373104,0.012389335,0.000003034224,0.000035085588,0.0071701407,0.9797002,0.00011297666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6224159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79697794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8906902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021636338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00338346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122891070","doi":"","title":"A Community of Procedure Scholars: Teaching Procedure and the Legal Academy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Queen's University","funders":"European Commission; University of Oxford","keywords":"Scholarship; Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Academic community; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law; Media studies; Library science; Social science; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.041240817251016804,"score_gpt":0.3399253154453063,"score_spread":0.2986844981942895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122891070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78300935,0.000115863586,0.00040622233,0.049876668,0.00009402437,0.00072856614,0.000021252768,0.00009173877,0.1656563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746864,0.000029999706,0.007013926,0.0009171168,0.00008725325,0.0000045093034,0.0000042465795,0.000012589209,0.017244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941777,0.004933887,0.00018932359,0.00017305551,0.0003027266,0.00022333382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832743,0.0007591272,0.00026471546,0.00022730163,0.00029227044,0.00012914781],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006676134,0.00012189,0.0001842001,0.00018410565,0.0033298659,0.00043521318,0.0006413125,0.00017108691,0.0002131143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071632843,0.00009915339,0.000071116774,0.0008123221,0.00077198417,0.0025246972,0.00013208728,0.0032189542,0.000050751245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009992056,0.00017428215,0.005981436,0.000061491635,0.00008847056,0.0000011060736,0.16187492,0.0000022879494,0.0007761585,0.8229207,0.001209441,0.006809818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008575728,0.000016749504,0.0042004185,0.000040837193,0.000083177234,0.000004313365,0.3494624,0.000014508051,0.000057331505,0.0055484776,0.63953966,0.00017455638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01603548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071283104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8173722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085352454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052274956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122934028","doi":"10.29173/alr335","title":"Cowboy Jurists and the Making of Legal Professionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Novelty; Politics; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Legal profession; Legal ethics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.08002456854676912,"score_gpt":0.425590449034681,"score_spread":0.3455658804879119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122934028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024998356,0.03219267,0.0000036715596,0.42313102,0.00026801322,0.00049795303,9.739911e-7,0.000008874308,0.541397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516944,0.015578702,0.000086651475,0.023189204,0.00007616823,0.000035707355,0.0000032253802,0.0000041975763,0.009331705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912655,0.00033639857,0.00020520367,0.00007569416,0.00017296046,0.00008319163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900776,0.00057347416,0.00016050263,0.00012776165,0.000116415096,0.000014062817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008053702,0.0000437153,0.00013741056,0.000008587491,0.0005243315,0.00002091518,0.00011892891,0.00002457614,0.0003819352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011819075,0.000027159675,0.00003575301,0.00025779245,0.00050706667,0.00029862698,0.000021328962,0.00012776259,0.000027730703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026827588,0.000015141724,0.00009554954,0.000094735675,0.000006356923,2.791322e-7,0.0038033526,1.12895036e-8,5.339525e-7,0.9751234,0.019902537,0.0009554349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009513499,0.0000020291827,0.00017780619,0.00035089394,0.000021109672,0.0000067447127,0.0001608483,5.4981433e-7,0.0000010917785,0.0010098703,0.998137,0.000036933405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020139432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045844517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97823447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009665488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028107577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122939006","doi":"","title":"Are We Ethically Bound to Use Student Engagement Technologies for Teaching Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Clicker; Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Student engagement; Competence (human resources); Legal education; Active learning (machine learning); Law; Political science; Mathematics education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1335115211788556,"score_gpt":0.45513596597553774,"score_spread":0.3216244447966822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122939006","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09011433,0.00051759795,0.015747394,0.8807374,0.0011325354,0.00065600785,0.00000335608,0.00022913779,0.010862235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99011725,0.00038768642,0.0017145332,0.0025013539,0.00031020376,0.00004238779,0.000001045181,0.000011330204,0.004914224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977794,0.00032398538,0.00022455318,0.00014203956,0.0004422998,0.0010877062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877083,0.00037230123,0.00022518943,0.00012835041,0.00039790137,0.00010540442],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009332592,0.000083789455,0.00010077872,0.000112790345,0.001502411,0.00069852575,0.0003822318,0.000102451086,0.000011022948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005513185,0.00007552521,0.000046992813,0.00023936281,0.00010684373,0.0007649674,0.000047909696,0.0033998708,0.000024682551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016121128,0.0000926597,0.0005657862,0.0000011637709,0.00004385775,5.0910023e-7,0.014662087,0.000012634246,0.000018539638,0.9728117,0.00600828,0.005766663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015721277,0.000094838324,0.00007585152,0.000009585042,0.000013181309,0.0000047327603,0.17166647,0.0000011940726,0.0000075265625,0.18340722,0.6444873,0.00007486988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012102741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027375558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9000029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001602878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048926612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122948347","doi":"","title":"Cold, Hard Justice Lessons from the Fleet: Innovating from the Bottom Up","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Incubator; Popularity; Economic Justice; Legal service; Mentorship; Legal practice; Legal research; Service (business); Political science; Legal profession; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Law; Management; Legal realism; Business; Marketing; Economics","score_opus":0.07162878847712874,"score_gpt":0.3999315251994584,"score_spread":0.3283027367223297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122948347","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19772941,0.0012793808,0.0017509353,0.7745466,0.0039043527,0.00021595592,0.000033670236,0.000042063628,0.020497583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822624,0.001393843,0.00025332108,0.0046583554,0.0044543194,0.00001047591,0.00000841069,0.000015761649,0.0069431122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973942,0.0004455648,0.00030507537,0.00018345378,0.0005010108,0.0011707024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686944,0.0014775295,0.0006890211,0.00051406736,0.00038657634,0.00006335083],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005062406,0.000118186326,0.00011713489,0.000025888314,0.010244138,0.0020073915,0.0015052245,0.000098236866,0.0003728057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005724483,0.000075008014,0.00007102632,0.00030002563,0.00031164553,0.001064335,0.00007228716,0.0043223337,0.00015043713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014877973,0.000029957357,0.0049105235,3.8344712e-7,0.0001289888,6.352041e-7,0.012724298,0.0000014490536,0.0002577679,0.9407516,0.018836044,0.022343477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038424655,0.00002110546,0.017821945,0.00002561971,0.00015856289,0.000006505383,0.07869338,0.00002455176,0.00003802106,0.21474367,0.68791455,0.00016782421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05167372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07045838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78453296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005284803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010047956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123116383","doi":"","title":"The Law Practice Program: Tackling Racial Inequality in the Legal Profession?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Legal profession; Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Practice of law; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Social science","score_opus":0.13688249971330668,"score_gpt":0.4915060772265879,"score_spread":0.3546235775132812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123116383","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022479963,0.009274443,7.743009e-7,0.7450309,0.00048304794,0.0012097231,0.0000023927848,0.000016260079,0.24375765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8141144,0.006891706,0.00020403386,0.17357148,0.0010417773,0.0006545802,0.000016778455,0.000015552892,0.0034896915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954526,0.003353513,0.00030326322,0.00011474352,0.00044801825,0.0003278973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977703,0.0010427538,0.00019615247,0.0003898541,0.00041100904,0.00018994501],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01696376,0.000077806115,0.00010765088,0.000021174368,0.0023065372,0.00058909395,0.0006704346,0.00005151988,0.000089672416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012501252,0.000037782323,0.0000374338,0.0009737247,0.0003048318,0.0007079174,0.000019185169,0.0006819266,0.00020994518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029301586,0.000025558065,0.000039810053,0.000021084456,0.0000048790616,0.0000028301467,0.018534211,2.1872818e-7,3.1128064e-8,0.8952051,0.06467068,0.021492694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048217466,0.0000088737925,0.000102149286,0.0001221395,0.000025055213,0.0000040827917,0.016085854,0.000001813467,9.49911e-8,0.0014966084,0.98204374,0.00006135816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6667231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9450999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91737306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032808533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006675641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123120961","doi":"","title":"Trends in Global and Canadian Lawyer Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020295568163073593,"score_gpt":0.33222740640283904,"score_spread":0.31193183823976545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123120961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18623942,0.00011197173,0.0000011201323,0.09449631,0.0005758997,0.000115052484,0.0000054855063,0.000023644448,0.7184311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761599,0.0000146726115,0.00035170757,0.0069131646,0.00024680822,0.000046970763,0.000016161826,0.0000038861735,0.016246762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992725,0.00010028788,0.00013040702,0.00013898022,0.0001269079,0.0002308695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993592,0.000036753565,0.000039684295,0.000114038136,0.000121191086,0.00032916758],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002733914,0.00005853029,0.00006014538,0.00010653887,0.00034076016,0.0003721703,0.000106588515,0.0000784433,0.0059711663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024026686,0.00006294337,0.000014001858,0.00076863007,0.000097083735,0.0011227226,0.000008762413,0.00016921376,0.0005978928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.141366e-7,0.000043256277,0.04497139,0.0000015254345,0.0000029879384,3.33719e-7,0.0017567952,5.1060846e-7,0.0000053019758,0.8478943,0.07154547,0.033777304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006747391,0.000004291661,0.15118626,0.0000055900255,0.0000024417047,8.7801374e-7,0.002645005,0.0000025862585,0.0000017164451,0.00797302,0.83803296,0.00007777347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96655226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97416234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8399213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034069695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016728963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99493754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123174293","doi":"","title":"The Ethical Obligations of Defence Counsel in Sexual Assault Cases","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Law; Value (mathematics); Legal ethics; Position (finance); Closing (real estate); Stereotype (UML); Political science; Cross-examination; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.04049530807725021,"score_gpt":0.3626806926764827,"score_spread":0.32218538459923246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123174293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6338343,0.00013614884,0.00033002323,0.1849718,0.0010291171,0.00034576352,0.000016427019,0.00008226783,0.17925417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938969,0.000031856747,0.00038742693,0.0031167525,0.00020029244,0.000028937975,0.000005088222,0.000005170497,0.0023275658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983781,0.00054706715,0.00028012766,0.00013748245,0.00045367843,0.00020356421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639875,0.0027679503,0.00013677686,0.00022583078,0.00037520874,0.00009548852],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028138338,0.00006173672,0.000089096655,0.000038783583,0.00081702275,0.00019345536,0.000272704,0.00017063228,0.00023915623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008849057,0.00005093931,0.000023736104,0.0006527681,0.0004884656,0.0003946385,0.000017338514,0.0008212714,0.00013506405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005381725,0.000045219796,0.004467773,0.0000030896472,0.000004139946,5.0053745e-7,0.002951554,0.000014870711,0.00010519417,0.98446846,0.0069874097,0.0009464332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014768986,0.000030566323,0.007504101,0.000013885642,0.0000075985454,0.000001930346,0.00847885,0.000047184745,0.00008915809,0.019765463,0.9638153,0.00009831809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046098184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16355033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96470296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061103456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007299419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123194011","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics Versus Political Practices: The Application of the Rules of Professional Conduct to Lawyer-Politicians","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Surrender; Law; Political science; Professional responsibility; Politics; Legal profession; Balance (ability); Adversarial system; Professional ethics; Practice of law; Psychology","score_opus":0.09999434603611196,"score_gpt":0.4310620774981539,"score_spread":0.33106773146204194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123194011","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24681455,0.000032060212,0.00009454853,0.4838394,0.0017067586,0.0010681734,0.000039376846,0.000036101537,0.26636904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98840386,0.0000032516605,0.0007161629,0.0074688005,0.00044679432,0.00014217265,0.0000067458413,0.000009202308,0.0028030341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977028,0.0007818118,0.00035958807,0.00016927396,0.0006767281,0.00030980541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995265,0.0027458915,0.00048526944,0.00043453247,0.0009015444,0.00016778355],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014687174,0.00009040588,0.0001257177,0.000033667817,0.0008168745,0.00013868394,0.00057111954,0.00015729648,0.0006493356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00980499,0.000057626785,0.000064538,0.0004509182,0.00071743317,0.0008371501,0.00007936739,0.0008568197,0.0002983956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015615504,0.00012276538,0.00047189018,0.000013664154,0.00001677867,4.2681066e-8,0.0039091846,0.0000024879016,0.00062232895,0.98989254,0.0047711004,0.000161595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002123751,0.000034766406,0.0060890405,0.000028435708,0.000037077232,8.5740317e-7,0.024158003,0.000011950795,0.0011060862,0.02389934,0.9443164,0.00010570731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1325578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0137008075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106474814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021414356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123196425","doi":"","title":"Law and Learning 'from the Field': The Pedagogical Relevance of Collaborative Teacher-Student Empirical Legal Research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Perspective (graphical); Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Empirical research; Legal research; Legal education; Empirical legal studies; Position (finance); Perception; Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.20029242665383198,"score_gpt":0.43050874698198777,"score_spread":0.23021632032815578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123196425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15507472,0.0000058486,0.000041058123,0.020432966,0.000094164105,0.00032068015,0.0000035600283,0.000028249018,0.82399875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989956,0.008258039,0.00024900772,0.0008067697,0.00013259819,0.000003705935,0.0000020451894,0.000005325675,0.0005864627],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971609,0.0019147778,0.000118668104,0.00020007777,0.00039767908,0.00020791031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603385,0.0031543996,0.000101162004,0.00019052219,0.00047330512,0.00004677024],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014364518,0.00007309866,0.000094841234,0.00049727806,0.001547362,0.00012011986,0.00044679144,0.00008893503,0.00019211818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023029975,0.000049852282,0.000031883726,0.0053664083,0.0007280857,0.00052738556,0.00015595483,0.001000974,0.00001003271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011227307,0.00020596171,0.006851094,0.00000256377,0.000044029584,0.000009828942,0.6279064,9.05609e-7,0.000003488402,0.35920542,0.0024523921,0.0032056172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012523668,0.000085055995,0.0015708067,0.000007666039,0.000017317452,3.5406072e-7,0.17865367,0.0000048405545,0.00003377115,0.000020279926,0.8194268,0.000054202952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44698623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15105419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83488137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009011302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001169616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123271246","doi":"10.5235/le.15.2.243","title":"Regulation in Practice: The ‘Ethical Economy’ of Lawyer Regulation in Canada and a Case Study in Lawyer Deviance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Deviance (statistics); Legal ethics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.08432628590548419,"score_gpt":0.4334728592694356,"score_spread":0.3491465733639514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123271246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.790612,0.00006845943,0.000023526005,0.1910276,0.00026223122,0.0004520891,0.0000014456417,0.000005366836,0.017547311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959113,0.000012024448,0.00019820024,0.003616355,0.00008993383,0.00002944593,0.0000018044536,0.0000053364724,0.00013560435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746835,0.0014950304,0.0004011777,0.00013573853,0.00029715168,0.00020253881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963469,0.0030243876,0.00021039907,0.00015578198,0.000212592,0.00004996234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00674397,0.00006895195,0.00011473204,0.00009228752,0.00019437884,0.00007295157,0.00008433597,0.00021402317,0.00004461627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005688733,0.0000628517,0.000009102245,0.0007887761,0.0001429584,0.001445402,0.000023867624,0.0018350302,0.0000017963423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031284464,0.00021738249,0.26384535,0.000016944827,0.000006713533,0.000025050762,0.19593742,0.00016684251,0.00000813746,0.53859097,0.00016678752,0.0009870735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006610086,0.000026956744,0.58387226,0.000048404614,0.000021460028,0.0000593672,0.21235466,0.0005251784,0.000022774637,0.0039262436,0.19827564,0.00020604057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9849688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53466475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048891135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040151244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7972395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123285973","doi":"","title":"Regulatory Reform in Ontario: Machine Learning and Regulation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Big data; Analytics; Government (linguistics); Computer science; Business; Artificial intelligence; Data science; Data mining","score_opus":0.041144070679876375,"score_gpt":0.3422707816455392,"score_spread":0.30112671096566285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123285973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6975901,0.000090293055,0.000052730287,0.09683147,0.0014052441,0.00022886752,0.000001935101,0.000072225346,0.20372711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98812646,0.00004538219,0.00094762276,0.004938902,0.00029114535,0.000010666551,0.00006535573,0.0000064098854,0.0055680387],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991853,0.000102411206,0.0001945022,0.00016005215,0.00017588536,0.00018184802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959093,0.000043340886,0.000091625065,0.00011901074,0.00008136639,0.00007375073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071596174,0.00007766683,0.00008508398,0.00014035162,0.0008291079,0.00010113513,0.00010213237,0.0000657212,0.00086419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010710014,0.000081612234,0.000015207534,0.00031792294,0.00039250037,0.0013748799,0.00004732928,0.0003986141,0.000028340026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012145317,0.0003022842,0.60465837,0.000015473264,0.000044272387,0.000009510532,0.07574199,0.000009399395,0.0003159426,0.24639988,0.032012198,0.04036923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024522174,0.000029753961,0.08821424,0.000021112346,0.000005517282,0.0000019232211,0.002164608,0.000029440333,0.000041018196,0.0009929369,0.9081576,0.00009665612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5289292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87614536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087547145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004249902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94622743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123290857","doi":"","title":"Securing Accountability through Commissions of Inquiry: A Role for the Law Commission of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Accountability; Law; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.08394092837190328,"score_gpt":0.39724349330661224,"score_spread":0.313302564934709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123290857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074570253,0.00024053165,0.001008122,0.06778511,0.00092945347,0.00028125633,0.000021521413,0.0000111566715,0.9222658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770814,0.00005819864,0.0008740367,0.00069729466,0.00027841795,0.000007344816,0.0000018939365,0.000006241426,0.0003684087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987705,0.00019211555,0.00036137697,0.00007765538,0.00039596608,0.0002023816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792314,0.00091730803,0.00036151952,0.00018715324,0.0005160203,0.00009486063],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001347979,0.0000676152,0.00013221211,0.000014311415,0.0020982078,0.00008407459,0.0003378807,0.00005581553,0.00054602645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050747686,0.000048550733,0.00006389537,0.00024419496,0.000294792,0.0005587803,0.000028746615,0.00037674294,5.453412e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035069294,0.000116673174,0.00077596604,0.00000885512,0.000025351741,3.8729493e-7,0.018595334,0.00007247763,0.00011999304,0.972219,0.0075345743,0.0004963464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022235155,0.000021231177,0.0005118064,0.000035144403,0.00002606297,0.000010238708,0.04149794,0.000041583877,0.0003568652,0.05773006,0.89948225,0.0000644691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96183145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98690224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013871868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015577949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123293857","doi":"","title":"Teaching 'Public Interest Vocationalism': Law as a Case Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy; History","score_opus":0.2809373681209298,"score_gpt":0.4918458174226807,"score_spread":0.2109084493017509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123293857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22010374,0.00012043641,0.000056913348,0.048135743,0.0015274085,0.00045687248,0.0000033323834,0.00021420547,0.7293813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96951723,0.0000015463296,0.000275343,0.0016670363,0.0012609229,0.00010357219,0.000014586169,0.000022343258,0.027137415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997433,0.0011032943,0.0003830684,0.00034417375,0.0003734765,0.00036298097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974183,0.0005110692,0.0001652672,0.00038998932,0.0010478034,0.00046760117],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003220529,0.00016532585,0.00016979233,0.00017869643,0.0015356316,0.00074988144,0.00041500898,0.000110766916,0.0006795386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036348358,0.00016817167,0.000055780736,0.000848887,0.00027886193,0.001733316,0.000109552406,0.00067689497,0.002832985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054686343,0.0011063094,0.0008502677,0.0000037246357,0.000033591612,0.000065081884,0.14485471,2.9344315e-7,0.000004110149,0.82666963,0.022644954,0.0037618813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003839478,0.00007686027,0.000046520938,0.0000071894306,0.00002416357,0.00013553617,0.15856095,0.000016499487,0.00000408766,0.004849989,0.83571243,0.00018184687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059302785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1934411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8218196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031846907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023386744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123295599","doi":"","title":"Educating Lawyers, Cultivating Citizens, and Re-Enchanting the Legal Professional","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Citizenship; Legal profession; Meaning (existential); Incentive; Rubric; Sociology; Law; Public value; Political science; Legal education; Public service; Practice of law; Public relations; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.017421444831573745,"score_gpt":0.34440079464420836,"score_spread":0.3269793498126346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123295599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6155497,0.00072475994,0.0002680287,0.30975813,0.0011331671,0.00032033212,4.9210234e-7,0.000044797376,0.072200656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783203,0.0003971184,0.00036899385,0.0013375932,0.0012539271,0.0000207175,0.000001543275,0.00001033174,0.018289477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769473,0.00036436768,0.00026138246,0.00013037006,0.00033272913,0.0012164284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878085,0.00046949735,0.00028612025,0.000083447194,0.00029882454,0.00008123696],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041183694,0.00008775235,0.00008062267,0.00006352663,0.003219635,0.00063116907,0.00021816543,0.000058235735,0.00040535614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001977213,0.000061752864,0.000036751386,0.00038004186,0.0001454937,0.0012062102,0.000035292218,0.0027072632,0.00003816812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024555015,0.000034101493,0.0050173574,0.000002568319,0.000031304753,1.9848625e-7,0.016120685,9.3732524e-7,0.0003852907,0.9448597,0.006692515,0.02685293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027092054,0.000044032106,0.0038042283,0.000066334505,0.000022664266,0.00013562512,0.62199736,0.00006262635,0.000035203164,0.18743828,0.1858854,0.00023734664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065335687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002860071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7574214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032333672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069054174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123361226","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4469.2006.00025.x","title":"Coffee House: Habitus and Performance Among Law Students","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habitus; Personal unconscious; Sociology; Socialization; Ethnography; Identity (music); Social space; Nothing; Critical ethnography; Cultural capital; Determinism; Law; Unconscious mind; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Social science; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Anthropology; Political science","score_opus":0.04892080162436666,"score_gpt":0.3831022137003443,"score_spread":0.3341814120759776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123361226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76225215,0.000055242905,0.0000061273377,0.0052937134,0.0008832212,0.000145872,0.0000022108647,0.00013994129,0.23122154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99188805,0.000031338954,0.000063930376,0.002199574,0.0018909599,0.000024519875,0.0000063918965,0.000015542257,0.0038797236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988564,0.00013523038,0.00018980757,0.00016402118,0.00039699674,0.0002575355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995184,0.000099013254,0.00011158955,0.00008480213,0.00012686841,0.000059353428],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005253005,0.000087774184,0.00011006131,0.000017212344,0.002022325,0.0004462487,0.0001842053,0.00012117989,0.00016905887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004055396,0.000094998286,0.000029784813,0.0002777884,0.00134124,0.0008504603,0.00004334613,0.00024223837,0.00008426245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068197164,0.00011348904,0.05075934,0.000006834363,0.0000104707615,0.0000010295945,0.023107622,7.103399e-7,0.000014037644,0.9103534,0.015063079,0.000563137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002626724,0.000020493753,0.24672228,0.000008238475,0.000021579908,4.472712e-7,0.0060284953,0.0000021451535,0.0000374423,0.0048785857,0.7418368,0.00018085194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035268273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028372526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90547484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008575486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012309056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123366788","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Secondary Sources","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.045478895536077764,"score_gpt":0.3320937585656241,"score_spread":0.28661486302954636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123366788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000059611743,0.00047342427,0.0000020519765,0.33845875,0.0020541032,0.00015892524,0.00019487219,0.00020753026,0.6584444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031587316,0.00062884827,0.0013844625,0.17898686,0.0054387692,0.000026847285,0.0010779446,0.000053532905,0.80924404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998326,0.00022736243,0.00036254872,0.00032025695,0.00035379615,0.00041001776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846154,0.0003628322,0.00018521579,0.0002350048,0.00013037819,0.0006249991],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030921752,0.00018698127,0.00022030153,0.00023474889,0.0011847726,0.0013705061,0.00068213255,0.00043693944,0.088255696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007281116,0.00018996351,0.00009441494,0.00075349666,0.00028453404,0.0018106034,0.000050328315,0.0011126716,0.0019149169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.96529e-7,0.0000050142326,0.000031797277,0.000012412082,0.000018854178,0.000004677963,0.005054373,8.016414e-8,1.0494247e-7,0.3633951,0.6298704,0.0016066196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003825454,0.000008435463,0.000022203592,0.00002128754,0.000019767484,8.262576e-7,0.009161387,6.7729167e-7,0.0000057001957,0.004500899,0.98596895,0.00025159397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9356017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89607996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35889417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013775581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024380859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123383909","doi":"10.4000/ejpap.543","title":"The Social Dimension of Legal Uncertainty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Dimension (graph theory); Inference; Formative assessment; Syllogism; Philosophy of science; Mill; Element (criminal law); Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.019039231759188008,"score_gpt":0.3139434525350125,"score_spread":0.29490422077582445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123383909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4257066,0.00027372525,0.00023652377,0.3310812,0.00059826457,0.00016874708,0.000004087263,0.000014558151,0.2419163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778867,0.00018352349,0.0005293822,0.00074572867,0.0005193254,6.6639075e-7,4.969858e-7,0.000006974988,0.00022524012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983488,0.00085253816,0.00036042838,0.000055866112,0.0002692334,0.00011317787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838567,0.00029746647,0.0008240099,0.00006660464,0.00034965927,0.00007658919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013115221,0.00005835185,0.00012125464,0.000056571407,0.00068735646,0.00015319276,0.00018545557,0.000007851991,0.00007189521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000478388,0.000039031867,0.00004752359,0.0002904947,0.000814013,0.0005615177,0.000026217172,0.00024256176,0.000020320878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003710431,0.00010996041,0.00039371732,0.000008831712,0.00007156778,0.000008643194,0.030222565,0.000005255072,0.00071557076,0.6945253,0.033369135,0.24053238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005165713,0.00039726277,0.034441773,0.000058796886,0.00004761149,0.00002784871,0.031706244,0.000016532158,0.000027959233,0.020755263,0.9118086,0.00019553141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075645535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014523316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8784395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015706282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017029389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52866596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123404226","doi":"","title":"Learning the 'How' of the Law: Teaching Procedure and Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Underpinning; Vocational education; Subject (documents); Curriculum; Legal education; Civil procedure; Law; Economic Justice; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Common law; Commercial law; Sociology; Mathematics education; Engineering; Computer science; Civil engineering; Mathematics; Library science","score_opus":0.01588365844373171,"score_gpt":0.31845635201931716,"score_spread":0.30257269357558547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123404226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03747223,0.00010860846,0.000023834382,0.22677301,0.00070355774,0.00015727423,2.8008472e-7,0.000010974359,0.7347502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869415,0.000024924231,0.0003277621,0.0018794504,0.00050462666,0.000010157941,4.745341e-7,0.000005881782,0.010305195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891424,0.0004559745,0.00014939773,0.00007144057,0.00027086528,0.00013806288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991338,0.00017728853,0.00026983552,0.00009142979,0.00026637732,0.000061230196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011218966,0.00005596867,0.000058694888,0.000019493466,0.0032421064,0.00084324076,0.00022536697,0.00004702787,0.0002265777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008317078,0.000032400985,0.000035971956,0.00013279224,0.0002487835,0.0013096659,0.000026185422,0.0010816412,0.000009019494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010347172,0.000038687267,0.0008472566,0.0000037862833,0.0000083789755,6.923545e-8,0.0095555745,0.000005155644,0.00016581512,0.980803,0.004292458,0.0042787874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010873022,0.000024969235,0.00384242,0.000056719426,0.000028139224,0.00010696808,0.068112314,0.000032047763,0.00007601707,0.055837285,0.87167776,0.00009660301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11054753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048486818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94946927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041594863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066116394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123472421","doi":"","title":"Counting Outsiders: A Critical Exploration of Outsider Course Enrollment in Canadian Legal Education","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Identity (music); Power (physics); Higher education; Law; Critical theory; Qualitative property; Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.04128973832595409,"score_gpt":0.38645698808643375,"score_spread":0.34516724976047963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123472421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17088148,0.00034071892,0.0008963647,0.18877733,0.0038230217,0.00080897356,0.000015994803,0.000084225714,0.6343719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926063,0.000010459339,0.0011635873,0.004230252,0.0004752671,0.000031002004,0.0000187204,0.000010698485,0.0014537423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833816,0.00016007293,0.00045061522,0.00019608483,0.0004046178,0.00045042523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984911,0.00031683914,0.0001293923,0.00017829107,0.0005220054,0.00036235634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026206907,0.00009428143,0.0001260687,0.00020882399,0.0004049126,0.00024401318,0.00014825669,0.00012292371,0.0007992515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027074818,0.00011059896,0.00003605095,0.00067736034,0.00019632549,0.0027968967,0.000010232037,0.00034726932,0.00012993916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101222195,0.00022906426,0.017700609,0.000011688362,0.000006756939,0.000003276643,0.009964052,0.000012294068,0.000076079414,0.96551055,0.004432786,0.002042709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027283456,0.000029067844,0.015066402,0.00007668803,0.00002254836,0.0000020909058,0.06269634,0.00002506966,0.00028986935,0.0087271985,0.9125443,0.00024757537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88134164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9696082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95678335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005908143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006770577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123497081","doi":"10.29173/alr43","title":"Taking the Instruction of Law Outside the Lecture Hall: How the Flipped Classroom Can Make Learning More Productive and Enjoyable (for Professors and Students)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Flipped classroom; Class (philosophy); Mathematics education; Lecture hall; Legal education; Sociology; Legal writing; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Political science; Legal research; Physics","score_opus":0.0467011691710548,"score_gpt":0.37898964967662696,"score_spread":0.33228848050557214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123497081","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04355625,0.007399264,0.000042742027,0.9035146,0.00055590324,0.0028723339,0.0000024908193,0.000016601936,0.04203982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98890936,0.0027000522,0.00006139576,0.005527124,0.00021448926,0.00015578973,0.0000045495995,0.000009472889,0.0024177665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985686,0.0006957526,0.00017620539,0.00017754646,0.00023030861,0.00015161472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979532,0.0012054439,0.000382564,0.00022035443,0.00021194405,0.000026499174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020664851,0.00009263256,0.00016103982,0.000010012558,0.0015860145,0.00021992633,0.00023749571,0.000044267592,0.000028600844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030920997,0.000045200195,0.000034737957,0.00026637933,0.0005073192,0.0001912642,0.000045783985,0.00034214865,0.0000010760698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005855658,0.000019025734,0.0018225019,0.00024600525,0.000055076824,2.2122189e-8,0.035019413,0.000004092869,0.000012313818,0.9192919,0.00035589468,0.04316787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104301565,0.000019808498,0.001365475,0.00025487656,0.000122019606,0.0000028983025,0.0046320176,0.0000122163365,0.00002185029,0.0015866474,0.9918069,0.00007093502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036107957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13039666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022968017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010551461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123520913","doi":"10.29173/alr41","title":"Experience the Future of Legal Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Legal education; Experiential education; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Legal profession; Argument (complex analysis); Pedagogy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Law; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.02107261499217159,"score_gpt":0.3867919064310887,"score_spread":0.36571929143891707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123520913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009685025,0.013996819,0.000011000148,0.26658314,0.0010252382,0.0002503021,2.5453545e-7,0.000007624963,0.7171571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91576266,0.017580371,0.00020649856,0.05059647,0.0010398838,0.000114861956,0.000007797764,0.000006679209,0.014684786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992137,0.0002672036,0.0001875287,0.00008372415,0.00016193089,0.00008590216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990332,0.0003611463,0.00014961192,0.0002460479,0.0001737563,0.00003624117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006259782,0.00004457672,0.00008971841,0.000008740877,0.00031277962,0.000050200273,0.00023883962,0.000025284058,0.0009278751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008338978,0.000029740382,0.00003878557,0.00039473138,0.00016253619,0.00043984575,0.000010563503,0.0001069411,0.00009764054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.84674e-7,0.000026338193,0.00005928262,0.000051769108,0.0000018008415,3.930522e-9,0.0028211982,2.0719344e-8,0.0000022503327,0.9425082,0.021911284,0.03261753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012407463,0.0000041258213,0.00010694022,0.00015564136,0.000013524533,7.6872436e-7,0.0010538708,3.8540793e-7,0.000008498583,0.0007442275,0.9978599,0.00003972308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038485877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018772213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97594863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015559226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043273746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123524901","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3127041","title":"Reducing the 'Justice Gap' Through Access to Legal Information: Establishing Access to Justice Entry Points at Public Libraries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Public access; Internet privacy; Access to information; Business; Political science; Information access; Criminology; Law and economics; Law; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07484656983269776,"score_gpt":0.3903852212193323,"score_spread":0.3155386513866345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123524901","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05416781,0.00018297715,0.015839359,0.6757905,0.004374483,0.0005019676,0.000006410338,0.00009510777,0.24904142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9487529,0.00053039327,0.00074331753,0.03825418,0.0053597987,0.000035917583,0.000011321894,0.000021816171,0.0062903524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606264,0.00039598087,0.0005300065,0.00021890421,0.00079198735,0.0020004793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972458,0.0007434141,0.0004249212,0.00031360434,0.0009982596,0.00027400468],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004146603,0.00017335408,0.00014942644,0.00025334684,0.0055784006,0.011049164,0.0019531823,0.00010629824,0.0011142009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010391575,0.00014139424,0.000060855175,0.0025990955,0.00019849678,0.041393682,0.0004261883,0.002048776,0.00046102275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007098164,0.000041719264,0.00039539,0.000012693011,0.00005403868,5.5589754e-7,0.04028713,0.000042904718,0.00000922118,0.8264138,0.12512384,0.007547682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017477576,0.00007956654,0.00056478736,0.000029594015,0.00011701242,0.00007436472,0.057568993,0.000016306834,0.00008056504,0.02641877,0.91465896,0.00021630936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017621445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8945851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001563477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013374207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123620114","doi":"10.29173/mlj875","title":"Ethical Lawyering in a Global Community","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Political science; Practice of law; Legal practice; Public relations; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Face (sociological concept); Human rights; Legal profession; Law; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Social science","score_opus":0.07254332960041042,"score_gpt":0.398463203177447,"score_spread":0.32591987357703656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123620114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5523904,0.00001336717,0.000055177275,0.08892747,0.0006301067,0.00008486364,7.036146e-7,0.000024662679,0.35787323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937635,0.000010884312,0.0005882298,0.0052015255,0.00037303937,0.0000065794447,7.0537146e-7,0.0000031054274,0.00005241408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983842,0.00090157223,0.00020283631,0.000046104342,0.000252354,0.00021293307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928313,0.00022201105,0.000081606195,0.0000933929,0.0002010356,0.000118836484],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019055504,0.00004980475,0.000068618305,0.000031622145,0.0016648319,0.00068267935,0.0002545186,0.00012367118,0.0011012341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071854406,0.000048437898,0.000027897973,0.00035118105,0.00016499945,0.00079141237,0.000032517728,0.0025876416,0.00030117904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004495033,0.00015753371,0.014289197,0.0000032944554,0.000008856023,0.0000062789545,0.010275548,0.000007436876,0.000026934093,0.94752294,0.007856515,0.019841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025903454,0.00002671583,0.060412493,0.000029717608,0.000005795198,0.00005760686,0.21675178,0.000017097882,0.000008666739,0.13052699,0.5917519,0.00015222347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5788437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7951461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8169959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003010684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026830242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123663656","doi":"","title":"Governance Gone Wrong: Examining Self-Regulation of the Legal Profession","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Duty of loyalty; Accountability; Duty; Loyalty; Function (biology); Legal profession; Duty of care; Political science; Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Fiduciary; Finance","score_opus":0.02082751628786775,"score_gpt":0.3391165956976519,"score_spread":0.3182890794097841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123663656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8895289,0.0002974025,0.0013426418,0.048064135,0.002075636,0.00021519589,9.641176e-7,0.000039518603,0.05843565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821365,0.00024848914,0.000160123,0.00016359164,0.0009569064,0.0000024903386,4.644862e-7,0.000006571227,0.01632486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983467,0.000287071,0.00022431281,0.00008939555,0.00039265165,0.0006598666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900454,0.00006801502,0.00043665365,0.00012421046,0.0003363534,0.000030217614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026729286,0.000057575544,0.000067144596,0.00003089638,0.0010358414,0.00010206969,0.00027233752,0.00006113356,0.00013163971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005641209,0.00004214201,0.000034818062,0.00054772635,0.00015025254,0.0011245061,0.000022462757,0.0011306353,0.00001820434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013589937,0.00005905028,0.0026819464,0.0000015815025,0.00002539393,3.5172185e-8,0.006513831,0.0000013843174,0.0011242585,0.9784509,0.0006705476,0.010457473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008446023,0.00036069055,0.16209331,0.000117624266,0.0000883424,0.000065520246,0.051799677,0.00009128447,0.0022164553,0.15037939,0.6316281,0.0003150445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013107214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006264455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82807153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000698506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008450564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123686802","doi":"","title":"Incorporating a Creative Component in First-Year Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Rubric; Creativity; Originality; Law and literature; Legal writing; Casebook; Psychology; Tort; Law; The arts; Sociology; Pedagogy; Legal research; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.044264228098679505,"score_gpt":0.355314756831533,"score_spread":0.3110505287328535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123686802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22351448,0.0005953069,0.001388131,0.17752302,0.0009140666,0.00033177945,0.0000018009573,0.00006776135,0.59566367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969115,0.00014317881,0.00037164963,0.00035730112,0.00034404788,0.000005848163,0.0000025865327,0.0000063155326,0.0018575416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983418,0.00026585566,0.00021073688,0.00008932443,0.00029589003,0.000796419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932337,0.00010741038,0.00017491372,0.00006288418,0.00022677607,0.00010462266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042554047,0.0000594714,0.000084153864,0.000093858565,0.00047251533,0.0001579553,0.00016268704,0.000048912603,0.00006669559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007427778,0.000057435456,0.000025648753,0.00048704626,0.000104968465,0.0007373867,0.00001448717,0.0016759877,0.00007412405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016330443,0.00006625908,0.0032239053,4.4040996e-7,0.000011302011,0.0000011106546,0.010751672,0.00002902828,0.0000032638663,0.984944,0.00043954942,0.0005131444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005858363,0.00009400898,0.00043376,0.0000149136495,0.000007052481,0.000022188562,0.14184748,0.000030915886,0.000005323766,0.65690875,0.19993415,0.00011561719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024883673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1718834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.773397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017356433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008062202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99756116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123697437","doi":"","title":"Follow the Drinking Gourd: Our Road to Teaching Critical Race Theory and Slavery and the Law, Contemplatively, at McGill","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical race theory; Race (biology); Sociology; Law; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03033312088957343,"score_gpt":0.39038510647878377,"score_spread":0.36005198558921037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123697437","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23623669,0.0009879261,0.0008870199,0.67619205,0.0007227101,0.00031070376,0.0000028913282,0.00002205163,0.08463797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98674124,0.0004342801,0.00004968439,0.002417773,0.00041603262,0.000008621564,2.4284572e-7,0.000008695001,0.009923448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974337,0.0011918228,0.0001740685,0.00014286737,0.00026529277,0.0007922025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980485,0.001373057,0.00018359024,0.00018320234,0.00011981875,0.00009186375],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014961062,0.000092365466,0.00012253001,0.00003215522,0.012966924,0.00086075487,0.0003765414,0.00005290937,0.000014400518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007646407,0.000054471857,0.000047528432,0.000051891562,0.000442831,0.0008697668,0.000112401416,0.0020481108,0.000014042256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094107745,0.000011199048,0.0004515076,6.564437e-7,0.000047081427,7.0020246e-7,0.011192937,3.2605658e-7,0.000025096284,0.97994745,0.000308808,0.00792012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075072184,0.000053139454,0.0019360897,0.000022731358,0.00006680383,0.00014912877,0.08674091,0.000011714724,0.000008862321,0.70684963,0.20327194,0.00013829951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034428148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024681779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75050455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032583412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008188861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99311525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123737599","doi":"","title":"Women in the Legal Profession","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Feminization (sociology); Remuneration; Inequality; Legal education; Political science; Legal research; Gender inequality; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03134890043543729,"score_gpt":0.3625063205692725,"score_spread":0.3311574201338352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123737599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79573417,0.00019609102,0.00008449582,0.12888645,0.00036490711,0.00010759568,1.49042e-7,0.00001336477,0.07461277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98146015,0.0012716479,0.000013806218,0.0009986687,0.0004379736,0.000012654181,5.125542e-7,0.0000034490015,0.015801128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780273,0.0004339656,0.00014203326,0.000060572616,0.00029699816,0.0012636877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996167,0.0001159843,0.000085997955,0.000069024565,0.000071629715,0.00004065553],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005793308,0.000041649808,0.00004980026,0.000077050165,0.0010989144,0.000080438884,0.00025402856,0.000039875966,0.00014925342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051550445,0.000028460838,0.000022087945,0.00055290863,0.000078180325,0.000668257,0.000006256514,0.0023544608,0.00004966711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012430283,0.00009431684,0.0037715621,3.920092e-7,0.0000073414913,0.0000033294968,0.07980556,0.0000011641487,0.0000133566955,0.9096513,0.00224452,0.0043947194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020921246,0.000053189466,0.005006069,0.0000036126792,0.0000020735195,0.00017774047,0.24128154,0.0000015886712,0.0000020111347,0.12846273,0.624735,0.000065260865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018557553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007435522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78118855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010846376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013583988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123770708","doi":"","title":"The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Beginning to Examine the Implications for Canadian Lawyers' Professional Responsibilities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Law; Dignity; Political science; Impartiality; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.14930393819750493,"score_gpt":0.470061465587707,"score_spread":0.3207575273902021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123770708","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023702676,0.0045992113,0.000019503193,0.96616507,0.00034208826,0.0028001647,0.000069026835,0.000011566083,0.02362309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91711104,0.0013587354,0.00023816935,0.065874815,0.00034395722,0.0022467084,0.000027178683,0.000012094852,0.012787307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983338,0.0008127872,0.00027105125,0.0000954595,0.00017645587,0.00031041395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943734,0.004685422,0.00018552736,0.00033341337,0.0002569229,0.00016534029],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053325915,0.00006380288,0.00011183456,0.000019691088,0.0044814,0.000047102556,0.00020775736,0.000022618455,0.00014023422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019194945,0.000027492055,0.000040761708,0.0004115398,0.00040115314,0.00018282814,0.000008072151,0.00016425134,0.000014238629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007207709,0.000022838158,0.00015065685,0.00011298266,0.000005309276,1.7001702e-9,0.01385414,9.326731e-8,1.7054973e-7,0.9308609,0.05423786,0.0007478889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002816707,0.00003941402,0.0015603743,0.00046665105,0.000011190046,5.011507e-7,0.013704817,2.7878602e-7,7.914217e-7,0.0018802101,0.98226947,0.00003812029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1524342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48438263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92898065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022391995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002125897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123783354","doi":"","title":"Clinical Legal Education in a Dangerous Time","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Injustice; Economic Justice; Political science; Clinical Practice; Legal risk; Law; Legal psychology; Theme (computing); Legal practice; Medicine; Nursing; Business","score_opus":0.020515714529972168,"score_gpt":0.4099396874013594,"score_spread":0.3894239728713872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123783354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48248056,0.0008971721,0.002726747,0.30524233,0.0026700494,0.0002958238,0.000001576967,0.000072443596,0.20561329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9009019,0.0021423283,0.00022283303,0.0008602321,0.0015162062,0.0000066366397,0.0000011295215,0.000009075506,0.094339624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997889,0.00045921732,0.00033406148,0.00012492227,0.00022295694,0.0009698558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918085,0.000282838,0.00017468963,0.00009892895,0.00017428877,0.00008840845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005654249,0.000059486578,0.00009120474,0.00013968664,0.000272564,0.00011351929,0.00021260248,0.00008485979,0.0004727927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016454861,0.000044594966,0.00005335487,0.0003687636,0.00010059748,0.0010119355,0.000009831565,0.0013578612,0.0005427536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013579583,0.00016641982,0.0073002526,2.615363e-7,0.000011148246,4.0788467e-7,0.0005124223,6.941739e-8,0.00005345565,0.6223214,0.003508734,0.36611181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032599404,0.00006611963,0.0034377798,0.000018302362,0.000007974579,0.00004064249,0.003910396,6.520003e-7,0.0000030271722,0.13572727,0.85636455,0.00009730098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019320694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013933832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8528558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011640899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043496262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9619262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123808924","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5007","title":"DESIGNING ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Public administration; Government (linguistics); Relation (database); Political science; Administration of justice; Administrative law; Adaptation (eye); Sociology; Law; Geography; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.24663566810625512,"score_gpt":0.5011033493798046,"score_spread":0.25446768127354946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123808924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02824825,0.000027441354,0.0026608845,0.045402512,0.0016822681,0.00046489786,0.000013091344,0.00006185355,0.9214388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98371804,0.000017871651,0.0060526687,0.0015331547,0.0008559917,0.0000255902,0.0000019024803,0.000012621054,0.0077821785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987929,0.00011908756,0.00024761324,0.00021022146,0.00037953255,0.0002506477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979925,0.00051202934,0.00039380143,0.00043210541,0.00049208035,0.00017747321],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008260603,0.000096151605,0.00014226531,0.00010932868,0.0015903322,0.0009744912,0.0010733124,0.000082409766,0.00078697305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077107633,0.00010332515,0.00003717988,0.00022681437,0.0002658332,0.0021930581,0.00011869079,0.00024138391,0.00020864686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040876606,0.00081758056,0.01142072,0.000559392,0.00020626458,0.00004457287,0.11962212,0.00018009821,0.0071635162,0.6786096,0.15938142,0.021585926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006573102,0.0001809535,0.07827299,0.00023737742,0.0010206859,0.0000026945413,0.048977233,0.000039305236,0.009766467,0.0024343417,0.857738,0.0006726287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025703378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064102764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9554698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055460107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010783436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123843831","doi":"","title":"How do we Regulate Activities within a Charity Law Framework Focussed on Purposes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Public relations","score_opus":0.19313057800454955,"score_gpt":0.3927724950033633,"score_spread":0.19964191699881376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123843831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8383852,0.00006531203,0.000038277816,0.15503564,0.00017770767,0.0003639657,0.000014391464,0.000048356713,0.00587111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722418,0.00014297641,0.0005410267,0.00007969917,0.00021876025,0.000001585303,0.000002330778,0.0000065247186,0.026765293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981568,0.00053455395,0.00010163982,0.00028648096,0.0006541384,0.00026638564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988656,0.00032205175,0.00014949722,0.0001781872,0.00025105383,0.00023362145],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061169954,0.00009127367,0.00015892289,0.00008819562,0.0014432938,0.0004821042,0.00030836006,0.00017483426,0.00007548552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019034045,0.000095841766,0.00004973418,0.0004476647,0.0011329207,0.0010152224,0.00008979024,0.00074093865,0.000012142107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004735393,0.0003030278,0.013010334,0.00034347447,0.00013657939,0.000073433446,0.18979396,0.0000050771982,0.0134847015,0.7733163,0.007226902,0.001832643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078392925,0.0009349723,0.017544193,0.0006391266,0.00006425219,0.000009753793,0.4015814,0.00004055351,0.038225763,0.008899561,0.53070927,0.0005672373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005601725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021134407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76441675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059321286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028190808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123858248","doi":"","title":"The Attorney General as Lawyer (?): Confidentiality Upon Resignation from Cabinet","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Confidentiality; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.05266366982271948,"score_gpt":0.3597360286326949,"score_spread":0.3070723588099754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123858248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32195503,0.0003923011,0.00019951232,0.10459075,0.004834249,0.00045644405,0.0000348184,0.00018598227,0.5673509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622557,0.00003902842,0.00040828544,0.004140748,0.0020319428,0.000040687988,0.000073683186,0.000012234853,0.030997692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789035,0.000711311,0.00028362268,0.00022279422,0.00063140545,0.00026049305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827385,0.0003875586,0.00017747241,0.0003256628,0.0005578004,0.00027767452],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020848052,0.00009779805,0.00009893232,0.00002716599,0.0011482898,0.00090229325,0.0003524796,0.00011976397,0.0015847015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023180998,0.00008196803,0.000044910947,0.000352183,0.00020462723,0.0010514526,0.000036982474,0.00035705185,0.0016092384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027640886,0.000039565966,0.0007636251,7.091056e-7,0.000019208315,0.000001015296,0.0040596183,0.0000124958615,0.00018594351,0.8668059,0.12760815,0.00047608576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002583478,0.000014512728,0.0016637448,0.000004058454,0.000015457364,4.2862087e-7,0.0037674075,0.000021905369,0.00028411185,0.031539597,0.962314,0.00011643181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3143146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11834943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83526635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021637745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012890433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123927232","doi":"","title":"REGULATING LAW FIRMS IN CANADA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public law; Law; Commercial law; Private law; Comparative law; Business; Municipal law; Audit; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.07193141210284187,"score_gpt":0.36025841307170736,"score_spread":0.2883270009688655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123927232","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001911206,0.018595407,1.9054262e-7,0.49976113,0.00045786568,0.00027025054,0.000003997399,0.0000053977524,0.47899455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496097,0.0014045591,0.000027466584,0.04719535,0.00016967331,0.000015988799,0.0000035331987,0.0000038557773,0.0015698567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919116,0.00021879052,0.00013453033,0.000044873672,0.00013534061,0.00027530882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943054,0.00011896199,0.00005017512,0.00013893654,0.000044934197,0.00021644066],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001364989,0.000037605598,0.00007018953,0.000017035964,0.0005127171,0.000036925783,0.00015694402,0.000016308893,0.0016558033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006164683,0.00002921848,0.00001255323,0.00042999373,0.000047185596,0.00025865837,0.000004680812,0.00016962975,0.0001041146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7564956e-8,0.0000021486453,0.00402523,0.000034655073,0.0000021752453,4.4846462e-7,0.0023395312,4.615531e-7,1.1397705e-7,0.90977883,0.07518537,0.008630968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001086727,3.233582e-7,0.0041183173,0.00013149106,0.000004871896,8.62808e-7,0.00058310333,6.344553e-7,3.62882e-7,0.00019284233,0.99491304,0.00004327778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94769853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001286295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009541536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123949424","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Case Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.07285255859072085,"score_gpt":0.3677765656678758,"score_spread":0.29492400707715494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123949424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022586712,0.00017180631,0.0000020691207,0.33553633,0.0020322215,0.00018306423,0.00016414303,0.00017931104,0.6617288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015709495,0.00028578992,0.0023562335,0.29288054,0.005149439,0.00003842928,0.0008196822,0.00006218814,0.6826982],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984357,0.00023264569,0.0003464159,0.0003037188,0.00029158653,0.0003899538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983934,0.0003673874,0.00015017086,0.0002646866,0.00015660253,0.00066775765],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029772436,0.00017470395,0.00019514532,0.00014036553,0.0015079145,0.0014416158,0.00043585434,0.00041060947,0.033547875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000501701,0.00017808686,0.00007428924,0.0007394572,0.0003115431,0.0020028013,0.00004199231,0.0008185003,0.0014798552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.9843462e-7,0.000005165444,0.000002610021,0.000007198856,0.000011971444,0.00023509558,0.0031152766,8.068213e-8,4.727883e-8,0.48843196,0.50797397,0.00021623562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036457517,0.000007800686,4.6578168e-7,0.000015443782,0.000024766014,0.000039789993,0.0071347826,0.0000014053968,0.0000034258294,0.0047381907,0.9877626,0.00023488904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99222296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48369378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017269206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011507426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123960466","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4719","title":"Anything Goes: An Apology for Parallel Distributed Legal Science","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Interpretation (philosophy); Legal realism; Legal science; Strengths and weaknesses; Value (mathematics); Legal profession; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06997384762087296,"score_gpt":0.4117177567235346,"score_spread":0.34174390910266167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123960466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20740809,0.00003085909,0.121971294,0.26624423,0.0039258017,0.0011878157,0.00017406253,0.0005511256,0.39850673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99202895,0.00000924621,0.0034751906,0.0024925282,0.0002610121,0.00004174694,0.00001675026,0.0000029968453,0.0016715829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990049,0.000039146435,0.00020414537,0.00013573094,0.00022091396,0.00039517635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989743,0.00026479742,0.00012376255,0.00014450206,0.00035993694,0.00013267933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014034581,0.00006362715,0.00007253938,0.00009784841,0.0011752881,0.00032727598,0.00037615077,0.00007128949,0.00030587421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027129923,0.000043450906,0.000027286294,0.00051010837,0.0007487692,0.005103313,0.00003182666,0.00010106537,0.00009797441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018841034,0.000030900002,0.000516796,0.0000016677359,0.0000023149435,3.2592106e-7,0.0033241003,0.0000070214946,0.00024091157,0.9823414,0.0012293507,0.012286335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026057052,0.00009624582,0.0026784553,0.0000041270787,0.000004200894,0.000003420975,0.004294962,0.000054096516,0.000087583176,0.010871442,0.98152596,0.00011894946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079262943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044355955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9802966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098768774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013596182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9039485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124038656","doi":"","title":"Evaluating the Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning As a Method of Engaging Year One Law Students.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Student engagement; Curriculum; Perception; Psychology; Work (physics); Mathematics education; Focus group; Problem-based learning; Medical education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social psychology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.2895863813078582,"score_gpt":0.5279764536715095,"score_spread":0.23839007236365128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124038656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.678587,0.00003885971,0.001754968,0.00357804,0.00021288177,0.0015882702,0.000009627334,0.000086292894,0.31414405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907061,0.00001671843,0.005528701,0.000044615645,0.00014600667,0.000010272385,0.000014253512,0.000020937188,0.0035123962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818209,0.014808822,0.00034203252,0.00035497188,0.0022063884,0.0004668985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890465,0.006680189,0.00034437096,0.00042296975,0.0032887035,0.00021724694],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039181564,0.00013051016,0.00029405396,0.00051373505,0.0012996349,0.000157182,0.0010500139,0.0001310496,0.00016522742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007679936,0.00012671994,0.00011580107,0.0030249949,0.0008184604,0.0006155647,0.00025601906,0.0013088195,0.00003940984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012570864,0.0005246261,0.07054549,0.00015728213,0.00022753897,0.000008499111,0.022509191,0.0015264248,0.0018686524,0.89413935,0.000056147233,0.007179693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01662697,0.004734942,0.054699056,0.0018588002,0.0008197432,0.0000063118655,0.22390975,0.0024856615,0.008635887,0.07428398,0.6101799,0.0017590055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042079877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043561365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8198554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003160476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004650789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124172935","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Youth Overrepresentation in Canadian Correctional Services: Judicial and Non-Judicial Actors and Influence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial opinion; Criminology; Judicial discretion; Judicial review; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.01578057304518472,"score_gpt":0.349938155960879,"score_spread":0.3341575829156943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124172935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857962,0.00018114889,0.000041231462,0.006036451,0.0007390078,0.000102062295,0.000004322407,0.000008943585,0.0070906323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787724,0.00078397285,0.000020499063,0.0004658418,0.0006156125,0.000003301723,0.00000747315,0.0000059511276,0.00022011453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982392,0.00013657636,0.00018840226,0.00013791614,0.0002988414,0.0009990586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991818,0.000058233745,0.0001230338,0.000044597713,0.00025853838,0.00033381153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00227212,0.00007785348,0.00008632982,0.00026019473,0.0005059985,0.00026056365,0.00010177589,0.00008030739,0.000021331654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024791402,0.000083261475,0.000013052577,0.00050889695,0.00011058934,0.0014196234,0.000005824155,0.0011798202,0.000007635898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077408855,0.000046014673,0.7607633,0.0000030198698,0.000030542345,0.0000031938816,0.11270591,0.00006586126,0.000020363212,0.12201317,0.00018795105,0.00408329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017596037,0.00023210779,0.33616155,0.00005371049,0.0000624396,0.00015026347,0.46022806,0.00017224513,0.000008683554,0.13488851,0.065833926,0.00044888366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88192564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9763885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4246017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014701366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024204504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98132735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124202993","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.16.2.373","title":"Canada: Depending on the Kindness of Strangers—Access to Civil Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Kindness; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.16969157696549309,"score_gpt":0.4332841545108171,"score_spread":0.263592577545324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124202993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0391495,0.0000059144822,0.00017590748,0.6796397,0.0012885246,0.0002798622,0.000009615197,0.000016419412,0.2794346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642591,0.0000072009975,0.00007982776,0.033104822,0.00022824336,0.00002737294,0.0000016780326,0.0000059602417,0.0022858249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986099,0.00028510613,0.00016762642,0.000112406124,0.0006332685,0.00019171319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645317,0.0026653227,0.00010461416,0.00017205445,0.00050973566,0.000095080984],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011129426,0.000061780396,0.000072363124,0.000046416557,0.00082693575,0.0003493523,0.0004440406,0.00010276981,0.0014088048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006537999,0.0000480592,0.000018727998,0.00065366074,0.000117900665,0.0006325941,0.000029316583,0.00096688553,0.000053067088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036134572,0.000029306688,0.00014821594,0.000018581424,0.000009160796,7.481873e-7,0.018220866,0.000072803705,0.00007333721,0.8865423,0.094148606,0.0007324711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000467898,0.000014090637,0.003680551,0.000032911517,0.000021765292,3.6731655e-7,0.020542271,0.000016732132,0.00039533916,0.001591545,0.9735478,0.00010981717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9660031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9709498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92510957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013484881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060788924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124205390","doi":"","title":"Transcending Boundaries in Legal Education: A Vehicle for Teaching Students to Think Critically","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Curriculum; Engineering ethics; Politics; State (computer science); Sociology; Pedagogy; Perspective (graphical); Agile software development; Political science; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.015757752838406313,"score_gpt":0.39612800262886216,"score_spread":0.38037024979045586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124205390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58942664,0.00026576445,0.008967703,0.37670586,0.0014705632,0.00081288384,0.0000013177907,0.000044396726,0.02230488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871176,0.00005263894,0.0012771843,0.00340093,0.00067713554,0.00007761829,0.0000018856787,0.00001141979,0.0073836125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978101,0.00020191672,0.00027924188,0.00013830983,0.00035279946,0.0012176161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917716,0.00019436998,0.000066285014,0.00007851864,0.00035329186,0.00013034976],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035814734,0.0000798511,0.00009807654,0.00017693065,0.0016915292,0.0017720384,0.0003496981,0.000056284935,0.00016095208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019318905,0.00008100281,0.000049438488,0.00031086858,0.0000934484,0.0016836212,0.0000107834085,0.0017296015,0.000056321856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012073462,0.00020283669,0.0018354217,0.0000026532948,0.000017008235,1.1644903e-7,0.024469826,0.0000015687109,0.00009932097,0.94898456,0.0023041584,0.02207044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036242645,0.0001257017,0.0027680607,0.0000313531,0.000015407693,0.000016328864,0.15606341,0.0000097285365,0.000009210399,0.3180259,0.5224069,0.00016564656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008468035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018712245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6309587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012066562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017493838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124351038","doi":"","title":"Bend or Break: Enhancing the Responsibilities of Law Societies to Promote Access to Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Legal profession; Professional responsibility; Sociology","score_opus":0.10084808654946732,"score_gpt":0.41099297546435853,"score_spread":0.3101448889148912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124351038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43264446,0.00010534576,0.00020642146,0.2140093,0.0017951769,0.0010319435,0.000037287406,0.00012735213,0.35004273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94502586,0.000007735261,0.0023690069,0.019928787,0.00067994546,0.0000863211,0.0000032893677,0.000015686419,0.031883366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981269,0.0003824064,0.00035670656,0.00023127267,0.0005888448,0.00031383912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756616,0.0008085862,0.00013893287,0.00038618446,0.0007905321,0.0003096085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029921453,0.00011112148,0.00016031788,0.00005539095,0.0008744142,0.0006544372,0.00064084464,0.00008300537,0.0007152985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007023557,0.00008179378,0.000045018234,0.0008794618,0.0002906161,0.0014070959,0.00014860407,0.00030174572,0.00026775163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016998379,0.00008753107,0.00009822697,0.000037537087,0.000023155382,0.0000011620225,0.1227353,0.000073171876,0.00056456233,0.7749661,0.100717105,0.000526159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011892997,0.000078621815,0.00025634735,0.000042165688,0.000034047698,0.0000012147073,0.054685887,0.0000021459907,0.0032570916,0.0072565996,0.93412954,0.00013740512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03369478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0828016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8334124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017300731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019238598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97273993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124390615","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice Online: Are Canadian Court Websites Accessible to Users with Visual Impairments?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Economic Justice; Internet privacy; Political science; Diversity (politics); Public relations; Web accessibility; Business; The Internet; Law; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.04136730038291625,"score_gpt":0.39472268862887394,"score_spread":0.3533553882459577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124390615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72859263,0.000014992316,0.00012754653,0.1534209,0.0014421069,0.00070598896,0.000093384886,0.00014265232,0.11545981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93441236,0.0000058302867,0.0022112369,0.05249783,0.001575664,0.000051026505,0.000027473488,0.000024954117,0.009193641],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981761,0.00013163858,0.00023326282,0.00036506855,0.00048657297,0.00060735934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737847,0.00013985967,0.00012877124,0.00029134276,0.0008168626,0.001244691],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005200728,0.00016064518,0.00015491982,0.0002458178,0.0016505622,0.0016072241,0.0007160323,0.000101218895,0.0050628474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001054089,0.00015253064,0.000027891929,0.0019718325,0.00016666148,0.0023909488,0.00007526415,0.00031876384,0.002514955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015047585,0.00045780308,0.16351558,0.000037243775,0.00009346826,0.000030250985,0.0140817575,0.00008299477,0.00013882724,0.033061616,0.7870921,0.0012579227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018632367,0.000130355,0.05808638,0.00005326126,0.000043639488,0.000001848942,0.0126393195,0.000008620177,0.00010994089,0.000103347826,0.92836946,0.0002674728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58687896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9672584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38037944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004628291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003002121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124425142","doi":"","title":"Legal Inquiry: A Liberal Arts Experiment in Demystifying Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal arts education; Legal education; Vocabulary; Law; The arts; Legal research; Sociology; Legal profession; Critical thinking; Legal writing; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Pedagogy; Higher education; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06575299486152254,"score_gpt":0.3291856381937362,"score_spread":0.26343264333221367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124425142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11431509,0.0000011361775,0.00007358362,0.0074295597,0.00044567956,0.00052058266,0.0000015404382,0.0001177629,0.87709504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99515957,0.00198188,0.0010814007,0.0010811577,0.00021652988,0.000014835932,0.0000074103777,0.000011859984,0.00044536238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987504,0.0002388184,0.00015838284,0.00025683577,0.00024143039,0.00035413232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934083,0.00013312043,0.0000970995,0.00017781847,0.00015350126,0.000097638425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002780964,0.00011777534,0.00012455913,0.0034433927,0.0004847946,0.00030134356,0.00027623418,0.00010361459,0.00050106493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014022783,0.0001357155,0.000048560985,0.0064960676,0.00019373841,0.0028235808,0.000074180425,0.0003196198,0.0001742346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029436505,0.00039818385,0.0008035047,0.0000108201075,0.000027320319,0.000040245654,0.21437268,0.000009841291,0.00004271343,0.77217406,0.0042149997,0.007876173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033443564,0.000021941927,0.00018897634,0.000016770033,0.000008226806,0.0000013247035,0.025128424,0.000022191101,0.000114346665,0.000012670922,0.97398365,0.00016705951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69535273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15699299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96976864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000443191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011117224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8583897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124470084","doi":"","title":"The Teaching of Procedure Across Common Law Systems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Scholarship; Legal education; Economic Justice; Subject (documents); Legal profession; Legal research; Political science; Curriculum; Legal history; Empirical legal studies; Civil procedure; Sociology","score_opus":0.03524496154442219,"score_gpt":0.41586941710367215,"score_spread":0.38062445555924995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124470084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16373715,0.000045339046,0.0000192242,0.062281184,0.00045939666,0.00025380534,7.721132e-7,0.000037840222,0.7731653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97674155,0.000004735586,0.00004719595,0.0005702575,0.00010396009,0.00002888376,6.9923885e-7,0.0000021584058,0.02250056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994276,0.00013520972,0.00013005557,0.000044357992,0.0001483644,0.00011437112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992569,0.0003802476,0.00008431279,0.00009607795,0.00015489697,0.000027560334],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009048381,0.00002589447,0.000040043153,0.0000056787576,0.0013110396,0.0003935827,0.00015401708,0.000030041007,0.00009411513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034195956,0.000015948099,0.000012746845,0.00012100645,0.00015342963,0.00053631817,0.000012624715,0.0001592592,0.00008815412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.699171e-7,0.000016822893,0.0010382046,0.0000034050156,0.0000032614148,9.376412e-9,0.018439872,0.0000012868686,0.000024215677,0.962121,0.017367719,0.0009838036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027682767,0.000005042024,0.0013120032,0.0000058135442,0.0000015173247,3.352695e-7,0.118810385,0.000032454074,0.000022461956,0.0032099853,0.8765388,0.000033500408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11709151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009850077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95891106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002001528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001308236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124613849","doi":"","title":"Transforming Students, Transforming Self: The Power of Teaching Social Justice Struggles in Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Globalization; Context (archaeology); Sustainability; Sociology; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Political science; Convergence (economics); Political economy; Economic growth; Law; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.04755250597346342,"score_gpt":0.3019058795186739,"score_spread":0.2543533735452105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124613849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7911773,0.000029915798,0.00026841875,0.013523478,0.00028133145,0.00030232978,0.000019392906,0.000023396815,0.19437449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988313,0.000015553229,0.00031215753,0.000076066586,0.000020037385,5.179946e-7,9.801186e-7,0.0000052437167,0.0007381939],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984739,0.0006294644,0.00017976081,0.000112024216,0.00041805647,0.00018681718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913615,0.0002647196,0.00019453956,0.00019724261,0.00016841185,0.000038949023],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020418619,0.000078565936,0.00014076143,0.00012629395,0.0021199172,0.000098939105,0.0010410546,0.000092258495,0.00019021422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020285047,0.00006781906,0.000114794704,0.00060759543,0.00036315733,0.0022469156,0.000055261164,0.00086129486,0.0000055661003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003380608,0.00023748678,0.012164221,0.000011143872,0.00004268803,7.4488827e-7,0.812792,4.4787274e-7,0.00022221962,0.17162202,0.0003229828,0.0025502283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003327833,0.000019901412,0.02803962,0.000032983808,0.00010573626,7.565168e-7,0.8980998,0.000002366953,0.00008299725,0.0010991985,0.07209055,0.00009329308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010788832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018302038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.207654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009846622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003217458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124858383","doi":"","title":"A False Start in Constitutionalizing Lawyer Loyalty in Canada (Attorney General) v. Federation of Law Societies of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Duty; Supreme court; Constitutionality; Principle of legality; Political science; Charter; Economic Justice; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06657278010876357,"score_gpt":0.3278317341651744,"score_spread":0.26125895405641086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124858383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17353848,0.025158087,0.0014004493,0.2968894,0.0033322661,0.00412684,0.006939601,0.0000699457,0.48854494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99410266,0.0016136186,0.00009692276,0.0036293792,0.00006977382,0.00005387358,0.000040000294,0.0000044636176,0.00038932884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710554,0.00055676827,0.00086527393,0.0002524855,0.0008792467,0.00034070326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968036,0.0010431595,0.0003603999,0.00024563062,0.001440635,0.000106580075],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014545955,0.00017932782,0.0003973611,0.000040980904,0.00051103794,0.000037598395,0.00033781413,0.000063490894,0.00075368205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014670725,0.00013079352,0.000060907958,0.00036057993,0.002932627,0.000754911,0.000053469423,0.0002513989,0.0000031962213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020770027,0.000044689477,0.0014566995,0.00011365148,0.000018263097,0.00001097284,0.00038385054,0.00009186043,0.00010011555,0.98572195,0.011955973,0.000081199316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005978078,0.000029937426,0.001238126,0.00227213,0.00004884595,0.00003593277,0.0033335832,0.000029826244,0.00042809985,0.00853952,0.983039,0.00040714175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99777436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99976164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97718245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010849384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04989651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124874323","doi":"10.1002/alt.20184","title":"The next frontier is anticipation: Thinking ahead about conflict to help clients find constructive ways to engage issues in advance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Constructive; Frontier; Conflict resolution; Dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Law; Process (computing); Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0723621853721421,"score_gpt":0.4166558202737395,"score_spread":0.34429363490159737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124874323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8475264,0.0001458048,0.019206017,0.11597792,0.0018080339,0.0015027657,0.000039256192,0.000028502238,0.01376531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878081,0.00009804027,0.005219358,0.0049609244,0.00036791476,0.000078238954,0.0000097821985,0.000010291413,0.0014473482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998099,0.000277941,0.00045329944,0.00024626992,0.0006147071,0.00030872476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974846,0.001242707,0.000274792,0.00025529406,0.00062565604,0.00011691663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00264253,0.00011640271,0.00014640369,0.00017008258,0.0009247478,0.00027132244,0.000455832,0.000049094,0.00009806149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025339148,0.00009086228,0.00003183809,0.0009992619,0.0002000172,0.0009190273,0.0000613205,0.00027028547,0.00010103594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012823041,0.00007675913,0.007930702,0.000005558149,0.00003309351,8.337235e-7,0.45044598,0.00026002046,0.000687419,0.49579602,0.0031282865,0.04150708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030975285,0.00009123455,0.16117437,0.00014082438,0.000010986322,4.340936e-7,0.041106954,0.000037887155,0.009323481,0.010519127,0.7770935,0.00019143375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004917783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033918924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77396524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018957816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017008558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.743425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124888583","doi":"10.7202/1074152ar","title":"Governing A.I.’s Professional Advice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Legal advice; Order (exchange); Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Professional association; Legal profession; Psychology; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.06806531519421341,"score_gpt":0.3834765777206284,"score_spread":0.31541126252641494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124888583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00082390185,0.00002089063,0.000039991464,0.23687626,0.0009828438,0.000042120395,0.000007542726,0.00004951134,0.7611569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797316,0.000021093176,0.0013068529,0.015181445,0.0012688189,0.0000024364415,0.0000022656081,0.0000069314387,0.0024785157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900967,0.00019086302,0.00017373131,0.0000800574,0.00038001523,0.00016569292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992476,0.00012602014,0.00015549756,0.000038512866,0.00020687527,0.00022547386],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005597613,0.000047291007,0.000059175618,0.000015569669,0.005357824,0.00014864517,0.00016326024,0.000044656856,0.003500188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084455096,0.000042825963,0.00003651928,0.00028112603,0.00006364209,0.00089921395,0.000019998937,0.0006909184,0.0004695537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014692267,0.000042958414,0.00025325007,0.0000029431521,0.000012250256,0.000007785841,0.0060763187,0.0000074401746,0.0000479312,0.9425692,0.048034422,0.002930785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011753942,0.0000133725125,0.0001823262,0.000008105173,0.0000057595335,0.000009515358,0.005680171,0.00001536327,0.000020231728,0.00046454964,0.99342203,0.00006105311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018738756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035686458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97890776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007565058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015010173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124894602","doi":"","title":"SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FOR ETHICS COUNSEL: LESSONS FOR CANADA FROM THE UNITED STATES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Jurisprudence; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Legal ethics; Subject (documents); Position (finance); Sociology; Business; Library science; History","score_opus":0.14173140897240344,"score_gpt":0.4145599334617979,"score_spread":0.2728285244893945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124894602","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000631437,0.003801466,0.00006062773,0.99011576,0.0006706967,0.0020993412,0.0005064908,0.000012252197,0.0021019229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12412835,0.04599434,0.00052343355,0.8145162,0.0016587317,0.0026260025,0.0012960115,0.000054733693,0.009202188],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987804,0.00034338617,0.0002124917,0.00011661294,0.0002253849,0.00032168694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952725,0.0033479654,0.00013438013,0.00028839684,0.0007307099,0.0002260392],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018018172,0.00008346904,0.00012274906,0.000021505983,0.0022366007,0.00022671606,0.0004732069,0.000059850077,0.00083765324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003647466,0.000052021227,0.00004550684,0.00040878187,0.0001430124,0.00013508838,0.0000068593677,0.00032793064,0.00004410053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.5848024e-7,0.0000028439567,0.000015591688,0.000040429328,0.000015076825,4.659616e-8,0.0045673144,0.0000024219794,2.2232865e-7,0.18478318,0.80909103,0.0014814725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043444066,0.000004202028,0.00025868654,0.00015250695,0.00004729781,1.7169012e-7,0.0023463783,0.000047728652,6.7492596e-7,0.003498729,0.99351853,0.00008167223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18442747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004989107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014146167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124903039","doi":"","title":"Risk Regulation for the Legal Profession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Normative; Political science; Law; Legal ethics; Public interest; Legal research; Complaint; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.030637421093672252,"score_gpt":0.4065176327351543,"score_spread":0.37588021164148205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124903039","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05856387,0.0010397645,0.06810734,0.8011635,0.0051758597,0.00094461115,0.0000048677202,0.00005867902,0.064941496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96654576,0.0016722007,0.00012079578,0.0001560956,0.0014686468,0.000016755914,0.0000012415861,0.0000060087214,0.03001249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872756,0.00014844781,0.00013206968,0.0000738185,0.00020828238,0.0007098457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988209,0.0002611261,0.0004480281,0.0001902568,0.00024626995,0.000033407287],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005646121,0.000045473338,0.000045386194,0.000030588883,0.009021056,0.00065703987,0.00037924133,0.000051259838,0.00008411462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027306473,0.000030614327,0.000052404048,0.00006728384,0.0001104431,0.001165062,0.000013211735,0.0013747925,0.000019217458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021643973,0.000017311744,0.001215573,4.3899215e-7,0.000024310319,2.8406665e-8,0.0016262133,0.0000032898263,0.000020076768,0.9286442,0.0027308818,0.065696046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021882675,0.000031919386,0.007239792,0.000005480554,0.000030845596,0.000006068725,0.013103108,0.00009313128,0.000010298145,0.3763016,0.60290563,0.00005329642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033132439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01878923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9079819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037689123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061964993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124921385","doi":"","title":"Bridging The Gaps: How Cross-Disciplinary Training with MBAs Can Improve Transactional Education, Prepare Students for Private Practice, and Enhance University Life.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham journal of corporate & financial law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Practice of law; Apprenticeship; Legal profession; Casual; Legal writing; Sociology; Political science; Legal research; Psychology","score_opus":0.046291591885357905,"score_gpt":0.3496655658359715,"score_spread":0.3033739739506136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124921385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9369515,0.00018532117,0.008929684,0.04846143,0.0012991823,0.0005773553,0.00004610242,0.000019939249,0.0035294692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922908,0.00016891136,0.0034714986,0.00091956643,0.00082846626,0.000009149753,0.0000066581733,0.000011802548,0.0022931336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987085,0.00015663827,0.0002773081,0.0001656153,0.0004689075,0.00022302775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996692,0.0002229566,0.0012548516,0.00010733277,0.0015674264,0.00015544542],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011770758,0.00011864407,0.00017437973,0.00007697661,0.0023580175,0.00029435434,0.00028931836,0.00007049123,0.000016059334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078952993,0.00009700807,0.00006249162,0.00044714144,0.00055745593,0.0024303473,0.00001725377,0.0003529508,5.824133e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041836933,0.0017391689,0.029007632,0.00014560879,0.00034508036,0.00011725278,0.17828324,0.00039199975,0.00040148452,0.74581414,0.023019694,0.016550984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012993576,0.00064,0.035330493,0.0001546677,0.00015129888,0.00028783592,0.02047486,0.000016274998,0.00020498455,0.005587241,0.93551,0.00034298655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002301664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014333264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9124903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014096004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007074972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124966618","doi":"","title":"Law School as Social Innovation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Juncture; Framing (construction); Common core; Political science; Legal education; Law; Core (optical fiber); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.028580532272803216,"score_gpt":0.3905321881812325,"score_spread":0.36195165590842926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124966618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11544699,0.00007976158,0.0014455691,0.14085515,0.0012267132,0.00012469974,7.6931e-7,0.00007534743,0.740745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973959,0.000121848956,0.00008115812,0.0042203036,0.004660994,0.0000040182663,0.0000031076909,0.000009184724,0.016940372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801886,0.00017775546,0.00023768249,0.00010349466,0.00035334507,0.0011088857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998776,0.000046342393,0.00020795505,0.000066062246,0.0008474556,0.0000561687],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034067174,0.000065877626,0.00006612503,0.00014610446,0.0025065753,0.00032842907,0.00021302009,0.00008855798,0.0015235353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010256364,0.0000665371,0.00003266375,0.0012728459,0.00025828753,0.0011024019,0.00001185869,0.0018591129,0.001000628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012815252,0.000033157856,0.0001508821,3.1991505e-7,0.000024090536,1.7017116e-7,0.0032048894,4.5115225e-8,0.00011620349,0.98518485,0.00450882,0.0067637404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011817978,0.00005427317,0.00013471158,0.0000015455216,0.000006600721,0.000015079578,0.010434757,4.9865343e-7,0.00003317411,0.47018757,0.51895297,0.00006062726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038340348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015345209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85851204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010362864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014831814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125182210","doi":"","title":"Of Academics and Professionals: The Difference Is in the Pay","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manager","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Order (exchange); Higher education; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Economics; Business; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.06273445515939466,"score_gpt":0.40595902039232756,"score_spread":0.3432245652329329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125182210","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1809113,0.000025226665,0.00013500157,0.7275569,0.00015124018,0.00014142797,7.08528e-7,0.0000052661253,0.09107297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824285,0.00002635684,0.000043689717,0.010968586,0.00005411121,0.000009680825,3.0072263e-7,0.0000010072322,0.006467769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947226,0.00023627064,0.00006853612,0.000043715656,0.00012468989,0.00005451399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992599,0.00058274006,0.00004619259,0.00007925094,0.000024301366,0.000007629751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001181172,0.000019978623,0.00002764767,0.000018672912,0.00016423373,0.000033676733,0.00015365276,0.00002757901,0.000089492125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005146701,0.0000086878945,0.000006222093,0.00024443283,0.000105160536,0.000088454646,0.000016970116,0.00019451267,0.0000061555406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014651405,0.00003228113,0.020277383,0.000005895691,0.0000024213546,4.6891817e-8,0.099341914,1.6894764e-7,0.000013197088,0.834402,0.022399865,0.023523314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027082177,0.0000021790229,0.19693787,0.0000053875947,0.00000282609,7.714497e-8,0.016647711,0.00002763669,0.00000772065,0.015547277,0.7707737,0.00002051794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008028172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003606298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81885475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004028202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003768733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12631696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125356111","doi":"","title":"Peer Review in Canada: Results from a Promising Experiment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Skepticism; Peer review; Political science; Criminal justice; Public relations; Legal profession; Competence (human resources); Quality assurance; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Service (business)","score_opus":0.10960221156646799,"score_gpt":0.37515587183563265,"score_spread":0.26555366026916466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125356111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052586463,0.0023569579,0.000009887093,0.26065353,0.00065833057,0.00013482498,0.000011734606,0.000009267552,0.73090684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98883706,0.0019770395,0.001097671,0.004310908,0.0003807334,0.000004333551,0.0000113350825,0.000006040403,0.0033748818],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981484,0.00026606972,0.00041063197,0.00012034638,0.00083968154,0.0002149031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887496,0.00017034993,0.00022513048,0.000116146075,0.00046763298,0.00014579634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014157419,0.00006720876,0.00012748476,0.000027653212,0.00084121525,0.00009666094,0.00017881356,0.00003232805,0.0007973369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001801811,0.00006269083,0.000029179275,0.0002565838,0.000055696568,0.00052595115,0.000012524303,0.0005343954,0.00002442603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007025082,0.00028455458,0.0016404416,0.000018497449,0.000048036236,0.00031522516,0.06324526,0.000024818086,0.00013014782,0.29056868,0.6382193,0.005434831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039230962,0.0000069014072,0.0013406548,0.00028381997,0.000007937852,0.000041038624,0.0049124663,0.000004149813,0.00007136576,0.0021636863,0.99065685,0.00011882607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99843895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99890757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9835784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087220926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065888856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125409677","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007432","title":"Revisiting the<i>Arthurs Report</i>Twenty Years Later","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Legal education; Institution; Law; Reputation; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.02481115879235112,"score_gpt":0.30914512783126363,"score_spread":0.2843339690389125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125409677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58667135,0.0009657403,0.00008451512,0.11148049,0.002871359,0.00025294555,0.000027474163,0.000015462949,0.29763067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98410743,0.00017589873,0.0003680307,0.009417237,0.0006576464,0.000003037335,0.0000045081592,0.000014778444,0.005251455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986065,0.0002545159,0.0004122992,0.00014204065,0.000119401455,0.00046522537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792916,0.00030210457,0.00041013924,0.00016859116,0.00041658175,0.00077341305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035197446,0.00009812611,0.00018934536,0.00004295027,0.0012055474,0.00034806607,0.000195525,0.00012260547,0.00038805552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012350323,0.00009592468,0.000180577,0.00030917165,0.00047995494,0.0005628389,0.0000053638882,0.0006363031,0.000004030967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.184323e-7,0.0000035565242,0.0010910637,0.000009340227,0.000054941436,0.00011188926,0.0850484,0.000005607745,0.0000050191293,0.9068526,0.005127169,0.001689713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014602083,0.000010464928,0.0014779243,0.00003926057,0.00004129038,0.00032678706,0.043499377,0.0000021710541,0.0000032422868,0.00986621,0.9444641,0.00012314918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10420138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43339482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93933696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046879513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035704423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9272218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125450144","doi":"","title":"The Cost of Seeking Civil Justice in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Seekers; Political science; Civil rights; Business; Public economics; Criminology; Public administration; Economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.035260724157887606,"score_gpt":0.28367459786428906,"score_spread":0.24841387370640144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125450144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9178113,0.000059685965,0.00007294897,0.03911334,0.0006773399,0.00020056775,0.000028290582,0.000012568258,0.04202401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99381125,0.00008931787,0.00008253503,0.00015905879,0.00005585617,3.795855e-7,0.000001666354,0.0000050189874,0.005794894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985862,0.0003508368,0.00017188824,0.00015268815,0.00047102486,0.00026738155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978091,0.001203298,0.00027203624,0.00023282053,0.00038382973,0.00009887683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014367535,0.00007084019,0.00012466028,0.00010466937,0.000909799,0.00002458424,0.00053420826,0.00007307792,0.0007885486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018277441,0.00006138431,0.000042429023,0.0007540081,0.0003165237,0.0008910632,0.000078939,0.00025612136,0.000026072334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002561952,0.00013186235,0.87758434,0.0000489148,0.00007609043,0.000017265746,0.026707375,0.00001891,0.0044769957,0.0568995,0.011582933,0.02219964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064321695,0.000014592194,0.5141666,0.00008621018,0.000044490393,9.27517e-7,0.048699506,0.0000056498043,0.00026626012,0.00072084944,0.4351963,0.00015538733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71930534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42361337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007477397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038007163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8634054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125479338","doi":"10.4324/9780429298004-4","title":"Women Lawyers and the Struggle for Change in Conflict and Transition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.12387662950211543,"score_gpt":0.36830485332688795,"score_spread":0.24442822382477253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125479338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014150584,0.0002353201,0.000023962137,0.19531275,0.000111725785,0.0005240963,0.000025774825,0.000016585951,0.8036083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19507284,0.0028142715,0.00031476494,0.039166868,0.0011509956,0.0005597274,0.000073433424,0.000033384164,0.7608137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995955,0.00002790138,0.00010317903,0.00011030819,0.00008377655,0.000079330974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995184,0.00029660654,0.00005600061,0.000039792765,0.000045683075,0.00004353645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038318167,0.000060286933,0.0001030061,0.000039977484,0.00017441428,0.00010671198,0.00004152056,0.000091325826,0.0005541568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007971608,0.000046029163,0.000014596012,0.000035469086,0.00022342456,0.00020872038,0.000005917111,0.0001590744,0.000004460384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026897342,0.0000022058528,0.0000018396909,0.000010229216,0.000007567813,1.0992761e-7,0.10336274,1.3713965e-8,4.0318287e-7,0.88853353,0.002359623,0.005694848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003830416,0.000014631423,0.0000236893,0.000008228596,0.000009138477,2.329658e-7,0.008433258,0.00001484626,2.1190074e-7,0.016009191,0.97504044,0.00006307243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022401395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034173464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035423804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012034948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60676277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125537851","doi":"","title":"The First Women Lawyers: \"Piecemeal Progress and Circumscribed Success\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Legal profession; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.024583178638408927,"score_gpt":0.349152384188517,"score_spread":0.3245692055501081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125537851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029485606,0.0006278382,0.00013184479,0.120486386,0.0013387019,0.0001774106,0.0000019436784,0.00004970434,0.8477006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963073,0.00022952037,0.00026983672,0.0012235575,0.0008522636,0.0000096943595,8.6955333e-7,0.000009256555,0.0010976644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985517,0.00012177103,0.00028533037,0.00011807342,0.0004316656,0.0004914582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867624,0.0004262952,0.00022179825,0.00011931189,0.0003031349,0.0002532135],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038976735,0.000084801504,0.00008608889,0.00004569402,0.0051251776,0.001373489,0.00029197082,0.00007644654,0.00028403976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033665414,0.00006325181,0.000030995325,0.00032104892,0.0005750379,0.00095438765,0.000028119708,0.0006057448,0.000027477457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028113964,0.000058523652,0.007635315,0.0000033012373,0.00002716952,0.000009233841,0.015356661,3.420996e-7,0.0000054649777,0.96175915,0.0020097427,0.013106955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026257624,0.00003309573,0.0062283766,0.000013003519,0.000009221881,0.000049529946,0.017193582,0.0000023898199,0.000016326456,0.032284535,0.9438,0.00010737992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015806017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2601517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96682173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018569807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032624166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125541173","doi":"","title":"Collaborative Policy-Making, Law Students, and Access to Justice: TheRewards of Destabilizing Institutional Patterns","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Humanities; Political science; Social justice; Sociology; Library science; Law; Criminology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.044282328353401054,"score_gpt":0.475541408780736,"score_spread":0.4312590804273349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125541173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8645763,0.00028266347,0.0021283908,0.06920582,0.00060991925,0.00031108691,0.000018501298,0.000016708947,0.06285062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972711,0.0008848161,0.00009475884,0.0007972134,0.0005311011,0.0000073992333,8.1984757e-7,0.0000060594143,0.00040673296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844617,0.00015041558,0.00020345018,0.00011733504,0.00041996175,0.0006626705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885195,0.00010248663,0.00034111322,0.00014467066,0.0004704358,0.00008931395],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002174874,0.00007480391,0.00010540092,0.00010781031,0.0027221832,0.0010737316,0.0006486566,0.00004990049,0.000054324704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017962807,0.000069599926,0.00002402374,0.00023317616,0.00026620977,0.0015901334,0.00010179966,0.00077209115,0.0000043676496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019286472,0.00006034625,0.03643488,0.000005278352,0.000045745757,5.2753336e-7,0.008018558,0.000007775581,0.00002919158,0.9518826,0.00006875183,0.0034270643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013089299,0.00035250632,0.2010817,0.00022304035,0.00020773671,0.00007098792,0.14892773,0.000007031967,0.00017184633,0.3877481,0.25936687,0.0005335118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009900249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07970066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5641345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007014918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012207935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125639536","doi":"","title":"Examining the Websites of Canada’s ‘Top Sex Crime Lawyers’: The Ethical Parameters of Online Commercial Expression by the Criminal Defence Bar","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Political science; Legal profession; Law; Representation (politics); Sexual assault; Criminal justice; Criminology; Public relations; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.08650779171728705,"score_gpt":0.3537954904260776,"score_spread":0.26728769870879054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125639536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77345437,0.00029579847,0.0000836229,0.17526004,0.00079175486,0.0003437589,0.00006683407,0.00002425311,0.049679548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881734,0.000012259022,0.0005102616,0.009643513,0.00019448089,0.00001382382,0.000011628525,0.000007739637,0.0014328479],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974072,0.0010678276,0.00034009747,0.00015436352,0.0007838875,0.0002466148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963895,0.0023918175,0.00028063398,0.00037910725,0.00042139413,0.00013754258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025996815,0.000102881,0.00014621083,0.000016581384,0.00092707836,0.0001132867,0.0007305915,0.000121951525,0.00028396363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047753877,0.000056339057,0.000036347312,0.00036005277,0.0008621283,0.0002626033,0.00008038841,0.0009915432,0.000010965789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009492943,0.00024050406,0.0068913656,0.000022714908,0.00005523634,0.0000017410391,0.07368469,0.000102080754,0.0026930398,0.17992371,0.7344805,0.0018094967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032187585,0.00008075542,0.008088717,0.000058263464,0.000081777485,0.0000034704829,0.17035863,0.000051660296,0.0055665593,0.001446869,0.81374323,0.00019820771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6355572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45448938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21471906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094056355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033554642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7130431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125781662","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4564","title":"Learning to Act Like a Lawyer: A Model Code of Professional Responsibility for Law Students","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Law; Legal education; Legal profession; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Ethical code; Practice of law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.09656630499813047,"score_gpt":0.4906529854882204,"score_spread":0.39408668049008994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125781662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8991441,0.00001520778,0.0023082357,0.03816298,0.0006155473,0.00180796,0.00004999982,0.000070616086,0.05782536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98242134,0.0000023972284,0.0057340926,0.004232248,0.00014373127,0.000046321904,0.000004369913,0.0000089923615,0.007406514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841815,0.00018123628,0.0003589218,0.0002347615,0.00057806075,0.00022884784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981432,0.0005951561,0.00021560871,0.00021221534,0.0006825016,0.00015131103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016713006,0.00008908038,0.00018462064,0.00013777669,0.00034014977,0.00012344624,0.0006170917,0.000084845204,0.0000996774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002966965,0.000090117006,0.00005248934,0.0005479278,0.00007655768,0.00073322596,0.00008766668,0.00021926039,0.000015553811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007440848,0.006100771,0.013938829,0.00067178207,0.00019350201,0.0000029704916,0.35385913,0.03511576,0.023973618,0.47220874,0.0707706,0.015723463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031006432,0.0019477125,0.12595151,0.0008045917,0.0007420301,0.0000012533532,0.041834645,0.004238205,0.0074928515,0.01578748,0.7968003,0.0012987636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006819082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006881993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7260297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075294614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090618775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36748648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125856224","doi":"","title":"`Neutrality`, `Choice`, and `Ownership` in the Construction, Use, and Adaptation of Judicial Decision Support Systems","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Political science; Politics; Value (mathematics); Judicial discretion; Judicial opinion; Law; Adaptation (eye); Law and economics; Sociology; Judicial review; Psychology","score_opus":0.06906622488836907,"score_gpt":0.26982664449267113,"score_spread":0.20076041960430208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125856224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98645085,0.00008569411,0.0011993235,0.0013521505,0.00022966054,0.00035651162,0.000050481118,0.000015947438,0.010259363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765515,0.0004761993,0.0015057835,0.000015545318,0.0000522419,1.7192667e-7,0.000009620843,0.0000030716062,0.0002821853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823517,0.00039204134,0.00033201405,0.0002675222,0.00059586455,0.00017739914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793214,0.0006849315,0.0004962715,0.00023262057,0.00056483934,0.00008917898],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088917924,0.00013177551,0.00023729657,0.00017696794,0.0018220264,0.000051396426,0.00041988233,0.00017137152,0.000037396007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021582817,0.00013049989,0.00007899961,0.00059011433,0.0041569583,0.0015443076,0.00005177188,0.00038210457,0.000001656814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029945382,0.00037577993,0.0962699,0.000097411066,0.00012552213,0.000098280725,0.076153114,0.0010496833,0.0012014621,0.82220924,0.00037291215,0.0017472585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010970198,0.0001873908,0.6104445,0.00014746671,0.00013041073,0.00021438152,0.3721817,0.00029977012,0.00005658177,0.0014183975,0.013580413,0.00024195372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038465932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074659763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8207908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010367632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016802071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125885760","doi":"10.37419/lr.v3.i3.4","title":"Addressing Access to Justice Through New Legal Service Providers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Legal service; Economic Justice; Bridging (networking); Service provider; Political science; Legal advice; Public relations; Legal research; Service (business); Business; Law; Public administration; Computer security","score_opus":0.32419587690783136,"score_gpt":0.5099527972806137,"score_spread":0.18575692037278235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125885760","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020385778,0.0000056465974,0.009074177,0.56796324,0.0006758463,0.0001573697,0.0000010639311,0.00009200595,0.41999206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66840416,0.00002124294,0.012588008,0.14939389,0.0018833912,0.00003138651,0.000002081001,0.000018108756,0.16765773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990877,0.00008609323,0.00014714933,0.00017422592,0.0002705359,0.00023429989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989636,0.00035635848,0.00006791974,0.00015279134,0.00030065692,0.00015868038],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030287035,0.00006438772,0.00006114889,0.000047259495,0.0005480653,0.0008882312,0.0003558453,0.000050890467,0.0042814063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001722542,0.000045436285,0.000016907521,0.0009457735,0.000039287228,0.005804079,0.000051476018,0.00009256678,0.00085956865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012643808,0.000035326622,0.00021002602,0.000009038282,0.000007874525,6.748934e-7,0.020565845,0.0000031305124,0.00039974338,0.35000372,0.6012964,0.027455552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117196236,0.000006047355,0.0004840512,0.000024496381,0.00001685994,5.1848804e-7,0.007506294,0.0000011035343,0.00031133514,0.0020702637,0.98936033,0.00010150576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060342476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027108517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66636556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096068194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020312117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125914650","doi":"10.29173/alr2592","title":"Charity Law Reform in Canada: Moving from Patchwork to Substantive Reform","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia; Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"Law reform; Politics; Law; Legislature; Political law; Political science; Modernization theory; Public law; Comparative law; Reform Act; Public administration; Sociology; Private law; Chinese law","score_opus":0.05728882419979675,"score_gpt":0.33818284341022037,"score_spread":0.2808940192104236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125914650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065053985,0.0032378028,0.000002224269,0.42462334,0.00027795925,0.00044891625,0.000015419397,0.000014139453,0.5648748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85008764,0.0038733406,0.00014655644,0.14527935,0.00018461366,0.000047588605,0.000031391955,0.00000967884,0.00033982386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986757,0.00015446193,0.0003767514,0.00024176926,0.00029435914,0.00025694806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990452,0.00026975846,0.00013360375,0.00020473894,0.00012221096,0.00022450388],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042569876,0.00010312046,0.00026015335,0.000010602281,0.000284804,0.00006631868,0.00030093823,0.000042663665,0.0011939417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007580988,0.00009150623,0.000037036487,0.0010345527,0.0000473085,0.00058428495,0.000043766424,0.00031386147,0.00022203107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004375463,0.000016199225,0.00068922975,0.0000757143,0.0000103892435,0.000002950736,0.007906593,1.441197e-7,0.0000026076643,0.98550737,0.0030722676,0.0027121503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048392136,0.0000063284533,0.0007914909,0.00049586396,0.000015043757,1.452782e-7,0.002046427,0.0000017285454,0.000013307303,0.00032709524,0.9961208,0.00013334912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99304855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017473388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019400637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125929373","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Finding commentary on cases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10845710168873976,"score_gpt":0.38751753341321177,"score_spread":0.27906043172447204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125929373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000118615235,0.0000767642,6.1553857e-7,0.45626363,0.0017469998,0.00014976146,0.0002355983,0.0001053413,0.54140943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016942095,0.00052405416,0.0008156085,0.6932789,0.005968772,0.000032674776,0.002139533,0.000051410498,0.28024694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839646,0.00030304535,0.00030670516,0.00027862718,0.000343552,0.00037161232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979501,0.0011347549,0.0001538387,0.0002133068,0.000064008724,0.00048403715],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031322462,0.00017921985,0.00018747327,0.0002512324,0.0013254926,0.00083092897,0.0004765871,0.0002688308,0.025016304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010045158,0.00018147788,0.000074259995,0.0006196141,0.00016271367,0.0010819053,0.000039349714,0.0008079553,0.000860499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013050242,0.000013192378,0.000054802254,0.000008274469,0.000019681042,0.000029112893,0.0027701708,3.2512642e-7,6.45991e-8,0.28780812,0.7085806,0.0007143176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000426723,0.00002667939,0.000011649683,0.000054675824,0.000020250021,0.000001301585,0.008295753,0.0000010324312,0.00000820914,0.00096181006,0.9903532,0.00022272608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9538862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8731721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2868463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031843004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050649396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125990778","doi":"","title":"Constructing Conflict: A Discursive Analysis of Family Law Conflict","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Problematization; Context (archaeology); Family law; Work (physics); Sociology; Political science; Conflict theories; Law and economics; Law; Public relations; Conflict resolution; Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.07049626092545204,"score_gpt":0.39255364843707385,"score_spread":0.32205738751162183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125990778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.378048,0.0022135223,0.0058358833,0.036985613,0.001225778,0.000272425,0.000023556686,0.00006323998,0.575332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965864,0.00042537038,0.00014292067,0.00047021822,0.00022223212,0.0000026212322,0.000008209611,0.0000064690603,0.0021355564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788857,0.00027938618,0.00034744086,0.00011853354,0.00044634438,0.0009197014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830306,0.00021598746,0.00044635648,0.00011750578,0.00076562597,0.00015149303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003614733,0.00008162015,0.00021731129,0.00025837214,0.00039928016,0.0001428218,0.00024174085,0.00007002598,0.000098275596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008612615,0.00007551648,0.00012623693,0.0015416786,0.00034920007,0.00060556,0.000014867034,0.0013058729,0.000014654239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013740156,0.000034882585,0.003272377,5.8348115e-7,0.0006070351,4.4383614e-7,0.015533172,0.000015816095,0.0000306793,0.9782097,0.00026247796,0.0020190955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060860347,0.00011590205,0.0004866118,0.000009209054,0.00087224843,0.000030060126,0.61825955,0.00007513795,0.000042264168,0.06991515,0.30937803,0.00020724267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014196908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028574057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90829456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008541923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010227882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126056042","doi":"","title":"Teaching Sexual Assault: The Education of Canadian Law Students","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Medical emergency; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine","score_opus":0.04057738844178617,"score_gpt":0.3881560732252747,"score_spread":0.3475786847834885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126056042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66275334,0.00003813806,9.0623196e-8,0.034518085,0.0018737302,0.00018715073,0.000017587601,0.000011563821,0.3006003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775971,0.000010023227,0.000060074944,0.0073099155,0.00044155674,0.00007914568,0.00000527397,0.000007517513,0.014489359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988569,0.00014924916,0.00017255315,0.00013246838,0.0002914954,0.00039730346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860424,0.00021613439,0.000092481896,0.00020573029,0.0004515975,0.00042982577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015565692,0.000081360646,0.000104897714,0.0003665783,0.0022951805,0.00015667865,0.0003841197,0.00007282413,0.00030256648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016258279,0.00006906172,0.000016322694,0.00065536035,0.0004078429,0.00033187514,0.000016875536,0.0005658695,0.00004698681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.81256e-7,0.000025211435,0.004371144,0.0000049978958,0.000052598156,5.043274e-7,0.20946904,2.519312e-7,0.000025473466,0.77265275,0.011796705,0.0016007375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002745262,0.000007010217,0.0017368698,0.0000031563775,0.0000071083427,4.230832e-7,0.3587348,1.3765155e-7,0.0000022853037,0.0023847197,0.63703763,0.00005842801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9817859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.770268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062671123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008606149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126058938","doi":"","title":"Mitigating the Protective-Services Orientation in Criminal Justice: An Opening Salvo at the University of Winnipeg","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Orientation (vector space); Criminology; Business; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04679002257318933,"score_gpt":0.320482430511192,"score_spread":0.2736924079380027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126058938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72141427,0.0000021038452,0.00020500744,0.0024463616,0.00022274702,0.00058539986,0.0000073017186,0.00003571906,0.27508107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981199,0.00094924925,0.00046694325,0.00018602038,0.0001222135,0.0000012368791,0.000010564898,0.0000065550767,0.00013734675],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985138,0.00069474103,0.000112890564,0.00016459273,0.0002580054,0.0002559697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989234,0.0003169048,0.00023136065,0.00020095157,0.0002728274,0.00005453799],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091376895,0.000087120265,0.00008739365,0.0010363415,0.0015569325,0.00006151231,0.00043929517,0.000068027206,0.0001379669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023257884,0.0000742417,0.00003808316,0.0054947124,0.00028365827,0.0022361586,0.00011233622,0.00029962356,0.000016258471],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013761525,0.00022433508,0.012796421,0.00007070908,0.000028724418,0.0000046007885,0.9163696,0.000044210374,0.00008926015,0.061640564,0.000079563186,0.008514407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024420297,0.000024960143,0.005372919,0.000023474455,0.00011667806,0.0000012243795,0.40736943,0.00007844384,0.00012367316,0.000003218381,0.5865514,0.00009033011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35949537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25039667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58647186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035731445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006635297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126410174","doi":"","title":"Ontario Civil Justice Reform in the Wake of COVID-19: Inspired or Institutionalized?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Democracy; Law; Political science; Civil procedure; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.09235470747411763,"score_gpt":0.36964443506326455,"score_spread":0.27728972758914694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126410174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030873552,0.00006228325,0.00017653988,0.27840075,0.0005212788,0.00040279218,0.000019754054,0.000052493626,0.68949056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323403,0.000028759163,0.0005602729,0.06305442,0.0003248083,0.000043240187,0.000021792768,0.000004926416,0.0036214392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985385,0.0002663258,0.00034490292,0.0001805538,0.0004737263,0.00019602322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988868,0.00036195177,0.00016779672,0.00019422598,0.0001509808,0.00023823661],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011230594,0.00008669564,0.0001332502,0.000045860652,0.0006288546,0.00014077274,0.00044964228,0.000089456014,0.0058038137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047834828,0.00006283051,0.000043975335,0.0010756924,0.00030444463,0.0008269745,0.00003353906,0.0004893042,0.00018954538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073741954,0.000106287895,0.0014987506,0.00003244673,0.000010034119,0.0000070464616,0.05586753,0.000032144606,0.000020697385,0.93152744,0.010695621,0.0001282855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003983023,0.000031595937,0.0018604004,0.000010418488,0.000024280453,0.0000020514562,0.017157009,0.0000052048736,0.0000096464155,0.0021507984,0.9782595,0.0000908109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5192162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9044399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96756387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006969387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007367147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127285983","doi":"10.46991/afa/2011.7.2.106","title":"Logic Puzzles as Mental Gymnastics for LSAT Preparation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Armenian Folia Anglistika","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Critical thinking; Logical reasoning; Mathematics education; Deductive reasoning; Psychology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.1291871375935426,"score_gpt":0.4219695145891717,"score_spread":0.2927823769956291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127285983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12313715,0.00008413902,0.0017041785,0.020119375,0.0032091665,0.0012395179,0.00006653027,0.00025786183,0.85018206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797737,0.000022276106,0.006039444,0.0014189343,0.0004222476,0.00009581003,0.000051649924,0.000011594279,0.012164354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991195,0.00007496332,0.00019363403,0.00018254985,0.0001852585,0.00024406568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992665,0.00012232228,0.00012890664,0.00014098348,0.00023377179,0.00010752449],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003870478,0.00008952117,0.00008451554,0.00006903066,0.0006659679,0.0001309022,0.00016968249,0.00007908058,0.0013602773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095003255,0.00009161425,0.000050848666,0.00026215316,0.00014708482,0.00058750814,0.000016594415,0.00009626788,0.00031598812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065760345,0.0001582369,0.0007046832,0.000005667338,0.000019978657,0.0000012851328,0.073614076,5.036722e-7,0.00010072951,0.88723725,0.036680922,0.0014108958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027045916,0.00012741484,0.0010044327,0.000006206728,0.000037442776,0.0000023000812,0.015882295,0.00002755916,0.0005046524,0.07387076,0.90809053,0.00017593603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019247232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010196398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8714096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097924465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042872553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127792742","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3581","title":"Understanding the Ongoing Dialogues on Indigenous Issues in Canadian Legal Education Through the Lens of Institutional Cultures (Case Studies at UQAM, UAlberta, and UMoncton)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Haute école Spécialisée de Suisse Occidentale; Canadian Armed Forces; University of Alberta; Fermilab; McGill University; Université de Moncton; Université du Québec à Montréal; Foundation for Research, Science and Technology","keywords":"Indigenous; Institution; Curriculum; Diversity (politics); Modalities; Legal education; Sociology; Political science; Law; Space (punctuation); Jurisprudence; Social science","score_opus":0.16371853865627015,"score_gpt":0.4077484529717164,"score_spread":0.24402991431544627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127792742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17320277,0.004199682,0.000019499419,0.2191491,0.0016095641,0.0002561182,0.000015741394,0.000009959601,0.6015376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994718,0.001440629,0.00011196775,0.0022564472,0.00040108664,0.000007525375,0.0000071179106,0.00000513154,0.0010520796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987201,0.00040069132,0.0002498745,0.00011817469,0.00027212716,0.00023900713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988643,0.0005237637,0.00016853349,0.000103479506,0.00026491025,0.000075004515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000854613,0.00008708279,0.00011392095,0.00005974076,0.004445899,0.0003302054,0.00012428834,0.000059026926,0.000085716216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092599174,0.000056124045,0.00003660687,0.0003429279,0.00050204166,0.000821612,0.000025499354,0.00047437934,0.0000047938947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054397296,0.00005098792,0.0012367525,0.000004865492,0.00003935506,0.000041497075,0.13307232,0.00007617115,0.000012442882,0.8639745,0.0012592586,0.00022637511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026750815,0.00004535649,0.0022183098,0.00015646454,0.00005934577,0.0014312909,0.39156815,0.000005034499,0.00012733415,0.101669714,0.50225633,0.00019516265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8981334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82151526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008552036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031061163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128395170","doi":"","title":"Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Tort; Legal profession; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.039612352586642766,"score_gpt":0.32091734972708147,"score_spread":0.2813049971404387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128395170","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05006333,0.0006877277,0.001276458,0.9252895,0.00027762103,0.00011350931,6.823209e-7,0.0000058257074,0.022285353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938963,0.0007729313,0.000013542578,0.00494781,0.00026345692,0.0000018068151,2.3594626e-7,0.0000021773208,0.00010175239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998939,0.00018447348,0.00014840589,0.00005641979,0.00016213745,0.0005095655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996206,0.00019100224,0.00006248396,0.000028856259,0.00004541526,0.00005164643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001588397,0.00003235603,0.00005071064,0.00001266632,0.00039176815,0.0001047199,0.00013429749,0.000014717578,0.00007446687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005512235,0.000023830939,0.000010909051,0.00030296473,0.00011855964,0.00021659242,0.0000086137425,0.0013612695,0.000006310078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017802142,0.000003642264,0.00025791733,2.7671624e-7,0.0000050950243,4.525455e-7,0.0055730725,0.000011156146,0.0000012542008,0.9820153,0.000093171686,0.012020841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082052575,0.000016872846,0.00008994069,0.0000023115285,0.0000065474856,0.000011626651,0.17462425,0.0001562107,0.000012460825,0.7329154,0.09201694,0.000065410495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95754814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99849117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94383293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006296014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02215007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98339343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130799523","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Making Federal Legislation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0795088310169272,"score_gpt":0.3736711354362158,"score_spread":0.2941623044192886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130799523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002290626,0.00013011461,0.000024783492,0.31741136,0.0023728292,0.00019985509,0.00005853682,0.00019868255,0.67960155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04648241,0.00030860057,0.0056580612,0.1657998,0.0095518725,0.000040443716,0.001514489,0.00007936525,0.770565],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983339,0.0002253173,0.00036873214,0.00029895312,0.00039212,0.00038098017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988954,0.00024509057,0.00022248206,0.00018707117,0.00015133295,0.0002985985],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003099192,0.00017059657,0.00018231462,0.00022345353,0.0015268918,0.0020664653,0.00042764368,0.00039567312,0.019281803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008234185,0.00018317165,0.000078856036,0.0007243503,0.00014023914,0.00247628,0.000035666526,0.00075054023,0.0007994826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.872597e-7,0.0000037250186,0.000072848416,0.000005916772,0.000011056713,0.0000029606406,0.0033511024,5.3989703e-7,1.2952516e-7,0.4284811,0.5670237,0.0010461267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003718469,0.000006613746,0.000042223743,0.000037305355,0.000013296786,7.2348763e-7,0.00346087,0.0000097756365,0.0000014816178,0.0053527877,0.99080634,0.00023141576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86689234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89802384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42378262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000252404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012051794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131305194","doi":"","title":"AI and Legal Ethics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Mandate; Legal profession; Political science; Legal research; Law; Professional conduct; Professional responsibility; Practice of law; Legal service; Engineering ethics; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.05170080300963048,"score_gpt":0.4005841194015922,"score_spread":0.34888331639196174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131305194","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011262968,0.00056454825,0.0037443205,0.9593014,0.00022433123,0.000047866877,4.8008866e-7,0.000028624554,0.024825435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717382,0.0025092324,0.00007718964,0.021882541,0.0008242471,0.0000010083627,6.3844584e-7,0.0000051729417,0.002961761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986926,0.00020055048,0.000114798444,0.00007842269,0.00023082926,0.00068282103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995068,0.000118797114,0.00007016862,0.000032587992,0.00015420762,0.000117455136],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022726736,0.00004345971,0.00005190777,0.000029708752,0.00081413734,0.00027693203,0.000113406815,0.00006928486,0.00014302284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016248956,0.00004179213,0.000021559921,0.00028662977,0.00008475764,0.00071471545,0.000010584158,0.0048010866,0.00004187576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062881545,0.000009487524,0.00024849692,9.73328e-7,0.000014368307,6.6978544e-7,0.009130768,7.928745e-7,0.000023747414,0.98252094,0.0016820629,0.006361397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012041211,0.000053806245,0.00009037622,0.0000019351417,0.000009980746,0.000035142824,0.021175995,0.00001499413,0.0000053306144,0.09767403,0.88075566,0.00006232134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011434116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044349968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96047527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018933487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013158091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131963496","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Session Laws Library: Browsing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0713582634306228,"score_gpt":0.37863052953250276,"score_spread":0.30727226610187997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131963496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000097297825,0.00029334016,0.000070137685,0.308855,0.0030301702,0.00019444978,0.000028111972,0.0005104649,0.68700856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019957896,0.0022602424,0.0074946554,0.04922537,0.009138609,0.00002878708,0.0007168252,0.000089330875,0.9290504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979904,0.0003492918,0.0004272654,0.00036637203,0.00055219216,0.00031445862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846315,0.00058399234,0.0003248389,0.0002473481,0.00014471078,0.00023593867],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036790257,0.00020088296,0.0002546564,0.00017304768,0.000880687,0.0013522744,0.00054656964,0.00044283684,0.025055885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018936843,0.00018729395,0.00010824293,0.0012066023,0.00016469925,0.0025758564,0.0001109616,0.0010089278,0.001285414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029398273,0.000025895171,0.000049782044,0.000026368569,0.000015338728,0.0000028337952,0.0054260027,2.481374e-7,0.000004046875,0.12287192,0.86661285,0.0049617933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000565777,0.000012118847,0.000015949094,0.00009669643,0.000026096293,6.11465e-7,0.005922221,0.000005317316,0.000031925287,0.0029872207,0.9905936,0.0002516274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004994073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005001294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25962964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076338925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004809235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132002735","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Finding judicial consideration of legislative provisions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislature; Political science","score_opus":0.09699600949113332,"score_gpt":0.38369219347066497,"score_spread":0.28669618397953167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132002735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016251486,0.00009357264,0.00003162125,0.1999163,0.001606015,0.000453641,0.00028619534,0.000088255496,0.7975081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36508435,0.00086351327,0.014851801,0.0828858,0.010082207,0.00013495499,0.0038183855,0.00015244527,0.52212656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980938,0.00032281165,0.0005756802,0.00028577793,0.0004253842,0.0002965863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786264,0.00084321416,0.00044856404,0.00017754303,0.0003611213,0.00030690627],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039164544,0.0001689793,0.00028975887,0.0003360136,0.0011019814,0.0005013069,0.000306301,0.00037894348,0.009904391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032945077,0.00017492895,0.00008897186,0.0008762883,0.0003763319,0.0018595553,0.000039589322,0.00067941577,0.00014619522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015665897,0.000009106385,0.000041959607,0.000009312133,0.000020735517,0.0000017754502,0.011280769,7.850069e-7,0.0000020696161,0.4688225,0.5194693,0.00034008428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006565833,0.000023381179,0.000029200455,0.00006825977,0.000035222438,4.5288874e-7,0.0072661554,0.000009219494,0.00004689071,0.009321681,0.98294646,0.00018745157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8581136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83248353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4634771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016117132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023248505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134487719","doi":"","title":"Building Self-Advocacy Skills of Legal Services Clients: Three Principles for Promoting an Innovation in Practice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Innovations Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Legal service; Action (physics); Work (physics); Practice of law; Business; Affect (linguistics); Service (business); Engineering ethics; Political science; Legal profession; Law; Sociology; Marketing; Engineering","score_opus":0.05195578566712274,"score_gpt":0.4309940339017474,"score_spread":0.3790382482346247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134487719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9137883,0.000040593168,0.009422041,0.060518425,0.0012796813,0.0005601925,0.00001764487,0.000079537254,0.0142935505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89348614,0.000024172989,0.10318189,0.0015045328,0.0014593637,0.00004935995,0.00006488955,0.000024015382,0.00020563258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707854,0.00039698477,0.0013427989,0.00023794864,0.00057781115,0.00036590546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901342,0.0005186381,0.0015575499,0.00014508855,0.007590145,0.00005439714],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005404742,0.00013186269,0.00021434091,0.0006576195,0.0018572331,0.0006931281,0.00030368357,0.00017127059,0.00007601241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070790523,0.00015343432,0.00005836191,0.007094644,0.00010572782,0.005158148,0.000045559493,0.00079171674,0.0000024979486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017997236,0.001041658,0.005374111,0.000037311704,0.000062666266,0.0000032664009,0.046842806,0.000029229612,0.001860796,0.935918,0.00016001257,0.008652152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016713197,0.000118213306,0.026490081,0.00017792823,0.000120578574,0.00005332301,0.10989896,0.00038369448,0.001475778,0.05953796,0.7995895,0.00048267242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075238344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022566442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003711279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005131073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134739799","doi":"","title":"Billing Without Bilking: Regulating Time-Based Legal Fees","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Distrust; Law; Obligation; Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Flexibility (engineering); Practice of law; Professional responsibility; Legal certainty; Legal profession; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.04381351952268743,"score_gpt":0.3285869188497427,"score_spread":0.2847733993270553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134739799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19638276,0.00013443333,0.0015316907,0.35315087,0.001000841,0.00057815877,0.000013101253,0.0008106536,0.4463975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749166,0.0000027934368,0.00614839,0.013852248,0.0012640681,0.000017513505,0.00001672189,0.000022255388,0.0037594477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838454,0.0002533928,0.00030184546,0.00029529375,0.00044702846,0.00031790737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987811,0.00029366635,0.0001904857,0.00019537093,0.00022980041,0.00030956758],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007685084,0.00012520164,0.00015755427,0.000052963238,0.0011957507,0.0006761614,0.0002839843,0.00010154292,0.0025599813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023142763,0.00012531492,0.00006810589,0.0008963054,0.00019368177,0.0011500432,0.00002845879,0.00046831838,0.0010740556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008301619,0.00018084598,0.018282427,0.000046720623,0.000058457135,0.000008539147,0.014368438,0.0010717432,0.0073746922,0.9253893,0.029394478,0.0037413293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028220893,0.000028632567,0.00035045325,0.000029612274,0.000017647788,5.407631e-7,0.0016341123,0.0012206734,0.0009677888,0.0006367796,0.9946154,0.00021618501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008579269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013809473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96522087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009335006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010577774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134897786","doi":"","title":"Trans Competent Lawyering","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal advice; Legal profession; Law; Criminalization; Family law; Racialization; Legal research; Practice of law; Professional responsibility; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017928810283497874,"score_gpt":0.33058371564178796,"score_spread":0.3126549053582901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134897786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56504625,0.0005723321,0.002323822,0.10939275,0.0017659644,0.00020814346,8.46704e-7,0.000069795424,0.3206201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981632,0.0009162497,0.000074891206,0.00043165896,0.00033416826,0.0000016026337,9.3834586e-7,0.000006335266,0.016602132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984722,0.00010741156,0.00013479716,0.00007551197,0.0002312505,0.0009788161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962974,0.00006617767,0.00007847105,0.0000691505,0.00009932712,0.000057163572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018937256,0.000047855974,0.00006210541,0.00006132241,0.0004264301,0.00014004779,0.00017257417,0.000037060694,0.00088933454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081678074,0.000045864857,0.00004764145,0.00025796052,0.000033022283,0.0005236611,0.000004739815,0.0015707389,0.0002132539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005568119,0.00003217926,0.0017978443,9.682722e-7,0.000026084963,2.179502e-7,0.004216834,0.000009105013,0.00031205028,0.97969747,0.00017852924,0.013723126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018891979,0.00005450699,0.0006678331,0.0000062981712,0.000010208085,0.000030534116,0.031222899,0.000008763368,0.000020557354,0.087697335,0.8799935,0.00009864357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001074712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005990011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89200014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005737676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005769124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135352614","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-67977-4_4","title":"Power on the Margins: Navigating the Program Director Role as an Asian, Queer, Immigrant Woman in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SpringerBriefs in family therapy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Queer; Identity (music); Gender studies; Power (physics); Sociology; Immigration; Institution; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Social science; History","score_opus":0.031351552343417785,"score_gpt":0.32626502969700943,"score_spread":0.29491347735359164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135352614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13705407,0.0024322271,3.915467e-7,0.060240906,0.0013343699,0.001500797,0.000022719989,0.000074160256,0.7973404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86197734,0.0037893788,0.00018500684,0.04374005,0.00089196954,0.0006654446,0.00006093337,0.00016640029,0.08852349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728215,0.00042030905,0.0004987335,0.0004712625,0.000819331,0.0005082292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814886,0.00057985826,0.00031602944,0.00066500524,0.00018555374,0.00010471163],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001582704,0.00032150553,0.0002992165,0.00008409621,0.00057940406,0.0004278112,0.00075109105,0.00021123995,0.0012785959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031978977,0.0002276726,0.00009416514,0.00042262807,0.00022372333,0.00024786897,0.00004272329,0.002206437,0.000029805917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007322571,0.0002449431,0.0012961661,0.000008129244,0.00010487016,0.00006904155,0.060092192,0.000010039255,0.0000780379,0.7864081,0.0034255472,0.14818966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017606355,0.0000519535,0.009170257,0.0002489666,0.0000039358197,9.941239e-7,0.02302738,0.000004337953,0.000019321884,0.003994971,0.9629994,0.00030243988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9527853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9680828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9595738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011337253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006964831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135356935","doi":"","title":"Using the Web to Facilitate Active Learning: A Transpacific Seminar on Globalization and Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Thursday; Class (philosophy); The Internet; Point (geometry); Media studies; Law; Sociology; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.061414572054821315,"score_gpt":0.35956477328779307,"score_spread":0.29815020123297176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135356935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56665117,0.000767268,0.019981403,0.11128132,0.0007826612,0.00063314167,0.0000062362346,0.00007406268,0.29982275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954362,0.0006408789,0.000077540244,0.0005037126,0.000079791076,0.0000028652403,7.392058e-7,0.000005671601,0.0032526257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998401,0.0005042727,0.00011540256,0.00010409962,0.00022225603,0.00065299944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995406,0.00012632315,0.000080616766,0.000054275515,0.00013069091,0.00006744493],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020711252,0.0000656938,0.000057867004,0.00005346911,0.0015066421,0.00019182268,0.00008499187,0.0000417149,0.000051455947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004906164,0.00005176757,0.000025605477,0.00048339742,0.000088287496,0.00036422635,0.0000027447586,0.0011578281,0.000013486651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019210915,0.000022177788,0.00012318407,5.6712355e-7,0.00001938295,1.9129037e-7,0.018782556,0.00023214602,0.0002429021,0.9782288,0.00008083617,0.0022480674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001908547,0.00013842869,0.00004533206,0.000010205513,0.000022536991,0.0000400901,0.11239902,0.000038862814,0.00007596525,0.06350518,0.8234283,0.00010524352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009011583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062589296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9147236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006088869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028512143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136266764","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3426794","title":"Students Fostering Legal Literacy: A Professor’s Perspective about the Canadian Journal of Law and Justice (Foreword)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Law; Literacy; Sociology; Political science; Legal research; Computer science","score_opus":0.02587451135063277,"score_gpt":0.39345818753305317,"score_spread":0.3675836761824204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136266764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7474016,0.003692174,0.00015158918,0.10342877,0.0032097306,0.0004310838,0.0000030556596,0.000010845304,0.14167115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99215937,0.0004141246,0.000043640415,0.0012641994,0.00070062134,0.0000022459876,3.2503664e-7,0.000009132248,0.0054063443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796045,0.00029312383,0.00026778592,0.000093251976,0.0004303033,0.00095509586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998401,0.00017399625,0.00034000032,0.00009345297,0.0008359842,0.00015559787],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042597135,0.00008319296,0.0001142131,0.00012711373,0.0016875566,0.0011877731,0.00042587562,0.000064194195,0.000115727365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050180726,0.00006155077,0.000050989973,0.00028346688,0.0001759941,0.0014634599,0.000028149392,0.0027291689,0.000017544202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018615896,0.000023283803,0.0026577117,0.0000031960244,0.0000781933,0.0000020629034,0.05729143,0.0000028439345,0.00000877898,0.93837,0.00012825201,0.0014156577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008212704,0.0002834754,0.005368394,0.00008721864,0.00017994957,0.0005986214,0.2859182,0.000009895011,0.0000068087247,0.26850104,0.4380122,0.00021290671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10779604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64939654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66986895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015287261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019968877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138280092","doi":"","title":"Transnational Law as Socio-Legal Theory: The Challenges for “Law in Context” in a Divided World","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Tribute; Comparative law; Law; Political science; Capitalism; Context (archaeology); Legal profession; Law and development; Sociology; Legal history; Empirical legal studies; Development studies; Geography","score_opus":0.028293761941167,"score_gpt":0.3476559591177631,"score_spread":0.3193621971765961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138280092","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05726061,0.0020550776,0.00018239436,0.7391401,0.00061913184,0.00068223214,0.0000033970775,0.0000201117,0.20003694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904208,0.00032865303,0.000016590546,0.003042928,0.0002306153,0.00004756798,0.000002564086,0.00001037837,0.0058999006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778426,0.00049936876,0.0002674823,0.00014070467,0.0003386282,0.0009695621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848133,0.0011080874,0.00013195866,0.00008900805,0.00015109683,0.00003850957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008118541,0.00008679625,0.00012211537,0.00012467438,0.000473794,0.00017345257,0.00031009957,0.00007323263,0.0002882746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025665463,0.000068500085,0.0000764862,0.00036677925,0.00015891409,0.0008353214,0.0000076046613,0.0019523589,0.0000240935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067147565,0.0000844243,0.00022054739,0.0000021563892,0.000028144228,2.62138e-7,0.012547536,0.0000065651057,0.000009311915,0.9835434,0.00003859914,0.003451929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005628864,0.000043663713,0.00029122565,0.000006027045,0.0000058497894,0.0000059286594,0.04505278,0.000006567966,0.0000039550177,0.67942125,0.27453157,0.00006829123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028089834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4842488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9331602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008449097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056219455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138893990","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Grade 11: Understanding Canadian Law: Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Everyday life; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10476552600024275,"score_gpt":0.3645932363131734,"score_spread":0.25982771031293067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138893990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000053074687,0.000048481652,0.00040268485,0.35098928,0.00801879,0.00019245765,0.000018727074,0.00013519781,0.64018905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08477038,0.00052804075,0.0016750036,0.03384658,0.040724125,0.00005700971,0.0010503571,0.000099274694,0.8372492],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791014,0.00033169155,0.0003829182,0.0003789274,0.0004799621,0.00051635347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984243,0.00034546177,0.00024244779,0.00033894516,0.00027389746,0.00037497358],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014982269,0.00019657111,0.0002221088,0.00047748274,0.0018804488,0.0009373778,0.00038288982,0.0004859809,0.008616399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001582768,0.00020503078,0.000081152335,0.000781817,0.00033724075,0.0008786401,0.000018086588,0.00073702185,0.00046032158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.9796422e-7,0.0000062034637,0.000014376578,0.0000071636923,0.0000103193715,3.74717e-7,0.0015150384,9.2694705e-7,3.0004267e-7,0.49802676,0.5003253,0.00009290759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005041839,0.000007912242,0.000005945614,0.00001972157,0.000033879915,0.0000017460121,0.011848487,0.0000036995368,0.0000031259374,0.026641553,0.96112823,0.00025524962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9611932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4713852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021241033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055230753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139249903","doi":"","title":"A Snapshot of the Law in the Streets: Reflections of a Former Parkdale Academic Director","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Experiential learning; Snapshot (computer storage); Sociology; Law; Reflection (computer programming); Context (archaeology); Political science; History","score_opus":0.0613625735406758,"score_gpt":0.3969125977249414,"score_spread":0.3355500241842656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139249903","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4301716,0.0011295471,0.00018489794,0.43353897,0.00042184314,0.00039202173,0.000007799306,0.000012255043,0.13414107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997171,0.00074206677,0.000020617268,0.0015966353,0.00021603444,0.000006584203,8.0357086e-7,0.0000036834472,0.00024261973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998491,0.00037361876,0.00027754746,0.0000656413,0.0003000051,0.00049220823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999293,0.00022037103,0.00026361228,0.000084546904,0.000108668326,0.000029756447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002012339,0.000048152975,0.000081974555,0.00003659324,0.00037324644,0.00002624226,0.00041103168,0.000055309014,0.00013544098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008031921,0.000029575425,0.000067652196,0.0010559789,0.00016306118,0.00033068625,0.00001319327,0.002282696,0.00000233191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001747564,0.000050157116,0.0024950637,0.0000026005077,0.000025440962,6.041626e-8,0.034551203,0.0000068787303,0.0007786575,0.96032333,0.0009206706,0.0008284503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050960085,0.00020365254,0.0038506247,0.00003595897,0.000068825735,0.00002507817,0.20509484,0.000014744282,0.000695687,0.22015214,0.5692063,0.0001425266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032232576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04085831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7401712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019247488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042293807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139419245","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.vi0.188989","title":"Sessional Contract Faculty, Unionization, and Academic Freedom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; McMaster University","funders":"Brock University","keywords":"Academic freedom; Collective bargaining; Freedom of association; Unit (ring theory); Union density; Political science; Freedom of contract; Law and economics; Labour economics; Law; Higher education; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Mathematics education; Human rights","score_opus":0.056340654337521355,"score_gpt":0.4084957059203853,"score_spread":0.352155051582864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139419245","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25917232,0.00996052,0.0002145255,0.6514101,0.016425991,0.0001798732,0.000034087057,0.000016974229,0.0625856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688569,0.0001025012,0.0008919262,0.0034502998,0.0014214723,0.000001972857,0.000036603014,0.0000061943415,0.025232181],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920434,0.00015242762,0.00024554794,0.0000760373,0.00017803976,0.00014362295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775136,0.00011159131,0.00023064752,0.00006037438,0.0014014534,0.0004445953],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039207106,0.00005150013,0.00007606473,0.00016712364,0.00047909384,0.00019924375,0.00010283553,0.00009666076,0.0031678812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008315902,0.000052639436,0.000022195476,0.0005158221,0.00011321237,0.0008720432,0.0000033009092,0.0003609098,0.000015159799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002964613,0.00005408735,0.11797425,0.0000061531105,0.000027995646,0.000006807911,0.01223037,0.000014970887,0.00015434485,0.38346243,0.47987443,0.0061911806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008745867,0.0000047444983,0.13950777,0.000026931168,0.000015940852,0.000029169592,0.002781463,7.8660065e-7,0.00002101489,0.0033663288,0.8541032,0.00005515829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013188548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017416216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70968455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021848886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02691523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99774337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141387742","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500001712","title":"Free Legal Advice on the Internet","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Legal advice; Political science; German; Law; Portuguese; Romanian; Lithuanian; Public relations; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.01893122793269297,"score_gpt":0.33485186602595596,"score_spread":0.315920638093263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141387742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042169083,0.000015871341,0.0017904398,0.3105162,0.004393738,0.000116044444,0.00001964163,0.000036376146,0.6409426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876476,0.000012666445,0.00035977428,0.006189715,0.0015400149,0.0000039205243,0.00001750173,0.0000037751354,0.0042250133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813884,0.00011681069,0.0005999545,0.000040399333,0.0009847129,0.00011929339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997237,0.00034085568,0.0007359543,0.0001102078,0.0015335261,0.00004241142],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001249157,0.000073213916,0.000072946015,0.00027051606,0.00017975956,0.0010768754,0.00078832806,0.00005288089,0.00075286266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016214105,0.00005333786,0.00008372938,0.00025069824,0.00009179818,0.007009714,0.00003265304,0.00044452475,0.00016765468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047245725,0.000046876965,0.00012140377,7.218507e-7,0.000024272274,0.0000024948563,0.0020006623,0.00011333786,0.000009275692,0.71605885,0.2789909,0.0025839538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002684587,0.00003584434,0.0015534314,0.000022566253,0.0000074540353,0.000030183997,0.002117458,0.000122669,0.00016702434,0.0036934824,0.9919198,0.00006160938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007854471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007454345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94547856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024377671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058326375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141728951","doi":"","title":"New developments at the University of Ottawa Community Legal Clinic.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Legal service; Family medicine; Library science; Medicine; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10146995134018985,"score_gpt":0.33919369667282817,"score_spread":0.23772374533263832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141728951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15049556,0.000019007899,0.00006395974,0.04991889,0.000372996,0.00020831951,0.0000018172268,0.000022671838,0.7988968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8197193,0.0000376958,0.00017349246,0.00057188416,0.000048895887,0.0000032358219,0.0000035292503,0.0000016589041,0.1794403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992281,0.00035369158,0.00009330497,0.000044755638,0.00014907839,0.00013102488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927473,0.00033810452,0.00009859768,0.00013083869,0.00008776906,0.00006995164],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014486897,0.000028911847,0.0000444338,0.00002294138,0.0010574238,0.000030524985,0.00026849797,0.00003524588,0.0016614166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006764641,0.000025773386,0.000020842866,0.00041343193,0.00013630008,0.00031475822,0.000048806105,0.00021571823,0.00011752316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034023986,0.00014809793,0.11641396,0.0000027664407,0.000041965097,0.0000012353586,0.034288872,0.0000010515106,0.000001760194,0.037225228,0.54685,0.26499104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069606984,9.669614e-7,0.3490094,4.572929e-7,0.000004030139,2.941621e-7,0.0047767325,6.066018e-8,0.0000048821726,0.00012634012,0.64598626,0.000020938336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041676003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052440714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6692237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011265364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047428702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143406518","doi":"","title":"Book Reviews: International Perspectives on the Regulation of Lawyers and Legal Services by Andrew Boon, Ed","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Legal profession; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Legal service","score_opus":0.012571241296601803,"score_gpt":0.3322306354420002,"score_spread":0.3196593941453984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143406518","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114787236,0.052221656,0.00061220967,0.6313639,0.0012852598,0.00049489416,0.000009317945,0.00004456515,0.19918096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436863,0.032959204,0.000036135207,0.003202989,0.0008476365,0.0000053655112,0.0000034421344,0.0000065629024,0.01925238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988503,0.00023435862,0.0001966913,0.000102283586,0.00025744396,0.00035894514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991984,0.000111222784,0.00028016124,0.0000781525,0.0002989032,0.00003317978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024084726,0.000060981165,0.00007615344,0.000058643665,0.00057252904,0.00015306397,0.00019814505,0.00003855256,0.0007461886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029380983,0.000043866832,0.00003286854,0.00018274366,0.00022473448,0.00077953446,0.000010980487,0.0006432199,0.00002209551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030935393,0.000046544403,0.00013576173,0.0000020542666,0.000048544676,3.3907337e-8,0.010827673,1.9352309e-7,0.00041322495,0.9483005,0.03615252,0.004042024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001243758,0.000090575835,0.00027373814,0.000024280065,0.00001332084,0.000010398762,0.04051942,0.000009821034,0.00007328289,0.012917346,0.94588923,0.000054204436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081594236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016282031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93538314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002848686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010760137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81702423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145864293","doi":"10.5860/dttp.v49i1.7536","title":"RIGHTS! Civil and Human Rights Law Portal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DttP Documents to the People","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Civil society; International human rights law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.01893893334414727,"score_gpt":0.36397865437969434,"score_spread":0.3450397210355471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145864293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19803172,0.00003111124,0.00003147547,0.07336974,0.00059967366,0.0001963136,0.000008890166,0.000045689503,0.7276854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954366,0.0000029787957,0.00010324095,0.002883092,0.0002738727,0.000024816241,0.000021941281,0.0000045350034,0.042319514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904037,0.00015380656,0.00014766555,0.00017759317,0.0002802435,0.00020032923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936354,0.00010659943,0.000058316415,0.00022005303,0.00013605875,0.00011542708],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039625593,0.000070220114,0.000081598715,0.00003082422,0.0023551572,0.000479967,0.00013931513,0.000039210336,0.005363028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007386188,0.000052514704,0.000026192325,0.00046640952,0.00007884973,0.00055386755,0.00005833813,0.00015178208,0.00034072532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014057991,0.000064375265,0.00037156895,0.0000013497059,0.000016060398,0.0000037456057,0.020141935,0.0000010000825,0.0000344365,0.9269073,0.052406393,0.000050451727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009468553,0.000008705618,0.0017697756,0.0000042785487,0.000014489461,0.000004017844,0.0016030485,6.1294656e-7,0.00012480209,0.025682608,0.9706103,0.00008264045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07077621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5482255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91820395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035406014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012806103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148220753","doi":"","title":"The Essence of Snobbery Is a Problem of Belonging: When Public Interest Litigation Is Used as a Cover for Controversy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Public interest; Disadvantaged; Political science; Cover (algebra); Subject (documents); Diversity (politics); Law; Statement (logic); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.04071740326763004,"score_gpt":0.36359249890910533,"score_spread":0.3228750956414753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148220753","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18817192,0.00056804414,0.03921719,0.7466085,0.0008264231,0.0010163741,0.000022443051,0.000031970627,0.023537174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932556,0.0002553147,0.00019417553,0.0007405488,0.00030915625,0.000013384272,0.0000017208572,0.0000074182767,0.0052226568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983938,0.00013716616,0.00034303078,0.00010303574,0.00030024932,0.00072274223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997541,0.0005731703,0.0005745474,0.000119035976,0.001138754,0.00005348992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032472997,0.00006680701,0.00010843417,0.000085690706,0.0008010647,0.0001905305,0.0003055718,0.000060087725,0.00024380824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013934495,0.00005224008,0.000079153986,0.00036331418,0.0003389165,0.00082554366,0.000014967852,0.0005681913,0.000015269183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041739084,0.000049608752,0.0006819703,0.0000043755103,0.00008712549,2.2188454e-8,0.0137806805,8.7512525e-8,0.00049308315,0.9759681,0.0051949634,0.0036982063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003934797,0.00026405422,0.00006357061,0.00002313547,0.000025698548,0.0000067213905,0.01910134,0.000026933467,0.0010367429,0.65720963,0.32178333,0.000065343316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010182344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062779165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8050837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035582384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009729339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148743119","doi":"","title":"Racism in Justice: The Report of the Commission on Systemic Racism in the Ontario Criminal Justice System","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Commission; Criminology; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05167353823640052,"score_gpt":0.30420715435651646,"score_spread":0.25253361612011593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148743119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077966094,0.00035340013,0.000020547166,0.0074419035,0.0025077579,0.0010546825,0.0000060153393,0.000024768644,0.9106248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68324685,0.00023158269,0.000014154208,0.00014469698,0.0002568606,0.000001915481,0.000007427056,0.000010864774,0.31608567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969076,0.0006595701,0.0007048157,0.0003434514,0.0011505369,0.00023405616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963244,0.00086856337,0.0017829004,0.0006857445,0.00027287638,0.00006550038],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026347288,0.00021591727,0.00035776515,0.00020932635,0.0011310602,0.000041658834,0.0014745083,0.0006120122,0.00009690075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002770875,0.00015658642,0.00018724153,0.00030977064,0.00048519357,0.00033140258,0.0001148389,0.0027672541,0.000016152004],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034900676,0.00023116914,0.0039810785,0.0014762925,0.00013389233,0.00071402534,0.4508582,0.00027391358,0.00021084894,0.4939823,0.04688896,0.0009003204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059269124,0.000057913876,0.013017756,0.00382692,0.0020832045,0.0006180045,0.30827138,0.000042200158,0.000016977494,0.0005845063,0.6705187,0.000369789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03863029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0102395015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6236297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001595263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017462989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148978637","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3661685","title":"Linking with Law: Reaching Out to Include Law as a Human Service","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06021864175101786,"score_gpt":0.3989549730933505,"score_spread":0.3387363313423326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148978637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1937152,0.0001945195,0.0012770261,0.1589391,0.0004958516,0.00022279682,7.1841697e-7,0.000100597834,0.6450542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831729,0.000025442845,0.0004056997,0.01066564,0.0009224446,0.0000063882258,0.000003509116,0.000016006337,0.0047819912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997775,0.00024819438,0.00020165608,0.00014046101,0.00050915073,0.001125493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989167,0.00006829505,0.00016267404,0.00012860323,0.00048944744,0.00023432367],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044740583,0.00009285689,0.00010057178,0.00006630142,0.0016731558,0.0004862407,0.00033561292,0.00006428941,0.00004068913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019298118,0.000081900194,0.000025057747,0.0004548982,0.00005468825,0.0010342017,0.000034269484,0.0022688252,0.00020117838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019143381,0.000041710082,0.00019262177,0.000001071533,0.000028222217,0.0000012382504,0.049186286,0.000016874608,0.000090969144,0.9493927,0.00021274836,0.00081645814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028925954,0.00017928837,0.00001592411,0.000028102957,0.000021163409,0.00006332319,0.051897593,0.0000018466924,0.00002913873,0.3393503,0.6079805,0.00014358269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05586327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57090604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7894577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013998519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008353119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150700372","doi":"","title":"The Barrie guide to the law of evidence 2020","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05809992899119372,"score_gpt":0.34044186105565166,"score_spread":0.28234193206445796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150700372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031154534,0.0009614596,0.0013495402,0.28738695,0.0019128977,0.00085525645,0.000017311859,0.00015889446,0.67620313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.942319,0.00028624816,0.0012320536,0.0038122258,0.00071282417,0.0000033785561,0.0000016051483,0.000014610681,0.05161806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970999,0.0012393052,0.00034617342,0.0003100675,0.0006654145,0.0003391571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996534,0.0016965672,0.0002948545,0.00049690885,0.000628573,0.00034909428],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010826538,0.00013848298,0.00018768884,0.00010310564,0.0025053504,0.00025215096,0.0012137648,0.000079785874,0.00012288321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003310861,0.00009382549,0.00014922635,0.002566228,0.00067361805,0.00082268316,0.00015414506,0.00039421668,0.00007167032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012855676,0.000026814136,0.0013475568,0.000009765564,0.000060542672,0.000020410203,0.0055866647,0.000011405579,0.0027696693,0.946907,0.042749263,0.0003823433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012665926,0.00012409242,0.0002320763,0.000015423546,0.00007250066,0.0000020092655,0.04189907,0.0000064461037,0.0033423204,0.00016174353,0.9538976,0.00012004756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018981842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036292414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9467453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005523351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008952224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151452683","doi":"","title":"The Minister’s Office Lawyer: A Challenge to the Role of the Attorney General?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Officer; Politics; Competence (human resources); Power of attorney; Professional conduct; Government (linguistics); Prime minister; Management; Health care","score_opus":0.023490984147953774,"score_gpt":0.3120317577481743,"score_spread":0.28854077360022057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151452683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13331695,0.0004816013,0.0000024284543,0.25876382,0.0017286701,0.0006112203,0.000012022077,0.000031419142,0.6050519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94821733,0.000059185146,0.00008353083,0.00738313,0.00061199465,0.000051148723,0.0000016144724,0.0000104187575,0.04358167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984874,0.00040948694,0.00023266043,0.00017156947,0.00044329235,0.00025560756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983819,0.00048437284,0.00016695079,0.0006502179,0.00022261312,0.000093916955],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012567345,0.000087579756,0.00009407742,0.000016090846,0.0011882985,0.00027262158,0.00087947433,0.00006757298,0.00073388533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006189591,0.000046146313,0.0000789707,0.00049364567,0.00019462005,0.0002948057,0.00009949602,0.00033902953,0.0012963711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013746086,0.000049460017,0.0010675535,0.0000027518481,0.000017160113,7.027796e-8,0.0075069303,0.00001130409,0.0002186506,0.9674757,0.02194677,0.0016898704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007628723,0.000019995054,0.0023385359,0.000009398424,0.000009337572,4.4179131e-7,0.0072090714,0.000007638218,0.00017730404,0.0015514658,0.9885282,0.00007233585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010199112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03195552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9665814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006254368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005142832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151486463","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: News, Blogs & Keeping up to Date","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Media studies; Internet privacy; Advertising; Computer science; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.07876365324839102,"score_gpt":0.3736533940056668,"score_spread":0.29488974075727575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151486463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000063807147,0.000107807035,0.000012926604,0.4007263,0.0035263754,0.00026434113,0.00009717932,0.00017505158,0.59508365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027568608,0.00060800876,0.0036652458,0.40134743,0.004603921,0.00004483379,0.0008602719,0.00005914303,0.58605427],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979736,0.00021841792,0.00044700148,0.00043752237,0.0003884239,0.0005350088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803203,0.00030418395,0.00016769081,0.00034397695,0.00017588276,0.000976249],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000348372,0.0002104232,0.0002656912,0.0003195073,0.0010394814,0.0014521256,0.00087269,0.00035275504,0.018011421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016294357,0.00022590211,0.00007927302,0.0013962444,0.0001222129,0.0015977843,0.00009697647,0.0007638863,0.002836981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011197416,0.0000034635066,0.000032604385,0.000008661084,0.000017123206,0.000004213788,0.007947863,4.4768433e-7,4.775557e-7,0.3265504,0.6639093,0.0015243047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003956451,0.000011111443,0.000010379271,0.00004260773,0.000022210608,6.284556e-7,0.0101255225,0.0000017196171,0.000007803052,0.0015425027,0.9878949,0.0003010382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9645845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92505306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32500792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001516337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013279987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151706072","doi":"","title":"Effecting a Culture Shift -- An Empirical Review of Ontario's Summary Judgment Reforms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Aside; Supreme court; Summary judgment; Political science; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Law","score_opus":0.04074323343415881,"score_gpt":0.36006462844406517,"score_spread":0.31932139500990636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151706072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10840872,0.0017094922,0.00023318987,0.08108213,0.00031685832,0.00040111598,0.000008339269,0.000057592715,0.8077826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95232666,0.0037749698,0.0024052374,0.0006008607,0.000079236735,5.932295e-7,0.000008611097,0.0000054092116,0.040798433],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992779,0.00012961448,0.000089963425,0.00012723323,0.0002483754,0.00012691227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992773,0.00007180792,0.0002078235,0.00017670954,0.00017424792,0.000092099064],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066296,0.000058752004,0.0001508734,0.00001716801,0.0002545426,0.000008390319,0.00021642062,0.000068584784,0.020284582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015967441,0.000047183523,0.00006565368,0.000103925275,0.00012898857,0.0013707369,0.000038708582,0.00009349708,0.000012154608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001262551,0.00054662366,0.032212242,0.0006402601,0.00011698304,0.000005123129,0.73908883,1.8833217e-7,0.0005209168,0.026744442,0.04692357,0.15307456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033052557,0.00015741242,0.18507743,0.0011929782,0.000060689585,5.174135e-7,0.027884753,4.2817257e-7,0.000027614735,0.000097451266,0.7850312,0.00013901324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81558156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8679239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8439179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094785955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086581544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152901294","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3481494","title":"Law and Humanities: A Field Without a Canon","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Field (mathematics); Canon; Digital humanities; Political science; Law; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.017604125924256524,"score_gpt":0.3329253766722241,"score_spread":0.3153212507479676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152901294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21414618,0.00071568455,0.00020090972,0.03796114,0.00057285023,0.00014640298,5.1687095e-7,0.000030190713,0.74622613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648087,0.0006630547,0.00003303261,0.003611716,0.0002939657,0.0000023051862,4.877965e-7,0.0000049125383,0.030581847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998913,0.000086820175,0.000102572434,0.00007286856,0.00015789672,0.0006668605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996229,0.000112177986,0.00007813824,0.000059042686,0.00008972895,0.00003800719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012082452,0.00004550901,0.00006016508,0.000045700897,0.0005178969,0.00021407387,0.000098737095,0.00004338904,0.00053286634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013839472,0.00004244063,0.000019846193,0.000118334865,0.000052088224,0.0005498054,0.000008309945,0.0012062656,0.0000625015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007084458,0.000012239498,0.0019537099,0.000001162244,0.000016055854,1.3870928e-7,0.005328846,1.7434733e-7,0.000023011351,0.9904239,0.0002997797,0.0019338592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000194658,0.0001105227,0.00008995718,0.000007755894,0.0000099951085,0.000034820656,0.031514287,0.0000024225717,0.00001182625,0.22340095,0.7445426,0.000080232225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009929296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07856932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76702297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027725336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042151264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152976178","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1253","title":"Beyond Reconciliation: Decolonizing Clinical Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Decolonization; Colonialism; Legal education; Political science; Indigenous; Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Hegemony; Politics","score_opus":0.12303640261836599,"score_gpt":0.5184570339269928,"score_spread":0.3954206313086268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152976178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.162401,0.00005004197,0.0000124125845,0.3418004,0.0022296195,0.000058199315,0.0000017508148,0.000006138322,0.49344042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755048,0.00014891858,0.00046392248,0.008676815,0.012194999,0.0000012360871,7.691352e-7,0.0000041786598,0.0030043582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990375,0.00019398704,0.00038456862,0.000062381056,0.00020128842,0.000120242985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829245,0.00013614913,0.00084738596,0.0000787702,0.00054407533,0.000101197606],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018592565,0.000046745186,0.00013436402,0.00006258279,0.0026920747,0.0007249761,0.000192422,0.00010924465,0.000062451865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021100014,0.000045697452,0.0000757254,0.00006523792,0.0003843118,0.0017169189,0.000018936416,0.0003330392,0.000008339992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009443201,0.000069767055,0.0017657147,0.0000024623648,0.000015070481,5.870601e-7,0.0103579005,2.246942e-8,0.000003992775,0.94398934,0.010960878,0.03282484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020329648,0.00002967506,0.02496784,0.0000066439065,0.000019057861,0.000005838111,0.0035576473,4.1322545e-7,0.000003151298,0.031120477,0.94003075,0.000055209057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01195741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032966752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9290699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010719067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004510112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154621185","doi":"","title":"RECONCILIATION AND ETHICAL LAWYERING: SOME THOUGHTS ON CULTURAL COMPETENCE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Indigenous; Conversation; Legal education; Accountability; Political science; Commission; Public relations; Legal ethics; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02650857606716971,"score_gpt":0.36201536660452693,"score_spread":0.3355067905373572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154621185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8442742,0.00028387815,0.00008418495,0.1325136,0.0011912056,0.00013935466,6.6999297e-7,0.000036611902,0.021476297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98926204,0.0016517788,0.00007518728,0.0017543078,0.001236383,0.000002070315,0.000001601163,0.000004740815,0.006011893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857396,0.00021000464,0.0001495734,0.000117162024,0.0002781386,0.0006711678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994034,0.00019255355,0.00012244208,0.00006556341,0.00014986884,0.00006617707],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022520092,0.00006192709,0.00007558885,0.000051326788,0.0005216902,0.00020978559,0.00012026497,0.000115338604,0.00006529401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004836741,0.000052199757,0.000027799657,0.00018441015,0.00006988958,0.00061638374,0.000008851939,0.0030830994,0.00013991703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013212184,0.000014305211,0.000972797,0.0000012042956,0.000012008402,1.7257437e-7,0.0033840784,0.0000045532397,0.00017640706,0.99139595,0.0002602636,0.0037650275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004993847,0.00030556857,0.0036629953,0.000031692274,0.000017473936,0.00006868421,0.034528166,0.00006613253,0.000098581135,0.5040747,0.45638967,0.00025692588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033845336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017577102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48732126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052599877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028000635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155054010","doi":"","title":"Rule 2.1 of Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure: Responding to Vexatious Litigation While Advancing Access to Justice?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; American rule; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Law; Resolution (logic); Procedural justice; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; History; Politics","score_opus":0.027454988737322376,"score_gpt":0.36844155630981,"score_spread":0.34098656757248763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155054010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93375057,0.00006863622,0.004188047,0.018147549,0.0006073609,0.00027701556,0.0000033572921,0.000019050533,0.042938415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909042,0.00005313526,0.0010483115,0.00054778275,0.0005830238,0.000009573629,0.0000026140294,0.000010613914,0.0068407324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804926,0.00012717256,0.0003949225,0.00014459138,0.0004226898,0.00086134096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982876,0.0001525326,0.0003931916,0.000120067634,0.0009152402,0.00013132114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003086901,0.000081509796,0.00013680273,0.00050906395,0.00057482236,0.000144161,0.0003674447,0.000057776706,0.00045753727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002531289,0.000083531464,0.000039569226,0.0013167699,0.0000711388,0.0010976805,0.00003593114,0.0007079415,0.000037455746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022253537,0.00018251933,0.0085366415,0.000034107445,0.00007880881,3.9776685e-7,0.13434038,0.000119910575,0.0074758166,0.8339293,0.0053189243,0.0097606545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000826457,0.0014020241,0.01783011,0.00039916567,0.00023793273,0.00004908739,0.07413759,0.000020724603,0.0107846875,0.3814717,0.5122394,0.0006011096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015200831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47208232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5069205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020136358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023115488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155570504","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3372627","title":"Legal Education – Some Recent Developments Globally and in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal education; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.01640377406888195,"score_gpt":0.3379821807311893,"score_spread":0.32157840666230736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155570504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7214545,0.0010489014,0.000020578165,0.1955332,0.002140935,0.0001429942,0.0000012227011,0.0000060988004,0.07965157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885782,0.006201314,0.00008006984,0.000984617,0.0002564007,0.000003936459,0.0000016961358,0.0000036374124,0.0038901172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867445,0.00007861522,0.00015890908,0.00008935539,0.0002576364,0.00074102794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946564,0.000025555535,0.00019485783,0.000087845314,0.00014585709,0.00008022231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014586623,0.000052153955,0.000058860758,0.00005098837,0.0011480032,0.00044140738,0.0002680306,0.000028799139,0.00005035048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007256026,0.000053406686,0.000007750646,0.000098904005,0.00004206232,0.0012860799,0.000019364983,0.000902855,0.0000056752588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011061774,0.000042938325,0.05124603,0.0000010177771,0.000016428266,9.564268e-7,0.0007051795,6.972343e-7,0.000006976874,0.78306574,0.0019609793,0.16294202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001977897,0.000008946363,0.09056679,0.000012054286,0.0000049643704,0.000030469026,0.017026538,0.0000012000563,0.0000047485905,0.0786974,0.81334454,0.000104579405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.957003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99801224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81138355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048177126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19286095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155743310","doi":"","title":"Student Suicide On-Campus: Tort Liability of Canadian Universities and Determining a Duty of Care","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Duty; Duty of care; Jurisprudence; Lagging; Liability; Political science; Law; Public relations; Medicine","score_opus":0.04501254650942251,"score_gpt":0.39868388322863135,"score_spread":0.35367133671920886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155743310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20236726,0.06438998,0.0000010786806,0.0054784343,0.00041091224,0.00042929847,0.00008878992,0.000009911828,0.72682434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729432,0.026268367,0.00004004421,0.0006246701,0.000025710306,0.0000035208268,0.000017733759,0.0000026682342,0.0000740849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991984,0.0001011465,0.00028154044,0.00011289746,0.00019532107,0.000110714296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990857,0.00008399803,0.00019590676,0.00014122369,0.0003943322,0.00009880243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048241677,0.00006317283,0.0002313458,0.000043747903,0.00018193925,0.000015777028,0.000082471495,0.000030377834,0.00006848076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007307619,0.00005357107,0.000044809505,0.00029827206,0.00030829612,0.00021095978,0.000028721752,0.00010365772,5.0234087e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024268527,0.00004127467,0.0023445871,0.0026085158,0.000013738492,5.2953754e-7,0.008885694,5.16851e-8,0.0000024141596,0.97708374,0.00005731626,0.008959734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009411598,0.000041595777,0.0028934274,0.0026599248,0.000047860507,7.9835456e-7,0.021000799,1.6531318e-7,0.000099351426,0.00014835829,0.97294533,0.000068250956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17931949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40139803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9769354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013133616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010178854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8261455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156382991","doi":"","title":"Sense of Access to Justice As a Framework for Civil Procedure Justice Reform: An Empirical Assessment of Judicial Settlement Conferences in Quebec (Canada)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Economic Justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Civil procedure; Law; Law reform; Dispute resolution; Public administration; Citizen journalism; Order (exchange); Alternative dispute resolution; Procedural justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.061158783451529565,"score_gpt":0.4558131326623717,"score_spread":0.39465434921084214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156382991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.636214,0.0000898934,0.04078349,0.3089683,0.0011680111,0.0009079754,0.00005884286,0.000016123326,0.011793371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99632406,0.00022695388,0.00092617224,0.0014684726,0.00044556693,0.000028647084,0.000003734292,0.00000868061,0.00056771917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975067,0.00024720788,0.00050521316,0.00017832476,0.0006441609,0.00091843266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980969,0.0004814935,0.00045029848,0.00012432667,0.0007040083,0.00014299448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027461804,0.00010380348,0.0002043075,0.00015684306,0.00031285814,0.000096881755,0.0003129006,0.00010016101,0.00017284966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026186362,0.00007758084,0.000039327337,0.0005963525,0.000091034824,0.00076116767,0.00002827741,0.0008050831,9.897337e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015237284,0.00025212285,0.0043789265,0.000041748226,0.000054644708,0.0000011481426,0.0038255285,0.000015788639,0.00013245511,0.98306316,0.0014424281,0.0066397036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017456227,0.0014671932,0.051338725,0.00051222334,0.0005254743,0.00003351916,0.3120032,0.000069181435,0.00040709475,0.5540572,0.077223584,0.000617004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53435135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99054253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45619118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002561351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.088036224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91713375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157155005","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v28i1.1130","title":"Trauma-Informed Lawyering In The Student Legal Clinic Setting: Increasing Competence In Trauma Informed Practice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Legal education; Informed consent; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Law; Political science; Alternative medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09575948118721386,"score_gpt":0.5498125521665888,"score_spread":0.45405307097937486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157155005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.662054,0.00013013017,0.000045356457,0.17598319,0.0070135323,0.0002078589,0.0000027359495,0.000010901035,0.15455228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794496,0.0004152862,0.0062967944,0.010815133,0.002282884,0.000016146123,0.000020407957,0.000010042898,0.00069368136],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934971,0.0018473768,0.0026517406,0.00021680097,0.0015044909,0.00028250253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838682,0.011474017,0.0018294915,0.0002112121,0.0024587472,0.00015834253],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01228974,0.00014258506,0.00032233907,0.000359593,0.00019884191,0.0009736626,0.00096907653,0.00016573218,0.00034572187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06467817,0.00012454591,0.00020503248,0.00090550346,0.00019452677,0.0048548486,0.00005513681,0.0018031801,0.000041355404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001504626,0.010889313,0.17005189,0.00004300359,0.0003469132,0.0003468092,0.121888176,0.00025021835,0.000053373948,0.26379547,0.012872136,0.41795808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082228007,0.000068264555,0.2304051,0.00020075595,0.000027896325,0.00020896767,0.08158547,0.000019639132,0.000018432585,0.000570073,0.6859467,0.00012642471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004280982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009253655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67307454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005648573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015850315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157376267","doi":"","title":"Book Review – Breakdown: The Inside Story of the Rise and Fall of Heenan Blaikie by Norman Bacal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Corporate law; Business; Big business; Market economy; Law; Accounting; Finance; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.013652295920915658,"score_gpt":0.3326709989547796,"score_spread":0.3190187030338639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157376267","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032335274,0.38828745,0.000051428506,0.53358376,0.0005042858,0.00041047513,0.000007602029,0.000008465864,0.044811253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.847384,0.13598566,0.0000066982757,0.0054672575,0.00019560044,0.0000040264595,3.836397e-7,0.000006827936,0.010949601],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998559,0.00045372802,0.00021644997,0.000067469424,0.00027721797,0.00042615517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987712,0.00015220036,0.00061510573,0.0002531555,0.00017281366,0.000035511533],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042768526,0.000057874982,0.000112009955,0.000019854038,0.0016375529,0.00007070109,0.0005267232,0.000039061408,0.00010949414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011180392,0.000033490836,0.000060449027,0.00009765147,0.00047999804,0.0005178068,0.000040391667,0.0016339415,0.0000037608336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002240734,0.00016455853,0.007748457,0.000078063735,0.00018261708,2.6994758e-7,0.008976229,6.0958564e-7,0.00023674998,0.31690457,0.6115371,0.05414833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011652175,0.000030001354,0.002775749,0.0000819644,0.00004355743,0.000014844812,0.0019056534,8.494518e-7,0.000021733571,0.0049195853,0.9900446,0.000044953667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022279692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069047273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8150487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001516739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003931154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157466121","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Human Rights Law: Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Political science","score_opus":0.048354376906681554,"score_gpt":0.3532366546252945,"score_spread":0.304882277718613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157466121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010234324,0.00008944608,0.0000016717072,0.24169019,0.0024858438,0.00015485496,0.00007883437,0.00017730755,0.7553116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008023989,0.000042305077,0.0007166504,0.06115516,0.005306701,0.00002267385,0.0009436135,0.000031983032,0.9237569],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982889,0.00020008169,0.00038225198,0.00028300544,0.000577073,0.0002686495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884623,0.00032171246,0.00022708878,0.00023481365,0.0001377052,0.0002324536],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001675914,0.00016700767,0.00020817887,0.00006166373,0.001756594,0.000649515,0.0006125418,0.00023308792,0.03201023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022187717,0.00015367646,0.000055444852,0.00054164574,0.00016547267,0.0010945409,0.000058923408,0.00070896704,0.0002099262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.4841685e-7,0.000007058366,0.0000061525093,0.000007141965,0.000013042625,0.0000044721733,0.0006669791,4.8325823e-8,2.1162133e-7,0.4651444,0.53411436,0.000035769983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003750183,0.0000061817796,0.000009264093,0.000019197341,0.000018237259,3.2124422e-7,0.0010496605,2.813826e-7,0.000016317223,0.012209319,0.98641527,0.00021842617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45293507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017682211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0107085705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157467767","doi":"","title":"Archer Library: Justice Studies - Canadian Justice System: Students","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.08851303024101947,"score_gpt":0.45616521615822037,"score_spread":0.3676521859172009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157467767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045865905,0.000049768707,0.000010557718,0.08732555,0.0056678033,0.00021075878,0.0000066113244,0.00017705701,0.860686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9003524,0.000045946712,0.0013193302,0.005036136,0.0010570738,0.000024722816,0.0000052041078,0.000010470578,0.0921487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989047,0.00014042507,0.00016852656,0.00015515325,0.00033823255,0.00029296865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877983,0.00042699638,0.00006510401,0.00018077224,0.00023954664,0.0003077519],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007754838,0.00007603387,0.000089453846,0.00013781185,0.0012453104,0.0004764567,0.00038959194,0.00008431904,0.0021404375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018460361,0.000068772744,0.00002096433,0.000622417,0.00016364343,0.00120342,0.000036042296,0.0004204352,0.0008021084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018258462,0.00003537615,0.0029028314,0.00005197529,0.000032113763,0.0000037057096,0.021948613,4.7479648e-7,0.000015829512,0.7893211,0.18529119,0.000394943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065101834,0.0000048564293,0.00239942,0.000008127777,0.00014857626,0.0000012288302,0.14828637,0.0000043075515,0.000009785258,0.00029584122,0.8486806,0.00009578765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2760435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6428699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8544865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010052409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021201337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158131193","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v13i0.5663","title":"Piecing together a College Education behind Bars","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Bar (unit); Mathematics education; Psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.030098525799307007,"score_gpt":0.37866609022225856,"score_spread":0.34856756442295156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158131193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51058626,0.00025300786,0.0028041531,0.26564434,0.0039549964,0.00037618788,0.0000070925958,0.000043564127,0.21633041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98002464,0.000064046115,0.012137972,0.002685253,0.00078634545,0.000006270279,0.0000010816278,0.000014545764,0.00427986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849784,0.00018401652,0.00044262825,0.000112723894,0.00055006694,0.00021269247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983075,0.00021380895,0.00061051245,0.00014607779,0.00052886887,0.00019318305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014291452,0.000096112955,0.00015643725,0.00032661512,0.00049724255,0.0001434592,0.0002729262,0.00008853474,0.00035982256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015297259,0.000089314155,0.00010174298,0.00052708585,0.00010467071,0.0008983597,0.000012237441,0.0006192958,0.00008895211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013977554,0.0023080306,0.003168292,0.000010799536,0.00012775049,0.000014325651,0.122002386,0.0007580113,0.0008737848,0.7436377,0.10082917,0.026129983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093006337,0.0001801696,0.0020359163,0.00010037279,0.00005405036,0.000026650518,0.055910353,0.000002537507,0.0004271837,0.010360573,0.9297886,0.00018356933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010739784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051061704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8289594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052917964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005649689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158261163","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Other Research Guides and Search Engines","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.45664580636838203,"score_gpt":0.5781041279939393,"score_spread":0.12145832162555725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158261163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017877833,0.0010424264,0.0000022943534,0.27297384,0.0017362463,0.0012597457,0.00014238752,0.00010641871,0.7209489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038030695,0.0032098275,0.0020146582,0.001933335,0.010165708,0.00038131792,0.0001613023,0.00018227426,0.9439209],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785264,0.0086790705,0.00091107975,0.001335532,0.0067881723,0.003759747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96741533,0.012609887,0.00010869554,0.0014841167,0.016484277,0.0018976739],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0950897,0.00039000815,0.0004926962,0.0075908606,0.009947263,0.0057775863,0.0026646452,0.0019032777,0.019207882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043440383,0.00036898445,0.00010717213,0.008532063,0.006487127,0.0017312577,0.00059680815,0.016820483,0.0023417764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000984839,0.000054190827,0.00014021414,0.000056701047,0.00003543864,0.000020625808,0.009296328,3.6128236e-7,0.00005113014,0.28815138,0.699016,0.0031678202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012970854,0.00008325342,0.00016678183,0.0001450479,0.000007364432,0.000007696376,0.04932897,0.000010702681,0.000093356335,0.0064967736,0.94314367,0.00038665292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98586303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9754143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28165463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015413108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053458124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158317808","doi":"10.29173/mlj1073","title":"Law Students’ Responses to Innovation: A Study of Perspectives in Respect of Digital Knowledge Transmission, Flipped Classrooms, Video Capsules and Other Means of Classroom Dissemination","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Flipped classroom; Digital video; Transmission (telecommunications); Multimedia; Mathematics education; Computer science; Psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.06149793089186337,"score_gpt":0.41398645531271866,"score_spread":0.3524885244208553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158317808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96926105,0.00008614356,0.00018985031,0.0024968241,0.00015862806,0.0003638812,0.0000133956855,0.000009381391,0.027420862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923986,0.0000127252515,0.0002674065,0.000054665055,0.0001968027,0.000007783494,8.2390727e-7,0.000010838356,0.00020911738],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979952,0.0004341405,0.0007035363,0.00016725626,0.0005464856,0.00015336972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751633,0.00043435718,0.00041626304,0.00013488998,0.0014318628,0.00006628068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018059075,0.000103130296,0.00022227352,0.00044335728,0.0003966321,0.0001897457,0.00026483712,0.00006642753,0.00013512404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010049082,0.00009407285,0.000030505324,0.0014765895,0.00043671657,0.00079206313,0.000036317513,0.00025874772,0.0000026316534],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000757431,0.0035557756,0.10197372,0.00002906173,0.000109763794,0.0000023226671,0.5039581,0.0000018388589,0.0031926343,0.37636673,0.000897301,0.009155285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097461336,0.0008909005,0.07961521,0.00019248732,0.000036194444,0.0000070446595,0.863123,0.0000039302727,0.0011262562,0.0040540476,0.049822982,0.00015335756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074468246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14269038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3723127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012613097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026203357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159186993","doi":"10.1111/cars.12338","title":"Lawyers, immigration consultants and the 33 year jurisdictional war","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration law; Law; Settlement (finance); Political science; Citizenship; Immigration policy; State (computer science); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.04034684125477701,"score_gpt":0.32427450589621365,"score_spread":0.28392766464143665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159186993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27954203,0.06214643,0.000025936157,0.6241883,0.0013629865,0.0007320404,0.0004255167,0.000046652993,0.03153011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90415514,0.07357401,0.00038493815,0.02014354,0.00036470665,0.00008006833,0.00017246816,0.000011347198,0.0011137719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780476,0.0010302019,0.00034845513,0.00023295675,0.000059802464,0.0005238292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971767,0.0012090086,0.00021676955,0.00021947185,0.00081322977,0.00036479498],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030380983,0.00011052809,0.00031674455,0.00006240995,0.0007968543,0.00001946171,0.00022213682,0.0002454735,0.00066479505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008884405,0.00009750519,0.00009029607,0.0004176109,0.0022894084,0.00014537692,0.000019018766,0.00048784292,0.000026889737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005691592,0.000011577264,0.013121842,0.0002745999,0.00009083335,0.000013850548,0.044261552,6.469597e-7,0.00001921608,0.88225096,0.057636105,0.0023131391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005142695,0.000020870975,0.026962303,0.00044236882,0.00013821125,0.000028376768,0.11143418,0.000008507789,0.000004308835,0.03348656,0.82672495,0.00023509379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08474718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5599664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84876436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007457418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009175853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159571343","doi":"","title":"Archer Library: Justice Studies - Canadian Justice System: Citing Sources","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.08772302948420024,"score_gpt":0.405242015898382,"score_spread":0.31751898641418175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159571343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050550062,0.00007363393,0.000019074394,0.101865776,0.002938054,0.00012627164,0.0000049938744,0.00019965434,0.8442225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94101983,0.000028277045,0.0025235713,0.004389391,0.0016693474,0.000017189035,0.0000047362414,0.000011203206,0.05033644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901116,0.00013973478,0.00017682096,0.00015211232,0.00020337803,0.0003167984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985119,0.00077170494,0.000086415945,0.00014266775,0.0002233521,0.0002639467],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007962719,0.00007600861,0.000089519504,0.00014521301,0.0017659109,0.00044131867,0.00022981997,0.00008361459,0.0019232224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031681566,0.000069284884,0.00002278639,0.00063104194,0.00019975733,0.0011791951,0.0000235979,0.00044207452,0.0003655607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011157557,0.000010737889,0.00093167095,0.000070900576,0.000019932811,0.0000024993678,0.03437165,0.0000015243883,0.00003627273,0.89336354,0.07033397,0.00085616595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034581557,0.0000029677112,0.00036558806,0.000010703627,0.00010396737,0.0000017024909,0.27957496,0.000021119095,0.000024880046,0.00036469894,0.7194055,0.00008935228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31361583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57741344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8929989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000695281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020860138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159604639","doi":"","title":"Courts in the Digital Age: ‘Adaptive Leadership’ for Harnessing Technology and Enhancing Access to Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Politics; Economic Justice; Charter; Political science; Humanity; Infallibility; Sociology","score_opus":0.11864716947679212,"score_gpt":0.39645553995567795,"score_spread":0.27780837047888585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159604639","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074202344,0.00053362973,0.034457788,0.8840407,0.00023142734,0.00040858827,0.000001907373,0.00003287315,0.0060907356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99432963,0.00008089066,0.00015505034,0.004753841,0.00038860185,0.000015075803,7.9891254e-7,0.0000060009124,0.00027010948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872464,0.00007672078,0.00015097816,0.00011651093,0.00015320006,0.0007779561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939024,0.00031402573,0.0000956656,0.000042446816,0.00010327112,0.000054343647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014427897,0.00005850239,0.00007630125,0.00013444916,0.0006462719,0.0008296778,0.00030345906,0.000054753426,0.0000071866484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026312983,0.00004801045,0.000018204324,0.0008484428,0.000083134684,0.00094532,0.000020554096,0.0013051034,0.0000048465636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004172057,0.000031034095,0.00033569432,0.000006922321,0.000018161103,0.000002376687,0.03839184,0.000010555598,0.00010194729,0.914452,0.00064762,0.045960084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003781499,0.00022093611,0.0003956892,0.000028903782,0.000048797585,0.000046510515,0.66254616,0.000043474913,0.00006219426,0.17614827,0.15990812,0.00017282691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008979436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034539732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9201273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024354755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002907245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8000602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160389654","doi":"","title":"Marginalized Law Students and Mentorship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Mentorship; Scholarship; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.053062863946376326,"score_gpt":0.42725973909055354,"score_spread":0.3741968751441772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160389654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.511185,0.000931631,0.00023599919,0.16451047,0.0011901514,0.0002070745,0.0000010090768,0.00003636147,0.3217023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97744226,0.0018767825,0.000041768024,0.00048065977,0.0004028013,0.0000030072258,4.7870816e-7,0.0000049940545,0.019747218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985298,0.00014137026,0.000113089154,0.0000833727,0.0003211805,0.0008112113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999433,0.000050766273,0.00020055451,0.00012831262,0.00010057102,0.00008684079],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036567152,0.000051515497,0.00006401824,0.000034449324,0.0031342357,0.0012512743,0.00039848982,0.000040753457,0.00015492839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047067215,0.000047806203,0.000023643259,0.000048171154,0.0001831238,0.001011818,0.000030215366,0.0010768324,0.000032674045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011882023,0.000032991236,0.012490364,5.560268e-7,0.00003269078,5.310076e-7,0.0021973527,2.5669092e-8,0.000010196753,0.9819972,0.00026409392,0.0029621525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045031204,0.00003805108,0.007564682,0.0000062388713,0.000021402182,0.000022594042,0.00950022,4.6052196e-7,0.0000053949884,0.41585994,0.5664453,0.000085434396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006190344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025814965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5661812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003597383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022697274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160424393","doi":"","title":"Archer Library: SOC215 - Canadian Justice System: Home","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Library science; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.05180030175117876,"score_gpt":0.3654207439062683,"score_spread":0.3136204421550895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160424393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003505845,0.000009416023,0.000054226304,0.115277775,0.0013202071,0.000081192964,0.0000043730247,0.00012949268,0.87961745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8460255,0.0000046140353,0.0009775865,0.0060229483,0.00137557,0.0000066791745,0.0000056474632,0.0000066413977,0.14557481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993175,0.00011068631,0.00009750065,0.0001008737,0.00014105982,0.00023235279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935645,0.00010603556,0.000034372035,0.00011965346,0.00013053862,0.00025292765],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034757308,0.000042290405,0.00004474644,0.000105911124,0.00087445066,0.0003147078,0.00017799604,0.000060740207,0.014187016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026316004,0.000039878847,0.000014470096,0.0006262238,0.00016809315,0.0010142216,0.000010229338,0.00012129288,0.0028320206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.133457e-7,0.0000060178786,0.00042096604,0.000004952736,0.0000033722267,5.699078e-7,0.007277838,3.6254896e-8,0.0000023106159,0.6694051,0.32244945,0.00042856045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032159158,0.000007070586,0.0011072268,0.0000043291516,0.000015079629,6.8431973e-7,0.024624186,0.000012735185,0.00001199571,0.0007228744,0.9733955,0.00006614777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60552776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5599519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84251964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011872699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032741623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160901246","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics and the Political Activity of Government Lawyers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Duty; Politics; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Duty of loyalty; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Loyalty; Public administration; Fiduciary","score_opus":0.04122284085966671,"score_gpt":0.3664240374358169,"score_spread":0.3252011965761502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160901246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16319804,0.000021649625,0.000095847296,0.2637683,0.00052778947,0.00016440787,0.000013686262,0.000022529874,0.5721878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98871076,0.000013184085,0.0002460408,0.007362007,0.00047491706,0.000008713066,4.5577826e-7,0.0000042607808,0.0031796796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984824,0.0005684755,0.00012942194,0.00011593486,0.0005027073,0.00020107892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998253,0.0012095732,0.0000888545,0.00016708551,0.00015583393,0.0001256392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019355691,0.000055314413,0.00009084509,0.000009308897,0.00085185,0.000157418,0.0001477669,0.0000938101,0.0005154055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036145786,0.000041486317,0.000030466223,0.00019105121,0.0019101307,0.00049635454,0.000040707822,0.00062137604,0.000055948356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037106634,0.00003832783,0.00052723556,0.0000036638792,0.000010875341,1.6426587e-7,0.0036746364,6.07886e-8,0.00009946742,0.9935096,0.0018507959,0.00024805826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037763626,0.00003059258,0.001958256,0.000008685252,0.000019317322,0.0000011048057,0.008756692,0.000009026163,0.0012282116,0.015016005,0.97251934,0.0000751364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064405255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027570568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97849363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009788463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048063343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99017376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161935969","doi":"","title":"Towards an Ethical Infrastructure: Ontario's Incremental Developments Towards Entity-Based Regulation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Political science; Business; Public relations; Ethical standards; Legal ethics; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.023412099216300795,"score_gpt":0.35632487054967926,"score_spread":0.3329127713333785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161935969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8339329,0.000041643732,0.018590074,0.052864045,0.002578903,0.00032963944,0.000003396149,0.00011422034,0.09154522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99131703,0.000037895254,0.0033037583,0.0022946273,0.0010039171,0.0000056029667,0.00002914788,0.000011836998,0.001996199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997082,0.00040947672,0.0003303342,0.00020249034,0.0007758826,0.0011998407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884355,0.00003272188,0.00023398129,0.00013633276,0.0005846531,0.00016873919],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045935567,0.00012538893,0.00011244089,0.00017911289,0.0015893893,0.00039881788,0.00035293584,0.00025118384,0.0024039322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005163929,0.00012354078,0.0000521677,0.0005433844,0.00024322659,0.0010669086,0.000025041709,0.0035781637,0.00006388451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011057877,0.00015833363,0.011703427,0.000002330128,0.00009831297,0.0000010797338,0.023595525,0.000007746737,0.00037526735,0.90405595,0.002482282,0.057409152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089179806,0.00038767105,0.10913444,0.000016128333,0.00004698323,0.000052059764,0.010136461,0.000041182924,0.00046659203,0.3267841,0.5516792,0.00036338298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058486518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.540341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5772719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004748629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055267405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162214568","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-7106-4.ch005","title":"Incorporating Academic Strategy Instruction in Assignment Design to Remove Barriers to Writing Assignments in Philosophy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Jargon; Mathematics education; Curriculum; Computer science; Universal Design for Learning; Class (philosophy); Academic writing; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051483955205019576,"score_gpt":0.34738354585401665,"score_spread":0.29589959064899707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162214568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010298486,0.025987629,0.011381172,0.31807572,0.0086077005,0.010157198,0.00021502764,0.0008406623,0.6144364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43899125,0.060047872,0.40055677,0.0058129765,0.0022827964,0.0037280913,0.00032219835,0.00027837598,0.087979674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969217,0.00019333899,0.0010140244,0.00079316576,0.0006525268,0.00042521075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827194,0.00060452474,0.0004519059,0.00023491097,0.00026939702,0.00016733576],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010602903,0.0003867478,0.00041960488,0.0013631649,0.00049745786,0.00018237934,0.00038116376,0.00060982833,0.00032822794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024132733,0.00046512912,0.000041043986,0.00092836656,0.00054348464,0.0035635706,0.00013979136,0.0014295116,0.000013313976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009110051,0.000030270043,0.001173013,0.000027811135,0.000013483105,0.000006375038,0.0010912971,0.0039131064,0.0001008424,0.9330866,0.0003200392,0.060146067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035591592,0.00015988579,0.001154632,0.0010053078,0.00001006847,0.000035160727,0.025432987,0.000018426072,0.00023814665,0.7547706,0.2161028,0.0007161287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017778443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007267835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5264567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015895657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033477764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162561628","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Books","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06721405943993009,"score_gpt":0.35520114987588336,"score_spread":0.2879870904359533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162561628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[7.2577103e-7,0.0001838686,0.0000022070844,0.36036226,0.0020152777,0.00014996874,0.00009386441,0.0001740592,0.6370177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017048538,0.00039712415,0.0013667713,0.17336713,0.0041001854,0.00002314231,0.0005580035,0.000037603684,0.8184452],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986053,0.00016824383,0.0002968325,0.0002587503,0.00031977854,0.00035109534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870116,0.00025301147,0.00013552341,0.00021707159,0.00012423216,0.000569008],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024135967,0.0001475936,0.00017048509,0.00017621006,0.0008915612,0.0010706567,0.00055871723,0.00036009634,0.04101921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079950696,0.00015093606,0.00007320504,0.0005247215,0.00019880457,0.0012686764,0.00003508629,0.0007590165,0.001985283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.4243533e-7,0.0000030109948,0.000009286561,0.0000051435436,0.000009726804,0.0000033422914,0.0021447914,3.1385436e-8,6.818184e-8,0.46897402,0.52837306,0.00047715614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002665349,0.0000062569393,0.0000067984433,0.000017921522,0.000015873777,4.5393736e-7,0.003466955,8.820426e-7,0.0000035136688,0.0056295726,0.9906269,0.00019825227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9559061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9154517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46334442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015379855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018885598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163225829","doi":"10.32920/22223248","title":"Law and Technology in Legal Education: A Systemic Approach at Ryerson","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Key (lock); Engineering ethics; Legal practice; Legal service; Political science; Legal research; Practice of law; Law; Sociology; Engineering management; Computer science; Legal profession; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.034625928238473436,"score_gpt":0.36817964324492475,"score_spread":0.3335537150064513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163225829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12237564,0.00007769219,0.000008057179,0.105554774,0.00032091327,0.00018677635,5.9216615e-7,0.0001697701,0.7713058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518675,0.00003439528,0.00029984966,0.0008752768,0.00008109814,0.000074498115,0.0000071443355,0.0000034716809,0.046756722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994672,0.0000609858,0.00010798651,0.0001281707,0.00010184554,0.00013381748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996983,0.00007089802,0.00003559322,0.00008883337,0.000072108734,0.000034291876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045121097,0.00003803123,0.000055988927,0.00023374234,0.00030505986,0.000087201624,0.0000820483,0.00008124326,0.0001275644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020877013,0.00003743463,0.0000065541353,0.0019640212,0.0001418593,0.00035559776,0.000026743393,0.00012919537,0.0001794258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010327573,0.000031642798,0.0033125652,0.000007897694,0.0000016396376,3.1445867e-7,0.0047995537,5.5641436e-7,0.0000688939,0.9813584,0.009541741,0.0008757727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010131463,0.0000066338134,0.00079990824,0.000011881576,0.0000032087623,0.000014966731,0.091413654,0.000047976107,0.000028684071,0.0052236086,0.90225893,0.00008922062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009391495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051848423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011741305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005906196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163384500","doi":"","title":"Beyond Reconciliation: Decolonizing Clinical Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Colonialism; Legal education; Political science; Law; Indigenous; Sociology; Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.12303640261836599,"score_gpt":0.5184570339269928,"score_spread":0.3954206313086268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163384500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.162401,0.00005004197,0.0000124125845,0.3418004,0.0022296195,0.000058199315,0.0000017508148,0.000006138322,0.49344042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755048,0.00014891858,0.00046392248,0.008676815,0.012194999,0.0000012360871,7.691352e-7,0.0000041786598,0.0030043582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990375,0.00019398704,0.00038456862,0.000062381056,0.00020128842,0.000120242985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829245,0.00013614913,0.00084738596,0.0000787702,0.00054407533,0.000101197606],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018592565,0.000046745186,0.00013436402,0.00006258279,0.0026920747,0.0007249761,0.000192422,0.00010924465,0.000062451865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021100014,0.000045697452,0.0000757254,0.00006523792,0.0003843118,0.0017169189,0.000018936416,0.0003330392,0.000008339992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009443201,0.000069767055,0.0017657147,0.0000024623648,0.000015070481,5.870601e-7,0.0103579005,2.246942e-8,0.000003992775,0.94398934,0.010960878,0.03282484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020329648,0.00002967506,0.02496784,0.0000066439065,0.000019057861,0.000005838111,0.0035576473,4.1322545e-7,0.000003151298,0.031120477,0.94003075,0.000055209057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01195741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032966752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9290699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010719067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004510112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163465424","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Elaine Craig, Putting Trials on Trial: Sexual Assault and the Failure of the Legal Profession","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indictment; Sexual assault; Law; Criminology; Legal profession; Criminal trial; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.023494035817424954,"score_gpt":0.3835799421686114,"score_spread":0.3600859063511865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163465424","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03188012,0.044405356,0.00005022641,0.90928644,0.0015744666,0.0022384208,0.000002087966,0.000019471476,0.01054341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81492996,0.039874133,0.000042367767,0.025983538,0.0021563373,0.000052156312,0.0000032361838,0.000025285059,0.11693296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951529,0.0029363201,0.0005739974,0.00012392098,0.00059996865,0.0006129024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972195,0.0013374587,0.00096290256,0.00018735991,0.00025576865,0.000037029367],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02950422,0.00009207329,0.0002911226,0.00004612727,0.0008031901,0.00012437954,0.0003187926,0.00008660643,0.00039105647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008264928,0.000044722925,0.000110787485,0.00038444466,0.00014843134,0.00049304107,0.000028226705,0.002709424,0.000016010947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016466951,0.000115302224,0.000122004574,0.000039782433,0.00013520152,1.463978e-7,0.0041337684,0.0000025772508,0.0001757371,0.8264084,0.15192567,0.015294706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068099145,0.00018408941,0.00003333988,0.00020203386,0.00008442198,0.000015269326,0.011240318,0.000004182483,0.000025510039,0.011216934,0.9701139,0.000070121256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047172108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083987165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8833029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023492995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064734127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163505761","doi":"","title":"Increasing the Emphasis on Family Law Lawyering: Correspondent's Report from Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Emphasis (telecommunications); Law; Political science; Dispute resolution; Family law; Alternative dispute resolution; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.024021227547822942,"score_gpt":0.33412600042626256,"score_spread":0.3101047728784396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163505761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8074564,0.00023345287,0.00015813649,0.059717987,0.002105575,0.000090696485,0.0000038861695,0.000022285423,0.1302116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892048,0.00015480352,0.000037449034,0.004431893,0.0019015842,0.0000030206777,0.000004636259,0.000009966453,0.0042518224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770665,0.0004060557,0.00024504005,0.00013856162,0.0005491065,0.0009545951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987168,0.0004760275,0.00024660016,0.00019052655,0.00028285984,0.000087206],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036546504,0.00008266133,0.00008010305,0.000038670394,0.0021451684,0.00032152102,0.00033284444,0.000048411606,0.00023494138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012347656,0.000063661086,0.000037047364,0.00036293422,0.00018501912,0.0003665825,0.00001671841,0.001513252,0.000039818446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001398974,0.00007011057,0.0031007864,4.3394806e-7,0.00013849798,0.000026277685,0.0049792808,0.0000035240132,0.00040491854,0.96164864,0.015439331,0.014048282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011261522,0.000045936802,0.0022717717,0.00000884389,0.00001961422,0.00016621682,0.030174974,0.0000032086587,0.00006823882,0.03699815,0.93002653,0.00010388784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9712865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9246505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018336354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027608035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164888500","doi":"10.1097/jom.0000000000002393","title":"The Mindful Lawyer","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mindfulness; Meditation; Mindfulness meditation; Population; Trait; Depression (economics)","score_opus":0.047329742420902675,"score_gpt":0.3838200651676544,"score_spread":0.3364903227467517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164888500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6347334,0.0028916448,0.00023916886,0.33331904,0.001609611,0.000061006773,0.000005906235,0.0000035319338,0.02713673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992556,0.0008459327,0.00018852955,0.0015278934,0.0007486972,9.114575e-7,0.000005291953,0.0000018152855,0.0041249488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993014,0.000077507204,0.0001877872,0.000037215483,0.00033476957,0.000061361796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993252,0.0003792243,0.00014466552,0.000036993708,0.00004797139,0.00006594215],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005678517,0.000030450754,0.000052862146,0.000021196258,0.00041569927,0.000028568551,0.00005078506,0.00002001073,0.0010438367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054257456,0.000018592094,0.000017103326,0.00008605259,0.00028392932,0.00021803266,0.000009548696,0.00013429447,0.0000070693327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041750935,0.00061091187,0.17888919,0.000012758871,0.00024730648,0.00008731331,0.042779773,0.000019602385,0.005326751,0.3112225,0.24808124,0.21230516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019914846,0.000029817693,0.109895945,0.000009431385,0.000014266352,0.000046857098,0.013471142,0.0000027302813,0.000059813374,0.0014916788,0.8747547,0.000024454479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047604255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005941975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62667346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004092774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018169907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164958163","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3334506","title":"Pro Bono Is Pro, Low Bono is Low: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Lawyers’ Legal Aid Participation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative analysis; Political science; Law; Qualitative research; Public administration; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.04649425186983519,"score_gpt":0.44099900775625883,"score_spread":0.39450475588642364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164958163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.958212,0.00039248826,0.001201242,0.031488243,0.00019073697,0.00033571242,0.000017022528,0.000016928474,0.008145629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921604,0.0004917538,0.00028315815,0.00064187526,0.00007591617,0.000015594875,0.000010269299,0.000010155485,0.0063109025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732745,0.00057745044,0.0004764693,0.00023151119,0.0004881601,0.00089897664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808913,0.0004051416,0.0006197092,0.00013947868,0.00064895366,0.00009757686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041229934,0.00012488346,0.00028207176,0.00036232016,0.0004172152,0.00020055806,0.00016653966,0.00009062597,0.0006403933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068223255,0.00011651909,0.00012575094,0.0016798257,0.00018680208,0.0014616821,0.000016560129,0.0010788217,0.00005566062],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000919957,0.00019129812,0.0070234947,0.000012964778,0.0010029472,2.4958115e-7,0.2474843,0.000019645468,0.00023450499,0.7418157,0.0005844076,0.0015384994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016499859,0.0012154062,0.011645196,0.00008558154,0.0015179331,0.0000087971575,0.788633,0.0019166679,0.00093371887,0.13287756,0.05879288,0.00072329503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043768426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008456068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60893816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004988444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005350393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94913673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165184503","doi":"","title":"Beyond the Textbook: Assessing the Value of Scholarship in Undergraduate Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal education; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Empowerment; Political science; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.029943031594359633,"score_gpt":0.41410293655595076,"score_spread":0.38415990496159114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165184503","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3798521,0.0008545805,0.0002794621,0.47791076,0.001164336,0.0001829875,3.7745485e-7,0.0000079118145,0.13974752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99259835,0.0006786406,0.000052862335,0.0006861698,0.00050039164,0.0000061426726,6.555605e-7,0.0000065884933,0.0054701804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808323,0.00055061147,0.0002429034,0.00008818644,0.00035045037,0.00068460143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866563,0.00026560566,0.0005269409,0.0002766067,0.00023120634,0.000034016517],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081996815,0.00006398073,0.00007301317,0.00007452837,0.0031027547,0.0012488323,0.0007694553,0.000050402963,0.000026063834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023274096,0.000040407747,0.000049984053,0.00022587391,0.00029239026,0.002138429,0.000026881533,0.0026211212,0.00001200147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028778338,0.000054460605,0.008985509,8.581389e-7,0.000016099719,1.0319786e-7,0.001934795,0.000005469995,0.000053743683,0.9633934,0.00022889815,0.025323777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012893698,0.000016996317,0.04693396,0.00001924666,0.000020233389,0.000024452087,0.028546138,0.000010011002,0.00002861525,0.8704194,0.053786147,0.00006587547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007035699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023086883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6127463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005993947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025899615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165991118","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: SOC215 - Canadian Justice System: RefWorks Citation Manager","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Economic Justice; Business; Political science; Internet privacy; Public relations; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06630204940795446,"score_gpt":0.3736901965750643,"score_spread":0.3073881471671098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165991118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001899568,0.00018860771,0.0002527486,0.074693106,0.013402202,0.0004665944,0.000072004346,0.0003122828,0.91059345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013506177,0.00042749738,0.0037946766,0.0140331425,0.012129909,0.000103071274,0.0008097432,0.000077783094,0.955118],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972352,0.0004466141,0.00057125057,0.00044564312,0.000685417,0.00061588036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670875,0.000599642,0.00042338335,0.00046006835,0.001352361,0.00045581663],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020352763,0.00024948976,0.0002650546,0.000759284,0.0020949296,0.0012112705,0.0006378413,0.0008234249,0.008001551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030951446,0.0002580837,0.00009479162,0.0014870466,0.00028903154,0.0010802902,0.000030999723,0.00081596174,0.0033922289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015023728,0.000009319056,0.0000085728225,0.00014486858,0.000029370729,0.0000043653677,0.0054480922,7.799824e-7,1.3951842e-7,0.21674152,0.7766739,0.00093754346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055097833,0.000011329439,0.000054479802,0.00016840012,0.00027817578,0.0000019608387,0.049995415,0.000020332014,6.123455e-7,0.00067826395,0.94842434,0.0003116182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8453393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86941475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21606326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014696931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009717057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166490171","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2021.1921370","title":"Aspiration and reality in legal education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06685768084044458,"score_gpt":0.4181443211491431,"score_spread":0.3512866403086985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166490171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14657775,0.00009584253,0.00001537444,0.21912444,0.00023140745,0.00006979646,3.6280426e-7,0.000015357366,0.6338697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779517,0.000012648246,0.00009805313,0.003544946,0.00022773337,0.000013074544,0.0000062948184,0.0000022385098,0.018143326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993394,0.00034237318,0.00008377746,0.00007392611,0.000092375965,0.00006812299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969417,0.000071177245,0.000033311833,0.00010188739,0.00007921123,0.000020216557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085639703,0.000026051062,0.000031469062,0.000011722118,0.00026428877,0.00015409877,0.000046672274,0.000033800145,0.00038481934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003780124,0.000021675518,0.0000075392504,0.00025141114,0.000091468755,0.00043495116,0.000009751887,0.00016787897,0.000020748284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001292779,0.000071940514,0.0012300587,0.0000010963546,0.0000014631112,1.4894293e-7,0.012385057,4.576139e-7,0.000054510125,0.97071904,0.0035860047,0.011948918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004159581,0.0000024056046,0.016888933,0.0000032861994,0.000003811267,9.958045e-7,0.0104139885,0.000005586601,0.000040946466,0.014448335,0.95811576,0.00003434123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037061766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050156306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050289324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006866442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9693505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166507193","doi":"","title":"Disciplinary Responsibilities of Judges in Common Law Legal Systems: A Comparative Study in the Contexts of USA, England, and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JOURNAL OF LEGAL RESEARCH","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Discipline; Criminal law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Public law; Comparative law; Punishment (psychology); Private law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2544394981957635,"score_gpt":0.5118591958006414,"score_spread":0.25741969760487793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166507193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9520591,0.00029002866,3.5823055e-7,0.03605589,0.000078527875,0.00033456535,0.000009027906,5.2278534e-7,0.011171988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953073,0.00002138472,0.000008246541,0.00009312189,0.00009182873,0.0000061880555,3.5726373e-7,0.000002255061,0.0002459021],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446905,0.0035614874,0.00060668594,0.00008252075,0.0011155112,0.00016473854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947583,0.0040869075,0.00025306505,0.00009378233,0.00073232764,0.00007563415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008337539,0.00005167763,0.00028003767,0.00017299253,0.00018524495,0.00012660882,0.00032481778,0.000030086334,0.000023470846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018020718,0.0000356053,0.000019756566,0.00077827246,0.0004169072,0.0006212586,0.000051189836,0.00090691296,5.048024e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013260123,0.00062514265,0.33025545,0.00006555381,0.000039850118,0.00011640668,0.5266307,0.00007677046,0.00014852508,0.13678128,0.0038178642,0.000116463125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001003919,0.00095899333,0.14769211,0.00008828399,0.0000072981084,0.000011241174,0.78631186,0.00003615584,0.000039352457,0.00036262895,0.063429244,0.000058898222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8650925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97962743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2596812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016023741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003890683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69019043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167490272","doi":"","title":"Path-leading Explications of Justice: Illuminating, Disturbing and Inspirational (FOREWORD)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Path (computing); Sociology; Social justice; Law; Work (physics); Political science; Media studies; Law and economics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03567344649975973,"score_gpt":0.351452375601837,"score_spread":0.3157789291020773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167490272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5350814,0.0026311947,0.050983444,0.33443636,0.0006247263,0.00043440156,0.000012102868,0.000103233426,0.07569315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99677044,0.0009057957,0.0006088478,0.00070080167,0.0005080646,0.0000060073844,0.0000044064914,0.0000069381726,0.000488721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876463,0.00010180445,0.00025278397,0.00010892555,0.0002499984,0.0005218829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991701,0.00017603354,0.0002623931,0.000051529776,0.00024215017,0.000097740485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011734993,0.000060188653,0.0000854446,0.000059676528,0.00082743185,0.00010753944,0.00014424333,0.000044307886,0.000084478896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018147199,0.00006101554,0.00003143624,0.0004517049,0.00012334294,0.0006493993,0.00001700992,0.0010711357,0.000010656925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044303624,0.000026602056,0.0018161458,0.000009321855,0.00001862027,1.3725762e-7,0.014625456,0.000005265851,0.00029364304,0.9749491,0.000287145,0.007964114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010527351,0.00043219255,0.0054285345,0.00007709076,0.0003029591,0.000073088995,0.36103597,0.0007186149,0.00016978933,0.30894086,0.32119733,0.00057084055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023929481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006017173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6660083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028325582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037050329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65725696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168925064","doi":"10.4324/9781003104285-6","title":"The Problems of a Developing Profession","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.10394605336118191,"score_gpt":0.4040361158874381,"score_spread":0.3000900625262562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168925064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003937339,0.00024300563,0.000090167574,0.083010055,0.0006389352,0.00017998228,8.6188504e-7,0.000017516377,0.91581553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010979198,0.0008461066,0.0007259264,0.00043500453,0.00015524999,0.000010390834,0.000008512456,0.0000072917965,0.9967136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930257,0.000045851404,0.00021548942,0.00008951648,0.00025990818,0.00008664793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987552,0.0003519996,0.00023577236,0.00012651323,0.0005095899,0.000020902391],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006417203,0.000057100846,0.000079147714,0.000032132742,0.000622633,0.00009045307,0.00014232454,0.00012824943,0.0014272936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041162953,0.000037978374,0.000034112963,0.000080756785,0.00013166112,0.00012649855,0.000031694828,0.00028066314,0.00004466972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.542426e-7,0.0000030668393,0.000003374117,0.00001124401,0.000011121829,1.1664891e-7,0.0033333795,4.4006764e-8,0.000004000022,0.9766522,0.012797965,0.0071829017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015836295,0.00000224094,0.00000658888,0.00013063078,0.0000061170194,1.8292589e-7,0.0029904814,2.2411332e-7,0.000014916441,0.036123868,0.9606525,0.000056455825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059440616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033961579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9478545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006138159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003306087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169501030","doi":"","title":"Critiquing Instrumentalism in High Education: Lessons from Teaching as a Meditative Inquiry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"University at Buffalo; State University of New York Plattsburgh; Göteborgs Universitet; University of Toronto; Monash University; University of Technology Sydney; South Asian University; Eastern Michigan University; Flinders University; San José State University; Long Island University; Université du Québec en Outaouais; Colgate University; Manchester Metropolitan University; Kennesaw State University; Georgia State University; University of Regina; Middlesex University; Pennsylvania State University; Murdoch University; Anglia Ruskin University; Montclair State University; Dartmouth College; Washington State University; University of Pittsburgh; State University of New York; Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II; Federation University Australia; University of Washington; Arizona State University; National and Kapodistrian University of Athens; West Virginia University; University of East London; West Chester University; Boise State University; University of Washington Bothell; University of Missouri; San Diego State University; Kent State University; University of Massachusetts Dartmouth; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Sociology; Instrumentalism; Pedagogy; Holistic education; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047017127255586384,"score_gpt":0.4046240476756823,"score_spread":0.3576069204200959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169501030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6192967,0.0002879811,0.000028441538,0.17802206,0.0040143323,0.00015913596,0.000019659461,0.00007113328,0.1981005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771614,0.000058775306,0.0035027044,0.013105309,0.001720973,0.00005206452,0.00014967317,0.0000144743835,0.0042345943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786633,0.00079969433,0.00032070078,0.0003352172,0.00040408492,0.00027397784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855125,0.00062837184,0.000130133,0.00024268849,0.0002507371,0.00019679325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008294198,0.000117412805,0.0001566277,0.000094261035,0.0008398189,0.00051791815,0.00023608588,0.00012591733,0.003846636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036866742,0.00013931683,0.000043048956,0.00062372326,0.00021093954,0.0019634792,0.000062381434,0.0008553007,0.00040429016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050389203,0.00024369067,0.0013885449,0.0000040234513,0.000015774327,0.000009256509,0.0671288,0.0000020295183,0.00028063587,0.9161107,0.010358585,0.0044529405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003268259,0.0000121546,0.0045178407,0.0001283386,0.00001653511,0.0000035531177,0.22492635,0.0000022323743,0.0004915318,0.08440664,0.68494093,0.00022709096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15729533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050812963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.831704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037495923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035951238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170337952","doi":"","title":"INTERVIEW: Black Lives Matter—A Discussion with Two Civil Rights Attorneys","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil rights; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.025841521683132074,"score_gpt":0.3248196382406081,"score_spread":0.298978116557476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170337952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050982248,0.0002515737,0.00032627632,0.1718839,0.0012613994,0.00026698926,0.00001306248,0.00014880873,0.77486575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90476376,0.000035810688,0.0010456066,0.0072010565,0.0006393289,0.000026591,0.00003267198,0.000016521291,0.086238675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819833,0.00053880806,0.00025124042,0.00032232027,0.00038932046,0.0002999932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879783,0.00012655303,0.00014022546,0.00035833303,0.00034195563,0.00023511313],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053678465,0.00013723191,0.0001589968,0.000047046608,0.0008058255,0.000574505,0.0002562896,0.00006160243,0.017831137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020548454,0.00009102052,0.00006247099,0.00065874687,0.00030665446,0.0012788258,0.000060757247,0.00041457688,0.0037204265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035288376,0.000656621,0.011685251,0.00006226904,0.00011243265,0.0000637828,0.045475934,0.00001882157,0.00039419893,0.62591666,0.31391373,0.0016650426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026873033,0.000020126352,0.0019034252,0.000101437545,0.000023724026,0.000005256075,0.0069337436,0.000003936615,0.0003043112,0.004418648,0.9858225,0.00019418738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058624726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08969181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85378146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010950704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055612257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170637311","doi":"","title":"The 2010 Amendments and Hryniak v Mauldin: The Perspective of the Lawyers Who Have Lived Them","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Perception; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.04278632546046943,"score_gpt":0.34192084267721073,"score_spread":0.2991345172167413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170637311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07674493,0.0011836601,0.00009593047,0.87563926,0.00037170688,0.00025441698,0.0000021044175,0.000009854784,0.045698147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98706275,0.0035993543,0.000008094824,0.0020516033,0.00033302789,0.0000046007235,1.4189973e-7,0.0000062393365,0.0069341627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984311,0.0003815503,0.00016167079,0.00009620148,0.00033322148,0.00059627334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990188,0.00032406143,0.00025011925,0.000113894515,0.00023936466,0.000053793377],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018614077,0.00006825415,0.000071065835,0.000012310733,0.0019519822,0.00021385332,0.00044596277,0.000038372622,0.000076431555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087904127,0.000033261043,0.0000606057,0.00029468408,0.00040989876,0.00031179393,0.00004073268,0.00181072,0.000010106675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028421744,0.000018464196,0.0008997985,5.7532105e-7,0.00008758871,9.3361884e-8,0.053241376,0.0000022589677,0.00006750989,0.94013345,0.0037132765,0.0018071706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022967468,0.000072285555,0.0014611954,0.0000067597225,0.000042692584,0.000016041933,0.5831317,0.000034524106,0.00007400533,0.21605083,0.19880547,0.00007484072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018402489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037966266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91031784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035041705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033499107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172088261","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Nova Scotia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Law; Political science; Library science; History; Engineering; Computer science; Archaeology; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.07400327284376244,"score_gpt":0.36413539623045366,"score_spread":0.2901321233866912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172088261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000021827868,0.00022141033,0.0000031534069,0.37069038,0.0035204343,0.00017361829,0.00011849393,0.00016083107,0.6251095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055753174,0.00043714125,0.0029836579,0.19898383,0.006391501,0.0000084325075,0.0011572232,0.00006408808,0.7843988],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834883,0.0001778211,0.00036169702,0.00031781118,0.0003788216,0.00041500293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985084,0.00028394128,0.00016760988,0.0002621253,0.00017501919,0.00060291355],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029791152,0.00018075597,0.00021676815,0.00023154524,0.00059517997,0.0011442614,0.0006800381,0.0004219643,0.08425695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010709318,0.00018555486,0.00008430632,0.0010767978,0.00024275907,0.0016570298,0.000044599554,0.00085826206,0.006220479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.8003375e-7,0.000005697366,0.000044295284,0.0000080235795,0.00001440299,0.000004541941,0.0016431456,8.716163e-8,1.2638469e-7,0.42958018,0.5683363,0.00036269287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035345,0.0000074655973,0.0000194418,0.000027593234,0.000020868034,8.126677e-7,0.0028292488,7.6148854e-7,0.0000046109926,0.0025771083,0.99423516,0.00024155815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98533535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98508036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4270031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021276946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019028587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174042604","doi":"","title":"Attempts and Innovations Conducted in the Practical Teaching of the Course of “Laws of Agriculture, Farmer and Rural Area”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vocational education; Legal education; Course (navigation); Transformational leadership; Order (exchange); Agriculture; Subject (documents); Law; Sociology; Legal profession; Political science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Business; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.08870033518274506,"score_gpt":0.440219173114598,"score_spread":0.35151883793185296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174042604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8983991,0.000050751296,0.0000040336085,0.043376584,0.00041155666,0.0002087259,0.000005814227,0.0000030483473,0.057540372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988165,0.0000063837565,0.0002633489,0.0002663349,0.000067602945,0.000008846306,0.0000020087994,0.0000015987409,0.0005673953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880457,0.00025667952,0.00029011836,0.00009002537,0.0004597103,0.000098921264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981735,0.00027772924,0.00047197324,0.00009807783,0.00094412523,0.00003463582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020542121,0.000049096667,0.00010324432,0.00007741647,0.00032508737,0.000038485567,0.000219327,0.000048225837,0.000026648482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001178659,0.00003068679,0.000015560145,0.001790587,0.0018218863,0.00063896074,0.000032242755,0.00019078702,2.2405406e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034461343,0.00029281087,0.021208135,0.000007585696,0.0000035584997,1.0131716e-8,0.080390565,2.9485807e-7,0.004563544,0.88897395,0.0041239,0.00043220553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013518841,0.000019615893,0.81685936,0.000024356223,0.000017424074,0.0000015435443,0.14215986,0.000001124795,0.0004920858,0.0040520476,0.036182154,0.000055261306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003228711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000078978555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8849219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040415714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024770326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6712816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174194205","doi":"","title":"Book Review of In Search of the Ethical Lawyer: Stories from the Canadian Legal Profession, edited by Adam Dodek & Alice Woolley","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Alice (programming language); Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Art history","score_opus":0.022215281005356104,"score_gpt":0.3813972626674484,"score_spread":0.3591819816620923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174194205","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009308482,0.05176532,0.00001947093,0.9266991,0.0010036716,0.00036068336,0.000019862868,0.0000058104633,0.0108175855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9060387,0.03656676,0.000021874906,0.04692582,0.0011533236,0.000011635119,0.0000077305485,0.000011360614,0.0092628095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699754,0.001244589,0.00034586425,0.00009436504,0.00059026136,0.000727386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983926,0.00040897887,0.00024641,0.00017526529,0.00069892406,0.000077811004],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006490765,0.00006526707,0.00013065973,0.000047772162,0.0009599763,0.0000562706,0.00053092727,0.00013486671,0.0007270555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020838894,0.000039265284,0.00005034386,0.0008933705,0.0004820621,0.00030255507,0.00002369658,0.003954503,0.000006869926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002024789,0.00004616511,0.0017608852,0.000018759198,0.0000428282,1.687451e-7,0.015392846,2.1822349e-7,0.000058546833,0.26886803,0.7126098,0.0011814467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011509034,0.000035523797,0.0007482162,0.00034389805,0.00001639218,0.0000029523505,0.010957592,0.0000013975299,0.00006213258,0.0039357683,0.9837317,0.000049344155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6418684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93227935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8967302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008575291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039466906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175051833","doi":"","title":"Archer Library: Justice Studies - Canadian Justice System: Key Government Resources","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Key (lock); Political science; Business; Public administration; Computer science; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.056948520321827394,"score_gpt":0.36914701775394115,"score_spread":0.31219849743211375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175051833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02838051,0.00007264297,0.0000084652875,0.12965225,0.002795894,0.00015255739,0.000013494512,0.00012580541,0.8387984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87792724,0.000054730244,0.0020075084,0.0052150805,0.0012611691,0.000026123676,0.0000029293408,0.000011863055,0.11349337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876505,0.00015182112,0.00018265491,0.00017022231,0.00042926767,0.00030099982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986927,0.0005836062,0.000088009474,0.0001957389,0.00013701535,0.00030296278],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075236795,0.00008474221,0.000094252646,0.000060825998,0.0012878099,0.0003796192,0.00026898194,0.00008575789,0.0021843202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002156577,0.00007478476,0.00002420565,0.00048517573,0.00019517342,0.0009442639,0.000032449905,0.00040183356,0.0004004195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033301449,0.000022135175,0.0005636941,0.000057675155,0.000025957981,0.0000029854043,0.04013554,0.0000010877194,0.00003104494,0.7544587,0.2041368,0.0005610377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043238753,0.000005533991,0.000696525,0.000008576299,0.0001124764,0.0000010826018,0.21553421,0.000010171923,0.000019905148,0.00017462729,0.78330684,0.000086816144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24620709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6225777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84954673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020328411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012565331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175487271","doi":"","title":"Review of Edward Berry, Writing Reasons: A Handbook for Judges, 4th Ed.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Berry; Psychology; Biology; Horticulture","score_opus":0.027426808558616105,"score_gpt":0.37315158065819787,"score_spread":0.34572477209958175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175487271","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015221097,0.42888996,0.026921013,0.46722206,0.0011036306,0.001175281,0.00002315052,0.00008643647,0.07305635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.114394434,0.84904,0.0016148998,0.0044250195,0.0019348987,0.00006677522,0.000006145793,0.000028491151,0.028489351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981465,0.00018934222,0.00035729396,0.00011179435,0.00023696607,0.00095813104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984376,0.0004595026,0.00039094433,0.000112131056,0.0005265829,0.00007326113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055934805,0.00007155787,0.0001491108,0.00006719244,0.0004732505,0.000050945277,0.00022743753,0.000052044692,0.0003477262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003782558,0.000052188272,0.00010731382,0.00025125543,0.00009148087,0.0005557063,0.000011444264,0.00059631234,0.000027982567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017942564,0.000060439786,0.00050798315,0.00010875121,0.000067715075,1.3689721e-7,0.00055617065,2.9338588e-8,0.00014214226,0.8038975,0.0719283,0.12271287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000276051,0.0000795234,0.000027897006,0.0016939153,0.00004374451,0.000026979445,0.0022018151,2.3559616e-7,0.000028250775,0.07714134,0.918392,0.00008824165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035371352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014530767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84646374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064346724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00996226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99565035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176005882","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3524906","title":"Institutional Cultures and Legal Education at Select Canadian Law Faculties (DCL Thesis, McGill University)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Political science; Legal research; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.009227705532116794,"score_gpt":0.27735026100882526,"score_spread":0.2681225554767085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176005882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42332095,0.0008783801,0.000022156572,0.084437534,0.0009370955,0.00027065474,0.000032349097,0.000040874278,0.49006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92244464,0.0010627918,0.00004195906,0.00090104743,0.00018128235,8.279444e-7,0.000011512278,0.0000046119567,0.0753513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987089,0.0001368923,0.000098093864,0.00012483718,0.00019089079,0.00074039056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994761,0.000045399916,0.000084942076,0.000056768342,0.0001863881,0.00015045262],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006701013,0.00007500756,0.00006850087,0.00015679187,0.0020984593,0.00011074124,0.00015158117,0.00007633922,0.0002511523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009318472,0.00007293089,0.000032539323,0.00034472707,0.000107001695,0.0011116667,0.000011785396,0.0008774245,0.000088204884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000882428,0.000020931853,0.0009667198,0.0000013301923,0.000030102787,5.113665e-7,0.00078324764,0.000006416733,0.000039545554,0.99536747,0.0010555714,0.0017193297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012544231,0.000024555316,0.00075294916,0.000006013756,0.000015436888,0.00008171408,0.013005498,0.0000017996215,0.00001577035,0.015790837,0.97008026,0.000099724224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4487456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91162825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97957665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039696195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02148924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176181262","doi":"","title":"Judicial Education for Sustainability","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sustainability; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.05312950971850819,"score_gpt":0.5130948243564365,"score_spread":0.45996531463792834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176181262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059734106,0.000018997469,0.001678924,0.29809308,0.0018550116,0.00047687994,8.7560005e-7,0.000071914976,0.6380702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567249,0.0000021433207,0.0014040007,0.0015363843,0.0019277303,0.000058042875,0.0000039726137,0.00000359589,0.03833922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956006,0.000061461455,0.00006751592,0.000090293724,0.00009337242,0.00012731932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986554,0.00014263287,0.00004941133,0.000098724304,0.0010067294,0.00004712387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005893137,0.000029574152,0.000034375265,0.000037490703,0.0006159164,0.00007756714,0.000078097546,0.000038395152,0.0007560222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036089018,0.00003167383,0.000017536391,0.00031895924,0.00018405849,0.0002284562,0.000006112938,0.000057039477,0.00006824219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001175864,0.0000884821,0.0005432116,0.0000042721426,0.0000022566344,9.41282e-9,0.059617538,4.9490307e-8,0.000023109058,0.8054604,0.11743485,0.016814059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040115094,0.00002015029,0.0008027837,0.0000012129482,0.00000424217,7.0599434e-8,0.053465568,0.000003101822,0.00007191073,0.056081507,0.8894701,0.000039223247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008748364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025030181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89699084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017072468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037883702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99785244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176676922","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.12914","title":"Academic Librarians, Open Access, and the Ethics of Care","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Ethics of care; Nursing ethics; Information ethics; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Competence (human resources); Applied ethics; Framing (construction); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Nursing; Political science; Medicine; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.22987986170220975,"score_gpt":0.4842959798355384,"score_spread":0.25441611813332865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176676922","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054338656,0.027479792,0.00018746655,0.82865494,0.00026883115,0.00023392623,0.0000060950974,0.000008838654,0.08882147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96907645,0.02346759,0.0031717971,0.0036466816,0.000113191134,0.000003575615,0.000007246802,0.0000062966287,0.0005071895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622315,0.0028516361,0.00046694942,0.000074717296,0.00030230626,0.000081245955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953742,0.0026908084,0.00068207784,0.00031849951,0.00084899005,0.00008539381],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048188693,0.0000575153,0.00017662141,0.000085305626,0.00091079413,0.0056807464,0.0016387091,0.00018953362,0.000083378196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007507993,0.000043467953,0.00003664423,0.0006078513,0.00043247224,0.026404684,0.0005351266,0.002349235,6.532225e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007551329,0.000022582191,0.017924784,0.00001613953,0.000029919793,5.8410836e-7,0.11309806,5.8310206e-7,0.000045090397,0.8604382,0.0019973686,0.006351144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015877383,0.000034328976,0.06129387,0.00024405049,0.000101397396,0.000024588417,0.09941417,0.0000044353565,0.00024849895,0.16771583,0.6692135,0.00011762127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005478511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002431847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91473776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020195665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031486866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177139875","doi":"","title":"The Paradox of Elite Law Schools in India — A Comparison with Canadian Legal Education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Legal research; Socratic method; Internship; Empirical legal studies; Memorization; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics education; Psychology","score_opus":0.00840637305253825,"score_gpt":0.3210414724893791,"score_spread":0.3126350994368408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177139875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72250247,0.0012655237,0.000023601258,0.054242685,0.0005466065,0.000371122,0.0000013740854,0.000008448606,0.22103816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952763,0.00052866637,0.00004576802,0.00047055216,0.00013351435,0.0000075703088,0.000002488784,0.0000056439158,0.0035295007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836224,0.00020415003,0.0002318106,0.00007958099,0.00026005055,0.00086217787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999264,0.000107953514,0.00020916648,0.00011097608,0.00021312693,0.000094748284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002449842,0.000056503977,0.000088632034,0.00012727542,0.0004976902,0.00022610945,0.00023510086,0.000048463568,0.00005709623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016422788,0.000041817944,0.00002181912,0.0006059434,0.00007520881,0.000646596,0.000003963353,0.001884302,0.000043603653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016138545,0.000048454862,0.050257877,9.756088e-7,0.000017804019,9.364441e-8,0.0021310365,0.00000575244,0.0000072331636,0.9422475,0.00023272974,0.0050343834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034634623,0.00012738959,0.03008812,0.000050932264,0.000016002554,0.000022641532,0.116580434,0.000010101355,0.000014359885,0.06788503,0.7847186,0.0001400579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4713173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92843825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87436247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012588274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0550717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95028514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177333189","doi":"10.82308/35373","title":"Institutional cultures and legal education at select Canadian law faculties","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law; Legal profession; Sociology","score_opus":0.034131591323524495,"score_gpt":0.3078207849340397,"score_spread":0.2736891936105152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177333189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40122426,0.000113443544,1.4245438e-7,0.020199344,0.00058390194,0.0002735451,0.00027002674,0.00011546933,0.5772199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97817725,0.00006241103,0.00045186398,0.015505398,0.00017502152,0.00004246317,0.00010597576,0.000016258089,0.00546335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998331,0.00025895014,0.0002637407,0.00037160015,0.0003985062,0.00037618045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855804,0.00010916225,0.00011566002,0.00012290591,0.00041488092,0.00067937304],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045026068,0.00017372268,0.00014299416,0.00010591167,0.0050637587,0.0003207339,0.00023856526,0.00017819114,0.00071802095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016453301,0.0001830346,0.00005197754,0.0007013844,0.00029653453,0.0023414614,0.000053349024,0.0005814318,0.00031408403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011155791,0.000040008566,0.00015391034,0.00001095961,0.000021692695,0.0000032499013,0.00025652896,0.000007904736,0.0012033309,0.988726,0.0004944489,0.009070782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014808419,0.000022295317,0.0008892264,0.0000121038565,0.000021718399,0.0000130596745,0.0016877776,0.000004115105,0.0011595752,0.0043596094,0.99144083,0.00024163064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40232676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62679446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99094635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009318745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013244373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177627443","doi":"","title":"Understanding the Ongoing Dialogues on Indigenous Issues in Canadian Legal Education Through the Lens of Institutional Cultures (Case Studies at UQAM, UAlberta, and UMoncton)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Institution; Diversity (politics); Curriculum; Legal education; Political science; Modalities; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Law; Social science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.11983417439522653,"score_gpt":0.3889867036153102,"score_spread":0.26915252922008365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177627443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5968695,0.005320639,0.000046863537,0.38152415,0.0004528045,0.00028874213,0.000004711249,0.000009259786,0.015483293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115974,0.0053557595,0.0000127507965,0.0024446591,0.00044336307,0.000007160863,0.0000034582192,0.0000049231967,0.00056818005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855393,0.00027316282,0.00020982567,0.0001090136,0.00022196316,0.0006320733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992798,0.00032625248,0.00015448076,0.00006134987,0.00011638869,0.00006170695],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012394013,0.000082345294,0.00009920839,0.00006854727,0.002483438,0.00013950499,0.00015158326,0.000045803925,0.00001955901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011138956,0.000051753577,0.000030352547,0.0004303754,0.00033354238,0.0006327964,0.000016830994,0.0010580126,0.0000046874425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117650325,0.000022170876,0.0017007847,0.0000028924826,0.000050975326,0.000003274276,0.20342891,0.000056857345,0.000007147943,0.79352856,0.0006391551,0.00054752757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021340199,0.00013702584,0.000981349,0.000036693025,0.000042639203,0.00034686434,0.661067,0.000008357574,0.000017718094,0.0962948,0.24071108,0.00014307712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46107408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9607257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69723374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024046483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013627006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177800020","doi":"10.29173/mlj1264","title":"Reconsidering Legal Pedagogy: Assessing Trigger Warnings, Evaluative Instruments, and Articling Integration in Canada’s Modern Law School Curricula","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Legal education; Empathy; Psychology; Pedagogy; Software deployment; Law; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.08873743023764702,"score_gpt":0.38459004445253303,"score_spread":0.295852614214886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177800020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95816743,0.00019553475,0.00030559936,0.019884376,0.0009038395,0.00009643955,0.0000012338357,0.000013062233,0.020432482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675804,0.00006404885,0.0012711214,0.001476176,0.00033119842,0.000005787586,0.0000037897585,0.00000898654,0.00008082745],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812704,0.0005862526,0.00040566552,0.00017521455,0.00043869554,0.00026714223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988513,0.00020859273,0.00024374414,0.00007816091,0.00045255985,0.00016566213],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013567127,0.000099734345,0.00014195783,0.000068710164,0.0013882413,0.0013869455,0.00008162836,0.000053471053,0.0003056085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012213014,0.0001011051,0.000026516678,0.0002971979,0.00008760503,0.0026660948,0.000028209293,0.0009870668,0.000005506345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004193857,0.0002923865,0.09299404,0.000027178114,0.00012338815,0.0003326428,0.06793306,0.00054199446,0.0024204003,0.28120032,0.0017249231,0.55236775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015948846,0.000033525663,0.022437012,0.00057589205,0.0001052192,0.0005235368,0.79653394,0.008368277,0.0023385652,0.028433815,0.13839896,0.0006563442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9307841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7286009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001156128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070864353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181526594","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.1468","title":"Genetic counselors and legal recognition: A made‐for‐Canada approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill Genome Centre; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Genome British Columbia; Provincial Health Services Authority; BC Children's Hospital; Children's Hospital Foundation; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome Canada","keywords":"Harm; Genetic counseling; Constitution; Delegation; Order (exchange); Genetic discrimination; Political science; Law; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Genetic testing; Business; Genetics","score_opus":0.03487576295715966,"score_gpt":0.30984163755365374,"score_spread":0.2749658745964941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181526594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92711025,0.0071065356,0.024772698,0.029011087,0.0025449647,0.0002461234,0.000017840071,0.0000137733205,0.0091767255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9089167,0.003869776,0.0805649,0.0027200568,0.0018959187,0.000010034547,0.0000057652114,0.00001798877,0.0019988283],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998668,0.00013286654,0.00043855055,0.00012170747,0.00045685607,0.00018198535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766076,0.00034852268,0.00031829395,0.000079450634,0.0014583408,0.00013461035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080557575,0.00007567108,0.0001448577,0.000063401596,0.0004217004,0.0002728792,0.00010628368,0.00005629536,0.00018159283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007581389,0.000078825564,0.00004611219,0.00034477818,0.000065450535,0.000228251,0.000006011418,0.00024463248,0.000001512864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004132015,0.0011578584,0.009419626,0.0005175933,0.0009990145,0.0005535536,0.10849725,0.0033022035,0.005222068,0.013843797,0.22963841,0.6264354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042221093,0.00003790098,0.0022333104,0.000037567497,0.000095150535,0.00046027603,0.020702278,0.00027946592,0.00006106888,0.0016512229,0.97385955,0.0001599724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018448988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048989847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74422115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109596294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066124042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181847043","doi":"10.15446/anpol.v34n101.96562","title":"Abogados al por mayor: la educación jurídica en Colombia desde una visión comparada","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Análisis Político","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020484854486104133,"score_gpt":0.4032086305759198,"score_spread":0.38272377608981567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181847043","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20859388,0.00077256653,0.000054240823,0.5397105,0.0034459117,0.00041514734,0.0001517489,0.00016435317,0.24669166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96757066,0.0012763294,0.0011522432,0.016519208,0.00095911714,0.000038969556,0.00011929452,0.000048196456,0.012315958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955895,0.0013837541,0.00071008905,0.0006692504,0.0009000744,0.00074736367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956895,0.002126414,0.00041049716,0.0006621529,0.0006587834,0.00045264437],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012497418,0.00035560274,0.00048170894,0.00021775701,0.0011159797,0.0015583716,0.0006037678,0.00038776395,0.008254652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023103724,0.00040081964,0.0002311998,0.002351483,0.0004990084,0.0011184104,0.00016381335,0.0010372371,0.002150339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052426403,0.0017785984,0.005853965,0.000068736794,0.00025956612,0.000054318643,0.016604826,0.0000051561187,0.00093066774,0.52965724,0.4302595,0.014475026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052360876,0.00007436007,0.019911159,0.00011111648,0.00017490987,0.000028838866,0.01524375,0.000042580523,0.0007009946,0.0021059278,0.9606144,0.0004683733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062701674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000801509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7589768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030093276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005009947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W318445458","doi":"","title":"The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Beginning to Examine the Implications for Canadian Lawyers' Professional Responsiblities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Law; Dignity; Human rights; Impartiality; Constitution; Order (exchange); Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.044012435390449675,"score_gpt":0.3690725844420803,"score_spread":0.3250601490516306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W318445458","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22985676,0.00026996547,0.00042310878,0.75045794,0.00053867523,0.0007893403,0.00002599979,0.00001044262,0.017627746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97626555,0.00003726902,0.000029450925,0.00092507765,0.00041412047,0.00013767592,0.0000031570664,0.000006226706,0.022181489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823856,0.0003832397,0.00016228063,0.00006738184,0.0002109229,0.00093759096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645174,0.0028501898,0.00014225127,0.00016526651,0.0002892923,0.000101241516],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005404127,0.00006392633,0.000055496712,0.00007818264,0.0053289887,0.00013380467,0.00029901863,0.000032682387,0.00006163046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014423943,0.000028693099,0.000044564702,0.00044087812,0.0003166509,0.00031420827,0.0000072119365,0.00076452334,0.000006203984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042983786,0.000026030666,0.0010926031,7.323473e-7,0.000033144996,3.7825685e-9,0.024185147,0.0000018359468,0.000008506211,0.9674069,0.006715528,0.00048655024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081406004,0.00009160356,0.003933447,0.0000137305715,0.000019562201,0.000007011145,0.2499102,0.0000014426997,0.000011149895,0.08177518,0.66410345,0.000051788204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03420226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54359174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88563174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007063874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008295071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99732697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184491783","doi":"","title":"In Memoriam: The Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family, 1987–2018","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07564549681588184,"score_gpt":0.3935191889132581,"score_spread":0.31787369209737626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184491783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029566905,0.00018962473,0.0000030018618,0.33037934,0.0032532008,0.0011384393,0.000015648322,0.000014109597,0.63543975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96470577,0.000045007047,0.00014204219,0.020967748,0.0009911051,0.00014754492,0.0000070414526,0.000007769558,0.0129859885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998498,0.00045254527,0.00016448705,0.00017423919,0.0003412902,0.00036938928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983464,0.000966402,0.000045818677,0.0002927943,0.00019939587,0.00014918351],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005454359,0.0000631947,0.00009303188,0.00006941955,0.0021585228,0.0006644865,0.00039174856,0.00008988311,0.00026339816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012473234,0.000040845764,0.00002691846,0.00065801304,0.0010904802,0.0009418292,0.00003438267,0.0006052388,0.00035118737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016195283,0.000009217753,0.00024403188,0.0000029559733,0.000005679498,3.9878523e-7,0.005690553,0.0000020551356,0.0000064813867,0.9465825,0.04736106,0.0000788548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045064132,0.000010195053,0.00056661083,0.000007700618,0.0000037151651,5.243284e-7,0.006350272,0.000011995929,0.0000062619647,0.03537097,0.9571609,0.00006022017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96861136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9351388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023483032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002152729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184497846","doi":"","title":"JUDGING SEXUAL ASSAULT: THE SHIFTING LANDSCAPE OF JUDICIAL EDUCATION IN CANADA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Parliament; Judicial discretion; Law; Judicial independence; Political science; Politics; Judicial activism; Economic Justice; Judicial review; Sexual assault; Judicial opinion; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.025505157438826056,"score_gpt":0.3330110142190754,"score_spread":0.3075058567802494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184497846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14652333,0.011814389,3.7430317e-7,0.58470744,0.0011829005,0.0008814886,0.000010240766,0.000005930883,0.25487387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98253644,0.00080102094,0.000009077213,0.015097376,0.00014553135,0.000013708151,0.0000072318317,0.000004367102,0.0013852464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990225,0.00030037333,0.00020202935,0.00007577535,0.00022464937,0.0001746646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992514,0.00022521534,0.00012846665,0.00018577295,0.00013246527,0.000076647426],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017997395,0.00004579194,0.00010148438,0.000040790346,0.00031750242,0.000041062856,0.0002759762,0.000023202645,0.0013787589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008833179,0.000031078685,0.000014208706,0.00062548125,0.000037492206,0.00013661844,0.0000073176648,0.0002635786,0.000059357924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021184737,0.000023918696,0.15028584,0.00040258118,0.00002492079,0.0000010936748,0.017447516,0.000021569878,0.0000052189266,0.37093592,0.26731125,0.19353808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002338372,0.000001908037,0.022053288,0.00023416652,0.000012192111,7.0373403e-7,0.0071560615,0.000007641,4.863373e-7,0.00014118198,0.9703179,0.00005109019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83601314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005696759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053213418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184928670","doi":"","title":"Public Service and Charter Pessimism: A Review of Harry Arthurs, Connecting the Dots: The Life of an Academic Lawyer","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Charter; Law; Public service; Political science; Service (business); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Business; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1445255684940864,"score_gpt":0.411573877956851,"score_spread":0.2670483094627646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184928670","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000028726352,0.89715195,0.0000018412478,0.0889028,0.00044342715,0.0007475864,0.000043932723,0.000024979545,0.012654731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00023325346,0.9796791,0.00006892917,0.018634288,0.0006764302,0.000115081115,0.00007202713,0.000024996401,0.000495885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956962,0.0022012712,0.0009688407,0.0003284777,0.00052435213,0.0002808646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954308,0.0016052653,0.0013049553,0.0006578664,0.0008029029,0.00019819853],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048021157,0.00023031802,0.00089779677,0.00005736057,0.00077839487,0.0002755,0.00084818585,0.0002902287,0.0018425039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054002902,0.00013893763,0.00019270454,0.0015457756,0.00032028128,0.0009761235,0.000120770135,0.0016299364,0.000044601915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024710146,0.00012303794,0.000017996827,0.03560386,0.00035546315,0.0000016882432,0.007798465,1.0789787e-7,0.0000014023454,0.4946162,0.026345018,0.43513426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054036143,0.000007538483,0.000005898142,0.018227316,0.00038562465,0.000010383939,0.0027586375,5.7814657e-7,4.5549987e-7,0.0001867354,0.97821003,0.00015275805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00250755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023437154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.951865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044821285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028637152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185595457","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3686","title":"Courts Without Cases: The Law and Politics of Advisory Opinions by Carissima Mathen and Seeking the Court’s Advice: The Politics of the Canadian Reference Power by Kate Puddister","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Power (physics); Advice (programming); Political science; Subject (documents); Legal advice; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.03325792737775149,"score_gpt":0.33112841050895153,"score_spread":0.2978704831312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185595457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018873349,0.002039438,0.000024957535,0.3778936,0.00064370054,0.00029012113,0.0006560517,0.000010586476,0.5995682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990101,0.00018371262,0.000059461017,0.0069680028,0.00012038083,0.000004424316,0.000010526477,0.000011539753,0.0025409746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981738,0.0006237311,0.00033295518,0.00012117267,0.00042271623,0.0003256736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979177,0.0007095733,0.00034916672,0.00030775028,0.00053189025,0.0001839246],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011340365,0.00011198067,0.0001373447,0.000018922523,0.00443141,0.0004989677,0.00039181704,0.00009108888,0.00017479138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040929328,0.000057572313,0.00004635563,0.00018073361,0.0012465513,0.0002883142,0.00006630777,0.0007835271,0.0000015778528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019012448,0.000028450258,0.0011465786,0.0000060906223,0.000043030945,0.000001801141,0.015737858,0.0000014358,0.000033832963,0.9630864,0.019875187,0.00003739712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001749747,0.000020441563,0.0011255322,0.00006284847,0.00009637611,0.00022983625,0.04226378,0.000026992459,0.00007135486,0.028089276,0.92772627,0.00011230159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68453115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8290837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97122765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103610204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017796068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186677518","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3684","title":"Law and Living: Connecting the Dots: The Life of an Academic Lawyer by Harry W. Arthurs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Meditation; Law; Legal education; Work (physics); Legal profession; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering; Theology","score_opus":0.04836196825363424,"score_gpt":0.3664124569228177,"score_spread":0.31805048866918345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186677518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043564755,0.0019347918,0.00007200619,0.22377975,0.0007849597,0.00010234172,0.000008803808,0.000023521106,0.72972906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878811,0.00035557663,0.00018222332,0.010327879,0.00054130197,0.0000025923027,0.0000017150913,0.000008629065,0.00069896615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983412,0.0007319287,0.00028451273,0.00011303078,0.00032922128,0.00020009928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979248,0.0011940742,0.00029456863,0.00014980511,0.0002941601,0.00014260516],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024485968,0.00007158783,0.00009855951,0.000014144827,0.0026349043,0.00049339916,0.0002741534,0.000089894245,0.000795522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017864181,0.00004620802,0.000040529325,0.00024471688,0.00040229372,0.00092966144,0.00004016458,0.0011450679,0.000010024885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034385764,0.0000422706,0.00022346794,0.0000025369593,0.000029680317,0.0000015206459,0.015237431,0.000004536681,0.00051510014,0.9786399,0.0042045405,0.0010955625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001696636,0.00002553487,0.00041739712,0.000058992504,0.00005935407,0.0001282787,0.07736467,0.000029254139,0.0005218519,0.037909485,0.88318574,0.0001297953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020919198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08512951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9443164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023807399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044453668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186913287","doi":"","title":"Lawyering at the Intersection of Public Law and LegalEthics: Government Lawyers as Custodians of the Ruleof Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Custodians; Law; Public law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Commercial law; Private law; Comparative law; Legal profession; Legal history; Intersection (aeronautics); Government (linguistics); Chinese law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02737623722551455,"score_gpt":0.3189949639396431,"score_spread":0.2916187267141286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186913287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35612124,0.000027271442,0.000019915211,0.058983635,0.0016871274,0.000120787634,0.000011214445,0.000011396405,0.5830174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99520993,0.00003269011,0.00010398017,0.003183404,0.0003173113,0.000004192638,7.209146e-7,0.000009204185,0.0011385669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984226,0.00031197185,0.000312533,0.000101482685,0.0006539486,0.00019742615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986762,0.00032034796,0.00043916397,0.00021541747,0.0002550417,0.00009387572],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002345861,0.00008019046,0.00010684724,0.000014447381,0.002064729,0.0002914961,0.00032809033,0.00010501849,0.0006460942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004494561,0.0000521349,0.00007753727,0.00023166758,0.0015252406,0.00078190444,0.000094120296,0.0011000409,0.000009273143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008522102,0.000048001588,0.00063470344,0.0000058363803,0.000027706661,5.2605486e-7,0.014338488,0.0000035370917,0.0035257197,0.98008215,0.00059359544,0.00073119794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016328313,0.0000278458,0.00061721914,0.000020404805,0.000029773226,0.000055066175,0.014523647,0.0000053598555,0.0034831755,0.006184848,0.97481215,0.00007721018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040584505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40642443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97421855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013127315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028896882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187555222","doi":"10.30970/vla.2021.72.027","title":"FEATURES OF LEGAL EDUCATION IN THE LEADING UNIVERSITIES OF THE USA AND CANADA AS AN EXPERIENCE FOR THE LVIV UNIVERSITY","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Visnyk of the Lviv University Series Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal education; Canon law; Decree; Perfection; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Legal history; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016451854379689903,"score_gpt":0.297923230882028,"score_spread":0.2814713765023381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187555222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9119824,0.000036308524,0.0000067730766,0.036634583,0.00039202557,0.0001996547,0.00003720009,0.0000032296423,0.05070783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97798127,0.000051309165,0.00006380071,0.0004297287,0.000022931512,1.7228477e-7,0.0000019314696,0.000001883593,0.02144696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991458,0.00035159852,0.00007813412,0.00009951988,0.00022321484,0.000101700665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988369,0.00042275054,0.0001792077,0.00025670548,0.00028195695,0.00002248835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002561774,0.000056261535,0.00008653559,0.00002943731,0.0010861813,0.000035931385,0.0006262812,0.000039930077,0.000040163097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014635308,0.00003823356,0.00004522958,0.0005576534,0.000862784,0.0009112277,0.000100633166,0.00014265334,1.01290155e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004691928,0.000044526423,0.0024923268,0.00001238183,0.000015874828,5.49533e-7,0.051016387,0.00002127544,0.00023372372,0.9441314,0.0018235472,0.00016111943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000857068,0.000012453384,0.021961246,0.000014573383,0.000031396332,0.0000018018428,0.556954,0.0000019169465,0.0011663222,0.00024781888,0.41948175,0.000041012136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82678485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9536956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94388354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017741806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038177434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83541375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187830841","doi":"","title":"Critique-Inspired Pedagogies in Canadian Criminal Law Casebooks: Challenging \"Doctrine First, Critique Second\" Approaches to First-Year Law Teaching","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Criminal law; Political science; Comparative law; Criminal procedure; Casebook; Sociology","score_opus":0.10005080686556474,"score_gpt":0.35492270524034897,"score_spread":0.25487189837478424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187830841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05676727,0.00038855223,0.0000705225,0.15737005,0.0007039351,0.00050534104,0.0000674727,0.0001925215,0.78393435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976658,0.00003805254,0.0026270822,0.01342636,0.0006930929,0.0001709117,0.000044439843,0.00003756675,0.0063045127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709845,0.00049055,0.00049571705,0.00057572534,0.00040358087,0.0009359584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978836,0.0005409554,0.00009050799,0.00045387528,0.00025728805,0.00077378226],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017273102,0.00025485398,0.00030468602,0.00021124318,0.0025342428,0.00094057823,0.00041814314,0.00023005524,0.0022325525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018569985,0.0003136789,0.0000965809,0.00050741306,0.0002342166,0.0016246308,0.00008363527,0.0012075044,0.00018334207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008844782,0.00009576549,0.0005431788,0.00008017326,0.000016607786,0.00012104136,0.02493623,0.000065290216,0.000014019745,0.9713528,0.002583213,0.00018282779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028154795,0.000030217283,0.0004228761,0.00012911313,0.000020472178,0.000019172969,0.04872352,0.000029295374,0.0003047008,0.0052288077,0.9444034,0.00040689186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9104362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.966124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076010916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019976075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189926638","doi":"10.29173/mlj881","title":"An Interview with the Justice Minister and Attorney General of Manitoba","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.05666679287744096,"score_gpt":0.3491795685288526,"score_spread":0.29251277565141165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189926638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75330895,0.00010804669,0.0013152465,0.091698125,0.0010251646,0.00015689906,0.0000026269872,0.000017497969,0.15236743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99203074,0.000035351,0.00092667644,0.0055827657,0.0012409443,0.000003061155,0.0000010514082,0.000007263884,0.00017214884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884224,0.0005201938,0.00017454063,0.00008383943,0.0002374241,0.00014176985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991255,0.0001944496,0.00019986228,0.00013200848,0.00025065476,0.00009752343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014041254,0.00006626984,0.00008751343,0.000030411227,0.0010268491,0.00042178205,0.00023122862,0.000035338206,0.00016175186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010146296,0.000041678817,0.000021916752,0.00013982432,0.00030575285,0.0005989268,0.000015827696,0.0003169499,0.000013020241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043015534,0.0001894458,0.0039464156,0.000050423347,0.00006119313,0.000003950631,0.014114134,0.000009594906,0.00016092247,0.9125747,0.017261123,0.051585097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017119835,0.00012086049,0.0066398913,0.000022553004,0.000102193655,0.000059638904,0.07534758,0.000031345477,0.000024608047,0.000761292,0.91663814,0.00008072268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009736711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2976284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9118134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032374082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011084109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190552066","doi":"","title":"Administering Justice and Serving the People: The Tension between the Objective of Judicial Efficiency and Informal Justice in Canadian Access to Justice Initiatives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Adjudication; Legitimacy; Political science; Procedural justice; Civil procedure; Proportionality (law); Law; Public administration; Dispute resolution; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.04239961594552765,"score_gpt":0.3928757516428561,"score_spread":0.35047613569732844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190552066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85624206,0.0002841549,0.00036562965,0.1221453,0.0005710855,0.00036541812,0.000005610158,0.0000067722067,0.020013984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973272,0.00085509114,0.000013098818,0.0011706053,0.00055984233,0.0000071804657,4.8578124e-7,0.0000057699613,0.000060707476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820817,0.00027797275,0.00025278464,0.00011197643,0.0002622424,0.0008868653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795395,0.0011338784,0.0003426297,0.00017812816,0.0002742514,0.00011715332],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049514794,0.00009033331,0.00011451542,0.00011293502,0.0062045376,0.0008116398,0.00071770913,0.000053476884,0.000007789586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006134281,0.000053111416,0.000019057028,0.0004069377,0.00029030858,0.0014361201,0.00013881465,0.0014969652,0.0000016174789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001226155,0.000050775965,0.098390006,0.0000851018,0.00012649839,0.0000030284243,0.41365877,0.00016569388,0.000035696485,0.45245728,0.000248927,0.03465561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019807367,0.00008643876,0.7391268,0.000045106088,0.00037366533,0.000031791868,0.2526129,0.00019586153,0.000004645962,0.0034702884,0.0037447936,0.00010963234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23655204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86585927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6407368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002833245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083254855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190782478","doi":"","title":"Sector Guides: Solicitor, Legal Executive and Other Legal Roles: Canadian law students at Sussex","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal research","score_opus":0.051960532557879247,"score_gpt":0.3976894818579523,"score_spread":0.34572894930007303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190782478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001347018,0.0002873906,0.0000024099593,0.033640858,0.0043208217,0.000553558,0.00036586943,0.00009289692,0.95938915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.063880675,0.00022992457,0.00017404891,0.02106524,0.004522386,0.00006872768,0.00013012237,0.00007084787,0.90985805],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711734,0.00028416267,0.00045135172,0.0005557363,0.00087158324,0.00071980874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759954,0.0002905148,0.00045295642,0.00055815134,0.00048300665,0.00061583926],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010705899,0.0003560039,0.00039693783,0.00029224745,0.0035054088,0.0032452256,0.0011089877,0.0006196781,0.0045648804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009407023,0.00034034718,0.00009976599,0.00021377711,0.0007952108,0.0014836794,0.00015348595,0.0007625998,0.000337083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006467998,0.00003477252,0.0013304392,0.000012536981,0.00009597134,0.000010904889,0.008544775,1.4833064e-7,0.000002200295,0.26121026,0.7286047,0.00014682165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002036516,0.000023605067,0.00030449053,0.000063026964,0.00005747799,0.0000060738175,0.008277427,0.000001055853,0.0000113725255,0.00032527404,0.99030167,0.00042488205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9866999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26169696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010190798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006344051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191674255","doi":"","title":"Education Without Representation: Cultural Fluency, Diversity, and Dispute Resolution in the Canadian Context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Cultural diversity; Indigenous; Fluency; Reputation; Representation (politics); Population; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.040408789041762275,"score_gpt":0.3778882943850038,"score_spread":0.33747950534324156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191674255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7721297,0.00051529927,0.000098895514,0.16706803,0.000764248,0.0002329657,9.720218e-7,0.000011278636,0.059178613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948229,0.0004115452,0.000031658295,0.001575347,0.00070221856,0.000004455658,0.0000036657257,0.0000024878539,0.0024457313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986273,0.0003145574,0.00012259741,0.00009736128,0.00023372694,0.00060444034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993934,0.00005206485,0.000094017676,0.000075056814,0.00031065135,0.00007481482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021541952,0.000048536705,0.000046115747,0.00011661329,0.0041589905,0.00027087415,0.00019651662,0.000048620055,0.00005081774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000443378,0.000038299153,0.000016950198,0.0004830665,0.00021959301,0.0009573028,0.00002462681,0.00088251085,0.000019366411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009311603,0.000026996131,0.09011718,4.7404365e-7,0.0000105324,2.425248e-7,0.07379556,3.7262757e-7,0.0000025574484,0.82072675,0.0028207875,0.012489244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033741785,0.00009737424,0.1494121,0.000016497968,0.000030303127,0.000121630386,0.34999967,0.000026227946,0.000002433651,0.21551612,0.28428286,0.0001573611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6656562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9830306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6052106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011660553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01082606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193329648","doi":"","title":"Pragmatic and Logical: The Supreme Court of Canada's White Burgess Decision","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Safeguarding; Impartiality; Law; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Economic Justice; White (mutation); Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01498182470299333,"score_gpt":0.3097276262568572,"score_spread":0.2947458015538639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193329648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34494337,0.0010545554,0.009437057,0.6220501,0.0007260058,0.0002264617,0.000004684588,0.000015948557,0.021541782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99365443,0.0015116778,0.00006283645,0.0003221654,0.00014873796,0.0000022096388,2.0616649e-7,0.0000037996695,0.00429394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985143,0.0002029381,0.00020202539,0.00006910167,0.00036606667,0.0006455847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987344,0.0007024267,0.00018770996,0.0000867104,0.00022550511,0.00006320945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035897985,0.000049239927,0.00007505382,0.00003433809,0.0005379597,0.00005957794,0.00019291416,0.00003391746,0.00025616458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017708454,0.00002502698,0.000020306594,0.00021524771,0.00012048985,0.000269116,0.000013941953,0.00058283086,0.000002497301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021427453,0.000032475524,0.0066580884,0.0000015734089,0.000037618123,5.113282e-7,0.0020249204,0.000001588388,0.000121328696,0.9349906,0.008257379,0.047852512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038839446,0.00007337976,0.010756385,0.00004484565,0.000028191702,0.00007274728,0.01938097,0.0000070204433,0.000021591095,0.5254169,0.4436869,0.00012268504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058894396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72379625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66490185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004773239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013457681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193978425","doi":"","title":"Entretien avec Suzanne Côté (Interview with Suzanne Côté)","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.017797046537641466,"score_gpt":0.2981740987277788,"score_spread":0.2803770521901373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193978425","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06887391,0.0500616,0.0024972395,0.84425575,0.0031336003,0.0005908503,0.0000070818483,0.00006960053,0.0305104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68591905,0.04738463,0.00026419963,0.0034876324,0.0023293158,0.000035021323,0.0000126652785,0.00005210304,0.2605154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939444,0.0008584299,0.00064824766,0.0003504539,0.00071395375,0.0034845027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975461,0.00026340625,0.0006310958,0.00029016234,0.00089866534,0.00037061414],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037917015,0.00032300124,0.00033498133,0.00019122759,0.00097604934,0.0007901107,0.00065566064,0.00021845655,0.012760132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036152505,0.00027839976,0.00017932522,0.0014145895,0.00048438882,0.0028605934,0.00004529085,0.0051443474,0.0032208527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035073095,0.00061570934,0.001097884,0.000032930606,0.0004912294,0.000008855731,0.027178526,0.000018336796,0.000031711912,0.70673245,0.035823405,0.22793387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064189004,0.0006173311,0.0005193245,0.0003421069,0.00016195522,0.0006300498,0.030786136,0.00006208607,0.000021515232,0.121574074,0.8442175,0.0004260534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008952973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015028706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8407681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002019113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013577689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194067472","doi":"","title":"Cooperative Design Lawyering: How Can Lawyers Prevent Disputes Through Value Innovation?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Business; Scope (computer science); Competitive advantage; Forum shopping; Legal service; Reciprocal; Predictability; Law and economics; Industrial organization; Marketing; Law; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03402401271035346,"score_gpt":0.3450857034767821,"score_spread":0.31106169076642864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194067472","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22914237,0.0009745721,0.08607099,0.59775573,0.0035162685,0.0017499852,0.000009372221,0.0002062733,0.08057442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688813,0.0006261307,0.00092724245,0.0012763757,0.00046453738,0.000017900536,0.000007978107,0.000017862749,0.027780654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973435,0.0004975892,0.00026318966,0.00019394736,0.0004393168,0.0012624663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867356,0.00025370778,0.00028998466,0.000147069,0.00057713565,0.00005852777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032096014,0.00013227372,0.00014401425,0.00012546114,0.00088270556,0.00045696096,0.0003125107,0.00008855171,0.0002759931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080070284,0.000121388504,0.00004751458,0.001372711,0.000107471125,0.0014343034,0.000020385505,0.0019155404,0.000078996345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012371589,0.00007943123,0.00037797415,0.000001906057,0.0000841258,4.1941144e-7,0.009996825,0.00016734753,0.00026586067,0.98581064,0.0016822009,0.0015209251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068923616,0.00043375947,0.00025150258,0.000039936727,0.000052592844,0.00005916888,0.10779988,0.0001007647,0.0009272034,0.41366968,0.47547826,0.00049801625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001564465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028177598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73973894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013274449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014783739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194364949","doi":"","title":"A Conversation About Canadian Legal Education: Lakehead University and Dialogue Pedagogy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Socratic method; Conversation; Legal education; Class (philosophy); Empathy; Legal writing; Pedagogy; Sociology; Law; Tort; Psychology; Legal research; Mathematics education; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Liability","score_opus":0.020441868506605346,"score_gpt":0.31449179749265466,"score_spread":0.2940499289860493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194364949","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13909112,0.0006937577,0.00068464846,0.7756496,0.0007567404,0.0001814223,0.0000070819306,0.000037068803,0.082898565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992276,0.0008552228,0.00003546408,0.0020908322,0.00072356133,6.175303e-7,0.000009673941,0.0000047519493,0.004003869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987958,0.00017991752,0.00010055791,0.00011014704,0.00013750083,0.00067604025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993027,0.00005081999,0.00008904317,0.000043847213,0.00020228456,0.00031134082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007196833,0.000056226225,0.0000629725,0.00010211072,0.00085172406,0.00016620108,0.00013175346,0.000061769155,0.00024599416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037507343,0.000065438595,0.000023996283,0.00038819973,0.00009241287,0.00084031734,0.000007033045,0.0011019529,0.000050000574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010688704,0.000014923003,0.004167947,0.0000014243934,0.00001928738,0.0000011109612,0.014844014,9.831915e-7,0.000006100727,0.9650901,0.0026470225,0.013196398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016098586,0.000038466907,0.0029692112,0.0000027049605,0.000018316878,0.00002464456,0.072938755,0.0000071315376,9.605056e-7,0.008836354,0.91492146,0.0000809889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36009508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9093044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95625377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010495803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06878605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9364931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195000632","doi":"","title":"Caught By Private Law: A Review Of Visitors’ Jurisdiction In Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Appeal; Law; Adjudication; Visitor pattern; Political science; Position (finance); Private law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.01955772057701646,"score_gpt":0.3582580842686784,"score_spread":0.33870036369166195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195000632","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000010164538,0.9775424,0.000022894194,0.016213125,0.0005963157,0.00034997083,0.000019125584,0.000006449863,0.005248695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000072342795,0.9978798,0.000010467379,0.000726705,0.00045388204,0.000019195979,0.00003964532,0.00001880848,0.0007791253],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665904,0.00077300565,0.00087664323,0.00017877684,0.00053071463,0.0009818152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983742,0.00018575577,0.0010451789,0.00012955282,0.00015422022,0.00011109199],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002619469,0.00017637546,0.00077622454,0.00009084493,0.00024190778,0.00005353361,0.00041259977,0.00011260827,0.00017551224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056858314,0.00015865604,0.00016310967,0.0012265556,0.0000457131,0.0003477345,0.000018792718,0.00412803,0.00001485134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022632173,0.000042766755,0.0000072227285,0.0055432725,0.00015913518,0.0000033686983,0.00029239524,5.7060205e-8,1.11391124e-7,0.3380953,0.028477887,0.6273762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050431623,0.000014755768,2.4843965e-7,0.009588992,0.00016318726,0.000031995274,0.000443724,9.280531e-8,1.0141438e-7,0.0019492126,0.9876197,0.00013756723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87069374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96878314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9591418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00814466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14763737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195279425","doi":"10.29173/mlj956","title":"Legal Education in Manitoba: 1913-1950","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03585863411803336,"score_gpt":0.3529999381349887,"score_spread":0.31714130401695534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195279425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4016462,0.000099303405,0.00019908283,0.11046392,0.005198879,0.00020386762,0.0000028613042,0.000051809195,0.48213407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926296,0.0001087501,0.0005155416,0.0022006999,0.0024670912,0.000012297944,0.000001404936,0.000011210472,0.0020534259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985596,0.00029491095,0.00032737837,0.00013736014,0.00037542553,0.0003053077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902505,0.00018744584,0.00019192357,0.00013443951,0.00030836192,0.00015278497],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011345505,0.000089906505,0.00009581652,0.00017266399,0.00093883014,0.00052820286,0.00027061434,0.00008305418,0.0010179093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050352473,0.000069875525,0.000047674377,0.0003792301,0.0001602868,0.00208478,0.000019701507,0.000457048,0.0004975292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014040671,0.00022823892,0.015210786,0.0000023429548,0.000008733759,0.000009194542,0.0014657748,5.719736e-7,0.00015720839,0.79142475,0.023960734,0.16751763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024959838,0.000017173574,0.0135713965,0.00004447423,0.000007350169,0.00005059713,0.040067937,3.3164702e-7,0.00005035284,0.013560619,0.9322564,0.0001237472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17066811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8171581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9082957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005977278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020781164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195583118","doi":"","title":"The Legal Profession in the Digital Age: Empirical Evidence from the DTUWatson Project","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Digital evidence; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Computer science; Digital forensics; Computer security","score_opus":0.25649266556792677,"score_gpt":0.45310726531924533,"score_spread":0.19661459975131856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195583118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43762952,0.003029502,0.00011998966,0.2201735,0.00018268566,0.0013470341,0.00004877879,0.000023098348,0.33744588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6903286,0.0005627169,0.00006576386,0.0001409092,0.00004661528,4.2012954e-7,0.000020230533,0.000004951823,0.3088298],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99311787,0.0045001283,0.0001777193,0.00032066272,0.001434476,0.00044917443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990572,0.0075974893,0.00021248651,0.0007381457,0.000795407,0.0000845003],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005499588,0.000115604016,0.00018988464,0.00006798508,0.0057883197,0.0004027227,0.0025286786,0.00011927392,0.0409145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027689438,0.00007563022,0.00014126593,0.0024107606,0.002003095,0.0014580594,0.00078821037,0.0010077374,0.006118015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028046302,0.00012549944,0.00009744709,0.000008779762,0.00004583391,0.00009679184,0.08571792,0.000004009816,0.00026415373,0.0018730053,0.9073672,0.0041188844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022403814,0.000038190217,0.014636537,0.000058563997,0.000023195893,0.0000018820457,0.26869375,0.000025404106,0.0000892315,0.00003331975,0.7161081,0.000067781504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031022668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062216204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25269908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033937074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036381958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196175286","doi":"","title":"LAWYERS’ MONOPOLY? THINK AGAIN::","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Statute; Legal profession; Law; Practice of law; Legal ethics; Privilege (computing); Public interest; Duty; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.08242331306526648,"score_gpt":0.3999953027688611,"score_spread":0.31757198970359457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196175286","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010808887,0.006378292,0.0000021438318,0.51050174,0.00039611684,0.00021961593,0.0000033083352,0.000018134275,0.48237255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5371313,0.027358023,0.00028418037,0.37374538,0.0021904223,0.000049149672,0.000015539417,0.00002220913,0.05920377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991332,0.00026468292,0.00012933507,0.00009073543,0.00015224442,0.00022980163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991358,0.00008765012,0.00006330785,0.00027306846,0.000207285,0.00023291587],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015232615,0.000052610725,0.000079850084,0.000035605266,0.0014926398,0.00013751826,0.00033605896,0.00003756966,0.0076979916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011524465,0.000038657112,0.000033864657,0.00056043203,0.00031279566,0.00022752793,0.000007648224,0.00018509952,0.0039211246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.7389833e-7,0.0000024009112,0.000028074983,0.000014050491,0.0000052225223,4.6406103e-7,0.005120329,9.845805e-9,3.3640174e-7,0.5195611,0.4612455,0.014022298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000148919735,0.000004380292,0.00018589922,0.000107738175,0.000016206002,0.0000010289491,0.00052890397,7.0837723e-7,0.0000011434543,0.0019200423,0.9971621,0.000056961548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60218143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90497434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53702325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021705595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031031717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196891202","doi":"","title":"WHERE ARE WE GOING? THE PAST AND FUTURE OF CANADIAN SCHOLARSHIP ON LEGAL ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT LAWYERS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Order (exchange); Strengths and weaknesses; Political science; Legal ethics; Work (physics); Legal profession; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Engineering; Business; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12446722641475487,"score_gpt":0.38671459773525396,"score_spread":0.2622473713204991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196891202","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017091862,0.04153325,3.170467e-7,0.90205723,0.00032752144,0.00037673253,0.000105832834,0.0000031843267,0.055425014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20274049,0.4869434,0.00021734631,0.2892063,0.001864658,0.00015039893,0.00002803866,0.00003670763,0.018812688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878263,0.00045321384,0.00015039774,0.000114312614,0.00027833672,0.0002211047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986833,0.00041328848,0.000114228525,0.0002494255,0.00025365874,0.00028614266],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021422626,0.000070335045,0.0001153171,0.000032760025,0.0014005211,0.00018976678,0.00023106244,0.00008444635,0.00048109208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012765422,0.00004753872,0.000046331254,0.0006202768,0.0001446784,0.00015068261,0.000007280885,0.00057526503,0.000019556845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010695856,0.000004483634,0.0003462205,0.00030297623,0.000017901812,0.0000022425954,0.0037604938,2.7672093e-7,4.6563702e-7,0.8110251,0.17355242,0.010986386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035048648,0.0000060675034,0.00083591434,0.00059522304,0.000038384664,0.0000024642018,0.0050444272,2.9121335e-7,0.0000014757466,0.0003325511,0.9930475,0.000060676306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68050724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8194951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045379737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006974283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W319910510","doi":"","title":"Dean Penelope Andrews: Advocacy, Leadership, Vision","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Practice of law; Sociology; Political science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.17006499534824487,"score_gpt":0.4476186952387733,"score_spread":0.2775536998905284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W319910510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005969769,0.102040626,0.00003457212,0.18917632,0.0010468307,0.00050675153,0.0000015193493,0.000090793255,0.7065056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87783784,0.052643813,0.0008874171,0.05982406,0.0010470418,0.00005714761,0.00002632033,0.000019667692,0.0076566627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861306,0.00038322154,0.00026261987,0.00012669856,0.00027907832,0.00033530264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909735,0.00022208369,0.00013999897,0.00022201923,0.00013975964,0.00017880976],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00203671,0.000087764645,0.00015643142,0.000024467936,0.0005138475,0.00009994212,0.00020309666,0.000058522895,0.004444187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000841883,0.00007721081,0.0000662475,0.0005529904,0.00014318747,0.0015552159,0.000022432734,0.00021987066,0.0021598986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013234355,0.00011215622,0.000533753,0.00025757207,0.0000097381535,3.2570824e-7,0.003557875,2.1976783e-8,0.0000073971382,0.809652,0.15148042,0.03438745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046789773,0.0000079590645,0.00050239585,0.0004593324,0.000035346224,0.000002200618,0.00082606875,1.3390242e-7,0.0000110263345,0.00024359208,0.99775326,0.000111897425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030688369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010280325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8772409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061086204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033412818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200672922","doi":"10.29173/assert13","title":"Q &amp; A with Thomas Misco on “Practice requires rationale: Lessons from global contexts to ensure controversial issue education”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Social Studies Education Research for Teachers","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4419369988653726,"score_gpt":0.6192196960597562,"score_spread":0.17728269719438366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200672922","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027796134,0.0007270544,0.000066242785,0.90301615,0.0006690994,0.0014593728,0.00019868868,0.000041424806,0.06602584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9253636,0.00042322947,0.0034873935,0.050597504,0.005025372,0.0010113543,0.0002210662,0.00003049522,0.01384001],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964879,0.0010134745,0.0003884378,0.00043694008,0.0012236225,0.00044962583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896724,0.0031356623,0.00033123736,0.0001857436,0.0063424474,0.00033249796],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023728057,0.00016717977,0.00029545277,0.00012534054,0.0020995373,0.00026591454,0.0004158665,0.00012733196,0.0002572573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03582319,0.00016466367,0.00009824973,0.0014402163,0.0006736876,0.00077208737,0.00005279914,0.0004303133,0.00010904337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043971968,0.0005368966,0.00018014188,0.000015712369,0.00021904378,9.8337374e-8,0.16963227,0.0000031917639,0.000036996258,0.18603796,0.6292047,0.013693291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022438112,0.00016223756,0.0009953427,0.000032044834,0.000028977684,1.0257197e-7,0.3136819,2.7803017e-7,0.000031394084,0.0023490048,0.6823761,0.000118273456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008973239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035434528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89756745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037516686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008596319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201831831","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Ontario Legislative Research: Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8246744847002508,"score_gpt":0.6635258412885947,"score_spread":0.16114864341165613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201831831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000109335604,0.0006448272,0.0000043047685,0.17768024,0.0027592909,0.0014447782,0.000038804847,0.00012558767,0.81719285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032377425,0.0008678907,0.0013351159,0.00060235884,0.007338719,0.00032814225,0.00027436984,0.00008126043,0.9859344],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9630718,0.018626751,0.00092784414,0.001189766,0.013422513,0.0027612816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9371845,0.017357564,0.00021885999,0.0015059971,0.042814344,0.00091869844],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16008942,0.00030134097,0.000483982,0.0043376363,0.0066718585,0.00334938,0.0029282328,0.0013558631,0.03150818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06875651,0.00028324156,0.00012521302,0.010961599,0.005640051,0.002088895,0.0008991447,0.019180318,0.012762664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020809868,0.0001320839,0.00005249125,0.000014828052,0.000035354726,0.000010959204,0.11499304,3.3341902e-7,0.0000012126419,0.24918418,0.6345134,0.0010413431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013231486,0.00013903667,0.00004861769,0.00013137488,0.0000061214682,0.0000012124273,0.13389872,9.525255e-7,0.000005452414,0.06462112,0.8007607,0.00025439242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9550699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94665414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18456307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009168745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12582155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201920784","doi":"","title":"Rules, Rationality, and the Significance of Standpoint","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02607782510128088,"score_gpt":0.35231795428373686,"score_spread":0.326240129182456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201920784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014157585,0.00015296199,0.0012202513,0.57507366,0.00034621597,0.00019099886,0.0000063347698,0.000013224718,0.40883875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541026,0.00013011169,0.0008126045,0.002392271,0.00030691831,0.0000016840019,9.160354e-7,0.0000015173727,0.00094374054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907243,0.00030986965,0.00020216621,0.000048673206,0.0002784554,0.00008841923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913037,0.00029467355,0.00019257165,0.00006200832,0.00026722616,0.00005313091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001877529,0.000035482914,0.00007145458,0.000020343668,0.00082701875,0.00021090134,0.00010617934,0.000026260432,0.0003227609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043988612,0.000023885243,0.000027748683,0.0001344271,0.00038063328,0.0004432894,0.000004842445,0.0002735984,0.000004640875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024028976,0.000025512523,0.00007853592,8.356321e-7,0.00000565718,4.241787e-7,0.0039086305,0.000002660448,0.00001688991,0.9912049,0.00313076,0.0016011673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044578518,0.000023681014,0.0031082104,0.000009653366,0.000012317107,0.0000073704714,0.004043109,0.0000049735595,0.00006480432,0.38541555,0.60681355,0.00005097402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00382026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060999475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035249268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003993119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6360843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203634645","doi":"10.29173/mlj834","title":"Enhancing Access to Justice: Some Recent Progress in Manitoba","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.07448201269098415,"score_gpt":0.3991401640607854,"score_spread":0.32465815136980125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203634645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64005804,0.00026617403,0.00013113958,0.27608806,0.005976855,0.0009107539,0.0000019050033,0.00008440006,0.07648267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98669857,0.00017293272,0.0013725001,0.008775025,0.002680729,0.00008786441,0.0000020071259,0.00001692051,0.00019343487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981908,0.00026636047,0.00041916672,0.00016842228,0.0004951216,0.00046009212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867535,0.0001509007,0.00019809978,0.00014074756,0.0005516132,0.00028331327],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011685982,0.00011032119,0.00012847438,0.00020232548,0.0013031081,0.002557209,0.00053490174,0.000081770326,0.0017284201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005060697,0.000105863386,0.00003343512,0.00076972175,0.000102674814,0.003896146,0.00007296398,0.00076052424,0.0009789768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052146603,0.00096225,0.0392351,0.000069690555,0.00006433547,0.00008063933,0.030097373,0.000037764756,0.0003387583,0.42695102,0.12288952,0.37922138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002833322,0.000040248324,0.033676736,0.00008006954,0.000026603795,0.000025202928,0.116369374,0.0000057998236,0.00029844063,0.012441283,0.83648616,0.00026676513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051717903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5527507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71359664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049301196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004829936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204210210","doi":"","title":"University Boards as Public Decision-Makers: Clarifying Representative Governance, Obligations, and Enforcement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Fredericton","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Statutory law; Enforcement; Shareholder; Stakeholder; Business; Government (linguistics); Harm; Public administration; Power (physics); Political science; Public relations; Corporate law; Institution; Law","score_opus":0.01587481139834527,"score_gpt":0.33019216922235195,"score_spread":0.31431735782400666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204210210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53451025,0.00095806294,0.0035815355,0.08950393,0.0010544723,0.0004614548,0.0000054178286,0.000059365706,0.36986554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97179866,0.005594504,0.00029248826,0.0003940439,0.00014286797,9.776711e-7,0.000002966889,0.0000059402023,0.02176753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982088,0.00020441796,0.00017009435,0.00016711585,0.00044205203,0.0008075115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989007,0.0003352393,0.00024239991,0.0001190687,0.00029028903,0.000112279326],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022862407,0.00007427386,0.000089230365,0.00011304615,0.00096063147,0.00032319923,0.0002132689,0.00007465712,0.001168656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095655135,0.000076407094,0.000043863434,0.00064073375,0.00009537134,0.0018859489,0.000038171394,0.001520918,0.00013232812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023122167,0.000027722543,0.005862131,8.5863485e-7,0.000049130133,8.776035e-7,0.0031731091,0.0000046698515,0.000009220639,0.975979,0.0014591601,0.013411019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046411072,0.000069960566,0.0015685591,0.000013429867,0.000016383747,0.00002630375,0.10934007,0.000017480075,0.000004477438,0.21530627,0.673061,0.000111938934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038627516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004898194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76067275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014235711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009486197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204601795","doi":"10.52497/revue-cmh.321","title":"L’approche transsystémique et l’enseignement du droit en école de commerce","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"La Revue du Centre Michel de L Hospital","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007182418025695168,"score_gpt":0.2615773172686993,"score_spread":0.2543948992430041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204601795","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4025032,0.00068947085,0.0013143539,0.4797541,0.0020191425,0.0006389009,0.000060720224,0.00006902777,0.11295109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9191514,0.0006573886,0.0028329478,0.008975104,0.00087004487,0.00003516136,0.000069439295,0.000042123997,0.06736635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972951,0.0010078154,0.0004040569,0.00038569706,0.00024818146,0.0006591969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982325,0.0007306928,0.00023809008,0.0003034008,0.00023622175,0.0002591311],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016886034,0.00024707234,0.0002671871,0.0000676665,0.00026107326,0.00030661406,0.00042990962,0.0003981186,0.002880389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004855245,0.0003046725,0.00017601579,0.0005848164,0.00017983007,0.000748316,0.00005158453,0.00086353155,0.0008839987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022907247,0.0013406286,0.034848448,0.00023564852,0.000118806645,0.000031109303,0.27734366,0.00010254681,0.00024135654,0.6022173,0.07767609,0.0058214716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065775996,0.00009100157,0.025670236,0.00017796135,0.0001062308,0.000035211415,0.044922017,0.00071828184,0.00009986747,0.002012327,0.9250923,0.0004167998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006313762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012395633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8474162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007902793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011319423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206221509","doi":"","title":"Serious Play: Creativity and the Transsystemic Classroom","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Sensibility; Embodied cognition; Legal education; Pedagogy; Legal writing; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Political science; Legal research; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015049603831012963,"score_gpt":0.33147541699932676,"score_spread":0.3164258131683138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206221509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5610262,0.0021289263,0.0063276044,0.29025757,0.0011556377,0.0004298959,0.000002345406,0.00006723203,0.13860455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99001735,0.0018467045,0.000029415954,0.00058754487,0.0009838954,0.0000057481657,4.164604e-7,0.0000057978023,0.0065231207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982053,0.0005335142,0.00016016286,0.00009005963,0.00021481479,0.0007961734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992722,0.0002910617,0.00012947341,0.00008395268,0.00016784281,0.000055449193],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053537535,0.00006134081,0.00008941051,0.00004486026,0.0015328077,0.0002419717,0.00016992186,0.000060019785,0.0001286511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049992104,0.0000412104,0.000036739857,0.00029316705,0.00050630124,0.00046086186,0.0000073061974,0.0015565875,0.00004069682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055457236,0.000017492252,0.0007773143,8.490778e-7,0.00004225487,1.8478865e-7,0.018639127,1.5516224e-7,0.000025440791,0.96832585,0.00055593246,0.011559952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013049507,0.00013234977,0.0010089118,0.00001298217,0.000056401037,0.00023429118,0.062380765,0.000024601411,0.000016442458,0.42361584,0.5110733,0.00013915595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003130487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033603605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003423074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005131347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207358157","doi":"","title":"BIASED IMPARTIALITY: A SURVEY OF POST-RDS CASELAW ON BIAS, RACE AND INDIGENEITY","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Jurisprudence; Judicial opinion; Political science; Sociology; Adjudication; Race (biology); Gender studies","score_opus":0.19485387012084068,"score_gpt":0.42243951402520047,"score_spread":0.22758564390435979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207358157","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23395823,0.037470575,0.000001434125,0.68773574,0.00046746532,0.0007664392,0.00041555526,0.000018062154,0.039166532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960098,0.013566009,0.00001721816,0.025043959,0.000051954947,0.0000104843375,0.00006372816,0.0000058831038,0.0011427514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783456,0.0015019667,0.00020628158,0.000113248665,0.00017374479,0.00017019619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982942,0.000591583,0.00012235768,0.00025938475,0.0005130493,0.00021942603],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004002471,0.00005847914,0.00016432341,0.00003783273,0.0005556869,0.00008966905,0.00012856057,0.000041757474,0.0012456144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008811098,0.00004619397,0.00003030712,0.00084973505,0.00014706957,0.00011703185,0.000009745516,0.00017580503,0.000059092265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024147015,0.00021922386,0.04979199,0.0011130999,0.00020886004,0.00005617225,0.0322576,0.0000021000974,0.0000461267,0.5657709,0.22147666,0.1290331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041777654,0.000009889912,0.06545233,0.00018755316,0.000030003775,0.000003778132,0.00032750567,5.4984787e-7,0.00002276514,0.00007250181,0.9337848,0.0000665501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9046206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9873974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7261398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001288686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076035447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207827546","doi":"","title":"L’ABC de l’évaluation en droit: leçons de l’école primaire pour l’éducation juridique (The ABCs of Legal Pedagogy: Lessons from Primary School for Legal Education)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Grading (engineering); Legal education; Futures contract; Valuation (finance); Pedagogy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Business; Engineering; Accounting","score_opus":0.02730448999606439,"score_gpt":0.3868242388579587,"score_spread":0.3595197488618943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207827546","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23692665,0.0036864877,0.061204106,0.68390954,0.002647762,0.00075096224,0.000059693415,0.000035103927,0.010779738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87499684,0.006242473,0.003225785,0.0027657782,0.005313747,0.00019711716,0.000047992347,0.0000568566,0.10715342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945503,0.0016477394,0.0008428801,0.0003765577,0.0006021351,0.001980414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995204,0.0018801083,0.001090852,0.00038647198,0.0011696004,0.0002689995],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009732983,0.00027759577,0.00030821844,0.00023039493,0.0013738874,0.00033575212,0.0007428221,0.00034435696,0.00069753214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004116088,0.00023364632,0.00028031974,0.00073220435,0.000369994,0.0026378508,0.000039895178,0.002373448,0.00011202119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007435557,0.0006701894,0.0018088613,0.00002155477,0.00021007875,2.6745073e-7,0.005498464,0.000025458774,0.0034575197,0.8467409,0.009893547,0.1315988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008334197,0.00018502685,0.017192844,0.00018955074,0.00040671608,0.0001619244,0.022485388,0.000061399885,0.0005785368,0.5572216,0.40035337,0.00033021157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012092501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015741648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6811437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010485326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29672816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208484215","doi":"","title":"A Better Act, More Bad Behaviour Online: Nova Scotia’s New Intimate Images and Cyber-protection Act Goes to Court","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Law; Computer security; Political science; Business; Computer science; Engineering; Geology; Aeronautics; Oceanography","score_opus":0.039144715132699716,"score_gpt":0.3442461015448713,"score_spread":0.30510138641217155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208484215","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4887735,0.000048838076,0.00029656326,0.5005956,0.00059475884,0.0004626835,0.000039818013,0.00016512402,0.009023066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607537,0.000022701115,0.0064313416,0.028381124,0.0014584698,0.000015713007,0.00003235228,0.000027337275,0.0028772904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852043,0.00013070177,0.00028159222,0.00036940354,0.00037869273,0.0003191634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884444,0.00008336408,0.00013904303,0.00020028744,0.00021638807,0.00051650224],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003522616,0.00016801963,0.00017953907,0.000075729135,0.0004540223,0.00068633095,0.0002510588,0.00012587008,0.0020088095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00104172,0.00016931293,0.00005319331,0.0007102434,0.00014162571,0.0014719898,0.000079983845,0.0006182155,0.00075046305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022851881,0.00059861934,0.10636578,0.00008916722,0.00016990508,0.00003526576,0.05534443,0.00005424496,0.017426115,0.029023074,0.7414019,0.049262952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005023303,0.000105669664,0.08783744,0.000053037995,0.00006877306,0.0000056110766,0.004919767,0.000024050243,0.0017843676,0.0005308527,0.9037193,0.0004487777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07842024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025727274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47221452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097652635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058050524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208769353","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3842024","title":"Placing TWAIL Scholarship and Praxis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Scholarship; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.026849827819970074,"score_gpt":0.3519236650902188,"score_spread":0.3250738372702487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208769353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6761927,0.0012223208,0.003776555,0.27219334,0.00062313344,0.00012347476,0.0000011457257,0.00006281853,0.045804497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98406523,0.0026779994,0.0001101684,0.00037288736,0.00043466678,0.000002213555,1.7512836e-7,0.000005882019,0.012330751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984641,0.00019096915,0.00013128833,0.000091970694,0.00020854721,0.0009131149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993797,0.00022566058,0.00010664995,0.00006173337,0.00013982654,0.0000864084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037806015,0.000050521252,0.000052654723,0.00007922843,0.0007866045,0.00019944522,0.00012161887,0.00005060096,0.00021183919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017699011,0.000035931345,0.000021319594,0.0002191113,0.00009158483,0.0013202273,0.000010712525,0.0011111196,0.00006869065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008892524,0.00001597455,0.011387729,5.451175e-7,0.000019881663,3.5456657e-7,0.0018601059,4.932245e-8,0.00030808063,0.9166505,0.00028105525,0.06946688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038479405,0.0000663173,0.0039680465,0.000022320888,0.0000142179015,0.000096858224,0.011629301,3.2447e-7,0.000053182866,0.5279084,0.45572838,0.0001278595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004980159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006299523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45544732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005649621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005885002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208972934","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3915077","title":"Black Lives Matter: On Challenging the Soul of Legal Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; York University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Legal education; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01699605488275189,"score_gpt":0.34077244352173003,"score_spread":0.3237763886389781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208972934","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25535095,0.0023134407,0.0006605853,0.40833208,0.0013687497,0.00013725128,0.000001085264,0.000019518768,0.33181632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756726,0.0028556231,0.000031743624,0.0012303469,0.0006391416,0.0000030509964,0.0000017973882,0.000006442824,0.01955924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864686,0.00026385117,0.00017865408,0.000085385596,0.0002541685,0.0005710582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922097,0.00016517719,0.00017517223,0.00011734874,0.0002854001,0.000035958023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001534687,0.000054034856,0.000064634,0.000063872525,0.00058651913,0.00014723433,0.00017875797,0.000031334243,0.00047927137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038894694,0.000042846754,0.000055625984,0.0003602427,0.00009669928,0.00037737648,0.000010131783,0.0013491509,0.00010840265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051149486,0.00013099241,0.0003823226,0.0000021550422,0.000032616226,2.3639545e-7,0.008991778,0.000015145323,0.000067382054,0.9796257,0.002092998,0.008653551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015361793,0.0000665129,0.0016578181,0.000038761333,0.000034701134,0.00008369742,0.384491,0.000009233398,0.00022455413,0.15171163,0.46140003,0.0001284608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071721687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024237281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82791406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000344072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0155263245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9900547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209019375","doi":"10.11575/prism/38766","title":"Professional ethics and law for Canadian teachers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal ethics; Professional ethics; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0492872218834372,"score_gpt":0.32619435457746593,"score_spread":0.2769071326940287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209019375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000077298144,0.00005256987,0.0011133158,0.049852267,0.0005151307,0.00033060974,0.0000055239593,0.000017377375,0.9480359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002993108,0.000048118247,0.009748951,0.0011722051,0.00010534088,5.929809e-7,0.00007608621,0.000008261317,0.9885411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992669,0.00013947113,0.00007137387,0.00015224969,0.00021465118,0.00015535977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987484,0.0004908707,0.00015143136,0.00009948346,0.00032016335,0.00018963729],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009807802,0.00007209077,0.00011881975,0.00012833498,0.0017095436,0.000028549377,0.0002013221,0.00052418513,0.00071402226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038721183,0.00009430306,0.000044700108,0.00006609375,0.0007843923,0.00028411933,0.00002815094,0.00078634755,0.000023746248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061998726,0.000009751784,0.000013058456,0.000021115,0.00002318608,8.5401376e-7,0.05621455,1.6462293e-9,4.996005e-7,0.5487869,0.38872522,0.006198665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011676446,0.000016010199,0.00010060805,0.000039004834,0.000042623604,2.0722476e-7,0.0018720491,0.000012348712,3.0324168e-7,0.01723346,0.98046243,0.00010419508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42452633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44773778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5917372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028011017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010684605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212243182","doi":"10.22215/etd/2018-12988","title":"Liberating Legal Education: Using Critical Feminist Pedagogy to Educate on the Problems of Oppression and Gender-Based Violence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Algonquin College","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Privilege (computing); Racism; Intersectionality; Sociology; Legislature; Feminist legal theory; Gender studies; Inequality; Critical pedagogy; Economic Justice; Political science; Legal education; Criminology; Pedagogy; Law; Feminism; Politics","score_opus":0.1282451071658718,"score_gpt":0.49765088965594695,"score_spread":0.36940578249007516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212243182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36800534,0.00018216438,0.00020234786,0.040764283,0.0047982093,0.0010538895,0.000014606003,0.000055210116,0.5849239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97917867,0.000023026934,0.0055106934,0.0038242033,0.00096268964,0.00011440316,0.00006462854,0.000025522466,0.010296175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982988,0.00029024694,0.00040110733,0.00033383365,0.0004476416,0.00022833586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976216,0.00089803356,0.00026328154,0.0002521524,0.00082197826,0.00014292897],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088574993,0.00016985914,0.00016781453,0.00016990576,0.0012065743,0.00044820082,0.00026034322,0.00019075438,0.0016188731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003258362,0.00013308902,0.000042135296,0.0004991753,0.0002238094,0.00028722687,0.000017039196,0.00039988648,0.00002523768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008154739,0.0008319864,0.0003034224,0.00042359947,0.000025462738,3.465302e-7,0.09461872,0.00001533204,0.0019692814,0.85335094,0.022724915,0.025654454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021685298,0.0003469666,0.0017784783,0.0037650312,0.00022003084,0.000005928615,0.345553,0.00038154496,0.0072662123,0.015113456,0.6242846,0.0010678633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052802907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019059726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83823746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008141281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008372113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213281781","doi":"10.29173/mlj934","title":"The Next Great Transition in Canadian Legal Education","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Legal education; Political science; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03884332331072572,"score_gpt":0.3317381772510305,"score_spread":0.2928948539403048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213281781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12893215,0.000113502414,0.00006963248,0.5697922,0.0030310568,0.00014986352,0.0000028261761,0.000014742039,0.297894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955609,0.00014470634,0.000046052446,0.002342139,0.0010450949,0.000008915817,0.0000010254471,0.0000046630416,0.0008464933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907523,0.00023078197,0.00016947537,0.00006487414,0.0001888573,0.00027075858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931943,0.00014965344,0.000069097114,0.00007600538,0.00019548266,0.00019033124],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011104987,0.000046215184,0.00003894843,0.000090882975,0.0020641992,0.0007411138,0.00016212356,0.00004676562,0.00044728577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027395488,0.00002907144,0.000025864805,0.00025736078,0.00012676498,0.0015270982,0.0000024995954,0.00026583552,0.00011978408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068875943,0.000028142074,0.0011267863,5.9648835e-7,0.000004518284,0.000003475216,0.0031922378,7.8526466e-7,0.000033897057,0.7787005,0.011840098,0.20506214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088799294,0.000007362898,0.0039091595,0.00001722449,0.0000032520604,0.000025348467,0.029997233,0.0000010639881,0.000008858075,0.009058607,0.956832,0.000051107232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9603355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9449919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070720015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034245562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32134077","doi":"10.29173/alr38","title":"Legal Education Reform and the Good Lawyer","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Doctrine; Legal doctrine; Law; Emphasis (telecommunications); Function (biology); Legal ethics; Legal profession; Identity (music); Political science; Legal practice; Practice of law; Legal writing; Legal research; Legal realism; Professional responsibility; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019731733776526733,"score_gpt":0.3606139686203767,"score_spread":0.34088223484384994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32134077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012913787,0.0052770255,0.000003491745,0.29277655,0.0002796667,0.00022103789,1.489615e-7,0.000007945676,0.701305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7546475,0.028952206,0.00022068131,0.14452891,0.00075281394,0.0001904437,0.000015907372,0.00001259969,0.07067895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914104,0.00034103182,0.00017309547,0.00010319443,0.00013528239,0.00010633159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990046,0.000515527,0.00010812448,0.00020305252,0.00011577743,0.00005291468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014684292,0.00005485498,0.00011392984,0.000009610702,0.0005213517,0.00015141902,0.00013893734,0.00002995269,0.0004850647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012397671,0.00003390377,0.000033709042,0.0002500025,0.00024962917,0.0005436655,0.000015989861,0.00014018195,0.0002266159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001076698,0.000017762799,0.000018837087,0.000051886298,0.000004104726,6.253646e-9,0.0008100214,3.990797e-9,1.883036e-7,0.9717886,0.009226214,0.018081283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008076178,0.00000383523,0.0000594126,0.00015984887,0.000035987578,0.0000022134504,0.00023975389,0.00000100762,8.227524e-7,0.004053163,0.99531037,0.000052825755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2038378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056802668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98608416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043984026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033746558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9604082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214191075","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Statutory Compilation Table","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Table (database); Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.38930601372837187,"score_gpt":0.5595117266839229,"score_spread":0.17020571295555104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214191075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000112735244,0.00021050408,0.000007308981,0.15717377,0.00465419,0.0006917175,0.0002610665,0.00009772127,0.836791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011648477,0.0005750512,0.0014557273,0.0024276383,0.0062186713,0.00013939406,0.0012203406,0.00006030193,0.9762544],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917302,0.0026215187,0.00055450003,0.00057993305,0.0029168779,0.0015969793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98772514,0.0031682106,0.000155809,0.00074351486,0.007358189,0.0008491632],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025598474,0.00019005834,0.0002446092,0.0026953444,0.006256757,0.0027682271,0.0012356585,0.0011098018,0.027423948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014973282,0.00019922685,0.00005844896,0.0044357423,0.0015622593,0.0018592298,0.00011108976,0.008465591,0.002803796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002582631,0.000028056933,0.000046854075,0.000012251858,0.000010465341,0.0000044429275,0.0033507545,7.527531e-7,0.0000069163543,0.3294,0.6660555,0.0010814238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006402401,0.00002456939,0.00017574236,0.00004141318,0.0000059532313,0.0000010824896,0.019239329,0.0000071405825,0.000011563107,0.0044020545,0.9758012,0.00022591128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98682535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99017656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32499796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019372904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08457138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214750994","doi":"","title":"Does Judicial Courage Exist, and if so, is it Necessary in a Democracy?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Democracy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.12460071517531475,"score_gpt":0.40421145238675316,"score_spread":0.2796107372114384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214750994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428234,0.000018519784,0.000056347173,0.042560674,0.0006427598,0.00021934038,0.000016698368,0.00007064834,0.013591578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97181255,0.000112554706,0.00004874623,0.004424912,0.00043997253,0.0000010588328,0.0000067023275,0.000015685422,0.023137832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811214,0.00042993386,0.00023773983,0.00042138575,0.00038128416,0.00041748496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878734,0.0002441479,0.00019113065,0.00026700602,0.0002877233,0.00022265958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008551501,0.00017339493,0.00019408409,0.0004669765,0.0012097813,0.00072125753,0.000487522,0.00020906405,0.0004052706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002826526,0.00016534698,0.000046148623,0.001096448,0.00067559734,0.003914788,0.00015752656,0.00062383706,0.00025769204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055881836,0.00009382233,0.9710319,0.000011037972,0.000018926392,0.000047141548,0.025182016,1.7788722e-7,0.00005676659,0.0026007593,0.000062253246,0.00083930796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005694089,0.000052730567,0.7432798,0.00007825168,0.000034718225,0.0000041533044,0.014418496,2.108734e-7,0.00016517793,0.002360182,0.23874159,0.00029527745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066566485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0605842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23867933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021306997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006992711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9565577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215841643","doi":"10.29173/mlj863","title":"The State of Experiential Education in Canadian Law Schools","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; State (computer science); Legal education; Experiential education; Political science; Law; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.019080480932503554,"score_gpt":0.33641742050926526,"score_spread":0.31733693957676173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215841643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6420378,0.000105777144,0.000009247009,0.04445504,0.0024421536,0.0002340703,0.0000017434696,0.000006635744,0.3107075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976425,0.000038336428,0.00016230461,0.0011945924,0.0003657684,0.000017286236,0.0000012368185,0.0000040850687,0.00057388283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908364,0.00019087298,0.00023141157,0.000052459443,0.0002033256,0.00023831912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913126,0.00007489873,0.00013357095,0.00008690859,0.0003874836,0.0001858863],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077572465,0.00004100021,0.00004734497,0.00006797384,0.0013471204,0.0006962171,0.00020156054,0.000027561193,0.00052429514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023411335,0.000032887245,0.000021964794,0.00023964299,0.00015256801,0.0009989599,0.0000071152876,0.00038861777,0.00011115925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034223235,0.00005967161,0.0028428962,0.0000012763467,0.00000778504,7.067047e-7,0.0101414025,0.0000048409006,0.000045170153,0.89826214,0.0153642045,0.07326648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059637347,0.0000071672284,0.00370021,0.000008997329,0.0000019355969,0.0000039279275,0.0956051,0.0000024160267,0.00004805237,0.024426935,0.87609005,0.000045561683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99477357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8738352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028393624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035912315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216130494","doi":"10.29173/mlj1023","title":"(Where is) the Tipping Point for Governmental Regulation of Canadian Lawyers? Perhaps it is in Paradise: Critically Assessing Regulation of Lawyer Involvement with Money Laundering After Canada (Attorney General) v Federation of Law Societies of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Money laundering; Paradise; Tipping point (physics); Law; Point (geometry); Political science; Russian federation; Business; History; Economic policy; Engineering","score_opus":0.03370803705853518,"score_gpt":0.28967440200453143,"score_spread":0.2559663649459962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216130494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9084398,0.00007470984,0.00028833907,0.067204915,0.00044307526,0.00042030853,0.00007136594,0.0000027679748,0.023054723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956712,0.0000097284355,0.0011736879,0.0028354323,0.00018820353,0.000009534978,0.0000065011186,0.0000093946255,0.000096276926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835265,0.00012344647,0.00052579213,0.00010859208,0.0006774941,0.00021205412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983602,0.00013217468,0.0004510504,0.00011356562,0.0008553817,0.000087582215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074617413,0.000090516325,0.00015753809,0.00005729481,0.0007313847,0.00012248858,0.000120876495,0.00005428799,0.00022182637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008317402,0.00007863899,0.000036256777,0.00024801728,0.00027387103,0.0006614177,0.000011870366,0.00015114163,6.5018305e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032624288,0.00020854965,0.020234868,0.00049908663,0.0003227243,0.0000035464307,0.0926671,0.00075885723,0.01071005,0.8058906,0.06756263,0.00081572816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014637602,0.00021928617,0.0961664,0.0010815107,0.00017200081,0.00001513579,0.7151238,0.0023876114,0.027488159,0.006754667,0.14859687,0.00053081434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99875426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7991359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015432409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004485015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7956224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217669021","doi":"","title":"Copyright User Rights and Access to Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Yearbook; Economic Justice; Human rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.02967801057520295,"score_gpt":0.4065770989210985,"score_spread":0.3768990883458955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217669021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41366097,0.00044151364,0.011128885,0.24672556,0.0035107543,0.00037651285,0.0000023823325,0.00009216448,0.32406124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743051,0.0002528386,0.0002699418,0.0024126074,0.0020408654,0.000003683967,5.714673e-7,0.0000060920515,0.020708293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841976,0.00012869593,0.00014157745,0.00011684744,0.00022979006,0.00096331874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992344,0.00010751624,0.00008790502,0.000080085105,0.00034477536,0.00014535272],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001745179,0.000062033985,0.00006432467,0.000112005124,0.0016021569,0.0005675117,0.00027502576,0.000049440263,0.00063115807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003972077,0.00005223351,0.00001747093,0.0005049882,0.00012925937,0.001263006,0.000025169213,0.0009524139,0.00021084734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017918352,0.000029121911,0.00050516607,9.480715e-7,0.000023445775,4.3974964e-7,0.00489566,2.4454684e-7,0.000030424104,0.96783286,0.023538314,0.003125471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011112116,0.00007080379,0.000692401,0.000004580528,0.000029760353,0.000025649666,0.00341816,0.0000020213179,0.000040773677,0.19063109,0.8048923,0.00008136064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028265447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04078457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78135395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003755168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003927583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32535063","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1198","title":"Teaching Cultural Competency in Legal Clinics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05182770238714918,"score_gpt":0.45440144001984967,"score_spread":0.4025737376327005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32535063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29665393,0.000020508729,0.000025441346,0.21198423,0.0004391197,0.000035948546,9.964723e-7,0.000007157549,0.4908327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877951,0.000027487224,0.00030704623,0.007138878,0.0038901484,3.3700906e-7,4.4581327e-7,0.0000028840695,0.00083765015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900883,0.00035444638,0.00029009266,0.000042058302,0.00017617778,0.00012841645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938416,0.00015285962,0.00024030381,0.000024332881,0.00014096452,0.00005740021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015889233,0.000041936928,0.000121145466,0.000079232464,0.0005957478,0.00017667265,0.000096322394,0.00006436954,0.000017391321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070316857,0.00003625057,0.000046578647,0.00012996291,0.00016168253,0.00082658586,0.000007651551,0.00050460914,0.0000032929854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004869625,0.000037280606,0.0003569468,0.000002267225,0.0000042199363,5.2845087e-7,0.046335228,2.3518584e-7,0.000017749491,0.94668025,0.00076886977,0.0057915654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024845471,0.000029978017,0.002984566,0.00000707868,0.000006094196,0.000004576347,0.009644722,0.000003952121,0.0000012088801,0.026454201,0.9605626,0.000052578867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03156431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003938274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95979375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006666026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005890664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97488457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W328176430","doi":"10.1353/ils.2014.0006","title":"The Accidental Law Librarian by Anthony Aycock","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accidental; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.006504061937205967,"score_gpt":0.25178659861423647,"score_spread":0.2452825366770305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W328176430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04665732,0.00020861722,0.00032649547,0.20506875,0.0018982172,0.00011319606,0.000011163506,0.000017264005,0.745699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894975,0.0000642845,0.0003472537,0.009041781,0.00012948549,5.673672e-7,0.000002781403,0.0000016939784,0.0009146971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992123,0.00006909262,0.0002551942,0.000035321784,0.00023841846,0.0001896321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889714,0.00015400078,0.00023115972,0.00007098397,0.00012401135,0.0005226881],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012459555,0.000039615257,0.00004450887,0.00017320336,0.0024236864,0.0030570584,0.00045633514,0.000028009707,0.00025734195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007702113,0.000028992492,0.00001616126,0.0007220118,0.00090340315,0.02454615,0.000012379478,0.00017991393,0.000024517623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021093833,0.0000016452956,0.002175947,8.744648e-7,0.0000014438857,1.8319454e-7,0.007964881,0.0000012967738,0.0000063611224,0.8964737,0.07502493,0.018346606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062468804,0.000016926573,0.0032511898,0.000005869912,0.000001268129,0.000009506661,0.0065988963,0.000042629374,0.000058247493,0.0024498794,0.987461,0.0000421582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005591204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004360279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94284016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031347317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045017963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3294008","doi":"10.29173/alr36","title":"Forgotten? The Role of Graduate Legal Education in the Future of the Law Faculty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Legal education; Legal profession; Graduate education; Legal research; Law; Political science; Legal writing; Legal psychology; Odds; Empirical legal studies; Graduate students; Sociology; Legal realism; Higher education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03277949819068998,"score_gpt":0.37861241550023117,"score_spread":0.3458329173095412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3294008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006794901,0.0071891313,9.3267005e-7,0.41961956,0.0004792688,0.0006736505,0.000002738756,0.000003378092,0.56523645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748748,0.0021108591,0.00002664835,0.02134522,0.00023118983,0.00005324892,0.00000882249,0.0000041824005,0.001345022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851704,0.00074032514,0.00027981622,0.00008471323,0.00027552422,0.000102600745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986101,0.0005444766,0.0002795435,0.00036427897,0.00018495684,0.000016690883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015956584,0.00006144548,0.00012572396,0.00000838615,0.0003226537,0.000044847464,0.0005299239,0.000033540964,0.00008629812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005934821,0.0000278778,0.000080095095,0.0005923441,0.00023289966,0.00029694688,0.00002046066,0.00022348399,0.000018855368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.9462826e-7,0.000056726272,0.00027369402,0.000053310137,0.000004207194,3.0231484e-9,0.004339048,1.3910243e-7,0.000003343824,0.97396487,0.0069314293,0.01437263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027149135,0.0000053574963,0.0013200758,0.0001817879,0.00003424494,8.419848e-7,0.0032409527,0.0000010371889,0.000021289146,0.008274264,0.9868563,0.000036721885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.117849775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14475127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97992486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016297048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004279868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88802457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W330098045","doi":"","title":"The Ottawa Special Services Project: A Case Study in Destabilization","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World Order","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; Demise; Law; Sociology; Ideology; Politics; Defense attorney; Capitalism; Imprisonment; Political science","score_opus":0.06860578413351978,"score_gpt":0.4314862010918542,"score_spread":0.3628804169583344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W330098045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80933046,0.00038182997,0.000093587405,0.03863447,0.0047399006,0.0010914315,0.0000024659898,0.000035089637,0.14569074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868844,0.00013807003,0.00014393906,0.0011991459,0.00763937,0.000016249578,0.0000010790417,0.000016159072,0.0039615734],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741775,0.0008112354,0.00072719145,0.0001332235,0.00058894145,0.00032163426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597645,0.00094357505,0.0006549866,0.00011229884,0.002234315,0.00007834984],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029241017,0.00012618188,0.00020249795,0.00033056067,0.0017838307,0.0005480933,0.00033213603,0.00006539909,0.00041159504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021643913,0.00010219886,0.00006606645,0.0029179659,0.00019531291,0.001032039,0.000028356042,0.00062175473,0.000014628083],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034058638,0.0017584106,0.02825831,0.000050539275,0.00012823149,0.0011283854,0.8607998,0.000034941677,0.000027087697,0.06141383,0.027984787,0.018075125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005201761,0.00004752579,0.003403632,0.000011939167,0.00015733762,0.00007826955,0.35534006,0.000008205766,0.000001060812,0.00018977936,0.6401491,0.00009290256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009607166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17758536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6121643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020060095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019867343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W332617879","doi":"","title":"The Legal Turn of Mind","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETC.: A Review of General Semantics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Law; Politics; Economic Justice; Political science; Government (linguistics); Rest (music); Legal profession; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025998108692801357,"score_gpt":0.3830076647904445,"score_spread":0.3570095560976432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W332617879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10694852,0.07667406,0.00003284775,0.34422868,0.0011126001,0.0007792749,0.000020613319,0.000021499523,0.4701819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35218054,0.52095014,0.0044906167,0.007284224,0.0011165766,0.000023725228,0.000020842932,0.000021171976,0.113912195],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884105,0.00022355186,0.0003944229,0.00008089127,0.0003204409,0.00013966327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990703,0.00018083057,0.00023032071,0.00021180714,0.0002648196,0.000041949606],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011864655,0.000059607228,0.0001593243,0.0000194966,0.00025744247,0.000041456442,0.00024589195,0.000036695747,0.0023845306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006685181,0.00004137744,0.00008377754,0.00050781964,0.00021331785,0.00019447491,0.000011137849,0.00014036446,0.00006614566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101246005,0.00018980277,0.00029783326,0.0008516031,0.000060607763,0.0000012810488,0.0045440365,0.000006166225,0.00024396312,0.26828086,0.19796368,0.52755004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004111379,0.000013224322,0.000317369,0.0003301999,0.00003147927,0.0000012209247,0.00020618903,0.000009694131,0.00018424269,0.0002447631,0.9985698,0.000050695628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017635559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005328524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80060613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017559156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004502587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W336679764","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of Unified Family Courts in Maryland and California: Their Relevance for Ontario's Family Justice System","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Economic Justice; Family law; Family court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04039778599118415,"score_gpt":0.35025638453104635,"score_spread":0.3098585985398622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W336679764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94051105,0.000087772474,0.0026517792,0.005390992,0.00014511865,0.0002972869,0.00005901128,0.00003425792,0.05082273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950033,0.000037995516,0.002482995,0.00079242623,0.000067921574,0.000019816009,0.000026473856,0.000004191621,0.0015648836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916065,0.00010417805,0.00027663953,0.00016244121,0.00014679038,0.00014927893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988795,0.00055553584,0.00012836354,0.00014092788,0.0002290479,0.00006660552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097282813,0.00006730027,0.00018105334,0.00020791264,0.00020240086,0.00007497484,0.00011026724,0.000069443144,0.0000615831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019478213,0.000058356025,0.000032642743,0.00071677257,0.00006852862,0.0004495294,0.0000069740363,0.00010856183,0.000002687957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035605626,0.00096374576,0.09372584,0.00026206693,0.00063004316,0.0000019961994,0.16637003,0.0051579466,0.0022302035,0.69120497,0.011240001,0.027857127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053395005,0.000049410537,0.13092725,0.00002345368,0.0007970963,4.043462e-7,0.13387914,0.012001268,0.000047564477,0.00025708528,0.72125965,0.00022372218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2023728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6304596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71001965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000216081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005481835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80293864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341925358","doi":"10.33137/cal.v1i1.20923","title":"Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Legal Studies Beyond Both Disciplinarity and Interdisciplinarity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Meaning (existential); Virtue; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Critical reflection; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.07251374655372697,"score_gpt":0.45224369480041626,"score_spread":0.37972994824668926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W341925358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75745153,0.00039858813,0.0021530958,0.1875482,0.0001609235,0.00012641573,0.00004877871,0.000046487705,0.052065965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828804,0.00003316791,0.0006582859,0.00038954566,0.00013669298,0.000007065101,0.00000854616,0.0000036573424,0.00047499748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873066,0.00026954888,0.00029985665,0.00024902617,0.00026143607,0.00018945578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973759,0.0019462924,0.00007108988,0.00015310232,0.0002954122,0.00015820227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012766301,0.0000917187,0.00038617826,0.00014452056,0.0008219181,0.00023015524,0.00011529251,0.00007443634,0.000076470686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025722822,0.00008065096,0.00007968523,0.00066878897,0.0011018998,0.00070415036,0.00016674674,0.00022462926,0.000003162492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008668365,0.00007681219,0.019914696,0.000031911197,0.00040181182,4.0305645e-7,0.009973747,0.000002671327,0.0000115937555,0.96856534,0.00051793206,0.00049439154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008202954,0.00035956595,0.30104232,0.000111604066,0.011682441,0.000002546298,0.07630261,0.0034783692,0.00009126151,0.32855037,0.27659568,0.00096294965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017709066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006133796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.640015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031601052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006646008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63216126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343959264","doi":"","title":"\"Now I See It for What It Really Is\": The Impact of Participation in an Innocence Project Practicum on Criminology Students","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Practicum; Psychology; Conviction; Criminal justice; Feeling; Imprisonment; Criminology; Coursework; Social psychology; Law; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.31672631796511247,"score_gpt":0.5795727542969988,"score_spread":0.26284643633188637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W343959264","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42119706,0.013506093,0.000047613685,0.50645375,0.001557538,0.008024328,0.000026699783,0.000057772315,0.049129147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665506,0.0180337,0.00010523312,0.0145456875,0.00013726839,0.00034064177,0.000015822177,0.000008209769,0.00026286615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981084,0.00072985963,0.00042473926,0.00014955364,0.00029063327,0.0002968266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980609,0.0008284096,0.00042399138,0.00028436436,0.00034444456,0.00005791935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031408647,0.00009625153,0.00019903615,0.00004618364,0.00022356372,0.00014463074,0.0003118425,0.000066113935,0.0002530136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022374007,0.00006517605,0.00006906334,0.0005192692,0.00012674124,0.0028485102,0.000021775495,0.00019864186,0.000059371738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010749499,0.003409384,0.032506693,0.0007410302,0.0001247912,6.284277e-7,0.098654404,0.0000043490872,0.000076048396,0.6872994,0.13898286,0.038092908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019637287,0.0002494107,0.023831498,0.00088092143,0.00010142403,0.0000013787151,0.0036467258,0.0000057416037,0.000038506092,0.00051957875,0.97038525,0.00014319764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00580476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004295218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83140236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120749384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005781744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87750995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W345341298","doi":"","title":"Planning and Conduct of the National Conference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.0903722199174186,"score_gpt":0.4345304889674785,"score_spread":0.34415826905005986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W345341298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64409655,0.0013866602,0.0001173755,0.1756154,0.00024080976,0.0001269919,0.0000023301038,0.000004234641,0.17840965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821913,0.00023075972,0.00012284725,0.000778812,0.00016711601,3.0969636e-7,1.4344292e-7,0.000002165705,0.0004787171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991035,0.00024553554,0.00021254913,0.00003620215,0.00033469932,0.0000675271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727434,0.0010844348,0.0006718611,0.000032372533,0.000914336,0.000022683676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002499713,0.000039801365,0.00006694955,0.000032491214,0.00036815007,0.00009883045,0.00013630543,0.000030320845,0.00004013268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014481128,0.000022403026,0.000012046168,0.00023941832,0.000234914,0.0009536681,0.000014260394,0.00028771095,0.0000010165265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011460133,0.00065316487,0.023339555,0.00025982547,0.00034196765,0.0000056284507,0.39756468,0.0015480338,0.008402109,0.5137383,0.040496193,0.012504526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064585515,0.00009722718,0.011506929,0.00016316188,0.00025337524,0.00038411203,0.11529443,0.000105869556,0.0026276342,0.076034434,0.79271066,0.00017632438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044584041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003824655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75221443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009978373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062228966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.283155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W34545688","doi":"10.1057/9781137331021.0033","title":"Inside-Out as Law School Pedagogy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Mathematics education; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.048898311010712264,"score_gpt":0.36374127034500336,"score_spread":0.3148429593342911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W34545688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019834364,0.00017003375,0.000056218687,0.0065834327,0.0018859934,0.0005116531,0.000028965627,0.00021914618,0.9905247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46940076,0.000073023,0.00013951329,0.007381532,0.0018222295,0.00002772535,0.000055205837,0.000064467844,0.52103555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753684,0.00017871965,0.0005476516,0.00052460603,0.0007364544,0.00047573296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974548,0.00044369543,0.00050062727,0.000656887,0.0005163188,0.00042767273],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008160549,0.00039179862,0.0004229031,0.00025066,0.0008844151,0.00040466528,0.0005275721,0.00062802085,0.008735757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006829503,0.00041091963,0.00020743227,0.000036425197,0.00064581004,0.000013768329,0.000096115175,0.0011424907,0.009637542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001047759,0.0000012391599,0.00001551707,0.000015594871,0.00006223907,0.000009257296,0.004910897,9.9365806e-8,0.000012086242,0.9817408,0.002786151,0.010435675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010036651,0.00002495665,0.000010840054,0.000034236993,0.00004224049,0.000004058668,0.0003755637,3.0115228e-7,0.000011869789,0.4316253,0.5674811,0.00028913174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009175859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02672163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.564695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022100651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022555564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35222582","doi":"10.21991/c9th43","title":"TWELVE PARADOXES OF JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0757601109956105,"score_gpt":0.348099049291131,"score_spread":0.27233893829552047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35222582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010462969,0.00034624117,0.05360379,0.029078202,0.0045215245,0.0006839533,0.00024774685,0.00021956932,0.900836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945405,0.000062808314,0.0032620633,0.00091903657,0.00027545268,0.000056203695,0.00007198472,0.0000068203253,0.0008051332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779636,0.00012364626,0.00065681816,0.00032493155,0.00056277163,0.0005354554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817955,0.00024158576,0.00035462866,0.00028538748,0.0007145841,0.00022423457],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006664687,0.00019802242,0.00026690107,0.00028836427,0.0018436792,0.00006962764,0.00039478973,0.0001875116,0.0026309323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001466155,0.00020025483,0.00017052106,0.0008785416,0.009039569,0.001472039,0.00009015496,0.00034027593,0.00028389491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056625566,0.00028778746,0.021004397,0.0000069427424,0.00005291806,0.0000042648194,0.002100437,0.0000174802,0.00007370763,0.9688024,0.006769684,0.0008233901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00109189,0.00008331167,0.0046914006,0.00011391753,0.000114680806,0.00004820563,0.02314672,0.000050071365,0.0008753179,0.22899765,0.7402005,0.0005863182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002705161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019083914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015285326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050503495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35798458","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2022.04.005","title":"What I Wish I'd Known About Legal Writing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Wish; Legal writing; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Legal research; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.033541409618777,"score_gpt":0.38645451236816786,"score_spread":0.35291310274939086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35798458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014049671,0.00003729754,0.0005167106,0.13242628,0.0015628794,0.000059437894,1.9875473e-7,0.00010015339,0.8512474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91902924,0.00006038959,0.0009506359,0.006470446,0.00095780706,0.0000071135437,0.0000028343745,0.0000044473195,0.07251711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927425,0.00013243334,0.00013268639,0.00010352968,0.0001903611,0.0001667077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993063,0.00029160854,0.00005446474,0.00010263028,0.00017469736,0.00007026097],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010284577,0.000040948627,0.00004928844,0.000041722586,0.0005692596,0.0012241433,0.00012365381,0.000045174973,0.0032953753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010195124,0.000039721264,0.00002222314,0.0003337995,0.000087989014,0.0030185606,0.000012634049,0.00015772787,0.00054613064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.2040294e-7,0.000023360562,0.0004499722,0.0000012719357,0.0000022713693,1.05319096e-7,0.004755555,6.287401e-7,0.000020645672,0.9169867,0.03474684,0.043012027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047632333,0.000005503867,0.0009075665,0.000008200666,0.0000026907055,4.4660183e-7,0.018314572,0.00002992786,0.000030982283,0.0018407255,0.97874844,0.000063333966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043519805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033445526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94400156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032421747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028173235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37009152","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1315","title":"The Law School, the Profession, and Arthurs' Humane Professionalism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal profession; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03657544421843368,"score_gpt":0.3794238012856442,"score_spread":0.3428483570672105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37009152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004379477,0.00085984246,0.000024928087,0.36534414,0.0013603799,0.00019096085,0.0000026785738,0.0000271747,0.6278104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97025687,0.0001250046,0.0001690647,0.0037319825,0.0013465278,0.000019609543,0.0000027667222,0.000009217201,0.024338955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981572,0.0006434602,0.0002961615,0.00011246921,0.0004991745,0.00029153345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857116,0.0005468523,0.00026693498,0.00016737515,0.00034795346,0.00009973084],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002477405,0.00008906587,0.0000762964,0.000020053034,0.012094859,0.0008486012,0.00031907108,0.000082166276,0.00045404804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031844678,0.000046280726,0.000040412033,0.0002082343,0.00068444037,0.00086027436,0.00004122679,0.0010798218,0.00006604192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081742655,0.000045008204,0.00023791417,0.0000013151126,0.000008590886,0.0000015226589,0.0016916222,0.0000011118071,0.000037981972,0.96280426,0.03442157,0.00074093876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013623948,0.000008023966,0.0016755249,0.000023672079,0.000010741271,0.00002720773,0.0069715,0.000002891329,0.000019330482,0.29830307,0.69275755,0.00006425851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05351612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2627705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9658774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058452708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005213669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98919123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W371954929","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1224","title":"The Gender Trap: Flexible Work in Corporate Legal Practice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Elite; Equity (law); Economic Justice; Work (physics); Public relations; Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Political science; Business; Law; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.10275099934079375,"score_gpt":0.39819057180694284,"score_spread":0.2954395724661491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W371954929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00144792,0.000316783,0.0010522514,0.073770344,0.0015022514,0.00010957797,5.6515967e-7,0.000029377476,0.92177093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98744804,0.00023595613,0.002487003,0.0031411783,0.00086680794,0.0000037598502,0.0000011619035,0.000011125144,0.0058049527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801457,0.00045437895,0.00041511178,0.00012246949,0.000539649,0.0004537968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752825,0.0012186907,0.00050800544,0.00014495496,0.0004205671,0.00017955225],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008417006,0.00008843766,0.00008667045,0.00007953146,0.002486579,0.0011143808,0.00031970034,0.00009451016,0.0003318224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014951054,0.00006890777,0.00005077449,0.0009850059,0.00023877529,0.0019944313,0.000016476899,0.0012794266,0.00012637056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010198625,0.00010852118,0.0007582619,7.517685e-7,0.000017584169,0.00003646028,0.004914068,0.000018185336,0.000014250039,0.9814455,0.007123013,0.005461399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022477312,0.000014558242,0.0030425447,0.000009120031,0.000012831663,0.00007858152,0.016258698,0.0000014844028,0.000031419735,0.046884064,0.93334025,0.00010167547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034763794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19275628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9860001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020223761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000883143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38739752","doi":"10.1093/brain/awae078","title":"Preparing Professionals as Moral Agents. Carnegie Perspectives.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Temerty Family Foundation","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.08326266207152325,"score_gpt":0.46017633129016766,"score_spread":0.37691366921864444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W38739752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069049224,0.000034485623,0.000067792826,0.07990146,0.00040728,0.00016838916,5.3567067e-7,0.000100937425,0.8502699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9427122,0.000016450778,0.0011040844,0.0020561023,0.00021994539,0.000021976215,0.0000024078051,0.0000045967445,0.05386225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992567,0.0000667652,0.00010683418,0.0001404294,0.00026612318,0.00016320031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951154,0.00005833306,0.000056410467,0.00010398051,0.00018991239,0.00007979796],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037678308,0.00004849699,0.000050954262,0.000054122425,0.00058335694,0.00012990682,0.00012391339,0.000048164617,0.003373074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008672812,0.000044125594,0.000028629522,0.00039392547,0.0000923105,0.00078558695,0.000021931794,0.00016903253,0.0005423394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023944917,0.0001313587,0.0004710416,0.0000010270393,0.000007288523,5.736242e-7,0.08049373,0.000014219476,0.000010468625,0.9064544,0.011896178,0.00051730656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019676279,0.0000127935045,0.0039192108,0.000010869658,0.0000068920785,0.0000012127394,0.218384,0.0000015357901,0.00010982904,0.025532154,0.7517102,0.00011455375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025099915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039121415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88092226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022330476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00174828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4019421","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.198969","title":"Developmentally Appropriate Questions for Child Witnesses","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.014361733596138961,"score_gpt":0.33366031886666264,"score_spread":0.3192985852705237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4019421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12327358,0.0017760948,0.022797115,0.3568885,0.0016505357,0.0010044287,0.000010374848,0.0002441927,0.49235517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570091,0.0035593547,0.0013959638,0.00085481344,0.0008004651,0.000036737154,0.000009730684,0.0000134613465,0.036320396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983911,0.000092729155,0.00019311268,0.00010527188,0.00019248461,0.001025292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950975,0.00008193318,0.0000923655,0.0000629667,0.00018203852,0.00007095172],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018683437,0.00006922455,0.000069477865,0.00007033565,0.0017905282,0.00020718764,0.00019450107,0.000053379594,0.00091497117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003318715,0.000065999644,0.000046040444,0.00035885465,0.00007360927,0.00066908565,0.000003839422,0.0010130435,0.00010107468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001971029,0.00007859536,0.00016013504,0.0000012868434,0.000041425024,1.2823605e-7,0.0028951657,0.000010032448,0.000008084787,0.9070237,0.000706294,0.08905539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021933338,0.000035641242,0.00030782545,0.000008171176,0.000015213886,0.000044958742,0.0066283527,0.0000032732837,0.00000882789,0.26149222,0.73113614,0.00010006828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076513784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008284299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83373547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059716514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010407928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200435666","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-84550-6_3","title":"Transsystemic and Multilingual Contexts of Legal Education: Short Iterations on Two Dogmas of Legal Positivism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Positivism; Legal realism; Legal education; Legal formalism; Epistemology; Empirical legal studies; Legal psychology; Legal profession; Legal research; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Comparative law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.044512842723372234,"score_gpt":0.393247586877176,"score_spread":0.34873474415380373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200435666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022465607,0.0013876284,0.000048252256,0.004276915,0.0023312087,0.0005272499,0.00012401605,0.000031544158,0.9688076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74603635,0.000049591414,0.00018988793,0.0002160752,0.00038375845,0.00001511876,0.00013331303,0.00001730783,0.25295857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982289,0.00014917049,0.0006725131,0.000323214,0.00045950167,0.0001667113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979292,0.00037249835,0.00035738945,0.0002970382,0.0009292903,0.00011454427],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037120518,0.00022417691,0.00047498808,0.00023825635,0.0003057677,0.00019995165,0.00018295873,0.00019255007,0.00039051924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010941653,0.0002462168,0.00012691837,0.00015512598,0.0003085004,0.00041032617,0.000017564627,0.0005965617,0.000014427853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002862698,0.00018843138,0.00003878133,0.00005409173,0.00007912594,0.0000040279647,0.0064157797,0.000010564741,0.00033882918,0.98474514,0.0052601174,0.0028364726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033409343,0.000106774176,0.00020936159,0.000665727,0.00013842325,0.000025658073,0.0021664938,0.0000257695,0.00058255676,0.0012131303,0.99419236,0.00033963672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021670733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003891983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98893225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000926152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038671512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200485336","doi":"10.37506/ijfmt.v16i1.17551","title":"Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Online Studying Cas’s Study Alasala University KAS Law School","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Quarter (Canadian coin); The Internet; Quality (philosophy); Legal education; Service (business); Higher education; Work (physics); Academic year; Empirical research; Political science; Public relations; Medical education; Business; Law; Engineering; Marketing; Computer science; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.17448260506510427,"score_gpt":0.44791004762873843,"score_spread":0.27342744256363416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200485336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8394495,0.00026944047,0.000052175576,0.15173073,0.0014124895,0.00014524908,0.0000064948113,0.000013696879,0.006920172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865411,0.00013233827,0.00047654274,0.010529018,0.000846104,5.2133555e-7,0.000005179457,0.0000069640996,0.0014622442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794716,0.00083665346,0.00042602516,0.00017044201,0.00038325504,0.00023644746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973189,0.00083589985,0.00047229076,0.00014014398,0.0006087555,0.0006239567],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017098761,0.00010374725,0.00032076848,0.00029696306,0.000667702,0.000040034825,0.00019914909,0.00010566229,0.0020574236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051348074,0.00009506829,0.000039756254,0.00076710037,0.00072883064,0.0004304388,0.0000464854,0.0007177478,0.000006828225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048393765,0.0031503085,0.2892011,0.000056334666,0.0008798931,0.017685555,0.4397272,0.000039715636,0.0007289241,0.122314945,0.06950418,0.056227915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028516438,0.0011096701,0.06168078,0.000035643625,0.00019763461,0.0008585948,0.36792848,0.000001271846,0.000015480222,0.0015861724,0.56359476,0.00013987556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041223317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055846766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49409056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038578713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003443385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200499726","doi":"10.1080/0731129x.2021.2010360","title":"Witness Preparation before Trial in Anglo-American Law: Aims, Dangers, and Remedies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Law; Expert witness; Political science; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.14725122313458483,"score_gpt":0.47678803127215985,"score_spread":0.329536808137575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200499726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75415593,0.00042660916,0.0005311805,0.1643131,0.0031122982,0.00045584238,0.000011545124,0.00009011701,0.07690337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914025,0.00029396557,0.0016594464,0.004429531,0.00085001165,0.000027451111,0.000030458315,0.00000802053,0.0012986109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984104,0.00056023215,0.00022972477,0.00021588297,0.00038961964,0.0001941494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793077,0.0011722228,0.00013616485,0.00014110746,0.000536808,0.00008293217],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014967906,0.00008015472,0.00012748271,0.000059912934,0.0006653076,0.00023066901,0.000094973584,0.0001451802,0.00006472271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009838138,0.00008669915,0.000020201844,0.0006038689,0.00079858914,0.0006137932,0.00003173364,0.0008389272,0.00001004154],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048728942,0.00010052312,0.00009892639,0.00010807354,0.000006756154,0.000011228835,0.29191926,0.0000040594664,0.000038552582,0.70380795,0.0006625452,0.002754858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026568698,0.0002224961,0.0011580243,0.00007879787,0.00045371446,0.000008874642,0.7180835,0.000051310984,0.00018949281,0.008939589,0.26790422,0.00025307978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008170763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077498674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6948683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009459297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017539924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200552522","doi":"10.3138/9781487512996-009","title":"5 What Does It Mean to Be Canadian?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.05392211297943915,"score_gpt":0.29356875831720347,"score_spread":0.2396466453377643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200552522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014112821,0.00033411177,0.0000060201887,0.013120354,0.0011978232,0.00022343975,0.00007047874,0.000021900372,0.98501176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00048226558,0.0007581066,0.00026751976,0.0015419263,0.00016282109,2.741605e-7,0.000024525389,0.000010713538,0.99675184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991124,0.00005501211,0.000113005335,0.00023413914,0.00030026902,0.00018513064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986907,0.00008910061,0.00013942784,0.00028170337,0.00048460905,0.0003144638],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020057408,0.00011831698,0.00017605347,0.00004433819,0.00046734978,0.00017003118,0.0003907043,0.00023283009,0.008465306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005464762,0.00014059545,0.00008542109,0.0000029389903,0.00016058634,0.00063778774,0.000073854826,0.0001974502,0.00001760844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071944132,0.0000060630705,4.3661365e-7,0.000009444548,0.000062817875,0.000012259875,0.20466493,5.012268e-7,0.0000029102162,0.73974025,0.05154402,0.003949152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058876598,0.0000092936025,0.000002482472,0.00007772745,0.00005732673,2.2423325e-7,0.031132556,2.5787566e-7,0.000009259872,0.0002586167,0.9682298,0.0001635788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98029566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91668576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007623282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022819103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200627088","doi":"10.54157/tls.246477","title":"Women Lawyers for Social Causes: Professional Careers and Legal Development in Thailand","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Legal profession; Identity (music); Social change; Political science; Politics; Social activism; Sociology; Gender studies; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.06648094761425132,"score_gpt":0.3950938819470593,"score_spread":0.32861293433280797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200627088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8526072,0.00001916972,0.000042889733,0.076621264,0.00056179345,0.00021033899,0.000004521809,0.000022689406,0.06991016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94222546,0.0000055491464,0.0014996548,0.0018035067,0.00012604275,0.00012035757,0.000015270813,0.0000037582638,0.05420039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999405,0.00005580028,0.0001143402,0.00010984188,0.00014375376,0.00017125327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996046,0.00014924332,0.000030959713,0.000026494734,0.00014158955,0.000047132275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050360395,0.000039046645,0.000059000773,0.00003982097,0.0004898069,0.000117983865,0.00004078661,0.0000493859,0.00042301381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034086363,0.00003728477,0.00000863185,0.0002513803,0.000054521537,0.00033204415,0.000016384378,0.00009575049,0.000004598537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032298118,0.00018599183,0.020764766,0.000027008044,0.000029274035,0.000004869367,0.33591765,6.746166e-7,0.00014164315,0.6033625,0.029755123,0.009778187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023383397,0.0000030891624,0.010289229,0.0000035175456,0.0000012995241,4.230422e-7,0.12670794,0.0000012563846,0.00007728785,0.00039561282,0.8622255,0.00006104815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086012454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018824425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83247036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016574246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028737597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205882795","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197612910.001.0001","title":"The Right to Higher Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Privilege (computing); Politics; Economic Justice; Public relations; Political science; Higher education; Institution; Sociology; Public administration; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.04083327036017959,"score_gpt":0.40542058877773923,"score_spread":0.36458731841755965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205882795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.6039937e-7,0.00021333864,0.000005180475,0.29562443,0.004710581,0.00014634761,0.0000014041943,0.000030046704,0.6992681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007497619,0.000103642684,0.0002529835,0.014141142,0.0027165876,0.00005270925,0.00004664211,0.000010178769,0.98260117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999141,0.00010787056,0.00015577606,0.00015030708,0.00030623664,0.00013884611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857205,0.00044879763,0.00009284771,0.00025126277,0.0005390472,0.00009599283],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004421423,0.0000751472,0.00006900537,0.000052654723,0.0010730467,0.0006333828,0.00025492616,0.00014066574,0.02614606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037293034,0.00005414278,0.00004164817,0.00029362817,0.00007597395,0.0001879382,0.000024727893,0.00032493946,0.0018893761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.6592159e-7,0.000009414217,5.627048e-7,7.2261344e-7,0.000004443609,6.645864e-8,0.0005727583,1.9509438e-8,2.2172468e-7,0.49331087,0.50262946,0.00347119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000856864,0.000002383991,0.000033046887,0.0000126163995,0.000010490798,1.6905199e-7,0.0006870287,1.5139424e-8,0.0000017499053,0.028343266,0.9708156,0.000085080435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011665049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046731955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46818614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033845616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015856931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206136761","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479803583.001.0001","title":"American Legal Education Abroad","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"New York University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Admiration; Globalization; Politics; Law; Political science; Power (physics); Legal education; Narrative; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.04108668392085554,"score_gpt":0.3232907249751698,"score_spread":0.2822040410543143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206136761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020247608,0.00012714032,0.000063314415,0.0035226725,0.0013318677,0.0002463978,0.000019495268,0.00012513102,0.99454373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00021435773,0.000089878944,0.0008070785,0.00094487116,0.0013924818,0.0000010617181,0.000121891375,0.00001949061,0.9964089],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986237,0.00023448217,0.0001490529,0.0003452263,0.00040713893,0.0002403985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850106,0.00016408318,0.00036599953,0.00035375546,0.0003555863,0.00025948862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015667109,0.00017180972,0.00021735646,0.00017919614,0.0006722299,0.00034314505,0.0004853786,0.00023266095,0.0004983896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012329021,0.00023409928,0.00011586244,0.00011718342,0.00037241596,0.00033499752,0.00007587111,0.0007493229,0.00004690695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070689234,0.000022354277,0.0000022384772,0.0000055664937,0.000026894235,0.000003532208,0.0037039588,3.0288936e-7,0.0000010446417,0.46011668,0.5155935,0.020516843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010276668,0.000012540566,0.000015331596,0.000054865828,0.000098076365,0.000001494348,0.005847869,3.36733e-7,0.000005514687,0.00033628376,0.9932825,0.00024243203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09565819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065489733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.477689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007830669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029536147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9759655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206186709","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3979034","title":"Online Legal Education in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.012542191776057136,"score_gpt":0.3401075045922228,"score_spread":0.32756531281616563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206186709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69856334,0.0018571237,0.00019211293,0.23731105,0.002050503,0.00007267451,0.000003194703,0.000009233796,0.059940793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97318244,0.0016028965,0.00010629344,0.0018503569,0.00055756996,0.0000018378493,0.000014202951,0.0000046748587,0.022679709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852145,0.00018437758,0.00017746406,0.000082529295,0.00024014276,0.0007940257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994538,0.00006683159,0.00008613706,0.00006666672,0.00026361356,0.00006294407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008761728,0.00004387776,0.000058093283,0.00006115573,0.00027353506,0.00010570202,0.00011794868,0.00002698061,0.00033817874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064838596,0.000047730962,0.000018851984,0.00056576193,0.000017076429,0.00049749797,0.0000068433146,0.0016777063,0.000009193794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038615462,0.00022342327,0.011490451,0.0000010606826,0.000014996808,0.0000042250263,0.0008732899,0.000015872036,0.000023869256,0.91038144,0.004457645,0.07250985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013384133,0.000008199429,0.006507657,0.000008478333,0.000006091485,0.00009250835,0.14542155,0.0000065128106,0.000013238888,0.05129058,0.79642355,0.000087811095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9783018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85909086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053847753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.49906662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206281372","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479803583.003.0004","title":"3. American Influences, Canadian Realities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"New York University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Political science; Section (typography); Style (visual arts); Graduate education; Sociology; History; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.07598099202203894,"score_gpt":0.29169397387309925,"score_spread":0.2157129818510603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206281372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017230412,0.00008506331,0.0000064253095,0.004559603,0.00041254313,0.00014791527,0.00008390378,0.00007435517,0.99461293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001099316,0.00017474587,0.0002644956,0.0011114101,0.00042645933,3.197429e-7,0.000052258823,0.000015332014,0.9968557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892896,0.00009247818,0.00012705736,0.00026543596,0.00031180173,0.00027429132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862987,0.00013713447,0.00022259433,0.00028309296,0.00026192106,0.00046541658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013909393,0.00015371222,0.00019270401,0.00021834909,0.00081083167,0.00024092542,0.00041751764,0.0002220343,0.0008599632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008233112,0.00020688231,0.00008026937,0.000048168975,0.00053331425,0.00019795127,0.0000456035,0.00057634915,0.000032502052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003990041,0.0000018985235,0.000009139757,0.0000034954933,0.000040923904,0.00002230151,0.006908088,6.480096e-7,2.630376e-7,0.8580356,0.12778032,0.007193303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064720894,0.000008507786,0.000022817438,0.00004148604,0.000059264148,9.919077e-7,0.0061204513,1.6508963e-7,0.0000014598264,0.00091400574,0.9925442,0.00022197771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9611525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86480355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86476386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005976353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010982264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99462456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206408485","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3956670","title":"The Law School Research-Track Job Markets: Advice and Resources for Ph.D. and LL.M. Candidates (Presentation Slides)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Presentation (obstetrics); Track (disk drive); Law; Business; Management; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Engineering; Medicine; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.02664670022613658,"score_gpt":0.393780465023974,"score_spread":0.36713376479783744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206408485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47130165,0.019905161,0.00018908545,0.43000954,0.00054196833,0.00055747025,0.000009575783,0.000050177405,0.07743536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95020103,0.020949041,0.00016712428,0.00065516616,0.00073237903,0.000030576713,0.000003933544,0.000012358731,0.0272484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974863,0.00073957513,0.00020605724,0.0001617892,0.00037661538,0.0010296521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713326,0.0018358561,0.000113574584,0.00010438563,0.0006830035,0.00012995038],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008161129,0.00006671152,0.00007404185,0.0000653178,0.0039935024,0.0012275932,0.00016124998,0.00006144369,0.00006975316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040836455,0.00005304413,0.000026963398,0.0004306208,0.0003231412,0.00081863516,0.000032019583,0.0016009308,0.000007754744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009417403,0.000026673002,0.0019644327,0.0000062966033,0.000065680375,9.35933e-7,0.0056593725,4.131696e-7,0.00024200922,0.9690844,0.011396678,0.011458944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002895816,0.000045323188,0.0015868753,0.000012739645,0.000016945383,0.000047547805,0.09697973,0.000019157129,0.000050753006,0.2451415,0.65574133,0.00006853764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045004184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105028145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7239429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003420887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004768486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206669746","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-87476-6_9","title":"Teaching Spanish Medical Students How to Write a Case History","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Syllabus; Subject (documents); Medical education; Medical history; Psychology; Medicine; Pedagogy; Library science; Computer science; Surgery","score_opus":0.0792050900307381,"score_gpt":0.4055338766846535,"score_spread":0.3263287866539154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206669746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000057530753,0.00015346435,0.00010819023,0.1546892,0.0019493228,0.0001800698,0.0000046415034,0.00007546679,0.84278214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033902798,0.000056541478,0.00071523665,0.019518165,0.0014265062,0.000012838804,0.000019751382,0.000023771352,0.9748369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975246,0.00014192618,0.00022963657,0.0003191989,0.0015836845,0.00020096211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858445,0.0003402508,0.00013726328,0.0002526855,0.00028759596,0.00039774098],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018996983,0.00015036413,0.00019399487,0.00015177262,0.0004911483,0.00040253406,0.00045718093,0.00035497168,0.045763038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023097056,0.00015883172,0.00008186317,0.000050711078,0.00011436145,0.0003335275,0.00015052469,0.0012562444,0.00045072587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.517519e-7,0.00003442312,0.000010155212,0.000005119603,0.00002829018,0.0006109302,0.009815405,1.1649425e-8,4.2176183e-7,0.62571687,0.35682857,0.0069488697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059829526,0.000010281675,0.000004082787,0.00005499899,0.000029094697,0.000096730786,0.0049280054,4.2678624e-7,1.0712684e-7,0.00047103988,0.99414986,0.00019555303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0149259735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038102943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6373213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087406515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003482336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206914033","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-84694-7_28","title":"The Witness Blanket: Responsibility Through an Ongoing Journey of Transformation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Transformative learning; Ceremony; Storytelling; Stewardship (theology); Political science; Blanket; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Pedagogy; Art; Politics; Literature; Philosophy; Narrative; Theology","score_opus":0.1073058335557445,"score_gpt":0.4086912029600432,"score_spread":0.3013853694042987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206914033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031569076,0.00006110074,0.00020567737,0.036866896,0.0005965809,0.0003225318,0.000021631015,0.00004286555,0.96156704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13785674,0.0014074858,0.00041188233,0.0011493906,0.0004018922,0.000030313862,0.00009456073,0.00002980181,0.8586179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983832,0.00029292513,0.0004475669,0.00015184181,0.00058578665,0.00013862971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981285,0.0007767729,0.00037635688,0.00031919777,0.00035404332,0.00004513866],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030013435,0.00010292385,0.00013530467,0.000064877124,0.0016597897,0.00015239078,0.0003217339,0.00012939832,0.010054873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047350352,0.00007980129,0.0000760101,0.00014545882,0.00035165285,0.0016768717,0.00001758278,0.0005839944,0.000022714754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003218705,0.00002060199,0.0000041757667,0.000006292917,0.000016030508,1.5893539e-7,0.041610267,0.0000027429703,0.0000037757045,0.9535178,0.0011752238,0.0036107372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055970027,0.000027549693,0.00003522345,0.0000082407305,0.000019773286,8.26955e-7,0.011001258,0.0000034538089,0.000009837182,0.11487972,0.8738669,0.00009122036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004416735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01124895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8726917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018035412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019245623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210963208","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001462","title":"Sustainable Professionalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Practice of law; Legal profession; Skepticism; Legal education; Professional responsibility; Politics; Political science; Accountability; Law; Legal practice; Suspect; Work (physics); Public interest; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.043088990300738116,"score_gpt":0.43891631556246835,"score_spread":0.39582732526173026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210963208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018931098,0.00010764932,0.000065156,0.25139922,0.00061382586,0.00007476636,3.2524395e-7,0.00003418431,0.7287738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493328,0.000020602392,0.00028048438,0.007820642,0.0007580517,0.0000013462054,0.0000014088171,0.0000025217441,0.04178215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914354,0.00015096835,0.00013875449,0.000053939923,0.0002680034,0.00024480157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993435,0.000050098526,0.00010271182,0.00006383453,0.00034429642,0.00009552151],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009991467,0.000039444283,0.000046945945,0.00004839495,0.0024172869,0.00036468753,0.00014091481,0.000044694087,0.0017948205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001995484,0.00003477828,0.000029347268,0.0002545692,0.00006796125,0.0012026872,0.0000064978917,0.00047006557,0.00010949464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031334775,0.000043453532,0.000019670519,6.348341e-7,0.000002347822,0.000012294776,0.010660228,4.7821345e-7,0.000017047549,0.9309868,0.05580388,0.0024500168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007707824,0.000010219045,0.0008935544,0.000004660406,0.0000032551109,0.000020843669,0.009683033,6.0563906e-7,0.000010806737,0.13054587,0.8587045,0.000045576486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015927339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019065505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9304017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009285209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063345925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213020685","doi":"10.1093/analys/anab045","title":"How Wrong Can You Be?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.060381239224374515,"score_gpt":0.389930906923018,"score_spread":0.3295496676986435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213020685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04088341,0.00008621204,0.00057662884,0.7609203,0.0002084619,0.000025481539,0.0000075444327,0.00003575099,0.19725622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9041174,0.00004379239,0.00037761597,0.0023209255,0.0001459346,0.0000036112908,0.000040072006,0.0000019404254,0.09294868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994002,0.000119888464,0.00006828523,0.000109968205,0.00019447629,0.00010718767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938565,0.00008771604,0.000050122904,0.00014785111,0.00027309582,0.000055543926],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002586299,0.00003119366,0.00007309296,0.0001066717,0.0003632499,0.000385438,0.00007629503,0.000031888343,0.002260442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089563377,0.000032465978,0.00008505301,0.0032820036,0.000043116233,0.00028907394,0.000009800466,0.00009154872,0.000019420522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002393642,0.00025851026,0.12647226,0.000005204394,0.0024094456,0.000024616735,0.077123925,0.00006534866,0.00035777185,0.68502927,0.08102419,0.027227081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022308768,0.00000108844,0.005197306,4.2195168e-7,0.00036474963,1.3639311e-7,0.02593235,0.000022543258,0.00010324567,0.00042274324,0.9678801,0.00005301676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011757629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080558896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8868559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004606626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052334287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213323247","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1671543","title":"The Scientific Model of Jurisprudence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.021749604461244857,"score_gpt":0.35964170348090724,"score_spread":0.3378920990196624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213323247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7861309,0.00054251286,0.005859269,0.12830105,0.0038897234,0.00017398318,0.0000018609152,0.00003183976,0.07506884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97912216,0.00049405167,0.00018444138,0.00006198223,0.00021669501,0.0000021124958,2.6597766e-7,0.0000034017687,0.019914875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855685,0.000073914984,0.00016372593,0.00006962725,0.00035175472,0.000784102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990989,0.0001659932,0.00017182768,0.00013523527,0.0003808171,0.000047244095],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006771091,0.000036163914,0.000039755312,0.0000540247,0.0021615797,0.0003396536,0.0004109212,0.000039226106,0.00004751849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011349404,0.000025725682,0.000037400343,0.00040555635,0.00042846793,0.00048957695,0.000011992178,0.0022405584,0.00002179565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030720491,0.000020622272,0.00016078916,2.352772e-7,0.0000070432443,1.9489395e-8,0.0022886798,0.000012013973,0.0021204832,0.9865505,0.0006350852,0.008201419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006612458,0.000014280299,0.00007335461,0.0000017394306,0.0000080217715,0.000008632659,0.0093407435,0.0002979184,0.00017029842,0.7433414,0.24662603,0.00005147069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037532765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027085485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24599095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001256491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018338952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213388798","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340088","title":"A Review of the Social Justice Function of Clinical Legal Education in Africa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Economic Justice; Social justice; Legal education; Political science; Function (biology); Thematic analysis; Legal research; Law; Sociology; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.3296623447927204,"score_gpt":0.5569728516614374,"score_spread":0.227310506868717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213388798","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000083093,0.9403215,0.0000023236037,0.009948407,0.0046060514,0.00039220016,0.000011988692,0.0000034295904,0.044705804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006589876,0.9958175,0.00008448752,0.00048577055,0.0013335436,0.000033837245,0.0000022518673,0.000013175366,0.0015704796],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930569,0.003041081,0.0027149841,0.00016284504,0.00082786666,0.0001963573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902707,0.0022483852,0.0060671,0.00018442246,0.0011729504,0.000056477107],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077261166,0.000182522,0.0017308764,0.0002713229,0.00051202433,0.000033623208,0.000631434,0.000109190354,0.00025742207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014559747,0.0001250608,0.00082637696,0.002555709,0.00051475916,0.00049786293,0.00011946712,0.0015112465,0.0000024662697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026893029,0.0005633137,0.000022959015,0.017736582,0.00045924494,0.0000015705505,0.0067460714,2.0663121e-7,3.9223064e-8,0.04200573,0.15199706,0.78044033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086278844,0.000098296645,0.000057097153,0.012593966,0.0020417525,0.0000083242585,0.025669087,1.8794648e-8,1.8513576e-8,0.00014876033,0.9591944,0.00010199092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041120537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019766006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80719733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003729454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015418034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99374104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221077201","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12640","title":"Ontario family justice in “lockdown”: Early pandemic cases and professional experience","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre; Queen's University; The King's University; St. Lawrence College; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Pandemic; Criminology; Welfare; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.1236343833310927,"score_gpt":0.4305607956654292,"score_spread":0.3069264123343365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221077201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89853656,0.044146143,0.00000768199,0.019121606,0.0019979696,0.00087349844,0.0000140691745,0.00005219054,0.035250302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94749373,0.020575384,0.00015560455,0.017964616,0.00011328215,0.00046106926,0.0000138374835,0.000008323655,0.013214151],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821,0.00051409466,0.00032839272,0.00023850772,0.000478847,0.0002301284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891317,0.00057930936,0.00014924514,0.00015741658,0.00011161758,0.00008925954],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014393675,0.00009708408,0.00019069744,0.00007208786,0.000921988,0.00006718101,0.00022800692,0.00003950129,0.0014206432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009814812,0.00009474774,0.000031951335,0.0007273644,0.00011049679,0.0004850943,0.00009377316,0.0006741171,0.000042926047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055832068,0.0007323627,0.29617137,0.0007805814,0.000029852734,0.00010957382,0.30181116,0.0000053938193,0.00022036627,0.031992253,0.30584925,0.062242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095552816,0.000023458882,0.10898573,0.0002633755,0.000027517464,0.000009805916,0.019586122,0.0000015136258,1.2271187e-7,0.00007790706,0.8708108,0.00011809374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11635225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029512607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56496155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003824629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021804192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225637981","doi":"10.12795/9788447222865.045","title":"La interrelación entre teoría y práctica como base de la docencia universitaria: un ciclo de mejora perfeccionado en el área de Derecho Penal","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Editorial Universidad de Sevilla eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Derecho; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.008498048870134408,"score_gpt":0.30494989538652123,"score_spread":0.29645184651638684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225637981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059321127,0.000060114806,0.00026899466,0.006797693,0.05370816,0.00062347477,0.00024471636,0.00024209128,0.93212265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.762286,0.000981177,0.0024515537,0.0009911194,0.15835041,0.000026984188,0.00021265529,0.00022315438,0.07447693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99311924,0.003155557,0.00056273525,0.0008413357,0.0012722021,0.0010489124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917333,0.005540727,0.00072970457,0.0005519839,0.000644448,0.0007998115],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003964118,0.000702519,0.00059990864,0.0006584781,0.002357185,0.0006110398,0.0013250156,0.001836975,0.007141782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018946743,0.0008730365,0.00046121777,0.00033121745,0.0009762208,0.00076266937,0.00049557607,0.0045742164,0.00012621726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065590726,0.00023150005,0.0005320086,0.000066809705,0.0005922142,0.00061180425,0.06595589,0.00007253438,0.00024040615,0.8083856,0.11849853,0.0041567897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015452536,0.00016414259,0.00015056547,0.00017305442,0.000762184,0.00012040928,0.045635622,0.000048476442,0.00006393684,0.009038016,0.9414758,0.0008225498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011876146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063384586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8576457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007012701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014799629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229541775","doi":"10.1093/ageing/31.suppl_1.35","title":"Law &amp; Ethics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Age and Ageing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.19055968903387782,"score_gpt":0.4159691680008202,"score_spread":0.22540947896694236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229541775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036641225,0.00019379472,0.00010792681,0.086113915,0.0002136131,0.000037341313,4.1723672e-7,0.000042336018,0.87664944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97491765,0.00023324281,0.0004658965,0.007081236,0.00018721506,0.0000018528136,0.0000010928898,0.0000021204567,0.017109664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964154,0.00007374492,0.000052769017,0.000056666235,0.00009350341,0.00008178667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996226,0.00023820467,0.000022068682,0.00004819654,0.00003392784,0.000034997476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033841882,0.000023340044,0.0000271855,0.000015324562,0.0007372974,0.00017775239,0.000038371603,0.00004537143,0.0009034224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051489513,0.000022914504,0.000008434257,0.00014393423,0.00009130302,0.0003396503,0.000007790099,0.00024913833,0.00013746321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.2293625e-7,0.000016463,0.000041308413,0.0000029169717,0.0000028226214,0.00004874598,0.08543738,2.4860114e-7,0.00006252974,0.89328825,0.008235786,0.012863304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024768306,0.0000015437171,0.00036827472,0.000004597716,0.0000025816016,4.7309916e-7,0.0017000716,0.0000024833503,0.000002583092,0.003977019,0.99388045,0.000035128778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060908813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008664039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007720641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021628093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229758494","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_363","title":"Cornell University","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Psychology; History","score_opus":0.05518876873207582,"score_gpt":0.29195533339813634,"score_spread":0.23676656466606052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229758494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005808553,0.000052794712,0.000055011336,0.0007890219,0.00096817303,0.00027402223,0.000062007384,0.0001179726,0.9976229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65029395,0.000055939618,0.00011315289,0.00042443982,0.0007371964,8.441219e-7,0.000028111703,0.000021735388,0.3483246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880964,0.0000773095,0.0002000386,0.00033806992,0.0003027273,0.00027221363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985392,0.00019443118,0.00028195034,0.00037555266,0.00042566282,0.00018317543],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042490425,0.00020844469,0.0002027656,0.00018006166,0.0006277913,0.00011591951,0.0003856556,0.00035713855,0.01550862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013217384,0.00023812873,0.00012319896,0.00004600581,0.000620588,0.000002044368,0.00006625423,0.00044197802,0.0026401524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011398309,2.632794e-7,0.000029568848,0.000005477304,0.00004074561,0.000010912801,0.0046140677,4.5868685e-8,0.0000024293688,0.9909513,0.0024401145,0.0018936709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006633829,0.000014309136,0.000032862485,0.000015861811,0.00003402852,0.0000012235332,0.00064763473,6.200406e-7,0.0000028955685,0.5071737,0.49183258,0.00017790013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015192239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039253747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6502359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002189948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000940226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230110372","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11701","title":"Designing and Evaluating Training for Discipline-Specific Peer Writing Tutors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"TUTOR; Peer tutor; Set (abstract data type); Training (meteorology); Process (computing); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Empirical research; Psychology; Writing center; Computer science; Medical education; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.24420295965868546,"score_gpt":0.5072587487999846,"score_spread":0.2630557891412991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230110372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093997784,0.00039671813,0.009691899,0.03761076,0.0044565257,0.0016640347,0.00003194749,0.00027823003,0.8518721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5678153,0.00011300954,0.051123176,0.0003293609,0.0034988245,0.00041683426,0.0005493934,0.00007738755,0.3760767],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983607,0.000135113,0.00038929435,0.0003150836,0.0004906022,0.0003092222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967351,0.001859145,0.00033002743,0.000098710596,0.0008867967,0.00009024311],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034890836,0.0001479288,0.00017537967,0.00016054025,0.0018241713,0.00058412994,0.0001326736,0.00020285316,0.00068978267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004208987,0.0001289516,0.000057661764,0.0002591709,0.00006296492,0.0007047194,0.000008210515,0.00026808036,0.000015797343],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005812046,0.000031382817,0.00020352537,0.00007876256,0.000047433372,3.8017546e-7,0.33593765,0.0000011386996,0.004256033,0.27315694,0.010832078,0.37539655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004475649,0.0000453189,0.00080229447,0.00031136,0.00006785402,7.425139e-7,0.58507437,0.000046706882,0.0004058831,0.009782108,0.40251073,0.00050508056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023623115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008696328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47579542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009646295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011340596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230788073","doi":"10.3138/9781442682290","title":"The Scales of Success","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apex (geometry); Window (computing); Legal profession; Political science; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Medicine; Anatomy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.034945336835383436,"score_gpt":0.30168102279745657,"score_spread":0.26673568596207314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230788073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020481766,0.0007542614,0.000022301354,0.0005248279,0.0002968353,0.00017463016,0.000025008274,0.000018329334,0.99816334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010512406,0.0012755805,0.000085212574,0.00001778526,0.000115528615,1.9051701e-7,0.0000068703475,0.0000053740196,0.99744225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992107,0.00012339225,0.00013140871,0.00011019485,0.00030478154,0.00011950648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985401,0.00036811217,0.00040107773,0.00023613736,0.00040496272,0.00004963063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033064745,0.00007579147,0.00014230938,0.000013256482,0.0005650301,0.00003547406,0.0006105461,0.00016389517,0.00038698938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082814506,0.00007513427,0.00008317749,0.0000035864139,0.00075435574,0.00023250865,0.00006924418,0.00016837948,0.00000302918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004183501,0.000027834005,0.00002225194,0.000030227357,0.0000911583,0.0000015955758,0.031828232,8.226243e-7,0.0000035040587,0.7487382,0.20263086,0.016583452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008327695,0.000010811626,0.000057219087,0.00003309291,0.00004591356,1.4587178e-7,0.0017017816,8.160031e-7,0.000007792884,0.000778864,0.9972059,0.00007434384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4665698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43814722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7945751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025460884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011304799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57210517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231695225","doi":"10.2307/3504707","title":"10.2307/3504707","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Morality; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.019689472480741894,"score_gpt":0.3036761265075406,"score_spread":0.28398665402679873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231695225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003905393,0.000008121342,3.9755417e-7,0.033341054,0.000008541969,0.000090028596,0.000002601574,0.000080606485,0.9660781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014811391,4.696937e-7,0.0001367645,0.0007116054,0.00024562207,0.000011009534,0.000005161597,0.000004834955,0.9974034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945945,0.00006718578,0.00008695133,0.00008817666,0.00015632404,0.00014190898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996058,0.000091925736,0.000019406558,0.00010801585,0.000079369434,0.00009550428],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030136752,0.000038791553,0.00004377908,0.000043641958,0.0003001368,0.00012026121,0.00013019767,0.000034016757,0.99868166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029800663,0.000040908784,0.00001737685,0.00049435,0.000040321098,0.0003138313,0.0000059864005,0.000086300955,0.9903953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066530633,0.00003288769,3.664683e-7,3.5773004e-7,0.0000028581849,2.9176502e-7,0.00079231965,0.0000035923536,0.0000042150614,0.00050116575,0.5688561,0.4297992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035522717,0.000013282657,0.000044578806,0.0000018322679,0.000003600107,3.4947658e-7,0.00004297151,0.0000032036032,0.0000036765696,0.000041068703,0.99974954,0.000060365484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010797479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000072023086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43089345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000387988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002494942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23084399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231699371","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_314","title":"Centre for Asia-Pacific Initiatives (CAPI)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Optometrists; Camargo Foundation; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Royal Academy of Engineering; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government","keywords":"Asia pacific; Geography; Political science; Environmental science; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.05120010329582189,"score_gpt":0.3344249235467145,"score_spread":0.2832248202508926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231699371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011494945,0.00015174417,0.00009860494,0.005512265,0.0014615486,0.000987582,0.00028058735,0.000131775,0.9913644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7195922,0.00009828969,0.0007607882,0.0005295933,0.0021849724,0.000051447267,0.0001772463,0.00006815296,0.2765373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998098,0.00009279881,0.00044128206,0.00047044398,0.00044370056,0.0004537736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751514,0.00058043643,0.0004942807,0.00040361096,0.0007974543,0.00020908476],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059870427,0.00034131715,0.00033699244,0.00026467335,0.00086986565,0.00028718027,0.00037646695,0.0004475205,0.007991814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005181803,0.00035143585,0.0002201018,0.00004958138,0.0006299257,0.000005423327,0.000048346046,0.0004213568,0.00088028505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020784099,7.570434e-7,0.00002490964,0.000022346114,0.00008881779,0.000002038626,0.017001793,1.4553616e-8,0.000007312486,0.9740878,0.005358408,0.0033850595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011754724,0.000026472564,0.000019979032,0.000041458927,0.000043800697,8.744046e-7,0.003121768,8.262597e-7,0.000018628316,0.49686489,0.49949688,0.0002468986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019963163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015873943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7195807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001655892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010779002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231824297","doi":"10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosl028.pub2","title":"Legal Profession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Jurisprudence; Legal realism; Professionalization; Law; Sociology of law; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Legal pluralism; Political science; Monopolization; Sociology; Scholarship; Legal ethics; Legal education; Legal practice","score_opus":0.02940724315916582,"score_gpt":0.38592612886857025,"score_spread":0.35651888570940443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231824297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007516689,0.000899189,0.000016138967,0.025152164,0.003120513,0.00037459942,0.000016918008,0.000081867714,0.9702634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00537566,0.0068270466,0.000118039796,0.0005528995,0.0018479888,0.000032660944,0.000025879406,0.00008544024,0.98513436],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985383,0.00059010315,0.00020280959,0.00019004493,0.00021912844,0.00025958903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980815,0.00041537112,0.00083606754,0.0005243023,0.00010200855,0.000040763705],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009873154,0.0001416425,0.00026063097,0.00009769545,0.0006006506,0.000027844455,0.00079965335,0.0005499944,0.0059899283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011209416,0.00010146424,0.00008084651,0.000081616345,0.002300077,0.0001295901,0.00007463385,0.0006965825,0.0005703152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040483715,0.000031810672,0.00007446143,0.000014452912,0.000027553604,6.485394e-7,0.010173771,5.8013402e-8,0.0000016012423,0.1911246,0.7961974,0.0023495618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090715905,0.000013818686,0.000095810225,0.000045037734,0.000038284514,4.4082324e-7,0.003313341,2.1164534e-7,0.0000011081099,0.0045914752,0.9916931,0.00011666812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015415847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025340607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19549567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042601547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015365691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231824399","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2008.11423916","title":"Regulating Dignity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.24912371215290088,"score_gpt":0.46441122281974523,"score_spread":0.21528751066684435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231824399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05125644,0.000021571139,0.000463744,0.22803569,0.0007260885,0.00007776378,0.000001407976,0.00012712716,0.7192902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685618,0.000041344505,0.00176619,0.0054148985,0.00047842588,0.000004627964,0.0000035392256,0.000005213364,0.02372394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894106,0.00028595846,0.00012857532,0.00009836666,0.0003884528,0.00015755455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986099,0.0008199101,0.00007128314,0.00011776411,0.00031151142,0.00006965912],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013313444,0.0000436802,0.000051531795,0.00003691258,0.0019432565,0.00010401386,0.000120250545,0.00015713999,0.00032445183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073162965,0.00004598442,0.000026174532,0.00046024058,0.0003270315,0.0007812709,0.000015077531,0.0011858294,0.00016543854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022875054,0.000032138996,0.0013511975,0.0000029739058,0.000003507239,0.0000024125402,0.07207628,0.0000049675405,0.00004530516,0.9170027,0.008720348,0.00075590546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050290117,0.0000053250465,0.0025304763,0.0000045611732,0.000002726871,0.0000039991432,0.0031749837,0.000010552579,0.00008916358,0.004425854,0.9896307,0.00007134383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013876201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028927962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98091036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056489727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020292602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231885791","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4263","title":"‘Writing separately’","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Political science; Law; Concurrence; Variety (cybernetics); First amendment; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.04536705882565019,"score_gpt":0.3641999661543541,"score_spread":0.31883290732870395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231885791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016427958,0.00005732467,0.000109072644,0.014017218,0.00037059502,0.000022620614,0.00000144258,0.0000075063485,0.9689863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99159235,0.00012204297,0.0012833382,0.000080927086,0.00020796004,7.0529182e-9,2.9501658e-7,0.0000013024389,0.00671176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959975,0.00006389742,0.0000595597,0.00004134588,0.0001442116,0.000091253416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999297,0.00003901029,0.00024841636,0.00010175245,0.00023889866,0.00007490594],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005012048,0.000024812178,0.00004871472,0.000007012505,0.0047199884,0.0002150552,0.00032389167,0.00003298272,0.0040416704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015139882,0.000029747453,0.000035845896,0.000009532691,0.00024024073,0.0022991728,0.000024573734,0.00014072903,0.000020660616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017629773,0.00004740167,0.0023783364,0.0000020211967,0.000020898638,0.000010949153,0.024135346,0.0000018061556,0.000057785477,0.9523371,0.013993884,0.0069968808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014687044,0.000009108204,0.005787109,0.0000074760655,0.000010163964,0.0000036674585,0.03353925,0.0000035264763,0.000009963418,0.00070072187,0.95974267,0.000039473707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3125506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3448733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9751644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014533615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026488796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232100061","doi":"10.7202/1055473ar","title":"Liberal Education, Entrepreneurship, and the Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theatre Research in Canada","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Law; Political science; Legal education; Liberal education; Sociology; Higher education; Liberal arts education","score_opus":0.052682465448944275,"score_gpt":0.40817723820248186,"score_spread":0.3554947727535376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232100061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101870045,0.00016581269,4.336646e-8,0.22037995,0.00031739564,0.00025602727,0.0000013539843,0.000003902403,0.67700547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942062,0.000098335666,0.0000123879145,0.0019561239,0.00013796831,0.00003338152,0.000002011082,0.0000036468894,0.003549946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981654,0.0008867375,0.00010104433,0.000115194074,0.00048266188,0.00024894034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980261,0.0015595076,0.000021147358,0.00018531538,0.00012270284,0.00008527833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023228994,0.000034716686,0.000057380606,0.00005545341,0.00033504868,0.00014959462,0.00020364398,0.000020678652,0.000706012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008624767,0.000025436248,0.0000075744138,0.000599778,0.0002868286,0.0002335595,0.000030352841,0.0004109899,0.000036322825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025000852,0.000024251969,0.033334486,0.0000070523547,0.000004218638,6.7635887e-7,0.0059346664,0.0000023299144,0.000003057486,0.90847063,0.025458328,0.02673528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019896666,0.0000036055396,0.0015720378,0.000012022569,9.999816e-7,9.0778883e-7,0.028582534,0.000006203507,0.0000076864935,0.027160559,0.9424141,0.000040388288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91695577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004657902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01834849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232384133","doi":"10.1177/229255030201000502","title":"Doctors and Lawyers are Different","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Plastic Surgery","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Medical physics","score_opus":0.07612676150925364,"score_gpt":0.28698209329221136,"score_spread":0.21085533178295773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232384133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97199315,0.00040086432,0.000021361677,0.016298613,0.0045664245,0.000022592954,0.000006221879,0.000004295757,0.006686499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985782,0.00008053027,0.000009750377,0.00032838603,0.00035841952,4.9322716e-7,3.830959e-7,0.000003765311,0.00064005924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935114,0.00009105655,0.00020128312,0.00004662251,0.00013587181,0.00017401378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966657,0.0024118442,0.00019719418,0.000038623057,0.00015398541,0.0005326417],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003672255,0.0000469389,0.00010839614,0.0002885711,0.00031219498,0.00015864152,0.000059496375,0.000039348193,0.0024355545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006611731,0.000042423937,0.000047102625,0.00023648316,0.00013805175,0.00030967887,0.000001544714,0.00018811671,0.000018664367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031061797,0.000024571445,0.7067312,0.000006994138,0.000042064727,0.00007376721,0.008993611,0.0000057025277,0.00000390291,0.0073271533,0.27262297,0.004164948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064096894,0.000008289751,0.26091972,0.00005160484,0.000022821045,0.000019360861,0.006433078,0.000008209232,0.0000024280507,0.00019164561,0.73218524,0.0000935075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008975989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06964009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45956227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110987574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087984325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233369333","doi":"10.26226/morressier.5885d713d462b8028d8924d2","title":"Evaluation of a Court Liaison and Diversion Service in London over a Quarter of a Century","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Service (business); Law; Political science; History; Business; Archaeology; Marketing","score_opus":0.09391309181875272,"score_gpt":0.4316643544190195,"score_spread":0.3377512626002668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233369333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8745813,0.00024567608,0.000016611722,0.025048729,0.00066624756,0.000586791,0.000016863096,0.0000093038025,0.09882849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912614,0.00027434944,0.000179628,0.00014833234,0.000051302042,0.000014642944,0.000016434364,0.000002973042,0.00018620612],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847245,0.0003402775,0.0002341824,0.0001605035,0.0007098841,0.000082686696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795544,0.00012255069,0.00049468706,0.00022723543,0.0011692549,0.000030839277],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031921184,0.00006795966,0.00014819986,0.0001508579,0.00010698579,0.000071145616,0.00017027593,0.00017915809,0.0009553683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000843061,0.000066626104,0.000026605965,0.00015171988,0.0000748537,0.0003819807,0.00011297756,0.0002581206,0.000004291835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027105864,0.0019090634,0.1790426,0.0010950206,0.00025319547,0.0000012357422,0.6264594,0.00025909,0.0010100785,0.07451534,0.03508189,0.08010204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038325829,0.000118777236,0.6827578,0.00144809,0.00083024957,7.663065e-7,0.08930784,0.011414555,0.0003939058,0.03738078,0.17173053,0.0007841592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.087634705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0233854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5371516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011682402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014423338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234984341","doi":"10.1002/9781118929803.ewac0462","title":"Sexual Discrimination in the Legal Profession","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Women and Crime","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationality; Covert; Ethnic group; Legal profession; Political science; Law; Sexual discrimination; Phenomenon; Gender studies; Criminology; Sociology; Immigration","score_opus":0.02294291360434003,"score_gpt":0.3512204581601392,"score_spread":0.32827754455579916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234984341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008936445,0.00019336984,0.000002222417,0.016223168,0.00059991074,0.0004125386,0.000005517108,0.00001636672,0.97361046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.091132574,0.0005543981,0.000016209247,0.0005025887,0.00045112675,0.000055456854,0.000009612597,0.000028452278,0.90724957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989174,0.00038276153,0.00014458751,0.00011081676,0.0002707362,0.00017368418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934715,0.00023867488,0.00017587749,0.00018535924,0.000028302002,0.000024636549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012789223,0.00008124909,0.00011359491,0.00009663244,0.00013744742,0.000052479452,0.00026017576,0.00010319327,0.0007011571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026079142,0.000045429526,0.000012160746,0.00026026982,0.00016713825,0.00016282944,0.000025385702,0.00030761762,0.000051402214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009724958,0.000103940496,0.00026178797,0.000053363037,0.000010867391,4.3049658e-7,0.2944726,5.9168382e-8,0.0000046298137,0.21331365,0.48291713,0.008851777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007651193,0.000018631827,0.0012430911,0.000021264503,0.000008637754,3.1411446e-7,0.12018012,4.2961864e-7,2.9213098e-7,0.0008057914,0.8775857,0.00005922368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009376132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016228105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39466855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053953543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043725054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235480865","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-947-2.ch132","title":"Courts on the Web in Russia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Electronic Government","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Skepticism; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.02764223749378327,"score_gpt":0.2923313720353034,"score_spread":0.26468913454152015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235480865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031259237,0.00030233842,9.587326e-7,0.09387664,0.00027900646,0.0002941544,0.000008821109,0.000019716477,0.9049058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25563133,0.0033654603,0.0000035687747,0.0030689545,0.00032401946,0.000031021576,0.000004471148,0.000017522056,0.73755366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981876,0.000066129505,0.00019906583,0.00019650577,0.0010184648,0.00033224522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999185,0.00030877933,0.00020184254,0.00023764024,0.000025103158,0.000041582458],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061332143,0.00013984481,0.00011794737,0.000030775078,0.00034906334,0.00006335663,0.00025057586,0.00015075607,0.0045445086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015649073,0.000110324036,0.000057228626,0.000054927063,0.00011239577,0.00009183337,0.000019040854,0.0010572753,0.00052336184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070905126,0.00003118395,0.000005578207,7.7089106e-7,0.000015978652,0.0000022545535,0.0014569041,0.0000010477827,0.0000015964481,0.86670715,0.13048698,0.0012834655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008045274,0.000038377955,0.00006486808,0.000022761424,0.000008117822,0.0000011023484,0.0002535373,0.000002328794,0.0000057959924,0.009220708,0.9901761,0.00012588719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003513375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040082536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8596891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030523615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026447384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235664638","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500011550","title":"Welcome Message of the Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, P.C., Chief Justice of Canada: International Association of Law Librarians Conference - October 1, 2012 - Toronto, Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Association (psychology); Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.013077344118704938,"score_gpt":0.27356107550085756,"score_spread":0.26048373138215264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235664638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10330634,0.00006147836,0.0010408405,0.07586845,0.01336823,0.00039700462,0.00015816218,0.000012012113,0.8057875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914707,0.000040426177,0.0005557017,0.00088015123,0.00032614643,0.0000045029547,0.000027736154,0.000004503481,0.006690123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968506,0.0001469323,0.0012309335,0.000058564772,0.0015571609,0.0001558067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918478,0.00032532474,0.0030313178,0.00012317968,0.0045967107,0.00007563451],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010102674,0.00010255845,0.00021023989,0.00012077882,0.00015711538,0.00023091091,0.00083077984,0.00010813146,0.0060029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009801686,0.0000836909,0.000115834155,0.0001658543,0.00011183666,0.013299827,0.000058304337,0.00036484492,0.0000066531093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105789804,0.0002768012,0.009025683,0.0000338015,0.00052414415,8.446756e-7,0.02682116,0.0006858182,0.00043050063,0.8478882,0.11301685,0.0011904216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008238069,0.00004925871,0.058107007,0.00012899711,0.000087065964,0.0000125962315,0.004909081,0.00023037694,0.001744093,0.0020500144,0.9317029,0.00015478837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8463958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82621956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8881644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014641273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005071945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99490577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235839321","doi":"10.1002/9781118968888.index","title":"Index","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09824020529357748,"score_gpt":0.4821947478352278,"score_spread":0.38395454254165035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235839321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003547569,0.00007812221,0.00012048732,0.0671909,0.0081103295,0.00009668813,0.000007937661,0.000020907244,0.92437106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010848798,0.00034644117,0.000078037614,0.001622876,0.0021624938,0.000014099121,0.000048603164,0.000007077183,0.98487157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934566,0.00007617342,0.00010102121,0.000119273034,0.0002178276,0.0001400691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991685,0.00010000395,0.00019437665,0.00026848257,0.00020705875,0.00006155971],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036797635,0.000063975356,0.000086628206,0.000073108626,0.001138065,0.0007308554,0.00037513836,0.00024398965,0.17246215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007277893,0.000060789433,0.000033341887,0.00009756937,0.00015383784,0.00045921715,0.000020616451,0.00044959612,0.07923086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.2368955e-7,0.000011721238,0.000013475238,0.0000022988038,0.000006653527,1.3106256e-7,0.0014282698,1.4221087e-7,1.4512237e-7,0.053940374,0.9413071,0.0032891468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024384131,0.0000016191367,0.00005094751,0.0000071063787,0.0000037745986,1.0658042e-7,0.0008520404,3.504541e-7,9.909531e-7,0.00036613044,0.9986042,0.000088371904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03575059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055951294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09323129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066153356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032599203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9706704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235996708","doi":"10.1350/pojo.2010.83.1.488","title":"Suing Detectives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Intervention (counseling); Position (finance); Law; Political science; Criminology; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.05324434837645715,"score_gpt":0.4050540569927925,"score_spread":0.35180970861633537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235996708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47139606,0.0001764914,0.0002398997,0.15109356,0.0010619478,0.00012864122,0.0000013931029,0.00004327226,0.37585872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865031,0.0008368357,0.0014652474,0.0047309343,0.0018724967,0.0000061318524,2.4289736e-7,0.000010790404,0.0045741773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799544,0.0011931236,0.00020893704,0.000097590404,0.00026080484,0.00024409432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934169,0.00557762,0.00035753506,0.00018380767,0.00030923987,0.00015486818],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009810685,0.00008269984,0.00007791997,0.00008192168,0.0026644298,0.0008672243,0.00030238304,0.0000714149,0.00055430806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012660726,0.0000564953,0.000037525162,0.0002903994,0.00040272597,0.0021926162,0.00004908626,0.0015391579,0.00006398478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054148957,0.000041498395,0.0001258499,0.0000015661441,0.000034854034,0.0000011011274,0.09089822,0.000002311608,0.0011023178,0.89003843,0.00028078284,0.017418936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086624845,0.000015783262,0.00090001547,0.0000051663583,0.00005146247,0.0002469218,0.08346185,0.0000066179873,0.00014058864,0.037437245,0.877565,0.00008270989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001957896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018229763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8772842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002496042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054423057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236122237","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.142","title":"Becoming an Ethical Scholarly Writer","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Identity (music); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Socialization; Ethical code; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Computer science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08999703686101351,"score_gpt":0.41159696758955183,"score_spread":0.3215999307285383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236122237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5542726,0.000043580803,0.00031431127,0.39280173,0.003561467,0.000058298818,0.0000019257204,0.000032309406,0.04891379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551204,0.000015813375,0.024798915,0.014902224,0.0040909164,0.0000016190481,0.0000026848684,0.00001578298,0.0010516851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677056,0.00062575546,0.0006559924,0.00015855551,0.0014770258,0.0003121314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920324,0.00069117325,0.00072867406,0.00025588932,0.005753571,0.00053827243],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022050813,0.000098045406,0.00016658663,0.0005325635,0.0012121529,0.13657412,0.001274445,0.0007031452,0.0011439935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07828744,0.000091225884,0.000099621626,0.0009842808,0.00014582113,0.35219327,0.000059628295,0.017334275,0.000032596396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005501218,0.00044977848,0.0601469,0.000009151124,0.000073518444,0.000035816254,0.09074011,0.0000036680574,0.019778717,0.71394753,0.060446557,0.05431324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035597078,0.000052038296,0.02072006,0.000025311228,0.000023097151,0.00005454923,0.017553901,0.000007485495,0.0000740315,0.01234253,0.948647,0.00014398487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013517785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014065847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88820046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000122847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024971347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236313526","doi":"10.29173/alr227","title":"Forty Years of the Alberta Law Reform Institute &amp;mdash; Past, Present, Future","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Join (topology); Law; Political science; Law reform; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04186230200847783,"score_gpt":0.3718299820779953,"score_spread":0.32996768006951743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236313526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056000927,0.0032215475,0.0000014473358,0.25935566,0.000750619,0.00049534225,0.0000027352485,0.000011463591,0.7356012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5964645,0.045441933,0.0011382252,0.18110801,0.00551357,0.0001609983,0.00014761803,0.00005303643,0.16997206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865335,0.0001868174,0.0003967753,0.00018665273,0.00034361923,0.00023277239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864906,0.00021044785,0.00030118675,0.0005850792,0.00016551217,0.00008872421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053733937,0.00011196592,0.0002335288,0.000016359809,0.00042344985,0.000073296964,0.00052025623,0.000090858186,0.00063626166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035814542,0.000079056525,0.00015113117,0.0007888809,0.0002759201,0.0009194756,0.00003940583,0.00028446916,0.00018358577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017941645,0.00006478814,0.00007021085,0.00007474129,0.000014841731,1.1984807e-7,0.0016168378,2.051038e-7,0.000002720447,0.95284384,0.037790246,0.0075196214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069625385,0.000009387188,0.0008332592,0.00035047028,0.0000575377,0.000002417653,0.000080120684,1.275782e-7,0.000004849261,0.0018533247,0.99663407,0.00010484339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22085445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43460333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95884377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008369773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030271354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78433394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236686839","doi":"10.2307/3504589","title":"10.2307/3504589","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Morality; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.019446056403923943,"score_gpt":0.3028405750570526,"score_spread":0.28339451865312865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236686839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041473695,0.000007753683,3.7821448e-7,0.034200564,0.000008563419,0.000090225745,0.0000026607343,0.00008075254,0.96519434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014594152,4.5650708e-7,0.00013549799,0.0007100964,0.00025170457,0.000011281156,0.0000051881802,0.0000048392576,0.9974215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994607,0.0000674069,0.00008680015,0.00008838291,0.00015551549,0.0001411874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996088,0.00008998239,0.000019395078,0.00010792944,0.00007881781,0.000095062394],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029366362,0.000038841983,0.000043988883,0.000043011085,0.00030161187,0.00012177442,0.00013057771,0.0000338226,0.99849313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002964381,0.000040958377,0.000017418388,0.0004949984,0.00004028472,0.0003158212,0.00000599312,0.00008600919,0.9882736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064585233,0.000032755797,3.404263e-7,3.571585e-7,0.0000027934086,2.8791266e-7,0.00080371025,0.000003661881,0.0000042515917,0.000511483,0.53401417,0.46461976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035501653,0.000013314133,0.000042715496,0.000001833218,0.0000035665869,3.5195356e-7,0.00004355768,0.0000032462563,0.0000036377755,0.00004095882,0.99975085,0.000060457263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010713874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000082027445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46573672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038444894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024983837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23197852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237098895","doi":"10.1017/9780511782480.033","title":"XXVII","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Instinct; Quarter (Canadian coin); Art; Art history; History; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0437567250794966,"score_gpt":0.4214230692774201,"score_spread":0.37766634419792355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237098895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.6624475e-8,0.00004584959,0.000038736012,0.030859256,0.0015541519,0.000113225346,0.0000027796536,0.00015743493,0.9672285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007510445,0.000068095134,0.00044273256,0.0018176247,0.00073543616,0.0000040638515,0.0000059347744,0.000054526696,0.9967965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996525,0.000038099068,0.000042847903,0.00007010717,0.00012322112,0.00007321905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973917,0.00004286087,0.000057782578,0.00010989158,0.000025174435,0.000025091773],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013071891,0.000036028752,0.000045638302,0.00007915172,0.00005722789,0.00007105578,0.00009783835,0.00011968862,0.1213841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015112698,0.000033166223,0.000015280348,0.00015819045,0.000037136837,0.00006517711,0.0000057437123,0.00012339177,0.016709156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.7651047e-8,0.0000051627244,0.00000921665,0.0000012018119,0.000002913706,3.2083943e-8,0.00042365064,2.6661098e-9,1.0512e-7,0.36557886,0.6332267,0.00075209106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017872728,0.0000010782173,0.0000037187444,0.0000049353916,0.0000028686093,3.336499e-8,0.0010326066,6.5772575e-8,2.2079998e-7,0.00016841182,0.998717,0.00005118047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027957486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00756459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3654903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020044556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006454176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237512605","doi":"10.17118/11143/11825","title":"Revue de droit. Université de Sherbrooke. Volume 37 - Numéro 1","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.013913433986965784,"score_gpt":0.24747769324877442,"score_spread":0.23356425926180863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237512605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04556766,0.0028733895,0.0038564748,0.020421918,0.003298556,0.00089674775,0.00036623664,0.00028600628,0.922433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023591232,0.004314774,0.0032132228,0.0017654216,0.004147899,0.000021879205,0.0006854747,0.00019053656,0.9620696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934613,0.0009257951,0.00095293426,0.0014418167,0.00070366706,0.0025144909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488163,0.0007958995,0.0011617455,0.0012017799,0.0006811407,0.0012777759],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016065254,0.0009549968,0.0011033195,0.000687295,0.003219551,0.00046817653,0.002178969,0.0022660661,0.03108732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044733778,0.0015417172,0.00081870664,0.0028884213,0.000905113,0.0014406752,0.0005184795,0.0027812722,0.009507959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028092257,0.000615578,0.01074593,0.0010545778,0.0004843186,0.0009668538,0.019048588,0.0055405856,0.0011115824,0.30159688,0.6555981,0.0029560719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001106793,0.00014791453,0.0048949365,0.0009165847,0.0007780838,0.0005233003,0.0048585613,0.0020297817,0.00032003477,0.004113337,0.9787574,0.001553318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032259125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029362455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32315925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052459605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056772074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238836132","doi":"10.22215/etd/2000-04553","title":"Restorative injustice? The boundaries of restorative justice at the intersections of gender, race and class, a Canadian focus.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Injustice; Race (biology); Class (philosophy); Criminology; Environmental justice; Gender studies; Focus (optics); Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.0454704338678897,"score_gpt":0.3790856291582946,"score_spread":0.3336151952904049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238836132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057143275,0.0012258512,0.00002554511,0.050776035,0.0027818398,0.000887274,0.00018676618,0.000023428169,0.88695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9019916,0.0005249592,0.000073657735,0.00044495802,0.00021890069,0.00006390938,0.00012979859,0.000014437939,0.0965378],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982909,0.0005625617,0.00039084413,0.00019617533,0.00036035397,0.00019916143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707747,0.0011500668,0.00052301714,0.00026413394,0.0008887789,0.00009653421],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007976305,0.00014991568,0.00020092873,0.00019339846,0.0031046506,0.00028058048,0.00027727048,0.00021058958,0.0016075002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021866714,0.00009925196,0.00005347285,0.0009128685,0.0013703791,0.0004390089,0.000015981794,0.00059718353,0.00001735185],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013469822,0.000032709264,0.00007492943,0.000044805005,0.000089979134,4.2240478e-7,0.5540044,0.0000049645296,0.00002531118,0.29109663,0.15351099,0.0009801807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005452542,0.000025906429,0.0015810785,0.000023045293,0.00023624515,7.983922e-7,0.44648817,0.00000402783,0.00006806032,0.0015282175,0.5499033,0.000086661224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6866494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8448483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003842578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239021314","doi":"10.1002/asi.20902","title":"The law of libraries and archives","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Citation; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; History","score_opus":0.02269206996373028,"score_gpt":0.32537037233510224,"score_spread":0.30267830237137194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239021314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69824886,0.00017578546,0.0006638746,0.28908533,0.00025676793,0.00017559025,0.0000032598764,0.000014834722,0.011375708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99392414,0.00086463674,0.0036140708,0.0014954634,0.000023073671,0.000002355927,5.7353148e-8,7.4486644e-7,0.000075475466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994487,0.000013749304,0.00020175158,0.000024872255,0.00021943204,0.00009145446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986025,0.00032079965,0.00064971106,0.00007125112,0.00033195066,0.000023791546],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077073084,0.000025811003,0.00006623885,0.00007290723,0.0020808626,0.00009439921,0.00030920477,0.000016348937,6.0292257e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009770339,0.000014266348,0.00003950058,0.0012516802,0.011213182,0.002053743,0.00004860843,0.00013000832,1.2971698e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007977591,0.0000061249807,0.0014604818,0.0000023604293,0.000010092514,9.793176e-9,0.026022956,5.7082497e-7,0.00032491906,0.9403648,0.0020741874,0.029725544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001095017,0.00007644769,0.0032019303,0.000005284703,0.000007943022,0.000027523749,0.119621895,0.000046991907,0.0009420342,0.020153213,0.8557736,0.000033618264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045374225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054019924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92021155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010015377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075915456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239564217","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-933-5.ch151","title":"Knowledge Sharing in Legal Practice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Knowledge management; Business; Knowledge sharing; Legal practice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.06672729024993052,"score_gpt":0.3850507781667672,"score_spread":0.3183234879168367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239564217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000035951703,0.00047245243,0.000007413322,0.0059469924,0.001325602,0.0003112469,0.000017973021,0.000111010464,0.99177134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09909118,0.000098252895,0.00046486396,0.0022594305,0.0012331628,0.000024118295,0.0000057660577,0.000032822845,0.8967904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983403,0.00007585466,0.00041799335,0.00040299847,0.00042210988,0.000340745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985412,0.00026122582,0.0003177756,0.00031977324,0.00041072658,0.00014931806],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006142248,0.00022608973,0.00024474243,0.0001389853,0.00044128267,0.0003046289,0.00042837427,0.00042724688,0.00031687174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010397818,0.00026518275,0.00009553046,0.00011019321,0.00022207094,0.00064529915,0.000094840136,0.0009085817,0.0010855887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014439494,0.000034402856,0.000020820064,0.00000617969,0.000023188655,0.000046556393,0.004865312,5.1693087e-7,3.499064e-7,0.9601274,0.03120054,0.0036602747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014006089,0.000013297281,0.000027710626,0.000070684684,0.000026311143,0.000027820903,0.0006479767,0.0000014305342,6.6778864e-7,0.048179727,0.95060015,0.0002641444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01107536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016277391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9193996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009014883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034482225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239632767","doi":"10.1353/ctr.0.0022","title":"\"My Passion, My World\": An Interview with Derrick Chua","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; Art; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04710449569946656,"score_gpt":0.36548456116280936,"score_spread":0.3183800654633428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239632767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004896517,0.01502368,0.000012654632,0.42209375,0.00072246685,0.0005730878,0.000011504237,0.000057056357,0.56101614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6036826,0.062425233,0.002690835,0.29035544,0.0025219545,0.0004061,0.00017222324,0.00010307364,0.03764259],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987687,0.00031777407,0.00021564044,0.00019836274,0.00017447794,0.00032505198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984667,0.00007925989,0.000106415464,0.00038788584,0.0002259739,0.00073377317],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011789654,0.000110772686,0.00018120701,0.00014218004,0.0005543566,0.0001680395,0.0003412661,0.00005490849,0.009618631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002449686,0.000085353924,0.000047421792,0.0012881669,0.00014248287,0.00059676066,0.000007475978,0.00046796497,0.00042843795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.310979e-7,0.00003730248,0.0010711586,0.00022992057,0.000016906655,0.0000072085163,0.0020615605,5.128615e-8,0.0000024757649,0.08711659,0.2094415,0.7000145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003408866,0.000010872818,0.00054595456,0.0006295236,0.00003363226,0.000006619152,0.00047561488,4.852431e-7,0.0000014858172,0.00034026918,0.9977867,0.00013473247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17197107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9561983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7883452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106219435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004107237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239760779","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_352","title":"Colt Foundation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05329014870948413,"score_gpt":0.3412449433596988,"score_spread":0.2879547946502147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239760779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000040647075,0.000060569346,0.00009175499,0.002145156,0.0017786704,0.0004876356,0.000025309075,0.00013961381,0.9952306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69428426,0.000059268245,0.00026178593,0.0010729496,0.0019751643,0.00002431151,0.00009756194,0.000041984764,0.30218273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829006,0.000103037004,0.00038311616,0.00035956808,0.00055780547,0.0003063899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980561,0.00030946315,0.00041855016,0.00040651148,0.00064549985,0.00016387833],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008974705,0.00024906915,0.00023156087,0.0002362935,0.00079809065,0.0003486965,0.0003312995,0.0003912454,0.025014004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004430512,0.0002693537,0.00011946049,0.000050341627,0.0005454156,0.0000032509463,0.00005127846,0.00044289706,0.004853857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011573457,2.986461e-7,0.000015234572,0.000007881421,0.000042203104,0.0000024010926,0.005836316,2.2328255e-8,0.000008766278,0.98344517,0.0022141782,0.008415967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060660444,0.000017334942,0.000024083398,0.000023429671,0.000029280416,0.0000012806056,0.00029963796,4.3934295e-7,0.000007436569,0.50923246,0.49012187,0.00018209031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011410028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047354735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6942436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023834131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00128395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239885959","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_338","title":"City University, London","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Optometrists; Camargo Foundation; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Royal Academy of Engineering; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.04856272742491469,"score_gpt":0.3069093253292261,"score_spread":0.2583465979043114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239885959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008626832,0.000068749585,0.0000421604,0.0018606699,0.0009962079,0.0003102665,0.000062973944,0.00013073982,0.99644196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6093384,0.0000922906,0.00017112742,0.00046522912,0.00087979226,0.0000011447142,0.00003276568,0.000023635514,0.3889956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858344,0.00008615908,0.00022060469,0.00035400796,0.00045413966,0.00030165332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984416,0.00019881103,0.00030522473,0.00039063185,0.00046796963,0.00019576574],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047441619,0.00023096288,0.00022703395,0.00026187484,0.00076812744,0.00015158442,0.0004500691,0.00039983087,0.016389638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014987143,0.00026398056,0.00014062248,0.00005813452,0.00063165696,0.000002858509,0.00010254409,0.0005116201,0.0014948379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012570554,3.545441e-7,0.000054325625,0.000006243142,0.00004661226,0.000011723687,0.00404492,1.6727435e-8,0.0000035443059,0.9902432,0.0021344651,0.0034420302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077324374,0.000015953523,0.000039959257,0.000021796885,0.00003574583,0.0000014343702,0.000430718,2.475499e-7,0.0000055918886,0.45325375,0.5459264,0.00019108823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026922224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009381851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60925215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025964974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010859636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239951440","doi":"10.1080/03050710601179150","title":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030102616585432868,"score_gpt":0.3454846624718732,"score_spread":0.31538204588644037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239951440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016161415,0.0002828461,0.000068591595,0.3971652,0.00078400405,0.00037181168,0.000019781302,0.00027033308,0.59942126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9213623,0.00009409189,0.00245158,0.051776234,0.0013952107,0.00009857944,0.000113627146,0.000048967988,0.02265944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629956,0.0009825652,0.0007524724,0.00042943747,0.0006679016,0.0008680621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972427,0.000980881,0.00043148085,0.00061667035,0.00038241342,0.00034588098],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024436163,0.00025639505,0.00034119445,0.0000909547,0.0031239192,0.00050715933,0.0006725933,0.00024341246,0.010837107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029938418,0.00027652702,0.00011177005,0.0005863715,0.00086833944,0.000187603,0.00009722663,0.0009422291,0.005188651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014075394,0.00019436792,0.00024445585,0.000013832017,0.0000048939473,0.0000033035044,0.00079271797,0.00000505744,0.000003651447,0.5926698,0.4056665,0.00038736014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041367684,0.000045181543,0.00058658555,0.00002887878,0.000015437938,0.0000044252524,0.001289985,0.0000027756714,0.00002869598,0.009392788,0.9878863,0.0003052741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3409579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07759669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9197461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032632568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059753313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240113442","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511807268.020","title":"The condition of India (cont.): lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03380778294117588,"score_gpt":0.2823726376980244,"score_spread":0.24856485475684853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240113442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005318569,0.000058805897,0.00001629563,0.0011743017,0.00036775743,0.00028034172,0.00008183864,0.000044803062,0.99792266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008812265,0.00022102312,0.000020690248,0.00019925256,0.00015334634,4.156856e-7,0.000033198594,0.0000088603165,0.99055094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991455,0.0000926115,0.00016110575,0.00016012946,0.00028344762,0.00015721991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986057,0.00029688058,0.00040347892,0.00024683378,0.0003666107,0.00008048994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003295682,0.00011728285,0.00014369703,0.00009701381,0.00082765997,0.000084374056,0.00037446976,0.00023046182,0.000021642772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009431615,0.000119381846,0.0000983676,0.000019485444,0.0006014288,0.00020269286,0.00003842297,0.00043990955,0.000014588854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001792614,0.000005747886,0.0000011862098,0.000005011852,0.000038457412,0.0000047349236,0.0006357012,1.6831925e-7,0.0000049089913,0.91579413,0.079887815,0.0036042247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013256661,0.000016911345,0.00005806974,0.000030402869,0.00007289661,6.0925146e-7,0.0008463481,5.6959146e-7,0.0000326644,0.00018163463,0.9985008,0.00012651128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017250868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010854065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.918613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017644535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000749466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63657755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241807468","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-71363-8_8","title":"The Art of Limitations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Innovation and change in professional education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Section (typography); Process (computing); Confession (law); Computer science; Reflection (computer programming); Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Limit (mathematics); Management science; Engineering; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.1849938744307432,"score_gpt":0.4426452510597949,"score_spread":0.2576513766290517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241807468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012210488,0.0013247626,0.000005785512,0.1595025,0.006168554,0.0006370182,0.000013003726,0.000019828363,0.8311075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042118948,0.0022468274,0.0001904637,0.0027673717,0.00077236915,0.0002370279,0.00041597767,0.000018739893,0.95123225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861884,0.000106096864,0.00055887253,0.0001901885,0.00039476747,0.00013125416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969455,0.00066478906,0.0005664437,0.00017662391,0.0016118068,0.00003484022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010034667,0.00012077976,0.00013893023,0.00040521068,0.0005445086,0.00009519504,0.00012779486,0.0002554809,0.0005829824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012293078,0.00010697566,0.000027498625,0.00063928193,0.0002493742,0.00042839767,0.000033866247,0.00054398115,0.000029881856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059093986,0.00007152636,0.00014235107,0.000018449819,0.000008389092,1.3393633e-7,0.008326886,4.060169e-8,0.000009803799,0.8842619,0.03183003,0.07532457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006502672,0.000007784406,0.0024709066,0.0002745498,0.000009760601,8.9367387e-7,0.006313206,0.000001926182,0.0000056003346,0.0595553,0.9311865,0.00010856544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032152896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029877035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8993564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013111539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040087043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7111269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242091045","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.34460","title":"Shapiro, Dr Bernard Jack, (born 8 June 1935), Principal and Vice-Chancellor, McGill University, Montreal, 1994–2002, now Emeritus; first Ethics Commissioner of Canada, 2004–07","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Library science; Political science; Management; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.05378179675263731,"score_gpt":0.3253405078704006,"score_spread":0.27155871111776325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242091045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007560128,0.002276362,0.000027355523,0.09103852,0.002795745,0.00055263477,0.0016454781,0.0000656233,0.90084225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035997864,0.057979595,0.00021532044,0.0018233254,0.0007428851,0.0000062273084,0.0002277744,0.000049759194,0.9353553],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641824,0.00036710702,0.0005981155,0.0005786826,0.0013530436,0.0006848055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637777,0.0010544322,0.0008126828,0.00047851237,0.00075615715,0.0005204607],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012455515,0.0004013037,0.00065282866,0.0003165203,0.0020840291,0.000099535624,0.00069587154,0.0010143413,0.0027518938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075483945,0.00042806426,0.000113056245,0.0010179112,0.0004928762,0.000520099,0.0002124266,0.002349921,0.000034678164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048416026,0.00015699374,0.00046421555,0.00024937716,0.00011129835,0.000029323932,0.007046982,0.0000083820605,6.8327114e-7,0.008051752,0.98125905,0.0025735227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039760896,0.000030042975,0.0013859413,0.00052419445,0.00011830144,0.0000031676864,0.0041882102,0.000018126131,0.000008486225,0.00014972064,0.9927138,0.0004623732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87116104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98848057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117319494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001001053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007122539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242163558","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3930191","title":"Gender and Racial Diversity of Counsel at the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Diversity (politics); Law; Political science; Affirmative action; Gender diversity; Right to counsel; Racial diversity; Ethnic group; Corporate governance; Economics","score_opus":0.05340017718392431,"score_gpt":0.3657747972294521,"score_spread":0.3123746200455278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242163558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98387915,0.00041787492,0.00005047825,0.012384821,0.00018506007,0.00006823463,0.000003922215,0.000002231799,0.003008212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979514,0.0002929892,0.0000074462823,0.00022806901,0.00011375918,5.0329277e-7,0.0000012344783,0.0000023763912,0.0014022166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848956,0.00038588923,0.00015966171,0.00007925082,0.0004618641,0.0004238011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913543,0.00014336065,0.00015016012,0.00008341113,0.00043139185,0.000056255678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023934208,0.000042064545,0.000086848726,0.000021573032,0.0011343986,0.000028143748,0.0001411916,0.000027833978,0.00022834748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032361757,0.00003337687,0.000020946572,0.0002487935,0.000111959635,0.00021571836,0.000049506318,0.00066496787,4.0648112e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120235374,0.0008476916,0.64247996,0.000005285681,0.00038419457,0.000007087183,0.20447789,0.000016350217,0.00019724434,0.14126036,0.008373244,0.0018304674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080398476,0.00022477559,0.25909618,0.0000031516854,0.00014802073,0.000073065115,0.6467477,0.000011527971,0.00008052676,0.029291084,0.06336878,0.00015119488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21891661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9632902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7443736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006559393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029137721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97636616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242397554","doi":"10.7202/rdus","title":"Revue de droit de l'Université de Sherbrooke","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.017799181236221682,"score_gpt":0.26225943354651604,"score_spread":0.24446025231029436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242397554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11188079,0.002203132,0.0045308312,0.017686551,0.0023120262,0.00079869386,0.00023167777,0.0002535378,0.8601028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039183,0.0071542216,0.006007601,0.0029717998,0.0042321496,0.00002427622,0.00030191764,0.00018828335,0.93993676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99365467,0.0009878651,0.00081251375,0.0013324758,0.0006077793,0.0026047225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99451315,0.00095162744,0.0010404051,0.0011997363,0.00072801876,0.0015670311],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002143205,0.00086333277,0.000983309,0.0007427815,0.0032145225,0.000433757,0.0023506337,0.0022178495,0.038833115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007191172,0.0013728983,0.00072741054,0.002405057,0.001068747,0.0012327182,0.0005867682,0.0024725725,0.011091195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005685624,0.00071071,0.011122376,0.0015325847,0.00084921054,0.0010949799,0.07241588,0.0018268782,0.0033909543,0.33849627,0.5626525,0.005339065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010907203,0.00020852144,0.0042249854,0.0011235211,0.0008824586,0.00074337935,0.006628214,0.001396638,0.0009646931,0.0050459555,0.97629285,0.0013980547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017383674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027962364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41364032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05324733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00686366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242489871","doi":"10.29173/alr332","title":"Introduction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographics; Legal profession; Diversity (politics); Theme (computing); Political science; Law; Legal service; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.05498208060460617,"score_gpt":0.37965972791507424,"score_spread":0.32467764731046805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242489871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021384035,0.0049781464,0.0000063922053,0.40075627,0.0005037757,0.00014344016,1.695729e-7,0.000019375955,0.5933786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29881844,0.27357697,0.001099163,0.12721059,0.006853463,0.000155945,0.0000639332,0.000026925956,0.29219458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937546,0.00015197926,0.0001398772,0.00009907855,0.00013362021,0.00009997456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947023,0.00015038018,0.00006545675,0.0001508374,0.00011597938,0.000047125446],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039534605,0.000038745377,0.000080534315,0.000011475048,0.0005357897,0.000022077189,0.000088274515,0.000023525385,0.006343223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012267861,0.000035576184,0.000031737734,0.00041689753,0.00012715819,0.0005168511,0.0000061099367,0.000109880224,0.0019216324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.2897811e-7,0.000015961687,0.000037312646,0.000023312452,0.000002578063,1.6357276e-7,0.00063917146,2.5464972e-8,0.0000010985058,0.69749236,0.300393,0.0013947977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017776185,0.0000030932113,0.000060358903,0.000045218072,0.000010960215,0.000007041516,0.000034249748,1.02708505e-7,0.000003918351,0.00025446527,0.9995157,0.000047086258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036602322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009108826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6991227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030811578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021525002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242509207","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u178564","title":"Gale, Hon. George Alexander, (24 June 1906–25 July 1997), Chief Justice of Ontario, 1967–76; Vice-Chairman, Ontario Law Reform Commission, 1977–81","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Commission; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; History; Art history","score_opus":0.048726707385322594,"score_gpt":0.33813140129046126,"score_spread":0.2894046939051387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242509207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006560855,0.0017176225,0.000045982226,0.010747693,0.009460597,0.0008706566,0.000243216,0.00016315836,0.97609496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026758686,0.006080172,0.000673546,0.0030770986,0.0024079082,0.00006132926,0.0012620504,0.00009190248,0.9836701],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937696,0.0003569764,0.0016690649,0.00095412665,0.0020138526,0.0012363753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946445,0.0006214843,0.0016199416,0.0011877979,0.0012432077,0.00068304734],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021590127,0.00079624023,0.0012274256,0.00058417994,0.002069015,0.0004941206,0.0013725387,0.0014750154,0.011473627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054045307,0.0007527359,0.00037845748,0.0014000472,0.0007477524,0.0012943968,0.00025438317,0.004219374,0.0005430102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000964096,0.00052219635,0.00046778415,0.00035350292,0.00020070707,0.000016229491,0.043752704,0.0000019526258,0.0000014389365,0.089525975,0.86279273,0.002268352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006904466,0.000105870015,0.0019391874,0.0010725415,0.00053425,0.000011935011,0.0034063158,0.0000017964636,0.00002307517,0.0006654754,0.9906884,0.0008607478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9360684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12789561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006407203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017173361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242529280","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_369","title":"Council of American Overseas Research Centers (CAORC)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Political science; Library science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.1781886044545985,"score_gpt":0.39897900604039904,"score_spread":0.22079040158580054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242529280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022852691,0.000103309634,0.0000073005026,0.001483007,0.00075008953,0.00047235162,0.00011548758,0.00005492352,0.996785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8533347,0.00014697369,0.00018666881,0.00041730478,0.0008574641,0.00001712656,0.000024824332,0.00004539998,0.14496952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610424,0.00024821932,0.00047105126,0.00043765188,0.002220821,0.00051800464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488837,0.0006156166,0.0005501294,0.00060658396,0.0030945416,0.000244781],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027412134,0.00024564462,0.0003793988,0.00033669284,0.00061269803,0.00014579085,0.00056392536,0.0002386985,0.0058502755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011634893,0.0002555156,0.00016705773,0.00015092337,0.0031401953,0.0000030295248,0.00011290558,0.00080571044,0.00055074523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039761002,0.0000011546015,0.00009063115,0.00001929856,0.00008315473,0.000004534631,0.017017849,4.0244274e-8,0.00003216746,0.97439563,0.004533656,0.003782149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010657923,0.00008162356,0.00007229932,0.00006848789,0.00002781026,0.0000010468849,0.0031866927,6.262819e-7,0.000019873638,0.38163498,0.61459935,0.00020062938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016999006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012917119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8531062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011389416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074829874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243277603","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_275","title":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Legal Studies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.07047359099287602,"score_gpt":0.3701603249660598,"score_spread":0.29968673397318374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243277603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004372282,0.00052969164,0.000029076506,0.008140673,0.003634642,0.0009243662,0.00027901703,0.00007962665,0.9863392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71005017,0.00019912554,0.0012047084,0.002234045,0.0020841009,0.00013002721,0.00014583286,0.00005357758,0.2838984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983828,0.000033752753,0.00037631474,0.00040036553,0.00031814916,0.00048861146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777776,0.00022712018,0.00029002145,0.00035443142,0.0010224782,0.00032820157],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000536207,0.00029745433,0.00034153578,0.00034349953,0.0012914017,0.00020533595,0.00035760822,0.0003130191,0.0010749925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007273136,0.00030804213,0.0001501313,0.000046605604,0.0006608791,0.0000070904216,0.000036306294,0.00034790262,0.0003179697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012031094,1.773686e-7,0.00000490793,0.000020242918,0.00013271555,0.00000527773,0.006630392,2.2195802e-7,0.00000275604,0.9820593,0.003796519,0.007335476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010825728,0.000027049278,0.0000032353637,0.000043746255,0.000042819654,0.0000013601772,0.0010484379,2.9866706e-7,0.000006395746,0.43580437,0.5626913,0.00022274216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1035779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8882805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7847026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071618235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004541268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243305108","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_296","title":"Cardiff University","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Optometrists; Camargo Foundation; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Royal Academy of Engineering; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.04003638174879715,"score_gpt":0.29817909706663215,"score_spread":0.258142715317835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243305108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000043396874,0.00006924211,0.000026945323,0.0014816321,0.0010616734,0.0002742061,0.000071570095,0.00011871906,0.99685264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58174604,0.00006896721,0.00014367203,0.00033530316,0.0009320597,0.0000010834881,0.000026828988,0.000022578448,0.4167235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871355,0.00008656419,0.00019186533,0.00032271212,0.00040843475,0.00027688828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986017,0.00016997129,0.0002451218,0.00038642876,0.00041463686,0.00018219114],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040729935,0.00021083096,0.00022684483,0.0002141238,0.0007425279,0.00011737561,0.00037119738,0.00036407213,0.009683061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012380032,0.00023994083,0.00015661225,0.000045605084,0.0005792726,0.000002024703,0.000071333205,0.00044312218,0.0018191442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008571343,1.8955286e-7,0.00002124861,0.0000053431418,0.000059445098,0.000011036439,0.005557995,2.1897852e-8,0.0000028425372,0.98876005,0.0029836122,0.0025896437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006395784,0.000011710517,0.000032446547,0.000016850525,0.00004367475,0.0000012721628,0.00084706186,1.8676087e-7,0.000002903308,0.4083994,0.5903979,0.00018262734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023977605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5874143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024203259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010819379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243348423","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v47i3.188149","title":"Book review of \"Handbook of Canadian Higher Education Law\"","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05313510558727247,"score_gpt":0.3984988549737057,"score_spread":0.3453637493864332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243348423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008111989,0.28726533,0.0000012971905,0.26748088,0.0102224955,0.00030097543,0.000020977644,0.0000034451273,0.43389338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55637485,0.01822425,0.0008167064,0.08270236,0.0030520584,0.000027558308,0.000040172155,0.000033722943,0.33872834],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867374,0.00015188921,0.00056758366,0.00010188745,0.0002639032,0.00024097915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955557,0.000062406776,0.0013065111,0.00038112217,0.0019337896,0.000760473],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007252932,0.00009501151,0.0002222837,0.0006642086,0.00071119197,0.00015140389,0.00054845464,0.00010329067,0.015756067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004758411,0.000098925484,0.00009032427,0.00041685006,0.00033534886,0.0013132024,0.0000046633513,0.00025619147,0.00003088471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017385526,0.000047779457,0.0019438218,0.00015494699,0.000019938518,5.066122e-7,0.0012850368,1.7964294e-7,0.000018472936,0.11015445,0.884501,0.0018721527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066205,0.000020859063,0.019960957,0.0018716764,0.000061914085,0.000004063177,0.0003149329,1.9621567e-8,0.000074242605,0.0012697156,0.9762623,0.00009316068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83609414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5930218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5555636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055404805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058236796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98514366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244063203","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_300","title":"CARIM","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.05159135001135277,"score_gpt":0.33483076345156104,"score_spread":0.28323941344020825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244063203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022856682,0.0001718564,0.000022546681,0.0022842756,0.0017216576,0.00036482725,0.000050151364,0.00014202537,0.9952198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65666676,0.00005942527,0.00023595545,0.0010960472,0.0020233018,0.000015075173,0.000041397565,0.000042985554,0.33981907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983116,0.00006916032,0.00035440671,0.00037226756,0.00053989614,0.00035270106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827236,0.00021366226,0.0003311104,0.00047618023,0.0005030239,0.00020364326],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005640019,0.0002691242,0.00026087195,0.0002211566,0.00068432133,0.0002478755,0.00040333634,0.0004453682,0.018605758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026065626,0.0002802744,0.00014859447,0.000040895873,0.0006032165,0.0000017582666,0.00006491806,0.00055911083,0.003215543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054246866,2.1465557e-7,0.000016377993,0.0000070300257,0.000049705395,0.000005291254,0.008339368,1.4515764e-8,0.000005026756,0.98262,0.0035700619,0.0053814854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004881659,0.000014652741,0.000015867585,0.000021892054,0.000031811396,0.0000017065123,0.00035781568,2.0337423e-7,0.000007102717,0.5058426,0.4934625,0.00019498733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021388605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049166684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65664387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018026216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013042598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244421737","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_291","title":"Canon Collins Educational and Legal Assistance Trust","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Optometrists; Camargo Foundation; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Royal Academy of Engineering; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government","keywords":"Canon; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.035541561418760075,"score_gpt":0.320677729466371,"score_spread":0.28513616804761094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244421737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027271372,0.00043154752,0.000018720973,0.007917495,0.0014252391,0.00040493897,0.00014676238,0.00005467948,0.9893279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6406783,0.00010265618,0.0003384777,0.000825389,0.0017050738,0.000028842134,0.000063000574,0.000032302778,0.356226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982405,0.00007207192,0.0003889848,0.0004518264,0.0005215655,0.00032509209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981631,0.00033194054,0.00038756628,0.00033620163,0.0005381275,0.00024303282],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049882435,0.00028606295,0.00027077552,0.00021298081,0.0009133798,0.00039878668,0.00027753215,0.00034978715,0.008471085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030319937,0.00030771754,0.00008646229,0.00005750998,0.00081139617,0.0000055125197,0.000049021583,0.000483017,0.00036437056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010325986,8.3280855e-7,0.00016712071,0.00001359571,0.00004833552,0.0000032707,0.0027792077,3.3627217e-8,0.000007710553,0.99192953,0.0028989585,0.0021410596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009115282,0.000019094548,0.00045864182,0.000038359547,0.000037377955,0.0000061659757,0.00029961645,8.480517e-7,0.000005208168,0.46348593,0.5353112,0.00024638584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020026441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0138690965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64040554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026516672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003235151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244425098","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107707191.002","title":"Foreword","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.051083407354461825,"score_gpt":0.28382568681574566,"score_spread":0.23274227946128384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244425098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007427548,0.000028510494,0.00023816746,0.0021273512,0.000678735,0.00024635016,0.00019232834,0.0001328811,0.99634826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00082376384,0.000101471305,0.00006691918,0.0003058427,0.0005127084,5.6505826e-7,0.000013026397,0.000020326024,0.99815536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990764,0.000056805085,0.00012024559,0.00025306919,0.00027732537,0.00021613901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988423,0.00018429097,0.00021167731,0.00029303666,0.00031583742,0.0001528683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020303264,0.00015273514,0.00015404822,0.00014480528,0.00059819606,0.00006797878,0.00039184836,0.0003132423,0.00013707503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008018686,0.0001641637,0.000108144806,0.000011730602,0.00039633072,0.00029291605,0.000086960004,0.00041259127,0.00016131249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011696265,0.0000035102885,8.1630395e-7,0.000005289572,0.000030366306,0.000012711817,0.0003033162,1.1831294e-8,0.0000019183651,0.8004065,0.19600622,0.0032176357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014384523,0.000008300581,0.000004252735,0.000052450483,0.00005870841,9.900706e-7,0.00019657308,3.5182364e-7,0.000008561264,0.00015423069,0.99915314,0.0002186123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008826294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006131787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8031469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030377883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090367335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66944015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245121976","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6091-376-1_1","title":"Ethics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Axiology; Relation (database); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Metaphysics; Meta-ethics; Rhetoric; Philosophy; Boss; Sociology; Law; Information ethics; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.166374438721211,"score_gpt":0.37293763781957473,"score_spread":0.20656319909836374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245121976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000026410473,0.00004901811,0.000021174472,0.019784536,0.0027595349,0.00025725173,0.000011876045,0.00022144895,0.97689253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015956187,0.00003548192,0.00031131742,0.0059304056,0.0010679561,0.0000075937214,0.000032409025,0.00005694363,0.99096227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982534,0.00013951065,0.00032483527,0.00032764275,0.0006463868,0.0003082063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976923,0.00046783432,0.00034860993,0.00042056924,0.00086148316,0.00020923918],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015849756,0.00022053845,0.00020621449,0.00025590073,0.0008415675,0.0007673485,0.00036703658,0.0011017664,0.0091276355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00128869,0.00024152765,0.00013425977,0.00004411059,0.00065718894,0.00055116235,0.000046930338,0.0028187276,0.0008243998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035718226,0.000005001986,0.0000010989463,0.000006333323,0.000032920147,0.0000046813543,0.027986636,1.4303419e-8,6.397913e-7,0.74981344,0.21553163,0.00661401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004997515,0.000010061096,0.0000021039223,0.000027799142,0.00003579054,0.0000018733778,0.00092251913,6.01173e-8,0.0000018822489,0.17461276,0.8240975,0.00023767425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043505356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00456731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60856587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001760159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004454502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245964005","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-100144-8.00017-4","title":"Examples of law librarianship course descriptions in the master of library science programs in ALA accredited schools in Canada and the United States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Library science; Course (navigation); Political science; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.13260536010384502,"score_gpt":0.3146930586647198,"score_spread":0.18208769856087478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245964005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037280194,0.00033220844,1.6098076e-7,0.012401857,0.0001999497,0.0011307461,0.000050985996,0.000009678106,0.9485942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8795518,0.00018033967,0.000225897,0.002164993,0.000101380516,0.00012012687,0.00010750178,0.00002627673,0.11752166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980984,0.00034925237,0.00053776125,0.000197867,0.0005834625,0.00023329927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984579,0.0006392219,0.00034324866,0.0002974007,0.00018901793,0.000073188996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023763047,0.00013989878,0.00025525974,0.00033627404,0.00014607064,0.00025677113,0.0006585872,0.000097851036,0.00006939035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026117105,0.0000939088,0.00002461465,0.0005340863,0.0015484857,0.00072255253,0.000082653394,0.0007187665,8.8993875e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006610562,0.00005112897,0.012986416,0.00004063209,0.000015457344,0.0000060318653,0.07527185,0.0000074848303,0.0000015329666,0.8434179,0.0006237319,0.06751174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052661466,0.000018693207,0.0029609974,0.00037818687,0.000024446115,0.0000012496621,0.02855791,0.000023211196,0.0000029569778,0.08727991,0.88006556,0.00016024816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5625395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92464846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87944186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015843788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010852728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246197666","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14661492","title":"Friend of the Courthouse: a digital media project that promotes access to justice through procedural literacy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Toronto Metropolitan University; Mental Health Commission of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Modernization theory; Economic Justice; Procedural justice; Political science; Literacy; Law; Sociology; Media literacy; Public relations; Media studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.14111799043299839,"score_gpt":0.45928059496490053,"score_spread":0.31816260453190215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246197666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3056344,0.00019146164,0.0013315235,0.30359524,0.007313651,0.0042315135,0.00029088676,0.00028037664,0.37713093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989308,0.000047325484,0.002845768,0.0026832286,0.0005618094,0.00018118812,0.000067633526,0.000021553009,0.0042834748],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978898,0.00021314315,0.00038696325,0.00041833048,0.00080561533,0.00028611615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714655,0.0006685705,0.00043871213,0.00049798907,0.0011733142,0.00007488298],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048607736,0.00019553579,0.00024488784,0.00008768137,0.00044939748,0.0034980804,0.001154614,0.00020437175,0.0005074936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008284123,0.00013833515,0.00012114285,0.0013165926,0.00021780166,0.0032474713,0.0008863703,0.000767642,0.000012489995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027130565,0.0005990234,0.0040847235,0.0005092215,0.00010949157,0.0000030128267,0.88752174,0.00002097912,0.000021951915,0.0366877,0.06493345,0.005481544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002645944,0.000032580323,0.007907189,0.00083680573,0.00032136755,0.000009227578,0.18962637,0.000036989793,0.0016399239,0.0074836216,0.791007,0.00083432114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071520004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035352458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72607356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011117549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007299485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246639292","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2015.00721.x","title":"SLSA E‐Newsletter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Socio-Legal Studies Association","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.09787803011972525,"score_gpt":0.4092254532930785,"score_spread":0.3113474231733533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246639292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13023125,0.00025069967,0.0002977518,0.2659749,0.0012776076,0.00004614824,8.903616e-7,0.000010581702,0.6019102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97248894,0.00009031198,0.0023646676,0.022156227,0.0008878318,3.1360258e-7,2.183514e-7,0.0000022314914,0.0020092586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995245,0.000059381506,0.00012498115,0.000027170976,0.0001970424,0.000066931105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993569,0.000074372176,0.000121619545,0.000029018784,0.0003127588,0.000105304505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011575785,0.000024141504,0.00005428201,0.000007801788,0.00020066986,0.00011300298,0.000055148772,0.000041344447,0.00007288475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001583997,0.000019340105,0.000046922796,0.000083829924,0.00011856949,0.00056072517,0.000006067217,0.00020107218,0.000006333039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004023734,0.000038981576,0.00071392965,0.0000018874122,0.000023203273,0.0000013584622,0.09589096,8.615549e-7,0.000053092645,0.5551333,0.3475456,0.0005928539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014578136,0.000016331216,0.00023041695,0.0000030644717,0.000008450807,0.000006430665,0.013274998,0.0000017160971,0.000010129502,0.0052905935,0.98098516,0.000026915863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004900381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047255046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8422577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003527656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003924267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15434106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246698716","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_349","title":"Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the United Kingdom","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Optometrists; Camargo Foundation; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Royal Academy of Engineering; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government","keywords":"Commonwealth; Scholarship; Kingdom; Commission; Political science; Public administration; Law; Geology","score_opus":0.14410826797004261,"score_gpt":0.3893260112318629,"score_spread":0.24521774326182028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246698716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008896371,0.0000708741,0.000010129062,0.009028453,0.00061248854,0.0006052509,0.000025650334,0.00007174587,0.9886858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97499716,0.00004272015,0.00012034462,0.0037564866,0.0008078585,0.000023781186,0.000110621986,0.000038647322,0.020102374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752903,0.0005637352,0.00048061623,0.00031444835,0.00072415266,0.0003880084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975705,0.0008542829,0.00042620362,0.0006332107,0.00036255212,0.00015323525],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002787285,0.00027672038,0.00026243643,0.0005017399,0.0010467878,0.00040043512,0.0008749966,0.00043576202,0.0025615816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063046435,0.00022009315,0.00010111049,0.00018696336,0.00054518844,0.0000040284453,0.00007487954,0.0014728027,0.00047469191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015066016,0.0000011400252,0.00038162313,0.000011110044,0.000016104172,0.000007590777,0.014841677,8.984292e-8,0.0000023878756,0.9821101,0.0011310171,0.0014821152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115312396,0.000023404793,0.0005548441,0.00009142561,0.000017676046,0.0000026362864,0.0009210189,0.0000010861027,0.0000019226616,0.5013201,0.4967788,0.00017176243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00803719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012395078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9741075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021014508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008798081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247329531","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/3566.003.0012","title":"Why Wasn’t O. J. Convicted? Emotional Coherence in Legal Inference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"The MIT Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Psychology; Inference; Law; Political science; Criminology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.07130688875975338,"score_gpt":0.34171721904851554,"score_spread":0.27041033028876216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247329531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005587548,0.00017679515,0.00007337072,0.00828912,0.00059982465,0.0004726801,0.000050780607,0.00006958457,0.99021196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024673797,0.000033655364,0.00005947892,0.002688774,0.00058514153,0.000056159348,0.0000479585,0.000024492161,0.97183055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983234,0.00016636318,0.0003953873,0.0002837594,0.00055045215,0.0002806665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983403,0.000610952,0.00031923235,0.00036182467,0.00030108876,0.00006657275],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056665466,0.00021661787,0.0002062677,0.000105427986,0.00045077756,0.00037526825,0.0006262795,0.00029454406,0.0014604796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022653767,0.00018542455,0.000071220165,0.00003150715,0.0006151473,0.00028614225,0.00008057476,0.0010880489,0.00010937652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078851235,0.00001791932,0.000011590896,0.00000865529,0.000019471416,0.0000036115375,0.0024368884,0.000011023653,0.0000063425778,0.8724672,0.12349759,0.0015118102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012285338,0.000009536667,0.000101189056,0.0000950001,0.000028316621,0.0000015746202,0.00008700588,0.000009328658,0.000015188683,0.017071605,0.9822381,0.00022026802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03894632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011828363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85874057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014711363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010873604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247660381","doi":"10.4018/9781591405733.ch067","title":"Knowledge Sharing in Legal Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.08127254413743325,"score_gpt":0.38485079585648024,"score_spread":0.303578251719047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247660381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001870152,0.000278584,0.00001450381,0.0032099558,0.0015141753,0.0003080736,0.000016404525,0.00010511393,0.9945345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.123964556,0.000026272806,0.00040233036,0.0016905089,0.0009096134,0.00002437968,0.000003915658,0.000030545132,0.8729479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984687,0.00007594817,0.00040262495,0.00039381968,0.000325801,0.00033309063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985815,0.00019283453,0.00033531396,0.00033691598,0.00040395584,0.00014942244],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008635299,0.00022099398,0.00023046881,0.00013277691,0.0003061567,0.00032624093,0.00047003425,0.00043231982,0.00078796595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008905555,0.0002540906,0.00008825135,0.000089338726,0.0001855869,0.00066787784,0.00010838455,0.0008510974,0.0014582541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018181876,0.000037150057,0.000023807803,0.000007747706,0.000026281943,0.000021099495,0.0053440193,9.269694e-8,3.795186e-7,0.9807192,0.008533104,0.00526893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000924728,0.00001214208,0.000021988653,0.00006280493,0.000031886033,0.000007201447,0.0005081079,3.8927553e-7,7.9118934e-7,0.24986048,0.74919534,0.00020642125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01862052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024678126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7406622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067637005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026413891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247808884","doi":"10.5406/amerjtheophil.41.2-3.0184","title":"Contemporary Philosophical Proposals for the University: Toward a Philosophy of Higher Education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Theology & Philosophy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy education; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0881718987715581,"score_gpt":0.35736914275874204,"score_spread":0.2691972439871839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247808884","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004368153,0.00043454822,0.0006479042,0.9277308,0.00081122573,0.00032944826,0.0000150066835,0.000017697572,0.06564519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777139,0.00008908962,0.001212483,0.018200066,0.002519282,0.0000041412472,0.0000028887678,0.000012793339,0.00024534692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984371,0.00053330325,0.00044014375,0.00014954523,0.00028247142,0.00015745863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672794,0.0010481084,0.0011141258,0.00015367623,0.0008077204,0.0001484323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067663117,0.000115074334,0.00034268876,0.00014628045,0.0003045957,0.000023267823,0.0006323134,0.00007060311,0.000234251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067578023,0.00008883533,0.00020722442,0.0007766221,0.0018531522,0.00048020724,0.000039272065,0.00043459807,0.000011512457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006501911,0.00022060268,0.00081611646,0.000017447668,0.00020217316,0.0000026999478,0.0069843885,0.000005441256,0.00010114258,0.97302157,0.014411241,0.0035669778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005881713,0.0011470974,0.00044247697,0.00003558135,0.00016683135,0.000011382685,0.005234335,0.000007888724,0.000059608792,0.41556403,0.5765835,0.00015910596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016560173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013286813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97334576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060216542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026907767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68280166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248148381","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.313","title":"LEGAL POSITIVISM AS AN IDEA ABOUT MORALITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Morality; Utilitarianism; Legal realism; Law; Directive; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Legal profession","score_opus":0.04242048475938505,"score_gpt":0.3216567940517019,"score_spread":0.27923630929231685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248148381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08509101,0.00004452743,0.00018674915,0.0032634605,0.00035764783,0.00004349215,0.000003806722,0.000019406396,0.9109899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356407,0.00006879045,0.0022114122,0.0002832081,0.00013758475,2.1544539e-8,0.000001557116,0.0000026027137,0.003730732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992205,0.00023954791,0.000097990946,0.00007841959,0.00022696967,0.00013655992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991819,0.000029436122,0.00017417416,0.00009754696,0.00034210808,0.00017483096],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006175792,0.000046529596,0.00007653811,0.000016979655,0.0011937234,0.00007654275,0.0002669622,0.00005713189,0.010204166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058260426,0.000054090004,0.000052343727,0.000047665544,0.00025407097,0.0036143006,0.000018847772,0.00021058852,0.00002871196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041328687,0.0001368901,0.0006166743,0.0000010085456,0.00002025283,0.000014196016,0.04475762,2.5957442e-7,0.000031007112,0.9512867,0.0014280799,0.00166601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026087253,0.00009427836,0.024992527,0.00000993638,0.00003471941,0.000020142825,0.069471434,0.000002711817,0.0000479433,0.0041525243,0.90080595,0.00010695051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8115668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45587763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94713414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022628321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049066846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99070066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248622385","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-95988-4_814","title":"Sir Richard Stapley Educational Trust","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Board; Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; Savoy Foundation; University of Calgary; U.S. Department of State","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.049050566006464284,"score_gpt":0.3244803922687553,"score_spread":0.275429826262291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248622385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002063071,0.00029359985,0.000020923502,0.032796744,0.0016271877,0.00053362193,0.00018561388,0.00012850232,0.9643932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77847594,0.00011049127,0.00042248121,0.0033798805,0.0028663825,0.0000487278,0.00024579588,0.00006635339,0.21438397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976697,0.000100927944,0.00052331045,0.0005363643,0.0007930263,0.00037668046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777025,0.00045688485,0.00047785693,0.00041417344,0.0004971887,0.00038362114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043072074,0.00036821622,0.00035909153,0.00024384898,0.0007561801,0.0003240924,0.0005256032,0.00039291155,0.014244114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060792884,0.00040136208,0.00021033305,0.000087416964,0.00038965122,0.0000041973904,0.00008219132,0.0008828201,0.0025666426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009071495,9.065555e-7,0.00007779474,0.000018781673,0.00008357081,0.000004575249,0.0056773885,2.1562978e-7,0.000008497358,0.9842915,0.006267348,0.0035603472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008484012,0.000017082699,0.000108601984,0.000023239909,0.000044698154,0.0000019703912,0.00043983784,0.0000012773767,0.0000039844936,0.5124918,0.48649704,0.00028558032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008157992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008972923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7784553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027939925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032055422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248628795","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14661492.v1","title":"Friend of the Courthouse: a digital media project that promotes access to justice through procedural literacy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Toronto Metropolitan University; Mental Health Commission of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Modernization theory; Procedural justice; Political science; Literacy; Law; Media literacy; Sociology; Public relations; Internet privacy; Media studies; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.14111799043299839,"score_gpt":0.45928059496490053,"score_spread":0.31816260453190215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248628795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3056344,0.00019146164,0.0013315235,0.30359524,0.007313651,0.0042315135,0.00029088676,0.00028037664,0.37713093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989308,0.000047325484,0.002845768,0.0026832286,0.0005618094,0.00018118812,0.000067633526,0.000021553009,0.0042834748],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978898,0.00021314315,0.00038696325,0.00041833048,0.00080561533,0.00028611615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714655,0.0006685705,0.00043871213,0.00049798907,0.0011733142,0.00007488298],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048607736,0.00019553579,0.00024488784,0.00008768137,0.00044939748,0.0034980804,0.001154614,0.00020437175,0.0005074936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008284123,0.00013833515,0.00012114285,0.0013165926,0.00021780166,0.0032474713,0.0008863703,0.000767642,0.000012489995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027130565,0.0005990234,0.0040847235,0.0005092215,0.00010949157,0.0000030128267,0.88752174,0.00002097912,0.000021951915,0.0366877,0.06493345,0.005481544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002645944,0.000032580323,0.007907189,0.00083680573,0.00032136755,0.000009227578,0.18962637,0.000036989793,0.0016399239,0.0074836216,0.791007,0.00083432114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071520004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035352458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72607356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011117549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007299485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248781124","doi":"10.1108/ilds.2000.12228aab.018","title":"Canadian court rejects fair dealing defence by library","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Computer security; Operations research; Business; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.010103168903791749,"score_gpt":0.3070073940042801,"score_spread":0.29690422510048836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248781124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15039758,0.00023531922,0.000042176387,0.24430996,0.0010669107,0.00033979703,0.000058630118,0.0002553374,0.6032943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9375126,0.00020391625,0.0006636158,0.0044948324,0.00023226837,0.00003090402,0.000070869,0.000017363302,0.05677363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860746,0.00014742605,0.00025060948,0.00024267728,0.000282196,0.0004696527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921805,0.00017537225,0.00007213807,0.00016648759,0.00004109205,0.00032683715],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003871535,0.00011573336,0.00009914301,0.00017095583,0.00076642656,0.0008105088,0.0003664773,0.00008251201,0.042785946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010258339,0.00012694248,0.000046514928,0.00050501665,0.000084607855,0.002516517,0.000015628775,0.0003111021,0.0010563752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013698412,0.000046295536,0.012672827,0.000006214125,0.000029268936,0.000012679449,0.023999292,0.000007600428,0.00006546618,0.056409236,0.87151,0.03522739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008520727,0.000018997367,0.00033803584,0.000042371095,0.00000856433,0.0000029211335,0.0041110287,0.0000060772754,0.00022748722,0.0018634942,0.99313754,0.00015827827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4390019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10747139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78711504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004142322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011380265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249099904","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316337875","title":"Fighting Fair","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Legal ethics; Law; Honor; Settlement (finance); Political science; Legal profession; Analogy; Economic Justice; Dilemma; Ethical dilemma; Legal realism; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Business","score_opus":0.062077414310443446,"score_gpt":0.30066293299140473,"score_spread":0.23858551868096128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249099904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001335666,0.00004981148,0.000061309314,0.0009302213,0.0008273318,0.00026343574,0.00008351948,0.00018682287,0.99758416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002600273,0.000026891421,0.00011550625,0.0002725705,0.00072522776,7.651449e-7,0.000086118096,0.000018643774,0.99849427],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987165,0.00019680365,0.00013766543,0.00027180096,0.00042043778,0.00025684352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839294,0.00019563397,0.00026235046,0.00028424308,0.0006445249,0.00022027829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048496493,0.00015718216,0.00018293281,0.00015914165,0.00069778535,0.00017512325,0.00049812393,0.00034005658,0.00003021512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028422195,0.00020051458,0.00008595939,0.000043153825,0.00029368527,0.00037194404,0.00012067175,0.00071945164,0.000095918884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049765067,0.0000052782593,6.3894055e-7,0.0000074775508,0.000016792093,0.000011874434,0.0010535204,1.8365343e-7,4.9425205e-7,0.49529466,0.5032193,0.00038477973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015122765,0.000008630044,0.0000025190323,0.00003953983,0.00006824894,0.0000011778951,0.0015679477,0.0000027586614,0.0000045592124,0.0000354485,0.9978881,0.00022985203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033419079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000085639826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49525923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088327983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005468715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97012657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249280584","doi":"10.4000/hommesmigrations.3123","title":"The Good Lie","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Hommes & migrations","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.0848367859243728,"score_gpt":0.38380570506240813,"score_spread":0.29896891913803536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249280584","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028496594,0.06176392,0.00032595822,0.7029571,0.006125635,0.00020975391,0.000026378912,0.00005827495,0.22568335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39815825,0.0011041269,0.0007739561,0.0037697114,0.0018398861,0.00007267516,0.00003319172,0.000013711869,0.59423447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984644,0.00041707433,0.00028707003,0.00015484598,0.00035392257,0.00032269172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979858,0.0008330106,0.00016165992,0.00030925198,0.0004861201,0.00022417693],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010747112,0.000109995904,0.000085343716,0.00004618902,0.0018592069,0.0007138296,0.00030030913,0.00011437211,0.0005847088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017920177,0.00009075962,0.00006888745,0.0012609389,0.0005283105,0.0010976809,0.000030983996,0.00040518327,0.0026192262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013314806,0.00008334408,0.0002504057,9.0770726e-7,0.000013779727,2.9998174e-7,0.015970837,0.000005669576,0.0000015578622,0.4298353,0.5304772,0.023359347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001082175,0.00002756152,0.0005140914,0.000008637909,0.00004037804,0.0000033631559,0.047588184,0.00006330349,0.000008720574,0.019302579,0.93222415,0.000110778616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075733894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024424357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69918734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017623552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024083543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249297268","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_299","title":"Cargill","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04991027217359135,"score_gpt":0.3320963596114717,"score_spread":0.2821860874378804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249297268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000245,0.00018439803,0.000017357372,0.002289048,0.0017178856,0.00038045584,0.00006269743,0.00014653792,0.9951771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64548326,0.0000736572,0.00021787199,0.0011421506,0.0019784372,0.000016034906,0.000040995437,0.0000455279,0.3510021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982514,0.00007197681,0.00036667218,0.00038629293,0.00055411516,0.00036953756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820036,0.0002168466,0.00034312258,0.00048494127,0.0005406668,0.00021408968],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005746124,0.0002808163,0.0002711841,0.00022923897,0.00070907106,0.00022218235,0.00040937404,0.00044537504,0.019306691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026645145,0.00029071874,0.00015741566,0.000042701424,0.0005980324,0.0000018548758,0.00006541182,0.0005480731,0.0033937204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005686153,2.1774066e-7,0.0000144261185,0.000007366236,0.000049176826,0.0000056710132,0.007396579,1.7071908e-8,0.000004868999,0.9842965,0.0035538026,0.0046656583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052471256,0.00001467789,0.000013393556,0.000022904285,0.000029904837,0.000001799826,0.00033608536,2.1277356e-7,0.000007748861,0.4914291,0.50788915,0.00020256227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016121569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044013765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64545876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000185168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010979609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249315802","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59140-789-8.ch039","title":"Courts on the Web in Russia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Skepticism; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.07692944479282737,"score_gpt":0.37327013608620674,"score_spread":0.29634069129337937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249315802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015051143,0.000043416003,0.0000022354434,0.021645645,0.0009680097,0.00030777729,0.00002764784,0.00005173681,0.976803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40224874,0.000016347998,0.00005302694,0.011795956,0.00086124026,0.000014948601,0.000002938397,0.000018937777,0.5849879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987148,0.000060738763,0.00026121398,0.00020686434,0.0005036974,0.00025266092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905396,0.00029400733,0.00019130451,0.0002638729,0.00011425902,0.00008260224],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088397466,0.00015899917,0.00014102718,0.00008362799,0.0003347151,0.00018531167,0.00031297156,0.00031881058,0.00092145434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026433484,0.00012578943,0.00007020202,0.00005810826,0.00022353193,0.00007191647,0.000025390797,0.0006823532,0.00084610994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000092044365,0.000010937349,0.000014466668,0.0000014129715,0.000010296795,0.00000886635,0.0009696399,2.4594655e-7,3.0239568e-7,0.96263283,0.033073094,0.0032686822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051967294,0.000009304252,0.00006278117,0.00004049644,0.0000076399465,0.0000010256441,0.00025120535,5.1919073e-7,7.153712e-7,0.2763405,0.7231251,0.000108750646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002295601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01259896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.690052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045871534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001724518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249716097","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_62-2","title":"Inclusive Legal Positivism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Positivism; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Legal research; Legal realism","score_opus":0.03266730902986802,"score_gpt":0.3774347348438907,"score_spread":0.34476742581402264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249716097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005422532,0.000025472758,0.00006920442,0.06361739,0.0011052503,0.0001552676,0.000009739931,0.000088510424,0.93492377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003999684,0.000048229183,0.00038302934,0.0052230367,0.0022200455,0.0000042818174,0.000030223007,0.000018248946,0.9880732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991183,0.00003274567,0.00017124599,0.0001824536,0.00034622563,0.00014902899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998912,0.00016812277,0.00016120044,0.00016773918,0.00050338364,0.000087560016],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037869008,0.00011464619,0.00011197982,0.00011723531,0.00067976414,0.00026066176,0.00019262863,0.00025893326,0.07153282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023036599,0.000113193164,0.00005813765,0.00005924844,0.0003241489,0.0005146797,0.000054463933,0.0004057636,0.0053022276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014740223,0.0000062417043,4.881855e-7,9.630681e-7,0.000014654967,0.0000017064175,0.0039281044,6.712945e-9,9.746088e-7,0.74051106,0.25425616,0.0012781707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003066763,0.000013786286,0.000003884968,0.0000134587435,0.0000180763,0.0000013818387,0.0006934515,2.3098974e-7,0.000004079392,0.079496615,0.919581,0.00014335329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038816684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00478511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66532487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017825002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019364334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99547225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249933271","doi":"10.1108/s1521-6136(2001)3","title":"Legal Professions: Work, Structure and Organization","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.027101067354962153,"score_gpt":0.3501249044114485,"score_spread":0.32302383705648635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249933271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012011655,0.00006825087,0.00007594063,0.03299974,0.0008823563,0.00026127216,0.000006385266,0.000098739496,0.9654872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00486468,0.0001951911,0.00045278526,0.0016546181,0.00085644395,0.0000031805632,0.00017059893,0.000019500965,0.991783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991885,0.00008725829,0.00016416823,0.00017618448,0.00025087435,0.0001330454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908876,0.00014534824,0.00015415903,0.00012415086,0.00040895367,0.00007862192],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018598094,0.000105782754,0.00010451846,0.00010765998,0.00062259217,0.00033528963,0.000119031654,0.00036115514,0.013451219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007841593,0.000094687595,0.000012160266,0.0005787554,0.00012727168,0.0005764772,0.000028434677,0.0005543003,0.00010219648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.992852e-7,0.000008138156,0.00041122007,0.0000048183665,0.000007833096,7.132748e-7,0.0028870301,9.854752e-8,7.794352e-7,0.47886306,0.5155315,0.002283843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043710297,0.0000030662031,0.00027017848,0.00003107193,0.000018579021,0.0000017415945,0.0011992672,1.2535352e-7,0.0000014354529,0.007980762,0.9903248,0.00012524672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006059142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001225155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47479334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015111861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00321926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250006761","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_342","title":"Clemson University","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Optometrists; Camargo Foundation; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Royal Academy of Engineering; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04383028402972004,"score_gpt":0.30483223835372,"score_spread":0.2610019543239999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250006761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000056109828,0.000054046937,0.00002907937,0.0020472088,0.0009473599,0.00027315263,0.000055888788,0.00012398549,0.9964132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6210346,0.00007206763,0.00018373046,0.00041506387,0.0009049569,0.0000010162108,0.000028771103,0.000023663713,0.37733608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987336,0.000080988844,0.000200364,0.0003196003,0.00038792434,0.00027751792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986204,0.00017589249,0.00027614125,0.00035554176,0.0003945269,0.0001775269],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004382493,0.00020486978,0.00019990749,0.00021994454,0.00073559204,0.00012280837,0.00037834232,0.0003684789,0.013057327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012750701,0.00023499297,0.00012381561,0.000047634967,0.0005379249,0.0000023127945,0.00006623102,0.00045318968,0.0020045794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010925291,2.4227452e-7,0.00002154422,0.000005410063,0.000039380444,0.0000086590535,0.005478778,1.6190045e-8,0.000003656608,0.98713034,0.002767427,0.004533632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006405514,0.000014823415,0.00003133572,0.000019512276,0.000031267355,0.0000010132326,0.00077435456,2.8965664e-7,0.0000038051187,0.43123126,0.567655,0.00017326542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018746799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049537453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62097853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023882135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009972595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250144784","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1011","title":"METHODOLOGY AND PERSPECTIVE IN THE THEORY OF LAWYERS’ ETHICS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSORS WOOLLEY AND MARKOVITS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Adjudication; Identity (music); Sociology; Legal profession; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.10050969560981,"score_gpt":0.41219862166908017,"score_spread":0.3116889260592702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250144784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7854529,0.00013070453,0.00018424522,0.11561943,0.00023049225,0.00015487477,0.0000040066834,0.0000035168393,0.09821986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935022,0.00008926554,0.005244915,0.00043500582,0.000031577536,9.1012296e-8,6.836846e-8,0.0000013734912,0.0006954798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695665,0.0026859385,0.000073475596,0.000064818894,0.00013961742,0.000079526384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966346,0.0028406428,0.00011282062,0.00006288282,0.00029545845,0.000053601918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009226384,0.000032616055,0.00008049766,0.00003861941,0.0005522041,0.000023335202,0.00015631395,0.00008405848,0.0003559212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032437767,0.000028457935,0.000017096065,0.000074904,0.00048292638,0.0004063906,0.00002848257,0.00058672053,4.014001e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040938906,0.000023882862,0.00038945157,0.0000014635813,0.000009158134,0.0000018186606,0.42671022,1.524416e-7,0.0004315326,0.57140297,0.00015523803,0.00046474193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002813671,0.00006833448,0.03174059,0.0000105897025,0.000016723036,0.000012217329,0.8617592,5.37604e-7,0.000014749621,0.013003356,0.09305094,0.00004138107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1126417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49960744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5583996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007040978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039609504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8932673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250408531","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0024","title":"The Teacher","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affection; Sociology; Law; Rigour; Humanity; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019947039724658742,"score_gpt":0.31696612613223707,"score_spread":0.29701908640757835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250408531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048347646,0.00017353377,0.0005538575,0.015527865,0.00038925104,0.000023295068,2.6139438e-7,0.0000068060813,0.97849035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97537094,0.00023208447,0.0007056061,0.0001237631,0.0002401323,3.989871e-9,1.6310592e-7,0.0000012550565,0.023326034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995908,0.000070401344,0.00005685465,0.00002605013,0.00015708084,0.00009881461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999482,0.00013264311,0.00009693144,0.00004750501,0.00017884096,0.00006212946],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014316578,0.000018549868,0.000025966223,0.0000056217114,0.0022213415,0.000051193172,0.00017810939,0.00002645737,0.002354381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001052182,0.000016059068,0.000028946184,0.00003262539,0.00020971133,0.0006129274,0.000009428075,0.00015537026,0.000011417455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023090293,0.000033852048,0.00056725246,2.9186367e-7,0.00001596553,0.00000266047,0.02537956,3.7875864e-7,0.000017449553,0.9331527,0.023208924,0.017597912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006618118,0.000006724499,0.002669073,0.0000015122148,0.00000536274,0.0000019563045,0.08381604,5.137602e-7,0.0000037270208,0.0005802024,0.9128293,0.000019414843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18158036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.638037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019914187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001920429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250534731","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_316","title":"Centre for Asia-Pacific Initiatives (CAPI)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Geography; Asia pacific; Political science; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.05120010329582189,"score_gpt":0.3344249235467145,"score_spread":0.2832248202508926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250534731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011494945,0.00015174417,0.00009860494,0.005512265,0.0014615486,0.000987582,0.00028058735,0.000131775,0.9913644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7195922,0.00009828969,0.0007607882,0.0005295933,0.0021849724,0.000051447267,0.0001772463,0.00006815296,0.2765373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998098,0.00009279881,0.00044128206,0.00047044398,0.00044370056,0.0004537736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751514,0.00058043643,0.0004942807,0.00040361096,0.0007974543,0.00020908476],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059870427,0.00034131715,0.00033699244,0.00026467335,0.00086986565,0.00028718027,0.00037646695,0.0004475205,0.007991814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005181803,0.00035143585,0.0002201018,0.00004958138,0.0006299257,0.000005423327,0.000048346046,0.0004213568,0.00088028505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020784099,7.570434e-7,0.00002490964,0.000022346114,0.00008881779,0.000002038626,0.017001793,1.4553616e-8,0.000007312486,0.9740878,0.005358408,0.0033850595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011754724,0.000026472564,0.000019979032,0.000041458927,0.000043800697,8.744046e-7,0.003121768,8.262597e-7,0.000018628316,0.49686489,0.49949688,0.0002468986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019963163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015873943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7195807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001655892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010779002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251701146","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4052067","title":"Building Trusted Relationships Through Interactive PLE Conversations - A Report on the Newcomer Conversations: Learning Canadian Law Project","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Citizenship; Immigration; Political science; Law; Sociology; Asylum seeker; Public relations","score_opus":0.07313580962840463,"score_gpt":0.37574792538484514,"score_spread":0.30261211575644054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251701146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08323873,0.0003019177,0.005668171,0.39077148,0.0018747045,0.0007783199,0.00000955362,0.00012932681,0.5172278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857389,0.00021407258,0.00038822606,0.0020503236,0.00040036158,0.000029322004,0.000030107285,0.00001574317,0.01113295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968074,0.0012301438,0.00035884522,0.00021003664,0.0003761747,0.0010174285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972177,0.0014114456,0.0003688283,0.00018792176,0.00071526144,0.00009885034],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038170381,0.00011235354,0.000113730624,0.00015713474,0.0047043157,0.0005172904,0.00019755654,0.000102528684,0.00066566386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008004565,0.00009962692,0.00008614115,0.0012282432,0.00016078293,0.0013138003,0.000014231161,0.0047792085,0.00008012394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007007853,0.00003255965,0.0020647019,6.788574e-7,0.00010893991,0.000010220627,0.02010858,0.00005653058,0.00001166472,0.9756911,0.0016962459,0.00021177743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018509044,0.000030301066,0.0004455041,0.000020204154,0.000045422927,0.00024334533,0.19777817,0.00004737164,0.00003294988,0.14618212,0.6548593,0.00013019535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2997766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6332597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90250015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031309435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037282918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251738714","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_336","title":"Chinese American Medical Society (CAMS)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.026621517910298473,"score_gpt":0.3526837615935208,"score_spread":0.3260622436832223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251738714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002871045,0.00011437177,0.0000633738,0.009228837,0.0013584621,0.0003378797,0.00005056023,0.00018332545,0.9883761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85749197,0.0003066653,0.0006315958,0.005491144,0.0038073522,0.000025929543,0.00007682963,0.000069308124,0.13209921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970913,0.00010951513,0.00049200153,0.0004988501,0.001333749,0.0004745838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997599,0.0004560199,0.00055524457,0.00052176166,0.00047792264,0.00039003586],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011020325,0.0003699795,0.00043782007,0.00013546005,0.0007780726,0.00021990115,0.00067090214,0.0004991417,0.023539735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007918857,0.00034406935,0.0003472127,0.000109001645,0.002169245,0.0000027708309,0.00012807162,0.0009962834,0.0013449581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008910442,9.354891e-7,0.00023651743,0.00001109346,0.00012664897,0.000007786377,0.01390121,1.4925448e-8,0.0000026443574,0.9559167,0.007357229,0.022430282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116181,0.000035750756,0.0001785605,0.000046415757,0.00003894966,0.000005259578,0.0010313729,0.0000044006374,0.00000131807,0.4631253,0.5350568,0.0003597063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003117824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0084007075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85720485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019667008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019498613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252037961","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6091-731-8","title":"Phronesis as Professional Knowledge","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":225,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Charles Sturt University","keywords":"Phronesis; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04626959592968561,"score_gpt":0.3879190824036205,"score_spread":0.3416494864739349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252037961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000048298494,0.0002657165,0.000002774035,0.009608749,0.009662772,0.00051607675,0.000015828726,0.00024655715,0.9796332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002228443,0.000008054092,0.000142861,0.002197519,0.004812767,0.00005580152,0.00014386108,0.00006781172,0.99034286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975143,0.0004167848,0.00039693678,0.00037507847,0.0007137338,0.0005831333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973987,0.00059764244,0.0004039476,0.00041487432,0.0008012187,0.00038367137],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015071346,0.00029047395,0.00028720795,0.00035364146,0.0011205708,0.0007971933,0.00044952042,0.00081085495,0.008445404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009630757,0.00029445093,0.00016325708,0.00017483109,0.0005477997,0.0011267249,0.000090565634,0.0014038078,0.0030254233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060791263,0.000049473365,0.000005909503,0.000017894732,0.000040790565,0.0000015942398,0.022172397,1.2407382e-8,0.0000022900936,0.30273595,0.6657492,0.009218417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012561015,0.0000112480575,0.000021145916,0.00006423956,0.00007110656,0.0000040589885,0.0034067028,2.1806505e-7,0.000005712642,0.010721559,0.9852067,0.00036168113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012082667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013459644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31945753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007420412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017797584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252188144","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-1714-0119","title":"submission-to-the-canadian-government-in-preparation-for-the-50th-session-of-the-unchr-from-the-interchurch-committee-on-human-rights-in-latin-america-jan-1994-12-pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Latin Americans; Political science; Government (linguistics); Library science; Public administration; Law; Business; Computer science; Advertising; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05825050803196535,"score_gpt":0.4165524129577917,"score_spread":0.35830190492582636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252188144","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010986388,0.00020008312,0.000041027026,0.12313733,0.006790734,0.00724717,0.83776045,0.0000745546,0.013762265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20767385,0.00024607033,0.0007225932,0.021668792,0.010151554,0.002580797,0.59983283,0.00021972069,0.1569038],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99365723,0.0010123102,0.0015193275,0.00086722546,0.002043515,0.000900408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99292123,0.0030703337,0.0012694187,0.002118242,0.00027128516,0.0003494589],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016869365,0.00061135244,0.00061385444,0.0002887037,0.006086911,0.00065386103,0.0034644236,0.0004339797,0.006915229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007477238,0.00030152898,0.00028721237,0.00093487074,0.0007839694,0.0006423339,0.0002542673,0.0015005479,0.00035874773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005210593,0.00044980473,0.00020250671,0.000013793185,0.00010025201,0.0000040190866,0.0022527429,0.000013415181,0.000009236238,0.015205491,0.9812777,0.00041895706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007398934,0.00009660368,0.0016232763,0.0005034458,0.00010543981,7.2965173e-7,0.00035848797,0.000010219426,0.000023381735,0.010188234,0.9858959,0.00045439764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48133224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9368609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45552868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016889048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001374329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252698176","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59140-573-3.ch067","title":"Knowledge Sharing in Legal Practice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Knowledge management; Business; Knowledge sharing; Legal practice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.050255635860958554,"score_gpt":0.3795066023293226,"score_spread":0.32925096646836405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252698176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025058123,0.00029073248,0.000017639893,0.0059179263,0.0012656314,0.000312443,0.000024442304,0.00011211545,0.992034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10111123,0.0000092706305,0.00035375883,0.0014060417,0.0012075979,0.00002036849,0.000008654839,0.00002757719,0.8958555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998355,0.00007233469,0.00043418776,0.00039727252,0.00039953348,0.00034172324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986261,0.00024503176,0.0003308321,0.0003020004,0.00038357938,0.00011242698],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007834594,0.00022482353,0.00023272801,0.0001375033,0.00033684235,0.00048401143,0.0004010431,0.00042535382,0.0002797824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068146404,0.00026410105,0.00009100193,0.00010716648,0.00016981304,0.0006008321,0.00008645489,0.00082285225,0.0008047066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010743345,0.000036333477,0.000028821763,0.000007662297,0.000017118304,0.000023600089,0.0012319955,0.0000014718879,4.878147e-7,0.9541814,0.041944977,0.0025154306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012269164,0.000009903304,0.000034142893,0.00006708924,0.000032664477,0.00000741913,0.00038890674,0.0000020309221,6.4444697e-7,0.13612834,0.86296606,0.00024012176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026624193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034668557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8210211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009458867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025631213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252727894","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1003","title":"THREE ISSUES IN LEGAL ETHICS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Law; Adjudication; Jury; Political science; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.03897483545341218,"score_gpt":0.3586189794483755,"score_spread":0.3196441439949633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252727894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056336652,0.00010716417,0.000263902,0.1049134,0.0011962743,0.00005488013,0.0000021254277,0.000014376147,0.83711123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925078,0.00019284022,0.004350432,0.00023173014,0.00025964755,1.5918012e-8,5.559353e-7,0.0000019729418,0.0024549814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947315,0.000085097454,0.00007592695,0.000048951082,0.0002166956,0.00010017333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993923,0.00012607907,0.00009796527,0.000064670756,0.00025077004,0.00006821873],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010701645,0.000029967674,0.000057197343,0.000019762603,0.00076934986,0.00006818013,0.00021710094,0.00009951806,0.005452257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031919224,0.000035002355,0.000029573379,0.000054319516,0.00023426658,0.0015316397,0.000015780644,0.00090405694,0.000012284934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011393285,0.000053356558,0.0017399489,0.0000012157697,0.0000059104163,0.0000061657843,0.034084607,0.0000010326272,0.00012617992,0.9579858,0.0045620175,0.001422373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014202404,0.000010765836,0.0053029577,0.0000056782656,0.0000047954454,0.0000036604858,0.02503524,0.0000041297985,0.000009248137,0.0027231395,0.9667168,0.00004155433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7211011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9833428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9621548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011128767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061815075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252803649","doi":"10.29173/alr1372","title":"Legal Research","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.24755236999644284,"score_gpt":0.5007470153889492,"score_spread":0.25319464539250636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252803649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000048261143,0.013777651,6.038574e-7,0.26197696,0.00017667782,0.00018537759,2.7131424e-7,0.00001232711,0.7238219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42963645,0.121038675,0.00022477751,0.05183711,0.00076762773,0.00014210252,0.000008091636,0.000017751692,0.3963274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854493,0.00054728176,0.00017439704,0.00012921076,0.0003677682,0.00023641252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847484,0.0008894508,0.00004504979,0.00022900711,0.00027008847,0.0000915918],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017331772,0.0000446809,0.000095451505,0.000027834569,0.0007584536,0.00015882611,0.00022580673,0.000036916048,0.021438219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030202668,0.000040260446,0.00003839097,0.00097340246,0.00021682848,0.0006735263,0.000019051484,0.00033111422,0.0070748474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.14070374e-7,0.000028380082,0.000012352738,0.00003791585,0.0000024435649,3.701599e-7,0.000704325,5.6900236e-9,5.163971e-7,0.7194551,0.27467063,0.005087793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022722,0.0000059029876,0.000008153017,0.00019565714,0.0000073823303,0.0000015153948,0.00010322844,9.3986455e-7,0.0000014246646,0.0005958052,0.99900436,0.000052913878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121201396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040137503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7243337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050027575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013117964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99369824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252861249","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6253.2012.01742.x","title":"Traditional Knowledge and Humanities: A Perspective by a Blackfoot","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chinese Philosophy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Ohio Humanities","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Digital humanities; Sociology; Humanities; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08576290827200124,"score_gpt":0.3879769039438697,"score_spread":0.30221399567186846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252861249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23768672,0.0036058237,0.00005421495,0.09779608,0.0011956492,0.00009115309,0.000017272652,0.000014357672,0.65953875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939785,0.00009516701,0.00015317832,0.0008673416,0.0042935307,0.0000022620288,0.0000016619177,0.0000061683218,0.00060219894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992274,0.00013476203,0.00021242967,0.000050146522,0.00024841944,0.00012685728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987642,0.00033014044,0.00023258606,0.00004301101,0.0004966644,0.00013336824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069210835,0.00007075385,0.00011581523,0.00014008388,0.0003401704,0.0000899872,0.00010126953,0.000042019667,0.0004321516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007687241,0.000056730554,0.00005632515,0.00028733295,0.00019088927,0.0016399359,0.000008731828,0.00031712404,0.00001951968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020406978,0.00043899985,0.0031720174,0.0000052867335,0.000042598866,5.4215394e-7,0.117939726,1.2794769e-7,0.00005999112,0.8530084,0.0251981,0.00011379828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041926315,0.00008903591,0.0076670614,0.000019712204,0.000028485765,0.00004414686,0.0090129515,0.0000017825777,0.0000066635325,0.53354496,0.44903338,0.00013254271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000085027365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002264249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75629175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012451594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033419667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47317567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253985490","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198724452.003.0035","title":"The Right to Know in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statute; Legislation; Political science; Jurisprudence; Common law; Law; Freedom of information; Position (finance); Economics","score_opus":0.02739981431482593,"score_gpt":0.322948777306729,"score_spread":0.2955489629919031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253985490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010462936,0.00005375279,0.0000034172429,0.4378105,0.0003737857,0.00024556383,0.000012367479,0.00000825381,0.5613877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013586438,0.00072657055,0.000016946993,0.0038480232,0.00025153975,0.000009163172,0.000017637227,0.000008219123,0.99376327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990845,0.000090524,0.00021833775,0.00013714866,0.00027173187,0.00019778541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795437,0.0015268008,0.00011185131,0.00017015319,0.00010523742,0.00013156765],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070179324,0.00011208686,0.00011471734,0.000082022576,0.0004897542,0.00024015066,0.00023827475,0.00010155342,0.0023864158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031028167,0.000051062114,0.000019027757,0.00014153677,0.00023842246,0.000103760285,0.000025657793,0.00033088037,0.00010900319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012294645,0.000001041178,0.000039241575,3.555827e-7,0.000009027967,6.3998056e-7,0.0023660804,2.5070085e-7,3.5856676e-8,0.53126,0.46496713,0.0013438975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002057893,0.00000431313,0.00007170959,0.000021607524,0.000009895181,5.3680316e-7,0.00059106475,6.419787e-7,4.574812e-7,0.047276054,0.95172185,0.00009610722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97914743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4867547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016179073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021586732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99852556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255014462","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.20","title":"Judging Rationally","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminate; Positivism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.048127391765847786,"score_gpt":0.3742530337472996,"score_spread":0.32612564198145183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255014462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06728176,0.0012805214,0.0010567373,0.30307353,0.0038118768,0.00008166347,0.000010655664,0.000012853033,0.62339044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98960704,0.000044597193,0.0017804382,0.004736594,0.00056849624,8.0234173e-7,0.0000016738134,0.0000044976796,0.003255879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990829,0.00014596782,0.00024455978,0.000069229245,0.00026707907,0.00019021478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797,0.0001792691,0.00017486648,0.000088694156,0.0011583205,0.00042889107],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007956353,0.00004401893,0.00007812471,0.00008491325,0.0007003165,0.00038210678,0.00021130744,0.000046487345,0.0022104778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014716776,0.000048427697,0.000046434772,0.00042629926,0.00017499678,0.0010181614,0.000004059832,0.00030236927,0.000053353695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010894171,0.000009585783,0.0017686854,0.0000020129078,0.000010833775,0.000116584975,0.00787084,0.000016767404,0.00011264772,0.97541887,0.013681741,0.0009903708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060791648,0.000006887408,0.0017340269,0.000029534986,0.000009542728,0.000056952304,0.0022941919,0.0000014788885,0.00020401955,0.0058501326,0.9896913,0.000061114246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034112632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41813675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019089901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019587656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255504285","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.26140","title":"Mcmurtry, Hon. (Roland) Roy, (born 31 May 1932), Senior Counsel, Hull &amp; Hull LLP, since 2014; Chief Justice of Ontario, 1996–2007 (Associate Chief Justice, 1991–94, Chief Justice, 1994–96, Ontario Court of Justice (General Division))","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Hull; Law; Management; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.033490307173257565,"score_gpt":0.3334561056208852,"score_spread":0.2999657984476276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255504285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042949308,0.0066499985,0.00096134125,0.008089264,0.036733616,0.0035287347,0.003888912,0.00044161116,0.89675725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033488795,0.028728336,0.006193527,0.00533577,0.012864714,0.00019784033,0.006476255,0.00045377298,0.90626097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845354,0.001261215,0.0040442096,0.0023701633,0.0048511657,0.0029378408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841415,0.003647104,0.0057782065,0.0022508453,0.002864727,0.0013175674],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058903694,0.0020196075,0.0032822094,0.0015046468,0.0033573608,0.0009831801,0.0029463808,0.0030153322,0.0060443436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039710826,0.0020737564,0.0009840258,0.0029039355,0.0016204023,0.001861588,0.00054929126,0.006704824,0.0008176385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000616463,0.0022504665,0.004637025,0.003082814,0.0010058241,0.000050444294,0.03467356,0.00024679795,0.000025796064,0.01410877,0.93684804,0.002453976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021439607,0.00033678542,0.019643173,0.0018177348,0.011283446,0.000028243132,0.0037305767,0.000045801535,0.00002040666,0.0003281479,0.95849615,0.0021255505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7164098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85708505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14067528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004730699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023642613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255928898","doi":"10.22215/etd/2012-07073","title":"Law, morality and social discourse : jury nullification in a Canadian context","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Nullification; Morality; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.058408198294557526,"score_gpt":0.43480001768781884,"score_spread":0.37639181939326133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255928898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17786214,0.00015561997,8.6655643e-7,0.088527136,0.0013405407,0.00044497073,0.00003608318,0.000034442794,0.7315982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96163046,0.000018042494,0.000025966161,0.0011684289,0.00031617537,0.000052576506,0.00074538373,0.0000097166085,0.03603327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898,0.00014957435,0.00021837607,0.00016316658,0.0001863218,0.00030256505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936295,0.000081405226,0.00014066699,0.00008125706,0.00016899516,0.00016470713],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082459947,0.00009891776,0.00012530219,0.0001685549,0.0005798011,0.00020996036,0.00010222533,0.00028306426,0.0014886372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021050304,0.000107690656,0.000025075435,0.00030386948,0.000104834035,0.00071603735,0.0000028560014,0.00036971958,0.00011409077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053546714,0.00004029831,0.0020386816,0.00001260989,0.0000057031166,2.193501e-7,0.06545467,1.2282277e-8,0.0000046544696,0.92014277,0.0032232737,0.009071757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006937078,0.0000021348033,0.09291491,0.0000090984,0.00001885215,1.014794e-7,0.09042758,0.000001202107,0.0000043177956,0.0007633231,0.8156346,0.00015450391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9765547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99860877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9193795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032679018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030246752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255936986","doi":"10.4135/9781483392240.n76","title":"Correctional Service Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"The SAGE Encyclopedia of Criminal Psychology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Geography; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.051442109621985824,"score_gpt":0.3850358573864176,"score_spread":0.3335937477644318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255936986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015336862,0.0010195939,0.000056532575,0.050139938,0.026098458,0.00030425287,0.00013956349,0.000021452293,0.92068654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021574968,0.06822512,0.00018570667,0.026381673,0.006474276,0.00012260818,0.0003889378,0.000057958358,0.87658876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762225,0.0005769611,0.00046050863,0.00031281146,0.00066382904,0.00036363737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972676,0.001085476,0.00056531315,0.00048746925,0.0005008972,0.000093267845],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069571106,0.00020475188,0.0003247578,0.00012031312,0.0003803597,0.000036828525,0.00084493647,0.00035080858,0.007471707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066799374,0.00016719557,0.000073085386,0.0006225233,0.0002526484,0.00017046896,0.00005136694,0.0013169042,0.00020793942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034272685,0.000065658925,0.0000861836,0.000071899376,0.000044567994,0.000002404392,0.00963049,0.000001396217,1.5022513e-7,0.0030252526,0.9360177,0.051020045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012365484,0.000028066255,0.0023271171,0.00006023929,0.00013338668,0.000010678018,0.008212621,7.882694e-7,2.9955535e-7,0.00062274316,0.9883041,0.00017629916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7990839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83576405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06720553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020038093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011326088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255938873","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1021","title":"PHILOSOPHICAL LEGAL ETHICS AND PERSONAL INTEGRITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Democracy; Political science; Legal process; Sociology; Compromise; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.051558578290668754,"score_gpt":0.35012770066188137,"score_spread":0.29856912237121264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255938873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14610368,0.00007142857,0.00017294288,0.26113343,0.0009732907,0.00004821889,0.000006408102,0.000017519764,0.5914731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958428,0.00013465944,0.0022866018,0.000387822,0.0003601092,1.1546428e-8,6.582915e-7,0.0000016575223,0.0009856541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933815,0.00018781156,0.00006692804,0.0000645328,0.00024737045,0.00009520099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914116,0.000230376,0.00009266151,0.000043553388,0.00035069755,0.00014154224],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012349177,0.000037367936,0.000061853636,0.000013185888,0.0017838889,0.0000877951,0.00014282604,0.00014382842,0.003743702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005353498,0.0000409942,0.000035885525,0.00003141861,0.0005921087,0.0012566985,0.000022634742,0.0021107285,0.0000047218437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018817776,0.000047503006,0.0004409352,0.0000016471676,0.000013475821,0.000004246005,0.036764678,3.523007e-8,0.00013935324,0.9602637,0.0011809671,0.0011246386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019229058,0.000023657389,0.0024262122,0.000005165713,0.00001796077,0.000029479887,0.036014758,0.0000096837075,0.0000051978673,0.0052292636,0.9559865,0.00005982966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20910428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5122783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95503443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008017231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006916644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255978256","doi":"10.14296/ac.v2003i47.1034","title":"Laying the foundations for law library co-operation around the world","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Amicus Curiae","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Starr Foundation","keywords":"Law library; Event (particle physics); Gee; Law; Library science; Information transfer; Engineering; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.067824577490244,"score_gpt":0.40590736101194114,"score_spread":0.33808278352169713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255978256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041655446,0.00006406532,0.00075209094,0.2261089,0.0011928247,0.0006467013,0.000012920054,0.0000760352,0.76698095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95608544,0.000022530923,0.00071119907,0.012140659,0.0007136518,0.0001632564,0.000048668287,0.000011713591,0.030102907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913144,0.0002965637,0.000157534,0.00010814017,0.00014486475,0.00016146833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834716,0.0012828972,0.00009100861,0.0001853653,0.00006346747,0.000030086734],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080987543,0.000058261106,0.000047425052,0.000032737353,0.0030027544,0.00087478495,0.00019678571,0.000031632622,0.0011003905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042968776,0.000036730453,0.000039661452,0.00039040565,0.00022083372,0.0013165592,0.000007489534,0.00017719994,0.00016540276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018030687,0.00002336896,0.00034223884,9.745667e-7,0.000008457373,3.67091e-8,0.0046035773,0.000011908151,0.00002704968,0.93694633,0.0576342,0.0004000738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084346444,0.000004689706,0.00012476846,0.0000021917633,0.000012827033,5.050938e-7,0.008314272,0.00002726674,0.000096593205,0.030682515,0.96059155,0.000058495738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077357405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037015441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95191985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035938036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051508436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280572051","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v13i1.14603","title":"Jury Strikes Back","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Economic Justice; Jury trial; Political science; Civil procedure; Pandemic; Law; Criminology; Public administration; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.12184795208378905,"score_gpt":0.4381770377505677,"score_spread":0.31632908566677864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280572051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5522223,0.008298705,0.00005362152,0.33673748,0.0080162445,0.00020505981,0.000018107994,0.000028877206,0.09441958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977203,0.0005247643,0.00020227068,0.0015829251,0.0007411965,0.000004655629,4.845037e-7,0.0000057387288,0.019734943],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986673,0.00030171103,0.00032243386,0.00006327993,0.0005026193,0.0001426287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882096,0.00028163433,0.00039036237,0.00006256406,0.00038799885,0.000056494875],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012896224,0.00005746248,0.00014930883,0.000105731335,0.0009963765,0.000119243065,0.00023776584,0.000013547171,0.001021639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051408465,0.000051039377,0.00006554703,0.00038782324,0.0001314458,0.000796144,0.00007044408,0.00043941007,0.00003687111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001762556,0.0006705133,0.05724799,0.00003575699,0.0007704992,0.00009455405,0.2363481,0.00017260342,0.00022996632,0.085969,0.59417385,0.024110915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014553744,0.00009262108,0.0020590196,0.0000066671346,0.000019993262,0.000024002384,0.065088525,1.3965658e-7,0.000014361001,0.00043022196,0.932063,0.0000559216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029332566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038470104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4249807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018032125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060248753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281682254","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7284","title":"Practising an Anti-Colonial Citizenship Education Through a Blended Learning Course on Aboriginal Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Citizenship; Colonialism; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.06902634390145324,"score_gpt":0.45732634177729153,"score_spread":0.3882999978758383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281682254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5066345,0.000037754333,0.00010946341,0.05366133,0.002817498,0.00065226364,0.00001832129,0.00013301717,0.4359359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900874,0.000010593887,0.0011625586,0.005397898,0.0009728788,0.000082061604,0.000026334,0.000021603497,0.0022386604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978398,0.0006182715,0.00027274285,0.00029377145,0.0006948917,0.00028050985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848795,0.00044980305,0.00034937513,0.00022993675,0.00035703043,0.0001259083],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010749398,0.00011305352,0.00015127337,0.00013397515,0.0016515381,0.0004148993,0.00050184573,0.000058530375,0.0015072317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007355677,0.00013756793,0.00003685818,0.0009085018,0.00012715721,0.001570843,0.00005916395,0.00070929906,0.000055260694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023336198,0.0011406037,0.0020067585,0.00004667329,0.00004321945,0.0000056187178,0.05139049,0.0028047306,0.0007087877,0.9194285,0.018859599,0.0033316326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030077528,0.00029050707,0.010373688,0.000038452312,0.0001886409,0.000005210029,0.029806064,0.00003259599,0.0003496103,0.002200992,0.95614535,0.00026813758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009675255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005639983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9372857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021697006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045700823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281772468","doi":"10.7202/1089685ar","title":"\"Let Us See What Is Meant by the Word Recorde\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archivaria","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Scope (computer science); History; Point (geometry); Historical record; Perception; Sociology; Law; Media studies; Political science; Epistemology; Biography; Art history","score_opus":0.03746755535791548,"score_gpt":0.35271877134794855,"score_spread":0.3152512159900331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281772468","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012921979,0.00015891522,0.00011323527,0.5053145,0.002206628,0.00022711325,0.000029043655,0.000053771902,0.4789748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93513066,0.00023720266,0.00042936802,0.02870553,0.00029576442,0.0001014627,0.000032518667,0.000010421302,0.035057053],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868655,0.0005147832,0.00013363702,0.00014205708,0.00033258484,0.000190395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990612,0.00054006046,0.000087159824,0.00022208718,0.000038127713,0.000051356685],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010436161,0.00005281795,0.000052866326,0.000037073667,0.0019682306,0.00039055318,0.00038059833,0.000014026567,0.010124199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026268009,0.000043898246,0.000033247474,0.00054438994,0.00010697828,0.0005608796,0.000090135676,0.0004186271,0.00020099344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000990123,0.000065095024,0.0002928811,7.0908936e-7,0.000015336307,6.341172e-7,0.07581011,0.0000032297564,0.0000622692,0.4361617,0.4382455,0.049332634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006219616,0.000011911137,0.000543197,0.000001655633,0.000006915274,0.0000017725207,0.017774591,0.000022466505,0.000009447073,0.040698733,0.94080365,0.00006345332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009719022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025887822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9222087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062517254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004258556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283311748","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.06","title":"Power, Gender, and Race in the Legal Profession","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Caucus; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Race (biology); Power (physics); Event (particle physics); Law; Political science; History; Gender studies; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.04146646887058816,"score_gpt":0.32968739872032826,"score_spread":0.2882209298497401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283311748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6653923,0.00076803414,0.0000031192237,0.25394842,0.00056552066,0.00015610688,0.000006123062,0.0000020217135,0.07915835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98817813,0.00006931927,0.000014781123,0.008728816,0.000106774074,0.0000147473465,7.98938e-7,0.0000041817016,0.002882476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986383,0.00074202934,0.00018458643,0.0000635053,0.00014682,0.00022475705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916553,0.0003574511,0.00016105942,0.00008234487,0.000056234094,0.00017736954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047695776,0.000048781687,0.00010719367,0.000100119,0.0011070084,0.00025007248,0.00024378493,0.000024080986,0.0003650934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033732527,0.00003371758,0.000022931034,0.0003262799,0.00024763757,0.00037796618,0.000017383702,0.00061754405,0.0000012044684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020427213,0.000010917026,0.0008175702,0.000002599395,0.000007932401,0.000018854009,0.26044953,0.0000032879466,0.0000010447659,0.73598164,0.002369621,0.00031659406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045169468,0.000033136235,0.0027027333,0.000006730673,0.0000048855936,0.00012114191,0.24453676,0.0000039243228,2.899657e-7,0.04436214,0.70772874,0.000047794663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021126918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053363703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70535916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024653258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016181899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283317485","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.04","title":"What Do You Call an Indigenous Woman with a PhD in Law? Resisting the Subjugation of Indigenous Expertise in Legal Spheres","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenization; Colonialism; Legal education; Racism; Decolonization; Sociology; Law; Traditional knowledge; Political science; Anthropology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03228845169723625,"score_gpt":0.3020444394008083,"score_spread":0.269755987703572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283317485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97555304,0.0010841627,0.0000024180695,0.01864659,0.0002358527,0.00026088904,0.000007340105,0.0000027017265,0.004207017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707484,0.00006984546,0.000026606338,0.0021064328,0.00010527464,0.000032909644,0.00000280613,0.0000101822025,0.000571103],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982554,0.00072284293,0.00034539454,0.0001067864,0.00021871856,0.00035090488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892026,0.00023530057,0.0003763916,0.00014547992,0.00011505732,0.00020753333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003145978,0.00008144209,0.00019571833,0.00017414946,0.0009958608,0.0004501537,0.00035509028,0.000037983642,0.00013972442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019010395,0.000060605238,0.000027490376,0.00063054805,0.0004610868,0.001102036,0.000015162156,0.00057265244,4.5065767e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012955708,0.000049160106,0.008671077,0.00000838995,0.000020956839,0.00006494,0.80714643,0.00019473795,0.000006009069,0.18113738,0.00005148143,0.0025198578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015297537,0.00031660293,0.008316492,0.0001250895,0.000018389761,0.00017885736,0.9079819,0.000021278453,0.000012411133,0.018518822,0.06278103,0.00019938078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34530038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91060036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008320106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027626057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7659457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283817272","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v31i1.6441","title":"What Can the Legal Profession Do For Us? Formerly Incarcerated Attorneys and the Practice of Law as a Strengths-Based Endeavour","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal profession; Practice of law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02558640163852531,"score_gpt":0.39227097272191586,"score_spread":0.36668457108339053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283817272","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23665565,0.0005089617,0.00029680892,0.7423232,0.0020265128,0.0012170637,0.000026075933,0.0000162155,0.016929498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99057114,0.000121392644,0.00092885725,0.0070935646,0.00017135368,0.00007100579,0.0000036303531,0.000012955228,0.0010261011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996723,0.0015775128,0.0005388869,0.00012677402,0.0008181258,0.00021572666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927071,0.00475675,0.0014852469,0.00019649329,0.00076065963,0.00009377962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006140236,0.00010952199,0.00021278433,0.0001238794,0.0020527143,0.00045229716,0.00042136616,0.00005338572,0.00013232783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004447028,0.000065939224,0.00012186077,0.0005430734,0.00039207836,0.0013635871,0.000049551323,0.0010344321,0.0000011058868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027043226,0.00069971156,0.00030419359,0.000017115648,0.00019212914,0.000004500246,0.09109277,0.0004249861,0.00015410892,0.871148,0.0253255,0.007932655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021640195,0.0004788688,0.00010324633,0.000035589022,0.00013421428,0.000018315422,0.19235407,0.00018621903,0.00015489067,0.0015089768,0.802772,0.000089590394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033812204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007333309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86963904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020223235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002524046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284889561","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7389","title":"Integrating Social Work Within Legal Clinics: An Inter-Professional Perspective to Address Social-Legal Needs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ontario Trillium Foundation","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Social work; Public relations; Legal profession; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.08879246285694156,"score_gpt":0.45659572673884535,"score_spread":0.36780326388190376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284889561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48915052,0.000027664162,0.00063873065,0.18159673,0.008058678,0.0014108303,0.00014363116,0.0002363988,0.31873682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764437,6.051493e-7,0.0013969716,0.008082029,0.0023299512,0.0001779171,0.00001805376,0.000034454002,0.011516313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683195,0.0008309531,0.00058609725,0.00038813075,0.0009523771,0.00041048805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977465,0.0004777495,0.00044548724,0.00020192903,0.0009045153,0.00022379693],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021079395,0.00018385451,0.00028826162,0.00048390444,0.0030334345,0.00073763006,0.0012198089,0.0001244996,0.0028082118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023875493,0.00020416024,0.00010463407,0.0030737305,0.00020479482,0.002068175,0.0005205687,0.0012193802,0.00006558031],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044187607,0.0004929985,0.0010379418,0.000020461708,0.000052759973,0.000005073862,0.39118218,0.00017691501,0.00014537554,0.5629338,0.04084388,0.0026667155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031094765,0.00017011154,0.0060309796,0.000037897476,0.00012572894,0.0000013368672,0.6114184,0.000030793795,0.00004536578,0.0008652301,0.3806029,0.00036028065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005573244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011966886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5620686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005601877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00222295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285025152","doi":"10.22215/etd/2022-15063","title":"Unsettling the Settler Colonial Structure of Canadian Legal Education: An Examination of Three Law Schools’ Engagement with Reconciliation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Indigenous; Political science; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Legal history; Racism; Geography","score_opus":0.037770980688423716,"score_gpt":0.349256136148216,"score_spread":0.3114851554597923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285025152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6246135,0.00008495642,0.000014058624,0.02276445,0.0030784854,0.0014136605,0.00020329238,0.000036034315,0.34779155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98702663,0.000020202293,0.0006283849,0.0006017317,0.00030902325,0.00007392033,0.0028325198,0.00001917963,0.0084883785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791443,0.0005656818,0.00041530808,0.00023463057,0.00069148606,0.0001784538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975318,0.00018452376,0.0006777279,0.00029329018,0.0012132112,0.000099448596],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012744875,0.0001437394,0.00016766113,0.0004867766,0.0012400261,0.0001789434,0.0003589479,0.00017232857,0.0056241914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037647143,0.0001197732,0.000037982507,0.0015497755,0.00009767746,0.0009066586,0.00000741778,0.00076883845,0.0000029232015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039746847,0.000098592864,0.00047052337,0.000048270627,0.000063294116,2.1223813e-7,0.052802324,0.000076538905,0.00015627417,0.9313537,0.0033867352,0.011503823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002220529,0.00016923247,0.04700312,0.00006318344,0.00018012033,0.0000013361678,0.21929862,0.0000231045,0.0006408824,0.0026900587,0.72938937,0.00031890246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7715153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9894633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9286636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046951216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014469322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285223880","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_32","title":"Correction to: Academic Integrity in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yorkville University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Personal Integrity; Structural integrity; Scientific integrity; Political science; Engineering ethics; Library science; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11757264422837024,"score_gpt":0.42325951147802565,"score_spread":0.30568686724965544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285223880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023275423,0.0005093428,0.00000317617,0.37864694,0.00957116,0.00040954925,0.000073396106,0.00001116724,0.60844773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56307197,0.0015509811,0.000080723614,0.013705953,0.0007229108,0.00012541917,0.00017790063,0.00002433643,0.4205398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755174,0.00045485402,0.0005690857,0.0004059261,0.00076097925,0.00025739195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99380964,0.005051267,0.00024399269,0.0001683939,0.0005473148,0.00017939706],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036902744,0.00020263887,0.00026068336,0.0003987492,0.0006042674,0.00009697541,0.00032620557,0.00050845125,0.006564311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012740982,0.00023915309,0.000039316605,0.00031333088,0.0001678875,0.00039025059,0.000078011806,0.020939602,0.000035220048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015289843,0.00003476745,0.0030186733,0.000012469638,0.000007717726,0.00000113287,0.021310542,0.0000035000946,9.216803e-7,0.8674336,0.1039879,0.004173487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008109791,0.000015625674,0.0112966485,0.00019393202,0.000006164819,0.0000027712044,0.007902284,0.00000791508,6.068034e-7,0.06976261,0.91048545,0.00024487588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9828295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8064976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041672257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057547174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285655012","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.12911000.v1","title":"Modulating the Depth of Scrutiny in Judicial Review: Scope, Grounds, Intensity, Context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Home Office; University of Cambridge; McGill University","keywords":"Scrutiny; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Intensity (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; History; Computer science; Optics; Physics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.1605661895775027,"score_gpt":0.4350352372672065,"score_spread":0.2744690476897038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285655012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045490325,0.0042447858,0.0003740654,0.44085017,0.0018076919,0.0012529389,0.000007742343,0.00006340711,0.5468502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746473,0.003553582,0.00059532595,0.019869026,0.00044549105,0.000036348316,0.00002185147,0.000009645244,0.00082142535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980668,0.0004450151,0.000623,0.0002617523,0.00042500964,0.00017841585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980786,0.00041080898,0.0005367946,0.00028626187,0.00063136005,0.00005618945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021505754,0.0001237916,0.000352893,0.000075904856,0.00024846647,0.00014465903,0.00053724786,0.00014170737,0.00057653204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00681273,0.00009721903,0.000090219866,0.00086906995,0.00025444504,0.0002326489,0.00038557829,0.0011588172,0.000049701914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033545835,0.00020874107,0.008511788,0.00076828536,0.000091577946,0.000003280736,0.048090376,0.000033486744,0.000040604915,0.58986324,0.297407,0.054948058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004072458,0.000042311167,0.02973166,0.005452461,0.00017878745,0.0000023578818,0.053411875,0.00041498867,0.000093227005,0.049534123,0.8599955,0.0007354823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09948951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0498762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97009826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109863744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001857363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9674611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286009277","doi":"10.29173/wclawr69","title":"The Reliability of Expert Evidence in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Federal Rules of Evidence; Conviction; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Accountability; Public relations; Engineering","score_opus":0.0852581681269184,"score_gpt":0.3916854446548383,"score_spread":0.3064272765279199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286009277","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011684242,0.07893764,0.0000071388945,0.8470735,0.0021368882,0.0012267206,0.000006951684,0.000022907905,0.058904003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575206,0.031290382,0.0000083852165,0.010215977,0.00004962995,0.00020418811,0.0000013678215,0.000003135865,0.0007063195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762744,0.0014163632,0.0003298938,0.00009642456,0.00040897215,0.0001209136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789554,0.0013698231,0.00020855617,0.00032036338,0.00018037953,0.000025326817],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043523354,0.000043832708,0.000099044664,0.000008123409,0.0011940665,0.000024434015,0.00036787405,0.000008478688,0.0016037036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017689314,0.000028025732,0.00002791479,0.00079183653,0.00016957567,0.00024975446,0.000047484657,0.00028921754,0.000008224774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019445688,0.00005410059,0.001483454,0.00013521951,0.000010372324,5.5438886e-7,0.0060602697,0.00008564711,0.000013674401,0.89168197,0.08503724,0.0154180275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021996331,0.000005846886,0.00065497635,0.00009654405,0.0000064859464,8.078788e-7,0.0034089445,0.000008490515,0.0000040802206,0.00032155513,0.9954354,0.000034849163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.977744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9553094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94583637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068903354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033386343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287183108","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4750519","title":"+27789189922 Win court cases with powerful effective spells &amp; get back your lover in,Churchill Dauphin Flin Flon Kildonan Saint Boniface Swan River Thompson Winnipeg York Factory","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; Factory (object-oriented programming); Management; History; Art history; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05483008121982439,"score_gpt":0.31743149516120706,"score_spread":0.26260141394138264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287183108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42688623,0.0002913354,0.001371621,0.022312485,0.0005981504,0.0014751736,0.00037587094,0.00040888853,0.54628026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669112,0.00012905186,0.00097503775,0.00097003323,0.00040918522,8.223808e-8,0.001135566,0.00065064116,0.02881922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963868,0.0014796609,0.00033980006,0.0005934915,0.00066139764,0.00053881604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978098,0.00023911124,0.00020994137,0.00049559254,0.0009808334,0.00026467963],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013576397,0.00022161934,0.00023103399,0.00027443492,0.00130408,0.0011674631,0.00062633137,0.00012915565,0.04466058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002395124,0.00022716678,0.0000624605,0.0016676701,0.00046518902,0.0008458877,0.0003569503,0.00078520225,0.024314234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076245377,0.0022854796,0.0020427448,0.00015500878,0.00028378516,0.0003209608,0.17856087,0.000957775,0.004254199,0.039971102,0.72017676,0.05022888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006074511,0.00012484664,0.011922052,0.000067243775,0.000019631085,0.00006790127,0.00663156,0.00002229288,0.0002439984,0.00017118949,0.9798237,0.00029812363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026412979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005217203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54002494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007373641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012930071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288401483","doi":"","title":"\"Transysstemic Programme at McGill and the De-nationalization of Legal Education\"","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.022228732732592283,"score_gpt":0.29625473431146343,"score_spread":0.27402600157887114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288401483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07927696,0.002393709,0.02719305,0.35907745,0.0011565586,0.0023853926,0.00010713448,0.0001954747,0.5282143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493309,0.0011199476,0.009869555,0.0005580901,0.000052391708,0.00018628652,0.000362669,0.000024371164,0.03849575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992115,0.0062755025,0.00049743004,0.00037942833,0.0004912439,0.0002413828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99197733,0.0028157684,0.0007446025,0.0007954278,0.0035546208,0.000112220834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009939357,0.00016731682,0.00023398433,0.00015839454,0.00086009107,0.0003583007,0.00066913397,0.00023610912,0.00025783878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053199413,0.00015536089,0.00011339067,0.00052163214,0.00071459997,0.0003151229,0.00029666122,0.0005086246,0.000019048282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014240725,0.00024159058,0.0015862965,0.00012300015,0.000038005513,6.589874e-8,0.03016773,0.000031543503,0.000069778085,0.9531119,0.0012959839,0.01331987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011975789,4.738835e-7,0.00508702,0.0010762165,0.0001583293,0.000010782081,0.004938937,0.004766463,0.0018029055,0.03896189,0.94151217,0.00048722402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018697146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011372439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9402162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030072426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028129169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98783743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289450564","doi":"10.7202/1090693ar","title":"Réglementation et innovation dans le secteur juridique : les Alternative Business Structures dans le Legal Services Act 2007","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02238493158247224,"score_gpt":0.3156676177696979,"score_spread":0.29328268618722564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289450564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80832344,0.00023951728,0.0056112655,0.09074636,0.0032045203,0.0005360731,0.00028992095,0.000099299235,0.09094959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710571,0.0001872115,0.0012418462,0.0025828953,0.0012354656,0.00015903547,0.00091196556,0.0000467254,0.022577716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996768,0.0011548512,0.0006301494,0.0004669662,0.00051167555,0.00046835275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795735,0.00023408288,0.00077420654,0.00028921833,0.0006555671,0.00008956834],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016511598,0.00020970369,0.00024124632,0.0003334746,0.002139741,0.00046011075,0.0005560402,0.00014493952,0.0016072139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023381018,0.0003425187,0.000077654346,0.0037682573,0.00024552175,0.002697955,0.00013826297,0.00092060375,0.000035533452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003667341,0.00035959034,0.005279682,0.00017394357,0.00008556067,0.000019445719,0.05615128,0.005375913,0.0039284956,0.9207807,0.0026490586,0.0051596197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097305,0.00013772192,0.10137586,0.00010786643,0.000119651326,0.00013155951,0.10414996,0.0012784695,0.0031564413,0.10646966,0.68130606,0.00079366245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13939461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024785329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8143111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011846032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034517893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290190544","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4179703","title":"Civil Lay Judges: A Global Overview","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03437606613178686,"score_gpt":0.37625993770371785,"score_spread":0.341883871571931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290190544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05739031,0.020441657,0.00076890114,0.40518585,0.0032161516,0.00035582308,0.000021231752,0.00015910825,0.51246095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98131245,0.00396539,0.00003673542,0.003038819,0.0005389462,0.000017496464,0.0000047427047,0.0000070787314,0.01107832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974888,0.00048145212,0.00018487137,0.00011275746,0.0005125525,0.0012195572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994694,0.00007023367,0.00016388633,0.00010294616,0.00011422602,0.00007928045],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004096173,0.000064634725,0.00007875434,0.00005491759,0.0021971185,0.00016967337,0.0003535216,0.000027878812,0.004261289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038432045,0.00006726248,0.0000715646,0.0009698692,0.00005108706,0.00046995544,0.000045731787,0.0022481256,0.0000911007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007617657,0.00007634543,0.001997643,7.3531504e-7,0.00003264617,0.000001094022,0.0020940902,0.000010791013,0.000002100493,0.97837347,0.009837659,0.0075658225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012608005,0.000048226706,0.00030197747,0.0000011008174,0.000011406514,0.00008416648,0.028013881,0.0000017313846,1.7099867e-7,0.2939212,0.6774254,0.00006468561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002568864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026392786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9239222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034106323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018576406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293205783","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4060297","title":"What is Scholarly Legal Writing? An Introduction to Different Perspectives (On US Qualified Immunity Doctrine) (Presentation Slides)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Doctrine; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.027662464424988008,"score_gpt":0.37680801121961977,"score_spread":0.3491455467946318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293205783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7469187,0.0003055894,0.00034893895,0.24912341,0.0014593799,0.000228479,0.0000032303158,0.00004734257,0.0015649655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98882556,0.001125497,0.0000392979,0.0016624625,0.0024075035,0.000041717132,0.000018775514,0.000016051696,0.0058631334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591035,0.0015265734,0.00034208954,0.00030188067,0.0008672681,0.0010518645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987032,0.00014087113,0.00026079707,0.00025248266,0.000489565,0.0001531216],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053037987,0.00013236163,0.0001309789,0.00037488627,0.00356142,0.0023551902,0.00042567757,0.000048128946,0.0012650209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007874792,0.00013847632,0.000078868754,0.00093814597,0.00005508233,0.00635487,0.00005124087,0.0043970356,0.00003216689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019221679,0.00049322436,0.00052695343,0.0000012144244,0.000066077,9.704578e-7,0.07202576,0.00011445548,0.00090783415,0.91194093,0.0019401497,0.011790202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036828176,0.0006179182,0.0018606044,0.0000039681695,0.000023996983,0.000061538245,0.7767327,0.000014296669,0.00014056951,0.025304195,0.19467399,0.0001979678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004641951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040944316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88663673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033868097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032546422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294351289","doi":"10.36834/cmej.75111","title":"Going virtual advances justice in expected and unexpected ways","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Education Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Computer science; Criminology; Data science; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.022034035285432477,"score_gpt":0.35542022755876446,"score_spread":0.333386192273332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294351289","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19014633,0.0028657145,0.00016760046,0.6571797,0.013054239,0.00031307057,0.000011035127,0.00004985928,0.13621245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96784467,0.00037567064,0.00044806895,0.028069172,0.0012126114,0.000049177957,0.000013933918,0.000009564819,0.001977119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825466,0.0004050595,0.0002783556,0.00013325282,0.00063245423,0.00029624678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967693,0.0002499857,0.000120584606,0.00007107768,0.0002121356,0.0025768995],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014323824,0.00006327333,0.000083469524,0.00048500963,0.0018893504,0.0001800753,0.00023089739,0.00006216069,0.0422966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025135273,0.00007213407,0.000017039727,0.0011315409,0.0001447633,0.0006202857,0.000016070939,0.0012711176,0.000017277644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020400337,0.00030123617,0.0038114365,0.000009979112,0.000015498095,0.00005553541,0.11643013,0.000027220001,0.000011353846,0.40340543,0.256515,0.21939677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001557057,0.000018826273,0.0013694966,0.0000133565545,0.0000072134217,0.000087103086,0.115529895,0.00003930858,3.7962e-7,0.0010755067,0.8816211,0.00008209914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040684815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20310791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77769834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008549515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08770721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294903864","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-11810-4_8","title":"Vulnerability and Student Perceptions of the Ethics of SoTL","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Context (archaeology); Perception; Power (physics); Research ethics; Sociology; Population; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Geography; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.133501359647462,"score_gpt":0.4709957454339686,"score_spread":0.3374943857865066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294903864","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031068202,0.00095630164,0.000004739887,0.55914724,0.0016083064,0.0005447493,0.00019914494,0.0000069102175,0.4064644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92498034,0.0018363334,0.00011337975,0.0016646548,0.00015841801,0.000030836014,0.000029180626,0.000009596345,0.07117723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764305,0.000841998,0.00047751912,0.00022132802,0.0007181108,0.000097987075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921518,0.00614132,0.00038933838,0.00022862796,0.0010339927,0.000054934648],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060411072,0.00011842323,0.00021423455,0.00012073879,0.0008783991,0.00005085852,0.00026381447,0.00049576565,0.0032259352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008801806,0.000104020546,0.00006846465,0.00012712923,0.0014258174,0.00018406147,0.00012171528,0.0076332004,0.0000019482713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044890985,0.00012252225,0.0052230754,0.000050996554,0.000016603428,2.5982102e-8,0.112056494,5.990588e-7,0.0000071045924,0.88121337,0.00081467483,0.00049004616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011089168,0.000033289307,0.09565747,0.00015905302,0.00003470926,0.0000013553341,0.025815548,0.0000010986215,0.0000021426508,0.30983362,0.5682012,0.00014965389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008565295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018297467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8939122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018061683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006380628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295207474","doi":"10.32843/2663-6085/2022/49.2.23","title":"FEATURES OF FUTURE LAWYERS’ PRACTICAL TRAINING AT THE UNIVERSITIES OF CANADA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Innovate Pedagogy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Training (meteorology); Political science; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering; Geography; Medicine; Meteorology","score_opus":0.05646636160914772,"score_gpt":0.3964863275569627,"score_spread":0.34001996594781503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295207474","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34096587,0.0001392257,0.000006267909,0.37934223,0.0014950143,0.00011564335,0.00007352287,0.000013979649,0.27784824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768986,0.000008838078,0.000098736564,0.0015840319,0.0001833247,0.000005683798,0.00001403455,0.0000047783296,0.02120195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881566,0.0002881099,0.00018262878,0.000089734,0.0004583823,0.00016551395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988722,0.000422756,0.0002604284,0.000134169,0.00028356473,0.000026879328],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008018506,0.000051740684,0.00009848808,0.00006804813,0.0009552486,0.000015213286,0.00020039093,0.000030454981,0.0032264227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022113656,0.000045347137,0.000023084196,0.0009394833,0.00023482839,0.0001743959,0.00008582133,0.00038318458,8.41593e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004395731,0.000035087727,0.00025203827,0.000006375874,0.00003595412,0.0000053701024,0.11139722,0.000027091757,0.00025120992,0.7488198,0.13652648,0.0025994033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005523536,0.00001214625,0.0011293093,8.329499e-7,0.000006658816,0.0000056855547,0.3800458,7.0016387e-7,0.00010498857,0.00015276337,0.61845225,0.00003362227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5631932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67605406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74866706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031160758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0122914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297147906","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2022.0014","title":"Exploring the Impact of GRE-Accepting Admissions on Law School Diversity and Selectivity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Racial diversity; Standardized test; Test (biology); Racial bias; Race (biology); Law; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics education; Ethnic group; Racism; History; Gender studies","score_opus":0.1192802836214255,"score_gpt":0.4393192091846614,"score_spread":0.3200389255632359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297147906","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10950365,0.59733367,0.0000017939221,0.21597816,0.005678136,0.0038458756,0.000055434844,0.000059976766,0.0675433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85556287,0.12842163,0.0001158629,0.008974388,0.00044101223,0.0005928177,0.000042512285,0.000019006733,0.005829871],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630773,0.0016166191,0.0008055206,0.00029448138,0.0007473416,0.00022832864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99595815,0.0007788938,0.0014012549,0.0007056695,0.00096997386,0.00018605618],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028954826,0.00020532332,0.0004669058,0.0001298672,0.002410862,0.000035128465,0.00068877585,0.00003335152,0.009472234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089987594,0.00014041159,0.00026771906,0.0020963612,0.0003025572,0.0007979032,0.0002706164,0.00054010755,0.000014505151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031539472,0.0048368988,0.017376462,0.019434763,0.00030434268,1.08623226e-7,0.013078835,0.000010986129,0.00010565396,0.43835962,0.46153265,0.04492813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069476526,0.000086990956,0.1385045,0.007295476,0.00025527755,0.0000028749132,0.0013905186,2.2388599e-7,0.00001538143,0.0013403606,0.85086256,0.00017636066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009180862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033692333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74605924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004593382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049701724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99888784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297470743","doi":"10.1017/9781009063814.012","title":"Narratives of Court Crises","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Political science; History; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.0676948639303214,"score_gpt":0.3041610098393977,"score_spread":0.2364661459090763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297470743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004792279,0.00006873893,0.000029046829,0.0020079738,0.0004900815,0.00023861355,0.0002022407,0.000055419943,0.99685997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032367976,0.00013022416,0.000095238094,0.00012157121,0.00012580129,8.704251e-7,0.000037331596,0.000014410506,0.99623775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990115,0.000121631216,0.00015211909,0.0002093388,0.0003680277,0.00013739047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988477,0.00014789532,0.00035178557,0.00023460036,0.0003336313,0.00008438339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002357198,0.00012973647,0.000196458,0.00017151092,0.00070189935,0.000040230203,0.0003902707,0.00014440838,0.00051417545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006943999,0.00016958211,0.00010792074,0.000023032502,0.0004921471,0.00026524434,0.00012319257,0.000517689,0.000008336745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002015917,0.000012820792,0.0000018099732,0.000013704708,0.000053453336,0.000009779116,0.0051615518,4.8810375e-7,0.000006962651,0.84851086,0.14600788,0.00020053313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010975437,0.000021315018,0.0000063851753,0.000019770927,0.000058366986,7.8307386e-7,0.006937386,3.681827e-7,0.000016736887,0.00008540855,0.9925786,0.00016510363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025803836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004802102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84842545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002107609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011324481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6915358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299908467","doi":"10.1353/book.20786","title":"Sexual Assault in Canada : Law, Legal Practice and Women's Activism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Sexual violence; Political science; State (computer science); Face (sociological concept); Law; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Gender studies; Poison control; Medicine; Social science; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.02623211642405565,"score_gpt":0.27233821968696936,"score_spread":0.2461061032629137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299908467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010268394,0.000054542325,0.000005874715,0.0017378643,0.00030991618,0.00021478793,0.000044924996,0.000016537278,0.9965887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12270311,0.000022076896,0.00017998066,0.00044208264,0.00013268083,8.613745e-7,0.000012763544,0.000011575796,0.8764949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986199,0.00026545025,0.00015130144,0.00020134512,0.00047828138,0.0002837179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983895,0.0006086848,0.00038968137,0.00017309985,0.000275401,0.00016363547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065498386,0.00012984152,0.00021533029,0.00009258891,0.00031460033,0.000055788936,0.00026191227,0.00022610699,0.00017826851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021682034,0.00017272132,0.000017317303,0.000032706197,0.00031113919,0.00083518465,0.00007718457,0.0007621342,0.0000028717375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034558787,0.0000497997,0.000065103784,0.000049027745,0.0000785504,0.000031054653,0.039122097,0.0000014647673,0.0000033333731,0.8912438,0.065537035,0.0037841622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002064974,0.0000130101225,0.000095275645,0.00001909194,0.000043786727,0.000002155122,0.021441594,0.0000011151466,0.0000030719837,0.00014210468,0.9778628,0.00016951835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99174196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91232574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015513196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011819487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300027340","doi":"10.24310/rejie.2010.v0i1.7947","title":"The preparation of legal reports: their rediscovery in the light of the acquisition and development of competences","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Jurídica de Investigación e Innovación Educativa (REJIE Nueva Época)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Social skills; Knowledge management; Team development; Dreyfus model of skill acquisition; Plan (archaeology); Process management; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.022594986493836934,"score_gpt":0.34275327393889543,"score_spread":0.3201582874450585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300027340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9185149,0.00042277662,0.00003264609,0.06620446,0.00083064975,0.00071022287,0.000010311102,0.000013913695,0.013260126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973608,0.000076113356,0.001506824,0.00051396515,0.00019833147,0.00008841618,0.0000113603755,0.000011543846,0.00023260301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966319,0.00085593597,0.0012625008,0.00027466187,0.00068144576,0.00029356137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958896,0.0010734729,0.0016201661,0.0007293725,0.0006116258,0.0000757308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005529634,0.00018163661,0.00029044537,0.00016265965,0.0007920472,0.0002150601,0.00071702077,0.00014258987,0.00005719544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044971043,0.00010458953,0.00007086267,0.0018821026,0.0017676363,0.00065596605,0.000083199004,0.0006907203,0.0000013925453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058248148,0.0005667167,0.043337356,0.00020129303,0.0000764409,0.0000012938581,0.13331766,0.0000036172573,0.040209316,0.7644311,0.010808985,0.006987981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017047496,0.00006034999,0.078337066,0.00032079578,0.000037946073,0.00004298074,0.040271208,0.000010183767,0.021559704,0.010809911,0.8481457,0.00023367911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073934987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001054635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8373367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009003042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068584685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301006991","doi":"10.46692/9781447332978.015","title":"The impact of training and coaching on the development of practice skills in youth justice: findings from Australia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coaching; Economic Justice; Psychology; Training (meteorology); Positive Youth Development; Applied psychology; Medical education; Political science; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Geography; Psychotherapist; Law","score_opus":0.14615536436532306,"score_gpt":0.4716895235450135,"score_spread":0.3255341591796904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301006991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018511998,0.000033263972,0.000024282423,0.0038706656,0.00030584366,0.0002629753,0.00003674903,0.000010342281,0.97694385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7274912,0.000095698095,0.0016098989,0.000099859535,0.00013488815,0.000007036714,0.000012819444,0.000028875385,0.2705197],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990168,0.0002387537,0.00022886325,0.000116695745,0.00025959164,0.00013926225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651414,0.0025554562,0.0006417596,0.0001887806,0.000068152534,0.000031718067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021784855,0.00009602289,0.00014207537,0.00008313155,0.00050795363,0.00016478759,0.0002849244,0.00012127317,0.0007514496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065661585,0.000052436044,0.000028457831,0.0001354457,0.0002163193,0.00018878661,0.000022877342,0.00037468216,0.000008219241],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024866178,0.00019677769,0.001230199,0.000013557111,0.00025866853,4.6835436e-7,0.8276192,0.0000027209844,0.000023115546,0.06779979,0.09192558,0.010905077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018405548,0.000023088383,0.010855615,0.00035520975,0.00009470741,1.9856633e-7,0.22668055,0.0000021630442,0.000023303675,0.0002905364,0.7613246,0.00016599064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076552734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02056425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7089792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006757524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011653907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301512444","doi":"10.3138/9781442687769","title":"Court Government and the Collapse of Accountability in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; Government (linguistics); Accountability; Political science; Public administration; Law; Economic history; History; Philosophy; Geology","score_opus":0.031261204771347625,"score_gpt":0.2595726909206606,"score_spread":0.22831148614931296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301512444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007495716,0.00031057736,0.0000021236824,0.0015858439,0.00011892909,0.00051995955,0.00008911349,0.0000032168584,0.98987454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26564065,0.0015289692,0.0000464099,0.00029612382,0.00005040022,0.0000015532225,0.000007641821,0.0000068418035,0.7324214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989802,0.0002991246,0.00013799466,0.00010807468,0.00039197906,0.00008257971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983431,0.0009889107,0.00030740473,0.00017126612,0.00015609719,0.000033234166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061576354,0.000073516334,0.00019868724,0.0000079626725,0.00029164483,0.000017253311,0.00024609853,0.0000730723,0.0000573064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014958327,0.000056583183,0.00002549628,0.000006843346,0.0014862434,0.000106043626,0.00009054644,0.00017950959,4.4461565e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010257235,0.000026727808,0.0005292631,0.00005561828,0.000122877,0.0000025821662,0.16188125,0.0000046936334,5.5640135e-7,0.79667324,0.038910568,0.0007668976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001176754,0.0000044307576,0.0008114568,0.000027071455,0.000053537748,3.9144112e-7,0.011157182,0.000019921665,0.0000010123302,0.00019776012,0.9864904,0.00006003006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99951684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94757986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016107678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034319167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60880727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301735661","doi":"10.47925/74.588","title":"Rights Talk, Redux","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Redux; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0625604236937493,"score_gpt":0.40839629477815714,"score_spread":0.34583587108440783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301735661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071184285,0.000042730688,0.000036408564,0.07766612,0.0024759006,0.00013524551,0.000001991365,0.000032171396,0.84842515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99102545,0.0000065972463,0.0012537113,0.00075244793,0.0029538358,0.000015764785,0.00001118787,0.0000040285495,0.0039769537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993358,0.00008399956,0.0001680433,0.000111878435,0.0001975022,0.00010273752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989006,0.000082145874,0.00015706386,0.00016435632,0.000630542,0.000065301756],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032529794,0.0000475927,0.000058645244,0.0001231406,0.00043692515,0.000040930718,0.00014471523,0.000048762333,0.001647469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044647462,0.000049077924,0.000026099908,0.00054633216,0.00032383186,0.00056415366,0.000006965968,0.00008854062,0.0002305135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051247157,0.0002197783,0.00022249667,0.0000042236607,0.000005640327,2.087474e-8,0.011384324,4.324329e-8,0.00019929555,0.9603548,0.024023365,0.003580912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036309237,0.000024273251,0.0012072421,0.0000130067465,0.000007428984,4.331959e-7,0.0010352503,8.4427535e-7,0.0007216352,0.33764786,0.6592496,0.000056147634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005494743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054043584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9198412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006158646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012581402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302779838","doi":"","title":"A Procedure for Managing Conflict of Interest When Forming Thesis Juries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of interest; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.6183681944181981,"score_gpt":0.6496515445824889,"score_spread":0.031283350164290735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302779838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7182251,0.0040398324,0.0010376811,0.047970645,0.0020553728,0.0019302933,0.00007956403,0.00006257593,0.2245989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99439424,0.0016040773,0.00074442424,0.0004401158,0.00026678454,0.00007093564,0.0000036145293,0.000020606114,0.002455207],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985055,0.00012514356,0.00056535524,0.00021189525,0.00033009096,0.00026203875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638927,0.0006670896,0.0016749019,0.00039349153,0.0007518519,0.00012341508],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023774812,0.00013779307,0.0003665716,0.00037973272,0.0016239417,0.0032422303,0.0026783536,0.00008100964,0.0031680912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050219274,0.00012673046,0.00012444414,0.00027936106,0.00034707983,0.006955065,0.00033330155,0.0002606682,0.000004674319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004619316,0.0006102163,0.41656876,0.0006077696,0.0006158902,0.000005663433,0.061311435,0.0000101099295,0.0151637,0.1630025,0.21531416,0.12632786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048734265,0.000012603959,0.17284985,0.0007182833,0.00014494426,0.0000027100461,0.009483301,0.000031413292,0.011902186,0.09709568,0.7068722,0.00039948183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071788426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002409507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49155805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006667143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068606035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303469978","doi":"","title":"The ethics of argumentation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.1558865965595398,"score_gpt":0.5145061695336608,"score_spread":0.358619572974121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303469978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010763621,0.000059071317,0.00045818544,0.24725752,0.0007531006,0.000056266137,2.288933e-7,0.000013081913,0.7406389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987928,0.0000728746,0.0004741275,0.00087247696,0.00011667444,0.0000028665834,5.542376e-7,7.1715965e-7,0.010531706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999624,0.00012194445,0.000057794106,0.0000130044,0.00012405234,0.0000591788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990972,0.0007032172,0.000041333293,0.00003735222,0.00010288742,0.00001800469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016651349,0.0000096374,0.000010932654,0.000008285349,0.0004302459,0.00002905415,0.000042353917,0.00002113285,0.00043822313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013807382,0.0000063524744,0.000006574351,0.00015505473,0.0000741798,0.00034819686,0.0000029166483,0.000099063735,0.00004930291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2123452e-7,0.000012720344,0.0023843888,3.3682176e-7,0.0000013753416,6.43189e-10,0.034030937,5.8007224e-8,0.000030191271,0.95468205,0.0056941416,0.0031633684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011274237,0.0000012584298,0.0038851912,3.7338904e-7,0.0000015940182,2.547189e-8,0.027028417,5.2533466e-7,0.00024258907,0.0021787728,0.9666397,0.000010279504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019319883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007004281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012475381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019231199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4798236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307375661","doi":"10.26443/glsars.v2i1.249","title":"Those Who Teach Must Also Do: Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Legal Education and the Canadian Armed Forces","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill GLSA Research Series","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Context (archaeology); Engineering ethics; Legal education; Sociology; Adaptation (eye); Political science; Diversity (politics); Process (computing); Public relations; Engineering; Law; Social science; Computer science; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.11302607820655491,"score_gpt":0.4595577385391481,"score_spread":0.3465316603325932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307375661","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28048512,0.00039312767,2.2751364e-7,0.37782103,0.00031200977,0.0006368169,0.000048509835,0.000017553231,0.3402856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896198,0.00033842548,0.000030807143,0.001580008,0.000075621734,0.00010138973,0.000012273921,0.0000045694374,0.008237096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968609,0.0014366216,0.00012725349,0.00019720416,0.001028676,0.0003492994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988613,0.00051537005,0.00004717138,0.00013912976,0.00026987668,0.000167128],"candidate_categories":["sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009784122,0.00006170627,0.00009027009,0.0003366307,0.031026999,0.0005257033,0.00046983574,0.000046806323,0.00033213157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021119218,0.00005278514,0.000013513624,0.001089029,0.00091958576,0.0010954661,0.013114332,0.00076186616,0.0000024021242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009824959,0.00007806712,0.0032381897,0.000013912282,0.0000067495184,0.0000029997516,0.13435516,0.0000023380467,0.000015208718,0.8094781,0.010882781,0.041828264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022679188,0.000032490505,0.004611193,0.00000896641,0.0000030253848,0.0000027341664,0.0996564,0.0000114365075,0.0000071033,0.05974474,0.83562654,0.00006855473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8687084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92173564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82474375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006626337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022666818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308150498","doi":"10.1017/cls.2022.22","title":"Dalia Gesualdi-Fecteau et Emmanuelle Bernheim, dir. La recherche empirique en droit : méthodes et pratiques. Montréal : Éditions Thémis, 2022, 336 pp.","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08353053914327485,"score_gpt":0.3760000190667353,"score_spread":0.29246947992346045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308150498","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13833433,0.02583888,0.00067384326,0.6916017,0.0053839446,0.0007845324,0.0022233587,0.000050474533,0.13510895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7743059,0.021969883,0.007271589,0.065756746,0.001879759,0.00016499564,0.00035883486,0.00017160799,0.12812069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901477,0.007013327,0.00095421326,0.00047749194,0.00035434405,0.0010529193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916551,0.0044172145,0.00092811964,0.000363916,0.0007602057,0.0018754228],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016499188,0.00039252185,0.0006327359,0.00013977825,0.0029873685,0.00064866635,0.0006572321,0.0006938112,0.0029463826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028198466,0.00050791266,0.0005327234,0.0011171942,0.000992485,0.001755014,0.00008514176,0.0055024144,0.00000891729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063906464,0.000093844785,0.00010199468,0.00005538757,0.0002447269,0.00011500685,0.18782783,0.000103622515,0.00002033824,0.65234065,0.15734692,0.001743287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005338691,0.0001582103,0.0006665725,0.00012639182,0.00020674928,0.0005253379,0.11911068,0.000107426844,0.000004772796,0.065906316,0.81219524,0.00045843268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6031132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.918353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65484834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052624037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019527143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312390596","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17185-7_1","title":"Coming to Care Ethics in Higher Education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Narrative; Scope (computer science); Subject (documents); Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Sociology; Library science; Engineering; Literature; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.22170390628559497,"score_gpt":0.46212841053998605,"score_spread":0.24042450425439107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312390596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008488494,0.0001100096,0.0000015751472,0.1916362,0.002744725,0.00024336373,0.000005465369,0.00003309697,0.8052171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009846407,0.000063993095,0.00044254924,0.017080603,0.00058221543,0.000052155967,0.00007083671,0.000017049128,0.9718442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990278,0.000085845386,0.00019457738,0.00018580108,0.00038809096,0.00011787778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990397,0.00034468953,0.00009908009,0.00016119213,0.00028367498,0.00007165473],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005467912,0.000088874054,0.00009731231,0.00026035728,0.0005321777,0.00011984535,0.00019185453,0.00023812796,0.086818635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030905727,0.00010433845,0.000031184012,0.00018280926,0.000041444284,0.00024321972,0.000045073604,0.0013452066,0.000347949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014661578,0.000012170048,0.0000226669,0.0000075780767,0.0000026957566,2.900667e-7,0.047167633,0.0000015316101,3.7080036e-7,0.91166455,0.036882773,0.0042362814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022675487,0.0000065967574,0.00008049789,0.000022400103,0.0000064646856,1.0708157e-7,0.014593472,3.2790176e-8,2.727215e-7,0.009646739,0.97548836,0.00013240115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0154496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01915704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93860555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007142792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054114843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313366648","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-16922-9_3","title":"Using Codes of Professional Ethics and Conduct in Teacher Education: Pitfalls and Best Practice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Professional ethics; Ethical code; Engineering ethics; Morality; Professional conduct; Professional development; Pedagogy; Globe; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.2853760045911453,"score_gpt":0.522541369374616,"score_spread":0.23716536478347072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313366648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024402833,0.00948432,0.000004478027,0.44377318,0.002542417,0.000838022,0.000101004545,0.000010652684,0.5188431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6302565,0.013911326,0.0041717268,0.010007975,0.0010168846,0.00013587977,0.0002546362,0.000058731282,0.3401864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968421,0.0013075303,0.0006029205,0.0004021283,0.0006706086,0.00017474304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883709,0.009565144,0.00054747856,0.00015952904,0.0012375788,0.00011939313],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007821552,0.00021153838,0.00031887172,0.00037908086,0.0008759457,0.00015115067,0.00016495294,0.0008433608,0.0015297412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019243747,0.00022917255,0.00003095058,0.00018802207,0.0010158209,0.000888566,0.00010835807,0.010519038,0.0000030663325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025826788,0.00056526985,0.0011311397,0.00011134425,0.000019017705,5.0831795e-7,0.08427365,4.612611e-7,0.00001171927,0.91074693,0.0010919156,0.002022193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020292038,0.000052269974,0.0021753632,0.00067491445,0.000044028962,0.000019058138,0.056548618,0.0000066166735,0.0000013029044,0.13156363,0.8084225,0.00028875686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02027063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012824323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8073306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003114474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0201384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313529024","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2022.70","title":"The Rise of Women Lawyers in India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.08264378286202186,"score_gpt":0.4298698225698078,"score_spread":0.347226039707786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313529024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7517524,0.000036600075,8.767012e-7,0.034931213,0.0014361253,0.00015331895,0.0000035646194,0.00007089244,0.21161503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966035,0.00007495744,0.000008551541,0.0006469022,0.0004997395,0.000045601995,0.000002545952,0.0000053763574,0.0021128415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989661,0.00025980658,0.00017780547,0.00007763307,0.00022771944,0.0002909255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992483,0.0004563916,0.000098084594,0.0000759625,0.000079876045,0.000041383206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019681551,0.00004030716,0.00007638748,0.000032319902,0.0008557189,0.00008625281,0.00019012004,0.00007397957,0.00013416153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005553294,0.00003555467,0.000027839882,0.0013924164,0.0007874136,0.00028799978,0.000027017359,0.00019200638,0.00011709322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051718284,0.00001983493,0.0010235949,0.0000018848642,0.0000055083347,5.1824816e-7,0.2437028,4.819675e-7,0.000016223183,0.7442535,0.009183878,0.001786611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008386908,0.0000052241935,0.020639813,0.0000021204128,0.0000017624617,2.4621245e-8,0.15196924,0.0000011312659,0.000011266606,0.018257258,0.80898315,0.000045170575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057576234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038050588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79979926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019177371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043743197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8703842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317038159","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7780","title":"People With Disabilities Need Lawyers Too! A Ready-To-Use Plan for Law Schools to Educate Law Students to Effectively Serve the Legal Needs of Clients With Disabilities as Well as Clients Without Disabilities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Legal education; Inclusion (mineral); Curriculum; Diversity (politics); Law; Legal profession; Action plan; Legal research; Plan (archaeology); Education Act; Political science; Special education; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.05319086489561085,"score_gpt":0.3855859909408429,"score_spread":0.332395126045232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317038159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9410007,0.0000049087307,0.000052905096,0.017664734,0.00070190924,0.004795851,0.00035574337,0.00006998832,0.035353266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754262,0.0000012510096,0.00057915936,0.0069264104,0.00023408385,0.0021653248,0.000034462315,0.00006477761,0.014568331],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959314,0.0005749887,0.00065428205,0.0005617859,0.001591261,0.0006863132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939898,0.0035922574,0.0003111898,0.00077425817,0.00085228815,0.00048020916],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001509913,0.00036177653,0.0005535954,0.0002667961,0.0013802918,0.0010383558,0.0016594032,0.00007455402,0.0004679855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004388434,0.00028689156,0.00010122322,0.0018526876,0.0006379142,0.002053998,0.00056038256,0.00044255346,0.00013341843],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006452978,0.0017709237,0.2712394,0.00043577957,0.00026597755,6.4784854e-7,0.42406398,0.0036330028,0.00011387437,0.28191873,0.010019881,0.00008483324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000969264,0.00249068,0.02708364,0.0001888832,0.00038110718,0.000003435387,0.79080623,0.00000305022,0.00045475108,0.00059904496,0.17647073,0.0005492022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121021785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031363685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36674225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004902953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009325202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317884482","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.29","title":"Theorizing Access to Civil Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European University Institute","keywords":"Economic Justice; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Underpinning; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; State (computer science); Law; Frame (networking); Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.1130655748367023,"score_gpt":0.44688745876339186,"score_spread":0.33382188392668954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317884482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08511806,0.00019897279,0.00060462434,0.34501743,0.007406373,0.00024126722,0.000017989818,0.000054145832,0.5613411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890905,0.000045302364,0.00024334791,0.007709204,0.000841866,0.000003242924,7.7034855e-7,0.000008530346,0.002057257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988166,0.0001441066,0.0002679374,0.00009719409,0.00031984903,0.00035428518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979085,0.00039433627,0.00017286361,0.00012857113,0.0005831463,0.0008126135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017782322,0.00006371345,0.0001013798,0.00031125548,0.0009940959,0.0007631297,0.000733344,0.00005403471,0.0008282847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026350566,0.000064915635,0.000043116182,0.0016252494,0.00016100223,0.0015753387,0.00001723093,0.00033758653,0.00034187912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004674277,0.0000070994147,0.0013005151,0.000009137466,0.000012641273,0.00008886424,0.026843837,0.0000956855,0.00005324405,0.8298209,0.1394576,0.0023058543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004849235,0.000017938382,0.002905949,0.000053559997,0.00002322608,0.000010004234,0.0041298238,0.000002328569,0.000044252352,0.006129304,0.98654693,0.000088184395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07154269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47905186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9039724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020703913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005880302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318714330","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4322778","title":"Ethical Issues for Judges Attending and Presenting at Conferences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.07415968418500964,"score_gpt":0.4437997087657303,"score_spread":0.3696400245807207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318714330","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43493652,0.00074443815,0.00038709442,0.54505825,0.0006397213,0.00021363035,0.0000025238483,0.000104083905,0.017913716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733352,0.003436028,0.00009207915,0.00036245811,0.00069838215,0.000011076757,0.000005243027,0.0000067917645,0.022052754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983885,0.00015966469,0.00014825808,0.00010959023,0.00021413628,0.0009798391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905497,0.0005827872,0.00010640166,0.00004223924,0.00015406877,0.000059545095],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00454141,0.000052987514,0.00007572507,0.00009914993,0.0015927147,0.0002785257,0.00012247563,0.00009793518,0.00011079849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020063363,0.000048183607,0.00003190181,0.00031611737,0.00011315012,0.00032020902,0.000027014261,0.0014023642,0.000032800825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063985813,0.0000068181434,0.00995848,0.0000034491773,0.000028482567,2.7311464e-7,0.0062932577,8.856519e-7,0.00007224846,0.9732326,0.00614238,0.004254676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015568109,0.000035449102,0.0018759925,0.0000072495454,0.000016363982,0.000017036376,0.050074097,0.000055977234,0.000026605905,0.36441007,0.58323634,0.00008910384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062571187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007595505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6088226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002416679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002764254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318714501","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4322758","title":"Judicial Confidentiality in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Confidentiality; Duty; Law; Privilege (computing); Obligation; Judicial opinion; Public interest","score_opus":0.02297881705149732,"score_gpt":0.3463328719774011,"score_spread":0.32335405492590374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318714501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8217071,0.0001441326,0.00011998719,0.13057421,0.0022168513,0.00011641801,0.0000028991055,0.000033131073,0.04508523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946924,0.0008033759,0.0000030807844,0.0004862624,0.00043185306,0.0000028316895,0.0000031826755,0.0000039388965,0.0035730603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980875,0.0001970279,0.00018196258,0.000071389346,0.00032238595,0.0011396831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995987,0.00011407638,0.000085987995,0.000050946666,0.000094453346,0.00005584758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032540683,0.000039343457,0.00006149791,0.00010510116,0.0004143568,0.00008573488,0.00016339209,0.000027757244,0.00028240914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005593033,0.000042037504,0.000019458517,0.0009735184,0.000032774602,0.0003177408,0.000008757768,0.0014906973,0.00007057633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008796942,0.000017796448,0.020110592,7.989279e-7,0.000020301815,0.0000046382406,0.003400831,0.000019213725,0.00001563116,0.9557952,0.010227531,0.010378667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032779085,0.000016502703,0.02671391,0.000006378194,0.000009033938,0.000016486118,0.17546265,0.000021282263,0.000008234657,0.37022352,0.42704576,0.0001484386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58557165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033079651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10249845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90258956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318716465","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4328616","title":"Omniscient Narrative Modes in Law: From Trial Strategy to the Fellow-Servant Rule","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Narrative; Servant; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05117670826859536,"score_gpt":0.3921561226601826,"score_spread":0.34097941439158724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318716465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85086095,0.0001327134,0.00024789805,0.12868512,0.0009536814,0.00036510645,0.0000055392115,0.000038515325,0.018710485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99180496,0.00030068384,0.000028171762,0.0008542166,0.0008787727,0.000029600373,0.0000063298603,0.000007583842,0.0060897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754226,0.0004357418,0.0002843462,0.00015597529,0.00042760628,0.0011540771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992855,0.00025790505,0.00012577315,0.00011932113,0.00012615618,0.00008532929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004958774,0.00007924364,0.00009944163,0.00012104675,0.0011886999,0.00040314594,0.00038872872,0.000054164793,0.00019105626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052696606,0.00005788457,0.00005061468,0.0012801484,0.00010463155,0.00055672677,0.00002606705,0.001612952,0.00023912694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037199273,0.00007816947,0.000072100185,2.5160486e-7,0.000027676473,0.0000014439033,0.05570863,0.0009200467,0.000108314,0.9362361,0.0026746118,0.0038006613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024157185,0.00020613662,0.00026824922,0.000008402894,0.000009836151,0.000002796693,0.3781915,0.00013435198,0.00002227641,0.47540224,0.14320676,0.00013172402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023430632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23449835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46083385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071299967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076948763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318977566","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4345983","title":"Rankings without U.S. News: A Revealed Preference Approach to Evaluating Law Schools","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Law; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10842790241691798,"score_gpt":0.4150757585761705,"score_spread":0.30664785615925255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318977566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43160617,0.00031471625,0.008429752,0.120495364,0.0010476391,0.0011576106,0.000002825038,0.0004381331,0.43650776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980562,0.00046930372,0.0017168925,0.0016093815,0.00070099323,0.000052689556,0.0000060040934,0.000017976303,0.01486476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657816,0.00048493783,0.00031984897,0.00022891836,0.0006909622,0.0016971955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998915,0.00014355642,0.00021176541,0.00016328803,0.00039910662,0.00016725033],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009014801,0.00010888809,0.00014168331,0.0001949877,0.0014237809,0.00063534203,0.0004252477,0.000078712255,0.00007542665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024133166,0.0001032927,0.000058959038,0.0018308709,0.000056397683,0.0011226762,0.000034859302,0.002859178,0.0004542263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019546382,0.000045584973,0.0015785722,0.0000035679338,0.00004035129,3.1051545e-7,0.0083629945,0.000050309474,0.00016904807,0.9770861,0.0023258163,0.010317785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009188529,0.0002082668,0.002109788,0.00007655676,0.00007209289,0.000059390604,0.12883525,0.00021023396,0.000016776004,0.6760167,0.19101262,0.0004634936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050354847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007894913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5489558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086842856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011028459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319877134","doi":"10.29242/lawstats.2021","title":"ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 2021","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ARL academic law and medical library statistics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Library science; Academic library; Law; Political science; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03355264656939061,"score_gpt":0.3517682123872268,"score_spread":0.31821556581783617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319877134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000056218983,0.00182192,0.001574312,0.069747165,0.0035981156,0.00059845624,0.010138597,0.0005316747,0.91198415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00012432205,0.05042327,0.0073168245,0.052482653,0.005930748,0.00005438239,0.0074959425,0.00019980644,0.87597203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943552,0.0005632082,0.0013674003,0.000807961,0.0019705778,0.0009356623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990354,0.0069482806,0.0006906253,0.0003775241,0.00011195696,0.00151762],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010196894,0.0005471009,0.0007213597,0.00020497813,0.0010769735,0.00045049246,0.0011681872,0.0027863847,0.015525453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026437854,0.00054552226,0.00008019227,0.00059090456,0.002859663,0.0031843204,0.0005211799,0.008287007,0.0013511643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010894011,0.000016048994,0.000037897644,0.00008859831,0.000046125282,0.000065092514,0.0011139148,9.418202e-8,1.88598e-7,0.5075975,0.48347867,0.0075450046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020703643,0.000032491833,0.000021184578,0.0002913095,0.00009835849,0.000007798056,0.00030672146,0.000038516686,0.0000015180669,0.37585357,0.6227437,0.00039775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005863455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023808592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13926508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009562015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010205354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320019173","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2022.05.83","title":"Access to legal education in the countries with the common system of law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal education; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.07788190432214644,"score_gpt":0.4393589149882009,"score_spread":0.3614770106660545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320019173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6712948,0.0000968594,0.000096727446,0.13544123,0.00009548083,0.00041776078,0.0000065485456,0.0000095889745,0.19254097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947478,0.000003856755,0.000016583206,0.0045409426,0.000040896022,0.000089512076,0.0000016186876,0.0000011480454,0.0005576423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985948,0.00069800887,0.00013614289,0.00010325397,0.0003681149,0.00009968018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880475,0.0008355576,0.0000774063,0.00011798106,0.00013240753,0.000031922827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010787848,0.000049224436,0.00010198122,0.00004116137,0.0010945919,0.00018789977,0.0003891515,0.000010645905,0.00006602018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036201698,0.000027911889,0.000012172716,0.00073704665,0.00034031773,0.00039206858,0.00005266515,0.0003108651,0.000004823592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003110402,0.00007844758,0.0047116824,0.000004630253,0.0000057788834,4.807149e-7,0.027254988,0.000049835213,9.902489e-7,0.9618993,0.005880249,0.0000825407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007413115,0.00009265663,0.03063922,0.000017699607,0.00002313346,0.000004901185,0.19014414,0.00015434361,0.000016820042,0.00062346336,0.77813256,0.00007692562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013496611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011447118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9612758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054052187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006318345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320401297","doi":"10.47925/2008.190","title":"No Remedy for Cultural Conflict: The Inability of Discourse Ethics to Resolve Substantive Moral Disagreement","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2970231759252047,"score_gpt":0.49549280400935325,"score_spread":0.19846962808414853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320401297","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.452933,0.000113691276,0.0003102424,0.4549221,0.0019262234,0.0017104065,0.00005444121,0.000019221277,0.08801065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954669,0.000043468553,0.0016552447,0.001029076,0.0005273629,0.00012596285,0.00003147589,0.0000049749415,0.0011155725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883425,0.00019836491,0.00031748283,0.00015015238,0.00037061019,0.00012912674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675447,0.0006422478,0.00029135396,0.0002368661,0.0020098826,0.00006521067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011017699,0.0000735545,0.00011641959,0.000058060916,0.0005681382,0.00002137176,0.00022717926,0.00006395697,0.00007624892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048118634,0.000056533445,0.00006527375,0.00048141714,0.0006388379,0.000412754,0.00001584153,0.00021212045,0.000010213018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007599245,0.0005618904,0.0045705433,0.000035241537,0.000018599525,1.7251496e-8,0.23749723,0.000004053798,0.00028820997,0.7461132,0.010336438,0.00049862475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005462023,0.0004274268,0.08262325,0.00013943267,0.000117282936,0.0000012884066,0.16024005,0.000016679513,0.002448977,0.12154619,0.63147616,0.0004170526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035074854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004538507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.624567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011629049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019639307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57605976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320514242","doi":"10.17118/11143/19147","title":"Reconsidering “community”: a normative model to address communities in the law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1048449195094748,"score_gpt":0.3137400614515826,"score_spread":0.20889514194210781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320514242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31339604,0.00004239444,0.0005283371,0.022965502,0.00005072622,0.00012479114,0.000008810591,0.000031940417,0.66285145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98205215,0.00008170242,0.0016991022,0.006944034,0.000041152634,0.000009591972,0.000014767674,0.0000070616966,0.0091504175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985803,0.0008883883,0.000122026846,0.00006362545,0.00011310477,0.00023256519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864584,0.0007787248,0.00004947483,0.0003058279,0.000145145,0.00007497583],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011693668,0.00006251183,0.00009170053,0.00008456933,0.001345986,0.00014515781,0.00040877712,0.000068307854,0.00024636567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029001845,0.00007474079,0.00003801527,0.0005699701,0.00010304971,0.00044199039,0.00010499253,0.00065975933,0.000029261055],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007909866,0.000056089048,0.00033996982,0.000015367752,0.000008705704,0.000014991003,0.4837612,0.002043973,0.000076328295,0.5123664,0.000997788,0.00031127877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017426333,0.000011580077,0.000463671,0.000101490026,0.00001661488,0.000028512624,0.5787103,0.00096203125,0.00024292311,0.011981009,0.4071699,0.00013763625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017605565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31565633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6686561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009848633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004949433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321152057","doi":"","title":"The junior referee conundrum: how do you gain experience with the peer review process?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Peer review; Psychology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.4766950567825052,"score_gpt":0.6144748890156891,"score_spread":0.13777983223318396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321152057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10936562,0.051559392,0.00017469049,0.3640472,0.0016488342,0.002602881,0.0000253438,0.00009467091,0.47048137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93007904,0.042685904,0.000108068816,0.0046806033,0.00026551384,0.0002860962,0.0000042715496,0.00002983295,0.02186064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964679,0.0008281776,0.0004444846,0.00030224724,0.0015713822,0.00038580186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994767,0.00071539194,0.0011310369,0.000610011,0.0025853016,0.00019123493],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066643143,0.00020135638,0.00033217057,0.00014002687,0.0021588234,0.0034313577,0.003967055,0.0000711743,0.011784509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048668426,0.000109705674,0.00008240837,0.0020737676,0.000790653,0.0048240297,0.00022336058,0.00069740065,0.000029948304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012822614,0.00024422072,0.053448882,0.00011465878,0.00013662549,0.000008073346,0.04557753,0.0000014280386,0.00023446619,0.01861794,0.8588475,0.022640452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012494622,0.0000069646926,0.037332132,0.00044652936,0.00006444311,0.0000064651153,0.019808777,9.300488e-7,0.00038499653,0.002648576,0.9389467,0.00022849592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003003684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015529442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82071346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000794428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011119525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322749763","doi":"10.1007/978-981-19-8696-3_4","title":"The Tree of Legal Knowledge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Tree (set theory); Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.10035326254636422,"score_gpt":0.4054556124806165,"score_spread":0.3051023499342523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322749763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[9.64693e-7,0.00009149347,0.0000058837795,0.03672129,0.0014212132,0.00010649491,0.0000047112353,0.00005776555,0.9615902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014541681,0.0003840025,0.000028473374,0.00013324585,0.00047921552,0.000005345178,0.0000059742542,0.000012969733,0.9974966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936026,0.000032307464,0.00020099469,0.00009063521,0.00021352223,0.0001023024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841636,0.00091132865,0.00015411676,0.00017021125,0.00031310206,0.000034866753],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071075675,0.000065711574,0.0000854746,0.00006492985,0.00048883783,0.000114101334,0.00024006117,0.00012394783,0.0017917695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005343974,0.000046283003,0.000065235625,0.00010898575,0.0002871174,0.0001456468,0.000026926811,0.0002921841,0.0014286235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.964732e-7,0.0000044937615,8.334504e-7,0.0000018654912,0.000014050542,1.4348437e-7,0.0015602807,1.7001247e-8,4.2155403e-7,0.7989971,0.18497846,0.014441351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019863764,0.000005458675,0.000014773779,0.000009562258,0.000011996238,1.03777296e-7,0.0011852098,5.264844e-7,0.0000019239028,0.04322914,0.95546573,0.00005568559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019244442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038657345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7704873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041822303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015029918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323038566","doi":"10.32920/22212052","title":"Telling Tales About Law School: Reflections on Care, Holism, and Marginality in Law Teaching","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Narrative; Conversation; Context (archaeology); Holism; Legal education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Holistic education; Psychology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20111856943885573,"score_gpt":0.4953384556689872,"score_spread":0.2942198862301315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323038566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030238884,0.00013868375,0.00020120898,0.034596454,0.0017014636,0.00040196237,0.000024297931,0.00030564234,0.9323914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846826,0.00027997332,0.0023144395,0.0029723214,0.00058876915,0.00008049172,0.000056915193,0.000021190946,0.009003263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981732,0.0004944076,0.00032652734,0.00042930007,0.00031876948,0.00025781666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987329,0.0005390316,0.00015515785,0.00028517924,0.00016554796,0.00012215748],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017004078,0.0001539756,0.00018164537,0.00020370366,0.0013465998,0.0008984523,0.00021842585,0.0002854126,0.00016783105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009947396,0.00016101154,0.00005080798,0.00036241306,0.00033839833,0.00045718768,0.00013832838,0.0022343309,0.000114620874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044065855,0.0000474874,0.0007083631,0.00003687014,0.0000107821725,0.0000014844007,0.02338645,0.00012539577,0.0000058868227,0.97432524,0.00088230753,0.00046534344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010790382,0.000012600389,0.00380508,0.00020462177,0.000021903905,6.3768493e-7,0.0478716,0.000017713108,0.000017669356,0.06190239,0.885726,0.00031188538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33632877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29880887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95444375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034097573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007276393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323038568","doi":"10.32920/22212052.v1","title":"Telling Tales About Law School: Reflections on Care, Holism, and Marginality in Law Teaching","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Narrative; Conversation; Context (archaeology); Holism; Legal education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Holistic education; Law; Epistemology; Political science; History; Art","score_opus":0.20111856943885573,"score_gpt":0.4953384556689872,"score_spread":0.2942198862301315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323038568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030238884,0.00013868375,0.00020120898,0.034596454,0.0017014636,0.00040196237,0.000024297931,0.00030564234,0.9323914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846826,0.00027997332,0.0023144395,0.0029723214,0.00058876915,0.00008049172,0.000056915193,0.000021190946,0.009003263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981732,0.0004944076,0.00032652734,0.00042930007,0.00031876948,0.00025781666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987329,0.0005390316,0.00015515785,0.00028517924,0.00016554796,0.00012215748],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017004078,0.0001539756,0.00018164537,0.00020370366,0.0013465998,0.0008984523,0.00021842585,0.0002854126,0.00016783105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009947396,0.00016101154,0.00005080798,0.00036241306,0.00033839833,0.00045718768,0.00013832838,0.0022343309,0.000114620874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044065855,0.0000474874,0.0007083631,0.00003687014,0.0000107821725,0.0000014844007,0.02338645,0.00012539577,0.0000058868227,0.97432524,0.00088230753,0.00046534344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010790382,0.000012600389,0.00380508,0.00020462177,0.000021903905,6.3768493e-7,0.0478716,0.000017713108,0.000017669356,0.06190239,0.885726,0.00031188538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33632877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29880887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95444375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034097573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007276393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323286950","doi":"10.23977/aetp.2023.070108","title":"The Dilemma of Vice Chancellors of Law and Its Improvement—Based on the Analysis of Court Personnel","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Southwest Minzu University","keywords":"Law; Enthusiasm; Dilemma; Political science; Medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.03201949962098506,"score_gpt":0.421533128389899,"score_spread":0.38951362876891393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323286950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7852374,0.0007890566,0.000015058217,0.19980463,0.00034383324,0.00015588525,0.00001591197,0.000010249894,0.013627968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973898,0.0014755982,0.000068831825,0.0008593428,0.000017092721,0.000057464502,0.000005789732,0.0000021122835,0.00012398565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993781,0.00008053443,0.0002084067,0.00012660665,0.00010111776,0.000105270316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789965,0.0015640742,0.00022041399,0.00014489847,0.0001591769,0.000011781489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071823277,0.0000462034,0.00011237778,0.00041068796,0.00023980165,0.0000045507195,0.00017977544,0.000080220045,0.000070749484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059475505,0.000032702454,0.000019716277,0.0024681292,0.0010007486,0.00010373,0.000013057156,0.00015219997,0.0000013688793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019567953,0.000089731824,0.007227542,0.0000062071886,0.000039196384,3.9585004e-8,0.0029390485,0.0000315033,0.000304289,0.9868335,0.00010013585,0.00240922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007062814,0.0003659288,0.15793408,0.000053843076,0.00021014884,0.0000012262925,0.0690202,0.00085638533,0.0014140737,0.409012,0.36017674,0.00024911418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015164712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010263941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57782155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008886139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001084343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36872998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323350815","doi":"10.32920/22229503","title":"Some Reflections of a Métis Law Student and Assistant Professor on Indigenous Legal Education in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenization; Indigenous; Law; Sociology; Racism; Decolonization; Political science; Legal education; Colonialism; Subject (documents); Library science; Anthropology; Politics","score_opus":0.0729173356117904,"score_gpt":0.45615788326439116,"score_spread":0.38324054765260074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323350815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77581745,0.00014118719,0.0000070292567,0.084263645,0.0066877925,0.0014296651,0.000067222085,0.00006821721,0.13151778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770223,0.00017590378,0.00020873755,0.0011678924,0.00025300885,0.00021657703,0.000037421843,0.000012609184,0.020905579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984255,0.000254474,0.00038748063,0.00026384447,0.00045276206,0.00021597082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893683,0.00025776497,0.00027405654,0.00021369537,0.0002402457,0.000077382814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072440103,0.0001098692,0.00017943818,0.00022713743,0.00039510638,0.00015883386,0.00019342425,0.00012564735,0.00007665792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002684193,0.00011281493,0.000023221026,0.0004791143,0.00008201748,0.00024673942,0.00009819915,0.00069925934,0.000007222896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010651073,0.00042991232,0.004572145,0.000060768238,0.00003840454,0.0000020098098,0.03894981,0.000039546376,0.00001145623,0.9482387,0.006370212,0.0012763982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003252453,0.000083111016,0.19571888,0.0003851099,0.000069617454,0.0000016986829,0.3037049,0.0000070927485,0.000113782706,0.028562926,0.47040626,0.00062137994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91967577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016775556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05110245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9542769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323350902","doi":"10.32920/22229503.v1","title":"Some Reflections of a Métis Law Student and Assistant Professor on Indigenous Legal Education in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenization; Indigenous; Law; Sociology; Racism; Decolonization; Legal education; Political science; Colonialism; Subject (documents); Library science; Anthropology; Politics","score_opus":0.0729173356117904,"score_gpt":0.45615788326439116,"score_spread":0.38324054765260074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323350902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77581745,0.00014118719,0.0000070292567,0.084263645,0.0066877925,0.0014296651,0.000067222085,0.00006821721,0.13151778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770223,0.00017590378,0.00020873755,0.0011678924,0.00025300885,0.00021657703,0.000037421843,0.000012609184,0.020905579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984255,0.000254474,0.00038748063,0.00026384447,0.00045276206,0.00021597082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893683,0.00025776497,0.00027405654,0.00021369537,0.0002402457,0.000077382814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072440103,0.0001098692,0.00017943818,0.00022713743,0.00039510638,0.00015883386,0.00019342425,0.00012564735,0.00007665792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002684193,0.00011281493,0.000023221026,0.0004791143,0.00008201748,0.00024673942,0.00009819915,0.00069925934,0.000007222896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010651073,0.00042991232,0.004572145,0.000060768238,0.00003840454,0.0000020098098,0.03894981,0.000039546376,0.00001145623,0.9482387,0.006370212,0.0012763982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003252453,0.000083111016,0.19571888,0.0003851099,0.000069617454,0.0000016986829,0.3037049,0.0000070927485,0.000113782706,0.028562926,0.47040626,0.00062137994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91967577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016775556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05110245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9542769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323352380","doi":"10.32920/22229332.v1","title":"More lawyers, more litigation? Exploring trends in litigation and the legal profession in Ontario, Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Civil litigation; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.11502316609871688,"score_gpt":0.383537077166203,"score_spread":0.2685139110674861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323352380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5959838,0.000023134688,0.0000062394924,0.37045565,0.0018275743,0.00044393702,0.000008480399,0.000053504882,0.031197688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9595373,0.00004505162,0.0001529165,0.0010126646,0.00017894726,0.00047411988,0.00019889632,0.0000131201205,0.038386967],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808043,0.00037902457,0.0004445893,0.00033247142,0.00050457957,0.0002589074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989114,0.00044665247,0.00019990219,0.00022692069,0.00014115282,0.00007397485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015861157,0.00014741492,0.00019872363,0.00030287576,0.0003863947,0.00032525268,0.00022856907,0.00016971928,0.0004261557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060283364,0.000120113196,0.00003123646,0.00089884724,0.00020924435,0.00078447984,0.00015592144,0.0014666538,0.000002947274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057125093,0.00007825658,0.11044851,0.000053650103,0.000029016792,0.000014771678,0.44155934,0.00062089576,0.0000027982244,0.41824356,0.022468522,0.006423532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008814963,0.0000054820553,0.59242636,0.00032878597,0.000020071417,7.421653e-7,0.25206304,0.00044637072,0.000016178561,0.009922991,0.14350253,0.00038596857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48197782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013540616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075161466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323352533","doi":"10.32920/22229332","title":"More lawyers, more litigation? Exploring trends in litigation and the legal profession in Ontario, Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil litigation; Argument (complex analysis); Legal profession; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.11502316609871688,"score_gpt":0.383537077166203,"score_spread":0.2685139110674861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323352533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5959838,0.000023134688,0.0000062394924,0.37045565,0.0018275743,0.00044393702,0.000008480399,0.000053504882,0.031197688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9595373,0.00004505162,0.0001529165,0.0010126646,0.00017894726,0.00047411988,0.00019889632,0.0000131201205,0.038386967],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808043,0.00037902457,0.0004445893,0.00033247142,0.00050457957,0.0002589074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989114,0.00044665247,0.00019990219,0.00022692069,0.00014115282,0.00007397485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015861157,0.00014741492,0.00019872363,0.00030287576,0.0003863947,0.00032525268,0.00022856907,0.00016971928,0.0004261557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060283364,0.000120113196,0.00003123646,0.00089884724,0.00020924435,0.00078447984,0.00015592144,0.0014666538,0.000002947274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057125093,0.00007825658,0.11044851,0.000053650103,0.000029016792,0.000014771678,0.44155934,0.00062089576,0.0000027982244,0.41824356,0.022468522,0.006423532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008814963,0.0000054820553,0.59242636,0.00032878597,0.000020071417,7.421653e-7,0.25206304,0.00044637072,0.000016178561,0.009922991,0.14350253,0.00038596857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48197782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013540616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075161466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323572194","doi":"10.32920/22227781.v1","title":"Barriers to the Profession: Inaction in Ontario, Canada and its Consequences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Legal profession; Medical profession; Limiting; Perception; White (mutation); Political science; White paper; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Medicine; Psychology; Medical education; Engineering","score_opus":0.09219894863678113,"score_gpt":0.3919780751482516,"score_spread":0.2997791265114705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323572194","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29925674,0.000018649289,0.000004166139,0.6323446,0.0046320036,0.0006174774,0.0000066534008,0.000036431822,0.063083254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9314276,0.000026889418,0.0000444385,0.004168299,0.00010157864,0.00013744134,0.000007147915,0.000004088708,0.06408251],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896806,0.00023916266,0.00017278153,0.00019330053,0.00027730866,0.00014937746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923354,0.00027780407,0.00008747231,0.00011445069,0.00014465513,0.00014209787],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009954674,0.00007196863,0.000083572944,0.000075471566,0.00054916635,0.00017998478,0.00018822712,0.00010576614,0.0018033767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021846124,0.000053516345,0.000009530832,0.00037623176,0.00005831981,0.00016211672,0.000107746564,0.00080621324,0.000020140062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022948412,0.00001886011,0.08279367,0.000037111477,0.00003785156,0.000012391528,0.19343309,0.0001940387,0.000017837876,0.27535135,0.44688645,0.0011943901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032779062,0.0000040703335,0.030935697,0.000049192826,0.0000058853943,4.4788612e-7,0.12429118,0.000009738263,0.000016059423,0.0024360195,0.8420927,0.00012621985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63217086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013643634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0377763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323657510","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2023.27035","title":"How Engaged in Legal Planning for Incapacity and Death Are Canadians? A Mixed-Methods Survey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Queen's University; Lethbridge College; University of Lethbridge; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.26832127291172087,"score_gpt":0.5362373010617011,"score_spread":0.2679160281499802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323657510","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4131469,0.00012729861,0.00023760652,0.5829818,0.0005549604,0.00048460072,0.00021631575,0.00009735642,0.0021531126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921558,0.00004854657,0.0015685635,0.0037094632,0.00043378523,0.00009387951,0.00005018913,0.000011883452,0.001927928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598974,0.0030658178,0.0001687477,0.00019398441,0.0001293911,0.00045231942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622184,0.0030984199,0.00011148842,0.00011519565,0.00020621758,0.00024683177],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073316265,0.00007995254,0.00014289448,0.00043260312,0.0012726698,0.0002641472,0.00010443018,0.00011988188,0.000005172406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025520938,0.00008935377,0.000019506688,0.0016863855,0.00006133376,0.0004217338,0.000016950313,0.0006250474,0.0000032245448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034654255,0.000036424903,0.39194185,0.00016400262,0.000014590567,0.000007749146,0.16305,0.000005517177,0.000016155254,0.36278093,0.025457455,0.056490693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014533641,0.000015583724,0.62174785,0.000023273156,0.0000015182194,0.0000011115368,0.045078494,0.00004516085,0.0000054568504,0.0024238462,0.33041006,0.000102295315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8486424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8027369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5792724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031956393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003085167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98268753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327747197","doi":"10.32920/22229509.v1","title":"Towards Implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action in Law Schools: A Settler Harm Reduction Approach to Racial Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Indigenous Peoples and Indigenous Legal Orders in Canadian Legal Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canadian Bar Association; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Indigenous; Prejudice (legal term); Political science; Harm; Law; Commission; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07295356932481475,"score_gpt":0.3892679816070466,"score_spread":0.3163144122822319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327747197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94399744,0.00009761759,0.00012734675,0.03949549,0.0013947103,0.0024877277,0.000041200776,0.000061589104,0.012296869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539685,0.00022818705,0.0014457499,0.001196152,0.00041004943,0.00045320645,0.00016998306,0.000027554095,0.0006722818],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973416,0.0005228775,0.00056026125,0.0006354907,0.00034814127,0.0005916471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986429,0.00021334914,0.00026247962,0.00022100205,0.00027674861,0.00038350545],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003225614,0.00024098644,0.00025730382,0.0008792,0.0014735926,0.0015312486,0.00021017827,0.0002936829,0.000017131133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001666855,0.0002405261,0.000024994399,0.0011244309,0.000099545476,0.0011106792,0.00018114419,0.001054534,0.0000050809035],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086690714,0.00020501329,0.011578166,0.00023721435,0.000060742634,0.0000015856499,0.83693844,0.00044523046,0.00009413172,0.032337435,0.0017945227,0.11622082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050522573,0.00006056174,0.11556877,0.0003464085,0.00005804109,0.000013742469,0.68703914,0.00023891298,0.00004110626,0.0012225051,0.19410393,0.0008016718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9489912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96061313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1923094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014126879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010485858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361002872","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2023.2172884","title":"Not Logic, but Experience: Teaching Canadian Human Rights Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; Empathy; International human rights law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15657521720835102,"score_gpt":0.4789292384083872,"score_spread":0.3223540212000362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361002872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033432834,0.007164594,2.8820241e-7,0.36102638,0.00044024136,0.0004892498,0.000045283465,0.00006186683,0.5973393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95192426,0.0113282455,0.00006563338,0.03330953,0.0001997704,0.00008078611,0.000008394987,0.000007814296,0.0030755408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984089,0.00043502433,0.00029078947,0.00015442187,0.0002777307,0.0004331338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853915,0.00034664635,0.0002459711,0.00029111977,0.000275067,0.00030203784],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016196024,0.00010398583,0.0003114711,0.00033042446,0.0039596935,0.00005140591,0.00042676867,0.000016915286,0.00020733317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011008803,0.000074650015,0.00006427935,0.0016600897,0.001504882,0.00019381818,0.000023093466,0.00025358022,0.00014849231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.397531e-7,0.0000035309688,0.00011238488,0.00006439515,0.00004523313,0.0000048182296,0.02474187,1.9332661e-7,0.0000052856262,0.8675139,0.10390055,0.0036074005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001634704,0.0000132710575,0.0011310071,0.00024291856,0.000024662235,8.299348e-7,0.030860912,1.5159603e-7,0.0000051273532,0.0017811591,0.9658239,0.00009973253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99755454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9184914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003109406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010355893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99733704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029483","doi":"10.1353/sch.2015.0025","title":"The Clerks of the Four Horsemen (Part II, George Sutherland and Pierce Butler)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Economic Justice; Law; Civil servant; Peck (Imperial); Character (mathematics); Management; Sociology; Art history; Classics; History; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.1013316183136096,"score_gpt":0.3137323234569229,"score_spread":0.21240070514331333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60987896,0.0068584643,0.000038239494,0.1839993,0.007764303,0.0002698604,0.000005875715,0.000015178121,0.19116983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685931,0.0003660276,0.000104189174,0.0006152081,0.000713851,0.0000016841101,2.2054714e-7,0.000007541218,0.029598167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870896,0.00025516763,0.00033523125,0.0000567931,0.00051494595,0.00012891955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982596,0.00024085878,0.0005643715,0.00014950242,0.00067247846,0.00011318734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031248135,0.00005739133,0.0001091287,0.000050117284,0.0005211133,0.000038192426,0.0003198317,0.000055606222,0.00021421784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001178065,0.00003495108,0.0000575535,0.0001130715,0.00040603994,0.0004245957,0.000036398804,0.00036243736,0.000005692707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004633124,0.000072806484,0.0043173367,0.0000034545608,0.000042684125,0.0000011358139,0.039953627,0.0000045117677,0.00019197962,0.011747742,0.9417022,0.0019162153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020346165,0.000044784847,0.0031025272,0.000013417842,0.0000299022,0.000009928589,0.010303429,0.0000043788123,0.00001147425,0.0007314999,0.98550016,0.000045019486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006442221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084146037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35871416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034746926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019251546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40080348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361191514","doi":"10.32920/22341337.v1","title":"The E-Team Project: A Teamwork Approach to Clinical Legal Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Notice; Legal education; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Passion; Public relations; Political science; Law; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.23590821743648063,"score_gpt":0.5363241850429693,"score_spread":0.3004159676064887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361191514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007896484,0.000037628382,0.0009764974,0.17548878,0.012795844,0.0016907189,0.0000058427063,0.00033846137,0.8078766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12317345,0.00047939393,0.021057617,0.008664268,0.011269806,0.002451793,0.00014173292,0.000062568695,0.83269936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971771,0.0007822545,0.00062699546,0.000515912,0.0005570329,0.00034068307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971212,0.001163272,0.00029167975,0.00065312185,0.0006070415,0.00016368709],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005492363,0.00015737671,0.00018622587,0.00015943684,0.0014238972,0.0017060317,0.00089671486,0.000360167,0.00006706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007972751,0.00011708157,0.0001419098,0.0012281076,0.00022553244,0.00027991054,0.00035737004,0.0016221597,0.00086934876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006103126,0.00024357505,0.00038630204,0.000006889279,0.000021310785,3.4238752e-8,0.007478205,0.000007325484,6.6057126e-8,0.36960053,0.60963666,0.012613022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030097854,0.000010444179,0.0014324099,0.000019325384,0.000019600944,3.607501e-7,0.036748014,0.000028328197,3.4542714e-7,0.006591135,0.95495534,0.00016457349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045276076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062378976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3630094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020970104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019011742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361270095","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2705219/v1","title":"Teaching, learning, and assessment of law on medical students' cognitive, affective and psychomotor skills: a systematic review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Psychomotor learning; Medical education; Psychology; Curriculum; Checklist; Legal education; Cognitive apprenticeship; Cognition; Medicine; Pedagogy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.15904229704291103,"score_gpt":0.6396357525131124,"score_spread":0.4805934554702014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361270095","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000069627436,0.9498394,0.0000033947965,0.0018302514,0.00010740015,0.0049657538,0.000029033232,0.000044857094,0.043172956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00020514712,0.9933235,0.000016821257,0.00015142318,0.00013240709,0.0011215318,0.000039205446,0.000030379935,0.0049795797],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98368984,0.011506426,0.00064510584,0.00041971204,0.0034000443,0.00033888157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857636,0.012714085,0.0004480564,0.00019342285,0.00060228835,0.00027851565],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0244213,0.00019777384,0.0012505321,0.00037420954,0.00088860164,0.00032666227,0.0004190946,0.00025377984,0.0002923337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035967287,0.00014818467,0.00012857723,0.00095264363,0.0005644805,0.00018762427,0.00020392577,0.0031040513,0.00007593687],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013504012,0.00036960226,0.000048340524,0.8560318,0.00024054605,0.000008710225,0.002739248,1.0173248e-9,2.91116e-9,0.077231884,0.0010161604,0.062312353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007708131,0.00013343123,0.000017049731,0.4699319,0.00021651188,0.0000026500988,0.0017179425,3.7721676e-7,2.7521152e-9,0.000067559886,0.5277487,0.00008678261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022061903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057588186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52673256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002169334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019693337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362674241","doi":"10.52547/johepal.4.1.161","title":"Examining Complexities of Equity and Social Justice Education: An Interview with Prof. Ann Lopez","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Higher Education Policy And Leadership Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; University of Toronto","keywords":"Equity (law); Social justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.7094451482619862,"score_gpt":0.5597629988319869,"score_spread":0.14968214942999936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362674241","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13544549,0.008938292,0.000009756824,0.82946855,0.0018984863,0.0002383108,0.0000057586617,0.000036657362,0.023958711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97538465,0.0006594909,0.00027032557,0.006421109,0.002566394,0.000013906893,0.000004098156,0.000008402134,0.014671647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998675,0.0004035092,0.00035351203,0.00010667453,0.0002875148,0.00017377456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979556,0.00045453233,0.000514144,0.00006595715,0.0009276708,0.00008207221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015190017,0.00009682167,0.0002210547,0.00034181433,0.000611938,0.00013835976,0.00013136172,0.000048897782,0.000045913606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005351777,0.00008001866,0.000021589394,0.00072345586,0.00063054747,0.0009805101,0.00004304077,0.00022423014,0.0000024536487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038414306,0.00036256597,0.0031605745,0.00087106554,0.00017780799,4.9128477e-7,0.38475862,0.0000010982347,0.000026348704,0.47356507,0.11049387,0.026544092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000133521,0.00012429101,0.06139329,0.00016669036,0.000111185785,0.000008677083,0.63124007,2.4317163e-7,0.000006805799,0.006605774,0.30011603,0.00009342621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003159214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015293695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8399391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008903639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47226286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366117334","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4419062","title":"Putting the Bar Exam to the Test: An Examination of the Predictive Validity of Bar Exam Outcomes on Lawyering Effectiveness","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Test (biology); Predictive validity; Psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.044812075539805055,"score_gpt":0.3690551478502108,"score_spread":0.3242430723104058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366117334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97323567,0.00002520487,0.00036554103,0.02171041,0.00059481984,0.0004420965,0.000005576174,0.000028295013,0.003592407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894,0.00009947944,0.000014320388,0.00016688513,0.0002732424,0.000025020538,9.938731e-7,0.000010244884,0.00046982916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667484,0.0017456475,0.00026044302,0.00013000448,0.00058626174,0.0006028074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99557483,0.0035073983,0.0003173111,0.0002368468,0.00032318095,0.00004042456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015019117,0.00008903435,0.00011908909,0.00008676907,0.0012559205,0.000090971174,0.00056598167,0.000051122945,0.000027081947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00708935,0.000047612615,0.000076431395,0.0010470235,0.00012990758,0.0004147866,0.0000480968,0.0012021983,0.000013342006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048502436,0.00042160804,0.10742474,0.000021837277,0.00023284956,6.7091275e-7,0.07705511,0.003245468,0.0022788618,0.73288685,0.00029122716,0.076092295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016625345,0.00031090688,0.9299445,0.00004228216,0.00004777864,0.00000624658,0.034819134,0.00010741386,0.00081912754,0.030332893,0.0033291366,0.00007432602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007863978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021439593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8225198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046019838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019901842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9659652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366777588","doi":"10.56726/irjmets36633","title":"NOVEL MECHANISM FOR STUDENT GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Mechanism (biology); Political science; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.10568483590667765,"score_gpt":0.4898452469506097,"score_spread":0.38416041104393206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366777588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5268646,0.00006646842,0.34729904,0.1216628,0.002182505,0.0003301201,0.00000675407,0.00009924035,0.0014884797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934315,0.0002414549,0.0058567156,0.00002612302,0.00009965041,0.000016943666,7.639367e-7,0.0000041646717,0.00032269504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986813,0.000019677336,0.00022355166,0.00011490705,0.0007481309,0.00021239666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732316,0.00038185573,0.00008553381,0.00006215776,0.0020964814,0.00005082562],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004720718,0.00003697978,0.000060343635,0.0025901136,0.0002984766,0.00014003474,0.0005512205,0.00006255254,0.000008163223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013028837,0.000037569807,0.000011102478,0.0031042509,0.00033574342,0.0007758672,0.000074060954,0.0003634348,0.0000025727484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009743306,0.00003407067,0.0014439644,0.0000033062263,0.0000049173973,0.0000015166032,0.001684175,0.0034814458,0.008802213,0.98336303,0.00013075101,0.00104086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024291724,0.00042512192,0.031475697,0.00048085084,0.000010724761,0.00010016806,0.021189395,0.2891722,0.010331976,0.5479095,0.09600124,0.00047391996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020928195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028036384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4665669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001755676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062555197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99528486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367851661","doi":"","title":"The Dalhousie Dentistry Story: A Case for Proportionality, Professionalism, and the Promotion of Moral Character","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Proportionality (law); Promotion (chess); Psychology; Dentistry; Medicine; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6031934809514475,"score_gpt":0.6526919066288669,"score_spread":0.049498425677419355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367851661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9337964,0.0024672048,0.0001475925,0.056276195,0.001783944,0.0017280077,0.000055302622,0.000017238512,0.0037281325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956284,0.00043510005,0.00011709072,0.0003259904,0.0002980657,0.0001937448,0.0000128149195,0.000012648439,0.0029761053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974769,0.000950852,0.00053045544,0.00017138207,0.0006808349,0.00018962263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960763,0.0010417438,0.0011854792,0.00022074768,0.001354865,0.000120904915],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008952275,0.000107801054,0.0002409833,0.00012268688,0.0013594283,0.0011632361,0.00086066657,0.000073393436,0.000646409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037094825,0.000065072156,0.00007535968,0.00056620914,0.0006994398,0.002620339,0.00023083403,0.00035307516,0.0000022886318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017813138,0.0016022936,0.2771807,0.00024795873,0.0005295756,0.00006130299,0.040350534,0.000013927332,0.0025325203,0.32816365,0.31041437,0.03712183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024097417,0.000023538301,0.28270814,0.00024279283,0.00023279876,0.00020802145,0.014650368,0.00008445102,0.0009717952,0.1389427,0.5591182,0.00040746405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031459313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084272947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2487038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071758615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001353693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367857059","doi":"10.14507/er.v30.3735","title":"Review of Duck and cover: Confronting and correcting dubious practices in education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Political science; Sociology; History; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.07656885864188614,"score_gpt":0.48789012800544745,"score_spread":0.4113212693635613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367857059","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018955285,0.77316064,0.000002386977,0.15859519,0.0017405087,0.0010957251,0.0000019893937,0.000046134308,0.04640212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028592126,0.9548659,0.00038383764,0.012251792,0.0001842817,0.00013237608,0.000035627316,0.000007806269,0.0035462952],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986758,0.00040645126,0.0004426393,0.00018957505,0.0001595139,0.00012599443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790937,0.0006030652,0.0008965903,0.00014503054,0.00037991852,0.00006600703],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030763783,0.00007560906,0.00020922725,0.00013529009,0.00019331662,0.000068482004,0.00008535052,0.0000381386,0.0003315313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015877021,0.00007825383,0.000021081381,0.0014287046,0.00007667552,0.0007171408,0.000021661006,0.00017950116,0.00005552655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019061008,0.00018777548,0.009541889,0.020986415,0.000008914482,1.3793384e-7,0.008254956,6.4428946e-8,0.000017086273,0.013859326,0.2846051,0.66253644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003397602,0.0000064466826,0.0065281615,0.02200633,0.000039567592,0.000007481978,0.008517109,0.0000016551182,0.0000029543826,0.00025241685,0.96251583,0.00008804602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037601562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025379143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67791075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059749378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029727467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058610","doi":"10.7202/1098594ar","title":"Making Meaning: Indigenous Legal Education and Student Action","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Internship; Meaning (existential); Legal education; Practice of law; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Action (physics); Legal research; Legal profession; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10166086787338059,"score_gpt":0.4433395643533455,"score_spread":0.3416786964799649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11977083,0.00013591525,0.000030277071,0.021455012,0.00427131,0.00018539364,0.0000058795767,0.00004485234,0.8541005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624056,0.00003817434,0.0003308346,0.0015080553,0.0004874876,0.000017679964,0.0000024777974,0.0000069151697,0.0013678067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988462,0.00030721838,0.00017069829,0.00009432087,0.000423274,0.00015831797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994647,0.000058308255,0.00019985059,0.00005809562,0.00014392445,0.00007510775],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010995978,0.00005038813,0.000055415392,0.00009611477,0.014913197,0.00036824716,0.0001310533,0.000023062667,0.000923412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009638763,0.000055022094,0.000023365204,0.00028480677,0.000046842186,0.00087800215,0.000040243667,0.0006449761,0.000008715206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009121185,0.0002637717,0.0009326802,0.0000019799766,0.000018460976,0.0000036431607,0.024525242,0.000027692817,0.000032352233,0.9324874,0.0012674101,0.04043022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007687354,0.000032348482,0.0010701275,0.0000034247728,0.000012392035,0.00015608314,0.06250984,0.0000014833303,0.000009166105,0.0017921323,0.9342709,0.000065178436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005857774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010619635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93300354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044563753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030377175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376607321","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4433831","title":"Supervising Students in Clinical Legal Education: Handbook with Exercises","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Mathematics education; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.038610730692587567,"score_gpt":0.4456353583074357,"score_spread":0.40702462761484814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376607321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9293889,0.0009744138,0.00024555766,0.044856753,0.0014233198,0.0002609063,5.842764e-7,0.0000831252,0.022766467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696249,0.0055554034,0.000117645344,0.0006338745,0.00093801937,0.000015069418,0.0000048644183,0.000012888551,0.023097353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753636,0.00033637878,0.00036220232,0.00015672328,0.0004992206,0.0011090965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999236,0.00020755862,0.00013773901,0.0001090288,0.00020941853,0.000100255835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005835422,0.000079764344,0.00012439568,0.00024612862,0.000629505,0.00043609852,0.00033708714,0.000069204136,0.00013013768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005613061,0.000070122434,0.00004617828,0.0012411869,0.00011141601,0.0010245336,0.00002147737,0.0021131362,0.00016707393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009225073,0.0006371169,0.33136064,0.00000427295,0.0000727328,0.000007729733,0.009850125,0.000014420584,0.000007096522,0.5607936,0.0065697236,0.090590306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012824672,0.00028136594,0.09063517,0.00014841814,0.00005450276,0.00010449509,0.1680324,0.000009415999,0.0000067730734,0.08688883,0.652194,0.0003621634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002720289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029540276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6456243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006663879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027862288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98816806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239643","doi":"10.1515/9780773569195-009","title":"The Ontario Advocacy Act: Representing Persons with Intellectual Disabilities","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual disability; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.0389393197477739,"score_gpt":0.27168604161354676,"score_spread":0.23274672186577286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010364583,0.0000014787773,0.000019434061,0.004751425,0.00033666837,0.00049605576,0.00003665217,0.0001528408,0.9941018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070833433,0.00010471829,0.000088661596,0.00015454701,0.00020449614,0.0000033990568,0.000020641959,0.00003424839,0.99230593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980837,0.00018268709,0.00023109144,0.0004749506,0.0005874127,0.00044013854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963977,0.0021077106,0.00033533497,0.00056393445,0.00042330186,0.00017203439],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040895448,0.00030100744,0.0002535337,0.00014117228,0.004278169,0.00032829898,0.00066287594,0.00029143557,0.00083104294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006133435,0.00026292863,0.00015938497,0.00005131894,0.0011548487,0.0004608267,0.00021859318,0.0012954022,0.00003307902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010480131,0.000020465577,0.000050797087,0.000008977419,0.00014761774,0.0000172875,0.052107498,0.0000026617022,1.5282137e-7,0.93129116,0.014979493,0.0012690786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018618602,0.000036613805,0.000012308828,0.00006802068,0.00014299764,0.0000024203928,0.03333393,7.734624e-7,0.0000050900553,0.00072814233,0.9651514,0.00033208827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2884334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012128995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95017195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010416186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014045766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377250550","doi":"10.1515/9780228012252-018","title":"The Limits of Adjudication in the First-Year Curriculum: The Recurring History of Legal Process at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Law; Legal education; Legal history; Curriculum; Legal process; Political science; Process (computing); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0373865117675953,"score_gpt":0.27902580026400925,"score_spread":0.24163928849641395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377250550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033506632,0.0000400237,0.0000018007989,0.003455189,0.00019873078,0.00058081915,0.00017998918,0.0000122317615,0.99519616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35894957,0.0009309439,0.000024862687,0.00014791999,0.00004827089,0.0000032569608,0.000036593334,0.000019213503,0.63983935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834645,0.00036742055,0.0002759467,0.00020336147,0.00065749674,0.00014935358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997313,0.0005691066,0.0010704793,0.0004868553,0.0005315765,0.000028931803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009588759,0.00013876332,0.00022060021,0.000044329274,0.0012241838,0.000010007848,0.0012637076,0.00013653423,0.0002186718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010710239,0.00009625143,0.0001482689,0.000055704844,0.0012727155,0.00032115224,0.00022670638,0.00048760962,7.915204e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006988978,0.00004433023,0.000034460092,0.000047233058,0.00006228806,0.0000011320269,0.024865704,0.000021857382,0.000002026887,0.9694489,0.0051197032,0.000282464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018406752,0.000033502667,0.000116554766,0.000057910238,0.00012655518,2.9188786e-7,0.020320537,0.0000033041633,0.000026670039,0.000278577,0.9787553,0.0000967046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1683763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008035958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010091824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052367325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94155556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377250570","doi":"10.1515/9780228012252","title":"Law, Life, and the Teaching of Legal History","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal history; Legal education; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.026178121770781826,"score_gpt":0.26128498455647714,"score_spread":0.23510686278569531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377250570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000039823412,0.000009904626,0.0000060014327,0.0044644694,0.00061497046,0.00035205376,0.00009373341,0.00006567185,0.99438924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031853747,0.00007698488,0.00007191673,0.0011624846,0.00014439586,0.0000029156533,0.000021331995,0.000017090813,0.9953175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801874,0.0008833123,0.00019980593,0.00025704707,0.00045624934,0.00018484815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982553,0.00072723435,0.00044920875,0.00030262346,0.00015746841,0.00010817849],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009427643,0.00015609743,0.00026783298,0.00014018861,0.0018647995,0.000047520323,0.00051247724,0.00017378689,0.00028057376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026993031,0.00015638188,0.00011524665,0.000024941672,0.0011749099,0.0003572879,0.0002887735,0.0012789079,0.0000019264392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000625511,0.000017332173,7.7486453e-7,0.000022840288,0.0000701393,0.000005707217,0.006276065,0.0000014916966,2.4657732e-7,0.87726593,0.11604622,0.00023071379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004550452,0.000014633306,0.0000019833426,0.00001772263,0.0001334867,5.23504e-7,0.0030279392,0.0000014038822,8.283608e-7,0.0008193707,0.995361,0.00016612021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07342642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003345518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8793147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009297011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014961197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377260962","doi":"10.1515/9780773572898-006","title":"Turmoil in Toronto: The Provincial University","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regional science; Media studies; Political science; Geography; Economic history; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.022874217198337363,"score_gpt":0.2701043623053456,"score_spread":0.24723014510700825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377260962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010225207,0.000002691054,0.000008804299,0.0062765623,0.0004080926,0.00054132775,0.00018039205,0.000117646945,0.99245423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006267726,0.00027446344,0.00007779395,0.00039144885,0.00036073176,5.55026e-7,0.00002125386,0.000022313996,0.9925837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983243,0.00026557525,0.00019164101,0.00040410817,0.00046933253,0.0003450825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985965,0.00025748528,0.00031045906,0.00040146126,0.00029061147,0.00014349945],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042331184,0.00025349463,0.00024291822,0.00013752427,0.0014424169,0.00008652364,0.00080174167,0.0004677703,0.00071028003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006535115,0.00026934853,0.00014385727,0.000044720207,0.00044410376,0.000697133,0.00022757029,0.00091752183,0.00003560663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000612732,0.000027175101,0.0000041123403,0.000008219377,0.000041612057,0.00003765572,0.0027175513,0.0000026105113,4.229895e-7,0.9841574,0.008321421,0.004620562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031915074,0.0000167626,0.000038716917,0.000037592323,0.00008500618,5.0073055e-7,0.0038237656,0.0000025257257,0.0000031515015,0.0003893627,0.9949728,0.00031064881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19789912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008887874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00272703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009490554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378437532","doi":"10.1515/9781553393429-003","title":"Ontario ’s System of Higher Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.02972352600579627,"score_gpt":0.2677917184839233,"score_spread":0.23806819247812702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378437532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006066221,0.000001126916,0.000019406221,0.0013911192,0.0014967727,0.00036761785,0.000058429894,0.00010100673,0.9965584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017887505,0.000011365812,0.00017596944,0.00020688983,0.0002551428,0.0000018812757,0.00003965234,0.000022615855,0.981399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986368,0.000141616,0.00026987703,0.00031811293,0.00043173146,0.00020190958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980213,0.00014464985,0.00061679364,0.00040777403,0.00065953034,0.00014995663],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026819203,0.00021235381,0.00030325845,0.00025478544,0.0006475473,0.00005514092,0.00042192554,0.00042929032,0.00074177637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002333883,0.00025842446,0.0001396808,0.000028016802,0.00023012857,0.000220649,0.00008988784,0.00056291255,0.000052205185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020763215,0.000020450103,0.000007947752,0.00006940762,0.00006814848,0.000002212773,0.0013350052,8.1948343e-7,8.409508e-7,0.9769622,0.020611946,0.00090027606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014627112,0.000019642932,0.000036962894,0.00017640798,0.00017045134,3.804547e-7,0.0005399838,1.7978813e-7,0.000012172451,0.00060701807,0.9980384,0.00025209508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2756157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007672394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97742647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013251932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001721396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378439642","doi":"10.1515/9780773573239","title":"My Life at the Bar and Beyond","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.023952508837816914,"score_gpt":0.27008290070856916,"score_spread":0.24613039187075225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378439642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001379554,0.0000072274943,0.0000044421204,0.021910094,0.0003698064,0.00041780187,0.0001997384,0.000101589256,0.9769755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006216357,0.00030979034,0.00008146228,0.0026500444,0.00043752522,0.0000023218545,0.000041670537,0.000022606155,0.9958329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983783,0.00031564315,0.00017896219,0.00037048446,0.00045185914,0.00030476582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983451,0.00048223723,0.0002916772,0.0003798062,0.00025984176,0.00024135761],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041297343,0.00022258211,0.00021745672,0.00012973201,0.002792703,0.00015250084,0.00048542712,0.00037789549,0.0005793084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018294848,0.00021290142,0.00009575766,0.000049574257,0.0006956212,0.0003788755,0.00031817242,0.0007593149,0.000073369425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018205195,0.000012070522,0.0000030077917,0.00001053676,0.000057715475,0.0000059640697,0.002678436,0.0000013701491,4.228324e-7,0.71505475,0.280995,0.0011625228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002157347,0.000012609195,0.000018642017,0.000018747554,0.00013882887,7.7376365e-7,0.0016546303,0.0000010370119,0.000006802074,0.00041199068,0.9972645,0.00025571606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005094494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006618024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7162695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063441275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010337497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380142288","doi":"10.32920/22223248.v1","title":"Law and Technology in Legal Education: A Systemic Approach at Ryerson","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Key (lock); Legal practice; Engineering ethics; Legal research; Legal service; Practice of law; Political science; Law; Sociology; Legal profession; Engineering management; Engineering; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.06414862003054714,"score_gpt":0.38949205250930413,"score_spread":0.32534343247875697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380142288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02551174,0.0004017072,0.000054079283,0.17028528,0.0021127532,0.00075497973,0.000006014815,0.00033466477,0.8005388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.915813,0.00016313692,0.0013849778,0.0008992863,0.00029381822,0.00040325918,0.000050148312,0.000014679442,0.08097768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881274,0.00015194906,0.00026479323,0.00037300226,0.0001986501,0.00019886163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992056,0.00012046675,0.0001563198,0.00026874285,0.00019013553,0.000058723417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000798481,0.00011372425,0.00017214235,0.00042406065,0.00034088548,0.00027417627,0.00025256287,0.00044358583,0.00012947423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004193339,0.0001190744,0.000021712875,0.0010249675,0.00026791205,0.00025287658,0.00026212822,0.0007642336,0.00012542661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019499867,0.00007418792,0.0020069976,0.000079378384,0.000008925333,6.586701e-7,0.0066694883,0.0000048380602,0.000009318959,0.9811301,0.009511033,0.00050312484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016528794,0.0000102091735,0.0005935763,0.00019105418,0.000027262186,0.000027019274,0.10310794,0.00008892339,0.000016211188,0.046097096,0.849266,0.00040942765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05838039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022828965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.935033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044591818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027998069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99500185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380229014","doi":"10.1515/9780773586475","title":"Telling it to the Judge","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.054758201044662794,"score_gpt":0.29095291247750193,"score_spread":0.23619471143283916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380229014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000011617489,8.78655e-7,0.00010700227,0.01589602,0.00089104637,0.00060881744,0.0001306782,0.00014193419,0.98222244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00046461035,0.000078401026,0.00027095227,0.0028087697,0.00044238812,0.000003854967,0.000023991877,0.000027904687,0.9958791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822176,0.00033671912,0.00020557226,0.00039429087,0.00046786264,0.00037382956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981766,0.00034887172,0.0002759181,0.00052783376,0.0004489243,0.00022189203],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062271196,0.00023027665,0.00021765874,0.00021805987,0.002216801,0.0001509307,0.00101746,0.00035733965,0.00040621066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018810722,0.00022346826,0.0001347932,0.000100109435,0.00024951666,0.00031806837,0.00023387733,0.0009209667,0.00027942267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016042946,0.0000153585,7.3767626e-7,0.000008794946,0.00004507934,0.000008230999,0.006457455,0.0000031659984,3.3578849e-7,0.7061852,0.28622976,0.0010298159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009366358,0.000018665496,0.0000031751579,0.000049552455,0.000112761874,3.3923087e-7,0.0020316648,6.2166583e-7,0.000021833157,0.00070467714,0.99667627,0.00028678984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019301351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008612788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7104465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005288516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010352798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380300480","doi":"","title":"LEARNING FROM BEAR-WALKER: INDIGENOUS LEGAL ORDERS AND INTERCULTURAL LEGAL EDUCATION IN CANADIAN LAW SCHOOLS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal education; Law; Political science; Legal pluralism; Legal research; Legal realism; Sociology","score_opus":0.19312281502476625,"score_gpt":0.578933036925031,"score_spread":0.3858102219002647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380300480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8854683,0.001260154,0.000003812998,0.008373904,0.001146603,0.0003535632,0.000013092418,0.000014961843,0.10336559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99476695,0.0014357872,0.00014045551,0.0010478743,0.00035494758,0.00002386155,0.000026674152,0.000017979128,0.0021854942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980071,0.00039900272,0.00047412515,0.00029938377,0.0003986156,0.00042172702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979156,0.00019548675,0.00071393274,0.00028947496,0.0004349978,0.00045047808],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016105545,0.00016532667,0.00029730154,0.0004989664,0.002596376,0.010330865,0.0016838749,0.00013592007,0.003815487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023376562,0.00016882789,0.000052161446,0.00045797726,0.00028766246,0.011380376,0.00020321607,0.0010525505,0.000029178378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004810927,0.00017385391,0.9083774,0.000013096207,0.00007983295,0.000014794727,0.018883063,0.00002915981,0.001861208,0.016059862,0.015064823,0.03939478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017968679,0.000004558629,0.5091599,0.00013308284,0.000020415197,0.0000031988172,0.009346729,0.000007511618,0.00018467117,0.002230725,0.47850657,0.00022296148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98897696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9086599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46344173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043671625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005674242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380421093","doi":"10.14264/0e10db9","title":"Access to Justice for First Nations People in Queensland: Exploring Complaints and Conciliation Experiences Through the Queensland Human Rights Commission","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The University of Queensland","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Commission; Economic Justice; Human rights; Political science; Law; Public administration; Mediation","score_opus":0.10596891579232613,"score_gpt":0.38292995462953006,"score_spread":0.2769610388372039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380421093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9307667,0.000131855,0.0003589017,0.022863055,0.0008208076,0.0011672338,0.00004924434,0.000029654411,0.04381254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937771,0.00019589065,0.00017165211,0.00010547564,0.0001398782,0.000026594376,0.0002548495,0.000008832784,0.0053197523],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867076,0.00029425338,0.0002407107,0.00026071558,0.00033459233,0.0001989547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720037,0.0017271761,0.0003023474,0.00021780719,0.0004907176,0.00006157853],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005844755,0.00014691605,0.00024079983,0.00016272978,0.0048273294,0.00021125434,0.0004914415,0.00013468655,0.00017959779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005424119,0.00011794461,0.000054063265,0.0007308751,0.00017551123,0.0007633296,0.00005389484,0.00028846535,0.000003251673],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012590873,0.00008755153,0.003048977,0.00016953103,0.000041468487,0.000001860245,0.9173284,0.00007600331,0.000008818566,0.06790789,0.011088262,0.000115336086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056267774,0.000040329032,0.042551838,0.0003248939,0.00015369977,9.0506035e-7,0.55519116,0.000042869775,0.000062601146,0.0019403507,0.39889556,0.00023307922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08080026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80583715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7250369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011875266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033761503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99646825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380630757","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.208","title":"An Analysis of Criminology as a Profession in the Republic of South Africa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Criminology; Restructuring; Constructive; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.16195726561794696,"score_gpt":0.45314258911747857,"score_spread":0.29118532349953163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380630757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634341,0.00017633785,0.000067338355,0.033583578,0.000665757,0.000051346942,0.000008659059,0.0000026500506,0.0020102635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985239,0.00005826625,0.000120758385,0.0011161204,0.00008174705,0.000007947691,0.000009830322,0.00000215122,0.00007929699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724126,0.001738459,0.00051082973,0.00009798241,0.000288266,0.00012320065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976483,0.0008379146,0.00081284356,0.00009985244,0.0005751588,0.000025914042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022438727,0.000050904087,0.000235808,0.00081411377,0.00019310872,0.000010793741,0.0005872825,0.00011361101,0.0006884492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012792059,0.00004024243,0.000083769664,0.0001323075,0.0007013809,0.00022054894,0.0000531706,0.0005661608,5.5884243e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014019223,0.0002735371,0.015350127,0.0000016045819,0.0002857175,0.000011075925,0.32933506,0.00007650478,0.00021237326,0.65284765,0.00019766823,0.0012685248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093616155,0.0010330984,0.30350164,0.0000068014697,0.00059990893,0.00010774193,0.41867837,0.000116951174,0.000055834804,0.23888886,0.03594223,0.00013241843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060190464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048434686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41395876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060892336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067740504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7538036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380924600","doi":"","title":"Misogyny in Health Professions? An Analysis of the Dalhousie Dentistry Scandal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Dentistry; Health professions; Political science; Medicine; Health care; Law","score_opus":0.4985459042945467,"score_gpt":0.6686955071452225,"score_spread":0.17014960285067582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380924600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97073424,0.0016584033,0.000069480535,0.013227843,0.0012752559,0.000426709,0.000033128224,0.000014681174,0.012560286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99661165,0.00068804994,0.00013990082,0.0008663393,0.00010821165,0.000018136678,0.000010351516,0.0000109971415,0.0015463876],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962037,0.0015726569,0.00085405854,0.00022590571,0.00087036943,0.00027330965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969624,0.00034812305,0.0013453072,0.0004126708,0.0006351631,0.00029632341],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057315067,0.000116600546,0.00045312653,0.0008642926,0.00054111483,0.0007545495,0.0020922623,0.00008935574,0.004927674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022525562,0.00009186328,0.000116704825,0.0058733406,0.00024599148,0.0031324606,0.0002815637,0.00049105135,0.000004264505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042420943,0.00047580377,0.95726913,0.00001786708,0.00014246527,0.0000018409644,0.012699743,0.00023103399,0.00048153795,0.0020806193,0.023309596,0.003247964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002280563,0.0000046521855,0.94076747,0.00010810971,0.000092587456,0.0000010159039,0.0081875725,0.00006592645,0.00021468785,0.0024830347,0.047719553,0.00012733878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072205536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03262931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039576225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023022645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034579185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99598193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380926266","doi":"10.3138/ctr.103.012","title":"Legal Advocate’s Report on the Findings of The Squeegee Project, 9 June 1999","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03820559548963203,"score_gpt":0.34599141082112744,"score_spread":0.3077858153314954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380926266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00177602,0.00469139,8.69485e-8,0.36729935,0.00032402063,0.0006358348,0.000010983226,0.000010475304,0.6252518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69774485,0.0384497,0.00004657428,0.07152451,0.0006298946,0.00017918657,0.000027203398,0.00003505696,0.19136304],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987772,0.0003310025,0.00028387483,0.00013871765,0.00024399802,0.00022519096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990534,0.00016897572,0.000117170195,0.00045493632,0.000100200035,0.000105292536],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014491027,0.00008142064,0.00013686354,0.00004750749,0.0005881243,0.00006841623,0.00040110154,0.00004573446,0.004768671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006813795,0.000046201385,0.00009696901,0.0011368862,0.00018522373,0.00017258979,0.0000060223197,0.00028465808,0.000219114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015297784,0.000025446843,0.00042539393,0.000092448085,0.000019401892,0.00000889395,0.0019319968,4.5257352e-7,0.000001024427,0.18013987,0.7565846,0.060768984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017581733,0.0000048612083,0.0003706645,0.0004903215,0.000028502103,0.000015896501,0.00027160428,1.948821e-7,0.000006063066,0.00016921182,0.9985644,0.000060688963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48994353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43795088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6959688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018923702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005564238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381191545","doi":"10.4324/9781003015093","title":"Leading Works in Legal Ethics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.18045518468395552,"score_gpt":0.4753994365089715,"score_spread":0.29494425182501594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381191545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000037280226,0.000036000925,0.000045249286,0.11071176,0.0017112556,0.00012040351,0.0000016014878,0.00013464736,0.88723534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005525295,0.0002912301,0.00015671435,0.0031125918,0.0008347296,0.00001357995,0.000034437322,0.000019926221,0.99498427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988312,0.0001650049,0.00022559444,0.0001724855,0.00039865045,0.00020705258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779594,0.0017528996,0.00010906245,0.00012702869,0.00016157082,0.000053505853],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022474865,0.00008654599,0.00012597797,0.0002752133,0.0003488016,0.0004335386,0.00021284635,0.0006520066,0.0023434232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033497144,0.00009387784,0.000039714,0.0006198604,0.00013372516,0.0006077361,0.000026441536,0.0028765302,0.0026930543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.2610104e-7,0.0000061026826,0.000009510064,0.0000051996594,0.0000036419399,0.0000026924663,0.010170839,0.0000017388784,1.13473305e-7,0.64191055,0.34627154,0.001617432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031321284,0.0000022566478,0.000017293114,0.00010540773,0.000004704816,1.3780182e-7,0.0041120946,0.0000021442834,1.8708755e-7,0.021609517,0.97399974,0.00011518764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067814076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08742821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6277282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043290187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009035956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382244745","doi":"10.1515/9781553395065-014","title":"Key and Emerging Issues in Canadian Higher Education Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Political science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.025117646329770996,"score_gpt":0.2877299246671509,"score_spread":0.26261227833737993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382244745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000083032155,0.0000070880737,4.3784198e-7,0.026594285,0.000631555,0.0002629934,0.00008992881,0.000050345567,0.97235507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0147459805,0.0002339346,0.00007158068,0.0009972325,0.0002368985,0.0000018519888,0.000017313685,0.000021152311,0.98367405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989008,0.000101829166,0.00015536943,0.0003141445,0.00021710398,0.00031078063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989982,0.00009644192,0.00016042673,0.00021722888,0.00023478846,0.0002928721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023181694,0.0001786331,0.00017674422,0.00037818233,0.00086594484,0.00010012551,0.00023596018,0.0003236756,0.000578723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003160741,0.00020376896,0.000041759544,0.000031168373,0.00026451747,0.00049639185,0.000060237915,0.00039163462,0.000028121067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063947805,0.0000076037145,0.000019505953,0.000011500818,0.000020273766,0.000008265367,0.0016311929,1.2099612e-7,6.587659e-7,0.9890483,0.0074851885,0.0017609654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012130746,0.00000661805,0.00004907967,0.000109374894,0.000033030825,2.5853106e-7,0.0004692125,1.10449534e-7,0.0000041598314,0.006938405,0.99201554,0.00025292658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86921614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06349054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9845303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078134926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011441322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9535983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382245004","doi":"10.1515/9781553395065-001","title":"Introduction/Preface","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.026848925313467855,"score_gpt":0.2695088301637196,"score_spread":0.24265990485025177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382245004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.082534e-7,9.449994e-7,0.000057583955,0.03190643,0.001295482,0.00034213962,0.00020176252,0.00024438114,0.9659505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00043547282,0.0001823751,0.00017722491,0.00035771186,0.0014809191,0.0000015036437,0.00002258927,0.00003485367,0.99730736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983391,0.00014671813,0.00021470382,0.00050085085,0.00047647394,0.00032215376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981774,0.00020172096,0.00036501765,0.000497319,0.00055674795,0.00020179142],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031584536,0.00025995262,0.00024931823,0.00025687428,0.0014411598,0.00010425723,0.00049334683,0.00045198968,0.0019987896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001498188,0.00027763293,0.0001424098,0.00003286132,0.0004469404,0.0005724873,0.00015563637,0.00068568107,0.00032018154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025028992,0.00001197271,5.203647e-7,0.000009819288,0.00007348327,0.000009473709,0.0006146441,5.75822e-7,0.000003818161,0.89553195,0.101605885,0.0021128382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020556465,0.000016596194,0.000002025552,0.000038912913,0.000099714074,7.570274e-7,0.00034308856,1.276804e-7,0.000043291722,0.0033244856,0.9955754,0.00034999542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031620425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001021608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89396954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060322194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047927978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382245666","doi":"10.4324/9781003312994-11","title":"Canadian Challenges and Initiatives in Teaching Family Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.1445837400648108,"score_gpt":0.38129338181135436,"score_spread":0.23670964174654355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382245666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013804087,0.00048075325,3.2382158e-7,0.07766405,0.0002876566,0.00010972566,0.000008716385,0.00004501625,0.92138994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049726237,0.006187117,0.000119010125,0.0035686,0.00025883905,0.000009692367,0.000016013899,0.000021600406,0.9400929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999342,0.000062734136,0.00013721133,0.00016180889,0.00013763961,0.00015858847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932855,0.0003624797,0.000057109326,0.00007779082,0.000056051394,0.000118039556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007171979,0.000087250344,0.00010591668,0.00026681813,0.0003554436,0.0001232484,0.00008773274,0.00018920444,0.00034184256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025965803,0.0000924491,0.000015353235,0.00003384832,0.00011901115,0.00048444126,0.000014696497,0.000598972,0.00017601578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.9126102e-7,0.0000022142438,0.000005461317,0.000003941146,0.0000066739153,0.0000034321706,0.027484167,3.940811e-8,9.3334464e-8,0.96231735,0.0014265891,0.008749754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025696529,0.0000041706267,0.0005537611,0.0000350159,0.0000034370044,1.682349e-7,0.012868873,3.3724456e-7,3.0920997e-8,0.10806236,0.87834185,0.00010429597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7583423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8769153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017335014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012313019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37699652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382459203","doi":"10.1515/9781553394457-002","title":"A Note to Students","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.056846457330234544,"score_gpt":0.3369586686259485,"score_spread":0.28011221129571395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382459203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000042575493,7.0643705e-7,0.000042351123,0.0053425767,0.0007323726,0.0005857718,0.0002079217,0.00017172073,0.9929123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015136956,0.000025652549,0.0003272998,0.00090325234,0.00025622678,0.0000020540224,0.000024920177,0.000032572334,0.9969143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797535,0.0001328988,0.00020153215,0.00042236672,0.00094893534,0.00031889128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979838,0.00014082529,0.0002503851,0.0004193903,0.00077556574,0.00042999446],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048406134,0.00024990132,0.00026775626,0.00030758278,0.0009467498,0.00016733383,0.0008564334,0.00039766612,0.00031000414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017634101,0.0003088424,0.000108642496,0.000048453283,0.00017689835,0.0003387512,0.0003410953,0.00067856826,0.00028613824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038695944,0.00002457098,0.0000029030175,0.000007704166,0.000058258356,0.000029310022,0.0032550925,0.0000026768612,6.466329e-7,0.9132902,0.08204856,0.001241365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002567223,0.000034203957,0.000007264977,0.00005377207,0.000104810126,3.2968987e-7,0.00061820605,2.2432626e-7,0.0000055740275,0.0014105897,0.9971583,0.00035000066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014214161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050169372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91510975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082596124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066476874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382681798","doi":"10.1515/9780773556188-007","title":"The Tree of Knowledge, the Axe of Power: Le Dain and the Transformation of Canadian Legal Education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Tree (set theory); Political science; Transformation (genetics); Law; Biology; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.016682722161522844,"score_gpt":0.25015279304815835,"score_spread":0.23347007088663552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382681798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000629184,0.000016654216,0.0000067409837,0.014018771,0.00029736728,0.00062806456,0.00012040027,0.0000073226397,0.98484176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27500096,0.00033772134,0.000014356255,0.00008734968,0.00003092796,0.0000016084058,0.000012505182,0.000009036863,0.72450554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897975,0.00026768935,0.0002627746,0.00012033636,0.00023756713,0.00013186753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979777,0.00060273433,0.00047709272,0.0003114065,0.00057141867,0.000059673344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081276963,0.00011662234,0.00019333605,0.0002421332,0.0009654187,0.000038666698,0.0004550185,0.00016050282,0.000022617198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097813565,0.00007956035,0.000101189486,0.000078204095,0.0009776092,0.0002697613,0.000037830432,0.00033025735,0.0000016054157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045922774,0.000013271134,0.0000015643852,0.0000251808,0.000064063686,7.845783e-8,0.011798499,0.0000013130336,0.0000022350823,0.98166156,0.0026783478,0.0037079589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028210823,0.000017455328,0.000050854986,0.00004759863,0.00010282081,2.9849377e-7,0.009474651,0.0000030820493,0.000072459225,0.0015509055,0.9883158,0.00008193547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44358116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024625478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011222868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028646237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382863516","doi":"10.1515/9780773557574","title":"Connecting the Dots","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.034233244704630114,"score_gpt":0.2872913093449592,"score_spread":0.2530580646403291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382863516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006425498,7.882178e-7,0.000020540872,0.006894093,0.001120223,0.0005682772,0.000117758565,0.00017000728,0.99110186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017523165,0.00007362471,0.00007102877,0.00070637267,0.00036894792,0.0000014644256,0.000036200836,0.000027751123,0.9969623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823344,0.00041475496,0.00018471615,0.0003573856,0.00047339688,0.00033631752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997661,0.0009106807,0.0004204211,0.00048471848,0.0004101321,0.00011304882],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057345896,0.00021481024,0.00022835443,0.00014765492,0.0024262597,0.00020373259,0.00078402564,0.00038520098,0.00027261392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028069707,0.00020563859,0.00014394724,0.00006945444,0.000229861,0.00038381462,0.00021320207,0.0011215654,0.00013605105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013618549,0.00001216875,0.0000014525914,0.000018580104,0.00007108341,0.0000083669465,0.0037021856,0.0000055937676,6.606195e-7,0.89747673,0.09706151,0.001628047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001817216,0.000013039148,0.0000037573702,0.00004939443,0.000111373054,6.634036e-7,0.0036152217,0.0000021058381,0.000010771184,0.00048137762,0.99526757,0.00026297756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013771105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003316641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8982061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006244721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011906885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383427395","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_121-1","title":"Framework of Considerations for Academic Integrity in Quality Assurance in Canadian Higher Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Academic integrity; Quality (philosophy); Higher education; Political science; Jurisdiction; Curriculum; Engineering management; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Business; Engineering; Operations management; Law; External quality assessment","score_opus":0.24590412210266446,"score_gpt":0.4924771975916611,"score_spread":0.24657307548899662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383427395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019352313,0.00007036592,0.00002234707,0.1631553,0.0018186948,0.0006478286,0.00009485763,0.000026935053,0.8339701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28971717,0.00017579521,0.002251883,0.0031035508,0.00036154443,0.00013682648,0.000068724694,0.000020276892,0.7041642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986109,0.00011568113,0.000614017,0.00022298834,0.00020687755,0.00022952007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558103,0.0033902815,0.00028069265,0.00017607455,0.000451427,0.0001205173],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019454263,0.00011163321,0.00022747551,0.00053292036,0.00016065825,0.00005271215,0.0001445386,0.0007677591,0.003019108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007158302,0.00012821786,0.00004981249,0.0003035436,0.00013822081,0.0003171082,0.00000861726,0.0016159709,0.00006276826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002232613,0.000016116928,0.0020664912,0.000022411634,0.0000055613395,1.6432915e-7,0.002992189,0.0000017203836,8.0625426e-7,0.97035104,0.024082804,0.00045844703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035946265,0.0000026756456,0.008367149,0.00011866945,0.0000042849265,6.5441746e-8,0.0007243463,7.6723404e-7,8.5503507e-7,0.54243773,0.448209,0.00009853941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.836559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42791334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065114576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020677868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99789226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383427919","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_129-1","title":"Enabling Ableism: Using Academic Integrity Arguments to Create Disability in Testing Environments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Ableism; Academic integrity; Normative; Misconduct; Cheating; Psychology; Scrutiny; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.28318413150842425,"score_gpt":0.43547314502942003,"score_spread":0.15228901352099578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383427919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0152259,0.000018245322,0.0001581905,0.010746715,0.0009598497,0.00081080646,0.000023374267,0.00014105429,0.97191584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.082080685,0.00012066105,0.0028898164,0.0012945152,0.0005640182,0.00003262461,0.000029984523,0.00005877597,0.91292894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979188,0.00010806064,0.0005755214,0.00048065747,0.0005352355,0.00038175617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998376,0.00087959785,0.00024846298,0.00025471527,0.00006561952,0.0001756074],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021197957,0.00021510397,0.00025151786,0.0002110058,0.00045485314,0.00015070918,0.000322804,0.0004660183,0.0014051326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033969765,0.00022918245,0.00005033955,0.00040439275,0.00020085053,0.00060289644,0.00014546273,0.0021029066,0.0007334422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046943525,0.00031153878,0.08220415,0.00011057629,0.0001400392,0.000020226082,0.031441424,0.00051051605,0.0009894114,0.8298276,0.0035646583,0.05083293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022990527,0.000027046632,0.006379221,0.000565035,0.00006888919,0.0000012577314,0.005005499,0.00017014617,0.000035279507,0.069261216,0.9174079,0.0008486181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024602279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002570106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9138432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012065471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006599246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383454547","doi":"10.1515/9780773559776-010","title":"7 Made in Manitoba: The Society and the Legal Profession Act","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Legal profession","score_opus":0.028549842511209688,"score_gpt":0.2737668877352587,"score_spread":0.24521704522404902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383454547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006527934,0.0000039406186,0.0000039743854,0.02730001,0.00047421883,0.0008965956,0.000041765976,0.0000477909,0.97116643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017308647,0.00033920325,0.000037403184,0.0011563676,0.0001591203,0.0000029094133,0.000010581629,0.000018950886,0.9809668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853885,0.0003425686,0.00018071342,0.00030083553,0.00039163255,0.00024540472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984957,0.00062830216,0.0002981688,0.00035339163,0.00016397153,0.000060468155],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008078807,0.00020127806,0.00022354451,0.00007298492,0.0016103403,0.00015717794,0.0005159536,0.00035736963,0.00006705764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066440574,0.00014145154,0.00016659647,0.000037869857,0.00075363374,0.00039004223,0.00027133306,0.0013077765,0.000017984486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067061126,0.000009740835,0.000013274517,0.000017843053,0.000059456208,0.0000043241967,0.005039045,9.343367e-7,7.834073e-7,0.98425776,0.009677028,0.00085274805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005985448,0.000008528751,0.00007485406,0.00007137822,0.00009207039,6.778146e-7,0.008581456,0.0000048292522,0.0000041018834,0.0014571983,0.9889241,0.00018226911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027676703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023212633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98280054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030951848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050619664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383703463","doi":"","title":"INTRODUCTION: GRADUATE STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Mathematics education; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6594110811179608,"score_gpt":0.6806798440367732,"score_spread":0.02126876291881241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383703463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7571508,0.0037076143,0.00015912608,0.09221765,0.007873806,0.0007066707,0.000012171342,0.00010408185,0.13806808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874736,0.0023632238,0.0003499454,0.0012288488,0.0028012223,0.00003927361,0.000009686001,0.0000237017,0.0057104914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642444,0.0008602298,0.00065132015,0.00032509016,0.0014097771,0.0003291469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643296,0.00029588485,0.00075333874,0.00039505074,0.0016828867,0.00043986802],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068091876,0.00016567855,0.00032683788,0.0005674671,0.00077139615,0.0043502334,0.0022936545,0.00009225144,0.018617846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046097706,0.00016081761,0.000086723456,0.0023693666,0.00023882088,0.009271986,0.00035862534,0.00079639297,0.00021705496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007849563,0.00055959803,0.21111856,0.000011966899,0.00013059181,0.000008147115,0.01127801,0.000052129544,0.0012917183,0.016860062,0.7464746,0.012136081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024654786,0.0000058085984,0.2525292,0.000033791046,0.000040947747,0.000004377131,0.005211482,0.00000106737,0.00086846866,0.017108856,0.7237308,0.00021868883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004150218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040804298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2303228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029644524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014588019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99668336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383960731","doi":"10.59703/ijrr.v5i1.44-51","title":"Participation as an expert in cases involving the production of mental health records in Canadian courts.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Risk and Recovery","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Production (economics); Psychology; Psychiatry; Economics","score_opus":0.038757697316222965,"score_gpt":0.40534492707723574,"score_spread":0.36658722976101277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383960731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93390435,0.00043306997,0.0000020237758,0.062158085,0.003048506,0.00007382509,0.00001045882,0.0000012523003,0.0003684351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961625,0.0026801417,0.000066104854,0.00075050886,0.00023297287,0.000005374556,0.0000065533536,0.000002407271,0.00009343842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881786,0.00043269256,0.00030278863,0.000059022135,0.0002965604,0.00009110428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919826,0.00018806697,0.0003594685,0.00003556297,0.00015876995,0.000059849775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022171254,0.000030733056,0.000063681764,0.00031416374,0.000267633,0.00005009625,0.0001203418,0.000014870973,0.00016159551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013737765,0.000026174312,0.000018559518,0.00020624194,0.000043847554,0.00066440325,0.000012250628,0.0002480016,3.5474633e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048222815,0.0007164706,0.41516525,0.0000044077888,0.00006303382,0.00002873008,0.3328617,0.0020247214,0.00009887186,0.017794672,0.017285049,0.21347488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005672047,0.00042120065,0.21085048,0.00010971357,0.000007896966,0.00014017598,0.16792193,0.00021443314,0.0000667296,0.00889823,0.6106565,0.00014550623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.739362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79228884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59337145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005807117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018525929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32864204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384166303","doi":"10.1515/9780773568075","title":"Chief Justice W.R. Jackett","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030964718099842303,"score_gpt":0.28729802610666433,"score_spread":0.256333308006822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384166303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000030102342,0.00000173422,0.000013754892,0.0042698216,0.00091543084,0.00048679367,0.00033283036,0.0003081591,0.99366844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00025135177,0.00029881927,0.0002136336,0.0012543813,0.00067281356,0.0000026844739,0.0001182183,0.000042121887,0.99714595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976595,0.00040104426,0.0002695923,0.0005336183,0.00064854196,0.00048767394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980068,0.00041247002,0.0003668287,0.0005260816,0.00039558817,0.00029222528],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003614401,0.00032970234,0.0003344869,0.00032639946,0.0023276377,0.00019098967,0.0008101976,0.00064822263,0.0011968197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015910779,0.00041526178,0.00018368594,0.000108638196,0.00046945168,0.00058165466,0.00013906925,0.0012804599,0.00025734055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034883557,0.000035110806,4.5214398e-7,0.000037140097,0.0000652966,0.000032162072,0.0015910264,0.0000031239106,3.1898117e-7,0.70319116,0.2935485,0.0014607983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002864653,0.000022712624,0.000006001093,0.000072325,0.0004234373,9.571296e-7,0.0009766209,0.0000010989688,0.00000861065,0.000990943,0.99674517,0.0004656797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010546153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000145946005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70319664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008479693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018042072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384168780","doi":"10.1515/9780773575776-017","title":"Wise Counsel: Bruce Trigger at McGill University","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; History","score_opus":0.02829537772473538,"score_gpt":0.25704675006667277,"score_spread":0.22875137234193738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384168780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015670375,0.000002680591,0.000017577113,0.0044766767,0.00073013967,0.00059075555,0.0018289791,0.00036899777,0.9919685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018055798,0.00027599867,0.00012058727,0.00044896876,0.00020029926,5.4562577e-7,0.0001419972,0.000055926615,0.9969501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734277,0.00028114632,0.00029695593,0.0007547197,0.0007935888,0.0005308131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728096,0.00040216625,0.0006189914,0.0006128895,0.0007783165,0.0003066859],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039570985,0.00045214113,0.00045297077,0.00044028502,0.0034393934,0.0000656856,0.0008052604,0.0006741221,0.00064754556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006446323,0.00059418223,0.0003011154,0.00009748475,0.0005951349,0.000679766,0.0003005772,0.0009949381,0.00018301784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011067111,0.000039345436,0.000002625901,0.000021906822,0.00010777474,0.0001241625,0.0004185517,0.0000062833424,0.000003225538,0.796198,0.20251416,0.00045330005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006333466,0.00002484696,0.0000127629655,0.00006058415,0.00030603682,0.0000019980698,0.00040194677,0.0000023589698,0.000031088846,0.00061142625,0.99725384,0.00065977644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04045499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040420936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7955866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002657568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000553422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384523593","doi":"10.31338/2544-3135.si.2023-96.5","title":"INDIGENOUS CLASS PROCEEDINGS IN CANADA. AN EXAMINATION OF THE CONVERGENCE OF INDIGENOUS RIGHTS AND CLASS ACTIONS IN THE CANADIAN COMMON LAW SYSTEM","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Iuridica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Oppression; Class action; Law; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Collateral; Politics; Social science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.035685696185926506,"score_gpt":0.3142365295524686,"score_spread":0.2785508333665421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384523593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94752425,0.000024248995,5.0390934e-8,0.004271525,0.00028245393,0.0005431775,0.000028124558,0.000009143745,0.04731701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99966437,0.000016949632,0.000002694562,0.00013830236,0.000032487187,0.000055408345,0.00000551618,0.0000039069555,0.0000803487],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987507,0.00024679874,0.00026581448,0.000119714074,0.0003872278,0.00022977119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923253,0.00022764779,0.00018360603,0.000117983625,0.00017433678,0.000063883526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001295832,0.00006330004,0.00011950744,0.00016278352,0.0009315912,0.000044851648,0.00029765174,0.000060813883,0.00000802132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010882056,0.000046786015,0.000011672764,0.0019801895,0.00021144425,0.00026505638,0.000018103057,0.00026542367,0.0000016754567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043062896,0.00008919362,0.10540029,0.00005835136,0.000018111417,0.0000046812156,0.5361681,0.00001135637,0.000037260877,0.35629034,0.0014661808,0.00045183883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012505996,0.000023095236,0.7859502,0.000037088703,0.0000129160935,0.0000018950259,0.16287309,0.00001905267,0.00008179804,0.0004617713,0.050332423,0.00008165901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99895763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68054986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089675625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077910107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385211926","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2023.10460abstract","title":"Experts without Expertise: Repairing Professional Identity Through the Professional Motive","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Psychology; Professional development; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0840406410767058,"score_gpt":0.4478495527412988,"score_spread":0.363808911664593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385211926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41182232,0.000108910084,0.000063582345,0.348607,0.0015854127,0.0015900561,0.0000030975207,0.00049013214,0.2357295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9264479,0.00023219334,0.00050556794,0.0032723143,0.00036603655,0.00032015608,0.000003592869,0.00001472483,0.068837464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979475,0.00006743805,0.00035727228,0.00029435087,0.0009987553,0.00033466527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992709,0.00013466892,0.00031468013,0.000067006746,0.00015812191,0.00005460059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017249987,0.00011870763,0.00012722689,0.00013930364,0.0012288035,0.00012480965,0.0005695955,0.00011531952,0.0003245684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000498936,0.000088993416,0.00006098094,0.0015495617,0.00030176173,0.0031587312,0.00028667616,0.00038397062,0.00009533026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002033937,0.00008871967,0.0038052443,0.00006484939,0.00005420697,4.3568625e-7,0.07782627,0.0000017742498,0.00016393779,0.63075745,0.28502682,0.002189965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002544287,0.000010510479,0.03466411,0.00018527001,0.00003334441,7.090847e-7,0.154614,0.000047755264,0.00039200945,0.027276058,0.7823478,0.00017401823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018353396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008776083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60348135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009373905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009713265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9451088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385249952","doi":"10.57054/jhea.v9i1-2.1356","title":"JHEA, Volume 9, n°1 &amp; 2, 2011 - Full Issue","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Higher Education in Africa","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Danish International Development Agency; Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid; Carnegie Corporation of New York; Ministère des Affaires Etrangères; United Nations Development Programme; United States Agency for International Development; International Development Research Centre; Canadian International Development Agency; Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa; African Capacity Building Foundation; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete; UNICEF; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation","keywords":"Academic freedom; Higher education; Political science; Feminism; Excellence; Democracy; Gender studies; Politics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.08798061666294507,"score_gpt":0.39135378442527424,"score_spread":0.30337316776232914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385249952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033135206,0.0012248517,0.00009405451,0.083089136,0.010543999,0.00015774675,0.0000016332585,0.000021764576,0.87173164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66293484,0.00010627567,0.008101317,0.0009905676,0.0017749766,0.000010546236,0.0000018188006,0.00001107423,0.32606858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986758,0.00022703274,0.00049449195,0.00009427409,0.00031180814,0.0001965925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844563,0.00010461198,0.0005171306,0.00015059006,0.00063636573,0.00014566602],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010371675,0.00007471342,0.0001280394,0.00036563046,0.0001704651,0.000086027816,0.0002905088,0.00008691532,0.046107166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028777387,0.000071871465,0.000055174078,0.0005703175,0.00009357344,0.0010648046,0.000010940786,0.00039620037,0.001296768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032079683,0.0008693583,0.01420663,0.000004832795,0.000013770865,9.581672e-7,0.060486734,8.2994796e-7,0.000051523435,0.03752007,0.88373536,0.0030778279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010294548,0.00003089186,0.04422423,0.000013729859,0.000013119909,0.0000052955434,0.0045463154,1.3474414e-7,0.0000057735087,0.006157136,0.94481915,0.000081260376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019891686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026668605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6297996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020948506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030123228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385360758","doi":"10.59962/9780774866675-004","title":"Inquiries in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.032623502493111085,"score_gpt":0.23388784273457197,"score_spread":0.2012643402414609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385360758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060876046,0.00008512125,0.0000019964107,0.000351153,0.0003969706,0.00021332638,0.00033780892,0.000017583476,0.9979873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022771385,0.0002067995,0.000044995886,0.00013338139,0.000039335482,5.7879924e-7,0.000027123382,0.0000096977055,0.9767667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990575,0.00006980157,0.00014596674,0.0001833242,0.0003989023,0.00014454892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929214,0.00012225716,0.00021714071,0.0001383105,0.00016554765,0.00006459777],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018468307,0.000051266896,0.000175538,0.00004173863,0.00040974971,0.000100442645,0.00034035082,0.000095374635,0.007829428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049352533,0.00015171159,0.000041689862,0.00002079156,0.0006192422,0.0001758685,0.00011224186,0.0004674574,0.0000016371092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011013392,0.000023181321,0.00045526406,0.000041915468,0.000058936308,0.00027472616,0.008596606,0.000004464273,2.5636822e-7,0.3426716,0.61611944,0.031742565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000132942,0.0000066257517,0.00027635435,0.00005178039,0.00001936706,0.0000022391914,0.004353692,5.835832e-7,4.4579103e-8,0.0017037061,0.9933092,0.00014347066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99991745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37718973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086026517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008080279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511075","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3634","title":"Law and Technology in Legal Education: A Systemic Approach at Ryerson","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Legal practice; Practice of law; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Legal profession; Engineering","score_opus":0.024208621140504222,"score_gpt":0.3308094938504581,"score_spread":0.3066008727099539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009198976,0.0013936723,0.000042891857,0.06450848,0.00066134706,0.000091083384,0.0000013394239,0.000026933,0.92407525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905172,0.00018057354,0.0019893234,0.0015188112,0.00035936115,0.00001699341,0.000005228499,0.000007905148,0.005404617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988859,0.00024511945,0.00025124513,0.00016994373,0.00022511792,0.00022261801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992051,0.00007342328,0.00014883939,0.00012861998,0.00033218457,0.00011179861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007010738,0.000076274206,0.00012427801,0.00011174375,0.0010901734,0.00040638002,0.00014198164,0.00014071177,0.0002622684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019092055,0.00007859639,0.000024937497,0.0007131055,0.000225297,0.0007432294,0.000038242495,0.0006501018,0.00002910727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003972263,0.00013765549,0.001147589,0.000011073715,0.0000112689,0.000012307435,0.002588019,0.0000021638505,0.00024222232,0.9941301,0.0009086403,0.0008050056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005522771,0.000026128093,0.00024422625,0.00012858672,0.000037311613,0.0037721142,0.06254316,0.000021214659,0.00026912813,0.09647648,0.8356615,0.0002678808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03344239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16944343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98131824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029671256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015569517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.972994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511513","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1420","title":"Seven Out of Nine Legal Experts Agree: Expertise No Longer Matters (in the Same Way) After Vavilov!","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Confusion; Deference; Certainty; Political science; Focus (optics); Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.05062344579733579,"score_gpt":0.3702091998426819,"score_spread":0.3195857540453461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511513","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004725415,0.07498983,0.000046519366,0.73148274,0.002013086,0.0010855708,0.000024295177,0.000046993442,0.18558556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7171331,0.03302685,0.00095563335,0.22102731,0.0008668739,0.0004753131,0.00005918912,0.000038698927,0.02641703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787045,0.0006823361,0.0004683246,0.00022690458,0.00049755943,0.00025440924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987087,0.0002150064,0.00015034435,0.00044235843,0.00041679223,0.00006677304],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012326475,0.00012641071,0.0002781607,0.000028752436,0.00015524102,0.000124117,0.00031889716,0.000061832594,0.009235564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006446162,0.00009528801,0.00012314721,0.0005062598,0.00018154756,0.00067081145,0.000040149043,0.00022210284,0.0003289122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003071115,0.0007012303,0.0008779739,0.001054745,0.000071969655,0.00010008571,0.072743654,7.2939747e-7,0.00046632346,0.09312368,0.8197133,0.011115579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009650851,0.000009817097,0.00025120474,0.00077480456,0.000034511522,0.000004954069,0.00188702,8.9300136e-7,0.00003695618,0.00008891667,0.9966887,0.00012571494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031462165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008325659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7124077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008030902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004217681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99167013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511835","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1379","title":"ACCLE and Bill C-75: Implications for Student Legal Clinics &amp; Communities in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16372624617413442,"score_gpt":0.47797874237364124,"score_spread":0.3142524961995068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38199124,0.00006656109,0.00002636982,0.6073082,0.0001309039,0.000108520086,0.000033252498,0.0000033758567,0.010331543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795143,0.00019281174,0.00015536869,0.01908099,0.00093269604,0.0000032001913,0.0000024891572,0.0000035555129,0.00011460295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993615,0.000115465926,0.00026921314,0.000035449175,0.00010688854,0.00011149178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918735,0.000304153,0.00019161367,0.000029865112,0.00019669246,0.00009033608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043430112,0.00003991042,0.00011784037,0.000036262594,0.00057535665,0.00013786138,0.00010831884,0.000034263292,0.000013950434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025997893,0.00003481732,0.00002417861,0.0001585898,0.000120743076,0.0003445968,0.000019653226,0.00021718038,3.2062738e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015282796,0.00003836323,0.008191669,0.000007686702,0.000018674842,2.1101343e-7,0.09909057,0.0000013937092,0.000007393395,0.88089186,0.009002461,0.0027344364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025811134,0.000021549708,0.023624148,0.0000030853093,0.000010348673,0.0000013264133,0.04203178,0.0000013130802,4.891771e-7,0.004914634,0.92908686,0.000046321926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9301345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95297927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9200844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015141175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031751958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5632661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512565","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1312","title":"Learning, Teaching &amp; Practising Systemic Advocacy in Legal Clinics: A Conversation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Conversation; Windsor; Public relations; Legal education; Political science; Medicine; Systemic therapy; Medical education; Sociology; Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.0518633316414894,"score_gpt":0.45091875470452697,"score_spread":0.39905542306303754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7995789,0.000030877763,0.00012749754,0.06988848,0.00067370204,0.00008700918,5.923506e-7,0.000014872387,0.12959807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909833,0.000051084884,0.00025835293,0.0021991027,0.005435133,7.125543e-7,8.7994556e-7,0.0000058209844,0.0010655917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847823,0.0006581946,0.00039880833,0.00006723399,0.000240018,0.00015751774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987143,0.00025477365,0.00062855426,0.000032645792,0.00030967148,0.000060041068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028056363,0.000054943786,0.00014110479,0.00017219695,0.00092863786,0.00028376558,0.00008368179,0.0000991763,0.00003895114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022852838,0.00005498199,0.000044338576,0.00020558432,0.00023986744,0.0013562355,0.000012493278,0.00072198885,0.000014252808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035094665,0.00005829969,0.0023916655,0.00000924503,0.0000173094,0.0000017339721,0.33775538,9.741963e-7,0.00010055496,0.65115076,0.0010809533,0.007398017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004033666,0.00007326374,0.0018607847,0.000042828466,0.00001596492,0.000029066592,0.051935002,0.0000053546773,0.0000029105631,0.0029695425,0.94258386,0.0000780795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032687183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031608695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94150287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020604988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016673637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9737542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518138","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3044","title":"Why I Don’t Teach Administrative Law (And Perhaps Why I Should?)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Doctrine; Relevance (law); Law; Administrative law; Political science; Plan (archaeology); Legal doctrine; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09071016286316566,"score_gpt":0.39322226997316284,"score_spread":0.3025121071099972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00087386864,0.000115708826,0.0006178399,0.23551938,0.00055387116,0.00008594421,0.000008148993,0.000033208373,0.762192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97426033,0.00018089433,0.0011299632,0.01974715,0.0008664407,0.000008313303,0.0000015718653,0.000013089844,0.003792219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983426,0.00039416176,0.00029222295,0.00018984951,0.00045224302,0.00032891962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986176,0.00040517535,0.00021396946,0.00014109495,0.000317525,0.00030465782],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012479302,0.00012429328,0.0001368022,0.00005026832,0.0023789965,0.00069283944,0.00024424808,0.00012021776,0.0035034565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004532384,0.00008705485,0.000060967304,0.00017487603,0.00058370735,0.0017736276,0.00002718754,0.0005788696,0.00007017894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015157438,0.00008051634,0.00031852772,0.0000022093677,0.000025229394,0.000009083608,0.0051892423,1.4942465e-7,0.00027666675,0.96707875,0.024755517,0.0022489603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031604944,0.00006231821,0.00010213244,0.00003659828,0.00002230635,0.0000858693,0.006804074,7.7035645e-7,0.00018347669,0.07433453,0.91790426,0.00014762569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06534584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30810168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97338647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000135295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004847802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518156","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1189","title":"The E-Team Project: A Teamwork Approach to Clinical Legal Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Notice; Legal education; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Public relations; Passion; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Law; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07516484529182203,"score_gpt":0.4836582694816039,"score_spread":0.40849342418978185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018444614,0.00003186987,0.00017540886,0.2086329,0.0011494156,0.0001661217,8.3030955e-7,0.000010098179,0.77138877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641174,0.000061947074,0.0009071651,0.014713118,0.015920978,0.0000067913506,6.0176336e-7,0.000006138213,0.0042658374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862206,0.000512367,0.00037377543,0.000069145855,0.00026204967,0.00016057692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988494,0.000305185,0.000306301,0.00006157384,0.0003721384,0.000105386585],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030770935,0.000052717078,0.00012283362,0.000069397436,0.001517694,0.00044167132,0.0001868436,0.00008308518,0.0000035183505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00173933,0.000037331196,0.0000730937,0.0003414389,0.00027340525,0.00041549816,0.000017853767,0.00038479155,0.000006595841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014474848,0.00013059044,0.00009538097,0.0000018895607,0.000010898106,1.9985867e-8,0.022134881,1.1813281e-7,0.0000012193418,0.891687,0.06182053,0.024103014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010292121,0.000046805966,0.0012392894,0.0000040234495,0.000011911686,0.0000038993926,0.011937098,0.0000014821601,5.944929e-7,0.009661279,0.97694296,0.000047762845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010465877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006129469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9456728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068894675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032188124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518234","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1207","title":"Sustainable Professionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Public discourse; Sociology; Narrative; Economic Justice; Environmental ethics; Political science; Civil discourse; Space (punctuation); Civil society; Public relations; Law; Discourse analysis; Politics","score_opus":0.0870535766235191,"score_gpt":0.40013027130761586,"score_spread":0.31307669468409677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002680356,0.00013282876,0.00011881778,0.06870605,0.0007174706,0.00008111401,6.070029e-7,0.00003558754,0.9275272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9011268,0.00010483317,0.0009625279,0.0021058482,0.0006399691,0.000005885524,0.000001923274,0.0000070421866,0.09504517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874204,0.00024587306,0.00019177314,0.00008517181,0.0004173117,0.00031780143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989264,0.00012556573,0.00014687417,0.0000916173,0.0005698648,0.00013966144],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010160089,0.00005950109,0.00007309952,0.00005755566,0.0048812455,0.00020424531,0.00020095742,0.00007148022,0.002792271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005047212,0.000053072035,0.00004598299,0.00031680378,0.00020949366,0.0013862037,0.000020582287,0.0006531341,0.0001746387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005363729,0.00007532418,0.00027403995,0.0000018003349,0.000007359848,0.000049142538,0.009462094,0.0000021827161,0.000011414221,0.9549203,0.034911375,0.00027958085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014399804,0.0000099359895,0.0004157447,0.000006965073,0.000004760306,0.00014002727,0.0137785915,0.0000013098719,0.000020684878,0.121638104,0.86376494,0.0000749291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08939286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018226804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89844644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013759203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014984747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518247","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3148","title":"The Wellness Doctrines for Law Students &amp; Young Lawyers, by Jerome Doraisamy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Mental health law; Commission; Mental illness; Psychology; Subject (documents); Law; Population; Addiction; Sociology; Criminology; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.05786228101600488,"score_gpt":0.4381310824051654,"score_spread":0.3802688013891605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048331744,0.00026182758,0.00037019784,0.11762729,0.004743542,0.00035387315,0.000027864524,0.000038647693,0.87174356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751102,0.00021816751,0.00036434457,0.00094140205,0.0012349286,0.000033401142,0.000008431972,0.000015392452,0.022073768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825174,0.00020700862,0.00032114986,0.00016341696,0.00064353936,0.00041313906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980155,0.00046312725,0.000544315,0.0003806571,0.00040734495,0.00018902007],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027437625,0.00012143439,0.00013461875,0.000021966598,0.017551627,0.0057265693,0.0013473807,0.00009425941,0.0002495984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008731902,0.000090368754,0.000099941084,0.000085331056,0.0005515389,0.001743479,0.000066983026,0.0005315147,0.00009340044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024248644,0.00010077444,0.0013138733,0.0000028343072,0.00004824263,0.0000011410616,0.0021007112,8.117115e-7,0.00005473861,0.95081675,0.044097207,0.0014386881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042223523,0.000016727854,0.0004745669,0.000014024693,0.00002767154,0.000014815004,0.0019052341,9.172128e-7,0.00006345557,0.060572926,0.9363561,0.00013128815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12737513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5145669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.970277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101645135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024320513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385524317","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1309","title":"Without Harry","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.029278452808887016,"score_gpt":0.3582747788596724,"score_spread":0.3289963260507854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385524317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015740045,0.00008048159,0.00044286286,0.044541854,0.0008703814,0.00004594483,0.00000132777,0.00003993048,0.9524032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98027813,0.000024390643,0.002249807,0.0013444492,0.0017961479,0.0000026752612,0.0000026075509,0.0000077844925,0.014294005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990109,0.00015892586,0.0002014522,0.00008145489,0.00032677376,0.00022046741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993476,0.000076670694,0.00015355404,0.000085801694,0.00023387728,0.00010244095],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008390958,0.000058282832,0.00006974719,0.00004593978,0.0016662893,0.0005785097,0.00016997043,0.00005941101,0.0023177995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014981208,0.000054407083,0.000045622688,0.00021438973,0.00013621428,0.00094442785,0.000008817341,0.00049550296,0.00027317222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000339545,0.000059151727,0.0018158699,7.320635e-7,0.0000055612027,0.000003818973,0.0007812771,0.000007337446,0.00007132219,0.97135866,0.025072927,0.00081993575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001406233,0.000007904456,0.0012204738,0.0000069970038,0.000009541261,0.000032949316,0.0010832761,0.000004037206,0.000048689748,0.13997795,0.8573875,0.00008006838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18272695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2905662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97870415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008741272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043811122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385533046","doi":"10.1515/9780773548916-015","title":"The State of Legal Scholarship and Graduate Legal Education in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal education; State (computer science); Political science; Graduate education; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.03884186204485448,"score_gpt":0.2882838910222357,"score_spread":0.24944202897738124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385533046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00071618805,0.000005163908,9.645414e-7,0.004771278,0.0006025884,0.00034038804,0.00012667083,0.000015143487,0.9934216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0983589,0.00033899717,0.000030323512,0.00014109768,0.00005642093,0.0000013067533,0.000011896595,0.000014003739,0.90104705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986749,0.00017103997,0.00022598362,0.00025398252,0.000441822,0.00023224029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982505,0.00026490763,0.00053273997,0.0003705567,0.0004541317,0.00012718885],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005026592,0.00016910284,0.00019931469,0.00013848476,0.0014939306,0.00020731142,0.0005022965,0.00011154302,0.000012281437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021156209,0.00017307726,0.00004489086,0.00001738312,0.0003863994,0.00067051454,0.00012164203,0.0008087295,0.0000015263867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034620996,0.000009317694,0.000031328833,0.000017144423,0.000034301025,0.000011445508,0.00059264386,0.0000015337615,6.6135146e-7,0.98073673,0.002549782,0.015980473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014335845,0.000008892924,0.0005039905,0.000079051446,0.000038332717,6.7826574e-7,0.00091330044,8.473707e-7,0.000020880543,0.0027892143,0.9953207,0.00018077757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97804874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58813906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007802842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009442971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385533651","doi":"10.1515/9780773586833","title":"Rethinking Professionalism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.06771102656340179,"score_gpt":0.319979836379472,"score_spread":0.25226880981607025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385533651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000028854056,0.0000030838173,0.000015655816,0.0075608334,0.0016620398,0.00049873086,0.0001371045,0.00026047596,0.98985916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011939385,0.00006249567,0.00033868247,0.0008979378,0.00061030505,0.0000033578478,0.00010900068,0.000037209415,0.9967471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976327,0.0005491991,0.0002388542,0.00037878146,0.0007272986,0.0004731698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801207,0.0004422339,0.00049200974,0.00041823945,0.00041964548,0.00021581183],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007544636,0.00026692043,0.00027898772,0.0002567223,0.0023720276,0.00011335964,0.0006507578,0.0007518329,0.0004863667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018037061,0.00031008347,0.00014989113,0.000072968774,0.00035649567,0.0007449087,0.00025828325,0.0015226207,0.00009014638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016844368,0.000029895291,0.0000026366229,0.00003174914,0.000058240545,0.000012399309,0.008082127,3.1156554e-7,6.908855e-7,0.86720055,0.123846196,0.00071836764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018177148,0.000007914053,0.000009132041,0.00013819091,0.00013477601,5.73202e-7,0.00080293894,3.168377e-7,0.000011465199,0.007777596,0.9905693,0.0003660091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081486935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009078847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8667231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009647575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017721959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385586256","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-31278-6_8","title":"Professionalism in Everyday Work: Women Lawyers’ Strategies to Exercise Control over Their Work in Finland, French Canada, and Poland","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Disadvantaged; Work (physics); Legal profession; Control (management); Public relations; Professional development; Political science; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.038542359201762355,"score_gpt":0.3183333260823779,"score_spread":0.27979096688061555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385586256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0410004,0.00031118526,0.000006493044,0.046961013,0.0017451888,0.0014262949,0.00012936656,0.000057078498,0.908363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37633896,0.000085858665,0.000019120364,0.0014799468,0.00009926734,0.000092372415,0.000017872884,0.000017492834,0.6218491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984985,0.00008555099,0.00034855082,0.00030053587,0.00038483774,0.00038201644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987404,0.00072352204,0.00012833858,0.00016207923,0.00010475966,0.00014094701],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084875675,0.00020258017,0.00031398353,0.00028269982,0.00019082609,0.00022997383,0.00018767593,0.00027102738,0.0026726846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001600141,0.00017139537,0.000021948761,0.00045858507,0.000080331214,0.00033823604,0.000044210785,0.00062883255,0.000050755458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028178806,0.000093884686,0.05931848,0.00005699442,0.0000942345,0.000060097616,0.18936665,0.00004298904,0.0000016579507,0.4520665,0.2896678,0.008948924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046832135,0.000009073493,0.14861816,0.00040935536,0.0000075603325,1.8755513e-7,0.014859539,8.2834583e-7,1.16526444e-7,0.017770525,0.8174939,0.00036242092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7410994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9691322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52782613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045119907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004631203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385591175","doi":"10.59962/9780774861892-005","title":"Alberta: Plain, Old-Fashioned, Unfrilled Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.032200660299788894,"score_gpt":0.24673182414817774,"score_spread":0.21453116384838883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385591175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009223695,0.00007044022,0.000028088802,0.0013988096,0.0005884905,0.0004558461,0.0002661476,0.000087748056,0.9970122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055968664,0.000329211,0.00033420153,0.0005227365,0.00028542877,6.598665e-7,0.00005736015,0.000026881647,0.99284667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985339,0.000101936675,0.00024808798,0.000398611,0.0004955932,0.00022184219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980871,0.00039153593,0.0004544669,0.0002496119,0.00059360825,0.00022364904],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002208247,0.00012019439,0.00034406915,0.00005040853,0.0008819022,0.0003560058,0.00054481707,0.00041505264,0.0029970363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030507977,0.00030758962,0.00016018063,0.00003364709,0.00059508835,0.0003008531,0.00014473461,0.0006336673,0.000077736426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029604478,0.00003914322,0.000010482028,0.00012176957,0.0001791594,0.00010606875,0.009495862,0.0000012351059,0.0000022192805,0.317424,0.6633431,0.0092473775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039474425,0.000028020411,0.000039744697,0.00017449608,0.00036732983,0.000006396571,0.0027205641,0.000003943663,2.835387e-7,0.0018668338,0.9940966,0.00030104854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73627126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8059497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3307535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014872219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009766824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385592032","doi":"10.59962/9780774861120","title":"Seeking the Court’s Advice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Law; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.025893800936656552,"score_gpt":0.25258759916188706,"score_spread":0.2266937982252305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385592032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000081572085,0.000111078276,0.000021584012,0.0008460135,0.00064226,0.00045679047,0.00017783711,0.00007936919,0.9975835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021810594,0.0001528893,0.000114772345,0.000306467,0.00020562123,5.548698e-7,0.000027322452,0.000014263128,0.99699706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987727,0.00019269809,0.00014973016,0.00022915208,0.00045911176,0.00019661931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983392,0.00036923456,0.00039944466,0.00029227746,0.00053454604,0.00006533876],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004985875,0.00006804945,0.00019600132,0.000029883093,0.000841496,0.0004320722,0.00069671334,0.00026793685,0.0010568098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010217668,0.0001428657,0.000108926135,0.00003528559,0.00065957196,0.00024093449,0.00012106207,0.00061356596,0.00003830294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035450064,0.000016792208,0.00002380255,0.000035164067,0.000057377223,0.000010718941,0.0063330275,8.586166e-7,4.9717534e-7,0.009116311,0.9764417,0.007960218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000165314,0.000010544849,0.00017223679,0.00017281015,0.000095879535,0.000004028109,0.0031483793,0.000007774,5.981115e-8,0.00076485804,0.99530095,0.00015719584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7088212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70312333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018859232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002036869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027114581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385594888","doi":"10.59962/9780774834902-010","title":"Shifting Terrains: A Picture of the Institutionalization of Equity in Canadian Universities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Equity (law); Terrain; Political science; Regional science; Sociology; Geography; Cartography; Law","score_opus":0.0485512270259994,"score_gpt":0.2925112259701792,"score_spread":0.2439599989441798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385594888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035840967,0.000051199302,0.000006337344,0.00022652515,0.00019938347,0.00025235282,0.0004703029,0.0000066838857,0.99520314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49618354,0.000048489124,0.000038877875,0.000027351463,0.000022718632,1.01518616e-7,0.000014699313,0.000003919669,0.5036603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992226,0.00006298935,0.0001618139,0.00012887875,0.0002925624,0.00013120839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867713,0.00005383821,0.0005568541,0.00020578543,0.00044384968,0.00006253564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031200642,0.000051995485,0.00017757472,0.00008675872,0.0005739057,0.00007381463,0.00056333985,0.00023359506,0.00030824204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012590871,0.00010265907,0.00007794309,0.000020128855,0.001167784,0.0002574375,0.00013211371,0.00026059328,3.2155674e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013178411,0.000037700924,0.0019475147,0.000225778,0.00010992118,0.000023814517,0.043032967,0.000028834565,0.000005247374,0.930197,0.012797482,0.011580585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021917964,0.000008750513,0.006369326,0.0007629122,0.00005486579,0.000001401925,0.0045756754,0.0000046482437,0.0000012446105,0.0035726754,0.9843087,0.00012061396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97151124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040880954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006005471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598363","doi":"10.59962/9780774863599-007","title":"Measuring Justice System Performance in Quebec and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.035033551832537146,"score_gpt":0.2072824535005228,"score_spread":0.17224890166798565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040419456,0.00008463807,0.0000028569254,0.00022644126,0.00023918741,0.00021899914,0.00008924408,0.0000278689,0.99506885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24627487,0.000107156564,0.00005223748,0.000054712196,0.000057559544,2.7466925e-7,0.000005469955,0.00000776136,0.75343996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920154,0.000045988927,0.00014035014,0.00019462674,0.00029866217,0.00011885042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933594,0.000080889455,0.00018765454,0.00009002851,0.0002086094,0.000096850046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015597123,0.00005713816,0.00018244243,0.000027183938,0.00034914108,0.00016574898,0.00019827575,0.00012850153,0.00006940043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045051045,0.00014800619,0.000021663904,0.000013793269,0.0001926813,0.00019872282,0.00006352059,0.0003374872,0.0000012043706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001136524,0.00006779004,0.0028583545,0.0071462686,0.00040298054,0.0013539374,0.04844901,0.000029413153,0.000006533267,0.44621918,0.33244997,0.1609029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017684023,0.000006539045,0.0012905693,0.000519486,0.00009404088,0.0000044849276,0.0054352824,0.000015279822,2.0643398e-7,0.00002232102,0.9922749,0.00016008317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99983335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6598249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004425109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026299388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60355175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598393","doi":"10.59962/9780774863599-014","title":"Court-Ordered Family Legal Information Sessions in Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.03549427290238069,"score_gpt":0.23844958392021842,"score_spread":0.20295531101783773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00069432205,0.000019241485,0.00003561195,0.0007402198,0.00031530013,0.00041504862,0.0002017646,0.000055706598,0.9975228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026799496,0.0000747589,0.00037377104,0.00036752727,0.00004465579,8.279893e-7,0.00011663229,0.000009885561,0.97221243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892235,0.00005866865,0.00026878217,0.00018350247,0.00040564124,0.00016108295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887335,0.00008195945,0.00036971245,0.00014932014,0.0004039255,0.00012174325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019269744,0.000084174855,0.00024210809,0.000080263555,0.0004005575,0.00043939654,0.0003388414,0.00031237325,0.0012881651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007528369,0.00021129161,0.000086364795,0.000029404164,0.00030281502,0.0010474575,0.00009837092,0.00081023655,0.000027107973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049727532,0.000074116615,0.00031439046,0.00007325536,0.00011716773,0.000119255084,0.030905228,0.000005849089,0.0000031262653,0.2874255,0.6509624,0.029949946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037038128,0.00001893631,0.0018511433,0.00018822597,0.000042133564,0.000002328659,0.0036400242,0.000004395349,7.970211e-8,0.0012182428,0.9924639,0.00020021028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99057704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99710125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34150144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052807917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033290295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598830","doi":"10.59962/9780774861076-009","title":"The Ontario Court of Appeal Decision","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027651252185599152,"score_gpt":0.24680505262696834,"score_spread":0.21915380044136917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012378825,0.000083185805,0.000028745631,0.00017765332,0.0005197897,0.00035481254,0.00010572554,0.000017403325,0.9974748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010207076,0.00022735876,0.0002352268,0.000031705782,0.000047740938,1.5563542e-7,0.000010042274,0.00000935413,0.98923135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895316,0.000047911242,0.00020112029,0.00018120468,0.00047896733,0.00013763616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821514,0.00040157195,0.00045605755,0.0002641157,0.00060304103,0.000060054474],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042043653,0.00006026975,0.00020328602,0.000028263075,0.0005840141,0.00019244822,0.000510349,0.00023592445,0.0011147502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067005734,0.00011670416,0.000119119526,0.000012376738,0.0006556093,0.00014715828,0.00010699394,0.00041523596,0.000014833384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006841372,0.000054346383,0.00032489916,0.000043205197,0.00020153345,0.000020132842,0.014418254,0.0000021338594,0.0000019991833,0.22767407,0.5996139,0.15757711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020488213,0.000023854931,0.00077709876,0.00018645193,0.00006093675,0.0000020991836,0.0008981647,8.471322e-7,2.6600011e-7,0.00375425,0.99397814,0.00011300902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94549334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39436424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018822603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020674753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599910","doi":"10.59962/9780774833110-007","title":"Common Law Legal Education in the Dominion of Canada’s Moral Project","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Law; Moral education; Legal education; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.030166965977069138,"score_gpt":0.265105086298473,"score_spread":0.23493812032140388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013870547,0.00004785502,0.0000011686194,0.00089235045,0.00032312158,0.00050731114,0.00023726157,0.0000092776745,0.9965946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14581253,0.00004741458,0.00004722659,0.00017995453,0.00008279031,9.846837e-7,0.00001887081,0.000007357109,0.85380286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895096,0.00015251641,0.00020052056,0.00015898612,0.0004021035,0.00013488968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988913,0.00017300755,0.0003746645,0.0001960248,0.00032934544,0.000035636866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003987733,0.00006154217,0.00018985565,0.000042085343,0.00031146678,0.000110235786,0.00042429927,0.00015623744,0.00019372594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033099994,0.00010383099,0.000054957316,0.000019613039,0.00049230317,0.00023028546,0.00004273101,0.00028299668,6.4284654e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015616437,0.000049679536,0.00006149585,0.00003608924,0.000022921316,0.000011260603,0.0037948792,1.15934434e-7,0.0000011626785,0.71757865,0.25684917,0.021578936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019037657,0.000016306547,0.00045112462,0.00024574538,0.00003069415,0.0000044329113,0.0029307278,2.666123e-7,7.1442514e-7,0.004036463,0.99197876,0.00011438521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99865216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7351296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023029339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01021255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99539864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599962","doi":"10.59962/9780774833110-001","title":"Foreword","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03502917364281081,"score_gpt":0.25243146816263545,"score_spread":0.21740229451982465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006974227,0.00006419703,0.00005760662,0.0004362304,0.00034958572,0.0002558571,0.00053752353,0.00006766413,0.9981616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003537174,0.00023041395,0.00021305833,0.000090699716,0.00016782935,3.0938318e-7,0.000009516261,0.000015013738,0.995736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991118,0.00004391644,0.00013975303,0.00021916453,0.00032016533,0.00016521661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882495,0.00013448349,0.00029435873,0.00019944934,0.00044354805,0.00010321047],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002082842,0.00006360238,0.00018514943,0.000039262584,0.00045944154,0.00014147008,0.00036649537,0.00029424534,0.004233149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006128052,0.00014867132,0.00010975139,0.000009576522,0.00065177056,0.00022990584,0.00007824114,0.0002785319,0.00003957514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007174726,0.000015177843,0.000015662563,0.000022104196,0.00006975564,0.00003169976,0.0018664881,2.6681162e-8,0.0000011671818,0.44272953,0.4336834,0.12155782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018679071,0.000013082575,0.000066997825,0.00021074028,0.000053303607,0.0000028556356,0.00032252164,2.1258103e-7,2.2508009e-7,0.01149978,0.9874728,0.00017071077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39315274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63869107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5537894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011177838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007451442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385600957","doi":"10.59962/9780774831000","title":"In Search of the Ethical Lawyer","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.038265278247526534,"score_gpt":0.2927296270317376,"score_spread":0.2544643487842111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385600957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010077626,0.000025335881,0.000004744223,0.002512983,0.0002751799,0.00028721185,0.00017236902,0.000010479723,0.99570394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013470063,0.00007524165,0.000046336096,0.00019949002,0.000075231685,3.318166e-7,0.000002396941,0.0000066387584,0.9861243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987442,0.0003389261,0.00015459688,0.0001589213,0.00045713567,0.00014620129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880856,0.00032778076,0.00019607873,0.00020454888,0.00041540503,0.000047621423],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061460095,0.000041683117,0.00017045213,0.00003627579,0.00023870029,0.00006947977,0.00055909413,0.000474132,0.0010618614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017415946,0.000072558316,0.00008734668,0.000042655905,0.0011671755,0.0001265519,0.00014583368,0.00085473247,0.000005146109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010441764,0.000048030535,0.00019481157,0.00006854251,0.00003604299,0.0000151106515,0.009688071,2.9677082e-7,0.0000078781495,0.074972495,0.90639925,0.008559054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021379793,0.0000074557283,0.0008649052,0.0003087723,0.00001905967,0.0000013226064,0.00064676197,3.157513e-7,0.0000022248562,0.0030858468,0.99476784,0.00008166824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6509389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7436776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09273868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017060003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002862674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385658726","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2023.12.09","title":"Stimulating Career Development: Assessment of the Effects of Guest Speaker Learning Experiences on Students Enrolled in Criminal Justice College Courses","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Psychology; Economic Justice; Intervention (counseling); Agreeableness; Medical education; Political science; Social psychology; Personality; Medicine; Criminology; Big Five personality traits; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.09665481280319241,"score_gpt":0.4613833580445222,"score_spread":0.3647285452413298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385658726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926002,0.000053759028,0.000017953425,0.0030623926,0.0029741046,0.00007756484,9.552436e-7,0.0000040742584,0.001208972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991221,0.000082322236,0.00015422144,0.00026826412,0.00017060245,0.0000071582576,0.0000014305946,0.000002945764,0.00019094325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984225,0.00055338856,0.00042840882,0.00008125747,0.0003905825,0.0001238674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673724,0.0021869184,0.0005246022,0.00003808645,0.00048827066,0.000024854731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010539789,0.000060702583,0.0001813088,0.0002357529,0.00019793226,0.000013011261,0.0003396381,0.00010212822,0.000039560164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031292909,0.000046887937,0.00003845429,0.00007284991,0.0005097469,0.00014127431,0.00006142697,0.00039782305,0.0000011735749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014959657,0.0003470947,0.2541643,0.00006245496,0.00024525193,0.000042627595,0.59305793,0.00039121087,0.0009644139,0.14869067,0.00044901052,0.0014354426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014035238,0.00032672004,0.7489196,0.00015715524,0.000105428095,0.000015807493,0.24232368,0.000048423146,0.00058986136,0.0022177612,0.0037938908,0.00009815994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000072643175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029898645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4947553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007767571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000716852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37462795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385705022","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-27654-5_6","title":"Lessons from Online Pandemic Pedagogy in North American Law Schools: Toward Law Student Wellbeing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Competence (human resources); Pedagogy; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Sociology; Legal education; Political science; Public relations; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.13973545031539022,"score_gpt":0.4711887448770878,"score_spread":0.3314532945616976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385705022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004637442,0.00005807771,0.000016722413,0.07384546,0.0009893363,0.00034390672,0.00019022518,0.00028280774,0.919636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36679423,0.0016589009,0.0006423427,0.009155165,0.0014275303,0.00003359886,0.00066586275,0.00007823033,0.61954415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785984,0.00012330682,0.0005484403,0.0004885908,0.00062691775,0.00035293752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982903,0.0006282658,0.00038029675,0.00032280618,0.00021286869,0.00016543259],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004883877,0.00024980702,0.00040300537,0.00019599395,0.00039926526,0.0003095097,0.0005136714,0.0001975571,0.0013813834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001988772,0.00025700667,0.00009932516,0.0003790896,0.00042307112,0.0004307115,0.00012050904,0.0015181727,0.0009076498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005307332,0.00006704595,0.004602383,0.0000036184688,0.00005734237,0.000009643596,0.009316572,0.0000050069525,0.0000010133657,0.97977805,0.0018143768,0.0043396465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013759479,0.00001971029,0.008687656,0.000041502477,0.000044617616,2.9154086e-7,0.021949101,0.0000021225362,3.0116473e-7,0.012934654,0.95584524,0.00033720268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39361048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9482674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96684337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003824302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013722299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385721687","doi":"10.59962/9780774850049","title":"Gender in the Legal Profession","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04731256539124179,"score_gpt":0.29693324867239934,"score_spread":0.24962068328115755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385721687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00084207865,0.000074764816,0.000017516997,0.00033467775,0.00034363946,0.00049191725,0.000057617664,0.00002892891,0.9978089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014148807,0.00007665922,0.00012461463,0.0002919993,0.0001526145,7.7294936e-7,0.000028078923,0.0000087866,0.9851677],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986305,0.00028680492,0.00016958365,0.00019893583,0.0005089708,0.00020520184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898297,0.00024253846,0.00024961206,0.00019933085,0.00027527055,0.00005029386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010137263,0.000059337523,0.00015566399,0.00006264066,0.00051552133,0.0002745666,0.00056820543,0.00032041428,0.0004583542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000852654,0.000116633295,0.00007236215,0.00005676609,0.00049512566,0.0002621185,0.00006617493,0.00075853197,0.0000071988156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009416504,0.00007202255,0.000072201015,0.00004519177,0.000021833339,0.00010516793,0.026379649,2.5897452e-7,5.097245e-7,0.039561093,0.91708577,0.016646905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019771753,0.00000929669,0.0011235077,0.00012454485,0.00003199037,0.0000053992308,0.00875207,6.152089e-7,9.8304895e-8,0.0021079676,0.9875217,0.00012509986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6846666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8301812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14551462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018925498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022418313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5018657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385832446","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4517431","title":"A Study to Create Evidence-Based Proposals for Reform of Legal Education in India-Phase II","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Phase (matter); Legal education; Political science; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.058711190245633066,"score_gpt":0.460066782830266,"score_spread":0.40135559258463294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385832446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95512116,0.00010599119,0.00019749386,0.04036258,0.00039277034,0.0010417526,0.0000026887737,0.000027789838,0.0027477797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928198,0.00015070985,0.00014693395,0.00031275468,0.00028074044,0.00011822377,0.0000048830943,0.000009957834,0.0061560334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803746,0.00022573782,0.00037887003,0.00014244195,0.00033814978,0.0008773295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989663,0.00019924555,0.00021969291,0.00011685163,0.00041516233,0.00008277588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007140409,0.00007529988,0.000128904,0.00055638055,0.0005419873,0.00010484086,0.00024812506,0.000038241727,0.000040183535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017791091,0.00006884221,0.000049026166,0.0018340574,0.00003609156,0.00090625946,0.000016580158,0.0007333274,0.000017772214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005244201,0.0046567502,0.0056882068,0.00001897975,0.00007513724,0.0000018339246,0.039675027,0.00003288422,0.00048397123,0.8594924,0.0023497434,0.08700059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038276503,0.009393057,0.013030702,0.00030524726,0.00011024167,0.000017570415,0.7896471,0.000056794834,0.0006685992,0.090081565,0.09236754,0.0004939556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065961736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016597476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7694109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016810894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048471086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385853868","doi":"10.59962/9780774851060-004","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03771093803565562,"score_gpt":0.263362030160542,"score_spread":0.22565109212488638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385853868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009809058,0.00012633378,0.000010777373,0.0002193799,0.00036812652,0.00026428018,0.00018672064,0.000063442385,0.9986628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022455119,0.00038898207,0.00034043234,0.000093705996,0.00023815995,2.8283011e-7,0.000021992595,0.000014686787,0.99665624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908984,0.00004469956,0.0001493295,0.0002221275,0.00033462502,0.00015935443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988573,0.00007343363,0.00027553225,0.00018726257,0.00049910677,0.00010736522],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019718273,0.000067029134,0.00018659797,0.0000416723,0.00047934242,0.0002300952,0.00037769394,0.00028691988,0.0067161825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050288916,0.00018800431,0.00010106125,0.000012291667,0.0004895564,0.0002350122,0.00008558429,0.0003741642,0.000077148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066824628,0.000049226142,0.000020991294,0.000030382342,0.00010813242,0.00002931376,0.004243651,3.2128858e-7,0.0000011037662,0.09142724,0.7670291,0.13705383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019254368,0.000010940374,0.00007445385,0.00014060065,0.00006947273,0.000002115755,0.00047336382,6.3675077e-7,2.4424548e-7,0.0015758722,0.9972857,0.00017402081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.399474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74174553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3422715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015453955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007421033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385869327","doi":"10.59962/9780774855792-002","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.044179194890729995,"score_gpt":0.25793329924423847,"score_spread":0.21375410435350847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385869327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015843964,0.00015372741,0.000008546235,0.00011308814,0.00041590352,0.00026386528,0.00018151196,0.000063371444,0.99864155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023385568,0.001136371,0.00022187829,0.00006996192,0.00013532709,2.8230286e-7,0.000023613324,0.000014692635,0.9960593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907434,0.00004751539,0.00014575482,0.00022340384,0.00035296025,0.00015600234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988005,0.0000780085,0.0002756903,0.00018902447,0.0005494646,0.000107310385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014020703,0.000067153924,0.00019587298,0.000042306823,0.00064472045,0.00015283944,0.0003678133,0.00028606402,0.003280713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005680634,0.00018822975,0.00010653166,0.000013636238,0.0006711123,0.00020431196,0.00008482126,0.00037350543,0.00005988281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049836412,0.000033163924,0.000020538955,0.000022041744,0.00007837954,0.000060503495,0.005006071,1.2871361e-7,6.1054243e-7,0.017220672,0.9434625,0.034090403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019278472,0.000012867963,0.000105214946,0.00013021685,0.000051023188,0.0000057578127,0.0004273068,3.9495293e-7,2.4514577e-7,0.00076543447,0.9981351,0.00017368123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4883938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.588741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10034718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012816854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009038414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385869702","doi":"10.59962/9780774855983-002","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.044179194890729995,"score_gpt":0.25793329924423847,"score_spread":0.21375410435350847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385869702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015843964,0.00015372741,0.000008546235,0.00011308814,0.00041590352,0.00026386528,0.00018151196,0.000063371444,0.99864155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023385568,0.001136371,0.00022187829,0.00006996192,0.00013532709,2.8230286e-7,0.000023613324,0.000014692635,0.9960593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907434,0.00004751539,0.00014575482,0.00022340384,0.00035296025,0.00015600234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988005,0.0000780085,0.0002756903,0.00018902447,0.0005494646,0.000107310385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014020703,0.000067153924,0.00019587298,0.000042306823,0.00064472045,0.00015283944,0.0003678133,0.00028606402,0.003280713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005680634,0.00018822975,0.00010653166,0.000013636238,0.0006711123,0.00020431196,0.00008482126,0.00037350543,0.00005988281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049836412,0.000033163924,0.000020538955,0.000022041744,0.00007837954,0.000060503495,0.005006071,1.2871361e-7,6.1054243e-7,0.017220672,0.9434625,0.034090403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019278472,0.000012867963,0.000105214946,0.00013021685,0.000051023188,0.0000057578127,0.0004273068,3.9495293e-7,2.4514577e-7,0.00076543447,0.9981351,0.00017368123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4883938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.588741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10034718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012816854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009038414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385870530","doi":"10.59962/9780774850896-002","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Donner Canadian Foundation","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06068863955259684,"score_gpt":0.28669161791566455,"score_spread":0.2260029783630677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385870530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009661099,0.0000997052,0.000034480396,0.000081810336,0.00049080676,0.00027137896,0.00014896365,0.00006198266,0.99871427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015894265,0.00023559017,0.000366346,0.00009082416,0.00015757841,1.6667605e-7,0.000022031012,0.000014700851,0.9975233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990251,0.00003807139,0.00015974078,0.00022061476,0.00037713625,0.00017930317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998703,0.00010230322,0.00028702937,0.0001840699,0.00060517376,0.00011843327],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003347914,0.00006668623,0.00018506375,0.000056220004,0.0004888211,0.00020457208,0.00036423304,0.00033046844,0.004371173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006271724,0.000187316,0.00010039143,0.000016078906,0.0005615747,0.00019027521,0.00008432335,0.00040845462,0.000056625868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012615312,0.000058834994,0.000042241667,0.00005173237,0.00014240888,0.0000859034,0.0054114675,1.4927447e-7,0.000001382072,0.15050976,0.7071257,0.13655777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018511516,0.000012803899,0.000100329846,0.00015110096,0.00006491478,0.0000023645498,0.000655778,3.4076737e-7,3.479883e-7,0.0022554777,0.9963984,0.00017302897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50603473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.774722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28927267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014739753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006864167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99653894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385966807","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v16n4p1","title":"Right to Counsel during Detention for Duty Crimes in China –A Balanced View of Corruption Combating and Human Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Law; Statutory law; Human rights; Right to counsel; Political science; Language change; Intervention (counseling); Psychology","score_opus":0.03442167226949643,"score_gpt":0.3916593778950216,"score_spread":0.35723770562552515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385966807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99294776,0.000027886786,0.00007740666,0.0035378926,0.00017273279,0.00008888092,0.0000049142272,0.0000039055762,0.0031385985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990639,0.000029823092,0.0003414538,0.000094793824,0.00011745863,0.0000017652823,0.0000016817216,0.0000023350954,0.0003468065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944824,0.000046853034,0.00025031145,0.000042106185,0.000112234375,0.00010022624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994621,0.00010697502,0.00017894807,0.000026078598,0.00017096254,0.000054900524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006492992,0.000032388256,0.0000947437,0.00009777677,0.00037768326,0.00006505829,0.00003480262,0.000027270764,0.000014522355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010831854,0.000028100414,0.00001845229,0.00016554011,0.000053368203,0.00025687128,0.0000058609135,0.00008089013,4.013237e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068417103,0.00003397051,0.0026667176,0.000049150494,0.0000070074225,8.7065735e-7,0.006023582,0.000005801313,0.0014443317,0.98946095,0.00019431105,0.000106478656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018455122,0.00031277872,0.4845496,0.0005101934,0.00006914267,0.000016539903,0.0058197137,0.00019080106,0.001704945,0.23736271,0.2673751,0.0002429376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022660063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020083478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7520982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002962338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050453094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34255388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386127164","doi":"10.32920/24030282","title":"Changing the Subject: Redefining Access to Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Milestone; Political science; Legal research; Legal realism; Subject (documents); Scholarship; Law; Economic Justice; Legal education; Variety (cybernetics); Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Empirical legal studies; Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Library science; Social science","score_opus":0.2705598342375855,"score_gpt":0.4897124995779677,"score_spread":0.2191526653403822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386127164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022562721,0.000013073208,0.002081119,0.45245808,0.0065498813,0.0004223594,0.000006720453,0.00032208284,0.5358904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7944347,0.00011346173,0.0016387965,0.028539639,0.0036782827,0.00040512942,0.00003809159,0.000041570976,0.17111032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861544,0.0002027824,0.0002060087,0.00026996265,0.0003842665,0.00032155085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980939,0.0010498025,0.00014588438,0.00034931244,0.0002769141,0.0000841715],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002630285,0.000100701625,0.000101753976,0.0002711685,0.0015019381,0.0018875129,0.0009256121,0.0001350485,0.0009788502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052236645,0.00007950608,0.000047687096,0.0017388165,0.000059782662,0.00033872057,0.0007727702,0.00077450013,0.00088859384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047375574,0.000024953206,0.00026017058,0.000044563563,0.000036120535,0.0000018774158,0.1980041,0.00054147094,0.0000038690937,0.54429996,0.2514784,0.0052997842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024849982,0.00000322797,0.000983793,0.000058649443,0.0000668867,2.814625e-7,0.11467756,0.00005596569,0.000017393591,0.008129931,0.87578094,0.00020053513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015011473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00876539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79217845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001180338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014115939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386127225","doi":"10.32920/24030282.v1","title":"Changing the Subject: Redefining Access to Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Milestone; Legal profession; Legal research; Political science; Legal realism; Subject (documents); Scholarship; Law; Economic Justice; Variety (cybernetics); Legal education; Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Empirical legal studies; Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Library science; Social science","score_opus":0.2705598342375855,"score_gpt":0.4897124995779677,"score_spread":0.2191526653403822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386127225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022562721,0.000013073208,0.002081119,0.45245808,0.0065498813,0.0004223594,0.000006720453,0.00032208284,0.5358904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7944347,0.00011346173,0.0016387965,0.028539639,0.0036782827,0.00040512942,0.00003809159,0.000041570976,0.17111032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861544,0.0002027824,0.0002060087,0.00026996265,0.0003842665,0.00032155085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980939,0.0010498025,0.00014588438,0.00034931244,0.0002769141,0.0000841715],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002630285,0.000100701625,0.000101753976,0.0002711685,0.0015019381,0.0018875129,0.0009256121,0.0001350485,0.0009788502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052236645,0.00007950608,0.000047687096,0.0017388165,0.000059782662,0.00033872057,0.0007727702,0.00077450013,0.00088859384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047375574,0.000024953206,0.00026017058,0.000044563563,0.000036120535,0.0000018774158,0.1980041,0.00054147094,0.0000038690937,0.54429996,0.2514784,0.0052997842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024849982,0.00000322797,0.000983793,0.000058649443,0.0000668867,2.814625e-7,0.11467756,0.00005596569,0.000017393591,0.008129931,0.87578094,0.00020053513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015011473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00876539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79217845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001180338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014115939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386166084","doi":"10.59962/9780774850629-011","title":"Appendix 1: Judge Advocate Generals in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appendix; Law; Political science; History; Geology","score_opus":0.04589053676840493,"score_gpt":0.25512277863086585,"score_spread":0.20923224186246092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386166084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001489382,0.00012510024,0.000008505848,0.00020492176,0.00040204864,0.00032247033,0.0003588716,0.00002362642,0.99706507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015824517,0.000259038,0.00018847254,0.00025559968,0.00009124557,3.40184e-7,0.00006748045,0.000015457535,0.9832978],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873465,0.00006171769,0.00023633604,0.0002640123,0.00044733816,0.0002559537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989489,0.00011786127,0.00031574006,0.00018997867,0.0002969667,0.00013058055],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003657713,0.00008267454,0.00025160657,0.00007295725,0.00029989425,0.00012741252,0.00040316017,0.0002226794,0.002810146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004297238,0.00022193862,0.00006198185,0.000028174822,0.0002766054,0.00017459833,0.000075291566,0.00048331122,0.000014135741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019474603,0.000041585878,0.0004789629,0.00007516293,0.00010658534,0.0005530643,0.004525146,0.000006034897,0.0000023490386,0.07511787,0.82377326,0.0953005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021484976,0.0000063162215,0.0006812765,0.00012479803,0.000030043002,0.0000038809094,0.0011750461,0.0000017643014,5.0733166e-7,0.0008004343,0.99674344,0.00021766014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17297016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007797266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064122085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386170259","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.11","title":"Aspiration and Reality in Legal Education David Sandomierski","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05579560268917917,"score_gpt":0.4047973337528322,"score_spread":0.34900173106365306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386170259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66828144,0.00046532037,0.000056526394,0.17093667,0.0025359092,0.00025785578,0.000009035034,0.000019130348,0.15743811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996987,0.00007967423,0.00013712911,0.0013768679,0.00031426505,0.000004132796,0.0000034092623,0.0000041897447,0.0010933755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990431,0.0001958355,0.0002917981,0.000086660766,0.00019151373,0.00019110726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989413,0.00016439684,0.00018853114,0.000080923346,0.00029760244,0.00032725764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018571516,0.000050700295,0.0000936803,0.00027880084,0.00039117143,0.00028930264,0.00015209858,0.00006268515,0.00012122325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012126933,0.000054295484,0.000022424603,0.0007816574,0.0002003013,0.0014144527,0.0000044528815,0.00028594013,0.000020742333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013959804,0.000025566907,0.012926022,0.000010434852,0.000007261458,0.00002696083,0.022777306,0.00002185072,0.000066359105,0.9235453,0.024261015,0.016317979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018235318,0.000025519905,0.037215207,0.000053574793,0.000008112323,0.000014994759,0.0042004497,0.0000074867976,0.0000228902,0.0072518396,0.9509394,0.00007812764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29356402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64336455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9266784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002504343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009379411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386175803","doi":"10.59962/9780774855396-002","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.06068863955259684,"score_gpt":0.28669161791566455,"score_spread":0.2260029783630677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386175803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009661099,0.0000997052,0.000034480396,0.000081810336,0.00049080676,0.00027137896,0.00014896365,0.00006198266,0.99871427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015894265,0.00023559017,0.000366346,0.00009082416,0.00015757841,1.6667605e-7,0.000022031012,0.000014700851,0.9975233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990251,0.00003807139,0.00015974078,0.00022061476,0.00037713625,0.00017930317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998703,0.00010230322,0.00028702937,0.0001840699,0.00060517376,0.00011843327],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003347914,0.00006668623,0.00018506375,0.000056220004,0.0004888211,0.00020457208,0.00036423304,0.00033046844,0.004371173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006271724,0.000187316,0.00010039143,0.000016078906,0.0005615747,0.00019027521,0.00008432335,0.00040845462,0.000056625868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012615312,0.000058834994,0.000042241667,0.00005173237,0.00014240888,0.0000859034,0.0054114675,1.4927447e-7,0.000001382072,0.15050976,0.7071257,0.13655777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018511516,0.000012803899,0.000100329846,0.00015110096,0.00006491478,0.0000023645498,0.000655778,3.4076737e-7,3.479883e-7,0.0022554777,0.9963984,0.00017302897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50603473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.774722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28927267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014739753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006864167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99653894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386181658","doi":"10.59962/9780774850193-007","title":"Ethics in Canadian Universities","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06822722028065194,"score_gpt":0.29696406343938686,"score_spread":0.22873684315873494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386181658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003788014,0.00007623994,0.000005484854,0.0005365614,0.0002627977,0.00021763379,0.00026702526,0.000030522762,0.9982249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013924609,0.0002731838,0.00016047129,0.0002338728,0.00006108012,8.0046625e-8,0.000026604472,0.000012151342,0.98530793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989205,0.0000831592,0.0001458618,0.00020749237,0.0003530369,0.0002899568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870515,0.00023930824,0.0001810687,0.0001528308,0.0004928119,0.00022883057],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076145085,0.00006853031,0.00018533012,0.000198793,0.00059016317,0.00017198926,0.00036787198,0.00064754335,0.0018285942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000718257,0.00020114888,0.00006971102,0.000032669614,0.00073423854,0.00023052307,0.00004876498,0.0011031643,0.00001165172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012981426,0.000025407819,0.00021427468,0.00007207255,0.00007977074,0.00056401105,0.043877278,0.00000219902,2.793071e-7,0.81913346,0.11762801,0.018390246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015804605,0.000009117409,0.00034813362,0.00019285716,0.00003101731,0.0000029080559,0.009393485,9.14931e-7,7.123029e-8,0.0016891371,0.9879864,0.00018792857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87035835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008851579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008571972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386423294","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2023.2233876","title":"Can that be law for me? <b>The Long Arc of Legality: Hobbes, Kelsen, Hart</b> , edited by David Dyzenhaus, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2022, hardback/ebook, (ISBN: 978131651805-2) £73.00, pp. i-xiv, 1-475","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi; Mansfield College, University of Oxford","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.050260016145901705,"score_gpt":0.33131046721104523,"score_spread":0.28105045106514354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386423294","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13076925,0.002309336,0.0012787074,0.65870583,0.009702821,0.005908332,0.006825892,0.0012946994,0.1832051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70635086,0.0017662776,0.00028129434,0.003426621,0.0011404242,0.00011067678,0.0005636206,0.00006759641,0.28629264],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652016,0.0005291626,0.0004681004,0.0006273347,0.0010996495,0.0007556159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964457,0.001254482,0.0005543071,0.0007419258,0.00072598417,0.00027758096],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021957222,0.000292194,0.00037190592,0.000121626974,0.0018110651,0.00040403826,0.0011772002,0.00025544094,0.00015215046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00100826,0.0002853203,0.00018689146,0.0014930967,0.0009819457,0.001436979,0.00020133288,0.00067683164,0.000074939664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051109575,0.00012883106,0.001160514,0.000058315,0.00006602336,0.000009480369,0.0030718825,0.000006097393,0.0008322774,0.13542514,0.8589036,0.0002867734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041639322,0.000042370815,0.0032328148,0.000050349565,0.00009919635,0.0000028031498,0.005146321,0.00006107585,0.0044977725,0.00007117901,0.9860446,0.00033511184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0652642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01025158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6552792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003149154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014171697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386469274","doi":"10.7202/1100314ar","title":"Les tribunaux comme objet de recherche en sciences sociales et sciences humaines","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Human science; Humanities; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.39931877058160004,"score_gpt":0.4666293668989892,"score_spread":0.06731059631738917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386469274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2185824,0.0013180947,0.0008764072,0.23356032,0.00079872686,0.00025298024,0.000053912725,0.0002577828,0.54429936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68573886,0.0071579055,0.012075592,0.0043584406,0.0011675161,0.00001542691,0.000044243196,0.000042262494,0.28939977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939043,0.003970766,0.00029949777,0.00045843152,0.00041430426,0.00095272757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99319607,0.005893933,0.00025523492,0.00019294878,0.00021219905,0.00024960522],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016979422,0.0002129697,0.00026341164,0.00041463104,0.0041340296,0.00044924993,0.0010242268,0.0006194145,0.0012329313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00445141,0.0002726695,0.00016916396,0.0050359378,0.0029109188,0.0012127704,0.00019455851,0.0010708404,0.00036135278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012141221,0.00010450719,0.011523736,0.000090138856,0.00004087835,0.00003206846,0.04261795,0.0004945815,0.0004366267,0.9179078,0.019786078,0.0069535486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000291308,0.00010702804,0.010171669,0.00023455251,0.000100096695,0.000041642146,0.050605167,0.0010473601,0.00025813121,0.1753183,0.7614332,0.0003915834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016534444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013087364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7425895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077930586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006497731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386800476","doi":"10.23977/aetp.2023.071004","title":"An Exploration of Moral Education and Rule of Law Education in the Course of Ideological and Political Theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; Northwestern University","keywords":"Morality; Legal education; Sociology; Law; Rule of law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05589902648274713,"score_gpt":0.5018271828151759,"score_spread":0.44592815633242877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386800476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.907601,0.001816163,0.00005458155,0.077470906,0.0003353073,0.00018660667,0.0000054495727,0.000010594067,0.012519371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972067,0.0009210398,0.0009038513,0.0007649858,0.000049309518,0.000078208985,0.000024605908,0.000002698153,0.000048629026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905336,0.00030415933,0.0002795945,0.00016267937,0.000077763165,0.0001224549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889416,0.0006498624,0.00015139193,0.00013626348,0.00014252364,0.000025831734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093257014,0.0000574868,0.000122018704,0.00039955173,0.0000856494,0.0000066098014,0.00013201701,0.00015070983,0.000026622709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004937139,0.000049447837,0.000007993037,0.00086604955,0.0016293669,0.0007661096,0.0000126678015,0.00018724478,7.3030077e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001737807,0.00056133623,0.08974808,0.000013472023,0.0000021726248,3.9947007e-8,0.0047789644,9.545685e-7,0.00009938765,0.8812065,0.000057608308,0.023514086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009056374,0.00006175671,0.18098791,0.000014177107,0.0000046224836,0.0000049889395,0.034898054,0.0000019655658,0.000036947462,0.78003335,0.0038284052,0.00003726034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027375275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072746177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10117317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001171002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061244774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60034704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386971959","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501768521.003.0015","title":"Annus Horribilis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cornell University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Champion; Supreme court; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; History","score_opus":0.15152706590082476,"score_gpt":0.2929931824947224,"score_spread":0.14146611659389763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386971959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016605356,0.000017906726,0.000048585123,0.00044589158,0.0009774142,0.00026560237,0.000088731205,0.00029744316,0.99784184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022955548,0.00015586441,0.000028758217,0.00017960489,0.00031031648,5.746861e-7,0.000036540383,0.00002786269,0.99696493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990174,0.000071559814,0.00012984217,0.00032946933,0.0002383236,0.000213393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869084,0.00026682534,0.0002031981,0.00034618372,0.00034585185,0.00014711563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030846868,0.00015398799,0.00016345573,0.00015070199,0.00058667996,0.00012823349,0.00044267828,0.0003508874,0.00043687693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001386075,0.00019914395,0.00010654583,0.000031315165,0.00036422498,0.00022504212,0.000117674776,0.0005971809,0.0003708023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011552468,0.000006337342,0.0000026532527,0.000008757564,0.000034578065,0.000033090037,0.0033571955,0.0000023997113,7.285869e-7,0.92256665,0.072347686,0.0016283519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000980624,0.000010623083,0.0000108978375,0.000027715369,0.00007192961,5.591154e-7,0.00097158627,0.000004392175,0.0000026405792,0.008436087,0.99014723,0.00021824498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00463843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011367097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9177996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002076029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007723671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81208545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386984665","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-96073-6_9669","title":"Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the United Kingdom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington; Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Killam Trusts; Tel Aviv University; Camargo Foundation; University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Canada Council for the Arts; Government of Canada","keywords":"Commonwealth; Scholarship; Kingdom; Commission; Political science; Public administration; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.18324664096516216,"score_gpt":0.39590582291457416,"score_spread":0.212659181949412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386984665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030503582,0.000044302546,0.0000057559187,0.014585876,0.00072796876,0.0006210162,0.000034602555,0.00014206945,0.9835334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95689386,0.0000753261,0.000052242554,0.0026441463,0.00047608124,0.000035211637,0.00015936143,0.00005314812,0.039610595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974857,0.00053376437,0.0004872803,0.00031035685,0.00078310136,0.00039977994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727064,0.0013846435,0.00037410227,0.00057634385,0.00024901048,0.00014524546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029903338,0.00026717933,0.00026738914,0.00063386135,0.0009843212,0.0003866265,0.0008285656,0.00041719005,0.00057455763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008183134,0.00021783753,0.000109505,0.00028692457,0.00032087762,0.0000034442426,0.00008255694,0.00176145,0.0005624079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104495375,8.4197745e-7,0.0004075441,0.000014533256,0.000017441942,0.000016924692,0.009452711,5.0049897e-7,0.0000019469244,0.98728764,0.00064292346,0.0021465635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012153634,0.000015370562,0.0011897811,0.000112729285,0.000018922303,0.0000019934328,0.0011313823,0.0000018823246,9.848305e-7,0.59493804,0.4022782,0.00018917654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01195816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016283749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95658886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019173534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008471753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387103439","doi":"10.1017/s1744552323000228","title":"Deliberative Experience and the Civic Aspirations of Legal Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Queen Mary University of London","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Scholarship; Politics; Legal education; Sociology; Law; Political science; Civic engagement; Public administration","score_opus":0.07293135299148787,"score_gpt":0.4386718920952426,"score_spread":0.3657405391037547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387103439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68048316,0.00027925978,0.00024222473,0.18636659,0.0034311789,0.00020928576,0.000006065606,0.000011515493,0.12897071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996415,0.0001482428,0.00012247798,0.001907357,0.0002705394,0.000012087311,0.0000018131889,0.0000027213698,0.0011197174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989276,0.00019517989,0.00038668248,0.00005472749,0.00036931608,0.00006649296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787116,0.0006615903,0.00033783453,0.000051035946,0.0010480387,0.00003033508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010680731,0.0000400542,0.000088015804,0.00015276401,0.00013483336,0.00014600698,0.00025436791,0.00002736559,0.00012447528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013732935,0.000030481691,0.00003681636,0.00032448367,0.00041020647,0.000999989,0.000021167323,0.00018377145,0.000007744812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041396434,0.00005175262,0.00069785095,8.386195e-7,0.000018731285,0.0000015307014,0.06388009,0.00001605273,0.00007381124,0.9251162,0.0010636431,0.009038105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012489834,0.000037421054,0.007005601,0.00010145833,0.000013600728,0.000027436741,0.08406699,0.000117557334,0.0003018602,0.034095068,0.87289083,0.00009320055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050326725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005697044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89102113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006490487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088131713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76079285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387234202","doi":"10.1080/17508487.2023.2261472","title":"Kîyokêwin (Visiting), leadership, and consenting to learn in public: indigenizing social sciences and humanities at the Royal Military College of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sociology; Law; Indigenization; Supreme court; Treaty; Political science; Media studies","score_opus":0.298791295127758,"score_gpt":0.4611899160526445,"score_spread":0.1623986209248865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387234202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77380943,0.0010913255,2.872513e-7,0.21529569,0.0004922263,0.00013723555,0.0000079290685,0.000008754905,0.009157122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966545,0.00006078086,0.00005240014,0.0016512935,0.00015484107,0.00003732314,0.0000016423842,0.0000030743188,0.0013841487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988604,0.00025882895,0.00021507706,0.00015406933,0.00023284307,0.0002787923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970939,0.0026159436,0.000032480835,0.00003732973,0.00018792727,0.00003237705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017909511,0.000055822064,0.000102777725,0.00014919543,0.0018126935,0.00004571772,0.00008461551,0.000030445326,0.00003203739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012691835,0.0000510629,0.000007854586,0.000976163,0.0014517735,0.00020752812,0.00008304481,0.00014701048,0.0000013684261],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008477611,0.000085344414,0.073661104,0.00014978596,0.000014834166,0.0000018924322,0.3973324,0.0000071154004,0.00001830692,0.4598626,0.06409262,0.0047655134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003999651,0.000009358243,0.05377195,0.0000467193,0.0000041109774,4.999755e-7,0.90928733,0.0000127181465,0.000007652941,0.0022936112,0.03445851,0.00006754665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17367424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7827799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6091056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028661863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00184653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387617283","doi":"10.24144/2307-3322.2023.79.1.16","title":"Access to justice in Canada: A noteworthy experience","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07592047492229895,"score_gpt":0.3662415899813295,"score_spread":0.2903211150590306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387617283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2762626,0.000006400763,0.000047138215,0.36523187,0.001110132,0.00032371865,0.000061886654,0.00012941411,0.35682684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98333627,0.00003528771,0.0002237786,0.008158411,0.000121596575,0.0000037504117,0.000024737305,0.0000043970563,0.00809176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988829,0.00010128567,0.000107590466,0.00017671562,0.00051270024,0.00021883068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991336,0.00025209808,0.000044994642,0.00007957641,0.0003743363,0.000115427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027567067,0.00006145306,0.00007034708,0.00017612411,0.0007244389,0.00012683793,0.00036132176,0.000038534952,0.0005928595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057508075,0.00008028972,0.00001524302,0.0025675525,0.00007836546,0.0023113275,0.000076344106,0.00015117985,0.00007098368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034417488,0.000019806956,0.0022107551,0.0000045635265,0.000005128194,0.00002144789,0.012688508,0.0007174152,0.000016827335,0.94183135,0.042277373,0.00017239888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009447261,0.000004773819,0.017810414,0.000005319897,0.0000032592125,5.2854625e-7,0.022199674,0.000026311414,0.00001848754,0.0008744269,0.9588563,0.00010604381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9539142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94095695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001358322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005148614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.913342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387987630","doi":"10.1515/9782763759449-004","title":"Le champ juridique canadien et les juristes réformateurs","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.05027829881553902,"score_gpt":0.3299827382815399,"score_spread":0.2797044394660009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387987630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003621262,0.00021818122,0.000026927171,0.29619133,0.0017512167,0.00023840104,0.0000967496,0.000075468,0.7010396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17506862,0.0012779783,0.00036200462,0.007186642,0.00040523123,0.00005750808,0.0001947894,0.000045804518,0.81540143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789596,0.00034522553,0.0005135343,0.0003541215,0.00048888964,0.00040229302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826497,0.00047464663,0.00044496244,0.00030582363,0.0002805734,0.0002290356],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014886471,0.0002895112,0.00027538114,0.00021865363,0.0021011913,0.00023269214,0.00045129764,0.00033028226,0.047062155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026462818,0.0003240764,0.0001498391,0.00027918193,0.0004482905,0.0012645194,0.000114218536,0.0015197153,0.0006454811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004077672,0.00005183309,0.000055736746,0.000020151294,0.000053988933,0.0000064579513,0.012983798,0.0000090019275,0.0000014084795,0.965671,0.016816631,0.0043259123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008336017,0.000044418066,0.00006782749,0.000019512609,0.00001931991,0.000013663737,0.015000978,0.0000040098294,0.000008764327,0.018791255,0.9655641,0.00038281805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5123663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3608475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94874746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040892407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01101225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388174527","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195386073.003.0011","title":"The Role Of Volunteer Lawyers In Challenging The Conditions Of A Local Housing Crisis In Buffalo, Ny","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Legal profession; Legal service; Public relations; Service (business); Public administration; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.02536815595630202,"score_gpt":0.33197943563615434,"score_spread":0.3066112796798523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388174527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025370624,0.00062847254,0.00006585246,0.0407783,0.00013825744,0.00022748539,0.000008613224,0.000012007203,0.9578873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586268,0.0005476756,0.000041280025,0.00049719313,0.00008596843,0.000008914957,0.0000056091303,0.000009925233,0.040176645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989312,0.00008680558,0.00040522905,0.000120609235,0.00029846598,0.0001576645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986886,0.0006336333,0.0002635071,0.00019183679,0.00019879066,0.000023682445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000989683,0.00009388331,0.00015862727,0.00017921082,0.00029271832,0.000048862126,0.0002438751,0.0001498643,0.00054134394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016610086,0.00006530954,0.000065273765,0.0002248425,0.0003824702,0.0002016193,0.000020009547,0.00048802848,0.000011293794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036951724,0.000028090586,0.00003904575,0.0000028362483,0.000012100303,3.5957814e-7,0.011622674,0.000048850845,0.0000036491165,0.9796345,0.0019553818,0.0066487985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008642211,0.000012044643,0.00025947555,0.000076249074,0.000017813347,3.310568e-7,0.10246348,0.00006707267,0.000017857947,0.07987374,0.8170222,0.000103346356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025238134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07444696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95837307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012344205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005757095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9812529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388280863","doi":"10.1037/law0000404","title":"Deaf community experiences in the Canadian justice system.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychology Public Policy and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.19857336616868973,"score_gpt":0.48777933323038203,"score_spread":0.2892059670616923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388280863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09328195,0.000015140232,0.0000011153307,0.32533547,0.00032623034,0.00006952803,0.0000029527162,0.000035453504,0.5809322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611848,0.00002286682,0.000009688378,0.037910532,0.00026441988,0.0000812112,0.0000072122693,0.0000024228577,0.0005168446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981921,0.001179733,0.000117686744,0.00008491146,0.00010920228,0.00031639833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990061,0.00059188326,0.000038999697,0.00018966422,0.00005432594,0.00011901585],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003098783,0.000045074336,0.00005572066,0.00025167354,0.0026884181,0.00033501213,0.00035355936,0.00009346217,0.00007209111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012880276,0.000036193804,0.000010320032,0.0017419526,0.0006045981,0.0004189451,0.000013622883,0.00041565485,0.0000830493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.428736e-7,0.000015086825,0.00040092177,0.0000035880198,0.0000018760198,0.0000010970502,0.1414162,5.0868174e-8,3.4655864e-7,0.84380376,0.013865159,0.0004912668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057766014,0.0000065558447,0.011045815,0.0000019375116,0.0000028815682,0.000005914591,0.20884232,0.0000027819476,8.977466e-8,0.0036947806,0.7763016,0.00003751664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91894364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9538613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8679029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000788648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092107296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388734056","doi":"10.29242/lawstats.2022","title":"ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 2022","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Library science; Academic library; Political science; Law; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2879908352415222,"score_gpt":0.5210549830829864,"score_spread":0.23306414784146418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388734056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000053029553,0.00014988614,0.000085242384,0.049724232,0.0068819863,0.00020169448,0.00035923635,0.00044270133,0.9421497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00058925897,0.0110735,0.0013119447,0.0035289973,0.003165401,0.000044608754,0.0009335175,0.000050511884,0.9793023],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778914,0.00017979516,0.00040921886,0.00024582888,0.0011000185,0.0002759816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979886,0.0009732759,0.000321759,0.00021371146,0.0003669828,0.00013566058],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013262,0.00012746282,0.00017694628,0.00015879227,0.0005926601,0.0003308179,0.000360491,0.000492295,0.023667892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028135232,0.0001279716,0.00004694221,0.0009995231,0.00021386537,0.0009507259,0.000076898184,0.0016814512,0.002761418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.7492102e-7,0.000007643732,0.00007421414,0.00001237889,0.0000122531965,0.0000028422269,0.00081746746,7.413913e-8,1.8259823e-7,0.42378697,0.5723771,0.0029084461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021626824,0.0000047098792,0.00014192905,0.000021006534,0.000026469776,0.0000012410314,0.002127435,0.0000014591822,0.0000015772537,0.01843484,0.9790533,0.00016436337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031148698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00669261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4066763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001742111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015140074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388759617","doi":"10.36591/se-d-4604-07","title":"Freedom of Information Requests and Peer Review Reports","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Editor","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Confidentiality; Transparency (behavior); Internet privacy; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Misconduct; Public relations; Academic freedom; Context (archaeology); Institution; Political science; Intellectual property; Anonymity; Business; Law; Computer science; Higher education","score_opus":0.036391627848315275,"score_gpt":0.4145758166783184,"score_spread":0.3781841888300031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388759617","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012272226,0.0002603158,0.00006909962,0.5083955,0.104653575,0.00069173065,0.00001250011,0.0002540372,0.37339103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9063855,0.0057975724,0.00531656,0.007664787,0.042935774,0.00013009246,0.00009007653,0.000014463959,0.031665206],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984487,0.000030849813,0.00021220186,0.00008194414,0.0011004263,0.00012587634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981592,0.000109425884,0.00018829961,0.0001300357,0.0013441404,0.00006888688],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067869164,0.000028587547,0.000054165004,0.00014265697,0.00037968892,0.0001466112,0.00013844811,0.000024537048,0.00013607414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021956503,0.00002572627,0.000010158337,0.0023239553,0.000543068,0.0032243526,0.00003068652,0.000083145285,0.00006364063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.229025e-7,0.0000050190065,0.00084305473,0.000033809963,6.0327415e-7,4.0111433e-7,0.0049575428,4.1065985e-7,0.000058282418,0.018272437,0.9726239,0.0032042314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013242867,0.0000057284833,0.0029091951,0.000050026614,0.0000026602174,0.0000010828154,0.0014920614,0.0000071968802,0.000022965058,0.00095470354,0.9945074,0.00003378871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008022624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004735641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89411324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033174772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012661756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388972738","doi":"10.1108/s0733-558x202387","title":"Revitalizing Collegiality: Restoring Faculty Authority in Universities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research in the sociology of organizations","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stockholms Universitet; Uppsala Universitet; Vetenskapsrådet; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Division of Chemistry; Umeå Universitet","keywords":"Collegiality; Political science; Management; Public administration; Sociology; Pedagogy; Economics","score_opus":0.35525272268596053,"score_gpt":0.5390946225824963,"score_spread":0.18384189989653577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388972738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061608604,0.00030941807,0.000018620683,0.15403667,0.0008243478,0.00094934914,0.00015419611,0.00007749221,0.83746904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.103653476,0.0012776555,0.0001328551,0.00016271189,0.00068426,0.000036481542,0.0004482993,0.000038051563,0.8935662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954434,0.0029598253,0.00035588673,0.00022394134,0.00064509345,0.00037186753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99396604,0.004141048,0.00017639951,0.00028590634,0.0013872865,0.00004334511],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010158136,0.00009263465,0.00023346794,0.0007702529,0.001137495,0.000058099533,0.00072041695,0.0004773982,0.00021333832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008625205,0.00009083708,0.000033429686,0.0041098827,0.002247109,0.00026795774,0.00013285059,0.0018954831,0.000095350486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002353031,0.00003878539,0.0008833581,0.000036988306,0.000015527401,0.000006687577,0.1548978,0.000009027428,0.0000027695846,0.75626886,0.08781021,0.000027647126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013538735,0.000021558197,0.0027214088,0.0001524176,0.000013002149,6.9450306e-7,0.2905711,0.0000026169466,0.0000010543722,0.12554568,0.58071023,0.00012482883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006245562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051157363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6307232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016914646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014493433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388987439","doi":"10.1515/9781552383452-004","title":"The Legal Archives Society of Alberta","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.0323552443942359,"score_gpt":0.26604797805714625,"score_spread":0.23369273366291035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388987439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009426577,0.00012496553,0.0001254003,0.0017758998,0.0001314814,0.00016649185,0.000008510004,0.000013066585,0.9976448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00045098676,0.00057212147,0.0007372191,0.000093862145,0.0001047761,1.4440913e-7,0.000007427048,0.000007630774,0.99802583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927133,0.00005912165,0.00015088946,0.00012948195,0.00026662578,0.00012253826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985967,0.0006444757,0.00034291373,0.00022399951,0.0001350318,0.0000568437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018172231,0.00009474275,0.00014725361,0.0000342317,0.00058137474,0.00003018214,0.00043072616,0.00015398207,0.00026251533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035373723,0.000093635696,0.00019339738,0.0000090252015,0.0012386928,0.00013695641,0.000083327366,0.0003776388,0.0000053833087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025144125,0.000010076012,0.0000016215797,0.000012737269,0.0000855575,4.1092116e-7,0.016074173,5.770002e-7,0.0000065393065,0.9556177,0.008705371,0.01946006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010410014,0.000011335211,0.000010045924,0.000034239103,0.00006151894,3.5443907e-7,0.0010401137,0.000016285776,0.000019161193,0.0023790908,0.99623173,0.00009201702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029049572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014792193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98752636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003284199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077592954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9774161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389050480","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2022.95","title":"Revolving Doors: Social Dimensions of Law Firm Culture and Pathways out of Firms","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Human capital; Collegiality; Corporate law; Social capital; Business; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Political science; Corporate governance; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.14629373761606684,"score_gpt":0.4132128146671756,"score_spread":0.26691907705110873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389050480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5165743,0.0004292214,0.000027942557,0.04222442,0.0049492028,0.00071818294,0.0001870171,0.00042672973,0.434463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99619985,0.00011618323,0.00015091375,0.00086571096,0.0011580434,0.000014192467,0.00003213171,0.000012235207,0.0014507184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871933,0.00020103916,0.00032207748,0.0001678996,0.00035034856,0.0002392817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902433,0.0002504222,0.00026091543,0.0000917677,0.00031441578,0.000058168494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007028857,0.00009429674,0.00021544492,0.00003285555,0.0014549787,0.00006664315,0.0001508367,0.00020834424,0.00012935037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036672465,0.0000857282,0.00008631814,0.0006286871,0.0012567308,0.00050390826,0.00007324661,0.00026075394,0.00002930209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051824586,0.00004742332,0.000103527134,0.000020394276,0.00001914292,6.469793e-7,0.25772074,2.3985075e-7,0.0009711354,0.7224234,0.018302768,0.00038540264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028790944,0.000036455567,0.0022642666,0.00003871105,0.000056235738,2.4949472e-7,0.112344235,0.000004904245,0.00033120238,0.059172116,0.8252466,0.00021716113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004141155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027076167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8069438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047982332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024774158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389317178","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_121","title":"Framework of Considerations for Academic Integrity in Quality Assurance in Canadian Higher Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Academic integrity; Higher education; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Jurisdiction; Curriculum; Public relations; Engineering management; Engineering ethics; Business; Engineering; Operations management; Law; External quality assessment","score_opus":0.24590412210266446,"score_gpt":0.4924771975916611,"score_spread":0.24657307548899662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389317178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019352313,0.00007036592,0.00002234707,0.1631553,0.0018186948,0.0006478286,0.00009485763,0.000026935053,0.8339701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28971717,0.00017579521,0.002251883,0.0031035508,0.00036154443,0.00013682648,0.000068724694,0.000020276892,0.7041642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986109,0.00011568113,0.000614017,0.00022298834,0.00020687755,0.00022952007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558103,0.0033902815,0.00028069265,0.00017607455,0.000451427,0.0001205173],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019454263,0.00011163321,0.00022747551,0.00053292036,0.00016065825,0.00005271215,0.0001445386,0.0007677591,0.003019108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007158302,0.00012821786,0.00004981249,0.0003035436,0.00013822081,0.0003171082,0.00000861726,0.0016159709,0.00006276826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002232613,0.000016116928,0.0020664912,0.000022411634,0.0000055613395,1.6432915e-7,0.002992189,0.0000017203836,8.0625426e-7,0.97035104,0.024082804,0.00045844703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035946265,0.0000026756456,0.008367149,0.00011866945,0.0000042849265,6.5441746e-8,0.0007243463,7.6723404e-7,8.5503507e-7,0.54243773,0.448209,0.00009853941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.836559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42791334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065114576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020677868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99789226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389332693","doi":"10.7202/1107389ar","title":"[ Sans Titre - No Title ]CONSTITUTION DU ROYAUME-UNI : DES ORIGINES À NOS JOURS","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Humanities; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.014443653544432927,"score_gpt":0.2591921797009691,"score_spread":0.24474852615653617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389332693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013996927,0.0007061064,0.0007655983,0.019491304,0.0009769603,0.0000920461,0.0000118682465,0.000059463273,0.96389973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30208817,0.0027372618,0.0024317815,0.0012610252,0.0014623296,0.0000011819787,0.000022098677,0.000011173913,0.689985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993013,0.00007125591,0.000112992726,0.00014363916,0.00010444722,0.0002663386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941117,0.00006954113,0.00008084604,0.00012994203,0.00016805199,0.00014042942],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022092646,0.00009297875,0.00009917606,0.000088443456,0.0005314414,0.000077733916,0.000172037,0.00015455032,0.008696174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001520629,0.00012341958,0.000071885705,0.00050567766,0.00021959186,0.00048931694,0.000014759916,0.00023998313,0.0025012412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010528626,0.00009270439,0.0013898849,0.00003013111,0.000020794625,0.000034944194,0.0027474205,0.00008159473,0.00013468169,0.9096151,0.07323889,0.012603343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013134263,0.000030744202,0.001978562,0.00009722519,0.000066072316,0.00003875638,0.0006562707,0.0002228638,0.00006400006,0.003698231,0.992874,0.0001419212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018478817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010828509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9196351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001452133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090061023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389333278","doi":"10.7202/1105869ar","title":"AVANT-PROPOS","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Sherbrooke","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.02610686971817812,"score_gpt":0.28349780817845643,"score_spread":0.25739093846027833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389333278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07187005,0.00060521066,0.00032305124,0.17819148,0.004390954,0.0002476195,0.000034628934,0.0002894778,0.7440475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05712724,0.0023111089,0.00061876746,0.0011289218,0.00082841597,0.0000041036515,0.000032282638,0.000026377715,0.9379228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984942,0.00020267283,0.00018740931,0.00027343445,0.0002134857,0.00062876695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888295,0.0002904461,0.00013008462,0.00026090807,0.00015218582,0.0002834142],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072639604,0.0001324502,0.00015361869,0.00020814544,0.0008766874,0.0001082593,0.0003705284,0.00026797474,0.01147986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031179536,0.00019751729,0.00012311303,0.0016132182,0.00025621886,0.000640506,0.00009575514,0.00048560774,0.013440101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019256418,0.00008421714,0.0019842228,0.00012106994,0.00005840453,0.00018208912,0.027636677,0.00022003966,0.00044907417,0.78035355,0.1768208,0.01207062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022386198,0.000029839342,0.0030553383,0.00010297985,0.00008269143,0.000040642248,0.0067147785,0.0009327289,0.00015273606,0.009093038,0.9793481,0.00022322065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003451351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032048654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80252737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003109786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009902031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98942375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389599817","doi":"10.4337/9781803921426.00006","title":"Introducing law clinics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07289489891367576,"score_gpt":0.3533706939635994,"score_spread":0.2804757950499236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389599817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004382001,0.000040498773,0.00004384611,0.040085483,0.008956457,0.00030640917,0.00003311502,0.0007232096,0.9498066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010009349,0.000051076753,0.0008432005,0.0056667267,0.0076419846,0.000022302173,0.00013596407,0.000121764,0.984516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715924,0.00014063173,0.0006461051,0.00058635254,0.0009811195,0.00048655193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996685,0.0010692822,0.00057727663,0.0006346925,0.00078954,0.0002441872],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004171385,0.00027956482,0.0003403714,0.00033468095,0.001291787,0.005377645,0.0008420514,0.0008147665,0.0011791093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004949105,0.00031556247,0.0001882721,0.00012389167,0.00040265202,0.0020794547,0.00018406162,0.0026194556,0.0016125877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031205793,0.0000053945273,0.0000028457914,0.00001123695,0.00004387285,0.000004673753,0.0057958835,9.833022e-7,5.7718205e-7,0.7370273,0.24316855,0.013935579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007947232,0.000010842472,0.000003158815,0.0000802399,0.00004039045,0.0000010845981,0.00067621184,0.0000018533889,0.0000016640431,0.1426575,0.85614777,0.0002998002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053509646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009847497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61297923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031420117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025030277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390718764","doi":"10.1017/9781108779968","title":"The Science of Virtue","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Foundation (evidence); Value (mathematics); Moral character; Engineering ethics; Resource (disambiguation); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03457755299512095,"score_gpt":0.2978143054580405,"score_spread":0.26323675246291955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390718764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003313869,0.00013507024,0.000015370484,0.0012857197,0.0012479922,0.00021580415,0.000049585255,0.000057697904,0.9969596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002683359,0.0001017565,0.000021577878,0.000048192232,0.00021133442,6.009656e-7,0.000004536434,0.000008997997,0.99691963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886173,0.000088652145,0.00013190805,0.00022303946,0.00050218595,0.00019249825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984709,0.00037104715,0.00018815184,0.0003244754,0.00055143004,0.00009399846],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089818216,0.00009747841,0.000110288005,0.00017438002,0.001382601,0.00026599568,0.0008945713,0.0001278407,0.000004049622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002912589,0.00008943202,0.00007643376,0.00012344871,0.0026204558,0.00026516037,0.00018782828,0.00054384867,0.000029879453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004557444,0.0000033107092,8.8433296e-8,0.000012014812,0.000014868869,0.0000032497574,0.00063771586,1.5199171e-7,0.000013336374,0.7078289,0.2909874,0.0004943988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038364593,0.000007760439,0.0000024257076,0.00004762361,0.000059589092,6.13214e-7,0.001328147,0.000004572875,0.00009642729,0.00011863245,0.99819756,0.00009826782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018189516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046556335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70771027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004712491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00867639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391174902","doi":"10.56367/oag-041-11263","title":"Impacts to address sexual violence in Canada and internationally","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Access Government","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual violence; Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.06599118521184377,"score_gpt":0.4530828338700458,"score_spread":0.387091648658202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391174902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8287869,0.000054696466,0.000029171444,0.06405026,0.0007665626,0.00036912214,0.000049009675,0.000008316629,0.10588598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944675,0.000058226637,0.0000671622,0.0030154337,0.00007011117,0.000049952057,0.0000022598508,0.000003914211,0.0022654505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990466,0.00004826423,0.00012575519,0.00015968631,0.0004967336,0.00012290814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959993,0.00016820723,0.000032331973,0.00007101314,0.000029712175,0.00009879996],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044211082,0.000046372134,0.000051498962,0.000023993769,0.00009657115,0.0021578984,0.00058288674,0.000013454822,0.001015849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032481362,0.000044986824,0.0000034285042,0.0003222509,0.000015280706,0.001961835,0.00031404855,0.00011225209,0.000018413524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058374168,0.0001376804,0.37147287,0.000051641142,0.000052885636,0.00005898339,0.01940902,0.00009968743,0.00020288525,0.21102883,0.15379308,0.24363407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010607316,0.000012494233,0.29936424,0.0001548015,0.000004300494,9.930972e-7,0.011179389,0.00007554158,0.00010437482,0.0006512049,0.68820256,0.00014404253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99558306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53440946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016916583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035580115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391205036","doi":"10.5040/9798400655036.ch-041","title":"William Vickrey (1914-1996): An Expert on Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection and a Laureate of 1996","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nobel laureate; Moral hazard; Adverse selection; Hazard; Selection (genetic algorithm); Economics; Philosophy; Actuarial science; Computer science; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.048279948193667675,"score_gpt":0.35949576761436897,"score_spread":0.3112158194207013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391205036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018937031,0.00022281594,0.000015335669,0.0022718855,0.0003737678,0.00023057114,0.000011274179,0.00013823612,0.9948424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.083863474,0.0020678781,0.0018698401,0.0012823743,0.0006767296,0.000027824746,0.000028033204,0.000100640325,0.91008323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992388,0.00009799008,0.00013478106,0.00020229645,0.00019481461,0.00013130464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995754,0.000044314304,0.00012423775,0.000104932056,0.000058251993,0.000092909046],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016499883,0.00012293752,0.00014756757,0.00020264549,0.00014826638,0.000060492403,0.00006426364,0.00020900766,0.003800653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006962267,0.00011210202,0.000018950017,0.00030935396,0.00014002675,0.0002964515,0.000007550438,0.00017789038,0.000025288145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017517357,0.00022811003,0.0029131505,0.00003123179,0.000056201858,0.0000010793392,0.015006799,0.0000020993334,0.000038938048,0.036899857,0.9309647,0.013840287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015006517,0.00006639659,0.0007576888,0.00003076202,0.00001463808,0.0000012110028,0.0015306136,0.00003658779,0.000017286578,0.0001713624,0.99707663,0.00014677177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023760134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038470794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084759206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041621777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117747084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391348386","doi":"10.51644/9781771121644-006","title":"Civil Liberties in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil liberties; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03986463632364933,"score_gpt":0.3013173707859355,"score_spread":0.2614527344622862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391348386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010961796,0.00005705563,0.0000023183695,0.07379621,0.00074650225,0.00007150308,0.0000068195745,0.00001489407,0.92529374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019063655,0.00014454905,0.00001999268,0.0024913219,0.00025584182,0.000004344302,0.0000027478923,0.000008291107,0.9780093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993548,0.00001855278,0.00015692554,0.00010302072,0.00024235854,0.00012437606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994381,0.00022858937,0.00008330664,0.0001026795,0.00009691507,0.000050416435],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017223036,0.00006931379,0.000085623244,0.00007073473,0.000109606044,0.000047306414,0.00012568326,0.00008692293,0.032334328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016571669,0.000056922403,0.00001633237,0.000038045895,0.000058117977,0.00021402843,0.000012270257,0.00021646766,0.00027379647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.86981e-7,0.0000014423367,0.00006463453,0.0000012910288,0.0000036475947,0.0000011964169,0.001152478,3.225934e-8,1.2725216e-7,0.87687504,0.11774035,0.0041590775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024994415,0.0000011332355,0.00005266944,0.000023453278,0.00000222712,1.216176e-7,0.00045135446,6.7453136e-8,5.688814e-7,0.031107623,0.9682444,0.00009138513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98983276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85050404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007963229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016375104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391481250","doi":"10.1111/jlse.12146","title":"Artificial Intelligence: The Future of Pedagogy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Studies Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Narrative; Focus (optics); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09088942209647546,"score_gpt":0.5082015189304274,"score_spread":0.417312096833952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391481250","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069973506,0.050601356,0.0005452364,0.81876016,0.03154791,0.00019908695,0.0000022995032,0.000019641993,0.028350797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869706,0.0033426518,0.00036172126,0.0004414477,0.0068452065,0.000005329947,6.196519e-7,0.0000047301064,0.002027689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988745,0.00017102277,0.00045739068,0.00006191174,0.0003394177,0.000095775584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980508,0.00047686906,0.00029858117,0.000074946016,0.0010630555,0.00003575979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001584842,0.000055019238,0.000112572496,0.00014252962,0.00034865187,0.00016253143,0.00018126763,0.000039240804,0.00018754856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009597761,0.000035319175,0.00008008845,0.00076132745,0.00021216765,0.0007049839,0.000012819809,0.00037637897,0.00001849026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008835418,0.00009148174,0.000064352615,0.000019898416,0.00007227191,5.828902e-7,0.06691858,0.000005337229,0.000036409132,0.64406174,0.05149319,0.23722729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004564753,0.00003122187,0.00019352125,0.000037540758,0.000040469316,0.000009000346,0.23484503,0.0000024450976,0.00009853428,0.020834835,0.74387175,0.000031087777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039839323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062614604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9169971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014499098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040179216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71276206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391548379","doi":"10.4000/cjm.2356","title":"About the book: American Legal Education Abroad: Critical Histories, New York University Press, 2021","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers Jean Moulin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"History; Media studies; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.029884026147714418,"score_gpt":0.3513503130377229,"score_spread":0.3214662868900085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391548379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030359349,0.0010395074,0.00052718096,0.4396956,0.004419849,0.0003310858,0.00001866924,0.0002526372,0.55067956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08602045,0.0006133764,0.0007569908,0.005492836,0.0020836822,0.000008817617,0.00007271537,0.000019333409,0.9049318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987074,0.0003614915,0.0001404747,0.00021445681,0.0003005094,0.00027565737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983773,0.00080978277,0.000099977915,0.00025921484,0.00019080857,0.0002628661],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052986556,0.0000887525,0.00009586933,0.00008847608,0.0013480479,0.00022996536,0.0003472471,0.00008333771,0.0007181966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045725373,0.000087108194,0.00005199655,0.0014502378,0.001099159,0.00065654627,0.00002324204,0.00049120066,0.0002112711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008025314,0.000025110381,0.000052523228,0.0000018062541,0.0000055874334,7.1260325e-7,0.015205424,0.0000035255164,0.000004412367,0.4123055,0.561044,0.011343358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057306188,0.000013864271,0.00024774324,0.000005048148,0.000020791716,3.4162886e-7,0.06085304,0.000017198907,0.0000063145335,0.00045918763,0.9382132,0.000105940664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029904721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010675326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43420276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042771225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004084943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391689434","doi":"10.51644/9781554581368-002","title":"Introduction","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.09573603254790712,"score_gpt":0.40748228110042256,"score_spread":0.3117462485525154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391689434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.8833162e-7,0.00002770006,0.00019443924,0.11154599,0.0018717427,0.00008154979,9.90466e-7,0.000078391735,0.88619894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00009961131,0.00010869183,0.0006365782,0.0015445527,0.007735977,0.0000012380572,0.000023270863,0.000009754557,0.9898403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993969,0.000010642222,0.0001354904,0.00012559527,0.00023627217,0.00009506801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994093,0.000075176344,0.000100359015,0.0001227343,0.00024329606,0.000049098264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059936184,0.00006224443,0.000060622027,0.00012856867,0.00026917216,0.00009182709,0.00007741151,0.00019581047,0.08276815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023717235,0.0000640959,0.000032042608,0.000056148816,0.0001088667,0.0002525781,0.000007007259,0.00036771232,0.0035870213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.329938e-7,0.0000028794805,3.9322754e-7,6.4424046e-7,0.000004314539,1.8334501e-7,0.0005425404,2.8486696e-8,2.9162328e-7,0.64867544,0.34036988,0.010402637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001322409,0.0000033208407,0.0000027422948,0.00000210229,0.000008831764,4.951645e-7,0.00031067026,7.338114e-8,0.0000016356026,0.031178093,0.9684002,0.00007865948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009021774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002322519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62803024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011888267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005315004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391864576","doi":"10.51644/9780889205796-001","title":"Acknowledgements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06413564997133032,"score_gpt":0.38128741600876764,"score_spread":0.31715176603743733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391864576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[3.5459328e-7,0.000044998913,0.000052443775,0.0102421725,0.001606687,0.00011597738,0.000004119405,0.00007434864,0.9878589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00010858406,0.000045124067,0.00021770895,0.0009076024,0.0013315348,0.000003762677,0.000039335075,0.000011413102,0.99733496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941933,0.000012632721,0.00013565202,0.00011311214,0.00021988912,0.00009938562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920386,0.00006608954,0.00009621376,0.0001165264,0.0004773031,0.0000399973],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002167639,0.000073435134,0.000068989895,0.000082299906,0.00028472455,0.00012673462,0.00012566482,0.00015562664,0.22140165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018857987,0.00007468497,0.000038617465,0.000039659724,0.0000909736,0.00020157298,0.000014738487,0.00023681966,0.03169704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.6665929e-7,0.000004994877,0.0000028716554,8.2569414e-7,0.0000044429835,1.49834e-7,0.00018804746,2.7681349e-8,5.6214905e-8,0.47366056,0.5243093,0.0018286195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024033674,0.0000022190927,0.000010122641,0.000006764935,0.000011370465,3.8366586e-8,0.00007648744,1.5023546e-7,4.7101088e-7,0.035686634,0.96409076,0.000090956266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004341535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003661708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43978152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010159803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006887077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9690569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391870170","doi":"10.51644/9780889209022","title":"Doing Ethics in a Pluralistic World","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.16039589387453212,"score_gpt":0.442063088430732,"score_spread":0.2816671945561999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391870170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.493998e-7,0.00007145042,0.000043897435,0.08890525,0.0007280016,0.00013977269,0.0000026981945,0.00005549413,0.9100529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005902839,0.0001265707,0.0010022423,0.0057440596,0.00057956454,0.000011736285,0.000020147345,0.000011569484,0.99191386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988537,0.00018038615,0.00024139493,0.00015687235,0.0003860922,0.00018158215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978743,0.0016221807,0.0001357817,0.0001335284,0.00017691402,0.00005726853],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011007704,0.000091025686,0.00012189838,0.00034183616,0.00031208814,0.00022961553,0.00018765846,0.00030069822,0.017677905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017433569,0.00009479438,0.000034896148,0.0005601969,0.00013904739,0.00030449347,0.000016830729,0.0020324383,0.0009663901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.6832538e-7,0.000011741036,0.00001011567,0.000007493108,0.000002643966,0.0000013382613,0.012653791,7.916914e-7,4.727897e-8,0.62773764,0.3586205,0.0009536657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039801707,0.0000017930874,0.000014806124,0.0000644457,0.0000073111846,2.1849674e-7,0.00080841477,0.0000033655494,6.536324e-8,0.013527903,0.98540753,0.00012434788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008567234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15562223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62678707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047758728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036008193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391935746","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-95352-2_101-1","title":"Limits of Consent Education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.13035408207445856,"score_gpt":0.4357227866533086,"score_spread":0.30536870457885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391935746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005530783,0.00042867576,0.0000056769327,0.04710458,0.0022768392,0.00014904237,0.0000075485236,0.000045233133,0.94997686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058937264,0.00043576828,0.00021711472,0.0008913471,0.0005018433,0.0000061967407,0.000023162227,0.000011872878,0.992019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993753,0.000012638019,0.00020692595,0.00011915264,0.00022078473,0.00006520227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991122,0.00022851408,0.00013920097,0.00012485085,0.00034818018,0.000047042446],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023928835,0.000071390066,0.00009151345,0.00015089585,0.00008962682,0.00007511144,0.00009539071,0.00015209823,0.011276331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023650938,0.0000694777,0.0000535079,0.00007189549,0.00014583168,0.00012644584,0.000009521454,0.00025447627,0.0013304283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.4181813e-7,0.000015749982,0.000001487851,0.00001950036,0.000014665086,1.11299066e-7,0.0018556622,2.8464084e-8,0.0000026189894,0.80284613,0.19035436,0.004889048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008490961,0.0000049813916,0.0000026307816,0.00006877139,0.00003019829,4.2652175e-7,0.0011405105,1.4101461e-7,0.000008099027,0.14648579,0.85218495,0.00006500611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021925431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023579411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6618306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000828541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062456205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391966643","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_98","title":"Supporting Students with Academic Integrity and Ethical Learning: Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Engineering","score_opus":0.04281682798544876,"score_gpt":0.4437091302942884,"score_spread":0.4008923023088396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391966643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008237849,0.00062867237,0.00011182577,0.0934384,0.005866733,0.00047348317,0.000013846808,0.00011335485,0.89111584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28715748,0.000566009,0.00041345044,0.0003417775,0.0031075047,0.000028964721,0.00010112936,0.000034982022,0.70824873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998035,0.000042249656,0.0004972779,0.00039651827,0.0008711565,0.00015779125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980975,0.00017593736,0.0005698154,0.00013798226,0.0009192289,0.00009953946],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013128867,0.00018512364,0.0001913859,0.00041888125,0.00022391594,0.00024434124,0.0003125843,0.0005412182,0.0010026941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076342426,0.00018272044,0.00005651799,0.00007766746,0.00035130896,0.00029952178,0.000087676206,0.0042591817,0.000061768624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003640351,0.00003606373,0.0016689876,0.000053907752,0.00012767444,5.7552603e-7,0.0070272963,0.0000017906449,0.00006670962,0.9757273,0.0071227546,0.008130494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088317785,0.000043274573,0.00044292968,0.00044558392,0.0001003627,0.0000074693635,0.0021713024,0.0000048376032,0.00010782804,0.04612753,0.950262,0.00019852523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006668897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027514104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94313926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003135999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002007249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391977452","doi":"10.51644/9781554581641-003","title":"Acknowledgements","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Materials science","score_opus":0.07675563662728019,"score_gpt":0.39804449328323727,"score_spread":0.3212888566559571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391977452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.0420244e-7,0.000052030442,0.000015507108,0.022642475,0.0011515949,0.00011611083,0.0000017483281,0.0000748042,0.97594553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000058567643,0.0001676197,0.00031596745,0.0027929887,0.001073533,0.0000018594677,0.000016174981,0.000007709095,0.9955656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942875,0.000013402419,0.00012658795,0.0001136086,0.00021791238,0.00009974236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992037,0.000054753255,0.00008970973,0.000124239,0.00046947063,0.000058127815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024571555,0.00007370653,0.00007268427,0.00008280804,0.00027561106,0.00012539617,0.00014071567,0.00015662235,0.24345466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031101773,0.000074364594,0.000038649563,0.00004066138,0.00006596624,0.00022633688,0.000010023149,0.00026649577,0.03344532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.8503914e-7,0.000005556479,6.377652e-7,5.0308125e-7,0.0000048876173,1.7731233e-7,0.00052409986,6.7462573e-9,6.421748e-8,0.539532,0.42556134,0.034370437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002267482,0.0000048038273,0.000007796095,0.000008274133,0.000010467756,5.0804086e-8,0.000114568626,7.49677e-8,4.1784307e-7,0.0807651,0.9189796,0.00008617794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000645795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012959739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49341825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009440673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007372473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96730727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391984272","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_129","title":"Enabling Ableism: Using Academic Integrity Arguments to Create Disability in Testing Environments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Ableism; Academic integrity; Normative; Misconduct; Cheating; Psychology; Scrutiny; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.13683839216959923,"score_gpt":0.42481589723624114,"score_spread":0.2879775050666419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391984272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06930862,0.00045818966,0.00015772363,0.007838377,0.0070842197,0.0009384733,0.00006790689,0.000055168817,0.9140913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5641671,0.00019553327,0.0032160934,0.0004219655,0.001479744,0.00006933061,0.00007657685,0.000057376248,0.43031633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977985,0.000040202332,0.0007611197,0.0004885963,0.00067949854,0.00023207549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862784,0.00028438657,0.00043558175,0.00024694443,0.0002744298,0.00013080702],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011062475,0.00023071705,0.00023842508,0.0005147392,0.00016246544,0.0001549171,0.00046351514,0.00031920194,0.0007602349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010826848,0.00026842963,0.000083982435,0.00017955112,0.00020862537,0.0005675042,0.00013830586,0.0013459891,0.00013539991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008176654,0.00057277066,0.029542422,0.00019756565,0.00024763547,0.0000027513754,0.020006508,0.00024778803,0.0043828334,0.8897364,0.0012564211,0.05372514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019499249,0.000032393084,0.0042566406,0.00328168,0.00011800654,0.0000030578205,0.002333411,0.00012866729,0.0007280235,0.108968526,0.87935,0.00060461083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070503005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053973944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8780936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018967807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016504293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392544398","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.127563.2","title":"The transparency of quantitative empirical legal research published in highly ranked law journals (2018–2020): an observational study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; University of Sydney; University of Washington; Boston University","keywords":"Open peer review; Plant biology; Observational study; Transparency (behavior); Medicine; Law; Physiology; Political science; Biology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.7599475830901874,"score_gpt":0.6606344309967526,"score_spread":0.09931315209343483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392544398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4854189,0.0016796559,0.000020360021,0.40963492,0.0022454602,0.0033392855,0.00016621801,0.00008735376,0.09740786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915168,0.000423882,0.00035923228,0.00017115888,0.0007143503,0.0006059548,0.000084643565,0.00004156273,0.0060824063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98181933,0.009761306,0.0015495277,0.00082186516,0.005110254,0.0009377109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98615724,0.0076299035,0.00027117768,0.0009741445,0.0046481458,0.00031938218],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.047671873,0.00022747465,0.0004348723,0.000944409,0.001805555,0.003994932,0.0024356314,0.0003862526,0.0015942631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013273014,0.00017742508,0.00014114095,0.0051064175,0.001747519,0.0015144901,0.0007201224,0.0078094085,0.00012657193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003384205,0.0018588947,0.013842775,0.00010148502,0.00020442331,0.00004695284,0.10854329,0.00008426592,0.0000758805,0.80622613,0.06781775,0.0008597081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078694074,0.0006220236,0.11231976,0.0002851085,0.00004817419,0.000002136982,0.14570163,0.00054669695,0.000035510722,0.30359963,0.43560943,0.00044296627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09453396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13157555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5060979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063112366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015189557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393032379","doi":"10.55016/ojs/ajer.v70i1.78940","title":"AJER at 70: Looking Back, Looking Forward","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.11641097436024915,"score_gpt":0.4960558993751016,"score_spread":0.3796449250148524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393032379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10860232,0.0011564366,0.000012694511,0.3370643,0.0022065346,0.00012382626,0.0000018798252,0.000001649368,0.55083036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69296795,0.00030585512,0.00025107234,0.00048806783,0.0024908353,0.000009435253,0.0000062140693,0.000016088146,0.3034645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972612,0.00047766307,0.00045102,0.00017806355,0.0012187351,0.00041327346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97316706,0.024864651,0.00014025219,0.00014719942,0.0014212561,0.00025959226],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038355074,0.00008440804,0.000119651595,0.0006452614,0.00096323306,0.0007142404,0.0004411335,0.00008976739,0.08766753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016183788,0.00007616863,0.00011173011,0.0014399842,0.00029470638,0.0014627317,0.00006379925,0.0009673483,0.004101519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028654196,0.00015735299,0.008573324,0.00003865322,0.00009571518,0.0000013164118,0.024265492,0.000012433693,0.00038363918,0.55659866,0.4078202,0.0020245528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007895724,0.000033590044,0.001293649,0.00013955124,0.000017569644,0.00003378553,0.0040372955,0.000019969088,0.00010425014,0.0062845377,0.987868,0.0000888096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040790588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050805807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5843656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084654195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076135634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393103194","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2024.2.004","title":"Factors affecting legal services' quality: The case of an emerging economy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Business; Industrial organization; Economy; Economics","score_opus":0.10257499020133197,"score_gpt":0.47810169685797765,"score_spread":0.37552670665664567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393103194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94602865,0.000019451338,0.0011385274,0.04350446,0.0014013733,0.000118058044,0.0000025831316,0.00005495099,0.0077319657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956585,0.0000015147135,0.00049497583,0.003589098,0.0001806723,0.0000030982353,9.933143e-7,0.000005156266,0.00006596661],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985348,0.00020456119,0.00029879136,0.0002988182,0.00041668647,0.00024634582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975465,0.0017851336,0.00012511753,0.00029600874,0.00014505677,0.00010220117],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006212503,0.000077010736,0.00008867947,0.00030203932,0.0015025621,0.0015437861,0.00055974716,0.000029280922,0.00019561875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009142176,0.000052213825,0.000051709114,0.0025191898,0.0005623397,0.0043290216,0.000056314293,0.00025517316,0.000028483211],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010913163,0.00008982698,0.0031342288,0.000047112484,0.000024629311,0.00014549225,0.3848698,0.00033811378,0.011190314,0.37228248,0.003007533,0.22485954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013571573,0.00003183589,0.0072003272,0.00009549433,0.00002873683,0.00008521172,0.45991483,0.0029487638,0.0022198898,0.004371844,0.5225709,0.0003964179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011547504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022522004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5195634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103203776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004898349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393860481","doi":"10.32920/22492903","title":"Open Your Eyes: Teaching and Learning about Anti-Asian Racism and the Law in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Law; Political science; Sociology; History; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.043321786593061504,"score_gpt":0.3979782104216819,"score_spread":0.3546564238286204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393860481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07531993,0.00037003242,0.000009164112,0.2044458,0.00068174675,0.0003997269,0.0000035793155,0.000020753703,0.7187493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805028,0.0001604167,0.0003905755,0.0030569383,0.00013853876,0.000034374843,0.000006379572,0.000008645138,0.015701368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825096,0.0009014616,0.00022061451,0.00026479102,0.00019879355,0.00016335188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903953,0.00060997304,0.00011278563,0.0001300334,0.000045992383,0.00006165907],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038092793,0.00010002329,0.0001727996,0.00005480544,0.001087511,0.0021752354,0.00035657172,0.00008848036,0.00018570016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013126647,0.00007295495,0.000014358853,0.00015532662,0.00017511848,0.00030246002,0.0007895592,0.0030379838,0.0000053369076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036025383,0.0000070239034,0.0015290604,0.000026546299,0.000019816081,0.0000031568816,0.107268415,0.000019788224,6.3843004e-7,0.8738879,0.0024731585,0.014760892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022084077,0.0000020016844,0.005155041,0.00011875567,0.000024032759,0.0000021430503,0.2094837,0.00024029292,6.148398e-7,0.023333855,0.7612419,0.00017680843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99880016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99649745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90518284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002126865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047820457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393860482","doi":"10.32920/22492903.v1","title":"Open Your Eyes: Teaching and Learning about Anti-Asian Racism and the Law in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Law; Anti-racism; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.043321786593061504,"score_gpt":0.3979782104216819,"score_spread":0.3546564238286204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393860482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07531993,0.00037003242,0.000009164112,0.2044458,0.00068174675,0.0003997269,0.0000035793155,0.000020753703,0.7187493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805028,0.0001604167,0.0003905755,0.0030569383,0.00013853876,0.000034374843,0.000006379572,0.000008645138,0.015701368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825096,0.0009014616,0.00022061451,0.00026479102,0.00019879355,0.00016335188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903953,0.00060997304,0.00011278563,0.0001300334,0.000045992383,0.00006165907],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038092793,0.00010002329,0.0001727996,0.00005480544,0.001087511,0.0021752354,0.00035657172,0.00008848036,0.00018570016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013126647,0.00007295495,0.000014358853,0.00015532662,0.00017511848,0.00030246002,0.0007895592,0.0030379838,0.0000053369076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036025383,0.0000070239034,0.0015290604,0.000026546299,0.000019816081,0.0000031568816,0.107268415,0.000019788224,6.3843004e-7,0.8738879,0.0024731585,0.014760892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022084077,0.0000020016844,0.005155041,0.00011875567,0.000024032759,0.0000021430503,0.2094837,0.00024029292,6.148398e-7,0.023333855,0.7612419,0.00017680843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99880016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99649745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90518284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002126865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047820457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059229","doi":"10.29173/alr2714","title":"Legal Ethics for Government Lawyers: Confronting Doctrinal Gaps","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10414733711804404,"score_gpt":0.434770047063153,"score_spread":0.33062270994510895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007869231,0.0065683792,0.000039691095,0.30175158,0.00077723805,0.0006979189,0.000015975646,0.000019124116,0.6900514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5107524,0.021208087,0.0028843875,0.3138797,0.0013285032,0.0024170815,0.00014947566,0.000047353788,0.14733306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832267,0.00044905196,0.00027636625,0.00017237192,0.0005618444,0.00021772893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778163,0.0016552163,0.00020865825,0.00017050102,0.000118524425,0.00006544393],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028637196,0.00007392765,0.00015146541,0.000008311263,0.0018163184,0.00013067326,0.00024904302,0.000034130026,0.0032872756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027626026,0.000076578166,0.00008831642,0.00031057687,0.00008412159,0.00041944772,0.000052354502,0.00051541004,0.000050852697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034997151,0.000044619108,0.000025216543,0.00017096994,0.000012878585,3.2755997e-7,0.0018788194,6.792683e-7,0.000002570649,0.94886124,0.04701925,0.0019799126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009467902,0.000025585068,0.0000052975797,0.0001137031,0.00005071875,0.0000029561493,0.0013083308,0.0000024490305,0.0000043997543,0.00051180186,0.9977769,0.00010317369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048355535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022146475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9507577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023327337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006663961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059323","doi":"10.29173/alr2697","title":"Dale Gibson: Scholar, Teacher, Lawyer, and Man of Principle","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04588072467313318,"score_gpt":0.39881674564932956,"score_spread":0.35293602097619636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017318066,0.048750244,0.0000014953247,0.1192245,0.0003549025,0.0006082974,0.0000064817823,0.000023581184,0.8137124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85453546,0.034397356,0.0008300359,0.029751822,0.00019395263,0.000281399,0.000048484802,0.000025334966,0.079936154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885106,0.00043343817,0.0002246735,0.00013466236,0.00023591785,0.00012024429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928194,0.00022449406,0.00015883778,0.00020169829,0.0000714531,0.000061557825],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014881988,0.000055908884,0.0001459239,0.000018733337,0.000793191,0.000043927517,0.00018730154,0.000020429623,0.0057920925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009020984,0.000055286306,0.000036437137,0.0004572385,0.00010999633,0.00040478137,0.00007934726,0.00031765574,0.000038826885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013599131,0.000091342125,0.00095194834,0.00016836914,0.00001090814,3.1915437e-7,0.0017513904,1.4888445e-7,0.000007519992,0.9788204,0.01325603,0.004940282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006104348,0.000015399271,0.00022960607,0.0000796059,0.000028185246,0.0000031753084,0.0003227535,8.306112e-7,0.000003911685,0.000424249,0.99876505,0.00006616072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028132038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066361697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98550904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040167663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023097232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059325","doi":"10.29173/alr2707","title":"The Justice Crisis: The Cost and Value of Accessing Law, Trevor C.W. Farrow &amp; Lesley A. Jacobs, eds. (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2020)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Economics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.04616401634271939,"score_gpt":0.378125591943006,"score_spread":0.3319615756002866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021085009,0.27350268,0.00000991219,0.3327797,0.0020620225,0.0013427278,0.000023413768,0.000022037008,0.39004663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31680483,0.5306868,0.00030606388,0.107618645,0.0008815542,0.0010351327,0.000048125174,0.000060138864,0.042558707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975845,0.0011090025,0.00043095392,0.00021142913,0.00042665025,0.00023741461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603677,0.0028652775,0.00042706556,0.00043390458,0.00016877975,0.00006819952],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021269822,0.00011574718,0.00021390345,0.00000763705,0.0035524217,0.00027671768,0.0006127101,0.0000330129,0.00080036395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017919329,0.00007456603,0.00007771549,0.0005775002,0.0003893606,0.00058511086,0.00015333891,0.00039680634,0.000021230493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043081045,0.00003968355,0.000014184909,0.00022545099,0.000026440748,1.7906443e-7,0.0022556612,0.0000044031913,0.0000015865367,0.5998543,0.388276,0.009297795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007143001,0.000007637653,0.000013870451,0.0001352475,0.00035062566,0.0000029515418,0.0023972085,0.00000571246,0.0000025219879,0.0006611477,0.99625236,0.00009928178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09914363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15702899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6079764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056679753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036033522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395462345","doi":"10.31542/2w47ja34","title":"Gender Roles in Corrections: How Gendered Expectations Impact Female Correctional Officers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MacEwan University Student eJournal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Criminology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05210980819008947,"score_gpt":0.3830669477615962,"score_spread":0.33095713957150674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395462345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78733945,0.00042447614,0.004337227,0.024058659,0.0061418354,0.00042472832,0.00005180574,0.00027625603,0.17694557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857666,0.00013091395,0.0001849426,0.00007937065,0.00031231216,0.0000018076192,0.000013283623,0.000008737286,0.013502068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862105,0.00028726977,0.00013625388,0.00021960174,0.00046961635,0.00026624004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992397,0.00024399497,0.000078731915,0.00008898057,0.00019962997,0.00014899446],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045236098,0.00010893813,0.000102952436,0.0006473459,0.0010811677,0.0006448469,0.00022239707,0.000077869765,0.0017772712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014095026,0.00012048637,0.00011920939,0.0014821285,0.0001185895,0.0012082125,0.00003297619,0.0005807134,0.00009596699],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104319304,0.00085730175,0.29109982,0.000017502183,0.0005582199,0.00018513463,0.552377,0.0023080725,0.0001590208,0.06211423,0.08208858,0.008130811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029913362,0.000028204175,0.110324144,0.000022929353,0.000045528006,0.00001637387,0.6659883,0.0002523001,0.000005223179,0.0001008402,0.22274008,0.00017693012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018472188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009515178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19842711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001267154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021330316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396537686","doi":"10.1515/9782763716992-007","title":"De la judiciarisation à l’innovation : la Coalition des intervenantes et intervenants francophones de l’Ontario pour le secteur de la justice","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05150422054257271,"score_gpt":0.37046392143516976,"score_spread":0.31895970089259706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396537686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078856304,0.0001285853,0.18119046,0.014358833,0.0012379498,0.00031877306,0.000028928787,0.00016087228,0.7237193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8513823,0.00032442246,0.012985208,0.0031498738,0.0006923526,0.000052295065,0.00013930818,0.00006705288,0.13120717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99409604,0.0035374817,0.0009569709,0.00046512397,0.0004058494,0.0005385365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99199295,0.0057204827,0.00097272324,0.0002766972,0.0008741719,0.00016298782],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011454278,0.00042615604,0.0003973653,0.00045667958,0.0011162959,0.0009220997,0.00038469076,0.0010593504,0.0040388713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051332233,0.00045724836,0.00020183685,0.00058124267,0.0013861223,0.0011370018,0.00008040931,0.0020647747,0.0002817626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043030344,0.0002959774,0.004859246,0.00021443125,0.00011500692,0.000008909974,0.046967298,0.00008609724,0.00077910064,0.9197371,0.00807866,0.018815147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006608613,0.00010450589,0.054364916,0.0010543441,0.00031098197,0.0001152778,0.010588727,0.00052824523,0.00043743313,0.24224992,0.6889722,0.0006126098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37251717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16583881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.772526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014963859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064617624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396716094","doi":"10.29173/mlj1109","title":"The Mens Rea of Sexual Assault: How Jury Instructions are Getting it Wrong","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Algoma University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Sexual assault; Jury; Criminology; Jury instructions; Psychology; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.04124937606386976,"score_gpt":0.3316040854850949,"score_spread":0.29035470942122515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396716094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5717738,0.00006465215,0.000051088384,0.18283086,0.004486322,0.00018432012,0.000007325249,0.000031310024,0.24057028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99564564,0.00003900033,0.00040002915,0.00059177994,0.0010122291,0.0000031996863,0.000001417791,0.000008044967,0.0022986818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986783,0.00026437573,0.00024571037,0.00009501412,0.00049138983,0.0002251968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838483,0.00036088168,0.00047738414,0.00015901431,0.00054031814,0.0000775874],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016183214,0.00006801724,0.000092577815,0.000050701987,0.0025771128,0.0006413853,0.0002679179,0.0000745017,0.00031541655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065250753,0.00005240168,0.000038490514,0.00031792186,0.00019261756,0.00091667066,0.000026987764,0.00078705465,0.000056773715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027825661,0.00016323481,0.026187733,0.000024305198,0.00017136367,0.000007196521,0.022062441,0.00004304307,0.0010146187,0.7838869,0.08303835,0.083373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010434618,0.00002044877,0.00406028,0.000014023214,0.00001730919,0.0000286448,0.3101571,0.000007142802,0.0000344636,0.0012179128,0.68427193,0.00006642254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008408619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11734923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78266895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012963045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036924388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396716382","doi":"10.29173/mlj959","title":"The Admissions and Education Committee: A Perspective on Legal Education and Admission to Practice in the Province of Manitoba, Past, Present and Future","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Legal education; Political science; Medical education; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.017290840663946667,"score_gpt":0.35903700455250254,"score_spread":0.3417461638885559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396716382","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08981475,0.0009450479,0.000016527267,0.864851,0.00092474837,0.00056675216,0.0000027329002,0.000007228195,0.042871244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894019,0.0012242935,0.0005710011,0.004515457,0.0034632585,0.000048065685,7.043042e-7,0.000009222574,0.00076610025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843484,0.0006982844,0.00021872595,0.00015066667,0.00034270302,0.00015475998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977475,0.0011829516,0.00024170501,0.00014817524,0.00048338503,0.00019629496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013988048,0.00008953065,0.00007670135,0.00008461688,0.001631277,0.00050554564,0.0001756489,0.0000548144,0.000019311574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013960828,0.000046681605,0.000015836758,0.00023927087,0.00014689477,0.00097115815,0.000034973007,0.00040019755,0.0000027527121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011325168,0.0004863282,0.0008928209,0.000006097097,0.000012578882,0.0000017237262,0.016938413,1.7138791e-7,0.000056798777,0.5384339,0.060593784,0.3824641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010395971,0.00007560215,0.009361643,0.000056081506,0.000013380201,0.000060819442,0.33559048,3.5247245e-7,0.000010630085,0.004630261,0.6500481,0.000048708094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01642703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061828725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89958715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018481308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016483937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396717232","doi":"10.29173/mlj976","title":"Reaching for Excellence: Evaluating Manitoba's Process for Issuing Judicial Authorizations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authorization; Excellence; Process (computing); Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.23816406842901627,"score_gpt":0.5081246659591494,"score_spread":0.26996059753013313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396717232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31993812,0.0002085007,0.12921308,0.2040198,0.024730371,0.004704243,0.00009315734,0.0003246379,0.3167681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98366517,0.000016557537,0.008092991,0.0004930051,0.0071466602,0.0001348835,0.000010795683,0.000025664162,0.00041430138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983574,0.00015110392,0.00040607384,0.00020402677,0.00047127643,0.00041007937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971088,0.00051482284,0.00076883426,0.00021670184,0.0012423344,0.00014848498],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039283275,0.00011866645,0.00014859614,0.00008699209,0.021579385,0.00262696,0.0006160994,0.0001077645,0.00008371976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007238761,0.00012255633,0.00010142137,0.00011666642,0.00019312103,0.0021166161,0.000029829696,0.0005069467,0.000013878905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009948039,0.00021474177,0.00248608,0.000073719864,0.000087262924,0.000002960708,0.029719857,0.00013937769,0.00045382278,0.8224926,0.008031075,0.13619903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012130742,0.00019095345,0.0012381839,0.00018449918,0.00019752733,0.000027974982,0.23424977,0.0015433894,0.00023802195,0.2081233,0.55232966,0.0004636535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019900005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14488554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66372705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022593285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008726182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99840844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396755463","doi":"10.61838/kman.isslp.2.4.6","title":"Legal Education and Social Responsibility: A Qualitative Inquiry into Law Students' Perspectives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Social responsibility; Legal education; Legal research; Sociology; Political science; Legal responsibility; Law; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.10388026298047592,"score_gpt":0.5486944565583513,"score_spread":0.4448141935778753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396755463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6793511,0.00003770239,0.00004857015,0.15546232,0.0006193532,0.00022910611,0.0000017130965,0.00018563356,0.1640645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747184,0.000017940512,0.00053814246,0.0018921951,0.00046107228,0.00005069721,0.000011137721,0.0000061320015,0.022304296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982686,0.0008319482,0.00016020235,0.00022006333,0.00036489268,0.00015431613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879384,0.00064311596,0.00006748667,0.00008865663,0.0003504463,0.000056474924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025908211,0.00006483284,0.0000815084,0.0001466112,0.0012521105,0.00043226618,0.00012910331,0.000065000066,0.0003106083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013275107,0.000065490545,0.000025065445,0.0009333808,0.0005957273,0.0011278008,0.00004966161,0.00018248963,0.0001569515],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008847686,0.0000867974,0.0001808812,0.0000024139315,0.00000723057,1.0600493e-7,0.4855921,1.8992804e-8,0.000015766287,0.5067336,0.0065114256,0.0008608281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064485845,0.000010458843,0.0045294263,0.0000019466931,0.0000053637873,1.7466887e-7,0.7047001,6.3175906e-7,0.00000481037,0.029835336,0.26078358,0.0000636316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02201837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074049677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47689822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016459575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012888071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784733","doi":"10.7202/1111193ar","title":"The Lawyer’s Professional Duty to Encourage Respect for—and to Improve—the Administration of Justice: Lessons from Failures by Attorneys General","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Duty; Administration (probate law); Administration of justice; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Professional responsibility; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.04560010974734654,"score_gpt":0.4368172844004749,"score_spread":0.3912171746531284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038150828,0.0072945496,0.00015798678,0.968288,0.0014197258,0.0019506422,0.0003733205,0.000022033619,0.016678678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8975013,0.0042461175,0.0033616968,0.056834526,0.0012807315,0.0034430944,0.00018806089,0.000035476383,0.03310903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984381,0.0005319845,0.00031711557,0.00018691711,0.00036263454,0.00016321999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983664,0.0009450503,0.00020778479,0.00022974126,0.00016435272,0.000086675864],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023021905,0.00007629988,0.00013322932,0.000012943008,0.0022610254,0.00011915421,0.00032302566,0.00002606272,0.00043281316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013661748,0.000050282488,0.00004823571,0.00036864233,0.00009848288,0.00015517863,0.000069913265,0.00020405688,0.000010094038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014545751,0.00003463038,0.0000082575825,0.00005084263,0.000008965717,1.2740541e-7,0.0011146176,6.323986e-7,0.0003494643,0.61589426,0.37780333,0.0047203363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058701575,0.00005508399,0.00013376362,0.000060176295,0.000057777685,4.910888e-7,0.0012476632,0.0000024703297,0.00007464615,0.0013673662,0.9968707,0.00007118099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004394251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010701126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9114534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006782131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064333266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396855248","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4822943","title":"Access to Justice and the Legal Profession: Three Questions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.033315377125860295,"score_gpt":0.4240276098035888,"score_spread":0.3907122326777285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396855248","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014049422,0.003681142,0.011516356,0.9180144,0.0025496334,0.00031403365,0.000001248848,0.000077418845,0.049796317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799281,0.0021394924,0.000074751304,0.0021276693,0.001473541,0.000026016702,6.2873835e-7,0.000008334032,0.014221517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852014,0.00024510227,0.00015491771,0.00011175433,0.00025109775,0.00071699923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992324,0.0004044997,0.000047661648,0.00008245205,0.00015012355,0.00008286385],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041868053,0.000060874776,0.000063434156,0.00009742431,0.001608301,0.0014780572,0.00028544787,0.000043116426,0.00013194323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010498106,0.000039159237,0.00003241924,0.00071913307,0.00014319763,0.0013369897,0.000038164704,0.0021544416,0.00006854216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017668519,0.000011486288,0.00005819812,0.000003884676,0.000025660624,8.56988e-7,0.0040869974,0.0000029569164,0.0000035602857,0.97167546,0.0052737286,0.018839529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014382561,0.000022836102,0.00033846186,0.000030781128,0.00009418749,0.00007766667,0.01659469,0.00004502064,0.0000011725456,0.37966275,0.60291857,0.00007004315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025293503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030155776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9658786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035906973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009862904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396887557","doi":"10.29173/mlj932","title":"Preface","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.14650702160363455,"score_gpt":0.40119184782631145,"score_spread":0.2546848262226769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396887557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041877385,0.0000654183,0.0002226994,0.06890584,0.0024140603,0.000058502013,6.1827444e-7,0.00004020191,0.8864153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938989,0.0000136219505,0.0010176027,0.0019566882,0.0016030578,0.0000018438145,6.752748e-7,0.0000045051947,0.0015030551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992163,0.00016107214,0.00011852613,0.000048627717,0.00031164094,0.00014382474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992509,0.00005215332,0.00008570676,0.00006335613,0.00034898668,0.00019891886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011461707,0.000035519388,0.00004096105,0.00003110563,0.0008586314,0.00049834175,0.00015253822,0.000034759516,0.00046123407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051070965,0.00003257106,0.000020626663,0.00018886967,0.00008867523,0.00087626255,0.000010916306,0.0003679783,0.00046194225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007344577,0.00006363318,0.001205803,6.85763e-7,0.000010241077,0.000006911078,0.012713043,0.0000078369585,0.000008130507,0.8425555,0.13189363,0.011527211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010233324,0.0000117671825,0.00021938117,0.0000023937475,0.0000044253147,0.000022403789,0.081725046,0.0000015214963,0.000012635995,0.016497178,0.90135795,0.000042958716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042863015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16789965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95202154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014710882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062103535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96351063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396887564","doi":"10.29173/mlj943","title":"Interview with Janet Baldwin","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.05922848863837579,"score_gpt":0.33852892575473514,"score_spread":0.2793004371163593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396887564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026030237,0.00009926904,0.0020859202,0.40423125,0.0014305644,0.00011929806,0.000003166532,0.000055007986,0.56594527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922761,0.00009399184,0.0006476993,0.0043112147,0.000999876,0.0000036627978,4.5809216e-7,0.0000070753163,0.001659958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911505,0.00023478737,0.00014686456,0.00007097286,0.00025635806,0.00017598798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993361,0.00013051004,0.00012002735,0.000084770356,0.00021666744,0.00011188339],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009263573,0.00005294225,0.000061545514,0.00003914566,0.0008050018,0.00032927972,0.0001852851,0.000032186348,0.0032845396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015281732,0.000030344192,0.000025025258,0.00018060901,0.00015684435,0.0009125353,0.000011345948,0.00023405885,0.00041821098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016858212,0.000088242174,0.0015911277,0.0000034651548,0.000036164736,0.00002113552,0.002788446,2.7934055e-7,0.00006741237,0.6928437,0.062227674,0.24031554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017023188,0.000033505057,0.0008951364,0.000045319055,0.000009188787,0.00005910237,0.013644867,1.2102717e-7,0.00002617426,0.0037059626,0.9813439,0.00006643895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007623354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17953536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96624583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114101305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027635094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396887566","doi":"10.29173/mlj933","title":"Modern Legal Education: Towards Practice-Ready Attitudes, Attributes and Professionalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Mathematics education; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.08122609037982864,"score_gpt":0.4156439997433151,"score_spread":0.3344179093634865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396887566","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039754756,0.0010484896,0.0007290703,0.7027082,0.0046597924,0.00030998455,0.000017052016,0.00008436244,0.25068828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859969,0.000309637,0.0019239105,0.0054090153,0.0021312132,0.000021770245,0.0000052366177,0.000013070035,0.0041892263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983321,0.0004035337,0.00029192402,0.00016819527,0.00053407805,0.00027015965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796396,0.00043055014,0.00028746313,0.00013758586,0.0009857246,0.00019470727],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014954304,0.00010831282,0.00011093653,0.00007418534,0.0019955265,0.00076981547,0.00021792535,0.00009765043,0.0006142982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001525273,0.00007577818,0.000034121997,0.00019627437,0.00026191646,0.0036097583,0.000042815886,0.00046704122,0.000109109904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002181049,0.00027557355,0.0011543971,0.0000047544554,0.000033065473,0.0000062599306,0.0020694637,1.5339813e-7,0.00009661337,0.7935891,0.028609354,0.17413944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022752192,0.000023481209,0.0034686392,0.000058493824,0.00002770733,0.00018978343,0.015519512,6.6378425e-7,0.000027326669,0.015824102,0.96450025,0.0001325057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028919596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031545874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94624215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024789968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002614123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396928990","doi":"10.29173/spectrum245","title":"Inspiring Repertoire for Enrichment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spectrum","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Repertoire; Computational biology; Biology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.04316405541703564,"score_gpt":0.41447628551527566,"score_spread":0.37131223009824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396928990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074268924,0.00042409997,0.001667508,0.47299752,0.0031840012,0.00026071595,0.0000046710975,0.00026837725,0.5137662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652526,0.000038353228,0.0006015407,0.00087104994,0.00089228596,0.000042210515,0.0000041257326,0.0000061881005,0.032291643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995604,0.000019045729,0.00007913822,0.00010691604,0.000102056496,0.00013242966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972415,0.00013394319,0.000014866917,0.00006994573,0.000023670444,0.000033426422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003585255,0.000031821215,0.000031772946,0.000057436057,0.00033389672,0.00025026375,0.000065144406,0.000026349984,0.00067524204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002506529,0.000030349674,0.000029096864,0.000335124,0.000031712407,0.0003133113,0.000006580351,0.00009533256,0.0001567762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015199976,0.000013307591,0.0000890749,0.000008036854,0.00000739292,7.6895867e-7,0.007564122,7.980722e-7,0.000067472305,0.9488051,0.034116913,0.009325482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024072644,0.00001042628,0.00012871897,0.000008582397,0.000004816657,4.3578265e-7,0.0015884264,0.000042200394,0.00017433152,0.024161203,0.9738124,0.000044374843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009992948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008979089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111392255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044439605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7393427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398470029","doi":"10.7910/dvn/d9vt8e","title":"Petition of Joseph Curtis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history","score_opus":0.036090899134186886,"score_gpt":0.35419572331732124,"score_spread":0.31810482418313435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398470029","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013863593,5.5944116e-7,0.0000088016195,0.00029712624,0.0017705467,0.0001619911,0.98397946,0.000023733472,0.013743943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000040983345,0.0004735487,0.00028027355,0.0005293269,0.00095986115,0.000013280178,0.9960851,0.00000663459,0.0016109819],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867755,0.00021247783,0.00028638123,0.00020784106,0.00043536996,0.00018036205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983651,0.00016259603,0.00039958293,0.0006024149,0.0003848199,0.00008546542],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007380604,0.0001094898,0.0001570082,0.00017937968,0.00030769117,0.00012786347,0.00046592893,0.00021294288,0.14696124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021896516,0.000119029464,0.00005470321,0.00043959828,0.0003714805,0.0008077296,0.000079121965,0.0003258355,0.06565298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007297498,0.00010524603,0.0000031291495,0.00002899576,0.000021142292,0.0000016493307,0.0006719142,6.0247224e-8,0.000003840591,0.002827221,0.99622756,0.00010194106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008906334,0.000023360242,0.00002366563,0.000041619693,0.000065558575,8.632094e-7,0.00086216565,2.4359903e-7,0.000006196331,0.00016320258,0.9985973,0.00012674248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013856722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0086505525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08130826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008862819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012340964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398603867","doi":"10.7910/dvn/6ftfx8","title":"Petition of John Smith","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.036042854037817006,"score_gpt":0.34975151223747175,"score_spread":0.31370865819965477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398603867","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000074948325,7.872459e-7,0.000010606352,0.00028307977,0.0015596214,0.00015849376,0.97549826,0.000022674107,0.022458956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000025561692,0.00053060584,0.00030188082,0.00046907508,0.00094180135,0.000011893283,0.9956291,0.000006492895,0.0020836126],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874264,0.00020184893,0.00026299962,0.00020255068,0.00041719404,0.00017279082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840015,0.00016026715,0.00037965516,0.0005973037,0.0003805023,0.00008214815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007808569,0.000107057014,0.00015205753,0.00018974235,0.00030257608,0.00012738255,0.00045491723,0.00020150094,0.13338017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019713533,0.000113021226,0.00004975827,0.00044222045,0.00036450595,0.0007385799,0.000074130825,0.00032139328,0.054220665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008915458,0.00008458982,0.0000043724435,0.000036194553,0.00002033923,0.0000015904665,0.0004531053,8.0534655e-8,0.0000012448949,0.0020811565,0.99722844,0.00007998681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090760455,0.000020793052,0.000027956406,0.000046969297,0.00006139513,8.1595374e-7,0.0010198911,3.5603094e-7,0.000004676312,0.00009841018,0.9985057,0.00012227467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010477012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032482604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07915951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007005987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017393036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398762383","doi":"10.29173/mlj854","title":"ACCLE Conference Remarks - Integrating the Dimensions of Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Wildlife Federation","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.0367537016909045,"score_gpt":0.3466146636033609,"score_spread":0.3098609619124564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398762383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23915258,0.00008221208,0.0005765465,0.13133998,0.0026357214,0.0003204933,0.0000013437788,0.000025952437,0.62586516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958258,0.000036337908,0.0011485771,0.0015030056,0.0005455829,0.000013147164,0.0000016054152,0.000004571606,0.00092136266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989743,0.00027964253,0.0002651047,0.00006672116,0.0002685872,0.00014560018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983573,0.00025129263,0.00027703357,0.00012517459,0.00091093674,0.00007825976],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008128641,0.000055566976,0.000069187765,0.000043425596,0.0015868668,0.00066175725,0.00025661045,0.000041982243,0.001816887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077942177,0.00003395998,0.000039585426,0.00026450868,0.00022625882,0.0012973599,0.000022239985,0.00057006674,0.00010882442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019366205,0.00009650117,0.0005973691,0.0000019690967,0.000011786993,2.316517e-7,0.0058538364,0.0000018768255,0.0005183158,0.9173883,0.039171837,0.036356047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006575494,0.000019336145,0.0030070415,0.000040145016,0.000014921584,0.000026109967,0.31164244,0.0000322937,0.00015101515,0.024943698,0.65997905,0.00007820123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19815852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1665159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8924446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007383013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011724796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398762387","doi":"10.29173/mlj877","title":"An Interview with the Chief Justice of Manitoba Keynote","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Editor in chief; Management; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05026398914803384,"score_gpt":0.3419615573648961,"score_spread":0.29169756821686227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398762387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54868585,0.00019754106,0.0017096027,0.20978288,0.0017860548,0.0005097153,0.000003614006,0.00005777416,0.23726697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936339,0.000058131423,0.00078474235,0.004362332,0.0009938567,0.000010952875,0.000001284296,0.000009648866,0.00014511938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986279,0.0004697322,0.00023423778,0.000087943234,0.0003777,0.00020246666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998637,0.00017646785,0.00029104098,0.00018898223,0.0005888873,0.00011761624],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011648415,0.00008038614,0.00009833028,0.000046225043,0.0014303527,0.00065746676,0.0004573475,0.000043172608,0.0011352447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011443487,0.000049455386,0.000038575803,0.00033047935,0.00030271235,0.0014626592,0.000017516519,0.0005716042,0.00015477935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040770632,0.00062680675,0.0022077847,0.000059247555,0.00015536735,0.000011653732,0.032145448,0.000042813444,0.00037018585,0.7577144,0.06390536,0.14272016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002043684,0.00013418501,0.010211279,0.00004382194,0.00010479029,0.00006145388,0.32971197,0.000017936163,0.00006410438,0.0038722302,0.6554436,0.00013026266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.079850145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40536973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7538422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006816104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002496056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398762526","doi":"10.29173/mlj859","title":"Judge Shadowing at the University of Manitoba &amp; Canada's First-Year Law Curriculum","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.023138423896431653,"score_gpt":0.2560430968810438,"score_spread":0.23290467298461218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398762526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58266723,0.00008414965,0.000050335646,0.102492884,0.0018965962,0.00028062402,0.000011360618,0.000026801885,0.31249005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969562,0.000038512288,0.00026286478,0.0013013551,0.0004548689,0.0000010126037,0.0000036696724,0.0000067842147,0.0009747229],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880743,0.00020790256,0.00018290558,0.00010005069,0.0004520629,0.00024963537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887013,0.0001855599,0.00021707515,0.0001626224,0.00042878234,0.00013584446],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055538677,0.00007737713,0.000095489166,0.000025755564,0.00397235,0.00023851923,0.00039983264,0.000053119482,0.0041745994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013439282,0.00006452898,0.00005766212,0.00026483103,0.00029508802,0.0007023323,0.000065088374,0.0004705924,0.00030219727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008835018,0.00011695441,0.032071065,0.000013460879,0.000074323936,0.000012384025,0.0064641754,0.000037201014,0.000032655047,0.44751188,0.5120321,0.001624988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011304361,0.00000585211,0.00575283,0.000013113325,0.000018904579,0.0000134414095,0.106847286,0.0000034993636,0.000008541038,0.0012026897,0.88594043,0.000080357575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99596924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44630918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006350774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064340245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99732435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398762545","doi":"10.29173/mlj870","title":"The Future for Canadian Law Schools","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02770027744032792,"score_gpt":0.32466472859957385,"score_spread":0.2969644511592459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398762545","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061189374,0.00014965564,0.000037151618,0.57358867,0.0041924957,0.00035285307,0.00000475762,0.000018360499,0.41553712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98007476,0.000062194245,0.0006331486,0.011816412,0.0060360115,0.00004628498,0.0000023306566,0.000008312579,0.0013205194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992123,0.000105663144,0.00014559733,0.00005764789,0.00017875133,0.00030001893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998885,0.00016180922,0.00008887126,0.00009225635,0.00050401327,0.00026808737],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081243017,0.00004896415,0.00004314672,0.000027152544,0.00793018,0.002225551,0.00027023588,0.000057694226,0.00065446645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000203341,0.00003450332,0.000041904488,0.00014975375,0.00011004277,0.00095697027,0.0000055021524,0.00050619774,0.0003298727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010005178,0.000005072558,0.00010914747,4.1889106e-7,0.000007715053,3.72142e-7,0.00065355375,2.9395315e-7,0.0000023169027,0.82843703,0.15806592,0.012717166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006158821,0.0000074066998,0.00040063818,0.0000023165305,0.0000046307728,0.000007218951,0.08219478,0.0000017112167,0.000003352349,0.05024585,0.8670239,0.00004660832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9245951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97395587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021973978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009686257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398763350","doi":"10.29173/mlj946","title":"Interview with Lee Stuesser","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.07249293675765017,"score_gpt":0.3569432075876293,"score_spread":0.28445027082997915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398763350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053437937,0.0001150929,0.0030386392,0.42444295,0.0016775494,0.0001336866,0.0000021279739,0.00006456893,0.51708746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930452,0.000095099866,0.0005394864,0.0036452215,0.0009161713,0.0000041541366,2.3888762e-7,0.0000070966553,0.0017473374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991532,0.00021262867,0.00014009635,0.00007031517,0.00025807886,0.00016566998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992894,0.0001194777,0.00011856542,0.00008526484,0.000287542,0.00009973062],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009119819,0.00005133481,0.000060397626,0.000037272814,0.0008790856,0.0003424108,0.00018315579,0.000029355195,0.0023183895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014117264,0.000028810146,0.000025122594,0.00017624079,0.00015369566,0.0010793123,0.000012006081,0.00022942327,0.00033617744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001720547,0.00010935561,0.0025028498,0.0000038178405,0.00004546382,0.000017881093,0.0034942226,2.2017092e-7,0.00008507625,0.76917094,0.04059096,0.18396199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017226633,0.000030132876,0.001091931,0.000047820566,0.0000100976085,0.00003574035,0.018931076,6.544274e-8,0.00004157343,0.0045001553,0.9750741,0.00006501125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056233495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18978746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93960726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010931769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026841066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398763562","doi":"10.29173/mlj950","title":"Common Law Legal Education in Canada's Age of Light, Soap and Water","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"SOAP; Legal education; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01958590949617754,"score_gpt":0.3038333723539593,"score_spread":0.28424746285778174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398763562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7634621,0.000039222832,0.0000059473905,0.07519628,0.0009504303,0.000067212924,0.0000018624173,0.0000043278014,0.16027258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978512,0.000027785534,0.00006899164,0.0012756528,0.0003162028,0.0000023402793,0.000001665784,0.0000041705584,0.00045197795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991888,0.00015248622,0.00022509297,0.00006414411,0.00021038551,0.00015913376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955314,0.00007923783,0.00009090994,0.000066879606,0.00012700891,0.00008284416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048730406,0.000048503527,0.00008170852,0.00004606184,0.00039536555,0.00013554009,0.00010989206,0.000030972133,0.0002509006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041339226,0.000031250325,0.000013621959,0.00008055596,0.00010163839,0.00067597674,0.0000143556435,0.00019609452,0.00000820851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014371755,0.00009923948,0.013209705,0.0000064164924,0.0000108989325,0.000012657802,0.0033239997,3.2628702e-7,0.0020592615,0.9397881,0.005355024,0.036120005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016550372,0.000011521706,0.0072222836,0.000036616086,0.000006285652,0.00002093112,0.019252291,1.5581291e-7,0.0012986957,0.010587267,0.96132666,0.00007177676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99416375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95597166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035037744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001830336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32469377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398770237","doi":"10.29173/mlj937","title":"Interview with Cameron Harvey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.07136191732873463,"score_gpt":0.3463402712592333,"score_spread":0.27497835393049863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398770237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10641869,0.00017861326,0.007290164,0.42297253,0.0028941492,0.00023579755,0.000011427664,0.00009554637,0.45990306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941274,0.00007459141,0.00036723135,0.0032201062,0.00060719636,0.0000033044114,6.914235e-7,0.000006922622,0.00159256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901897,0.00035216426,0.0001432,0.00007166295,0.000244439,0.00016956008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919903,0.00017008945,0.00013417153,0.00008495983,0.00030350705,0.000108220775],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012544392,0.0000518166,0.000062347,0.000036788824,0.0008461014,0.00035561432,0.00017758245,0.000030138084,0.0020050306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026142065,0.00002981886,0.000021916565,0.00019119032,0.00016621762,0.0009992279,0.00001104475,0.00023429471,0.00035521435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048385795,0.00016664459,0.013344983,0.000005541578,0.000071022216,0.000020985433,0.004602722,3.6949294e-7,0.000113163296,0.4951219,0.104547635,0.38195667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016468241,0.000035752546,0.0078074997,0.00004526628,0.000008182784,0.000031581938,0.009074814,8.3791754e-8,0.000032694046,0.001341357,0.9813897,0.00006835699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035342686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5183642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8877087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013187874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030772245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399040456","doi":"10.29173/mlj751","title":"Finally a How-To Book For New Canadian Lawyers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0853993907542193,"score_gpt":0.3417156738794514,"score_spread":0.2563162831252321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399040456","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014542183,0.00011676848,0.0012181684,0.69044745,0.0023238566,0.00039769593,0.000010976639,0.00003837474,0.2909045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90239507,0.00008463975,0.008191953,0.053696055,0.0052260235,0.000020703306,0.000005571557,0.000022005577,0.03035797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991574,0.00006118835,0.00013129564,0.0000906839,0.0002284894,0.0003309278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987843,0.00010277128,0.000078571284,0.00007945279,0.0003008065,0.00065411895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045888088,0.00006302042,0.000071905044,0.000116283285,0.0029304037,0.0004327553,0.000222808,0.00005443511,0.0007109134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000543556,0.00006459701,0.000052285282,0.00026414427,0.000072946634,0.00076944375,0.000006101154,0.00029669938,0.00014428611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010701124,0.000014647459,0.00027663796,9.4239783e-7,0.000012581597,0.000014120516,0.007880969,0.000004642029,0.000008624949,0.1425763,0.8449382,0.0042616194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014562672,0.00003169366,0.0008510812,0.0000054414368,0.00000765032,0.00005833182,0.012419249,0.0000012152088,0.000010213559,0.0016276378,0.9847529,0.000088960995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81369406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99159765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8878529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035350778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042404146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99836767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399040898","doi":"10.29173/mlj823","title":"Leveling the Playing Field: Severance and Access to Justice at the Manitoba Court of Appeal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Severance; Appeal; Economic Justice; Law; Field (mathematics); Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.09842009203479507,"score_gpt":0.39533428635498885,"score_spread":0.2969141943201938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399040898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7293944,0.00040778203,0.00096060964,0.20464107,0.0031025372,0.00026342287,0.0000042392276,0.000015689417,0.061210252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890202,0.00009065806,0.00027626083,0.008663751,0.0018011753,0.000005938498,4.3718367e-7,0.000005956783,0.00013558973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888843,0.00022366822,0.00021810501,0.00006997774,0.00034569186,0.00025415173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858093,0.0007973718,0.00019091138,0.0001191167,0.0002033898,0.00010829623],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001930339,0.00006778074,0.000076146374,0.00003102746,0.003444587,0.00050274056,0.00037632312,0.00004352966,0.00023702772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005689502,0.000042461175,0.000028627524,0.00024750308,0.0001299583,0.0010041622,0.00009804776,0.00047939763,0.000029671448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002177525,0.00028535593,0.11165457,0.00008629441,0.00019648635,0.000007786411,0.146151,0.00027052552,0.0006572698,0.42803103,0.20605442,0.10638752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015472062,0.00001944713,0.026819479,0.000037110018,0.00008639018,0.000085287495,0.15937407,0.000017623084,0.00020812829,0.0010749775,0.8119959,0.00012685625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024648372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18377827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6059415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008954019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011641906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399041162","doi":"10.29173/mlj806","title":"Making the Transition from Lawyer to Lawyer-Politician in Canada: An Exploratory Study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Political science; Law; Exploratory research; Sociology; Chemistry; Social science","score_opus":0.1313090917444048,"score_gpt":0.38072611360165726,"score_spread":0.24941702185725245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399041162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555265,0.000039097355,0.00005637158,0.027050156,0.0017847058,0.00021812206,0.000007044453,0.000012163139,0.0153058395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889531,0.000002088386,0.000092187925,0.00871904,0.0021950342,0.000017085338,0.0000020327063,0.000008963423,0.000010446794],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811554,0.0007656987,0.00024853478,0.00008882134,0.00043331223,0.00034806362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930143,0.0001551008,0.000090279325,0.00012995889,0.00013192739,0.00019130127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015015333,0.0000748928,0.000086175,0.000054242675,0.0012677587,0.00032041752,0.00023859933,0.000029949795,0.00041759625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010707631,0.00006171614,0.00001812627,0.0003178372,0.000041492814,0.0014847176,0.0000128114125,0.00052462344,0.000037454443],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004284078,0.0009177016,0.08100179,0.0000023229554,0.000055042496,0.00003658187,0.709056,0.000094131356,0.000039533963,0.18927416,0.008670084,0.0108097615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012629028,0.000019045117,0.05447445,0.000009255596,0.00001521059,0.0000033736378,0.78437746,0.0000031082354,0.000007581654,0.0010505415,0.15982193,0.000091786875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18822362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095528865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013687456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97507024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399061067","doi":"","title":"Ontario, listen up: Citational practices in the Ontario Court of Appeal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06053087046219204,"score_gpt":0.3358833500697974,"score_spread":0.2753524796076054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399061067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36232254,0.000029241346,0.00033404917,0.14871503,0.0002598603,0.0002499078,0.0000068035633,0.000051892315,0.48803067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8996042,0.000042249278,0.0026410392,0.00030168158,0.00002455395,0.00004359298,0.00013382951,0.0000073546935,0.097201504],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491405,0.0036936384,0.00035708727,0.00022589831,0.000584367,0.00022495145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318016,0.0043205526,0.00057168904,0.0005011751,0.0013648191,0.00006160747],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012039586,0.00008906382,0.00011612095,0.000185721,0.0005712997,0.0003106173,0.00069561054,0.00008167677,0.0013753037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061439974,0.00008259725,0.00005972645,0.0013967049,0.00025447042,0.00066230225,0.000072960305,0.0004563497,0.00013371104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008814763,0.00027476295,0.06068527,0.000008610282,0.000016235665,0.0000012805905,0.477784,0.0000056398726,0.00008449631,0.44518843,0.012802821,0.0031396286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024998898,3.78288e-7,0.19495657,0.00008425778,0.000013664203,0.0000018648657,0.01290225,0.00010729069,0.00015501499,0.0033203987,0.7880963,0.00011203337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71813965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9703873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77529347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024267043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024083026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399082793","doi":"10.29173/mlj953","title":"Excerpts from Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Canadian Bar Association Held at Winnipeg, Manitoba","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Library science; Bar (unit); History; Gerontology; Geography; Medicine; Psychology; Meteorology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021882381674789942,"score_gpt":0.2699327632651236,"score_spread":0.24805038159033366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399082793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82475495,0.000017327468,0.0000015034402,0.08921283,0.0015216179,0.00015924757,0.00005375147,0.000008156493,0.084270604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698824,0.000014596677,0.00009068142,0.0008710211,0.0009625434,0.0000033010756,4.879286e-7,0.000009084488,0.0010600653],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834985,0.00016532459,0.00035898466,0.000104401144,0.0007470427,0.0002744007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754477,0.00030783177,0.0008776234,0.00010451253,0.0010469522,0.00011833029],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015193577,0.000082912586,0.00011420228,0.000051145485,0.0022589099,0.00017673147,0.0005143676,0.00011880998,0.00036082257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00184901,0.000046708064,0.00009817074,0.00036132804,0.00018675401,0.0007227928,0.000060183094,0.0003779651,0.000022416905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025220865,0.00008983999,0.77089846,0.000010129963,0.00015405728,9.973797e-7,0.024774445,0.0000032825005,0.0037944429,0.12590675,0.06760421,0.006738183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035142165,0.00002028416,0.31423104,0.00018913139,0.00007342066,0.000007621116,0.06527597,0.0000016694588,0.0025358337,0.007934321,0.60922974,0.00014954312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8196226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54162556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014042958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009302508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399158051","doi":"10.1515/9780889779426-003","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Regina Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.06723774102350238,"score_gpt":0.2873177597681832,"score_spread":0.2200800187446808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399158051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004679058,0.000017340477,0.00005585914,0.035523646,0.00066239835,0.00013603986,0.00001298238,0.00010467053,0.9634824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00012796657,0.00023295118,0.00015547138,0.000026605963,0.00054713624,1.0944856e-7,0.000017465696,0.000011254206,0.99888104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941194,0.000035587524,0.00005189391,0.00016664807,0.00023683801,0.00009710619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991537,0.00008273182,0.000233629,0.00020394786,0.00027706742,0.000048925354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023087543,0.00007611722,0.0001181897,0.00013709998,0.00032734862,0.000026769167,0.000217861,0.00018853147,0.00037145166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007527173,0.00010395856,0.00006276941,0.00001675492,0.0003871098,0.00014541068,0.0000433993,0.00030528285,0.00012618683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006525655,0.0000023027421,3.624725e-7,0.000009823656,0.000021613938,0.000002400686,0.003369708,5.31106e-7,0.0000015428961,0.68988496,0.30357778,0.0031224207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006027868,0.000009404272,0.0000023418502,0.000024112931,0.000049595234,3.7926463e-7,0.0010099591,8.734936e-7,0.000005417213,0.0040564537,0.99468535,0.0000958244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003977082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014005967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6911076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082269435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042658162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6012185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399201298","doi":"10.29173/wclawr114","title":"When Pleas Precede Evidence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal; Ontario Tech University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.13342610207671493,"score_gpt":0.45152483572721663,"score_spread":0.3180987336505017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399201298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008881902,0.114510424,0.00029372735,0.52622205,0.002024793,0.00063181965,0.000002728715,0.0002637498,0.3559619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6904774,0.21571852,0.00028778464,0.037182458,0.0019054306,0.0003464482,0.000015374699,0.000033196302,0.05403342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852186,0.0005594471,0.00025980908,0.00018459145,0.00030857784,0.0001657209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986495,0.000715466,0.00007876837,0.0002850009,0.00020845549,0.00006280715],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025978007,0.000082396895,0.0001120289,0.000025369423,0.000680229,0.00040975137,0.000273716,0.00004230801,0.0076801307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001149464,0.00005712406,0.000056667057,0.00070195366,0.00022179063,0.001326731,0.00002380611,0.00033546088,0.002925432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013125616,0.0000087688,0.000007474297,0.0003221728,0.00001531521,3.157678e-7,0.002626819,4.1304202e-7,0.000010382306,0.8908552,0.09439134,0.011760488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013767269,0.000009368953,0.000042162206,0.0019303568,0.000096698604,0.0000049785835,0.00024259977,0.000012413339,0.0000071992386,0.003655508,0.9939083,0.000076657976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005410203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002370921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89951694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012171295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055554364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399451141","doi":"10.1108/s1479-354720240000015004","title":"From the Coleman Case to Disability Justice: An Examination of Discrimination by Association","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Economic Justice; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.05949295651322526,"score_gpt":0.39904601818751717,"score_spread":0.3395530616742919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399451141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047134287,0.000045462057,0.00015787249,0.074556544,0.0013838066,0.0006651449,0.00058472843,0.00007689706,0.9178161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42765215,0.000022010769,0.0001128532,0.00055836607,0.0007657893,0.000026738124,0.00046697434,0.00001709125,0.570378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836516,0.00020024902,0.00039227438,0.0002952421,0.00062125135,0.00012581117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729776,0.0014366383,0.00034734845,0.00028208614,0.0005513319,0.00008484927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020216089,0.00013469705,0.00014782311,0.000052074076,0.00045231273,0.0003121904,0.00019354241,0.00027548565,0.0026906037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015870868,0.0001099906,0.00005724346,0.00017758698,0.00013053314,0.0006189655,0.000034176115,0.0003879297,0.00015695623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003596785,0.00007919982,0.000026493777,0.000023876213,0.00003860182,0.0000017772802,0.045242365,0.0000010455198,0.00001807116,0.86184883,0.077338554,0.015377601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005695832,0.00004045887,0.0005943956,0.000045567875,0.00048164005,0.00000106196,0.03546201,0.000031567586,0.000020324984,0.035250325,0.9278057,0.00020994888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022239525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049468096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8504672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008408439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028043977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399635341","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4862423","title":"Reviewing the Legal Curriculum; Insulating Decolonizing Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04025329190328831,"score_gpt":0.375147046347194,"score_spread":0.3348937544439057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399635341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085589,0.08946109,0.00690898,0.35033643,0.012715859,0.0018392927,0.000007737289,0.00041515753,0.45272648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97463447,0.012818698,0.0007504548,0.0006502248,0.0040421383,0.00005827537,0.000011032356,0.000037789672,0.00699691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958732,0.0007960286,0.00057086506,0.00032763786,0.000616293,0.0018159446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849045,0.00023046619,0.00055708125,0.00027325496,0.00035996278,0.00008879917],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012716556,0.00021659078,0.00024137142,0.00017690424,0.0021698622,0.0020086586,0.0008144566,0.00023590749,0.00007157991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021825056,0.00015867333,0.00024266214,0.0008657353,0.00012908361,0.00044540525,0.00033666703,0.018423893,0.00008708203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014969677,0.000049593193,0.00019493756,0.00004204724,0.00015409265,0.0000014968871,0.008610708,0.00012182127,0.0000027089293,0.96614236,0.0013603528,0.023318375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007798614,0.000018595516,0.00004336374,0.00024310137,0.00020454552,0.00015417337,0.05313633,0.0004956586,9.234969e-7,0.44302186,0.502297,0.0003064505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063697123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004467295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8890455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002555523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031599056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400033339","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4872160","title":"Just Friends? Managers' Connections to Judges","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028452641686526302,"score_gpt":0.3848042118545272,"score_spread":0.3563515701680009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400033339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02747077,0.0019346856,0.011940474,0.5900041,0.0040034284,0.00021108527,0.0000038173353,0.00025314375,0.36417854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442544,0.0011465141,0.00013022328,0.0012244977,0.0012760899,0.000011417054,0.0000021481264,0.000012308941,0.051942393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981971,0.00012423353,0.00016619374,0.00014503954,0.00025392842,0.0011135201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942607,0.00017550119,0.00003929553,0.000091637405,0.00014195358,0.00012556222],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022583646,0.00007040718,0.00006472818,0.00026998232,0.0010423368,0.0006741183,0.00019942752,0.00005340776,0.0010794483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004737612,0.0000674625,0.00006091316,0.0011849712,0.00005212034,0.0007937509,0.000014178752,0.0018738782,0.00089529407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030877743,0.000021693539,0.000080926344,0.0000017320145,0.00006217673,0.0000019232682,0.0069690035,0.0000073116507,0.000020522759,0.96127766,0.01790899,0.013644984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041732328,0.0000372192,0.00007935643,0.0000083173145,0.000029892655,0.0000450266,0.058506645,0.0000069916305,0.000005546544,0.12240824,0.818748,0.000083031344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013077634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013626677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91678363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011124975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074497242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400074015","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714","title":"Ethics in Action","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.1387402024820857,"score_gpt":0.3685301943446637,"score_spread":0.229789991862578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400074015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014949233,0.000088805915,0.000091590286,0.0011478143,0.0005739387,0.00016942149,0.000008532287,0.000048214235,0.99785674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00018828746,0.0002170017,0.00018060487,0.00011607327,0.000101905935,2.3249686e-7,0.000019914682,0.000007990705,0.999168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991493,0.00018014965,0.00010917335,0.00015550142,0.00030035086,0.00010553065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992355,0.00029836714,0.0001253697,0.00012862911,0.0001653931,0.000046740828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005229115,0.000075957105,0.00012323109,0.00019115295,0.00018968475,0.000039705537,0.00021457876,0.00047303207,0.0002381847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012308756,0.00010174906,0.000059709044,0.000036812897,0.0002925439,0.00017066614,0.00005213516,0.0014572734,0.00003730713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014278282,0.000012383081,0.0000014551022,0.00008703928,0.000021128018,0.000011909271,0.034497056,7.4917216e-7,0.0000026929392,0.926597,0.033404462,0.0053498712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007100978,0.0000072778885,0.00000879155,0.00012497649,0.00004370715,3.20638e-7,0.0013125774,0.000009525374,0.0000051519337,0.0067553087,0.99156713,0.00009423377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030378861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03528491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95816267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029072864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003598531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98231864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400074114","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-035","title":"4.6 Will Women Judges Really Make a Difference?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.036500431947484445,"score_gpt":0.26861616363250734,"score_spread":0.2321157316850229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400074114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000974421,0.00012244309,0.000057105317,0.00094779005,0.00036415516,0.00023650724,0.00004277684,0.00010577569,0.998026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001304008,0.000230227,0.00018066887,0.00016526155,0.00012914104,7.1444015e-7,0.000020709258,0.00001733791,0.9979519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989429,0.000047265366,0.00015602095,0.00026463834,0.00038529985,0.00020386503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990107,0.00014571201,0.00020170303,0.0002571242,0.00024380999,0.00014097376],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024121093,0.0001553845,0.00023066677,0.00017016495,0.0003082898,0.000081919905,0.00040697335,0.0003110348,0.001411321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041903517,0.00018381355,0.00010100871,0.000019074721,0.0005261042,0.00016202033,0.00013118882,0.0005748219,0.000052171676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026383701,0.000011692448,0.0000023640448,0.00004713993,0.0000940837,0.000021639866,0.026053945,9.6863815e-8,0.0000049030114,0.9591066,0.00277897,0.011852187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009851532,0.000026398153,0.00001871124,0.0000809228,0.00008218756,9.2856044e-7,0.001365077,0.0000033031408,0.000001897309,0.04791329,0.9502284,0.00018039197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007019912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044692657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9474494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023317133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008891376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400230632","doi":"10.35774/app2024.01.046","title":"Ethical principles of judges’ activity: Canadian experience","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aktual’ni problemi pravoznavstva","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.10161325328550269,"score_gpt":0.42509642246583385,"score_spread":0.32348316918033115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400230632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14901158,0.00044512088,0.00018090336,0.275764,0.001790348,0.00064163504,0.00003489218,0.00027383486,0.5718577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98436546,0.0001513138,0.0011108314,0.0017043315,0.00027786946,0.00009196,0.000009631667,0.000021706413,0.012266867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978899,0.0003534555,0.0003485132,0.00037647175,0.000548887,0.00048278336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982678,0.00053917844,0.000114850234,0.0004316965,0.00031660602,0.000329827],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019128887,0.00014462264,0.0001733016,0.00029627755,0.0005569449,0.00037758978,0.0005308215,0.00035960734,0.0024270732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003733751,0.00014312162,0.00006618855,0.0014171809,0.00046950416,0.0010090364,0.00007403313,0.0011977484,0.00029621835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007742543,0.000058576323,0.0021005326,0.000066063934,0.00003675915,0.000010881255,0.09981166,0.0000075066114,0.0010346366,0.8651942,0.021495786,0.010175646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066719585,0.000028781706,0.0012142486,0.00007322114,0.000018819836,0.0000058669034,0.0067585954,0.00005434095,0.0008892745,0.0023493129,0.9883476,0.00019321823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26880223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21721435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96685183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032954258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006463519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400444530","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2024.12574symposium","title":"Dealing with the Aftermath of Critical Justice Events","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04386761184615806,"score_gpt":0.40758210244590126,"score_spread":0.3637144905997432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400444530","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08726313,0.00032711093,0.0005142872,0.50320244,0.00023426324,0.0004345448,0.0000029393295,0.00009724406,0.40792406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99521595,0.00011543013,0.0011124574,0.0010811383,0.00010987176,0.000019832198,2.6319526e-7,0.0000060233074,0.0023390148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992213,0.000011368831,0.0001590951,0.00011334297,0.00036841133,0.00012647436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996127,0.00018129779,0.00006666693,0.000024335151,0.000085731874,0.000029271745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088603864,0.00005134125,0.000060718405,0.00008939801,0.00018915959,0.00007012685,0.0002207801,0.000037546644,0.00010539404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015263808,0.00003618805,0.000021356404,0.0005386269,0.00019975993,0.00070104457,0.00003708245,0.00021126722,0.000013572631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072110033,0.000024325085,0.000090172005,0.0004350497,0.000030974603,2.3911963e-7,0.00812197,7.1804334e-7,0.000041184256,0.97984546,0.008684292,0.0027184284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008437047,0.000023881397,0.003013426,0.00025411684,0.0003749198,0.0000013869229,0.035693765,0.000058608795,0.00026708774,0.012080071,0.9480485,0.00009991186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004278333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014486742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019679886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034738736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14757058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400457089","doi":"10.5553/elr.000265","title":"Including the Forgotten Party in Legal Education: Victims of Crime","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Premise; Victimology; Presentation (obstetrics); Work (physics); Law; Criminology; Political science; Legal education; Legal profession; Psychology; Sexual abuse; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.10556451079887637,"score_gpt":0.46031927280052026,"score_spread":0.3547547620016439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400457089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004297628,0.011975662,0.0000041500516,0.32447076,0.0013261684,0.00071329845,0.0000034183518,0.0000715959,0.65713733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93688875,0.025876842,0.00025222442,0.026353458,0.00055260176,0.00026254688,0.00003558374,0.0000145959,0.009763383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988644,0.00030923262,0.00032409662,0.000110823006,0.00023308098,0.00015834952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909264,0.00034549777,0.0001509296,0.00020954837,0.00016362713,0.00003774499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002166952,0.00005809641,0.00014236273,0.000048037055,0.00038138422,0.00006333919,0.00023914015,0.000032384156,0.0006051188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010983754,0.000043252032,0.00004888524,0.0018603426,0.00012076894,0.00050202606,0.00003398571,0.00020627417,0.0003147066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.3511296e-7,0.000044269687,0.00044001,0.00015091592,0.00000493288,3.161907e-7,0.0030349256,5.086203e-7,0.000006246704,0.92190593,0.065715544,0.008695681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033139113,0.000003901735,0.0015199255,0.0004046318,0.0000133820895,6.955842e-7,0.0011459272,0.0000015903692,0.000008421131,0.002216285,0.99459887,0.00005324714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076698824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027485352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93259114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060480892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010580085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482627","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v3i1.70480","title":"Further Contemplations: Inaugural Canadian Symposium on Academic Integrity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.09590031357412092,"score_gpt":0.38401641284991117,"score_spread":0.28811609927579024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482627","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05281368,0.00019271974,0.000016683229,0.65741783,0.0008596282,0.00060988317,0.00027744623,0.00012873902,0.28768337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433709,0.00030847694,0.000067094545,0.051961552,0.0015217962,0.00005996988,0.000043637076,0.000034855333,0.0026317507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662864,0.0006819476,0.00047513552,0.0007254835,0.0005340329,0.0009547525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99578154,0.00055980106,0.00020280284,0.00030395007,0.00064821757,0.002503662],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013496188,0.00032792622,0.0003029879,0.00068798556,0.0014152866,0.00020197002,0.0008842778,0.0011434148,0.0026607586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008649716,0.00034412416,0.00012919519,0.0014893262,0.00058158947,0.0009827655,0.000020290196,0.013930692,0.0014843625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004311965,0.000023144805,0.0043094484,0.0000051276693,0.000039115806,0.000009248663,0.16234939,0.000008330586,0.000058752317,0.7180703,0.11426868,0.00081529835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002748207,0.00010239298,0.006068023,0.00006902741,0.00002303909,0.0000036750341,0.19665244,0.00008934027,0.000048678412,0.0033473438,0.79285157,0.00046962165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.937283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92656785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89055717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053432966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016683977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482650","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v1i2.54599","title":"Academic Integrity across the Canadian Landscape","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Academic integrity; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.06921980362017723,"score_gpt":0.41968069194922264,"score_spread":0.35046088832904543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482650","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13879737,0.00030891356,0.000010658591,0.43298644,0.0018520126,0.00048348642,0.00020970269,0.000095653726,0.42525578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690665,0.00024283552,0.00005400298,0.019938467,0.0030644585,0.00004482059,0.000016528542,0.00002362002,0.0075487792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673355,0.0006055305,0.00035117945,0.0005474737,0.0005148199,0.0012474678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644303,0.0005088312,0.00016442878,0.00045152268,0.001065532,0.0013666559],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037615402,0.0002476965,0.00019982386,0.0003981285,0.0052958694,0.00036633923,0.0013007282,0.0011186203,0.0033583976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089553185,0.00020424087,0.00009885309,0.0015908508,0.0020085438,0.000774135,0.000033388984,0.0136230225,0.001600334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013667393,0.000011946768,0.008964425,0.0000015444059,0.000025451383,0.0000030192025,0.19400908,3.1753137e-7,0.000007158581,0.6210366,0.1737377,0.0021890798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010593959,0.0000315682,0.018750686,0.000024830795,0.000010819088,0.0000061783894,0.20980988,0.000024721301,0.000023638338,0.005644899,0.7653263,0.00024052484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8302691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043733385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02128379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482663","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v1i1.43396","title":"Writers’ Guide for Prospective Contributors to Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Engineering","score_opus":0.058236347591171404,"score_gpt":0.414101091612303,"score_spread":0.3558647440211316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482663","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11397088,0.0004017731,0.00032112896,0.52129346,0.0032480168,0.004311025,0.0020390681,0.00029741222,0.3541172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96367306,0.00018216265,0.00063278904,0.020731734,0.003803679,0.00038596033,0.000042185096,0.000064656335,0.010483786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949207,0.00057189586,0.00065477006,0.0013792266,0.00067371223,0.0017997089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918166,0.0010573443,0.0002714026,0.0005767868,0.003527716,0.0027501406],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034227017,0.0005230867,0.00049974275,0.0017563079,0.0029691537,0.0003254098,0.0012827428,0.0013646724,0.0015293971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030701177,0.0005476357,0.00022445903,0.0021032516,0.0012924274,0.0009791156,0.00003771679,0.008742689,0.00094054546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011168632,0.00004718331,0.0020448975,0.0000035241642,0.00006275998,0.0000031727777,0.18621719,9.641161e-7,0.000046478304,0.6159181,0.1946936,0.00085044274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039161718,0.00035839214,0.007962089,0.00009782746,0.000031429492,0.0000038736644,0.32918164,0.00001741811,0.00016742953,0.007247916,0.6539895,0.0005508636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9291335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96596426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8497022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020589955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021975806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482694","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v3i1.69836","title":"Building a Regional Academic Integrity Network: Profiling the Growth and Action of the Academic Integrity Council of Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Humber Polytechnic; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Profiling (computer programming); Research integrity; Political science; Data integrity; Engineering ethics; Computer security; Computer science; Engineering; Public relations","score_opus":0.18668153063169607,"score_gpt":0.3766295742645745,"score_spread":0.18994804363287843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6926319,0.0008381054,0.00012129648,0.2908221,0.0007634336,0.0008493228,0.000060878676,0.000049405353,0.013863571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115765,0.00069756823,0.0004497853,0.0062181735,0.0009822106,0.000032523945,0.0000039897045,0.000018610433,0.0004395001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963944,0.00082983676,0.00067223975,0.00054154044,0.0009770652,0.00058493484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649286,0.001003533,0.0006655987,0.0002682309,0.001125432,0.00044435108],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003977318,0.00026812218,0.00035582366,0.00012921408,0.0010963504,0.00005498889,0.001088364,0.0010441178,0.00014948922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013353842,0.00019672241,0.00015498274,0.0014301034,0.0015008613,0.00076683174,0.00009653017,0.023421504,0.0000060199595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010320496,0.000020222005,0.038341664,0.000030345298,0.00006135166,4.8397294e-7,0.18469106,0.000013688568,0.00093041564,0.76505476,0.010096652,0.0006561602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009802581,0.00022174863,0.10645003,0.0008384087,0.00028540613,0.000032041055,0.3801962,0.00060091197,0.0030286657,0.08372721,0.4225787,0.0010603986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7388399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5488323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6813275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005858681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03851323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99795765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482718","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74178","title":"An Aggie's Approach to Restorative Academic Integrity Practices","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Academic integrity; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14168541956183156,"score_gpt":0.46013509656266066,"score_spread":0.3184496770008291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14179796,0.00056542316,0.00033889516,0.30828705,0.001233271,0.0007264981,0.00015645706,0.00019510537,0.54669935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97523254,0.00045662117,0.002727126,0.01383044,0.0015319972,0.00010203857,0.000059921575,0.000030937084,0.006028371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953679,0.0017567322,0.00043205832,0.0009720569,0.00066899153,0.0008022484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951494,0.0007121739,0.00043526434,0.0005570191,0.0016141806,0.001531961],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030725442,0.00028606938,0.00029903481,0.00057439855,0.001418829,0.0003620475,0.00095828617,0.0010200742,0.0008634058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032195996,0.0003050495,0.000092691946,0.002353895,0.00048222745,0.0024102246,0.00004044526,0.013759218,0.00041627046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034555018,0.0001526592,0.0018847804,0.000005283877,0.000033647288,0.00000878805,0.19018489,0.000008027701,0.00024813524,0.756376,0.049697537,0.001365686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011911119,0.000054995173,0.0039924914,0.000037871567,0.00002227932,0.000012912164,0.45977044,0.000041670675,0.00015773629,0.0046814946,0.5307563,0.00035271223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38907567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3030837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8334346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037124825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019320775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482781","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.77848","title":"Reflecting on Creating a Culture of Academic Integrity at the University of Manitoba: CSAI 2023 Greetings","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10431843480409665,"score_gpt":0.40712216651902267,"score_spread":0.302803731714926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6639776,0.0001644563,0.0000049655428,0.05283624,0.00040160443,0.00037664405,0.0001313672,0.00008064063,0.28202647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98687017,0.0006895202,0.000062959625,0.0008167884,0.00032238165,0.0000038617823,0.000015200207,0.000013185165,0.011205944],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780935,0.00058915064,0.00030626735,0.00038195358,0.00046052414,0.0004527752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974117,0.0011018506,0.00039846334,0.00025041134,0.0005879017,0.00024967198],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002681755,0.0001634617,0.00022335388,0.00038701625,0.0016281365,0.000025532117,0.0006705598,0.0006101256,0.0005566355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009875032,0.00014505787,0.00011880299,0.002166567,0.00077990553,0.0003262181,0.0000642134,0.006870266,0.00020843268],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010782545,0.000040673345,0.016797714,0.00003117259,0.00007715854,0.000006808058,0.49210894,0.000021683822,0.0011437982,0.37200075,0.11557832,0.0020851393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001718106,0.000067491266,0.022342717,0.00022515065,0.00003063968,0.0000024373626,0.8303301,0.000046619978,0.00035083102,0.0025690622,0.14366895,0.000194197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5767881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54995227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3694317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025402443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024778272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400583026","doi":"10.1145/3660780","title":"Do Words Have Power? Understanding and Fostering Civility in Code Review Discussion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Power (physics); Code (set theory); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Programming language; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0743767049240331,"score_gpt":0.3572547891152694,"score_spread":0.28287808419123633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400583026","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45128775,0.03730436,0.0026646466,0.46360862,0.0070494195,0.00348144,0.00007850154,0.001691447,0.0328338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750715,0.0009017914,0.0010658812,0.00022933671,0.000055232704,0.000018523442,5.1465304e-7,0.000013001978,0.00020859145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992168,0.00000903263,0.00020145554,0.0001729293,0.0002513514,0.000148453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993905,0.00030292667,0.00006384426,0.0001393052,0.00005731957,0.00004610714],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010176377,0.000087047105,0.0001230207,0.00010742656,0.000112905385,0.00015934107,0.0003468877,0.0000518246,0.000036232406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012476346,0.00005660425,0.000038943675,0.00062852097,0.000053149113,0.00049287436,0.00021576976,0.0003308739,0.0000019858037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007808614,0.0002898181,0.10289557,0.014108812,0.00013079497,0.00000461772,0.13324533,0.00009661167,0.0019614482,0.6513003,0.0673493,0.02853927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006900618,0.0001969912,0.03714732,0.04264146,0.00018004689,0.00002156948,0.03627914,0.00056796527,0.0013402586,0.060000032,0.81949896,0.0014361722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005900293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026587675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7521497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021505181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088904126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400595661","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jah.v2024i2024.79529","title":"A Suspicion of Testimony and the Tradition of Institutional Contexts: An Exploration of Translative Practice for Conducting Ethically Responsible Research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Hermeneutics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Psychology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.4348632409180778,"score_gpt":0.539238279073781,"score_spread":0.10437503815570315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400595661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7631408,0.000337572,0.005727747,0.17148803,0.00077551825,0.001662112,0.000053946365,0.000017935767,0.05679632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99212164,0.00016799952,0.007401213,0.00010671289,0.00015670876,0.000012647869,0.000003052109,0.00000503806,0.000024980007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982382,0.0005036015,0.0005727358,0.0000763354,0.0005224834,0.00008662427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917738,0.0057303077,0.0004927638,0.0000658057,0.0018974391,0.000039916034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009448849,0.000047644713,0.00015764336,0.00019969251,0.00027478414,0.00006195773,0.000103633414,0.000091750844,0.000011954147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003487037,0.000035991325,0.000039761922,0.00059495453,0.00088998664,0.0015296878,0.0000060046777,0.0005262097,2.1507009e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009086085,0.00013699259,0.0000023310356,0.000064718435,0.000043366712,4.5070485e-7,0.17706543,0.00016708225,0.012211236,0.8056057,0.000077544995,0.0037165016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017208945,0.00075583044,0.00010323877,0.00024889826,0.00022919543,0.000014503266,0.26008698,0.0010142244,0.015353186,0.6923762,0.027998168,0.00009867485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007910369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009813366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22898082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005741968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00291368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5168743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400837229","doi":"10.51644/9781771125949-016","title":"Appendix: Statutes in Canada re the Admission of Women as Lawyers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Appendix; Law; Political science; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.04955392968417876,"score_gpt":0.3453817089754122,"score_spread":0.29582777929123344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400837229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005584625,0.000018097591,3.2645306e-7,0.04792799,0.00056836806,0.000219845,0.000014212008,0.00001675733,0.95067596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03582713,0.00019528235,0.00001517972,0.0014718401,0.00008006824,0.0000147203145,0.000025980704,0.000012548607,0.9623572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896646,0.00004916181,0.00023552479,0.0001210724,0.0004323065,0.00019546897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988892,0.00056154747,0.00018669356,0.00015918579,0.00011246119,0.000090931186],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007153248,0.00008018531,0.00012308461,0.00008405397,0.00017890472,0.00003880925,0.00023026674,0.00008834361,0.021339634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061497086,0.000058961712,0.000021223002,0.00017033787,0.00008271214,0.00013621263,0.000029141043,0.0003725295,0.00023108018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008073532,0.0000042565125,0.00006319829,0.0000067233273,0.000011986155,0.000002261264,0.011535219,0.0000018587308,5.044635e-7,0.8759782,0.11080903,0.0015786926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006227125,0.000005792037,0.00006174029,0.000026131867,0.000003397553,1.0228599e-7,0.035513416,6.4744137e-7,0.0000022964316,0.020693742,0.9435581,0.00007237932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98714095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99556965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85528445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010643194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01927847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98628134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400837333","doi":"10.51644/9781771125949-002","title":"Prologue Telling the Stories of Women Becoming Lawyers in Ontario","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prologue; History; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.137016692542849,"score_gpt":0.35983153162183745,"score_spread":0.22281483907898844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400837333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031117348,0.000010550423,0.000005698273,0.013962761,0.0007117326,0.00022402678,0.0000018665118,0.00003301716,0.9819386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03888034,0.00003944423,0.000103621336,0.00042315986,0.00011722035,0.000023277233,0.0000068920895,0.000011461066,0.96039456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991919,0.000037080878,0.00024722074,0.00011768724,0.00022638465,0.00017976123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893206,0.0005995135,0.00019030926,0.00012833349,0.00011834401,0.00003146518],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015406221,0.00007768471,0.00013799037,0.00011795574,0.00023280244,0.0000645525,0.000196051,0.00014812796,0.0025389527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003420694,0.000060338803,0.000031976808,0.00011190086,0.00019519938,0.00018357002,0.000025951229,0.0006176948,0.00007873436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034056143,0.0000062176246,0.00036551067,0.0000035278465,0.000014837993,4.441841e-7,0.20208967,0.0000050652084,4.7055616e-7,0.7958124,0.0011149647,0.00058344036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031995387,0.000008563602,0.00019172356,0.000018851595,0.000005676736,8.434364e-8,0.03266776,6.346589e-7,0.0000016322637,0.028247168,0.9387548,0.00007111478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5376062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9573644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93763983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073670974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023872596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400854739","doi":"10.69893/gjle.000009","title":"ALLOWING LAWYERS TO CHARGE CONTINGENCY FEES: IMPACT ON THE LEGAL SERVICES MARKET","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gnlu Journal Of Law And Economics.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal service; Business; Contingency; Charge (physics); Actuarial science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.019562338028192166,"score_gpt":0.32074994714587535,"score_spread":0.30118760911768316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400854739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6804494,0.000032827993,0.0000010216982,0.03487023,0.00057849195,0.00007152019,0.0000030945057,0.0000029886692,0.2839904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889242,0.000102543025,0.00005325828,0.008512455,0.0003394478,0.0000010350823,4.4694045e-7,0.0000051694888,0.002061428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939436,0.00007582439,0.0002345018,0.00007389511,0.000070806185,0.00015060185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923915,0.00025853794,0.00022751025,0.000083670915,0.000085133994,0.000106013395],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014797641,0.000063579035,0.00012260463,0.000049991464,0.00030040854,0.0003807512,0.00018419344,0.00003553767,0.0018861905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060871032,0.000043665863,0.000066629225,0.00006596389,0.000034999914,0.00090796145,0.000014294436,0.00019510774,0.00011446851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013279953,0.0000698342,0.010007376,0.000010449586,0.00013796652,0.0000016780036,0.023026578,0.000048605438,0.00012523959,0.9530414,0.0117493,0.0016487907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018785075,0.00008288516,0.003421418,0.000028176311,0.000011600095,0.000006428606,0.0059496174,0.000033756896,0.0000321176,0.0010339286,0.98912823,0.00008399041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026937583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080438226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9773789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006906898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021261453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401073304","doi":"10.7202/1112614ar","title":"Ethnographie comparée de facultés de droit canadiennes : un voyage aller-retour","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de l’Université de Moncton","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028769595198254533,"score_gpt":0.2734466323880759,"score_spread":0.2446770371898214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401073304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7594534,0.0012309598,0.0002404253,0.13865519,0.00081597693,0.0002274739,0.00014263659,0.00009016687,0.09914377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91126156,0.0007336432,0.0010412143,0.0026201005,0.0003592423,0.000017827142,0.00006795587,0.000028390947,0.083870046],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741787,0.00078785204,0.00024387837,0.000339884,0.0002871829,0.00092335604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843735,0.00035878236,0.00027252463,0.00027483393,0.00014705719,0.0005094476],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012530821,0.00019696637,0.00023265879,0.00027796277,0.0028162545,0.000100810095,0.0006485758,0.00020788272,0.009424401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020627012,0.0002973801,0.00018829138,0.0020652718,0.00028063575,0.00044835598,0.0001859454,0.0010487019,0.00006750864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109040804,0.00055558473,0.059249125,0.00010340295,0.00037511342,0.0006794936,0.45457646,0.0034737696,0.00088329904,0.27342,0.18858875,0.017985962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035760144,0.000071010974,0.029495966,0.000025160838,0.00019308575,0.00014241404,0.07132956,0.0015289516,0.000096800286,0.0025902034,0.8938463,0.0003229692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2063965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12465233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70525753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056546633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015217474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401108609","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4909227","title":"Foreword, Addresses, and Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03488003395469257,"score_gpt":0.4017020938091489,"score_spread":0.3668220598544563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401108609","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014831857,0.5345136,0.0002739484,0.39606145,0.0025550087,0.0004342168,0.00001708407,0.00008404761,0.06457747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1625494,0.8028287,0.000121355115,0.0023918499,0.001803728,0.00003175025,0.000015175137,0.000024455016,0.030233549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977407,0.000253647,0.00031615616,0.00022213798,0.00035018267,0.0011171992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911517,0.00012003741,0.00025645722,0.00015817351,0.0002468606,0.00010331971],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050514834,0.00013775073,0.00019643312,0.00012948597,0.00047518575,0.0003871677,0.00030016174,0.00017001481,0.00036039852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010215672,0.0001249654,0.000095801486,0.00034018865,0.000102504004,0.00021121089,0.00017024904,0.009813011,0.000102842925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022388651,0.000017544276,0.000026640757,0.00022970903,0.0001015089,0.000001534836,0.0011620249,3.685387e-7,4.872297e-7,0.9217931,0.03226115,0.044403706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026444848,0.000011198947,0.000010059218,0.00065954775,0.00009533391,0.00004575172,0.0016751203,0.0000018030911,2.1919722e-7,0.51324946,0.48413092,0.00009417943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023448193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011854923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45186976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010331245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033641465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401233490","doi":"10.1097/01.eem.0001027768.30642.7b","title":"Evidence Mounting for the Green Whistle","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emergency Medicine News","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.28542194880388067,"score_gpt":0.5070587739982222,"score_spread":0.22163682519434152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401233490","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068988244,0.012059613,0.003898808,0.80694366,0.012671062,0.00038205093,0.000001740757,0.000109093184,0.16324411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.493889,0.008132458,0.00038978143,0.0033124257,0.01730635,0.00027612885,0.000009396447,0.000028246102,0.4766562],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912643,0.00006890124,0.00024078166,0.00014040103,0.00026308704,0.00016038609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845874,0.0011151616,0.000055938446,0.00014211943,0.00018105133,0.000046971752],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015851792,0.000056017227,0.00006135678,0.000056428722,0.00061922614,0.000032171756,0.00021495277,0.000031794363,0.012226421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051589734,0.00003538094,0.000039568753,0.0008256226,0.00010285556,0.00051074754,0.000011370887,0.00017643246,0.00014773292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023059933,0.000005995219,0.00034240336,0.000024796558,0.000013037905,1.7460447e-7,0.031244615,0.0000010469264,0.00010654085,0.10553864,0.8350176,0.027702807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025933115,0.000016400596,0.00029850265,0.000067641115,0.00003566087,2.844999e-7,0.009499909,0.0002167188,0.0000035940093,0.0033024414,0.986486,0.00004689077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038829055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009321413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80363125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045990866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038448736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98867655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401362369","doi":"10.7202/1112316ar","title":"Professional Ethics and Law in Education: A Canadian Guidebook by Bruce Maxwell, Dianne Gereluk and Christopher Martin, Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars, 2022","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Professional ethics; Media studies; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06208237558525663,"score_gpt":0.42318558605193785,"score_spread":0.3611032104666812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401362369","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06644797,0.008753992,6.5894915e-7,0.7731826,0.0057284054,0.0005931678,0.000027744436,0.00003300352,0.1452325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95672834,0.0007527008,0.0001056706,0.03620045,0.0014880373,0.0002595019,0.00017932346,0.000022996897,0.0042629996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977896,0.0005969781,0.0003966928,0.0004670997,0.0003370782,0.00041254773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983599,0.000505576,0.000063819076,0.00020707386,0.00020463795,0.0006589761],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019168418,0.00016975602,0.00014473747,0.00041330568,0.00075851893,0.00046313135,0.00018294313,0.00042185863,0.0010319221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015002155,0.00018814014,0.000021602116,0.00079054816,0.00043281598,0.0013135719,0.000021652517,0.0016984963,0.000050939285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007731378,0.00020162365,0.0016552594,0.00003783284,0.0000061037226,0.0000030906444,0.037446845,4.2085406e-7,0.000014122359,0.8697883,0.08090514,0.009933549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008669493,0.00002198865,0.0034567737,0.00021147687,0.000008101684,0.000006428014,0.0124315275,0.00001673347,0.00000345335,0.08467473,0.898856,0.00022607957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91866726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9677547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89028037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020925268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024401948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401505038","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4907049","title":"ACCESSIBILITY, QUALITY, AND PROFITABILITY FOR PERSONAL PLIGHT LAW FIRMS: HITTING THE SWEET SPOT","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Profitability index; Sweet spot; Quality (philosophy); Business; Law; Advertising; Engineering; Political science; Finance; Simulation; Philosophy","score_opus":0.081519708274486,"score_gpt":0.44696297830134846,"score_spread":0.36544327002686244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401505038","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47345567,0.0063385414,0.0006620022,0.4891318,0.0030505625,0.0016062186,0.00006297167,0.0001181161,0.025574127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99192166,0.0007770799,0.00013987918,0.0009355546,0.002287868,0.00011546429,0.000015938713,0.00002499029,0.0037815878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595284,0.000780894,0.0006565185,0.00050402764,0.00058643264,0.0015192921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973666,0.0012055255,0.0005409394,0.00024397668,0.00052707025,0.00011585381],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022184808,0.0002261906,0.00027420846,0.00008497558,0.0021363213,0.0017019138,0.0006069007,0.00028829434,0.00011386293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023405957,0.00016437353,0.00022595776,0.00030334407,0.00048654008,0.00044118156,0.00040825875,0.007915889,0.000012661943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036290818,0.00007457079,0.0011514048,0.00012424699,0.00016275133,2.5708846e-7,0.022650173,7.6093505e-7,0.000011629919,0.9665803,0.0006372636,0.008570406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014740061,0.00003815158,0.00083164976,0.000055410575,0.00010686808,0.000018364553,0.030538846,0.00005733192,0.000008206906,0.9139757,0.05400936,0.00021267282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071419803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041074138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.518466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017265007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021532612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401534339","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4912503","title":"The E-Team Project: A Teamwork Approach to Clinical Legal Education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Engineering management; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.039209549831845256,"score_gpt":0.4439703646722639,"score_spread":0.40476081484041865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401534339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0105014555,0.005524934,0.007791231,0.24937269,0.009775446,0.00085230725,0.0000014608285,0.00019176719,0.7159887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8825226,0.0036941115,0.000682408,0.0014455153,0.006617567,0.00007640257,0.0000036142599,0.000021322108,0.1049365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973418,0.00049497903,0.0003743611,0.00019979922,0.00039074413,0.0011982783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897784,0.00041908014,0.000095930634,0.00015522198,0.00023696633,0.000114964205],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009804219,0.00008799257,0.00008593232,0.00013341678,0.0016215169,0.0014920001,0.0004119865,0.00008646987,0.000022377808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016779699,0.00006196443,0.00010364787,0.0012377761,0.00011867475,0.0007414609,0.000021479287,0.0035178286,0.00020224419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010629268,0.00012186814,0.000119955905,0.0000014575595,0.000041575873,9.3559926e-8,0.0036824555,0.0000011110295,0.000001080531,0.810169,0.069049366,0.116801426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004070535,0.000057756988,0.00009092722,0.000011526149,0.000019337613,0.000053718883,0.045212664,0.000019605408,4.6180813e-7,0.07297639,0.8814366,0.00008029655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021743907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037254845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8720211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096611027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06629893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401535991","doi":"10.7202/1107443ar","title":"L’ADMINISTRATION DE LA JUSTICE ET LA STRUCTURE JUDICIAIRE CANADIENNE","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.00786441816603578,"score_gpt":0.2713071557782086,"score_spread":0.2634427376121728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401535991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38445035,0.00045034746,0.00078394264,0.039737068,0.0005248837,0.00013120116,0.00007546705,0.00005774991,0.573789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86101,0.0002621301,0.001588377,0.0011144838,0.00066200364,0.0000018530517,0.0000576471,0.000019644369,0.13528387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982389,0.00064308016,0.00019693488,0.0002473149,0.00014301766,0.00053070334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860406,0.00062727334,0.00018812619,0.00018533664,0.00014430523,0.00025090313],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091178727,0.0001530914,0.00014619634,0.000115629184,0.0007335622,0.00020052164,0.0002565339,0.0004382035,0.0011169416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030721564,0.00022651564,0.00007561711,0.0007495278,0.00032663892,0.0005852088,0.000030619773,0.0006709148,0.00003955304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002592157,0.00010793936,0.0034126076,0.00011900483,0.000030731153,0.00020724974,0.009347366,0.0008890607,0.00063136755,0.9692339,0.013298068,0.0026967977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027497025,0.000036331374,0.025473563,0.000098585,0.00030406067,0.00028416485,0.0050901393,0.00044560988,0.00018504754,0.026311696,0.94125295,0.0002428642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.086857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23934832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9429222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003907571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026831403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401777829","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v13n4p23","title":"Academic Freedom, Institutional Autonomy in Higher Education Institutions in Uganda: Policy, Legal and Ethical Tensions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Autonomy; Higher education; Dilemma; Freedom of movement; Power (physics); Sociology; Politics; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07836540301282276,"score_gpt":0.4681939514894803,"score_spread":0.38982854847665754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401777829","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1798779,0.0026050548,0.00006478755,0.70943993,0.025976144,0.000235241,0.000012621576,0.00004021379,0.081748076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784996,0.00038447705,0.0008022333,0.005034705,0.0051183365,0.000037671995,0.00003294328,0.000011080696,0.010078973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798596,0.00021665277,0.00075004535,0.00021769622,0.00063047983,0.00019919607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998372,0.00033016998,0.00023668507,0.00009409783,0.0008074075,0.00015964247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010325212,0.00013204632,0.00015729043,0.0017526918,0.00019375267,0.00041269607,0.00035876886,0.00031708143,0.0008005881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072146417,0.00013128796,0.000065247616,0.0012201432,0.0003342516,0.0019979058,0.00004240976,0.0018217455,0.00004163061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022985598,0.00029262592,0.006890751,0.000009578136,0.00002803381,0.000007263256,0.0040355586,0.00012979457,0.00014462124,0.96649736,0.01159259,0.010348837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022550975,0.000014555902,0.14021458,0.00030694593,0.000015455416,0.00007044532,0.0007653572,0.000017407552,0.00000663921,0.019407844,0.838836,0.000119270044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064475606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082189165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9470895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019266183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0365035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97468257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401803884","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-96110-8_9511","title":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Legal Studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.06407463263638659,"score_gpt":0.37102782993033323,"score_spread":0.30695319729394666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401803884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011533313,0.0020524964,0.000012611152,0.016785538,0.0050697676,0.00088001747,0.00038820802,0.00011792966,0.9746819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5893024,0.00027262207,0.0004238334,0.0012989794,0.0011771322,0.00013102987,0.00011817301,0.000051581213,0.40722424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984332,0.000019858777,0.00036867088,0.00042113778,0.00031003557,0.000447152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844027,0.00022615705,0.0001735287,0.00029600336,0.00056713895,0.00029690447],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045250115,0.00030060377,0.00032838937,0.00042263546,0.000883677,0.00030435185,0.00030018343,0.00029130606,0.00037455407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041415053,0.00030394728,0.00017992222,0.00005816085,0.0003857218,0.0000059915797,0.000039617167,0.00050507387,0.00037634373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072184293,1.322294e-7,0.0000019123627,0.00005102494,0.00018645529,0.000016276821,0.0048605693,7.620919e-7,0.0000026377033,0.98409426,0.002000328,0.008778445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061760584,0.000014441191,0.0000010242663,0.000070616385,0.00006326328,0.0000017293484,0.00089841225,5.483037e-7,0.0000033062706,0.47684535,0.52184135,0.00019819156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11283703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86518735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75235033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081772986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004247283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401805327","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-96110-8_9568","title":"Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the United Kingdom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts; Canada Council for the Arts; École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales; Strong","keywords":"Commonwealth; Scholarship; Kingdom; Commission; Political science; Public administration; Law; Geology","score_opus":0.13248395660810094,"score_gpt":0.39012480671970545,"score_spread":0.25764085011160454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401805327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024356518,0.00026674024,0.000004498105,0.018341167,0.0008509625,0.00057859765,0.00003554143,0.000105568186,0.97957337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94914,0.00007127602,0.000053329666,0.0027221183,0.0005680161,0.000029440293,0.00011076237,0.00004572922,0.047259342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779916,0.0003365743,0.00047129908,0.00033052306,0.0007065468,0.0003559166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980171,0.0008511292,0.00025810275,0.0005308974,0.00020390522,0.00013889931],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002362525,0.000279566,0.00025258295,0.00061431393,0.0007230568,0.0005878046,0.0007376682,0.00040607326,0.0009193204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036438793,0.00021726651,0.00012066291,0.00023239161,0.00032223843,0.0000034157506,0.00008159021,0.0021183991,0.0005589951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091350585,8.5389087e-7,0.00015187614,0.000027315975,0.00002239583,0.000022765436,0.010974675,2.991075e-7,0.0000022803413,0.98642075,0.00060424744,0.001763398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006559551,0.000012480498,0.00017777458,0.00014343337,0.000025445152,0.0000032770567,0.0007811433,0.000001933698,9.940048e-7,0.52366626,0.47497094,0.0001507345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00880427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010077801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9488964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023924436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008248041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401878531","doi":"10.1080/17579961.2024.2392938","title":"The language of the law vs. the language of the computer: a bilingual model of legal education in the age of technology and artificial intelligence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Innovation and Technology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Bilingual education; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Political science; Psychology; Mathematics education; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025197735728977523,"score_gpt":0.3583111817615598,"score_spread":0.33311344603258225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401878531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8750891,0.00040783544,0.00028132138,0.11746988,0.00029579282,0.00038032708,0.0000108726545,0.000027750242,0.0060371254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998819,0.00003019684,0.00023972067,0.0006478973,0.000034310553,0.000017791863,0.0000023986565,0.000004366925,0.00020435207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903345,0.00012531178,0.00043508713,0.00011971705,0.00018040305,0.000106044776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881256,0.00032219212,0.000264189,0.00034246044,0.0002544887,0.0000041097846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010908813,0.000067720626,0.00011232675,0.00020625215,0.00029704795,0.00004798693,0.0004994199,0.0001414702,0.0000051533025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049275975,0.000032326872,0.000023030108,0.0039774077,0.0024360667,0.00011547383,0.00010727894,0.00042384266,3.2565103e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050501812,0.00005716832,0.00021331437,0.000019353682,0.000009303164,1.4106807e-7,0.014050588,0.000008167662,0.0056045065,0.9499374,0.00005653956,0.030038461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014668907,0.0001284531,0.00074359425,0.00020134842,0.000060864306,0.000021750284,0.24800782,0.0027982544,0.07337828,0.5923551,0.08197506,0.00018280552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031482964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011187374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35758233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001679423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005581184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89757895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402082081","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-61565-8_31","title":"A Proposal for Training ABA Practitioners in Ethical Deliberation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"˜The œInternational Library of Bioethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Surrey Place Centre; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Training (meteorology); Ethical issues; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.12786575268881714,"score_gpt":0.4064448914329867,"score_spread":0.2785791387441695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402082081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011028116,0.000075605785,0.00020920204,0.4239005,0.0015480008,0.0003775611,0.00016542325,0.000051608014,0.573661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032172766,0.00051343837,0.007198552,0.01037376,0.0023955747,0.00010732727,0.0010622094,0.00007726876,0.9460991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825704,0.00008109909,0.0005239445,0.00026765137,0.0007222534,0.00014801137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997526,0.0016076948,0.0003703105,0.00013948584,0.00030522706,0.000051290484],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015423263,0.00015016524,0.00016359173,0.00030612346,0.00023897871,0.00039906005,0.0004371092,0.0007861509,0.0010324777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000386418,0.00013424021,0.00013755789,0.00014279128,0.0006896603,0.0009417809,0.000056947483,0.0022433407,0.00006344982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004205464,0.00002341603,0.000003037239,0.000032248558,0.00006303627,0.0000019032202,0.012619974,0.00001094307,0.000010781079,0.95831865,0.02690477,0.001969209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079022124,0.000018949608,0.0000037037232,0.00011154914,0.000020176374,0.0000020103544,0.0016848139,0.0001701812,0.00000899416,0.38583052,0.61197406,0.000096008014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037843784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029287576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5850693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010466163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052056382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402098464","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/74p59","title":"Between Law and Conscience: The Role of Legality in Moral Decision-Making","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Conscience; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.057879708433685416,"score_gpt":0.43752712463032106,"score_spread":0.37964741619663567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402098464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2146955,0.00043324468,0.00004377313,0.031155873,0.00061767205,0.0002789906,0.000020659038,0.00003010502,0.7527242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980179,0.000023184968,0.0009120677,0.000520749,0.00013721887,0.0000122425,0.0000017072406,0.0000034180232,0.00037153094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988512,0.00018342074,0.000290366,0.00021375666,0.0003331269,0.00012816687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813706,0.0013770361,0.0001243927,0.00019633974,0.00013219404,0.00003298864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025120084,0.00007042907,0.00013333962,0.00008986036,0.00024968124,0.00043176083,0.00030910177,0.00013013577,0.00026546422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010890459,0.000049852195,0.000033073986,0.0005358149,0.000656767,0.00019828464,0.00037684754,0.00076007715,0.000012541009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014232706,0.0000127294,0.013742451,0.000008928911,0.000006121676,2.3409135e-7,0.014106167,0.0000062681597,0.0000025589777,0.9588803,0.00034630366,0.012886504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021846932,0.000003006329,0.009482992,0.000098942415,0.000015834587,2.2753743e-7,0.015863527,0.00006416224,0.000019061423,0.8618661,0.11248331,0.000080960184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051477026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024403555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7833224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061331346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012827081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99339855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402110236","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v2i2.43525","title":"Reply to \"Concealed Aims of Education?\"","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.04675415400378859,"score_gpt":0.4496439783822719,"score_spread":0.4028898243784833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402110236","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14896025,0.00020266353,0.00023283249,0.5137113,0.008645313,0.00021011174,0.000006152426,0.0000074605337,0.32802394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90718687,0.000039925693,0.03231092,0.012111791,0.008837206,0.000010901494,0.0000042040233,0.0000107397,0.039487436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846536,0.00017536418,0.00060782937,0.00010454691,0.00049785344,0.00014906908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99461305,0.00065904215,0.0007320622,0.00017875583,0.0036061427,0.00021096515],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001364189,0.00007147161,0.00014956054,0.00032586997,0.00030811774,0.00008002395,0.00035477284,0.00004721694,0.004069347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055516697,0.00006730816,0.00007819975,0.0011974188,0.00022558944,0.0007600881,0.000015523112,0.00019899925,0.00017299774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031796488,0.00043907604,0.0035509174,0.000005207082,0.000026412701,7.8857845e-8,0.01413828,0.0000020096704,0.0002764979,0.55030483,0.42768523,0.0035396973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008854948,0.00009229874,0.011441305,0.000046479163,0.000018866984,0.000011418797,0.0069540143,3.6878922e-7,0.0004566846,0.015315471,0.9655003,0.00007427514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000666024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013051153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75822663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001749718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011116946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402110470","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v26i3.52294","title":"The sociology of law: Critical approaches to social control","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Social control; Sociology of law; Critical theory; Social science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2195577780118939,"score_gpt":0.46739157257286196,"score_spread":0.24783379456096805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402110470","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025379883,0.0001413037,0.000468276,0.85079145,0.0026615723,0.00009754191,0.000007830124,0.0000029900416,0.12044915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848353,0.0000073488354,0.002920566,0.0032069564,0.006998802,0.0000074752106,7.770805e-7,0.0000048103566,0.0020179318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986164,0.00039920263,0.00040512145,0.00006731949,0.00034292781,0.00016900185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948671,0.0034124516,0.00031611964,0.00007204023,0.001237107,0.00009521215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020456077,0.000052762087,0.0001238521,0.00006488279,0.0011468893,0.00007567034,0.0002981394,0.00006927114,0.0005601186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005699431,0.000038337108,0.00007964601,0.00023985954,0.0017053732,0.0003435913,0.000011719455,0.00025094987,0.000050659917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004016396,0.00013090899,0.00023733538,0.0000017070463,0.00002764084,5.2427325e-8,0.02032515,6.2671364e-7,0.000053352327,0.9341768,0.044553317,0.00045296704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012242624,0.00007720598,0.0044494593,0.000005713341,0.000024573596,0.0000050182375,0.009655898,0.0000016301683,0.00005279717,0.14662026,0.83893496,0.00005006815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013606828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001875405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95945543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008556847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002159497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88210607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402188623","doi":"10.32920/26871448","title":"The Perils of Justice: The Experiences of Black Immigrants and Other Racialized Families in Contact with the Justice System in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Immigration; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02916151038525104,"score_gpt":0.34583847162496845,"score_spread":0.3166769612397174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402188623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9038584,0.0009154218,0.000006580517,0.017450742,0.0010860389,0.00072775537,0.000016666805,0.000007896376,0.07593046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980575,0.00025098262,0.0000138712885,0.00037996916,0.00007347594,0.00013833604,6.615435e-7,0.000006995736,0.001078225],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824816,0.0005294284,0.00041407155,0.00018125508,0.00045142518,0.00017563539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968123,0.0024051557,0.00032419627,0.00025520404,0.00017742584,0.000025759822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016845505,0.00012212613,0.00022345572,0.00006175432,0.00032272103,0.00019228287,0.00045449063,0.00007110869,0.0000753216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065721927,0.000052785697,0.000024822119,0.00061656325,0.00062415545,0.000079767226,0.000104995524,0.0005065136,0.0000011803087],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006955447,0.00001837801,0.0009897283,0.00052256696,0.000044479923,0.0000013097856,0.8417583,0.00010218223,0.000011033166,0.15401995,0.0021101064,0.00035237006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009811956,0.0000074281243,0.0017879335,0.00018449934,0.00012724932,5.553838e-7,0.9762948,0.00023972579,0.000023575343,0.00009395869,0.021065703,0.000076423625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9822662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99545324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15392599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020523812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067284997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402188991","doi":"10.32920/26871448.v1","title":"The Perils of Justice: The Experiences of Black Immigrants and Other Racialized Families in Contact with the Justice System in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology; Racial bias; Gender studies; Racism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02916151038525104,"score_gpt":0.34583847162496845,"score_spread":0.3166769612397174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402188991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9038584,0.0009154218,0.000006580517,0.017450742,0.0010860389,0.00072775537,0.000016666805,0.000007896376,0.07593046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980575,0.00025098262,0.0000138712885,0.00037996916,0.00007347594,0.00013833604,6.615435e-7,0.000006995736,0.001078225],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824816,0.0005294284,0.00041407155,0.00018125508,0.00045142518,0.00017563539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968123,0.0024051557,0.00032419627,0.00025520404,0.00017742584,0.000025759822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016845505,0.00012212613,0.00022345572,0.00006175432,0.00032272103,0.00019228287,0.00045449063,0.00007110869,0.0000753216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065721927,0.000052785697,0.000024822119,0.00061656325,0.00062415545,0.000079767226,0.000104995524,0.0005065136,0.0000011803087],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006955447,0.00001837801,0.0009897283,0.00052256696,0.000044479923,0.0000013097856,0.8417583,0.00010218223,0.000011033166,0.15401995,0.0021101064,0.00035237006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009811956,0.0000074281243,0.0017879335,0.00018449934,0.00012724932,5.553838e-7,0.9762948,0.00023972579,0.000023575343,0.00009395869,0.021065703,0.000076423625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9822662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99545324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15392599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020523812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067284997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402366298","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4923411","title":"Law School Success: A Matter of Heart (Réussir ses études en droit: une affaire de cœur)","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01269163613273186,"score_gpt":0.3388415412764044,"score_spread":0.3261499051436726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402366298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10382696,0.035466228,0.00078775367,0.7787913,0.0025719593,0.0002069832,0.0000156553,0.00006433489,0.07826882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495252,0.005585415,0.0002675253,0.002136452,0.0017503825,0.000009239341,0.0000033168997,0.00003095475,0.04069153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647456,0.00053905917,0.0005035783,0.00023204743,0.00046420534,0.0017865563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886984,0.00040277428,0.00014435871,0.00015738305,0.00022869317,0.0001969662],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037129105,0.00018029909,0.0002294379,0.00017641862,0.0005603602,0.00056807406,0.00037778882,0.00020371286,0.003089823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026631673,0.00017902431,0.00018899197,0.0014690666,0.0003900991,0.0020217388,0.00003252485,0.0041252174,0.00074356265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014931109,0.00016579936,0.0020175735,0.00006818484,0.0002374546,0.0000051634142,0.005723437,0.000013033891,0.00027536802,0.9765046,0.01177068,0.0032037375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014861766,0.00012861336,0.00072276185,0.00025565323,0.00012937668,0.00045392208,0.022976898,0.000034201967,0.00010283428,0.34667614,0.6281772,0.00019376472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018001096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031998694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84569824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022951881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023229148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402416649","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12819","title":"Exploring litigation abuse in Ontario: An analysis of costs decisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Criminology; Business; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.3093681621485638,"score_gpt":0.44585235867958023,"score_spread":0.13648419653101646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402416649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8984691,0.02871042,0.00036474902,0.019331792,0.0012772193,0.0006301622,0.000017017195,0.0000981045,0.051101465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9060091,0.09125521,0.0005695548,0.0012432914,0.000052405696,0.000089461355,0.000070321694,0.0000065768377,0.00070410495],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880916,0.00023089943,0.00037955065,0.00016236857,0.00030337015,0.00011465389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894136,0.00051929214,0.000077275006,0.00019639752,0.00019909056,0.00006655562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017746809,0.000059200825,0.00020814448,0.00035835794,0.00009965831,0.00010611178,0.00014094982,0.000032566593,0.00066609785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080592255,0.000056260516,0.000087937915,0.003490597,0.000038705293,0.0013926756,0.000007473344,0.0002470103,0.000058331683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100905945,0.00060649775,0.04462666,0.0005325046,0.00053897576,0.000021117306,0.20365544,0.00017465392,0.00018140805,0.33724913,0.01972815,0.39267537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002434443,0.000009059908,0.107713416,0.0018434235,0.0003405222,1.6118659e-7,0.0031933687,0.000112669026,0.0000014874198,0.00015789496,0.8865225,0.00008118752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26045913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59160936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8667943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004044607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010206695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74446553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402678859","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2024.51845.mck","title":"Ontario Superior Court of Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.07868375591964542,"score_gpt":0.41709817802420934,"score_spread":0.3384144221045639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402678859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012656807,0.080880955,0.00011966891,0.0804346,0.001985412,0.00031563593,0.000004444682,0.000077848,0.83491576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8284487,0.06485833,0.003841943,0.021299878,0.00092392025,0.0000839327,0.000026578657,0.000027811824,0.08048891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936163,0.00008403895,0.00019607092,0.00009143647,0.00017104206,0.00009578336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994947,0.00020811548,0.00004200044,0.00010424739,0.000114625764,0.00003635616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009435701,0.000041872205,0.000108721026,0.000019406549,0.00016379569,0.000083545056,0.00009975902,0.00002593337,0.0036297957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042312333,0.00003779506,0.000045149245,0.00038219147,0.00009131392,0.00036356805,0.000009455731,0.00016566766,0.00028295323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.094297e-7,0.000015535074,0.000025565954,0.0013396896,0.000009572672,0.0000015309441,0.0064379238,5.6530816e-8,0.000013601618,0.955125,0.024011739,0.013019495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010845163,0.000004371681,0.000051266623,0.0015484907,0.000114159775,0.0000016782211,0.0002863163,9.07005e-7,0.000005825507,0.0002810085,0.99765015,0.000045003715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08215196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06776365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096249925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001021047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403222339","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4946735","title":"Improving the Peer Review Process: How to Write a Good Referee Report","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Computer science; Peer review; Psychology; Political science; Operating system; Law","score_opus":0.04504017072595843,"score_gpt":0.40099873907194294,"score_spread":0.3559585683459845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403222339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010560396,0.027537733,0.0006926157,0.91974497,0.0022174076,0.00080442155,0.0000069019993,0.00009160268,0.047848325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5068193,0.0492168,0.00031452632,0.009185137,0.0067186407,0.0003367752,0.000048307127,0.00008769944,0.4272728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99541,0.00040796457,0.0005589096,0.0004333154,0.0015925723,0.0015972215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597,0.0001486614,0.00075374753,0.0005031454,0.0024702658,0.00015416041],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023165695,0.00022749863,0.00027695115,0.00016444406,0.0009801126,0.0015619469,0.00096285436,0.00020916334,0.00015712371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012451601,0.00016229335,0.00020426801,0.00095675077,0.00007486578,0.00035972972,0.00026794532,0.013639819,0.00013763561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012394614,0.00008186695,0.000069508234,0.0006499379,0.00038365144,0.000032239484,0.011493589,0.0000046184514,0.000016164691,0.79096967,0.13324933,0.06303707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033596047,0.0000295346,0.0000128183365,0.00068906945,0.00019253684,0.00039808074,0.011041992,0.0000030980075,0.0000020558014,0.21566844,0.7717298,0.00019894446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016742302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010831375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91055983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019548596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055527408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403283636","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v9i5.2925","title":"IPDLN Workshop: Opportunities for Cross-Country Comparisons of Linked Administrative Education and Health Data","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Population Data Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Business","score_opus":0.6097572420545042,"score_gpt":0.6301518757336448,"score_spread":0.020394633679140628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403283636","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05769012,0.0034585753,0.16056223,0.6932512,0.05607483,0.002966116,0.016375856,0.00021367648,0.009407396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97278345,0.00042949317,0.019259878,0.000800777,0.0013148111,0.000020004727,0.0035347089,0.000009187378,0.001847723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982152,0.000052346553,0.00053711096,0.00033849152,0.0006748549,0.00018196876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972635,0.0005437472,0.00043109598,0.000352557,0.0012615505,0.0001475474],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052258754,0.000077217475,0.00011020646,0.00034803152,0.0010345321,0.0020401708,0.0016004698,0.00004251521,0.000051943774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032294462,0.00007524649,0.000021236123,0.00045184023,0.00046531204,0.008451267,0.0001825141,0.00019289904,0.0000011238718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044723558,0.0001860087,0.005635922,0.000045984452,0.00005564289,5.3628344e-7,0.004116796,0.000029735802,0.000030378906,0.7369092,0.1460339,0.10691116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001583469,0.000034995308,0.011503168,0.00015625861,0.000018552146,0.000021509075,0.012402685,0.011177073,0.0000047475887,0.0062609566,0.95815015,0.00011153224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014349199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016415982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9150933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019771094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008103829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403565147","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4992046","title":"Enhancing Lawyers' Well-Being and Competencies Beyond the Traditional Law School Curriculum: The Impact of Mindfulness Education on Law Students","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Hospital for Sick Children; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mindfulness; Curriculum; Legal education; Psychology; Law; Pedagogy; Sociology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.012350837654531953,"score_gpt":0.34672689667377815,"score_spread":0.3343760590192462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403565147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8430837,0.0012374335,0.00026789895,0.040682986,0.0012714827,0.0003014707,0.0000033227036,0.000026839356,0.113124885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971959,0.00014510848,0.000011152357,0.0007540161,0.0007703498,0.000018266752,0.000004295058,0.000008387016,0.0010925351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982666,0.00031393082,0.00023861641,0.000121384226,0.000501724,0.00055779226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990138,0.00050191197,0.00013559978,0.00009875698,0.0001832637,0.00006670771],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030744814,0.0000966149,0.00008812709,0.000073146904,0.001595886,0.00069242914,0.00031551754,0.00004483563,0.0002592598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017065548,0.0000559522,0.00008891297,0.0004497336,0.00030090305,0.00075099885,0.000015986194,0.0017264658,0.00003152947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056395756,0.00013400624,0.00031444873,0.0000035544206,0.00009996265,2.1926165e-7,0.005336385,0.000009921675,0.00004588114,0.9916638,0.0008238015,0.0015623475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013407193,0.0001492846,0.0015044406,0.000082861174,0.00006583293,0.00008848932,0.07582745,0.000020411911,0.00021451077,0.89697874,0.02481159,0.00012229315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010086051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012490128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1541122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007546165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077923415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403734335","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v13n5p56","title":"Reforming Saudi Legal Education for the Digital Age","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03535946285575702,"score_gpt":0.43794514152097663,"score_spread":0.4025856786652196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403734335","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017729921,0.0057650614,0.0017427767,0.6191042,0.10340351,0.0005035133,0.0000249011,0.0000753423,0.25165075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241234,0.00014141509,0.0005432278,0.0018012449,0.008613506,0.000035414174,0.000029185649,0.000012257014,0.064700335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988667,0.000042366595,0.00037519247,0.00010056492,0.0005002543,0.00011493615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978381,0.00052863796,0.00025780973,0.000089992245,0.0012202249,0.0000652419],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065916544,0.00007405614,0.0000688852,0.00026396342,0.00025499807,0.0016518189,0.00044403243,0.000052666368,0.0004487724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006123284,0.000054711392,0.00011613058,0.00031836986,0.00008484753,0.0022567774,0.000014533838,0.0002712756,0.000043751912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002047674,0.00018017026,0.000119300385,0.000007468882,0.000088695124,0.0000012255646,0.0042931377,0.0000053129916,0.00005993537,0.57986826,0.14205521,0.27330083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006327804,0.000018430746,0.0019486459,0.000080956415,0.000034222237,0.000029983075,0.0040594167,0.0000071407935,0.00002835518,0.01298433,0.9806792,0.00006603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000491022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005574448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90639347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046129973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055257026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403764058","doi":"10.24908/pceea.2023.17149","title":"Academic integrity: A restorative justice approach in first year engineering","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Restorative justice; Structural integrity; Engineering ethics; Economic Justice; Engineering; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Structural engineering","score_opus":0.024024945498316654,"score_gpt":0.30332308372500005,"score_spread":0.2792981382266834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403764058","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28301835,0.0014584538,0.00037227987,0.4514881,0.022606716,0.0027132435,0.00009557301,0.0008433935,0.23740387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928391,0.000049750124,0.0015680856,0.00023665812,0.0005630504,0.00009647175,0.0000071996155,0.000024180365,0.004615491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988414,0.000016134423,0.00028684037,0.00019082223,0.0003672664,0.00029750285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989106,0.00022786447,0.00015568775,0.000067419554,0.0004808522,0.00015757364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014255173,0.00011167106,0.00011633794,0.00058182655,0.00025338464,0.00030102904,0.00031210753,0.00024567993,0.000044945537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006264028,0.00011708006,0.00005181432,0.0021240495,0.000025850008,0.0010669399,0.000016799659,0.0012308405,0.000022616612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017220901,0.000048233695,0.01843548,0.00037837127,0.000044949487,9.631473e-8,0.04136724,0.00070236623,0.00015543195,0.86811584,0.0704335,0.00031678122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115628885,0.000007885512,0.037259843,0.00050624815,0.000085855136,0.0000018455027,0.014948579,0.0060336,0.00009265413,0.0010572186,0.9395482,0.0003424267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037972253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022590121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8691147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004322477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003859435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403764105","doi":"10.24908/pceea.2023.17131","title":"Moving on from the Consultation Model to the Consent Model in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.024146846355327354,"score_gpt":0.281717221584241,"score_spread":0.25757037522891363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403764105","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30231118,0.000109534245,0.00009674753,0.67145854,0.0030637954,0.0008134128,0.00012266578,0.00005095391,0.021973154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98998535,0.000013943297,0.0002777152,0.0054585864,0.0002157188,0.000099944526,0.0000077417235,0.000014631547,0.0039263554],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885094,0.000023613135,0.00025133803,0.00016156095,0.0004707173,0.00024181079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983828,0.0007590125,0.00014759107,0.000098561504,0.00048660397,0.00012541898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093879714,0.000094087736,0.000080059384,0.00014123798,0.00045031126,0.0003526247,0.0003704859,0.00006736926,0.000028564118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067238607,0.00006992771,0.000033926084,0.0010884219,0.00001925141,0.00028523593,0.000014819719,0.0004033989,0.0000124454355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032572186,0.000027725602,0.0075213285,0.000029061463,0.00004842778,6.2786235e-8,0.06050962,0.17179227,0.00019222412,0.30270356,0.45554295,0.0016295377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014912532,0.0000060678367,0.036875945,0.00039740518,0.0000660713,5.0662715e-7,0.02788214,0.47478896,0.00020398526,0.0038218037,0.4554323,0.0003757016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97641486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99493366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68767416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071203224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023594221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99669117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403810560","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4999654","title":"New Crossroads and the Opportunity for a Crisis: The State of Canadian Legal Education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Legal education; Political science; Public administration; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02550651181511725,"score_gpt":0.359556000938361,"score_spread":0.3340494891232437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403810560","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019999525,0.0076314146,0.0023439443,0.9449082,0.0014610353,0.00043617393,0.0000085092215,0.000016030323,0.023195192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96993744,0.0038398409,0.000069111,0.0016204709,0.0005550403,0.00001531708,0.0000020937373,0.0000064691794,0.023954231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889094,0.00017360752,0.00016553064,0.0000682431,0.00014239365,0.0005592671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926084,0.00025599808,0.000084468375,0.00007563603,0.00019618464,0.00012687709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004731344,0.00004760323,0.000057500794,0.00016083046,0.0009186717,0.0005433815,0.00017825223,0.000025081787,0.00006274545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006291305,0.000028090924,0.000046112542,0.0005973519,0.00013056796,0.00047727412,0.0000054761545,0.00095562206,0.0000029827142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013512079,0.0000063670586,0.000010968897,0.000002223826,0.000038884595,5.6241912e-8,0.013512941,0.000001071021,0.0000019965255,0.8856714,0.029153174,0.07158742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008361868,0.000014862112,0.00004415745,0.0000046070413,0.000020124317,0.000018305534,0.03132149,0.000011924932,0.000002446626,0.386558,0.58189446,0.000026023401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6330316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8233749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9499379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037216936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1116866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8933493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403890106","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2024.2408074","title":"Shifting perspectives: the potential of rich, ill-structured problems in legal education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Sociology; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02077861452057169,"score_gpt":0.3496164388134905,"score_spread":0.32883782429291886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403890106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27812445,0.0012527475,0.00007932081,0.28426167,0.0013759688,0.0004598129,0.0000024118801,0.000073802235,0.4343698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907204,0.000016975031,0.000079673424,0.0006272463,0.0005587556,0.000026762491,0.0000021742153,0.0000071911777,0.007960841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907875,0.000335632,0.00015187403,0.00011142612,0.00019923692,0.00012309875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995239,0.00013715879,0.00006170062,0.00014379037,0.00011706168,0.000016413933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012169314,0.00005307822,0.00005347881,0.000040570983,0.0003401927,0.00023587173,0.00022132417,0.000046214147,0.0005052563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033220832,0.00003141002,0.000032014617,0.0006269527,0.00028155575,0.00043840415,0.000018168048,0.0004233891,0.000023790402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018117504,0.0000498433,0.00009601943,0.000005745015,0.000011900724,1.0771105e-7,0.2021337,0.000023174633,0.00020659067,0.79196066,0.002628014,0.0028824217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060219863,0.000008884936,0.004011224,0.000034946963,0.000031193227,0.000002707909,0.30056196,0.00010689635,0.0000379655,0.033589885,0.66146433,0.000089792244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028710695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006924085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7583708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098901655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007417601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403967218","doi":"10.1177/2755323x241296683","title":"Putting the Bar to the Test: An Examination of the Predictive Validity of Bar Exam Outcomes on Lawyering Effectiveness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of law & empirical analysis.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Test (biology); Predictive validity; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Geography; Geology","score_opus":0.1091205595821231,"score_gpt":0.45004372911236307,"score_spread":0.34092316953023993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403967218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9181201,0.000052938907,0.0010453522,0.07206557,0.0005395312,0.00022303965,0.00001201238,0.000012060823,0.00792941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871004,0.000009223251,0.00011539968,0.0007978166,0.00025007184,0.000005368892,5.768106e-7,0.0000052115665,0.000106305066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967159,0.001769001,0.00048428713,0.00012033987,0.0007897602,0.000120704695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921529,0.0065836604,0.0004059407,0.0002203281,0.0005734126,0.00006371975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072034616,0.00008324853,0.00025062275,0.00012443615,0.00048657006,0.00015301009,0.0004661517,0.000052608433,0.000088334775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049308934,0.000037469006,0.00029548685,0.0019489761,0.00019971492,0.00047355736,0.00004196289,0.00044782905,0.0000042349748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010704764,0.0020049564,0.44789714,0.000119777185,0.003889291,0.000012298213,0.17156544,0.032483898,0.0022017774,0.31126785,0.0025327408,0.0259178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006687799,0.00018547315,0.96415937,0.000063287116,0.0008760556,0.0000020151906,0.0031168184,0.00065973186,0.00061281346,0.0022794637,0.027921703,0.000056405803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006965406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006884709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51626223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012698375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028755682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5903096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404006113","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v9i5.2936","title":"IPDLN Workshop: Opportunities for Cross-Country Comparisons of Linked Administrative Education and Health Data","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Population Data Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Business","score_opus":0.6097572420545042,"score_gpt":0.6301518757336448,"score_spread":0.020394633679140628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404006113","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05769012,0.0034585753,0.16056223,0.6932512,0.05607483,0.002966116,0.016375856,0.00021367648,0.009407396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97278345,0.00042949317,0.019259878,0.000800777,0.0013148111,0.000020004727,0.0035347089,0.000009187378,0.001847723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982152,0.000052346553,0.00053711096,0.00033849152,0.0006748549,0.00018196876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972635,0.0005437472,0.00043109598,0.000352557,0.0012615505,0.0001475474],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052258754,0.000077217475,0.00011020646,0.00034803152,0.0010345321,0.0020401708,0.0016004698,0.00004251521,0.000051943774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032294462,0.00007524649,0.000021236123,0.00045184023,0.00046531204,0.008451267,0.0001825141,0.00019289904,0.0000011238718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044723558,0.0001860087,0.005635922,0.000045984452,0.00005564289,5.3628344e-7,0.004116796,0.000029735802,0.000030378906,0.7369092,0.1460339,0.10691116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001583469,0.000034995308,0.011503168,0.00015625861,0.000018552146,0.000021509075,0.012402685,0.011177073,0.0000047475887,0.0062609566,0.95815015,0.00011153224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014349199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016415982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9150933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019771094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008103829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404393661","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4973518","title":"&lt;span&gt;Ontario, Listen Up: Citational Practices in The Ontario Court of Appeal&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Span (engineering); Life span; Appeal; Political science; Engineering; Law; Structural engineering; Gerontology; Medicine","score_opus":0.037797862396898495,"score_gpt":0.35155115464220116,"score_spread":0.3137532922453027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404393661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52603513,0.010458156,0.0017685397,0.22756977,0.008009504,0.0020926623,0.00008707571,0.00029940731,0.22367974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369766,0.0026514851,0.00054254255,0.001307444,0.0019196683,0.0001106885,0.000118644,0.000082652026,0.056290273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901294,0.0014642087,0.0016991999,0.0008871103,0.0027176773,0.003102364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936139,0.002231393,0.0019307814,0.0006569853,0.0012010068,0.00036592872],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012651277,0.00062631676,0.00069455185,0.00087899657,0.0018719806,0.0018110429,0.0017802543,0.0004941453,0.0034535062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002859541,0.0005386814,0.00045867165,0.0027219388,0.00055077905,0.0040847287,0.00013086828,0.007269541,0.0003777703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039922254,0.0010882086,0.011854716,0.00007571531,0.0010079101,0.000050348823,0.1318793,0.00031677826,0.001032109,0.7931308,0.04984114,0.009323753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009942007,0.00039001164,0.019454757,0.00018013593,0.00036039492,0.0003517566,0.02245641,0.00019151055,0.000024895227,0.050823946,0.90409887,0.0006730974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13202314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92782754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85425776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067215073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05402996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404469182","doi":"10.29173/alr2803","title":"Edmonton Area Black Undergraduate Students' Intentions and Views Regarding Applying to Law School","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Psychology; Mathematics education; Political science","score_opus":0.0751593882649,"score_gpt":0.42529999803086893,"score_spread":0.35014060976596895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404469182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005541864,0.021909725,0.00017549176,0.25835606,0.0006590079,0.0013596377,0.0000025449347,0.00008233397,0.716901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8304896,0.06865277,0.00057547435,0.05178495,0.00041584173,0.00063630834,0.000024114652,0.000039788396,0.047381192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849117,0.00023502683,0.00036105164,0.0003022149,0.00038168873,0.00022886065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988348,0.00048901787,0.00007354286,0.00024041106,0.00014350117,0.00021876657],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001259341,0.00012415317,0.00021855938,0.000050711762,0.00060672464,0.0009766362,0.00023849499,0.000045887104,0.00062274875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012331357,0.00010923322,0.00008435612,0.00087102567,0.00014091094,0.0010430792,0.000076481054,0.00029002686,0.0010455425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.392984e-7,0.000025875373,0.000089415575,0.00036132993,0.000037385515,0.0000011056707,0.0013343391,2.6659023e-7,0.000015927473,0.95092964,0.04353568,0.003668266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039330735,0.00000891494,0.00003799433,0.0028868355,0.00011035776,0.0000027566448,0.00041887682,0.0000033908652,0.0000025534887,0.003154459,0.99319625,0.00013828737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029655745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09604598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94966054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011990759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020820087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404534635","doi":"10.29242/lawstats.2023","title":"ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 2023","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ARL academic law and medical library statistics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Library science; Academic library; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.028824778185312427,"score_gpt":0.3509910157347867,"score_spread":0.32216623754947427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404534635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000037146513,0.0055984072,0.0011152466,0.071948305,0.0038747087,0.00053158693,0.011278362,0.000519854,0.9051298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001699602,0.04126932,0.0076704943,0.065759964,0.005941458,0.00005061671,0.0057591693,0.00018045392,0.87319857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946287,0.00045085367,0.0013413698,0.00084229914,0.001870578,0.00086617685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926672,0.004914931,0.0005136148,0.0003451457,0.00009155115,0.0014675731],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091808644,0.0005687799,0.0006840649,0.00021055118,0.00084549654,0.00061737956,0.0011038431,0.0028013557,0.015611596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015633424,0.0005443934,0.000085637475,0.00051904086,0.0029010247,0.0031311074,0.00052092393,0.009891306,0.0015257429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009921849,0.000014860358,0.000014483994,0.00016977964,0.000054552394,0.00007613195,0.0010649011,5.6048602e-8,1.8573799e-7,0.5029485,0.49033356,0.005313049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014031488,0.00003258296,0.0000066020643,0.00039584437,0.00013749916,0.000013305155,0.00021293575,0.000043511118,0.0000013909596,0.41372094,0.5849197,0.00037539253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061395025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018939692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09458615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106589316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010620852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404562400","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4976805","title":"Some Reflections of a Métis Law Student and Assistant Professor on Indigenous Legal Education in Canada&amp;nbsp;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal education; Law; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Engineering; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.022902221761463833,"score_gpt":0.4060017546048774,"score_spread":0.3830995328434136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404562400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9302798,0.0038703375,0.0000422585,0.045559935,0.0019000213,0.00029238392,0.0000058245528,0.000019533052,0.018029893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990313,0.0017543823,0.000036795478,0.00047013492,0.0003842185,0.000018007495,0.0000032433645,0.0000089459345,0.0070112897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982852,0.00021229888,0.0002789038,0.00013092892,0.0003597784,0.0007329295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948406,0.00013156924,0.00011582318,0.000077548466,0.00012420204,0.000066777866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016582477,0.00007385912,0.00009864555,0.00020226311,0.00052648335,0.00019201731,0.00012331309,0.000045131314,0.000034216057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012489314,0.00006979783,0.000024572744,0.0005559844,0.000057381127,0.00057912944,0.000010209035,0.0016667651,0.0000055506057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116849005,0.00014598168,0.00071291445,0.000007349484,0.00004052584,0.0000011696368,0.011202089,0.000003926798,0.00005843405,0.9805473,0.00042110225,0.0068475325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002688847,0.00020044873,0.007531381,0.00014326352,0.000052481788,0.00010488863,0.14317343,0.0000029743253,0.000040550556,0.18024746,0.667996,0.00023825341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8789171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99721044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8002998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048598265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12045895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404590355","doi":"10.1007/978-981-97-5085-6_85","title":"Meeting in the White Space: The Discourse of First Nations Client and Legal Practitioner Relations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White spaces; White (mutation); White paper; Space (punctuation); Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Linguistics; Law; Computer science; Telecommunications; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032732649370273176,"score_gpt":0.36097681510623336,"score_spread":0.32824416573596016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404590355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042952994,0.00014855084,0.00002007747,0.35234585,0.0002768913,0.00027746378,0.000017602628,0.000014649349,0.64685595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21258612,0.00034337043,0.00014321036,0.00043868902,0.0002769511,0.000040480816,0.000025314785,0.00001217782,0.7861337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988956,0.000088085886,0.0003171491,0.00016859127,0.0004166506,0.00011393886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771184,0.0016046441,0.00025324806,0.00020371587,0.00019896185,0.000027592834],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014428303,0.00010625131,0.00009758617,0.00022569759,0.0011331021,0.00035504228,0.00017556705,0.00012913391,0.0013992718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010454447,0.00006452861,0.000055741304,0.00035824731,0.0004114187,0.0005549906,0.000035775425,0.0007290732,0.00008713447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010542498,0.000027248756,0.000103151346,0.000008852739,0.000017894148,9.134843e-7,0.021784035,0.00002044182,1.5791967e-7,0.9562101,0.02176854,0.00005761672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034866418,0.0000064014175,0.00019131367,0.000097365075,0.000066787296,0.0000032888186,0.03461997,0.000022749087,1.6745078e-7,0.020513944,0.94436085,0.00008227765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002805465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13061374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9356961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007961027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005401417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404635481","doi":"10.4324/9781003473404-13","title":"Legal Education and First Nations Teaching and Learning Methodologies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.10114485852844146,"score_gpt":0.4391834204610289,"score_spread":0.3380385619325874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404635481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003396273,0.0010565049,0.000169644,0.05849072,0.0008329718,0.00014724123,0.0000025198242,0.00014834445,0.9391181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010535652,0.0011037797,0.011593562,0.00043835165,0.00050366356,0.000015972524,0.000020183148,0.000017456117,0.97577137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991756,0.000144486,0.00017363556,0.00023656078,0.00016585022,0.0001038644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699086,0.0026349276,0.00010858937,0.00007584373,0.00012837337,0.000061382525],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016552561,0.000117756346,0.00011592585,0.0003245884,0.0022732697,0.00076095876,0.00006982233,0.00019003976,0.00069807115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004744476,0.000114173265,0.000026810256,0.00006987905,0.00019219072,0.00061887567,0.00005074927,0.0013964627,0.000066732166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.353957e-7,0.0000052980085,0.000009101722,0.00002840751,0.00001937005,2.4925512e-7,0.010237023,5.6828253e-7,8.2289e-7,0.9526221,0.007830606,0.029245798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015226657,0.000009014795,0.000021521302,0.00007039506,0.000046010267,0.0000047729086,0.011044773,0.0000044425265,2.9795888e-7,0.07123952,0.9174176,0.00012640691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068597207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011497259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.909587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008200935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008240116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404682251","doi":"10.1002/9781119880967.ch23","title":"The Valuator as Expert Witness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Expert witness; History; Computer science; Archaeology; Programming language","score_opus":0.057305365356286025,"score_gpt":0.468042303107103,"score_spread":0.410736937750817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404682251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.8549872e-7,0.0013095841,0.000016852353,0.19131948,0.003484022,0.00012631612,0.0000013770547,0.00019091809,0.80355126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00012780057,0.0005756246,0.000081055754,0.0044505093,0.0018009108,0.00005040848,0.0000025542813,0.00009442004,0.9928167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992942,0.00010153279,0.00008163052,0.000120481534,0.00028227744,0.00011987963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953336,0.00014535313,0.00005544259,0.00016964473,0.000053603326,0.00004261597],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051158475,0.000064723994,0.000051312654,0.000055152475,0.000283057,0.00045553368,0.00021256795,0.000120754,0.048333567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005326728,0.000039692768,0.00003035398,0.00033304162,0.00018666552,0.00007171869,0.000016597982,0.00021757992,0.0151357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.072641e-7,0.000004122706,2.579946e-7,9.735671e-7,0.000009981641,1.9961726e-7,0.0019483106,1.1120515e-9,1.2163656e-7,0.43948063,0.55689174,0.0016634641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012309702,0.000002034322,3.7195906e-7,0.000015504342,0.000006991515,2.5837517e-7,0.007697511,2.2942866e-7,9.805494e-7,0.010287603,0.98190993,0.00006624792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026870077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010544754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42919305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004164276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011280044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9856311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405049608","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4982650","title":"Navigating the Current Era of AI Arbitrage: Reimagining Academic Integrity and Assessment in Ontario Secondary Schools","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Arbitrage; Current (fluid); Political science; Business; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Finance; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.04161397451041256,"score_gpt":0.4392034195800189,"score_spread":0.39758944506960636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405049608","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4004887,0.010803451,0.0003550307,0.57590234,0.003285357,0.00045075646,0.000007327842,0.000030311967,0.0086767115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99143064,0.006902111,0.00031885155,0.00038707035,0.0005853294,0.00002609532,0.000009744328,0.000014670936,0.0003255055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969697,0.000591717,0.0006889087,0.00028051256,0.0004944454,0.0009746932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986967,0.00026946867,0.00054628524,0.00016377681,0.00024715156,0.00007664468],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010319062,0.00017734736,0.00024517716,0.00008987354,0.00045075367,0.0004918449,0.0004729391,0.00020945718,0.000103611856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005845767,0.00013007913,0.00009416011,0.0003689405,0.00016072314,0.00046669808,0.00026794535,0.41580632,0.0000050257013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010179784,0.000052005937,0.019649187,0.00005219979,0.00011281689,0.0000016271705,0.027754195,0.000018888088,0.000013558823,0.7293279,0.00039085897,0.22261655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014345293,0.000025092653,0.007541942,0.0010377183,0.000061206694,0.00003008916,0.018415457,0.00006180108,0.000004001361,0.94193006,0.030581497,0.00016770679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30352983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60065645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5909419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040261806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27032855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979717},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4405178205","doi":"10.4000/12vgj","title":"Les cliniques juridiques : l’expérience canadienne","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses universitaires de Caen eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08813849555426706,"score_gpt":0.3380029707925124,"score_spread":0.24986447523824534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405178205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003987813,0.0010816519,0.00020113244,0.025335226,0.0010247073,0.00039313745,0.00012506735,0.00020200854,0.9676493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.674164,0.00048107858,0.0010602225,0.00045914316,0.00056034076,0.000009065839,0.000048958547,0.00004620834,0.323171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974798,0.00033604703,0.00044637563,0.0005691731,0.0004409984,0.00072761584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99625605,0.0006962042,0.0005819449,0.00047222723,0.0013056966,0.00068790163],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086445233,0.00044024474,0.0004085115,0.0002876812,0.0011569494,0.00025594424,0.0009109015,0.0006266737,0.003108666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005706529,0.0005223984,0.0001791299,0.0000972687,0.0017696318,0.0009078092,0.00021305229,0.0010634166,0.00016896718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035296558,0.0000317562,0.00019475068,0.000048183694,0.00012541044,0.00009091949,0.024067912,0.000010860588,0.000017574102,0.8486741,0.016899234,0.109804004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014211537,0.00010184035,0.000076851196,0.00019211322,0.00023566622,0.000016378923,0.0060494505,0.00001549073,0.000065195665,0.08762693,0.9049605,0.0005174744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2068331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15392698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8880613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017091429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052942387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405359142","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5018397","title":"\"Weaponizing\" The Tort of Family Violence? Myths, Stereotypes, Lawyers' Ethics and Access to Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Mythology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.07574901194883561,"score_gpt":0.4355450685629814,"score_spread":0.3597960566141458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405359142","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26287097,0.025490085,0.009024947,0.6280228,0.0049741603,0.00060625334,0.000011577389,0.0001163278,0.0688829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98118544,0.013674507,0.00008720609,0.002577067,0.0005911035,0.0000051155757,7.397499e-7,0.000009010069,0.0018698053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998268,0.0003447944,0.0002137518,0.00012667554,0.00037661378,0.00067015603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998693,0.00078223454,0.00008672988,0.00010220934,0.00026012908,0.000075734555],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061990637,0.00007148018,0.00008090288,0.00010315769,0.00091342354,0.0006291147,0.00037533758,0.00008186015,0.00004957201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014297873,0.000052487765,0.000034466077,0.00068233255,0.00013400805,0.0007442505,0.000042043328,0.0035195476,0.000022070266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013499246,0.0000189814,0.00013695649,0.00001652577,0.000053160187,8.78074e-7,0.02121289,0.0000050036265,0.000076744356,0.93759215,0.0022258114,0.038647417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099284145,0.000110494555,0.0009930036,0.00016701769,0.00014871053,0.000048656584,0.13477635,0.000024473866,0.00003144291,0.14777207,0.71567625,0.0001522233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025083814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069717853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7898201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032126173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0119662965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405479803","doi":"10.1177/23220058241305560","title":"Legal Education in India: Reflecting on the Past for a Brighter Future","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.035701113182877095,"score_gpt":0.43717639966324,"score_spread":0.4014752864803629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405479803","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08584591,0.0005517471,0.00019740713,0.6613929,0.015877098,0.0005253383,0.0000029972919,0.000024699373,0.23558186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785923,0.000033037217,0.0009506559,0.0030825678,0.009654488,0.000049872073,0.000008161439,0.000016323245,0.0076125977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986184,0.00027064024,0.0004486341,0.00014631756,0.00031708405,0.00019887158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863374,0.00034404057,0.0003054117,0.00012599373,0.0005013371,0.00008948145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001816938,0.00010214395,0.00011192558,0.00046999787,0.00042673424,0.0008675432,0.00024103926,0.00009484498,0.00019498394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008829508,0.00007634008,0.00009740825,0.0010507741,0.00006015413,0.0018267339,0.000005776507,0.0007950301,0.00003072796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003053148,0.00028649,0.00046938864,0.000021787393,0.000020331297,0.0000013330887,0.026777368,0.0000013874353,0.000050354738,0.7054185,0.13472825,0.13219427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007535113,0.00006796519,0.006270827,0.00017497175,0.000023781304,0.000037096997,0.057639256,0.0000037861157,0.000037780024,0.0052014193,0.9303797,0.00008807697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047651125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000390841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8927464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004274726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013415032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99217796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405519041","doi":"10.4236/blr.2024.154127","title":"Perception of Justice Delivery in the Court System in Ghana","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Beijing Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Perception; Economic Justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.07699804443303314,"score_gpt":0.41390175758178893,"score_spread":0.3369037131487558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405519041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045273975,0.12032522,0.00012034606,0.15587725,0.00214674,0.0015891959,0.000008534501,0.00012388584,0.67453486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98923206,0.00827146,0.0001369356,0.002071276,0.00010704813,0.000029960887,0.0000031263667,0.0000031481566,0.00014498846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899644,0.00040305866,0.00024502588,0.00008409373,0.0001866038,0.00008478654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994117,0.00036658917,0.000051039307,0.00009560716,0.00006260869,0.000012471054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029186448,0.000037484973,0.00009688738,0.00004369441,0.00009830589,0.000070262104,0.00012988977,0.00002834649,0.00011557565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032446886,0.000027804852,0.000029877961,0.00088808726,0.00004869524,0.00032169485,0.000006778447,0.00017893108,0.00008111366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.6315224e-7,0.00002232706,0.00007066402,0.0031100533,0.0000025002375,0.0000030008541,0.008627463,9.373563e-7,0.0000066812254,0.97236186,0.0038833574,0.011910578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027015134,0.0000060969137,0.00036692835,0.0069847563,0.00006823562,0.000003108241,0.031086331,0.000052712985,2.632373e-7,0.00007714947,0.96127427,0.000053110416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007677861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027151436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97228473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011462213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024143775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405659549","doi":"10.29173/isotl800","title":"An OT and PT Explore SoTL: The Start of a Transformative Journey in Decolonizing Curriculum in a School of Rehabilitation Science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Imagining SoTL","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Rehabilitation; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04333970387838407,"score_gpt":0.4328885105014542,"score_spread":0.3895488066230701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405659549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95721453,0.00015977229,0.00010752786,0.03916127,0.00018225393,0.00018656108,0.0000021541807,0.000016738943,0.002969181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817955,0.000026772912,0.0016432382,0.00008760615,0.000024005101,0.000023621675,7.491826e-7,0.0000036879167,0.00001076739],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990113,0.00019858281,0.00027642818,0.00012251317,0.00024941834,0.00014175326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999071,0.00052401645,0.000077659184,0.00008412574,0.00020048523,0.000042700525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003187655,0.000045784403,0.00008054091,0.00033374253,0.00016609475,0.0001781326,0.00015171802,0.000021451142,0.000049112645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024122621,0.00003711717,0.00001502764,0.0019281761,0.000631748,0.0027670637,0.000010185999,0.00027809723,0.0000026511989],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000087731705,0.00010581436,0.08579874,0.000044509794,0.0000036418865,8.30363e-7,0.8571151,0.000044106404,0.001849751,0.04821989,0.00016778398,0.0066410704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002998575,0.00014021198,0.09845437,0.00041564822,0.000011151067,0.000002052514,0.87897265,0.00406356,0.00065972755,0.0076547577,0.009197448,0.00012857295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053910078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029337886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04096501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001027622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014022331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8149627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405700575","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-56681-3_101","title":"Limits of Consent Education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.13035408207445856,"score_gpt":0.4357227866533086,"score_spread":0.30536870457885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405700575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005530783,0.00042867576,0.0000056769327,0.04710458,0.0022768392,0.00014904237,0.0000075485236,0.000045233133,0.94997686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058937264,0.00043576828,0.00021711472,0.0008913471,0.0005018433,0.0000061967407,0.000023162227,0.000011872878,0.992019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993753,0.000012638019,0.00020692595,0.00011915264,0.00022078473,0.00006520227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991122,0.00022851408,0.00013920097,0.00012485085,0.00034818018,0.000047042446],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023928835,0.000071390066,0.00009151345,0.00015089585,0.00008962682,0.00007511144,0.00009539071,0.00015209823,0.011276331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023650938,0.0000694777,0.0000535079,0.00007189549,0.00014583168,0.00012644584,0.000009521454,0.00025447627,0.0013304283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.4181813e-7,0.000015749982,0.000001487851,0.00001950036,0.000014665086,1.11299066e-7,0.0018556622,2.8464084e-8,0.0000026189894,0.80284613,0.19035436,0.004889048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008490961,0.0000049813916,0.0000026307816,0.00006877139,0.00003019829,4.2652175e-7,0.0011405105,1.4101461e-7,0.000008099027,0.14648579,0.85218495,0.00006500611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021925431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023579411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6618306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000828541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062456205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405959047","doi":"10.29173/wclawr119","title":"No Contest Pleas as a Response to False Guilty Pleas","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.060169899870502426,"score_gpt":0.4297966942832729,"score_spread":0.36962679441277047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405959047","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016412163,0.022690445,0.000106322834,0.5722315,0.0028655569,0.0013829779,0.000019316063,0.0003717289,0.39869094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6671039,0.022104554,0.00025788532,0.14837314,0.0020150002,0.00067197613,0.000037322032,0.00006543868,0.15937077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997422,0.001222812,0.00040407886,0.00027469904,0.00041745085,0.00025896437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975437,0.0011803965,0.000103502185,0.000468751,0.0005320407,0.00017163117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045561776,0.00013988581,0.00019999886,0.000060531464,0.0008436595,0.00048626185,0.00038230058,0.00006541498,0.006859714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058877813,0.00010369317,0.00010374046,0.0013956906,0.00021558808,0.0006780514,0.000047767448,0.00039923363,0.021588929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056712808,0.000031241263,0.0000057340985,0.00012478862,0.000028711058,0.0000031879865,0.0025993718,8.294138e-7,0.000095290394,0.83443063,0.1572009,0.0054226145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000609558,0.000047975573,0.00007490845,0.0008289182,0.00007126597,0.000012460809,0.00047177172,0.0000070538595,0.0000097734255,0.0009975055,0.9972813,0.00013608839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008442187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017922071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84008044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000214505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010598579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99816066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406095612","doi":"10.5325/weslmethstud.17.1.0104","title":"Our Justice Journeys: Three Centuries of Striving for a Better World","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wesley and Methodist Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; History; Law","score_opus":0.2368833403269247,"score_gpt":0.5457135377945687,"score_spread":0.30883019746764395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406095612","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012703545,0.0113049485,0.043049473,0.68782866,0.0047917077,0.0009265771,0.000041864245,0.00008664224,0.2392666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9261311,0.0011639175,0.05659448,0.0042357757,0.000440464,0.00008810251,0.0000027587562,0.0000058656806,0.011337479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929816,0.00015242484,0.00019823131,0.00011449891,0.00009708749,0.00013957554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977661,0.0016813944,0.00011977636,0.00007497408,0.0003310344,0.000026754657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014523278,0.00006420971,0.00016607341,0.00011582815,0.00089701277,0.0000657799,0.000076738805,0.000028388806,0.000010885327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053255847,0.000055314325,0.000037150166,0.00043827912,0.00015461947,0.00023025846,0.000036982357,0.00011294611,7.2435546e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000288826,0.000053858443,0.006511805,0.0002371136,0.00020631352,1.8618647e-7,0.0269775,0.0000010643117,0.00006268977,0.8798971,0.06004947,0.025974007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019849878,0.000012002736,0.004984014,0.000063563,0.00024709117,1.11190346e-7,0.11104256,0.0000030997803,0.00019574499,0.033724736,0.84945035,0.00007821036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003750538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036202485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9134276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002885388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019163676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68991876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406268348","doi":"10.4337/9781035302932.ch15","title":"Canada (regulation of legal education)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Legal education; Indigenous; Legal research; Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Ecology","score_opus":0.019834298758379682,"score_gpt":0.28986713939985415,"score_spread":0.2700328406414745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406268348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011871272,0.00010370274,0.000034351357,0.035721574,0.004718147,0.00030535136,0.000058442638,0.00006102368,0.9589855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017877726,0.000010332339,0.00051063753,0.0030215764,0.0012403541,0.000018648145,0.00019253713,0.00002453554,0.97710365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980235,0.00008628184,0.00052599097,0.0002933217,0.0008423144,0.00022856273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970815,0.00037730925,0.00061285996,0.0003902356,0.0014045362,0.00013354955],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084877055,0.00019390664,0.00025616717,0.00033929702,0.00048195885,0.0010720931,0.0005382954,0.00035667486,0.0014473334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019990809,0.00022682674,0.000089763744,0.00011582698,0.00016428369,0.0014231645,0.00006367455,0.00086816016,0.00001302545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022796737,0.000007132914,0.000006021381,0.000019210114,0.000024080347,2.1660352e-7,0.0005528165,5.180051e-7,0.0000014750227,0.5462114,0.42984125,0.02333358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055555516,0.0000045976094,0.000091734786,0.00014313406,0.00004445259,6.777046e-7,0.00044551495,0.0000012373463,0.000015849382,0.022257997,0.97674274,0.00019651082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86817634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8745041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54690146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077528687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07476619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406325040","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9066","title":"JUDGING ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES: OVERSIGHT, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND CITIZEN COMPLAINTS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Public administration; Political science; Administrative law; Citizen science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.16068306877390293,"score_gpt":0.4724398080745329,"score_spread":0.31175673930062997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406325040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3416592,0.00021840725,0.00037292344,0.046654567,0.0013328735,0.0006162299,0.000053714695,0.00015616298,0.60893595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99576735,0.000027743072,0.0005944704,0.0013914201,0.00037715377,0.000015605026,0.000004993636,0.000010697331,0.0018105501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989103,0.00010446188,0.00021952378,0.00025025537,0.00032478414,0.00019066675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985537,0.0008810296,0.00006797099,0.00014760056,0.00021954284,0.00013015833],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000654217,0.00009202756,0.0001319881,0.00017529553,0.00030382886,0.0007275012,0.00029473717,0.00006734497,0.001373423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008760641,0.000093947456,0.000029717108,0.0006566046,0.00022068007,0.0014488708,0.00009987604,0.00023365025,0.00010359641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016582833,0.00034620785,0.019292127,0.0011062946,0.00022712638,0.000023910834,0.23333712,0.00003856599,0.00093429524,0.6019589,0.12767054,0.0148991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025362443,0.00010110744,0.03735592,0.00027847145,0.00030665527,0.0000052924943,0.051401462,0.00013812225,0.0004964705,0.004158543,0.9051046,0.00039975403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017305611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007127828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77743405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009704583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326516","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8359","title":"Exploring the Importance of Criminal Legal Aid: A Canadian Perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Criminal procedure; Humanities; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2401937323696118,"score_gpt":0.4306052977341825,"score_spread":0.19041156536457068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6011063,0.000030652853,0.000017864122,0.08442041,0.0009869827,0.0003555858,0.000021091719,0.000046028472,0.31301507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961131,0.000025686908,0.00018355357,0.0013484992,0.00047811103,0.00004420569,0.0000018644503,0.000009251714,0.0017956936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989759,0.00008271678,0.00020590663,0.00014186851,0.00032522067,0.00026840754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987171,0.0003436194,0.00012714602,0.00019797926,0.00047822358,0.00013589514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080237025,0.000062938256,0.000101162776,0.00021344103,0.00038883733,0.0001303101,0.0005066317,0.000028759565,0.0003508024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023024264,0.000056545457,0.000035372836,0.0015736189,0.00014364568,0.0011911648,0.000051467287,0.00019143602,0.00008469617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042366748,0.00004535869,0.008055751,0.000059703983,0.00004882446,0.000009098947,0.14216459,0.00037074464,0.00013207323,0.81183326,0.036285926,0.0009522699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017649792,0.000054108557,0.20484528,0.00007225922,0.00023001811,0.0000014941021,0.3267412,0.000029946348,0.00041273245,0.0021366037,0.465067,0.00023287405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46368104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3263125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8096967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014745603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019870484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6859805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326534","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9184","title":"Access to Administrative Justice as an Administrative Law Value: Designing an Inclusive and Accessible Administrative Justice System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Administrative law; Tribunal; Equity (law); Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Law; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1772834996338298,"score_gpt":0.5093142697938282,"score_spread":0.3320307701599984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17249353,0.00037801187,0.009159043,0.035238925,0.004569073,0.0046697296,0.00048066585,0.00085229054,0.77215874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98400944,0.000033761557,0.007471747,0.0046051014,0.0017223451,0.0002981655,0.000045889014,0.00007903785,0.0017345074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465036,0.0011248322,0.0009865488,0.0012520681,0.0011951617,0.0007910168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99375194,0.0024656819,0.00050421734,0.0006294224,0.001419886,0.0012288262],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021196469,0.0005347543,0.00060139,0.0005590712,0.0019513471,0.005267492,0.0018804654,0.0003405792,0.0004832504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029331066,0.0005549125,0.00008804881,0.0026089041,0.00059577305,0.0110315075,0.0005002122,0.0008979994,0.00017142044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006100367,0.00048074115,0.00009903535,0.0017773517,0.00018737893,0.00014909008,0.116125025,0.00021424404,0.0010210724,0.8733978,0.0040917974,0.0018464219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001381227,0.0048821094,0.005417972,0.0030660136,0.009122657,0.00012794125,0.7807041,0.0014930939,0.02066866,0.007901416,0.16206433,0.003170502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005792257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041447054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8654964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004513117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005405984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406523653","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0004","title":"When judges are not judging","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.024763917333902312,"score_gpt":0.3087551784044162,"score_spread":0.28399126107051387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406523653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008052153,0.00014816104,0.0006172245,0.082054846,0.0005665498,0.000040262817,0.0000026674552,0.000017879376,0.90850025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977427,0.00015756604,0.0018482426,0.0009638839,0.00010944958,2.0529782e-8,6.256177e-7,0.000001430586,0.019491754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951494,0.00010684964,0.00007413702,0.000055365992,0.0001509826,0.00009771326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993723,0.00008888791,0.0001424495,0.000065007065,0.00027689672,0.00005445369],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041612523,0.00003221566,0.000066613466,0.00002623051,0.0012989837,0.00007508615,0.00021215033,0.00004141623,0.0042446144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014502573,0.00003816491,0.000043607666,0.00005357958,0.00014064614,0.0010715694,0.000024090476,0.00017379652,0.000009695729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002648106,0.000069798705,0.0044130613,0.000005240054,0.000046666963,0.0000049124305,0.028102957,0.000004413507,0.000044874898,0.88497883,0.07741783,0.0048849257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015193793,0.000005235681,0.0055292635,0.000020551503,0.000020385003,8.825462e-7,0.07130468,0.0000030896113,0.000016846123,0.0016601089,0.921249,0.000038069877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14950484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33281606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9693749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032891444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039334604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406568919","doi":"10.1016/s1521-6136(00)80044-5","title":"10.1016/s1521-6136(00)80044-5","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Franchise; Business; Legal service; Law and economics; Law; Marketing; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.02551660855024614,"score_gpt":0.27177744483322386,"score_spread":0.2462608362829777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406568919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.1264087e-7,0.00008736923,3.9011624e-7,0.016092665,0.00002337814,0.00033334072,0.000046160483,0.00016507594,0.9832515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000019457593,0.0000044881253,0.00008639237,0.0004931329,0.0011525414,0.000020961426,0.00008281991,0.000046054774,0.99811167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984957,0.000058181733,0.0003087257,0.00031465018,0.00053444016,0.0002882851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987627,0.00023275695,0.00017210997,0.00034993116,0.00025687803,0.00022560131],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048826853,0.00021636073,0.0002273555,0.00023549295,0.000532108,0.00034301105,0.00043722667,0.00033261973,0.999552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002863424,0.0002403452,0.000103758226,0.00017794008,0.00016715299,0.00035726436,0.0000394631,0.000591463,0.997401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013938334,0.000021664448,4.3575814e-9,0.0000028187844,0.000025029156,0.0000020654318,0.00045514744,0.0000010188439,3.3418496e-7,0.012973802,0.81633586,0.17016833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059848735,0.000032778244,5.9120765e-7,0.000031524916,0.000036250844,0.000001503081,0.0000141759965,6.201682e-7,5.923204e-7,0.0016972773,0.99782205,0.0003027747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008256628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024005487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18148622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019187969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011846239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98009926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406731095","doi":"10.23912/9781915097415-5861","title":"Ethics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Goodfellow Publishers eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.10702178542296618,"score_gpt":0.3805693031319851,"score_spread":0.2735475177090189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406731095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[9.767564e-7,0.00025315976,0.000012831885,0.07142532,0.0059685265,0.00032338538,0.000023090259,0.00041155858,0.92158115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008401421,0.000029494375,0.00019661905,0.0047417292,0.0020629477,0.000025921523,0.00007054692,0.00009124766,0.99194133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976761,0.000081427504,0.0004123746,0.0004854892,0.00096073817,0.0003838847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978806,0.00059962383,0.00024971366,0.000460699,0.0005576039,0.000251765],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001986286,0.00028955052,0.0002506684,0.00039706234,0.0007514966,0.004053373,0.00057768804,0.001267871,0.005796962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007295771,0.0003081495,0.00021409523,0.00010012635,0.00059061684,0.0011001127,0.00008933733,0.004301461,0.0028299657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016704159,0.0000044934964,4.4838026e-7,0.00002178794,0.000056085843,0.0000071651107,0.0106891785,8.895194e-8,7.56027e-7,0.6272996,0.35663113,0.0052875644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041388754,0.000009982717,2.2608127e-7,0.00007215777,0.00007462957,0.0000015949739,0.0014343936,5.893903e-7,0.0000014909092,0.2307594,0.7673335,0.00027066737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020771872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035006683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41070235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033794614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052800747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407222285","doi":"10.59962/9780774870757-004","title":"2 Building a Law Firm: The First Decade in Montreal","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.026282139443368456,"score_gpt":0.25884516207472746,"score_spread":0.232563022631359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407222285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004062928,0.00032349775,0.0000044296858,0.001433105,0.000316542,0.00034187964,0.00014487536,0.000049669095,0.9969797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037926145,0.00021314823,0.000095632764,0.00020662216,0.00011850682,0.0000010737716,0.000005891608,0.000014767089,0.9614182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990625,0.000037359398,0.00016782779,0.00025092918,0.000304095,0.00017730861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992174,0.00021715926,0.00016205522,0.00018349895,0.00016182275,0.00005807879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031133948,0.00007446792,0.00017699617,0.000047413592,0.0005837086,0.0004444933,0.0004623591,0.00025446064,0.0005686469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035325287,0.00014680346,0.000100866986,0.000031308962,0.0006561599,0.00019164989,0.00013092287,0.00064132386,0.000017650666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007523023,0.000021982241,0.00002273212,0.000054438748,0.00007128272,0.00013283134,0.009524692,0.0000029124076,3.4634166e-7,0.8140812,0.16209242,0.013987646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013442965,0.000008297548,0.00023607849,0.00035679707,0.00006779979,0.0000053408385,0.0008762803,0.0000061734104,1.352549e-7,0.02722204,0.9709431,0.00014351773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9443286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8088507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016223194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032095803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62262845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407555645","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-83483-7_3","title":"Values and Ethics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.12294717545024705,"score_gpt":0.4520533937475798,"score_spread":0.3291062182973328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407555645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[4.3182993e-7,0.00014167256,0.000045783778,0.14181261,0.00046379177,0.0000690701,0.0000032248026,0.000042374628,0.85742104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00019091419,0.0010894933,0.00056877226,0.0062901177,0.00022466588,0.0000018128184,0.000006782914,0.00000394735,0.9916235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952304,0.000033434262,0.000097185846,0.000105905325,0.00017927775,0.0000611416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988544,0.00074631564,0.000057824334,0.00008453845,0.0002213826,0.00003552609],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062329,0.000057343525,0.00006728743,0.0000746936,0.0004495731,0.00015352362,0.000071093644,0.00031282817,0.0048890123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010384442,0.00005587707,0.000018824163,0.000035901525,0.00018542001,0.00014669764,0.000020375199,0.00073599746,0.0001053054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.447114e-7,0.0000017793942,0.0000021521637,0.0000053614303,0.000007588936,1.3706087e-7,0.005191546,5.868281e-9,6.900265e-8,0.8453819,0.14537543,0.004033661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011145663,0.000001822137,0.000004147397,0.000017028251,0.000012000128,8.510967e-8,0.00070767896,2.3444574e-7,2.817458e-7,0.23953617,0.7596595,0.000049911712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00134886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014731035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6142841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032400276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016704247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407613621","doi":"10.1186/s40468-025-00341-4","title":"Correction: Lessons from the Chinese imperial examination system","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Testing in Asia","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Imperial examination; Linguistics; Psychology; Language education; Mathematics education; History; Philosophy; Ancient history","score_opus":0.027878936346111008,"score_gpt":0.3862787152161436,"score_spread":0.3583997788700326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407613621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49971664,0.00011469738,0.00021460319,0.01642594,0.0045087207,0.00019172953,0.0000048214274,0.00018356425,0.4786393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950226,0.0000011415195,0.00044345084,0.00030253938,0.00065103825,0.000028390863,0.000012831402,0.000003710808,0.00353428],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914724,0.0003443221,0.00015025567,0.000117459684,0.00012983686,0.00011091203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974899,0.0021808099,0.00008131265,0.00013753481,0.000093649105,0.000016771435],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009194731,0.000053033913,0.00006303699,0.000057478337,0.00045534922,0.00019353829,0.00016071659,0.000052522504,0.000111508445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009805205,0.000041095125,0.000014323474,0.0014838338,0.00005170594,0.00020867106,0.000018982904,0.00023681113,0.00002629095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016631178,0.00017276763,0.21013856,0.000025064339,0.000029900488,0.000017670513,0.37735063,0.000075364944,0.0019954205,0.14688675,0.022332434,0.24095881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027941493,0.000007134662,0.81645614,0.00018429219,0.000017259179,0.0000022660402,0.16221395,0.0014715565,0.00005531991,0.00054647715,0.018641213,0.0001249638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04688612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014664221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6063176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016268087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407871582","doi":"10.1108/rcf-03-2024-0083","title":"Issuing Equity in the Face of Bad News","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Corporate Finance","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Equity (law); Business; Internet privacy; Advertising; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.13579858016225888,"score_gpt":0.47217795692280834,"score_spread":0.33637937676054946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407871582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027428217,0.12270364,0.0008440952,0.25579935,0.00065572065,0.0011529685,0.000011675419,0.000015649111,0.59138864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85452795,0.13778111,0.00047258925,0.0043527936,0.000025998514,0.000024452804,0.000003203835,0.0000018608346,0.0028100326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911743,0.00025406273,0.00032139407,0.00007159192,0.00015533275,0.000080165904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891275,0.00021674296,0.0005003869,0.00018075226,0.00018299247,0.0000063580933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019104517,0.00003857312,0.00015298453,0.00003527814,0.000070214155,0.000014647762,0.0002842717,0.000023714212,0.00006140987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014305401,0.000029322064,0.000032305878,0.0016573629,0.000102973594,0.0002061927,0.000021984515,0.00012408718,0.000009889039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026223092,0.00007834119,0.0026959176,0.0012914016,0.000003189812,3.7729424e-7,0.0029549964,0.000004210629,0.000031838877,0.87786007,0.027681677,0.08739538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040456893,0.00000637379,0.0072099487,0.0027516377,0.000008874916,1.07338956e-7,0.00081117504,0.0000030173792,0.00005201262,0.006247095,0.9828344,0.000034915716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012473146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049519533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9551527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024215251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008354326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18855749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407929348","doi":"10.5539/jel.v14n3p328","title":"The Structure and Implementation Strategies of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Courses in Legal Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Problem-based learning; Psychology; Teaching method; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.012579455731613728,"score_gpt":0.41428186003585094,"score_spread":0.4017024043042372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407929348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9547143,0.0011900455,0.00015203537,0.033094637,0.00071417243,0.0001584639,3.0702333e-7,0.000005677523,0.009970363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970221,0.00025626787,0.0009045384,0.00018014139,0.00011555514,0.000003877192,0.000003861312,0.0000030136664,0.001510623],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989543,0.00039706883,0.0003395022,0.0000656493,0.00015385453,0.00008960119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984896,0.00042752532,0.00051303935,0.000034962184,0.00049978326,0.000035091718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012485073,0.00005288573,0.00008631897,0.00025235233,0.0005973108,0.00033565782,0.000067132445,0.000041585656,0.000060225542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087489455,0.000043237353,0.000017259823,0.000449614,0.00010349667,0.0007269519,0.0000062525423,0.0005170165,1.660117e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004588718,0.00021061166,0.17484438,0.0000817672,0.000030223198,1.268825e-7,0.044961598,0.00084840076,0.0010530202,0.3871504,0.0025515936,0.388222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002294279,0.000060200255,0.08386894,0.00011277511,0.00002437266,0.0000030248075,0.44023132,0.00003411924,0.00010358478,0.0031734514,0.47210556,0.000053199496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017695444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014466089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46955398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006960611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067667337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407948847","doi":"10.21428/f1f23564.964ac1a5","title":"Right Managements of your Rights Management: Ethical Curation and the SpokenWeb UAlberta Collection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IDEAH","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.016548270295251886,"score_gpt":0.3794641094999642,"score_spread":0.36291583920471226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407948847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010213904,0.000044756205,0.00094445323,0.15263267,0.00065713463,0.0004056912,9.795237e-7,0.000023063792,0.83507735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9352025,0.0000965393,0.0002504043,0.0017714016,0.000052324904,0.000030187532,0.0000037905284,0.000001924558,0.06259093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991684,0.00025287634,0.00018449107,0.00010989004,0.00019530924,0.000089050554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993347,0.00032003727,0.00009670986,0.000116322284,0.00011358073,0.000018681334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009667362,0.00004662297,0.000071889524,0.0001225982,0.00077060837,0.00012457623,0.00011471204,0.000075633245,0.0003081215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028163244,0.000034201712,0.000022535123,0.0008113544,0.00022951113,0.00030757836,0.000029707651,0.000203188,0.000019927129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028641409,0.00002588644,0.0002549196,0.000011946614,0.000037453523,2.6612236e-7,0.0038877197,0.0000014107403,0.0000023008367,0.9716653,0.023025455,0.001058699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005892157,0.0000049969644,0.004875112,0.00002110837,0.000061417886,1.299028e-7,0.0030551418,0.00009604129,0.000032764015,0.15087312,0.84034187,0.00004911329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007176995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005605453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92498857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040513092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076296164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408037702","doi":"10.1017/s1472669624000550","title":"Indigenous Legal Materials and Libraries: One Canadian Law Library's Experience","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law library; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02032287219458814,"score_gpt":0.29486302554967975,"score_spread":0.27454015335509163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408037702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010227707,0.00010767276,0.0003272888,0.04491947,0.0013253579,0.00053249387,0.00004418368,0.00030031608,0.9422155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691869,0.00019153144,0.0018861365,0.01229242,0.00023377783,0.00010455637,0.00015092836,0.000009943568,0.015943788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989776,0.000056268404,0.00030114446,0.00011503555,0.0002688148,0.00028112848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995493,0.000040538835,0.000059754737,0.00013459232,0.00003763323,0.00017815344],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030478736,0.00009258747,0.000077922276,0.00031670232,0.0007945942,0.007326827,0.00019334236,0.00006342133,0.0022864128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030342999,0.00009829068,0.000016558603,0.00062470464,0.00014284502,0.024476059,0.000054857144,0.0001440783,0.00052560156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033967535,0.000007760894,0.000014275486,0.00005473675,0.000019915831,0.0000048792544,0.046001773,0.0000023127143,0.000002610668,0.92983145,0.016703956,0.007352913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005362201,0.000010005023,0.0002712201,0.00002827155,0.000010543384,0.0000017074409,0.011120803,0.000013269337,0.00011141832,0.0021991602,0.986056,0.00012392957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28099397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02360747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96935207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010460679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006150381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408099999","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.185","title":"How Should Professional Resistance Be Integrated Into Conceptions of Professional Accountability?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The AMA Journal of Ethic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"South Health Campus","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Resistance (ecology); Professional development; Professional studies; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.10354525269059169,"score_gpt":0.477410464537555,"score_spread":0.3738652118469633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408099999","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16634077,0.00033717774,0.00049032056,0.820001,0.0026318925,0.00020397663,0.0000072595108,0.000010668547,0.00997693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624492,0.000064990294,0.00078386004,0.0037944517,0.00020860987,0.000009436427,0.0000025111847,0.0000038835224,0.03268309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976306,0.0010683202,0.00045066857,0.00008631192,0.0006296927,0.00013442423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949379,0.0020476694,0.0006349551,0.00017936248,0.0021496476,0.00005049844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004671915,0.00007589209,0.00016720893,0.00014318348,0.0008117286,0.0001154356,0.00049994607,0.00015464489,0.0004245172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007001078,0.000046887857,0.000084489584,0.0010863261,0.0008383209,0.0007773863,0.000040000865,0.0015671991,0.0000026446926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019714046,0.00040226855,0.0031747886,0.000055270542,0.00007791079,8.750085e-7,0.08190913,0.000006634377,0.0037103875,0.7890362,0.1196494,0.0017799571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032245784,0.00002716874,0.008508655,0.00042325867,0.000053386793,0.000001637741,0.122868255,0.000004575695,0.00048593897,0.08951425,0.77770853,0.00008189959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036043974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002392209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8162066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014778858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057900473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408163024","doi":"10.4324/9781003458821-13","title":"When ‘Legally Good Enough’ Is Not Enough","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.05827610065519335,"score_gpt":0.36383452444190967,"score_spread":0.3055584237867163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408163024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[3.99351e-7,0.00008487852,0.00008247885,0.2513481,0.0012362881,0.00026538476,0.00004794804,0.00012882518,0.74680567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011324001,0.00030658007,0.002060353,0.027220972,0.00097564294,0.000016965449,0.000051125306,0.000023513012,0.9682124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824363,0.000052505176,0.00040784894,0.00039421866,0.0006174459,0.0002843629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982061,0.00043851303,0.00026519794,0.00041104486,0.00055895786,0.00012018739],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057206507,0.00023635334,0.00025816454,0.00021627407,0.00069647294,0.0004753285,0.00049078773,0.00051216985,0.063006245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041594662,0.00024113354,0.0001466781,0.00013460252,0.00018561889,0.00060536305,0.00007158846,0.0008468727,0.002559868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031324464,0.000018196952,0.0000014436725,0.0000074527507,0.00004156877,0.0000010325073,0.007848375,3.097569e-8,0.0000011289549,0.63144517,0.35437417,0.0062583247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007999408,0.000013805812,0.000004108143,0.000038358932,0.000059630238,4.890333e-7,0.00086106604,6.0417057e-7,0.000017439563,0.043729525,0.95492727,0.0002677063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008773557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042811306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6005531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022146167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041448986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99821675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408868102","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340112","title":"Forensic DNA Expert Evidence in the South African Context","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); International law; Forensic science; Political science; Law; Biology; Genetics; Paleontology","score_opus":0.15831049403218284,"score_gpt":0.4367864050471854,"score_spread":0.2784759110150026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408868102","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14665726,0.016054682,0.00012248036,0.7348706,0.0019847015,0.00027453923,0.00000184506,0.000016196429,0.100017704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99360704,0.0005474747,0.000153067,0.0040480257,0.00032106828,0.000012320458,6.6141055e-8,0.0000029414987,0.0013080155],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983362,0.0005052506,0.00043430305,0.00009691955,0.00042084247,0.00020647583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969044,0.0019152113,0.00035397508,0.00012162844,0.00066491903,0.00003986544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024997927,0.00008566166,0.000219029,0.00019839301,0.00054087554,0.00018766818,0.00042493956,0.000028090055,0.000033895223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007524493,0.000055329372,0.00008067389,0.0013867833,0.00047274565,0.000807403,0.00003326107,0.00041031884,0.00000620376],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080364516,0.000114153925,0.004782213,0.000008316908,0.00015985155,0.00002409082,0.6819342,0.0000034465434,0.000028305203,0.20691194,0.086904354,0.01904881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011199418,0.00004731566,0.0025322707,0.000096645905,0.000020397685,0.000003940012,0.54418707,4.1655827e-7,0.000016307486,0.0016215546,0.451314,0.000048095473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019489438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038033484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84694976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019130408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095923716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9008065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408999913","doi":"10.7202/1117014ar","title":"Melvin Eisenberg, 'Legal Reasoning'","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04459649605821138,"score_gpt":0.4383971400522156,"score_spread":0.3938006439940042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408999913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008785866,0.02815465,0.000010327127,0.3369827,0.00042196835,0.00025403424,0.0000012570771,0.000032937824,0.63405424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7144008,0.16311336,0.0016639945,0.09879931,0.0009562199,0.0003455219,0.000025777988,0.00001866009,0.020676326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890625,0.00029433877,0.00029456505,0.00016263808,0.0001801476,0.00016202958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993027,0.00021612398,0.000092654394,0.00020878852,0.00013390183,0.000045850866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011886987,0.000072483555,0.00017049833,0.00011201339,0.0002138983,0.000075789285,0.00022527995,0.00004648692,0.0008200247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030011814,0.00007178701,0.000055564986,0.0016457669,0.00008528678,0.00044333257,0.000022145552,0.00028438467,0.00021833238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013214762,0.000052227566,0.0006264087,0.00022092012,0.0000054920642,0.0000012812897,0.00028001616,1.7824705e-7,8.744504e-7,0.95387495,0.03824259,0.006693715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006215415,0.0000030448443,0.00043300475,0.0015786154,0.00001713765,3.6627222e-7,0.000071587136,0.0000012845665,0.0000016743769,0.032889962,0.96487087,0.000070291695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014687933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048390005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9266283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011029706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007738702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8978696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409006083","doi":"10.59962/9780774870672","title":"After Redress","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020653340701530746,"score_gpt":0.2544376523225743,"score_spread":0.23378431162104357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409006083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011717536,0.00018495828,0.000019889332,0.00027853917,0.00052231865,0.000339416,0.00045909712,0.00007099284,0.9980076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014101166,0.00020753613,0.00022707992,0.00017666575,0.00013412749,0.0000014415449,0.000037805814,0.000009238635,0.997796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891233,0.00013990428,0.00015875863,0.00026199667,0.00034269976,0.00018430492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872756,0.00015789169,0.00023390938,0.00024336255,0.00055114075,0.00008614737],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024900454,0.00006790191,0.00022106609,0.000059891958,0.0004280747,0.00034289144,0.00044969053,0.0003561669,0.001798713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010222416,0.000190805,0.000115751085,0.000039102433,0.00058183534,0.00021390854,0.0001248863,0.00046742673,0.000010791029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011199481,0.00002984146,0.000025278341,0.00007181534,0.00006151668,0.000049598235,0.0029879247,1.2370296e-7,1.6166784e-7,0.008059041,0.96974564,0.01895784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017539659,0.000008653755,0.00026845254,0.00036446538,0.000100700796,0.0000014000253,0.0007309763,4.3979128e-7,1.6472639e-7,0.0018072422,0.9963729,0.00016919976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66142744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7555923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094164856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021663813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033647898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409328116","doi":"10.36834/cmej.81283","title":"Royal College exams, examined","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Medical Education Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0234947573221635,"score_gpt":0.3513419708500286,"score_spread":0.3278472135278651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409328116","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011576768,0.00018685768,0.000008130288,0.6319685,0.0121519,0.00015623817,0.000033102624,0.000020531657,0.35546315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00035728636,0.0001269379,0.00013234268,0.6933584,0.023017526,0.000033437438,0.00015777147,0.000016471791,0.2827998],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604577,0.00085199194,0.00059723895,0.00028604406,0.0015035945,0.0007153878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99242216,0.0005618518,0.0003305834,0.00028868698,0.0012046813,0.005192037],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021841777,0.00021379176,0.0002587545,0.0010039379,0.001770581,0.00062875403,0.00094023754,0.0015241455,0.21269874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06515021,0.00022760568,0.000112963084,0.0010376702,0.00034408123,0.0003283832,0.000015402738,0.008003494,0.00038868093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001154711,0.000033850247,0.000016770282,0.000016230528,0.00003297068,0.00010307649,0.0017073862,9.96428e-8,1.2006256e-8,0.011263371,0.9706249,0.016200129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115066156,0.000009107744,0.000068272224,0.00017600955,0.000042160125,0.00006837996,0.0033615455,0.0000032350567,1.1218079e-7,0.001111734,0.99481565,0.0002287175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2381632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24760896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58404136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020165143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5860579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409374391","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-15888-9.00008-x","title":"Ethics: what are the impacts of what’s been learned?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.07165557521735409,"score_gpt":0.38636332067843215,"score_spread":0.31470774546107805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409374391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010028664,0.004384925,7.670193e-7,0.09962486,0.0022413332,0.00044665256,0.00001106353,0.000036040117,0.8932443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020843917,0.009666043,0.000044310473,0.008624164,0.0005717746,0.000022579312,0.000013647619,0.000023447405,0.97894967],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980915,0.00028420935,0.00044421677,0.0002670872,0.0006693531,0.00024362531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964385,0.0014659541,0.00070935657,0.0005302807,0.00076227094,0.00009361308],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022613164,0.0002113508,0.00031250584,0.0001659438,0.00077056716,0.001049754,0.0005686029,0.0005809089,0.00090253615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014684949,0.00016726047,0.00018246738,0.00007978195,0.00061834685,0.0010235518,0.000092360184,0.0020904802,0.00014514744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045846164,0.0000072827884,0.0000057569387,0.000046904308,0.00006600463,9.962981e-7,0.025550783,1.156166e-7,0.0000010278544,0.26981723,0.0024608048,0.7020385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057407655,0.000011374228,0.00001876747,0.0011779536,0.00009044922,5.9115894e-7,0.018886501,1.6311795e-7,0.000008178224,0.038916774,0.94067115,0.00016068884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014641779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035683352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93821037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013473624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036111372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409483009","doi":"10.53555/sfs.v10i1.3540","title":"A Study Of Advt To Know Effect Of Emotional Appeal.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Appeal to emotion; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.25322991681820756,"score_gpt":0.4282699626880181,"score_spread":0.17504004586981053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409483009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873314,0.000016751528,0.0000050960753,0.0062894626,0.00082855247,0.000155144,0.000005430601,0.0000052859996,0.005362866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994044,0.000027599355,0.000108868044,0.00004058016,0.000068876674,0.0000031173895,6.30488e-7,0.0000022994693,0.0003436583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972082,0.0011941658,0.00053022656,0.00009399195,0.0008199444,0.00015347033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968304,0.0020692481,0.00046026323,0.00006975351,0.00050661573,0.00006373855],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015236888,0.00005576746,0.00021866192,0.00049031054,0.00020569951,0.000076250195,0.00040468434,0.00003132376,0.00016165552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008533798,0.000043539167,0.000037428832,0.004613975,0.00035882607,0.0008077505,0.000035379027,0.00015990152,0.00000675386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047714402,0.00016435047,0.96658766,0.000007616434,0.000008585483,0.0000018638282,0.022994192,0.0001651785,0.00006226672,0.00028631723,0.008473682,0.0012005529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023615404,0.0011677026,0.9633702,0.000042384254,0.0000048150678,0.0000011929139,0.027037196,0.0000022082882,0.000074463445,0.00013559272,0.007876508,0.000051590512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064682467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013116716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012072959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040249182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084209506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409603222","doi":"10.22329/jtl.v19i1.9396","title":"Teaching Humanities &amp; Social Science: Teaching &amp; Learning Across Australia 8th Edition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Sociology; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.08170930984417654,"score_gpt":0.46454940745156603,"score_spread":0.38284009760738946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409603222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8643076,0.00008193754,0.003991473,0.013749391,0.0018116365,0.00007598568,9.5081396e-7,0.0000926304,0.11588843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9349364,0.0000143474035,0.0034117457,0.00043874088,0.0022178488,0.0000020447637,0.000004940071,0.000011982966,0.058961928],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954306,0.0025485067,0.0005738899,0.00022367273,0.0007372141,0.00048612175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976928,0.0009568433,0.0007967918,0.0000827434,0.0003615956,0.000109223045],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024327638,0.0001592184,0.0002597003,0.00052582513,0.020046687,0.0018301212,0.00035153193,0.00013279283,0.00010476229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016574591,0.00015632572,0.0001088198,0.00035006573,0.0005144632,0.0026496435,0.00009001409,0.009077333,0.000014015615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044509823,0.00018236988,0.024726566,0.00006129847,0.0000910097,0.0000034313603,0.6509803,0.0003314765,0.0031328027,0.21452428,0.011751608,0.09417035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002376511,0.00003718158,0.0064536417,0.00015752813,0.000040274226,0.000016357699,0.1158195,0.000019937397,0.0000058822,0.0009821967,0.8760705,0.00015933553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051673166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041086785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8643189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003435004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064373435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409644678","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5213866","title":"Thinking Like a Practicing Lawyer as a Legal Research Methodology&amp;nbsp;","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Legal ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Medical education; Engineering","score_opus":0.1991904193241279,"score_gpt":0.551081312368497,"score_spread":0.3518908930443691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409644678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038453016,0.001772849,0.021868976,0.42351776,0.0021542306,0.0003202602,4.940047e-7,0.000097087046,0.5118153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8200554,0.0026348908,0.004915557,0.005693539,0.0011357211,0.00002441651,0.0000026790915,0.000019214518,0.16551854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99286056,0.0034677705,0.00035140634,0.0002373129,0.00083935255,0.0022436301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565697,0.0029045143,0.0002162318,0.00021033228,0.0009120424,0.00009989722],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04491277,0.00010367816,0.00015888654,0.0005435936,0.0034066585,0.0008954521,0.00058799464,0.00016462921,0.00041197985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014506944,0.000099373705,0.00008208019,0.0019677195,0.00023316694,0.00142315,0.00007431608,0.008217005,0.00023322145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044620057,0.000073320974,0.0003424136,0.0000026465768,0.00010166145,0.00000219026,0.011857768,0.000002692634,0.00021689368,0.9720693,0.0064005926,0.008885883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012656914,0.00003241562,0.00005320081,0.000016314658,0.000019458455,0.000059136386,0.042965423,0.0000012504207,0.000019632911,0.41966727,0.53697914,0.000060192437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022771303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062053163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78160244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00192044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040285923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409650394","doi":"10.63485/yftaw-k7j03","title":"Wiki on world law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.11757164828808832,"score_gpt":0.46788867214851554,"score_spread":0.35031702386042723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409650394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047118557,0.0000140665,0.000025149226,0.24319023,0.0014915732,0.00013353457,0.0000033099477,0.00010881217,0.75456214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5517986,0.000032878605,0.0016549845,0.025047677,0.0020028362,0.00003254125,0.000020935857,0.000008310902,0.41940123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990897,0.00011790812,0.00015750197,0.00019337505,0.0002900632,0.00015145131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992088,0.00022161721,0.00010885943,0.0002470097,0.00013993868,0.00007375297],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005183269,0.000083878454,0.00008540452,0.00010833896,0.00038906856,0.0004418355,0.00025290783,0.00012621279,0.013518232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023858115,0.00008093917,0.000047773483,0.00028702212,0.00012050787,0.00024587743,0.000063293,0.00082708185,0.0015567674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001556129,0.000057628895,0.000020609561,0.0000018532767,0.0000062846225,1.7828948e-7,0.002912546,0.00001901294,4.0775777e-7,0.847584,0.14457698,0.00481894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026114973,0.0000025106024,0.00010984237,0.000012876891,0.0000060069706,3.9844952e-8,0.00068560126,0.0000034494406,0.000014730206,0.016813535,0.9822208,0.00010449242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04666693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1615935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8376438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016254238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095323287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409657810","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/6zs5g_v1","title":"Mindfulness and Legal Practice: A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Mindfulness Meditation and Stress Reduction in Lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mindfulness; Meditation; Mindfulness meditation; Stress reduction; Mindfulness-based stress reduction; Psychology; Psychotherapist; Stress (linguistics); Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.02430525871158278,"score_gpt":0.3796549004947345,"score_spread":0.3553496417831517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409657810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97686845,0.00008327644,0.00004921102,0.011574797,0.0025495545,0.0019179429,0.000008292217,0.000009388352,0.0069391103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998369,0.0000041526678,0.00008597696,0.000022902137,0.0001372197,0.00032147756,0.0000060387665,0.0000080824175,0.0010451976],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976541,0.0010480068,0.00038563178,0.00029903356,0.00048884697,0.00012438459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996747,0.001298911,0.0010543589,0.0003804798,0.00047421778,0.0000449977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001610056,0.00013285645,0.00024317153,0.00017819314,0.00038966953,0.00017753002,0.00028842618,0.00021824971,0.000016498087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007256045,0.00010895092,0.000026391735,0.00025084236,0.00044625744,0.0010337069,0.00023794804,0.0006028056,2.515168e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019946864,0.0095552495,0.016906518,0.003930583,0.00053946004,0.000022168711,0.5893791,0.00019603384,0.00009201129,0.18533091,0.0031804962,0.18887278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004827793,0.0008361644,0.12052582,0.0016443647,0.0008470922,0.000021129948,0.82316583,0.00009051075,0.03001669,0.012850441,0.0044681258,0.0007060092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037184324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007240438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23378678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060661292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008864308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96922714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409674543","doi":"10.3138/cjwl-04-x","title":"The Murky Circumstances of Consent in Canada: A Commentary on <i>R. v Kirkpatrick</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027221916312663245,"score_gpt":0.29954327072214665,"score_spread":0.2723213544094834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409674543","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34234127,0.0011287924,0.000003747,0.5870178,0.00092655467,0.00015511189,0.000017638555,0.0000011419061,0.06840799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740582,0.0003490651,0.0000063201524,0.024412418,0.000078032084,0.0000059048853,6.0332684e-7,0.000002638298,0.0010867885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892604,0.00032329813,0.0003255125,0.000057218887,0.00012372977,0.00024422375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976715,0.0016890812,0.0002374538,0.00010344327,0.00012274005,0.00017582178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019826232,0.00005647581,0.00016198457,0.0001012167,0.0004670091,0.000103779086,0.00026551553,0.000023667559,0.000044034452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005817044,0.000039342278,0.000030193096,0.00042807564,0.00040592026,0.00012952404,0.000007362771,0.00032659783,4.4224507e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054535576,0.000012572579,0.0069059157,0.000011231031,0.0000475199,0.0000141681785,0.027535902,0.00001669589,7.440545e-7,0.9259782,0.037709873,0.0017126815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072550285,0.000024996782,0.0030280924,0.00009363152,0.0000134245065,0.0000071706318,0.07365562,0.000005567039,0.000006557651,0.05301884,0.8693585,0.00006210802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9728402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99906206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8729593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011930827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012443061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409910909","doi":"10.1017/cls.2024.20","title":"Reducing the “Justice Gap” Through Data for Systemic Change: Using Multiple-Perspective Legal-Needs Surveys to Improve Person-Centered Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1725078629693141,"score_gpt":0.39133556413300946,"score_spread":0.21882770116369535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409910909","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28302792,0.017258663,0.02383076,0.57914394,0.030986562,0.0046371,0.004117617,0.00010316921,0.056894246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986712,0.00027727868,0.0013770609,0.007649699,0.0026069551,0.000019117513,0.000025554153,0.000037487353,0.0012948421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982085,0.00032829097,0.00038505564,0.00031952382,0.00014168129,0.00061694265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618286,0.0015234778,0.00025479944,0.00033353886,0.000977564,0.00072777394],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045889597,0.0001746193,0.00027738602,0.000098596654,0.002033056,0.0008925858,0.0005731495,0.00015833772,0.00005437396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026757028,0.00016685681,0.00016832432,0.00062921713,0.00033677559,0.0018479885,0.000024326315,0.0006813075,0.0000021797762],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004997078,0.000007668717,0.000008997775,0.00020745349,0.00015656913,0.00001915126,0.3750643,0.000028899314,0.00007654112,0.61616105,0.0073459037,0.00091845135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028290198,0.000057670124,0.000023349468,0.00040237978,0.00076019194,0.00024978124,0.6866328,0.0023493127,0.000003389974,0.0010066001,0.30797616,0.00025546714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5869983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.667736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7036841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019738262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047475668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409996467","doi":"10.70564/jcals.v1i2.42","title":"TWIRL IN RECOGNITION OF THE RIGHT TO ACCESS LEGAL INFORMATION REGIME IN TANZANIA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Contemporary African Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Computer science; Business; Geography; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.10154376960033157,"score_gpt":0.39491228891895763,"score_spread":0.29336851931862606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409996467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6003859,0.00027927343,0.000015612144,0.24006546,0.0015857046,0.0004556503,0.00001535361,0.000020057649,0.157177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798936,0.000105224324,0.00004886455,0.0008484035,0.00015459578,0.0000136202225,0.0000016392737,0.0000037722486,0.0008345534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810463,0.00037050826,0.00082580774,0.00006662665,0.00047598014,0.00015641667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979342,0.00044367832,0.00078499364,0.00009312579,0.00069274096,0.000051210794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024029575,0.00008008172,0.0002554213,0.0006257928,0.00019035902,0.000162678,0.0003593953,0.00004414245,0.000030153435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034647097,0.000058350888,0.000066795976,0.003404179,0.0001422255,0.005615612,0.00007408908,0.0003736022,0.000018082983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008719186,0.0005261902,0.071106404,0.00012750276,0.00029579306,0.00008140555,0.33731547,0.0003438672,0.00026342963,0.061601486,0.5113825,0.016084023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004847992,0.00008368585,0.060647093,0.00020411184,0.000010082031,0.0000041141025,0.06365315,0.0000053853746,0.00016668063,0.0025573745,0.87207323,0.00011028976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00409543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043170196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39760342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019557016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011686877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6191093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410027655","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9559","title":"“Weaponizing” The Tort of Family Violence? Myths, Stereotypes, Lawyers’ Ethics and Access to Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Economic Justice; Mythology; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.14281429637353224,"score_gpt":0.4633369186579882,"score_spread":0.32052262228445594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410027655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33478245,0.00091783394,0.002791517,0.2240729,0.0041818167,0.002072386,0.000069632086,0.00011557388,0.43099588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761518,0.0003578446,0.0010962245,0.019435331,0.00032687603,0.00004363784,0.0000028784325,0.000014197594,0.0025711681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981017,0.0003503475,0.0004368658,0.0002928127,0.00054325064,0.00027500582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962993,0.002083444,0.00024260572,0.000392255,0.0008439421,0.00013843647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019336403,0.0001373487,0.0002239903,0.00024943898,0.00064958364,0.0004925571,0.0012130067,0.00016231579,0.00012879579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062827435,0.00012022432,0.000040310006,0.0015221554,0.0002902856,0.0010684773,0.0003709157,0.00064336945,0.00002566804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064762094,0.00070176966,0.011680151,0.0022731223,0.00034901363,0.000006582204,0.19023623,0.0005841546,0.0030629202,0.5798156,0.1561279,0.0545149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004627945,0.000117404416,0.10184762,0.0010396608,0.0011444823,0.0000010141263,0.07741053,0.00004365209,0.0016614831,0.0021953452,0.81362426,0.00045173158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006772214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014395778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6574964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006976575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015824565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410027815","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9560","title":"Reflections on the TRC’s Mandate to Law Schools: Microscopic and Macroscopic Changes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Political science; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11036744324900545,"score_gpt":0.4835372393179259,"score_spread":0.3731697960689205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410027815","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09980158,0.00006215814,0.00019691905,0.45736188,0.0011329515,0.00074123876,0.000018026127,0.000052829153,0.4406324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94079304,0.00005280943,0.0007419518,0.04107833,0.0002728727,0.000108216715,0.0000017729319,0.000009212005,0.01694177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991538,0.000121217876,0.00015568014,0.0001965168,0.00018158459,0.00019118495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990556,0.00036836643,0.00006772986,0.00023296979,0.00018746885,0.000087858185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046877607,0.00008222984,0.000105997206,0.00017402008,0.0007497512,0.0005232958,0.00037890224,0.00005721728,0.00026066953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009954746,0.00006910739,0.000016076445,0.00092035095,0.00009783299,0.0003420119,0.00009654553,0.00024125048,0.00009795531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054074873,0.00009439294,0.00050603156,0.00007351032,0.00003596739,5.400373e-7,0.010552217,0.000013705696,0.0041440423,0.9216048,0.061324287,0.0015964083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013127823,0.000059592243,0.00632032,0.00015193975,0.00008142459,1.9342106e-7,0.0065365373,0.0000014834364,0.0042146076,0.001600958,0.9807974,0.000104258295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046664164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008335405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9200039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006253196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030654564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7054257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410027959","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9182","title":"Reducing The “Justice Gap” Through Access to Unbundled Legal Services: Utilizing an A2J Measurement Framework to Measure Unbundling Effectiveness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Unbundling; Measure (data warehouse); Economic Justice; Business; Computer science; Telecommunications; Environmental economics; Political science; Database; Industrial organization; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.1968630646339921,"score_gpt":0.44799136096002223,"score_spread":0.2511282963260301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410027959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4705974,0.0016247296,0.08697764,0.17147864,0.019577242,0.008774141,0.00008400656,0.0010489912,0.23983723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98515207,0.000025161122,0.0037252242,0.008366484,0.0021425004,0.00025253653,0.00000504046,0.00007007028,0.0002609368],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995107,0.0009210911,0.000652189,0.0008466867,0.0017574405,0.0007156223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99482816,0.0021830709,0.00020843421,0.0007924332,0.0015517432,0.00043613266],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005173961,0.0003431403,0.00038833736,0.00038291092,0.0013689667,0.0040955963,0.0022709458,0.00022363916,0.00042057628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057491665,0.00030209863,0.00011056582,0.0040598838,0.00012286138,0.0050046793,0.00041936402,0.00097053766,0.000238121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015126548,0.0013555739,0.0015266426,0.008462556,0.00092663744,0.000046414414,0.44109622,0.052153148,0.014722046,0.43743464,0.014511866,0.02625161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007541734,0.0006123664,0.01656016,0.012890581,0.004730687,0.000014979765,0.13815096,0.0013224082,0.010139586,0.00637923,0.80604845,0.0023963954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016681654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003833685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7915366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059482094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020598057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410112869","doi":"10.53300/001c.137770","title":"Dear (Legal) Ed: One Indigenous Scholar’s Reflections on 30 years of Interactions with Legal Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Project commissioning; Legal education; Law; Publishing; Political science; Sociology; Management; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Economics","score_opus":0.0445505031404617,"score_gpt":0.4554306594851408,"score_spread":0.41088015634467906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410112869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03364197,0.015411322,0.00028310678,0.14173423,0.0064020623,0.00266852,0.000020976562,0.00021132555,0.79962647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77621585,0.026731592,0.008878715,0.050568227,0.0015246135,0.0015688603,0.00028061826,0.000071524075,0.13416001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976407,0.00052434165,0.0006635357,0.0003877378,0.0004930735,0.0002905945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971968,0.00027368683,0.0005199653,0.00057761127,0.0012734912,0.00015848092],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010555483,0.00018755771,0.0003244815,0.00053299405,0.0009664454,0.00039191483,0.00037018835,0.0001045883,0.0018159809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022280077,0.00020162594,0.0001143304,0.002848196,0.00017026352,0.0019035402,0.000024552533,0.0010091248,0.00041361904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025575348,0.0029204981,0.0002561872,0.00056058937,0.00011635219,4.788805e-7,0.0046194796,0.000006103883,0.000117456744,0.7034893,0.10404589,0.18384211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000999922,0.000061532184,0.0027538794,0.002310719,0.00017227532,0.0000071332965,0.004076997,3.6627307e-7,0.00007180215,0.00041186906,0.98984325,0.0001901563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019474884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030200165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8857974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059938536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020853702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410360042","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v8i1.81066","title":"Infusing Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) into Academic Integrity Practices in Canadian Higher Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Academic integrity; Higher education; Business; Accounting; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Social science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.09393125411731412,"score_gpt":0.4568473308585299,"score_spread":0.3629160767412158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410360042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42393437,0.0014864213,0.0000031748712,0.31743675,0.001503268,0.00045405168,0.000022162214,0.000046065463,0.25511375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98109084,0.00089144043,0.00013080289,0.013333003,0.0004393916,0.000026188449,0.000018235365,0.000011011089,0.004059069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970292,0.00069035665,0.0003758828,0.0005999288,0.00050748733,0.00079712993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970426,0.0005155845,0.00030855945,0.0002448412,0.00074977975,0.0011386505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050058668,0.00022968341,0.00023875221,0.0017979918,0.006799526,0.00015463801,0.00083501433,0.0010375099,0.00037148222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012746141,0.00025990402,0.0000422673,0.0021400864,0.00055128423,0.0018086854,0.0016093259,0.008740956,0.0000286105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002571911,0.00004736426,0.10667931,0.000017476656,0.000015768803,0.0000030743809,0.18669373,0.0000011341388,0.000020641193,0.6817575,0.017625842,0.0071124164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025618594,0.000024990626,0.08438462,0.00025843852,0.00003380913,0.0000024585547,0.14532107,0.000035757887,0.000009790562,0.12867999,0.640637,0.00035592436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99715424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6230111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014876588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04171982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410362094","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5210174","title":"Abstract for Michele M. Leering's (2023) Integrative Reflective Practice in Canada and Australia: Enhancing Legal Education, Pedagogy, and Professionalism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Pedagogy; Political science; Medical education; Sociology; Nursing; Medicine","score_opus":0.02204004538891354,"score_gpt":0.4384404856262001,"score_spread":0.41640044023728656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410362094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69024426,0.006471789,0.0011881668,0.27112994,0.002384681,0.0009807174,0.0000102346685,0.000019450777,0.027570756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98199296,0.0010499498,0.00042001347,0.00092618086,0.00016315252,0.000049734408,0.000004295803,0.0000059099943,0.015387782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984783,0.00017188679,0.00028429963,0.00017906618,0.00016785054,0.00071858667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982792,0.00085775985,0.00021677506,0.00005748683,0.0005295439,0.00005921828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002239361,0.00010152161,0.00012361794,0.00015520469,0.0006229946,0.00017137668,0.00010790092,0.00006819485,0.000032124914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034394087,0.000095799434,0.000017698238,0.00042902166,0.00006707519,0.0011009581,0.000015310354,0.0018373631,8.1979846e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008432117,0.000106658845,0.0015434235,0.000017156333,0.00009010666,9.2261917e-7,0.011109529,0.0000028381123,0.00032399292,0.95734,0.0038669102,0.025514144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004576182,0.00004991568,0.010309064,0.00013094967,0.00004883956,0.000048513084,0.45013076,0.0000039587158,0.00015600552,0.13265352,0.40580958,0.00020126061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93307906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82468647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002811724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.120927185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8840563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410411999","doi":"10.5430/wjel.v15n7p156","title":"Paving the Way for Legal Academic Writing in Higher Education Institutions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of English Language","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Higher education; Mathematics education; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04844035924415306,"score_gpt":0.41147689880902966,"score_spread":0.3630365395648766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410411999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12237947,0.0025871138,0.00015291784,0.14867535,0.010374475,0.00034942207,0.0000041844605,0.00002869159,0.7154484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97013867,0.00003647825,0.00047797465,0.0025348961,0.0023815583,0.000016457467,0.0000022661438,0.0000034521097,0.024408242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918824,0.00012535515,0.00034908106,0.000059567534,0.0001426365,0.00013509367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852914,0.00062194257,0.00021568351,0.00007482647,0.0005243637,0.00003401991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016555971,0.000046837704,0.00008018655,0.0003222998,0.00037664664,0.00015830027,0.00023363151,0.000044396893,0.00020849686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004704257,0.000037314843,0.00005069535,0.0010968117,0.0000727775,0.0008552632,0.000012871114,0.00064032665,0.0000015158486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009249234,0.00006452579,0.0019317997,0.000008534157,0.0000111879035,7.749187e-7,0.03370395,0.000027504248,0.00008079962,0.9242118,0.026429828,0.013520069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001561696,0.00000354182,0.0035220876,0.00010858944,0.000016810869,4.4458568e-7,0.05453113,0.0000013954293,0.000027334929,0.000970398,0.94062185,0.000040248084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005724495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002359924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9232414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018401621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001822121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5631775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410638566","doi":"10.1163/19585705-12341511","title":"Is There a ‘Jury’ in Islamic Law? The Twelve-Witness Lafīfiyya Testimony and the Limits of Judicial Discretion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Islamica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Jury; Witness; Law; Discretion; Islam; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.029822195043995046,"score_gpt":0.37097915021650746,"score_spread":0.34115695517251243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410638566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21084058,0.00054716447,0.00010061792,0.32955232,0.00053472177,0.0006687985,0.000013506536,0.000025574145,0.4577167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951741,0.00031307538,0.000037566533,0.0023549912,0.00009566372,0.0000654155,0.0000018205825,0.0000048876595,0.0019524638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988078,0.00040099132,0.00025060863,0.00015895952,0.00021360301,0.0001680528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982351,0.0012741789,0.00013308556,0.00020240567,0.0001471477,0.000008049898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001166299,0.000085476786,0.00015553478,0.000062544095,0.0006427639,0.00009787076,0.00026685174,0.00006480283,0.00009672876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008455895,0.000051549516,0.00004104497,0.0010353787,0.0012146604,0.00021050234,0.000044437948,0.0003064113,0.0000104177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028670975,0.00005465631,0.0022026452,0.000006288757,0.00002582522,1.8904588e-7,0.035270147,0.0000013719082,0.000025562878,0.9585744,0.002018873,0.0017913267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018068452,0.00003358434,0.13014248,0.00013400643,0.0001435454,6.7976396e-7,0.049266875,0.00011101274,0.00017803333,0.7095203,0.10843464,0.00022804133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020292077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036851306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7843335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004414864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005501311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98623186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785188","doi":"10.1093/9780199289011.003.0063","title":"Practicalities Of Litigation1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.15677850217980657,"score_gpt":0.3921784893761554,"score_spread":0.23539998719634883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000024145077,0.000040966457,0.000081142636,0.017859109,0.0004027164,0.00011273155,0.00000984032,0.00003952898,0.9814516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007495428,0.00018134559,0.0008464221,0.000607935,0.00027049638,0.000004108597,0.000015518783,0.000010249218,0.9905685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992731,0.000034019948,0.00024797925,0.00009890363,0.0002611906,0.000084765095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860543,0.00037239486,0.00029637292,0.00015105128,0.00052053866,0.000054215983],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043353814,0.00007197146,0.00011255214,0.000093058436,0.00014818118,0.00004600474,0.00011670204,0.00018103974,0.05361969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000769806,0.000071164046,0.000050451355,0.00004155052,0.00034234227,0.00042274458,0.000013272198,0.00027156647,0.0005210571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016938496,0.000012077085,0.0000043869313,0.0000068398135,0.000017665492,2.5273354e-7,0.0062920717,6.7857746e-9,5.925322e-7,0.9613318,0.031085283,0.0012473757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001314343,0.0000060147163,0.000007108092,0.0000121583325,0.000016180496,2.9859945e-7,0.000835474,3.1880273e-8,0.000011574717,0.30316806,0.695872,0.00005795218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003723235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071208115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66478676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003814179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013628436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9472454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410918871","doi":"10.1177/14778785251340658","title":"Moral status, epistemic agency, and the education of students labeled with intellectual disability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Moral agency; Epistemology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Moral education; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.057167999361775815,"score_gpt":0.5030226405786556,"score_spread":0.44585464121687984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410918871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9399152,0.000789738,0.000012336389,0.02306438,0.00025137226,0.00058829854,0.0000011787301,0.0000060295315,0.035371475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938106,0.00084932876,0.000060380953,0.0001584436,0.000055480876,0.0001263299,0.0000061465544,0.0000025629968,0.004930708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996444,0.0027876568,0.00017888212,0.0001449033,0.00028029972,0.00016428881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959341,0.0034535408,0.000055065935,0.0001584829,0.0003479615,0.00005079138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00907281,0.0000476718,0.000084850566,0.00015840142,0.00046096763,0.00012000024,0.00015636419,0.00004298819,0.00008465644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040811524,0.00003210278,0.00000852761,0.0011105427,0.0020386828,0.00027880183,0.00004414368,0.0003378494,0.0000021077742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003550899,0.0004926482,0.048021615,0.00004038756,0.000009047021,1.290361e-8,0.0761951,3.2129128e-7,0.00001643845,0.83164614,0.0003933686,0.04282982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005123269,0.00004250868,0.118822336,0.00014687223,0.000014642171,5.634401e-7,0.25705495,0.0000041771723,0.00006475363,0.60733044,0.01594096,0.00006547754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068091387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010528713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22431573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014466803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003609205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411092741","doi":"10.1177/23220058251334748","title":"Student Perspectives of the Value of General Education in Professional Studies: Investigating a Law School in Bangladesh","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Sociology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Law; Political science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.024329567195071018,"score_gpt":0.44467951131055744,"score_spread":0.42034994411548643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411092741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8713123,0.0009292003,0.000004266195,0.07988286,0.0032884092,0.0003012646,7.7334875e-7,0.0000022312897,0.04427868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946267,0.00004368673,0.0012429107,0.0007529049,0.00029307048,0.000019609304,9.479818e-7,0.000004193552,0.0030159869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979786,0.00067180744,0.0007404177,0.00010420509,0.00038749052,0.00011743374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977433,0.000179442,0.00081734225,0.00012873064,0.0010782838,0.00005291435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016378361,0.000075455886,0.0001875145,0.000395028,0.00016471025,0.00004753559,0.00030146533,0.00006015662,0.000044619574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034736495,0.000061124454,0.00006367101,0.0014506261,0.00028218768,0.0009224687,0.000028760172,0.00051786454,7.043766e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001385896,0.0011123009,0.08688298,0.00004368396,0.000033725333,1.2064861e-7,0.18926017,0.000047516245,0.00049227284,0.7152199,0.0031654083,0.0037280647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023074633,0.000026728974,0.31725076,0.00083795685,0.000022618424,0.000002112636,0.6623504,0.0000032836626,0.00033904143,0.010535676,0.008344155,0.000056527424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041147675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002716562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7046842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058970903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022891741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98264754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411153133","doi":"10.5539/jel.v14n6p119","title":"Critical Perspectives on Ethical Challenges in Higher Education: Analysing Contemporary Practices and Future Considerations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Political science","score_opus":0.1664070591323326,"score_gpt":0.49573737836728055,"score_spread":0.32933031923494793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411153133","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045255255,0.015882539,0.0000056422637,0.7525392,0.0013792904,0.000062646184,1.3041625e-7,0.0000076107835,0.18486765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878829,0.003264145,0.0009667027,0.0037152823,0.0011912034,0.0000055579094,7.794992e-7,0.0000035206288,0.0029698866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835896,0.0009486026,0.0003028121,0.00013337207,0.0001724075,0.000083821564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682844,0.0018930511,0.0004042462,0.00005703301,0.0007318481,0.00008537806],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018594756,0.00006613787,0.00013422806,0.0004509788,0.0005877116,0.0003448891,0.000040678704,0.0001380446,0.00037535632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010077374,0.000062827356,0.000025336944,0.0003622629,0.00016217855,0.0008330413,0.0000079373585,0.0014407579,0.0000014275614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001607433,0.00035607998,0.0037719696,0.00002016674,0.000019673114,7.135128e-7,0.06353593,0.0000020847042,0.000018527513,0.9095444,0.004693281,0.018021086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009781549,0.000033249136,0.044525947,0.00010017418,0.00001977424,0.0000088472225,0.39955324,0.000002985528,0.0000015153687,0.005715512,0.5498894,0.00005153531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001796883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000077302975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94262767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008949048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042744107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411166513","doi":"10.31542/27qd3a63","title":"Teaching, Technology, and Time: Revisiting Ellen Rose’s Call for Reflection in an AI Era","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pedagogical Inquiry and Practice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Rose (mathematics); Deep time; Reflection (computer programming); History; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2513450595105244,"score_gpt":0.5580567274845407,"score_spread":0.30671166797401633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411166513","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09881336,0.0008482006,0.0028788296,0.7250877,0.00046631345,0.000650961,0.0000039976394,0.00017377452,0.17107685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542069,0.00053586526,0.009515707,0.014382602,0.0008534881,0.000112472255,0.000017768094,0.000011088275,0.02036415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853534,0.0006716485,0.00022945466,0.00027144403,0.00010160002,0.00019054253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717873,0.0023379845,0.00012148027,0.000107897475,0.00019173676,0.00006219257],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003485374,0.00008248,0.000120950994,0.00023816402,0.0009166744,0.00030981173,0.000092212416,0.0002005831,0.000065199216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0133513855,0.00008046826,0.000014269999,0.00059089204,0.00024487628,0.0019498413,0.000039380564,0.0007599639,0.0000071474574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019949948,0.00025312722,0.0014239273,0.000041908414,0.000015464542,0.0000024115368,0.03313072,0.0000022515308,0.00058140943,0.86637855,0.0041031684,0.09386759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022394035,0.00007782471,0.0005772786,0.000028568727,0.000030579253,0.000007701341,0.025037179,0.00014302728,0.000012923956,0.014061945,0.9596941,0.0001049233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087823963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020501208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95559096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000521221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026513913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411174973","doi":"10.17323/1999-5431-2015-0-1-7-32","title":"Ethics and responsibility in the public administration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Issues","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Public administration; Business; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.24286063217806558,"score_gpt":0.4911773963812261,"score_spread":0.2483167642031605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411174973","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10965194,0.00013974555,0.00015143114,0.83837485,0.00032754813,0.0003245564,0.000005323507,0.00006760998,0.05095698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944369,0.000062301784,0.0006248499,0.0025985343,0.00032959,0.00006884415,0.00005669784,0.00000557954,0.0018166886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961587,0.0022711675,0.00036653513,0.00024777502,0.0007073846,0.000248401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974114,0.0012599044,0.0001673225,0.00027977023,0.00068652345,0.00019512707],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121875545,0.00009755294,0.00009810017,0.00015114617,0.00074018806,0.0016479598,0.00026706487,0.00018996253,0.00018453323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028605029,0.00008306527,0.00002003842,0.001071097,0.0003765544,0.0023367542,0.000019502913,0.0007327297,0.0000424677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023958513,0.00019591863,0.0073552197,0.000004671171,0.0000034103762,0.000002466451,0.038492184,3.703684e-8,0.00000412449,0.94490165,0.007792576,0.0012237633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014815872,0.000097246375,0.0073212525,0.000002988992,0.000003408213,0.00000857939,0.0648007,0.000014077881,0.000015141553,0.014931971,0.9125558,0.000100661106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044375224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028466498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92996967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010368744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064318315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411204616","doi":"10.59057/iberoleon.20075316.20093773","title":"The University and the Construction of a New Ethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Entretextos (en línea, León, Gto.)/Entretextos","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.030255055526372795,"score_gpt":0.3435738087806242,"score_spread":0.3133187532542514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411204616","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10676448,0.0017704348,0.0010449776,0.74536574,0.0024180883,0.0017450918,0.000043798023,0.00024832744,0.14059904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971232,0.002853149,0.0008680475,0.002362503,0.0007269816,0.0000034957618,0.000015273332,0.000016638554,0.021921916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963707,0.0014526104,0.00053478277,0.00037375573,0.00077058404,0.0004976037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490833,0.0033517128,0.0005743367,0.00049582904,0.00042436196,0.00024540842],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002465621,0.00023897276,0.00031019998,0.00013330205,0.002319828,0.000379763,0.00064091507,0.00030777848,0.0010530056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003684138,0.00017486051,0.0001624649,0.0011034135,0.0017082063,0.0008638953,0.00007738689,0.00119463,0.00011775504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027909267,0.00006980022,0.0011903803,0.000010860996,0.00009409412,0.0000030600477,0.10980447,0.000012015818,0.000075671116,0.8046557,0.02217608,0.061628822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016262654,0.000068100075,0.0038362176,0.00004429256,0.00014113358,0.000012752118,0.054413665,0.00015012153,0.00015226759,0.020447273,0.9188409,0.00026704336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035875605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020695068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8966648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017741664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016802297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411268843","doi":"10.22318/icls2025.322165","title":"Qualitative Research in the Age of LLMs: A Human-in-the-Loop Approach to Hybrid Thematic Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Thematic map; Thematic analysis; Computer science; Loop (graph theory); Qualitative research; Sociology; Geography; Social science; Mathematics; Cartography","score_opus":0.3566284833994176,"score_gpt":0.595074222641302,"score_spread":0.23844573924188445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411268843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28381288,0.000030403959,0.00009630065,0.052344035,0.000023466435,0.0006021599,0.0000014295547,0.000008541983,0.6630808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963939,0.000005510628,0.000477432,0.00097564486,0.000034245033,0.0002452236,0.0000038106393,0.0000022563609,0.0018619389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982528,0.00047734723,0.00029075824,0.00016742299,0.0006000013,0.00021164736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840415,0.00097424234,0.00008043975,0.00011415231,0.00040998668,0.000017031141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014918212,0.000054052816,0.00014040887,0.00073448784,0.0003964302,0.00025398275,0.00063095876,0.00003025827,0.000023733443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034949244,0.000035346064,0.000044152217,0.010572863,0.00021140894,0.00027244346,0.000031416814,0.0004239941,0.000009029552],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033920364,0.00018752183,0.000697513,0.000029373894,0.000019716892,1.8758674e-7,0.47442138,0.0000011972492,0.000032890166,0.52017975,0.0043004523,0.00012660895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095643416,0.000018319352,0.003241876,0.00003735487,0.000042596777,1.6859889e-7,0.9272665,0.000033897482,0.000037421767,0.05106936,0.01809926,0.000057597346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004245345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010004512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71258104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082530125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021481035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.641772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411288310","doi":"10.1177/09646639251349395","title":"Legal Counsel, Moral Expectations, and Youth with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Economies of Worth in Youth Courts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Moral economy; Intellectual disability; Political science; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.0623797416919309,"score_gpt":0.35921744809790873,"score_spread":0.29683770640597784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411288310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9379952,0.0009207912,0.000006544769,0.0061642127,0.00015950782,0.00021869654,0.000036700905,0.000024747138,0.054473605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754846,0.00025504772,0.0001393242,0.00018789626,0.00007688403,0.000025507446,0.000010822395,0.0000053351714,0.0017506927],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999068,0.00011595831,0.00028275297,0.00019114384,0.00015499425,0.00018711503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989861,0.0006703616,0.000086684355,0.000038404636,0.00018857987,0.000029868743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003234459,0.000116240815,0.00024485166,0.00012067237,0.0008153261,0.00015322912,0.00006866894,0.000051513678,0.000032224863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014067938,0.000107925465,0.000020179048,0.00041640532,0.0013866615,0.0006496674,0.000044169534,0.00017664721,0.0000019670383],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005757525,0.00005565185,0.020817917,0.000015668133,0.00009183811,2.1973028e-7,0.8185102,4.780724e-7,6.485523e-7,0.15858662,0.0011423228,0.00072091335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031654182,0.000030147878,0.0057312804,0.000033463177,0.000036481335,3.1020195e-7,0.9823912,8.178459e-7,0.000009624502,0.0010176556,0.010313294,0.00011922232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010692047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033350993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.163881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001989067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081446517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99589586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411547918","doi":"10.1017/9781009578103.011","title":"Translations of Consulting Surgeons’ Manuals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04748433220154639,"score_gpt":0.416909653107814,"score_spread":0.3694253209062676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411547918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000018159748,0.000104733066,0.0006171206,0.018447975,0.00053346856,0.00018055427,0.00006794831,0.0001015982,0.97994477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037031604,0.00012856211,0.0017697441,0.00030538242,0.00008745394,0.000008455852,0.00002283115,0.000025142475,0.9939493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935514,0.00011425351,0.00018892126,0.00009523032,0.0001505656,0.00009587595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990887,0.00045234698,0.00017317953,0.00011765301,0.00014018157,0.000027916814],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038430435,0.00005885656,0.000120470286,0.00025352158,0.00012577217,0.000034754572,0.00010769701,0.00015028314,0.047461122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000790649,0.00006037373,0.00004045398,0.0005402639,0.00012243506,0.0000698567,0.000005238155,0.00014244327,0.00009863289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.0031586e-7,0.00001983455,0.00014487776,0.000010258256,0.000017398223,5.1911233e-8,0.0012299815,8.197153e-8,0.0000011198557,0.39552152,0.6009491,0.002105467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046046178,9.709546e-7,0.00005395493,0.000045715697,0.00001989791,3.296782e-8,0.0025531652,5.4267815e-7,0.000006536371,0.0005988032,0.9966136,0.000060683764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07074559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033148434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39566454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014460893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016879004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411585669","doi":"10.29173/alr2834","title":"Legal Ethics for Crown Attorneys on Appeal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Appeal; Crown (dentistry); Law; Legal ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Materials science","score_opus":0.11534644182191173,"score_gpt":0.4826892250749588,"score_spread":0.3673427832530471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411585669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015841224,0.002262892,0.00006233241,0.38918114,0.0006362694,0.00042628727,0.0000020279867,0.000016134667,0.6073971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21691525,0.022277817,0.000812531,0.5183541,0.00076670817,0.0005447367,0.00007103655,0.000023231518,0.24023455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989949,0.00026139253,0.00023361793,0.00016551364,0.00016930698,0.00017530403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706584,0.0023411254,0.000092221235,0.00021224034,0.0002361947,0.00005240333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00145238,0.00007466253,0.00015072538,0.000025034506,0.000765322,0.00013809623,0.00020900594,0.00009546203,0.0005477194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058959713,0.00006734683,0.000083597726,0.00049543864,0.0001602889,0.00030955064,0.000013944831,0.00037550108,0.00026490513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003004676,0.000036272366,0.000010542585,0.00029028053,0.000010956573,6.402245e-8,0.00047600514,1.0195966e-7,6.260359e-7,0.8622608,0.13332225,0.0035891044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000668253,0.000012195823,0.000021312577,0.0007592539,0.00004330337,1.7969147e-7,0.00007589047,8.8498297e-7,0.000006527054,0.0027360076,0.99620384,0.00007377464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034361023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03737876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8628816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006323567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001065539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9801866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411599541","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-062124-121908","title":"Law, Empires, Legal Professions, and Status Hierarchies: Comparative Perspectives","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal status; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Law; Legal pluralism; Legal profession; Law and economics; Legal realism; Sociology","score_opus":0.04568850723392285,"score_gpt":0.4741606614625519,"score_spread":0.42847215422862905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411599541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007697575,0.023955137,0.000011100437,0.059470437,0.00020783383,0.0003788881,0.000029883813,0.000020893382,0.9082283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759496,0.01489002,0.00019322074,0.007357586,0.00004916021,0.000015792397,0.0000021485362,0.0000015135442,0.0015410032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878263,0.0002693508,0.00020641924,0.0002008352,0.00032107852,0.00021965793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989264,0.00026742177,0.00011922667,0.00007090829,0.0005401484,0.0000759232],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014857427,0.00006867823,0.00019667011,0.000051906205,0.0023144018,0.00013606256,0.00016131568,0.000034059616,0.000043468503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000539456,0.000057482965,0.000025846006,0.00077947206,0.004225311,0.0012547909,0.00007187608,0.0001813118,0.0000017103148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030711617,0.00003640408,0.000066066495,0.00013856507,0.0000050203107,1.2295635e-7,0.10402008,3.1691632e-9,0.000012152963,0.8922047,0.0016304938,0.0018833309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063459665,0.000017183786,0.001270286,0.00038708173,0.000016256357,1.9954209e-7,0.11051821,3.3857526e-7,0.0000116686715,0.005934951,0.88171476,0.000065620734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00755667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012854397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050561175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001433807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656580","doi":"10.51847/vycir2i8i2","title":"10.51847/VyCir2i8i2","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Economic Justice; Medical education; Psychology; Political science; Law; Medicine; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.020467766740397537,"score_gpt":0.2973973772784542,"score_spread":0.2769296105380567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004116109,0.000008270356,4.1226326e-7,0.035023592,0.000009146714,0.00009787737,0.0000027246817,0.00008731144,0.96435905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015077663,4.885077e-7,0.0001357781,0.0007353358,0.00027119822,0.0000122934,0.000005336585,0.0000054623797,0.9973263],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994138,0.000073693904,0.00009416181,0.00009623415,0.00016728148,0.00015484077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958014,0.00009434802,0.000020961608,0.00011750299,0.00008251528,0.0001044979],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032835317,0.000042294567,0.000047855545,0.000047067588,0.00032732065,0.00012846883,0.00014177426,0.00003734968,0.99849594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029278814,0.00004493644,0.000019097282,0.00052855955,0.00004387533,0.00033151434,0.000006446799,0.00009416868,0.9888699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007415198,0.00003696333,4.385711e-7,4.2847188e-7,0.000003345596,3.3893522e-7,0.00092136784,0.0000041816097,0.000005372936,0.0005616869,0.22498934,0.7734691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003950359,0.000013454775,0.000053316246,0.0000019788897,0.000003895982,3.8553026e-7,0.000043814773,0.000003816796,0.0000020071395,0.000022031849,0.9997496,0.000066192006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011141845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008591201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77476025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042360934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025628667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25175187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656850","doi":"10.51847/zi1xtabnoy","title":"10.51847/zi1xtabnoy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0200240355321701,"score_gpt":0.29624650147355913,"score_spread":0.27622246594138905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059687166,0.000008015026,3.4173945e-7,0.03386548,0.000008677797,0.00009637547,0.0000027160938,0.00008730095,0.96533424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018557442,4.909514e-7,0.00013869985,0.0007172007,0.000260453,0.00001186594,0.0000041118064,0.0000054608236,0.997006],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994215,0.00007279953,0.00009301406,0.000094677525,0.00016473906,0.00015332211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958915,0.000089903464,0.000020556907,0.000115389885,0.00008153512,0.00010344564],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032331157,0.000041617128,0.000047208694,0.000045774384,0.0003210047,0.00012741728,0.00013863035,0.00003589703,0.9982936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027593243,0.000044197262,0.000018593712,0.00052190374,0.000042315947,0.00033975564,0.0000066125576,0.00009209863,0.98760515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007412988,0.000036080695,5.6327104e-7,4.014174e-7,0.0000030981396,4.3782794e-7,0.000878999,0.0000040281175,0.0000036504975,0.0005376843,0.19217671,0.80635095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039505438,0.000013007523,0.000064944965,0.0000019596937,0.0000037702941,5.340294e-7,0.000044580735,0.0000040024784,0.000002098794,0.000018594394,0.9997418,0.00006522691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001128998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008164708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8075651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039235416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024192876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24689412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411899333","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v32i2.1690","title":"Collective advocacy in the age of neoliberalism: Getting political in an interdisciplinary law clinic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Politics; Legal education; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.08426662778730143,"score_gpt":0.5668848604204777,"score_spread":0.48261823263317627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411899333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5096159,0.000069438895,0.0000835425,0.23391663,0.004681414,0.00019117526,0.0000025203685,0.0000050253025,0.25143436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833884,0.000024538025,0.0011005191,0.012894919,0.0011475406,0.000010669388,0.000010416925,0.000004861127,0.0014180879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958634,0.0015030338,0.0017802962,0.0001516713,0.0005222771,0.0001793367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455327,0.0035035464,0.0007149044,0.00012751787,0.0010354371,0.00006534447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062637543,0.00008272094,0.00026398848,0.00046016573,0.00014140537,0.00020173291,0.00078894437,0.0001339088,0.00013491145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005959799,0.0000690037,0.00015004183,0.00073764933,0.00043830136,0.0012458692,0.00006151767,0.0010240587,0.000005473427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025842426,0.0022749072,0.030595284,0.0000058254664,0.000040323936,0.000012290637,0.026990203,0.000012890212,0.00000800704,0.9258761,0.0025296756,0.011396062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015651516,0.00036010938,0.30568767,0.0004770347,0.000048594637,0.000021642229,0.079482846,0.0000498011,0.000020578878,0.3019477,0.31016463,0.00017421755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004575551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044603525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62392837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038535226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011816494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99378556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412230150","doi":"","title":"Theorizing the empirical turn in legal scholarship","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Turn (biochemistry); Political science; Sociology; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.3552337382506771,"score_gpt":0.458512381306195,"score_spread":0.10327864305551787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412230150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48438042,0.00042069802,0.00006944512,0.060044937,0.000108450564,0.0005526274,0.000020317248,0.00004261615,0.45436049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63015634,0.00019409358,0.00006122773,0.00007127031,0.000026453616,1.2971833e-7,0.000009654823,0.0000057684492,0.36947507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995257,0.002707754,0.00015547767,0.0002780241,0.0010743787,0.000527349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630064,0.0022841708,0.0001691975,0.00047755343,0.00061749516,0.00015096203],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008563552,0.00010141138,0.00020584592,0.00032116874,0.0034663875,0.00010019353,0.0017794049,0.00013306098,0.1787269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012367674,0.00009519894,0.00012445812,0.0042140353,0.0017220099,0.0013190076,0.0006211983,0.00093143573,0.049065746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021996161,0.0000796064,0.0001094265,0.000016531154,0.000046802426,0.000056286633,0.055596586,0.000033572254,0.0006175247,0.012849668,0.92823285,0.0021411944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003581535,0.0000378783,0.027090793,0.00002663506,0.000017420985,0.0000011882483,0.13399236,0.000058181577,0.00012323349,0.000118600445,0.83808786,0.00008771461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01247151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022176202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14577591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039070746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001722966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412267669","doi":"","title":"Book Review - Michael Legg, Prue Vines, and Janet Chan: The Impact of Technology and Innovation on the Wellbeing of the Legal Profession","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Management; Art history; Media studies; Art; Economics","score_opus":0.04847323051758125,"score_gpt":0.3719142173604834,"score_spread":0.3234409868429022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412267669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.617722,0.039945915,0.000047176458,0.23186557,0.00008408138,0.0017816228,0.000053936354,0.0000139009735,0.10848583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75384516,0.006219434,0.00004006594,0.00033238588,0.0000128722095,3.1186184e-7,0.000008178728,0.0000051895245,0.23953639],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974271,0.00138724,0.00017971186,0.00019719801,0.00059124135,0.0002174995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99694675,0.00084757444,0.00042909227,0.00049030746,0.0012434045,0.00004285883],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002964684,0.000095515075,0.00023721273,0.00020758915,0.0020127043,0.000025215117,0.00084538467,0.000104876905,0.044558242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094476633,0.00006183379,0.00008032324,0.0035811863,0.0019467907,0.0005140372,0.00064738205,0.00052175706,0.00020067435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000128542,0.00009076342,0.000034891807,0.00015018524,0.00009956819,0.0000044906733,0.008058641,0.00000372367,0.0054338095,0.029534958,0.9547721,0.0016882954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028011508,0.00010069342,0.00614204,0.0004323651,0.000055584635,0.0000045999054,0.03272808,0.000029315219,0.0022778562,0.000058760634,0.9578214,0.00006918387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034750793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010071676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23153318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013040945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014238872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412273463","doi":"","title":"Cultural, critical, global: criminology and criminal justice at the University","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal justice; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.28383589765423234,"score_gpt":0.4377890822549886,"score_spread":0.15395318460075624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412273463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38695517,0.0021793703,0.00032643377,0.047210556,0.00019434738,0.0005156861,0.000093653485,0.000039946495,0.56248486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6245405,0.0006074811,0.0003502449,0.00011899379,0.00003283728,4.6390813e-8,0.000014571809,0.0000051145453,0.37433022],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959002,0.0021568951,0.00013219449,0.000369762,0.00091569964,0.00052524824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954994,0.0015479175,0.00018062876,0.0004811261,0.0018916965,0.00039923494],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026689859,0.00014160355,0.0002536953,0.0001099034,0.005506455,0.00007724234,0.0014081998,0.00017609732,0.12266886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015219132,0.000136703,0.00010264,0.001025648,0.005762287,0.0012651009,0.0011146904,0.0005039284,0.016940473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005344543,0.00009918898,0.000011186662,0.00005179461,0.000066242435,0.000058487436,0.04023033,0.000009435375,0.00020441922,0.030667335,0.9270811,0.0009859927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046533855,0.000101664475,0.0017584937,0.000015187489,0.00024303656,0.000009586542,0.2896247,0.000029120094,0.000055162847,0.00005525955,0.7075349,0.00010753736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021975126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014045049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24939437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009619424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017089691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412528240","doi":"10.4324/9781003640028","title":"The Ethics of Argumentation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08863514892538454,"score_gpt":0.47653559245116367,"score_spread":0.3879004435257791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412528240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.60807e-7,0.00008434704,0.00010582049,0.15485431,0.00079536106,0.0001086586,0.0000029548498,0.000013236297,0.844035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011879545,0.0008832973,0.00016872857,0.001630139,0.00015117165,0.0000070368483,0.000019769583,0.000002143398,0.99701893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992915,0.00015386447,0.00016348655,0.000056045483,0.0002773031,0.00005779184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675566,0.002510339,0.00017690295,0.00010757552,0.0004362665,0.000013258232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014154923,0.000036308495,0.000048620932,0.000041931788,0.00064603455,0.00009551505,0.00015753503,0.00018059698,0.0007558416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021611669,0.000026698444,0.00002882965,0.00014751873,0.0001910153,0.00010966978,0.000011328681,0.0005661586,0.000041419153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.3898106e-7,0.0000031982336,0.0000012978933,0.0000045558195,0.0000071347317,8.859399e-9,0.0041500274,6.397894e-8,1.8496745e-7,0.6419723,0.3505618,0.003298887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013852004,0.0000021735536,0.0000063683515,0.0000146943985,0.000012283632,1.1906651e-8,0.0027454796,2.9519003e-7,0.0000045705942,0.07544159,0.9217327,0.000025969195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001569555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047537154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5711709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105337494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009665413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99594885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412673258","doi":"10.1145/3731120.3744588","title":"Principles and Guidelines for the Use of LLM Judges","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Universitas Brawijaya; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.511676247310532,"score_gpt":0.5246279955725135,"score_spread":0.012951748261981533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412673258","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008208307,0.00020218972,0.0058265547,0.8954931,0.00036184982,0.00029045125,0.000004185157,0.000022160943,0.089591205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4749125,0.0009882001,0.062978774,0.032970812,0.00031818842,0.00009583029,0.0000045662914,0.000005213192,0.4277259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997463,0.000021157977,0.00010641275,0.00003881852,0.00004713829,0.000040158688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823684,0.0011985566,0.00003693183,0.000060261464,0.00045925294,0.000008148437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040479188,0.00001707451,0.000027422393,0.00002321772,0.00024694134,0.000079569305,0.000052961266,0.000016351576,0.00010035126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006983558,0.000010477168,0.000010429112,0.00017930163,0.00008583374,0.00019882571,0.000011367562,0.000024850071,8.0718064e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001717573,0.000010528099,0.0018900656,0.0000026623254,0.0000065918025,2.2503033e-9,0.0011464165,0.00000571437,0.000011511698,0.87853485,0.10865838,0.009731568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030741074,0.000002601214,0.0027445199,0.0000030683718,0.000007763075,1.7682803e-8,0.0041650794,0.00014614644,0.0000565076,0.0013651378,0.9914651,0.000013299318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032291792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037295052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8828067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005649018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002628909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8360476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412800233","doi":"10.36253/sijis-2239-3978-16602","title":"Fiction as Fact and Legend as History: The Significance of the Irish-Canadian Novel The Yellow Briar and Its Author John Mitchell to the History of the Ontario Legal Profession","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studi irlandesi A Journal of Irish Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Legend; Law; Art history; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08402276436281633,"score_gpt":0.369267673520756,"score_spread":0.28524490915793965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412800233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48176783,0.01843751,0.000015457901,0.4200297,0.008336582,0.0014117691,0.000011003285,0.000006914576,0.06998325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471712,0.0006288201,0.000013841626,0.0022284251,0.00019030519,0.000022197897,1.1603519e-7,0.000005864904,0.04973923],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981267,0.0005568654,0.00045841295,0.00014730665,0.0005109212,0.00019983498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973144,0.000848638,0.00070966274,0.00023466726,0.00083167496,0.000060975373],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002629383,0.00013771863,0.0002535001,0.000087572545,0.0014973135,0.000050624767,0.0005186312,0.00006473537,0.000045489945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020777115,0.000057757887,0.00010538844,0.00043581455,0.000622748,0.0002712518,0.00012548937,0.0007012927,0.000001376343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006787707,0.00006818459,0.009393913,0.000025183108,0.00032951953,6.4265083e-7,0.21262689,0.000013555437,0.0003058222,0.0024989746,0.7741706,0.00049888174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020953798,0.000054888653,0.097098745,0.00011714533,0.00016866894,0.000005144072,0.06637168,0.0000017639217,0.000063893975,0.00008385637,0.83576256,0.0000621223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12459608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3943629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46540338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013209281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054837777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412993961","doi":"10.1515/eplj-2025-0006","title":"Editorial – Young Property Lawyers’ Forum Issue","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Property Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Engineering ethics; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02588125146948527,"score_gpt":0.3310650191178583,"score_spread":0.305183767648373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412993961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000078607256,0.00006118597,0.00013720033,0.10548512,0.0979469,0.00019894946,0.0000020752627,0.0000903295,0.79599965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34591377,0.00017948078,0.0011449399,0.011767928,0.17243722,0.000012575681,0.000007812477,0.000053793894,0.46848246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719876,0.001165838,0.00042740267,0.00021958708,0.00055867725,0.00042971942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985581,0.00007405516,0.00019188851,0.0002223781,0.00076454825,0.0001889976],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028425017,0.0001430272,0.00014124019,0.00010529646,0.0038129713,0.001375468,0.0005812668,0.000073756855,0.0013319913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012910555,0.00007813398,0.00008859146,0.0005639127,0.00032614227,0.0015115914,0.000087967055,0.0011878528,0.00097478146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035052057,0.00010535507,0.00019634936,0.0000049882656,0.00003218789,0.000009257367,0.004598543,0.0000018399605,0.000115926945,0.06680381,0.91246814,0.015628543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003642133,0.00004653988,0.000068680456,0.000051439874,0.00002233631,0.000015115089,0.0056742714,0.000004120573,0.00003619614,0.00070764,0.9928554,0.00015399558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069377227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039585577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34583515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018886189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001086258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413105546","doi":"10.32920/29896193.v1","title":"Don’t Dabble in Family Law: A Lesson in Negligence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Family law; Political science","score_opus":0.09511145722735594,"score_gpt":0.4549234589094668,"score_spread":0.35981200168211086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413105546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016877187,0.00018356666,0.0001625564,0.051472668,0.0016676905,0.00036262747,0.000008144401,0.00005233747,0.9292132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94856006,0.00043306604,0.001442759,0.0051841973,0.00013994897,0.0001342253,0.000020455831,0.0000046873956,0.04408063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864656,0.00026123587,0.000326013,0.0002994125,0.00023670509,0.00023007869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991466,0.0003304942,0.000104534956,0.00025218225,0.00012486281,0.000041346164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001110391,0.00010157206,0.0001584131,0.00026376374,0.00014045741,0.00025830808,0.00040962253,0.0002149593,0.00059481605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063383166,0.00010961473,0.00003420445,0.0009420609,0.00009625021,0.0003596475,0.00017478278,0.0010489733,0.00005279719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045200136,0.00013066211,0.004368375,0.000025847025,0.0000037546142,0.0000018889473,0.023627196,0.0001860268,0.000009424141,0.96147394,0.006709643,0.003458704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013146164,0.0000038768585,0.0076740296,0.00022606977,0.0000051554675,5.721803e-8,0.021655012,0.00010499316,0.000027305954,0.055288315,0.914648,0.00023570262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60849756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5297841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9316828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003560672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00350608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65128183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413161480","doi":"10.1177/09646639251366476","title":"Challenges Faced by Lawyers Representing Chinese Immigrants in Canada: Understanding Lawyer-Client Relationships Through Legal Consciousness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legal consciousness; Immigration; Consciousness; Law; Sociology; Legal profession; Legal service; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.1784854877967362,"score_gpt":0.4221680977939292,"score_spread":0.24368260999719302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413161480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23409009,0.006298379,0.00008363258,0.35903737,0.0023969698,0.0005995443,0.0000255622,0.000121842735,0.39734662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362296,0.0010652968,0.000031626936,0.00086787035,0.00020738952,0.00006708113,0.000008833306,0.0000118202215,0.0041171387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745303,0.0006344616,0.0004938318,0.00038817784,0.0005250769,0.0005054256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980983,0.0012247043,0.00023065612,0.00014028657,0.00025421713,0.00005182301],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012645028,0.00019674143,0.00036076276,0.00010935588,0.0034272235,0.000204727,0.00024016782,0.00011714507,0.000028332384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030158993,0.00019941568,0.000070751536,0.0014213016,0.0004239338,0.0010773421,0.00009521059,0.0007223984,0.0000066119974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002055195,0.00008672502,0.033190917,0.000039096813,0.00019532342,0.000009317706,0.111510314,0.000014134454,0.000018207742,0.8031158,0.051244434,0.0005551703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046089018,0.0000057005223,0.02056743,0.000060246508,0.00003531649,4.704911e-7,0.66827655,0.000006608763,0.000010139583,0.0134460665,0.29686818,0.0002624213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94013584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78966975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028380752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003212812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186294","doi":"10.32920/29896193","title":"Don’t Dabble in Family Law: A Lesson in Negligence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.09511145722735594,"score_gpt":0.4549234589094668,"score_spread":0.35981200168211086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016877187,0.00018356666,0.0001625564,0.051472668,0.0016676905,0.00036262747,0.000008144401,0.00005233747,0.9292132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94856006,0.00043306604,0.001442759,0.0051841973,0.00013994897,0.0001342253,0.000020455831,0.0000046873956,0.04408063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864656,0.00026123587,0.000326013,0.0002994125,0.00023670509,0.00023007869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991466,0.0003304942,0.000104534956,0.00025218225,0.00012486281,0.000041346164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001110391,0.00010157206,0.0001584131,0.00026376374,0.00014045741,0.00025830808,0.00040962253,0.0002149593,0.00059481605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063383166,0.00010961473,0.00003420445,0.0009420609,0.00009625021,0.0003596475,0.00017478278,0.0010489733,0.00005279719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045200136,0.00013066211,0.004368375,0.000025847025,0.0000037546142,0.0000018889473,0.023627196,0.0001860268,0.000009424141,0.96147394,0.006709643,0.003458704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013146164,0.0000038768585,0.0076740296,0.00022606977,0.0000051554675,5.721803e-8,0.021655012,0.00010499316,0.000027305954,0.055288315,0.914648,0.00023570262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60849756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5297841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9316828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003560672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00350608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65128183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186322","doi":"10.32920/29896196.v1","title":"Should There Be a Different Code of Conduct for Family Lawyers?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Code of conduct; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Programming language; Sociology","score_opus":0.3648351628268591,"score_gpt":0.5030932860361922,"score_spread":0.13825812320933306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03296755,0.00017635773,0.0021173866,0.18079753,0.0030928608,0.0016229154,0.00040107797,0.00010137359,0.77872294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8482204,0.0002380496,0.002669356,0.005581468,0.00030698118,0.00040297557,0.000103960905,0.0000111671525,0.14246565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988926,0.00014385521,0.0003041867,0.00023664704,0.00026146317,0.00016125516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815726,0.0007511272,0.00023983001,0.0002806637,0.0005200887,0.000051050414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005230249,0.00012424692,0.00023813134,0.00009808227,0.00022332491,0.00012428162,0.00038188984,0.0002710887,0.0009130994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079047075,0.0001045042,0.00012927156,0.00019316419,0.00014832611,0.000120356715,0.0001195538,0.00044788275,0.0000038242047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003272907,0.00022994522,0.00031190884,0.00013744313,0.000097852004,7.635195e-8,0.012448961,0.000012449184,0.000086630294,0.8472377,0.13792914,0.0014751623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031710937,0.0000147689925,0.0004053527,0.00005282811,0.00006531483,2.8014973e-8,0.018575652,0.000031146035,0.0002463255,0.014805942,0.9653351,0.00015043684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009271776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010130064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83243173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094899326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002139349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186385","doi":"10.32920/29896196","title":"Should There Be a Different Code of Conduct for Family Lawyers?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Code of conduct; Business; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Programming language; Sociology","score_opus":0.3648351628268591,"score_gpt":0.5030932860361922,"score_spread":0.13825812320933306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03296755,0.00017635773,0.0021173866,0.18079753,0.0030928608,0.0016229154,0.00040107797,0.00010137359,0.77872294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8482204,0.0002380496,0.002669356,0.005581468,0.00030698118,0.00040297557,0.000103960905,0.0000111671525,0.14246565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988926,0.00014385521,0.0003041867,0.00023664704,0.00026146317,0.00016125516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815726,0.0007511272,0.00023983001,0.0002806637,0.0005200887,0.000051050414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005230249,0.00012424692,0.00023813134,0.00009808227,0.00022332491,0.00012428162,0.00038188984,0.0002710887,0.0009130994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079047075,0.0001045042,0.00012927156,0.00019316419,0.00014832611,0.000120356715,0.0001195538,0.00044788275,0.0000038242047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003272907,0.00022994522,0.00031190884,0.00013744313,0.000097852004,7.635195e-8,0.012448961,0.000012449184,0.000086630294,0.8472377,0.13792914,0.0014751623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031710937,0.0000147689925,0.0004053527,0.00005282811,0.00006531483,2.8014973e-8,0.018575652,0.000031146035,0.0002463255,0.014805942,0.9653351,0.00015043684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009271776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010130064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83243173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094899326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002139349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186528","doi":"10.32920/29896172.v1","title":"Looking at Legal Ethics Through the Lens of Family Violence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lens (geology); Through-the-lens metering; Legal ethics; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law; Optics; Physics","score_opus":0.1696826318832342,"score_gpt":0.46751166106648395,"score_spread":0.2978290291832497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038877833,0.0002691436,0.0016386474,0.18199673,0.0023659542,0.00027997518,0.000023447566,0.000057281588,0.809481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90326196,0.0032683148,0.002589767,0.020102724,0.00048706567,0.00005140295,0.000022095364,0.000008524318,0.07020818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819034,0.0005119423,0.00033889565,0.00023994986,0.00053864624,0.0001802176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967462,0.0018362856,0.00032263368,0.00042981535,0.0006440269,0.000021061223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017868738,0.000112481146,0.00015351565,0.000050209608,0.00094588177,0.00018794062,0.0006477496,0.000389998,0.0005522218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026641418,0.00008525365,0.00009394639,0.00045628264,0.00047663646,0.00036204874,0.0004485132,0.0020331924,0.000035777655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036184156,0.000031798452,0.00013847821,0.00004083399,0.000026341828,1.6236905e-7,0.04712425,0.000085080625,0.000017601202,0.9407761,0.010748364,0.0010073346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003439193,0.0000036117594,0.00038691348,0.0001943191,0.000033999928,1.4469441e-7,0.019133907,0.000014582062,0.00010170297,0.027657622,0.95232713,0.00011164425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10738747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013460837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017717641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055337334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9816605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186529","doi":"10.32920/29896172","title":"Looking at Legal Ethics Through the Lens of Family Violence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lens (geology); Through-the-lens metering; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Optics; Physics","score_opus":0.1696826318832342,"score_gpt":0.46751166106648395,"score_spread":0.2978290291832497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038877833,0.0002691436,0.0016386474,0.18199673,0.0023659542,0.00027997518,0.000023447566,0.000057281588,0.809481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90326196,0.0032683148,0.002589767,0.020102724,0.00048706567,0.00005140295,0.000022095364,0.000008524318,0.07020818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819034,0.0005119423,0.00033889565,0.00023994986,0.00053864624,0.0001802176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967462,0.0018362856,0.00032263368,0.00042981535,0.0006440269,0.000021061223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017868738,0.000112481146,0.00015351565,0.000050209608,0.00094588177,0.00018794062,0.0006477496,0.000389998,0.0005522218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026641418,0.00008525365,0.00009394639,0.00045628264,0.00047663646,0.00036204874,0.0004485132,0.0020331924,0.000035777655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036184156,0.000031798452,0.00013847821,0.00004083399,0.000026341828,1.6236905e-7,0.04712425,0.000085080625,0.000017601202,0.9407761,0.010748364,0.0010073346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003439193,0.0000036117594,0.00038691348,0.0001943191,0.000033999928,1.4469441e-7,0.019133907,0.000014582062,0.00010170297,0.027657622,0.95232713,0.00011164425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10738747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013460837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017717641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055337334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9816605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413383053","doi":"10.32920/29913059","title":"Pragmatic Assorted Strategies: How Canadian Cause Lawyers Contribute to Social Change","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07732422968167321,"score_gpt":0.41340574872562524,"score_spread":0.336081519043952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413383053","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006025925,0.0000075012977,0.00023568014,0.6064911,0.0006381335,0.00040946968,0.00003252705,0.00006845645,0.3860912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94481283,0.000005693764,0.00014890757,0.021457851,0.00026884538,0.00010523544,0.000025117763,0.0000042679003,0.03317127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990765,0.00015720776,0.00011710555,0.0001307044,0.00018341141,0.00033507927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991481,0.00017058641,0.000050003106,0.00009674912,0.0003387301,0.00019586236],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006158153,0.000069871574,0.000095257084,0.00023311988,0.0009910058,0.0007430904,0.00017113761,0.00009676436,0.00096182595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00111952,0.000071926144,0.000025847296,0.0013964286,0.00006290412,0.0008742032,0.000010945762,0.0001775668,0.00012568488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016130648,0.000017126977,0.00037111205,0.0000040415234,0.000027854026,0.0000012442662,0.02773056,2.7412503e-7,0.000010315787,0.78303134,0.18772571,0.0010788292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010802713,0.0000057437883,0.005871679,0.0000066734337,0.000018279541,8.7747175e-8,0.050722815,0.000006940216,0.00000490228,0.001559137,0.9416058,0.0000898964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7300464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9655381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93878686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040903615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004638603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413388151","doi":"10.18260/1-2--57116","title":"Reflections on Teaching Ethics Unethically [evidence-based practice, DEI]","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.2726168121599871,"score_gpt":0.5981414042861035,"score_spread":0.3255245921261164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413388151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010832057,0.000016525717,0.010023612,0.4829277,0.0005899982,0.00010300358,3.5551412e-7,0.00011357425,0.5061169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71090794,0.000101154714,0.021100454,0.20683302,0.00026393708,0.00004326527,0.0000032595844,0.000006900225,0.060740083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971634,0.0017163206,0.0002346612,0.00021239548,0.00047447075,0.0001987429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98306334,0.015825694,0.000114013535,0.00023455045,0.00068861654,0.00007376673],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064870007,0.00007706585,0.000075004216,0.00022685553,0.0025377448,0.00047713018,0.00022166572,0.00025309954,0.0007946008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11065349,0.00007333203,0.00004391146,0.0011948559,0.00017345784,0.0012232524,0.000016834778,0.0026824437,0.00028887452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022289141,0.00016094338,0.0000614562,0.000005115187,0.000011986383,5.105182e-7,0.007179128,0.00004795437,0.000067078756,0.9537061,0.035581507,0.0031559728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077069424,0.000031403233,0.0002023031,0.00008897077,0.000025020952,2.2665189e-7,0.01117063,0.000031762018,0.00006368541,0.0089889355,0.9792361,0.000083837345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009072268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043944167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9447171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024352045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060375957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413416151","doi":"10.29173/mlj1427","title":"Legal Ethics for Government Lawyers: Lessons from Nunavut","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.11283053611262844,"score_gpt":0.43764900121245376,"score_spread":0.3248184650998253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413416151","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012549144,0.00012394712,0.0066589615,0.52742386,0.0049451045,0.00023850855,0.000058226804,0.000044526136,0.44795772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797818,0.00009037014,0.0031446815,0.01260632,0.0015974722,0.000022798573,0.0000067176134,0.00000856398,0.0027412602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986947,0.00021939196,0.0002429956,0.00012394864,0.00049359805,0.00022536593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830633,0.0010221887,0.00015742533,0.00011676093,0.00030703074,0.00009027751],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014357273,0.000075843076,0.00009636198,0.000029418547,0.002758789,0.0009775332,0.00027635536,0.00013113745,0.00037003402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013620716,0.000074905845,0.00007697876,0.00021769451,0.00014565192,0.0007155138,0.000025963294,0.0010350465,0.000034739438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002044412,0.00007844028,0.00024577513,0.00000355146,0.000045125376,0.000001863139,0.0033300014,0.00000397485,0.000041927226,0.95329356,0.035148975,0.007786371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025361977,0.000011758044,0.0003600016,0.000027011136,0.000036099013,0.0000015672177,0.07447212,0.000009014463,0.00010691619,0.046118878,0.87852836,0.000074642354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0822442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5752493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96723264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045951808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011494921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413421280","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/28b3q_v1","title":"The Use of Psychopathy Assessments in Canadian Case Law: A Quantitative and Qualitative Survey of Court Records from 1980-2023","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychopathy; Law; Survey data collection; Psychology; Survey research; Political science; Criminology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Statistics; Personality; Mathematics","score_opus":0.27616405461847715,"score_gpt":0.54563744652529,"score_spread":0.26947339190681285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413421280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89413923,0.00008904546,0.0001837134,0.023343109,0.000625704,0.00031681318,0.0004729891,0.0000058892447,0.08082348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952064,0.0000597617,0.0016798476,0.00052826613,0.000004757709,0.000011278543,0.000017491104,0.0000021519847,0.0024900148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979792,0.0013904499,0.00027568766,0.000106202235,0.000120815006,0.00012762695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923425,0.0068754726,0.00013588257,0.00010743234,0.00047913115,0.000059623933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028022632,0.000046274956,0.00010642112,0.00011947089,0.00027311165,0.000093491915,0.00008149942,0.000044805074,0.00007683436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004085667,0.000037726713,0.000011881845,0.00096292584,0.00028679104,0.00040878967,0.000010052822,0.00013104979,0.0000019875747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003792002,0.000064162006,0.053977787,0.000003330957,0.000043617314,0.000003359513,0.08451356,0.0000011917526,0.00000561146,0.8505749,0.009562522,0.0012120035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004462559,0.00007111614,0.316888,0.000055609074,0.00002189279,6.037362e-7,0.43442297,0.00026478394,0.000016739974,0.013975448,0.2336864,0.000150149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99898726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99963224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83659947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009317062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022624482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48912203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413462529","doi":"10.29173/mlj1385","title":"Crown Attorneys, The Attorney General, and Judicial Discipline: A Comment on Lauzon v Ontario (Justices of the Peace Review Council)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07076072556794086,"score_gpt":0.3566498019347912,"score_spread":0.28588907636685035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413462529","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067586504,0.0044330354,0.00002300629,0.6883203,0.003330175,0.0005276982,0.0000074925633,0.000014123456,0.2357577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90962327,0.0058425423,0.00013968043,0.07898982,0.0013955513,0.000024702656,0.0000023241432,0.000010078875,0.003972061],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838424,0.00039975185,0.0003289764,0.00010971141,0.0006105361,0.00016680107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986431,0.000320789,0.00032354446,0.00020178477,0.00045546427,0.000055318716],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002391171,0.00009160545,0.00014070766,0.00002113029,0.0024362782,0.00031165776,0.00038808957,0.000043937474,0.00033796477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006399214,0.000052063555,0.000067805835,0.000322761,0.00035471807,0.00023871397,0.000075652955,0.0006948516,0.0000075383064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002882368,0.00014648742,0.0028003848,0.00006526499,0.000058688023,0.0000011204297,0.0075189997,0.000007796713,0.00001332334,0.47817776,0.5071977,0.003983689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014217592,0.000022701537,0.009899187,0.00043159592,0.00011640364,0.000004463536,0.0074066897,0.0000024830206,0.000009649459,0.0012540275,0.980651,0.000059574275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33522907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8980714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8420367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062535773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001982268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413465440","doi":"10.29173/mlj1380","title":"The Access to Justice Needs of Manitobans: Legal Practitioners’ Views","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Business; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0823921803741973,"score_gpt":0.4245655815090533,"score_spread":0.34217340113485606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413465440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012206826,0.00017679631,0.0024214156,0.26757064,0.0055151703,0.00031364337,0.0000036857157,0.000029268032,0.71176255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824123,0.00030700167,0.00057985814,0.012306216,0.0014017905,0.00002776321,0.0000018188896,0.000009079237,0.002954174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985105,0.00037496863,0.00040839092,0.000076385324,0.00038491172,0.00024489287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979941,0.0006768434,0.00029866997,0.00018430386,0.00073910673,0.00010696652],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018922635,0.00008219391,0.00010863332,0.00017834955,0.0035700786,0.0018111663,0.0006659864,0.00005753554,0.00021106901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014707505,0.000063606036,0.00006456151,0.0013220087,0.00019339804,0.0018136497,0.00006278651,0.0006034435,0.00006853897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026267402,0.000070453876,0.0002083531,0.0000089280375,0.000034719404,0.0000017794094,0.0033943392,0.000011595415,0.000043241074,0.86184216,0.118711844,0.015646337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009347965,0.000015087967,0.00069898186,0.000029433935,0.00006187259,0.000008844438,0.16266903,0.0000014308437,0.00008208602,0.0070903795,0.8291904,0.000058971833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04080399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3531833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018882792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009781636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413465663","doi":"10.29173/mlj1375","title":"Leading by Example: The Jurisprudence of Chief Justice Richard J.F. Chartier","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Management; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.04243924444402177,"score_gpt":0.367892419507148,"score_spread":0.32545317506312627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413465663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1162928,0.0009718353,0.0030439901,0.17754403,0.005685494,0.00029082017,0.000008983855,0.000049841434,0.6961122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99218667,0.00018183162,0.00020703484,0.003831941,0.0005533335,0.000006036976,0.0000010536866,0.000004746212,0.0030273714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883986,0.0002580685,0.00027575047,0.000090939044,0.00033204947,0.00020335603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883956,0.00043317935,0.00022438158,0.00013512628,0.00031043479,0.000057312405],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015439881,0.00006456995,0.00009332322,0.000059485144,0.0020953405,0.00035650248,0.00038823782,0.000050001807,0.000433534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006123464,0.000049252765,0.000043928118,0.0006078697,0.00026083787,0.0005834796,0.000028619152,0.0005902907,0.00005088782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009855396,0.00008332136,0.00077303144,0.000013133703,0.000036720165,0.0000011948737,0.007618001,0.0000043652767,0.0006059368,0.76109123,0.21815167,0.011611549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092980095,0.0000105679355,0.0006796844,0.000026397374,0.000059664715,0.0000043301025,0.04311408,0.0000051860875,0.00039385265,0.0042691147,0.951287,0.000057196936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025726935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028095067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87589383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009153727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038238548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413561615","doi":"10.64628/aam.kkg3upyp9","title":"COVID-19: Don’t make university students choose between education and legal rights","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Legal education; Political science; Virology; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.06691779344499749,"score_gpt":0.4229838240640015,"score_spread":0.356066030619004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413561615","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13125373,0.000068665635,0.0010943586,0.44043618,0.0023821832,0.0009983244,0.000083851184,0.00029922838,0.42338347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.931507,0.000097873366,0.0012288871,0.0050819004,0.0010118365,0.000007515806,0.00018668687,0.000008274284,0.060870025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983824,0.00037989457,0.00019367898,0.00041572077,0.0004604598,0.00016788093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984249,0.0002534237,0.00022171016,0.0002198642,0.0002116624,0.0006684407],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006026886,0.00014086494,0.00017403156,0.0001588218,0.000994403,0.00062129693,0.000516876,0.00024724446,0.0015087104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009818117,0.00015267344,0.00004674331,0.00041563244,0.00017974066,0.00045832852,0.00035332658,0.00075022556,0.00007501213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025682953,0.0004793431,0.060906436,0.000122229,0.00017747126,0.000009061961,0.0424764,0.0000047903013,0.0000023261034,0.7371602,0.14946717,0.009168902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014139288,0.0000065041277,0.018307919,0.000010120874,0.000067103596,4.6502754e-7,0.012086816,0.000001318418,0.0000017900566,0.010466331,0.95872945,0.00018076833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11955034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013806769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8092623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061208603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0109629035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413620206","doi":"10.64628/aam.yxjcvccax","title":"Morality isn’t a compass — it’s a calculator","year":2017,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Compass; Calculator; Morality; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Cartography; Geography; Operating system","score_opus":0.17256524859716596,"score_gpt":0.48029977314786987,"score_spread":0.30773452455070394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413620206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012999479,0.000016541751,0.000055477278,0.49187812,0.0019317318,0.00015859344,0.000012927523,0.000033515116,0.4929136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84456533,0.000032142845,0.00038392973,0.007399524,0.00068824645,0.000012617435,0.000005045535,0.000007897008,0.14690524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982975,0.00023027565,0.00034386988,0.0002999956,0.00046400772,0.00036432437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997853,0.0001927636,0.00046550462,0.0008679995,0.0003842898,0.0002364493],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012889417,0.00014215779,0.00019764036,0.000046899197,0.003980283,0.002372542,0.0007847957,0.00016471294,0.023489175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021077532,0.00013546417,0.00010063519,0.0002107268,0.0006548427,0.0019805583,0.000118248005,0.00044941608,0.0029187957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073449446,0.00022645817,0.0069605093,0.000010109976,0.00003514113,0.0000018476907,0.0112929465,6.5760565e-7,0.000014022612,0.5678395,0.41174683,0.0018646606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021113253,0.0000133627955,0.05711419,0.000014694704,0.000033531076,8.170221e-7,0.010613056,0.000165224,0.000025826683,0.00095679384,0.93065804,0.000193333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09730685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015876926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83156586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014922857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015467539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413654283","doi":"10.64628/aam.ucmp7d5mu","title":"A good first step towards diverse, impartial Canadian juries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07108199636161976,"score_gpt":0.3919760693293866,"score_spread":0.32089407296776684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413654283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005405765,0.000022518152,0.00008851964,0.16792126,0.004844302,0.0003081875,0.00009533258,0.000103888,0.8212102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430354,0.00007543589,0.0018152279,0.0029046969,0.002715208,0.000066913875,0.00009085904,0.000014886409,0.049281336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860525,0.00012458678,0.0002275707,0.00029000358,0.00036181367,0.0003907824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854773,0.000086643166,0.00014688305,0.0003150576,0.0005194523,0.00038421355],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070365844,0.00014355606,0.00014971365,0.00019841382,0.0013541817,0.0008131052,0.00046027268,0.0003299708,0.019043926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091644184,0.00014402128,0.000076952914,0.00036599935,0.00032875952,0.00040937882,0.00017060846,0.00056987,0.00096566597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005965115,0.00005368399,0.0021720536,0.000018344159,0.000067248984,0.0000038566554,0.041863114,0.0000029625019,1.571636e-7,0.1882982,0.7632413,0.004273123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005319852,0.000010372063,0.002054138,0.000013439116,0.000027822854,4.0878376e-7,0.0075340914,0.000016429361,0.00000462385,0.0018394592,0.9882502,0.0001958406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.974273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93762964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054074463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015644656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413790402","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/28b3q_v2","title":"The Use of Psychopathy Assessments in Canadian Case Law: A Quantitative and Qualitative Survey of Court Records from 1980-2023","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychopathy; Survey data collection; Psychology; Qualitative property; Political science; Social psychology; Statistics; Personality; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3566998473778279,"score_gpt":0.5550894954391922,"score_spread":0.19838964806136428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413790402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78228825,0.00038632503,0.00047281955,0.038896397,0.0038341093,0.0016512721,0.010195481,0.000021910544,0.16225344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897242,0.0003335538,0.0050259144,0.00047133863,0.00001866909,0.00005223862,0.0001789831,0.000005906805,0.0041892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568725,0.0030802095,0.0005430712,0.00025256677,0.00024236835,0.00019452172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877635,0.010390797,0.00045566406,0.00026066214,0.0010197902,0.00010954984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004824958,0.00011489658,0.00026368132,0.00021828026,0.00030393223,0.00020161673,0.00020644498,0.000176492,0.00011277074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062775863,0.00009872174,0.000032665263,0.00075169717,0.00042141209,0.00032351373,0.000070202805,0.0005368984,0.0000020432908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008209323,0.00014841158,0.03389155,0.00003296118,0.0001966087,0.000011438031,0.25848293,0.000017839164,0.0000013111337,0.69112676,0.014305201,0.0017028886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062196126,0.00010935851,0.1696491,0.0004203762,0.00010015171,0.000001394278,0.52550215,0.0007933667,0.000009255658,0.039707292,0.26250887,0.00057674886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99966365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65141946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022677325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007672553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803146","doi":"10.29173/mlj1448","title":"Preface and Issue Overview","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Conscience; Government (linguistics); Law; Legislature; Executive branch; Political science; Loyalty; Representation (politics); History; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04891198903226107,"score_gpt":0.4034369761268036,"score_spread":0.35452498709454255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020467648,0.0014796937,0.00012479714,0.18139598,0.0017703316,0.000099125326,9.922747e-7,0.000028732655,0.7946327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789632,0.0013095028,0.0007960371,0.010421144,0.00090406113,0.0000042832676,7.2103404e-7,0.0000044630674,0.0075965896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994399,0.0001316111,0.00012225777,0.00006007298,0.00013330407,0.00011287345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995858,0.00010271669,0.00006140377,0.000056204488,0.00013559249,0.000058250283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006273292,0.000038552873,0.000053234704,0.00004331576,0.0012813843,0.000515799,0.00010276003,0.00003620621,0.0007616754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023620285,0.00003584703,0.000017019858,0.00024578374,0.000096849355,0.0005298316,0.000018146551,0.00031506678,0.000063616586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027595038,0.000028132055,0.0010380603,0.0000070094297,0.000013540738,0.0000016317919,0.0021343145,4.898705e-7,0.000009805075,0.91059077,0.04416826,0.04200525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078066485,0.00000505661,0.002015964,0.00002077078,0.000011225883,0.000006533471,0.021633662,0.0000013374819,0.000014176899,0.017879201,0.9582964,0.000037609156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025616832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11370255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95849556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006172923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026588497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98555017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413821460","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v55i3.190475","title":"What Is Prohibited? Non-Academic Conduct Policies in Canadian Universities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.03971742896507052,"score_gpt":0.4084422059287941,"score_spread":0.3687247769637236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413821460","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4145392,0.0032371327,9.873519e-7,0.4641617,0.008863865,0.00016258676,0.00000663276,0.000004041818,0.109023854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88230675,0.0001658159,0.000038260798,0.012716748,0.00034028452,0.000002890236,0.000004866379,0.0000043715713,0.104419984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999109,0.000107401866,0.00025859484,0.000081912454,0.0001175079,0.00032556185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986099,0.000070028196,0.00015791945,0.00009047266,0.0005471743,0.0005245046],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049924094,0.00006875066,0.000099787976,0.0015199647,0.0004110847,0.00033433075,0.00025175101,0.00012271464,0.0014095881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010895348,0.00007786357,0.000031303105,0.0013406741,0.00015889884,0.002113078,0.0000028239583,0.00045930585,0.000022698694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004643931,0.000023673814,0.06783522,0.000013777652,0.000025008307,0.000006051702,0.09926119,0.000007230545,0.000033521268,0.19600101,0.63453275,0.002255963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006727091,0.0000071297604,0.049451668,0.00011446632,0.000011496521,0.0000026051778,0.07988162,4.34997e-7,0.000023729295,0.0019370479,0.86843646,0.00006609405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95843196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9647549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46776757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025582847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11107554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413838529","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp19809","title":"Ethics and the Professional Practice of Family Lawyers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Legal ethics; Professional ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.2005240152208256,"score_gpt":0.5238302371174278,"score_spread":0.3233062218966022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413838529","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007953123,0.00012622247,0.00033374023,0.73926324,0.00040283543,0.00059100153,0.0000016367343,0.00003697029,0.25129125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98262227,0.0023768279,0.00065947033,0.0027429815,0.00013018012,0.00012560318,0.0000020374014,0.0000074936574,0.011333119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610174,0.0013720825,0.00038070825,0.00030621208,0.0014118252,0.0004274234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826625,0.009875617,0.0002333828,0.00015463888,0.006956965,0.0001168912],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020040927,0.00010967768,0.00018918255,0.00033009262,0.0021413271,0.0006164441,0.0005354186,0.00021324556,0.000028549539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043083847,0.00008114669,0.00003742658,0.0020247821,0.00503389,0.0014426829,0.00022497874,0.0027460218,0.000015621736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017819369,0.00007738556,0.00036480502,0.000067334026,0.000039764378,3.422727e-7,0.07832714,1.3246522e-7,0.0001694618,0.8960285,0.022868652,0.0018782621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005308496,0.000027580138,0.0003604866,0.000170891,0.000021579483,8.7549745e-7,0.2354593,0.00005237677,0.000101488804,0.27944964,0.48373884,0.00008609266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008981711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015573937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97466916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012431756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062795207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413859660","doi":"10.1080/07294360.2025.2514505","title":"Centring First Nations knowings in the literature review: a focus on decolonising law curriculum","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Research & Development","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Centring; Curriculum; Focus (optics); Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Political science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.041858245083769306,"score_gpt":0.4585415680573213,"score_spread":0.41668332297355204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413859660","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041021784,0.0067628818,0.000004065061,0.5332017,0.0011306579,0.0010030887,8.916977e-7,0.000031432748,0.4537631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94729954,0.008006952,0.0010577757,0.013618336,0.00029199172,0.001310248,0.000042612377,0.00000945751,0.028363092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975067,0.0007214298,0.00033238938,0.000262041,0.00079121464,0.00038625894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974379,0.0012308147,0.0000728331,0.00025232,0.00093227555,0.00007389145],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039347806,0.000096358,0.000095446296,0.00061667967,0.0029076594,0.0007012298,0.00046032868,0.00007774702,0.0004296524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00192143,0.00007842531,0.000029897792,0.005845607,0.00011664048,0.00047942164,0.000046237645,0.0007664061,0.00016006842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021743185,0.00048206557,0.001388808,0.00012025811,0.0000076011515,0.0000010180272,0.019247377,7.8356373e-7,0.0000011322387,0.82785636,0.14718467,0.003707769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007698296,0.0000055019136,0.016139451,0.002573199,0.0000035581477,4.1493405e-7,0.00394294,2.8161256e-7,0.000022127846,0.0036544225,0.97349834,0.00008280264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021585552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0100529445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94319737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009496469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005074078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99839044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414240183","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v10i1.8451","title":"The State of Court Administration in Ontario: A Preliminary Analysis of the Post-COVID Environment in the Ontario Court of Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Economic Justice; State (computer science); Administration of justice; Federal court; Quality (philosophy); Court decision","score_opus":0.0664099398318384,"score_gpt":0.3497512421572769,"score_spread":0.28334130232543847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414240183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65821284,0.000034001518,0.000014716764,0.33219367,0.00030398704,0.00024514683,0.000023187316,9.972732e-7,0.008971442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887544,0.000029522924,0.00007694309,0.00071255444,0.00004238479,0.0000045407837,0.00000470946,0.000003777349,0.00025011218],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782795,0.0006261393,0.00070572534,0.00008730474,0.00056398555,0.00018891935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652475,0.0020154447,0.0008278734,0.00022320333,0.00026588398,0.00014283796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035323778,0.00007249433,0.0001934759,0.00036115744,0.00026025533,0.000055150726,0.0003981867,0.000056367902,0.00025653714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003198599,0.00004618417,0.000121241465,0.001382462,0.00043820552,0.0004209568,0.000013805382,0.0007667083,0.0000032526636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012950248,0.0012219899,0.23215559,0.00006873584,0.0012022208,0.00023602194,0.51917183,0.0082603395,0.0002001523,0.22667405,0.0077956845,0.0017183331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003412059,0.00042299536,0.8542817,0.000052087526,0.00091793056,0.000014685842,0.020572547,0.000088324035,0.000028374301,0.02359578,0.099571586,0.00011276109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7327038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62212616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006514963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014107147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99148196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414249195","doi":"10.1017/s0021855325100703","title":"How Far Are Kenya’s Courts? Distance as a Barrier to Justice in Kenya","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Population; Distribution (mathematics); Rural area; Information and Communications Technology; Rural population","score_opus":0.02326194269251455,"score_gpt":0.3570913743589067,"score_spread":0.3338294316663922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414249195","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025307827,0.00020390737,0.0010581469,0.5118826,0.0017683835,0.00015095428,0.000009048522,0.00001334704,0.45960575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97402394,0.00003828429,0.00073481444,0.007493144,0.00031130773,0.0000039286006,2.69002e-7,0.0000046352357,0.017389707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889696,0.00016644831,0.0002818219,0.000097426804,0.00036406718,0.00019326544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985435,0.00032931956,0.00032491007,0.00011484949,0.0005355054,0.00015192147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091450696,0.00006947173,0.00016009812,0.00019358683,0.00030359367,0.0004077032,0.00028576766,0.00005313127,0.00016803302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031027251,0.000064098895,0.000050956318,0.0010724966,0.00012743962,0.0008403096,0.000018918243,0.00039643433,0.000016087117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056877932,0.000114566195,0.0013244288,0.000011089902,0.000020952622,0.000022190969,0.014502095,0.000022646225,0.00007901427,0.9313725,0.051416453,0.0010571878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001539761,0.000029138891,0.0021490774,0.000055035904,0.000031496984,0.0000025945506,0.04651356,0.0000024097615,0.00002643392,0.0053544496,0.9456125,0.000069338086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011894751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006785916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9487161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027673444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012103899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39314914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414308736","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2025.2543718","title":"Revisiting Professionalism and Breach of Confidentiality: Are “Neutral” Conditions the Answer?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The American Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Liability; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.11543127380572936,"score_gpt":0.4620819013892313,"score_spread":0.3466506275835019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414308736","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004869366,0.0003595779,0.000055556964,0.99060535,0.0008683265,0.00015338589,0.00006945472,0.000006859187,0.0030121394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21573384,0.0012978071,0.00016199646,0.77580655,0.0039231502,0.0000061571022,0.000019244924,0.000013439778,0.003037827],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962375,0.0022938463,0.00059857924,0.00010496738,0.0005909149,0.00017419741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906105,0.0045536202,0.0032173519,0.00024373522,0.0013416944,0.000033091383],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044293893,0.00011742686,0.0003596274,0.00014575713,0.0009476191,0.0001940197,0.0005874768,0.00017725852,0.00007480835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017894913,0.00006958892,0.00012926586,0.0007651153,0.0043119714,0.00020983703,0.000050383485,0.0044033835,0.0000017785459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022083332,0.000028418706,0.00019515023,0.000092190116,0.00025381165,0.000010894092,0.030330433,0.0000013390387,0.00002559994,0.060857285,0.90333134,0.004851438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069069494,0.00002970848,0.00090979494,0.0004840625,0.00023969631,0.000034070647,0.06669989,6.9035514e-7,0.000017661196,0.007754172,0.92366695,0.000094221294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057007223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013754873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21479881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048597703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023230363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414328779","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-96132-0_8410","title":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Legal Studies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.055603905620074,"score_gpt":0.36849146626370655,"score_spread":0.31288756064363255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414328779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000067698606,0.0009242483,0.000043211217,0.01499035,0.003445748,0.0009884146,0.00034647962,0.00007790822,0.9791769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5313166,0.000307297,0.0009978488,0.0027606545,0.0007573735,0.00015656717,0.00015840214,0.000030103498,0.4635152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984951,0.000033754128,0.00037811502,0.0003827652,0.0002736515,0.00043664186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980503,0.0003372002,0.00023273802,0.00033170148,0.00080052734,0.00024758978],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044452012,0.00028550762,0.00035797097,0.00044200098,0.001197542,0.00018996767,0.0003479636,0.00030200116,0.0002911552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008951426,0.00030408235,0.00016155383,0.00006075115,0.00036097824,0.0000057028005,0.00003960618,0.0004158974,0.0000721839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010426915,1.795627e-7,0.000005671278,0.0000370171,0.00015515873,0.000005748988,0.0026704376,6.68137e-7,0.0000016247195,0.9726478,0.003671578,0.020793682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112168804,0.000012758782,0.0000031172228,0.000071158465,0.000054083433,6.2452244e-7,0.000741363,4.3453676e-7,0.0000043104083,0.4214644,0.5773371,0.00019846458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14145747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87887114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7374137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007995831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007027956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414402343","doi":"10.56238/sevened2025.029-089","title":"DIAGNOSTIC REDUCTIONISM AND THE SCIENTIFIC QUALIFICATION OF EXPERT TESTIMONY IN FAMILY LAW","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Seven Editora eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Relevance (law); Phenomenon; Reasonable doubt; Alienation; Expert witness; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.03826863437056187,"score_gpt":0.3461668717703095,"score_spread":0.30789823739974764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414402343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000114558236,0.0006085511,0.000022246924,0.013299676,0.01642677,0.0006090983,0.000024202485,0.00003319775,0.9688617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11888621,0.00016792622,0.0002695975,0.0007411692,0.0071765324,0.00013679863,0.000046868394,0.0000214513,0.87255347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855447,0.00017433851,0.0004146102,0.0002821,0.0004343979,0.00014010243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668586,0.0022008212,0.00033073558,0.0003240554,0.0004132073,0.00004531169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016760307,0.00013136829,0.00020523455,0.00019493699,0.00069633167,0.00029823222,0.00024908394,0.00023820045,0.000056309796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017924755,0.00011391057,0.000050289233,0.00010274601,0.0021614113,0.00018454465,0.000041057378,0.00046300198,0.000016737386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009365356,0.000014248369,0.0000026870819,0.000012719824,0.000012270163,3.7862097e-7,0.017263675,4.7660689e-7,0.000017690476,0.8930709,0.083596975,0.005998629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017990307,0.00000619477,0.000020179661,0.00013929552,0.000024137866,3.1888487e-7,0.0030581139,0.0000032562493,0.000013339194,0.09105056,0.90539694,0.000107735206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009897896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003041573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010891903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015165217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414429367","doi":"10.29242/lawstats.2024","title":"ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 2024","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ARL academic law and medical library statistics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Academic library; Official statistics; Statistical analysis","score_opus":0.023295787634295666,"score_gpt":0.3472992829744113,"score_spread":0.32400349534011563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414429367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000021468984,0.0031119112,0.0023216347,0.06398874,0.0035984623,0.00055545766,0.008889072,0.000350392,0.9171822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00009581289,0.036468435,0.010022569,0.088588804,0.0035039412,0.00004563329,0.0045073903,0.00009685031,0.85667056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948191,0.0005343635,0.0013580198,0.00078697695,0.0016682757,0.0008332494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99142337,0.006213951,0.000607656,0.00037349277,0.00011602295,0.0012655378],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008354091,0.00055088405,0.0007240166,0.00022119393,0.0010291507,0.0004474226,0.001206301,0.002841151,0.016647935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022381754,0.0005442122,0.000079445854,0.0005220185,0.0027549297,0.0029828271,0.0005193234,0.008904943,0.00035847907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013289745,0.00001936829,0.00003783853,0.00014671643,0.00005048734,0.00003446967,0.00077758665,6.6933154e-8,1.1113158e-7,0.5017262,0.48984212,0.0073517617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021094643,0.000028721082,0.000011880085,0.00041024524,0.00013239175,0.000006444779,0.00020335767,0.00003276437,0.0000016964829,0.3790742,0.61952245,0.00036491506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005948976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016513241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12968034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010619893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014432155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414513469","doi":"10.1080/01639374.2025.2562548","title":"Cataloging Ethics Definitions Revisited: Practitioner Perspectives Five Years Later","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cataloging & Classification Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bibliographical Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Cataloging; Resource Description and Access","score_opus":0.10551369373338743,"score_gpt":0.40415947372963956,"score_spread":0.29864577999625214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414513469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04884026,0.0008234022,0.025284316,0.5128121,0.0026010852,0.0013685555,0.00023276803,0.0012414347,0.4067961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98909223,0.00016611976,0.001425396,0.0023369533,0.000231124,0.00013332689,0.00059725257,0.000014369912,0.006003205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979803,0.00053044764,0.0003903488,0.00043768476,0.00034427518,0.0003169276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997221,0.0011713145,0.00028412155,0.0004532219,0.00077600323,0.000094364674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014877362,0.0001448631,0.00015338496,0.00041998865,0.0015586982,0.00064687716,0.00031177475,0.00024731684,0.0002740721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026257979,0.0001653675,0.000080810605,0.0014072824,0.0004448581,0.0015311069,0.000015951151,0.000995959,0.0005697255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067459673,0.00012996944,0.00046161804,0.000016144319,0.00003296178,0.000002187895,0.1192007,0.0000029299758,0.00032910093,0.857714,0.017921327,0.004182327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002745039,0.000036569614,0.041527588,0.00010489514,0.000082865416,0.0000051540396,0.3000506,0.00007741947,0.000023708968,0.024493925,0.6329786,0.00034416874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013907021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068162446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039773714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015041298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414590834","doi":"10.1002/eahr.60011","title":"Broadening Core Research Ethics Principles: Insights from Research Conducted with Black Communities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Human Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; McGill University; University of Ottawa; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Beneficence; Research ethics; Interpretation (philosophy); Outreach; Respect for persons; Limiting; Transformative learning; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.8500494897726547,"score_gpt":0.6703714055294517,"score_spread":0.17967808424320297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414590834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40558264,0.00031055853,0.00004569775,0.16776037,0.0002508631,0.0010726433,0.000016216643,0.00013908531,0.42482194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242194,0.00052708376,0.00059248257,0.0009129159,0.0005320381,0.0002011225,0.00013780063,0.000041417603,0.07283568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95633334,0.032506548,0.0006408367,0.0006570401,0.008296251,0.0015659904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8846642,0.08730824,0.00013987605,0.0016846852,0.025804622,0.00039839183],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07908871,0.00020723966,0.0003060445,0.0024715269,0.02437221,0.0026828342,0.0025229217,0.0012875692,0.0017084043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04734926,0.0001952786,0.00005330568,0.0091228755,0.016351443,0.0010136518,0.0010234163,0.05105846,0.00050593365],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005682086,0.0001659017,0.0010474246,0.00006569446,0.00004892935,0.000009767894,0.37369034,0.000007047656,0.00043878128,0.6096478,0.014743435,0.0000780555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028744436,0.000108875174,0.0019598308,0.00044699907,0.00000551884,2.8863207e-7,0.40151942,0.00003041402,0.00020053203,0.10327892,0.49201667,0.0001450928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25649235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32611322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5186368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012764287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025910474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414798560","doi":"10.1093/analys/anaf061","title":"Blaming yourself for wronging yourself","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Blame; Moral responsibility; Counterfactual thinking; Motivated reasoning","score_opus":0.02877624108100612,"score_gpt":0.4783858464972945,"score_spread":0.44960960541628836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414798560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068808064,0.00021922757,0.109629974,0.24264309,0.0011599978,0.00038020045,0.000013622272,0.00020834287,0.5769375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568131,0.00001873154,0.0019197827,0.0012427986,0.0001508997,0.00002925239,0.00002021259,0.0000028818952,0.03980232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993642,0.00006634064,0.00014422592,0.00013558836,0.00012307618,0.00016659508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918675,0.000340886,0.000073654635,0.0001374831,0.00022673917,0.00003451129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076698605,0.00004594975,0.00010507471,0.0004261918,0.0007448657,0.00018887258,0.00013747791,0.000044848923,0.00040616357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000893071,0.00004865821,0.00013595271,0.0033426173,0.00004807922,0.00031177586,0.000009581968,0.00008726261,0.000021670101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006428422,0.0001119153,0.030249145,0.000009036634,0.0015385628,3.7120887e-7,0.02291228,0.00026746377,0.00007677259,0.89310384,0.030782726,0.020941462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009541628,0.0000035478968,0.004451995,0.0000049752884,0.0015119975,2.7417173e-8,0.023247888,0.00074563123,0.00006384305,0.0034704413,0.96630514,0.000099106386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038293065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042851744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9355224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007066203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039416822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5788792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414958007","doi":"10.1177/14782103251386648","title":"Judging the institution: Simulated jurisprudence and the governance of professional futures","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Futures in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Western University","keywords":"Deliberation; Corporate governance; Futures studies; Futures contract; Interdependence; Dialogic; Public policy; Scholarship","score_opus":0.010310915028476975,"score_gpt":0.41906470741397284,"score_spread":0.40875379238549586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414958007","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29442275,0.0022306072,0.000027793722,0.62756807,0.0038889144,0.0005320269,0.000003240357,0.000019353489,0.07130723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897706,0.00058920553,0.00007216372,0.0053444062,0.0008509323,0.000043707747,0.000002479381,0.0000021845983,0.0033243492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903965,0.00032201962,0.00021610447,0.00010769347,0.00019648184,0.00011804028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988193,0.00064365467,0.00017445176,0.00017040764,0.00017263605,0.00001958601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009339904,0.00005916821,0.00007580936,0.00009822663,0.0008919078,0.000085642576,0.00024694417,0.000062382096,0.00003812957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029866893,0.000036300586,0.000021422758,0.0012537438,0.0005726285,0.0003323424,0.0000348339,0.00028838392,0.000001778919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024268544,0.000071335395,0.002079914,0.000010980296,0.0000054561015,1.7716605e-8,0.036912456,0.00006207873,0.000010346352,0.92713815,0.009019173,0.0246658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038783177,0.000003789075,0.25430593,0.00011960914,0.00001653574,8.09616e-7,0.05239519,0.00009749308,0.00006629146,0.066752136,0.6257711,0.000083271654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028276779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005995714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.860386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012269091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004279479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.978194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415005235","doi":"10.62889/2025/dyb.1009","title":"Profit, Power, and Pedagogy: The Minnesota READ Act","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Equity and Social Justice in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Legislation; Technocracy; Reading (process); Literacy; Rhetoric; Curriculum; Corporate governance; Intervention (counseling); Citizen journalism","score_opus":0.05006054343760235,"score_gpt":0.4867667103658752,"score_spread":0.43670616692827285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415005235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45626017,0.0009904444,0.00003532906,0.45243314,0.0033376433,0.00016081979,0.000001154827,0.000005142187,0.08677616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921735,0.00090332073,0.00016728358,0.0036515826,0.0007386647,0.0000053905223,9.677436e-7,0.0000025709542,0.0023567115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990514,0.0002660978,0.00028312058,0.00007239148,0.00020333732,0.00012363296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868715,0.0005628541,0.00027755013,0.000049618404,0.0003852621,0.000037554222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022164006,0.00005343203,0.00010314766,0.00014024111,0.0007767395,0.00026363102,0.00014863591,0.00008852189,0.00005283909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021148426,0.000043561562,0.000024861947,0.00044463074,0.00021332465,0.00074740965,0.00004568207,0.0004071482,0.0000012608017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043618194,0.00021351958,0.0058083744,0.00006656071,0.000019928573,5.6429525e-7,0.13285549,4.864799e-7,0.000062812294,0.72299635,0.026123807,0.11180845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001828257,0.000027158083,0.078266725,0.000050776845,0.00012895383,0.0000049473406,0.27404845,0.000002492402,0.000004315634,0.021881424,0.6253346,0.00006732578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001032586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015445475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70111495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012718997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036782385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65250367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415144847","doi":"10.6000/2817-2302.2025.04.07","title":"International Survey about Perceptions of Courts’ Role in Addressing Social Issues through Problem-Solving Courts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Nevada, Reno","keywords":"Attribution; Perception; Economic Justice; Social responsibility; Social issues; Collective responsibility","score_opus":0.04157253043237718,"score_gpt":0.40965758809228225,"score_spread":0.36808505765990507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415144847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07073018,0.000529288,0.004694991,0.048812505,0.004583809,0.0004447068,0.000062060695,0.00005712122,0.87008536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865097,0.00014363465,0.009592963,0.000558872,0.0001649418,0.000021500293,0.00004293168,0.000006145283,0.0029593285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871826,0.00035733223,0.0003291038,0.00015799647,0.00025037187,0.00018695406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993861,0.00013857363,0.00013546152,0.00008184027,0.00024019122,0.00001784558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012314401,0.00007053445,0.00015368979,0.000175345,0.0003558318,0.00016215794,0.00024838123,0.000109069144,0.00033498098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047367907,0.00008156146,0.000032227694,0.0005754418,0.00042930557,0.0009528206,0.000033945314,0.00028805702,0.0000036442639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027417596,0.0002740665,0.31244472,0.000018515839,0.000033384513,7.4155884e-7,0.094948694,0.000062949315,0.00006296316,0.48386976,0.104398526,0.0038582436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043291156,0.0000068348268,0.26741078,0.00016717834,0.000011100551,1.4495217e-7,0.049551655,0.00019179503,0.00003032987,0.04348558,0.63854194,0.00016973924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04452441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018674504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91577953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002609546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049984234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223254","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1871","title":"Reflections on Equity in Higher Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Charter; Equity (law); Racism; Harassment; Ambivalence; Normative","score_opus":0.23436625003309317,"score_gpt":0.5488728815015316,"score_spread":0.3145066314684384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048740607,0.000019714034,0.0000070623537,0.14565006,0.0033919315,0.000054607473,0.0000012779401,0.000017240676,0.8503707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962037,0.000034250173,0.00027063963,0.0074744774,0.00035748156,0.000010549683,0.000001246234,0.0000028317222,0.029811477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992425,0.00018348875,0.00017803315,0.00008028325,0.00017191863,0.0001437906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994914,0.000116924864,0.000076616736,0.000079128746,0.00017932373,0.0000565953],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007314422,0.000042791227,0.00005195021,0.00017899876,0.0031466922,0.00017291846,0.0001267974,0.000056999434,0.0017893075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026009732,0.000042233132,0.000027005131,0.0008071585,0.000056989193,0.0004938708,0.000014136275,0.0005555341,0.00007590889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006040034,0.0001856613,0.00008684064,0.0000012272263,0.00000426625,3.8400097e-7,0.00033359206,0.000006228844,0.000014595116,0.98076737,0.008758116,0.009835693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082708626,0.000009606801,0.0026623863,0.000026359303,0.0000045403585,0.0000013772119,0.0011391053,3.1309304e-7,0.000025304158,0.045973115,0.9500343,0.000040861098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007676606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043691117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96154964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050610525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004096522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415230584","doi":"10.1609/aies.v8i2.36651","title":"Write on Paper, Wrong in Practice: Why LLMs Still Struggle with Writing Clinical Notes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Sociotechnical system; Documentation; Technical writing; Bespoke; Qualitative research; Technical documentation","score_opus":0.122319563470876,"score_gpt":0.4663468857142978,"score_spread":0.3440273222434218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415230584","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22271931,0.000044574066,0.000021384702,0.6512116,0.00029413332,0.00039590767,0.00000667208,0.00003752995,0.12526885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634391,0.0011879641,0.0018247063,0.032848615,0.000096804346,0.000019411948,0.0000010709316,0.00000777125,0.0005745643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983055,0.00015401008,0.0004326841,0.00032255478,0.000539209,0.00024606686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931991,0.0046408004,0.00040923888,0.0001753041,0.0015039792,0.00007155006],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058799526,0.00013513316,0.0002102981,0.00004790479,0.0008196791,0.0003525172,0.00046656246,0.00034069965,0.000041838503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020973237,0.00010080287,0.000082760045,0.00073920866,0.0007261185,0.00080371177,0.00012793619,0.0029603753,0.0000025368854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005731199,0.00021409582,0.021343924,0.00006241337,0.000043069707,1.16218224e-7,0.039782833,0.000001726134,0.00013365582,0.93242353,0.0034084837,0.002528858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024509004,0.0006349462,0.07306677,0.0029758238,0.00023973755,0.000002629941,0.44579718,0.0007175922,0.0006583162,0.09954394,0.37306914,0.0008430072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014415479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003983518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8328796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006806803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013624793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415396814","doi":"10.69569/jip.2025.603","title":"Developing Research Skills in Criminology Students Through Interdisciplinary Approaches","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of interdisciplinary perspectives","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Competence (human resources); Research design; Educational research; Research methodology; Critical thinking; Student engagement","score_opus":0.28596062565517527,"score_gpt":0.5556089831708301,"score_spread":0.2696483575156548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415396814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5639957,0.0051667904,0.0017932587,0.28126743,0.0049806912,0.00068448443,0.0000052007254,0.00001981833,0.14208661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98684806,0.001627262,0.003043075,0.0002631184,0.0010020151,0.00003554935,0.0000021035353,0.000030472293,0.007148352],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99138266,0.0030629083,0.0022704646,0.0007643711,0.0014962194,0.0010234024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930678,0.00248516,0.00117583,0.0004983034,0.0026089249,0.00016395684],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008561816,0.00043643866,0.0009480721,0.003041858,0.0021250478,0.000873696,0.0024584744,0.00049232505,0.00053682894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024195798,0.00040831408,0.0004035761,0.0044801855,0.0022941008,0.003843348,0.0044343695,0.0046991957,0.00006708193],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060156727,0.003997431,0.0058538965,0.000116295785,0.0005081533,0.000117911295,0.71367365,0.000048834667,0.000046634374,0.2595764,0.0101928655,0.0052663754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090831844,0.0005176409,0.05090044,0.0016210846,0.00007720119,0.00006188963,0.7512608,0.000019098545,0.00009303708,0.18744197,0.0068012686,0.00029721655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002116835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007926107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42285237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045519653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005842679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416271814","doi":"10.15294/iccle.v4i3.36552","title":"Repositioning the Nigerian Lawyer Through Mandatory Continuing Legal Education: Developing a Cross-Border Approach to Legal Education","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Redeemer University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Legal profession; Legal research; Legal practice; Legal opinion; Continuing education; Practice of law; Legal realism; International Legal English Certificate","score_opus":0.041423108864517916,"score_gpt":0.4831764797376377,"score_spread":0.44175337087311983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416271814","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37115276,0.0015929433,0.0037900466,0.395068,0.07410585,0.0018953752,0.00003987719,0.00005506988,0.15230009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90824753,0.00023168212,0.006128482,0.037895843,0.015108211,0.00044634132,0.00013436639,0.0000810723,0.031726446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875524,0.0036625124,0.0044369744,0.00087252964,0.0027605812,0.0007150255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858062,0.0017793495,0.005178091,0.0009194712,0.0058551324,0.00046175605],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012253102,0.00057619816,0.0007257163,0.0006172044,0.0048769433,0.0035386323,0.003007618,0.00026540607,0.0020098079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058038877,0.0004733867,0.00071064715,0.0027255553,0.00093330425,0.0060734204,0.00046824175,0.0044497894,0.00009805849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011524103,0.0073649613,0.008185062,0.000060310904,0.0007369615,0.000007977472,0.050804213,0.0009802384,0.00006437874,0.769219,0.09361352,0.06781099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006150974,0.00023530937,0.02048634,0.00028502868,0.00022137983,0.0012280508,0.08558115,0.00004792979,0.000034538316,0.0021139027,0.88861287,0.0005384248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040110056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019596859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7949993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022349628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048006956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416290295","doi":"10.29173/alr2629","title":"History of the Faculty of Law","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.07485331042993329,"score_gpt":0.40361533082796314,"score_spread":0.3287620203980298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416290295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000059035632,0.09360119,0.0000011879115,0.12186075,0.002049953,0.0004447687,0.0000069455673,0.0000025807437,0.7819736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5114853,0.0642755,0.000076206234,0.073923536,0.00009784143,0.00005299978,0.00001322335,0.000012108708,0.3500633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796385,0.0005798461,0.0008037003,0.00018319728,0.00031240482,0.0001569825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725014,0.000860221,0.0007695708,0.0005684218,0.0005109559,0.00004068793],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009901783,0.000120242876,0.00040619407,0.000019577892,0.00022850797,0.00001640314,0.0006125222,0.00009124596,0.0036987292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001853712,0.00008767996,0.0002573425,0.0009751581,0.0011335469,0.00038256482,0.0000834831,0.0003012668,0.00006559561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013605231,0.00011495137,0.000051598196,0.0017134612,0.00004646848,1.8256559e-8,0.00314207,7.2173776e-8,0.000009106878,0.87132585,0.12163403,0.0019610275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065028085,0.000008133384,0.00009906927,0.0038058872,0.00030033686,2.2448735e-7,0.00013353347,6.8359157e-7,0.000040754276,0.001482345,0.9939868,0.00007721902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18538946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037764683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8723528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025261196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027010124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99721205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416401998","doi":"10.54660/ijsser.2022.1.5.22-40","title":"A Conceptual Framework for Ethical Practice and Credential Recognition of Foreign-Trained Lawyers in the United States","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Science Exceptional Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credential; Operationalization; Legal profession; Credentialing; Conceptual framework; Legal ethics; Certification; Accreditation","score_opus":0.2330441217818144,"score_gpt":0.555277754144536,"score_spread":0.3222336323627215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416401998","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40631372,0.00014150122,0.0036055131,0.56973726,0.0033584044,0.0011264267,0.00046807388,0.000006969065,0.015242119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99192834,0.0003302677,0.002250697,0.0034486752,0.0017966145,0.00007376877,0.000058434616,0.000009797524,0.00010341174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98659205,0.0032927704,0.0010634927,0.0003136863,0.008206878,0.00053113647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724089,0.014252605,0.001184025,0.000092643146,0.011904714,0.00015710872],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045151815,0.00012880472,0.00022412819,0.001559753,0.0030458313,0.0007828281,0.00190399,0.0001973876,0.0022546155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03802093,0.000118175514,0.00015123715,0.0047125104,0.006604705,0.0018076606,0.00029780352,0.0039653447,0.000004489057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011681223,0.0006512493,0.00013741582,0.0000065161853,0.00006998336,0.000010577225,0.15599895,0.00009204623,0.00028023336,0.833452,0.0041800127,0.003952897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093847734,0.00060187024,0.0022973383,0.000048131813,0.000029116247,0.000062662155,0.55682665,0.00022823781,0.000023178443,0.2380171,0.20079973,0.0001274866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016779648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006519149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5954349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010687871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006936242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416462446","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5763102","title":"&lt;p&gt;The Ethics We Learn Together: Teaching AI and Moral Formation in a Law School Classroom&lt;/p&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social engineering (security); Interpretation (philosophy); Order (exchange); Institution; Social order; Task (project management); Social practice; Metis","score_opus":0.03900245386203895,"score_gpt":0.3764222498004316,"score_spread":0.33741979593839266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416462446","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022977564,0.007960421,0.01665311,0.8146454,0.0021792678,0.00094640383,0.000014097605,0.00012075353,0.13450295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649645,0.016353296,0.00030459487,0.0042720987,0.0009617301,0.00004557825,0.000017217753,0.000020102842,0.013060875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948307,0.0020939512,0.00064369047,0.00029583738,0.00070738746,0.0014284041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980186,0.0006422423,0.00056976086,0.0002735371,0.00037456214,0.000121281104],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014818023,0.00023369881,0.00026546366,0.00032072896,0.0022095568,0.001137919,0.00063731516,0.00062083267,0.000087538785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003112457,0.00020683029,0.00012023366,0.0004659739,0.00027862718,0.0013191917,0.00018233956,0.027196895,0.000026775266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002263295,0.00005745685,0.00016190558,0.000027014756,0.000059650854,0.0000010510503,0.022743711,0.00012437902,0.000031947493,0.95934343,0.0012067626,0.016220082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027612498,0.00003539487,0.000080862184,0.00017220498,0.0000500251,0.000048649326,0.012659325,0.00035404356,0.000004191345,0.5947194,0.39138952,0.00021025228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039611594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14821903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9419869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027116886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020956844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416892521","doi":"10.1007/s11115-025-00965-3","title":"The Impact of Social Identity on Legal Attitudes: Insights from the U.S., India, and Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Organization Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collectivism; Legislation; Individualism; Identity (music); Social identity theory; Perception; Cultural identity","score_opus":0.01936521368011775,"score_gpt":0.3702774484286167,"score_spread":0.350912234748499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416892521","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088121764,0.017729132,0.00011814099,0.8400069,0.0011446854,0.0009592024,0.000038956325,0.000047303514,0.051833943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850184,0.008330817,0.0000044420453,0.0057950947,0.000110285626,0.0000067534543,0.000029557868,0.000003762678,0.0007009041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903786,0.00034158432,0.00021043682,0.00008809907,0.00023595052,0.00008605293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870664,0.00053563365,0.00018288368,0.00013007245,0.0004139586,0.00003082069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042144462,0.00005400113,0.000097182005,0.000023328816,0.0012679687,0.0003821805,0.0002597552,0.00003022954,0.00044967153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044015097,0.000031188974,0.000021019428,0.0016763452,0.00011118184,0.00056000566,0.000032916454,0.0001436379,0.00000563724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.9783343e-7,0.000030776537,0.031238785,0.000027453772,0.000050016155,7.3061315e-8,0.0011223624,1.1558907e-7,0.0000026519397,0.83945227,0.1247573,0.0033176087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038151968,0.0000024162987,0.31385058,0.00005360824,0.000018912555,7.150101e-8,0.0005934989,3.6645042e-7,0.0000026141126,0.00051970314,0.6848851,0.000034967652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4952736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53437746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8968966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014018129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043103495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9752318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416988549","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2025.2585423","title":"Better law for a better world: new approaches to law practice and education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Practice of law; Legal education; Legal practice; Legal profession; Black letter law","score_opus":0.12523694500336355,"score_gpt":0.4020189543921985,"score_spread":0.2767820093888349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416988549","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010286222,0.00005973897,0.00035773515,0.5109047,0.00028786244,0.00035923353,0.000001020373,0.000027306562,0.48697373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4556934,0.0000026311254,0.015962685,0.32835335,0.0013572869,0.00026884422,0.000011029274,0.000015329015,0.19833544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990873,0.00024862873,0.0001525715,0.0001844335,0.00013972445,0.00018738702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889916,0.00064093847,0.0000745896,0.00023234465,0.00007996115,0.00007301894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011246705,0.0000839536,0.000083501545,0.000045657223,0.0008501066,0.00048646424,0.00019871928,0.000058341902,0.0001846854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034026848,0.00006651657,0.000028788001,0.00045488504,0.00020715792,0.0008438498,0.000035981004,0.0002537368,0.000058220685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015386486,0.000084700194,0.000044961173,0.0000041687044,0.000018207633,2.3246978e-8,0.0136671,4.530142e-7,0.000009058291,0.8282045,0.14585872,0.0120927375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100129,0.0000069266384,0.000096734686,0.000010354312,0.000054195323,3.6301594e-7,0.004180798,0.0000025794457,0.000048476013,0.09121131,0.90420943,0.000078715646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029893598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025289405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7583507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071148796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004362439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99249655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416993015","doi":"10.65393/elwy7299","title":"PUBLIC LEGAL EDUCATION: A KEY TO JUSTICE FOR ALL","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Key (lock); Bridge (graph theory); Legal research; Legal profession; Public policy","score_opus":0.09832075091890358,"score_gpt":0.4556871435625759,"score_spread":0.3573663926436723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416993015","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019946416,0.11062625,0.0009802864,0.7462012,0.011707854,0.0013627564,0.00002105407,0.000010371376,0.12889074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25454682,0.1756945,0.013911952,0.44375184,0.00961601,0.00033797236,0.000029477873,0.00007470096,0.10203672],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953637,0.0007720909,0.0021349443,0.000332952,0.000772057,0.000624259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910625,0.0010565642,0.0018087138,0.000417755,0.0048563075,0.00079813856],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062417914,0.0003047444,0.00078867056,0.00079137774,0.00087243476,0.0016304018,0.0012353591,0.0001794951,0.001660188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02266776,0.00029303305,0.00052397605,0.0041296287,0.00017310314,0.0037889597,0.000061386425,0.0012093189,0.00022594014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025921989,0.00040421693,0.000018889601,0.0022986745,0.00015651686,0.000009513214,0.003053732,6.6699425e-7,0.000004581202,0.34117904,0.51930475,0.13354349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028734753,0.0002128578,0.000059964663,0.0077841533,0.0011007275,0.00013637295,0.0037561196,8.5200514e-7,0.0000070339024,0.0014283381,0.98496133,0.0002648801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032582862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032159314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46565658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006365847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041638397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417154677","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13759-6","title":"Perceptions of primary care patients attending a legal health clinic: a qualitative descriptive study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Health Services Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing research; Thematic analysis; Health administration; Qualitative research; Public health; Health informatics; Legal psychology; Perception; Descriptive research","score_opus":0.22541043466080962,"score_gpt":0.609553108233327,"score_spread":0.38414267357251736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417154677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9155661,0.00056958344,0.00013130684,0.014271617,0.0006814397,0.003828981,0.000113334725,0.00006850431,0.064769134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928119,0.00016134074,0.0012638299,0.001997356,0.000098743374,0.000214663,0.00010939242,0.00001138261,0.0033313509],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98854744,0.008298407,0.000844346,0.00039831497,0.0012261736,0.0006853375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945008,0.0018900285,0.00036287415,0.00033598908,0.0026424767,0.00026779893],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010030636,0.000113444774,0.00034617088,0.00070601254,0.002687071,0.000194981,0.00048750633,0.00007951394,0.00023258782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004999139,0.00011348364,0.000060783106,0.0032558981,0.00026995453,0.0007913076,0.00015605259,0.00082959543,0.00008339106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071860464,0.0009841636,0.13478805,0.0010477927,0.000020490703,1.2375595e-7,0.8508595,6.812187e-7,0.00000112903,0.0066156634,0.000987219,0.0046233274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041005042,0.00037244312,0.25176805,0.00021033855,0.0000031719403,2.5263688e-8,0.7182174,0.0000035375706,3.112226e-7,0.0001434355,0.028816702,0.000054549706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16053325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09597826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13264212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022315786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019616451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417172372","doi":"10.31273/wpqtm024","title":"&lt;b&gt;In the Seminar Space: Navigating Graduate Teaching in Undergraduate Legal &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;Education&lt;/b&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of PGR Pedagogic Practice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Warwick","keywords":"Dialogic; Foregrounding; Agency (philosophy); Transformative learning; Rigour; Identity (music); Negotiation; Reflective practice; Participatory action research","score_opus":0.06517370578867077,"score_gpt":0.43617647776491925,"score_spread":0.3710027719762485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417172372","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14711328,0.0083037475,0.00056839467,0.6019901,0.008644749,0.0012795057,0.000020964824,0.00006269736,0.23201656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95691687,0.0074981293,0.0064054546,0.01053617,0.0031287335,0.000087531655,0.00002754001,0.00008832142,0.0153112775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780583,0.010523858,0.0045659184,0.0011886326,0.0038355642,0.00182773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97238004,0.015328964,0.007821934,0.0012457906,0.0026517066,0.0005715766],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03552546,0.0010645983,0.0013863071,0.001563377,0.0036229978,0.0040552355,0.0028120738,0.0007478189,0.00038936708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05877551,0.0009549621,0.0006628355,0.0075456994,0.0007847584,0.014006042,0.0003425823,0.010143993,0.00020379634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067223236,0.0068858177,0.0010113241,0.00029212175,0.00055508746,0.0004829888,0.15306893,0.00096994016,0.00760489,0.64760745,0.14239581,0.038453426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015900261,0.00036242825,0.0036215512,0.0017151607,0.0008222686,0.00081764854,0.11173052,0.00051017344,0.00006152589,0.01181773,0.8660547,0.0008962752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023071514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006605398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80980355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024834366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020171631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417433484","doi":"10.3138/9781049805146","title":"Looking Forward by Looking Back","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Legal history; Legal education; Scholarship; Legal profession; Legal realism; Legal research; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.023872772871287598,"score_gpt":0.285494803317581,"score_spread":0.2616220304462934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417433484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018717215,0.0018743224,0.0008906906,0.00089169154,0.0015223271,0.0007346723,0.00022871977,0.000057083864,0.99378175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015989834,0.0016495574,0.0007292191,0.0002931007,0.00025876422,7.9240937e-7,0.00007920824,0.000022178996,0.9953682],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970513,0.00043308822,0.0005178147,0.000691933,0.0007630886,0.00054280617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644125,0.00062620145,0.0011910114,0.00062345254,0.000866784,0.0002513342],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067591533,0.00042281393,0.00064118864,0.000075639575,0.0014385739,0.00023043973,0.0014204743,0.0007663252,0.0064938404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017697626,0.0005988083,0.00036261237,0.000019646677,0.00093433255,0.0012817463,0.0004413929,0.0008325253,0.000048903115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014743516,0.00017617711,0.000024027946,0.00041778304,0.0006386516,0.000006465062,0.11520977,0.000006965013,0.00006317512,0.21495214,0.6399848,0.028372616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005612877,0.000053532673,0.00000927958,0.0005159758,0.00045091406,5.118502e-7,0.0068529113,0.00003110255,0.00009303161,0.00033389297,0.99059707,0.0005004714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55478346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07858084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4762026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017670934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004073065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417491987","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v32i3.1798","title":"Sustaining Legal Clinics Through Summer: A Strategic Response to Rural Legal Advice Deserts in the Southwest of England","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rurality; Legal advice; Intervention (counseling); Population; Face (sociological concept); Legal service; Legislature; Rural area; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.08774606629170167,"score_gpt":0.5291681681221226,"score_spread":0.44142210183042097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417491987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77331406,0.00011013839,0.00020264264,0.1817164,0.0070805172,0.00024131227,0.000008797211,0.000011445333,0.03731472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867811,0.000098594246,0.0016549538,0.007509885,0.0017354116,0.000014191528,0.000011347064,0.000008693507,0.002185808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994608,0.0018539927,0.002135259,0.00018920751,0.00097312784,0.00024044089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99027014,0.0052296002,0.0012184859,0.00022799951,0.0029332414,0.00012051539],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010859904,0.00013874727,0.0003363192,0.00045889537,0.00019304811,0.0005330804,0.0011115266,0.00017371365,0.000118125594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018997358,0.00011345821,0.00022558135,0.0010963421,0.00022644349,0.0018912102,0.000051613104,0.0011445816,0.000014415732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005465213,0.0027771234,0.054633867,0.000018551887,0.00026617918,0.000033998393,0.03786156,0.00024325952,0.00005815728,0.85583955,0.012546755,0.030255768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011412075,0.00023789545,0.05696998,0.00020529247,0.000052634496,0.000023887149,0.090125196,0.000023721319,0.000015268814,0.006877022,0.8441962,0.00013168858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010521113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040307455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84896255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023223944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014809014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99606794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W44394366","doi":"","title":"Dealing with Sensitive Issues in Morality and Law.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.031817085643217696,"score_gpt":0.3423433413980397,"score_spread":0.31052625575482196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W44394366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71610427,0.000036713805,0.000056378547,0.046843473,0.000038603033,0.0000985223,0.0000017015979,0.000028361494,0.23679195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954724,0.00018018066,0.0012072955,0.00085670594,0.00014529024,0.0000054695174,0.0000032698201,0.000004593723,0.002124806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948007,0.00008331703,0.000094558985,0.00011154355,0.00007891022,0.00015162354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996387,0.000111087684,0.000046065234,0.0000739407,0.00007404996,0.000056165536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005000912,0.000034147677,0.00007518645,0.000041014508,0.0001799387,0.00009092187,0.00004202363,0.000042560518,0.00006880818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001643844,0.00004646832,0.00000909062,0.00030490407,0.000111943096,0.00037243922,0.0000071164054,0.00014915782,0.00001527267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016178454,0.0000354746,0.04113506,0.000007643855,0.0000055437604,0.00003342427,0.020066055,0.00001798351,0.000048644688,0.9366305,0.00009872418,0.0019047996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008074027,0.00008411373,0.15927964,0.00022764536,0.00004315056,0.00014791399,0.05241902,0.00036541012,0.00040960088,0.1291357,0.65647376,0.0006066194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02599018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027537802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80749476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084184794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000960577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W46769426","doi":"10.32920/22341337","title":"The E-Team Project: A Teamwork Approach to Clinical Legal Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Notice; Legal education; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Passion; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.13923714968036857,"score_gpt":0.5193572630499719,"score_spread":0.3801201133696033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W46769426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005178553,0.000008542799,0.00017771497,0.13336205,0.0023341859,0.00050514267,6.7139473e-7,0.00021050681,0.85822266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49595997,0.00009139203,0.00412555,0.0076652057,0.0027894175,0.00040891353,0.00001806598,0.000013171795,0.48892832],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875265,0.00030990288,0.0002522143,0.00017479534,0.00028274514,0.00022769312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987204,0.00068033993,0.00006480633,0.00021270238,0.0002270049,0.00009476726],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031147073,0.0000517276,0.00005948433,0.00008791328,0.0012741435,0.00053033244,0.00028734616,0.00006403559,0.00006708186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003958006,0.00003614011,0.000042140484,0.0024008097,0.00011817827,0.00039540802,0.000035202163,0.00026644694,0.0012677473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002993785,0.00009497625,0.0006026186,6.131749e-7,0.000003554947,1.5030018e-8,0.004989363,7.674835e-7,4.7231575e-7,0.43328896,0.54005194,0.020963715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029969646,0.000010924994,0.003233102,0.0000018714036,0.0000036120578,3.3050168e-7,0.053242687,0.000024513396,0.000001007867,0.0011750223,0.94221944,0.00005750838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006899632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013223507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49078143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053956574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039534476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W46835410","doi":"10.1007/978-1-137-29556-9","title":"Discourses of trust","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Public relations; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Law","score_opus":0.047358559975365117,"score_gpt":0.39918314834271756,"score_spread":0.3518245883673524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W46835410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015046041,0.000045825036,0.000015075396,0.028861875,0.0005935641,0.00013180685,0.0000064708215,0.00002432801,0.970306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012076265,0.000055269982,0.00026350244,0.00040771713,0.00046203623,0.0000079356,0.000022271624,0.0000065535755,0.99756706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994326,0.000034839584,0.00015379889,0.00007625784,0.00022097718,0.00008150504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992392,0.00017779214,0.00018071303,0.00012107905,0.00024149293,0.000039704588],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020061382,0.000054347824,0.00009783414,0.00007089016,0.00012211037,0.00007100499,0.00015294275,0.00012971635,0.03565484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031875234,0.000047037884,0.00003903677,0.000093923765,0.00021681565,0.0003255844,0.00001067222,0.00019671382,0.0007040076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.6171289e-7,0.000009240681,0.0000066819157,0.0000030100432,0.0000052229025,2.567232e-8,0.0018323363,2.141626e-8,3.3717774e-7,0.5053171,0.49157897,0.0012469426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016511754,0.0000041736766,0.000024137533,0.000011249584,0.000012356212,6.191793e-8,0.0028140042,2.1908424e-7,0.000002812675,0.017835053,0.97922033,0.000059065518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049181036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010419694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4876414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062995365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034570566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9652267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W468432831","doi":"","title":"LibGuides. On The Web: Where to Find Canadian Case Law. British Columbia.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.04358089228278778,"score_gpt":0.3252407205573323,"score_spread":0.2816598282745445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W468432831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013715189,0.00012922264,3.877086e-7,0.2966166,0.0023604208,0.00074120105,0.0002999903,0.00007119882,0.69840944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021130195,0.00032518938,0.00019595106,0.094566055,0.0019340673,0.00020101652,0.00007270663,0.00004175827,0.8815331],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789494,0.0003157394,0.00036662194,0.00037442616,0.00047762235,0.00057063176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972252,0.00090003485,0.0001534887,0.00046320882,0.00065468944,0.0006033246],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010118092,0.00015352305,0.00020236574,0.00010464782,0.002900991,0.0067073624,0.00062352425,0.00043801952,0.11647874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021998417,0.00018269393,0.00008127829,0.00085622346,0.00024123077,0.0005024814,0.000039969258,0.00095966685,0.0035661603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.667378e-7,0.000019812198,0.000033208522,0.000006096856,0.00002001357,0.00010510645,0.0019662525,3.5697278e-7,1.578217e-7,0.04777217,0.945792,0.0042845365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039995724,0.00001854896,0.00007711108,0.00007758319,0.000017607534,0.00006510517,0.00803497,0.0000013604882,2.1116003e-7,0.0007219308,0.9906768,0.00026874428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99966574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20205055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005343213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009978665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47619465","doi":"","title":"Is the Canadian legal profession at risk? An analysis of lawyer victimization across Canada.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal profession; Law; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.022044396612366426,"score_gpt":0.3057240661619168,"score_spread":0.2836796695495504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W47619465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8583525,0.00003294945,0.000009768282,0.003615566,0.0013967259,0.00041687218,0.0007412082,0.000033385917,0.13540101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8920861,0.000089782494,0.000023351759,0.00039693725,0.00006590831,0.0000018636986,0.0019743915,0.000014778395,0.10534691],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981437,0.00046781063,0.00023449586,0.00031979205,0.0005029832,0.0003312395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769396,0.00012451265,0.0006112364,0.00039474043,0.00092321803,0.00025235885],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004751291,0.00016985484,0.00023422707,0.00044134326,0.003119662,0.00011349023,0.00058739696,0.00036765626,0.0024092712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020652055,0.00016541852,0.0001184558,0.0037345758,0.0001274463,0.0008121472,0.000023345627,0.00053814275,0.000013103545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001487234,0.00010817041,0.8981673,0.000024071403,0.00090105383,0.000014360169,0.027450992,0.00021385103,6.7144754e-7,0.014178216,0.05735873,0.0014338207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000883254,0.000007818583,0.033540662,0.000010874183,0.00074143446,4.743035e-10,0.2565685,0.00007322756,0.000059044996,0.00001450594,0.70872927,0.00016632323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99936396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8646267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013765757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008280681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W51903142","doi":"10.29173/alr334","title":"Will the Law Society of Alberta Celebrate its Bicentenary?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Power (physics); Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.058426339906465896,"score_gpt":0.35319823217245583,"score_spread":0.29477189226598993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W51903142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063691917,0.017932132,0.0000027005049,0.30936998,0.00033752582,0.0005355805,0.000002641145,0.00001466189,0.67116785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49271676,0.24768224,0.00024866842,0.15654925,0.00044555584,0.000117119045,0.000037359638,0.000032062086,0.10217098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985648,0.00032364647,0.00038818253,0.00017664448,0.00030674384,0.00023999179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780405,0.001165828,0.0002806271,0.0003475763,0.00031883284,0.000083076106],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007015167,0.000112055575,0.00022897875,0.000006519164,0.0010008079,0.00004036342,0.00039460522,0.00006340845,0.002372043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000638786,0.00007649822,0.0001862127,0.0007427192,0.0005188201,0.0011021819,0.000038097263,0.00024502818,0.00034243523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010484434,0.000063979,0.000079805766,0.00015496924,0.000029216022,1.7595691e-7,0.004844967,1.724377e-7,0.000009472199,0.91178614,0.08282418,0.0002058593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006590402,0.000009466577,0.00003511806,0.00026850734,0.00004868581,0.0000055467003,0.0002334149,0.0000032116745,0.000034945693,0.0003014022,0.99889416,0.00009964416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17457464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064552695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034303805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040371716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W5293378","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1192","title":"When Law Reform Is Not Enough: A Case Study on Social Change and the Role that Lawyers and Legal Clinics Ought to Play","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal College of Anaesthetists","keywords":"Grassroots; Law reform; Political science; Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Scholarship; Injustice; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Social movement; Politics","score_opus":0.14543805735670856,"score_gpt":0.44527065231704566,"score_spread":0.2998325949603371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W5293378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54632497,0.000031254513,0.0000016312547,0.36887044,0.00024452005,0.00020929752,0.000012506133,0.000007900321,0.08429746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94961965,0.00004000486,0.000029354062,0.045103848,0.0046000816,0.000007702023,3.3173217e-7,0.0000082701645,0.00059076044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986338,0.00041989327,0.00028166745,0.000112442154,0.0003470758,0.00020510067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906594,0.00028097694,0.00030301098,0.000059175796,0.0001592165,0.00013165965],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021518455,0.00010166043,0.00024171208,0.00007143183,0.0022381314,0.00048201284,0.00011204315,0.000105173436,0.000013327496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017101213,0.0000712068,0.00005928933,0.00014049289,0.00046895628,0.0006854302,0.00004410491,0.00041414268,0.000002575888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082295235,0.00006719915,0.000060536877,0.0000020249074,0.000028602017,0.000007759979,0.36612603,8.416185e-9,0.0000011269258,0.62734836,0.00047702892,0.005799047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012157833,0.00019701314,0.001041423,0.000005442792,0.000056909117,0.00006305325,0.123469196,0.0000013533905,0.000003909484,0.005200253,0.8686431,0.00010256837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11614934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023244675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8681661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009343118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002148322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54712862","doi":"","title":"Information and information seeking of novice versus expert lawyers: how experts add value","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Review of Information Behaviour Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Psychology; Information seeking; Computer science; Information retrieval; Machine learning","score_opus":0.09843256750236813,"score_gpt":0.4607631064108265,"score_spread":0.3623305389084584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W54712862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081573,0.01531345,0.0017522671,0.17581029,0.0016358417,0.006947986,0.0001784168,0.00030178644,0.71648693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7573769,0.22113176,0.008040221,0.009982902,0.00046662305,0.00037499485,0.0013137988,0.000024386816,0.0012884202],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969144,0.0003376862,0.00093013875,0.0000634177,0.0014612327,0.00029313346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673015,0.00037232952,0.0005498527,0.0002828114,0.0018898133,0.00017503674],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003513952,0.000117721,0.00022745089,0.00051130325,0.00042483752,0.00038551234,0.0003193955,0.00013390472,0.0020407368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030675225,0.00011372946,0.000063460684,0.0015978988,0.00021152598,0.027901884,0.000048616082,0.00034982475,0.00016187812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009908801,0.000044816956,0.0002583964,0.0010512094,0.00001722009,6.751442e-8,0.07137132,0.0000044142284,0.000010624551,0.038031626,0.077294774,0.81181645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000565351,0.000078318844,0.0008224475,0.0009247055,0.000014903268,0.0000017997968,0.019216072,0.000041346102,0.00009590667,0.0000347165,0.9780884,0.00011606305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070385546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000094549905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9007936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015395257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014383132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54969692","doi":"10.53300/001c.6741","title":"Turning gambling silver into tax gold?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revenue Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Publicity; Tax law; Tax avoidance; Accounts payable; Value-added tax; Indirect tax; Order (exchange); Economics; Advertising; Law and economics; Tax reform; Business; Public economics; Law; Marketing; Finance; Political science; Payment; Medicine","score_opus":0.04521173606552628,"score_gpt":0.38093202772146434,"score_spread":0.3357202916559381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W54969692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43622294,0.001074786,0.00059934775,0.17485276,0.0050042667,0.00033012364,0.0000053196145,0.00005070841,0.38185978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880202,0.00010503763,0.0026244074,0.0012018937,0.0016628096,0.0000054937314,0.0000010181758,0.000007106051,0.006372034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991549,0.000183962,0.00017544442,0.00006789478,0.00023578918,0.00018199747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992448,0.00013902735,0.00017701524,0.00007351494,0.0002421948,0.00012343763],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080399966,0.000047226375,0.00006462286,0.00004525458,0.0010144584,0.00057511596,0.00015095448,0.000052420866,0.0017887698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007325175,0.000045673158,0.0000410368,0.00028181894,0.00007928252,0.001242096,0.000012193986,0.00060552504,0.00068238523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071293243,0.00014924663,0.003356686,0.000016891658,0.00007132072,0.000019149735,0.11685794,0.000079805475,0.006505888,0.43369073,0.27770567,0.16153958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006870029,0.0000062889726,0.0005993216,0.000028391116,0.0000067842466,0.000017654842,0.0034732425,0.000008754454,0.00003572133,0.016783109,0.9789071,0.000064938526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014061174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034737692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70120144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009963603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027885032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55958263","doi":"","title":"Court Technology in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020550732950740266,"score_gpt":0.3451081907792258,"score_spread":0.3245574578284855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55958263","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09202796,0.0000064448327,0.000037032743,0.5193535,0.00021209764,0.00003357533,2.3096786e-7,0.000016736807,0.38831237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995682,0.0000059220242,0.0005021952,0.0020203453,0.000024362462,0.000004203319,3.6988578e-7,8.746402e-7,0.0017597534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997297,0.000009403594,0.000053733642,0.00003815966,0.00007516665,0.000093846356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998644,0.000024264738,0.000014005122,0.00004004995,0.000036944468,0.000020328018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012162163,0.000014314534,0.000021042399,0.00005406207,0.00008302467,0.000013834898,0.00006264509,0.000019841415,0.00064680434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028906812,0.000014239785,0.0000022726258,0.000630782,0.000028672164,0.00012312211,0.0000036599772,0.00009432931,0.000034891586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.0742279e-7,0.000009768965,0.010558458,1.5532095e-7,4.9246563e-7,0.0000011097155,0.00073315663,0.00000799414,0.000007026506,0.9836416,0.0043033133,0.00073667185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076044766,0.0000016427516,0.0042146165,0.0000014088589,4.1725673e-7,3.9868422e-7,0.03698925,6.842624e-7,0.000080031634,0.027404577,0.9311973,0.000033617587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99987113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009938695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011186931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99441874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W560225930","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2758","title":"Law Reform for Dummies (3rd Edition)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Law reform; Law; Political science; Focus (optics); Sociology; Public law; Work (physics); Legal profession; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04183578923180889,"score_gpt":0.36268053715360815,"score_spread":0.3208447479217993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W560225930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009811119,0.000022396482,0.003041593,0.08064131,0.0019534337,0.00009466316,0.0000059741524,0.00003858738,0.9141039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808914,0.00003587587,0.00471142,0.005319494,0.004116748,0.000019444331,0.000011135546,0.000011075826,0.004883372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989412,0.00013500165,0.00024759868,0.00010535548,0.00030632547,0.0002645481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988038,0.00025362655,0.00020459761,0.00011516423,0.0004671012,0.00015571526],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016313104,0.00007461936,0.00009856647,0.000041246312,0.0028026362,0.00057779095,0.00021213715,0.000083075276,0.00098722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004798589,0.00006605808,0.00007720055,0.00015100112,0.00020764479,0.0014530813,0.000011564294,0.0003942727,0.00015138318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009033644,0.000046190355,0.00001380993,0.000003816842,0.000011656466,3.3624497e-7,0.0016479322,0.0000021202845,0.000026667618,0.982226,0.0143002365,0.0017122048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017552737,0.00003164997,0.000034622444,0.000010534574,0.000011645967,0.0000104575765,0.0017224208,0.000008750111,0.00007280513,0.27780366,0.7200448,0.00007317225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044927545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25190997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9807933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017778891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002283985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W562467954","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1124","title":"Book Notes: Negotiating Justice: Progressive Lawyering Low-Income Clients, and the Quest for Social Change, by Corey S. Shdaimah","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Social justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.037982797154296005,"score_gpt":0.3834031824197955,"score_spread":0.34542038526549945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W562467954","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017548874,0.017327664,0.0022219892,0.5247429,0.01656951,0.0038977212,0.0001727734,0.00028710495,0.41723144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847341,0.0003539611,0.00089838036,0.008882494,0.0041680103,0.0001165165,0.000010968885,0.00002294464,0.0008126047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985832,0.0002005769,0.00031897525,0.00016861554,0.00035114665,0.0003774753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980069,0.00083322654,0.00049058563,0.00009480817,0.0004244023,0.00015009467],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016786692,0.00012481393,0.00016260997,0.00003763444,0.0049897106,0.0012146059,0.00027114036,0.00013521912,0.00031691714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013432788,0.00009618124,0.000066030385,0.00016736709,0.0005903988,0.0015121783,0.0000404845,0.0010390105,0.000009969348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005094065,0.000077012286,0.00023704232,0.00002249239,0.000029114162,0.0000017813838,0.01824576,8.774109e-7,0.0000761251,0.9662409,0.012417347,0.0026006044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015439024,0.000046743684,0.00038635943,0.00006085781,0.00015753147,0.00004177027,0.006668224,0.00031078525,0.00004720193,0.010264856,0.9801974,0.0002743246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013698159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023923868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056763893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025772495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W57287063","doi":"10.29173/alr336","title":"Who is Afraid of the Big Bad Social Constructionists? Or Shedding Light on the Unpardonable Whiteness of the Canadian Legal Profession","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alzheimer Society of Canada; The Scarborough Hospital; Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Diversity (politics); Statutory law; Equity (law); Political science; Law; Population; Order (exchange); Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.052848922560771984,"score_gpt":0.34758343962224064,"score_spread":0.29473451706146864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W57287063","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010923242,0.00066618796,2.7693025e-7,0.5573277,0.0011000024,0.0006878089,0.000009019694,0.000004634489,0.42928118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95492166,0.0011892299,0.00000902286,0.017426126,0.00019059463,0.000040450686,0.0000014917589,0.000008293755,0.02621314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983704,0.0005963515,0.00033182875,0.00012803401,0.000382578,0.00019078303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852496,0.0004343424,0.00037031202,0.00031699,0.00030427665,0.00004912864],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007374167,0.000090228656,0.00019574548,0.000020960739,0.0034708073,0.000057200632,0.00047767407,0.00007811304,0.0011328444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001187203,0.00004148238,0.000119740325,0.001189467,0.000660398,0.00022364712,0.000036339272,0.00029827765,0.000021141039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034111097,0.000026358483,0.001097283,0.00010915786,0.000019856201,1.4423723e-7,0.00694465,1.849247e-7,0.000008957277,0.9287898,0.06177961,0.0012206017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000477426,0.000005300697,0.0010760439,0.0007454985,0.00003702889,0.000004369959,0.0007201084,5.74801e-7,0.00020409534,0.0002825899,0.99681395,0.000062718405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.556288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78743064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9439984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012047406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037740467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W57516122","doi":"10.29173/alr35","title":"Training Lawyers, Cultivating Citizens, and Re-Enchanting the Legal Professional","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Sociology; Legal profession; Citizenship; Law; Incentive; Meaning (existential); Public value; Rubric; Practice of law; Public service; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.07065397470094821,"score_gpt":0.3997925408408025,"score_spread":0.3291385661398543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W57516122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002553124,0.0031960832,0.000021042135,0.27028483,0.0004774025,0.00036188483,6.422882e-7,0.00002665327,0.7230783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9338256,0.0029917595,0.0006664198,0.047975842,0.0006329613,0.00006528158,0.000011540645,0.000013441519,0.0138171315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986031,0.00055171095,0.00025730915,0.00015759339,0.00022302629,0.00020725666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757373,0.0019206031,0.00019188724,0.0001421716,0.000109104985,0.000062478146],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024852692,0.00007996329,0.00014658921,0.0000122904285,0.0014573785,0.00016940077,0.00015721611,0.00004127281,0.0004802147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005073904,0.00005400698,0.00003821971,0.00032762572,0.00019342129,0.00050484395,0.000034074692,0.00029880763,0.000040394374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.6321188e-7,0.000007672945,0.00014884741,0.00008989867,0.0000062009212,9.816961e-8,0.00728477,5.140826e-8,0.000010332729,0.9638546,0.009033683,0.019563355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046345125,0.0000046426244,0.00009563547,0.00094016857,0.000021230879,0.0000027251217,0.002594666,0.000010862233,0.000002957622,0.0007630197,0.9954349,0.000082860985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015557752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009365649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015699941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020546227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W57941468","doi":"","title":"Recent publications by law reform bodies worldwide","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law reform; Political science; Law; English law; Common law; Public administration","score_opus":0.023589136248758004,"score_gpt":0.35273743448617906,"score_spread":0.32914829823742103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W57941468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009975241,0.0017056991,0.0003258086,0.4785993,0.00023348024,0.000075514065,0.0000015370532,0.000058777267,0.51800233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9171372,0.01883027,0.00014019106,0.005036821,0.0005736229,0.00000808767,0.000016841312,0.00000806168,0.058248874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979465,0.00012718354,0.00024580525,0.00011650898,0.00032027866,0.0012437161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913955,0.000056966528,0.00018333431,0.00013247995,0.0003728645,0.000114808405],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024091324,0.00007657788,0.00007842859,0.00010206316,0.0018025152,0.00040496414,0.0002920073,0.00005883965,0.00045011914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043407184,0.00007010236,0.000043995857,0.0005619131,0.00009490862,0.0013160661,0.0000069521657,0.0017981986,0.00009900875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004481016,0.000082884144,0.000060924416,1.5123251e-7,0.000016207545,6.289095e-8,0.0016577635,2.7783483e-7,0.000021682887,0.9299609,0.015722847,0.052471835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000832462,0.000035440116,0.00015227094,0.000002020968,0.000007957391,0.000011528525,0.0067079323,6.451543e-7,0.000013168862,0.24476488,0.74815136,0.00006952963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002188508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064084105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022752667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004921576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W587819908","doi":"","title":"Does recent empirical research shed new light on Australia's legal aid scheme?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scheme (mathematics); Empirical research; Political science; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2557447438557932,"score_gpt":0.4664951813377429,"score_spread":0.21075043748194972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W587819908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05568251,0.000043205637,0.0003877496,0.43637452,0.0019407267,0.00069108506,0.0000074501877,0.00022235165,0.5046504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7782289,0.0005417634,0.00065070606,0.002187584,0.00061280106,0.0000034257052,0.000019817871,0.00003375086,0.21772127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951468,0.0016703914,0.0003803046,0.0006458842,0.0011733703,0.0009832166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703145,0.0010489855,0.00019310549,0.00050910475,0.00049187074,0.00072548504],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023485373,0.00025727626,0.00027013678,0.0012045071,0.002198391,0.00022121644,0.0009833443,0.000774927,0.0028501395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002794182,0.00023494368,0.0001333159,0.0046474794,0.0006588095,0.0011606902,0.00010052561,0.0045082164,0.0005498503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001721359,0.000272331,0.010218918,0.0000066898633,0.00008135784,0.000034949513,0.012677082,0.000025069565,0.00008659249,0.572606,0.40241572,0.0014031015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009018735,0.000063978485,0.00029849174,0.000031878284,0.000028288396,0.0000020546138,0.038116936,0.0000075882244,0.0003555059,0.003398891,0.9564699,0.00032463684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032348253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004267495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7225464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012403899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00428421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W588353516","doi":"","title":"A simple common lawyer : essays in honour of Michael Taggert","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Honour; Law; Economic Justice; State (computer science); History; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0396921525145215,"score_gpt":0.35618298549205185,"score_spread":0.31649083297753033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W588353516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039496607,0.00007395277,0.0000055160526,0.0030193694,0.0002364904,0.00031440076,0.000020429436,0.000038694518,0.99589616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059708223,0.000018842251,0.00012237653,0.0019478848,0.0003775801,0.000023072744,0.00006345334,0.000019632138,0.9377189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998664,0.00018785318,0.00040375086,0.00019578067,0.00032503862,0.0002235734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988846,0.00028512778,0.0003342491,0.0002443944,0.00017824436,0.000073369236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008315829,0.00014348429,0.00028910532,0.00022484396,0.00022401115,0.00007527541,0.00027957358,0.0003007502,0.0005675605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022526695,0.0001580391,0.00008045739,0.00010664356,0.00018833646,0.0001480819,0.000027370023,0.00073197443,0.00012869739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012686487,0.00008773106,0.00012258008,0.000025783074,0.000017846802,0.000007662256,0.01800692,9.0112695e-7,0.000030449279,0.6366358,0.3346207,0.01043096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001298541,0.000016475657,0.00014613706,0.000073621035,0.000015047249,8.924093e-7,0.0007890685,0.0000014733008,0.000032577682,0.059158094,0.9394821,0.00015463869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044440837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015164241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60486144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018996198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002691863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8462002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W589388014","doi":"10.2307/25149395","title":"Gender in the Legal Profession: Fitting or Breaking the Mould","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07091684834777205,"score_gpt":0.3785065807837027,"score_spread":0.30758973243593063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W589388014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42971405,0.00017654177,0.00010199768,0.16580744,0.00093492045,0.00042118432,0.0000025516117,0.0000556976,0.40278563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639609,0.000018920487,0.00020914536,0.007532029,0.00024009362,0.00004113413,0.0000010557802,0.0000068624013,0.027989902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817675,0.0009516117,0.00018904859,0.00012736353,0.00030715938,0.0002480552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902254,0.00056718354,0.0000996136,0.00019058363,0.00009101163,0.000029048106],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002744497,0.00006819639,0.00006387006,0.00003537459,0.0012077482,0.00033295128,0.000301525,0.00006978002,0.00095921796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013538988,0.00003702498,0.000024751476,0.00095545873,0.00011812883,0.0004943317,0.000009516162,0.00055183045,0.000057895668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006160074,0.00008988036,0.0020503697,0.000005291153,0.0000057225507,0.00000391224,0.14809144,0.0000054327634,0.000034274075,0.837941,0.0069723567,0.004794147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013091139,0.000004243276,0.015842635,0.0000071725735,0.0000037574434,0.0000056318986,0.14230601,0.0000040010073,0.00002448127,0.0016461364,0.8399606,0.000064419284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00851134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008966914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8362949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003766887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013104115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W591794062","doi":"","title":"The exchange university : corporatization of academic culture","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"UBC Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Politics; Corporatization; Social science; Commons; Scientism; Capitalism; Sociology; Political science; Economic history; Law; History","score_opus":0.08019788068095221,"score_gpt":0.3309623248504566,"score_spread":0.2507644441695044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W591794062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000070927053,0.0005514488,0.000049509097,0.0009380825,0.0004971801,0.00032395235,0.000035101177,0.000044023494,0.9975536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00049579085,0.00299063,0.000036830214,0.00013003813,0.0004151389,0.0000037245243,0.0000462188,0.000009571054,0.9958721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990249,0.00019858655,0.00017628942,0.00013299772,0.00033872994,0.00012846956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985991,0.00022831008,0.0005269163,0.00019116336,0.00040283648,0.000051679912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031714854,0.00009538108,0.000112917776,0.00005078365,0.0008702011,0.00004161658,0.00040475777,0.00037872407,0.000033545373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022593609,0.00008107952,0.00005100354,0.000047936814,0.0004751794,0.00018078371,0.00004587108,0.00069167075,0.000011006131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007240022,0.0000040795753,0.0000032941157,0.0000111493455,0.000016181024,8.06669e-7,0.020736763,3.760462e-7,0.0000031687546,0.5944744,0.3821072,0.0026353654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006452239,0.000007641915,0.000007850585,0.00002899007,0.00002985249,5.781898e-7,0.00076012604,0.0000015571001,0.000017046697,0.00284404,0.9961484,0.00008941504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012701555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075630005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61404115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015786645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020728384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6692971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W595612711","doi":"10.5860/choice.40-1198","title":"Consequences: the impact of law and its complexity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.3878402613515508,"score_gpt":0.5048767076401325,"score_spread":0.11703644628858167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W595612711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16217317,0.12844093,0.000023139104,0.24069287,0.0005540092,0.0020944825,0.00021382191,0.000086317734,0.46572128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613799,0.033099927,0.00041604022,0.003089964,0.0003381679,0.0000139304475,0.000012957044,0.000004778257,0.0016443342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914116,0.0003131002,0.00024511202,0.00008448414,0.00010806202,0.00010810931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902666,0.00041981429,0.00020694229,0.00013609398,0.00015359843,0.00005691481],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074486725,0.00005882632,0.0001530509,0.000017974564,0.00031476677,0.000049246166,0.00015595941,0.000029928904,0.0017985129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021474122,0.000034552388,0.000057452813,0.00035434106,0.0005020782,0.0003097158,0.000013014526,0.00016532568,0.00005333046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002922628,0.00052831223,0.0016020304,0.00012000212,0.00004565805,4.8910226e-7,0.016549317,0.0000018533292,0.0005874455,0.92455614,0.028604552,0.027401265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005568038,0.00001567186,0.0013047984,0.000045578225,0.000013304507,0.0000015933206,0.0002547121,0.000041645017,0.000007755369,0.0010460283,0.99716467,0.00004856123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009822088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043562455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003255701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010543637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W602559176","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737710.001.0001","title":"Anti-Bribery Laws in Common Law Jurisdictions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Legislation; Common law; Conflict of laws; Business; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Liability; Political science; Enforcement","score_opus":0.03397323711534432,"score_gpt":0.29383888692795923,"score_spread":0.2598656498126149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W602559176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015128436,0.0000161213,0.00004198244,0.0013723847,0.0006226763,0.0003141158,0.000054589967,0.0001248418,0.997302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056001125,0.00010206774,0.00009984426,0.0005490319,0.00030188193,0.0000019196993,0.00007902448,0.000018624625,0.9932475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986411,0.00029922434,0.0002062217,0.00027622617,0.00029810244,0.0002791347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988351,0.00030489828,0.00024540623,0.00032974902,0.0001612313,0.00012363882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041963565,0.00016708086,0.00028123934,0.00022647859,0.000844562,0.00015106835,0.00047122056,0.00042149174,0.00011695431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025114054,0.00021851111,0.000097810735,0.00006977432,0.00046053677,0.00040421105,0.00010337164,0.0009278429,0.000008456851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008695864,0.00003295633,0.000034906356,0.000014863726,0.000023017154,0.000010186422,0.0037157126,0.000004190078,6.568987e-7,0.9344238,0.06090476,0.00082624913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020299452,0.0000113644555,0.00004622698,0.000058123882,0.00005585137,8.9320383e-7,0.00045709524,0.000004836514,0.0000028172703,0.0030196558,0.9959132,0.00022693528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009869989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027243057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93500847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005073864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012722419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99672335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W603772582","doi":"","title":"Moralism: A Study of a Vice by Craig Taylor (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; History; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018672442620560763,"score_gpt":0.30080138098695075,"score_spread":0.28212893836638997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W603772582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43562624,0.0019837804,0.0011187991,0.031694967,0.000693188,0.0013134117,0.000045458914,0.000107123225,0.527417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954703,0.00012236444,0.00025171012,0.00026571515,0.000031441803,3.845508e-7,0.0000047168487,0.0000026740686,0.0038507201],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916345,0.00027339952,0.00012635777,0.00010972119,0.00023198016,0.0000951197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919844,0.00010607533,0.00020611314,0.00016794658,0.00026305384,0.0000583944],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044489687,0.000050850584,0.00014403528,0.000017902368,0.00018792214,0.000009995478,0.00025241417,0.00003441617,0.0020535886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007911788,0.000059840335,0.000036843576,0.00010727244,0.00008779554,0.00063566404,0.000008141202,0.000061598745,0.00002043591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054402342,0.0021768438,0.0015554333,0.00013810211,0.00010580565,0.0000015239236,0.6192925,6.751981e-7,0.00034647572,0.024680693,0.28889614,0.06275142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004014441,0.00051479763,0.0021360843,0.000027502403,0.00005569474,1.5522069e-7,0.20477864,0.000011476985,0.000002410646,0.000051881765,0.79193157,0.000088357396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32458624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15698692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.559844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008072171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103083614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W604368464","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1878671","title":"Text Work as Identity Work for Legal Writers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Identity (music); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.04710310200457926,"score_gpt":0.36564701374643915,"score_spread":0.3185439117418599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W604368464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40277335,0.002149388,0.036541265,0.10476662,0.006630939,0.0009871149,0.0000037768516,0.00021095206,0.4459366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96915275,0.00049459975,0.0006776428,0.0008605506,0.0008620498,0.000016586033,0.0000020067678,0.000013011484,0.02792083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786127,0.00014541099,0.00023293257,0.00013090542,0.00028952665,0.0013399771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992012,0.0001294804,0.00019660273,0.000107226515,0.00025386194,0.000111623645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034478465,0.00008364233,0.00009094302,0.000113210044,0.0010570218,0.00035589444,0.00035726978,0.000081273734,0.00081186066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083349016,0.000082346116,0.000100065176,0.00084226235,0.0001032334,0.0019188158,0.000013643348,0.0015508225,0.00023959587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069143505,0.00007876437,0.0024676197,8.782194e-7,0.000053255986,6.010067e-7,0.0066165267,3.527443e-7,0.0000050851827,0.97461164,0.0042093173,0.011886838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028861588,0.000095336116,0.0026331963,0.000013084771,0.000039420167,0.000024123197,0.023943178,2.926504e-7,0.000012403069,0.42927116,0.5435147,0.00016447027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026772826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006794527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56637937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068365876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007257208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W611033512","doi":"","title":"Book Review (reviewing Stacy Steele & Kathryn Taylor, eds., Legal Education in Asia: Globalization, Change and Contexts (2010))","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06060888822639129,"score_gpt":0.3402191460374222,"score_spread":0.27961025781103094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W611033512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000031976444,0.3511353,0.000075305026,0.018055163,0.0011258536,0.0009855157,0.000005613327,0.000060546274,0.6285247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51833856,0.42441884,0.0010629792,0.010456435,0.00089014927,0.00067304017,0.00011020977,0.000046581856,0.0440032],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840254,0.0003569445,0.00041239403,0.00028466634,0.00026480647,0.00027863198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896324,0.00007983786,0.00025664552,0.0002403496,0.0003217278,0.00013818215],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011789148,0.00013972973,0.00022461485,0.00012787779,0.00033032248,0.00011491991,0.00016687285,0.00008757112,0.0027233697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084569113,0.000142756,0.000039167506,0.00085009035,0.00014934737,0.0021961282,0.000026792351,0.00022368791,0.00016371325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009238223,0.00037209023,0.0023326238,0.00039343635,0.000016438737,0.0000024690203,0.049319584,3.123989e-8,0.0000041958124,0.17731649,0.61287487,0.15735854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100016274,0.000015144612,0.0013846941,0.00042589987,0.000025445079,0.0000034465452,0.047751337,0.0000016842826,0.0000041729477,0.00031064104,0.9498205,0.00015698245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034464141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091644604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58452153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013955204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000933473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99818826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W611675250","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2607","title":"Thoughtful Practitioners and an Engaged Legal Community: The Impact of the Teaching of Procedure on the Legal Profession and on Civil Justice Reform","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legal profession; Vocational education; Law; Civil procedure; Legal education; Subject (documents); Political science; Law reform; Civil law (Civil law); Legal practice; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.05555797097368087,"score_gpt":0.3956649873373307,"score_spread":0.3401070163636498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W611675250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6083,0.000019319255,0.000004927582,0.07262608,0.00019224612,0.00029297746,0.0000057871016,0.000008110612,0.31855062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978311,0.000034949153,0.00007336519,0.0011719742,0.00024403266,0.000010987519,0.0000014352645,0.000008682457,0.0006234525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947734,0.004343777,0.00024910507,0.000077395125,0.00039254336,0.00016379535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973166,0.0015623952,0.0005324414,0.0002554939,0.0002549393,0.0000781256],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060182987,0.00010010241,0.000107652515,0.00003761088,0.00793353,0.00035641083,0.00034185743,0.00006413999,0.00009409581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026119188,0.000042630385,0.000051192415,0.00018967112,0.00041329383,0.0015781344,0.00004663811,0.004013876,0.000001944553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051975105,0.00029446502,0.0003788939,0.000015674852,0.000039185612,2.721481e-7,0.055862866,0.000020610845,0.0007415719,0.9384928,0.0030858328,0.0010158699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008795655,0.00087682396,0.06530968,0.0005965799,0.0002152581,0.0001785508,0.86728156,0.00037367074,0.000684142,0.041172687,0.022113744,0.00031772823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15834163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05397866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8973201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011058026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050985406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W613687798","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1496","title":"Poor Canadian Legal Education: So Near to Wall Street, So Far From God","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Globalization; Moral panic; Legal education; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Legal profession; Sociology","score_opus":0.020234439480748198,"score_gpt":0.3243462018788552,"score_spread":0.304111762398107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W613687798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018908944,0.00020230062,0.00002298128,0.23937084,0.001326477,0.00014750371,0.000032452284,0.000034198274,0.7399543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492459,0.000090838614,0.0034405373,0.027991688,0.0019940923,0.0000119059905,0.000028993432,0.000019576486,0.017176414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982625,0.00023141853,0.00034203776,0.00021901267,0.00045214975,0.0004928571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982079,0.0000952989,0.00011991212,0.00021141536,0.0003630378,0.001002422],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005878702,0.00013723424,0.00013782417,0.00010111697,0.0053871353,0.0035436465,0.00046735557,0.00012817782,0.03095504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020468222,0.00014345189,0.00007713601,0.0004894063,0.0002379967,0.0013445468,0.000010748121,0.0007519068,0.0016695514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014448426,0.0001656276,0.0006002562,0.0000012275766,0.000038693186,0.0000170993,0.0132084275,0.000050024482,0.000016675287,0.8049391,0.10360071,0.07734773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001333508,0.00002482715,0.0011372396,0.00001813394,0.000022068643,0.00002108755,0.0034670294,0.000013287993,0.000013096755,0.0077437246,0.98722017,0.00018597195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99669695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.930337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005069529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01510176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W622776753","doi":"","title":"LibGuides. Justice Studies - Canadian Justice System. Additional Resources.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08005071127137192,"score_gpt":0.38872009319267714,"score_spread":0.3086693819213052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W622776753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014393477,0.0010951342,0.0000064656633,0.08938573,0.019439206,0.00041501975,0.0035871915,0.0003248668,0.885732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002754393,0.0014093268,0.003904217,0.022576533,0.02987889,0.00034612988,0.0030631914,0.00010410036,0.9359632],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660486,0.00038649462,0.00070613116,0.0005388379,0.0010160381,0.00074764644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926337,0.0033277767,0.0005285292,0.00049206783,0.002361969,0.0006559865],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017692909,0.00035244884,0.0004349279,0.0006994929,0.0038600138,0.00083747786,0.000832524,0.00093508617,0.045813415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016675068,0.0003466672,0.0001285425,0.001124717,0.0006776905,0.0008757288,0.00006771582,0.0021548185,0.0023178472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018888225,0.000017032744,0.000001766933,0.00034343085,0.00009215325,0.000012178109,0.0066021876,0.0000010221074,2.5870136e-7,0.20112164,0.79148334,0.0003231109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006837425,0.000008842066,0.00002712328,0.00021200674,0.00088144845,0.000009728005,0.0869842,0.0000040185014,5.5315405e-7,0.0003552473,0.9110577,0.00039072614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6461297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8946524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24852268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012990062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015949134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W624745527","doi":"","title":"Life Sketches of Eminent Lawyers: American, English and Canadian, to Which is Added Thoughts, Facts and Facetiæ ...","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science; Sociology; Genealogy; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031281224533744156,"score_gpt":0.33042545557480524,"score_spread":0.2991442310410611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W624745527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010350728,0.00027698895,0.000005937471,0.09305019,0.00024734545,0.00040429298,0.00008043784,0.00003784333,0.90486187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039325386,0.0014060487,0.0012979473,0.025205532,0.0010038145,0.000013194255,0.000060054488,0.000024057876,0.931664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998664,0.00009069815,0.00029774106,0.00031644574,0.00033921786,0.00029186957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975614,0.00033462534,0.00023406922,0.00019739105,0.00082754163,0.00084499863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037720354,0.00018620557,0.00031735413,0.00028598425,0.0002917271,0.00024951322,0.00017920716,0.00020578605,0.00076932594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033847352,0.00018219027,0.000029428023,0.0005650239,0.00024723343,0.0003297671,0.00002736158,0.00035112386,0.000023687802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037211844,0.000016565573,0.00020451588,0.000012250845,0.00003288029,4.2631353e-7,0.05248851,2.5479068e-7,0.0000015420771,0.023481237,0.9183295,0.005428591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006430529,0.00004075746,0.0009818682,0.000035025514,0.000026577076,3.2542883e-7,0.016434394,5.202289e-7,0.000016395834,0.00052483723,0.9816575,0.00021748606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33721405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70564944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36843535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020388796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009129252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W638823170","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342059","title":"Current Demographics in Large Corporate Law Firms in South Africa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographics; Corporate law; Political science; Legal profession; Law; Race (biology); Accounting; Business; Sociology; Corporate governance; Gender studies; Demography; Finance","score_opus":0.20382228290913554,"score_gpt":0.4085684871761593,"score_spread":0.20474620426702375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W638823170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75191176,0.028375283,0.00012219019,0.084186554,0.004900725,0.0004102601,0.000020984246,0.000038514034,0.13003372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987948,0.0003683827,0.0002131525,0.00019461274,0.0002565674,0.0000054317497,4.351845e-7,0.0000055455566,0.00016106872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825895,0.00035912814,0.00052163453,0.00009893926,0.00047174905,0.00028957348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981247,0.00025688397,0.0006461208,0.00007379276,0.00075806846,0.00014044403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031571505,0.00009262898,0.00025757958,0.00032092875,0.00020187104,0.00010341522,0.0002123345,0.000037263795,0.000013871391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021172597,0.00007729192,0.000056394245,0.0017980206,0.0002859182,0.000849347,0.000038377464,0.0006233769,0.000009733326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072683135,0.00044374348,0.15801899,0.000009036387,0.000060009403,0.000051657433,0.39281067,0.000023941056,0.0000019665974,0.43948498,0.008317947,0.00070437364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056255475,0.000081817285,0.0047188257,0.000053359425,0.000015743495,0.0000026236264,0.26330516,0.000003216677,0.000001372548,0.008801577,0.7223474,0.00010635262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006134986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011262638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71402943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029303806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009041105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62848157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W648694678","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1194","title":"The Role of Technology in the Provision of Poverty Law Services","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal service; Work (physics); Poverty; Legal research; Public relations; Legal profession; Realization (probability); Political science; Engineering ethics; Business; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.013646776839421062,"score_gpt":0.3646321301634562,"score_spread":0.35098535332403513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W648694678","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35152608,0.00017621872,0.000002914692,0.39583632,0.00012527134,0.00009670235,0.0000023810346,0.0000035888313,0.25223053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99688494,0.000058118134,0.000025969093,0.002591584,0.00039541873,6.8919417e-7,1.3104868e-7,0.0000015287256,0.000041620715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992993,0.00018546253,0.00022704058,0.000025888467,0.0001829696,0.000079344725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991941,0.00019639813,0.00036094186,0.000044968056,0.00019096165,0.0000126180275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001262666,0.000028063103,0.00008744692,0.00005528738,0.00041724643,0.000046671994,0.00019999499,0.00006267105,0.000003846443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001682475,0.00001563779,0.000030075129,0.00028538852,0.000330961,0.00022415968,0.000013586544,0.00018378535,3.926129e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008124349,0.000033792345,0.0002852606,0.000004324523,0.0000047375174,4.0468628e-8,0.032021396,1.124814e-7,0.00022915538,0.9615113,0.00008966698,0.0058120773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011256601,0.000044032422,0.0012837105,0.00000841804,0.000006595102,0.0000013249983,0.037103526,0.000002205996,0.00013529898,0.25097042,0.71031207,0.000019850417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021596484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006683262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7105409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016530059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023112034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W648893246","doi":"","title":"From Litigation to Mediation: Using Advocacy Skills for Success in Mandatory or Court-Connected Mediation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Lawyer supported mediation; Party-directed mediation; Political science; Law; Transformative mediation; Dispute resolution; Settlement (finance); Public relations; Business; Dispute mechanism","score_opus":0.021180906275249167,"score_gpt":0.3670503617553391,"score_spread":0.34586945548008996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W648893246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9276794,0.00010105114,0.012205065,0.05780604,0.0010409952,0.0006773027,0.000007187725,0.000032388652,0.00045057217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99469125,0.00025091047,0.0014136323,0.0008382691,0.001964895,0.0000763912,0.000054069984,0.00001481241,0.00069578923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978838,0.00024618502,0.00040467316,0.00017362303,0.00036829637,0.0009234329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982109,0.00066359655,0.00029576995,0.00009626003,0.0006017639,0.00013172592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022429551,0.00009706796,0.00012787072,0.00025603155,0.00051981123,0.0003210191,0.00021533055,0.000110905545,0.0007795763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030792088,0.00009134862,0.000037453403,0.00076264195,0.00003745017,0.0018810305,0.000010563607,0.0008019197,0.000059415426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045294582,0.0012809779,0.06495308,0.00003299808,0.00040502494,0.00000328881,0.22975922,0.00085196045,0.0056129065,0.44509134,0.017509548,0.2340467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003690631,0.00035922043,0.04202675,0.000107120206,0.00009050177,0.000020263848,0.15048355,0.0019596026,0.0006963354,0.69458103,0.105122484,0.00086251245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011542039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031757053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24948968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017065399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011645526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W651096436","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1372","title":"Book Review: The Great Juristic Bazaar: Jurists' Texts and Lawyers' Stories, by William Twining","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bazaar; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017977954878623893,"score_gpt":0.3320692991919636,"score_spread":0.3140913443133397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W651096436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008340478,0.25123543,0.0003078501,0.26481107,0.0010511621,0.00027654658,0.000013523497,0.00005509144,0.48216593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6120764,0.17246114,0.0011036354,0.18301855,0.0028017997,0.00004621262,0.000033029366,0.000059056238,0.028400198],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984212,0.00027992448,0.0003418136,0.00016709392,0.00047740957,0.00031258469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998812,0.00024714431,0.00028790292,0.00017982502,0.0002599019,0.00021317966],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014706915,0.00013163897,0.0001662949,0.000029691946,0.002891789,0.00057435234,0.0002857662,0.00007836231,0.0009813479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068071735,0.00009791583,0.00005771118,0.00029494916,0.00038762772,0.0010952295,0.000028983928,0.0008554982,0.00006504202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047008325,0.000040404564,0.00007949835,0.000015884649,0.000022870903,0.000005515471,0.0034293015,0.0000021358674,0.0000067281885,0.27670655,0.7184099,0.0012765022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022431696,0.000027394713,0.00007755451,0.00014690367,0.000059381793,0.000066224464,0.000641759,4.4472446e-7,0.000007275518,0.013344589,0.9852737,0.00013042652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018746745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020339618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61199296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020303582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062271935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W651638839","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511807039","title":"Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":706,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Identification (biology); Politics; Computer science; Management science; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.05129526871474356,"score_gpt":0.33859178021581804,"score_spread":0.2872965115010745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W651638839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007709065,0.000044321634,0.000130572,0.0012667351,0.0004528691,0.00024983878,0.0001353066,0.000051505227,0.99759173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049441187,0.000044915007,0.0003117952,0.00022620495,0.0003524462,8.8532397e-7,0.000069213,0.000011552144,0.9940389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892396,0.00016674177,0.00018378519,0.00019780747,0.0003528958,0.00017481456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987902,0.00033192316,0.00022561967,0.00018756278,0.0003538429,0.000110833585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002625626,0.00011695888,0.00017119372,0.00015630781,0.00036357436,0.00007069107,0.0002773469,0.0002242838,0.00009583798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017548249,0.00015688367,0.00008811803,0.00003270721,0.0006232325,0.00037263345,0.000057193545,0.0003602826,0.000025829708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011540151,0.000033812485,0.0000018466159,0.000030305504,0.000022336248,0.0000034045884,0.0012768996,2.4269778e-7,0.000012892469,0.7614824,0.23625626,0.0008680683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015106423,0.000015447991,0.000015455149,0.00004092142,0.000107875436,7.1001983e-7,0.0018600805,0.0000017825342,0.00010769905,0.000023338924,0.99752957,0.00014604475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014385541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003987066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76145905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055775524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017470149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63975304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W66244103","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1196","title":"Multi-disciplinary Practice in a Community Law Environment: Clinical Legal Education Combined with Holistic Service Provision","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Leasehold estate; Service (business); Bankruptcy; Legal education; Service-learning; Practice of law; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Legal research; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Political science; Legal profession; Engineering; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.09218450673027834,"score_gpt":0.473167992219119,"score_spread":0.38098348548884065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W66244103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49153644,0.000046428475,0.00018546621,0.34551874,0.00053431705,0.00036073723,0.0000049909645,0.000018531096,0.16179436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807613,0.000051066727,0.0018197307,0.015839405,0.0012331608,0.0000041122066,0.0000045490997,0.000008216858,0.0002784567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719274,0.001828865,0.00045859662,0.000079301884,0.00028347247,0.00015699913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980634,0.0008182638,0.0005903436,0.00009696556,0.00031343297,0.0001175846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028955059,0.000082545965,0.00019611247,0.00008612466,0.0011969489,0.0002096016,0.00017447033,0.000117114396,0.000013722767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010188932,0.000071345625,0.000037741407,0.00026277106,0.000396124,0.0014643553,0.00004067325,0.00096230744,0.00000709076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021967888,0.0016652133,0.00028722658,0.00002080192,0.000018775498,0.0000012465193,0.067302555,0.0000031058462,0.000016278897,0.92666036,0.00030747536,0.003497296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019437622,0.00063163857,0.022181233,0.00006931392,0.000079471,0.000026180003,0.05189638,0.00003616333,0.000002298661,0.011633035,0.9113078,0.00019268206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0698882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015632756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9150273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013311315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014328639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9363055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912120298","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.15429150","title":"The Urge to Enlarge the Nigerian Law School Curriculum: Queries From Without, Answers From Within","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Legal research; Legal education; International Legal English Certificate; Legal profession; Legal opinion; Curriculum development; Empirical legal studies","score_opus":0.0338395146311163,"score_gpt":0.30165011490603716,"score_spread":0.2678106002749209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912120298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018273042,0.00021150765,0.0002345989,0.051321693,0.0009232664,0.00080930133,0.0006394679,0.00042789185,0.94524956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060273923,0.00067006546,0.00060521066,0.0099735735,0.0025954966,0.0000011506245,0.0034517983,0.0017889546,0.9206398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973927,0.0006085761,0.0004328736,0.0004880134,0.00073047326,0.00034735707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972457,0.00028190558,0.00031424873,0.00078826374,0.0011017043,0.00026815233],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015729744,0.00022870442,0.00020251003,0.00013565039,0.011292542,0.004038154,0.001864782,0.00018555569,0.027010435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037168346,0.00017498061,0.00008553684,0.0004251824,0.00066760357,0.00050250243,0.0006941433,0.0010625293,0.009425467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002123812,0.000019856128,0.0000039186243,0.0000030228236,0.000072482675,0.0000014922224,0.0069228453,0.0000015193224,0.000017835548,0.5788528,0.40911466,0.004968381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111579626,0.000028847438,0.00004482426,0.00006482985,0.000040336927,0.0000010965009,0.0059415805,0.0000049704004,0.000010568553,0.009469091,0.98407006,0.0002122266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009000593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009750641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5749554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033475098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014024031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6922378326","doi":"10.11575/prism/34148","title":"Professional Ethics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Professional ethics; Government (linguistics); Legal ethics; Professional association; Legislation; Power (physics); Professional responsibility; Professional conduct","score_opus":0.040172444518802065,"score_gpt":0.3386182772292818,"score_spread":0.2984458327104797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6922378326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009878855,0.00012652256,0.004397613,0.045928974,0.0006235385,0.00014303389,8.7469795e-7,0.000082978375,0.9486866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000069585985,0.0003722789,0.019679131,0.00042086342,0.00014963884,1.9009413e-7,0.000020026362,0.000030252791,0.97925806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991337,0.00019500428,0.0000615592,0.00012536983,0.0003669881,0.00011734457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993285,0.0001492063,0.00022699067,0.00013159192,0.00009242801,0.000071269176],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004078184,0.00006658403,0.00011301202,0.00018062387,0.00035132206,0.000013040277,0.00027156447,0.00046172086,0.039067924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023390344,0.000084445135,0.000050070612,0.0002133581,0.00030148515,0.00016752725,0.00004118159,0.0007653137,0.00036524766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036263762,0.00006170962,0.000032894437,0.0000147635565,0.00002014087,0.0000015255421,0.014637176,5.3116103e-9,0.0000011844395,0.09518886,0.8483721,0.04166601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009618061,0.0000040521063,0.00023044928,0.000048890146,0.0000218925,1.317219e-7,0.0012256925,0.000011802754,3.4190145e-7,0.00022389476,0.9980433,0.00009335423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026140412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030676378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14967121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005876457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001852399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9803446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6923236722","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0089682.s001","title":"Figure S1 - Diversity of Rumen Bacteria in Canadian Cervids","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rarefaction (ecology); Rumen; Bacteria; Diversity (politics); Similarity (geometry)","score_opus":0.10096207676329193,"score_gpt":0.36021474487848815,"score_spread":0.2592526681151962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6923236722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005906419,0.000052295833,2.3712816e-9,0.0022765691,0.00017872332,0.00013282672,0.15733546,0.000020801259,0.8399974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046577356,0.0000058972905,0.000024244408,0.000403578,0.00034712427,0.000018102952,0.10308671,0.00004107122,0.89141554],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937093,0.00007557068,0.0000870583,0.000104960964,0.00017946662,0.0001820093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994009,0.000036375604,0.00012951695,0.0001306349,0.00013367478,0.00016886744],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000105406,0.00006844096,0.00010471034,0.00023911685,0.00010802888,0.000041735024,0.00027305906,0.0002413006,0.90417635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015519814,0.00007759348,0.000018666788,0.0004481067,0.0000118004355,0.00014523412,0.000055843215,0.00019819854,0.005219913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.125028e-7,0.0000099720055,0.00029276666,0.000026112852,0.0000056037093,0.0000015337395,0.00378869,4.827578e-8,8.85852e-8,0.00020754368,0.9955277,0.00013945828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004590561,0.0000033690733,0.00088490226,0.00031308332,0.0000030206195,5.556969e-8,0.00066707586,1.8587839e-7,3.3248716e-7,0.000033584518,0.99796367,0.00008481534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8876778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97061354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8989565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002534171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004188309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6949455787","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.14289158","title":"ETHICAL STANDARDS AND JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE: ENSURING INTEGRITY IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"GRi Simulations (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical standards; Legal ethics; Ethical code; Confidentiality; Legislation; Legal profession","score_opus":0.07109451823664936,"score_gpt":0.403155308760693,"score_spread":0.33206079052404364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6949455787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118773505,0.0002129719,0.0011321184,0.24526381,0.0007734789,0.00070475176,0.00010090511,0.0006472455,0.6323912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830216,0.00009384338,0.000050555736,0.000610669,0.00026522536,7.3388e-8,0.000056689758,0.00011547366,0.0005053166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975912,0.0011709611,0.00015676003,0.00020154245,0.0006852682,0.00019427939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991904,0.00015340986,0.000032510223,0.00012366888,0.00043787056,0.00006213389],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006648081,0.00005730176,0.000057585916,0.00016150027,0.0026631937,0.0021381897,0.00040176348,0.00013228126,0.0035925598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004469145,0.000046721365,0.000015984751,0.0009104101,0.0002596739,0.00056134054,0.00020349048,0.0018717563,0.0003687328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002881306,0.000066038054,0.000019362162,0.000036670168,0.000008982903,0.00001769633,0.08623144,0.00000134507,0.00020580871,0.6753739,0.14093041,0.09707949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080529186,0.000031574935,0.0010456983,0.000046155263,0.0000040907044,0.000019223848,0.012636209,0.000048690617,0.000014328441,0.001801563,0.98421216,0.000059779733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007970075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055642435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87952864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018543773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096173026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958168697","doi":"10.60770/p4tf-d018","title":"Tangible change or deaf ears?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MRU-Repo","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Law enforcement; Curriculum; Enforcement","score_opus":0.2766588934111086,"score_gpt":0.5076964657687175,"score_spread":0.2310375723576089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958168697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021559782,0.00066116947,0.00018614683,0.29050666,0.004564927,0.00033806424,0.00001057973,0.00046758537,0.6817051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8272844,0.00009301263,0.00066109106,0.0031264601,0.001582263,0.00007857486,0.000008610858,0.0000125364395,0.16715308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923944,0.00007188445,0.00012544142,0.00015386385,0.00022116993,0.00018821734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994947,0.00020464155,0.000032321183,0.00013278815,0.000064933716,0.00007061463],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057412003,0.00005441512,0.00005658387,0.000098200886,0.00034407317,0.0004446559,0.00011990384,0.00006120049,0.0070684236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055337243,0.000045020966,0.000033047483,0.0010084261,0.000064073356,0.0008081706,0.000018247383,0.00018562634,0.0018217928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008782991,0.00007364712,0.00068014726,0.000026205642,0.000029234356,0.000039020375,0.06622153,4.1185393e-7,0.00008187028,0.6061989,0.29247025,0.034170005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030363779,0.000011525993,0.0004669794,0.000017142038,0.0000101884725,0.0000036710678,0.0027950648,0.00002178144,0.000060906423,0.002049741,0.9944597,0.00007292784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074500446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030667868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8057246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008296432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065097585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958846389","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7287496","title":"Multi-trait association mapping for phosphorous efficiency reveals flexible root architectures in sorghum","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Sorghum; Root system; Lateral root; Hydroponics; Quantitative trait locus; Crop; Panicle; Genetic architecture; Crop yield; Plant breeding","score_opus":0.04440901511104436,"score_gpt":0.3345188956694798,"score_spread":0.29010988055843545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958846389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04123766,0.046057902,0.10770731,0.01651101,0.022922222,0.016371971,0.0022293185,0.0024488326,0.7445138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5130559,0.00012177248,0.0010636679,0.00012300872,0.0010866199,0.00042534847,0.0001101946,0.00028678967,0.48372665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971927,0.00029686847,0.0006460661,0.0006051402,0.0006580441,0.00060118217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989964,0.00015185354,0.000505758,0.00022501423,0.000018655599,0.000102335944],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020804452,0.00031114282,0.0004123654,0.00037048443,0.00043115715,0.00035956738,0.00030450174,0.0006658774,0.00038146123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027622865,0.00033973067,0.00017934483,0.00032778925,0.000080035,0.00014314232,0.000052879728,0.000742736,0.00029158912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055251443,0.0020603607,0.04966447,0.0029608277,0.0009755317,0.00001889395,0.27000484,0.05585425,0.0018551829,0.016235372,0.59623396,0.0040810416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007387589,0.000030843632,0.00010619313,0.0010411539,0.000115170515,0.0000020022826,0.15355213,0.012099246,0.0000013288542,0.0015191856,0.82983786,0.0009561082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017387222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005739998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4718183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023524277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027188397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6966810344","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1311.0292","title":"Runaway greenhouse effect on exomoons due to irradiation from hot, young giant planets","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Planet; Jupiter (rocket family); Circumstellar habitable zone; Hot Jupiter; Giant planet; Gas giant; Transit (satellite); Spitzer Space Telescope; Icy moon","score_opus":0.07652943981642095,"score_gpt":0.2472442988783948,"score_spread":0.17071485906197387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6966810344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91897905,0.00001409174,0.0013746924,0.0037740741,0.0026225946,0.0009883655,0.00014327966,0.00025291965,0.07185093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909796,0.000050899453,0.00014450696,0.00074585056,0.0005194211,0.000008140013,0.00020651857,0.000025088286,0.007319991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792904,0.0005838435,0.00020742764,0.0007259097,0.0001973593,0.00035645225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978306,0.0007132644,0.0002966024,0.00063103705,0.0002085166,0.00031993186],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000523148,0.00026422556,0.00028245564,0.00036361133,0.00061377295,0.00034366103,0.0006441286,0.00039913546,0.0013754966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005829056,0.000302551,0.00011493028,0.00074193225,0.000110626446,0.00054977596,0.00017478732,0.00092398975,0.002101862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055587856,0.00086643075,0.023691308,0.000092632974,0.00059364,0.0004946588,0.045543928,0.039620254,0.00036379707,0.78480273,0.09626226,0.007112458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024828918,0.00078321475,0.42321253,0.0005982449,0.00089568115,0.0000070310293,0.009264869,0.011794866,0.0003237798,0.045282874,0.5016298,0.003724191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083585866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014519817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7395199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056170137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069788174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6968491336","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.15429151","title":"The Urge to Enlarge the Nigerian Law School Curriculum: Queries From Without, Answers From Within","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Legal research; Legal education; International Legal English Certificate; Legal profession; Legal opinion; Curriculum development; Empirical legal studies","score_opus":0.0338395146311163,"score_gpt":0.30165011490603716,"score_spread":0.2678106002749209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6968491336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018273042,0.00021150765,0.0002345989,0.051321693,0.0009232664,0.00080930133,0.0006394679,0.00042789185,0.94524956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060273923,0.00067006546,0.00060521066,0.0099735735,0.0025954966,0.0000011506245,0.0034517983,0.0017889546,0.9206398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973927,0.0006085761,0.0004328736,0.0004880134,0.00073047326,0.00034735707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972457,0.00028190558,0.00031424873,0.00078826374,0.0011017043,0.00026815233],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015729744,0.00022870442,0.00020251003,0.00013565039,0.011292542,0.004038154,0.001864782,0.00018555569,0.027010435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037168346,0.00017498061,0.00008553684,0.0004251824,0.00066760357,0.00050250243,0.0006941433,0.0010625293,0.009425467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002123812,0.000019856128,0.0000039186243,0.0000030228236,0.000072482675,0.0000014922224,0.0069228453,0.0000015193224,0.000017835548,0.5788528,0.40911466,0.004968381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111579626,0.000028847438,0.00004482426,0.00006482985,0.000040336927,0.0000010965009,0.0059415805,0.0000049704004,0.000010568553,0.009469091,0.98407006,0.0002122266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009000593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009750641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5749554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033475098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014024031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977022258","doi":"10.60770/b8hn-9j13","title":"Understanding mental health, burnout, and substance abuse among legal professionals in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MRU-Repo","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Substance abuse; Intervention (counseling); Mental health; Exploratory research; Legal profession; Substance use; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.08178621083139342,"score_gpt":0.37911701725494906,"score_spread":0.29733080642355564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977022258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77368015,0.000957534,0.000065687214,0.19645965,0.0021904402,0.00031812576,0.00001560142,0.000048205264,0.026264584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99377334,0.00015582157,0.0000566725,0.0014636836,0.00010076361,0.000014330042,0.000008747954,0.000006468103,0.0044201957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989556,0.00013700408,0.00021873596,0.0001717555,0.00029375294,0.0002231236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995369,0.0002001188,0.000064800515,0.0000708847,0.000026935304,0.00010036507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000713953,0.00006185399,0.00008307091,0.00008062212,0.00049372495,0.00023469568,0.000069045374,0.000031614156,0.0002833923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007509808,0.000059682745,0.000011450336,0.0005891489,0.000077398094,0.0007932427,0.0000059036183,0.00027331355,0.0000053392723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002149249,0.00008990331,0.05051091,0.000095803785,0.00003378117,0.000066839195,0.35592023,0.00000919583,0.00003191701,0.3748577,0.21669888,0.0016633618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019571198,0.000011159852,0.009464566,0.000316384,0.0000044813655,0.0000066221382,0.18221016,0.00019501479,0.000023655519,0.0018475007,0.80551565,0.00020909215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9311714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58881676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017937546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052580237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9327508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980321423","doi":"","title":"Bridges between theory and practice: Experiences of students articling in Prince Edward Island","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IslandScholar (University of Prince Edward Island)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Practice theory; Grounded theory; Practice of law; Norm (philosophy); Process (computing)","score_opus":0.018661395963503417,"score_gpt":0.3285082265739747,"score_spread":0.3098468306104713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980321423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747058,0.00016805308,0.0018145825,0.0026623965,0.00018131101,0.00025024274,0.000018632332,0.000027283837,0.020171676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99657005,0.00023303337,0.0011908263,0.000053395383,0.00013499563,0.0000014529422,0.0000102615,0.000007555678,0.001798402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769354,0.00079690135,0.00031011898,0.00031011418,0.00061274966,0.00027657195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762154,0.0013560103,0.0004258678,0.00022338593,0.00029261544,0.00008055636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00364768,0.0001290995,0.00028309142,0.00024137276,0.00044531745,0.00012757955,0.00047444395,0.0001328355,0.00020125532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016233211,0.00014666682,0.000054092467,0.0006152866,0.00046928908,0.0021067294,0.00014263218,0.00038338045,0.00001283256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022051886,0.0003326936,0.7682003,0.000035597375,0.000047542813,0.000013612211,0.21119851,0.000021540729,0.00015190455,0.017628508,0.0005505141,0.0015987994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014312061,0.00009991575,0.4898877,0.000117894415,0.00009082374,0.0000048659936,0.4102561,0.00001210996,0.00021299745,0.002332759,0.09523185,0.00032176205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044933683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010369107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27831253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000725741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036137993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67926586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980647520","doi":"","title":"Combatting complex inequality: the importance of an intersectional approach to Manitoba's human rights complaint process","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Commission; Intersectionality; Human rights; Process (computing); Work (physics); Foundation (evidence)","score_opus":0.07219488665857852,"score_gpt":0.34905899745287594,"score_spread":0.2768641107942974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980647520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8841677,0.000007802305,0.000103550694,0.0032498322,0.0004511511,0.00058687455,0.0000647667,0.000049737097,0.111318626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966272,0.0000015750906,0.0007213475,0.00013709009,0.0001359013,0.000005227207,0.0011400869,0.000014014068,0.0012175171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979493,0.00048119263,0.00025158408,0.00032831592,0.00077874813,0.00021088327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979715,0.00016514113,0.00082328985,0.00031290448,0.00063205016,0.00009514596],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001017744,0.00016200915,0.0002914284,0.00027571636,0.0029855983,0.00007173969,0.00089674507,0.00012399771,0.0002665296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009126133,0.00018296039,0.000100469595,0.00089096505,0.00023226599,0.00050357735,0.00007255053,0.00062059704,0.000009305045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004807235,0.0026302976,0.044126645,0.0007702926,0.00048783884,0.000013200648,0.3019266,0.00052300224,0.0003842535,0.62073636,0.027004706,0.0009160332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020215882,0.000079967635,0.1272307,0.00003608788,0.00007643706,0.0000017390217,0.78361344,0.00008721679,0.000015775628,0.0015376225,0.0868932,0.00022563244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.087934546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9255225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.837588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003268561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039431307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99831235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982557482","doi":"","title":"Integrative Reflective Practice in Canada and Australia: Enhancing Legal Education, Pedagogy, and Professionalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective practice; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Reflection (computer programming); Legal education; Professional development; Legal profession; Legal practice; Professional learning community; Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.02048834854508113,"score_gpt":0.3541579098201325,"score_spread":0.3336695612750514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982557482","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36204037,0.00009976067,0.0000030187418,0.49829242,0.0025631562,0.00089569803,0.00005602492,0.00012346546,0.13592607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29533395,0.00076403975,0.0005877261,0.0006022233,0.0001263195,0.000008503645,0.00039047064,0.000025108491,0.70216167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981461,0.00061777525,0.00019924635,0.00042563444,0.0003391686,0.00027204375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979017,0.0010843751,0.00037452864,0.00013519064,0.0003464677,0.00015775609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019763617,0.00021434277,0.00023329671,0.00043853154,0.0006592833,0.00021986317,0.00020086401,0.00025154528,0.00028184266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013554174,0.00024376762,0.000025750169,0.0013206509,0.00010779688,0.004285666,0.000055586646,0.0010992001,0.0000116022875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002848955,0.00018460347,0.007390554,0.0001515253,0.00012743952,0.000092707225,0.22176398,0.0000018949044,0.000006376397,0.20675226,0.56039315,0.0028506368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009468485,0.000012369968,0.021878697,0.00017085073,0.00003974857,2.9550515e-7,0.50463885,1.2857288e-7,0.00004547763,0.0005893597,0.47232637,0.00020317722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99688756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5662356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007639309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0392726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982746002","doi":"","title":"Job Announcement - Visiting Assistant Professor of Lawyering Skills.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Position (finance); Curriculum; Work (physics); Legal education; People skills; Job market; Teamwork","score_opus":0.0381873241476378,"score_gpt":0.3258125774624519,"score_spread":0.2876252533148141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982746002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8942573,0.000028595416,0.0005701792,0.008557968,0.00025484033,0.00015875495,0.000033027543,0.00003632687,0.096103005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993021,0.00001778768,0.0028930565,0.00010593923,0.0000843279,2.5264654e-7,0.000014594358,0.000005269093,0.003857752],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987948,0.00022851408,0.00018224625,0.00016072916,0.0004265717,0.00020716885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981722,0.00017751404,0.0003238752,0.000260685,0.00096623925,0.00009945905],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008772499,0.00007704148,0.00015309948,0.00019633477,0.0014063499,0.00013338258,0.00045113586,0.00006473315,0.0004902245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040714646,0.00009787898,0.00005910191,0.001023782,0.0004927811,0.0026256912,0.00011540001,0.0003419841,0.000046112276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000681876,0.00057991606,0.7519199,0.000043853608,0.00018231834,0.000007734309,0.0613122,0.0000034990198,0.0005583585,0.16812727,0.0047798576,0.012416895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002429912,0.00008148518,0.55690706,0.000048404014,0.00005278374,4.2336907e-7,0.012694027,0.000012981186,0.000041374922,0.0002567248,0.42952836,0.00013336165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009243351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07580838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4247485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012810908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007655442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983230797","doi":"","title":"Of Lodestars and Lawyers: Incorporating the Duty of Loyalty into the Model Code of Conduct","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Duty; Duty of loyalty; Jurisprudence; Loyalty; Ethical code","score_opus":0.05637354981150868,"score_gpt":0.35049593128195006,"score_spread":0.2941223814704414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983230797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.906021,0.00015441232,0.00050065754,0.06115123,0.00017104439,0.00025988667,0.0000311826,0.000015689195,0.031694923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696934,0.000041029693,0.0015077654,0.0005291345,0.000050633436,0.000008770974,0.0000010753737,0.0000053241283,0.0008869395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998945,0.00024874418,0.00031835123,0.00010844398,0.00027228543,0.000107173386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981736,0.0007455451,0.00041501824,0.00025539382,0.0003613815,0.000049063452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016212738,0.00006209738,0.00012576107,0.00002437788,0.0003149159,0.000035043788,0.00027026515,0.000052921918,0.0001276437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013594609,0.0000322528,0.000033492404,0.0002987738,0.0011070812,0.00051599747,0.00004798113,0.00015348475,0.0000048160964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001359941,0.000041742762,0.00409054,0.000015643529,0.000018255272,7.3929236e-8,0.013183216,0.000045013563,0.006723469,0.9733224,0.0012955444,0.0012505113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021664526,0.0002859461,0.008311636,0.00045712607,0.00022298758,0.0000039529887,0.106590465,0.0014257305,0.048496287,0.51157814,0.31973478,0.00072652404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01616138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01646059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46174428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029042867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005921674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99039006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983453633","doi":"","title":"Measuring Impacts of Legal Services – A Literature Review on Research Design and Methodology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Research design; Legal research; Systematic review; Research methodology","score_opus":0.2850530236677583,"score_gpt":0.4569394633959341,"score_spread":0.1718864397281758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983453633","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040875837,0.08957175,0.0006017857,0.72035,0.0007952456,0.002132351,0.00002643867,0.00019232207,0.14545421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92016226,0.019910796,0.020002797,0.03811931,0.0007923428,0.00005548157,0.000011586274,0.00002294889,0.0009224617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960466,0.0027984313,0.00023298814,0.00022227634,0.00045606052,0.0002436621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975882,0.0013676935,0.00011890141,0.0001647286,0.0005062347,0.00025420546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057598106,0.00008097795,0.00019474042,0.0000688236,0.00041992633,0.0002484327,0.00024302938,0.00009407403,0.00029048845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004900739,0.000071633745,0.000032785072,0.0011153747,0.00016124887,0.00081377657,0.000042457625,0.0007294357,0.00007067116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014677104,0.0000968045,0.00044769395,0.0020121494,0.000054054904,0.000016520311,0.0289252,0.000008032597,0.0033595318,0.93885106,0.022763634,0.003318521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001935392,0.00015635764,0.0004390822,0.0016789885,0.000022931405,0.000004372793,0.0021877692,0.000010151546,0.0012888476,0.002769211,0.99111634,0.00013238059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044115135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010569403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96835274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039801827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048599867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6668918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986339106","doi":"","title":"Parkdale Community Legal Services marks million-dollar milestone in helping ‘precarious’ workers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Milestone; Dismissal; Poverty; Work (physics); Shire; Social work; Legal service; Social Welfare","score_opus":0.02386109615865695,"score_gpt":0.31761262940946594,"score_spread":0.293751533250809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986339106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7051362,0.00026375992,0.00007461764,0.018661404,0.0011770149,0.00030404975,0.000007854071,0.00013699014,0.2742381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988982,0.00005298242,0.001157142,0.005328405,0.00043975216,0.000042133677,0.000039756145,0.000019579868,0.0039382223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969165,0.0016016924,0.00038844466,0.00023316452,0.00041155604,0.00044864696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981709,0.00072452513,0.00018867369,0.00048438495,0.00019489139,0.0002366208],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030686818,0.00016246909,0.00021647674,0.00013063221,0.0016056856,0.0005499911,0.00058771373,0.00019224055,0.0008284334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074040855,0.00017913857,0.00006515902,0.0010593067,0.0002576906,0.001482839,0.00008799828,0.0012441054,0.00037041557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017095775,0.0012792887,0.28347358,0.00023073099,0.00012275562,0.000013289583,0.103976786,0.00050055346,0.00089372694,0.5650227,0.032935336,0.011380321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003767858,0.000024276884,0.023805648,0.00010420497,0.000013763353,0.0000015586041,0.01928035,0.00006184411,0.00007160558,0.0025683332,0.9534297,0.00026192056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30199027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38576284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9204944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021507486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046490555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987277830","doi":"","title":"Someone Out There Helping – Final Report Of The WellCoMs Mobile Van Project","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Service provider; Mobile service; Rural area; Service delivery framework","score_opus":0.044061780121788574,"score_gpt":0.3520172822294507,"score_spread":0.30795550210766215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987277830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45068073,0.00012327071,0.000020330692,0.011950278,0.0018120034,0.00077188504,0.00000744764,0.000060522103,0.5345735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9143915,0.000016039687,0.00025087318,0.00088914717,0.00029742994,0.000045919434,0.0000055832074,0.000010276599,0.084093235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862534,0.00022349716,0.00031016988,0.00020081045,0.00042192533,0.0002182423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879295,0.00016479187,0.00031761095,0.00045751405,0.00021149426,0.00005562947],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010912359,0.00008613211,0.00013311434,0.00003811621,0.00044607488,0.00013947462,0.00035610076,0.0000841446,0.0027628897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053884723,0.000065354914,0.00008440725,0.00047479416,0.00018138767,0.0006111522,0.0000538426,0.00042048102,0.0005790979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041594933,0.00054116733,0.07241822,0.000093345305,0.000105290084,0.000013508564,0.030924993,0.00008523504,0.0032053643,0.8436516,0.045346532,0.0035731755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015110824,0.000024984525,0.0022504325,0.000035143836,0.000011542422,0.00000548538,0.007094034,0.000004649629,0.0005740412,0.001785954,0.98795813,0.00010448653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013575798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053170044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94261163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008091004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012999747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987299726","doi":"","title":"Special Tribute: The SMU Law School and 50 Years of International Legal Education 1947-1997","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Dalhousie University; Mylan; Fordham University; Louisiana State University; Universidad de Buenos Aires; University of Miami; University of Cambridge; Yale University; Northwestern University; McKnight Foundation","keywords":"Legal education; Work (physics); International Legal English Certificate; Legislation; Legal research","score_opus":0.03571970142476256,"score_gpt":0.3526365078817119,"score_spread":0.31691680645694936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987299726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1489738,0.0000589386,0.0005318538,0.043964166,0.003780264,0.00032481214,0.00019844818,0.00004063831,0.8021271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84499925,0.00023798813,0.013940405,0.0011706831,0.006754951,0.000003415847,0.000064999615,0.000026061878,0.13280223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865705,0.00056065235,0.0001404085,0.0001911767,0.00030869804,0.0001420313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986741,0.00021415824,0.00032214902,0.00034870708,0.0003295363,0.000111367655],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018752534,0.00007750809,0.0001044448,0.0001284896,0.0019304443,0.00069186784,0.00076102413,0.00009347185,0.00074132317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029153202,0.00007866725,0.00006184316,0.00023174417,0.00057995,0.0017073599,0.00011275338,0.0005191173,0.00008151203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007381019,0.00012585116,0.0074069942,0.000004580935,0.00006034185,0.000003001878,0.0109945,8.07915e-7,0.00017176269,0.9449163,0.0065508154,0.029691255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023145643,0.00000773667,0.011243275,0.000009787846,0.00003663259,0.000001074174,0.02881327,0.0000010714447,0.00003046002,0.0013414621,0.9581962,0.000087521104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013710174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004436806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95164543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014043454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009819528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987693795","doi":"","title":"UGA SCHOOL OF LAW ENROLLS ITS LARGEST EVER FEMALE AND MINORITY CLASSES","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); White (mutation); Institution; Class (philosophy); Test (biology); Higher education; Legal education; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.07117879822801575,"score_gpt":0.3794148116118387,"score_spread":0.30823601338382295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987693795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27033874,0.0023248098,0.000011688348,0.0020377308,0.00028476436,0.00021067717,0.000022147415,0.00003979194,0.72472966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904412,0.00053413433,0.0003239543,0.00042013513,0.00008419241,0.000016053673,0.0000022937786,0.0000038703947,0.008174146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918145,0.000216312,0.00014685468,0.0001246399,0.00019207787,0.00013864021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999067,0.00038945017,0.00010088904,0.00011302437,0.00022811505,0.00010149143],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026342386,0.000058256766,0.00009175626,0.000028739749,0.0002695254,0.00010316841,0.00008552736,0.00006022046,0.001012879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003194826,0.000057173038,0.00002238575,0.00015454131,0.00014301695,0.00070030655,0.000013320928,0.00013116257,0.000037809692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012379293,0.00030499036,0.053277932,0.000053259002,0.00002586852,0.0000011736389,0.0027311868,0.0000030979877,0.00046721645,0.9302277,0.0125086075,0.00038660137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014947088,0.00001341199,0.011680272,0.000011691262,0.000020838532,9.557883e-7,0.0011361453,0.0000016038515,0.0038316874,0.0009206989,0.9821462,0.00008700789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071565825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010868442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96963763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020167348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029002308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987801986","doi":"","title":"UGA LAW STUDENTS AWARDED PRESTIGIOUS JUDICIAL CLERKSHIPS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Atlanta; Work (physics); Newspaper; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.06007416994264152,"score_gpt":0.4109810804647804,"score_spread":0.35090691052213885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987801986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2320327,0.00041802743,0.000010473328,0.00951336,0.0005898229,0.00035255394,0.00001536284,0.0002414737,0.7568262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97951555,0.00045796737,0.00013000687,0.001881542,0.0006543198,0.000051527837,0.000010503896,0.000010841289,0.017287714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985707,0.0002665554,0.0001963953,0.00018994423,0.0005231262,0.00025331747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991938,0.00028020257,0.00007208736,0.00018911413,0.00012746063,0.00013736376],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026984196,0.00008545067,0.00009996856,0.00002881732,0.00075338036,0.0004053209,0.0003674876,0.00007823037,0.0035275214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005861208,0.000088384884,0.00004250286,0.00022286411,0.00023354491,0.0006346465,0.000023578566,0.00022605811,0.00045790762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020703585,0.0018611935,0.013350395,0.000027900442,0.00014748753,0.00002123184,0.041466195,0.00017871913,0.00005915682,0.5402532,0.32831728,0.0741102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019081098,0.00001655073,0.0041611814,0.000012797719,0.000025063922,8.928209e-7,0.00059781276,0.000004994585,0.00008427935,0.0026294014,0.9921556,0.00012059057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040380232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037410965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7474829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004543303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024665904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987961813","doi":"","title":"Visiting Professor David Lepofsky '79 and Mark Persaud '91 are LSUC Honorary LLD Recipients","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pound (networking); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.0460766793066734,"score_gpt":0.37359330524487505,"score_spread":0.32751662593820163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987961813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42357063,0.000046079233,0.00012736069,0.2931642,0.0008961469,0.00022914099,0.000008207912,0.00010915022,0.2818491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8892193,0.000047258512,0.0007556833,0.0022574838,0.00037254966,0.000019416959,0.0000025078177,0.000008113764,0.107317686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893284,0.0001951217,0.00018207882,0.00021208523,0.00024271646,0.0002351866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989397,0.00045738713,0.00015397079,0.00014154396,0.00019036561,0.000117020594],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008259629,0.00007818285,0.00008703155,0.00007713295,0.00072856044,0.00021557091,0.00013648326,0.00007796134,0.0019724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015923297,0.00005598452,0.000023258192,0.00035431748,0.00013921491,0.0013934688,0.000044757904,0.00014876664,0.00023001415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061732186,0.00031510554,0.34421554,0.0000281594,0.000060288865,0.000006250536,0.052243665,6.617902e-8,0.002209923,0.25905514,0.20252718,0.13927695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032780095,0.000020389432,0.09448637,0.00008048106,0.000013133034,0.000001897439,0.032201428,0.0000027537728,0.000155937,0.0021396263,0.8703544,0.00021579996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012697134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006599583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6678272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083318584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032254288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6988034388","doi":"","title":"What, Like It's Hard?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Work (physics); Character (mathematics); Redress; Common law","score_opus":0.04109574585300888,"score_gpt":0.3434040252076554,"score_spread":0.3023082793546465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6988034388","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017189654,0.00022841364,0.00017806466,0.5941705,0.0064862017,0.0002450952,0.000015054902,0.00021156031,0.38127545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69439816,0.00054029806,0.00087660505,0.03244237,0.0015345138,0.00004961911,0.000005255933,0.000017886752,0.2701353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876225,0.00018907126,0.00019976898,0.00021255201,0.0003433298,0.00029304446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883014,0.00033085395,0.00009972596,0.0002831279,0.00023376019,0.00022236604],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006592328,0.00008517547,0.00009111806,0.000047493657,0.0006540771,0.0005338144,0.0002794426,0.000096386655,0.010772051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009835488,0.000065455555,0.000050960774,0.0003839276,0.0002260682,0.004026959,0.000028709786,0.00020570848,0.0059767915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065817408,0.00005874387,0.0006293631,0.0000022834297,0.000012627978,0.0000016712322,0.002929868,1.5620452e-7,0.0005218887,0.6366456,0.35242173,0.0067694904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016680597,0.00001112908,0.000964427,0.000033527496,0.0000069586786,8.3981246e-7,0.0033943304,2.441432e-7,0.00013715982,0.0056787673,0.98948467,0.000121135134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005713127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011292484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6772085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012471693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006406687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99479717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989997908","doi":"","title":"Class of 2014 - School of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Demotion; Subpoena; Circumstantial evidence; TSG101; Pretext","score_opus":0.07479472745692795,"score_gpt":0.3003057275988413,"score_spread":0.22551100014191333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989997908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5763297,0.000047064896,0.00018226303,0.001977685,0.00012800851,0.00010752724,0.000040555224,0.000019173189,0.421168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99496186,0.00003816841,0.0025265105,0.00009433156,0.000017551447,1.3521121e-7,0.000010601,0.000004158337,0.0023466907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902165,0.0002306893,0.0001764813,0.000119673976,0.00031492306,0.00013659215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832743,0.00015592425,0.00035552832,0.00031739238,0.00071699277,0.00012669853],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056183035,0.000064108215,0.00017073994,0.00019404216,0.00045038265,0.000034170414,0.00056235126,0.00008366124,0.0023424174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002945787,0.00008233005,0.00008105955,0.00063642306,0.0006380311,0.0028706398,0.00007760973,0.00036568404,0.00010222234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060493847,0.0004327132,0.44814378,0.000022400387,0.00010533111,0.0000024763235,0.017963637,0.0000018164135,0.00010432384,0.5226314,0.009534867,0.0009967706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030609762,0.00007558633,0.6147999,0.00001868074,0.00008161183,3.559611e-7,0.006533054,0.0000032137298,0.00006708264,0.0016198987,0.37638292,0.000111581496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05728256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07793135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5210115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046266185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005886424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990174883","doi":"","title":"Curriculum of the law school and curriculumm of the law society examinations, Osgoode Hall, Toronto.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Work (physics); Foundation (evidence); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.007594659714024624,"score_gpt":0.23165231114704005,"score_spread":0.22405765143301543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990174883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09767881,0.000040411673,0.000053637374,0.35413286,0.00044619903,0.0003843383,0.00002341986,0.00007221838,0.5471681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97628385,0.00013090017,0.00062242197,0.0009697422,0.00007081995,7.284716e-7,0.0000032517949,0.000006510818,0.021911774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883485,0.0004487017,0.000120485536,0.00015530377,0.00029002732,0.0001506397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903196,0.00018380301,0.00025278213,0.00030275944,0.000146069,0.000082631675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020741468,0.00008720495,0.000113266644,0.0000149363095,0.0008900131,0.0000770621,0.0005109671,0.00009882025,0.0004048859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018506443,0.000065213964,0.00010613582,0.00055100303,0.0006845799,0.0025754522,0.00020523851,0.00023506515,0.0000044273147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013768127,0.00008021002,0.0233835,0.000012502199,0.000017356355,5.790437e-8,0.0039307997,0.0000020886973,0.000008345782,0.8877737,0.08473493,0.00005515738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021565419,0.00001857909,0.026461795,0.000039619885,0.000048896796,7.683099e-8,0.040522855,0.000011536913,0.00041096951,0.0020914585,0.9300557,0.00012286555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3255264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017417243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8856822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083501414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037291786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.971923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990225150","doi":"","title":"Deanne Sowter: The Future of Harm Exception and Coercive Control","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Control (management); Work (physics); Do no harm","score_opus":0.01798536796244918,"score_gpt":0.3106686172155435,"score_spread":0.2926832492530943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990225150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4586364,0.0022183342,0.00029373606,0.40928602,0.0036413975,0.0010587926,0.00014232779,0.00011878746,0.12460419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99083054,0.00006794504,0.00007267197,0.005362949,0.00060869526,0.00006204208,0.000009845484,0.000005452604,0.0029798455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890125,0.00039560333,0.00015720163,0.00011771649,0.00029371737,0.00013451769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993112,0.00021071787,0.00013995166,0.0001418647,0.00013099525,0.000065272354],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009795334,0.000055316166,0.00008341752,0.000030198391,0.0013372422,0.0001097418,0.00017893288,0.00003445636,0.00352408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015671243,0.000046147943,0.00003213682,0.00032607952,0.00019280535,0.0003868329,0.000035024463,0.00037466967,0.00003364791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042257165,0.000095324685,0.0029989367,0.000005914639,0.000027439226,8.780868e-7,0.016898667,0.000020842024,0.000351247,0.93057907,0.04337068,0.005608768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028313138,0.000031074353,0.004092242,0.0000021094559,0.000018700222,0.0000017958109,0.022100542,0.0000091146885,0.000021138265,0.0053781504,0.968,0.00006198233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054031634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003221396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9252009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063411964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027079333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990551016","doi":"","title":"Don't Go to Lawyers for Moral Guidance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Disposition; Moral character; Character (mathematics); Moral authority; Good moral character; Aside","score_opus":0.06308300082928,"score_gpt":0.38046062902860617,"score_spread":0.31737762819932613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990551016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025154142,0.00006498836,0.00061979657,0.5261829,0.0047109714,0.0022398555,0.00008526391,0.00041330946,0.44052878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9365667,0.000021956046,0.0050091017,0.0264182,0.0010631717,0.0016291615,0.00023694908,0.00005221651,0.029002557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997375,0.00030351928,0.0004328084,0.00051793375,0.0007975243,0.00057319354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981953,0.0005256191,0.00022635364,0.00037764624,0.00040638732,0.00026869075],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016576876,0.00020118452,0.00020316687,0.00026895117,0.0044501354,0.0004061044,0.000640757,0.00006448602,0.010333512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016176655,0.00024239045,0.00012469299,0.0016632803,0.00022164827,0.0011531642,0.00009908109,0.00038932473,0.00049472955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014785046,0.00025035217,0.0016267663,0.000015621194,0.000077785684,0.0000017175307,0.029063737,0.0007207621,0.0011749475,0.86344093,0.076454185,0.027025374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044402631,0.00009706647,0.0009870696,0.000004369643,0.000032215852,0.000002652665,0.0154838,0.00003168158,0.000037562782,0.0048772586,0.9776661,0.00033622008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018566704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018822079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91141254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086156104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012617763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99684596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990768626","doi":"","title":"Enduring Hierachies in American Legal Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University at Buffalo; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Hamline University; University of Toronto; University of Louisville; St. Thomas University; Louisiana State University; University of Oklahoma; University of Memphis; University of South Dakota; University of Denver; University of the Pacific; Santa Clara University; University of Oregon; University of South Carolina; St. John's University; University of Cincinnati; Pennsylvania State University; Drexel University; University of Akron; University of Wyoming; Ohio State University; University of St. Thomas; Syracuse University; University of Pittsburgh; University of Pennsylvania; George Washington University; University of La Verne; Tulane University; State University of New York; Case Western Reserve University; University of Minnesota; University of Washington; University of Dayton; Villanova University; Harvard University; George Mason University; York University; Northwestern University; University of Missouri; Yeshiva University; Texas Tech University; Marquette University; Emory University; Valparaiso University; Baylor University; University of Montana; Florida State University; Yale University","keywords":"Categorization; Hierarchy; Legal education; Ranking (information retrieval); Empirical legal studies; Legal profession; Legal research; Legal opinion","score_opus":0.01688064246569535,"score_gpt":0.33141952992036133,"score_spread":0.31453888745466596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990768626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42952007,0.000045742072,0.00006258434,0.03983384,0.0010423862,0.00014392477,0.0000012488123,0.00008583521,0.5292644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837135,0.000022395498,0.001462106,0.004563804,0.0008425037,0.000046039066,0.00000875393,0.000009617881,0.009331284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988011,0.00031819317,0.00021334953,0.00018625884,0.000236395,0.0002447162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992162,0.00021058877,0.00012995384,0.0001939075,0.000114240225,0.00013512615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008209408,0.0000797333,0.00010817239,0.0001246159,0.00047399398,0.0003426026,0.00019724114,0.000045405326,0.0005676918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013610701,0.00008785336,0.000029414894,0.0007641924,0.00022715049,0.0012527698,0.000018926648,0.00038092906,0.0003859739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004291193,0.00011855359,0.012152553,0.000003992682,0.0000033336505,2.3840487e-7,0.0031099431,0.00000766337,0.000096369644,0.96374375,0.004137307,0.016621996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000851503,0.000013707633,0.02118913,0.000013664461,0.0000037812956,7.2013796e-7,0.0054053874,0.000008106402,0.000075185824,0.003367447,0.96972823,0.00010947898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12068817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07163701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96559095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016522525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008576456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9453032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990954803","doi":"","title":"Everyday Legal Problems and the Cost of Justice in Canada: Gender (Data Report)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sample (material); Legal action; Everyday life; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.08525038480529805,"score_gpt":0.35585363994447056,"score_spread":0.2706032551391725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990954803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11108479,0.00060102367,0.00008104503,0.16487302,0.0030261518,0.001145087,0.00008867751,0.000026271016,0.71907395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444246,0.00007647146,0.00015701394,0.001242156,0.0002136271,0.000020033362,0.000013974153,0.0000051209418,0.0038291572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880564,0.00018883764,0.00029488144,0.00019491612,0.0003341505,0.0001815842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820805,0.00034982138,0.0003727096,0.00080841634,0.00017268244,0.00008832887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002220477,0.00006343956,0.00012578841,0.000019820813,0.00096983934,0.0003450776,0.00063522893,0.000042227344,0.00023490787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004978656,0.000049507737,0.000012269475,0.00013378981,0.0004311649,0.0013733605,0.00012903787,0.00032293738,0.000008704756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033333028,0.000054332217,0.029544385,0.000042106956,0.000033693224,0.000033292552,0.0043594115,0.000026672209,0.000015483849,0.9188615,0.045764137,0.0012316469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044152158,0.0000022109828,0.035098825,0.000015963164,0.0000340484,0.000009654225,0.0037678543,0.00005780057,0.000008159331,0.0015085541,0.9589712,0.00008421918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.917353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014923254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045479513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.806787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991122825","doi":"","title":"Five Osgoode alumni – Sue-Lynn Noel ’01, Jessica Clogg ’97, Lorne MacLean ’82, John Struthers ’83 and Peter Sankoff ’05 LLM – made this year’s Canadian Lawyer Top 25 list","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice","score_opus":0.027549567000737497,"score_gpt":0.29779814920064057,"score_spread":0.27024858219990305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991122825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055340976,0.00026637435,0.000022793422,0.2247148,0.0014362333,0.0005421824,0.00019319357,0.00018459892,0.71729887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92737794,0.000088971654,0.0015873185,0.036896307,0.0013022939,0.000033296088,0.00007468334,0.000044952143,0.03259425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768174,0.00034885207,0.0003681663,0.00052629184,0.0004218506,0.00065312797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771196,0.00026181532,0.00018415427,0.0003525293,0.00021284288,0.001276715],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062028994,0.00024026503,0.00026190744,0.00010600209,0.001070645,0.00082248845,0.0004701483,0.0002437825,0.015344561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013497914,0.00025155282,0.00008855763,0.0007433299,0.00042752724,0.0010556753,0.00007624947,0.00085293595,0.0017831037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048133483,0.00010912366,0.004597402,0.000039472492,0.00010394564,0.00003490236,0.03437907,0.000006807492,0.0003071475,0.37220442,0.58424944,0.0039201677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038399833,0.000058794933,0.0023568107,0.00002175053,0.00004809088,0.0000028868365,0.009019193,0.000029521661,0.000117454736,0.00097568455,0.98664206,0.00034375902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5758938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6205359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87203693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027086184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017324362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995245904","doi":"","title":"In Brief","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Gray (unit); Graduation (instrument); Legal education; Higher education; Schedule; Commission","score_opus":0.04606120803671844,"score_gpt":0.4277609520632667,"score_spread":0.38169974402654827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995245904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018953245,0.0000027662047,0.00010854911,0.2542037,0.00016458132,0.000024468418,5.780539e-8,0.00001378399,0.7265288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755535,0.000005580709,0.00082806504,0.0062752394,0.000076660464,0.0000025287557,2.5643186e-7,7.681972e-7,0.01725737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980277,0.0000149207735,0.00004063728,0.00003061869,0.000057142806,0.00005393376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998966,0.000025611522,0.00000871949,0.000028297614,0.000023783394,0.000016985676],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019363778,0.000010230574,0.000013129988,0.000028819966,0.00007329722,0.000037581845,0.000035168498,0.000014389092,0.0021934842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026142597,0.000010059896,0.0000041993594,0.00032830998,0.000025625766,0.0004375962,0.000002104049,0.00005529993,0.00024528842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.5136765e-7,0.00002307951,0.00034766787,1.09578686e-7,2.0854411e-7,3.0698254e-7,0.007909903,0.0000029353382,0.000008637875,0.9870741,0.004245661,0.00038717056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006704946,0.0000014001287,0.0020834326,6.3751753e-7,1.9957058e-7,1.1768943e-7,0.003318244,1.242625e-7,0.000041154624,0.033451423,0.96101844,0.000017761213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042486638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022225317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9567728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048064343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040613653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995512423","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Students Shine a Light on Freedom of Expression","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Event (particle physics); Civil liberties; Bridge (graph theory); Legal education","score_opus":0.02510102329302714,"score_gpt":0.3432802927986756,"score_spread":0.31817926950564845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995512423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47942728,0.00006878862,0.000034006007,0.03571403,0.0011417122,0.00048912666,0.000007145356,0.00009221096,0.4830257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98419034,0.000018441422,0.00079601776,0.001736929,0.00039501558,0.000055935514,0.0000064045958,0.000009728991,0.01279121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985793,0.00018259163,0.00025551175,0.00017579731,0.00060405926,0.00020270362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894255,0.00018708984,0.00017021276,0.00027944264,0.00025343505,0.00016727133],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049539417,0.000087673456,0.000121217236,0.000061269304,0.00038832158,0.00025949694,0.00040531144,0.00009161517,0.006638732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007973717,0.00007651574,0.000044336542,0.0003796792,0.000104798535,0.0010142621,0.000048517064,0.00029902326,0.001564985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030615956,0.001011077,0.019403309,0.000018186316,0.000035774505,0.0000014930737,0.011854394,0.000017174467,0.014146182,0.7339642,0.21843915,0.0010784615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053400657,0.000086896944,0.017649116,0.00009637457,0.000013919589,3.5001045e-7,0.004019329,0.00000502051,0.0057052784,0.008588126,0.9630899,0.00021171909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034045152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004276789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7446507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006399276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019385084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995517388","doi":"","title":"Ontario student group wants fair pay mandated for those in Law Practice Program","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Legislation; Work (physics); Confidentiality","score_opus":0.06729412546603161,"score_gpt":0.4110294865592738,"score_spread":0.3437353610932422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995517388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098698355,0.00018801403,0.00020538876,0.08675546,0.0037039616,0.0040204963,0.000026617134,0.00040465823,0.8059971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9609515,0.00001598804,0.011689562,0.0069575924,0.00052116136,0.00069703464,0.000087739914,0.000022954726,0.019056434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794066,0.00037916488,0.0003745041,0.00031830918,0.0005609955,0.00042636352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982091,0.00040955638,0.00021635585,0.00027226776,0.0005779412,0.00031473197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027695196,0.00013907734,0.00017366956,0.00006175992,0.00051609677,0.0007158091,0.00034964437,0.00013958568,0.00042629332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017196084,0.00012054733,0.000049692597,0.00057421246,0.00020885067,0.002637054,0.00004987611,0.0006013301,0.00041822708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014131718,0.0016416579,0.007526625,0.000009103843,0.000041693394,0.000009971378,0.034992065,0.000005302268,0.000011337297,0.926381,0.025213322,0.004026626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092916493,0.00014572473,0.0023925148,0.000021282425,0.000026483309,0.0000018078186,0.015436622,0.0000040478385,0.000014709342,0.004122327,0.97672015,0.00018516832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42211714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8498827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95150685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007087361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016605244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6902564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995529163","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Hall Law School: First in Canada in Experiential Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Curriculum; Experiential education; Legal education; Scope (computer science); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.024424707140857302,"score_gpt":0.317610207857738,"score_spread":0.2931855007168807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995529163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33604696,0.0004823533,0.0000067219867,0.027934989,0.0044753184,0.00039616105,0.000008508718,0.000043642547,0.63060534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98934126,0.000030949905,0.00035503978,0.005807052,0.0008963736,0.0001399289,0.000025561498,0.000014062643,0.0033897941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826723,0.00024239166,0.00036316653,0.00021479632,0.0004023551,0.00051003776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989556,0.00016291968,0.0001245705,0.0002556199,0.00012532537,0.00037593508],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073372474,0.00012169358,0.00013791498,0.000093966046,0.00045966433,0.0002125821,0.0002719259,0.000100743775,0.0036884951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000807996,0.00013957302,0.000028237857,0.00078128814,0.00010309481,0.0022305818,0.00003307323,0.0005142373,0.00033093992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011518087,0.00030278388,0.0980274,0.000009355016,0.000005134071,0.0000012796346,0.0090367645,0.000014238267,0.000024606275,0.8639518,0.02815213,0.00046299663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002266393,0.000005131946,0.024974557,0.000031430158,0.0000043348614,0.0000010684001,0.015798429,0.0000032610712,0.00009088911,0.0017562294,0.9569102,0.00019781513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99834776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9287581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015541344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007434512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995617627","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Visiting Faculty Collaborate with Students and Put Law into Action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; The arts; Residence; Creativity; Narrative; Mentorship","score_opus":0.042536338567792174,"score_gpt":0.38174361209158897,"score_spread":0.3392072735237968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995617627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81242156,0.000034748286,0.00005268236,0.02155258,0.0003011296,0.00041922485,0.0000061935043,0.000111980524,0.16509987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98858565,0.000019564402,0.0017773374,0.0030715636,0.00029210455,0.00006968461,0.000018008155,0.000011384213,0.006154674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879366,0.00016475937,0.00017533735,0.0002176208,0.0004214287,0.00022717328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895805,0.00010419012,0.00014576188,0.00013890845,0.00045143496,0.00020163055],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047934245,0.0001008851,0.00010434922,0.000035275956,0.0012452523,0.0015661737,0.00016806947,0.00007884305,0.0006830494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022413128,0.000090027155,0.0000137594325,0.00055778166,0.00019448673,0.0024605696,0.00003702475,0.0002894657,0.00045966846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026715381,0.00016581627,0.033882946,0.000022250073,0.00006272396,0.000002370617,0.013355599,0.000009512276,0.0009520796,0.9385325,0.009857674,0.0031298539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006636493,0.000072198054,0.022542357,0.000045859237,0.000031614934,0.0000026684263,0.029757436,0.000013966959,0.0004891941,0.008124055,0.9379392,0.00031777692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1370449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07034664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9304084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012197083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027606398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996870138","doi":"","title":"Teaching and learning in Canadian legal education: an empirical exploration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socratic method; Teaching method; Empirical research; Legal education; Legal research; Focus (optics); Order (exchange); Socratic questioning","score_opus":0.05503584505597889,"score_gpt":0.3688873549312066,"score_spread":0.3138515098752277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996870138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5056538,0.00006988791,5.619223e-8,0.0011514412,0.0013720708,0.00034220144,0.000027039643,0.000097809054,0.49128568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9324358,0.00010558538,0.0007439907,0.0012859779,0.00022790238,0.00016476866,0.0009718728,0.0000717129,0.0639924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544305,0.0021416312,0.00060457544,0.0006828573,0.0004934887,0.0006344074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781024,0.00028209065,0.00039679074,0.00029326882,0.00048731608,0.00073025975],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003694816,0.00033839216,0.00030380272,0.0009601408,0.0047413297,0.00048722912,0.0003744072,0.00068880466,0.00062167994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048681283,0.00041766075,0.00006608121,0.0008312193,0.00007719984,0.006093232,0.00002199178,0.004407703,0.00013761633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034372126,0.00026099445,0.000700545,0.000045954355,0.000022338334,0.000008060974,0.0044084187,0.0000036402125,0.00015163518,0.6152806,0.000043509805,0.3790399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015052385,0.000056641118,0.004006881,0.00011484834,0.000041068364,0.0000050457443,0.034836527,0.000008440413,0.00006665676,0.014424643,0.94576097,0.0005277654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88406074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97313005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94571745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012377655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039522736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996949540","doi":"","title":"The Ten Evidence ‘Rules’ That Every Family Law Lawyer Needs to Know","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Hearsay; Family law; Irony; Bit (key); Federal Rules of Evidence","score_opus":0.051832510793772824,"score_gpt":0.34481167842589955,"score_spread":0.2929791676321267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996949540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049423084,0.0010224392,0.00021391586,0.40636796,0.0026768576,0.00053845457,0.000018576013,0.00022146714,0.5395172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8940667,0.00041941614,0.00043582378,0.021978311,0.0009032527,0.00009656546,0.0000015630221,0.000018804963,0.08207956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979874,0.00038925942,0.0002590949,0.0002597923,0.0006242788,0.00048015793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682796,0.0018380438,0.00012935944,0.0005313231,0.000353569,0.00031972412],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018562211,0.00014044579,0.00012805998,0.00006024711,0.001908808,0.0007937491,0.00071427313,0.00011526229,0.000981996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022898735,0.000086738764,0.00007469857,0.0007161546,0.00043926176,0.0023336262,0.00009423797,0.00030476216,0.0059202737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018384366,0.000027866563,0.001557988,0.0000022241818,0.000013087148,9.96023e-7,0.002030469,4.904654e-7,0.0007369527,0.8629077,0.1280266,0.0046772426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103658625,0.000019671503,0.0028239884,0.0000897785,0.000012004118,8.903633e-7,0.0033662708,2.8024957e-7,0.00025480016,0.0053979224,0.98775893,0.00017182033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019776495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023285229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85973233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021534933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006971048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997141549","doi":"","title":"UGA SCHOOL OF LAW ENROLLS A SUPERIOR CLASS","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Quarter (Canadian coin); Test (biology); Point (geometry); School class","score_opus":0.08928111805872678,"score_gpt":0.36603121923667303,"score_spread":0.27675010117794624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997141549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05108674,0.0009744152,0.000014175152,0.012293973,0.0003202026,0.00018631034,0.000016239263,0.00007186833,0.93503606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853915,0.00035943254,0.00024651072,0.0009425325,0.00018850555,0.00002521907,0.000001908506,0.000005545448,0.012838838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923384,0.00012881118,0.0001655621,0.000102135826,0.00022944222,0.00014020622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992268,0.00027356297,0.00008278937,0.00014955431,0.00017341165,0.000093885814],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013696853,0.00005023279,0.000084583124,0.00003348796,0.00023767693,0.00010465353,0.00015672915,0.000051954485,0.0068730544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014614896,0.000049230497,0.00003776877,0.00018740461,0.00018698438,0.0006146414,0.000015779471,0.00013704073,0.00025156033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022066308,0.00066679966,0.0041649095,0.000037237933,0.000049210335,0.0000028754766,0.022054875,0.000017967632,0.0011866431,0.8153543,0.14995798,0.0064851493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011139293,0.000013695471,0.000538796,0.000010655379,0.00001181957,5.377351e-7,0.0011370148,0.000022814109,0.000912984,0.00045384094,0.99672085,0.00006561589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013104508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069549703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9343048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030323179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010668444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997205244","doi":"","title":"Transnational Legal Practice in a North American Common Market","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UF Law Scholarship Repository (University of Florida)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Single market; Legislation; Common law; Legal practice; Government (linguistics); Globalization; Liability; Context (archaeology); Negotiation","score_opus":0.017924688902772535,"score_gpt":0.28919730532076704,"score_spread":0.2712726164179945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997205244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7218372,0.000019060148,0.000017277192,0.046625674,0.0005320267,0.00016101626,0.000016511694,0.000040678115,0.23075055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957036,0.0000061391383,0.00087215554,0.00081114296,0.00006975568,0.000002251379,0.000014775454,0.0000061645583,0.0025140208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763024,0.0010724441,0.00016300217,0.00020874434,0.0007413561,0.00018421732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861115,0.00057959737,0.00028126425,0.00018381039,0.0002494199,0.00009477091],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012999289,0.000073350486,0.0001357562,0.00014344588,0.0019385465,0.000099177545,0.0004352504,0.000032428892,0.0004285814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021258905,0.00011165301,0.0000632183,0.0015405833,0.00038734058,0.0026677037,0.000059817685,0.00083025004,0.0000036166266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003921557,0.00052510423,0.08370937,0.00000957743,0.000055674423,0.00014594269,0.039657455,0.00015667366,0.00013449068,0.872604,0.0017445744,0.00086498546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025769562,0.000055436067,0.17170177,0.0000015542037,0.000025705878,0.000013448463,0.03750764,0.000017426795,0.000011096167,0.0001076754,0.7901818,0.00011875401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016672162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04090931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8724963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037003637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008312164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997212049","doi":"","title":"The Unintended Benefits of Innovation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Referral; Gateway (web page); Unintended consequences; Legislation","score_opus":0.05455856331276578,"score_gpt":0.3357523395862343,"score_spread":0.28119377627346853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997212049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06661233,0.00020116963,0.00014792089,0.502092,0.0008147705,0.00028387678,0.000012008693,0.00010743522,0.4297285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893237,0.00004792372,0.00034283864,0.0074919267,0.00038884068,0.000011576171,0.000009679326,0.000006164574,0.002377381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904567,0.00012434662,0.0002943326,0.00010882026,0.0002806057,0.00014622121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986419,0.00022731879,0.00020336444,0.00013870848,0.0007133497,0.00007536967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006988816,0.000053237658,0.00007029378,0.000028481689,0.0006731118,0.00015958649,0.00025426634,0.000052186362,0.0005131763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004057537,0.0000433428,0.000021341684,0.0017162723,0.00027116324,0.0005131494,0.000024853458,0.00026129617,0.00018544399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009595353,0.000015817286,0.00040489502,0.0000025838442,0.000008405931,8.4029104e-8,0.0028931457,0.000008741213,0.00018912784,0.97803783,0.015802385,0.0026273779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010517381,0.000019409212,0.0012604252,0.0000058053156,0.000005805545,1.5264337e-7,0.0042666285,0.000010226768,0.0006444638,0.0062992936,0.9873235,0.00005909426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034750947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025974947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9717386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034131193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052251515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5618921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998526554","doi":"","title":"2010 Academy of Law Alumni Fellows Dinner and Induction Ceremony Program","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Ceremony; Work (physics); Higher education","score_opus":0.07516377893102544,"score_gpt":0.42778231512676784,"score_spread":0.3526185361957424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998526554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44046512,0.000008102219,0.000008230553,0.08969129,0.0008393692,0.00025254005,0.0000011764923,0.000077351026,0.4686568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98092854,0.000016367265,0.003643011,0.0009350954,0.00028945762,0.00001709548,0.0000020630273,0.0000039812276,0.014164368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994564,0.00004626801,0.00013327319,0.000102529986,0.00015167157,0.00010985575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962604,0.00007710991,0.00008262511,0.000056488283,0.0000925473,0.00006521471],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005031708,0.00004283346,0.000055644403,0.00004353339,0.00027317775,0.00009353306,0.000077696386,0.00013770415,0.0012748931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021747766,0.000037241323,0.000015192857,0.00026957074,0.00033876105,0.00072350417,0.000013564578,0.00041590736,0.000029354356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002397267,0.00010685271,0.0011197205,0.0000028180443,0.000005575109,2.6381942e-8,0.0040575275,6.3943794e-8,0.0046556694,0.9474279,0.010945013,0.031676404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006502817,0.000011386771,0.005853844,0.000001394081,0.000006923092,8.361578e-7,0.0015728906,0.000006888032,0.0012643557,0.0049782875,0.9861815,0.000056682253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009151673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039679096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9752365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007828387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010800677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998825840","doi":"","title":"A better understanding of how to become a lawyer in Canada: regulations and implementation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Legal profession; Process (computing); Minor (academic); Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Civil procedure; Legal education","score_opus":0.014211320240135033,"score_gpt":0.2636225276519949,"score_spread":0.24941120741185988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998825840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7901399,0.00011621694,0.000024867582,0.13010058,0.00062268105,0.0008784788,0.000032394968,0.000056054578,0.07802882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956136,0.000062529776,0.00063610706,0.0019630522,0.00025606982,0.000051147203,0.000039899103,0.000013923105,0.0013637264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987926,0.000121693185,0.00022326618,0.00019021692,0.00020844644,0.000463795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994089,0.00022975447,0.00010528321,0.00011233089,0.000035441866,0.00010828213],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033156574,0.000053456584,0.000118837685,0.00004921337,0.00038742184,0.00060214626,0.00013582526,0.000049595397,0.020778675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000651851,0.00009954804,0.00001794623,0.0009781139,0.00006683386,0.0013733585,0.000038487764,0.00036097565,7.7102084e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043998034,0.000029348506,0.2303665,0.0000062080726,0.000017938006,0.0000025858444,0.0013073698,0.000010023965,0.000008354587,0.6060881,0.15380314,0.008356047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004965927,0.00005787469,0.09586718,0.000041370982,0.000016434857,0.000009297729,0.0054036244,0.000077052326,0.000007843072,0.46252394,0.43522328,0.0002755059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94719326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99984515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28142014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003113014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004640783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9801165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998931863","doi":"","title":"Building Community Connections: The Second Interim Report of the WellCoMs Mobile Van Project","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Service (business); Foundation (evidence); Rural area; Community service; Rural community","score_opus":0.044148573885585234,"score_gpt":0.36774709434994046,"score_spread":0.3235985204643552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998931863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6898373,0.000042706644,0.000026577887,0.0077570546,0.0015292594,0.0006838727,0.00000949038,0.00004427184,0.30006948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715941,0.000005637717,0.00022813953,0.0016732592,0.00016077624,0.00007662591,0.0000037598202,0.0000087029875,0.026248993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819505,0.00092450826,0.00032252265,0.00012484688,0.00026294816,0.000170118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997936,0.0007247423,0.00033519766,0.0007122587,0.00025068945,0.000041101754],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024922295,0.00008040714,0.00011647642,0.000036477624,0.0014437238,0.00020058756,0.00058855943,0.00007066988,0.0036270602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011500184,0.000052914897,0.00008241839,0.0006697261,0.00034215927,0.00059602153,0.000110342175,0.00090132793,0.0001242482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015541136,0.00029912306,0.010178536,0.000042467225,0.000071993534,0.0000010775095,0.025845258,0.000027505039,0.0025493235,0.9326437,0.02757242,0.0007530561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095481555,0.000027595832,0.0012334563,0.000024989271,0.000010443471,0.000011735486,0.02441492,0.000004607552,0.0010943715,0.0041807164,0.9688263,0.00007538211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039039362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023239248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9412539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098076714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006801377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999055950","doi":"","title":"Canadian Association for Legal Ethics presents two awards: Best Paper Award to Adjunct Professor Jennifer Leitch ’09 (LLM), ’16 (PhD) &amp; Lifetime Achievement Award to Distinguished Research Professor Allan Hutchinson","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjunct; Association (psychology); Legal ethics","score_opus":0.09061047706418816,"score_gpt":0.42954877025784255,"score_spread":0.33893829319365437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999055950","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24457385,0.000033476776,0.000081625585,0.6465067,0.005182112,0.0062062866,0.00028827589,0.00014910162,0.096978515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6302678,0.000013570115,0.001773817,0.013133661,0.0024067783,0.0012328312,0.00029508243,0.00008734744,0.3507891],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99155045,0.002267626,0.0008381647,0.0009871561,0.002537667,0.001818947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918437,0.0020880704,0.0003480156,0.00088045205,0.0033316293,0.0015081309],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013747676,0.00037755002,0.00047841144,0.00043852173,0.003174387,0.0014055149,0.0011097023,0.00058602693,0.0013909092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023145169,0.00038820386,0.00016522082,0.0017607539,0.00010948516,0.0014147464,0.00022709169,0.0026031274,0.0061125085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037833446,0.0011349304,0.108572386,0.00020586548,0.00032051952,0.0000050849185,0.04623235,0.00010055583,0.00092244265,0.26216558,0.57883835,0.001123618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008419036,0.00020683,0.0072751073,0.0001476716,0.000044244065,4.9540023e-7,0.0055926396,0.0000075773405,0.000090336995,0.0016128323,0.9836693,0.0005111007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73032457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94859195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6333731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044757305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008513864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999357151","doi":"","title":"Citation on His Excellency Hon. Mwai Kibaki on his Conferment of the Honorary Doctors of Law (LLD) of the University of Nairobi, Kenya","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Nairobi Research Archive (University of Nairobi)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Term (time); Citation analysis","score_opus":0.07373551707807996,"score_gpt":0.3076221877711467,"score_spread":0.23388667069306673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999357151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089765996,0.00013350592,0.00027502517,0.00823818,0.0006267815,0.002185385,0.0021779707,0.000038233324,0.89655894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7403317,0.0012101779,0.0007957487,0.000048271904,0.000071981405,1.490768e-7,0.00016290908,0.000032207787,0.25734687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942491,0.0021614183,0.00046324995,0.00054589845,0.0020328634,0.00054748816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925342,0.0021418317,0.0020680306,0.0011315424,0.0018753532,0.00024900865],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019745538,0.0003346349,0.0008360098,0.001247626,0.0015476239,0.000012385135,0.0028325678,0.00046161748,0.0016605224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040930518,0.00035851283,0.0007707646,0.0014072936,0.008041739,0.00067667454,0.00095712004,0.0015430502,0.00002507366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022214658,0.0027102216,0.0014139108,0.0013035465,0.0008915996,0.0000147114815,0.16067398,0.00024813256,0.0037901883,0.6459779,0.17845759,0.0022967723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028918837,0.0011012348,0.025294412,0.0021939708,0.000532124,0.0000016112452,0.08843228,0.000039643277,0.00086094916,0.0067301965,0.87130517,0.0006165509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035381895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010193375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69284755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009461144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046949564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999578164","doi":"","title":"Current trends in Canadian civil justice system reform : manufactured simplicity or equitable access?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Economic Justice; Disadvantage; Civil society; Equity (law); Context (archaeology); Inequality","score_opus":0.07320641961911371,"score_gpt":0.3822552198874809,"score_spread":0.3090488002683672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999578164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021464733,0.00023304464,0.000054596705,0.1272186,0.002182041,0.00039210034,0.00010231548,0.00022638193,0.8481262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901874,0.000030559768,0.000071882154,0.0063024564,0.00082962547,0.00004887977,0.000049447593,0.000015207342,0.00246451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796844,0.00020006455,0.00036959397,0.00033277823,0.00038360828,0.00074549165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984033,0.00011559853,0.00015252238,0.00024257436,0.00015809707,0.00092792226],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008333357,0.00015169125,0.00020398505,0.00018424424,0.0009510153,0.0007283815,0.0006142765,0.00013046613,0.004369221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074885605,0.00013657605,0.00004869837,0.0018307451,0.00007898956,0.0018279534,0.00007471672,0.0006758804,0.0004099168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008154408,0.0001239418,0.0031758256,0.00026097076,0.000029910436,0.00003131531,0.010829736,0.0000750502,0.000021236738,0.855661,0.11950861,0.010200886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024840236,0.00001982368,0.0035578553,0.00003803283,0.00003839365,0.0000012383326,0.008440446,0.000079057485,0.00003359,0.00017987714,0.9871581,0.00020514015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.915861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9687227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023741121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025694147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000516844","doi":"","title":"Family Legal Services Review Submission on Unbundling &amp; Legal Coaching","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coaching; Unbundling; Economic Justice; Practice of law; Service (business); Legal service; Legal practice; Work (physics); Vetting","score_opus":0.07335737450307632,"score_gpt":0.36176311099616837,"score_spread":0.28840573649309204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000516844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79576296,0.00053423503,0.00002941573,0.049648788,0.000668189,0.00031336426,0.000021621254,0.00008476895,0.15293667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716458,0.0010972231,0.00097242923,0.002284263,0.00022682507,6.4593877e-7,0.00004274486,0.000017631592,0.023712493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976146,0.00049387646,0.00024401829,0.00042225837,0.0008323923,0.0003928545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975104,0.00023629866,0.0007207384,0.00083709613,0.00042149753,0.0002740155],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027290815,0.00018864928,0.00031025885,0.00019960088,0.006342127,0.000516828,0.001398589,0.0002161593,0.001038971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011564292,0.00022541745,0.00017744944,0.00036729607,0.0003629947,0.0050151423,0.00024030558,0.0009345615,0.0005287535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015709106,0.0024522056,0.4125426,0.0037156015,0.0006983463,0.00017097761,0.07139975,0.00010260889,0.022049751,0.3904948,0.040789343,0.054013096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043247832,0.000035181532,0.10608823,0.0010704689,0.00008719709,0.0000032012495,0.0038518414,0.000005077078,0.000069518144,0.00028952523,0.8877859,0.0002813614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015193084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010195394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8469966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023174477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006610667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000577396","doi":"","title":"100% of first-gen and veteran students receive scholarship aid","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Value (mathematics); Legal education; Class (philosophy); Quarter (Canadian coin); Higher education","score_opus":0.04690689058789104,"score_gpt":0.36279183275649746,"score_spread":0.3158849421686064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000577396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89236027,0.00027575006,0.0000034171794,0.017391464,0.0007951974,0.00029060178,0.0000281715,0.00004871291,0.088806406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927398,0.000055940163,0.0002928642,0.0018234672,0.00015544088,0.000053702817,0.00001182881,0.000009498003,0.0048574447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983616,0.00041148879,0.00022997966,0.0001945332,0.00060965645,0.00019275205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991089,0.0002474187,0.00015553174,0.00020020398,0.00014931631,0.000138626],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015011154,0.00007524301,0.000115170114,0.000073705705,0.001445391,0.00023380204,0.00038772018,0.000045903096,0.0038301868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082167005,0.00008520526,0.000035119218,0.00055490446,0.0001476654,0.0008193103,0.00009729041,0.0005073633,0.00006989932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011862638,0.0006938738,0.45694646,0.000039355786,0.000119191325,0.000009032902,0.051540233,0.00002754093,0.000540893,0.47054803,0.016753854,0.0026629241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035277987,0.00008093075,0.01947336,0.000010203229,0.000016974254,0.0000018837251,0.007842333,0.0000011048037,0.00008126249,0.00391668,0.9681058,0.00011671633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010125157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00477435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95135194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012834875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002756073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001399396","doi":"","title":"Inspiring national indigenous legal education for Aotearoa New Zealand's Bachelor of Laws Degree: Phase One","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Research Commons (University of Waikato)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department of Education and Training; University of Toronto; Dalhousie University; Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; McGill University; Australian Government; Charles Sturt University; University of Oxford; University of Waikato","keywords":"Aotearoa; Bachelor; Indigenous; Foundation (evidence); Phase (matter); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.34434488996840457,"score_gpt":0.5010587851177175,"score_spread":0.15671389514931294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001399396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027470047,0.0010696909,0.00026777963,0.08422587,0.0013936566,0.0021247645,0.0007667886,0.00009739488,0.882584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3553504,0.001202562,0.004403374,0.000051794894,0.0012469891,0.0000142095205,0.0009178372,0.000053773707,0.63675904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960534,0.0003817988,0.00032968787,0.0003407331,0.0024831533,0.00041122435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925041,0.0010145425,0.00039455996,0.00031009503,0.005518291,0.00025841867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005234497,0.00014125103,0.00035385485,0.0014315472,0.00085265865,0.00016466298,0.000753621,0.00036110572,0.00079570623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002762704,0.00018688507,0.00019285746,0.0021008148,0.00053777103,0.00074930914,0.00017557191,0.0012648801,0.00005715644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012629028,0.0014273952,0.00013296942,0.0004613702,0.00031884896,0.000005030527,0.035846535,0.000002558709,0.0001856597,0.0736822,0.7498372,0.13797393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039961157,0.00012971321,0.00033559752,0.00026978564,0.000082289254,0.0000034026652,0.010237523,0.000007368296,0.000051965366,0.008108796,0.9802107,0.00016320197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2145007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043989975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32788035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001429474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07697648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9734547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001582509","doi":"","title":"Learning in Lockdown: Assessing the Impact of Online Legal Education on the Development of Professional Competencies and Identity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socialization; Legal education; Legal research; Identity (music); Legal profession; Curriculum; Session (web analytics); Term (time)","score_opus":0.04049584936110116,"score_gpt":0.41980390360017,"score_spread":0.3793080542390688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001582509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.971073,0.00018229555,0.000024355573,0.015306382,0.00039876488,0.00015084313,0.0000023310304,0.000014720828,0.0128473295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976618,0.000012161893,0.0004889209,0.00017956675,0.00011130572,0.000012824841,0.00000826557,0.0000040569103,0.0015210899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989428,0.0003214762,0.00025143972,0.00009794052,0.00028430964,0.00010202717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989786,0.00064028584,0.00012005837,0.00008102437,0.0001484522,0.00003159322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016011351,0.000057546942,0.000076676224,0.00006744693,0.00050989806,0.00026536066,0.00014123612,0.00003718491,0.0002530701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009148028,0.000033342338,0.000028959943,0.00057326216,0.00018388237,0.000947365,0.000031994594,0.0004683408,0.000008983446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011483315,0.0004894544,0.037194364,0.000056843957,0.000045549896,4.101869e-7,0.051643096,0.00014484282,0.0018120551,0.891788,0.0018629106,0.014950983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013359771,0.00005191377,0.74315906,0.0006759343,0.000017613767,0.000002141241,0.120050766,0.00034574972,0.00053936994,0.0054756864,0.12937738,0.00017079397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0103956405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010484505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8863123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012634437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004472317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99619424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001714122","doi":"","title":"Lawyer Ghuna Bdiwi Who Fought for Freedom in Syria Brings Legal Expertise to Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Action (physics); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.023454059332918456,"score_gpt":0.3163638634467746,"score_spread":0.29290980411385614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001714122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25121728,0.00018130412,0.0010927657,0.49193352,0.0045791315,0.0014413894,0.00012026051,0.0001480546,0.2492863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409195,0.000013587603,0.0013055129,0.011313925,0.00094109337,0.00021229575,0.0000049646096,0.000020831387,0.045268264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998441,0.00011737982,0.000310289,0.00029980106,0.00036978332,0.000461745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986682,0.00040746937,0.00009253358,0.00026487687,0.00024897218,0.00031794203],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006185785,0.00012282233,0.00016387166,0.000070668895,0.0004543854,0.00026290698,0.00034353306,0.000090161884,0.0011065988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002048898,0.00010568752,0.000044113003,0.0004947019,0.00009647956,0.0009975054,0.000038302678,0.00017787947,0.0001521996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000408947,0.000060767205,0.0021530143,0.00000696614,0.000013058846,0.0000049526084,0.0033837457,0.0000070339925,0.0006016273,0.7181242,0.27190754,0.00369621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042684923,0.000019514493,0.0017660807,0.000047049878,0.000004972817,7.3001286e-7,0.0012480075,0.0000044895382,0.00034507253,0.00094587624,0.99499744,0.00019391172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9513198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99193186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7230899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006854263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023568484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001731502","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics and Judicial Law Clerks: A New Doctrinal Account","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Public law; Philosophy of law; Economic Justice; Legal ethics; Private law; Duty; Legal profession; Common law","score_opus":0.07032394238223445,"score_gpt":0.3687460304642734,"score_spread":0.29842208808203896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001731502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01352175,0.00021961116,0.00015031034,0.43335828,0.00081543525,0.00022897981,0.000010368954,0.00015744683,0.5515378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9181148,0.00007867043,0.0010653322,0.0756505,0.0028709308,0.000009577162,0.000007596219,0.000010313086,0.0021923082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983877,0.00029438364,0.00024953793,0.00027378774,0.00050331187,0.0002912584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986523,0.00040804406,0.0001157889,0.00013987515,0.0001998326,0.00048418326],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009610887,0.00011481969,0.00014306889,0.000027646,0.001336991,0.0008642427,0.00024592303,0.00019617943,0.0021115576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020803374,0.00012176445,0.000044522294,0.0005417907,0.00033302107,0.0016229304,0.00005700911,0.0015090881,0.0005263873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025776659,0.000025831454,0.00023603471,0.000006799902,0.000012264718,0.0000039198435,0.010242055,0.0000019422548,0.00006298494,0.95998585,0.028744863,0.0006516796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028688592,0.000040265684,0.0003423618,0.000011237508,0.00002028208,0.0000022794593,0.003193263,0.0000069825633,0.000051235158,0.009819418,0.9860711,0.00015469575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12199901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045112778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95732623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074751624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001985019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7002089478","doi":"","title":"Measuring Impacts of Legal Services – Bibliography, Network and Methodology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Foundation (evidence); Psychological intervention; Service (business); Civil service; Legal service; Legal research","score_opus":0.11262633396660243,"score_gpt":0.3662857915216923,"score_spread":0.2536594575550899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7002089478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6260515,0.0033334917,0.0006195516,0.13861477,0.001470889,0.0005069175,0.000019735193,0.00025682585,0.22912633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847829,0.00047961535,0.007022577,0.0068902955,0.0007240474,0.000006822192,0.0000037773586,0.000008777063,0.00008121479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985692,0.0005158185,0.00023751223,0.00018255567,0.00024375535,0.00025118413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987837,0.0004581077,0.00017117993,0.00011867674,0.00019440934,0.0002738926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013490117,0.00008378405,0.00017140672,0.00027298142,0.0004015943,0.0002230684,0.00020060016,0.00008692476,0.0004193766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005007726,0.00008395789,0.000049371592,0.0045271874,0.00018881471,0.0010729528,0.00004696962,0.0002935489,0.000030816587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067228335,0.000053766307,0.085397966,0.00011077868,0.00010176737,0.000003362383,0.010890928,0.00005199499,0.0017011494,0.88156563,0.018975237,0.0010802149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025719395,0.000059849874,0.019944321,0.000033105043,0.00004103274,0.0000020272935,0.0048255436,0.00001764425,0.0004646438,0.005633703,0.96855086,0.00017005538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038913526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01333346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94957566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009094816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020633766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96748644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7004766620","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Anti-Discrimination Intensive Program Honoured for Excellence and Innovation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Human rights; Enforcement; Privilege (computing); International law","score_opus":0.061152016504616866,"score_gpt":0.38124739507383615,"score_spread":0.32009537856921927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7004766620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6931743,0.00073769054,0.004448006,0.12631154,0.004872844,0.0037840186,0.000042807453,0.0005793324,0.16604948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872404,0.000044921202,0.006310653,0.002617214,0.0007198533,0.00022233526,0.00007597001,0.000011989241,0.0027567009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894565,0.00010543343,0.00024721722,0.00017294423,0.00021450994,0.000314265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981899,0.00021561986,0.00018972329,0.00013411028,0.0011505944,0.00012004983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010423745,0.00009501811,0.00010631294,0.00014217614,0.0007416412,0.00028466762,0.00011149488,0.000104581704,0.00014075877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029671558,0.000097170574,0.000024515737,0.00093234517,0.00019143819,0.0020619798,0.000022694274,0.00021326754,0.000047338483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000111394265,0.00014259346,0.0038575854,0.000021233413,0.0000116691435,1.0544993e-7,0.009476278,5.874413e-7,0.0006424446,0.96267426,0.010528252,0.012633863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031704284,0.000055418182,0.009408083,0.000026685906,0.000028849656,0.0000018973792,0.01547649,0.00003163314,0.0007486634,0.008191874,0.96551347,0.00019986599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027258284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010929034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95498526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007988473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023837284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57041794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006338798","doi":"","title":"UGA School of Law Class of 2010 is one of the most academically gifted in school history","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Test (biology); School class; State (computer science); Legal education; Quarter (Canadian coin); Point (geometry); Standardized test","score_opus":0.07121574570243257,"score_gpt":0.3582951951355941,"score_spread":0.28707944943316155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006338798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5492178,0.002566664,0.000038062655,0.016940737,0.0007951354,0.00057232834,0.00004495013,0.000031622494,0.42979264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99373096,0.00020925274,0.00027948752,0.0013491429,0.000075987715,0.0000073054985,0.0000018289475,0.000005627189,0.0043404116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998777,0.00015894871,0.00043442802,0.00010489578,0.000385268,0.00013947983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848646,0.0004662077,0.0003984261,0.00021384294,0.0003581586,0.00007688137],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006268665,0.00005494479,0.00013652611,0.000072993505,0.00006060564,0.000007617954,0.00032763675,0.00013585777,0.0016488752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004099819,0.00004824748,0.00004310098,0.00037996078,0.00046304386,0.0003545177,0.000038809132,0.0004346297,0.000008928942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003507834,0.0019440819,0.1090001,0.00024455087,0.000114029834,9.404563e-7,0.023588473,0.00003360928,0.08296104,0.4019137,0.37683344,0.0030152304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030109126,0.000021691614,0.08819458,0.00012110474,0.00003148238,2.2948632e-7,0.001529912,0.000007358079,0.03179445,0.0013060938,0.87659246,0.000099568926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029814707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017147139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.499759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014929031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087655365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006932562","doi":"","title":"York University’s Osgoode Hall Law School Celebrates Black Excellence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Economic Justice; Parliament; Appeal; Excellence; Governor","score_opus":0.02929516884221697,"score_gpt":0.2913840759513225,"score_spread":0.26208890710910554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006932562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010116699,0.000068553,0.00017582139,0.07601761,0.0007342417,0.00046440298,0.000022611366,0.00024959818,0.91215044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8751746,0.00011031365,0.0008277579,0.0035570313,0.0005949918,0.000013452558,0.000005111565,0.000016794407,0.119699985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813646,0.0003627632,0.00023554549,0.000374564,0.00043085677,0.0004598367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981653,0.00048668933,0.00017891183,0.00040577623,0.00031065635,0.00045267367],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067549123,0.00015976129,0.00015371747,0.00007468136,0.0011617019,0.00035869863,0.00060618174,0.00017051684,0.01059518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007376317,0.00013999932,0.00007691855,0.0006873084,0.0007265657,0.0020755278,0.000069814014,0.00038569965,0.008203273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018081164,0.00008110836,0.001389812,0.000005908405,0.00001694636,0.000005059707,0.0013182824,0.0000022808592,0.0006109681,0.9317092,0.06454584,0.0002965701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040036603,0.000024585248,0.0003961056,0.00005919116,0.00001614741,9.01177e-7,0.004686485,0.0000018526738,0.0005417016,0.014963,0.9786652,0.00024446484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09227464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08677615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91674614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000298447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010135744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99256897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7007851218","doi":"","title":"Alternative Perspectives on Lawyers and Legal Ethics: Reimagining the Profession","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Legal ethics; Scholarship; Ethos; Practice of law; Diversity (politics); Professional responsibility; Professional conduct; Legal realism","score_opus":0.06561607883120969,"score_gpt":0.4664292174892902,"score_spread":0.40081313865808055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7007851218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050311603,0.0000056255362,0.00004510621,0.4633124,0.000749413,0.00006571029,4.293965e-7,0.000029240882,0.4854805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97376,0.00003146872,0.0005506304,0.0033293832,0.00040203644,0.000010119039,4.637102e-7,0.000003177494,0.021912696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993056,0.00021744377,0.00006280959,0.00011248287,0.00020795071,0.00009370547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987255,0.0009044423,0.00005267011,0.00009009421,0.00019109815,0.000036242407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001368777,0.000039975665,0.000031887677,0.00003405258,0.0011602838,0.00023695585,0.00010617649,0.00005400816,0.0005110956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026929113,0.000021968468,0.0000106513535,0.00016815124,0.00035655117,0.0005358942,0.00001650111,0.0014270007,0.000034604014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034650418,0.000017335824,0.00017826076,4.194008e-7,0.0000031719655,1.9680748e-7,0.15311843,2.0523171e-7,0.00014478803,0.8435776,0.0012619137,0.0016942172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005827783,0.000011176598,0.00090946496,0.0000048379807,0.000002924023,7.5929586e-7,0.33183444,0.000024868215,0.000109703586,0.004658446,0.6623378,0.000047354213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009519686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035343901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92344844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018973347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046288717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99707603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7007986728","doi":"","title":"Alberta Legal Services Mapping Project: Research Proposal","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Criminal justice; Legal service; Plan (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Legal profession","score_opus":0.06669861566729728,"score_gpt":0.41127504368441814,"score_spread":0.34457642801712085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7007986728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07409687,0.0000763516,0.000047789636,0.04905186,0.00089684717,0.00061891536,0.0000031082277,0.00011436616,0.8750939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9136189,0.000018607061,0.0025913704,0.002583761,0.0016997783,0.000048617123,0.000019493837,0.000020726073,0.07939872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730814,0.00042772174,0.0003323938,0.0003228556,0.0009012381,0.0007076731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792707,0.0007222629,0.00011230359,0.00031080135,0.00069452426,0.0002330145],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005945803,0.00011033015,0.000117643314,0.00023825544,0.001945292,0.0009069326,0.0005001931,0.00015552103,0.0012892077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011295938,0.00010893115,0.00004528744,0.0019829175,0.00034434578,0.002003658,0.000078849334,0.0009783163,0.0014196096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021343374,0.00013005141,0.0028625994,0.000029146588,0.000015623586,0.000007215212,0.018092882,4.2250326e-7,0.0003753133,0.9590989,0.017935993,0.0014305402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013998579,0.000022525359,0.0013772447,0.00003192499,0.000004155023,0.000003018029,0.02694087,0.000005119402,0.00019389763,0.0032288055,0.9679085,0.00014396929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45708612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43969098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022897992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002203792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008454788","doi":"","title":"The Communities Being Served are the Resources that are Needed: Innovations in Community-Based Justice in Ontario, an Anthology of Canadian Research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legal advice; Social justice; Community organization; Service (business); Legal service; Service provider","score_opus":0.1766220266453248,"score_gpt":0.38669092904415164,"score_spread":0.21006890239882683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008454788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8457163,0.000043504177,5.3810044e-7,0.11816875,0.00026781193,0.00030837243,0.000028213846,0.00001628606,0.035450242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910163,0.000012949057,0.000058761663,0.0076512964,0.00004641782,0.00017756077,0.00006106799,0.000011069565,0.0009645286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899951,0.008582602,0.00035106015,0.00010583138,0.00051868724,0.00044667025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945593,0.003964165,0.00022536343,0.0006821935,0.00046959022,0.0000994048],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121204285,0.00008904842,0.00014319552,0.0007528335,0.010701062,0.00036372198,0.0013240204,0.000079198515,0.0005088022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001420779,0.00007671418,0.000024874074,0.0041918075,0.0009451443,0.0005104537,0.00016405032,0.004117657,0.000006272055],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044858956,0.00024958342,0.33034396,0.000017012411,0.000011057415,0.000006152703,0.31911162,0.0007652372,0.000014301733,0.3447313,0.004625285,0.000079630816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012337771,0.000023760964,0.09683616,0.000019616597,0.0000040464247,6.044366e-7,0.51732546,0.000015619278,0.0000058258033,0.0022224616,0.38336736,0.00005570447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37874207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083221163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029909217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008466828","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Forum on Civil Justice: Project Evaluation: Final Report","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Civil service; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.10611209678871562,"score_gpt":0.3896431925093996,"score_spread":0.28353109572068397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008466828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002466383,0.0001516247,0.0000036531605,0.20221354,0.0017673925,0.00047021938,0.0000059220306,0.000046849673,0.7928744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9223906,0.000044194923,0.0001345465,0.007915899,0.0009860042,0.00015514219,0.000017557255,0.0000109279,0.06834517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979296,0.0003423988,0.00026821066,0.00022549236,0.00081695704,0.00041737233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830794,0.00036573035,0.00016169721,0.00038200282,0.0005565327,0.00022608033],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026346496,0.00009424533,0.00007491866,0.00007486977,0.0047755972,0.00078892516,0.00028461072,0.00010167127,0.004908447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053074392,0.000077553384,0.000045848174,0.00070516206,0.00020659798,0.00058129645,0.000012603097,0.00048346163,0.0011775135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036337058,0.00003766878,0.00045137902,0.0000021666938,0.000011340277,0.000011021675,0.0020749536,0.00000981293,0.0000010358326,0.5074059,0.48594567,0.004045443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013232853,0.000022672553,0.00071747886,0.000009203656,0.000035584544,0.000010487634,0.003706179,0.00011514765,0.000004197439,0.0027080942,0.99242747,0.00011114501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49305815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9698709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9199242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060026837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035897119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008676443","doi":"","title":"The cost of family law legal services in Canada: a historical and critical analysis of lawyers' business decisions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Practice of law; Legal profession; Scholarship; Legal ethics; Legal advice; Legal opinion; Legal service; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04251192271479714,"score_gpt":0.34284422580476104,"score_spread":0.3003323030899639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008676443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83949804,0.000809609,1.7263609e-7,0.0016177708,0.0018865394,0.00040358712,0.0007305243,0.0000211908,0.15503256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974217,0.00036396898,0.00011552055,0.00031534312,0.000027338461,0.00004811088,0.00021619433,0.000024154737,0.0014676772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640214,0.0006082844,0.00097535853,0.0004086187,0.0012276312,0.00037793655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99319226,0.0029645143,0.0005687712,0.00038918617,0.0026304983,0.00025477933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020066588,0.0002448663,0.000635373,0.00044486116,0.0012280206,0.00012280901,0.0005772079,0.0003232615,0.00006310375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00632713,0.00022164464,0.000113643706,0.0039472845,0.00019993006,0.0009407951,0.00005614906,0.0008947281,0.00000318398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014392052,0.00019929674,0.00046243423,0.00008488774,0.00029859054,0.000010396964,0.0003082008,0.000036382324,0.00031147306,0.97592145,0.00008637177,0.022136578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035827138,0.000027856002,0.034441058,0.00019689469,0.0010604869,0.000001369902,0.024389844,0.000037746155,0.00011499404,0.009806672,0.92911434,0.00045047622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98065084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027161462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033131419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94450665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008704155","doi":"","title":"The Community Being Helped Is the Resource That is Needed","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Intermediary; Community organization; Economic Justice; Resource (disambiguation); Service (business); Empowerment; Capacity building","score_opus":0.0701207582092125,"score_gpt":0.3406310667620692,"score_spread":0.27051030855285674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008704155","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047375545,0.00012883231,0.000017862418,0.64728636,0.00025517808,0.0002079128,0.000007792476,0.00008530037,0.30463526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8269124,0.000046976234,0.00009147663,0.16468619,0.00048715473,0.0000221659,0.0000056117815,0.000010675525,0.007737332],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978712,0.0010995255,0.00019470138,0.00012989964,0.00043058666,0.000274043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754125,0.001537995,0.00014384193,0.00046207622,0.00014042109,0.00017442854],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001816474,0.000096190044,0.000091948175,0.000013621231,0.0068031955,0.0010516555,0.0008733294,0.00007685009,0.0013016389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019255517,0.00006376148,0.00007113317,0.0007056356,0.00040550664,0.00058726774,0.000116124625,0.0012207157,0.00062720006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017866669,0.00003494471,0.00084289664,0.000004622049,0.000036066765,4.5683691e-7,0.18636732,0.0000011857506,0.000069796864,0.36522236,0.44575158,0.0016509016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009094319,0.000011546561,0.000379508,0.000006158187,0.0000152380935,3.2930703e-7,0.11170157,0.000011791936,0.00035863207,0.0048834733,0.88246006,0.0000807236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044021986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00805584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7795369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060437007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033434396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008763709","doi":"","title":"Celebrating Osgoode Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Theme (computing); Scholarship; Key (lock); Event (particle physics)","score_opus":0.07891522711934829,"score_gpt":0.41232009220644944,"score_spread":0.33340486508710115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008763709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028668752,0.000038282244,0.00016947796,0.050488792,0.00063801376,0.00015933164,0.0000015978319,0.000112675516,0.9197231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970983,0.000011036214,0.0020220121,0.002967508,0.0013485684,0.00003317106,0.0000059920394,0.0000113398455,0.022617342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767584,0.00089669967,0.00019814896,0.00021087124,0.0006125834,0.0004058773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998092,0.0008874393,0.00007148852,0.00027763765,0.00045378873,0.00021765682],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047191815,0.000065449814,0.000084321364,0.00008223999,0.0019337524,0.00059825415,0.00032189995,0.00009446233,0.0030329227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005852105,0.00006718008,0.00003167184,0.0008719974,0.00027607355,0.0009254688,0.000043505606,0.0007598934,0.0026246314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023563844,0.000036976253,0.0010619019,0.000003556024,0.0000035606367,3.3307384e-7,0.0028917193,0.0000025484114,0.00026260738,0.96200794,0.03173133,0.0019951619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096775075,0.00001857268,0.0005945961,0.000010710258,0.000002533834,3.9392057e-7,0.0035513747,0.000025262958,0.00023027767,0.0308379,0.96454084,0.000090768786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04629643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032868117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94231427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109826244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060274964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009047720","doi":"","title":"Document: Common Law Legal Education in Canada's Age of Light, Soap and Water","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; SOAP; Legislation; Work (physics); Legal education","score_opus":0.012575803125286108,"score_gpt":0.2979295344519989,"score_spread":0.28535373132671277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009047720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.641976,0.0000890232,0.0000031299953,0.0829633,0.0007069127,0.00018814868,0.0000060749226,0.00001557265,0.27405185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98788655,0.000029609972,0.00009647564,0.0024791122,0.00015421757,0.000018680657,0.000010586986,0.000006222175,0.009318573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990063,0.00016353835,0.00024581494,0.00014238969,0.00023287359,0.00020913359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994301,0.000115740135,0.00007553538,0.00015933145,0.00009835517,0.00012094017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004381435,0.00007115477,0.00011182226,0.000044379674,0.00022767879,0.00011580373,0.0001401026,0.00004874987,0.0008769079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008967722,0.000050231396,0.000015457608,0.00015015456,0.0001290112,0.0009942034,0.000025972475,0.00014430366,0.00004755623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009028611,0.000055679062,0.0069833277,0.000008868494,0.0000064296473,0.000001963238,0.0018159194,2.2871777e-7,0.0019977107,0.9807569,0.0051557915,0.003208195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001853299,0.000009393693,0.004120565,0.0000362194,0.000005636536,8.900008e-7,0.0015905265,1.0334855e-7,0.0032410133,0.010446676,0.9802683,0.00009537569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9873764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9751125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003374128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023537483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9601527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009352162","doi":"","title":"Durkee presents at St. John's University","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Center (category theory); Security council","score_opus":0.03971394688846003,"score_gpt":0.31032925041181914,"score_spread":0.2706153035233591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009352162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09763314,0.000044945406,0.00005271955,0.19479464,0.0006945012,0.00022620804,0.000035668127,0.00018164582,0.70633656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439922,0.0000438015,0.0003674833,0.007280524,0.0006361123,0.0000019772626,0.000020498786,0.000008387675,0.04764903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894273,0.00022107098,0.000110485904,0.00020189713,0.00031148625,0.00021234505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991559,0.000135663,0.000083392566,0.00015062116,0.00014497488,0.00032946782],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025154502,0.0000698995,0.000082936276,0.000026115133,0.0009615158,0.00014520102,0.0003002106,0.00007584704,0.008067711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007606861,0.00007971973,0.000044391156,0.0005950793,0.00015424144,0.00097218313,0.00008392835,0.00028844707,0.0021175006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045910267,0.000074954514,0.008514895,0.000009126695,0.000028020635,0.000014149655,0.007594218,0.000009350091,0.00017612013,0.581708,0.40146956,0.00035569372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019288575,0.000012306967,0.0022621776,0.000003304521,0.000010908796,3.2031986e-7,0.002963392,0.000008307348,0.000060610182,0.00037355983,0.9940134,0.00009882426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011194332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8463591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017494812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004375006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010033845","doi":"","title":"Former Georgia lieutenant governor and noted legal journalist to teach at Georgia Law this spring","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; State (computer science); White (mutation); Politics; Spring (device); Legal education; Common law; Legislation","score_opus":0.024650279725047963,"score_gpt":0.3343839126051762,"score_spread":0.30973363288012823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010033845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67434996,0.00020072139,0.00005637503,0.0925659,0.0012527547,0.0003288244,0.000034173303,0.000112303445,0.23109896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9530415,0.00009123406,0.0011125271,0.0024449327,0.0005894586,0.000028987291,0.000005161092,0.00001679744,0.0426694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988067,0.000087388835,0.0002167189,0.00021929879,0.00035657242,0.0003133019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989385,0.00028526632,0.00010172033,0.00020017328,0.00020312681,0.00027119694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004470135,0.000108842214,0.00011903322,0.000047858884,0.0011253571,0.00055955024,0.00021516098,0.00009712122,0.0007984967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014457823,0.00009538836,0.000039414852,0.00018749222,0.00016772933,0.001087063,0.00009730362,0.00048510832,0.00012675184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012253984,0.00034184748,0.008751099,0.000034749297,0.000075970325,0.000016627788,0.033110097,0.0000078758,0.02904807,0.83778715,0.08151691,0.009187093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014389034,0.000014800881,0.0060570976,0.000014471577,0.000023924065,0.000009713864,0.00042859468,0.000013493188,0.002073583,0.00011469199,0.99095476,0.000150991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0948188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03772221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90943784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011808871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038288764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9798368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010151917","doi":"","title":"The Government Lawyer as Activist: A Legal Ethics Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Duty; Legal ethics; Loyalty; Point (geometry); Public policy","score_opus":0.04892725249220061,"score_gpt":0.3643957618899934,"score_spread":0.3154685093977928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010151917","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015122938,0.00008771165,0.00021662137,0.5471341,0.0003991578,0.00015960987,0.000011585751,0.000079025864,0.43678927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95302296,0.000079306774,0.0002074192,0.03040358,0.0005779426,0.000028402274,0.0000051835405,0.000008732348,0.015666496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997849,0.00046586493,0.0002185516,0.00022545393,0.0009815951,0.00025956845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981765,0.00097312056,0.00015496186,0.00024726117,0.00018092958,0.00026718836],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013796239,0.00009437849,0.000121516394,0.00001525995,0.0020618686,0.00096933177,0.00037864878,0.00011139801,0.0015810223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045194062,0.000075693155,0.00011898595,0.0013903659,0.00024585647,0.00078588154,0.000051214018,0.0010303704,0.0009074865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021090647,0.00004118634,0.0009577155,0.0000019855631,0.00017507494,0.0000023262387,0.009325752,0.000018707957,0.00005857891,0.9683867,0.02055354,0.0004573031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008377125,0.00001875768,0.00088092097,0.0000016765176,0.000114388524,2.7471157e-7,0.008616022,0.000034378052,0.00010851951,0.0009491117,0.989086,0.00010618834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021997256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042444374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96853244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018675512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094627717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010724597","doi":"","title":"Into the Future: Civil Justice Reform in Canada, 1996 to 2006 and Beyond","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Administration (probate law); Civil rights; Reform Act; Administration of justice","score_opus":0.010369999123223577,"score_gpt":0.28183723053304083,"score_spread":0.27146723140981727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010724597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15215534,0.00069982384,0.000009835327,0.29741114,0.0015127345,0.0002790513,0.000012967002,0.00002761143,0.5478915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973734,0.000042315733,0.00041272724,0.017481448,0.001222865,0.00003343678,0.000008775595,0.000007784116,0.007056618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989195,0.00011775737,0.00020989792,0.00017214748,0.00032288014,0.00025780196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993386,0.00016078871,0.00006754492,0.00018942336,0.000110845656,0.00013274403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000668554,0.00008231988,0.00008524853,0.000044615368,0.0007596204,0.00021483161,0.00021851849,0.000052933523,0.0003756635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021852455,0.00006568238,0.000013283218,0.00076133374,0.00008612426,0.00049797544,0.00003328991,0.00033934182,0.0000678297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008488893,0.000031561172,0.0057974868,0.00000768361,0.000004252284,0.000003514584,0.0051992056,0.000017333059,0.00002300083,0.8573782,0.12890385,0.002625453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009463326,0.000006015631,0.025730448,0.000005058145,0.0000102217355,8.389507e-7,0.021232823,0.0000034853629,0.000015517107,0.0039518196,0.9488482,0.00010096449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85342634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008670435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021469556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5842463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011207358","doi":"","title":"Lawyers' Ethics and Professional Regulation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Confidentiality; Legal ethics; Privilege (computing); Professional conduct; Context (archaeology); Professional ethics; Legal profession; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.05208571663247804,"score_gpt":0.38495266570488224,"score_spread":0.3328669490724042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011207358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096546166,0.00036329607,0.00016971241,0.41682968,0.0025217352,0.00021764418,0.000009204291,0.000129454,0.48321313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9297682,0.00006800681,0.0022632624,0.009551865,0.0005555191,0.000015508618,0.00003126178,0.0000074057334,0.057738952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986723,0.00052789657,0.00014549468,0.00016710612,0.00034026886,0.0001469135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986954,0.00056378223,0.00007164542,0.0001362094,0.00040681844,0.00012614872],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012385779,0.000054973287,0.00006582489,0.00002474648,0.001358698,0.00025743977,0.000071800394,0.00015686014,0.0029954773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00298604,0.000057134366,0.000020549393,0.00037743108,0.00017455517,0.00078418927,0.000030955052,0.00078305363,0.0001749742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037270586,0.000042558968,0.0014922876,0.0000074454806,0.0000059708,0.0000014389486,0.0072311796,0.000001317193,0.0003381845,0.97676617,0.013495258,0.0006144495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001266329,0.000004293794,0.007078702,0.00002092197,0.000007304969,0.0000021793087,0.006151816,0.00000642177,0.00025537604,0.021678178,0.9645848,0.000083323015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025558665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0113661075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055043052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015305894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011665995","doi":"","title":"\"A NEED FOR A NEW KIND OF LAWYERING\" TO BE THE TOPIC OF ANNUAL SIBLEY LECTURE","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Presentation (obstetrics); Commission; Politics; Legal education; Critical legal studies; Dispute resolution; Philosophy of law","score_opus":0.10550734235611352,"score_gpt":0.37846251992175106,"score_spread":0.27295517756563753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011665995","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30144167,0.0030932534,0.0032000158,0.50340873,0.0013684613,0.0021343795,0.00021811805,0.000102622,0.18503277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98969537,0.000064288164,0.0008196165,0.0011137706,0.0002244191,0.000022554483,0.0000016382959,0.00000397523,0.00805434],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952936,0.00004609255,0.0001240471,0.00006701951,0.00013896053,0.000094521994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991687,0.00040902008,0.00008505563,0.00011387769,0.00017821795,0.000045146135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010186526,0.00003742194,0.00006945288,0.000029540663,0.00012248546,0.000029456014,0.00015830595,0.000033580483,0.00043620515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016662694,0.000028490214,0.00003227656,0.00024437284,0.00005373061,0.0001604358,0.000014127762,0.00006145356,0.0000025028967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067996436,0.0003457849,0.0009647075,0.000076534474,0.0000705965,2.6538473e-7,0.21350451,0.0003999582,0.0016399083,0.19314934,0.5232678,0.06651259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086136446,0.000036516572,0.00040069982,0.000009173465,0.000015085067,1.6433172e-7,0.0032040793,0.000020539565,0.0024577905,0.0006091451,0.993121,0.000039614137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008085483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012200412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6882537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009453746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116598705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011716856","doi":"","title":"New Crossroads and the Opportunity for a Crisis: The State of Canadian Legal Education","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; State (computer science); Legal profession; Legal research; Apprenticeship","score_opus":0.048730519334134484,"score_gpt":0.34823714362625774,"score_spread":0.29950662429212327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011716856","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03246705,0.0021335462,0.000051928608,0.8927669,0.0043625166,0.00090609025,0.00014385801,0.00003256382,0.067135535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68074256,0.0014229135,0.00053211657,0.024126416,0.001370571,0.00018845107,0.000053441177,0.000024019879,0.29153952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839795,0.00043538556,0.00034763128,0.00019210801,0.00024995586,0.00037699085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977921,0.0007517714,0.00023521303,0.0003140123,0.0004205085,0.0004863872],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026736953,0.00011949188,0.00015360878,0.00014925248,0.0015467514,0.00060198345,0.00034389508,0.00008581307,0.00078094023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017541841,0.00008622674,0.00007953066,0.0021665024,0.00070791604,0.0009596151,0.000032936106,0.00040628444,0.00013867574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016640111,0.000019730081,0.000057234316,0.000015777921,0.000026235613,2.0941239e-7,0.012158116,0.0000075125918,0.000002535904,0.5997888,0.37324402,0.014663222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030759632,0.00001899833,0.001144125,0.000021508184,0.000048526697,0.0000021708684,0.02119895,0.000043670592,0.000018301278,0.06799015,0.9091095,0.00009651855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9605768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8878095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8686405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012654281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014305344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7013257260","doi":"","title":"Moot Court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Argument (complex analysis); Class (philosophy); Work (physics); Strengths and weaknesses","score_opus":0.05999625848712472,"score_gpt":0.31780881238468894,"score_spread":0.25781255389756425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7013257260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015691241,0.00005878884,0.00031800792,0.069219746,0.0007613455,0.0001870534,0.0000040560512,0.000081091275,0.91367865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70308626,0.00006629498,0.000054763746,0.0003634002,0.0002465075,8.9428283e-7,0.0000030564775,0.000007120669,0.29617172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988844,0.00051015546,0.000084241066,0.00011350244,0.00019264591,0.00021510477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870056,0.00037751975,0.00008296676,0.00025234206,0.0004710845,0.000115553645],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011569697,0.0000721057,0.000067232606,0.00010123662,0.0011311417,0.00011882772,0.0006100012,0.000036500023,0.0003725147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039504032,0.000049825725,0.00003756754,0.0012719162,0.00040817718,0.00048084522,0.00007621986,0.00027789152,0.0015640992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033887252,0.000109825196,0.00021166987,0.0000020374382,0.00003579767,0.000004086562,0.15456253,0.000026284391,0.000012482444,0.6846594,0.15338801,0.0069539766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017734041,0.000011987518,0.0003268702,0.0000030637502,0.000024583675,7.3072874e-7,0.027126433,0.000035856985,0.000011695589,0.0032257172,0.96897936,0.00007636422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013567538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049378527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81559134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023423592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013640377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014095836","doi":"","title":"In Brief","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Tribunal; The arts; Law library; Internship; Legal education; Class (philosophy)","score_opus":0.052772045107207365,"score_gpt":0.42651049789147244,"score_spread":0.3737384527842651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014095836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007215667,0.000004776824,0.00006127835,0.057689805,0.00022803135,0.000025600724,4.0934076e-8,0.000010035947,0.93476474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91563404,0.000005624693,0.00068914733,0.004466824,0.000028593022,0.0000026775645,1.2266685e-7,7.7021275e-7,0.0791722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975574,0.00006456073,0.000040901836,0.00003064987,0.000052177187,0.000055943194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998586,0.000060502764,0.000008808862,0.000029870698,0.000025257486,0.000016935212],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003705703,0.000010236239,0.000013432755,0.000026582109,0.0000730576,0.000035908844,0.00002480226,0.000014168901,0.009051812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084843027,0.000010093043,0.000003966837,0.00034231995,0.000020735642,0.00034132643,8.2157726e-7,0.000052179894,0.00019475934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.0894861e-7,0.000015782593,0.0016452669,9.090996e-8,1.9317427e-7,1.3977977e-7,0.0035012763,1.4379808e-7,0.0000048512256,0.9685906,0.026015628,0.00022591745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028433475,7.710154e-7,0.00083751354,2.309699e-7,1.7892802e-7,1.0893152e-7,0.003688397,2.4546708e-7,0.0000365447,0.010119009,0.9852725,0.000016062688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006495629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006031741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9592569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002071544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028943195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014176627","doi":"","title":"Osgoode team of Anna Morrish and Andrea McPhedran place third overall in Canadian Client Consultation Competition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Economic Justice; Competition law; Performance art","score_opus":0.024441237408301085,"score_gpt":0.35062259527552714,"score_spread":0.3261813578672261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014176627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47115237,0.00000981414,0.00003569771,0.01687821,0.00018793094,0.00016236515,0.000014668874,0.000014222773,0.5115447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99566245,0.000030960404,0.0004649524,0.0012260952,0.00007864821,0.0000055700057,0.00001654002,0.000002699668,0.0025120953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993298,0.00010472995,0.00016924205,0.00010512404,0.00013258697,0.00015849901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932855,0.00015061742,0.000076995224,0.00006391494,0.00026264813,0.0001172419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057523884,0.000043806212,0.00006664156,0.0001370662,0.0002296424,0.000069996524,0.000053986983,0.00005729565,0.00054544694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065929105,0.00004552856,0.000008339205,0.00035999375,0.00020876533,0.00046448232,0.0000054658494,0.000092299306,0.000024445715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023127419,0.00008734499,0.04260278,0.000008048052,0.000006510687,4.0569566e-7,0.07291524,0.00000630714,0.0001813303,0.8600581,0.022981256,0.0011294945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008816046,0.00010525889,0.14456262,0.000038475406,0.000011604852,0.0000020816803,0.040030967,0.0007127258,0.00031161198,0.005593738,0.80753696,0.00021236546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8488228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9782438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8544644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011475528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010063272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59722614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014211452","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Professional Development helps internationally-trained lawyers with new online course unique in Canadian legal education","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Professional conduct; Professional development; Legal education; Immigration; Online course; Lifelong learning; Distance education; Christian ministry","score_opus":0.03585518397626471,"score_gpt":0.3598098208419933,"score_spread":0.3239546368657286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014211452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45656016,0.00011015567,0.00009178443,0.28306818,0.0034021814,0.00080715975,0.000026492979,0.00010690537,0.25582698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92468816,0.0000034862667,0.00584043,0.0071756844,0.00052030507,0.0000567804,0.00025486256,0.000014864274,0.061445415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984688,0.00016416147,0.00028375283,0.00022534226,0.0005008117,0.00035713083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982524,0.00007312695,0.00012939128,0.00014512737,0.00053347234,0.000866517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009177209,0.00012301063,0.00010880424,0.00017551133,0.00033806346,0.00021346506,0.00028161512,0.00010895004,0.00066071254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000587573,0.00011880344,0.000016803393,0.00064923445,0.000115400275,0.0011663255,0.000018208955,0.00045930137,0.00014870825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044451714,0.00070038054,0.02952808,0.0000068502854,0.000025753876,0.000006050063,0.016712656,0.00005567927,0.000015653723,0.8938801,0.056328773,0.0026955258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004311928,0.000019913123,0.024379697,0.00006578232,0.0000064478527,0.0000040255877,0.011446334,0.0000097166285,0.00003548725,0.0020889144,0.96132255,0.000189964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8974618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99487334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9049938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00127326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07444503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.930802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014531649","doi":"","title":"Presenter, \"How Green Was My Valley: Changing roles and Relationships of Lawyers in Silicon Valley and the Breakdown of the Cravath System and the Tournament of Lawyers,\" Joint Law and Society and Canadian Law and Society Conference, Vancouver, Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USF Scholarship Repository (University of San Francisco)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silicon valley; Tournament; Joint (building); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.023821111232206673,"score_gpt":0.20965494023035344,"score_spread":0.18583382899814677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014531649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9780625,0.0013897177,0.000007802986,0.008014603,0.00011196181,0.00044359508,0.000025250258,0.000004975859,0.0119396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987999,0.00037467378,0.00009683243,0.00023593413,0.00001846754,0.0000011862734,8.635461e-7,0.0000046495707,0.00046747993],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986034,0.0005268871,0.00020880801,0.00019119743,0.00030173737,0.00016797415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987059,0.00045445797,0.0003561989,0.00016927395,0.00019799272,0.00011616907],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015095074,0.00010779866,0.00026525903,0.000044505974,0.0014526253,0.00009493208,0.00015191184,0.000110065965,0.000006001209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007774291,0.000082576946,0.00004628908,0.0002422101,0.0022358042,0.0006073699,0.00010074985,0.00039550118,1.8232694e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013099793,0.00007441399,0.15952201,0.0006663991,0.000414013,0.000005460293,0.47043282,0.00001332031,0.0011364941,0.36543137,0.0016715752,0.0005011484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004618571,0.000056002325,0.19339287,0.0005596606,0.00031123438,0.00003186325,0.79008114,0.0017577474,0.00019008918,0.0010368603,0.0076712198,0.00029274568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8492872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93637294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3643945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104345396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030118247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014964435","doi":"","title":"Reaching Out With Research: Engaging Community in Mapping Legal Service Accessibility, Effectiveness and Unmet Needs","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Service (business); Stakeholder; Action (physics); Economic Justice; Stakeholder engagement; Community engagement; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.16574552006781326,"score_gpt":0.41489807204831564,"score_spread":0.24915255198050237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014964435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90350896,0.000066152235,0.000067873705,0.008949263,0.00014726109,0.00033172403,0.000002531354,0.000068131936,0.086858094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763066,0.000027435504,0.0006124022,0.0011121599,0.00014079362,0.000046026944,0.000007090753,0.000013403208,0.00041001485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930726,0.0055927048,0.00023304144,0.00020894557,0.0005003723,0.00039228995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963305,0.0026405961,0.00008932532,0.0003611817,0.00040319117,0.00017522444],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01139855,0.00011306627,0.0001760642,0.00023370067,0.003843883,0.0004913412,0.0003984906,0.000095359406,0.000069944756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002275833,0.0001094913,0.000017696975,0.0020751688,0.00045315144,0.002568175,0.0001616833,0.0026410436,0.000033916447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014873217,0.00053850363,0.43900263,0.00021224256,0.000045279237,0.000027424174,0.3177863,0.000050407118,0.0011648532,0.238207,0.00043217314,0.0023844598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001399244,0.00008760528,0.5600531,0.0004625792,0.000013881382,0.000025000252,0.19402602,0.000059499438,0.00036427254,0.007122688,0.2358651,0.00052102545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2452082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15231073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23543292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031315396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008409352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015126894","doi":"","title":"Roundtable: Funding Strategies","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Fordham international law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.05906893910911396,"score_gpt":0.41502927070282974,"score_spread":0.35596033159371576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015126894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000052363816,0.00023302766,0.0007079436,0.015569223,0.007142741,0.00009565729,0.000049684044,0.00011579812,0.9760807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011724159,0.0008568004,0.00079169695,0.0009333636,0.0076806108,0.000009179874,0.0000727914,0.00012149446,0.9778099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984388,0.00012102463,0.00030300318,0.0001578945,0.00069601805,0.00028328982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908715,0.000094155905,0.00042105195,0.00011111432,0.00014532502,0.00014120378],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046125465,0.00015134434,0.00014179983,0.00031047012,0.00082792883,0.003299493,0.00055702863,0.00021952693,0.09057491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010403118,0.0001512934,0.00009549836,0.00022319541,0.0001318853,0.0022229783,0.000019416453,0.0009616234,0.0004413436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004327862,0.000029683417,0.000008336529,0.0000016802853,0.000064915585,0.000006854235,0.00043016544,0.0000035728933,7.4121687e-7,0.5138867,0.48481077,0.00075227825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013616953,0.000010137532,0.0000057471393,0.00008740894,0.00001731199,0.000057660607,0.0028104407,0.0000019674019,7.751657e-7,0.015637843,0.9810664,0.00016813642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016883796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038042236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49824885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003210574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012380084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015776086","doi":"","title":"Trauma-Informed Lawyering: Practicing Emotional Acknowledgment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University Library (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disconnection; Transformative learning; Legal practice; Legal profession; Legal process; Human Dimension; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.028034004036048072,"score_gpt":0.2766300794495687,"score_spread":0.2485960754135206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015776086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35032117,0.000033670487,0.00005662049,0.014670958,0.0023702888,0.00053701084,0.00015674389,0.00059567863,0.63125783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2985544,0.00034855286,0.002258298,0.00007470943,0.00020392021,1.0615329e-7,0.0014850522,0.00002965963,0.6970453],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851924,0.00017346318,0.00017142358,0.0003269089,0.0005034299,0.00030555518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983429,0.00042618127,0.00052094925,0.00023370612,0.00027462567,0.00020168976],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022005838,0.00019272017,0.0002800813,0.0006418321,0.0012829038,0.000093242976,0.0006712034,0.00040102802,0.0061456882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105022584,0.0002959229,0.0001988012,0.0014017706,0.00022329354,0.004240943,0.00009124968,0.0006422,0.00051019393],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045975362,0.0003577931,0.0013218725,0.00036266947,0.00037942507,0.00009222274,0.8811323,0.000026689337,0.000052997555,0.019136492,0.08522454,0.01145325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022756952,0.000019776604,0.0032854164,0.00011270322,0.000082038525,3.306606e-7,0.59562176,0.00000583066,0.00004175693,0.00022706694,0.4001828,0.00019292413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013078953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06932973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31495827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029925985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005517959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015862800","doi":"","title":"Thinking about clinical legal education: philosophical and theoretical perspectives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophical methodology; Legal practice; Curriculum; Feature (linguistics); Clinical Practice; Legal education","score_opus":0.031764628757496985,"score_gpt":0.3462131657202818,"score_spread":0.31444853696278485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015862800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005311159,0.00039222563,0.00018218861,0.06160851,0.0008541796,0.00029221713,0.000023035433,0.000064598265,0.9312719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21418805,0.0017604926,0.0042943,0.0008922497,0.0018369287,0.0000013938582,0.000099297984,0.000033799355,0.7768935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978148,0.00044916966,0.00029982772,0.00057720614,0.000631412,0.00022761419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975683,0.0006100031,0.00041128206,0.00038008325,0.00077683234,0.00025350857],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015210293,0.000192441,0.00041646897,0.0001852007,0.00092069455,0.00018796082,0.0005372426,0.000606892,0.013408921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000987473,0.00024936092,0.00023059531,0.00023515106,0.0031786065,0.0005157277,0.00027622376,0.0014464135,0.00017701638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024180485,0.00021883288,0.0005717137,0.000028094248,0.000088547575,0.000008558767,0.044991802,9.615527e-8,5.115755e-7,0.9422016,0.008471869,0.003394164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022947608,0.000023531,0.002451751,0.0001872762,0.000110423294,0.0000053503672,0.09218373,0.0000026389248,4.3988655e-7,0.16220844,0.74233556,0.0002613614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008080107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033060336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7799932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002444165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008244061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017157507","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice? The View from the Street","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; Focus (optics); Economic Justice; Service provider; Service (business); Social justice","score_opus":0.10437362971872606,"score_gpt":0.37783675243822334,"score_spread":0.2734631227194973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017157507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06109339,0.00033368377,0.00019753035,0.2448329,0.0029291809,0.0006689836,0.000038593374,0.00011961269,0.68978614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9426913,0.00007157276,0.00050201523,0.052500293,0.0012038365,0.000074430725,0.0000071095683,0.0000098672235,0.0029395507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875313,0.0003461531,0.00018511945,0.00017461013,0.0003121896,0.00022879119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847907,0.00065948773,0.0000983144,0.00043631857,0.00018099663,0.00014583452],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009010651,0.00008331276,0.00007878645,0.000016079111,0.0014554119,0.00065309915,0.0010805867,0.000055654637,0.007683578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014451504,0.00004984779,0.000037700294,0.0006321462,0.00018315487,0.0010140168,0.00009769873,0.0003721201,0.0016302658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008661736,0.00006163792,0.0051957485,0.0000024640326,0.000022354468,9.0133494e-7,0.021489903,0.0000014506572,0.000009624217,0.79352874,0.1763483,0.0033302228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005386245,0.000007669926,0.02110416,0.000011621373,0.000044964396,1.419496e-7,0.009866349,8.468055e-7,0.000045069566,0.0077589545,0.9610216,0.00008476006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14390619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15495858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88159794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004731317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004270397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017775479","doi":"","title":"Challenges for Lawyer Regulation: Access to Justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Reading (process); Face (sociological concept); Field (mathematics); Legal ethics; Professional responsibility; Information ethics","score_opus":0.11983413489502659,"score_gpt":0.41485401879275907,"score_spread":0.2950198838977325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017775479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024206683,0.00045944488,0.0011301091,0.39714047,0.0019792106,0.00037330363,0.000012163636,0.000107456864,0.59637713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8796875,0.00031918543,0.011861256,0.03409628,0.0041459757,0.00032918892,0.00005367928,0.000033062788,0.06947386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885327,0.0001512112,0.00019433696,0.00027429548,0.00027943493,0.00024748445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824053,0.0004639019,0.00007755981,0.00028249028,0.0007257838,0.00020973674],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069150416,0.00008023132,0.00010525742,0.00004276207,0.0008613339,0.0006275008,0.00026962665,0.000090876565,0.0024713278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026526237,0.000089198074,0.000047486206,0.000549918,0.000057879242,0.0013915692,0.00004998642,0.00016874382,0.00042728925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009308299,0.00005903105,0.00006824714,0.000023211822,0.000011759569,0.0000010207606,0.0029559215,0.00001945727,0.00008117942,0.9424927,0.05029703,0.0039810985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014436874,0.000011117206,0.0021594998,0.000016531967,0.000030845433,0.000001141537,0.004116863,0.0000053987146,0.00046921274,0.010044599,0.9828732,0.00012721408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010722252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016100463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9325762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091242415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076049095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99844056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017790209","doi":"","title":"A Call for Evidence-Based Research in ADR","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Work (physics); Action (physics); Population; Sustainable development; Civil society","score_opus":0.2972230296262774,"score_gpt":0.48028925816497875,"score_spread":0.18306622853870136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017790209","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1473729,0.0003663575,0.00015300004,0.672258,0.0018030899,0.0018908033,0.00002779915,0.0003947916,0.17573324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97483987,0.00006696426,0.0007782461,0.0029232858,0.00056613825,0.000430491,0.00001582599,0.000012306066,0.020366898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810314,0.000480619,0.00021007108,0.00023000267,0.00052378397,0.0004523696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961059,0.0030306925,0.00004753532,0.00022093812,0.00044343254,0.00015151619],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062549682,0.000058948684,0.00008879915,0.00025963772,0.0007536074,0.0003211598,0.00030910678,0.00009843675,0.00072929246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077590887,0.000061525585,0.00004109834,0.002796465,0.00020635051,0.00091674214,0.000027463078,0.00048374385,0.0011876939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005972775,0.00010917918,0.0053581186,0.00003534162,0.0000062529602,0.000006252229,0.004678425,0.00005563914,0.00026500944,0.7414536,0.24500878,0.0029636852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022450987,0.00003243821,0.0024218452,0.00009070466,0.0000024097665,9.492629e-8,0.0026361332,0.00011692724,0.00009996618,0.010868359,0.98341763,0.000088996865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038631976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04706641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82746696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022874968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020390349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017840277","doi":"","title":"Canadian Access to Justice Initiatives: Justice Development Goals Status Report","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Conversation; Action (physics); State (computer science); Civil society","score_opus":0.07871070423357955,"score_gpt":0.4143699112467578,"score_spread":0.33565920701317825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017840277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04015572,0.00003527044,0.0001782885,0.07466103,0.0030752262,0.00047564667,0.000029378185,0.000081339254,0.8813081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578786,0.00003951373,0.004229925,0.016615944,0.00092350756,0.0001080053,0.00003683294,0.00002025328,0.020147435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790055,0.00016412568,0.00040926924,0.00036613765,0.0004893808,0.0006705609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967978,0.00026738772,0.0003672776,0.00064410816,0.000726222,0.0011972034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014421917,0.00014776761,0.00016172057,0.0001436428,0.0058827433,0.0028122084,0.00090387114,0.00011881259,0.0023147361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01269785,0.00016190484,0.00003155201,0.00037892748,0.00016535362,0.0038891085,0.000117552794,0.00041988387,0.0014570681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028492685,0.00016214176,0.03417227,0.000082597406,0.00009937098,0.00023496989,0.043040663,0.000029850487,0.000037643393,0.75213194,0.1643756,0.00560446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113775386,0.000007878238,0.07153991,0.000029979463,0.00005758549,0.0000035337416,0.0069037853,8.83368e-7,0.000081530794,0.0005206387,0.92051184,0.0002286544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71667457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91635484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9177229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089023926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010899415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017943822","doi":"","title":"Congratulations to Arnup Cup Winners (&amp; third-year JD students) Bessmah Hamed and Rachel Devon","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Excellence; Economic Justice; Competition (biology); High Court","score_opus":0.09008594255897977,"score_gpt":0.4854879095528478,"score_spread":0.39540196699386804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017943822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46125558,0.000012487831,0.0005686511,0.1387472,0.00090261217,0.00040110404,0.000008927864,0.00008400953,0.39801943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9182004,0.000025641384,0.0031835674,0.0019995451,0.00021669583,0.000027533173,0.000011996034,0.000007490022,0.076327175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894726,0.000097023294,0.00017549426,0.00020742629,0.0003648376,0.00020794515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882454,0.000198877,0.00013595274,0.0003616461,0.00028685102,0.00019212339],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082832424,0.000083145045,0.00010051495,0.00009189626,0.0022724138,0.001543168,0.00039649784,0.00007997208,0.0012488855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029638745,0.00007908536,0.000025092973,0.00022158038,0.00022001861,0.0011730094,0.00008567671,0.00020417522,0.0005573466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021967133,0.0002767782,0.22616741,0.0000058542846,0.00005934474,9.5037586e-7,0.0607279,0.000008623239,0.00022485203,0.5396495,0.1688284,0.00402845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002268772,0.000011480458,0.10541743,0.000007755501,0.000017724551,3.913234e-7,0.014162565,0.000004156181,0.000018891824,0.0015324322,0.8784618,0.00013850725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013337534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028551333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7096334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057527373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035001617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017976656","doi":"","title":"Civil Justice System and the Public: Learning from Experiences to find Practices that Work","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Work (physics); Action research; Process (computing); Action (physics); Civil procedure","score_opus":0.04670131189312941,"score_gpt":0.32781093403164413,"score_spread":0.2811096221385147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017976656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.536881,0.00096348533,0.0002568675,0.1264774,0.0018037697,0.00043581985,0.0000027521264,0.00018919911,0.33298966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866415,0.000030134282,0.0006797599,0.0020910634,0.0011628595,0.00015011006,0.000007598383,0.000010208877,0.009226767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785453,0.00080384384,0.00024165047,0.0002919874,0.00050253316,0.0003054458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679625,0.0021860588,0.0004345373,0.00022122248,0.00019331578,0.00016863806],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001852996,0.0001167048,0.00014807603,0.000052218198,0.0023382346,0.0021905976,0.00034804593,0.000092202565,0.0008984056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004339323,0.00008800061,0.00003488335,0.00078727375,0.00036940243,0.0018018623,0.00006424691,0.00048446088,0.00032316183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064924374,0.00005878982,0.008915245,0.00001641581,0.000026503174,0.0000035604912,0.07073745,0.000031341235,0.000022341106,0.89387876,0.025266664,0.0009780092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002146836,0.0000072438183,0.0029954626,0.000027511363,0.00004425488,0.0000014067143,0.2313341,0.000013955582,0.0000157301,0.00047638448,0.7647477,0.00012159477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063094005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01900523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8934024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008801653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034372215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018242549","doi":"","title":"The Continuing Application of Gladue Principles in the Professional Discipline of Indigenous Lawyers: A Comment on Law Society of Ontario v McCullough","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Tribunal; Legal profession; Professional association; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04020805784246994,"score_gpt":0.35345743563475945,"score_spread":0.3132493777922895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018242549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9116204,0.000040279483,0.000023074215,0.0685517,0.00027687484,0.00095993496,0.000025181771,0.000025119374,0.01847746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664646,0.000026642932,0.00023381856,0.0014355186,0.00007997477,0.00012556177,0.000031852065,0.000005756872,0.0014143962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998486,0.0002552499,0.00043940998,0.00012888962,0.0005043601,0.00018613331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821293,0.0008764834,0.00040953205,0.00027693025,0.00019164407,0.00003247166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025335706,0.00007391069,0.00013670555,0.00002199187,0.00050106586,0.000048376205,0.0003936816,0.000071170296,0.000038663977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017419823,0.000047881058,0.00007479354,0.0006803501,0.00037165167,0.00020992654,0.00005922452,0.00036421602,0.000012747095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025619422,0.00031546195,0.007260735,0.000021965216,0.00002029866,1.192182e-7,0.18324763,0.00005722849,0.00023667156,0.8065668,0.0017359026,0.0005116296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029392212,0.000047474856,0.027247673,0.00008541149,0.000012598601,1.8413235e-7,0.04613409,0.000029378542,0.0005516108,0.0054141344,0.9201073,0.000076189346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18359257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44659886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91837144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017327235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007380199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.821844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018350933","doi":"","title":"The Cost of Experiencing Everyday Legal Problems Related to Social Assistance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social issues; Social justice; Everyday life; Civil society; Social policy; Poison control","score_opus":0.03900529077985031,"score_gpt":0.36508151102778824,"score_spread":0.3260762202479379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018350933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20745347,0.00009484423,0.00009360295,0.11665942,0.0023648317,0.0006704352,0.000014866529,0.00008276276,0.67256576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737801,0.000015001018,0.00019726944,0.00076396915,0.00026473842,0.00008235269,0.0000020702462,0.0000095369,0.024884952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986262,0.00017941243,0.0003052618,0.00018234756,0.00041831966,0.00028846556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856734,0.0002077989,0.0003635719,0.00038484417,0.00034942877,0.00012703739],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014212609,0.00008299268,0.000116785304,0.000025286568,0.005823558,0.0009783955,0.0006437833,0.00009047484,0.0003462769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025694957,0.00006987243,0.00005432621,0.000267863,0.00047885854,0.0013680822,0.0000607065,0.00034939306,0.00016260272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001379868,0.00004314387,0.0017549801,0.000004059151,0.000016944225,8.4827036e-7,0.022877073,0.0000062900813,0.00055202376,0.95385706,0.018294353,0.0025793957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001401679,0.000012061646,0.009849898,0.000018489129,0.0000063434322,4.2975768e-7,0.007776224,0.0000033505848,0.0002498574,0.0020451802,0.9797933,0.000104667924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015327468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028913923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.961499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014530552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070043077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019099138","doi":"","title":"Everyday Legal Problems and the Cost of Justice in Canada: Education (Data Report)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sample (material); Legal action; Government (linguistics); Everyday life","score_opus":0.05389804749194087,"score_gpt":0.3540471638283954,"score_spread":0.3001491163364545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019099138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14629275,0.0006475121,0.000041033054,0.2613982,0.004533763,0.0012738083,0.000053470336,0.000022190468,0.5857373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99184114,0.00009096839,0.00018006898,0.0013012408,0.00029069337,0.00003648597,0.000025150202,0.0000048598126,0.0062294086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988844,0.00018604916,0.00029827128,0.00018773445,0.0002918475,0.00015171978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813825,0.00031415612,0.00043560602,0.000797025,0.00023010449,0.000084860476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001975373,0.00006064779,0.00011479161,0.000024794681,0.00094390503,0.0003618664,0.0005945705,0.000039748764,0.00015932079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060146158,0.000049216782,0.000010880215,0.00015113318,0.0003744897,0.0015788449,0.00009547594,0.0002844184,0.000008108355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027144133,0.000093569884,0.023294427,0.000040848936,0.000017719669,0.0000062208924,0.0032078272,0.000012203785,0.000014072492,0.91620386,0.052041087,0.005041004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028890342,0.0000025100762,0.031241504,0.000032660213,0.000030061308,0.00000763992,0.004794723,0.000033770237,0.000009167819,0.0015770205,0.9619068,0.00007523218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91462684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020073596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010860632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99474686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019963439","doi":"","title":"The institutional accomodation of an enlarged Europe","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Economic integration; European union; Customs union; Deep integration; Democracy; Resizing; Trade barrier; Regional integration","score_opus":0.03233797633445077,"score_gpt":0.34634456488461174,"score_spread":0.31400658855016095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019963439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000050213737,0.000037579543,0.06011874,0.0072792456,0.0015004296,0.004388182,0.000143908,0.00037520315,0.9261065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04003855,0.0026759168,0.08874444,0.006487446,0.0013345307,0.0043661464,0.0050907778,0.0003636778,0.8508985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973223,0.00050966867,0.00067057024,0.00023785605,0.0009183677,0.00034119346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971768,0.00012301386,0.00097374426,0.0006042979,0.0009648435,0.00015726597],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062863235,0.00021682153,0.00019994556,0.00062115624,0.0014359953,0.0012425384,0.0010108624,0.00036847364,0.0012568653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028371376,0.00018815312,0.000075867,0.0016209588,0.0008181807,0.0052350904,0.00009345066,0.0006569457,0.00028308175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012269069,0.00009591456,0.00001061138,0.000076314536,0.000020510442,0.0000014901295,0.004287806,0.00007972399,0.000105822626,0.79029185,0.17360859,0.0314091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001848685,0.00001236388,0.00006979814,0.00026261882,0.000015337195,0.0000056579065,0.0005192287,0.00002969134,0.0008765874,0.001518614,0.99627733,0.0002279091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068409257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009795503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82266873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003926559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008580294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020172368","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Legal ethics; Password; Work (physics); Legal research; Information ethics","score_opus":0.03550944821039266,"score_gpt":0.3371139079239748,"score_spread":0.30160445971358213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020172368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07949323,0.00003250383,0.00005606527,0.14954324,0.0015098583,0.000115652685,0.0000038575954,0.00003830977,0.7692073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97590935,0.000011286475,0.00032643334,0.017206365,0.00037848405,0.000011897656,0.000004851685,0.0000061174596,0.006145223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986551,0.00039975884,0.00018206252,0.00013729623,0.00038535803,0.00024045729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988761,0.00060058886,0.00006698309,0.00016517426,0.00014174749,0.00014942289],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014562922,0.00005990515,0.000081685146,0.000034422275,0.00046000385,0.00018191182,0.00020831605,0.0000834804,0.0013634275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032823624,0.000064467626,0.000016154987,0.00045174037,0.00008384717,0.00062258163,0.000016253325,0.00089373713,0.00020583456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020555358,0.000015832624,0.0056451643,0.00000294647,0.0000021402136,0.0000013472421,0.0017096851,0.000014819349,0.000010245038,0.9755961,0.016388252,0.0006114399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009878888,0.000004211635,0.0042201346,0.000007652474,0.0000020919958,4.228027e-7,0.0025609888,0.000015887877,0.000025378902,0.0028597955,0.9901155,0.000089145164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99974865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9737272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047848807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008393748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020207684","doi":"","title":"Law's Ambition and the Reconstruction of Role Morality\\nin Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Bureaucracy; Identity (music); Jurisprudence; Harm; Alienation; Legal profession; Scrutiny; Ambivalence","score_opus":0.016241933082856097,"score_gpt":0.2881054882130676,"score_spread":0.2718635551302115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020207684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3873963,0.00024319394,0.000016720944,0.17989029,0.00068318687,0.0002778048,0.000018617755,0.000037347538,0.43143654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99372005,0.000031776493,0.00046181455,0.0037617204,0.00033919598,0.000014132292,0.0000053676217,0.0000036286403,0.0016623159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912953,0.0002340862,0.0001962075,0.00010142955,0.00021969803,0.000119066666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993437,0.0001748354,0.0001353582,0.00012496935,0.0001508577,0.00007026839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007261178,0.000050386705,0.00008470658,0.000016482647,0.00060298777,0.000110027715,0.00009186883,0.000045029858,0.0006616282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003023362,0.00004205767,0.000019916602,0.00021461173,0.00045286524,0.0006938314,0.000011850592,0.00019674336,0.000016065016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012850893,0.0000137770285,0.0005365574,0.000002498205,0.000007533529,9.0352465e-8,0.0013649046,0.000008378915,0.0000628638,0.9902384,0.003574326,0.0041778157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036635099,0.0000057312827,0.0016385438,0.0000104084465,0.000014627675,0.0000033476317,0.0062603657,0.000034015102,0.0004740705,0.010995771,0.9801203,0.000076449796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95515734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9811317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9792426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011330274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065515866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72443646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7022296994","doi":"","title":"Student Success","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Center (category theory); Academic advising; Study abroad; Dual enrollment; Higher education","score_opus":0.1501816945407104,"score_gpt":0.4622841575951238,"score_spread":0.3121024630544134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7022296994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04536724,0.000003932026,0.00012406164,0.010343927,0.00038749192,0.000042233307,1.1946628e-7,0.00004519596,0.94368577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630203,0.0000067401184,0.0007601294,0.0012132017,0.00008148762,0.0000052054666,3.2514947e-7,0.0000012252708,0.034911387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999697,0.000038677095,0.00005139389,0.00004183107,0.00010443512,0.00006665332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978447,0.000031004027,0.000019507801,0.000052877815,0.00007763923,0.000034495864],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027407316,0.00001596319,0.000017710969,0.000022352468,0.00019932931,0.000052215044,0.00010007288,0.000015535614,0.017008543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010494659,0.000014023179,0.000007910291,0.00019636727,0.000041760715,0.00037991613,0.0000070417213,0.000051606992,0.00048636712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.5672007e-7,0.00006185928,0.02625818,1.8272095e-7,0.0000022850093,1.8669421e-7,0.047586627,1.0286631e-8,0.0000023774503,0.9155054,0.009204394,0.0013779502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028868071,0.000004396177,0.077439144,4.4071237e-7,0.0000022051004,9.017028e-8,0.021144554,1.8614436e-7,0.000059734324,0.0023607758,0.89892435,0.000035230463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015406986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035536783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9176531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015821235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016925474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7022402617","doi":"","title":"Judicial Ethics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diligence; Economic Justice; Core (optical fiber); Judicial review; Due diligence; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.06765908636197575,"score_gpt":0.3886267583934941,"score_spread":0.3209676720315183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7022402617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011917496,0.0001801783,0.0001238276,0.22980365,0.002094855,0.00008060062,0.000007835278,0.00010920341,0.75568235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9206962,0.00013338702,0.0027262694,0.035725538,0.0020527383,0.000017839533,0.000029468367,0.00001303463,0.038605537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986127,0.0004064247,0.00017190348,0.0001737019,0.00041336622,0.0002218974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985726,0.00048017607,0.00007003799,0.00020217714,0.0005112725,0.00016374061],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010918888,0.000061923165,0.00008316893,0.000026800299,0.0011684864,0.00037304527,0.00015979772,0.00016532472,0.007616355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005363909,0.000070131275,0.000045173347,0.00066394004,0.0001855119,0.00065641577,0.000030161915,0.000928788,0.0015526995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022341246,0.000053378528,0.00039565525,0.0000029567536,0.000008278385,0.000006013735,0.0056402744,0.0000013623154,0.00016137536,0.959332,0.033798784,0.0005976841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009305136,0.000004901603,0.0006231785,0.000008547065,0.000009034971,0.0000016142635,0.004506044,0.0000010291036,0.0003504828,0.018577974,0.9757303,0.00009383586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019600786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05452887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94193155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000882418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002985219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023486756","doi":"","title":"Orphans No More: A Review of Elizabeth Sanderson, Government Lawyering: Duties and Ethical Challenges of Government Lawyers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Parliament; Economic Justice; Position (finance); Responsible government; Identity (music)","score_opus":0.037956420503574916,"score_gpt":0.34436962348476985,"score_spread":0.30641320298119495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023486756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025341654,0.025480812,0.00006779599,0.2683308,0.0011986891,0.0008576802,0.00010992195,0.00007714404,0.67853546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94830567,0.039335746,0.0012326187,0.00878922,0.00037663121,0.000032935102,0.0000023607506,0.000014895455,0.0019099171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977914,0.0002640541,0.0003999784,0.00022381556,0.0011024701,0.00021830184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865836,0.00032170874,0.00032110646,0.00026009663,0.00028667905,0.00015204214],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017514202,0.00012108757,0.00026496983,0.0000124828575,0.0002664997,0.00004289135,0.00020691658,0.00015263843,0.0015537068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00189183,0.00011320733,0.000058217807,0.00022316743,0.0008469967,0.0002687088,0.00006718939,0.0003713668,0.000041593423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033982604,0.00012383725,0.00058268924,0.001011723,0.00006200502,7.346941e-7,0.008274999,1.6459981e-7,0.00043326066,0.96767056,0.02029931,0.0015067216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023073288,0.00014583943,0.0008665352,0.0011246396,0.000051531708,0.0000012108294,0.010303908,0.0000034536324,0.0012538653,0.0009540334,0.9849012,0.00016307607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025754452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031213607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9667165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001704731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025147604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024083729","doi":"","title":"The relation of McGill University to legal education.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Field (mathematics); Component (thermodynamics)","score_opus":0.009790944703838124,"score_gpt":0.24041480681984476,"score_spread":0.23062386211600663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024083729","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023765214,0.0000017572628,0.00029610455,0.634977,0.00039972854,0.00018145813,0.000017673103,0.00009018796,0.3402709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5840298,0.00005000546,0.0016937128,0.0006046148,0.00008469705,1.680404e-7,0.0000092634455,0.0000059604663,0.4135218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900067,0.0003935164,0.0000834109,0.00015763864,0.00020500076,0.00015975656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988838,0.00043198958,0.00013880982,0.00022880585,0.00017463161,0.00014197853],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019844327,0.00006744866,0.00007529282,0.00017879457,0.0013480326,0.000041439744,0.0003863758,0.000072877716,0.00025116443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036084227,0.000070866394,0.00004749758,0.0012308726,0.00013732747,0.0024454424,0.00007627653,0.00018877348,0.00008865789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027751774,0.0000477328,0.0014751303,0.0000024778797,0.000008525006,3.5819804e-7,0.0014149869,0.000014058909,0.0000032252406,0.7546769,0.24099122,0.0013376586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007707499,0.000021870419,0.013669369,0.000008406971,0.000014063806,3.2553856e-8,0.012482886,0.0000016702584,0.00006689257,0.00074957585,0.97282267,0.00008547351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040403783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010893062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7539273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016354695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010718274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024208546","doi":"","title":"RECORD-SETTING CLASS ENROLLS AT UGA LAW SCHOOL","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Class (philosophy); Quarter (Canadian coin); Legal education; Point (geometry); Work (physics); Higher education","score_opus":0.05211043628982902,"score_gpt":0.37220605693301684,"score_spread":0.3200956206431878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024208546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075409174,0.000388503,0.000039648326,0.02975724,0.0007473607,0.00021836036,0.000007859314,0.00018699944,0.89324486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9410464,0.0006323539,0.0006434643,0.004185888,0.00083434227,0.000053666066,0.000011983536,0.000013249415,0.052578628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884456,0.000225844,0.0002006096,0.0001848195,0.000277972,0.00026619036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987976,0.00053146965,0.00013616624,0.00019376815,0.0001775131,0.00016349714],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033005263,0.000078421675,0.000086959364,0.00003873945,0.0009328786,0.00027114342,0.0001992385,0.00007637359,0.0038349312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023298962,0.00007966455,0.000043758846,0.00027894828,0.0001321118,0.0008732584,0.000043881886,0.00022688824,0.0006254635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010461538,0.000403037,0.048540145,0.000023775994,0.000062957195,0.000019384943,0.009626349,0.000039948376,0.0007081071,0.4372832,0.4635862,0.039602276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116513445,0.000009154493,0.0012630429,0.0000132842515,0.000011881112,0.0000024025505,0.0012472125,0.000016116375,0.00024671594,0.0010154005,0.9959484,0.00010988458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024586393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006704981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86563724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013499238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025600448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024714067","doi":"","title":"Sticky Floors, Springboards, Stairways &amp;amp; Slow Escalators: Mobility Pathways and Preferences of International Students in U.S. Law Schools","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Study abroad; Focus (optics); Developing country; Developed country; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.03634673471259693,"score_gpt":0.3149816574544735,"score_spread":0.27863492274187657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024714067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9282535,0.00005533125,0.00008222104,0.0024444144,0.00041869422,0.00032990554,0.0008373785,0.00011130935,0.0674673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964263,0.000054179654,0.0017023291,0.00045129284,0.00029112725,0.000024377086,0.00019914997,0.000020446903,0.00083078386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977066,0.00021527467,0.0005823879,0.0003950062,0.00076902116,0.00033170014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870247,0.00029336527,0.00023699849,0.00029819188,0.00022528975,0.00024367006],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009248026,0.00018290315,0.00021779345,0.0002005133,0.00027760403,0.0019928527,0.0006955218,0.00015789554,0.0011897181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002289202,0.00017882416,0.00005877904,0.000706202,0.00068454497,0.00721481,0.0002717428,0.0005737312,0.0006742604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007929458,0.00059790903,0.90708154,0.000021876753,0.000035010362,9.417572e-7,0.0016101071,9.3182575e-7,0.000073656855,0.085691534,0.0017247461,0.0030824393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044218666,0.000043912896,0.09760183,0.00010190174,0.000010262397,8.0175465e-7,0.0012659989,0.0000042523175,0.00037291925,0.034689266,0.86518365,0.00028302192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006757809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006129612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8634589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080604055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054532534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026706172","doi":"","title":"2007 - A Banner Year","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Banner; Government (linguistics); Commission; Mediation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.029562090233770533,"score_gpt":0.34844625288847514,"score_spread":0.3188841626547046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026706172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027912337,0.000092899376,0.00024031205,0.015788956,0.0016402429,0.0001401191,0.000003742725,0.00012477365,0.9540566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9116958,0.000023673318,0.0020115732,0.008531157,0.0018485507,0.000008828105,0.000009179685,0.000013460572,0.07585777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989418,0.000081964994,0.00018824356,0.0001516147,0.0003193745,0.00031701647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999121,0.00020490379,0.0000746279,0.0001888685,0.00018723305,0.00022338606],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00164853,0.00006747565,0.00007172995,0.000059668007,0.0005777374,0.00021456453,0.0001910028,0.00009728002,0.011186336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089577906,0.000069024885,0.00003948271,0.00052797544,0.0001494973,0.000758543,0.000017778371,0.00034353315,0.0045985975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007873783,0.000053047937,0.0022371109,0.0000016052181,0.0000067810297,0.0000027342603,0.0018981162,4.8041926e-7,0.000051508665,0.86082226,0.13417146,0.00074702856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119166514,0.000008756142,0.003939622,0.000004834554,0.000005589243,7.2178915e-7,0.0028819211,6.0126257e-7,0.00008358358,0.0030404855,0.9898152,0.00009954234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015247925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013597394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88378346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010312496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003972059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028501972","doi":"","title":"100% of first-gen and veterans receive aid","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Quarter (Canadian coin); Class (philosophy); Legal education; Government (linguistics); Higher education","score_opus":0.04404270461299721,"score_gpt":0.34493138042911553,"score_spread":0.30088867581611833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028501972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59071654,0.00016302026,0.000020051571,0.07482944,0.0010607913,0.0002852059,0.0000307924,0.00018601942,0.33270812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869613,0.00022275328,0.00038396416,0.00093804137,0.00025102939,0.00001879389,0.000013222072,0.000008330533,0.011202562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999182,0.000112589696,0.00017326899,0.0001408527,0.00021513872,0.00017613749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991855,0.00033140273,0.00008366597,0.00014745748,0.00014218099,0.00010981424],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064266124,0.000058652437,0.00009324767,0.000069295376,0.00047871034,0.00011151174,0.00013755959,0.00006861367,0.0012217072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084954925,0.000060352388,0.000028684006,0.0007570344,0.00017932135,0.0005547319,0.00002393475,0.00018407297,0.00044943648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003896869,0.00012477663,0.027085762,0.000057529567,0.00006531038,0.00000638754,0.061942145,0.000018537388,0.0006514977,0.79189897,0.11233556,0.005774583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016234742,0.000022099934,0.0060939738,0.000016618773,0.000009674497,5.4967654e-7,0.0054758806,0.000009319173,0.00014327407,0.0035791665,0.9844056,0.000081497026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019239485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015743379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000334054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020360739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028561618","doi":"","title":"Exploring the Importance of Criminal Legal Aid: A Canadian Perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Criminal justice; Order (exchange); Legal research; Criminal investigation; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.1020561396249394,"score_gpt":0.3583387971762864,"score_spread":0.25628265755134705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028561618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46746138,0.000064989545,0.0000036335925,0.110591196,0.0010927019,0.00020193098,0.000016424583,0.00008382916,0.42048392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99210733,0.000040218867,0.00013181008,0.002325297,0.0005777675,0.00006173975,0.000004807785,0.000008653053,0.004742358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998927,0.00013238112,0.00017244775,0.00015167824,0.0002885498,0.00032796824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998998,0.00021700426,0.000087750755,0.00020890596,0.00030038055,0.00018799795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009855501,0.00006580379,0.00008252032,0.00008185453,0.0010304174,0.00017205298,0.00027101202,0.000032853983,0.0008489178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014043441,0.000057380694,0.000045064506,0.0012288915,0.00021584079,0.0011585975,0.000020408379,0.00033500596,0.00037923266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036536858,0.000009146824,0.0029742692,0.0000024436897,0.000011513127,0.0000046238392,0.019970832,0.000011698318,0.0000148925665,0.96405965,0.012811441,0.00012585548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072886556,0.000012128453,0.017635457,0.000010441885,0.000015402444,0.0000012969036,0.121583,0.000004303004,0.00004758197,0.008178577,0.8523469,0.00009203649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8645473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92955124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95588106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028105563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022292775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92950547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028687076","doi":"","title":"Gladue at Twenty: Gladue Principles in the Professional Discipline of Indigenous Lawyers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Discipline; Practice of law; Supreme court; Legal profession; Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Professional conduct","score_opus":0.052248350764250724,"score_gpt":0.3516995180176856,"score_spread":0.2994511672534349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028687076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8072728,0.00011451802,0.000015101955,0.14005569,0.00055423455,0.0005518532,0.000029886409,0.00004346313,0.05136245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98973393,0.000025726016,0.00031373114,0.006444287,0.00043830578,0.000054755365,0.000035162106,0.0000097473285,0.0029443365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981514,0.00045153545,0.00036333562,0.00020981887,0.00055180676,0.00027209066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888647,0.00041199505,0.00022005507,0.0002076584,0.00012879093,0.00014502314],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011228108,0.00010107897,0.00014746761,0.000041658535,0.0007323683,0.00010333527,0.00049293455,0.0000935671,0.0010564651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001051379,0.00007584141,0.000054355754,0.0008761417,0.0002585045,0.0005293995,0.00010195237,0.00048452293,0.00019984733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008876851,0.0004379064,0.067669034,0.000047219124,0.000027982378,0.000009095492,0.20711103,0.000066331006,0.00050490367,0.71463853,0.0087607745,0.00063840667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036623076,0.000046256304,0.03078144,0.000032137374,0.000014062016,0.0000013948016,0.026281953,0.000017665845,0.00023805657,0.0019871176,0.9400763,0.00015739282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071965256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0403403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93131554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118543605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089635025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029046282","doi":"","title":"Guthrie's Guide to Better Legal Writing, 2nd ed","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal writing; Legal advice; Advice (programming); Minor (academic); Scope (computer science); Curriculum; Legal practice; Professional writing","score_opus":0.022004331078854602,"score_gpt":0.3461391458057366,"score_spread":0.32413481472688205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029046282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08087786,0.00006263632,0.00010660894,0.24644832,0.0018893688,0.0003455428,0.000032699594,0.00017509575,0.6700618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8464573,0.000006192039,0.0033606275,0.07037197,0.0016636921,0.00021742455,0.00003319789,0.00002444733,0.07786516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799913,0.00036771945,0.00032370863,0.00028748618,0.0006360563,0.00038590867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989216,0.0001913394,0.00011544826,0.00030876754,0.00019862692,0.00026425812],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014695249,0.00010478604,0.00011925929,0.000088733024,0.0023469618,0.0005514216,0.00045730764,0.000049502716,0.026755871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009674606,0.00012312927,0.00006142288,0.00082074554,0.00010010013,0.00090147345,0.0001452189,0.0006319108,0.001266602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007423279,0.000067799934,0.0013288658,0.0000018688155,0.000010292259,0.000004745129,0.0026788397,0.000017845554,0.00017308304,0.43529904,0.5593173,0.0010929155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016233545,0.00003158031,0.0009034517,0.000003892894,0.000008649541,0.0000025170705,0.00720973,0.000002283683,0.000055169443,0.0010005455,0.9904482,0.00017167466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04270598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009447975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7655794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027626636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007966304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029637859","doi":"","title":"LEGAL EDUCATION AND LAW: A CASE OF CANADA","year":2019,"lang":"tr","type":"article","venue":"DergiPark (Istanbul University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.009522250236473514,"score_gpt":0.2558627725596811,"score_spread":0.24634052232320758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029637859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42626214,0.00009281567,0.0000060171265,0.006892995,0.00092135236,0.0001749418,0.000026661863,0.000010192723,0.56561285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88896376,0.00005065406,0.00015037917,0.0004702016,0.00006815426,3.3400232e-7,0.000007897089,0.0000070010205,0.110281594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892634,0.00015927287,0.00019251037,0.000259962,0.00022624664,0.00023566658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986463,0.00024416667,0.00026808647,0.00019879204,0.0004649617,0.00017766238],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024903772,0.00012264581,0.00017131158,0.00016565001,0.0005277278,0.000120912926,0.00018011878,0.00010152353,0.0010509096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009547368,0.00015690255,0.000033434466,0.0010601323,0.0002162634,0.0010455342,0.000051617637,0.0002684945,0.000017773822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003567118,0.00015505808,0.0005762484,0.000057509413,0.000044645934,0.00010431707,0.00879599,0.0000060828265,0.000028548113,0.97224325,0.017430967,0.000521728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002282593,0.00002713183,0.0002662206,0.000026944355,0.000056126657,0.00007352026,0.11508398,0.000021156648,0.00003392847,0.00023519555,0.8837885,0.00015899366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9354796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91976476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97200805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047859497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009792711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029968741","doi":"","title":"The Mismatch Hypotheses in Law School Admissions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Attendance; Affirmative action; Elite; Educational attainment; White (mutation); Ethnic group; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.0354623440364709,"score_gpt":0.3381460775431947,"score_spread":0.3026837335067238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029968741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025333066,0.00019570629,0.000036661586,0.15734877,0.0010938498,0.0003290303,0.000004673896,0.00013367474,0.8155246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95472294,0.00008463832,0.00060688786,0.013929861,0.0006954281,0.00007578507,0.0000042367233,0.000016648133,0.029863562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804556,0.0005969206,0.00032042962,0.00023064017,0.00040044403,0.00040600437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972758,0.0014415121,0.00013057406,0.00041989045,0.00017989225,0.00055227213],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019275225,0.000116464566,0.00012700082,0.000047983212,0.0020192815,0.0007274468,0.0005014469,0.00012038853,0.003564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011363663,0.00009022919,0.000056609973,0.0006431696,0.0003592325,0.00090362376,0.00004432144,0.00064103934,0.001629584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007802969,0.000066235436,0.0015162663,0.0000026729394,0.0000062695276,6.366317e-7,0.0012097652,0.0000059147364,0.000081571045,0.9605481,0.03552256,0.0010321848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016677605,0.000012903109,0.0016765409,0.000022841094,0.000005993095,7.792871e-7,0.0030598047,0.00001126306,0.000088339424,0.035054047,0.9597709,0.00012980813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027786596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07990123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9293899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012902224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010736447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030307716","doi":"","title":"Negotiation Ethics: Proposals for Reform to the Law Society of Upper Canada's Rules of Professional Conduct","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Martec (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Legal ethics; Negotiation; Professional conduct; Duty; Legal profession; Supreme court; Settlement (finance); Professional responsibility","score_opus":0.30702448477220223,"score_gpt":0.4478349298923426,"score_spread":0.14081044512014035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030307716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9135891,0.000019928417,0.00012396296,0.08291906,0.0008104493,0.00059856346,0.00009412205,0.000020974723,0.0018237926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987759,0.000008031728,0.00031867062,0.002619819,0.00016354582,0.0000043713735,0.000032733635,0.000010470732,0.009083366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836034,0.0003932636,0.00024077129,0.00018073175,0.00061206357,0.0002128125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751234,0.00037944288,0.0002987319,0.00022882152,0.001425277,0.00015536354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019497859,0.00009919706,0.00015342518,0.00006388601,0.0005467047,0.00008250201,0.000496967,0.00015753835,0.000015501555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005610744,0.000082537896,0.000071443406,0.00042285502,0.00021448435,0.0012931087,0.000089453824,0.00046171277,0.000007724873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002918894,0.000375973,0.5973649,0.00021744207,0.00019414663,0.0000017817268,0.13441546,0.000032150896,0.0009522186,0.2642296,0.0014087176,0.00051573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076971634,0.0001156033,0.12305771,0.00015193877,0.00007891193,0.0000014806393,0.0916831,4.9397113e-7,0.0040093064,0.0018851515,0.7779713,0.0002752771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06466143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70218384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7765626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054750725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059786374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7032685407","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Students Learn Role of Public Service in a Legal Career","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Service (business); Work (physics); Public service; Legal service","score_opus":0.038627773165186605,"score_gpt":0.3355333232826571,"score_spread":0.2969055501174705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7032685407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.702463,0.000090739646,0.0000040519426,0.038111117,0.00028361185,0.00029543357,0.000003911553,0.000044144632,0.25870404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893071,0.000011974188,0.00024238926,0.0030151892,0.00016709766,0.00007078952,0.000008976774,0.000010063381,0.0071664136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983838,0.0002870026,0.00028816744,0.00017860846,0.0005564645,0.00030595402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874794,0.00012885612,0.00013451159,0.00023142874,0.0005812859,0.00017598124],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008770717,0.000084577085,0.0001299461,0.00010155047,0.00024221605,0.00055016053,0.00049746636,0.00009919535,0.0038014066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007538805,0.00008777169,0.000033312965,0.001062223,0.00009053942,0.0024611142,0.00006826711,0.0003997183,0.0011994024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054135253,0.00043939552,0.17136315,0.000015026526,0.00002923868,0.000001053294,0.012193448,0.000010470294,0.0007606285,0.8071233,0.0049034236,0.0031554508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034641474,0.000018528324,0.07720972,0.000017857516,0.0000075930297,6.196423e-7,0.022253664,0.000014677407,0.00011357553,0.0054626665,0.8943989,0.00015576076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42794424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28748104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8894955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011844431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007276585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7034804437","doi":"","title":"USAi-1 888-879-0163++ Norton 360 support phone number Norton tech support phone number Norton 360 Tech Support Number calli norton support 1-888-879-0163 phone number norton antivirus support custo","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Telephone line; Phone call; Telephone number; Mobile phone","score_opus":0.024346216180854672,"score_gpt":0.3386540684400155,"score_spread":0.3143078522591608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7034804437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022231631,0.000005704502,0.00067757984,0.0055920933,0.0098445285,0.006676866,0.0024284085,0.002478264,0.9500649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.081422284,0.0017564842,0.0022497135,0.0028751707,0.0037661179,0.0024655438,0.005241768,0.002196414,0.8980265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96664023,0.002818416,0.0068495064,0.010189096,0.007238909,0.0062638144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744164,0.0015825806,0.006665777,0.01070233,0.003223367,0.0034095638],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015683366,0.0046025515,0.004871375,0.001640255,0.002916512,0.0020405503,0.0069883717,0.005711469,0.9750398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004547015,0.0050252858,0.0024057373,0.004985504,0.003536526,0.0049846997,0.0036893145,0.0071686814,0.9518524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005872467,0.004025142,0.21808523,0.0005401084,0.0014603176,0.0009182957,0.007226229,0.000007811505,0.001238826,0.0014372496,0.7580529,0.006420679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003599811,0.000025945741,0.0075305346,0.00047599163,0.0013079115,0.0011610182,0.0018648414,0.000008162227,0.005208987,0.00076384476,0.9724938,0.005559117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06109032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03959585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21444097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044055567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015642371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039011808","doi":"","title":"Justice Donald McLeod of Ontario Court of Justice to receive Lincoln Alexander Award","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Tribute; Parliament; Governor; Regent; Human rights","score_opus":0.04264721850681745,"score_gpt":0.349375691725173,"score_spread":0.30672847321835556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039011808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11694686,0.000055710294,0.0016164676,0.0775501,0.0031581507,0.0005631318,0.000027886208,0.00007829919,0.8000034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9532563,0.00001585585,0.0065025156,0.0076046195,0.00070666283,0.000025515734,0.000010695126,0.000015088235,0.031862736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816144,0.0002627535,0.00046532557,0.00024919078,0.00057491404,0.00028639974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997207,0.000973743,0.00030799562,0.00034152818,0.00089345,0.00027630673],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015839603,0.00012282988,0.00024621916,0.00009442882,0.00043949907,0.00009244777,0.00037509797,0.00013796189,0.0033875797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040351544,0.00012778609,0.00007033676,0.0006464226,0.00020189353,0.000594264,0.00004681609,0.00043256278,0.00034640272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011143675,0.00039917516,0.004067924,0.0001308021,0.000059968366,0.0000011044326,0.03201132,0.00027235554,0.0006908055,0.8103446,0.1507065,0.0012040165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028903878,0.00008402875,0.0054819155,0.000051155734,0.00019629124,8.705338e-7,0.0040036454,0.000009894782,0.00042780943,0.001363626,0.9879329,0.00015881546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25310126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43689367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8372264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003046207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021476697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042262324","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Hall Law School at York University honours outstanding alumni","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Service (business); Public service; Equity (law); Legal service; Key (lock); Real estate","score_opus":0.0387237015264795,"score_gpt":0.3047531607060165,"score_spread":0.266029459179537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042262324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03455478,0.0001365922,0.0000480072,0.043988254,0.0018473517,0.00033712553,0.00008135801,0.0002620045,0.9187445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9164685,0.00002633553,0.0005601783,0.004123807,0.00038307073,0.000013307711,0.000040975254,0.000017845725,0.07836595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977322,0.0006052219,0.00021676517,0.0003586262,0.0006428166,0.0004443558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867433,0.0002557647,0.00020270373,0.00035029135,0.00012602392,0.00039088028],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012132413,0.00013821907,0.00015835758,0.000097875374,0.005294843,0.00032027363,0.0005752452,0.00008935706,0.018619834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038266784,0.00017219271,0.00010119094,0.0010035608,0.00026848202,0.0009916393,0.00022824561,0.00083766854,0.0011765247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003567441,0.00009233222,0.003562575,0.0000045448623,0.000027943097,0.000010981722,0.0041759475,0.00008195706,0.00009195774,0.92622906,0.06562176,0.00006523542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003384892,0.000029336637,0.00048197625,0.000007670025,0.000028019891,0.000003341004,0.026624473,0.000007863977,0.00003991294,0.0046201027,0.9675952,0.00022359856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15812768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11862942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.921609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016199887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009901234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042332023","doi":"","title":"OsgoodePD hosts IFLP Wave One Launch","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internship; Attendance; Event (particle physics); Process (computing); Principal (computer security); Downtown","score_opus":0.14442126454226967,"score_gpt":0.42228572581533963,"score_spread":0.27786446127306996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042332023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018568408,0.000006970176,0.00038079137,0.100473605,0.0006987575,0.00008105983,0.0000011896879,0.00008645663,0.87970275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88580817,0.0000103855955,0.002589358,0.0043547438,0.0009672137,0.000005873246,0.0000027232738,0.0000038744165,0.10625766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993394,0.00007521766,0.000101555495,0.00010431756,0.00021808327,0.00016141095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930537,0.00012588245,0.00004489129,0.00012524195,0.0003248292,0.00007377863],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050401554,0.000038373037,0.00004485077,0.000045821467,0.0005234194,0.00015562154,0.00009605275,0.00005198808,0.019208716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007701035,0.0000365474,0.000016460897,0.0005080356,0.0001870264,0.00051319203,0.000015025557,0.00011369497,0.0022541767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002880465,0.0000853952,0.0009089578,0.0000010343666,0.000007884414,2.3130187e-7,0.015620901,1.7475509e-8,0.00013102466,0.8656319,0.1092428,0.008366979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005778417,0.000019423416,0.0037206425,0.0000022623653,0.0000038317726,2.5052793e-7,0.0038807534,0.000005776789,0.00033401442,0.0055625034,0.9863475,0.00006523581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008465297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012343952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8771047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045947727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047761534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042412619","doi":"","title":"Osgoode leads Canadian law schools with unique micro-courses","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Legal profession; Professional responsibility; Legal practice; Practice of law; Legal research; People skills","score_opus":0.02319303421247269,"score_gpt":0.3247648307351455,"score_spread":0.3015717965226728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042412619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027802495,0.00056291604,0.000052447216,0.13277595,0.0013019678,0.00035921295,0.000056401677,0.00032489756,0.83676374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567199,0.000049474365,0.0015159813,0.010988639,0.0007549269,0.000056353343,0.00003475078,0.000031781987,0.029848197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838763,0.00020270071,0.00021682707,0.00033272844,0.0003411679,0.00051893236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986095,0.00018063423,0.00005443807,0.0003008705,0.00026241652,0.0005921322],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007435394,0.00015833102,0.00013757886,0.0001458101,0.0011879858,0.0015714319,0.0003350501,0.00015871043,0.0027046127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027091953,0.00014671,0.00005241435,0.0010537317,0.0003289598,0.0017613505,0.000016497619,0.0009052582,0.0021909084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050734325,0.000022725013,0.0011470725,0.000012262021,0.000029317283,0.000023418943,0.0018449124,0.0000056278036,0.00018576843,0.94714206,0.049284525,0.00029720762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009346036,0.000025693796,0.00024994853,0.00008439979,0.000027421036,0.00000871983,0.0030300084,0.0000032166126,0.00048704766,0.006911875,0.9888495,0.00022869758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90523934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97190005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9402302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046770778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059303753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042435835","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Hall Law School announces new funding for financial accessibility to mark 50 years at York","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Loan; Debt; Student loan; Internship; Investment (military); Student debt","score_opus":0.09162661787453584,"score_gpt":0.3776540544175135,"score_spread":0.28602743654297763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042435835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120822415,0.00045337665,0.00079056586,0.05972269,0.005995094,0.0016814133,0.00010988784,0.00035730988,0.81006724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92585015,0.000009454918,0.009664608,0.01200241,0.003204723,0.00012828846,0.000039004484,0.00002505612,0.049076296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769974,0.0002584999,0.0004051648,0.0004757952,0.00059273426,0.0005680739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765044,0.0003928406,0.00020478605,0.0004076655,0.00034376138,0.0010005044],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025673935,0.00017200342,0.00022491811,0.000074197036,0.0010586606,0.0008689614,0.00060482975,0.00019315688,0.0010610903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006018199,0.0001841275,0.00009681632,0.00079771143,0.00018099594,0.0015608167,0.00011669393,0.00037846545,0.0013174526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001245615,0.00008366331,0.0047552097,0.000011003479,0.0000135235405,0.0000011346093,0.003807638,0.000014163124,0.0001128763,0.52445537,0.4655381,0.0010827772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040704763,0.000054389096,0.0050897347,0.000025209894,0.000018738136,7.493927e-7,0.0016713362,0.0000033168299,0.000068787056,0.03217387,0.9602382,0.00024861714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12015524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2624392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8050277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006987082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029961648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042518312","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Hall Law School Professor Poonam Puri to receive the Law Society Medal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medal; Natural law; Legal history; Common law","score_opus":0.038311461564646744,"score_gpt":0.3506136294819978,"score_spread":0.31230216791735105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042518312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009196172,0.00025935363,0.000042143973,0.3576522,0.0018756159,0.00060832617,0.000039645183,0.00017169976,0.63015485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8349761,0.00009124771,0.0035438077,0.09194035,0.0018414946,0.00025214313,0.00005250426,0.00003762717,0.06726473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968779,0.00073747226,0.00043329364,0.0005033222,0.0008230455,0.0006249643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971666,0.0006014346,0.00019045224,0.00066016347,0.00086982717,0.0005115498],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001774522,0.00021328239,0.00022963624,0.00001953344,0.0028791104,0.0010847732,0.0006767581,0.00023788644,0.005165416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001822852,0.00018297437,0.00019128287,0.0011564152,0.0004900124,0.0014608109,0.00016196033,0.0012082497,0.0026983176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012056392,0.00014023317,0.00019160018,0.000009828317,0.0000576468,0.0000042839174,0.008426222,0.0000066252464,0.00043873664,0.89662236,0.09387282,0.00021756411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026477783,0.000023715145,0.00046355827,0.00003409724,0.000037661594,0.000004100776,0.01934906,0.0000038414937,0.0010464586,0.027508222,0.951,0.00026451063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07889211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2905036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86911416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032841272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002071203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042531894","doi":"","title":"THE POWER OF LAWYER REGULATORS TO INCREASE CLIENT &amp; PUBLIC PROTECTION THROUGH ADOPTION OF A PROACTIVE REGULATION SYSTEM","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Control (management); Power (physics); Work (physics); Rulemaking; Regulator; Fluid ounce (US); Tying","score_opus":0.04046680023283509,"score_gpt":0.3170177412967738,"score_spread":0.2765509410639387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042531894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.850807,0.000048246682,0.0074854675,0.052129373,0.001222041,0.0023154125,0.00002637782,0.00015264747,0.08581342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950563,0.000007141681,0.0009415041,0.00013114267,0.0001591692,0.00017227634,0.000004627749,0.000010859119,0.003516981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980897,0.0005264764,0.0004253214,0.00020734458,0.0005390566,0.00021212769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786,0.00023216513,0.00046344017,0.00037669594,0.00095161865,0.00011603968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016918031,0.00009344626,0.00012932962,0.000075279844,0.00063655514,0.00011309073,0.00018991479,0.00010845802,0.00018990782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019405767,0.00006138068,0.000061121296,0.00085489394,0.00024502198,0.0014136736,0.0000327385,0.00013801029,0.00013442837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009466332,0.00009680518,0.0005360871,0.00001378832,0.000034306802,5.2141868e-8,0.0045301802,0.0000041797844,0.0031265465,0.9880521,0.0016068771,0.0019043598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037902122,0.000095209194,0.014533618,0.0001346926,0.000029510571,0.0000019640229,0.008752881,0.000003511429,0.0033146727,0.0059273373,0.9666528,0.000174781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008979479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005719281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9821248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038593964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005184052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043203441","doi":"","title":"Scholarship at Justice Institute of British Columbia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Ethnography","score_opus":0.01980784260251896,"score_gpt":0.27469679045816714,"score_spread":0.2548889478556482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043203441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2467567,0.0065017166,0.0000058240007,0.0036660973,0.0038770933,0.00086442666,0.00009679398,0.00044838892,0.73778296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8726698,0.0022012722,0.00080218585,0.0029127619,0.0024458556,0.00008652466,0.00017116703,0.000052367264,0.11865805],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621546,0.0005404029,0.000602804,0.0004035511,0.00059708976,0.0016406813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830574,0.00036052088,0.00036960645,0.0003641566,0.00017654704,0.00042344892],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012864626,0.000113744194,0.00032066242,0.000031529384,0.001874752,0.0030522235,0.0006448787,0.0002652466,0.14526743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005285326,0.00031340582,0.00013807123,0.0018838414,0.0004930508,0.009319914,0.00019688287,0.0009592754,0.00011150337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009853284,0.00035544537,0.12571958,0.000036476828,0.00006794707,0.000009409314,0.00045247076,0.000008390152,0.0000017220133,0.07890825,0.77561295,0.018817509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037638456,0.000063840445,0.021037351,0.00012517824,0.00009823754,0.00007817724,0.0002537878,0.000006013605,0.0000016780524,0.06913533,0.9084819,0.00034209437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27637988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89026606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62591314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030338543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025161714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043281588","doi":"","title":"Should legal professional privilege be absolute: a comparative appraisal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"Scientific Repository (Petra Christian University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Legal advice; Subject (documents); Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Administration of justice; Confidentiality; Legal profession; Absolute (philosophy)","score_opus":0.1460865073040608,"score_gpt":0.4175134390420971,"score_spread":0.2714269317380363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043281588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035082464,0.002733202,0.00007779489,0.12055828,0.07381307,0.001112559,0.0005431489,0.00026931893,0.8005418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007805762,0.00012108776,0.00032889555,0.0007247099,0.0017798004,0.000010747189,0.0012581935,0.000027878299,0.98794293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937843,0.0012266333,0.00065601914,0.0011701626,0.002476876,0.000685991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99402714,0.00049776403,0.0010288471,0.00088433817,0.0028971874,0.0006647043],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028208862,0.0004329929,0.00065564516,0.00087322603,0.0037818432,0.0011519119,0.001575286,0.0005684173,0.0013007423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011663897,0.00046867764,0.0002869219,0.003560024,0.0020851605,0.0017017669,0.00023273689,0.0019950422,0.00027882357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020991796,0.00026874253,0.000013801191,0.00023744386,0.00007622188,0.00011061564,0.006753788,0.0000027854464,0.000019308378,0.017408255,0.97499794,0.00009008604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002333437,0.000031236577,0.00005769497,0.00076254527,0.000217204,0.000017802971,0.009496817,0.000012870344,0.000011463362,0.000029753239,0.9885956,0.000533654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007233942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057514976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18740112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010913078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019170519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043394301","doi":"","title":"Talking with the Public: The Public, Communication and the Civil Justice System","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Foundation (evidence); Government (linguistics); Social justice; Order (exchange); Civil society","score_opus":0.037943896776235254,"score_gpt":0.29648789687214494,"score_spread":0.25854400009590967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043394301","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041594766,0.0011120975,0.00011264095,0.6023501,0.0002730518,0.00038319916,0.0000023386137,0.00008356704,0.39152348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98604625,0.00023505426,0.00011703794,0.007984547,0.00034355334,0.00012637369,0.0000037051523,0.000010409231,0.005133071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976646,0.0012934379,0.00019528593,0.00014909354,0.00044168593,0.0002558993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968152,0.0018132707,0.00023725782,0.0006697873,0.00037026414,0.000094222996],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034162998,0.00009599815,0.000096773976,0.000029352146,0.005304359,0.0023690253,0.00079685304,0.00006071589,0.0005858047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013426846,0.000044772332,0.00003096577,0.0008308159,0.0011465532,0.0014108823,0.000087475215,0.0006336562,0.00016802919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046047376,0.000022233104,0.00014999344,0.000008011302,0.00002177073,2.595713e-7,0.009554877,0.0000011058407,0.0000011486198,0.9588919,0.030459784,0.00088430475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027751984,0.000006270689,0.00023631348,0.000015538857,0.000062173865,0.000011620676,0.053256974,0.00019180577,0.0000010064558,0.000571891,0.9452915,0.00007736727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005304774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04123526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98188674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000909185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019308286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043704403","doi":"","title":"Tracking\\tthe Trends of\\t the Self-Represented Litigant Phenomenon: Data from the National Self-Represented Litigants Project, 2017","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographics; Focus group; Order (exchange); Mediation","score_opus":0.15545203268385666,"score_gpt":0.37924830736951054,"score_spread":0.22379627468565388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043704403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87159044,0.00007386899,0.0000135005275,0.047608335,0.00076239044,0.0004885313,0.00078523427,0.00013792032,0.07853976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904243,0.0000462943,0.0007736412,0.00055902003,0.00069221697,0.0000014371153,0.00017301667,0.000017956643,0.0073121344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959839,0.0011817042,0.00035466367,0.000605399,0.001457219,0.00041712928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954922,0.0009591191,0.0007237145,0.0013020692,0.0013882631,0.00013461254],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027101557,0.00020416532,0.00026012017,0.00023484215,0.0027759755,0.00020278017,0.0034216926,0.0002255246,0.0019286352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002017391,0.00017130948,0.00015744726,0.002359923,0.0011376132,0.0026881783,0.0008678448,0.0007481153,0.00014292398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005979038,0.002670149,0.40322855,0.000053359963,0.0019415158,0.000011298654,0.35493478,0.000006642487,0.005377257,0.021307986,0.2066739,0.003196643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010356904,0.000051174364,0.4818507,0.00007202006,0.00020888068,0.0000047381714,0.027419403,0.00012979883,0.0006023325,0.0013227563,0.487009,0.00029349138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008575549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00912587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3275154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023166409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019653677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043710957","doi":"","title":"Smith-Doheny Legal Ethics Award","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Legal ethics; Legal writing; Legal research; Legal practice; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.07817725767613355,"score_gpt":0.48301902980483824,"score_spread":0.4048417721287047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043710957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00087432406,0.000020814623,0.0013563813,0.39544442,0.00087758,0.0000467755,4.659962e-7,0.0000637793,0.60131544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.570169,0.000047883623,0.0014230567,0.019851819,0.0001727482,0.000009313605,0.0000015470464,0.0000023155176,0.40832233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999326,0.00015885866,0.000111827816,0.00009256016,0.00018483259,0.00012594537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990204,0.0005512738,0.000030249334,0.00010758398,0.0002518531,0.00003863259],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010510297,0.00003644701,0.00004412562,0.00007550366,0.0007035419,0.00025313924,0.00013950538,0.000096671894,0.0014904831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002840873,0.000034676134,0.000022953944,0.00073775067,0.000116904856,0.0004943774,0.000016333177,0.00048288732,0.00025578594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012153805,0.000023118388,0.0006122269,0.0000023578712,0.000005102696,1.846492e-7,0.004924628,5.014963e-7,0.0000067411297,0.84894675,0.14368318,0.0017939641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045985245,0.0000024370675,0.0011759987,0.0000047441517,0.0000051522334,9.833396e-8,0.008908439,0.000004764868,0.000046785623,0.0071429587,0.98262,0.00004261144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014164598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048110634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84180385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006565644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033849557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7046093385","doi":"","title":"The Cost of Experiencing Everyday Legal Problems Related to Loss of Employment and Loss of Housing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Job loss; Legal service; Legal action; Civil rights","score_opus":0.03480891559127124,"score_gpt":0.35279341763024463,"score_spread":0.3179845020389734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7046093385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9615447,0.00011778906,0.000038190472,0.010389976,0.00044282124,0.00037556852,0.0000075978674,0.0000136379085,0.027069751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977032,0.000053141946,0.0002663387,0.00013856302,0.000047777583,0.000020311783,0.0000010322525,0.0000074857935,0.0017621776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988386,0.00012363787,0.00038263426,0.00013986709,0.00033460616,0.00018067838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984893,0.0002169679,0.00048756914,0.0003622165,0.0003462389,0.00009770675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011973785,0.00007151691,0.00014804659,0.000036462312,0.0011045246,0.0002122989,0.00032789024,0.00006182877,0.0000895228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013384033,0.00005859424,0.000034353267,0.00021115762,0.0006370186,0.00081732805,0.00007740337,0.00017590959,0.000006944358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000723156,0.00022457201,0.085543685,0.00005779113,0.00008378933,0.0000027193912,0.08484645,0.000118204094,0.0054827803,0.81727856,0.0016686965,0.0046204287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009065402,0.00017773025,0.047299918,0.0003779983,0.000051736286,0.0000046792356,0.031463552,0.000025796659,0.014908627,0.0043829917,0.90004563,0.00035478408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032033376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010604147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89837694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057976384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041252075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9744124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066909228","doi":"","title":"Investigating genetic aberrations in metastatic gastric cancer and in primary renal cell carcinoma","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill Genome Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Cancer; Renal cell carcinoma; Metastasis; Gene; Somatic cell; Mutation; Kidney cancer; Germline mutation; Primary tumor","score_opus":0.034773320511871736,"score_gpt":0.314267104014707,"score_spread":0.27949378350283527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066909228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8460328,0.0005363736,1.3498362e-7,0.0006030522,0.00067624124,0.0006251895,0.00022414862,0.000043602235,0.15125844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839318,0.00051722385,0.001702782,0.00057388813,0.00008077343,0.00041812228,0.00020905402,0.000065728615,0.012500672],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634326,0.00079422,0.0009292288,0.00068921276,0.0006404977,0.0006035602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777,0.00065915956,0.00066225894,0.0002887316,0.00034973279,0.0002700847],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013346586,0.00037190833,0.0004287945,0.00089509477,0.0012018905,0.0001986037,0.0003547384,0.00034826403,0.00038647206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018695398,0.00039080041,0.000074754105,0.0018940476,0.00014097613,0.0014744232,0.0000454291,0.0014598173,0.00005466731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002770948,0.0018433157,0.056082174,0.0020694167,0.00025056946,0.00018215064,0.008381098,0.00023464853,0.1660508,0.19017535,0.00031936757,0.574134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044428953,0.00018722471,0.7353052,0.001990804,0.00053024915,0.000021728512,0.015553821,0.000043000982,0.010018168,0.06677625,0.1617334,0.0033972883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019488433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.110266075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.679223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013234306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014831396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067035755","doi":"","title":"La pratique rebelle du droit dans les facultés de droit québécoises : un cadre d'enseignement clinique alternatif","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Archipelago (Université du Québec à Montréal)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.01209868251711465,"score_gpt":0.24484515808408128,"score_spread":0.23274647556696662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067035755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25447,0.0029583802,0.0062514246,0.09951776,0.0009596061,0.00083526614,0.0001507456,0.00030678336,0.63455003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57108235,0.003839513,0.0018748528,0.0013880408,0.0009022801,0.00005191617,0.000058675017,0.00024489424,0.42055747],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601245,0.0010992336,0.0006222705,0.00091031846,0.00064245955,0.00071326527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686104,0.0011540455,0.00065800035,0.00058831443,0.00027689745,0.0004616782],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010504741,0.00060308387,0.0005548965,0.00047434878,0.0013897447,0.0003107832,0.001055196,0.00071077957,0.016710712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006129992,0.00070867746,0.0004036667,0.0010135947,0.0009585329,0.00058760634,0.0003100571,0.0018670976,0.0022154418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043997814,0.0004298574,0.0012520398,0.000119424454,0.0005274111,0.00040392258,0.57947046,0.00005463576,0.00007633271,0.30811974,0.050400883,0.059101276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000398826,0.00011152024,0.0028238236,0.00025748488,0.00041488904,0.00008140787,0.18835537,0.00034587542,0.000025880763,0.010139102,0.79641646,0.000629326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94283366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98213255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7460156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035054819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008595111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067480187","doi":"","title":"McMurtry Visiting Clinical Fellowship Another First in Experiential Education at Osgoode Hall Law School","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Mentorship; Curriculum; Honour; Experiential education","score_opus":0.05372560965777874,"score_gpt":0.38891670494437497,"score_spread":0.33519109528659624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067480187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3865206,0.00041951463,0.00003892212,0.017890254,0.0045163576,0.00042073935,0.0000061688543,0.00012694146,0.5900605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694887,0.000042354084,0.0011957983,0.010803279,0.004087455,0.00011118907,0.000031084754,0.000031321957,0.014208835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972525,0.0006435909,0.00066427345,0.00036409753,0.00046048287,0.00061501394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981315,0.00051599613,0.00029061583,0.00039942435,0.00019535888,0.00046706633],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024367678,0.00017748671,0.00021666138,0.000090257316,0.0011700551,0.00040184453,0.0003395619,0.00028911507,0.0085229175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019838293,0.00019359746,0.00011286794,0.0005883696,0.0003354518,0.002565575,0.00008354513,0.000772659,0.0027676478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046032714,0.0008694623,0.16310516,0.000015758857,0.00002071314,0.0000011761601,0.013514188,0.0000032860366,0.000120618315,0.7881537,0.033053234,0.0010966781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039065786,0.000017993596,0.0144976275,0.000051909174,0.000016506505,0.0000024209844,0.009248185,0.000004769939,0.00015231641,0.0018673132,0.9734659,0.00028440088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076381914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1401806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94041264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047068775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097353425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070641044","doi":"","title":"Private Lines of Credit for Law Students and Medical Students: A Canadian Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Debt; Legislation","score_opus":0.03970751450400037,"score_gpt":0.4129046680962798,"score_spread":0.37319715359227945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070641044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6558396,0.00020976715,0.000041266514,0.16648239,0.0021386396,0.0010710902,0.00010182686,0.00005026296,0.17406514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323875,0.000056552923,0.00039725198,0.0030535834,0.0007190248,0.000050858507,0.000005322829,0.000009089145,0.0024695776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984752,0.00008617713,0.00020549177,0.00020104754,0.00078536465,0.00024670464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983759,0.000198484,0.00018737746,0.00027747994,0.0005018353,0.00045895766],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014364375,0.00008229347,0.00014394883,0.000049527232,0.0017552786,0.0008388431,0.0009565969,0.000116148694,0.0004974113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049544256,0.00008070988,0.00003643079,0.000094007206,0.0005779774,0.0008553302,0.000097595366,0.0002356522,0.000026514583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012984332,0.00010021935,0.04363351,0.000006755093,0.00004808409,0.000002132533,0.0050941287,1.0478539e-7,0.000007458766,0.9468296,0.0041311975,0.00013377954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075080583,0.00005351174,0.04763892,0.000053474414,0.000034237735,0.0000010405748,0.009052599,0.0000030689416,0.000039641494,0.017189527,0.92503333,0.00014982087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78090346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89579123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9296401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017000276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010903879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070722958","doi":"","title":"One Year of Law School Credit","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Work (physics); Constitutional law; Common law","score_opus":0.03591264089864942,"score_gpt":0.33066824567556535,"score_spread":0.2947556047769159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070722958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03060414,0.000047653393,0.00014606635,0.02297474,0.0010178755,0.0001862796,0.000010768788,0.00010347911,0.944909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806537,0.000019543382,0.0024038006,0.004277693,0.0013623381,0.000017914183,0.000011584029,0.000013545731,0.011239868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985655,0.0002542865,0.00028505633,0.0001901486,0.00045365392,0.00025136376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998644,0.00027152337,0.00017449338,0.00033338723,0.00032531377,0.0002512949],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001136127,0.000083503706,0.00015328442,0.00005164276,0.00048090788,0.0001992265,0.0003144202,0.000118542055,0.0065072575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00201553,0.000093260336,0.000057331265,0.0004093746,0.00031187854,0.000930074,0.000034353263,0.00039608314,0.0022811252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007810164,0.00009540056,0.0008802975,0.000008136684,0.000013985457,1.2839895e-7,0.00092101574,0.0000022740737,0.0003106372,0.97986376,0.017506646,0.0003899313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022661718,0.000031134234,0.0019674841,0.000020447154,0.00001623076,1.8337353e-7,0.0008043178,0.0000032330609,0.00050946895,0.017466007,0.9788351,0.000119757075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030900678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010195493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96239775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075410004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046169944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071279485","doi":"","title":"Social and Economic Adversity Experienced by Canadians and Everyday Legal Problems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social justice; Social issues; Social policy; Everyday life","score_opus":0.02277721156648885,"score_gpt":0.3137092889428574,"score_spread":0.2909320773763685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071279485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8046948,0.00007111456,0.000011600329,0.03331485,0.0004840006,0.00018476055,0.00002775781,0.00004657965,0.16116454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98787755,0.000021055932,0.000102410275,0.002357202,0.00051869027,0.000013563303,0.0000062454687,0.000005801921,0.009097491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992351,0.00009071168,0.00012239054,0.00020690475,0.00010939527,0.0002355314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995015,0.00005721912,0.000070641996,0.00007932206,0.000072817136,0.00021844491],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034453438,0.00007458522,0.00008689129,0.00003198512,0.001630601,0.00034896092,0.000115641655,0.00008326461,0.0009906808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117991534,0.00008404831,0.000015299302,0.00012799831,0.0006574677,0.0012455841,0.000027072656,0.0001682341,0.000101487974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017500744,0.000047179416,0.011512024,0.000008278526,0.00002854728,0.0000013595882,0.07765462,3.927533e-7,0.00041120662,0.6684241,0.24047641,0.0014183201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016802912,0.000021805958,0.0022578107,0.0000028179236,0.000006473171,0.0000012973645,0.008319353,0.0000056753297,0.000058961334,0.00073692907,0.98829895,0.00012192212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44548416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48595002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7478225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016720923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068837096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071335482","doi":"","title":"Social, Economic and Health Problems Associated with a Lack of Access to the Courts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Process (computing); Social issues; Health problems; Legislation","score_opus":0.09216274526292727,"score_gpt":0.39135271409296835,"score_spread":0.29918996883004106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071335482","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35312995,0.00014832268,0.000040479277,0.5365003,0.00024694946,0.000849129,0.000035439953,0.00007038943,0.108979076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99146545,0.000017525796,0.00007320792,0.00561517,0.00025176952,0.000036895126,0.0000122739075,0.000008310081,0.002519392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907845,0.00017442106,0.00022026186,0.00014165031,0.00017854851,0.00020668829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929816,0.000131134,0.00025692678,0.00010469772,0.00012760209,0.000081513484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011953384,0.00006753229,0.00012879142,0.000034797657,0.00084460934,0.00037380835,0.00020618392,0.000047335117,0.00020120233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011151074,0.000052303887,0.000018283581,0.00029554885,0.00017016927,0.00059175404,0.000027875336,0.00017283672,0.000037312162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007888128,0.0001242479,0.024753688,0.0000129346145,0.000033220982,1.9706214e-7,0.007034752,0.00014175735,0.0000074553896,0.7310644,0.23634134,0.00047815012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028164862,0.000049235732,0.09771026,0.000032956126,0.000012560167,4.4066496e-7,0.0013704383,0.000009103093,0.000015275175,0.0060361577,0.8943566,0.00012532176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11011285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30039808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7250282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018521874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010084728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.895813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071505723","doi":"","title":"The sea coast resorts of eastern Maine, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Cape Breton.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cape; Nova scotia; West coast; Nova (rocket); Sea coast","score_opus":0.010741166629984297,"score_gpt":0.23778256879133441,"score_spread":0.2270414021613501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071505723","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2003611,0.0000293999,0.001027728,0.6304217,0.0005042187,0.00030432118,0.00001237118,0.00011041501,0.16722871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7622533,0.00014485246,0.00092259806,0.00060447585,0.00019251156,8.380646e-8,0.000010069635,0.000011676507,0.23586045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988312,0.0003227383,0.00012475379,0.00020884445,0.0002692488,0.00024321888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880296,0.00046516996,0.00019297408,0.00026143118,0.00009279833,0.00018468438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023569993,0.000106739186,0.00012946904,0.00010650995,0.0005443081,0.00019066705,0.00035921772,0.00009187396,0.00032242836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023726061,0.000099381235,0.000043066506,0.00064778817,0.00035642288,0.0014496397,0.0001405492,0.00026165103,0.00004768984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008143953,0.000052594532,0.4707952,0.000018156477,0.00003423659,0.0000045399556,0.007751395,0.0000072508683,0.000002206933,0.20307411,0.31587812,0.0023007407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002521955,0.000030885283,0.050365604,0.000022834607,0.000019229865,2.1848342e-7,0.0056709573,0.0000058000346,0.0000610942,0.00041560718,0.9430304,0.0001251537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23735654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08988088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62981725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034209454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015728412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9267264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072238920","doi":"","title":"Where Are We Going? The Past and Future of Canadian Scholarship on Legal Ethics for Government Lawyers","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Scholarship; Strengths and weaknesses; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.05960965493264662,"score_gpt":0.33845792100957817,"score_spread":0.27884826607693153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7072238920","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010424345,0.009618613,0.0000059159293,0.88274276,0.003540595,0.0003044236,0.0003384415,0.000011742256,0.09301316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7753428,0.016885329,0.0019456947,0.066096686,0.0074405535,0.00010749521,0.00003887721,0.000062864805,0.13207969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775887,0.0006060663,0.00029864538,0.00030240582,0.0006348638,0.00039912423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751467,0.0010225456,0.00026407235,0.0003323906,0.0004899498,0.00037637298],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016257688,0.00016501313,0.00018099611,0.00004396881,0.0015485173,0.00059080624,0.00026402442,0.00036898546,0.0011493819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010639074,0.00015057035,0.00009142805,0.0010306644,0.00045243028,0.000849883,0.00003317072,0.0016890379,0.00007060562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001642562,0.0000767846,0.002344047,0.00013103272,0.00005155557,0.0000057875245,0.0057590343,0.0000070165734,0.000020742058,0.9214563,0.067119904,0.003011401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024001252,0.000046546345,0.0020049263,0.00022492307,0.000058049307,0.0000050763756,0.032705136,0.0000043600103,0.000103343,0.002500996,0.96194106,0.00016557075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13771361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8943974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91895527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045667618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002918999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093388594","doi":"","title":"In Brief","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Tribunal; The arts; Law library; Internship; Legal education; Class (philosophy)","score_opus":0.053400833042335186,"score_gpt":0.4113521397460682,"score_spread":0.35795130670373304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093388594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004886737,0.00007388632,0.00007139028,0.1253056,0.0019133337,0.00010629384,4.0460418e-7,0.000009403064,0.867633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82289577,0.00011159113,0.0004783518,0.008600015,0.000101872014,0.0000056063714,2.9821675e-7,0.0000034191423,0.16780311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880224,0.0003743333,0.00024605586,0.00015223511,0.0001905258,0.00023463344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993856,0.00024276336,0.00006831591,0.0001203305,0.00010573716,0.000077280674],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012441367,0.00006174465,0.00007255617,0.0001026515,0.00024601415,0.00022023387,0.00009916541,0.00008733514,0.08532807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002133534,0.00006642802,0.000024236411,0.001863661,0.000118834425,0.0013679025,0.0000054425977,0.000315036,0.0013286829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.049299e-7,0.00015858335,0.0013079297,0.0000014448,0.0000022829408,8.9783566e-7,0.014706054,8.5047265e-7,0.000007628176,0.9311201,0.05202263,0.0006706918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013323923,0.000007575862,0.0007720509,0.00000312907,0.0000027851372,8.2728104e-7,0.017101124,0.0000040814566,0.000074864874,0.0154705485,0.9663386,0.00009120702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010865057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005480332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91564953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009796699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017238599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094500861","doi":"","title":"Reforming Ontarioâs Family Justice System: An Evidence-Based Approach","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Face (sociological concept); Public policy","score_opus":0.10527516500801436,"score_gpt":0.30914356931419057,"score_spread":0.2038684043061762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094500861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9121015,0.00054977526,0.0007705193,0.011845272,0.001673754,0.001426257,0.000051954143,0.00020469015,0.07137629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98151183,0.00010876062,0.006171726,0.00095989124,0.00045236148,0.0000058163882,0.0000854403,0.000047479014,0.010656703],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99315965,0.0020159942,0.00075292983,0.0011678512,0.0018246078,0.0010789487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933506,0.0008629787,0.0013689586,0.0012834896,0.00218025,0.00095371285],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004501889,0.0005379656,0.0007205687,0.0007751414,0.0051721428,0.00071887416,0.0022376103,0.00087239203,0.0036159153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012571783,0.0006739978,0.0003840353,0.0030472663,0.0011283823,0.019124284,0.0003248565,0.0020385415,0.0017039493],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034183026,0.009378971,0.16402905,0.01043829,0.0017871535,0.00015994717,0.56553835,0.0022206376,0.050898153,0.1324144,0.015546017,0.044170707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024840408,0.0006512116,0.24807699,0.0014983881,0.0024170182,0.000021196229,0.6872271,0.003195582,0.00038434836,0.00030851338,0.051881153,0.0018545048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07655937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044148746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13210589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020703229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041720895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094505303","doi":"","title":"In Brief","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Gray (unit); Graduation (instrument); Legal education; Higher education; Schedule; Commission","score_opus":0.0470361165926436,"score_gpt":0.4124711099664566,"score_spread":0.36543499337381297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094505303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012233221,0.00003656981,0.000117239295,0.38704836,0.0012049315,0.00009018144,5.212398e-7,0.000011708774,0.5992573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94418746,0.00012404057,0.00065364107,0.013889548,0.00032598077,0.000005898818,7.334561e-7,0.0000038091196,0.040808905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990902,0.00007823052,0.0002442068,0.00015199519,0.00020981011,0.00022553647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995455,0.00009653845,0.0000675556,0.00011352398,0.00009940633,0.000077489465],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006216649,0.000061705636,0.00007081496,0.00011193289,0.00024687985,0.00023114018,0.000143948,0.00008878527,0.019904783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060831377,0.000066192726,0.000025693835,0.0017878661,0.00014894767,0.0017835526,0.0000148553145,0.00033515005,0.0016992723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022381507,0.00024066636,0.0002506732,0.0000017787285,0.000002505218,0.0000021055805,0.03499617,0.000021454267,0.000014334891,0.9553759,0.007884885,0.0012072626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003283335,0.00001413557,0.0020090884,0.000009099345,0.0000030851747,8.848979e-7,0.015084383,0.0000019476836,0.00008389273,0.053646196,0.9287188,0.000100148114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07801805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022000453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9319542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023993436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024663364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094531802","doi":"","title":"on Lenzner '04 Appointed Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.042112390132274816,"score_gpt":0.33935225375913897,"score_spread":0.29723986362686416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094531802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060386635,0.0025942482,0.0033096604,0.28868943,0.011518106,0.0020105452,0.00047458816,0.00011786565,0.6308989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97295094,0.0002738467,0.00046736893,0.0053045065,0.0011487604,0.00007831008,0.000060620903,0.000028292901,0.01968738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973668,0.00044134687,0.00067145034,0.000454442,0.0005921949,0.00047375078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929627,0.0047378885,0.000595691,0.0005964129,0.0009014819,0.0002058151],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016079298,0.00022881324,0.0003058519,0.00005598512,0.0017686517,0.0005959224,0.00047760556,0.00019989925,0.0061711646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007572302,0.00018662667,0.00025025563,0.0014730025,0.00037497754,0.00081672246,0.00008433376,0.0008509607,0.00022893341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000153786,0.0005468169,0.0004575464,0.000095153126,0.00022472304,0.0000033208375,0.0057699815,0.000058648726,0.00065314694,0.8957697,0.084259674,0.012007474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062824314,0.00008411518,0.0011622482,0.000107481435,0.00013823247,0.0000025406223,0.011902791,0.000119645345,0.0021857757,0.003070329,0.980348,0.00025059484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006759838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004807896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9125643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018049662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019727056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094752365","doi":"","title":"Criminal Law: Canadian Law, Indigenous Laws & Critical Perspectives","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Criminalization; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Prison; Mental health; Poverty","score_opus":0.04254389750772586,"score_gpt":0.36088963919654404,"score_spread":0.3183457416888182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094752365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04671869,0.00089799793,0.00000974621,0.15049273,0.004965761,0.00069833855,0.00027481077,0.00034146768,0.7956005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96230096,0.00024854945,0.00031734744,0.016780585,0.0026463678,0.00010196895,0.00006360207,0.00006495887,0.017475678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944889,0.00087697944,0.0007331648,0.00093569554,0.0010674059,0.0018978768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948527,0.0011310196,0.00018799742,0.0006990267,0.0011358778,0.0019933756],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021241228,0.00043645367,0.0004367428,0.00033404925,0.007404304,0.0025116727,0.00092079845,0.00053281407,0.015645292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027793364,0.000514252,0.0002329716,0.00277042,0.0026299448,0.002993169,0.00011243072,0.0019499806,0.014518034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016531187,0.00021032398,0.0002588124,0.000039600156,0.000060104572,0.00008188096,0.10475981,0.00000530127,0.00002864415,0.87380606,0.020392004,0.00034090652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024210085,0.00010584787,0.0012812478,0.000053367,0.00012840712,0.000013981667,0.14774066,0.000012839205,0.000045313067,0.02405449,0.82575756,0.0005642019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95790863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9791863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91558224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013218814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007614123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095253457","doi":"","title":"LSAC RESEARCH REPORT SERIES � Predictive Validity of Accommodated LSAT Scores for the 2002–2006 Entering Law School Classes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Accreditation; Longitudinal study; Predictive validity","score_opus":0.22437028711180823,"score_gpt":0.4936011573379955,"score_spread":0.26923087022618725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095253457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051391527,0.00014010597,0.0022313113,0.20313427,0.0010948234,0.0017672733,0.00006102365,0.00019497517,0.7399847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837199,0.00008608537,0.0008238314,0.0005822659,0.00036034017,0.000060395625,0.000014167711,0.000005326478,0.014347686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998466,0.00030252826,0.00030789568,0.00017061603,0.0004944189,0.00025849798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698377,0.0012649257,0.00015589387,0.00028509655,0.0012388364,0.00007147917],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033385076,0.000067462395,0.00010542409,0.00008087261,0.0012254246,0.00028787408,0.0003041054,0.00007110981,0.0010425298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054224855,0.000048870406,0.000047350728,0.00071756815,0.00044541547,0.0013757839,0.00003421071,0.00031212994,0.000016543876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016365045,0.0003376163,0.006342658,0.000016242944,0.000058292306,0.0000029500432,0.0069626537,0.000030062442,0.00092293747,0.69659805,0.28681862,0.0017462525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014883067,0.00015505009,0.024287067,0.000023326738,0.000020187477,0.000005531788,0.017215194,0.000042685744,0.003265937,0.015036428,0.9397024,0.00009734526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009360398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00767474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9323284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008762307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087455276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095524496","doi":"","title":"� LSAT Listening Assessment: Theoretical Background and Specifications","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Corporation; Active listening; Voting; Legal education; Public law","score_opus":0.1341573661874814,"score_gpt":0.4396917456960025,"score_spread":0.30553437950852114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095524496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01088114,0.000019115358,0.0035262774,0.039440382,0.00022141989,0.00008161629,6.835439e-7,0.000040012477,0.94578934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97236526,0.000048477894,0.012631203,0.00087730103,0.000084881525,0.000008789916,0.000002530041,0.0000037897748,0.013977769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993131,0.00019662785,0.00011041809,0.00011065901,0.00014529233,0.00012388694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928117,0.0003966341,0.00003490271,0.000098290446,0.00010826088,0.00008071685],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007725395,0.000040142473,0.00004364071,0.000040905477,0.00064471795,0.0003343379,0.000058046313,0.000039394166,0.008590437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000519999,0.00003699665,0.000013021339,0.00032397438,0.00034100757,0.00044814282,0.000006309868,0.00015169967,0.00007843812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.4556453e-7,0.00002941459,0.0012731141,6.280236e-7,0.0000030034078,1.2955802e-7,0.002223804,1.070028e-7,0.00002670679,0.9935819,0.002291247,0.00056962814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006430907,0.0000052555974,0.0039460706,0.0000016270586,0.0000065468466,0.0000017557222,0.023694402,0.000011459987,0.000015109809,0.0593642,0.91282386,0.00006541379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022957555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016643504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96148413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042595984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003691045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095849741","doi":"","title":"� Fear of Falling: The Effects of U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report Rankings on U.S. Law Schools","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Discretion; Public law; Accreditation; Common law; Law reform","score_opus":0.04682434543987745,"score_gpt":0.38997320917765893,"score_spread":0.3431488637377815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095849741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16728832,0.000037211295,0.000650888,0.035569668,0.0008383062,0.00038036407,6.417455e-7,0.000044503904,0.7951901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524767,0.000021118023,0.002318877,0.0031723022,0.00021433501,0.000006315276,0.000004779931,0.0000069384646,0.04177863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869376,0.00012079333,0.00040194698,0.00013290068,0.00047091482,0.00017965044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743843,0.0014845602,0.00037379144,0.00031955668,0.00032321608,0.00006042701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025757418,0.000069697395,0.00012584939,0.00010896816,0.00030789938,0.00006963807,0.0002183958,0.000056414934,0.00054895075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003779203,0.000049487826,0.000066641114,0.0010608267,0.00020973402,0.0002860557,0.000016745267,0.0003111605,0.00010626416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028542076,0.00022137158,0.005707871,0.000023250583,0.000029159379,0.0000020621992,0.008916534,0.000003270135,0.0016649443,0.93800366,0.04253769,0.0028616257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012141105,0.000012126203,0.0035517896,0.00002935663,0.000014928896,0.0000011610932,0.0013616288,1.49327e-7,0.0026152593,0.003814708,0.988411,0.00006645883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03202605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061787378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9458733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044907818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003399012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9744198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096165303","doi":"","title":"Canadian Forum on Civil Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.10299123569326385,"score_gpt":0.409955210299924,"score_spread":0.30696397460666014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096165303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085548364,0.000003365109,0.00002620044,0.31236866,0.0007414185,0.000036450998,0.0000010283784,0.000023009172,0.6859444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88889396,0.0000022196994,0.00021248135,0.022037525,0.00022088159,0.0000040980417,0.0000026928774,0.0000023286527,0.088623784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995413,0.00004771875,0.000051296312,0.000056677523,0.00014689015,0.00015613447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993656,0.00008581618,0.000017194217,0.00007089252,0.00016585174,0.00029462588],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039920575,0.00002482333,0.0000230134,0.00006710514,0.00032939162,0.0001109616,0.00008386094,0.00003265288,0.0019868298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014716127,0.000023274002,0.000007549757,0.0003176618,0.000025651978,0.0002880647,0.0000030638769,0.000094576375,0.0014703028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.961818e-7,0.0000072892317,0.0002720464,1.769157e-7,7.9432493e-7,2.7564374e-7,0.0038624662,0.0000014730165,2.0491241e-7,0.53513664,0.45993835,0.00077967846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036934285,0.000008572725,0.00014562625,7.967058e-7,0.000003573183,1.5864107e-7,0.03626389,0.0000062109475,0.0000030157607,0.0032512182,0.96024394,0.000036058354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83710176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97851807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8880385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025118893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037493275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096239523","doi":"","title":"American Bar Foundation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Corporation; Work (physics); Bar (unit); Corporate law","score_opus":0.04508817845141043,"score_gpt":0.4353904496805197,"score_spread":0.39030227122910927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096239523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016017333,0.0000015523867,0.0009167042,0.2530497,0.00012309726,0.00003606382,1.0284446e-7,0.000054725017,0.7298007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95248073,0.000011513376,0.0055819144,0.0049723783,0.0004347661,0.0000045905344,0.0000025623037,0.0000017117821,0.036509834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966854,0.00004427611,0.000059899543,0.000048496982,0.00010562113,0.000073168354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973196,0.00006772108,0.000035591114,0.000050575516,0.0000794982,0.0000346713],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025218917,0.000018370612,0.000021702128,0.000028982315,0.00026786138,0.00010511319,0.00005167203,0.000009538202,0.008917402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000309814,0.000017844764,0.00000887399,0.00030554296,0.000086540575,0.0006168532,0.0000031412694,0.000055782602,0.0021717823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.332059e-7,0.000025194906,0.0007713363,1.2492706e-7,0.0000015878912,1.7775296e-8,0.0052881665,0.000001893808,0.000018177421,0.7626487,0.026273469,0.20497058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001975853,0.0000034259745,0.0022085258,2.3153584e-7,0.0000012427955,7.544732e-8,0.0049017062,0.000018427258,0.0000213534,0.0004316525,0.99236506,0.000028524419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006836939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058888323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96609163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055050445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025104743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096496586","doi":"","title":"The PIAC project research team consists of the following members:","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internship; Government (linguistics); Task (project management); Variety (cybernetics); Subject (documents); Research program","score_opus":0.36847337550027565,"score_gpt":0.5549110713269271,"score_spread":0.18643769582665143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096496586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02526832,0.00004227431,0.0000028451886,0.10151705,0.0007605369,0.00026257947,4.163189e-7,0.000015841932,0.87213016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454207,0.000008303563,0.00015172164,0.0003170139,0.00010877486,0.000019077095,2.5737134e-7,0.0000025589054,0.053971615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982614,0.0007419834,0.00012484571,0.000068317306,0.00064117194,0.00016231628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787945,0.0012676553,0.000053735374,0.00020279316,0.000559125,0.000037254184],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006792182,0.00002696312,0.00003916694,0.000035027253,0.0010675426,0.00018353543,0.00031143604,0.00003249752,0.00007144789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010758856,0.000013648579,0.000036544534,0.0011414918,0.00036906207,0.00028079216,0.000047452246,0.0002459409,0.00003265299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040994123,0.000034220113,0.0025219135,9.683565e-7,0.000012317054,7.028889e-8,0.04400606,4.0532788e-7,0.000022029644,0.51659983,0.43578193,0.0010161495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052158073,0.0000068707045,0.00021511548,0.0000036825002,0.0000029371356,1.4485867e-7,0.11729015,0.0000047339668,0.00008413656,0.0037738886,0.8785454,0.000020771238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027361961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012616551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92015237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078410914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035954118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096571373","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Corporation; Table of contents; Voting; Table (database)","score_opus":0.08352293535879743,"score_gpt":0.41309412692643327,"score_spread":0.3295711915676358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096571373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028903002,0.000007838791,0.00045500693,0.048872843,0.00020809316,0.000040922863,6.1418496e-7,0.000016699712,0.92149496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98099977,0.0000061874694,0.0009679278,0.00072711083,0.000029972367,0.0000014333035,6.317311e-7,7.570454e-7,0.01726619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997837,0.0000114177,0.000054430595,0.000025235233,0.00007970715,0.00004552047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977833,0.000026042817,0.000027386215,0.0000347227,0.00011501765,0.000018478806],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013472163,0.000010807236,0.00002080737,0.00001668451,0.00008594699,0.000017010903,0.000042682892,0.000013229238,0.0014562085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003204321,0.000009782532,0.000006390236,0.0002337982,0.00004368676,0.00025026678,0.0000026723199,0.000031056177,0.00007417124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.4483856e-7,0.0000382796,0.0007279747,4.7755117e-7,0.0000016944981,3.7495184e-8,0.00384954,0.0000025620895,0.00020768611,0.9913917,0.0034638518,0.00031555272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012044209,0.000005906255,0.0015122601,0.000002195034,0.0000017283633,8.6723674e-8,0.008834888,2.3775024e-7,0.0014090501,0.010636502,0.9774533,0.000023390056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023883307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020173881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9807552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013298721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028791575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096642171","doi":"","title":"BARBARA ARMACOST ∑ Appreciating the Impacts and Limits","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regent; Chose; Working life; Practice of law; Common law; Labour law","score_opus":0.12309078004496407,"score_gpt":0.4266686275429229,"score_spread":0.3035778474979588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096642171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07653654,0.000096690565,0.000052703028,0.12310184,0.0002884735,0.00009264779,3.6661723e-7,0.000038995346,0.79979175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883921,0.000033777924,0.00034134308,0.0041918065,0.00031061427,0.000005020979,7.540097e-7,0.0000023794166,0.0067221844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994918,0.00011568438,0.00007219622,0.00005684862,0.00015510347,0.0001083627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934244,0.00031687555,0.00004285293,0.000060078848,0.00013281316,0.000104920495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001108702,0.000029766945,0.00002884613,0.000019233335,0.00038821873,0.00025602922,0.000077601966,0.000023728295,0.00019785152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024472352,0.000019472043,0.000007161196,0.00028072437,0.0000706481,0.0004890395,0.00001115051,0.0001269775,0.00007705519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065194877,0.000054170247,0.016123531,0.0000028211796,0.0000148824065,3.9467434e-7,0.13551234,0.0000053448066,0.00010146793,0.4792187,0.3410277,0.027932117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080176535,0.0000066365305,0.0038873237,0.0000020902312,0.0000048200122,8.062244e-7,0.03345939,0.000044631186,0.000038184044,0.0013946557,0.96103615,0.000045149685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041089915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016380417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9118556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030140589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045702924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6211593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096832485","doi":"","title":"� A Report on the Inclusion of Diverse Speakers on the LSAT Listening Comprehension Assessment: A Survey of the Literature with Recommendations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Voting; Active listening; Legal education; Corporation","score_opus":0.07619375317350818,"score_gpt":0.3956607764570823,"score_spread":0.3194670232835741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096832485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.542509,0.00000556299,0.00008020234,0.33959165,0.0003660815,0.00048480683,0.000018813334,0.00001711749,0.116926774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99555814,0.000014940886,0.00034640255,0.0025747123,0.000029313422,0.0000075335383,0.000024486795,0.0000043689533,0.0014401117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836284,0.00070077996,0.00023247405,0.00012100177,0.0004895722,0.00009334726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972209,0.0014738247,0.00039517728,0.0003618245,0.0005252526,0.000023060935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023061722,0.00007199522,0.0000832583,0.00004657926,0.0017037136,0.00008949758,0.0002717268,0.00004434484,0.00029432616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013931398,0.00002932255,0.00004096173,0.0012999818,0.00021662058,0.00021982344,0.00012338355,0.0003658454,0.0000031300515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009835297,0.00060394563,0.020523041,0.000009579557,0.00007133724,0.0000029823616,0.115379944,0.0003783665,0.0003696414,0.8451512,0.016186688,0.0012249402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092995435,0.00036173858,0.66869867,0.0011343693,0.000083308434,0.000016130463,0.08693199,0.000079915946,0.0013671204,0.006779706,0.233281,0.00033609802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01467989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010631373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83837146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009098083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064282626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096937300","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Discretion; Accreditation; Table (database); Table of contents","score_opus":0.1466311203043076,"score_gpt":0.40919324450535477,"score_spread":0.2625621242010472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096937300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06298955,0.000009039346,0.00011116972,0.015344752,0.0001730112,0.000032498487,5.4161666e-7,0.000014972196,0.9213245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9188347,0.000021187969,0.0004701543,0.00053727906,0.000031596846,0.0000013163718,6.0561183e-7,7.032662e-7,0.080102496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997641,0.000021011,0.000056729164,0.000025042367,0.00008826856,0.000044851815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997281,0.000051442108,0.000028633995,0.00003623053,0.00013682285,0.000018811412],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001082662,0.000010760527,0.0000232587,0.000017260927,0.00015996388,0.00000621119,0.00004214034,0.000012919306,0.002908883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035917855,0.00000974258,0.00000675679,0.00023234023,0.00007507957,0.00023701078,0.0000027592987,0.000031218933,0.00007464791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020007044,0.00008261269,0.022202337,8.880663e-7,0.000004466228,2.8334773e-7,0.014179905,4.4390427e-7,0.000311468,0.8100659,0.1526398,0.000509882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041848136,0.0000032422884,0.0052377405,5.9022125e-7,7.910859e-7,3.1725608e-7,0.0034818475,0.0000011648033,0.00039117463,0.00035527386,0.9904697,0.000016296908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012069502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005322789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8558451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005765072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022482725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097088449","doi":"","title":"Counsel for the Attorney General of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03690351007707185,"score_gpt":0.3482987278908687,"score_spread":0.31139521781379687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097088449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0350396,0.00003212496,0.0009274539,0.4278119,0.0010664187,0.0004060966,0.0000058292403,0.000011747276,0.53469884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9025468,0.0000074968366,0.00068285165,0.004301188,0.00018598796,0.000043026936,0.0000012326084,0.0000015182923,0.0922299],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971104,0.000017999326,0.00006433745,0.000028876751,0.00010613265,0.00007161981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925387,0.00037183758,0.000035115234,0.000054617813,0.00026188945,0.000022654564],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022232754,0.000015685067,0.000021819335,0.00000564327,0.00026830463,0.000038232603,0.00008406947,0.0000113411115,0.002720751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033458744,0.000010007068,0.000008852939,0.00010728263,0.000040609444,0.00014570507,0.0000021315677,0.000030188754,0.000006779242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.050766e-7,0.0000044137587,0.00018970962,5.37693e-7,0.0000032784537,2.4892053e-9,0.0013412061,0.000002276318,0.000023718698,0.39428324,0.6034063,0.0007450303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024433572,0.0000018999266,0.0023343689,2.610007e-7,0.0000020509513,2.9481894e-8,0.0047222087,0.00008910643,0.00005854565,0.0010368021,0.991713,0.000017291199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9776906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9430068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8675072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003193647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021192273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097196517","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Corporation; Table of contents; Voting; Table (database)","score_opus":0.055471642455260296,"score_gpt":0.3869331211830664,"score_spread":0.33146147872780607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097196517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02043281,0.00000903071,0.00017450075,0.017816685,0.00015077145,0.000030900865,7.349848e-7,0.000014455606,0.9613701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9003326,0.0000017803862,0.00044661743,0.0002667008,0.00005633931,0.0000013024189,0.0000014697799,6.904884e-7,0.09889245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997709,0.000018646904,0.00006238672,0.000024474462,0.00007821388,0.000045386285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976194,0.00004635443,0.00003165528,0.000031723837,0.00011882136,0.000009521912],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013729521,0.000010655656,0.000020571599,0.000016980368,0.00008236878,0.00001981641,0.000036616133,0.000012820633,0.002345863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013955365,0.000009699,0.000006255696,0.00021934992,0.000039536044,0.00020553812,0.0000022377665,0.00002488551,0.000050067832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.003025e-7,0.000035343815,0.0058450005,4.2093822e-7,8.1860003e-7,2.389885e-8,0.0004693276,6.310245e-7,0.00026759785,0.91528165,0.0778566,0.00024208259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003642997,0.0000018751575,0.0051104855,6.381495e-7,0.0000011118264,3.2066428e-8,0.0019482601,0.0000016072105,0.0005317426,0.003595306,0.9887573,0.000015195273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06665689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043300446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91168636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000064407973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118085234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097236508","doi":"","title":"LEGAL AID IN","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Legal action; Government (linguistics); Per capita; Total revenue","score_opus":0.12761044944797922,"score_gpt":0.44923240139238413,"score_spread":0.3216219519444049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097236508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021459423,0.000005785888,0.000046663627,0.09100314,0.0003191299,0.000030377185,9.836178e-8,0.000022666778,0.88711274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9487112,0.0000017639006,0.00071267853,0.0018347104,0.00011366191,0.0000032839143,6.8746476e-7,0.0000010143457,0.048620988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996849,0.000052271578,0.00005385722,0.000037095215,0.000104387,0.000067533736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997938,0.00003986554,0.000012518485,0.00003752492,0.000067825014,0.000048452333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005545898,0.000013888615,0.000019196808,0.000038865033,0.00004955826,0.00007360498,0.000050993174,0.000018488829,0.00084308255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007796714,0.000013046423,0.000004503372,0.00036012728,0.000028513696,0.000574291,0.0000043009254,0.000074197145,0.00037481714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012058365,0.000023515078,0.004064598,1.09552026e-7,3.409892e-7,4.0085698e-7,0.009102038,0.0000011700334,0.0000016912788,0.9219157,0.063746095,0.0011431437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067429384,0.0000027360284,0.0007461315,4.124105e-7,2.8991346e-7,1.4874831e-7,0.014514518,0.000004386522,0.00000675824,0.0029131116,0.98172295,0.000021116724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039669354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022438684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9272518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005067283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007974598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99539924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097517645","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Corporation; Table of contents; Voting; Table (database)","score_opus":0.08389215324917623,"score_gpt":0.421101213522614,"score_spread":0.3372090602734378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097517645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013747512,0.0000110615265,0.00012137034,0.07186583,0.00011018863,0.000031000956,5.2776136e-7,0.00001419064,0.9140983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9158399,0.0000074825302,0.0012776135,0.0011339592,0.00008060792,0.0000013334632,5.48273e-7,7.0881316e-7,0.08165785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997721,0.000018612083,0.000060013102,0.000024607718,0.000078259676,0.00004644282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997583,0.000046285404,0.000028696757,0.00003522914,0.00011304871,0.000018445173],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016918287,0.000010677564,0.000020608768,0.000016851007,0.00007866832,0.000017109314,0.000043987613,0.000012902537,0.0056060767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028386226,0.00000968888,0.0000062028216,0.00018461829,0.000034804758,0.00033459355,0.0000027739668,0.000030914063,0.00014222055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010292298,0.000055484914,0.0021237505,5.031239e-7,0.0000025861475,1.3339752e-8,0.0049893707,0.0000013579785,0.00023558021,0.9073199,0.07878645,0.00648399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003460102,0.0000018525185,0.00075155066,5.9898616e-7,9.796086e-7,3.2580566e-8,0.0031809665,0.000004634527,0.0005125589,0.00028028016,0.9952185,0.000013437514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005319926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023047943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009212324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013646002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097588027","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Discretion; Accreditation; Table (database); Table of contents","score_opus":0.1466311203043076,"score_gpt":0.40919324450535477,"score_spread":0.2625621242010472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097588027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06298955,0.000009039346,0.00011116972,0.015344752,0.0001730112,0.000032498487,5.4161666e-7,0.000014972196,0.9213245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9188347,0.000021187969,0.0004701543,0.00053727906,0.000031596846,0.0000013163718,6.0561183e-7,7.032662e-7,0.080102496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997641,0.000021011,0.000056729164,0.000025042367,0.00008826856,0.000044851815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997281,0.000051442108,0.000028633995,0.00003623053,0.00013682285,0.000018811412],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001082662,0.000010760527,0.0000232587,0.000017260927,0.00015996388,0.00000621119,0.00004214034,0.000012919306,0.002908883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035917855,0.00000974258,0.00000675679,0.00023234023,0.00007507957,0.00023701078,0.0000027592987,0.000031218933,0.00007464791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020007044,0.00008261269,0.022202337,8.880663e-7,0.000004466228,2.8334773e-7,0.014179905,4.4390427e-7,0.000311468,0.8100659,0.1526398,0.000509882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041848136,0.0000032422884,0.0052377405,5.9022125e-7,7.910859e-7,3.1725608e-7,0.0034818475,0.0000011648033,0.00039117463,0.00035527386,0.9904697,0.000016296908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012069502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005322789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8558451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005765072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022482725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097621786","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Discretion; Accreditation; Table (database); Table of contents","score_opus":0.1466311203043076,"score_gpt":0.40919324450535477,"score_spread":0.2625621242010472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097621786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06298955,0.000009039346,0.00011116972,0.015344752,0.0001730112,0.000032498487,5.4161666e-7,0.000014972196,0.9213245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9188347,0.000021187969,0.0004701543,0.00053727906,0.000031596846,0.0000013163718,6.0561183e-7,7.032662e-7,0.080102496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997641,0.000021011,0.000056729164,0.000025042367,0.00008826856,0.000044851815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997281,0.000051442108,0.000028633995,0.00003623053,0.00013682285,0.000018811412],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001082662,0.000010760527,0.0000232587,0.000017260927,0.00015996388,0.00000621119,0.00004214034,0.000012919306,0.002908883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035917855,0.00000974258,0.00000675679,0.00023234023,0.00007507957,0.00023701078,0.0000027592987,0.000031218933,0.00007464791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020007044,0.00008261269,0.022202337,8.880663e-7,0.000004466228,2.8334773e-7,0.014179905,4.4390427e-7,0.000311468,0.8100659,0.1526398,0.000509882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041848136,0.0000032422884,0.0052377405,5.9022125e-7,7.910859e-7,3.1725608e-7,0.0034818475,0.0000011648033,0.00039117463,0.00035527386,0.9904697,0.000016296908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012069502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005322789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8558451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005765072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022482725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098000110","doi":"","title":"Kingdom, and Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Software; Minor (academic); Adobe; Computer software","score_opus":0.060723388692237916,"score_gpt":0.36664424104579013,"score_spread":0.3059208523535522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098000110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2390388,0.0000018657631,0.000025085905,0.068289064,0.00012038344,0.00004909361,2.547013e-8,0.000018615763,0.6924571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8842055,0.00000143357,0.0009614359,0.002031736,0.00004687927,0.000006411269,3.095404e-7,7.712116e-7,0.11274552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998019,0.000017189512,0.000036129266,0.00003666469,0.000053744545,0.00005441536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998088,0.000055584333,0.000012491491,0.00003010431,0.000058137713,0.00003490905],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011931586,0.000014013547,0.00001582637,0.000015342388,0.00019339287,0.00016974162,0.000026464702,0.000015660109,0.020474566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012185344,0.00001204043,0.0000036443298,0.00007958146,0.000040952793,0.0005122658,0.000004788111,0.000060145932,0.00041797006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.7259336e-7,0.0000116823985,0.020090409,2.6785358e-7,0.0000016612117,3.3624573e-8,0.020937625,2.3786946e-8,0.000020260353,0.89040875,0.064190395,0.004338701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019112375,0.0000017985147,0.046048988,3.713477e-7,7.5975805e-7,1.3582856e-7,0.0023899963,8.358593e-7,0.000004047537,0.0048924517,0.94662076,0.000020728263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82941043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5204089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88551635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029579442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026779796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9804208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098136411","doi":"","title":"Compiled by","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Action (physics); Action research; Wish; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.029122383122795196,"score_gpt":0.4265818239567729,"score_spread":0.3974594408339777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098136411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029457686,0.000008417114,0.00023700729,0.23159772,0.000102530445,0.000026972883,3.4836174e-7,0.00004533345,0.7650359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9275653,0.00000755814,0.00049400615,0.011784024,0.00007515361,7.702854e-7,0.0000032073403,5.65807e-7,0.060069453],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975204,0.000030572635,0.00004318958,0.000034833763,0.00007872405,0.000060625043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982834,0.000043290915,0.000015020834,0.00003681208,0.000045622084,0.00003088998],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016700425,0.000014358554,0.000017972798,0.000012701028,0.00020391468,0.000073221716,0.000050450763,0.000016168457,0.0039773006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015335898,0.000013253871,0.000006722453,0.00019487034,0.000021351902,0.000250703,9.883782e-7,0.000053024418,0.00028516442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.7376273e-7,0.000026033445,0.00009140803,3.462308e-8,4.0560192e-7,2.4234836e-8,0.0015812552,3.4524316e-8,0.00008555436,0.47891316,0.51330197,0.005999719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027332339,0.0000047945155,0.00081364816,2.3608355e-7,6.5435415e-7,4.5605795e-8,0.0014420281,0.0000017449248,0.00004668832,0.0035126724,0.994128,0.000022157983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009942623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016180711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9246195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014647569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011450513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099198293","doi":"","title":"Knowledge Management 11-1 11Knowledge Management inthe Public Interest The continuing education imperative","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Public interest; Multidisciplinary approach; Variety (cybernetics); Legal profession; Economic Justice; Legal research; Continuing education","score_opus":0.13325812569397263,"score_gpt":0.4239653193035675,"score_spread":0.29070719360959485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099198293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012458946,0.00015594237,0.0005987662,0.082623646,0.0025229775,0.00064497406,8.1918176e-7,0.00010863037,0.9008853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8521226,0.00006473887,0.00089374545,0.0011307646,0.0004337542,0.00020735983,0.000010575872,0.000009506837,0.14512694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857074,0.00043326485,0.0002637626,0.000225231,0.00023404244,0.00027293435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854857,0.00016569461,0.00011642519,0.00030407743,0.00070216524,0.00016306342],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019465396,0.0001161879,0.00008824867,0.00018769926,0.0004860427,0.00080589316,0.00048179764,0.000048377977,0.0006602456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004181629,0.00008363118,0.000041130083,0.0009222025,0.00020192898,0.0009883054,0.00014582295,0.00020932897,0.0009088419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020886455,0.00020104964,0.00022083736,0.000005289467,0.000023943894,2.5774855e-7,0.051916894,1.00576855e-7,8.7490326e-7,0.7368492,0.119547606,0.09123189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012587785,0.00000788945,0.0003488719,0.000017494,0.000019422823,5.3185266e-7,0.2590289,0.000010426662,0.000009232392,0.0032138354,0.73712695,0.000090574955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036887566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068825944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8396637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034018833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005165716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099313140","doi":"","title":"Into the Boards ….……………………………………………………………….……………………………………….….44","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.07608999555435379,"score_gpt":0.39774842049649334,"score_spread":0.32165842494213953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099313140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01924134,0.006538872,0.0027382553,0.2208562,0.0075743985,0.004244891,0.00005012196,0.0039854506,0.7347705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8154917,0.006321566,0.0075438893,0.019575883,0.0052290596,0.0015492692,0.0001124891,0.0005261741,0.14365001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790016,0.003207385,0.0036146974,0.0031875155,0.005690799,0.005298033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98468035,0.0037143654,0.0015363952,0.005348935,0.0021815668,0.0025383728],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008425069,0.0023219434,0.0017934757,0.0019593395,0.015435649,0.0038744067,0.0068211085,0.0014740248,0.057704393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005955386,0.0019135674,0.0016116989,0.009582348,0.006280999,0.006520306,0.00091181166,0.0052169743,0.012551422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009855162,0.0012164144,0.0019515051,0.00005054973,0.00044427832,0.00010735919,0.06964955,0.00008841552,0.00048087622,0.42309225,0.41382354,0.08899673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019691177,0.00021522287,0.0004957581,0.00008739176,0.0003155661,0.0001353962,0.017668536,0.0012815596,0.00039036313,0.012692189,0.9621777,0.0025712282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012105167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066418117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7962503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017428964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014722786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099762024","doi":"","title":"Introducing `Coffee House&amp;apos;","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thursday; Jazz; White (mutation); Period (music); Ain't; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.1319573410570581,"score_gpt":0.4388735557706789,"score_spread":0.3069162147136208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099762024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036474552,0.000021330932,0.0013763246,0.1314244,0.000708623,0.00007724848,5.3576053e-7,0.00026893255,0.8296481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789878,0.000007468698,0.0062954416,0.0018449088,0.0014767948,0.0000068863337,0.00000455199,0.000008422241,0.11136773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993687,0.00007423069,0.00012125906,0.00010817267,0.00017566624,0.00015191492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995219,0.00014441177,0.00004722306,0.00012343653,0.00012837902,0.00003461418],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051914627,0.00003883028,0.000043022603,0.000060322378,0.00046819256,0.00021504879,0.000098405355,0.000037366222,0.004642559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050564803,0.00003701803,0.000019075529,0.00048470745,0.00006602691,0.0004927995,0.000009089208,0.00012790793,0.0012580339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010757053,0.000048005702,0.0016882892,8.4999607e-7,0.0000022708637,1.3449552e-7,0.0036293282,0.00001247295,0.00021837755,0.6426257,0.34937888,0.00239464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004201433,0.0000020632312,0.0016527529,0.000001063552,0.0000031597829,3.6650198e-7,0.0015268092,0.0000021020514,0.00007838432,0.00505609,0.99157745,0.000057771536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0476742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026033957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84251326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056759833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000322046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100179836","doi":"","title":"An Explanatory Testlet Response Model.............................................................. 2","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Discretion; Accreditation; Public law; Consistency (knowledge bases); Common law","score_opus":0.050180616155381386,"score_gpt":0.40205362753764257,"score_spread":0.3518730113822612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100179836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40354738,0.0014508782,0.06344594,0.038946614,0.0075991065,0.01647668,0.0005742805,0.026208615,0.44175053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85546684,0.0012094891,0.06291945,0.017902222,0.004142507,0.009625496,0.0011190221,0.0024057324,0.04520924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9451555,0.01153687,0.009080787,0.009476534,0.010487862,0.014262437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9554144,0.005258319,0.0037120616,0.012812724,0.00895409,0.013848397],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018331403,0.007146129,0.0056320895,0.008650867,0.013040824,0.011410006,0.01352324,0.0050278045,0.041469987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071052075,0.008030631,0.003167267,0.011448156,0.00816273,0.040584393,0.001362419,0.009363622,0.029624568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036192737,0.009828235,0.013193325,0.00037071385,0.0016486117,0.0006171575,0.025902346,0.022154246,0.065893024,0.5086242,0.2923761,0.055772763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014973727,0.0029155915,0.011486008,0.0005881141,0.0012114589,0.00093447615,0.046357732,0.07919798,0.0056012655,0.06644106,0.74961483,0.02067777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020819644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023542186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45723873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008803012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019160686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99626386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100256717","doi":"","title":"Administrations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Work (physics); Legislation; Public law; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.13039413851431167,"score_gpt":0.49819726126867114,"score_spread":0.36780312275435945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100256717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045475108,0.000010331518,0.00036586978,0.076465406,0.0004368739,0.000030393001,3.131991e-7,0.000043757158,0.9180995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9472679,0.0000036740405,0.0015433418,0.0014452076,0.00039284353,0.0000053873587,0.0000016661861,0.0000010057943,0.049339004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974006,0.000033485765,0.000041941294,0.000019923751,0.00007142893,0.000093168506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997658,0.00007200731,0.000013939782,0.000040104598,0.000043014614,0.000065124776],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030096667,0.000012946977,0.000012267949,0.000017177175,0.0003009441,0.00005189906,0.00003303126,0.000016112563,0.0083377985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036499032,0.000012261494,0.000007310029,0.00019134121,0.000032538388,0.00074222777,0.000002130188,0.000047288366,0.00080930104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.3382656e-7,0.000033388245,0.0041835755,1.0365969e-7,7.865244e-7,6.6772348e-9,0.0063541424,1.48677985e-8,0.000008096277,0.94645995,0.04208375,0.00087603036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009739072,0.000001111673,0.0045953845,1.5235216e-7,0.0000013100234,1.7197172e-7,0.0068275,2.1790996e-7,0.00002601885,0.00059335015,0.9879251,0.000019917325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010218597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000595747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94586664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014991099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029644367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100263608","doi":"","title":"� Developing an Assessment of First-Year Law Students’ Critical Case Reading and Reasoning Ability: Phase 2 Dorothy H.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Discretion; Common law; Accreditation; Reading (process); Public law","score_opus":0.11640078810724523,"score_gpt":0.5309148083977908,"score_spread":0.41451402029054557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100263608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91950643,0.000008630998,0.0030716602,0.01042057,0.00016418834,0.00016965183,0.0000031298937,0.000049116796,0.06660664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.952978,0.000022901302,0.04631859,0.00042494028,0.00007873289,0.00001156338,0.0000026169055,0.0000048646552,0.00015776798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895483,0.00018086836,0.00023010648,0.00017127405,0.00030274357,0.00016018435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988357,0.00058528746,0.000058734146,0.00012782824,0.0002763815,0.000116112686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011912362,0.000060307902,0.00010499298,0.000049793904,0.0011585637,0.00014018106,0.00009470627,0.000050079972,0.00040738875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012421943,0.000059952727,0.000015610874,0.00029315273,0.0003731543,0.0010358122,0.000032514607,0.00015103606,0.0000024617414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041560397,0.0002455378,0.05278137,0.00001108508,0.000008248944,0.00003563824,0.016094318,3.943851e-7,0.000018816265,0.93037057,0.000115827504,0.00031402908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047201407,0.00079273764,0.065857336,0.00026856494,0.00018200863,0.0013063493,0.47370642,0.0011529257,0.000822338,0.022898996,0.42669025,0.0016019321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013611909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005180565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9074716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112805195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045273354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100391509","doi":"","title":"LSAC RESEARCH REPORT SERIES � Assessing the Impact of Topic Interest on Comprehension Processes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Comprehension; Process (computing); Work (physics); Subject (documents); Common law","score_opus":0.6038921834669119,"score_gpt":0.6007961538610703,"score_spread":0.0030960296058415437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100391509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50169003,0.0000141642495,0.000026435688,0.00683987,0.00013695689,0.000100930214,2.2883195e-7,0.000018582108,0.4911728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924311,0.000027104314,0.00031630273,0.00007488892,0.00008929185,0.000007201301,0.0000016603614,0.000003029758,0.0070493934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990954,0.00026372305,0.00016876301,0.000094131254,0.00024705706,0.00013094327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828076,0.00051407516,0.00010393344,0.0001817475,0.0008866565,0.0000328478],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014454168,0.000039393708,0.000057363814,0.00007481413,0.00053865346,0.00014593634,0.00016505616,0.000035822573,0.0022056107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023064308,0.000022649045,0.000023788365,0.000746866,0.00030344317,0.0007650183,0.000025873962,0.00024286332,0.00003044147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006957488,0.0010078034,0.07977682,0.000052031555,0.00006173402,0.00001822017,0.16756359,0.0000029267974,0.0017258646,0.661813,0.075126834,0.012781596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001442453,0.00037814412,0.424397,0.00012942225,0.0000093328645,0.000023244434,0.14022508,0.0000052949126,0.0077378578,0.025659055,0.40109095,0.00020038769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014414586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013844296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63615394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050349896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011761766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100711321","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Corporation; Table of contents; Voting; Table (database)","score_opus":0.055471642455260296,"score_gpt":0.3869331211830664,"score_spread":0.33146147872780607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100711321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02043281,0.00000903071,0.00017450075,0.017816685,0.00015077145,0.000030900865,7.349848e-7,0.000014455606,0.9613701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9003326,0.0000017803862,0.00044661743,0.0002667008,0.00005633931,0.0000013024189,0.0000014697799,6.904884e-7,0.09889245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997709,0.000018646904,0.00006238672,0.000024474462,0.00007821388,0.000045386285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976194,0.00004635443,0.00003165528,0.000031723837,0.00011882136,0.000009521912],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013729521,0.000010655656,0.000020571599,0.000016980368,0.00008236878,0.00001981641,0.000036616133,0.000012820633,0.002345863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013955365,0.000009699,0.000006255696,0.00021934992,0.000039536044,0.00020553812,0.0000022377665,0.00002488551,0.000050067832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.003025e-7,0.000035343815,0.0058450005,4.2093822e-7,8.1860003e-7,2.389885e-8,0.0004693276,6.310245e-7,0.00026759785,0.91528165,0.0778566,0.00024208259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003642997,0.0000018751575,0.0051104855,6.381495e-7,0.0000011118264,3.2066428e-8,0.0019482601,0.0000016072105,0.0005317426,0.003595306,0.9887573,0.000015195273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06665689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043300446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91168636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000064407973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118085234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100787313","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Table (database); Voting; Table of contents; Basic law","score_opus":0.08389215324917623,"score_gpt":0.421101213522614,"score_spread":0.3372090602734378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100787313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013747512,0.0000110615265,0.00012137034,0.07186583,0.00011018863,0.000031000956,5.2776136e-7,0.00001419064,0.9140983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9158399,0.0000074825302,0.0012776135,0.0011339592,0.00008060792,0.0000013334632,5.48273e-7,7.0881316e-7,0.08165785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997721,0.000018612083,0.000060013102,0.000024607718,0.000078259676,0.00004644282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997583,0.000046285404,0.000028696757,0.00003522914,0.00011304871,0.000018445173],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016918287,0.000010677564,0.000020608768,0.000016851007,0.00007866832,0.000017109314,0.000043987613,0.000012902537,0.0056060767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028386226,0.00000968888,0.0000062028216,0.00018461829,0.000034804758,0.00033459355,0.0000027739668,0.000030914063,0.00014222055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010292298,0.000055484914,0.0021237505,5.031239e-7,0.0000025861475,1.3339752e-8,0.0049893707,0.0000013579785,0.00023558021,0.9073199,0.07878645,0.00648399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003460102,0.0000018525185,0.00075155066,5.9898616e-7,9.796086e-7,3.2580566e-8,0.0031809665,0.000004634527,0.0005125589,0.00028028016,0.9952185,0.000013437514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005319926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023047943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009212324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013646002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100835900","doi":"","title":"AUTHOR’S TRANSLATION","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Translation (biology); Information system; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.1781616907116651,"score_gpt":0.47050242685404714,"score_spread":0.29234073614238204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100835900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005188091,0.000009162474,0.0023672602,0.2088655,0.00025357856,0.000041124622,1.2333736e-7,0.00006297635,0.7832122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89372504,0.000013512763,0.0017129289,0.0012238536,0.00017392088,0.0000036696567,0.000002110991,0.0000015641031,0.103143424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996802,0.000046756497,0.000057408044,0.00004242389,0.00010428654,0.00006891296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977905,0.00007288618,0.00001630958,0.000041075058,0.00005753807,0.000033164193],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003290865,0.000016697359,0.000017192331,0.00003155121,0.0002604695,0.000073417425,0.000041018986,0.000025344101,0.0077195438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014514277,0.000016107064,0.000010226758,0.0003632554,0.000027844899,0.0004702229,9.767381e-7,0.000058962938,0.00035733226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020320085,0.000029995463,0.0017380585,2.714746e-7,0.0000018717888,2.6911752e-7,0.01511474,0.0000010698878,0.000045554618,0.8910098,0.03902772,0.053028613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002741286,0.000001901957,0.0012471867,3.8204803e-7,0.0000014517223,3.1423417e-7,0.0034827471,0.000014736628,0.0000141682785,0.001834268,0.9933498,0.000025664458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030817455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002987905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95432204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017254624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017610552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99318755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100927966","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Corporation; Table of contents; Voting; Table (database)","score_opus":0.1502876374256218,"score_gpt":0.3969323015744124,"score_spread":0.2466446641487906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100927966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064172763,0.000019073674,0.000059084166,0.034081433,0.00016838223,0.000029993242,5.242328e-7,0.000013846098,0.9592104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86129856,0.000017554215,0.00028699465,0.00062673725,0.000029760447,0.0000012668794,2.5944007e-7,6.754156e-7,0.1377382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997702,0.000021376778,0.00005573146,0.0000252791,0.00008070923,0.000046689016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997609,0.000052016134,0.000028062612,0.000037745245,0.00010287377,0.000018382245],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011062869,0.000010790881,0.000021278085,0.000017186918,0.00008722328,0.000018317918,0.00004356422,0.00001309401,0.020966996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036058738,0.00000980893,0.0000063870884,0.00023784852,0.000039587947,0.00024345976,0.0000025079253,0.000031240754,0.00020802388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.0775157e-7,0.0000756526,0.0029544688,8.287126e-7,0.000003118967,5.249045e-8,0.007710154,2.3517663e-7,0.00013677296,0.7713239,0.21501583,0.002778574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034682434,0.0000028323861,0.00046365955,7.2123856e-7,0.000001082014,4.5337394e-8,0.0035745003,0.000011610409,0.00014126829,0.00040519665,0.9953496,0.000014794961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00525309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051150384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8548813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000055771366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027226131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97992796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7101048699","doi":"","title":"Development of Performance Standards in Civil Justice: A Discussion Paper","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Economic Justice; Incentive; Performance measurement; Scope (computer science); Plan (archaeology); Work (physics); Perspective (graphical); Dispute resolution","score_opus":0.02546515280779764,"score_gpt":0.37160211986162756,"score_spread":0.3461369670538299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7101048699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20249397,0.000011360271,0.00049647194,0.015232227,0.00022010904,0.00009010091,0.0000015895978,0.00001975238,0.7814344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851797,0.000009749107,0.0042246273,0.0001515198,0.000053814787,0.000007658149,0.0000032565608,0.0000020135644,0.010367621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993023,0.000033439912,0.00019519382,0.000061839535,0.000306235,0.000100978345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997026,0.000036284364,0.00005370695,0.000050283677,0.00013878266,0.000018355317],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083593774,0.00003161449,0.000045993216,0.000060247636,0.00020891103,0.000028394572,0.000061151855,0.000029310944,0.0019397857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016223794,0.000020897545,0.000007845109,0.00042835943,0.000044272296,0.00047509003,0.00000954082,0.00007663752,0.000013898293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041865555,0.00065744115,0.029681956,0.00009600915,0.0000073150973,6.368158e-7,0.12285443,0.00006626144,0.0019921237,0.70443827,0.036011655,0.10415204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093579154,0.0000032777155,0.028535767,0.000014358856,0.0000025658142,5.6936646e-8,0.009865313,0.000011340945,0.00029239818,0.00022737538,0.9609072,0.000046768553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011043857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02886578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9248955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012461464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015128155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102522511","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0055","title":"Seventy-five years of legal education and scholarship at the ‘modern’ Faculty of Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal education; Legal profession; Legal research; Higher education; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.023926528288515745,"score_gpt":0.3374437462230814,"score_spread":0.3135172179345656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102522511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4229615,0.0005061827,0.000059825725,0.011541953,0.0003629157,0.00009277421,0.00001677108,0.000004225147,0.56445384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98651206,0.00011168005,0.00046564842,0.00015440091,0.000027694754,4.013025e-8,0.0000022596046,0.0000010918861,0.012725126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994654,0.0001473694,0.00010245039,0.00005193168,0.00017156271,0.00006126651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992211,0.00009856818,0.00021162491,0.000071411414,0.00036070668,0.000036622052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005020541,0.00002972467,0.00007180517,0.000018238869,0.000563775,0.000027015309,0.00016921759,0.000040393767,0.00040914578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010833001,0.000029865563,0.000039624025,0.000058675672,0.00035531545,0.0008837176,0.000038038062,0.000143513,9.19086e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039215036,0.00011547957,0.0012508285,0.00000885338,0.000047105717,3.1752927e-7,0.032061726,0.0000045042425,0.00021465916,0.95369816,0.0031707059,0.0093884375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002612927,0.000022920922,0.026477706,0.00005017376,0.000060252845,0.000003113438,0.039129686,0.0000027941082,0.00015656585,0.0057726055,0.92801654,0.0000463557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22591858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24082287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94792557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020054482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006375084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7792361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102692710","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0040","title":"Multidisciplinary Marty Friedland, miscarriages of justice, and the modern law school","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Multidisciplinary approach; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Social injustice; Focus (optics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.014064567837728262,"score_gpt":0.30338030359581064,"score_spread":0.2893157357580824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102692710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062619704,0.00052146334,0.0004396758,0.014747406,0.0002195077,0.000078266625,0.0000043680557,0.000006313113,0.97772104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758871,0.0003640587,0.0010868312,0.00012976391,0.000053973334,5.27455e-8,4.3952224e-7,0.0000018699438,0.022475904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949604,0.00016736006,0.00008982824,0.000052611285,0.00012371523,0.00007044798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993723,0.00019409877,0.00013887387,0.00007411774,0.0001662769,0.00005433233],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005112814,0.00003503282,0.0000853735,0.000015259928,0.0010640279,0.00003845275,0.00016460333,0.00003922038,0.0013752631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118422286,0.000029057706,0.000038025657,0.000045508787,0.00060565904,0.0005112294,0.00004351409,0.00014436644,0.0000019864253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120467084,0.000042476207,0.0005392402,0.000012542431,0.00004724074,0.0000011539177,0.016760807,0.0000076963515,0.00003862625,0.97595876,0.00575812,0.0007128521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024976416,0.000029397974,0.0064339642,0.00007773563,0.00037707872,0.000004511614,0.15128954,0.0001792402,0.000026890855,0.028190456,0.8107873,0.000106217274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14396837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23580097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022275902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102812399","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0051","title":"Professor Alan Mewett on morality and the criminal law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Morality; Public morality; Foundation (evidence); Public law; Criminal procedure; Focus (optics); Comparative law","score_opus":0.02755648655297038,"score_gpt":0.33728179897787536,"score_spread":0.309725312424905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102812399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014379537,0.00010516522,0.00008273348,0.1265223,0.0003572808,0.00008714883,0.0000024410826,0.000008012516,0.85845536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906154,0.000101770886,0.0002512026,0.0014681024,0.00006508404,6.336883e-8,4.7229267e-7,9.1016767e-7,0.00749697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933016,0.00030615568,0.0000729953,0.000055222114,0.0001528207,0.000082624385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940944,0.00019291186,0.00010355529,0.00007163681,0.00017934163,0.000043146356],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008444554,0.00003439982,0.00007120571,0.000010424519,0.0017743978,0.000073198506,0.00017084541,0.000036126956,0.00066571287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009830583,0.000028142133,0.000033993154,0.000041660383,0.0006228801,0.0005498689,0.000023383813,0.00021888052,0.000002169332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011391191,0.000038210797,0.000099224504,0.0000033033054,0.000022206103,0.0000010211446,0.018458826,6.066917e-7,0.0000024098802,0.97485185,0.0055735963,0.0008348299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068014616,0.000019535142,0.0021600157,0.000021622081,0.00006035879,0.0000016033414,0.08016949,0.000004310266,0.000011823553,0.008010385,0.90882,0.00004074656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27942252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35164815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97623587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014089716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022911179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103478134","doi":"","title":"3.3 Lloyd Gaines","year":2015,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Blue Tiger Commons (Lincoln University - Missouri)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Statute; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); State law","score_opus":0.09540813892857358,"score_gpt":0.328374988518429,"score_spread":0.23296684958985542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103478134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16764303,0.0005768981,0.00058119296,0.15928945,0.0037912517,0.0008600215,0.00010917726,0.00035029167,0.6667987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79071504,0.0001564617,0.00084902707,0.0010240086,0.0009784641,0.0000019528943,0.000047831007,0.000035599845,0.20619163],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569684,0.0013598563,0.00050472084,0.000642519,0.0009590561,0.0008370185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951048,0.0007837692,0.0005740324,0.0008268628,0.0014851185,0.0012254036],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018990283,0.0004153828,0.00047933112,0.0005801052,0.002498968,0.00052510545,0.0013317171,0.00048765037,0.0034097678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014105698,0.0005253713,0.00026435032,0.0034306536,0.0009730661,0.001973877,0.00037078222,0.0011872229,0.003308951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036384747,0.0021405416,0.0071376376,0.00004391511,0.0003327737,0.00019666797,0.18523897,0.00029820803,0.00004668468,0.13643098,0.6636465,0.0041232286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001142809,0.000104708895,0.00067197904,0.00004894432,0.0002036305,0.000008135043,0.10029322,0.0002162679,0.000035000136,0.0008700451,0.89584094,0.00056430354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015689047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008415843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.623072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011348461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055237287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106505471","doi":"10.1007/978-981-96-9748-9_7","title":"The Pedagogical Value of the Canadian National Negotiation Competition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Winnipeg; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick; University of Saskatchewan; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Nature versus nurture; Adversarial system; Competition (biology); Value (mathematics); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.10878554543939115,"score_gpt":0.4049599625734195,"score_spread":0.29617441713402837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106505471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000031211903,0.000025748413,0.000022458627,0.16792226,0.00088591146,0.000188467,0.00002401837,0.0000101173,0.8309179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050373446,0.00005703254,0.000055379016,0.0027464281,0.00030648042,0.0000069152743,0.00003574218,0.0000039010233,0.94641465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892235,0.00009203843,0.00021252141,0.000096040465,0.0005760182,0.00010105389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982152,0.00058492547,0.00019364296,0.00012638392,0.0008332487,0.000046584482],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078326516,0.00006727123,0.00006396548,0.00008087913,0.0018226927,0.00016459459,0.00027194215,0.00017964277,0.002247632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010603021,0.000042390217,0.000068754096,0.00012735615,0.00028584665,0.00012546063,0.000018052793,0.0003741627,0.000057300178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.773035e-7,0.0000035960893,0.000017549994,0.0000016609027,0.000011113746,2.3358307e-8,0.0009514969,0.000003325578,2.1795069e-7,0.94940543,0.048942823,0.0006619753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020861307,0.0000020024938,0.00041785344,0.0000148958825,0.00001151147,1.5235923e-7,0.00047803196,0.000010977536,9.306272e-7,0.1365089,0.8624907,0.000043177795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23933654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8863607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8135479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004775578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011033413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106552819","doi":"10.1007/978-981-96-9748-9_1","title":"Introduction: Transforming Legal Practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Legal profession; Legal practice; Economic Justice; Legal research; Legal realism; Practice of law; Dispute resolution; Empirical legal studies","score_opus":0.028863924610762745,"score_gpt":0.3678233956378466,"score_spread":0.33895947102708385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106552819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[4.8323095e-8,0.000079028585,0.00032934672,0.3842744,0.0019931018,0.00016167831,0.0000034810444,0.0000881025,0.61307085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00008371629,0.00048193106,0.0018862456,0.0054514064,0.005101314,0.000010602195,0.000033641114,0.000012506347,0.98693866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988387,0.000053551234,0.00028898846,0.00026272185,0.00039132714,0.00016466326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843216,0.00046335653,0.00017420188,0.00021777568,0.0006443667,0.00006816883],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008516726,0.00013766615,0.00014387736,0.00018897737,0.00068990013,0.0003547474,0.00017855779,0.00027510218,0.024880981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014716062,0.00014593008,0.000079204416,0.0001562932,0.00014799333,0.001732469,0.000013091691,0.0008340881,0.00072009355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050899675,0.0000106994075,5.6971217e-8,0.0000048967167,0.00002683728,0.0000011782107,0.0010696115,1.6604866e-7,4.754341e-7,0.6150655,0.37001088,0.013804601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047606663,0.00000866722,1.5501666e-7,0.000015833839,0.0000859346,0.0000046625464,0.0021725013,3.9289984e-7,0.0000045416296,0.008073859,0.9894266,0.00015924923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002586896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014927792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6194157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002149801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030715547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9760104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106582863","doi":"10.1007/978-981-96-9748-9_10","title":"Access to Justice and Dispute Resolution Skills","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Order (exchange); Procedural justice","score_opus":0.05683772467511326,"score_gpt":0.4248422213189658,"score_spread":0.36800449664385254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106582863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000035470118,0.00005671113,0.00095300033,0.09877763,0.0010121098,0.00025482828,0.000013850973,0.00005495978,0.8988734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00053600786,0.00037517128,0.0009864201,0.009279429,0.00044480315,0.000010469183,0.000017737531,0.000006898308,0.98834306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992563,0.000028495639,0.00016606224,0.00021034149,0.00021316951,0.00012564052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990588,0.00034492268,0.000087069355,0.00014753686,0.0002604048,0.00010129018],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035104508,0.00009480923,0.00010271162,0.00018099371,0.0005123962,0.0004873607,0.00020005192,0.00017410511,0.0021702508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000848381,0.00009548724,0.000023596767,0.00014099266,0.00008203295,0.00055322924,0.00008975747,0.00026990002,0.00018006464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018113128,0.0000065870995,0.0000043103823,0.000012239864,0.000007444542,2.8405637e-7,0.0009815311,3.9310513e-7,2.2508529e-7,0.72115684,0.2687516,0.009076719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029299272,0.0000054605025,0.00015375616,0.000047622347,0.00008624674,2.0464775e-7,0.0002372363,0.0000019117954,7.532595e-7,0.015095143,0.9842259,0.00011643515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020482328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047367094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7154743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010053693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007876486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111476603","doi":"","title":"School of Law named nation’s best value for fifth time in seven years","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Investment (military); Quarter (Canadian coin); Value (mathematics); Ranking (information retrieval); Legal education","score_opus":0.034019356938253975,"score_gpt":0.3467805358915319,"score_spread":0.31276117895327793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111476603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15711473,0.00527781,0.00023025363,0.12326331,0.011843623,0.00451556,0.00090356736,0.0003461275,0.696505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9463108,0.00016102957,0.0018656575,0.0027656718,0.0013049153,0.00021017708,0.00008343498,0.00005510021,0.047243193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671125,0.00043690886,0.0009572817,0.0005940946,0.0007419477,0.00055849605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972297,0.0012385014,0.00029194597,0.00040741888,0.00049557636,0.00033683455],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024803276,0.00025919915,0.00038854554,0.0002945625,0.00048320196,0.0009087293,0.000551714,0.00036415053,0.007547303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023146705,0.00030123434,0.00021123496,0.0019805524,0.00044628352,0.0025776164,0.00007517358,0.0009927002,0.0045918943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043343494,0.0003807732,0.00017194776,0.00016662633,0.000105695915,0.0000059188037,0.012926125,0.000105921274,0.00039044596,0.96448326,0.019805577,0.0014143916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054012134,0.00011677662,0.0003993209,0.00037542346,0.0000918596,0.0000023455798,0.0026044108,0.0006779464,0.00017688751,0.023979446,0.97067887,0.00035660714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032785594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011664469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95087326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006098438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034991226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111573936","doi":"","title":"Curricular Choices: Misconceptions Regarding Law School Courses","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Legal education; Higher education; Competence (human resources)","score_opus":0.029314860765962996,"score_gpt":0.3524613979428314,"score_spread":0.32314653717686836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111573936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009315494,0.0043793283,0.0006335145,0.09270684,0.009611062,0.0012215225,0.00009316011,0.0003599874,0.8816791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87360114,0.0009824776,0.0012837149,0.024777759,0.0026627185,0.00023534645,0.0000668733,0.000048522157,0.09634142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942988,0.00108725,0.0012643525,0.0011053296,0.0010820931,0.0011621509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99497294,0.0009792519,0.0006837715,0.0011656864,0.0013208647,0.0008774746],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020967226,0.0005682166,0.0006337172,0.00030706578,0.0058193854,0.003367644,0.0012693534,0.0005895417,0.01823638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037568796,0.000618644,0.0004253124,0.0038738458,0.0016115142,0.005093273,0.00022000345,0.0023863483,0.0046670977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019469562,0.0004296146,0.002941004,0.00006767539,0.00021817716,0.0000064638502,0.0013851927,0.00005158806,0.0001891571,0.89782083,0.096288785,0.00058204227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008518729,0.00004516414,0.00055275625,0.0005765373,0.00034385722,0.0000037491322,0.012915177,0.000051564384,0.00024361096,0.01494878,0.9688105,0.0006564295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04272761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028573541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88287205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000858722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043506427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113706274","doi":"","title":"100% of first-gen college graduates receive aid","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal education; Higher education; Value (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Class (philosophy)","score_opus":0.037292281919520706,"score_gpt":0.33383710934975047,"score_spread":0.29654482743022975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113706274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05940428,0.008573695,0.00005104687,0.21807209,0.0130686555,0.0011724884,0.0006139198,0.00029988907,0.69874394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9358101,0.0016021479,0.0009198477,0.0015554413,0.0014936113,0.0000690893,0.000037246155,0.00004600816,0.058466524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964482,0.00048522232,0.00095066923,0.0006472431,0.00086311315,0.0006055279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660325,0.0014312497,0.00034339097,0.00053447933,0.00068178313,0.00040586083],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017738163,0.00032282283,0.00041631592,0.00024449197,0.0012798666,0.0008189635,0.00065614487,0.0003330492,0.019620813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019067952,0.00033383313,0.00025874499,0.0035622278,0.0008111285,0.0024781127,0.000103547296,0.0011404316,0.0031156873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033656204,0.00026901596,0.0007301677,0.00020662103,0.00019028242,0.000014634827,0.013214108,0.000012142215,0.000121808065,0.78050035,0.20332578,0.0013814442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002559328,0.00012231589,0.00029947338,0.00033680318,0.00014860074,0.000005695532,0.016258243,0.00014005128,0.00067921204,0.022071717,0.95930624,0.0003757192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02508787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0150804175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87640584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034496837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025369877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114832071","doi":"","title":"Don’t Just Change the Rules, Change the Game: The Rules Overhaul and Ontario’s Legal Ecosystem","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Ecosystem; Legislation; Liability; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.07878989805586858,"score_gpt":0.32839659768175067,"score_spread":0.24960669962588208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114832071","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3280423,0.0050281375,0.0000023961215,0.56944215,0.008352858,0.0030460241,0.00038010874,0.00022248505,0.085483536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391412,0.002047933,0.000016681703,0.02429721,0.0063468115,0.0010579966,0.00006979932,0.00005421114,0.026968125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949548,0.0012935216,0.000748629,0.00070843636,0.0012162902,0.0010783154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959396,0.0015589498,0.00063446735,0.0011949242,0.00036240002,0.0003096307],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050468943,0.00048192864,0.00039530545,0.000115042996,0.006162078,0.0036289801,0.001584868,0.0003313866,0.0042738207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006458037,0.000272912,0.00021953508,0.0018371551,0.0010298035,0.0029775663,0.0004579105,0.0021903473,0.0034674422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004065122,0.00014094921,0.0027315125,0.00006911015,0.00017961468,0.000014254524,0.15631062,0.0000019070723,0.000007514022,0.7472813,0.08271948,0.010503084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003132962,0.000053372158,0.043533333,0.000100967365,0.00016118267,0.000019563495,0.042704806,0.00008433492,0.000005617701,0.001976031,0.91068673,0.00036074585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51180375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8219009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8279673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053250254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012484115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114893992","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5824082","title":"From Data to Understanding: Access to Knowledge as&amp;nbsp;a Requirement&amp;nbsp;for Access to Justice in New Brunswick","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.4368885060801102,"score_gpt":0.5427931261012434,"score_spread":0.10590462002113321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114893992","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013762284,0.0013223035,0.3388427,0.58035225,0.012095226,0.0038825797,0.00027093955,0.00015326333,0.049318455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54215944,0.010460731,0.023939133,0.05365511,0.033124767,0.00048512878,0.0025755751,0.00034706382,0.3332531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937298,0.0005369205,0.0010641599,0.0011609154,0.0008168266,0.0026913697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957093,0.0010712773,0.000578668,0.0012854136,0.00058695074,0.0007684004],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068607917,0.00044026846,0.0005595619,0.0012008649,0.0011492681,0.0039415327,0.0062417015,0.0004156036,0.0006750388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008691104,0.000489477,0.0001317225,0.0027801055,0.000057099518,0.0024190198,0.002445656,0.004861697,0.0003356622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041858442,0.0003810601,0.0009370328,0.000084797226,0.0003867483,0.0000012691306,0.033923283,0.0005956073,0.000034434423,0.5915196,0.3598996,0.011817999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043788084,0.000056317564,0.000299287,0.0003322493,0.00022551566,0.0000027173955,0.011933102,0.000011291606,0.000006372268,0.24503635,0.7411707,0.00048823378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12012337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8231698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7030465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010027148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14689746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115379435","doi":"","title":"Comparative Family Law by FL-EUR:First Results and Working Methods on Vulnerable Adults","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"VU Research Portal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.2716903778007749,"score_gpt":0.5378039896915112,"score_spread":0.26611361189073635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115379435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005916594,0.0006855871,0.000020819187,0.014016213,0.0005855482,0.00063007465,0.00015083466,0.00005905595,0.9837927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039242167,0.0013817371,0.0016207848,0.000947531,0.00057365076,0.00006900081,0.0002711221,0.000026049109,0.95586795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633396,0.00090023957,0.00047189734,0.0006240657,0.0011505667,0.0005192446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939745,0.0043894635,0.00023416673,0.00037829517,0.000784189,0.00023939763],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006907882,0.00022635979,0.00035000505,0.000389888,0.0025578486,0.00059866835,0.00038224497,0.00037878167,0.00073373166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022313236,0.00022415761,0.00006609019,0.00043246787,0.0009299717,0.00034986428,0.00012253533,0.002912565,0.00014300771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097903314,0.000036847767,0.000002458516,0.000012845235,0.000041221425,0.000008123754,0.005219047,4.73835e-7,0.0000057059165,0.63223886,0.35891303,0.0034234684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029068463,0.00008995147,0.00001572457,0.0003503662,0.000012476836,6.429125e-7,0.0045248508,0.00001303377,0.000032768457,0.008433397,0.9860241,0.00021200393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012300804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011000869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6271111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015046568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014582657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117124360","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70035","title":"New footprints on an old trail","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Field (mathematics); Family law; Publishing; Mental health; Learning disability","score_opus":0.08069392064567658,"score_gpt":0.44890399487255994,"score_spread":0.36821007422688334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117124360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006494237,0.011682776,0.00023257654,0.24940453,0.0010910776,0.00039116514,0.0000018475873,0.000080424375,0.73646617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.092290014,0.18114641,0.0039741616,0.35749233,0.0012795434,0.00013193916,0.00003714848,0.00002730423,0.36362115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990416,0.0002265324,0.00020471848,0.00016076757,0.00022263912,0.00014373046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927884,0.00016004032,0.00007277237,0.0002529712,0.00013566512,0.00009972997],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009902341,0.00006993342,0.00013700782,0.000056911824,0.00026972344,0.00010530755,0.0002484917,0.000051423733,0.0011498318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094414747,0.000064704334,0.000048093163,0.0007797142,0.000033004224,0.00028126486,0.000010942522,0.00023900715,0.0005273648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012866975,0.00004512419,0.00008968783,0.00006075668,0.000006705871,3.1690394e-7,0.00060599094,1.6486057e-7,0.0000070547185,0.32032055,0.43719575,0.24166663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057298563,0.0000127557205,0.005155923,0.00069384393,0.000024921606,1.0595184e-7,0.00040565865,5.7140903e-7,0.000002524216,0.0016974577,0.99188125,0.000067661706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032916823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005234074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55468553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079141224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013960523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119515939","doi":"10.1093/jpo/joaf013","title":"Deference to authority: how seniority influences how attorneys view professional obligations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Professions and Organization","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Seniority; Deference; Professional conduct; Professional responsibility; Legal ethics; Transactional leadership; Legal profession; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.0348290785316277,"score_gpt":0.3972478834253698,"score_spread":0.3624188048937421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119515939","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4793949,0.00015116246,0.009082395,0.5072938,0.0024930977,0.00032634826,0.0000048363218,0.00003314881,0.0012202938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98714495,0.00017699446,0.0027771886,0.001441385,0.0002782483,0.000005852075,0.0000056109097,0.0000059830973,0.008163801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985906,0.0005047645,0.0002766468,0.00012613733,0.00034970551,0.00015213144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698085,0.0002984524,0.00035480753,0.00010204052,0.0021040684,0.00015976715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013467373,0.00008812477,0.00015586722,0.00031179553,0.0015019423,0.00039026327,0.00019395098,0.00013046141,0.00014660903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005352823,0.00007077531,0.000025165553,0.0025539687,0.00009311543,0.001373592,0.00005762203,0.00043220085,0.0000064108763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017961574,0.0003424221,0.31110907,0.00009192767,0.00007262005,0.0000026506746,0.054057997,0.000007133886,0.0038241802,0.5147796,0.09472478,0.02096967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003635999,0.00006055916,0.4580874,0.0006281232,0.00010170774,0.00000667156,0.072697684,0.000013401402,0.0006334148,0.008648128,0.45853376,0.00022555508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006123095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017332789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50775003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010487857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023405838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126283232","doi":"","title":"Osborough and Legal Education and Scholarship for Irish University Law Schools: Marking the Dawn of a New Era","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Scholarship; Legal education; Legal research; Legal profession; Higher education","score_opus":0.10430094028553875,"score_gpt":0.4021104475168937,"score_spread":0.2978095072313549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126283232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8843675,0.00029346015,0.00008281674,0.060309168,0.0002660056,0.00042647086,0.00003286036,0.00002297663,0.05419873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8985648,0.000109809735,0.0015659893,0.00011529648,0.00019917931,8.414512e-7,0.00000790807,0.000005303909,0.099430844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979543,0.00096794,0.00010762041,0.00027711634,0.00044776834,0.00024522786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712706,0.0007638524,0.00010271764,0.00023427898,0.0015590959,0.00021298503],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017297632,0.000069210015,0.000110371766,0.00019643182,0.0034957035,0.00031073674,0.00029167507,0.000116079376,0.000036432346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001108973,0.000078833815,0.000044568293,0.001532503,0.0004627842,0.0023938406,0.00014212399,0.0006318122,0.000002279901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098479766,0.00010493403,0.00030386497,0.000026514288,0.00003297403,0.000017918004,0.0028355247,2.9382352e-7,0.00073448796,0.9713884,0.023222018,0.0012346044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043575536,0.000036894457,0.005000799,0.00004716205,0.000028316466,0.000014818462,0.11261201,0.00012856012,0.00020451237,0.000969303,0.8804308,0.00009102513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013749106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005357978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030333392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008363858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128200143","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v14i1.171","title":"Comparing the Reports of the Ontario Law Reform Commission and the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law reform; Advisory committee; Reform Act; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.10397769389845003,"score_gpt":0.3675786213985325,"score_spread":0.26360092750008246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128200143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014255879,0.0029694557,0.0000035478877,0.29741547,0.0013566818,0.0006148721,0.00000183079,0.000011361822,0.6833709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96965164,0.0020030043,0.00002121815,0.018436454,0.00024959052,0.000027923352,0.0000031569252,0.0000054689053,0.009601537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988375,0.00042351853,0.00029738105,0.00010478815,0.00019353237,0.00014328075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879616,0.0001291443,0.00032797045,0.00040888364,0.00022154562,0.00011628094],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019222854,0.0000664165,0.00014248672,0.000021852718,0.0018365673,0.000097049146,0.00022158916,0.000041784515,0.0005930366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037651372,0.000033098833,0.000055706576,0.00034692654,0.0008042111,0.00022929888,0.000025368929,0.000332822,0.000012044285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000736111,0.000018022198,0.0101350695,0.000116776864,0.000040353436,7.7762877e-7,0.013592491,9.547584e-7,0.000012225361,0.75723505,0.21214816,0.006692754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005693721,0.0000031152351,0.011390969,0.00019740663,0.000038982376,0.0000097393595,0.0007240492,0.0000052681467,0.000007345027,0.00035220277,0.9871679,0.000046070494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9538827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99591607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95539576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006187491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014396703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132928919","doi":"","title":"The Bounds of Legality for Family Lawyers: Is the Law Enough?","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Positivism; Principle of legality; Family law; Context (archaeology); Legal positivism; Discretion; Judgement; Legal ethics","score_opus":0.09179031210820125,"score_gpt":0.47712671582119226,"score_spread":0.385336403712991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132928919","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005814612,0.0014206745,0.00012573149,0.5255006,0.0040765963,0.0015057719,0.000052925196,0.000035016947,0.4614681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86955374,0.0009369892,0.0002799196,0.0116413245,0.0010771228,0.00028478977,0.00018384267,0.000042197542,0.11600009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971665,0.00052568363,0.0006835503,0.0004085576,0.0007932428,0.00042244443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99369824,0.0030663789,0.0012158551,0.00056520745,0.0013408323,0.00011345713],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022378333,0.000279085,0.00032910315,0.000033560544,0.0047006337,0.0010791003,0.0010236894,0.00031293868,0.0003930814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021248453,0.00018803075,0.00031694584,0.0013002601,0.00095293426,0.00055068184,0.000036718648,0.00088343146,0.00009131578],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009487306,0.000064107975,0.0000052089613,0.000062732164,0.00011803356,6.9358165e-8,0.33978465,7.9316e-7,0.0002225102,0.61038685,0.048182677,0.0010774912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011321481,0.000053480402,0.00012191867,0.000023464061,0.00014916799,1.10952314e-7,0.37011924,0.00003124727,0.00046762434,0.003070199,0.62571216,0.000138186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04013192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0110144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86373913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094797724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032602835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132937678","doi":"","title":"Legal scholarship: an analysis of law professors&apos; research activities in Ontario&apos;s English-speaking common law schools","year":2002,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Legal research; Higher education; Empirical legal studies; Government (linguistics); Politics; Position (finance); Legal education","score_opus":0.26714671422285746,"score_gpt":0.5470561434967584,"score_spread":0.2799094292739009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132937678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64105165,0.00013897815,0.0000012010012,0.0018742152,0.0010383169,0.0008376075,0.000016874681,0.000049699825,0.35499147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95201844,0.00009401706,0.00023392968,0.0002914444,0.0003536134,0.0001844336,0.0008098605,0.00006761286,0.045946643],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875289,0.0054261778,0.0015676912,0.0011831678,0.0029834805,0.0013105714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99155074,0.0020001251,0.001498372,0.0012202798,0.0033210681,0.00040938935],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009551033,0.0006184678,0.0013803227,0.0027126507,0.002900247,0.0024975808,0.0014912041,0.0012208231,0.0062719393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020327843,0.0007278693,0.0004047735,0.009469361,0.0009619542,0.008499178,0.00012968616,0.009803591,0.000068263296],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021281425,0.0011159244,0.0114131225,0.00008064142,0.0005197288,0.000007747632,0.61623466,0.00014189282,0.00032516808,0.36953226,0.000067172616,0.0003488525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005831895,0.00026443016,0.02504431,0.00055767223,0.0010119107,6.8867826e-7,0.7780036,0.00018385929,0.0011732563,0.0008848255,0.19138329,0.0009089717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96126574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36864743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022769065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004766291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132940483","doi":"","title":"Roles and the Filtering of Reasons","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Scope (computer science); Filter (signal processing); Moral disengagement; Moral character; Normative ethics; Moral rights; Moral authority","score_opus":0.03387853908674058,"score_gpt":0.44451519299633874,"score_spread":0.41063665390959814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132940483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25721917,0.0027051726,0.000023227532,0.12865108,0.0019555283,0.00076111295,0.00001174307,0.00003113855,0.6086418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8711701,0.0014719461,0.00012303912,0.00023350959,0.00015607265,0.00008513175,0.00006315966,0.000014358218,0.12668268],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829847,0.00057803903,0.00029860632,0.000208561,0.00044905624,0.00016724174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997688,0.0011673734,0.0006473937,0.00023212534,0.00021322015,0.00005188111],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015589927,0.00013488303,0.00023037645,0.00009599608,0.0013799663,0.00018189127,0.0002888016,0.00010065203,0.00663777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017233732,0.000112263646,0.00007726888,0.0008265722,0.00041885622,0.00024188902,0.000055186043,0.0006605371,0.000011601203],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001399942,0.000055169105,0.00011117098,0.000051946172,0.000060603878,3.1316557e-7,0.70173377,0.000009454542,0.00015225551,0.29058015,0.0038149944,0.0032901673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025833372,0.000017230925,0.000780307,0.00003219115,0.000094482515,0.0000010767371,0.5516712,0.000036315734,0.00007572368,0.0008975628,0.44602624,0.0001093665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020486664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031633251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6139509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040944797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009393553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132965282","doi":"","title":"Lessons from Bear-Walker (Mukwo-bimossae) and Water Lilies on Decolonization and Indigenization of Canadian Legal Education: An Analysis of the University of Ottawa’s Certificate in Indigenous Law","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenization; Indigenous; Decolonization; Colonialism; Traditional knowledge; Indigenous rights; Legal education; Certificate; Legal history","score_opus":0.03773667902174665,"score_gpt":0.35897071301911104,"score_spread":0.3212340339973644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132965282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98082733,0.00028267005,0.0000058109877,0.010285699,0.0005381196,0.0005039942,0.000120889104,0.0000070844058,0.0074283807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939214,0.000433584,0.00006725858,0.0001019162,0.000036385532,0.000003807325,0.0011403217,0.000017128146,0.004278208],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805176,0.00042886712,0.0005014396,0.00042927134,0.0003577342,0.00023092987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809915,0.00018126603,0.00057073246,0.0003336839,0.00067565887,0.00013953939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000581047,0.00020291732,0.00040216636,0.0014696028,0.00067853136,0.00014340787,0.0002782197,0.0003662768,0.0004631189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015412777,0.0001860466,0.00007912707,0.004348255,0.00044865932,0.00053947704,0.000027409458,0.00039187344,0.0000045926404],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051802384,0.0003343135,0.04580087,0.00012749842,0.00042583112,8.016356e-7,0.8866791,0.000618387,0.0009696947,0.063148476,0.00009755384,0.0017456815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019197237,0.000085464984,0.5708056,0.00021476137,0.0019675256,4.004349e-7,0.39232698,0.0003880911,0.0050101797,0.0005293037,0.028144434,0.0003352994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92965865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98291975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52500474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024595886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039330437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75867605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132979630","doi":"","title":"Towards a More Responsive Legal Ethics","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Information ethics; Harm; Applied ethics; Meta-ethics; Legal profession; Legal research; Ethics of technology","score_opus":0.10157637268423882,"score_gpt":0.5316061451314007,"score_spread":0.4300297724471619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132979630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06788657,0.0009660319,0.000080252896,0.4337151,0.008893078,0.00057265774,0.00001943379,0.00009927188,0.4877676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19152386,0.0018890002,0.0015871831,0.009531386,0.0018079637,0.00012232308,0.0010894943,0.00007930896,0.7923695],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414665,0.0019098327,0.00068799854,0.0008147933,0.0017907745,0.000649936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99174327,0.0019590647,0.0009150688,0.0006421032,0.004402415,0.0003381041],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00290183,0.00046936588,0.0005193017,0.00034902667,0.002506244,0.0015248384,0.00061178417,0.0015965194,0.012845506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025347803,0.00054873904,0.00028936865,0.0035004446,0.0004333545,0.0010591387,0.000067290865,0.005774277,0.00064649316],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014895062,0.00022461763,0.000015249693,0.00012433018,0.0001304314,0.000041265226,0.80440915,0.000007121954,0.0004534948,0.16559744,0.025820771,0.0030271641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012402673,0.000029894276,0.000539797,0.00014397544,0.00011321098,0.000004607692,0.47296995,0.000014537674,0.00042453004,0.00023867197,0.5250541,0.000342726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060687806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016432313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4992333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003991887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041266892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133014402","doi":"","title":"Justice for All: Ontario&apos;s Civil Access to Justice System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Legal profession; Civil law (Civil law); Legal action; Civil procedure; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.24800723953165102,"score_gpt":0.5329575458339828,"score_spread":0.28495030630233176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133014402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009253816,0.000076648736,0.00062603,0.010635053,0.012473827,0.0016047369,0.000018882816,0.00022294572,0.96508807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.106064394,0.000037031572,0.0025199226,0.0032557128,0.0019288814,0.00077622343,0.00064324227,0.000078772224,0.8846958],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982358,0.0001321992,0.00034178747,0.00041506134,0.00044341816,0.00043170943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741644,0.00051333156,0.00043543676,0.00033678746,0.0010450892,0.00025292946],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085928076,0.00023262146,0.0002696138,0.00022770277,0.000964613,0.0006857557,0.0007337163,0.00036084696,0.0017562761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016768757,0.0002563376,0.00009387278,0.0006004016,0.000030015182,0.00073026016,0.000026815773,0.0005169082,0.0004615369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017296275,0.000108833774,0.000023308288,0.0010855068,0.00008460073,0.0000021541077,0.49181154,0.0000056396466,0.000035603385,0.21404247,0.291649,0.0009783485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011556307,0.000029799676,0.0004244653,0.00012764244,0.001083948,6.4952656e-7,0.18744455,0.0000028103582,0.000050573442,0.0001695856,0.8102647,0.00028567621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37021887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8676746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5186157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006746867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004044269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133041788","doi":"","title":"THIS TEACHER&apos;S EXPERIENCE WITH RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AND RESTORATIVE PRACTICE : a narrative","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Narrative; Work (physics); Economic Justice","score_opus":0.06961409668821011,"score_gpt":0.5044956552061468,"score_spread":0.4348815585179367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133041788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123162895,0.0003877431,0.000031910837,0.04247051,0.0015852982,0.00085916993,0.0000062151216,0.00013709474,0.83135915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3555609,0.00036977808,0.0071424977,0.001396265,0.0010744197,0.00046318266,0.00021498493,0.00007332952,0.63370466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972608,0.00080565986,0.0002857808,0.0005558902,0.0007524476,0.00033941466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954706,0.0012220172,0.0008899841,0.0003446141,0.0018559004,0.00021690353],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096945884,0.00032193377,0.00029201095,0.00018551863,0.0020181364,0.00058201695,0.00028546472,0.00050138513,0.0019015656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010005902,0.00029205973,0.000032023516,0.0010192683,0.000555016,0.0022716734,0.000020078995,0.0022402941,0.00010075876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033912854,0.00011934008,0.000017770239,0.000029871868,0.000048499678,0.00000990861,0.947971,3.0139307e-7,0.00024570763,0.033556845,0.016908765,0.000752846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012500872,0.000086472406,0.00016012852,0.000048789454,0.00015182624,0.0000039131146,0.573696,0.0000024081946,0.0000781918,0.00008375926,0.4253196,0.00024385889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020154072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05052482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40841085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023289413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032813358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133119035","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.18820719","title":"Access Denied: Barriers to Legal Redress in Urban Slums of Senegal 2005","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Focus group; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Slum; Quarter (Canadian coin); Local government; Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.07672735785617908,"score_gpt":0.45401004803093314,"score_spread":0.3772826901747541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133119035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60180277,0.000012133004,0.000011379254,0.050361812,0.0002446797,0.00034856953,0.000011359014,0.0000015175171,0.34720576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97305185,0.0000039660436,0.0027586059,0.00080794265,0.00023861745,0.00001945399,0.0000045630395,0.000005425991,0.023109604],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989611,0.0001386729,0.0002564624,0.00017902651,0.00023923776,0.00022552663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992992,0.00009810967,0.000105055784,0.00016643258,0.00011282867,0.00021836348],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001062503,0.00006164885,0.00011174243,0.00013497238,0.00021028094,0.00042832817,0.00071767793,0.000063345804,0.013911395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010505771,0.000066146604,0.000019706336,0.00075372925,0.00008027764,0.0023304895,0.000105909945,0.0001713003,0.00024681506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032025325,0.00074368675,0.12284762,0.000009997261,0.00006768064,0.000013528459,0.31972104,0.00093529886,0.0016170337,0.04015308,0.2920078,0.22156298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018281084,0.000008968332,0.0041711736,0.000011525096,0.0000048351562,4.8231493e-7,0.007867074,0.000013343869,0.001537184,0.000025827863,0.9860835,0.000093287315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017314186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08512314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6940757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012590883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018373033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133153297","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.18820718","title":"Access Denied: Barriers to Legal Redress in Urban Slums of Senegal 2005","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Focus group; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Slum; Quarter (Canadian coin); Local government; Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.0523195478751605,"score_gpt":0.35459589738185915,"score_spread":0.3022763495066986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133153297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21892764,0.00004447151,0.0006109321,0.06556872,0.00032720043,0.00080508215,0.0001109609,0.00040455922,0.71320045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99372923,0.000027127977,0.00032769152,0.0008350281,0.00032136764,1.0178695e-7,0.000105436615,0.00025590282,0.004398115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815905,0.0004767703,0.00030055427,0.00025481614,0.00045041036,0.00035837162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986546,0.00004895938,0.00011742766,0.00026311565,0.00057134527,0.00034452093],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014823065,0.00008441585,0.000111521214,0.00039657642,0.0016120273,0.000776733,0.00102542,0.00006448553,0.024547031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037946946,0.00009873163,0.00002991928,0.0014513421,0.00017987787,0.001396161,0.00036221187,0.00030883748,0.0017646211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000122004516,0.00027250167,0.00039195878,0.000024291963,0.000028886981,0.0000048807183,0.045300066,0.0004634774,0.0014695841,0.11478833,0.7935953,0.043538712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022393932,0.00003217668,0.0016762939,0.00001422563,0.0000044674794,0.0000041979497,0.0035311475,0.00004648044,0.00034823795,0.000056081328,0.99395114,0.00011159257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013908132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021448832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7748016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029076167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082954815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135160335","doi":"","title":"Doing Feminist Legal Work. Best Practice Guide 6","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Irish Research Council; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Best practice; Conversation; Value (mathematics); Power (physics); Conversation analysis; Legal practice","score_opus":0.03924397688400463,"score_gpt":0.40694989639701956,"score_spread":0.3677059195130149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135160335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034466726,0.000013674933,0.00024538592,0.17348628,0.0003605123,0.00029852864,0.000010324837,0.000087175176,0.82205147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.483309,0.00021970225,0.002529965,0.0008115288,0.00024091933,0.000003279843,0.00002144571,0.000010700666,0.51285344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966237,0.0010064141,0.00024103263,0.00039131564,0.0010616645,0.00067588215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592555,0.0017740163,0.00013736765,0.00037113245,0.0015149565,0.00027696043],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032951615,0.00012302364,0.00014943688,0.00066726457,0.0031344416,0.00056242937,0.00067085936,0.00017563274,0.001356476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048606307,0.0001496046,0.000079662444,0.004350823,0.0007161119,0.0021103593,0.00025892112,0.00132495,0.00043385534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007633902,0.00034317016,0.0020147304,0.000012254706,0.00005939512,0.00020133259,0.002967803,0.000004604564,0.000009214758,0.71479607,0.27652034,0.002994749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021552843,0.000035463087,0.00049941527,0.00005302353,0.000027741184,0.0000013738974,0.09331036,0.0000010468284,0.000021253227,0.00015013965,0.90555716,0.0001274926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05907916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013794748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7146459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054797827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005811835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135338846","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice in Rural Communities: Global Perspectives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ANU Open Research (Australian National University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Rural area; Social justice; Diversity (politics); Rural management","score_opus":0.4726175598594464,"score_gpt":0.5646288043336498,"score_spread":0.09201124447420339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135338846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004902007,0.0000049529835,0.0000027527678,0.09577937,0.000288231,0.0009971947,0.00034561922,0.000042101325,0.9020496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011201303,0.0001950422,0.00008741903,0.00039404063,0.0003717966,0.000012281053,0.00028972857,0.000015537351,0.98743284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963108,0.0010756315,0.00020990589,0.0002616531,0.0016096559,0.00053236017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949521,0.0014607238,0.00011176878,0.0002471721,0.0029483223,0.00027991412],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032069408,0.00015385277,0.00020360564,0.0012765237,0.0015170958,0.0017989634,0.0034547413,0.00028003662,0.002658397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018772201,0.00020108026,0.000057580095,0.004911833,0.0005969595,0.0029759686,0.0010143665,0.0014410947,0.0011754686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003704638,0.000058962083,0.00013357736,0.00001124647,0.00002415158,0.000017815626,0.009752408,0.000014298113,1.3767361e-7,0.5231661,0.46664143,0.00014277258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020149117,0.000025381443,0.0013590943,0.00011889237,0.000011518625,5.492478e-7,0.21444088,0.0000011482941,2.1906769e-7,0.02136136,0.762306,0.00017351247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08718114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111627296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50180477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058720047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014626133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139171276","doi":"","title":"Navigating the Gendered Landscape: The Impact of Institutional Participation and Professional Culture in Shaping Inequality","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Earnings; Workforce; Agency (philosophy); Inequality; Perception; Equity (law); Job security; Valuation (finance); Masculinity; Wage","score_opus":0.07466627033786667,"score_gpt":0.4398883844645561,"score_spread":0.3652221141266894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139171276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96392864,0.0010792828,0.000052072526,0.008737076,0.0003952316,0.0005299309,0.0000411236,0.000007915472,0.025228752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970343,0.00066291174,0.00010378946,0.000036318233,0.00005287038,0.000002469333,0.00017018015,0.0000031257273,0.001934033],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982014,0.00067318464,0.0002860038,0.00022781381,0.00042059692,0.00019105604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978875,0.00047172498,0.0008533823,0.00018326259,0.00055247184,0.00005165417],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012222982,0.00015671203,0.0002554621,0.000029175122,0.0014827119,0.000050858434,0.00035045182,0.0002503191,0.0034353503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061923463,0.00011800628,0.00012738035,0.0004973831,0.00034496823,0.001060581,0.00007359333,0.00078448036,0.0000012861988],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024702275,0.00027981057,0.023161061,0.00016642916,0.00017155611,6.334298e-7,0.92989427,0.00040448236,0.0002566966,0.015936062,0.0005867738,0.028895216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029518068,0.000030013693,0.6085265,0.00030173553,0.00006423811,1.935122e-7,0.38873377,0.001549054,0.0000057594593,0.00008199812,0.00032159005,0.000089964735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5229598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2886145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5853655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033712666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025930887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139179727","doi":"","title":"Law & Entrepreneurship in Global Clinical Education","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social entrepreneurship; Mindset; Entrepreneurship; Legal education; Civil society; Globalization; Liability; Legal profession; Commercial law","score_opus":0.053555213159279455,"score_gpt":0.4100427381064112,"score_spread":0.3564875249471317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139179727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17738673,0.00043782056,0.000018018696,0.060533606,0.015234408,0.00058252277,0.00002631114,0.00008828694,0.7456923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562928,0.00018645597,0.0006694566,0.026581798,0.007204605,0.0000518713,0.000028565368,0.000020618443,0.008963794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943749,0.0018413248,0.0013953563,0.0008925621,0.00071823987,0.0007776496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963762,0.00065056223,0.00058844715,0.0008083703,0.00088243437,0.00069395814],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035118498,0.00030796323,0.00039062643,0.00008305658,0.0011747404,0.0010913698,0.00080458715,0.0005334277,0.011858349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034413007,0.00035256756,0.00019162979,0.0023887353,0.0019993284,0.0025480126,0.00012709579,0.0012188111,0.008980292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006257145,0.0013267944,0.0781928,0.000011713849,0.00002545557,0.0000018418214,0.0025247426,6.731772e-7,0.0000060067196,0.8803391,0.025939856,0.011568443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051141414,0.00014767867,0.034202017,0.00009707959,0.000050170438,0.0000041655517,0.004133203,0.000009098059,0.000035412468,0.044459045,0.9159743,0.0003763877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.090805784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18652794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8900345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064269855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064528747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139432441","doi":"","title":"Carey Forward","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Care Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Bar (unit)","score_opus":0.15144683214637333,"score_gpt":0.3902096404696988,"score_spread":0.23876280832332547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139432441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003710207,0.00006280276,0.0004077707,0.027215239,0.0029844008,0.00015877717,0.0000027826304,0.00005729728,0.9654007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.887083,0.00011131816,0.0018600909,0.0031204424,0.00034381408,0.000010230461,0.0000017349436,0.000007050119,0.10746233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884224,0.00015011421,0.0002640674,0.00019414852,0.00026263908,0.00028679482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899334,0.000108490996,0.00013045843,0.00021566512,0.00038013546,0.00017191886],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063958514,0.00009341163,0.00009283763,0.00008294135,0.0006532642,0.00017918207,0.00026212528,0.000120023615,0.12104224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005671083,0.00009098649,0.00006438508,0.0009642111,0.00022473832,0.0013003391,0.000029756955,0.00029811703,0.0042505963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055423397,0.00015416057,0.001524004,0.0000032506653,0.00002028091,6.5116507e-7,0.15468906,2.512757e-8,0.000005913244,0.7780744,0.056485694,0.009037046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007499165,0.000033668493,0.0022482432,0.0000041752965,0.000028114537,6.689248e-7,0.06965815,0.0000055912906,0.00016292534,0.008716217,0.9189212,0.00014609586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034748226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036647422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8833728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069315414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013348528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139685271","doi":"","title":"In Brief","year":2002,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); The arts; Legal education; Class (philosophy); Supreme court; Service (business)","score_opus":0.09007811307973447,"score_gpt":0.39547490952512704,"score_spread":0.3053967964453926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139685271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002592144,0.00011842478,0.000013552501,0.3374587,0.0011148022,0.00007453197,5.117029e-7,0.00001113533,0.6586162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7013385,0.0003539519,0.00014373154,0.010322803,0.00028329826,0.0000044987314,2.3550021e-7,0.0000029351602,0.28755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989927,0.00015932087,0.00025085904,0.0001522915,0.00021275044,0.00023209285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994299,0.00021137114,0.00006941259,0.00012474506,0.000087562934,0.00007701698],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049753033,0.000061600615,0.00007262389,0.00011560592,0.00025102316,0.00025143326,0.0001473109,0.000087759596,0.29801458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006947804,0.00006639626,0.000025705931,0.0018227859,0.00013333104,0.0017289344,0.000013811452,0.0003374181,0.005416131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.305306e-7,0.0002859518,0.0006771534,0.0000018331998,0.00000274886,0.0000016926954,0.0422057,7.885687e-7,0.000004878906,0.5904117,0.35861975,0.0077870484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012608485,0.000009673424,0.0008257463,0.0000040739774,0.0000028585325,6.679872e-7,0.008545066,0.00025197826,0.000009703141,0.002183548,0.98794675,0.00009383384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014739878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047278195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6987464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009020682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001716128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139714201","doi":"","title":"Thinking About Clinical Legal Education:Philosophical and Theoretical Perspectives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Explore Bristol Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Legal practice; Legal education; Clinical Practice; Feature (linguistics); Philosophical methodology","score_opus":0.27335998919225385,"score_gpt":0.5644053134584671,"score_spread":0.29104532426621327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139714201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035515951,0.0049166223,0.000017737433,0.224081,0.0011561111,0.00044759238,0.000010984445,0.000066235356,0.76894855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053387247,0.0076020868,0.001268232,0.0017683232,0.013061681,0.00017834277,0.0001611027,0.00008494852,0.92248803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99256605,0.0027964176,0.00065579574,0.00091101346,0.0024532608,0.00061746064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99140364,0.0041374126,0.00019397005,0.0005975315,0.0031409373,0.00052648963],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0100882305,0.00023998863,0.00044114742,0.00044082577,0.002194032,0.0018071288,0.0008015051,0.00080782356,0.0041808328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01873494,0.00024921712,0.0001793503,0.0007223882,0.0059593827,0.0007462814,0.00036567266,0.0056881914,0.0003816376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021006541,0.00026078578,0.000050666702,0.000022264976,0.000036964284,0.000019367684,0.021239273,1.7167103e-8,2.869013e-7,0.70042545,0.27109733,0.006826598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082048085,0.00004255839,0.00013365792,0.00014225648,0.000017495957,0.000009030487,0.031904418,0.000001253783,3.171107e-7,0.3252603,0.6422319,0.00017479295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006213348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028582176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3751651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008004217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037476897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7159746040","doi":"","title":"Young Lawyers’ Career Prospects:Views on Canadian Energy Law Practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Explore Bristol Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Energy (signal processing); Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.48882655956371424,"score_gpt":0.5421581399441019,"score_spread":0.053331580380387655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7159746040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011878955,0.00013556253,0.000008451358,0.1938884,0.00093167706,0.00026604065,0.00001057089,0.000033091135,0.8035383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9500617,0.0002006092,0.0002138578,0.002780008,0.0010065911,0.0001811223,0.000016286074,0.000023632838,0.045516193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965052,0.0008291434,0.00020650846,0.00036143255,0.0013339715,0.0007637143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961808,0.00063220644,0.00015605718,0.0008898666,0.0015890868,0.0005520096],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045694914,0.00010856609,0.00012802093,0.00025173792,0.007524261,0.0020923314,0.0009952683,0.00014031578,0.0007743617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014488402,0.00011078589,0.00004600759,0.000488636,0.0008335604,0.002311147,0.00007867149,0.00095252506,0.0010716581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019267156,0.00007323562,0.0002469272,0.000002715867,0.00001157315,0.000036989397,0.020996222,3.7876723e-7,0.000010775408,0.7748998,0.20008253,0.0036195884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011605657,0.000047886235,0.0006428214,0.00001875003,0.0000045757283,0.0000031603254,0.020727916,0.0000037451953,0.00006944874,0.0036371737,0.9745967,0.00013176193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9576911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95561683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9488738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011203699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004220861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161978005","doi":"10.82308/5497","title":"Teaching and learning in Canadian legal education: an empirical exploration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socratic method; Teaching method; Empirical research; Legal education; Legal research; Focus (optics); Order (exchange); Socratic questioning","score_opus":0.07896984684809902,"score_gpt":0.4476956829819199,"score_spread":0.36872583613382093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161978005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12649895,0.00005900294,0.000005921443,0.0144672915,0.0011091105,0.00020931203,7.5473685e-7,0.000052939875,0.8575967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6744708,0.00004588556,0.000963996,0.0014011472,0.000506283,0.000069736474,0.0006955376,0.000018179835,0.32182848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983956,0.00070315093,0.0002352739,0.00024290988,0.00017752495,0.0002455384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991932,0.00010315417,0.00012358231,0.00009713954,0.00019493909,0.00028802143],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015237159,0.000111775276,0.0001083746,0.0005088086,0.0012219494,0.00042151802,0.00011950847,0.00026416586,0.0011051155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013556017,0.00012650725,0.000016470456,0.00034431196,0.000032865148,0.0026637923,0.0000033332549,0.0015138825,0.000046350968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012420948,0.00016745033,0.0075071366,0.000020555337,0.0000073235365,0.0000013930114,0.3977412,0.0000013844891,0.0000058839887,0.41323835,0.0056800493,0.17561685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003371543,0.000016121341,0.0086201,0.000021873107,0.000008023821,6.0318644e-7,0.19214119,0.000015603233,0.0000015362663,0.0014971527,0.7974919,0.00015214687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9845916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99682033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7918119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002548002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013480911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162074602","doi":"10.82308/19841","title":"The cost of family law legal services in Canada: a historical and critical analysis of lawyers' business decisions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Practice of law; Legal profession; Scholarship; Legal ethics; Legal advice; Legal opinion; Legal service; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.051981890827558164,"score_gpt":0.40217592833840576,"score_spread":0.3501940375108476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162074602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40130404,0.0019723608,0.000036772526,0.037471212,0.0031849616,0.00051197974,0.00012565867,0.000017227281,0.5553758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958691,0.00017779024,0.00009921525,0.0002773934,0.000035950336,0.000016152511,0.00011724801,0.0000051486104,0.0034020129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984673,0.00016204327,0.00046781803,0.0001473477,0.0006110932,0.00014436655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99571997,0.0020603822,0.00021478145,0.00015505817,0.0017611978,0.00008862926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074563816,0.00008577817,0.00029931014,0.00020865603,0.00026822963,0.00008216687,0.00023063982,0.000117364274,0.00007136201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020252054,0.000066377135,0.000037666876,0.0025847107,0.000118010605,0.00029251556,0.0000130343315,0.00022829292,5.921715e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008597841,0.00015086262,0.0036705178,0.000051697945,0.00021758802,0.0000024729673,0.013020434,0.000028501021,0.000022096496,0.9665379,0.011476553,0.0047353916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014042342,0.000009662254,0.12551576,0.00005685393,0.0006250209,1.8936164e-7,0.15879174,0.0001360182,0.000005001259,0.0014605873,0.7130836,0.00017513518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99810785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96507734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076699216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009827558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7163100280","doi":"","title":"Legal education and teacher training: the role of teaching and learning centers","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Repositorio Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (Universidad de Buenos Aires)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socratic method; Process (computing); Promotion (chess); Face (sociological concept); Legal education; Legal research; Teaching and learning center","score_opus":0.013671733601620153,"score_gpt":0.28344437683170404,"score_spread":0.2697726432300839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7163100280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5868771,0.00047356111,0.00009211665,0.0025756794,0.00029460908,0.0002301641,0.000018512164,0.00007349483,0.40936476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98990685,0.000322595,0.0008970524,0.00019648111,0.0004385084,0.000005800574,0.000019911822,0.000039862352,0.008172963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968921,0.0010130837,0.00040602652,0.000541927,0.0005469485,0.00059994246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741626,0.00095915335,0.00059304683,0.00030150794,0.0002928009,0.0004372136],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011412258,0.00035127127,0.00033814402,0.00066671934,0.0028095243,0.0021978416,0.0005488381,0.00042119125,0.00006519886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011011804,0.00038848733,0.00017265075,0.00070773147,0.0014856689,0.0034401636,0.00022520503,0.0017660833,0.00000946381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003144729,0.0007977905,0.031295553,0.00006976674,0.00030491233,0.00007817196,0.15577644,0.00006475289,0.001021664,0.72769654,0.0011736157,0.081406295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065638515,0.0002253979,0.04388285,0.00031547487,0.00025425962,0.00034434316,0.22476134,0.00032541878,0.000084622414,0.0024062204,0.7262788,0.00046493293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06607424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005132799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72529036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010128166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004870843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164939817","doi":"10.1080/17153379.2011.12559148","title":"Legal Education in Asia: Globalization, Change and Contexts. Routledge Law in Asia, 7.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Legal profession; Legal history; Higher education; Legal realism","score_opus":0.05101347274689451,"score_gpt":0.33257308010628567,"score_spread":0.2815596073593912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164939817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003816113,0.00027632326,0.000037836082,0.006169154,0.0007521677,0.00037541776,0.0000042875386,0.000038126134,0.9885306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633884,0.00008894885,0.00025349137,0.0001410467,0.00018093754,0.00008666509,0.000017395443,0.000008040863,0.0028846122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898607,0.00020311518,0.00023697884,0.00020495137,0.00015697203,0.00021191467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999492,0.000059848277,0.000101966296,0.00012938814,0.00013443723,0.00008237161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064208836,0.000087308814,0.00010840574,0.00016257094,0.00018896937,0.00011897993,0.00011025904,0.000104339226,0.00040058713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002969261,0.000096415664,0.000016214639,0.00080074667,0.00019320614,0.0013618172,0.000016398122,0.00018239194,0.000077519406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008119005,0.00020326274,0.01877228,0.000005861608,0.0000024308208,0.0000011753455,0.079783194,6.149806e-8,0.0000032511878,0.8931524,0.0020050176,0.0060629365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002613977,0.000018993993,0.034825344,0.00003537113,0.0000065620293,0.0000027347749,0.55437833,0.000008428087,0.000020157548,0.007560061,0.4027075,0.0001751681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04002422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060368057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016689111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006850776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9663683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165203122","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0005","title":"Is law an intellectual practice?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.029475989745648953,"score_gpt":0.3601314257086606,"score_spread":0.3306554359630116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165203122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016356212,0.0001380043,0.0008041663,0.040748347,0.00047889276,0.0000430685,0.000002469072,0.000014920575,0.9561345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97505134,0.0004040689,0.004205581,0.0042426344,0.00015756114,3.178497e-8,0.0000015112171,0.000002496297,0.01593479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992891,0.0002407623,0.000094313604,0.000074196636,0.00019116217,0.0001104503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988408,0.00030285658,0.00013219944,0.00009342999,0.0005425927,0.00008811449],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006365205,0.00004008146,0.000068093555,0.0000228696,0.0015817285,0.00011685671,0.00025741855,0.000058504662,0.008939715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042070323,0.00004752802,0.000043851647,0.000094067276,0.00027473856,0.0031586315,0.000024069417,0.00024831967,0.000021818005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044807235,0.00011941612,0.000031070405,0.0000014669905,0.000038709994,0.0000027340564,0.071062654,0.0000010092283,0.000016043015,0.8896283,0.0365811,0.0024726975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014665921,0.000028682589,0.000060835733,0.000008791498,0.00003206086,0.0000033162084,0.14110063,0.00000557942,0.000019931022,0.0014920702,0.85706085,0.00004059008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4118523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41031766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97341573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031958576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066575524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W74597807","doi":"","title":"Dispelling Stereotypes of Lawyers in Today's World","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.06180371161904504,"score_gpt":0.35239541141702035,"score_spread":0.29059169979797533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W74597807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8412141,0.00040487855,0.00041598827,0.018382618,0.0010480095,0.000092615606,0.0000026843356,0.000018172488,0.13842092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99376994,0.00079145934,0.00069844583,0.00054081174,0.00025536126,0.0000010672048,8.5480144e-7,0.0000055029404,0.003936551],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894416,0.00017424156,0.0002949886,0.00007090584,0.00033843832,0.00017727676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909896,0.00027914965,0.00020017057,0.00007464354,0.00026826133,0.00007884253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010108781,0.000053039523,0.0001013306,0.00024147498,0.0003716499,0.00006800604,0.00013377517,0.00003569368,0.00074294204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003448567,0.000051405685,0.000043000342,0.0007553213,0.00016123863,0.00052138383,0.000004290905,0.00044981993,0.000045251545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002230978,0.0007472111,0.2082274,0.000022469103,0.000088921995,0.00021084343,0.38544327,0.00058137876,0.00043507598,0.29700655,0.09975576,0.007258018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034897076,0.00001911365,0.012010733,0.000045923483,0.000010269275,0.00007699607,0.009515214,0.000028465633,0.000048937116,0.0039213276,0.97384316,0.00013086644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001081985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004522363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87408745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079078236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008462734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81346947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W768228461","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1031","title":"Taking the Stand: Access to Justice for Witnesses with Mental Disabilities in Sexual Assault Cases","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Psychology; Cross-examination; Credibility; Adversarial system; Witness; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Adjudication; Law; Social psychology; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.17586761981313812,"score_gpt":0.46419973751623367,"score_spread":0.2883321177030955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W768228461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3695193,0.00037086295,0.0020146891,0.14445128,0.0029118245,0.0010320484,0.000058999965,0.00005126288,0.47958976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615586,0.000014557386,0.00080893625,0.0014310643,0.001015899,0.0000494603,0.000002766114,0.000010238332,0.0005112375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987635,0.00020308861,0.00020456203,0.00009301825,0.00038525395,0.00035057144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809617,0.0012415664,0.0001799766,0.000093870956,0.00024856973,0.00013985287],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016654669,0.00008477701,0.000093565286,0.00004616922,0.001971276,0.00084779767,0.00027896286,0.000042787753,0.0004633069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018070483,0.000055876222,0.000020228099,0.00031994982,0.00018496737,0.002529665,0.000027440305,0.00036037384,0.000006894126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013589772,0.00026654958,0.022191377,0.000026880234,0.00003096936,0.0000021962062,0.08013304,0.00008604922,0.000026157315,0.8881406,0.0057934024,0.0031668432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005917011,0.00016547227,0.009339239,0.000078407626,0.00011119634,0.0001545891,0.5993483,0.000010985106,0.000111564084,0.005053668,0.38473794,0.00029692502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.084680505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4798528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.883087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018850196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046096515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W782106486","doi":"","title":"Quebec's Bill 1: A Case Study in Anti-Corruption Legislation and the Barriers to Evidence-Based Law-Making","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science; Language change; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09216367684182367,"score_gpt":0.38724132922455684,"score_spread":0.2950776523827332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W782106486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91249686,0.00013134035,0.00014153834,0.076675095,0.0006358848,0.0011497234,0.0000022971494,0.00006508872,0.008702149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99178255,0.0000048565494,0.0002435515,0.0072705075,0.00023901879,0.00010092719,0.0000015039396,0.000008708773,0.00034838286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978158,0.0010334069,0.00028478642,0.00024494913,0.0004045451,0.00021654298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984954,0.00065875205,0.0001312939,0.00024218878,0.00020574276,0.00026659615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041810013,0.00010043353,0.00013965549,0.00010807739,0.0007916948,0.0006687125,0.00015410264,0.000067897134,0.0001274324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056634136,0.00007339856,0.000025923922,0.00092659757,0.00024440337,0.0019370529,0.00003231347,0.000317586,0.00004802988],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003178556,0.0003040054,0.15019749,0.000012134971,0.000030410396,0.00017380014,0.24807844,0.001341453,0.00004982596,0.5908788,0.0045121387,0.0041036694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045000017,0.00022974657,0.02196662,0.0002557152,0.00009890605,0.000045580502,0.44892067,0.00088028994,0.00002966937,0.004019689,0.5184083,0.0006448425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6584204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75366074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5868591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026502833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012809808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67800444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W792452101","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2343107","title":"A Context of Justice: Ontario's Justices of the Peace From the Mewett Report to the Present","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Political science; Law; Public administration; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.027303329724707736,"score_gpt":0.3396250838070234,"score_spread":0.31232175408231566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W792452101","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4466724,0.00135374,0.00043797336,0.5276792,0.0014123876,0.0005849741,0.0000040823775,0.000007995093,0.021847242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849972,0.00027138524,0.000043680328,0.0012083907,0.000607409,0.000016739445,9.539267e-7,0.000005342318,0.012848901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801046,0.00038131443,0.00037755448,0.00010043722,0.00054756296,0.00058268564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977056,0.0007552199,0.00060451374,0.0003240975,0.00056124147,0.00004932891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031309223,0.00007087272,0.00010381721,0.000023574465,0.00087331655,0.00014278562,0.00076124835,0.000043367247,0.0007936281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021553433,0.000033741,0.00008323538,0.00040218528,0.00018626984,0.0003405563,0.00005226818,0.0015531791,0.00002516618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041624826,0.00020876178,0.010744164,0.0000060768953,0.00036353292,8.241593e-7,0.19911426,0.00009395353,0.0003653665,0.672666,0.09747942,0.018916003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013800894,0.000050206454,0.021649648,0.00002097489,0.00022373682,0.000032413293,0.24241644,0.000008374756,0.00009295273,0.02832361,0.70697004,0.00007361276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48558825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69040996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6443424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043692125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011177843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99442786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80060253","doi":"","title":"Black Bay Street Lawyers and Other Oxymora","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bay; Law; Political science; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.029001481220952096,"score_gpt":0.3516721106032808,"score_spread":0.3226706293823287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80060253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7126274,0.0019057821,0.0007323983,0.0623399,0.00095427956,0.00011244675,0.0000026990342,0.000052524,0.22127259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98791516,0.00061057985,0.00008649565,0.0010944701,0.00094798516,0.0000015414671,5.646054e-7,0.0000081543185,0.00933507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828756,0.00015913205,0.00012209643,0.00006284482,0.00019384058,0.00117451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995592,0.00008383365,0.00010246882,0.000060614253,0.00006955349,0.00012427676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002717034,0.00005766371,0.00005830899,0.00006176598,0.0004922093,0.00013043976,0.00010615433,0.000052314514,0.00040947233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026129073,0.000051990733,0.000025268504,0.00023336765,0.00013194361,0.0008261499,0.000008729892,0.0011595108,0.000084058345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004366919,0.000045828263,0.03260704,6.957181e-7,0.000029202145,7.618764e-8,0.010529547,5.19571e-7,0.000013911681,0.9494927,0.0014431193,0.0058329883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015152612,0.000026347698,0.0017955606,0.000003140864,0.00001681199,0.000016566371,0.05409538,0.000001730862,0.000007668658,0.03373948,0.91005397,0.000091800925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014993593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0097250715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91575325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033727492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026142937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5426818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W816251261","doi":"","title":"Legal Education at St. John's: A Modern Approach","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"St. John's law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04647324269966916,"score_gpt":0.3728569035166119,"score_spread":0.3263836608169427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W816251261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067215227,0.022672087,0.00016523186,0.08404616,0.0009473769,0.0015914143,0.00001715214,0.0001359101,0.8897525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61495423,0.08388977,0.011982043,0.117553495,0.0035859474,0.0037192332,0.00089394633,0.00014163755,0.16327971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997719,0.00050928444,0.00048156822,0.00037574046,0.00052761025,0.0003868002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823284,0.00014702838,0.00031226745,0.0004869586,0.0005917133,0.00022921454],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011812506,0.0001872625,0.00030257562,0.000065296605,0.0009321508,0.0004142099,0.00040792333,0.000114482194,0.0074907043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070658885,0.00016873298,0.00012859922,0.0008787247,0.00023260142,0.0020137185,0.000063818516,0.00038227203,0.0017416681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013228926,0.00021869721,0.000034495748,0.00035347414,0.00001725869,2.4600087e-7,0.0012834207,6.460175e-7,0.000008369788,0.6236606,0.33998093,0.034440536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006848448,0.000011301161,0.00010642882,0.00030159086,0.000055613782,0.0000056153144,0.0005275639,0.000015736874,0.0000028563773,0.004156229,0.99453294,0.00021565912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020053772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020399592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7264728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003142517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016257762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W825474895","doi":"","title":"Taking a Dip in the Supreme Court Clerk Pool: Gender-Based Discrepancies in Clerk Selection","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Selection (genetic algorithm); Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09085787691393424,"score_gpt":0.39003363429190696,"score_spread":0.29917575737797275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W825474895","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010218002,0.005613297,0.00058600697,0.6612376,0.0006105583,0.0018293781,0.000007001618,0.00013924073,0.31975895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9530022,0.0013780119,0.00027486242,0.044862244,0.00019224384,0.00014599897,0.000016586098,0.000008202933,0.00011962374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973293,0.0014574792,0.00037803585,0.00020066842,0.00035756823,0.00027698328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885,0.0005683936,0.00022550573,0.0002178838,0.00010006832,0.000038169008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048120767,0.0001055097,0.00019645857,0.00006342025,0.00036187845,0.00018873968,0.00027841932,0.00006110566,0.0005203439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016752062,0.00008168171,0.000062557716,0.0013877525,0.000114493494,0.00046209176,0.000013931935,0.00040051594,0.000065213055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005646126,0.00014869875,0.0063125435,0.00036259333,0.000006597116,0.0000012352666,0.0031899537,0.000014721666,0.000017047776,0.9643283,0.013248341,0.0123643065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109460474,0.000011432407,0.010631891,0.00039317086,0.00001980148,0.0000011907179,0.00031604667,0.00006383202,0.0000044541507,0.0017081755,0.9866241,0.00011641578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022498595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059144467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9733758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013733908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027552329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W83908100","doi":"","title":"McGill's Integrated Civil and Common Law Program.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal education; Political science; Higher education; Civil law (Civil law); Civil rights; Common law; Sociology; Commercial law","score_opus":0.05009939989880461,"score_gpt":0.320135969415673,"score_spread":0.2700365695168684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W83908100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23032312,0.00012140539,1.4602651e-7,0.004607574,0.0006735887,0.00068983797,0.00027316058,0.00061147026,0.7626997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872729,0.00024265927,0.0009789362,0.0041095726,0.00007198139,0.00013838244,0.00003940295,0.000051458246,0.007094715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967571,0.0007683356,0.0005629115,0.000584194,0.00064492645,0.00068254006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778324,0.0005251693,0.000288914,0.00045050785,0.00050314213,0.0004490018],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014640017,0.00032001242,0.0003253565,0.00020084532,0.0043442426,0.00039969568,0.00046509027,0.0003357718,0.0024538713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013849977,0.00032659725,0.000106646796,0.0015684863,0.00050590694,0.0025455353,0.00011710229,0.001330314,0.0006313495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000118975,0.00041155485,0.00009066511,0.00001405847,0.00004034851,0.000010267016,0.000091943184,0.0000013999781,0.00046896047,0.8043402,0.00018499121,0.19433372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040634087,0.000097003125,0.00023908258,0.000041399624,0.000045097026,0.000014403317,0.0011157627,0.000038092327,0.00085007015,0.022839528,0.9738939,0.00041936958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01436781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038239148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97370887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044124835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050858573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W857062757","doi":"10.29173/alr1282","title":"Civil Justice Reform and Mandatory Civil Mediation in Saskatchewan: Lessons from a Maturing Program","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Adversarial system; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Referral; Civil procedure; Flexibility (engineering); Restorative justice; Conciliation; Party-directed mediation; Public relations; Alternative dispute resolution; Psychology; Public administration; Management","score_opus":0.03526037886867344,"score_gpt":0.3862143226411867,"score_spread":0.35095394377251327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W857062757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013647295,0.040376242,0.000008172872,0.39423403,0.0005516584,0.0012753512,0.000010172124,0.00009591257,0.5498012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9288788,0.047849696,0.0017691931,0.017099284,0.00070387527,0.0002873606,0.00009213155,0.000019727495,0.003299929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884963,0.00018818627,0.00032498344,0.00021107751,0.00021881712,0.0002072862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901456,0.0004410984,0.00016484996,0.00018758675,0.00009666682,0.00009524242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086415734,0.00009737104,0.00018419226,0.000035437093,0.0002831684,0.000130025,0.00014269962,0.00008013508,0.00078696315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074167567,0.000089890906,0.000027839325,0.0005143325,0.00009852935,0.0009984241,0.000030359028,0.00027298328,0.00012824958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008960822,0.0003932789,0.0006452294,0.0009786921,0.000037857655,0.000002111669,0.039748892,7.7385613e-7,0.000012654854,0.5588652,0.012890776,0.3864156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011670634,0.0000065097483,0.000862249,0.0006016844,0.000068366935,9.696292e-7,0.0021936102,0.000008825721,0.0000043078494,0.0003708949,0.9956473,0.00011853922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.118513435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8541491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98275656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020728902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041056518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88735646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W857324172","doi":"","title":"Executive Fraud and Canada's Regulation of Executive Compensation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Executive functions; Executive dysfunction; Psychology; Executive branch; Compensation (psychology); Business; Accounting; Political science; Neuroscience; Cognition; Law; Social psychology; Neuropsychology; Legislature","score_opus":0.0254898273698599,"score_gpt":0.3352291434851856,"score_spread":0.30973931611532574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W857324172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20796642,0.000015317268,0.002421705,0.01616106,0.0002912096,0.0001697562,0.0000034545442,0.000019094072,0.772952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99205625,0.0000066298003,0.00097429124,0.00047040184,0.000059932132,0.0000012266231,0.000007358347,0.0000020470538,0.00642188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940616,0.00005407572,0.00015216501,0.00007489264,0.00021749562,0.00009519448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991147,0.00035066486,0.00011709533,0.000052638465,0.0003159978,0.000048900598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065993686,0.000034529377,0.00005285393,0.000055076205,0.00021986269,0.000023380788,0.000038375983,0.000037382793,0.00025713188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044138066,0.000034729073,0.0000071269233,0.00026228648,0.00010483086,0.0002907098,0.0000066468124,0.00007091732,0.0000016247916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013581263,0.000024783018,0.011606755,0.0000027910503,0.000008561921,2.4214967e-7,0.015987556,0.0000021445446,0.00054148945,0.95086193,0.01746617,0.0034839953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002015666,0.000019510226,0.36774972,0.000010293701,0.000013296039,0.0000011615803,0.07717796,0.000034083736,0.0033108136,0.006733741,0.5446138,0.00013407347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.917315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96200734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9441282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112451744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088999595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28154135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W863058917","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canada: Introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.11595307671573389,"score_gpt":0.47031258667384346,"score_spread":0.35435950995810955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W863058917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000036810103,0.00007319818,0.000006742992,0.41552913,0.011010378,0.0001540627,0.000022407656,0.00004434679,0.5731229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002109973,0.00036466058,0.0009589256,0.0032642789,0.03223281,0.000053361116,0.00026693346,0.000018243178,0.9607308],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971355,0.0005107496,0.0003033601,0.000315982,0.0013140396,0.00042032113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649155,0.0006150746,0.00013766813,0.0003990372,0.0022066892,0.00015000215],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003928848,0.0001051449,0.00013549198,0.00018243938,0.001462257,0.00045774804,0.000508394,0.00044743222,0.021487292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010103066,0.000102533806,0.000029127013,0.0015402618,0.0003428477,0.00044146032,0.000048623428,0.0025826872,0.00028537595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.1786154e-7,0.000013429579,0.000016359696,0.0000061723185,0.000007972977,6.6095896e-7,0.0005296299,1.5099816e-7,0.0000013549526,0.21387202,0.78288704,0.0026642773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021390168,0.0000045722463,0.00006667747,0.000005612751,0.0000066236257,9.506968e-7,0.0076545756,3.4983023e-7,0.00000930969,0.002759184,0.98935086,0.000119914286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99722195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41226485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011423224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050641757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W8709582","doi":"10.29173/alr34","title":"Decolonizing Law School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Colonization; Decolonization; Agency (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Process (computing); Political science; Social science; Psychology; Ecology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.042240651802407235,"score_gpt":0.3898735604903233,"score_spread":0.3476329086879161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W8709582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011301365,0.0036562248,0.000015172372,0.14138828,0.00034254685,0.00020537022,2.3333217e-7,0.000025646515,0.85425353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6746675,0.013658562,0.0010932516,0.28276917,0.0008052152,0.000118698495,0.000017035369,0.000021651796,0.026848925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899584,0.00032218843,0.00020920555,0.00013199223,0.00016351636,0.0001772769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986691,0.00074366125,0.00010701587,0.00022291874,0.00013104298,0.00012627456],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011102096,0.00006314709,0.00013427027,0.000011277178,0.00061805604,0.00014186576,0.00019500843,0.000042561103,0.0040274556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034333118,0.000057908208,0.000048902388,0.00035782962,0.000119645614,0.0006240032,0.000017024986,0.0001776848,0.0029538153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.4389124e-7,0.000016240783,0.00008576039,0.00006709376,0.0000045588968,6.718071e-8,0.00027533888,4.1974335e-8,0.0000012297266,0.971762,0.02497704,0.0028103632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003589245,0.0000055616165,0.000039718227,0.00028155165,0.000025112588,8.252636e-7,0.00003625423,8.9642805e-7,0.0000034644584,0.0026447326,0.9968455,0.000080530626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09627266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13342735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045971694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021328332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88085452","doi":"","title":"Beyond Case Reporters: Using Newspapers to Supplement the Legal-Historical Record","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Inclusion (mineral); Law; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.030663710577035985,"score_gpt":0.36623187784697897,"score_spread":0.335568167269943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88085452","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46443823,0.000104033934,0.0025260525,0.49842393,0.006305013,0.00033864536,0.000001692733,0.0000397941,0.027822591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820492,0.000101832884,0.0015345134,0.0019578403,0.0020363955,0.0000080343625,0.0000011083582,0.000012550782,0.012298502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978018,0.00018048545,0.00033272395,0.00015031954,0.00035634253,0.0011783194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903953,0.00013658266,0.00023712426,0.00019425323,0.00022632604,0.0001661869],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046067983,0.00008708109,0.00008846012,0.00010317414,0.0018711851,0.00036759287,0.00024934288,0.000064488486,0.0007276353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000995721,0.000067144254,0.00007047419,0.0005548516,0.000059529055,0.0005955139,0.00002128741,0.0031091077,0.000027334338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026574275,0.00011685956,0.0014986551,9.811938e-7,0.00007995633,0.000102824946,0.015229831,0.000009567996,0.0011515795,0.91081846,0.03274226,0.038222436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000962291,0.000055908895,0.000029899937,0.0000015161029,0.000029871637,0.0032357976,0.0309368,0.0000065959275,0.000008832373,0.020894438,0.9446023,0.00010181053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04810826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2744036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91186005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023970963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0099163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88726734","doi":"","title":"UVic Law and the Debate Over Accreditation of a New Law School at Trinity Western University","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018340034067072214,"score_gpt":0.3098548212618925,"score_spread":0.29151478719482027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88726734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74686414,0.00035795436,0.0017253193,0.08494608,0.0004810125,0.00024401175,0.0000021597134,0.000029909437,0.16534944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98957115,0.00043776465,0.000027125336,0.0008993805,0.00028694322,2.714814e-7,0.0000011310574,0.0000032635626,0.0087729925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988222,0.00040002,0.00012346041,0.000069692,0.00019466522,0.0003899599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925655,0.00029812244,0.00020102854,0.000075263124,0.000090605725,0.00007845581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025447325,0.00004718226,0.00007947673,0.000034924808,0.0008154333,0.000087453875,0.00015402563,0.00004325491,0.00012573318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000290931,0.00003696624,0.000036298046,0.00020736498,0.0002420476,0.00058854604,0.000019863546,0.00076396746,0.000021083948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008390348,0.000013102793,0.001115968,9.565057e-7,0.000025429596,6.823917e-8,0.0029899112,0.0000022798672,0.000013034471,0.9947359,0.0003648427,0.00065462757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019001287,0.000067193156,0.003456118,0.000007933027,0.000060439867,0.00001968641,0.008584884,0.000017287777,0.000019825053,0.30761725,0.6781627,0.00008657279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022179065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15690292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68711865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039625724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027134311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W90589339","doi":"10.29173/alr330","title":"Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism by Terence C. Halliday, Lucien Karpik, and Malcolm M. Feeley, eds.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Mainstream; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Law; Political science; Human rights; Sociology; Civil society; Legal pluralism; Legal profession; Law and economics; Legal realism","score_opus":0.13537441581156456,"score_gpt":0.4485885072371355,"score_spread":0.31321409142557094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W90589339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008986096,0.031613015,0.000015809856,0.71631795,0.00024503144,0.0014649954,0.0000527366,0.000020495834,0.24128388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97027916,0.0019243341,0.0006397795,0.024876287,0.00013566903,0.000039491628,0.000010822309,0.0000051046522,0.0020893565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985959,0.00028232983,0.00036638105,0.00020713801,0.00019521035,0.0003530651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739546,0.0018784543,0.00015635739,0.00015877058,0.00026916378,0.00014180031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005146842,0.000120274046,0.00035690522,0.000014908854,0.00060054444,0.00011911855,0.00019021635,0.000047482343,0.00007341076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001473852,0.00008383145,0.00005659925,0.0002347172,0.0008993841,0.0004024083,0.000048096616,0.0001629776,0.0000036848282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023409518,0.000045899604,0.00010202045,0.00013790722,0.00002089319,7.289325e-8,0.0014505293,1.6514418e-8,0.00001642082,0.96928465,0.028425636,0.000513624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016080237,0.000054624863,0.0008300725,0.0004971674,0.00009402521,0.000005747445,0.0008832392,0.000009953679,0.000031572177,0.010716968,0.9865876,0.00012822953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013519756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038174996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96129304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003950424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016985917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W919743085","doi":"","title":"Restorative Justice: Reflections on Theory and Practice from within the Nova Scotia Community University Research Alliance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Alliance; Conceptualization; Sociology; Nova scotia; Economic Justice; Political science; Psychology; Law; Criminology","score_opus":0.21776419128824523,"score_gpt":0.47940503212936186,"score_spread":0.2616408408411166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W919743085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10542189,0.00009151352,0.0003435716,0.19618058,0.001405446,0.00033661549,0.000015020556,0.000041352512,0.696164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907756,0.00012388604,0.0016458102,0.004150923,0.00052797253,0.0000015212067,0.0000033338617,0.000008249011,0.0027627454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98747045,0.011546273,0.0001645561,0.00011371154,0.00049355725,0.00021147213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98579484,0.012189988,0.00024847485,0.0002721125,0.0013441782,0.00015042246],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011210155,0.000074415475,0.000077253986,0.000062652856,0.010005795,0.0008609469,0.0004330333,0.00008535993,0.00064747623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010587238,0.000058191916,0.00002204203,0.000786889,0.0011402554,0.0021539705,0.00006919585,0.0035218247,0.00030034996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111919624,0.00014470165,0.000045550056,0.0000014732359,0.000035727087,0.0000040659174,0.09302473,0.000012988774,0.00011569498,0.8839188,0.022271395,0.00031295203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016513608,0.00007142966,0.0020125178,0.00002652001,0.000047131092,0.000018807903,0.45606697,0.000003918553,0.000017394108,0.059222136,0.48226658,0.0000814602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17529595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15180837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8853537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022139469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078745454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W942947213","doi":"","title":"Communal reflections on the workplace: Locating learning for the legal professional","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of South Africa; University of Waterloo; University of New England; Flinders University; University of Dhaka; University of Surrey; University of Technology Sydney; Simon Fraser University; Murdoch University; Massey University; University of Johannesburg; Central Queensland University; Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand; Australian Catholic University; University of Waikato","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Situated; Bachelor; Situated learning; Curriculum; Psychology; Pedagogy; Reflective practice; Work (physics); Legal profession; Public relations; Sociology; Medical education; Political science; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.1540286847527397,"score_gpt":0.3956027086911646,"score_spread":0.2415740239384249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W942947213","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03664699,0.00002464209,0.0008747743,0.023234451,0.008094287,0.0013961438,0.000008960303,0.00024809432,0.9294717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81725395,0.000046756893,0.0001874138,0.00006792858,0.0011833311,0.0000037996504,0.0000060341513,0.000014581059,0.18123618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951329,0.0029000363,0.00016321408,0.00035218577,0.0008719613,0.0005796539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918499,0.005718911,0.00019375396,0.00048618796,0.0015517509,0.00019947374],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029760776,0.00015195034,0.00013061994,0.00046673717,0.017746797,0.0002863952,0.0013752162,0.00020729385,0.00029040274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015746781,0.00012504836,0.00013375987,0.0029029634,0.0009000013,0.0010219944,0.00023319367,0.002133238,0.000055875484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055092486,0.00021072409,0.0023827536,0.0000073768488,0.000118497665,0.00001869169,0.034254793,0.00002679937,0.00031214152,0.94454885,0.017461283,0.00010716337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031570377,0.00011378321,0.00085942046,0.00003164263,0.000040852916,0.0000023846385,0.12461832,0.000057154237,0.00009959498,0.00024683922,0.8734794,0.000134865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010433406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029877245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.944302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011639831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026397135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W976796446","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Trusts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.19202299229302386,"score_gpt":0.4753388452760368,"score_spread":0.283315852983013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W976796446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035070453,0.00057393167,6.3710263e-7,0.067240104,0.0014163608,0.00032375593,0.000051860152,0.00003435505,0.9300083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056589447,0.0013073976,0.00031240098,0.007345921,0.0015275528,0.00009526833,0.00020187003,0.000030983865,0.9325892],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970532,0.0006586803,0.0004064704,0.00034854095,0.00064923347,0.0008838869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980047,0.0005153808,0.00010283549,0.00032884287,0.00060837984,0.00043986973],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036464045,0.00014863182,0.0002008391,0.0006745835,0.0010734362,0.0005965177,0.00080195203,0.00059344067,0.015904142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018643002,0.00014755828,0.00004417553,0.001326066,0.0005661761,0.0006401702,0.000043983175,0.0014872917,0.0010816071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.3439656e-7,0.000029374773,0.00041392766,0.000006800627,0.000005326227,0.000002289067,0.008407522,3.5471963e-8,2.4262175e-7,0.40928745,0.58093894,0.00090736436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050927436,0.000016219483,0.00006400823,0.000042244144,0.000004936477,4.1045382e-7,0.021313855,3.9151652e-7,0.000008459675,0.004551078,0.9737668,0.0001806564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99930286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40473637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007930331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010557522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98103576","doi":"","title":"The Problem of Partisan Experts and the Potential for Reform through Concurrent Evidence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œReview of litigation","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Law; Contempt; Jury; Political science; German; Civil procedure; Competence (human resources); Ex parte; Psychology","score_opus":0.05576304141928773,"score_gpt":0.3963926964728035,"score_spread":0.3406296550535158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98103576","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010194344,0.09597729,0.0019061189,0.86676204,0.0007653922,0.006107308,0.000009850886,0.000024245059,0.018253425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96189445,0.034695175,0.0003733749,0.0017839873,0.00015569315,0.000617127,0.000005301413,0.00000355929,0.0004713462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887186,0.0003426803,0.00037097197,0.000074863805,0.00023969075,0.00009993345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978999,0.0009602077,0.00043251744,0.00015287574,0.0005353093,0.000019213563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022189994,0.000048338043,0.00010558383,0.0000064229034,0.00055849104,0.00008248493,0.00018700017,0.000022322256,0.00007786126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005789585,0.000021692282,0.000053378768,0.00019543132,0.0006384083,0.00063181575,0.000018546998,0.00006825649,0.0000044181334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008168608,0.000025065641,0.00003656069,0.0005514148,0.000018963363,6.3799184e-9,0.018651482,4.6194668e-7,0.00007177334,0.8528835,0.017585931,0.11016666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028917284,0.00004454695,0.0006949889,0.001857969,0.00008231003,0.0000011261785,0.016304258,0.0001209109,0.00016698547,0.06472736,0.9156276,0.00008278025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032364877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031709977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9517001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029407638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021757517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48926228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W986005766","doi":"","title":"The time to disposition of a disciplinary matter before the College of Chiropractors of Ontario","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Europe PMC (PubMed Central)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statute; Mandate; Discipline; Political science; Law; Agency (philosophy); Jurisdiction; Charter; Medicine; Public administration; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.022841226645958137,"score_gpt":0.27113650891618185,"score_spread":0.2482952822702237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W986005766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80182654,0.000039886887,0.000004527803,0.098192476,0.00042309504,0.0005813541,0.00006355643,0.0000135592745,0.09885498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94496185,0.000012761342,0.00007277114,0.0002748646,0.00010243488,0.000021193177,0.0000042699708,0.000008552789,0.05454132],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987479,0.00022437001,0.00031646455,0.000104943465,0.00032423047,0.00028209493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990483,0.00017291805,0.00027246773,0.00024419327,0.00017672061,0.00008543272],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062648,0.000069487585,0.00010314995,0.000039899725,0.0003322551,0.000030036597,0.00032365954,0.000028979472,0.0023700169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037186654,0.00004215302,0.00005145514,0.0007124469,0.00023927825,0.00026658707,0.0000491042,0.00016994707,0.00012862586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011818899,0.0007983956,0.09386637,0.000026474878,0.00011056025,0.0000024315734,0.7036328,0.00002143631,0.0004563723,0.03150567,0.16298465,0.006476695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082933315,0.000035262445,0.45542875,0.000014851966,0.000024225583,9.444753e-7,0.0018212172,0.000005015292,0.00015962719,0.00015489837,0.54222345,0.000048841608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004190636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0092785945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70181155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012967238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025342472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99854195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W987081371","doi":"","title":"L’ÉDUCATION ÉTHIQUE AU SEIN DU PROGRAMME QUÉBÉCOIS DE FORMATION : UNE ÉDUCATION TRANSVERSALE ? / ETHICS EDUCATION WITHIN THE QUÉBEC EDUCATION PROGRAM: A CROSS-CURRICULAR EDUCATION?","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2819742263207641,"score_gpt":0.4796161182771318,"score_spread":0.19764189195636772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W987081371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47957122,0.006038355,0.004902638,0.4086597,0.0421049,0.004279205,0.00006337312,0.0002355533,0.05414507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92550653,0.0016541103,0.035317913,0.015878579,0.005653446,0.0012184812,0.00021444028,0.00012952021,0.0144269625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885994,0.00368237,0.0033239508,0.0010100727,0.0016831188,0.0017010975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799696,0.0023634117,0.0053245663,0.00096484274,0.010082793,0.0012947838],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027563836,0.0008384042,0.0006613102,0.0017019485,0.00866038,0.001422199,0.0020341836,0.0010723672,0.00036048278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01521981,0.0008377565,0.00055886054,0.008199438,0.0032540748,0.008205384,0.0000776211,0.002981526,0.00013228848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013275578,0.0119232675,0.0052680993,0.0009559331,0.0001240873,0.0000015504002,0.28255668,0.0010060812,0.0004197454,0.3821639,0.021511788,0.29393607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034968316,0.00060208485,0.010966857,0.0012737302,0.00048139904,0.0014321178,0.2504686,0.0005414161,0.00078489335,0.033125725,0.6991606,0.000812914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29279387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23794597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6776488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03400845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21551067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W994092659","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Intellectual Property","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law; Property (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22748569818869813,"score_gpt":0.45181196536214685,"score_spread":0.22432626717344872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W994092659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021922296,0.00046949871,0.0000017263332,0.05843797,0.0011396522,0.00046290457,0.00003437182,0.00003959908,0.93919504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03317499,0.0013176741,0.00024462078,0.005705164,0.001117603,0.00010825953,0.00014856116,0.000030200787,0.95815295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968232,0.0008126155,0.00043609817,0.00039217033,0.00064075604,0.00089515356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754995,0.00083512283,0.00008526159,0.00032174593,0.0007994077,0.00040850815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037290133,0.00016708858,0.0002149271,0.0006742467,0.001157155,0.00064279645,0.000874416,0.00055951934,0.02311308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059480127,0.0001250665,0.000044612425,0.0014556372,0.0007824254,0.00060394645,0.00006577025,0.0017818334,0.001558193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021307517,0.00005394896,0.00014390654,0.000010503672,0.000008875014,0.0000022230931,0.033908017,4.4122604e-8,6.18047e-7,0.17390244,0.78987736,0.0020899165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000444663,0.000033261498,0.0000070370666,0.00005451751,0.00000480668,6.3081103e-7,0.035291377,0.0000012122593,0.000017168344,0.0013311744,0.96301675,0.00019761157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99915594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17313936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087929785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01353376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}