{"meta":{"query_hash":"38074cb16072","filters":{"topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations"},"cohort_total":2175,"direct_labels_cover":6,"predictions_cover":2175,"exported":2175,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/38074cb16072","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Legal+Education+and+Practice+Innovations"},"results":[{"id":"W1005736418","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511547348.018","title":"Definitions of Professionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.24684056149079855,"score_gpt":0.45679785578788,"score_spread":0.20995729429708146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1005736418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005042446,0.010478466,0.027121939,0.021863248,0.0014658703,0.000090658825,0.00014956895,0.000072650764,0.93371516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7577016,0.021428086,0.043700173,0.013771293,0.005604099,0.00109189,0.0006840841,0.0003189622,0.15569985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98452944,0.0079049645,0.0009515145,0.0015869999,0.003548692,0.0014785393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916848,0.0039470536,0.0008369921,0.00079011114,0.001526236,0.0012149035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073055266,0.00075799256,0.0005942559,0.0044080745,0.0055909483,0.011469203,0.0015751775,0.0037381754,0.009111703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012700589,0.00030198484,0.000664195,0.0040572523,0.026223356,0.009090392,0.006250188,0.006111359,0.0029937737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025835734,0.0000047565163,0.00008610882,0.00002535441,9.426075e-7,0.000015627924,0.0021979664,0.00002416872,0.000013548853,0.989687,0.0041111475,0.0038307924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007276873,0.000012216607,0.00036186757,0.00024023416,0.0000023977593,0.00025506568,0.0025271429,0.00018693869,0.000052139276,0.65563303,0.34071192,0.000009785848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002691635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002229952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011469203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075045265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063424995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05444938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W100704594","doi":"10.29173/alr340","title":"Regulating Lawyer Competence and Quality of Service","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alzheimer Society of Canada; Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Enforcement; Practice of law; Legal ethics; Legal practice; Law; Legal profession; Political science; Law enforcement; Legal education; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.16945317191154263,"score_gpt":0.4322030235899938,"score_spread":0.26274985167845116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W100704594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16732259,0.021790367,0.009253428,0.19318183,0.0006572275,0.00045431676,0.00013533088,0.00014221182,0.6070628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96701384,0.0034547294,0.0025552765,0.010253743,0.00027902695,0.00008377333,0.00004352068,0.000019658068,0.016296467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9631727,0.0095147975,0.0012783525,0.0017747794,0.015580845,0.008678549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9353034,0.025415888,0.009320762,0.0019508298,0.020421207,0.0075878366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019119743,0.00016993251,0.00039139818,0.0031918986,0.0055042705,0.010059209,0.002081857,0.0045994776,0.004421108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07072614,0.0003112048,0.00030513416,0.0020363969,0.0096114855,0.002174817,0.003354354,0.002745321,0.00032814723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050786013,0.00022012701,0.061484758,0.00065841584,0.00008958876,0.0004183947,0.0112208,0.0023193618,0.0020953887,0.6512304,0.05556394,0.21464819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013516053,0.00029494896,0.36954147,0.0026235317,0.00013184005,0.0006299987,0.01755046,0.0033875813,0.0025532572,0.12509368,0.4778475,0.00021052813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48161146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58780676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5183885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03787194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09387211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9576163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1011537451","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: Andrew Pineau's \"The abuses of argument: Understanding fallacies on Toulmin's layout of argument","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.06615253610836386,"score_gpt":0.2988894365209529,"score_spread":0.23273690041258904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1011537451","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013231467,0.00075267174,0.000092455746,0.985135,0.012102941,0.0000066594616,0.00002055265,0.000010132391,0.0017472977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034692155,0.0004212149,0.00010807671,0.9785901,0.011448034,0.00003945446,0.000008012434,0.000051686868,0.005864298],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799768,0.0071720933,0.0014475147,0.00322018,0.0054083797,0.0027749976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92408794,0.056862473,0.0035000471,0.0015040283,0.010650629,0.0033949933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020330312,0.0016541154,0.002835954,0.0027304606,0.02501325,0.013654145,0.0096352175,0.117836066,0.01065316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12691972,0.0018790003,0.002536549,0.0028924828,0.030680593,0.017478183,0.010504633,0.12548333,0.005234629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010971635,0.0000029944163,0.000024670127,0.00004621006,0.0000076252745,0.000093956005,0.0022683912,0.000017599077,0.000021018872,0.014262441,0.9825701,0.00067404384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039657065,0.000009995865,0.00021712578,0.0007269634,0.000037901533,0.0002031816,0.0062575326,0.0000991032,0.00017115758,0.024154978,0.9680131,0.00006928693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08991276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1481051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117836066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019102741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025379743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17877883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1013622494","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Copyright","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Intellectual property; Sociology","score_opus":0.1734231972596694,"score_gpt":0.4698197089103487,"score_spread":0.29639651165067926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1013622494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001937902,0.0078681605,0.002072327,0.035094503,0.0018485188,0.0012048887,0.08715969,0.0017750309,0.861039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0131187625,0.013795943,0.0077580465,0.0033597995,0.00035288438,0.0007763834,0.020087395,0.0010802587,0.93967056],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944523,0.00046806652,0.00040516705,0.00035564913,0.0034923921,0.00082637684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586594,0.006000209,0.000649781,0.0008687409,0.03049584,0.003326027],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006115662,0.0012640415,0.0011319789,0.019147817,0.013055158,0.016254334,0.002314168,0.003913048,0.3667557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0327624,0.0010033925,0.0006436825,0.03319282,0.0027108302,0.006501223,0.003003359,0.0025969455,0.07664696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009848438,0.000012492134,0.00023339527,0.00027970358,0.0000017491435,0.000012426783,0.000423588,0.000041606232,0.000034929133,0.0054088426,0.9626575,0.030883923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013124703,0.0000061853966,0.0026479908,0.00070765405,0.000009066497,0.000013037565,0.0018456501,0.00008582844,0.00012776272,0.0018545196,0.9926601,0.000029106097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.959956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98674405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3667557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07113101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25262356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90324616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W10239059","doi":"","title":"Obtaining Official Documents from Curtin University - Curtin University Sydney","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02580221090486229,"score_gpt":0.3097956573561564,"score_spread":0.2839934464512941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10239059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013277583,0.0028285773,0.002369918,0.03312305,0.006702097,0.0046124817,0.06066595,0.0017002916,0.87472004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011039914,0.001935468,0.0043053813,0.0018300873,0.0002972839,0.0011403861,0.009711478,0.000712062,0.969028],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841149,0.0010984285,0.0015296518,0.0010815082,0.010129235,0.0020461858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92321503,0.007863537,0.001801377,0.0076328516,0.054481838,0.005005369],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010759883,0.00092708506,0.0015981947,0.0076762484,0.0059306165,0.0074997866,0.0017072195,0.0023354082,0.34706157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06657206,0.0010175612,0.0010072988,0.0064021344,0.0019693465,0.0022080063,0.00474158,0.003410548,0.17981014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008735684,0.000068800095,0.0012305652,0.0004615328,0.0000131409,0.00021089643,0.0011993373,0.00005590262,0.0009944658,0.008594806,0.93668586,0.05039746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002148923,0.000019854717,0.007543311,0.00037964073,0.000009103565,0.00007657031,0.000688105,0.000080052836,0.000966961,0.0005063624,0.9896904,0.000018222529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16888964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31562814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6529384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011114999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080895856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9313374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1029958129","doi":"10.2753/pin1099-9922120203","title":"The Road to Disclosure Legislation in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba; Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil servants; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Safeguard; Public administration; Law; Political science; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.03947168854435506,"score_gpt":0.35063238943038094,"score_spread":0.3111607008860259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1029958129","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021651816,0.027638866,0.0025734673,0.81381226,0.0031364004,0.00018844892,0.00046895986,0.00021183174,0.13031797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39536843,0.04404253,0.011963409,0.40732503,0.0023810342,0.00024235308,0.0008165575,0.00024212866,0.13761863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96169835,0.0037401542,0.0015198154,0.0022922903,0.021259401,0.009490095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9351471,0.013951135,0.0025239782,0.001598649,0.034833428,0.011945762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022351008,0.0006394973,0.0009969505,0.003680519,0.030043315,0.019028768,0.00504176,0.016520195,0.009475844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054069072,0.00124227,0.0015977435,0.004481308,0.015149591,0.006172779,0.007857996,0.019336715,0.0008868103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006289812,0.00013131517,0.0045325514,0.0003349241,0.000039535953,0.000541381,0.009974148,0.0012842088,0.0005235004,0.6295659,0.28950202,0.063507505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083601815,0.000053909844,0.012202941,0.0013545561,0.000060198447,0.000134054,0.0053491336,0.0011835133,0.0005755425,0.035879605,0.9429181,0.0002047931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99622923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99519265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.660441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.33955902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.60982823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7660179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1035098506","doi":"","title":"Troubling Feelings: Moral Anger and Clinical Legal Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Anger; Social psychology; Legal education; Psychology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.04477521796272497,"score_gpt":0.3829250215082699,"score_spread":0.3381498035455449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1035098506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6593587,0.006929962,0.009054204,0.13241705,0.0012309791,0.000087173714,0.000023997685,0.000105983774,0.190792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98624915,0.001073934,0.0006863889,0.00798389,0.00012760184,0.000035104273,0.0000060969387,0.00001589809,0.0038219988],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924664,0.005668376,0.00015579505,0.000286036,0.0007874753,0.00063582713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99538594,0.0022011783,0.0011411969,0.00015274892,0.00033961723,0.00077943003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035736593,0.0002872509,0.00028604406,0.0005830884,0.0050102226,0.0063806735,0.0004900355,0.002602502,0.0041580973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113148205,0.00018756263,0.0002590382,0.00024125373,0.017751874,0.0038858606,0.0066173016,0.005900059,0.0004383267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007341248,0.00045453684,0.017397022,0.0003161113,0.000029096642,0.0013515409,0.7594618,0.00023142103,0.001861622,0.13623425,0.015445532,0.0671437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005317346,0.00016607558,0.020565404,0.00074099685,0.00003565168,0.0033479938,0.7779236,0.0007485916,0.001324469,0.063498914,0.13150857,0.00008660818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014540199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022875464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063806735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027462558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002821707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019925535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1058365201","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1028","title":"The Critical Characteristics of Community Legal Aid Clinics in Ontario","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.0912782148151113,"score_gpt":0.45576877241492225,"score_spread":0.36449055759981097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1058365201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722819,0.0009470694,0.00018841954,0.004452349,0.00006403643,0.00021998392,0.0017682099,0.000026956115,0.020051247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558806,0.0004035634,0.00012276892,0.00035400788,0.000030264697,0.00007944774,0.0003124821,0.000008664856,0.0031007102],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475574,0.0005708384,0.00024633165,0.0003884245,0.001608513,0.002430242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98030317,0.0018918618,0.006413094,0.0003615364,0.0040450557,0.0069853016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013173819,0.00021445073,0.00030713342,0.0019889572,0.0070353937,0.0031403254,0.0015657777,0.0008020691,0.008512869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013099048,0.00042968683,0.00026498688,0.0046902047,0.0024825719,0.00068574026,0.002331341,0.00081732473,0.00033891626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017342459,0.000113597715,0.9419775,0.00019492256,0.000045485325,0.0006512077,0.020184666,0.00030663196,0.00054022245,0.003376743,0.009876321,0.02255932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016349404,0.00005227565,0.96854335,0.0000930346,0.000012680288,0.00022716496,0.018456595,0.00020735132,0.00006590287,0.00017657712,0.012128342,0.000020426389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93350506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97771615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06649494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043505635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07224845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31565696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106139605","doi":"","title":"Peer Review and Legal Publishing: What Law Librarians Need to Know about Open, Single-Blind, and Double-Blind Reviewing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Double blind; Selection (genetic algorithm); Peer review; Single blind; Legal research; Political science; Open peer review; Law; Legal writing; Public relations; Computer science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.09058961384895464,"score_gpt":0.39112982641823363,"score_spread":0.300540212569279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W106139605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010077877,0.16700901,0.008043279,0.7860604,0.015992394,0.00008633512,0.000034222372,0.00030662332,0.021459956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05540514,0.5226905,0.042608175,0.23369277,0.09906861,0.00039315072,0.00018694685,0.0009975003,0.044957247],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.87288505,0.065945305,0.008809661,0.004478279,0.04512835,0.0027533078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5888801,0.22987214,0.022904938,0.028982194,0.1072624,0.022098182],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.079391085,0.0009376616,0.0023504528,0.0062685087,0.01008571,0.037260704,0.0034221185,0.01741021,0.01617525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2550845,0.0011348433,0.001211794,0.0072634793,0.033086833,0.07530811,0.007848359,0.016695416,0.011038749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078548124,0.00017218511,0.0018804721,0.004285708,0.00006156406,0.00023162176,0.006396603,0.00016582964,0.00042307356,0.072808884,0.52836514,0.38513044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003766492,0.000121024976,0.0024697634,0.0065475265,0.00004039234,0.0011429838,0.00572474,0.0002810348,0.00049038266,0.09985324,0.8831061,0.00018517465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073310155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011655966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92060894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073475516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023920756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4198652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1115536093","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1029","title":"A Response to \"The Critical Characteristics of Community Legal Aid Clinics in Ontario\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.09211197741561815,"score_gpt":0.46165063457544253,"score_spread":0.36953865715982437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1115536093","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06659186,0.0017596508,0.000090720096,0.920574,0.0018607341,0.00008513331,0.0004231654,0.000022654363,0.008592229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5104979,0.005382486,0.00031197016,0.44235554,0.0034956315,0.00035605486,0.00032336137,0.0000835568,0.037193414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938525,0.00093188504,0.00032834822,0.0005151005,0.0022188632,0.0021533736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96720916,0.009457051,0.0054081054,0.00043106588,0.0065601543,0.010934477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004943933,0.00031705384,0.00038147933,0.00089993456,0.020071762,0.0045854896,0.002825516,0.010657613,0.0097638285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026427735,0.0008734197,0.00037037831,0.0026611052,0.0065249843,0.0021813791,0.003607017,0.0059623457,0.00049695524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017819728,0.00008348602,0.06459219,0.0007324213,0.000031715957,0.0031374167,0.11270539,0.00015277443,0.0010472606,0.0075416723,0.7837651,0.026032401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009967825,0.00013224,0.24974494,0.0010730468,0.000041420248,0.00070920616,0.18860982,0.00029127824,0.0002826162,0.0010508335,0.55777246,0.00019249119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9144695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97379994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08553052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07821842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11581991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56751704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1122857891","doi":"","title":"Research guides: Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Media reports","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12672183141219528,"score_gpt":0.4546053300598281,"score_spread":0.32788349864763283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1122857891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013106344,0.02304333,0.0076756435,0.025576264,0.0033117349,0.003058696,0.17766654,0.003115489,0.75524163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009720332,0.032146826,0.027004853,0.0049103913,0.00066336984,0.0036469277,0.0659426,0.0022782637,0.8536865],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879171,0.0014987936,0.0008149515,0.00042573232,0.00852547,0.0008178575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643395,0.006348805,0.0011519336,0.0012618409,0.025557434,0.0013406056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011152466,0.0013087235,0.00089474866,0.019849228,0.0070079193,0.008898859,0.0033181673,0.0026160134,0.10637658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029713254,0.0014631671,0.00049444556,0.02655047,0.0032063366,0.006176656,0.0022650752,0.003337486,0.055294633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007713338,0.000009181059,0.00013127057,0.00022870055,0.0000011190366,0.000015752745,0.00062151666,0.00003403995,0.00007826557,0.0072507425,0.9590032,0.032618538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034444822,0.0000031069228,0.0009144949,0.00036604257,0.000002463074,0.000010781766,0.00079179136,0.000021764215,0.000120661476,0.0009891569,0.99675936,0.000016943539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83644396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9060198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16355604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031540256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11579532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35586512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1134036274","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Criminal Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science","score_opus":0.2209897964199036,"score_gpt":0.4732451683537597,"score_spread":0.25225537193385605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1134036274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038799625,0.009775997,0.0039406987,0.060217425,0.0025640659,0.0040528015,0.18571225,0.0031597435,0.7266971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02071722,0.017440535,0.023642316,0.0076317927,0.00053413445,0.0032601077,0.044366863,0.0017045357,0.88070244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949957,0.00051732274,0.00049534533,0.00033937744,0.0028918146,0.0007604246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94706476,0.0065868087,0.00090564345,0.00071572297,0.04010208,0.0046249987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007175642,0.0011977912,0.0010072687,0.016899394,0.0102964705,0.012171272,0.002408686,0.0033503454,0.25347993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03362029,0.0010348452,0.0006927549,0.027438946,0.002058063,0.0054973895,0.0028119509,0.0024692642,0.056177735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011576485,0.000016762728,0.0003773168,0.0004082025,0.000001867306,0.000012916066,0.00053423963,0.000043351396,0.00004625046,0.0024384928,0.9656743,0.030434651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033476437,0.00001226246,0.005995576,0.001046995,0.000016031654,0.000018827424,0.003082212,0.000113961345,0.0001970518,0.0016335617,0.98780847,0.00004148028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9484449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98487353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25347993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056905165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25986165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84797484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114302304","doi":"","title":"Conflicts of Interest in Canada: The McKercher Decision","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Flexibility (engineering); Legal ethics; Conflict of interest; Court decision; Conflict of laws; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.07175265176882184,"score_gpt":0.35143825932774336,"score_spread":0.2796856075589215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114302304","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008749642,0.007332535,0.0010720209,0.8439259,0.0018650368,0.000066701854,0.00025162264,0.000034500536,0.13670209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20355842,0.005602436,0.0027171783,0.7243112,0.0014335512,0.000101269135,0.00015133286,0.00007142822,0.062053245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771036,0.0029304312,0.0010112296,0.0022973802,0.010963194,0.005694187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97469115,0.0095098335,0.0008909265,0.00064242946,0.008531075,0.0057345787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011887865,0.00060112367,0.00065077405,0.0014703191,0.027859489,0.013240511,0.0037349106,0.026088113,0.006088847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039430905,0.00092054333,0.0009939929,0.0019838088,0.0119777275,0.0045698364,0.0047245827,0.025774194,0.00095509423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031468157,0.00002773995,0.0021347797,0.00008083977,0.000033943837,0.0013232848,0.0051293643,0.00033402522,0.00033341875,0.535461,0.43330935,0.021800768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075659445,0.00003406257,0.0047547356,0.0009217032,0.00011493859,0.00065651466,0.006315552,0.00088430365,0.00061308156,0.07065263,0.9146846,0.0002921967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96670634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98341167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09776748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09776748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28226095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70935607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W115413550","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511558696.019","title":"The condition of India (cont.): lawyers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.04998935388273615,"score_gpt":0.27731441246157884,"score_spread":0.2273250585788427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W115413550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003308105,0.13445622,0.0006958125,0.052481133,0.010747817,0.0000661299,0.0006911704,0.00039633014,0.7971573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032402314,0.030630277,0.0004792553,0.021262044,0.002537658,0.000060070626,0.00036480988,0.00016779445,0.9120958],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997985,0.000028570274,0.000009043573,0.000026024498,0.000090362584,0.000047551886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998367,0.00005653733,0.000014463723,0.000011748186,0.000050498093,0.000030051813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015640518,0.00043039542,0.00024127949,0.000937621,0.0024674828,0.0023905982,0.0006016031,0.002031368,0.06397176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006628756,0.00027207367,0.00027128728,0.0014528303,0.00078107865,0.0020506547,0.0013715279,0.0026430553,0.021682834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007225254,0.000013394707,0.00016966708,0.00011227397,0.000001574164,0.0001591997,0.0013438947,0.000040527284,0.00012157807,0.011747257,0.94763714,0.038646363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016041739,0.000006214982,0.00093445665,0.00020185832,0.0000024685423,0.00026854128,0.000851708,0.000019631794,0.000075450895,0.0016173843,0.9960156,0.000005014892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024776645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07894648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06397176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017663934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018245269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21400684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1161908381","doi":"","title":"A Look at the Development of Legal Education in Ontario through the Eyes of Six Lawyers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal education; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05141653529888249,"score_gpt":0.350541611960265,"score_spread":0.29912507666138255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1161908381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14774701,0.0055853305,0.0007653228,0.617053,0.0016274108,0.0002219094,0.00019868206,0.000112174996,0.22668919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70687443,0.0059495526,0.0016145008,0.04829651,0.00031815367,0.00013085298,0.00012060306,0.00013934288,0.23655607],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98846275,0.002233413,0.00021312626,0.00046621432,0.0028994114,0.005725007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799169,0.0019845576,0.0010433013,0.00031879797,0.0041055256,0.0126310475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004623881,0.00026483435,0.0003289789,0.0013517399,0.071333416,0.010366308,0.002838489,0.006604081,0.011985693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012143611,0.00060315005,0.0005074532,0.002854241,0.017184824,0.0031622655,0.008805135,0.010484776,0.00075009343],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012409707,0.00021847614,0.019048467,0.0003421682,0.000027635244,0.0054219896,0.60916847,0.00029077998,0.0013617503,0.10013396,0.20264669,0.061215404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024048697,0.000044572098,0.021041064,0.00017638614,0.000008648891,0.00022938882,0.25061914,0.00009564765,0.00020816055,0.0025133514,0.7249921,0.00004744766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98066413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80186015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19813985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31399313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9300441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W118711946","doi":"10.14264/131304","title":"Challenges for Australian Tribunals; Towards Aretaic Practice Principles","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The University of Queensland","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Normative; Law; Sociology; Public relations","score_opus":0.14664632380400333,"score_gpt":0.4174058832373463,"score_spread":0.27075955943334296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118711946","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04383394,0.014908602,0.02620062,0.58547866,0.0033740725,0.00044424646,0.00004721721,0.00010894247,0.32560378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77048403,0.0099255005,0.03369978,0.07033187,0.0011730021,0.0007751821,0.00006301606,0.00010240423,0.11344521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9569531,0.023759766,0.00214747,0.0022658398,0.010557015,0.004316757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733994,0.009702226,0.0019350521,0.0019249253,0.008376586,0.0046618637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03471466,0.00050868234,0.00068009726,0.002155247,0.024359126,0.029581072,0.0047309324,0.016102655,0.0052339607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03188617,0.00076664885,0.000862891,0.0023641526,0.035454847,0.009260731,0.01572312,0.01702403,0.0014678234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008791263,0.00008495715,0.0010773583,0.00041424859,0.000008366854,0.00060727407,0.11507779,0.0003233914,0.00037345412,0.83033955,0.022726059,0.028958777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010618123,0.00008212075,0.0029515864,0.0016099593,0.000014547439,0.00061953603,0.09938741,0.0009913016,0.00021345505,0.23661005,0.6574557,0.00005363453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05433468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05743251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05433468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022467671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0746777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18359083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1192759474","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Civil Procedure","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14542644269188043,"score_gpt":0.4478559072640235,"score_spread":0.3024294645721431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1192759474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032343853,0.0086799385,0.0029872821,0.046250097,0.0018758922,0.002732006,0.18561389,0.0022162946,0.7464102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021636913,0.017120967,0.017812239,0.0065852846,0.00048998574,0.002473195,0.045588415,0.0013897188,0.8869033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947299,0.0005451233,0.00047588008,0.00033886297,0.0031582506,0.00075200154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9512219,0.007525006,0.0008580559,0.0007890347,0.036136962,0.003469006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069519547,0.001124812,0.00096080406,0.01585997,0.010538071,0.0116082495,0.002336576,0.003440183,0.2665004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03423481,0.0010021729,0.0006194143,0.027655086,0.002140401,0.005462483,0.0024617538,0.0024739385,0.05089791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117807995,0.000014917216,0.0002989527,0.00035773913,0.0000016877735,0.0000108224085,0.0004858906,0.000041877163,0.000037789843,0.0035515479,0.96862215,0.026564844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027788283,0.000010313208,0.005680797,0.0009550224,0.000013682341,0.000014834658,0.0026995714,0.00010452133,0.00018069932,0.001811134,0.98846394,0.000037739766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9577572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9870892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2665004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061978314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24807194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8915327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W121275545","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001437","title":"Teaching “Human Rights in Africa” Transnationally: Reflections on the Jos-Osgoode Virtual Classroom Experience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Institution; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Plateau (mathematics); Sociology","score_opus":0.08648714055631132,"score_gpt":0.4336545503878741,"score_spread":0.3471674098315628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W121275545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8398715,0.0024260061,0.0027006906,0.030673763,0.0016770137,0.00013858473,0.00003099057,0.00007574165,0.12240568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9544066,0.0015708295,0.0013229969,0.003942751,0.00015617975,0.00011213485,0.000015499754,0.00008663622,0.03838625],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946938,0.0036246593,0.00007879638,0.00025452135,0.0002980638,0.0010500085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536926,0.0023235553,0.00018614875,0.00014666306,0.00016274923,0.0018114852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075440137,0.0006649322,0.0006219148,0.0008775878,0.029542256,0.011643661,0.0014391067,0.0036084242,0.009500568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007302194,0.0005792196,0.00036875973,0.0006518899,0.0152422935,0.007903403,0.013490058,0.008534428,0.00088780455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045946403,0.00035632798,0.0011743465,0.00008817196,0.0000038812796,0.0022682615,0.9606028,0.000066204855,0.00080755923,0.016487703,0.006456572,0.01164223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016472977,0.00011017814,0.0008053191,0.00019030123,0.0000043539617,0.0006278078,0.87190026,0.00006679106,0.00035959075,0.0015294504,0.124373175,0.000016335605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004905762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029542256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029478061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035299067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039897025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W123047629","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-5294-8_5","title":"Realizing Moral Purpose","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16362631791454715,"score_gpt":0.3990102563049537,"score_spread":0.23538393839040653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W123047629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006378388,0.0009144163,0.003506172,0.0042345678,0.00029516508,0.0000137724555,0.00000888496,0.000021519587,0.99036765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.076683566,0.0015595013,0.0033534435,0.005421389,0.00038574863,0.00010507942,0.000037664624,0.00012558298,0.9123281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987135,0.00059186056,0.000028793487,0.00015565997,0.0003538751,0.00015634164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994777,0.00024752502,0.000021635757,0.00009021521,0.000107308486,0.00005552086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016161066,0.00068542955,0.00038020607,0.0007906627,0.0044832164,0.007321794,0.0009359341,0.004637305,0.023655614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021658537,0.000293972,0.00035255085,0.00043308642,0.015331997,0.007545884,0.0034819564,0.0077635474,0.0066469978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012339419,0.000005116816,0.000011438667,0.000008889925,5.039137e-7,0.000012104672,0.00096884585,0.000033518438,0.000026369937,0.9795567,0.013663067,0.0057121497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033534898,0.000004335279,0.00006113645,0.00011350613,0.000002158539,0.00004708359,0.0012549548,0.00014129408,0.00016003297,0.55619746,0.4420088,0.000005959991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004737405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011898708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023655614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047866846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041593933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079135954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W123139672","doi":"10.29173/alr45","title":"Qualitative Research on Legal Education: Studying Outstanding Law Teachers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Legal research; Sociology; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Law; Legal education; Data collection; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.3452753466288712,"score_gpt":0.6086062936886351,"score_spread":0.26333094705976384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W123139672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9100432,0.008527233,0.020666342,0.025130527,0.0004565282,0.0013544485,0.00020132773,0.00005833314,0.03356209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776844,0.004411471,0.007608718,0.0031272261,0.000056865323,0.0009507872,0.00006111741,0.000031900807,0.006067578],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96592474,0.02924183,0.0005417783,0.00083825877,0.0020775544,0.0013758827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93727875,0.05265781,0.0025881312,0.0015249869,0.003040334,0.0029099877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03269341,0.00030225213,0.00076969404,0.0019007373,0.009628008,0.0054178964,0.002172705,0.0016083843,0.0020692232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048058808,0.00064627815,0.00027772522,0.0025263617,0.014163755,0.004837982,0.0059333555,0.003167948,0.00035991537],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000138859505,0.00009662892,0.003963193,0.00031692983,0.0000051802467,0.00031582403,0.97345585,0.000060123813,0.0004653802,0.008690592,0.0014380685,0.011178194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009745126,0.000053368363,0.001419339,0.00044732945,0.0000045901247,0.00024387875,0.977544,0.000056828532,0.0002706496,0.001655524,0.018287007,0.000007769477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01144085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02298093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03269341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006786476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012437593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17290127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1244090291","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Law: Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.045723278725115085,"score_gpt":0.3357348860507691,"score_spread":0.290011607325654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1244090291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022938112,0.0028085457,0.0007741479,0.0073356396,0.000508844,0.00034025416,0.03532613,0.0023032906,0.94830936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002107943,0.0007051069,0.0004402308,0.00046952686,0.000022612663,0.00004142661,0.0022120653,0.00025277602,0.9937483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987437,0.000062697974,0.00005819694,0.000097429474,0.00080033287,0.00023767176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932433,0.0007256414,0.00014402483,0.00020881038,0.0048600663,0.0008181099],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011210152,0.00088312454,0.0009475658,0.003934921,0.010080422,0.009736371,0.0020593393,0.00414585,0.4725888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006620321,0.0011924737,0.00043467173,0.011113604,0.0016736119,0.002412452,0.0014592932,0.0023376534,0.14318283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009260433,0.000019626075,0.00026867408,0.00007291624,0.0000012563855,0.000025758018,0.0001798732,0.00010034937,0.0000330399,0.0034216687,0.97224593,0.023621596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000991426,0.000004689672,0.0018814167,0.00011372995,0.0000031823158,0.000014626303,0.00039944812,0.0001318488,0.000092029586,0.0005194282,0.9968136,0.000015988622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97511953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4725888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044675265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14201766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75228804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W125614389","doi":"","title":"A declaration of ethics for presiding officers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Declaration; Business ethics; Summit; Applied ethics; Information ethics; Law; Parliament; Government (linguistics); Political science; Ethics of technology; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Normative ethics; Public relations; Public administration; Meta-ethics; Politics","score_opus":0.434021735768999,"score_gpt":0.44338848057230584,"score_spread":0.009366744803306848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W125614389","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064701317,0.01606066,0.054614753,0.4722869,0.05761052,0.004456173,0.0019598003,0.0008308222,0.38571027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09758386,0.0116584115,0.11378935,0.30260077,0.011159874,0.005663379,0.0028309375,0.0004779244,0.45423546],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9093159,0.03013087,0.011094834,0.004028549,0.03543052,0.009999393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8908639,0.041740548,0.0071589947,0.013925887,0.03528564,0.011025045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06085455,0.0019664406,0.0025684494,0.001761681,0.009733162,0.013033991,0.006647568,0.032887716,0.006660146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10969665,0.0023113328,0.0015787759,0.0028320544,0.017121455,0.0051669953,0.0051317494,0.035829347,0.0077105514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006290698,0.00007853382,0.00049702544,0.0005895831,0.00003466243,0.0008512008,0.006488984,0.00035115014,0.0014944625,0.30309117,0.6405822,0.045878045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021901287,0.000023221512,0.00052885374,0.00095097127,0.000013449543,0.0002882069,0.0014260672,0.00018491104,0.0002786062,0.010094372,0.98613596,0.000053434316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1411962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25382546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02003845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19690065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3218335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W125632841","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2439526","title":"Access to Justice: A Critique of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada's Inventory of Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Legal service","score_opus":0.024117503425832684,"score_gpt":0.3497024901199302,"score_spread":0.3255849866940975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W125632841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0544488,0.014672948,0.0058520446,0.69408685,0.0025881792,0.00044528794,0.0028399655,0.0001545028,0.22491151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79164046,0.006374865,0.0070949937,0.16587864,0.0017971222,0.0005060411,0.00056113466,0.00024338305,0.025903367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9618028,0.005279769,0.0018702284,0.0036715923,0.017310483,0.010065086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9198188,0.02582627,0.0037238752,0.002374072,0.03629496,0.011961979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022419307,0.0013772406,0.0024167371,0.012728039,0.04240487,0.026094912,0.0078112604,0.015605242,0.004219068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067172945,0.0014472874,0.0017312479,0.02168044,0.047481503,0.010536835,0.008931001,0.022365965,0.00028222235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037509886,0.000034487246,0.0030874044,0.00016389333,0.000055154364,0.000084708336,0.024097204,0.0005920259,0.000056358105,0.8563775,0.1022148,0.013198929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017164444,0.000076068325,0.04588024,0.0035061727,0.000397958,0.00018580351,0.058622435,0.003960647,0.00047666603,0.22935185,0.65675896,0.0006115609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99483454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99613035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75431997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24568003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45300284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8749043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W127097073","doi":"","title":"Killing Ourselves: Depression as an Institutional, Workplace and Professionalism Problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Depression (economics); Institution; Liberian dollar; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Business; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.18715339064534545,"score_gpt":0.42972257967568633,"score_spread":0.2425691890303409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W127097073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6453212,0.008680234,0.0023819534,0.29347754,0.0005380977,0.000037570768,0.000025046846,0.00003334505,0.049505048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98287785,0.0022592295,0.0004436047,0.010993493,0.0002244001,0.00001596874,0.000007712558,0.000005655029,0.0031721266],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979665,0.0010424969,0.00008124713,0.00014090718,0.00034827,0.00042066388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980268,0.00068016123,0.0004748422,0.00010341043,0.00020803457,0.00050669175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016451065,0.00014919329,0.00027303514,0.0006458311,0.004584963,0.003183606,0.0006694679,0.0033569774,0.001471671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003968455,0.00017630651,0.0002049594,0.0006009117,0.011117661,0.003200954,0.0030046287,0.0042232997,0.00020299935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008330814,0.0008694263,0.09394765,0.0002478919,0.000058810907,0.015472263,0.3631185,0.0003000508,0.002894003,0.25541753,0.05278985,0.21480082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008551415,0.00039956314,0.07531596,0.0005283169,0.00003756816,0.034897543,0.63490945,0.0012461136,0.0008787862,0.14176914,0.109852605,0.000079353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004949035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008421789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004949035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024417718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00256539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017716408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134638635","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6091-731-8_3","title":"Practitioner Reflection and Judgement as Phronesis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Phronesis; Techne; Episteme; Judgement; Practical wisdom; Epistemology; Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05819840387454809,"score_gpt":0.3518616629084635,"score_spread":0.2936632590339154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134638635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011426779,0.007163084,0.11656443,0.030842312,0.0017331953,0.00015561449,0.0000311375,0.00022097921,0.83186245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81108063,0.0061675156,0.04951123,0.0056001768,0.001192736,0.00037180053,0.00007041885,0.00036602863,0.12563945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9511042,0.03330781,0.0015604994,0.0032425395,0.0091861,0.001598894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96690404,0.023277795,0.0013680891,0.004703926,0.0029884279,0.00075768406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030886848,0.00081280526,0.0008715259,0.0030082504,0.0057109576,0.016598282,0.0023573742,0.0060132355,0.0046756444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050592046,0.0006561417,0.00074478734,0.002494241,0.06803242,0.021045107,0.010970473,0.009860427,0.0016094943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007198032,0.000008017283,0.000053110733,0.00005328749,0.0000037995912,0.00006211992,0.031200571,0.00012454609,0.00012308816,0.95537454,0.0026215944,0.010368226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012545996,0.000015585301,0.00007836695,0.00029170664,0.0000050089334,0.00012939886,0.008175379,0.00045345217,0.00034139527,0.88642675,0.10404963,0.000020835458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026484078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024539814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030886848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007615215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071862754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16334718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134984923","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1197","title":"Transformative Social Work in the Criminal Justice Field","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Conviction; Criminal justice; Work (physics); Criminology; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Social work; Political science; Law; Social justice; Public relations; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.07027117737201392,"score_gpt":0.4345513415156712,"score_spread":0.36428016414365727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134984923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20209616,0.0074241785,0.014802997,0.22911833,0.0030278764,0.0005490692,0.000040169303,0.00017347075,0.5427677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466223,0.0021490187,0.0034693927,0.013434046,0.00045639765,0.00016856095,0.000031567088,0.00006797435,0.033600856],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98851365,0.0070114587,0.0001566316,0.0004089506,0.001296305,0.0026129305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355775,0.0026205906,0.0006456543,0.00036529126,0.0006454812,0.0021651967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008204539,0.00053046783,0.0003827636,0.0033735875,0.03160061,0.009716227,0.002230475,0.0049011176,0.0056319153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062192767,0.00034026644,0.0007035899,0.0019329756,0.07325005,0.005044799,0.014474785,0.007485213,0.00059168553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001641093,0.00025805942,0.0022340415,0.00012594949,0.000007148813,0.0016392841,0.6255596,0.00024135494,0.00055108883,0.30404037,0.021178083,0.044148684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015676236,0.00009849474,0.004442551,0.00048509624,0.0000072012235,0.0016816799,0.60721385,0.00037888912,0.00040348002,0.08087801,0.30434784,0.000047301764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033608943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07413676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033608943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015505765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03057433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112502694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W135727461","doi":"","title":"Founding Legal Education in America","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal education; Political science; Legal ethics","score_opus":0.015239008100383845,"score_gpt":0.29145446231529853,"score_spread":0.27621545421491467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W135727461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019424047,0.040702503,0.00036914682,0.28520474,0.0051478473,0.000051421237,0.00016953958,0.000101772406,0.6488289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23538601,0.024762433,0.0013310403,0.09603486,0.0029746848,0.00011060235,0.00023276225,0.00008171149,0.63908595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838614,0.00025284025,0.000039007155,0.00026451604,0.0003400832,0.0007174681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964479,0.0005823566,0.00018128507,0.00010022097,0.00051333185,0.0021749688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002015655,0.0002807597,0.00032478772,0.0015026669,0.017851831,0.005373432,0.00084367156,0.00392771,0.045223117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036392063,0.00024207054,0.00023495767,0.0012010381,0.0067521622,0.003899943,0.0055463314,0.00869552,0.00264257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001605938,0.00033514434,0.0030732115,0.00016036785,0.000004606899,0.00058622536,0.016182551,0.00006414466,0.00027708337,0.3439637,0.51250446,0.12283237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032564985,0.000008510123,0.0014131906,0.00020884348,0.0000012435329,0.00005152411,0.0017701486,0.000015352398,0.000027769422,0.0056470376,0.99084985,0.000003365563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091827616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2652331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091827616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01811282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035492375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18258625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1450639465","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Privacy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Information privacy; Privacy law; Political science; Law; Computer science; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.20632104151090797,"score_gpt":0.4759595585280398,"score_spread":0.2696385170171318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1450639465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030717559,0.007704658,0.0041622533,0.07129418,0.0019592063,0.0021188539,0.08359787,0.0024668158,0.8236243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018957086,0.010966169,0.014568505,0.0074713733,0.0004027898,0.0013778689,0.016781742,0.0013032989,0.9281712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947849,0.00066309836,0.00043400962,0.00034995287,0.002980769,0.0007872709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95926833,0.008250283,0.00068977056,0.00081787474,0.027230693,0.0037429521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007927622,0.0010020732,0.0008472569,0.012262811,0.012554498,0.014129811,0.0022186148,0.0048047295,0.24488926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03427243,0.0010250165,0.0005703611,0.020577,0.0029520486,0.0061157313,0.0028986905,0.003150765,0.048602477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010947695,0.000012482562,0.00025474542,0.0002116959,0.0000014015201,0.000015074687,0.00076381036,0.000045617446,0.000044594515,0.0062411865,0.96934223,0.023056094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019643805,0.000007737351,0.0026250568,0.00058808824,0.000008788176,0.000016392223,0.002963228,0.000105239254,0.00016033517,0.0024190305,0.99105096,0.000035526904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95031047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98376495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24488926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06524993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24574512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81923616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1451039275","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511807039.006","title":"DIALOGUES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.06747266759287196,"score_gpt":0.2835512738676674,"score_spread":0.21607860627479542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1451039275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037608806,0.0039160578,0.05342179,0.006323094,0.0015300341,0.000502726,0.00072267215,0.0008939287,0.9289288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20527889,0.0050744815,0.05597693,0.004555078,0.0010504592,0.0014175216,0.002429332,0.0011918296,0.7230254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99082947,0.00535412,0.00048742752,0.0013353482,0.0013859271,0.00060756865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99585694,0.0021536234,0.00020254674,0.00070812966,0.00069405977,0.00038480628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035840487,0.0011740951,0.00067703903,0.0018744853,0.0060112746,0.009057083,0.0017554348,0.0033159133,0.08491792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011269878,0.0005293223,0.0007061438,0.0017288958,0.0055450164,0.011880435,0.008569626,0.003148693,0.023588974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005003878,0.00003544141,0.00014569846,0.00020192841,0.000008203338,0.00018692359,0.01486473,0.00022266207,0.0005175943,0.87704307,0.05863979,0.048083924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006411947,0.000010840627,0.00006908156,0.00013099378,0.000002734199,0.00014564549,0.002388892,0.00023933889,0.00019757054,0.09289551,0.9039025,0.000010551228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001737399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014171002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08491792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046575586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023855395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1464615643","doi":"","title":"The Forms and Limits of Judicial Inquiry: Judges as Inquiry Commissioners in Canada and Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Adjudication; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Sociology; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.06208624747103884,"score_gpt":0.3661541928609082,"score_spread":0.30406794538986937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1464615643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7522231,0.011101327,0.0020652956,0.10576686,0.00036732183,0.0002628773,0.00009697397,0.000028882672,0.12808749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98145056,0.0022186777,0.0007356906,0.0021373618,0.000039085742,0.000051915176,0.000020139292,0.00001535535,0.013331257],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96457946,0.011296352,0.0013558434,0.0021277426,0.012390323,0.008250405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94713855,0.020470807,0.0045999964,0.00082711113,0.014885566,0.012078048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014529002,0.00021969348,0.00067914254,0.003065143,0.032233093,0.02112589,0.0024819507,0.0042109005,0.0025281082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06823204,0.0007630501,0.00027015185,0.004559415,0.026920136,0.0047595887,0.009061025,0.0066589573,0.00023576934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001724716,0.0001241135,0.043081664,0.00028444646,0.000025098085,0.0019676993,0.49455795,0.0014702545,0.0007660979,0.34753025,0.026762318,0.08325759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007419432,0.00008526474,0.1674233,0.0013273031,0.00006622098,0.0005753969,0.53626114,0.004467538,0.00061125326,0.04802722,0.24071947,0.000361691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9820117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13662428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13662428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22693631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1465600500","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16292792948157803,"score_gpt":0.4828933617618431,"score_spread":0.3199654322802651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1465600500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027112511,0.010125638,0.003253188,0.055944826,0.002622925,0.0023389726,0.16365406,0.0028259915,0.7565232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014759934,0.014333616,0.01446215,0.00597318,0.00045765322,0.0017296245,0.034398727,0.0014198009,0.9124654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948152,0.0004831692,0.0005084476,0.00034051153,0.0030931144,0.00075957854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9544225,0.0066733835,0.0008344499,0.00076790946,0.033533312,0.003768438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069419215,0.001208624,0.0010479016,0.016269019,0.010339837,0.013401276,0.0024551724,0.004021502,0.28289944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03285031,0.0010894996,0.0006558935,0.027725855,0.0022264004,0.0055416306,0.0026893292,0.0025780199,0.05972588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010463895,0.000012496917,0.00024033264,0.00028549027,0.0000014619569,0.00001068867,0.00035358447,0.000040215586,0.000034976678,0.0030855043,0.9713496,0.024575105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022862394,0.0000080198015,0.003712733,0.0007584778,0.000010959397,0.000014186029,0.0017952371,0.000100286576,0.00014834532,0.0015279086,0.9918669,0.000034032786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9573747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9860706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28289944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06342325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2581304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9463929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1472795679","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2609499","title":"The Women and Men of Harvard Law School: The Preliminary Results from the HLS Career Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04644426580776532,"score_gpt":0.3401525525661528,"score_spread":0.29370828675838745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1472795679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9597274,0.0014977466,0.000074257514,0.020002162,0.00019462492,0.000052826013,0.00025055962,0.0000033637953,0.018196985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807068,0.0010626639,0.000050958708,0.0049124802,0.0001946967,0.000060977374,0.00014174987,0.000008308583,0.012861429],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962767,0.001465269,0.00006367844,0.00020476685,0.0005381807,0.0014514419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98405033,0.004836235,0.001594289,0.00034033932,0.0015271524,0.007651591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064584026,0.00038769247,0.00070190546,0.003090735,0.016336128,0.0060777925,0.0011096415,0.0022989255,0.018099103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01726421,0.00043841818,0.00030147738,0.0038577411,0.0053242245,0.0068706754,0.00542462,0.0041177496,0.0010934757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061922055,0.0013047069,0.62316346,0.00009200232,0.000039738636,0.0006523341,0.2968717,0.00005156386,0.00030768316,0.015543567,0.024371622,0.03698235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000665578,0.00025696328,0.36349434,0.0001984428,0.000025297086,0.00006976401,0.60344535,0.00005847765,0.00015025087,0.0016665884,0.030542156,0.000025750898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12584186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2858147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12584186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039351624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010522262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25021875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1473696116","doi":"","title":"The Judicial Regulation of Lawyers in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Foundation (evidence); Law; Public interest; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017584719940105673,"score_gpt":0.2942136945084571,"score_spread":0.2766289745683514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1473696116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48748767,0.010237143,0.0027112053,0.2524497,0.00061282795,0.00024684166,0.0006030603,0.000176205,0.24547535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95405436,0.0019964098,0.0008006464,0.016610565,0.00009666323,0.000025973022,0.000088331064,0.00001883791,0.026308263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869646,0.0010965414,0.0002986694,0.0012892302,0.0043718726,0.005979053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98030794,0.0037756495,0.0020481553,0.00045045497,0.00800152,0.005416271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050590266,0.00020612018,0.00040854115,0.0022182202,0.022712559,0.010085202,0.0027789078,0.004403226,0.0051482106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018338349,0.00057533267,0.00035286695,0.002903746,0.009097769,0.0013484971,0.0030411137,0.00491083,0.0002970936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019596449,0.00023425756,0.0761695,0.00033195873,0.000092483235,0.0017421558,0.03564146,0.0028968926,0.004447321,0.67145765,0.11515147,0.09163877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022117418,0.00018997483,0.2668783,0.00068287604,0.00022542647,0.00039530633,0.03500807,0.0064279144,0.0033016359,0.034721978,0.65149343,0.00045391844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99752825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7632554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23674457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33766198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8852681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147789528","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-931-1.ch089","title":"Knowledge Sharing in Legal Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Knowledge management; Business; Knowledge sharing; Legal practice; Context (archaeology); Practice of law; Public relations; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08127254413743325,"score_gpt":0.38485079585648024,"score_spread":0.303578251719047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147789528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0144961625,0.015682964,0.015741432,0.013929806,0.00034842535,0.00005529228,0.000017058943,0.000039696457,0.9396893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8180293,0.020373005,0.009871777,0.0025301492,0.0007368883,0.00022093697,0.00005637292,0.00006710397,0.14811444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946569,0.0031759276,0.00016476872,0.00048414967,0.0010295737,0.00048867613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996221,0.0024615831,0.00027358308,0.0005499113,0.00022193158,0.00027191834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043363743,0.00043726584,0.00040437834,0.0018056209,0.0058256765,0.011110381,0.0014697942,0.0052168258,0.011734013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054235985,0.00028421998,0.00038855048,0.0031106758,0.019161075,0.01542267,0.009649889,0.0032295221,0.0017362342],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035261266,0.00002015195,0.00008947659,0.000082502054,0.0000026579871,0.00010791465,0.012970573,0.00028123113,0.0000804882,0.9534451,0.0030668583,0.029849648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005110802,0.000020279049,0.0002596934,0.0005682786,0.0000039817087,0.0002750976,0.007870533,0.00055075303,0.0001818972,0.7888941,0.20135827,0.0000119240185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030215052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022503736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011734013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006448136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006189985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0467847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147977947","doi":"","title":"Painful Injustices: Encountering Social Suffering in Clinical Legal Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Politics; Sociology; Legal education; Psychology; Reification (Marxism); Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.042640641369725035,"score_gpt":0.43761429173849603,"score_spread":0.39497365036877097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147977947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8492094,0.0065168785,0.010979419,0.05433334,0.00074527756,0.0002127323,0.000025645915,0.00010308568,0.07787408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895337,0.0020728628,0.0012894761,0.0033038806,0.00014347091,0.00007930557,0.000013238599,0.000036679532,0.0035272932],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.978433,0.016212013,0.00037978648,0.00075841736,0.0019087587,0.002307973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864427,0.00881128,0.0018774939,0.0005679119,0.0005517956,0.0017488897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008726588,0.001002277,0.000990833,0.0020533742,0.019703064,0.011914718,0.0026115458,0.006614465,0.005473561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019805497,0.00070652476,0.0006436062,0.0011176505,0.059722785,0.011275319,0.027231053,0.011644013,0.00068850536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016971264,0.00006605114,0.0011235205,0.00012213101,0.000008223815,0.0022134036,0.97244304,0.0000865114,0.0003583478,0.016434642,0.0012554062,0.005871699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000092768505,0.00006672623,0.0008946685,0.00026677866,0.000007632181,0.0032544432,0.9580935,0.00014902889,0.00037639946,0.01058503,0.026273055,0.0000234002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024214287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049877306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019703064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060648816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059996303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0461511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1479932303","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495618.016","title":"Puritanism and the poor","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.03690387872496815,"score_gpt":0.26501203879883994,"score_spread":0.2281081600738718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1479932303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17639978,0.015243971,0.0009463657,0.13153295,0.0005149577,0.00002753594,0.000063376254,0.000036897938,0.6752342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94088894,0.003515221,0.00027483364,0.011488452,0.00017684502,0.000035519046,0.000012658089,0.000023685936,0.043583807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978466,0.0012793608,0.00003403521,0.00014674389,0.0002122121,0.00048104866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983798,0.0006004622,0.0001734157,0.0001410734,0.00021447008,0.00049075135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022534989,0.00020125078,0.00025458058,0.000997905,0.012790663,0.006405885,0.0005131021,0.0018463668,0.0058693606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024341596,0.00022418199,0.00016536996,0.0009315742,0.031171927,0.0033529832,0.008551108,0.00471733,0.00041743772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028826182,0.00004601204,0.0026469617,0.000056370718,0.0000073208635,0.00027750558,0.047501877,0.00007422649,0.00010790235,0.9213338,0.016633637,0.0112854885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021593834,0.000042818305,0.005104733,0.0005219916,0.000007713299,0.0004254068,0.049373213,0.00015049266,0.00023443543,0.3463144,0.5977731,0.00003022221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007890969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011800058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012790663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004298914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003985227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031190932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480616741","doi":"","title":"A Quarter Century, Not a Raised Voice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UKnowledge (University of Kentucky)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); History","score_opus":0.02706064526348537,"score_gpt":0.2918643942251525,"score_spread":0.2648037489616671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480616741","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003428675,0.008895177,0.00017258638,0.92149556,0.05456412,0.0000033905883,0.00003294186,0.000034163353,0.014459186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010360839,0.0036501347,0.00025225352,0.78532547,0.020266714,0.000018679279,0.000039665578,0.000109722765,0.1799766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963471,0.0008837762,0.00017247278,0.0007118316,0.0013013758,0.0005833955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895187,0.0025794592,0.00058245455,0.00067101256,0.0035391797,0.003109231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004398724,0.00046453418,0.0005991537,0.00053156615,0.007595177,0.009535343,0.0011933583,0.011746615,0.02521356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023855733,0.0003414558,0.0004234857,0.000635451,0.006791318,0.010373814,0.0037398161,0.024711752,0.014654687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000140805905,0.000007381154,0.00009747098,0.000023457525,0.000003324454,0.000051335675,0.00046155782,0.0000071123795,0.00008217998,0.022010094,0.9700103,0.0072317286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002731879,0.0000072595376,0.0001202188,0.00008458869,0.0000019180482,0.00005552945,0.0009471149,0.0000110196515,0.000053538966,0.0038956336,0.99481446,0.0000059032063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053683734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013464089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02521356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002713078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053267856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084347785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482438775","doi":"","title":"A Tribute to Andrew W. McThenia, Jr.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Surprise; Silence; Humility; Law; Conversation; Revelation; Art history; Classics; Philosophy; Sociology; History; Theology; Aesthetics; Political science","score_opus":0.05333455671530522,"score_gpt":0.39506169587541057,"score_spread":0.34172713916010533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482438775","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011341446,0.021196716,0.0011688742,0.44888628,0.1387731,0.00010511133,0.0006454958,0.0007854271,0.3873049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004882913,0.0035936253,0.00046194287,0.0436526,0.005857406,0.000052327392,0.00018250525,0.00020182329,0.9411148],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808073,0.00020538429,0.00007539506,0.0003662408,0.0008998124,0.00037233334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939803,0.00041106276,0.0002867402,0.00030759504,0.002829514,0.0021848655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014279038,0.00082586525,0.0006222851,0.0012083437,0.0067512537,0.0045204894,0.0011922335,0.0033623914,0.16830294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009934111,0.00047287944,0.00043353706,0.0007655184,0.0011947157,0.0026910282,0.0027527786,0.007388588,0.1264112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033419687,0.00000400555,0.000047965015,0.0000063527473,4.8275643e-7,0.00002477958,0.000027336888,0.0000044449207,0.00001764376,0.0006481975,0.99368685,0.0055286004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013069695,0.000003803986,0.00022657587,0.000036745885,7.3190415e-7,0.000111133566,0.00014419932,0.000011475021,0.000021731554,0.00021809983,0.99922085,0.0000032969265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025669152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042927813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16830294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022651863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041410276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5630294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482523054","doi":"10.22329/celt.v6i0.3734","title":"15. Real Life and the Classroom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Merge (version control); Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Perception; Psychology; Identity (music); Reflection (computer programming); Critical reflection; Sociology; Computer science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.01742221662078548,"score_gpt":0.3197280660783272,"score_spread":0.30230584945754174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482523054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05260209,0.0072676744,0.005097869,0.07218197,0.0010936608,0.00006904556,0.00011974343,0.000076353834,0.8614917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8763125,0.0022871967,0.002694565,0.013300848,0.00051166664,0.00011800667,0.000096715725,0.00006198336,0.104616635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611074,0.0023045586,0.00018313485,0.00046685338,0.00046994383,0.00046480916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962936,0.0014231544,0.00041318554,0.00041979432,0.000680719,0.000769445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028122426,0.00034266466,0.00023687657,0.00077309494,0.004900332,0.009622681,0.00084561436,0.003712794,0.012252015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005273719,0.00015832069,0.00028469405,0.0004909119,0.023552412,0.005952429,0.0053427666,0.0036509063,0.0016267581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009462967,0.000029895813,0.0010578663,0.000057041303,0.000002303599,0.000089308865,0.05384304,0.000044075663,0.00017347865,0.92442846,0.0092079975,0.011057107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018580486,0.000045599856,0.0037300992,0.00046987835,0.0000085643405,0.00024770718,0.069340356,0.00009836175,0.0005626824,0.19158913,0.7338655,0.00002348359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011374791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012717367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012252015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004561978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004268133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040987015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484134142","doi":"","title":"The Path from Problem to Scholarship: Two Voices","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Path (computing); Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.041827560605358,"score_gpt":0.41296047709507483,"score_spread":0.3711329164897168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484134142","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065071066,0.005127892,0.002465095,0.95463425,0.001862612,0.000016781463,0.000024493615,0.00002519138,0.029336596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7798738,0.009180853,0.0057905735,0.17355339,0.007921579,0.00025075025,0.00007005478,0.00032609864,0.02303296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.977113,0.012640017,0.00070086133,0.0020881433,0.00433773,0.003120239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93446344,0.04949646,0.0020192405,0.0035396486,0.0041733994,0.006307823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025663048,0.00059936015,0.0013447375,0.0028313904,0.01622882,0.027054563,0.003517624,0.028731856,0.013904275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056920227,0.00063767267,0.000669082,0.0025897487,0.08717746,0.048994392,0.022669543,0.02935668,0.0012500725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022813067,0.000035498393,0.000251939,0.00008628821,0.000003325417,0.00013401681,0.021165775,0.000025448358,0.000047902886,0.9488872,0.021209061,0.008130726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061008042,0.000024588267,0.00025449877,0.00041453706,0.0000058999576,0.00026277232,0.055056103,0.0002497337,0.000112731715,0.82263887,0.12088861,0.00003061875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003717489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00465667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028731856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008105537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01961434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13572079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485565449","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1414024","title":"Cowboy Jurists &amp; the Making of Legal Professionalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04417401958455262,"score_gpt":0.4215565461046336,"score_spread":0.377382526520081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485565449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015696965,0.008762916,0.0044929283,0.27564767,0.0012239828,0.000047632515,0.000056104585,0.000036473568,0.6940353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85678744,0.0033524607,0.003863696,0.027507208,0.0012621919,0.00012105555,0.000023435057,0.00009853015,0.10698394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894883,0.0060920753,0.00027869965,0.0012196545,0.0019181006,0.0010030762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870368,0.009351236,0.00059914467,0.00082514255,0.0012951487,0.0008924539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008272123,0.00033479877,0.00055408076,0.0027144381,0.01942515,0.016453315,0.0015813336,0.018880142,0.013470924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027098503,0.00061096955,0.00045854866,0.0016706977,0.05857689,0.011290757,0.0065183844,0.015010749,0.0012057447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024289038,0.0000049444984,0.00004193591,0.0000063755406,0.0000010633472,0.000033042812,0.0021386386,0.000026348423,0.000013041475,0.9860963,0.009504177,0.002131749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010101931,0.000005647674,0.00024328202,0.00010396576,0.000003929004,0.00005203533,0.0034003977,0.00016249764,0.0001124541,0.88235795,0.11353679,0.000010893279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021824032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033079565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021824032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01140152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011347117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08272421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486099690","doi":"","title":"Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Future of Self-Regulation—Canada between the United States and the English /Australian Experience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Centennial; Legal profession; Accountability; Political science; Legal ethics; Independence (probability theory); Discipline; Professional responsibility; Legal service; Law; Public administration; Medicine","score_opus":0.01616329704702252,"score_gpt":0.2905029206359261,"score_spread":0.27433962358890357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486099690","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27718878,0.027581982,0.0011344608,0.53448987,0.0016367596,0.00005460925,0.00007324864,0.000040945164,0.1577993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9288243,0.006609833,0.0004923393,0.03803706,0.00009228589,0.000025924546,0.000019399486,0.000023044053,0.02587592],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98996663,0.0029453912,0.00024772904,0.0006857967,0.0023837292,0.0037706955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98928285,0.0024873791,0.00050874415,0.00026914247,0.0028889303,0.0045629265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008303472,0.0002083665,0.00047474657,0.0011002288,0.035830773,0.01610647,0.0018450068,0.0054902327,0.0037620883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009246204,0.00035839275,0.0003833475,0.0025964046,0.027640657,0.005784931,0.0075631053,0.010206342,0.00021159665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000685281,0.00011639349,0.008462305,0.00015197042,0.000018106313,0.0010985145,0.52852154,0.0002940264,0.00033905808,0.35786763,0.0437927,0.059269264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020871961,0.000054343676,0.021186316,0.00070278236,0.000021738764,0.00026735046,0.44087303,0.00046196746,0.00025412874,0.023369925,0.51261437,0.00017313754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98696786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.901248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09875203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17411873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71649945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491539208","doi":"","title":"Sex Discrimination in the Legal Profession: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ValpoScholar (Valparaiso University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Legal profession; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11396173995862537,"score_gpt":0.328615772026623,"score_spread":0.21465403206799766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491539208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38154253,0.20789091,0.00074983214,0.1557886,0.0021779228,0.000027768025,0.00013473835,0.000014462824,0.25167316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9460526,0.037220832,0.0001477415,0.004471165,0.0016377895,0.000011722862,0.000030194486,0.000008467998,0.010419423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988562,0.00050991494,0.0000328225,0.0001237367,0.00014773711,0.0003295051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807525,0.0010416455,0.00025346468,0.000052262658,0.00020235484,0.00037499896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020286727,0.00020460969,0.00022045497,0.0023154786,0.00550176,0.006587865,0.00062256714,0.003354684,0.0058653215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003168561,0.0001957025,0.00014861101,0.002847688,0.013103236,0.0030618238,0.0021796124,0.0029761388,0.00021877394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060119466,0.000144433,0.010707524,0.00040649937,0.0000132329815,0.001313956,0.13426043,0.00015189953,0.00048306404,0.78441846,0.008892359,0.059147906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019002568,0.00011272406,0.03083176,0.001530415,0.000016299597,0.0017504318,0.14914386,0.00024319577,0.0003876352,0.05061741,0.7653043,0.000042886626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015609263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03221368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015609263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070329625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038358804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051027954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492520929","doi":"10.29173/alr22","title":"Judicial Fundraising in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.10231751106640614,"score_gpt":0.39393912670160347,"score_spread":0.29162161563519734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492520929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103139125,0.055255935,0.002943575,0.36117396,0.002986175,0.00032720456,0.0006090432,0.00014744623,0.47341752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84699374,0.023355374,0.0033316463,0.055273272,0.00066335563,0.00008424332,0.0002676313,0.00006306068,0.06996777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97632354,0.002830807,0.0007326323,0.001760038,0.011272061,0.0070808553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96677655,0.0072607496,0.0020225076,0.00091680937,0.01752328,0.005500143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012730131,0.00031775952,0.00052992225,0.0025484776,0.019729063,0.013228703,0.003236429,0.007619775,0.0043681785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032952335,0.0006179143,0.00051681313,0.0031444796,0.010605726,0.0017047183,0.0030518307,0.00666405,0.00034173622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005088025,0.000058925503,0.008696023,0.0004915934,0.00004875899,0.0012235228,0.01071799,0.0024565726,0.0007309557,0.6963427,0.2085096,0.070672415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007531924,0.000052488715,0.03388797,0.0011736415,0.00010096741,0.0004306893,0.007946399,0.0016878902,0.0007086646,0.033757243,0.91997147,0.00020729302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98700017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99321353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17515804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17515804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38231036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9566997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492537368","doi":"","title":"The Negotiator as Professional: Understanding the Competing Interests of a Representative Negotiator","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Expansive; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Public relations; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Dispute resolution; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05112167438961226,"score_gpt":0.3572585693835673,"score_spread":0.3061368949939551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492537368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10344963,0.0057559432,0.22808535,0.09243909,0.00069656415,0.00019635321,0.000024478486,0.00012052446,0.5692321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95947564,0.0020443983,0.017380286,0.0037655728,0.00022948936,0.0001390794,0.000022932494,0.000078921585,0.016863698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96126777,0.031228336,0.0005329307,0.0017648039,0.0030773045,0.0021288968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97843266,0.01540975,0.0018247137,0.0010586074,0.0011290256,0.0021452417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028509581,0.00052914047,0.0007342765,0.0027546554,0.013785741,0.021459844,0.0024200699,0.009696614,0.0054851137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035260487,0.00072586787,0.0007491947,0.0016091282,0.037918005,0.030442158,0.010498527,0.0074457363,0.0010842124],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011993153,0.000013943476,0.00047911142,0.00003854344,0.0000052231017,0.00020120249,0.05917532,0.00027881237,0.00010379224,0.93253934,0.0012972689,0.005855555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020947617,0.000045479297,0.0004555998,0.0002777709,0.000017561577,0.00061539887,0.07988685,0.0037788905,0.00028806974,0.7922849,0.122292206,0.00003627558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031683184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028825293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028509581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006090336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00959805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1507749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492745871","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v22i1.406","title":"Clinic is the Basis for a Complete Legal Education: Quality Assurance, Learning Outcomes and the Clinical Method","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Experiential learning; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Legal profession; Reading (process); Quality (philosophy); Legal practice; Legal research; Law; Pedagogy; Medical education; Sociology; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3103317981614379,"score_gpt":0.6279572059074269,"score_spread":0.31762540774598896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492745871","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14987093,0.039955795,0.08787863,0.58586556,0.0025749484,0.0013418545,0.0003699783,0.00044906992,0.13169326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9310557,0.007223591,0.03782506,0.016178116,0.0011965232,0.0011040663,0.0001773694,0.0001592079,0.0050803763],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90565914,0.06394136,0.0037268,0.002021552,0.022029625,0.0026215345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80110687,0.1374923,0.026299125,0.0074814954,0.014457335,0.013162836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10159915,0.0003316044,0.000781407,0.0033663358,0.0035877302,0.01836538,0.001929246,0.0034875583,0.0056549436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.167269,0.00030668016,0.0006094929,0.0034392835,0.01617415,0.01665947,0.009017373,0.005113974,0.00052063435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000291378,0.00065177254,0.04065417,0.0019096611,0.000069181224,0.00023069963,0.022254495,0.0005397881,0.00032032546,0.36520603,0.022016412,0.54585606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031551073,0.0028492536,0.15669835,0.015790984,0.00025210448,0.002497425,0.068269975,0.0080349995,0.0036334065,0.55835134,0.18277362,0.00053293543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056055933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062447237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10159915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008122779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018371366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53731406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493974835","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1246","title":"The First Women Lawyers: \"Piecemeal Progress and Circumscribed Success\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Legal profession; Sociology; Public relations; History","score_opus":0.024583178638408927,"score_gpt":0.349152384188517,"score_spread":0.3245692055501081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493974835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42361408,0.007975534,0.0019912054,0.2049653,0.0013379653,0.00006981457,0.00008231981,0.0000881701,0.35987556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955121,0.0015925665,0.0003213704,0.005446102,0.00020205353,0.000031661515,0.000014266704,0.00005769365,0.03721325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911897,0.0039978153,0.00012303455,0.0007818766,0.0012427946,0.0026648275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913025,0.0048066853,0.0006809444,0.00043321186,0.0009937282,0.0017829926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008421841,0.0003757621,0.00042490222,0.0019194346,0.022961099,0.017260611,0.0012036373,0.0033634305,0.007393741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023483125,0.0004742079,0.00017691156,0.0014651191,0.03836859,0.009605827,0.013378108,0.0068995534,0.0008224507],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004093322,0.000053171647,0.002491435,0.000048992428,0.0000046398213,0.00051200035,0.63861877,0.00005083855,0.0002855473,0.30422938,0.020670261,0.032994043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018454952,0.000060789615,0.0027860887,0.00031091511,0.0000064420897,0.00021935966,0.40305927,0.00006962681,0.00051222974,0.026902473,0.56602645,0.000027964594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020517964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042696185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022961099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011332106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011335745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082220614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494399948","doi":"","title":"Law: A Profession, Not a Life","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Headline; Law; Legal education; Legal profession; Practice of law; Professional responsibility; Political science; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.04306044691882384,"score_gpt":0.3645422509587772,"score_spread":0.32148180403995336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494399948","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039490988,0.00500273,0.0011169884,0.8849452,0.008538159,0.0000126785435,0.000028909433,0.000088124114,0.09631813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25413886,0.0059532523,0.0023584808,0.53359705,0.0062668505,0.0000780992,0.0000683943,0.00018590805,0.19735314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99133825,0.004269757,0.00020094431,0.0007263856,0.0020289992,0.001435707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832493,0.0026618142,0.00073246297,0.0009039691,0.0022980478,0.010154345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052635404,0.00036668516,0.00045759825,0.00082955207,0.019899348,0.019493397,0.0011668396,0.008542929,0.021093495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013792362,0.0003361909,0.00031944198,0.0008480428,0.03368123,0.01920168,0.008028033,0.015317513,0.0077589937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001561065,0.00008333287,0.0011670755,0.000106847016,0.000008599146,0.00028145878,0.04109164,0.000025087293,0.00030885445,0.29853934,0.62064373,0.037728354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005336315,0.000024132281,0.00059891504,0.00022437981,0.0000025479935,0.000246258,0.04078118,0.000027184818,0.00004483263,0.027652469,0.9303786,0.0000142060635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007052393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013220303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021093495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004438162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012649658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07056475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495515455","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4538","title":"Creeping Capitalism and Academic Culture at a Canadian Law School","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Corporatization; Scholarship; Restructuring; Commodification; Academic freedom; Marketization; Capitalism; Autonomy; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Law; Higher education; Economy; Economics","score_opus":0.09399959374712731,"score_gpt":0.3947832737597534,"score_spread":0.3007836800126261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495515455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98585826,0.00017646364,0.0000548324,0.0013375919,0.00001142869,0.000013406881,0.00004026077,0.0000033216813,0.012504469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805355,0.00013344124,0.00004460988,0.00012139956,0.0000025731238,0.0000031369832,0.000018048599,0.000002224677,0.001620944],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954749,0.0005862285,0.00007774295,0.00028746124,0.001678813,0.0018948944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920047,0.0008940412,0.00087613706,0.00016643506,0.0024031284,0.0036555375],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002688663,0.00019577566,0.0004004908,0.0034283136,0.033055726,0.009030869,0.001915467,0.0007957306,0.0039626127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006792492,0.00023417691,0.00028255512,0.0045106728,0.011782167,0.0016633146,0.005027591,0.0023545518,0.00017678694],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114114955,0.00036141847,0.38260022,0.000064329084,0.000039573722,0.00080861256,0.5235028,0.000455861,0.0010455408,0.035882458,0.005089808,0.050035205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000108640015,0.00007244764,0.40899935,0.00010485774,0.00001899644,0.00011988454,0.5651298,0.000410734,0.00039259196,0.0013909922,0.02328437,0.000065123866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98360056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11733063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113638654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8512973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497090025","doi":"","title":"Workplace and Policy Ethics: A Call to End the Solitudes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Politics; Corporate governance; Political science; Government (linguistics); Cronyism; Divergence (linguistics); Business ethics; Convergence (economics); Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Public relations; Political economy; Law; Economics; Management; Economic growth","score_opus":0.031366069205509106,"score_gpt":0.40689831466032306,"score_spread":0.37553224545481395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497090025","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012512871,0.005453058,0.001624207,0.9771171,0.0013438114,0.000007215394,0.0000055632167,0.000018632069,0.013179089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2932567,0.012410033,0.009849425,0.65036047,0.009839066,0.00019446267,0.000040356532,0.00018842667,0.023861088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93402797,0.04598378,0.0017910174,0.0020258871,0.010462451,0.0057089226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89897066,0.06996731,0.0034373836,0.0055731167,0.011471902,0.01057973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054277077,0.0008220174,0.0016767508,0.0029162602,0.023205083,0.031797912,0.003237646,0.036140516,0.0058242707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061733842,0.0006104951,0.0010303746,0.0021770597,0.12301761,0.04179788,0.015162296,0.04673907,0.0014172737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014566125,0.000049484905,0.00034787523,0.0001056649,0.000008900969,0.00013399882,0.03236143,0.0001439889,0.00009606256,0.8706136,0.07866665,0.017457781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015834952,0.000019388384,0.00041699054,0.0007296419,0.000003802748,0.00009161801,0.037016533,0.00020654668,0.00007499612,0.66388804,0.29750896,0.000027592374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025227662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030201329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054277077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024515046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0508234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28704804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497391720","doi":"10.53300/001c.6224","title":"International and Comparative Indigenous Rights Via Video Conferencing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Aotearoa; Videoconferencing; Globe; Indigenous rights; Situated; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering; Psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.06621100589952023,"score_gpt":0.4378553727430629,"score_spread":0.3716443668435427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497391720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2607835,0.000838641,0.0027150107,0.0012519977,0.00012359083,0.00017010554,0.00027474505,0.0000494306,0.733793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88531345,0.0017596544,0.002862851,0.00015970509,0.00005850414,0.00019354436,0.00019296676,0.00002604788,0.10943327],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983209,0.0009565716,0.00005182258,0.00012871686,0.00030817435,0.000233809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982932,0.00096182554,0.00009776622,0.00024467715,0.00025499988,0.00014737854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003063363,0.00013174718,0.00012454548,0.00094300765,0.0019057154,0.0015259142,0.0005287056,0.00046149804,0.037826926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074481335,0.00008372096,0.000106397616,0.001155034,0.0010578372,0.0017638073,0.0022321555,0.0006737871,0.0013158538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026236248,0.0008121098,0.007522846,0.00053162617,0.000024281702,0.0009247718,0.13773328,0.0005058751,0.0051274495,0.17778426,0.035974335,0.63279676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006632167,0.00073553587,0.079638734,0.00063892064,0.00006436742,0.00097646075,0.12873484,0.0011271507,0.0057397936,0.013195025,0.7690142,0.000068702946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023334496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05472236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037826926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015260398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021789675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1265437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499385902","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i3.2246","title":"Classifying and Analyzing Analogies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Analogical reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Inductive reasoning; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Psychology","score_opus":0.10003130450068803,"score_gpt":0.40196325531168026,"score_spread":0.3019319508109922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499385902","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14017537,0.007289327,0.66411436,0.006578893,0.00034682994,0.0010403029,0.001292212,0.0009832298,0.17817946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6334085,0.0023972008,0.3517977,0.0008037693,0.0003633023,0.00075930357,0.0022962508,0.0002485579,0.007925466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860799,0.0060998034,0.0012183005,0.0022575215,0.0037490667,0.0005954795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97259235,0.017405635,0.0021589787,0.004474867,0.002738378,0.00062981463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006502014,0.00089017965,0.0011583169,0.01436733,0.0037429088,0.012685562,0.0026511475,0.0027703438,0.012742476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054247648,0.0006236563,0.0016562365,0.00993178,0.012240404,0.019532919,0.0067857816,0.0035297812,0.0010059424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003417216,0.000046527974,0.0030209275,0.00020836925,0.000055423112,0.0002250582,0.0034806607,0.0018462578,0.00041412824,0.9371469,0.0014953562,0.052026298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001196984,0.000017091834,0.0012341585,0.000108166394,0.000024948049,0.00015461631,0.0014168812,0.0051515163,0.0003440743,0.97030234,0.02121657,0.000017569993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027452216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001688248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01436733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041789804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020604734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04262787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500599573","doi":"","title":"Precarious Liability: The High Court in Lepore, Samin and Rich on School Responsibility for Assaults by Teachers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Tort; Vicarious liability; Law; Plaintiff; Political science; Liability; Legislation; Skepticism; High Court; Jurisprudence; Sociology","score_opus":0.15325772867855983,"score_gpt":0.4529972014882455,"score_spread":0.2997394728096857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500599573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34199974,0.006386469,0.0041637127,0.20783924,0.0006813978,0.00026945255,0.00031522915,0.00014354695,0.43820122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.851841,0.00079237396,0.0018080231,0.091338016,0.00023182215,0.00014770348,0.000046197056,0.000030301855,0.05376459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876709,0.004052507,0.00047706693,0.0012584296,0.002557423,0.003983626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911752,0.0059927413,0.0004652356,0.0003719163,0.00077151094,0.0012233676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074047344,0.0003321201,0.00079601887,0.0009169289,0.02529923,0.00998776,0.002392026,0.019429056,0.0028566048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015215218,0.0008447393,0.0010183865,0.0007970796,0.009223486,0.0036271922,0.0056401994,0.018103264,0.0004784794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011215966,0.0001253405,0.0069772545,0.000114541435,0.000058507336,0.006963238,0.047676615,0.0006315919,0.001528102,0.81417096,0.10897704,0.012664695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028719695,0.00048020956,0.044656396,0.0023796286,0.00033386325,0.0036326672,0.090918235,0.0037672513,0.0057650763,0.2023734,0.64469045,0.00071561657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20561047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38868603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20561047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010371998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015846178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40882736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502083875","doi":"","title":"Legal Education in Asia: Globalization, Change and Contexts – In Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Globalization; Legal history; Vocational education; State (computer science); Legal profession; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04517568385182079,"score_gpt":0.37183215620557186,"score_spread":0.32665647235375106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502083875","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002947441,0.9972373,0.000020583706,0.0007522241,0.00021907991,0.0000019346626,0.0000037731395,0.0000010968196,0.0014692129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016945385,0.99745804,0.000027527236,0.0003291691,0.00026500458,0.0000034216714,0.000005799105,6.780414e-7,0.00021582497],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961495,0.000118917604,0.00006535122,0.000045687815,0.000101829464,0.00005317741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998131,0.0010170157,0.0003498785,0.00003139614,0.000330151,0.00014066265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010226809,0.00049869297,0.0011299798,0.0025278293,0.0006005598,0.0033134099,0.0006013738,0.0013415157,0.0028727807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018424165,0.00026840068,0.0003117649,0.0073689814,0.0015884489,0.0037815843,0.0015006714,0.001279678,0.0006881984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008146987,0.0001393956,0.002288938,0.04885804,0.0001826032,0.00068525685,0.0035394875,0.00043790505,0.00056156126,0.015414326,0.058342613,0.86946845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011531394,0.000107943226,0.0067400825,0.028877068,0.0001616424,0.0012625699,0.004883196,0.000073030526,0.00020355712,0.0022769517,0.9553762,0.000026137464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033298924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006090362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033298924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011460859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004864222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009610474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504247832","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511815300.005","title":"Legal education and the politics of law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ruler; Politics; Scholarship; Law; Political science; Legitimacy; State (computer science); Subordination (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03620735046111998,"score_gpt":0.28486267030804185,"score_spread":0.24865531984692188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504247832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006027104,0.021226455,0.0015171166,0.03075218,0.00028664363,0.0000138403175,0.000010464949,0.00002650473,0.9401397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56152904,0.021208143,0.0016403693,0.009215219,0.0008561918,0.00007467802,0.00002660341,0.000042704694,0.40540695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988513,0.0005824761,0.000021114554,0.00008907499,0.00026675785,0.0001893609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990858,0.0006224825,0.00006230215,0.000051697007,0.00008571506,0.00009200444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011276352,0.000269941,0.0001909648,0.0007584055,0.0045807995,0.005937902,0.00046777775,0.0026335784,0.008480712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018754997,0.00016601599,0.00012518116,0.00093417586,0.025096068,0.0034245343,0.0019830868,0.00471379,0.0011027777],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012014152,0.000011728846,0.000034136552,0.000015235351,2.9910268e-7,0.00001805077,0.0020383508,0.00006795438,0.000024236586,0.9854726,0.0053481953,0.006967969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075625226,0.000011899311,0.00045587562,0.00034801423,0.0000013045433,0.000050913306,0.0029970678,0.0003283925,0.00012303109,0.50947607,0.48619482,0.0000050971726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008854123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012141198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008854123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008359217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070099663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060650706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504315326","doi":"10.5430/wje.v5n3p91","title":"Counselling Strategies for Curbing Examination Malpractices in Secondary Schools in Enugu State, Nigeria","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cronbach's alpha; Malpractice; Stratified sampling; Medical education; Psychology; Sample (material); Family medicine; Medicine; Political science; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Law","score_opus":0.07362996609777571,"score_gpt":0.4200072839731512,"score_spread":0.34637731787537546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504315326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99349445,0.0013535238,0.00043505136,0.0016118538,0.000022413444,0.00017538297,0.000013059939,0.000014210716,0.0028800657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955504,0.0010930342,0.0015831462,0.0003736813,0.0000068779354,0.00004957311,0.000009672627,0.0000018043423,0.001331867],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675155,0.0019397036,0.00019485725,0.00015178596,0.00047849267,0.00048365307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99518126,0.0016346116,0.001489378,0.00012322045,0.00045582812,0.0011157948],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029361588,0.00028931172,0.0003100203,0.0011496065,0.0035229616,0.0011877058,0.0008808484,0.0011009617,0.0030465587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006814554,0.00030823314,0.0001838503,0.0005491082,0.00091989286,0.0007237607,0.0019471017,0.001018287,0.0002767235],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019623897,0.0032322682,0.3159057,0.0022781417,0.000036231664,0.004099533,0.2585105,0.0002891053,0.0056091663,0.0020875859,0.0038945656,0.403861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051875533,0.0018344206,0.39673644,0.0036259785,0.00007004657,0.0033180828,0.5473974,0.0010719681,0.0034441669,0.0010868551,0.04128219,0.000080592356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004930208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015686693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99889904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015331769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067725666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015528083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W150828450","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2737","title":"Book Note: Indispensable Counsel: The Chief Legal Officer In The New Reality, by E Norman Veasey and Christine T Di Guglielmo","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Law; Political science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.019776549362517302,"score_gpt":0.33359918458753085,"score_spread":0.3138226352250135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W150828450","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002776058,0.0213069,0.00045832136,0.85351497,0.07206319,0.000046422145,0.00012289957,0.00006122028,0.052148446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036818557,0.010925872,0.00055043906,0.5123804,0.033995647,0.00008160841,0.00006411104,0.00009884983,0.43822113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880207,0.00037884238,0.00007772818,0.00020488376,0.0004280031,0.0001084003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99366564,0.0041220337,0.00016201267,0.00011512054,0.0011816178,0.0007535989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023501462,0.0007151994,0.00085625675,0.000672095,0.007565732,0.0059678056,0.0019230675,0.014443963,0.028281234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009056663,0.0008460645,0.00041519784,0.0006867674,0.0037406124,0.007916551,0.0019361537,0.016970888,0.014134489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016514808,0.000004045208,0.000021191898,0.000008509063,4.5415158e-7,0.000017691944,0.000087547196,0.000007120622,0.000009320581,0.0020556373,0.99611354,0.0016733423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056079434,0.000006480232,0.0002091319,0.00011370499,0.000002741941,0.000090253525,0.0006741988,0.00003677539,0.000026477157,0.002886809,0.9959383,0.000009627491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037919104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15633477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037919104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034295109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071750167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094610155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W150857943","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.1834","title":"Winning–Or at Least Not Losing–On Cross-Examination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kimberly-Clark (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Cross-examination; Active listening; Computer science; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Communication; Witness","score_opus":0.10187039147774475,"score_gpt":0.44671963972164647,"score_spread":0.34484924824390173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W150857943","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028116357,0.0073186555,0.0043035094,0.54891914,0.010065201,0.00015534034,0.00014361154,0.00012823165,0.40084985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34881103,0.0053561623,0.0040356335,0.37685853,0.0045475108,0.00024530193,0.00021596659,0.00020077059,0.2597291],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9531984,0.017855614,0.0017649151,0.0030136302,0.014826168,0.009341343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9415816,0.015676938,0.004383446,0.0057154726,0.019539902,0.013102713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028461061,0.00034814677,0.00091717276,0.0011364297,0.008158208,0.0075196684,0.0018995455,0.007719377,0.027897833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14482588,0.00035605993,0.0005516922,0.0007299237,0.009040395,0.008269893,0.007485858,0.009589659,0.011594798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007173022,0.00017489663,0.009342154,0.00036094268,0.000053724114,0.0005419673,0.0048654154,0.00010169517,0.0006247218,0.17840002,0.6567676,0.14869511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002207919,0.00015003028,0.008803456,0.0012398001,0.000032027023,0.0011234857,0.0079526985,0.00014910911,0.0008304702,0.05622985,0.92340153,0.00006542989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005625118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009220519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028461061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003117239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011448628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15051824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510045863","doi":"10.29173/alr342","title":"The End(s) of Self-Regulation?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Commonwealth; Context (archaeology); Political science; State (computer science); Democracy; Regulatory state; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.04185639294426426,"score_gpt":0.3699808382412045,"score_spread":0.32812444529694024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510045863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026511243,0.008047161,0.011661719,0.35644487,0.0014329611,0.000079726524,0.00014191051,0.000087768865,0.59559256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8919668,0.004933359,0.0037122895,0.056130756,0.00083500316,0.00011149849,0.000104292405,0.000053300937,0.042152736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98466575,0.004253449,0.0003640066,0.0019275352,0.0052137463,0.0035754852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864826,0.00422477,0.0011600337,0.0020132102,0.0045179795,0.0016014351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013527287,0.0002654041,0.00057599135,0.0010372156,0.004190263,0.011869754,0.001781935,0.0050619384,0.0043789507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016025605,0.00019912064,0.0007915727,0.00081197923,0.039227486,0.007425543,0.0032390514,0.0064227055,0.0008582523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001504482,0.000018626164,0.0008980213,0.000037652015,0.000008601548,0.000037306523,0.0019734965,0.00007571612,0.0001396961,0.97704583,0.0075735403,0.012176483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003081696,0.00004150139,0.006789499,0.00047765236,0.000026711015,0.00008255002,0.005097303,0.00048229884,0.00074573915,0.6944598,0.29172212,0.000044037843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1511171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11673815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1511171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013141552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03856028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.300475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510362251","doi":"","title":"Beyond the Numbers: What We Know — and Should Know — About American Pro Bono","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economic Justice; Political science; Private sector; Recession; Legal profession; Need to know; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.02025271180653884,"score_gpt":0.3449338871162781,"score_spread":0.3246811753097393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510362251","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052811033,0.15717271,0.0009697371,0.80599135,0.008123619,0.000009742013,0.00030126853,0.000034983208,0.022115441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17160246,0.43544585,0.0017495049,0.34806237,0.034733456,0.00006821265,0.00037926884,0.00012824328,0.007830694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99576277,0.0016711093,0.00025779242,0.0006993398,0.0011341007,0.00047485993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639447,0.024595633,0.0026550298,0.0010802994,0.0053832205,0.002341081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069690174,0.000634944,0.0009469561,0.0030648892,0.0066425004,0.014757621,0.0018357586,0.0058329445,0.013414566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036008663,0.00046367283,0.00050769054,0.005042782,0.0184937,0.034840457,0.002858844,0.017648058,0.0027772605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018760831,0.0002556705,0.008595781,0.0016746481,0.000055925822,0.00021364777,0.0065943254,0.0003980522,0.00027464263,0.20128253,0.42065176,0.3598154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012630498,0.000085257125,0.008905764,0.006310204,0.00004361848,0.00023530639,0.009664751,0.00041093538,0.00024263233,0.2504214,0.72354865,0.000118864744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019908207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02651278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019908207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005335071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0087175835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04487616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510884943","doi":"","title":"The European Commission Project Regarding Competition in Professional Services","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition law; Parliament; Commission; European union; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Political science; Law; European commission; Monopoly; Public administration; European Union law; Business; Economics; International trade; Politics","score_opus":0.02994575142871696,"score_gpt":0.3540007276017969,"score_spread":0.32405497617307993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510884943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006300582,0.027752124,0.012209985,0.06345538,0.003069833,0.00062706246,0.0072035925,0.0007836944,0.87859774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24944593,0.020562014,0.057875566,0.03854718,0.0015292979,0.0025379087,0.017348086,0.0016187604,0.61053526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97808826,0.0063163424,0.0008748628,0.0016298996,0.009410879,0.0036797954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888843,0.003944941,0.0010145596,0.0012773877,0.0018711835,0.0030076527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015166591,0.0016082099,0.0013238298,0.0036529794,0.0021112906,0.009042005,0.0037232048,0.018093847,0.04766421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026440682,0.0005641956,0.0016130588,0.0062087867,0.002691384,0.005152364,0.0071631847,0.0055522704,0.009058577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012244759,0.00015992121,0.0003889736,0.00039660567,0.00001766437,0.00015592536,0.00024022363,0.0011949325,0.0002598418,0.7888377,0.15062453,0.0576012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010132891,0.000107660686,0.0045406776,0.0010433742,0.00001995865,0.00022551039,0.00022694035,0.00081029005,0.00031856488,0.0578201,0.93475175,0.000033813412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06592872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020401962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06592872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011174327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039226893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15945262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512736548","doi":"","title":"St. Thomas Aquinas, Law for the Common Good","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Obligation; Law; Philosophy of law; Political science; Philosophy; Positive law; Comparative law; Sociology; Epistemology; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.040717200570811386,"score_gpt":0.35527229515683345,"score_spread":0.31455509458602204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512736548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021195852,0.25540018,0.0023138784,0.403436,0.00686645,0.000021718433,0.00022794228,0.00010447539,0.32950974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2864422,0.158121,0.004190146,0.13908546,0.009916802,0.000232769,0.00023482786,0.00031261213,0.4014642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986111,0.0005920759,0.000079509664,0.00021249418,0.00035418756,0.00015069619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989392,0.0006535505,0.000092017624,0.000089166635,0.00013235558,0.000093672286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016046361,0.00065809034,0.00043586423,0.001046837,0.0054311585,0.004280224,0.0005613027,0.008806484,0.010472159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043826406,0.00038160008,0.00032198953,0.0014518531,0.011272986,0.0080366125,0.0021789467,0.008611199,0.003124054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009493445,0.000005399985,0.000056280194,0.000049042465,0.0000026405166,0.000059807036,0.0011292004,0.00008126452,0.000043969725,0.79033816,0.20079127,0.0074334866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000740641,0.000008027684,0.00022356721,0.00035582416,0.0000031686445,0.00007065161,0.0005386876,0.00006856852,0.00009280002,0.37398002,0.62464046,0.000010917243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02144363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037324216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02144363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058747325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050136726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042637646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512860480","doi":"","title":"Ethics Teaching in Law School","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Mainstream; Legal education; Curriculum; Variety (cybernetics); Law; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Legal ethics; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Pedagogy; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03565017231796843,"score_gpt":0.4151396643483383,"score_spread":0.3794894920303699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512860480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44453385,0.017454894,0.0053705224,0.1608404,0.0015638713,0.00010534318,0.000039584735,0.00014764881,0.36994392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94181436,0.0040986906,0.0018158446,0.0102414135,0.00035711168,0.00006356233,0.00002412324,0.00006374396,0.0415211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99398994,0.0040096296,0.00015075416,0.00040663817,0.000691333,0.0007517776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99198616,0.003853117,0.00088576524,0.00035605105,0.00086234114,0.002056618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054385685,0.0002246418,0.0003146605,0.0014824824,0.01606806,0.006732182,0.00067664654,0.0030902722,0.009943964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010527626,0.00030428063,0.00024571127,0.0013970583,0.014856865,0.0035000923,0.0050360085,0.0052871937,0.0013395464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003271264,0.0011659643,0.01681225,0.0003789892,0.0000138220175,0.0009850126,0.25362515,0.0006429901,0.0016183574,0.52176845,0.07280645,0.13014993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028010034,0.0001675144,0.019647162,0.0008646384,0.000008696298,0.0005200033,0.14052548,0.0005494042,0.0013971201,0.10979016,0.7264732,0.000028620536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064136013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014391957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01606806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011543048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013414258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08375108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513198725","doi":"","title":"Justice, morality and ethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-publications - Marquette  (Marquette University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Directorate for Biological Sciences; University of Cambridge; Nordiska Afrikainstitutet; European Commission; Strong; York University; University of Pennsylvania; Princeton University; Yale University; University of Oxford; Harvard University; World Bank Group","keywords":"Morality; Economic Justice; Meta-ethics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Nursing ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1839187723008418,"score_gpt":0.3783599560898036,"score_spread":0.1944411837889618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513198725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014160363,0.052371044,0.011955435,0.18100013,0.0026394718,0.00007174875,0.00009292712,0.000056765133,0.7376522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8646482,0.011222025,0.0065359278,0.024202172,0.0050917733,0.000326716,0.000081942126,0.00013984548,0.08775142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878566,0.0073861787,0.0004788273,0.0011965546,0.001845741,0.001236033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907894,0.0077926232,0.0005619562,0.00089688145,0.00095137965,0.0007182106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012339667,0.0007333013,0.0017040304,0.0020777795,0.012457835,0.01983113,0.0016538539,0.01728158,0.009335692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015821561,0.00075995293,0.0006661885,0.0020337377,0.08517637,0.013065915,0.006059687,0.015814947,0.0013334544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034245613,0.000015336173,0.000055007382,0.000022851767,0.000004432874,0.000021249729,0.00141577,0.000043524175,0.000023684703,0.9925685,0.0037163533,0.0021098787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009991101,0.0000067146593,0.00017220415,0.00008392071,0.0000033436297,0.00003755046,0.0011395956,0.000088911314,0.000029333405,0.96532315,0.03309663,0.000008760039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010103097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010582215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01983113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008008046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009940899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06525916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514434797","doi":"","title":"Lulling Ourselves into a False Sense of Competence: Learning Outcomes and Clinical Legal Education in Canada, the United States and Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Legal education; Political science; Competence (human resources); Legal profession; Cornerstone; Curriculum; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04073341228787332,"score_gpt":0.34498401808903517,"score_spread":0.30425060580116187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514434797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8864068,0.004061074,0.00056828867,0.050010838,0.00013730323,0.000106658896,0.00025537994,0.000034744706,0.058418985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946403,0.0012040104,0.0002645684,0.0013494197,0.000014004331,0.00002951168,0.00007429772,0.000014289928,0.0024095934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98115647,0.0031641168,0.0005605416,0.0008892716,0.0101124495,0.0041171517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9434347,0.009595279,0.006281457,0.0007511046,0.019324496,0.020613017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011819328,0.00024158103,0.00080389786,0.0042957333,0.014521952,0.010062419,0.0023962418,0.0017701784,0.0025691092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045567524,0.00035723893,0.00036199138,0.006321211,0.015708271,0.004569223,0.009846089,0.0055981665,0.00017799936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024962152,0.0011877994,0.354984,0.0004738215,0.00010534601,0.0007702902,0.27704212,0.0015243489,0.0004060171,0.09291979,0.023277668,0.2470592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039743652,0.00020596186,0.7800794,0.0008479628,0.00004799992,0.00020946182,0.18121897,0.001858918,0.00031398694,0.008174959,0.02679568,0.00020694394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84168196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15831803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26853138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9762318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514496908","doi":"","title":"Democratic Rights and Social Science Evidence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Political science; Supreme court; Fundamental rights; Charter; Jurisprudence; Democracy; Law; Social rights; International human rights law; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.024909796536344203,"score_gpt":0.36602711046275554,"score_spread":0.3411173139264113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514496908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03085996,0.01038373,0.10234964,0.3058585,0.0015665937,0.00042711364,0.00044677706,0.00012797998,0.5479797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9142881,0.0039887372,0.02616168,0.041296817,0.0014468966,0.00048462837,0.00018228953,0.000045387267,0.012105431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9161842,0.032944556,0.004909614,0.007867531,0.030974403,0.0071197506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7798057,0.16983093,0.014096148,0.013390344,0.018463714,0.0044131177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.082304604,0.0008228943,0.0018193576,0.010295499,0.0132152345,0.024982264,0.005270126,0.009699325,0.0055909506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1811631,0.00096173363,0.0016422115,0.0058461656,0.09656372,0.0234223,0.019025449,0.017098593,0.0006124968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002032125,0.0000065362997,0.00021523391,0.00003501221,0.000005926719,0.00003192187,0.00042184003,0.000101911995,0.000013425616,0.9965419,0.00064271473,0.0019814563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010784505,0.000008164846,0.00042215319,0.00024825614,0.0000141700175,0.000041098454,0.0004909459,0.00047871683,0.0001303718,0.982179,0.015962599,0.000013756179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11368441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090617195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11368441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030336365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.063423306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43527353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514583382","doi":"","title":"A Counter-pedagogy for Social Justice: Core Skills for Community Lawyering","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Legal education; Curriculum; Class (philosophy); Political science; Pedagogy; Sociology; Identity (music); Legal profession; Economic Justice; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.10165354879816263,"score_gpt":0.41637446933044475,"score_spread":0.3147209205322821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514583382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3364412,0.0029211426,0.112359606,0.08854981,0.0023671594,0.0014085205,0.000034829383,0.00078704726,0.45513073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8059052,0.0030513771,0.08912666,0.013254338,0.0005899139,0.0012439077,0.00004597548,0.00011898561,0.08666365],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981183,0.00097231456,0.000054152588,0.0001584527,0.00044163904,0.00025512572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779606,0.0011456233,0.00016466789,0.00015908158,0.00019842347,0.00053627556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015322537,0.00044051703,0.00032007758,0.00073128246,0.0030004464,0.0027273213,0.0010851998,0.002497607,0.005533131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004133591,0.00014894537,0.00030038087,0.0003202143,0.005217172,0.002471219,0.0065385373,0.003896125,0.0007456533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006233017,0.003334845,0.004536604,0.00092233747,0.00001118047,0.0012100759,0.13586172,0.0008410169,0.010889814,0.29110855,0.034640938,0.51658064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012962714,0.0008765522,0.011403383,0.0016656611,0.000020906678,0.0032705886,0.08430899,0.003186563,0.0076641454,0.24030052,0.6471257,0.000047297246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015822366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043107215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005533131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015516822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004881496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018510163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516498904","doi":"","title":"Leveraging Knowledge Assets: Can Law Reform Help?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Commission; Business; Intervention (counseling); Law reform; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.041266140739274385,"score_gpt":0.3503199683947291,"score_spread":0.30905382765545475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516498904","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024113723,0.00824025,0.0029220325,0.94272846,0.00087612745,0.00004978168,0.000039173483,0.00004812015,0.04268466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31804028,0.038838707,0.012783978,0.5863745,0.007172108,0.00044285276,0.00018535525,0.000089468136,0.036072757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854907,0.00534262,0.0006117932,0.0012232783,0.0031890103,0.0041425917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9487784,0.034673706,0.0029826672,0.0028667608,0.006744722,0.003953837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02669756,0.0007617935,0.0012079587,0.0040283604,0.010422808,0.02503658,0.0046748864,0.03689234,0.014772355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0727587,0.00058207364,0.0011664646,0.0035383468,0.040596455,0.04220047,0.011325287,0.019463144,0.0025444622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014430323,0.00013142447,0.0004773738,0.00021122734,0.000016116897,0.00022794207,0.0019359535,0.0005723825,0.000115224626,0.92079824,0.046915144,0.028584553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006946494,0.0000567905,0.0006142406,0.0013488104,0.000029343515,0.00012886238,0.006980859,0.00087460695,0.00025046774,0.7652595,0.22433497,0.000051974763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072219305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052812103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072219305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01998236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06276839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14498287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516728616","doi":"10.3968/5226","title":"Study on Human Rights in Charity Activities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Ignorance; Conscience; Political science; Law; Variety (cybernetics); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.2790077746278651,"score_gpt":0.5581169405698471,"score_spread":0.279109165941982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516728616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41165257,0.01290482,0.0038015516,0.029793255,0.0004216026,0.00011743611,0.00006485419,0.000009732727,0.5412342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575303,0.010587346,0.00046142587,0.0012907329,0.00020071295,0.000042607007,0.000028848594,0.0000058800047,0.029852131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979102,0.001119701,0.000051707928,0.00015845895,0.00031542667,0.00044440702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99483395,0.0034812985,0.0005559076,0.000121253295,0.00046871774,0.00053879333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019999184,0.00016805335,0.00024773524,0.0014748289,0.0038495956,0.0042801695,0.0005398577,0.0011707972,0.0073933774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003012759,0.00010022396,0.00026291,0.002466847,0.0041477364,0.0047142194,0.0016662524,0.0020014923,0.0004927811],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034666737,0.00048852677,0.017228123,0.0004878154,0.000011658283,0.0011006076,0.08246053,0.00033223288,0.00036089375,0.8173709,0.010292237,0.06983178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013535796,0.00024566782,0.07173939,0.002410512,0.0000347214,0.001105798,0.3238221,0.0011698777,0.00079212553,0.14632435,0.45230612,0.00003576169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038519076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047599524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073933774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004598133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042196973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03336191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518131124","doi":"","title":"Legal Barriers to Innovation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Business; Exploit; Product (mathematics); Scale (ratio); State (computer science); Legal service; Service (business); Legal profession; Service provider; Public relations; Law and economics; Marketing; Law; Economics; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.016157647564763327,"score_gpt":0.35749626755486075,"score_spread":0.3413386199900974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518131124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06703238,0.0020860687,0.016130079,0.057646744,0.0002489582,0.00024944305,0.0001440078,0.00014150394,0.85632074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436467,0.001232261,0.004472297,0.010264959,0.00026571157,0.0005283286,0.00010070714,0.000061674335,0.039427403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.969983,0.008381894,0.002039259,0.0032279228,0.011264495,0.0051034135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8988223,0.073207825,0.00659796,0.006193409,0.010278914,0.0048995554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019325607,0.00031919326,0.00065489043,0.0029884598,0.007435759,0.012711537,0.0020577172,0.0076566194,0.025239022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07934586,0.0005458497,0.0009718529,0.001613651,0.0128365895,0.006354854,0.010995293,0.008426234,0.002370016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008169308,0.000044649492,0.001336109,0.000050941304,0.000006109107,0.00012113053,0.0025600416,0.00016079069,0.0002526492,0.9823167,0.003560133,0.009582682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006351755,0.00010882257,0.0056556487,0.0014660713,0.000037342998,0.00065216626,0.006325415,0.0011934014,0.000863541,0.5920872,0.3914914,0.000055412565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011292556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010609739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025239022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007615344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021834869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10220474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518760746","doi":"","title":"Winners and Losers in the Globalization of Legal Services: Offshoring the Market for Foreign Lawyers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; University of Southern California; Brigham Young University; Hamline University; University of Pittsburgh; St Mary's University; University of Connecticut; Georgetown University; University of Denver; Case Western Reserve University; University of Minnesota; Southern Methodist University; Wake Forest University; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Michigan State University; Emory University; Temple University; Valparaiso University; University of Pennsylvania; Santa Clara University; Vanderbilt University; York University; University of Miami; Northwestern University; Pennsylvania State University; Florida State University","keywords":"Offshoring; Globalization; Internationalization; Legal service; Legal education; Business; Offshore outsourcing; Legal profession; Staffing; Legal research; Practice of law; Law; Market economy; Political science; Outsourcing; International trade; Economics","score_opus":0.023916356763643336,"score_gpt":0.3519499048649326,"score_spread":0.32803354810128926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518760746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91757464,0.0006778176,0.00040931097,0.01548094,0.00011999986,0.000016205608,0.000025152667,0.000013233898,0.06568265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99555165,0.00028000982,0.000075984404,0.0007974345,0.00004714039,0.0000040370314,0.000015916537,0.000008862825,0.0032190534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689484,0.00095078006,0.00004959804,0.00026539527,0.000731904,0.0011075297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959865,0.0010797554,0.0009372836,0.00023263115,0.00037766172,0.001386147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046425397,0.00020699897,0.00039693434,0.0024399676,0.0064728973,0.009885543,0.0005552573,0.001411873,0.011609256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009205795,0.00021242467,0.000225529,0.0019631577,0.008251576,0.0090782875,0.008222955,0.002168411,0.0005266424],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037410052,0.00059162604,0.2745103,0.00011744246,0.000045821438,0.0020326385,0.14338629,0.00060567225,0.0015490752,0.28372094,0.028714132,0.26435193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037920607,0.0002597948,0.19501479,0.00020020304,0.00003472126,0.0004954499,0.67188686,0.0009811082,0.00079922716,0.037011757,0.09322837,0.00004982074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064107454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012234133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011609256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029057579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022609872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038836837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520056243","doi":"","title":"A Better Bar: Why and How the Existing Bar Exam Should Change","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.23955776567088924,"score_gpt":0.324527853239712,"score_spread":0.08497008756882277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520056243","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003821795,0.015156182,0.0072519146,0.8395803,0.04982462,0.00014215414,0.000311738,0.00078097964,0.08313033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10035383,0.024114491,0.027079688,0.5266133,0.04546309,0.00046452603,0.0011024422,0.0011670612,0.27364156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905668,0.0031285589,0.0005749473,0.0010267223,0.0032353143,0.0014676676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752381,0.0065039895,0.0013031279,0.001511744,0.009628388,0.005814605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0155414585,0.0006818385,0.0004894527,0.0017683853,0.003343207,0.010114678,0.0025571221,0.010921152,0.04555977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047643896,0.00047092314,0.0007358901,0.0009939423,0.0055371122,0.012950683,0.0030431529,0.012173306,0.024849106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043472653,0.000119894896,0.0015437225,0.00020103871,0.000007635879,0.00016148954,0.0006351435,0.00012957957,0.00037252367,0.038112298,0.8304562,0.1282171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028975317,0.0001570386,0.007463478,0.0012025889,0.000011826699,0.0005283601,0.002140935,0.0003085582,0.00041067883,0.027795516,0.9598727,0.00007927899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010606817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018303972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04555977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004793436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053688344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1524126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521250136","doi":"","title":"Can Good Character Be Made Better? Assessing the Federation of Law Societies’ Proposed Reform of the Good Character Requirement for Law Society Admission","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Law; Political science; Russian federation; Process (computing); Moral character; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.034883224098858405,"score_gpt":0.3473739367756783,"score_spread":0.3124907126768199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521250136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5672752,0.0022159398,0.03657171,0.22013639,0.0026810342,0.0016580247,0.0002364291,0.00024122174,0.16898406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628924,0.00022450733,0.020120481,0.012240156,0.00039332916,0.00045839776,0.00007002151,0.00002417189,0.0035764955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8375148,0.075405374,0.013711675,0.009976873,0.039457604,0.023933647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82073176,0.053734526,0.031420097,0.020030638,0.05267275,0.02141032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15183924,0.0005239687,0.0015592604,0.0058701476,0.012596105,0.019271007,0.0050401674,0.014829529,0.002829727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24847302,0.0008878113,0.002304372,0.0031521388,0.01510039,0.014016333,0.018772794,0.010158529,0.0005799919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057982275,0.0012348589,0.13351335,0.00081351126,0.00038517133,0.0008123422,0.019333145,0.0067588584,0.0031270129,0.6833791,0.028628118,0.121434666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007244934,0.004706826,0.46048078,0.002778507,0.0012564146,0.001179868,0.04071039,0.024927657,0.008336296,0.25354797,0.19999701,0.0013538257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019500667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031634174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15183924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017707238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06628556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80301225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521382258","doi":"","title":"Educational Visit to the Commonwealth Judicial Education Institute, Halifax, Canada (8-28 June, 2008): Some Observations and Suggestions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Political science; Law; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.018341912373118253,"score_gpt":0.3195814762594732,"score_spread":0.3012395638863549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521382258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.310058,0.0068649147,0.001687871,0.26636627,0.0062791402,0.00090523664,0.005957709,0.0012679549,0.40061298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30079207,0.0037399037,0.0023835576,0.019637309,0.00046195296,0.00015620464,0.0013774872,0.0003638891,0.6710877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992899,0.0001310676,0.0000127575995,0.00004664605,0.0001436187,0.00037599404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728775,0.00021603932,0.00008756576,0.000054041673,0.0008823946,0.001472244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014091791,0.00034575636,0.00025606502,0.00092202384,0.01988215,0.003050673,0.0012702643,0.001985249,0.042434026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022597783,0.0003835374,0.00023986815,0.0013152149,0.0016082802,0.0015464606,0.001707509,0.0034046082,0.006612166],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003008173,0.00043866129,0.03370286,0.00016894046,0.000009800074,0.0054000737,0.049322348,0.00014209698,0.0016032316,0.0023271113,0.8578586,0.048725415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021719961,0.00012647914,0.11620618,0.00020464516,0.000009170798,0.0005241944,0.10857233,0.000119513126,0.00045383984,0.00021114512,0.7734709,0.00007989264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71399635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9343039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28600365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011088724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013278222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5753759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522179030","doi":"","title":"Legal Infrastructure and the New Economy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic law; Business; Recession; Market economy; Economics; Economy","score_opus":0.017783015817966475,"score_gpt":0.2728183504704039,"score_spread":0.25503533465243744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522179030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04634283,0.00902884,0.006038179,0.072209455,0.00031505196,0.000041114687,0.00010978648,0.00008905257,0.86582565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95331484,0.0064669913,0.0018621071,0.0050009144,0.00057945854,0.000064558895,0.00011309,0.00003665876,0.03256138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971397,0.0008739046,0.00010520388,0.00038346928,0.00081804267,0.0006796455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952958,0.0018834249,0.0007645566,0.0005135805,0.0006797179,0.00086287386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023522647,0.00017909882,0.00025660635,0.0025752417,0.004296586,0.007937089,0.0010146135,0.0023275642,0.0151336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062994165,0.00019358344,0.00025057874,0.0021797805,0.022513345,0.011124599,0.0057888874,0.0035297812,0.0010429244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017630468,0.000006409771,0.00017026435,0.000010912209,0.0000010995136,0.000033849206,0.0005761394,0.00011138693,0.000019042285,0.9937563,0.0015323908,0.0037803755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012439539,0.00002048021,0.0017614692,0.00024862145,0.0000047924864,0.00015787449,0.0023291064,0.0007090727,0.00008943716,0.70641685,0.2882307,0.00001924323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010115385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008122323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0151336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009155038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006995835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06642473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526980196","doi":"","title":"Adopting Regulatory Objectives for the Legal Profession","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Regulatory reform; Context (archaeology); Regulatory authority; Political science; Law; Legal profession; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.03949082283057709,"score_gpt":0.364787834994338,"score_spread":0.3252970121637609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526980196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016615825,0.0030835555,0.070356034,0.08620078,0.0032410657,0.0013554038,0.00042943246,0.00058359856,0.81813425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45745328,0.0059397477,0.17969106,0.120055765,0.0019286912,0.00395406,0.0012252805,0.0006343518,0.22911772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91684186,0.024296641,0.00550003,0.004925444,0.041647658,0.006788354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9248155,0.015539221,0.006546138,0.0056041665,0.04374114,0.003753904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05531623,0.0007479399,0.00053841836,0.0033997016,0.007433039,0.0207443,0.002863137,0.012802054,0.0048327846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06593416,0.0010450134,0.0015335951,0.0016645954,0.016066236,0.011180946,0.011008554,0.017170029,0.003491105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008785701,0.00007398545,0.0007618662,0.0001340359,0.0000043576733,0.000045666915,0.0034648483,0.0003335832,0.0004275333,0.9549718,0.021278676,0.018494816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041547726,0.00014478034,0.0038626192,0.001667549,0.000030096053,0.00021823164,0.004504624,0.0008742987,0.0019094674,0.11383988,0.87276393,0.0001429831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036997978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039428186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05531623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016220523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07715322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29254365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530569893","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001474","title":"Canadian Legal Ethics: Ready for the Twenty-First Century at Last","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal ethics; Political science; Legal education; Legal profession; Legal realism; Law; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Public administration","score_opus":0.07947018377858342,"score_gpt":0.3855986025917223,"score_spread":0.3061284188131389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530569893","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012805301,0.09828889,0.002218443,0.71269387,0.0043634265,0.000025256426,0.00020451886,0.00009943689,0.16930096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6260279,0.10025629,0.007103437,0.09863386,0.002681973,0.000087352186,0.00029041935,0.00018372187,0.16473508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98730266,0.0020055005,0.00021054097,0.00079237693,0.0069522667,0.0027366611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98409677,0.0015441367,0.00046606417,0.00046469917,0.008949857,0.0044784723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066224257,0.0005975794,0.00070973026,0.0030628373,0.02189294,0.018376656,0.001859094,0.005206517,0.007098922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012887662,0.00030300344,0.0004004089,0.0052872794,0.043091625,0.006058674,0.004437507,0.006392387,0.00069479697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027762238,0.000020807436,0.0018776794,0.00018689566,0.000012090002,0.00017941897,0.02446917,0.0002196355,0.0001690877,0.7381185,0.17604437,0.058674548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005952954,0.000006643762,0.0024441876,0.0003310351,0.000008645199,0.000070413684,0.011598923,0.000109085886,0.000079276266,0.03936941,0.94594884,0.000027636313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97992843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75025207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24974795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39926374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87018603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530583193","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics and Moral Character","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Legal ethics; Moral character; Action (physics); Embodied cognition; Law; Sociology; Normative ethics; Epistemology; Legal realism; Political science; Psychology; Legal research; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03412451724597068,"score_gpt":0.37859109250384204,"score_spread":0.3444665752578714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530583193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017900903,0.010837795,0.0185451,0.10170211,0.0008126095,0.00005003251,0.000061334154,0.00006114195,0.850029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9247202,0.0034877262,0.0075709443,0.011449083,0.0017551376,0.00012821825,0.000066406436,0.00009715959,0.050725065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917368,0.005177921,0.00025122866,0.0009268927,0.001252637,0.00065452186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99190825,0.00456654,0.0008290552,0.0009906994,0.000981946,0.00072357524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006345232,0.0004491874,0.0005000605,0.0015376111,0.0064666346,0.011734383,0.001218798,0.0059869806,0.007890178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010719582,0.00029091426,0.00034221954,0.0009852336,0.053857323,0.008397558,0.004788077,0.0056391163,0.0013830371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011940061,0.000003773465,0.000062842824,0.000008908987,0.0000010008923,0.000010266335,0.00069605495,0.000033411976,0.000014723387,0.9964478,0.001162757,0.0015572978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039276197,0.0000049456007,0.00012659137,0.000055394783,0.0000012694184,0.000041310082,0.0007038343,0.00014683961,0.000030626874,0.94947225,0.049408942,0.0000040949517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001492106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011087075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011734383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00573238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036437619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041591465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531778298","doi":"","title":"Curious Judge: Judicial Notice of Facts, Independent Judicial Research, and the Impact of the Internet","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Law; Political science; Adversarial system; Judicial discretion; Legislature; Jury; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05047184387397196,"score_gpt":0.4231476266124623,"score_spread":0.37267578273849034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531778298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020471225,0.025559688,0.013848751,0.33412337,0.0018047737,0.00009380078,0.00008746954,0.00014642387,0.60386443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8370681,0.0199599,0.0047355066,0.07093497,0.004581169,0.00019265777,0.000065774875,0.00012559695,0.062336348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735782,0.014168226,0.00083515083,0.003046739,0.0059346384,0.002437109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9116336,0.07511959,0.0042495076,0.0036740948,0.003504863,0.0018183145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020514647,0.00031411645,0.0005987019,0.0033480201,0.011287632,0.023846911,0.0030614645,0.021723164,0.010240198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07167669,0.00053551194,0.00065513136,0.0041705454,0.034697834,0.023027264,0.0077886353,0.015907437,0.0010487485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063020084,0.000007143332,0.00013108204,0.000017932747,0.0000021069563,0.00007320731,0.0011232649,0.00005443715,0.000024027833,0.9886812,0.0059561417,0.0039230403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000375875,0.000037056,0.0013947695,0.0005244846,0.000031428903,0.00021489906,0.0032106524,0.0008090676,0.00045322257,0.7491969,0.24404077,0.000049194186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01582973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019742629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023846911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010047957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010765137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10849315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532119940","doi":"","title":"Great beyond his knowing : Morton Horwitz's influence on legal education and scholarship in England, Canada and Australia.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; New england; Political science; Economic history; Sociology; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.02251340774124961,"score_gpt":0.2930263709727716,"score_spread":0.270512963231522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532119940","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097722486,0.10043965,0.00058532075,0.5453749,0.00605315,0.000063410145,0.000073165895,0.000055788747,0.24963216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7734352,0.02398457,0.00043962526,0.04829576,0.0010478192,0.000043476644,0.000023810471,0.00010301286,0.1526268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918576,0.0022422005,0.00012532537,0.0005417075,0.002780005,0.0024531633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875771,0.004308395,0.00047020844,0.0002793054,0.0034884706,0.0038765348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00588335,0.0003273071,0.0005060529,0.0020058993,0.03658396,0.01061369,0.0020530587,0.005629278,0.0031772824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015079086,0.0004502321,0.00022530182,0.0028388156,0.036160488,0.005362045,0.006502347,0.0073217177,0.00044927088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042134165,0.000058899703,0.0022894451,0.00013434824,0.00000880431,0.000986217,0.30392683,0.00017846633,0.00021460152,0.43221435,0.21979561,0.04015035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072768794,0.00001619245,0.0067560496,0.0003117235,0.000005074638,0.00017769626,0.077553615,0.000105887826,0.00014862308,0.015257892,0.89959747,0.00006249206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94521594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96207446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084890075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084890075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12920906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6159235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532443611","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1222","title":"Counting Outsiders: A Critical Exploration of Outsider Course Enrollment in Canadian Legal Education","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Calgary; University of Victoria; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Diversity (politics); Identity (music); Sociology; Critical theory; Power (physics); Qualitative property; Higher education; Political science; Law; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.05629451319101359,"score_gpt":0.4259443052658645,"score_spread":0.36964979207485094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532443611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9372258,0.000734442,0.0022095481,0.015347824,0.0001705338,0.00022368412,0.00027192634,0.00007157868,0.04374466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99205834,0.00041939717,0.0008369374,0.0013829968,0.00004264112,0.00009462692,0.00007927848,0.000042071253,0.0050437935],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97809803,0.006750787,0.00059069914,0.0020341878,0.007844871,0.0046813963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95474637,0.02647256,0.0029841568,0.0012327563,0.010674392,0.003889781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020927122,0.00071210833,0.0007851117,0.013364765,0.041246805,0.013536052,0.0054698195,0.0022048748,0.0032110251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056502465,0.00072992337,0.00041010173,0.014404713,0.020957094,0.006110279,0.011479035,0.004605448,0.0001443398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010029553,0.000019967065,0.009889435,0.00003958655,0.0000027782432,0.00023796778,0.9688913,0.000025808271,0.00028440708,0.006083148,0.0020269398,0.012488626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014754473,0.000015503227,0.022015853,0.00010608303,0.000005138999,0.00007564419,0.9543711,0.00016996214,0.0002116373,0.0007395242,0.02225446,0.00003376149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8991627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95122737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8945467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10545332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0887988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.765121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533215818","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1208","title":"In the Public Interest': The Responsibilities and Rights of Government Lawyers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Government (linguistics); Legal ethics; Private rights; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Public interest; Professional ethics; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09554534998777726,"score_gpt":0.3537097210419768,"score_spread":0.25816437105419954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533215818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09870358,0.004308371,0.01731986,0.3136261,0.0007780955,0.00006028695,0.00003929421,0.00009613077,0.56506824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628188,0.0006541898,0.0018782516,0.009802952,0.00024295754,0.00004445967,0.000011411285,0.000031993306,0.024514927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97722274,0.014368776,0.00046958108,0.0012431364,0.003361414,0.003334282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98006433,0.011475296,0.0018697665,0.0022143356,0.0020687932,0.0023074404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016873231,0.00024035922,0.00038619226,0.0008809915,0.009893877,0.01342043,0.0011834647,0.008166756,0.0059529115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031248622,0.00040776684,0.00029221884,0.00069830625,0.034900397,0.00997219,0.0072741765,0.009354149,0.0010673866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012597838,0.00004319921,0.0011613921,0.00001972599,0.000004169906,0.00013654827,0.035387848,0.000066140776,0.00020044249,0.93894017,0.008898229,0.015129472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004116038,0.000059357153,0.003124423,0.00035543562,0.00001542908,0.00053081743,0.038401365,0.0004638919,0.00058358134,0.7280954,0.22828928,0.00003977582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004995551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051259417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016873231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004246853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0140849855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08923519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534108637","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511547348.020","title":"The Teaching of Professionalism: Vignettes for Discussion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.07309927618922991,"score_gpt":0.45375036807861646,"score_spread":0.38065109188938656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534108637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.560281,0.0050381613,0.020452412,0.25167394,0.0043028174,0.002660173,0.0006840609,0.00019961405,0.1547079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8980752,0.007874878,0.024317855,0.019439751,0.0010720046,0.00338364,0.0004248421,0.00009108424,0.045320727],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99365133,0.005179303,0.00014799967,0.00011026968,0.00045782074,0.0004533054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893741,0.008362264,0.0004995227,0.00019218825,0.00057503016,0.0009968717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049131745,0.0004978134,0.00039944495,0.0011145062,0.006627305,0.0024450715,0.0014731782,0.006058521,0.008350391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025527436,0.00034701067,0.0003319843,0.0018802673,0.0025687327,0.003048132,0.0028829735,0.0054139155,0.0009646174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000446014,0.0015577732,0.0035561286,0.0014005118,0.000023651515,0.02304467,0.58517206,0.0012277521,0.0018895429,0.13338861,0.18443699,0.063856274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014759977,0.00033617124,0.006824698,0.0015760674,0.000021271979,0.015058233,0.4435865,0.0021352202,0.002130539,0.016719755,0.511306,0.00015792888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043210676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008034487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008350391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035125448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014323272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02793485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535247808","doi":"","title":"An Annotated Bibliography of Law Review Articles Addressing Feminist Perspectives in 'Law in Literature'","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliography; Annotated bibliography; Perspective (graphical); Feminism; Inclusion (mineral); Law and literature; Sociology; Law; Political science; Library science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04675471430054226,"score_gpt":0.41999453177696416,"score_spread":0.3732398174764219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535247808","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062894856,0.89886206,0.0019570475,0.017928055,0.018103627,0.00022297214,0.0023990953,0.0001777967,0.059720382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00779019,0.877598,0.005981037,0.013439019,0.011845984,0.00077583647,0.004261263,0.00014760304,0.078161076],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997621,0.0006718058,0.00032933685,0.00017670465,0.0010497393,0.00015136649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98764753,0.0066852295,0.0009077516,0.00022198046,0.0041873776,0.00035005758],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022637888,0.0008671015,0.0014238172,0.033056412,0.0023743585,0.0031386393,0.000980146,0.0018776532,0.045746468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011058422,0.0004608147,0.00059678796,0.044860918,0.001155451,0.003139196,0.001475223,0.0014952346,0.0105186645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017511842,0.000014817076,0.000099956575,0.006062942,0.000016391454,0.00016390867,0.0006593332,0.000089605535,0.00023201668,0.003916137,0.8717031,0.11702426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034165841,0.00000857259,0.00065061793,0.008393198,0.0000134021075,0.00009794159,0.00034499663,0.000018183287,0.00003887964,0.0009137688,0.98950875,0.000008195677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00851286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030299192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96694356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040902817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005992187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15303719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536860436","doi":"10.1002/9780470713013.ch3","title":"Assessment for Classification of Women Offenders","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08006599439641748,"score_gpt":0.43829332787433967,"score_spread":0.3582273334779222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536860436","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17535864,0.011180663,0.4136917,0.04405712,0.00392641,0.0054803905,0.015638484,0.0020803637,0.3285862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65140766,0.007910192,0.24064134,0.0022000012,0.00085819204,0.0031333528,0.0062128287,0.00034699883,0.08728948],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937093,0.0025631909,0.00047895318,0.00034717645,0.0026341975,0.00026718716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868138,0.0035240143,0.0017316443,0.0009390911,0.0064459713,0.00054548285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012347858,0.000892261,0.0008021459,0.0042230845,0.0008654193,0.0025264842,0.0027490493,0.0008726352,0.019970533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03667878,0.0002800299,0.000837295,0.0016458522,0.0005610783,0.0031980674,0.0016597647,0.0013213049,0.0047183353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027859668,0.00034250953,0.15172292,0.00040793527,0.000067879686,0.00012888477,0.00089498836,0.0022737607,0.0005037628,0.017946033,0.082878895,0.7425538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020592658,0.002140047,0.5266814,0.006587869,0.00037222294,0.0027456302,0.009944911,0.074885346,0.0069912313,0.10736549,0.2617896,0.00029028897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057333144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01405448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019970533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001814886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035096833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066808105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537348723","doi":"10.22329/celt.v6i0.3736","title":"5. Transcending Boundaries in Legal Education: A Vehicle for Teaching Students to Think Critically","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Curriculum; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Politics; State (computer science); Agile software development; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.017202568324946644,"score_gpt":0.38642919440493895,"score_spread":0.3692266260799923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537348723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2894086,0.0016999468,0.07659604,0.070438184,0.00074997876,0.00041396395,0.000050894258,0.00047050847,0.56017184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9178426,0.0006638115,0.035027113,0.00708382,0.00009608546,0.00022689061,0.000024074503,0.00007872082,0.038956936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969112,0.001906876,0.000082427774,0.00018579405,0.00053345616,0.00038018226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481,0.002537076,0.00057499454,0.00033240684,0.0007293042,0.0010161663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037869988,0.00031355605,0.00014913952,0.0008288393,0.004491134,0.0073099886,0.00092716585,0.0025737283,0.0066726753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073166904,0.00015971932,0.0002913373,0.00035586482,0.011003728,0.0053552156,0.005699486,0.004187341,0.0015249699],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029128134,0.00034318055,0.0055362326,0.00030852246,0.00000623795,0.00076834497,0.35516125,0.00061980926,0.0050748726,0.4661371,0.022709519,0.14330581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047799807,0.00026692316,0.005039599,0.0012924295,0.000015710388,0.0006399183,0.21403444,0.0020336611,0.0073935655,0.24833497,0.52084124,0.000059790345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003913775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009509389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073099886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003920272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066335453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028443694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537590232","doi":"10.4324/9780203063941","title":"Public Sector Ethics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public sector; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.48324476909776365,"score_gpt":0.46447903864214474,"score_spread":0.018765730455618912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537590232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061088,0.012523707,0.004757627,0.0858927,0.0026505725,0.00007207696,0.00005476485,0.00006800935,0.8933697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08961886,0.014528477,0.008030341,0.044824604,0.0039761662,0.0003150265,0.00011423821,0.0002609896,0.8383313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941147,0.0030534798,0.0002549473,0.0005122062,0.0015820101,0.00048272742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99385023,0.0035885596,0.00028153378,0.00061334117,0.0012048936,0.000461396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005556745,0.0007781727,0.00067015825,0.0013125845,0.0064391694,0.014158789,0.001112255,0.009005463,0.023773061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00898115,0.00044656004,0.0003451265,0.002209466,0.02551511,0.009587585,0.003916542,0.009467711,0.007407637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010328108,0.000008155046,0.000019567267,0.00002022428,6.8640253e-7,0.00000894076,0.0010179828,0.00003835428,0.000010448882,0.9211022,0.07067155,0.0071008704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022465013,0.0000023447765,0.00004290353,0.00017035853,7.9979486e-7,0.000019694908,0.0007447266,0.00006195296,0.000019890345,0.35171553,0.6472165,0.0000031544716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010015007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0127084665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023773061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011064655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016026372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080280006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539176873","doi":"","title":"Meeting the Professional Identity Challenge in Legal Education Through a Relationship-Centered Experiential Curriculum","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Baltimore law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Legal education; Experiential learning; Curriculum; Identity (music); Normative; Experiential education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Legal profession; Engineering ethics; Civility; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.087556430134911,"score_gpt":0.3748586248068578,"score_spread":0.2873021946719468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539176873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65300965,0.002070696,0.103523,0.059734866,0.00080111594,0.000948462,0.000046174162,0.000606206,0.17925976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91731316,0.0015366197,0.055501744,0.006020577,0.00017259692,0.0006545017,0.000040444866,0.000058453497,0.01870182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961725,0.0022588249,0.00009766549,0.00027811882,0.000657628,0.0005353723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99475855,0.0013444051,0.00035201132,0.00038731573,0.00024883324,0.0029089584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055824607,0.0004427033,0.00024791577,0.000736934,0.003824393,0.0064544072,0.0025612654,0.0024118677,0.0052642645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006158205,0.00032970984,0.0004188404,0.00036808892,0.007561398,0.0049339007,0.008897324,0.004794141,0.0013176887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102770966,0.014255786,0.011311283,0.0008297426,0.000023050226,0.001311724,0.17685103,0.0025502576,0.009806362,0.43278623,0.03031001,0.3198618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026681751,0.003362543,0.016360877,0.0015121909,0.000040058807,0.0038253963,0.1597512,0.009336791,0.009513854,0.37828618,0.41759586,0.00014828936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006060154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015324544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064544072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021142222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011313909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029523253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539327783","doi":"","title":"TIME FOR CHANGE: UNETHICAL HOURLY BILLING IN THE CANADIAN PROFESSION AND WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT IT","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Temptation; Dishonesty; Inefficiency; Work (physics); Business; Language change; Political science; Public relations; Law; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09421003923449742,"score_gpt":0.41636925998776697,"score_spread":0.3221592207532695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539327783","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08981195,0.011187768,0.0032972945,0.7349399,0.0014651881,0.00007851391,0.00006947296,0.00008156163,0.15906838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88657,0.008287752,0.0026742402,0.07606404,0.00036300026,0.000042904514,0.000028864317,0.0000685781,0.025900658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96919966,0.0063346587,0.000606762,0.0014772145,0.0135964975,0.008785276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9672733,0.0111789415,0.0042916182,0.0013203825,0.010375985,0.0055597336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017367428,0.0004321243,0.00057954213,0.0017729349,0.042628206,0.016115602,0.0037771196,0.012597961,0.005134408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05772297,0.000498191,0.00057981425,0.0036323399,0.062073104,0.007145163,0.0050548012,0.01485408,0.0005078268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007148857,0.00009362894,0.010946226,0.00029703163,0.0000331954,0.0009035889,0.19824548,0.00060248515,0.00064361485,0.5712866,0.10164398,0.11523265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050171766,0.00007424191,0.03377062,0.0016738354,0.00006629207,0.0005862785,0.27275833,0.0014560166,0.00079068466,0.094325095,0.59401405,0.00043435596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96561915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86276835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13723165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25595325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542569290","doi":"10.1177/1037969x1303800203","title":"REDISCOVERING LAW STUDENTS AS CITIZENS Critical thinking and the public value of legal education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Value (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Feeling; Legal profession; Sociology; Work (physics); Public administration; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.010581178017419684,"score_gpt":0.3157180920256678,"score_spread":0.3051369140082481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542569290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41544282,0.0077050226,0.0076353503,0.2592552,0.0019266127,0.00011776396,0.00001618766,0.00016111306,0.30774003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97360396,0.0012875381,0.00080973253,0.012262844,0.00035734367,0.00003552768,0.000004941704,0.000052659907,0.011585539],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98511976,0.010116588,0.00027251223,0.00064754224,0.0021031222,0.001740393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732521,0.017613588,0.0025676999,0.0012820275,0.0017777331,0.003506846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01533199,0.00036654674,0.000463345,0.0021103837,0.01343046,0.022781363,0.0014573184,0.0058003785,0.003950481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023347879,0.00040053643,0.00033528268,0.0013993457,0.08355619,0.014940908,0.013179706,0.013104975,0.0006532572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001540947,0.00012527316,0.001645807,0.00007460225,0.000005204996,0.00029638273,0.5792913,0.00005602765,0.00041467385,0.38951015,0.008919692,0.01964554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029123466,0.00010427476,0.0016522164,0.00049498613,0.000009231832,0.0004487859,0.44576064,0.0004152285,0.0009961869,0.2942316,0.25581163,0.00004612238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041563665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050192303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022781363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00835994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01009486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08108425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543191960","doi":"","title":"Law Stretched Thin: Access to Justice in Rural America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rural area; Economic Justice; Practice of law; Poverty; Political science; Population; Legal education; Economic growth; Law; Legal profession; Sociology","score_opus":0.025201652322548417,"score_gpt":0.3862328077802175,"score_spread":0.3610311554576691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543191960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58911204,0.0068938765,0.0017522783,0.2241597,0.00053799065,0.00006078552,0.00010127834,0.000036882877,0.17734504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724077,0.0049956148,0.0003463313,0.013650638,0.00018509841,0.000034478177,0.000029298386,0.000019907146,0.008330953],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984646,0.00066048745,0.000038175658,0.00013672089,0.00018997173,0.00051000685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666154,0.0012806206,0.0004947189,0.000088858695,0.00036178756,0.0011125366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014833885,0.0001289364,0.00022423435,0.00089134707,0.014815974,0.0053866673,0.0012181278,0.0021567938,0.010177503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052297497,0.00017234382,0.00014608513,0.001505304,0.0087872,0.005068376,0.009710131,0.004666389,0.00031133747],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024710778,0.0001605043,0.022161137,0.0002638736,0.000015669842,0.0031866883,0.7582795,0.000097015276,0.0009941639,0.116477646,0.024800753,0.073538326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005963448,0.00007774462,0.01992369,0.0005537366,0.000009218382,0.00084369065,0.7836194,0.00014582483,0.00009075512,0.016776647,0.17793101,0.000022308368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041257568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12198855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041257568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043082316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007494504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08203483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544282991","doi":"10.53300/001c.5608","title":"Dr John Kearney QC AM and the role of philanthropy in legal education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Generosity; Legal education; Political science; Law; Sociology; Management; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02070498761656456,"score_gpt":0.3705289617718886,"score_spread":0.349823974155324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544282991","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00084216613,0.087559566,0.000321391,0.8700857,0.013071731,0.000016594347,0.000021713733,0.000016644146,0.02806445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07636355,0.12143109,0.0013514349,0.55411184,0.029776389,0.000113373244,0.000047474947,0.000083397754,0.21672145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98864007,0.004137866,0.00052851177,0.0011783199,0.0045812554,0.00093398837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709338,0.0147378035,0.0019835334,0.0005686401,0.00793197,0.0038442377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008890343,0.0003155034,0.0005511364,0.0009727788,0.0059292195,0.0071898554,0.0013374704,0.015401245,0.01740848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04249347,0.0003751075,0.0003163413,0.001251765,0.0046945605,0.0059724436,0.002724586,0.016364034,0.0025185319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024697214,0.000021013591,0.0005798142,0.00034157842,0.000008240255,0.00013256818,0.00052284874,0.00008113504,0.00015502631,0.0852591,0.86405635,0.048817605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007747497,0.000021424641,0.0008456576,0.00046864452,0.0000070236997,0.00018031662,0.00058382074,0.000070759634,0.00013675394,0.005875418,0.9917829,0.00001944812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043762106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0842928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043762106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005950087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019039746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087014794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544385193","doi":"","title":"Teaching Sexual Assault: The Education of Canadian Law Students","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Political science; Sexual violence; Obligation; Curriculum; Sociology; Criminology; Criminal law; Politics; Criminal justice; Psychology","score_opus":0.016948275801160227,"score_gpt":0.37647646333254775,"score_spread":0.35952818753138754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544385193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9195498,0.003445652,0.00027841658,0.032980077,0.000695928,0.00022596048,0.0001788678,0.000043990814,0.04260119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710986,0.0036776296,0.00048480052,0.004650086,0.00006387999,0.00005226183,0.00012756693,0.000023368211,0.019821802],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619895,0.0004595661,0.00006270902,0.00022240338,0.0010834761,0.0019728416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908761,0.0003670577,0.00041771893,0.000066006185,0.0013158314,0.0069572767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026729691,0.0005276748,0.00047828586,0.0021256164,0.033846717,0.0070908493,0.0026547003,0.0030092471,0.010332555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066410056,0.0007577759,0.00048704838,0.0024047089,0.005085156,0.002104248,0.0042306334,0.004994605,0.0005536323],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001587016,0.0027670597,0.13163668,0.00047322092,0.000027850303,0.00269062,0.6311849,0.0003346628,0.0032381597,0.009804809,0.051150307,0.16653301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006783445,0.0006375609,0.13669126,0.0007351653,0.000026086103,0.0011928894,0.64131105,0.00036178977,0.0009781305,0.00087676087,0.21697076,0.0001507484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96727866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077366844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077366844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15693249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56133837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544813641","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500001190","title":"Bringing Legal Education to the Canadian Arctic: the Development of the Akitsiraq Law School and the Challenges for Providing Library Services to a Non-traditional Law School","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"The arctic; Arctic; Economic Justice; Legal education; Law; Political science; Sociology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.02447517598327833,"score_gpt":0.3059408628362984,"score_spread":0.2814656868530201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544813641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41827837,0.004361701,0.0017784187,0.26789925,0.0010147145,0.0004909477,0.00025840092,0.00022531296,0.30569285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8769061,0.0031650367,0.004372527,0.019866891,0.000118939235,0.0001300796,0.00013511594,0.00010477488,0.09520059],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99415094,0.0011563303,0.00009553436,0.00032254626,0.0015902703,0.002684275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97833234,0.0012513166,0.0004473319,0.00021585931,0.0069950996,0.012757958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007355572,0.00028620145,0.000329521,0.0022252304,0.05207691,0.013741816,0.0033387125,0.0029602847,0.017360218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008154124,0.00049379584,0.00033165343,0.0026099898,0.009310901,0.0044247154,0.007770684,0.005030454,0.0013687192],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017356026,0.0010308906,0.053769533,0.00055142876,0.00003591973,0.0056586624,0.35297555,0.0006816591,0.002270448,0.12812893,0.17938882,0.2753346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027580874,0.00009735913,0.03403924,0.0004676265,0.000018855793,0.00037208165,0.34178945,0.00043501746,0.0005133571,0.0031444896,0.61900115,0.000093760165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9806625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90575325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09424677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47575855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68381137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545203131","doi":"","title":"Judges and Their Editors","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Craft; Law; Pride; Political science; Judicial opinion; Economic Justice; Sociology; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.05403533965330897,"score_gpt":0.39658424178053403,"score_spread":0.34254890212722505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545203131","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012569097,0.039672248,0.0015389923,0.33819875,0.41339594,0.00008994639,0.00017500184,0.00022844231,0.20544383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041383967,0.031140978,0.0019790647,0.096934244,0.25797364,0.00014363792,0.00028899722,0.00032466315,0.5698308],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97738326,0.0057176105,0.0014684163,0.0022604542,0.010854961,0.002315322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94091445,0.015184174,0.0034599947,0.0039413217,0.027118832,0.00938126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014459393,0.0009118319,0.00092674233,0.0030585187,0.0071955654,0.018038325,0.0021869838,0.005989399,0.042641148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10232015,0.0006942476,0.00051057345,0.0020092824,0.0057525886,0.007270173,0.0041806395,0.0097136395,0.026124738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107839505,0.00000789853,0.000120387165,0.000060186147,0.000002828088,0.000052792606,0.0005250548,0.00002430683,0.00007089727,0.030472046,0.94681066,0.021842096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034102306,0.00000415359,0.00009587795,0.00007572616,0.0000021501635,0.000030190202,0.0002746448,0.00001457289,0.00003087059,0.0037988534,0.9956657,0.0000038347375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023659484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004949686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042641148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005216846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012146329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14264882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545767087","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1640533","title":"Comparing and Understanding Legal Aid Priorities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06590970118146412,"score_gpt":0.3586344765920743,"score_spread":0.2927247754106102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545767087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86365354,0.0008380556,0.005248724,0.009982051,0.00007278491,0.00011871712,0.0003657268,0.000040160776,0.11968024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754214,0.00018825458,0.0012734049,0.00014290314,0.000007876391,0.000019546154,0.00007851526,0.000007844824,0.000739553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.987043,0.0069729425,0.0007226544,0.0007319619,0.0022139389,0.0023154465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9376753,0.043521035,0.0068145273,0.0010554158,0.0070594726,0.0038743117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018842017,0.00030610268,0.00046122583,0.00941862,0.004159067,0.011717938,0.0018459624,0.0016257524,0.010695019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079534374,0.00049537304,0.00030344343,0.006142061,0.0032346423,0.015359174,0.0050423965,0.002354188,0.0006084139],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040511315,0.00045237748,0.32922396,0.00061010337,0.00013241908,0.0005843608,0.10632327,0.003200746,0.00082162843,0.38758,0.007905865,0.16276011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080447826,0.00023777792,0.20893084,0.00078059314,0.00014027768,0.00018318136,0.47176355,0.008123636,0.0016847654,0.2687012,0.039264146,0.00010957046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023857389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041887656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023857389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010477863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01040257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09964728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546336473","doi":"","title":"Beyond Provincialism: Canadian Law Societies and the Protection of Human Rights Abroad","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Human rights; Political science; Law; International human rights law; Promotion (chess); Rule of law; International law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.044824019201623905,"score_gpt":0.2819046835104659,"score_spread":0.23708066430884198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546336473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122449875,0.0052564703,0.0019181867,0.19382143,0.001228192,0.000093821305,0.00013554959,0.00006426352,0.67503214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87986684,0.0029701635,0.0011939353,0.0167318,0.000110315385,0.000025636291,0.000079238795,0.000038946262,0.098983176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934956,0.0009768412,0.000087038345,0.0003549886,0.0020058511,0.00307969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99092543,0.0012241703,0.0005607165,0.00027935475,0.0023720323,0.0046382276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035835207,0.00028419454,0.00025401902,0.0017183839,0.04258963,0.015280423,0.0017289757,0.0036557678,0.011936699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008093945,0.00029197795,0.00032676084,0.003078481,0.01609058,0.0046876343,0.008586975,0.0055105286,0.0005070113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002140439,0.000045252815,0.01022955,0.00014113111,0.000012867762,0.00096523913,0.14169098,0.00026061927,0.00025019702,0.68896973,0.0973711,0.06004202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000865132,0.000013792255,0.01319557,0.0003027309,0.000016471537,0.00021511131,0.13402335,0.0003175176,0.00014673012,0.019190159,0.83252406,0.00004584988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.979254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98991054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10192904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10192904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27753916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7395504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546627872","doi":"","title":"Problématiques juridiques des logiciels libres et ouverts : défis et solutions pour le gouvernement du Québec (RESOLL)","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.08213550339714303,"score_gpt":0.3865021566930917,"score_spread":0.30436665329594864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546627872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14297616,0.03729992,0.043345675,0.28166354,0.0016454655,0.0008587105,0.002309288,0.0007660285,0.48913515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6394711,0.015176979,0.024650566,0.013818015,0.00034534777,0.00033404073,0.0012281813,0.00024361176,0.30473217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98846674,0.0029001588,0.0004934078,0.0012322747,0.0054127844,0.0014946223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732362,0.0070688752,0.0014609117,0.001158118,0.015339909,0.0017360253],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101543665,0.00065604044,0.00074811565,0.0043237787,0.016901415,0.0208868,0.003579709,0.00396477,0.030904181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028495077,0.00065777934,0.0007341827,0.0062105735,0.012430831,0.008485921,0.0038223441,0.0054050437,0.0021668153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012488462,0.00008505588,0.01890777,0.0011243932,0.00008032894,0.0015327524,0.041055292,0.0023626802,0.00099781,0.67292964,0.09506903,0.16573034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052953168,0.000051328236,0.028394975,0.002342014,0.000115100935,0.0008919824,0.10226956,0.0049875746,0.0013820315,0.08190371,0.7773621,0.00024661174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9611662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97079676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99642026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09231116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13560331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6697675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W154861593","doi":"","title":"Legal Aid in Ontario: A Comparative Perspective for U.S. Consideration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1287581957756812,"score_gpt":0.4607099017146684,"score_spread":0.3319517059389872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W154861593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24213436,0.013431333,0.0005813357,0.09146937,0.00038044623,0.00015035197,0.0022887436,0.00003164004,0.64953244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9472315,0.0092019355,0.0006031707,0.004123398,0.00010733106,0.00006884193,0.00034424165,0.000017151446,0.038302395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99513054,0.00068222947,0.00012193173,0.00015422114,0.0016635548,0.0022474958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931954,0.0010361968,0.00055933895,0.00015831365,0.0036799149,0.0013707682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020338867,0.00023888015,0.00043211278,0.003672938,0.013348904,0.006474915,0.0014224978,0.0019471778,0.0117298225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008501892,0.00026207187,0.00050583784,0.009442661,0.003929139,0.001871948,0.0021918684,0.0016431536,0.00034051618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030017793,0.00013062365,0.1050786,0.0010453002,0.00013987102,0.0017196137,0.032930367,0.0024278983,0.0004862479,0.66362023,0.12806022,0.06406088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012571151,0.00012757456,0.29871964,0.0012310809,0.00027833358,0.0005950972,0.110813014,0.0018858138,0.0005264461,0.018318476,0.5672567,0.00012216944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15950926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15950926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19793609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9748501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550906034","doi":"","title":"Litigating Family Law Economically: The Case Study of My Support Calculator, and Lessons for the Civil Litigation Bar","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Calculator; Bridge (graph theory); Public support; Civil procedure; Child support; Representation (politics); Law; Family law; Political science; Legal service; Business; Public administration; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05120476624619458,"score_gpt":0.3773690736467108,"score_spread":0.3261643074005162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550906034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6880355,0.0016701969,0.0018236131,0.1551879,0.00023710873,0.00016098279,0.000098883196,0.000039729315,0.15274614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9598839,0.0012528937,0.0009808777,0.007125744,0.000100665005,0.00006634839,0.000031948148,0.000032482836,0.030525137],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933255,0.0023690292,0.00012902926,0.00036016418,0.0012659584,0.0025502483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99398994,0.0023095433,0.0005047439,0.00021200928,0.0008744716,0.002109232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048617665,0.00042238005,0.0004417479,0.0013449007,0.045538686,0.006908106,0.0032449393,0.008907127,0.0071022026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016913518,0.00048652547,0.0005177154,0.001809292,0.012416421,0.003335981,0.006191344,0.00873836,0.00057288475],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011855362,0.0007640045,0.039844148,0.00013983334,0.000033069264,0.059347298,0.5631569,0.00082054053,0.0009216079,0.19352151,0.08936742,0.051965166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048441096,0.00016083206,0.026659425,0.00035697568,0.000040679533,0.010548456,0.7196946,0.001994154,0.0005330882,0.012659287,0.22722262,0.00008150938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7102285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89125293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7102285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04439885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035711147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.582956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550950790","doi":"","title":"Bridging the Gap Between Indian and North American Legal Education in the Boom of Legal Process Outsourcing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Outsourcing; Legal profession; Legal culture; International Legal English Certificate; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Legal history; Business; Comparative law; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.024776354580268445,"score_gpt":0.3460326656554789,"score_spread":0.32125631107521047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550950790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66660506,0.005377026,0.00074920786,0.05007563,0.00015520831,0.000032469703,0.00015063662,0.000031840344,0.2768229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855298,0.0028679632,0.00029682723,0.0035214077,0.000042063213,0.000012303357,0.00006730234,0.000014009691,0.007648369],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672556,0.0005331048,0.00008866952,0.00020480636,0.0009831109,0.0014647401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951191,0.001293975,0.0005940064,0.00015765842,0.0012395107,0.0015957488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001862915,0.00011301099,0.00018815017,0.0021409753,0.007225352,0.005742232,0.000842359,0.0006456994,0.007213444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041210945,0.00017656524,0.00017344175,0.007748337,0.0029444613,0.0023596752,0.0035191383,0.002336864,0.0003997758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016167505,0.0003710545,0.08672309,0.00053179247,0.000030368068,0.0018174228,0.3493471,0.00030845578,0.0016125792,0.32248113,0.024397574,0.21221778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011168423,0.000050734197,0.27364606,0.00068199623,0.000027110595,0.0007293573,0.42848772,0.0003029441,0.0004109664,0.0067520104,0.28884074,0.000059244467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24714577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.556233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24714577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013758176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023557287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49141443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552028553","doi":"","title":"The Tree of Knowledge/The Axe of Power: Gerald Le Dain and the Transformation of Canadian Legal Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Autonomy; Power (physics); De facto; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.01904521537381921,"score_gpt":0.3061441499769534,"score_spread":0.2870989346031342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552028553","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011774433,0.022874061,0.00046432158,0.8267862,0.0015688214,0.000021575757,0.000042399763,0.000038701528,0.13642938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6889438,0.026763009,0.0015465034,0.11932159,0.0011476023,0.000051576473,0.0000550608,0.00013088837,0.16203992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936935,0.0015584574,0.0000696547,0.00042686157,0.0022474737,0.0020041394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952447,0.0010825637,0.00020185101,0.00015867193,0.0016011778,0.0017110816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046053883,0.00042023516,0.00041156728,0.0019309858,0.037227113,0.015049193,0.0019345502,0.0067270086,0.004911687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00840838,0.0003119956,0.0002577104,0.0021601636,0.052786097,0.006652712,0.004438299,0.00886222,0.00053458964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017869817,0.000036087007,0.00092102814,0.000049329043,0.0000037038612,0.00019299753,0.03909734,0.00021482744,0.00008620763,0.70668423,0.22323081,0.029465625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017433302,0.000012902902,0.002343527,0.0002758215,0.000007189633,0.0000864895,0.045835312,0.00030943408,0.00013950292,0.09020488,0.86070204,0.00006531908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97855806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8116361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1883639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20048277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9413828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W155222966","doi":"","title":"The legal status of clinical and ethics policies, codes, and guidelines in medical practice and research.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Jurisprudence; Political science; Legislature; Professional conduct; Law; Ethical code; Legal profession; Practice of law; Legal research; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Medical law; Medicine","score_opus":0.41578300123739326,"score_gpt":0.6014557864024014,"score_spread":0.18567278516500813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W155222966","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020268152,0.04179504,0.087920465,0.5238951,0.0066841505,0.00055227557,0.0002739239,0.00019490573,0.318416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7692595,0.016076785,0.09564877,0.08969898,0.005460776,0.0021945834,0.0003483483,0.00017212797,0.021140078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.79580283,0.13289483,0.01376106,0.006857116,0.047239434,0.0034447266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6004672,0.30508733,0.025580697,0.03006516,0.03130191,0.0074976906],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1335477,0.0004881281,0.00072600757,0.0055643204,0.0070411656,0.015662568,0.0023183478,0.011098104,0.0028046693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3101583,0.00084631244,0.00046311182,0.0042251768,0.06926577,0.013007022,0.010366645,0.012288621,0.0010913273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066342727,0.000014002494,0.00052913115,0.00009776533,0.000007050914,0.00003874425,0.004782951,0.00007567792,0.00007844787,0.96631694,0.0058624023,0.022190185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002521768,0.0000452963,0.001561623,0.0020318078,0.000018874098,0.00027131505,0.004280604,0.0004193986,0.0002978446,0.84431016,0.14669538,0.0000424933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064979894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061984276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009619341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047103047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7062762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552784665","doi":"","title":"Experimenting with Problem-Based Learning in Constitutional Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05430242520721475,"score_gpt":0.3153112781414687,"score_spread":0.26100885293425397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552784665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9053195,0.00040172134,0.053132843,0.004433198,0.00017715523,0.00095456047,0.000062293344,0.00019732698,0.03532139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9014155,0.0007549798,0.085825734,0.0010185596,0.00011060066,0.0017732258,0.00011156882,0.00005561621,0.008934146],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992149,0.0055221003,0.00022720065,0.0006606489,0.0010006464,0.0004404303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707044,0.025253488,0.000850545,0.001271431,0.00072314113,0.001197005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013641935,0.00070720585,0.000571448,0.0006110496,0.0011248753,0.004389714,0.0021351227,0.0019523165,0.004360856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039957404,0.00034231515,0.00037059266,0.00091333047,0.0034517203,0.0050400263,0.003253895,0.0050917054,0.0007708736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023008513,0.054888025,0.01728272,0.0011223329,0.00013213011,0.0002924755,0.08464855,0.026979735,0.013662269,0.1901378,0.011711496,0.59684163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00511424,0.048411693,0.019086894,0.0011030392,0.0001861221,0.0005730335,0.045141876,0.25266832,0.053316884,0.3905043,0.18350634,0.0003872039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006358478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000828606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013641935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001164225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017559923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072146356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552970822","doi":"","title":"Law Students, Law Schools and Their Graduates","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Windsor; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Legal profession; Law; Legal research; Legal psychology; Political science; Population; Empirical legal studies; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.024926394983094017,"score_gpt":0.36098591037107336,"score_spread":0.33605951538797935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552970822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901406,0.00047019022,0.00006361857,0.0008174823,0.000023389597,0.000037129274,0.00016615987,0.000002554849,0.008278829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884593,0.0009104918,0.00014231882,0.0010839057,0.00005466959,0.000047455153,0.00029280566,0.000003327829,0.009005682],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979018,0.00036712305,0.00009100645,0.00015310507,0.00077021826,0.00071673444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99511045,0.0010893316,0.0012945945,0.00013848557,0.0007084584,0.0016587513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017925826,0.00015315674,0.00043144514,0.0023436206,0.0033810057,0.00422427,0.0006259063,0.0009377036,0.008905507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009297144,0.00027849496,0.00014904015,0.0028340183,0.0021606435,0.0018717938,0.0017813457,0.0015853688,0.0010209336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029556964,0.0002410781,0.90599716,0.000080157486,0.000015806421,0.0001526375,0.06062186,0.000018384146,0.00018609788,0.0023447804,0.0022208025,0.028091725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005036831,0.00010980136,0.8631768,0.00010966052,0.000009621881,0.0000935564,0.12289509,0.000031148265,0.000057154597,0.00032856298,0.0131723955,0.0000111136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15936661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37320665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15936661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003066386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050995885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31687796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553285045","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Legal Resources : Primary Sources - Aboriginal Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03344717642747205,"score_gpt":0.3667033863780319,"score_spread":0.3332562099505598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553285045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045884093,0.010726568,0.0015883787,0.0044387477,0.0004710613,0.00033149816,0.017856514,0.003261548,0.95673734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010430662,0.008582443,0.004704367,0.0008662575,0.00011643409,0.00027878312,0.00927789,0.0009703091,0.96477294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996371,0.000080221034,0.00003347212,0.000024644689,0.00016375972,0.000060803715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877435,0.00030205646,0.00006343832,0.000085283806,0.00059078226,0.00018399672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084613264,0.00047253745,0.00036087495,0.0040218174,0.003473883,0.0042413576,0.0007807479,0.0010774097,0.2734389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029983602,0.0005332426,0.00016604053,0.0051821577,0.00063996407,0.0031833171,0.0021994463,0.00097595935,0.115063995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012718655,0.000025810023,0.00048158926,0.0002958323,0.0000014143151,0.00009152245,0.0031528398,0.000027458595,0.00020108277,0.005295469,0.84744287,0.14297147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000263355,0.0000040197574,0.001425904,0.00032415992,0.000001463227,0.000054246077,0.0012252775,0.000023311197,0.00014497827,0.0006365696,0.9961505,0.000006999237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10794132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30709714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8920587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020716114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009732321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91474426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553425131","doi":"10.1002/9781118785317.weom020104","title":"Canada, Business Ethics In","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley Encyclopedia of Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; State (computer science); Political science; Philosophy of business; Information ethics; Economy; Sociology; Law; Management; Economics; Business model; Computer science","score_opus":0.038137123786030964,"score_gpt":0.3380141453582753,"score_spread":0.29987702157224433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553425131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042975037,0.033244967,0.000752077,0.25132707,0.0020831295,0.000046114892,0.0008107139,0.000087362096,0.7073511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26450205,0.03410096,0.002162954,0.071961455,0.00096059614,0.0000977823,0.0007043942,0.00018322139,0.6253266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947113,0.000861947,0.0001590613,0.00047796927,0.0022757407,0.0015140111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99223095,0.0013090973,0.00023449541,0.00024532218,0.00347783,0.0025022877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033410885,0.0004812443,0.00046358755,0.0023417037,0.021302078,0.012473989,0.001288034,0.005521842,0.032352034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009247755,0.00039109943,0.00029563,0.0049369917,0.01295442,0.0037971712,0.0032332344,0.007035534,0.00223767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075955704,0.000012788472,0.0005452394,0.00009173867,0.0000036599076,0.00011982815,0.002180343,0.00014225549,0.000038253493,0.59116846,0.38769144,0.01799847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004359388,0.0000024460458,0.0018510066,0.00025226403,0.0000036860188,0.00004950018,0.0020103124,0.000097938224,0.000037463993,0.023445034,0.97223175,0.000014285571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98513675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15645641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15645641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32243326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.978391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554530639","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4561","title":"Gender and Professionalism in Law: The Challenge of (Women’s) Biography","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Legal history; Law; Biography; Political science; Legal realism; Legal education; Gender studies; Legal writing; Legal practice; Sociology; Legal research","score_opus":0.11194327707706998,"score_gpt":0.4279801340191505,"score_spread":0.31603685694208056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554530639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14610428,0.040316578,0.0039584166,0.24203365,0.00391453,0.000040862422,0.0001004799,0.000051733183,0.56347954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92998284,0.012842209,0.00059519906,0.012334777,0.0011361599,0.000047266738,0.000021051059,0.000055461565,0.04298507],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970794,0.002066608,0.000049074,0.00016922306,0.00028953564,0.0003461711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952539,0.0034797683,0.00031618087,0.000170538,0.00023799467,0.0005415662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032864488,0.00041086835,0.00037629803,0.0013590566,0.01536058,0.009808724,0.0010028353,0.0027088893,0.00409969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051078326,0.00028664357,0.00013671514,0.0014895493,0.041344766,0.008879224,0.0035611927,0.0056805825,0.00052800006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000093681265,0.000017312732,0.00048331593,0.00006199981,0.000002505658,0.00029625828,0.67428917,0.000034077577,0.00009121155,0.30147922,0.014062534,0.009173008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004394633,0.000029049923,0.0007105648,0.00042407715,0.0000041286116,0.00055786356,0.41520986,0.00006707617,0.00016596967,0.04483443,0.53798217,0.000010399085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012571565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016212186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01536058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005899145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004033261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0428015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555210384","doi":"","title":"A Reply to Anderson's \"Clarifying What Values?\"","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06115517348594954,"score_gpt":0.3755677960656849,"score_spread":0.31441262257973535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555210384","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006713161,0.0005427677,0.00007795554,0.9908476,0.00811372,0.0000013560401,0.000006375359,0.000004188601,0.0003388596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015726126,0.00032653275,0.00012411422,0.9887213,0.008133208,0.0000089766845,0.000004147217,0.000012811321,0.0010962635],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9740476,0.010924144,0.002576896,0.0033704839,0.0059934286,0.003087363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85842866,0.10384834,0.0053139287,0.0031246615,0.01954906,0.009735353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03240643,0.0012921189,0.002235946,0.0021376316,0.014460773,0.012137938,0.0060108732,0.08822966,0.007814713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14651318,0.0018588046,0.0020657915,0.0026483727,0.028848121,0.0138373105,0.010135275,0.1376861,0.0052254796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000161318,0.000008886967,0.00009385814,0.000067432076,0.000016473457,0.00011707556,0.0018153304,0.000028861017,0.000050073908,0.020376153,0.9747073,0.002702354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075470176,0.000022877155,0.00066268584,0.0009667577,0.000058086483,0.0005489917,0.009061938,0.00021155679,0.00032501708,0.048343524,0.9395821,0.00014109867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038685706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04974559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08822966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013201182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026943654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17138368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557741963","doi":"","title":"\"A Wild Feminist at Her Raving Best\": Reflections on Studying Gender Bias in the Legal Profession","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Resources for feminist research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Social science; Art","score_opus":0.43754197932007644,"score_gpt":0.5525905300425932,"score_spread":0.11504855072251674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557741963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69214237,0.018261367,0.00415748,0.18288097,0.0018105753,0.00019232996,0.00017523619,0.00006649205,0.10031311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9487358,0.0036923003,0.00097492477,0.02161153,0.00053392065,0.00019064541,0.000029977335,0.00008740919,0.024143469],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96641326,0.02792146,0.00023229343,0.0010511058,0.0020957184,0.0022862575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695088,0.025783833,0.0015016682,0.00039828362,0.0013445661,0.0014628754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025133586,0.0008535051,0.000706978,0.0043633245,0.032254506,0.013544975,0.0025952687,0.0057419837,0.005476601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024382358,0.0007688854,0.00025769297,0.0034670872,0.055200767,0.007689314,0.008728321,0.005903593,0.00051597564],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008415145,0.000008295922,0.0015240555,0.000036590205,0.0000015751672,0.00021156167,0.9846277,0.000007773324,0.0001312254,0.008533164,0.002094912,0.0028146498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025057523,0.000012871948,0.0024319417,0.00018995794,0.0000021315686,0.00013557532,0.96231604,0.00002407938,0.000105723695,0.0010048847,0.033764556,0.000009736096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18916959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31338334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18916959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018257063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011467029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37613702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565934189","doi":"","title":"Getting Real: Enhancing the Acquisition of Negotiation Skills Through a Simulated Email Transaction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Redress; Class (philosophy); Database transaction; Psychology; Identity (music); Social psychology; Computer science; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02281973333931978,"score_gpt":0.33151121967735836,"score_spread":0.30869148633803856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565934189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7933172,0.0012454358,0.12378646,0.0020328634,0.00033745696,0.00069102284,0.00009367826,0.0019046293,0.076591305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8806367,0.0018507374,0.09792695,0.0005516214,0.00008865156,0.0004718671,0.0001981933,0.00019613738,0.018079098],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875534,0.0007775988,0.000065305234,0.000071725546,0.00022980232,0.00010022158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597543,0.0030694322,0.00025868247,0.00025746317,0.00017893512,0.00026003915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017734751,0.00057989877,0.00036493066,0.0004949272,0.00059257273,0.0023490363,0.0014733017,0.0012107221,0.007946883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007754308,0.00019624851,0.0003301414,0.00032641026,0.0008635453,0.0021753989,0.0019947174,0.0008178498,0.001931654],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008652978,0.0103439605,0.006551493,0.0034162558,0.00008787595,0.0014992841,0.022107763,0.018303914,0.052161522,0.033216946,0.015987579,0.83545804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010157651,0.022745736,0.02973167,0.003481442,0.000401094,0.005923937,0.029463664,0.11663284,0.17645206,0.060824614,0.55289996,0.00042732718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015017053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027390572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007946883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040378608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046935014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026584983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567790780","doi":"10.4324/9781315555485-10","title":"On Encountering Life and Learning With/out the Text: Reflections on Bańkowski and Del Mar","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.06679160875432967,"score_gpt":0.3726177473040075,"score_spread":0.30582613854967783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567790780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16424142,0.043424066,0.011068133,0.16391027,0.003819081,0.00038413648,0.00016912978,0.00021423581,0.6127696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71440583,0.031536467,0.0063754222,0.019253558,0.0006693014,0.00042452235,0.0001134574,0.00065722095,0.22656429],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930298,0.0051430687,0.000102003,0.0002967306,0.00089857413,0.0005298438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430263,0.004457368,0.0001746059,0.00015304364,0.0003820833,0.0005302398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006486499,0.0010061522,0.000757005,0.0020789702,0.02497057,0.01591506,0.002238327,0.0046785395,0.007164695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012548075,0.0007431145,0.00044235506,0.0017901362,0.04562886,0.012457787,0.010496528,0.010118799,0.0021495372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016653596,0.000035994555,0.00016877076,0.000112076465,0.0000023020953,0.00067964726,0.9027191,0.000028090259,0.0002338442,0.061388995,0.021681985,0.012932677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069463717,0.000013851012,0.00036511951,0.0006104471,0.0000049118585,0.00051704916,0.6172082,0.00003609356,0.0001901577,0.011119472,0.36991277,0.000014912538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049695864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11096108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049695864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014893926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010673467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10806352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568248857","doi":"","title":"Translucency and Morality: An Empirical Test of Moral Dispositions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASAC","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Test (biology); Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0984968853084723,"score_gpt":0.4670561560823152,"score_spread":0.36855927077384293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568248857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95933646,0.0000618363,0.0021941653,0.0007683189,0.000016331305,0.000073874726,0.000050539245,0.000011450516,0.03748699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903345,0.00001646156,0.00041607794,0.000057319885,0.000009814996,0.000028856464,0.000020121537,0.000005482398,0.00041237212],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98881066,0.0065299654,0.00067442306,0.0011476338,0.002009353,0.00082799664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8481768,0.08098686,0.039944537,0.015904136,0.00968421,0.005303569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0115011865,0.00023331217,0.00045256127,0.0014914732,0.0021638977,0.0023557832,0.00084368273,0.0018784066,0.013147238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1182104,0.00027320415,0.00046912496,0.0011437383,0.0091382405,0.0039858595,0.0029428478,0.0028170028,0.00063300057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034377342,0.0040892996,0.4997855,0.0005816996,0.00030137168,0.0010181831,0.0664277,0.0018832685,0.007318441,0.35124114,0.0019510465,0.061964583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007232251,0.0020255516,0.6586787,0.00030035456,0.00023870994,0.0016780205,0.040337816,0.007661437,0.0054337336,0.27400184,0.008781829,0.00013870667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076619495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006506165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013147238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010542399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001499173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06082487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568347023","doi":"","title":"Lawyering at the Intersection of Public Law and Legal Ethics: Government Lawyers as Custodians of the Rule of Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Custodians; Government (linguistics); Law; Legal ethics; Professional responsibility; Political science; Duty; Accountability; Professional conduct","score_opus":0.02423958591089196,"score_gpt":0.33433971851288885,"score_spread":0.31010013260199687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568347023","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24666429,0.010118014,0.017454946,0.4377391,0.0006596086,0.00009871386,0.000027808283,0.00016250194,0.2870751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711766,0.0017191463,0.0026760933,0.011658559,0.00013607487,0.000019347213,0.000007219094,0.00002736796,0.012579744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98926204,0.0053460174,0.00016122611,0.0006114463,0.0017819081,0.0028373713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918073,0.0036274176,0.00093540334,0.00033743941,0.0010136054,0.0022787754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006353508,0.00020611941,0.0004394944,0.0012242828,0.022627328,0.02024839,0.0014094408,0.008458586,0.0045227646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009972595,0.00055003224,0.0002959204,0.0014436165,0.059141163,0.01367927,0.007065374,0.008716854,0.00059327227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021843232,0.00007097295,0.0033990704,0.000055858392,0.0000045368893,0.00068125065,0.16729178,0.00016561394,0.00042791432,0.7983237,0.009661646,0.019895937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040446692,0.00007872227,0.010519693,0.00060531363,0.00003891282,0.0007974405,0.272745,0.001422464,0.0007340932,0.39932957,0.31359386,0.00009436722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32408717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42030337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32408717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039802402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06648891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64440155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568749169","doi":"","title":"Information Sources Used by Lawyers in Problem-Solving: An Empirical Exploration","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Information seeking; Work (physics); Task (project management); Public relations; Focus (optics); Psychology; Empirical research; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Management; Engineering; Information retrieval; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.18681326473365717,"score_gpt":0.4068608228658064,"score_spread":0.2200475581321492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568749169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950754,0.0004571971,0.001282992,0.00031458947,0.0000029364685,0.00010719027,0.000041641113,0.000010914176,0.0027070472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99523145,0.0008319673,0.0029064496,0.00013078288,0.000011611394,0.00011582611,0.000085763124,0.000012616267,0.0006735635],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.983889,0.010440334,0.0008396083,0.00072137226,0.0032351066,0.00087469496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7981471,0.18291928,0.010228755,0.002345899,0.0048318785,0.0015270574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014694553,0.00031316918,0.00074272015,0.006570434,0.002229083,0.004454878,0.0011717337,0.0016484163,0.004623578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.104276195,0.0007222273,0.00034196564,0.0056288424,0.0018485711,0.0058891755,0.002508603,0.0012695555,0.000475429],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005085033,0.0026987623,0.34038275,0.0011751377,0.000093678704,0.0021911166,0.49449655,0.00026199408,0.002312932,0.0059476173,0.0012126793,0.14871824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027005022,0.0014054397,0.34716427,0.0020295242,0.00025520546,0.0032077213,0.6085651,0.005564077,0.0032571603,0.0066799335,0.021510923,0.000090536625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018624318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003667099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014694553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001815801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002367786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07771319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569875758","doi":"","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE ETHICS AND POLITICS OF ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS STRUCTURES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.06398585931603276,"score_gpt":0.43780275808934227,"score_spread":0.3738168987733095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569875758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18705292,0.003599926,0.006676929,0.11467246,0.00016467222,0.0000653061,0.000075976284,0.00003401465,0.6876578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979905,0.00061232195,0.0006671596,0.0032491968,0.000043090266,0.000015826192,0.00001016986,0.000016217917,0.015481055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794384,0.0056348536,0.00029137378,0.0013459688,0.0056366674,0.0076527265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887383,0.0042695752,0.0009657143,0.0006932925,0.0023069,0.003026273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006360607,0.0002766093,0.0005443681,0.0024888478,0.027913477,0.020806879,0.00207212,0.006961224,0.008027715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016207881,0.0003686067,0.0005419264,0.002677483,0.07818374,0.005943207,0.0082096085,0.0074508763,0.00036308763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064835476,0.00001241425,0.0010317287,0.000010530051,0.0000041188755,0.000090769056,0.008023067,0.00013436127,0.00003724764,0.984823,0.0016321923,0.0041941195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039119193,0.00002925643,0.011433679,0.00034446386,0.000025857391,0.00021041559,0.047810826,0.0016488531,0.0002527666,0.7764277,0.16170304,0.00007404266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8406586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89835817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8406586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07771347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08687262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56385326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570708826","doi":"","title":"EXPERIENCIAS CLÍNICAS EN CANADÁ Y LA DEFENSA MUNDIALIZADA DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Digitum: Institutional Repository of the University of Murcia (University of Murcia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Geography; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.018357083053443687,"score_gpt":0.279546877978036,"score_spread":0.2611897949245923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570708826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7822789,0.006187765,0.0024440314,0.046264168,0.0003643272,0.00016448018,0.0002727362,0.0000866538,0.16193686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734489,0.00295889,0.0006891215,0.0014894581,0.00002669891,0.000042825228,0.000047434136,0.000026323889,0.02127048],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897569,0.003983069,0.00020506827,0.00054899376,0.0027173131,0.0027887647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98608255,0.0037460104,0.0011888181,0.0004990148,0.003598894,0.0048846933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007220421,0.00043737382,0.00054920197,0.0020658644,0.02948645,0.011438245,0.0020845633,0.0023219017,0.008251852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014208547,0.00033687495,0.00030212622,0.0043950314,0.025685554,0.002920106,0.008620168,0.0034848282,0.0005141856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046602036,0.00009959722,0.028510898,0.00016581887,0.000013953345,0.0016878905,0.87483066,0.00023324897,0.0006036906,0.029602624,0.01717575,0.047029287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000478278,0.000027876127,0.016946923,0.00023985175,0.000007654765,0.0003006969,0.9112607,0.00009855575,0.00022822908,0.0015750314,0.06926909,0.00004061294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.945669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9799999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07596875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07596875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17645654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5511944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573431212","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4562","title":"Bringing the Clinic into the 21st Century","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Ideology; Legal profession; Curriculum; Legal research; Economic Justice; Political science; Legal service; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0667829213781849,"score_gpt":0.42395261766041903,"score_spread":0.35716969628223416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573431212","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012100643,0.038421065,0.004540282,0.68751955,0.014790436,0.00006943067,0.00011022631,0.00031944475,0.24212892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32291916,0.07075024,0.011112075,0.29220027,0.016988618,0.0002608983,0.00019928745,0.00044281094,0.28512663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394387,0.0024598665,0.0001316651,0.00073750434,0.0012876112,0.0014395285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98864335,0.0012860264,0.00041500994,0.00042467864,0.0008467535,0.008384262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004474971,0.00048750988,0.00042990543,0.0015433677,0.015888123,0.014251188,0.0022894049,0.010928171,0.057978738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068971985,0.00042870938,0.00039191789,0.0011263749,0.019446833,0.014102344,0.016168734,0.012521486,0.0064285626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000351232,0.00022990181,0.0016833985,0.00025710397,0.0000067811357,0.0008321657,0.016510196,0.00009767514,0.0003434773,0.41085282,0.424037,0.14511435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008850152,0.000034103217,0.0004888123,0.00032158365,0.0000015116774,0.00048576138,0.0073534474,0.00003356838,0.000041940115,0.022386998,0.96883196,0.0000115385155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017763592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06263794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98937833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010621685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032080177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19395816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573499850","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1488265","title":"Born to Be Wild: The 'Trans‐Systemic' Programme at McGill and the De‐Nationalization of Legal Education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal education; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.01709607858701736,"score_gpt":0.33405914580096535,"score_spread":0.316963067213948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573499850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32965627,0.0024324195,0.0010116652,0.48949665,0.0016162016,0.00016892793,0.000110642264,0.00006770092,0.17543943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8571965,0.00029528732,0.00070696615,0.040543023,0.000119461474,0.00009803447,0.000032272274,0.000033275755,0.10097516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944185,0.0017558788,0.000058157893,0.0003628705,0.0005236669,0.00288098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909155,0.0015828538,0.0003892745,0.0002972526,0.0004364291,0.006378667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007820309,0.0002433869,0.00023205891,0.00039982912,0.012692364,0.005312069,0.0015608536,0.0050871107,0.017626489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009560433,0.00029313547,0.00022591962,0.00059252157,0.0079737585,0.0035657166,0.011302575,0.008118003,0.0004493921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002627526,0.00050841813,0.011327953,0.00019441218,0.000021950213,0.0016639085,0.08066197,0.00034867972,0.002848051,0.6699454,0.13958536,0.09263123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019486148,0.00039774226,0.08574822,0.00038251502,0.000033929053,0.0005446575,0.1084253,0.0005914926,0.0026770418,0.041732077,0.75912917,0.00014303967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24245334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6231633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01870712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.085076585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4820842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574503403","doi":"","title":"Justice Bertha Wilson: One Woman's Difference","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Family law; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.04079425639337281,"score_gpt":0.36780347354361553,"score_spread":0.3270092171502427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574503403","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015090886,0.018871192,0.00069518376,0.6962856,0.012432825,0.00002752603,0.000053202886,0.000086245855,0.25645742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34537715,0.0134978155,0.00081574393,0.29759815,0.0029418273,0.00005055104,0.000045294608,0.0002607621,0.33941272],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504155,0.0014214466,0.000047799367,0.00046341398,0.0012160144,0.0018096837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664044,0.000678972,0.000093001065,0.00010147496,0.000739787,0.0017462163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002935062,0.0004159763,0.0005495051,0.00083876634,0.047783006,0.00955194,0.0014349314,0.0056908075,0.010878761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008018374,0.0003892768,0.00027231188,0.0007757927,0.018909896,0.0050809165,0.0058437493,0.012502839,0.0018733756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023488308,0.000036464084,0.0010004861,0.000041713804,0.000004896483,0.0011848671,0.10747976,0.000019624655,0.00020513368,0.18756817,0.6718706,0.030564705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035565133,0.000011029143,0.00051122345,0.000117660915,0.0000035384169,0.00046253027,0.055752017,0.000013200031,0.000055725035,0.0077160494,0.93533236,0.00002112175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47440696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7184652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52559304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023744565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037812334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9432912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575792737","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2604","title":"The Teaching of Procedure Across Common Law Systems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03228174026991738,"score_gpt":0.3822639925704507,"score_spread":0.3499822523005333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575792737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47409675,0.006157964,0.025786633,0.028503276,0.0003173623,0.000112131325,0.000037763977,0.00015502202,0.4648332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989791,0.0015136104,0.002381351,0.0009191868,0.000047599595,0.000031451447,0.000012428516,0.000030522857,0.0052728793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98512655,0.0073260586,0.0004997248,0.0010088838,0.0032341245,0.0028047091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894609,0.0059884307,0.0011659024,0.0009671987,0.0010681489,0.0013494157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074891676,0.00020644668,0.00041072676,0.0026477717,0.010454677,0.008621761,0.001618572,0.0023967547,0.0038135627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020297552,0.00030050575,0.00046413846,0.0028602048,0.03260827,0.0067930967,0.009427847,0.0030355284,0.00036327532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027163858,0.00010248249,0.0050401455,0.00021391577,0.000011916184,0.00025807606,0.142355,0.0007841379,0.0011122868,0.7076275,0.0031605295,0.1393069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046430618,0.00038987806,0.04392986,0.0020186245,0.000055082648,0.0008067229,0.26385832,0.003141614,0.0033082494,0.3076661,0.37467656,0.00010251318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06157895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09914696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06157895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019459777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032099165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14119124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578852818","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1313148","title":"The Practice of Ethical Precepts: Dissecting Decision-Making by Lawyers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Ethical decision; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01552135475262058,"score_gpt":0.3956100334382791,"score_spread":0.38008867868565854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578852818","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30367702,0.0053438027,0.3352171,0.14551379,0.0025712573,0.00092639355,0.00015546328,0.0003671224,0.20622806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90773904,0.0005438175,0.078817904,0.005986325,0.00023071439,0.00064889726,0.000038132166,0.00011994455,0.005875356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.80563736,0.1753014,0.0023797813,0.0043305675,0.009103232,0.0032477535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5913789,0.35816613,0.011170792,0.01937404,0.014496406,0.005413771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11194244,0.000864019,0.00088847644,0.0055283573,0.014927714,0.01589244,0.003627999,0.007242899,0.005572268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28451788,0.00081744307,0.00074708724,0.0022066243,0.06982747,0.021087075,0.015376903,0.011018917,0.00075365405],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017194082,0.00012010348,0.003635089,0.0003109363,0.000032633987,0.00046172194,0.42433256,0.0004946538,0.00047228677,0.49928126,0.0076231663,0.06306367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069103386,0.00006524371,0.0016497178,0.00075162505,0.000025561623,0.0005561562,0.21869817,0.0026706534,0.0017049919,0.7315359,0.042213134,0.000059643662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024898506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004344232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11194244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067070615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018421018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59201527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579376339","doi":"","title":"Tracing trends : the impact of science and technology on the law of criminal evidence and procedure","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Discipline; Scientific evidence; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10407619472656264,"score_gpt":0.38209804877053904,"score_spread":0.2780218540439764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579376339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04964928,0.12312294,0.06989615,0.5723224,0.0042038406,0.00027181886,0.00035037802,0.0002587725,0.1799243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6936952,0.12244534,0.071392894,0.07759064,0.0066807666,0.00047637898,0.00025357763,0.00048538158,0.026979873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93474686,0.031206347,0.003730444,0.0063165124,0.02137487,0.0026249758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8127125,0.15005472,0.010533706,0.0105572445,0.014246485,0.0018952871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0562893,0.0008211742,0.0008840532,0.0077384487,0.0071778507,0.023833353,0.0030357419,0.009786916,0.0044094394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.110249974,0.001110422,0.0012637773,0.0075199236,0.05712364,0.057458315,0.010440297,0.017144596,0.0010653858],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035886576,0.000038826813,0.0033901364,0.00039925685,0.00002723912,0.0002562125,0.018574962,0.00048085704,0.00044407015,0.903406,0.006256567,0.06668997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016508428,0.0001965924,0.004984168,0.0021181197,0.000041206276,0.00065767585,0.015109283,0.0013102504,0.0013050981,0.6038268,0.37032032,0.00011394205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013157888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010839851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0562893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015202692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013511801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29768986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580049906","doi":"","title":"Taking Stock of Taking Stock","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Equity (law); Business; Club deal; Stock (firearms); Private equity; Equity theory; Contingency; Private equity fund; Private equity firm; Equity risk; Finance; Actuarial science; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Duty; Engineering","score_opus":0.06446191931497597,"score_gpt":0.3721154548569552,"score_spread":0.3076535355419792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580049906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35369733,0.0024289533,0.012627657,0.04150615,0.00074769766,0.00025866085,0.000093042094,0.0002846518,0.5883559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8175624,0.0011034755,0.004725059,0.012469386,0.0002764621,0.000073110525,0.000060837356,0.0000789539,0.16365021],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555594,0.00094723795,0.00014585626,0.0005662158,0.0017833473,0.0010014095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922764,0.0021431793,0.0010634189,0.0011321418,0.0012531835,0.0021317694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032873752,0.0003034203,0.0003005467,0.0006119743,0.0055590146,0.00541729,0.0011426095,0.0029618668,0.028930176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013911109,0.00028802452,0.00036105321,0.00033630867,0.004898979,0.0040393053,0.0038854417,0.003845845,0.0038761052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017395726,0.0010726629,0.06793975,0.00017327708,0.000055539498,0.0026363393,0.019476868,0.0006826783,0.0082467245,0.35009953,0.093237974,0.45620468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007185461,0.0009927466,0.038105156,0.00066830294,0.00014317018,0.0036693304,0.029227648,0.002678028,0.012868622,0.084652714,0.82677275,0.00014968104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005749418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013474011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028930176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022422313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057095042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096781135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581399311","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1211","title":"Does Civility Matter?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Misconduct; Loyalty; Political science; Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Law; Sociology; Representation (politics); Criminology; Politics","score_opus":0.04472528224747482,"score_gpt":0.34964435407498284,"score_spread":0.30491907182750805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581399311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022706676,0.028483033,0.0009838768,0.7810966,0.0018966313,0.000013003148,0.000065903696,0.000026320819,0.16472796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.787547,0.021250904,0.00048998045,0.16342358,0.0024521884,0.000021775795,0.000081558566,0.000058906957,0.024674017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99118793,0.004686388,0.00018460078,0.00076938636,0.0015327992,0.0016390082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97570705,0.014278224,0.0016813658,0.000699072,0.0032623669,0.0043719867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009540902,0.00029978578,0.00054833025,0.0015585687,0.013004935,0.012734255,0.0012830122,0.006403035,0.012699656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029074932,0.00023452101,0.00038935101,0.0016798706,0.05588306,0.011203643,0.00391572,0.00669184,0.0017177296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023496346,0.00003367635,0.0050145425,0.0000992657,0.000013191699,0.00017161097,0.014393539,0.00004735925,0.000042734908,0.8936109,0.06345336,0.023096306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021171472,0.00003975561,0.00974704,0.0007390437,0.000028748887,0.00037874145,0.04762092,0.00013855247,0.00015191505,0.5284303,0.4126661,0.000037787322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123272374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014031366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018648133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1818453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584692578","doi":"10.21991/c9wm20","title":"Lost in Translation: Social Realities, Insite, and the Law in Legal Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Translation (biology); Legal education; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04068595896223407,"score_gpt":0.34353909076111633,"score_spread":0.30285313179888224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584692578","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015567165,0.020050948,0.0022165154,0.76756895,0.011961988,0.000028998104,0.00014285461,0.0000681066,0.18239452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79112685,0.020083006,0.0021257198,0.09829625,0.012825105,0.00014991357,0.00022702124,0.00032181162,0.074844465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99030006,0.006697165,0.0004171605,0.00070212164,0.0012163827,0.00066701934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644641,0.026439397,0.0011626484,0.0019423647,0.0040948493,0.0018966164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010055202,0.00067188236,0.00081029814,0.0031948981,0.01089546,0.025271032,0.0015086756,0.0070907897,0.03020163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04219499,0.0003844522,0.00046725117,0.0042739366,0.041255087,0.020915424,0.007252969,0.0118456,0.0028003675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003330144,0.00007959079,0.0010314903,0.0003053452,0.000010419828,0.00015430697,0.08957403,0.00006800831,0.00006521685,0.79740787,0.069363885,0.041906632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003370929,0.00002885476,0.0027164186,0.0028017436,0.000021128357,0.00017311238,0.17359845,0.00034243517,0.00031215462,0.42689013,0.39304033,0.00004156175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019286383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024397092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03020163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010500673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018765895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10103458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584774729","doi":"","title":"Administrative Justice & Adjudicative Ethics in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Economic Justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Foundation (evidence); Public administration; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.08996048298872213,"score_gpt":0.42929580046101873,"score_spread":0.3393353174722966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584774729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045607533,0.023415321,0.028522694,0.38844332,0.001989314,0.00033056948,0.00021485658,0.0002031013,0.51127326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88592756,0.007937087,0.013744347,0.038351834,0.00060517906,0.0001818698,0.00009435487,0.00009867761,0.0530591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94044137,0.022269925,0.0020054167,0.0033452327,0.019271076,0.012667058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94970894,0.019868102,0.0027547975,0.0021534534,0.017572818,0.007941784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024549479,0.00047212123,0.00076267973,0.0025471228,0.042293727,0.019431543,0.002975969,0.007556826,0.004401475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05271531,0.00066024956,0.00061126077,0.007103013,0.050643798,0.005335755,0.008778416,0.011158742,0.0005277306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009038066,0.000013573051,0.0011892269,0.000055595825,0.0000075807247,0.00012969648,0.007106219,0.0004036627,0.00006426034,0.9651195,0.014914242,0.010987386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004545396,0.00003869743,0.0116226105,0.00067950215,0.000035729692,0.00022331973,0.01870825,0.0035746514,0.00039040585,0.37707743,0.58742034,0.00018355667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9779323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9777809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18467861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18467861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41608003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94565725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584821635","doi":"","title":"Globalizing Approaches to Legal Education and Training: Canada to Japan","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Prime minister; Institution; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Training (meteorology); Law; Training system; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.1796698798122861,"score_gpt":0.3661295201458155,"score_spread":0.1864596403335294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584821635","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16165332,0.051607817,0.0022095698,0.52279377,0.005103509,0.0003534848,0.0006808096,0.00018399968,0.25541377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.791105,0.033466298,0.007226581,0.047280177,0.001029813,0.00022529732,0.00046195305,0.00010792331,0.1190969],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683124,0.0003024537,0.00010226154,0.00027320554,0.00054829323,0.0019425439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99148315,0.00041436517,0.00019561114,0.00013788146,0.0024779725,0.005291042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029421062,0.0006107454,0.0004249375,0.0017300689,0.012493728,0.006244238,0.0009689503,0.003752113,0.011088765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051397425,0.00033336141,0.00047712337,0.0030067335,0.0057254755,0.0027127631,0.0049164626,0.004568327,0.0004129536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003350402,0.00044394252,0.041463032,0.0011370642,0.00008909947,0.0022595439,0.031878483,0.0017614319,0.0014850082,0.2735199,0.27005953,0.37556797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000253611,0.00017332645,0.10499506,0.0010175048,0.00019190228,0.0002786594,0.04024694,0.0008212077,0.0006628706,0.0129185915,0.8383104,0.00012987682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9704897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99039614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9298478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0701522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27365294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5089922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588099873","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2792","title":"Towards a Pedagogy of Diversity in Legal Education","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Diversity (politics); Scholarship; Legal profession; Political science; Normative; Promotion (chess); Experiential learning; Sociology; Legal research; Norm (philosophy); Economic Justice; Identity (music); Pedagogy; Law; Public relations","score_opus":0.14066691913963547,"score_gpt":0.44365810830520264,"score_spread":0.30299118916556717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588099873","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04102498,0.01234955,0.121646225,0.415522,0.0026775892,0.00037013387,0.000023945717,0.00032448367,0.40606108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7635134,0.013235222,0.1318204,0.041692395,0.0017767652,0.0007327347,0.000046559442,0.00016267184,0.0470199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868618,0.00973633,0.00028991702,0.00062963297,0.0017829862,0.00069929234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867703,0.00817247,0.00093817967,0.00064951077,0.00092884264,0.0025407595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014122514,0.00046715548,0.00047324607,0.0032920733,0.00985421,0.013114302,0.0020944572,0.005334953,0.0042416374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013944915,0.0003808667,0.00063772924,0.0013152951,0.033805422,0.0136655355,0.018678335,0.014254518,0.0009553978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007557068,0.00020188757,0.0010842171,0.00019864806,0.0000054225047,0.0001567828,0.05436412,0.0003667616,0.00031556067,0.86763567,0.009151203,0.06651205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022404693,0.00008370206,0.0008583025,0.0009198381,0.0000055342184,0.0002879971,0.035162322,0.0006503231,0.00039880112,0.68946993,0.27212173,0.000019142306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002152064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00400602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014122514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078692725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018025964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0746879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588591003","doi":"","title":"Literary Evidence and Legal Aesthetics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Discipline; Legal writing; Legal education; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Law and literature; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies; Law; Legal research; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Comparative law; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.18396325333503355,"score_gpt":0.45482443160075975,"score_spread":0.2708611782657262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588591003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02803581,0.011255607,0.0037727798,0.028898254,0.000998758,0.000012291309,0.000033289045,0.00004936425,0.92694384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391892,0.004816032,0.0016912264,0.0017658522,0.0014160675,0.000025388048,0.000044623026,0.00012378747,0.050927892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545103,0.0027113704,0.00015430493,0.00037063766,0.0010261349,0.00028659537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922875,0.005317908,0.00067616836,0.00073310314,0.00071976887,0.00026554227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032576104,0.0005618693,0.00046993617,0.004948331,0.008174665,0.012325803,0.001359483,0.0027991189,0.011404477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011274756,0.0002904501,0.0003550708,0.0023211993,0.04767768,0.009619187,0.0053628506,0.004160975,0.001323896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069417333,0.000006509796,0.00018579495,0.000053587744,0.000003026603,0.00019288175,0.018130973,0.000060736358,0.00006488843,0.97162026,0.004153153,0.005521269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014655548,0.000020612579,0.00075814046,0.00070339156,0.0000107045635,0.000658768,0.02899767,0.00035001792,0.00028994377,0.5677986,0.40038165,0.000015793034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013838961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00237786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012325803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039816196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001363665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0381518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589345877","doi":"","title":"Unbundled Legal Services: Untying the Bundle in New York State","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œFordham urban law journal/Fordham urban law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unbundling; Population; Business; Eviction; Law; Legislation; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04412532712864885,"score_gpt":0.29598988626212835,"score_spread":0.2518645591334795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589345877","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18243822,0.0069286027,0.0009687524,0.70129573,0.0040252036,0.0001668363,0.00035325458,0.00016860325,0.103654705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68598086,0.011812298,0.0019389632,0.13303769,0.0015352832,0.00032240406,0.000445481,0.00015421883,0.16477288],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848074,0.00026006525,0.000067287685,0.00015311239,0.00037443216,0.00066442933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995902,0.00031343702,0.00023699552,0.00008133725,0.00033711348,0.0031290571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001736397,0.00018674231,0.00018526285,0.0006654822,0.01132052,0.0058023343,0.0014305094,0.0052601513,0.02360758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003544603,0.00042363672,0.0001795807,0.00075293006,0.005352669,0.006471036,0.006791669,0.0075064483,0.001312034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008449163,0.0006194254,0.04993089,0.0002961392,0.000019318084,0.0031734197,0.037056748,0.00038668385,0.0011816558,0.09431705,0.6379236,0.17501059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055689456,0.00014530242,0.07095023,0.0011739671,0.000019718063,0.00078034145,0.06850721,0.0011140812,0.00030346127,0.018615274,0.83823806,0.00009659752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46316436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72423196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46316436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011284339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043867383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9209369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590955778","doi":"","title":"Charting the Growth of Animal Law in Education","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Subject (documents); Face (sociological concept); Law; Political science; Legal education; Wish; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.06764738697303534,"score_gpt":0.39537864921536897,"score_spread":0.3277312622423336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590955778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34583688,0.032620784,0.007193036,0.2752365,0.0012990704,0.00008526514,0.00035515253,0.0003496928,0.33702374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94646275,0.012006918,0.0070779906,0.008272524,0.0007226383,0.000035770783,0.00016378223,0.00007316793,0.025184399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969511,0.00095590984,0.00012542354,0.00038150212,0.0009603785,0.000625713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98392636,0.005999331,0.002211403,0.00065949094,0.0033556793,0.0038477124],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038609365,0.00018886443,0.00017007581,0.0034493117,0.0022800192,0.0067562787,0.00056007033,0.0019188382,0.008125973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008989531,0.00023885189,0.00013846306,0.0044417307,0.0055503543,0.005404003,0.0048374236,0.0028801141,0.00086312625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052904812,0.00020117186,0.03652103,0.00026516753,0.000007085034,0.00038387312,0.009882993,0.00056300045,0.0020614373,0.4535057,0.047267675,0.4492879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009891602,0.00011927586,0.09132071,0.00047531677,0.000003407968,0.0003603712,0.009104928,0.0008193149,0.0009092961,0.01919199,0.87765527,0.000030194435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013997742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024158819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007953646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009645265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057707965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591040560","doi":"10.7202/1007820ar","title":"John Mark Keyes, Executive Legislation, 2d ed (Markham: LexisNexis, 2010), pp 611. ISBN 978-0-43-346025-1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Library science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06860858094544267,"score_gpt":0.3305393646357795,"score_spread":0.26193078369033684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591040560","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056919793,0.57067704,0.0017095534,0.05176078,0.006694803,0.000104007166,0.002099249,0.0006245634,0.36576074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034833695,0.23039632,0.0013522144,0.00822711,0.0018867382,0.00015027054,0.0010534053,0.0003002971,0.7531503],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987955,0.00020566273,0.00014970032,0.00020012353,0.0005480878,0.00010097942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987116,0.00061352487,0.00020477008,0.000058839913,0.0003085756,0.00010267668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012355843,0.0017937082,0.00092711067,0.0043786806,0.0017236237,0.005099465,0.001528689,0.0047382102,0.22794951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038267097,0.0013004185,0.000439639,0.0048352643,0.0012923595,0.010192771,0.0018468122,0.0028045545,0.18426523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011623866,0.0000081415865,0.000071952694,0.0002943762,0.0000028803372,0.00003252823,0.00019152027,0.00003539699,0.000084237545,0.005165742,0.9526315,0.041470148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036327417,0.000003806449,0.0003270277,0.0005299481,0.000002640334,0.00006782194,0.00020452168,0.00002469581,0.00006381789,0.002106302,0.9966576,0.000008133336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022134004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056521248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22794951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037233233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035285722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7625671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591788322","doi":"10.1023/a:1009205626028","title":"Barriers to Gender Equality in the Canadian Legal Establishment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Queen's University","funders":"Canadian Bar Association","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Political science; Privilege (computing); Legislature; Government (linguistics); Practice of law; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.10928262914200731,"score_gpt":0.4240002035658897,"score_spread":0.3147175744238824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591788322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7029186,0.003003717,0.0009203926,0.08868287,0.00023339424,0.00017168593,0.00023783722,0.000027374585,0.20380421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829699,0.0008044297,0.00024470748,0.0030523217,0.000027493668,0.000035408208,0.000027207094,0.000015197426,0.012823246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97347766,0.0033205699,0.00042442814,0.001173385,0.0068697813,0.014734166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95312124,0.017211776,0.0027584166,0.00093263667,0.010749556,0.015226352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012491069,0.00028999022,0.0008136964,0.0042750756,0.06064153,0.016170038,0.0045929174,0.004690975,0.019068489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042688336,0.00072008173,0.00064114196,0.006056035,0.024264947,0.00454903,0.009906768,0.009725693,0.00047273366],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015277792,0.0003369981,0.05946136,0.0002926816,0.000041469208,0.0012771796,0.25470492,0.001076393,0.0007370958,0.5856145,0.030857755,0.0654469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064750115,0.00008748851,0.20557082,0.0012453808,0.00007729277,0.00028096532,0.5590952,0.0013871634,0.000554746,0.031842962,0.1996021,0.00019112875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99779344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2332248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2332248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38092723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88935053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592677246","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2509596","title":"Canada's 'Top Sex Crime Lawyers': The Ethical Parameters of Commercial Expression by the Criminal Defence Bar","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Bar (unit); Political science; Law; Criminal law; Expression (computer science); Criminal procedure; Psychology; Physics; Computer science","score_opus":0.023267172678540678,"score_gpt":0.33381607274901215,"score_spread":0.3105489000704715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592677246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13496567,0.0027970732,0.0010281774,0.6257651,0.0014528376,0.000051636125,0.00028257453,0.000053440865,0.23360357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83307123,0.00083722424,0.00070272444,0.06594618,0.00028419076,0.000023906749,0.00005258294,0.000099036304,0.09898287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98842376,0.0017042634,0.00014956968,0.0006904861,0.004260724,0.004771222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828636,0.004601273,0.0007386014,0.0005192932,0.005720237,0.005557041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00592343,0.00025433165,0.00040847942,0.0012967644,0.035551704,0.022386424,0.0023408127,0.011975752,0.014780754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026850386,0.0005077447,0.00040496513,0.0017752446,0.017873364,0.0038586373,0.0041655186,0.014405288,0.0007243807],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070933966,0.000079271085,0.010032624,0.00007222527,0.0000210979,0.0007560238,0.05285672,0.00031893465,0.0004327165,0.5447688,0.3497679,0.04082272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044074986,0.000033779837,0.035188157,0.00034133805,0.000044972163,0.00029878927,0.1084465,0.0007011374,0.0007541708,0.03882206,0.8151512,0.00017385991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9794812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088792935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088792935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2434481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64424086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159303357","doi":"","title":"Links Between Physical and Legal Structures of Community Title Schemes and Disputes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scheme (mathematics); Political science; Legal research; Sociology; Law and economics; Public relations; Mathematics","score_opus":0.016663170842689947,"score_gpt":0.2910143884957169,"score_spread":0.274351217653027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159303357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7665856,0.003392236,0.053908322,0.012156874,0.00016820844,0.0007700332,0.00016853248,0.00008291049,0.16276729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939108,0.00029504622,0.0035114812,0.00017463448,0.00006224433,0.0001436285,0.000035327954,0.0000089630075,0.0018579722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9212561,0.042360965,0.006541186,0.0037693533,0.02169776,0.0043745115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.676568,0.22357233,0.06852957,0.011615837,0.013509605,0.0062047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04440776,0.00023668807,0.00067575235,0.0073329103,0.011602161,0.010263254,0.0028033785,0.004283892,0.0086460905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21774444,0.0007267143,0.00042071776,0.006714324,0.023429608,0.012971516,0.009180008,0.0036069448,0.00044933642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021275131,0.0002803068,0.079935804,0.0006283076,0.000052044652,0.0013027566,0.11119515,0.001765951,0.001103139,0.71924245,0.0023677032,0.08191364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001854257,0.0005414328,0.16222472,0.002483608,0.000082789775,0.0031966616,0.2112056,0.007306973,0.0015447465,0.47754157,0.13337503,0.00031151617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040852246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060242726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04440776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009553469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076164044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23485345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593406988","doi":"","title":"Restructuring of the jurisprudence course taught at the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03029370895015538,"score_gpt":0.3173657925887737,"score_spread":0.2870720836386183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593406988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85823196,0.0014385136,0.014803983,0.020657884,0.00077511865,0.011394083,0.0007397641,0.0010134208,0.09094528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81493336,0.0014217296,0.067541696,0.005145835,0.00028814265,0.0027132337,0.0010186404,0.000092819035,0.10684459],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827933,0.00026800975,0.000055697037,0.00016976638,0.00090728636,0.00031994568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224323,0.0011778723,0.00062698056,0.00026687974,0.0024749506,0.0032099457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029751982,0.00030009978,0.00017915656,0.0010561827,0.0034611386,0.0009873962,0.0012410583,0.0007710257,0.012924335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008364634,0.00033520279,0.00017531878,0.0007410121,0.0010639066,0.00053015037,0.0014252628,0.0015441137,0.002116254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002347313,0.0025467984,0.016886206,0.00065641437,0.000006795155,0.001115081,0.025373088,0.0013650244,0.020205224,0.002701496,0.08007372,0.84883547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024254879,0.0031579467,0.41718182,0.0007908073,0.00003140514,0.0021324742,0.021092474,0.002578721,0.013101525,0.002857103,0.53662145,0.00021172558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13277976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41019976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8672202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014814896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041779246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26401383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595128131","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2273323","title":"Gender and Race in the Construction of 'Legal Professionalism': Historical Perspectives","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03678269491204473,"score_gpt":0.3664595970782667,"score_spread":0.329676902166222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595128131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29456803,0.02724466,0.007417867,0.08838674,0.0009771724,0.00004185201,0.000106849424,0.00002613847,0.5812307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878269,0.0024190762,0.00035133798,0.0011905299,0.00035237687,0.000014032558,0.000009248898,0.000019964687,0.007816723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968148,0.0018867195,0.000053875854,0.00034063772,0.00028094454,0.00062310655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923189,0.005890415,0.0005220953,0.00017927661,0.0005332982,0.00055593904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007521679,0.00025751244,0.00045946665,0.0027892124,0.009523303,0.009514532,0.0011785317,0.0031815004,0.006681224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009219557,0.00035433803,0.00022783359,0.0023699224,0.039843537,0.008543543,0.0040777605,0.0046131965,0.0002843219],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016956863,0.000019869214,0.0010807446,0.000028653936,0.0000020937446,0.00015397016,0.09480524,0.00004007098,0.000079583646,0.89526373,0.0011275044,0.0073815975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024145354,0.00009749034,0.0114437435,0.0008692858,0.000020521758,0.0010309306,0.19294842,0.00048293907,0.0007596463,0.43923494,0.3530217,0.000066293265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015772283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018727532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015772283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006067107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034093005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044020176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595495247","doi":"10.11575/prism/29758","title":"Open Access and the Open Access Authors Fund","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Medical education; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.577698823687253,"score_gpt":0.6107544825506229,"score_spread":0.03305565886336992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595495247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005122625,0.012958436,0.016618576,0.20718166,0.017203487,0.00025115913,0.0002733007,0.0007704615,0.73962027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20736763,0.015298162,0.029893583,0.041598044,0.016696082,0.0007193894,0.00048198664,0.00097317103,0.6869719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97453916,0.0046576066,0.0012099054,0.0013085883,0.015651884,0.0026327588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91452813,0.03131198,0.0074460506,0.011337858,0.019565623,0.015810322],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026117824,0.00040898632,0.0007386629,0.0027871865,0.0043778783,0.018312173,0.0019416682,0.009010673,0.03625391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11623457,0.0005386221,0.0004943558,0.0021795752,0.009952573,0.01644705,0.012553198,0.008874421,0.008366259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021166663,0.000018631303,0.00031677878,0.00006377403,0.0000062806957,0.00010807818,0.0005950772,0.000049187223,0.000073709736,0.8861634,0.07464577,0.03793817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012865528,0.00001830792,0.0006957099,0.00015418058,0.000007029728,0.00026443315,0.00027236287,0.00010145032,0.00011948423,0.070378296,0.9279531,0.000022752136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048189205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050582173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005577248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016607432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1381259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596681594","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1191","title":"Conceptualizing Reflective Practice for Legal Professionals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective practice; Conceptualization; Rigour; Engineering ethics; Legal practice; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.08073064703695744,"score_gpt":0.5121997335205556,"score_spread":0.43146908648359816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596681594","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026677523,0.02021385,0.49949077,0.12094451,0.0019985144,0.0011242299,0.000054431614,0.00041469283,0.3290815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6988169,0.01018563,0.26494724,0.008191908,0.0006803147,0.0022792872,0.00009555729,0.0002017282,0.014601346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89547765,0.08699592,0.0034582291,0.003790759,0.007428727,0.002848791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9324869,0.05066079,0.003767483,0.005532209,0.004860323,0.0026923572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059711862,0.0013388819,0.00093551684,0.007464991,0.009980988,0.026484394,0.0053270184,0.011431588,0.0033319152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056259077,0.00088859117,0.001336283,0.0044823317,0.08865191,0.033065747,0.013154434,0.010148167,0.0009642903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037630182,0.000020955631,0.00016770413,0.00013952692,0.0000055007577,0.00011881868,0.06545611,0.0003648151,0.000071737355,0.9259084,0.0011181827,0.006624612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021609556,0.000038440292,0.00017233694,0.0011695705,0.00000949171,0.00040597658,0.045408394,0.0014200561,0.00017378667,0.8148498,0.13629761,0.000032878972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00501466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025601035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059711862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015968403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0221503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3157903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596981095","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2436438","title":"Personal Plight Legal Practice and Tomorrow's Lawyers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Practice of law; Legal practice; Legal ethics; Political science; Legal profession; Psychology","score_opus":0.010239818862905894,"score_gpt":0.3277012573914401,"score_spread":0.31746143852853426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596981095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8259446,0.0008838569,0.00014516278,0.08963296,0.0002617292,0.00003113889,0.000043812273,0.000015181804,0.08304158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647163,0.00036906725,0.0000894731,0.007031269,0.000096430034,0.000016676868,0.000017035625,0.000009795703,0.027653977],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99482083,0.0015128787,0.00010904939,0.00044923436,0.00063715805,0.002470681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693382,0.0076338993,0.003960972,0.0006691379,0.0017811555,0.016616663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037256961,0.00011723048,0.00027972145,0.0011675734,0.018443199,0.008331853,0.0016675927,0.0050722514,0.03443895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027402466,0.00027645926,0.00026955162,0.0013310144,0.0064261477,0.005126238,0.0063052815,0.010469447,0.0013118639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028902292,0.0032234888,0.26107615,0.00009352164,0.000047322195,0.0041522877,0.40925533,0.00021351663,0.00047365518,0.09302217,0.088193804,0.13995974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069127585,0.00020190088,0.1281724,0.00027783698,0.000023392395,0.0008284661,0.7516256,0.00021578868,0.00023565243,0.011293585,0.10701358,0.000042530795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11509606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34564397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11509606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011112687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018309975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22885227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597300592","doi":"10.21991/c9bd53","title":"An Argument Against Accreditation of Trinity Western University's Proposed Law School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Accreditation; Consolidation (business); Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Management; Library science; Sociology; Medicine; Accounting; Computer science; Ethnology; Economics","score_opus":0.029456278135004763,"score_gpt":0.3230202419182415,"score_spread":0.29356396378323674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597300592","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030196521,0.00073300366,0.0018706206,0.63158995,0.0048496225,0.00017984034,0.00012311764,0.00017850498,0.3302788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4172414,0.00030742114,0.0020807108,0.384556,0.0031767741,0.0005614925,0.00008456896,0.00019067162,0.19180097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96676934,0.010219296,0.0013183801,0.0032904008,0.009454419,0.008948071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90183115,0.05132836,0.003808206,0.0067708483,0.022813248,0.013448159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039991483,0.00048694602,0.00088376726,0.0015934212,0.021786517,0.014717706,0.0046007833,0.043166425,0.021550344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1273673,0.001327572,0.00093860104,0.0014694716,0.017861657,0.007083384,0.009136704,0.0325246,0.0038229416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009405822,0.00009626093,0.0024259796,0.00005336702,0.000015469079,0.0002842792,0.004829618,0.00013976221,0.00022476006,0.6243512,0.3600322,0.007453103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026678212,0.00016957414,0.0109749315,0.00078953174,0.000081603066,0.00022198161,0.006888649,0.0012595751,0.0014745106,0.06760739,0.91002876,0.00023683875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15023452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25238898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98398316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016016863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05840913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29872012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597645875","doi":"","title":"The Psychology of Good Character","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Relevance (law); Pace; Context (archaeology); Psychological research; Psychology; Process (computing); Social psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028165679688652998,"score_gpt":0.3680531556319626,"score_spread":0.3398874759433096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597645875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095902964,0.008135354,0.0076374225,0.07120844,0.0006465525,0.000052324194,0.00009128409,0.00007023159,0.81625545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797951,0.0014355805,0.0008470459,0.0060070395,0.000100059195,0.000015975322,0.000017992052,0.000028296077,0.011752863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478793,0.0024892688,0.00009765409,0.00043689506,0.0013429808,0.00084530393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99365294,0.001969397,0.0008009953,0.00050079747,0.0014004995,0.0016754305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036992992,0.0002693723,0.00030451574,0.001390589,0.008267825,0.007477572,0.00083989714,0.0025997246,0.0054877545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007879137,0.00018372326,0.00022364953,0.0008691492,0.067450054,0.0039504734,0.0045529595,0.003352953,0.00074395625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029528397,0.000031140593,0.0045871637,0.000082392835,0.000014283332,0.0001889222,0.019426748,0.00021853873,0.00034402253,0.94304365,0.0090515,0.022982031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026767813,0.000112512316,0.026405498,0.00043231228,0.000026103662,0.00053020066,0.030058425,0.0005400498,0.0006135964,0.51774853,0.42340663,0.00009943675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10380224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0971306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10380224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011706452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009681013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2063961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159820614","doi":"10.29173/alr39","title":"The Great Disconnect: Reconnecting the Academy to the Profession","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Legal education; Legal profession; Law; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Sociology; Bridge (graph theory); Medicine","score_opus":0.06065598923198726,"score_gpt":0.41915576628218565,"score_spread":0.35849977705019836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159820614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036833264,0.023812868,0.00411633,0.6735987,0.005258862,0.000026230342,0.000020059477,0.00011430379,0.25621945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8167059,0.010832484,0.0032766904,0.119609326,0.0028455325,0.0000562865,0.000033701774,0.00012434584,0.046515767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.981703,0.008147727,0.00035446143,0.0011592404,0.004919415,0.0037162013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823229,0.006033488,0.0008613382,0.0012015261,0.002921331,0.0066595417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009817439,0.00023349289,0.00041752963,0.0031903305,0.026202774,0.016691776,0.0017397642,0.006053854,0.004899274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020404631,0.00036235957,0.0003711069,0.0019917786,0.0477056,0.017073158,0.015799057,0.013332315,0.00082523434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023847993,0.000042407675,0.001766642,0.00007539292,0.0000059603663,0.0003163882,0.04381141,0.00008852133,0.00014941815,0.83440125,0.058718484,0.060600176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016919952,0.00003878649,0.0031061417,0.00031476634,0.0000062247996,0.00032071111,0.054299474,0.00016227695,0.00009713564,0.18411969,0.75748456,0.000033408505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08679983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19427702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08679983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02346246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.063876584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17258918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598261752","doi":"","title":"What Is Access to Justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Economic Justice; Identity (music); Political science; Immigration; Criminology; Politics; Identity politics; Population; Race (biology); Compensation (psychology); Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04319766066247593,"score_gpt":0.431259581941641,"score_spread":0.38806192127916506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598261752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06110576,0.01797852,0.002244089,0.36524084,0.0012174128,0.000044330787,0.0007388211,0.00011523264,0.5513149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9502417,0.008182326,0.0004629882,0.019414483,0.0007376352,0.000028387927,0.00021406365,0.000057790323,0.020660648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99175745,0.001517694,0.00018755958,0.0005299526,0.0024809141,0.0035265356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98491377,0.0028187695,0.0010623554,0.00048365517,0.0037812134,0.006940252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032949145,0.00016799392,0.0005411214,0.0021029506,0.009809233,0.012455599,0.0014160918,0.002928689,0.028751174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022754326,0.00017234759,0.00038158736,0.0023625945,0.01198593,0.008951227,0.005106682,0.0032502336,0.0019993589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008004714,0.00016286569,0.043276217,0.000544276,0.00011880378,0.0010289983,0.038970612,0.00028320847,0.00032926528,0.5444518,0.13203827,0.23871572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025216057,0.00005932336,0.051501777,0.0028281144,0.000069024136,0.0008934461,0.06797774,0.00024012057,0.00021411503,0.24821465,0.6278885,0.00008787498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32209563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36416683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32209563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014008078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026635567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64044166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598901683","doi":"10.3968/7313","title":"The Application of Mutual Education Mode of College Students in the Teaching of Ideological and Moral Cultivation and Legal Basi","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Morality; Task (project management); Subjectivity; Charisma; Sociology; Mathematics education; Politics; Pedagogy; Cognition; Psychology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.051944131311207724,"score_gpt":0.45211179908929394,"score_spread":0.4001676677780862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598901683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7283568,0.00053735595,0.020892147,0.011364955,0.00042754653,0.00040541257,0.000015939606,0.00020003608,0.23779982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97784185,0.0001818786,0.004864271,0.0005912496,0.000037174763,0.00011893144,0.0000062120403,0.00001803544,0.016340464],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971957,0.0018457773,0.000057663074,0.00020137143,0.0002980829,0.00040136807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984848,0.00040785185,0.0001512181,0.00017565177,0.0002402987,0.0005402273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031442286,0.00027210842,0.00013540944,0.00046940608,0.0044810507,0.0029647974,0.00049813115,0.0009697691,0.0050277193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035140738,0.00018958452,0.0002746371,0.00025070395,0.003291856,0.0021843892,0.005222003,0.0022097677,0.00062671484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027369068,0.0022708208,0.025968019,0.00036354046,0.000016131464,0.00085958076,0.39887327,0.00036202665,0.0121504,0.2076036,0.016873384,0.33438557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000183317,0.0011644096,0.046844576,0.00059581076,0.000077215744,0.002657374,0.33087814,0.004922818,0.0144438725,0.088593595,0.50950766,0.00013128354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078950066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001982119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050277193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014816603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028757956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016819358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599219878","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1325051","title":"Learning to Act Like a Lawyer: A Model Code of Professional Responsiblity for Law Students","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Code (set theory); Legal ethics; Professional responsibility; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.0357963517469291,"score_gpt":0.44387019972713815,"score_spread":0.40807384798020907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599219878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6546224,0.000058008543,0.05937212,0.03942727,0.00023525633,0.00080886646,0.00019963202,0.00027636348,0.24500006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96648484,0.000023941528,0.015995044,0.0007234143,0.000016720063,0.00027398634,0.00005100375,0.000040465435,0.01639059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99423945,0.0028504578,0.00018025267,0.0005619078,0.0014818446,0.00068603456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97349644,0.0108646685,0.0020399957,0.0036120326,0.0044948547,0.0054919934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005732453,0.00030602913,0.0002555046,0.00081724493,0.0062580947,0.0074312347,0.001619302,0.0048040114,0.012795637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0286711,0.00027874974,0.0005603878,0.0005501597,0.007679354,0.0048452993,0.004487364,0.0042058867,0.0016252586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023779288,0.0020842352,0.03106696,0.00007636339,0.000010812499,0.00029383056,0.06278843,0.004398286,0.0016030038,0.8050298,0.016705139,0.075705275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003872454,0.0012224308,0.04189024,0.00042313823,0.00006257625,0.00073080044,0.09960816,0.124795884,0.00449225,0.6040469,0.12198757,0.0003528594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017715385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028551579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017715385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007514677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0213677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05452299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600378010","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1593709","title":"No Longer a Moot Point: The Importance of Advocacy in the Law School Curriculum","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Law; Political science; Legal education; Point (geometry); Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010132058736522172,"score_gpt":0.3300269255124898,"score_spread":0.3198948667759676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600378010","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09495178,0.0033792586,0.0039537763,0.78505075,0.0020473879,0.000049361744,0.000024119268,0.00005553427,0.11048812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92748016,0.0020448412,0.003699679,0.04934877,0.0009649574,0.00011950616,0.000023572522,0.00011919306,0.016199319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984045,0.010221095,0.00032096944,0.0008683681,0.0030297753,0.0015147671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95773345,0.02583813,0.0018950817,0.0010577101,0.003850718,0.009624886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026619771,0.00023719929,0.00045791114,0.001364898,0.016182035,0.016805269,0.0018003345,0.007829408,0.011175838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04987172,0.0005745438,0.0003132074,0.0009280749,0.02015447,0.01464834,0.01148376,0.016993767,0.0009931958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008850618,0.00066022173,0.019788204,0.0003761283,0.000028909772,0.00054616877,0.21682467,0.00018130359,0.0011111548,0.46876094,0.10156192,0.19007188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007236032,0.00016763547,0.018514177,0.0015031305,0.000043515865,0.00043433486,0.22942919,0.0009132454,0.0011187369,0.30733424,0.44038612,0.00008331141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007231874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01757988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026619771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063091693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020642644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14078051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602203480","doi":"","title":"Desert Island Disks (Ten Reveries on Pedagogy in Law and the Humanities)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); Representation (politics); Legal education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08573710240636744,"score_gpt":0.4135320981597265,"score_spread":0.3277949957533591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602203480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011709825,0.0863003,0.001846269,0.15012011,0.020030752,0.00004431153,0.00015616637,0.00018219763,0.72961015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15741554,0.032786787,0.0018724796,0.028610803,0.0050580506,0.000082670755,0.000096263524,0.0002092024,0.77386826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949706,0.00021183376,0.000013429366,0.00007100132,0.00013085369,0.00007583435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946016,0.0001976954,0.00002975293,0.00005800417,0.00008619122,0.00016822701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010229704,0.00034727363,0.00026761365,0.0008435413,0.0054425625,0.0048583024,0.0005955569,0.0019223858,0.02020534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017076699,0.00015870051,0.00019124395,0.0006463564,0.005127092,0.0027334823,0.0034140912,0.0030049714,0.0028937124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031314063,0.000052894236,0.0005642351,0.00013333368,0.000005744509,0.0002663907,0.011453149,0.00010176067,0.0004518159,0.22027408,0.66675985,0.09990532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017917365,0.00000388122,0.00035962395,0.000098640434,9.420165e-7,0.00003550239,0.0024762459,0.000017328692,0.000062229774,0.005606059,0.99133575,0.000001983907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018825285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052561697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02020534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039972183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028180974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067593634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602420943","doi":"","title":"Client Engagement Inside Collaborative Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Table (database); Power (physics); Psychology; Public relations; Law; Business; Political science; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.040701017122308385,"score_gpt":0.3636248303685782,"score_spread":0.3229238132462698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602420943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8763597,0.0011622678,0.01424723,0.01428854,0.00020798824,0.00018956988,0.000040474657,0.00035401052,0.09315024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99129194,0.00029350145,0.0009890519,0.0007807493,0.000038456445,0.00007606066,0.000015551444,0.00006789691,0.006446864],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91914225,0.061783757,0.001114753,0.0026965796,0.008077088,0.0071855113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9495036,0.03551749,0.0032097187,0.0032440126,0.0031973135,0.0053278776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019216686,0.0007282093,0.0012095113,0.0016134284,0.024091417,0.017200561,0.0041317856,0.0065400456,0.011699663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06745428,0.0009392773,0.0006996475,0.001765419,0.020762354,0.011138728,0.02039354,0.008752766,0.0018091885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045703906,0.00013969785,0.002837421,0.0000698395,0.000011834104,0.0012922742,0.9639066,0.00011773503,0.00059080246,0.008901603,0.0020857821,0.020000787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018926088,0.00018801967,0.0015144872,0.0002248147,0.000018103474,0.0023676085,0.93482864,0.0008263758,0.0012016143,0.006939997,0.05181213,0.00005934191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00688725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059716254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024091417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066786646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007760804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10162878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602899680","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2389410","title":"Data and Diversity in the Canadian Justice Community","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Political science; Geography; Economic Justice; Law","score_opus":0.10637775571388833,"score_gpt":0.3859663544433065,"score_spread":0.2795885987294182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602899680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8079766,0.004448925,0.0020648947,0.10224911,0.00028732515,0.00017548993,0.002451155,0.00005349726,0.08029295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935423,0.0006228273,0.00045968356,0.0018851608,0.000042325486,0.000029975276,0.00023122963,0.000018039198,0.0031685077],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9591444,0.01178778,0.0015831217,0.0036043455,0.01497198,0.008908325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8260923,0.06893822,0.010255051,0.007957057,0.059094027,0.027663318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03216334,0.00028853436,0.001069078,0.012490399,0.03624068,0.015978094,0.0044292673,0.0026416967,0.009646071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16196984,0.0005628668,0.0004315624,0.021384051,0.018468635,0.005470211,0.013201387,0.0037257061,0.00026659505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029422875,0.00023600104,0.28725827,0.00044054654,0.00017585607,0.0010243907,0.4011213,0.0010845751,0.00031866477,0.1473248,0.045050226,0.11567121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006872095,0.00007614975,0.25900587,0.0018610242,0.00013657374,0.00035739806,0.49708077,0.0019411587,0.0003880474,0.05958149,0.17920479,0.00029799325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98646796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091115125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091115125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2059186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6610896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604261762","doi":"","title":"\"Uncivil by Too Much Civility\"?: Critiquing Five More Years of Civility Regulation in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Incivility; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.013304375262363983,"score_gpt":0.3136089962000193,"score_spread":0.3003046209376553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604261762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2818947,0.019660382,0.003541046,0.4988521,0.0023137217,0.00019844579,0.00021223068,0.00010974394,0.19321766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92237425,0.0049606827,0.0013583212,0.05046214,0.00027284067,0.00006028781,0.0000565087,0.00011871957,0.02033635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9690072,0.0066340086,0.00092543353,0.0024092812,0.01161304,0.009411121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93920124,0.02358998,0.002593765,0.0015451314,0.023956016,0.009113846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0258417,0.00065205514,0.0009571932,0.0051807696,0.087977014,0.023766067,0.0075140083,0.0128354225,0.0037098534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052076038,0.0009096049,0.0009714535,0.006642079,0.03702176,0.0066627334,0.009784994,0.022321269,0.00023412422],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000877387,0.000102961225,0.017276667,0.000289497,0.00006122176,0.0021173642,0.4169267,0.0010166963,0.00053344487,0.44213495,0.07542792,0.044024814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003518671,0.000058948004,0.027748078,0.0010787601,0.00011235118,0.00034977452,0.33005482,0.0017209669,0.0006875413,0.027338468,0.61046904,0.00034601885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99773103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39263678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.39263678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43869776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70445526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605124053","doi":"10.1002/bsl.592","title":"Australian lawyers' views on competency issues in older adults","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Edith Cowan University","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Affect (linguistics); Population; Legal advice; Psychology; Legal service; Older people; Public relations; Social psychology; Law; Actuarial science; Business; Medicine; Gerontology; Political science","score_opus":0.12062080170516577,"score_gpt":0.4619018960924455,"score_spread":0.3412810943872797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605124053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9727774,0.0014451393,0.00008917814,0.01738984,0.00008365272,0.000025790956,0.00001695684,0.000003519839,0.008168495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99261487,0.0013694189,0.00008611904,0.0033988396,0.00009951729,0.000018956382,0.000009906112,0.0000028503875,0.0023994707],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99106324,0.0048722485,0.0005683524,0.00021781825,0.0020632993,0.0012150618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756277,0.009614595,0.0059370412,0.0004264909,0.004306541,0.004087606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0123310415,0.00016175235,0.0004267508,0.0018279047,0.0060442872,0.0034538994,0.00072809553,0.0022373463,0.0032828005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045190085,0.00039726307,0.000269455,0.0016828945,0.005090355,0.002832535,0.004737448,0.0029128015,0.0002814764],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041029067,0.000059741138,0.045267157,0.00011691562,0.000007710089,0.0012100541,0.9300451,0.000023789027,0.0005677373,0.0013017437,0.0032562013,0.018102797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011319517,0.00017716365,0.10740758,0.00035114703,0.000011594385,0.0010781483,0.8621548,0.00008813005,0.00016385694,0.0008163292,0.027711738,0.000028300183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06315528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.082353726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06315528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049019014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050949887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12557536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605343510","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2605","title":"Learning the 'How' of the Law: Teaching Procedure and Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Underpinning; Vocational education; Curriculum; Legal education; Subject (documents); Law; Civil law (Civil law); Civil procedure; Economic Justice; Political science; Common law; Mathematics education; Sociology; Commercial law; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Computer science; Psychology; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.01588365844373171,"score_gpt":0.31845635201931716,"score_spread":0.30257269357558547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605343510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53015006,0.0060065384,0.041291725,0.04150859,0.00035763235,0.00015797542,0.000021007416,0.000121433106,0.38038507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756409,0.0021387043,0.0064828508,0.0017669763,0.000042027503,0.00003648113,0.00001426287,0.000022747181,0.013855111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969085,0.001583865,0.000050627637,0.00017618618,0.00060487544,0.00067595957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956376,0.0025821002,0.00037558234,0.00015195897,0.0002271791,0.0010256335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003338073,0.00019521888,0.00018810782,0.00077986234,0.007929272,0.005179804,0.0010294734,0.0017434194,0.003411054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066990736,0.00016332355,0.00018538653,0.0006519066,0.02043846,0.0029539426,0.0049459697,0.0029530958,0.0004534171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026484571,0.00040627707,0.0077060685,0.0002819436,0.0000057709617,0.00064162025,0.252018,0.001084284,0.0020137976,0.44946384,0.008226487,0.27812544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027185715,0.00030000022,0.027003922,0.0011407272,0.000012451846,0.0010613801,0.28415895,0.0014346291,0.0027018618,0.1189833,0.5631175,0.000058174668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085127845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22569053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085127845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013593788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02431427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16926467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608617439","doi":"10.24908/ss.v12i1.5194","title":"The Problem with Ethics: Difficulties in Constructing Normative Frameworks","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.020655802091644495,"score_gpt":0.3354027644885484,"score_spread":0.3147469623969039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608617439","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012462092,0.005943866,0.16906323,0.60256165,0.0026338277,0.0001794121,0.00014217604,0.00020486231,0.20680885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77873355,0.0031431199,0.13421212,0.06809668,0.0033388115,0.0011285088,0.000120162644,0.0003612156,0.010865837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.86963814,0.10380082,0.0039603924,0.004530801,0.015875868,0.002194007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79933,0.15136117,0.0070563015,0.013175179,0.025528574,0.0035487541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13448326,0.00083717576,0.0014792024,0.004957642,0.012732606,0.017868577,0.005388305,0.0117626395,0.005139599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19608562,0.00079554797,0.00094844727,0.0034583076,0.08459862,0.026774922,0.00987308,0.020966085,0.0012850949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036724448,0.000008092963,0.0001264911,0.000029813646,0.000004909992,0.00001984862,0.0030268491,0.00009268629,0.0000150196765,0.9867122,0.00597637,0.003983954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007185115,0.0000045162146,0.00012680147,0.00019044652,0.0000039587103,0.000046129222,0.0035267507,0.00043593065,0.0000642133,0.9757152,0.019865884,0.000012836245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007468599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008569383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13448326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0090158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01814288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71122396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1609243848","doi":"","title":"Challenging the Existing Paradigm: How to Transnationalize the Legal Curriculum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Curriculum; Vision; Legal education; Presentation (obstetrics); Legal research; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.060860206944277864,"score_gpt":0.3973655496232002,"score_spread":0.33650534267892235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1609243848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15037619,0.0073077464,0.14187641,0.22926848,0.0020852655,0.00028316933,0.000054519474,0.00039442285,0.46835375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86997485,0.003280629,0.089798026,0.017312933,0.00017846431,0.00033384,0.00006637805,0.00029246145,0.01876246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887933,0.0077717225,0.00031654656,0.0010931141,0.0012315986,0.0007937814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942443,0.0015415875,0.00044575674,0.0011218069,0.0012559718,0.0013905868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012814643,0.0003634343,0.00041102033,0.0012535792,0.0069285845,0.011819268,0.0017914209,0.0028000975,0.0076108957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01420651,0.00033408808,0.00056010694,0.0010917947,0.014128218,0.02329418,0.011694745,0.0077272383,0.0012641673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019046234,0.00010965662,0.0021987427,0.00014844733,0.000020778858,0.00011993999,0.04131475,0.00040896962,0.0009095532,0.85754716,0.0068635573,0.0903394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045760997,0.00019016635,0.003291656,0.0007422967,0.00004612752,0.00034417902,0.10648124,0.0020467145,0.0010966114,0.49598786,0.3896868,0.000040664283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070535787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0152498465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012814643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006048666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015769456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06777114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1610584657","doi":"","title":"Back to Where We Started? The Expansion of the Saskatchewan Justice Alternative Measures Guidelines as an Opportunity to Explore Program Delivery Issues","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law","score_opus":0.07204855626718464,"score_gpt":0.2989265851503175,"score_spread":0.22687802888313285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1610584657","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050522387,0.0027950513,0.027262999,0.7559,0.004263953,0.0015612597,0.0015267595,0.0006291934,0.15553851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3498769,0.0044291937,0.11803099,0.3402331,0.0004176765,0.0046643997,0.0011601704,0.00086482737,0.1803228],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721444,0.012979903,0.0022242642,0.0012704685,0.0067406185,0.0046402495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89409304,0.04473403,0.003878882,0.0050898497,0.042930733,0.009273426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04429708,0.0005305126,0.0007528329,0.0028336882,0.011842631,0.013833231,0.004291642,0.0073540956,0.01238102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08759636,0.0014076823,0.00094609446,0.0039890828,0.0051212236,0.008179124,0.008174263,0.020327786,0.0015945709],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017528818,0.0006777699,0.018671818,0.00075783196,0.000091955,0.0011999052,0.027918763,0.0017099151,0.004499425,0.21462452,0.4819815,0.24769136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017971358,0.00024825346,0.053210348,0.003549825,0.00013252917,0.00051430374,0.050682332,0.001963147,0.0042584073,0.04106813,0.8437262,0.0004667087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73928136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94967234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9492619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050738085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24870291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5245081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1619378921","doi":"","title":"Where's Omar? Where Is Justice?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.21323367412326663,"score_gpt":0.4006327016567138,"score_spread":0.18739902753344714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1619378921","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008671072,0.0063779256,0.00028053095,0.7708484,0.008033738,0.00002369913,0.00010485645,0.000067253946,0.20559253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30243513,0.011792297,0.00088746275,0.32205507,0.004087982,0.00005128749,0.00012525996,0.00014488261,0.3584206],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785787,0.00059108844,0.00007294393,0.00022733248,0.00031673888,0.0009339673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752754,0.00049355876,0.00019950955,0.00010064005,0.0006042712,0.0010743563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017865186,0.0003070886,0.0003982854,0.0007432742,0.027666235,0.009739622,0.0008780771,0.0066867643,0.044555683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073960167,0.0002469193,0.00022868365,0.0007742071,0.0066495705,0.00839277,0.004136405,0.007544606,0.009812179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002887583,0.00005496989,0.0022976045,0.000095662144,0.000006269762,0.0011299395,0.014607109,0.000015453832,0.00015143307,0.11231823,0.8338918,0.035402704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005600206,0.000020826945,0.0025133344,0.0003511505,0.000008676897,0.00070963136,0.05221316,0.00004244614,0.0001626677,0.01608356,0.92786276,0.000026067866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037923235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10557565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044555683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005030378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069009294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14905363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1634339657","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1166","title":"Searching for the Constitutional Core of Access to Justice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Justiciability; Law; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.3668446990512506,"score_gpt":0.5075296711308575,"score_spread":0.14068497207960684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1634339657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09524713,0.018940974,0.06997272,0.23384966,0.00037877186,0.00009325619,0.00010097535,0.00007324231,0.5813433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752143,0.004387035,0.00594988,0.006961809,0.00026897652,0.00006396238,0.000028569542,0.000014346774,0.0071112234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99093163,0.003543569,0.00041917624,0.0010824515,0.0025751437,0.0014479638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988118,0.008748371,0.0008740053,0.0006297854,0.0011002892,0.0005295648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011260461,0.00017491987,0.0007012796,0.0021850835,0.0055235727,0.008259388,0.0016045688,0.0050134133,0.0032639678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02002621,0.0003304418,0.00035607675,0.0015619218,0.039872825,0.011463451,0.005269501,0.008288341,0.0002955522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.223882e-7,0.0000029551725,0.00009242562,0.000011265555,0.0000010705794,0.000017458788,0.00042478237,0.00007743446,0.00004477521,0.9971565,0.00019010628,0.0019804635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053471263,0.000009496661,0.00042588142,0.0001124432,0.0000051895067,0.000028548062,0.00096218317,0.00023085493,0.00015568032,0.9779528,0.02010148,0.000010142739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03616915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042163607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03616915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012079774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022338133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08764529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W165177754","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1193","title":"Law Student, Heal Thyself: The Role and Responsibility of Clinical Education Programs in Promoting Self-Care","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Context (archaeology); Legal profession; Mental health; Psychology; Addiction; Political science; Medical education; Nursing; Public relations; Medicine; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.07293553762130897,"score_gpt":0.4943147035579832,"score_spread":0.42137916593667424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W165177754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3039433,0.008142045,0.0048284414,0.57522976,0.0024311456,0.00037870812,0.00002691659,0.0001693316,0.10485029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610908,0.003898995,0.0048006005,0.021536337,0.0005607487,0.00022182406,0.000018668587,0.000031440166,0.007840588],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98880297,0.008199387,0.00016977327,0.00031325527,0.0011796486,0.0013349259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95030636,0.012176936,0.0023821546,0.0009974169,0.0033831226,0.030753972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014409561,0.00018790257,0.00027967957,0.00078125554,0.0064320113,0.007411537,0.0013451902,0.0031116784,0.007879305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035661213,0.00025146978,0.00020769982,0.00036956955,0.0044097784,0.0040301457,0.0073971017,0.0054771677,0.0008141797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105877385,0.004810399,0.0686729,0.00057566323,0.000036545815,0.0008801849,0.05236624,0.00019691305,0.0007712391,0.024208216,0.0650213,0.7823546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003466425,0.0031403766,0.19981776,0.008430806,0.00010241194,0.0044582444,0.30987638,0.002845111,0.0022276442,0.06168557,0.40679282,0.0002762144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035834138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011526797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014409561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023652867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026500925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07620591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1654198160","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00393.x","title":"<i>Lives of Lawyers Revisited: Transformation and Resilience in the Organization of Practice</i> . By Michael J. Kelly. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2007. Pp. 414. $159.95 cloth; $24.95 paper.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; General partnership; Queen (butterfly); Citation; Practice of law; Law; Legal profession; Political science","score_opus":0.0120746073953751,"score_gpt":0.294260964231898,"score_spread":0.28218635683652293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1654198160","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007754,0.32980072,0.0004986391,0.629428,0.0015713504,0.000013842819,0.000048669368,0.000025298552,0.030859375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6442334,0.2821234,0.0009385682,0.051194288,0.0034009728,0.00012387925,0.00010239106,0.000053401076,0.017829865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930369,0.0050148657,0.00015624479,0.0003126781,0.0006861559,0.00079311413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921887,0.004181383,0.0014136684,0.0003038182,0.000718569,0.0011939708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005537441,0.00051592424,0.00044955255,0.0023007877,0.0053840796,0.0131701715,0.0015426442,0.0050975373,0.0064162724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012453858,0.00050682045,0.00038636033,0.0033052752,0.032247197,0.019559007,0.006768642,0.0056131016,0.00094085466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049687696,0.000070387745,0.0022192404,0.0010799285,0.00003769184,0.00040615862,0.10783587,0.00027625135,0.00016486403,0.4167526,0.35547897,0.115628354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001754877,0.000052263193,0.008307591,0.0036478478,0.00001457541,0.00045816833,0.13131207,0.00016116122,0.000115817464,0.28420654,0.57166636,0.000040030904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015316764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025892688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015316764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084365755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011631382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061211944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1661029240","doi":"","title":"Rape Shield Laws: Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Witness; Sexual assault; Legislation; Notice; Political science; Common law; Admissible evidence; Supreme court; Parliament; Sexual history; Criminology; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Politics","score_opus":0.01173766262400714,"score_gpt":0.30522863438993614,"score_spread":0.293490971765929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1661029240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012002049,0.0178701,0.00068318046,0.075107306,0.0033690769,0.0006086004,0.013326304,0.00046592345,0.8765673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07097724,0.019315613,0.0016978567,0.056482323,0.00074045407,0.00039559483,0.006314975,0.0002781553,0.8437978],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99238247,0.00019215957,0.00019696579,0.0006100203,0.004531043,0.002087306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99050564,0.00076366396,0.00034141474,0.00029283934,0.0060546105,0.0020418903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022629036,0.0008161445,0.00056594313,0.0047698184,0.016546037,0.007074211,0.0037240307,0.0064684157,0.074079886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009746701,0.0012142041,0.00089621526,0.0047795186,0.0035006232,0.00188246,0.0031548082,0.0066886875,0.010566484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025541554,0.00005906812,0.003581153,0.00028434774,0.000013875014,0.00056939636,0.0013440163,0.0002139927,0.00027844348,0.12761818,0.8197217,0.046290237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014644994,0.00000855426,0.0078078476,0.0002582351,0.000009326438,0.00009595316,0.00041642928,0.00007786977,0.000088034605,0.0013348656,0.98986036,0.000027913418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98858845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11317545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11317545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30069575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82114923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1661050030","doi":"","title":"Positivist Legal Ethics Theory and the Law Governing Lawyers: A Few Puzzles Worth Solving","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hofstra law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal ethics; Law; Legal positivism; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Legal profession; Sociology; Legal realism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04481532221732027,"score_gpt":0.3895861595395608,"score_spread":0.3447708373222405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1661050030","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061867237,0.041543294,0.013711671,0.89519906,0.0015560098,0.000016544329,0.000051409104,0.00005372169,0.041681617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.680578,0.06723483,0.028525595,0.16900605,0.017715864,0.0003443038,0.00019439199,0.00030568155,0.036095247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344313,0.003683496,0.00018053445,0.00072560675,0.0014776151,0.0004896772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97816783,0.015759885,0.001109916,0.0015945717,0.0018490531,0.0015188305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014250464,0.0007212163,0.0013489646,0.002065425,0.005738865,0.011585861,0.00383104,0.0121337995,0.008921615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018129082,0.0006299435,0.0009504398,0.0022873136,0.061665706,0.030767165,0.005026811,0.019830208,0.0020233218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008459187,0.000025020157,0.00013156442,0.0000719452,0.000006417556,0.000030154406,0.0011652304,0.00012646648,0.000026346303,0.98512036,0.008712654,0.0045753093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010505448,0.0000052358464,0.000093227376,0.000140175,0.0000015141376,0.000024845025,0.00086892163,0.00016344822,0.000018196799,0.9808218,0.017845055,0.000007073596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044963197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051664882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014250464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007130369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060361363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07536453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1665552844","doi":"","title":"Cinderella at the Ball: Legislative Intent in Canadian Courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislative history; Parliament; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law; Legislative intent; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.1179023299821157,"score_gpt":0.3909925532770402,"score_spread":0.2730902232949245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1665552844","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023057418,0.5137028,0.0018074742,0.15020725,0.0024635459,0.00011332008,0.0006032759,0.000047023088,0.30799785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4836382,0.42612013,0.0025518565,0.03741217,0.0009767332,0.000096443684,0.00042652816,0.00007279319,0.04870521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859805,0.0021546094,0.00049472577,0.0007139908,0.009245783,0.0014104261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775573,0.0060829823,0.0011025063,0.0005044047,0.013698274,0.0010544526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010823206,0.0003527973,0.0005309618,0.0079045985,0.012611659,0.008766457,0.0016723609,0.0021741972,0.003860388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031566933,0.0003549016,0.00040902104,0.012822029,0.014046136,0.0034094413,0.0024926874,0.0039030712,0.00040581918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041612464,0.000022494403,0.004695971,0.0023653042,0.000044141514,0.00024302145,0.035837073,0.00046768796,0.00026076077,0.58954036,0.1548488,0.21163282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011466481,0.000020103775,0.01775534,0.0056017255,0.000100889585,0.00010773288,0.014390003,0.00013005975,0.00032814773,0.014313111,0.9471485,0.000092947834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98883504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110682935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110682935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2923704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80306464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1682106982","doi":"10.29173/alr2672","title":"Imperfect Duty: Lawyers’ Obligation to Foster Access to Justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Imperfect; Economic Justice; Duty; Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.09521076546473202,"score_gpt":0.4533340618716132,"score_spread":0.3581232964068812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1682106982","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035619672,0.17497887,0.01015665,0.5100719,0.0016064317,0.000089625624,0.000054610988,0.000041419218,0.26738092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83227396,0.05323919,0.0029104906,0.08897866,0.0016802881,0.00007735423,0.00003505352,0.000024922514,0.020780051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9682068,0.016805418,0.0012129535,0.0019716052,0.0092003755,0.0026027437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93965137,0.04400734,0.0064424053,0.002608036,0.0056794416,0.0016113763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019517645,0.00020882634,0.0006475824,0.0016603683,0.0036863498,0.008158452,0.002027426,0.010252937,0.0032581417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05011163,0.00044382663,0.00046244398,0.0013673941,0.025192631,0.008187674,0.004403003,0.008242227,0.00039489678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009898495,0.000020488476,0.0007205877,0.00034042195,0.000028298726,0.000087142354,0.0012879468,0.00028879405,0.00014043578,0.96860373,0.009014913,0.019457303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005961793,0.00009049958,0.010025138,0.003615593,0.00012681914,0.000295486,0.0033089377,0.0007922611,0.00058297423,0.70050824,0.28052792,0.0000665614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031203303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047323298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031203303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013083395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0185937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1032204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W16877511","doi":"10.1529/biophysj.106.088716","title":"Taking precedents seriously: The influence of stare decisis on judicial decision-making.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biophysical Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Public Health Service; University of Toronto; General Electric","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.030510275189534617,"score_gpt":0.3969540149379223,"score_spread":0.3664437397483877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W16877511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35175258,0.014439929,0.009248508,0.28999144,0.0023448134,0.0001345896,0.00025069655,0.000087128516,0.3317504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98348355,0.0014644227,0.0012667384,0.009083624,0.00034456837,0.000036134883,0.000021554953,0.000021216038,0.0042782645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844036,0.010137841,0.0004045248,0.001450836,0.0015471303,0.0020560909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9003474,0.07326861,0.0073418044,0.0029179056,0.005890274,0.010234029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027575223,0.0002851488,0.00045381708,0.001298136,0.00578398,0.0066018854,0.0013739504,0.004845934,0.01110684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12892663,0.00028246356,0.00035987332,0.0007744971,0.01207632,0.00557453,0.004684572,0.005648675,0.0006949022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096792437,0.00043280717,0.048012804,0.00030561283,0.000242984,0.003367965,0.026722899,0.0029170264,0.0007544265,0.69017583,0.07649561,0.14960417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019993803,0.00031283128,0.0312874,0.0008756836,0.00014534361,0.00087187375,0.023931304,0.0054733153,0.0011727622,0.77875084,0.15681984,0.00015889801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008648003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012952177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027575223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004537187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008767054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14583349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1696780779","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1190","title":"Framing Supervisory Relationships in Clinical Law: The Role of Critical Pedagogy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Political science; Law; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.15555622381080705,"score_gpt":0.4989572005660606,"score_spread":0.3434009767552535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1696780779","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1802982,0.013702095,0.13928987,0.35504824,0.0039687664,0.0008115714,0.000019524883,0.00032439656,0.30653733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97149163,0.0026364368,0.013581598,0.005212561,0.0006855413,0.00031234528,0.000008334189,0.00005905073,0.0060125915],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9538463,0.04029136,0.00047783952,0.0013871532,0.0018599211,0.0021374281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9313432,0.052587062,0.0035608537,0.0019065182,0.0022881592,0.008314204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033232413,0.00062746427,0.00051947095,0.0031249404,0.017456515,0.017743811,0.002930334,0.0058803717,0.0043773423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053252492,0.00060376286,0.00041665017,0.0011815706,0.06927093,0.015236267,0.018129015,0.013136174,0.0004948463],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023758095,0.00023831219,0.0020429124,0.00024130724,0.000007694133,0.000523308,0.4829774,0.00037896165,0.00027640088,0.460706,0.0062542246,0.04632983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073868134,0.0002194899,0.002409323,0.0020229334,0.000013221756,0.00060576637,0.40565652,0.0012612799,0.00066775456,0.4463033,0.14070284,0.00006375932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039412715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00624154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033232413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014059205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029053152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17575186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W170816581","doi":"10.29173/alr33","title":"The Future of Law School: Three Visions and a Prediction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Polity; Legal profession; Law; Variety (cybernetics); Scholarship; Political science; Legal education; Practice of law; Focus (optics); Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Politics","score_opus":0.024358472118028687,"score_gpt":0.3538486937060262,"score_spread":0.3294902215879975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W170816581","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027288275,0.020780835,0.009049554,0.78659075,0.0026639637,0.00006874231,0.00021297047,0.00017921568,0.15316568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94794405,0.012431568,0.005094289,0.02682329,0.0019864186,0.00016431678,0.00016383719,0.00004928408,0.005342925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99363226,0.00226753,0.00020009001,0.0007889592,0.0019615062,0.0011497136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982443,0.00737224,0.0019333042,0.0011575806,0.003392516,0.0037012883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011032107,0.0008647042,0.0006447975,0.0028611503,0.0051486497,0.012106126,0.002477608,0.006974253,0.005076139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014211525,0.000432231,0.0005718624,0.0020040113,0.031481683,0.028827192,0.008026799,0.011776139,0.0007805032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000509728,0.00009697914,0.002024929,0.00012057032,0.000007897469,0.00006952965,0.002118069,0.00060883677,0.000050596776,0.9591132,0.018647568,0.017090905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029879566,0.000056934678,0.0029702699,0.00032641328,0.0000104331675,0.0001218887,0.009031802,0.0018655196,0.00009940176,0.9447781,0.040649887,0.000059474267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011139622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010475614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012106126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009182407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009678133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06662333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W171191924","doi":"10.29173/alr40","title":"Are Clinics a Magic Bullet?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Boston College","keywords":"Legal education; Magic bullet; Experiential education; MAGIC (telescope); Experiential learning; Law; Legal psychology; Legal realism; Legal profession; Legal practice; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.061434037296869026,"score_gpt":0.41802818302096556,"score_spread":0.35659414572409653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W171191924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014228286,0.077159904,0.0006360202,0.90019774,0.004076302,0.000032563687,0.000031822183,0.000034156405,0.016408708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08727108,0.10011857,0.0020140642,0.7858955,0.008312794,0.00019164204,0.00006584681,0.0000783606,0.016052138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97354805,0.014532982,0.00083414273,0.0023360515,0.0061851935,0.0025635522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93330926,0.04717822,0.0042912015,0.0015817673,0.006965434,0.006674138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026119377,0.0003202204,0.00071523216,0.0013240738,0.0043850024,0.010283598,0.003052276,0.017857801,0.01787304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06652692,0.00052874873,0.00086253916,0.001639126,0.020065647,0.013632667,0.0027259237,0.017104715,0.0020836508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077504956,0.00012361833,0.0015729555,0.0017180843,0.00003622351,0.00031581317,0.0022323108,0.00017113068,0.00015958986,0.52143764,0.33739877,0.13475633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000124246,0.00012302038,0.0022462788,0.004203519,0.000047969166,0.00036725242,0.0042541395,0.00011081853,0.00011224252,0.054551467,0.9338179,0.00004120643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06804745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09401568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06804745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016933605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04063306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13813412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17120724","doi":"","title":"Innovation in Legal Studies Education: An Integrated Case Study Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socratic method; Legal research; Legal education; Popularity; Empirical legal studies; Legal writing; Meaning (existential); Jury; Curriculum; Common law; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.20105023050388893,"score_gpt":0.5029591158194794,"score_spread":0.30190888531559046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17120724","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28178182,0.006383862,0.40558454,0.030501178,0.0004885324,0.0027813516,0.00009723622,0.0003501407,0.27203134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80452204,0.0023709815,0.18140312,0.0013595963,0.00013466089,0.0013087572,0.000056263696,0.00003781161,0.008806807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771624,0.018045526,0.00053347636,0.0008368923,0.0023519646,0.0010696776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683575,0.025184955,0.0013163098,0.0014521905,0.0018315037,0.0018574843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018461289,0.000540294,0.00062145945,0.007048874,0.0042740484,0.010093755,0.0037387523,0.0043246304,0.0067290864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015978131,0.0005302224,0.00067632576,0.0042169713,0.01068192,0.009622903,0.01207272,0.0035928036,0.0005123497],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068327994,0.002588274,0.006484502,0.0007121937,0.000029244471,0.0018911638,0.05282441,0.0035567773,0.0012345187,0.6426969,0.0057195737,0.28219405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027424248,0.0011840217,0.007866229,0.0036505319,0.000105168154,0.002883427,0.10719558,0.050394256,0.004650178,0.5939951,0.22765867,0.00014262181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091481756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021755842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018461289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00684031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073973783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09763378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1719239166","doi":"","title":"Honouring Social Justice: Honouring Dianne Martin","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Champion; Economic Justice; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Portrait; Criminology; History","score_opus":0.06489647806253972,"score_gpt":0.3790788858516241,"score_spread":0.31418240778908435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1719239166","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075830724,0.09305426,0.0023922864,0.49437666,0.00999044,0.00005091507,0.000041805935,0.00012755071,0.39238298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10343939,0.029414836,0.002386656,0.073684424,0.0019718185,0.00009111354,0.000029841221,0.00013865491,0.78884333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861455,0.00056205573,0.000019673822,0.000120675264,0.00049157505,0.00019152662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990388,0.00046455313,0.000052998563,0.00004028167,0.00017870135,0.00022475152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018289456,0.00035253388,0.0002962281,0.00088245963,0.007539648,0.0042349505,0.00066801824,0.0022514295,0.0032306307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026739622,0.00030224005,0.00015927842,0.00071100635,0.0072497283,0.0042365086,0.0028318535,0.005935012,0.0010411722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011933625,0.000023768409,0.00027193164,0.00008900671,0.0000021161206,0.000121276986,0.016152265,0.000078514444,0.00023498747,0.19386728,0.75381,0.03533699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013655526,0.0000051998345,0.00023513364,0.00009210232,0.0000010184662,0.000092659735,0.0025952947,0.000034139306,0.00009172732,0.0076034768,0.98924154,0.0000063396237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035020474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1057816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035020474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077985544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061844904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069633245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1733047441","doi":"10.7748/nr2008.10.16.1.93.c6756","title":"‘Personal pride in developing the profession’","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nurse Researcher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Nursing; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.2619045280120819,"score_gpt":0.5194327834254208,"score_spread":0.25752825541333885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1733047441","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01717548,0.016258009,0.0031124072,0.76206124,0.008087807,0.000037228227,0.0000110933115,0.000099987985,0.19315661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54286647,0.018711893,0.004771369,0.31557533,0.0038237663,0.00012476041,0.00002565821,0.00022799535,0.11387272],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805526,0.01259089,0.00028439704,0.0006244965,0.0033491426,0.0025984752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98323536,0.0053362576,0.0011271078,0.00086169655,0.0017302645,0.007709307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014978296,0.00045191785,0.00046103465,0.0010645975,0.013546478,0.008406174,0.001175359,0.006693263,0.0071315197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01945953,0.0004929648,0.0005714189,0.0007454651,0.036672905,0.009298967,0.009201485,0.017009977,0.0025267499],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051577714,0.00015185491,0.0032823614,0.00028742687,0.000043028922,0.0013172915,0.21653032,0.0001676204,0.00078097463,0.2565046,0.451559,0.06932392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017198332,0.00008484697,0.0032628982,0.00057490024,0.000005742547,0.0020927284,0.07842929,0.00010676248,0.00030113268,0.049149413,0.8659259,0.000049298134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005138251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010899058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014978296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036453216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006531485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07921374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1739854090","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1195","title":"Pushing the Boundaries of Clinical Law: Exploring How Student and Community Legal Clinics Engage with International Human Rights Practice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Compliance (psychology); Political science; International human rights law; Law; International law; Government (linguistics); International community; Legal research; Public relations; Psychology","score_opus":0.2086279458538344,"score_gpt":0.5176745390674697,"score_spread":0.30904659321363537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1739854090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79562557,0.0016976539,0.008241059,0.12012905,0.0008593738,0.0005125327,0.00006568302,0.0001918358,0.072677284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726848,0.0008507743,0.0031182072,0.014313091,0.0001681886,0.00032259812,0.000037509846,0.000108109205,0.008396877],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9173817,0.06897714,0.00076873845,0.0023159252,0.0031960164,0.0073605143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8922678,0.06949786,0.005696811,0.003058011,0.00414206,0.02533753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03621566,0.00075236853,0.0008409691,0.002797171,0.044101227,0.030024651,0.007217499,0.011311152,0.018322239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08757508,0.0015083431,0.0008000714,0.001922246,0.042996462,0.021543248,0.031510014,0.01983532,0.0022892142],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027016913,0.000354995,0.002850885,0.000071166505,0.000008619655,0.0007606606,0.9723489,0.00004529507,0.00018478157,0.0066321455,0.0050735157,0.011641893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017664019,0.000073789844,0.0007602872,0.00017647022,0.0000051580782,0.00033510302,0.97390723,0.00015624885,0.0000791057,0.0038261353,0.020638254,0.000024578852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009187871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028636942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044101227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010643213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029015178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19152904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1740798251","doi":"","title":"Lawyers Gone Bad: Money Sex and Madness in Canada's Legal Profession (Philip Slayton)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03728442380868719,"score_gpt":0.35877167323164394,"score_spread":0.32148724942295676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1740798251","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002113284,0.19577892,0.000089691785,0.7789884,0.007822087,0.000023520815,0.00005909153,0.000015393614,0.015109593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06400502,0.2440947,0.00041959138,0.59767896,0.0106596965,0.000080188445,0.00008144797,0.000081411774,0.08289901],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962042,0.0007000016,0.00012397225,0.00034103723,0.0016614995,0.000969255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99147207,0.002790421,0.00034771787,0.00008644637,0.0028721178,0.0024312986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00367272,0.00059438957,0.00085525785,0.002617753,0.028222771,0.012395366,0.0024618534,0.016910814,0.008603321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012718852,0.00064661755,0.00051266333,0.004193597,0.013612907,0.00528187,0.003448204,0.017904276,0.0008959131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009181396,0.000029513407,0.00083153247,0.00024644626,0.000007710525,0.00015854191,0.005542263,0.000056960846,0.000040105635,0.01715408,0.94108653,0.034837246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029658482,0.000020135585,0.010443371,0.002713911,0.000043774035,0.00033557997,0.026979001,0.00009356673,0.00007807167,0.009345571,0.9498403,0.000077005905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9608736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99030614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050275426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050275426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20641488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36477548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1741390103","doi":"","title":"Detecting Doctrines: The Case Method and the Detective Story","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Analogy; CLARITY; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Doctrine; Consistency (knowledge bases); Legal writing; Memorization; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Constructive; Legal doctrine; Law; Sociology; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10030104389226185,"score_gpt":0.41317236159242365,"score_spread":0.3128713177001618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1741390103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057770334,0.010374499,0.35379168,0.11504418,0.0033168201,0.0009501925,0.00038970466,0.00034528718,0.4580173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7563718,0.0040650973,0.17399253,0.008261874,0.0012136365,0.0018930241,0.00022859535,0.00027298217,0.05370037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754741,0.020104634,0.0005608125,0.0012281521,0.0019532358,0.000679024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95654285,0.036742277,0.0011739595,0.0032318572,0.0013980982,0.0009109624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022896413,0.0008141758,0.00070188806,0.004654898,0.009251315,0.012429929,0.0053158547,0.006861562,0.00962124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043425847,0.0008167314,0.00087822904,0.0029220271,0.035664722,0.020936739,0.008132386,0.007290768,0.0014716239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016955855,0.000029810404,0.0004942637,0.000082819,0.000005467978,0.00078183226,0.026607763,0.00007219532,0.00015082296,0.9546111,0.0069914167,0.0101555325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052841944,0.000063303516,0.00079248636,0.00081461837,0.000030124374,0.004279551,0.05965358,0.0025812872,0.0014041725,0.5840855,0.3461867,0.00005585796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005542543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0087747695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022896413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007943628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043028696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12108922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174246518","doi":"10.29173/alr341","title":"Professional Competence Peer Review and Quality Assurance in England and Wales and in Scotland","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Quality assurance; Peer review; New england; Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Public relations; Law; Psychology; Medicine; Geography; Computer science; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09670666897402098,"score_gpt":0.4308875301133895,"score_spread":0.3341808611393685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174246518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81223,0.027961267,0.0016299485,0.07494433,0.0022118094,0.0007611395,0.00024957742,0.00018584752,0.079826154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743138,0.0039337873,0.0011750095,0.0029539426,0.00029068248,0.00012628193,0.00008441959,0.00002987583,0.017092276],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94940335,0.01685973,0.0036048412,0.0018599398,0.021362288,0.0069098817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8758799,0.028170727,0.016466757,0.0033197408,0.051240023,0.024922859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022538006,0.00023011693,0.0005997599,0.0038802573,0.005816887,0.006718485,0.0015711376,0.0023635097,0.0027210228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08954867,0.00054006075,0.00026753359,0.004072398,0.004465729,0.0019452911,0.005397121,0.0015226927,0.00033356965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074523134,0.00061692955,0.14045225,0.0036376824,0.0001251653,0.008517183,0.18740198,0.0008630371,0.004279326,0.06630044,0.08482586,0.5022349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001921739,0.0009012978,0.55167717,0.0014835143,0.00006150231,0.003384736,0.0968788,0.0006984058,0.0011888114,0.0030698106,0.34021232,0.00025142345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44712502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54369175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44712502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0288671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077297054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88904494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174795138","doi":"10.29173/alr337","title":"Racism and Legal Culture: Is there Room for Diversity in the Legal Profession?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Legal culture; Racism; Legal profession; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07761822857644092,"score_gpt":0.3979800009522478,"score_spread":0.3203617723758069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174795138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048954342,0.040172633,0.0007221613,0.91208005,0.0064546075,0.00001857376,0.000032894928,0.000013148982,0.035610426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28021196,0.095218465,0.0020740035,0.5516491,0.037278805,0.00016544852,0.0000839631,0.00006605579,0.03325217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98979366,0.0031823888,0.00038551402,0.0005764793,0.004899894,0.0011621875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94794005,0.03561418,0.0038959512,0.00083210773,0.00940798,0.002309717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075469804,0.00030449047,0.00093441526,0.0022948158,0.006606265,0.011323908,0.0027027528,0.01422458,0.0044368226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026907679,0.00028391936,0.0008441053,0.0025906898,0.019873412,0.00831734,0.002705676,0.014573447,0.0005910401],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029995146,0.00006758022,0.0030053875,0.0011348602,0.000051477567,0.00041101876,0.015805287,0.00018244491,0.0001818003,0.5401332,0.39132732,0.04766965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003065226,0.0000944285,0.020326898,0.003710679,0.0001279976,0.0005217675,0.04281389,0.00062595855,0.000669056,0.16204137,0.7689,0.000137433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05309302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13606574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.946907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008637234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013088217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10556793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1749298535","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316337875","title":"Fighting Fair: Legal Ethics for an Adversarial Age","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Legal ethics; Cognitive reframing; Law; Legal profession; Honor; Political science; Settlement (finance); Legal realism; Analogy; Economic Justice; Ethical dilemma; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2869393197559734,"score_gpt":0.4873242243172676,"score_spread":0.20038490456129415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1749298535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006522456,0.018290775,0.02665539,0.24658167,0.003077019,0.000062555235,0.000024780498,0.000084754836,0.6987006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5338442,0.009978224,0.014456605,0.069983415,0.0027277556,0.00027942102,0.000033771033,0.00021497611,0.36848164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943973,0.0034915546,0.00009680955,0.0003394396,0.0012143443,0.00046055258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962089,0.0025202471,0.00022032576,0.0002791023,0.00034707919,0.0004242828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007615744,0.00068491965,0.00033871114,0.0009091582,0.009480356,0.012259601,0.0012037543,0.008161469,0.0042825355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008396572,0.00024955426,0.00030596496,0.0005191918,0.0546175,0.014100304,0.0051075104,0.011369714,0.0014427725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011822378,0.0000048759575,0.000024093777,0.0000073227784,8.829702e-7,0.000028594664,0.0028978537,0.000055875385,0.000022038119,0.9814362,0.012532256,0.0029888407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030476676,0.000007231893,0.000066716566,0.000095443655,0.0000013983371,0.00008138682,0.0030432953,0.0002496005,0.000071157854,0.8018154,0.19455676,0.000008545863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037271865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006023442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012259601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005889851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006152578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042734027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1761713647","doi":"","title":"Custody, Control, and Confusion: Legal, Historical, and Territorial Aspects of Court Records in Ontario","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archivaria","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Locale (computer software); Legislation; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Confusion; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Humanities; Ethnology; History; Archaeology; Art","score_opus":0.019600650225916994,"score_gpt":0.3040535594768348,"score_spread":0.2844529092509178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1761713647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8753513,0.0031268436,0.00055956555,0.009790402,0.000082039405,0.000091215115,0.0009612385,0.000023962397,0.11001346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98327386,0.0013598467,0.00017337456,0.00022036566,0.000028962113,0.000032688647,0.00015895201,0.000011849334,0.014740141],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960836,0.0004592343,0.0003195691,0.00028669494,0.0017242215,0.0011266461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98387593,0.005635388,0.004196921,0.00069681293,0.0042206505,0.0013742348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025896686,0.0001594185,0.00031254042,0.0040363558,0.018076507,0.007814266,0.0013549641,0.0009600789,0.005593303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020290812,0.00040344827,0.00017936662,0.013369551,0.010728566,0.0029798313,0.0038799127,0.0009747402,0.00019564913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012357021,0.000032281576,0.13948487,0.00032816167,0.000025189223,0.0018150163,0.7091448,0.00043529453,0.0007423708,0.09329757,0.011330787,0.043240152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000121550465,0.000031009917,0.443524,0.00037926936,0.000044640397,0.00037490667,0.3940429,0.0003699238,0.0003389945,0.0038697666,0.15692104,0.00009131252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9847835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99493355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11634745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11634745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086389996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8441638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W176249346","doi":"","title":"Enhancing Access to Justice in Nigeria with Judicial Case Management: An Evolving Norm in Common Law Countries","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summons; Economic Justice; Obligation; Law; Civil procedure; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.01843144701148711,"score_gpt":0.37411300223831656,"score_spread":0.3556815552268294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W176249346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40815187,0.106422134,0.008956565,0.24206807,0.002777047,0.000632504,0.00013912116,0.0001138631,0.23073885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9237688,0.03699572,0.011346317,0.01029351,0.0005679541,0.00013847639,0.000073491676,0.000033027976,0.016782545],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572456,0.0014650878,0.0004064518,0.00042561692,0.0010196674,0.00095862633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860513,0.005821915,0.0025442769,0.00071720843,0.0018530162,0.0030122763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006947627,0.00021275424,0.00034200298,0.0016511551,0.0041661575,0.011854539,0.0017766132,0.0028659306,0.0063934075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0134134935,0.00027208353,0.00023609372,0.0021123206,0.007298728,0.0043675774,0.0037610503,0.002439704,0.00037446205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006600473,0.0007475273,0.050814867,0.0026911139,0.00002304779,0.004292756,0.022805776,0.0009645942,0.0020982532,0.32694793,0.031776413,0.5567717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004510867,0.0003330493,0.10807864,0.010973223,0.000032117143,0.0034930827,0.07015047,0.0018923221,0.0015180588,0.10207329,0.70124424,0.00016637584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012173105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027160386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012173105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005773753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024404071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041891694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W176882265","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Technology on Courts and Judicial Ethics: An Overview","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Competence (human resources); Political science; Judicial independence; Transparency (behavior); Law; Diligence; Public relations; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08767505871447571,"score_gpt":0.45845316312417755,"score_spread":0.3707781044097018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W176882265","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018975642,0.89741087,0.0035761292,0.010966319,0.0010932428,0.000024908742,0.00003734655,0.000022146183,0.084971525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030589834,0.951181,0.002227203,0.0049319584,0.0053084367,0.00006379121,0.00004878999,0.000026884558,0.005621976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505687,0.0026109973,0.00036432457,0.00025778858,0.0012759288,0.00043419845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932115,0.005614075,0.00026503525,0.00013024104,0.0005856938,0.00019341614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025705928,0.00078010134,0.00094765425,0.008495817,0.0030176148,0.010200486,0.0010199414,0.0065690307,0.0041254023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004060348,0.0006544842,0.00087538303,0.00785117,0.008379324,0.014946931,0.0034777748,0.0055975374,0.001513581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027157565,0.000103251805,0.0012786213,0.0026426548,0.000045530007,0.00044021907,0.003156799,0.0011228692,0.00029932568,0.8098912,0.037806448,0.14318585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007948977,0.00009405646,0.0029373465,0.0062631452,0.000029428938,0.00091746304,0.0017402414,0.0008091246,0.0001649389,0.17049997,0.8164882,0.000048131555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005537966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005373638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010200486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005380902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003911822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03904134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1771400877","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139043281","title":"Aristotle: Eudemian Ethics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Happiness; Philosophy; Virtue ethics; Normative ethics; Meta-ethics; Epistemology; Ethical theories; Virtue; Moral philosophy; Information ethics; Engineering ethics; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.09896071264446027,"score_gpt":0.3358034430189233,"score_spread":0.23684273037446302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1771400877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001769958,0.0566694,0.0042747473,0.009430459,0.0010565396,0.00001771765,0.000042594867,0.000048656744,0.92668986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2072398,0.036434583,0.0075862505,0.008731263,0.00171595,0.00013663006,0.00012985997,0.00011180173,0.7379137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990584,0.00038126757,0.000023749908,0.00008949848,0.0003665102,0.00008066952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979347,0.00008990818,0.000013113596,0.000020529644,0.00006342932,0.000019619996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073937775,0.00065428053,0.0003580425,0.0011027819,0.0034870664,0.0036947534,0.0005031212,0.0022290025,0.005815572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011080523,0.00020909651,0.00018806028,0.0013659206,0.007542228,0.0033688678,0.001295723,0.002735602,0.0023462188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054000943,0.000005963705,0.000025098514,0.000044469703,0.0000010967253,0.000034031553,0.0017119537,0.00010176091,0.000042823765,0.9492356,0.03465949,0.014132241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003981062,0.0000069047314,0.0001803333,0.00018065296,0.0000015987451,0.00006014869,0.0006992022,0.00015758468,0.00006515941,0.4158729,0.58276665,0.0000048589886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006338267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010399742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006338267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050683976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028879617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03677392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1777088795","doi":"","title":"Trends in Global and Canadian Lawyer Regulation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Globalization; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Order (exchange); Law; Sociology; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.014056789400844056,"score_gpt":0.32878871852553215,"score_spread":0.3147319291246881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1777088795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11044602,0.027903404,0.0016604299,0.27380574,0.0015734156,0.00012700773,0.00250084,0.00029237435,0.5816908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77572924,0.026587084,0.0037414203,0.07921637,0.00048439996,0.00008705942,0.001730752,0.00021104245,0.11221263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807678,0.00096250576,0.00043158716,0.0026056,0.009461748,0.0057708253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804559,0.0019999626,0.0013754609,0.00058135437,0.011282103,0.0043052672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063580973,0.00050320296,0.0004806288,0.0067734746,0.017379785,0.015159534,0.0024805923,0.004147187,0.019300977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012771325,0.0004613463,0.00082212774,0.012380746,0.0127718495,0.0043049417,0.004969561,0.0064172363,0.0009396318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074714815,0.00007770978,0.031009555,0.00059433613,0.000086955166,0.0006178109,0.033070132,0.00069383887,0.0008721691,0.6268286,0.19316454,0.11290962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017304452,0.000028407308,0.07144073,0.0005491867,0.000060483086,0.00022759801,0.02055872,0.00035811865,0.0004722183,0.009147981,0.89698297,0.00015613729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98689073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23277517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23277517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24977091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8898721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1777531247","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1026","title":"The Role of PLEI in Poverty Law Services","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019771404257513458,"score_gpt":0.3744577847136049,"score_spread":0.35468638045609147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1777531247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22956933,0.0031433087,0.0042523122,0.4216036,0.0006010454,0.0001939585,0.0001222559,0.00009852933,0.3404157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708681,0.0007414475,0.00072183844,0.015152939,0.00024265115,0.000106142696,0.000016347623,0.00003800429,0.012112506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96536446,0.021051567,0.00053689274,0.0010242119,0.0029954459,0.009027417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9059742,0.05110651,0.005030624,0.0021334395,0.00545282,0.030302323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024768207,0.00022544169,0.0004935403,0.0028431383,0.018985761,0.016840523,0.0028389615,0.008305361,0.032888554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07920118,0.00066916744,0.00053098757,0.002440405,0.021819763,0.011328682,0.018091587,0.009213649,0.0012112758],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012875306,0.00087996735,0.03184325,0.00017337831,0.00002913811,0.00050615054,0.03730578,0.00075156806,0.00017124403,0.785051,0.035259202,0.107900575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022724087,0.00050407014,0.06532869,0.0021755828,0.00008632691,0.0008329612,0.08577388,0.0042688544,0.0005878913,0.54925716,0.29083037,0.00012699184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05435279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07797836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05435279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023627091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07483647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17142731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1778197116","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2729","title":"The Ethical Obligations of Defence Counsel in Sexual Assault Cases","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Law; Value (mathematics); Position (finance); Closing (real estate); Criminology; Stereotype (UML); Legal ethics; Cross-examination; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Business","score_opus":0.052636546576277275,"score_gpt":0.39205267656244996,"score_spread":0.3394161299861727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1778197116","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24886298,0.009046493,0.009535438,0.58802027,0.0008703301,0.00012197814,0.000022765784,0.00006250172,0.14345728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9543001,0.0018045031,0.0034000615,0.0324277,0.00034261696,0.00008108019,0.0000065041204,0.000015209749,0.007622156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9416785,0.044075146,0.0019282574,0.0013695897,0.006587085,0.004361377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9297447,0.05262564,0.0037813748,0.0025487153,0.004377589,0.0069219708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035978146,0.00026276815,0.00041068075,0.0013373417,0.014856048,0.009355161,0.0016917444,0.019563086,0.0022717803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09738172,0.00055296544,0.00029431947,0.00078853033,0.029168265,0.0038899896,0.009495727,0.011772239,0.0007173072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008233619,0.0001741404,0.009727804,0.00014140054,0.000027229125,0.0061711143,0.21060444,0.0006119293,0.0016442013,0.69290084,0.023596413,0.054318115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008929224,0.00014044266,0.004961752,0.0015007447,0.000029617138,0.008543768,0.17635687,0.0014010035,0.0016180513,0.56408536,0.24112995,0.0001431535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006056956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010452644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035978146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056309537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021512838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19027293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1778949312","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv18pgtvp","title":"Propriété intellectuelle et université","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Diamond V; Université Laval","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.02877877099040622,"score_gpt":0.2517112519296599,"score_spread":0.22293248093925366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1778949312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034805886,0.011835371,0.0036126217,0.042242896,0.00053241313,0.000024714016,0.00026258265,0.000093941206,0.9065897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7950025,0.0072193104,0.0017008749,0.0049456707,0.0005369171,0.00005365002,0.00012486965,0.000079233054,0.19033697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954656,0.0014057456,0.00013273206,0.0004609344,0.0013268074,0.0012081618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960896,0.0011213489,0.00043796806,0.00033806948,0.0010862952,0.00092680706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028242897,0.00049070275,0.00052970235,0.002815827,0.011342577,0.015425103,0.0011493701,0.0028800606,0.02346982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005280643,0.0002638791,0.00033032117,0.0032357,0.022890119,0.0066725365,0.004965691,0.0047826404,0.0025610207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013889754,0.000009013101,0.0011845703,0.00005942263,0.000005094967,0.00007832738,0.008438308,0.00008259887,0.00008382268,0.9687818,0.009636272,0.0116268275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013482045,0.000028479797,0.021147814,0.00064422865,0.000016656297,0.00025150727,0.014955784,0.00047737986,0.0003643012,0.13508427,0.82693636,0.00007979856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37500212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50289404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37500212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03595676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023939205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7456387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1779249908","doi":"10.3968/5846","title":"Problems Existing in Supervision on Administrative Enforcement of Law and Countermeasur","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Irrationality; Administration (probate law); Independence (probability theory); Business; Enforcement; Transparency (behavior); Law; Political science; Rationality","score_opus":0.315151060697013,"score_gpt":0.5196730794185446,"score_spread":0.20452201872153158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1779249908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34141842,0.017185843,0.030302208,0.21698853,0.0016531342,0.000425418,0.00016082537,0.00031170703,0.3915539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820201,0.001995928,0.0029648182,0.0033809051,0.00041941347,0.000112121954,0.0000214303,0.00002824007,0.009057009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9615881,0.017722942,0.002706324,0.004174504,0.010547666,0.0032604623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94599545,0.027220394,0.007748709,0.0069007035,0.009105408,0.003029296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02909811,0.00027979212,0.0005919633,0.0028505507,0.0068676244,0.007591393,0.0027042262,0.0025454839,0.0065465113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058833774,0.0004921563,0.00044440496,0.0027030471,0.029097289,0.007455758,0.00513956,0.0039000763,0.00041408336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052366686,0.00010893026,0.018448837,0.00029118825,0.000022144184,0.00032667906,0.026629882,0.00061503175,0.00023794461,0.84097123,0.013314925,0.09898075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012528348,0.00020240188,0.0653001,0.00212393,0.00006026665,0.0008046777,0.053352185,0.0061956453,0.0016369752,0.52873266,0.34129763,0.00016826947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02229215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02084326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02909811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010299445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028350474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15388733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W178615311","doi":"","title":"A Quarter of a Century of Feminism in Law: Back to the Future?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; Feminist legal theory; Reproductive justice; Legislature; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Sexual assault; Economic Justice; Domestic violence; Law reform; Sociology; Gender studies; Criminology; Abortion; Poison control; History; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.01630730957435702,"score_gpt":0.31906487152308244,"score_spread":0.30275756194872544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W178615311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004192965,0.09435402,0.0012361163,0.8254223,0.010927359,0.000006319163,0.000034568366,0.0000400197,0.0637863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37452203,0.16934125,0.002739988,0.27349782,0.032466207,0.000085792715,0.00008915886,0.00038169647,0.14687608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995379,0.0028088484,0.000076606666,0.0003642455,0.0007349069,0.0006364118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932086,0.0041140364,0.0002804305,0.00047969256,0.0009579288,0.0009592246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060630683,0.0004795831,0.00066169555,0.0011257741,0.008698518,0.012362358,0.0009027412,0.005286687,0.018851677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008878678,0.00028847717,0.00035897727,0.0013696965,0.034553163,0.019030921,0.0040110075,0.009199734,0.002759729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054308653,0.000055169676,0.0007477823,0.00027855675,0.000009376729,0.00018044969,0.03589234,0.00010012523,0.00020033518,0.6553087,0.19005789,0.11711503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040686114,0.000015584685,0.00040198822,0.0005804338,0.0000022727513,0.00010265726,0.021932727,0.000047316804,0.00008690741,0.08822445,0.8885874,0.000014259653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012528144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017816609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018851677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072485786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066054855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06306511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1795517192","doi":"","title":"Uphold professional values","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lund University Publications (Lund University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Family Medicine","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.028106727035747396,"score_gpt":0.28872019070120525,"score_spread":0.26061346366545785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1795517192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023239166,0.00066858344,0.0049076867,0.036238592,0.0007769333,0.000044117627,0.000025123853,0.00006338825,0.9340363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76459527,0.00044836427,0.00216085,0.011555242,0.00051794015,0.000090019865,0.000041401297,0.0001149193,0.22047594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813983,0.006229416,0.0004177813,0.0016157835,0.0072502987,0.0030883567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742458,0.009316189,0.0014306144,0.004904422,0.004743539,0.0053594396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01155309,0.00045246506,0.00064382516,0.002056521,0.01253199,0.018430553,0.0014295719,0.007264638,0.02530115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033436958,0.00046003217,0.00046416148,0.001168183,0.035414897,0.009226851,0.014687553,0.010122066,0.0076697897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012782208,0.00004443086,0.00048466166,0.000020307814,0.0000062128784,0.00009762571,0.013921073,0.000039671722,0.0001688817,0.95310956,0.014455664,0.017639123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002286392,0.000035566532,0.0009167849,0.00016250215,0.00001257731,0.00015940666,0.010950339,0.0001705752,0.00047954917,0.665277,0.32179236,0.00002056424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030212293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064446055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02530115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006982428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015628347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0846408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1806223527","doi":"","title":"Law Student Plagiarism: Contemporary Challenges and Responses","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal education; Law; Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology","score_opus":0.11740130473833077,"score_gpt":0.4077121056431218,"score_spread":0.29031080090479106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1806223527","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091470174,0.016402286,0.0017818469,0.8342804,0.0020367228,0.000102505925,0.00016832523,0.0002011675,0.05355666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8111688,0.026698004,0.002018144,0.1349117,0.004609526,0.00022979635,0.00025807566,0.00020228948,0.019903712],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9681285,0.01541356,0.0020712372,0.0027100828,0.008510861,0.0031657228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8840933,0.07039259,0.011935827,0.0029277003,0.01710352,0.013546937],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028318409,0.00038496125,0.00068244955,0.003544561,0.0113546625,0.015520251,0.0030938848,0.01226433,0.015635714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0993906,0.00043888486,0.00056154217,0.004257851,0.008395398,0.011315039,0.011388988,0.011272226,0.0027196608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021922373,0.00051436975,0.044664934,0.0024771504,0.00008175638,0.003327988,0.26793072,0.0005493537,0.0014700418,0.07346225,0.23476885,0.37053335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038280043,0.00019460754,0.025929937,0.002975362,0.00003307123,0.0021245044,0.51717687,0.0006340309,0.0005622165,0.030664768,0.41950503,0.00016140571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041795834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008912984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073741977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009711851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14976382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1808059804","doi":"","title":"Equipping the Garage Guys in Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maryland law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nature versus nurture; Legal education; Law; Curriculum; Globalization; Legal profession; Value (mathematics); Political science; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.14886619420749825,"score_gpt":0.3971725673052461,"score_spread":0.24830637309774783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1808059804","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013360782,0.025617093,0.008479645,0.49145085,0.0031205877,0.00011364746,0.000041607018,0.00031063546,0.45750517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46843383,0.017742176,0.0082398,0.27427498,0.0018596853,0.00026666367,0.00006701875,0.0002322298,0.22888365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911034,0.005830828,0.00014392892,0.00055086263,0.0013427535,0.001028256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922829,0.0041104765,0.0004070916,0.0005817732,0.0010197369,0.0015979664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074508083,0.0004102636,0.0003018294,0.0011959659,0.012415748,0.007097702,0.0010683342,0.00749638,0.021661814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016426574,0.00039680814,0.00030414754,0.0006155291,0.014945814,0.011105584,0.0065776682,0.0109472005,0.0042338385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019381132,0.000083084946,0.0013328703,0.00016377575,0.000008348808,0.00048667245,0.016713357,0.0001347229,0.0003698146,0.49852854,0.40267116,0.07948833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066596945,0.00004014805,0.000676779,0.00036345707,0.0000047960343,0.00026466575,0.008160789,0.00009594557,0.00019784266,0.030596808,0.9595786,0.00001357029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013462581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029495407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021661814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038957756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009245164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072466016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1813242488","doi":"","title":"The Language of Supreme Court Briefs: A Large-Scale Quantitative Investigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Skepticism; Political science; Scope (computer science); Majority opinion; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.025344717686607638,"score_gpt":0.3886354509415238,"score_spread":0.3632907332549162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1813242488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98679465,0.00088678376,0.0025857443,0.0011168892,0.00005005793,0.00081410544,0.0015202792,0.000026479647,0.0062048486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98885345,0.0010198494,0.0036237543,0.00061403133,0.00007846127,0.0028046381,0.0014773259,0.000038734317,0.0014898062],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96730477,0.02059893,0.0037514393,0.0016902565,0.005849261,0.0008053821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77584255,0.16299891,0.034410648,0.0051287683,0.018497078,0.0031220845],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028111517,0.00026416153,0.0004939095,0.008646303,0.0038181196,0.0057650907,0.001429145,0.0011107827,0.0037198456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14019948,0.00055035425,0.00032871615,0.011995098,0.004559476,0.0068248794,0.0034533779,0.0015452227,0.0005799474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029906834,0.0007696945,0.21506546,0.003676261,0.00009225545,0.0009291339,0.67424136,0.00027341102,0.0036193521,0.011128971,0.009229815,0.080675185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002744084,0.0004511401,0.23701839,0.0015215355,0.000036834103,0.00035924558,0.71214706,0.0006094296,0.000845158,0.0018005294,0.045080844,0.00010235452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054908935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008265975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004777394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003059195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14866972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814677584","doi":"10.18352/ijca.125","title":"The Development and Role of the Court Administrator in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Court Administration","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Christian ministry; Administration of justice; Political science; Law; Public administration; Work (physics); Corporate governance; Public relations; Sociology; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.03635268948329878,"score_gpt":0.35724334599905183,"score_spread":0.32089065651575305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814677584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39103425,0.0071504465,0.0022307925,0.2257301,0.0033442872,0.00046253056,0.0003445756,0.00027870576,0.36942428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8696554,0.002810303,0.0015179319,0.010688407,0.00014608957,0.000064563654,0.000119002296,0.00012457365,0.11487372],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97907835,0.004181388,0.00046516632,0.0017138572,0.006499106,0.008062297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9237029,0.005247918,0.0016027715,0.00054750155,0.022525074,0.046373818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010023299,0.00039408184,0.0005687878,0.0033486185,0.0573315,0.02221063,0.0041872654,0.005219443,0.013347762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034624614,0.0007608979,0.000379065,0.0043880744,0.012555824,0.004099024,0.007938681,0.0071469937,0.0012320676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022656942,0.0004622521,0.06516197,0.00029046708,0.000057241105,0.005301158,0.26900882,0.00096421706,0.00197977,0.22097984,0.27468282,0.1608849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034343844,0.00014203829,0.048240557,0.0004701019,0.000066001114,0.00044384497,0.23117015,0.0014306451,0.0008592936,0.0052722497,0.7116707,0.0002001209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25365156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25365156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.53463006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8656584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1820456544","doi":"","title":"Legislation Assessment Lesson Is the Construction Direction of Freshmen Seminar for Law Major in China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Legislation; Curriculum; Diversity (politics); Humanism; Law; Expression (computer science); Class (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Legal writing; Mathematics education; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Legal research; Engineering; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022377182205602815,"score_gpt":0.36969585663232074,"score_spread":0.34731867442671793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1820456544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29032883,0.0009934735,0.016246248,0.09331327,0.011231573,0.004727059,0.0040407004,0.0048768613,0.57424194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3757276,0.00069335336,0.028370801,0.008649516,0.00087177206,0.0018647237,0.0032982156,0.0002873445,0.5802367],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958247,0.00004529307,0.000017767612,0.000073502975,0.0001384161,0.0001425644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986811,0.000032587584,0.00003595282,0.000036089612,0.00032764103,0.00088659575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008527044,0.00048191927,0.0002844298,0.0007161061,0.0045808232,0.0010217057,0.0011740878,0.0013068352,0.07337349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012729167,0.0002517699,0.00043665207,0.0004582637,0.00064398657,0.0012375149,0.0012927805,0.001995157,0.008692764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016568205,0.0016636899,0.013408215,0.00028836908,0.000010206552,0.0006622708,0.0066521512,0.00026965456,0.009541835,0.012985671,0.72659653,0.22775565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010892039,0.00051551155,0.067513674,0.00018277508,0.000020823318,0.0002058167,0.009820643,0.0007557607,0.00577708,0.005054062,0.90996,0.000084971885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023381276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07941763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07337349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037430942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012273461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24545878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1821066401","doi":"","title":"The Preclusion of Nonlawyer Ownership of Law Firms: Protecting the Interest of Clients or Protecting the Interest of Lawyers?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Practice of law; Commission; Law; Legal ethics; Professional conduct; Legal profession; Business; Legal service; Commercial law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.07780946816225806,"score_gpt":0.3734540263227241,"score_spread":0.2956445581604661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1821066401","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11067615,0.017588308,0.012026752,0.7368031,0.0014711374,0.0001316542,0.00008286919,0.000057535595,0.12116252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8186898,0.005768769,0.0042512454,0.15785281,0.0017944428,0.00018964872,0.00005842291,0.00007767188,0.011317075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9598202,0.01641725,0.0019481136,0.004646666,0.011695394,0.005472312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9224295,0.04730333,0.009709778,0.007783978,0.007563264,0.0052100937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03192649,0.0003933781,0.000986401,0.0010542586,0.00760184,0.020138143,0.0044665774,0.020111354,0.005288438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08789639,0.0007715564,0.00093106675,0.0010762105,0.0512142,0.028853955,0.011458168,0.02288,0.0011383498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008625791,0.0001751262,0.0067813047,0.00032645918,0.000032257503,0.0006716136,0.024164677,0.00013278543,0.00087140757,0.89517164,0.02046484,0.05112153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015874028,0.0003155863,0.014218623,0.0056254547,0.00015280192,0.0017431856,0.054354317,0.0008337901,0.0033551343,0.56509125,0.35395402,0.00019711432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014867245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016846359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03192649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006473072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024286343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16884547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1822131644","doi":"","title":"Electronic Records and the Law of Evidence in Canada: The Uniform Electronic Evidence Act Twelve Years Later","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Electronic records; Relevance (law); Confusion; Enforcement; Law; Rules of evidence; Empirical evidence; Law enforcement; Political science; Business; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03647071615937462,"score_gpt":0.33617169479253667,"score_spread":0.29970097863316203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1822131644","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054072376,0.03484676,0.014708005,0.63993275,0.0073060584,0.00043765293,0.0015963569,0.00019269103,0.24690741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.624574,0.021118576,0.022118088,0.15057047,0.002216579,0.00029073053,0.000875261,0.0001761002,0.17806016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9333161,0.007755331,0.0048069023,0.0037104094,0.041489303,0.008922017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8409594,0.060354672,0.006224844,0.0066348705,0.07647711,0.00934905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038534414,0.0004223587,0.0008030292,0.004802744,0.014588883,0.023121763,0.004181942,0.015323304,0.0042276513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15138009,0.0011312875,0.0010871311,0.0061068977,0.020438453,0.011960099,0.007374669,0.016528301,0.00071213476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055521232,0.00007752624,0.004596229,0.00011788039,0.000019330795,0.00033309247,0.006868421,0.00077664433,0.00017647489,0.9009874,0.051305924,0.034685608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008912447,0.00011235327,0.026096363,0.0018187645,0.0001122192,0.00029816528,0.0074576265,0.0032461733,0.000806224,0.09433829,0.86525303,0.0003716473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96335495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95793784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13047011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13047011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35764036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9466314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1827276926","doi":"10.3968/5607","title":"Discussion on Beyond of Marx's Philosophy of Law From the Perspective of the Nature of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Law; Dialectic; Rationality; Philosophy; Aside; Unification; Philosophy of law; Materialism; Universal law; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Comparative law; Political science","score_opus":0.024814447563342515,"score_gpt":0.3772037284739288,"score_spread":0.3523892809105863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1827276926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014426692,0.023863176,0.028381115,0.38492587,0.00213883,0.000043375854,0.00012753457,0.00006922728,0.5460242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85562724,0.018563101,0.010126327,0.045887213,0.003742126,0.00019431952,0.00008133264,0.00011621699,0.06566217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952371,0.0023126684,0.00012645086,0.00043994992,0.0013730975,0.0005106274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967625,0.0024202701,0.00020484248,0.0001525204,0.0003336649,0.00012611678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004925784,0.00045947146,0.0005370846,0.0017193714,0.005790147,0.0063819946,0.0014246873,0.0046428703,0.005193259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058113937,0.00018655242,0.00057130394,0.0016136871,0.026044987,0.011579727,0.0035491432,0.006638131,0.00061161537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001565045,0.000001814717,0.000022606166,0.00001148079,5.5772216e-7,0.000026850477,0.0015055262,0.000027571074,0.000022931588,0.99560153,0.0016090166,0.0011685226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028985094,0.000006041128,0.000113921094,0.000120061144,0.0000017719839,0.000095867064,0.0022040724,0.00018897961,0.00012321578,0.87022585,0.12690946,0.000007937036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050536525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046118065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072157765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072157765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056601013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052354395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1827817526","doi":"","title":"Lawyers Gone Bad: Money Sex and Madness in Canada's Legal Profession (Philip Slayton)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal profession; Political science","score_opus":0.03728442380868719,"score_gpt":0.35877167323164394,"score_spread":0.32148724942295676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1827817526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002113284,0.19577892,0.000089691785,0.7789884,0.007822087,0.000023520815,0.00005909153,0.000015393614,0.015109593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06400502,0.2440947,0.00041959138,0.59767896,0.0106596965,0.000080188445,0.00008144797,0.000081411774,0.08289901],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962042,0.0007000016,0.00012397225,0.00034103723,0.0016614995,0.000969255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99147207,0.002790421,0.00034771787,0.00008644637,0.0028721178,0.0024312986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00367272,0.00059438957,0.00085525785,0.002617753,0.028222771,0.012395366,0.0024618534,0.016910814,0.008603321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012718852,0.00064661755,0.00051266333,0.004193597,0.013612907,0.00528187,0.003448204,0.017904276,0.0008959131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009181396,0.000029513407,0.00083153247,0.00024644626,0.000007710525,0.00015854191,0.005542263,0.000056960846,0.000040105635,0.01715408,0.94108653,0.034837246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029658482,0.000020135585,0.010443371,0.002713911,0.000043774035,0.00033557997,0.026979001,0.00009356673,0.00007807167,0.009345571,0.9498403,0.000077005905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9608736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99030614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050275426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050275426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20641488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36477548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834083885","doi":"","title":"Do Codes of Ethics Actually Shape Legal Practice","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ethical code; Deliberation; Legal ethics; Professional conduct; Ethical dilemma; Political science; Professional responsibility; Dilemma; Engineering ethics; Action (physics); Professional ethics; Legal profession; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.20164652755208584,"score_gpt":0.44091636373665494,"score_spread":0.2392698361845691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834083885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43397003,0.0012724021,0.022555633,0.069396034,0.00036165182,0.00012615637,0.0001004428,0.0001235226,0.4720941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938081,0.00019137486,0.0021126524,0.000875955,0.00003433447,0.000032472148,0.000015405167,0.000041153926,0.0028884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9622732,0.021924784,0.0011005503,0.0024238268,0.008104373,0.00417323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8942345,0.054376807,0.021391628,0.010051803,0.010849272,0.009096002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017043129,0.00025423904,0.00041455,0.0027104858,0.0088440655,0.012278536,0.0013386677,0.004005445,0.0051292297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10058538,0.0005717079,0.0004304621,0.0023140074,0.05742905,0.010388363,0.005951743,0.0033099805,0.0008801265],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046081645,0.000086279906,0.045624357,0.00011250457,0.00003202288,0.00029035474,0.17418076,0.00064085016,0.0004647043,0.73855317,0.0057855975,0.034183297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071942006,0.000058802874,0.04883426,0.00047819712,0.000023514385,0.00030666392,0.117760636,0.0013939056,0.00044279624,0.68016493,0.15037383,0.00009058089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043566104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06878639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043566104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015556071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023440382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11286771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1836597817","doi":"10.3968/5845","title":"Study on the Path to Cultivate Interdisciplinary Talents of Law in Universities of Science and Technology","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Social needs; Path (computing); Mode (computer interface); Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Business; Engineering management; Engineering; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.034695889604914494,"score_gpt":0.41214661288650256,"score_spread":0.3774507232815881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1836597817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9346074,0.00047609743,0.0033965043,0.0072559025,0.00002719683,0.000111770605,0.00003803148,0.00001177785,0.054075263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960044,0.00033227127,0.0012944143,0.00011176036,0.0000042864967,0.000023724095,0.000010945252,0.0000015902581,0.0022165936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988772,0.00050492614,0.00003310455,0.00011426675,0.00015436189,0.00031614155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693394,0.0013476092,0.0003819743,0.00007827351,0.00050755084,0.00075068185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014293969,0.0001313235,0.00012059362,0.0012131417,0.0024797902,0.0034894461,0.00051541405,0.0009072791,0.0053702854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038127983,0.00010580201,0.00022256038,0.0014408454,0.0020792482,0.0030721666,0.001482431,0.001100002,0.00030120419],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015781354,0.00091705594,0.1777268,0.0004188278,0.000029088773,0.0016742059,0.08483426,0.0013547858,0.00334185,0.5960979,0.0023376606,0.13110983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081423765,0.00092080404,0.3252966,0.0009213355,0.000096884556,0.0010983114,0.40634915,0.012110854,0.0055124876,0.16745579,0.080077544,0.000078781464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024802561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004402378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053702854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031133667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008330798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022589207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1836816068","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1026330","title":"Legislative Ethics and Codes of Conduct","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Ethical code; Political science; Legal ethics; Law and economics; Law; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.08425468168519405,"score_gpt":0.4292144516438294,"score_spread":0.3449597699586353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1836816068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022005102,0.0028996714,0.059015185,0.10772765,0.0014401666,0.00034667228,0.00026785664,0.00013553101,0.80616224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8826558,0.001406827,0.025396252,0.018680329,0.0014469271,0.0019533134,0.00021618188,0.00017843385,0.06806592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.84044296,0.10529729,0.008592561,0.0074463226,0.028701562,0.009519352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7902036,0.14358878,0.01331305,0.018445548,0.030477403,0.003971714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06005833,0.0009087291,0.0015631679,0.005949783,0.0134818535,0.025816025,0.0027275924,0.023673583,0.005618694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14295925,0.0018563458,0.00097098853,0.00467614,0.06885237,0.011919401,0.005580399,0.017416451,0.0021823957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002011256,0.000004592515,0.00008045542,0.000006799062,0.0000019283896,0.000009006546,0.0010001736,0.00004656185,0.000012542857,0.99645257,0.0016583088,0.0007250949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013351512,0.000008058241,0.0004173542,0.00019840125,0.000009282377,0.000073611205,0.0013821531,0.00038423363,0.00013516737,0.95572025,0.041627575,0.00003049213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013826501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013147811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06005833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009795802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021805324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3176226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1841882670","doi":"","title":"Judgment Proofing the Profession","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; General partnership; Limited liability partnership; Liability; Legislation; Legal profession; Business; Legislature; Limited partnership; Law; Limited liability; Legal liability; Political science; Public relations","score_opus":0.04434517224874648,"score_gpt":0.3616315726299164,"score_spread":0.31728640038116995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1841882670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005806686,0.008124689,0.04066098,0.15456456,0.010050239,0.00021600106,0.00017219743,0.00026414398,0.7801406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53417826,0.009409964,0.037628826,0.08263581,0.009946583,0.00044659525,0.00025987564,0.0004896183,0.32500446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761463,0.00790893,0.0012386771,0.0042816224,0.0085022515,0.0019221494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9551344,0.022860935,0.001979454,0.006646424,0.010526816,0.0028520084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023817183,0.00077340705,0.00097276125,0.0024565777,0.013714223,0.013669476,0.0028696328,0.0093942275,0.025843099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07445329,0.0006247304,0.0011356663,0.0010548217,0.048345175,0.0149511155,0.0119218165,0.015277397,0.007552229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018624958,0.000012949106,0.00030679457,0.000067466804,0.000008128073,0.00020008638,0.0016052573,0.00015258613,0.00011850158,0.93420315,0.046391167,0.016915238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025431462,0.000028300505,0.00024542562,0.0003270936,0.000013985897,0.0002896626,0.0010613049,0.00036766267,0.0003753775,0.46461925,0.53261596,0.000030579926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0151617965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014633708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025843099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070371735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022682408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1259588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1842772683","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020130906.3012","title":"China’s Law Teaching Methods Reform","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interactivity; Citizen journalism; Democracy; China; Order (exchange); Mathematics education; Teaching method; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Multimedia; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.07518091959226812,"score_gpt":0.5111097227346213,"score_spread":0.43592880314235316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1842772683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59586424,0.013303781,0.036707003,0.06788829,0.0013938576,0.001238666,0.00050810084,0.0008079016,0.28228822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92958206,0.0023106001,0.008058195,0.0019209974,0.00029931645,0.00028733196,0.00021129631,0.000037446986,0.057292774],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968958,0.00086331944,0.00021762824,0.00031152111,0.0012014478,0.0005102516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986237,0.00044796534,0.00012135683,0.00020791854,0.00039126672,0.00020781328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038179434,0.0003455665,0.00025346238,0.0015340231,0.0035818457,0.0023853465,0.0007841845,0.0012296753,0.0049488707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040760217,0.00021916397,0.00041655227,0.0019663798,0.0016898721,0.001449268,0.0017793137,0.0011051581,0.00031986253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101806916,0.0003733953,0.029541869,0.0011297014,0.00006487345,0.0005553838,0.015910607,0.004226238,0.008123299,0.3063785,0.03490748,0.5986868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018079238,0.000385899,0.14597644,0.00045817858,0.0001264849,0.00045177733,0.0038267963,0.02148209,0.010594623,0.037304316,0.7790794,0.0001333279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054724213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059025276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054724213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0109661175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029850328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10881138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1842859705","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1209","title":"The Public Interest, Professionalism, and Pro Bono Publico","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Legal profession; Political science; Sociology; Point (geometry); Simple (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.21481834687733037,"score_gpt":0.41038436692733593,"score_spread":0.19556602005000556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1842859705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062233713,0.0032842641,0.011160711,0.22183248,0.00063070975,0.000046257894,0.000016867596,0.00005373158,0.7007413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97646797,0.0006907636,0.0010136442,0.009799797,0.0004710899,0.000045862067,0.0000059715526,0.000017108207,0.011487824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826088,0.009942372,0.0002890701,0.0010033232,0.0028580588,0.0032984028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787533,0.011006926,0.0024031422,0.0013451512,0.0017422247,0.0047492315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015030799,0.00033412248,0.0003151297,0.0016912572,0.009851283,0.014247758,0.0009702261,0.007819828,0.007561831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020970516,0.00037373576,0.00038508163,0.00085754844,0.043467607,0.009311798,0.008704309,0.0093684895,0.00075680594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016421445,0.000075439515,0.0010592623,0.000029252957,0.0000037187415,0.000059031594,0.002722608,0.00011393688,0.000081647464,0.98131275,0.0032194292,0.011306386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028945862,0.00009947802,0.0039148238,0.0004018745,0.000015295978,0.0003113679,0.00939022,0.00077864924,0.00050268916,0.8574963,0.12701681,0.00004343292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023450325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043030395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015030799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008215209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011290996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07949144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1843743322","doi":"","title":"Myths and Tips on the Support Guidelines","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Law; Political science; Operations research; Public relations; Psychology; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.057015752919928255,"score_gpt":0.4034267589419707,"score_spread":0.34641100602204244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1843743322","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004895569,0.0013138835,0.002333418,0.9791276,0.0056402097,0.000033681397,0.00003929542,0.000058952017,0.010963464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061699107,0.006793336,0.026293533,0.8563322,0.011480232,0.0009510567,0.00027509718,0.0003835161,0.03579189],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9022625,0.0511494,0.00968694,0.0034579367,0.028020188,0.0054230997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7790688,0.12187261,0.007119472,0.010278359,0.06982249,0.011838292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08928249,0.00085559406,0.0008720185,0.0034812186,0.009697929,0.016414069,0.005439154,0.0245405,0.010928454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31568474,0.0011530827,0.00087267515,0.0028440887,0.022279833,0.02780341,0.0093850065,0.04186892,0.0065030744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025998346,0.000048862425,0.00033150738,0.00019644442,0.000008367958,0.00014781274,0.0051738764,0.00017094101,0.00009470602,0.28036892,0.6787178,0.03471481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003919426,0.00003521794,0.00030182724,0.0014059101,0.00001153193,0.00019498254,0.0061452063,0.00026286405,0.00017266192,0.123416536,0.8679423,0.00007189841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0118997395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012732319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08928249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055244006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023399713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4721766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1843977442","doi":"10.7202/1032676ar","title":"Private International Law Implications in Conflicts of Interest for Lawyers Licensed in Multiple Countries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Law; Choice of law; Political science; Private law; Face (sociological concept); Subject (documents); Common law; Comparative law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.23781578822940264,"score_gpt":0.4188271401048644,"score_spread":0.18101135187546175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1843977442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06228062,0.0045513273,0.013740386,0.40079457,0.001470209,0.0001209396,0.00006303177,0.00003791384,0.51694095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9291682,0.002040475,0.0040219817,0.047164813,0.00080079015,0.00013540297,0.000041709016,0.000052339274,0.01657423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96672744,0.019630644,0.0012802654,0.002906406,0.0040483004,0.0054069976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9397897,0.040932268,0.005858083,0.002867998,0.005638186,0.004913724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025823906,0.00037395352,0.0005424863,0.00166071,0.018121539,0.018166179,0.0021374077,0.0130585255,0.013186852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08298632,0.00068114547,0.000845751,0.0021951955,0.04369343,0.019336127,0.013171441,0.015079964,0.0007856584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008978086,0.00004307862,0.0016035666,0.000026048245,0.000006950071,0.00055505737,0.0136254355,0.00019625144,0.0000689257,0.9682816,0.007955498,0.0076285754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039059694,0.000054418007,0.0046876,0.00095239223,0.000042547148,0.0014435987,0.06956931,0.00074352836,0.0004719524,0.76354945,0.1583724,0.00007367912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018120492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028734798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025823906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011405623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021000993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13657153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W184678394","doi":"","title":"Reflecting on Three Reviews of Reflection Without Rules","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflection (computer programming); Epistemology; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.16867140929002483,"score_gpt":0.42091115201078805,"score_spread":0.2522397427207632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W184678394","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1276457,0.072964184,0.039636623,0.46717328,0.13587205,0.0013658415,0.00084387977,0.00135537,0.15314318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60560423,0.02514067,0.03259009,0.11008867,0.030049367,0.0019283419,0.0011059847,0.0027153876,0.19077729],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9359704,0.039332733,0.0035145546,0.002987387,0.015000474,0.0031944858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74179393,0.15030023,0.011146472,0.025095172,0.06471335,0.0069508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03515345,0.0008604181,0.00082345196,0.005603842,0.0064688534,0.0087287,0.0021440878,0.005854063,0.004085401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21336368,0.0006592388,0.0010106792,0.0033717137,0.005097344,0.004757373,0.0077474355,0.010002119,0.0014527958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054053834,0.00019983771,0.0017594587,0.0017406394,0.00016331821,0.0010456523,0.13498883,0.00037426574,0.005311481,0.03611492,0.6383143,0.17944683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027239197,0.00021370577,0.002431746,0.0016596601,0.00007045608,0.00027491545,0.021461459,0.00021146938,0.0038569309,0.0033136795,0.9663907,0.00008792711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054483474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014387649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03515345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008679981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009791358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18591142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847535399","doi":"","title":"Archival Research in the History of the Law: A User's Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Archivist; Law; Excuse; Legal history; Political science; Law library; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.1339406817634796,"score_gpt":0.36232565690012836,"score_spread":0.22838497513664877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847535399","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02402653,0.10970151,0.009994722,0.6068081,0.0043687196,0.000087377855,0.00027161476,0.0002811513,0.24446021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6595831,0.14077108,0.01248225,0.116469674,0.01599342,0.00060549506,0.0002006012,0.00081331696,0.05308108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9574404,0.03519505,0.0012643967,0.0012708801,0.0034616035,0.0013676938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81828845,0.1610412,0.002173854,0.006466598,0.008848621,0.0031812273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052639093,0.00088965654,0.0021275887,0.016408496,0.026914166,0.049710408,0.0051720133,0.019099964,0.011136387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056336813,0.0013246684,0.0008731368,0.020450274,0.07366523,0.07409495,0.015618886,0.013291174,0.0015758835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029440323,0.0000494152,0.00091775454,0.00034801263,0.000008227655,0.00038372987,0.22029105,0.00005228532,0.000101630976,0.72771627,0.029553883,0.02054831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014160175,0.000080081285,0.0007233987,0.0027618443,0.000019352505,0.00089971937,0.25608924,0.00026533005,0.00022105187,0.1550016,0.5838749,0.000049409402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010724548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011875504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052639093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011611747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008284916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27838546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848332561","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice Metrics: Applicability to Service Delivery","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Service delivery framework; Service (business); Economic Justice; Business; Internet privacy; Political science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.05579260168031403,"score_gpt":0.3725999419171091,"score_spread":0.3168073402367951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1848332561","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013723822,0.0137296375,0.18397504,0.4395475,0.0027745422,0.0012898722,0.0043018362,0.0019661451,0.33869153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.717582,0.019366583,0.20157818,0.026829934,0.0042240196,0.0031774081,0.0023074278,0.0008468815,0.02408762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9616954,0.020944914,0.0035266816,0.0015629241,0.010746457,0.001523772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8765429,0.07573245,0.008155665,0.0067713954,0.028310737,0.004486726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027911426,0.00094576273,0.00094615575,0.008392722,0.003046685,0.010775394,0.0017028286,0.0046750433,0.0116374465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19115716,0.0005749974,0.0009961535,0.015933426,0.005668064,0.016673043,0.008273656,0.006057559,0.0022320198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037581533,0.000107738284,0.016133972,0.00048049298,0.000058703346,0.00011848364,0.0023804035,0.0023068986,0.00009397835,0.5403068,0.12686905,0.3111058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003328382,0.00014294342,0.020427262,0.0024300683,0.000044671524,0.0001707376,0.0047245394,0.009722938,0.00038031352,0.6484971,0.3132803,0.00014583002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032997258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026992183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032997258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010180867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016682912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1476115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1861573952","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v29i3.183337","title":"Emberley on Hot Button Politics in Canada's Universities: A Critique","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Politics; Restructuring; Higher education; False accusation; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Public administration; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.030190713389115907,"score_gpt":0.3715178976055174,"score_spread":0.3413271842164015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1861573952","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014127364,0.016523605,0.003339822,0.60091156,0.0011911716,0.000024063122,0.00011303218,0.00006311669,0.36370635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6474009,0.012838962,0.0016076828,0.24333104,0.0017256646,0.000080616664,0.000050897568,0.00019908417,0.09276513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905695,0.00157309,0.00015403517,0.00078595825,0.0041403566,0.0027771785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98977834,0.0054711252,0.0003343593,0.00025323415,0.002899123,0.0012637617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006432453,0.0007810389,0.0008530689,0.004052825,0.039451268,0.0199435,0.0038840116,0.016790472,0.0070115165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0152113335,0.0005127506,0.0006428212,0.0071886647,0.061957218,0.011260928,0.005197335,0.017652994,0.00072370033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009314187,0.000004742744,0.0002012305,0.00002310361,0.0000030753504,0.00008263288,0.008731844,0.00010423077,0.00002526398,0.94412947,0.04297424,0.0037109784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028870772,0.0000087831995,0.002216512,0.0005331758,0.000018760753,0.00011395452,0.026774585,0.0005477146,0.00024033834,0.30041635,0.66900975,0.000091303344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94670576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9501335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8982002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1017998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11505845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7386127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1869046865","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2349633","title":"The Future of Legal Education: Three Visions and a Prediction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Vision; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.007296153691436118,"score_gpt":0.3077334027635065,"score_spread":0.3004372490720704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1869046865","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09756373,0.01652106,0.017632054,0.7192736,0.0011316424,0.00012820332,0.0006700643,0.00018638627,0.14689319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811122,0.003959726,0.0050671133,0.0064350506,0.00072561245,0.00008979711,0.000141743,0.000023956118,0.002444912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966912,0.0011784172,0.00011668734,0.00054079783,0.000832181,0.00064070785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824608,0.0067984755,0.0024816745,0.0012266854,0.0040411223,0.0029912635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073468243,0.00075002306,0.00059246767,0.002706614,0.0035906006,0.009987826,0.001759601,0.005919467,0.009440645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01489741,0.000432121,0.0005679741,0.0014599646,0.016997335,0.024405163,0.005245899,0.0064110006,0.00084368803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002163502,0.00026465976,0.015656345,0.0002593567,0.000035392517,0.00015062884,0.0016422665,0.0017286893,0.00029864957,0.9207495,0.016953457,0.042044837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006676239,0.00008978928,0.009115852,0.00024229402,0.000028367684,0.00015263769,0.004729238,0.006188741,0.00025442953,0.96161157,0.017450128,0.00007018833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064976267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008191903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009987826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005721321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007843571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041511238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W187370142","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2606","title":"A Community of Procedure Scholars: Teaching Procedure and the Legal Academy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Dalhousie University; Queen's University","funders":"European Commission; University of Oxford","keywords":"Scholarship; Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Academic community; Economic Justice; Political science; Civil procedure; Sociology; Law; Library science; Social science; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.03921757857895782,"score_gpt":0.36200707918914404,"score_spread":0.32278950061018624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W187370142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6854419,0.0061273617,0.009704963,0.12668726,0.00051727553,0.00008299574,0.00004118905,0.00013012957,0.17126682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99190617,0.00093120313,0.0013142875,0.002330626,0.00025994692,0.00002901346,0.000015240048,0.000038329814,0.0031752328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96764404,0.021110494,0.00066912215,0.0021318009,0.005560491,0.0028840157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91143966,0.038037743,0.011472428,0.0053306203,0.0051429733,0.028576588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03307231,0.00022576372,0.0005624142,0.008005327,0.022346413,0.021798013,0.0026051498,0.0039000043,0.009249669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07510751,0.00035394978,0.00039713396,0.005322833,0.04764871,0.020887049,0.021399902,0.0047879997,0.0009965986],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071248476,0.00048752033,0.032403316,0.00012208738,0.000032322645,0.000306669,0.26829734,0.0003338341,0.0008024608,0.57759506,0.006654941,0.112893246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001071793,0.00031910857,0.03643503,0.0008103554,0.000036493617,0.00047229155,0.42064914,0.0011274489,0.00072156376,0.34911412,0.19011912,0.000088149834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033212977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065585333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007901761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01920921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17490518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1875753037","doi":"10.3968/5601","title":"On Conflicts and Reconciliation Between Judicial Examination and Undergraduate Law Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Test (biology); Law; Undergraduate education; Political science; Psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.04360118209250036,"score_gpt":0.38828044266649897,"score_spread":0.3446792605739986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1875753037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18717317,0.016429424,0.031954892,0.42244697,0.0030309777,0.0001816173,0.00010836608,0.00016355132,0.338511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717217,0.001714811,0.003755904,0.013370962,0.001002516,0.00007246443,0.000038973438,0.000034788216,0.008287999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95521945,0.027970647,0.0017056572,0.0037378843,0.008428222,0.0029380792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9554601,0.02221067,0.003934884,0.002729839,0.0073340563,0.008330507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025410516,0.00017469419,0.00036418225,0.0014348454,0.0031152156,0.011268481,0.0015996607,0.003451445,0.0037013893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084651574,0.00021538866,0.00024539148,0.0015716711,0.009042385,0.005191567,0.0062670624,0.005747851,0.00057587604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058058962,0.00015157125,0.0106527,0.00009047868,0.000008154232,0.00013836868,0.008356617,0.00019611187,0.0002839558,0.8621492,0.010354085,0.107560635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101995196,0.00052460964,0.08714531,0.0013312651,0.000036195543,0.00044876584,0.030416522,0.002192588,0.0014183703,0.6173098,0.25895151,0.00012315906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003929339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004783816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025410516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00683648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021562435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13438529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1877660563","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1262","title":"“In the Public Interest”: Understanding the Special Role of the Government Lawyer","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Duty; Government (linguistics); Statutory law; Law; Political science; Professional responsibility; Accountability; Privilege (computing); Independence (probability theory); Sociology","score_opus":0.12537515861139115,"score_gpt":0.36462496471338257,"score_spread":0.23924980610199142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1877660563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07329762,0.01255118,0.0223569,0.23407407,0.0004895604,0.000080790844,0.00007584503,0.000061020313,0.657013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673519,0.0034727158,0.0025475158,0.009073854,0.00031308766,0.000044829667,0.000042026957,0.000036926802,0.017117132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995357,0.002197268,0.00009032471,0.0003241919,0.00069112936,0.0013400539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966118,0.0017040765,0.00040685936,0.0002114022,0.0005074086,0.0005583531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050505535,0.00041859652,0.00035429074,0.0019243684,0.012973366,0.018782862,0.0028658446,0.0077507673,0.0032054451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005180617,0.0005121668,0.00038957974,0.0019433978,0.07699045,0.019087179,0.00518203,0.0070487075,0.00052088307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037678428,0.000008123272,0.00042909023,0.000026416494,0.0000011195292,0.0001167986,0.03324953,0.00009132374,0.000057173143,0.96135324,0.002392017,0.0022714247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000160853,0.000016197271,0.0033493633,0.00036754875,0.000010650671,0.00020499724,0.06383999,0.0009506498,0.00021617547,0.7202336,0.21076992,0.00002467649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3595478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3669992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3595478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058346182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03823623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71491003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882616792","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2761","title":"What is Access to Justice?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Phrase; Sociology; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.08212132142299404,"score_gpt":0.43906419654195983,"score_spread":0.3569428751189658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1882616792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030535256,0.027899716,0.005104737,0.5822657,0.0016280229,0.00003449079,0.00042731964,0.000058185087,0.35204655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9366398,0.021565966,0.00081492955,0.030376248,0.002141433,0.000044778233,0.00017327949,0.00004598452,0.008197566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901545,0.0046458836,0.0003678838,0.0009392298,0.002192189,0.0017003184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98585665,0.007467484,0.0013932874,0.00068505656,0.0019488124,0.002648828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004991339,0.00019591066,0.0006079293,0.0024807788,0.005040543,0.012972005,0.0009733648,0.0038542226,0.012609837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024539404,0.00020113701,0.00035784545,0.0025971693,0.022322444,0.01708438,0.0042044832,0.004718311,0.0015172729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017579905,0.000037126087,0.0050858157,0.00023316113,0.000023569874,0.00020163986,0.009474451,0.00011054761,0.000092559545,0.91070604,0.030071417,0.04394607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062307986,0.000028470104,0.008418573,0.0016836311,0.000018530938,0.00039986675,0.017216545,0.00018678034,0.00010492946,0.7483084,0.22358936,0.000038565002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01074232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007478591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99438983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00561017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061480654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042184114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188339016","doi":"","title":"Accountability and records appraisal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Variety (cybernetics); Perspective (graphical); Politics; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04629311204155685,"score_gpt":0.3871044488198349,"score_spread":0.3408113367782781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W188339016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011633907,0.030076638,0.104309924,0.34601006,0.01605254,0.0025281,0.0014252734,0.0009386507,0.48702487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68845487,0.03997091,0.09382423,0.032442085,0.023214662,0.0040250574,0.002937666,0.00096400233,0.11416648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.60311365,0.2541583,0.0366224,0.011294403,0.08616282,0.008648477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3680205,0.348602,0.069832586,0.037141096,0.1648384,0.011565411],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20342143,0.00080389204,0.0017171018,0.018024271,0.0068397955,0.022204967,0.0034701333,0.004185051,0.012553286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5302981,0.0006949274,0.000908707,0.014809181,0.011229202,0.021064157,0.008541402,0.0063459054,0.0047296775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001324478,0.00007480062,0.0103009,0.0020724668,0.00009797471,0.00030910203,0.010708658,0.0008321447,0.00020499289,0.48681223,0.16012369,0.32833064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004845076,0.00016589013,0.011860474,0.0063818684,0.00008214005,0.0006266356,0.010961465,0.0014416737,0.0006406644,0.20599012,0.7615836,0.00021705698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012324555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008346739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20342143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014361633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046952743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98232317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883554158","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4421","title":"LOOKING FOR QUALITY: THE EMPIRICAL DEBATE IN ACCESS TO JUSTICE RESEARCH","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; CONTEST; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5530687811844535,"score_gpt":0.6007818828052836,"score_spread":0.04771310162083009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883554158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011800528,0.21015905,0.009671339,0.72868615,0.0037597143,0.00004731261,0.00026927335,0.000021797106,0.035584822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6242046,0.17211986,0.00845731,0.16742587,0.021974562,0.00034474325,0.00045194328,0.0003052314,0.0047159186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8601644,0.09724553,0.005321533,0.009718462,0.024248492,0.003301673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36707512,0.5775812,0.017419124,0.013647473,0.019060178,0.005216861],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.122140616,0.00073675916,0.0028099914,0.011618535,0.008841603,0.02597394,0.0056462274,0.010266655,0.011621656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34917942,0.00079255685,0.0014712709,0.022860063,0.09583956,0.05892793,0.013283178,0.01950529,0.001142054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054469,0.00006802972,0.0050870897,0.0014338905,0.00009854046,0.00006902661,0.010006424,0.00016293107,0.000033595872,0.92855537,0.016124463,0.03830619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003644547,0.000060179373,0.005367616,0.010073854,0.00007074558,0.000118419375,0.017174127,0.00036645963,0.00008244347,0.91039824,0.056194026,0.000057409703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016487425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011719329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87785935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016134553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014649441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.645949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1888207123","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1478722","title":"Law and Learning in an Era of Globalization","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.014542279891568078,"score_gpt":0.3538378165767485,"score_spread":0.3392955366851804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1888207123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10854521,0.017314449,0.006581195,0.17443733,0.000583338,0.000027727609,0.000037284473,0.00007028247,0.6924032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704127,0.004986643,0.0016459131,0.00837592,0.0004152382,0.000027267004,0.000013807759,0.00003299465,0.01408961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689865,0.0019228434,0.00005256262,0.000271605,0.00043248115,0.00042192359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703825,0.001404475,0.00028548748,0.00031755562,0.00023955342,0.0007148048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004291986,0.00030295088,0.0004309104,0.0009849205,0.0066602216,0.011022986,0.00056167465,0.0031301766,0.0060193003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039780186,0.00017739042,0.00021781882,0.0011452399,0.039242633,0.013793464,0.00947153,0.0037528204,0.00048860663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000638454,0.000018689623,0.0005211531,0.000024069028,0.0000028548038,0.000116697476,0.019819481,0.00016714596,0.000070094145,0.9658089,0.0033434834,0.010101049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011037049,0.00002841159,0.0012716876,0.00017039219,0.000004099027,0.0001404549,0.02244524,0.00024713873,0.000090089634,0.79531974,0.18025783,0.000013893661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034932818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039523914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011022986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056462274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004427457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04096645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1895512462","doi":"","title":"Adding Color to the White Paper: Time for a Robust Reciprocal Relationship between Procedural Justice and Therapeutic Jurisprudence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Therapeutic jurisprudence; Jurisprudence; White (mutation); Procedural justice; Reciprocal; Economic Justice; White paper; Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.06558974602626799,"score_gpt":0.35974370216881124,"score_spread":0.29415395614254325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1895512462","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007259051,0.008697128,0.009953264,0.78176695,0.13771547,0.000078553414,0.00009577548,0.0001857873,0.06078112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039612796,0.010114101,0.01658573,0.6317038,0.074745715,0.0003758858,0.0001658792,0.0012960784,0.2254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97215277,0.009389488,0.0013382155,0.002906128,0.0127787115,0.001434791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89479,0.056159984,0.0031079953,0.0070113936,0.034403984,0.0045266068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024513325,0.0005742022,0.001156873,0.0026638843,0.013873653,0.019359602,0.0027278673,0.01085202,0.02326527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.144606,0.0008334324,0.0011700301,0.0024077615,0.017189562,0.015529892,0.0063651414,0.028828448,0.008013006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016932245,0.0000105490835,0.00009301765,0.000112721194,0.000011486447,0.000094239665,0.0010174008,0.000035071684,0.00019085071,0.13209389,0.84184295,0.024480812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015283335,0.000014845291,0.00036476718,0.0004298637,0.000017122138,0.00008865293,0.0010298155,0.00013453614,0.00020714007,0.044561926,0.9530958,0.0000402635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044315692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0832962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044315692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025376877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1296404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899744659","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1126","title":"From Liberal Extremity to Safe Mainstream? The Comparative Controversies of Witness Preparation in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Commentary on Evidence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Cross-examination; Mainstream; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Element (criminal law); Divergence (linguistics); Expert witness; Professional conduct; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.11921830649706305,"score_gpt":0.45123315576950046,"score_spread":0.3320148492724374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899744659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27908278,0.06319339,0.0029135372,0.2493818,0.0016952367,0.000036167305,0.00018918046,0.000032751715,0.40347517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704772,0.010274533,0.0004288386,0.01633372,0.00034340133,0.000030906926,0.00004880563,0.000020640591,0.0020419145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98553145,0.009287538,0.00060355506,0.0009738038,0.0021298735,0.0014738549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97242886,0.020627512,0.0016221424,0.0014652859,0.0025353604,0.0013208649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02295798,0.00017343496,0.0006126769,0.0030322298,0.01017058,0.01278711,0.0013025965,0.0047500054,0.005287633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035513476,0.00032493795,0.0004303265,0.003846598,0.020083144,0.008204672,0.0064758235,0.0069877533,0.00032784985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022833975,0.00008569602,0.0040275846,0.00023073892,0.000043971864,0.00020678628,0.05787248,0.00018348874,0.00034993398,0.83653754,0.009831269,0.090402134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010670114,0.00032517765,0.052007318,0.0052302442,0.00017878691,0.0003820998,0.16414686,0.0003607557,0.0022659323,0.32453173,0.4502913,0.00017301556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03568135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06700829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03568135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006655879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007117128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12141484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189986100","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001486","title":"Nurturing Commitment in the Legal Profession: Student Experiences with the Osgoode Public Interest Requirement","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Political science; Law; Public interest; Legal profession; Work (physics); Practice of law; Legal education; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09629140431203458,"score_gpt":0.43894372862530706,"score_spread":0.34265232431327247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189986100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793255,0.00042832564,0.0004073302,0.010263809,0.0003338114,0.00008384374,0.000025943773,0.000039237973,0.009092295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758381,0.0007454478,0.00066223077,0.0064659356,0.00010628006,0.00007979884,0.000049942744,0.000097636475,0.015954565],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98882407,0.005006406,0.00027401478,0.000731111,0.0019686136,0.0031957303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980977,0.0039354535,0.0012246697,0.0005462885,0.002266017,0.011050682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010113241,0.000943822,0.0013568851,0.001572561,0.036203664,0.017061735,0.00390921,0.006309373,0.00597451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019010575,0.001728802,0.0009100452,0.001405425,0.018538008,0.008129698,0.018291093,0.015875237,0.0012678052],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033795484,0.0005489115,0.006038375,0.00004925272,0.000008444738,0.001165824,0.9781773,0.00003193184,0.0003785469,0.001317586,0.0058045653,0.006445367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008294215,0.00017877556,0.0024825926,0.000056437944,0.0000056492304,0.0004237083,0.97189796,0.0000851135,0.00018449254,0.00028008583,0.024364837,0.000032083273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030793056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08228201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036203664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007969018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009454166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06122768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900282626","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v30i1.183345","title":"A Discussion of Autonomy in the Relationship Between the Law Society of Upper Canada and the University-Based Law Schools","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Legal education; Law; Premise; Legal profession; Sociology; Socialization; Professional responsibility; Political science; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Sociology of law; Social science","score_opus":0.029955283172055213,"score_gpt":0.30481013497787063,"score_spread":0.2748548518058154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1900282626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3843813,0.008597002,0.0048063975,0.19811507,0.00032882133,0.000067958834,0.00010171985,0.000029295146,0.4035724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841817,0.0013563285,0.00045178455,0.0033644596,0.000066984074,0.00001606528,0.000014983944,0.000008466018,0.010539239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993687,0.0012900454,0.00009693285,0.0004230604,0.0019247521,0.0025781738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99419206,0.0019939516,0.00052798184,0.00012355772,0.0011070194,0.002055303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025049413,0.00022944807,0.00027694917,0.001772276,0.028861525,0.008248356,0.001587219,0.0027391387,0.0036054768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061935917,0.00022396576,0.00047118854,0.0028723655,0.048465844,0.004647423,0.005803809,0.0034931737,0.000121182675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010834632,0.0000144538035,0.0073680915,0.000032815537,0.000004468123,0.00044629272,0.13789472,0.0002673504,0.0002109809,0.84273547,0.0033297057,0.007684866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029184552,0.000040643357,0.076114275,0.00041139586,0.00002846736,0.00042516296,0.25283167,0.0010728854,0.00036630442,0.14800358,0.5205539,0.00012260853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97405505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88609433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113905676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12628812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82644737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905383749","doi":"","title":"Hard to know: what is hard knowledge?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Need to know; Data science; Computer security","score_opus":0.07902936040241831,"score_gpt":0.37909619969897246,"score_spread":0.30006683929655414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905383749","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013136916,0.087357074,0.004790336,0.8569366,0.0056332983,0.000056373396,0.00026275247,0.00007624688,0.031750444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57133716,0.13441427,0.0056522656,0.25760916,0.018756848,0.00024202927,0.00044577385,0.00020547419,0.01133701],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851946,0.006924362,0.0011341973,0.0015380172,0.003688579,0.0015202262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90393674,0.06291257,0.006545214,0.004271613,0.011300193,0.0110337045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013752089,0.00069826265,0.0024892194,0.0058538495,0.0062288204,0.017727753,0.002583719,0.00884953,0.01113874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.091721594,0.00060953695,0.00087687065,0.0037452567,0.043062095,0.037410032,0.008210885,0.012454989,0.0026612266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030839327,0.00047599772,0.019726308,0.004641412,0.00034985316,0.0022351753,0.04927429,0.00034317162,0.00035341652,0.21228059,0.25666773,0.45334363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006465125,0.00015574154,0.006437411,0.010024972,0.00011220317,0.0026860165,0.063394405,0.000302401,0.00029417436,0.743737,0.17261387,0.00017712424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009395412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006563217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017727753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00590703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012265138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07272887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1922350498","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1029","title":"Convergence of Law and Policy and the Role of the Attorney General","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Amateur; Political science; Officer; Government (linguistics); Convergence (economics); Position (finance); Christian ministry; Business; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04837447085377377,"score_gpt":0.35926071848747154,"score_spread":0.31088624763369777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1922350498","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09099933,0.015623819,0.009872762,0.54671335,0.0007900281,0.000101935024,0.00007398293,0.000080232225,0.33574465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612206,0.0025909957,0.0020326655,0.01835759,0.00050396734,0.00005962289,0.00002876273,0.000043547134,0.015162273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95464665,0.01995883,0.0015355813,0.0035186212,0.0108713405,0.009469048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9593466,0.017073682,0.003031212,0.0015888913,0.011988926,0.0069707828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037501156,0.00022607733,0.00092971703,0.0040725623,0.010226898,0.023488615,0.0024013517,0.011865605,0.0047789584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0858279,0.0005051844,0.0005476935,0.0033681442,0.03477953,0.015097076,0.009669325,0.012314901,0.0005120463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019661058,0.00002049901,0.002248475,0.00003479714,0.000012835931,0.00009988404,0.0044820393,0.0005348927,0.00006525353,0.97752804,0.005392633,0.009561004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082581224,0.00010607068,0.031376734,0.00104293,0.00006373112,0.00030422918,0.021052672,0.004837589,0.00062285847,0.7402662,0.20010898,0.0001353882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3022208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17180079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3022208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059710685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07280516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6009233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926853064","doi":"10.1007/s10833-008-9097-3","title":"Considering the ethical potential of professional communities","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Educational Change","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.2463512642464355,"score_gpt":0.4575197047618218,"score_spread":0.2111684405153863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926853064","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0313193,0.0019735885,0.008412585,0.8511025,0.0019073853,0.00006073523,0.000010627497,0.000017695435,0.10519559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9118841,0.0007303167,0.0040008975,0.07209431,0.0021556357,0.00011251055,0.000007664211,0.00003798609,0.008976558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9155626,0.06169206,0.0015764162,0.003411859,0.010419236,0.007337738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7970411,0.15281098,0.00712521,0.008300785,0.018178834,0.01654307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.075137354,0.0004808978,0.00082125637,0.001851453,0.026708174,0.021950193,0.0033185743,0.04244495,0.0056897285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15252793,0.0005299541,0.0008957731,0.00078593515,0.089469105,0.015879663,0.014587354,0.030414404,0.0005587642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022507476,0.000068111,0.0012567883,0.000049760743,0.000020256257,0.00071271195,0.019155828,0.0003025968,0.000120899305,0.948481,0.020249847,0.009559682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035935922,0.000028204626,0.00040906534,0.00025854676,0.000017195887,0.0004710143,0.023422476,0.0006666514,0.00018993703,0.91122806,0.06324893,0.000023935747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057447283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011463338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075137354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073869973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029869437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3973691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1929795980","doi":"","title":"Depending on the Kindness of Strangers: Access to Civil Justice in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Obligation; Kindness; Economic Justice; Legal service; Political science; Law; Legal profession; Public relations","score_opus":0.0696123842958125,"score_gpt":0.31754488804513964,"score_spread":0.24793250374932713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1929795980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84995466,0.008810258,0.00047461616,0.053943444,0.00039752864,0.00014991383,0.0014668505,0.000036623085,0.08476621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97815096,0.0059112892,0.00029687808,0.0031784116,0.00003584161,0.00002612917,0.00030085407,0.000024585725,0.012075072],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572057,0.0003480444,0.00010302497,0.00028895776,0.0013311554,0.0022082692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922989,0.0008632236,0.0006045677,0.00011905064,0.0027518508,0.0033624608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019102696,0.00030554988,0.00061432144,0.0026736748,0.026187558,0.005747134,0.0024698183,0.0015318949,0.00812283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006301853,0.00044041916,0.00055516075,0.0061767846,0.006297056,0.0020130754,0.005133926,0.0034948143,0.00029288573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023035018,0.000258845,0.32769144,0.0007063971,0.00013556765,0.0033748068,0.34744865,0.00058028166,0.0011174998,0.07182487,0.07521078,0.1714206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027185599,0.000057281362,0.39168206,0.0007909537,0.000077799894,0.00068093167,0.47827435,0.0005051397,0.00039049887,0.0033971795,0.12388779,0.00022885966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99979454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14981002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14981002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1867708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1931600816","doi":"","title":"The Law Professor as Public Citizen: Measuring Public Engagement in Canadian Common Law Schools","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.10679788982167389,"score_gpt":0.3745206995044524,"score_spread":0.2677228096827785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1931600816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9452797,0.00036266397,0.0006767064,0.0065698903,0.00007102864,0.00022282572,0.00047475577,0.0000333131,0.04630912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99201936,0.00018477008,0.00034552498,0.0006702371,0.000019784984,0.00012078417,0.0002333742,0.000016891454,0.0063893213],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96028125,0.009884364,0.00095995376,0.002769183,0.014457822,0.01164741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9172169,0.017719533,0.010527592,0.002413052,0.025126623,0.02699632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02035053,0.00047640913,0.0008574124,0.007825383,0.03555512,0.013266539,0.0060021016,0.0053607095,0.0074719726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067974076,0.0007759953,0.00066481694,0.011876421,0.010697991,0.0062581925,0.012900535,0.006917131,0.00097328273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017913886,0.00078961346,0.5433675,0.00013492304,0.000055837154,0.0001790118,0.3838889,0.00039442684,0.00036500336,0.017969027,0.016246505,0.036430083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018946994,0.00010132986,0.5302771,0.00023433538,0.000054967342,0.000042543907,0.4174177,0.0009006377,0.0003526215,0.0015132176,0.04898717,0.00009954971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98444957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99439347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8321893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16781068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24645247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96522164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1931612596","doi":"","title":"캐나다의 로-스쿨에 대한 고찰","year":2005,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"행정법연구","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Law; Curriculum; Political science; Educational institution; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.05358897449868403,"score_gpt":0.41630600434395887,"score_spread":0.3627170298452748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1931612596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013362844,0.0049386304,0.005503703,0.052794956,0.0075748605,0.00013661859,0.00018737429,0.00027995874,0.915221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.117833436,0.004541183,0.0038813564,0.013447,0.0010051355,0.00006876103,0.00016732667,0.00010076275,0.858955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993699,0.00007630464,0.000011969738,0.00004899488,0.00033294281,0.00015995215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928004,0.000054510612,0.000021989355,0.000018448856,0.00044416566,0.00018073666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048492345,0.00026285136,0.00012717793,0.0005221419,0.0043190513,0.0030734097,0.00042880402,0.000817925,0.044606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091832614,0.00011123184,0.00017395931,0.00046325976,0.0021067446,0.0012365362,0.0011905635,0.0017397088,0.010967007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028676737,0.00013259584,0.0044073206,0.00015400484,0.0000034635725,0.00036429695,0.009148316,0.00024364583,0.001690597,0.18021457,0.6485143,0.15509824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013406259,0.000016336293,0.003016755,0.00005064564,0.0000014236848,0.00009570364,0.0026920964,0.00009525919,0.00025283417,0.0021453747,0.991625,0.0000072316957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25610468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5224169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99030316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009696811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008330215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.509228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935262925","doi":"","title":"Book Review of \"Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2nd ed.)\"","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Encyclopedia; Engineering ethics; Professional ethics; Information ethics; Sociology; Library science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.038835631101764086,"score_gpt":0.3777036756794595,"score_spread":0.3388680445776954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935262925","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033758325,0.7888617,0.0033424965,0.03243537,0.050419476,0.00013020002,0.0007121423,0.00032928877,0.12343174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028313417,0.6474415,0.004341438,0.021881422,0.02678465,0.00027352409,0.0012238204,0.00037725797,0.294845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984195,0.00030728822,0.0001330673,0.000159208,0.00089417154,0.000086724816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99626786,0.0017588877,0.0002640039,0.00012943614,0.0012864615,0.0002934324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013470114,0.0013854488,0.0015386459,0.005558917,0.0011290498,0.0046018967,0.0013892574,0.0019477005,0.058207992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005239351,0.00058546657,0.00086675864,0.0068401587,0.0013114087,0.004115337,0.00158409,0.0037929746,0.040693868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011099914,0.0000136648505,0.00004150012,0.00094251154,0.0000059648714,0.00005237853,0.000090707115,0.00007029915,0.000113866,0.004551318,0.89302045,0.10108627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022392485,0.000006371638,0.0001969481,0.0007688595,0.0000030961128,0.00017097608,0.00003808605,0.00002392211,0.000025375644,0.0016969498,0.9970619,0.0000053831654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003770929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010263767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058207992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020875977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005671021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1947251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1936306142","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1951912","title":"Positivism and the Separation of Law and Jurisprudence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal positivism; Positivism; Law; Political science; Separation (statistics); Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Computer science","score_opus":0.025938667506056105,"score_gpt":0.3549935766101529,"score_spread":0.3290549091040968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1936306142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0788011,0.012048029,0.15747203,0.17210594,0.0013256342,0.00011564311,0.00012934676,0.00015008822,0.57785213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785347,0.0009252565,0.00958419,0.003672116,0.0005541248,0.00013424871,0.000035455112,0.000063975385,0.006495866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765437,0.017116977,0.0006855242,0.0017915784,0.0027802652,0.0010818767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9587321,0.032410543,0.0018148315,0.00338513,0.0023212158,0.0013361949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02389111,0.0006348738,0.001467043,0.0038752123,0.007540276,0.01472595,0.0027676735,0.0059857946,0.0045416728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02314168,0.0009355698,0.0011861104,0.0019482531,0.11899896,0.014184336,0.006998329,0.011461247,0.00052082026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024695144,0.000004667266,0.00003918493,0.0000060074854,0.0000018601804,0.000004178801,0.00073331996,0.000045633573,0.0000083390805,0.99872154,0.00013342859,0.00029928554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012652523,0.000003029579,0.000046198096,0.000014807469,0.0000017589311,0.000009755252,0.0002649825,0.00020416027,0.000022648765,0.9974567,0.001960433,0.0000029355458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005850582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005313561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02389111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012561814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010424746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12634975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941135740","doi":"","title":"The Good, the Right, and the Lawyer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Vision; Law; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Pluralism (philosophy); Legal ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028957116607464695,"score_gpt":0.3770222863005822,"score_spread":0.3480651696931175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941135740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024980899,0.021451524,0.015459056,0.41072363,0.003401165,0.000037557147,0.000025579016,0.000057239584,0.5238633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8628226,0.009042858,0.005908674,0.051874768,0.0021471553,0.0000669271,0.00002548305,0.00007418498,0.06803739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98500174,0.009156444,0.00040905827,0.0009056153,0.0027263726,0.001800628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880877,0.008065001,0.0009426082,0.0007261499,0.00078483217,0.001393737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009842474,0.00035143964,0.0008428523,0.001143924,0.009437578,0.0155141745,0.0011610576,0.0086769825,0.007269478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015852792,0.0004110501,0.00046383947,0.0008310755,0.05143838,0.01857,0.007830335,0.011408074,0.0010120503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000468421,0.000014358281,0.00011991606,0.000023463928,0.0000021750282,0.00003436993,0.0033803626,0.00002983151,0.000027799026,0.9885895,0.004534391,0.0032390957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013096359,0.0000270561,0.00033919537,0.00024466112,0.00000599555,0.00013247595,0.008903847,0.00014681579,0.000117206684,0.81370264,0.17634933,0.000017665147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035016295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004217556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0155141745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057265665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007841151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052052557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W194334780","doi":"","title":"Regulating Legal Competence","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Accounting; Psychology; Business; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07439553631631018,"score_gpt":0.45728065463322415,"score_spread":0.38288511831691396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W194334780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003415331,0.002659033,0.0030957842,0.021566292,0.00024176015,0.000075445074,0.00015385641,0.00007783424,0.96871465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50357664,0.00566558,0.005483115,0.027663413,0.0007429122,0.00028295364,0.00037731125,0.0002159286,0.45599225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98649687,0.0018109211,0.00040024222,0.0012537235,0.0076550846,0.0023832298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904598,0.0029373437,0.00052933465,0.00128268,0.0038352446,0.0009557076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073024184,0.00048424306,0.0005377677,0.0024187372,0.0068775145,0.013064421,0.0018960246,0.009893078,0.021905228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02434399,0.00048640842,0.0006055881,0.0012718817,0.018964522,0.0048546386,0.007530109,0.006774283,0.004707519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003483171,0.000007845091,0.00023825333,0.00003106193,0.0000027781173,0.000051530416,0.0014429257,0.00009383424,0.0002774964,0.96432686,0.026083136,0.0074408916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023167875,0.000022387869,0.0024056286,0.0007854315,0.000020812358,0.00013964357,0.00216871,0.00052419683,0.0011961327,0.33943152,0.65324175,0.00004055504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22333692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23794954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22333692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01736349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038986396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44407392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945393226","doi":"","title":"Testing Theory and Debunking Stereotypes: Lawyers' Views on the Practice of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Anecdote; Perspective (graphical); Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Private practice; Corporate governance; Law; Ethical code; Sample (material); Political science; Sociology; Management; Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.04222516517689316,"score_gpt":0.37527332252974277,"score_spread":0.3330481573528496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945393226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97267747,0.00039876264,0.001378018,0.0075864824,0.0000327661,0.00003934689,0.000019101564,0.000009934041,0.017858073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824417,0.00015314095,0.00020392044,0.0005416523,0.000015018787,0.000011336592,0.000010341673,0.000006537824,0.00081385503],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9673457,0.02017688,0.0008719729,0.0012429061,0.008109992,0.0022525673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90366894,0.06871441,0.014579648,0.0037349286,0.006770549,0.0025315501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03236005,0.00041675146,0.0005937783,0.004826578,0.013190943,0.009089847,0.0022955376,0.0028899165,0.0032725143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08211392,0.00061624165,0.00036491675,0.0030627076,0.041839723,0.0071986187,0.006322942,0.004747281,0.00025334614],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037519567,0.00002174309,0.01740731,0.00003770548,0.000006199706,0.0001705591,0.9709755,0.000024562443,0.00025780342,0.004698475,0.0003067743,0.006055834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013021529,0.000038525555,0.016986154,0.00013614591,0.000010222607,0.00011766727,0.9715494,0.00018641642,0.00024595423,0.0041330177,0.006567339,0.00001618063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1615484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19606858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1615484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018473847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010352145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32121617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951415956","doi":"","title":"Issues and Challenges in Training Needs Assessment (TNA): Judicial Education in a Rule of Law Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Competence (human resources); Tribunal; Judicial review; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.057839958448029145,"score_gpt":0.40839155889205886,"score_spread":0.3505516004440297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1951415956","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016644834,0.022751698,0.019851154,0.87416446,0.0019471175,0.0003555178,0.000084679414,0.000044449112,0.06415606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8013242,0.024313446,0.059771348,0.102991685,0.0027748537,0.0017239096,0.00011038431,0.00008121767,0.0069089322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8412617,0.12637497,0.006977291,0.0053666546,0.013450464,0.0065688877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81529754,0.15233403,0.0041816044,0.0026246223,0.017109139,0.008453008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13256162,0.0010389898,0.0020231842,0.010250827,0.022767551,0.036298703,0.008202327,0.021814574,0.0036802252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10602132,0.0011799111,0.0012892085,0.0102078505,0.07469538,0.037948318,0.021479102,0.024902645,0.0007004761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002273807,0.0002483112,0.0040793717,0.0012049524,0.00002742599,0.00086470577,0.13390164,0.0005808134,0.000132369,0.7300372,0.023326337,0.10557416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025027754,0.00010744596,0.00398573,0.00533987,0.00001856182,0.0006537235,0.45068574,0.0015565495,0.00013030665,0.43305314,0.10433377,0.00011012653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040803805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044818748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13256162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029974997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06570401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70106125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953461327","doi":"","title":"Write Me a Memo","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal writing; Punctuation; Rubric; Action (physics); Style (visual arts); Spelling; Grammar; Computer science; Law; Political science; Psychology; Legal research; Linguistics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.014514741084088338,"score_gpt":0.3546276164529646,"score_spread":0.34011287536887624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953461327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0102859745,0.00486209,0.020297522,0.13610235,0.11659225,0.0011822114,0.004860324,0.0038423033,0.701975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05668521,0.0038529981,0.017262079,0.035829443,0.018874867,0.0010960092,0.0027436172,0.002263806,0.86139196],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876094,0.00056656246,0.00007798306,0.00012938799,0.00035540748,0.00010979854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912622,0.0032195135,0.0005277137,0.0008500545,0.0030816237,0.0010589531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018957026,0.0010489853,0.00041071617,0.0010453331,0.0034653544,0.004261143,0.00080582703,0.0019600135,0.15899584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020813487,0.0003079867,0.00037963907,0.00069515,0.001402891,0.004324536,0.0026136304,0.0029769454,0.10199137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041229243,0.000028856915,0.00017368012,0.00018630651,0.0000058994415,0.00018280411,0.004154926,0.000040220275,0.0006297192,0.006409297,0.95243055,0.035716593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003920657,0.000024638945,0.00014328831,0.00009360558,0.0000016981362,0.0001440923,0.0020235828,0.00004147001,0.00022691849,0.0012593684,0.99602926,0.000008141148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048003727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008088775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15899584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000811927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010541049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5318941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954421527","doi":"10.22024/unikent/03/fal.84","title":"'Don't Read the Comments!' Reflections on Writing and Publishing Feminist Socio-Legal Research as a Young Scholar","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Scope (computer science); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Section (typography); Product (mathematics); Media studies; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10926370531188222,"score_gpt":0.4356540884666846,"score_spread":0.32639038315480234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1954421527","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01375329,0.015361163,0.0010746137,0.89694536,0.027657958,0.000058235288,0.00005032923,0.00008415339,0.045014847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31708303,0.022279674,0.0021459884,0.49452093,0.02605707,0.00043623667,0.0000823102,0.0012069563,0.13618779],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91510916,0.060470074,0.0018016696,0.002684961,0.013741875,0.006192227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8173623,0.13086714,0.0094391005,0.003948376,0.023286847,0.015096274],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.067339666,0.00088130124,0.0012927504,0.0026381074,0.04141514,0.03590731,0.0043212706,0.018333232,0.008980827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13484591,0.0012736813,0.00092259847,0.0029252225,0.045342013,0.023090454,0.014739481,0.034184523,0.0036857456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025358653,0.00003137414,0.00033783852,0.00023286116,0.000008620454,0.0016375307,0.6863928,0.00003130355,0.0002838403,0.06892564,0.23266417,0.009428737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063852885,0.000023105778,0.00017402007,0.0006309505,0.0000037033892,0.00032905847,0.26052725,0.000021777114,0.00019649822,0.0036962146,0.73436683,0.000024131772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014624917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02126246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93266034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015880385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02164271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35613042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957243631","doi":"","title":"A new expectation for post-secondary librarians: faculty status, collective agreements, and the online evidence of teaching","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Mathematics education; Psychology; Medical education; Computer science; Library science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.07316290212598249,"score_gpt":0.3462626030938979,"score_spread":0.2730997009679154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957243631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91022116,0.00076828874,0.0004301386,0.01774069,0.000047430927,0.000038706123,0.00009744258,0.000012984329,0.07064324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670583,0.00019871959,0.00009522739,0.00031507935,0.000017421182,0.000011297811,0.000024316689,0.0000050448066,0.0026270142],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98674446,0.0037091451,0.0004972175,0.00070214,0.006009775,0.002337249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9321732,0.03324026,0.01089537,0.003467232,0.011145144,0.009078813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016354306,0.00014069138,0.0003627197,0.00406985,0.015087606,0.012741079,0.0016148153,0.0015679148,0.006431981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047100987,0.00028156847,0.00018707236,0.0060568303,0.02202718,0.0076925308,0.007771551,0.0032056083,0.00032832217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058939357,0.00012942846,0.092011034,0.00012841902,0.0000067856613,0.00041501047,0.81275773,0.000044734228,0.00031670913,0.052878108,0.0035033766,0.037749838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003629859,0.000021811624,0.05519437,0.00014792942,0.0000046658392,0.00007247668,0.924698,0.00005160288,0.00024185472,0.0025066785,0.017044147,0.000012909359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39911726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47276267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39911726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024072492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043031678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7935883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957419446","doi":"10.7202/1032811ar","title":"L’enseignement du droit aux « non-initiés » : le cas des sciences de l’information","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Information science; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.1089571088983554,"score_gpt":0.4437733307470572,"score_spread":0.3348162218487018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957419446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1432181,0.011858013,0.02782447,0.09446188,0.00086823857,0.00024953528,0.00019773138,0.00023620344,0.72108585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8312269,0.0067137913,0.0054836464,0.0032243442,0.00035940975,0.00011365672,0.00012088673,0.00015242115,0.15260503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98245347,0.008088785,0.0005740486,0.0013980633,0.0055279764,0.0019577222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661738,0.019359624,0.0028306884,0.0027418865,0.005511958,0.0033820218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0125754895,0.0003949478,0.0005577352,0.0033612398,0.016896408,0.029231247,0.0026700003,0.0046948525,0.017663674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040055975,0.0005206408,0.00044615753,0.0051068733,0.028755993,0.016108504,0.0093526915,0.0063990382,0.0023042862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027017775,0.000037821,0.0022323865,0.00021647343,0.000005243587,0.00048240865,0.19435026,0.00013244155,0.0003897008,0.7612083,0.0066878316,0.03423012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018121998,0.000053624775,0.0051533375,0.00087409484,0.000015452626,0.00051228516,0.10984092,0.00045164922,0.0012580893,0.06767172,0.8140949,0.000055858345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22085223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24185903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22085223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03957812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05546001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43913347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958633578","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1157886","title":"Bertha Wilson's Practice Years (1958-1975): Establishing a Research Practice and Founding a Research Department in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Practice research; Sociology; Library science; Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.11246976093954006,"score_gpt":0.454983057005886,"score_spread":0.34251329606634595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958633578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71048886,0.025012318,0.0022731486,0.15362999,0.0021093497,0.00053643674,0.0010365398,0.00014880662,0.10476453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9076963,0.0048012016,0.0020858482,0.008130427,0.00017877645,0.000099630844,0.00018359236,0.00007563413,0.07674864],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876537,0.0023958315,0.00053378806,0.00096586184,0.0037284177,0.0047223642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92507064,0.01008426,0.0030028003,0.0009841686,0.026107525,0.03475059],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012598211,0.00033522514,0.00045175722,0.006195086,0.02869472,0.008536728,0.003547041,0.0034976187,0.005029359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040722504,0.0010185854,0.0004426145,0.005308853,0.013651859,0.0036156094,0.005391234,0.0063150288,0.0006049146],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036128607,0.0005601726,0.17871425,0.0005269782,0.00005224125,0.0037965053,0.32542992,0.001093269,0.0017467447,0.099551275,0.10451963,0.28364778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038855826,0.00019115095,0.25527567,0.0010497023,0.000034916975,0.0005823413,0.17507304,0.00042531965,0.00096187665,0.0038388097,0.56233513,0.00019318667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.985712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97130525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20157349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4002061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9260616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964160311","doi":"10.2202/1934-2640.1264","title":"Teaching Law and Economics from a Positive Perspective: The Political Economy of Policy Design in University Curricula","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Sheffield","keywords":"Normative; Curriculum; Politics; Perspective (graphical); Public policy; Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Economics; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.023782101812486165,"score_gpt":0.3364086476631673,"score_spread":0.3126265458506811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964160311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25876018,0.003655476,0.20507666,0.09907758,0.0005732279,0.00009416288,0.000023230898,0.00015515421,0.43258438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98413,0.00083232776,0.009506117,0.0013157118,0.000092339505,0.000069271235,0.000006842266,0.000043622047,0.004003799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850166,0.012100522,0.00015425398,0.00040394528,0.0018628003,0.00046184735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821786,0.014431899,0.000953265,0.0008924838,0.0007336395,0.0008100091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013608964,0.0003884616,0.00036219708,0.0016109247,0.0047345334,0.014611667,0.0010579318,0.0021633953,0.004518634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025134012,0.00048207183,0.00029426336,0.0013801628,0.025794119,0.009378992,0.0062965574,0.0049622757,0.0005033457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007935545,0.000079953854,0.0012873814,0.000046117475,0.0000033942506,0.0000322886,0.0047257002,0.0010932463,0.0001856021,0.9668009,0.0009816216,0.024755783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025330286,0.0000749601,0.0014028887,0.00025355193,0.000011232981,0.00007637866,0.008089748,0.0036640943,0.001076664,0.9361574,0.049153358,0.000014433189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001261551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022997612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014611667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074224053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069847126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07197195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965225627","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.2.93","title":"A Different Kind of Profession","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Management; Political science; Law; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.10493787927397605,"score_gpt":0.3799694554561572,"score_spread":0.2750315761821811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965225627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026939774,0.008364174,0.019580841,0.36556703,0.01831455,0.00013245326,0.000106158324,0.00040496906,0.5605901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64502215,0.008031189,0.01497063,0.12736617,0.020199891,0.00030801582,0.00012640245,0.0006591716,0.18331636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97171664,0.011262106,0.001338543,0.0042076586,0.0087941745,0.002680986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9353301,0.021444302,0.0047623008,0.0111263115,0.012114959,0.015222077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01828403,0.0005291702,0.0007724035,0.003436224,0.01241161,0.024535786,0.001734994,0.007851263,0.0136545235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03825858,0.00049241114,0.00091622246,0.0025977101,0.04111238,0.020843472,0.008559512,0.00956954,0.004857429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007043146,0.00010769894,0.0023151725,0.00031493983,0.000015596535,0.00018560252,0.038662013,0.00008653407,0.0007491822,0.85878366,0.057555795,0.041153353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003167641,0.00007050852,0.0020645284,0.00043261022,0.00001039606,0.00065796805,0.01647293,0.00019818988,0.00023788639,0.14573991,0.83400226,0.00008107791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044955323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004476756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024535786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070601273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014564808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09669638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965340325","doi":"10.1007/s10979-009-9214-8","title":"Twenty-five years of Social Science in Law.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Sociology; Social science; History","score_opus":0.03453078653814621,"score_gpt":0.40324271784971416,"score_spread":0.36871193131156793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965340325","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062497626,0.37547234,0.0090477485,0.2267705,0.021040715,0.000059868256,0.00018955642,0.00010300835,0.36106652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28402367,0.33291778,0.008660311,0.08625463,0.01628649,0.00035295068,0.00031014998,0.00015093449,0.27104303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674207,0.001702079,0.00015566697,0.0002578354,0.000911012,0.0002313418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99501204,0.002837695,0.00027492343,0.0003696676,0.00072635146,0.00077927473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004252585,0.0006482506,0.00045449936,0.0023385866,0.004352454,0.006575653,0.0008700412,0.0025487428,0.0069041126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072751446,0.00027838163,0.00046776078,0.0022503617,0.017516868,0.0055386354,0.0035903684,0.0052386625,0.001822188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013851137,0.00003828991,0.00071048946,0.00021568238,0.00001279746,0.00013244727,0.008681848,0.00015867123,0.000066364715,0.780453,0.14340322,0.06611321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031150703,0.000013200036,0.00054537546,0.000557673,0.0000029636406,0.00008654587,0.0020636835,0.000050862556,0.000035574594,0.12623745,0.8703954,0.000008187215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051722266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009146102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069041126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005753734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006694715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041746497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965397099","doi":"10.5539/gjhs.v4n5p125","title":"Action Research on Group Consulting of Family Legal Education for Adolescent Parents in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Health Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Action (physics); Legal action; China; Psychology; Cognition; Medical education; Action research; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.2733284736204595,"score_gpt":0.5846829834982754,"score_spread":0.31135450987781593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965397099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969566,0.00005549919,0.00077230996,0.00023419909,0.000008058402,0.00020905763,0.000007287968,0.0000075991447,0.00174932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947878,0.000107354565,0.004084436,0.00007897687,0.0000039007873,0.00022702612,0.000011791395,0.0000020379816,0.0006966355],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99252665,0.0057110647,0.000201895,0.00044729613,0.00063011644,0.00048292757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99340266,0.0035949913,0.00095160084,0.0006501802,0.0005262446,0.00087428803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00882651,0.00033140817,0.0002677122,0.00063049304,0.0022811084,0.0006956855,0.0009989648,0.00062698906,0.0021535063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011929515,0.00022739888,0.00029648916,0.0004014175,0.0015681104,0.0009712785,0.001207015,0.0007115985,0.00006550355],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093716546,0.024708334,0.28110203,0.0015501347,0.00013618582,0.0015089324,0.25529897,0.003066129,0.017148837,0.012173629,0.0028562872,0.3995133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015730995,0.016697366,0.66383505,0.001056534,0.00042782995,0.00079953094,0.22187567,0.017669253,0.03142244,0.009270694,0.03515599,0.00021656095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012631043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018279096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012631043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025618966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006340745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046679616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965587178","doi":"10.1017/s1472669607001661","title":"MOSSMAN, M. <i>The First Women Lawyers: a Comparative Study of Gender, Law and the Legal Professions</i> . Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2006. ISBN-13: 978-1-84113-590-8 (pbk.): £25.00. xi, 329 p.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05012152828082051,"score_gpt":0.34933175715525994,"score_spread":0.29921022887443943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965587178","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0080943825,0.8479351,0.0010118161,0.071974665,0.0031109753,0.00007781763,0.00060765934,0.00009147515,0.06709612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10969961,0.7502086,0.0029813598,0.010403691,0.0013767635,0.00021602966,0.00043692574,0.00014138252,0.12453553],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918956,0.000269256,0.000051111627,0.000059698472,0.00035484915,0.00007553103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997549,0.0013771917,0.00033995297,0.000050092785,0.00037782843,0.00030596575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014809495,0.0005536088,0.00039253544,0.0031040807,0.0025853468,0.0023553718,0.0009021298,0.0015711848,0.027635634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003938734,0.00085883227,0.00023612073,0.004747824,0.001824612,0.009893705,0.0011529543,0.0020143604,0.0050605936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041677544,0.00004075454,0.0014160597,0.0010188889,0.000011288875,0.00018072728,0.016909698,0.000046437188,0.00030002222,0.011115771,0.7553634,0.21355526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001710032,0.00006872239,0.017889714,0.0041930843,0.000025357833,0.0007084632,0.027988547,0.000039120703,0.00037996707,0.007812797,0.940848,0.000029139628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031539198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08547217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031539198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026781694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037287113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09245038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965994057","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2486","title":"Residential schools litigation and the legal profession","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Adversarial system; Legitimacy; Legal profession; Context (archaeology); Equity (law); Law; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.011547366703732291,"score_gpt":0.29239031262039017,"score_spread":0.28084294591665787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965994057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29642862,0.006342387,0.0071907295,0.19810936,0.0008264431,0.000076070326,0.000051347815,0.00011875543,0.49085626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710084,0.0010529445,0.00053306436,0.006772401,0.0001963819,0.000014094919,0.00000944574,0.000022478058,0.020390602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842121,0.00699487,0.00030620137,0.0010568538,0.0031031126,0.0043268814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886114,0.00488316,0.0013540577,0.0006621217,0.001957106,0.0025320502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0093132155,0.00025139426,0.00029581098,0.0015460072,0.046924673,0.01131297,0.0018650983,0.006800388,0.011214442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018129423,0.000304762,0.00046571292,0.0017260194,0.053954344,0.0049123093,0.013170692,0.008657411,0.00089395355],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013187233,0.000054957072,0.0037169068,0.000039279497,0.0000062230565,0.0007584073,0.07436476,0.00031177435,0.0001268882,0.8906611,0.013531998,0.016414393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038261573,0.00010809874,0.012086323,0.0005710924,0.00003216627,0.0012015739,0.27021405,0.0010663216,0.000970565,0.22176473,0.49183598,0.00011077469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41492695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58775944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58507305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04475614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06252655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8250236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966854331","doi":"10.1111/j.1939-3938.2012.01139.x","title":"Writing for publication: What about case reports?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Forensic Nursing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic nursing; Audience measurement; Publishing; Perspective (graphical); Subject (documents); Editorial board; Psychology; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Forensic science; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Library science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.04588685543750574,"score_gpt":0.42846867816073025,"score_spread":0.3825818227232245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966854331","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002243986,0.2561953,0.006023517,0.6703456,0.054434787,0.0003907185,0.0001489793,0.00036840045,0.009848696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06544321,0.36139706,0.0205154,0.39034626,0.15566629,0.0015022029,0.00045838024,0.00064788054,0.0040233405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7992433,0.118936546,0.037695434,0.008428907,0.030431617,0.0052641877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4902763,0.31869677,0.09301095,0.022268245,0.05672922,0.019018397],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06474389,0.0028659403,0.0043715457,0.012656593,0.008976028,0.027868507,0.008058587,0.025612546,0.006458944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5264195,0.0017008245,0.0025782774,0.0110884365,0.022730315,0.054759044,0.008266417,0.022845453,0.008949388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023807763,0.00024642315,0.008101201,0.01778246,0.00023374704,0.025549348,0.042055886,0.00020169845,0.0004401518,0.039604224,0.5077351,0.3578117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008193505,0.00019269703,0.0018516008,0.054576118,0.00020975451,0.100365214,0.038789842,0.00026196998,0.00047264856,0.07893293,0.72391695,0.00034834255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032134939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024500312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9352561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007148472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01343733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34240252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968222146","doi":"10.1111/medu.12706","title":"The birth of scenario‐oriented learning in ethics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.06981638957248594,"score_gpt":0.46315428656027535,"score_spread":0.3933378969877894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968222146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036513474,0.014486003,0.23047228,0.14940332,0.0021894863,0.00012979515,0.0001614509,0.00030545105,0.5663387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88456476,0.0077115432,0.08184386,0.005524494,0.0010418817,0.000235791,0.00008638792,0.00021061617,0.018780809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938958,0.0048938734,0.0000983564,0.00034810105,0.00058234384,0.00018150668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96130764,0.033860978,0.000529575,0.0021155463,0.0010636103,0.001122712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011590537,0.0005306504,0.00040797328,0.0013953049,0.0022221273,0.007924068,0.0014410766,0.0040883804,0.016501226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02980706,0.00042387162,0.00041793205,0.00072633004,0.028130334,0.012585552,0.005029225,0.00701516,0.0013358747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009844729,0.000016985883,0.00012264325,0.0000450132,0.0000028683478,0.000027611331,0.0018958767,0.00045408058,0.000048737154,0.98195136,0.0020312,0.0133937625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008242544,0.000012867804,0.000079389916,0.00016702602,0.0000014303532,0.000059040914,0.00061426486,0.0010585141,0.00013222136,0.95562017,0.042239103,0.000007779458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011670097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009211005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016501226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029189012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033007385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061297357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969138315","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.1","title":"The Past, Present … and Future(?) of Judicial Ethics Education in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.046199851929390266,"score_gpt":0.3933745093764602,"score_spread":0.34717465744706993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969138315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120151974,0.039467823,0.0007745965,0.7742913,0.0017494699,0.000076945114,0.00079589075,0.000073829564,0.06261815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91789716,0.023229871,0.0021110584,0.030712064,0.00032247946,0.000054978285,0.00031521235,0.000035920206,0.025321174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917498,0.00085990137,0.00022224362,0.0003813079,0.0033957597,0.0033908682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96836066,0.0024149383,0.0012473098,0.00013464139,0.010039961,0.017802471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005795151,0.00022486872,0.00041438843,0.0016367619,0.017727695,0.008701791,0.0017925448,0.0034896305,0.008852085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01487848,0.0004558077,0.00040692577,0.002704765,0.005339413,0.0029629641,0.003649824,0.0063589383,0.00038737216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021648142,0.00025475264,0.057734907,0.0011226187,0.000054518383,0.00079564063,0.03021072,0.0011337587,0.0010038109,0.19079877,0.43875328,0.2779208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015186312,0.00014508427,0.24808098,0.0032480003,0.00009214074,0.00038413727,0.065557554,0.0024160808,0.00096941384,0.018293725,0.66038257,0.00027833728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76010287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23989713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.55656356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8816116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970439025","doi":"","title":"Courthouse Cancellations and Challenges to Self-Regulation: Correspondent’s Report from Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual misconduct; Law; Economic Justice; Misconduct; Political science; Queen (butterfly); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04677938013459182,"score_gpt":0.3035218410460404,"score_spread":0.2567424609114486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970439025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47426158,0.005925878,0.00077125774,0.2892225,0.0030194982,0.00039771452,0.0029282758,0.0002365621,0.2232368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7821069,0.0057615917,0.0006547263,0.07198273,0.00045205312,0.00009924079,0.0008863762,0.0001806288,0.13787572],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98881966,0.00078957115,0.0002669497,0.00066538475,0.005903712,0.003554702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788208,0.002574681,0.0009206242,0.00046956423,0.009851358,0.007362957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045515224,0.00042272202,0.00059375487,0.0021520373,0.052352533,0.008767692,0.0031144354,0.0064248806,0.010383306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016469397,0.00081722037,0.000580675,0.0045486395,0.0049809343,0.0016072248,0.003975135,0.008998163,0.0007047276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013576091,0.00026132437,0.054826494,0.00027817386,0.00008525455,0.004715263,0.12199554,0.0005222778,0.0008627403,0.028032547,0.7340493,0.054235328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003517327,0.000064687985,0.09901171,0.00028147982,0.000065231725,0.00061276444,0.18968704,0.00036838654,0.0005617961,0.00093543524,0.70815814,0.00021821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12140627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12140627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29053843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88086826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970607549","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2005.tb02186.x","title":"Debating a whistle‐blower protection act for employees of the Government of Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Parliament; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Whistle blowing; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Public relations","score_opus":0.04215467431672612,"score_gpt":0.3064511432499956,"score_spread":0.2642964689332695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970607549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7880463,0.0013222499,0.0019249056,0.086559266,0.00035120052,0.00042360686,0.00023227195,0.0001174826,0.12102275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9098972,0.00043748048,0.001110657,0.012166946,0.0000454304,0.00005537953,0.00007060139,0.000017842522,0.07619852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98878664,0.0008041963,0.00022671524,0.00053381204,0.0047057495,0.004942911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823642,0.0047504837,0.00084472727,0.00054429926,0.008116318,0.0033800567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007908058,0.00024404521,0.00022709231,0.0008876523,0.02508707,0.0061847223,0.0021257852,0.0066720597,0.003901677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020582935,0.00041241464,0.0002997952,0.0007674236,0.0051230122,0.0008950858,0.0028440226,0.0046365904,0.00041891666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043663132,0.0005146072,0.1601325,0.00043781617,0.00014263719,0.006006914,0.18826927,0.008705453,0.015653193,0.26011592,0.19498223,0.16460295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007551322,0.00036635928,0.1354265,0.0005470437,0.00013885974,0.00035472948,0.14396895,0.0056155697,0.0072655347,0.00855761,0.69724333,0.00043987474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9869833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87868786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12131215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29169723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88018537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970966901","doi":"10.1089/glr.2008.12107","title":"Cameron's Rejection of a Duty of Care to Problem Gamblers: A Problematic Defense of Ontario's Gaming Industry","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Duty of care; Download; Law; Psychology; Business; Operations research; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06617364883818559,"score_gpt":0.3644845396834606,"score_spread":0.298310890845275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970966901","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065233335,0.0031152305,0.0011912307,0.7902055,0.0014714696,0.00013878391,0.00030595146,0.000035078992,0.13830349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5529097,0.0033352554,0.0014036226,0.34273645,0.0008411385,0.00019059167,0.00009145954,0.00008612543,0.0984058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853639,0.0021619308,0.0006243458,0.0013764458,0.0051833442,0.005289979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682256,0.018700743,0.0013558606,0.00071145775,0.0068661785,0.004140141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012022123,0.0004526292,0.00086486404,0.0023625202,0.029517258,0.011009084,0.0045277034,0.029125769,0.007341704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041801985,0.0012732325,0.0011402484,0.002634999,0.021243058,0.004159456,0.003979621,0.025614446,0.00053897646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000822918,0.00006734317,0.011287898,0.00019041997,0.00004752371,0.00097631104,0.032400712,0.00029981378,0.0004924853,0.63697255,0.30094606,0.016236586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002782853,0.00007855807,0.046390682,0.0014463607,0.00025307134,0.0005824708,0.046642706,0.001296753,0.0010506695,0.065299705,0.8363327,0.0003480773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96306974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98584634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058560878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058560878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15438312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42489088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971506959","doi":"10.3138/jvme.33.1.125","title":"Toward a Practice-Based Approach to Legal Education in the Veterinary Medical Curriculum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Veterinary Medical Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Veterinary education; Curriculum; Maltese; Veterinary medicine; State (computer science); Law; Medical education; Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.09089507058300111,"score_gpt":0.45576796987838514,"score_spread":0.364872899295384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971506959","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03057318,0.0028591785,0.048989147,0.81924856,0.002550085,0.0012927048,0.000031731328,0.000528435,0.093926914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5501402,0.0067896643,0.28637365,0.09589033,0.0025588626,0.004611693,0.0001944076,0.00022442022,0.053216785],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95835274,0.027851908,0.0014027756,0.0017315947,0.0075049056,0.0031559865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9168052,0.021646786,0.004101309,0.0028586593,0.0122594945,0.042328596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0687696,0.0005630946,0.0004952793,0.0042697364,0.013062766,0.020359812,0.004795128,0.010619826,0.010227086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050407223,0.0007958498,0.0005908999,0.0019792966,0.014280082,0.009519203,0.022180054,0.016182704,0.003022087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062948086,0.004318502,0.013351892,0.00092682027,0.000039341336,0.0008715069,0.098099194,0.0020269714,0.0013705918,0.23817118,0.24997196,0.39078915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025409815,0.00086676015,0.020003902,0.0051495153,0.00002697659,0.0009235333,0.14655605,0.0035632898,0.001221462,0.2254083,0.5958469,0.00017919329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012287712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02704602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0687696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015318404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10401474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36369276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972015922","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2012.694998","title":"International practice of Public Legal Education: a missing element in the justice system of Bangladesh","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Empowerment; Transformative learning; Relevance (law); Economic Justice; Element (criminal law); Public relations; Subject (documents); Political science; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Sociology; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.06442253769063168,"score_gpt":0.4049741958835994,"score_spread":0.34055165819296773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972015922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26168844,0.008490079,0.0059905117,0.123499244,0.00031141692,0.0003065089,0.00011194972,0.00007116194,0.59953076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97057277,0.0031290527,0.0017752949,0.0023207143,0.000043872136,0.0000811096,0.00002964865,0.000015836911,0.022031728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99373406,0.0035993368,0.00039272476,0.00046977503,0.0009614635,0.00084264704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99395,0.0026680152,0.0008937298,0.0006043298,0.00064009405,0.0012438226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051764264,0.00021890082,0.0002530169,0.0011031296,0.0074394164,0.008294504,0.00092239724,0.0021893303,0.0073512313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009255229,0.00023550828,0.00010518957,0.0030499455,0.014385168,0.0037825815,0.006080665,0.003077597,0.0006357263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021604532,0.00013891248,0.011428636,0.0004113714,0.00000821325,0.0013950933,0.17122686,0.00025053276,0.001275514,0.6765989,0.009899828,0.12734449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019565725,0.00016173406,0.024265729,0.0012774108,0.0000141696955,0.0013439584,0.26874045,0.00043832712,0.0006989051,0.056798544,0.6461616,0.000079640675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019265879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037006557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019265879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011298701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020464625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0819782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973016859","doi":"10.2307/3504568","title":"10.2307/3504568","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Morality; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.019616187019506064,"score_gpt":0.30347039371434975,"score_spread":0.2838542066948437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973016859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030590149,0.0002825955,0.00031573523,0.00030843067,0.0003467247,0.000040414496,0.0006405568,0.0004676085,0.997292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001051345,0.00029748166,0.000397834,0.00034465722,0.00008415073,0.000025398587,0.0008734397,0.00028147435,0.99664426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944216,0.000045192184,0.000044016084,0.00013068413,0.00025274805,0.00008526712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981073,0.0003908472,0.00007413837,0.00033163893,0.00046251496,0.0006335367],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078584754,0.0014242104,0.00097655505,0.0022661176,0.0016736652,0.0046411715,0.001585722,0.0024240944,0.9834056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022037453,0.00066974066,0.00069538126,0.002428593,0.0017442004,0.0050185346,0.004075869,0.001614418,0.98303866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000156442,0.00017341007,0.00053624425,0.00035842403,0.000013031903,0.00020355293,0.00009690849,0.00012980979,0.0015693953,0.00702753,0.5683955,0.42133975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021854592,0.00003174398,0.00082740287,0.00015502631,0.0000048106385,0.00021938613,0.00012654181,0.00010017787,0.00020960618,0.0012056438,0.99708575,0.000012017074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004200594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046752696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01659441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010655326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001335397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023669839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973468005","doi":"10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00774.x","title":"New Problem-Solving Scholarship: An Historical Tale with a Happy Ending","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Adversarial system; Scholarship; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Philosophy of law; Negotiation theory; Quarter (Canadian coin); Epistemology; Psychology; Public relations; Social science; Law; Political science; Comparative law; History","score_opus":0.05375713648181519,"score_gpt":0.35540562041145257,"score_spread":0.3016484839296374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973468005","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019663742,0.2803586,0.015698673,0.33987382,0.0092238095,0.00004883556,0.00004693376,0.000077866316,0.3350077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7472019,0.16991615,0.009568986,0.022366503,0.01228842,0.0001952153,0.00006828088,0.0002029525,0.038191587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450463,0.003893232,0.00016274097,0.00036676743,0.0007783494,0.00029424828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99277616,0.0051307315,0.00032513213,0.0004212338,0.0006937799,0.0006530033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064747958,0.0005279988,0.00044236984,0.0036750312,0.009171862,0.014264203,0.0012793166,0.0037647323,0.003349207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076977634,0.00028505555,0.00023615808,0.0032244406,0.046651017,0.014520846,0.0058356742,0.008838452,0.0005201636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008027793,0.000024112696,0.00008930487,0.00008805425,0.0000017604242,0.000070478745,0.009550937,0.000059881822,0.00003904493,0.9733854,0.008431414,0.008251616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000104053715,0.00003276465,0.0002821773,0.000902332,0.000002875522,0.00029390733,0.016309632,0.00033840208,0.00016060792,0.3318448,0.64980835,0.000013681805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018381265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019577155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014264203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065488038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030996616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047515154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W197470741","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200000213","title":"Book Review - Jean McKenzie Leiper's <i>Bar Codes: Women in the Legal Profession</i> - [Jean McKenzie Leiper, Bar Codes: Women in the Legal Profession, UBC Press, Toronto, 2006, ISBN 978–0-7748-1320-4, pp. 242, $29.99]","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Bar (unit); Law; Political science; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.028694112820108496,"score_gpt":0.34755778768745355,"score_spread":0.31886367486734507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W197470741","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003791817,0.50896496,0.0009279265,0.067249104,0.041904736,0.00012069605,0.0013623866,0.0002591999,0.37883174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025012104,0.28452447,0.0006364118,0.0172442,0.012241266,0.00008523813,0.0012068016,0.00018435628,0.681376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991622,0.000070789596,0.00003261174,0.000071695125,0.0006175259,0.000045081866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974138,0.00080483785,0.0001650207,0.00006297421,0.001328132,0.00022529384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059080665,0.0008423224,0.000938163,0.0028602825,0.0008923231,0.0025974063,0.0010383764,0.0018332187,0.11450749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00396851,0.00028963297,0.00035381754,0.005316634,0.00078872574,0.0031006814,0.0010484738,0.0020542147,0.07403812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017968365,0.0000027205706,0.000010086537,0.0001706425,8.177239e-7,0.000009882291,0.000027371938,0.000013129818,0.00002822571,0.0007498806,0.97432464,0.024660675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.733891e-7,0.0000032911682,0.00009985434,0.0002932792,0.0000013317854,0.000054647924,0.000031871197,0.000006324599,0.000016651582,0.0002845253,0.9992047,0.0000026091657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011427342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026891692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11450749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025581806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004102956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38306576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975677011","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342017","title":"Resurgence of the Traditional Justice System in Postcolonial Benin (Nigeria) Society","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sanctions; Harmonization; Political science; Human rights; Sociology; Social justice; Law; Relevance (law); Environmental ethics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.08622558257745999,"score_gpt":0.3601678112332124,"score_spread":0.2739422286557524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975677011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9669269,0.0013806926,0.00028059087,0.009029227,0.000081638915,0.000029207025,0.000009239999,0.0000042461475,0.022258295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997156,0.00034521587,0.00011299601,0.00035121044,0.000012468793,0.000008040261,0.0000028414208,0.0000013921627,0.002009803],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998691,0.000575267,0.000057548317,0.00009806342,0.0001320174,0.00044616367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985348,0.00037956145,0.00045830593,0.000070852635,0.00023676202,0.00031968497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020498645,0.00021431645,0.00017873902,0.000993097,0.010831081,0.003620464,0.00045617195,0.0011552668,0.0033086403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018408807,0.00018005204,0.00006642634,0.0008203134,0.00895846,0.0020269954,0.0033566917,0.0012861872,0.00016456428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118900345,0.00020160619,0.0659427,0.0003513235,0.000011332071,0.008376379,0.60321784,0.0001788675,0.0048309406,0.25879365,0.004013616,0.053962804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023562416,0.00016959698,0.13105407,0.0007802573,0.000015252522,0.002845639,0.6802425,0.00048161598,0.0016533374,0.021854924,0.16082227,0.000056994108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011864122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03134001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011864122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004957096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004375485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035966396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979517367","doi":"10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.019","title":"Ethical matters or the matter of ethics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching and Teacher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering ethics","score_opus":0.06264461585091227,"score_gpt":0.45137447738927383,"score_spread":0.38872986153836153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979517367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009577977,0.048050392,0.028023215,0.43082026,0.00674314,0.00010112327,0.00007994308,0.000049316786,0.47655463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7710871,0.022498839,0.014414377,0.11191892,0.020394104,0.00041856454,0.000092352,0.00016132224,0.05901436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9618538,0.028449802,0.0010829831,0.0022433402,0.00440354,0.0019664478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94032717,0.048255134,0.0033426357,0.0032918015,0.0031860173,0.001597301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023448,0.00088682637,0.0015413088,0.0018603775,0.0059895376,0.010157635,0.0018975675,0.018432196,0.007597801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04354658,0.0004976478,0.00085321395,0.0016423246,0.09505825,0.015478434,0.0038745685,0.014133259,0.0012979932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004940122,0.000007712407,0.000040194114,0.000028322955,0.0000026958958,0.000019877501,0.0006004674,0.000035426692,0.000014108224,0.9945391,0.0034340757,0.0012731196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071979202,0.000006199116,0.000060508122,0.00008332675,0.0000024127216,0.00004327344,0.0005938809,0.000096144126,0.00003222791,0.96932787,0.029741935,0.0000051049856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002802827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019279153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046301796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008140052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12400639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984920196","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0015","title":"Defining Moments for Women as Lawyers: Reflections on Numerical Gender Equality","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender equality; Sociology; Mathematics; Gender studies; Calculus (dental); Medicine","score_opus":0.11300095921226927,"score_gpt":0.4067852068891015,"score_spread":0.29378424767683226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984920196","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09413182,0.016888754,0.004337269,0.5448291,0.006540692,0.00008816643,0.00008176371,0.00006915202,0.33303326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8527471,0.004864856,0.00095184473,0.06960289,0.0016240386,0.00011474679,0.00002450656,0.0001232597,0.06994675],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855409,0.008787121,0.00018538516,0.00066370494,0.0016994895,0.0031233248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99112284,0.005270687,0.0006795752,0.00017778232,0.00092646107,0.0018226502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009321851,0.0005831695,0.0006391963,0.0016591856,0.048803505,0.020646514,0.0031050916,0.008901585,0.0068073156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013458732,0.0005908126,0.0005468292,0.0014935952,0.06626887,0.012358349,0.011927614,0.01276683,0.00071269117],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015907754,0.000013752971,0.00034960965,0.000041284915,0.0000019774639,0.0004039268,0.7854349,0.000019690813,0.0001577235,0.19480509,0.015217423,0.0035386777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005038988,0.000011843797,0.00050502317,0.00016253501,0.0000027516612,0.00011211007,0.7431369,0.000024944482,0.00011104271,0.011200076,0.24471207,0.000015757423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25571266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43519405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96061075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03938928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024716785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5084485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986239576","doi":"10.1017/s1472669610000137","title":"Neteracy in Nova Scotia – Themes from the 2009 CALL/ACBD Conference","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Library science; The Internet; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Psychology; World Wide Web; Engineering; Computer science; Ethnology; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.028279893096006613,"score_gpt":0.34036274479015355,"score_spread":0.31208285169414696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986239576","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18640728,0.027994318,0.00033212538,0.42064244,0.008498883,0.00019420555,0.00092431117,0.00006719333,0.35493928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37837908,0.01478008,0.0007521954,0.043969423,0.0012188407,0.0000987705,0.00083183177,0.00006821592,0.55990165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865985,0.00013074846,0.00002787533,0.00007892314,0.00037375223,0.00072894135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667835,0.00031745492,0.00011234834,0.000039112303,0.00063296524,0.0022197685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012896016,0.00017283933,0.00021281754,0.0006547977,0.008650914,0.004544276,0.0009762829,0.0021822897,0.017468123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020822037,0.0002372495,0.0001661593,0.0010485926,0.0017896241,0.0008441476,0.0034891611,0.0029613094,0.0010649404],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023287893,0.00020910696,0.014377519,0.000943947,0.000018340717,0.0063540274,0.018966816,0.00036496215,0.003119934,0.027257195,0.8480048,0.080150396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020388406,0.000021487263,0.059097305,0.00039312054,0.000003797527,0.00021983829,0.014578825,0.00009129575,0.00019318226,0.00036289514,0.92500114,0.000016677868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9045757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97520995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095424294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039921492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07098546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28965205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986878677","doi":"10.1353/utq.2010.0061","title":"Law, Mystery, and the Humanities: Collected Essays (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Postmodernism; Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.015928102347547615,"score_gpt":0.2703701816500301,"score_spread":0.25444207930248247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986878677","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000066671164,0.99428856,0.00002880186,0.002391491,0.0010719242,0.000016201277,0.00012786813,0.0000067533306,0.0020017333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009901226,0.9939691,0.00009177292,0.0018318832,0.0009675739,0.000045577744,0.00023387393,0.000012202117,0.0018578587],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977463,0.0005766249,0.00032575172,0.00018844489,0.0010108479,0.00015196844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98837656,0.0050015063,0.0014248162,0.00029260255,0.004370449,0.0005339911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00299619,0.0012032533,0.002092679,0.012012159,0.00088512443,0.003909411,0.0013572423,0.0017078496,0.02104236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0139315715,0.0008512297,0.0007686679,0.024253923,0.0019731084,0.003921076,0.0026341043,0.0023049915,0.0075024636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004119691,0.000037253423,0.0003870632,0.045227125,0.00015736971,0.00009224875,0.00076666736,0.00009128043,0.00021995511,0.0018835445,0.63287663,0.31821972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016439195,0.000021107238,0.0021119805,0.06261283,0.000116761126,0.0001630059,0.00093484734,0.000012092971,0.00005036826,0.00055624143,0.93338114,0.000023191584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0100703975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026624786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02104236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002487352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008942927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07039368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988556958","doi":"10.7202/1027999ar","title":"De la nécessité d’enseigner le droit civil et la common law dans les Facultés de droit au Canada","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02150915692891705,"score_gpt":0.31365031594694465,"score_spread":0.2921411590180276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988556958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53720415,0.016345909,0.003541865,0.21522653,0.00053657044,0.00014690748,0.0015740736,0.00007103304,0.22535291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440062,0.0065490617,0.0014768513,0.0055816397,0.00014747056,0.00005441326,0.00038938693,0.000028322855,0.041766625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909123,0.0014346412,0.0002942709,0.00063428085,0.0037854435,0.00293906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717794,0.008888489,0.0032821943,0.000484065,0.008176529,0.00738915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055124178,0.00018444148,0.00035892578,0.0017061668,0.007792332,0.0054880404,0.001221556,0.0034215592,0.019871466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028601248,0.0002565161,0.00043585175,0.0028476936,0.00732961,0.0030620336,0.0045319153,0.0039797006,0.00089316047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026931573,0.00025052787,0.20672904,0.0014707822,0.00009701332,0.0020814172,0.075090624,0.0033374357,0.0026368352,0.42667413,0.0994248,0.18193813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045286968,0.00011658535,0.5326013,0.0018421026,0.00008672923,0.0009847552,0.07847672,0.0019098455,0.0011694737,0.024997111,0.3575933,0.00017674683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9186424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9729264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9460251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053974926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13211587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39161736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988648967","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2012.681177","title":"Teaching without authority","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Constructive; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Function (biology); Legal profession; Demographics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Pedagogy; Process (computing); Computer science","score_opus":0.09048175909408541,"score_gpt":0.42972872178170785,"score_spread":0.33924696268762244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988648967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013536882,0.0043567284,0.0076616034,0.11267295,0.003999587,0.000064835804,0.00007971754,0.00022636114,0.8574013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54450935,0.0051156525,0.004452394,0.028493721,0.0019741687,0.00013890216,0.00010415522,0.00022443513,0.41498718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925748,0.0034761697,0.00021506083,0.0008413879,0.002034545,0.0008578831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903791,0.0031704789,0.00094545656,0.0013687519,0.0013821828,0.0027540883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039059361,0.00035460028,0.00043364865,0.0009608105,0.0070261364,0.0076344283,0.0013353843,0.002487876,0.047754213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0143958535,0.00022294333,0.0004933891,0.0006620393,0.01076567,0.009141207,0.007795294,0.006323095,0.010639328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022972663,0.00012658363,0.0013802608,0.00017188453,0.000005367078,0.00030327807,0.030710658,0.00023232611,0.0005029527,0.7370882,0.15044418,0.07901126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010522502,0.00004510825,0.00057236315,0.0004072922,0.000004456043,0.00022875637,0.01037705,0.00021238257,0.0003293259,0.0816934,0.90610784,0.000011428986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004581856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006883901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047754213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057379617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007862972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15975368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988796429","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.01.014","title":"Inter-disciplinary teaching strategies for mental health law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Discipline; Mental health; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Law; Psychiatry; Medicine; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.08647829579388691,"score_gpt":0.4776675216194935,"score_spread":0.39118922582560656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988796429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6352325,0.002600851,0.06932953,0.03897815,0.0015614842,0.0012582226,0.00009196609,0.00058037014,0.25036693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91074437,0.0019231404,0.05177324,0.003347231,0.00024986148,0.00075633824,0.000079137244,0.00009698631,0.031029634],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974062,0.001496665,0.00007837918,0.00023278817,0.0003485016,0.00043746963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98887724,0.005034042,0.00046981827,0.00068299635,0.0010049887,0.0039309743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049695186,0.0005204138,0.00029513182,0.0012394636,0.006035945,0.0045570545,0.0025050594,0.0020562988,0.019851105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013219319,0.00034086403,0.0004618825,0.00071191083,0.0017906484,0.0037940303,0.011046522,0.004029528,0.0024379522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021298465,0.0129729,0.013205098,0.00055154396,0.000028637078,0.0022372794,0.17920953,0.0011996246,0.0029225212,0.11277354,0.043460142,0.6312262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044930214,0.0014589342,0.029578753,0.0027946539,0.00012785233,0.004340097,0.4307076,0.006823253,0.0089530675,0.18010737,0.3345204,0.00013869771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014258872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074128276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019851105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030049856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010939624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066408634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989278777","doi":"","title":"Globalization and Legal Education: Views from the Outside-In","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Legal education; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Field (mathematics); Legal profession; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.032283077174279445,"score_gpt":0.35999713897604046,"score_spread":0.327714061801761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989278777","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08110646,0.06435246,0.0018656977,0.58530754,0.0023163902,0.000016047996,0.000027331147,0.00002694753,0.2649812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90189785,0.025080541,0.00040921895,0.0569517,0.0019689423,0.000032616754,0.000016598491,0.000046825546,0.013595651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467987,0.003816018,0.00008837858,0.00038336415,0.00047706277,0.0005553879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947796,0.0033775615,0.0004044527,0.00020107845,0.0003739652,0.0008633249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059602465,0.00047365628,0.00052305876,0.0017114573,0.014250672,0.01654478,0.0009781594,0.008236347,0.0039891205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004047022,0.00022821316,0.00039119044,0.0019540398,0.060741268,0.016200462,0.008884101,0.010246585,0.00030462173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020394711,0.00007935106,0.001424174,0.00014815021,0.0000064645574,0.00042152358,0.25675836,0.00013657442,0.00015174986,0.7048013,0.018979624,0.017072415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020164745,0.00006149751,0.0022399847,0.0016746675,0.000012202039,0.0005683485,0.3365214,0.00022270605,0.00020608684,0.15492165,0.5035208,0.00003055219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053409804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067284745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01654478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00617239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056750076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04478401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990719429","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0013","title":"Frank Iacobucci and the University of Toronto","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Friendship; Character (mathematics); Media studies; Sociology; Law; Political science; Art; Social science; Literature","score_opus":0.01291416203427385,"score_gpt":0.27374297899915906,"score_spread":0.2608288169648852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990719429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006079486,0.15716489,0.00068941695,0.32487968,0.01398657,0.00003340914,0.0008754293,0.00020567223,0.4960854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.105855085,0.061156273,0.0006963198,0.014619149,0.0019584836,0.000042682343,0.00036462437,0.00014208588,0.81516534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812,0.0002522154,0.00005502372,0.00031833036,0.0007410273,0.0005133563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572927,0.0004546343,0.00024896394,0.00017047698,0.0014095268,0.0019871062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091244065,0.0005135008,0.0004428639,0.0010301685,0.010826049,0.005616235,0.0005885709,0.0027135413,0.045462206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004008945,0.0003975495,0.00017686213,0.0016297905,0.0040947846,0.0016450164,0.0020512482,0.0025876914,0.007595784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002135667,0.0000059500267,0.00049908005,0.00008257702,0.0000023886591,0.00012878871,0.0017606614,0.000054147484,0.000057983394,0.058305465,0.9210553,0.018026425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022122094,0.0000030797612,0.00084273267,0.00013369219,0.0000018523479,0.000043160875,0.0008868257,0.000023478582,0.000044768592,0.0013366708,0.99667066,0.000010858773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7343702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88139147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0480847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051405028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5343883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993481130","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.109-4866","title":"US politics and ideology enter exam rooms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Cover (algebra); Politics; Ideology; Abortion; Bit (key); Law; Computer science; Medicine; Computer security; Political science; Surgery; Pregnancy; Engineering","score_opus":0.012073782299209452,"score_gpt":0.3116911707774581,"score_spread":0.29961738847824865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993481130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046270378,0.0031151602,0.0004080369,0.20457491,0.0016716027,0.000008272896,0.00010118185,0.000042727126,0.74380773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7970348,0.0017305539,0.00018851484,0.040671676,0.00077455037,0.000017672406,0.00004792149,0.00010574592,0.15942857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997586,0.0010784252,0.000031720887,0.00013850252,0.0003150597,0.00085033645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774677,0.00067950075,0.00018252838,0.00010624037,0.00023010968,0.0010547438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017955464,0.00020580264,0.00021422881,0.0006550701,0.01435614,0.008376519,0.00030965105,0.0031576995,0.053733937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040377746,0.0001934434,0.00022915052,0.0009365446,0.008308653,0.003511984,0.004186345,0.0048791138,0.0043951357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040083865,0.00006211793,0.0036680389,0.000022659482,0.0000067689593,0.00025959138,0.022524074,0.00005202993,0.0001920068,0.7455859,0.20949623,0.01809044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015016242,0.00001896541,0.0043736724,0.00016377972,0.000004056372,0.00006362199,0.032348577,0.00006187898,0.00014661909,0.04049134,0.9222968,0.000015726508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025293369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045072354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053733937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005615897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039172545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17975795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993751475","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0012","title":"If Philosophical Legal Ethics is the Answer, What is the Question?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Closed-ended question; Political science","score_opus":0.03466443420024338,"score_gpt":0.35657622478657486,"score_spread":0.32191179058633146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993751475","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009955519,0.0072674574,0.00351592,0.9777364,0.001714689,0.000007117046,0.000046357614,0.00002638331,0.008690197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22210781,0.0595228,0.024474321,0.6284615,0.038550448,0.00033007766,0.0003534369,0.00047187656,0.025727805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98933,0.0057706987,0.00036364896,0.00092173077,0.0024824971,0.0011314752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9476128,0.031468503,0.0034337444,0.0023876748,0.009506877,0.0055903764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026749719,0.0007819612,0.002011925,0.0023877295,0.0059494334,0.012613577,0.0030042857,0.016846027,0.020603484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068840764,0.0006323779,0.0011044745,0.0026155806,0.04584876,0.037210222,0.005714433,0.019093024,0.008057044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003767897,0.00012161981,0.0011751357,0.0005578472,0.000057213532,0.000103381615,0.0017172369,0.00028749384,0.00018500362,0.84981364,0.12207906,0.02386474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019570916,0.000011596026,0.0004361647,0.0005159849,0.000008175803,0.00008640514,0.004874498,0.00027665205,0.000061922576,0.91213655,0.08155357,0.000018835568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047897045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046508457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026749719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070583154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012819669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14146769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993893059","doi":"10.1353/jsh.2000.0051","title":"Portia Ante Portas: Women and the Legal Profession in Europe, ca. 1870-1925","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social History","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019796480622737037,"score_gpt":0.32848989568217096,"score_spread":0.30869341505943393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993893059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18647787,0.1428751,0.00038218373,0.033926982,0.0035024257,0.000040812865,0.0008744523,0.00005414938,0.631866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6355056,0.06331381,0.000430057,0.0042538005,0.0013509367,0.00005248566,0.00030341858,0.000054823926,0.2947351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967575,0.00007038487,0.000018020717,0.00005092722,0.00007299449,0.00011195664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998159,0.000054749966,0.0000498525,0.000006692141,0.000028885617,0.000044005126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005760583,0.0002721603,0.00019299702,0.001425706,0.0027152398,0.0026147298,0.00036068098,0.0014130815,0.0104654115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001398093,0.00023425373,0.00015040625,0.0023139722,0.002092417,0.0019390113,0.0015288303,0.0012750512,0.00082541595],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054059876,0.00018018874,0.02783997,0.0011881327,0.00005265927,0.0038193574,0.09332799,0.00041532022,0.001177071,0.3792092,0.1543634,0.33788618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004776552,0.000014074324,0.02939515,0.00035555818,0.00000598278,0.00026437687,0.0054430217,0.000016969349,0.00017228977,0.0013754104,0.9629438,0.000008482398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08209089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15079118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08209089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055786343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028533915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16322613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994935465","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2011.566452","title":"Selling out: academic freedom and the corporate market","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Academic freedom; Higher education; Sociology; Media studies; Management; Political science; Economic history; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.14653237265222377,"score_gpt":0.4174404470687324,"score_spread":0.27090807441650866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994935465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051198397,0.34680983,0.00060257287,0.256456,0.0025109237,0.000014601592,0.00016969048,0.00006870646,0.38824788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30528066,0.25228614,0.00061808154,0.026143968,0.0063508824,0.000042528623,0.0001785008,0.00015227412,0.40894705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923444,0.00023872673,0.000015018225,0.00007807571,0.00020913681,0.00022463955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989993,0.000441105,0.00012680571,0.000060396666,0.000101722886,0.00027071778],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013613098,0.0006769926,0.00046482033,0.0009539951,0.004471845,0.018746706,0.001003871,0.0049427906,0.030932048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022055274,0.00034697016,0.00030702274,0.0025811312,0.017619133,0.01277126,0.0033059602,0.004333487,0.004844359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027806482,0.000030270709,0.0003601023,0.0001388567,0.000008130718,0.00011423457,0.0038605626,0.00018366147,0.00007970122,0.52353907,0.43579537,0.035862286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013173788,0.0000088360985,0.0014963077,0.0004649255,0.000004628423,0.000064593805,0.0042252457,0.0001541057,0.00006889615,0.15549342,0.8379846,0.00002117375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05808938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112954564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99552816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008880046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007841775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11550254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996358293","doi":"10.1080/09627250408553648","title":"Problem-solving justice: responding to real problems, real people","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice Matters","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Accountability; Framing (construction); Economic Justice; Politics; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05590135572358874,"score_gpt":0.3840260932875483,"score_spread":0.32812473756395955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996358293","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004317234,0.026541872,0.013056817,0.9101084,0.0068776975,0.00009473733,0.00003163802,0.00026859948,0.038703006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.256337,0.047115408,0.044779573,0.6012843,0.012545345,0.0007463578,0.00018182579,0.0008296087,0.03618055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94185406,0.04003996,0.001313804,0.0034381622,0.008987345,0.0043667187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96664876,0.016256621,0.002149,0.0024594604,0.00403935,0.008446727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024876434,0.001880124,0.0017212861,0.0027921612,0.020023717,0.030119402,0.0037217792,0.018708449,0.0066046347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027884549,0.00077844306,0.0011919677,0.001955105,0.103032045,0.034295622,0.017476685,0.040110998,0.0028735553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029395753,0.00035655216,0.0012216914,0.0011365046,0.00008506349,0.0004939937,0.09798506,0.00036757486,0.0005727187,0.3811651,0.42580354,0.0907828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039547424,0.0000985541,0.0006895211,0.001619729,0.000020064954,0.00063881633,0.07225847,0.0005282609,0.0002932732,0.4386296,0.4850955,0.00008860743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051328107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009300834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030119402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010168227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031957913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13156068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996805634","doi":"10.2118/0302-0012-jpt","title":"The Need for a Strong Code of Ethics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Petroleum Technology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Apache (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Computer science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Programming language; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10377978566447066,"score_gpt":0.4165130920353061,"score_spread":0.31273330637083546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996805634","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002559086,0.0037022354,0.0007437446,0.58710706,0.39817208,0.000016079182,0.00005931784,0.000053666125,0.009889886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013484234,0.0059405086,0.001967922,0.36976776,0.57242155,0.00007097859,0.00012666003,0.00015836823,0.036062013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877559,0.003031937,0.0010472329,0.0010268855,0.006320865,0.0008171281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89357626,0.05661844,0.003166024,0.0044840868,0.035202425,0.0069527696],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009661982,0.00068322656,0.001248236,0.0012658703,0.003279443,0.009504966,0.0018935375,0.016808257,0.012510876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09067067,0.0005912619,0.0009266015,0.00061623135,0.006382061,0.00781948,0.0020599666,0.033883005,0.005783357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016087795,0.000006688136,0.000033637712,0.00011597559,0.0000063203693,0.00014254962,0.000054062297,0.00002328648,0.000071015376,0.015910909,0.9784193,0.005200098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002995911,0.000023120157,0.00037019356,0.00039658538,0.000016565467,0.00039251204,0.00018297376,0.0002454477,0.00021963155,0.022161232,0.9759346,0.000027105629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015359992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031697615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9831917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002646241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058017317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05109811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997688969","doi":"10.1080/14443050209387790","title":"Law: The search for community","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Australian Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Nature","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.5078833097919121,"score_gpt":0.5289148499308668,"score_spread":0.021031540138954696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997688969","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021449732,0.011473508,0.0035535623,0.77150065,0.0013332844,0.000045605084,0.000081219805,0.00006302138,0.19049941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8653871,0.00836238,0.0025836038,0.051160313,0.0020456845,0.00011333499,0.00008565431,0.00009438225,0.07016757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939008,0.0035056458,0.0001496776,0.0005076568,0.0010864594,0.0008498498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97855306,0.011082685,0.0013859574,0.0014476419,0.002315689,0.005214968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009893335,0.00025379367,0.0007848892,0.00295279,0.015181683,0.01630848,0.0019975177,0.015511641,0.042984057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03589655,0.00039997723,0.0004136263,0.0028614292,0.042412497,0.025905447,0.012574211,0.010023568,0.0027180768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011124778,0.000030809737,0.00059139694,0.000067335415,0.0000028796692,0.00010472718,0.009812151,0.000041063176,0.00003621325,0.9086318,0.06011215,0.020558389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019789059,0.000022269585,0.0014718315,0.00056278036,0.00000715161,0.00015435941,0.032095663,0.0003935189,0.00007284527,0.6064718,0.35870785,0.000020159396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022601336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029102268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042984057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009312159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02079773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14379603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999389045","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00666.x","title":"JUDICIAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Welfare; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06960463949241635,"score_gpt":0.41601493926083655,"score_spread":0.3464102997684202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999389045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011099524,0.013070032,0.04706965,0.02753711,0.0065052067,0.0017662297,0.00042264033,0.0005215792,0.89200807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2677776,0.008837171,0.037044346,0.020468075,0.0037390008,0.0009940984,0.0007763102,0.00035798125,0.6600054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9636035,0.011984239,0.0031064067,0.004396007,0.012420592,0.0044891876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676399,0.013373284,0.0019131434,0.0045261323,0.01029562,0.002251922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029536378,0.0005175817,0.0010312501,0.0029312507,0.010789106,0.009474153,0.0038322578,0.0061900173,0.044935778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068783045,0.00045469758,0.0009786866,0.0018671144,0.0051140664,0.0042009233,0.00819298,0.0066503803,0.0117384195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039454866,0.00010500209,0.0007312139,0.00027952358,0.000018997605,0.0004968377,0.0034417748,0.00020574886,0.00076021056,0.6176336,0.22213136,0.1541563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002290693,0.00006438545,0.0006108203,0.00037282068,0.00001231266,0.00027228985,0.0017874951,0.00025590975,0.0007359851,0.055687383,0.940153,0.000024725816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006947426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010762822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044935778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062345257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019113198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15620518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999703210","doi":"10.1177/0964663905051225","title":"Corporatism and Legal Education in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatism; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Political science; Hierarchy; Power (physics); Period (music); Law; Relation (database); Space (punctuation); Sociology; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.04297319922867225,"score_gpt":0.4026846579921464,"score_spread":0.35971145876347416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999703210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3531025,0.02584423,0.00078060717,0.12656516,0.00086885336,0.000120084565,0.00040491336,0.00010316772,0.4922104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93200046,0.0068356697,0.0005379868,0.007420053,0.00010474864,0.000024093863,0.00010826725,0.00003054645,0.052938104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963613,0.0003795673,0.00007794884,0.00027679524,0.0010225707,0.0018818962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945544,0.0009728797,0.00040868364,0.00009006324,0.0015475908,0.0024263992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016648831,0.0001920769,0.0003678998,0.0018354519,0.026015857,0.005843738,0.0015425421,0.0020332963,0.0114320675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005880901,0.00033645733,0.0002609469,0.0041648103,0.010691695,0.0013724616,0.0029454133,0.0038257665,0.0002495126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008871347,0.00025900258,0.026288016,0.0004553529,0.000039154293,0.0011047199,0.05248238,0.0013793167,0.00051246217,0.7159396,0.07434919,0.12710214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007780795,0.00010692198,0.14716665,0.0011789027,0.00006168519,0.00029711684,0.057156138,0.001387244,0.0005205379,0.02440003,0.76750326,0.00014368248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99867356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79931545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20068452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3391914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9270927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000174386","doi":"10.1177/000842980303200122","title":"Comptes rendus / Reviews of books: Consequentialism Stephen Darwall, editor Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. vii + 301 p. Contractarianism/ Contractualism Stephen Darwall, editor Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. vii + 286 p. Deontology Stephen Darwall, editor Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. vii + 242 p. Virtue Ethics Stephen Darwall, editor Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. vii + 261 p","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contractualism; Consequentialism; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07761036790258986,"score_gpt":0.39836073382874854,"score_spread":0.3207503659261587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000174386","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015367083,0.8945489,0.00092054595,0.021630056,0.017932652,0.000019479658,0.0005222882,0.00015982849,0.06411257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039034602,0.77962416,0.0017732201,0.0065890066,0.015864875,0.00006336962,0.0010624917,0.00039597103,0.19072337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983625,0.0002721468,0.0001751893,0.00018215136,0.00093759823,0.00007043796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951407,0.0019262467,0.00043989092,0.00034755518,0.0017837761,0.0003619476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015507251,0.0018606855,0.0016394946,0.007813301,0.0013739119,0.0051245117,0.0015886191,0.0024148468,0.089446135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058185253,0.0009998798,0.0008690055,0.008928908,0.0028640875,0.0049648476,0.0016335081,0.0035604546,0.04372688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010548525,0.000007102791,0.00004246696,0.00081621093,0.0000081428625,0.000026582014,0.000104994724,0.00008927969,0.000059203343,0.004094842,0.94790107,0.046839595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002589162,0.0000032656587,0.00022221298,0.0013204658,0.000005351557,0.00008197312,0.00010275558,0.000023701496,0.00003177287,0.0034162067,0.99478334,0.000006415759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0102187535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018633408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089446135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035241086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052014315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29922712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003170428","doi":"10.1002/sem3.20015","title":"From Behaviors of Concern to Disruption of the Learning Environment: A View of Student Judicial Affairs through a Strategic Enrollment Management Lens","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Enrollment Management Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley; Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Student affairs; Context (archaeology); Citation; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Law; Management; Higher education; History; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.05872000187830781,"score_gpt":0.35177928114156315,"score_spread":0.29305927926325537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003170428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2102176,0.0028714212,0.05188742,0.13187616,0.00063023303,0.00010610767,0.00016657298,0.0001415489,0.6021029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875136,0.0007800432,0.0028312749,0.0027957992,0.00021850287,0.000059075865,0.000029261077,0.000039816663,0.005732692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974099,0.0017032989,0.000050463805,0.0001667501,0.000287642,0.00038200544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635893,0.0014641286,0.00057164335,0.00019523763,0.0005286595,0.0008812996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024336793,0.0005742947,0.0002885726,0.0041384404,0.008531713,0.01642086,0.00193994,0.0055518304,0.004732266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004272109,0.00042220953,0.0005236926,0.0022853687,0.036254175,0.012781058,0.0064049102,0.006880962,0.00031688946],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011357068,0.00007890678,0.0029248253,0.00002366824,0.000005053172,0.00025104923,0.041555643,0.00047236233,0.00018543102,0.94892275,0.0014699723,0.0040988885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025128247,0.00015113961,0.009976499,0.00031020932,0.000028279728,0.00054616446,0.2763956,0.004400239,0.0005067381,0.6112589,0.09634517,0.00005596028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016905956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020145457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016905956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074592694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010479108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054121017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003993170","doi":"10.1002/alt.20180","title":"With mediation leading the way, justice department readies progress report Touting big adr savings","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Economic Justice; Treasure; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Resolution (logic); Advertising; Business; Law; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.046274783450450635,"score_gpt":0.38648320296937216,"score_spread":0.34020841951892156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003993170","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010202371,0.007938275,0.002725453,0.6194842,0.017685082,0.0003597346,0.012576511,0.0016532601,0.32737514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10912047,0.015055198,0.0137150865,0.118648075,0.006782021,0.0004602459,0.015184189,0.0007997627,0.720235],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867958,0.0020744584,0.0005428603,0.0007011945,0.00802019,0.0018655654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97970885,0.00362069,0.000850005,0.0010507609,0.010232392,0.004537395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012557662,0.0008713964,0.00039879547,0.001965561,0.0033658126,0.010886681,0.0016126097,0.0049156644,0.09010089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026848033,0.00035859554,0.00084396463,0.0014081877,0.0008965988,0.0046703885,0.0034742549,0.005536538,0.018647714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003407448,0.000063737876,0.00091337267,0.00006269576,0.000011185359,0.00005230889,0.00007929509,0.00006585766,0.00014581233,0.00920982,0.9541583,0.035203483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004245779,0.00009168923,0.004677117,0.00025160436,0.000028043194,0.00006462424,0.0009702344,0.00022354242,0.0006294526,0.0027040474,0.99029166,0.00002559508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055671085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07343922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09010089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064215674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039992537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30141747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004406805","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907071375","title":"Defending Rights in Russia: Lawyers, the State, and Legal Reform in the Post-Soviet Era","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; State (computer science); Law; Politics; Communism; Legislature; Judicial independence","score_opus":0.023296046616560005,"score_gpt":0.35359377397731445,"score_spread":0.33029772736075447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004406805","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07120885,0.38239303,0.000709322,0.45369303,0.0016300953,0.000015210323,0.00003736032,0.000025379168,0.090287715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82707345,0.13608678,0.00043815855,0.01056708,0.0025724133,0.000024641822,0.000029088485,0.000016811411,0.023191575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877006,0.00074114295,0.000027997667,0.000060023853,0.00020328011,0.00019758828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998917,0.0006917853,0.00016159743,0.00002766294,0.00006120692,0.00014081114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022982245,0.00027768235,0.00039560103,0.0010916096,0.005303784,0.009384337,0.0008079177,0.00355888,0.0016676299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018395073,0.00019851213,0.00019434429,0.0025572926,0.013767166,0.0058705625,0.0029953483,0.004196252,0.0001895245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039015275,0.0001010152,0.0034631263,0.00023900458,0.00001678868,0.0002924536,0.08814342,0.00034177434,0.00021868634,0.7752725,0.08913384,0.042738464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004769021,0.000083320716,0.026001802,0.001315911,0.000027613192,0.00030636546,0.112859026,0.0005524206,0.000541499,0.2932593,0.56496143,0.000043621454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018465497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05487656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018465497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007020117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075897584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050934732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004457759","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.131530","title":"Absolute power of attorney","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Courtesy; Computer science; Power (physics); Absolute (philosophy); Absolute power; Philosophy; Theology; Physics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01407236750503455,"score_gpt":0.3164130508946021,"score_spread":0.30234068338956754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004457759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019341737,0.0011755682,0.0025931692,0.06571199,0.004959533,0.000043310898,0.0001359181,0.00038145736,0.923065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09917579,0.0009966927,0.0021292951,0.065232,0.0026042953,0.00012626036,0.00018188705,0.0006078465,0.82894605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930878,0.0010720459,0.00022703531,0.0010541233,0.0032084729,0.0013504323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99351805,0.001019552,0.00022128617,0.00074723305,0.0031932408,0.0013006491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003408607,0.0005240556,0.0004966808,0.0011728085,0.009659272,0.011053213,0.0014331848,0.0062271645,0.15739125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020279242,0.00056307286,0.00046865406,0.0008044131,0.004410065,0.007235599,0.0062317783,0.009442201,0.05334864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017280216,0.00001581834,0.00050770026,0.00003062984,0.000005147274,0.00020368148,0.0011923366,0.000043564138,0.00017135253,0.2999816,0.6676279,0.030203084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047787466,0.0000067840774,0.000325982,0.000091365735,0.0000035507853,0.0001930943,0.00064893725,0.000054383363,0.000114774615,0.0178549,0.9806902,0.000011311201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016185543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019357959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15739125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004246647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007553015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5265262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005639902","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2014.987780","title":"The making of the Canadian legal profession: a hybrid heritage","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Corporate governance; Indigenous; Law; Legal service; Adversarial system; Power (physics); Political science; International Legal English Certificate; State (computer science); Neglect; Service (business); Sociology; Comparative law; Management; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.028011926504160276,"score_gpt":0.3907726011147516,"score_spread":0.3627606746105913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005639902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06560058,0.009719721,0.0039462317,0.109418906,0.0013882809,0.00010568985,0.00047808138,0.0001600707,0.8091824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8668551,0.008670902,0.004790941,0.008646624,0.00026908325,0.000047274312,0.00017738802,0.000110700006,0.11043198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504423,0.0005159266,0.0000745422,0.0004826798,0.0023805099,0.0015020749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580765,0.00045580714,0.0001374386,0.00018719779,0.0018983003,0.0015136099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027612296,0.00041748866,0.0003858125,0.0041655977,0.035748128,0.014214265,0.0015527235,0.0027111473,0.011335324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043319254,0.00038612416,0.0003765201,0.005082913,0.025637131,0.002929799,0.0040063737,0.003996376,0.00074445945],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030852527,0.000028116017,0.0027340073,0.00009083044,0.000010711932,0.00034357797,0.03857842,0.0003385976,0.00044601038,0.86222386,0.05138298,0.043791935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000107469195,0.000017456654,0.007925854,0.00024202775,0.000016141565,0.00020998258,0.026952969,0.0004049142,0.00020687385,0.028572418,0.93537056,0.00007008975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17967094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17967094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2845153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9514654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008887626","doi":"10.15173/glj.v1i2.1077","title":"Review of Michael Burawoy's 'The Extended Case Method'","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Labour Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.028107143368037817,"score_gpt":0.44485535559585343,"score_spread":0.4167482122278156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008887626","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058387936,0.9512492,0.0065127197,0.017879676,0.005393473,0.00021292857,0.00015530053,0.000049971313,0.017962866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009089227,0.9590635,0.012671316,0.009258464,0.002303637,0.00079469,0.00026715957,0.000103305814,0.006448744],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96995395,0.019845065,0.0018981872,0.001508829,0.006362417,0.0004316198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91522837,0.06560553,0.0027422905,0.0024600613,0.012874258,0.0010895191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023783293,0.001271852,0.0018935555,0.015155276,0.0024779756,0.007764136,0.003565498,0.003565478,0.008527313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070343755,0.001083213,0.0008110915,0.030277032,0.0071472507,0.008860611,0.0034657796,0.0037413056,0.0034218566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060885002,0.00011896527,0.0007343724,0.013970012,0.00006636752,0.00023577533,0.004885278,0.00030679614,0.00013812537,0.10392141,0.3829855,0.49257642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013208009,0.000020930485,0.0012195304,0.01757212,0.000019389758,0.00022716046,0.0011271178,0.00010372608,0.00005905824,0.0053654294,0.97424465,0.00002763425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017938744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032704715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023783293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0120479725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013608099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12577957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010265656","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.3.425","title":"Legal Ethics at a Time of Regulatory Change: The Sixth International Legal Ethics Conference, London","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1427102844206633,"score_gpt":0.42337192878588,"score_spread":0.2806616443652167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010265656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003013976,0.07557044,0.00025261182,0.85722905,0.01053923,0.000024226614,0.00003381782,0.000025018662,0.05331155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2684842,0.08389474,0.0018086014,0.20652075,0.011660062,0.0002489111,0.00018319681,0.00033655,0.426863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810832,0.009514176,0.00091915374,0.0011621282,0.0045613046,0.0027600254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98345333,0.0065039243,0.001098738,0.0008235797,0.0019457922,0.0061746924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021435255,0.00069514406,0.00077944,0.0011703427,0.00985429,0.023723176,0.0023062013,0.021696428,0.010659298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024273753,0.00078059616,0.0006159522,0.0017291278,0.024906266,0.012353838,0.008239398,0.019329533,0.0024413036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047220896,0.000044329816,0.00038980952,0.00026422786,0.000010179059,0.0009674395,0.024503103,0.00018095698,0.0002489545,0.13102627,0.82020587,0.022111673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014509871,0.000009801152,0.00058056373,0.0005533193,0.00000227533,0.00015950702,0.012112271,0.000023716471,0.00009232069,0.009656123,0.97677165,0.000023921386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04655244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095918275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04655244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03616097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03365353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26236743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011503928","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2007.9959751","title":"Wands away (or preaching to infidels who wear earplugs)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Nothing; Obligation; MAGIC (telescope); Wizard; Meaning (existential); Feeling; Order (exchange); Comprehension; Psychology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Law; Art; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07065791510760375,"score_gpt":0.43585564644162045,"score_spread":0.3651977313340167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011503928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35535836,0.0016461539,0.049104717,0.029248692,0.003438846,0.00037657807,0.000368203,0.0052945064,0.5551639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4672342,0.0011245579,0.0285666,0.014203632,0.0003660981,0.00018636926,0.0002574999,0.00091017585,0.4871508],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999046,0.00026201163,0.000033659275,0.00019814602,0.00014382022,0.0003162019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978854,0.00034480993,0.00030356922,0.0003269363,0.000245099,0.0008942405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011845356,0.0008400585,0.0004918658,0.00094403746,0.0059306226,0.0021304514,0.0011153893,0.0029719863,0.09641951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063690515,0.0005374277,0.0004971666,0.00034614187,0.004632371,0.0036181873,0.0038315589,0.003117617,0.047508746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042012896,0.0012477249,0.02762643,0.00042799732,0.000052840005,0.004855343,0.25836086,0.00029818012,0.02617142,0.031744797,0.30378973,0.34500456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033860615,0.0006182543,0.014087495,0.00063988677,0.000043708707,0.0035452845,0.21268535,0.00035265807,0.003924235,0.00817761,0.75576216,0.00012952353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006338927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013123643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09641951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007799701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012196451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32255542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012170552","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2014.977792","title":"Corporate lawyers and their clients: walking the line between law and business","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Line (geometry); Law; Business; Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.05079369631470559,"score_gpt":0.37526455453641777,"score_spread":0.3244708582217122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012170552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85837096,0.003615884,0.009015983,0.066540144,0.00008352798,0.000066013024,0.00002769485,0.000094849755,0.06218497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939826,0.0006944991,0.0011605842,0.0019134021,0.000017486433,0.000028064971,0.000007221414,0.000015443899,0.0021805828],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.976538,0.01762496,0.0003299367,0.0010690013,0.0024451006,0.0019929835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98434573,0.010171002,0.0020709878,0.00057447836,0.0008651645,0.0019726153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010779737,0.00031992322,0.0006829665,0.001950967,0.017470898,0.021221243,0.0019923882,0.006115719,0.0056950883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025164876,0.0009998835,0.000161736,0.002219909,0.024464961,0.016220903,0.010848986,0.005792533,0.00093736907],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029885454,0.00010544287,0.01718095,0.000055439043,0.000008834553,0.0009941095,0.8928704,0.00008993738,0.00035883227,0.05538787,0.0029730825,0.02994523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013781473,0.000046879468,0.004707474,0.0002230613,0.000008835759,0.00091399497,0.9441887,0.00042203997,0.00016972669,0.027865069,0.021412397,0.000027989592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011429175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013962189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021221243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069152606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008166829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0570094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012417400","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2010.0005","title":"Methodology and Perspective in the Theory of Lawyers' Ethics: A Response to Professors Woolley and Markovits","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Adjudication; Sociology; Identity (music); Legal profession; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09049720170802593,"score_gpt":0.4104518565846362,"score_spread":0.31995465487661023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012417400","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007343078,0.008160255,0.0015320751,0.98588747,0.0019719382,0.000008402713,0.000007135882,0.0000073630376,0.0016909344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11874207,0.02372258,0.010361584,0.80853486,0.026338592,0.0004816783,0.000032834545,0.00013684909,0.011648998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8618429,0.11535242,0.0026257047,0.0058551175,0.012219113,0.0021047778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7191429,0.25371295,0.004891596,0.0038352343,0.01236926,0.006048018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.096283816,0.0010890301,0.0025326756,0.0033851585,0.01554505,0.02073401,0.0066488176,0.024868917,0.0029569382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10255802,0.0011535814,0.0015806727,0.0038962415,0.091950454,0.02415584,0.01186183,0.04762149,0.0006710002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029466233,0.000055874225,0.0002801518,0.00020281698,0.000012448418,0.00018147171,0.025197048,0.00032987134,0.00006641705,0.84667987,0.12024385,0.006720617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060999555,0.000045393183,0.0003843664,0.0008910643,0.000008712483,0.00016203764,0.020409977,0.001038517,0.0001125826,0.573757,0.4030662,0.00006314192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01995214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021288844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096283816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030274263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020022871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50920355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015415709","doi":"10.1007/s10609-014-9235-y","title":"Criminal Justice Reform and the System’s Efficiency","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Law Forum","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Process (computing); Political science; Public international law; Sustainable development; Law; Public administration; Business; International law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03531765942655648,"score_gpt":0.3451952809486887,"score_spread":0.3098776215221322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015415709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43518624,0.0024980418,0.02565942,0.16251954,0.0005017254,0.00047917687,0.0004744059,0.0003309497,0.37235057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866442,0.00018694237,0.001764417,0.0017394762,0.0002100998,0.00007801484,0.000037401885,0.000029807383,0.00930971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720267,0.017326066,0.00072779,0.0016476432,0.003325602,0.0049461336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95938665,0.022629952,0.0039006984,0.004159172,0.0063778018,0.0035456263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024666617,0.0004061369,0.00089516985,0.003663538,0.0045103687,0.017122753,0.0019121062,0.006431179,0.020609608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06338055,0.00050493405,0.00084695214,0.0025539692,0.010269984,0.00881018,0.005992641,0.0039750007,0.0013834836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021667435,0.00042074145,0.015873257,0.00014070148,0.00016662854,0.00009804466,0.0014069283,0.009107711,0.00063694373,0.9181854,0.009192262,0.04455472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000531603,0.00044018342,0.045915056,0.00028206577,0.00019209019,0.00013508518,0.0030908424,0.0322854,0.0021053434,0.8513415,0.06360044,0.00008044326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011144734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010893569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024666617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016756343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019414764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13045114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016390031","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.48.2.305","title":"Commentary: Gone But Not Forgotten: Should Judges Be Allowed to Remedy by Re-sentencing?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Criminology; Law; Economic Justice; Sentencing guidelines; Psychology; Criminal justice; Political science; Philosophy; Sentence","score_opus":0.15219045557122368,"score_gpt":0.3664769625786127,"score_spread":0.214286507007389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016390031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015294636,0.000999873,0.00006355882,0.97174793,0.025698459,0.000014222956,0.000053976975,0.000014844477,0.0012542462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020571337,0.0005950456,0.00013330774,0.97837466,0.01622461,0.00004824611,0.000016199323,0.000023898207,0.0025267755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98050284,0.006362307,0.0021810373,0.0028513158,0.0061205756,0.0019818177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9175243,0.052470203,0.0028917901,0.0012643667,0.021692954,0.004156405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015529666,0.0014110088,0.0024575642,0.001677257,0.013117592,0.0056805257,0.010039082,0.101206064,0.0077745235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13119031,0.0014320906,0.0020895188,0.0027012622,0.009160733,0.0064822016,0.0029444473,0.08204049,0.007204533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029746961,0.0000050835074,0.00005230402,0.0001087974,0.000009399889,0.0001737424,0.00045946823,0.000021347854,0.0000692279,0.0019769992,0.99549675,0.0015970945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010535086,0.00005378343,0.0008088523,0.0017567286,0.00009134519,0.0005025419,0.0028530161,0.00028166478,0.00046426448,0.009544681,0.9834102,0.000127521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09635587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10990681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101206064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01455116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028438726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19159001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017316122","doi":"10.1017/s1472669600002164","title":"Laying the Foundations for Law Library Co-operation around the world","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Library science; China; Political science; Desk; Service (business); Sociology; Law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.044244145073227506,"score_gpt":0.36856861482718134,"score_spread":0.32432446975395385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017316122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007750675,0.0064610704,0.012426469,0.7995306,0.0070571774,0.00029602542,0.00009543345,0.0007860524,0.16559649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4722421,0.009980231,0.043558393,0.19810013,0.006047079,0.0023355202,0.0006918621,0.001743099,0.26530164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9294834,0.03585785,0.0024451667,0.006227714,0.010073144,0.015912741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8006765,0.031062342,0.007562246,0.013270346,0.033971354,0.1134572],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06311786,0.0012438471,0.0013091174,0.006492316,0.050670996,0.09155596,0.007123034,0.02928543,0.07261771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09489757,0.0021072167,0.0011875513,0.006365591,0.030739853,0.08137995,0.0662095,0.03397757,0.029373331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000968174,0.00036468462,0.0031530093,0.00031602356,0.000048543392,0.0007343215,0.029939124,0.00040633374,0.00035300697,0.44297805,0.4159966,0.1056134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050312796,0.00006892091,0.0011476115,0.0007224479,0.000013918935,0.0001542674,0.046674266,0.00031477844,0.00019701337,0.0826636,0.86791414,0.000078743185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014202245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015705219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90844405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019242438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09278639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33380318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020765254","doi":"10.7202/1006698ar","title":"Former l’apprenti juriste à une approche du droit réflexive, critique et sereinement positiviste : l’heureuse expérience d’une revisite du cours « Fondements du droit » à l’Université de Montréal","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01493980828004705,"score_gpt":0.26409958917967596,"score_spread":0.24915978089962892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020765254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2572661,0.02357902,0.0144925285,0.17788474,0.0014702165,0.0001890561,0.00018766,0.00017145433,0.5247592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91164726,0.003333126,0.0015826378,0.005462884,0.00019779151,0.000060430793,0.000027512886,0.00007743574,0.07761095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98885006,0.0056165955,0.00018496855,0.0009950305,0.0028484906,0.0015048818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909218,0.0043829656,0.0006149833,0.00061271334,0.0018185965,0.0016489731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008258543,0.00057203905,0.00049117825,0.0014476376,0.028035564,0.018854208,0.0023891975,0.0041645886,0.009194084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011818042,0.00043318383,0.00040653278,0.0027746125,0.049691353,0.0061245253,0.008362573,0.005945382,0.0006394577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003880225,0.000032614338,0.0024539568,0.00013356343,0.000014807709,0.0005109444,0.37379712,0.00027959113,0.0009869791,0.5854609,0.012913705,0.02337703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024349225,0.00006332216,0.0075254533,0.0004128657,0.000024372317,0.00019756035,0.23154233,0.00044087833,0.00093460514,0.03800442,0.7207308,0.00009901837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78753906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8706188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91055036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08944962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.088649996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6490055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022301090","doi":"10.1353/utq.2005.0053","title":"Law's Dream of a Common Knowledge (review)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Law; Dream; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Need to know; Population; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.021572949826014525,"score_gpt":0.31642564536196016,"score_spread":0.2948526955359456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022301090","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022521735,0.99345654,0.00003046101,0.004249789,0.0013451896,0.000009967983,0.00004428658,0.000008374876,0.0008329785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005146821,0.99304754,0.00005680608,0.0043045254,0.0012100643,0.000025077705,0.00009147072,0.000004480463,0.00074537453],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783236,0.000501241,0.00037621663,0.00024142854,0.00087215303,0.00017657882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99011517,0.0044671115,0.0013548337,0.0002049456,0.0031201348,0.0007377626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025325082,0.0008768745,0.0024543025,0.005182709,0.000772395,0.004749246,0.0025875363,0.0038018944,0.017505128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014792133,0.00070884207,0.0012819745,0.0064214794,0.0013285461,0.005239754,0.0016829764,0.004383664,0.0050501605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004896727,0.00002781617,0.00017725072,0.05835653,0.00022876823,0.0001336742,0.00012296408,0.0000912252,0.00009933538,0.0022221317,0.5516345,0.3868569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004351145,0.000034884695,0.0012313467,0.08018631,0.00026885752,0.000569144,0.00020032912,0.00004307796,0.00005013465,0.0017079653,0.91563207,0.000032464428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006340634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0109541565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017505128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027680353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009026747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05856055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202267463","doi":"","title":"The Real Issues of Judicial Ethics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appearance of impropriety; Law; Appeal; Joke; Quarter (Canadian coin); Magistrate; Political science; Legal ethics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.05889109318111226,"score_gpt":0.3970591353102256,"score_spread":0.33816804212911333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202267463","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007472333,0.019387247,0.009270522,0.5918292,0.004019231,0.0000315566,0.000060784085,0.000052219915,0.36787692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71740115,0.009445873,0.0062958132,0.16076747,0.01237367,0.00026689935,0.000081592996,0.0002234447,0.09314415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95724744,0.027796833,0.0008687351,0.0024442032,0.007708809,0.0039339764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97451186,0.015167065,0.001395292,0.002715159,0.003985677,0.002224822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021441413,0.00056137494,0.00068594626,0.0015111509,0.013556441,0.021665655,0.002242277,0.014029479,0.0072569945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04253566,0.00060256745,0.00066433684,0.0011411079,0.06385589,0.01601772,0.006347881,0.02286817,0.0019221242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025185075,0.000004842316,0.000056538353,0.000011194152,0.0000015824636,0.000026279766,0.0013051069,0.000029920868,0.000016399317,0.97975874,0.01692495,0.0018619619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011736187,0.0000068386357,0.00018656197,0.00017028768,0.0000028747158,0.000087113316,0.0028900092,0.00019710079,0.000056939116,0.75622964,0.24014895,0.0000119167535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006451164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074337777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021665655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013093749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011725617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11339438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028193201","doi":"10.1080/0270319x.2014.922398","title":"Electronic Legal Research Tools: An Examination of the Resources Available, Training of New Attorneys, and Employer Expectations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Reference Services Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Legal writing; Legal education; Scholarship; Legal profession; Law library; Political science; Law; Sociology; Library science; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.12511290284780088,"score_gpt":0.39206933982013165,"score_spread":0.26695643697233074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028193201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958467,0.00010773379,0.00006316972,0.00078582624,0.0000038653025,0.00001336267,0.00004470928,0.0000041811304,0.0031304054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988387,0.00009125232,0.00008068101,0.00012085394,0.000005762639,0.000012278609,0.000051013052,0.0000024245205,0.0007971014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930702,0.0019582347,0.000714538,0.00037934736,0.0030798248,0.00079780235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9190784,0.03818416,0.02124426,0.0020333056,0.009292366,0.010167513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009065355,0.000111246896,0.00020526903,0.0021837375,0.001124346,0.0034530165,0.000815145,0.00071939593,0.0065358584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05328278,0.0002806184,0.0003351961,0.0013878418,0.0011107816,0.0025918582,0.0023767406,0.0010387626,0.00062213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000734192,0.000724023,0.95655125,0.000051538173,0.000019131076,0.00021971852,0.019307105,0.000068966816,0.00028054736,0.00036941425,0.00079665356,0.021538278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004150633,0.00016739317,0.9690618,0.00006672896,0.0000066441266,0.00010687365,0.02847751,0.0002151834,0.00014479502,0.00012650064,0.0016097776,0.000012636962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077476874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116875125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009065355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013842507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023860105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047942758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029611428","doi":"10.1353/scp.2008.0009","title":"A Different Kind of Profession: The Council of Editors of Learned Journals (CELJ) Keynote Address MLA Convention 2006","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Sociology; Legal profession; Political science; Library science; Public relations; Law; Management; Engineering ethics; Media studies; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.22528911780739236,"score_gpt":0.3937313009811818,"score_spread":0.16844218317378945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029611428","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019403568,0.005400036,0.00083157764,0.84888744,0.09106351,0.000119163495,0.000091634065,0.0001278512,0.051538512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0612332,0.0042307773,0.0056610787,0.54493964,0.09678726,0.00035642143,0.0002173489,0.00047878711,0.2860955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96900296,0.0041593346,0.0032306209,0.004477695,0.014094815,0.005034624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938339,0.012613033,0.0072808103,0.003123334,0.02003841,0.01860544],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03474889,0.00092708285,0.0011709108,0.0020342476,0.015846388,0.04249669,0.0028651718,0.029141076,0.015119917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058259692,0.0010972635,0.0010848603,0.0017860001,0.008537131,0.013727348,0.008021235,0.03424986,0.00582871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058092945,0.000066000604,0.00054648,0.00015991846,0.000010720022,0.00019350431,0.0012456113,0.000040597937,0.0009012089,0.056372263,0.91912323,0.02128238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016282285,0.000019026102,0.000731726,0.00015383633,0.00000492704,0.0000631455,0.00043055558,0.000037315476,0.00017338528,0.0024823092,0.995858,0.000029472501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012809065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030234259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9575033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011618907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03904148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18377191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031108337","doi":"10.1089/blr.2012.9750","title":"Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuits Against Life Science Companies on the Rise in the First Quarter 2012","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biotechnology Law Report","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Quarter (Canadian coin); Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Business; Law; Securities fraud; Political science; History; State (computer science); Computer science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.06849701425227893,"score_gpt":0.36705103032902103,"score_spread":0.2985540160767421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031108337","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34507972,0.004838008,0.0017572735,0.38730672,0.0043936865,0.00035385933,0.0029540437,0.00056460133,0.2527521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61633843,0.002016732,0.0007603682,0.12814985,0.0025605296,0.00019959669,0.001288039,0.0000776949,0.24860866],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919322,0.0007167074,0.00039829532,0.0005779734,0.003825519,0.0025493612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98112947,0.0075932583,0.0035422393,0.00074607396,0.0042904327,0.00269852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006031029,0.0004772566,0.0006704786,0.0028322265,0.006855504,0.00790277,0.0012818188,0.021815544,0.0088672135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0246101,0.0007131341,0.00090692216,0.0017114988,0.0017334974,0.0026218898,0.002489397,0.013245427,0.0022673265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055616314,0.00095769344,0.04977789,0.00017534112,0.00013462114,0.002007382,0.003855294,0.00050815224,0.003563953,0.10819537,0.75851977,0.07174838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040283412,0.0006571852,0.16812408,0.0006136591,0.00037391612,0.0011305005,0.0041894233,0.004596491,0.014938424,0.011858119,0.79285777,0.00025763025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04866785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08200296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04866785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007451292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009289945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096769154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W203119075","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4364","title":"OPPORTUNITIES AND LIMITATIONS IN THE PROVISION OF SELF-HELP LEGAL RESOURCES TO CITIZENS IN NEED","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Process (computing); Service provider; Public relations; Legal research; Business; Legal service; Knowledge management; Point (geometry); Service (business); Internet privacy; Political science; Marketing; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.18574860047580985,"score_gpt":0.3929875146692892,"score_spread":0.20723891419347937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W203119075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6050663,0.01059054,0.0091938395,0.091609724,0.00023183024,0.00027755473,0.00009367195,0.00009764598,0.28283882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870026,0.003328539,0.004381278,0.0008769841,0.000049333812,0.00016614364,0.000024448389,0.000020518808,0.0041500833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773942,0.016243398,0.000567925,0.00074753386,0.0024041838,0.0026427733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689288,0.023923561,0.0015272947,0.0015226454,0.0019479825,0.0021496478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023693133,0.00031044145,0.00049644866,0.0023754823,0.008289709,0.013522655,0.0025328612,0.0041458244,0.0063943164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033055376,0.00053110096,0.0004728711,0.002321471,0.016151046,0.016364196,0.015349499,0.0026470101,0.00059388106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018138924,0.0003730008,0.022224031,0.0011778558,0.000027320388,0.0025185265,0.2403525,0.0008314071,0.00065015064,0.48684454,0.008360485,0.23645873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054875254,0.00037851217,0.0112420535,0.0040087453,0.00006001545,0.0037923788,0.63472986,0.0018546497,0.0007298018,0.14909542,0.19396958,0.00008417998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006123643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014286769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023693133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005967135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010355462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12530273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031535197","doi":"10.5235/147293412803188829","title":"Ontario's Administrative Tribunal Clusters: A Glass Half-full or Half-empty for Administrative Justice?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Statutory law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Administrative law; Business; Quality (philosophy); Law","score_opus":0.14550716466108246,"score_gpt":0.40249299024392743,"score_spread":0.256985825582845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031535197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31730792,0.0027271472,0.006625328,0.3329033,0.0010302286,0.00028643836,0.00039646693,0.00027980807,0.3384434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927221,0.0006126723,0.0023062257,0.009747002,0.000090169364,0.000073511386,0.000093550065,0.000068125686,0.059787687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611807,0.0005285277,0.00006511515,0.00034440184,0.001118686,0.0018252298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99501747,0.00055559404,0.00030038698,0.0005848833,0.0012040789,0.002337679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002380187,0.00022148395,0.0003237703,0.0006577546,0.028196596,0.009571754,0.0020795916,0.0032119316,0.008270859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008098624,0.00039414308,0.0003606277,0.0015381975,0.016112125,0.00506503,0.004812355,0.002695057,0.00064394117],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012563987,0.000074557516,0.017279958,0.0001320812,0.00003487057,0.0007678274,0.056269553,0.0008978906,0.0011245247,0.6411528,0.21447517,0.067665175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078994155,0.000060328144,0.03139375,0.00017294055,0.000039993785,0.00018198421,0.089332856,0.0013012723,0.00045846787,0.046726696,0.83013105,0.00012170453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94524586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98371774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93075866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06924133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.121440664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50238335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032183069","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342004","title":"A Best Practice Model for the Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Social Context Training for Judicial Officers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legislation; Political science; Constitution; Public relations; Best practice; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.48954993245133815,"score_gpt":0.5554687837529179,"score_spread":0.0659188513015797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032183069","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08640018,0.00051085727,0.8066489,0.0142110605,0.0002732256,0.027860317,0.00055084494,0.0015792164,0.061965514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20262468,0.00015612213,0.78565395,0.00039820562,0.000012184834,0.009583211,0.00019971181,0.000055357836,0.0013165993],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.86494434,0.11266127,0.004701118,0.004059727,0.010804,0.0028296374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88348585,0.07272191,0.007899759,0.012917185,0.018724402,0.004250982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08085203,0.0022074287,0.0010194519,0.0051885117,0.0029804958,0.009625535,0.0056882636,0.0065937717,0.009829512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11309565,0.0012797937,0.0014231239,0.0024188568,0.0057087834,0.0061504412,0.0052120523,0.0030713724,0.0017714007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018076424,0.010427313,0.017334322,0.00542118,0.00052161154,0.0011163491,0.029463677,0.11448266,0.008108609,0.3916891,0.011833553,0.4077941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00513675,0.011136501,0.012138512,0.009579523,0.0010814798,0.00085833884,0.032657184,0.50867295,0.015313763,0.2884606,0.114493765,0.00047067637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00818803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08085203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018577272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027835881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4275915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033011605","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.223","title":"Canada: Foreclosures, Freemen, Foreign Law Schools and the Continuing Search for Meaningful Access to Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Public access; Free access; Through-the-lens metering; Law; Lens (geology); Public administration; Engineering; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.10831789687854802,"score_gpt":0.4190919363500591,"score_spread":0.31077403947151105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033011605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18514805,0.029796036,0.00023438295,0.6396264,0.0020055478,0.00005299801,0.00092819415,0.000051211446,0.14215712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8498545,0.023532731,0.00028102932,0.06764791,0.0007313187,0.000034288267,0.0002925706,0.000059739607,0.057565916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969892,0.00019988205,0.000038774226,0.00014127405,0.00074985623,0.0018811282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99423224,0.0009019353,0.0004639609,0.00006862291,0.0009888426,0.0033442925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012889556,0.00029910033,0.0003859856,0.0019373657,0.031939883,0.014221156,0.0021103404,0.00701799,0.010920447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045658257,0.00032889703,0.00035833055,0.0052836365,0.012490452,0.003376163,0.0042079943,0.008746004,0.00038870386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009143105,0.0001527496,0.03715412,0.00048563135,0.000052477153,0.003033026,0.13230516,0.00041697224,0.00031516422,0.21585046,0.5413796,0.0687633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024793417,0.00002532359,0.081296645,0.0007113941,0.000048136364,0.0004003478,0.32437176,0.00024382531,0.00021779384,0.007911495,0.58461833,0.0001301463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99716777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12554793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12554793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26991022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91091824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045049176","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.1.135","title":"Canada: Death of a Legal Icon, Dawn of Change?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Law; Supreme court; Icon; Political science; Doors; Prime minister; History; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.19568745720635589,"score_gpt":0.424318465318099,"score_spread":0.22863100811174314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045049176","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009554866,0.010848788,0.00056932715,0.8347458,0.0038312247,0.000024291348,0.00024390646,0.00008050794,0.14010124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3658173,0.015878746,0.0009321766,0.44182092,0.0019021878,0.000044237313,0.0002579721,0.00021141054,0.17313516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99090123,0.00069445564,0.00012319584,0.00069268764,0.003995087,0.0035933128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99278533,0.0010995729,0.00027378442,0.00020121134,0.0038439818,0.0017962202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003262341,0.0005007746,0.00064404705,0.0013681328,0.03616229,0.0144626545,0.0031277703,0.010597128,0.011480853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012839164,0.00032899145,0.00058777933,0.0023250664,0.022626227,0.0054335827,0.0034139093,0.011910497,0.0010417242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042331365,0.000014846165,0.002384324,0.00013481636,0.00001626012,0.00059711456,0.01977897,0.00017716142,0.00015932055,0.32636768,0.62911844,0.021208711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010860229,0.000008996013,0.003151197,0.00030070005,0.000018789236,0.00010702829,0.023517232,0.00011872059,0.00016720557,0.010159638,0.962372,0.000067547626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1786194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1786194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29627272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95268506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045477339","doi":"10.1097/00001888-200110001-00016","title":"The Rhetoric of Rationalization","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Medicine","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalization (economics); Rhetoric; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.08900820945511195,"score_gpt":0.4589439008756494,"score_spread":0.36993569142053745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045477339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03759923,0.047341894,0.14812352,0.25120673,0.0031152647,0.0001843638,0.00023003841,0.00041159807,0.5117873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94067085,0.008501266,0.031027557,0.007861015,0.001941306,0.0002668218,0.00011435832,0.00021146971,0.009405398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9461263,0.042177297,0.0016104396,0.0032282767,0.0055699823,0.0012877055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9265035,0.058902163,0.0040022726,0.004693437,0.005024621,0.0008739721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032525133,0.0009077806,0.0010498596,0.0055210274,0.004275733,0.013342293,0.002178299,0.005272766,0.0037781978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06555845,0.00060641515,0.0007774956,0.0028452359,0.07279868,0.01909644,0.005538331,0.007308619,0.0009364367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009294064,0.000004424292,0.00016681799,0.00005575024,0.000004191325,0.000026490367,0.0025787095,0.0002257084,0.000037197075,0.9899546,0.0017243966,0.005212526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000790397,0.0000072464945,0.00011509299,0.0001494991,0.000004304611,0.000034241006,0.00074691087,0.00071001914,0.0001240738,0.9690935,0.02899926,0.0000079125675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002745321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014179588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032525133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011334361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076193097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17201144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049285175","doi":"10.7202/1025144ar","title":"Of Justice and Its Scales: Looking Back on (Almost) Forty Years of Rod Macdonald’s Scholarship on Access to Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.09051163513513426,"score_gpt":0.4056112552012065,"score_spread":0.31509962006607223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049285175","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055674245,0.15861705,0.0008625159,0.78443676,0.0074854284,0.000012752975,0.00015273207,0.000020309195,0.04284503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4444309,0.17326993,0.002667741,0.3126382,0.016160721,0.00020157907,0.00034216908,0.00024110787,0.050047655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98283535,0.0073227533,0.00087222015,0.0010124494,0.006349729,0.0016074592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953704,0.023950642,0.0033877695,0.0024780182,0.010339985,0.006139509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016553713,0.00044826858,0.00079695624,0.004806821,0.008042347,0.01091311,0.0019567283,0.0054689143,0.007550674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06509124,0.00030708275,0.0004434718,0.005285672,0.034312885,0.029722165,0.011706331,0.016880851,0.0010064063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052217583,0.000040390045,0.0024923105,0.00043751317,0.00002340755,0.00010042747,0.024563223,0.000067688474,0.000093316776,0.51735294,0.34481972,0.109956905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010635952,0.000044974488,0.009305582,0.00384278,0.000015610789,0.000117275486,0.017716777,0.000087117,0.000106363026,0.17653637,0.7921119,0.00010464393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05891443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10286766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05891443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014240588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015452806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117143035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050061770","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.26.1.81","title":"Legal Feminism and the Post-Racism Fantasy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Scholarship; Oppression; Feminism; Colonialism; Sociology; Gender studies; White (mutation); Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.020533839274851275,"score_gpt":0.29110096470236874,"score_spread":0.2705671254275175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050061770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07973339,0.013707854,0.0030141363,0.34885308,0.0011291296,0.000025132118,0.00004634249,0.000050114875,0.55344087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9216219,0.0025368659,0.00075477286,0.012362337,0.00026439593,0.000024572886,0.000012988319,0.000039720875,0.06238242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927817,0.0035131432,0.00008811559,0.00045413486,0.0017403009,0.00142261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99591184,0.0023527858,0.00035925672,0.00016963192,0.00065335503,0.0005531684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00646101,0.00040638572,0.00029046866,0.0017294621,0.02824776,0.010968249,0.0013047439,0.004641978,0.005400737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076926327,0.0002733008,0.0002477239,0.0010451449,0.09383165,0.005750598,0.0048374515,0.0060201795,0.00048729684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069279,0.000012424742,0.00042335066,0.000020431342,0.0000014324862,0.00031749078,0.14379208,0.000035207817,0.00011940311,0.8398705,0.008706501,0.006694313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000132581745,0.000022901955,0.0018537357,0.00027763587,0.000004138117,0.00066022103,0.16313411,0.00015420736,0.0003341776,0.16445896,0.66905564,0.00003100349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28580305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35716107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28580305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028246224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017854465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56827897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051050868","doi":"10.5367/000000002101296522","title":"Legal Issues within the Intellectual Property Policies of Canadian Universities","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industry and Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Business; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Legal responsibility; Public relations; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.09041744042259324,"score_gpt":0.3524386548100263,"score_spread":0.26202121438743303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051050868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22404179,0.0077532665,0.0056744805,0.20117119,0.00053324836,0.00021126516,0.00036862062,0.00020695904,0.5600392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93258214,0.0033592393,0.003996859,0.012467234,0.00013972529,0.00005593136,0.000100648795,0.00005591712,0.04724228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97205263,0.0033222197,0.0010709289,0.0012231534,0.012662614,0.009668381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9517524,0.019050801,0.0034788891,0.0018149195,0.0183621,0.005540864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019859985,0.00030028523,0.00044299773,0.0047224197,0.043906983,0.026307765,0.003415891,0.0069010733,0.004898307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053038526,0.000749685,0.000691707,0.007423684,0.019393723,0.004403151,0.004374857,0.006327057,0.0003719515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003432672,0.00004220085,0.0089031,0.00016066172,0.000024367,0.0007718266,0.028982168,0.0025937832,0.0007857554,0.87633634,0.031735238,0.049630255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037571663,0.000055047723,0.04221161,0.0013897375,0.00013272442,0.00045590886,0.066935815,0.004136961,0.002357246,0.097256474,0.78460526,0.00042565927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98492265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9865687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79565877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20434123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3507216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9228514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053572639","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977626","title":"Aristotle's <i>Nicomachean Ethics</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Happiness; Value (mathematics); Normative ethics; Meta-ethics; Environmental ethics; Applied ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Social science; Information ethics; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.09897859111288933,"score_gpt":0.3141878611192558,"score_spread":0.21520927000636647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053572639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035486997,0.028314624,0.004690739,0.023027372,0.001651006,0.000016695007,0.000026410213,0.0000315968,0.93869287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31686717,0.02593775,0.007846622,0.010556198,0.0020321142,0.0001620233,0.00006575471,0.000084183004,0.63644814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897563,0.000473929,0.000024107841,0.00009374147,0.00033401628,0.00009866009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995378,0.00023540636,0.000035144,0.000038194463,0.00011614627,0.000037302223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000999534,0.00039396502,0.0002489442,0.00084657175,0.0048795743,0.0043383883,0.00054585177,0.0021164909,0.0038501478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016974605,0.00013889957,0.00013683696,0.00088048587,0.012061271,0.0025304758,0.0010879101,0.002629252,0.0014342476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005271789,0.0000043488017,0.000062713676,0.000038677328,0.0000010480311,0.00004384463,0.0037927562,0.000077304765,0.00006373767,0.93461835,0.046654742,0.014637207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001770277,0.0000060551356,0.00025712393,0.00022167816,0.0000013904197,0.000086657885,0.0014487305,0.00011620694,0.0001412437,0.23227109,0.76544136,0.0000066607377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010700894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021024147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010700894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065544555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043912856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047556102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054368023","doi":"","title":"Do Ontario and its Gaming Venues Owe a Duty of Care to Problem Gamblers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Context (archaeology); Harm; Liability; Government (linguistics); Duty; Business; Duty to protect; Advertising; Law; Finance; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.015992735468182424,"score_gpt":0.3246380724001331,"score_spread":0.3086453369319507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054368023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.879427,0.00093279016,0.00014647521,0.058181554,0.00014963749,0.0000482541,0.00029559588,0.0000103612265,0.060808394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98540604,0.0008682283,0.00013368062,0.0036930016,0.000037823473,0.000010950405,0.00010846859,0.0000058405444,0.009735954],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981086,0.00018981691,0.000053561565,0.00009703612,0.0006704214,0.00088051136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99137306,0.00088235474,0.0019987845,0.00023926025,0.0017045423,0.0038020208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013798514,0.000095475254,0.00026831345,0.0006648743,0.0051991227,0.0021164403,0.0012170497,0.0017431588,0.008813354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0119148195,0.00026110516,0.00024401124,0.0012406122,0.0030653714,0.0017775384,0.0012837602,0.00096561003,0.0004183663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021402942,0.00036935887,0.7658198,0.00017802784,0.00004675017,0.0011494615,0.04540646,0.0002206344,0.00047640354,0.03293076,0.06424525,0.08894298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073495394,0.00011733079,0.78997344,0.0004021909,0.000049937345,0.0011443889,0.11438303,0.00079097407,0.00020349395,0.003983052,0.08879963,0.00007895929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9455409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9839496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054459095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018544868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04345975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13455307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055397043","doi":"10.1111/j.1911-3838.2012.00035.x","title":"The Case for Unifying a Profession","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Citation; Library science; Chief executive officer; Accounting; Management; Political science; Computer science; Business; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06774248383423641,"score_gpt":0.45203263949258454,"score_spread":0.3842901556583481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055397043","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046570744,0.0060972827,0.03259474,0.5118087,0.0038946408,0.00016170587,0.0000490859,0.00014039647,0.3986828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89075917,0.0016905239,0.019074118,0.045496553,0.0025935574,0.00038918108,0.000054975295,0.00013162066,0.03981031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97296154,0.012759915,0.00094140053,0.0032415888,0.0046667666,0.005428759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96267915,0.012742921,0.002435248,0.005940211,0.006086678,0.010115795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04039636,0.0008248094,0.0014249838,0.0056246673,0.02036706,0.024999397,0.0027507085,0.020709032,0.013994846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03459987,0.0007343891,0.0016091657,0.0027519881,0.101711504,0.03757329,0.02879616,0.027105326,0.0016574282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000111232275,0.000018160657,0.00016523652,0.000011586099,0.000003831973,0.00004278026,0.0039236764,0.000043082164,0.000044933055,0.99042845,0.0020582224,0.003249018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003831377,0.000024344517,0.00033740952,0.0001712881,0.0000089908135,0.00007828675,0.009641084,0.00031294968,0.00006969945,0.9207544,0.06854261,0.000020632275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015073074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014717484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04039636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016992604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04018816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21363896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056144851","doi":"10.5235/20414005.4.4.645","title":"Turbulent Transitions: Implementing Global Perspectives in Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transnational Legal Theory","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal education; Globalization; Legal realism; Legal pluralism; Political science; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Legal profession; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02359000658747235,"score_gpt":0.3676486777065727,"score_spread":0.3440586711191004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056144851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17994416,0.004148107,0.043854382,0.18405296,0.001374707,0.00029738006,0.00006089283,0.00037125638,0.58589625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97311056,0.0014231808,0.007772187,0.008514098,0.00009957026,0.0001232339,0.00003145872,0.00011524012,0.008810457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98945284,0.0067481888,0.00021807573,0.00077323295,0.0010383708,0.0017693327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924931,0.0034955763,0.00047540263,0.000806526,0.0005875695,0.0021418955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013292444,0.0005999597,0.00039116747,0.0017600055,0.012576964,0.018381558,0.0015799858,0.0037931814,0.0070576807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012405989,0.0003968974,0.00066244265,0.0025546434,0.037834354,0.01927276,0.02986599,0.008143729,0.0006573964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003002006,0.00008996245,0.0026478127,0.0001313454,0.000014436513,0.00033030796,0.17183045,0.0009786071,0.00030733948,0.77470744,0.0066428646,0.042289358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045795026,0.00012240012,0.0034817415,0.00048256884,0.000025838659,0.00012112514,0.271767,0.0009297359,0.0006069984,0.4949849,0.22738679,0.00004508616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018202862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033631604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018381558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014052544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026673773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10195881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W205749200","doi":"10.29173/alr42","title":"The World Needs More Rod Macdonald: The Potential of Big Ideas","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.026702873094160435,"score_gpt":0.359098844574357,"score_spread":0.33239597148019656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W205749200","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002149148,0.07252828,0.004214932,0.8993662,0.0037886845,0.00001973918,0.00001136341,0.000038172417,0.017883489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35676268,0.118931994,0.016994206,0.47407386,0.013139099,0.00024461557,0.00004006018,0.00017116067,0.019642394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9568586,0.031979095,0.0005974343,0.0012846421,0.007946173,0.0013339374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8484601,0.13150424,0.0019228951,0.004324617,0.0104401475,0.0033480988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047668222,0.00052747264,0.0007996948,0.0021063194,0.0054898914,0.012957488,0.0021122552,0.0055113696,0.0030962757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06476509,0.00038997844,0.0006599048,0.0016645264,0.030717203,0.015112527,0.005106672,0.01087652,0.0005801595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003698522,0.00003193843,0.0004635632,0.00045551054,0.000036512974,0.00013743408,0.00337514,0.00042702488,0.00013373722,0.8277534,0.122796595,0.044352036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027534184,0.00003748047,0.00048800252,0.0011289915,0.00002305342,0.000058585578,0.0054726033,0.0005252752,0.00018393931,0.70176506,0.290242,0.000047553032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020667747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03782645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047668222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009289597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023201723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25209665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058083404","doi":"10.1038/sj.jid.5700196","title":"The Private Side of the Professional Man","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Investigative Dermatology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Dartmouth College","keywords":"Joke; Clothing; White (mutation); Wonder; Art history; White coat; Medicine; Art; History; Psychology; Law; Literature; Political science; Chemistry; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029018635644093113,"score_gpt":0.35047342358502426,"score_spread":0.32145478794093113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058083404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02676689,0.0031165122,0.003263474,0.5847581,0.0048949257,0.000022359898,0.000031155283,0.00004794517,0.37709862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63475645,0.0018710612,0.0014256502,0.10530535,0.0039915284,0.000035588204,0.000019631681,0.00015297285,0.25244182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99017173,0.005480646,0.00017186848,0.00075173023,0.0018401449,0.001584016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98500407,0.005851777,0.00081789965,0.0015481641,0.0017940974,0.004984003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070295436,0.0003224242,0.00054405455,0.0010798351,0.021763803,0.013964119,0.0008905881,0.009892345,0.022573268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018314604,0.00046185168,0.00044131267,0.0006820968,0.048943102,0.011914156,0.008133733,0.018463258,0.0034293516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003639116,0.00006929447,0.0013817672,0.000029836167,0.000008622129,0.0006781943,0.03697108,0.00006179952,0.00019591488,0.824156,0.117727436,0.018683797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002630069,0.00006513426,0.0013908242,0.00023636052,0.0000112329335,0.0014862688,0.055243585,0.00029179684,0.00023134203,0.2566154,0.6843626,0.00003917166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068464717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013449048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022573268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00480116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009215754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07551509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058759980","doi":"10.1016/s0924-9338(11)72157-5","title":"Working with cultural diverse persons involved in law and mental health - cultural competency training manual","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Psychiatry","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Cultural competence; Stakeholder; Psychology; Mental health law; Presentation (obstetrics); Public relations; Nursing; Medical education; Medicine; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.1270833059226294,"score_gpt":0.35750380414728444,"score_spread":0.23042049822465505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058759980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24247085,0.0039583603,0.16411729,0.19858639,0.009163751,0.021849655,0.0009493475,0.0035071804,0.35539716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4083864,0.007232083,0.35720325,0.045887757,0.00197861,0.01942562,0.0013544103,0.0004091947,0.15812263],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951133,0.0024635887,0.0002618001,0.0001874212,0.0014783944,0.00049544574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922197,0.0037707915,0.00034328684,0.0006323433,0.0011872357,0.0018467569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009102254,0.0006331556,0.00036729898,0.00096819265,0.004494832,0.0015479788,0.0019156811,0.0024243814,0.010766665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009546721,0.00046837158,0.00035218114,0.00042266378,0.0023955524,0.00219785,0.007305066,0.0041388827,0.0029853599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006750294,0.0027933854,0.002345272,0.0011257026,0.0000067361807,0.0030949917,0.070343845,0.00079316826,0.0077936854,0.018557845,0.3585689,0.53450894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017165742,0.0012842925,0.01526645,0.0019763368,0.000010403712,0.008059556,0.071089335,0.0015058962,0.0038732658,0.014609998,0.88197935,0.00017340199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003754493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018099407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010766665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029264982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010898318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048137903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060698953","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2013.771123","title":"Is access to the profession access to justice? Lessons from Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Legal service; Perception; Political science; Representation (politics); White (mutation); Law; Public relations; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.12712855926517452,"score_gpt":0.5099555952967334,"score_spread":0.3828270360315589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060698953","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2988777,0.028678937,0.00045697184,0.46523067,0.0007544941,0.00016383355,0.0016724656,0.000042252283,0.20412274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94997025,0.019332008,0.00046076352,0.014436481,0.00013819241,0.000034678593,0.00031784843,0.00003075648,0.015278996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304396,0.0007014566,0.00015828559,0.0003723275,0.0016346291,0.004089387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98253137,0.003394459,0.0005555864,0.00023829364,0.008624278,0.004656036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004272553,0.00043140035,0.0009899838,0.0024348777,0.020136144,0.007799447,0.0027092772,0.0025285508,0.007955482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014181975,0.0003507262,0.0006221318,0.00616991,0.0076090517,0.004123651,0.0032277592,0.0043611065,0.0003385846],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005269261,0.00043416407,0.11209456,0.0018789303,0.0001756366,0.0049199583,0.19140613,0.0020018732,0.0008870176,0.20993157,0.2666394,0.20910385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012299033,0.00016256965,0.18232659,0.0038642983,0.00023790912,0.0006959127,0.43200654,0.0015429439,0.0004777803,0.026423847,0.35180965,0.00032893647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99901175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21587436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21587436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3392901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9094746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060830975","doi":"","title":"McGill University Archives - Pilarczyk's Picks Virtual Exhibit: Medals","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Visual arts; Computer graphics (images); Art","score_opus":0.02200565278619571,"score_gpt":0.2997714828986011,"score_spread":0.2777658301124054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060830975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09664571,0.0032237687,0.0020754423,0.035051797,0.0045333477,0.0005470433,0.009397373,0.0033985924,0.8451271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19215181,0.0010781692,0.0023855816,0.002100166,0.0005956596,0.00018054344,0.0017973818,0.000528039,0.7991827],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996346,0.00006446215,0.0000064383466,0.000025338815,0.00012415925,0.00014499598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987649,0.00016390794,0.000059807895,0.00015928222,0.00013924701,0.0007129431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009276015,0.00055078825,0.00025255248,0.0010846236,0.0079565765,0.0029658857,0.00089404685,0.0008870875,0.18018287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020554282,0.0003079914,0.00023410011,0.0009071702,0.0012053031,0.0012711944,0.0036957473,0.0018047713,0.019432396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010962532,0.00004198168,0.0007472686,0.000039412156,0.0000036522017,0.00023541493,0.0015932419,0.00006557229,0.00062616076,0.001907393,0.97766393,0.016966265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010428371,0.00003507456,0.00522513,0.00004473288,0.0000044238022,0.00012481335,0.0026172807,0.00009295256,0.0005924485,0.00024131154,0.99099267,0.00001876987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06384229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33584142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9361577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002746146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024109797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60277176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064886108","doi":"","title":"Mentor, Mercenary or Melding: An Empirical Enquiry into the Role of the Lawyer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Professional conduct; Law; Legal profession; Political science; Professional responsibility; Legal research; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04134244961920209,"score_gpt":0.4068493810439527,"score_spread":0.3655069314247506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064886108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9309122,0.0016682202,0.0011041235,0.020673562,0.000071711045,0.00007881508,0.000015414527,0.000008950661,0.045467075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954796,0.0005128716,0.0002246951,0.0008412497,0.000009958758,0.000017324594,0.0000042669576,0.000004958554,0.0029049932],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812323,0.013712738,0.00038018735,0.00077268993,0.002491062,0.0014110169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95159644,0.037604954,0.004156455,0.0011216431,0.0034879104,0.002032597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019734798,0.00023777058,0.00033671292,0.0015928122,0.012619386,0.009018689,0.0020885863,0.0028425949,0.0035301598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070166,0.00033762277,0.0001400803,0.0015430966,0.023848817,0.010677859,0.004203194,0.0036115216,0.0003146731],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029775196,0.00011302386,0.016639946,0.00010847353,0.000004752319,0.00042616154,0.9298315,0.000031502575,0.00018810265,0.036157824,0.0015619487,0.014907035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006290728,0.00003290487,0.006043031,0.00022355985,0.000005010257,0.000114696704,0.97804505,0.00009680682,0.00010957218,0.0013782401,0.0139374705,0.000007351184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06882226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14874652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06882226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012725786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018999368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13684332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065940923","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100008930","title":"Legal Scholarship in Ontario's English-speaking Common Law Schools","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02874366201158569,"score_gpt":0.29833404675810493,"score_spread":0.26959038474651925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065940923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69248384,0.0042564054,0.00046674654,0.03750002,0.00023595514,0.0002521696,0.0010071596,0.00007803867,0.26371968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8552883,0.0012860763,0.00035079187,0.0015633309,0.000059047055,0.00007854031,0.0001659473,0.000028235681,0.1411797],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946272,0.0005552056,0.00016991794,0.0005043888,0.0018066423,0.0023367137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980823,0.0034468754,0.0020930036,0.00070408493,0.0051750485,0.0077580004],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031058826,0.00024184145,0.00048345193,0.0032005464,0.028409854,0.0085910885,0.0015818329,0.0019115884,0.016722146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00897409,0.00047848697,0.00024101831,0.00743229,0.011461247,0.0018986019,0.005413143,0.0013029334,0.00090882514],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018248498,0.00019728256,0.15789293,0.00061221427,0.000037828377,0.0022319532,0.38608855,0.00034187836,0.0018037385,0.30413416,0.061083414,0.08539357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036413436,0.000052938605,0.2826179,0.00033593937,0.00002963193,0.00011124704,0.13084963,0.0002488162,0.00038981411,0.0036827137,0.58159554,0.000049455954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97159016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1704458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28383186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9621653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066096946","doi":"10.1080/00986281003626532","title":"The Influence of a Psychology and Law Class on Legal Attitudes and Knowledge Structures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching of Psychology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Psychology; Legal psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Class (philosophy); Social psychology; Legal education; School psychology; Biology and political orientation; Politics; Law; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.036278116319367136,"score_gpt":0.47375634528777155,"score_spread":0.43747822896840444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066096946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982987,0.000028763088,0.000015078149,0.00014894122,0.000012796512,0.0000065969875,0.000008227327,0.0000029098878,0.0014778976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981603,0.000035449404,0.000035948808,0.00008775829,0.000019759133,0.000008672525,0.000022450411,0.000003861453,0.0016257195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978556,0.00074294937,0.000070169204,0.00024500853,0.0005574956,0.0005287572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97800285,0.0075060837,0.002879679,0.0004913021,0.0009979871,0.01012213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017154857,0.0002942681,0.00037226346,0.0008040269,0.001792865,0.0026649106,0.0005954774,0.000816435,0.007221956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010589472,0.00026666443,0.0004326249,0.00038615506,0.0013692192,0.00046052074,0.0010637393,0.002143236,0.0007237901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042368723,0.03168504,0.8831143,0.000057157777,0.00022471033,0.0006074109,0.013303836,0.00044178072,0.01064919,0.0013571309,0.002405073,0.05191741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007452402,0.0013731623,0.9934135,0.00001635563,0.00003816324,0.000050623647,0.0026098953,0.00047439334,0.00084346125,0.00012389336,0.0009641917,0.000017777624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013918699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026357219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013918699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021597894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001820924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02767539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066837029","doi":"10.1017/s1472669600000797","title":"Local Law Society Libraries","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Yesterday; Law; Law library; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.024845781569686965,"score_gpt":0.3183662182499277,"score_spread":0.29352043668024075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066837029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012364618,0.003245181,0.0010728709,0.07469096,0.0018380292,0.00013834018,0.002223338,0.0031430312,0.9012837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020023221,0.00089996925,0.0005832457,0.007583544,0.00038210704,0.00005673018,0.0006134946,0.0003162695,0.96954143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894696,0.00020861615,0.000060312464,0.00018185086,0.00036181958,0.00024058126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957366,0.0005151302,0.00028175063,0.00039339645,0.0013545568,0.0017185818],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010521029,0.00032861184,0.0002907318,0.0013604409,0.009104457,0.009016355,0.0009609886,0.0027160882,0.4360094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004888005,0.00041693286,0.00025007085,0.0026986944,0.0017198772,0.0042810063,0.0033742369,0.0019822414,0.1481155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020010348,0.00004146841,0.0011151158,0.00009398596,0.000004617071,0.000252889,0.0013067531,0.000020236917,0.00025028337,0.008672343,0.9376253,0.050596897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028485042,0.000005889558,0.0009119517,0.000023822271,0.0000012723901,0.00005256189,0.0010172883,0.000013955634,0.00006246786,0.00035014184,0.99755234,0.0000054247635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030598419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08869458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4360094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005087166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008672722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8044641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067476155","doi":"10.1108/08880450310473135","title":"Managing library association finances, two scenarios: American Association of Law Libraries and the Metropolitan Toronto Lawyers Association","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Medical Association","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Metropolitan area; Trade association; Professional association; Accountability; Political science; Accounting; Business; Public administration; Management; Law; Medicine; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.013106348449456762,"score_gpt":0.2843996107897428,"score_spread":0.27129326234028606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067476155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42080343,0.0070615,0.0014507958,0.3841034,0.0006709029,0.00014345569,0.00036085103,0.000121819,0.18528388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.953293,0.0020287118,0.00068607996,0.0105143115,0.000190814,0.00006916805,0.0001247334,0.000021365762,0.033071853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946636,0.0015644872,0.00007986859,0.00018640551,0.0012088428,0.0022967267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915957,0.0016828201,0.000714619,0.00016566728,0.0008906653,0.004950595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048538875,0.0003182,0.00017220352,0.001440973,0.020596316,0.015563836,0.0011874529,0.0054437113,0.0076043396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0118154865,0.0005022139,0.0002503378,0.0025732424,0.007511818,0.006979843,0.005506717,0.0033116892,0.00045485236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033632971,0.00038336735,0.07341527,0.00018143021,0.000050590086,0.0077516083,0.11930036,0.0027369277,0.00060863496,0.39489326,0.3322914,0.06805079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020104021,0.00020946874,0.13890776,0.00028229077,0.00005461562,0.0008555722,0.2948749,0.0028066726,0.00058990216,0.020619355,0.5403919,0.00020646305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81419605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92213696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18580395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078678355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03865803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57085407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067783931","doi":"10.1353/utq.2006.0002","title":"The Dimensions of Ethics: An Introduction to Ethical Theory (review)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Morality; Relativism; Moral relativism; Normative ethics; Meta-ethics; Moral psychology; Cognitivism (psychology); Moral disengagement; Normative; Social cognitive theory of morality; Philosophy; Sociology; Information ethics; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020668506234466037,"score_gpt":0.32848338661056503,"score_spread":0.307814880376099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067783931","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000039403552,0.9862006,0.00031550584,0.00762539,0.0035673522,0.000043783417,0.000049304446,0.0000115577295,0.0021472266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006475643,0.9822649,0.0008133438,0.00806725,0.004248186,0.00014054803,0.00012874517,0.000013869806,0.0036756955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968792,0.0011820582,0.00046068145,0.00022326103,0.0010816804,0.00017307993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932221,0.0044773957,0.00066563016,0.00011148643,0.0012613523,0.00026205022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034970252,0.001572949,0.0023068683,0.007201342,0.0009577592,0.004929553,0.0016377814,0.0044138916,0.016834604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008929148,0.00091466156,0.0018058814,0.009451647,0.0024395532,0.008201594,0.00269244,0.0072605503,0.006977319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033452616,0.000055349105,0.0001962783,0.025072565,0.00010512564,0.00015429173,0.0004656217,0.0003485457,0.00029292802,0.014082751,0.61137366,0.3478194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013231287,0.00003452007,0.00073572947,0.029067753,0.000032023643,0.00055234414,0.0003204636,0.00007006042,0.000029839664,0.009474643,0.95964223,0.000027222028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030401726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061664023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016834604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037343574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006587996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05631739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W206993646","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.709324","title":"Tort Immunity for Nonprofit Volunteers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Immunity; Tort; Sovereign immunity; Business; Medicine; Political science; Law; Immunology; Liability; Immune system","score_opus":0.024002678573168054,"score_gpt":0.37048841862166787,"score_spread":0.3464857400484998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W206993646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3086311,0.0015464433,0.004043951,0.10717509,0.0018524297,0.0006279075,0.00042938162,0.00044777017,0.5752459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7827401,0.00040903836,0.00081201084,0.031179698,0.0010337613,0.00032361597,0.00022524458,0.00006977892,0.18320674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98950267,0.0026694168,0.0003981313,0.00073770044,0.0019674732,0.004724706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678747,0.0131519,0.002062859,0.0045557506,0.00464619,0.0077085337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010977822,0.00045910807,0.0009921532,0.001898339,0.00848084,0.0057692025,0.002457896,0.020343108,0.03404724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048544496,0.0006121317,0.0010996845,0.00064209895,0.0031030993,0.0028035666,0.006583747,0.0064192126,0.005446283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007986287,0.0016032865,0.07277305,0.0002052549,0.00013362154,0.00296831,0.009979227,0.00068039604,0.003297122,0.44728857,0.3379841,0.12228842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051016966,0.002602416,0.09554337,0.0014706602,0.0003528082,0.0077317967,0.016611034,0.0049152523,0.0044397055,0.16611119,0.69945765,0.00025409044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064523504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013901099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03404724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017362366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012138036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11389941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070748734","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v7n2p150","title":"The Defects of Anti-corruption Literature since 1990 and Revelation of the Legal Awareness in China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Language change; China; Prosperity; Taste; Political science; Meaning (existential); Subject (documents); Law; Aesthetics; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Literature; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.015839505564656967,"score_gpt":0.33572640104253604,"score_spread":0.3198868954778791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070748734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9053151,0.011763468,0.0002456413,0.043060753,0.0004064121,0.000027907037,0.00025829897,0.000037802896,0.038884576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99047613,0.0029887757,0.00014098003,0.0013497154,0.00019429675,0.000009652584,0.00010236581,0.000009051882,0.004728984],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977701,0.00033554327,0.00019949775,0.00025667762,0.0010034606,0.0004348373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893327,0.0026861485,0.0033570773,0.00082176895,0.002509431,0.0012928622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004529391,0.00021943098,0.00039277144,0.00550644,0.004894873,0.0045018597,0.0007549594,0.0013488213,0.0024031673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009514116,0.00029582283,0.00017884285,0.007616069,0.007772166,0.0046602585,0.0021894919,0.0019959784,0.0001340896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016822087,0.0001312235,0.1575119,0.001187232,0.000079017795,0.0041579893,0.43928394,0.0004341207,0.0031681464,0.20837392,0.037653703,0.14785057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002513576,0.00012394409,0.61817145,0.0009446212,0.000071815135,0.0013720179,0.06825276,0.00078558957,0.0020882154,0.014246804,0.2937647,0.00015295815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0690709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07808741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0690709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008947987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013542414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13733774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070837081","doi":"10.7202/1027712ar","title":"Impacts des profils professionnels sur la formation juridique au Québec : d’aujourd’hui à hier","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032938774099105686,"score_gpt":0.32526912945273884,"score_spread":0.29233035535363316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070837081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8506214,0.007792244,0.0012497528,0.03939903,0.00030334794,0.00012898879,0.0012277424,0.000058499543,0.09921897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95829767,0.0021082363,0.00041807324,0.001357546,0.000039871204,0.00005076256,0.00017528547,0.000020446885,0.037532087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996965,0.00059899525,0.00007510529,0.00026196675,0.0009939133,0.0011049969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912698,0.0013446719,0.0009085006,0.00022683549,0.004411369,0.0018388497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026891155,0.00023983362,0.00035386306,0.002308121,0.013791855,0.00635364,0.0013207084,0.0010313902,0.018925667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008143528,0.00029562094,0.00026349747,0.003505447,0.0065212324,0.002121274,0.003210419,0.0022643306,0.00064262917],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002047754,0.0001489455,0.39254498,0.0006908692,0.00011071356,0.0010312039,0.31756246,0.0010389042,0.0021740252,0.091657594,0.036138345,0.1566971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000128720385,0.00006341861,0.62767464,0.0007737807,0.000038608734,0.00009792536,0.17638522,0.000351976,0.00053159235,0.0018506479,0.19212003,0.00009921601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99614346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9072086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09279137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10578162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6732516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074135593","doi":"10.1017/s1472669614000395","title":"A ‘Charity’ Case in Point","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Point (geometry); Political science","score_opus":0.020086052457783117,"score_gpt":0.3397234214502975,"score_spread":0.3196373689925144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074135593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088833176,0.002633357,0.004194578,0.2920937,0.00370363,0.00011299004,0.00008580538,0.0001379145,0.60820484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8485554,0.0011226585,0.0009769759,0.053183537,0.0015415628,0.00008403738,0.000037897003,0.00006611858,0.09443172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99365133,0.0023630406,0.0001392507,0.00072254543,0.0010879807,0.0020358125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994017,0.0023903328,0.00047947242,0.00045101924,0.0007069514,0.001955242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045657842,0.0003228764,0.0005046988,0.0019713447,0.024048684,0.0072434233,0.0016352517,0.013228977,0.019001635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014498917,0.00042085134,0.00070659746,0.0021090826,0.017856454,0.005324348,0.009439112,0.017962921,0.0024636292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043759173,0.00008289093,0.0032288062,0.00008337312,0.000017099002,0.04645536,0.04643829,0.00022678905,0.00021785701,0.7740845,0.116361186,0.012760158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002625944,0.00006917774,0.0015148693,0.0005859647,0.000025223537,0.04655907,0.060469218,0.0004890972,0.00038637785,0.11754849,0.77223724,0.00008895314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010741535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019043649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024048684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005673385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049152873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063566804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080105138","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2008.9959788","title":"Legal education's mission","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal education; Legal education; Scholarship; Political science; Diversity (politics); Liberal democracy; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Higher education; Liberal arts education; Politics","score_opus":0.0714253491952251,"score_gpt":0.39607574564848375,"score_spread":0.32465039645325866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080105138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042476673,0.011866091,0.0023701629,0.62891096,0.0064265584,0.000029117185,0.000068613685,0.00013493562,0.3459459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3488949,0.015472697,0.0047531645,0.25240183,0.010214104,0.00011760178,0.00015068807,0.00014289914,0.36785212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959122,0.0014236227,0.00012928362,0.00044479812,0.0012154069,0.00087479805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99199075,0.0016491602,0.00033455843,0.00050113455,0.0014089767,0.0041154665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006838698,0.00034237813,0.00037353844,0.0012833299,0.006774947,0.00825738,0.00081075967,0.0069510196,0.01684069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077618435,0.00016945535,0.00028085825,0.00062314415,0.009598916,0.004728115,0.0076859817,0.013637912,0.0037668417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001050675,0.000075078235,0.00032573147,0.000080122445,0.0000031950342,0.00006673655,0.0020298243,0.00010530722,0.00012034331,0.78608876,0.1558915,0.05520291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065938257,0.000023758666,0.0004669558,0.00021578003,0.0000015545149,0.000096042175,0.00084724766,0.000091283146,0.0000809375,0.06344683,0.93471676,0.0000061685996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060081896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062746163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01684069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004436062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023777237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056337714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085125841","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2013.1.6","title":"The Copyright Modernization Act: A Guide for Post-Secondary Instructors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Modernization theory; Jurisprudence; Fair use; Sociology; Political science; Work (physics); The Internet; Public relations; Humanities; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.036761741843121,"score_gpt":0.35370091944197546,"score_spread":0.3169391775988545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085125841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011347203,0.029983977,0.056309737,0.16860081,0.0065350877,0.006960603,0.0035271863,0.005307142,0.7114283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038257632,0.040815044,0.092185184,0.052807543,0.0016117695,0.0063430443,0.003127688,0.0017919354,0.76306015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906735,0.0028828476,0.0010112078,0.0004085645,0.0041665668,0.0008573943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98629504,0.0048469026,0.0009362454,0.0009120309,0.0055112196,0.0014985334],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012002684,0.0010656238,0.0006938378,0.0033594654,0.006645682,0.008202401,0.0019927942,0.008098566,0.018045919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022723436,0.0014841286,0.00046292582,0.0034534957,0.004484611,0.008179256,0.0028403238,0.008195651,0.024308579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014780119,0.00014812779,0.0011158944,0.00018722196,0.0000018637398,0.0004610538,0.009702163,0.00020508944,0.00116576,0.025083715,0.77577573,0.18613862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003667378,0.0000151037675,0.00066353165,0.00020097128,7.981317e-7,0.0000843341,0.0019148249,0.000059598795,0.000110992274,0.0020382341,0.9948906,0.00001734232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08553529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16451126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00814698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04342744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17007482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087773398","doi":"10.1017/cls.2014.1","title":"Legal Inquiry: A Liberal Arts Experiment in Demystifying Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal arts education; Vocabulary; The arts; Legal education; Law; Sociology; Legal profession; Critical thinking; Political science; Pedagogy; Higher education; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045078839757631106,"score_gpt":0.342730155533635,"score_spread":0.2976513157760039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087773398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.964784,0.00006434818,0.0023518314,0.004714425,0.00013551813,0.0016208211,0.00010060869,0.00007349439,0.026155047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97231364,0.00009910992,0.008517256,0.0031768768,0.00007909075,0.004780204,0.00012428206,0.000042254687,0.010867317],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98243964,0.012037708,0.00057258806,0.0011892928,0.0022322913,0.0015284378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93693244,0.046187937,0.0032806292,0.0040260465,0.0024957818,0.0070772576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022270082,0.00073370145,0.000904267,0.0014169551,0.009364862,0.006610854,0.0034237937,0.0049297446,0.017748816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039325945,0.0007900444,0.000552879,0.0010548015,0.013511917,0.0062542264,0.008148425,0.009001365,0.0018440263],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0121764215,0.17950714,0.014380402,0.0008553144,0.000077068355,0.002530897,0.5324723,0.0019612503,0.02064389,0.14176424,0.016712094,0.07691894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02207426,0.07915005,0.04026399,0.0008790701,0.00015167409,0.001385804,0.36522815,0.014097533,0.027849354,0.21256977,0.23570326,0.0006470511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026123319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003942745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022270082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003766804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047529098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11777687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W208836607","doi":"","title":"26. All That Glitters Is Not Gold: The False Promise of Victim Impact Statements","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Harm; Criminology; Criminal justice; Dignity; Autonomy; Skepticism; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Political science; Culpability; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.08439172441855633,"score_gpt":0.4140174841036777,"score_spread":0.3296257596851214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W208836607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030349135,0.0096127745,0.008748279,0.42963153,0.0044697993,0.00004873666,0.0000751972,0.00018552263,0.5168791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7750369,0.0035916406,0.004365244,0.10343693,0.0028040726,0.00012879829,0.000043375563,0.00022297198,0.11036996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861244,0.0076345108,0.00048605324,0.0015935818,0.0029122685,0.0012491066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812617,0.0130290305,0.0008323757,0.0018090829,0.002452093,0.000615776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014823269,0.00047224702,0.0006420506,0.0007687851,0.009730479,0.012301782,0.0019677794,0.009444775,0.004052151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03010369,0.0004663955,0.0005261014,0.00038370964,0.048870146,0.010598723,0.006084742,0.016035166,0.0018880607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015900901,0.000008240206,0.00025795473,0.000043319615,0.0000083213,0.00021218254,0.016223576,0.00009327671,0.00017226282,0.94231087,0.028364379,0.012289662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003076514,0.000080191894,0.0010073791,0.0006724241,0.00003141498,0.00045343328,0.025775274,0.00032710226,0.0013565287,0.44909126,0.5210837,0.00009057015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008357675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012896212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014823269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038626406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049073356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07839388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089150328","doi":"10.1080/03050710902726931","title":"Provincial law reform agencies in Canada: are they really that different from the Scottish Law Commission?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Mandate; Political science; Law reform; Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Public administration; State (computer science); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04327491989774831,"score_gpt":0.31085825604174966,"score_spread":0.26758333614400137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089150328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09294433,0.02311497,0.0018252847,0.6575386,0.0020198512,0.000120465345,0.0005831674,0.0001477141,0.22170568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85689,0.012133434,0.0025074158,0.06030087,0.00040425826,0.00005726568,0.0003235974,0.00008667559,0.06729645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.984909,0.0013340566,0.000193446,0.0007223426,0.005699954,0.007141157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985844,0.0012911322,0.0008807629,0.00030166327,0.0044753044,0.007207173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042161103,0.00026056526,0.00044022547,0.0020590043,0.029002678,0.014818215,0.0018793028,0.004414135,0.0060312664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017241146,0.00048198798,0.00043526714,0.005421688,0.0137832705,0.0045085405,0.004396542,0.0054992195,0.00051098823],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008203022,0.00006968164,0.029739426,0.00034568238,0.000051699066,0.00079151674,0.04091221,0.0006109171,0.00043494,0.51384246,0.3053543,0.10776506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036785725,0.000033492954,0.04310127,0.00052806135,0.00004657812,0.00018473057,0.047140162,0.0005278362,0.0002599235,0.0146551635,0.8933585,0.00012741481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76876265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23123734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4750928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89165574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089800841","doi":"10.3138/cjls.26.2.227","title":"Introduction: The Disenchantment of Critical Legal Thought?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology of law; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Jurisprudence; Legal realism; Sociology; Law; Legal science; Normative; Legal positivism; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03536358666149566,"score_gpt":0.3180967834247978,"score_spread":0.28273319676330216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089800841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016785413,0.08017536,0.0050196983,0.8217986,0.018072426,0.000022332568,0.00012441515,0.00008112534,0.07302744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2769631,0.12124066,0.009004243,0.36792535,0.14345041,0.00035588516,0.00042773227,0.0007667165,0.0798659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99273854,0.004282291,0.00018614519,0.0010823925,0.001262257,0.00044832315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9666843,0.026732484,0.00092001323,0.0012681291,0.0028575181,0.0015374179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00954871,0.0008971303,0.0010125296,0.003214065,0.008911707,0.020182109,0.002904272,0.009475768,0.014868599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029496705,0.00045097969,0.0007510043,0.0036221102,0.033885777,0.02163378,0.0050581023,0.01424281,0.0026108862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013753067,0.000008751783,0.00007442187,0.00018896362,0.0000032777461,0.000036312234,0.0069752387,0.000055275,0.00003180558,0.8443494,0.13869146,0.009571276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011464589,0.000008265199,0.00013133648,0.0009238711,0.000003019732,0.000065934095,0.0042814068,0.00023123357,0.000043374614,0.50255644,0.49173024,0.000013289775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065621664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055433204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9934378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010872918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077480953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07888889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091752406","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2001.tb00167.x","title":"Casaubon's ghosts: the haunting of legal scholarship","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal formalism; Mainstream; Legal realism; Law; Pride; Political science; Sociology; Legal profession; Comparative law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.13637137564472432,"score_gpt":0.456736296431363,"score_spread":0.3203649207866387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091752406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010256322,0.027067881,0.0022423468,0.8553537,0.0062067565,0.000015029334,0.000033024717,0.00012461044,0.09870035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69219863,0.025918394,0.009034702,0.16630696,0.007819658,0.00014595292,0.000055386914,0.00040877605,0.09811151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988468,0.0067823566,0.00025216988,0.0009623052,0.0025104259,0.0010247378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970831,0.017563816,0.0011291145,0.0025922975,0.0032428298,0.004641021],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0146660665,0.00038986842,0.00089264533,0.003123313,0.029336091,0.022914447,0.0019285089,0.011979985,0.008306782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038452316,0.00041417987,0.00052536343,0.0036576581,0.05648579,0.019012945,0.010223467,0.014153152,0.0013569677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022603968,0.000009986467,0.0001970011,0.00008040696,0.0000040656905,0.00016588398,0.017167633,0.00007800343,0.000037450234,0.84970844,0.11290292,0.019625578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016563923,0.000012512576,0.00022487859,0.00048040572,0.0000042703805,0.00027341154,0.014445783,0.00023556624,0.00006639163,0.2909653,0.6932522,0.000022829065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04682504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08820636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9706639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022531012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03144377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16347468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091934849","doi":"10.1177/000494410504900208","title":"‘Silly, Soft and Otherwise Suspect’: Doctoral Education as Risky Business","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Rigour; Corporate governance; Relation (database); False accusation; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Law; Criminology; Media studies; Management; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.043673220688284047,"score_gpt":0.41154999536347653,"score_spread":0.3678767746751925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091934849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51744723,0.0051593245,0.011635579,0.16796148,0.00059019774,0.000068204994,0.00002668344,0.0000669055,0.29704443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903532,0.0007929835,0.0005068025,0.0032990463,0.0001593575,0.000021455318,0.0000049569862,0.000013328454,0.004848856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9668232,0.02356389,0.0006787943,0.0017021376,0.0049435664,0.0022883182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91708803,0.058842238,0.0115000345,0.004504112,0.0033650296,0.0047004633],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025045784,0.00028622246,0.00045367196,0.0030085219,0.018739691,0.021853862,0.001467386,0.008929452,0.004989963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0696644,0.0005294184,0.000416847,0.0019822074,0.08633307,0.01693547,0.017277151,0.010542458,0.0005290093],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004526079,0.000056229637,0.0072839223,0.00010428648,0.0000117968075,0.0006595026,0.26955387,0.0002064762,0.00034756557,0.69494635,0.0049281744,0.021856511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032601027,0.000165156,0.018630203,0.0013128989,0.00003329057,0.0013554543,0.3613065,0.0011875315,0.001324179,0.40061045,0.21389638,0.0001454023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056744074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008003596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076015186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008620188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13245636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094997892","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0024","title":"My Continuing Legal Education","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Nothing; Banner; Legal education; Law; Media studies; History; Political science; Sociology; Art history; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012600813934692104,"score_gpt":0.30020376384300207,"score_spread":0.28760294990831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094997892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002071968,0.02458915,0.0023105305,0.3188845,0.0641106,0.00034553488,0.0010681187,0.00065071177,0.5859689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010000527,0.012782539,0.0020238422,0.05448162,0.02419485,0.00040033608,0.0008550127,0.0002121647,0.8950491],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776125,0.00047171814,0.00015503356,0.0003408698,0.0008934848,0.000377615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99163014,0.0007213659,0.00036243838,0.00036589516,0.0019398894,0.0049802572],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024773981,0.0005746539,0.0005574814,0.0014294419,0.003331168,0.006674841,0.0017677088,0.006033774,0.3132579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01387452,0.0003028241,0.00045907457,0.0010149799,0.0014355308,0.0044364138,0.0069762715,0.007813874,0.13504425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005881183,0.000048605303,0.00019304441,0.00007941665,9.2756915e-7,0.00014508386,0.00026741537,0.000014903088,0.00008852236,0.0051971045,0.9047983,0.08916073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023387524,0.000007559909,0.00013455877,0.00013468342,3.9496908e-7,0.00013838928,0.000119723445,0.00001260447,0.000018660383,0.00083830976,0.9985904,0.0000023575517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018782977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044608414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3132579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024307093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007961411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97955424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095394123","doi":"10.1006/ijsl.2001.0148","title":"Lay Knowledge of Courts in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Sociology of Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisdiction; Law; Institution; Nothing; Political science; Dispute resolution; Sociology; Public institution","score_opus":0.04197494445587836,"score_gpt":0.4016116980051777,"score_spread":0.35963675354929936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095394123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8042698,0.0068504084,0.000519623,0.085563906,0.00021460715,0.00009214193,0.0023311686,0.000027712551,0.10013069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98338324,0.0021549098,0.00017543895,0.0018259682,0.000049548056,0.000014679336,0.00038160695,0.000011118917,0.012003496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941386,0.00070092647,0.00021540439,0.00037911226,0.002577924,0.0019879923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95801735,0.013439377,0.0029041802,0.00082579587,0.017164914,0.007648264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035254285,0.00022788832,0.0006966149,0.004537984,0.01693635,0.0075686513,0.0028205253,0.0026631039,0.018381216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035748903,0.0005802847,0.0004077717,0.0067872414,0.0050625247,0.0023907823,0.0028806236,0.005178307,0.00048544983],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004383159,0.00079133816,0.40371686,0.00067178736,0.0002113368,0.0028976647,0.18232633,0.0039450782,0.0006358444,0.1722511,0.094641306,0.13747312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109130015,0.00012698637,0.65352166,0.0015827467,0.00017017791,0.00045904593,0.14906313,0.0039907387,0.0006143633,0.020889064,0.16924037,0.00023264847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99812406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99918133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13530561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13530561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98171556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096119495","doi":"","title":"A Joint Initiative of Community Foundations of Canada and the Law Commission of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Joint (building); Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.06393039256607216,"score_gpt":0.33773940678921066,"score_spread":0.2738090142231385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096119495","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035310682,0.0066185407,0.0045909965,0.8420148,0.012713217,0.0016934224,0.002068251,0.00039737803,0.09459269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26392975,0.0038093335,0.013148368,0.13460316,0.0013562781,0.0006184282,0.0013261745,0.00017243247,0.5810361],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735555,0.0023753499,0.00051331904,0.0014587748,0.011480501,0.010616588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87385195,0.007781392,0.0020467145,0.0016873856,0.049437877,0.06519463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017313972,0.00062410464,0.0009852007,0.0041199266,0.018216997,0.011556478,0.0032260735,0.015858104,0.020824403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029163118,0.00094200636,0.0010607288,0.0025467507,0.0040293136,0.0031008257,0.007061384,0.009839769,0.000995194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022690021,0.00035906426,0.008526121,0.00032932905,0.00008104639,0.00088539755,0.0018333709,0.0009111062,0.0012359519,0.0850854,0.8680089,0.032517366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020281185,0.000095501506,0.02064787,0.0003330521,0.00006272789,0.0001578961,0.0071573663,0.001920443,0.0005765149,0.006009366,0.9627167,0.000119702585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9527423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8999003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10009969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.60083383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7262775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096436924","doi":"10.1017/s1472669606000387","title":"Researching European Law – a Basic Introduction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Law; Library science; Basis (linear algebra); Political science; Law library; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01921464535844978,"score_gpt":0.32694611449563976,"score_spread":0.30773146913718996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096436924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006812099,0.2660128,0.054383546,0.06574759,0.004920849,0.00016753838,0.00056386157,0.00013539364,0.6012563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25433424,0.41127047,0.060261086,0.03891727,0.017012522,0.0007488673,0.0017892905,0.00037037994,0.21529596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984267,0.0007514189,0.0001367135,0.00022945102,0.00026693172,0.00018872434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893564,0.0006689618,0.00006330006,0.00012959438,0.00013209484,0.00007042149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003050083,0.0009157512,0.0008703873,0.0035583696,0.002737037,0.0071832966,0.0010415358,0.0059651188,0.014840187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024302423,0.0005444984,0.000772189,0.004775111,0.0072390083,0.014572783,0.0028915242,0.0035422645,0.0035600169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058903565,0.000038089274,0.0001637099,0.00012999756,0.000004074912,0.00006287194,0.000653241,0.0001906388,0.00011178524,0.9628344,0.008706052,0.027099175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000488596,0.00004154393,0.0006056537,0.00065397343,0.0000029469077,0.00018955363,0.00065840303,0.0001979806,0.00012645226,0.4976359,0.49986932,0.000013410512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022680126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019163194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014840187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030594696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015817342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049645364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101512610","doi":"10.1017/s1472669603001051","title":"Law Librarianship in Bermuda; or Even If You're On an Island, No Man Is an Island","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Plan (archaeology); Master plan; Slipping; History; Law; Political science; Library science; Management; Archaeology; Engineering; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.044614564305093536,"score_gpt":0.3446729922761716,"score_spread":0.30005842797107807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101512610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07500992,0.11788996,0.00049379835,0.10727382,0.006530116,0.00008271155,0.0018414347,0.000713999,0.6901642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15436995,0.013730041,0.0009767066,0.0053434675,0.00057744107,0.000022474129,0.00050077384,0.000115504954,0.82436365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987425,0.0002465573,0.000086229265,0.00025856038,0.00031067547,0.00035558466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958496,0.000526136,0.00063609093,0.00024228918,0.0009875377,0.0017583539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013476196,0.00029908636,0.00041728432,0.0010611033,0.00833447,0.005687754,0.00053766114,0.0019583176,0.104729965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032209652,0.00038632078,0.00012164566,0.0022750327,0.0018926734,0.0025787225,0.0018776765,0.0013345808,0.021474784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010448961,0.0000977421,0.0119331395,0.0009575004,0.000016952648,0.0012155185,0.005739658,0.00008131593,0.0010710582,0.014171818,0.7603298,0.20428099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070562105,0.000016554231,0.023239182,0.00022034264,0.000004022985,0.00028551056,0.0026148236,0.000022053362,0.00020233434,0.00021861166,0.97315896,0.000010422319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11529962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36825627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11529962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009420279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013506413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35035664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103321676","doi":"","title":"Improving Stability and Performance of an International Network of Free Access Legal Information Systems","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of information, law and technology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Legal research; Business; Internationalization; Public relations; Political science; Law; International trade","score_opus":0.013745942977514851,"score_gpt":0.3139568863922164,"score_spread":0.30021094341470156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103321676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9056958,0.000593448,0.05122222,0.00344238,0.00023378822,0.00029286387,0.0006575103,0.0020212482,0.035840683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918602,0.000073159026,0.0059925104,0.000057366255,0.000032944365,0.000046583667,0.0004011356,0.00006346742,0.0014725456],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915801,0.0034889919,0.00046141451,0.0015762612,0.0019668918,0.0009264078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95272064,0.021237988,0.0056012915,0.007026213,0.009721869,0.0036919606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017548317,0.00051609246,0.00058302144,0.0040374487,0.0027028928,0.006501355,0.0019207087,0.0015217381,0.0076891608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06590786,0.00035221758,0.0003778637,0.0029012426,0.0024325948,0.008540946,0.0050144577,0.0015122591,0.0012212563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023270885,0.0011447435,0.13927966,0.00027445925,0.000240498,0.00043398995,0.0044159326,0.48046678,0.007957864,0.11248268,0.019817438,0.23115882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009977607,0.0006829651,0.014673058,0.00006371713,0.000065064436,0.00012223002,0.001662141,0.9419658,0.005258888,0.02381873,0.011535389,0.00005221034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012116739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051190816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017548317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004283644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020859009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092805505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103977024","doi":"10.53300/001c.6177","title":"Australian Law Students’ Values: How They Impact on Ethical Behaviour","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Equity (law); Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Project commissioning; Resource (disambiguation); Law; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Publishing; Public administration","score_opus":0.0647866432713611,"score_gpt":0.5082380481448364,"score_spread":0.44345140487347534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103977024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85839826,0.0011115327,0.000927966,0.022290442,0.00015375392,0.00005550666,0.000037089976,0.0000119928745,0.11701336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99307466,0.00045486665,0.00024108695,0.00096800167,0.000013861111,0.000016717491,0.000010043221,0.0000067858427,0.005213981],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866585,0.00733295,0.00022354542,0.00048815768,0.0038440616,0.001452816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98542017,0.00448056,0.0027593242,0.0005466881,0.0031983226,0.0035950176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008513404,0.00020332613,0.00042282496,0.001677748,0.0049847714,0.008214816,0.0009812402,0.0016940573,0.00653211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030078908,0.00027235708,0.00030527383,0.0016623614,0.0075181415,0.0023237858,0.0059413877,0.0038432633,0.00065861735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009848535,0.0007876766,0.18086989,0.00021364824,0.000096409756,0.0009104919,0.5218013,0.00026447748,0.00083379896,0.11278789,0.014050444,0.16728549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036927348,0.00040132317,0.44131732,0.00051521213,0.00009299856,0.00051997276,0.39115477,0.001154017,0.00064434164,0.063121274,0.10093237,0.000109457935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04972115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08266905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04972115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00793188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007721745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09886348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104367869","doi":"10.5539/hes.v1n2p73","title":"On Cultivation of Characteristic Talents in Law in Institutes of Technology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Competition (biology); Face (sociological concept); Resource (disambiguation); Law; Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Sociology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.15574575432462687,"score_gpt":0.4454658073598526,"score_spread":0.28972005303522574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104367869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8266745,0.0014563942,0.005214954,0.0051294537,0.000025847865,0.000052372918,0.000030314646,0.000014604573,0.16140148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997359,0.000732934,0.00059260917,0.00009750506,0.000011150916,0.000009180869,0.0000069739935,9.3492974e-7,0.001189684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986564,0.0005562156,0.000037741236,0.00012634219,0.00027729498,0.00034608564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659795,0.0016665496,0.00067478593,0.00023455017,0.0004212834,0.0004049349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020035773,0.00015823451,0.00013692623,0.0017237352,0.0025025262,0.0032051909,0.00040650854,0.0005537856,0.0021405679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027786198,0.000080654616,0.00021897785,0.0022757254,0.0062281326,0.0022731286,0.0023461338,0.00059905666,0.00013884556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008118482,0.00028061017,0.0822035,0.00019534043,0.000015693013,0.00072213786,0.015851963,0.00093866914,0.0035299412,0.8026013,0.0010992915,0.09248029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043490854,0.00092434016,0.48413336,0.0007745689,0.00011357364,0.0010426394,0.04913927,0.0049030045,0.012532183,0.3695808,0.076689936,0.0001229117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023746633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056244484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042315554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042315554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004013199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030702233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105190709","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12060","title":"Controversy about the Role of Children's Lawyers: Advocate or Best Interests Guardian? Comparing Practices in Two Canadian Jurisdictions with Different Policies for Lawyers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Citation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06301285000555393,"score_gpt":0.4044794314693569,"score_spread":0.34146658146380293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105190709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892083,0.0005725559,0.00008393899,0.004759168,0.000017614379,0.00003483459,0.0000421887,0.000005392974,0.0052759326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974076,0.00045582818,0.00018613119,0.0009078151,0.0000048035163,0.000015964804,0.000026150623,0.000005143586,0.0009906819],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878848,0.0028608066,0.0004988643,0.00093271205,0.0035328066,0.0042899475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771294,0.0067700096,0.0046270555,0.00053668924,0.0052003935,0.0057364563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008006906,0.00024455017,0.0005827109,0.0021951809,0.028313892,0.007161009,0.0029269336,0.0020240615,0.0023192698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030342989,0.00070734735,0.00033203053,0.0034958988,0.013402399,0.0021318914,0.0045684073,0.0032097292,0.00015711023],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063066764,0.00005729909,0.09161499,0.000087971835,0.000014932856,0.0005983129,0.8904229,0.000051672443,0.0007375073,0.0024858539,0.0015826258,0.012282907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007118438,0.00003213206,0.06734265,0.00010495833,0.000009974972,0.000113008675,0.92574817,0.000036689173,0.0001187483,0.00012609446,0.006335085,0.000025352412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9784418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.099365704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12678799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72095203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106245212","doi":"","title":"Should legal professional privilege be limited to exclude in-house lawyers under South African criminal law? : comment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Legal profession; Common law; Criminal law","score_opus":0.1794632987499983,"score_gpt":0.3903842138655562,"score_spread":0.2109209151155579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106245212","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002253856,0.00032561526,0.00021306686,0.9900115,0.0018759462,0.000020367048,0.0000773193,0.000030335123,0.005192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011205881,0.00025927147,0.00020742885,0.9833876,0.0018822482,0.00003736168,0.000017203074,0.000015046113,0.0029880665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215937,0.0013552837,0.00073942076,0.0020773853,0.0019372688,0.001731374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96517235,0.025595473,0.001994372,0.001157342,0.0041018585,0.001978552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014225869,0.00065760536,0.0011428811,0.00068496045,0.011917565,0.004517729,0.008120226,0.0930515,0.011212865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044425562,0.0010925464,0.002063251,0.0013565671,0.013254036,0.010405594,0.006319084,0.056472626,0.003806593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011672064,0.000058208494,0.0028687823,0.00028583815,0.000037927413,0.00217519,0.01356336,0.00019742204,0.0010116653,0.086629264,0.8870364,0.0060191723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023691924,0.00015631416,0.010873925,0.0013161597,0.0001448279,0.002554956,0.036661893,0.0007700754,0.002271534,0.0573343,0.88727975,0.00039935845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08605102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12896691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0930515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006501346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015735634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17110032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W210677777","doi":"","title":"Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Legal Education in Pakistan: A Quest for Innovation in Study of Law to Mend Attitudes of Law Professionals Towards Litigants","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Therapeutic jurisprudence; Law; Economic Justice; Magistrate; Legal education; Jurisprudence; Political science; Drug court; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05206838489192681,"score_gpt":0.4699135574155476,"score_spread":0.41784517252362074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W210677777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46871954,0.11223847,0.003154544,0.32474056,0.0015526076,0.0002884013,0.00018890672,0.00003868361,0.08907833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93886375,0.042610884,0.001863741,0.011457973,0.00071967015,0.00005718004,0.00004293305,0.0000071076083,0.0043766852],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702626,0.0011666742,0.00019145099,0.0002926345,0.00076464727,0.00055838696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98943055,0.0058856583,0.0014500924,0.0002584173,0.0017357799,0.0012395333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051405258,0.00021856691,0.00047929265,0.0022893331,0.0059284666,0.004946169,0.0009545011,0.0019666203,0.004908614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086889425,0.00026690634,0.0002382694,0.004764719,0.007974844,0.0063937646,0.0022127505,0.0031817197,0.00029382212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014328277,0.0022217683,0.09004718,0.0036548832,0.000031898955,0.0034863134,0.20179309,0.00038729832,0.00175971,0.25570112,0.01694744,0.42382598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114378105,0.0012547043,0.22558612,0.0073172394,0.0000663917,0.004561921,0.38615713,0.0014149556,0.0016135201,0.05683708,0.3149055,0.00017101839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056684878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052420836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056684878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009376432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039008368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11270988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106932878","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2014.885317","title":"Medical-Legal Partnership in Medical Education: Pathways and Opportunities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Medicine","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Family Medicine","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Political science; Medicine; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.1029641662165741,"score_gpt":0.4159105471434145,"score_spread":0.3129463809268404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106932878","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013415447,0.011068521,0.0037656,0.8972128,0.0019998874,0.00009171361,0.000046648813,0.000083143845,0.0723162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8530418,0.016601933,0.012681522,0.07369623,0.002231119,0.00042831557,0.00010063948,0.00010540531,0.04111301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747731,0.015292211,0.0004865844,0.0008073837,0.0022468911,0.006393833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9433406,0.010222277,0.001886929,0.0009422947,0.0025781428,0.041029837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028138418,0.00039591262,0.0003202259,0.0017582573,0.018177025,0.022350654,0.0018298372,0.01286867,0.02422113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028501354,0.0006503357,0.00040914075,0.0018576735,0.016137347,0.03667082,0.033117555,0.017186541,0.0028493053],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080180034,0.00058498594,0.0048468094,0.00038391032,0.0000085225165,0.0010980638,0.026196731,0.00018035449,0.00010811363,0.71735156,0.12629673,0.122863986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007497711,0.0002419962,0.004016108,0.002138954,0.0000060981283,0.0015307977,0.09010087,0.0006174632,0.00020304997,0.42175362,0.47923303,0.000083055915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056783906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014901945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028138418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011088484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.063559204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14881194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107390922","doi":"10.7448/ias.16.3.18726","title":"Access to justice: evaluating law, health and human rights programmes in Kenya","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research","funders":"Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Medicine; Human rights; Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Environmental health; Political science","score_opus":0.10084516518324158,"score_gpt":0.49896489135303407,"score_spread":0.3981197261697925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107390922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9497726,0.0018082135,0.0014181879,0.00096152915,0.000057382076,0.027794229,0.0013491786,0.0000318917,0.016806742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656672,0.0013996736,0.012198639,0.00024901115,0.000030295896,0.018677032,0.0008916522,0.000010051124,0.0008764457],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94566923,0.038404368,0.0040495493,0.0009933582,0.0073712724,0.0035121783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9473699,0.02789434,0.010295544,0.0012970546,0.009398834,0.0037443638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05894797,0.00121263,0.0011940297,0.0040177144,0.0035401764,0.0040858183,0.0021643434,0.0017057745,0.0061897687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06313494,0.0006629586,0.0018629283,0.004425236,0.0030678282,0.0044134245,0.0047969106,0.0016805409,0.0003804688],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020873923,0.061696656,0.2740247,0.025453918,0.002309381,0.0017335222,0.03677275,0.024712592,0.003678588,0.013269168,0.004643391,0.53083134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01019077,0.17835054,0.6260783,0.016062247,0.0046343557,0.00058649346,0.092437156,0.01928901,0.015215718,0.0057592327,0.030871743,0.0005244319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027718406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051906154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05894797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023194127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025555355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31175035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108347716","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1483","title":"Securing Accountability through Commissions of Inquiry: A Role for the Law Commission of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Public administration; Discretion; Accountability; Law; Incentive; Political science; Government (linguistics); Politics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.08394092837190328,"score_gpt":0.39724349330661224,"score_spread":0.313302564934709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108347716","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059328835,0.012152108,0.010681055,0.7370881,0.0029298705,0.00029055012,0.00011609099,0.0002772983,0.177136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8764456,0.006012788,0.008770265,0.06223556,0.00055939,0.0001381891,0.000071397626,0.00014662533,0.045620274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9631581,0.010163142,0.00073880877,0.0022234903,0.010018534,0.013697932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9045707,0.028565116,0.0054674484,0.0030713426,0.028192826,0.030132588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027527736,0.00040836475,0.00048410372,0.0025535831,0.040473558,0.027154325,0.0032035245,0.011678971,0.004282822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071342856,0.00081626535,0.00051773293,0.0031587337,0.02494467,0.008953698,0.00856995,0.010266926,0.0003901532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008305472,0.000076670054,0.014786481,0.00021037519,0.00003746266,0.00085529056,0.035036746,0.0016619455,0.00051668775,0.7151277,0.16231985,0.06928783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010443505,0.00006767404,0.01430467,0.00076595315,0.000095465,0.00021307553,0.040297452,0.0033171102,0.00083079224,0.05337346,0.8863374,0.00029259102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9794388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83163416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16836584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.51633656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96457773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111504734","doi":"10.1089/1533129041492277","title":"What's Right and Wrong with Democracy in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Politics; Law; Download; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.011403205049991321,"score_gpt":0.3188849695822454,"score_spread":0.30748176453225406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111504734","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3029522,0.0075237523,0.000893443,0.4632919,0.0010190865,0.00012914596,0.0011402539,0.00008060843,0.22296955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92634654,0.0019623924,0.0005030959,0.019070985,0.00013107691,0.00003126122,0.00014766115,0.00006168855,0.05174529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97905695,0.0026588142,0.00046291362,0.001266186,0.0054507665,0.011104435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751872,0.004185706,0.0011187033,0.0004949037,0.008117565,0.010895881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007237792,0.00033121547,0.0011191916,0.002528564,0.048060182,0.019976897,0.0031541937,0.007246863,0.01515431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027530374,0.000693542,0.0009779945,0.0063789356,0.013255558,0.003963134,0.0046191537,0.012582129,0.00054756016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029795305,0.00024326767,0.06983303,0.00034517812,0.0002149743,0.00094502047,0.028799234,0.0031316348,0.00031025248,0.643086,0.18507484,0.06771864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000305856,0.00011528796,0.19073881,0.0010039206,0.0003422486,0.00033520508,0.09158392,0.00451333,0.0008672753,0.09974267,0.6099226,0.00052893435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30113667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.30113667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.521038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8105824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113186760","doi":"","title":"Ethics and Leadership in Times of Austerity: Ontario's Courts and \"Justice on Target\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Austerity; Argument (complex analysis); Service (business); Public sector; Public relations; Political science; Law; Business; Marketing; Medicine","score_opus":0.2963253455218431,"score_gpt":0.4059184257017706,"score_spread":0.10959308017992753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113186760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48922917,0.0012730329,0.0010856128,0.11703429,0.00023994983,0.00011686673,0.00009564245,0.000030945615,0.39089456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794479,0.00044410012,0.00026277002,0.0018804633,0.000029054068,0.000016088161,0.000014424028,0.000010584443,0.01789466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938595,0.0017790628,0.000083165985,0.00025385915,0.0016679184,0.0023564596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99191767,0.0015677675,0.0011929699,0.00024117311,0.0018153186,0.003265069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031507309,0.00019101905,0.0002046376,0.00081646885,0.023084555,0.008736716,0.0010099178,0.0019327382,0.0042383117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008831776,0.00022072143,0.00018533316,0.0015044392,0.025108198,0.002334956,0.003903453,0.0022674948,0.00023224553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011332873,0.00013979003,0.07350178,0.00015194512,0.000025953712,0.0014167625,0.3722147,0.0008352831,0.00060750666,0.40570867,0.08713358,0.058150638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004408266,0.00007812433,0.17953442,0.00020841898,0.00003128511,0.00024434878,0.4462553,0.0007885482,0.00030688941,0.024868302,0.34755895,0.000081351194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9693936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99137586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9693936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15598324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18984567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97893983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113978615","doi":"10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172309","title":"Women in the Legal Profession","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Feminization (sociology); Remuneration; Inequality; Legal education; Law; Legal research; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.055934275401579865,"score_gpt":0.43478064499133956,"score_spread":0.3788463695897597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113978615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26042244,0.12709291,0.0015648319,0.26152322,0.0034739324,0.000051496052,0.00021746538,0.000040229083,0.34561348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81190413,0.056878604,0.00055313867,0.032923847,0.0015871339,0.000058237045,0.000078296805,0.00003660292,0.095980056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791366,0.00088321965,0.00004491454,0.00021807537,0.0003932324,0.00054678146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983891,0.0005765629,0.0002159976,0.00004561934,0.00018830573,0.00058439164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026518535,0.00017851674,0.00042275104,0.001129266,0.007311636,0.00424309,0.00040896313,0.0014256862,0.014408051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045289155,0.00013836632,0.00014600214,0.0015153143,0.0072081154,0.003212301,0.0042031896,0.0015790653,0.0019545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097355594,0.00011555122,0.02730907,0.00040230463,0.000017007436,0.0013575444,0.30342788,0.000071408875,0.0013097285,0.36749595,0.08222315,0.21617311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009965401,0.00005798313,0.0081484495,0.0005711444,0.00001003125,0.0006477876,0.10847114,0.000022186046,0.00015787911,0.017015606,0.86487377,0.000014021017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013558387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018272988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014408051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025994799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004186379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048199713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115080986","doi":"","title":"University v. Student Challenging the Contractual Understanding of Higher Education in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redaction; Political science; Higher education; Humanities; Library science; Law; Art; Computer science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.016350951305812607,"score_gpt":0.23803787043269617,"score_spread":0.22168691912688357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115080986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5383985,0.0014411923,0.0012387026,0.080661766,0.0004269947,0.00008444837,0.00029324225,0.000044049455,0.37741107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93942523,0.00038188015,0.0002061661,0.0032036577,0.000021256197,0.000011315176,0.000038358743,0.000019753335,0.056692332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954288,0.00073864707,0.000092702954,0.00030556126,0.0012806514,0.0021536988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217695,0.0013427474,0.0004385712,0.00020906139,0.0024177118,0.0034150293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034340643,0.00016509267,0.00032949206,0.0008563893,0.028611219,0.011005595,0.0016757996,0.0031389035,0.016061746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010676922,0.00020675595,0.00025464853,0.0018694894,0.00783312,0.0023515185,0.0048552444,0.0040662815,0.00056915765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010734064,0.00012742191,0.03999089,0.00008688914,0.000017640834,0.0014466201,0.2582075,0.00088014995,0.00058011175,0.543572,0.09190651,0.06307692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026699656,0.00004060614,0.055533916,0.00032112302,0.000023465087,0.00022427225,0.47449455,0.0016868741,0.00067022437,0.022149019,0.44470873,0.000120464494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99384487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121668786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.121668786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19155379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.882773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115872543","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.1.143","title":"Sexual Consent as Voluntary Agreement: Tales of “Seduction” or Questions of Law?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntariness; Plaintiff; Plea; Law; Reasonable person; Sexual assault; Psychology; Common law; Political science; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.14573273859255423,"score_gpt":0.4411455447944021,"score_spread":0.29541280620184784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115872543","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037226643,0.009330507,0.3848123,0.25724673,0.0029500287,0.0005357081,0.00014293092,0.00033905744,0.3074161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8748274,0.0038386602,0.07218828,0.022650657,0.001413364,0.0008427405,0.00007446609,0.00033170579,0.023832714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9371158,0.046162035,0.0020579437,0.0042195753,0.008657353,0.001787357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9184753,0.06468857,0.0035486943,0.008470949,0.003989356,0.0008271453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06665879,0.0008686508,0.0010179761,0.004195794,0.010812495,0.01841866,0.0036758007,0.011676644,0.0045420565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1058129,0.0010697708,0.0013529023,0.0027406525,0.18138279,0.048053116,0.011428129,0.015075793,0.0009763885],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062997174,0.000007678019,0.00013212975,0.00002404362,0.000002963716,0.000031443815,0.012818809,0.000078925295,0.000039498922,0.981716,0.000783752,0.0043584052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009627521,0.000015641263,0.00014499166,0.00019958879,0.000005101774,0.00007215988,0.0061478172,0.00038221513,0.00022135781,0.949017,0.043759573,0.000024883408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009907952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053914594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06665879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008559783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013222816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3525296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116362825","doi":"10.1177/0886368711416434","title":"Women, Private Practice and Billable Hours","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Compensation & Benefits Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Ontario Medical Association","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Business; Law; Public relations; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.137116248515428,"score_gpt":0.36794592359630873,"score_spread":0.23082967508088073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116362825","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17435646,0.38660878,0.00076679495,0.1959343,0.002596379,0.000069916314,0.00015248047,0.000010133235,0.23950477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86734384,0.09149433,0.00023300145,0.014077055,0.0017555145,0.000046730725,0.000056741406,0.000008937012,0.024983821],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532264,0.002342169,0.00021976519,0.00034607123,0.0012669731,0.00050236605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881628,0.006892079,0.0026281222,0.00021303905,0.000983703,0.0011202194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004083491,0.000105126295,0.00030920558,0.0010647968,0.0015967503,0.0025766718,0.00052540225,0.0015758278,0.007382894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013705751,0.00010964505,0.00016414163,0.0016306302,0.0037024214,0.0026263727,0.0010721224,0.0010590057,0.00036104958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019694165,0.00038827572,0.07587087,0.0023342846,0.00011083622,0.0008354402,0.021524623,0.00023813515,0.00035846693,0.39647672,0.07777323,0.4238922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049328635,0.00039889742,0.15361589,0.0052403132,0.000080424375,0.0012235724,0.03806948,0.00009263915,0.00024415873,0.035886444,0.7650597,0.000039104496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0126170805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027379187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0126170805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032022216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044494504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025087297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116469998","doi":"10.1177/0018726707080079","title":"Hired professional to hired gun: An identity theory approach to understanding the ethical behaviour of professionals in non-professional organizations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Relations","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Corporation; Identity (music); Public relations; Professional responsibility; Process (computing); Professional ethics; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11247978806460586,"score_gpt":0.4696475342291505,"score_spread":0.35716774616454466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116469998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7795407,0.0031482624,0.030683996,0.06720882,0.00029003428,0.00011621103,0.000044548473,0.000016077342,0.11895136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942094,0.000681186,0.0019566799,0.0008935429,0.000031800602,0.00003514223,0.000011834342,0.000004957634,0.0021755253],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99389654,0.004503112,0.000089332214,0.00028557205,0.00049692445,0.0007285074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926912,0.0048030517,0.0009060273,0.0002036693,0.00058843807,0.00080757757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076551195,0.00033662195,0.0003889539,0.002722879,0.009217031,0.0100860875,0.0020311195,0.0031659775,0.0037359735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010320737,0.00025271456,0.00041378502,0.0014940263,0.01996986,0.011602522,0.0044030217,0.0035108828,0.00027636465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024976653,0.00021917048,0.01339321,0.00008488859,0.000010739252,0.00031524934,0.48469475,0.00033522837,0.00014980149,0.47471264,0.0017363303,0.02432302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012758374,0.00003755965,0.010615465,0.00021362437,0.000010859671,0.00015428885,0.78535587,0.002376967,0.00015803013,0.18582518,0.01521803,0.00002138448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056285117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066812135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056285117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012093354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012986372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11191499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117658617","doi":"10.1002/j.2161-1920.2003.tb00857.x","title":"Gender barriers in the legal profession: Implications for career development of female law students","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Employment Counseling","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Career development; Psychology; Career counseling; Legal profession; Psychosocial; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12526450984380552,"score_gpt":0.44304729882061356,"score_spread":0.317782788976808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117658617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9277655,0.003577591,0.00059889175,0.045656424,0.00036239193,0.00006854313,0.000054390395,0.0000067312158,0.021909555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99029595,0.0017752858,0.00027012173,0.0016699531,0.00006499946,0.000064562184,0.000016444941,0.0000045123465,0.00583815],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981128,0.00094680226,0.000049184677,0.00009778277,0.0002456946,0.0005477338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995568,0.0017336048,0.0004869082,0.00004833255,0.00035581406,0.0018073356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030237988,0.00019222127,0.0002548137,0.00090672297,0.0058348114,0.002783735,0.00058068195,0.001133467,0.0067993314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008105146,0.0001781471,0.00019552828,0.00064126874,0.0020890634,0.0018182443,0.0029662086,0.0015078944,0.0003482362],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023673341,0.0011266057,0.2782962,0.00026656585,0.000013702221,0.004173457,0.538088,0.00015206133,0.0018379367,0.04025205,0.008996242,0.12656045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002707837,0.0002450823,0.15781961,0.0005751896,0.0000102054255,0.0022409733,0.7936494,0.00024170092,0.0003558653,0.0057859295,0.03901995,0.000029071693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017343868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014137728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048339567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022746086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118268266","doi":"10.5791/0882-2875-23.4.210","title":"The Cross-Examiner's Tactics: What the Expert Witness Should Know","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Valuation Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Expert witness; Need to know; Cross-examination; Actuarial science; Business; Computer science; Law; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.19334209331481794,"score_gpt":0.484645277328926,"score_spread":0.29130318401410804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118268266","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021058777,0.19820437,0.015413495,0.74753195,0.017348427,0.0000710771,0.00011527263,0.000152016,0.019057494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10129947,0.26779822,0.05046452,0.50809926,0.05143498,0.00055121596,0.0002656801,0.0005020108,0.01958469],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.974459,0.014828804,0.002221215,0.0017484261,0.006021796,0.00072082144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84806156,0.1159814,0.0037104695,0.006754024,0.019182794,0.0063097384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05915229,0.0009945168,0.001686684,0.0029312996,0.006737755,0.013975658,0.0040468317,0.019515611,0.0053097922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21429314,0.0012252792,0.00057835906,0.0017365878,0.02399783,0.047246747,0.004896004,0.017236153,0.0051749875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010735467,0.00010527583,0.0034249632,0.002073712,0.00005309234,0.0009761669,0.0127101755,0.00014658789,0.0003338693,0.064790145,0.4977567,0.4175219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050033403,0.00020000366,0.003349634,0.016059317,0.000060746366,0.004315393,0.02501945,0.0004825868,0.0005712122,0.2171837,0.7325274,0.00018050997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006245513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009998082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05915229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002987255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009697595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31283092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119918168","doi":"10.32920/22227781","title":"Barriers to the Profession: Inaction in Ontario, Canada and its Consequences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Diversity (politics); Medical profession; Limiting; Perception; White (mutation); White paper; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Medicine; Psychology; Medical education; Engineering; Chemistry","score_opus":0.054552175069815925,"score_gpt":0.37226311436153686,"score_spread":0.31771093929172095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119918168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.897112,0.0041432492,0.00022457835,0.061110135,0.0003623172,0.00019681548,0.001915112,0.000050999613,0.034884688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790943,0.0025537787,0.00016483474,0.003328239,0.00005332851,0.00004915416,0.00046229796,0.000029440662,0.014264538],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924845,0.0004292726,0.00022319444,0.00036501518,0.0028326104,0.0036654256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97624856,0.0010899259,0.0033531236,0.0003964514,0.0069109127,0.012001151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002710398,0.00036170505,0.000544854,0.0023576051,0.021962242,0.0048106746,0.003674495,0.0020007894,0.0094351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009001416,0.00063293596,0.0007654984,0.0051546325,0.0058032167,0.0020574832,0.005082682,0.003983428,0.0005113044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003393298,0.0005046781,0.70266205,0.0006393729,0.00007873524,0.001739514,0.12713683,0.00045524113,0.0007194969,0.016280442,0.071404114,0.07804007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031136125,0.000054316508,0.81964594,0.000760982,0.000030815372,0.00017587106,0.12297356,0.0004122871,0.00013160809,0.00076610316,0.054949395,0.000067986155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99837804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17038777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17038777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27588117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9622326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120412134","doi":"","title":"Report Regarding the Pacific McGeorge Workshop on Globalizing the Law School Curriculum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Comparative law; Political science; International law; Law; Legal education; Criminal law; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02943293822929155,"score_gpt":0.2829992173835312,"score_spread":0.2535662791542396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120412134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01863283,0.010154335,0.0045155836,0.5161914,0.029033542,0.0016620383,0.002028808,0.0007582533,0.4170232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062451594,0.013706237,0.01047089,0.084844,0.00569558,0.001771071,0.0044075833,0.00068983465,0.81596327],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994175,0.0011889703,0.00012556359,0.0006405401,0.001960103,0.0019098362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99130225,0.00077295396,0.00022353679,0.00025251336,0.0012725675,0.006176068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010918794,0.0012167309,0.00047360596,0.0017360962,0.007690358,0.009549382,0.0028541936,0.0074780467,0.049176656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061959787,0.0008339909,0.00080469716,0.0019554594,0.0023523879,0.0052736765,0.010267424,0.011320492,0.008093232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004277342,0.00028515162,0.00069340534,0.00009854238,0.000004964906,0.00021899457,0.002748546,0.00014897872,0.0004130621,0.009405859,0.95369494,0.032244783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000127104295,0.000030315232,0.002470426,0.00026018536,0.000003447935,0.000026644579,0.002495182,0.000043377462,0.000111437235,0.0005973481,0.9939387,0.000010144061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12492075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2564551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12492075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0118939215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048741948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24838728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122916132","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-37090-8_4","title":"“Law, Marching with Medicine but in the Rear and Limping a Little”: Ethics as “First Aid” for Law","year":2013,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Medical law; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.12196712636452926,"score_gpt":0.40122037667342303,"score_spread":0.27925325030889375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122916132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003341637,0.031012356,0.013767327,0.13912615,0.0039968276,0.00005937873,0.00004963858,0.00011476514,0.8085318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22560692,0.015348799,0.013012564,0.0855352,0.0030928485,0.00021308522,0.000076809134,0.0003477063,0.6567661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975715,0.0014677767,0.000058967333,0.0001908351,0.0005006154,0.00021024219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982815,0.0011556303,0.00009610297,0.00012558661,0.00019724731,0.00014398877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026094562,0.0005575524,0.00033722597,0.0006691008,0.004702689,0.0070528677,0.0011649871,0.0059450045,0.0066813855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052855816,0.00033193684,0.00030754157,0.0007376718,0.02651654,0.008891768,0.0022077572,0.009019529,0.0018973598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025422326,0.000009018972,0.000036542067,0.000022278893,0.0000011463036,0.000020304307,0.0037190695,0.00004992813,0.000048650858,0.93329304,0.05501657,0.007780853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047239105,0.000008217201,0.00012986592,0.00025199717,0.0000024947158,0.000088729095,0.00267255,0.00014875605,0.00019491969,0.50747424,0.48901227,0.000011179784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009593713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019365264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009593713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042059068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011129982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030516148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123403087","doi":"10.1017/cls.2013.61","title":"How Much “Law” in Legal Studies? Approaches to Teaching Legal Research and Doctrinal Analysis in a Legal Studies Program","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies; Legal psychology; Law; Legal education; Legal realism; Political science; Legal opinion; Practice of law; International Legal English Certificate; Legal ethics; Legal writing; Legal history; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Comparative law; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.18414222737001318,"score_gpt":0.42393102368995494,"score_spread":0.23978879631994177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123403087","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24376148,0.010028403,0.049754538,0.35336715,0.0022971188,0.00063752674,0.00004699962,0.00034888057,0.33975792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89280105,0.0063344333,0.029006025,0.017577648,0.00053209177,0.0005793822,0.000037719805,0.00011447097,0.05301721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99002516,0.007534942,0.00018696931,0.0005351325,0.00073220575,0.0009856635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795757,0.011925362,0.00086524105,0.00059063203,0.0013165768,0.0057264585],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015177256,0.00044915595,0.00049217977,0.0022143924,0.013169509,0.014325438,0.0021542984,0.0036970428,0.009147938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0121267475,0.00058576994,0.00034595482,0.0011285616,0.026730426,0.007805926,0.008683092,0.011361751,0.0010117659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031710002,0.0018125676,0.0044786436,0.00030343924,0.0000065165646,0.00061945984,0.31069818,0.0004043299,0.0016689637,0.53897095,0.030922834,0.11008243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006228206,0.00030563827,0.005539548,0.0013347241,0.000011749846,0.0006657094,0.29939848,0.0016278904,0.0018383061,0.20260376,0.48655346,0.00005848236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012171466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03624604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98482275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018677501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028628245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13551539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127915910","doi":"","title":"Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Secondary Sources: Treatises & Books","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.2814704885196405,"score_gpt":0.47381190486557984,"score_spread":0.19234141634593932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127915910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076318166,0.017107783,0.0007057489,0.012336036,0.0015616177,0.0003286472,0.029678276,0.0006418377,0.93687695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035329105,0.00997307,0.0014061098,0.0015748726,0.00017224294,0.0001403166,0.005679252,0.0002802891,0.97724086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967494,0.00017073758,0.00016878513,0.00021018193,0.0022671395,0.0004338911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903071,0.0013825416,0.00020799643,0.00038020677,0.007030141,0.00069200824],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002726665,0.0013437733,0.0010238278,0.015203221,0.011973559,0.011321304,0.0025734934,0.004222674,0.31344527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010711459,0.0013308979,0.00075125624,0.024793189,0.0031723164,0.004057528,0.0018924518,0.003494874,0.06398578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004179767,0.000009732013,0.00008821659,0.00013601032,0.0000011555767,0.0000113620235,0.0002012876,0.00003497414,0.000021302758,0.012855358,0.970616,0.0160204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034662141,0.0000017276128,0.0010170651,0.0002951824,0.000003207611,0.000011307795,0.00033302963,0.000029118486,0.000047883164,0.0013618261,0.99688476,0.0000114938775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9691593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31344527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06701189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19565396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.979287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129254812","doi":"10.1353/hpu.2012.0179","title":"Pilot Study of Impact of Medical-Legal Partnership Services on Patients’ Perceived Stress and Wellbeing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Family Medicine","funders":"","keywords":"Perceived Stress Scale; General partnership; Legal service; Scale (ratio); Medicine; Perception; Service (business); Family medicine; Psychology; Stress (linguistics); Political science","score_opus":0.0969771735830131,"score_gpt":0.4355614910585966,"score_spread":0.3385843174755835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129254812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993388,0.000022206581,0.00004148684,0.000065064676,0.000006319605,0.000190972,0.00004700918,0.000002442746,0.0002857268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899155,0.00003598513,0.0002492081,0.00008126585,0.00001531277,0.00041753356,0.00006340112,0.0000011983448,0.00014447921],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983576,0.0010203582,0.000072495095,0.000088733264,0.00016416298,0.00029667988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951852,0.0015511665,0.00062681694,0.00022902082,0.0005785527,0.0018291837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003041796,0.0003068018,0.00037375677,0.00038886565,0.0012749685,0.0005336707,0.0004158698,0.00041769128,0.005440503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050786976,0.00024421138,0.00045051586,0.0003421349,0.00062700757,0.00052046246,0.0010904804,0.0011151094,0.00048555393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015581287,0.09480872,0.7482854,0.0004964504,0.00019584247,0.0014793621,0.025687609,0.00042781723,0.004161075,0.00022325764,0.0026876812,0.105965495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034322657,0.20373824,0.75912654,0.00012269328,0.00014195014,0.00073051173,0.026133636,0.000938553,0.0026682504,0.00017721427,0.0027208354,0.00006922809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023929009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004086847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005440503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085107965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018452888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018200278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130772784","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v1i0.127","title":"Why not an International Journal of Clinical Legal Education?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Milestone; Legal education; Political science; Law; Legal profession; Foundation (evidence); Phenomenon; Sociology; Public administration; History","score_opus":0.12128482251116936,"score_gpt":0.578979243557481,"score_spread":0.45769442104631164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130772784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005221382,0.011357944,0.00019939899,0.95441043,0.01974597,0.000005697459,0.000012962813,0.00002304511,0.01372233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051859654,0.033871662,0.0019622978,0.81682307,0.05028875,0.00008323171,0.000102007194,0.00017906167,0.04483023],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98669887,0.0044374582,0.000889826,0.0010990237,0.0051889215,0.0016858673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94118726,0.01253482,0.0028167863,0.0018619208,0.013842658,0.02775655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011392388,0.00032139826,0.0005864168,0.0016563926,0.005521334,0.014851226,0.0018160846,0.012320818,0.032107864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05825021,0.00035043142,0.00041482513,0.0018237621,0.011274293,0.015158267,0.005729434,0.020170456,0.010630568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014445875,0.00009322099,0.001194943,0.00021189508,0.000006297222,0.00018350464,0.0011325886,0.000016471062,0.00008132639,0.05171228,0.8893226,0.05603049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014746736,0.000027060614,0.0014256611,0.00081511866,0.0000065675067,0.00052746595,0.003284322,0.000036791167,0.00006260084,0.018336402,0.97544247,0.000020708358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021173842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006478693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032107864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035993678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015443124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107411504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131400723","doi":"10.1017/s1472669610000393","title":"Teaching Legal Research in Canadian Law Schools: Are We Meeting the Needs of the Profession?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Relation (database); Legal research; Legal education; Law; Process (computing); Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.059927399506550516,"score_gpt":0.4183067987122265,"score_spread":0.35837939920567596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131400723","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017104872,0.01882848,0.002028942,0.9125962,0.0028963685,0.00009486918,0.00007732784,0.00015174055,0.046221223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58107865,0.07370783,0.025145723,0.23515713,0.0030499913,0.00036269092,0.00032674527,0.0003628912,0.08080843],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9532246,0.010971844,0.0012343236,0.0023714218,0.017278098,0.014919835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85090923,0.030239342,0.005953583,0.003158604,0.04423675,0.06550245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03973281,0.0008202958,0.0011456094,0.0069486275,0.0778805,0.037949085,0.006538466,0.014608776,0.010969977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07621069,0.0013916205,0.00084533,0.012587378,0.061463088,0.016552415,0.013253787,0.015105779,0.00208251],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007342121,0.00031173512,0.01196094,0.0013930148,0.000046855326,0.00091411214,0.2212646,0.0005317925,0.0007718785,0.16178742,0.33172408,0.26922014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043931414,0.00007652355,0.015532739,0.001208757,0.000032608783,0.00028819375,0.2290986,0.00033467732,0.0002814893,0.0319041,0.7209884,0.0002099153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9827413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76243675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23756327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6605079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88431853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131418799","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.4.214","title":"My Favourite Plagiarist: Some Reflections of an Offended Party","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Favourite; Work (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.09458274108467288,"score_gpt":0.3993961375232506,"score_spread":0.30481339643857774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131418799","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02011813,0.002470276,0.0012608613,0.8873735,0.0139272185,0.000031995743,0.000024749168,0.0000839068,0.07470937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2878955,0.0021702289,0.00083605887,0.5856418,0.013684223,0.00008589416,0.00002701048,0.0004238686,0.109235495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857108,0.008363145,0.00035642736,0.0009519012,0.0024727585,0.0021449756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97418433,0.014311962,0.0013340362,0.001810887,0.004627505,0.003731263],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01436841,0.00076845847,0.0006667567,0.0014653885,0.037324555,0.021487214,0.003761913,0.03310374,0.00748713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06913278,0.00055825105,0.0010028592,0.0014837027,0.025218945,0.016782995,0.011750336,0.049387902,0.0029911334],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010956333,0.00017814183,0.0016403779,0.00012461176,0.000026116182,0.0050882488,0.25052702,0.00016606133,0.00074003433,0.18107595,0.5398256,0.020498263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020070118,0.000058030524,0.00053360517,0.00025770138,0.000009741885,0.0008884158,0.13437253,0.0001704893,0.00031801363,0.024118202,0.83919513,0.000058011265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065148626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010828741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96689624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059196153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004198532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07598835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133066758","doi":"","title":"KF Modified and the Classification of Canadian Common Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Jurisdiction; Law library; Law; Class (philosophy); Political science; Common law; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04707655272147427,"score_gpt":0.3297913147573707,"score_spread":0.28271476203589646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133066758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13289085,0.0043055676,0.019555967,0.06422692,0.0010986057,0.00035796675,0.0025761027,0.00058893976,0.77439904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78379315,0.0024614877,0.022751238,0.0084613,0.00024430416,0.00012883921,0.001759938,0.00041946996,0.17998031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790277,0.0014077796,0.00088062824,0.0018021072,0.0128735425,0.00400833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678835,0.0036113495,0.001276927,0.0027234172,0.022183374,0.0023214805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067564426,0.00040336422,0.00064490235,0.016421106,0.02422039,0.022298938,0.0039055564,0.0027561083,0.013925586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036047366,0.00058542023,0.0008740187,0.019224996,0.016083123,0.012709927,0.007431527,0.004330737,0.0010587651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008796604,0.00003225998,0.01756415,0.00020532493,0.000029404187,0.0003412133,0.029764675,0.00142171,0.00056545757,0.7248523,0.069956966,0.15517864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014071842,0.000023725353,0.04850087,0.00039442827,0.000044105993,0.00030559735,0.026039109,0.0028521148,0.001002517,0.083824664,0.83665764,0.00034109148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97216165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9839324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15553287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15553287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12869176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97946215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133230046","doi":"","title":"A Longitudinal Analysis of the U.S. News Law School Academic Reputation Scores between 1998 and 2013","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Huskie Commons (Northern Illinois University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Period (music); Longitudinal study; Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Set (abstract data type); Political science; Law; Medicine; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.04171701854984389,"score_gpt":0.2977407631250004,"score_spread":0.25602374457515653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133230046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865089,0.00028193052,0.000264344,0.0010397027,0.000084459294,0.00003577726,0.008632464,0.000033281445,0.0031191064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98889774,0.00024547917,0.00019678469,0.00017123467,0.00006362616,0.000062524305,0.008155543,0.000015207263,0.0021918684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988549,0.0002461649,0.0001103251,0.00017340822,0.00036118843,0.00025405246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98463446,0.001614021,0.0061704693,0.00083348615,0.004648892,0.002098704],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030564899,0.00019072132,0.00026774994,0.0024555833,0.0010281183,0.0015179696,0.0005675804,0.00051307987,0.0028998898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010802162,0.00026663265,0.0005451143,0.004128279,0.00031359136,0.0016041305,0.0011297426,0.0015745545,0.0012395633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004897974,0.00011406804,0.9885683,0.000010454129,0.000049421546,0.000030941876,0.0006916647,0.00006214127,0.00004361228,0.00015660576,0.0048062145,0.0054175705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023318448,0.00005904814,0.9964761,0.000013409272,0.000013890162,0.000022575307,0.0009320734,0.00019923903,0.000046308178,0.000029303352,0.0021983488,0.0000075052103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07861463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.114287846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99694353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014337014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019616736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15631407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133411276","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2402379","title":"The Flipped Classroom: How Using Technology Outside the Classroom Can Make Law Classes More Productive and Enjoyable","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Flipped classroom; Mathematics education; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.01879878520552358,"score_gpt":0.332266235977352,"score_spread":0.3134674507718284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133411276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4805313,0.0016714218,0.1396707,0.01666394,0.0019064611,0.00088616036,0.0003408515,0.0024288588,0.35590035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8394255,0.0010002337,0.08944617,0.0023732195,0.00022197685,0.00059528684,0.00023309921,0.00041608317,0.066288516],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982657,0.0008803955,0.000030257348,0.00028932336,0.00025164793,0.00028270987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971841,0.0012890035,0.0001679571,0.0003945643,0.00024261225,0.0007217351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013851469,0.00072925625,0.0003234044,0.0006257533,0.0032412151,0.006354755,0.0020952297,0.0020095215,0.030256866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064755194,0.00032626372,0.00055524067,0.00039770812,0.0028677653,0.006712318,0.005412842,0.0025540006,0.0057143704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063696224,0.008086915,0.010942885,0.0010012584,0.000055752203,0.0029131623,0.06661745,0.0015504273,0.0293295,0.07963923,0.08480162,0.7144247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075163355,0.0044715577,0.022110622,0.0022448828,0.0002106017,0.003666418,0.1060031,0.00901082,0.024440149,0.13362364,0.69310534,0.00036129262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014953933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037981689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030256866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010179427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002784732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1012193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133560527","doi":"10.1177/1057567706295486","title":"Indigenous-Run Legal Services in Australia and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Criminal Justice Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal service; Face (sociological concept); Politics; Demographics; Legal research; Political science; Representation (politics); Legal culture; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Social science; Ecology","score_opus":0.04578314015224745,"score_gpt":0.3999189300624869,"score_spread":0.3541357899102395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133560527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8235572,0.015821418,0.00026415018,0.010900587,0.00012840582,0.00015223185,0.00024799167,0.00002515468,0.14890285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740563,0.0070601087,0.00039856738,0.001337708,0.000019719146,0.00004204448,0.000097105934,0.0000067122946,0.016981727],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972836,0.00034308847,0.00007015106,0.00016706069,0.0010232576,0.0011128625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99533445,0.00053008884,0.0004402727,0.00006455637,0.0013414171,0.002289176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001007738,0.00013608785,0.00028348685,0.0019488834,0.009105322,0.0027990337,0.0009960743,0.0007230513,0.00457449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004388345,0.00019003043,0.00015807406,0.0034473783,0.0022009087,0.00087893347,0.0025885985,0.0010011051,0.00016941852],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019721175,0.00077028456,0.28282648,0.0018793346,0.00015508155,0.007545126,0.14589429,0.0020062912,0.0019348939,0.15728632,0.038390327,0.3611142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043073745,0.00012102228,0.7327149,0.00078728894,0.00007260898,0.0011460723,0.09676268,0.0009492696,0.00031222822,0.0027939822,0.16421583,0.000081008744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04852873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04852873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10637003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35210222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134430022","doi":"","title":"Public Service Ethics in the New Millennium: The Evolving Canadian System","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Information ethics; Government (linguistics); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Service (business); Political science; Ethical code; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Public relations; Public administration; Computer science; Business; Law; Engineering; Philosophy; Marketing","score_opus":0.07299654097945171,"score_gpt":0.3518017207287447,"score_spread":0.278805179749293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134430022","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037161652,0.03992313,0.0022518102,0.7098985,0.002787616,0.00008752809,0.0005116394,0.00015502796,0.20722318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7175185,0.057111196,0.012882585,0.11501446,0.0013392325,0.00019415017,0.0005572257,0.00023923052,0.09514347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823704,0.0025820371,0.00043414926,0.0010535927,0.008570269,0.004989618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670069,0.0044869124,0.0010415316,0.0007713073,0.013481686,0.013211713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013186686,0.00058690325,0.00082741625,0.0043029045,0.033742826,0.02000031,0.0034405177,0.0064434237,0.009303379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021928554,0.000622747,0.00062553864,0.0077643446,0.026974361,0.007400012,0.0071073123,0.010369541,0.00080853223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038143287,0.00007035887,0.004548152,0.00027931374,0.000026110929,0.00048223682,0.021692,0.000758051,0.0002855467,0.7324641,0.16554223,0.07381373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020303876,0.000028918595,0.013181352,0.0008744164,0.000022184944,0.00020454294,0.023107447,0.0011191191,0.00013699688,0.0882765,0.87283903,0.00018924708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99648947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6142331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.38576692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5187847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7124233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135003238","doi":"10.1017/s1472669606000673","title":"Life at a Large US Law Firm","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Management; Law library; Business; Sociology; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; History; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.015120928978115037,"score_gpt":0.31146954078548117,"score_spread":0.29634861180736616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135003238","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15058622,0.0044188537,0.00065041677,0.59881705,0.0021759707,0.00007471582,0.0002863697,0.00018356732,0.2428068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3076041,0.003520759,0.00064514077,0.1785836,0.00094006467,0.00008956111,0.00029031778,0.00012735283,0.5081991],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775714,0.00048745214,0.000046347377,0.0002532138,0.00055941526,0.00089646806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912578,0.00068555266,0.0002415822,0.000120081124,0.0008197748,0.006875404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001536934,0.00028083468,0.00023228607,0.00071586727,0.028065264,0.009736738,0.0008975386,0.005750252,0.039341908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039850776,0.00045456068,0.00020425337,0.0012358362,0.0032649096,0.005109083,0.0030485378,0.007883481,0.00804342],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054597363,0.0006367669,0.013441696,0.00003663306,0.000018798835,0.0028393923,0.013260368,0.00016298378,0.0007982026,0.027255405,0.87661034,0.06488477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019417346,0.0001462811,0.010332002,0.00014212355,0.000010258065,0.00041814227,0.041438885,0.00030055354,0.0002511827,0.0046669147,0.9422148,0.000059425296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08046083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3087062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08046083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009115803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016851777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.159985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137754152","doi":"10.1017/s1472669606000831","title":"Legal Information Retrieval Study – Lexis Professional and Westlaw UK","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction","keywords":"Lexis; Legal research; Computer science; Political science; Information retrieval; Library science; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015525875127511649,"score_gpt":0.3348233183128624,"score_spread":0.31929744318535075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137754152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67717427,0.033771984,0.0009673443,0.04537625,0.0006115312,0.0007390571,0.0027098153,0.00010470888,0.23854513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8942803,0.0117147025,0.001084358,0.004580575,0.0003757837,0.00053589843,0.0012070606,0.00009536809,0.086125895],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97950464,0.0067454027,0.0021188066,0.0011421813,0.009285572,0.0012033992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8765757,0.0779237,0.013287396,0.0041438933,0.02354515,0.0045241597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010510775,0.00022375447,0.0005844789,0.0061759767,0.0033666014,0.0057015345,0.000528217,0.0014615399,0.025583489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077270225,0.00054644415,0.00025743365,0.008022476,0.0025608307,0.00843238,0.0022873941,0.0014850745,0.0034144141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016491893,0.002257172,0.12813397,0.0030817906,0.00012670261,0.0014831201,0.12610637,0.00021375154,0.0031759457,0.04019802,0.17297618,0.5205979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030991845,0.0020263433,0.45087716,0.003403284,0.00015902169,0.001830687,0.07658501,0.0005509614,0.0034665903,0.003230652,0.45743817,0.00012226825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053570077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0776715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053570077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009631469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070622168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10651654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138437200","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00458.x","title":"Political Liberalism and Political Embeddedness: Understanding Politics in the Work of Chinese Criminal Defense Lawyers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Embeddedness; State (computer science); Political science; Grassroots; Power (physics); Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Social science","score_opus":0.1734326347790768,"score_gpt":0.4092485452642673,"score_spread":0.2358159104851905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138437200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652591,0.0023752195,0.0007593855,0.003467743,0.000018998177,0.000020432552,0.0000068739932,0.0000024021363,0.028089955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988783,0.00047420606,0.000066265675,0.00010289439,0.000008027776,0.0000073758542,0.00000289592,8.62924e-7,0.00045912078],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790215,0.001223905,0.00006223593,0.0001609481,0.00031427087,0.00033646348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850756,0.0008570345,0.0003379782,0.000044549073,0.000091149705,0.0001617393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021416782,0.00020435838,0.0002396181,0.0024673399,0.0038334175,0.0038770316,0.00053557934,0.0008243007,0.0015976492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024595275,0.00018712677,0.00012624817,0.00254783,0.011485687,0.0030124292,0.0022424296,0.00082362426,0.00008109846],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019180812,0.00003882076,0.044834513,0.00017342795,0.000010197116,0.00091041025,0.8713989,0.000115981085,0.00069903396,0.063799106,0.0005150275,0.017485404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017500233,0.000040174124,0.15473413,0.00022048742,0.000021150156,0.00024669504,0.8017317,0.0006107019,0.00019502071,0.014746274,0.027416877,0.00001925806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035444677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053714257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035444677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064456007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055210926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07047671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140356844","doi":"10.26522/tl.v3i2.45","title":"Ethically Speaking: Teachers and the Politics of Eduational Reform","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Accountability; Politics; Statement (logic); Pedagogy; Process (computing); Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Law","score_opus":0.02956453230033115,"score_gpt":0.3628469168837921,"score_spread":0.333282384583461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140356844","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04037825,0.007066994,0.0038503516,0.63441694,0.0007247407,0.00004848005,0.000035513578,0.000053123957,0.31342563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91708755,0.002122752,0.00083328696,0.030237928,0.00044929358,0.00004199837,0.000015976733,0.000046112553,0.04916513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97755504,0.011840356,0.0004932943,0.0011399416,0.004571763,0.0043996847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97728366,0.012996287,0.0018152593,0.0011730518,0.0039127236,0.0028191193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022851164,0.00021504742,0.0003952983,0.0011902977,0.021441372,0.01640728,0.0011368954,0.011492088,0.0049480046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037308674,0.00039847946,0.00030978952,0.0013586301,0.06669176,0.0060876636,0.0049550245,0.010396622,0.00050088105],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011138338,0.000011589376,0.000859871,0.000026396057,0.0000035971784,0.0001250147,0.021639142,0.00016285894,0.0000644997,0.9521864,0.018795565,0.006113882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039531675,0.000018034723,0.0033610594,0.0002528516,0.000012602241,0.00008171795,0.027827874,0.0005520401,0.00031600517,0.41319057,0.554301,0.000046724377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40714797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4961711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40714797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07059156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06900428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80955625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140820446","doi":"10.1002/job.554","title":"The professionalism of practising law: A comparison across work contexts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Collegiality; Autonomy; Public relations; Work (physics); Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Practice of law; Service (business); Law; Professional services; Legal service; Business; Psychology; Legal profession; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.10840160178633404,"score_gpt":0.4694838370837461,"score_spread":0.361082235297412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140820446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936481,0.0002486247,0.0003288977,0.0005268437,0.000012139594,0.000010589958,0.000005861212,0.0000040106765,0.005214935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952495,0.0000947365,0.00010117177,0.00004972173,0.0000063681514,0.0000056569984,0.0000039742895,0.0000021942315,0.00021133319],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868162,0.0080484105,0.0005607412,0.0007295346,0.0027486202,0.0010964423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693396,0.016922444,0.00497329,0.0011215558,0.0029324424,0.004710561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006930534,0.00011884235,0.00033266007,0.0027775206,0.0039199553,0.005052114,0.0008304806,0.00086429564,0.0016628894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029273005,0.0003155422,0.00023403316,0.0010278886,0.0079746675,0.0016696953,0.0055695577,0.0011565175,0.00017007824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021404514,0.00029933738,0.32602066,0.00024763172,0.00003441347,0.0009613096,0.61283404,0.00016631311,0.0025470285,0.005673374,0.00079753675,0.050204284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025251758,0.00026605133,0.36629602,0.00026777756,0.000011525549,0.0018523273,0.61822677,0.00052262814,0.00053198775,0.0036541543,0.008303107,0.00004243251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032666714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00577809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006930534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024337939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024358334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036652565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142592619","doi":"10.1177/0264550509346536","title":"Reforming justice for women: A century of struggle","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Probation Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Orthodoxy; Ideology; Economic Justice; Human rights; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042276897188564755,"score_gpt":0.39962437746445845,"score_spread":0.3573474802758937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142592619","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008747057,0.044726864,0.0011883439,0.9108349,0.0029940708,0.000017971852,0.000025988882,0.000024492934,0.031440314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55487347,0.06694612,0.0029405237,0.32369214,0.008758469,0.00015485918,0.000054215467,0.0001839709,0.042396236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97749966,0.011091812,0.0007496511,0.00181895,0.00422515,0.0046148403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798355,0.012479968,0.0009773426,0.00097087224,0.002391224,0.0033451105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024106763,0.00056258653,0.0014096287,0.0017347679,0.017721394,0.022043528,0.001668416,0.0149280215,0.0088823475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03372423,0.00048085264,0.00061146065,0.0022759528,0.05744645,0.019453593,0.010731988,0.015550202,0.001307911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088908244,0.000069451526,0.0006595441,0.0004401685,0.000024203782,0.00026774048,0.050607793,0.000226801,0.0002886237,0.75829285,0.098576844,0.09045711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032920445,0.00008290759,0.0011189302,0.0012492434,0.000011087993,0.0001544245,0.029275937,0.00013438467,0.0001809884,0.18990053,0.77781457,0.00004411713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03351365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04093813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03351365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03224414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028115436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23394871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144986047","doi":"10.1017/s1472669612000424","title":"Free Access to Law in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free access; Legislature; Access to information; Political science; Law; Information access; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03787595615320113,"score_gpt":0.35376460213865296,"score_spread":0.31588864598545185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144986047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116839156,0.017987821,0.0026865308,0.23195574,0.0009802524,0.00019016957,0.001076934,0.0002615343,0.6280219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78281426,0.01498707,0.003771509,0.023762329,0.00020579668,0.00006010412,0.00046438735,0.000092232054,0.17384233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945728,0.00036673155,0.00010768425,0.00035868454,0.0024343305,0.0021598567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930555,0.0009757853,0.00023632265,0.00017410688,0.002684444,0.0028738393],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002009028,0.0002265512,0.0003373972,0.0022819454,0.021848705,0.009831448,0.0013157581,0.002987572,0.009757151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065603512,0.00038594933,0.0004178964,0.003692374,0.008346384,0.0026519294,0.0035937866,0.003967313,0.00055760844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030522515,0.000077865894,0.007618428,0.00017488409,0.000018402403,0.0008562933,0.011661059,0.00087721896,0.00039196335,0.7637048,0.12029873,0.09428981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026398095,0.000040627267,0.027947955,0.00044471998,0.00003157884,0.0002500949,0.010203258,0.0018983289,0.0005274021,0.033202052,0.9252834,0.00014412754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99810994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21692218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34862837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9082593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145175947","doi":"10.1017/s1472669611000107","title":"Vendor Liaison: the Canadian Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vendor; Perspective (graphical); Association (psychology); Library science; Business; Computer science; Law; Political science; World Wide Web; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05552094119507241,"score_gpt":0.33583372651720866,"score_spread":0.28031278532213627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145175947","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042139916,0.04274855,0.00087947695,0.6073174,0.00232949,0.00002755132,0.00019406021,0.000055857254,0.34223354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30154735,0.20123528,0.0031472284,0.30726057,0.0032427392,0.000085852196,0.00022297906,0.00021253143,0.18304548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850404,0.0023458088,0.00034965467,0.0011496475,0.0067303604,0.004384113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98087317,0.003588406,0.00063428597,0.00027494915,0.008716339,0.0059127733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008052658,0.0007114209,0.0007246141,0.005466661,0.042623747,0.020200925,0.0037263439,0.013282154,0.021555288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016940799,0.00086720847,0.00056135433,0.010556983,0.019345926,0.0101220375,0.005246242,0.012802982,0.0018332424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020259498,0.000033132717,0.0014434245,0.00019850022,0.0000122902675,0.00069546595,0.0120790545,0.0002508639,0.00012703758,0.58591735,0.36474735,0.03447528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013833517,0.00001438867,0.0018768978,0.0006394639,0.000017466104,0.0003047251,0.018095711,0.00015116193,0.000060383372,0.024927592,0.9538277,0.000070688155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98649967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99409974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8061549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19384511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39380023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9350254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145678550","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12007","title":"The Legal Profession as a Social Process: A Theory on Lawyers and Globalization","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Globalization; Elite; Political science; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Sociology of law; Law; Process (computing); Collective action; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.04552034977072624,"score_gpt":0.4281744177441265,"score_spread":0.3826540679734003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145678550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086262174,0.008225634,0.08488005,0.119484104,0.00058282603,0.00021498447,0.000058005928,0.000095653675,0.70019656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96613485,0.0038762134,0.008827679,0.0039052425,0.0005080954,0.00021639369,0.000019438188,0.00003171051,0.016480293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969562,0.0018375692,0.00006007505,0.00027397432,0.0005270961,0.00034509107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966665,0.0020665196,0.0003921565,0.0001694984,0.00023204455,0.0004732237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034725151,0.0003870724,0.00038843325,0.0030398373,0.005188743,0.007235812,0.0011656043,0.003271869,0.006374645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038836093,0.00021182194,0.0005263622,0.0023183653,0.038895953,0.012212273,0.006017581,0.002430751,0.0005052696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013830805,0.000011498164,0.0002984521,0.000012731897,8.356724e-7,0.000045032462,0.006972713,0.00014830861,0.000015799667,0.98955536,0.00045223034,0.0024857244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015706655,0.000017528857,0.00085856894,0.00014458799,0.0000038809053,0.0000819505,0.0095249005,0.0013972487,0.000042886873,0.92273104,0.065173544,0.000008192639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063466216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003863903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007235812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007225584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007155644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052425563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146423270","doi":"10.1017/s1472669600001249","title":"the JSI in Canada: Part 2","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Bursary; Law library; Law; Joint (building); Political science; Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Management; Engineering; Philosophy; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.026717935413618495,"score_gpt":0.27971349079249325,"score_spread":0.25299555537887475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146423270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018218052,0.015323714,0.00039909018,0.23992977,0.01356807,0.0002627581,0.008793165,0.0004121924,0.7030932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032596942,0.004708919,0.00034048408,0.024523934,0.00079255085,0.00007893304,0.0019580934,0.00017340617,0.93482673],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960377,0.00009050449,0.000057260495,0.00019994704,0.0018636944,0.0017509301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994678,0.00012898039,0.00008314776,0.00009153218,0.0021321687,0.0028861489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016506197,0.0005253707,0.0003993431,0.001853332,0.013915741,0.010571091,0.0016127072,0.005127255,0.09353185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038919933,0.0004488424,0.00044944976,0.0044542584,0.0022621374,0.0017577684,0.003210448,0.003898628,0.014082464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001870129,0.0000260736,0.0023035032,0.00008003517,0.000004265895,0.00015665956,0.0011287166,0.00003966898,0.00025451163,0.008981847,0.96288466,0.024121396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042185943,0.000007095776,0.009987666,0.00006747035,0.000003453594,0.00004280717,0.0017432218,0.000028859118,0.00006968815,0.00025991444,0.9877735,0.000012102076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9777785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09353185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06101236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20563935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44267774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146464763","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Arthurs Report Twenty Years Later","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal education; Diversification (marketing strategy); Legal profession; Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Curriculum; Law; International Legal English Certificate; Political science; Jurisprudence; Hierarchy; Sociology; Comparative law; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.02152485885083002,"score_gpt":0.3466000919766249,"score_spread":0.3250752331257949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146464763","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033657933,0.02102106,0.00029462067,0.84154564,0.062225427,0.000025941663,0.00024574323,0.00003807658,0.07123758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.064402886,0.03496511,0.00061896245,0.4506986,0.03578901,0.000065557615,0.0002826645,0.00019704297,0.41298017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99024934,0.0017585594,0.00051674264,0.0011620258,0.0044959714,0.0018174802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985993,0.0040938878,0.00062491157,0.0007409764,0.006372825,0.0021743022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007261709,0.0006079137,0.0004806203,0.0024104088,0.008420356,0.008700048,0.0022660983,0.011938279,0.018420368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031312756,0.00046287684,0.00066905614,0.0018112685,0.007716726,0.0073207025,0.00393098,0.013032948,0.0060707885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012785131,0.00002894738,0.0008810054,0.00006598853,0.0000039697393,0.0003953313,0.0025938556,0.000018696197,0.0001209194,0.046140697,0.93369013,0.016047781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000131342,0.000004871633,0.0009017737,0.00013090296,0.0000021686376,0.00008787453,0.0017072273,0.000008133156,0.000067798115,0.0008147697,0.99626017,0.000013080281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23108563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25937524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23108563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011812063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021300418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45948112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146659683","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2014.00682.x","title":"Socio‐legal Scholarship in Canada: A Review of the Field","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Aotearoa; Scholarship; Field (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Regional science","score_opus":0.07271623548133417,"score_gpt":0.435153495430251,"score_spread":0.36243725994891685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146659683","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012251675,0.99727577,0.000020375808,0.0012895955,0.00024715054,0.000004141014,0.000023215662,0.0000021335595,0.0010151572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017935771,0.9972785,0.00009042748,0.00038485025,0.00011351994,0.0000049817763,0.000021183161,0.0000020165758,0.0003109386],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977943,0.00023859396,0.0001944504,0.00017506522,0.0013416369,0.00025604453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896259,0.0030043244,0.00066786323,0.00015095645,0.0055097146,0.0010413775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041385307,0.0009062234,0.0017540541,0.019969303,0.00456187,0.0062716138,0.0016573983,0.0024856972,0.0047377157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009016811,0.0005635972,0.00059847225,0.044894315,0.004597155,0.0032980698,0.0028795404,0.0022678906,0.00071228616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062187464,0.000106908155,0.0019988555,0.041537836,0.000119355565,0.000344956,0.003123619,0.0004930052,0.00037469037,0.034139033,0.15679744,0.7609021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007914283,0.000026659907,0.008999879,0.029156156,0.0000919185,0.00025768366,0.002014115,0.00007932353,0.00007577656,0.0023173667,0.9569305,0.000042774045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80579555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91738373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95626557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043734416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17529555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3906963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147312211","doi":"10.1093/ejil/cht040","title":"On the Annual Junior Faculty Forum for International Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Library science; Sociology; International law; Law; Political science; Media studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.04868430517455615,"score_gpt":0.36773562739823507,"score_spread":0.31905132222367893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147312211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060992376,0.0037251334,0.0034876335,0.06727291,0.17249572,0.0010034904,0.005370424,0.0026385142,0.73790693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012596966,0.0009006788,0.0015217761,0.007452896,0.022063004,0.00036714377,0.0018360106,0.00076149305,0.9524999],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969568,0.0004412402,0.00011724635,0.00035209733,0.0012596182,0.00087290653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917572,0.00049760216,0.0004062986,0.0004588872,0.0012529088,0.0056270086],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004915061,0.0011028675,0.000776165,0.0018633807,0.0052827443,0.009839222,0.0013981921,0.0043764464,0.3738636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007280391,0.00042897265,0.00069244794,0.0015186114,0.0012164831,0.004691618,0.008441072,0.004180713,0.18294892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018295636,0.00003673818,0.00009927477,0.000026062851,6.9590203e-7,0.000037305974,0.000097804084,0.0000097611055,0.0001974177,0.0036338402,0.98241884,0.013423942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040599334,0.000014274675,0.00033585232,0.00003738569,3.9172352e-7,0.000012237871,0.000092505325,0.000021992484,0.000043752298,0.00046338228,0.99896955,0.000004580269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015920125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005322897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3738636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024072153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004465829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8931076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148495171","doi":"10.1177/026975800601300302","title":"Injured in the Line of Duty: Is the Practice of Law Becoming a High Risk Occupation?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Victimology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Duty; Legal profession; Law; Qualitative research; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Public relations; Social science","score_opus":0.029947132117812712,"score_gpt":0.44117625116895315,"score_spread":0.41122911905114046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148495171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9590048,0.0023824798,0.00083808403,0.023796257,0.00012848477,0.000041812145,0.000019415362,0.00001068039,0.013777853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504614,0.0016591353,0.00024003384,0.001646724,0.000039252183,0.000020055204,0.00000970416,0.000006858801,0.0013320654],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871389,0.008142991,0.00044907228,0.00069133745,0.0016827986,0.0018949376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776407,0.011506624,0.0053049,0.00065243535,0.0016512843,0.003244107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073997313,0.00021436774,0.00071475445,0.0020384844,0.010383408,0.008847556,0.0021207319,0.0036746364,0.0027832189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029844431,0.00054834853,0.00018670208,0.0023398965,0.020502377,0.0068328027,0.0062334053,0.0043801484,0.0003472177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008045929,0.00004356168,0.00954694,0.000071258066,0.0000025794097,0.0005998414,0.9796922,0.0000061582414,0.00012735027,0.0025749465,0.0006072419,0.0067199306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.1645767e-7,0.000010336102,0.0020454926,0.00006623605,0.0000011971822,0.00020361067,0.9945221,0.0000068999598,0.00001561677,0.00028591426,0.0028389078,0.0000030241333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018097954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031536695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018097954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046626413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011342309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039134026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151541092","doi":"10.1017/s0075426913001201","title":"J. Miller Ed. Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: a Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011). Pp. 300. £58. 9780521514484.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Hellenic Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Content (measure theory); Theology; Classics; History; Philosophy; Media studies; Sociology; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.08726917920065426,"score_gpt":0.4039605062359768,"score_spread":0.31669132703532255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151541092","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040017825,0.89580065,0.0031280168,0.030511996,0.0035060418,0.000038750874,0.00030625128,0.00012768919,0.06618046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023612764,0.783629,0.013884618,0.009449935,0.0046628155,0.00030760467,0.0005141107,0.00044236897,0.16349682],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989183,0.00045459115,0.0000894931,0.00011590194,0.00034813667,0.00007344041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846005,0.0010071594,0.00012866606,0.00006434674,0.00025694672,0.00008283454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021225328,0.0019325836,0.0013068451,0.0049237064,0.003421091,0.0035229765,0.0017960243,0.003938171,0.029210417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041661807,0.0011793756,0.00067085,0.0035423252,0.004773131,0.0091718715,0.0018606272,0.004126786,0.011346352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057766625,0.000021943202,0.00012621445,0.00081240904,0.000013342943,0.00024418172,0.0029837152,0.0001807487,0.00013577015,0.08795365,0.78325695,0.12421329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007570499,0.000009740739,0.00042259195,0.0016518909,0.0000073127235,0.00036951655,0.0007936971,0.00007392713,0.00010208426,0.078931905,0.9176101,0.000019747817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017669508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035111804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029210417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003700482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042052977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0977186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153773064","doi":"10.7202/043380ar","title":"Sciences et droit : relation et rapports de force","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.029862100516336785,"score_gpt":0.3484811228485304,"score_spread":0.3186190223321936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153773064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11485496,0.005291339,0.011495208,0.017417641,0.00042174908,0.00011473019,0.00023109303,0.00009575942,0.8500775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9462802,0.0029541233,0.002693464,0.0014311961,0.0002870752,0.00013030933,0.00013582979,0.00011712802,0.045970675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875239,0.006102509,0.0004135414,0.001716307,0.0031106991,0.0011330436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678582,0.019568384,0.0052764774,0.0018420842,0.0031250275,0.0023299232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060432013,0.00062830746,0.0004263111,0.004511874,0.0056148213,0.009978665,0.0012719078,0.0028525451,0.04316024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027673988,0.00045888903,0.0007230958,0.003904634,0.021332268,0.009470502,0.007828261,0.0027917975,0.0035142894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001416266,0.00015315035,0.0329583,0.00043752516,0.000104443345,0.00083217665,0.15976988,0.0006577969,0.0010917161,0.72967553,0.008789705,0.065388225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001031941,0.00024550178,0.0637256,0.0014437985,0.000096052,0.0020047796,0.14190085,0.0011988737,0.00082127907,0.28347847,0.5048155,0.00016612021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011025663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069793374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04316024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004544075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038422334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14438534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155744514","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2015.2.8","title":"Incorporating a Creative Component in First-Year Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Creativity; Rubric; Originality; Law and literature; Psychology; Legal writing; The arts; Casebook; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Legal research; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.11533340429135934,"score_gpt":0.3847861013340781,"score_spread":0.26945269704271874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155744514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92163557,0.0003211571,0.006176625,0.0026363505,0.0001860867,0.0004176064,0.000055120818,0.00024524075,0.06832621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677298,0.00029689804,0.008553034,0.00091996446,0.000056304263,0.00024350165,0.00004969682,0.000058490135,0.022092316],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956455,0.0017489959,0.00019125424,0.00033658807,0.0010765415,0.0010011673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879764,0.0034452647,0.0014271673,0.0012876149,0.0008953999,0.0049681216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004977523,0.00046807367,0.0003065729,0.0012501476,0.0040351176,0.007637463,0.0015126949,0.0019294075,0.020547763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01268712,0.00043611214,0.0006796916,0.0005008486,0.004260239,0.0035380793,0.008259582,0.0025155977,0.0027035484],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031834893,0.009876907,0.1132402,0.0013819358,0.000045169956,0.004941274,0.27153093,0.0008476813,0.020716209,0.049755726,0.035324827,0.49202085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024618622,0.0036021792,0.16706686,0.0010303576,0.00006431418,0.006799089,0.2232225,0.0021262784,0.012693912,0.02484845,0.5580621,0.0002377741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005646494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025871065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020547763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010185941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00198058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068739176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156836974","doi":"10.1017/s1472669605000630","title":"AALL 2004 – a Boston Beano","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Exhibition; Quarter (Canadian coin); Nephew and niece; Sitting; Lift (data mining); History; Media studies; Art; Political science; Art history; Sociology; Medicine; Advertising; Law; Archaeology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.01737800081076983,"score_gpt":0.3336951625272107,"score_spread":0.31631716171644086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156836974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023051316,0.008543149,0.0009363729,0.02559093,0.01339928,0.00010302699,0.0025643602,0.0008681773,0.9456897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013882235,0.0005405441,0.00015291458,0.00067200337,0.00024855518,0.000010171198,0.00040244465,0.00010559889,0.9964797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931085,0.000078717356,0.0000271477,0.0001461883,0.00031552382,0.00012157452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879164,0.000060251692,0.000056924833,0.00011496732,0.00048309294,0.00049321435],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012358334,0.00057492807,0.000366882,0.00107365,0.0027280853,0.0065696905,0.0010637353,0.0024756594,0.57688564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015175331,0.00035502715,0.00038177875,0.0010737015,0.0005921933,0.002226889,0.0016381168,0.001892242,0.35412943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005161686,0.000034946934,0.00029070766,0.000034378863,0.0000035104447,0.00014443004,0.00006425826,0.000041141247,0.00041537438,0.0030465918,0.9643577,0.031515256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021160142,0.000004668532,0.0003019329,0.000019125358,5.6543803e-7,0.000018350102,0.000038791342,0.000019242025,0.00004190346,0.000118902375,0.9994326,0.0000017084882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033056702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1223817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57688564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003836762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032158238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6035212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158042753","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2926","title":"The lawyer as fiduciary: Defining private law duties in public law relations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Law; Obligation; Discretion; Normative; Political science; Private law; Trust law; Sociology; Law and economics; Public law","score_opus":0.05001110103854751,"score_gpt":0.31067836116635655,"score_spread":0.26066726012780905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158042753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22530976,0.009806322,0.09410954,0.065909974,0.000550244,0.00018067866,0.00005271183,0.00008569939,0.6039951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98793834,0.0008374058,0.0037470895,0.0017278052,0.00023588825,0.00006699939,0.000012925775,0.00003756455,0.005396002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990462,0.0051982254,0.0004046973,0.00063898816,0.001850579,0.0014454795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884694,0.006884976,0.0014163484,0.0013253603,0.00079809595,0.0011058471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069301403,0.00031328382,0.0005788109,0.0029444906,0.010329663,0.02206634,0.001520911,0.009886887,0.0035742312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014055352,0.00062869204,0.00054098887,0.0027557034,0.065846466,0.027147489,0.008735197,0.007900845,0.00064311444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003890355,0.000021896472,0.00040633976,0.00001248485,9.716393e-7,0.00004791829,0.0107637495,0.0000547208,0.000049005255,0.9852461,0.0003616491,0.0030313798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009120732,0.000023925339,0.0017857783,0.00021380011,0.000004847908,0.00023407792,0.015222874,0.0010229594,0.00015710018,0.94841945,0.032886058,0.000020055655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069015105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005951766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02206634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011480167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007864013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08329481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158286611","doi":"","title":"Buyers' Remorse? An Empirical Assessment of the Desirability of a Legal Career","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Remorse; Optimism; Debt; Legal education; Psychology; Ambivalence; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.050693459449060854,"score_gpt":0.41254423371531906,"score_spread":0.3618507742662582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158286611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783982,0.00041769253,0.00043298822,0.0012427174,0.00003455744,0.000049533075,0.00011553869,0.000007167481,0.019301644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982243,0.00010106856,0.00012340372,0.00008962242,0.0000324215,0.000010608356,0.00005531813,0.0000029910086,0.0013602518],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917475,0.00470317,0.000788705,0.00043260108,0.0017265965,0.00060150994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8197172,0.10181947,0.04815352,0.0078062722,0.009663114,0.012840362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022081213,0.00021342757,0.00039904608,0.0022605655,0.0015155367,0.0036787519,0.0017047549,0.0016433954,0.010534398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10758805,0.00024677365,0.0006529245,0.001102827,0.0039233696,0.0028571032,0.0021047785,0.0025631692,0.0011072329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030364495,0.0004618619,0.97838634,0.00006284057,0.00014232434,0.00027949936,0.0037394497,0.00032603944,0.00012706679,0.003321113,0.00058785046,0.01226206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006173207,0.00083993125,0.968568,0.0001405473,0.00007117362,0.000802186,0.020153092,0.0016769309,0.00024803047,0.003088837,0.0043058177,0.000043714095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014314804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015154991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022081213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009791128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008260093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116778016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158543786","doi":"10.1061/(asce)1943-4162(2009)1:2(67)","title":"Teaching Law on Engineering and Construction Programs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Patience; Publication; Dispute resolution; Revelation; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.009108507558005574,"score_gpt":0.2661414183617926,"score_spread":0.25703291080378704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158543786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01898352,0.025846489,0.008171573,0.3605147,0.005878435,0.000069683716,0.00011739066,0.00037035558,0.58004797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35850397,0.02849333,0.005856519,0.0828325,0.0053003184,0.00014245743,0.00018032186,0.00033121285,0.5183594],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966698,0.0011033564,0.00011854768,0.00028357783,0.0012258352,0.0005989064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943112,0.0026396743,0.00040703194,0.0003592116,0.0006504798,0.0016323418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003163303,0.00041690064,0.00036354415,0.0011665074,0.0057023834,0.005967373,0.0009084179,0.0033068655,0.031915434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009071782,0.00039069395,0.00031332625,0.0011307287,0.010432738,0.0048447247,0.0043026735,0.006757684,0.0057024756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011771607,0.00018412646,0.0024842191,0.00021910791,0.0000043028763,0.0001637856,0.011304004,0.00026542685,0.00063120446,0.33508202,0.5085149,0.14113513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030952574,0.000028453009,0.0024330444,0.00028187802,0.0000018300794,0.000092201815,0.0050546965,0.00013398586,0.00030223624,0.023021502,0.96863997,0.0000070982824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015793068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046247803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031915434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009557286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016765906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106767714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159932472","doi":"10.1017/s0021855306000052","title":"DISCRETION, <i>NOLLE PROSEQUI</i> AND THE 1992 GHANAIAN CONSTITUTION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Accountability; Constitution; Law; Commonwealth; Political science; Subject (documents); Judicial discretion; Power (physics); Judicial review; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012635526996633837,"score_gpt":0.2999441574947578,"score_spread":0.28730863049812394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159932472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09612377,0.02045831,0.0090317195,0.14329268,0.0025066368,0.0002910209,0.0011534004,0.00011866338,0.72702384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79342407,0.0038232328,0.006695345,0.044065986,0.00059140305,0.00043223612,0.0004058276,0.000055860506,0.15050602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975211,0.00069563143,0.00017063724,0.00032035485,0.0006356931,0.0006564904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985862,0.00054287695,0.0003980409,0.00011052559,0.0002099176,0.0001524635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017386557,0.00026392087,0.0002088355,0.00047133,0.0032326533,0.0029624414,0.00042799462,0.0031909568,0.0073314384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058510257,0.00022466171,0.00021301892,0.0007558017,0.0068423813,0.0018045437,0.0020996341,0.0036660067,0.00083293975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004174342,0.0000131975685,0.0015609182,0.00007806556,0.0000035604442,0.00038665035,0.0041109915,0.00014691977,0.00048377312,0.94870126,0.03349111,0.0109818345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007280698,0.000057120047,0.010928137,0.000403546,0.000015268042,0.00047374982,0.0017225466,0.00016728662,0.00051457586,0.11937174,0.86623037,0.000042885717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080692746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12805009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080692746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054303156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009621572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1604461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21605983","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001498","title":"Student Participation in Legal Education in Germany and Europe","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bologna Process; Curriculum; Political science; Parliament; German; Competence (human resources); Legal education; Higher education; Public relations; Pedagogy; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02568255837110394,"score_gpt":0.4457869831115504,"score_spread":0.42010442474044646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21605983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96989125,0.001532334,0.00017397541,0.0052936557,0.00014773862,0.0000147154005,0.00020874242,0.000019338195,0.022718225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99409926,0.000354115,0.000051253006,0.00046593085,0.00002837216,0.0000075692615,0.00011375662,0.0000056423837,0.004874211],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958781,0.0011064013,0.00018178528,0.00045527396,0.000748701,0.0016296619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99625,0.0006248777,0.0006137485,0.00012940212,0.00025461853,0.002127314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033958633,0.00017731839,0.00034126072,0.0021380933,0.0016281961,0.004263001,0.00062426674,0.0015252299,0.0057275523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047743297,0.00015730316,0.00028442655,0.0024187036,0.0022683449,0.0019086784,0.0048847217,0.0011404303,0.00050295214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006579445,0.0011835468,0.52704453,0.0003222718,0.0001728755,0.0016697366,0.06924688,0.00089362793,0.0012031589,0.12329502,0.028017875,0.24629262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060896025,0.00030470785,0.7843972,0.00040674815,0.000037010053,0.0010341502,0.038674023,0.000865564,0.0007979548,0.0035810843,0.1697641,0.00007662089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011918604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009281539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011918604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027432393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002443804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02369845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161933683","doi":"","title":"What Lies Before, Behind and Beneath a Case? Five Minutes on Transnational Lawyering and the Consequences for Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Context (archaeology); Curriculum; Politics; Political science; Plaintiff; Law; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Sociology; Legal profession; Law and economics; History","score_opus":0.02423894359986444,"score_gpt":0.31572912463788577,"score_spread":0.2914901810380213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161933683","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008222345,0.16855046,0.003080518,0.5999289,0.10824062,0.00015051043,0.0003269444,0.00017581489,0.11132398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22014973,0.109528646,0.005451874,0.2527596,0.06886212,0.00033536856,0.00056124973,0.0005038906,0.3418475],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959998,0.0025314984,0.00011944702,0.00025822956,0.00064512005,0.0004460165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951271,0.0031939028,0.00017800217,0.0001895087,0.00042363553,0.00088774745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041586645,0.0010010388,0.0005933628,0.0011427271,0.0063416525,0.0066829994,0.0012596893,0.0050246147,0.019806704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009017778,0.0003922939,0.0006289779,0.0010318373,0.008492062,0.009073553,0.004028904,0.00793347,0.002789637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007103395,0.000045043587,0.00032356143,0.00025390417,0.000009664713,0.00041982377,0.022655465,0.00014774338,0.0004241362,0.08313636,0.85585153,0.036661774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006795326,0.000045002624,0.00058219983,0.0005982685,0.0000036015508,0.00018229436,0.017958004,0.00006765727,0.00008635524,0.017486645,0.9629602,0.000022924627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013054901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030686062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019806704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062382254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033396597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06626004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162727364","doi":"10.3138/cjls.26.3.613","title":"Accessing Democracy: The Critical Relationship between Academics and the Access to Information Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Government (linguistics); Parliament; Freedom of information; Legislation; Political science; Democracy; Public administration; Globe; Politics; Access to information; Information access; Public relations; Business; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.10328233018555673,"score_gpt":0.3777199630890826,"score_spread":0.2744376329035259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162727364","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045670025,0.018406278,0.002485467,0.47780192,0.0011485423,0.00004670853,0.00004744472,0.000031960866,0.45436156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95746636,0.004756021,0.00046036107,0.023324948,0.0012080115,0.000042913336,0.000015705438,0.000032250155,0.012693413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9695566,0.018711679,0.00060768443,0.0014106929,0.005089542,0.0046236888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9311842,0.0516481,0.0043048253,0.0022344047,0.005242703,0.005385837],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0246508,0.00029908548,0.0005085034,0.0038762873,0.04166075,0.028355086,0.0018403025,0.009085823,0.0037424627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049212318,0.00037498755,0.0003304695,0.005865021,0.13781884,0.0196378,0.011102772,0.016560506,0.00043832313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007179321,0.000008524882,0.00028863974,0.000015172425,0.0000012434856,0.00005680597,0.02779129,0.000026959722,0.0000125081515,0.96508205,0.004638195,0.0020714372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026626682,0.000021570617,0.0017876873,0.00035144459,0.0000076179776,0.000094721014,0.052508436,0.00016673052,0.0001878614,0.6517001,0.29311332,0.00003397025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13896696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10679398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97164494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053670995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048054766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38941216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163233513","doi":"","title":"Lawyers of Colour and Racialized Immigrants with Foreign Legal Degrees: An Examination of the Institutionalized Processes of Social Nullification","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of criminology and sociological theory","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Diversity (politics); Deconstruction (building); Politics; Multiculturalism; Immigration; Law; Nullification; Sociology; Contingency; Law and economics; Political science; Action (physics); Public relations; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09011427134451895,"score_gpt":0.3887672001878797,"score_spread":0.29865292884336075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163233513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99242145,0.0000981928,0.00007306916,0.001537293,0.000009815119,0.000011263396,0.000003900537,0.0000010935337,0.005843894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884605,0.00006850696,0.000038429545,0.00024709062,0.0000060810867,0.000008358521,0.0000030156318,9.126908e-7,0.0007816112],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948761,0.0023723415,0.00009312736,0.0002707615,0.0006825235,0.0017051693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99185,0.0037307783,0.0019023948,0.0003725154,0.0010521213,0.0010921325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051517016,0.00021720823,0.00036894457,0.0020733727,0.014464225,0.0052638124,0.0011923782,0.0014849663,0.0043549715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015141533,0.0002230139,0.00023481945,0.0015347346,0.018431766,0.0022466488,0.009642282,0.002045465,0.000171229],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055170585,0.00016049044,0.06820615,0.000021950955,0.000008685518,0.00043187095,0.90164727,0.000026359136,0.00033547694,0.021670941,0.00038529973,0.0070503023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011181676,0.000039346665,0.042104572,0.00004677642,0.000011049909,0.00011578257,0.9521319,0.000112814465,0.00010876352,0.0015846987,0.0037201322,0.0000129375285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2448376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41266388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2448376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011201271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016367106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48682493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167159390","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00268.x","title":"Social Capital and Constraints on Legal Careers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Individual capital; Prestige; Social mobility; Social reproduction; Social status; Sociology; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Capital (architecture); Economic capital; Positive economics; Social psychology; Economics; Social science; Psychology; Economic growth; Human capital","score_opus":0.036560825825718804,"score_gpt":0.3748328916741761,"score_spread":0.3382720658484573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167159390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9293647,0.0021760606,0.0006098628,0.004065052,0.00002536093,0.000015724001,0.00007473923,0.0000060791745,0.06366248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780875,0.00055806997,0.00008108785,0.000060281673,0.000023652658,0.0000042082725,0.00001661261,0.0000011340744,0.0014462663],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769044,0.0009309048,0.00007612942,0.00013034938,0.000548432,0.00062381575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859372,0.004579444,0.003758655,0.0003218299,0.0009364521,0.004466372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016703177,0.000103658116,0.00022207266,0.0010982528,0.0019851802,0.002090781,0.00038311954,0.00049611967,0.008201276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011094985,0.00010205588,0.0001422782,0.0011243563,0.0021562192,0.0009706588,0.0020019752,0.00057257246,0.00042881118],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022229886,0.0007342956,0.6301797,0.0002799886,0.00012301507,0.001738076,0.013727977,0.0017464428,0.0011709172,0.13383299,0.004806386,0.21143807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035693174,0.00022635717,0.90189934,0.00039996294,0.000034195164,0.0009897676,0.020055953,0.0010460372,0.00022315278,0.037822574,0.037232477,0.000034481243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052853413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017193325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008201276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001626042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022978694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027435958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168127562","doi":"10.7202/043043ar","title":"Does Section 7 of the Charter Protect the Right to be a Professional?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Law; Commission; Section (typography); Political science; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.013512202873371452,"score_gpt":0.3115571086391603,"score_spread":0.29804490576578885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168127562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017327491,0.0061597927,0.0036883703,0.4400845,0.0034225867,0.000096693475,0.00027387406,0.00009006653,0.52885675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46142104,0.008798543,0.006278818,0.39071807,0.0030812486,0.00021976288,0.000356151,0.00011337447,0.12901293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754543,0.003636785,0.00080057286,0.0012410203,0.012034457,0.0068328413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859913,0.0058136485,0.0012383333,0.0007181455,0.005115184,0.001123428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014790082,0.00039520822,0.00079817604,0.0009988782,0.009249873,0.009334136,0.0034315847,0.01518711,0.006372921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035029273,0.0005199939,0.0008168615,0.001189813,0.01897348,0.0060792915,0.00246124,0.013955389,0.0021771768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016515594,0.000017999442,0.00081521086,0.00004921912,0.0000071887607,0.000089257344,0.0036079173,0.00013591585,0.00019825622,0.92478466,0.06069775,0.009580108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045471294,0.00007835619,0.0056126323,0.001084518,0.00004072108,0.00016165605,0.007990022,0.0004383826,0.000895971,0.15238883,0.8310842,0.0001791649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67978865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.743174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67978865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020999959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09052779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64419425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170039425","doi":"10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.44.61","title":"A Comparative Study of Judicial Control in Iran, U.S.A and Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Secrecy; Accountability; Economic Justice; Supervisor; Control (management); Judicial review; Monopoly; Law; Language change; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.06776676158916817,"score_gpt":0.38355423183442583,"score_spread":0.31578747024525766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170039425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599436,0.0009830589,0.00010330807,0.0018012926,0.000037987484,0.000047034875,0.00042127326,0.000014713966,0.03664782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99657696,0.0004962809,0.000077923636,0.00016296067,0.000007507602,0.0000065332015,0.00013545703,0.000004375121,0.0025319634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609226,0.00029615551,0.00010555481,0.0002545032,0.0017055011,0.0015459736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99176437,0.00084978464,0.0010522401,0.00014905732,0.0046392754,0.0015452744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015435155,0.00020055677,0.00036387148,0.0038092807,0.008572272,0.0028527025,0.001028182,0.0006200682,0.0037093633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008885504,0.0001929444,0.00026774587,0.007418669,0.003837061,0.0005637473,0.0010851899,0.0010876588,0.00023604216],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049525884,0.00042820506,0.72674423,0.00028390024,0.00019744065,0.002405735,0.0733368,0.0017933564,0.0017310589,0.06145152,0.03740228,0.09373028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036541966,0.00008483688,0.9133042,0.00009808971,0.000040246836,0.00022658016,0.05606234,0.00089204864,0.00029422774,0.0005427914,0.028361669,0.00005639741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99574786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05890395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05890395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.082562365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42738003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174156855","doi":"","title":"Student Perspectives on Legal Education: A Longitudinal Empirical Evaluation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.07154966653307505,"score_gpt":0.4846964851039078,"score_spread":0.41314681857083274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174156855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99790156,0.00011220048,0.00009859942,0.00022943469,0.000018263307,0.000071763876,0.00021591599,0.000005012002,0.0013472086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734855,0.00017436697,0.00015333777,0.00015109284,0.000022679526,0.00020613003,0.0004771035,0.0000089817,0.0014576496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873585,0.006293776,0.00089380704,0.000852403,0.0029404901,0.0016610237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9145816,0.03201885,0.017693909,0.00499305,0.01847406,0.012238593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022545489,0.00043146982,0.0009972712,0.005065121,0.004369361,0.006323023,0.0016264127,0.0025284041,0.0058407774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06750041,0.0007899845,0.0010779651,0.00420056,0.0023484477,0.0059744795,0.0057642516,0.0043576625,0.002094549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047165534,0.0057341903,0.9509659,0.00004961799,0.00006589591,0.00010744166,0.029198041,0.00007575847,0.00012015819,0.00037487593,0.00069825834,0.012138245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104888364,0.003547878,0.91943425,0.0001456342,0.0001204547,0.00015323616,0.07086653,0.00049407105,0.0007175124,0.00043976607,0.0039010022,0.00007489445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010802173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01484527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022545489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003050808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005702778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11923337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174160031","doi":"","title":"Twenty Years of Student Scholarship: Celebrating the Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Champion; Editorial board; Law; Theme (computing); Scholarship; Van Dyke beard; Sociology; Management; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.08876129895759702,"score_gpt":0.3814368503961834,"score_spread":0.29267555143858637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174160031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013324904,0.066775404,0.0002926295,0.7935583,0.06272934,0.00001677973,0.00008239824,0.000102659185,0.06311761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26076674,0.05462256,0.0015747715,0.23549436,0.06317027,0.00013002112,0.00021351133,0.0003152936,0.38371253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99172336,0.001933334,0.00024177866,0.00050136657,0.0030382548,0.0025619476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712782,0.002501347,0.0008457902,0.00088481634,0.0035536666,0.02093621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012718761,0.00057312613,0.0006738096,0.00259498,0.020730967,0.029113311,0.002110009,0.008553408,0.011874923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013681382,0.00039685657,0.00030401535,0.0025393555,0.015358057,0.010824844,0.014279,0.012342097,0.00215898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027016125,0.000097414326,0.0012715836,0.00010590353,0.000008001137,0.00027502837,0.0122126,0.000033300068,0.0001226834,0.056025315,0.8886594,0.041161805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003149999,0.000017339045,0.0012565294,0.00009691125,0.0000017683261,0.000048572194,0.006640777,0.000017110193,0.00003144232,0.0023202708,0.98955274,0.0000133993935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033359244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14185305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033359244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014883506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036940943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10798788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177332101","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1213","title":"Book Review: Lawyers Gone Bad: Money, Sex and Madness in Canada's Legal Profession, by Philip Stayton","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018064852333683924,"score_gpt":0.31290687390916416,"score_spread":0.29484202157548023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177332101","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000101795835,0.95573384,0.000027121969,0.027351264,0.008425746,0.000024578438,0.0002547617,0.000015601772,0.008065234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018827328,0.94435734,0.000081841565,0.017311731,0.005974415,0.00004590541,0.00034783458,0.000020864392,0.029977348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992136,0.00009307282,0.00004551954,0.000081877915,0.0004874305,0.000078534984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528044,0.0013833452,0.00025578213,0.00006651922,0.002425021,0.00058881583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087722536,0.0008192791,0.0014922055,0.0028443902,0.0019085148,0.0042922124,0.0018155903,0.0029805636,0.03320233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073989225,0.0005661044,0.00036139018,0.008879959,0.0019544526,0.0026310782,0.00084315834,0.0039767115,0.007124548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008627937,0.0000045687534,0.000053995525,0.0009225287,0.0000050293497,0.000013501817,0.00003177077,0.000018775618,0.000010465554,0.00031972094,0.9809373,0.017673733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018212675,0.0000133492895,0.0015300607,0.0046936204,0.000021240325,0.00017139887,0.00016096582,0.000018746257,0.000013418674,0.00025898014,0.99308634,0.00001363745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34345657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6395438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65654343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011548331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02883354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68291485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182702202","doi":"","title":"The Women Lawyers Forum is having a Launch Party on June 5 th - and you're invited!","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Political science; Law; History; Library science; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.03330211264235411,"score_gpt":0.34643417462192005,"score_spread":0.31313206197956595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182702202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0103552025,0.0033002028,0.0028435655,0.18699689,0.082216404,0.0008855091,0.0038108835,0.0034069864,0.70618445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015044495,0.0004558355,0.0015315369,0.010253576,0.0029930738,0.00023886771,0.000768247,0.00059437024,0.96812004],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983625,0.00028042757,0.00002587776,0.00013677082,0.00051860313,0.0006759082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99559647,0.00037400413,0.00012769976,0.00014643642,0.00057443255,0.003180979],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030422937,0.0006423756,0.0004280291,0.0007712969,0.011726014,0.0064231707,0.00094693084,0.0048473,0.32043856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005459399,0.00041184947,0.00073089363,0.00047484026,0.0017075512,0.0031492857,0.0042843823,0.0073412172,0.085851006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057511537,0.000056218196,0.0003398225,0.000039210634,0.0000026116563,0.0001769491,0.0009852985,0.000008384905,0.00043518536,0.0028507225,0.9795517,0.015496383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005774768,0.000022387834,0.00086673134,0.000030152138,0.0000010070726,0.000020070294,0.0010961711,0.000008695856,0.00010690758,0.00021075667,0.99762374,0.000007686232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022580469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091271795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32043856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024729194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036400452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9693119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W218311014","doi":"","title":"Revising Canada's Ethical Rules for Judges Returning to Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Economic Justice; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Practice of law; Subject (documents); Sociology; Legal profession; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.044098762609800175,"score_gpt":0.3789727393282665,"score_spread":0.3348739767184663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W218311014","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050322242,0.008148886,0.023865988,0.5957636,0.0068693375,0.001251759,0.00068338896,0.00042783114,0.31266698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6035156,0.007753965,0.08442758,0.15875885,0.00196699,0.0009521644,0.0005270232,0.00036028228,0.1417376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89978045,0.016072068,0.0074119754,0.006156942,0.05399225,0.0165864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8128367,0.05212158,0.0057063475,0.0060538277,0.10598789,0.017293714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055763204,0.00075927,0.0009994684,0.0042484445,0.029458208,0.020649353,0.0068655824,0.01427643,0.002361909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13015188,0.0012589691,0.0010960668,0.0031945126,0.017630385,0.0043802545,0.0049286033,0.016652089,0.00079712336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040684125,0.0000735489,0.008767504,0.00021382334,0.00002986856,0.00061232265,0.029109845,0.001506925,0.0007776981,0.5577278,0.35123277,0.04990724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008371168,0.00006377748,0.015778579,0.0015599296,0.000099028475,0.00037049278,0.022753134,0.0027059703,0.0011871359,0.057289038,0.89765537,0.0004538091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9630709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98430264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8713806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12861939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44445443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93320334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183623604","doi":"","title":"An Exploration on the Construction and Improvement of Administrative Legal Supervision Mechanism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Legitimacy; Administrative law; Business; Power (physics); Independence (probability theory); Administration (probate law); Law; Public administration; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.15560211855913025,"score_gpt":0.4070308589979758,"score_spread":0.25142874043884555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183623604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30651343,0.0054266043,0.2709227,0.038957067,0.00066116476,0.0016065853,0.00012515279,0.0006191747,0.37516814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513605,0.0011331674,0.038245294,0.00057437905,0.00009177815,0.0002816536,0.000040533614,0.00003141295,0.00824126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858537,0.006853891,0.0008169304,0.0010953709,0.0035644793,0.00181576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98688763,0.004296431,0.0023341354,0.0016622088,0.003395653,0.001423958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016980749,0.00032257702,0.00039836325,0.002846746,0.003977949,0.0069744545,0.00202487,0.0021456012,0.0048043756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02224792,0.00044632307,0.0007789551,0.001544669,0.010191127,0.009926085,0.00400806,0.0022066599,0.00043859988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020120322,0.00008433289,0.007852494,0.00015423779,0.000011005824,0.00020499509,0.0042044516,0.0008969595,0.00056530244,0.9440065,0.0016616792,0.040337965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001596646,0.0004887578,0.03768919,0.0021508622,0.00014405235,0.0012540044,0.021625398,0.027225165,0.0043063816,0.6701608,0.23459911,0.00019661534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058303066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005043533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016980749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067632333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024932114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089803874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184207463","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1229","title":"Book Notes: Raising the Bar: The Emerging Legal Profession in East Asia, by William P. Alford (ed)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Bar (unit); Law; Political science; East Asia; Engineering; Geography; Mechanical engineering; China; Meteorology","score_opus":0.03258198195336577,"score_gpt":0.3700367816752486,"score_spread":0.33745479972188286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184207463","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008627248,0.63209414,0.0014519366,0.22164147,0.027018992,0.000032409847,0.00029718055,0.00012882389,0.11647234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0093529,0.5058576,0.0020038157,0.051370982,0.02093598,0.00006793696,0.00036030277,0.000113328795,0.40993714],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996816,0.00007864809,0.000018627366,0.000039408274,0.00014986371,0.00003185775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990232,0.0005111538,0.000052454776,0.000025463145,0.000268843,0.00011901881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008094145,0.0010651194,0.000551292,0.0020685676,0.0033119253,0.00528084,0.0010601135,0.003977635,0.023393583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015598476,0.00050240953,0.00037803684,0.0031819982,0.0025566686,0.0074273176,0.0012525056,0.0034666013,0.011788604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037797295,0.0000069311272,0.00009797036,0.00007518485,0.0000014525898,0.000027679518,0.0003716134,0.000037278387,0.0000322708,0.0052691717,0.9689883,0.025088409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004000255,0.000007952522,0.0008330135,0.00054070883,0.000005067813,0.00015120616,0.0014482185,0.00006513836,0.00007362183,0.007409619,0.9894504,0.000011062621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039590556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14247659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039590556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017226419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031681422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07872027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184355122","doi":"","title":"Poor Students, Well-Paid Lawyers: Post-Graduation Income-Contingent Tuition Fees for Law Schools","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Student debt; Government (linguistics); Subsidy; Debt; Obligation; Economics; Business; Labour economics; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.017610360077308373,"score_gpt":0.3602725144580236,"score_spread":0.34266215438071523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184355122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429674,0.00095816987,0.0012242973,0.026851539,0.000042500917,0.00007933745,0.0004084026,0.000035373614,0.027432963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976285,0.0002141379,0.00010391991,0.00031825068,0.000008704926,0.000006534415,0.000040354487,0.000002911925,0.0016766955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982753,0.0002785526,0.00002748429,0.00011421945,0.00024789965,0.0010565653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590683,0.00070420874,0.001195133,0.0001481357,0.00043680452,0.0016088362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011784206,0.0002642084,0.000691505,0.0010810652,0.0047313836,0.0041494127,0.0010856009,0.002564736,0.0038303414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051539526,0.00032503027,0.00039160793,0.0016144095,0.0033358748,0.0018176326,0.0025059793,0.003076759,0.00023282286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002862476,0.0007483544,0.7277913,0.00013002126,0.00006770129,0.0021518269,0.009923479,0.0042556245,0.00042594044,0.16122776,0.020308109,0.07268358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014249164,0.00026928962,0.83572716,0.00033258478,0.0003215312,0.0012270154,0.038185693,0.018549157,0.0005485797,0.07317923,0.031388592,0.00012862262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67573154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78985584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67573154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017994989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015936043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65235627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184399030","doi":"","title":"Canadian Council of Parliamentary Ombudsman (CCPO) Conference","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Legislature; Political science; Overcrowding; Legislative assembly; Public administration; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.09592008218230637,"score_gpt":0.3519422608606551,"score_spread":0.25602217867834876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184399030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01092697,0.022111189,0.0013571588,0.34263968,0.058034033,0.00096555415,0.0060684783,0.00039737977,0.5574996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053159546,0.010384793,0.0028587803,0.049848042,0.0032234883,0.00044202624,0.0028248914,0.0002763076,0.8769821],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857333,0.0010550349,0.0003809148,0.0007949151,0.0072535835,0.0047821747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98036146,0.000728568,0.00034973148,0.0003495451,0.010576332,0.007634319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009000013,0.0008166634,0.0007903907,0.0028168033,0.017041547,0.0074563297,0.0028385078,0.006112266,0.077891104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012647956,0.00068878167,0.001057073,0.0029883476,0.0022180027,0.0013354071,0.0039231107,0.005939025,0.011739748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024756717,0.000027949744,0.00066622975,0.00007557739,0.000007760831,0.00012057874,0.0003058384,0.00004450828,0.00014511918,0.004789787,0.9787273,0.015064585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039664624,0.0000034137033,0.0015349746,0.00005651818,0.0000026239225,0.000015222008,0.0003038751,0.000018998751,0.000039834773,0.00013937823,0.9978713,0.000009891038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92022914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97078776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92494434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07505567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2761058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5445696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185093975","doi":"","title":"ACTION RESEARCH: TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MOTION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Action research; Work (physics); Foundation (evidence); Public administration; Public relations; Library science; Management; Law; Engineering; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.4416218525598942,"score_gpt":0.5427644111011497,"score_spread":0.10114255854125548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185093975","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046444526,0.020089483,0.37959597,0.3383591,0.0080408715,0.0021676288,0.00032050774,0.0022397013,0.24454227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17386407,0.022923598,0.6946953,0.045029707,0.0034212002,0.008155635,0.0006634308,0.001031352,0.050215766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8924052,0.09196787,0.0028619927,0.0039333645,0.0070695304,0.001761987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8353376,0.114598304,0.0040441076,0.0246388,0.008206608,0.013174543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.109442316,0.0022159996,0.0022187214,0.0042056316,0.008521079,0.023876479,0.0055226376,0.011094973,0.017057208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095125176,0.0016110421,0.001682024,0.0038178149,0.05361352,0.014917087,0.014161065,0.014800147,0.009665746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000665541,0.00037900428,0.0011689869,0.0018461721,0.00010192127,0.00034461412,0.037059385,0.001446885,0.00060988177,0.5612088,0.16210414,0.23366365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009267357,0.000116795294,0.0004825262,0.003377087,0.000029030478,0.00022937999,0.014566036,0.001026271,0.00033395275,0.57011783,0.409571,0.000057360532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032762105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004022507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109442316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068831253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031287063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57879317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185433022","doi":"","title":"Ministère de la Justice Canada","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Law","score_opus":0.04467924368519922,"score_gpt":0.35966986649896693,"score_spread":0.3149906228137677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185433022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011118988,0.018334294,0.0013963276,0.34121862,0.01369603,0.0009819296,0.011297279,0.00088230637,0.6010743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025297886,0.002569247,0.0011254097,0.03294208,0.0007588001,0.00023570226,0.0010575372,0.00014275273,0.93587065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98447126,0.0009014573,0.00065397884,0.001009038,0.007342991,0.0056211953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832064,0.0022927716,0.00042972335,0.000624063,0.010425715,0.0030213932],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006068804,0.0012085703,0.0018651303,0.003648156,0.013314833,0.008682915,0.0031376905,0.018127974,0.068294086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017416598,0.0015382144,0.0014753612,0.0025123705,0.0020534797,0.0025850344,0.0037363821,0.017692382,0.008882837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109017354,0.00010821777,0.0018553155,0.0002219081,0.000056152603,0.00025894522,0.00064975116,0.0002155049,0.00043636851,0.16412628,0.8147663,0.017196247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007949788,0.000018323053,0.005073991,0.00017538329,0.000027623615,0.00006681304,0.00025655792,0.00020959506,0.0001627056,0.002798201,0.9910869,0.00004427137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9556677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9652294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9317059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061496805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27341816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44619268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185929987","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of Sexual Harassment Case Law in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026691242199869264,"score_gpt":0.3391945409601972,"score_spread":0.3125032987603279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185929987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8891052,0.0034245118,0.0006980346,0.037437443,0.0001785707,0.00008885574,0.0008107763,0.00005459114,0.06820211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862729,0.0010792547,0.00029951392,0.0011487637,0.00002141102,0.000008726754,0.00015186517,0.000029288653,0.010988358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593806,0.00047094806,0.00010989157,0.00043473218,0.0012757533,0.0017706397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97935665,0.0027151199,0.0015808998,0.000532296,0.010205036,0.005610108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026998431,0.0001800086,0.00046519176,0.004806246,0.012644097,0.007830082,0.0024586176,0.002621375,0.01174366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018004179,0.00059449556,0.00044261027,0.00542103,0.0068361755,0.0017446473,0.0025416198,0.0036471717,0.00045024476],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004074324,0.0006175712,0.45662138,0.00022575482,0.00018350621,0.0022871797,0.06519449,0.0052658785,0.0020561358,0.23179637,0.048732266,0.18661204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006893637,0.00008049032,0.7946631,0.00036336322,0.00006349257,0.00050533965,0.046252087,0.004429654,0.00066002406,0.006553103,0.14621052,0.00015002134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20298173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20298173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22229049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9244282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2188068900","doi":"","title":"Best Practices and Recommendations for Patient Care Complaints Management within the Vancouver Island Health Authority","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Best practice; Health care; Nursing; Business; Medicine; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0751873828736809,"score_gpt":0.38299284035004816,"score_spread":0.30780545747636723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2188068900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102467276,0.042283554,0.04160731,0.6771787,0.0025612607,0.006388568,0.00070682465,0.0016142611,0.12519224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50249225,0.070930645,0.3619152,0.024222571,0.000502797,0.005597644,0.0015779103,0.00034026804,0.03242063],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88388723,0.07659567,0.009275628,0.0022452243,0.020376394,0.0076198154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85264754,0.06072814,0.009287412,0.0061702724,0.05377627,0.017390449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07210579,0.0012044935,0.00078274886,0.00907737,0.01289322,0.02180508,0.009093313,0.0060629477,0.0039713136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10696106,0.0011373813,0.0012268868,0.009951962,0.0077805547,0.0069218916,0.006300966,0.0057318006,0.0011440935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014495947,0.0012911143,0.036993824,0.007752221,0.00009743858,0.0036910628,0.20610565,0.0033386925,0.002339526,0.02381978,0.14593756,0.5684882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011182651,0.0003905648,0.042342033,0.03386994,0.00012879184,0.0011403607,0.47820204,0.0024737867,0.0016964787,0.010535141,0.42876604,0.00034296996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34212953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50141877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6578705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037286885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16639064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6802762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189473434","doi":"","title":"Courtroom Technology Competence as a Lawyer’s Ethical Duty: What Should Regulators Do About It?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Competence (human resources); Duty; Legal ethics; Political science; Law; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.052276843393594744,"score_gpt":0.4046213014997844,"score_spread":0.3523444581061897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189473434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006307619,0.014715467,0.007990183,0.9296955,0.0015204587,0.000057129026,0.000021048829,0.00008123754,0.039611317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5046785,0.03004079,0.012973469,0.431584,0.005157803,0.00042855626,0.000054834592,0.00017475926,0.014907401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92017746,0.039920587,0.0033983532,0.0048894766,0.025526397,0.0060877865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8675282,0.08898304,0.010297298,0.005116722,0.019719526,0.008355251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06324891,0.00067156064,0.0018460847,0.0020034467,0.011789259,0.034879234,0.0040350026,0.043285634,0.0036521985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13493139,0.0008518821,0.0010078273,0.0020601812,0.05699067,0.036675327,0.0080609275,0.029522711,0.0018344476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048196747,0.00023683348,0.0030360979,0.00072833203,0.00004410584,0.000418877,0.034627132,0.00052443985,0.0011302256,0.82623583,0.0695605,0.0634094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067365734,0.00020262452,0.003439206,0.005670508,0.00008011873,0.000534552,0.03744603,0.0011070174,0.001393653,0.49004856,0.4597648,0.00024548513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011441135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011000075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06324891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010671191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04044651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33449626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192989477","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1984635","title":"Regulating Law Firms in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02030773793246171,"score_gpt":0.3233077561499192,"score_spread":0.3030000182174575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192989477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51257133,0.0066725556,0.0021861657,0.14724045,0.0007939604,0.0005592702,0.0016624192,0.0002453734,0.32806844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83855885,0.0015751958,0.001264854,0.024030147,0.000115147755,0.0001064705,0.0002786091,0.000052161973,0.13401853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846891,0.0008760753,0.00030892863,0.0011510534,0.004150468,0.0088243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801657,0.0037917877,0.0010799816,0.0005751475,0.0076442896,0.006742997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043641636,0.0004650783,0.0007452108,0.0032340137,0.028879303,0.0140615245,0.0043579335,0.011135699,0.012498929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014711055,0.0010751657,0.0009512302,0.003802581,0.005510693,0.0020993473,0.0039454913,0.007808305,0.00074214884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024360303,0.00041076844,0.08908062,0.00033299509,0.00018715438,0.0026743629,0.011013352,0.005849596,0.0026895918,0.6694027,0.16273417,0.05538111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038673676,0.00024501365,0.20576257,0.0007927623,0.00037134235,0.00047295922,0.030940471,0.010184635,0.003354562,0.033407845,0.7136237,0.0004573421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21719429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21719429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44638225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90794367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195711783","doi":"10.18352/erlacs.10124","title":"New Challenges for Fieldworkers in Latin American and Caribbean Studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies | Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Harm; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.12730303320707215,"score_gpt":0.3962051698002827,"score_spread":0.26890213659321055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195711783","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049906693,0.044835884,0.0038408416,0.84128296,0.0049419287,0.0004156845,0.00010319287,0.000073944044,0.05459887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6376776,0.0371071,0.010311409,0.27180678,0.0041543846,0.003873828,0.00017771809,0.0003100026,0.0345812],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.83199215,0.14003582,0.0036591417,0.00565353,0.00628093,0.012378394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8228418,0.124885716,0.006363718,0.0081581175,0.015218022,0.022532621],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21532361,0.0010640301,0.0019323492,0.007233983,0.0565152,0.036550395,0.009596446,0.016140494,0.017401965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14979564,0.0019652178,0.0011083981,0.007515826,0.071443744,0.02592012,0.041148584,0.014245436,0.0022354077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088755216,0.00013057822,0.0043281117,0.0010262519,0.000028519993,0.0010011045,0.8232632,0.00006366017,0.00026635363,0.09097249,0.033678435,0.04515249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035426823,0.000027813356,0.0012693091,0.0021954596,0.000009063823,0.000157234,0.8322182,0.000043155967,0.00004516095,0.03060375,0.13335817,0.00003729328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11069472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14637795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21532361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024891231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0774293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9676457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197219838","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2619","title":"Book Notes: The Paradox of Professionalism: Lawyers and the Possibility of Justice, by Scott L. Cummings (eds)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02925973481246088,"score_gpt":0.352465225754909,"score_spread":0.32320549094244816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197219838","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078145036,0.19368343,0.0019258921,0.7172047,0.009150054,0.000011707818,0.00013311986,0.00005824785,0.077051535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05277698,0.36799806,0.0062887818,0.19355091,0.047867905,0.00010937747,0.00027105282,0.00024276659,0.33089414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910825,0.0003320076,0.000036436075,0.00011547634,0.00035399775,0.00005379221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936706,0.005061148,0.00017343741,0.0001429531,0.0007276198,0.0002242132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019456306,0.0006736754,0.0005183198,0.0015229355,0.0039367625,0.0082883565,0.0015236674,0.006198806,0.017057385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050909035,0.0005055153,0.00040719894,0.0028868457,0.009832683,0.013105585,0.0014901949,0.007593912,0.0042800657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007386976,0.000011898173,0.000085519925,0.000079884936,0.000002491651,0.000037069505,0.00075156474,0.00011415304,0.000032509637,0.1436755,0.84122884,0.013973112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010770603,0.00000869093,0.00051785173,0.00047889573,0.0000053844774,0.00014131717,0.0022620452,0.00023249676,0.0001255783,0.19761594,0.7985785,0.000022534778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030956773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08962539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030956773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003755995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047740596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06155318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219836483","doi":"","title":"Teaching Legal Ethics a Quarter of a Century After Watergate","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.030421778966431567,"score_gpt":0.35889865140448973,"score_spread":0.3284768724380582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219836483","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009028828,0.047866885,0.0027827183,0.77125436,0.03159261,0.000052486437,0.000101468824,0.00013276695,0.13718794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09049261,0.018051874,0.0011407417,0.06286239,0.0043779346,0.000046370627,0.000040544237,0.00028023575,0.8227073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972857,0.00080104923,0.00009198962,0.00040754373,0.00089790544,0.0005157408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472964,0.0021015569,0.0001745638,0.00030195597,0.00094042986,0.0017518229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037817927,0.00045903915,0.00043799548,0.0017587736,0.0061312076,0.008923778,0.0008232787,0.008438175,0.02476514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012295937,0.00048893044,0.00038813511,0.0017159652,0.012758016,0.0093811015,0.0046414603,0.010075291,0.0034113068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079485806,0.00011282429,0.00058642065,0.0002474853,0.000011705934,0.00043821594,0.0071282974,0.00025076966,0.00064659945,0.32274255,0.5501681,0.11758762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009142372,0.000014749546,0.00037644393,0.00019460519,0.0000024928202,0.00004779746,0.0013701061,0.00006075535,0.0002887368,0.024087548,0.9735353,0.000012272782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06763855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16237797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06763855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017202068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019754864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13448972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198500276","doi":"","title":"Doctoral Studies in Law: From the Inside Out","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Doctoral dissertation; Sociology; Ethnography; Doctoral studies; Space (punctuation); Law; Political science; Pedagogy; Higher education","score_opus":0.1846878715239056,"score_gpt":0.42051282082914504,"score_spread":0.23582494930523945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198500276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63202333,0.016917039,0.0065349243,0.16479132,0.0010006113,0.00026936905,0.00015337094,0.00013355199,0.17817657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977,0.0036427549,0.00096567825,0.004992383,0.00014383718,0.00007683873,0.00003646029,0.0000445719,0.013097582],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96618825,0.019812966,0.00056771084,0.0015381436,0.005353474,0.006539448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96474886,0.014255982,0.0015439247,0.0012583139,0.0051948386,0.012998007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020112995,0.00031827224,0.0007295788,0.0030326797,0.053605884,0.01755353,0.0022772255,0.0043804753,0.0050593214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04648483,0.0005189281,0.0003723836,0.0037143626,0.05995408,0.008786888,0.017692888,0.008212489,0.00066207844],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000142502995,0.000022983788,0.0018789564,0.000047984948,0.000002261297,0.00020888366,0.95642316,0.000031761698,0.00027865087,0.024170537,0.0043710154,0.012549597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045776073,0.000018885523,0.0029380484,0.0001655926,0.000002446945,0.00012002131,0.87484163,0.000033547087,0.00009585209,0.0034979542,0.11826179,0.000019699697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4392899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.641125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4392899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058581904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12659812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8734659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2199563901","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139128834.017","title":"Ontario’s ‘<i>shariʽa</i> court’: law and politics intertwined","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.039518934275217195,"score_gpt":0.26083804570055574,"score_spread":0.22131911142533855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2199563901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03200774,0.007837696,0.0016184493,0.07297953,0.0006824194,0.00004947422,0.0003776332,0.000046829413,0.8844001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4412678,0.0050486657,0.0014575025,0.00605366,0.00017205716,0.000034797606,0.00014143453,0.00006548951,0.54575855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984432,0.00017915023,0.000029046538,0.00011229501,0.00070841576,0.00052795594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899036,0.00021768239,0.00006766948,0.00005766744,0.0003902836,0.00027642728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088127196,0.00021867386,0.00016941673,0.000783985,0.0139508555,0.0056574936,0.0008598112,0.0021354773,0.013118684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018562063,0.00033430886,0.00025895966,0.0019456752,0.009462037,0.00193112,0.0014145378,0.0017314663,0.00067493337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023307319,0.000010983894,0.003248115,0.0001241366,0.000009175882,0.00049868907,0.029606879,0.00028351689,0.00044794372,0.70199025,0.2332579,0.030499132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005625582,0.0000063473276,0.0077084047,0.00012022028,0.000007047903,0.000116538155,0.007976644,0.00019083796,0.00012998986,0.016188148,0.9675259,0.000024354731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98411405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090317145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.090317145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10089419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6552998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2199580116","doi":"","title":"Resisting the Hidden Curriculum: Teaching for Social Justice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Curriculum; Scholarship; Criminal justice; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Socialization; Political science; Criminal law; Pedagogy; Law; Identity (music); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.04700363773337909,"score_gpt":0.3885684980306408,"score_spread":0.34156486029726174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2199580116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635815,0.00020211529,0.0058907433,0.0040681204,0.00010627037,0.0005702813,0.000028521981,0.000098438424,0.025453994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97887987,0.00021692824,0.010632151,0.00083426054,0.000020737936,0.0004902378,0.000028383918,0.000028055269,0.008869245],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215734,0.0042319903,0.00016198475,0.000803873,0.001305853,0.0013389448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918658,0.0037684187,0.0007101132,0.00071114674,0.00033572913,0.0026088378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050683976,0.00045012566,0.00040681034,0.0005201237,0.008551702,0.0053733815,0.0025387844,0.0022500386,0.0053027803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010075879,0.0002722966,0.0003552044,0.0005587198,0.011015841,0.0023776079,0.0069783423,0.0029957257,0.0006160687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005597766,0.012355298,0.019796181,0.0010151109,0.000049170878,0.0011876243,0.6058647,0.0022365008,0.020284839,0.06463,0.0114831105,0.2605376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011548663,0.013533805,0.045336347,0.0008355769,0.0001503994,0.0012214541,0.47390407,0.0049220445,0.025551682,0.037956715,0.3951313,0.00030177747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03709372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12840854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03709372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01235879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015091824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089669704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200182845","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1188","title":"Not So Dangerous Liaisons: A Clinical Perspective on Interdisciplinarity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Space (punctuation); Quality (philosophy); Legal education; Engineering ethics; Narrative; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Public relations; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.10539369464726837,"score_gpt":0.5174340682983596,"score_spread":0.4120403736510912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200182845","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015863482,0.010404618,0.014591064,0.82462686,0.0023393407,0.0001357671,0.000014802108,0.00006761558,0.13195647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80161166,0.011813632,0.009685917,0.15287015,0.0039370684,0.00037643744,0.000034240926,0.00012487765,0.01954604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95107144,0.040353224,0.000979734,0.0022662773,0.002397984,0.00293136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95008206,0.028948903,0.003215473,0.0019364128,0.0049629495,0.010854125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03510632,0.0008076987,0.0008832285,0.0028545707,0.020061146,0.023949737,0.004920694,0.022212971,0.009672947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05578144,0.00064497825,0.00067371264,0.0012988033,0.10258596,0.02115121,0.018576184,0.033232283,0.0016739921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032996995,0.00032252655,0.0013743957,0.00028916745,0.000014731957,0.0033434404,0.21166591,0.00038910878,0.00025148343,0.72217184,0.034993455,0.025150923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000724366,0.000206532,0.00051326136,0.001333162,0.00001443929,0.0049292548,0.22532281,0.00053162617,0.0002923212,0.5488208,0.21789907,0.00006425231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003405827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004873274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03510632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009256734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03273717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18566215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201480063","doi":"","title":"Community-Based Access to Justice – Building a Responsive Justice System in New Brunswick","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Monopoly; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07341239473143475,"score_gpt":0.42234782855517156,"score_spread":0.3489354338237368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201480063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7627237,0.0053868718,0.0059371777,0.04212746,0.0005312298,0.0012330554,0.00057681033,0.000096362506,0.1813873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94625443,0.0015254354,0.0045988946,0.0041645514,0.000027609565,0.00033557336,0.0003197041,0.00004407244,0.04272963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972499,0.00036768432,0.00010549604,0.0002541028,0.00036215378,0.0016607852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651057,0.0007321394,0.0002656474,0.00022080334,0.00084453495,0.001426384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002376521,0.00027737304,0.00041972572,0.0013976417,0.010458126,0.006094335,0.0023419422,0.0014801634,0.008192306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004458635,0.0004980379,0.00033723094,0.0022823415,0.0046783066,0.002675061,0.0072490177,0.002813544,0.00033589377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004651052,0.00046697163,0.1330514,0.0011584624,0.00016098664,0.023558658,0.13462868,0.005162294,0.012893148,0.43923718,0.03205554,0.21716163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022080055,0.00022720917,0.1879568,0.0015813906,0.00009451428,0.002338052,0.19239625,0.0032526772,0.0037365495,0.036094733,0.57165426,0.00044679202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9515541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063058436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063058436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13949303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4575231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201745179","doi":"","title":"WHAT IF WE DIDN’T WAIT? CANADIAN LAW SOCIETIES AND THE PROMOTION OF EFFECTIVE ETHICAL INFRASTRUCTURE IN LAW PRACTICES","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Promotion (chess); Political science","score_opus":0.011541557436710329,"score_gpt":0.3333822246115954,"score_spread":0.3218406671748851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201745179","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022748034,0.0050282613,0.0006172349,0.88036,0.0017473375,0.000050982228,0.00008684437,0.00003998986,0.08932131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80419236,0.0054176077,0.0026323183,0.14444682,0.00060509786,0.00008949809,0.00008169109,0.000092662376,0.04244194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745386,0.005534664,0.00047296128,0.0015626943,0.0079732565,0.009917793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9232797,0.012991169,0.0045518302,0.0017511403,0.027902506,0.029523665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020161623,0.00043803387,0.0006618289,0.0033970673,0.039684534,0.019574765,0.0030049887,0.012664896,0.016773941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07904716,0.0005913614,0.0005950794,0.0045073847,0.037960853,0.013722197,0.008949637,0.017489268,0.0008763804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059945036,0.00011435851,0.01009788,0.00029036275,0.00004072409,0.00035278485,0.04784555,0.0003195593,0.0002661335,0.6485896,0.22503553,0.06698754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009639777,0.00006440777,0.030886602,0.0013797387,0.00008389229,0.00017161717,0.08576074,0.0004064329,0.0004318679,0.09464391,0.7858063,0.0002681135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98202604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9913292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1792982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1792982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4533482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95189774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201892303","doi":"","title":"Derrick Bell: Ethical Ambition and Law Teaching","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03768112833724368,"score_gpt":0.40022285156439225,"score_spread":0.36254172322714856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201892303","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033258754,0.056302305,0.0010371626,0.7931916,0.0070846532,0.000022217564,0.000018040992,0.00007831875,0.13893983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20545062,0.0479671,0.002573896,0.36355096,0.0050318367,0.00016259597,0.000045988545,0.0002865003,0.3749305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98807305,0.006589408,0.00026228945,0.00077201513,0.003198297,0.0011048877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913434,0.0040893145,0.0005272968,0.000241408,0.0010533985,0.0027451047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056418846,0.00041272354,0.00034471598,0.0010003219,0.01937183,0.012877778,0.001194007,0.008186373,0.015153988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012723217,0.0005388175,0.00021349145,0.0010428643,0.018075254,0.00820915,0.0069954367,0.014736497,0.003539736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013004204,0.000079573554,0.00043790694,0.00011671172,0.0000033822932,0.00026078973,0.035621125,0.00004882983,0.00016419905,0.20237397,0.7165587,0.04432188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004504876,0.000016301294,0.00057297794,0.00044599868,0.0000016951155,0.00024300336,0.023010423,0.000077043835,0.00009084617,0.0347377,0.9407832,0.00001639454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025663404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046912443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025663404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009801525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012229501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071115375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203974900","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1187","title":"Poverty Law, Access to Justice, and Ethical Lawyering: Celebrating 40 Years of Clinical Education at Osgoode Hall Law School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Legal education; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10444906302504327,"score_gpt":0.5056466276795187,"score_spread":0.4011975646544755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203974900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21906132,0.010057758,0.0002590429,0.7041682,0.0035260406,0.000067490684,0.00009840405,0.000070585025,0.06269117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7746681,0.012865464,0.0014285217,0.09857794,0.0028502478,0.00026946617,0.00017167021,0.0001354952,0.10903317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937843,0.0023704432,0.00012235895,0.00032733462,0.0011585382,0.0022369733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813432,0.0019537315,0.0010102632,0.00022314473,0.0010684788,0.014401235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009019755,0.00037947536,0.00051479565,0.0011920382,0.017500872,0.009539186,0.0012650291,0.0054778196,0.011130344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01328751,0.00048136266,0.00030390377,0.00068849354,0.00858413,0.0057633715,0.013497667,0.013388232,0.0013235972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007548682,0.0021288523,0.016313588,0.00021349976,0.000026448806,0.0007399731,0.19403341,0.000110419554,0.0006803695,0.014265187,0.61646354,0.15494932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028324934,0.00032803506,0.051523555,0.0007182363,0.000015916754,0.0003810817,0.37632087,0.00009137527,0.00045712345,0.008506457,0.56155694,0.000072166134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016860526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16161716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017500872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008952936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025391664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064958334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205727972","doi":"","title":"The 'Approved' Common Law Degree","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03333612355647054,"score_gpt":0.3636706820454093,"score_spread":0.3303345584889388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205727972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07985118,0.0008546195,0.006970666,0.022120276,0.0045304066,0.0004042347,0.0009620266,0.00044357183,0.88386303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48190156,0.00038864373,0.0027818803,0.007056885,0.0012076852,0.0002536686,0.0005422991,0.00020646167,0.50566095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97728527,0.0035921258,0.00093523005,0.002628701,0.010559431,0.0049991966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95622784,0.0073785116,0.0028559598,0.006539206,0.01583624,0.01116232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010380576,0.0003389793,0.0006486143,0.002752382,0.008314563,0.00897563,0.0022703023,0.0032729604,0.07065262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047824193,0.00047654155,0.0006346835,0.0017141144,0.006179221,0.00454696,0.007265353,0.003973751,0.016836995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096499694,0.00027330124,0.0172953,0.0002032632,0.000021059197,0.0005724688,0.008228828,0.00039882446,0.00176871,0.7098993,0.15089124,0.110351235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039173312,0.00021111719,0.023635328,0.00018200932,0.0000148922245,0.00047944972,0.0027730158,0.00033594877,0.0010303587,0.026695287,0.94454396,0.000059550843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01772136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04845429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07065262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007174375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02625863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23635656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206508939","doi":"","title":"A first for this top legal mind: practising law; Former Supreme Court justice shares advice as she begins the next phase of her high-profile career back in Montreal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; High Court; Advice (programming); Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.07041091807254532,"score_gpt":0.38197183116026057,"score_spread":0.3115609130877153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206508939","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04084887,0.0013257248,0.0038982965,0.68582064,0.009721045,0.00021370569,0.00022206984,0.00079653173,0.2571531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21428864,0.0012231797,0.008619332,0.12244269,0.0008735805,0.000089679364,0.00012862255,0.0005068259,0.6518275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950197,0.0009036918,0.00006388477,0.0003343762,0.0013641539,0.0023141562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97256225,0.00093700056,0.00046350618,0.00018649547,0.0027618383,0.0230889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030062946,0.00046608504,0.00045761943,0.0010134807,0.047313817,0.01082223,0.002680236,0.0064800587,0.07186519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013752167,0.00080061174,0.000470266,0.0006278573,0.008582113,0.0044860286,0.0071676425,0.017041674,0.012616672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023670254,0.00040488332,0.0059655034,0.000040177423,0.000011158241,0.0024990856,0.04187951,0.00007822796,0.0013846712,0.015575552,0.8955616,0.036575966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020771773,0.000096936725,0.009988144,0.00017402828,0.000010915048,0.0015828275,0.13073096,0.0002559668,0.00085363863,0.00444592,0.8517257,0.00011421089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4840533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8713843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5159467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020163367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071495086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9624716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206897579","doi":"10.18438/b8h30f","title":"A Training Needs Analysis Case Study at Legal Aid Queensland","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Training (meteorology); Plan (archaeology); Work (physics); Needs analysis; Computer science; Descriptive statistics; Knowledge management; Needs assessment; Medical education; Engineering management; Engineering; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.08408454456420247,"score_gpt":0.3779851728669892,"score_spread":0.29390062830278674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206897579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9624645,0.0002951205,0.0023919267,0.009136825,0.000045699115,0.00079600787,0.00013581249,0.000040455678,0.024693685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97515,0.00047362596,0.004251883,0.0013332436,0.00003828638,0.00046809376,0.00009963517,0.000032686858,0.018152608],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99109554,0.004627286,0.00042769226,0.00048457945,0.0013348231,0.0020300702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98585445,0.007705297,0.00086765894,0.0003650062,0.0026119326,0.0025955813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008946664,0.00035836265,0.0004292087,0.0033112895,0.0149112735,0.0029847145,0.0024307997,0.0024599594,0.013754231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013994544,0.00087532215,0.00040457,0.0042957375,0.0037918105,0.0028456158,0.005524112,0.0033543282,0.0010389903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013169833,0.0019073287,0.026677497,0.00067931536,0.000021463475,0.039335,0.851136,0.0010425084,0.001701918,0.01015338,0.0098111555,0.05740265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028188975,0.00033045997,0.020271275,0.00034150277,0.000012691622,0.003025436,0.93561697,0.0012245323,0.0005762412,0.0013592537,0.037184104,0.000029329654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08422517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15064743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08422517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021627912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01510241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16746986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207776214","doi":"","title":"The Community Legal Clinic Quality Assurance Program: An Innovative Experience in Quality Assurance in Legal Aid","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Quality (philosophy); QA/QC; Business; Engineering management; Engineering; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.18983497243007907,"score_gpt":0.5344663109563755,"score_spread":0.34463133852629646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207776214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76526326,0.0066537573,0.029440194,0.085044384,0.0013080016,0.0031445806,0.00033543792,0.0008824432,0.10792797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85738176,0.0044999006,0.077343486,0.012283193,0.000511149,0.0007390785,0.00026551337,0.0003086287,0.046667285],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865068,0.0080582695,0.00021858695,0.0007262707,0.0023279304,0.0021620905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97194797,0.0038775103,0.00077395124,0.0010172053,0.0032735036,0.019109786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013214767,0.0004386076,0.00023963912,0.001013406,0.011701036,0.0044814954,0.0031520803,0.0019621302,0.0049165115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0118379835,0.0005276994,0.00045875896,0.0016278721,0.007565768,0.0019805913,0.007517989,0.0043920157,0.00060206826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041507964,0.008480692,0.03613416,0.00092683453,0.00006825624,0.007194776,0.26172912,0.0017651645,0.006371241,0.011607207,0.102374084,0.56293344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000515156,0.004816489,0.057125427,0.0005679263,0.00006379174,0.005567582,0.14727232,0.002737653,0.0027238464,0.004688416,0.7736984,0.0002229793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10959822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37241018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10959822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01228828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057124205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2179206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209310675","doi":"","title":"Separating Powers at the University: Applying Constitutional Law to Internal Academic Governance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of powers; Bureaucracy; Institution; Political science; Scholarship; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Law; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Administrative law; Public administration; Administration (probate law); Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Management","score_opus":0.03611892015735141,"score_gpt":0.331099732155242,"score_spread":0.2949808119978906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209310675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07391625,0.006409039,0.26064867,0.12421246,0.0010557844,0.00020562221,0.00011509873,0.00022118744,0.5332159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737274,0.0010474366,0.011761555,0.005131038,0.00077979383,0.00017256477,0.000027336566,0.00006429343,0.0072884965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98036766,0.011832737,0.0007446154,0.002127554,0.0024750547,0.002452428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773737,0.015334203,0.0014931278,0.0026858149,0.0019159572,0.0011972159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026942834,0.00046963457,0.00084296556,0.0026085046,0.011187048,0.02160001,0.002245377,0.008279057,0.0034325207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042100195,0.00068879745,0.0010218633,0.0023557968,0.077218674,0.020477094,0.009545617,0.009642017,0.000594037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015876188,0.0000028580055,0.00009243655,0.0000044912167,0.000001194974,0.000012168269,0.0006753423,0.00017903032,0.000011993975,0.99770445,0.00027877055,0.0010357455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070878555,0.0000049207697,0.000087365675,0.000039825998,0.000002988101,0.000009242367,0.00041640102,0.00047178907,0.000048953654,0.9931329,0.0057717166,0.0000068509685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009461488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00578364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026942834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01286256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014861499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14248902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209528132","doi":"","title":"Doubting what the Elders have to say","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Law; Mandate; Objectivity (philosophy); Supreme court; Sovereignty; Oral history; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Rules of evidence; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.17541120754902445,"score_gpt":0.4751415685260832,"score_spread":0.29973036097705874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209528132","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03563401,0.014696274,0.0029790634,0.8595072,0.007613333,0.000026221483,0.00017469081,0.00003558912,0.07933374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51056486,0.015644744,0.002927903,0.43293384,0.0048808297,0.0000354104,0.00014360565,0.0000640073,0.03280485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99248976,0.0032995848,0.000607092,0.0006533577,0.0019467236,0.0010034617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97177774,0.014262759,0.0023962448,0.0017119522,0.0070873774,0.0027638876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020494632,0.0003609916,0.0010687419,0.000983225,0.010205451,0.0074194833,0.001356487,0.008820334,0.0073122415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06077567,0.0004159297,0.00057381263,0.00065889896,0.030755008,0.014303794,0.0053497376,0.011002997,0.002151416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016993035,0.000100084086,0.013191472,0.00091117306,0.00012928506,0.004280705,0.19173187,0.00017936056,0.001520473,0.4032826,0.27510494,0.10939812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033668235,0.000064171734,0.003920662,0.0023454416,0.00010405219,0.0018924454,0.1641777,0.00013448618,0.0009128104,0.21270148,0.6135844,0.0001287132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034772854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051900756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034772854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003905339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015023925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10838723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209717632","doi":"10.5791/0882-2875-25.1.29","title":"The Do's and Don'ts for the Business Appraiser Giving Expert Witness Testimony","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Valuation Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expert witness; Witness; Cross-examination; Valuation (finance); Checklist; Law; Business valuation; Actuarial science; Business; Political science; Psychology; Accounting","score_opus":0.09732306573428133,"score_gpt":0.4209115077590345,"score_spread":0.3235884420247532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209717632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043728232,0.010126936,0.094324,0.6208191,0.029860249,0.009212698,0.0022398175,0.0022666089,0.1874224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3284422,0.008350227,0.30127758,0.2479208,0.008277932,0.008449967,0.001091732,0.0007742048,0.09541529],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.89815533,0.043080747,0.026277045,0.002286458,0.027078772,0.003121634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65966535,0.20870262,0.02333077,0.020897109,0.07929746,0.008106639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09960707,0.00075381534,0.0013279401,0.0043647336,0.0054950016,0.008502241,0.0030104092,0.012391391,0.004961238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25375602,0.0014204829,0.0012460818,0.0011678298,0.008128183,0.005461401,0.004485505,0.010216564,0.005003583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044914038,0.00032668086,0.008692772,0.0015806486,0.00004338126,0.0018359431,0.0034956713,0.0005575056,0.0049333153,0.08463594,0.7502749,0.14317419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025653763,0.0006694945,0.014434992,0.0046434207,0.0001095749,0.0034789143,0.0054766093,0.0027345126,0.006972003,0.05705219,0.9037109,0.0004608874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003891472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008831589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09960707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035402556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013441287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5267788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209941638","doi":"","title":"The Ethical Identity of Sexual Assault Lawyers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Criminology; Criminal law; Scholarship; Political science; Criminal justice; Law; Sexual violence; Sexual assault; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.066693772560637,"score_gpt":0.39338224698878665,"score_spread":0.32668847442814963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209941638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90978146,0.0012111691,0.0017738665,0.032713834,0.00013618442,0.00004671849,0.000010579984,0.00001870907,0.054307472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932667,0.00035899822,0.00031548488,0.0013051941,0.000014602723,0.000009904604,0.0000042085126,0.00000592776,0.0047189696],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98750466,0.0074165217,0.00026007928,0.0005419023,0.0023737669,0.0019031117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99209166,0.0029908183,0.00140275,0.00030449653,0.0011213387,0.0020889903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006016885,0.0001524501,0.00027460806,0.0011357891,0.018234193,0.009913922,0.00093405525,0.0018162342,0.0022663008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01486392,0.00029361152,0.00013683748,0.00089424243,0.035322316,0.0026846728,0.0059578116,0.004900332,0.0001995304],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071528284,0.00003631214,0.004738808,0.000018140121,0.0000023299963,0.00037098865,0.9560893,0.000028368577,0.0006089133,0.029114906,0.0012283255,0.0077563883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044902904,0.000022061762,0.004384252,0.000073909665,0.0000025043291,0.0003241379,0.9518562,0.00007331373,0.00020058338,0.0057855295,0.03725968,0.000013278371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056836966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079092555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056836966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01291773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02404897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113012254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212337182","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1008","title":"Book Review: The First Women Lawyers: A Comparative Study of Gender, Law and the Legal Professions, by Mary Jane Mossman; The Ursula Franklin Reader: Pacifism as a Map, by Ursula M. Franklin","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.039906791484003924,"score_gpt":0.39661287441849274,"score_spread":0.3567060829344888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212337182","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038939115,0.8038171,0.0002015028,0.11129584,0.04898165,0.00004385725,0.00039675133,0.000045385175,0.034828488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050847363,0.7132898,0.00037436307,0.03784953,0.037921242,0.00013587528,0.0007470084,0.00009280791,0.20450465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896777,0.00023760313,0.000064232154,0.00009102211,0.00055911345,0.00008034872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927856,0.003857804,0.00036281,0.00009072621,0.0024757818,0.000427264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009799028,0.0008585754,0.0013536563,0.004149381,0.0018163578,0.00437552,0.0016158889,0.0032892316,0.043641582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080691865,0.0005784564,0.00043498425,0.0085812695,0.0013518822,0.004005314,0.0011879117,0.0033412296,0.015856303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031809961,0.000004264343,0.000035518657,0.00024147828,0.0000020119098,0.000010626027,0.00006651739,0.000011795323,0.000015708996,0.0004975972,0.98797417,0.011137149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005235674,0.000012207323,0.0007619474,0.0014784259,0.0000070031133,0.00009642952,0.00036580366,0.000015669837,0.000030945954,0.00059368776,0.99662423,0.000008565236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02778884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11223567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043641582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041899006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070102424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14599568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215756687","doi":"","title":"Reopening Law's Gate: Public Interest Standing and Access to Justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Economic Justice; Political science; Legislature; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.21014143115358025,"score_gpt":0.42090159303027436,"score_spread":0.2107601618766941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215756687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18964651,0.0046801246,0.003964944,0.17638549,0.0004228364,0.000021642583,0.00011314193,0.00007371785,0.6246916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98764324,0.0005179113,0.0001741812,0.003302398,0.00005516908,0.0000058490887,0.000010747394,0.000017428927,0.008272976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560213,0.0012852512,0.00006099857,0.00028543483,0.00085397856,0.0019122467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706036,0.0014913658,0.00021611246,0.00018971413,0.00047193893,0.0005704988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031060716,0.00023350045,0.0003088076,0.0011706293,0.018045766,0.021875598,0.0017231462,0.0064428803,0.0059962757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007434989,0.00024938965,0.00031127455,0.0011344277,0.0522312,0.0141487885,0.005978105,0.006490323,0.00060223124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016439777,0.000012341072,0.00053702586,0.000016455931,0.0000023025077,0.00031360248,0.085206635,0.000043807973,0.00012928888,0.90320027,0.0058216047,0.0047001746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022815622,0.0000312377,0.005033605,0.0002603434,0.000020223239,0.0006216001,0.2822112,0.0005666338,0.00037821694,0.4544705,0.25628462,0.00009902908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.436264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3923139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.436264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033592254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018200587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86744934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221584915","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1212","title":"Community Campaigns for the Right to Housing: Lessons from the R2H Coalition of Ontario","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Variety (cybernetics); Community organizing; Public administration; Political science; Work (physics); Public relations; Community organization; Affordable housing; Public housing; Sociology; Economic growth; Law; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.22800561846139725,"score_gpt":0.46652266542694615,"score_spread":0.2385170469655489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221584915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34034497,0.004690933,0.0015666062,0.28800422,0.00072566886,0.0002599343,0.00022775725,0.000061102866,0.36411878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94649243,0.0021499784,0.0006750497,0.008759961,0.0001237365,0.00008584115,0.000074967866,0.00003781994,0.04160023],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930166,0.0016240845,0.00009474326,0.00033177374,0.0014813931,0.0034514333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903356,0.0029520846,0.0005262354,0.00029235435,0.0016146088,0.0042791753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064230855,0.00033737504,0.00034872792,0.001166143,0.037857376,0.008447931,0.0017795532,0.0032492047,0.006241844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008625361,0.00036853904,0.0003445308,0.001933708,0.015629506,0.003652124,0.0080019375,0.0033682482,0.0002977347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001239627,0.00017554215,0.02395505,0.0002647317,0.000036171492,0.0022306638,0.5255925,0.00046350824,0.0006166868,0.2641175,0.100252725,0.08217094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006462324,0.000049875947,0.03797175,0.00031805245,0.000024214447,0.00016969495,0.29357958,0.0003099922,0.00036901096,0.013579235,0.6534954,0.000068674206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97849065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99310416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12324584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12324584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17286727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89421535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215991120","doi":"","title":"Front Matter for In Search of the Ethical Lawyer: Stories from the Canadian Legal Profession","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Legal profession; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.033438627182023936,"score_gpt":0.39666951528482264,"score_spread":0.3632308881027987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215991120","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056845166,0.044535358,0.00093461503,0.58170575,0.0062964833,0.00013313495,0.00036048208,0.00011627196,0.3090728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49112308,0.04920561,0.0019328342,0.11869183,0.0015466469,0.00019510843,0.0003013745,0.00045198636,0.33655167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99025667,0.0023721356,0.00010223845,0.00034747337,0.004533774,0.0023876838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893332,0.0036225368,0.00039354205,0.00018623484,0.0030672494,0.0033971826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052743345,0.0008847618,0.00067710807,0.0027032928,0.0711534,0.013824672,0.0025627764,0.0067202286,0.011337647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01756982,0.00068515894,0.00042307354,0.00524509,0.025189372,0.00897989,0.006175105,0.010999945,0.0018896456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020273194,0.000038733247,0.000992346,0.00017933539,0.0000064259784,0.00130743,0.37297076,0.00005338347,0.00019341616,0.03613383,0.565177,0.022927118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026469636,0.0000077232025,0.001239811,0.00025783764,0.0000045196994,0.00025573128,0.3114083,0.000040328807,0.00007160661,0.0018803538,0.6847965,0.00003465894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9378265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9832976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0954992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0954992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081750765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69289845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216466673","doi":"","title":"Doing the Business: Judges, Academics, and Intellectuals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Nexus (standard); Context (archaeology); Law; Order (exchange); Independence (probability theory); Political science; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.0209703467139324,"score_gpt":0.3333821277257114,"score_spread":0.312411781011779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216466673","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029216886,0.02485771,0.0022424362,0.7464552,0.015428873,0.00009343181,0.00004970542,0.00019200127,0.18146384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7420411,0.009386335,0.0019096768,0.1648015,0.017166583,0.00022987937,0.000090509464,0.00029392025,0.0640804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9111767,0.043739237,0.0021602316,0.0060566794,0.02214271,0.01472452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8625116,0.051416535,0.0073390626,0.0051790997,0.026227271,0.047326542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060730875,0.00081410905,0.0011559167,0.0058405446,0.042152196,0.0643618,0.005364459,0.020990457,0.008031451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13448784,0.00077408535,0.000575289,0.006384451,0.08203148,0.023885105,0.0156819,0.027365206,0.0024741266],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030368847,0.00017743674,0.0024576995,0.00013948449,0.00001701192,0.00050270313,0.12926818,0.00011786674,0.00020163208,0.5973043,0.24279572,0.026987558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063882355,0.00007295858,0.0016369729,0.00072098104,0.000017631832,0.00022081353,0.15735875,0.00031788187,0.00027991846,0.2352558,0.60397017,0.00008428234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009115166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012801114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0643618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022187207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04255785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3211794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217285498","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.902793","title":"Does the Public Understand Intellectual Property Law? Do Lawyers?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law; Property law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Property rights; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.028278343672201202,"score_gpt":0.31054464066210385,"score_spread":0.28226629698990263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217285498","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12450112,0.0020062178,0.0018817954,0.7740316,0.00034427736,0.000027421562,0.00006417362,0.000037266796,0.09710613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93332404,0.001855714,0.0003497267,0.05543492,0.0004762787,0.00002260303,0.00004182861,0.000025562662,0.008469435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98900115,0.005005858,0.00026419878,0.000667175,0.0020206922,0.0030409705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.920336,0.053630214,0.0117401425,0.0028219458,0.0056088725,0.0058628004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015018676,0.00019805046,0.00048581086,0.0017437241,0.0053219576,0.012278479,0.0011378955,0.01137567,0.021235552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08901745,0.00047798303,0.00040676692,0.001195093,0.014776401,0.02259822,0.0037651744,0.011275309,0.0026003122],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001866122,0.0018901273,0.114966094,0.00036602115,0.00010148107,0.0015432478,0.17164087,0.00046216795,0.0010191115,0.4357627,0.14252234,0.12953925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016980368,0.00016291185,0.04969,0.00084147556,0.000097322205,0.0010035175,0.20624551,0.0013232885,0.00093769364,0.44896168,0.2904688,0.00009801912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016836459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015024272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021235552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067223078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013161505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0794273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218153985","doi":"","title":"Special Section to Celebrate Twenty Years Of Publishing: Access to Justice And Law Reform # 2","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Yearbook; Privilege (computing); Public administration; Sociology; Library science","score_opus":0.03667479061876271,"score_gpt":0.36328099944020587,"score_spread":0.32660620882144314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218153985","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007495901,0.028547931,0.00016784066,0.31083453,0.6030176,0.00006239383,0.00032480617,0.00025684971,0.056038417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0063214162,0.017983511,0.00018436043,0.061209142,0.56174886,0.00006376074,0.00033039303,0.00028380158,0.3518747],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647504,0.00040174808,0.00029770812,0.00041539152,0.0017404547,0.0006695856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98344743,0.003544623,0.0012112042,0.0009895223,0.004800592,0.0060066893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039421082,0.0012883922,0.0014117681,0.003566411,0.0053214603,0.012633683,0.0022520262,0.010108058,0.10997437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011422124,0.00064357615,0.0008222281,0.0027241977,0.0029988391,0.007091132,0.0035144398,0.005969619,0.030514294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010133684,0.0000124020235,0.00011133511,0.000082215745,0.0000025578017,0.00006659895,0.0000649778,0.0000069879243,0.000052467098,0.000802168,0.9931926,0.005595575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044325852,0.000016456224,0.0004825185,0.00013001017,0.0000038018402,0.00008207086,0.0001953475,0.000015234215,0.000044705193,0.00043371308,0.99858487,0.0000068840072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007586107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03266105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10997437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045384276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005932191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3679009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218916827","doi":"","title":"The View From Here: Access to Justice and Community Legal Clinics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Injustice; Political science; Politics; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Sociology; Vision; Law; Criminology","score_opus":0.07850862130710287,"score_gpt":0.446330215674708,"score_spread":0.3678215943676051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218916827","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077738695,0.0068355068,0.0021517596,0.68883806,0.0013675493,0.000026794854,0.000108803004,0.000033613247,0.22289927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88192004,0.0045438926,0.00060635316,0.08629416,0.0006006533,0.000042542255,0.000045451317,0.00004161209,0.02590532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546546,0.0019398945,0.000063880674,0.00031012006,0.00051547197,0.0017051824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941415,0.002011317,0.0003699708,0.0001580018,0.0005195944,0.0027996046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002515904,0.00020876183,0.00035559246,0.0011726605,0.017987289,0.016602151,0.0015604999,0.00625988,0.019818533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007383645,0.0002607877,0.0002662115,0.0013597382,0.02729015,0.013700053,0.010342072,0.01054187,0.0010009506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027051718,0.000076562406,0.0042848554,0.00009367016,0.0000060970447,0.0007431207,0.093428865,0.00012199555,0.0002153404,0.83143634,0.05131684,0.018249262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000498998,0.000069823305,0.0084983995,0.0013543891,0.000020742516,0.0009359649,0.29888597,0.0003467621,0.00023605922,0.19902395,0.49049178,0.00008631777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19546391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2529174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19546391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017185412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020498466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38865232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220239534","doi":"","title":"Jumping on The Bandwagon: How Canadian Lawyers Can & Should Get Involved in the Emerging Trend to Implement Therapeutic Jurisprudence Practices in Canadian Courts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"bepress Legal Series","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bandwagon effect; Jurisprudence; Law; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.09767643661509175,"score_gpt":0.39108395724819367,"score_spread":0.29340752063310194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220239534","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078262016,0.0030180162,0.0027562683,0.7819015,0.0011180566,0.0001529899,0.00009728247,0.00012185082,0.13257205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8456033,0.0025540204,0.0046536904,0.09556292,0.00019971923,0.00011976339,0.00006326713,0.00016823914,0.05107517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96199685,0.011543152,0.0006945277,0.0021189598,0.010342582,0.013303907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96260214,0.009749167,0.0018283402,0.0009964337,0.013005542,0.011818417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024973033,0.00055817026,0.0006381773,0.002524991,0.08442458,0.028034,0.005128469,0.019668216,0.017547462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068311326,0.00090357295,0.0007962662,0.0040407865,0.03863145,0.011963465,0.010172773,0.020692116,0.0015136868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010508906,0.00018553152,0.011345682,0.0002601103,0.000046431956,0.0014052073,0.28026336,0.00073534064,0.0010519801,0.34828976,0.24763583,0.10867564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086257576,0.00007492237,0.021999352,0.00076953456,0.000092954644,0.00026651833,0.30284768,0.0013644735,0.0005909757,0.044121757,0.6273638,0.00042172402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99601644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19113038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19113038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43014637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9381741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220378460","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1656475","title":"Lawyers, Guns and Money: Lawyers and Power in Canadian Society","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.008150784164689498,"score_gpt":0.30577122849395727,"score_spread":0.29762044432926776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220378460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47631878,0.015009063,0.00082230783,0.22555701,0.00052929344,0.00008782323,0.0006780928,0.000043339624,0.2809542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542178,0.0051572295,0.00028683164,0.004231608,0.000091829505,0.000021086571,0.00009063519,0.000019535508,0.035883475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954873,0.0006039146,0.00009581122,0.00031933392,0.0012142468,0.0022794306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99103117,0.0026535597,0.00069965946,0.00012832148,0.0022439302,0.0032433956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024714672,0.00043684675,0.0005965889,0.004775077,0.031866282,0.013247701,0.002678232,0.0049909432,0.032231145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017422311,0.0005497479,0.00037321862,0.009866817,0.02018339,0.0060026455,0.005138775,0.0055163484,0.00070808927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011149143,0.0002203992,0.048826724,0.00032927303,0.000031409865,0.0007728602,0.2503432,0.0006623523,0.0002503507,0.5255029,0.09226649,0.08068256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005733986,0.000042732838,0.10537621,0.00067844253,0.000085046995,0.00028387387,0.51041615,0.00083070266,0.00022155959,0.068874635,0.31294802,0.00018534678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20609117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20609117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3276681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9208217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220480832","doi":"","title":"The Long, Sometimes Winding, Road of Professional Discipline: Correspondent's Report from Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Public administration; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.014186483835323704,"score_gpt":0.35222339678858194,"score_spread":0.3380369129532582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220480832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41986966,0.021544948,0.0012188636,0.31344756,0.0055078347,0.00046609994,0.0064938026,0.00039325593,0.231058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77630675,0.011536463,0.0011794117,0.048407916,0.00045460093,0.000096371354,0.0015072379,0.00020826916,0.16030306],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99051917,0.000509226,0.00022339918,0.00057816505,0.004801291,0.0033686669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808966,0.0021933166,0.00069592695,0.00030223792,0.008863808,0.0070480253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032365585,0.00039999172,0.00055995426,0.0036980251,0.03438672,0.008547042,0.0023175692,0.004849244,0.0053064586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012919463,0.00054446777,0.00036926774,0.007979826,0.0042112786,0.0012960593,0.003556909,0.0071677375,0.0005248642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020586328,0.0001699483,0.060967036,0.00090651837,0.00007832386,0.0049876017,0.08401362,0.0007920651,0.0013555954,0.04603911,0.72326744,0.07721691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026285235,0.00005645152,0.1204362,0.00034054543,0.000059494956,0.0005004691,0.11770222,0.00030813855,0.00082689355,0.0008348558,0.75876087,0.00014757787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84374404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15625599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36067364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97862345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2221686015","doi":"","title":"Privatizing Our Public Civil Justice System","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Tribunal; Negotiation; Mediation; Economic Justice; Confidentiality; Law; Dispute resolution; Preference; Political science; Government (linguistics); Federal court; Business; Public administration; Supreme court; Economics","score_opus":0.02791887136536418,"score_gpt":0.333617440620791,"score_spread":0.3056985692554268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2221686015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13808778,0.004172134,0.04975508,0.30603486,0.0014194923,0.00024234562,0.00044172842,0.0019708537,0.49787575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9050259,0.0011846767,0.005270628,0.020933125,0.00088870723,0.00013933958,0.00019047459,0.0001902865,0.06617699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940433,0.0015985329,0.00015169306,0.00097212434,0.0015419632,0.0016924925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918949,0.00199944,0.0007779522,0.0022147745,0.0015470504,0.0015658368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004014934,0.00021699296,0.00037402753,0.0009962707,0.00560343,0.009258605,0.001134068,0.0028769537,0.02196072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010863662,0.00027111507,0.00039490603,0.001291647,0.009860083,0.008286538,0.0070644645,0.0054727853,0.0030934042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029982286,0.000149278,0.0019473098,0.00007913757,0.000024150331,0.00012250358,0.0016374121,0.0018027818,0.0007030313,0.909174,0.036118772,0.04821172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006638246,0.00014610002,0.004615331,0.00024342725,0.000039967126,0.00020998853,0.0025020298,0.0041860896,0.00061527063,0.49746546,0.4898674,0.000042518786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02966627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039083958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02966627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013479629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03290713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09780198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224335529","doi":"","title":"‘Organizational’ Criminal Liability of Partnerships in Canada: Constitutional and Practical Impediments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Business; Criminal liability; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Criminal law; Economics","score_opus":0.07681580872395548,"score_gpt":0.3593067218906695,"score_spread":0.282490913166714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224335529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5363244,0.002256108,0.006763639,0.15908957,0.00024152218,0.00048269762,0.00044962595,0.00015536117,0.29423708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759335,0.0005998187,0.0017594154,0.0070347493,0.00005635952,0.000089771645,0.00007195216,0.000022860757,0.014431677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9726027,0.0039855125,0.0011844792,0.0017310724,0.008721222,0.011775009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9153898,0.035965905,0.0046603284,0.003577102,0.024776544,0.01563036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01564,0.00031817544,0.0006646006,0.0029748827,0.032924965,0.014073085,0.0065844487,0.008966557,0.008844412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064099506,0.0011928509,0.0006491894,0.0042765676,0.012544548,0.004702555,0.008351572,0.00897208,0.00050688663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010616404,0.00027665362,0.050437864,0.0002561467,0.0001183791,0.0017023245,0.024144206,0.0050466093,0.0007718197,0.7892822,0.057852596,0.07000504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042717162,0.00038458372,0.19046448,0.001984356,0.0006447221,0.0021336481,0.13505433,0.023504335,0.003901428,0.25488207,0.3858963,0.0007226276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98265666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99316496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09047759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09047759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38160703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.656464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225766317","doi":"","title":"Thinking About Technology in Canadian Law Schools","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Project commissioning; Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Computer science; Publishing","score_opus":0.024808341477074957,"score_gpt":0.39287580240086106,"score_spread":0.3680674609237861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225766317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18119891,0.0052864905,0.0034111566,0.3031004,0.00064148125,0.00010861982,0.00018347548,0.000085934116,0.50598353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.928975,0.0020996043,0.0013299541,0.012665459,0.000102722865,0.000037956317,0.000046807483,0.00004787419,0.054694567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.982407,0.0051114373,0.00029686434,0.0014104849,0.004582837,0.0061913515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752993,0.007969681,0.0009584335,0.0005008974,0.0072716414,0.007999916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011129499,0.00063061656,0.000546638,0.0059744734,0.062036417,0.03630919,0.0036484683,0.011522647,0.0152745275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023083074,0.00066145597,0.00078675227,0.0069997576,0.052377995,0.010939861,0.006718253,0.013168126,0.0007273344],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026155163,0.000068081914,0.006026293,0.000074331554,0.000011374527,0.0003018702,0.15117432,0.00074721006,0.00015660685,0.789028,0.02990444,0.022481294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035333724,0.000050830316,0.016479606,0.0007482611,0.000057430723,0.00015442705,0.33293134,0.0014641923,0.0004966238,0.15412842,0.4932803,0.00017324691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99301153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6854886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3145114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3763301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79506963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226220211","doi":"10.1017/s073112650001163x","title":"Canadian Constitutional Law: Presentation to the Annual Conference of International Association of Law Libraries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Citizenship; Common law; Gray (unit); Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.02529842659681522,"score_gpt":0.33620099547568516,"score_spread":0.3109025688788699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226220211","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009828909,0.03901974,0.00089866976,0.60673267,0.04585383,0.00063315267,0.0044398857,0.0005792445,0.2920139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057584453,0.022260869,0.002016789,0.031668287,0.009932376,0.0003003988,0.0024663787,0.0002490144,0.8735213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956928,0.00019211338,0.00010713033,0.00030988545,0.0025417963,0.0011563522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951597,0.00021841425,0.000081486105,0.00012580714,0.002347356,0.0020671582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045574266,0.00089996296,0.0006814097,0.003351347,0.023834402,0.011457427,0.0029183517,0.0077553974,0.08449707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065422608,0.00077545975,0.00054257736,0.004858803,0.0036017357,0.0030750206,0.005399515,0.004030267,0.0074209226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018989083,0.000029090712,0.00029296026,0.00006282719,0.000003015426,0.00010460035,0.00048298907,0.000049484406,0.00015572541,0.0043224334,0.9785355,0.015942443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057845855,0.000003134846,0.00088643277,0.000044787947,0.0000025235386,0.000015224765,0.00062379247,0.000038116126,0.000077219804,0.00035839895,0.99793303,0.0000114950935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8989324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97442913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1010676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06280202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16852164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45566267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226222507","doi":"","title":"Ethical Advisor v. 2: A Web-based simulator for teaching ethical decision-making","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical decision; Computer science; Knowledge management; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0870687063557534,"score_gpt":0.4189295249234598,"score_spread":0.33186081856770644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226222507","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2561674,0.000928362,0.5010792,0.017418554,0.0032529684,0.014441535,0.0059501044,0.026512142,0.17424968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3823057,0.0011148942,0.52273214,0.00418078,0.00030240312,0.011871424,0.0028138808,0.0017118797,0.07296692],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975414,0.0016071657,0.00015096462,0.00017942989,0.00032964084,0.00019137828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863847,0.009485913,0.0004080025,0.0009294976,0.00095843617,0.0018334435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005938206,0.0011079009,0.00048025834,0.0007282513,0.00057970564,0.0017972882,0.001740223,0.0023944096,0.047830597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02678931,0.00040979867,0.00061045267,0.00027403448,0.000844119,0.0016096208,0.0021225752,0.0026424143,0.011932027],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031716952,0.01652032,0.016153188,0.0018864186,0.0001349135,0.0018973333,0.007022374,0.039458506,0.014728486,0.036633343,0.3141212,0.5482724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006482181,0.00979058,0.0076944376,0.0014991176,0.00023782068,0.0032767104,0.003166677,0.21254654,0.035229024,0.106132045,0.6134618,0.00048304824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006815903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015209311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047830597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007825333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038422502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16000932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228125395","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1311","title":"Does Community Legal Education Work? Educating English Language Students about Consumer Contracts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legal profession; Legal education; Legal service; Public relations; Legal advice; Legal research; Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.031500144782425334,"score_gpt":0.44243159157489337,"score_spread":0.410931446792468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228125395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91478044,0.0014403376,0.00020311281,0.050656345,0.00014230142,0.000116195,0.000023114404,0.000014886467,0.032623127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901896,0.0015104793,0.00039495062,0.004011851,0.000048409074,0.00006425692,0.000025615105,0.0000058999804,0.0037489403],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949405,0.0026313874,0.00007531937,0.00024036638,0.0006640087,0.0014484726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803571,0.009057732,0.001897002,0.00045134453,0.001277462,0.006959373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072530373,0.00016891622,0.0004313148,0.000979243,0.0058937864,0.004371957,0.0014259822,0.0027937097,0.00919889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022752792,0.00035927942,0.00036388778,0.00096066075,0.0030505224,0.003983293,0.0037312328,0.0027013868,0.0007983947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019983976,0.025395127,0.183166,0.0008085607,0.00010753931,0.0009446454,0.237586,0.00019986434,0.0010436492,0.013566124,0.028537026,0.5084456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046094952,0.0023457285,0.28617528,0.0025129034,0.00017864353,0.00043261042,0.60781693,0.0009797661,0.00120481,0.009673279,0.08811965,0.00009947146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025769925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071911596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025769925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002786564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015901428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051239848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228252687","doi":"10.12968/bjhc.2015.21.7.346","title":"Foundation trust status: Not what it used to be","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Healthcare Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.17721548775882098,"score_gpt":0.4439050273611635,"score_spread":0.26668953960234254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228252687","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032572357,0.005837332,0.00087644905,0.96788734,0.009492883,0.000007182468,0.00006959366,0.00003509184,0.012536857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32272747,0.008259002,0.0019094008,0.6212711,0.0082974015,0.00008112078,0.00017808634,0.0005113543,0.036765184],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9643515,0.012524313,0.002550096,0.0027936157,0.010680913,0.0070995474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87928027,0.04013379,0.010209891,0.0055111647,0.031518098,0.03334676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04149103,0.000630175,0.0011919377,0.002692714,0.011766565,0.023055721,0.0027784002,0.01827156,0.014589905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18495435,0.00085744023,0.0010644479,0.003042807,0.0362701,0.055160433,0.010538345,0.028656373,0.0028942549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092073395,0.00005232109,0.0062078196,0.0003881632,0.00008433971,0.00046460997,0.024772912,0.00010438905,0.00010281084,0.3467117,0.5607445,0.060274366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056180004,0.00007918556,0.0039291563,0.0050626276,0.00009419279,0.0006258627,0.056799974,0.00021577811,0.00025574383,0.13666716,0.79588807,0.0003260664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08512745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.103361085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08512745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021226855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029655358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21942818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228757269","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-34111-8_12","title":"The Corporation as a Legally Created Site of Irresponsibility","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Shadow (psychology); Law; Prosperity; Political science; Legitimacy; Terrorism; Language change","score_opus":0.098542702198789,"score_gpt":0.41346706175295295,"score_spread":0.314924359554164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228757269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061577894,0.0017791623,0.0077206376,0.012893754,0.00039151707,0.000027945634,0.000015994734,0.00004907063,0.97096425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6280568,0.0018350787,0.0053020897,0.0049694134,0.00058451534,0.0001530252,0.00002962065,0.00016339579,0.35890603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958519,0.0019160529,0.000083893196,0.00043842578,0.0011891144,0.00052061095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967673,0.0016591308,0.0002146704,0.0005604503,0.0004573791,0.00034110324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003416188,0.00041891087,0.0004541663,0.0014924748,0.008781898,0.019178307,0.0018103609,0.008122034,0.012914989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059315977,0.00040552524,0.0003640335,0.001286716,0.047690913,0.012360891,0.0063158516,0.011053588,0.0016428761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.4629857e-7,0.0000030490205,0.000012018513,0.0000018487636,3.0958736e-7,0.00001694895,0.00071249116,0.000024235407,0.000010332041,0.9964484,0.0019061498,0.000863661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067577053,0.00001103475,0.00010145528,0.000115078525,0.000004316752,0.00013931212,0.002497844,0.00047366004,0.00022738554,0.79868656,0.1977245,0.000012098573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054303263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008050777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019178307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064285863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009821315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04664284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229848406","doi":"10.1007/978-94-010-0808-2_4","title":"The Tradition of Legal Positivism in Modern Legal Thought","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law and philosophy library","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legal norm; Politics; Positivism; Legal positivism; Law; Political science; Legal formalism; Legal realism; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Legal profession; Philosophy; Comparative law; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.03419044022849431,"score_gpt":0.28291092112268845,"score_spread":0.24872048089419413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229848406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052038166,0.01911964,0.051820215,0.07380099,0.0020083461,0.00003766924,0.00006648068,0.0001729719,0.8477699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5502964,0.022613022,0.027832644,0.03446714,0.006319265,0.00032432406,0.00009433751,0.0005422701,0.35751048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969457,0.0017810813,0.0000744056,0.00027402263,0.0007810744,0.0001438024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99258363,0.005618056,0.00021821857,0.00062425673,0.00070329854,0.00025252483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005504537,0.0004539845,0.00067059207,0.0021949636,0.0046911575,0.008934816,0.0012237991,0.003861109,0.00975173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006845272,0.0003791295,0.00037194614,0.0024752556,0.03699245,0.01049888,0.0026898778,0.010661258,0.0023938266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013452432,0.0000042364145,0.000011964665,0.0000138661035,5.754464e-7,0.0000033863917,0.0006325621,0.000024467248,0.000007676403,0.99427587,0.0028953068,0.0021286467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048807615,0.0000034199973,0.000035659086,0.000058027814,0.0000012103565,0.000018416007,0.0003103043,0.0001659807,0.00005014466,0.926604,0.0727451,0.0000028767918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033280477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045544636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00975173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006286624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005382898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04561287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229952705","doi":"","title":"Rights Protection Without Judicial Supremacy: A Review of the Canadian and British Models of Bills of Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Political science; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Law; Charter; Linguistic rights; Rights of Nature; Democracy; Bill of rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.048509770755257677,"score_gpt":0.362193090053361,"score_spread":0.3136833192981033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229952705","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014964119,0.9916598,0.00014578775,0.0016279401,0.00012512438,0.000009058872,0.000017925795,0.0000033388908,0.0062613375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005131654,0.99287707,0.0003052189,0.0006912515,0.00011034769,0.000014316357,0.000025229383,0.0000033772992,0.0008414997],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523157,0.0010539087,0.0002512925,0.00035462878,0.0028460852,0.00026253582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994423,0.0028019708,0.00044450926,0.00014278233,0.0020073846,0.00018028458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006271002,0.0010088293,0.001776099,0.010069342,0.0024958467,0.0039053538,0.0020979194,0.0024426244,0.003354145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010777845,0.00062523043,0.0004991521,0.020966101,0.006339549,0.0036398964,0.0010064216,0.0023890247,0.0008639766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005458536,0.000049353097,0.00057052064,0.016528625,0.00006171879,0.00019613649,0.0020374916,0.0011118487,0.00020810538,0.19707955,0.10333948,0.67876256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010559401,0.000028169925,0.0025014216,0.010580212,0.000043714605,0.0001530967,0.000492426,0.00014253084,0.00006645618,0.011064248,0.97489023,0.000026936978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46039602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57932377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.973258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02674197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046852633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91543245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232358122","doi":"10.11575/prism/29197","title":"Lexis-Nexis Academic Search Canada - Part 2: Finding Canadian Legal Information","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Business; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09256621747561508,"score_gpt":0.4055931971805077,"score_spread":0.31302697970489257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232358122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00443868,0.009301694,0.012490744,0.05046183,0.0019117197,0.001298864,0.016492443,0.002365204,0.90123886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02645775,0.018342435,0.02927924,0.0076049343,0.0006435066,0.0003838627,0.015843349,0.0014063683,0.9000385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601233,0.0003649193,0.00021283343,0.00026608087,0.0024332793,0.0007104312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99348676,0.002013177,0.00024709856,0.00019384967,0.0030558568,0.0010033774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030469976,0.000756506,0.00099427,0.014803228,0.010654406,0.010497166,0.0021406973,0.002929714,0.1938518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012744709,0.0007117596,0.0007559356,0.020167695,0.0028758037,0.0070322435,0.0027285588,0.0016982228,0.05369527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001289979,0.000020755619,0.0008049777,0.00031577525,0.0000040024843,0.00010029083,0.0010521129,0.00012995739,0.00034963404,0.021843966,0.8782196,0.097146004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039724064,0.0000061065084,0.0011559883,0.00019843034,0.0000043755017,0.00007808657,0.001679865,0.00019544062,0.00027528577,0.0028553812,0.99351865,0.000028381997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.839578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9481473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1938518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034222182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09507375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6484989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233331656","doi":"","title":"A Better Understanding of How to Become a Lawyer in Canada: Regulations and Implementation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Law; Political science; Residence; Minor (academic); Legal profession; Legal education; Citizenship; Sociology","score_opus":0.03461954725349416,"score_gpt":0.3398930355755028,"score_spread":0.3052734883220087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233331656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15909223,0.018365648,0.013702562,0.49605656,0.0018056565,0.0009325591,0.001305451,0.0005448873,0.30819446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.871998,0.014421203,0.015075848,0.039284837,0.0002025954,0.00029153182,0.00050195376,0.00017580653,0.058048178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771383,0.0030250992,0.0008117657,0.0016563203,0.0103120515,0.0070563965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95024395,0.0064043845,0.0030616391,0.0009352703,0.025351183,0.014003605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014097626,0.00044275945,0.00040935806,0.0032787637,0.018422714,0.012726609,0.003457425,0.004474419,0.0067354385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038143042,0.00061623135,0.0006578348,0.005104398,0.008454553,0.004598445,0.0037533394,0.0069414447,0.0006673014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007060831,0.00046287494,0.08767099,0.001056186,0.000056458965,0.0012822109,0.061832774,0.004166944,0.0026617646,0.3545693,0.1465637,0.33960617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004398994,0.00014667411,0.23134378,0.0022369407,0.000055361066,0.00025501073,0.07865167,0.0027568792,0.0012280099,0.014683864,0.66823053,0.00036722192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99353445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.763701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23629898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.52323127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8857849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235928116","doi":"","title":"The D ivide Within (Not Between) Liberal Arts and Professional Education","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections Canadian Journal of Music","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal arts education; Liberal education; The arts; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Sociology; Visual arts; Political science; Art; Higher education; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.03698551778382118,"score_gpt":0.3348344261495152,"score_spread":0.297848908365694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235928116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033364892,0.0028439173,0.0060884985,0.033537347,0.0008210385,0.00003006311,0.000053919448,0.00005168971,0.9232088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8831306,0.0010273036,0.0024647987,0.0049979454,0.00033141545,0.000041360236,0.000041721818,0.00006829577,0.10789644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992277,0.0027509858,0.00018939245,0.0009908184,0.0021008735,0.0016908689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954268,0.0010948377,0.00032843862,0.00048369198,0.0009184022,0.0017476887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027082271,0.0002183326,0.0003879228,0.0023695743,0.014900526,0.025835497,0.0010474494,0.0045041447,0.033999003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007678544,0.00040825672,0.00034032323,0.0022883748,0.02461457,0.011973524,0.012829364,0.006136888,0.003453389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018973338,0.00003441888,0.0025516327,0.000034158493,0.000006117141,0.000066720895,0.010312803,0.000042951327,0.00024010947,0.9465479,0.0073777414,0.032766454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017024675,0.00005595938,0.009257683,0.00034599882,0.000017162456,0.0001873653,0.06805799,0.00016515813,0.000504802,0.3515518,0.5698098,0.000029223345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025041876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05999711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033999003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011132911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019637518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2236753730","doi":"","title":"Defining Moments for Women as Lawyers: Reflections on the Impact of Numerical Gender Equality","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.2360369209226907,"score_gpt":0.5452415023401602,"score_spread":0.30920458141746954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2236753730","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04473296,0.008328891,0.0021610963,0.81520903,0.005079427,0.000045536108,0.00004172432,0.000043032785,0.124358274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7323081,0.0046493886,0.00086307246,0.20949908,0.0026051835,0.00012644727,0.000020138315,0.00019325252,0.04973549],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97980493,0.0137615455,0.00025536405,0.00085337926,0.001991437,0.0033333558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779112,0.01618221,0.0012129119,0.00034678355,0.0016073063,0.0027396588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015719453,0.000598446,0.00070022384,0.0012752527,0.048076395,0.019914875,0.0036454566,0.015657261,0.0071119606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026654352,0.0007306043,0.0006788187,0.0012444811,0.06201352,0.016514115,0.012771013,0.021585107,0.0008967713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022268185,0.000019516792,0.0003693392,0.00006229693,0.0000030839203,0.00067884923,0.79487747,0.000025601452,0.00020839526,0.16266781,0.037200995,0.003864381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008078381,0.000016697897,0.0003573264,0.00020859567,0.0000040063182,0.00015415036,0.7446503,0.000027877231,0.00016357786,0.010849181,0.24354002,0.000020109419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11609572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2291441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11609572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026291484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020118691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23083997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238610639","doi":"","title":"The Changing Landscape of Canadian Legal Education","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Consumerism; Internationalization; Jurisdiction; Ranking (information retrieval); Control (management); Political science; Legal education; Cult; Higher education; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Business; Economics; Management; International trade","score_opus":0.014493483399624316,"score_gpt":0.31981797046611027,"score_spread":0.30532448706648596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238610639","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10631126,0.02563757,0.001777229,0.50191504,0.0015629595,0.00008772715,0.0008685775,0.00017157618,0.36166808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8780926,0.015301088,0.0025747493,0.030495634,0.0004638959,0.000056827284,0.00031559682,0.00009196636,0.07260767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899503,0.0011502731,0.00017277141,0.0008437163,0.0035804997,0.0043024467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99023813,0.0010366077,0.00042566846,0.00016014944,0.003705265,0.004434224],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042694584,0.00039341825,0.00047691553,0.00503335,0.034413178,0.014721183,0.0022910468,0.0037309988,0.02185925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010042233,0.00046493043,0.00048447945,0.007940815,0.015552741,0.0035881223,0.004383333,0.004842272,0.00085044897],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010068785,0.000077292585,0.013121492,0.0005501831,0.000029177303,0.0012351066,0.03543635,0.0014207871,0.00093550043,0.6834175,0.1201384,0.14353752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000180386,0.00002772168,0.03238395,0.00038966685,0.000018595701,0.00022626562,0.02661808,0.00052281615,0.00017789222,0.014110564,0.92539227,0.00011403726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96558684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29874223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30367246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8133596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238677722","doi":"10.11575/prism/34073","title":"\"I'm from the government and I'm here to serve you\"","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02247029077137257,"score_gpt":0.2665325800596636,"score_spread":0.24406228928829105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238677722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007975164,0.0030781515,0.0023816754,0.20438385,0.0136910295,0.00022090184,0.0007370202,0.0011467802,0.76638544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027911076,0.0015884498,0.0012843714,0.035857078,0.0003709506,0.000051196035,0.0003468214,0.0001993648,0.9323907],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972084,0.0004126165,0.0000515525,0.0002696944,0.0010818329,0.0009759217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962392,0.00007736787,0.0001080123,0.000113247515,0.0014369399,0.0020253134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013603469,0.00044199554,0.00034886308,0.0005360589,0.011292502,0.007514951,0.00091101945,0.0017838012,0.12757477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039581903,0.0003395796,0.0003169638,0.00072023063,0.002641536,0.0035097285,0.004732181,0.005825151,0.074828975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009158216,0.000016600176,0.0006974527,0.000024411338,0.000002006258,0.000056794397,0.0012196221,0.0000075662833,0.00016029888,0.0048656603,0.96829146,0.02464905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023351442,0.000009784155,0.0010175135,0.00004743966,0.0000022937772,0.00009798184,0.003495627,0.00001171763,0.0000717553,0.00044054553,0.994795,0.000008002291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12353892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27679116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12757477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006797876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017554337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4267801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238753268","doi":"","title":"Uncivil advocacy: An intensifying spotlight on incivility in advocacy cannot be ignored [online]","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incivility; Context (archaeology); Reputation; Political science; Law; Public relations; Work (physics); Engineering","score_opus":0.07800053383653593,"score_gpt":0.31619037278018464,"score_spread":0.2381898389436487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238753268","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026873322,0.017677154,0.0034243995,0.7250717,0.004183376,0.00003057404,0.00008777208,0.00024091962,0.22241075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62479544,0.012300078,0.002604579,0.2747341,0.0034215595,0.00006563516,0.00012187682,0.00041718196,0.081539586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99356306,0.0023953465,0.00012220892,0.0003870545,0.0024345694,0.0010977332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98467535,0.008678142,0.00094157766,0.00087783486,0.0022409074,0.0025862092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007318769,0.00040469845,0.00036392527,0.0017277497,0.014580365,0.019944927,0.002003787,0.0070694494,0.02192265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013453003,0.00036732559,0.00029608695,0.001582327,0.036351986,0.014338365,0.009694756,0.013292749,0.0021143318],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030473391,0.000051069306,0.0020313368,0.00026362855,0.000011405311,0.00053498463,0.09347634,0.0000616443,0.000620969,0.52890754,0.28149265,0.09251793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008997691,0.00001858209,0.002274412,0.000637853,0.0000071702407,0.00036532638,0.03840725,0.00013550711,0.00031261268,0.049053274,0.90875477,0.000024239314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06951933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18229511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06951933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014572168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016950639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13822937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240623186","doi":"","title":"Lack of advancement of black and female lawyers in the spotlight : news","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"De Rebus","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Kingdom; Association (psychology); Professional association; Psychology","score_opus":0.16523324727033356,"score_gpt":0.4447777070400689,"score_spread":0.27954445976973535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240623186","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001950504,0.010682424,0.000114357455,0.950988,0.02258861,0.000011905585,0.00014015363,0.000059823407,0.013464184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04819228,0.04321639,0.0007984368,0.7640834,0.066855535,0.00010509031,0.00055655633,0.00022829135,0.07596403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974558,0.0004117592,0.00022800348,0.00028873677,0.0010328032,0.00058288174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741796,0.01176878,0.0014909281,0.0006919809,0.004593205,0.007275509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006263105,0.00034244865,0.00030258053,0.00069369934,0.0026225757,0.0051141926,0.0011469441,0.009087227,0.01791341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020291613,0.0003926299,0.00047146887,0.0008609884,0.0016924903,0.004612993,0.0016991082,0.011163426,0.005565474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050232054,0.000037842296,0.0007859991,0.00018526093,0.0000049232794,0.00013537714,0.00036151736,0.000009595801,0.00017343575,0.0017859461,0.92941564,0.067054324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000169821,0.00004958556,0.0035256604,0.00060188945,0.000009097659,0.00018810766,0.0012393541,0.000025908243,0.00020722712,0.000561032,0.9935626,0.000012593514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008366971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022764599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01791341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002686554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041735624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05992627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241185470","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.2.299","title":"A Spotlight on Judicial Regulation in Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review","score_opus":0.1447894613108209,"score_gpt":0.46972922479564977,"score_spread":0.3249397634848289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241185470","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01135002,0.07492646,0.0016222546,0.8722492,0.0066721383,0.000030817442,0.00007935603,0.00005633371,0.033013463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35250247,0.077859595,0.006081423,0.4761516,0.008657675,0.00014611954,0.00012888388,0.00012731762,0.07834492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914826,0.0024579747,0.00045970152,0.0006625888,0.0034243534,0.001512904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818981,0.0074540237,0.0015396007,0.0005807879,0.0048791436,0.0036482855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011901081,0.00028752518,0.00068705285,0.0015394753,0.0055020214,0.008200738,0.001494113,0.014256983,0.009473602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019285979,0.00066976843,0.00069882517,0.0012680152,0.00918926,0.008858728,0.0067029935,0.017268637,0.0012159692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006240318,0.000116790805,0.0015947799,0.0009998459,0.000019609684,0.0006742218,0.009748838,0.0003692145,0.0020101573,0.44039488,0.42763528,0.11637394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034945606,0.00013730672,0.018299893,0.0018842458,0.00002420554,0.0004028217,0.0041824877,0.0007368585,0.0006526076,0.08754609,0.8860085,0.00009001944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050863132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07403446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050863132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009004718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02839471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10113418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242208570","doi":"10.7202/1070369ar","title":"Teachers and the Law, 3rd Edition (MacKay, Sutherland, &amp; Pochini)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12569325266739348,"score_gpt":0.4154541026955374,"score_spread":0.2897608500281439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242208570","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018743359,0.474343,0.004276003,0.054782685,0.010754479,0.00009169246,0.0013589802,0.00034360893,0.45217523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048509844,0.24476041,0.0066488227,0.012896757,0.0059151645,0.0004191455,0.0008826607,0.00035665458,0.67961055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994473,0.00013361943,0.000044943474,0.00007045091,0.00025791803,0.000045778535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899155,0.00057019474,0.00006288745,0.00007334011,0.00022144386,0.00008069551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013542874,0.0012437962,0.0005941491,0.0034171848,0.0027349982,0.0062452354,0.0011468071,0.0036066826,0.030768147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031526634,0.0009052645,0.00032473818,0.0029827696,0.003748468,0.0070241303,0.0016930527,0.0032165362,0.0075009083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011906712,0.000055968438,0.0005762481,0.00034785632,0.000005961154,0.00007747709,0.004905577,0.000106265965,0.00010236197,0.15569928,0.72642446,0.11168674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046825935,0.000008565435,0.0017277031,0.00051150523,0.0000043801856,0.00013057933,0.0016967539,0.00006938966,0.000053712443,0.025624203,0.97016317,0.0000053311455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030447915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07830583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030768147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036102952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005667739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10292971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242834126","doi":"","title":"Gender, Identity and Professionalism: A Review of the First Women Lawyers by Mary Jane Mossman","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Gender studies; Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Suffrage; Legal education; Distancing; Law; White (mutation); Political science; Mythology; Sociology; Politics; History; Art","score_opus":0.09938109716569403,"score_gpt":0.4560765653725017,"score_spread":0.35669546820680764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242834126","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00082958484,0.9738124,0.0001100865,0.018923113,0.0020477616,0.000007002099,0.000010044192,0.0000054335555,0.0042546256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009657207,0.96593916,0.0003397465,0.013812989,0.0034726083,0.000040083607,0.0000284324,0.0000277908,0.006681953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968791,0.001330902,0.00023306355,0.00022376596,0.0010173566,0.00031577313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887876,0.0082925875,0.000575301,0.00010590623,0.0016625952,0.0005759914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039381557,0.0006101569,0.0011999707,0.0065233517,0.006284978,0.0060819276,0.001492897,0.004173537,0.0041536908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00894505,0.00073157693,0.00036903968,0.0094567165,0.0059838234,0.007175714,0.0030775296,0.006279015,0.0012617325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007348033,0.00014395124,0.0017063238,0.0072997366,0.000035765446,0.0009586235,0.09275556,0.00009570125,0.0003921845,0.042573046,0.43652743,0.41743818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029920502,0.000035836852,0.0013953889,0.0061548976,0.000007661248,0.00047345023,0.012611465,0.000011563254,0.000058120215,0.0014537914,0.9777796,0.000015271575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039197728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090708874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039197728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006953209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009904617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07793915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243129715","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Therapeutic Jurisprudence: A Phenomenological Study of Toronto's Mental Health Court","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Society for Social Work and Research 17th Annual Conference: Social Work for a Just Society: Making Visible the Stakes and Stakeholders","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Therapeutic jurisprudence; Jurisprudence; Mental health; Mental health law; Law; Mental Health Act; Interpretative phenomenological analysis; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Psychiatry; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.2724717186400282,"score_gpt":0.4919627214988163,"score_spread":0.2194910028587881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243129715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9431133,0.001317045,0.00092507945,0.021577353,0.00022857374,0.00019845596,0.00024908505,0.000026123102,0.032364994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929283,0.00038138838,0.00022526993,0.0013190056,0.0000337591,0.0000603672,0.000043923053,0.000042603937,0.0049654315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98706055,0.008105435,0.00035809388,0.0008117448,0.0009184621,0.0027457005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961506,0.026162574,0.0026075328,0.0011242214,0.002210333,0.00638938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007010106,0.000803079,0.0010480534,0.002914317,0.08073424,0.018341938,0.0051657753,0.006970793,0.008269889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032492813,0.0013768504,0.00067730487,0.00497843,0.04504885,0.0078207785,0.01817996,0.017549396,0.00047324743],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009855369,0.000011296801,0.0007128103,0.000018999295,0.0000023032278,0.00070203264,0.99523574,0.000023067261,0.000065402295,0.0021459758,0.0006202147,0.000452281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027191984,0.000006912043,0.0010884758,0.00004724226,0.0000029434707,0.0000895156,0.99297404,0.000028471215,0.00003075004,0.00021591937,0.00550355,0.0000094373945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6865384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.882167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3134616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09712687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06291557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7047081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243732879","doi":"","title":"The High Price of Success: The Backlash Against Women Judges in Australia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Political science; Compromise; Blueprint; Politics; Legal profession; Public administration; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.025671593824668052,"score_gpt":0.278211033698592,"score_spread":0.25253943987392397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243732879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14296088,0.022755574,0.0010135409,0.15888134,0.003243065,0.00009343594,0.000026253496,0.00004941807,0.6709766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49792764,0.0068019857,0.00045156665,0.013997431,0.00032218918,0.000055294502,0.000008706187,0.00005646166,0.48037875],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559695,0.0012582912,0.00006508021,0.00029974437,0.0017436038,0.0010363667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813205,0.000564611,0.00010535981,0.000055926615,0.00055220386,0.00058996107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029680722,0.00025868477,0.00037437194,0.00097160257,0.020018447,0.009098685,0.0010799303,0.0031517942,0.0044168914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050623007,0.0003756876,0.00021920449,0.0011023659,0.012952109,0.0032342118,0.0041398616,0.004933491,0.0006001255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022824826,0.00004126536,0.0029311012,0.00019465477,0.000010510786,0.000959458,0.45156765,0.000117939446,0.0005062603,0.3334738,0.13942344,0.07075112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065712356,0.000044066965,0.007444872,0.0004224077,0.000014069503,0.000276027,0.10898033,0.00021858596,0.00027214232,0.015525231,0.8667629,0.00003281484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55801535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7975317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55801535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02141052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04017299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8891752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245227172","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2022555","title":"Alberta MLA Compensation in Perspective and Recommendations for Changes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fraser Institute; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Compensation (psychology); Business; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.044666853419041586,"score_gpt":0.3989797047774688,"score_spread":0.3543128513584272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245227172","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064134644,0.005485991,0.0010887843,0.7271426,0.016229806,0.00019521032,0.0013760419,0.00039463042,0.24167345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10781071,0.005493895,0.00677681,0.3615985,0.005626444,0.00025707544,0.0013424715,0.00024687164,0.5108473],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98063916,0.0028590974,0.0009759498,0.0011914911,0.009231854,0.005102539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97690976,0.0047162836,0.000629234,0.0008131226,0.011688911,0.0052426867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122191375,0.00076002313,0.00090171007,0.0045468025,0.007593283,0.016806806,0.0062272535,0.034162425,0.06590579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041315764,0.00078613136,0.0014194024,0.0033580111,0.0032887314,0.006177666,0.0033398725,0.015018768,0.0061035235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085404106,0.000114230475,0.001675676,0.00012898415,0.00002538996,0.0003307628,0.0005321857,0.00056206697,0.00025613917,0.06745035,0.9003499,0.028488956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011344619,0.0000636171,0.009362169,0.00077976973,0.00006575242,0.00018172097,0.0030958378,0.0010026292,0.0005128355,0.01971785,0.96495837,0.00014589414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59245616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75956106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40754384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02764654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12762032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8198879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245833277","doi":"","title":"Open Access to Outcomes of Publicly Funded Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Declaration; Free access; Political science; Permission; Relevance (law); Field (mathematics); Public relations; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.3965078419720008,"score_gpt":0.5874013646412969,"score_spread":0.1908935226692961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245833277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05892189,0.014675193,0.07230836,0.2854645,0.0030016275,0.0006761589,0.0022562956,0.00044142324,0.5622546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95379555,0.0042176927,0.010917353,0.00894925,0.0021260781,0.0012504286,0.00075289945,0.0001765353,0.017814163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7284052,0.1907261,0.008388994,0.008025954,0.055815093,0.008638788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57398283,0.28070536,0.043747,0.05059159,0.037716866,0.013256345],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13891807,0.0006137728,0.0016415017,0.0060958024,0.005383347,0.022102429,0.0034454032,0.0058473707,0.016053976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39508682,0.00056951743,0.0010112021,0.00876916,0.029553276,0.019239679,0.025794413,0.0069343257,0.0014792954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059536527,0.00005234445,0.0021104482,0.00028928655,0.00003710365,0.000061384606,0.005100011,0.0002711729,0.00006879899,0.95886767,0.0054443036,0.027637878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065125234,0.000095046635,0.0051725805,0.0015106032,0.000051952822,0.00008516001,0.0036564951,0.00048176982,0.0004269154,0.88742214,0.10096823,0.00006403672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055297106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039552515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014519216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027060313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7346778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245844754","doi":"","title":"Making and Breaking Rank: Some Thoughts on Recent Canadian Law School Surveys","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Accountability; Normative; Legal education; Humanism; Rank (graph theory); Diversity (politics); Political science; Law; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Sociology","score_opus":0.059443849659140305,"score_gpt":0.35460959886410776,"score_spread":0.29516574920496746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245844754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09768337,0.095858656,0.011023077,0.5916536,0.004510662,0.0005637282,0.007314524,0.0002508897,0.19114155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74415594,0.09076288,0.018947866,0.084608495,0.0025764925,0.000706005,0.0038408872,0.00033132895,0.0540701],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97074306,0.008179578,0.0016406936,0.0015648218,0.013454893,0.0044169533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89687246,0.030201035,0.004374172,0.0028804478,0.062258918,0.0034130013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042974867,0.00077640876,0.00084234483,0.024334434,0.018013366,0.0152194705,0.004683814,0.0034810086,0.004755209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09928723,0.0007384046,0.00077101175,0.040597264,0.012693059,0.00789987,0.0039674244,0.0048422744,0.0003906452],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012140173,0.00007620804,0.07016874,0.0013457959,0.000092276474,0.0003444283,0.085249834,0.0011762637,0.0002357194,0.28393993,0.27263498,0.28461447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029916473,0.000059740152,0.16384973,0.0033932477,0.00010903916,0.00014409004,0.11147533,0.001508953,0.00041598754,0.017402321,0.7012659,0.000345873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9926387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99437296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8749451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12505488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06970709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9073409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246454847","doi":"","title":"The Justice System and Social Inclusion in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Economic Justice; Social justice; Sociology; Criminology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.022778954480289843,"score_gpt":0.3444479922687626,"score_spread":0.3216690377884728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246454847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80083907,0.0060086753,0.00042473117,0.09201479,0.00050798914,0.00014893009,0.0015024819,0.000064830725,0.09848848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97951907,0.0014316527,0.0002102363,0.0027045526,0.0000599577,0.00002885834,0.00016492039,0.000020429172,0.015860379],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898537,0.00087983493,0.0002049286,0.00042590388,0.002038712,0.006596903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97871494,0.0020365678,0.0012257415,0.00025221737,0.0052344454,0.0125359865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031342427,0.00033570584,0.0012861002,0.0041512004,0.032864936,0.011212294,0.0034162952,0.0035088381,0.017126406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01666379,0.0005581798,0.0009703763,0.00727439,0.006742831,0.0023043281,0.007229988,0.0056387368,0.00046491873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048825212,0.0012088806,0.44929895,0.00049629115,0.00040281398,0.0019858016,0.047737822,0.0037517955,0.0004296496,0.269855,0.10066324,0.123681515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026397643,0.00018125144,0.7218409,0.0011535098,0.00036905432,0.00035320484,0.07412672,0.004582846,0.00055052893,0.025440214,0.17078437,0.00035337836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99856704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99951434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2237396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2237396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47715595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90035206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247310989","doi":"","title":"Letter to the Editor: Diversity Missing","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tokenism; Diversity (politics); White (mutation); Political science; Gender studies; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.022567680265519408,"score_gpt":0.32126084665747334,"score_spread":0.2986931663919539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247310989","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006265329,0.0007380827,0.000045208042,0.96355957,0.029807784,0.000015118958,0.000034936365,0.000028193186,0.005144637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0052919127,0.0004562562,0.00009059889,0.9627305,0.01895968,0.00002896068,0.000014020974,0.00001680772,0.012411233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722004,0.00058737386,0.00021704976,0.0005133671,0.0009299114,0.00053229684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425924,0.0025258856,0.00028105688,0.00018057613,0.0011033993,0.0016499581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033174104,0.0006850665,0.0008893853,0.00058679533,0.006432505,0.004428983,0.0020979333,0.039572548,0.012282655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021508045,0.00071773044,0.0010156668,0.00064079073,0.0019155972,0.004077561,0.0016449076,0.035724435,0.0054158694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002073512,0.000022282122,0.00029844895,0.000027842005,0.0000042864085,0.0013943166,0.00017427925,0.000018898116,0.000081259044,0.0010425255,0.99255615,0.0043590325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000657229,0.00005743003,0.0013861165,0.00023586629,0.000015081562,0.002588035,0.0010268955,0.00020366267,0.00015714255,0.0026224118,0.99160683,0.000034833705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004539608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009475444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039572548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003729248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006868418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041089535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248818042","doi":"","title":"Dispute Resolution and Legal Education: A Bibliography","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Political science; Bibliography; Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Resolution (logic); Conflict resolution; Resource (disambiguation); Dispute mechanism; Law; Legal education; Public administration; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02397295467399001,"score_gpt":0.3812732769255093,"score_spread":0.35730032225151925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248818042","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024793536,0.9396558,0.0010479167,0.0034077798,0.0015021389,0.00002124666,0.00008302861,0.000020904337,0.054013263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005406778,0.9689199,0.0017610951,0.003189065,0.0027427718,0.00007454664,0.00024233539,0.00003412076,0.017629486],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800867,0.00067757606,0.0002830962,0.00016291584,0.0007261327,0.00014161636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941462,0.0045833318,0.00027022144,0.0001882327,0.0006354836,0.00017653238],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001649523,0.0009660793,0.0012170845,0.014700588,0.002907147,0.007347478,0.0016263911,0.0041136667,0.020061508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069135614,0.0005168385,0.0006290055,0.032259837,0.004042013,0.0066053974,0.002647598,0.003344092,0.00467389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041872536,0.00019085883,0.0004277492,0.009389663,0.00002505663,0.0003031464,0.002595872,0.0009200457,0.00022508472,0.14053577,0.41477418,0.43057063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058203955,0.0000133549975,0.000628841,0.0076106903,0.000008888052,0.00022445465,0.0005675844,0.00007598234,0.000049072532,0.029559093,0.96124464,0.000011584183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062465435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009708445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039161104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054550874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067112505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249650766","doi":"","title":"La Commission du droit d’auteur du Canada : vingt années à « faire » l’histoire juridique","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Auteur theory; Commission; Humanities; Ethnology; Art; History; Law; Art history","score_opus":0.015876759819563515,"score_gpt":0.2740716894729142,"score_spread":0.2581949296533507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249650766","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12528096,0.036105733,0.0041365493,0.43725565,0.0073208436,0.00038056378,0.0036897524,0.0003932723,0.38543674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33659896,0.009312968,0.0042413417,0.033264723,0.0004672099,0.00017527123,0.0006143034,0.00020950551,0.6151157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99164504,0.00061729527,0.00025888605,0.0004398419,0.0039982446,0.0030407093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920719,0.0012821325,0.00031959725,0.000258554,0.0040491177,0.0020186862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003555858,0.0005250458,0.0007220653,0.0016503078,0.020010492,0.010682483,0.002125392,0.007112099,0.01733455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012896825,0.0008471197,0.0006756075,0.0026653456,0.0048245997,0.0022033344,0.00348103,0.00915898,0.0011032962],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017675509,0.00007986884,0.014500811,0.00055064214,0.00010420756,0.0013984565,0.024242656,0.0010652693,0.001610134,0.47239977,0.40557456,0.078296885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002513918,0.00001513907,0.015810683,0.00036864803,0.000026102172,0.000117292926,0.007708672,0.00021016263,0.00057969266,0.0031166114,0.9719487,0.00007334015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.883725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11627501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37081283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8436382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2251680096","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.2.224","title":"Critical Indigenous Legal Theory Part 1: The Dialogue Within","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Feeling; Publishing; Consciousness; Law; Sociology; Project commissioning; Practice of law; Political science; Legal profession; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06063740446722613,"score_gpt":0.3302824035192133,"score_spread":0.26964499905198713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2251680096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08072455,0.014439076,0.020254305,0.108563505,0.0016762025,0.00026760157,0.000067834524,0.00009865405,0.7739083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94064385,0.003227974,0.004074122,0.006472926,0.00041083823,0.00020792628,0.000025124085,0.00008295548,0.044854283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98573965,0.00975744,0.00020345619,0.0010383398,0.0019519774,0.0013091551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99003893,0.007042871,0.00055043603,0.0005261793,0.0011168047,0.00072465907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011800297,0.00055312493,0.00059407187,0.0028457795,0.024251524,0.013634456,0.0029625131,0.0062640877,0.006098201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014260563,0.00039254947,0.00046146024,0.0025577934,0.092894234,0.016211912,0.008755932,0.008814291,0.0005789519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003973047,0.000010880643,0.0001483118,0.00006868402,0.000001563944,0.00017727286,0.24653506,0.00004722439,0.000068203546,0.74822354,0.0026019132,0.002113456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007391004,0.000022014576,0.00056831323,0.0007532658,0.000008207205,0.0003396814,0.35771072,0.00049336,0.0003530646,0.2978077,0.34190804,0.000028318458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09305947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06972541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029663984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022620628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21522826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252636363","doi":"","title":"Response to the Consultation Paper of the Task Force on the Canadian Common Law Degree of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Canadian Association of Law Teachers/Canadian Law and Society Association","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Carleton University; McGill University; University of Victoria; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Task force; Association (psychology); Political science; Public law; Common law; Comparative law; Degree (music); Civil law (Civil law); Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.018014524385285058,"score_gpt":0.2655263977926403,"score_spread":0.24751187340735525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252636363","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008700418,0.001036588,0.00039645348,0.9205781,0.056653604,0.00062628614,0.0018935339,0.00012406954,0.017821219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00789184,0.001321879,0.000861325,0.8261092,0.01218873,0.0010440996,0.0008173115,0.00020641413,0.14955929],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862585,0.0020196151,0.001163675,0.001153198,0.0061335084,0.0032715318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96027136,0.009729736,0.0010780486,0.00054596673,0.02198014,0.006394812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008818729,0.0013998495,0.0017632357,0.002259701,0.012827178,0.004534041,0.0035239493,0.043480996,0.045285866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0543369,0.0012550702,0.0017004911,0.0020652597,0.0027214668,0.0026759785,0.0034904047,0.028613428,0.01811884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016866841,0.0000064092314,0.0000533609,0.000029095745,0.0000018721266,0.00006901391,0.00010546593,0.000014917108,0.00007671712,0.00039996565,0.9985354,0.00069091155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007555823,0.000034557073,0.0019472209,0.00025851524,0.000016734535,0.000080282116,0.0019660373,0.00012330327,0.00018020823,0.00063712156,0.9945802,0.00010038605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42322007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54540473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9697296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030270422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07967136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8415133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253039580","doi":"","title":"Building on Strong Foundations: Rethinking Legal Education with A View to Improving Curricular Quality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Curriculum; Graduation (instrument); Context (archaeology); Foundation (evidence); Economic Justice; Engineering ethics; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Legal profession; Sociology; Identification (biology); Pedagogy; Law; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05973543340366949,"score_gpt":0.40556628563814556,"score_spread":0.34583085223447607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253039580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16438018,0.007977933,0.04966781,0.6787112,0.0018806207,0.00033850042,0.000072989016,0.00063600135,0.09633476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94379103,0.0026238926,0.030882709,0.014982453,0.00027876077,0.00011705912,0.000047130015,0.00012464171,0.007152304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9743692,0.01088154,0.0008931815,0.0012791244,0.008126277,0.0044506667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9418701,0.023770355,0.003729483,0.00490835,0.012587426,0.013134236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044773236,0.00041825906,0.0005896925,0.0038856356,0.011615709,0.018405885,0.003232016,0.0040180464,0.0032224597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08491919,0.00063369045,0.00048773715,0.0025846076,0.031126399,0.015561519,0.017158365,0.011691809,0.00042335837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042978172,0.0002909902,0.014537013,0.00047143784,0.000023903305,0.00023169548,0.09400517,0.0016719167,0.0013276285,0.4911531,0.025293019,0.37095124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009732348,0.0005049112,0.053348895,0.002744915,0.00005947852,0.00020172664,0.11271883,0.004108253,0.0027182605,0.4636113,0.35969725,0.00018880705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21713282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32895213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21713282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05272926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14919971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4317379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253580093","doi":"","title":"'...And the Learners Shall Inherit the Earth': Continuing Professional Development, Life Long Learning and Legal Ethics Education","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Lifelong learning; Engineering ethics; Legal ethics; Legal education; Resistance (ecology); Pedagogy; Political science; Learning society; Professional development; Continuing education; Professional ethics; Legal profession; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.0175674436311244,"score_gpt":0.3609743071289443,"score_spread":0.3434068634978199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253580093","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13969702,0.014757391,0.0072416365,0.55163234,0.0007797582,0.000095854055,0.000027873419,0.000051446714,0.28571665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946881,0.0029604463,0.0029143782,0.015536894,0.00013928059,0.000061443716,0.000015092914,0.00001622142,0.031475224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99493766,0.0032537237,0.00006412953,0.00020128749,0.0007654346,0.0007776764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534,0.002362414,0.0003138974,0.00013724061,0.00051622826,0.00133028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056819376,0.00024519174,0.00017336188,0.0005615365,0.009631287,0.0066262535,0.001009358,0.00490782,0.003113395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009899578,0.00011310078,0.00012712397,0.0007164068,0.03302676,0.004454212,0.0043501016,0.0041451966,0.00029609486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019616265,0.0001126858,0.002494353,0.000110898356,0.0000036748681,0.0005952029,0.17963883,0.00016137018,0.00022447338,0.7174006,0.02702554,0.07221272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036391142,0.000118721386,0.009667156,0.00067647634,0.000011495744,0.00078666396,0.1742118,0.00069675065,0.0006716576,0.32883343,0.48422676,0.0000626615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17429224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31476215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17429224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013422723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031388126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34655547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254235657","doi":"","title":"Wigmore's Chart","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Dialectic; Premise; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Rhetoric; Humanities; Argument map; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04691223052577434,"score_gpt":0.3771612344128916,"score_spread":0.3302490038871173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254235657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011430098,0.0021977653,0.31918085,0.018469233,0.0028769744,0.0006408604,0.001487244,0.0024627692,0.64125425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18635827,0.0034340434,0.34475738,0.002832304,0.00055790367,0.0009161358,0.0011620572,0.0012705078,0.45871148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971796,0.00087497086,0.0001364114,0.0006085694,0.0010076191,0.00019277696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620736,0.0012901786,0.00025332178,0.0009217457,0.0010984761,0.00022890868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029595867,0.0005325563,0.00027477462,0.0026150332,0.003301167,0.0070441035,0.0014396784,0.0021460769,0.02822044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014512073,0.0003867473,0.00044149172,0.0028455118,0.0043919883,0.00896235,0.0026550551,0.002467597,0.005492118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027541137,0.000014914583,0.00031127364,0.00009138948,0.0000027547298,0.00006513553,0.003068698,0.0003249712,0.0004824072,0.84078014,0.061097153,0.09373356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009116664,0.00002208697,0.00031414823,0.00016156699,0.000005144627,0.00007553826,0.0007123492,0.000932938,0.00085901294,0.08204179,0.9148443,0.000022034457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012075319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01822182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02822044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037491485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062116063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09440678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254314256","doi":"","title":"Human Rights and the Model Rules of Professional Conduct: Intersection and Integration","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Legal ethics; Reservation of rights; Obligation; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.02465487964922645,"score_gpt":0.3731315263090802,"score_spread":0.34847664665985373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254314256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021827066,0.026071573,0.17037168,0.09198763,0.0017581353,0.0002067639,0.00009819473,0.00012646988,0.6875526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8737438,0.015193665,0.07247661,0.011565737,0.0019735966,0.0006314125,0.00012789675,0.00019392782,0.02409328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93667966,0.03295237,0.0037810083,0.004145983,0.019603826,0.0028370845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9279682,0.04923648,0.0038668818,0.0071922597,0.009877289,0.0018588464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0323964,0.0006751209,0.0013420008,0.007337466,0.006587347,0.0302956,0.0030061458,0.00860719,0.003499487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03943578,0.0011322141,0.0015226738,0.004333987,0.07283628,0.026658336,0.009904047,0.015305873,0.0006688107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015261736,0.000004888406,0.000074865115,0.00001917354,0.0000018743866,0.000011461671,0.0010703274,0.000083614505,0.000008174291,0.9954567,0.00032407508,0.0029433316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048278785,0.000010019866,0.00034539803,0.00031121523,0.0000061841556,0.000060828268,0.0014862746,0.0007230642,0.0000652978,0.9592731,0.037695896,0.000017855155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013392213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011385622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0323964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017591134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02174051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17133051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254591541","doi":"","title":"Cultural Projects and Structural Transformation in the Legal Profession","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Legal profession; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.034861002479335775,"score_gpt":0.3579469221606429,"score_spread":0.3230859196813071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254591541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50988436,0.0030906645,0.004491494,0.025092794,0.00016914033,0.000051835897,0.00001719725,0.000035654877,0.4571668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942491,0.00029489314,0.00022397371,0.00025816364,0.0000289434,0.000008462882,0.0000027191609,0.000009500566,0.004924152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934743,0.004152074,0.00011363199,0.00047379592,0.00082900876,0.00095717894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949833,0.0021377807,0.0005959924,0.00038447863,0.00055739394,0.0013410641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048459456,0.00017897454,0.00020356008,0.002370449,0.020190554,0.0091852145,0.0010005407,0.0015243283,0.0073436713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078930855,0.0002915326,0.00015906138,0.0017689636,0.07643336,0.005387592,0.01147429,0.0036349692,0.00042468336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014831251,0.00003265529,0.0017307001,0.0000266418,0.0000031884763,0.00026179838,0.25462645,0.00016705728,0.00016778056,0.73064953,0.0006598573,0.011659464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003688317,0.00012236933,0.009480627,0.00024401656,0.000007725406,0.0005475953,0.39692825,0.0007361209,0.0004941375,0.3561908,0.23517084,0.000040572693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015171276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022642508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020190554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009606512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009664031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06970042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254725190","doi":"10.14288/1.0064477","title":"Ethical issues and codes of ethics : views of adult education practitioners in British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical code; Information ethics; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Engineering","score_opus":0.02874924684879856,"score_gpt":0.3188645478042763,"score_spread":0.2901153009554778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254725190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982402,0.0019403939,0.000107629865,0.008313582,0.00003117126,0.000041965683,0.000027795058,0.0000070182277,0.0071284133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98707145,0.0024972332,0.00023441699,0.0035585165,0.0000084403755,0.000036259342,0.000025884017,0.000006638873,0.006561162],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99457884,0.0021009848,0.00028452862,0.0002953403,0.0014561759,0.0012840858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780979,0.0073999343,0.0018944102,0.00026558462,0.006175796,0.00616638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051281084,0.00024039771,0.00046860587,0.0015172347,0.018218523,0.0057808715,0.0013254661,0.0025306044,0.0025796192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012761902,0.0005014091,0.00017160966,0.002793339,0.005593995,0.0013809601,0.0034771184,0.003588873,0.00026261964],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077203826,0.0001305,0.081440546,0.00023951498,0.000011502443,0.0025970112,0.87881786,0.00008617228,0.0016768356,0.0014488059,0.0058863196,0.027587762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004780684,0.000043959415,0.037252422,0.00027942506,0.0000054309326,0.00034851406,0.945608,0.00010235639,0.00008849578,0.00015718305,0.016081313,0.000028105223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89647627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9491287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10352373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03322032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049373586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24103141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255536214","doi":"","title":"How Do You Trim the Seamless Web? Considering the Unintended Consequences of Pedagogical Alterations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Socratic method; Perspective (graphical); Demise; Epistemology; Foundation (evidence); Unintended consequences; Value (mathematics); Bridge (graph theory); Legal education; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.1250992046409846,"score_gpt":0.3892139588782486,"score_spread":0.26411475423726405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255536214","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12124385,0.007507161,0.046545554,0.5527959,0.004038294,0.000069618516,0.00010301586,0.0007166813,0.26697993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93294793,0.0031525628,0.011733635,0.022959424,0.0009615035,0.00006125251,0.00004580279,0.000333152,0.027804825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941993,0.0031568955,0.00016016411,0.00052679295,0.0011505826,0.00080637605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869878,0.006265717,0.0011814414,0.0025498893,0.0018564909,0.0011586698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081342785,0.00026115397,0.00027016317,0.0012266834,0.0069294646,0.015370082,0.001920406,0.00741254,0.008929013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037840884,0.0002679494,0.00037747432,0.0013059443,0.012779102,0.034124777,0.0059035784,0.0059970827,0.0016812787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006902828,0.00008880625,0.0044504493,0.000118125296,0.000024733525,0.0016610532,0.024349801,0.00097304553,0.00069586496,0.7789408,0.05772278,0.13090554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022863778,0.000057402187,0.0026661474,0.00033309794,0.000029892597,0.0011727866,0.045216624,0.0028801817,0.0013582226,0.54922634,0.39698336,0.00005302282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038839006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00553935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015370082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021487642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027125385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0430187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255701417","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195385717.003.0012","title":"Who Do You Think You Are? When Should the Law Let You Be Who You Want to Be?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; State (computer science); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.10970370549240684,"score_gpt":0.36664935485755623,"score_spread":0.2569456493651494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255701417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030895413,0.015437711,0.0047357,0.22354215,0.008759291,0.000044384124,0.00016353354,0.00015876643,0.74406886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06157099,0.012282616,0.0024644358,0.04406781,0.0012044423,0.000056262237,0.0001405555,0.00025454492,0.8779583],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992499,0.00024095805,0.000017656483,0.000071734445,0.00028304607,0.00013670791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989773,0.00028426855,0.000051931678,0.00003239349,0.00039383836,0.00026030256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012239184,0.00031022902,0.00025460095,0.00037067148,0.005015969,0.0057594273,0.0005209506,0.0018092506,0.030920107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028641094,0.0001898964,0.00018286862,0.0003972222,0.004478533,0.0057757455,0.0012589032,0.0073460904,0.015568029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042020174,0.000015678217,0.00031165293,0.000054550306,0.0000018855272,0.00008259473,0.01458748,0.000017651415,0.000117415184,0.10407158,0.8447355,0.03599989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012799181,0.000005290239,0.00035705697,0.0002547347,0.0000018411778,0.000101362326,0.01190257,0.00003801388,0.00009275116,0.011262293,0.9759763,0.0000065261106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032990944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06503119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032990944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036104475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004928316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10343808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255827228","doi":"10.5623/cig2012-008","title":"Survey Law Education Through Distance Learning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Distance education; Presentation (obstetrics); Professional development; Legal education; Public relations; Obligation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine","score_opus":0.07070038039987028,"score_gpt":0.4153305149780924,"score_spread":0.3446301345782221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255827228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658658,0.00020700105,0.006151844,0.0005614548,0.000027205711,0.0006167233,0.009036487,0.00014806952,0.017385425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707743,0.00032863676,0.0060566408,0.0002682096,0.00006525442,0.0010406333,0.009595631,0.000023637755,0.011847023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570835,0.0018748472,0.0003908775,0.00051346124,0.0010331627,0.00047926855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976118,0.0106142275,0.0042002527,0.0026865625,0.0040846746,0.0022963264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026111195,0.00028808165,0.00028502484,0.0057892716,0.0005274744,0.0008467202,0.0008414019,0.0007736525,0.015054601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016777912,0.0003009955,0.00037017657,0.007255263,0.00032906953,0.0017456274,0.0013727791,0.00073535345,0.0072963033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001473769,0.0017194035,0.84601915,0.00016794285,0.00006743045,0.000042509644,0.0013464841,0.0010520396,0.0012775931,0.0014493845,0.009399668,0.13731109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005904701,0.0011078593,0.9648815,0.000058969865,0.000036362544,0.0000803384,0.0043662116,0.0037337,0.0022071858,0.0013530067,0.022096673,0.000019095241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011470846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01640638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015054601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014179392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021998973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050362706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256341160","doi":"","title":"Lawyers as Gatekeepers, Investors and Advisors: An Analysis of Innovation in Legal Fee Arrangements (and Implications for the Lawyer-Client Relationship and the Public Interest)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Club deal; Business; Private equity firm; Equity (law); Private equity fund; Private investment in public equity; Equity theory; Gatekeeping; Public interest; Equity risk; Common law; Finance; Private equity; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06695489875305932,"score_gpt":0.3829592288317536,"score_spread":0.3160043300786943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256341160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66222036,0.0030266307,0.01490886,0.02660952,0.00009405156,0.00029785122,0.000040412207,0.00005052735,0.2927519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99230266,0.00054060534,0.0009107256,0.0005038059,0.00004120818,0.000077417644,0.0000074698933,0.000005450834,0.0056106793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883612,0.0059154797,0.00024023346,0.000578159,0.0017940602,0.003110891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981458,0.0126592275,0.0026150018,0.00038556618,0.00091428857,0.0019678434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005064372,0.00014995846,0.00032493114,0.0023776079,0.0064356388,0.0101621,0.001432654,0.0042338083,0.0059309457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017893054,0.00026391508,0.0004888687,0.0023760488,0.015872257,0.007968129,0.0039995885,0.0024477886,0.00037119995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025741318,0.00017045131,0.0065369993,0.00002735825,0.0000044680623,0.00030407074,0.011263721,0.0010176031,0.00011009289,0.9596533,0.0013210926,0.019565081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018589389,0.0006380254,0.057676893,0.000794721,0.00008863416,0.001237949,0.122936055,0.029460708,0.00097585254,0.6137748,0.17207249,0.00015804771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016244555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013338188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025129505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025129505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011003873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18232816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256453411","doi":"","title":"The Principles and Practices of Aboriginal Equity Programs in Canadian Law Schools: A Comparative Study of the Saskatchewan College of Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Political science; Law; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.07949494560792002,"score_gpt":0.43674367797811825,"score_spread":0.3572487323701982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256453411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678495,0.0008847724,0.00021392836,0.0048262198,0.000031102998,0.00013172519,0.00012323949,0.000011658007,0.025927868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934661,0.00083209726,0.00028885837,0.00077448535,0.0000035140363,0.0000721604,0.00006798427,0.0000113181395,0.004483416],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912929,0.0022742313,0.00026921878,0.0006757138,0.0021848243,0.0033031227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990831,0.00219658,0.00073121773,0.00038167412,0.0030642154,0.0027952692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055660596,0.00044355934,0.00067379675,0.0044929124,0.053268023,0.007823743,0.0031654674,0.0019353402,0.0050557484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010026592,0.0007932369,0.00044159693,0.009997016,0.014169748,0.003038251,0.008165558,0.004128604,0.0003047539],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007980519,0.00022726189,0.062066022,0.0002018079,0.00004714303,0.0009962169,0.8772397,0.00025817927,0.001098115,0.023902712,0.0041999994,0.029682985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012075141,0.000055166707,0.08611638,0.00017586903,0.0000269796,0.000113805974,0.89011437,0.00016820958,0.00017003177,0.00070308644,0.022280324,0.00006373759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99867284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82369304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17630695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25159615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9553672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257108286","doi":"","title":"Didaktische Zugänge zur Rechtslehre in Nordamerika (Law Teaching and Legal Education Discourse in the USA and Canada)","year":2011,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; German; Scholarship; Excellence; Discipline; Law; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Object (grammar); Political science; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02410073950057298,"score_gpt":0.3309596738199862,"score_spread":0.30685893431941325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257108286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4638725,0.03372707,0.000828416,0.1289064,0.0012372214,0.000041019444,0.00023968032,0.000071922055,0.37107575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97574615,0.004586234,0.00023900843,0.004981354,0.000047748283,0.000012390202,0.000031477393,0.000018297322,0.01433732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964296,0.0007976283,0.00007522441,0.0003601527,0.0008913985,0.0014460218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99599093,0.0015637269,0.0002898519,0.00007211676,0.0011791593,0.00090430485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029487608,0.00033583082,0.00041829655,0.0026228877,0.03372838,0.013825844,0.0012172364,0.004209121,0.0035099555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050884257,0.00028123203,0.00020178956,0.005469394,0.018089656,0.002374965,0.003293172,0.0046820315,0.00020268119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000390975,0.00005387218,0.004115741,0.00015526873,0.000012161437,0.0008831503,0.44308478,0.00035620906,0.00043686744,0.4948222,0.030363392,0.025677327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013583408,0.000020764892,0.013872,0.00077248336,0.000028078719,0.00025807822,0.4308117,0.0003858779,0.00041102708,0.011586943,0.5417418,0.00009766269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98210746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11867022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11867022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12741448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86101675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257582217","doi":"","title":"Spaces and Challenges: Feminism in Legal Academia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Legal education; Gender studies; Economic Justice; Political science; Women's history; Sociology; Law; Empowerment; Affirmative action; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.2464361124416393,"score_gpt":0.3942612252996772,"score_spread":0.14782511285803793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257582217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06123225,0.047081586,0.004678818,0.42019764,0.0023664865,0.00003347867,0.000029727855,0.00006507934,0.46431494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9264779,0.011267247,0.0010404775,0.01831596,0.0013726951,0.00006122861,0.000014098397,0.00006094374,0.04138953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823099,0.013658728,0.00015156108,0.0007191729,0.001439533,0.0017212284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898491,0.0071918126,0.00061026425,0.0003299081,0.00059377967,0.0014250547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0111623565,0.00052739517,0.0005421183,0.001868439,0.036497455,0.020942232,0.0020154659,0.0063104015,0.0059069428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007326637,0.00035912293,0.00036812612,0.0019083885,0.1173619,0.014847625,0.015585183,0.00792949,0.0006927823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007941022,0.000021893728,0.000469138,0.000064036656,0.0000020430398,0.00031129623,0.25486788,0.00008015025,0.000096402444,0.7221484,0.008088573,0.01384229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087926455,0.000026353786,0.00068082626,0.0004098445,0.0000029422729,0.00032564753,0.42284736,0.00012254066,0.00012288964,0.14793542,0.42749837,0.000018955943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03854552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07399413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03854552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020073459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021448664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14564383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257729547","doi":"","title":"Book Review of Richard K. Sherwin, When Law Goes Pop","year":2006,"lang":"lt","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Postmodernism; Skepticism; Criminal law; Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01403097763700005,"score_gpt":0.322241075731255,"score_spread":0.3082100980942549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257729547","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005972902,0.6292954,0.0015530289,0.10722467,0.052277546,0.00004345026,0.00039170633,0.00013485263,0.20848204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0064581945,0.35324103,0.0010418054,0.039553296,0.017634755,0.0000648068,0.00054490654,0.00022757062,0.58123374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994516,0.00008106441,0.000028316976,0.000069850445,0.00033696694,0.000032196647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849856,0.00062130316,0.00007933636,0.000038194983,0.00064380374,0.000118716496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050448213,0.0006554314,0.00074091717,0.0019372,0.0011053828,0.0027076786,0.0008530485,0.0012084668,0.033851434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003550332,0.0002971973,0.00026365023,0.0028013627,0.0011213623,0.0033234244,0.00073406834,0.002969156,0.020810787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028155107,0.000003931467,0.000019685665,0.00010763204,0.0000012958584,0.000015383761,0.000055003427,0.000031301268,0.000033952037,0.003923261,0.97103006,0.02477576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011205652,0.0000027361623,0.00011506877,0.00019449352,0.0000013148323,0.000043340006,0.00004839614,0.000013682521,0.000018624187,0.0010831573,0.9984754,0.0000025482832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010599078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02473343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033851434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021604162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028939352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113244355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258055179","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000237x","title":"Should Any Court Accept the “Social Authority” Paradigm?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Resolution (logic); Law; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Computer security","score_opus":0.1076789380825444,"score_gpt":0.4200297274548881,"score_spread":0.3123507893723437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258055179","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068248124,0.0014573762,0.015884634,0.8301145,0.0021455162,0.00008586584,0.00005005712,0.000074828116,0.14336249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52033955,0.0018875881,0.00878622,0.42495924,0.007823372,0.0004548649,0.00008284432,0.00013211255,0.035534147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96308476,0.013032088,0.0014657478,0.0044698543,0.01271798,0.005229633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675088,0.0171151,0.001901538,0.0025406422,0.008384568,0.0025492767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04079913,0.0005661678,0.0012429008,0.0022134464,0.014718493,0.018204937,0.00570906,0.040424522,0.0075755375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08828955,0.0004977949,0.0015886887,0.0018371415,0.04639913,0.021485494,0.008252649,0.027737517,0.002459083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061170267,0.0000128340425,0.00020978908,0.00001614437,0.0000066053717,0.0000641272,0.0009090229,0.000114809,0.000039418657,0.9817253,0.013498329,0.0033974655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038543203,0.000018445902,0.00024364793,0.00009461245,0.000009111515,0.000047619702,0.0010402269,0.00043093762,0.000085629996,0.9256208,0.0723463,0.00002409928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026354214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025450382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04079913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010246547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022001227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.215769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258489002","doi":"","title":"Beyond \"Thinking Like a Lawyer\" and the Traditional Legal Paradigm: Toward a Comprehensive View of Legal Education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Engineering ethics; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Legal formalism; Legal profession; Legal research; Political science; Legal ethics; Legal writing; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Black letter law; Engineering; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03490787322344787,"score_gpt":0.2702237689408482,"score_spread":0.23531589571740033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258489002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024675535,0.018958636,0.099980414,0.39592114,0.001104747,0.00009526298,0.00010526795,0.0001558339,0.45900324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9082935,0.008410027,0.024802946,0.032407973,0.0011395572,0.00025264922,0.00006127812,0.000114909395,0.024517305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411315,0.0037868286,0.00014212794,0.00047300113,0.0009921927,0.0004927511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938153,0.0034910138,0.0004525955,0.00043442307,0.0008817322,0.00092491944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068430323,0.00069408154,0.0008384275,0.003713013,0.008154451,0.020259354,0.002704944,0.009096971,0.004008743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005426091,0.00043988213,0.0005107956,0.0028038013,0.07920949,0.018299777,0.0056965975,0.014008566,0.00044854943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012812354,0.0000109211,0.00006977599,0.000017721066,0.000001368274,0.00000777481,0.0027442477,0.00010869081,0.00001756201,0.99404436,0.0010251894,0.0019511232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047975573,0.0000069233947,0.0001841532,0.000097513665,0.0000040547316,0.00002027364,0.0033360613,0.00056756864,0.00003856242,0.97307545,0.022658493,0.000006076224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028885484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045380887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028885484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012935818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027503705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093856335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258736271","doi":"","title":"Transsystemia - Are We Approaching a New Langdellian Moment - Is McGill Leading the Way","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Common law; Jurisdiction; Commercial law; Legal history; Sociology","score_opus":0.10412803839665143,"score_gpt":0.3977357728599319,"score_spread":0.2936077344632805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258736271","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028007831,0.022820765,0.005085387,0.65796375,0.0025509552,0.00004201408,0.000078993595,0.00016597458,0.2832843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62238497,0.012854168,0.003948961,0.15408239,0.0011239247,0.00008017412,0.00007449639,0.00010575236,0.20534514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960096,0.0013853188,0.00006601112,0.0005370212,0.0010109516,0.0009911649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962949,0.00066324516,0.0003334343,0.00027855943,0.0007829936,0.0016468811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028258746,0.00019991395,0.00021783232,0.00067666656,0.0038076579,0.0083195865,0.0008788749,0.0030108974,0.012385231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00525469,0.0001616663,0.00023730243,0.00061734713,0.00973484,0.0069610756,0.0034091123,0.0038045307,0.0012802845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031682248,0.000050868184,0.0032402745,0.00014043896,0.000011606674,0.00012830723,0.004990491,0.00009661411,0.0007121243,0.7429368,0.14640489,0.10125589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105754325,0.00008056632,0.004317512,0.00018852144,0.000010676128,0.000102802274,0.0044220234,0.00013788579,0.000426282,0.043415718,0.94686675,0.000020687927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091751255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22379556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9872485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012751536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023711212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18243438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258869515","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of Lawyers’ Roles in Mandatory Mediation: A Condition of Systemic Transformation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; Law; Alternative dispute resolution; Sociology","score_opus":0.008107850712365708,"score_gpt":0.3094558521701075,"score_spread":0.3013480014577418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258869515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97011954,0.00014703887,0.0010457139,0.0069953185,0.000022133216,0.000083130144,0.000026678917,0.000035918285,0.021524651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808455,0.00002919958,0.00023023084,0.00027941773,0.000002902723,0.000014542628,0.000008731799,0.0000043344135,0.0013462104],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97439665,0.013890712,0.00068809895,0.0017894884,0.0048004054,0.004434639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.940648,0.030204035,0.008156381,0.0031067636,0.010932299,0.0069524823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021420103,0.00015556958,0.0003608502,0.0010031086,0.0100559285,0.008783392,0.0018100999,0.0020463772,0.0031738502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057549503,0.0004819085,0.00020805959,0.0018839588,0.011083088,0.004324538,0.007743686,0.0035141073,0.00029297173],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004565741,0.0011174451,0.20461188,0.00019286858,0.00004910835,0.002205282,0.59768313,0.0010394686,0.006360149,0.041138016,0.0040645683,0.14108157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013524387,0.0005366279,0.38971582,0.00018079086,0.000031294436,0.0004410507,0.56474745,0.0013039393,0.002662329,0.010442854,0.029689617,0.0001129855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.120116256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27937394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120116256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024348687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042074177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2388342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259290332","doi":"","title":"First Principles: The Melbourne Law School 1857-2007","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Privilege (computing); Legal education; Political science; Jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Curriculum; Legal history; Common law; Corporate governance; Sociology; Management","score_opus":0.04001530267842498,"score_gpt":0.3328350652182197,"score_spread":0.29281976253979475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259290332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02745703,0.021061264,0.00068826624,0.04872753,0.0034708814,0.00018670266,0.0012740062,0.00017590048,0.8969583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057878233,0.002537078,0.00038444862,0.0032297266,0.00035232992,0.000047322566,0.00025411518,0.000090141286,0.93522656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882704,0.000113647206,0.0000261329,0.00016885395,0.0004892189,0.00037517105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990107,0.000058485442,0.000066856446,0.00003865714,0.00025397795,0.0005712619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087954046,0.0003492198,0.00025351797,0.0014266437,0.00976334,0.0052560386,0.0010891665,0.002125483,0.048057802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022284691,0.00062066095,0.00019981332,0.0013189417,0.002527513,0.0029667586,0.0031364472,0.00514266,0.009538964],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024459385,0.00009230029,0.0017016222,0.00021188121,0.00000457296,0.00033344084,0.022146972,0.000108323235,0.0004906365,0.20058656,0.6941302,0.080168955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013691313,0.000008229482,0.004023518,0.00007268871,8.988552e-7,0.000042304357,0.0010923551,0.000017946359,0.000057086898,0.0013488461,0.99333054,0.0000043124064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25819233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6020093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25819233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024468098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018391378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.513379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259381135","doi":"10.18438/b8p32r","title":"Evidence and Ethics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.10008667649907783,"score_gpt":0.39906517976796296,"score_spread":0.29897850326888514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259381135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085436896,0.21652061,0.0075687054,0.27880228,0.17755719,0.0027701021,0.004635565,0.00024182133,0.31104937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.064049125,0.32285205,0.01914975,0.26432487,0.07417267,0.013019189,0.0066542937,0.00047873505,0.23529932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9336823,0.031414915,0.011956523,0.0030581302,0.018351624,0.0015365031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83360475,0.07622949,0.009341433,0.019551523,0.056283373,0.0049895192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03504051,0.0012832707,0.0033847499,0.006550911,0.0030130523,0.007806993,0.0044146064,0.01586636,0.08823331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26548865,0.0010999821,0.0024081464,0.0055069546,0.004595872,0.0066127237,0.004123054,0.014509088,0.039787993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005055735,0.0001073658,0.0005015741,0.029832732,0.0003263223,0.0004463265,0.0003279654,0.0001578839,0.00034281058,0.076567955,0.67001873,0.22086476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010310831,0.00007224177,0.0004524007,0.057844806,0.00028021887,0.00044872562,0.00028609336,0.00009159341,0.00039822937,0.034880925,0.90511054,0.000031022948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023200975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028159022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08823331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062989215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01739894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29516983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259984825","doi":"","title":"The Role of the Independent Lawyer and Security Certificates","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislation; Parliament; Economic Justice; Certificate; Confidentiality; Political science; Clearance; Adversarial system; Business; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.01598115932216011,"score_gpt":0.29792367756367066,"score_spread":0.28194251824151056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259984825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15061805,0.0040737246,0.028991163,0.08069134,0.0023011782,0.0003568391,0.00006870697,0.00042246323,0.7324766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74408823,0.0014474919,0.008784499,0.010578963,0.0007700511,0.00013199424,0.000035373567,0.0001018156,0.23406166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99076277,0.004249156,0.00032795582,0.0011122803,0.0015243838,0.0020234226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830072,0.006393941,0.0016427069,0.0013133961,0.0012308564,0.006411873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007872144,0.0002960717,0.00044395,0.0013839923,0.0096315285,0.01099478,0.001957289,0.005210851,0.029171431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018047994,0.0005554598,0.00037544937,0.0006193949,0.012248456,0.0050978637,0.008627816,0.0070360037,0.004434683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014502791,0.0006568115,0.012190245,0.00018719814,0.000029452745,0.0028377506,0.018828955,0.0004359242,0.00232292,0.73066366,0.05806934,0.17363271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013832272,0.00083686056,0.012558326,0.0012553937,0.00007520935,0.008123191,0.030350875,0.0015048183,0.002790075,0.09149437,0.8507169,0.00015572167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004556849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008337959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029171431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032853181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022215059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09758818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260663150","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1170","title":"Book Notes: How Judges Think, by Richard A. Posner","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.029579193556591003,"score_gpt":0.33830637234663813,"score_spread":0.30872717879004713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260663150","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078919064,0.03421955,0.0022349614,0.7955523,0.011391499,0.000017379862,0.00017992858,0.000080187274,0.15553501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040806502,0.03863339,0.0037346326,0.34552327,0.012685156,0.00011153509,0.0002567406,0.0003957101,0.557853],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845016,0.00056570355,0.00006689188,0.00020289957,0.0005954724,0.00011881234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956589,0.002875909,0.0001233071,0.00015476032,0.00094282755,0.00024440713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002738925,0.00042204175,0.00034484564,0.0011659452,0.005667591,0.0069574015,0.0010315336,0.0052865422,0.022257797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012817617,0.0004646398,0.0003032994,0.0014679861,0.007856312,0.011271498,0.0013158728,0.009629573,0.009099609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037823318,0.000004885542,0.00007903475,0.000016554914,9.267624e-7,0.000024895015,0.00047493336,0.00002971969,0.000024645866,0.050389703,0.94070995,0.0082408935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004871867,0.000005475864,0.00033666962,0.00024471185,0.0000028999893,0.000064541484,0.0024168023,0.00008066847,0.00009956943,0.078487255,0.91824126,0.000015086046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020920416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06628303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022257797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027861902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003818506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07445979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260844422","doi":"","title":"Library guides: Law: Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.029835958316949355,"score_gpt":0.3396633144199048,"score_spread":0.3098273561029555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260844422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025370917,0.0029721581,0.00068605196,0.007593889,0.0005320935,0.0003189498,0.0336538,0.0019747447,0.9497312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022745053,0.00072111393,0.00039106116,0.00047125138,0.000022381046,0.000036030327,0.0020575877,0.00021689401,0.99380916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987097,0.00006095622,0.00005968232,0.000099024684,0.0008218318,0.00024890507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993178,0.0006898716,0.00014306985,0.00020843538,0.0048108813,0.00096978835],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011099238,0.00088634016,0.00086590875,0.0039014048,0.010327772,0.009615167,0.0020522675,0.0040200776,0.42626652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064428803,0.0011182517,0.0004538776,0.010615236,0.0017253156,0.0024671096,0.0015443763,0.002372122,0.11747047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010485586,0.000024797366,0.0003444706,0.00007891529,0.0000014167603,0.000031529453,0.00019625324,0.00011565698,0.00003884582,0.003942709,0.9690637,0.026151152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010031886,0.0000049505293,0.0023628923,0.00010835935,0.0000032342568,0.000016206113,0.0004515589,0.00013978373,0.00010207942,0.0005316038,0.99625236,0.00001699843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9793276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99455595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050296865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16586141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81836116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261801851","doi":"10.53300/001c.6190","title":"Why Teach Alternative Dispute Resolution to Law Students? Part One: Past and Current Practices and Some Unanswered Questions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"La Trobe University","keywords":"Australian Curriculum; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Interactivity; Sociology; Literacy; Media literacy; Critical literacy; Perspective (graphical); Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Project commissioning; Political science; Law; Psychology; Publishing; Multimedia; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0538816666642192,"score_gpt":0.4521367093881303,"score_spread":0.3982550427239111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261801851","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10381553,0.25304788,0.00996944,0.5730376,0.0019227972,0.00020372304,0.000060814582,0.000088679924,0.05785351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7218033,0.1969027,0.022027215,0.037964918,0.0012486851,0.0003759915,0.00008034423,0.000079225974,0.01951766],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98288476,0.011658027,0.00073094707,0.0014368865,0.0027380744,0.0005513428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9524515,0.03478862,0.0032709497,0.0015018692,0.0052925926,0.0026944552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020235334,0.00024881418,0.00075666426,0.0016203916,0.0036972382,0.00868815,0.002937191,0.0052729966,0.0046005254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040207,0.00036779285,0.00037629105,0.003040605,0.010973914,0.009938282,0.003789682,0.00575904,0.0010437524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044542157,0.00080690003,0.005951374,0.0034483976,0.000027927066,0.00039009837,0.076492295,0.0002459503,0.00054774754,0.08195065,0.032329492,0.79776466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102130565,0.00032412916,0.010252722,0.008906462,0.000028433049,0.0012100376,0.19475034,0.0009544628,0.0014584513,0.09493852,0.6869945,0.00007984641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047943844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00947318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020235334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005680674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010368876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10701591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262337073","doi":"","title":"The Use of Academic Writing in Appellate Judicial Decision-Making","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Realm; Precedent; General partnership; Law of the case; Common law; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.03535756109489537,"score_gpt":0.39205727080439784,"score_spread":0.3566997097095025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262337073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07403179,0.02133613,0.015327749,0.08107723,0.0017796471,0.00018100848,0.00013462472,0.00013822739,0.8059936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95649874,0.006754273,0.0074104955,0.006609619,0.00086669653,0.00006554937,0.00006038904,0.000086980115,0.021647101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91187996,0.04265868,0.0034828412,0.0025974424,0.032644477,0.006736553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77843356,0.14237273,0.0115555655,0.011642499,0.04826593,0.0077296514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055061452,0.00057683274,0.0004866208,0.010657357,0.024000473,0.025163502,0.004241422,0.0038092646,0.004101937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1642392,0.00049025484,0.00042336807,0.013475,0.045734487,0.0050508385,0.009022142,0.0057908697,0.00074118795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036774487,0.000052835003,0.005514774,0.00040241642,0.00003034296,0.0005788143,0.15108152,0.0005820667,0.00052869105,0.6206966,0.029821802,0.19067329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036965434,0.000065281754,0.012422391,0.0024422666,0.00007156867,0.00073443947,0.09263675,0.0012691512,0.0018099553,0.10996659,0.7783531,0.00019148875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.413098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57280236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.413098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038293153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08438425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82138705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262479844","doi":"","title":"Confidentiality, Human Relationship, and Law Reform","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Mandate; Commission; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Human rights; Law reform; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.036906036011336296,"score_gpt":0.37900141807996296,"score_spread":0.34209538206862666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262479844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029677916,0.046904676,0.006049915,0.42614564,0.0012246441,0.000102277816,0.000030079946,0.000023485432,0.48984137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89107496,0.02100824,0.0018811837,0.045158036,0.0012898528,0.00017436998,0.00001961146,0.000016229347,0.03937753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98734295,0.007838492,0.00023858823,0.0005599191,0.0019036604,0.0021163838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931537,0.0048134504,0.00057641225,0.00032284897,0.0005634399,0.00057019043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010245251,0.00022831981,0.00042612132,0.0011335933,0.010918495,0.010382821,0.0014116109,0.009073703,0.00456148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013356016,0.00022137944,0.0004126901,0.001881311,0.045114998,0.008389037,0.0054477034,0.0073168636,0.00030938693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016954145,0.000007832418,0.000089384084,0.0000144854985,8.375065e-7,0.000031943302,0.0025760743,0.0000692197,0.000009299719,0.99320555,0.0022739077,0.001719793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017756365,0.00004818163,0.0012102913,0.0006379113,0.000009091684,0.00017045451,0.017184878,0.00045290755,0.00021479151,0.7202414,0.2597876,0.000024718564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061898563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044268895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061898563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025344158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027211819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18388557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263174178","doi":"","title":"Not a Box But a Window: Law Libraries and Legal Education in a Virtual World","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Window (computing); Space (punctuation); Legal education; Space law; Law; Law library; Political science; Degree (music); Library science; Engineering; Computer science; Outer space; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.015527317846836143,"score_gpt":0.3219064605408305,"score_spread":0.30637914269399436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263174178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05557827,0.0697221,0.002257247,0.36622176,0.0027808757,0.000048038226,0.00012505666,0.00012931206,0.50313735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67506695,0.04667476,0.0013785542,0.017785845,0.0013319732,0.000059938764,0.00011069336,0.00010135702,0.2574899],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988286,0.0006498772,0.000018143377,0.000048679747,0.00018782675,0.0002669521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997903,0.0010166529,0.00017701506,0.00005363102,0.00014362647,0.0007060764],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011844768,0.00019572022,0.00018040396,0.0006127473,0.007256427,0.011419535,0.0007415232,0.0033427542,0.016335562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029880719,0.0002376192,0.00017265337,0.0020721161,0.007970998,0.011445697,0.0034605332,0.0023430276,0.00096633995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007657472,0.00013990322,0.0025135817,0.00040073638,0.000010959812,0.00071614527,0.091526836,0.00037990598,0.00015826087,0.31847006,0.502095,0.083512045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028959654,0.00006926049,0.008686222,0.00064602564,0.000025852163,0.00042175018,0.15732685,0.0003619468,0.00014623275,0.03983257,0.7924234,0.00003097367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12598975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3651382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98858047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010105625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009963612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25051278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263291795","doi":"","title":"Reform of the Australian Broadcasting Authority's Enforcement Powers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Sanctions; Broadcasting (networking); Business; Law and economics; Law; Computer security; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.021722011010470242,"score_gpt":0.33757894586717435,"score_spread":0.31585693485670413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263291795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086208895,0.003541811,0.01814604,0.051701225,0.0013880801,0.00065356685,0.00035286788,0.0002896832,0.8377177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72995824,0.002581916,0.0103962105,0.010973703,0.0009883309,0.00046218577,0.00015190813,0.000108673856,0.24437878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9644421,0.0054843817,0.0021609974,0.0028786315,0.021941796,0.00309223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96306545,0.008946898,0.0017161398,0.0032433863,0.02136122,0.0016669716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024945972,0.00048945454,0.0005378851,0.005577444,0.009431425,0.012412867,0.0041936147,0.0042807893,0.01333034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048182607,0.0016703067,0.0011524084,0.0031099515,0.009410424,0.005966595,0.0049924897,0.0066496274,0.0018078871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024974797,0.00007229634,0.0028932316,0.00017193377,0.00003222254,0.00047149297,0.006780514,0.001281801,0.0008826947,0.93861216,0.018518835,0.03025787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014225922,0.00019626363,0.029301345,0.0009750074,0.00020014717,0.0007481961,0.0046582636,0.0131922085,0.0016893485,0.115096584,0.8335544,0.00024602446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32028243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24912809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32028243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02488897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048596658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63683635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263546145","doi":"","title":"Mandatory Legal Education is a Step in the Right Direction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law; Continuing education; History","score_opus":0.015868998204993077,"score_gpt":0.3349608280330446,"score_spread":0.3190918298280515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263546145","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031526214,0.002081016,0.0032774012,0.950305,0.0062813084,0.00004586394,0.00009176773,0.0001996958,0.034565322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12203776,0.0032235638,0.01724854,0.7932721,0.00474224,0.00018816908,0.00034475056,0.00029886593,0.05864405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.972934,0.0069109877,0.0014474257,0.0028572371,0.011050785,0.0047994433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9208178,0.01912164,0.0044812784,0.005960713,0.020701364,0.028917242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026553225,0.000650632,0.00088391086,0.0013261441,0.0097846845,0.01044557,0.00308045,0.013243145,0.029417502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07233057,0.00076483696,0.00083276955,0.0008101098,0.012666225,0.01518293,0.011903059,0.023263123,0.00774333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007936464,0.00034555138,0.0044345246,0.000624409,0.000057002035,0.00025833625,0.0036552835,0.00023439077,0.0011337274,0.2656109,0.5834324,0.14013414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006734812,0.00015201005,0.009126341,0.0017717707,0.000027906992,0.0002465821,0.0033723393,0.00018856606,0.00071587716,0.05609354,0.9281349,0.0001027569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052944474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09713256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052944474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067042857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05244241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14042854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264396694","doi":"","title":"Accessing Quality?: Legal Education and the Diversity Challenge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Diversity (politics); Framing (construction); Political science; Population; Legal education; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Ethnic group; Call to action; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Epistemology; Marketing","score_opus":0.046537775571030664,"score_gpt":0.40051122625457614,"score_spread":0.35397345068354547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264396694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009868535,0.0074537983,0.0011335344,0.9436235,0.00066343165,0.000011537739,0.000038072707,0.000014468723,0.03719309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66481215,0.009216403,0.00193876,0.30513653,0.007411388,0.00008712019,0.000052126386,0.00009512699,0.0112503255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9576581,0.024180058,0.0011749376,0.002960759,0.008537992,0.0054881293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9233314,0.050845712,0.004545153,0.0023445638,0.0048570577,0.014076199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026690733,0.00033675611,0.0012753542,0.002324038,0.017145399,0.03204191,0.003428258,0.020567272,0.012652034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05796547,0.00042873042,0.00082827726,0.0035321938,0.057185974,0.03727189,0.021887125,0.027831553,0.0010444695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024441148,0.00007163389,0.0024068558,0.00018197959,0.000018390034,0.0002052632,0.013218897,0.00020925458,0.0000848117,0.9338618,0.025612283,0.024104416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005161183,0.000072300085,0.0038102174,0.0010062016,0.000016082773,0.00030589546,0.025680453,0.00043609977,0.00014346743,0.8193878,0.14902388,0.00006593994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020821653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018424409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03204191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01764528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014390287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14115578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264883797","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Raymond Challinor, a Radical Lawyer in Victorian England: W. P. Roberts and the Struggle for Workers' Rights (London: I. B. Tauris & Co. Ltd., 1990)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Dignity; Politics; Law; Delegate; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.008702989293868157,"score_gpt":0.3220525506868921,"score_spread":0.31334956139302395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264883797","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008722945,0.9592295,0.00009260605,0.019680485,0.010657286,0.000022140028,0.00013102585,0.000019549427,0.010080059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014326302,0.90162015,0.00024360577,0.020064712,0.008716661,0.000060953793,0.00025797365,0.00003910515,0.067564234],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992237,0.00012864602,0.00006959584,0.00012370788,0.0003872966,0.00006707958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757344,0.0012177178,0.00022955444,0.000057580375,0.0006507997,0.00027091155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091682497,0.0017061423,0.0018384972,0.003813994,0.0014103975,0.0040232483,0.002314113,0.0043243677,0.042336613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004079248,0.0006815137,0.0005380295,0.007710361,0.0020221034,0.0048192753,0.0017334422,0.005113739,0.029214919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007671901,0.000007431039,0.00004480341,0.0010175803,0.000004115933,0.00003515533,0.00012851648,0.000022111564,0.00002146788,0.0007765111,0.9590001,0.038934533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061237633,0.000007113737,0.00041888418,0.002231799,0.0000064997416,0.00024159226,0.00014280409,0.000009733142,0.000012187841,0.00055605394,0.99635834,0.0000088284005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026033087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0665437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042336613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039844704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006412607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14163005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265015261","doi":"","title":"What Do Changing Cultures of Dispute Resolution Mean for Legal Education","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Mediation; Political science; Dispute resolution; Law; Legal education; Alternative dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Legal profession; Legal practice; Public relations; Business","score_opus":0.019909569352956336,"score_gpt":0.3766945872902479,"score_spread":0.35678501793729156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265015261","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038321175,0.032125153,0.0037227361,0.82137567,0.0082561085,0.00005962188,0.00011176225,0.000099827776,0.09592785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70310515,0.05752214,0.009516296,0.20404987,0.0036191882,0.00028133884,0.0001497466,0.00027309492,0.021483148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846138,0.008573909,0.0004850743,0.0012666838,0.0024081084,0.0026524574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668045,0.009135816,0.003769964,0.0034353847,0.005550429,0.011303876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017174246,0.0006395494,0.0010047283,0.0019741198,0.012797505,0.035700902,0.0028136992,0.0075393086,0.011875544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031061798,0.00053084263,0.0008178817,0.002033461,0.041163787,0.04751619,0.00997341,0.015564524,0.003913844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120223754,0.00044168375,0.016574698,0.0011642838,0.00009476566,0.00048375977,0.17488259,0.00035365997,0.0005344386,0.52129453,0.0858028,0.19825248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037209014,0.00013619401,0.0093904035,0.004539716,0.00003939797,0.00050438254,0.2478871,0.0002156005,0.0006053301,0.18694699,0.5495169,0.00018080702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011154707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01212066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035700902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0097791655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008971695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09082717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265276945","doi":"","title":"Harry and the Steelworker: Teaching Labor Law to Non-Lawyers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal education; Labour law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014907525971349879,"score_gpt":0.3278016135726089,"score_spread":0.31289408760125903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265276945","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1368243,0.0089404555,0.007699235,0.62815726,0.004851359,0.00012691712,0.000034555644,0.00017758018,0.21318837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6698351,0.0076741097,0.009051707,0.07529954,0.0012202726,0.0002848065,0.000037925813,0.00026339595,0.23633318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538064,0.0031153334,0.000046327554,0.0002931856,0.00053988356,0.0006246692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99120307,0.004871728,0.00033007687,0.00024978034,0.00065770524,0.0026877539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005667806,0.00041469172,0.00035707394,0.0007573294,0.016262045,0.0067281304,0.0014084519,0.0053534713,0.024535792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018041957,0.0005014101,0.00033195264,0.00060956896,0.0074062035,0.0092652375,0.006211524,0.008019805,0.0032033466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013978296,0.0013924078,0.0035126186,0.00022733305,0.000014612842,0.0008548681,0.15896013,0.0002766105,0.00091381016,0.119211175,0.5506873,0.1638093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020850876,0.00039971742,0.0052153147,0.0005620625,0.000038360522,0.0004962523,0.32234207,0.00062049174,0.0014259795,0.13327704,0.53534627,0.00006789168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014523562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045502335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024535792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004892523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014666838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082080424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265984311","doi":"","title":"Gender Equality and Lawyers Work: Education as a Strategy for Change in the Legal Profession?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Political science; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Law; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1266116101943197,"score_gpt":0.47050896067045567,"score_spread":0.34389735047613595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265984311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014700502,0.006661256,0.0019559576,0.9108068,0.0016050168,0.000060360395,0.000008985823,0.000036131598,0.06416489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7091265,0.008247258,0.0036673325,0.22640912,0.0027965177,0.00024580635,0.000024334015,0.00006075135,0.049422413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96606046,0.017992578,0.00041784398,0.0018541822,0.0040098582,0.009665105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97298795,0.010492031,0.0018641971,0.00082738826,0.0020338711,0.011794607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03003142,0.00076446676,0.0007905147,0.0025669264,0.028271064,0.024812326,0.0032498706,0.01975074,0.017266598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033274576,0.00042188042,0.0006605356,0.001981583,0.058548316,0.028302573,0.019696558,0.014436044,0.0021201295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005663211,0.00048601927,0.0036335625,0.00028340184,0.000015063426,0.00037554704,0.1604475,0.00013354832,0.00031553558,0.6214,0.05950229,0.15335093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089666435,0.00027872671,0.005282486,0.0011276817,0.00001574646,0.00020712598,0.25070065,0.00020581596,0.00045778012,0.27154702,0.47002724,0.000060155697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046230055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06018924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046230055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021442205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065367736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15882325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266007141","doi":"","title":"Canada's Courts Online: Privacy, Public Access and Electronic Court Records","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Information privacy; Copying; Privacy policy; Business; Personally identifiable information; Public records; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04069308922580835,"score_gpt":0.34028466217425757,"score_spread":0.29959157294844924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266007141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0997468,0.013532365,0.0015108758,0.26579458,0.0006134777,0.000110420246,0.0025838774,0.000097417185,0.6160102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8603615,0.012672426,0.0011725846,0.019084124,0.0003920973,0.00006215268,0.00068258215,0.000071209564,0.10550133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99314284,0.00096903386,0.00014569225,0.00041818368,0.0033453705,0.001978786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849487,0.006516622,0.0011166757,0.0005799772,0.0039211945,0.0029168606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025298754,0.00032120987,0.0004030773,0.0029374952,0.021880992,0.017632466,0.0022094282,0.0049024643,0.025569746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018240452,0.00042535533,0.00033436433,0.010470444,0.013119221,0.007413593,0.0041857623,0.00438269,0.00091281725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003846335,0.00011481502,0.017584926,0.00013636531,0.000025819007,0.0008537997,0.020799367,0.00075433264,0.0000813285,0.7526538,0.15787967,0.049077287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006475793,0.000040499403,0.08781065,0.0015459335,0.00009637646,0.00044190628,0.07440802,0.0026643293,0.0003318369,0.13436502,0.6979995,0.0002311065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12807432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12807432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22591804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9292486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266719558","doi":"","title":"Proof and Progress: Coping with the Law of Evidence in a Technological Age","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Coping (psychology); Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.07475189726486693,"score_gpt":0.3563132170176619,"score_spread":0.28156131975279497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266719558","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059129326,0.02754312,0.14221321,0.7157922,0.0029142674,0.00017141295,0.000060523183,0.00014585246,0.10524658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58320117,0.031815283,0.21039851,0.13229607,0.015347801,0.0014279381,0.00009214552,0.00031887108,0.025102105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8582379,0.09215648,0.0077852965,0.010023277,0.028023714,0.0037732818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66485405,0.28401,0.009962985,0.02316297,0.01396447,0.004045501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16465889,0.0014477873,0.0021875561,0.0068923268,0.014969322,0.038040694,0.006959629,0.03282012,0.0046242084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2496583,0.0016259584,0.0018489249,0.0031718323,0.15892169,0.07710869,0.020411706,0.037732758,0.0016165491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006505105,0.000008033299,0.00008989565,0.0000675416,0.000006933278,0.00012467761,0.0017186676,0.00019722489,0.000055076194,0.9890581,0.0021050917,0.006562375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016087457,0.000018079627,0.0000554203,0.0003701066,0.0000065307077,0.00014364146,0.0012549816,0.00024811778,0.000097993085,0.95615077,0.041612186,0.000026077205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039568166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003511874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16465889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013544688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023272177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87080985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267117444","doi":"","title":"'Are Law Schools Amoral Boot Camps?': Two Legal Ethicists Beg to Differ with a Controversial Book- Review of Lawyers Gone Bad: Money, Sex and Madness in Canada’s Legal Profession by Philip Slayton","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Macabre; Law; Legal ethics; Political science; Legal profession; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.013109946723821873,"score_gpt":0.3157874134528103,"score_spread":0.30267746672898843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267117444","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014216254,0.4376205,0.00013087442,0.5317186,0.007833565,0.000013377547,0.00007370925,0.000015775233,0.021171907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07438308,0.55503064,0.0005126513,0.3086039,0.010340017,0.00006426964,0.00018827364,0.00008555229,0.050791685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590415,0.0012215629,0.000112521426,0.0002533587,0.0018315705,0.0006767375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885548,0.0047433944,0.00052598136,0.00021083593,0.0045424732,0.0014225381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004813511,0.0004387418,0.00078227645,0.0024071948,0.009660353,0.012391642,0.0019510856,0.006046737,0.0054012155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014824168,0.0004043868,0.00033818878,0.0044272095,0.015853416,0.007396388,0.002367537,0.010418234,0.0011672114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015375754,0.000013455886,0.0005066587,0.0006673855,0.00001161091,0.0000751838,0.00778231,0.000045186942,0.000040823506,0.04178402,0.8743352,0.0747227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010973531,0.000011200641,0.003418693,0.0033853862,0.000017226355,0.00007371648,0.01582628,0.00002334149,0.000047121623,0.0060827765,0.9710786,0.00002476565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63248664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85812193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36751336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03333922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07619666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73935544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267624397","doi":"10.1017/s0012217314000559","title":"Constructivism in EthicsCARLA BAGNOLI, EDITORS Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013; 258 pp.; $95.00 (hardback)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructivism (international relations); Media studies; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025411118235003166,"score_gpt":0.2979189782608258,"score_spread":0.2725078600258226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267624397","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050843233,0.9054479,0.004729757,0.0425923,0.00438634,0.000020521267,0.00015726109,0.00017038587,0.041987162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028766805,0.847418,0.010584654,0.00892461,0.011308299,0.00025812432,0.0004647784,0.0005195828,0.09175513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978671,0.0010591128,0.00015133715,0.00016920597,0.0006418247,0.00011133942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958793,0.002949456,0.00020815291,0.00021959681,0.00053698703,0.00020658012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048178025,0.0016601518,0.0013745079,0.0032515468,0.0013582839,0.00620429,0.0012671744,0.0018965662,0.015463719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056029493,0.0013046775,0.0005994353,0.0030344878,0.0089436,0.00809512,0.0021402277,0.0052926084,0.006549784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047348112,0.00003804687,0.00023484313,0.001181637,0.000025951751,0.000097059594,0.0036120252,0.00043913315,0.00016052616,0.1343869,0.6841721,0.17560449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010265598,0.000009250918,0.000663571,0.0018959501,0.000008765687,0.00014236974,0.0011540954,0.0001815066,0.00009617677,0.091504775,0.9043137,0.000019609668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064036967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014431682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015463719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003958001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004140587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05173129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267645977","doi":"","title":"Ch. 13: Growing Legal Aid Ontario in the Middle Class: A Proposal for Public Legal Expenses","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Legal research; Debtor; Creditor; Middle class; Law; Legal service; Finance; Political science; Debt","score_opus":0.09153201216646628,"score_gpt":0.32662581775626903,"score_spread":0.23509380558980275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267645977","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10223768,0.0024484955,0.007274266,0.46862778,0.005284624,0.008646803,0.004289088,0.0009512146,0.40024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16378088,0.0015772944,0.019452449,0.08229818,0.0013365863,0.003592885,0.0014840199,0.00016202405,0.72631574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968245,0.0002290101,0.000096489,0.00016353148,0.001034459,0.0016520056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937125,0.0004363214,0.00016327722,0.0001480171,0.001190802,0.004349118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034448334,0.00044029538,0.00024243986,0.0010949476,0.0069904,0.0037791997,0.0024997792,0.009137308,0.02340789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039740265,0.0005427982,0.0010078052,0.0008338089,0.0022797326,0.0015935109,0.0028946938,0.002787097,0.0032674805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022169574,0.00069125654,0.02635799,0.00063716527,0.000031876254,0.0026318887,0.007165598,0.0012249876,0.008358691,0.08834993,0.78594494,0.07838411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019819103,0.00023476698,0.06545448,0.00022850449,0.000033846107,0.00020725704,0.0034938755,0.0005690968,0.0006991731,0.0018235784,0.9269896,0.000067606765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77606064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92783034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22393936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027387608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1321599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45051634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268057158","doi":"","title":"The Changing Shape of Legal Information","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Political science; Legal education; Engineering ethics; Law and economics; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.019842072472614287,"score_gpt":0.31902009496193656,"score_spread":0.2991780224893223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268057158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1984479,0.006427263,0.0222699,0.09045839,0.0011558603,0.00004609001,0.00032056912,0.0005419242,0.68033206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593381,0.0028786424,0.007705917,0.005839492,0.00036760105,0.000025677853,0.00016025489,0.00048817895,0.023196107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872727,0.0043996987,0.0004413895,0.001231957,0.005965584,0.0006888163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830032,0.0068891193,0.0012743461,0.0020512019,0.005087897,0.0016942642],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005184135,0.00019132711,0.00032569066,0.004045091,0.0056649446,0.024029547,0.0015568474,0.003156847,0.012505041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03317288,0.0005520165,0.0004532453,0.0030852156,0.020725565,0.025931546,0.0081384275,0.004760088,0.0024035138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016592421,0.000067189656,0.007150761,0.0002536133,0.000027825326,0.0009520482,0.16420828,0.00044551102,0.006209928,0.59181124,0.03557952,0.19312815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025163223,0.000115030576,0.014114049,0.000438226,0.000029344365,0.0017042869,0.102524385,0.0012042227,0.0035972917,0.2201131,0.65595365,0.00018127062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067582605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071211555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97597045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007108137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032231044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051573396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268101846","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2016.00745.x","title":"Is the Blush off the Rose? Legal Education Metaphors in a Changing World","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Legal education; Globalization; Resizing; Generative grammar; Legal realism; Political science; Sociology; Law; Legal profession; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.03473922675876476,"score_gpt":0.36703581993852225,"score_spread":0.33229659317975746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268101846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09526718,0.016803233,0.028608104,0.38572767,0.0017507224,0.00007698581,0.000071514565,0.00017324666,0.47152135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97110015,0.0024567388,0.005395155,0.010646459,0.00024431478,0.000062828214,0.000020928532,0.000063308304,0.010010254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924501,0.0061916895,0.00008996787,0.0002603041,0.00059708895,0.00041089914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958961,0.0027469168,0.00033520354,0.00031384133,0.0003728722,0.0003350947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006131725,0.00058921054,0.00044095228,0.002277399,0.009928644,0.010690409,0.0011187232,0.0035046875,0.004764104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009744521,0.00024526633,0.00040071993,0.002060958,0.0576637,0.01809782,0.0055910675,0.0070998087,0.0005866762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001252206,0.000013492708,0.00017789197,0.000037469665,0.0000013968254,0.00012420568,0.059133492,0.000049091956,0.000086475586,0.9306819,0.0051462655,0.004535798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028790746,0.000037091013,0.0005534552,0.00038637195,0.000008856726,0.00042378966,0.19058928,0.00084399356,0.00026268055,0.5637128,0.24312152,0.000031409523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005084681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00641228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010690409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077362005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038818445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05613035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268198655","doi":"","title":"Crossing Borders in the Classroom: A Comparative Law Experiment in Family Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Converse; Legal education; Family law; Curriculum; Law enforcement; Value (mathematics); Comparative law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10075040362343494,"score_gpt":0.4191502376183162,"score_spread":0.31839983399488125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268198655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957699,0.00003670919,0.00027285717,0.00026471482,0.000038010083,0.0006002002,0.000038768267,0.000015310781,0.0029635995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879682,0.00012800346,0.00183045,0.0004962987,0.000044138083,0.0029656866,0.000104034625,0.000023362552,0.006439778],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936918,0.0031526298,0.00030606924,0.0010610289,0.0007312053,0.0010571736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866654,0.007426402,0.000939736,0.001148873,0.0009441391,0.002875396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009881082,0.00081150973,0.0013128326,0.0011129503,0.0075897514,0.0039286693,0.0026680734,0.0036445789,0.011745005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018328955,0.0010559668,0.00061126484,0.00069846166,0.00544382,0.004793163,0.003454633,0.005588213,0.0013451178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01211912,0.40510377,0.015879076,0.0005195956,0.000095341704,0.0020239903,0.47415528,0.000702563,0.024495132,0.010172488,0.0049977903,0.049735915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025900984,0.201098,0.11502567,0.0005674644,0.00035503344,0.0010220805,0.55176544,0.0044021877,0.02364746,0.022083549,0.053597722,0.000534386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007182997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013953567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011745005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035209584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038253828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052256763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268432699","doi":"","title":"Therapeutic Consequences of Civil Actions for Damages and Compensation Claims by Victims of Sexual Abuse - An Empirical Study","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Compensation (psychology); Context (archaeology); Settlement (finance); Government (linguistics); Psychology; Criminology; Financial compensation; Sexual abuse; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Poison control; Medical emergency; Business; History","score_opus":0.06708718390976699,"score_gpt":0.42457870056139685,"score_spread":0.35749151665162987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268432699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973507,0.00027385124,0.000059171645,0.00036296734,0.000006792183,0.000031436823,0.000011315044,0.0000014879382,0.0019023136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983273,0.00077677274,0.00010240222,0.00013274727,0.000016875683,0.00005158318,0.000014877818,0.0000024527842,0.00057510415],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414945,0.0038367803,0.00031957758,0.00017669854,0.00076181185,0.000755651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778045,0.014791633,0.0049753035,0.00064052537,0.0009839534,0.00080423895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049950983,0.00038530084,0.00044416395,0.0021374067,0.008167682,0.0029558898,0.0009896542,0.0016667133,0.0030355367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032375194,0.00062009983,0.00038649203,0.0015767539,0.005829666,0.0028238022,0.0035172328,0.0028777625,0.0003168961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019065902,0.0017752303,0.12246574,0.0003212078,0.00005939883,0.0055264384,0.83975995,0.00013562027,0.00073541957,0.0031181497,0.00093368196,0.024978561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023096767,0.00058505195,0.07214897,0.00023118067,0.000034350272,0.0050284453,0.91647583,0.00018767039,0.00052151404,0.00077208737,0.0039603645,0.000031476553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00490269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010132138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008167682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002014551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015644126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026416898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268527666","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2614","title":"Book Notes: Law as Engineering: Thinking About What Lawyers Do, by David Howarth","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.016690624565669096,"score_gpt":0.3051201048877895,"score_spread":0.2884294803221204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268527666","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006094505,0.094898775,0.0033852695,0.6873774,0.015344162,0.000037570815,0.00023115195,0.00009361418,0.19802268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015477093,0.0684213,0.0041962746,0.21990006,0.015981726,0.00012671821,0.0001825703,0.0002665448,0.6754478],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906665,0.0002783093,0.000045836747,0.00013544013,0.000414794,0.00005898468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950765,0.0035780938,0.00012078894,0.0001192106,0.00088218506,0.00022326189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017385283,0.0006106101,0.0005042965,0.0018510319,0.00434304,0.007572606,0.0011139086,0.0053977817,0.018827716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006498806,0.00057444966,0.0003757263,0.0021864364,0.007805394,0.01283468,0.0016895691,0.010325224,0.0069920653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004106002,0.00000887464,0.00006307234,0.000056262765,0.0000016611212,0.000015191909,0.0006437831,0.00004250036,0.000032686192,0.07488058,0.9127048,0.011546496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004050416,0.000005338509,0.00020985164,0.000217057,0.0000031413838,0.00003753745,0.001155341,0.000054737277,0.000057061134,0.038720813,0.9595248,0.000010166443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049561556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12983187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049561556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042784745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051219426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09854615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268554781","doi":"","title":"Reflections on the U.K. Tribunal Reform: A Canadian Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Legislation; Law; Accountability; Legislature; Mandate; Public administration; Economic Justice; Commission","score_opus":0.2633364792858934,"score_gpt":0.4646374575554811,"score_spread":0.2013009782695877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268554781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037689973,0.052266043,0.00023757588,0.8497376,0.0058607315,0.00006028449,0.00053744635,0.000038644597,0.08749274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14126757,0.06669631,0.0019971451,0.7111089,0.0018806674,0.00012701305,0.000446752,0.00023182262,0.07624379],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.966886,0.004438662,0.0015062427,0.0027802966,0.012434576,0.011954315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9522321,0.0088776145,0.0014844624,0.00094757474,0.026630692,0.009827575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017881434,0.0011449935,0.002074244,0.005651279,0.053453375,0.03474179,0.008794151,0.023104021,0.02146323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040322598,0.0011745604,0.0022609862,0.013548882,0.022000724,0.011479284,0.008274712,0.025570927,0.0022860928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070439855,0.000047020534,0.0011961027,0.00073515845,0.000045832676,0.0005760194,0.012762609,0.00027559596,0.00020305367,0.22537008,0.73497635,0.023741644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040253297,0.000023455596,0.0041308724,0.0011398484,0.000059326103,0.00016637449,0.02084761,0.00011096563,0.000106510546,0.008607922,0.96456635,0.00020049693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32764658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32764658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5152162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7798346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268632605","doi":"","title":"Юридический прагматизм и социологическое направление в американском праве","year":2008,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Вестник Пермского университета Юридические науки","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Sociology; Order (exchange); Social order; Political science; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.12770670078315297,"score_gpt":0.41240248903052934,"score_spread":0.2846957882473764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268632605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08380893,0.039782446,0.12157545,0.011310626,0.0021255068,0.0003664374,0.00077900395,0.00047180985,0.7397797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80025256,0.026142167,0.08947423,0.00070649415,0.0005927015,0.00051625643,0.00026976084,0.00020054093,0.081845306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981464,0.0003388757,0.0000969805,0.00022441955,0.0010475821,0.00014578545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983767,0.000577878,0.00032882,0.00018309306,0.00041877854,0.00011461485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014864518,0.0003470813,0.00027412752,0.0021149665,0.0016171447,0.003961158,0.00039957842,0.00075501663,0.011354871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035252823,0.00045361987,0.0002760055,0.0024556057,0.002294973,0.0014486132,0.001077578,0.0014378622,0.0034436174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114856564,0.00008427114,0.0026691242,0.00037909843,0.000031391057,0.00073405256,0.0035901326,0.0012560232,0.017487649,0.6841742,0.01071086,0.27876845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005243123,0.00012695084,0.005634312,0.00025316046,0.000057588397,0.0014548476,0.001659288,0.00095908745,0.011992832,0.13389018,0.8438189,0.00010050178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053753587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074931025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011354871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018739733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046217903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0379858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269312455","doi":"","title":"Introduction - Calling for Change: Women, Law and the Legal Profession","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legal education; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Diversity (politics); Accountability; Sociology; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.019185215730997896,"score_gpt":0.34634046778529476,"score_spread":0.32715525205429685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269312455","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0081259115,0.08653548,0.0012653854,0.6944777,0.01696445,0.00010186074,0.00037929034,0.00010173404,0.19204818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23892905,0.092689686,0.0026106474,0.4142936,0.01904264,0.00035326756,0.00035324733,0.00018102629,0.23154683],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954,0.0014513892,0.00011106182,0.00050640653,0.0015555935,0.0009755603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748164,0.0011537237,0.00015737966,0.00006705887,0.0004928818,0.00064730865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030607777,0.0006117716,0.00046829705,0.0015553449,0.019020565,0.016323023,0.001439655,0.008685053,0.033122174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049229846,0.00038969563,0.00039916305,0.0027546436,0.016624197,0.013768092,0.007351535,0.009165967,0.0042338683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029142633,0.00008461822,0.0019754998,0.0007595694,0.000006254158,0.00035290414,0.10556022,0.00003793069,0.00018695147,0.2540292,0.5207147,0.116262935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032607502,0.000018009008,0.001551345,0.0008864555,0.0000029535247,0.00022581345,0.036944512,0.000013180171,0.000033490633,0.017342981,0.9429606,0.000017260558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08831103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17505854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08831103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014802706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019482063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17559397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269476679","doi":"","title":"Write a Wikipedia Article for Law School Credit - Really?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Legal writing; Work (physics); Legal education; Law; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; Public relations; Sociology; Legal research; Engineering","score_opus":0.021932507274025324,"score_gpt":0.3513724444477634,"score_spread":0.32943993717373804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269476679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24390776,0.0025660885,0.013280886,0.030325461,0.006504422,0.0006361966,0.0032165833,0.0033864328,0.69617623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4950551,0.0028745737,0.029331475,0.005123436,0.0010359248,0.00016803762,0.0028439115,0.0008084349,0.46275908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939704,0.000102300604,0.000033889522,0.000060443883,0.00031885985,0.00008753457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656963,0.00053616066,0.00028652148,0.00013172293,0.001728259,0.0007476367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070228655,0.00021443887,0.00016651982,0.0009537711,0.001880822,0.0028571791,0.00043286785,0.0006195032,0.029620962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006974438,0.00007656186,0.000092978386,0.0007922469,0.00079273095,0.001980742,0.00072494906,0.00064955704,0.00850098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005092865,0.00024146946,0.016710768,0.00045734487,0.000012314547,0.0012301935,0.026223188,0.00016749854,0.0075821443,0.014821094,0.5700874,0.36241567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004751204,0.000062053754,0.020709526,0.00016546011,0.0000062650197,0.00068421743,0.019736588,0.00033907854,0.0031032355,0.0019320362,0.95322263,0.00003426836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025593756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14389738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029620962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016567705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002444612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09909201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269765891","doi":"","title":"From Archetypes to Architects: Re-Envisioning the Role Morality of Trial Level Judges","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Impartiality; Archetype; Honesty; Independence (probability theory); Identity (music); Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11698204667649516,"score_gpt":0.3815912395627393,"score_spread":0.2646091928862442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269765891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11875717,0.007740683,0.30926496,0.19311449,0.0026499163,0.00017902508,0.000030881336,0.00016253463,0.36810035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9598336,0.0014110401,0.022986362,0.0058302465,0.00043741942,0.00011922329,0.000010817658,0.000075790456,0.00929542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96204275,0.028795626,0.00085033255,0.0021133474,0.004303752,0.0018941484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97769827,0.012754116,0.001388844,0.0026233604,0.0033366843,0.0021987627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039913096,0.0005842978,0.0006745193,0.0022226423,0.007906311,0.022862561,0.00358009,0.0079165585,0.0017512126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032946363,0.0006884135,0.0007454924,0.0009733049,0.09389287,0.02250012,0.008971657,0.019923028,0.00054304063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047492795,0.0000059640643,0.00016432413,0.000012981115,0.0000012733235,0.000034454162,0.011420066,0.00020261697,0.00006902247,0.9856719,0.00046031486,0.0019522929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012568597,0.000023320015,0.00017436968,0.0001425136,0.000004779404,0.000073881936,0.008852002,0.0015874892,0.00018312132,0.9489607,0.039961524,0.000023613162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049171974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055257156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039913096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007790688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010790872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21108317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270082067","doi":"","title":"Queering Legal Education: A Project of Theoretical Discovery","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Scholarship; Legal education; Transformative learning; Sociology; Curriculum; Queer theory; Empirical legal studies; Pedagogy; Legal research; Law; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02065842000691434,"score_gpt":0.3439022046017505,"score_spread":0.32324378459483616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270082067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05723937,0.07273665,0.25492868,0.27576077,0.0014319699,0.00081428455,0.00021515673,0.00032831618,0.3365448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8081971,0.040253796,0.122965,0.010012799,0.00079270446,0.0017045969,0.00014796293,0.00020660323,0.0157194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97177535,0.022569759,0.0005298891,0.0012936642,0.002960185,0.00087113224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92664146,0.06572786,0.0016783475,0.0025797063,0.0025190895,0.00085349346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037760433,0.0007826225,0.0014785441,0.009042582,0.009000052,0.017225955,0.0037021877,0.00488357,0.0048670475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02921646,0.000692542,0.00075716194,0.006876476,0.066446245,0.029971961,0.007275954,0.0075372574,0.00050874637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033861368,0.000028296752,0.00010415251,0.00014975235,0.000002979465,0.000029650359,0.011340419,0.00018884978,0.00002921351,0.97711235,0.0013066087,0.009704241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002047939,0.000029794977,0.00022410558,0.0015380747,0.000008044395,0.00010708464,0.035524696,0.002086846,0.00029837003,0.8656232,0.09451968,0.00001959455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006094679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066988547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037760433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018427875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02132272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19969869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270632766","doi":"10.7202/1105802ar","title":"APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER TO UNIVERSITIES’ LIMITATION OF EXPRESSION","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Academic freedom; Law; Point (geometry); Economic Justice; Political science; Action (physics); Sociology; Law and economics; Higher education; Computer science; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.024489076058810472,"score_gpt":0.2769676591945084,"score_spread":0.25247858313569793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270632766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04082802,0.009159725,0.0692301,0.14550045,0.0019897167,0.00012031312,0.00008784342,0.00022175384,0.732862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91490436,0.0024889652,0.008239825,0.007480538,0.00060191075,0.00023411696,0.00003058933,0.00012290828,0.065896824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9626319,0.024751374,0.0013486523,0.0030701286,0.0052142437,0.0029838406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96609336,0.02239352,0.0023179029,0.003927042,0.004111777,0.0011564391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026771352,0.0005441064,0.00078868924,0.0026172865,0.012365461,0.017652243,0.0025448557,0.008603159,0.007851479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047492657,0.0004416887,0.0008337498,0.0027577127,0.078223065,0.014776171,0.012290842,0.00837376,0.0011326045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050811122,0.000002152874,0.000114914146,0.000013262631,9.794431e-7,0.00003440599,0.007077894,0.00007210847,0.00002576455,0.9880888,0.0016824728,0.0028821775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002449109,0.000051229083,0.0012633875,0.00038826515,0.000015976952,0.00022868681,0.017737139,0.0008422748,0.0006999238,0.5656134,0.41306084,0.00007429041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030758165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023797503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96924186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025826247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024710877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18738341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270837153","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.829944","title":"The Spider, the Bee, the Snail and the Camel: Legal Knowledge, Practise, Culture, Institutions and Power in a Changing World","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Spider; Snail; Power (physics); Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.020473285356071052,"score_gpt":0.3567948239007073,"score_spread":0.33632153854463626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270837153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68904084,0.020579694,0.0016042623,0.13204122,0.00024886656,0.000016714173,0.000054987948,0.000023340432,0.15639012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938245,0.0018630688,0.00020123666,0.0015871956,0.00006216982,0.000004697071,0.0000053114345,0.0000046488653,0.002447201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981938,0.0011361655,0.00005132129,0.000115531504,0.00031491995,0.00018829491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715793,0.001572926,0.00042147288,0.000120814526,0.00019865905,0.0005282067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002633839,0.00011719573,0.00024212987,0.0014476699,0.0039985892,0.008620437,0.0005176668,0.0022424336,0.0032868376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004898275,0.00011910522,0.00010997426,0.0018348492,0.023741215,0.0075120204,0.00322466,0.0017934341,0.00019662423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086882355,0.00007473523,0.021676468,0.00013262882,0.000020349027,0.0009037149,0.4306558,0.00013456629,0.0007574795,0.48655093,0.008752922,0.050253525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025382138,0.000120112054,0.03352071,0.00036337852,0.000019268378,0.0011772577,0.5458825,0.00047894637,0.0004139168,0.20226513,0.21567531,0.00005813881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011068162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016924256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011068162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028682153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003160228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022007465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271463290","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1214","title":"Book Review: The New Lawyer: How Settlement is Transforming the Practice of Law, by Julie Macfarlane","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Settlement (finance); Political science; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.033049956485663085,"score_gpt":0.3513677939636854,"score_spread":0.31831783747802234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271463290","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017663089,0.87449825,0.00035949808,0.067239866,0.03855707,0.00004185592,0.00008605905,0.000037145117,0.019003624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025074368,0.83534384,0.00060860213,0.04522525,0.030460188,0.000107748056,0.00015931208,0.000055164524,0.08553246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904555,0.0002138143,0.000057202844,0.00012018604,0.00051183737,0.000051409137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973947,0.0015015133,0.00021840181,0.000049914615,0.0006094947,0.0002259419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010744792,0.00093576516,0.0010721495,0.0021289212,0.0009811387,0.004230155,0.0010937846,0.0026545792,0.01562586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007628412,0.00047146215,0.00043265749,0.0042545768,0.0016367947,0.0043405187,0.0011198946,0.0047651622,0.007796629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006878254,0.000006640148,0.000032065487,0.0005115161,0.0000048641186,0.000022276981,0.00007817492,0.000031825995,0.00004265435,0.0016304686,0.97054523,0.027087407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006474268,0.0000127354,0.0002966902,0.0011246209,0.000005349747,0.00018406443,0.00011379379,0.000025080612,0.000021883814,0.0007886164,0.997414,0.000006731814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007381804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02029387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01562586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025653178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004118291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05227375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271561690","doi":"","title":"The Changing Social Role of Urban Law Schools","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.009474036657334628,"score_gpt":0.30996466354972746,"score_spread":0.3004906268923928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271561690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96959543,0.0004185399,0.00022654067,0.005475884,0.00004183138,0.000011817282,0.00010112722,0.000011515925,0.024117298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973732,0.00018749389,0.000057118094,0.00018499946,0.00002083438,0.0000046849495,0.00002793066,0.0000036264198,0.0021401695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983576,0.0006600061,0.000031194355,0.0001784685,0.00019692251,0.00057570793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996999,0.00067500473,0.00070561504,0.00013153984,0.00049235334,0.0009964642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012530747,0.00010370597,0.00023070701,0.0027234035,0.0048308126,0.0037934734,0.0008351285,0.0007878889,0.008416037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035547279,0.00024008438,0.00014394,0.002658211,0.004654454,0.002794374,0.0034243555,0.0012004119,0.00036834308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020946677,0.000494277,0.45187414,0.00016456796,0.000052566134,0.0010549584,0.27773744,0.0005457921,0.0011276271,0.1483012,0.012510308,0.10592764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002192568,0.00013021029,0.550303,0.00013591426,0.00001964133,0.00017542845,0.35831678,0.0005296349,0.00028519824,0.0045350594,0.085505426,0.00004186675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04259277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11412968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04259277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048307027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024558883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08468968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271715383","doi":"","title":"Citations to Wikipedia in Canadian Law Journal and Law Review Articles","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal research; Citation; Information literacy; Law; Political science; Citation analysis; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04487783406451451,"score_gpt":0.37980119516322114,"score_spread":0.33492336109870663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271715383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39415964,0.17630629,0.0016203056,0.029196747,0.0058884337,0.0008807824,0.053824,0.0004322439,0.3376916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8591482,0.07672803,0.0040045953,0.0036784261,0.0012994342,0.0004011992,0.017909812,0.00024561412,0.03658474],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97208035,0.0022574044,0.002663961,0.0012096487,0.019609004,0.0021796436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79706275,0.054346874,0.023921305,0.0019005024,0.11704076,0.0057278634],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007986952,0.00034612158,0.00083393767,0.156314,0.007643201,0.00980245,0.0013103941,0.0012528981,0.005016642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14743781,0.00034973022,0.00038113634,0.2003266,0.0026393735,0.0026343814,0.0027859055,0.00074291165,0.0006191641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023963052,0.00012293467,0.19164084,0.014214398,0.00053351745,0.0023215967,0.056256607,0.0008200492,0.0016139088,0.055676345,0.33427495,0.34228522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020757449,0.000027153259,0.38586977,0.0058282204,0.00034280366,0.0008271877,0.020049209,0.0006034754,0.00092714245,0.003000137,0.58230937,0.00019485218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86375636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9393357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99201304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04194607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09225636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30434144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272655456","doi":"","title":"Back to Basics? University Legal Education and 21st Century Professionalism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Curriculum; Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Legal profession; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.029028857513419642,"score_gpt":0.3322947306734505,"score_spread":0.30326587316003084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272655456","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14706524,0.009437258,0.0034899816,0.54587924,0.0008382544,0.000020728226,0.000016794735,0.00005863274,0.29319394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589079,0.0021271133,0.0009767627,0.022068195,0.00032863516,0.000022839089,0.0000074254303,0.00002287835,0.015538092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952673,0.0025613783,0.00007776292,0.00031007876,0.0010306536,0.00075294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633324,0.001614472,0.0003070696,0.00027284547,0.0005674683,0.0009048685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004153651,0.00012776977,0.00022639812,0.0011547144,0.0076254634,0.007939627,0.0007164747,0.0033628293,0.0044403495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012750163,0.0001390183,0.00018650564,0.0008192335,0.029102013,0.008159347,0.0042309547,0.0045758965,0.00038404725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012746805,0.000082971346,0.001963427,0.000042008312,0.0000023413468,0.0000580801,0.035393033,0.00016790687,0.00012543375,0.89257383,0.015995588,0.053582534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021242671,0.00008504025,0.008680006,0.00044834072,0.000004117318,0.00014875065,0.05380892,0.00049738307,0.00023911845,0.56316406,0.37288073,0.000022229331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030873578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043881234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030873578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015644794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011701119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11351144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273347576","doi":"","title":"Feminists, Angels, Poets, and Revolutionaries: What I've Learned from Ruthann Robson and Nicole Brossard on What it Means to Be a Law Teacher","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.060006420201950614,"score_gpt":0.3428974027585497,"score_spread":0.28289098255659906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273347576","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004771213,0.110016845,0.00092352054,0.8418674,0.009022706,0.00001617603,0.000022293565,0.000030515834,0.03332941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18966787,0.24267876,0.0044713593,0.39765498,0.02062149,0.000207581,0.00008991699,0.00030623397,0.14430189],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966511,0.0021179316,0.00006353673,0.00027303456,0.00057746953,0.00031691056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887687,0.008666212,0.00034762142,0.00023332488,0.0010276003,0.0009565781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005628509,0.000566051,0.0007382745,0.00080594304,0.01166638,0.008289979,0.0013123082,0.004563353,0.006642809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010204598,0.0004222035,0.0002985089,0.0009201672,0.020377481,0.012605788,0.0036761733,0.014659068,0.001276573],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046246303,0.0000902087,0.00073850906,0.00064537127,0.000011661004,0.00034950548,0.16188528,0.00009779191,0.0002714544,0.11666394,0.568681,0.1505191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065342715,0.000025946822,0.0006056431,0.0014440865,0.0000049330743,0.00019072788,0.08808519,0.000051456445,0.0001818408,0.017932454,0.89144814,0.00002306073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025354419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06657729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025354419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057697194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006342217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05041367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274205176","doi":"","title":"Clinical Legal Education: A (Brief) Comparison of the Evolving Structures and Pedagogy in Mexico, Canada and the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Pedagogy; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04197700472240273,"score_gpt":0.45058393880165637,"score_spread":0.40860693407925364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274205176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71715695,0.051902894,0.00089930126,0.08698615,0.00057276024,0.00037421408,0.0016136651,0.0000755806,0.14041841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481713,0.036178432,0.0016645009,0.004685742,0.000108013184,0.0001960804,0.00095409655,0.000021070076,0.00802074],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837315,0.00022218016,0.000055991684,0.000098274366,0.0005360057,0.00071435433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649435,0.00044253436,0.00043265778,0.000039508275,0.0013600192,0.0012309127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013883177,0.00016652777,0.00020684686,0.00396834,0.008794234,0.003905235,0.0010544715,0.000852784,0.0026652783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047161486,0.00018474141,0.00023539424,0.0072052293,0.0019693766,0.0013052025,0.002411863,0.0015799828,0.000090790105],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003478961,0.00053479354,0.3158119,0.0012998453,0.000056384946,0.0012832676,0.08325617,0.00069861504,0.0010834947,0.062333126,0.046918366,0.48637614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003723393,0.00013273439,0.73603565,0.001095171,0.00004568222,0.00048043265,0.111004695,0.00021704458,0.00029370663,0.000844188,0.14976348,0.000050011018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96685356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09156144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09156144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12096928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66432786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274565570","doi":"10.14288/1.0055094","title":"The impact of computer aided drafting technology on industrial education curriculum in British Columbia secondary schools","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Mathematics education; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Engineering management; Pedagogy; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0116121521349934,"score_gpt":0.2624846110366459,"score_spread":0.2508724589016525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274565570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940223,0.00012484702,0.000038694252,0.00014739194,0.000007735913,0.000023749271,0.0000843392,0.000009283627,0.0055417176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945163,0.0002623309,0.00027391754,0.00005815806,0.000003937054,0.000021142223,0.00022844777,0.000003939751,0.0046317936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982969,0.00022034183,0.00008002589,0.00011791653,0.00085937383,0.00042553796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99435776,0.000831585,0.0006801496,0.00008612837,0.0023699945,0.0016742877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010776417,0.00016646856,0.00019908174,0.0018997226,0.0012783215,0.0016617379,0.00047535903,0.00029514616,0.004636557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066819238,0.00018329211,0.00011979672,0.0020056693,0.0003675831,0.0002888454,0.00074336457,0.00037659786,0.0004912901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002123424,0.0007724583,0.75044775,0.00038378,0.000010570978,0.0010274668,0.017824708,0.00055057264,0.006542915,0.0008875158,0.0040832586,0.21725668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044703147,0.000083091014,0.9913191,0.000055799406,0.0000026400198,0.00003816211,0.003999485,0.00013374211,0.00036200316,0.000018002058,0.003978691,0.000004786033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46409458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66772914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5359054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006900949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01429331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9227865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275482756","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4417","title":"THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE: LESSONS FROM LAWYER-LICENSING REFORM","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Humanities; Law; Legal profession; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07006859944101311,"score_gpt":0.39852298376303613,"score_spread":0.328454384322023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275482756","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19908443,0.013419137,0.0017052715,0.438855,0.00060278916,0.00023250919,0.00019776222,0.000059253405,0.3458438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402044,0.004842081,0.0007542371,0.017706813,0.0002225978,0.00008851846,0.0000630241,0.000028013726,0.03609038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865345,0.0021855754,0.00022449894,0.00067050394,0.0035890585,0.006795972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818543,0.0046282257,0.0007629446,0.0006374881,0.004339547,0.0077774273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006409558,0.0003689324,0.0007790182,0.002704315,0.034789912,0.016643267,0.0035387552,0.0072869216,0.009918988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02031513,0.0003737687,0.0006219845,0.0047455127,0.044131294,0.0078116525,0.011973846,0.008102796,0.00035113937],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033706405,0.00013551877,0.006160993,0.00015366515,0.000016510414,0.0006058324,0.04856055,0.00065486773,0.00015695838,0.8838996,0.022751458,0.036870252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014116896,0.00009958208,0.06420975,0.0011125231,0.00007592795,0.00023342491,0.14221801,0.0019208381,0.00042510018,0.1722869,0.61709464,0.00018215923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99342304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31634963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31634963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4927484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7929375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276365490","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2637480","title":"Law Without Lawyers: Judges and Justice System Design in the Twenty-First Century","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.04781145153785148,"score_gpt":0.3414997358758184,"score_spread":0.2936882843379669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276365490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3663542,0.010176652,0.030613413,0.15310842,0.0011949968,0.00017996601,0.00009590382,0.0001725316,0.43810397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728874,0.0008299738,0.003693748,0.004410087,0.00017889135,0.000050256054,0.000012679497,0.000045827703,0.0178912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98657936,0.008072808,0.000372761,0.0013173848,0.0019708106,0.0016869691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98335415,0.009130982,0.0011671971,0.0009787284,0.0031509623,0.0022178753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015049391,0.00027564127,0.00040970393,0.0018916494,0.0097307535,0.013649656,0.0020944204,0.0053400155,0.009753341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031847328,0.0004466916,0.00032237565,0.0011089753,0.029491687,0.005790688,0.0044499594,0.004610001,0.0004655684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026840984,0.000079810685,0.0021831184,0.0000534673,0.000014168465,0.00012173681,0.015033832,0.0009082405,0.00017236067,0.9586788,0.004457086,0.01827061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008781753,0.00016305102,0.006316115,0.00027720217,0.00003423104,0.00018592087,0.018390078,0.0027778149,0.00078950956,0.79164594,0.17926118,0.00007114549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016881675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03437402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016881675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01339832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02315085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097212076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276639011","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2205830","title":"Response to Ministry of Justice Consultation Paper 'Judicial Review: Proposals for Reform'","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Economic Justice; Political science; Judicial reform; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.0215169845892325,"score_gpt":0.3831318220319755,"score_spread":0.361614837442743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276639011","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005191622,0.00036945444,0.000108466826,0.98736084,0.009773109,0.00006416997,0.00019264537,0.00006767127,0.001544433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015334706,0.00011332575,0.00013654608,0.9872476,0.0054953047,0.00008101977,0.00003830985,0.00003861175,0.005315885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9421334,0.008149057,0.0069840746,0.0059751687,0.018057453,0.018700857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9002706,0.056492083,0.0065895887,0.0025923955,0.018683894,0.01537146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039829053,0.0034745303,0.0049047424,0.0038810407,0.026660858,0.026280168,0.015236883,0.3430023,0.023258494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16518793,0.0056781056,0.0061452608,0.004936572,0.0117191635,0.010889208,0.012481456,0.16982673,0.011556128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104977946,0.000048205533,0.0002781301,0.00012285977,0.000031636555,0.0007120612,0.00055569445,0.000106766354,0.00028622965,0.0037087053,0.9922125,0.001832317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034341047,0.00013938584,0.0050663096,0.0008741234,0.00017468086,0.00051721104,0.0023513872,0.0007867265,0.0009094622,0.007514288,0.98101735,0.00030557034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09360704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17145161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3430023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053422015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09225156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38760567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278379828","doi":"","title":"The Future of Online Legal Journalism: The Courts Speak Only Through Their Opinions?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hyperbole; Journalism; Supreme court; Law; Media studies; Dream; Political science; The Internet; Dystopia; History; Sociology; Metaphor","score_opus":0.028812610485731683,"score_gpt":0.30327538079414645,"score_spread":0.27446277030841476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278379828","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00691408,0.02455345,0.0013457607,0.81965214,0.0035650113,0.000009783336,0.000076296135,0.00005653983,0.14382684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6384635,0.05916438,0.003971802,0.20308918,0.03471274,0.00010220915,0.00016737738,0.00023190958,0.06009688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913549,0.004677271,0.000274156,0.0005430668,0.0020409354,0.0011096586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671446,0.0185658,0.002092143,0.0017994718,0.004731672,0.005666281],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010466523,0.00027868967,0.0003444571,0.0023661656,0.010019022,0.035020683,0.0016223852,0.009711264,0.017441398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028981728,0.0003551055,0.00027919817,0.0023315959,0.020456035,0.06230025,0.005251692,0.010613469,0.0034712001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036866128,0.0000910257,0.0014275593,0.00020522016,0.000008805814,0.000262224,0.018724144,0.0000826429,0.0002534653,0.6889879,0.19402201,0.09589811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013656377,0.000026127875,0.0011128964,0.0008068774,0.000008309358,0.00018290424,0.029803252,0.00025913163,0.00024216252,0.20751013,0.7599982,0.00003641364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005661417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010142024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9649793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060894005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008770918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058347285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278559094","doi":"","title":"Taking Responsibility: Mandatory Legal Ethics in Canadian Law Schools","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Legal ethics; Political science; Legal profession; Legal education; Law","score_opus":0.0429138171843332,"score_gpt":0.4115984368368675,"score_spread":0.3686846196525343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278559094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73242253,0.002569998,0.0018050784,0.19247293,0.0005824469,0.00020244268,0.00011486699,0.00011359786,0.06971606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808154,0.000832633,0.0012499813,0.0071997857,0.000032561147,0.000033651984,0.000044582743,0.000020118332,0.009771293],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98627406,0.0021535538,0.000378143,0.0013082607,0.0048330724,0.005052892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639993,0.006578365,0.0040484457,0.00071161176,0.008156522,0.016505793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009189642,0.00040416562,0.00048744484,0.0016987297,0.045499664,0.0084155435,0.003728699,0.0047714235,0.0060367887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02580797,0.0008167104,0.000462302,0.0025495586,0.014196823,0.0037463387,0.00864263,0.009264682,0.0002702598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014222394,0.0007067262,0.1024554,0.0010200085,0.000046346955,0.0033693684,0.47902477,0.0008909603,0.0040290058,0.17738156,0.07477771,0.1561559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000504091,0.00019474934,0.2607985,0.0012795583,0.00007000166,0.00048688846,0.45176226,0.0020796515,0.0019003662,0.011600855,0.2694471,0.0003296572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9843099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8258832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1741168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3879654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95790744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279541649","doi":"","title":"Generalist Judges, Technical Expertise, and the Standard of Review: A Presentation by Justice Marshall Rothstein of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Presentation (obstetrics); Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.018759514937994604,"score_gpt":0.30986420318500907,"score_spread":0.29110468824701446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279541649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003882574,0.015164101,0.0026286875,0.94315803,0.0052344417,0.00017980246,0.00019353782,0.00008159868,0.029477188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14325543,0.009548573,0.008009012,0.78429866,0.010584204,0.00034185246,0.00016274833,0.00017475757,0.0436248],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8807963,0.023199625,0.0069197705,0.010025393,0.06424851,0.014810438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.833088,0.08734329,0.0058323843,0.0056026806,0.05749655,0.010637091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09861096,0.00071205804,0.0020517656,0.004097152,0.026364038,0.025763264,0.007030046,0.04601925,0.0030482842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20290634,0.0014776109,0.001742666,0.0058303066,0.026103746,0.0074736523,0.0053147837,0.02768042,0.0006011442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039144757,0.000032680175,0.0016062345,0.00019426923,0.00006980665,0.00058540574,0.004259015,0.00030920125,0.0004764381,0.39938113,0.57696736,0.016079403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018054234,0.000058752867,0.008371206,0.0011154391,0.00017292885,0.00043063523,0.0036897536,0.0012966015,0.00076902314,0.13253988,0.85090613,0.00046911946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.679601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84131247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9355277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064472295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18295382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6445718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279968631","doi":"","title":"Liberal Arts and Professional Education: A Call for Philosopher-Servants","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections Canadian Journal of Music","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal arts education; The arts; Sociology; Media studies; Pedagogy; Political science; Visual arts; Management; Art; Higher education; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.04735761823137846,"score_gpt":0.3497705589858728,"score_spread":0.3024129407544943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279968631","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010746147,0.0010732125,0.00018432803,0.9906309,0.0021626833,0.000009229886,0.0000041734443,0.000015612515,0.004845232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0932294,0.0029291322,0.001494644,0.8652866,0.0072243595,0.0001313456,0.000023556873,0.00011307462,0.029567998],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764737,0.009156727,0.00076388556,0.0019033311,0.0039113048,0.0077910936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8988323,0.03535437,0.0030643758,0.0022673863,0.007921945,0.05255963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031644627,0.00073868304,0.0014942446,0.0021175465,0.0366934,0.026959585,0.0037820428,0.07488446,0.04211482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053590454,0.0010240069,0.0013500211,0.0013641216,0.044887055,0.030728446,0.024621222,0.0535086,0.0041620345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007247521,0.00020212804,0.0011267654,0.00013767814,0.000010665634,0.000826507,0.028152134,0.00008139116,0.00033936006,0.22948854,0.7172698,0.022292554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010222056,0.000063134896,0.0015046508,0.00059141853,0.000012254184,0.00043725903,0.07214215,0.00019656439,0.00011173337,0.08553216,0.8392093,0.000097207376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01751763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045285523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07488446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013975331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0727678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16735476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280006720","doi":"10.11575/prism/34132","title":"No Right to Silence During Employer Investigations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Boss; Dignity; Public relations; Silence; Business; Right to know; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.017114049661116043,"score_gpt":0.26972544723811176,"score_spread":0.2526113975769957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280006720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053360593,0.007965347,0.02328521,0.43744355,0.010533674,0.00019142727,0.00009368418,0.0003872462,0.46673924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6697766,0.0018419855,0.0027579318,0.24552475,0.0026250696,0.00024128781,0.000056300447,0.00035902203,0.07681695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94342834,0.030692512,0.0020317766,0.0034002839,0.010534528,0.009912524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93012,0.0392616,0.0069624665,0.0073425933,0.0062023755,0.010111055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030926103,0.00048100806,0.0010578457,0.0007715774,0.017665023,0.013528039,0.0035592725,0.025824204,0.011136387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12165697,0.00093895034,0.00074516213,0.00052832806,0.034668747,0.013356393,0.015937839,0.030418904,0.006616769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001815426,0.000125239,0.0057672886,0.00033581938,0.00006406381,0.008961258,0.26562455,0.00021098669,0.0034581576,0.49182105,0.16731577,0.05613426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050577848,0.00011676358,0.0013545859,0.0015266234,0.000033974597,0.0035888846,0.10994928,0.00027155748,0.0020762205,0.094167426,0.7867335,0.00013064822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008519016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01646663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030926103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004331535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012715115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16355485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281213616","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v26i2.14750","title":"COMMUNITY LEGAL WORKERS IN ONTARIO: A PARALEGAL CASE STUDY","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Legislation; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Political science; Community organization; Public administration; Community standards; Economic Justice; Community development; Public relations; Law; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.10086474531232464,"score_gpt":0.400237994083749,"score_spread":0.29937324877142435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281213616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89411354,0.0015389097,0.0007388954,0.011472501,0.00011259242,0.0003709913,0.00026873162,0.000025647625,0.091358155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97057354,0.0018958347,0.00062457327,0.0014103906,0.000047155492,0.00013103796,0.00009055655,0.000020125683,0.025206752],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679923,0.0007821783,0.000063758154,0.000178657,0.0007698007,0.0014063388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650735,0.0008521716,0.00041159996,0.00011527715,0.0006063217,0.0015072697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015224767,0.00043343086,0.00041000947,0.0015826026,0.039061412,0.0030108786,0.0021847321,0.003327769,0.0057334746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038500763,0.00044019485,0.0002655448,0.0040666987,0.0077387337,0.0011433418,0.0034490936,0.0021438887,0.0004621494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010096321,0.00031681804,0.049003895,0.00031437218,0.000015705586,0.064050555,0.79779196,0.00052372756,0.0010832655,0.04251878,0.022390176,0.021889767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003571185,0.00014348405,0.0414575,0.00033638606,0.000024029665,0.006491996,0.77892894,0.00078025815,0.00023511922,0.0020698002,0.16944727,0.000049514227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9413482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07004943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07004943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06586289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50824654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282293003","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4414","title":"“FICTIONAL VISIONS”: AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL REFLECTIONS ON RE-READING THE ALCHEMY OF RACE AND RIGHTS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Alchemy; Vision; Narrative; Reading (process); Politics; Race (biology); Law; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Literature; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.08293260776188556,"score_gpt":0.43388478965345184,"score_spread":0.3509521818915663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282293003","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061019436,0.019505752,0.011792696,0.46225592,0.019411108,0.00010776497,0.00029906438,0.0002444208,0.42536375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72488797,0.00733992,0.0024658327,0.06450506,0.0055881813,0.00013339239,0.00018028413,0.000989671,0.19390966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597555,0.002866384,0.000058080986,0.00033470895,0.00035202343,0.00041324412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935855,0.0047510983,0.00024585327,0.00045900285,0.000556509,0.00040204226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005186787,0.0012900695,0.0005884624,0.0019878575,0.018064044,0.011058599,0.0018999848,0.0073561394,0.01222824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0133380825,0.0005217845,0.0005240793,0.0014929639,0.05099876,0.016219214,0.0071919076,0.027777318,0.0017466672],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027954717,0.000031469834,0.00012274085,0.000081516315,0.0000074968575,0.0004277504,0.5981548,0.000072629926,0.00035115058,0.29324824,0.10008455,0.0073897014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008615865,0.0000119240285,0.0002290536,0.0002501599,0.000006355098,0.00030800933,0.19441716,0.00008039671,0.000431141,0.033397317,0.77083904,0.000020757374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023073593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034875214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023073593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010331214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038342497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07495856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282566548","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.006","title":"Can a modern legal system do without the trust?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.03455865241831211,"score_gpt":0.2582080142440429,"score_spread":0.22364936182573078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282566548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007931789,0.01034826,0.00987615,0.31532225,0.0019465336,0.00003416357,0.000051646595,0.00012205742,0.65436715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60558826,0.009784363,0.01111674,0.07545853,0.0033125,0.00018742014,0.00007163527,0.00031842908,0.29416212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963924,0.0016559133,0.000097335724,0.00036148453,0.0009110103,0.0005819073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946707,0.0028582134,0.00029634268,0.0009492303,0.00063234445,0.00059321546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008156461,0.00043744096,0.000620378,0.0011718922,0.005148733,0.011873596,0.0014373987,0.012383423,0.015084483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014364286,0.0005216666,0.0004202386,0.0008956391,0.03844736,0.026746634,0.004021586,0.011737796,0.003891448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019553179,0.000010601967,0.000033632274,0.000010471498,0.0000015754046,0.000012336523,0.0006749797,0.00006104008,0.000022418373,0.9843873,0.01016398,0.0046197264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007449309,0.000007696757,0.00008971895,0.00006571965,0.000002265511,0.00001715811,0.00062391645,0.00015554276,0.000044638437,0.9011712,0.0978066,0.000008034126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008732583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010412844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015084483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061090277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009622045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050462604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282642089","doi":"","title":"Doing Contract Theory in First Year Law School: The Iceberg Method","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université Laval; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Property (philosophy); Law; Identification (biology); Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Legal psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016508778511522403,"score_gpt":0.37124780099682003,"score_spread":0.35473902248529765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282642089","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060759846,0.0019308829,0.48716313,0.026018275,0.0007685966,0.0007150804,0.00016826273,0.00021828886,0.4222577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79362214,0.0014789564,0.16253659,0.0029696752,0.00030462196,0.0022260915,0.00013055772,0.00030192942,0.036429517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97930497,0.016064243,0.00033880796,0.0014715939,0.0017801347,0.0010402974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97098976,0.021647837,0.0012309984,0.002635114,0.001618134,0.0018781264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026839027,0.00068838266,0.00082581484,0.003233359,0.008044234,0.009799142,0.0034412374,0.0029913692,0.01915122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028053816,0.0010217461,0.0006733246,0.0026879369,0.026604652,0.014235916,0.0070393994,0.0065500108,0.002296219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002277894,0.00010278271,0.00075657625,0.00004116261,0.0000039395077,0.000038509897,0.0076198094,0.00044896765,0.00003259813,0.97354126,0.0026308782,0.014760691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006999201,0.000056862096,0.00069312326,0.00029623698,0.000009797114,0.0000788868,0.00657926,0.004424693,0.00029410102,0.9262521,0.061220955,0.00002409126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005477617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076830075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026839027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012520112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010333364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14194006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284268404","doi":"","title":"Rethinking 'Like a Lawyer': An Incrementalist's Proposal for First Year Curriculum Reform","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Scholarship; Philosophy of law; Legal profession; Legal education; Curriculum; Competence (human resources); Practice of law; Sociology; Legal research; Subject (documents); Legal practice; Political science; Empirical legal studies; Legal ethics; Comparative law; Psychology","score_opus":0.025046641968533734,"score_gpt":0.34530723773431216,"score_spread":0.3202605957657784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284268404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10016744,0.0040725595,0.07707884,0.54820585,0.0063107363,0.0010197525,0.00014046492,0.0013095523,0.2616948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75339174,0.001601468,0.061756372,0.07229784,0.0023671808,0.0011446408,0.000120848665,0.00019435368,0.10712557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934111,0.0026641896,0.00019491318,0.0008371053,0.0011637406,0.0017288415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987914,0.0043125907,0.00083036517,0.00080854836,0.0021066945,0.004027839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010928212,0.00046069987,0.0004055071,0.002104999,0.0056110104,0.008320719,0.004430832,0.008904164,0.010844014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024828838,0.0004570658,0.00092508027,0.00081285444,0.009008987,0.011581571,0.009954857,0.009628931,0.0012680001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006940764,0.00084330933,0.0015878979,0.00017714432,0.0000108072545,0.0001727865,0.0063893283,0.00097593,0.0007080598,0.8889014,0.029175319,0.07098858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002578624,0.00094989163,0.009379047,0.0007301633,0.00006848461,0.0003900921,0.0079774745,0.007880239,0.001887576,0.39790845,0.5724244,0.00014637035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015527253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024510235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015527253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013191439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025669564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09571105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284435770","doi":"10.14288/1.0055741","title":"Sacrificing intellectual excellence to administrative and political convenience in British Columbia public schools : departmental examinations re-examined","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Politics; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03314527652837747,"score_gpt":0.2835999841779292,"score_spread":0.25045470764955174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284435770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.780813,0.0045975856,0.0005123864,0.074422546,0.00038824553,0.000043222888,0.00015219871,0.000034720433,0.1390361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96485186,0.001728839,0.00023857408,0.0029535852,0.00006151217,0.00001212217,0.00004203904,0.000022589407,0.03008883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99346536,0.0012406128,0.00019502369,0.00046270134,0.0017821874,0.0028540955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807257,0.005420866,0.0018550325,0.0006236954,0.0077767186,0.003597992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005869555,0.00015761923,0.000328635,0.0026492267,0.015964776,0.012463308,0.0012426303,0.0018579005,0.0038011954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02142713,0.0003671178,0.00013505676,0.0049932525,0.010955412,0.0023794726,0.004314409,0.005849894,0.00026769482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020754516,0.00021193737,0.0907468,0.00034463976,0.00002870923,0.0022111048,0.17194383,0.0008045163,0.0014141,0.36664945,0.07278301,0.29265434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040348878,0.000079339174,0.3849443,0.0009130847,0.000043854885,0.00035519662,0.15192206,0.0007483781,0.0024703688,0.015491867,0.44282222,0.00016902479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94263405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9815656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11337322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11337322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.121418096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82258415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284517968","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Case Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal research; Political science","score_opus":0.4299321490574306,"score_gpt":0.5795687673692017,"score_spread":0.1496366183117711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284517968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014940223,0.015615153,0.003919267,0.045434717,0.0023950916,0.0025559487,0.05716835,0.0014370215,0.86998045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011717857,0.017528605,0.018835485,0.007614574,0.00060074206,0.002472537,0.019619934,0.00087328296,0.92073697],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918778,0.0011706835,0.0007945922,0.00048151563,0.0049687694,0.00070667366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9351784,0.017616455,0.0011896603,0.0017429017,0.041587453,0.0026852526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010514933,0.0013196216,0.0009850397,0.018323714,0.009238488,0.009955177,0.0032776573,0.0062088785,0.18528599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04995178,0.001443248,0.0006238031,0.02774509,0.004144214,0.00448615,0.0017348983,0.003790544,0.033657793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005980133,0.000012638228,0.00011658955,0.00022466281,8.4875313e-7,0.000013387769,0.0003005982,0.000059070288,0.000022350208,0.010732352,0.971817,0.016694473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000138546975,0.000004244604,0.0018930176,0.00053554436,0.000005722382,0.000019563464,0.00081545697,0.000085150015,0.00006539445,0.0032239538,0.99331784,0.00002008453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95507693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9853962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18528599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07439181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2359318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61984336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285289780","doi":"","title":"Promises and Challenges of Achieving Racial Equality in Legal Education in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Political science; Legal education; Division (mathematics); Racial equality; Law; Public administration; Library science; Racism; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.049065674968323564,"score_gpt":0.3463874808170077,"score_spread":0.2973218058486842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285289780","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040863726,0.045544986,0.0015407365,0.73335904,0.0019375988,0.00009574769,0.00036053426,0.000076350036,0.17622124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82616615,0.039025705,0.0043796413,0.078177094,0.0009830238,0.00010263266,0.00023658508,0.000081321625,0.05084779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878231,0.0017849205,0.00020910297,0.00062519254,0.0038855907,0.0056720655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98189455,0.0028471958,0.00055518287,0.0003509923,0.0066025145,0.0077495403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013507176,0.0003145567,0.00074713957,0.002134504,0.023160683,0.010992752,0.002544931,0.005285747,0.013844092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02334217,0.0003184522,0.0005878015,0.0035276634,0.010173513,0.004981984,0.0062035816,0.0063757114,0.0005669951],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010604154,0.00010279996,0.0062718936,0.0004777791,0.00004298831,0.00028533384,0.016054144,0.0011293506,0.00033381072,0.56923556,0.1954722,0.21048813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012162808,0.00010038036,0.03768373,0.0020203623,0.000103519575,0.00018847075,0.04281409,0.0019842936,0.0007960913,0.09874869,0.8152699,0.00016875422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99497235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.864634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13536602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42303315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98215383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285389918","doi":"","title":"Magic circle holds back tide of mergers -- for now","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Lawyer","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"MAGIC (telescope); Revenue; Mergers and acquisitions; Law; History; Political science; Economy; Economic history; Business; Economics; Accounting; Physics","score_opus":0.04654580909293181,"score_gpt":0.3748581178393734,"score_spread":0.3283123087464416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285389918","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105259925,0.038044114,0.004366396,0.45800066,0.0056501995,0.000034422563,0.00025728464,0.00049514184,0.38789186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8062437,0.02728457,0.002513183,0.054753214,0.0035623976,0.000028250304,0.00024571773,0.00018470382,0.10518433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675804,0.0006571203,0.000108099885,0.0004134907,0.0014979733,0.0005652664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991245,0.0032308009,0.0013778316,0.0006763736,0.0018079941,0.0016620003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020609559,0.00026524925,0.00030980312,0.0011155679,0.0042033154,0.012778391,0.0005506715,0.0031904974,0.017916087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012647258,0.00023343346,0.0003099485,0.0024623454,0.008073668,0.013041379,0.0031824668,0.0036468462,0.0022334154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015510697,0.000057835663,0.010603535,0.00028237785,0.000023678778,0.00048555128,0.006518907,0.00020148346,0.0011680836,0.6001663,0.1813295,0.19900759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015098341,0.00019133884,0.014795655,0.00053792656,0.00002491155,0.0006829056,0.009867416,0.00030365936,0.0011635132,0.04541919,0.92692274,0.00007564066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024776962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039588418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024776962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048953886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006642859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05993527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286131691","doi":"10.29173/alr1284","title":"Dispute Resolution, Access to Civil Justice and Legal Education","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Center for Information Technology; University of Alberta; Government of Canada","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Dispute mechanism; Public administration; Law; Public relations; Geography","score_opus":0.04797087079497804,"score_gpt":0.4305722129150825,"score_spread":0.3826013421201045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286131691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07914071,0.12787126,0.002810091,0.16604832,0.0006530769,0.000062637264,0.000119218384,0.000043014214,0.6232516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92028826,0.035950962,0.00083341514,0.00684054,0.0006618761,0.000033425167,0.00006138431,0.000010624354,0.03531959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99147683,0.0029282041,0.00019712039,0.00044297345,0.0030782898,0.001876515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852465,0.007670337,0.0019957318,0.00030006206,0.0016809939,0.0031064749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046256413,0.00016520749,0.0004514561,0.002003772,0.0048188954,0.009843562,0.0014159374,0.0025126475,0.01958611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014042862,0.00018776681,0.00016774148,0.0037215904,0.015278717,0.004680476,0.0048556407,0.0026025986,0.0005409038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002570097,0.00016867192,0.007902626,0.0004732994,0.0000146214215,0.00025913108,0.006923008,0.0004089884,0.000089060515,0.82134956,0.016978394,0.14540693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052022733,0.00013726727,0.05359177,0.0019123809,0.000024954139,0.00050943135,0.024223316,0.000422087,0.00024585976,0.24850148,0.670326,0.00005345471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20910703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36655435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20910703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018014159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03165089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41577983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286285386","doi":"10.7202/1100323ar","title":"THE NIGHTMARE OF LITIGATING IN MULTIPLE FORA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nightmare; History; Political science; Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.04204732850382038,"score_gpt":0.34952384025425437,"score_spread":0.307476511750434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286285386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05461037,0.009032876,0.014631523,0.16022542,0.0031212382,0.00019201342,0.00025033482,0.00031988462,0.7576163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6495738,0.0017513136,0.006196248,0.059840567,0.0007356967,0.00019240964,0.00013195639,0.00029583744,0.28128207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96864307,0.009455693,0.00072160794,0.004285955,0.008686288,0.008207378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980756,0.008616494,0.00085372094,0.00182295,0.005250684,0.002700163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020580115,0.0011295747,0.0013640515,0.002929023,0.06254224,0.020585641,0.006214916,0.01860678,0.018909182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033851817,0.00093991746,0.001772794,0.0027640343,0.03130358,0.008779822,0.01396563,0.01986376,0.002701451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048248996,0.000038168462,0.0019871374,0.00007732339,0.000084398824,0.0033471726,0.051641993,0.00036870007,0.00042054497,0.78549993,0.1359326,0.020553691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021905269,0.000045281424,0.0036113586,0.0005958037,0.000079570644,0.0023818868,0.058296606,0.0013735325,0.0008346272,0.10769035,0.82487017,0.00019882183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6067943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7663901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3932057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046951026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03970514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79104275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286572463","doi":"10.14288/1.0099115","title":"The records of lawyers : archival appraisal and access","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.022150634350634253,"score_gpt":0.2957925614677686,"score_spread":0.27364192711713436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286572463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7852948,0.0060658683,0.012074053,0.0053524054,0.0002688916,0.0012019442,0.0040964335,0.00023080519,0.18541488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9465251,0.005096044,0.018800555,0.00029035512,0.00025087578,0.00025139673,0.0015148913,0.0000821637,0.027188761],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411255,0.0019535138,0.000692043,0.00044325273,0.0024125942,0.00038598303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98073685,0.0074751815,0.00280148,0.0029257352,0.005499855,0.0005609673],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006574871,0.00019179123,0.00033882275,0.015054799,0.0033726643,0.008397514,0.0009122912,0.0007147824,0.00862704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034762803,0.0003590271,0.00018864343,0.016730264,0.002607826,0.0060914676,0.0045367195,0.0011563645,0.0011415244],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025767717,0.00016905062,0.11432366,0.00093200814,0.00004129382,0.0021818,0.44274697,0.00021236128,0.0051890616,0.042086534,0.011515437,0.38034412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019209672,0.00020193539,0.23882057,0.0013272447,0.00007677935,0.0024708605,0.46712092,0.0009543675,0.0044942456,0.011889775,0.27252793,0.00009608328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009021004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0198442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003611295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025088226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03477162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286924852","doi":"","title":"Skills Training in Clinical Legal Education: A Critical Approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Vision; Critical reflection; Legal practice; Legal profession; Politics; Legal research; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Empirical legal studies; Clinical Practice; Pedagogy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Law; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.08471902032025673,"score_gpt":0.4390076041773598,"score_spread":0.35428858385710305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286924852","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020611066,0.05534545,0.11933691,0.563112,0.0080876695,0.0009687056,0.00003582933,0.00014685401,0.23235552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7502594,0.040109064,0.10389112,0.07234691,0.0068997853,0.0023374173,0.000051156403,0.00013668156,0.0239685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810209,0.015198761,0.00041254467,0.00070898654,0.0019684364,0.0006903005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96087193,0.032756962,0.0012283685,0.0007608073,0.0026199897,0.0017619579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028780002,0.0010084901,0.00057712913,0.00571508,0.007644351,0.013273488,0.0027392467,0.0066115055,0.0023016536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026135677,0.00039538648,0.00042424898,0.0015744464,0.070542805,0.011783311,0.008577258,0.010461659,0.00037392357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009313091,0.0000691785,0.00022690243,0.00040817106,0.0000062223075,0.00029022314,0.043437168,0.00038315885,0.0001451641,0.92278534,0.010062476,0.022176638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002723206,0.000056993293,0.00025726386,0.002129422,0.0000068188133,0.00042744642,0.057725254,0.0006792874,0.0003985778,0.74622434,0.19204524,0.000022059017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024455658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002496525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028780002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012453329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01850416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15220499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287613873","doi":"10.1017/s1472669615000444","title":"The ‘Free Access to Law Movement’ in India: Supporting Legal Education, Research and Practice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Legal research; Promotion (chess); The Internet; Legislature; Public administration; Scholarship; Declaration; Public relations","score_opus":0.10613310999783904,"score_gpt":0.49179817023861355,"score_spread":0.3856650602407745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287613873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10041165,0.015331638,0.0064134477,0.14129977,0.0010087687,0.000318923,0.0006053839,0.0009279269,0.7336826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8630728,0.019192116,0.009884246,0.014408263,0.0011050679,0.00034210074,0.0007366214,0.00028219775,0.09097653],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400043,0.0018296879,0.00035860552,0.00030672687,0.0019596764,0.001545004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819287,0.009655438,0.0020081904,0.0015148255,0.0013836138,0.0035092973],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045927493,0.00028784553,0.0002968883,0.0055817594,0.009938914,0.014945533,0.0019457485,0.0024523234,0.016721025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01189298,0.0004845407,0.0003091381,0.008870361,0.009174988,0.007881053,0.016746124,0.0037359046,0.0031906064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037048412,0.0003136579,0.008600823,0.0011443247,0.000020884117,0.0014918632,0.07307809,0.00028598544,0.0012896829,0.39401892,0.1049279,0.41479084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009179682,0.00005374549,0.019861244,0.00078526896,0.000016256616,0.0006224329,0.028035153,0.0001898927,0.0005220765,0.016973825,0.9328766,0.000054398217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019864762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028651813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99805427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00793653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032972634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05758375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287653972","doi":"","title":"Fitness for Purpose: Mandatory Continuing Legal Ethics Education for Lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Legal profession; Legal education; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03186251192095178,"score_gpt":0.4108620655133253,"score_spread":0.37899955359237353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287653972","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22088616,0.001209179,0.007009784,0.48483458,0.0014055847,0.0005354847,0.00009544341,0.00038480607,0.283639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9181475,0.00020717307,0.006679333,0.045809668,0.00031580645,0.0001362528,0.000047967224,0.000031016465,0.028625207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936946,0.0014027986,0.00021971269,0.00037969102,0.002091761,0.0022114625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957922,0.016519574,0.0028256308,0.0017119271,0.007521145,0.013499828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006552177,0.00019599305,0.00023552666,0.0007941675,0.008048199,0.0052468292,0.0015495179,0.009157236,0.010361941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04814222,0.00023023371,0.000353333,0.00051719777,0.005213768,0.002596107,0.005096991,0.0051103337,0.001038038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015842197,0.001843474,0.038930345,0.0004889322,0.000027103008,0.0020128996,0.047561243,0.0006281829,0.0038227204,0.34977072,0.23038499,0.324371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032822366,0.0005642039,0.16199827,0.0016108518,0.000085166364,0.002386941,0.041754615,0.0031411839,0.0040797037,0.116114944,0.6677433,0.00019268427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1460865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45016652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1460865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012057323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07148912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2904724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289673374","doi":"","title":"La recherche en droit au Québec: Jalons pour une approche sociologique (Legal Research in Quebec: A Sociological Perspective)","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Concurrence; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.24712651577875402,"score_gpt":0.49793130288487497,"score_spread":0.250804787106121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289673374","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056767724,0.091571495,0.027879566,0.5610102,0.0040746117,0.00088557653,0.0018942418,0.0003861241,0.25553045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.641564,0.036412515,0.038471963,0.042794734,0.0007415629,0.0007084902,0.0006905702,0.00021007781,0.23840606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918726,0.0037407447,0.0004919239,0.00080740656,0.0021284656,0.0009589443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97160125,0.008808376,0.00085885194,0.00078709744,0.015994959,0.0019495317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014036248,0.0006643583,0.00068438135,0.005103371,0.014675579,0.011719882,0.002512632,0.0050211526,0.017760405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020561578,0.00047754307,0.0007015049,0.005957868,0.010542434,0.0047284723,0.0024222038,0.004377176,0.00076085835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011575723,0.000119401804,0.019504158,0.001786648,0.00008678742,0.0017723165,0.05557809,0.0032365655,0.001427333,0.5713614,0.17868458,0.16632706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003763285,0.0000880367,0.037022516,0.0041079405,0.00009588162,0.00032378448,0.050142508,0.0029472832,0.00084527046,0.029638441,0.8745848,0.00016597143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.846488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15351199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18490668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289772130","doi":"","title":"No Toilets in Park","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Curriculum; Sociology; Legal education; Pedagogy; Theme (computing); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016218718184735963,"score_gpt":0.35221655012777475,"score_spread":0.3359978319430388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289772130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20296429,0.00081024517,0.002034799,0.03448145,0.0009495691,0.00009443802,0.00030601976,0.00020885639,0.75815034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68231356,0.00060860463,0.0008231648,0.0035825227,0.00003749549,0.000037273872,0.0001402483,0.00007879824,0.3123783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987728,0.00019622793,0.00001520989,0.00014728068,0.00032474683,0.00054359966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990343,0.00010817783,0.00007392306,0.00004577734,0.00022559725,0.000512276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052985153,0.00015959768,0.0001401491,0.00027586054,0.0074332645,0.0036951746,0.00081985747,0.0008641227,0.024242122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021715052,0.00014258473,0.0001371234,0.00033282314,0.004100852,0.0022866228,0.0033698555,0.0020284497,0.0018592798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077189194,0.000125803,0.011502351,0.00019085982,0.000007819965,0.000742726,0.081154935,0.0003860397,0.002331687,0.46928844,0.29114816,0.143044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070394894,0.00006415304,0.007425111,0.000098529345,0.0000044704125,0.00018336534,0.030211445,0.0001411077,0.0006749492,0.005956173,0.9552143,0.00001935043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2809173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6386315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2809173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009955821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017653946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5585643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290199864","doi":"","title":"Ethical Lawyering Across Canada's Legal Traditions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal ethics; Legal realism; Legal pluralism; Law; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Legal history; Legal profession; Sociology; Empirical legal studies; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016023245609335605,"score_gpt":0.36018289232080103,"score_spread":0.34415964671146543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290199864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5650034,0.014572985,0.0035105315,0.11888147,0.0005587692,0.00016491067,0.00020975909,0.00010252865,0.2969957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790366,0.0018783594,0.001049341,0.004748158,0.00003138244,0.000020730262,0.000028197457,0.000014474374,0.013192752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909294,0.0016847798,0.00024253112,0.0009003556,0.0031054271,0.003137507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811085,0.004567802,0.0010973258,0.0005680267,0.0054599144,0.0071985107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007291614,0.00021153293,0.00042085315,0.0022957681,0.029364536,0.007818407,0.0020015265,0.001891447,0.0044179526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014352389,0.00036429768,0.00030577776,0.004037627,0.013824172,0.0018307563,0.006408082,0.0046143485,0.00014551236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010305531,0.00013303195,0.028281473,0.00036045612,0.000059274073,0.0013824964,0.21988083,0.0008846264,0.0010535247,0.5790233,0.026450258,0.14238761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000822816,0.000107209155,0.16404983,0.0013755973,0.00008605268,0.0006495257,0.23231763,0.0014627456,0.0007452703,0.037475195,0.56147105,0.00017757712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98499495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99516785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13695125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13695125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29368725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99365556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290983796","doi":"","title":"CLC Stream B : Legal and judicial profession : feature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"De Rebus","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Kingdom; Political science; Session (web analytics); Legal profession; Feature (linguistics); Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.018447519455180313,"score_gpt":0.3643204762693952,"score_spread":0.34587295681421487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290983796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004794712,0.0023969708,0.003509675,0.19077557,0.043902118,0.0033253757,0.0068140263,0.0027186559,0.7417629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007258967,0.0006457903,0.001050797,0.03947226,0.009435876,0.000546236,0.0019590391,0.00043577232,0.93919533],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697316,0.00027273054,0.00011694118,0.0002908034,0.0015569186,0.00078945124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907561,0.0011489798,0.0003420314,0.00042208724,0.0032911978,0.0040396713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054090824,0.0005223851,0.00055322325,0.0015063444,0.004481195,0.0076665967,0.0021962768,0.009846429,0.2494735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007870646,0.000552693,0.0006627991,0.0012977874,0.0014234545,0.0036821493,0.0038632294,0.005797451,0.09613623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023374203,0.00003500868,0.00018024507,0.000049550716,5.3517294e-7,0.000030344361,0.00004342299,0.000016144088,0.00016341721,0.0012281658,0.9868276,0.011402226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029889343,0.000042303356,0.0025135481,0.00008592298,0.0000013359038,0.000035846282,0.000116540614,0.00008647259,0.00019086056,0.00084723916,0.99604,0.00001007934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026923152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08904238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2494735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004394604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016740983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83457196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292446632","doi":"","title":"CORPORATE COUNSEL AS CORPORATE CONSCIENCE: ETHICS AND INTEGRITY IN THE POST-ENRON ERA","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Legal ethics; Confidentiality; Accountability; Interdependence; Corporate governance; Independence (probability theory); Professional conduct; Political science; Business; Public trust; Corporate law; Public relations; Professional responsibility; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.06382516744105722,"score_gpt":0.36770759977663375,"score_spread":0.30388243233557655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292446632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029971533,0.017691383,0.003948465,0.73595595,0.0013121389,0.000024926414,0.000018817995,0.00004291687,0.21103382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82957125,0.0057719396,0.002453983,0.08953147,0.0008484828,0.00003283438,0.000011860882,0.000039054765,0.071739055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810563,0.00830464,0.0003869557,0.00089682074,0.0063143377,0.0030409268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820374,0.008329374,0.0010494852,0.0007976003,0.004639683,0.003146473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018437643,0.00024187373,0.00040589774,0.001046814,0.02248197,0.021953486,0.0016607455,0.0146353645,0.0027031307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025165174,0.00026053074,0.00020315134,0.0012618713,0.070736796,0.008135614,0.005513406,0.012180298,0.0004573652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007215815,0.00001364714,0.0007036012,0.000020205513,0.0000023581233,0.0001805436,0.030748297,0.00010077891,0.000059211092,0.93960845,0.016111385,0.012444268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015944515,0.000025854328,0.0030026515,0.00041555395,0.000007211066,0.000357242,0.04736391,0.00043561286,0.00029332226,0.32528523,0.62274396,0.00005341403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41294917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58946395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41294917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040136132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0967405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82109106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293041762","doi":"","title":"The Globalization of Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Legal education; Curriculum; Political science; Legal research; Legal profession; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.00883824580175636,"score_gpt":0.33316624516737486,"score_spread":0.3243279993656185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293041762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07597747,0.0135916015,0.006816734,0.22491875,0.0016192376,0.00003537507,0.00018364118,0.00014336554,0.6767139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85983855,0.019113708,0.0051926174,0.044292465,0.0023162416,0.000072827606,0.000222595,0.00011232003,0.068838656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982344,0.0007763857,0.000041057174,0.00024320756,0.0003628665,0.00034210118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974717,0.00062239496,0.00035030794,0.0002758431,0.0004989358,0.00078084285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016044902,0.00019989525,0.00018174706,0.0010573,0.0026980399,0.0057202303,0.0003056591,0.0013706185,0.01693212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003667007,0.00015093079,0.00026403362,0.0013570667,0.0052859625,0.0042872103,0.0046035745,0.0027177886,0.0010131283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016520065,0.00005702236,0.005867659,0.00010805505,0.000009510808,0.00016541766,0.008177519,0.00028363295,0.00048305656,0.82940245,0.052831754,0.10259734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007941439,0.000036988207,0.014744638,0.00034544535,0.0000068338936,0.00015548978,0.006967226,0.00031917455,0.00020320674,0.11906054,0.8581347,0.000017814915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071723447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008943148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01693212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004533742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060036695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056643605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293451274","doi":"","title":"Use of Electronic Appeal Transcripts in the Alberta Court of Appeal","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03880758510275726,"score_gpt":0.3646939187647742,"score_spread":0.3258863336620169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293451274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17573969,0.0011022487,0.04913664,0.056356113,0.0044329003,0.0047763935,0.002792439,0.004768538,0.700895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49459365,0.00084530335,0.053222135,0.013688719,0.00095214875,0.0019534589,0.0016664786,0.0005788108,0.4324993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97670376,0.006454484,0.0008221457,0.0012818993,0.012407136,0.0023305207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9573368,0.025448194,0.0010708807,0.0039265193,0.010261964,0.001955586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023664968,0.00039195226,0.0003861963,0.0028991206,0.012082006,0.007957714,0.0027055924,0.003220339,0.03743024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055681527,0.0010967039,0.00040638205,0.0033879846,0.0041100467,0.0026365747,0.004647547,0.004476184,0.008266049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064326177,0.00056993286,0.009085828,0.00024889043,0.000026227275,0.0037637048,0.016644292,0.001587237,0.00972832,0.08151882,0.46679133,0.40939212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062346004,0.00068340445,0.052026063,0.0006468616,0.00008963213,0.0014777116,0.024751673,0.008508717,0.0110356705,0.021250319,0.8783834,0.0005230677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35351822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72871107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64648175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015269836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038366262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70292103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293459718","doi":"10.14288/1.0076763","title":"The lawyer as advisor : advocate, judge or… friend?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.01504776243645802,"score_gpt":0.2530450633208249,"score_spread":0.23799730088436685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293459718","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058289557,0.013386392,0.001297513,0.546631,0.016666258,0.000061858744,0.00017097576,0.0004644249,0.41549268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09217315,0.011766234,0.002491836,0.08692931,0.0064818305,0.000070081085,0.00014744989,0.00024420727,0.7996959],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989761,0.00045848184,0.00004371159,0.000080592974,0.00023224007,0.00020888304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956055,0.00098414,0.00021468662,0.00009194015,0.00040749335,0.0026962066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017166849,0.00021459516,0.00027978438,0.000508541,0.0032913834,0.005763462,0.0006332114,0.0044219834,0.14221686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007853016,0.00022489789,0.00009950811,0.0006224574,0.0017915409,0.004891128,0.0022815047,0.0030285923,0.041212473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014471325,0.000053589705,0.0005245355,0.000066038534,0.0000012426788,0.00017954301,0.001078505,0.000009171485,0.00009769426,0.0052045006,0.92298937,0.06978135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012357654,0.000018068273,0.00090952765,0.00021708192,0.0000027904482,0.0002573628,0.0050179283,0.000044436183,0.000050384206,0.0020595177,0.9914029,0.000007726256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071936753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05298006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14221686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002034544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036529433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47576278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295142193","doi":"10.29173/alr780","title":"Implications of Case Management and Active Adjudication for Judicial Disqualification","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Apprehension; Intervention (counseling); Settlement (finance); Political science; Judicial review; Judicial discretion; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.09939715226642387,"score_gpt":0.4640134142753247,"score_spread":0.36461626200890085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295142193","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010074736,0.028895706,0.006380608,0.88528293,0.004582953,0.00020089299,0.00006958505,0.000046473546,0.06446628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6175062,0.020824999,0.016837947,0.31708008,0.007861416,0.0004080627,0.00007331828,0.00010318898,0.019304687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8281543,0.08618947,0.0075654676,0.009849686,0.05226197,0.01597905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7779841,0.16151232,0.008300961,0.0061219037,0.038734265,0.007346484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13406014,0.00058799033,0.000873032,0.0043058577,0.02311406,0.014550525,0.008037342,0.013340536,0.0033357718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27068824,0.0007751875,0.0016322014,0.0035131974,0.039435845,0.008212132,0.005552494,0.020390654,0.00044994676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006951421,0.00004033139,0.001723999,0.0004667393,0.000029058061,0.00049035717,0.0113610625,0.0006197747,0.0002604948,0.8624956,0.06494208,0.057501014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024378489,0.00010365523,0.013216238,0.0063495827,0.00014525554,0.00061383535,0.01746769,0.002534985,0.00080964866,0.34819525,0.61008346,0.00023664773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73817194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8630062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26182806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111634545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21163024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8099691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295867102","doi":"","title":"'I Am Not a Caped Crusader': Clinical Legal Education and Professional Identity Formation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Legal education; Political science; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07657239234425363,"score_gpt":0.4719044302973549,"score_spread":0.3953320379531013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295867102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5421768,0.0016850457,0.0010977058,0.28932676,0.0008608349,0.00005804908,0.000041385516,0.000022382947,0.16473104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876345,0.0003230946,0.00016972829,0.004738014,0.000076560114,0.00002034663,0.00000925802,0.000011067083,0.007017543],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867595,0.009000342,0.00021181237,0.00068032974,0.0013310737,0.002016929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96483153,0.018675938,0.0037417728,0.0009926092,0.002221918,0.00953633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015199051,0.00014643533,0.0003620669,0.0014673622,0.015015523,0.0129581755,0.00192191,0.0055832625,0.019433228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07571038,0.00034053987,0.00026625718,0.0012733211,0.0218528,0.008713946,0.009247453,0.008874001,0.0010958966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016920627,0.0007940342,0.056143302,0.00007692724,0.000018737384,0.0013584746,0.5514004,0.00007630973,0.000114364106,0.30339113,0.026521793,0.05993534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008720671,0.000093147566,0.039303213,0.00033569135,0.000028813201,0.0009093234,0.8382951,0.00030330135,0.00018040792,0.082438104,0.037980095,0.000045575827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026964571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039892808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026964571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007067295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027677841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080381215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296416967","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1358","title":"Measuring the Effects of Feminist Legal Research: Looking Critically at \"Failure\" and \"Success\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Scholarship; Relation (database); Knowledge production; Point (geometry); Epistemology; Feminism; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07389473532086727,"score_gpt":0.39302807172815774,"score_spread":0.31913333640729047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296416967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45647103,0.018384187,0.0149662355,0.21407002,0.0015412515,0.00040910376,0.000554079,0.000102414786,0.29350173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98662204,0.0017725278,0.0023126246,0.0050821556,0.0004960613,0.0002643083,0.00004475303,0.00007181168,0.0033336873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7742353,0.17982998,0.003779537,0.0038948779,0.0347322,0.003528084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.22712244,0.71053696,0.02516023,0.009143866,0.02440566,0.0036308016],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13602246,0.0008987054,0.0011258181,0.006359631,0.0072828215,0.01603552,0.0032395856,0.003575079,0.0051115393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40084103,0.00060354744,0.00061792665,0.005308757,0.054756403,0.020486185,0.010763198,0.008721079,0.00076301664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000494505,0.0004052532,0.08746809,0.00236445,0.0003715161,0.00043260845,0.28820282,0.0010604423,0.0009894491,0.5042547,0.020046806,0.09390934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001656462,0.0012535666,0.15219437,0.0049618115,0.0005825641,0.00039443249,0.39492187,0.002141292,0.008435984,0.3052742,0.12947464,0.0001997065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004066289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052326084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0109594315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008548375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71936417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296563645","doi":"","title":"To Make a Difference","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Scholarship; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.024858577219946144,"score_gpt":0.3764989386513703,"score_spread":0.35164036143142413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296563645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013372798,0.008073925,0.0023763445,0.8666583,0.028316088,0.000025247082,0.00009074205,0.00019393874,0.09292816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045830913,0.006995417,0.0036376452,0.76031685,0.008893527,0.00009197236,0.00016927699,0.00047450553,0.17358996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985753,0.0046244375,0.00042917475,0.0022847082,0.004677311,0.0022314896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97992307,0.0040599867,0.00090524,0.0027446903,0.0061764843,0.006190484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010289831,0.001013713,0.0008822158,0.0013816785,0.009518546,0.016619716,0.002324186,0.011626094,0.04540333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034602605,0.00036733015,0.00084264996,0.00085808785,0.021835115,0.0252819,0.010420083,0.02260989,0.032101374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004423161,0.00007527983,0.00091177644,0.00014261712,0.000032918324,0.00011977231,0.005621046,0.00006268583,0.00030285536,0.2654379,0.6793409,0.04790805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001312698,0.000025398342,0.00023565094,0.00021467764,0.000008805847,0.000120631885,0.004051796,0.000036613535,0.00013245079,0.056019016,0.9391212,0.000020680118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011180319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0151367625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04540333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005596123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012778819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15188926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298823781","doi":"","title":"Book Note: Preventive Justice, by Andrew Ashworth & Lucia Zedner","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03816903943832534,"score_gpt":0.3751420251431837,"score_spread":0.33697298570485834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298823781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013486682,0.079945795,0.0004253852,0.79101133,0.09077518,0.000060002803,0.0002462847,0.00006203592,0.03733907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019606305,0.046366483,0.0006054437,0.5483695,0.08405513,0.00015776158,0.00018458211,0.00013898595,0.31816143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837047,0.00039540158,0.00010890128,0.00027276503,0.0007457305,0.000106732215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99202865,0.0049904115,0.000161772,0.00022621773,0.0019359683,0.000656984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031466924,0.0011666757,0.0012693609,0.0018684603,0.005377169,0.00617569,0.0021634086,0.016421916,0.018385388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012997769,0.00095458573,0.0007335942,0.0019576754,0.003987596,0.006352662,0.0019570785,0.0154984165,0.0122434255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016528276,0.0000031031007,0.000014744591,0.000013109847,8.0683697e-7,0.0000053565504,0.000023968032,0.000007860775,0.000006401043,0.0008639287,0.99659795,0.0024610332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009336439,0.000006028897,0.0003180255,0.00016488707,0.0000042837105,0.00003738759,0.00014943615,0.00003249139,0.000017035094,0.0035105613,0.9957397,0.000010878945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06839667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23292336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06839667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051931534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007399314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13599718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299081848","doi":"","title":"Rehabilitate and punish: discursive braiding within debates for lowering the minimum age of criminal responsibility in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal responsibility; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Criminal law","score_opus":0.025201454232345925,"score_gpt":0.28897387945677955,"score_spread":0.2637724252244336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299081848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1887211,0.0067503164,0.0030809382,0.66501456,0.001970819,0.00012260053,0.00014556965,0.000062494255,0.13413164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9203841,0.0016435281,0.0011302701,0.050699122,0.00022392617,0.00006372565,0.000031901123,0.00008759513,0.025735857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97340953,0.0060190004,0.00094525155,0.0024783653,0.005330635,0.01181724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9512833,0.018482339,0.0021370563,0.0011073002,0.013578446,0.01341159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01838773,0.00065687817,0.0012010519,0.0023377591,0.0799331,0.02723275,0.007936177,0.020815557,0.007176104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05908525,0.0011468203,0.0008019735,0.0029209936,0.041223403,0.007135671,0.012517406,0.042220872,0.00033417472],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012326562,0.000109849054,0.009076491,0.0002196673,0.00007142808,0.0007829321,0.27950335,0.0012549122,0.0005029537,0.5847565,0.09290436,0.030694216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008604641,0.00008220086,0.02236767,0.0010959718,0.00015457395,0.00025053558,0.41516662,0.0022535692,0.0012138453,0.065577306,0.4912808,0.0004708549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99448836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99754226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24667083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24667083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.50399995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8737551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299800824","doi":"","title":"The Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Encyclopedia; Philosophy of law; Subject (documents); Law; Globe; Cover (algebra); Political philosophy; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Comparative law; Engineering; Library science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.028906042041283116,"score_gpt":0.35994556595702787,"score_spread":0.33103952391574476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299800824","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013309843,0.6016618,0.0061621643,0.011461145,0.013673119,0.00017420219,0.005518892,0.0014577706,0.35855994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012985769,0.7363724,0.01421224,0.010959523,0.009536239,0.00064477895,0.007832082,0.001159152,0.20629774],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989819,0.00017116635,0.00020040538,0.000112836766,0.00043317582,0.00010056825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855095,0.00070610945,0.000104117826,0.00012008051,0.00034028388,0.00017840845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007101708,0.0013009167,0.0013183746,0.012847555,0.0014932163,0.008204993,0.0011117783,0.0013984791,0.069165684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022285192,0.00059742195,0.0005204786,0.022095755,0.0014860216,0.0067229318,0.0024517798,0.002781113,0.033152875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000194344,0.000045260385,0.00016704132,0.0018600299,0.000017144584,0.000093948016,0.00046344733,0.00017213977,0.0004232322,0.019084781,0.8342495,0.14340402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020174537,0.0000039149404,0.00033794873,0.00067280506,0.0000031843965,0.00010010684,0.000130434,0.000024016294,0.000029455026,0.0031315447,0.99555993,0.000004557063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020039892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038891493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069165684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023463827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003912922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23138225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299835984","doi":"","title":"Defining Access to Justice: The Charter and the Courts (and the Law Commission of Ontario)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Commission; Law; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.06012035141865464,"score_gpt":0.33140635452712414,"score_spread":0.2712860031084695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299835984","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08576065,0.024639308,0.0047343755,0.5841986,0.0016764373,0.00024840335,0.0012957259,0.00006886626,0.2973776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8294109,0.0093752965,0.0051354947,0.029119631,0.00083703944,0.00018787869,0.0002332244,0.00014551962,0.125555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864029,0.0026522884,0.0007141554,0.0012772349,0.005063555,0.003889902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799951,0.006392067,0.0016042619,0.000877413,0.0068562157,0.0042750244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011143315,0.00042695447,0.000706884,0.0023578014,0.023411844,0.0195424,0.0023355025,0.010859035,0.007599606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033011276,0.00077873986,0.0005573111,0.0041241036,0.032169357,0.01090096,0.006635399,0.008854475,0.0003950043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031525422,0.000014771285,0.0043038707,0.00010025095,0.000014059714,0.00014368205,0.026206953,0.00025662998,0.00014034293,0.8977685,0.05705899,0.013960355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058947266,0.000033602042,0.038700692,0.0009105116,0.00007171266,0.00012169893,0.028057985,0.00063716597,0.0003060862,0.232304,0.6985385,0.0002590958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8294061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17059393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31070155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96199346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300395326","doi":"","title":"Taillefer: Disclosure, Guilty Please and Ethics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Pleading; Law; Plea; Legal ethics; Supreme court; Political science; Presumption of innocence","score_opus":0.043356684335679394,"score_gpt":0.3814595483077474,"score_spread":0.338102863972068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300395326","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032942582,0.030813105,0.0019426086,0.5369601,0.0012676978,0.000047681075,0.00010596057,0.00007345009,0.39584684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6473065,0.022094337,0.0018336682,0.18884611,0.0011003279,0.00004855578,0.000048814112,0.000069829824,0.13865182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99238825,0.0018387347,0.00017009968,0.00042427602,0.003326272,0.0018523213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992922,0.0039670975,0.00053922145,0.00020350731,0.0016768873,0.0006912973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004594956,0.00030682437,0.00028853162,0.0010152173,0.016857317,0.008428812,0.0012913512,0.012139751,0.0054194513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015050233,0.00025097062,0.00025632125,0.0015414453,0.026685715,0.0027484256,0.0027101405,0.007866786,0.00050432945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002838243,0.000027697995,0.0030331986,0.00009631182,0.000007673235,0.0025547892,0.026949946,0.00025654244,0.00018056815,0.77642304,0.15838891,0.032053076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021048798,0.00003670671,0.00927892,0.0011007793,0.000026651094,0.0031250718,0.042067505,0.0005997729,0.0005580889,0.14746834,0.7955896,0.00012750445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84332377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9095738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84332377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043154176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05809297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31519783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300502709","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1331622","title":"Banned from Lawyering: Gordon Martin, Communist","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Communism; Political science; Economic history; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02030866571212508,"score_gpt":0.34582049669557674,"score_spread":0.32551183098345166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300502709","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017719208,0.007829846,0.00012697444,0.9753331,0.0068341433,0.000007788705,0.00001864796,0.000017196022,0.008060356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034639955,0.006095303,0.00024912204,0.8832039,0.008139051,0.00004230063,0.000022826835,0.00006716279,0.06754037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933615,0.0016778215,0.000303055,0.001103239,0.0020860753,0.0014683371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828015,0.008624502,0.0010164857,0.00050379947,0.0022279655,0.0048256502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007331171,0.0005240419,0.0009770823,0.0007788824,0.015382896,0.006678917,0.0027173932,0.036684595,0.010149298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034614343,0.00076264417,0.00046670437,0.0006173477,0.009370866,0.0064297533,0.004322863,0.039780833,0.0025856108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000378383,0.000072563096,0.0008429673,0.00007239906,0.000013549893,0.0002473913,0.002058492,0.00006182812,0.00017716276,0.02366096,0.9588164,0.013938399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006915382,0.000045649518,0.0040390715,0.0005365783,0.000024228442,0.00041424335,0.004532201,0.00018040568,0.00042827576,0.011663691,0.97799075,0.00007584509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05016564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1483908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05016564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005212707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017849917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0997473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301169550","doi":"10.5040/9781472560247.ch-014","title":"Shifting Paradigms of Parochialism : Lessons for Legal Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parochialism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0771406515421187,"score_gpt":0.37059185981372506,"score_spread":0.29345120827160637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301169550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016082266,0.036372226,0.022969002,0.32502136,0.0028682142,0.000087372995,0.000036806403,0.00020640569,0.59635633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7113042,0.044368587,0.027541736,0.038702305,0.002363745,0.0005331843,0.000095203875,0.000367823,0.17472327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974692,0.0018260983,0.000041692194,0.00015207236,0.00027736844,0.00023345563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732286,0.001667304,0.00010722775,0.000169767,0.00024464985,0.00048819976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004388147,0.00050807564,0.0005182664,0.0008773119,0.008156878,0.0092537245,0.0017473492,0.0035121243,0.009420766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004911701,0.00040421763,0.00042969603,0.00088955305,0.034014955,0.016170932,0.0053426963,0.012883696,0.0017741008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076048914,0.000048959213,0.00018485685,0.00009784865,0.0000017762376,0.0001197041,0.032406986,0.00012362223,0.000062619605,0.896404,0.037452362,0.03308966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000118673115,0.000017794433,0.00021939742,0.00063998374,0.000002176836,0.00016357604,0.04347451,0.00030579764,0.000094269184,0.59872943,0.3563282,0.000013075012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061441283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013605866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009420766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00894718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007505024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06491661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301452080","doi":"","title":"Making the Common Good Common","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections Canadian Journal of Music","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.16638333527002278,"score_gpt":0.3935733161518743,"score_spread":0.22718998088185152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301452080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016418261,0.002636598,0.04900455,0.15775043,0.002954761,0.0001962439,0.0001659056,0.00029847605,0.77057475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8065975,0.0018633105,0.022909367,0.03061201,0.0011443769,0.00027479234,0.00020765403,0.0004773517,0.13591366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.952173,0.020885248,0.001812392,0.0072965776,0.012463262,0.0053694844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95020133,0.010445616,0.0023756807,0.015967747,0.013686845,0.0073227608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028172145,0.0010864731,0.0015931899,0.0054180613,0.024783771,0.032544456,0.0038611144,0.013497749,0.02781901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054385524,0.0013533604,0.0020150237,0.003332693,0.07972406,0.030378778,0.025177289,0.0154161835,0.0047658407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016543956,0.000024201365,0.0005236002,0.00005533712,0.000031145366,0.00012443078,0.0085333465,0.00020564297,0.00021208014,0.9571408,0.020838594,0.012294209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018955083,0.000029055467,0.00066694734,0.0003820976,0.00005934657,0.000119573706,0.011987034,0.00027498396,0.0004196129,0.65712106,0.32886332,0.000057987843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048152186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06965996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048152186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019896716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039722238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14899033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301507077","doi":"","title":"The Accreditation of Trinity Western University's Law Program","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Law; Accreditation; Legal profession; Sociology; Political science; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.05410614306659953,"score_gpt":0.38297635560883336,"score_spread":0.3288702125422338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301507077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07509832,0.0016292407,0.0025334207,0.10816861,0.008323395,0.00075985334,0.0008275222,0.0014194223,0.80124027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15371627,0.00055040803,0.002673254,0.012687794,0.00072059187,0.0004161006,0.0006812891,0.00027061446,0.8282837],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99381435,0.00058941316,0.0002746412,0.0005052863,0.0023717273,0.0024446112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97371167,0.0017550433,0.0008192121,0.0014537844,0.006731825,0.015528394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046110996,0.00036324796,0.00035924467,0.0018731377,0.008021648,0.0048344657,0.001582247,0.0029350952,0.09642874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015513921,0.0006746687,0.0003743835,0.0009994978,0.0028963457,0.0022337863,0.0059191724,0.004972813,0.012411136],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005653639,0.0002765181,0.011699697,0.00019644007,0.00000888444,0.0006211586,0.0017343647,0.00012336418,0.0011871033,0.06410575,0.82349855,0.09649163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003067226,0.00016569032,0.0386769,0.00028001136,0.0000062763334,0.0003108934,0.0011619196,0.00031106366,0.00070901884,0.001910836,0.9563795,0.000057358764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12532818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3749618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010009875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05151663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32258624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301725652","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1222","title":"The Cost of Uncertainty: Navigating the Boundary Between Legal Information and Legal Services in the Access to Justice Sector","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Disadvantaged; CLARITY; Business; Variety (cybernetics); Public relations; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.048241454563298536,"score_gpt":0.4264439621798989,"score_spread":0.37820250761660035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301725652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57501394,0.0038393748,0.031853896,0.18034385,0.0002560756,0.0002797316,0.000073330164,0.00005377084,0.20828605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951255,0.0005111815,0.0022397614,0.0012921748,0.000028762284,0.00006594347,0.000004642781,0.000013240869,0.00071893167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.950736,0.037455115,0.0009679404,0.001079521,0.0050278935,0.0047334917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9015099,0.08297809,0.0056874207,0.0017268921,0.004071196,0.00402646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03245428,0.00036662538,0.00077325007,0.0033044256,0.02172817,0.030498208,0.0028059634,0.007491291,0.004805981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09160256,0.0009004359,0.00050129276,0.0027483003,0.048160985,0.026403576,0.022810351,0.008196573,0.00025912415],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097607684,0.0001362244,0.00927633,0.00020662442,0.00003215529,0.0017250985,0.20652623,0.0021900095,0.00032628071,0.74004275,0.0027654518,0.036675222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031954005,0.000095382384,0.006106761,0.0010400297,0.000053569354,0.0006335654,0.4685407,0.0045829257,0.00052339776,0.48809433,0.030183386,0.00011393708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03686946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038098935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03686946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021215584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025043985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1716367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302325230","doi":"","title":"Institutionalizing Access to Justice: Judicial, Legislative and Grassroots Dimensions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Grassroots; Economic Justice; Political science; Supreme court; Doctrine; Law; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05312378472713806,"score_gpt":0.42985094120303646,"score_spread":0.3767271564758984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302325230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1213066,0.007271986,0.0438534,0.13599111,0.0004700104,0.0003665143,0.00004879866,0.00017102544,0.6905206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98419225,0.0010212291,0.002907056,0.0034754134,0.00017490958,0.00011296781,0.000009282164,0.00002763974,0.008079268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.971209,0.015062251,0.0007450477,0.0016723333,0.0047018817,0.006609538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664955,0.021803902,0.0028990712,0.0022950158,0.0020285118,0.004478016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023542192,0.00032785672,0.00064552523,0.0032882316,0.011353324,0.024360487,0.0027923777,0.008042106,0.0064893207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031503417,0.0005085904,0.0005428197,0.0030997614,0.0615028,0.01300955,0.015290587,0.006962625,0.000414279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042986117,0.000046254467,0.0007233035,0.000035701734,0.000007462458,0.00009972126,0.006998808,0.00032112442,0.0001610936,0.98229754,0.0010309985,0.008273643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000416432,0.00008221178,0.0036260413,0.0003923212,0.00002759844,0.00011665242,0.018558048,0.0011757363,0.0005621656,0.90627587,0.06909621,0.000045417204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014794565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02579563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024360487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01572892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030542238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12450451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302541037","doi":"","title":"An Introduction to David Wexler, the Person Behind Therapeutic Jurisprudence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Sociology; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Jurisprudence; Law; Field (mathematics); Miami; General partnership; Mental health; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.0255163579905696,"score_gpt":0.3646001503885506,"score_spread":0.339083792397981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302541037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048001576,0.31495818,0.0060074283,0.4824974,0.024112025,0.00010351958,0.0002535612,0.00014740316,0.16712028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13759361,0.29852384,0.012266968,0.22555114,0.043175157,0.0005190669,0.00040781012,0.00034327141,0.28161904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982309,0.0009951146,0.00006918506,0.00014571397,0.0004085913,0.00015049995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774736,0.0016280515,0.0001441396,0.00004825738,0.00024035355,0.00019174773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014895152,0.0006655504,0.00045341946,0.0018923897,0.0050768037,0.00415203,0.0010512157,0.0027996795,0.0068123247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050247866,0.00033706398,0.00028992552,0.0019537609,0.0073208925,0.0055181794,0.002438307,0.006523432,0.0017537836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011859637,0.000045436973,0.0003743931,0.000253214,0.0000038551248,0.00019926009,0.014230355,0.0000807324,0.0001350749,0.24381647,0.70983917,0.031010248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035545816,0.0000081280805,0.00038750304,0.00039500062,0.0000017946937,0.0001679671,0.004365105,0.000039839757,0.000037754577,0.027011685,0.9675751,0.0000065547074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085261725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014812466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0085261725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041390005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003642121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030030727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2304994647","doi":"","title":"Is this Toronto’s rudest lawyer?; Joseph Groia lost his appeal on Monday to overturn a finding of ‘incivility’ against him for his defence of a Bre-X geologist. Are lawyers increasingly crossing the line between zealous advocacy and downright rudeness?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geologist; Appeal; Law; Sociology; Management; Criminology; Engineering; Political science; History; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.09496085033656788,"score_gpt":0.3910978892245299,"score_spread":0.29613703888796206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2304994647","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041689225,0.0063198875,0.0004227571,0.9267977,0.0057048835,0.000014591052,0.00019054393,0.000080241225,0.056300618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1684564,0.0042239786,0.0008770071,0.3509117,0.0021294565,0.000026177675,0.00015364241,0.00021664937,0.47300503],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982364,0.00033036922,0.000035900914,0.000288515,0.000646862,0.0004618585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960692,0.0010035548,0.00014915154,0.00010072031,0.0010541249,0.0016232413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017992475,0.00036279598,0.00033736406,0.0007027287,0.01837865,0.011738542,0.0012335359,0.0101528,0.028596425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009986054,0.00047835926,0.00024789828,0.00061996485,0.007112315,0.003549472,0.0019682092,0.013025516,0.003885591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001808704,0.000008361723,0.0012955036,0.000030640917,0.000009331976,0.00032801926,0.0060657365,0.00002895029,0.00018386303,0.024436167,0.9608563,0.0067389775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061987935,0.000009155721,0.0026147263,0.000065662185,0.0000074430795,0.00014627515,0.0135182515,0.00006868376,0.00023918545,0.0032945087,0.97999245,0.000037460883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5628303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8320469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43716967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020778976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012422971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87948847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305226740","doi":"","title":"The State We’re In: Legal Education in Canada’s New Political Economy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Politics; Political science; Political economy; Economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03209552266601141,"score_gpt":0.369878876667491,"score_spread":0.3377833540014796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305226740","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20129079,0.0039655296,0.0013780189,0.5597203,0.0008660798,0.00007549498,0.0003701377,0.00007416198,0.23225953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88993007,0.0013616986,0.00073268276,0.022207495,0.00014395948,0.00002423346,0.000077947756,0.000037823207,0.08548409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462986,0.0006812713,0.00007096025,0.00029403172,0.0013643338,0.0029594768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908047,0.0015679353,0.00029971966,0.00013353498,0.0020240864,0.005169967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032385143,0.00023284639,0.000371894,0.0015111673,0.029001543,0.015796395,0.0017899259,0.0063694916,0.015975973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011544702,0.00040688328,0.00042305418,0.0021882087,0.011724157,0.00414975,0.0042161103,0.010686697,0.0006360151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086315624,0.00015372536,0.018233242,0.000108172404,0.000029038254,0.00054647925,0.03669176,0.0019678462,0.00041583387,0.7377457,0.15258057,0.051441364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087085646,0.00005402095,0.05036921,0.0003815376,0.000059051446,0.00011779338,0.064107604,0.0031495967,0.00077315397,0.0628594,0.8178663,0.00017520759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99539137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99851495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77760357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22239642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41964766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90190995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305818085","doi":"","title":"bio.legal LLP: An Alternative to Outside Legal Counsel and Full Time In-House Counsel","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Right to counsel; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.025622851021442298,"score_gpt":0.28186889981318897,"score_spread":0.2562460487917467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305818085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024983825,0.0006845883,0.011756278,0.04270072,0.0005788213,0.0004038701,0.0002669342,0.0010987954,0.9175262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32543862,0.0005894709,0.02291976,0.026814703,0.00050065975,0.00043485628,0.0002746698,0.00035970836,0.6226675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99550843,0.001029637,0.00009242029,0.0004123533,0.0018125334,0.0011446538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929149,0.0015213313,0.00032054124,0.0008785892,0.00074663205,0.003617996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030778253,0.00028766337,0.00023210586,0.0016415352,0.009448666,0.0061258604,0.0024549938,0.0060248408,0.093182035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067734485,0.0005020588,0.0003223821,0.0011530377,0.0034989915,0.0035365229,0.0066676745,0.004992805,0.012111175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016039512,0.0007209291,0.0039750244,0.00013239963,0.000014083945,0.0017233719,0.0052923122,0.0003066394,0.0028588804,0.2266834,0.43928996,0.31884262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000133452,0.00016747319,0.007291638,0.00014922589,0.00001555628,0.0016941233,0.0047417535,0.0009854737,0.0010754135,0.014465269,0.96922094,0.00005978329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072936475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2738917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093182035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004526023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021386854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31172496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305914159","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511610394.001","title":"Preface","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05117445743945812,"score_gpt":0.2871295792726475,"score_spread":0.23595512183318937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305914159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012335721,0.012776753,0.004793266,0.021656215,0.07755931,0.0003363755,0.006470064,0.0012006484,0.8739737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0072143804,0.006473988,0.002364399,0.005607022,0.0133953225,0.00021887259,0.0057557123,0.00078363693,0.95818657],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993388,0.00009699575,0.000044108216,0.00013095206,0.00033737908,0.000051827104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969119,0.0005589849,0.00013179053,0.00025837362,0.0016756565,0.00046332547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008243376,0.00090597384,0.00075874844,0.0020817253,0.0024133332,0.004047756,0.0012685717,0.001259324,0.43618006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006375497,0.0003058862,0.00040683014,0.0016167808,0.0006814149,0.003143474,0.0016503196,0.0035387385,0.26266992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012977858,0.000015675603,0.00005352517,0.000082762854,9.182398e-7,0.000042723586,0.0001310346,0.000041221017,0.00008917574,0.006563022,0.95933384,0.033633087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012619403,0.000007750134,0.00011355346,0.00009567314,5.6015034e-7,0.00005510455,0.00006252136,0.000016377486,0.0000337427,0.0015480496,0.998063,0.0000024253425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022286887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028716486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43618006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002284174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016284023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310463007","doi":"10.59962/9780774831000-011","title":"A New Wave of Access to Justice Reform in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.05371875538461471,"score_gpt":0.2645532948549393,"score_spread":0.21083453947032457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310463007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055260476,0.016042713,0.001375847,0.1761331,0.0013916336,0.00009882302,0.00064618984,0.00013909668,0.7489121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52559906,0.00842844,0.0011299573,0.023770673,0.0003398576,0.000052425632,0.00021264704,0.00013257937,0.44033444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99405575,0.00042782267,0.00006808037,0.00031689508,0.002288387,0.002842979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638027,0.00053180294,0.00009113368,0.00015191983,0.0013510734,0.0014938043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017103083,0.00040167477,0.00062932627,0.0021601378,0.020597037,0.016351575,0.0017007525,0.0062426613,0.02226027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007492567,0.0005225978,0.00047612155,0.00491828,0.011677265,0.003680598,0.004455783,0.00819365,0.00086002296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035463363,0.00005302891,0.0019502684,0.00010071837,0.000018273753,0.0003513139,0.014130165,0.000703024,0.00024683593,0.7333795,0.19109853,0.05793294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024162828,0.00001654913,0.0077527133,0.00025841387,0.000020462283,0.00007667749,0.009934287,0.0007246799,0.00017248669,0.034119617,0.9468363,0.00006363915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78421074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21578926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40961495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9095733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315304205","doi":"10.1061/40754(183)116","title":"Canadian Construction Claim Tracker: An Integrated Repository System for Canadian Case-Law Construction Claims","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Arbitration; Negotiation; Categorization; Computer science; Construction contract; Law; Dispute resolution; Compromise; Artificial intelligence; Business; Political science; Contract management","score_opus":0.025346501351866384,"score_gpt":0.3179735148097086,"score_spread":0.2926270134578422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315304205","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048935734,0.0016822945,0.29435423,0.0031944162,0.0003597734,0.0055292505,0.35410333,0.22725919,0.06458183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1471679,0.0018437449,0.45735297,0.00037650665,0.00019254642,0.0024316553,0.35876593,0.005284476,0.026584256],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993568,0.00056971004,0.0011439731,0.000986047,0.0033878835,0.00034442637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952494,0.0080457395,0.0040475624,0.009168958,0.023216577,0.003027129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011967676,0.0013768367,0.0017464411,0.040928807,0.004174054,0.0068080635,0.0052915644,0.0013047918,0.024769058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035163607,0.001220561,0.0010057277,0.030348208,0.0010501562,0.006250363,0.0046370476,0.0011933288,0.010132673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077224564,0.0003473679,0.0412346,0.0010271887,0.00017676996,0.00081753114,0.0033773193,0.005557049,0.0051881135,0.018677482,0.40543443,0.51738995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004011677,0.00014577567,0.06324788,0.0007401194,0.00030858297,0.0010125083,0.0017559916,0.14280221,0.014298234,0.011427272,0.7629128,0.00094746164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5991598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60916466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9844388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01556122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042648893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8064017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315807730","doi":"10.1097/01.eem.0000326307.73112.d6","title":"Articles from the 2006 LLSA Reading List","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emergency Medicine News","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14004046675451232,"score_gpt":0.41491459959289323,"score_spread":0.2748741328383809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315807730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00071580545,0.009184631,0.0009893293,0.021193273,0.10353568,0.00041681508,0.01044048,0.0016965726,0.8518275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011756069,0.0044182087,0.00048225926,0.0051673506,0.012178363,0.00009311135,0.0047132303,0.0003343677,0.9714376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992887,0.000060863145,0.000066114975,0.00007589654,0.00042457267,0.000083818704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953759,0.0004885413,0.0002626891,0.00016557597,0.0026270277,0.0010803438],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006207698,0.0013493347,0.0010342366,0.0039378116,0.0012487259,0.004582154,0.0011194944,0.0019980168,0.7412019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005494478,0.00041530194,0.00071992533,0.003118926,0.00037716515,0.0022963742,0.0020253363,0.0018062055,0.6927378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016338847,0.000018534161,0.00006539081,0.00013322927,0.0000011958459,0.00003155041,0.0000052100418,0.000014269737,0.000053001117,0.00018476903,0.9591939,0.040282514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068628424,0.000013846344,0.00037973208,0.00026085376,0.0000014188366,0.000043921496,0.000017086362,0.000016936105,0.000044149114,0.00018131215,0.9990299,0.000004089745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015604204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003996002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7412019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011884804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019153247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36914408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316443630","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007420","title":"Still “Law” and Still “Learning”? Quel «droit» et quel «savoir?»","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Legal research; Law; Agency (philosophy); Mandate; Political science; Legal education; Commission; Legal profession; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.02769544051571706,"score_gpt":0.3099887976768725,"score_spread":0.28229335716115544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316443630","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075541297,0.028253885,0.0033084394,0.7175842,0.011540537,0.00002937935,0.00038653705,0.00023482543,0.23110804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3686637,0.022829087,0.003480585,0.14161643,0.0044076876,0.000046718702,0.00047683486,0.00044072187,0.4580382],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992998,0.0015213143,0.00014184589,0.00080486573,0.0029776585,0.0015562101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99254483,0.001250182,0.00049325655,0.000516061,0.0035932127,0.001602436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004053974,0.00049058796,0.00047882777,0.0011406194,0.015109183,0.022591129,0.0016057931,0.0043004435,0.01412766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010769754,0.00032194075,0.000395313,0.0021869475,0.03052959,0.011399355,0.0030193427,0.009648868,0.0030088194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029457222,0.00002225156,0.0016546784,0.00014136866,0.000015686146,0.00017919924,0.018485455,0.00006434123,0.00044597182,0.44995174,0.48616716,0.04284274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022765944,0.0000068769887,0.0013051401,0.0001207143,0.0000056721065,0.00007202553,0.010409644,0.00004764062,0.00022125038,0.017083475,0.9707026,0.00002258323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76677406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8394676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76677406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037055477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05240027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46919888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316724239","doi":"10.5206/tjr.2015.1.3.5","title":"Transitional Justice in Higher Education","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transitional justice review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transitional justice; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Field (mathematics); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.2526936357957652,"score_gpt":0.46793201254183087,"score_spread":0.21523837674606566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316724239","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008035131,0.8635673,0.0011729709,0.05401565,0.0014470076,0.000025072297,0.000034893226,0.0000153048,0.07168662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4602859,0.4910132,0.0012055227,0.0334594,0.0022510628,0.00006282094,0.00006936999,0.000018915245,0.011633855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927845,0.0041433824,0.00039228305,0.00052576396,0.0012181128,0.0009358433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355936,0.0038023724,0.00069645606,0.00035380406,0.0011971588,0.00039081878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060894727,0.00022984657,0.0004312961,0.0035279733,0.0034488034,0.0053393166,0.0007973657,0.0041458597,0.0029894288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013343341,0.00012169532,0.00048982166,0.0048373668,0.0067888484,0.0044887043,0.0027094304,0.00347351,0.00038632922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146797,0.000039579892,0.0011968267,0.0024501416,0.0000305666,0.00014747806,0.0039271116,0.00036935625,0.00011683142,0.772004,0.03209492,0.18760854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010140127,0.000096767144,0.0076931687,0.013015756,0.000039997725,0.00030452196,0.0070350803,0.00019995011,0.0003508588,0.16795644,0.8032668,0.000030396297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010284263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015343145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010284263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007801052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015425371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05660087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317017778","doi":"10.1086/657959","title":"Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. <i>Limits of Legality: The Ethics of Lawless Judging</i>.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Pp. 354. $65.00 (cloth).","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2193559932793061,"score_gpt":0.3851364791892516,"score_spread":0.16578048590994549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317017778","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014668908,0.63744795,0.0038519448,0.23923647,0.013748873,0.00003679925,0.0006342174,0.00028052306,0.103296325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08311896,0.640671,0.005567122,0.047608566,0.014253671,0.00012059964,0.00053454784,0.0007464377,0.20737907],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921477,0.0002085396,0.00006537167,0.000079160396,0.00035903743,0.00007312697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929541,0.003945062,0.0002619428,0.00019330998,0.002101439,0.00054421375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017874286,0.0009325351,0.0006707263,0.0028048214,0.0028324071,0.0038351167,0.0016712744,0.005328315,0.04116482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009430119,0.0012112441,0.00049739314,0.0022309686,0.0041563977,0.01311023,0.0017013662,0.007909042,0.016818779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002755942,0.000014633237,0.00021954221,0.0002468822,0.000008069273,0.00006941573,0.0011107936,0.00007240886,0.00010733256,0.02274411,0.92287916,0.052500054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024780738,0.000016175005,0.0019857963,0.0014257189,0.000023254543,0.00030388226,0.0017660874,0.00011977521,0.00031781205,0.05454474,0.9394365,0.000035505404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031089325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060401313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04116482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021542062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033760685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13771003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317453076","doi":"10.1093/tandt/tts116","title":"More miseries for trustees","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.078985478390366,"score_gpt":0.44765099346444115,"score_spread":0.36866551507407513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317453076","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012703901,0.010894748,0.0020742812,0.7143088,0.18900912,0.0000261999,0.00016065969,0.00031424515,0.0819416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039225727,0.0052291728,0.0013723669,0.46017978,0.07335292,0.00006175021,0.00017264993,0.0008167427,0.41958895],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96934456,0.010625773,0.0018873767,0.0039349236,0.011036254,0.0031711021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93615603,0.014274952,0.0049132733,0.007067999,0.025722925,0.011864834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017977376,0.0010421755,0.0011273399,0.0019436374,0.01044208,0.01603427,0.0024771579,0.011691439,0.05792254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09015156,0.00062223256,0.0012250276,0.0017691111,0.006257333,0.013957266,0.007757758,0.022701504,0.036115974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020249245,0.00001069842,0.00018538554,0.000043933895,0.000010375377,0.000111645866,0.0011001762,0.000020212818,0.00004817874,0.03647627,0.95267105,0.009301863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002787203,0.00000698449,0.00007816043,0.000036199777,0.0000025449704,0.00009863909,0.00065832527,0.00001914874,0.000024714982,0.002563064,0.9964986,0.000010821989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009017194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013149841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05792254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008715021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008623017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19377023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317987923","doi":"10.1017/s082932010000747x","title":"What Will Rising Law School Tuition Fees Mean for Law and Learning?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Political science; Higher education; Sociology","score_opus":0.024142012751307906,"score_gpt":0.3124235704158381,"score_spread":0.28828155766453023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317987923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03749976,0.0069802515,0.0004901436,0.86174595,0.0022274877,0.000025168318,0.00051590597,0.000073436924,0.09044188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76573783,0.020843707,0.0017205067,0.13163935,0.002865121,0.00008482226,0.0005452625,0.0001127018,0.07645071],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956392,0.000651842,0.00009955536,0.00019448246,0.0012077389,0.002207115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852924,0.0019122413,0.0009883206,0.00019762274,0.0035618413,0.008047643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039497623,0.00027595102,0.00044045385,0.0012127426,0.006458222,0.011543168,0.0012257413,0.004760635,0.015325267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019879775,0.00016968735,0.0005279452,0.001689742,0.004852039,0.004779176,0.0019323647,0.0050946604,0.0027235318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111905414,0.00024554934,0.050698597,0.0002831535,0.000049088325,0.00038521658,0.0064175525,0.00067640055,0.00051622157,0.13765952,0.5832131,0.21974374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037087262,0.00030288004,0.20016593,0.0012554262,0.00007577173,0.0002571602,0.037359238,0.0009983854,0.000965362,0.040063813,0.7182968,0.00022205187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45877796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6398273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54122204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03256292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027374782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9122152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318172477","doi":"10.1515/zfrs-2007-0205","title":"Conducting Law Reform Research: A Comparative Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law reform; Commission; Law; Political science; Legal research; Economic Justice; Public law; Comparative law; Legal profession; Sociology","score_opus":0.6853262751232253,"score_gpt":0.6079270627646128,"score_spread":0.07739921235861247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318172477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036950063,0.11714895,0.04112701,0.2626568,0.0024299463,0.0011486624,0.00043528993,0.00014340314,0.5379599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8846174,0.04607978,0.03715352,0.019533465,0.0016038794,0.0026221105,0.00030602605,0.000115712246,0.007968153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6098384,0.36503842,0.004029194,0.0035143355,0.012302284,0.005277348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48946306,0.46042195,0.0076940423,0.011970923,0.023771483,0.0066786115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23418485,0.0008883884,0.0023591635,0.017190214,0.014531686,0.03595098,0.0049940795,0.013319689,0.012430561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18869074,0.0009388533,0.00088818785,0.023253132,0.049578123,0.029729255,0.013056344,0.006591289,0.0009627426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056689238,0.00014154123,0.0010676351,0.0011607581,0.000026628866,0.00014673574,0.016443053,0.00031624147,0.00008376736,0.9569473,0.0052259504,0.018383656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026044672,0.0007885256,0.005904413,0.015566081,0.00012493228,0.00046569773,0.18955882,0.0015038908,0.0008538281,0.45040405,0.33449382,0.00007549619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011035657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011516478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23418485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037835084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03746247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318217376","doi":"10.1017/s082932010000795x","title":"An Update on Self-Regulation in the Legal Profession (1989–2000): Funnel In and Funnel Out","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Funnel; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02574672302466721,"score_gpt":0.32095760051785915,"score_spread":0.29521087749319197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318217376","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02704563,0.7729566,0.0037847937,0.088848956,0.022432454,0.0002872651,0.009983097,0.0004119921,0.07424918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13449347,0.7921101,0.0053818007,0.019180316,0.011477463,0.00037863184,0.010014101,0.00020908241,0.026755042],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973673,0.00047310823,0.00076900335,0.00017294683,0.0010249473,0.00019260244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696769,0.011942434,0.003539346,0.0012730508,0.012276927,0.0012912462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007140642,0.0005149495,0.00069219427,0.0183237,0.00086056197,0.0043133767,0.0012644641,0.0017317103,0.0055863266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02878264,0.0004875984,0.00042265555,0.017089427,0.0017075895,0.0056502107,0.002318191,0.0017108774,0.0010495482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013358476,0.000049320843,0.022356939,0.006697893,0.00006814784,0.00017064728,0.007838778,0.0002924992,0.0003630123,0.007958057,0.20483482,0.7492363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012311344,0.00004278137,0.04197704,0.006922946,0.00008246757,0.00036662974,0.002638287,0.00010725142,0.0002176016,0.00095507,0.94663876,0.000038936985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.096818306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1358393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99363214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063678715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011106013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19250953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W231854594","doi":"","title":"Educación legal y formación docente: el rol de los centros de enseñanza y aprendizaje","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Repositorio Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (Universidad de Buenos Aires)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Face (sociological concept); Socratic method; Curriculum; Selection (genetic algorithm); Pedagogy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.015103818391318276,"score_gpt":0.3134715078457857,"score_spread":0.2983676894544674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W231854594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4452104,0.010862303,0.005274549,0.13702457,0.0015043335,0.00015657391,0.00017280813,0.0003049019,0.39948955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323319,0.0033721607,0.002204116,0.0026892144,0.00021634692,0.000041051575,0.000060690432,0.000057274534,0.05902718],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536514,0.002109666,0.00009083555,0.00026629193,0.0009353831,0.001232662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99039817,0.0020116235,0.0007959487,0.0003681993,0.0023657212,0.0040602926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007922639,0.00019280295,0.00019557713,0.0014273742,0.008853211,0.009879809,0.0010878578,0.0018697476,0.0064220903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013061015,0.00019398812,0.0001747705,0.0013983579,0.0060638217,0.0035148507,0.0049189315,0.0027285824,0.0008449761],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014328859,0.0003884947,0.037411463,0.00030627567,0.00001808874,0.0015833458,0.22543336,0.00058204087,0.0008194385,0.2165643,0.108605,0.40814492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044018936,0.00011461085,0.03154942,0.00074983534,0.000018428882,0.0003748703,0.1463097,0.0005454258,0.00073240045,0.010457549,0.8090535,0.000050207294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16269201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22682011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16269201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021584503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043506496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32349008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318940133","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007730","title":"Dossier on the <i>Arthurs Report</i> on Law and Learning: A Reaction from University of Quebec in Montreal (UQAM)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scholarship; Order (exchange); Political science; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.019298836677354193,"score_gpt":0.26439424827288704,"score_spread":0.24509541159553286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318940133","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032996014,0.0050540767,0.00014982383,0.95122653,0.020712703,0.00021197289,0.0004888056,0.000118338794,0.01873811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07550641,0.0062104524,0.0007769824,0.51813585,0.013935321,0.0005266632,0.0006357265,0.00071031356,0.38356227],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96071225,0.005995842,0.0015076656,0.0022983896,0.021846654,0.0076392572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9229874,0.0148326885,0.0034026606,0.0019145726,0.0367026,0.020160068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021789039,0.00198337,0.001646262,0.0028400521,0.037164535,0.018225212,0.007679184,0.030382425,0.026322013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05426141,0.0014760871,0.0017766419,0.003201549,0.014597886,0.0042401934,0.0070841024,0.026522947,0.005680671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002609331,0.000025272493,0.00044260127,0.000043706823,0.00000602163,0.0002726435,0.0027281425,0.00004529439,0.0003017169,0.0026080126,0.99118197,0.0023185662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021612525,0.00004423139,0.0054220576,0.00016128579,0.000009093509,0.000073783514,0.00879494,0.00007789511,0.0003312172,0.00021210568,0.98471016,0.00014160918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9465955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9460731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8972446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1027554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14140856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7455461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319535774","doi":"10.3167/hrrh.2010.360304","title":"Shadowing the Bar: Studying an English Professional Elite","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Bar (unit); Competition (biology); Core (optical fiber); Position (finance); Political science; Process (computing); Sociology; Public relations; Law; Engineering; Business; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.08105632324191664,"score_gpt":0.41991560577496617,"score_spread":0.33885928253304953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319535774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795743,0.000265085,0.00026779622,0.0013552924,0.000044824483,0.000021964994,0.000015323481,0.0000029573723,0.018452326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97992843,0.0005873769,0.00019676407,0.00069479266,0.000083954415,0.000021572652,0.00002099221,0.000014379177,0.018451637],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754435,0.0010481201,0.00006247617,0.00023170603,0.00040982434,0.00070363766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975126,0.0011812401,0.00029335916,0.000072821946,0.00032983354,0.0006101722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003873243,0.0003100732,0.0006097886,0.0025671108,0.01560076,0.010770307,0.0013751292,0.0017333109,0.0053534377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054995692,0.00036856768,0.00017332057,0.0022802968,0.012407572,0.0049346196,0.0053480533,0.0029894758,0.000850336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146679895,0.0000768503,0.0029806667,0.000019926048,0.0000011877837,0.00042459916,0.9875373,0.000009763415,0.000291111,0.0042763334,0.0005426153,0.0038249458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003950468,0.000069193535,0.008031431,0.00004218457,0.000003374339,0.00013842635,0.9779879,0.000067068766,0.0001532728,0.0005875113,0.012908478,0.0000072165776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043663885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07333076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043663885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059123356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003960276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08681947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319666798","doi":"10.1017/s1472669611000892","title":"Report of a Session at the CALL/ACBD Conference, Calgary 2011: The Effects of Interdisciplinary Research on Law Libraries","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Library science; Political science; Association (psychology); Law library; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.08984568146905832,"score_gpt":0.4084472954281127,"score_spread":0.3186016139590544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319666798","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03858494,0.013334688,0.0009285744,0.80468565,0.063067436,0.0014622249,0.0034095363,0.0002249422,0.07430207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13020338,0.019006986,0.00304567,0.28690615,0.03256311,0.0020397024,0.0040398357,0.0005790549,0.5216161],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882811,0.0021088745,0.00030773834,0.00074339955,0.0056563164,0.002902591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613219,0.011812129,0.0017137502,0.0007929706,0.011217659,0.013141646],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020937094,0.0010553634,0.0010705333,0.0025749847,0.024451906,0.012753621,0.0022519352,0.01473622,0.03554533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021473873,0.000850451,0.0011987397,0.003178361,0.0034488316,0.0041005467,0.007938389,0.016564569,0.0046436726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017451463,0.00023117052,0.0011131619,0.0003854937,0.00002341938,0.0004020549,0.0086299945,0.00012060904,0.0011966994,0.0016786039,0.9717624,0.014281938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008860252,0.00015982316,0.019699873,0.00031708335,0.000042454667,0.00004253665,0.02404636,0.000064001826,0.0007447197,0.00051949243,0.9541686,0.00010646792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23663549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50772965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9872464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02167256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04795634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47051626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321495429","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007468","title":"Legal Consciousness and Its Significance for Law and Society Teaching Outside Canadian Law Schools","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal profession; Doctrine; Scrutiny; Legal research; Political science; Legal education; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Legal doctrine; Subject (documents); Comparative law; Public law; Philosophy of law; Private law; Sociology","score_opus":0.026472178704418314,"score_gpt":0.3154139645957446,"score_spread":0.2889417858913263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321495429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20702331,0.01145874,0.0016760979,0.3005996,0.0012816346,0.00013461693,0.00015133496,0.00013872558,0.47753602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702728,0.0034154053,0.00084388145,0.0071772486,0.00017905659,0.000036581627,0.000042415646,0.00003939711,0.017993163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98913646,0.0019654643,0.00015227779,0.00071557396,0.0030155561,0.0050148075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98291624,0.0033194069,0.00094700215,0.00038506067,0.0042891395,0.008143257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007027174,0.0004251561,0.00074008724,0.0060276883,0.05998477,0.024300357,0.0024518382,0.004145271,0.012708282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01501479,0.00043930637,0.00057676155,0.005360377,0.060228404,0.0069557116,0.0105385985,0.0077515384,0.00041741744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030628795,0.00018641131,0.014336596,0.0002512796,0.00002128146,0.0004892431,0.25730112,0.00016531453,0.0006157052,0.5970379,0.037654847,0.09190977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023155668,0.000070173104,0.08238535,0.0013597324,0.000054105938,0.00021265856,0.36646882,0.00064391486,0.00059389306,0.07654752,0.4714765,0.00016421982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98654723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7837546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21624544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37937817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9090442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323674988","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2015.1113971","title":"Early legal careers in comparative context: evidence from Canada and the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Race (biology); Value (mathematics); Capital (architecture); Political science; Comparative case; Sociology; Legal profession; Law; Gender studies; Geography","score_opus":0.054818361773509426,"score_gpt":0.3956026218112003,"score_spread":0.3407842600376909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323674988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97923785,0.0050415276,0.00014130019,0.002035459,0.000060502043,0.00003601116,0.0014892255,0.0000042976308,0.0119538205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928478,0.0037243292,0.00015847542,0.00059424667,0.000018789984,0.000019575551,0.0010635479,0.0000076219094,0.0015654671],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499965,0.0006785744,0.00015980098,0.00045956342,0.0015790957,0.0021233396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97112083,0.0046438775,0.004267004,0.00060159503,0.013121111,0.006245576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039007936,0.00026594894,0.0008408453,0.00597647,0.013676523,0.0042311214,0.0022775906,0.00097391394,0.004925667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020177163,0.0003954097,0.0003808391,0.017480304,0.0027802691,0.0019120987,0.0041171727,0.0020101345,0.0003003843],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022166477,0.00021983635,0.8771198,0.00022851212,0.00012563774,0.0005199833,0.07142895,0.0001384255,0.00010723791,0.0041274014,0.007611947,0.03815068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013123936,0.000032101423,0.89721435,0.0005257062,0.000048633443,0.00012319154,0.09071382,0.0001000242,0.0000862775,0.00024974532,0.010865698,0.000027366721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.991627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031872507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031872507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05972467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23125231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323996072","doi":"10.1017/s0021223715000230","title":"The ‘Unique Role’ of Government Lawyers in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Public sector; Law; Private sector; Public administration; Population; Work (physics); Politics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.018267270709527578,"score_gpt":0.3250305103093783,"score_spread":0.30676323959985075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323996072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3970111,0.08973447,0.0007549744,0.21810538,0.00064134307,0.00008854793,0.0005657269,0.000052098145,0.2930463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567431,0.020137744,0.00034017622,0.010082607,0.000075073054,0.000011536071,0.00007772436,0.000014274874,0.012517709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510705,0.0006886928,0.00007952697,0.0003791157,0.0013504045,0.0023952248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930646,0.0016009548,0.0006582777,0.00012276397,0.0023750095,0.0021783586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023366595,0.00014151508,0.000477036,0.002072469,0.015222688,0.008431802,0.0015101525,0.00236222,0.0040513757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005975881,0.00029168607,0.00018118888,0.005302041,0.009721358,0.0017190507,0.0024260343,0.0025750436,0.00020262941],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010470368,0.00013906852,0.05820879,0.0010170818,0.0000852503,0.0026919714,0.10727018,0.0010081712,0.0012493521,0.50280136,0.14003775,0.18538645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003840014,0.000049156606,0.118019804,0.0012405468,0.00010902313,0.0006650775,0.14095184,0.0004858299,0.0005850257,0.015013251,0.7227236,0.00011852116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99834776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15339139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15339139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25009915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.981946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326021517","doi":"10.5553/elr.000051","title":"Canadian Civil Justice: Relief in Small and Simple Matters in an Age of Efficiency","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Austerity; Political science; Optimism; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08564345820256092,"score_gpt":0.3962839436971032,"score_spread":0.31064048549454226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326021517","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01886181,0.131319,0.0012286265,0.67262703,0.0036737565,0.00010054498,0.00040528053,0.000075866745,0.1717081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6344113,0.13961034,0.00463031,0.15527314,0.0017880341,0.00011785341,0.00041022527,0.00010756392,0.06365127],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866757,0.0020056488,0.0003326613,0.00073647726,0.0070484467,0.0032011042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796041,0.0038853625,0.00084964914,0.00042193139,0.010548371,0.004690609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068775997,0.00044862318,0.0006628402,0.0034009295,0.021200486,0.012428923,0.0024972921,0.005378154,0.009769413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027937626,0.00029020844,0.00046767516,0.005862434,0.01529175,0.0043970537,0.0041015223,0.0062579373,0.0005929574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046844565,0.000047422523,0.004581684,0.0014102871,0.000052497508,0.00056056754,0.010529579,0.00048070407,0.00033439422,0.4230123,0.4305954,0.1283484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002824978,0.000034601562,0.01597193,0.0018818044,0.000059603277,0.00024888502,0.01767089,0.0002685561,0.00029855236,0.024434619,0.9389962,0.00010607149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99549484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15394528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15394528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.409962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327300000","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007456","title":"Teaching Is Part of Legal Education","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Assertion; Subject (documents); Object (grammar); Sociology; Work (physics); Pedagogy; Political science; Law; Public relations; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.024668246677942172,"score_gpt":0.32433085248164956,"score_spread":0.2996626058037074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327300000","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013034244,0.008636585,0.0025397337,0.53753024,0.0043051527,0.000047272708,0.000038439368,0.0001012278,0.43376705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73622257,0.01255361,0.003981262,0.10252536,0.005489569,0.00012170782,0.00009675007,0.00014351384,0.13886574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9733523,0.013399755,0.00069014984,0.0015644074,0.0071371603,0.0038562487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96793693,0.0118774,0.0030200565,0.0021774352,0.0047083898,0.010279837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009993732,0.00027868064,0.0005981443,0.001110166,0.015538183,0.014713639,0.00177534,0.0060661295,0.015557926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02312737,0.00024517937,0.00039160048,0.0019983982,0.034958888,0.010490577,0.0078119775,0.0101018865,0.0024925498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008719479,0.00018255632,0.0018887598,0.0002800501,0.000008069009,0.00016374092,0.078409046,0.00013075434,0.0002197338,0.7235529,0.093734644,0.10142115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059128593,0.000046468514,0.0035702,0.0008224767,0.000007146725,0.00013031188,0.039410513,0.00014656053,0.00025497237,0.08831134,0.86726755,0.000026388558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07977571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.086369954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07977571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022719033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04434665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16483891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328940675","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2366537","title":"Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02977344866634638,"score_gpt":0.38826856471512633,"score_spread":0.3584951160487799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328940675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0244294,0.20247532,0.036768667,0.48545045,0.0031318532,0.000055994053,0.000206675,0.0001424898,0.2473391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8256968,0.056182373,0.01830465,0.04240273,0.008629423,0.00029166174,0.00021938718,0.00013690042,0.048136074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653864,0.0019397628,0.0001136601,0.00037101624,0.0008000389,0.0002368654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926185,0.005723635,0.0004634248,0.00041341016,0.0005106621,0.00027036332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052218917,0.0005250283,0.00072524685,0.002972273,0.0039238892,0.009094478,0.0013873125,0.0061492487,0.005580449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008116321,0.00047772267,0.0006201007,0.0031334383,0.04603386,0.01993258,0.0030982357,0.007421457,0.00072830473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034534532,0.000006417976,0.00007944018,0.000022212116,0.0000021123606,0.000016821232,0.00077737577,0.00009002645,0.000021675774,0.9938315,0.0030939337,0.0020549893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003977134,0.0000029053301,0.00011449307,0.00004045604,0.000001304855,0.0000142388335,0.0003892397,0.00022099909,0.000017449827,0.9773362,0.021854749,0.000003972581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009205942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065631955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009205942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007829486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037267562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05680716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330257850","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1291","title":"Book Review: Law and Risk, by the Law Commission of Canada (ed)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Commission; Political science","score_opus":0.01100334463601157,"score_gpt":0.2992388737836095,"score_spread":0.288235529147598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330257850","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024308384,0.86801696,0.00028079044,0.060741093,0.031890765,0.0000951673,0.0015801972,0.00013893771,0.037013013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048132055,0.6186583,0.00092999754,0.033018436,0.020206574,0.00018598221,0.00186302,0.00018256754,0.32014197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967182,0.00027922235,0.00018392567,0.00018281557,0.0023333717,0.0003024393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98731506,0.0023539448,0.00059899414,0.00029467008,0.00864371,0.00079370325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026986469,0.0014858957,0.0030421983,0.009954664,0.0033327593,0.006788482,0.0030312627,0.0069906753,0.038863428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0130072255,0.0011008783,0.00083886064,0.018401217,0.0027311316,0.0030497028,0.0012266834,0.0040839016,0.0172081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029346077,0.0000025951174,0.000038223196,0.00014063735,0.0000023465109,0.000006764299,0.000014213217,0.00002765252,0.000007818421,0.00035879234,0.9888387,0.01055932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005152269,0.000005052663,0.00071677455,0.0009179729,0.000012078085,0.000036359754,0.000054974887,0.000034941997,0.00001850242,0.0006282351,0.9975604,0.0000097717975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6486993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8848192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35130072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02690288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06170394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7067392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333643508","doi":"10.1086/678914","title":"<i>Suspicious Gifts: Bribery, Morality, and Professional Ethics</i>. By Malin Åkerström. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 2014. Pp. xviii+191. $49.45.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Sociology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Database transaction; Permission; Sociology; Download; Media studies; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web; Database","score_opus":0.058147107119854484,"score_gpt":0.394211659544747,"score_spread":0.3360645524248925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333643508","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046871015,0.8598128,0.00051054003,0.094806276,0.0047619976,0.0000103345155,0.00009473231,0.000071172144,0.039463345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032358844,0.72591823,0.0012719396,0.018324245,0.01154635,0.00006023142,0.00025602395,0.0002047344,0.21005946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991817,0.0003830835,0.000045965742,0.00007310147,0.00024029885,0.00007590607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982462,0.0010429905,0.00020564532,0.000072377516,0.00023625654,0.00019660857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013887304,0.0015537152,0.0007917439,0.0020682032,0.0014819765,0.005217504,0.0012990878,0.0037218693,0.02943624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041764094,0.00090984756,0.00042332304,0.0027997645,0.0062567843,0.009387148,0.0024411434,0.0043494385,0.011935962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026481228,0.000017155025,0.0001985829,0.0003189064,0.000008021633,0.00004203701,0.00079892296,0.00006523685,0.00006808876,0.020437637,0.9192383,0.058780614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010754139,0.000020626347,0.0016606968,0.0016933592,0.00001027063,0.0003932268,0.0019422116,0.000191045,0.0001657915,0.0663012,0.92758805,0.000022964226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012302646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027856037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02943624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003402614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023357547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098474026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335623464","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007444","title":"Le <i>Rapport Arthurs</i> vingt ans plus tard: «commentaire sur les commentaires»","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.036089680922355975,"score_gpt":0.29646500317141966,"score_spread":0.2603753222490637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335623464","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024986486,0.005507417,0.0007942052,0.95661867,0.018599128,0.000026034266,0.00011099085,0.00005494026,0.015789935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07776827,0.008545427,0.0015627028,0.7925064,0.016104715,0.00022589474,0.00015248769,0.0003679914,0.102766156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773426,0.010877329,0.0009118399,0.0032071339,0.0061703795,0.0014906751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92218965,0.03743705,0.005850676,0.0032218057,0.026094902,0.005205901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017132876,0.001018337,0.0008289408,0.0015685472,0.014389462,0.013966561,0.0036822085,0.010805526,0.0161416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11162463,0.00058519375,0.0009803053,0.0017482826,0.016300315,0.0121137425,0.005799642,0.027177982,0.006070645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033330023,0.000017128708,0.0015487232,0.00022568523,0.000017966488,0.00024809732,0.027379634,0.000031832715,0.00025567587,0.034690436,0.9269846,0.008566863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008491845,0.00001691929,0.0015696766,0.00066691975,0.000019177884,0.00028480028,0.032117862,0.000062227016,0.0004717836,0.006461509,0.9582472,0.00007346553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09619083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098830484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98949933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010500689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01684016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19126189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336864278","doi":"10.1177/1556264616637965","title":"Book Review: The Ethics Police? The struggle to make human research safe","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Human research; Ethics committee; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Engineering; Public administration","score_opus":0.8321787933319287,"score_gpt":0.7426037277584595,"score_spread":0.08957506557346917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336864278","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039298582,0.14399211,0.0011117044,0.7869484,0.055469196,0.00006618456,0.000108187225,0.000054687236,0.011856579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021436103,0.21372887,0.005345356,0.5630836,0.117276624,0.00059222005,0.00024146105,0.0004575728,0.07783813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95971406,0.02564874,0.0023994448,0.0013136392,0.01019556,0.00072855345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.655012,0.27500343,0.010489325,0.007404296,0.045508035,0.0065828394],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031644516,0.0006012583,0.002221808,0.0033071153,0.0024795623,0.010885135,0.0020490033,0.012178342,0.0128795365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18566875,0.00094449444,0.0007200612,0.0038980057,0.009228373,0.00748526,0.001902965,0.01423039,0.0068719746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009114688,0.000007187984,0.000069998896,0.00070338405,0.000024606092,0.000044559016,0.00027204488,0.000034425877,0.000043420383,0.008301536,0.97104466,0.019445054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023251487,0.000015322808,0.00023760162,0.0039053045,0.000038100574,0.00023198716,0.0005738984,0.00010152752,0.00009648379,0.016737368,0.9780061,0.000033041604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007572201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021602465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98782164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074354038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025430303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16735417},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2338889572","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1460","title":"Book Review: Gender and the Legal Profession: Fitting Or Breaking the Mould, by Joan Brockman; Scales of Success: Constructions of Life-Career Success of Eminent Men and Women Lawyers, by Sheelagh O'donovan-Polten","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.0238751257416003,"score_gpt":0.3276691625024716,"score_spread":0.3037940367608713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338889572","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012612097,0.8133103,0.00025668018,0.08232823,0.0937709,0.00006024235,0.00024895577,0.000044377583,0.009854131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018817016,0.6918929,0.00074071524,0.08359631,0.111305214,0.00025709093,0.00044985258,0.000118425756,0.10975778],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987664,0.00030306427,0.000111375586,0.00014744446,0.0005879992,0.00008373895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99143326,0.0046085916,0.00039314086,0.00012306067,0.0027458486,0.000696165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018280047,0.0015272312,0.0024851558,0.0055498695,0.0014728135,0.0037198616,0.0022903995,0.005964,0.02104289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009379949,0.00088876305,0.0008089083,0.007469451,0.0019194018,0.0037049006,0.0014161397,0.006153759,0.012624717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048314473,0.0000062877866,0.000027122896,0.0002539471,0.0000045203874,0.000008274808,0.000013787489,0.000012371266,0.0000122566025,0.00025982823,0.98902917,0.010367629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001936128,0.000014936103,0.0006139453,0.0016272377,0.00002585987,0.000117852316,0.0000778873,0.00003921558,0.000023943994,0.0008627014,0.99656457,0.000012498162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020827753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08915581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02104289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037191636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00457818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07039547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339721888","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1174","title":"Law Commissions and Access to Justice: What Justice Should We Be Talking About?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Mandate; Realm; Law; Work (physics); Political science; Order (exchange); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Law reform; Business; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.19732907774695418,"score_gpt":0.4516456204491538,"score_spread":0.2543165427021996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339721888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011828802,0.020472264,0.0041517867,0.8952442,0.0020599333,0.000026909107,0.000030449324,0.000044351615,0.066141315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79780996,0.020552367,0.0037149275,0.15318355,0.004702981,0.0001344152,0.00005545341,0.00011442875,0.019731892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9742958,0.014776584,0.0010521293,0.0014618331,0.004272496,0.00414112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96042883,0.018864965,0.0048673223,0.0017930348,0.004027478,0.010018425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01878316,0.0003776723,0.0012204685,0.002750549,0.015940942,0.029543513,0.002183321,0.01870688,0.011701356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07289505,0.0005447727,0.0006279513,0.0035041578,0.061990865,0.047032908,0.013955514,0.017468074,0.0014458892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019785877,0.00005739758,0.0017144058,0.00013242912,0.000012428676,0.00025341407,0.030813526,0.00007094655,0.000057196885,0.90007895,0.03943851,0.027351039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024030824,0.000035035806,0.0018726295,0.0014161378,0.000022556922,0.00035940311,0.04267629,0.00013969981,0.00009497688,0.6915815,0.26171294,0.00006493102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019066691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016601304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029543513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011483387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018539922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09933609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340799908","doi":"","title":"Judge - Architect - Judge","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Function (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.014644710700639345,"score_gpt":0.34719465016449746,"score_spread":0.33254993946385814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340799908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029691586,0.0020733695,0.012356261,0.039626915,0.016816376,0.00047822754,0.0005672797,0.0021482417,0.92296416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035714813,0.0007286937,0.0037678028,0.016046565,0.0019525976,0.00016698992,0.00030810048,0.001092532,0.9402219],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859993,0.0025335283,0.0008109498,0.002393185,0.00651372,0.0017493694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98220396,0.002028002,0.0005292552,0.0022651695,0.008395763,0.0045778984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006829539,0.0009277584,0.0009317021,0.0016253779,0.007580806,0.012698157,0.0018777944,0.006682933,0.22851355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025430713,0.00077704934,0.0006483053,0.0010981143,0.0031056833,0.007600491,0.007509653,0.00793156,0.16704029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023388613,0.00003807147,0.0005636115,0.00006731274,0.0000051608276,0.00034352258,0.001213262,0.000058888865,0.00051361555,0.06569218,0.8810641,0.050416876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004872503,0.000008176773,0.00024355997,0.000026885316,0.0000019535744,0.00019213199,0.00040428288,0.000078618184,0.00012379093,0.0038976795,0.99500704,0.000011050308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044628344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010609509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22851355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00469553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0082194945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.764454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340814178","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12192","title":"Editors Note: Happy Fiftieth Anniversary to the <i>Law &amp; Society Review!</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Law; Grossman; History; Sociology; Classics; Political science","score_opus":0.04918775844110089,"score_gpt":0.3944599631686215,"score_spread":0.34527220472752057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340814178","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000977131,0.0105290385,0.00032767374,0.13603643,0.82061076,0.0001071984,0.00053553213,0.00055071205,0.03120507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020704775,0.01580965,0.0007448102,0.13472229,0.46368766,0.00042419354,0.0010208912,0.00064279285,0.38087723],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925714,0.0007603536,0.00051439117,0.0008348664,0.0047611897,0.0005577804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9523092,0.0045833364,0.00342349,0.0017001582,0.030804647,0.0071791504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007563717,0.0017621265,0.0016136226,0.004411602,0.0037055376,0.01242372,0.0025631273,0.008447943,0.10892146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051689673,0.0010491213,0.0014232281,0.0023917535,0.0015138455,0.0060598333,0.002668873,0.009200151,0.1675432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032623375,0.0000023038524,0.000014360816,0.000033001208,0.0000011335163,0.000011194801,0.0000036578388,0.0000021847682,0.000014808215,0.00013680579,0.9976164,0.002160863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049019786,0.000007935971,0.00013581754,0.00011186022,0.0000028037653,0.00002838562,0.000021262747,0.000010196034,0.000031024123,0.00021892504,0.999419,0.0000079433075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028950928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074653025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10892146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035286408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006166312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36437863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341045857","doi":"","title":"'Whack' No More: Infusing Equality into the Ethics of Defence Lawyering in Sexual Assault Cases","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Civility; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Sociology; Denial; Political science; Supreme court; Criminology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.1313409096164841,"score_gpt":0.453985020041841,"score_spread":0.3226441104253569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341045857","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3119271,0.008718255,0.00612831,0.39277545,0.0021455751,0.00009654678,0.000023681614,0.000053272706,0.27813178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454778,0.0016763547,0.0008651931,0.03590136,0.00038249543,0.00004542876,0.000007841309,0.00006210749,0.01558138],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741576,0.018011793,0.00053720025,0.0010910581,0.0022562253,0.003946128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98037887,0.014953568,0.0011661014,0.00078126835,0.0010784212,0.0016416564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0141196605,0.00041106343,0.00044792387,0.0010829949,0.025151333,0.01577532,0.002006076,0.011149917,0.0033000738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035137974,0.0006096602,0.00040045395,0.00084986445,0.07696345,0.016318766,0.016232328,0.020556945,0.00037635505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002239539,0.000036797454,0.0011747659,0.000062191386,0.000006183598,0.0014489831,0.61678535,0.000053231444,0.000242231,0.3589575,0.01064186,0.010568584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031280022,0.00006544714,0.0030473478,0.0007042793,0.000015675962,0.0010793784,0.71249425,0.00018023548,0.00065877184,0.12078135,0.16088144,0.000060510243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051288057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07714889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051288057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011655373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010068201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10197908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341471969","doi":"","title":"The Law Practice Program: Tackling Racial Inequality in the Legal Profession?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Legal profession; Political science; Law; Practice of law; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.050738990177018474,"score_gpt":0.452882019306472,"score_spread":0.4021430291294535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341471969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62172073,0.0032712733,0.006374596,0.21565114,0.0011625726,0.00039528013,0.000121962395,0.000110621426,0.15119189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495005,0.0013624566,0.004315063,0.01932427,0.00026761397,0.00026916916,0.00007309624,0.000034282886,0.024853671],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526393,0.0018671397,0.00005630699,0.00027776798,0.0008323638,0.0017023351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99326795,0.0010669202,0.0005128615,0.00021852402,0.0005074342,0.004426285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004290067,0.00019116882,0.0002982344,0.0009320777,0.012974961,0.00440051,0.0017949525,0.00200899,0.008960259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009338144,0.00017366267,0.00021762596,0.0010419769,0.0047055557,0.0033387186,0.00744703,0.0030195266,0.00076725835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016489248,0.001452827,0.101994105,0.00054623483,0.00002811331,0.001599328,0.12773752,0.0003226551,0.0026380334,0.15156637,0.06685886,0.54509115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001303517,0.0009328005,0.19602984,0.001501941,0.000047604368,0.0009724446,0.24072213,0.001092041,0.0010183728,0.02216309,0.53531563,0.00007377688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17235479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5300818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17235479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009828909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05286789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34270316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341510308","doi":"10.14198/raei.2015.28.02","title":"Teaching Legal English for Company Law: A Guide to Specialism and ELP Teaching Practices and Reference Books","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Mainstream; Criticism; Strengths and weaknesses; Domain (mathematical analysis); English for specific purposes; Mathematics education; Sociology; Listing (finance); Pedagogy; Law; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Library science; Business","score_opus":0.11013079988204688,"score_gpt":0.43806028253334034,"score_spread":0.32792948265129346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341510308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03084265,0.07132872,0.05558788,0.030803986,0.0034016846,0.0016013217,0.0033135337,0.0038354888,0.79928476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052729294,0.082235195,0.110759355,0.009523819,0.0009810902,0.0015307638,0.004148582,0.0013205697,0.7367714],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994954,0.00014112236,0.000055738885,0.000041283158,0.00022752602,0.000038877886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908936,0.0004709746,0.000067633475,0.000051364004,0.0001969207,0.00012382414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007572215,0.00061373593,0.0006434602,0.0022150795,0.0011650671,0.0023249944,0.0009037365,0.0010443267,0.035848856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020565072,0.00056023506,0.0002497492,0.002729971,0.0008521467,0.0034206815,0.0015472127,0.0018926276,0.02061202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023963425,0.00049555633,0.00077179325,0.00063953525,0.000003225097,0.0006839169,0.01037825,0.00051702367,0.004030651,0.015905231,0.45631263,0.51023835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004640313,0.000046897065,0.0014005358,0.00037279207,9.644151e-7,0.0006106235,0.0017995193,0.00013534818,0.00018998476,0.0037277981,0.991702,0.000008854363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025649935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008887952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035848856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009493885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018473336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11992639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342223182","doi":"10.63567/3y78x433","title":"Collaboration among Legal Information Providers in Quebec: CAIJ and Lexum's Shared Vision","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of open access to law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.045595924527835174,"score_gpt":0.46139923245358405,"score_spread":0.4158033079257489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342223182","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12288436,0.010714193,0.0085754655,0.5188457,0.0008014692,0.00025713773,0.000617354,0.0003617795,0.33694252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9094647,0.0027503096,0.006041493,0.016151482,0.00015304427,0.00013559176,0.00024012648,0.00008373219,0.064979434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875092,0.00465028,0.00033972747,0.0011439415,0.003102421,0.0032544723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98099536,0.0054051327,0.0011159197,0.0008222683,0.005459582,0.006201733],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0105137415,0.0004155942,0.0004910888,0.0032103076,0.034326993,0.022578971,0.003038059,0.0063697333,0.009673504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018243557,0.0006347316,0.00051452115,0.0050382908,0.012939972,0.009276064,0.010497142,0.0038623873,0.00056624686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017763111,0.00016892352,0.015918162,0.0003538971,0.00007848948,0.0029582763,0.14936459,0.0020460556,0.0013820739,0.51562667,0.18203716,0.12988804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009935198,0.00008148019,0.021988211,0.0009463706,0.00006520759,0.00060297194,0.14019677,0.0039560576,0.000527388,0.042238217,0.7890994,0.00019854041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98772997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98772997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1690222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29858568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96381646},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2343001917","doi":"","title":"Indigenizing the Legal Academy from a Decolonizing Perspective","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Engineering; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06066647405457732,"score_gpt":0.3939842405401579,"score_spread":0.3333177664855806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343001917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04950785,0.003010407,0.011645507,0.17518435,0.0010263348,0.00006865144,0.0000353564,0.00009586606,0.75942564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9174563,0.0010805303,0.002364064,0.020217123,0.0007775586,0.000087581764,0.000020030284,0.00011573425,0.057880983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896074,0.0044388077,0.00027299058,0.0013347765,0.0014253089,0.0029207687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98686594,0.006037335,0.0011127851,0.0017279207,0.0017693207,0.0024866452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103244055,0.00054403045,0.0008369125,0.0034104718,0.01952903,0.018739961,0.0030735778,0.010456615,0.013302866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017314069,0.000416847,0.000649675,0.0021705374,0.08706036,0.014364469,0.013881873,0.020381808,0.0011862359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034525194,0.000017581413,0.00015642564,0.000009653299,0.0000013611716,0.00003481618,0.0046861195,0.000051408286,0.000027290705,0.9914057,0.0016919615,0.0019141341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003349782,0.000038493003,0.00066253304,0.0001844548,0.0000136781655,0.00013530193,0.02050269,0.0004942512,0.00031193058,0.8679267,0.109670505,0.000025934823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011982582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020093234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98801744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014387006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023931451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104385495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344665724","doi":"","title":"THE ROLE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN CHARITY PROCEEDINGS IN CANADA AND IN ENGLAND AND WALES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; New england; Politics","score_opus":0.0065865599879291635,"score_gpt":0.26491094960472417,"score_spread":0.258324389616795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344665724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82075477,0.006939305,0.000289614,0.10444908,0.00090263074,0.00017744572,0.00027720607,0.00004897207,0.06616103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704799,0.0014774253,0.00021274507,0.010038427,0.000105782405,0.000034215773,0.000046086727,0.000028877766,0.017576639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9593342,0.008079242,0.0013844592,0.0019383655,0.005871113,0.02339263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86657697,0.022941196,0.007083685,0.0009229726,0.022778269,0.079697005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013825323,0.0003360297,0.0011981153,0.0044407183,0.039229978,0.02160957,0.006007125,0.011159963,0.01077448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07104191,0.0013854634,0.00076402,0.0048063206,0.012916223,0.00419248,0.010801739,0.012643674,0.000640897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091745984,0.0009554769,0.3768185,0.0010313911,0.0003788534,0.013830407,0.2841131,0.0018350012,0.001282646,0.12709637,0.08952428,0.1022164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110412395,0.00040805378,0.3871905,0.0015593,0.00019328367,0.0025826613,0.4980704,0.0011695971,0.00033955745,0.005232965,0.10273311,0.00041015045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9770166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99358964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15641087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15641087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32292178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9784438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345038841","doi":"10.5539/ies.v9n5p219","title":"Mediation Game When the Conflict Can Be Fun to Learn—A Legal Skill Learning Tool: The Integration of Knowledge Management, Learning Theory and Serious Game Concept","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Curriculum; Psychology; Conflict management; Conflict resolution; Class (philosophy); Experiential learning; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Knowledge management; Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05928437962927738,"score_gpt":0.4251315262221957,"score_spread":0.3658471465929183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345038841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56998193,0.0004427295,0.30588472,0.0033108257,0.00041491288,0.0023364418,0.00026410833,0.002869429,0.11449494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8044359,0.0003587388,0.17622566,0.00055582396,0.00003799744,0.00129301,0.0002411714,0.000091320006,0.016760342],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993166,0.0004046398,0.000026907703,0.0000665027,0.00010871348,0.000076651304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989728,0.0006636615,0.000055299613,0.000060080823,0.000065651446,0.00018266887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010538147,0.00068291544,0.0002839145,0.00046790595,0.00064772816,0.0020741986,0.0012957791,0.0008509082,0.005324884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030331567,0.00016856594,0.00048199442,0.0001759367,0.0012370211,0.0027655251,0.0024455532,0.001162973,0.00056850706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016010668,0.00958901,0.011884496,0.0026302054,0.00017679104,0.0037861504,0.0570214,0.013006852,0.0755451,0.16481349,0.04324967,0.6166959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001285035,0.009210614,0.025155434,0.0019412019,0.0003576976,0.00551042,0.03619465,0.24520946,0.07319527,0.15271766,0.44866213,0.0005603884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005255042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079362176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005324884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044807934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075136684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017813444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345145232","doi":"10.29173/alr459","title":"The Dean Who Went to Law School: Crossing Borders and Searching for Purpose in North American Legal Education, 1930–1950","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Legal education; Border crossing; Law; Political science; Legal history; Sociology; Immigration","score_opus":0.027052450909913667,"score_gpt":0.4106681457515209,"score_spread":0.38361569484160724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345145232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3042852,0.29258588,0.00064211234,0.13941823,0.0019404764,0.00007111946,0.00010328256,0.00003196447,0.26092172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88818896,0.053270344,0.00025076716,0.013995542,0.00041782673,0.000045911853,0.00004481923,0.000024588511,0.043761194],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947188,0.0026649605,0.000111984155,0.0004203667,0.0009511221,0.0011328091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99310654,0.0037710804,0.000507092,0.00016009889,0.0015059663,0.00094917946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065220976,0.00016777797,0.00040206473,0.0022784285,0.018592427,0.0063108113,0.0010986369,0.002703325,0.002233812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010273959,0.0003732935,0.00012554205,0.0039483593,0.025034841,0.004434224,0.0034712662,0.0039378153,0.00023057795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040476996,0.00006221267,0.007864137,0.00041393572,0.000011330611,0.0005148085,0.46630174,0.00018614288,0.0001679939,0.3838015,0.052173182,0.08846258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009409484,0.000027225427,0.040039882,0.0011907982,0.00001747408,0.00011046528,0.17469698,0.000044466102,0.00015776575,0.012702727,0.77097136,0.00003135974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73355734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8865795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92986137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07013861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07214693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53602356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345987362","doi":"","title":"Addressing Access to Justice Through New Legal Service Providers: Opportunities and Challenges","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Service provider; Business; Legal service; Service (business); Internet privacy; Public relations; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.3146598599509469,"score_gpt":0.4181744215202097,"score_spread":0.10351456156926281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345987362","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04051369,0.010209375,0.0017275613,0.91261286,0.00075126154,0.000068186935,0.000099339035,0.0000595023,0.03395815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8324648,0.031505574,0.006327814,0.104939334,0.0047876877,0.0005623573,0.00025315152,0.00010030874,0.019058928],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98371637,0.0068813576,0.00032769874,0.0010001742,0.002424927,0.0056495676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94805384,0.019326402,0.0027754717,0.0014536101,0.004208889,0.02418183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016876271,0.00046972051,0.00061470474,0.0019000843,0.009198312,0.014007427,0.0050370907,0.010409808,0.029963892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030474156,0.0005813393,0.0006586968,0.001957002,0.01247097,0.021873834,0.014950581,0.0106590865,0.002231908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012984971,0.0018405124,0.020226002,0.0011204367,0.000052808333,0.0010782243,0.025730697,0.00085569255,0.0008477228,0.37056914,0.15811266,0.41943622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028211882,0.0007105414,0.036457658,0.005528369,0.00007160759,0.001501791,0.10738325,0.0045531536,0.00062572624,0.27274102,0.56993735,0.00020741104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0416859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08122358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0416859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012593365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058510106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10023916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346416080","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-14944-8_15","title":"Professors as Victim: The Poor Review Process","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Promotion (chess); Power (physics); Psychology; Control (management); Quality (philosophy); Peer review; Anxiety; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.18709301616841356,"score_gpt":0.48649699396481544,"score_spread":0.2994039777964019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346416080","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011203287,0.08489092,0.009711258,0.8254421,0.026391009,0.00020383876,0.00010206348,0.00018958485,0.051948868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051989757,0.057461683,0.013892385,0.6945199,0.034773387,0.0014013685,0.00014093786,0.0008433544,0.1449773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8567374,0.084968,0.005934321,0.0050493847,0.04450624,0.0028046428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6164322,0.2903366,0.010424488,0.01112466,0.06570319,0.0059789084],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16881773,0.00060699513,0.001768706,0.008200265,0.0083593,0.023016663,0.004090041,0.015470016,0.0060018776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38978487,0.0011561111,0.0009374093,0.0048264316,0.01847382,0.019545205,0.008928321,0.018739857,0.0041079624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013315777,0.000015499902,0.00020202933,0.0004180707,0.000040413302,0.00012212564,0.0029844178,0.00010651723,0.000108518376,0.22892597,0.7026288,0.06443438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013174731,0.00001234231,0.0002763421,0.0018187892,0.000027174183,0.00009910777,0.0010022187,0.00019637623,0.0001822127,0.11362035,0.882712,0.000040020368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057191537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014939819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83118224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010379656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03449952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89280415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346694084","doi":"10.29173/mlj913","title":"Bend or Break: Enhancing the Responsibilities of Law Societies to Promote Access to Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09176674112237272,"score_gpt":0.4146840908205873,"score_spread":0.3229173496982146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346694084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6910231,0.00041681508,0.011998352,0.102135986,0.00058874855,0.0005877099,0.00012825531,0.00046822615,0.19265276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93529004,0.000330928,0.014540067,0.012313174,0.00006443184,0.00031589792,0.00009995952,0.000097899916,0.036947593],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99321544,0.0029362005,0.00008874852,0.0003466113,0.0011145894,0.0022983202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97257984,0.0030212698,0.0018128786,0.0017801132,0.0025545848,0.018251298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086068325,0.00049884437,0.00028073214,0.0014505887,0.01615617,0.008279174,0.0033082473,0.0045674425,0.025388578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024643544,0.0006709155,0.00047312203,0.0011904025,0.007853953,0.006199188,0.023112249,0.006476559,0.0027983857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005200875,0.0065403148,0.16439193,0.0005514109,0.0000934905,0.0014941125,0.1816233,0.0024674982,0.009290353,0.16044055,0.10795667,0.3646304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036781258,0.0013971966,0.19237238,0.0009445025,0.00015258694,0.00049465057,0.37492085,0.0038350662,0.0032788345,0.07312742,0.34893945,0.0001692305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072781265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27143028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92721874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01040854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07389704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14471525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347121535","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4583","title":"INTRODUCTION: GRADUATE STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; CONTEST; Economic Justice; Sociology; Windsor; Law; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.2810159753811594,"score_gpt":0.48420982775155286,"score_spread":0.20319385237039345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2347121535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073296885,0.038534883,0.0011061337,0.18482712,0.27875206,0.00031426203,0.0019986888,0.0007161785,0.49301773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006500003,0.016323585,0.00093451043,0.040722255,0.07801774,0.00028990838,0.0016441635,0.00065076136,0.85491717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931272,0.0009025561,0.00046430706,0.0008492548,0.0036566423,0.001000099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98818725,0.0014311094,0.0005291801,0.0012589872,0.0042822673,0.004311137],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046276376,0.001377812,0.0014199236,0.0036089541,0.0055022216,0.017327378,0.0030159715,0.0086061405,0.3052008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019008191,0.0006885812,0.0009963774,0.004987248,0.0027622012,0.010316277,0.0097107915,0.008157259,0.20412028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052569503,0.00001549634,0.000052943047,0.000073447096,7.78992e-7,0.000015085643,0.000108007305,0.0000070062424,0.00002117012,0.0066959225,0.96601146,0.026993377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001679171,0.000007282295,0.00013336955,0.00013677432,3.8317128e-7,0.000012873847,0.00008711807,0.000005000349,0.0000061070136,0.0009690565,0.9986376,0.0000026674275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038884603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065213065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3052008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059758844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009055183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2356862262","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Graduate Research in Law: Books & Journals","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.5203943824047375,"score_gpt":0.5435821193825338,"score_spread":0.023187736977796303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2356862262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016374538,0.029553197,0.0011059825,0.008046893,0.000822716,0.0001233231,0.0070762737,0.004280605,0.94735366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049317693,0.01324479,0.0020904283,0.0013335856,0.00021977142,0.00013318018,0.003154182,0.00080014754,0.9740922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999527,0.00005874783,0.000047021436,0.00006123483,0.00025023238,0.000055823155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987863,0.00027109042,0.00006949111,0.00014175914,0.00043844988,0.00029300575],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004613408,0.00082634814,0.0007128545,0.0050241835,0.0027935186,0.00637818,0.0010270448,0.0017036039,0.3233072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002235132,0.0008699446,0.00024638456,0.008640207,0.0011227721,0.0050336057,0.002210589,0.0019184246,0.15526935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010203743,0.000013574099,0.00020682828,0.00014467239,0.0000014641067,0.00003804018,0.00034006475,0.000019747618,0.00012573022,0.0036911215,0.8690156,0.12639296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025308975,0.0000037412412,0.0007853691,0.00014009133,0.0000012273886,0.000040223247,0.0002497317,0.00001726445,0.00010071143,0.0008932909,0.9977602,0.0000055631954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035051916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14110245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3233072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002313324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007627033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96522015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2363053423","doi":"10.29173/mlj858","title":"Introduction: The Association for Canadian Clinical Legal Education (ACCLE) Conference 2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Association (psychology); Political science; Library science; Medicine; Law; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.058009892353432894,"score_gpt":0.3816453789833114,"score_spread":0.3236354866298785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2363053423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015681896,0.04269391,0.001158328,0.38923782,0.118682645,0.0005152194,0.0034428043,0.00037434048,0.44232678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014074575,0.024956096,0.0014264825,0.05019142,0.015078575,0.00026143965,0.0034579695,0.00019923203,0.89035416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963916,0.0002834938,0.0001328302,0.00032219168,0.0020053473,0.0008645574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99141884,0.00038961228,0.00014571311,0.00016659935,0.004835707,0.003043559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044358848,0.000900744,0.00044214554,0.0018365207,0.004917034,0.0045989747,0.0022607816,0.007523242,0.20359258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006997756,0.00046522325,0.000572129,0.0011472043,0.0017105776,0.0019775745,0.0030703126,0.005501546,0.04427082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065702234,0.00001123281,0.0001027358,0.000048655653,7.8201185e-7,0.000022774713,0.000018847168,0.00001275959,0.000029666315,0.0008365064,0.9813054,0.017604081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037630937,0.0000026983637,0.0009326222,0.00016009035,8.7736817e-7,0.000028062921,0.000047150443,0.000015684209,0.000016409376,0.00018346205,0.9986045,0.00000472036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34264484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69604427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98591423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014085794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061400235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6813009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2364586203","doi":"","title":"An Analysis on Academic Integrity and Norms of Postgraduates in Canada University of Toronto and University of Waterloo as Examples","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Regional science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09105220518055526,"score_gpt":0.4031735324975801,"score_spread":0.3121213273170248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2364586203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78088605,0.09891961,0.0005233501,0.01846289,0.00022188669,0.00023926097,0.004445808,0.000024554003,0.09627659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677146,0.02436669,0.00036322337,0.0007590569,0.00004906206,0.00004982982,0.00095226447,0.000012032327,0.0057332586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98946804,0.001891677,0.00047165,0.0006231307,0.0054235384,0.00212192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9498313,0.0130946,0.0053250883,0.00085071096,0.026420482,0.004477896],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066490476,0.00017387971,0.00068870815,0.008706576,0.008710079,0.0037935185,0.0014300362,0.00076783367,0.0025481042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026491577,0.00022875867,0.00031835173,0.02731568,0.0035175434,0.001279667,0.0019262184,0.00109293,0.00010538615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004751064,0.0001401578,0.2880742,0.006290174,0.00034697592,0.0013381235,0.22128749,0.00087940134,0.001016522,0.15167744,0.08476636,0.24370804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029258696,0.00006357539,0.8053141,0.0017149658,0.00015731924,0.00012854995,0.06818518,0.00017015831,0.00044759572,0.00076600054,0.12296743,0.000055836223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98987705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11688041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19357228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8480307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2365348745","doi":"","title":"The Enlightenment of Canadian Evidence Law to Our Correlative Legislation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Legislature; Enlightenment; Political science; Haven; Common law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08229444942365018,"score_gpt":0.3878847961183556,"score_spread":0.3055903466947054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2365348745","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042307954,0.013472955,0.036811765,0.6810668,0.01694871,0.00029053036,0.0004496217,0.00045170292,0.24627705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23136573,0.013562685,0.06498121,0.46109393,0.00849887,0.00033642125,0.00034556424,0.0004946817,0.21932098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9454507,0.011552918,0.002789586,0.0051898095,0.030222064,0.0047949036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8723851,0.03656466,0.0032366866,0.00820739,0.06967,0.009936228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045472622,0.00073080417,0.0009953514,0.004206834,0.020706475,0.016293205,0.0033183077,0.01261587,0.008776063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09971161,0.0010534594,0.0017831747,0.0036105816,0.03362049,0.007867345,0.0064790733,0.026898822,0.0015682321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017822045,0.0000191505,0.00047072908,0.00014900527,0.000018249433,0.0001919862,0.0022971388,0.00025497208,0.00031827833,0.8395557,0.13898844,0.01771863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018160688,0.000016205853,0.0012750084,0.0003440942,0.000031307954,0.000120233315,0.0006512168,0.0003753789,0.0003657244,0.040224977,0.95649725,0.000080503654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9129586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9231801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08936511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08936511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22190483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6483923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2378917405","doi":"","title":"Thoughts on the Content Features of Moral Education in Canadian Universities","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Yangzhou University","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moral education; Content (measure theory); Moral development; Sociology; Moral disengagement; Content analysis; Pedagogy; Higher education; Political science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Social psychology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.0526203475088031,"score_gpt":0.3337267650011714,"score_spread":0.28110641749236825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2378917405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38928056,0.010697023,0.004944151,0.19242568,0.0013188495,0.00018092887,0.0010110282,0.0001636519,0.3999782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721648,0.00372955,0.0023716944,0.004148741,0.00022458937,0.000037431633,0.0001766004,0.000083813335,0.017062787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695706,0.0005436588,0.000101247504,0.00021084292,0.0014415563,0.00074554805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895191,0.0026245385,0.00065025693,0.0002209361,0.0056623383,0.0013227577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037400615,0.0004292979,0.00029330098,0.0062764627,0.018433003,0.012505624,0.0011651232,0.0018825918,0.005076915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0152454935,0.00035316782,0.00043903256,0.007528933,0.012691163,0.0060521616,0.0017589211,0.0020979443,0.00030754128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015667173,0.000053404397,0.034278132,0.0005268689,0.000029577775,0.0008924507,0.38354376,0.0005424956,0.0033576076,0.41925716,0.062185537,0.09517626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019459278,0.00003546288,0.100780144,0.001237903,0.00010057733,0.0005496363,0.44986808,0.00096015277,0.0024857793,0.041958775,0.4017853,0.00021876839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.936685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9471629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.936685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09117586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05104258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66153026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238341325","doi":"","title":"The Plight of the Poor in America’s Legal System: A Study of the Incentives at Work in the Legal Representation of Indigent Clients in America","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Representation (politics); Work (physics); Legal research; Political science; Legal service; Law; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.01998958321063102,"score_gpt":0.2974197711198534,"score_spread":0.27743018790922236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W238341325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96950465,0.00012225765,0.00013960691,0.016618678,0.000015304804,0.00002535392,0.000017002152,0.0000019626032,0.013555157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972957,0.000070459995,0.000057368914,0.0014934759,0.000007248013,0.0000162795,0.0000045041465,0.0000021311414,0.0010528232],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907352,0.0048339395,0.00015774179,0.00023158187,0.00070450717,0.0033369996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740806,0.012973349,0.00501384,0.0005741465,0.0019029902,0.005455104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008319365,0.00014043432,0.00039118854,0.0013700561,0.019885551,0.0069241705,0.0016015253,0.004719142,0.004710923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034700517,0.00050294085,0.00021990933,0.0016865323,0.01211408,0.0046180165,0.006730862,0.0072166515,0.00018703598],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002608166,0.0013478709,0.24453174,0.00007682029,0.000041220665,0.0012310614,0.6403597,0.0005569178,0.0006449916,0.07367022,0.008433816,0.028844792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045433546,0.00013710756,0.12718847,0.00015157562,0.00002269329,0.000278853,0.8460595,0.00052465557,0.00020358911,0.008204939,0.017150158,0.000033092685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11766203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27608848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11766203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009720913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017289009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23395431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2393279832","doi":"","title":"Analysis , rethink and enlightenment of the Australia forensic accounting standard","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Research Guide","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Forensic accounting; Certification; Business; Salient; Quality (philosophy); Enlightenment; Political science; Law; Public relations","score_opus":0.14358298922993992,"score_gpt":0.5111671379609292,"score_spread":0.3675841487309892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2393279832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5622211,0.0036712042,0.035599027,0.12650622,0.0021090468,0.0008371922,0.00023146819,0.00021344397,0.26861128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8751842,0.0018375758,0.04207511,0.012955246,0.0002869262,0.00021051793,0.00015987952,0.0001010766,0.06718956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97802585,0.006371325,0.0015290851,0.0010189458,0.011600179,0.00145455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96552116,0.010945462,0.001985572,0.0025744892,0.017902918,0.0010703561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028961286,0.00022759996,0.00028495718,0.004521608,0.0046565114,0.0054665883,0.0013719936,0.002046581,0.0015219983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04992237,0.0004513937,0.0005134135,0.0022777996,0.004998965,0.0037872146,0.004305929,0.0046191276,0.00026461727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003753817,0.00013681248,0.018397355,0.00026199644,0.000020308578,0.0007662024,0.05609023,0.0010601456,0.0028583694,0.6885102,0.030998249,0.20086263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019136593,0.00026430303,0.1321239,0.001685345,0.0000889636,0.0008021054,0.043442246,0.009706619,0.0065085613,0.08664883,0.71849656,0.0002134309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11389184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17773728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11389184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017706882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039106432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22645783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395863224","doi":"10.14221/ajte.2016v41n5.1","title":"Ethics Education in Australian Preservice Teacher Programs: A Hidden Imperative?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œAustralian journal of teacher education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Medical education; Subject (documents); Teacher education; Graduate degree; Research ethics; Service (business); Psychology; Pedagogy; Medicine; Library science; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.08652072818380713,"score_gpt":0.435686180424501,"score_spread":0.3491654522406939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395863224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.862563,0.0073949243,0.0027658518,0.0973171,0.0003446808,0.00013321823,0.000037980986,0.000045823825,0.029397361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98825616,0.002934229,0.001761576,0.0035227088,0.00010226327,0.000099896824,0.000022650966,0.000012238931,0.003288273],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885338,0.0065451968,0.00042486368,0.00050811935,0.0021099388,0.0018781206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94324183,0.021245468,0.0071890103,0.002373711,0.0063045477,0.019645352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013031255,0.000116399286,0.0003428704,0.0013148417,0.0050129355,0.004907806,0.0015564486,0.0016848762,0.0041815587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041079383,0.0003562336,0.0001712347,0.0017707936,0.007308747,0.004066428,0.0062585277,0.0029241187,0.00038223472],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013728968,0.0009503863,0.14946142,0.003430516,0.000026851612,0.0012365526,0.30594137,0.0003589744,0.0027603141,0.052486047,0.012224675,0.47098562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031529737,0.00078273093,0.4487306,0.0039016325,0.000023699897,0.001436915,0.36173385,0.00060990656,0.001068042,0.019758638,0.16185568,0.00006676456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018556735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050671212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018556735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006238243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035280664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06891674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399619157","doi":"","title":"Legal Design Lawyering: Rebooting Legal Business Model with Design Thinking","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Design thinking; Vision; Value (mathematics); Legal ethics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Management science; Political science; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09707466619086988,"score_gpt":0.29299932040154697,"score_spread":0.1959246542106771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399619157","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04761378,0.001580442,0.7653449,0.03874251,0.00068123714,0.0005524637,0.000040692415,0.0010296257,0.14441429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39261368,0.0013669248,0.57822394,0.0041030217,0.00014913661,0.0004136624,0.0000645182,0.0003806327,0.022684386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.977545,0.016885573,0.0007214652,0.0013127053,0.0027715575,0.0007636275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97832537,0.013438297,0.0010403189,0.0043161632,0.0016695826,0.0012101857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021745397,0.000609429,0.0005920798,0.0021651736,0.0038922892,0.01387593,0.0025072217,0.0031038357,0.006858112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01980028,0.00073105213,0.0008715957,0.0010354532,0.024737911,0.015020878,0.010116134,0.0057251765,0.0013092908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027271313,0.00020999117,0.0009618338,0.0004217747,0.000014519973,0.00024449683,0.062510505,0.0022800653,0.0017725365,0.79936683,0.006798972,0.12539119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058801637,0.00017658948,0.000570183,0.0009600395,0.000025868489,0.00067402684,0.028655425,0.009646227,0.002500488,0.5814847,0.37517312,0.00007456347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017416584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029434452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021745397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056473576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009834587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115002036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2402247281","doi":"","title":"Plagiarism in law and medicine: challenges for scholarship, academia, publishers and regulators.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Scholarship; The Internet; Political science; Law; Public relations; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.058265321829857546,"score_gpt":0.3688328104415253,"score_spread":0.3105674886116678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2402247281","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010780158,0.046635006,0.00023253674,0.10611316,0.84409565,0.000027450298,0.000031470543,0.000046887977,0.0027100304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013166113,0.05043732,0.00035827968,0.03820198,0.8999411,0.000036657195,0.000030682906,0.000039979448,0.009637335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847814,0.003222072,0.0024814338,0.0008328755,0.008256169,0.00042616267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88115203,0.07800001,0.004611539,0.0017137378,0.0291944,0.0053283083],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013457516,0.0019126111,0.0034803848,0.005755846,0.0047512976,0.012469661,0.003790762,0.020825084,0.005734073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072436914,0.0010076924,0.0017027323,0.0036548923,0.005450567,0.008070091,0.0021992205,0.014765993,0.0048613464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000143566085,0.000012282201,0.00003566185,0.0007106963,0.000017365006,0.00015665841,0.00015127572,0.000017957163,0.000058930844,0.00087755546,0.9745482,0.023399092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019700976,0.00004173008,0.0002869592,0.0017543085,0.0000435495,0.00038441774,0.0003637904,0.00007024595,0.00007879112,0.0021750922,0.9947584,0.000022957818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024992279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008997729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9791749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044336854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008049955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071171045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404646225","doi":"10.1017/s1472669616000384","title":"Law Student Views on the Principles of a Legal Research Website: a User Experience Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Legal education; World Wide Web; Social media; Legal research; Website design; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.206851155249746,"score_gpt":0.4848951830574395,"score_spread":0.2780440278076935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404646225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980862,0.000062308885,0.00046701322,0.00017549361,0.000005052526,0.00003591472,0.000019605928,0.000020998055,0.0011274985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970372,0.00012347697,0.0012047103,0.00019987223,0.000010097854,0.00004485618,0.000042039057,0.000019546025,0.0013182801],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920122,0.004992209,0.000471265,0.0004031885,0.0015666315,0.0005544397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9444701,0.041495107,0.0026507722,0.0016899123,0.006088252,0.0036057753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012078135,0.00029336667,0.00067483465,0.0016916872,0.0016519662,0.0041535012,0.0008205512,0.0017096455,0.0030921942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037478723,0.00054058916,0.00051493157,0.0010588347,0.001601623,0.0032136373,0.0023338532,0.001638232,0.00073880516],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050753454,0.0056072036,0.18157196,0.000408233,0.000094739895,0.0030962408,0.7066492,0.00046731136,0.010102468,0.0010305813,0.003719841,0.08674468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014745045,0.008908039,0.22161043,0.00037700415,0.00016731973,0.007981156,0.7017861,0.010748514,0.008576284,0.0004544926,0.03884365,0.00039952577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015493216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002271077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012078135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086257653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006085827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06387603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2410112967","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v11i1.3628","title":"LegalAve: A Centralized Website for Family Law Resources in Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.08154141549679857,"score_gpt":0.40075054305839386,"score_spread":0.3192091275615953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2410112967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070393704,0.0025029848,0.0066863005,0.009992832,0.0007493981,0.0015297616,0.037158813,0.029673424,0.8413129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18893574,0.003065137,0.039085504,0.0027292927,0.00032910804,0.0008238148,0.037645254,0.0038942785,0.72349185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991726,0.00007241008,0.000025879352,0.0000709286,0.0004408938,0.00021720197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943024,0.0006527099,0.00016554035,0.00034868106,0.001324141,0.0032065827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012497421,0.00032716483,0.00036453462,0.004422882,0.0052308384,0.004061871,0.001621722,0.0009619614,0.12551844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003295519,0.00042774275,0.00022692131,0.0059166113,0.0012113658,0.0025697777,0.002682229,0.0008630711,0.023476385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017261125,0.00025765965,0.0054745134,0.0001519995,0.000009330617,0.0005194936,0.0021484706,0.00021797084,0.0011154978,0.005797155,0.80699474,0.17714049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006479647,0.000026711139,0.015046045,0.00009887369,0.000008157243,0.00013749722,0.002553393,0.0004754728,0.0004003256,0.0009243901,0.9801926,0.00007173224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7563803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87797004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24361968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011171803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046835653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4901088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2410862563","doi":"10.3928/02793695-20090331-02","title":"Clinical Coaching in Forensic Psychiatry: An Innovative Program to Recruit and Retain Nurses","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Coaching; Forensic psychiatry; Nursing; Economic shortage; Medicine; Christian ministry; Forensic nursing; Mental health; Psychology; Psychiatry; Poison control; Medical emergency; Political science","score_opus":0.049856104522750494,"score_gpt":0.5237357448429186,"score_spread":0.47387964032016816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2410862563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8936467,0.001015031,0.012375985,0.016520076,0.00048971805,0.008788187,0.00020196047,0.0009559258,0.06600653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8141013,0.002773449,0.08489717,0.006426477,0.0005758076,0.007047551,0.00055947946,0.00008744873,0.08353131],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937075,0.00015262593,0.000017840248,0.000063120584,0.00020780815,0.0001878719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833655,0.00006575571,0.000082251565,0.00004654323,0.0001374763,0.0013314604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009974901,0.00041382882,0.00013168615,0.0005942491,0.003987607,0.0007691698,0.0013294321,0.00082617614,0.004965349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012459535,0.00019024147,0.00018299281,0.00040194998,0.0007998099,0.00045862098,0.0027637423,0.0010536892,0.0010102123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029631384,0.0150045715,0.013901453,0.0002770913,0.000014161491,0.00082612905,0.0076928646,0.0004888008,0.0067750015,0.0007938069,0.04970529,0.9042244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029668221,0.024469377,0.4831937,0.00066916324,0.00012643017,0.0050470117,0.022294128,0.005262644,0.007994574,0.0022973947,0.4454376,0.00024116381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039516937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26976943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039516937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026915695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021525927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07857382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412281662","doi":"10.1007/s11016-016-0094-5","title":"The burdens of proof","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metascience","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of technology; Philosophy of biology; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Burden of proof; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049007268483185595,"score_gpt":0.3966685613835482,"score_spread":0.34766129290036263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412281662","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005738743,0.016844844,0.060323272,0.4791047,0.006877415,0.00018062296,0.000504831,0.00019672757,0.43022886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60139894,0.011815674,0.046479315,0.18021917,0.02985076,0.0015993124,0.00038377274,0.0005480174,0.12770505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9415726,0.029300248,0.002455358,0.0067713126,0.017607942,0.0022924945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7748299,0.16699415,0.0074732,0.029091679,0.018729456,0.0028815707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054649014,0.001366093,0.0026917537,0.0050253207,0.00853193,0.013363677,0.003731525,0.025307488,0.032280862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21279135,0.0014644538,0.0019652103,0.002438052,0.05172028,0.03319859,0.008314851,0.028761394,0.006660234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025157535,0.0000122221845,0.00010817774,0.00004342668,0.000015599204,0.000033215234,0.00023620036,0.00007470527,0.000029659137,0.9774165,0.018294401,0.0037107351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039051152,0.000009946497,0.000119992816,0.00014973819,0.000014046339,0.00008580719,0.00013931669,0.0003328317,0.000073157804,0.94480157,0.05421774,0.000016789572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029091309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002172243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054649014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007916409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007408002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28901505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412917091","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v5n1p89","title":"The Strange Death of the Law Merchant - Part 2","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.2952731238550575,"score_gpt":0.5336090160142496,"score_spread":0.2383358921591921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412917091","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05388614,0.017018285,0.001991832,0.457715,0.026457144,0.00017447707,0.00020899106,0.000092768416,0.44245535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40292993,0.008508548,0.00069675833,0.15757905,0.010785135,0.00018541579,0.00017279308,0.00016190385,0.41898045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686265,0.00074016233,0.00011839524,0.0004042153,0.0010309559,0.0008436747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976763,0.00077529595,0.00022288259,0.00022455913,0.000374385,0.0007265661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030899944,0.0004618594,0.00054006925,0.00080393,0.011303166,0.006457261,0.0010612862,0.011313674,0.011539284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008905321,0.00044653175,0.0007581226,0.000657979,0.013562003,0.005629232,0.0074462895,0.017015813,0.0020566941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007984937,0.000077703575,0.0017958625,0.00016152645,0.000021004096,0.0040869815,0.030521188,0.00020882025,0.0013380668,0.50980645,0.42829868,0.023603909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000909352,0.00006184932,0.0039785667,0.00037066286,0.000009346082,0.0024436666,0.01728114,0.000080260485,0.000799273,0.03727932,0.93763363,0.000053080723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010699713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015635185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011539284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004610758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063261995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03860271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2413024958","doi":"","title":"The Power of Lawyer Regulators to Increase Client & Public Protection Through Adoption of a Proactive Regulation System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Power (physics); Professional conduct; Law; Political science; Business; Work (physics); State (computer science); Control (management); Public relations; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Engineering; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.02467145242439611,"score_gpt":0.31137065185377805,"score_spread":0.28669919942938193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2413024958","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061123546,0.0039364593,0.107513934,0.5040524,0.0019058643,0.00047247333,0.000041356925,0.0014155195,0.3195384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80710274,0.0010119353,0.029230043,0.1346479,0.0012446607,0.0005624726,0.000022481596,0.00015810457,0.026019603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9006209,0.048161734,0.0027551542,0.012245329,0.02978288,0.0064340895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8858656,0.063321225,0.011090398,0.0140518015,0.018615045,0.0070559215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06785781,0.00045592352,0.0004887904,0.00206059,0.009345501,0.020027045,0.0034997,0.014883373,0.0042484542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08517123,0.0011715741,0.0012596054,0.0009935318,0.02124587,0.012531082,0.010470514,0.017676543,0.0013705394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006184431,0.00052862114,0.010846301,0.0002616318,0.00012170199,0.00034435547,0.021032415,0.0016456451,0.0047764024,0.8070768,0.042074602,0.11122974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036567953,0.00077373366,0.012963599,0.0012774206,0.0002849579,0.0007122868,0.009863321,0.007661592,0.008917475,0.372072,0.5846626,0.00044538014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008315975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010320274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06785781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00924661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03182943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3588707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W241377492","doi":"","title":"Examining the Limits of Free Expression through Canadian Case Law: Reflections on the Canadian Library Association's Code of Ethics and Its Supporting Statement on Intellectual Freedom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Intellectual freedom; Law; Ethical code; Context (archaeology); Statement (logic); Political science; Sociology; Freedom of association; Freedom of information; Human rights; Censorship","score_opus":0.19651357000822958,"score_gpt":0.42563469105890167,"score_spread":0.2291211210506721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W241377492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0834208,0.027579881,0.013601513,0.4276294,0.0018379776,0.00029539762,0.00022627633,0.000071474504,0.44533736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9032945,0.014261673,0.009136053,0.044169724,0.00041465223,0.00028620526,0.000099273624,0.0000868326,0.028251017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94758254,0.02099113,0.0017293546,0.0030612072,0.018453702,0.008182135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8672624,0.10398402,0.003551378,0.0020657615,0.019723086,0.0034132753],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05386989,0.00072286907,0.000864233,0.008007205,0.05736868,0.034292944,0.0058171377,0.013338137,0.00443379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092630334,0.001056642,0.00085369707,0.011854696,0.08454212,0.015842253,0.013596641,0.01666887,0.0002905329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007996136,0.000012203599,0.00057679706,0.000079090896,0.0000035618255,0.0004568172,0.07155527,0.00026682948,0.00007114106,0.9066962,0.012908354,0.0073657655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030752133,0.000020697598,0.002858383,0.0017600467,0.000037114536,0.00046704384,0.18381214,0.0017327152,0.0003669129,0.22649507,0.5822178,0.00020120456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9633324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9768198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96570706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25114223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26333502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8685689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414452567","doi":"","title":"Alternative Business Structures Proposals or Solving the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Legal profession; Business; Agency (philosophy); Population; Legal research; Legal opinion; Law; Legal service; Law and economics; Duty; Political science; Public law; Private law; Economics; Sociology; Black letter law","score_opus":0.0326546833478117,"score_gpt":0.3530976705772484,"score_spread":0.3204429872294367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414452567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04267607,0.0019789059,0.08873947,0.19594781,0.0025780722,0.0005273126,0.00018854465,0.0005139624,0.66684985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5801042,0.0030191564,0.090822496,0.043949544,0.0021569137,0.0009624423,0.0002938965,0.00037581852,0.2783156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884586,0.0034323013,0.00031944393,0.0011597918,0.0046751974,0.001954722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98993814,0.0037344855,0.00073422154,0.0018943725,0.0020281936,0.0016705444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007660388,0.00062470953,0.00037142067,0.0013510333,0.0044215256,0.008133756,0.0039056446,0.009396806,0.027818846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020812666,0.00044896972,0.0009145801,0.0013403913,0.011938651,0.011773209,0.006603042,0.006656702,0.00468927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011928053,0.000038598606,0.00014840378,0.000033871474,0.0000026393034,0.000071044095,0.0004050718,0.00024158042,0.00017197074,0.97493094,0.010854907,0.013089121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008100896,0.00009919521,0.0005671332,0.00021803506,0.000013680852,0.00023045723,0.0020914914,0.0023930694,0.00068806414,0.44555616,0.5480171,0.00004459674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062802173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011558634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027818846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007229183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016360566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093063354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2420130340","doi":"","title":"Ontario's Community Treatment Orders: how did we get there and where do we go now? An advocate's perspective.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08689503484553078,"score_gpt":0.3426574971885026,"score_spread":0.2557624623429718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2420130340","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0088459635,0.0031954774,0.00027175198,0.9352245,0.0009976353,0.000045353892,0.00014918867,0.000022831504,0.051247325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3887421,0.014106797,0.0024623086,0.44853634,0.0017830152,0.00013516517,0.00019188158,0.00009090472,0.14395154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899609,0.0016229433,0.00040373547,0.00037632784,0.0043507065,0.0032854748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744588,0.006373805,0.0013668203,0.00034020384,0.0092622,0.008198256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007957579,0.0003053757,0.00036864728,0.0009639384,0.03036512,0.00991838,0.0029110073,0.016653845,0.010832398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031582266,0.0004800757,0.00050386915,0.0022369237,0.010440608,0.0039652786,0.0033720534,0.013529044,0.00060244306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048289763,0.0000775478,0.010445561,0.00034515304,0.000024658355,0.0015806184,0.029159773,0.00024249917,0.00032797322,0.21405162,0.71656144,0.02713489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046864076,0.000032012944,0.013371135,0.00062509516,0.00004571469,0.00033801008,0.037438992,0.00027196523,0.00016248057,0.011696283,0.9358656,0.00010589888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97632706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99438924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8994459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10055413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3711893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7295747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2422399802","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of the Ontario Legal Aid Plan and its effect on the service delivery of the McQueston Community and Legal Services","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Legal service; Service (business); Business; Service delivery framework; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Political science; Marketing; Geography","score_opus":0.01941092974986131,"score_gpt":0.23521312105688738,"score_spread":0.21580219130702608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2422399802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52141404,0.004520267,0.0019035887,0.1758626,0.0005811085,0.0008878533,0.004960672,0.00023084189,0.289639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91773397,0.0014679792,0.0021148445,0.0050396095,0.00011280818,0.00017826585,0.00077683834,0.00006180841,0.072513886],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99147934,0.0014011083,0.0002164582,0.00027275106,0.004322392,0.0023080795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794714,0.0033145624,0.0013935418,0.0004859694,0.007180207,0.008154425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060432297,0.00019295653,0.00019708258,0.0025128138,0.0056583197,0.0047168173,0.001545439,0.0019553923,0.009418078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02501653,0.00056519057,0.00034916023,0.003562433,0.003111921,0.0013733467,0.00212362,0.0017748803,0.00057565654],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007460723,0.0005575719,0.2644493,0.0007227334,0.00014706062,0.0008888154,0.0197262,0.011014361,0.0023152526,0.17780238,0.22827317,0.2933571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012305108,0.00021485041,0.7174476,0.0002454289,0.000049475955,0.000112736605,0.0097239595,0.0034631426,0.00040022208,0.0023625582,0.26577142,0.00008554028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9820732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15632804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15632804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22624817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9785399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2422873215","doi":"","title":"The Relationship between Education, Crime and Place in Justice Policy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Economic Justice; Social policy; Population; Administration of justice; Intervention (counseling); Social change; Political science; Public economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Criminology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.035891877378939945,"score_gpt":0.39694722748907213,"score_spread":0.3610553501101322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2422873215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5585541,0.004329786,0.021977179,0.07710648,0.0002873897,0.00008873048,0.00022165426,0.000032620148,0.337402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99688953,0.0005005783,0.00055356656,0.0003982009,0.00006648826,0.000009309782,0.000008854261,0.0000035013716,0.0015699575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975745,0.0012511533,0.000063102256,0.00014344562,0.00034114093,0.0006266048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938769,0.0034100485,0.001075613,0.00019220133,0.0005358733,0.00090941996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014659147,0.00023549974,0.00030205568,0.0021658703,0.0022637101,0.0047702594,0.0007233439,0.0012105204,0.005352085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00569064,0.00014231782,0.00030276927,0.0021602055,0.014071252,0.0032356158,0.004626217,0.0022274759,0.00018386275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033660814,0.00014300125,0.042062968,0.00008568623,0.000026309093,0.00022166535,0.0025961169,0.0028193148,0.000119242744,0.92587715,0.0008014043,0.02521349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003405092,0.00027190035,0.19008832,0.0005942425,0.000058774705,0.0003828852,0.016202556,0.0051461523,0.0007006279,0.71509564,0.07131527,0.00010954131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015749576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022773875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015749576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048146234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031057175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034932733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2424580818","doi":"10.1016/s0197-2510(07)70017-7","title":"10.1016/s0197-2510(07)70017-7","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Bar (unit); Code (set theory); Computer science; Programming language; Engineering; Geography; Mechanical engineering; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.020015890308392893,"score_gpt":0.28835579083708307,"score_spread":0.26833990052869017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2424580818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003846746,0.00030129313,0.00048782502,0.00041092638,0.00021890276,0.00008167209,0.0005720424,0.00070396153,0.9968387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005305508,0.0001351542,0.0002701379,0.00018592176,0.000043187003,0.000048880334,0.00030834688,0.00012940746,0.99834836],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991792,0.00006247385,0.00007101869,0.0002640139,0.00023194416,0.0001913628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782526,0.0005817901,0.00015622213,0.00023694016,0.00044203014,0.0007578091],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012729598,0.0025046077,0.001862447,0.0029717274,0.002907834,0.004448217,0.0033975323,0.0074512176,0.990375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023082593,0.0010480634,0.0014699334,0.002650696,0.0022673307,0.0057274,0.0037329525,0.0027102127,0.9932359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030448398,0.00023819845,0.0011043929,0.00057772285,0.00003339196,0.00028036418,0.00016205326,0.00036596035,0.0014520537,0.007865799,0.35995463,0.627661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047587822,0.00010751248,0.00070266245,0.00035774236,0.000012292187,0.00033187374,0.00017104605,0.00019704468,0.00028460097,0.0008189785,0.9969478,0.00002082339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005317383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042986977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009625018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014584186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019112891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013728917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2427652008","doi":"","title":"How Scholarship Programs Impact Students and the Culture of Law School","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of legal education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Quarter (Canadian coin); Class (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Legal education; Law; Higher education; Political science; Mathematics education; Public relations; Psychology; Epistemology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.08868440015710037,"score_gpt":0.4434720842112458,"score_spread":0.3547876840541454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2427652008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.977598,0.0004252331,0.00014367168,0.005736261,0.000059437654,0.000016332064,0.000034430992,0.000009658919,0.015977016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833006,0.00016482343,0.000038440034,0.00044960182,0.000012828244,0.000009241,0.000013077191,0.000009334144,0.0009726081],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98369265,0.009843048,0.00025000496,0.0008210793,0.0021920663,0.0032011485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98474216,0.003683325,0.0023913672,0.00058298814,0.0017210186,0.006879103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007141981,0.0002630647,0.0004027403,0.0020253148,0.00912644,0.01649987,0.0021890022,0.0017314934,0.007908092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023946932,0.0003315276,0.000350225,0.0019652776,0.0105265975,0.0056762155,0.009161706,0.003907651,0.0007139974],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016614216,0.0029675905,0.46641633,0.00010893791,0.00017659734,0.0003810634,0.4312676,0.0003449286,0.00054971705,0.035317335,0.0091704745,0.05313332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004745536,0.00031242167,0.30940583,0.00024816123,0.000058185233,0.00012738722,0.657513,0.00046007175,0.0006677045,0.009662358,0.02142179,0.000075539596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025874633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0554433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025874633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008377593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008393623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060783982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W244563248","doi":"10.26069/greynet-2020-000.202-gg","title":"Are Legal Texts Grey Literature? Toward a definition of Grey Literature that invites the Preservation of Authentic and Complete Originals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Entertainment; Order (exchange); Sociology; History; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.08399252384342462,"score_gpt":0.3382909657025428,"score_spread":0.2542984418591182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W244563248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035139855,0.072906025,0.047573317,0.17650522,0.005965367,0.000349054,0.00034763783,0.00021382832,0.66099966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8479672,0.03846828,0.0249679,0.017139627,0.009699459,0.0008019426,0.00055456895,0.00065943296,0.05974159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893226,0.0057503185,0.0006877391,0.000958268,0.0023436698,0.0009374406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96705484,0.020292459,0.0026879914,0.0031763238,0.0050068707,0.0017813992],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014390916,0.0010736443,0.001725456,0.021094203,0.015107865,0.040383145,0.003190476,0.008399396,0.0061823023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026550557,0.0006799615,0.0006644692,0.017883336,0.09097596,0.04244104,0.013538854,0.008539989,0.0020384486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024612527,0.0000040759273,0.000065169144,0.00004655541,0.0000011586894,0.000053202493,0.017086225,0.000025357307,0.00003416249,0.9776399,0.0022028456,0.0028387383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005731231,0.000009344069,0.000319988,0.00089840265,0.0000060233892,0.00015385526,0.028241213,0.00025255626,0.000073580675,0.7838938,0.1861326,0.000012900448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004921051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004316825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95961684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011989397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007950392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08698958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461290031","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002496","title":"In Pursuit of Pragmatic Legal Theory","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Legal positivism; Epistemology; Tort; Positivism; Economic Justice; Principal (computer security); Sociology; Legal formalism; Legal realism; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Legal research; Comparative law; Black letter law; Computer science","score_opus":0.034640150205082126,"score_gpt":0.3431281907909138,"score_spread":0.3084880405858317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461290031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034778933,0.30991927,0.022264035,0.49475735,0.0058927163,0.00007337773,0.000058768223,0.00004824047,0.16350834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46289617,0.29579824,0.025236458,0.12859458,0.025750209,0.00068279065,0.00020058086,0.00033013034,0.060510926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864162,0.008449854,0.0003618653,0.00094979163,0.003241153,0.00058115885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985441,0.010675947,0.00057477265,0.0006899147,0.0022261962,0.00039212432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012408619,0.00064982113,0.00087017834,0.004066996,0.005062503,0.009250442,0.0016449741,0.006901848,0.0036439884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02353697,0.00040303773,0.00070992444,0.0035931945,0.03421558,0.016153721,0.003834807,0.0086487755,0.00093313016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048886873,0.000007006823,0.0000418915,0.00018402541,0.0000043826344,0.00003885123,0.0021755171,0.00010661874,0.000037835023,0.9584929,0.028182913,0.01072318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008287512,0.000009822066,0.00018675708,0.00080096227,0.000004657913,0.000089084715,0.0020341126,0.00025105185,0.000066679066,0.6300724,0.36646503,0.000011121097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00752113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008376725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012408619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010293886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010157885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07468772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461479954","doi":"","title":"New developments at the University of Ottawa Community Legal Clinic.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal service; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Library science; Political science; Family medicine; Medicine; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10146995134018985,"score_gpt":0.33919369667282817,"score_spread":0.23772374533263832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461479954","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028342376,0.09862881,0.0015019333,0.63151866,0.020043325,0.0002667823,0.0011652199,0.00039166037,0.21814117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30789337,0.10538833,0.013671729,0.09977959,0.007566687,0.00035575204,0.0015778221,0.0003575694,0.46340913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913823,0.0016248528,0.00032194506,0.00060586573,0.003685348,0.0023797187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676733,0.002002945,0.0010448666,0.0007103762,0.009577799,0.018990763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004681523,0.00048195856,0.0002810924,0.002867021,0.014692454,0.008037106,0.002936688,0.0047485903,0.047328427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008768521,0.00051278743,0.00066894264,0.0030653921,0.0066869035,0.004435582,0.003506783,0.0040702964,0.0038742884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011781526,0.0002958602,0.012510997,0.00092168356,0.000024306386,0.0017367132,0.013046014,0.00014985495,0.000826163,0.034149885,0.67276853,0.2634522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001882157,0.000051266277,0.016069595,0.0004101355,0.000017077231,0.0006658394,0.008862561,0.000040808693,0.00013816664,0.0009624199,0.97272027,0.000043047236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88096255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11903745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061938547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14008348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44939768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W246332609","doi":"","title":"Overview: The Rules of Professional Conduct and Their Application to the Legal Profession Online (and Off)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Scope (computer science); Permission; Legal profession; Political science; Law; The Internet; Professional responsibility; Public relations; Ethical code; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04065679517265434,"score_gpt":0.40141510232599137,"score_spread":0.360758307153337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W246332609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059623043,0.19600101,0.14553164,0.09658798,0.004214775,0.000537396,0.0009224092,0.0002554466,0.5499872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36949882,0.35033783,0.14151303,0.028883602,0.008817823,0.0016038,0.0013523638,0.000346397,0.09764638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98543173,0.0055756136,0.001348692,0.00089540315,0.005917091,0.0008314401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982314,0.01086322,0.0013610816,0.000937566,0.0041928664,0.0003312825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010692674,0.0008222798,0.0006689121,0.0051940447,0.004154237,0.01213684,0.0014009465,0.0069363257,0.00448091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017630402,0.0009183602,0.0006529627,0.005433812,0.014862992,0.00829621,0.00255195,0.008154085,0.0021549975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004581186,0.0000085338825,0.00024307187,0.00016919043,0.0000029979494,0.00004338197,0.001300915,0.00024012021,0.000047459114,0.95747447,0.018100567,0.022364644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044169474,0.000021337635,0.0016933652,0.0016394441,0.000011830785,0.00037108187,0.0014782038,0.000764977,0.00018898971,0.39693913,0.5968479,0.000039327446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04802104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040503096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04802104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00798838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014701741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095483065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466979818","doi":"10.5623/cig2015-408","title":"Geomatics And The Law Are Professional Misconduct and Negligence Related?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Geomatics; Law; Political science; Criminology; Engineering; Sociology; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.06463142997028548,"score_gpt":0.37380071437431034,"score_spread":0.30916928440402486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466979818","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41067785,0.013291813,0.0029309315,0.42840472,0.00095288496,0.000050927316,0.0002300657,0.000042522242,0.14341833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98807913,0.0030434423,0.00026644644,0.005862683,0.0004968863,0.000015832362,0.00003893351,0.000007579965,0.0021890562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99104977,0.004433142,0.0003465439,0.0007069516,0.002023783,0.0014398723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93289495,0.035615493,0.020339247,0.0021836916,0.00510979,0.0038568985],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058095125,0.00023463058,0.00045202105,0.0049968595,0.0029739493,0.0060644615,0.0011505302,0.0062483675,0.011826292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07481979,0.0002586532,0.00041119396,0.00400632,0.022858681,0.006671768,0.0030913695,0.004120077,0.000761455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018751425,0.00057115476,0.2470621,0.0003125224,0.00013579712,0.0015027924,0.019512169,0.0007396845,0.0003051513,0.60083795,0.018275274,0.110557966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004670894,0.00018920531,0.2834354,0.0008603408,0.00010304353,0.0023228072,0.04615602,0.0011771745,0.0003697884,0.6115244,0.053731278,0.00008383237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017818537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014517429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99375165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006186754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010868392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044888258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469770150","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n5p309","title":"A Survey of Discretionary Position in Fiqh and Objective Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiqh; Discretion; Law; Punishment (psychology); Sharia; Constitution; Code (set theory); Political science; Jurisprudence; Islam; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03496799594705648,"score_gpt":0.37278807103743167,"score_spread":0.3378200750903752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469770150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96828866,0.0037254808,0.0006737317,0.0016904927,0.000025150905,0.000025596186,0.0002116484,0.000005278909,0.025353983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951853,0.002432,0.00028657736,0.00016937293,0.00001981312,0.0000107174965,0.00015119609,0.000004275601,0.0017407002],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843055,0.00038925553,0.00014478088,0.00013256552,0.00066954206,0.00023339356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99576557,0.0016485464,0.0014174028,0.0001096134,0.0006614702,0.0003974522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015678401,0.00008886822,0.00016883136,0.0022743412,0.0011777988,0.0014624456,0.00023368887,0.00037587853,0.0036776143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065860897,0.00011288583,0.0001307405,0.003402459,0.0013180075,0.0023325977,0.0006256221,0.00072362524,0.00027390834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066759174,0.0001719483,0.70688695,0.00039539603,0.000024604595,0.00042257426,0.052588712,0.00013355789,0.0007974661,0.03622869,0.004600849,0.19768251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020754678,0.00006792143,0.9114873,0.0002595263,0.000008278564,0.00050401967,0.043364357,0.00019171322,0.0001267737,0.0025016952,0.041470617,0.000015738746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069672787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010159108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069672787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014388832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001545403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013853431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470589052","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n5p1","title":"Public Interest in Criminal Procedure and Its Challenges: An Attitude toward Iranian Criminal Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.2800798921199548,"score_gpt":0.4101240211181587,"score_spread":0.1300441289982039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470589052","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20361759,0.021313583,0.006633222,0.5230429,0.0036202557,0.0001188699,0.00003084796,0.00006405754,0.24155869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94634026,0.0057490985,0.0018070556,0.03300423,0.0013867754,0.00003104867,0.000012125496,0.000016194865,0.011653228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957307,0.0018696095,0.000116305484,0.00040053346,0.001195926,0.0006868824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975682,0.0011170964,0.00036634537,0.00008288092,0.00053041836,0.0003350436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058637676,0.00029699615,0.00023221145,0.00133586,0.00916572,0.009060935,0.0010068412,0.0072984505,0.0022496488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044477778,0.000208816,0.00040157273,0.0013002477,0.021410484,0.0071155103,0.0037066876,0.0093635395,0.00026070667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023602815,0.00013010052,0.0042618616,0.00016070467,0.000008187637,0.0015580154,0.11361491,0.00024373738,0.0008582894,0.81733817,0.022594396,0.039208066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022008908,0.00017586193,0.009991689,0.00059611566,0.00002266272,0.002460266,0.2362702,0.0014887095,0.0005961682,0.18456376,0.56372267,0.00008983964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008695529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008282761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00916572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008777984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008697404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06368905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472793850","doi":"","title":"Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Secondary Sources: Journal Articles","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.30778865034820946,"score_gpt":0.47744964868658135,"score_spread":0.1696609983383719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472793850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012249502,0.005277502,0.0008667768,0.014587681,0.0021651627,0.001101638,0.100531444,0.0019013144,0.87234354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041357507,0.0044206297,0.0027819644,0.0015501687,0.00026452995,0.00047189684,0.01844015,0.00064053957,0.9672945],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499303,0.0002546912,0.0003501742,0.0002909902,0.003511045,0.000600149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95559037,0.005325,0.00078755035,0.0010081601,0.033394434,0.0038945363],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041980254,0.0013737928,0.0012954329,0.025737977,0.010083226,0.012251444,0.0026633104,0.003580852,0.5442271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02891368,0.0012390274,0.00087590615,0.029621542,0.0023862498,0.0041703694,0.0022737754,0.0023281744,0.16304867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009054336,0.000013657618,0.0001398028,0.00023733248,0.0000014006022,0.000014769772,0.00012826541,0.00002762132,0.000028099188,0.003266177,0.9780738,0.018060034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012679839,0.000003904751,0.0023000976,0.00044043077,0.0000047572576,0.000016965154,0.00043944313,0.00005006979,0.000097874945,0.0008893311,0.99572647,0.000018142673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9308491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9720986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5442271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04569539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21694241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65010464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474067469","doi":"","title":"La contribution des blogues Juridiques à la connaissance, à la critique et aux transformations du droit (The Contribution of Law Blogs to Knowledge, to the Criticism and to the Transformations of Law)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Blogosphere; Political science; Criticism; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.017330205173058593,"score_gpt":0.3568818185004466,"score_spread":0.339551613327388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474067469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6073338,0.006772467,0.0018654753,0.04508368,0.0009818522,0.00008991333,0.0010366694,0.00012157155,0.3367145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94925517,0.0021875696,0.0002873517,0.0012807904,0.0001627023,0.00002773455,0.000118400385,0.00005200164,0.04662821],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751866,0.0008840217,0.00006393123,0.00024869526,0.0008130146,0.00047161043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98768973,0.0055121826,0.0011401934,0.00060601666,0.003644967,0.0014068892],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032036281,0.00031349895,0.0002763138,0.003591283,0.0146352,0.013518261,0.0007630116,0.0014414418,0.014032705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011865626,0.0002285738,0.00015135796,0.0055738883,0.012192002,0.004833321,0.003231876,0.0022030156,0.00093099225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013181417,0.00007432536,0.051387485,0.000568196,0.000028850214,0.0016077077,0.637396,0.0003076998,0.0016183782,0.15807183,0.04390951,0.10489815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015935251,0.000038383616,0.11279752,0.00075135456,0.00003123886,0.00037797453,0.342101,0.00037949983,0.00078189414,0.0059303106,0.5367122,0.00008267695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68314314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76572305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021967025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022544239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6374458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475256900","doi":"","title":"Patching the Gaps: Improving the Regulatory Capacity of British Columbia's Water Dam Safety Program","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.01756590143165898,"score_gpt":0.24544534883439784,"score_spread":0.22787944740273886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475256900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46224266,0.0023266878,0.005783598,0.27450445,0.0005085966,0.00073516136,0.0003889866,0.0006684745,0.25284126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8962519,0.001154912,0.0063059703,0.021569295,0.000059568276,0.00032430707,0.0002467897,0.00010150266,0.07398567],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98938155,0.0029072699,0.00022483055,0.00075514603,0.003436063,0.0032952013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9525785,0.013456131,0.0013047343,0.0015508856,0.018989535,0.01212019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015217142,0.00026091206,0.0003176281,0.0016044208,0.018075796,0.0077427886,0.0039673885,0.0037024955,0.009922675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033276282,0.0005158657,0.00020310428,0.0013080469,0.005129583,0.0023496253,0.0064381845,0.0042713606,0.00093127345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002772716,0.0009587562,0.051241267,0.0005495117,0.000047011345,0.0015361356,0.056131113,0.004889134,0.006806212,0.05924258,0.29900685,0.5193143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017305386,0.00036245308,0.13427198,0.0013282858,0.000084137755,0.0002329696,0.08661037,0.0077295937,0.0039823083,0.015129255,0.7498077,0.00028784783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90261626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.964517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9426615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057338458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28019196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4160216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475980159","doi":"10.29173/alr346","title":"Where Have All the Women Gone?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Assertion; Evening; Theme (computing); Law; Pleasure; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0714492684876857,"score_gpt":0.38427062855629535,"score_spread":0.31282136006860967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475980159","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074930056,0.044104364,0.00057388085,0.8433175,0.01658346,0.000040652565,0.00025192273,0.00009884242,0.08753648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19992821,0.03874472,0.001304705,0.31116694,0.0036247938,0.00014773793,0.0002258198,0.00023387474,0.4446232],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674195,0.0009781264,0.000048863618,0.0003257887,0.00071560923,0.0011896961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623543,0.00046982546,0.00023686356,0.00011379707,0.0010009555,0.0019432027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003706726,0.0005461403,0.0007331829,0.0010572184,0.017784612,0.010637551,0.0014926412,0.0038107976,0.046436805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008122061,0.00032954017,0.00039947787,0.0014382984,0.007946737,0.008222686,0.0035918765,0.006767321,0.011043533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071258124,0.000044562825,0.0074377307,0.00033383156,0.000018995472,0.00056282716,0.06273554,0.000024725954,0.00026901334,0.07269411,0.7136689,0.14213859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048033726,0.000020014682,0.0030054268,0.00047058894,0.0000069651715,0.0001871048,0.070251785,0.000007661477,0.00007807525,0.003347673,0.9225996,0.000020289599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15909994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27716652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15909994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00923282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015648915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31634772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476109507","doi":"10.29173/alr37","title":"A Canadian Law School Curriculum for this Age","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Law; Legal profession; Gilded Age; Curriculum; Legal education; Legal history; Practice of law; Sociology; Legal research; Political science","score_opus":0.030375680868129747,"score_gpt":0.3692208836466652,"score_spread":0.33884520277853547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476109507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02063864,0.013147432,0.006472489,0.10951773,0.00719586,0.00071870565,0.0012087767,0.0007124071,0.84038806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19629525,0.024519367,0.035688113,0.035105042,0.0010830205,0.0004982476,0.0023781445,0.00019604301,0.7042368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826604,0.000087900444,0.00003480094,0.00012240764,0.001017088,0.0004718643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652773,0.000104037565,0.0001081281,0.00008995538,0.0017034648,0.001466787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014391574,0.00032339827,0.00021659938,0.0024099387,0.008237469,0.0035618776,0.0016471925,0.0018211545,0.031412933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029475316,0.00019988345,0.00035487692,0.0020898986,0.0015448336,0.0012971831,0.0016056532,0.0020521453,0.0033312822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011436342,0.00018839244,0.0032697513,0.000252408,0.0000038768553,0.0001452773,0.0028386412,0.0002625234,0.0011789169,0.108632736,0.5792179,0.30399808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003565975,0.000010563519,0.008534354,0.00009979174,0.0000024712565,0.000033043645,0.00079455134,0.000053793112,0.00006633427,0.0012005591,0.9891928,0.000008045143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93405056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98239833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94562006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05437996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20170711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39455605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479919938","doi":"10.1080/15700763.2016.1170153","title":"Law and Education Inequality: Removing Barriers to Educational Opportunities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leadership and Policy in Schools","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Racial bias; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Racism","score_opus":0.2087072750178341,"score_gpt":0.4363714931070776,"score_spread":0.22766421808924353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479919938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5159357,0.0014125519,0.015378247,0.21387136,0.00086899404,0.00020995147,0.00012663584,0.00019079754,0.25200576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856858,0.00019894521,0.0026340934,0.0037015227,0.00021885206,0.000119349206,0.00002161783,0.000027980543,0.007391927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835656,0.007476027,0.00035825328,0.0009981478,0.0022840474,0.0053179436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9431206,0.02811303,0.0041255,0.003415212,0.0033560204,0.017869703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012352064,0.00039453182,0.0007321174,0.0021356053,0.008671397,0.009571673,0.001992066,0.0037044694,0.029291445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051384844,0.00041451838,0.00073032867,0.0015359962,0.008416221,0.008873523,0.020401586,0.005665509,0.0012404952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016520431,0.002552269,0.046563394,0.00031854506,0.0000495397,0.0005240823,0.041075207,0.0010686049,0.0007432132,0.66365343,0.030232519,0.21305406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032568377,0.000750622,0.11385157,0.0029559499,0.0002151883,0.00042767596,0.12079732,0.0038549872,0.0016078172,0.5763576,0.17873017,0.00012532755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009472604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02805942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029291445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035436235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09798968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480981911","doi":"10.29173/alr115","title":"Justice Bertha Wilson: One Woman's Difference, Kim Brooks, Ed (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2009)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Law; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.07215943427084963,"score_gpt":0.372604035804014,"score_spread":0.3004446015331644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480981911","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005531261,0.65773654,0.00024699306,0.26957485,0.0068356274,0.000017051787,0.00008555443,0.000034311823,0.06491598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028442625,0.50190914,0.0008853081,0.13752177,0.005780697,0.0000813941,0.00015963723,0.00010602447,0.32511345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978891,0.00048061975,0.0000670406,0.00019122547,0.0010338044,0.00033806215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830747,0.0005787551,0.0001081707,0.00004274929,0.00058808894,0.0003746908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019927504,0.00083902327,0.00052759785,0.0019208237,0.010163923,0.0073461463,0.0014988027,0.006068436,0.0105100665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005131978,0.00062594505,0.00035151414,0.0025742634,0.0039016255,0.004799176,0.0016301546,0.00550649,0.0046392404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003636909,0.0000074712393,0.00014355154,0.00006109738,0.000002145895,0.000063325315,0.00096088974,0.00001680351,0.000020661004,0.00669964,0.9701872,0.021833602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026771659,0.000002501822,0.0010006845,0.00039401662,0.000004193817,0.000089569214,0.0018845389,0.000012912496,0.000025895835,0.0035819234,0.9929939,0.0000071219383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41607842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7221302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58392155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014338431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030022338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8273131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482431587","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199336265.003.0006","title":"Copying and the Case of the Legal Profession","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Legal profession; Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Supreme court; Legal ethics; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.04428897900099107,"score_gpt":0.3820775970686914,"score_spread":0.33778861806770033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482431587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024084907,0.002603149,0.0010946499,0.010489335,0.00021528147,0.000026798023,0.000014239179,0.000022023785,0.9614497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7907657,0.0028913226,0.00085177936,0.0028721713,0.00034730893,0.000034713757,0.000027482116,0.000037690123,0.20217197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918508,0.0019930971,0.00013583017,0.0005223603,0.004144662,0.0013531087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99409205,0.0036319722,0.00024068762,0.000723743,0.000870082,0.00044146372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003968858,0.00032662784,0.0003400301,0.0020526005,0.015019748,0.010386956,0.0019475993,0.0043716184,0.010194691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009983377,0.00024420812,0.00029076677,0.003070171,0.049465384,0.0049059456,0.005866954,0.004443863,0.0007533406],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031928964,0.000010827275,0.00016222252,0.000011940277,8.482825e-7,0.00025894545,0.02090866,0.0001250293,0.00006393556,0.9636985,0.005437592,0.009318348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010980477,0.000016163438,0.0014590451,0.00035596715,0.000009320076,0.00047140385,0.021426499,0.0008147513,0.0004696097,0.3224778,0.65244734,0.00004113756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41979614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41282746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41979614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030184759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027475221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8347053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482883559","doi":"10.1108/s1521-6136(2010)0000015006","title":"Freedom, social control, and the problem-solving court movement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Sociology of crime, law and deviance","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Originality; Dignity","score_opus":0.025113516342568375,"score_gpt":0.3213802030389978,"score_spread":0.2962666866964294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482883559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05036787,0.01228621,0.0028359739,0.017576406,0.00024754478,0.000038121278,0.000012197789,0.000016180185,0.9166195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525157,0.0048528193,0.00079800165,0.0014608568,0.00019111935,0.00004886479,0.000018452803,0.000015374639,0.04009887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770784,0.0013508957,0.000043752163,0.00014658683,0.00044221847,0.00030873413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986506,0.0008418431,0.00014746335,0.000097966724,0.000090583075,0.00017155075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020468992,0.00026816616,0.00017466804,0.00091456925,0.0045060394,0.005751435,0.0005848695,0.0010805046,0.0056833792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018118541,0.000089648725,0.00021843525,0.0012122443,0.046071537,0.0026805063,0.0030801569,0.00251465,0.0002684762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002636713,0.000017121434,0.00030964016,0.000023129473,0.0000014033262,0.000054281714,0.01585173,0.0001172343,0.000034893135,0.9704971,0.0019064962,0.011184433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001661912,0.0000345549,0.0044790735,0.00044176483,0.0000040451723,0.00022602077,0.023540014,0.00051414355,0.00024674396,0.6383253,0.33215368,0.000018093484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010067446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008851128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010067446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056018387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005457675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484709572","doi":"10.1017/als.2016.44","title":"Mapping the Ecology of China’s Corporate Legal Sector: Globalization and Its Impact on Lawyers and Society","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; China; Emerging markets; Politics; Political science; Economy; Economic system; Political economy; Business; Law; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.041003776972666495,"score_gpt":0.3384627227278139,"score_spread":0.2974589457551474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2484709572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932099,0.00026336356,0.00015601052,0.0005573955,0.0000029271255,0.000012832358,0.000056329372,0.0000032430653,0.005737996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937767,0.00015510223,0.00011428781,0.000035884488,0.0000031911131,0.000004348029,0.00002492482,8.4753634e-7,0.0002836779],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959344,0.0001434868,0.000012794816,0.000060304203,0.000081700506,0.00010831252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990983,0.0002733763,0.00024411362,0.00004698805,0.00014624339,0.00019090036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005789279,0.00014516478,0.00018520546,0.0038077522,0.0016921157,0.0022610065,0.00032683872,0.0003217545,0.0026814651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095719175,0.00013323923,0.00013541344,0.0052954233,0.0026791568,0.0015708728,0.0020609314,0.00034792727,0.00006766628],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035256206,0.00011135659,0.86390543,0.00012844338,0.00003261434,0.00096766785,0.048105586,0.0009428758,0.0018591089,0.031269472,0.0011221948,0.05151999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003179506,0.000042995394,0.9456189,0.000060492013,0.000010972586,0.00008719286,0.04360847,0.0014390871,0.0002503074,0.002922431,0.005944069,0.000011878266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051901177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09874324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051901177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042964006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038932299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10319811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2486934769","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12214","title":"Undermining Gender Equality: Female Attrition from Private Law Practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Attrition; Private practice; General partnership; Private law; Law; Legal practice; Legal profession; Private sector; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Demographic economics; Psychology; Public law; Economics; Social psychology; Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.21529411336071347,"score_gpt":0.46049147773448973,"score_spread":0.24519736437377626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2486934769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83664554,0.047031797,0.0019002303,0.06644344,0.0004810509,0.00007764309,0.00028468604,0.000014455817,0.04712125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97774976,0.014402779,0.0002582169,0.0040567024,0.00024642024,0.000034642933,0.00006953452,0.000008252079,0.0031737115],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537754,0.0023665656,0.00016063465,0.00035037816,0.00107146,0.0006733284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99079716,0.004503466,0.0022166043,0.00028161376,0.001052756,0.0011483756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068542156,0.00008895903,0.00026338996,0.0006961553,0.0011213864,0.0010815489,0.00058974116,0.00057965866,0.0045638992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019988691,0.00011347802,0.0002679576,0.00081772194,0.0012001839,0.0014406822,0.0016842715,0.00078551203,0.0003229161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013160407,0.00012490635,0.38301623,0.00087965565,0.00007036181,0.00053083757,0.027619258,0.00015921997,0.00038943853,0.022075102,0.017161291,0.5478421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033535885,0.00031288216,0.82323927,0.0027689293,0.000075341915,0.0013934502,0.03699772,0.00035389705,0.00052690343,0.005852883,0.12842095,0.000024314904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012057704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027723059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012057704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013239168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040627667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03624904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492462256","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316337875.004","title":"A Theoretical Excursion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Legitimacy; Legal profession; Political science; Professional responsibility; Politics; Economic Justice; Morality; Practice of law; Legal realism; Scholarship; Meta-ethics; Sociology; Professional conduct; Nursing ethics","score_opus":0.06880234756513501,"score_gpt":0.30818353957069394,"score_spread":0.23938119200555893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492462256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035670465,0.0097960755,0.017318169,0.19048457,0.006301657,0.000057168476,0.00014589616,0.00011041603,0.77221894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39761928,0.02531514,0.02126593,0.108603105,0.014110491,0.0008443419,0.00060493615,0.00042550455,0.43121132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978194,0.0011662034,0.00006499004,0.00028236175,0.00049206225,0.0001750107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982475,0.0009381351,0.00008427067,0.00021031022,0.00030304433,0.0002167409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020320767,0.0007738523,0.00044177647,0.0021615762,0.0045775436,0.0071488554,0.002220426,0.0042054434,0.028729158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004162408,0.0002535153,0.00059940957,0.0014003202,0.017716505,0.0076302993,0.005725991,0.0061718076,0.0066826227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003082114,0.000010897146,0.00002853943,0.000025797664,9.286826e-7,0.00005599971,0.0014508254,0.00005587786,0.000029300349,0.9731093,0.021270506,0.0039588553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057323864,0.000012309923,0.0000820611,0.00023791441,0.0000016115812,0.00014941151,0.0034848838,0.00034000148,0.00006586642,0.5988229,0.39679134,0.000006032003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00259708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028771234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028729158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046577025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029717684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096108675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494750886","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2016.1181035","title":"Women Lawyers and the Struggle for Change in Conflict and Transition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Transitional justice; Acquiescence; Rebuttal; Nexus (standard); Agency (philosophy); Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Transition (genetics); Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.10247198104516073,"score_gpt":0.39089551098388947,"score_spread":0.2884235299387288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494750886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81138676,0.005611635,0.002081037,0.082996495,0.0003844109,0.000062636456,0.00002230726,0.000058778303,0.097395904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925734,0.00035987294,0.000114164424,0.0016528978,0.000038934424,0.000015870255,0.0000038283733,0.000010158183,0.0052308403],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98463213,0.009878825,0.00017056549,0.0006280903,0.0008894471,0.003800885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939699,0.0030156767,0.00077183946,0.00024194074,0.00034603008,0.0016546189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073786355,0.0003389507,0.00070699153,0.0016130428,0.034924928,0.017844984,0.0017084262,0.0051386724,0.0072733914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014888379,0.00043222608,0.00032167564,0.0013863754,0.05340836,0.008126277,0.015551597,0.0064050835,0.0005546763],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020438467,0.00003389216,0.002504589,0.000023450884,0.000004132105,0.00074063265,0.94747037,0.000033246106,0.00011913056,0.04042041,0.0021670274,0.006462754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008870022,0.00002702031,0.001089501,0.00006834591,0.0000028778543,0.0004176884,0.9279439,0.00004096996,0.000078061516,0.008960994,0.06135137,0.000010431555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009740335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013787634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034924928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008559298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070474995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062102377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495216519","doi":"10.1016/s1059-4337(08)45005-6","title":"Legal aid's logics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in law, politics, and society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Government (linguistics); Liberalism; Political science; Legal research; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.12893596371585034,"score_gpt":0.4129553029186293,"score_spread":0.284019339202779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495216519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011751956,0.0019458791,0.0024019752,0.0073353625,0.00009648412,0.000053854947,0.00016107906,0.000051860792,0.97620153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7384527,0.0024607833,0.002440176,0.0020633184,0.00007571635,0.00009622679,0.00013006665,0.000053584386,0.25422752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978415,0.000367359,0.00004413332,0.00025847796,0.00080270885,0.0006857948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989127,0.00028972354,0.000057990314,0.00008131719,0.0003881752,0.00027012645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022793035,0.0002869482,0.00023971839,0.001526197,0.014311205,0.011466354,0.0014420231,0.0015180375,0.009473906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025509417,0.00028600154,0.00022664928,0.0029204395,0.030552052,0.0028299866,0.0028743178,0.0025149349,0.0006916321],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026393543,0.000002001201,0.00014947294,0.000012534983,7.730475e-7,0.000033127297,0.0056861797,0.0000663009,0.000039245693,0.98422444,0.005630534,0.0041527012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010159661,0.0000067108754,0.001872335,0.00017103457,0.000008198291,0.00007068511,0.013598832,0.00033783654,0.00017106849,0.10621698,0.8775154,0.000020713931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8929384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9367136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8929384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11342441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10095008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82295555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497896655","doi":"10.18848/1833-1882/cgp/v05i10/51909","title":"The Scientificity of Social Sciences: Questions Raised by Research Ethics in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences Annual Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Research ethics; Social science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.2883822687489082,"score_gpt":0.5544134037461772,"score_spread":0.266031134997269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497896655","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020307902,0.115861386,0.0022517885,0.7958758,0.0017605937,0.00012232515,0.00022614167,0.000037782695,0.063556306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7584128,0.10991605,0.0070158835,0.10953118,0.002813488,0.00025803433,0.00018087565,0.00016985783,0.011701935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.86902195,0.046570916,0.0079651065,0.0056478754,0.059173997,0.011620139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43130735,0.37832445,0.017520787,0.008508043,0.13341133,0.030928034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14895219,0.0006057933,0.00291617,0.012747294,0.027058989,0.027728947,0.0066779936,0.013758067,0.004340976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36197555,0.001345592,0.0013302864,0.019088335,0.05316515,0.009631341,0.008890889,0.013703495,0.00031315934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002189414,0.00010898303,0.01850841,0.0027372595,0.00035736617,0.00071758754,0.021341706,0.0013529938,0.00027311436,0.7430858,0.083275594,0.12802218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043532663,0.00011442949,0.07526235,0.012578868,0.000547894,0.00058277696,0.030892324,0.0037144613,0.0009798604,0.396929,0.47750065,0.00046214496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9791942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98824173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98624194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22220974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6074268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90212643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502426375","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511558696.020","title":"The conditions of India (cont.): doctors","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Accidental; Drag; Mechanics; Physics; Acoustics","score_opus":0.05553307180212803,"score_gpt":0.28542933254052855,"score_spread":0.22989626073840053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502426375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002468217,0.17818187,0.00028195113,0.07113269,0.03238928,0.00009678493,0.0023039465,0.0004758041,0.71266943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02152259,0.052844945,0.00025919467,0.037870046,0.0066251205,0.00008375292,0.00085407525,0.00016808455,0.87977225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997502,0.000038574242,0.000015290136,0.000029590738,0.00010742141,0.000059049526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997676,0.00006942988,0.000022445642,0.000014099995,0.000073507625,0.000052984444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017633222,0.0005918062,0.0003400085,0.0011285379,0.0021314176,0.001930655,0.0005246843,0.0018620746,0.09499296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071836927,0.00035413,0.00028439373,0.001916542,0.000649871,0.0017640541,0.001687406,0.0020477322,0.040514328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067795654,0.0000069716625,0.00011752335,0.00015881145,0.000001050634,0.000067461144,0.00065755815,0.000027699387,0.000052199728,0.002803876,0.9788759,0.017224213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002138435,0.0000068436384,0.0011249976,0.0001980606,0.0000017873907,0.00016054402,0.00051077985,0.0000079725605,0.000027632257,0.00045718273,0.99749786,0.0000042722945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02360636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061475065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09499296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017204783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019016231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31778312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502837327","doi":"10.29173/alr333","title":"Re-Envisioning Regulation: &amp;ldquo;Canadian Lawyers in the 21st Century&amp;rdquo;","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Phrase; Political science; Legal profession; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08948529668300247,"score_gpt":0.379910290334667,"score_spread":0.2904249936516645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502837327","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073500993,0.10988338,0.0017975908,0.6045604,0.0061908294,0.00007092922,0.00018939203,0.00009897002,0.2698584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46464944,0.09619455,0.0039017906,0.14627117,0.003926305,0.000090779446,0.00019517912,0.00010687276,0.284664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901635,0.00157771,0.00018178782,0.00047655604,0.0057825325,0.0018179363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907616,0.0025460564,0.0003356414,0.0002313845,0.004756802,0.0013685514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074649844,0.00039345256,0.0003301754,0.0031230783,0.016741492,0.01977175,0.0018079429,0.009442014,0.007461321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013595336,0.00036930997,0.0003248896,0.0041637584,0.016764482,0.0056291544,0.002671927,0.0066313185,0.0006937823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011220685,0.000019023117,0.0011125797,0.00024890012,0.0000056174285,0.00014101616,0.013618204,0.00019831532,0.0001364296,0.574922,0.36541182,0.044174723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048202605,0.0000055242845,0.0020232843,0.00029361734,0.000007726466,0.000039064504,0.007991508,0.00011061632,0.000098831544,0.0176982,0.9716978,0.000028970451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97470516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98966926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85702884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14297114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24338831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506307306","doi":"10.29173/alr344","title":"Are Lawyers Regulatable?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Corporate governance; Legal profession; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.09495735748825214,"score_gpt":0.38935446677456337,"score_spread":0.29439710928631124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506307306","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09729847,0.027863834,0.013677452,0.52577347,0.0017108623,0.00016116691,0.00009047405,0.00020028977,0.33322403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8785058,0.0094145965,0.0023273588,0.076542795,0.0015207536,0.000252524,0.00007689849,0.0000656905,0.031293467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9576664,0.019418217,0.0013921536,0.0058730138,0.011168792,0.0044814725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92488563,0.04033607,0.013982171,0.007159138,0.010313938,0.003323053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03542306,0.00016971909,0.0005590442,0.0012849376,0.003848937,0.009172482,0.0021462382,0.0070615485,0.005476773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089199714,0.00061926025,0.00054958684,0.0013766749,0.016868645,0.008650711,0.0032692857,0.006145316,0.001653569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049023816,0.00024627752,0.021948384,0.00048356166,0.00010258359,0.00030606825,0.016175812,0.0009222122,0.0013398173,0.7594428,0.042402368,0.15658112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016623347,0.00017726708,0.037112173,0.0015988444,0.00012363488,0.0003722904,0.011961455,0.0010097759,0.0018468413,0.36764562,0.57788897,0.000096903306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009434805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00747564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03542306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060665407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014423022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18733728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508103237","doi":"10.1086/233378","title":"Book ReviewsAlan Gewirth, .<i>Self‐Fulfillment</i>. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998. Pp. 217. $37.50 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Permission; Library science; Management; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Physics; Economics","score_opus":0.0591796670968227,"score_gpt":0.36063943770693324,"score_spread":0.30145977061011053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508103237","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083294435,0.62248474,0.0025824495,0.044715993,0.012865656,0.00005901699,0.0011402852,0.00034521273,0.31497368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0075353673,0.3836095,0.0024732354,0.009249248,0.0038337666,0.00008126985,0.00097286946,0.00033162476,0.5919132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999724,0.00005157978,0.000018723213,0.000037351034,0.0001404912,0.000027899445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919504,0.000379593,0.000063472115,0.000032515298,0.0002455031,0.00008383707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042215703,0.00095683755,0.0006548342,0.0020014618,0.0011737993,0.0025142783,0.0007808849,0.0012544899,0.071848765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020103822,0.00047592755,0.0003494386,0.0021447886,0.0011962679,0.0036069208,0.00082892075,0.0023169077,0.04093398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009576769,0.000009886462,0.00005027861,0.000204123,0.0000032832047,0.000027008591,0.00018929492,0.00003739287,0.00008100912,0.008601263,0.93239,0.058396894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001945682,0.0000057315083,0.000299283,0.00036785117,0.0000046144087,0.0001241602,0.00015740874,0.00003081615,0.000071152615,0.0060572946,0.99287355,0.000006128333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007920402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02793038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071848765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016232954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018977824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24035805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509121235","doi":"","title":"Legal Services Regulation in Canada: Plus Ça Change?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Competition (biology); Independence (probability theory); Political science; State (computer science); Regulatory state; Legal profession; Law; Legal service; Financial services; Public administration; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.06529440932144626,"score_gpt":0.29974338595873123,"score_spread":0.23444897663728498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509121235","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027325865,0.05819939,0.0018879516,0.7274235,0.0033840428,0.00006803663,0.0006844203,0.00019144191,0.18083525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49862418,0.100512214,0.00727562,0.18310505,0.0016204072,0.000079300706,0.00093853957,0.00017306139,0.20767164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915411,0.0005206294,0.00017489915,0.0007083457,0.003821284,0.0032337115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890771,0.0009910791,0.0004627426,0.00023596676,0.006069035,0.0031640937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038941973,0.0004155332,0.00045718602,0.002070469,0.012685386,0.013164111,0.0020630881,0.0054127034,0.008631532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009350822,0.00039909093,0.000700055,0.0048724595,0.008786543,0.004322935,0.0022488676,0.0069189067,0.0010262473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006656792,0.000078093726,0.009494589,0.0006712128,0.000036846388,0.00074530207,0.00906193,0.00096956297,0.0008912866,0.55148345,0.2614301,0.16507098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015921218,0.000028142727,0.01351962,0.00062129955,0.000024328967,0.00012055795,0.007906606,0.00035603522,0.0003065363,0.009041171,0.9679893,0.00007045072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7643659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2356341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4760235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8865561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510232616","doi":"10.3968/8571","title":"The Choice of Paths to the Transformation of the Administrative Law Enforcement Ways From the Perspective of Consultation Administration","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Administration (probate law); Enforcement; Legitimacy; Perspective (graphical); Law enforcement; Business; Public administration; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.09130537824936233,"score_gpt":0.4425809210661275,"score_spread":0.3512755428167652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510232616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053371564,0.0032153558,0.11101736,0.1832766,0.0005598198,0.0003482866,0.000090831556,0.00021449519,0.64790577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9385931,0.0011400768,0.032690864,0.003018757,0.00011713193,0.00038431748,0.000029871277,0.000116335854,0.023909537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768122,0.016262842,0.0005140587,0.0015278321,0.0026776344,0.0022054038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98782825,0.0054335236,0.0010048468,0.0014541285,0.0024330043,0.0018462284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0124008665,0.00051347347,0.0004449802,0.0021508897,0.008715239,0.017698366,0.0016886715,0.004993871,0.00787097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015467865,0.0004987757,0.0007209813,0.0016255428,0.05601608,0.019093381,0.009568031,0.009725499,0.0011761546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008474145,0.00001926283,0.00013179658,0.000022883512,0.000002302419,0.000050172734,0.0064338436,0.00013002628,0.00006091734,0.9883808,0.0006100204,0.0041495925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003216501,0.000040024923,0.00049311173,0.00016298235,0.000006873831,0.00012519705,0.02048261,0.00063632964,0.00037298314,0.90146756,0.07614762,0.00003263485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062485947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063460977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017698366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0121808145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020977192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08837843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510525896","doi":"","title":"Barriers to Unbundled Legal Services in Australia: Canvassing Reforms to Better Manage Self-Represented Litigants in Courts and in Practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Legal service; Economic Justice; Business; Liability; Quality (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.01325277710960976,"score_gpt":0.3500922223782459,"score_spread":0.33683944526863613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510525896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51236874,0.00800368,0.009440845,0.40895844,0.0004703389,0.00033956263,0.00002695182,0.00012261348,0.06026884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613714,0.003311061,0.006970366,0.01648001,0.00015522072,0.00014427652,0.000019943767,0.000032059354,0.011515708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810736,0.008181209,0.0010417813,0.0010333991,0.004418198,0.0042516654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602383,0.010453938,0.0051575,0.0016173349,0.0059532826,0.016579565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01636643,0.00023069844,0.0003982649,0.0019727093,0.008774744,0.010924367,0.0030524228,0.0065176156,0.005834261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05038217,0.0005437606,0.00039564705,0.00151998,0.009238348,0.009627808,0.016505187,0.0067500356,0.0005567882],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006937062,0.00095456996,0.033596955,0.0013000692,0.000051606024,0.003327382,0.16042624,0.0032800187,0.0035645582,0.4580368,0.02382449,0.31156793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107876505,0.0009900065,0.13550903,0.0046594935,0.00006812593,0.0022844186,0.18227339,0.01205851,0.0015581918,0.17490485,0.48532632,0.00025975474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09718535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14846995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09718535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02090028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.107477985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19323933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511313682","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1227","title":"Book Review: Bar Codes: Women in the Legal Profession, by Jean McKenzie Leiper","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Law; Sociology; Legal profession; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.02238169356376893,"score_gpt":0.3714272858531344,"score_spread":0.3490455922893655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511313682","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008983942,0.87360257,0.00006329227,0.07218154,0.045803502,0.000024762172,0.00010394745,0.00001798249,0.008112474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013317235,0.79755807,0.00010554344,0.07883956,0.07164277,0.00009147779,0.00017896498,0.000046841633,0.050205007],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906105,0.00019401628,0.00006461165,0.00015906496,0.00044412,0.00007715684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631834,0.0019595276,0.00023144422,0.00006555134,0.0010200974,0.00040496376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010501331,0.0016696753,0.0011771399,0.0030650366,0.0017948825,0.004611209,0.0025342482,0.0063521713,0.018468756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007038026,0.00069891673,0.00047937903,0.005356991,0.0026069556,0.0043949354,0.0018192608,0.00657908,0.0114482725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060339707,0.0000059242475,0.000042862957,0.0004076867,0.0000027500487,0.000018817222,0.000047845962,0.000016460152,0.000012850392,0.00044593195,0.9856748,0.013318079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010198366,0.000011202081,0.0005577013,0.0017008929,0.0000059693116,0.00016157117,0.00011977763,0.000012979049,0.000010977423,0.00042227618,0.996977,0.000009435419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046945307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09697156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046945307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005295456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056205643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09334409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511544311","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Juries in the 21st Century, by Jacqueline Horan","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.016856877056021808,"score_gpt":0.3254235744628837,"score_spread":0.30856669740686193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511544311","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006714174,0.8125121,0.00031165502,0.09668865,0.08198666,0.000041017407,0.000106309206,0.00003698098,0.008249601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013491134,0.7348177,0.00052436645,0.13500553,0.08297671,0.00019540213,0.00019847417,0.00007485355,0.044857804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737036,0.0008082841,0.00019857219,0.0003044165,0.0012028917,0.00011554127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98881745,0.006584984,0.0006375142,0.00018538485,0.003183121,0.0005915468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031965505,0.0014242763,0.0021177551,0.0036960086,0.0016795013,0.005475251,0.0024582597,0.0066854977,0.013733534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022725143,0.0009623688,0.001004937,0.006621469,0.0032796862,0.0057966206,0.0017670097,0.009622485,0.009716736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060871052,0.0000038824287,0.000020543002,0.0003505302,0.0000049051355,0.00000879864,0.00001838315,0.000030782223,0.000009516474,0.0009385045,0.9866165,0.011991677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016913044,0.000011868113,0.00028356872,0.001971296,0.00001057819,0.00009641316,0.000048504557,0.00002889646,0.0000127120975,0.0015091017,0.99599826,0.000011871021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016203754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0343868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016203754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059326948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00803448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04594326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251452867","doi":"10.5040/9781472563699","title":"The First Women Lawyers : A Comparative Study of Gender, Law and the Legal Professions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Legal realism; Legal education; Empirical legal studies; Gender studies; Legal research; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.0786209816948372,"score_gpt":0.35738978530203214,"score_spread":0.2787688036071949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251452867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9380491,0.006798205,0.00033797417,0.009384655,0.00019847098,0.0000439965,0.00006500835,0.00001125555,0.04511128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97765404,0.0049485117,0.00021000899,0.0020346239,0.00008229256,0.00006588819,0.00003058643,0.000022717293,0.014951352],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565876,0.00248558,0.000069641465,0.00026594254,0.00049556466,0.0010244959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99388933,0.004240056,0.00049089413,0.00012364762,0.000435178,0.00082087435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004430407,0.00039888461,0.000951183,0.0034890631,0.024096394,0.0076822476,0.0014356046,0.0026876556,0.008591632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009483366,0.00062437955,0.00019633703,0.0043332935,0.014065599,0.008290078,0.0050959173,0.00448958,0.0006534751],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001674606,0.000039522965,0.0012153938,0.00003657069,0.0000014318551,0.00036306644,0.9877461,0.0000055028036,0.0001208613,0.0052303285,0.0009978821,0.004226429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028160625,0.000029314511,0.0015965415,0.00009813856,0.0000018632787,0.00015372073,0.9794924,0.0000071474064,0.0000519945,0.0003353614,0.0182267,0.0000040235004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04718376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12480492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04718376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01045885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00558572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09381825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515792880","doi":"10.20982/tqmp.04.1.p001","title":"L'établissement d'une norme de qualification sûre dans un contexte non paramétrique","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.26147689967445187,"score_gpt":0.5972320151537616,"score_spread":0.3357551154793097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515792880","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033815566,0.00043974054,0.962172,0.00062012736,0.00007921194,0.00006944203,0.00017618256,0.00026509748,0.0023625966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.502392,0.00064037315,0.49123627,0.0003108615,0.00016965116,0.00058995007,0.0005342964,0.00036215346,0.0037645183],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735994,0.015312411,0.0012534646,0.0056990553,0.003561993,0.00057372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8388603,0.13120496,0.009356452,0.014275881,0.005498442,0.0008040245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029238135,0.0012450431,0.0021654777,0.0019222823,0.001003174,0.006402896,0.0027458353,0.0022096352,0.0031410528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15513049,0.0011814557,0.0018971845,0.0022615304,0.0040861676,0.009334943,0.0042050225,0.004928594,0.0007971651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007704329,0.00029649455,0.06652836,0.0014953687,0.0011148935,0.00045804362,0.006416546,0.16400982,0.011174038,0.3572599,0.0039960747,0.38648012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006423058,0.00047344557,0.04215071,0.00061328214,0.00023794039,0.0005640695,0.0017131227,0.6314729,0.009772602,0.29758602,0.01504172,0.0003099753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058887177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004405194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029238135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024126354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00242804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15462786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516010411","doi":"10.29173/alr17","title":"Practical Legal Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies; Engineering ethics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.22583216168638956,"score_gpt":0.5565889154861124,"score_spread":0.3307567537997229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516010411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056378758,0.057651866,0.09560861,0.29495114,0.003930067,0.0011281542,0.00018870384,0.00047190022,0.54043174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32006344,0.08877128,0.30735862,0.085288696,0.006159492,0.0022602377,0.00064364815,0.00032154258,0.189133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9583804,0.025763484,0.0012927939,0.0023125175,0.010654276,0.0015965031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.935054,0.040203992,0.001701251,0.009014297,0.010870787,0.0031556669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060764857,0.00089620805,0.00068436994,0.0030626843,0.0052986466,0.0061852797,0.003336019,0.0053326203,0.020795157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065577015,0.00066659495,0.00056566345,0.002122558,0.015380304,0.0069104065,0.007547077,0.00677841,0.0056457194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015648928,0.00014471712,0.0007770533,0.0009328455,0.0000130923,0.00021186178,0.0041541806,0.00063708005,0.0006160689,0.66242445,0.12143257,0.2086404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024794786,0.00007283862,0.0010391701,0.0014669314,0.0000106597645,0.000296191,0.003499867,0.00032511062,0.0003362055,0.3238455,0.6690669,0.000015724809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011783727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028377667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060764857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009816869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033738106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32135916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517918421","doi":"10.1086/524879","title":"Book ReviewsCatherine Audard, . <i>John Rawls</i>.Montreal: McGill–Queen’s University Press, 2007. Pp. 328. $75.00 (cloth); $22.95 (paper).","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Economic Justice; Download; Permission; Media studies; Philosophy; Art history; Art; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07224834276563313,"score_gpt":0.3502776998650652,"score_spread":0.27802935709943205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517918421","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030822915,0.71581113,0.0009037768,0.024793828,0.014955717,0.00008007717,0.0019037555,0.0003718134,0.24087164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019741913,0.30590174,0.0010437949,0.0076787453,0.004491831,0.00006446282,0.0015941006,0.0002919781,0.6769591],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994753,0.00006711336,0.000029964442,0.00006894034,0.00031475103,0.00004401368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979406,0.0005742643,0.00012117647,0.00008255436,0.0010977859,0.00018354862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006426613,0.0012755413,0.001027339,0.0029968938,0.0010862754,0.0024468247,0.0012813476,0.0013574427,0.17153579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028848862,0.0006076359,0.00049280486,0.0051135183,0.00070000126,0.0027054842,0.0007430129,0.0019074216,0.10922792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033880906,0.000003967616,0.000020043844,0.00018214372,0.0000015679502,0.000010664808,0.00003047735,0.000017188351,0.000035472112,0.0007076101,0.973055,0.025932383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012584081,0.0000030317183,0.0001757932,0.0002094216,0.0000021604628,0.00006392787,0.00002813536,0.000009091058,0.000022795533,0.00030493631,0.9991763,0.000003145725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03443815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08682096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17153579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002404742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003293277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5738444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520485215","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Case Law - updated","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.3607604778427934,"score_gpt":0.5587866410292842,"score_spread":0.1980261631864908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520485215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016335268,0.013574642,0.0043447656,0.059818305,0.006581007,0.003022016,0.071610115,0.0019383547,0.8374772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008310751,0.014464113,0.018016314,0.009635567,0.0007763334,0.0021166985,0.025662238,0.00081979437,0.92019814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852733,0.0014194511,0.0013515309,0.00065923814,0.010189255,0.0011072654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88970184,0.01881529,0.0014791851,0.0032141714,0.083009556,0.0037799343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015922185,0.0011495874,0.0010741379,0.020115532,0.009940228,0.011101097,0.004371984,0.006805775,0.16437463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066401206,0.0015545476,0.0009082772,0.02740213,0.00474681,0.0048144795,0.0021822897,0.004821366,0.036763147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005594862,0.000011820366,0.00011343099,0.00018277901,8.3948345e-7,0.000011515075,0.00018615398,0.000041263625,0.00002498437,0.005756501,0.97965014,0.014015037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011739783,0.0000037914251,0.0019933456,0.00054166047,0.0000059378467,0.000019627596,0.0006874904,0.00006838393,0.00008384466,0.0020444265,0.9945186,0.000021193368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9567117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98436916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16437463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07347523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30334553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5498879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520615928","doi":"","title":"Writing Up the Facts and Winning Big: Some Secrets of the Best Writers of Legal Submissions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Legal writing; Law; Political science; Computer science; Legal research","score_opus":0.03119909141947087,"score_gpt":0.33332657387440406,"score_spread":0.3021274824549332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520615928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005113632,0.0063109854,0.0029739002,0.93124443,0.013172116,0.00002703926,0.00008184351,0.00008737833,0.040988594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56556624,0.012174709,0.013485845,0.28465015,0.03652167,0.00020795988,0.00022462397,0.0013521501,0.085816644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88994855,0.059323203,0.008652584,0.00608819,0.025785057,0.010202316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5216926,0.27804828,0.023540933,0.049161993,0.08599211,0.041564148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15785371,0.000821726,0.0018158209,0.0054867915,0.030384503,0.05736601,0.004585011,0.016537333,0.017048322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42503104,0.0019267512,0.000933328,0.0050369017,0.053823788,0.03967151,0.0143419765,0.035803463,0.0057045845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014344766,0.000059718437,0.0024179593,0.00023003823,0.00005656984,0.00023912993,0.026463848,0.00020606545,0.00018829208,0.39389488,0.5082232,0.0678769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005353524,0.00003957422,0.0015466904,0.0012319318,0.000053618933,0.00026704388,0.022122834,0.00037251587,0.0009560482,0.38981894,0.58338076,0.00015655685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053250757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014824474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15785371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008365871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02809982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83482015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522436095","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v10i1.1396","title":"Poor Justice: How the Poor Fare in the Courts (Book Review)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.1282684912989405,"score_gpt":0.46598821109252075,"score_spread":0.3377197197935803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522436095","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001785824,0.94268733,0.00005193373,0.04709737,0.0026633812,0.0000048979546,0.000048134985,0.0000039684555,0.0072643966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0063713132,0.9361359,0.00009479061,0.043949056,0.0049796593,0.000032913267,0.000060688093,0.000015106432,0.008360605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752146,0.0011043329,0.00012744968,0.0001731688,0.0008166069,0.00025694477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922814,0.0055783335,0.00054906966,0.00013042407,0.0011278198,0.0003329817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003350817,0.00066654925,0.0014437112,0.0037222921,0.002257917,0.0075034117,0.0014179582,0.008560459,0.011261671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016043713,0.00045700392,0.00074685586,0.006733378,0.007327896,0.00673958,0.0031472477,0.005676135,0.0022884684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022920087,0.000025212048,0.00044036124,0.0034917227,0.00006841081,0.000081401784,0.0011462535,0.000115816256,0.000032044733,0.038010053,0.81287766,0.14368819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020716803,0.000035834673,0.003655201,0.023295939,0.00008253612,0.0003902054,0.002530323,0.000029587763,0.00005125845,0.020459246,0.94941723,0.000031939904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043141764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13532321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043141764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005420369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0127990525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085781276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524099781","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1307","title":"Book Notes: Access to Care, Access to Justice: The Legal Debate Over Private Health Insurance in Canada, by Colleen M. Flood, Kent Roach and Lorne Sossin (eds)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Flood myth; Sociology; Political science; Law; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02739835166410391,"score_gpt":0.3560805353952432,"score_spread":0.3286821837311393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524099781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022106832,0.35098785,0.0013074022,0.42633075,0.010726751,0.000055062475,0.0015812907,0.00010993729,0.20669025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034736298,0.37416542,0.0029104347,0.063688435,0.011495585,0.00008593335,0.0010161777,0.00018819021,0.51171345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989888,0.00013454942,0.000031753378,0.00007603072,0.00064049056,0.00012828734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969194,0.0016123746,0.00010841712,0.00006122706,0.0009378958,0.0003607028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013220022,0.0009464379,0.00080107606,0.0026263103,0.0077493377,0.008812679,0.0018314265,0.0053460468,0.030276166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029792022,0.0005677041,0.00045140745,0.008642066,0.007027487,0.0052837543,0.0012619296,0.0039454107,0.005148093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040145505,0.0000072106604,0.00024082168,0.00007022568,0.0000020370746,0.00003091149,0.0008956461,0.00011439647,0.000027665023,0.017050283,0.9663745,0.015182208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007136107,0.0000070528818,0.0027414688,0.00059161225,0.000007804275,0.000101199745,0.0046660984,0.00020043131,0.00007326283,0.014766736,0.97680956,0.000027726934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8657394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96720636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1342606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020616738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035909344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2701025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524351496","doi":"","title":"LibGuides. Legal Research. How to find Canadian (Federal) and Ontario Legislation.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Public administration; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.10759323696759542,"score_gpt":0.3981531742057648,"score_spread":0.29055993723816936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524351496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020789355,0.04587465,0.00052185165,0.082839794,0.0012751636,0.00016161338,0.022254037,0.0008380032,0.8441559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01839313,0.024918545,0.0015216128,0.0074994285,0.00022515072,0.00012354691,0.004816134,0.0003031922,0.94219923],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831724,0.000112889626,0.00007637962,0.00007847861,0.0011083413,0.00030662448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99308974,0.00078556634,0.00016318531,0.00013950486,0.004766666,0.001055386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013055495,0.0005369904,0.00037929343,0.003852852,0.00854585,0.004286555,0.0014686106,0.0040738196,0.16848817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057938294,0.00056206423,0.00038986056,0.0065863016,0.0019355807,0.0028922695,0.0013764127,0.002666744,0.025672246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007146499,0.000010014543,0.0005773883,0.00012521289,0.0000013000674,0.00003913011,0.00062593253,0.00002274508,0.000031824085,0.008448535,0.94769925,0.042411637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057479074,0.0000035011353,0.0045988215,0.00031596384,0.000005662973,0.000018745832,0.0013525733,0.00004001518,0.000062710096,0.0011636555,0.9924229,0.000009725469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99569714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16848817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04664545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.115680136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56364906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526759325","doi":"","title":"Research guides: Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Treatises on specific Charter topics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16179712885603312,"score_gpt":0.4478055040233525,"score_spread":0.28600837516731936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526759325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00069963693,0.030459533,0.0060645244,0.02656195,0.0025717386,0.001386193,0.03356184,0.0010377527,0.8976568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010687175,0.03758156,0.016824756,0.008629202,0.0005674996,0.002045302,0.017295538,0.0010483471,0.90532076],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893897,0.001625515,0.00054883293,0.00050868705,0.007006184,0.0009211766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98601216,0.003154095,0.0004878272,0.000670672,0.009062175,0.00061315164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00945271,0.0012027697,0.0009834414,0.009132857,0.008525402,0.009584349,0.0030892221,0.003934914,0.09468216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019466551,0.0012669892,0.00061880687,0.016821137,0.0052479445,0.0063416525,0.0019512809,0.0063475533,0.037237447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006067616,0.000008411335,0.00006710135,0.0001622247,0.0000012472882,0.00001677444,0.00067483383,0.000044292272,0.00006480085,0.04962978,0.92936504,0.019959383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004049013,0.0000028082075,0.0005481103,0.00038518044,0.0000025582094,0.00001316009,0.00058446557,0.000021739452,0.00009161549,0.004500365,0.9938304,0.000015713329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83716047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.903409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16283953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040202286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13221976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32759702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526784809","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n8p57","title":"The Role of Jurisprudence in the Interpretation of the Law and Its Conformity with the Realities in the Law of Iran and France","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Common law; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Doctrine; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.016290494047643947,"score_gpt":0.32928795633498437,"score_spread":0.31299746228734043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526784809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3039043,0.008006936,0.07008647,0.041090034,0.00048667143,0.0002773965,0.00017030127,0.00011403398,0.57586396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894972,0.0006951054,0.005990687,0.00075633347,0.00012268269,0.00008481627,0.000027375123,0.000023962642,0.0028018134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709999,0.020346653,0.0008046217,0.0014607625,0.005377988,0.0010101523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693374,0.0246208,0.002279352,0.001246672,0.0022057784,0.00030996907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015049801,0.0002769389,0.0004303546,0.0037796646,0.0071632904,0.011327391,0.0013332068,0.0021167123,0.0015405113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026583506,0.00023932036,0.00050208636,0.003253246,0.036093198,0.006754795,0.002771403,0.0041263113,0.00022366681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070428255,0.000013742512,0.0014562537,0.000039562867,0.0000054985803,0.00017488598,0.05265979,0.000119298966,0.00013374121,0.9375215,0.00051496347,0.007353569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026322174,0.00010770767,0.021167574,0.0006154425,0.00004829344,0.00103784,0.11056116,0.00243154,0.00101872,0.66672105,0.19616203,0.00010239304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009686006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077289087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015049801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008108275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008787977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07959193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W252727322","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1306","title":"Book Notes: Access to Justice, by Deborah L. Rhode","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.042925887646550996,"score_gpt":0.39692365112351297,"score_spread":0.353997763476962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W252727322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007479319,0.17214577,0.00109509,0.38716286,0.013128272,0.00004824171,0.0007284333,0.00015633996,0.42478713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008458229,0.05717694,0.00084115594,0.05595329,0.0057508843,0.00006419265,0.0002482337,0.00018950546,0.87131757],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994286,0.00012425591,0.000032883177,0.00009873148,0.00026288774,0.000052580308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819404,0.0011097391,0.00006291364,0.00010328681,0.00036006176,0.00016990167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010376988,0.00061187573,0.0004991267,0.0012958545,0.0038935407,0.0045956494,0.000966373,0.004798463,0.056183763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003980324,0.00054856756,0.00032877823,0.001814076,0.0032291093,0.0071243695,0.0014784167,0.005970197,0.02016076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022830068,0.0000033539081,0.00003048666,0.00002005035,5.4182686e-7,0.000009218038,0.00012392433,0.000014468497,0.000019967914,0.010952337,0.98237,0.0064533367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027285457,0.000003578741,0.00027413995,0.00012707083,0.0000012210484,0.000031647716,0.0002969074,0.000024458004,0.00004004051,0.005852132,0.9933401,0.000006063343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058092274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18155195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058092274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026440711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003349645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18795341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528596893","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1012","title":"Civil Justice Problems and the Disability and Health Status of Canadians","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07411402938534853,"score_gpt":0.43890315179963635,"score_spread":0.36478912241428785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528596893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97367734,0.0016160063,0.00003257903,0.0034824654,0.00004899221,0.000041783027,0.0038692877,0.000005693527,0.017225929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960376,0.00093327765,0.000031880263,0.0002090333,0.000014322701,0.000009369544,0.000824222,0.000002221128,0.0019380528],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865365,0.00007566552,0.00004683479,0.000071944094,0.00037623395,0.00077575573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598604,0.00018869512,0.00075293717,0.00008393187,0.0015660176,0.0014222376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008184571,0.0002235031,0.00032143376,0.0034213543,0.0054106605,0.0021118743,0.0009977624,0.00072413916,0.0070353104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005243983,0.00022850274,0.00051054475,0.0062391805,0.0015739106,0.0006542195,0.001479587,0.0009790289,0.00028814565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053677188,0.00007507473,0.97936475,0.00005800872,0.000036443078,0.00016462212,0.0043562027,0.000134266,0.00005437506,0.0015021965,0.00416143,0.010038918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071050254,0.00001952907,0.98798454,0.000080701706,0.0000144556125,0.00006812085,0.0067235455,0.0001340992,0.000021047761,0.00015342326,0.0047794464,0.000014028963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99630827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029521259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029521259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04293415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21419269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W252885981","doi":"","title":"New Criminal Code Procedure for Production of Student Records in Sexual Assault Cases.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Canada","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Confidentiality; Law; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Criminal code; Parliament; Political science; Confession (law); Criminology; Criminal law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07555425503559556,"score_gpt":0.4233008312198719,"score_spread":0.34774657618427635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W252885981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019036742,0.0044223615,0.031056456,0.04315256,0.009845097,0.009636438,0.01467332,0.0039192606,0.8642577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08968095,0.0031483553,0.03653146,0.06712488,0.0016985738,0.0075791874,0.008854974,0.0008447199,0.7845369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98281336,0.0023819015,0.0020875528,0.0017209221,0.008629604,0.0023666932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857064,0.0036936745,0.0011731171,0.0016645377,0.006727371,0.0010348319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008490778,0.0010389631,0.00058460113,0.0042601055,0.006585684,0.004352196,0.0027841348,0.009820304,0.022354951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020033352,0.001058982,0.0007897226,0.0017031148,0.0025084456,0.0018891538,0.0034731356,0.0059087714,0.016953127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011892013,0.00013792556,0.0022847934,0.00021795007,0.000011982465,0.0012496553,0.001563684,0.0002751517,0.0020719378,0.101970896,0.79577565,0.094321445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008333016,0.00011920135,0.008470589,0.00048735223,0.000022458378,0.0011478947,0.0004266274,0.00064958556,0.0012807637,0.00594352,0.98126376,0.0001050152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15756653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29743877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84243345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009615435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02987651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31329882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529991557","doi":"","title":"Young lawyers: Greg May: How to stay out of my bad books","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin (Law Society of South Australia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Law; Public relations; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08265878807916936,"score_gpt":0.35845173333856334,"score_spread":0.27579294525939396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529991557","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029134082,0.02161698,0.0010697712,0.86120695,0.024716925,0.00013950013,0.00014756242,0.0006502351,0.0875386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021684589,0.018118583,0.0026939805,0.32063517,0.0051818234,0.00023204669,0.00016735714,0.0005824478,0.63070405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989027,0.00037539867,0.000031811407,0.00010505733,0.00030125,0.00028374515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99227387,0.0010065843,0.0002566196,0.00013022148,0.0011550388,0.0051776655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028381476,0.0004969877,0.0004681413,0.00089312135,0.011270249,0.008002797,0.0014542609,0.0060330303,0.0961887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012585198,0.0006853509,0.00032754964,0.00082919915,0.002310339,0.00851768,0.0037406231,0.009079996,0.055106927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036263864,0.000018578321,0.00012413034,0.00001769651,8.329322e-7,0.00007941371,0.000965777,0.000003290066,0.000018705523,0.00052816054,0.9880513,0.010188505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010511358,0.000020327207,0.0006078421,0.00022739646,0.000003788454,0.00016765966,0.012135206,0.00001635254,0.000035685604,0.001537856,0.9852239,0.000013571078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01760627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06399206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0961887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020886082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069339317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32178324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530013195","doi":"10.1177/2322005816662375","title":"Understanding University Pro Bono","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Sustainability; Subject (documents); Public relations; Business; Public administration; Library science; Geography","score_opus":0.12476259210413694,"score_gpt":0.3679861138520459,"score_spread":0.24322352174790896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530013195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25474444,0.00336472,0.018459162,0.04694158,0.00040212416,0.00014201751,0.000047381058,0.000058641974,0.67583984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842903,0.0008933464,0.0021488606,0.0013295611,0.000077217446,0.00009071546,0.00001968764,0.000014845712,0.011135644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99375916,0.003995384,0.00013473978,0.00031964047,0.00056663057,0.0012245397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99294126,0.002523934,0.0009045424,0.0003518258,0.00065547304,0.0026228947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008947629,0.00029743084,0.0002151959,0.0019054761,0.009039369,0.009970698,0.0014760105,0.0036410969,0.009306315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010030327,0.00025211603,0.00021778724,0.0013571015,0.018336447,0.015718915,0.009600883,0.004097253,0.000638798],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001089313,0.00006840284,0.0030343914,0.00006912314,0.0000019223296,0.00023835899,0.068602234,0.00038456704,0.000103194725,0.9050955,0.003009262,0.01938225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008437424,0.00009776338,0.008597835,0.00090613775,0.0000040618634,0.00044671237,0.24022928,0.0015892561,0.00026022716,0.32399654,0.42382312,0.00004068286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054210834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005975567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009970698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064820447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008043594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047320127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531336477","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Legal Information Basics - with Citation!: Find Judgments Online","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Information retrieval; Internet privacy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science","score_opus":0.07477212810864513,"score_gpt":0.37371936778415443,"score_spread":0.2989472396755093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531336477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002981221,0.00032651835,0.00075571664,0.0017719697,0.00019243272,0.00012973869,0.023023488,0.008420793,0.96508116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040794676,0.0006076803,0.0020847686,0.0011267251,0.00016110207,0.00022371049,0.01870991,0.0052398513,0.9677669],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975205,0.0001936388,0.00016345677,0.00013053392,0.0017227569,0.00026912687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99244845,0.0013613959,0.0002445553,0.0009123739,0.004245464,0.0007876721],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017221285,0.0009749101,0.0008854188,0.008153622,0.00425095,0.008663138,0.0020947612,0.0028104726,0.789261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015524697,0.001437522,0.0006616218,0.008561641,0.0011988357,0.0077655134,0.0042743506,0.0024167313,0.64619386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000751184,0.000011450541,0.00012053668,0.000067160145,9.0474134e-7,0.000017588776,0.000091690286,0.000014144062,0.00003214175,0.0033539443,0.975867,0.020415941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045233414,0.0000029452335,0.00045105262,0.00012432465,0.0000014452684,0.000026683072,0.00014718651,0.000039296156,0.00011907357,0.0021970414,0.9968736,0.000012672856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10442009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20773807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.789261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005490201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010699576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3005936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531460821","doi":"","title":"Le Programme de pratique du droit à mi-parcours : une étude empirique (The Law Practice Program at the Halfway Mark: An Empirical Study)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.02901358209643464,"score_gpt":0.38989122978422025,"score_spread":0.36087764768778563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531460821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918119,0.00036613017,0.00025674608,0.0007746375,0.000008263848,0.00028232482,0.00019527909,0.000005028479,0.006299708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947278,0.00041162738,0.0003133145,0.00021559332,0.00000931423,0.00026832707,0.00011739549,0.000005092075,0.0039316006],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923915,0.003583383,0.00027098702,0.0007176686,0.0016376668,0.0013987249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739793,0.012400582,0.0049145753,0.001194733,0.003543947,0.003966803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009286215,0.0002455834,0.00050845253,0.0018482043,0.005431784,0.0035831975,0.001786142,0.0013210978,0.008270761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021199906,0.00048816463,0.00034242123,0.002953871,0.0039838743,0.002196045,0.0030749764,0.0015526385,0.0006812844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028758094,0.003271729,0.6081573,0.00078182784,0.000120105,0.0010892272,0.29309955,0.00076770096,0.00077246723,0.0149659915,0.005049013,0.07163754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057270834,0.00064427976,0.7937254,0.0005669194,0.000047892754,0.00011870517,0.18437733,0.00065166387,0.00026560045,0.00035460488,0.019156262,0.00003413828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.597556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6947234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.597556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02637743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036476936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8096281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532444293","doi":"10.3138/utq.85.3.370","title":"<i>Truth Matters</i>, edited by Lambert Zuidevaart, Allyson Carr, Matthew J. Klaassen, and Ronnie Shuker","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Carr; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009192019271382228,"score_gpt":0.2562717885942373,"score_spread":0.2470797693228551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532444293","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006246076,0.7330083,0.0010939365,0.18049508,0.018950546,0.000020303447,0.00035435517,0.00010175976,0.06535113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035948303,0.70271343,0.0029544102,0.036198683,0.022347234,0.00010805834,0.0007959744,0.00034738233,0.19858651],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978155,0.0008220131,0.000111021196,0.00018670307,0.0008975945,0.00016722728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954318,0.0024668756,0.00040467907,0.00019663193,0.0011427639,0.00035738628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028574755,0.0012463898,0.00074201025,0.0030983281,0.0035390952,0.008961987,0.0015436984,0.0039215903,0.021283627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010980167,0.0009000032,0.00054914696,0.0052553075,0.0065546697,0.00969445,0.0023776633,0.005518771,0.009789541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000800593,0.0000053353165,0.00012773681,0.00019721086,0.000003393197,0.000025678313,0.0012485542,0.00004470573,0.000047164023,0.02109545,0.9563281,0.020868665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034266827,0.0000050896797,0.0007358934,0.00079773436,0.0000050383683,0.00006390306,0.0016959122,0.00004863826,0.000076943215,0.013854575,0.98270184,0.000010952854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07001726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1323342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07001726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009671143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015015418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13921946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532904078","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316585481.010","title":"Moving On","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0503431502450424,"score_gpt":0.2834600645682191,"score_spread":0.2331169143231767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532904078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001001051,0.004225757,0.003385004,0.053530663,0.008486836,0.00003988996,0.00009824808,0.00015187614,0.9290808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012763254,0.002287757,0.0013389091,0.015244942,0.0011527099,0.00004443124,0.00010287402,0.0002933992,0.9667718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802774,0.00055916025,0.00006218722,0.000336528,0.0006757061,0.00033866128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855155,0.0002661808,0.00004523458,0.0002640605,0.00046870837,0.00040424286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019834219,0.0007042268,0.0006491573,0.0013416959,0.0061752363,0.01188977,0.0013402093,0.0043642134,0.19825675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005594133,0.00032869863,0.00061558833,0.0009285697,0.008065329,0.013814685,0.008784733,0.009013436,0.08182281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011049277,0.000026924066,0.00007839831,0.00007570993,0.0000032826856,0.000051551604,0.0031788328,0.00005434927,0.00014662552,0.5432353,0.37945497,0.07368309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021422738,0.00000439936,0.00006808831,0.00013141561,0.0000013985878,0.00002145753,0.0012233995,0.00002225656,0.000041279847,0.03527881,0.9632011,0.0000042284755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010861944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018897757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19825675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00406126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006010614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535102255","doi":"10.3390/laws5040039","title":"Precedents, Patterns and Puzzles: Feminist Reflections on the First Women Lawyers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.07377895716760687,"score_gpt":0.3904287111053089,"score_spread":0.31664975393770206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535102255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48509234,0.020426605,0.007838087,0.21459815,0.0014939336,0.00013230614,0.00012736578,0.000082668754,0.27020848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610994,0.003415728,0.000809993,0.005431705,0.0002707671,0.00007116813,0.000024028832,0.000083383486,0.028793903],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98852366,0.008046836,0.00016337179,0.00070432696,0.0010993886,0.0014624646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98667914,0.010658563,0.0009081424,0.00027167087,0.0005841953,0.0008982105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010537704,0.0007364384,0.00076491386,0.003236323,0.031826492,0.016135227,0.0022974373,0.0059479475,0.0065897843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015210462,0.0011953646,0.00036898413,0.0027042134,0.066265315,0.01579369,0.010337529,0.014160366,0.0007191895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009930842,0.000016787992,0.00032101956,0.000024930467,0.0000011379832,0.00041732084,0.9161858,0.0000211922,0.00011692461,0.0787992,0.001580106,0.0025056058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008899273,0.000023114195,0.0006105836,0.00027021673,0.0000026143287,0.00027167329,0.8298158,0.000054129847,0.0003059741,0.016403083,0.15221873,0.000015214591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050601777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07151373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050601777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024332047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008959772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17654216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542908246","doi":"10.1080/15580989.2003.11770933","title":"The Government of Canada’s Approach to Ethics: The Evolution of Ethical Government","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Value (mathematics); Patience; Political science; Action (physics); Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Public administration; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06662587231946109,"score_gpt":0.34631464646456095,"score_spread":0.27968877414509985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542908246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018523395,0.015296584,0.0077652493,0.6212737,0.0014817137,0.0000483365,0.000072784016,0.00007760345,0.33546066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85661113,0.009319412,0.0075254343,0.06109203,0.00049132004,0.000055088505,0.000045637364,0.00010914568,0.06475082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846128,0.004930433,0.00028281563,0.0009476466,0.005961997,0.0032642044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813819,0.0057675955,0.00091454556,0.0008352734,0.0062342533,0.004866476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007568726,0.0003585544,0.00037282973,0.0027926047,0.031923883,0.02026124,0.0016982412,0.008767146,0.0030962934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014126185,0.0004015239,0.00044095647,0.003562142,0.078379594,0.004573469,0.0044187685,0.011691351,0.00025843407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048990764,0.0000071934674,0.0007831435,0.00003108934,0.000004153785,0.0001033399,0.007645575,0.0002628729,0.000053181022,0.9620644,0.020094743,0.008945392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012284542,0.00001772108,0.0057891603,0.0005109296,0.000013132604,0.00021476019,0.015035368,0.0009571926,0.00021980968,0.20813087,0.7690211,0.00007770285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9556989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9716926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20785482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20785482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28045654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91877615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543070789","doi":"","title":"FROM COLLEAGUE TO COP TO COACH: CONTEMPORARY REGULATION OF LAWYER COMPETENCE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Normative; Corporate governance; Political science; Scholarship; Law and economics; Law; Public relations; Sociology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.03837694845004135,"score_gpt":0.349075462012789,"score_spread":0.31069851356274764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543070789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18967201,0.008011613,0.02988957,0.17341946,0.0005769115,0.00014596843,0.00008517494,0.00020762981,0.59799165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96498305,0.0017279753,0.0017785749,0.00919708,0.00011295056,0.000047153775,0.000020140942,0.00004665818,0.022086509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847627,0.004350512,0.00027043687,0.0024251197,0.005142968,0.0030481657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98689353,0.0048846193,0.0014078573,0.00093309267,0.0030919814,0.002788898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010092816,0.00026592458,0.0003161863,0.002045504,0.019825982,0.014133519,0.0028718738,0.0052869255,0.0050130137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020535799,0.00048131836,0.00035466772,0.002048043,0.042957474,0.0047963616,0.006573918,0.0064901323,0.00052697514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014768102,0.000036704718,0.0043686815,0.000077880606,0.0000069753655,0.0002508475,0.07482424,0.00039426287,0.00050819345,0.8694942,0.013281442,0.03674181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028122295,0.00010689009,0.025100866,0.00097662,0.000026964364,0.0003810095,0.12108155,0.0028487516,0.0010997076,0.16679311,0.68135947,0.0001969735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6608158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74298865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6608158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0697025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07712581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6823635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2544355193","doi":"","title":"Why Australian universities are just not good enough","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quadrant","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"League; Work (physics); Higher education; Political science; League table; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Management; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.07420150671135405,"score_gpt":0.3719525630206353,"score_spread":0.2977510563092812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2544355193","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034941435,0.00885317,0.0011807998,0.81622654,0.0071355733,0.00006128407,0.00015826628,0.00023843568,0.13120452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54088473,0.0077235363,0.002819478,0.2773689,0.0020582734,0.00014675996,0.00015067893,0.00032875672,0.16851898],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780594,0.0076641547,0.0006915938,0.0012784277,0.0072276997,0.005078798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9361828,0.005910368,0.0022857802,0.0029774203,0.019717598,0.032925993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016189218,0.00033100997,0.00059203355,0.0018041254,0.0154703045,0.015588513,0.0018811363,0.0075663873,0.0359432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045441944,0.0005516704,0.00062835147,0.0024886027,0.011412893,0.013054083,0.011243761,0.007730558,0.009875048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107996406,0.0002230636,0.011109147,0.0006731057,0.00006924747,0.0005790977,0.021026142,0.00013828135,0.00062162045,0.13553843,0.7327055,0.09720839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027654603,0.00010856702,0.015154038,0.0005725518,0.000024248084,0.00030191668,0.020525537,0.0001226374,0.00023977601,0.024667548,0.93818974,0.000065886736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05329702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07522356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05329702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011389895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025746908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546110508","doi":"","title":"Dark Night of the Soul: A Review of Anthony T. Kronman's the Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Legal profession; Law; Excellence; Ideal (ethics); Meaning (existential); Political science; Elite; Legal education; Soul; Quarter (Canadian coin); Professional responsibility; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03258664799654275,"score_gpt":0.4122315221351373,"score_spread":0.37964487413859455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546110508","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003158017,0.99684334,0.000012674429,0.002344498,0.0004755457,0.0000013655668,0.0000033831934,7.572431e-7,0.0002868753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00054725975,0.99624133,0.000039220253,0.002240032,0.00068898645,0.000004263557,0.000007422448,0.0000014671236,0.00023004094],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893314,0.0003601614,0.00015835038,0.00011865088,0.0003688578,0.00006072011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939731,0.0039160303,0.0005047608,0.000077451296,0.0012182831,0.000310333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026501906,0.0006165498,0.0013593944,0.0053705913,0.0009282646,0.002511252,0.0010428096,0.002525576,0.002467409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00875143,0.00039835644,0.00058146863,0.0073104077,0.0017455244,0.003377309,0.0014211804,0.0037525923,0.001191869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061386396,0.0000825438,0.0003853342,0.044576988,0.00016841808,0.00026451345,0.0019150266,0.00014884475,0.0002777743,0.01782154,0.35596237,0.5783352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006796404,0.00003952267,0.00078995986,0.028268967,0.00006255713,0.0004182458,0.00048285484,0.000017242482,0.000049506016,0.0020085094,0.96784,0.000015814383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063330405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01641423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063330405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019613432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006266635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014230669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546427331","doi":"","title":"African Canadian Legal Clinic","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.05831755114846584,"score_gpt":0.4152948657748903,"score_spread":0.35697731462642446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546427331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03591972,0.0052734995,0.0005540015,0.110874735,0.0045615993,0.0003763888,0.0015069589,0.00025208967,0.840681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09620787,0.00283701,0.00078295346,0.016895477,0.00062262797,0.00006476569,0.00020493925,0.00012222366,0.8822621],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830306,0.00011649725,0.000039806357,0.00018029616,0.00044986545,0.00091053155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568236,0.00029743073,0.0001059401,0.000086488464,0.001089759,0.0027379657],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009026242,0.00068460056,0.00047510513,0.0026205808,0.033349212,0.0045356215,0.0021562458,0.0046366057,0.38664478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00478529,0.00063506956,0.0005284973,0.0020124556,0.003245061,0.0013479892,0.0033514174,0.004263444,0.033171166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012603738,0.00023372444,0.009630846,0.00022815852,0.000029087378,0.018212914,0.0023879018,0.00023755386,0.0006655409,0.031270836,0.8497949,0.08718248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000431445,0.000048651917,0.008813636,0.00034718582,0.000019408362,0.007208798,0.006259186,0.00019996082,0.0004696114,0.0039215805,0.9726178,0.000050926126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7609065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96154445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38664478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028659983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.072012976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8748768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546811838","doi":"","title":"Developments in Canadian Law and Law Libraries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016100528342176457,"score_gpt":0.24260238267579054,"score_spread":0.22650185433361408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546811838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034354884,0.027510172,0.0016989738,0.42798316,0.003075042,0.0001415638,0.0009948045,0.000568684,0.5036727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47702074,0.023550067,0.004355119,0.075674914,0.001359221,0.00011552892,0.000693241,0.00035658386,0.41687462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789752,0.0029747712,0.0006163149,0.0013524801,0.0080881715,0.007993058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545003,0.006548576,0.0013809793,0.0010386689,0.019682033,0.016849386],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013212118,0.0007722339,0.0008313575,0.0117836725,0.046036664,0.03341374,0.005370069,0.011996325,0.05851949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027828434,0.0010495705,0.0010118999,0.022835976,0.018832527,0.00957515,0.008402145,0.009211458,0.0029793652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007436375,0.000120148885,0.0032774268,0.0004972529,0.000023641618,0.0004976766,0.012240153,0.000676613,0.00035341247,0.6302113,0.24715887,0.10486912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013344283,0.000019086041,0.008672719,0.00030420293,0.000015639585,0.00008649565,0.010238855,0.00028558692,0.00020055758,0.007706605,0.9723857,0.00007126721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99325985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96658623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.39182305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5809117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70539904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548941087","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1057","title":"Women's Voices Being Heard: Responsive Lawyering","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04631599057308432,"score_gpt":0.4110980670236919,"score_spread":0.36478207645060756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548941087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5862784,0.0053057787,0.0033495154,0.12750731,0.0021939815,0.0002383386,0.00003342721,0.000104927865,0.27498838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560372,0.0018750323,0.0007918656,0.0072836517,0.00022473805,0.0000898944,0.000015077446,0.00002681138,0.033655666],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99245036,0.005046797,0.00010837079,0.00030230184,0.0006605824,0.0014316041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940031,0.0029175763,0.0005300022,0.00018368004,0.0003782185,0.0019874258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064833746,0.00031555453,0.00026731938,0.00058151357,0.013998085,0.007634334,0.0014432431,0.0036072822,0.012947405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013290249,0.00028678737,0.00024120221,0.00045783847,0.010433304,0.004050343,0.011037655,0.004213555,0.0010536155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027431972,0.00016092142,0.003136782,0.00015863671,0.000006395682,0.0018026652,0.90125793,0.000034733064,0.0010213464,0.02422648,0.01221035,0.05595633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013156975,0.00009756816,0.0023268922,0.00026421354,0.000007856913,0.00038409932,0.8871628,0.000053069256,0.00029062436,0.003365941,0.106020585,0.00001319768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009468091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028419174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013998085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048329313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009196809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043313384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552043116","doi":"","title":"A Look at Parent Discipline Strategies over Almost a Quarter Century: Some Good News","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AAP News","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; History","score_opus":0.038229599943524394,"score_gpt":0.37083378997619953,"score_spread":0.33260419003267516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552043116","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006291636,0.035975825,0.00013902587,0.9289852,0.025462165,0.000005893738,0.000110977104,0.000036038888,0.008655814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01724953,0.05752664,0.00052829453,0.84251785,0.061412532,0.00004390518,0.00027033556,0.00016632637,0.02028466],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940883,0.0012916295,0.0004422659,0.000546393,0.0025153211,0.0011160802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9573107,0.025207495,0.0028814387,0.0013978347,0.0071787434,0.006023833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010010692,0.0006680988,0.0007564746,0.0021938633,0.004330577,0.012232393,0.0017674302,0.023611933,0.01615541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038558044,0.000611435,0.0009191603,0.0030565145,0.0060668336,0.011631366,0.003222207,0.032392543,0.004041552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006576659,0.00004781633,0.00060793624,0.00020537512,0.000018702836,0.00021475027,0.00057678716,0.000030206029,0.0000767378,0.00860786,0.9361539,0.05339414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029418628,0.00003521288,0.0025464923,0.0010886353,0.00002331528,0.00021255657,0.0013883872,0.000034729528,0.00011058631,0.0033486069,0.9911505,0.000031604803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0133195575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024550352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023611933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053001097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062029734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05404526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555335037","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12246","title":"Discussion Law &amp; Society Review at Fifty: A Debate on the Future of Publishing by the Law &amp; Society Association","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Conversation; Law; Association (psychology); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04928845214196659,"score_gpt":0.35682921533799017,"score_spread":0.3075407631960236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555335037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009621122,0.009331131,0.00028353772,0.9648534,0.009000182,0.0000072499724,0.000027106067,0.000015595973,0.015519646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.105924554,0.0143483365,0.0012228474,0.7910556,0.049659126,0.00014664761,0.00009422144,0.00011570794,0.037433013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9321875,0.034860417,0.0029904635,0.004910123,0.019899346,0.005152148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8705839,0.09629673,0.0041701533,0.0038258957,0.01433292,0.010790395],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0685451,0.0006844149,0.0015386781,0.0049461056,0.023075169,0.03994932,0.00383953,0.058118057,0.018862838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12621818,0.0009498829,0.0017400915,0.004827822,0.030001834,0.044053264,0.010363832,0.03962701,0.003947448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030301157,0.000024758929,0.00023644305,0.00018279601,0.000013945451,0.00017140468,0.0050927033,0.000075260396,0.00014999467,0.47076815,0.51000965,0.013244569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020837399,0.000019478091,0.00056499365,0.0006093903,0.00001569301,0.000067349,0.0043498445,0.00009775719,0.000089216635,0.077048264,0.9170697,0.000047443278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008063646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009354476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9600507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01767527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025550686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3625055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555535336","doi":"","title":"Legally satisfied: a survey of law library workers and job satisfaction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Job satisfaction; Law; Business; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0801765996274241,"score_gpt":0.34865660673362975,"score_spread":0.2684800071062057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555535336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977082,0.00016746398,0.000027591628,0.00034858417,0.000006905739,0.000018119985,0.00029230036,0.0000035122134,0.0014272799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853265,0.00019873856,0.00005102768,0.00023571459,0.0000036385973,0.000008003148,0.00018599723,0.0000021924106,0.00078202976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887437,0.00014000869,0.00007486675,0.000063634274,0.00044090513,0.0004061115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593073,0.0003414468,0.00080146245,0.00008106555,0.0014977518,0.0013475433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011739134,0.000121788886,0.00026333923,0.0010868863,0.0026944447,0.0012192514,0.0006038901,0.0003609653,0.0020153853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00338693,0.00023150754,0.00019797796,0.001972529,0.0009304016,0.0005200838,0.0007971066,0.00058787904,0.00027752566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026530852,0.000045905206,0.98758334,0.000025725327,0.000010388006,0.00008109742,0.0063748383,0.000024194473,0.00012370468,0.000038532864,0.0012973616,0.0043684435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015345149,0.00004802179,0.97791684,0.000023787386,0.0000033216058,0.00003265679,0.020624116,0.000059262078,0.000023936005,0.000009235689,0.0012507166,0.000006617126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82974637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8756357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82974637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003847232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005710186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34251255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556191766","doi":"","title":"Legal Education, TWU, and the Looking Glass","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal education; Legal profession; Legal ethics; Legal practice; Point (geometry); Sociology; Curriculum; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01760411228603856,"score_gpt":0.36059954133209776,"score_spread":0.3429954290460592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556191766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22127289,0.0037436732,0.0035676998,0.37385368,0.0010778592,0.000052503285,0.00004098588,0.00010369708,0.39628696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94838333,0.0007008097,0.0010143842,0.024142873,0.00012914688,0.00003291187,0.000012353893,0.000045226516,0.025538903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968546,0.0015267167,0.00006471072,0.00023248533,0.0003789705,0.0009424433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407506,0.0018339052,0.00056220556,0.0003454107,0.0005411719,0.0026422432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004306933,0.00013908779,0.00023948835,0.0009962298,0.012733991,0.0073916037,0.0009207964,0.0032992032,0.01002887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008913111,0.0002539924,0.0002442752,0.0008090336,0.030634241,0.0054334872,0.0078222,0.00967282,0.000574153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012995965,0.000067067645,0.0033855801,0.000057399102,0.000002125121,0.00015879943,0.02810295,0.000057270277,0.00012487441,0.92334545,0.021898093,0.022787476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033498214,0.00014251351,0.017246349,0.0011157732,0.000012010578,0.00035970504,0.10523931,0.0007303218,0.0006546531,0.4133889,0.46101016,0.00006685005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025282875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05931912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025282875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009529239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011385069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06913972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556624405","doi":"","title":"\"Howdy, Neighbour!\" Introducing the Canadian Association of Law Libraries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011067735134338081,"score_gpt":0.22277719148776026,"score_spread":0.21170945635342217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556624405","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001440779,0.018667556,0.0013488992,0.74087095,0.022925526,0.00007943314,0.00021071515,0.00030730828,0.21414873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057954162,0.019062586,0.004251701,0.19882421,0.007656792,0.00011660987,0.00025930547,0.00030652003,0.7115682],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919247,0.0012981633,0.00021767976,0.0005993097,0.0039245505,0.0020354725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813805,0.0017086759,0.00035688153,0.00039430338,0.009769285,0.0063902773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075870794,0.00056597195,0.00038043957,0.003504023,0.028847085,0.020111252,0.0027960886,0.012071902,0.02810051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01516644,0.00067694613,0.0006069665,0.0042902995,0.013489619,0.008242944,0.0063780895,0.011147099,0.0043302868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042585707,0.0000069185944,0.0003276776,0.00003214248,0.0000016660173,0.00003693573,0.00087717676,0.000027698246,0.000028093596,0.04765822,0.9341655,0.016833847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017147124,0.0000016119235,0.00075241097,0.00006670303,0.0000017199402,0.000015074417,0.0013814187,0.00002287535,0.000013481085,0.0017664266,0.9959637,0.000012975567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94370544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9843053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06859091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06859091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22939071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4976642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558599784","doi":"","title":"Clinical Legal Education in Canada: A Survey of the Scholarship","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Scholarship; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Legal research; Politics; Economic Justice; Law; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.09259511542202659,"score_gpt":0.4317289448270501,"score_spread":0.3391338294050235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2558599784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76694983,0.069360994,0.0005782235,0.10001284,0.0005429875,0.00025400682,0.0021480538,0.00010931096,0.060043767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9410599,0.04291949,0.0007814649,0.007573175,0.000085583684,0.0000755462,0.0006981311,0.000039657196,0.006766977],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858742,0.0016843779,0.0010750605,0.000603362,0.007918986,0.0028441504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94094145,0.011889248,0.006442225,0.000598395,0.022447586,0.017681086],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007679573,0.00029999678,0.00073455006,0.010205528,0.014359445,0.008645334,0.002417273,0.0023097303,0.004776247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034331053,0.0004539962,0.00031837358,0.029317277,0.0050428086,0.002337995,0.0051021725,0.0021013862,0.00038620993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017261998,0.00032931738,0.321083,0.0024453322,0.000051290266,0.0017135923,0.20274697,0.0003435359,0.0005860408,0.025747688,0.061326705,0.38345394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022890916,0.00013202896,0.49430197,0.0022094112,0.000025646783,0.000827247,0.27827433,0.00053427485,0.00020531852,0.0012909475,0.2220831,0.00009286156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96815723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98342717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12047145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30663422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8740856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W255874791","doi":"","title":"The Globalization of the Student Lawyer: A Law Student Practice Rule for Indigent Criminal Defense in Sub-Saharan Africa","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Legal service; Political science; Legal research; Criminal law; Practice of law; Economic shortage; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.022870469647897195,"score_gpt":0.38033642120500155,"score_spread":0.35746595155710437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W255874791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8974094,0.0011734224,0.00056749064,0.06578448,0.0002126978,0.00007537739,0.000013826586,0.000015928621,0.034747332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98738796,0.00081720704,0.00047346318,0.0042424374,0.0000379861,0.000028705643,0.0000077973755,0.0000118288435,0.006992526],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767774,0.0009435508,0.000058929087,0.00013735412,0.00021780725,0.0009646745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961481,0.00062835705,0.0004667647,0.00011565021,0.00025561062,0.0023854633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002257261,0.0002117553,0.0003327451,0.00045459796,0.018142918,0.008311112,0.0014561081,0.0031744402,0.008579002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005283544,0.0002888922,0.00022758954,0.0006267683,0.0071743713,0.0040411856,0.011005389,0.005004257,0.00046735408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102617174,0.0007849435,0.072125226,0.00034356027,0.000021577796,0.018863318,0.6592727,0.00026968183,0.0024093108,0.12105888,0.023701277,0.101046935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028818366,0.00028806014,0.029405473,0.00037608808,0.000015045487,0.0026569278,0.83536136,0.0002986028,0.0004996437,0.007431993,0.1236027,0.000035325575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018143445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07171622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018143445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00471808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014579475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03607565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559051650","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n10p103","title":"Criminological and Legal Investigation of Independence and Despotism of the Judge in Judgment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Independence (probability theory); Dignity; Impartiality; Economic Justice; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06784793807775356,"score_gpt":0.3486434338637803,"score_spread":0.28079549578602675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559051650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15105894,0.0073960703,0.005483341,0.031067513,0.00064682594,0.0001611041,0.00010092526,0.000012470447,0.80407274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789661,0.0013505162,0.000898803,0.0034424835,0.00029333303,0.000052684132,0.000018479499,0.0000068748222,0.014970667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99299276,0.0030158772,0.0002964206,0.00062589906,0.0022298028,0.0008392902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820685,0.010811863,0.0020984055,0.0007640315,0.0034154614,0.0008418067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005036527,0.00019909274,0.00025981682,0.0033490083,0.0088453265,0.0073341075,0.0008894865,0.0034577353,0.0036223326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01895147,0.0002486425,0.00026167586,0.0025137304,0.03413354,0.0049508647,0.0028107185,0.0057044793,0.00028967825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002082922,0.000037926155,0.004577749,0.00007045871,0.0000069925554,0.00080323,0.01751825,0.00007326252,0.00025262494,0.96289486,0.005457915,0.0082859285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002882472,0.00014528376,0.042257987,0.0010526258,0.000054247324,0.003083162,0.084494,0.0013091373,0.0020887528,0.6011612,0.2642163,0.000108476386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011166674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02062751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011166674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057456987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00571782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041688144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559193241","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v23i4.525","title":"Clinical legal education and disability: accommodation, implementation and assessment in service-learning programs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Experiential learning; Context (archaeology); Experiential education; Relevance (law); Legal education; Accommodation; Service (business); Service-learning; Reasonable accommodation; Pedagogy; Learning disability; Psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Business; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.10256429671831059,"score_gpt":0.5863512038637245,"score_spread":0.48378690714541395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559193241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98006976,0.00030256,0.00233222,0.0031169322,0.000038823302,0.0014710278,0.000044184886,0.00006594626,0.012558602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940493,0.00016370602,0.004123795,0.00013609696,0.000011577523,0.0006187606,0.00003898191,0.0000054162765,0.0008523572],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96431476,0.026833525,0.0012795833,0.00077104487,0.0036514616,0.0031496244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651545,0.013744742,0.0035617216,0.002253052,0.0057383776,0.009547445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0351517,0.00021956448,0.00042993083,0.0021366775,0.0031358658,0.004056857,0.0020083694,0.0012767749,0.003417916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072785094,0.00027905844,0.00033363226,0.0020047848,0.0019092351,0.0042392295,0.010060335,0.0016379802,0.000397371],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000613042,0.015865216,0.15336747,0.0004926302,0.00002537881,0.00032828923,0.06563879,0.0010184897,0.0006508709,0.008312874,0.0019940797,0.75169283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007273821,0.023442157,0.6201755,0.0033580747,0.00012686953,0.0010930994,0.2783415,0.013007354,0.006382517,0.013329531,0.03975827,0.00025775368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007967179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015284083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0351517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00714239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021611858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18590218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560156547","doi":"","title":"POSITIVISM AND THE INSEPARABILITY OF LAW AND MORALS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Law; Principle of legality; Philosophy of law; Jurisprudence; Legal positivism; Positivism; Political science; Philosophy; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0272791613285259,"score_gpt":0.34140305120460795,"score_spread":0.31412388987608203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560156547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09767434,0.013820218,0.07914781,0.1511193,0.00069475715,0.000053839463,0.00009763341,0.000119506636,0.6572726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98550296,0.0018554932,0.00465156,0.0022962124,0.0002564888,0.000055938883,0.000021017293,0.00002679251,0.0053335484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921691,0.0055877944,0.00017034277,0.00047811551,0.0010619774,0.0005327369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893294,0.0077063516,0.0007981575,0.00096728967,0.00064695906,0.00055176194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008377648,0.00037440102,0.000455809,0.0023738174,0.0046349596,0.00848126,0.00082958525,0.0026126204,0.0032347208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074997153,0.00046951414,0.00056395854,0.0011014421,0.073711894,0.009151108,0.0053550103,0.005541142,0.00037070346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024592707,0.0000036679319,0.000057321035,0.000005816058,0.000001147607,0.000005881025,0.00054090057,0.00006409081,0.000013986315,0.9984353,0.0002269756,0.00064246554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065401186,0.0000031698655,0.00008281401,0.000014732988,0.0000010654968,0.000009044414,0.00017890162,0.00014963579,0.000031290016,0.9952773,0.0042431434,0.0000023026432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003307914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026046925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00848126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00789545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004634456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057285786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560669826","doi":"","title":"Words and Apples: The Ladder Approach in Judicial Decision Making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Common law; Process (computing); Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.021471155324649462,"score_gpt":0.35188372269717016,"score_spread":0.3304125673725207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560669826","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018144732,0.0050167316,0.5600571,0.034578007,0.0006818344,0.00023065247,0.0001536166,0.00036050245,0.38077676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7623093,0.0034292955,0.19118105,0.0054249302,0.0006303137,0.00063571974,0.00010444412,0.00031897906,0.035966013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97546244,0.016317375,0.0009471484,0.0020301044,0.0038098674,0.0014332099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97821474,0.015613603,0.001304892,0.0022033195,0.0016494137,0.0010140532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019659102,0.0007953137,0.0009065156,0.004810787,0.0053730346,0.018985938,0.0025964552,0.0076345224,0.014296278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04148193,0.0010702641,0.0014202312,0.0052190833,0.040981274,0.033693034,0.007826268,0.0075711906,0.0022778593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013425738,0.000005486484,0.00007815269,0.000016865395,0.000004633771,0.000026358666,0.0010153516,0.0004538178,0.000041722316,0.991608,0.0009993664,0.005736775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012331554,0.0000060967363,0.000047470363,0.000038903832,0.0000031654347,0.000010020741,0.000306686,0.0008585949,0.000036477304,0.9921672,0.006505872,0.00000707107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009045394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012872875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019659102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078015323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008918301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1039685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562583985","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n1p234","title":"Ways to Defend Citizenship Rights in Civil Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran and Republic of Tajikistan","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Law; Constitution; Citizenship; Reservation of rights; Political science; Safeguarding; Human rights; Right to property; International human rights law; Private rights; Social rights; Rule of law; Government (linguistics); Politics","score_opus":0.04902071602274823,"score_gpt":0.33470166159549636,"score_spread":0.28568094557274815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562583985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1283498,0.01602605,0.039534677,0.13021956,0.0021425986,0.0008357283,0.00008993756,0.00040428096,0.6823974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9318326,0.0029230418,0.026177322,0.013939807,0.00063166616,0.0004043953,0.000076072516,0.000055350476,0.023959748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939892,0.0029245194,0.00034183968,0.00044889457,0.0014062474,0.00088925095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567974,0.0021861615,0.00045633837,0.00055561325,0.00081000227,0.00031206178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013053253,0.0005449373,0.00040451757,0.0022844546,0.006700409,0.0079912525,0.0015564952,0.005391086,0.0033165528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010265913,0.0004496728,0.000729317,0.0011724812,0.021628961,0.0061681643,0.0057175434,0.008370731,0.00048163158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000965171,0.000050575683,0.0005118848,0.000048780214,0.000009521777,0.00016957827,0.010049792,0.00017675324,0.0003495453,0.96636903,0.00489361,0.01736128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104869956,0.00010192028,0.003770882,0.00083003833,0.000073626514,0.00035680478,0.015103399,0.0010993364,0.001171391,0.62133527,0.35597578,0.0000766032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011723709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0151168285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013053253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00526241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014315765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06903303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563619739","doi":"","title":"Back to the Future: Designing and Improving a System of Proactive Management-Based Regulation to Help Lawyers and Protect the Public","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Liability; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02909842288877689,"score_gpt":0.29794196948505375,"score_spread":0.26884354659627685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563619739","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108816214,0.0042435494,0.46512014,0.25962293,0.0036940533,0.0051745554,0.00028148032,0.008470349,0.14457671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38462165,0.002221383,0.54084086,0.041751858,0.00053847383,0.002349713,0.00053886016,0.00065298757,0.026484234],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9523357,0.02795753,0.0019875832,0.0045731836,0.009786639,0.003359385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94564044,0.0112965405,0.0058845636,0.008944301,0.019741293,0.008492759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057822723,0.0006747401,0.00051748153,0.0020414947,0.0060995826,0.012895175,0.0049120765,0.00491168,0.00681086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051305942,0.00085868535,0.0012271806,0.0012928668,0.0059745614,0.017452637,0.0073494054,0.0070155216,0.0036473414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030366855,0.004662165,0.039930586,0.0016332505,0.0002707814,0.00060176227,0.033755783,0.0070678587,0.018386694,0.13038826,0.10895741,0.6540418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004053738,0.0026190642,0.025362251,0.003448429,0.00037467427,0.0007831499,0.022628617,0.019574076,0.016624035,0.06620087,0.841502,0.00047745806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007776149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008348042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057822723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009144767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035270113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30579942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564886668","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n1p177","title":"Pathological Analysis of the Charter of Citizenship Rights in Iran in Judicial Rights Terms with a Focus on Human Dignity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Charter; Political science; Law; Citizenship; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; International human rights law; Right to property; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06187675651863107,"score_gpt":0.36893683618415735,"score_spread":0.3070600796655263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564886668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24355254,0.0014985751,0.019698277,0.011891488,0.0006432433,0.00036836675,0.0003196329,0.000120812976,0.721907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.956166,0.0006401325,0.010044336,0.0005098697,0.00013394613,0.0001085507,0.00017338846,0.000026342677,0.03219731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712026,0.00090647145,0.00013007651,0.00029931508,0.0011416811,0.00040227303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762756,0.00081515225,0.0004041329,0.00016061835,0.0008903461,0.00010216478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027537774,0.00019836835,0.00018505045,0.0026845261,0.003417299,0.0043920907,0.0006473773,0.0007420997,0.0048901485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005783127,0.0001156987,0.00024277157,0.003299537,0.0060513807,0.0020446728,0.00091758184,0.0019047852,0.0005001506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000113908645,0.000013247677,0.0017505231,0.000032960244,0.0000015530057,0.0001873136,0.0074765664,0.0002898189,0.0002794576,0.96483165,0.006021583,0.01910392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031851556,0.000105554995,0.05412089,0.0003753852,0.000032673852,0.000923684,0.037900425,0.0073336484,0.0019209277,0.3297248,0.56743926,0.00009100971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024438573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017098758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024438573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071945647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00759108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052200437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564938851","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v23i5.564","title":"Clinical Legal Education in a Dangerous Time","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Legal education; Situated; Relation (database); Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06872745663137748,"score_gpt":0.5508931711349128,"score_spread":0.4821657145035353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564938851","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063323653,0.0054985518,0.0016358554,0.92955124,0.012420708,0.000024737146,0.000017522672,0.00008392686,0.044435132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3953647,0.0099024065,0.0072466554,0.49799368,0.013329363,0.0001617508,0.0001022451,0.0002933933,0.07560591],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.972624,0.015502155,0.0006820765,0.0012625321,0.0053915265,0.0045376727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92515683,0.0127717415,0.003166976,0.0014647585,0.004021379,0.053418223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018512264,0.00054197235,0.00068402855,0.0012949526,0.018389769,0.016228637,0.0018060156,0.013653927,0.031000873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049954835,0.000444241,0.0007424258,0.0008207822,0.017345177,0.01790576,0.019526947,0.032781795,0.004569982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109335095,0.0004170545,0.0025487212,0.0003058452,0.000023077548,0.0038629049,0.028658627,0.0003814154,0.00046640987,0.35733804,0.5285548,0.07733379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037135113,0.000116685515,0.0009766516,0.0011542764,0.000005528471,0.001507596,0.029354533,0.00017515935,0.00020737997,0.13659738,0.82981557,0.000052105417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032045709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008467281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031000873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009805408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036929835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10370827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570762802","doi":"10.5430/wje.v6n6p89","title":"Evaluating the Potential of Virtual Simulations to Facilitate Professional Learning in Law: A Literature Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"World Journal of Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Apprehension; Professional development; Legal education; Educational technology; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering; Political science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.16677927549100788,"score_gpt":0.5333604198832608,"score_spread":0.36658114439225287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570762802","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025022472,0.99889416,0.00008334697,0.0001600954,0.000046421792,0.000009662274,0.0000098924265,0.0000021094456,0.000544193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020976216,0.99757594,0.00016031087,0.000060145197,0.00002989803,0.0000088955785,0.000010570814,0.0000011314324,0.00005545497],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818844,0.0006526232,0.0003288966,0.00018331499,0.00058205286,0.00006474814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98053885,0.01662805,0.0010081292,0.00014819013,0.0014807605,0.00019593378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004195174,0.0010793812,0.002437201,0.0070617455,0.0004921584,0.0022717803,0.0015513189,0.0020601714,0.004438921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013539095,0.0006470664,0.0012466154,0.008402614,0.00094203604,0.0026693842,0.001159196,0.0011322217,0.00059593],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009391555,0.00010153666,0.00059047283,0.1605147,0.0003847663,0.00011377358,0.00040977696,0.00042871336,0.00031115345,0.0030989666,0.005015815,0.82893634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006825886,0.0005356523,0.009050815,0.4245149,0.003740012,0.0016652158,0.0024301107,0.0006072173,0.0014653313,0.0050420533,0.5507598,0.000120676625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004069902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070617455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012941473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053717685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022186458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571526283","doi":"","title":"(Introductory Remarks) \"The Delicate Topic of Gender in Legal Education : The Canadian Experience\"","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nagoya Daigaku hosei ronshu/Hōsei ronshū","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Sociology; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.08298221054224078,"score_gpt":0.38732616892081806,"score_spread":0.3043439583785773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571526283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009683773,0.0069742985,0.0006176676,0.84643203,0.030855881,0.0001322005,0.0011114371,0.00012057203,0.104072176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08313506,0.006118675,0.0012904557,0.476257,0.010600128,0.0002386921,0.00041656438,0.00035735554,0.42158604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960012,0.0006302086,0.00016504758,0.0005051174,0.0012893458,0.0014091489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916938,0.00275605,0.0003677459,0.000116714975,0.00323627,0.001829427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040723397,0.00075925625,0.0006818352,0.0013777143,0.024099847,0.009725504,0.0032149772,0.010661938,0.033832554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012047819,0.00046692637,0.0008163922,0.003629323,0.0084233545,0.004896218,0.0033732958,0.017900605,0.003724342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022503607,0.00002031671,0.0011486612,0.0001523531,0.0000044401363,0.0003202342,0.04065644,0.000048952363,0.00024089798,0.040234417,0.9107091,0.006441796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070562164,0.0000073646097,0.004432836,0.00016360596,0.000006950279,0.00009407068,0.045084957,0.000030181538,0.00011631565,0.0010513748,0.94896257,0.000042712756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9696362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98589766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0428297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0428297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07219029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3107527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571536122","doi":"","title":"Judicial Education: Pedagogy for a Change","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of dispute resolution","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.2448423368850208,"score_gpt":0.515945808805086,"score_spread":0.27110347192006523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571536122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026757792,0.009886013,0.0049003186,0.9015783,0.0035416193,0.000083371764,0.000035531062,0.00015327163,0.07714582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4338731,0.031639215,0.0458304,0.38506868,0.006053414,0.00054490473,0.00016060079,0.0003261314,0.096503526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98384154,0.006824457,0.00045765462,0.001284785,0.004554469,0.0030370571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97692215,0.005806136,0.00090397574,0.0012858714,0.005800419,0.009281449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024719993,0.0007543859,0.0007412134,0.002873092,0.014356962,0.017080626,0.0031559183,0.009749598,0.020116905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02685343,0.0005153843,0.00090346363,0.00189337,0.030276924,0.017895013,0.01210124,0.017265206,0.0033136022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030483823,0.0004141469,0.0012826754,0.00045850297,0.000016536475,0.00021531656,0.017015789,0.00022078629,0.000312939,0.6108583,0.20894304,0.16023152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004538206,0.00006190405,0.0016085795,0.0014810316,0.000013730942,0.0001298189,0.02620904,0.0002642198,0.00020154202,0.1590911,0.8108551,0.000038535647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17941347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26575154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17941347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044718195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13246699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35673833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572041551","doi":"","title":"\"The Delicate Topic of Gender in Legal Education : The Canadian Experience\"","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nagoya Daigaku hosei ronshu/Hōsei ronshū","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal education; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.11709307503651525,"score_gpt":0.41642587056474634,"score_spread":0.2993327955282311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572041551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26444992,0.020444816,0.0008965963,0.4775219,0.004258239,0.000121231446,0.00039911302,0.00006202151,0.23184602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80182934,0.017852535,0.0008876786,0.048175637,0.0005738112,0.000073819865,0.000120884535,0.00016552229,0.13032077],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99236417,0.0017212202,0.00015548112,0.00055087317,0.0019004626,0.0033078135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98841906,0.0031370947,0.000479136,0.00015894407,0.0020991964,0.005706548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006533051,0.0006701477,0.0009185878,0.0022842523,0.08454514,0.012576567,0.00301774,0.0102944495,0.014434131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013804879,0.00055180927,0.00072105485,0.006362401,0.025492769,0.0064864163,0.007350783,0.013914184,0.0006339345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008410668,0.00012579204,0.007821638,0.0002363879,0.0000144661735,0.002192634,0.67802674,0.00014185824,0.0004962027,0.1326686,0.13223256,0.045959007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013835765,0.000023579802,0.00839766,0.00032987952,0.000016681623,0.00055866875,0.4990507,0.00009666556,0.00018279458,0.0023304732,0.48892257,0.00007652405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.873618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12638201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.324352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91696995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573199049","doi":"10.1177/2322005816669606","title":"Teaching Law for the Real World:","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Legal education; General partnership; Law; Legal profession; Commercial law; Political science; Legal research; Comparative law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0527156518936335,"score_gpt":0.4620410660962867,"score_spread":0.4093254142026532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573199049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016065223,0.020788733,0.03948076,0.52042097,0.010918487,0.00015032417,0.00006660424,0.0005942353,0.39151472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57226163,0.038913626,0.040632248,0.16485484,0.0071156644,0.00060217327,0.0002308835,0.0009859398,0.17440304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807149,0.0121010905,0.00040788008,0.0014652888,0.003531201,0.0017795891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98719203,0.005681138,0.00081177976,0.0012855772,0.0012946461,0.003734835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014957473,0.0006434354,0.0007921213,0.0016745572,0.016035639,0.02529198,0.0037871986,0.009038913,0.024920199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020189568,0.0005966292,0.00084308727,0.0012117797,0.035644162,0.039288707,0.018269109,0.0169691,0.006317252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014660679,0.0003098124,0.0017087347,0.00044561469,0.000016221811,0.00075381406,0.104396746,0.0003721395,0.0005678865,0.62067497,0.16256317,0.10817628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014210992,0.00005756731,0.0004965688,0.00058549555,0.0000070458286,0.00073900697,0.06009669,0.0002937895,0.00023487763,0.16222663,0.77521837,0.000029699399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005223693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0112426365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02529198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011057218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01753614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083366334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574851620","doi":"","title":"Defending Rights in RussiaPamela A. JORDAN. , Vancouver : UBC Press, 2005, 304 p.","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers du monde russe","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; State (computer science); Political science; Art; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.017904014837313673,"score_gpt":0.29799217141126977,"score_spread":0.2800881565739561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574851620","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029229682,0.84401953,0.00033483258,0.027874293,0.0013101483,0.000015810978,0.00052344316,0.00006870564,0.12293026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041819017,0.54355276,0.0008876694,0.0034292457,0.001026502,0.00004802589,0.00064896164,0.00009448669,0.4084935],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966824,0.00008501648,0.000032730233,0.00004053935,0.000119416036,0.00005398259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997402,0.000066607325,0.000051508996,0.000011899428,0.00006961043,0.00006024246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066458917,0.0008237224,0.0004751889,0.002054426,0.0035560976,0.004588368,0.00077646354,0.0019591649,0.029941045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070616667,0.0006065273,0.0002176963,0.0047782892,0.001807622,0.0027673363,0.0010828514,0.0018515246,0.008253604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032174907,0.00005709634,0.0012190506,0.0006154502,0.00001406795,0.00024398386,0.00598483,0.00019276762,0.00031211667,0.042714808,0.75738114,0.19123255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004878575,0.0000066646867,0.003754341,0.0005561761,0.000003829855,0.00010784228,0.0025198413,0.00002535065,0.00009958687,0.002957667,0.9899574,0.0000063916464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15264459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40409335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15264459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005664365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008866694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30351216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576862296","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12267","title":"A Survey of Beliefs and Priorities About Access to Justice of Family Law: The Search for A Multidisciplinary Perspective*","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Mental health; Family law; Law; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Political science; Popularity; Psychology; Public relations; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.28785571453105835,"score_gpt":0.5381772428008942,"score_spread":0.25032152826983584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576862296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972083,0.0007448464,0.00011719923,0.000691072,0.000011159124,0.000043669035,0.00012191929,0.0000014200378,0.0010604393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973744,0.0012599679,0.00032383937,0.00044405847,0.000011373953,0.00010164774,0.00015745658,0.0000015259496,0.00032560452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974253,0.0016015618,0.00028497577,0.00011467763,0.00034626774,0.00022722766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98991746,0.004558792,0.0028926944,0.00020068177,0.0015258308,0.0009044832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008001446,0.0001337373,0.00031749395,0.0016529623,0.0008423441,0.0012600176,0.00035246767,0.0006028354,0.0012296189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015703443,0.00026001383,0.00022189549,0.0020720954,0.000736237,0.002008812,0.0014038193,0.00094918953,0.00017674244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046639438,0.00015898148,0.88940185,0.00028494693,0.00003103013,0.0002647402,0.0798262,0.000033085245,0.00023848817,0.00067919516,0.0022189573,0.026815832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010720821,0.00031990086,0.72047657,0.00044165415,0.000017510949,0.00041844192,0.26851815,0.00020939154,0.000076051554,0.00025919682,0.009235216,0.000017228225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007617543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009467791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008001446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009253051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001825233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0423162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580118704","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1305","title":"Book Notes: How Lawyers Lose Their Way:A Profession Fails Its Creative Minds, by Jean Stefancic and Richard Delgado","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.025642432128446586,"score_gpt":0.31954857770121825,"score_spread":0.29390614557277167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580118704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051201583,0.02562958,0.00070797233,0.90458703,0.010608344,0.000019058305,0.0000969899,0.000051923715,0.057787098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014674152,0.035563562,0.0017752127,0.46209767,0.0141261965,0.00011085956,0.00014629542,0.00033085412,0.47117525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974025,0.00091258023,0.000080272024,0.00025685385,0.0011151127,0.00023260288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98876303,0.0077089835,0.0002738304,0.0002714187,0.0022348298,0.000747988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003232744,0.0008526557,0.00054443866,0.0017485173,0.011430737,0.012632631,0.0019983668,0.013712341,0.020821953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014383025,0.00083630066,0.00042281023,0.0022870242,0.012494693,0.016095571,0.00320028,0.016186045,0.007593735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013795793,0.000005835084,0.00004152528,0.000016348222,7.6433076e-7,0.000012649601,0.0007308419,0.0000146756265,0.000010383676,0.010259098,0.9849384,0.0039681373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000546879,0.0000053208623,0.00031704674,0.00022487341,0.000003179311,0.00007550022,0.0041221958,0.000052633608,0.00006463588,0.014427621,0.9806882,0.000013370932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085119896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27012354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085119896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060102292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012250324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16924888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581970992","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3030","title":"Book Review: Unlocking Memories: Cognitive Interviewing for Lawyers by Geoff Coughlin","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive interview; Interview; Criminology; Cognition; Sociology; Psychology; Anthropology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.0485227006500057,"score_gpt":0.39683206006334265,"score_spread":0.34830935941333696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581970992","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040807915,0.27686486,0.0020046001,0.6747836,0.026949426,0.00016146294,0.000117584816,0.00010893003,0.01492881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.066189095,0.47620866,0.0068418174,0.28546503,0.06103872,0.00091928046,0.00030612756,0.00045152594,0.102579765],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996318,0.002173214,0.00016201781,0.00022819734,0.0009537438,0.0001649111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609203,0.032783896,0.00079061865,0.00035286765,0.0040342435,0.0011180846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055274083,0.00047425355,0.0007760892,0.001906152,0.0023572429,0.0033906372,0.0013320125,0.004022874,0.006028351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029755075,0.00037328072,0.00023922157,0.0013666423,0.0030107298,0.0042179506,0.0016269116,0.006011326,0.0020286746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012229962,0.000015021148,0.00019957042,0.0004073938,0.0000065036643,0.00009680996,0.0029838115,0.000020886167,0.000107576016,0.0011187831,0.93542594,0.05960538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001400819,0.000047873455,0.0011516595,0.001918447,0.000021298063,0.00070039823,0.00998104,0.00011247286,0.00026434264,0.0043371357,0.98141676,0.0000345668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007925057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038035884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007925057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023952592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057643885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029232085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585534320","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001450","title":"'In the Public Interest': The Responsibilities and Rights of Government Lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Professional responsibility; Legal ethics; Law; Private rights; Economic Justice; Professional ethics; Democracy; Public interest; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05216139345106101,"score_gpt":0.38516743859201297,"score_spread":0.33300604514095195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585534320","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13644795,0.0048877895,0.019246692,0.38052997,0.0006680619,0.00006177269,0.000034412216,0.00009787145,0.45802546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759556,0.00053330476,0.0011982439,0.00865221,0.00019572633,0.000037263515,0.0000080790605,0.000025231386,0.013394316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9677477,0.02139624,0.00061626395,0.0016166162,0.00411819,0.004505043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972627,0.017373296,0.0021646759,0.0028582716,0.0024045268,0.0025722913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022351362,0.00026191748,0.00043351576,0.0009222118,0.011207754,0.015056355,0.00154868,0.011191226,0.0048218444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04237764,0.00048065605,0.0003440864,0.0008408758,0.047450546,0.012006586,0.007938817,0.011290309,0.00094920985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013518019,0.000041131123,0.0009024794,0.000020241036,0.0000039574034,0.00014570683,0.046839777,0.00007999906,0.00020651016,0.93393004,0.0062899687,0.011526727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047063717,0.000051859188,0.0024705515,0.00028530252,0.000016704013,0.00051978073,0.047014963,0.0005734117,0.0005813562,0.79684025,0.15155607,0.0000426713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006732023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052682613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022351362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005500127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014475655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11820674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587036166","doi":"","title":"Foreign Trained Black Lawyers’ Experiences in Ontario: I am a Lawyer! Am I a Lawyer? An Odyssey!","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; University of Toronto; Iowa State University; National University of Science and Technology; U.S. Department of Commerce","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.05510115537479684,"score_gpt":0.35009009748971365,"score_spread":0.29498894211491683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587036166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753201,0.0005021764,0.00015116109,0.009982924,0.0001269047,0.000035836656,0.00009814529,0.000013450682,0.013769427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852138,0.0006134024,0.00012155488,0.0017966302,0.000019233032,0.000024841162,0.000047831745,0.000017633276,0.0121450145],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971367,0.00069915026,0.000056605015,0.0002055602,0.0006518031,0.0012502505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938472,0.0008320561,0.00064490497,0.00008979062,0.0010009271,0.003585244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002308513,0.00031806718,0.00056169846,0.00087868643,0.03273419,0.0060666353,0.0016340486,0.0016569921,0.008601817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005214354,0.00048100256,0.00022344854,0.0016631276,0.011662169,0.002144341,0.0055530975,0.0035701173,0.0005077469],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031809424,0.00003849679,0.0090608075,0.00004245792,0.0000043712716,0.0006517199,0.9792596,0.000024990637,0.0004099582,0.00092039903,0.005319731,0.004235582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019376394,0.00001514295,0.0076266397,0.00005929185,0.000002432343,0.000058888483,0.9751497,0.000022968086,0.00003863382,0.000058132293,0.016955087,0.000011202423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9253044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98191327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07469559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051198445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058214024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37147248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587226071","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1381","title":"Power Point in Legal Education: Pedagogical Paradox-An Exploratory Study","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Point (geometry); Exploratory research; Power point; Legal education; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Mathematics education; Mathematics; Social science; Physics","score_opus":0.10601633648221641,"score_gpt":0.43717876468040096,"score_spread":0.33116242819818453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587226071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9735174,0.00024671017,0.002964376,0.0033797687,0.000031975167,0.00015448508,0.000022963255,0.000012556106,0.019669734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976624,0.00012110504,0.0006299018,0.0001904285,0.000009180378,0.00006189081,0.000006742397,0.000007635708,0.0013107858],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891979,0.007665551,0.00018791699,0.0007277426,0.0016111499,0.0006096456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9333845,0.058284,0.0021185128,0.001848694,0.0017615147,0.0026027975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01437424,0.00022912583,0.0006975683,0.0025053713,0.007642166,0.007581789,0.0023562484,0.0025088477,0.0062660086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048097283,0.00046169164,0.00023376866,0.0022999821,0.011857741,0.0121824145,0.0070684627,0.0057172454,0.0005379731],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017219389,0.0029850588,0.026257517,0.00022115596,0.000012255483,0.0014287238,0.82508767,0.00024069981,0.0008788498,0.09564087,0.0016168677,0.04545814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068791174,0.0004412688,0.012687967,0.00019605232,0.00001637378,0.0007292214,0.9318728,0.001453646,0.00086746376,0.038598124,0.013044529,0.0000237614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016842594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002761575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01437424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029044915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003942524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07601917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587242656","doi":"","title":"A Legal Analysis of the Access to Court Record Policies of the Provincial and Territorial Courts of the Common Law Jurisdiction of Canada and Public Accessibility","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Public access; Original jurisdiction; Common law; Public administration","score_opus":0.01908961824210296,"score_gpt":0.3238294537769467,"score_spread":0.30473983553484374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587242656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43777233,0.0030486337,0.0037486854,0.042726517,0.000106692685,0.0002508145,0.0019189223,0.00006185891,0.5103656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98304594,0.00083794934,0.0008964773,0.0012552572,0.000026008078,0.000036512858,0.00018555197,0.000012190776,0.0137041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871451,0.0011979361,0.0003093175,0.00060790055,0.00594346,0.0047962205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733138,0.009152897,0.0023336504,0.0010633465,0.011670356,0.0024659545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004338547,0.00017313969,0.00040047173,0.0042282334,0.011740062,0.010650648,0.0019352536,0.0017340471,0.0057897163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028317722,0.00029266797,0.0004885219,0.008217202,0.011434746,0.0027176838,0.0027844473,0.0028493716,0.0002124461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034352386,0.000036305988,0.020717977,0.00007703237,0.000025701993,0.00027121085,0.017056162,0.0010466336,0.00024094332,0.93849623,0.009128765,0.012868615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007141766,0.000108367865,0.43880478,0.0013549827,0.00046164295,0.00039035114,0.11478056,0.008195188,0.001475283,0.14840306,0.28570527,0.00024917358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99030966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86941373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13058624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24667808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9474739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587939824","doi":"","title":"Library & Learning Commons: Law & Legislation: Citing Legal Sources","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Commons; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08239854981434418,"score_gpt":0.3335069427738028,"score_spread":0.2511083929594586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587939824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034679098,0.013142502,0.0023388902,0.104367554,0.006455108,0.00024691533,0.012995235,0.0029445202,0.8540412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037711162,0.03077823,0.0034451922,0.01866301,0.0039599272,0.0001563458,0.006333283,0.0012429145,0.8977099],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972282,0.00011097776,0.00014514549,0.000088803965,0.0021355893,0.0002912881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98686177,0.0022145554,0.00060242735,0.0008896403,0.0072028954,0.0022287327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019054916,0.00048712548,0.0009582375,0.008745219,0.011985241,0.01645648,0.0017515753,0.004280265,0.19142878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018798428,0.000493857,0.00031463557,0.017549215,0.00424389,0.0064368946,0.0032617794,0.002086233,0.075683184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007585442,0.000015771666,0.0003285466,0.00019851164,0.00000293061,0.00008744501,0.00046582957,0.000042196378,0.00016446618,0.007979372,0.9368751,0.05383224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026619355,0.0000035639116,0.001681877,0.000301992,0.000008087771,0.00004342019,0.0009868635,0.00008623894,0.00021095473,0.0031120072,0.9935429,0.000019492725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7952082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9103445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7952082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022130918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08316887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6403931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589511104","doi":"10.7202/1038487ar","title":"An Inside Job: Engaging with Indigenous Legal Traditions through Stories","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Law; Narrative; Legal education; Political science; Sociology; Traditional knowledge","score_opus":0.06392293215609136,"score_gpt":0.36531756448323294,"score_spread":0.3013946323271416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589511104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6463505,0.0044748634,0.05001454,0.04947301,0.0014129867,0.0005185583,0.00019003564,0.00042551535,0.24713996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589135,0.0018338702,0.013747096,0.0029222022,0.00020979537,0.00022245872,0.000068829504,0.00018904006,0.021893313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760611,0.019412424,0.00031180913,0.0007127206,0.0019949742,0.0015068897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97527766,0.017549757,0.0014231111,0.001500557,0.0010532334,0.0031956395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014704325,0.0011177976,0.00059188914,0.0020354271,0.01661893,0.012808238,0.003008013,0.0043543866,0.0062516103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023578603,0.0006189941,0.0007086401,0.0011930288,0.0292651,0.016913723,0.01782336,0.00539866,0.0014093067],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008617422,0.000034089007,0.0006088273,0.000067941,0.000004455873,0.0005541924,0.982088,0.000040677827,0.00029764604,0.00823959,0.0019562317,0.006099664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005944534,0.00004006555,0.00046860642,0.00027588083,0.000011562894,0.000756709,0.90909857,0.000209754,0.0006085752,0.006637153,0.08186177,0.00002532884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060713585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013208657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01661893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042526824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005085035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07776487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589630749","doi":"","title":"UofL Libraries: Foreign Law: Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03449367265831965,"score_gpt":0.3183735161631886,"score_spread":0.28387984350486895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589630749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023048392,0.061437014,0.0011884101,0.07560757,0.0054290225,0.0001533459,0.0102143185,0.00089374534,0.8427718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01813893,0.029729463,0.0010518117,0.0062698913,0.0009767067,0.000042973727,0.0021049427,0.0003301076,0.94135517],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977896,0.000108301676,0.00008490172,0.00017333649,0.0013145097,0.0005293676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496126,0.00043849237,0.0001287347,0.00013892802,0.0032427928,0.001089827],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014757703,0.0007681802,0.0006441385,0.0068765967,0.014596455,0.013517225,0.0017788013,0.0037267953,0.18277147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038970804,0.00066059857,0.0004564636,0.01770378,0.0041538724,0.004877933,0.0024333007,0.0029386212,0.027446104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008123402,0.000015716614,0.0004630253,0.0001425883,0.00000214807,0.00006350392,0.0005289948,0.000086489126,0.000060968705,0.030787991,0.92419535,0.04364493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013556064,0.0000014836745,0.0011132422,0.00013214273,0.0000014112311,0.000020599105,0.000578562,0.000023441718,0.000034393437,0.00089678814,0.99718624,0.000010277305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9845449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81722856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09418183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15910299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6833402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589870051","doi":"","title":"An Exploration of Virtual Visitation as an Option in Divorce Proceedings","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Internet privacy; Business; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.08162013078902654,"score_gpt":0.35613938839230247,"score_spread":0.27451925760327595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589870051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30107495,0.012228126,0.009010098,0.040265217,0.0006129586,0.00014057744,0.00016443727,0.000078246936,0.6364254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97209567,0.0051963,0.0026947022,0.0029412552,0.00020526751,0.00009142605,0.00008466938,0.000063239175,0.01662759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99002576,0.0073015294,0.0001623819,0.00032766996,0.0011659818,0.0010165705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99294245,0.004909796,0.00045262792,0.00025937907,0.00040701273,0.0010287287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049078246,0.00028265428,0.00034592152,0.0021761793,0.015779953,0.016290974,0.0025885948,0.0034286738,0.013011449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011147214,0.0003875583,0.0007299143,0.0028874837,0.017724955,0.013611979,0.013580196,0.005043095,0.0006938256],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041175892,0.00012797644,0.0039774315,0.00019160105,0.000011583045,0.0025666466,0.26841474,0.0003111211,0.00012308804,0.66964346,0.014752823,0.039838415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002249312,0.00007200221,0.0052760933,0.0008980574,0.000018467765,0.0022986375,0.55206865,0.00090719265,0.00014557932,0.0696221,0.3686214,0.000049359558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020332031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05178854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020332031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010281001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067435075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0745942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590531985","doi":"","title":"Juries in the 21st Century, by Jacqueline Horan","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.014170204178206138,"score_gpt":0.3002366324507993,"score_spread":0.28606642827259315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590531985","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027110946,0.08155195,0.00015351186,0.8855877,0.022658201,0.0000048412317,0.00003028732,0.000012018236,0.009730377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029272417,0.15631568,0.0009814249,0.56828004,0.09674353,0.0000850953,0.000075856726,0.0001397356,0.14810616],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957515,0.0012901074,0.00029707578,0.0006742102,0.00166372,0.0003233189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99025935,0.005208294,0.00040352222,0.00021537939,0.0025641595,0.0013493448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061246967,0.0006737974,0.00085550116,0.001901262,0.009744622,0.008734957,0.0013981169,0.0114945145,0.006629295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033223107,0.0007846588,0.0004665798,0.0014003629,0.007512568,0.009817861,0.0038029747,0.018919183,0.002612029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069474136,0.000007777367,0.00011781203,0.000046728637,0.0000036707909,0.000034051227,0.00056872517,0.000045010675,0.000018856721,0.016977534,0.9703847,0.011788239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005500664,0.0000043122163,0.0005135395,0.0002827066,0.0000034575262,0.000059029862,0.00090341526,0.00005070502,0.000025024703,0.009494679,0.9886436,0.000014177628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07005435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1791154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92994565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008295081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012102505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1392932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590793414","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v11i2.3794","title":"Approaches to Copyright Education for Faculty in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Political science; Copyright law; Public relations; Library science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Intellectual property; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.3527427208566833,"score_gpt":0.4521605180051952,"score_spread":0.0994177971485119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590793414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7138857,0.003391846,0.005097465,0.037629873,0.0008711583,0.0011248431,0.0003405665,0.00052089785,0.23713756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.851966,0.001899159,0.006349192,0.0034585597,0.00012395368,0.00021408394,0.00014253164,0.00006730361,0.13577923],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924705,0.00095171394,0.00026100178,0.00074065645,0.0029336975,0.0026424627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813897,0.0023241742,0.0011129518,0.00059564854,0.007268342,0.007309215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057686362,0.0004066708,0.00025124403,0.004056406,0.035556234,0.00907933,0.0037190716,0.0022043723,0.016286183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016849091,0.00044649962,0.00045050727,0.0045749,0.005980959,0.002660032,0.00667732,0.0024654146,0.0011767363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015468567,0.00090406084,0.06243455,0.0005149776,0.00003567103,0.0019621183,0.3195387,0.0011338734,0.0056653074,0.039578933,0.054728545,0.5133485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048818496,0.00025352163,0.079562224,0.00030664212,0.00004138208,0.0004222321,0.21983127,0.00085417036,0.0032253829,0.0037019071,0.6916153,0.0001371442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9342537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97178143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8334546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16654536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3006097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9666892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591491183","doi":"10.7202/1038711ar","title":"La contribution des blogues juridiques à la connaissance, à la critique et aux transformations du droit","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04938963240995386,"score_gpt":0.40459479334492676,"score_spread":0.3552051609349729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591491183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34707955,0.014458799,0.0045570694,0.0476318,0.002184453,0.00010762482,0.001302558,0.00020895258,0.5824692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.832869,0.0072453017,0.0012163494,0.0030975833,0.000359758,0.00006190276,0.00027149485,0.00015137055,0.15472734],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978562,0.00065223454,0.00004835866,0.00023506343,0.0008070414,0.00040112328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99372214,0.0022648522,0.00047696946,0.00041516408,0.002034542,0.0010863076],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002393124,0.00046547301,0.00040307673,0.0033557394,0.018523006,0.014542548,0.0010337721,0.001697197,0.018283665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077046463,0.00028922016,0.00018883977,0.006226719,0.011499902,0.005121192,0.0036709672,0.0031332327,0.0015213426],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015619604,0.000051975127,0.024851505,0.00074354146,0.0000408356,0.0014521707,0.5349363,0.0002929201,0.0023809886,0.2678602,0.06266588,0.10456755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010996308,0.000021850843,0.033129748,0.0007321273,0.000027957036,0.00029496668,0.18923545,0.00017694398,0.0005955929,0.005641583,0.77006286,0.00006989283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6684589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8550388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022878218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033100482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66698724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591920703","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Manitoba Statutes: Library","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Library science; Law; Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.0874145111210326,"score_gpt":0.35375844570387427,"score_spread":0.26634393458284167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591920703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008401784,0.002220451,0.00037783486,0.009408085,0.00049944286,0.00031638847,0.015985036,0.00081725104,0.9619737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013910995,0.00083217665,0.0005918767,0.0028705166,0.00007301184,0.00023768522,0.0025130338,0.00014449673,0.97882617],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998298,0.00015977357,0.00008840861,0.00012075557,0.00095250295,0.00038054344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962565,0.0006665894,0.00015779374,0.00023576853,0.0023707107,0.0003126388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017799506,0.0007623128,0.00052387954,0.003900816,0.008986244,0.008121412,0.0027016916,0.0061000506,0.124868885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006229886,0.001127442,0.00042985624,0.0073493533,0.002256403,0.0020613747,0.0027120577,0.0047125057,0.02318759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008552193,0.00014821676,0.004203812,0.00025770743,0.0000133789645,0.00032241002,0.0015501257,0.00023822817,0.00035425823,0.10380062,0.8520779,0.036947824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043238557,0.000013241505,0.012215278,0.00035735432,0.000016516608,0.00007677381,0.0013286336,0.0001976015,0.00047904145,0.002610805,0.9826248,0.000036764708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8211664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9164265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9722493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02775065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.069612496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.417728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592327897","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2913006","title":"A Flex Time JD: New Approaches to the Accessibility of Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"FLEX; Legal education; Computer science; Psychology; Business; Political science; Law; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.1120325877420232,"score_gpt":0.3969968224137107,"score_spread":0.2849642346716875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592327897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022121007,0.00902458,0.19009651,0.3606689,0.0042668795,0.00031312212,0.00027049455,0.0008725124,0.4123659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7160879,0.007318287,0.14437298,0.025000794,0.0027745925,0.0008500156,0.000119479664,0.0007319121,0.10274404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893602,0.00550755,0.00048432668,0.0011406001,0.0024571684,0.0010501308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9575821,0.024917396,0.0017048194,0.005472738,0.004625753,0.005697033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013973209,0.00055100693,0.00079948985,0.0052885534,0.006674326,0.020567192,0.0039267195,0.012289431,0.06481157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0490519,0.0007176245,0.0014537825,0.002577929,0.02080947,0.045664866,0.014764944,0.011835089,0.003667531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067370835,0.0001174155,0.0010093432,0.00017337418,0.000011724401,0.00021971401,0.007351105,0.00030154854,0.00028595177,0.86903363,0.026277732,0.09515113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048353988,0.00006984589,0.0014750671,0.00047619382,0.00003862889,0.00043025037,0.010671833,0.0022768832,0.000708066,0.83098775,0.1527448,0.00007235736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072629224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01133397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06481157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007967692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010771365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2168163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592669511","doi":"","title":"Socrates and Cicero: Functionality as Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Cicero; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Epistemology; Socratic method; Law; Literature; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.024681444636005034,"score_gpt":0.36333249296888714,"score_spread":0.3386510483328821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592669511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028482651,0.01388593,0.036799237,0.12417067,0.0024060844,0.00007875088,0.00008482661,0.00009751423,0.7939944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94333154,0.0046448563,0.005259307,0.0139309745,0.0011785622,0.00014246201,0.000033293207,0.00014699575,0.031332053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98973197,0.005656153,0.0003786327,0.0009547636,0.0022450634,0.0010334065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99152535,0.0050893454,0.00050099794,0.0008592293,0.0012670769,0.0007578681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008920649,0.00091622205,0.0006807,0.0041605304,0.009143877,0.014699186,0.0012137295,0.0067926017,0.0047987592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01823909,0.00042898653,0.00086192385,0.0024956546,0.07884969,0.018710187,0.007504466,0.008375418,0.00063579116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005607489,0.000002174306,0.00006839397,0.000013461459,0.0000010575702,0.000024408679,0.0061750105,0.000026742397,0.000021053318,0.9896365,0.0020998307,0.0019258502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002164022,0.000027580718,0.0005753907,0.00040989625,0.000011062107,0.00023676337,0.010142113,0.00032134244,0.00026986928,0.76364744,0.2242994,0.000037532423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011586976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0102144815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014699186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00953036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006214492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069147944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595448966","doi":"10.21125/inted.2017.1197","title":"“IT’S ALL ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP”: EXPLORING A SUCCESSFUL PUBLIC-PRIVATE TEACHING AND LEARNING PARTNERSHIP AT A CANADIAN UNIVERSITY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INTED proceedings","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Public–private partnership; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.20785686273667503,"score_gpt":0.37556174499001127,"score_spread":0.16770488225333624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595448966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58073395,0.0014201357,0.0056352452,0.18848523,0.0011663884,0.0007506312,0.00016526252,0.0001275566,0.2215156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93493634,0.0007175993,0.0033907192,0.012695666,0.00006764086,0.00020656968,0.0000459442,0.00009214108,0.047847398],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97980714,0.008676194,0.00017008664,0.0009256406,0.002868167,0.0075527984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820416,0.00286516,0.0005533469,0.00031456086,0.0020079636,0.012217345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009385175,0.0006615934,0.0005985242,0.0012583055,0.13512631,0.022671338,0.0053298003,0.009429674,0.010631691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012490459,0.0007149595,0.0009397415,0.0021879412,0.036296993,0.008232278,0.017754035,0.01522336,0.001177643],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006210514,0.0002448882,0.0035657042,0.00011003881,0.000016008864,0.0032825838,0.8748163,0.0003538285,0.0008683295,0.06774649,0.030666048,0.018267717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011492344,0.000033407156,0.0013941356,0.00009827997,0.000009198839,0.0002820322,0.93216956,0.00016271345,0.00014918657,0.0033235527,0.062322084,0.00004436467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85194963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95453954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90573967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09426035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25719187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6839099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595682237","doi":"","title":"Institutional Dimensions of Communications and Information Technology in Canadian law schools","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information technology; Communications law; Information and Communications Technology; Public relations; Telecommunications; Political science; Law; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02251020853189849,"score_gpt":0.3212597671276201,"score_spread":0.2987495585957216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595682237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73954934,0.0014224676,0.0019040329,0.028984055,0.00007007777,0.000121574805,0.0004522201,0.000084707375,0.22741154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992916,0.00027431865,0.00028216213,0.00029227816,0.000011569077,0.000016725822,0.000036822876,0.000010942315,0.006159069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98719096,0.0024512324,0.0003230595,0.00071473955,0.0034198621,0.005900207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706607,0.008987551,0.0031196729,0.00063624844,0.0071766335,0.009419087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005279568,0.00026685747,0.00038976732,0.0070004403,0.025609488,0.02206853,0.002022264,0.0022837578,0.011284403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025083479,0.0005842341,0.00041553436,0.011756771,0.020497182,0.004847944,0.00457858,0.003807819,0.0003327581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007658875,0.00020615521,0.05837826,0.000068432244,0.0000221088,0.00027162628,0.052339863,0.0020218543,0.0003519026,0.85049504,0.007707154,0.02806102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006793685,0.00011942726,0.42813385,0.0006037147,0.00015471214,0.0001415059,0.30013132,0.0056134006,0.0011134208,0.08437712,0.17928183,0.0002618616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98641115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7594757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24052432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34911516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8808842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596830003","doi":"","title":"Privilege and Limitations: The Impact of Raising the Discoverability of Claims on Solicitor-Client Privilege","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Privilege (computing); Waiver; Discoverability; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03946639791377807,"score_gpt":0.37342911849171884,"score_spread":0.33396272057794074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596830003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5029088,0.0030120201,0.02882356,0.07807215,0.000596675,0.00017015779,0.0000691487,0.00012912002,0.38621837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945966,0.0002238621,0.0010275315,0.001422556,0.000118574986,0.000041242078,0.0000042188567,0.00001445811,0.0025509049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95943874,0.014971405,0.0016795793,0.003170807,0.015485559,0.005253932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7624759,0.19325645,0.014481437,0.013928481,0.008908576,0.0069492166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037231453,0.00046730333,0.0010150394,0.002540901,0.011061082,0.015750077,0.0036591962,0.010708918,0.012972304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20638935,0.0007830298,0.0012009814,0.0011028749,0.041544247,0.023891248,0.01834517,0.01401145,0.00091937406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002264396,0.00017768364,0.009145711,0.0000923352,0.000032883156,0.0014534355,0.016484173,0.0011676712,0.0018103666,0.9457033,0.0012831503,0.022422915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016207852,0.000513511,0.018274006,0.0009320408,0.00018793871,0.0024488522,0.025866121,0.005120403,0.003780547,0.8971868,0.045292735,0.00023485014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022161974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017988656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037231453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011922012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017284077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19690114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597055904","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: The Vault - Justice Institute of British Columbia's Institutional Repository: What goes in The Vault","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vault (architecture); Economic Justice; Advertising; Political science; Art; Business; Law; Visual arts","score_opus":0.05934125666411053,"score_gpt":0.3509630680962626,"score_spread":0.29162181143215204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597055904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022171423,0.02425095,0.0009176531,0.26325053,0.0031918858,0.00019178637,0.0037922552,0.0012732542,0.68096036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07887139,0.0052297227,0.0016226307,0.010905849,0.00027544063,0.00012301364,0.0010949686,0.0003874552,0.90148956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976406,0.0004226103,0.000098970864,0.0001515723,0.0010760961,0.0006101842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98805666,0.0017514856,0.00031372922,0.00073682825,0.0043947664,0.0047464515],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034891875,0.0003553468,0.00044323705,0.0027297826,0.018782247,0.025651917,0.0025646347,0.00718043,0.09256049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013172632,0.00051999884,0.00021019633,0.0049168193,0.00553606,0.0077015995,0.005984521,0.0049103242,0.009733222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027287295,0.000046043115,0.0029384908,0.00016382747,0.0000062453582,0.00026410766,0.003298754,0.00006984761,0.00010164279,0.04091111,0.8775078,0.074664816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008266562,0.0000074713944,0.006261494,0.0005162685,0.000008138526,0.00007980036,0.0095973965,0.00012506952,0.00013527779,0.0050095054,0.978214,0.000037250175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6809695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90595776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97434807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030651907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11135903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6418187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598932699","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Authorised Law Reports: Australia – Commonwealth","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.14688033596624198,"score_gpt":0.4412786352511648,"score_spread":0.2943982992849228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598932699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004830262,0.004113605,0.0029361048,0.007515124,0.001584316,0.0011502075,0.05609862,0.005610357,0.9161615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035682444,0.0014144343,0.0017169135,0.00060499826,0.00014911625,0.00022433643,0.0074420176,0.0009869504,0.98389304],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995609,0.0006524099,0.00064035825,0.00027107674,0.0025242,0.00030306765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96660376,0.006666802,0.0027664963,0.0019859546,0.019931989,0.0020450072],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046682367,0.000722887,0.0008579649,0.010394199,0.0031702525,0.010850434,0.0014306912,0.002988231,0.32831663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028543558,0.0013991012,0.0004517899,0.014305642,0.0012301345,0.004998821,0.0024131117,0.002111778,0.19406469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014803182,0.000026545342,0.00038784766,0.00019611567,0.0000019290637,0.00004142061,0.00050203735,0.000042322317,0.00008595484,0.003199153,0.9693924,0.026109464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045249576,0.0000060361285,0.0028046845,0.00012510412,0.0000020349653,0.000031132062,0.00026025422,0.000058761354,0.00012701728,0.00036427137,0.9962042,0.000012079288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12254301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19347835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060007875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026854774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9580748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599173460","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1239","title":"Book Notes: The Sense of Justice Empathy in Law and Punishment, by Markus Dirk Dubber","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Empathy; Economic Justice; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.024346111322714525,"score_gpt":0.34963023515529795,"score_spread":0.3252841238325834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599173460","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012466388,0.27467126,0.002425282,0.5514453,0.032028858,0.00004490586,0.0003219903,0.00007350762,0.13774227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04173995,0.15726988,0.0026508456,0.19132763,0.039532814,0.00028262072,0.00026698317,0.00037729903,0.56655186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991371,0.0003771635,0.000038550475,0.00014857142,0.00024714047,0.000051425275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966995,0.0026139359,0.00007354767,0.00008909085,0.0003923644,0.000131584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013198484,0.0010639167,0.0007509531,0.0017826732,0.0053637056,0.0060472554,0.0013461064,0.0067967875,0.010534115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046823733,0.0007401941,0.00032029918,0.0022508693,0.010577768,0.011861216,0.0025651448,0.008904391,0.0039013582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007146415,0.000010338417,0.000065519765,0.00007436197,0.0000032216483,0.00003193602,0.001682918,0.000053976364,0.0000463068,0.064301275,0.9241709,0.009552041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000085367665,0.000009955641,0.0007217069,0.00034234603,0.0000048704105,0.00012624172,0.0025499607,0.000084260326,0.00011205396,0.057290766,0.93872625,0.000023033383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03265161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08474461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03265161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036047758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031780908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06492311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599494580","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4808","title":"LEARNING FROM BEAR-WALKER: INDIGENOUS LEGAL ORDERS AND INTERCULTURAL LEGAL EDUCATION IN CANADIAN LAW SCHOOLS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal profession; Law; Legal education; Political science; Viewpoints; Legal research; Sociology; Empowerment; Legal realism","score_opus":0.03796338000169707,"score_gpt":0.3857957892049488,"score_spread":0.3478324092032517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599494580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.678115,0.0017736765,0.0018920125,0.053959507,0.00023255344,0.00016381993,0.000062390434,0.000089814384,0.26371118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96449715,0.0010896462,0.0014860363,0.0020237693,0.000016256618,0.000023828574,0.000023439019,0.000020580654,0.030819314],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958295,0.001000959,0.000056121437,0.00033263137,0.0011861826,0.0015945764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996253,0.0007519347,0.00024617973,0.000108204,0.00082961435,0.0018110769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004245339,0.00037038888,0.00030097284,0.0021703711,0.051706437,0.00891726,0.0021572495,0.0023026173,0.009642933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007107811,0.0003587298,0.00027725907,0.0020772042,0.017608274,0.0045148586,0.008146846,0.004348815,0.00039700302],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019443829,0.00024780838,0.012749277,0.00010180922,0.000005603648,0.00072122674,0.8028514,0.00026215796,0.000614257,0.07128878,0.018455993,0.092682205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006898807,0.00004500424,0.018559705,0.00022924674,0.0000120899795,0.00012524112,0.79772353,0.00027207087,0.00039902513,0.005534785,0.17704438,0.000048064874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9809629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9073747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09262533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18021357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6720469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599625897","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Advantage: American Illness and Comparative Civil Procedure","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; American exceptionalism; Exceptionalism; Globalization; Political science; Convergence (economics); Law; Economics; Economic growth; Economy","score_opus":0.01814002576587317,"score_gpt":0.33988598429890965,"score_spread":0.3217459585330365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599625897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26497343,0.018135572,0.00044862303,0.039525345,0.00062268006,0.00004755459,0.0004976822,0.000021720189,0.6757273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814076,0.006426579,0.00019309757,0.0025651313,0.00011331233,0.000016341228,0.00014668249,0.000015630727,0.009115623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951139,0.0005571926,0.00007809203,0.00022377784,0.0017250301,0.0023020061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947889,0.0012053198,0.00059798197,0.0001973715,0.0017708718,0.0014394656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025096328,0.00028931006,0.00042221198,0.006833139,0.021521486,0.006530247,0.00116208,0.0016313896,0.012199872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012168767,0.00013018702,0.00035918405,0.012040913,0.01593149,0.0031974274,0.0049567553,0.0025431302,0.00032725156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013180834,0.00006069156,0.039384656,0.00015297472,0.000027981117,0.0005648841,0.064384624,0.00019406006,0.00011934709,0.8062318,0.033974566,0.054772694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044367607,0.00006215757,0.2629245,0.00094228936,0.00010318877,0.00079186907,0.29933664,0.00038256554,0.00020106447,0.054231983,0.38085195,0.00012735723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9747182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086726636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086726636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06847475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62924874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599813865","doi":"","title":"COULD COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION COMPANIES IMPROVE ACCESS TO JUSTICE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Legal service; Economic Justice; Corporate law; Business; Profit (economics); Corporate structure; Legal profession; Law; Public relations; Accounting; Political science; Corporate governance; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.04908567714572008,"score_gpt":0.4133352650883119,"score_spread":0.3642495879425918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599813865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1569713,0.0019037242,0.007154116,0.35911372,0.0010730242,0.00038062752,0.0001881185,0.0005426397,0.47267273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88138276,0.0008350578,0.0037512255,0.0466919,0.0007250491,0.0002235075,0.00013573335,0.00012260988,0.06613212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97995627,0.0065269717,0.00024470774,0.0013030138,0.0038933929,0.008075568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94238555,0.01605524,0.004050483,0.0049201637,0.009701224,0.022887433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015414135,0.00037489497,0.00052045524,0.0026006398,0.0071411454,0.012270662,0.0030251055,0.013408213,0.04302221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0741381,0.00040042456,0.00066148053,0.0016153266,0.008462839,0.012097479,0.016197028,0.0055083963,0.0056619537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002730246,0.0023267379,0.03452992,0.0004007394,0.00011742921,0.00093609025,0.011439146,0.0013124034,0.0018669593,0.61792755,0.13273509,0.19613494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005621532,0.0014578307,0.047439266,0.0012457985,0.00014274695,0.000999267,0.023628747,0.0034668855,0.0030484237,0.16060585,0.75719064,0.00021242596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027237998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042820964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04302221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007118509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02853442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14392364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600983359","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Treaties","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.23081986901313,"score_gpt":0.46769370739574495,"score_spread":0.23687383838261494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600983359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034676763,0.007643796,0.00125658,0.017177211,0.0026119426,0.0007198879,0.03845373,0.0011772739,0.9306129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014434479,0.0054567945,0.002563066,0.004198012,0.00022350973,0.00041006517,0.010041904,0.00054172036,0.97512144],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757924,0.001416997,0.0011603207,0.00074466754,0.018598376,0.002287204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509659,0.0055492646,0.0008084892,0.0018807543,0.038933404,0.0018622068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01278184,0.002163874,0.0020673738,0.021692561,0.01845304,0.02021272,0.006281208,0.010920916,0.28156218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045644194,0.0027152968,0.0019896887,0.03093169,0.0046553486,0.007945609,0.00355192,0.008437142,0.11292316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004662024,0.000008873785,0.00003702457,0.0000882268,0.0000016791498,0.000006924654,0.000075715674,0.000035212637,0.000011534339,0.009572172,0.98188156,0.008276444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058498676,0.0000019663098,0.00048281258,0.0002998059,0.0000072670987,0.0000092426,0.00018118677,0.000035763776,0.000052700652,0.0015167372,0.9973846,0.000021956921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95757204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9801705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28156218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08947107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.308575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9419193},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2601398572","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Authorised Law Reports: Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04321082073353175,"score_gpt":0.34603132718285734,"score_spread":0.30282050644932557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601398572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003999854,0.0049445545,0.0012739822,0.012335289,0.0016677736,0.0009301304,0.16234043,0.003891807,0.80861604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056490204,0.002793878,0.0014205712,0.0010655022,0.00012523394,0.00014447686,0.015252202,0.0008129211,0.9727361],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99312943,0.0003016692,0.00049255707,0.00036060702,0.0049756984,0.00074007956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94759345,0.0041690012,0.0016741878,0.0012035285,0.041862354,0.0034974695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033962573,0.0011547826,0.0010251293,0.012087641,0.009793684,0.015101402,0.0033683456,0.0038042068,0.27454817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025546238,0.0015985507,0.0006469782,0.027008818,0.0018573534,0.0029364983,0.0019318112,0.0021522853,0.08727041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009227169,0.000013930007,0.00048698878,0.00011391845,0.000002639857,0.000029096407,0.00020059946,0.000066003544,0.000038477283,0.002270637,0.985713,0.011055612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008287121,0.00000334521,0.0039074146,0.00013762353,0.0000051709844,0.00001842415,0.00039260837,0.000102456455,0.00012292311,0.00025166324,0.99502254,0.000027511975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98040956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27454817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056754116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26434237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9184551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601889647","doi":"","title":"‘Room Left to Grow’: Canada’s First Aboriginal Justice Minister One Year In","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.034877808526987665,"score_gpt":0.36523165828272297,"score_spread":0.3303538497557353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601889647","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118520215,0.0043002455,0.0003951525,0.81798655,0.0129641425,0.00012373296,0.00020842327,0.00008147367,0.045420058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48610955,0.002024787,0.00067721365,0.32804698,0.0010439134,0.000102954335,0.00013691727,0.00027266983,0.18158506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877643,0.0014662676,0.00015844179,0.0005431661,0.0014459974,0.008621794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778556,0.0011888227,0.00035750016,0.0001887546,0.002298605,0.018110663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006011688,0.00064832135,0.001102314,0.00076483516,0.10265859,0.016063862,0.004303566,0.024254318,0.011680183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012661497,0.0011352559,0.0010138579,0.0011941844,0.014521167,0.0049815276,0.011285664,0.05539554,0.0014481823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015334494,0.0001991001,0.0070646587,0.00016422666,0.00005040361,0.008307865,0.2532833,0.00021465041,0.0008526816,0.03383806,0.67741966,0.0184521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023441604,0.000056617373,0.009099483,0.00029321082,0.00002351029,0.0006027857,0.41048673,0.00009732848,0.0002454282,0.0018574091,0.57709235,0.000121773184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9675731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8884903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11150971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32290706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8090634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602033633","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4368","title":"JUDGING SELECTION: APPOINTING CANADIAN JUDGES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Political science; Humanities; Commission; Law; Art","score_opus":0.09361937532165128,"score_gpt":0.4106273228878456,"score_spread":0.3170079475661943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602033633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08620555,0.01876802,0.017362809,0.14276935,0.0066325907,0.00082634063,0.0005697496,0.00038067315,0.72648495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7242582,0.015547585,0.025188679,0.0145832235,0.0012031525,0.00023012153,0.00050900073,0.0002604046,0.21821967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761755,0.005314003,0.0006244207,0.0019970734,0.0085692825,0.0073196986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97230196,0.0041742916,0.00087473536,0.0008116556,0.014984395,0.00685297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022406852,0.000466335,0.00052342634,0.004343413,0.033382107,0.012073595,0.003321359,0.0034048187,0.008432539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04370461,0.0007756759,0.0003765307,0.005816903,0.011944682,0.0026987419,0.0045627733,0.0048379404,0.0015470344],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119429715,0.0000645601,0.023408627,0.00036575997,0.000027227476,0.001073072,0.043769017,0.0016606748,0.0013309079,0.23431222,0.416421,0.27744755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000313483,0.00004253415,0.018769482,0.00042394115,0.000024618943,0.00014885004,0.022863902,0.001033914,0.00054371014,0.014292399,0.94167656,0.00014873157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9780386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99377257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8821737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11782627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2774083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85489345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602416461","doi":"","title":"Reflective Practice & Reflective Inquiry: A Critical Imperative for Enhancing Law Student Learning and Legal Professionalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective practice; Legal education; Operationalization; Legal profession; Legal practice; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Curriculum; Economic Justice; Psychology; Practice of law; Lifelong learning; Political science; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05979861176545198,"score_gpt":0.5304043226780903,"score_spread":0.47060571091263836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602416461","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016538216,0.022775317,0.19655856,0.65235955,0.004816706,0.0008390809,0.000040809522,0.000513254,0.10555849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55812824,0.022759078,0.2962659,0.09070373,0.0053528766,0.002699943,0.0000975133,0.00045192192,0.023540823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82832444,0.13194054,0.004927182,0.0071986653,0.024208212,0.0034009668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6799013,0.24304329,0.014212265,0.023588788,0.02231484,0.016939476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12828007,0.0010560494,0.0016739076,0.0029610603,0.0101024965,0.02819979,0.0037604908,0.011739427,0.002779447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.166611,0.0011618591,0.0010686,0.0013925835,0.08536629,0.022935115,0.017374093,0.019873297,0.0016170447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039515635,0.00033249223,0.0018848827,0.0016083164,0.00009754402,0.00049630855,0.19430928,0.0006528714,0.0009661281,0.634842,0.042415306,0.12235535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055810146,0.00013361449,0.0010357621,0.0042750724,0.000037100996,0.0009645585,0.057873413,0.0006926902,0.0009839142,0.63317597,0.30064577,0.00012625851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002252234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026852805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12828007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008386716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043976013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.678418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602437525","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Statutory Compilation Table","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Table (database); Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.38930601372837187,"score_gpt":0.5595117266839229,"score_spread":0.17020571295555104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602437525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076906965,0.0035492538,0.0026523708,0.010761419,0.0031650043,0.0028442233,0.2916555,0.0021335997,0.6824695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004281333,0.005983328,0.014258642,0.0035292667,0.00037895926,0.0035652488,0.11222984,0.0014748212,0.8542986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773735,0.001446145,0.0016617557,0.0010429954,0.01663204,0.0018434894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85372794,0.017581357,0.0016122508,0.005102014,0.11878282,0.0031935785],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015910693,0.001715699,0.0019422282,0.030653942,0.011977801,0.013285903,0.0050532287,0.0047460916,0.33973745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07053388,0.0025090051,0.0015822306,0.040293075,0.0034487331,0.0043728473,0.0027252547,0.005454037,0.13556746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011447175,0.000013808111,0.000100403624,0.00021573337,0.0000017796227,0.000007493149,0.00009237776,0.00004096077,0.000029791154,0.0051337914,0.9835824,0.010770011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018507766,0.0000046603277,0.0025433237,0.0004936614,0.00000972548,0.000014180698,0.00033706066,0.00007823065,0.0001412476,0.0015510018,0.9947778,0.000030702864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.960499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97494656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33973745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07923568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31628728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9417844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602791599","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Authorised Law Reports: New Zealand","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.062446807928047215,"score_gpt":0.3783477776381505,"score_spread":0.3159009697101033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602791599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006759419,0.004880318,0.002459843,0.006461716,0.0012401673,0.0013407303,0.0914535,0.005090952,0.88031334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0052886056,0.0025187037,0.0021418221,0.0003730763,0.00014927555,0.0002540023,0.01138251,0.0011057844,0.9767864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582386,0.00038488818,0.00071357546,0.00028833834,0.0025252623,0.0002641106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97187173,0.0053549553,0.002936639,0.0017672565,0.01618268,0.0018867697],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004786069,0.0009770707,0.00084692513,0.010440749,0.0028275857,0.009459536,0.001584445,0.0027434793,0.3657144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028806875,0.0013357792,0.0005210345,0.017327126,0.0013401903,0.0049990197,0.0018890486,0.0016633177,0.16026753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003586125,0.000036393063,0.0010414366,0.00045795555,0.000004015482,0.0001032639,0.001172232,0.00006006855,0.00024134092,0.00299389,0.9484112,0.045442477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012166171,0.00000929972,0.005848024,0.000159534,0.000004449816,0.0000419363,0.00052664854,0.000056099252,0.00019412888,0.0002650645,0.9928647,0.00001784861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36507586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5099473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3657144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067929938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029413356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9047314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603976016","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4843","title":"BEING THE CHANGE: SOCIAL JUSTICE IN EXTERNSHIP PROGRAM EVALUATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Social justice; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Public relations; Narrative; Sociology; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Pedagogy; Social science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.3521164757445121,"score_gpt":0.5410518283749198,"score_spread":0.18893535263040773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603976016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5997239,0.006829194,0.040048227,0.1052916,0.002822332,0.0118968105,0.0003497517,0.00023587426,0.23280235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96730745,0.0006500099,0.015360055,0.00570157,0.0002013799,0.0072725,0.000068490255,0.00006068502,0.00337797],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.61495066,0.34750858,0.008465899,0.003553319,0.016802805,0.008718773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67444056,0.25669798,0.015933054,0.011009009,0.025087448,0.016831992],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.30266765,0.00055585755,0.0011495409,0.003364973,0.012946905,0.01764653,0.002581389,0.00341179,0.0069309045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32165948,0.0006208985,0.0012674315,0.0029748727,0.017239844,0.012155497,0.02169629,0.006003954,0.00052676094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017032715,0.005193327,0.057694685,0.0029345897,0.00032350028,0.0008424644,0.22445138,0.001372918,0.00055771397,0.20353736,0.031007636,0.47038126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019622175,0.00982162,0.08755717,0.01701468,0.00080386497,0.0009583375,0.49726465,0.008116235,0.004594174,0.19221814,0.17927024,0.00041867048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050558588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019809121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30266765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021704795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039585736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8599349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605232142","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4807","title":"OUTSIDER EDUCATION: INDIGENOUS LAW AND LAND-BASED LEARNING","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Political science; Indigenous education; Humanities; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Law; Ethnology; Geography; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07382627404369328,"score_gpt":0.43296131928994275,"score_spread":0.35913504524624945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605232142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27610677,0.004769913,0.0028954777,0.017856935,0.0003349011,0.00005593195,0.00002173729,0.00009581269,0.6978625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9191283,0.0033234372,0.0021329902,0.0015018048,0.00008959086,0.000026389625,0.00002397794,0.00004668374,0.073726915],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976494,0.00097041397,0.0000313953,0.00020110444,0.0005503259,0.00059747964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874204,0.0003914734,0.00009233435,0.00008834433,0.00010617741,0.0005796114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022067493,0.00025603425,0.00029445055,0.0009645302,0.01219419,0.008573249,0.0013745793,0.0012034492,0.010378133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023133208,0.00013504246,0.00024016612,0.0010484502,0.014598291,0.003879135,0.008256708,0.0024148168,0.0005150199],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001702731,0.00042475702,0.0052322564,0.00019643402,0.000008008666,0.0012781932,0.5962339,0.0001768509,0.0010239846,0.19384073,0.013006919,0.18856089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005827241,0.00008912881,0.013613891,0.0006185666,0.000014900503,0.0006965404,0.49817455,0.0002564403,0.0005580146,0.023320181,0.4626177,0.000034182358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20440611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4692191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20440611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010945883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015597589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4064327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605481763","doi":"","title":"All in the Family (of Licensees): Pragmatic Approaches to Implementing Paralegal Integration into Family Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Family law; Law; Competence (human resources); Political science; Monopoly; Legal profession; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.11172415544488148,"score_gpt":0.3741320805876767,"score_spread":0.2624079251427952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605481763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37589246,0.0031902955,0.066270076,0.3094845,0.0010114841,0.0017236586,0.00004216931,0.00023841322,0.24214688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96941435,0.0006572553,0.0130249355,0.010025551,0.00006652838,0.00043481757,0.000009225506,0.000028615983,0.006338754],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773089,0.018772526,0.00036050103,0.0007111161,0.0009010915,0.0019459111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98045945,0.01167025,0.0009581457,0.0007997015,0.0012836498,0.004828763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023387346,0.00033855022,0.0003424204,0.0007842922,0.015003328,0.0053913165,0.002602507,0.004596398,0.008180602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040821273,0.00039356845,0.00047858048,0.000526712,0.012537792,0.01018736,0.013082004,0.005844029,0.00054383057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085580425,0.00096984574,0.0058034817,0.00054530497,0.00005090584,0.005623198,0.5283189,0.0007800926,0.0017858151,0.28160512,0.026519043,0.14791267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010193873,0.00045723203,0.005473053,0.0013721391,0.0000516752,0.0021724177,0.71150595,0.0016013791,0.00082563673,0.10341781,0.17293794,0.00008286721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011940069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034612138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023387346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070903464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026187284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12368554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606597006","doi":"","title":"LIVING BY PERCENTAGES: A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE ON THE ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF LAWYERS ACTING AS TALENT AGENTS AND MANAGERS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Perspective (graphical); Duty; Public relations; Scholarship; Business; Competence (human resources); Professional responsibility; Loyalty; Entertainment; Legal service; Work (physics); Duty of care; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Marketing; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02438528281335842,"score_gpt":0.36760768782744796,"score_spread":0.3432224050140895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606597006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060555432,0.017945021,0.003963343,0.45424536,0.0011783309,0.00010529791,0.00010613107,0.000043422264,0.46185756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87345594,0.015750038,0.0033863392,0.04921084,0.0003376639,0.000058179146,0.000042989002,0.000078589765,0.057679467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870651,0.0036391546,0.00021029227,0.00085251953,0.0033564717,0.0048764846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98768604,0.003720019,0.0007563911,0.000281226,0.0030865686,0.0044698063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009031365,0.0006081594,0.0006055644,0.00334102,0.060159486,0.017613297,0.0043178643,0.010187375,0.007449649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014096114,0.00053754455,0.00057068083,0.0042371606,0.051110737,0.0072343047,0.0065417993,0.01394637,0.0005170637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019802044,0.000035813606,0.0022746027,0.00007804021,0.000007197733,0.0010545662,0.1937281,0.00029612408,0.00020623542,0.7537448,0.03252021,0.01603446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022562295,0.00003009797,0.007545936,0.00079398614,0.000030223726,0.0006937132,0.32315305,0.0008782379,0.00020595278,0.090106495,0.576364,0.00017572298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9882951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20566504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20566504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25669762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92131597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606622415","doi":"10.71781/16462","title":"The authority of moral conscience in Joseph Butler's ethics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.18971465469259577,"score_gpt":0.5077961984316173,"score_spread":0.31808154373902153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606622415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018622879,0.032432914,0.01248767,0.24451514,0.001774667,0.000050524563,0.000059471313,0.00004176165,0.69001496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8142116,0.012557487,0.0039049867,0.012949471,0.0015163798,0.00007021613,0.00002460365,0.000061713275,0.15470345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671245,0.0018676864,0.000075490934,0.0002303012,0.00073780556,0.00037625144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620926,0.0025823945,0.000158086,0.00019192875,0.0005636604,0.0002947251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047469046,0.0002565408,0.00031239414,0.0009252848,0.005367337,0.007201472,0.00085413357,0.0035158643,0.003437341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086805355,0.00024541112,0.00018208496,0.0009565272,0.03138024,0.0035733653,0.0021709786,0.0044112043,0.00040962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032163061,0.0000024351782,0.000032862434,0.0000111777135,0.0000010145517,0.000027330938,0.0036792287,0.0000676019,0.000017862327,0.98638064,0.0076111527,0.0021654323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017336055,0.0000059654335,0.00051236514,0.00013917702,0.0000045039246,0.000058399815,0.002302914,0.00026778213,0.00014500415,0.745716,0.25081462,0.000016020758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11451263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1469876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11451263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013080926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012062124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22769219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606762169","doi":"10.71781/1993","title":"La relation changeante entre la Cour suprême du Canada et la société civile : l'impact des acteurs sociaux sur l'accès à la justice et la production du droit","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051058863413327445,"score_gpt":0.4127003215028356,"score_spread":0.36164145808950815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606762169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53714836,0.002272431,0.002493359,0.019987626,0.00017215812,0.000059883456,0.00047915653,0.000047421927,0.43733948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96711797,0.0007313543,0.00031254604,0.0006352032,0.000017709755,0.000014348502,0.000059194543,0.000016088772,0.031095617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974038,0.00050344557,0.000031745258,0.00022838048,0.0009450588,0.00088764523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972583,0.000561244,0.00023475775,0.000102670514,0.0009439838,0.0008990924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012296594,0.000255284,0.00027170428,0.0012536867,0.014396611,0.010626154,0.00086739974,0.0010622876,0.0119975675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033645574,0.00015850422,0.00022477978,0.0025477102,0.013074335,0.0018700643,0.0039175483,0.0024124472,0.0004670855],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006621947,0.000059964423,0.057853594,0.00014860627,0.000042011212,0.0006889878,0.23700231,0.00070873776,0.0012476373,0.6396118,0.01453942,0.04803082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016810047,0.000054564265,0.18157844,0.00048746596,0.000058709433,0.00018630599,0.3680601,0.0008636204,0.0009926023,0.030022314,0.41755608,0.00012300153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9604973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94139904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058600944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09874256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42518163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607326201","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4556","title":"Gavin Drewry, Louis Blom-Cooper, Charles Blake, The Court of Appeal","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Restructuring; Law; Legislation; Economic Justice; Political science; Scholarship; Subject (documents); Sociology; History; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09751438710130468,"score_gpt":0.38737287996961767,"score_spread":0.289858492868313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607326201","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069203144,0.077492505,0.0014456871,0.769825,0.00465719,0.000054059754,0.00027986703,0.00007704763,0.13924834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1937889,0.11210203,0.0032427905,0.21949615,0.004914493,0.00015140834,0.000328671,0.0003513437,0.46562424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996108,0.001334786,0.00014538411,0.0005263132,0.0015551092,0.00033044856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844349,0.009999788,0.0006462712,0.00027907707,0.0030455836,0.0015943783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00427933,0.00029203697,0.00038185247,0.0018881201,0.009827271,0.009547307,0.0013012952,0.005058258,0.018300463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025769165,0.0005632774,0.00015608562,0.0020020008,0.005219237,0.008780984,0.0025825705,0.008350201,0.0046371846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011608786,0.000024343144,0.0011441578,0.00007859172,0.0000040268765,0.00012330606,0.0034741473,0.00004684877,0.0000528797,0.10962358,0.86471367,0.020702722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007974184,0.000009108349,0.0029939043,0.000498123,0.0000045672164,0.00015609097,0.010327972,0.000111279696,0.00016798679,0.031783894,0.9539087,0.000030484267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056127485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17833053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056127485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068234247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010238876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11160159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607676879","doi":"10.4324/9781315449807-24","title":"Is access to the profession access to justice? Lessons from Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.20931505651697802,"score_gpt":0.4892967282583131,"score_spread":0.2799816717413351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607676879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032218304,0.06275775,0.00051692483,0.27427614,0.0013880677,0.000049037488,0.00046637066,0.00004822257,0.62827915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6122711,0.08858582,0.0012146381,0.02597893,0.0006252249,0.000054247197,0.0003320934,0.000096967255,0.27084115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741036,0.00023764619,0.000038342776,0.0001558171,0.00088124827,0.0012766009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969796,0.00067642634,0.00008375064,0.00006945967,0.0012035305,0.0009872252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018933419,0.00040493847,0.00053641415,0.0017551425,0.014806566,0.01015546,0.0017143682,0.0023725044,0.010387286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003717051,0.00023629528,0.00031517778,0.0042512733,0.010918486,0.004148359,0.002470875,0.00383392,0.00062314357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004321174,0.000054209802,0.0030646203,0.00041851832,0.000013860401,0.00094592903,0.05134834,0.00042326978,0.00025804894,0.5384358,0.30029908,0.10469512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013771127,0.00001687866,0.0076544615,0.0009154615,0.000017627048,0.00020817363,0.04818984,0.00029284877,0.00011479371,0.030265981,0.91226226,0.000047948568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99568224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81261253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18738744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23001711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9425154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607818865","doi":"","title":"Quarter century celebration for school for Legal Practice : news","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"De Rebus","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Legal education; Period (music); Political science; Legal practice; Law; History; Art","score_opus":0.06301921399854703,"score_gpt":0.42236587608899373,"score_spread":0.3593466620904467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607818865","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023726914,0.013553765,0.00029463274,0.72929204,0.17083707,0.000060143433,0.0005304639,0.00026567598,0.08279347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03788178,0.017593218,0.0010303966,0.344841,0.12938257,0.00021197714,0.0010492913,0.0004459871,0.46756375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766624,0.0003547636,0.00009709149,0.00023413167,0.0011118391,0.00053595676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936567,0.0016041858,0.0002894565,0.00038726692,0.0011113179,0.0029510148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036447502,0.0007562876,0.0003972157,0.0007841902,0.0037153247,0.0073979595,0.0011557775,0.008473917,0.051612943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0097200265,0.00041440994,0.00067292916,0.0007518066,0.0020033247,0.0044333986,0.0031684735,0.015092845,0.018432897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026121714,0.00004044877,0.00020253395,0.00006381984,0.0000027236952,0.00007515305,0.00019508191,0.0000060750936,0.00007222169,0.0018956673,0.9837404,0.013679703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009048453,0.000016039003,0.000976199,0.000090415386,0.0000021537896,0.000033738717,0.0003424136,0.000011288215,0.000057968027,0.00024581622,0.99820983,0.0000050466365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062715486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019720828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051612943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002736307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031922965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1726625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610263201","doi":"","title":"Court Governance: The Challenge of Change","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Mandate; Accountability; Corporate governance; Political science; Public administration; Law; Judicial review; Institution; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.11725451236170639,"score_gpt":0.36011969365183,"score_spread":0.2428651812901236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610263201","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023871128,0.010073596,0.01681894,0.79680735,0.0016517419,0.00007056359,0.000054264045,0.000087165405,0.1505652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94242716,0.004875581,0.004922507,0.03278004,0.0025185514,0.00016990966,0.00005130688,0.000056450273,0.012198523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96477705,0.019935897,0.00079291954,0.004117565,0.0057971883,0.0045793587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96642303,0.02049745,0.0019020633,0.0037702702,0.0034709598,0.0039361822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038399246,0.00040943065,0.0009495921,0.0018310603,0.008620412,0.020803675,0.0036333324,0.009219962,0.0038466197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040072482,0.00045061443,0.00072991534,0.0019149119,0.06235738,0.018263988,0.011897816,0.011985489,0.00075438875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006345268,0.000026505999,0.000415672,0.000033818083,0.0000093275,0.000060425748,0.0039617084,0.0005152425,0.000038271497,0.97582847,0.0066055562,0.012498687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002677041,0.000020142987,0.0006181449,0.00013796432,0.000005711797,0.000038620263,0.0050775013,0.00057532114,0.00004075562,0.90603405,0.08740946,0.000015603771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012778651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008218943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038399246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017582878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021149335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20307708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610816547","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1314","title":"The \"Ambitious Modesty\" of Harry Arthurs' Humane Professionalism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Normative; Legal education; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.04079411867215693,"score_gpt":0.3749037266108592,"score_spread":0.33410960793870226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610816547","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010662515,0.010262478,0.020676447,0.69220954,0.003904819,0.00004829212,0.000015172,0.00010181721,0.26211894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6384434,0.01178002,0.01335512,0.22292145,0.004262024,0.00036560465,0.000018748444,0.00017367436,0.10868005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97211784,0.01768581,0.0004013473,0.0017799075,0.006916721,0.0010984102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796877,0.013664346,0.00074159424,0.001287112,0.0024357645,0.0021835845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015536243,0.00047615194,0.0004953433,0.0011692947,0.009755773,0.015423334,0.0017057436,0.0070295436,0.0034042236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024621595,0.00045171438,0.0003765449,0.0005379135,0.058279093,0.008713451,0.008013953,0.010386589,0.0013067337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060293287,0.00001966711,0.00016811403,0.000039821625,0.0000017265554,0.000022401715,0.004945797,0.000069935806,0.00004959011,0.96476275,0.023200575,0.006713588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001791056,0.000036142632,0.00046579455,0.0002566525,0.000006112911,0.00009235799,0.0057662814,0.00029379202,0.00024408857,0.41513744,0.57765526,0.000028238062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012705698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019489894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015536243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005819935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015279907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082164526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611090212","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Open Court Principle in an Era of Online Publication: Questioning Presumptive Public Access to Parties' and Witnesses' Personal Information","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Law; Court of record; Political science; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Internet privacy; Personally identifiable information; Economic Justice; Business; Original jurisdiction; Computer science","score_opus":0.2750259198183424,"score_gpt":0.47237295946514796,"score_spread":0.19734703964680556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611090212","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034842648,0.011574341,0.11802355,0.5114585,0.0028274863,0.00016631004,0.00045325604,0.0002226183,0.3204313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8476947,0.008577847,0.031130498,0.07470377,0.010437332,0.00046103323,0.00020520206,0.00056091713,0.026228724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90647924,0.051379275,0.0046595335,0.011115204,0.02260179,0.003764857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5230735,0.40069178,0.01193552,0.04526713,0.015041646,0.003990416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09506678,0.0007138627,0.0018383642,0.002978507,0.011864766,0.039868116,0.0062318672,0.02781614,0.016873682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25174803,0.0015996805,0.0016636051,0.0037016845,0.08970415,0.10843944,0.019988682,0.034929045,0.0035806613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025964566,0.000017692453,0.0003338479,0.00006645617,0.000008155742,0.00022880599,0.0051208856,0.00013822125,0.000107476844,0.9810783,0.0038425287,0.009031766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002812279,0.00002078971,0.00028807347,0.00035659125,0.0000120905015,0.0002189663,0.0018097709,0.0005251286,0.0002644759,0.9519809,0.044453464,0.000041661362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004931221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032049625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09506678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007672182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011879483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5027672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611107020","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.v70i2.1638","title":"Duty to Publish","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Duty; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Business; Political science; Law; Advertising","score_opus":0.0421741435645667,"score_gpt":0.4130003054737329,"score_spread":0.3708261619091662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611107020","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018989802,0.0015210841,0.00004417022,0.0636343,0.92779976,0.00005131488,0.000052388492,0.000087880835,0.0067900927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006140929,0.0026366445,0.0002256441,0.16682194,0.7402598,0.00018820555,0.00017189737,0.00020599061,0.08887573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.961327,0.0046790806,0.0039641955,0.0030048143,0.023253111,0.00377174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84647876,0.024696544,0.008241971,0.007886076,0.07867535,0.034021325],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029347587,0.003156676,0.005494374,0.006788446,0.009828816,0.030572183,0.0060680183,0.038867053,0.10432597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1340835,0.0014412269,0.0038193474,0.002826931,0.006654272,0.008622539,0.00631373,0.03555594,0.122057416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008735809,0.000008269951,0.00001487178,0.000085796186,0.000005021804,0.000038789825,0.000012425848,0.0000032385317,0.000015792039,0.0003253999,0.9970517,0.00242985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033457552,0.000008844805,0.00008128778,0.00025304398,0.000010234862,0.00007048981,0.000077403296,0.000027257951,0.000024372035,0.00088236167,0.99851817,0.00001304383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005494233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016870677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9706524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008878419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025966763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34900516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611807142","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Law reform commissions: Canadian commissions and related bodies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law reform; Public administration","score_opus":0.05041458612205942,"score_gpt":0.35788573745989866,"score_spread":0.30747115133783925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611807142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010702153,0.014588307,0.00037962873,0.042033788,0.0016229338,0.00024331066,0.0065645967,0.0003417615,0.92352355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019780502,0.0028928306,0.00062342105,0.0018120973,0.00008673365,0.00007072192,0.0010242275,0.000082867504,0.9736266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982652,0.0001048523,0.000062368636,0.00012200894,0.000976911,0.0004686609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704033,0.00021195268,0.00007001713,0.00008564487,0.0022489089,0.0003431856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013812713,0.000715867,0.0004092133,0.0030021043,0.012252281,0.0076838396,0.0012508228,0.003876899,0.11488692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043904767,0.00055566,0.00035674253,0.006433083,0.0017579828,0.0026946112,0.0023534948,0.0035838136,0.0070913536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044563618,0.000048069556,0.0016730486,0.00018810177,0.0000066338102,0.00015348394,0.0012310167,0.00011976676,0.00010872717,0.08099301,0.858608,0.056825537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001219231,0.0000047408557,0.0046100486,0.00016632133,0.000005523879,0.00003368579,0.0016169272,0.00008359088,0.00019727145,0.0016729883,0.99157834,0.000018432906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96027815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9814061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11488692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062581465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16554953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4540624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612798282","doi":"10.7202/1038489ar","title":"Heroes, Tricksters, Monsters, and Caretakers: Indigenous Law and Legal Education","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Subject (documents); Political science; Sociology; Categorization; Epistemology; Library science","score_opus":0.023274437226089406,"score_gpt":0.3214301690673661,"score_spread":0.2981557318412767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612798282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5808972,0.006836529,0.0025050556,0.0606778,0.00027720662,0.00007777333,0.00002911653,0.000067185676,0.34863222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97581476,0.0020626043,0.0010380514,0.0018317039,0.00002072786,0.000013015166,0.0000082246415,0.000009293009,0.019201694],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980416,0.0006795224,0.00002483227,0.000098462435,0.00047538802,0.00068001763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878436,0.00040877514,0.00008816047,0.00003768213,0.0001501161,0.00053095055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021262174,0.00019192898,0.00016576512,0.00083392777,0.021456216,0.00490864,0.0009106571,0.001499046,0.0045271316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029015034,0.00018952703,0.00014832645,0.00073839055,0.016595684,0.0026281383,0.004051899,0.0026085863,0.00019728151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023391121,0.000158417,0.01151978,0.00021575327,0.000007585734,0.001135411,0.71086985,0.00023785247,0.000807307,0.17800792,0.013802433,0.08321443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010612952,0.000073443036,0.029193738,0.0006091241,0.00002501644,0.0005079176,0.69053525,0.00051414996,0.0008058147,0.014897107,0.2627813,0.00004647361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8607326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9680646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8607326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030672641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043279503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2801751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613835221","doi":"","title":"A Diverse Law Firm: The Professionalism Imperative for 2017 - Why Law Firms in Ontario Will Quickly Have to Reflect the Diversity of the Province","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Diversity (politics); Law; Legal profession; Business; Commercial law; Political science; Practice of law","score_opus":0.06956283385131529,"score_gpt":0.3909664772793924,"score_spread":0.3214036434280771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613835221","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08688379,0.0019320918,0.0017178563,0.7666043,0.00076226064,0.00010051904,0.00017779176,0.00006771054,0.14175369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8568089,0.0014015533,0.0022336424,0.060221683,0.0002507103,0.000055236596,0.00012406408,0.000051558247,0.07885272],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900129,0.001721644,0.00018638022,0.00068583275,0.0031851784,0.0042081173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96008813,0.0018229453,0.0011529679,0.0007820865,0.0066467146,0.029507117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005880514,0.00016324867,0.00030572937,0.0006007422,0.0314048,0.011334559,0.0014644301,0.0047971127,0.011156637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011780107,0.00033336077,0.00030830927,0.0010328621,0.015061603,0.004145332,0.0059614214,0.0049573383,0.0018314848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013559783,0.00022503859,0.054978456,0.00033051855,0.000033248478,0.0020592392,0.116041675,0.00038648053,0.0037572144,0.27284056,0.42178753,0.12742452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004208113,0.000081237755,0.06108894,0.00047238654,0.000017208444,0.0004342904,0.12423689,0.0003872614,0.00049120403,0.033341467,0.7793339,0.00007322629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90378404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9786129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09621596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08907124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25523758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6462601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615920300","doi":"10.1177/2322005817700185","title":"The Gordian Knot: Regulatory Relationship and Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Institution; Government (linguistics); Position (finance); Engineering ethics; Public relations; Law; Public administration; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.027258427281577166,"score_gpt":0.39348029145897784,"score_spread":0.36622186417740066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615920300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0461296,0.01723613,0.059123304,0.31491107,0.0027439746,0.00013633029,0.0001186269,0.00023900073,0.5593619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9252487,0.005720304,0.008596526,0.015313511,0.0006650788,0.00011688164,0.000042108302,0.000104622144,0.044192214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893182,0.006359105,0.00025550995,0.0012631258,0.0017760542,0.0010280705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885821,0.0071172128,0.0013145603,0.0006643436,0.0014180986,0.0009037046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009405306,0.00039026927,0.00045128248,0.0024833537,0.008210964,0.013950338,0.0013911481,0.0060680443,0.014272927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019248193,0.00036273443,0.0004246174,0.0020623647,0.040500026,0.014656133,0.00898438,0.008324733,0.0012528051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008497375,0.0000103906295,0.00042018868,0.00003245807,0.0000024442022,0.000063748485,0.0049707238,0.000118073694,0.000030458983,0.98250556,0.0039781774,0.007859248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022820905,0.000060761566,0.0022725768,0.00049464375,0.000014810994,0.00024530574,0.012710799,0.0012219746,0.00023782923,0.7233626,0.25929096,0.00006486239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012848244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008445994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014272927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009995888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010619073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07252562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616118064","doi":"10.3138/jcs.41.3.185","title":"Ethical Imagination or Ethical Reasoning?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11955420037067496,"score_gpt":0.4975750312857974,"score_spread":0.3780208309151224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616118064","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014763798,0.24249688,0.0044367155,0.54704136,0.008417158,0.000029124909,0.00003216365,0.00004911003,0.19602112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39166546,0.20244515,0.0088528255,0.18306862,0.019868564,0.00025716695,0.00014024893,0.00032953033,0.1933724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890617,0.007618675,0.00024051816,0.0006109136,0.0015774989,0.0008907676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880618,0.007935915,0.00089565705,0.0007953724,0.0012681173,0.0010431802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0098332865,0.0008857032,0.00093920936,0.0014988967,0.0047793733,0.015829507,0.0019064359,0.006924233,0.010003275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018927371,0.0005588335,0.00055076805,0.0015691208,0.06220392,0.021990713,0.005917761,0.012218434,0.0028924057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015211895,0.000017158674,0.000079704325,0.00017823534,0.00000569327,0.000084843836,0.0073703066,0.00007409568,0.000039421557,0.85700494,0.11966863,0.015461774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009979897,0.000009500298,0.00016540579,0.0011711054,0.0000031806994,0.00012530718,0.0088251885,0.00009282973,0.000049267845,0.60691184,0.38262248,0.000013871212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071358397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007737588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99286413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00924374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010775288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06706834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616666987","doi":"","title":"Born in Faith, Continued in Determination: B.A. (Rocky) Jones and the Egalitarian Practice of Law in: In Search of the Ethical Lawyer: Stories from the Canadian Legal Profession","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Faith; Legal ethics; Political science; Practice of law; Legal profession; Sociology; Bad faith; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.036594047825462044,"score_gpt":0.39395181909480415,"score_spread":0.3573577712693421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616666987","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011522538,0.018221725,0.00043797208,0.91748506,0.003850723,0.00002762334,0.00003439866,0.00003881535,0.048381098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3390034,0.023688616,0.0010032711,0.32697245,0.0018733601,0.000073172785,0.000032509295,0.00022771646,0.30712548],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966575,0.0011532911,0.000040520612,0.00023865078,0.0010731079,0.0008369792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99341255,0.0019137516,0.0002659072,0.00009013528,0.0015311815,0.002786426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003532222,0.00050638267,0.00041010874,0.0007928904,0.046003293,0.010869529,0.001497247,0.0055036414,0.009254179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008975163,0.00038529353,0.0002860956,0.0008733714,0.023280472,0.005390002,0.003620359,0.0144746825,0.0014599924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026729735,0.000041324005,0.001753426,0.00009739602,0.000010636025,0.0006068501,0.15503268,0.000053856897,0.0002646602,0.040711142,0.7745712,0.026830167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066291814,0.000014476633,0.0016689459,0.00023898148,0.000007209323,0.00023059858,0.17849292,0.000038066388,0.000114607166,0.004768129,0.8143842,0.0000351927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8128836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9439531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18711638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025729332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05185675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37643665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617066494","doi":"10.3968/9482","title":"An Information Analysis of Judges’ Repetitive Discourse in Criminal Courtroom","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Retributive justice; Law; Realization (probability); Sociology; Criminal justice; Political science","score_opus":0.0395951492051804,"score_gpt":0.4363272877344943,"score_spread":0.3967321385293139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617066494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86431414,0.0013206523,0.048973706,0.0017683726,0.00007486223,0.0001376562,0.00034743923,0.00010631668,0.08295681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99467814,0.00012849386,0.003751399,0.00004570941,0.000023912418,0.000026481812,0.000102962666,0.0000129257905,0.0012299658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99291694,0.0036493244,0.00040115725,0.0005331867,0.0020134407,0.00048604625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969344,0.024687171,0.0017867932,0.0012261714,0.0025983932,0.00035742047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055436175,0.00025596542,0.00036954065,0.0073685977,0.003267973,0.005511367,0.0007142462,0.0010735666,0.0022668422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026542855,0.00026079913,0.0004150896,0.00590719,0.006198577,0.005971481,0.0025556157,0.0013432301,0.00019425797],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043688566,0.000103491286,0.015683478,0.00031622185,0.000034473633,0.0012168093,0.3612842,0.0015911883,0.0064393734,0.5252598,0.0019975759,0.08563653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089808986,0.00033376378,0.1105695,0.00094191247,0.00023370433,0.0012918102,0.34598163,0.037232336,0.01523517,0.3723575,0.11542048,0.0003124187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008345946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053615896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008345946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004300666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002811082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031203687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618196792","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5006","title":"COLD, HARD JUSTICE LESSONS FROM THE FLEET: INNOVATING FROM THE BOTTOM UP","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incubator; Popularity; Economic Justice; Legal service; Mentorship; Service (business); Legal research; Legal profession; Entrepreneurship; Legal practice; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law; Sociology; Marketing","score_opus":0.17588333222656177,"score_gpt":0.448297613723316,"score_spread":0.27241428149675423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618196792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19792818,0.011683877,0.028023114,0.23870744,0.0023933058,0.00035675388,0.0001073431,0.0005623741,0.52023757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.741873,0.014254831,0.036535777,0.03149283,0.000372665,0.0001856667,0.00013718329,0.00042674417,0.17472126],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996606,0.0013822264,0.000060197235,0.0002520753,0.000804056,0.00089536246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957546,0.0010227074,0.00017313563,0.00026678588,0.00041842664,0.0023642692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004349944,0.00034775204,0.00026455775,0.0010257786,0.009593528,0.011396528,0.0015661983,0.0028124764,0.012442602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00713332,0.00027495937,0.00039981387,0.0007479535,0.012566966,0.011096471,0.011869194,0.0050131734,0.002756331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046744342,0.00051723927,0.008028989,0.00048328054,0.000023190432,0.001550023,0.17848906,0.0006320008,0.0022027504,0.18725261,0.13446683,0.48630732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001283916,0.00021286451,0.0046217367,0.00095486233,0.00001436002,0.0004275712,0.1291558,0.00041131908,0.0006729501,0.04546889,0.81800234,0.000044486904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027157973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13387579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027157973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007680507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02672634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05572623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618835669","doi":"","title":"Who Speaks for Parliament?: Hansard, the Courts and Legislative Intent","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Political science; Legislative intent; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09605725028713857,"score_gpt":0.40956364689219527,"score_spread":0.3135063966050567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618835669","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019028582,0.66910183,0.0019998665,0.20636676,0.0022629474,0.00003630118,0.000050211136,0.000028519546,0.10112499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60624045,0.33300808,0.0022595034,0.03593821,0.0018075319,0.00005020625,0.00006095076,0.000046452147,0.02058861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98590183,0.008309959,0.00045905626,0.00064714346,0.0033592882,0.0013226924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99006677,0.0063040196,0.0007979735,0.0002033514,0.002023221,0.0006046828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015358958,0.00038581173,0.0007419756,0.004257072,0.005379292,0.008677762,0.0016339833,0.0031904685,0.0025563003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024009958,0.00026416554,0.0003311757,0.0048180358,0.020920284,0.005627759,0.002325324,0.0041755848,0.00042792526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003662525,0.000023361561,0.0014343723,0.0018650844,0.000033740827,0.00024777406,0.041362766,0.00012263005,0.00038444536,0.80661184,0.03248088,0.115396485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003401224,0.00003828529,0.011156923,0.008913187,0.00011862271,0.0002921038,0.04198139,0.00015978393,0.00056386477,0.08115709,0.855505,0.000079662765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.645993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.754394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9687634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03123658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062178794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7121836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619075263","doi":"","title":"Public-Centred Civil Justice Redesign: A Case Study of the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Status quo; Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Political science; Law; Civil litigation; Alternative dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Resolution (logic); Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07907835763609462,"score_gpt":0.3463088283110282,"score_spread":0.2672304706749336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619075263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87006694,0.0008835758,0.00433011,0.015743265,0.00020510169,0.00053414603,0.00012619738,0.00008627633,0.10802435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687015,0.00047251608,0.0025685672,0.0020208047,0.00003195815,0.00020249051,0.000057697136,0.00006625522,0.025878081],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98268026,0.0102096265,0.00027472875,0.00076368067,0.0024206594,0.003651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839617,0.008123287,0.0008973005,0.001054206,0.002489413,0.003474109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074308976,0.0005896757,0.00080610166,0.002297232,0.049493484,0.011096277,0.0048426418,0.008294536,0.009806737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025017254,0.00074323703,0.00039776953,0.004881158,0.0144767575,0.0036024714,0.008098505,0.009391653,0.0009958977],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014533021,0.001680158,0.020591754,0.00041014247,0.000042564687,0.028258067,0.74394953,0.003067311,0.0014355181,0.094759904,0.03566557,0.06999423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004523626,0.00016144912,0.012348002,0.00024262378,0.000021073176,0.0014976312,0.86138904,0.0023113734,0.0004479966,0.004154047,0.11730514,0.000076303324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70755225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8957631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29244775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046613872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038827933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58834004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620467785","doi":"","title":"Undercompensating for Discrimination: An Empirical Study of General Damages Awards Issued by the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, 2000-2015","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Tribunal; Human rights; Law; Political science; Commission; Legislature; Business","score_opus":0.14797218726227307,"score_gpt":0.4972913191124273,"score_spread":0.34931913185015423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620467785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99105996,0.00027749402,0.00013132338,0.0008208988,0.0000117173795,0.00005973376,0.0013553399,0.0000074153395,0.006276152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943199,0.00023020458,0.00010819869,0.00014784424,0.000012196417,0.000024451772,0.00085044047,0.000004146054,0.0043024947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946748,0.00045281174,0.00046150584,0.00038340644,0.002984119,0.0010433304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9577585,0.0071839793,0.023074172,0.00088945165,0.008044992,0.0030488844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035421082,0.00017131277,0.00036734817,0.002643817,0.0025424277,0.0021889075,0.0012155361,0.00071353413,0.0028072924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02113692,0.0003202305,0.0004104107,0.006098056,0.0017785685,0.0012072265,0.0011750014,0.0010061638,0.00038396177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000836339,0.00009980234,0.9795885,0.000065316155,0.00007579395,0.00015649895,0.006752565,0.00024028645,0.0001992571,0.00058626506,0.0028355615,0.009316447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023018463,0.000024363162,0.9937807,0.000013475007,0.00000761343,0.00001961846,0.004063797,0.000096638854,0.000036406782,0.00002806992,0.0019199011,0.0000071984064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8767672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9544555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12323278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02232869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015335899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.247917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620857392","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1260","title":"Networking the Rule of Law: The Canadian Bar Association’s Abandoned Intervention in Chevron v Yaiguaje","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Intervention (counseling); Legislature; Corporate governance; Corporation; Politics; Supreme court; Sociology; Multinational corporation; Legal profession; Public administration; Management","score_opus":0.05769061674622808,"score_gpt":0.40998201729470296,"score_spread":0.35229140054847485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620857392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45237374,0.004331483,0.0034137333,0.2136588,0.0010466047,0.00019964116,0.00012489007,0.00013416918,0.3247169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95616394,0.00053267705,0.00047518726,0.017787604,0.00008275207,0.000037108042,0.000024552055,0.000042644875,0.024853516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98400104,0.0024150067,0.00015509588,0.0017867018,0.004227897,0.007414224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992611,0.0029277513,0.00044953273,0.0002954505,0.0015652347,0.0021510434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069768587,0.00045174407,0.000553783,0.0016067214,0.07977696,0.016203115,0.0044636843,0.01444699,0.0049590063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018356046,0.0008357454,0.0005151395,0.001859508,0.031297702,0.004071717,0.007225899,0.014519516,0.00030134348],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011870594,0.0001315013,0.010979751,0.000103289225,0.00005596544,0.0050454335,0.2338732,0.0012559106,0.0015132858,0.6393845,0.06819819,0.03934027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114694,0.00011608005,0.023354761,0.00038712675,0.00015136618,0.0007719635,0.23011616,0.0020397296,0.0018759706,0.040419634,0.7003092,0.0003433456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98635453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15833652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15833652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18032321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97621036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621352715","doi":"10.7202/1071144ar","title":"Respect for Law: An Educational Objective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Political science","score_opus":0.13089409660850543,"score_gpt":0.45420533668860436,"score_spread":0.3233112400800989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621352715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09112292,0.013666612,0.0146587305,0.26781702,0.0017719654,0.0003161745,0.00021207346,0.00015135191,0.61028314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9305901,0.007901257,0.008588385,0.027366458,0.00076468964,0.00023101836,0.00015851772,0.000028979439,0.02437066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937801,0.002879942,0.00026397326,0.00034981684,0.0018071189,0.00091911235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879844,0.0047659026,0.0018848684,0.0005605613,0.0014898077,0.0033145158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007677847,0.00022056786,0.00033934967,0.0013309593,0.0025239883,0.0039904336,0.0007753023,0.002401268,0.0075401478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01254798,0.00013591886,0.00022832918,0.001160377,0.008231055,0.004344052,0.006263776,0.005038324,0.0006466019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002242406,0.0007005702,0.015465616,0.0007208034,0.000012338415,0.00016748309,0.012177626,0.00021832353,0.00038268842,0.57100165,0.052736804,0.34639364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004379439,0.00046904318,0.069000565,0.0048866565,0.000040145314,0.0005772913,0.024128709,0.00038022184,0.0013091952,0.2191731,0.6799382,0.000053070413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024898495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010169591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007677847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003058629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014742245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04060483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622210974","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0022","title":"Access to Civil Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Commission; Political science; Empirical research; Data collection; Empowerment; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.07082181452919714,"score_gpt":0.3445448084818621,"score_spread":0.273722993952665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622210974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048703165,0.007840053,0.0032850914,0.015603373,0.0004583784,0.000042834963,0.00013222666,0.000048058373,0.9677196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45987356,0.029317303,0.005141431,0.013635934,0.0016829944,0.0003515005,0.0005660633,0.00017444658,0.48925674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941744,0.0017974867,0.00021582445,0.0006500313,0.0021120412,0.0010502001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961498,0.0018256056,0.00029668515,0.0005706525,0.00060296257,0.00055436115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026981067,0.00038249366,0.00048112913,0.0024540946,0.0053202184,0.008630381,0.0010321642,0.0032620057,0.042636063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011404928,0.00023698545,0.0003212702,0.0025522606,0.013689195,0.008614798,0.009166573,0.0042317845,0.006630938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003622245,0.000018875275,0.0003522463,0.00005987678,0.0000020155042,0.00008236859,0.0055181785,0.00007199193,0.000051501756,0.92927396,0.019065095,0.045500226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027382878,0.000020689708,0.0012441031,0.00067769043,0.0000034524699,0.00025347178,0.005686611,0.00010121776,0.00017056562,0.22996615,0.7618586,0.000014699265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063028857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009138275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042636063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046061995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068252445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14263183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623314048","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v2i1.7159","title":"Teaching an Invisible Subject: How are we Educating Faculty about Copyright?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Copyright law; Public relations; Subject (documents); Political science; Higher education; Copyright Act; Action (physics); Intellectual property; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09987179628539973,"score_gpt":0.42056405526098806,"score_spread":0.32069225897558834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623314048","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1229215,0.01193646,0.004038194,0.82017446,0.002582423,0.00015760664,0.000059793416,0.00023189135,0.037897743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.909035,0.011683481,0.0043723583,0.06080912,0.0011428442,0.00018980709,0.000060273265,0.00013927273,0.01256787],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.961828,0.021146253,0.0009190144,0.0018104191,0.0071513997,0.007144958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86115354,0.054241817,0.012028199,0.006068084,0.021382373,0.04512602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047091953,0.0004262485,0.0008254404,0.0029624652,0.028122516,0.037381414,0.0033523522,0.008017935,0.01019535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15984496,0.00053020014,0.00067625975,0.003566606,0.031504415,0.03414866,0.014062504,0.010724654,0.0019227766],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008770561,0.00068188953,0.04217138,0.0009175376,0.00005829718,0.00040321518,0.47964668,0.00017525704,0.0007127529,0.03898395,0.08838673,0.34777462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045135443,0.00026727648,0.01891406,0.0028308048,0.000091495596,0.00023921841,0.64389324,0.00027043247,0.0010564369,0.031648528,0.30060947,0.00013395539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06047758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093281925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06047758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028017212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0779212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24904901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623779531","doi":"10.26443/fo.v13i.250","title":"“The inconvenience of the present arrangement can only be realized by those who have to work under it”: a History of the Legal Research Collections at McGill","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fontanus","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endowment; Humanities; Library science; Classics; Political science; Art; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.11651159701679221,"score_gpt":0.3959705684239121,"score_spread":0.2794589714071199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623779531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04866412,0.12112915,0.0025086289,0.17229398,0.0031635724,0.0002599684,0.0009928744,0.00022617378,0.65076154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44931126,0.043683413,0.0021114491,0.03001378,0.0026125298,0.0003833611,0.00024441112,0.0004694553,0.4711703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896131,0.0043026325,0.00023078524,0.0008822187,0.0025425763,0.0024286204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99052936,0.0040402897,0.0009555196,0.00090843684,0.001432959,0.0021334703],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009335129,0.00053363614,0.00043906545,0.004720535,0.03959129,0.018926512,0.0040870546,0.004944935,0.022793457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01172297,0.0011367293,0.00033693833,0.00745163,0.044505205,0.01220558,0.008652333,0.0058822925,0.002926458],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008241634,0.000055319524,0.0015441043,0.0003960814,0.000012562455,0.0007899667,0.13378657,0.0000755661,0.0006736853,0.59315246,0.22017804,0.0492533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044172766,0.00002051512,0.0043040696,0.0003311364,0.0000041151125,0.00006854644,0.0109496275,0.000021560436,0.00027153286,0.0028508878,0.98113006,0.000043419324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5100813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7491548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9810735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07309148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057530418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98560786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625883803","doi":"","title":"The Wellness Doctrines for Law Students & Young Lawyers, by Jerome Doraisamy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.042555688381149016,"score_gpt":0.42697456658463145,"score_spread":0.3844188782034824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625883803","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032466268,0.02626923,0.0008109882,0.91392595,0.0054416214,0.000013242788,0.00002931486,0.000010668658,0.05025231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36076784,0.050703652,0.0031061238,0.3314873,0.019332813,0.00019372013,0.00007285645,0.00013617116,0.23419957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983026,0.0006764706,0.000102750964,0.00024628497,0.0003986269,0.00027325994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931179,0.0041994564,0.0002990799,0.00026690547,0.0010888698,0.0010277828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063492646,0.0004075265,0.0004702348,0.0007193838,0.006512409,0.005812625,0.0009951295,0.0075224875,0.004133831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017126678,0.00052768335,0.00032446926,0.00046894542,0.01982552,0.011295538,0.0038901465,0.017438553,0.00092141476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019773543,0.00004994933,0.00049302925,0.00002594077,0.000004101835,0.000076524324,0.003208241,0.0000776251,0.00007166678,0.6485067,0.3329275,0.014538942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001969628,0.00001874286,0.001636363,0.00031556343,0.0000069502194,0.00010267591,0.0057717934,0.00014981345,0.00011511072,0.3211819,0.6706543,0.000027075232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017944349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042954963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017944349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00395336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008491881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035679758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626386906","doi":"","title":"I seek your wise and learned counsel, please, How I might best adapt my modest plays Unto conventions of the modern day: Or Shakespeare Goes to High School","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ScholarWorks - GVSU (Grand Valley State University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science; Law; Public relations","score_opus":0.0930340592026884,"score_gpt":0.3171866610295221,"score_spread":0.2241526018268337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626386906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026957747,0.0067349775,0.012487452,0.2791373,0.025401074,0.00018879057,0.0004179606,0.0016351377,0.64703965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1651207,0.0041642026,0.007702435,0.039537363,0.0038027046,0.00015222789,0.00026438778,0.0016315877,0.7776243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875915,0.00057144254,0.00003194138,0.00017238913,0.00023059877,0.00023452636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793696,0.00034826764,0.00013809113,0.00020660186,0.00042055352,0.0009495496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017231806,0.00073233515,0.00035507808,0.00065873103,0.010399586,0.011638872,0.001023943,0.0026119617,0.04844597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070741307,0.00034101127,0.0003573939,0.0005252791,0.007547784,0.007795327,0.004897951,0.005751149,0.03556201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039002585,0.000058777907,0.0014752237,0.00012417606,0.000013053134,0.0005070359,0.05064694,0.000066187575,0.0010304159,0.038939603,0.8614758,0.04562369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003635569,0.00001537392,0.0004733941,0.00013469234,0.0000028427912,0.00020752815,0.020873379,0.000043099917,0.00014924945,0.0018304089,0.9762457,0.000020673888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0118644135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03431005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04844597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022864148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001809056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16206789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263027130","doi":"","title":"Court Government and the Collapse of Accountability in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Kingdom; History; Law; Geology; Paleontology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03785020954608008,"score_gpt":0.32078328669118633,"score_spread":0.28293307714510624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W263027130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4575187,0.018950852,0.00051452906,0.3498848,0.0013127293,0.000060022223,0.00050982827,0.000060727547,0.1711878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973417,0.0019687458,0.00012117638,0.010678542,0.00012915998,0.00001173347,0.000050999573,0.000034625195,0.013587985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97437626,0.003220631,0.0005993875,0.0010659641,0.005548993,0.015188793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95993346,0.010271441,0.0037569131,0.0009239017,0.013809923,0.011304373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008106178,0.0002736387,0.0011047559,0.0037266698,0.03933688,0.020066114,0.0030426567,0.0104464665,0.008701927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03990778,0.00072946266,0.000782303,0.0075157825,0.021357777,0.004307485,0.006505261,0.0131025575,0.0003378878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041176286,0.0001566654,0.041983306,0.00026810536,0.00014834777,0.0024581917,0.08607838,0.0025955483,0.0004210532,0.71357685,0.110863455,0.041038275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020318448,0.0000927234,0.2467303,0.0014111169,0.00023028956,0.00050834985,0.15821813,0.002407266,0.0008386913,0.05359172,0.5350685,0.00069973746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71750987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28249013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3268258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83220977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26321446","doi":"10.1016/j.rcl.2015.05.006","title":"In Canada: Litigating Literacy.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phi Delta Kappan","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Redress; Law; Framing (construction); Harm; Economics; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0318516915063755,"score_gpt":0.36395102854878225,"score_spread":0.33209933704240674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26321446","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14123876,0.009179273,0.0006237742,0.47921014,0.0026906948,0.0002686934,0.0020910415,0.00016829163,0.3645293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6364107,0.004910016,0.0008613555,0.12850557,0.00044684744,0.0001257909,0.00073782087,0.00007178499,0.22793007],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628603,0.0003575122,0.000108644366,0.00016651172,0.0011636243,0.0019175464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99319625,0.0006477054,0.00040715907,0.0001080693,0.0020703804,0.0035703965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014957928,0.00022653305,0.0002528341,0.0009677675,0.014495955,0.0039700745,0.0014593599,0.004272537,0.030630777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099737905,0.00023823508,0.0003436125,0.001161593,0.0031875581,0.0011729829,0.0034106744,0.004524807,0.0019434135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005651484,0.00021247889,0.12548178,0.00021755266,0.000020434733,0.0066653504,0.022725461,0.00015109839,0.00038277308,0.058925495,0.62751865,0.15764235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045358254,0.00007327648,0.13032943,0.0007054815,0.000033370747,0.003388385,0.04760545,0.0005268626,0.0003893558,0.006066399,0.8107613,0.00007535218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9660177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98464286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047481373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047481373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15111956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3445031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26957196","doi":"10.2174/1570162x14999160224100541","title":"MOOCs as Online Professional Development for Law Librarians","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current HIV Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Professional development; Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Law; Sociology; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.37331437437357035,"score_gpt":0.5784939364740658,"score_spread":0.20517956210049543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26957196","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08818169,0.4677768,0.027400276,0.020522885,0.005753343,0.0010773367,0.00059597346,0.0022250777,0.38646656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31940627,0.4217635,0.071743794,0.01192847,0.0050888113,0.0013774309,0.00096369395,0.00053161796,0.16719644],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892884,0.00047148153,0.000040507784,0.00009591552,0.000366801,0.00009642785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966,0.0018557449,0.0003429509,0.00018308088,0.0003529269,0.00066526054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012396377,0.0002827613,0.00034876665,0.0018870152,0.0009290901,0.0037492479,0.00071320886,0.0008380001,0.020185586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037661397,0.00010716976,0.0003517656,0.0019452289,0.0006744553,0.002363397,0.0020910634,0.0009271367,0.005013782],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049496462,0.0003444408,0.0010382237,0.001978895,0.000015897227,0.000074029966,0.0005794467,0.00007505441,0.0006062967,0.005237699,0.020485215,0.9695154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042338983,0.00021895749,0.008166238,0.004186594,0.000045846245,0.0004566283,0.0015442057,0.00028602793,0.0017784939,0.007341569,0.97590953,0.000023624212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011309518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034663163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020185586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009443172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020960446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06752753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W269690993","doi":"","title":"C.A.J. Coady, ed. , What's Wrong with Moralism? . Reviewed by","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Morality; Epistemology","score_opus":0.049515981419668335,"score_gpt":0.3616134247474528,"score_spread":0.31209744332778444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W269690993","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007508243,0.97815657,0.0001278248,0.012204506,0.005744757,0.0000025901352,0.000027008264,0.000012716925,0.003649052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013805161,0.98734426,0.00014010495,0.0021041525,0.0040095793,0.0000055712553,0.000043376793,0.000012370205,0.004960182],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991258,0.00025981714,0.000095721596,0.000115360475,0.0003439929,0.000059337814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947583,0.002792887,0.00040657044,0.000085743035,0.00156569,0.00039079326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017959721,0.0017465076,0.0013929384,0.0046725655,0.0015136695,0.0027862818,0.0016456523,0.0031539057,0.018281588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00586292,0.0008038618,0.000590825,0.004150284,0.0024673282,0.0047681755,0.001457696,0.004646808,0.011062849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021442944,0.000009689049,0.0002710902,0.0019479517,0.000020710304,0.00010544525,0.0003064662,0.00011001273,0.00004176779,0.0030575315,0.7937944,0.2003134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011178538,0.00001584454,0.0018594359,0.008279127,0.000029846558,0.0014104777,0.0008460013,0.00014459048,0.000085465304,0.0043838373,0.9829047,0.000029465966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01397993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0278767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018281588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017300788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035308008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2725360110","doi":"","title":"Library Guides. Canadian Law Resources. Case law.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.03430925794777162,"score_gpt":0.3272411730694733,"score_spread":0.2929319151217017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2725360110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035828777,0.005368677,0.0009457981,0.011631858,0.00090167165,0.00033849274,0.059088573,0.0025113227,0.9188553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033756965,0.010692988,0.0031376942,0.004085972,0.00023891534,0.0002560434,0.02674994,0.0010813045,0.9503814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970577,0.00015572294,0.00019199293,0.00013711464,0.002078524,0.0003790123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841606,0.0026020296,0.00040363465,0.0006148915,0.010778341,0.0014405804],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019466404,0.0014194613,0.00095110596,0.015663628,0.007250168,0.0065637273,0.0035294676,0.004554628,0.58451986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013553049,0.0012876132,0.0006621163,0.026862625,0.0023659023,0.0045069335,0.0023224808,0.0027376215,0.30067822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023827943,0.000006011852,0.000050436905,0.000077860204,4.892509e-7,0.000018614428,0.000049862563,0.000013485887,0.000010422437,0.0016426081,0.97919524,0.018932642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032746766,0.0000013131719,0.00059575244,0.00016680826,0.0000012513572,0.000020761632,0.00016234496,0.000025145258,0.000024940535,0.0007569412,0.9982326,0.0000088636025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91693026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9662089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58451986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024630602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08169047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59263194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2726742724","doi":"","title":"2003. 03. 032. Армстронг Х. Социальные связи и приватизация в канадском здравоохранении. Armstrong H. social cohision and provatization in Canadian health-care // Canadian J. of law and society. Calgary, 2001. Vol. 16, №9. P. 6581","year":2003,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 4, Государство и право: Реферативный журнал","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology; Social care; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.02363849231292917,"score_gpt":0.3308705982860243,"score_spread":0.3072321059730951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2726742724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015423942,0.010353615,0.0016953519,0.02398891,0.003829939,0.00017810616,0.015149508,0.003084356,0.94017786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00895774,0.0037850416,0.0009981019,0.00230328,0.0008537494,0.00014059573,0.003874195,0.00059233536,0.97849506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994802,0.000042910913,0.000037044687,0.00006677418,0.00023947645,0.00013361605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998393,0.00028621202,0.00015112809,0.00011404244,0.0005724358,0.0004830945],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097062637,0.0011346494,0.00088643015,0.0016131826,0.0017419544,0.0049224873,0.0018389034,0.0057448843,0.86798793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031084733,0.0007163477,0.0006115102,0.0015300164,0.0010011924,0.0025687194,0.0014129942,0.0027156684,0.764696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031003018,0.00010446808,0.00049091195,0.00026977705,0.000016033891,0.00023640743,0.00014853544,0.000047828882,0.00029644812,0.0066768965,0.81184363,0.17955908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013593816,0.00007552257,0.0036514795,0.00045522535,0.000027554794,0.00059581624,0.00023730748,0.00016263493,0.0003229709,0.005230213,0.9890799,0.00002535399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013962354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017192904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9860377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00182319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028146717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18829918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727110256","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law and Legal Research: General Info","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal research; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.12877513848222008,"score_gpt":0.4400756177954088,"score_spread":0.3113004793131887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727110256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005177044,0.002534677,0.00070209056,0.0060432777,0.0009228736,0.0004613574,0.060262673,0.001991349,0.926564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013005671,0.002213481,0.0012771146,0.00080197473,0.000078116005,0.00016711935,0.010667005,0.0005499723,0.98294467],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651766,0.00019784388,0.0002109547,0.0001723602,0.0024341145,0.0004670062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97565424,0.0030943789,0.00039066677,0.000969985,0.018072546,0.0018182104],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003141226,0.0016232413,0.0014946474,0.013698675,0.008079322,0.0106831435,0.0032320896,0.0046751034,0.5664456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01792697,0.0018965707,0.0009782051,0.02669762,0.002387367,0.004663983,0.0021114785,0.0026007858,0.2507896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004390817,0.000008176438,0.00006137916,0.00010311703,7.1137276e-7,0.000007112171,0.000055992317,0.000033310862,0.000015651112,0.0016134925,0.98599756,0.012099152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068662675,0.0000029420664,0.001458209,0.00020658334,0.0000041956,0.000011653089,0.00023953826,0.000068727306,0.00007427524,0.00070300157,0.9972053,0.000018618282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95043516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9844297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5664456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048115667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15530863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61841273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W273031924","doi":"","title":"Sticky Floors, Broken Steps, and Concrete Ceilings in Legal Careers","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas journal of women and the law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Glass ceiling; Legal profession; Quarter (Canadian coin); Practice of law; Law; Hierarchy; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.013817900444641791,"score_gpt":0.30054966195580474,"score_spread":0.2867317615111629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W273031924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62163645,0.1477963,0.0007393235,0.08064211,0.0015336892,0.000099943165,0.0016481057,0.000029179664,0.14587486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93803483,0.041297704,0.00060150865,0.002883722,0.0015418371,0.00007283522,0.0004311364,0.000020845999,0.015115654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983621,0.0007044415,0.00007008087,0.00019444198,0.00037380154,0.000295092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866173,0.0064752484,0.0031855272,0.00017790603,0.0007820125,0.002761919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020237176,0.00028002457,0.00025232838,0.0025337755,0.0026211964,0.0033284714,0.0015474298,0.0020528848,0.036449995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007626405,0.00034100786,0.00040290153,0.0035536992,0.0045626233,0.0025126846,0.0023629507,0.0028925089,0.001311736],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019970916,0.0006996445,0.6242258,0.0012498678,0.0000387011,0.00070267625,0.033530086,0.0005433418,0.00016948125,0.099516325,0.06899575,0.17012866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002307527,0.00024940836,0.79789346,0.005557938,0.000046435187,0.0008242027,0.07604463,0.0004984603,0.000077668024,0.023106769,0.09562376,0.000054261112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051138807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06267528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051138807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025011387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036882472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121937394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731985030","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199684250.013.009","title":"The Legal Profession and the Market for Lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Debt; Legal education; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Quality (philosophy); Great recession; Recession; Commercial law; Practice of law; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Business; Economics; Labour economics; Finance","score_opus":0.036221311106966754,"score_gpt":0.3172114438710916,"score_spread":0.2809901327641249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731985030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01419301,0.02505691,0.0007972425,0.07141823,0.0006259448,0.000025225865,0.000031265172,0.000031990858,0.88782024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30123976,0.030801851,0.0009931261,0.0148840975,0.0022182388,0.00007702035,0.00007188417,0.000060422663,0.6496536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989693,0.00024140139,0.000018445302,0.00009591832,0.00036156326,0.00031340643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989215,0.00057329505,0.000093067625,0.00003202246,0.00010105083,0.0002789672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007467798,0.00015768806,0.0002513485,0.0010656092,0.004415273,0.008320983,0.000501385,0.0027827597,0.04786619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021190029,0.00017345812,0.00017052838,0.0017871504,0.0066102087,0.0054663755,0.0031021247,0.0033921006,0.0048608487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005780603,0.00006547499,0.00032288846,0.00004962261,7.9062613e-7,0.00010063881,0.0033619113,0.00008063283,0.0001404045,0.9126022,0.042893015,0.040376674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011162358,0.000024199682,0.0015762923,0.0003232607,0.0000013771051,0.000098321485,0.006404709,0.00022345016,0.00006163579,0.15426402,0.8370038,0.000007853408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007561552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016860485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04786619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006424787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0090827495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16012836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733268477","doi":"","title":"Let Law Be Law, and Let Us Critique: Teaching Law to Undergraduate Students of Criminal Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Legal education; Legal profession; Public law; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04019897328820871,"score_gpt":0.439396451223421,"score_spread":0.3991974779352123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733268477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4898622,0.018488685,0.010389427,0.1631624,0.0035750528,0.0007698404,0.000066862405,0.00044071028,0.31324482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89675003,0.008105371,0.006353993,0.019697582,0.00029728338,0.00020363435,0.00005378439,0.000066578796,0.06847174],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998319,0.00061373005,0.00003589984,0.00013918061,0.00049057126,0.00040157844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744934,0.0005502914,0.0001543423,0.000063094645,0.0005696982,0.0012132496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018476527,0.00039335148,0.00026372215,0.000572072,0.009255473,0.006375437,0.0011591043,0.0022950156,0.0024172198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057316106,0.00024404892,0.00017830174,0.0004899484,0.007676346,0.0025295587,0.0026534004,0.003141099,0.00053838646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052003128,0.0013808399,0.01394241,0.00045756492,0.000013917627,0.0012411574,0.4730354,0.000316158,0.0036254697,0.061063815,0.20266849,0.24220279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044071377,0.00045776094,0.019561045,0.0008597596,0.00003475746,0.0009339533,0.36050004,0.0006958307,0.0025054219,0.019850101,0.59450287,0.00005437383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18050504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36681437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18050504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0157796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031642444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35890877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733552843","doi":"","title":"The Resignation of Robin Camp: Background and Reflections","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07062323850167589,"score_gpt":0.43197637789007304,"score_spread":0.36135313938839714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733552843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025986678,0.0092769675,0.00016001523,0.96070665,0.0072552725,0.000021095186,0.000036815825,0.000014881067,0.01992959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08031328,0.0130330585,0.000532549,0.8615259,0.0054446026,0.000084807994,0.000044078024,0.00016007705,0.03886159],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9604399,0.017713405,0.000803039,0.0035024728,0.008923634,0.008617542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9540931,0.027076127,0.0012395151,0.0008169296,0.008582411,0.008191894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03357069,0.0009843061,0.001382415,0.0021382573,0.06603317,0.023466647,0.0076232874,0.041396078,0.010162485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06527187,0.0010215158,0.0009058201,0.0037396671,0.051585786,0.013894282,0.01015663,0.07303729,0.0028320234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037104684,0.00006764361,0.00027330266,0.00016008104,0.000008445413,0.00091880007,0.104216404,0.00008598259,0.00016804323,0.11737808,0.7671345,0.009551562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016634638,0.000023029497,0.00054001954,0.0009498834,0.000006543706,0.00019124753,0.12426783,0.00006213294,0.00019344874,0.011091287,0.862554,0.00010385649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6618141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74969405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6618141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07964085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11938613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6803551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735705522","doi":"","title":"Ontario student group wants fair pay mandated for those in Law Practice Program","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1407327515873532,"score_gpt":0.49900070356577086,"score_spread":0.35826795197841765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735705522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33569658,0.00031742142,0.0011767632,0.08995623,0.0012001086,0.0014837894,0.005976961,0.0003547959,0.56383735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3906974,0.00016903535,0.0014987403,0.024019929,0.00026840597,0.0005619427,0.0013562659,0.00007427791,0.581354],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983333,0.0009761667,0.00038608935,0.00085640105,0.0070518185,0.007396511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619517,0.0032687548,0.00091399765,0.0014850163,0.0106730405,0.02170762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007915091,0.00029039112,0.00063405174,0.0014168776,0.016390244,0.005424491,0.0030826088,0.007663053,0.03464125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02074258,0.0007122766,0.00071264664,0.0012570017,0.002192613,0.0012191056,0.003661069,0.0055238814,0.00523791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061453844,0.0016908272,0.19576573,0.00012769771,0.00007235869,0.0009045022,0.008071545,0.000566364,0.003188234,0.07632761,0.6553762,0.0572944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003216674,0.00035446574,0.48566252,0.00016350394,0.000090723144,0.00028614138,0.009775217,0.0010260817,0.002146481,0.004365824,0.49568987,0.00011751447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85763144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9775059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14236856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03611893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18442225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28641397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737854651","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v6n4p79","title":"Criminal Justice Majors’ Basic Knowledge of U.S. Constitutional Rights and Pedagogical Implications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Criminal justice; Constitution; Psychology; Economic Justice; Political science; Questionnaire; Pedagogy; Medical education; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.17276578593722275,"score_gpt":0.5146445853530096,"score_spread":0.34187879941578686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737854651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967487,0.000033610453,0.000048725,0.00023047856,0.0000026436142,0.000016005919,0.000032150452,0.0000035702321,0.002884175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985669,0.00008228741,0.00012854993,0.00006063155,0.0000030811188,0.000011161633,0.00005998201,8.446098e-7,0.0010866264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994067,0.00018914448,0.000042019703,0.000056919598,0.00017318035,0.00013198834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99331033,0.0022079537,0.002181116,0.00029701606,0.00096086203,0.0010427046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012737372,0.00016760878,0.0001850291,0.0006379003,0.00073496153,0.0014601426,0.00025596665,0.00034782395,0.0060081105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009002612,0.0001594857,0.00012099527,0.00042770215,0.00076597556,0.0008231084,0.000846421,0.0009025786,0.0007524875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010013408,0.0024053678,0.8838085,0.00010919447,0.000019092962,0.00024328002,0.024574876,0.00042465728,0.003719844,0.001235042,0.00321421,0.08014594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008284563,0.0007590907,0.97403777,0.00006506515,0.000008567825,0.0001800549,0.016947346,0.0005908104,0.0010566072,0.0005078035,0.0058246367,0.000013966308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004466728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018512947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060081105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005756165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015389434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020099163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738069810","doi":"10.1177/002070200305800123","title":"Review: Miscellaneous: What Went Wrong?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.017229727694777836,"score_gpt":0.3897176892652419,"score_spread":0.3724879615704641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738069810","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017626557,0.15897377,0.00053163315,0.6411538,0.19811065,0.000080798134,0.00028021378,0.00009537395,0.0005975005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004149002,0.07788015,0.0023785008,0.777192,0.13596456,0.00024105607,0.00019092597,0.000101519225,0.0019021927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9016502,0.04536471,0.024469553,0.008668166,0.017301822,0.0025455563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57353866,0.21375585,0.04099966,0.015596352,0.1442561,0.0118533885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1266587,0.003545142,0.01070808,0.011967671,0.005660531,0.013619843,0.008977712,0.03984982,0.011370743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38133448,0.0023315784,0.0056678867,0.014853732,0.016433671,0.018543024,0.0057037952,0.022622826,0.008470433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001431888,0.000026094753,0.00066569075,0.012614972,0.00074243266,0.0003216382,0.00025944464,0.00004816498,0.0000818618,0.0020998623,0.9543901,0.028606528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004475349,0.000092249815,0.002273759,0.037805703,0.0038248543,0.0010957564,0.001739823,0.00052294094,0.00036513637,0.024951246,0.9265577,0.0003231189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014065505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1266587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012066499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026267191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6698432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740102883","doi":"","title":"WHAT ENSURES EFFECTIVE STATE-FUNDED LEGAL AID SYSTEM? (A guide for the reform of the current state-funded Legal Aid System in Jamaica)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Economic Justice; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.026185735280732855,"score_gpt":0.35543007856993347,"score_spread":0.3292443432892006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740102883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067110495,0.23027158,0.0070757126,0.283739,0.015362617,0.0022281634,0.001890037,0.00068355957,0.45203832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07035687,0.1380949,0.032853644,0.081613466,0.0033066256,0.0022516898,0.0013781752,0.00024636532,0.6698984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991191,0.00030744783,0.00007832547,0.00007478111,0.0002453592,0.0001749506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919397,0.00026429945,0.000070803464,0.000029888777,0.0002199192,0.00022115819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001706434,0.0005490779,0.00036087117,0.0027600415,0.0075838063,0.005281958,0.0018874931,0.006921341,0.018599063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002737387,0.00044592118,0.00038291945,0.0026317865,0.00337659,0.004183322,0.002119375,0.005318117,0.002969543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001120211,0.00017741729,0.0018465087,0.00086640904,0.0000043122045,0.00076208595,0.008154785,0.0004421626,0.0004945698,0.13121295,0.67287576,0.18315186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070661918,0.000024195371,0.0034235076,0.0010288748,0.000002944346,0.00016677048,0.0033035,0.0001949276,0.00010200855,0.0057776542,0.98595154,0.000016931395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19901107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40340474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19901107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015539213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02956868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3957054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741916342","doi":"10.1177/1474022217722510","title":"Putting authentic learning on trial: Using trials as a pedagogical model for teaching in the humanities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arts and Humanities in Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Authentic learning; Pedagogy; Experiential learning; Psychology; Discipline; Mathematics education; Sociology","score_opus":0.6998002977862227,"score_gpt":0.5646528101307715,"score_spread":0.13514748765545115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741916342","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2259766,0.0024190808,0.52957755,0.025610868,0.0012202896,0.0034014417,0.00015297475,0.000924415,0.21071681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7989117,0.0015909456,0.18244274,0.0016960517,0.00014188033,0.0035314607,0.000097478805,0.00022682619,0.011360921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95156384,0.043297466,0.00076055026,0.0016924925,0.0020506699,0.0006349129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9552932,0.03125904,0.002278848,0.0065485863,0.0013821543,0.0032382272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022449592,0.0008803747,0.00059547205,0.0013687126,0.0041091857,0.013363086,0.0040152217,0.0034800791,0.007250854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046141002,0.0005519699,0.0008405497,0.00082875806,0.022169778,0.01573654,0.01217684,0.0044067292,0.0016212148],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031951358,0.0016735193,0.0048829154,0.001522739,0.000046638288,0.0007329019,0.16980661,0.0058100387,0.004342071,0.64475363,0.009811723,0.15629774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036961425,0.0028546108,0.002184503,0.002567832,0.00006870799,0.001778429,0.07823067,0.011300242,0.0068932096,0.5048982,0.38859537,0.00025862566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005040764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010642264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022449592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003013452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004264501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11872625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747861587","doi":"","title":"Integrating Civil and Common Law Teaching Throughout the Curriculum: The Canadian Experience","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Penn State international law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Law; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.06457611961266785,"score_gpt":0.4282295086886362,"score_spread":0.36365338907596834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747861587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42665252,0.014411028,0.0023885071,0.21434702,0.0028151073,0.00067044597,0.0007395095,0.00023065493,0.3377452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8117394,0.016453162,0.005251925,0.01975078,0.00028515834,0.00022027786,0.00042150664,0.00018609872,0.14569172],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99029946,0.0013808516,0.0001949285,0.00056184933,0.0042089983,0.0033539322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784224,0.0025822676,0.00058717484,0.00033766497,0.0073726904,0.010697798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008425776,0.0005022675,0.0007425192,0.0025963553,0.05186664,0.010458184,0.0029845792,0.0048589734,0.01167112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014143907,0.0008203154,0.00053662306,0.0092966305,0.006825839,0.0034850931,0.005627292,0.0056676366,0.00070166134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002983146,0.0019357603,0.034276363,0.00064837246,0.00006124081,0.00295994,0.19304287,0.0013691178,0.0020410002,0.07960048,0.2863712,0.39739534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089935114,0.00021864564,0.06250524,0.0003573517,0.000045136298,0.00059696316,0.11778659,0.000629238,0.000533114,0.002538801,0.81455684,0.00014218129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18385653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18385653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.49255213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94661075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748555408","doi":"","title":"Foreword of UBC Special Issue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04229635508594467,"score_gpt":0.39498499934534104,"score_spread":0.3526886442593964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748555408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002879376,0.008539815,0.0005722392,0.020265304,0.21215357,0.0003061945,0.0054889326,0.0013187503,0.7510672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012506376,0.0035370612,0.00024927914,0.007919604,0.03875165,0.00013462409,0.0030696164,0.0005750269,0.94451267],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983931,0.00013163828,0.00012188085,0.00021076661,0.0009568877,0.00018564113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952236,0.00046496527,0.00020563163,0.00040182273,0.0027904557,0.00091365597],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012290282,0.0012002902,0.0011584852,0.003609551,0.0036544604,0.008434019,0.0019004307,0.004580267,0.58349437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066000745,0.00047599015,0.000704203,0.003135444,0.0006698297,0.004741697,0.0022594205,0.004217714,0.5362341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000581852,0.000006892157,0.000015292784,0.000036967114,6.391049e-7,0.000013904601,0.0000038192784,0.0000064373644,0.000024921932,0.0004455215,0.98896605,0.010473796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018964078,0.0000042284423,0.00013552395,0.000069802554,7.702865e-7,0.000016092126,0.000012591141,0.000011651202,0.000024111936,0.00018628096,0.99953425,0.0000028245402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008015064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011220333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58349437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028095292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035236413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59409475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749389623","doi":"10.1097/01.naj.0000524546.50943.9e","title":"Lessons Learned from Litigation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AJN American Journal of Nursing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.24160333396390213,"score_gpt":0.523125701463162,"score_spread":0.28152236749925985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749389623","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023521695,0.012012538,0.0009073209,0.9492882,0.0072608935,0.000020456659,0.000047232326,0.000049568687,0.028061656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17991324,0.03608726,0.0024876366,0.72904813,0.020185877,0.00014434861,0.00014728705,0.00019221012,0.03179394],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763316,0.011351069,0.0011633781,0.0023533043,0.005172705,0.00362789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9164014,0.054793324,0.0021006512,0.0029834171,0.0125771845,0.011144027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026129955,0.000713577,0.0009486661,0.0026269725,0.018232826,0.01603922,0.004374151,0.027505549,0.030149726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11479974,0.00062548975,0.00130703,0.0014623036,0.017442117,0.026466465,0.0080727255,0.032951817,0.0040269373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035078778,0.00014343725,0.0016402957,0.00049458625,0.000030751497,0.0036024563,0.017718036,0.000277106,0.000074270196,0.13356924,0.75683796,0.08557683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005162791,0.000066925626,0.0014282281,0.0037384767,0.000032660308,0.004844435,0.050446026,0.00028206693,0.00018006323,0.1705009,0.7683366,0.000091990114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019986007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040256683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030149726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01014153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027053125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13819009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750392139","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v12i1.3988","title":"Legal Information Innovation in Saskatchewan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Library science; Identifier; Legal research; Humanities; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09462484016722532,"score_gpt":0.4216650859719554,"score_spread":0.32704024580473007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750392139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19218923,0.008989188,0.0025163577,0.0831953,0.00094995194,0.0008239948,0.005274142,0.00052149815,0.7055403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38383144,0.009440537,0.0048452285,0.015221905,0.000106171356,0.0008402895,0.0031978327,0.00018320131,0.58233345],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665713,0.00056498044,0.00017119785,0.00045453358,0.0011309215,0.0010212086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912915,0.002204572,0.00039128488,0.00059378863,0.0027111978,0.0028077052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024344479,0.00040523757,0.00047455064,0.002944449,0.015504559,0.011734107,0.0021866872,0.0027050313,0.056386743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005388443,0.0006423643,0.00061307766,0.008123909,0.0052003763,0.003628044,0.0073911664,0.0032012796,0.00681436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028368115,0.00067509233,0.04247289,0.0014640122,0.00014314764,0.007223494,0.028309576,0.0025951373,0.0057254448,0.3124859,0.2430918,0.35552981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048917216,0.00007065973,0.059808973,0.00078552414,0.000027251728,0.0004044781,0.025296826,0.0010366249,0.00087122695,0.008591078,0.90291446,0.00014399248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9252102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9736015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89752775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10247227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2381642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7434918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750478892","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6351-044-8_8","title":"Canada: Canada’s Egalitarian Debate","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Political science; Crying; Media studies; Economic history; Economic growth; Public administration; Sociology; History; Economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.040891447747352476,"score_gpt":0.2939019537091974,"score_spread":0.25301050596184493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750478892","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026923863,0.050796397,0.00032419548,0.5867862,0.0055091656,0.000016802695,0.0003708238,0.000098136494,0.3534058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12342391,0.056298543,0.0010374404,0.39221135,0.0028968982,0.00006060932,0.0003331155,0.00036163413,0.42337644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942544,0.00047569617,0.00007831009,0.00044873075,0.0029601702,0.0017827254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958276,0.0010064121,0.000109451525,0.00015080662,0.0017633922,0.0011423877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034010378,0.000716118,0.000715318,0.0029135938,0.028815927,0.021862991,0.0036067788,0.012369755,0.02424619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070854034,0.00057084346,0.0006531314,0.0061735366,0.01685824,0.008260766,0.004529408,0.012896595,0.0029709267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009466137,0.000009789565,0.00015520408,0.00009062095,0.000006167227,0.000095660864,0.002025102,0.000058081594,0.00004244213,0.2677679,0.7165695,0.013170038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067103297,0.0000018074063,0.0004069264,0.00022868598,0.000007630234,0.000034403987,0.0022489217,0.00005031413,0.00003841085,0.011112555,0.98584557,0.000018099774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99315625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18020837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18020837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25766033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9508421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751937031","doi":"","title":"Is Law an Academic Discipline","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Virtue; Legitimacy; Argument (complex analysis); Discipline; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.2228594550359763,"score_gpt":0.5607685668968105,"score_spread":0.3379091118608343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751937031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025951851,0.008930215,0.0063609965,0.3968875,0.0030627945,0.0000401702,0.000072693474,0.00012441329,0.5585693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8637793,0.009007899,0.003073503,0.0733701,0.009953446,0.00009765476,0.0000939573,0.000112846,0.04051126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97192085,0.014343839,0.0010399842,0.0031351775,0.0060573607,0.0035027305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9244523,0.029792715,0.009313349,0.009010105,0.011263503,0.016167877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023258941,0.00029580365,0.0009027352,0.003466262,0.012442204,0.021338454,0.0020406118,0.009863095,0.01353681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042052638,0.00032352345,0.0007302416,0.0048872586,0.050173286,0.023465253,0.009649825,0.009718604,0.0033592738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000763117,0.00003882397,0.00080310804,0.000053770724,0.0000069526277,0.000042770444,0.0031168165,0.000043633274,0.000043823988,0.9807505,0.008456451,0.006635649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021665644,0.000051006195,0.0013765469,0.00034043877,0.000019036097,0.00014813125,0.0077925804,0.00018965149,0.00016631669,0.66305673,0.3268158,0.000021982538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035349438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034071335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023258941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009497396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025058612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12300652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752080828","doi":"","title":"Vocational Discernment: Personal Recollections","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections Canadian Journal of Music","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discernment; Vocational education; Psychology; Philosophy; Pedagogy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07887919405590774,"score_gpt":0.3086591120516482,"score_spread":0.22977991799574046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752080828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54723483,0.011010183,0.025473572,0.077171445,0.0025580528,0.00011242371,0.0005210918,0.00038984558,0.3355285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966965,0.0014297406,0.0025705502,0.0016515887,0.00046972805,0.000034165998,0.00017656799,0.00016446822,0.026538232],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954046,0.002638324,0.00018571682,0.0003591537,0.000905068,0.00050723064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97457904,0.016647212,0.0020263821,0.0018882517,0.0029042892,0.001954843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070052613,0.0004686871,0.00031657692,0.003745392,0.010736348,0.012293802,0.0012755048,0.002799747,0.007038246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05555581,0.0004224382,0.00031251687,0.002693695,0.009994807,0.010088658,0.0067581027,0.006227359,0.0013321096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057509526,0.000032448876,0.0063267685,0.00007137545,0.000008717512,0.0006149068,0.89155793,0.000047305184,0.00037356283,0.054436136,0.017888473,0.028584827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005506604,0.000023922788,0.0048624077,0.0002828671,0.000011468717,0.0016405298,0.7465931,0.00031898028,0.0005796907,0.022956803,0.22267905,0.000045652152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042080884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008732117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012293802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034111526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026811222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037047803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752252557","doi":"","title":"A case for a family court in Nova Scotia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Political science; History; Engineering; Ethnology; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.06131052417941358,"score_gpt":0.36605760375782426,"score_spread":0.3047470795784107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752252557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49984938,0.0069634477,0.00081634976,0.2588876,0.0052010063,0.00021341316,0.00031052498,0.000050506173,0.2277078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7828434,0.0019217673,0.00047005393,0.08650345,0.00063296023,0.000074441414,0.0000637914,0.00005342816,0.1274367],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972886,0.00030955707,0.00008804816,0.00020313778,0.00025762175,0.0018530415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951652,0.0011297445,0.00025267192,0.00012244031,0.0005201766,0.0028096756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011072989,0.0003696009,0.00066400383,0.00095985574,0.046799786,0.00607802,0.0023586047,0.028793639,0.0151630435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069761295,0.0011294343,0.0007867598,0.00096313015,0.0044174767,0.0014659711,0.0050992835,0.022341842,0.0011221606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035350237,0.00017757424,0.025217118,0.00026969943,0.00019102277,0.5351737,0.077949,0.0011832732,0.002700945,0.12125536,0.21687539,0.018653408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002507899,0.00019982416,0.07661642,0.00266763,0.0003265073,0.10613012,0.20623548,0.0018064011,0.0012268238,0.02295156,0.58114076,0.00044768205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7682386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9589101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.975216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024784032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034503303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46625257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752413816","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3026379","title":"The Double Life of Law Schools","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04630884287051673,"score_gpt":0.39989212074583563,"score_spread":0.3535832778753189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752413816","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15105559,0.0037462346,0.003012217,0.5615704,0.0020138405,0.000045169552,0.00019406139,0.000103636696,0.27825886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9308531,0.0006749311,0.00051781413,0.026068637,0.00070173695,0.000043274234,0.000048180227,0.00012207821,0.04097021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98824036,0.005621688,0.00022326603,0.0013304193,0.0018934553,0.002690855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97678035,0.005454518,0.0014873906,0.0017211837,0.0028349527,0.011721531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009179375,0.00030236482,0.0006724185,0.0026628852,0.026104556,0.018034777,0.0015302685,0.008492383,0.02996468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028777115,0.00057113764,0.0004091062,0.0018111778,0.036434855,0.024528522,0.01621116,0.013539056,0.0024580809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033746717,0.00007703513,0.0029111698,0.000025390265,0.000009215868,0.00014839837,0.0402748,0.00007349917,0.000093849034,0.89112306,0.04655307,0.018676803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043453336,0.000064487875,0.0059355586,0.00023770657,0.0000116093615,0.00020547611,0.08339056,0.00025260923,0.00021718505,0.38265297,0.52693903,0.00004934297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018083204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03387236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02996468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012950293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016074652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10024184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752781273","doi":"10.14426/jacl.v1i1.1314","title":"PECUNIA NON OLET: DIRTY MONEY AS LEGAL FEES","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Anti-Corruption Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Payment; Law; Money laundering; Position (finance); Business; Representation (politics); Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.03745303285310207,"score_gpt":0.38891502025789554,"score_spread":0.35146198740479345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752781273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050240524,0.0067992164,0.005762347,0.030992845,0.0005328062,0.00005649131,0.000064781816,0.000034499168,0.9055164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8764483,0.0036894933,0.0018437874,0.005851355,0.00045430235,0.000064677144,0.000030830957,0.000046525616,0.111570805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725395,0.00063266495,0.00009645163,0.00025842924,0.0011475611,0.0006109695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978436,0.00094158074,0.00045743564,0.0002523758,0.000345214,0.00015968135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011846189,0.0002705537,0.00027895282,0.001005802,0.004198137,0.008553809,0.0007313159,0.0038689077,0.0072727273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008413996,0.0002410206,0.00026796755,0.0010836578,0.013337542,0.0062542674,0.0036330512,0.0049231322,0.00073136576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044817507,0.0000033080285,0.00019244124,0.000012141741,9.4259474e-7,0.000091666625,0.0008812859,0.00004981775,0.000053005086,0.9932894,0.0014540461,0.003967517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021543405,0.000055540375,0.004408968,0.0005364107,0.000015580643,0.0010057731,0.0033330314,0.0006731351,0.0008724334,0.46131778,0.5277237,0.000036175228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015088338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020200128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015088338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005212183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005646533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03781724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753831710","doi":"10.29173/alr2448","title":"Risk Regulation for the Legal Profession","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Legal service; Law and economics; Object (grammar); Business; State (computer science); Legal profession; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.051475250521606036,"score_gpt":0.431840743153976,"score_spread":0.38036549263236996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753831710","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014850099,0.04434809,0.018217856,0.608976,0.0032168604,0.00008823276,0.00011027906,0.00016521662,0.3100273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67547435,0.04655222,0.01849844,0.1619475,0.0036693006,0.00017473545,0.00015533484,0.00015706563,0.09337114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9564928,0.007386379,0.00096277933,0.0032068752,0.02681096,0.0051401444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541581,0.016525473,0.0022398764,0.0024620171,0.021375239,0.0032393604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027303537,0.0004839662,0.00056193676,0.0028430086,0.014874469,0.0142343175,0.0030161594,0.009540609,0.0065592416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043189235,0.00038420397,0.0012188182,0.001955222,0.031009598,0.0065216,0.0047922893,0.011461993,0.00080446264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058303144,0.0000143475445,0.0005012566,0.00008458987,0.000006032963,0.000041138268,0.001810583,0.0004092862,0.000147219,0.9622944,0.015402539,0.019282825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002158563,0.00003730737,0.0034696227,0.0015191038,0.000042267046,0.000093779796,0.0032221335,0.00112408,0.0004610249,0.22356462,0.7663289,0.000115613235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8661499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82650083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8661499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10192989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25801736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73955655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754221173","doi":"10.12927/hcpap.2017.25199","title":"Acting in the Public Interest: The Heart of Professional Regulation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"A Nudge Too Far? A Nudge at All? On Paying People to Be Healthy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"College & Association of Registered Nurses of Alberta; College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Corporate governance; Regulator; Perception; Public relations; Government regulation; Public administration; Business; Political science; Law; Psychology; Biology; Neuroscience; Finance","score_opus":0.22895652866448196,"score_gpt":0.47108665749445555,"score_spread":0.2421301288299736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754221173","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007958196,0.012092627,0.028511375,0.7680384,0.0037093658,0.00007996928,0.000030786858,0.00014564411,0.17943366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69102186,0.008889182,0.008347103,0.25880322,0.006680408,0.00024467512,0.000056832625,0.00027553938,0.02568121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.917881,0.039419763,0.0017118787,0.007953948,0.02326832,0.009765099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8882882,0.071276695,0.005517989,0.009019818,0.014975851,0.010921609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.065712534,0.0006723637,0.0014277296,0.0027880562,0.022059256,0.034735017,0.004199912,0.025195614,0.0053546624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06615325,0.00080906216,0.001094875,0.0023999608,0.16432214,0.021903394,0.013841111,0.041199625,0.0012609769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006738065,0.000026773572,0.00059961696,0.0000524928,0.000009379551,0.000074874966,0.012692451,0.00011646569,0.00006134332,0.9621751,0.01433432,0.009850412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027304422,0.00002661982,0.0011153481,0.00069284684,0.000016589549,0.00013658969,0.010734343,0.00048647387,0.00022112689,0.6958891,0.2905866,0.00006691067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07654087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054163568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07654087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036089566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07262473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34752524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756531106","doi":"","title":"Manitoba directory of legal information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.021819308435841615,"score_gpt":0.2871765076273733,"score_spread":0.26535719919153167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756531106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026337986,0.0034421568,0.00018308287,0.0033501028,0.0003860761,0.00013614622,0.049716707,0.0012904131,0.9388615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023115883,0.002183552,0.00032158455,0.0003701913,0.000032068212,0.000035676723,0.0068761446,0.00020783623,0.9876615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999406,0.000025119823,0.000023278566,0.000052277872,0.00037904253,0.00011426826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976236,0.0001732579,0.000097945434,0.00011937382,0.0015919476,0.00039382977],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039188034,0.00094369974,0.0006498258,0.009942463,0.0068605673,0.004948087,0.0016686671,0.0010949852,0.55391616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019960676,0.0008778843,0.00031757148,0.01957585,0.00090094144,0.0019787108,0.0013016149,0.0010715394,0.25676373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010849775,0.00002595379,0.0011005794,0.00014792067,0.0000024839776,0.00006132957,0.0002199822,0.000032356,0.00012488605,0.0026705163,0.94867164,0.046931516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006648499,0.0000050985436,0.0050607636,0.00018987204,0.000004123488,0.000036028854,0.0005140782,0.00008181448,0.00012264802,0.00038033593,0.9935875,0.000011152164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86392134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9630157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55391616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01558497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058456052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6362845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757973687","doi":"","title":"Reaching the diverse public of Alberta, Canada: How law librarians helped fill a gap in legal information delivery and access to justice through an innovative and collaborative new website","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal advice; Economic Justice; Law; Legal research; Jurisdiction; Political science; Legal profession; Information overload; Public relations; Sociology","score_opus":0.11765888028579287,"score_gpt":0.35735471466452334,"score_spread":0.2396958343787305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757973687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42302775,0.0063096075,0.0036602244,0.26872265,0.001363323,0.00042205633,0.00042165202,0.0013813114,0.29469144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81583095,0.004195274,0.0062332894,0.04773989,0.00016284616,0.00012553678,0.00043574529,0.0004927497,0.124783695],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98946536,0.0030171862,0.00020157272,0.0006933019,0.0031537414,0.003468811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977227,0.0051552355,0.00054311426,0.00073061156,0.0060208417,0.010323325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008855023,0.0006121198,0.0006243319,0.0030924839,0.08561175,0.027060933,0.004255254,0.0050081573,0.013923215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016674802,0.0008261714,0.000594856,0.005717685,0.019170025,0.00961154,0.013240584,0.0060485625,0.0017754455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015227849,0.00046588728,0.025155433,0.0003568527,0.000056720164,0.004402122,0.50814164,0.00048559325,0.0014363413,0.030477295,0.26024207,0.16862777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003083816,0.00006921363,0.010593469,0.00027237498,0.000052354473,0.00029104177,0.56078404,0.00044953616,0.00044698018,0.0032836667,0.42360428,0.0001222125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98189837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99382544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15013981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15013981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3336513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98571736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758435532","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v2i0.158","title":"Authority of Law: An Analysis of The Role of Police","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Law; Political science; Legal education; Jurisprudence; Class (philosophy); Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08380672927142097,"score_gpt":0.44393193836517947,"score_spread":0.3601252090937585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758435532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25964767,0.0014766355,0.005520289,0.012621006,0.00011416333,0.00007496102,0.000075232456,0.000018037046,0.720452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912355,0.00032940152,0.0002775061,0.00013083457,0.000026013196,0.000017234057,0.000015875154,0.000011403995,0.007956297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99459547,0.00276282,0.00013409217,0.00036220255,0.0010780914,0.0010672816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819449,0.012142555,0.0015940521,0.0006581758,0.002217821,0.0014424578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005230598,0.00020209531,0.00030228036,0.0030965055,0.006341403,0.0067245527,0.0014791511,0.0016594036,0.018257525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020329013,0.00023981716,0.0005240808,0.0024090884,0.013119235,0.008473974,0.0038966804,0.0025046614,0.0010733457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025035217,0.000045482626,0.006365223,0.000041299878,0.000005878263,0.00034612595,0.04693964,0.00032721454,0.00008580979,0.93638563,0.0020450987,0.00738763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007812113,0.00012551324,0.038563587,0.00075136713,0.00007492365,0.0008985262,0.28564662,0.008285932,0.0006493133,0.44294894,0.22192417,0.000052990126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017344633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016936868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018257525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00575473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007972785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061077535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759043714","doi":"","title":"Doing legal research in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05869408646306996,"score_gpt":0.35625075620177515,"score_spread":0.2975566697387052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759043714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039179,0.038988773,0.0018322977,0.19760467,0.004931908,0.00021836528,0.0029798888,0.0006470357,0.7488791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04305692,0.024871757,0.0038902108,0.026140315,0.0006570154,0.00013893923,0.00092469057,0.000316476,0.9000036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99102134,0.00080896704,0.00022803432,0.0005844831,0.0052013327,0.0021558655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98163795,0.002815625,0.00029075178,0.0007383138,0.007578968,0.006938337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005881512,0.00073153124,0.0009494048,0.0045346655,0.02256337,0.018511115,0.00206161,0.0046235365,0.068569615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01672559,0.0010600539,0.00072430546,0.008251758,0.0069274204,0.0036206394,0.0033787102,0.0049440786,0.009271933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073083684,0.000021456188,0.0008492171,0.00009076622,0.0000068906143,0.000082963954,0.0011485503,0.00010809194,0.00008649854,0.061349876,0.88696283,0.04928554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041752332,0.000004053198,0.0018747824,0.00014951137,0.000006056666,0.000029961962,0.0015147855,0.00007165381,0.000055481618,0.0036938505,0.99258125,0.000014528742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9918247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15143667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15143667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5331249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759049322","doi":"10.1177/1541931213601601","title":"Cross-Border Testifying Tips: U.S. Experts in Canada and Canadian Experts in the U.S.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Advantage Forensics (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Expert witness; Expert opinion; Witness; Session (web analytics); Public relations; Political science; Law; Psychology; Business; Advertising; Medicine","score_opus":0.03659912006657081,"score_gpt":0.3597258214825919,"score_spread":0.3231267014160211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759049322","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24940614,0.016040107,0.0014298192,0.5356628,0.00910063,0.00058621715,0.0008503293,0.000118429896,0.18680558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7979908,0.011319723,0.0022054533,0.08182978,0.0006641366,0.000191156,0.0005365143,0.00009707975,0.105165266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98964334,0.001389927,0.00022975686,0.00077124924,0.003013757,0.0049518864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803258,0.0021378645,0.00041536448,0.00020789348,0.010040861,0.006872269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010345611,0.0006058458,0.0005573027,0.0017116064,0.042566694,0.0076890513,0.0025901636,0.0065902555,0.00963105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016543174,0.00052192225,0.0006120696,0.0029427903,0.0048950356,0.0028620346,0.0058394955,0.006749381,0.00090358796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013488968,0.0001338794,0.015683373,0.0003727575,0.000034364584,0.0025640454,0.22358869,0.00031482626,0.0017945489,0.0100189075,0.666672,0.07868781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016956834,0.00005143214,0.020034026,0.00058632385,0.00002903088,0.00034780972,0.49737588,0.00015690758,0.0004976873,0.00078260095,0.48001364,0.000107839456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9771827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99507684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078165464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078165464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.208733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56713283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760226389","doi":"10.29173/alr793","title":"Trinity Western University Law: The Boundary and Ethos of the Legal Community","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bombardier (Canada); Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Framing (construction); Legal profession; Law; Legal realism; Sociology; Virtue; Boundary (topology); Political science; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09106277014716607,"score_gpt":0.4005203509608735,"score_spread":0.30945758081370744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760226389","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062371608,0.14327584,0.0033843939,0.42801118,0.0029627536,0.00005832008,0.000034432942,0.000043721393,0.35985777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8484385,0.040222853,0.0018325804,0.054777745,0.0011502822,0.00016020365,0.000039481263,0.000048875012,0.053329553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98608893,0.009003079,0.00029037343,0.00068504614,0.0028052141,0.0011273398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98863286,0.006754874,0.00074627047,0.00037938158,0.0018872183,0.0015994784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009614087,0.00013664464,0.00037306527,0.0022485082,0.008572296,0.010584487,0.0013402756,0.006483639,0.004666635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015703872,0.00027627114,0.0001838857,0.0021997173,0.018211352,0.004889617,0.0059312745,0.0048705917,0.00044266257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013318188,0.000022088769,0.0008814794,0.0002755702,0.0000062845247,0.00021647687,0.009249017,0.0001036966,0.000118778575,0.9128993,0.03973164,0.036482368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020925187,0.00006764261,0.008477022,0.0035554166,0.000024103127,0.00027973717,0.02499285,0.00040109482,0.00032233977,0.18179207,0.78001106,0.00005573593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091400646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18596038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091400646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018461794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0412818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1817373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761011433","doi":"","title":"Ontario. Ministry of the Attorney General","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03256073962577753,"score_gpt":0.3070939120640022,"score_spread":0.27453317243822467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761011433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029996906,0.004112181,0.00022778857,0.036375355,0.003981182,0.00031855045,0.042634387,0.0007999644,0.9085509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046851737,0.0009654232,0.00016576335,0.0022680662,0.0001347031,0.00004496353,0.0026259897,0.00012653063,0.98898333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974414,0.00010689283,0.00009475284,0.00018978104,0.0011691788,0.0009979041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536836,0.00021856175,0.00015358817,0.00017247349,0.0027689147,0.0013182381],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010610967,0.000782351,0.0006914282,0.0026808302,0.005504555,0.004138873,0.0015978059,0.0038074031,0.45449576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033151,0.0010090254,0.0008117178,0.0035746677,0.0010399999,0.0012606375,0.0018917297,0.0022023679,0.13035986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031298056,0.000014412718,0.0007633597,0.000083978695,0.0000044133017,0.00005063807,0.00007789755,0.00003027962,0.00003619934,0.0042389054,0.9795529,0.015115697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014765867,0.00000402009,0.0037649444,0.000050600138,0.0000048219417,0.000016929778,0.0001583475,0.0000453105,0.000028995208,0.000298344,0.9956043,0.000008745834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.961305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9844492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95225066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047749363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12042783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7780956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761140052","doi":"","title":"Law Society of Upper Canada. Library","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013771247791605557,"score_gpt":0.24777564961875229,"score_spread":0.23400440182714674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761140052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058395177,0.0026949588,0.00017921052,0.0078106294,0.0011204225,0.00009484463,0.024218306,0.0010007072,0.962297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002272524,0.0013999733,0.00017227825,0.0010098795,0.00006619034,0.000018916668,0.002569455,0.0001816072,0.9923091],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856323,0.000041625903,0.00004677801,0.00012449951,0.00085126236,0.00037260394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946484,0.0002515993,0.000106446016,0.00026188302,0.0037483347,0.0009833289],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000581597,0.0009345654,0.0010832321,0.0046488,0.009684868,0.0092027895,0.0021231098,0.0033144904,0.64148104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038249814,0.00081967935,0.0005189424,0.010032326,0.001888262,0.0021693541,0.002323443,0.0023997151,0.34121606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000930982,0.000012919058,0.00024183985,0.00009518791,0.0000024767976,0.000044783766,0.00007041626,0.00002373017,0.00004060309,0.0028544548,0.95991707,0.03668724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029397047,0.0000017731181,0.001048389,0.000079717836,0.0000025292536,0.000014571043,0.00017083228,0.00002744831,0.000049123464,0.00028206987,0.9983138,0.0000069372004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9607255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9867193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64148104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030131696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09225005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5113838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761199428","doi":"","title":"Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biography | US Enciclopedia of law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Continuing education; Legal education; Law; Public administration; Medicine; Medical education","score_opus":0.01508946184815249,"score_gpt":0.3004024101810271,"score_spread":0.2853129483328746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761199428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01990794,0.023922708,0.00079214596,0.22736536,0.017350838,0.00019764499,0.0049042436,0.0006284284,0.7049307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015221884,0.0036543654,0.00031249973,0.0035385592,0.00034166864,0.000034791832,0.00060552853,0.0000454467,0.97624534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989041,0.000096334654,0.00005163986,0.00013621677,0.0004578882,0.0003538144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99101794,0.00068683084,0.00020924158,0.0002301203,0.004436902,0.0034190128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011520068,0.00039252455,0.0002894673,0.0019389838,0.005023447,0.0047908593,0.0011751665,0.003507073,0.16717003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005488246,0.0002946547,0.00017961599,0.001871082,0.0008984871,0.0012128437,0.0013684005,0.0032130813,0.022554506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020299009,0.00004230354,0.0023452765,0.00010929383,0.000003244278,0.000217961,0.0005011116,0.00004230955,0.00022437918,0.004759317,0.88861036,0.103124104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043255304,0.000003968039,0.0044413176,0.00010791121,0.0000023409648,0.00005495337,0.00048684244,0.000053191565,0.0000652183,0.0002255571,0.99454874,0.000005642561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7318027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8611288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7318027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014264356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073180184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5592395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762177797","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association continuing education seminars.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Continuing education; Political science; Medical education; Medicine; Geography; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013434147220158028,"score_gpt":0.28918419414000046,"score_spread":0.27575004691984245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762177797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014037335,0.01281982,0.00057383167,0.03258058,0.009587821,0.00018741113,0.0043177633,0.0005902034,0.93793875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032561035,0.0025040915,0.00045631677,0.0017912771,0.000516614,0.000036354748,0.0008472174,0.00007264839,0.9905194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990074,0.000049140297,0.0000253808,0.00010464305,0.00058927067,0.00022420265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960013,0.00022560408,0.00008430394,0.00011759053,0.0016048703,0.0019663102],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012242765,0.00089973275,0.0004916523,0.002843801,0.0062717325,0.003279298,0.0019562868,0.0035704072,0.45628536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003679276,0.000545858,0.00041888215,0.00311317,0.0010065386,0.0019077339,0.0016400082,0.0022477796,0.13240083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005462291,0.00001722783,0.000058578727,0.000019734145,4.1724542e-7,0.000016796888,0.00004314956,0.000014080375,0.000032198415,0.001074012,0.9780471,0.020671338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002783429,0.0000024232393,0.0005609763,0.000027697037,6.047852e-7,0.000012265674,0.00010577509,0.000015546098,0.000019777952,0.00026345238,0.99898523,0.0000034080656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6488418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.911324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45628536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014175391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047154967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.775543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762267370","doi":"","title":"A bibliography of Canadian legal materials = Une bibliographie de documentation juridique canadienne","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Political science; Library science; Bibliography; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0187868311826421,"score_gpt":0.28120635141511624,"score_spread":0.26241952023247417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762267370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016679763,0.23406474,0.001755111,0.010094887,0.006056608,0.00025692696,0.045475528,0.00092577416,0.6997024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02580083,0.44398636,0.011196696,0.006130289,0.0024726032,0.00046498526,0.042270172,0.0011334592,0.4665447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638855,0.00020636118,0.00024352652,0.00023458053,0.0025781733,0.0003487751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936271,0.0011339867,0.00027824464,0.00025693013,0.004356243,0.00034755052],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016522778,0.0014218491,0.0014364799,0.048806634,0.010766828,0.010240146,0.0018795235,0.0014243902,0.12759385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076420363,0.00082742295,0.0006998542,0.12327959,0.004284933,0.003634738,0.0016211724,0.00197423,0.02403562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000141781775,0.000008885813,0.00021265859,0.0013769589,0.0000079671145,0.000052962325,0.0007560801,0.00009189628,0.00013831559,0.021793686,0.8970351,0.07851127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014048678,8.181988e-7,0.0007543034,0.0005450798,0.0000062758945,0.000024487535,0.00015688286,0.0000079838865,0.000035355664,0.0005233734,0.9979361,0.00000786193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9526101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96851003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9511934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05626419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15670413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42684394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763301137","doi":"","title":"Canadian law symposia index.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.018480243560130866,"score_gpt":0.28444786375427333,"score_spread":0.26596762019414244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763301137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027241636,0.009368428,0.00018223116,0.004279745,0.005424342,0.00008796263,0.008598675,0.00081747334,0.97096866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019039456,0.006980705,0.00027390628,0.0009557689,0.0011978657,0.000036991634,0.0041859113,0.00018252741,0.98428243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989316,0.000029843422,0.00002808735,0.00008134339,0.0007116035,0.0002175042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726665,0.00012488021,0.000073884024,0.00009806898,0.001601659,0.00083488785],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046261106,0.001498336,0.0008094685,0.010027794,0.005292433,0.005138063,0.0017807159,0.0015989192,0.6059377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00244598,0.0006368886,0.0005311754,0.014483603,0.0009897354,0.00271343,0.0016361215,0.0017843414,0.28748885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024273927,0.0000045621214,0.00002500343,0.00003237283,3.4531527e-7,0.000009364125,0.000009696172,0.00001051355,0.000018896993,0.00086927245,0.98901635,0.0100011965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011387441,0.0000011793371,0.00030151356,0.00004147158,9.0520075e-7,0.000013534565,0.000028051922,0.000011605125,0.000019141647,0.00020365581,0.99937516,0.0000026267546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6653191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8657888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9782329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02176706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035291832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67330384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763815793","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association. Ontario Branch","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biography | US Enciclopedia of law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Association (psychology); Geography; Meteorology; Psychology","score_opus":0.019982669675281662,"score_gpt":0.2885741739376665,"score_spread":0.2685915042623848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763815793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058217003,0.0041236253,0.00010934802,0.010452039,0.0033429859,0.00005616689,0.006364898,0.00032533432,0.97464335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001248915,0.0009854496,0.00007187196,0.0008670485,0.00012025964,0.000015188352,0.0006073794,0.00007318301,0.99601066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985814,0.00005198368,0.000044743425,0.00016873854,0.00079443,0.0003586159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966628,0.00015022686,0.00011842729,0.00013370566,0.001997346,0.0009374479],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005524239,0.001004014,0.0008326299,0.0035712963,0.008909493,0.005114525,0.0013840741,0.0034464265,0.7419673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023371363,0.00092900655,0.00068979396,0.0063343793,0.0012913105,0.0016035907,0.0016354542,0.0021053525,0.4316094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017102524,0.0000097520415,0.00030125573,0.00004703623,0.0000017864528,0.000022199767,0.000033704004,0.000016520247,0.000021786273,0.0018114983,0.9709796,0.02673782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004947581,0.0000021298,0.0009070228,0.000047461075,0.0000022122686,0.000010587957,0.0000653754,0.000020698724,0.000012397301,0.00023971395,0.99868304,0.0000044044205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8705005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9580133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7419673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019714732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04840422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3680523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763899602","doi":"10.1093/pch/15.suppl_a.12a","title":"Tipping the Scales: Canada's First Medical-Legal Partnership","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paediatrics & Child Health","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023085422547620214,"score_gpt":0.3461315099025685,"score_spread":0.32304608735494833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763899602","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044661323,0.0039195637,0.00058496126,0.95918554,0.006658863,0.00018325247,0.00031350966,0.00011523173,0.024572983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23630281,0.008629347,0.010333869,0.61539215,0.002523952,0.00074254844,0.00095456146,0.00045502634,0.12466572],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9399736,0.007161649,0.001487474,0.0017692951,0.025863111,0.023744866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78758806,0.010373026,0.0025000328,0.0021712792,0.031171737,0.16619588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025241563,0.0010822312,0.0014086921,0.0031687703,0.04701196,0.02353806,0.0060599656,0.029404972,0.029110981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08420745,0.0015036294,0.0017940745,0.0037633984,0.0134402,0.010861273,0.023647455,0.03754531,0.0034120055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031009957,0.00013979955,0.003607719,0.00008829517,0.000021381946,0.00043613158,0.0025267217,0.00014337107,0.00010122309,0.022536468,0.9366189,0.033748973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015236672,0.000118273325,0.027620101,0.0009087034,0.00004787989,0.0004092263,0.022705456,0.00045438702,0.0002238132,0.012924527,0.93418014,0.00025502077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9666404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14301857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14301857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.67583275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763959024","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Geography; Psychology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.013849189390868799,"score_gpt":0.26834572320452066,"score_spread":0.25449653381365184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763959024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042445233,0.0016950114,0.00023193745,0.009084076,0.0036400845,0.00006130593,0.0025782827,0.0003157482,0.98196906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012668686,0.00054738694,0.00013051768,0.0010828451,0.00016734685,0.000015730748,0.0005143433,0.000054413882,0.9962205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966426,0.00009704387,0.00007352761,0.00035119604,0.002220451,0.0006151726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945673,0.00022700588,0.00009920142,0.00030561755,0.004007649,0.0007932023],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011222311,0.00098901,0.0008111646,0.0041822437,0.010417006,0.006789485,0.0018766596,0.0044437195,0.58429265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00526198,0.00084321544,0.00082574243,0.0038132712,0.0015042637,0.0015789812,0.002174123,0.0038483888,0.30462748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007100802,0.000012777203,0.00013428934,0.000023457904,0.0000016495136,0.0000293421,0.00002785153,0.00002141843,0.000036719695,0.007704582,0.96901524,0.022985468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023873768,0.0000015510458,0.0003572226,0.000024018704,0.000001646559,0.00001363291,0.00003899684,0.000023732924,0.000020647387,0.00040339353,0.99910885,0.000004038618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7386316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88511664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58429265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017149989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06219003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59295607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764021189","doi":"","title":"University of Alberta. Legal Resource Centre","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biography | US Enciclopedia of law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Business; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0156365521395618,"score_gpt":0.2680728755047601,"score_spread":0.25243632336519833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764021189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002305073,0.0045829215,0.00032540745,0.012048152,0.0022733107,0.000053697786,0.016388752,0.001336357,0.96068627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00374791,0.00077562203,0.0003358016,0.0005367018,0.000072329676,0.00001028135,0.0018782768,0.00017720021,0.992466],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990466,0.00006190407,0.000030480935,0.00014676113,0.00045664515,0.0002575819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967501,0.00040872357,0.00010064605,0.00013803704,0.0011149643,0.0014875437],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007266398,0.00094135135,0.0006954501,0.0034659686,0.0051440257,0.0062923287,0.0019994522,0.0030125738,0.753813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026042527,0.00082646863,0.00032407447,0.004219505,0.0009903054,0.0013464694,0.0016814563,0.0015492168,0.29703185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069751884,0.00004183862,0.00097349216,0.00012591311,0.000003286468,0.00024831874,0.00019053789,0.00010510987,0.000100922414,0.0044027492,0.9102995,0.08343856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019617157,0.000006695139,0.0018379856,0.00009606972,0.0000036952215,0.000078673336,0.00045514858,0.00010042877,0.000083456,0.000846489,0.9964611,0.000010602128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7322282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8741112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.753813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012450973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027819788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5386975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764021245","doi":"","title":"McGill University publications ; Series 16. Law.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03730927672712027,"score_gpt":0.29049258786748944,"score_spread":0.2531833111403692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764021245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045730572,0.027116189,0.0012455167,0.0057879305,0.0010478907,0.00007074292,0.021602063,0.0014571699,0.9412151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021874455,0.005743908,0.00067797414,0.00059043255,0.0002082361,0.000052108797,0.0021281983,0.0004680373,0.98794365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987618,0.000115560644,0.00008255731,0.00016569819,0.0007412888,0.00013319406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961653,0.0009665486,0.0003046614,0.00044869535,0.001478173,0.0006365568],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010187828,0.0013598256,0.00093385106,0.005352862,0.002210347,0.0050338707,0.0018963485,0.0021070542,0.5415369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053154086,0.0016282164,0.00041237354,0.01035432,0.0013042557,0.004702227,0.0014033321,0.0023019516,0.25372085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011009538,0.000010858839,0.00009787534,0.00012441313,0.0000017905154,0.00002294893,0.000081708524,0.0000557829,0.000099643425,0.0067579187,0.9364197,0.056316365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004502496,0.0000054554966,0.0010020392,0.00017121194,0.0000028298534,0.000030695468,0.00007450209,0.00004466914,0.00009283675,0.0017587013,0.9968047,0.000007756176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26070234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6043499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5415369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073566404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008972594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6539419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765075077","doi":"10.29173/alr345","title":"Regulation and the Legal Profession","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Closing (real estate); Salient; Law; Legal profession; Political science; Wish; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.047323590499521985,"score_gpt":0.3853597546560687,"score_spread":0.3380361641565467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765075077","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008413113,0.048216563,0.0020912653,0.79975814,0.0022780127,0.000027347598,0.00001566629,0.000040609073,0.13915925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54712677,0.044274807,0.0015533799,0.31679887,0.0048159966,0.000157593,0.000038336533,0.000052366955,0.0851819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820556,0.008980524,0.00027670246,0.0014470379,0.004423614,0.0028164925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866127,0.0077829543,0.0011243054,0.0006440176,0.0022794984,0.0015565975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014043431,0.00020805838,0.00043411524,0.0012755624,0.0075259195,0.008853366,0.0014273981,0.011696983,0.008495239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017418394,0.00023981852,0.00049009814,0.0014469327,0.03039231,0.0052014,0.0029812101,0.010535034,0.0013893923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004349162,0.00002202196,0.00038362195,0.00007618034,0.000004147721,0.00006690968,0.0032532078,0.00013099628,0.00014401088,0.93983823,0.039461073,0.016615301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016951746,0.000028180697,0.0029245904,0.0005581506,0.00000735481,0.00009891909,0.0052806144,0.00025904897,0.00015832494,0.21915828,0.7714782,0.000031389725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08414343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06442782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08414343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021451348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03809006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16730732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765188031","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3184","title":"The Shifting Frontiers of Law: Access to Justice and Underemployment in the Legal Profession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Economic Justice; Underemployment; Work (physics); Legal service; Practice of law; Legislature; Law; Political science; Legal research; Legal ethics; Legal realism; Public relations; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Unemployment; Engineering; Economic growth","score_opus":0.10992780347808831,"score_gpt":0.45555795241220215,"score_spread":0.3456301489341138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765188031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7219775,0.0046560867,0.0019500593,0.17151198,0.00022087785,0.00002752278,0.00006173692,0.000019495275,0.09957478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99379116,0.00089731324,0.0001514274,0.0027051885,0.00008219613,0.0000055544615,0.0000072900557,0.0000044837407,0.0023552661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475205,0.0012952555,0.0001087268,0.0003283738,0.0013005147,0.0022150492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901286,0.0031328148,0.0013040418,0.00022453902,0.0008562929,0.004353764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032510695,0.000114990595,0.00031477568,0.0021986575,0.014075878,0.009102129,0.0012411932,0.002585692,0.0085013695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012611511,0.00016836819,0.00020393268,0.0022482388,0.025966497,0.007501264,0.010176154,0.004316778,0.0003301011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000645494,0.00031688903,0.099466495,0.00013871185,0.000017022412,0.0020985196,0.31787905,0.00031867737,0.00065226824,0.47759855,0.010205314,0.09124394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022755323,0.00011231818,0.13175546,0.0006262939,0.000018271483,0.0010340601,0.6126959,0.00081993506,0.00030842275,0.15403341,0.09850304,0.00007018712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28916225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40952617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7108377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015716473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026185416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57495826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765332678","doi":"","title":"Closed Shops: Opening Canada’s Legal Profession to Foreign-educated Lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.06088439717625059,"score_gpt":0.4343394299676561,"score_spread":0.3734550327914055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765332678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40925077,0.0024569551,0.0033867816,0.18784423,0.0044974666,0.00052369805,0.0008212107,0.00069412467,0.39052477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7859728,0.0006777498,0.002671122,0.019882198,0.0004409258,0.00013001476,0.00030010313,0.00020108832,0.189724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995195,0.0005495383,0.000031511478,0.00033441087,0.0008844792,0.0030051062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97768056,0.0015689096,0.000349391,0.0004585896,0.0015860937,0.018356338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026035628,0.0003905078,0.00032438265,0.001314443,0.036446746,0.015694277,0.0034807043,0.006969209,0.050773438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008710977,0.0005897684,0.00074561994,0.0015878319,0.010116712,0.006185054,0.010878083,0.009087428,0.00319854],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030959185,0.0010401773,0.023542333,0.00012642518,0.000021980988,0.0028826767,0.10527128,0.00038210352,0.0012375468,0.07617991,0.6098465,0.17915945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010221151,0.00021286667,0.034492675,0.00034511182,0.000025873946,0.00034962388,0.2223952,0.0005729062,0.0004289617,0.009368091,0.7315954,0.00011112216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8393739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9738298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0456708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17707308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33136642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765455907","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2017.15740abstract","title":"The Illusion of Innovation at Canadian Law Firms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Law; Commercial law; Resistance (ecology); Illusion; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.05840745842487627,"score_gpt":0.3767125350782692,"score_spread":0.3183050766533929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765455907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7047162,0.0016902592,0.0033194562,0.035322074,0.00007594559,0.00020451074,0.001928767,0.00009593968,0.2526468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920739,0.00065567094,0.0009878319,0.0011679896,0.000013067346,0.00003766974,0.00017920569,0.000011054887,0.0048737302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96727407,0.0051020994,0.00082580146,0.0019012346,0.020576084,0.0043207384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94169545,0.024463085,0.0058671692,0.004193563,0.020526791,0.0032538876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014756713,0.0002975216,0.00056241715,0.0079919975,0.018513516,0.019447671,0.0019095115,0.0022710443,0.004039499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046657007,0.0004683966,0.0002980923,0.01549728,0.021194156,0.007244733,0.006592738,0.0035361215,0.00024241119],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002237052,0.00014900045,0.15510978,0.0005232765,0.000065342145,0.0009282316,0.20364541,0.0016763544,0.002460944,0.50207233,0.013216125,0.11992963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051174276,0.00021674224,0.26555976,0.0013531634,0.0001284518,0.00044389148,0.2824768,0.004611132,0.0040415875,0.074775495,0.3659023,0.00043954875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96876186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9783278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18293299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18293299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12708364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9476819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765588717","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017r-0012","title":"The definitive article","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Statute; Jurisdiction; Institution; Criminal jurisdiction; Criminal code; Criminal procedure; Sociology","score_opus":0.03692326805195515,"score_gpt":0.3321777794202439,"score_spread":0.29525451136828873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765588717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083438284,0.009543811,0.0012359198,0.052697815,0.085353814,0.00024094271,0.0030081628,0.00045804415,0.84662706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065992926,0.006721203,0.0010233814,0.02739193,0.014027696,0.000141942,0.0028068784,0.000275685,0.94101197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978586,0.00030311267,0.00011523086,0.00040034382,0.0010558183,0.00026689892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545884,0.0006991357,0.00020410762,0.0008667929,0.0019396022,0.00083152077],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020098274,0.00049485744,0.0006407858,0.0015328367,0.0025344566,0.0075752875,0.0016673458,0.0054071564,0.46080503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010453863,0.00036822332,0.00085901393,0.0013613098,0.0016151905,0.004030471,0.0027217346,0.0039477125,0.25833756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017484734,0.00002563309,0.00014180821,0.00014920007,0.0000050763374,0.000055798588,0.000048123275,0.00002289714,0.000118192205,0.023108704,0.94023526,0.03607186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034447564,0.000005688908,0.00013921884,0.000079066805,0.0000019829,0.000034882567,0.000040096784,0.000007883254,0.00005264228,0.0014637855,0.9981686,0.000002683063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046301708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064736484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46080503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00292606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063476046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7690962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765613774","doi":"","title":"Away from the Library","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Library science; Law library; World Wide Web; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.028858480997189222,"score_gpt":0.3569756296922953,"score_spread":0.32811714869510605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765613774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005442879,0.006822369,0.0037812404,0.40759438,0.010036551,0.000056920322,0.00041891198,0.0010590506,0.56478775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058536857,0.0048766993,0.0024662958,0.18603024,0.0018906607,0.000066512934,0.00029509756,0.0009400132,0.7448976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99292314,0.002228085,0.00029476316,0.0011025494,0.002586688,0.000864842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915624,0.0010732284,0.00044604432,0.0012811148,0.0024880194,0.0031491308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033142793,0.0006568109,0.00066797144,0.001425653,0.014199587,0.019859387,0.0015711781,0.005474794,0.11956296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015368862,0.0004745805,0.00067468156,0.0016579096,0.011862133,0.022256646,0.012358442,0.015620456,0.07240879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028091372,0.00003973452,0.0006363544,0.0001417887,0.000011464624,0.0002157978,0.009382133,0.000026369476,0.0003093998,0.1246782,0.8262044,0.03832616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003958261,0.000008477316,0.00021825037,0.00013931014,0.0000028250565,0.00013236342,0.004257308,0.0000096636495,0.00007174656,0.0044626035,0.99068165,0.0000117474065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024256738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03683588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11956296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006883872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012444659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39997792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765618201","doi":"","title":"Towards a new Canada: a research study prepared for the Canadian Bar Foundation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Bar (unit); Political science; Geography; Law; Meteorology","score_opus":0.11934160004128153,"score_gpt":0.40114983176004687,"score_spread":0.28180823171876535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765618201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49686298,0.010149917,0.0010505739,0.26065207,0.0017173907,0.0015290275,0.007722611,0.00006378459,0.22025171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77606905,0.01026939,0.00328581,0.030350255,0.00016660705,0.0007705177,0.001764561,0.00010259528,0.1772212],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964933,0.000403502,0.00006825577,0.00024265189,0.0014030155,0.0013892311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99248075,0.00082741544,0.00022592016,0.0001024887,0.003869073,0.0024943012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031528969,0.00033169703,0.0005415582,0.0028052216,0.03884114,0.011477293,0.0017661714,0.002744941,0.016919196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081549445,0.0005645238,0.0004351008,0.008298717,0.0041819164,0.004405608,0.0033441894,0.0062006777,0.0007440187],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021452743,0.0006209386,0.07994814,0.00072969205,0.000054947537,0.0016071675,0.20290798,0.0005172012,0.00079475937,0.09970027,0.5268846,0.086019784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034394954,0.0000687441,0.080841206,0.00052680523,0.000051308092,0.00012519083,0.5506478,0.00025387667,0.00034598814,0.0017019595,0.36528662,0.000116171694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99904746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.814435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.185565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40086192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9446292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766068022","doi":"","title":"Canadian bar journal.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.023277272298617403,"score_gpt":0.29376104982113793,"score_spread":0.2704837775225205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766068022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020139175,0.0049969545,0.0000878784,0.005260888,0.0026763175,0.000033420598,0.003658567,0.00026793208,0.9828166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012039103,0.002825892,0.0001368448,0.0013304468,0.00028620986,0.000012411243,0.0010089518,0.00014271533,0.99305254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991025,0.000026450458,0.000028461354,0.00010046899,0.00058199756,0.00016007335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831533,0.00009647365,0.000045389625,0.000092263916,0.0010124877,0.0004381222],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041000205,0.0012376604,0.0007628338,0.003253702,0.006182217,0.0061637727,0.0015591246,0.0034902126,0.72839075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022733049,0.000873473,0.00058648974,0.004918854,0.0010009363,0.0021325226,0.00189775,0.002842907,0.5943522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005631934,0.000007883919,0.00007164921,0.00003905279,8.963687e-7,0.000023910974,0.000016318034,0.000009168807,0.000022837477,0.0018393513,0.96707225,0.030890934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020063278,0.0000010846245,0.00030372842,0.000045237124,9.554311e-7,0.000027026723,0.00004247661,0.000009339848,0.0000137291845,0.000216742,0.9993337,0.0000039099746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59268594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82993716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72839075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008053104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018695623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81942564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766161557","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3188","title":"Tension and Reconciliation in Canadian Contract Law Casebooks","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto","funders":"Foundation for Research, Science and Technology","keywords":"Casebook; Allegiance; Law; Jurisprudence; Legal realism; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Legal profession; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06166480620072193,"score_gpt":0.37499230456749283,"score_spread":0.3133274983667709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766161557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16165252,0.006966136,0.009706033,0.089746475,0.002128359,0.00045963854,0.0007073003,0.00037396973,0.72825956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8290851,0.0027642425,0.012262732,0.00876969,0.00032020867,0.0003419501,0.00065383833,0.00030489295,0.14549728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831276,0.0046330895,0.000773975,0.0013613006,0.007664571,0.002439374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96347046,0.020802654,0.0016191254,0.002467026,0.009002938,0.0026377593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01532116,0.00048450695,0.00051014725,0.010540498,0.030243482,0.023098746,0.0054086386,0.00488262,0.010975953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0626265,0.00087739434,0.00046451823,0.012670066,0.024432221,0.008198697,0.009595,0.00667132,0.00071510125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015125289,0.00002520604,0.0006978046,0.00008081647,0.0000052224464,0.00079726725,0.08480251,0.0004893383,0.00019964116,0.8208298,0.06284426,0.029212985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011345395,0.000011295777,0.0021168701,0.00027791745,0.000010295246,0.00024775154,0.049258545,0.00055899227,0.0003246613,0.03598181,0.9111195,0.00008099869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74975234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8739259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25024766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.120909914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09951018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87726694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766541327","doi":"","title":"One man's opposition to individualism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management today/Management Today","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Individualism; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03909466322105639,"score_gpt":0.3330916831059343,"score_spread":0.2939970198848779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766541327","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004867594,0.00725376,0.00086162623,0.83183175,0.0033413924,0.000005792112,0.000031063304,0.0000318702,0.15177521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5501088,0.009726178,0.0015129187,0.3132374,0.005043649,0.000029835363,0.000037829548,0.00020840252,0.12009495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937087,0.0022813138,0.00008695371,0.0007806662,0.0018228679,0.0013195201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897775,0.004017772,0.00039604443,0.0006895632,0.0031043028,0.002014711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006048118,0.00031198282,0.00058282947,0.0010482845,0.018299084,0.008241657,0.0014628571,0.0056064385,0.005933476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010853796,0.00022536563,0.0005111984,0.0011065713,0.049978923,0.0052934624,0.003076139,0.017133245,0.0008097994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021119984,0.000012738943,0.0003900805,0.00002400598,0.000008507471,0.00010328994,0.011335499,0.000048246715,0.00005419457,0.83120817,0.1484711,0.00832294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024469116,0.000015115322,0.0011143795,0.00023362975,0.000012324079,0.00018064148,0.01529347,0.0001524372,0.00013221789,0.29613551,0.6866627,0.00004303237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3610345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45799494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3610345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017102664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022093032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7178661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766691981","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3193","title":"Breakdown: The Inside Story of the Rise and Fall of Heenan Blaikie by Norman Bacal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Business; Corporate law; Big business; Market economy; Finance; Economics; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.028263170078823986,"score_gpt":0.3375230194862566,"score_spread":0.3092598494074326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766691981","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069658943,0.013651806,0.0004367682,0.85163695,0.009720161,0.00004366293,0.00021967679,0.000114503906,0.11721057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11540637,0.009185346,0.0007778744,0.46351635,0.0023850582,0.000055283126,0.00018428394,0.00039850702,0.4080909],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936713,0.0007795019,0.000092552786,0.00077432697,0.0027797048,0.0019026337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931465,0.0010456884,0.00022065728,0.00018339824,0.0024493383,0.0029543869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00314733,0.00071212935,0.00066541595,0.0014487844,0.050876092,0.012621918,0.0026778206,0.007896373,0.014720547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012165797,0.0007923114,0.0004547154,0.0014834245,0.015284163,0.0066750525,0.0048556915,0.028970452,0.0033104823],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020643954,0.00001232527,0.0004668438,0.000032164215,0.0000053872136,0.00035612914,0.011912939,0.00003410778,0.0001117917,0.024137774,0.9533525,0.009557287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003257148,0.0000067234255,0.001234425,0.00015121671,0.0000033918304,0.0001607365,0.01780076,0.00005219549,0.00008672762,0.0020470757,0.9784147,0.00003869396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9291591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9627444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9291591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047443926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06946901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34423137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767126759","doi":"","title":"Legal Education Society of Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.014554113429219043,"score_gpt":0.28544090404952577,"score_spread":0.27088679062030674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767126759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031229544,0.009878962,0.0004975196,0.030894896,0.0072200913,0.00008061863,0.0025636263,0.00063692953,0.9451044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004593774,0.0014643103,0.0003050574,0.0010437275,0.00014934239,0.000010896804,0.00042323527,0.000037521782,0.9919721],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998248,0.000089811845,0.000044374265,0.00020912352,0.00095022697,0.0004585533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960515,0.00024662688,0.00008575345,0.00016566858,0.0022837752,0.0011666357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012224772,0.0005741759,0.00036303315,0.0024851852,0.0058705625,0.006377878,0.0013700965,0.0031500328,0.28246713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029044985,0.00040249212,0.0003273595,0.002203998,0.0014256238,0.0010179994,0.0021024453,0.0022602193,0.054594673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023219385,0.00003082497,0.0007535777,0.00007197981,0.0000034073873,0.00019341914,0.00025183297,0.00010220545,0.00019436608,0.019509304,0.8946645,0.084201366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033277688,0.0000025116801,0.0013266593,0.000044724224,0.0000017319762,0.000034318473,0.00020757194,0.00004347435,0.00004898821,0.00049370504,0.9977894,0.0000037521845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81285465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9156356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28246713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01798104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08421023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94494665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768977335","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.12911000","title":"Modulating the Depth of Scrutiny in Judicial Review: Scope, Grounds, Intensity, Context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Home Office; University of Cambridge; McGill University","keywords":"Scrutiny; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Intensity (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Physics; Geography; Optics","score_opus":0.12879879954872597,"score_gpt":0.4039025690202341,"score_spread":0.2751037694715081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768977335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55964863,0.029737517,0.0776968,0.020366719,0.0014913111,0.0042094523,0.0015726695,0.0006444046,0.30463257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715949,0.0053475923,0.014980541,0.0016403358,0.00042346228,0.0006806638,0.00013836789,0.00009110226,0.0051030368],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727228,0.013311681,0.0028586485,0.0016640204,0.008242898,0.0011998831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9326597,0.05274347,0.006354989,0.0036748827,0.0035542145,0.0010126332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018318616,0.00038321762,0.0008381359,0.0017013274,0.0010837065,0.0051012724,0.0013509394,0.0028019273,0.009940867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07666733,0.00062543544,0.0010066672,0.0016977239,0.0027393028,0.0039551537,0.002936617,0.0017675305,0.0012652286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005811208,0.0012006364,0.038017794,0.0066381805,0.0006572554,0.00057054835,0.005215938,0.0056509348,0.11745407,0.25495535,0.013469723,0.5503584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030888538,0.018023852,0.21439414,0.0119177075,0.002709777,0.0017238754,0.0055916198,0.017733047,0.19802728,0.27513912,0.2507827,0.0008679915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008252092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026202556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018318616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025312307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030227234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096879244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770221322","doi":"","title":"Law Society of British Columbia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.016949149760183357,"score_gpt":0.2625923323770801,"score_spread":0.24564318261689672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770221322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003730471,0.0066930177,0.0003264188,0.01869976,0.0032019627,0.000112391215,0.012417094,0.0005201459,0.9542988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004587616,0.001159122,0.00014247106,0.0008339739,0.00005613629,0.000023851235,0.00090447144,0.000052216754,0.9922401],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863344,0.00008270895,0.000059085185,0.0002149046,0.00066916575,0.0003406879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99584204,0.00032507296,0.00011050161,0.00024661617,0.002886651,0.00058910146],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007510583,0.0005959518,0.0005420155,0.0028917305,0.0074982257,0.0062249517,0.0014056226,0.0027538508,0.30400038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004460369,0.0006209035,0.0003236944,0.0033967125,0.0010225528,0.0010759567,0.0014933201,0.0027884354,0.07298437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016083695,0.000014955311,0.0007138911,0.000094219075,0.000004277154,0.000114655035,0.00016222485,0.00007042443,0.000102002465,0.009214473,0.94729406,0.04219863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003148625,0.0000018421161,0.0024143741,0.00009495351,0.0000032701014,0.000027842898,0.0002347873,0.00006804816,0.000053972188,0.0004266432,0.996664,0.0000071241757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87576956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94164217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9810604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018939624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054534428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771049386","doi":"10.32396/usurj.v4i1.208","title":"Defying the Law of the Land: The Lawyer's Role in Civil Disobedience in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Law; Political science; Charter; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.05109549803766935,"score_gpt":0.3363507936708601,"score_spread":0.2852552956331908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771049386","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35889912,0.00830105,0.0015741669,0.4403529,0.0015141389,0.00031413801,0.00023770153,0.000096495925,0.18871032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9077851,0.0036210578,0.0011051156,0.042142082,0.00015080231,0.000053362717,0.00006207457,0.00007528199,0.04500501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865052,0.0017983428,0.0002740885,0.0010275003,0.00317486,0.00721991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692852,0.007643604,0.0010180863,0.00041026497,0.0062556807,0.015387166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065990896,0.0002874827,0.0005723428,0.0017936478,0.07181305,0.020976366,0.0046968493,0.010496532,0.01159733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026745329,0.0009251627,0.0005096603,0.002705393,0.018577868,0.0040870565,0.008345528,0.015360681,0.00039790056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003358334,0.0006206969,0.060122617,0.00053452386,0.00013906532,0.009650342,0.16337103,0.001495461,0.0021068896,0.41529736,0.22677033,0.11955588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017300017,0.00018786479,0.07892142,0.0012636984,0.00018979344,0.0013392938,0.30206066,0.0035212794,0.0016657356,0.031658135,0.5785273,0.00049176265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99523455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23863119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23863119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4501958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8830799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771157014","doi":"","title":"Clinical and Experiential Learning in Canadian Law Schools: Current Perspectives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Experiential learning; Curriculum; Experiential education; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Medicine","score_opus":0.05597736251240538,"score_gpt":0.3791980533069322,"score_spread":0.3232206907945268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771157014","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16432038,0.07314057,0.0023734984,0.47715324,0.0013082534,0.00014724399,0.00044625523,0.00010826838,0.28100228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9394287,0.026503284,0.0019562843,0.0150947,0.00027267283,0.00005211333,0.00018442755,0.000023312303,0.016484473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98667043,0.0029935164,0.00034871948,0.0008558404,0.0047090827,0.0044224323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96947867,0.0059525855,0.0013063643,0.0004943821,0.011954274,0.010813624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013328992,0.0004393696,0.00049997616,0.0038469173,0.02500725,0.014817789,0.00408376,0.003358099,0.009295911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016170502,0.00038902563,0.00037503993,0.008019421,0.023716284,0.004529485,0.0066494634,0.004512658,0.00031502158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009391453,0.00038860584,0.021740153,0.0016511623,0.00002778421,0.00086124835,0.22714902,0.0007455585,0.0006298045,0.37762645,0.08904959,0.28003675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022622935,0.000075992095,0.032439407,0.0018004508,0.00003074841,0.0002227514,0.42486134,0.0005803593,0.00040633976,0.019975755,0.5194755,0.00010868499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99218166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80687004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19312996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39203346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9358549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771168711","doi":"","title":"Law Reform Commission of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025196262303403983,"score_gpt":0.30030910762818436,"score_spread":0.27511284532478036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771168711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008270935,0.010196882,0.00067701814,0.152425,0.0068475245,0.00053186814,0.01491087,0.0007021939,0.8054376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019679395,0.0022196828,0.00065173785,0.016426712,0.00034740163,0.00012927012,0.0013925935,0.000120971294,0.9590321],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037266,0.00032774507,0.00021630278,0.0008182297,0.005702193,0.0025628821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98747694,0.0008481574,0.00019751805,0.0004822825,0.009285389,0.0017097194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026701828,0.00075153226,0.0011351088,0.0047329604,0.019417368,0.012499372,0.0024897002,0.008674744,0.07247574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010800399,0.0012085916,0.0009783617,0.0043544923,0.0022720464,0.0021084493,0.0021000418,0.007906196,0.008481806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023973944,0.00003653645,0.00078446674,0.00007025828,0.000011747653,0.00008939944,0.0002730631,0.00010651698,0.00011437439,0.06608809,0.9210141,0.01138747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001844715,0.000005823228,0.0030437715,0.00008232766,0.00001501135,0.000019148425,0.00029855134,0.0001587128,0.00013303869,0.0015128078,0.9946878,0.000024657462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.991015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99484825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8847014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11529864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39420977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8365541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771611331","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5012","title":"ENHANCING THE LEGAL PROFESSION’S CAPACITY FOR INNOVATION: THE PROMISE OF REFLECTIVE PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH FOR INCREASING ACCESS TO JUSTICE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Enabling; Economic Justice; Sociology; Public relations; Action (physics); Action research; Legal profession; Reflective practice; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.38929909219707365,"score_gpt":0.5793227361091744,"score_spread":0.19002364391210075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771611331","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022089921,0.030263612,0.13036665,0.6984247,0.0022397647,0.0005159586,0.000045051205,0.0004498713,0.11560444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67571837,0.031641085,0.21693365,0.062180445,0.002385078,0.0015430489,0.000066568326,0.00028916184,0.00924267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.82434744,0.14898716,0.0025294246,0.0058587976,0.013618196,0.004658922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61174977,0.33445287,0.008032794,0.026179552,0.007850479,0.01173452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14600545,0.0010716813,0.0012852864,0.004115689,0.012778898,0.03170804,0.0054515135,0.01435722,0.0055079106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13558517,0.0009820448,0.0016908186,0.002384961,0.10023804,0.04545714,0.028480923,0.01641969,0.0018964048],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054047803,0.00035425325,0.0018343573,0.0018980483,0.000059595295,0.0004805938,0.10037727,0.0008154039,0.0008003635,0.71876276,0.013479158,0.16108419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007020856,0.00017316997,0.00073055224,0.0038730332,0.00003092848,0.00041494833,0.0338177,0.0014031325,0.0010063848,0.79519796,0.16316149,0.00012054894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034112418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004843272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14600545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012050628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050485685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7721599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771776238","doi":"","title":"Canadian Law Information Council","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Information governance; Information system","score_opus":0.027517769853713858,"score_gpt":0.25686033577029693,"score_spread":0.22934256591658309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771776238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004907117,0.001723926,0.0004539595,0.0144930715,0.00144982,0.00029967914,0.019383306,0.0008651089,0.96084046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013375157,0.0007862346,0.00041572124,0.0019902012,0.00010151705,0.000072786795,0.0037888796,0.00016006906,0.991347],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877043,0.0003897648,0.00042566375,0.00076510163,0.009231163,0.0014840161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676385,0.0025864912,0.00047209387,0.0021543826,0.025056286,0.0020922015],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047407723,0.0012967724,0.0019337559,0.013562787,0.017050454,0.015135227,0.0040670387,0.007026379,0.45835486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024686014,0.0021463975,0.0012823006,0.014289776,0.0024898848,0.003403874,0.0028655,0.005634535,0.18633732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007277307,0.00001585014,0.00011440357,0.0000486973,0.0000020206328,0.000018854202,0.000060333783,0.0000354592,0.00002953728,0.008847348,0.97818106,0.012639169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038233543,0.0000016639245,0.0005680282,0.00005709517,0.0000034143532,0.0000066657085,0.000071130264,0.000063594176,0.00003829823,0.0006356041,0.99854016,0.000010394929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9557583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97323406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94618356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05381642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21884058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77259105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771900612","doi":"","title":"British Columbia. Office of Legislative Counsel.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biography | US Enciclopedia of law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.03762762614914859,"score_gpt":0.3421431484946045,"score_spread":0.30451552234545587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771900612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012545048,0.009958635,0.00024022508,0.027579451,0.0034848717,0.00012532544,0.049672537,0.00071020663,0.9069742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031494896,0.0021701106,0.00019471871,0.0030685863,0.00009631364,0.000065383894,0.0030852007,0.00013680875,0.9880334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986551,0.000086698805,0.00007837755,0.00018256898,0.00062910985,0.00036828616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969447,0.00039136375,0.000119679215,0.0001510102,0.0019303424,0.00046276773],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079290284,0.00086102495,0.0008459827,0.0022275988,0.0064454456,0.0043672393,0.0026027767,0.004900332,0.40164453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035183008,0.0010578149,0.00038239287,0.005752774,0.00095132075,0.0016104699,0.0012100852,0.0045661246,0.16180937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011871087,0.000009900293,0.00023548944,0.000059435984,0.0000021734081,0.000030606785,0.000055831,0.00002359875,0.000033267577,0.002946827,0.9800797,0.016511263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059996783,0.00000163045,0.0019423625,0.00012695706,0.0000040188766,0.000011326863,0.000227535,0.000029853043,0.000046799552,0.0002834856,0.9973115,0.000008529214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9159242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9543785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98560417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014395806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04201042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8534815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W277316432","doi":"","title":"The Legal Profession's Rule against Vouching for Clients: Advocacy and the Manner That Is the Man Himself","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexive pronoun; Law; Legal profession; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029615537775921498,"score_gpt":0.34568980406126765,"score_spread":0.31607426628534613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W277316432","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047330543,0.004889189,0.017483069,0.47785604,0.0020510564,0.00005235149,0.000028654777,0.00011759476,0.45019153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8870562,0.001070178,0.0056319255,0.063170776,0.0014472218,0.000111129826,0.000011244338,0.00007739578,0.041423958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855641,0.0074329525,0.00044123974,0.0015118388,0.0036043124,0.001445573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896394,0.0062110405,0.0007964372,0.0007246147,0.00123557,0.0013929828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012562966,0.00026328827,0.0004635226,0.0008532168,0.0140695665,0.010872277,0.0016587244,0.020407598,0.00277076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024415648,0.0004947928,0.00044807934,0.0005508901,0.052599967,0.007443544,0.0046186387,0.017633418,0.0010971344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066902608,0.000013166023,0.00032750767,0.000011483018,0.0000019778392,0.00006915346,0.007871935,0.000022833987,0.00008170757,0.97827095,0.009513156,0.0038094937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044220895,0.0000490958,0.0010170215,0.00026895647,0.000015414698,0.00038903256,0.008235279,0.00064544415,0.00040396737,0.7223179,0.26656878,0.000045031276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014934069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019881016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020407598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004743718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012402863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066440105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773284514","doi":"","title":"British Columbia. Ministry of Attorney General.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02537539139168143,"score_gpt":0.3028022861278623,"score_spread":0.2774268947361809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773284514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002433407,0.009417916,0.00020168255,0.04627474,0.0050798673,0.00020044883,0.11974579,0.0011054229,0.81554073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058220383,0.0025378147,0.00020431478,0.004132112,0.00014455047,0.00006236766,0.008223269,0.0002089592,0.9786645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986834,0.00006001601,0.00007240238,0.00014122721,0.0005518409,0.00049118715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967961,0.00023693968,0.00010369249,0.00011669383,0.0019872952,0.0007593112],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058018434,0.00068880594,0.0007451845,0.0023110393,0.0031981086,0.0029579296,0.00201188,0.0038894706,0.44429445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029284342,0.00072586816,0.0004292103,0.003912773,0.0005995655,0.0010581888,0.0012346273,0.0035205618,0.13703774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022776952,0.000013057406,0.00046479783,0.00006828125,0.0000028843072,0.00003754948,0.000023612878,0.000024150308,0.000023868926,0.0014159975,0.9810388,0.016864184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015072428,0.0000036514464,0.004751474,0.00014892333,0.000005869419,0.000020819836,0.00020532808,0.000053166932,0.000041591273,0.00029009135,0.9944523,0.000011734478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94590753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9654647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97906464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02093536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047481295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7926465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773833023","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Foundation.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Foundation (evidence); Geology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029805595098598106,"score_gpt":0.32028748656830236,"score_spread":0.29048189146970427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773833023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017143984,0.0018955843,0.00017266472,0.0066432715,0.001755441,0.00005845655,0.011768115,0.0006032588,0.97693187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011707298,0.0008252453,0.00022532439,0.0011558462,0.00009188685,0.000022621696,0.0024330313,0.00016505347,0.9939102],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769574,0.00008127042,0.000059851656,0.00021675852,0.001487247,0.00045915798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99601257,0.00023443208,0.00009640848,0.00023263256,0.00250152,0.00092244084],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092456874,0.0011700117,0.0009150442,0.0036957997,0.0055641676,0.004929207,0.0024066782,0.004145722,0.8046912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042874548,0.0011077098,0.00074002624,0.0032949036,0.0010088687,0.0013617546,0.0026149747,0.0028144831,0.5784553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013503526,0.00001136248,0.00008699259,0.000042990923,0.0000015257369,0.000023124812,0.000019616175,0.000018852315,0.000022850321,0.0038186556,0.95981514,0.036125477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005232686,0.0000024138662,0.0003480492,0.000052695716,0.0000017415832,0.000017881684,0.000037927035,0.000026230236,0.000017023245,0.00043174913,0.999054,0.000005147097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75580764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8785476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8046912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013252115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033744592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4912609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774161793","doi":"","title":"Ontario Law Reform Commission","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Political science; Law reform","score_opus":0.040034209006459,"score_gpt":0.3211548533897665,"score_spread":0.2811206443833075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774161793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037051789,0.0025970463,0.00029058658,0.05677601,0.0018146929,0.0003572819,0.0057236566,0.00025549706,0.9284802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0052970108,0.0005564828,0.00023512727,0.0049512926,0.00014526375,0.00007886751,0.0005523703,0.000053241307,0.98813045],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913948,0.00035726352,0.00019794838,0.00061909563,0.0055991635,0.0018316846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99102986,0.0006944643,0.00019388861,0.0005058492,0.0063913483,0.001184532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026653062,0.0006956742,0.00086840626,0.003953882,0.01761027,0.010315814,0.0018945903,0.0070145223,0.19570911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009355471,0.001309809,0.00088750094,0.0037574337,0.0024196012,0.0025152578,0.002403139,0.004853254,0.030796979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019788127,0.00002238464,0.0006120776,0.00004633161,0.0000066096027,0.000060385413,0.00028611958,0.00004985768,0.000063001185,0.037597775,0.95263255,0.008603116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013124398,0.000003027598,0.0017345218,0.000036984427,0.0000066179796,0.000011813789,0.00020936866,0.000065158216,0.000057214686,0.0010184259,0.9968329,0.000010841231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95428014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91309786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08690215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2081809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6547122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774264718","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5011","title":"READING LAW AND IMAGINING JUSTICE IN THE WAHKOHTOWIN CLASSROOM","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Injustice; Sociology; Indigenous; Law; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Reading (process); Class (philosophy); Political science","score_opus":0.09807585211070377,"score_gpt":0.44257968607187576,"score_spread":0.344503833961172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774264718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8669382,0.00138422,0.0015388314,0.009070028,0.00026890688,0.00008547502,0.000046297362,0.00006058283,0.12060755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97266454,0.0013810776,0.001548374,0.0014633756,0.000030879077,0.000070424336,0.000050054285,0.00003987819,0.022751441],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835134,0.0005422004,0.000032829885,0.00018468282,0.00015607229,0.0007329356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988933,0.00034609745,0.00008810611,0.000071761526,0.00007961979,0.0005210841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015891857,0.0007260643,0.00048093978,0.0011323473,0.01770674,0.0092461165,0.0013951934,0.0024064803,0.0061833244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017120481,0.00050152454,0.00030814586,0.0009476443,0.022556253,0.005633213,0.0067501003,0.0047901566,0.00078489486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037519854,0.00043867977,0.008412625,0.0001618523,0.000015341831,0.002274939,0.8976502,0.00018067157,0.004119526,0.051416002,0.00952027,0.0257725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015382173,0.000055557342,0.008334731,0.00022269801,0.000009645344,0.00027808966,0.88619673,0.00010718726,0.0005407817,0.0112858405,0.092924125,0.000029229623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16828963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46083364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83171034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012431305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019106178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33462018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775009932","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association. Council","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biography | US Enciclopedia of law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Association (psychology); Political science; Geography; Psychology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.04254611569307873,"score_gpt":0.2979418958035783,"score_spread":0.25539578011049957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775009932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002309111,0.0012451025,0.000100784986,0.009434146,0.00354693,0.00006310531,0.0027640567,0.00035600935,0.98225904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00046841352,0.00018666743,0.000046805428,0.0012572043,0.000118147065,0.000011902721,0.0002830117,0.000062748986,0.99756515],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742883,0.000091610935,0.00005334219,0.00026385195,0.0015812347,0.00058102567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949208,0.000330124,0.00010345053,0.00034128394,0.0031664,0.0011379728],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010204318,0.0010646457,0.0011054345,0.0035439883,0.01042885,0.0063203303,0.0022882877,0.0067370622,0.7571335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048571825,0.0011649865,0.00089134916,0.0038201022,0.0013291131,0.0018307188,0.002448987,0.004810348,0.5647093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008272437,0.000010741051,0.00006940385,0.000021811042,9.746984e-7,0.000012132891,0.000015500353,0.000012241971,0.000016767422,0.0018963034,0.9855393,0.012396504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038484272,0.0000014930407,0.0002583042,0.000021631917,0.0000012267359,0.000005118839,0.00003444723,0.000015103773,0.00001011651,0.0001848827,0.9994604,0.000003347426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64851815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8592657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7571335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010897424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03340675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7071036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775176152","doi":"","title":"CanLII: Canadian Legal Information Institute","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.020433465560810157,"score_gpt":0.2797283325352385,"score_spread":0.25929486697442833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775176152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034797398,0.0047286223,0.0002974682,0.01120211,0.0011828401,0.00008652073,0.01713158,0.0014632248,0.9635597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022539352,0.0031847437,0.0005167513,0.000912105,0.0001399216,0.000044981305,0.004574032,0.00028263216,0.988091],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542576,0.00007996197,0.000107722044,0.00027664797,0.0034125384,0.0006973881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918853,0.00045092264,0.00015486282,0.00043213504,0.0058178245,0.001258892],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018412934,0.001599044,0.0014600703,0.011020923,0.013273976,0.017898701,0.003031574,0.0039164266,0.47782317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008458846,0.0012431856,0.00075177976,0.018261777,0.002364723,0.0058910293,0.0025915327,0.0038729876,0.1830935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035555317,0.0000058114883,0.0000889151,0.000036978683,0.0000010120864,0.000010855747,0.00005034403,0.000024422961,0.000014615195,0.005909552,0.9734489,0.020405062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015205563,9.717389e-7,0.00046225614,0.000055193515,0.0000018931427,0.0000064655856,0.00009476413,0.000042888325,0.00003470044,0.00075547764,0.9985359,0.000008110093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96358424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9216387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07836129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19946541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7448219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775333733","doi":"","title":"Canadian cases in the philosophy of law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04781008127696588,"score_gpt":0.31461487081770145,"score_spread":0.26680478954073555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775333733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032705003,0.026451478,0.0014544224,0.10661392,0.0015459148,0.000035879926,0.00037929532,0.00009907077,0.8601495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35926962,0.04180437,0.0040957956,0.028050084,0.0016901137,0.00008535345,0.00041394206,0.00020729154,0.5643834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532384,0.0006662913,0.000101603444,0.00035393977,0.0023662099,0.001188212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996831,0.00090062775,0.00011303288,0.00016903995,0.001435956,0.0005503881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026585094,0.0007384736,0.0004260797,0.0040725893,0.017346786,0.011828733,0.0021506944,0.0056295577,0.023084097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008079315,0.00072962046,0.0004275897,0.006803397,0.022470608,0.0048922393,0.0020299358,0.006397298,0.0014702205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003265079,0.000005162168,0.00010817655,0.000035220808,0.0000016510802,0.000038738166,0.0016408528,0.00013498479,0.000026688895,0.82702374,0.16342127,0.00756021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069112907,0.0000027606711,0.00095033745,0.00019228291,0.00000762455,0.000049344766,0.0019058944,0.0002693772,0.00006688544,0.087283686,0.9092389,0.000025975625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99490106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18654221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18654221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22563848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94349575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775375763","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5010","title":"COLLABORATIVE POLICY-MAKING, LAW STUDENTS, AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE: THE REWARDS OF DESTABILIZING INSTITUTIONAL PATTERNS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social justice; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Public defender; Law; Public relations; Law and economics; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.09752159562412278,"score_gpt":0.4991703045752187,"score_spread":0.40164870895109595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775375763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8700614,0.000402502,0.00449165,0.036690958,0.00017841332,0.00012362054,0.0000679183,0.00005752146,0.08792601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99423486,0.00012246895,0.00075909786,0.0010999944,0.00001310688,0.000051904415,0.000012216607,0.000020378116,0.0036858607],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9694017,0.02205368,0.00051109673,0.0020985703,0.002207781,0.003727118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96933866,0.013683402,0.0021480492,0.005027284,0.002296197,0.007506529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021759827,0.00033896053,0.0005336608,0.0016966187,0.034566917,0.028542973,0.0027082632,0.0033229096,0.008300814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035970025,0.0004788239,0.00032077896,0.002698375,0.04817417,0.009928344,0.03397998,0.0072889565,0.00062879507],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093865834,0.00038374378,0.026489386,0.0000825047,0.000036503094,0.00066915865,0.7063062,0.00044986903,0.00093727047,0.218669,0.0066806637,0.039201807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005998246,0.000091562426,0.011224666,0.0001943823,0.000025811276,0.0001457455,0.8258468,0.0006733441,0.0007407556,0.06978951,0.091135204,0.00007225295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11204698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2325044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88795304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02669259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046865974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22278959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775639172","doi":"","title":"C.L.E.S.N.S. index: index to Continuing Legal Education Society of Nova Scotia publications to December 1993","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Index (typography); Nova (rocket); Political science; Geography; Engineering; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02292982789363606,"score_gpt":0.31716247510549045,"score_spread":0.2942326472118544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775639172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013978416,0.021629462,0.00033797653,0.006965829,0.0027516042,0.000091146816,0.009013546,0.00060771115,0.95720494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046579163,0.006397914,0.0001710094,0.00060700177,0.00021401775,0.000025069421,0.0012248345,0.00008173031,0.98662055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979204,0.000008519028,0.0000063210423,0.00002492189,0.00011219895,0.000056032186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992335,0.000072553026,0.000026813634,0.000027021566,0.00048486798,0.00015538276],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014054336,0.0006325292,0.0004413402,0.0023832086,0.0019071021,0.0016843306,0.00062551297,0.00069382694,0.45495155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014369758,0.00021822126,0.00016787637,0.0034654285,0.00043579566,0.0008910096,0.00063651026,0.00071138015,0.24341212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009454101,0.000004497527,0.00016631302,0.0000669921,7.117241e-7,0.000020206848,0.00004435464,0.000019727768,0.000105698455,0.00060855574,0.976542,0.022411488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021012668,0.0000044094813,0.0034692637,0.00013451019,0.0000020806283,0.000044624314,0.000085153144,0.000028774195,0.000054305685,0.0001700078,0.99600005,0.000004783102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52087307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.756265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47912693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005790836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004560207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9638972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776254019","doi":"","title":"Court of Appeal for Ontario","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049438034363779984,"score_gpt":0.352817163533141,"score_spread":0.30337912916936105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776254019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013943037,0.0030257008,0.00051790103,0.21509068,0.006881267,0.0011252218,0.004917512,0.00029305954,0.75420564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026741311,0.00088529295,0.00029545178,0.09647562,0.0010565943,0.00048399772,0.0005004052,0.00009245538,0.8734689],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927844,0.0002657776,0.00020587236,0.00087744306,0.002459855,0.0034065845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535227,0.001000654,0.000120612545,0.00021390658,0.0023545597,0.0009579901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002466252,0.0012620155,0.0020073443,0.002206474,0.035969157,0.009501412,0.004116907,0.041359283,0.07622938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011752545,0.0022089886,0.0026242763,0.002349841,0.0031703657,0.0022923693,0.0028145327,0.01786727,0.012037771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016504979,0.000088890636,0.0023573295,0.00010716758,0.00007864122,0.0013265803,0.0015937748,0.00018341548,0.000378192,0.06358602,0.9228888,0.0072460403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015828425,0.000030139323,0.006032216,0.00022436545,0.0001152062,0.00014659956,0.0016383234,0.00039205968,0.0002408679,0.005438376,0.98546845,0.00011513723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9582214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98803526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9273756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07262441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17927617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52692944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777257781","doi":"","title":"My Friends Muddy the Waters: How a Statement of Principles Became a Public Fiasco","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Opposition (politics); Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Racism; Work (physics); Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Public relations; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.0825503013527463,"score_gpt":0.37894456186137304,"score_spread":0.2963942605086267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777257781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0114554055,0.0047477484,0.0075890617,0.8728422,0.0073855724,0.00008516458,0.00009395877,0.00014686394,0.095654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43581277,0.003483065,0.009822282,0.34273213,0.0029187847,0.00015484156,0.00016351331,0.00057636335,0.20433615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9681388,0.016372263,0.0009015421,0.0026166292,0.0074724467,0.00449834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97807133,0.010393899,0.0007451613,0.0016163103,0.0057367235,0.0034365351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0350309,0.00049311755,0.00057069445,0.0012185774,0.03981569,0.02249795,0.0032184874,0.017782772,0.0059039677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048130937,0.0008848125,0.00081390503,0.0010075882,0.0487538,0.0116717145,0.010879665,0.034705974,0.0018352616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022679478,0.000026967038,0.0006132632,0.00006914849,0.000009299424,0.0005938625,0.08788848,0.0001885626,0.0004599387,0.6327609,0.2548605,0.022506401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075480425,0.000015445745,0.00037893417,0.00019093126,0.0000057738885,0.000093665985,0.023061125,0.00014554126,0.00024215075,0.036713053,0.93909025,0.000055522523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42151418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57667387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42151418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040093742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06671583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8381214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777900688","doi":"","title":"Law Reform Commission of British Columbia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024586904895522035,"score_gpt":0.2994282357507725,"score_spread":0.2748413308552505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777900688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024569008,0.01192889,0.0004979822,0.115894265,0.004961775,0.00045645997,0.022872927,0.0006381169,0.8181806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025730895,0.0019532943,0.00040947762,0.0069690044,0.00012713365,0.00011490969,0.001432344,0.00008493718,0.963178],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606127,0.00023948879,0.00013757117,0.00038982605,0.00191247,0.0012594088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921744,0.00086585816,0.00018414082,0.00034463964,0.0051494483,0.0012816315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016085162,0.0005142008,0.00084911456,0.0037552712,0.012640895,0.009219196,0.0018595797,0.005326016,0.06540569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008135333,0.0009794772,0.000429391,0.0041721417,0.0014923037,0.0014306797,0.0017154246,0.0069113355,0.0072174747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053248532,0.00005252578,0.0022303686,0.0001694284,0.000019902382,0.0002522921,0.00056114927,0.00018490695,0.0002485117,0.043713763,0.92276406,0.02974993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022928773,0.0000087469625,0.0121806385,0.00019721221,0.000021735705,0.00003361641,0.0008761014,0.00023059391,0.00024233219,0.0012315811,0.98492175,0.00003278093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97827727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98979515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93076694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06923304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19542627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5023232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779135777","doi":"","title":"Law Society of Upper Canada. Department of Continuing Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Continuing education; Medicine; Medical education","score_opus":0.015955711093453225,"score_gpt":0.29331651526226354,"score_spread":0.2773608041688103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779135777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002329621,0.003990159,0.00033015298,0.048724458,0.0035305598,0.00023096139,0.026516955,0.0008268116,0.91352034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003947175,0.0011584705,0.0001919763,0.0017119622,0.000077902594,0.000021153926,0.0020623638,0.000079288315,0.9907498],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986118,0.000033851786,0.00003995332,0.0001102074,0.00083911803,0.0003649206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926704,0.00030599264,0.00010343195,0.00017324202,0.004715626,0.0020312278],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006741545,0.0005827442,0.000563951,0.0026108304,0.0049960534,0.0040696524,0.0014707462,0.0034146511,0.47038093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003735761,0.0005533166,0.00031687194,0.003477186,0.001260918,0.0010479824,0.00131911,0.0028624444,0.13025607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008888849,0.00001887546,0.00050813664,0.00003549086,0.0000016852852,0.000044481814,0.00006617362,0.000022766435,0.00005278182,0.002216522,0.9573802,0.039644074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004148862,0.0000030905906,0.003236804,0.000060674975,0.0000018604967,0.000020321553,0.00021682671,0.000050214614,0.000046486166,0.0002455083,0.9961079,0.00000625617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95510596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98544353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47038093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024214594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.107414804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7554373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780082174","doi":"","title":"Nova Scotia law news.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03399453352204534,"score_gpt":0.30978477443488217,"score_spread":0.2757902409128368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780082174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002059617,0.008990702,0.000112458125,0.03779243,0.006199527,0.00008964165,0.007459381,0.00028624525,0.93701005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031072756,0.0015750729,0.00008787682,0.005101723,0.00024728253,0.000017807586,0.0008435149,0.00004533738,0.9889742],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913174,0.000026026795,0.000029905106,0.00006290456,0.0005511189,0.00019831881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984176,0.00019195216,0.00006758208,0.000073026975,0.00096550124,0.0002842632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039344802,0.00045244864,0.00035540268,0.001380057,0.0045551946,0.0040788394,0.0007454491,0.00369293,0.17844844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029546197,0.0005262496,0.0004215373,0.001991574,0.0006389694,0.0009826219,0.000857325,0.0029194981,0.07205881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013278575,0.000007669016,0.00023898872,0.00004916043,0.0000015270135,0.00008795225,0.000053148608,0.000014294853,0.000087171895,0.0016965388,0.98708564,0.010664525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004803003,0.0000030342062,0.002777882,0.00006911343,0.0000021074454,0.000026117323,0.00010631591,0.000021368362,0.000055991757,0.00014240827,0.99678564,0.000005162944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.827439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9630894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17844844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010637104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01777243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5969695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780269994","doi":"","title":"University of British Columbia. Law Student Legal Advice Program.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Law; Legal advice; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.015485077507370014,"score_gpt":0.29277095182237023,"score_spread":0.27728587431500024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780269994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027540657,0.0033097726,0.00021845635,0.027490944,0.001372846,0.00010278778,0.044346392,0.0009150605,0.9194897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008161061,0.00132884,0.00030010557,0.0019260977,0.00006111236,0.000031982574,0.004147583,0.00013657479,0.9839066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991696,0.00005853537,0.000031879015,0.00008849111,0.00038132127,0.00027025212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496835,0.00044934082,0.0001107553,0.0001272705,0.002392948,0.0019512838],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006774863,0.00046753456,0.0005630015,0.002352998,0.004717113,0.0025183451,0.0013776631,0.0026493212,0.6625768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043906104,0.00046792958,0.00023992373,0.002974443,0.00069508306,0.0009942633,0.0012165223,0.001918896,0.19485433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011527206,0.00002826646,0.00050576014,0.000042332704,9.584962e-7,0.000024500148,0.000052728283,0.000012764736,0.00001690906,0.0006130893,0.9636833,0.03500775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015593987,0.000008553498,0.0097132,0.00024829037,0.000006417838,0.00004391061,0.000661502,0.00011852971,0.000071436596,0.00036384954,0.98873645,0.000012396133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8737511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9610374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98864055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011359455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027002674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4812932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782030223","doi":"","title":"Ontario Court of Appeal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0388234338851943,"score_gpt":0.33377769511890454,"score_spread":0.29495426123371027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782030223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069588283,0.0027170512,0.0003318564,0.1134094,0.0049218354,0.0007272427,0.0036733907,0.00019041523,0.8670701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019551126,0.0011222322,0.00029457605,0.063439265,0.00087841233,0.0003468651,0.00046649014,0.00009005928,0.9138109],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903866,0.00036689758,0.00029171715,0.0009438971,0.0041639544,0.0038468968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99378717,0.001189763,0.000114157185,0.00028027216,0.0035995464,0.0010290717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030315798,0.0014590521,0.0018348232,0.0038712882,0.041116063,0.015125562,0.0043908083,0.036787387,0.107086256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014248502,0.0023293674,0.0027124058,0.0031849185,0.0039226445,0.0027585393,0.0033804644,0.020638883,0.016453499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006979524,0.000062787185,0.0009852211,0.00007723641,0.000041652722,0.00069811195,0.00082300487,0.000113868344,0.00017450101,0.074969836,0.9154417,0.0065422226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007287776,0.000012907165,0.0030292904,0.00018052873,0.00006737758,0.00010067322,0.0009088937,0.00024749376,0.00022094682,0.004949177,0.9901372,0.00007257896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95448804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107086256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09197465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19781198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.667326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782490736","doi":"","title":"What More do you Want?! A Systematic Review of the Literature Surrounding Knowledge, Skills and Attributes in Clinical Legal Education: What Regulators and Governing Bodies Asked Universities to do and How we Have Responded","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Frequently asked questions; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.12181212548617615,"score_gpt":0.46605584947867995,"score_spread":0.3442437239925038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782490736","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027864564,0.985014,0.00045484808,0.008379672,0.0007908173,0.0009935659,0.0007813599,0.000015888752,0.00078338146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042207718,0.93272024,0.0053465534,0.01366591,0.0004554226,0.0041642594,0.0009793321,0.000025896403,0.00043472767],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9061808,0.05208678,0.025694083,0.0034018252,0.011342452,0.0012940188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7526128,0.18030168,0.03334546,0.004603265,0.026552882,0.002583897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0653723,0.0009684842,0.004848595,0.0150347045,0.0019584703,0.0060642287,0.002065084,0.0036622658,0.0046294387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24363233,0.001482119,0.005231159,0.015499958,0.0027774666,0.01039053,0.0035361466,0.0029106778,0.0007074687],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017399054,0.000036915433,0.0021409786,0.90952,0.0026806488,0.0001574029,0.003189033,0.000063726206,0.00019373411,0.0009618393,0.010748149,0.070133634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013257052,0.00012648098,0.0028064796,0.96716547,0.0038652483,0.00020960576,0.0025885748,0.00003118133,0.00007500557,0.0005426985,0.022417095,0.000039623017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011697783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04684844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0653723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007314956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045738705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3457259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783052119","doi":"","title":"Alberta law collection.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022679242597692995,"score_gpt":0.28939385567023324,"score_spread":0.26671461307254024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783052119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026787835,0.003667813,0.00017614898,0.0012968207,0.00042305823,0.00003658913,0.010404721,0.0005384851,0.98318845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011672735,0.0017290547,0.00022884736,0.00034840356,0.00006455933,0.000015888898,0.0031970318,0.00014056706,0.9931084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900985,0.000034249577,0.000027253018,0.00009925255,0.0006999875,0.00012938061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861956,0.00011632155,0.000030938616,0.00012112253,0.000960574,0.0001515115],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052583264,0.0009250582,0.00080640975,0.0051859817,0.005109922,0.0058748634,0.001662405,0.001877806,0.47476974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020576408,0.0009785723,0.00043351058,0.0083173,0.0008604181,0.0018890394,0.0014041775,0.002367876,0.28247145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005076614,0.0000067458086,0.00011855687,0.000047694943,0.0000011318492,0.000025732608,0.00006234194,0.000033078435,0.000036325844,0.0058663827,0.9604372,0.033359673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014196078,0.0000012638686,0.0006033275,0.00004785535,0.0000010777316,0.000018317218,0.000060278926,0.000022925647,0.000035135214,0.0006076251,0.9985972,0.0000036478841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74088764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90157413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47476974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014064342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016281439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7491772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783059405","doi":"","title":"Canada law journal.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020532895462418245,"score_gpt":0.27705742528411875,"score_spread":0.2565245298217005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783059405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004183249,0.006936593,0.000075227465,0.015492755,0.0017922051,0.000054904845,0.005278028,0.00022233177,0.9697297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023275297,0.0024274334,0.00009981414,0.0044143507,0.00024900204,0.000020265752,0.0010401447,0.00010463086,0.98931676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984201,0.000039718718,0.000039493374,0.00013819504,0.0010557234,0.00030674235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789006,0.00016336287,0.000047793874,0.000097605465,0.0013987919,0.00040234468],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005739489,0.00092546514,0.0006808398,0.0030144565,0.009243483,0.00906571,0.0017545761,0.00552874,0.44798112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00305389,0.00096485,0.00055951544,0.004822352,0.0015243406,0.0021362302,0.0015136163,0.0041057216,0.248536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047920807,0.000013170025,0.00014480778,0.00003675125,0.0000014803863,0.000022921142,0.000026223339,0.000014817233,0.000024366409,0.0041025076,0.9804534,0.015154886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033673923,0.0000011910324,0.00071594014,0.000053990152,0.0000018988588,0.000014391546,0.00007578899,0.000021178183,0.000022638034,0.00042271943,0.9986619,0.0000049467117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9120479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96993935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9730078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026992178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060352463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7873879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784580253","doi":"","title":"What We Talk About When We Talk About Skills: Toward a Taxonomy of Legal Skills for Teaching and Leaning in Ontario","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxonomy (biology); Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.02029797424602756,"score_gpt":0.27544286141861385,"score_spread":0.25514488717258627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784580253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91623163,0.00083846675,0.008023204,0.013878383,0.00007246771,0.0007119104,0.0006635589,0.000051942287,0.05952854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891516,0.0007996992,0.0033823652,0.0006272896,0.000011432048,0.00035807252,0.00023758058,0.00002669167,0.005405329],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923151,0.0023536775,0.00048448885,0.0005090689,0.0026044983,0.0017331559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886402,0.004738275,0.0014374774,0.000314297,0.0028370267,0.002032796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006267039,0.0004889395,0.00039940112,0.00485964,0.016891792,0.006932681,0.0016678808,0.00153434,0.0028994319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012619019,0.00056200183,0.00039619976,0.0069660707,0.019577159,0.005273709,0.005236367,0.0019103204,0.00022185002],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013126666,0.000017272821,0.017496599,0.00017231796,0.000002955392,0.00043510983,0.96211904,0.00008239514,0.00090863486,0.008943166,0.0013780954,0.008431249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039294955,0.000018714405,0.026266932,0.00023774165,0.0000059309514,0.00013008062,0.93170273,0.00026166602,0.00020595969,0.0027354204,0.03840616,0.000024666571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8882407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9299239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8882407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09190156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1203039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6667956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784706239","doi":"","title":"Ontario Bar Association.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Association (psychology); Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.027556995994193395,"score_gpt":0.30027892471458406,"score_spread":0.2727219287203907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784706239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002354004,0.0008434999,0.00010052221,0.0017261998,0.00055366074,0.000039834747,0.005901233,0.00031518715,0.9902845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00063598505,0.000254292,0.0000675325,0.00030479266,0.000028137212,0.000009345103,0.0008718398,0.00007428023,0.9977537],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989342,0.000039242834,0.00003544034,0.00013340941,0.0006216163,0.00023602018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985044,0.00009117481,0.000056034944,0.00010557858,0.0008764253,0.0003664322],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043988423,0.00088918064,0.00073335273,0.0021460208,0.0052512786,0.003937729,0.0012919017,0.0030187818,0.8250141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015746534,0.0010756344,0.00056986336,0.00296812,0.00076019054,0.0013829719,0.0020238669,0.0019685342,0.6767348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002206717,0.000016832946,0.00021378149,0.000052035033,0.0000020020116,0.00003968622,0.00003948086,0.000019793997,0.00005775644,0.0030536451,0.95694953,0.0395334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043005116,0.0000022877796,0.00056536787,0.000028396427,0.0000013577688,0.000015309974,0.000051791594,0.000019250629,0.000023909499,0.00020271505,0.99908173,0.0000036342813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51309514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80179495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8250141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008150561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012635421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9795447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785723375","doi":"10.36510/learnland.v3i2.341","title":"Education for Its Own Sake","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LEARNing Landscapes","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Legal education; Product (mathematics); Law; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.023499086717905703,"score_gpt":0.3715802986251923,"score_spread":0.34808121190728664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785723375","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007028771,0.010266343,0.005162919,0.6230985,0.0041077305,0.000014520812,0.000019698307,0.000085022344,0.35021648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5364111,0.008270188,0.0032761141,0.30874884,0.007254074,0.00007318072,0.00004597838,0.00020181599,0.13571875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99390113,0.0033684038,0.00011143324,0.00060989,0.0011684665,0.00084055803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99527353,0.0024032407,0.00029672144,0.0006045577,0.0005562954,0.00086563383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044734506,0.00042684335,0.00039614766,0.0006060858,0.0077599348,0.009994266,0.000961109,0.0069604856,0.009814551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00890132,0.000118301454,0.00039573378,0.00027630143,0.024446493,0.01262458,0.0077743577,0.011375086,0.0019797666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001230254,0.00003152422,0.00020668736,0.00006453304,0.0000059268023,0.0000753642,0.010521702,0.000070728,0.00015327508,0.9025699,0.056079257,0.030208917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006887433,0.000037081267,0.00025115113,0.00037458327,0.0000068518393,0.00013260369,0.0068111215,0.000072137256,0.000340835,0.19223802,0.7997153,0.000013566862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026094078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004451922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009994266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028966928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040727886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03283298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786196451","doi":"","title":"Manitoba Bar Association.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Association (psychology); Geography; Meteorology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03404228600575988,"score_gpt":0.32448398944490425,"score_spread":0.2904417034391444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786196451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027568585,0.0014528102,0.00028861404,0.010200903,0.0013158622,0.00008441596,0.008667527,0.00043687594,0.9747961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038671964,0.00041973873,0.00015275451,0.0010441404,0.000045028235,0.000018379124,0.0010832459,0.000058159054,0.9933114],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993205,0.00004459606,0.000022781654,0.0001341218,0.0003325145,0.00014550732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797386,0.00016312281,0.000074237265,0.00013053024,0.0012488223,0.00040940335],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045479796,0.0004768946,0.00029310753,0.0017748382,0.0054760436,0.0026475426,0.0013389827,0.0021715271,0.5253772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019543022,0.0006038772,0.000192926,0.0026761158,0.0006326893,0.0012035737,0.0013515025,0.002097607,0.24521537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037440834,0.00005759114,0.0020558794,0.000057835074,0.0000037583013,0.00015593653,0.00021752792,0.000032903565,0.00025318845,0.0062914146,0.93710667,0.053729903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005810047,0.000005308017,0.0034403862,0.000055097593,0.0000025902243,0.000045948564,0.00047087172,0.000041280204,0.0001175589,0.0003257413,0.99548376,0.0000056489434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39660093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73029906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60339904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047019524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012108704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78858495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787008886","doi":"10.29173/alr1340","title":"Advocacy in the New Millennium","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Best practice; Law; Legal profession; Political science; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Engineering ethics; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.04911185652060671,"score_gpt":0.3970555956888248,"score_spread":0.3479437391682181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787008886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068294615,0.142898,0.0030798018,0.5556782,0.008955852,0.00004002819,0.0000102320255,0.000050266437,0.28245822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47048008,0.1455802,0.011306817,0.16714785,0.008468455,0.0003075678,0.000036384004,0.00008149533,0.19659112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921119,0.003663129,0.00021667418,0.00039032777,0.0024979368,0.0011199707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99305326,0.002456116,0.0005177731,0.00040818416,0.0010476954,0.002516962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011436714,0.00034500708,0.00045510326,0.0011723617,0.0067395675,0.010605831,0.0010663164,0.0061021205,0.005476178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011206993,0.0002919039,0.00036343155,0.00076340395,0.016025184,0.007849061,0.0071137897,0.007646912,0.0008960856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001095441,0.000051517058,0.00050373876,0.00021826383,0.000011960093,0.00024240054,0.010264345,0.00015757729,0.00020393745,0.79683226,0.110750616,0.080752365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044432577,0.000012910502,0.0003782051,0.0006049066,0.0000031243176,0.00012194513,0.0034957896,0.00006072411,0.00004256086,0.08687302,0.90839213,0.000010219127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064796438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01189336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011436714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010258135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021905115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07442838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788315893","doi":"10.7202/1058308ar","title":"Guyana - How Do You Know Where to Get the Information You Need? Determining Ethics Approval Requirements in a Developing Country","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Research ethics; Interview; Principal (computer security); Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Political science; Ethical code; Developing country; Sociology; Business; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Economic growth; Economics; Computer security","score_opus":0.10463932559638069,"score_gpt":0.38910393861650355,"score_spread":0.2844646130201229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788315893","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23423667,0.010176635,0.016205192,0.6397181,0.0011577065,0.0028179248,0.00065669685,0.0003363304,0.09469477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85397416,0.006321352,0.034277927,0.08340776,0.00019782476,0.0022843387,0.000405348,0.0000982784,0.019032935],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95161307,0.036707807,0.002702335,0.0015764813,0.0023559034,0.005044463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92269707,0.04869056,0.004621175,0.0050224946,0.009468829,0.0094998665],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03984892,0.00040185245,0.00053559954,0.0017688399,0.012367885,0.014744419,0.0018231111,0.0067850715,0.007143865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06147215,0.0009862051,0.0003468116,0.0025395197,0.013471311,0.007552922,0.0075498773,0.009690169,0.0027136328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042373102,0.0002846402,0.059147973,0.003611659,0.00008002189,0.013451621,0.55405986,0.00041329797,0.011013452,0.1512919,0.07480114,0.13142067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007122014,0.000243809,0.040929995,0.00611827,0.000054749882,0.004620685,0.6009671,0.00030994456,0.0033381248,0.021510992,0.3215393,0.0002957757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042279415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06634483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0104790935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032087907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21074378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789004301","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5020","title":"REDUCING THE “JUSTICE GAP” THROUGH ACCESS TO LEGAL INFORMATION: ESTABLISHING ACCESS TO JUSTICE ENTRY POINTS AT PUBLIC LIBRARIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Economic Justice; Public access; Context (archaeology); Political science; Intermediary; Public relations; Information access; Scope (computer science); Law; Business; Public administration; Sociology; Internet privacy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.13096704119874325,"score_gpt":0.40694695882814635,"score_spread":0.2759799176294031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789004301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70540655,0.0013581935,0.025295394,0.038827397,0.00019725229,0.0006342153,0.00008336916,0.0005636423,0.22763395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718769,0.0005544184,0.0081672175,0.0014051273,0.00008322159,0.00015457478,0.00004313878,0.000041270854,0.01767422],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99272704,0.0031314238,0.00031281912,0.00043039036,0.0010961507,0.0023021873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776019,0.010016901,0.002292137,0.0017593501,0.0035171683,0.004812592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059322026,0.00020971787,0.00034495757,0.0026684224,0.013045257,0.015943164,0.002964029,0.0037181724,0.021062192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02524626,0.00047425693,0.00036594324,0.0021907443,0.006838251,0.015181931,0.019624723,0.0027315642,0.0022209594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002746698,0.0022859906,0.073221326,0.00057798787,0.000033160213,0.0039849756,0.14331332,0.0013650182,0.0040429807,0.31101766,0.027227493,0.43265545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020841604,0.0021388512,0.09816653,0.0021172187,0.00012843189,0.002197677,0.35142428,0.005345675,0.009575351,0.11357661,0.41483504,0.00028588227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011756218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03428453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98824376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058294777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0181762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07046008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789070291","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5021","title":"OUT OF THE CLOSET AND UP THE LADDER? DIVERSITY IN ONTARIO’S BIG LAW FIRMS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Closet; Lesbian; Negotiation; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Legal profession; Public relations; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1411676094563412,"score_gpt":0.3840802655985737,"score_spread":0.24291265614223254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789070291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97091,0.00047715034,0.00011764479,0.008916336,0.000045474826,0.000025504101,0.000048372625,0.0000055053592,0.01945412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900892,0.00036065571,0.00007949824,0.0008987681,0.0000094821335,0.000009010346,0.000020633091,0.000005332342,0.008527551],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969501,0.000651436,0.000055763678,0.0002238419,0.0006195474,0.0014993827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946367,0.0008737665,0.000490671,0.00012850946,0.00032234582,0.0035479153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016511667,0.00014358056,0.00027291023,0.0007273552,0.028686306,0.007629405,0.0013040222,0.0014544209,0.0055824155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033239124,0.00029714004,0.00013386093,0.0021039876,0.014006189,0.0024506452,0.0062580174,0.0020259088,0.00024325952],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004408086,0.000065175875,0.023676137,0.00006471477,0.0000048527736,0.0017140527,0.94107014,0.000064565706,0.0008622502,0.009011921,0.0072317575,0.016190367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042194756,0.000028373066,0.033504684,0.000084945685,0.000002135074,0.0001263885,0.913556,0.000051377763,0.00007262173,0.00070986256,0.05184268,0.000016766933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8490469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9601095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15095311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055199113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046762154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40049952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789341889","doi":"","title":"Disclosure practices in Toronto: report to the federal Department of Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.0509517717885384,"score_gpt":0.39302401189028197,"score_spread":0.3420722401017436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789341889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7625747,0.02410875,0.0005017933,0.10586953,0.00085392606,0.00042411758,0.027267696,0.00031874824,0.078080684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9152693,0.014944024,0.0007888988,0.0052295444,0.00017820843,0.00013926312,0.004268358,0.000048961123,0.059133343],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955017,0.0003005621,0.00029329426,0.00019642494,0.0024246918,0.001283388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880223,0.0012665414,0.002045273,0.00021608146,0.0047760135,0.0036737407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014627276,0.000292663,0.0003125747,0.002043851,0.009575467,0.0033325837,0.0014368123,0.0020946884,0.0083392635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008524709,0.0007391869,0.0004561896,0.0063430527,0.0018999606,0.00093287334,0.0023130048,0.0023451955,0.00062448723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025085296,0.0002189521,0.45374146,0.0009916197,0.00013809979,0.0019210748,0.04588899,0.0013497464,0.0008915028,0.0076754233,0.40664303,0.08028921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026183561,0.000045030774,0.9110542,0.0002956706,0.000057377536,0.00028478977,0.032721434,0.00050532864,0.00037594512,0.00021378441,0.05435349,0.00006681375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9085704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091429606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20803243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6633713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789344170","doi":"","title":"Practice update for general practitioners: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on June [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continuing education; Library science; Continuing medical education; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.015963775914948037,"score_gpt":0.3265455390250596,"score_spread":0.3105817631101116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789344170","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00895016,0.059744544,0.0056769513,0.42053565,0.055867273,0.004842025,0.03968389,0.0059950096,0.39870444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02813579,0.07333502,0.030841794,0.06829056,0.021559156,0.0041784835,0.047119364,0.0009410361,0.72559875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986864,0.00025507377,0.000181605,0.00006568973,0.0006128819,0.00019840685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901619,0.0012443714,0.00053494127,0.00024804863,0.00541624,0.0023944713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030779073,0.00074994727,0.0008548594,0.0023799164,0.0012792636,0.002155055,0.0014564687,0.004094635,0.09053073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009487913,0.00060741446,0.0005987007,0.0023382362,0.0004077544,0.0016579507,0.0017048321,0.0026192253,0.05561956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012993079,0.00003769516,0.00025408407,0.00012826716,0.0000014297465,0.000043461325,0.000048391852,0.000025039464,0.0000399099,0.000059291786,0.9526674,0.046682145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037963266,0.000052509997,0.007099858,0.0008092896,0.000006146155,0.00011697635,0.00022647042,0.000051664265,0.000043395157,0.00017095373,0.9913701,0.000014858166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08686049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30579993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9131395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033370466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00966164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30285543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789346103","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms: a guide for students","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Civil rights; Law","score_opus":0.025420101712067628,"score_gpt":0.3465174871243064,"score_spread":0.32109738541223876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789346103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013029166,0.029923266,0.0070021143,0.07079063,0.004446368,0.0008512856,0.013038762,0.001454993,0.8711896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010168116,0.030752968,0.017048568,0.013939335,0.00058196805,0.00057454867,0.0060170256,0.00078249385,0.92013496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974165,0.00024078216,0.00011167614,0.00010557566,0.0016747357,0.0004507292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663085,0.0004351182,0.000073546675,0.000099610035,0.0023081985,0.00045267274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023460567,0.0015750066,0.0010593049,0.0072737057,0.011103803,0.008567018,0.002700764,0.0044180388,0.067997105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055377767,0.0013410859,0.00075776863,0.011212421,0.00444492,0.005872856,0.0021815745,0.006099308,0.023515616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016694077,0.000008121706,0.00009142497,0.0000345067,5.368557e-7,0.000023039529,0.0004918731,0.000062478495,0.000024870697,0.018627107,0.9569514,0.02368306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012198175,0.0000015000476,0.00038729544,0.000102292324,9.89644e-7,0.000017329012,0.000709937,0.00003387343,0.000016608948,0.0021452885,0.99657226,0.000011465416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96565896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98766553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067997105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059853192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19572127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43426734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789379068","doi":"10.11575/prism/34017","title":"Whistleblowers: All truth is good, but not all truth is good to say","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Post truth; Alethiology; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Coherence theory of truth; Political science; Pragmatic theory of truth","score_opus":0.03678165661994946,"score_gpt":0.29284150747396775,"score_spread":0.2560598508540183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789379068","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003523066,0.009578814,0.0020861444,0.8120977,0.0143171605,0.000042545817,0.00009054403,0.00019804662,0.15806597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25269833,0.0075522973,0.0025829817,0.5683802,0.0077502537,0.000095312,0.00016573195,0.00029616882,0.16047874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814278,0.0066384585,0.00083903247,0.0016303086,0.007039381,0.0024249828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845383,0.0058206283,0.0013353813,0.0012013665,0.00388645,0.0032178932],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009088227,0.00059305155,0.0007047447,0.0008028311,0.013538949,0.020251786,0.0013501496,0.015187601,0.021270767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033343777,0.0005610812,0.00043490776,0.0007247733,0.02931267,0.015576406,0.010418884,0.021123713,0.009152794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023891613,0.000026790607,0.00056067546,0.00014233698,0.000011448496,0.0003227645,0.022316674,0.0000524996,0.00032852913,0.24792582,0.7008589,0.027429657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010163851,0.00001534258,0.000545758,0.00044763825,0.000007764904,0.00039109142,0.012315273,0.00007739542,0.00017935576,0.07599802,0.909983,0.000029172244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016218042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0151833575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9848124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005528415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012378321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07115787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789467741","doi":"","title":"Canadian legal literature = Documentation juridique au Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Political science; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.008980612761382714,"score_gpt":0.2712292628897773,"score_spread":0.26224865012839454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789467741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018195456,0.053148795,0.0007017445,0.011900818,0.0047247526,0.00014319636,0.061893217,0.0013996643,0.8642682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03025996,0.054858632,0.0021859652,0.0034562908,0.0010647643,0.00012518256,0.021690119,0.00093063485,0.8854284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975326,0.0000786966,0.00010168578,0.00017311823,0.001801901,0.0003119881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99469984,0.00042201037,0.00027734035,0.00016816682,0.003893521,0.0005391247],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069348846,0.0010919273,0.000978419,0.014981815,0.0099236155,0.009591874,0.0018020169,0.0014242736,0.3206848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065214946,0.0006256758,0.0003917573,0.033993136,0.003136241,0.00366708,0.0013218921,0.002057441,0.0652582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008594671,0.0000042740653,0.00021549598,0.00027958804,0.000002888276,0.00005106991,0.00035176272,0.000030166926,0.000044391596,0.012112233,0.9567833,0.030116305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001941588,7.763659e-7,0.0008660472,0.00018264544,0.0000023561242,0.000030256078,0.00019888525,0.000012078892,0.000041107978,0.00042224035,0.9982352,0.0000063470893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3206848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05924003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15268321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9689607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789675362","doi":"","title":"Law Courts Education Society of British Columbia.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.019824658939523742,"score_gpt":0.2979113655231361,"score_spread":0.27808670658361234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789675362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009487179,0.013904441,0.0007027476,0.12663728,0.0067441924,0.00024227466,0.024480915,0.0008645984,0.8169364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014013766,0.0025232874,0.00041369422,0.0032773116,0.0000900426,0.000038057562,0.0022244002,0.00006632491,0.9773531],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987863,0.00007391028,0.000055144053,0.00013939403,0.0005754314,0.0003699033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933971,0.00044825597,0.00012680875,0.00017846255,0.004090204,0.0017590858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086128386,0.00041204997,0.00042994824,0.0017745045,0.0059927753,0.004298425,0.0012151455,0.0033892924,0.21215752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004474852,0.0004580978,0.0002183586,0.0021134526,0.0007709082,0.0011858919,0.0012798199,0.0034125228,0.03248767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021242306,0.000028506623,0.0013161896,0.00010859068,0.0000040598215,0.00011386925,0.000201236,0.000053526135,0.00016686584,0.0038149427,0.9327285,0.06144241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008152939,0.0000053612066,0.01008204,0.00021524211,0.000005872599,0.000042296106,0.0008018468,0.000106793064,0.00011608386,0.0004497185,0.9881542,0.000012381721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9370844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98353946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21215752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020281855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08983664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7097376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789987600","doi":"","title":"A survey of the collection of Canadian statutes and subordinate legislation held in the Sir James Dunn Law Library","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Statute; Political science","score_opus":0.030016438878281575,"score_gpt":0.27236931957191396,"score_spread":0.2423528806936324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789987600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0745433,0.05543542,0.0015140988,0.018360928,0.0009609083,0.0007750433,0.3946609,0.0012925046,0.4524569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17159033,0.15196458,0.0066575925,0.011358569,0.0005804976,0.0006964794,0.31883335,0.0013886343,0.33692998],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98821217,0.00037775954,0.0005803903,0.0004727115,0.008790455,0.0015665658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96941894,0.0039507835,0.0022309138,0.0007529252,0.021470824,0.0021755695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039841393,0.0007291763,0.000882547,0.08915376,0.013057659,0.007792815,0.0022195058,0.00090617756,0.035913616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01891193,0.00076188287,0.00061740424,0.18863066,0.002820308,0.002155734,0.0021826955,0.0010514811,0.0074681505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005527829,0.000036403373,0.01822512,0.001904208,0.00003184772,0.00027964255,0.008743574,0.00013164709,0.00086891063,0.013086375,0.81212866,0.14450835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028127654,0.0000068319737,0.08391596,0.0006524222,0.000019098296,0.000109698085,0.0039423592,0.000048566944,0.00018843393,0.00020559703,0.9108744,0.000033760894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98165464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08915376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059209082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21414642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42959392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790181628","doi":"","title":"Index to Canadian legal literature, 1985-2000 = L'index a la documentation juridique au Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Documentation; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.009155307262152324,"score_gpt":0.27177022292961106,"score_spread":0.26261491566745876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790181628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032840713,0.18028599,0.0005693574,0.017204253,0.00671171,0.0002834715,0.24288519,0.0012638451,0.5475121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031017581,0.119270466,0.001888201,0.0042902767,0.0020558902,0.0002328729,0.08627856,0.0005114268,0.75445473],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873453,0.000029595907,0.000059055397,0.00007983027,0.0009027108,0.00019426573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959149,0.0002806497,0.00022549482,0.00006501209,0.0029877499,0.0005261795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052042253,0.0010250005,0.0008008571,0.024373211,0.00536738,0.0046934932,0.001444363,0.0008534689,0.148686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004830978,0.0004115414,0.0003442227,0.05201492,0.0015289715,0.0024242708,0.0011811384,0.0012086764,0.031031001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054933835,0.00000444203,0.00035232434,0.00020629639,0.0000020380216,0.00001280792,0.00013851192,0.000029411633,0.00002119176,0.001892574,0.9759271,0.021407792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025331212,0.0000014121119,0.006596777,0.0003824093,0.000004311767,0.000023400133,0.00022451331,0.000018870887,0.000020079586,0.00037543653,0.9923443,0.0000057897023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9792573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.148686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05746884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091094844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49740422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790304422","doi":"","title":"British Columbia law reports. [First series].","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Law; History; Geography; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.016337047816579832,"score_gpt":0.2592331388064582,"score_spread":0.24289609098987838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790304422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017224333,0.025667792,0.00024197981,0.021659095,0.004208345,0.00011837901,0.06450627,0.00073587405,0.8811398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045714625,0.005922147,0.00013349316,0.0016531167,0.0002541199,0.000048581842,0.0076080756,0.00015844573,0.9796505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992112,0.000028519202,0.000044556877,0.00006133838,0.0004810601,0.00017330704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690115,0.00025609875,0.000093096656,0.000099118646,0.0023733806,0.0002773017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000399844,0.00091683987,0.0005366251,0.003971689,0.0050048484,0.0048156492,0.0017601539,0.002852697,0.24428432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034006129,0.0010141593,0.0003696032,0.009696994,0.0008178864,0.0018883717,0.0008390677,0.003241249,0.09174472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049750984,0.000004663303,0.00015958738,0.000038716506,8.7489366e-7,0.000016658654,0.00002882505,0.000017559309,0.000015919979,0.00076327747,0.9902215,0.008727446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005110671,0.000002823226,0.0043974635,0.0001628586,0.0000041644626,0.000023174205,0.00020295991,0.000035989022,0.0000629113,0.00033220492,0.9947595,0.000010701771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93838465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98262423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24428432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019939674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029556068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81721246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790407233","doi":"","title":"Canadian legal materials held by the National Library of Australia, February 1980","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"National library; Library science; Political science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.03249467620212405,"score_gpt":0.30061376930804745,"score_spread":0.2681190931059234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790407233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018971092,0.04384435,0.00030906583,0.009868448,0.0030534018,0.00012771224,0.025366606,0.0004947013,0.91503847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032311499,0.009673821,0.00032910315,0.00056127144,0.00012926244,0.000024354631,0.0023992844,0.000079575846,0.98357207],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987349,0.000038524777,0.00005620278,0.00009357242,0.0008890053,0.00018786646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978028,0.00019243827,0.00006160776,0.00011610156,0.0015645911,0.0002623848],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000766054,0.0009398369,0.0009855776,0.008599248,0.009180824,0.0067252764,0.001384637,0.0017527296,0.18924859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051931385,0.0011113357,0.00047373713,0.0135339,0.0016094889,0.0030344923,0.0011933703,0.0017298236,0.056751307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012211533,0.000008120806,0.00018887735,0.00011435938,0.0000022185936,0.000033552667,0.00022687665,0.000051026294,0.00004093194,0.006092,0.9694678,0.023762083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019530407,0.00000198125,0.0018863287,0.00012143106,0.0000033313147,0.000015069803,0.0001472854,0.000024225534,0.0000416604,0.00051543297,0.99723536,0.0000058689066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9534038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9871436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99327475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043149527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08134873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6330996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790414707","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association. Ontario Branch. Continuing Legal Education.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Political science; Continuing education; Law; Medicine; Geography; Medical education; Psychology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.01300929917731779,"score_gpt":0.2800485923441868,"score_spread":0.267039293166869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790414707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000792606,0.012869953,0.00029806176,0.03805532,0.003619191,0.00021290629,0.021214858,0.0009942497,0.9219429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003718417,0.0073296786,0.0005365718,0.0037872079,0.000293452,0.0000796032,0.0046919384,0.00021184525,0.97935116],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983796,0.00004438748,0.00005561494,0.000121665726,0.0010614885,0.00033724305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930958,0.0003875403,0.00021766861,0.00016776375,0.00406241,0.0020687224],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006506382,0.0010255533,0.00074501586,0.0038485131,0.004683238,0.0030826428,0.0014945868,0.003956176,0.64269525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044552055,0.00074405834,0.00049731915,0.006921721,0.0015015948,0.001551595,0.0014084614,0.0025196222,0.31442854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012285607,0.0000131466495,0.00018786747,0.00006685805,0.0000011018866,0.000023475764,0.000034917626,0.000007895761,0.00002393869,0.00063120504,0.9637556,0.035241663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010942793,0.000003838506,0.0019820074,0.00012744013,0.0000033504127,0.000022655491,0.00011137989,0.0000339558,0.0000252282,0.00030028238,0.99737155,0.0000074427912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9264095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9752745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97890216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021097828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05927924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50965184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790558690","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law and health care in Canada: materials prepared for the Continuing Legal Education seminar, Constitutional [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Legal education","score_opus":0.019430342562758614,"score_gpt":0.30801106306355114,"score_spread":0.28858072050079253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790558690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011703228,0.05738216,0.0013610547,0.2591111,0.0077337967,0.0009783972,0.016885666,0.0007005709,0.644144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06768679,0.04502459,0.0032148536,0.02988022,0.0021538043,0.0004542237,0.006167061,0.00025923818,0.8451591],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993073,0.00004331593,0.000020808298,0.000030363884,0.00033972308,0.0002584324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984719,0.00031694648,0.00004080421,0.000030122277,0.0006336714,0.00050649745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010057383,0.00074044423,0.00046313964,0.0025753314,0.008290065,0.0035183094,0.0014247029,0.0034323349,0.06778696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028544879,0.00043179942,0.0003404938,0.0052094543,0.0024251414,0.0017131151,0.0013291156,0.0020177595,0.005124422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004196622,0.000022332379,0.0002975201,0.00008997786,0.0000011008443,0.00004426587,0.00096334476,0.00012465185,0.000066153385,0.0041699465,0.9712696,0.022946911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009092972,0.0000074765007,0.009745437,0.00027623173,0.0000047799385,0.000035233545,0.0035885186,0.000104623796,0.00009139628,0.0015336301,0.9845797,0.000023907605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9840906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99640536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06778696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06536488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16933072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47425765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790592393","doi":"","title":"Amendments to the Criminal Code and the Canada Evidence Act with respect to persons with disabilities: consultation paper","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Law; Political science; Legislation; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.05059888704551525,"score_gpt":0.3322848641036169,"score_spread":0.28168597705810167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790592393","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004731802,0.012205502,0.0011249764,0.68294054,0.011317251,0.0007035077,0.0036269014,0.0002395655,0.2831099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03073908,0.0064942,0.0030648722,0.494349,0.0020667263,0.00046380164,0.0011539867,0.0002559521,0.4614124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97014725,0.002341933,0.0019442175,0.0014195867,0.0142924385,0.009854628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96029025,0.014655948,0.00082664157,0.0010919753,0.01728889,0.0058462494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017085286,0.0012944612,0.001469282,0.0034713931,0.020276135,0.013426354,0.008993976,0.07017388,0.025799638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056936454,0.0024218524,0.002188946,0.0038493378,0.008090465,0.0051841573,0.005579118,0.032605052,0.0056196023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024646568,0.00003897815,0.00030883972,0.00013140605,0.000012238156,0.00024273263,0.0015706748,0.00017144922,0.00020299068,0.03487289,0.9560406,0.006382508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006148065,0.000014347281,0.0032254534,0.0006183864,0.000050042367,0.00010152786,0.0023723696,0.00012243677,0.00031227362,0.0047686985,0.98823357,0.000119432414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97672325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99070555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08230239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08230239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41946563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5971484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790795354","doi":"","title":"University of Alberta. Law Library","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.012382210865184396,"score_gpt":0.23061880293966755,"score_spread":0.21823659207448315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790795354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037572204,0.0018024814,0.000116572824,0.00202204,0.0006924397,0.000032478998,0.008766278,0.0012437536,0.98494834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015857916,0.0007897537,0.00015543522,0.00034703113,0.000050674815,0.0000117007685,0.0017688286,0.00022618863,0.99506456],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986143,0.00008908809,0.0000494397,0.00016321085,0.00071538804,0.0003686079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965526,0.00041616976,0.00011542188,0.00027038154,0.0013944202,0.0012509865],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076950085,0.0017278576,0.0011551683,0.008711063,0.008424394,0.01191564,0.0028119122,0.005151252,0.8814885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032789162,0.0012678801,0.00075096026,0.012906547,0.0020389433,0.0028397362,0.0028383352,0.0022449072,0.6907352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025107043,0.000036982474,0.0003245069,0.00017743566,0.0000037137893,0.00012070139,0.00011933411,0.00007469696,0.000058061203,0.004443366,0.9310376,0.063578404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010619758,0.0000047633253,0.0009364828,0.00015677564,0.000004284334,0.000036482015,0.000324258,0.00006325785,0.000064933345,0.0010492116,0.997336,0.000012943752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7477668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85777825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8814885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019735575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037228454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5074373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790819948","doi":"","title":"Employment law, 1994: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on April 15, 1994","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Political science; Continuing education; Sociology; Library science; Medicine; Medical education; Computer science","score_opus":0.025139699479721334,"score_gpt":0.33205326783687095,"score_spread":0.3069135683571496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790819948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01791485,0.026086595,0.001121475,0.060787823,0.007914646,0.0025136925,0.036823172,0.0015553918,0.8452823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012960076,0.0043506576,0.000849432,0.0018713266,0.0005174129,0.00032013556,0.005786613,0.00013726116,0.97320706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995974,0.000027614176,0.000016923455,0.00002458263,0.00019030826,0.00014317039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991242,0.0001907692,0.00003322218,0.000023368326,0.00036284377,0.000265641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008210935,0.000782728,0.00045165644,0.0020770964,0.003904647,0.0025238984,0.0013817607,0.0030258133,0.13510045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017703857,0.0006471225,0.00021326829,0.0030208058,0.00067407486,0.0008788502,0.00085055194,0.0017534607,0.039696086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022477661,0.000036954756,0.00032750564,0.00007233003,8.927096e-7,0.000061796745,0.00035280542,0.00006756795,0.00016303213,0.00028265684,0.97453135,0.024080627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019242143,0.000025525902,0.013679284,0.00021106724,0.0000034146765,0.00003376364,0.0012200982,0.000060435632,0.00019741328,0.0002821605,0.98425364,0.000013866485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5738694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.898299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4261306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0095593585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013104259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8572803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790825396","doi":"","title":"Labour Relations Board practice: materials prepared for a continuing legal education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on June 13, 1985","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continuing education; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.017770608631463708,"score_gpt":0.3383889180070136,"score_spread":0.3206183093755499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790825396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039227605,0.017690148,0.0020896588,0.044184875,0.013248693,0.006245325,0.0181465,0.0013056407,0.85786146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020737149,0.002246654,0.0011838308,0.0010697666,0.00063625094,0.00044825737,0.00271075,0.00010019741,0.97086716],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962556,0.00004836261,0.00001834479,0.00002940174,0.00012833338,0.00014994266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999094,0.00020650399,0.00003228892,0.000032322685,0.00027148527,0.00036344543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001094192,0.0008799302,0.00041496594,0.0015839376,0.0039558434,0.0019086174,0.0010061862,0.0024100877,0.12309224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014586672,0.0006291176,0.00023426533,0.0018943966,0.0007226232,0.00085944415,0.0010574461,0.0013238619,0.029401869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009450675,0.00011794254,0.0007210404,0.00018926937,0.0000015054552,0.00020041625,0.0014219389,0.00017021585,0.00093714317,0.00076248724,0.93654954,0.05883403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016336686,0.000060522092,0.014576772,0.00016484433,0.0000021656788,0.00003519408,0.0016730299,0.00005296889,0.00029988293,0.00023900544,0.98286736,0.000012009074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23733212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6930998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7626679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050564446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0079571195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47190136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790852331","doi":"","title":"Continuing Legal Education Society of Nova Scotia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Political science; Continuing education; History; Medical education; Medicine; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.02448403297094213,"score_gpt":0.32380065220187115,"score_spread":0.299316619230929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790852331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02868865,0.016098093,0.00063561136,0.18598157,0.018347466,0.00043253135,0.012170794,0.00062849995,0.7370168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0227842,0.0028364656,0.00060722354,0.004928216,0.0003890083,0.00006255618,0.0017666655,0.000046463738,0.96657926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984438,0.00011080563,0.00010049471,0.00016208102,0.0006576863,0.0005251315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840099,0.0012280976,0.0005537629,0.0005484807,0.008376271,0.0052834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001178877,0.0003794949,0.0003081964,0.0020084307,0.003230368,0.0035217144,0.00085780467,0.0028178336,0.1574051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070820963,0.00034045204,0.00029438178,0.0012551688,0.0008562502,0.00065469503,0.0016518916,0.0018388175,0.024942003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006155244,0.000036054465,0.004941667,0.00017703911,0.000007908243,0.0005442237,0.00031563343,0.00006150631,0.0005811353,0.003604788,0.9179539,0.07171458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013406014,0.000010908204,0.021924112,0.00020016961,0.000004352121,0.00013652543,0.00033665806,0.000084914995,0.000103401035,0.00020766324,0.9769707,0.000007217533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78885853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9148476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014085092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10174688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52657247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790950295","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5043","title":"LAWYER COMPETENCIES FOR ACCESS TO JUSTICE: TWO EMPIRICAL STUDIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Thompson Rivers University; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Framing (construction); Economic Justice; Sociology; Critical reflection; Legal profession; Social justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Law; Pedagogy; Law and economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.34434728378089996,"score_gpt":0.5682591560974322,"score_spread":0.2239118723165322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790950295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800008,0.0031402712,0.00064338784,0.0025349404,0.000039256644,0.0005164073,0.00025660213,0.0000098525725,0.012858532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99306387,0.0019914645,0.000855941,0.0012496972,0.000048678477,0.0008779772,0.0003152244,0.000018400568,0.0015787373],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97630936,0.014001852,0.0017731313,0.0018751036,0.003839375,0.0022011593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5940801,0.34459025,0.030064603,0.010347519,0.014494726,0.0064228377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039164726,0.00069353933,0.00091078784,0.0063859574,0.007722903,0.006823596,0.0034513841,0.0039149076,0.012996368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16808142,0.0011793734,0.0006735714,0.007546476,0.010199542,0.0117200315,0.011630823,0.008563434,0.0009837445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005520191,0.01331558,0.28156313,0.0024211598,0.00019255852,0.0014666812,0.6192675,0.00015619717,0.00042983872,0.023184726,0.0069467193,0.050503917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002562507,0.0006513693,0.3366137,0.0039311266,0.00022533185,0.00096074364,0.6330764,0.00044185293,0.00049269863,0.0038574545,0.019402616,0.00009041672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021760015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039031755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074910005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008795211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2071253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791013172","doi":"","title":"The lawyer's desk book 1986: being a compendium of information useful to the practice of law in Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compendium; Desk; Law; Political science; Library science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.01660905487995269,"score_gpt":0.2792370961637616,"score_spread":0.2626280412838089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791013172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038628145,0.023675406,0.0013849369,0.04547256,0.0030408753,0.00020214256,0.0032587836,0.0003183705,0.91878396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00717711,0.006794824,0.000817963,0.0016354158,0.00021670337,0.000027959422,0.00030699937,0.0001296427,0.9828934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893624,0.00007062822,0.000049219812,0.00006610918,0.0006862991,0.00019161115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981325,0.0004378041,0.00008172781,0.00008738722,0.00084489724,0.00041562918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095026725,0.0004818984,0.0004201871,0.002092934,0.00987577,0.0054087443,0.0008456845,0.0024497188,0.091675825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035912027,0.00072991254,0.00025198603,0.0055130403,0.0028723052,0.00313372,0.0014990903,0.0020327845,0.014437909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008364261,0.000009705692,0.00036851846,0.000120836594,0.0000011990983,0.00006833462,0.0034406995,0.000045550638,0.00018547096,0.01837055,0.9416834,0.035697427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013323672,0.0000018148294,0.00084111886,0.000046154983,0.0000012854177,0.000018000788,0.00040047863,0.000012270275,0.000028972436,0.0003616,0.9982827,0.0000044190474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92721915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99002063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9607541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03924592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.095250286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30668616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791044334","doi":"","title":"Bibliographies on the legal profession and legal education in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Legal education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015604209956927026,"score_gpt":0.28492665315762716,"score_spread":0.26932244320070015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791044334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005404494,0.24425963,0.00040337146,0.010111551,0.0017080632,0.00022454774,0.04974275,0.00033998463,0.68780553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06288555,0.60290784,0.002427468,0.003877304,0.00063497724,0.00026402224,0.02629917,0.00032225114,0.30038136],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966556,0.00013113586,0.00015881538,0.00015389567,0.002350026,0.00055046444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931971,0.00096819305,0.00038240408,0.0001235761,0.0047707357,0.00055802305],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010784505,0.0011816842,0.0015849469,0.043031137,0.011383743,0.0073044198,0.0020284054,0.0013293289,0.11112312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071936925,0.0006959842,0.0007763673,0.17441447,0.0027797734,0.0019297022,0.0017476903,0.0018305026,0.0084828725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032014996,0.00002759915,0.0013597046,0.0046002977,0.000035416793,0.00025692614,0.0023079494,0.0004043502,0.00013413328,0.02116957,0.86629987,0.103372216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007630124,0.0000028398665,0.007071112,0.0042400276,0.00006358125,0.00007931883,0.0015546946,0.00007747388,0.000092340844,0.0008235479,0.9859649,0.000022568063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99607146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95696884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11987588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35669398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86976445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791098417","doi":"","title":"Labour Relations Code: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on January 21, 1993","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Continuing education; Political science; Code of practice; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Programming language; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.02133920422399733,"score_gpt":0.3285967569542196,"score_spread":0.30725755273022226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791098417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01719275,0.010440746,0.0012676142,0.057611804,0.007830754,0.002261368,0.023741474,0.0010905789,0.878563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0102386745,0.0011120538,0.0005417364,0.0012909415,0.0002335573,0.00013955923,0.00208286,0.000109569926,0.9842509],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996387,0.000024991317,0.0000122488245,0.000021408769,0.00018497634,0.00011769704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990194,0.00019214406,0.000031165328,0.00003129698,0.00048671922,0.00023924325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006457508,0.00048880436,0.00031577962,0.0013667399,0.003917385,0.0017387667,0.000810136,0.002628578,0.114938386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019383121,0.00040419027,0.00017345579,0.0016659771,0.00066011836,0.00059065747,0.00058178906,0.0015621516,0.02785073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020379764,0.000029207033,0.00031076572,0.000060395858,6.430743e-7,0.000076771576,0.00044334398,0.000055364348,0.0003181371,0.0008475359,0.97437704,0.023460383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008120189,0.000016714637,0.008110478,0.00007537467,0.0000013961786,0.000020735864,0.00079630135,0.00003584128,0.00023486587,0.0001827934,0.9905067,0.000010667242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6049088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8808674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39509118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075261863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0136319045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79483587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791157298","doi":"","title":"Practice issues for Vancouver Island lawyers : materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Nanaimo, B.C. [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continuing education; Legal education; Law; Political science; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.01521101398445248,"score_gpt":0.32968644301832506,"score_spread":0.3144754290338726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791157298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045195922,0.02244675,0.0034618692,0.45787856,0.022390489,0.008653406,0.0034598673,0.0013214898,0.43519175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10131332,0.02088818,0.010944424,0.03470331,0.005644608,0.0040377183,0.0032910502,0.00028098963,0.8188964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990748,0.000250102,0.000045245506,0.000044432796,0.00029754327,0.0002878132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940408,0.0015978559,0.00018158059,0.00008394932,0.0013337274,0.0027621656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030326117,0.00097389217,0.0004964725,0.0012108022,0.010239097,0.0038775986,0.0018546485,0.006207749,0.066261835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006098544,0.00063734065,0.00034176474,0.0012465869,0.0014442186,0.0016823298,0.0025660098,0.003959659,0.01044309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026146794,0.00016104327,0.00066482316,0.000251461,0.000001906743,0.0004088803,0.004305559,0.00012867597,0.00044505837,0.00068249827,0.93009186,0.06283212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000250861,0.00007624798,0.008636667,0.0006032555,0.000004646174,0.00018877354,0.01576823,0.0001083875,0.00020941968,0.00084918167,0.97349846,0.00003164914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18245056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63621676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81754947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010867023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02872255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36277717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791195712","doi":"","title":"Canadian Law Information Council. Committee on Public Legal Education and Information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Information governance; Public information; Public administration; Information system; Management information systems","score_opus":0.01929661186311398,"score_gpt":0.25065838866231793,"score_spread":0.23136177679920394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791195712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020433243,0.0075414693,0.0021563063,0.16622366,0.013370755,0.0033002938,0.048728537,0.0018522674,0.75478345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007961382,0.0039397795,0.0042183097,0.031787753,0.0013832558,0.0011026174,0.016097909,0.0005719891,0.93293685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9507033,0.0021921857,0.002881732,0.0017773783,0.03533484,0.007110517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8456068,0.013859031,0.002469458,0.005516059,0.11961406,0.012934562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02803634,0.0023940906,0.0024751143,0.016411358,0.017769234,0.015391587,0.009410607,0.026828505,0.11281452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058594774,0.0033840938,0.0029921203,0.01654349,0.005042806,0.005711033,0.004303638,0.015157981,0.045780618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013489715,0.000031183812,0.00018760926,0.00006968359,0.0000037737295,0.000020068836,0.000076667675,0.000050659113,0.000046862206,0.004909212,0.9880283,0.0065625226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002006918,0.0000066529683,0.0034969694,0.00031153925,0.000020478166,0.000010274636,0.00024040141,0.000114356044,0.00016655675,0.0010842559,0.99448496,0.000043518347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9685101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9744005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93437165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06562833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39550772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47616905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791493877","doi":"","title":"Human rights in the workplace: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on September [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.023648713451234545,"score_gpt":0.3494829680158425,"score_spread":0.32583425456460796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791493877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024124522,0.031901024,0.0017513041,0.2613334,0.030662736,0.0038860678,0.0049740174,0.00096682814,0.6404002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02605581,0.0069982056,0.0011819534,0.009880226,0.0023569453,0.0005441958,0.0014601748,0.00013125979,0.9513913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995191,0.000057275272,0.000017838882,0.000035169727,0.00015728074,0.00021331082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988803,0.00021187008,0.000028173954,0.000025984784,0.00028914306,0.00056449836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013931707,0.0009286374,0.00053756917,0.0008992352,0.006457169,0.0026454434,0.0011433052,0.005850842,0.07670085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014663285,0.0005071974,0.00031237272,0.0009225243,0.0010317597,0.001252795,0.001726339,0.003130635,0.017132668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025027875,0.000078864075,0.00033115956,0.00011474732,0.0000012021208,0.0001757226,0.0011743706,0.00007151522,0.0004977202,0.0005854198,0.9713724,0.02557174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013193979,0.00003702097,0.0073412415,0.00021468096,0.0000024892147,0.000052041705,0.0033348312,0.000042933203,0.00021750799,0.00039074075,0.98833674,0.000016504542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29246798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73601156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70753205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060157073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5815313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791581946","doi":"","title":"Report on the administration of justice in Manitoba","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Economic Justice; Administration of justice; Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06644167629417974,"score_gpt":0.3521027447836486,"score_spread":0.2856610684894689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791581946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32033515,0.020712284,0.000605573,0.22705059,0.006575678,0.0015042399,0.03823042,0.00046822018,0.38451788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21300757,0.014748107,0.0008044606,0.033229765,0.0005866355,0.0005219175,0.005904511,0.00008535691,0.7311117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639493,0.00023270278,0.00013639923,0.00010875069,0.0017078621,0.0014194528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99320257,0.00075192313,0.00033436148,0.000115628805,0.0031863188,0.002409092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020580962,0.00052110624,0.00039170092,0.0034896985,0.009761049,0.0044607227,0.0021929971,0.0043976884,0.022184176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052905655,0.0009067346,0.0005414501,0.005767619,0.0013836359,0.0012321913,0.0037349127,0.0041288985,0.0025181992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017381489,0.00036821747,0.121324055,0.0010034353,0.00014503996,0.003954947,0.014997002,0.0008071904,0.001941624,0.01892441,0.7886575,0.047702797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029798914,0.000087643864,0.3541243,0.0004883494,0.00009232342,0.0003562056,0.043962747,0.00030647978,0.0008559258,0.00063962245,0.5989775,0.00007914061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9638315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036168516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029154513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18838382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21153176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791599261","doi":"","title":"Public law, 1988-1989: the Law Society of Upper Canada bar admission course materials","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Course (navigation); Political science; Bar (unit); Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.03525702729177126,"score_gpt":0.2881913378253722,"score_spread":0.25293431053360094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791599261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09863323,0.016158808,0.00084678474,0.09486337,0.0036825365,0.00076058874,0.043969993,0.0011913801,0.7398933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10502565,0.004141691,0.0009606761,0.0031062642,0.00034129887,0.0001887609,0.006814153,0.00017744387,0.87924415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986902,0.00005176661,0.000029578257,0.00006576144,0.0007549699,0.00040786184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953701,0.00025075508,0.00015574029,0.00006564829,0.0024921298,0.0016655087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013036919,0.0005005043,0.00031254548,0.0033058096,0.0096609965,0.004975669,0.0019054253,0.0017825791,0.06637009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004800679,0.00068183197,0.00015990401,0.006514625,0.001323163,0.0019218534,0.0019307488,0.0017772762,0.009275521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016042059,0.00007321221,0.003649455,0.000054584023,0.0000012744324,0.000062719686,0.0023573036,0.00010171646,0.00011025824,0.0038360404,0.9268867,0.062850624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008402193,0.000011266433,0.06769383,0.00019889073,0.0000036351412,0.00002806418,0.0047975588,0.00011892379,0.00012395304,0.0005649537,0.92643404,0.000016513632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97779363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99573934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07821244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07821244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17822738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56747365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791717686","doi":"","title":"CLE research guide, volume 2: index to Continuing Legal Education 1991 publications of the Law Society of Upper Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Index (typography); Political science; Legal education; Volume (thermodynamics)","score_opus":0.03150154415206753,"score_gpt":0.3419835860847871,"score_spread":0.31048204193271955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791717686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016874914,0.01629677,0.002228746,0.01265903,0.0028379338,0.0016992701,0.18152638,0.0032452592,0.7778191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028492827,0.010890366,0.0030818917,0.0022127514,0.00035504374,0.000568535,0.040742937,0.0006963614,0.93860286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601907,0.00021189716,0.000188938,0.00021239709,0.0029404017,0.00042742645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811141,0.0019683163,0.0003993298,0.00050511264,0.014574629,0.0014385857],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030088725,0.000998255,0.0015413425,0.016379401,0.0050738445,0.0071237115,0.0020843549,0.001721872,0.4264749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015811207,0.0009123533,0.00063420826,0.02242738,0.0008903994,0.003253948,0.0014728141,0.001769821,0.20330676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007715176,0.00001815097,0.00026623477,0.0001278998,0.0000011255107,0.000006462164,0.000072304676,0.0000239713,0.00005279053,0.0005486366,0.9550512,0.04382363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053166,0.0000064025394,0.0032878984,0.00025116454,0.0000036424844,0.000016176944,0.00016366299,0.00004555636,0.00006668348,0.00023307634,0.9959103,0.000010087182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8319802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9393878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025038507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.095127836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.818064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791775069","doi":"","title":"Index to Canadian legal literature, 2001-2007: an index and bibliography of Canadian legal literature classified according to Library [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Library science; Bibliography; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02083437962920314,"score_gpt":0.28316349132797813,"score_spread":0.262329111698775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791775069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032725201,0.31116453,0.00088735425,0.0146415485,0.007888639,0.00045542218,0.32632318,0.0010815508,0.3342853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026876902,0.46386188,0.0066428473,0.0056105284,0.002770133,0.0004521726,0.20151553,0.00061818695,0.2916518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977824,0.000051256615,0.00014107586,0.00012833593,0.001637714,0.00025924816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98843074,0.0006628251,0.00047849395,0.00011099422,0.009517731,0.00079919305],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083576894,0.0013796004,0.0011797544,0.078766234,0.006658954,0.004614493,0.0020028548,0.00089465955,0.076174416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071597234,0.00044616815,0.00053261017,0.14723442,0.0016980441,0.0027556887,0.0017935751,0.0010804207,0.020933649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008560722,0.000004539438,0.00037533802,0.0012477797,0.0000052330593,0.000035570247,0.00031312281,0.000047299054,0.000063652566,0.0013111983,0.9583639,0.038223837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020911277,0.0000018079676,0.00500123,0.0014647514,0.00001692902,0.000064895445,0.00042554073,0.000019583787,0.000039516373,0.00029381638,0.99265665,0.000013047581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93533564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96777445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9212338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04572429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.106204085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3317545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791802331","doi":"","title":"Employment law, 1999: materials prepared for the Continuing Legal Education seminar, Employment law '99 held in Vancouver, B.C. on [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Labour law; Legal education; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.028089738049438744,"score_gpt":0.33538773696452345,"score_spread":0.3072979989150847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791802331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008481028,0.026929663,0.0013387004,0.06204781,0.010001892,0.0015473331,0.05539778,0.0018433895,0.8324124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011325297,0.008055902,0.0009102336,0.0033198064,0.0010156826,0.00033377286,0.011327635,0.00031414875,0.96339744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967563,0.000032828728,0.000019434337,0.000020638226,0.00017471884,0.00007675142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894625,0.00031367666,0.0000446859,0.000029016532,0.0004360284,0.00023032108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008216743,0.00087783835,0.0004042562,0.0021767728,0.0030461662,0.0026717642,0.0010697386,0.0030314631,0.1898223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019860608,0.00059295405,0.00021071585,0.0033977102,0.0006045901,0.0014555078,0.0009101814,0.0015587342,0.07117474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008315176,0.000016802742,0.00013284567,0.000059221507,4.413847e-7,0.000029002507,0.00020055751,0.00003197614,0.00006873793,0.00018103867,0.9838578,0.015413205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000100611815,0.0000142427,0.009442719,0.0002755334,0.0000018667807,0.000029850891,0.0009011121,0.000042130083,0.000109656175,0.0003190658,0.9888442,0.000009610834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32595158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71236837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6740484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005458231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073665613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64810866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792019768","doi":"","title":"Public Legal Education Society of Nova Scotia. Libraries Committee","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Political science; Library science; Public administration; Sociology; Engineering; Ethnology; Aeronautics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04068192296092537,"score_gpt":0.2874115292196249,"score_spread":0.2467296062586995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792019768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007479693,0.009987681,0.0004478593,0.15011528,0.017308053,0.0006569333,0.01992921,0.0010133395,0.79306203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005671083,0.0007724159,0.0002516216,0.0054685953,0.00031083418,0.000056642803,0.0017109248,0.00007302409,0.985685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780804,0.00013355965,0.00010920028,0.00021614009,0.000937074,0.0007959638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864026,0.0007888424,0.0002703618,0.00054169464,0.009302041,0.0026944582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001870052,0.00054258044,0.0006239485,0.0024470715,0.006653897,0.0052797836,0.0012811365,0.004809127,0.16170293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050513083,0.000721384,0.00047567606,0.002139514,0.00094427,0.0011491046,0.0018534096,0.003050724,0.057671357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038619273,0.000015137723,0.0006204146,0.0000663508,0.0000023846833,0.000098795106,0.00008449628,0.000024177742,0.0001459028,0.0015864772,0.982856,0.014461381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009033902,0.000004609417,0.00633077,0.00008713073,0.000004159967,0.000026979409,0.00018646815,0.00003294442,0.000092848764,0.0001224961,0.9930943,0.0000081727985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8463862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9466474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16170293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018530145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09428886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5409502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792037548","doi":"","title":"Justice Canada : serving Canadians.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.031196754232270342,"score_gpt":0.2939731342241911,"score_spread":0.2627763799919207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792037548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040512257,0.12521252,0.00056039,0.32679167,0.013375842,0.00011287132,0.009706677,0.0006728221,0.519516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037046574,0.050201118,0.0012272999,0.032192163,0.001220948,0.00007818979,0.0025430573,0.00022543166,0.8752652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982545,0.00006100757,0.00003364512,0.00010346155,0.0009098892,0.00063753116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964154,0.000104669176,0.00006693348,0.000050566705,0.002336841,0.001025651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009783976,0.00081156625,0.0004648702,0.0021358654,0.014690832,0.0058263727,0.0015170022,0.003923055,0.08208983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034927921,0.0004552521,0.00042815538,0.005593406,0.0022913085,0.0022941544,0.0016052916,0.0034958506,0.010948057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038166527,0.0000062097024,0.00028390886,0.000046899473,0.0000012961553,0.000028498129,0.0002104185,0.000018484021,0.000021169026,0.0036944305,0.97731817,0.018366696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043004416,0.0000027195222,0.0029673742,0.00015002067,0.0000052491805,0.000033230113,0.0013457433,0.00003058506,0.00003938312,0.0005682271,0.9948403,0.000012935926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99855274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93086016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06913984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29644218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.501647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792052333","doi":"","title":"Accommodating ethnic and cultural factors in damages for personal injury","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Damages; Personal injury; Political science; Sociology; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.13304648849849282,"score_gpt":0.4523207221508023,"score_spread":0.3192742336523095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792052333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9430691,0.0008169785,0.00023139779,0.007783633,0.00009251952,0.000040113504,0.0000869148,0.0000059670215,0.04787347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970798,0.00023482634,0.000062927735,0.00059350755,0.000025542342,0.000007119004,0.000021090518,0.000004797996,0.0019703712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99528426,0.0018393565,0.00030990754,0.00023924171,0.0008739163,0.0014533395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897607,0.0016613564,0.003955783,0.000748206,0.0015969401,0.0022769682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027880152,0.00023676547,0.0002711523,0.0014683588,0.009677365,0.0035359466,0.0012475537,0.0014967246,0.0123214675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017839696,0.00019993662,0.000459028,0.0017315858,0.004208774,0.0023566252,0.005272011,0.002601111,0.0008048609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102854014,0.0004108062,0.89091814,0.00004791282,0.00008938694,0.0022252484,0.06137805,0.00022140304,0.000112415044,0.014002593,0.004932303,0.025558801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010679699,0.0001331026,0.65254354,0.00042702866,0.000054099604,0.0031990476,0.31289855,0.00038764314,0.00015670371,0.0077655315,0.022363346,0.00006071883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03794081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07496732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03794081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030032434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003271606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07543993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792117849","doi":"","title":"Journal - Canadian Bar Association.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.020581908933639967,"score_gpt":0.2848078723028718,"score_spread":0.2642259633692318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792117849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060336496,0.0153463,0.00014435711,0.012965987,0.0052632526,0.00006271517,0.010858701,0.00030701584,0.9544483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036712606,0.0068677133,0.00016753405,0.0016770869,0.00045013262,0.000021356413,0.002202137,0.000097391836,0.9848454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992343,0.00001807207,0.000027469217,0.00007962032,0.0005016409,0.00013886188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708,0.00011395873,0.00006664648,0.00011057665,0.0020640763,0.0005646892],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004296647,0.00072743633,0.00050984975,0.002981937,0.004162562,0.005005801,0.0012102644,0.0026876095,0.49614903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026280908,0.00056967087,0.00032155364,0.0058356295,0.0009705533,0.0020249092,0.0010952089,0.0022948158,0.25509632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006767106,0.000006436701,0.00013983918,0.00005022658,9.199266e-7,0.000023593317,0.000018817535,0.000008269911,0.000028316299,0.001665904,0.9686508,0.029400034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015961649,0.0000010171418,0.0007875263,0.00004505893,8.99605e-7,0.00003203938,0.000042122767,0.0000073138594,0.000013118674,0.00016508203,0.9989015,0.0000026006742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7665945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91145647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7665945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011728528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03142466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7186822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792118970","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association. Alberta Branch. Mid-winter Meeting.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Geography; Meteorology; Psychology","score_opus":0.016132380556503838,"score_gpt":0.2844367363048786,"score_spread":0.26830435574837475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792118970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001101051,0.011873017,0.0003441293,0.014335003,0.012162584,0.000112293375,0.01571335,0.0009277612,0.9434308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019794249,0.0022227685,0.00017243893,0.00072108244,0.0002427337,0.00001570662,0.0026116485,0.0001294271,0.99190474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992567,0.000021857542,0.000016596814,0.00005781047,0.00043995221,0.00020717339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981376,0.000044597848,0.000028392436,0.00004059143,0.0011691464,0.00057964463],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044490807,0.0012032022,0.0005906797,0.0020984865,0.0044950903,0.00330558,0.0016585081,0.0025563792,0.5466748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001038172,0.000695148,0.00045107707,0.0038452696,0.0005827547,0.0013108972,0.0012757357,0.0021562458,0.35134125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012172569,0.0000050452186,0.00010817276,0.000019517807,6.626084e-7,0.000010850994,0.000011210624,0.000012663844,0.000028518609,0.00020910027,0.98538476,0.014197322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030709825,0.000002264154,0.0018976346,0.000043775588,0.0000015514848,0.000012046108,0.00015938171,0.000027239681,0.000029085255,0.00011087477,0.9977071,0.0000059517733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8450176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9526634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8450176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009149365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01648434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64661336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792288245","doi":"","title":"Ethics, Legal Professionalism and Reconciliation: Enacting Reconciliation Through Civility","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Sociology; Law; Legal ethics; Economic Justice; Harassment; Political science","score_opus":0.24842312770623612,"score_gpt":0.4922463388024223,"score_spread":0.24382321109618618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792288245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11656632,0.0065840594,0.07442245,0.20622604,0.00069247844,0.00036984982,0.000036683985,0.0001558926,0.5949462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962932,0.0011207557,0.013928829,0.0064211222,0.000067734945,0.00011249882,0.000013118527,0.000049910384,0.01535403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95870125,0.027947566,0.00077809754,0.0015209841,0.0057713506,0.005280835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98221177,0.010141405,0.0016404748,0.0015023395,0.0025990994,0.0019047742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03334583,0.00053579564,0.0004965033,0.0022279592,0.028946785,0.019053247,0.0026269022,0.0063437168,0.0025216856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024532853,0.00051746453,0.0004691609,0.0014158391,0.10839542,0.010358376,0.016850024,0.01028735,0.0003413785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050657864,0.000020539163,0.0004803464,0.00006445814,0.000004733293,0.00025325877,0.2045641,0.00027855742,0.0001813167,0.7788733,0.0027533118,0.012521017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016152007,0.000031245858,0.0018267697,0.00053616875,0.000016206304,0.00041103936,0.22528067,0.0010633676,0.001275136,0.44962645,0.319857,0.000059787653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20796926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2995701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20796926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0411699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12275627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41351748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792340284","doi":"","title":"Labour relations: current issues: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C., on December 10 [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continuing education; Current (fluid); Political science; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Medical education; Medicine; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.026882840501317666,"score_gpt":0.3626860527811474,"score_spread":0.33580321227982973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792340284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013568434,0.06015386,0.0010397135,0.39499554,0.04273886,0.0031889807,0.010759688,0.0012258731,0.47232902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020615509,0.015449064,0.0010793343,0.016260568,0.005333824,0.00052436045,0.0046529095,0.00017271374,0.9359119],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995229,0.00005001902,0.000020169713,0.00003024038,0.00016859299,0.00020814266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983333,0.00025894123,0.00005081239,0.000028965116,0.0005417482,0.0007862922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013799716,0.0008303465,0.0005625118,0.0014294854,0.005128152,0.0028114482,0.0013580149,0.0049775415,0.11206681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018784023,0.00046876262,0.00033510628,0.0016827985,0.0008307596,0.0013570007,0.0014692968,0.0025077537,0.028894806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017452836,0.0000313414,0.00022747283,0.00010504578,7.235696e-7,0.0000647989,0.00039169614,0.000025272757,0.00014865088,0.00017539543,0.9790412,0.019770993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010904444,0.000021790354,0.0075260764,0.00028190707,0.0000028627737,0.000034519708,0.0020657901,0.000027108632,0.00010580986,0.0002580742,0.98965317,0.0000119829065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3063778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7297542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69362223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005429778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015385952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.609189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792349664","doi":"","title":"McGill University. Law Library","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Law library; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01656418853008553,"score_gpt":0.2389202118176139,"score_spread":0.22235602328752835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792349664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021343645,0.0009502231,0.00008030796,0.002685347,0.00034105423,0.00005259156,0.0059552346,0.00089499954,0.98882675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011803322,0.0005154292,0.0000810606,0.00095839513,0.00007479883,0.000041812942,0.00073692185,0.00028201795,0.9961293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854374,0.00013835075,0.000059014557,0.00017290148,0.0007827966,0.00030318226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619496,0.00072761945,0.00015772879,0.0005760847,0.001197149,0.0011465152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000967549,0.0018199655,0.0016106218,0.0063195783,0.00884697,0.0105563,0.0037860975,0.006131141,0.9039736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004948688,0.002027529,0.0009380083,0.010011901,0.0024718423,0.0036157335,0.003685077,0.0035849293,0.7146554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001366728,0.00003104655,0.00012404774,0.000109853674,0.0000031161217,0.00005190313,0.000063454674,0.000047471585,0.000046573743,0.005215537,0.9582798,0.036013536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018663051,0.000008504448,0.00093967357,0.00014832453,0.000006241575,0.00001713134,0.00015013218,0.00006121311,0.00007928495,0.0015928393,0.9969585,0.000019479372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55199695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8282992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9039736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01597227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025596824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90128285},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2792382089","doi":"","title":"Student learning guide: a workbook to accompany Canadian law, fourth edition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workbook; Library science; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.024935021043241305,"score_gpt":0.32473435956603647,"score_spread":0.29979933852279517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792382089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006713412,0.0045849504,0.0034589588,0.004236498,0.002702005,0.00040584165,0.006865499,0.0030291278,0.9740457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008965576,0.002251916,0.001932513,0.0006924017,0.00012845539,0.00008446811,0.0017259183,0.00037102864,0.99191684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926,0.000024220793,0.000019326806,0.00004038576,0.0005776104,0.0000784002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820375,0.0001340559,0.000023069892,0.000059957907,0.0013386733,0.00024041947],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058410515,0.0009848136,0.0008908436,0.0034794672,0.004147953,0.004445612,0.002127763,0.0016682738,0.37465405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028528855,0.00056968525,0.0004934352,0.005380182,0.00079941604,0.0027337498,0.0015043525,0.001946017,0.17942424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026768973,0.000011813313,0.000029713197,0.00003928802,2.7084067e-7,0.000014474056,0.0000713852,0.000038885,0.00007202416,0.0014154497,0.9542991,0.044004988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011414143,0.0000026232794,0.00013647281,0.000036111174,6.2571365e-7,0.000014428946,0.00007341298,0.00003157531,0.000033180353,0.00031386997,0.99935216,0.0000044450276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64565235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8613713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37465405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010122306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045501113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8919801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792438641","doi":"","title":"The Manitoba law journal and law reports.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022141107956895986,"score_gpt":0.28425493097171955,"score_spread":0.26211382301482355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792438641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029685448,0.04091998,0.00019356549,0.040565662,0.0063101756,0.00009460214,0.016954474,0.000502018,0.89149106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0064800787,0.010436398,0.00017227988,0.0028495004,0.0006171143,0.000025433785,0.0023716323,0.000118053875,0.9769295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939656,0.00003387432,0.000027022521,0.000053644846,0.00038607497,0.000102740036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969722,0.00044068604,0.0001476721,0.00012966486,0.0017482751,0.0005613985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046095945,0.0006045258,0.00035024338,0.0044338536,0.0045085726,0.0051869145,0.0011382088,0.0017765946,0.25046042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003922613,0.00074299413,0.00019284747,0.008584961,0.0013868706,0.0020094279,0.0009865214,0.0017020912,0.077594616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043707482,0.000010355831,0.00055514515,0.000057025663,0.0000011223533,0.000028483413,0.000095883486,0.000010843145,0.000030975414,0.0021206283,0.98308337,0.014001903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020486175,0.0000022626919,0.0038274748,0.000102501086,0.0000016897493,0.000028942162,0.00040000962,0.000018934143,0.00003815807,0.0003103899,0.99526334,0.0000043002765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71905625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9229603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011738016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031129993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8378736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792554088","doi":"","title":"Canadian directory of public legal information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Business; Internet privacy; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.02863444638895851,"score_gpt":0.29121139873166135,"score_spread":0.26257695234270284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792554088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005252806,0.005423575,0.00021180468,0.0056490675,0.0009675025,0.000107265354,0.06728866,0.0010845305,0.9187423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033852835,0.006815241,0.0005376968,0.0009218128,0.00015451443,0.0000635796,0.016627314,0.00035535387,0.9711391],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683505,0.00006490717,0.00010167826,0.00016494082,0.0022428154,0.00059061154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99161655,0.00051950593,0.00023234561,0.0004687096,0.006056423,0.0011064538],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011482468,0.0015007199,0.0015814775,0.015967362,0.009831744,0.010439292,0.002246561,0.0027568922,0.4849983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074732313,0.0013542817,0.00072932435,0.030961622,0.0017569428,0.0032309056,0.001772557,0.0022975926,0.22751696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002591133,0.0000070114284,0.00010237292,0.000066663815,0.0000011590662,0.0000130736,0.00003571362,0.000021504993,0.000011990376,0.0033786916,0.97964543,0.016713731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022207882,0.0000012428634,0.00083103403,0.000113141556,0.00000286337,0.000011306772,0.00008339203,0.000050376188,0.000028195975,0.000546197,0.99831957,0.000010305266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9634217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9810986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4849983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051607132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18991785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73458743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792669608","doi":"","title":"SETTLEMENT COUNSEL: AN INNOVATIVE STRATEGY FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION OF COMMERCIAL LITIGATION FILES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Negotiation; Accountability; Incentive; Construct (python library); Work (physics); Dispute resolution; Political science; Law; Business; Law and economics; Public relations; Engineering; Economics; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.06023909209695339,"score_gpt":0.4041586855270993,"score_spread":0.34391959343014594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792669608","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12283578,0.0007525619,0.43976605,0.03362955,0.0008839432,0.0032032337,0.0003990275,0.003511461,0.39501834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59294856,0.00052493333,0.26753163,0.0035025957,0.00028925834,0.001790598,0.00021011064,0.00039527577,0.13280705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835385,0.008870266,0.00046025228,0.0012587404,0.004425874,0.0014463993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98848456,0.005402269,0.0010526887,0.001550217,0.0011662737,0.0023440663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020275593,0.00048345444,0.0004310431,0.004285509,0.0132266125,0.012533401,0.0043784333,0.003926046,0.025397701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03783323,0.0005343245,0.00050181145,0.0027611298,0.00572022,0.0095776105,0.01576185,0.003367968,0.0051292693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012892544,0.00044980695,0.0046275402,0.00014848847,0.0000249713,0.0012501677,0.060080945,0.0013638263,0.0030490456,0.43813595,0.072700046,0.41804022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015904933,0.0002931772,0.0036873359,0.0003511739,0.00003776622,0.0019250571,0.062814005,0.008365233,0.002774522,0.13330112,0.78610903,0.0001825615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007619183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021817842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025397701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042179246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035596352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107228875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792948099","doi":"","title":"Employment law: human rights in the workplace: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Human rights; Labour law; Legal education; Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.024716819340825,"score_gpt":0.34653067121736647,"score_spread":0.3218138518765415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792948099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011087928,0.038330086,0.0016533188,0.26768944,0.013145302,0.0015661623,0.002875267,0.00066597393,0.6629865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028635457,0.013423972,0.0015405299,0.016837087,0.002124718,0.00029028326,0.0012838277,0.000121509845,0.93574274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992878,0.000074050986,0.000026625756,0.000042252497,0.00033457312,0.00023462207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987489,0.0003406465,0.00003717306,0.000028909384,0.0004054889,0.00043887462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013534229,0.0006422658,0.0004899596,0.0012091277,0.006152954,0.0032240853,0.0012983629,0.0065738303,0.049747396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002015821,0.000409185,0.0002636256,0.0014365551,0.0016864616,0.0014445508,0.0013580298,0.0033402566,0.010174699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007117272,0.000047847516,0.00027387321,0.00011813127,9.593823e-7,0.00012999805,0.0011841686,0.00006323997,0.0003282923,0.0018873918,0.96210104,0.033857852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065211384,0.000019086725,0.006142025,0.00027201965,0.0000024000246,0.00006756985,0.0030851527,0.000044719032,0.00018085576,0.00083021744,0.98933476,0.000014737561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5442228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87067926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45577723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008963554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022971462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9169228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792983282","doi":"","title":"Employment law and practice: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on November 22, 1989","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Political science; Practice of law; Legal practice; Sociology; Legal profession","score_opus":0.02524264101382983,"score_gpt":0.35242386199202486,"score_spread":0.327181220978195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792983282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022479715,0.013892784,0.0015183119,0.036159523,0.008032172,0.003993684,0.013289238,0.001236374,0.8993982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011077273,0.002380857,0.001056973,0.0010183498,0.00039707313,0.00033676447,0.0022110704,0.000098614946,0.981423],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970275,0.000029565866,0.000013676417,0.000021977898,0.000118309596,0.00011359649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992447,0.00015829632,0.000023795783,0.00002542443,0.0002472569,0.00030051684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082025444,0.00089480623,0.00050733786,0.001585217,0.0033167626,0.0019036843,0.0009058244,0.0021517149,0.17003633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013443481,0.0005647283,0.00023354987,0.0019214995,0.0006351846,0.00083600264,0.0010754828,0.0012723021,0.04653619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047559468,0.000100702884,0.0004610886,0.0001386007,0.0000010028493,0.00013207915,0.0008758849,0.00010152175,0.00056599994,0.00060506177,0.9365477,0.0604228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014765116,0.0000440673,0.010370498,0.00016556858,0.0000020436294,0.000041395855,0.0014351441,0.000051383922,0.00022329995,0.000276607,0.9873645,0.000010837866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22945318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6812089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99558854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044114767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008246138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5688282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793060235","doi":"10.7202/1043165ar","title":"Follow the Drinking Gourd: Our Road to Teaching Critical Race Theory and Slavery and the Law, Contemplatively, at McGill","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Gourd; Race (biology); Law; Critical race theory; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.059374484762862896,"score_gpt":0.406693800985672,"score_spread":0.3473193162228091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793060235","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004605889,0.017869877,0.004361442,0.8802847,0.003192442,0.000043161246,0.000050548366,0.00014824807,0.0894437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35626164,0.023390021,0.015008902,0.30185574,0.0048431386,0.00039931128,0.00008712637,0.00075980835,0.29739434],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419045,0.003564426,0.000082613755,0.0002750188,0.0011644248,0.00072306156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98821485,0.0068565514,0.00057988387,0.00043164162,0.0012131687,0.0027040336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007190285,0.0005598144,0.00036452437,0.00088274723,0.011533759,0.007394053,0.001743206,0.00785544,0.02095702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018046482,0.00048692472,0.0003613948,0.0007964757,0.025811536,0.012896413,0.0075500705,0.014488143,0.0032652416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029127135,0.00007165955,0.0005699639,0.00016360838,0.0000050812027,0.00017068988,0.025543269,0.00013641093,0.00047730297,0.2141493,0.6996647,0.05901879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000307188,0.00004057434,0.001681957,0.00083345256,0.000008247417,0.00010110716,0.022563942,0.00031747358,0.0008613115,0.20359586,0.76990646,0.000058968086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15780737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3396659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84219265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016434975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023651546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31377763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793147541","doi":"","title":"Collective bargaining: materials prepared for a continuing legal education seminar and workshop held in Vancouver, B.C. on April 29 [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collective bargaining; Political science; Continuing education; Library science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Engineering; Media studies; Sociology; Medical education; Law; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.029028308305202,"score_gpt":0.3334812453784956,"score_spread":0.30445293707329363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793147541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016142957,0.007981726,0.0025190879,0.05170655,0.02325865,0.0031068518,0.007020089,0.0015635467,0.8867005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018154413,0.0014686962,0.0011000901,0.0014518407,0.0010473696,0.0005796515,0.0016635043,0.00014384824,0.9743905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995759,0.000047984046,0.000010196643,0.00003756181,0.00013740537,0.00019085546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916303,0.00010196559,0.000018332945,0.00002506304,0.00022609417,0.00046551545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001451529,0.0009639871,0.0005644517,0.00082846545,0.006124386,0.0028054016,0.0012830751,0.0028013117,0.20697588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014211595,0.00048151845,0.00036197927,0.0010223006,0.0007883733,0.0010024738,0.0014971438,0.0024245498,0.049267635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005537588,0.000075535325,0.00014901339,0.000065790846,0.0000012501027,0.000085634216,0.00060801086,0.000070990354,0.00031092175,0.0006561475,0.97720635,0.020715041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026466822,0.000039884362,0.0034261327,0.00009837613,0.0000022331349,0.00001794488,0.0016170152,0.00004776543,0.00019505019,0.00048010834,0.9940363,0.000012672872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15309209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54326415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8469079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048035323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010112215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6924033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793188166","doi":"","title":"Anger's digest of Canadian law.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Anger; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.031852678353316774,"score_gpt":0.2905271906646033,"score_spread":0.2586745123112865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793188166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053709943,0.07497515,0.00069002,0.046544183,0.00967371,0.000064192136,0.004756633,0.00041522947,0.8623438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005164713,0.019024035,0.00060782844,0.0062493216,0.0012472435,0.000027715967,0.0013017949,0.00014931588,0.9662281],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979615,0.00006919259,0.0000411599,0.00010416369,0.0015539074,0.00027004353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838173,0.00016711773,0.000040054587,0.00005824119,0.0011665847,0.0001862286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007921631,0.0010173885,0.0005079522,0.0051752185,0.007853957,0.00591254,0.0013467266,0.002547211,0.14694841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037958366,0.00049659563,0.0005825692,0.0072394777,0.0021472292,0.0025232742,0.0011671832,0.0026726718,0.02994462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023364466,0.000002228399,0.000034360433,0.000025459345,6.9319356e-7,0.00001234403,0.0000859053,0.000017635393,0.000016180396,0.009196062,0.9804803,0.010126532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.6940146e-7,5.7493924e-7,0.00031734197,0.00004398046,0.0000010261019,0.00001754625,0.0000947385,0.0000123854925,0.000014143247,0.00086015055,0.9986333,0.0000040237737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94720465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9813494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14694841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05427214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055560585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4915914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793226504","doi":"10.29173/alr2458","title":"Access to Justice Online: Are Canadian Court Websites Accessible for Users With Visual Impairments?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Manitoba; Dalhousie University; McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Internet privacy; Public relations; Web accessibility; Political science; Legal research; Business; Sociology; Law; The Internet; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.07519737862806318,"score_gpt":0.46644438941291316,"score_spread":0.39124701078484997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793226504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44705996,0.028465688,0.0008259837,0.1283426,0.0004547631,0.00040719533,0.0021760839,0.0000970201,0.3921708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645038,0.015039616,0.0007944296,0.007377696,0.00006977462,0.000093707386,0.00036456107,0.000028255528,0.011728112],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378806,0.0012180448,0.00019456049,0.0003266526,0.0030471873,0.0014255719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97317964,0.0077032936,0.0026855653,0.0006868405,0.011878279,0.0038664325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005561738,0.0001576156,0.00033043488,0.002891516,0.006776622,0.0065895002,0.001415198,0.0012896323,0.009461519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041490693,0.00020094361,0.0003364503,0.0049441536,0.0036519782,0.003989613,0.0019943642,0.0015237137,0.00049200805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022508697,0.00040674736,0.15968904,0.0029703777,0.00010434407,0.0012252581,0.08861673,0.00025013217,0.0007677786,0.054706838,0.1542337,0.53680396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064921835,0.00012084291,0.45687112,0.0069880374,0.00026385303,0.00059201027,0.12444382,0.0005134567,0.0006144577,0.0053405743,0.40403497,0.0001520016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9419519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97291464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02708535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07823772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1965189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793369440","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Association (psychology); Geography; Philosophy; Meteorology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.013849189390868799,"score_gpt":0.26834572320452066,"score_spread":0.25449653381365184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793369440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042445233,0.0016950114,0.00023193745,0.009084076,0.0036400845,0.00006130593,0.0025782827,0.0003157482,0.98196906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012668686,0.00054738694,0.00013051768,0.0010828451,0.00016734685,0.000015730748,0.0005143433,0.000054413882,0.9962205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966426,0.00009704387,0.00007352761,0.00035119604,0.002220451,0.0006151726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945673,0.00022700588,0.00009920142,0.00030561755,0.004007649,0.0007932023],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011222311,0.00098901,0.0008111646,0.0041822437,0.010417006,0.006789485,0.0018766596,0.0044437195,0.58429265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00526198,0.00084321544,0.00082574243,0.0038132712,0.0015042637,0.0015789812,0.002174123,0.0038483888,0.30462748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007100802,0.000012777203,0.00013428934,0.000023457904,0.0000016495136,0.0000293421,0.00002785153,0.00002141843,0.000036719695,0.007704582,0.96901524,0.022985468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023873768,0.0000015510458,0.0003572226,0.000024018704,0.000001646559,0.00001363291,0.00003899684,0.000023732924,0.000020647387,0.00040339353,0.99910885,0.000004038618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7386316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88511664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41570735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017149989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06219003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59295607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793553894","doi":"","title":"A legal collection for non-legal libraries in British Columbia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.016039180437182003,"score_gpt":0.2684259712689999,"score_spread":0.2523867908318179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793553894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04006725,0.019077081,0.0015189752,0.040381134,0.0051038554,0.00086827873,0.07057253,0.0030160674,0.81939495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038102716,0.0070823445,0.0024142743,0.0018490877,0.00021953108,0.00015552052,0.01014277,0.000519183,0.9395146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998934,0.00005894963,0.000071607,0.00006253326,0.00059965614,0.00027322836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942027,0.00057777297,0.00017801496,0.00024547963,0.0032271077,0.0015689292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009027812,0.0003740443,0.00052652677,0.007852407,0.016037919,0.007885905,0.0015075053,0.0016061394,0.1322839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041735806,0.00062273064,0.0003089454,0.016743455,0.0016213161,0.0019879672,0.0020193367,0.0016719708,0.018539943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015598525,0.000026673908,0.0011964048,0.00018925162,0.0000024017943,0.00020177454,0.0008577762,0.00006196808,0.0002226187,0.004407382,0.9522544,0.040563773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040587197,0.000003225772,0.008206447,0.000110440444,0.0000031990392,0.000049300965,0.0015434369,0.00007053684,0.000105479936,0.00018923194,0.9896969,0.000017663613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9626238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1322839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04037182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17205603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44253373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793587972","doi":"","title":"A catalogue of law books prepared with especial reference to the requirements of the legal profession of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal profession","score_opus":0.034704034200687794,"score_gpt":0.3013796978057987,"score_spread":0.2666756636051109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793587972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011263832,0.021584725,0.001036067,0.0045866063,0.0022998047,0.00035989136,0.03351688,0.001586499,0.9339031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022006782,0.0127232205,0.0015001663,0.0011569078,0.00023340946,0.00009344756,0.010854594,0.0003043934,0.97093314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923885,0.000018979958,0.000026777823,0.000039666684,0.0005620463,0.00011375892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819833,0.00015104703,0.00004859084,0.000052106057,0.0012967609,0.00025316255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031258393,0.0010201688,0.0011073864,0.0076266686,0.004794778,0.005128354,0.0016323583,0.001359123,0.23449418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017679007,0.0005983958,0.00044120816,0.022433063,0.0009672858,0.0017960396,0.0007245965,0.0012867147,0.07607269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053387766,0.000012383692,0.00008561967,0.00015487036,0.0000015781875,0.000025285412,0.00008916063,0.000058901125,0.00012983031,0.0026030205,0.96500576,0.03182818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002062632,0.0000024884243,0.0010092317,0.00010839072,0.000001923819,0.00002256693,0.000099043784,0.000029255909,0.000031237694,0.00035862543,0.99832803,0.000007211621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8846095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9678887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23449418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017190866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051983975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7844612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793755744","doi":"","title":"Law Society of Saskatchewan. Libraries.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029728194085609037,"score_gpt":0.2975015452332353,"score_spread":0.26777335114762624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793755744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014003695,0.001807126,0.00038872712,0.008621566,0.00095632655,0.00011386096,0.03934603,0.001421109,0.9459449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003375317,0.0015920355,0.00035982972,0.0014767438,0.00003642055,0.000047443857,0.0046321005,0.00028538588,0.9881947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998806,0.00012159019,0.00009353714,0.0002240525,0.00047103522,0.00028377748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960116,0.0006217038,0.0001476148,0.0005677156,0.0018758144,0.0007755802],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076971314,0.0010180465,0.0008652647,0.0037800737,0.004712193,0.00691567,0.001971328,0.0034073403,0.7580998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034633593,0.0012382676,0.0005580644,0.00951089,0.0015198751,0.0034307714,0.0033394436,0.0028632297,0.6574371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000475108,0.000054240518,0.0012463944,0.00027175402,0.0000113852275,0.00015996085,0.00016069783,0.00008312688,0.0003204223,0.005870769,0.85084313,0.14093067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000140937655,0.0000049582786,0.003181979,0.00022934031,0.0000064398455,0.000043731314,0.00057355367,0.00006284176,0.00020687204,0.001265507,0.99439186,0.000018958506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65590644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8643557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98577476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014225254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033831798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793867605","doi":"","title":"Ontario Human Rights Commission","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Human rights; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.04189639077854728,"score_gpt":0.33815660005192294,"score_spread":0.29626020927337565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793867605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00146331,0.0021994314,0.00026183447,0.020300288,0.0014708617,0.00019260874,0.005729098,0.0002301576,0.9681524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028695953,0.00052271923,0.0002037677,0.002139474,0.000076529504,0.000043402357,0.0005412195,0.000052483614,0.9935508],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928235,0.00031485668,0.00018456942,0.0005548599,0.00464477,0.0014775294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915855,0.00067595585,0.00018953356,0.0005653804,0.005935126,0.0010485436],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024739748,0.00083896174,0.00090782635,0.0040237927,0.014564581,0.0095188115,0.001821797,0.004926686,0.31200695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008314178,0.0012858816,0.0007921612,0.0034875087,0.0021638267,0.0020142233,0.0024471101,0.004016354,0.06589584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019720504,0.000016986638,0.00039283477,0.00006073897,0.000005770914,0.00007929482,0.00026441438,0.00004484402,0.000064738975,0.032390613,0.9544317,0.01222835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059884223,0.0000018092535,0.0007313508,0.000035000736,0.0000038360236,0.000014519201,0.00014341067,0.000036134308,0.00003968638,0.000742718,0.9982382,0.000007353371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92969805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97361755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31200695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053898793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18491337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98133856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793956612","doi":"","title":"General practice potpourri, 1988: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on June 15, 1988","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Potpourri; Continuing education; Library science; Political science; Law; Media studies; Medical education; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.01518502898252746,"score_gpt":0.31433383616643645,"score_spread":0.299148807183909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793956612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024022926,0.06078655,0.00143043,0.102287,0.016091233,0.0034819501,0.039579574,0.001291931,0.7510284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026945168,0.013769961,0.0018424093,0.005343878,0.001358977,0.0008761372,0.0076164524,0.00019194178,0.942055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996704,0.000048785496,0.000021620044,0.000026634936,0.00013684815,0.00009581963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991683,0.00021164112,0.000041372816,0.000022127286,0.0002466824,0.0003099844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032802,0.00071184605,0.00035503207,0.0017206863,0.00244657,0.001762159,0.0010442844,0.00221466,0.11041599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022326452,0.00056587195,0.00015951338,0.002566,0.00074548175,0.0011524458,0.0010902901,0.0016529543,0.033638623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029559693,0.00002577345,0.0004076774,0.00013718582,7.2966117e-7,0.000068731366,0.00066515757,0.000040376504,0.000100949874,0.00031718414,0.95914835,0.03905829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016496768,0.000025912423,0.014494835,0.00030611063,0.0000018263956,0.000046323945,0.0013921539,0.000023902398,0.00006944538,0.00025203565,0.98336315,0.000007723464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25153798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70728356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.748462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059090294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01017385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5001477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794014058","doi":"","title":"An outline of basic research materials for Canadian law students","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Engineering ethics; Political science; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.09057202237034609,"score_gpt":0.42931818033099156,"score_spread":0.33874615796064544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794014058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004356498,0.0054460797,0.014694602,0.012328658,0.0027021621,0.008561565,0.043554213,0.0033319136,0.90502435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013340892,0.00990704,0.04962124,0.002876951,0.0005888837,0.009158149,0.019995438,0.00057932007,0.8939321],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826545,0.00012712214,0.00007804836,0.000100504745,0.0011272102,0.00030170713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993291,0.0012300276,0.000121042154,0.00031956,0.0042502806,0.0007880973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032823528,0.0012690193,0.0009795406,0.009369295,0.0066990424,0.005299677,0.0028155057,0.0016752421,0.2521933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074469205,0.0008746714,0.0007005192,0.013505676,0.0016073863,0.0027584971,0.0016932446,0.0022813678,0.07240053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006132115,0.0003050416,0.00062205043,0.00085631845,0.0000024789988,0.00011663898,0.0015606695,0.00030038544,0.002236928,0.029363606,0.73958343,0.22499102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009821349,0.000043991222,0.0028321454,0.0002219114,0.000004010662,0.000042115014,0.0013203624,0.00010710771,0.0006557515,0.0032766366,0.9914655,0.000020716467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6385222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.855956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3614778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026673859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07875039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8436706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794104527","doi":"","title":"Labour law and practice: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on April 14 & 15, 1983","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.021227529034373995,"score_gpt":0.34182199660595514,"score_spread":0.32059446757158117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794104527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02003759,0.01751306,0.001740081,0.032842163,0.008894688,0.0043315985,0.016303603,0.0012015058,0.8971358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009855289,0.003092277,0.0011408678,0.000912056,0.0005157893,0.00044559923,0.0029128913,0.0001289967,0.98099613],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971026,0.000033642424,0.000015809806,0.000022528115,0.00011736875,0.00010032764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991041,0.0002456845,0.000028391592,0.000032023672,0.00029407136,0.000295817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090369344,0.0010901977,0.0006157655,0.0020360402,0.003122645,0.0020172833,0.0009319236,0.0020221302,0.18114446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015571951,0.00063971494,0.0002833234,0.0028428289,0.0007919246,0.0010468808,0.0011150579,0.0012602534,0.05436425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051268365,0.00008356766,0.00036603407,0.00015906522,9.793613e-7,0.00012428292,0.0009139841,0.00013418954,0.0005892549,0.00070639077,0.9378417,0.059029274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014160974,0.00004491387,0.009566834,0.00019452066,0.0000020197783,0.000044966328,0.0013198139,0.00005593952,0.00024566372,0.00041433953,0.98808515,0.000011613736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21370429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6080899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7862957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048971195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008254299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6059886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794196834","doi":"","title":"Canada's legal environment : its history, institutions, and principles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05049764926908968,"score_gpt":0.26520400494524765,"score_spread":0.21470635567615798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794196834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006195531,0.049162842,0.0012105524,0.10211989,0.0014882241,0.0000717688,0.0019047578,0.00024307545,0.8376034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22302352,0.06538037,0.0042863437,0.026592834,0.00091184536,0.00011969195,0.0011168828,0.00025557767,0.678313],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996567,0.00015538721,0.000050063998,0.0001658027,0.0021022856,0.0009595271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972466,0.00035347327,0.00011797617,0.000072075716,0.0014941866,0.0007157374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00101457,0.0005438759,0.000485193,0.004353039,0.017245784,0.015709518,0.0019843169,0.0032601708,0.024382936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003948969,0.00047401854,0.00036581958,0.009614745,0.011167363,0.0027691242,0.001972025,0.0037591048,0.0018481778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007669668,0.00001993839,0.0011659667,0.00017894589,0.000006428458,0.000115447554,0.0036367967,0.00024853196,0.00007713021,0.40899536,0.5307664,0.05478136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033127155,0.0000030854294,0.002577491,0.00024586104,0.000005020379,0.00003560785,0.0020464645,0.00009379504,0.000043030555,0.00860198,0.9863236,0.000020858284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16355112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16355112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43125442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97016215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794287810","doi":"10.7202/1043166ar","title":"Kenneth M. Smookler, Farr &amp; Beyond: Lawyers for the Otherworldly (Toronto: Wall &amp; Emerson, 2016), p 118, ISBN 978-1-895131-26-0","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Art; Theology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.07585044040862375,"score_gpt":0.39133732355541206,"score_spread":0.3154868831467883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794287810","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008589795,0.5529807,0.0016135206,0.16763915,0.0054076645,0.000045190332,0.0005931284,0.00034833685,0.27051333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013585043,0.22059594,0.0021188173,0.014887869,0.0018374603,0.00005145253,0.00035092482,0.00032740907,0.746245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915373,0.00018367819,0.000053126416,0.00010531648,0.00041555712,0.00008862839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985556,0.00062663574,0.00015522345,0.00005279983,0.00026833048,0.00034140027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011035206,0.0008183589,0.00039646143,0.0017029803,0.002376604,0.0055894265,0.00093519955,0.0053806566,0.12459742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029698561,0.0008033579,0.00020753077,0.0026001218,0.002063636,0.0092322705,0.0017412356,0.0032427239,0.055915978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004001546,0.000004842287,0.000070531736,0.00010045904,0.0000011113981,0.000020160423,0.00048227693,0.000010521016,0.000049909384,0.005711821,0.9590598,0.0344847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002357329,0.0000031731165,0.00063927996,0.0002994898,0.0000018021258,0.00007677229,0.00089517405,0.00002073436,0.00005550523,0.0025930265,0.99540615,0.0000066293373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05922307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22209053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94077694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052438164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067663663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41681993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794359827","doi":"","title":"Checklists of law reports and statutes in Canadian law libraries = Listes de controle des recueils de jurisprudence et [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Statute; Political science","score_opus":0.020901601668822753,"score_gpt":0.310716355905386,"score_spread":0.2898147542365632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794359827","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042092945,0.0030184179,0.033078864,0.006353946,0.0013847696,0.014142774,0.65894186,0.015096147,0.22589031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11628251,0.008405638,0.24972041,0.0025428,0.00039581978,0.013342548,0.44314653,0.0031197555,0.1630439],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889314,0.0014494064,0.0030421528,0.00038658117,0.0054222667,0.0007682035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.876498,0.02050205,0.012783001,0.0049119387,0.0813711,0.0039339038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011008798,0.0009218467,0.00074055715,0.042750057,0.005799111,0.003766371,0.002480143,0.0010485712,0.049240258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05454729,0.00076784356,0.0006479007,0.032744374,0.0012390811,0.0023880033,0.0018095779,0.0012170972,0.014704104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014225814,0.0001325495,0.016246848,0.0035211784,0.000023515848,0.00022531154,0.0032284502,0.00065513334,0.0019486421,0.012955279,0.7259312,0.23498966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037619284,0.00005014821,0.044936623,0.0019819075,0.000030056073,0.00014363613,0.0018825113,0.00035743313,0.0014729114,0.0013598619,0.9476096,0.00013769568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67993784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8393714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32006216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0138283465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08558929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64389414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794431703","doi":"","title":"Legal materials for high school libraries in Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.01955110351883971,"score_gpt":0.282564454396141,"score_spread":0.26301335087730127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794431703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20794836,0.007772312,0.0006126403,0.021608992,0.00082036573,0.00042446877,0.010892219,0.0019964234,0.7479242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15691571,0.0022298053,0.0015948015,0.0009814405,0.00007670898,0.00005015402,0.0022101838,0.00016946769,0.8357718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987293,0.000090447,0.00003701255,0.000070069145,0.00066963694,0.0004035948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964141,0.00042818583,0.00012822277,0.000097323726,0.001135123,0.0017971356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084863533,0.00028503625,0.0002692203,0.004038465,0.015634766,0.007048664,0.0020632795,0.001609152,0.14260916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002759359,0.00050104794,0.00023010926,0.006246256,0.0014179886,0.0014665157,0.0024753935,0.0010015067,0.012875444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015869553,0.00043478535,0.01704488,0.0005230711,0.00000957302,0.0012385339,0.01079909,0.0007117451,0.0014820863,0.01768865,0.6610774,0.28883147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002332703,0.000059485625,0.084627844,0.00025566216,0.000012129633,0.00019043333,0.022246605,0.00038794088,0.0007777441,0.0008314605,0.8905452,0.00004221611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9469512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99018246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14260916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048977163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1423821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47707516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794571763","doi":"","title":"Our Canadian legal heritage","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03211121276101706,"score_gpt":0.30900518993353127,"score_spread":0.2768939771725142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794571763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085319945,0.0114936195,0.00035155666,0.036424898,0.004772911,0.00003726931,0.0018669955,0.00030364838,0.9438958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0067714183,0.0062727653,0.00056243985,0.0029233424,0.00032343622,0.000015523947,0.00056577724,0.000109692526,0.9824556],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738115,0.00010332224,0.000041802614,0.00017931024,0.0017038314,0.0005905214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970958,0.00010791522,0.000044919652,0.00016147213,0.001768804,0.0008210552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012350532,0.0010129532,0.00063068,0.0047916886,0.021852741,0.015139968,0.001962092,0.0028261112,0.25226584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038821911,0.0005949416,0.00061876,0.006816494,0.004924653,0.0030389805,0.0035967543,0.0041399007,0.049041357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025869747,0.0000052602286,0.00014141346,0.00002857422,0.0000012672679,0.00003227537,0.00028100554,0.000020681544,0.000027355252,0.023335198,0.9496208,0.026503598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.560617e-7,4.4619102e-7,0.00017841399,0.000022190397,8.784226e-7,0.000010864003,0.00025240795,0.000006665537,0.000010507954,0.0005172421,0.9989973,0.0000028324287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97418064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99114096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25226584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06175077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18327728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8439133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794616657","doi":"","title":"Introduction to law in Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.015551794119098846,"score_gpt":0.26935837655549905,"score_spread":0.2538065824364002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794616657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012218233,0.13444456,0.0011632313,0.037598312,0.0048521967,0.00009224727,0.006071387,0.0005208471,0.81403524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015557333,0.071298674,0.0016420821,0.008350654,0.0008986043,0.000052166903,0.0021370903,0.00022104965,0.8998423],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991505,0.00003341797,0.000023940236,0.00006468884,0.0005465843,0.00018090222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878806,0.0001259063,0.000027059745,0.000026228854,0.00073747523,0.0002953142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042314897,0.00075687806,0.0004944076,0.004256181,0.006727624,0.005338213,0.0011710598,0.0018444336,0.13039583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018089552,0.00040921447,0.00037023073,0.007923348,0.0023424113,0.002008872,0.0011508842,0.002057589,0.018658461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003235739,0.000008024464,0.0001916485,0.00009169431,0.0000013154447,0.000033089822,0.0002780508,0.00007695521,0.00003500088,0.016145283,0.94561636,0.037519302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.870982e-7,0.0000014998985,0.0010528215,0.00012448871,0.0000014173153,0.000030785588,0.00027109557,0.00003335682,0.000018042478,0.0015246733,0.9969351,0.0000057829907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9726523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94444704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05555294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104767576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4362175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794791225","doi":"","title":"Is There a Lawyer in the House? the Declining Role of Lawyers in Elected Office","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Salary; Legislature; Law; Economic Justice; CITES; Politics; Political science; Nova scotia; Legislation; Position (finance); Sociology; Economics; History","score_opus":0.0766365479764911,"score_gpt":0.39478389071211967,"score_spread":0.31814734273562856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794791225","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0891787,0.5125724,0.00022541526,0.28323883,0.0035507642,0.00006064089,0.00022401864,0.000019386966,0.11092989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71993834,0.19128211,0.00038369413,0.037219126,0.0017711155,0.000025518559,0.00017087096,0.000024422869,0.049184635],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936998,0.0014377051,0.00015829636,0.00047205095,0.0020548848,0.0021773342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873704,0.0031866636,0.0017230384,0.00018978282,0.00492824,0.0026018936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048175235,0.00013001024,0.00040852342,0.0022339267,0.0049240477,0.004873292,0.0016501648,0.0020725194,0.006111681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015645117,0.00024310256,0.00020941054,0.002899461,0.004313244,0.0015290158,0.00084405707,0.0019964145,0.00077326957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019216939,0.0002272722,0.050853677,0.0042133494,0.00012986777,0.0014724537,0.01905937,0.00029771312,0.001201995,0.13430002,0.3792382,0.40881395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043255168,0.00008294531,0.20900726,0.003151376,0.00009658129,0.00038005406,0.024102451,0.00009538483,0.00032700368,0.0021153858,0.76055706,0.00004123105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8801861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9570218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8801861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04543565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06404136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3296603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794875334","doi":"","title":"Canadian legal studies.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.043064235401484824,"score_gpt":0.3377222671098045,"score_spread":0.2946580317083197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794875334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046363196,0.042915512,0.00010863415,0.011943078,0.0013611224,0.000035032353,0.015819427,0.000174411,0.92717916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0072781653,0.021263083,0.00028324532,0.0018502504,0.00023033524,0.000050901253,0.004127898,0.00017384262,0.9647422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998541,0.000070314636,0.000053006617,0.00014558114,0.0008894573,0.0003006637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803656,0.00020284724,0.00006309568,0.00013051802,0.0012863915,0.00028061477],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007078666,0.0012507847,0.0009804369,0.0047086785,0.009837972,0.006812115,0.0019244399,0.0027943621,0.3567583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035607321,0.001260589,0.00048562244,0.015278049,0.0019959519,0.0037173,0.0017979428,0.0026874281,0.11214385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047735075,0.000006414403,0.0001600153,0.000101742175,0.0000015605086,0.00001777505,0.00015420339,0.000025360265,0.000013574164,0.011129567,0.96048343,0.02790144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018256676,8.930135e-7,0.0010962525,0.00014658381,0.0000019921943,0.000014144505,0.00029094846,0.000014587601,0.000016800475,0.0007702118,0.9976407,0.000005141683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96053624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98796684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3567583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04273271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053754736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9175062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795078382","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Report Series & Unreported Cases","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Library science; Political science; Computer science; Geology","score_opus":0.2429803304840647,"score_gpt":0.4719495219106914,"score_spread":0.2289691914266267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795078382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010791792,0.0042747543,0.0019798751,0.012627357,0.002045157,0.0015804417,0.11257765,0.0029596582,0.8608758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029097185,0.005284795,0.0048726946,0.0024706498,0.00018667745,0.0006808145,0.03684936,0.0010977273,0.9456476],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807304,0.0010702461,0.0013544698,0.0006010821,0.014427878,0.0018159861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9128455,0.010973979,0.0015783304,0.003633639,0.06790524,0.003063361],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009636031,0.0019170986,0.0015995116,0.03152083,0.014615937,0.013199045,0.0063111726,0.006158015,0.31510186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05215806,0.0025404259,0.0014575759,0.037527595,0.003684853,0.00706781,0.0033435537,0.004003893,0.13675474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042908678,0.000011131384,0.00010654588,0.0000927937,9.888837e-7,0.000010833799,0.00009225862,0.00003625155,0.000014398091,0.0023237064,0.9870335,0.010273267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055376117,0.0000032984012,0.0016626548,0.00037000777,0.000006684472,0.000027354057,0.00051724457,0.00008632512,0.00011956196,0.0009310336,0.99623775,0.000032498123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95771617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9829585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31510186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05794981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2994513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97692406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795133798","doi":"","title":"Public Servants Disclosure Protection Tribunal Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Business; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.07919209207967998,"score_gpt":0.2962641434082387,"score_spread":0.21707205132855872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795133798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016592886,0.004717867,0.0008351927,0.20636961,0.010559895,0.0007333557,0.0046381303,0.00049114885,0.75506186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03170308,0.0012996191,0.0003907657,0.027501043,0.00058664684,0.00011572105,0.0005823772,0.000078637306,0.9377422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882167,0.00040648482,0.00029141465,0.00083152036,0.0056002084,0.004653625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797815,0.0024236976,0.000413059,0.00056041713,0.012552754,0.00426863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00421725,0.0006681949,0.0009934277,0.003229031,0.0278611,0.012554901,0.0037311087,0.013757052,0.07639547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016923113,0.0011061281,0.00096182624,0.0027520393,0.0026656648,0.0019956117,0.0030455466,0.013288299,0.008989612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037711397,0.0000686983,0.0016171682,0.000077211575,0.000012931733,0.000273672,0.00087367656,0.00010641479,0.00020499156,0.05856107,0.9201462,0.018020203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031557593,0.000017702272,0.00460399,0.00013558024,0.000021963266,0.00004843912,0.0013085917,0.00031219263,0.00026632292,0.0017841778,0.9914308,0.0000386942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9793001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9888164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08444784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08444784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32427946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6127148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795212457","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v12i1.3751","title":"Hydra: A Creative Training Tool for Critical Legal Advocacy and Ethics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Keele University; Queen's University Belfast; McGill University; University of Victoria; Queen's University; Georgetown University","keywords":"Improvisation; Creativity; Variety (cybernetics); Legal education; Lernaean Hydra; Openness to experience; Public relations; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science; Social psychology; Visual arts; Art","score_opus":0.2370880729367155,"score_gpt":0.5437583699785463,"score_spread":0.3066702970418308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795212457","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050403487,0.0008848135,0.8088461,0.009033894,0.0014115345,0.0031302243,0.0007477831,0.0148857245,0.11065641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15345825,0.00059708446,0.78847224,0.0021346577,0.0003104888,0.0045611905,0.0007843067,0.0020523604,0.047629483],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939328,0.003874039,0.00023758902,0.0004961778,0.0010662836,0.00039318067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807091,0.014953882,0.0004737392,0.001653074,0.000632809,0.0015773681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008326414,0.0013879535,0.0005282253,0.002449727,0.002036642,0.0048933565,0.0035814526,0.0025231685,0.02418941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021229109,0.0006261243,0.00093077664,0.00070328417,0.0067584645,0.005137081,0.01486478,0.0034335682,0.006340748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005966528,0.0013228419,0.002657113,0.002923259,0.00007201377,0.0020798435,0.093629286,0.00491881,0.025405267,0.20371786,0.12939095,0.5332861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022999464,0.0005186337,0.0017715808,0.0015765048,0.00003417597,0.0025085742,0.01806785,0.009979071,0.010301537,0.119342245,0.8354853,0.00018467059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032191494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000904028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02418941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013596623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00260611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08092165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795286551","doi":"10.11575/prism/29668","title":"Effective Indigenous Terminology in Canadian Legal Research for the Arctic","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Arctic; Indigenous; Library science; Scholarship; The arctic; Political science; Theme (computing); Sociology; Social science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.25057892014462224,"score_gpt":0.5526182819665785,"score_spread":0.30203936182195623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795286551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29335445,0.033695627,0.023792682,0.087591104,0.0018603597,0.0007540052,0.00093170814,0.00037041423,0.5576496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9153775,0.013795474,0.03438451,0.0043030614,0.00017168188,0.00029381717,0.00035368485,0.00020568765,0.031114703],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712993,0.010714096,0.0021434668,0.0016660447,0.010879637,0.0032974475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9521219,0.015290013,0.0024952088,0.0027731268,0.023245728,0.004074062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030943114,0.00045098722,0.0005969742,0.015891977,0.041677598,0.022574918,0.0033429405,0.0020251917,0.0047996817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045179315,0.00051278796,0.00044410577,0.02494901,0.03573199,0.011682836,0.01109376,0.0027969822,0.000553541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003524854,0.000028314678,0.005413339,0.00067759986,0.000009637288,0.0005888064,0.53744745,0.0002477103,0.001196816,0.2973258,0.016916554,0.14011276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007245595,0.000027147813,0.012029288,0.0016735896,0.00003889049,0.00036488916,0.41483608,0.00034747677,0.0007871866,0.025105877,0.544665,0.00011738011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9544048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97624797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16328652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16328652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35451415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97046906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795378795","doi":"10.29173/alr1307","title":"Expert Evidence: The Ethical Responsibility of the Legal Profession","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Legal ethics; Engineering ethics; Criminal responsibility; Criminal law; Engineering","score_opus":0.0970302656051674,"score_gpt":0.47618621640042236,"score_spread":0.37915595079525494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795378795","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004932804,0.1720665,0.030995065,0.66463655,0.0045261486,0.00005449415,0.000021370133,0.000042624768,0.122724466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48602703,0.15522204,0.033801932,0.24707842,0.008878736,0.0002654522,0.000045631798,0.00009132816,0.068589404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9355483,0.044445783,0.0017787182,0.0015485771,0.0149185555,0.0017600723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88039523,0.10057375,0.0046527283,0.0026111554,0.0094204275,0.002346807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03764771,0.00039744755,0.0006258446,0.002722176,0.0040671006,0.0093865935,0.0018192562,0.011042163,0.0022493396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08713923,0.00032136793,0.00036902088,0.002021428,0.022255603,0.0076082777,0.004244603,0.0068405243,0.00071177207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013300178,0.00002452804,0.00082364667,0.00050386693,0.000023930279,0.00039745093,0.0055027627,0.00034381376,0.0001372073,0.83159995,0.06885156,0.09177811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013404228,0.000036251833,0.0013260618,0.0032700836,0.000018904,0.00087268534,0.01012774,0.00036766523,0.00025302634,0.5319856,0.45169616,0.00003243927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010053517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01956712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03764771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062306295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019902546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19910252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795379623","doi":"","title":"PROFESSIONAL EXCELLENCE THROUGH COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Lifelong learning; Continuing professional development; Meaning (existential); Professional development; Public relations; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Legal profession; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.13792286919365468,"score_gpt":0.445149747260576,"score_spread":0.3072268780669213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795379623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008557051,0.08100491,0.021916917,0.13051063,0.0013584703,0.00027974436,0.00008673153,0.0001263226,0.7561593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72422767,0.12025773,0.036795266,0.023544952,0.0010898772,0.00028004168,0.00015228856,0.00011129317,0.09354097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98394805,0.005421117,0.000531871,0.0010222441,0.006999562,0.0020772736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855226,0.004192221,0.0010536538,0.0009291646,0.0057666567,0.00253562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01599976,0.0004981789,0.0003879594,0.0041400874,0.004520777,0.007658138,0.001975177,0.0027706786,0.0050363503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01866622,0.00018468944,0.00038770764,0.0019138831,0.017292647,0.004015862,0.006907426,0.0031096144,0.001362799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060806783,0.000034547298,0.0006138284,0.0007533449,0.000016682705,0.00008345682,0.004302073,0.00029592623,0.0001990021,0.7884823,0.036969163,0.16824345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012192566,0.000038780687,0.002743045,0.002547985,0.000017549979,0.0002451162,0.004060402,0.00029840498,0.0005101358,0.1570946,0.8324031,0.000028714396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20111963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25365052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20111963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02682163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08287924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.399898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795462720","doi":"10.11575/prism/34056","title":"Help Wanted: Judges","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.018000880581954745,"score_gpt":0.2646057022138197,"score_spread":0.24660482163186492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795462720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00881852,0.0025091767,0.00284982,0.10701883,0.0159484,0.00058509514,0.0007922039,0.0010921544,0.86038584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043643024,0.0008615678,0.0015335922,0.050062012,0.001646787,0.00022812372,0.00038766317,0.00046295638,0.9011743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905131,0.0015995859,0.00032863545,0.0012135716,0.0029750508,0.0033700266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98485893,0.0015850553,0.00035156918,0.00069134816,0.0048452714,0.0076677147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004470733,0.0007849296,0.00067926553,0.0015484912,0.018655088,0.011874138,0.002297055,0.0072833835,0.18793094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02458047,0.00088094274,0.00073589187,0.0014966413,0.0034999843,0.0043557948,0.008961237,0.008687965,0.06211659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015612291,0.00002939967,0.0009172581,0.000046333895,0.0000026354535,0.00062904693,0.0036764422,0.000021637785,0.00026821977,0.019971559,0.957203,0.017218824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007862601,0.0000093517565,0.00054054277,0.000050746596,0.00000260906,0.0001519573,0.0031586362,0.000028436469,0.00007300551,0.0017162679,0.9942509,0.000009648503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04367703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15829031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18793094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008971877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018396905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6286917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795580582","doi":"","title":"CANADIAN BAR REVIEW EDITION ON LEGAL EDUCATION: INTRODUCTION FROM THE CBA LEGAL FUTURES INITIATIVE AND THE CBA EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Bar (unit); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Public administration; Engineering; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.06882788545955318,"score_gpt":0.38340027560023554,"score_spread":0.3145723901406824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795580582","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031266254,0.42454928,0.00074425165,0.38947472,0.083711006,0.00038395045,0.0052268626,0.00020225995,0.09539506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010095862,0.4787563,0.0049927454,0.32577318,0.049176093,0.0010424443,0.0055088745,0.00051004055,0.1241445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94350517,0.0028939808,0.0027380264,0.0018897805,0.045255158,0.0037178376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8668747,0.020758266,0.005027385,0.0019538961,0.10031429,0.005071478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028714895,0.0027344169,0.0027805376,0.034256443,0.00921953,0.019326596,0.0079223765,0.021016473,0.017373702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07891344,0.0019962625,0.0021447334,0.043060627,0.00902482,0.0075004227,0.0047007254,0.015626455,0.00493237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049764367,0.0000074155614,0.000044693075,0.0006023795,0.0000047122608,0.000012829571,0.00009044934,0.000037561196,0.00002355299,0.0059961407,0.98409086,0.009084432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008771268,0.0000051065444,0.0011963884,0.0023709552,0.000016424403,0.000016864338,0.00013065392,0.000024102397,0.00002445871,0.0012796989,0.99489045,0.000035965077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9095387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9626244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.885304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.114696056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25753906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83218205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796095825","doi":"","title":"Integrated Reflective Practice: A Critical Imperative for Enhancing Legal Education and Professionalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective practice; Legal education; Operationalization; Engineering ethics; Legal profession; Legal practice; Pedagogy; Curriculum; Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04044907062633881,"score_gpt":0.4956787552775857,"score_spread":0.4552296846512469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796095825","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011763662,0.016266203,0.22369508,0.6443863,0.0049585137,0.0009994393,0.000042253265,0.00062539015,0.09726309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49696842,0.017322438,0.38137048,0.07475781,0.005467929,0.002996031,0.00010642095,0.0005395417,0.02047104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.76797163,0.16813532,0.008125207,0.011671746,0.038563665,0.005532383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59107757,0.2748914,0.01934489,0.04590294,0.03948688,0.02929626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18810777,0.0012757576,0.0021771963,0.0038563926,0.011453211,0.0303721,0.005422493,0.014043522,0.0040649953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21546236,0.0015609197,0.0015078261,0.0017220974,0.086013824,0.030434418,0.022735003,0.02697527,0.0025128652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004216353,0.0004380619,0.0016893351,0.0015285519,0.00011303903,0.0003839231,0.121007755,0.00075508916,0.0010118496,0.70778114,0.035274766,0.12997434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076273245,0.00015025074,0.001000998,0.003798606,0.00004213201,0.00079238333,0.030886883,0.00072720874,0.0009321744,0.6642225,0.2972446,0.00012594824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022387006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023917344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18810777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011765583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060401898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800139708","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.1.2","title":"Teaching and Researching Ethically: Guidance for Instructor-Researchers, Educational Developers, and Research Ethics Personnel","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Scholarship; Bioethics; Library science; Political science; Higher education; Pedagogy; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.367231151476828,"score_gpt":0.5345231301389526,"score_spread":0.16729197866212459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800139708","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036419197,0.00759735,0.056998942,0.9034412,0.0126137035,0.0019019439,0.00012190621,0.00077552814,0.012907478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09372139,0.02077064,0.40119672,0.40923944,0.013653776,0.011976616,0.0005198265,0.0012061112,0.04771556],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.57273835,0.33572063,0.025270661,0.008901073,0.046037648,0.01133154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27340984,0.44327116,0.026196573,0.037743352,0.14201221,0.07736685],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33879343,0.0019963288,0.0041919462,0.0042290967,0.017387163,0.03402728,0.007994485,0.033064447,0.004757832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4574167,0.0028194902,0.0023684292,0.0031215067,0.047421295,0.02564645,0.01933713,0.06601474,0.01166324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007645757,0.0003967107,0.001346729,0.0009634519,0.000044534067,0.0015582312,0.23359796,0.00047078947,0.0016664645,0.05757878,0.62175107,0.0805488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007298258,0.000103809034,0.00045588284,0.0030186793,0.000019515408,0.0012273279,0.0752332,0.0005602283,0.0006490992,0.07619794,0.8422843,0.00017701456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008286902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018078754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6612066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016266355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1796057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81538546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801408833","doi":"10.4337/9781786430793.00010","title":"‘Fighting words’: regulating judges in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Pyramid (geometry); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03634989993479968,"score_gpt":0.2859380492508062,"score_spread":0.2495881493160065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801408833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025892213,0.010289469,0.0042275465,0.055504967,0.0012587188,0.000075498894,0.00009624388,0.00011102562,0.9025443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6557486,0.0081364,0.002978186,0.018159451,0.00029999012,0.00006449974,0.00009966126,0.000107773485,0.3144054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955509,0.00064429326,0.00006742949,0.00035621485,0.0020691927,0.0013120363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862516,0.00037558077,0.00006477523,0.00004569144,0.0006726177,0.00021621933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016752899,0.00038338735,0.0002811484,0.0011570223,0.0174888,0.008659359,0.0019356884,0.003488737,0.0051234467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038221152,0.00027620583,0.00026011997,0.0023832028,0.013842218,0.0019958797,0.001849717,0.005000884,0.00062298676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009244033,0.000010797747,0.00061500835,0.00005090045,0.0000036744734,0.00016751612,0.026537903,0.0004893902,0.00023028131,0.85542893,0.08587929,0.030576983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008011063,0.000013006265,0.0021196883,0.00020125997,0.000011509184,0.00009987006,0.016157357,0.00079424924,0.00039959344,0.040467493,0.939688,0.000040000654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9552017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9793305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086511955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086511955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.133207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6276911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801426332","doi":"","title":"Court of Appeal for Ontario","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Alphascript Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0657621426225248,"score_gpt":0.3413164617336619,"score_spread":0.27555431911113715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801426332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057973377,0.0019022088,0.0002857249,0.07735916,0.0034425056,0.00056755403,0.0028021652,0.00020817261,0.90763503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008349815,0.0004575781,0.00011251494,0.03417098,0.00046134202,0.00024308488,0.00023514936,0.00007058459,0.9558989],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954668,0.00018482977,0.000118606775,0.00056107686,0.0017079725,0.0019606743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971814,0.00080077787,0.0000731853,0.00016387047,0.001269028,0.00051174546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001792329,0.001320489,0.0018853229,0.0020750673,0.026994856,0.009035142,0.0032830252,0.037047908,0.12550816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008438515,0.002071634,0.0022824795,0.0022309474,0.0027320152,0.0023239607,0.0027326334,0.016894104,0.024520993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010566445,0.000055216282,0.00092352787,0.00008365285,0.000034171364,0.00085872447,0.0007967202,0.000120133365,0.00023040181,0.056043044,0.933468,0.007280793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009384842,0.000018276367,0.0028843968,0.00018332638,0.000054057284,0.00010831379,0.0007960548,0.00022026604,0.00015668792,0.005457567,0.9899721,0.000055195742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8776996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96466273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12550816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04299671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08939333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41986662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802853531","doi":"10.29173/alr1407","title":"The Law Review Mission: A Student Editor's Point of View","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.08699920699082081,"score_gpt":0.47921682643932656,"score_spread":0.39221761944850575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802853531","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032500282,0.039869767,0.0007322854,0.747012,0.20813392,0.000037672107,0.000024947614,0.00007453382,0.0037898426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011565674,0.042052727,0.0017803265,0.45682627,0.46795404,0.00015781754,0.00003669994,0.000093069786,0.019533286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94971526,0.018194802,0.005433327,0.002992872,0.021581788,0.0020819092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7168271,0.0837925,0.016849898,0.009443946,0.13115011,0.041936446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07208638,0.0017210991,0.004679101,0.0036671776,0.005578333,0.028890084,0.0049347295,0.03196323,0.004391692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20575358,0.0011423548,0.0013408893,0.004083037,0.01055478,0.013954392,0.0047545475,0.020393783,0.0056987945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000390893,0.000042822427,0.0002961422,0.0007705527,0.000025571511,0.00021125833,0.000388412,0.000083824576,0.00012278669,0.009497781,0.9569719,0.031549856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004773388,0.000067138295,0.00050105207,0.0009965622,0.00003562523,0.00032277225,0.0005720167,0.0002129725,0.000090990616,0.008004139,0.98911357,0.000035503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028739064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007176131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07208638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007742697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03629622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38123375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802970483","doi":"10.29173/alr1408","title":"Role of the Law Review: A Select Biography","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.025033120170301446,"score_gpt":0.3564745734724988,"score_spread":0.3314414533021973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802970483","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021867678,0.24569286,0.0011628836,0.5929593,0.025083737,0.00006144298,0.00004776157,0.000035481913,0.13276969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.097715005,0.14780015,0.0010099001,0.26704925,0.04088481,0.00012603187,0.000052232856,0.0000936075,0.44526902],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957172,0.0017647637,0.00013342554,0.0004932785,0.001280446,0.0006109228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99249,0.0032652975,0.0003021116,0.00020975812,0.0019933968,0.0017395474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006926574,0.00046094606,0.0006349249,0.0032483912,0.0081427,0.01572216,0.0013301002,0.011524906,0.0059222793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008479585,0.0005376296,0.00026015766,0.0033209675,0.010548761,0.0054546087,0.0022215226,0.008270194,0.0016011068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020501744,0.000054422766,0.00045933557,0.00024802441,0.000012825552,0.0002170772,0.0028003969,0.0001665157,0.0002021914,0.2682941,0.6866744,0.04085028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052449413,0.000009945938,0.00054206204,0.00020308695,0.0000051518214,0.00006957095,0.0005594967,0.00007090855,0.000032617292,0.009824677,0.988667,0.000010256139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14837389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27211583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9757769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024223067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030963166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29502052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803402636","doi":"10.1017/cls.2018.3","title":"Harry Glasbeek Class Privilege: How Law Shelters Shareholders and Coddles Capitalism. Toronto: Between the Lines, 2017, 382 p.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Privilege (computing); Class (philosophy); Shareholder; Sociology; Political science; Economic history; Law; Economics; Management; Philosophy; Epistemology; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.03713672220333496,"score_gpt":0.3122804749471741,"score_spread":0.2751437527438391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803402636","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013810569,0.1846344,0.0010304597,0.5880733,0.0019601253,0.000020869105,0.000528336,0.00008220921,0.20985967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56361336,0.14775313,0.0011902456,0.034939323,0.0018120058,0.00006645061,0.00026795996,0.0002355692,0.250122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993511,0.0002589179,0.0000196124,0.000049102287,0.00014605567,0.00017518492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824154,0.000919809,0.00013046902,0.00006786296,0.00023761479,0.00040271773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011969273,0.00047422145,0.00026938846,0.0010360754,0.009219766,0.0076049264,0.0012947731,0.0056160726,0.014536747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041414835,0.00045311876,0.00022562296,0.0018925006,0.01525347,0.0077203237,0.0024527828,0.003691692,0.0014711281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002158847,0.00000788657,0.0012331948,0.00013307242,0.000007102453,0.00041322102,0.049608093,0.00011236728,0.00012237947,0.35464993,0.56285465,0.030836554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000121860385,0.0000064341702,0.009767276,0.00085216074,0.000014378916,0.00016610377,0.06818062,0.00014160671,0.00020774461,0.07497218,0.8456466,0.000032689626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70992553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8988957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70992553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033019383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02133958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58356553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804314192","doi":"","title":"Chinese and American Forum on Legal Information and Law Libraries: Highlights from Hangzhou","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; China; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01276419225647997,"score_gpt":0.3280597777615261,"score_spread":0.31529558550504616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804314192","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05184492,0.18965113,0.0010577028,0.54561096,0.081565015,0.00034703518,0.002576691,0.00026365893,0.1270829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3082513,0.15930782,0.0018001883,0.13642138,0.093696356,0.0005826767,0.0041660676,0.00043262407,0.2953416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982132,0.000321664,0.00009499306,0.00013917488,0.0006517021,0.00057925034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953082,0.00090600626,0.0003017129,0.00011147315,0.00080024113,0.0025722191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004415078,0.0010580443,0.00055561867,0.004200179,0.007751113,0.008715807,0.00084238866,0.0036222793,0.015006767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00255577,0.00043054624,0.00056536164,0.009352205,0.0021264611,0.003450289,0.0061346833,0.0027873842,0.0019152025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012932537,0.00007534566,0.0040039923,0.0013809631,0.000022259375,0.0007354654,0.011756868,0.0001088985,0.0013873469,0.0112927575,0.88946027,0.0796466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018539442,0.000028032006,0.015034813,0.00036836838,0.000017320424,0.00012719906,0.006988034,0.000058825644,0.00026792992,0.0007443357,0.97631615,0.00003038322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02670039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07530263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02670039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005664714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0111611625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053089917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804397918","doi":"10.29173/alr1285","title":"The Civil Justice System and the Public: Highlights of the Alberta Pilot","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; General partnership; Public administration; Public relations; Alliance; Political science; State (computer science); Civil society; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03731775034346534,"score_gpt":0.3339262583776665,"score_spread":0.29660850803420113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804397918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71902514,0.0036223615,0.0013218885,0.11303936,0.0009950063,0.0012815562,0.0002659719,0.00012660942,0.16032213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580303,0.0014808128,0.0011588549,0.011444647,0.00013665383,0.00027666372,0.00008990303,0.000034100765,0.027348049],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822729,0.005570107,0.00020817512,0.00047945802,0.0056471284,0.005822188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820424,0.008698421,0.00042564704,0.00076281826,0.003965399,0.004105418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013114735,0.00037639218,0.0005641701,0.0019075949,0.0284344,0.008959552,0.0041527697,0.005365805,0.0038765857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018548569,0.000646519,0.00044660817,0.004324534,0.015721835,0.0032320465,0.00803768,0.0057863086,0.00029254024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011053227,0.0032935976,0.04766267,0.0009541308,0.00007479505,0.017413879,0.45409822,0.0016236613,0.003926558,0.184978,0.08799795,0.1968712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002576253,0.00076414814,0.08812397,0.00033748304,0.00006436064,0.0006839796,0.7210018,0.00084079354,0.0013277872,0.00963373,0.17681937,0.00014493788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94413507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98025995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08054434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08054434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19781649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5843928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807785635","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Starting Canadian Legal Research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.34484424560324445,"score_gpt":0.5101292064878254,"score_spread":0.165284960884581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807785635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007964505,0.006266164,0.0037384157,0.030153671,0.0032258986,0.0012585205,0.05807198,0.0036890456,0.89279985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026384506,0.006253765,0.011951163,0.0046374267,0.00021295634,0.00062397827,0.015546476,0.0012914342,0.9568444],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98665434,0.00095377327,0.00073508325,0.0004330581,0.009457898,0.0017658097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94022936,0.0049710944,0.0006482346,0.0013299648,0.048436563,0.0043848404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010531675,0.0016540193,0.0013838678,0.014880003,0.014607403,0.01574831,0.0042288536,0.0068363794,0.27432314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041862898,0.0020248755,0.0015559375,0.024228672,0.0035638227,0.007860744,0.003724965,0.005620865,0.12167382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004415793,0.000008799164,0.00007376463,0.00008521536,9.2906276e-7,0.000009458419,0.000109656765,0.000035106645,0.000013819392,0.0036390815,0.9813601,0.014659661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006065818,0.0000027244894,0.0009111735,0.00027580146,0.000005558181,0.000013303115,0.00039198974,0.000054689703,0.00006893143,0.0011005477,0.99714226,0.00002688254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.971975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27432314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.081094764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36253566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9177023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809849274","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2273903826120791,"score_gpt":0.44916225349173455,"score_spread":0.22177187087965544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809849274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011730343,0.0043371837,0.0027990362,0.008250923,0.0010178128,0.00120728,0.12356886,0.0026161617,0.8550296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002306862,0.0047647147,0.005499593,0.0007903671,0.00006885199,0.0005331306,0.022222219,0.0009140969,0.96290016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932482,0.00039841508,0.0005306259,0.0003351167,0.0046917424,0.0007959017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96412206,0.0024186957,0.00062959595,0.001067411,0.03024673,0.001515486],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005085055,0.0017866887,0.0016309471,0.013842308,0.013120043,0.010682872,0.0032563475,0.0029565096,0.38160577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022249803,0.002566127,0.0014662972,0.02998049,0.0023816957,0.005941255,0.002865564,0.002763163,0.15022357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009505097,0.000011900616,0.00023468862,0.00016825645,0.0000021583858,0.000013598696,0.0001856908,0.00007492369,0.000023602826,0.003038997,0.97258353,0.023653163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008213557,0.000003823058,0.0016896044,0.00023699207,0.000007846239,0.0000149034395,0.00039434189,0.00009155367,0.00007359274,0.00061959395,0.9968368,0.000022887918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98290503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38160577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082102135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27788764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8820643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W281354433","doi":"10.55016/ojs/ajer.v49i2.54975","title":"Discourses of Conflict: A Multidisciplinary Study of Professional Education","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Educational research; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Social science","score_opus":0.17356747730327024,"score_gpt":0.5666311744045761,"score_spread":0.39306369710130584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W281354433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92372894,0.0014995506,0.0010523534,0.025581144,0.00018961403,0.00007833411,0.000037413673,0.000014949728,0.04781783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99634224,0.0003415472,0.0002153191,0.0011377732,0.00004032471,0.000052477408,0.000015128605,0.000020200916,0.0018349127],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93615985,0.050678615,0.0013843364,0.0020348686,0.004391276,0.005350998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7720841,0.1924198,0.013264375,0.0032350007,0.007837745,0.0111590335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04037763,0.0007473429,0.0012582954,0.008381032,0.06335678,0.031161252,0.0052521904,0.010569706,0.00546552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12341311,0.0012063144,0.00042450405,0.0077818357,0.04369083,0.020936381,0.025326604,0.01750599,0.00041707276],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001178857,0.00002644964,0.0010357295,0.000013495697,0.0000017508731,0.00008764621,0.99204576,0.0000068578943,0.000025461271,0.005642232,0.00023665017,0.0008661866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052403443,0.0000073931014,0.0009771914,0.000054976954,0.0000021182682,0.000047522495,0.9932643,0.000030396852,0.000027251252,0.0012933695,0.0042847283,0.0000054813377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0414257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043042567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06335678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022062888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020716324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2135399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2852858962","doi":"","title":"Volunteer Lawyers and Nation-Building: Using Experience to Serve the World Community","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics","score_opus":0.20485384766202344,"score_gpt":0.4550879058964419,"score_spread":0.25023405823441847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2852858962","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30629796,0.025114566,0.007644393,0.47908413,0.009871044,0.00059288694,0.00008284519,0.0003652841,0.1709469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8207106,0.014024045,0.008104534,0.06437733,0.0023764537,0.0006322939,0.00012480897,0.00028683935,0.08936313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857907,0.01094726,0.0001466931,0.00035677527,0.00064199703,0.0021166315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799947,0.006885795,0.00080784346,0.0008258408,0.0011275538,0.010358241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016579442,0.00040091656,0.00050785317,0.001195458,0.017436683,0.014178703,0.0021820716,0.0046530515,0.010043224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01600678,0.00039192164,0.0003421228,0.0011672465,0.009951474,0.009017177,0.01571603,0.0054578483,0.0015068967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006250747,0.0007842115,0.004490735,0.000314228,0.000014536242,0.001865624,0.6048186,0.00009155446,0.00070231763,0.05686188,0.20986173,0.12013218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030819923,0.00016196142,0.0008568985,0.00022678432,0.000005619988,0.000509106,0.2769464,0.000073535855,0.00016544857,0.0059309597,0.71507204,0.000020518006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002574152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015748814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017436683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026056687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010448897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08768147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287888172","doi":"","title":"Safe and Inclusive Schools – Expensive...Quality Education – Priceless, for Everything Else There's Lawyers!","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Legal education; Quality (philosophy); Sociology","score_opus":0.03414989431579128,"score_gpt":0.3956349827684218,"score_spread":0.3614850884526305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W287888172","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014657536,0.016284015,0.02579249,0.5605789,0.005626245,0.00006807928,0.00010279076,0.0004234335,0.37646657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5581565,0.021559663,0.023990354,0.15578021,0.0036632046,0.00016550328,0.0001619419,0.0003898557,0.2361327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989796,0.0026077759,0.0002568868,0.00064570346,0.005562096,0.0011316534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989567,0.0036880104,0.0014162229,0.0011577557,0.0018301673,0.00234092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046397867,0.00046886635,0.0005849584,0.0013036081,0.007678425,0.013878121,0.0011323926,0.0048178392,0.01729999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014623637,0.0003592832,0.00034925976,0.0013022096,0.01829106,0.018334825,0.009606245,0.008190807,0.004009366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002287657,0.00007997678,0.0011535315,0.00018293709,0.000013461645,0.00011111219,0.0058414526,0.00020234812,0.00028406794,0.8156929,0.094199955,0.08221535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010641206,0.000046148194,0.0020826089,0.00045717947,0.000011966123,0.00018053193,0.00813255,0.000104217565,0.00036022655,0.25427374,0.734312,0.000028296854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009760164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033201657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01729999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006164597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011179871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057874203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883538131","doi":"","title":"Making the world a better place","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BCLA Browser: Linking the Library Landscape","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.057831984407803315,"score_gpt":0.34756163060747575,"score_spread":0.28972964619967245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883538131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050158016,0.020307953,0.0040805214,0.33030137,0.012053013,0.00003771996,0.00008437585,0.0003459816,0.62777317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20141868,0.026748836,0.0073061828,0.08664191,0.0035097045,0.000092537026,0.00022177889,0.0007529742,0.67330736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738425,0.0011323188,0.000053043157,0.00027637847,0.0006007835,0.0005532097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976693,0.0003577799,0.00010806629,0.000289909,0.00042349997,0.0011513623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026534975,0.0007429991,0.00037951372,0.0009692292,0.015285183,0.018859854,0.0007845152,0.0036784094,0.03857409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049695303,0.0003843232,0.0003891562,0.0009799845,0.015176793,0.02162264,0.010479549,0.0068213246,0.012833368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001920771,0.00002941579,0.00033425586,0.00009689375,0.000010232364,0.00014658424,0.013869531,0.00008080086,0.00037098458,0.25951502,0.664579,0.060948167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020003624,0.000006035383,0.00012910829,0.00008758452,0.0000024370158,0.000048791568,0.0074274093,0.000017878925,0.00011067414,0.01833762,0.97382396,0.0000065617764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01087238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026938554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03857409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003891058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006654927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12904322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883695252","doi":"10.53300/001c.6314","title":"Exploring Changes in the Emotional Intelligence of Law Students","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Legal education; Law; Publishing; Project commissioning; Psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Political science; Library science","score_opus":0.32325907880305554,"score_gpt":0.5100017198188589,"score_spread":0.18674264101580335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883695252","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005261655,0.5829787,0.00024257324,0.37479076,0.025740406,0.00006484558,0.0006665541,0.000020675334,0.010233838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061017152,0.6585074,0.00087740616,0.23559473,0.030121598,0.00044038083,0.0010384369,0.000079684934,0.012323197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549365,0.002296843,0.00038280446,0.0003073444,0.0011757998,0.0003435289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95740134,0.02542076,0.0032564446,0.0006098251,0.011780094,0.0015316299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0100582875,0.00029019514,0.0005813828,0.0024554853,0.0008126709,0.0036109039,0.0009144717,0.0024971613,0.005841442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05014533,0.00023108591,0.0006584417,0.0023124593,0.0014955527,0.0039479746,0.001724336,0.005155068,0.0013269186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001242845,0.00009155228,0.0057789763,0.0047327057,0.00032119045,0.00008024587,0.0025672151,0.000050220126,0.00020077957,0.007482717,0.6304485,0.34812158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057778547,0.0002518763,0.068746135,0.01554779,0.00037245467,0.0001579464,0.0069585517,0.000050796363,0.00030328427,0.0051577874,0.90233475,0.000060927046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008337805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019908119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0100582875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002238823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00483817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053193927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884686682","doi":"10.5334/kula.40","title":"The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse: Origins and Goals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Civil rights; USable; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06468279802853663,"score_gpt":0.4654572817283917,"score_spread":0.400774483699855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884686682","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030711105,0.01644878,0.035641044,0.487371,0.0015934751,0.001035639,0.0009462214,0.0010287385,0.42522395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63586307,0.016598213,0.10153113,0.051833987,0.0035958497,0.0015159145,0.0018402919,0.0016703326,0.18555124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98783475,0.004740136,0.0006701144,0.0016112006,0.0035577954,0.0015859385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93665886,0.024748174,0.0041912384,0.005695693,0.013034936,0.015671145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030819897,0.0005937659,0.00056797167,0.004923118,0.012739609,0.041969664,0.0031182426,0.012916417,0.01638073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034906436,0.0010635504,0.00044832457,0.006753745,0.030277837,0.042418245,0.015372759,0.013693708,0.0067953593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023180426,0.00020737454,0.0014227419,0.00014507386,0.0000025136126,0.00016994611,0.004983399,0.00012192665,0.00018915354,0.91418546,0.03366776,0.04488152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033261957,0.00006675916,0.0026421116,0.0010091009,0.000005055224,0.0003999793,0.010122373,0.0007567319,0.001125414,0.2007382,0.7830257,0.000075311735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013487442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007887852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041969664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01457918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037267238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16299313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885008690","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2018.1464759","title":"An examination of the effectiveness of Readers’ Theatre as a teaching strategy in legal education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; History; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03565681160170658,"score_gpt":0.39504151197051723,"score_spread":0.35938470036881065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885008690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94978386,0.0003164059,0.006731655,0.0007932142,0.000072218936,0.00021979088,0.000019784764,0.00006967971,0.041993298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916483,0.00029324848,0.004433906,0.00013760872,0.000024802055,0.0001343495,0.00001396941,0.00002067745,0.0032930654],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867879,0.010264101,0.00037847753,0.00055444887,0.0015144806,0.00050066906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93736887,0.054379266,0.0026659193,0.0022627066,0.0020443802,0.0012787988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011331086,0.0003336803,0.00031114044,0.0013936968,0.0011350559,0.0029109214,0.0010559885,0.0010059903,0.0050236853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050542526,0.0002262697,0.00029879878,0.0005880256,0.0029782194,0.0030690548,0.0023072283,0.0011646504,0.0008033939],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019962345,0.01025301,0.03222256,0.002094681,0.00008238681,0.00067147095,0.19492026,0.0014297689,0.025839895,0.019999212,0.002568827,0.70792174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015481829,0.06241316,0.299889,0.0027605202,0.00084587274,0.0054381043,0.3810018,0.013295961,0.09960262,0.015732279,0.117036745,0.00043573615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078585045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009937632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011331086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001019346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011322141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0599252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885288477","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Nunavut","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.20029932104661277,"score_gpt":0.46048000523377286,"score_spread":0.2601806841871601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885288477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00092875236,0.005077623,0.0032237712,0.0066142376,0.0012815085,0.00092498824,0.07614583,0.0034864822,0.90231675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019292285,0.0039473893,0.0055561275,0.00071940414,0.00006612956,0.0004289894,0.015902914,0.0012065466,0.9702433],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433774,0.00044053013,0.00038600198,0.00034607563,0.0038678597,0.0006217657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969112,0.0029257317,0.0004290983,0.0009543214,0.025329953,0.0012490437],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054958384,0.0018151082,0.001652568,0.0156714,0.013132922,0.012240595,0.0036728405,0.0027503949,0.36511958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022224361,0.002270149,0.0010740571,0.027858187,0.002557262,0.0069445185,0.002896449,0.003055441,0.17288983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008058219,0.0000104514875,0.00012179244,0.00011630763,0.0000011372339,0.000011111659,0.00018835395,0.00006458362,0.00002122827,0.0031871255,0.96673614,0.02953381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046393016,0.0000024816743,0.0009902262,0.0002492823,0.0000047993817,0.000016397775,0.0004926546,0.00007753709,0.000085500025,0.00067780993,0.9973781,0.000020602165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95291173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9836881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36511958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0484027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1698502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90557986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885527349","doi":"","title":"Research guides: Primary sources: Canadian: Government & legal information","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science","score_opus":0.1023408231059054,"score_gpt":0.4308747698664036,"score_spread":0.3285339467604982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885527349","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008213325,0.001463937,0.0015377795,0.005778537,0.00052639976,0.0026641109,0.4938379,0.0018154142,0.49155465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0086747585,0.00582406,0.012946176,0.0025756233,0.00021114218,0.007275672,0.22385478,0.0026997903,0.73593795],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99281174,0.0007387574,0.0010523171,0.00056774967,0.0040382957,0.000791132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8815782,0.018503083,0.002080561,0.0041649058,0.08908658,0.004586756],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007826609,0.001333892,0.0017287453,0.02406681,0.0067183487,0.007416239,0.003118189,0.00283007,0.4980779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061308432,0.0017213221,0.00084833417,0.041297182,0.0016817781,0.0044710217,0.0031111757,0.0026596386,0.20378539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017518641,0.000017280807,0.00023784883,0.00081512536,0.0000031942388,0.000020843916,0.00035497398,0.000029758578,0.000045832723,0.0019485411,0.97602373,0.02048531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021170401,0.0000062219087,0.0031254468,0.0010737922,0.0000090715685,0.00001597852,0.0008127012,0.00005591628,0.00017901932,0.0008684066,0.9938095,0.000022837306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.846724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92583066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4980779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033391647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21511528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71593094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885571311","doi":"10.35502/jcswb.73","title":"Justice: Let’s look beyond the system as we know it","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Need to know; Internet privacy; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Computer security; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037381903377900066,"score_gpt":0.3715233516178193,"score_spread":0.3341414482399192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885571311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044756085,0.0067472025,0.0073344647,0.89642155,0.005438357,0.000037887756,0.00005800651,0.000105906474,0.07938104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51121664,0.0100991875,0.008526515,0.38954058,0.007866868,0.00019334683,0.0001335964,0.00052082003,0.071902364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98292875,0.0087316865,0.0004148411,0.00144364,0.003318414,0.0031627303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9723168,0.008437441,0.0014127297,0.0026642212,0.007939397,0.0072293314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014829852,0.00080939906,0.0014081971,0.0019987624,0.019396417,0.029658854,0.0031762468,0.015549501,0.026648834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033860307,0.0005271336,0.0010690128,0.0013597342,0.05966555,0.044661008,0.013627681,0.033243507,0.004618514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024297222,0.00014073604,0.0026802423,0.0002218064,0.00006215944,0.0002797627,0.023321202,0.00023828851,0.00024626325,0.8251801,0.11678926,0.030815823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014428387,0.000053873646,0.0011290894,0.0007314392,0.000033123837,0.00021798236,0.02386219,0.0002632227,0.00025660708,0.6316563,0.3417102,0.00007154203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023324331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033556234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029658854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028447423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0891493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W288690391","doi":"","title":"America’s Culture of Litigation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.034789075570135684,"score_gpt":0.32267505630838256,"score_spread":0.2878859807382469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W288690391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0966212,0.0036130757,0.0014918528,0.36120087,0.0017214079,0.000016552736,0.000089851565,0.00005380495,0.5351914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9014447,0.0012662983,0.00059759273,0.060861845,0.00053677685,0.000035562407,0.00003192606,0.00007041323,0.03515493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399734,0.0029200886,0.00012860801,0.0007014096,0.0010152187,0.0012373899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99363035,0.0025310894,0.00055880693,0.0004657735,0.0013548423,0.0014590917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004026272,0.00034695925,0.00037824447,0.0015762503,0.02055153,0.018092232,0.00091849366,0.007835286,0.0059754737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008603143,0.00027776018,0.00022238305,0.0020731792,0.023937188,0.007852842,0.0052344105,0.017371025,0.0004911464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016087632,0.000051924777,0.0012035667,0.000020071451,0.000009628321,0.00015533515,0.06454835,0.00007894684,0.00022258182,0.8673701,0.05646235,0.009861047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015376121,0.000022770315,0.0031289202,0.00013846508,0.000012440222,0.00014617758,0.05493416,0.00015396332,0.00017549023,0.11237742,0.8288419,0.000052931966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07677065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09292066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07677065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011496037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01226726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15264761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887519783","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Northwest Territories","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.14465612454073168,"score_gpt":0.4354920114704034,"score_spread":0.2908358869296717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887519783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000619874,0.003402999,0.0021571263,0.0038829404,0.0008140681,0.00071702444,0.072771974,0.0019341141,0.91369987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001218083,0.003714816,0.004247519,0.0005271619,0.000046964396,0.00035916455,0.018461611,0.0008216483,0.9706031],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943037,0.000404254,0.00041542586,0.00031302203,0.0039054228,0.000658177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714334,0.0025900528,0.0003891351,0.0010069957,0.023451932,0.0011285241],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056134183,0.0018422261,0.0018467227,0.014055313,0.010896689,0.012299698,0.0035934849,0.0031146263,0.3773411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019106554,0.0025052035,0.001269954,0.028013173,0.0020668074,0.006098703,0.002734352,0.0034767124,0.19644569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008233026,0.000013050931,0.00014895089,0.000121582925,0.000001540023,0.000013317973,0.00012814434,0.00009173807,0.000019651947,0.0033405635,0.96519,0.030923117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005105023,0.0000024917438,0.0011456546,0.00026569818,0.0000047528983,0.000014196721,0.0003180652,0.000088394554,0.00007414329,0.00065187167,0.99741036,0.000019345049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95528543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9855245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3773411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045548182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17540084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88814735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887842190","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Manitoba","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2301080299650064,"score_gpt":0.45421657990515185,"score_spread":0.22410854994014545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887842190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009943807,0.004246682,0.0031115927,0.005467057,0.00088765426,0.0010984223,0.10726982,0.0034562391,0.87346804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017080255,0.0038329111,0.0067208996,0.0005967297,0.000041897198,0.0005130386,0.023221316,0.0011578551,0.9622073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545234,0.0003236971,0.0003148137,0.00027279486,0.0031506587,0.00048571473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710749,0.0022277748,0.00043191196,0.0009168938,0.024249876,0.001098704],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004339952,0.001968986,0.0015218578,0.015111356,0.009971817,0.01005328,0.003971896,0.0023374087,0.4221711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017485784,0.0025215405,0.001040879,0.031806037,0.0020075878,0.0052163783,0.0026023337,0.0028915133,0.20042521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011063107,0.000017450613,0.00021500015,0.0001576256,0.0000019538122,0.00001534142,0.00017480973,0.00008640976,0.00003834366,0.0030442846,0.9606449,0.035593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073370884,0.0000036780568,0.0014686413,0.00026815044,0.0000061358296,0.000018292418,0.0004052103,0.000101838814,0.00011102031,0.00059941877,0.99699044,0.000019956886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9569065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9872283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4221711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046396766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18545675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8242028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888190429","doi":"10.4324/9780367199432-2","title":"Theory and Practice, Together at Last","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04649023479511862,"score_gpt":0.37631588787596226,"score_spread":0.32982565308084366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888190429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016097678,0.036638003,0.07827791,0.2163007,0.0034197303,0.0006796184,0.00024247241,0.000335514,0.6480084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77496195,0.030150004,0.085888386,0.02948321,0.0019747962,0.0017665252,0.00047888682,0.00035328584,0.07494305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9565966,0.02595886,0.0021014337,0.0038387524,0.008945366,0.0025589073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96733576,0.020106988,0.0014561956,0.004836286,0.004361595,0.0019032441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026972122,0.001194813,0.0021789,0.005271068,0.010926495,0.02764943,0.0038343954,0.006894602,0.012421089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035748973,0.00083106244,0.0013121283,0.0061162934,0.070949115,0.02118316,0.01286227,0.009197734,0.003379571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013862079,0.00005395552,0.00086067134,0.00049112795,0.000024331814,0.00017789697,0.036367882,0.00027137072,0.00019096593,0.9255866,0.008085162,0.027876161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018495151,0.00004796874,0.0009312802,0.0020765834,0.00002167844,0.0002587341,0.0406278,0.00040851274,0.00020049137,0.60065395,0.35472223,0.000032302352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025228554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019536879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02764943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017667754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03943497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14264399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888740438","doi":"10.23977/aetp.2018.21014","title":"Improvement of Methods in the Process of Criminal Law Teaching Based on Amendment of Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; China; Process (computing); Teaching method; Curriculum; Criminal investigation; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.039366973540276275,"score_gpt":0.5029618361902147,"score_spread":0.46359486264993843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888740438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91881716,0.0015811329,0.033887684,0.0038082218,0.00023168394,0.0019317248,0.00010581481,0.00035437406,0.039282132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92962843,0.0013285708,0.05147622,0.00024484363,0.000057685553,0.000557803,0.0001553392,0.000039127295,0.016511954],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974734,0.000957509,0.00025112275,0.00029179628,0.00079190155,0.00023417217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981184,0.000556142,0.00024857177,0.0001675747,0.00053882657,0.00037048815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038916217,0.00037882169,0.00023996126,0.0013337104,0.001904944,0.0011023412,0.00088056724,0.0005037443,0.002656759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004811111,0.0002587245,0.00029162352,0.0010900026,0.00071076525,0.00096916594,0.0012189205,0.0005927481,0.00020210746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017883719,0.0017546341,0.06685913,0.0017155383,0.000029764895,0.00044838758,0.027604794,0.004107573,0.014555747,0.013733727,0.008347604,0.86066425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004124275,0.0019580824,0.61816365,0.0016501254,0.00023687207,0.0011306852,0.024057291,0.03953377,0.03713163,0.0153240925,0.26013178,0.00026963605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019836038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027131865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019836038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003914381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015158686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03944117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889005851","doi":"","title":"Book review of Canadian Handbook of Higher Education Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.042146405207616006,"score_gpt":0.4120350097898767,"score_spread":0.3698886045822607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889005851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040041946,0.32604086,0.0014236871,0.08485665,0.030510921,0.0001476649,0.0020555716,0.00038275143,0.55418146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007460554,0.21329111,0.0022388867,0.02175843,0.0068450198,0.000114200026,0.0016889352,0.0002475487,0.7463554],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972339,0.00014280464,0.00007719405,0.00012830037,0.0021956011,0.00022225642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994616,0.0006693771,0.00010056857,0.00011807682,0.00416863,0.00032747455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015492773,0.0009696711,0.00083041727,0.011064154,0.0044441284,0.005143167,0.0024522182,0.0028103497,0.06586401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064301644,0.0005176525,0.0005253977,0.017894704,0.0028742577,0.0025717325,0.0010611442,0.0031008213,0.014196857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015822176,0.0000029391113,0.000018241259,0.000086590786,8.4526283e-7,0.000010329503,0.000042933585,0.0000459739,0.000013568556,0.006538155,0.97360283,0.019636016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.637214e-7,8.205298e-7,0.00012710615,0.00012340589,0.0000010402197,0.000014360858,0.000032771975,0.000014331744,0.0000067894007,0.0007215714,0.9989531,0.000003882077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83936584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9301965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16063416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039796926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07049687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3231603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889006257","doi":"10.5539/ies.v11n9p47","title":"Ethics of the Teaching Profession among Secondary School Teachers from School Leaders’ Perspective in Riyadh","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Perspective (graphical); Ethical code; Sample (material); Medical education; Pedagogy; Professional ethics; Psychology; Descriptive research; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.1374546027186543,"score_gpt":0.5243885732336171,"score_spread":0.3869339705149628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889006257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98638725,0.0009932028,0.00042966695,0.004324362,0.000033574695,0.000022805189,0.0000036369797,0.000004235289,0.007801126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985153,0.00043412336,0.00014243175,0.000224556,0.000009017335,0.0000056128906,0.0000018181873,0.0000013921634,0.00066571956],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913278,0.005746668,0.00030466015,0.00023459522,0.0012361575,0.0011501384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99260545,0.0028453185,0.0019774202,0.00023682615,0.00097400043,0.0013610857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057891784,0.00012505912,0.00022717481,0.0006154302,0.0065414896,0.0038684113,0.00063291634,0.00093588996,0.00056315796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004493757,0.00033546347,0.00012441206,0.0005140437,0.008649173,0.0011628728,0.0017809796,0.0017729923,0.00011311179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033449607,0.00010905177,0.08356913,0.0001556607,0.000008508659,0.0031304732,0.8806717,0.00010793517,0.0021821652,0.013649321,0.0013765803,0.015006164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008910485,0.000098429606,0.054826893,0.00024234531,0.000008661149,0.0019044991,0.91303444,0.00020411996,0.0007180745,0.0017087717,0.027219696,0.000025213085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014986383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028352428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014986383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049613127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012775998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035997033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889167737","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Legal Citation with the 9th edition of the McGill Guide: Citing Unreported Cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.1894977285060953,"score_gpt":0.4738197067210603,"score_spread":0.28432197821496497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889167737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083453883,0.010465781,0.0065350584,0.14083284,0.023536086,0.0010054889,0.009467988,0.003198289,0.80412394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070029423,0.008229298,0.008885477,0.03653433,0.0051725497,0.0016746088,0.0048480355,0.0022701535,0.9253826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9748342,0.0062241014,0.003303438,0.0010914942,0.013130317,0.0014164204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82171834,0.095370814,0.005394842,0.010210175,0.06263795,0.004667832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02264676,0.0010475782,0.0016022384,0.015431389,0.010244559,0.0152716655,0.004737567,0.015674159,0.26781207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16490561,0.0016423833,0.0010865352,0.012009149,0.0060794842,0.010568803,0.004966598,0.008131894,0.15764652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004987203,0.000009576173,0.000036509624,0.000110646935,0.0000011991166,0.000017530861,0.00023685835,0.0000091632255,0.00001968125,0.007870373,0.97944885,0.012234554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000850293,0.000006933459,0.00031348414,0.0009222818,0.0000059561835,0.00003541523,0.0005608604,0.00004699077,0.000109288805,0.0068580923,0.9911102,0.000022138265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072271965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17350955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26781207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009496722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04746835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89592063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889839771","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: New Brunswick","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.1950129672052556,"score_gpt":0.4491901179131567,"score_spread":0.25417715070790114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889839771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007866503,0.006434177,0.004522933,0.005522307,0.0011149411,0.0012234084,0.13184133,0.0031342201,0.84542006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001751394,0.0070117414,0.010923718,0.0006951061,0.00005695541,0.0006141349,0.038548987,0.0013241823,0.9390738],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942063,0.00041174245,0.00051544583,0.00034358632,0.0039005044,0.0006224892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96979386,0.0030665575,0.0004656148,0.0011206169,0.024475854,0.0010775623],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006050945,0.0023274801,0.0019429678,0.020217804,0.010137597,0.012845577,0.004508072,0.0027248324,0.34272346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020904018,0.00288563,0.0014171732,0.043946654,0.0024065936,0.006952215,0.0027672276,0.003843365,0.15987816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009475524,0.0000133548465,0.00015977526,0.00019373171,0.0000020587656,0.000014245828,0.00016609674,0.00011539381,0.00002959268,0.0040762336,0.95546496,0.039755095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000565135,0.0000024015123,0.001196242,0.00030994386,0.000006030617,0.000016471819,0.00036565875,0.00008157086,0.00008921803,0.00072612753,0.9971776,0.0000230342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9656988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34272346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057904843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21157636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9375252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890003896","doi":"","title":"Limiting Lawyer Liberty: How the Statement of Principles Coerces Speech","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Licensee; Obligation; Political science; Law; Diversity (politics); Charter; Statement (logic); Sociology; License","score_opus":0.06096990356583961,"score_gpt":0.36374360187486915,"score_spread":0.30277369830902956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890003896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10627101,0.004531708,0.07829685,0.12510005,0.0015800743,0.000306562,0.00014004644,0.0005735236,0.6832002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414158,0.0010523079,0.0074518826,0.015252716,0.0005744756,0.00031043895,0.000049292812,0.0004044318,0.033488687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96408814,0.021371834,0.0011205924,0.0034603719,0.0063433503,0.0036157197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9370646,0.048552595,0.0031861768,0.0049960753,0.0039672544,0.0022332212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027578313,0.00065284106,0.0006924166,0.0015120029,0.014197243,0.016377257,0.0035804282,0.010636266,0.020193808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088341795,0.0012858816,0.0008745989,0.00091454916,0.050713886,0.017402984,0.01619898,0.01362857,0.0047924896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058597834,0.0000401601,0.0011241753,0.00008394641,0.000012334575,0.0004381112,0.050480966,0.0002873513,0.0008533846,0.92685246,0.009367035,0.010401519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001716287,0.0000944622,0.0017392404,0.00065566954,0.0000530645,0.00042425876,0.020211274,0.002544776,0.0022964969,0.735594,0.23606175,0.00015343948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021086726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0156055335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027578313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0083936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010539767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14584976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890874976","doi":"10.1007/1-4020-3505-5","title":"A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Freie Universität Berlin; Università di Bologna; York University; University of Sussex; University College London","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Philosophy of law; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03334069270551614,"score_gpt":0.3709026200248392,"score_spread":0.33756192731932305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890874976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013789508,0.01150527,0.00970898,0.025503762,0.0016370597,0.00003218539,0.00003751638,0.00003220578,0.9501641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14490683,0.0100340815,0.007011471,0.020429283,0.0027482046,0.00021774811,0.00006203418,0.00012609977,0.8144643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832684,0.00071623054,0.000051384646,0.00015156058,0.00062324083,0.00013069515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986141,0.00089738733,0.000054151904,0.00012313116,0.00024303803,0.00006811339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022558244,0.0004837188,0.0005558319,0.0012462788,0.0038691855,0.0064055086,0.0010693514,0.004810068,0.011017951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035128454,0.00038246816,0.00042830026,0.0012942158,0.019471353,0.006054408,0.0016889748,0.008883598,0.0020066623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.33752e-7,0.000003254597,0.0000056062827,0.0000065331096,4.520601e-7,0.000006597272,0.00040610868,0.00003131879,0.000009504811,0.9873028,0.010277756,0.0019493608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051787188,0.000005383403,0.000082200655,0.00009468213,0.0000026454345,0.000041083455,0.00028963285,0.00017710742,0.000053371736,0.68749446,0.31174868,0.000005508534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0132351285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018396476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0132351285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006301853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055139866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04572332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893586452","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Books","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.22199273254596913,"score_gpt":0.462944602228817,"score_spread":0.24095186968284787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893586452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002771232,0.006601049,0.000996817,0.003660029,0.0009770098,0.0002226913,0.02460919,0.0013750836,0.961281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00088114763,0.005898451,0.0020576622,0.0004800325,0.00008953093,0.00011466545,0.00802008,0.0005730104,0.9818854],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974026,0.00013537094,0.00012648368,0.0001544776,0.001912815,0.00026818278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99142706,0.00095938466,0.0001547461,0.00034025728,0.006582643,0.0005359628],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018321894,0.0015139406,0.0015699809,0.013817155,0.008223955,0.01062431,0.002786858,0.0027831686,0.47732556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009950172,0.0016328037,0.00090297,0.02715187,0.0018961078,0.0059665614,0.0018184157,0.0028122251,0.21529964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000414245,0.0000059377253,0.00003879938,0.000113104295,8.172688e-7,0.000008198283,0.000065609995,0.00004010406,0.0000143433035,0.0038933111,0.963422,0.032393668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018978989,0.0000013900336,0.0003395138,0.00020937083,0.0000024037747,0.000012775163,0.00013151228,0.0000372595,0.000039970444,0.00084992254,0.99836546,0.000008548869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84339947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94949424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9893757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032655384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08537932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7455317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894344267","doi":"","title":"LAWYERS’ ETHICAL OBLIGATIONS, INNOVATIVE MODELS OF LEGAL SERVICE, AND A TIME OF REGULATORY UPHEAVAL:: SETTLEMENT COUNSEL AS AN INSTRUCTIVE MODEL","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Negotiation; Confidentiality; Competence (human resources); Loyalty; Work (physics); Professional responsibility; Law; Public relations; Legal ethics; Political science; Business; Engineering; Management; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.030724492715216923,"score_gpt":0.36565435882615044,"score_spread":0.3349298661109335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894344267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09657426,0.0034119235,0.06977299,0.36171505,0.0011439401,0.00022759827,0.000035307785,0.00017293409,0.46694598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9400001,0.0009895685,0.015568783,0.014562268,0.00021270616,0.00020698989,0.000013160636,0.000069021145,0.028377503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97207415,0.02101433,0.00037815035,0.0011051322,0.0036154303,0.0018128608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865957,0.008915927,0.00092965213,0.0009984571,0.0011634618,0.00139691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02088917,0.00041639368,0.0004606465,0.0014392094,0.021613397,0.023994805,0.0031109243,0.017093632,0.0047945864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023119323,0.00043526385,0.00063689705,0.0012908992,0.06335409,0.021029418,0.012480934,0.013386701,0.0008928257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056292756,0.000022560222,0.00011969155,0.000010211135,7.496865e-7,0.0001443187,0.022979546,0.00012190311,0.00005188378,0.9726792,0.0016420237,0.0022222344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060305072,0.00006158721,0.0003442756,0.0003123707,0.000012382833,0.00072053,0.07638559,0.0031659028,0.000734531,0.69002056,0.22811872,0.000063182655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009274446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011292774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023994805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014781289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02198045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11047387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895014424","doi":"10.4324/9781315421414-14","title":"The Evidentiary Narrative: Notes toward a Symbolic Interactionist Perspective about Evidence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Symbolic interactionism; Narrative; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; The Symbolic; Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Literature; Art; Philosophy; Visual arts","score_opus":0.10461726961524521,"score_gpt":0.43896867721617217,"score_spread":0.33435140760092696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895014424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063557527,0.023577586,0.14030135,0.2763945,0.0022552535,0.0001189346,0.00017376107,0.00009876994,0.5507241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75237596,0.015344947,0.0760599,0.043431822,0.003926793,0.0008933849,0.00017044297,0.00054718053,0.10724969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98362684,0.012610411,0.0005327826,0.0010058066,0.0019157496,0.00030828652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9571753,0.03859694,0.00083421357,0.0013737227,0.0015746625,0.00044514812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020686705,0.0008909689,0.00097673,0.0028583151,0.006382065,0.019764334,0.0035782652,0.009344239,0.0063073495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03528879,0.00072355627,0.0006559504,0.0030790998,0.084000535,0.028377645,0.0055899858,0.018403416,0.0010892199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.632475e-7,0.000001547447,0.000007910279,0.0000149074995,7.75505e-7,0.000011561236,0.0015760947,0.00001764284,0.000010320177,0.9960562,0.0016120587,0.00069010217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038746857,0.0000027779154,0.000023541255,0.00015005252,0.0000022813147,0.000033446744,0.001328699,0.00016774982,0.00004924861,0.95556927,0.042663965,0.0000051353277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004555785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006481391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020686705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008305993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068848203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109403014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895540657","doi":"","title":"What Humility Isn’t: Responsibility and the Judicial Role","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Virtue; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03523697854366416,"score_gpt":0.4107625419211889,"score_spread":0.37552556337752474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895540657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10755465,0.020772198,0.033382244,0.34351853,0.0017811826,0.000042335974,0.000018779776,0.00013462163,0.49279547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97437257,0.0025017152,0.0013387742,0.012315136,0.0005581906,0.000020495718,0.000004321218,0.00004108241,0.008847648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98094696,0.013247626,0.00034926986,0.0010854979,0.0026074483,0.0017631911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98452616,0.010183709,0.0013968849,0.0010246837,0.0014946508,0.0013739212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010771791,0.0003897675,0.00046643242,0.0013946268,0.010937895,0.0121067995,0.0011868316,0.004748473,0.002401147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022887142,0.00028335687,0.00038099271,0.0008087361,0.06263433,0.01068015,0.0068915337,0.0065127052,0.00048732306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008755785,0.000013390557,0.0005970858,0.00003467051,0.0000057400703,0.00013519947,0.026150692,0.00013116973,0.0001385645,0.95977926,0.004235148,0.008770264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014048976,0.000034530647,0.0011300261,0.00030674215,0.0000110395,0.00033993827,0.021980071,0.00043612716,0.00065516314,0.8459685,0.1290903,0.000033680764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037709107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004064312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0121067995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004899327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066320812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056967378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895866880","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1310","title":"A Current Assessment of Legal Aid in Ontario","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Government of Canada; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Legal service; Service provider; Government (linguistics); Poverty; Business; Per capita; Economic Justice; Certificate; Service (business); Inflation (cosmology); Duty; Public economics; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Law; Marketing; Sociology","score_opus":0.07901487436676469,"score_gpt":0.47999810925427805,"score_spread":0.40098323488751336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895866880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7035281,0.010234241,0.0006295811,0.02067668,0.00020071867,0.00024307908,0.016692545,0.00012545534,0.24766955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96186286,0.007211893,0.0007042942,0.0010235015,0.000053822085,0.000066057124,0.003486431,0.000025123005,0.025566101],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952821,0.00019173988,0.00021528227,0.00017456317,0.0029872241,0.0011492057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878687,0.0005928738,0.0016640072,0.0001892502,0.007139283,0.002545824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014828361,0.00025062938,0.00038725254,0.0046917764,0.0051153502,0.0038180996,0.0012613342,0.00046971312,0.00888086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007146957,0.00031367686,0.00046467126,0.01100817,0.0017091451,0.0012520696,0.0018893274,0.0005291195,0.00058343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001583219,0.000080857746,0.7907175,0.0013344787,0.0001629631,0.0006802399,0.017443601,0.0010827751,0.0006483263,0.016515523,0.054034423,0.11714102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011992199,0.000038341674,0.8383399,0.00035805168,0.000053239863,0.00016516086,0.014402954,0.0005308555,0.00013149112,0.00054825336,0.14538147,0.00003827591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99470264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99802494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11924732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11924732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14283524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86520386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896446680","doi":"","title":"Logos, ethos and pathos in balance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Pathos; Ethos; Logos Bible Software; Balance (ability); Aesthetics; Political science; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Literature; Psychology; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.021687970280415116,"score_gpt":0.3409427334892145,"score_spread":0.31925476320879936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896446680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0440736,0.0022554223,0.016808959,0.043054853,0.00067159743,0.000045980916,0.000086416556,0.00007342182,0.89292985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9424107,0.00051402784,0.0016104734,0.001916399,0.0002662005,0.00006194984,0.000036827627,0.000082699684,0.05310065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696547,0.0014103687,0.000103742255,0.0004774987,0.00057227124,0.00047062102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974577,0.0009979518,0.0002991649,0.0003137405,0.00041370324,0.00051776366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041209674,0.0003544884,0.00041326767,0.0016659081,0.0065624556,0.010668181,0.00076543813,0.0037179994,0.026068492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010336559,0.00031413833,0.00024546307,0.0015288193,0.028961144,0.013328082,0.005555644,0.004517617,0.0019441572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011970086,0.0000087724975,0.0002015834,0.000007671647,0.0000015256096,0.000017628461,0.0012313753,0.000065958964,0.000036976944,0.9913077,0.0023910147,0.004717914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012307656,0.000010464476,0.00043910783,0.000036135007,0.0000022987927,0.00002897961,0.001800056,0.00014579127,0.000057627392,0.9589169,0.038543407,0.0000067866604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030557606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003970859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026068492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037031604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045018126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087207735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896662560","doi":"10.15845/voices.v18i3.2570","title":"Justice Values in Kenny’s Theoretical Contributions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Voices A World Forum for Music Therapy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Sociology; Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05898885075020578,"score_gpt":0.42033049416025237,"score_spread":0.3613416434100466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896662560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028199313,0.009560117,0.027430547,0.12037067,0.0013999044,0.000097559736,0.00004642458,0.00005182678,0.8128437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9084362,0.003451125,0.009483094,0.023200095,0.000829413,0.00026362663,0.000022872746,0.00007915876,0.05423438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941772,0.003095199,0.00015820861,0.000850503,0.0010555388,0.00066334463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997239,0.0016952024,0.00019333251,0.00021930604,0.00030523742,0.0003479328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006258551,0.0004747703,0.00071908504,0.0020459031,0.011570893,0.008160574,0.0014180081,0.0051862923,0.004191254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005641111,0.00035220853,0.00050218427,0.0012502677,0.070415445,0.009893887,0.007661776,0.009543151,0.00049498974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001787636,0.000005911919,0.000036699206,0.000005500444,7.9493077e-7,0.000020849884,0.0039173383,0.000027991346,0.000008208552,0.99396425,0.0011176093,0.0008930577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008017396,0.000008307749,0.000118306365,0.0000898296,0.0000030465364,0.000084515246,0.0031633007,0.0001842718,0.000046239435,0.91295934,0.08332419,0.000010637636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01200062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011868271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01200062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008412023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060238047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061033726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896919731","doi":"","title":"Chapter 8: Ethics and Criminal Law Practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Law; Political science; Legal ethics; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.08307823120527272,"score_gpt":0.4498285477572064,"score_spread":0.3667503165519337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896919731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009640197,0.04583476,0.007458982,0.13949095,0.0016938836,0.00011754568,0.00008811316,0.000052992757,0.7956226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41628543,0.061080728,0.011273163,0.047957674,0.002666978,0.00038461093,0.00014553078,0.00013507076,0.4600709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954661,0.0023863174,0.00010947494,0.0002962789,0.0010962805,0.0006454345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976546,0.00107759,0.00015602524,0.00014198176,0.000678174,0.00029169238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027713873,0.00048133856,0.0003787352,0.00079592067,0.0056037675,0.0072065326,0.0010780431,0.004529193,0.011207945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036303885,0.00024169416,0.00024610962,0.0010516003,0.021189548,0.0037177377,0.0023395948,0.004802803,0.002110481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035378566,0.000014425723,0.00029017313,0.000109044304,0.0000021838362,0.00009012141,0.015566565,0.00014881395,0.000106003,0.93519413,0.037360556,0.011114656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041432236,0.000012435309,0.0008904936,0.001096705,0.0000017194415,0.00016754432,0.009886417,0.00012274475,0.00009939195,0.16938138,0.81832653,0.0000104914325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050739955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061744764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050739955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012335386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014883066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100889206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897263024","doi":"10.1017/s1472669618000324","title":"Reflections in the Fishbowl: the Changing Role of Law Librarians in the Mix of an Evolving Legal Profession","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Legal profession; Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03597807165061488,"score_gpt":0.3874668148063581,"score_spread":0.3514887431557432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897263024","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065181695,0.0041146073,0.00116913,0.8911165,0.003281282,0.000042547155,0.00004070811,0.000051467625,0.03500212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7362741,0.0045042736,0.0018847975,0.19798309,0.0020674095,0.00010380939,0.00003508825,0.00031951934,0.05682786],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9629858,0.025780799,0.0005236673,0.0018848834,0.0046720942,0.0041526733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581066,0.024342475,0.0020737841,0.0011517762,0.0036101893,0.0107152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030793035,0.00049405923,0.0006515824,0.0019240241,0.04683284,0.027130013,0.0033807855,0.013942135,0.011852937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039135396,0.0014411042,0.0006135043,0.002730394,0.050706513,0.026657067,0.022056397,0.024910372,0.002040972],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058099664,0.000068649824,0.0012868897,0.00014969753,0.000008205442,0.0013624755,0.82464224,0.000046048186,0.0007828591,0.039332733,0.11992575,0.012336327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008631917,0.000035190405,0.0010698596,0.00021335318,0.000004512308,0.00038247977,0.6718472,0.000046939535,0.00036674945,0.005574163,0.32039854,0.000052321357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058584005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1129316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058584005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02487684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01856027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18049496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897529290","doi":"","title":"The Chutes and Ladders of Precarious Non-Citizen Legal Status Trajectories and Incorporation in Toronto.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 15-21, 2018)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal status; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.018830464904551574,"score_gpt":0.34195924709581643,"score_spread":0.32312878219126484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897529290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.966993,0.0012647297,0.00038340877,0.0063597695,0.000038457565,0.000048015652,0.0009809321,0.000019232148,0.023912381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99427235,0.00032928016,0.00015798779,0.00007529025,0.0000031762681,0.000020377951,0.00021423481,0.000010361699,0.0049169487],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982753,0.00038565134,0.00008030688,0.00018723193,0.00025786136,0.00081365067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99450135,0.00094474136,0.000986023,0.0002618253,0.0009682684,0.0023378227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015856134,0.00017737216,0.00034731402,0.0022320887,0.012578634,0.005033331,0.001139032,0.000929687,0.010781129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010201805,0.00037103173,0.0002188647,0.004498525,0.0064555914,0.0035531237,0.009459361,0.0017716711,0.00046850735],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019446875,0.00006941944,0.2865672,0.00012672305,0.00002807863,0.0005294705,0.5797585,0.00032771737,0.00021308879,0.07973123,0.011865771,0.040588338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008627499,0.000037435926,0.4829101,0.00031756388,0.000022520722,0.000119176664,0.4875726,0.000538155,0.00014291643,0.0044585997,0.023833824,0.000038421476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96176505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044476427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044476427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048533533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32270056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897592736","doi":"10.4324/9781315268798","title":"The Relational Ethics of Narrative Inquiry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative inquiry; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.24324784666883173,"score_gpt":0.48714062511014145,"score_spread":0.24389277844130972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897592736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052473242,0.036788706,0.0599132,0.047426324,0.003128039,0.00027159657,0.00011525594,0.00022901672,0.8468806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51201785,0.038066898,0.07498536,0.02528976,0.003960519,0.0020405583,0.00026125147,0.00046889664,0.34290895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802319,0.015459531,0.00038661988,0.00076395547,0.0025688072,0.0005891922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98903114,0.008361076,0.00057447253,0.0008699016,0.0007581222,0.00040538993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008986274,0.0007222873,0.00045355933,0.0014250991,0.0064823055,0.015237355,0.0016199743,0.003271984,0.003682317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012003436,0.00045481467,0.0004740592,0.001540986,0.050252296,0.012354793,0.0071587036,0.007174266,0.0011723047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000209265,0.0000026098696,0.00003546802,0.000057815447,0.0000019548866,0.00004841112,0.013018535,0.000035241475,0.000024552097,0.9720756,0.010511593,0.0041860966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006897048,0.000009942381,0.000114321425,0.00062224036,0.0000039989104,0.00028171667,0.010436319,0.00028506544,0.00013332732,0.42255268,0.56554264,0.000010905853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037483915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004245115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015237355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00714745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073568258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051858604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898100169","doi":"10.11575/prism/32514","title":"Self-represented Litigants in Family Law Disputes: Views of Alberta Lawyers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Family law; Political science","score_opus":0.14086436602935176,"score_gpt":0.45055547390985345,"score_spread":0.3096911078805017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898100169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99488395,0.00014020652,0.000046767233,0.0010636902,0.0000071637846,0.000010152344,0.000014353971,0.0000019682907,0.0038317926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965115,0.00027733002,0.00006046441,0.00038424687,0.000005452384,0.0000065063537,0.000024365308,0.0000018876298,0.0027281505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955753,0.0013431526,0.000115926814,0.0002785553,0.0016481229,0.0010389289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924418,0.0016664717,0.0015285434,0.0001614064,0.0016057526,0.0025960344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040591485,0.0001601263,0.00023583835,0.0017611461,0.009268004,0.0037908973,0.0014792617,0.0011402685,0.004436536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009549409,0.00036423866,0.00019272119,0.00166558,0.0036979867,0.0011383204,0.003308771,0.0016158834,0.00026235686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007774994,0.00030896676,0.25282446,0.000054550335,0.00001850351,0.0018704545,0.71210194,0.000098428645,0.0011846708,0.0013742108,0.0038809904,0.026205115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000622918,0.00006971765,0.17776832,0.00006913138,0.0000069012376,0.00034347532,0.81268525,0.0001468025,0.00013567641,0.00015890537,0.008589947,0.000019660529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7370293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84847987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98319006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01680995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01442701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5290387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898542783","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Legal Citation with the 9th edition of the McGill Guide: Citing Cases that are Freely Available Online","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; History; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2575314722265055,"score_gpt":0.45013798898233376,"score_spread":0.19260651675582824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898542783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007975834,0.0029449647,0.0033533622,0.038970593,0.007936972,0.00096152246,0.013375224,0.0025523102,0.92910755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0052174386,0.002641894,0.0053496184,0.010556717,0.001417341,0.0014968576,0.006525413,0.0021071264,0.9646876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826179,0.0035749022,0.0021853012,0.000925009,0.009369902,0.0013270141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8949924,0.04619503,0.0034117668,0.009042244,0.042320445,0.00403813],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015730582,0.0009901286,0.0016619223,0.013357154,0.009848991,0.014960023,0.004005683,0.012699968,0.39937818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12939252,0.001562246,0.0009856157,0.012219149,0.0040788003,0.009949167,0.0045603286,0.0070667826,0.28713933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075537696,0.000014592452,0.000038872626,0.000102663435,0.0000010319792,0.000019837713,0.0002490674,0.000008892863,0.00002913603,0.008845295,0.9797729,0.010910144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009597509,0.000006386361,0.00033412216,0.0005918883,0.0000042220167,0.000029642335,0.00053459674,0.000041177784,0.0001249966,0.0057265568,0.9925774,0.000019386394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0587991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13566488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98503995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008240337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036554545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8567141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900244530","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2018.1526472","title":"Legal Education and Training Review: a five-year retro/prospective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Commission; Political science; Legal education; Public relations; Space (punctuation); Legal service; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.04471215414005692,"score_gpt":0.39390933480847723,"score_spread":0.3491971806684203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900244530","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0102278385,0.7260957,0.0017476054,0.15029405,0.084250696,0.0073874695,0.005904703,0.00026885286,0.013823135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051770996,0.67132825,0.008748888,0.19132647,0.027092207,0.01207954,0.0071747815,0.00032279143,0.030156143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9288912,0.017261289,0.013479012,0.0028593855,0.03362402,0.0038851106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72247416,0.06578502,0.042995542,0.010744078,0.14428447,0.013716682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11010045,0.00091944024,0.0033773459,0.024095621,0.003161699,0.010665952,0.0030162267,0.008835058,0.005809292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12795307,0.0020071273,0.0035869617,0.01587862,0.0022196611,0.00645516,0.006958436,0.004972465,0.0040778476],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092511065,0.00078947813,0.004758945,0.07413438,0.0010867584,0.0012118221,0.0018238004,0.00025412804,0.0022171848,0.006012635,0.6437487,0.2630371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017885209,0.00053777837,0.014235094,0.055358395,0.0006817815,0.0004868511,0.00091280794,0.00014832905,0.0005412364,0.00044443092,0.92639256,0.00008176351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068185595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024368143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11010045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012002831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056464907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5822738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900273955","doi":"","title":"Litigation Risk Analysis: Using Rigorous Projections to Encourage and Inform Settlement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Dimension (graph theory); Work (physics); Task (project management); Risk assessment; Actuarial science; Public relations; Economic Justice; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Business; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Economics; Computer security; Finance; Management","score_opus":0.031795092776903455,"score_gpt":0.39637626671071313,"score_spread":0.3645811739338097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900273955","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07354585,0.0013353358,0.7944505,0.050214484,0.0004195058,0.0012093461,0.00029393475,0.0018279889,0.07670301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5891427,0.0008855331,0.4048063,0.0011424035,0.00013165966,0.00089336926,0.00023008786,0.0003374218,0.0024304613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.78534657,0.168417,0.009836619,0.0059882053,0.027034752,0.0033768052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7150007,0.20417406,0.024675898,0.024947003,0.027129358,0.004073014],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1896933,0.0016854473,0.0013145562,0.007230148,0.008901434,0.024471683,0.0059030075,0.005718503,0.009202016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3508925,0.0014653814,0.001343346,0.0035791341,0.012305839,0.037997685,0.028844588,0.010457662,0.0029220534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025076562,0.00032803102,0.012570945,0.00080446363,0.00012334085,0.00072718726,0.13512643,0.01372286,0.0027106744,0.45417693,0.018219655,0.36123878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006511614,0.00022079803,0.004547719,0.001608898,0.00005896356,0.0005337214,0.057120737,0.04271712,0.003071173,0.80324477,0.08647605,0.00033490174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036558826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004543452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1896933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007848095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02765277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900274025","doi":"","title":"Suggestions for Reforms at the National Law Universities Set Up Through State Legislations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Public relations; Political science; Legal education; Narrative; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.05235783023406502,"score_gpt":0.39596094750929234,"score_spread":0.3436031172752273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900274025","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23128462,0.0037215382,0.008053793,0.6059342,0.0019276214,0.0005879151,0.0002256747,0.0003620488,0.14790268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93259656,0.0019963651,0.009929971,0.031251628,0.00022221936,0.00021483013,0.00007954554,0.00003702134,0.023671743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811949,0.010362128,0.0005905317,0.0008432513,0.0014727308,0.0055364124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819389,0.0060823956,0.0015216245,0.001462562,0.0033680059,0.0056264773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017092766,0.0002342631,0.00028459716,0.0012033078,0.008083845,0.012574702,0.0021193346,0.0068788636,0.01061427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02784072,0.00033538768,0.00054769585,0.0013883845,0.005740688,0.009454627,0.004896878,0.006153024,0.00129154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114013834,0.00061119936,0.034236446,0.0006134338,0.000027036274,0.0024348306,0.10496308,0.0019696762,0.0028156852,0.62291616,0.11985039,0.10944803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034860725,0.00025893658,0.042984452,0.0014969038,0.000047083195,0.00048015304,0.2568639,0.0012561926,0.0026158527,0.04873378,0.64503497,0.00019291941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019775087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06102591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019775087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017698094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047310658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12840927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900299709","doi":"10.4324/9781315544984-4","title":"Qualitative Ethics in Practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.3006342762805737,"score_gpt":0.5790596887246426,"score_spread":0.27842541244406893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900299709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021255498,0.043173138,0.14289105,0.29568195,0.016265543,0.0015915822,0.00032832226,0.00073330593,0.4972095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22972706,0.052243557,0.37427735,0.14763495,0.009682548,0.013538282,0.00062350556,0.0017839975,0.17048869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8365379,0.14229818,0.0040431493,0.0037829217,0.011023502,0.002314385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8508202,0.122540325,0.0030622978,0.012881153,0.007276999,0.0034190086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09233429,0.0012707562,0.0019575255,0.0032848842,0.010792322,0.026137408,0.004565804,0.009930439,0.016629968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08085841,0.0014445309,0.0009974388,0.0050933897,0.0656384,0.018931901,0.015354885,0.017115429,0.0072850455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008220177,0.000023356975,0.00009290643,0.00048734766,0.000007960631,0.000058612903,0.01996748,0.00013972228,0.000054300068,0.9154566,0.040308844,0.023394614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013917825,0.000024677685,0.000077648125,0.0020695624,0.0000036273102,0.0001363971,0.012421787,0.00021077198,0.00009085762,0.38195482,0.6029782,0.000017807755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029949027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002788275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09233429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01213189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023812173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48831624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901057521","doi":"","title":"The Changing Landscape of Corporate Legal Practice: An Empirical Study of Lawyers in Large Corporate Law Firms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Corporate law; Practice of law; Legal ethics; Competition (biology); Business; Legal profession; Law; Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Legal practice; Public relations; Political science; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.17104935254128212,"score_gpt":0.4277385962548079,"score_spread":0.2566892437135258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901057521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951298,0.00033066788,0.00010934031,0.0015360243,0.000007589323,0.000054107408,0.000022486187,0.0000022922854,0.0028076898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968231,0.00052103045,0.00019675995,0.0007558436,0.00001138498,0.000027005837,0.000032108353,0.000006909674,0.0016258144],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881054,0.0042275996,0.00030981074,0.0009923032,0.0030062227,0.0033586128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9577661,0.0203016,0.007400117,0.00077405735,0.005828461,0.007929618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006870646,0.00024198813,0.00069079816,0.0048207436,0.02291332,0.010284277,0.0033469794,0.002913249,0.004164982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032117497,0.0009514467,0.00018138973,0.006879704,0.014964838,0.004504568,0.005515579,0.0046189525,0.0003558889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002331711,0.00020611421,0.05075205,0.000052526077,0.000006724915,0.0007220756,0.9367646,0.00003400938,0.0003897862,0.0011613214,0.00078941084,0.009098042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041196763,0.000035379984,0.051471177,0.000051450967,0.0000036871954,0.00009837366,0.94354194,0.00006212152,0.000044366538,0.0001041524,0.004570664,0.0000125061515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71958137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9114966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71958137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03661324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03869851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56414014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901240236","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Yukon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.23133669998070308,"score_gpt":0.4739042812642327,"score_spread":0.2425675812835296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901240236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010209016,0.005260953,0.004459396,0.0057892874,0.0011879338,0.0009954614,0.1231571,0.004809432,0.85331964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023630557,0.0047795875,0.008659424,0.0007163558,0.00006077566,0.00052584865,0.034759887,0.0018637016,0.9462714],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99338526,0.0005028322,0.00055759016,0.00038431128,0.004452389,0.00071762037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963269,0.0035189758,0.0005474982,0.0013100355,0.030116575,0.0012378286],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005460264,0.0019706308,0.0018890791,0.018123588,0.010899782,0.013071498,0.0037739251,0.0031151564,0.39828593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023349367,0.0025389004,0.0013679035,0.03462822,0.0023850764,0.0073317895,0.0031199877,0.0032402542,0.20115833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011946749,0.000012948152,0.0001496879,0.00017832896,0.0000019651893,0.000012543581,0.00017380569,0.00009970099,0.000026156535,0.0036690787,0.9577086,0.037955314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006766182,0.0000030707965,0.0012142718,0.00031151593,0.0000064447217,0.000019445846,0.000451495,0.00010856661,0.00010021101,0.00079564616,0.9969572,0.000025470998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93623495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97595596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39828593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041160274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16065842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8582721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901474831","doi":"10.7202/1070744ar","title":"If It's the Institution That's Causing the Decline, Change the Institution: Comment on Colgan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.3376601811127925,"score_gpt":0.4505502187082927,"score_spread":0.1128900375955002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901474831","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043051617,0.0006343286,0.0001053394,0.98678374,0.0063190805,0.000012369668,0.000095428055,0.000026561553,0.005592528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031294718,0.0002701093,0.00011204034,0.98565626,0.0023556119,0.000044480374,0.00002707893,0.000033848017,0.008371132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934355,0.0013273662,0.0005059176,0.0013235197,0.0022710431,0.001136642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98150074,0.010849974,0.00081798073,0.0004978032,0.005070288,0.0012632167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069924565,0.0009639297,0.0015849167,0.0009711055,0.011940243,0.0075057913,0.005428117,0.056572028,0.013049833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033797827,0.0012490888,0.0017546336,0.0013494156,0.012095987,0.012152125,0.0054696198,0.07414494,0.009408371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029816067,0.000007559834,0.00019746093,0.00005254015,0.0000050847684,0.0001944734,0.000901715,0.000027926599,0.00012061397,0.005603598,0.9919743,0.00088490156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006843004,0.000044571483,0.0022503787,0.0005895023,0.00004741701,0.0005125522,0.008036057,0.00022668598,0.00066315493,0.013283055,0.974102,0.00017628784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09602932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1491285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09602932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009456073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011578159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19094074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902649824","doi":"10.3138/9781442660601-016","title":"13. Growing Legal Aid Ontario into the Middle Class: A Proposal for Public Legal Expenses Insurance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Actuarial science; Business; Middle class; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07733204844188152,"score_gpt":0.27966674011973597,"score_spread":0.20233469167785445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902649824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01949349,0.0059221163,0.0011258911,0.10758816,0.0022411754,0.0005743304,0.0015069443,0.00014500319,0.8614029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033687852,0.0010389884,0.0005809755,0.012947274,0.0002521096,0.00013733249,0.00011111367,0.000032452022,0.951212],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857235,0.000074670585,0.000033748784,0.00009817828,0.00038902354,0.0008319566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999064,0.00013140161,0.00003507211,0.00002446164,0.00030658796,0.00043858436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012075084,0.00050060276,0.0002805981,0.0009736115,0.010059138,0.005147993,0.0013500468,0.011483727,0.032059547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016613314,0.00071295374,0.0005990543,0.0010963394,0.0020231872,0.0015867219,0.0015373578,0.0049921987,0.003308601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047567828,0.000105310944,0.003535415,0.00009680692,0.0000074042914,0.0005794633,0.0051985476,0.00021247142,0.00066590065,0.31082413,0.6507274,0.027999647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002691506,0.000021158598,0.011865482,0.000085407344,0.000011035043,0.000059795908,0.0015052573,0.00012490392,0.00017791052,0.002334221,0.9837624,0.000025440346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9433795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95423365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04576634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08198214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33205956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902739474","doi":"","title":"Persons with Disabilities and Justice Making on Canada's Juries - a Followup Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 15-21, 2018)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Public administration; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.047547259881488904,"score_gpt":0.37300413875915356,"score_spread":0.32545687887766467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902739474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.977773,0.0006802897,0.000037267167,0.0055535994,0.00008529604,0.00011298284,0.00051623303,0.0000054861025,0.0152357975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99114686,0.0003863663,0.000070320704,0.00084809004,0.00002760369,0.000034515375,0.00015312168,0.000006005789,0.007327121],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935022,0.0009547206,0.0002124913,0.0003928657,0.0019966117,0.0029411195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97177124,0.0057201893,0.003344939,0.0006389037,0.011119262,0.0074054967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034665768,0.00025988225,0.00078177307,0.0028405625,0.026762078,0.0068778563,0.0031447413,0.003443012,0.010450291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032281574,0.00056059187,0.0006256013,0.0041648694,0.0044300035,0.0016673123,0.0040615858,0.0055746306,0.00054629234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005977491,0.0021441544,0.7779524,0.0001462145,0.00014273921,0.0011709634,0.14299569,0.0005974103,0.00025647695,0.011611403,0.029032718,0.03335214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083264924,0.00017076985,0.73982054,0.00031433775,0.00011601396,0.00015591121,0.2295766,0.00042526532,0.00019542036,0.0011917588,0.027825547,0.00012454996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99825853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115844555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.115844555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23724233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.840515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903852579","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: The Constitution","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.22927160320117984,"score_gpt":0.4654791525885181,"score_spread":0.23620754938733823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903852579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007754826,0.004529143,0.002575025,0.017463988,0.0015665679,0.0010209292,0.06414181,0.0020270555,0.9059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026081265,0.0034587504,0.0056173895,0.0038114076,0.00013327785,0.0006851968,0.01566505,0.00095311773,0.96706754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98016614,0.0014308268,0.0011985851,0.000747899,0.014322065,0.0021344759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9414655,0.00774343,0.0007792995,0.0026097042,0.045221064,0.0021810157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012766781,0.0015875099,0.001743177,0.015228549,0.015501012,0.018805506,0.0052336855,0.009277663,0.22290093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040681034,0.0030423892,0.001338124,0.025770739,0.0046742274,0.008413113,0.0033504982,0.008118275,0.108091004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007730898,0.000014563025,0.00007910946,0.00009940013,0.0000015160626,0.000011398774,0.00019660327,0.00006159346,0.000029821149,0.017656848,0.96930087,0.012540549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059993044,0.0000025945856,0.00092649215,0.00024883234,0.000005080751,0.000011901336,0.000315447,0.000056942077,0.00008108792,0.001536136,0.9967777,0.000031686814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9613779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98239636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9104497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08955033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32864496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7456779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903917501","doi":"10.4324/9781315098159-8","title":"Corruption in today’s Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.055435109100460546,"score_gpt":0.35243456549865054,"score_spread":0.29699945639819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903917501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014227803,0.073448785,0.0007406728,0.09575372,0.002200063,0.000033229844,0.00037914384,0.00012835638,0.8130882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28870827,0.07961088,0.0012908711,0.025129013,0.0009151761,0.000035403697,0.0003647888,0.00016368816,0.60378194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986527,0.00008133114,0.000017420836,0.00010142164,0.00062133593,0.0005258337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999129,0.00009111654,0.000034700162,0.000032405733,0.0004427453,0.00027016076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051048974,0.00037626715,0.00030367554,0.001729835,0.014961983,0.008565677,0.0007656782,0.0019410722,0.011139496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013169384,0.00026505336,0.0003207955,0.004132296,0.0064491015,0.001939495,0.0014048663,0.0031050988,0.001121747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013818878,0.00001670121,0.0014846178,0.00012459642,0.000008633987,0.0002441878,0.0060718153,0.0005645675,0.00012823207,0.600487,0.33034754,0.060508378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026782177,0.0000029444777,0.001645828,0.00013728293,0.000005141175,0.00006098176,0.0013990625,0.00012595544,0.000075976386,0.008978035,0.9875502,0.000015871841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99413246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14492862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14492862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16090998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904272788","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v25i3.769","title":"Law &amp; Entrepreneurship in Global Clinical Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Legal education; Social entrepreneurship; Mindset; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.14565861669136773,"score_gpt":0.5905020535367205,"score_spread":0.44484343684535277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904272788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08069535,0.019920787,0.0029017017,0.3692288,0.0013356002,0.000121050696,0.000068699585,0.00017562805,0.5255524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86589426,0.011656486,0.0025990228,0.04592591,0.0005859483,0.00011075576,0.000064283566,0.00007087997,0.0730924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971219,0.0014044496,0.0000721107,0.0002541024,0.00034337517,0.0008040032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919036,0.0018212995,0.0005908757,0.00025867118,0.0004163108,0.005009188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037945653,0.00018527238,0.00014527584,0.001075404,0.0045520044,0.010969759,0.00060029374,0.0033177242,0.016849583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055916905,0.00019060423,0.00017758487,0.0015712192,0.011568958,0.005397339,0.010917291,0.004903218,0.0012806967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023863053,0.00026788496,0.018499883,0.00028767914,0.000008763604,0.0013304699,0.026242578,0.000435812,0.0003211998,0.5862991,0.11197391,0.25430888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027232269,0.000098206605,0.019210838,0.0012950267,0.0000058931214,0.0009943661,0.041400466,0.0005269141,0.00024212047,0.12854488,0.8076254,0.000028591312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039166184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009755593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016849583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00566212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016497998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056367457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905557790","doi":"","title":"A SURVEY OF CANADIAN JUDGES ABOUT THEIR MEETINGS WITH CHILDREN: BECOMING MORE COMMON BUT STILL CONTENTIOUS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Good practice; Psychology; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07248963929508759,"score_gpt":0.33564688591892394,"score_spread":0.2631572466238363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905557790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820186,0.0025968626,0.0002138157,0.003763677,0.000073557494,0.00008859892,0.00021574233,0.000011581818,0.011017664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913015,0.002832691,0.00035090325,0.0015623025,0.00005142038,0.000056139917,0.00016555323,0.00001608469,0.0036634053],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98131436,0.005160423,0.0008101087,0.0011957384,0.008472379,0.0030469224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95269585,0.012059091,0.010466688,0.0008429568,0.016890116,0.007045247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011322831,0.00038741756,0.0006665673,0.0037547234,0.014451628,0.0049389554,0.002117476,0.0017841647,0.0024750035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04264816,0.00075937854,0.00035314992,0.005266837,0.0065678516,0.0013041252,0.0032151865,0.0030203736,0.0002658503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059285634,0.000035224737,0.09921781,0.0001992312,0.000022561251,0.0013815849,0.87188727,0.000035520035,0.0016767099,0.00094406947,0.0057346206,0.018806182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066741036,0.00006792372,0.18666284,0.00027259026,0.000013976006,0.0006517195,0.769883,0.000059927203,0.00020584161,0.00009298887,0.04200116,0.000081355465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9073836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.960639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09261638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03779685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04443773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27423668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905698313","doi":"10.3968/10442","title":"A Brief Study on Unofficial Petition for Administrative Matters in Chinese Universities and Colleges","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Negotiation; Administration (probate law); Public relations; Reciprocal; Political science; China; Law; Business; Public administration; Process (computing); Computer science","score_opus":0.04490860466614107,"score_gpt":0.4053158937047331,"score_spread":0.36040728903859204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905698313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98123986,0.0012537021,0.0001635068,0.002847415,0.00008102924,0.0001264511,0.00006519332,0.0000048837205,0.014217903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840514,0.0025543375,0.00020801513,0.0010890502,0.000075941425,0.000089603665,0.00010935806,0.0000054280217,0.011817075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972588,0.0007709161,0.00020209525,0.00020461013,0.00050312374,0.0010604152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99544036,0.0016952163,0.00091278146,0.00013697123,0.0007935467,0.0010210853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027964993,0.00035102322,0.0003851143,0.0027409326,0.012138704,0.0034698297,0.0009790331,0.0015974134,0.0057126638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007059091,0.00044088336,0.00037956072,0.0052724234,0.003525033,0.0026723617,0.0021372684,0.0020439648,0.00035862924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001325574,0.0008682336,0.20417741,0.00086769066,0.000020022337,0.006449535,0.67695445,0.00021234837,0.0015877719,0.031127071,0.0098250145,0.06777796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069322978,0.00022390956,0.27148664,0.00029742005,0.0000188293,0.0008296091,0.68008333,0.0002542748,0.0005188201,0.0006522314,0.045572102,0.000055991757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13518964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15242998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13518964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015222895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01458885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2688055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906213088","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5277","title":"What Are We Waiting For? It’s Time to Regulate Paralegals in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Statutory law; Economic Justice; Jurisdiction; Duty; Law; Nothing; Public interest; Political science; Confidentiality; Public administration","score_opus":0.10535361073010306,"score_gpt":0.40775622145511653,"score_spread":0.30240261072501345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906213088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09949617,0.017568085,0.0018055147,0.7478129,0.0028228525,0.000117861164,0.0002967868,0.000108532106,0.12997119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75976264,0.015739992,0.002539358,0.13828017,0.0004005628,0.000061962484,0.00026464,0.00013312543,0.0828175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908087,0.00092981895,0.00014024437,0.0006075347,0.0027402549,0.0047734617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770452,0.0019781352,0.0007564729,0.00028693242,0.0061510904,0.01378223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040068226,0.0002667875,0.00051679317,0.0010083013,0.037432134,0.011572005,0.0028228948,0.004614193,0.009966184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011781595,0.00040934476,0.00044367102,0.0018495446,0.013135932,0.0034944508,0.004251225,0.010149666,0.00072887685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008767147,0.000254484,0.027370268,0.00046050258,0.0000568025,0.001577086,0.058363214,0.00075756747,0.001394601,0.2326113,0.5185262,0.15854031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037946156,0.000073065115,0.033780724,0.00097283116,0.00006615971,0.0003462655,0.077373326,0.0006271164,0.00072698895,0.014478963,0.87128514,0.00023149072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99705625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8373509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16264908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43415302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9712084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906297604","doi":"10.29173/alr1335","title":"Raising the Bar: Maximizing Civility in Alberta Courtrooms","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Incivility; Raising (metalworking); General partnership; Law; Bar (unit); Political science; Sociology; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07295229427646253,"score_gpt":0.3888356265131147,"score_spread":0.31588333223665216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906297604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4268967,0.003083953,0.0067504877,0.052378986,0.00029869183,0.00014013812,0.000036319103,0.00018124603,0.5102334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643364,0.00060586195,0.0017850169,0.0022841657,0.00004880423,0.000018323888,0.000018176419,0.000017228529,0.030886007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926294,0.0023935416,0.00009969229,0.00038331744,0.002609344,0.0018847557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611723,0.00094615365,0.00033878107,0.0001399188,0.0008329027,0.0016250452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00325047,0.000186774,0.0001826062,0.0016488777,0.019023847,0.008531398,0.001987187,0.003826019,0.009881059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011032622,0.0003942782,0.00016675657,0.0012840555,0.009480768,0.002922998,0.007865327,0.0030774274,0.0010158883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011476134,0.00040189392,0.021118624,0.00021664862,0.000022258662,0.0023068967,0.03246879,0.0042865295,0.005186399,0.6304154,0.056483813,0.24697803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014586745,0.0004034024,0.1324667,0.0007727523,0.00006793255,0.000810061,0.11257765,0.0061824988,0.0061118226,0.18088064,0.55934507,0.00023562052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43669596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8491764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97432506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025674911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045738507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8683082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909162287","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2018.25682","title":"Mandatory Reporting of Health Professional Incompetence and Incapacity: Is it Time to Adopt the Australian Regime?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandatory reporting; Public relations; Professional standards; Business; Political science; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Environmental health","score_opus":0.42303517331699064,"score_gpt":0.4649799143239335,"score_spread":0.04194474100694284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909162287","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22264798,0.01107826,0.015075857,0.66401964,0.002273909,0.00030117348,0.00025881297,0.00018583468,0.084158555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87799597,0.00671629,0.019769592,0.08151183,0.0011001669,0.0003505007,0.00020512663,0.00007009298,0.012280492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9471353,0.024992779,0.0045673274,0.0028670358,0.015610453,0.0048271334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8328918,0.074273124,0.036736745,0.013103868,0.034182772,0.0088117495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.067729324,0.00020171609,0.00044476942,0.0024731017,0.0074239825,0.0077952044,0.003702499,0.005525687,0.0021695008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18616481,0.000712809,0.0006496871,0.0023034392,0.013403213,0.009126758,0.006598627,0.010712247,0.00042554128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021738485,0.00038687605,0.09935539,0.0014633139,0.00007776691,0.0014932699,0.15851873,0.0007028534,0.0031083,0.34521276,0.0598587,0.32960463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007107889,0.0006877618,0.33537546,0.008733423,0.00019802799,0.0018961864,0.09534238,0.0034786218,0.004012948,0.07530397,0.47424495,0.00065521634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19700155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23487459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19700155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017808992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051416013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39170974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911695068","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3311712","title":"Canada's Law Societies Need a Civil Service","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil service; Law; Political science; Service (business); Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Public administration; Commercial law; Sociology; Business; Public service","score_opus":0.010974096630318989,"score_gpt":0.2867941685970908,"score_spread":0.2758200719667718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911695068","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018657614,0.0016604144,0.0007693515,0.79471684,0.004721504,0.00023244423,0.0005159672,0.00031684566,0.17840907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23472372,0.0028025308,0.0048188167,0.40661448,0.0013006872,0.00015897113,0.00054851343,0.00020293739,0.34882927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882322,0.00072158076,0.0001954754,0.0004957506,0.004331403,0.006023686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95875084,0.0031429166,0.0009811466,0.0005992895,0.010846408,0.025679298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040889666,0.0005085151,0.0006699022,0.0022888277,0.031217407,0.015113527,0.0027810838,0.018430043,0.06358183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018097823,0.0006066993,0.0012183157,0.0020193618,0.0072800466,0.0036878898,0.0067775077,0.013731759,0.0049221627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039770577,0.00012854073,0.007118069,0.00019421312,0.000039626484,0.00061732606,0.0022672536,0.00042692327,0.00038716494,0.10346931,0.84839135,0.036920413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006354905,0.000039695115,0.009729675,0.00019515195,0.000031379477,0.00011477929,0.011953868,0.0002673903,0.0001653263,0.010155266,0.967222,0.00006193939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97183293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08854813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08854813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5105545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64246464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911722754","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1313","title":"Physicians, Nurse Practitioners and ODSP Applications: Towards a New Model of Partnership with Community Legal Clinics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; General partnership; Health professionals; Health care; Work (physics); Nursing; Test (biology); Order (exchange); Legal profession; Task (project management); Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Business; Law; Psychiatry; Management","score_opus":0.10815991247699112,"score_gpt":0.4601460141389525,"score_spread":0.35198610166196137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911722754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20886636,0.0013333207,0.040408295,0.45488447,0.0011589462,0.0005391975,0.00003309452,0.00026165458,0.29251468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94709545,0.0007783468,0.014697808,0.0145683475,0.00019780165,0.00035531895,0.000020144254,0.00006466011,0.022222139],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9519045,0.036901787,0.0006576131,0.0019667442,0.0038645365,0.004704848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9442371,0.01599913,0.0030261273,0.0016198126,0.004513421,0.030604508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026244618,0.0004130152,0.00032106045,0.0020886906,0.035306834,0.026696933,0.004640566,0.008549648,0.0074842605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030971535,0.0010997149,0.00043267047,0.0015219961,0.035651106,0.019957028,0.031559743,0.010571715,0.0013869156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005270482,0.0006304225,0.015104613,0.00013767697,0.000014894913,0.002893933,0.6101298,0.00042425736,0.0005309082,0.27540982,0.03255573,0.062115293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006474737,0.00022216924,0.0047785994,0.00052467437,0.000012127501,0.0015758735,0.67441976,0.0019202288,0.00021262668,0.084132954,0.23206066,0.00007566104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03589831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09028018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03589831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01655851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07864338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13879651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911956292","doi":"","title":"Graduate Study in Criminology and Criminal Justice: A Program Guide","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Section (typography); Political science; Brick and mortar; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Business; Computer science; History; World Wide Web; Advertising; The Internet","score_opus":0.2736474296258677,"score_gpt":0.49195910902165485,"score_spread":0.21831167939578716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911956292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019756455,0.030447353,0.007908085,0.0286504,0.0052063493,0.000895535,0.0021167244,0.0025058312,0.92029405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027957524,0.025251735,0.0094887195,0.0084478855,0.0006149512,0.0005202693,0.0014192924,0.00052779954,0.9509336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951684,0.000073327035,0.00002309753,0.00004969019,0.00028226437,0.000054808388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950695,0.000101834965,0.00002316509,0.000025184681,0.00016747562,0.00017534748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005478264,0.00092939957,0.0006975244,0.0011944518,0.0014773858,0.0032901948,0.0008788238,0.0015014689,0.08176836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010858823,0.0006871917,0.00040640397,0.0017146954,0.0005751695,0.0035057482,0.0022763438,0.0037098199,0.09182704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037953664,0.0001075956,0.00009278391,0.000099108,7.842519e-7,0.00003794681,0.00043682283,0.00007322947,0.0001771681,0.004445868,0.8847191,0.10980578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025064764,0.000016759102,0.00038980503,0.00014252317,6.348556e-7,0.00008894409,0.00025225483,0.000039008133,0.000019203288,0.0016669044,0.99737775,0.0000036092918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043617464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015286983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08176836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009929995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004320891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2735424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912581125","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2018.1551677","title":"Governance gone wrong: examining self-regulation of the legal profession","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Duty of loyalty; Statutory law; Accountability; Duty; Legal profession; Loyalty; Law; Duty of care; Function (biology); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Fiduciary; Management","score_opus":0.09074423956251462,"score_gpt":0.41846229647802713,"score_spread":0.3277180569155125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912581125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65249974,0.0017596963,0.007239432,0.06261309,0.00012182162,0.00010523697,0.000037681755,0.000023286566,0.2756001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699295,0.000180821,0.00023871743,0.0009831804,0.000013273803,0.000014888783,0.0000076056426,0.0000044609005,0.0015639497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98014885,0.010201332,0.0004459255,0.001272054,0.0043206387,0.0036113097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97433144,0.011285256,0.0048802984,0.0017282323,0.004884855,0.0028898946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017633341,0.00014736374,0.00032576144,0.0014781717,0.010273857,0.011242812,0.0015376359,0.003097415,0.0015520147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021391306,0.00021465898,0.0004239298,0.0017434111,0.052256472,0.0063640047,0.0050270734,0.003341093,0.00013180825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014281489,0.00007888097,0.029019278,0.000051746156,0.000014455955,0.00019228339,0.17181154,0.00052384567,0.0002225465,0.78666055,0.001634603,0.0097760735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051581956,0.00012163744,0.12976345,0.0007942336,0.000044159155,0.00017375921,0.40859094,0.003963731,0.0007544431,0.33518955,0.12046881,0.0000836632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32802287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31882426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32802287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0506168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050370686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65222716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912979748","doi":"","title":"LAWYERS’ MONOPOLY? THINK AGAIN:: THE REALITY OF NON-LAWYER LEGAL SERVICE PROVISION IN CANADA","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Legal ethics; Legal profession; Law; Statute; Practice of law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Public interest; Legal advice; Duty; Legal research; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.05613086201205925,"score_gpt":0.3658218807234167,"score_spread":0.30969101871135746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912979748","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06382846,0.057065144,0.00096558355,0.74169266,0.001082145,0.00006695529,0.00058023195,0.00004770417,0.13467109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8492574,0.036544368,0.0013560128,0.09271793,0.0007110852,0.000039063205,0.00021088631,0.00006410011,0.019099126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886197,0.001288454,0.00025819323,0.0010199711,0.0053610224,0.0034527392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777323,0.0055148564,0.001572741,0.0004734774,0.0104474835,0.0042590257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006432968,0.00024454226,0.00077453104,0.0027143734,0.017729182,0.013091519,0.003295746,0.0052383095,0.0067569385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024878573,0.00042050108,0.00043905477,0.004839116,0.014682351,0.0042764475,0.0025372645,0.006887733,0.0003968242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070136986,0.00007338337,0.018275,0.0009638485,0.00011611606,0.00096263085,0.024012506,0.0006460232,0.00048321308,0.6403641,0.23403603,0.07999707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009507678,0.000056501143,0.063557684,0.0034213085,0.00024157521,0.0004231746,0.044385258,0.0012774076,0.0005270211,0.046132278,0.8396341,0.00024859482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81973433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18026565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31923857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9507756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913307065","doi":"10.15402/esj.v4i1.322","title":"Wahkohtowin as Paideia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paideia; Socratic method; Greeks; Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Space (punctuation); Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Action (physics); Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Classics; Political science; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.25408097306900657,"score_gpt":0.5051165789936986,"score_spread":0.251035605924692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913307065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5362841,0.0020975682,0.0018289264,0.012869442,0.0014414919,0.00013447905,0.000121238554,0.00011909105,0.44510368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7897193,0.0012494928,0.0014507943,0.0018190792,0.00006032197,0.00006666713,0.00009223001,0.000096741984,0.20544545],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992939,0.00007764819,0.000014502157,0.000082261606,0.00012288673,0.00040865055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938726,0.000058595713,0.000035344052,0.00004172602,0.00007923373,0.00039777465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006102596,0.0002949996,0.00018308112,0.0006646126,0.014523283,0.00503722,0.00085651455,0.001054472,0.014971326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086992054,0.0002784934,0.0001553222,0.00093345606,0.0055698906,0.0024609412,0.006441858,0.0031136717,0.0013955329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015705045,0.00027047718,0.017281858,0.00042048466,0.00001857425,0.0048008906,0.40724647,0.00017741854,0.007976354,0.32801113,0.072448015,0.16119117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008786464,0.000067163106,0.013334585,0.00028004986,0.000009673484,0.0010622487,0.21207486,0.00016411435,0.0007761722,0.0067968452,0.76538646,0.00003897756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08054769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28993925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08054769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006546741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012232393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16015768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913556084","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6838","title":"Whistleblowing in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Language change; Scope (computer science); Private sector; Public sector; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Political science; Business; Public administration; Law; Enforcement","score_opus":0.0530688293364164,"score_gpt":0.38527286743457756,"score_spread":0.3322040380981612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913556084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5721504,0.011210766,0.0009997353,0.09447779,0.0009545001,0.00023020865,0.0017454359,0.00014396674,0.3180873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89774865,0.007231121,0.0010521363,0.009764817,0.00007207079,0.000032351352,0.0004291347,0.000037294176,0.08363249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722904,0.00014487306,0.000059272348,0.00017375402,0.00090696296,0.0014860283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951141,0.00027645743,0.00025871594,0.00008246936,0.002323447,0.0019448651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011631625,0.0002008283,0.0003045285,0.0014921409,0.022041647,0.0041126665,0.0013122552,0.0015656577,0.0071250233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003983778,0.0002860727,0.00032030622,0.0032488788,0.0027896941,0.00079323835,0.0019357697,0.0028589827,0.00040774682],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021547875,0.00038342708,0.13595107,0.00079766574,0.000072771254,0.004442631,0.061722904,0.0020421753,0.002112563,0.31124523,0.2769852,0.2040289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047410456,0.00009827901,0.18021658,0.000657537,0.00007587594,0.00057148817,0.066951476,0.001501813,0.0010046127,0.004741738,0.74396604,0.00016707845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99851054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8611219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13887812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33216208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913770042","doi":"10.5958/2348-1773.2018.00006.1","title":"Assessment of Use and Utilisation of Library Resources, Services and Facilities by Law Students at Kristu Jayanti College of Law, Bangalore","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Horizon College and Seminary","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Law; Library science; Business; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.024204077021458787,"score_gpt":0.3314269666796175,"score_spread":0.30722288965815875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913770042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979032,0.00017132415,0.000028276398,0.00014280049,0.000001552339,0.00002156775,0.00007539775,0.0000027123615,0.0016530853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974868,0.000531163,0.00012738524,0.00007190803,0.0000029396656,0.00001601432,0.000093106675,0.0000018463572,0.0016688015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986833,0.00029189984,0.00017205412,0.00007956973,0.0005211301,0.00025213932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963098,0.00073213753,0.0012970536,0.00010849559,0.0007620806,0.0007903802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010721929,0.00016527837,0.00030398607,0.0019440175,0.001117509,0.0019805648,0.0005531684,0.00046212427,0.004777643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039759483,0.00027684015,0.00026688926,0.0018937367,0.00067770464,0.0010778604,0.0011086959,0.00081224507,0.000737664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044181565,0.00043749413,0.94273174,0.0001867985,0.000026533411,0.0007380718,0.021057505,0.000054865213,0.0012466002,0.0001614454,0.0006953186,0.032619346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026141201,0.00034272842,0.9321059,0.00012262703,0.000019888685,0.0007697071,0.06322688,0.00012457404,0.00042866557,0.000043007887,0.0027870655,0.00002624991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015449207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032461297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015449207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010789416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015620594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030718565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914197159","doi":"","title":"Developments in the Legal Profession: Lizotte, Alberta and Green and the Growing Power of Privilege and Professional Regulators","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Law; Privilege (computing); Statutory law; Political science; Legislature; Supreme court; Legal profession","score_opus":0.013533513104054774,"score_gpt":0.33894501746162237,"score_spread":0.3254115043575676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914197159","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005529,0.027717452,0.00035885227,0.929424,0.0013815851,0.0000075985113,0.000013128261,0.000014161785,0.03555431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29305318,0.037939288,0.0014147136,0.5897672,0.0040393327,0.00003897238,0.000031049272,0.000087326174,0.07362896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882747,0.0034128325,0.0001994938,0.0012577928,0.0043067243,0.002548452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849598,0.0068348753,0.00085563306,0.00042769557,0.002867402,0.0040545533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012520854,0.00034793673,0.0005016544,0.0022730518,0.02757734,0.025996292,0.0029051392,0.020405766,0.003729583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014870368,0.000624826,0.00046550672,0.0028804715,0.06424321,0.013183384,0.0074630836,0.020466851,0.0004304071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023052646,0.00003627195,0.0014351343,0.000052072453,0.0000053143135,0.0002739514,0.022498423,0.00010629489,0.000122846,0.7957766,0.16159087,0.018079268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024905838,0.00001686805,0.0026424765,0.00055429,0.000011572574,0.00017940399,0.029572112,0.00017790176,0.00014785444,0.09951874,0.8670787,0.00007518954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79627705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8803385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79627705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07278815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13120662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5281174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914663746","doi":"10.1017/s1472669600002218","title":"Old Wine in New Bottles ***or Canadian Conference with a difference","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Bursary; Work (physics); Political science; Library science; Association (psychology); Law; Engineering; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03553709044774885,"score_gpt":0.31266349549949457,"score_spread":0.27712640505174574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914663746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017273233,0.0034516284,0.0008081584,0.08241031,0.04302039,0.00008594311,0.001410821,0.0005873067,0.8664982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014534926,0.0023859404,0.0009086201,0.017209023,0.0021780245,0.000033157266,0.00051948446,0.00051589793,0.96171486],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796766,0.00017633922,0.000044339642,0.00022404344,0.0010222802,0.0005652302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499196,0.00015446401,0.000089389825,0.00027498815,0.0016283073,0.0028608646],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015695207,0.0007407692,0.0005189993,0.0015302378,0.015647784,0.016009146,0.00154959,0.0028560734,0.39255586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006161185,0.00042447695,0.00062687194,0.0029004675,0.0031216699,0.0069229635,0.0058690906,0.0071739196,0.082603686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025904646,0.000017532724,0.00017270958,0.000032131178,0.00000369304,0.000038712715,0.00037965918,0.000010082225,0.00013268182,0.009151934,0.9751628,0.014872099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029908945,0.0000038747266,0.00024996538,0.000023679664,0.0000015301204,0.000014982638,0.00094994844,0.0000071138993,0.000034678695,0.0003677001,0.99833566,0.000008010556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46785054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7870281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53214943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0136158075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02012216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9302547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914856190","doi":"10.22230/ijepl.2019v14n8a861","title":"Good Governance and Canadian universities: Fiduciary duties of university governing boards and their implications for shared collegial governance.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Corporate governance; Corporation; Legislation; Corporate law; Law; Legal research; Political science; Public administration; Business; Accounting; Duty; Finance","score_opus":0.06922632407415372,"score_gpt":0.34594835853400424,"score_spread":0.27672203445985055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914856190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15238146,0.008322589,0.01816061,0.124499515,0.0006693778,0.00016607622,0.0001851997,0.00007231176,0.69554293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828232,0.00089869514,0.0016119526,0.0028250532,0.000057706366,0.000024873509,0.00002869842,0.000010764485,0.011719094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98220426,0.004059594,0.00036848377,0.0013012742,0.006595383,0.0054710866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817957,0.0052019022,0.0020186666,0.0013095982,0.0052510276,0.0044229706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010172428,0.00031586,0.00041909702,0.0027879118,0.03130233,0.015155881,0.0021986521,0.004125659,0.003858441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034129485,0.00040271145,0.000360588,0.003699102,0.04206803,0.0050516105,0.0068420083,0.0044516795,0.00019292637],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046945765,0.0000058714118,0.0015600163,0.000016255284,0.000003367343,0.00004870091,0.007858677,0.00016959054,0.000043184977,0.9792579,0.0033421535,0.0076896474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039542636,0.000028191904,0.037087817,0.0006530337,0.000050050876,0.00017677623,0.036809247,0.0016663034,0.0004018812,0.5582978,0.36460868,0.00018067399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9296767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9682616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96869767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.122721046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1865398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8904077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916175080","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v8i1.780","title":"Editorial 8(1)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.09329351313903278,"score_gpt":0.5109924127027974,"score_spread":0.4176988995637646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916175080","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007485259,0.0032765425,0.0002172303,0.045672923,0.92898744,0.000053130803,0.00013661975,0.00024815885,0.021333141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013682513,0.004539397,0.00026473711,0.078295246,0.7991752,0.0000863256,0.00027803332,0.0002641329,0.115728684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946049,0.0006656367,0.0005147244,0.0009766105,0.0027105075,0.000527603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782753,0.003621804,0.0014362286,0.0014745763,0.011596483,0.0035954802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003752619,0.0017634336,0.001784771,0.0027667668,0.0029815785,0.008428095,0.0035279668,0.010762472,0.20518224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029039657,0.0008622988,0.0022438427,0.0012802338,0.0022101074,0.005340003,0.002338955,0.011385584,0.15972835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104995715,0.000008736461,0.00003099342,0.00008320612,0.000002691126,0.00006282698,0.000009337791,0.000010809613,0.000037026795,0.00029333445,0.9926847,0.006765803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000918641,0.000010399317,0.0001138599,0.00021752737,0.0000039130887,0.00015322138,0.000035466303,0.00002639279,0.00004977511,0.00041990765,0.9989532,0.0000071244117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018277394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030525867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20518224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026047481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037301888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.686403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917351143","doi":"","title":"Learning, Teaching & Practising Systemic Advocacy in Legal Clinics: A Conversation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Sociology; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.04070611120915998,"score_gpt":0.44216053812495226,"score_spread":0.4014544269157923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917351143","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021947468,0.0023088502,0.0023241378,0.94546306,0.00082983647,0.0000396376,0.000010798591,0.000020426369,0.027055824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8385113,0.00491504,0.0037015267,0.14166103,0.0018902008,0.00021603337,0.000013046843,0.00008765208,0.009004138],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9318611,0.05608994,0.0008131018,0.0018677537,0.0029564772,0.006411599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87057686,0.10286102,0.0036568346,0.0014665583,0.0036469542,0.017791796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.089473575,0.00060217356,0.0008060533,0.0022630126,0.028459953,0.035893977,0.0045892824,0.033581022,0.012290113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07275813,0.0009010728,0.000657832,0.0018129236,0.0715067,0.03681663,0.020273706,0.035437025,0.0011016042],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006378418,0.0004449129,0.002424631,0.00040553612,0.00001490336,0.0004950081,0.5503903,0.00021308914,0.00037993005,0.35981688,0.036750987,0.04860009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007514382,0.00012913263,0.001603835,0.0014145602,0.00001463776,0.0003295917,0.6755793,0.00053859636,0.00035805037,0.12448503,0.195407,0.00006506524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013599072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020726915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089473575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019067945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043942902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47318715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917477694","doi":"10.29242/lawstats.2007-2008","title":"ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 2007-2008","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ARL academic law and medical library statistics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Academic library; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.024236059519532574,"score_gpt":0.33584547979302926,"score_spread":0.3116094202734967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917477694","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018451468,0.005029882,0.0011869469,0.006849955,0.0017722338,0.0001987397,0.759937,0.0029822516,0.2201978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010588995,0.007134697,0.0028477358,0.0025997094,0.0011728765,0.00037331696,0.61075854,0.0009661685,0.36355796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950498,0.00025704148,0.00030056923,0.00025194703,0.0038100341,0.00033058264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98068774,0.002337141,0.0018322477,0.00063781673,0.013839404,0.0006655637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025671597,0.0008164474,0.00063962775,0.010908063,0.0011013089,0.0039113127,0.0016280597,0.00095944834,0.044669695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014633192,0.0006121434,0.00036653082,0.024197964,0.000438928,0.0020258336,0.0008257456,0.0016592962,0.054114096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047210083,0.0000037637117,0.00030228868,0.000036558846,0.0000014749396,0.000002799814,0.000011691453,0.00004666268,0.0000067595083,0.0007482894,0.99234456,0.006490357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000635724,0.000005668333,0.008458935,0.00011181564,0.0000046868645,0.000020372892,0.0000509039,0.00018360556,0.00008458031,0.00040950617,0.9906499,0.000013716077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4171877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52573436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4171877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012635141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022546262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8295188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918006290","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Lexis Library: How to use Lexis Library: Lexis Library - non-UK jurisdictions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Legislation; Library science; Law library; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06800933960480272,"score_gpt":0.3541410719504015,"score_spread":0.2861317323455988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918006290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036098398,0.0011223751,0.0007794053,0.004117056,0.0005443825,0.0002092053,0.021427225,0.008241355,0.963198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048144134,0.0024969976,0.0016097486,0.0022379034,0.00027952023,0.00055172545,0.017897723,0.00807729,0.9620347],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973302,0.00043523713,0.00032844587,0.00024171032,0.0013377542,0.00032662542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906103,0.0026006114,0.0004666136,0.0012636533,0.004006189,0.0010526025],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002354523,0.0011149665,0.0012753997,0.0054655178,0.002951984,0.013174597,0.0017754971,0.0045418176,0.73655945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021524202,0.0010829866,0.000699013,0.0095206285,0.002208289,0.011366821,0.005412131,0.003441463,0.7161917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013407377,0.000013276311,0.000116589516,0.00021511933,0.000002102373,0.00003878643,0.00015490342,0.00002605774,0.000053756754,0.0061946036,0.9671467,0.026024671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067387127,0.000004496941,0.00027851723,0.00022290708,0.0000013929083,0.000029822275,0.00017883778,0.000029120889,0.00014912631,0.0017916905,0.99729604,0.000011296494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029452747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041554708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73655945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063834405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012020838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37576592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918008470","doi":"10.29242/lawstats.2020","title":"ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 2020","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ARL academic law and medical library statistics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Library science; Academic library; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.024121140067447918,"score_gpt":0.3357921110227385,"score_spread":0.31167097095529056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918008470","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00069178734,0.0031886129,0.0019143167,0.005229763,0.0025650123,0.00017242327,0.6989877,0.005864041,0.28138632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035049866,0.0046456275,0.0037174537,0.0029071555,0.0012725003,0.000420268,0.5574685,0.0021414105,0.42392218],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957866,0.0003146267,0.0003048891,0.00023486109,0.0030555408,0.00030349314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836632,0.0024555896,0.0011903509,0.0009078723,0.01088783,0.0008951158],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025617077,0.0012319864,0.0007423759,0.00891298,0.0011138635,0.0053159986,0.0011351433,0.0009528193,0.121769965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017764201,0.00081229734,0.00055197097,0.021315515,0.0003815277,0.0027357892,0.0012386794,0.00200593,0.23579171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040962827,0.0000030741128,0.000118070646,0.000023251127,9.0915853e-7,0.0000021513265,0.000005036419,0.000035296227,0.0000066605626,0.0005270057,0.9902491,0.009025279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003883116,0.0000040018344,0.0015489039,0.00007953534,0.0000016266404,0.000011190621,0.000017529677,0.00009291895,0.00003298719,0.000423793,0.99777573,0.0000079525435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16032079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16935709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00562427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016276216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4073611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918030793","doi":"10.29242/lawstats.2011-2012","title":"ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 2011-2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ARL academic law and medical library statistics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Library science; Academic library; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02644343558490157,"score_gpt":0.3288888503161185,"score_spread":0.3024454147312169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918030793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011369785,0.01828572,0.0023155482,0.015718564,0.004752565,0.00024689382,0.47203928,0.0066238646,0.4788806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073097125,0.021327144,0.002959437,0.004230906,0.0028524308,0.0004280115,0.37754276,0.0019323219,0.5814172],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531686,0.00022173609,0.00026825414,0.00026400053,0.0036775954,0.0002515927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98764277,0.0018371157,0.0011683857,0.0005707569,0.008122918,0.0006579479],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002470299,0.0009815538,0.00075410306,0.013923509,0.0012926026,0.0057388297,0.0014151521,0.0013050877,0.08485506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015557825,0.00069989887,0.0004835542,0.032716807,0.00057959324,0.0034990783,0.0012704234,0.002145742,0.11926243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033556455,0.000003643248,0.00012520861,0.00004630771,9.781573e-7,0.000002729281,0.000013605058,0.00004719705,0.00000817318,0.001167524,0.985193,0.013388391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002436328,0.0000026195628,0.0018241557,0.00014435331,0.0000015355402,0.000014636019,0.000026732618,0.000088374894,0.00003975452,0.000580182,0.99726653,0.000008735184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1489463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19421871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9860765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011388994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018050846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29615867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918245904","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of a Mixed Methods Study in Work-Integrated Learning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Tshwane University of Technology; University of Waterloo; University of Surrey; Curtin University of Technology; Griffith University; University of Cincinnati; Deakin University; University of South Africa; University of Wollongong; Michigan State University; Flinders University; University of New England; Massey University; Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand; Southern Cross University; Queensland University of Technology; University of Waikato; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Multimethodology; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Research design; Conceptual framework; Management science; Computer science; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Pedagogy; Social science","score_opus":0.22022480064917296,"score_gpt":0.530850877902698,"score_spread":0.3106260772535251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918245904","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065439194,0.081862755,0.6800606,0.093579024,0.0069079497,0.012528899,0.00034399578,0.00040714652,0.058870465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21370369,0.019951541,0.72287303,0.019826056,0.001821324,0.01729552,0.00016060258,0.0003501861,0.0040180753],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.48992988,0.4488953,0.01447781,0.015739078,0.029177837,0.0017800318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4932014,0.3990747,0.011153602,0.043013733,0.045575358,0.007981142],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.36709502,0.00093946356,0.0019387245,0.009981045,0.00696556,0.018607428,0.0054004802,0.0051290696,0.0028603885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26950622,0.001645832,0.001692944,0.008595464,0.02486001,0.01841655,0.017170511,0.009087703,0.00067066395],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030375394,0.0008675712,0.012359746,0.007557757,0.00036443854,0.00034809843,0.08074613,0.0010078495,0.0015061634,0.40897956,0.0042137704,0.4817451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046739023,0.002438173,0.009569138,0.033839557,0.00039985398,0.0015867399,0.055950675,0.004501175,0.00430202,0.23506975,0.6514991,0.00037634594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069638714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008780797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36709502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023226233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033360858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78048456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919054898","doi":"10.7202/1056295ar","title":"Le droit moral de l’auteur au Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Auteur theory; Philosophy; Sociology; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.01938942912338517,"score_gpt":0.27457656322370827,"score_spread":0.2551871341003231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919054898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21803151,0.0053804233,0.0026580724,0.03670192,0.00024429453,0.00006916366,0.00037901034,0.00005897928,0.7364766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9144728,0.0028540993,0.00084693625,0.0032377813,0.000048102724,0.000024356219,0.000107250286,0.000024257124,0.07838444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957125,0.00048721675,0.00007467447,0.00028126943,0.0015165074,0.001927826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968593,0.0006209084,0.00023690771,0.00015674332,0.0012164103,0.00090973516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017748213,0.00026833056,0.00036729514,0.0013176504,0.015948514,0.0075687408,0.00092933094,0.0017522125,0.009485682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004556689,0.00022080017,0.0003740166,0.0013543345,0.01069791,0.0015868025,0.0032047462,0.0036677034,0.0005235251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006025626,0.000044206347,0.01580002,0.00011839464,0.000029570081,0.00050241506,0.043727014,0.00080366817,0.0007835949,0.8687966,0.021622434,0.047711793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035675504,0.00005716086,0.09245703,0.001238495,0.00006233143,0.00038302844,0.053356387,0.000982287,0.0010900919,0.060896218,0.78930163,0.00013962266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9728095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9818044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055876624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055876624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12784435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40541518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919390937","doi":"","title":"Where Do Mediators (and Mediation) Fit in the Regulatory Scheme Governing Lawyers? Unexplored and Unintended Consequences of Treating Mediators as Courts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Unintended consequences; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05483627906673601,"score_gpt":0.33921810793198404,"score_spread":0.28438182886524804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919390937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31675377,0.015409756,0.057393715,0.26782498,0.00093284884,0.000483091,0.00009721675,0.00015841235,0.34094614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97284216,0.00185831,0.0054059974,0.01054494,0.000115803276,0.00012567342,0.000015509326,0.000058529688,0.009033088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93833405,0.039605767,0.0014566592,0.0046597268,0.0059763277,0.009967502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797157,0.009881824,0.0033069546,0.0025170802,0.0024977277,0.002080767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040395483,0.00039141905,0.0011375806,0.0021905964,0.01556052,0.028913664,0.0036127577,0.011468592,0.006820595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048836578,0.0011782213,0.0010459931,0.0022923825,0.041730464,0.03516293,0.011591564,0.010667784,0.0011559014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045126137,0.00006825856,0.004958995,0.000116253985,0.000031190244,0.00044161602,0.048899926,0.00029161992,0.00049910106,0.9264513,0.0018354836,0.01636118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015813543,0.00023789727,0.01712303,0.0020850291,0.00016046433,0.00083876355,0.16650167,0.0021378568,0.0021423306,0.63656944,0.17181425,0.00023116273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028162114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036048125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040395483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011639696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020644495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21363431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920400168","doi":"","title":"CANADA’S LEGAL PROFESSION: SELF-REGULATING IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Public interest; Privilege (computing); Law; Political science; Value (mathematics); Legal ethics; Legislature; State (computer science); Self-interest; Sociology","score_opus":0.16847896868102122,"score_gpt":0.40049127442613547,"score_spread":0.23201230574511425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920400168","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06640249,0.006008647,0.0036406368,0.67888594,0.0012709502,0.000053027154,0.00013900583,0.000088881134,0.24351043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8272028,0.0042430316,0.002388414,0.09087614,0.00045215298,0.000036739497,0.00008618108,0.00006896058,0.07464564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99204355,0.000806439,0.00009468708,0.0006962847,0.002734462,0.0036245347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99363214,0.00096270343,0.00036441893,0.00021766467,0.001925876,0.0028972058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035625987,0.0002828435,0.00036761918,0.0011663941,0.0275615,0.014919891,0.0021385858,0.0076893033,0.0077248258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009053904,0.00034593965,0.00056281156,0.0015466352,0.02986045,0.0049388874,0.0043773195,0.010365642,0.0008122157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021443706,0.00003363529,0.0036769565,0.000068521695,0.0000109523835,0.0004154365,0.024161045,0.00019247997,0.00038755138,0.8880418,0.058894716,0.024095468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040945568,0.000038098155,0.017410288,0.00054313097,0.000037395883,0.00030958772,0.05399607,0.0012744379,0.0006526534,0.110416435,0.8151205,0.00016042814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9861951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99190795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86603063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13396937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32606286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9720203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920839095","doi":"","title":"AM I MY PARTNER’S KEEPER? THE DUTY TO REPORT A COLLEAGUE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Obligation; Duty; Law; Misconduct; Competence (human resources); Legal ethics; Political science; Professional conduct; Ethical code; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.1834431340006346,"score_gpt":0.44039089624611255,"score_spread":0.25694776224547794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920839095","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0103645325,0.013536922,0.0020517246,0.6108026,0.010514701,0.00012385906,0.00041612634,0.00012162373,0.35206795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1976942,0.018737009,0.0014989153,0.17900881,0.002582066,0.00009309271,0.00028026907,0.00011267045,0.59999293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99497885,0.0014684378,0.00015382134,0.00048084414,0.0018155724,0.001102406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99084115,0.0017970256,0.00082390854,0.00041448406,0.0032165442,0.002906923],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041751484,0.00018464595,0.00027784257,0.0007064046,0.0076873894,0.0036954524,0.0012040236,0.0027804475,0.028581765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021522988,0.000242122,0.00023117781,0.000879372,0.0031157667,0.002881103,0.0018775852,0.003951603,0.008558031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001685318,0.000015733569,0.0030408355,0.00013908968,0.000007836597,0.0005650371,0.0113726165,0.000021250196,0.00026915295,0.029930932,0.9107183,0.0439023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033005185,0.000011912371,0.0021421155,0.00021256451,0.0000047969534,0.0003528121,0.00908141,0.00002050016,0.0000885403,0.0010306516,0.98703706,0.000014400985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42420036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6281714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99721956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01165094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02581132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84346247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921482455","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500006053","title":"Cultural Competence and the Legal Profession: An Annotated Bibliography of Materials Published Between 2000 and 2011","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Core competency; Competence (human resources); Cultural competence; Legal profession; Sociology; Psychology; Public relations; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering ethics; Political science; Linguistics; Social psychology; Engineering; Business; Marketing; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04336920101461978,"score_gpt":0.36163975756481936,"score_spread":0.3182705565501996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921482455","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008289307,0.8123589,0.0010202461,0.006285752,0.0048118136,0.0001691742,0.013730059,0.00011189861,0.1532228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032000486,0.9039533,0.002467933,0.0024513982,0.0017937617,0.00040338628,0.012208565,0.00017570662,0.044545572],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831474,0.00041408712,0.00035561272,0.00015787821,0.0006382638,0.00011941426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98719263,0.009485773,0.00090590393,0.00025483675,0.0019045145,0.0002563837],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016126919,0.0008224381,0.0008521833,0.040464215,0.0026225294,0.004555152,0.00062235916,0.0013515166,0.022213535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010363397,0.00039726292,0.00033477772,0.06642699,0.0015483268,0.0041108876,0.001623181,0.0011207984,0.0037831762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106717125,0.000072563314,0.0019290787,0.034847256,0.0000400037,0.0006448553,0.024197437,0.00031759316,0.0006328368,0.016962815,0.41221595,0.50803286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036272563,0.00001250792,0.0075824587,0.031748615,0.000021706515,0.0002073882,0.005404421,0.000020952477,0.00011785067,0.00069049874,0.95417285,0.000017065104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023882603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039565045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9595358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035264147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007915544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07431173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921538605","doi":"","title":"BEYOND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST TO THE DUTY OF LOYALTY:FROM MARTIN V. GRAY TO R. V. NEIL","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Loyalty; Ambivalence; Supreme court; Gray (unit); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08474684672615154,"score_gpt":0.3647161061434266,"score_spread":0.279969259417275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921538605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047003344,0.03138848,0.0020747057,0.5245806,0.0019397313,0.00008074814,0.00018278351,0.000050635623,0.392699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71428853,0.01005428,0.00095328316,0.22196944,0.0011486717,0.000052376356,0.00007627782,0.00005981339,0.051397342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871674,0.002276152,0.0003019306,0.0010304609,0.004970918,0.004253117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988032,0.005686593,0.0005600422,0.0003561597,0.003519294,0.0018458089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00851745,0.000321965,0.00063443376,0.0019421469,0.015361828,0.011746854,0.002934472,0.0135192145,0.0032863985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02540685,0.00046526385,0.00062031945,0.001773883,0.021183131,0.004867311,0.003655092,0.016640333,0.0003815146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003325881,0.000019403837,0.0014644082,0.00010991136,0.000013959143,0.00037395867,0.009063602,0.00013738067,0.00017338198,0.9159072,0.054962445,0.01774112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007512311,0.00006896781,0.014099075,0.0014163045,0.00015142268,0.0004051369,0.014515444,0.0006171747,0.0008598209,0.20923755,0.75833154,0.00022250603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9169647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9625129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08303529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059779815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11899858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43373495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921675498","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v3i0.430","title":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal Volume 3","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.06368009170082004,"score_gpt":0.40575597411013314,"score_spread":0.3420758824093131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921675498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02235862,0.018085403,0.00096587255,0.12268865,0.1172542,0.00030477732,0.00050648174,0.00069864024,0.7171373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05789623,0.009598934,0.00079157867,0.016462166,0.05556458,0.00009426497,0.0004895472,0.00032065314,0.8587821],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793917,0.0002500055,0.00009829959,0.0001474979,0.0011399272,0.00042508336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989814,0.00083030475,0.0003345313,0.00037082616,0.0022700613,0.006380281],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021436287,0.00072508724,0.0005963299,0.0036783165,0.0042257267,0.0072148885,0.0009041628,0.0043528653,0.2842893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007581947,0.00039260034,0.00047347663,0.0016562854,0.0019881176,0.002621284,0.005086592,0.0034189196,0.062447898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003317818,0.0005291768,0.002631204,0.0002506118,0.000007508813,0.00032062727,0.0003312734,0.000063602514,0.00074347854,0.006694061,0.89842224,0.08997295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023096562,0.00008384048,0.007641615,0.000554858,0.000010638353,0.00056450104,0.00090864714,0.00012608893,0.00030317137,0.002551192,0.98721945,0.000012858801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023415622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012436218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7157107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027938108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073982193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9510425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921677101","doi":"10.29173/mlj1082","title":"Public Inquiries’ Terms of Reference: Lessons from the Past – And for the Future","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1870536642896508,"score_gpt":0.40757396452527367,"score_spread":0.22052030023562286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921677101","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00079429714,0.008121754,0.0042602457,0.9550538,0.0041464497,0.000045545054,0.00008784767,0.00009061136,0.027399356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21738526,0.037188996,0.034207046,0.6227378,0.02653104,0.0010876228,0.0008002386,0.0015475939,0.058514424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6750158,0.19687712,0.028247258,0.011762186,0.07288243,0.015215214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.31378722,0.39598134,0.021939311,0.06791663,0.174175,0.026200501],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.34498465,0.0011432633,0.0040474855,0.0085798055,0.025898306,0.07657243,0.017397456,0.05199581,0.028429197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5529928,0.0023117582,0.0021313073,0.012370745,0.08242469,0.093616724,0.023673352,0.06017762,0.009754598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046609286,0.000095802185,0.00072971964,0.00043980958,0.00002759771,0.00020627385,0.0171055,0.00018540786,0.00009089687,0.6464879,0.2883925,0.04619187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049837585,0.000019326279,0.00081535545,0.0027339873,0.00003061843,0.00026125682,0.019548655,0.0005027172,0.00019480688,0.36120915,0.6144739,0.00016043645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09227577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089710474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34498465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04471365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14838853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8077506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921759853","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500011562","title":"IALL 2012 Conference report: The 31 <sup>st</sup> Annual Course on International Law and Legal Information Toronto, Canada, 30 September - 4 October, 2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Course (navigation); Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.013918361883238008,"score_gpt":0.3186100650234458,"score_spread":0.30469170314020777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921759853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004969701,0.008948308,0.002480319,0.104295254,0.04148035,0.0010019131,0.032423988,0.0022652266,0.80213505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007754046,0.0021508269,0.0008551911,0.0018858205,0.0019174955,0.00019891479,0.007629093,0.00040973627,0.97719896],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973701,0.0002312347,0.000068859656,0.00022630552,0.001388487,0.0007150509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928676,0.00039167103,0.00019022763,0.00022868019,0.003323104,0.002998779],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048352345,0.0010286248,0.0007767588,0.002250503,0.004350609,0.009675346,0.0014469747,0.0037376035,0.34314165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051075662,0.00045439624,0.0006321456,0.0021673702,0.0008503182,0.0029603648,0.003033115,0.00368912,0.15430684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001803068,0.000022888145,0.00013450313,0.000034128454,8.360032e-7,0.000013694117,0.00004166137,0.000024600447,0.000073545554,0.00036557787,0.9942368,0.005033527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000080428235,0.000016999611,0.0021177127,0.00011501497,0.00000263355,0.000019341853,0.00035852334,0.00008958742,0.00024094532,0.0001660229,0.99685377,0.000011458421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1509232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33011356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8490768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009889899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023909742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93692875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921801185","doi":"","title":"The Student as Inadvertent Employee in Work-Integrated Learning: A Risk Assessment by University Lawyers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Tshwane University of Technology; University of Waterloo; University of Surrey; Curtin University of Technology; Griffith University; University of Cincinnati; Deakin University; University of South Africa; University of Wollongong; Michigan State University; Flinders University; University of New England; Massey University; Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand; Southern Cross University; Queensland University of Technology; University of Waikato; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Work (physics); Unintended consequences; Scholarship; Public relations; Payment; Vocational education; EXPOSE; Business; Legal advice; Sociology; Political science; Law; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.11732486260597759,"score_gpt":0.47363719681928323,"score_spread":0.35631233421330566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921801185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841046,0.0003257531,0.0012421141,0.008562368,0.00003848747,0.00005763345,0.0000064744268,0.000013641941,0.0056489515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962792,0.000353615,0.0008887384,0.0008009607,0.0000206887,0.00002595229,0.0000046947007,0.00000800665,0.0016181718],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9695469,0.01871556,0.0011943992,0.0009907256,0.0062477994,0.0033045718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9584327,0.021772714,0.0087326635,0.0014430849,0.005148514,0.0044704154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025132313,0.00039305008,0.0006164473,0.0019940482,0.01793573,0.012374031,0.0023606217,0.0053096786,0.00329315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070522845,0.0007170465,0.0005644393,0.001516342,0.0075293183,0.007913002,0.013583703,0.0074830493,0.0005092346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008034057,0.0010256472,0.110165246,0.000101054604,0.000026859825,0.006323631,0.8164227,0.0002782331,0.00065779156,0.008423586,0.0039152666,0.052579705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010063645,0.00034361586,0.015221364,0.00030975387,0.000024531662,0.0032577233,0.96597344,0.0010491266,0.00045277126,0.0023820775,0.010918642,0.000056926314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005210945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011610044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025132313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055079996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008281704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13291395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921948824","doi":"","title":"LAWYERS MEET THE SOCIAL CONTEXT: UNDERSTANDING CULTURAL COMPETENCE","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural competence; Competence (human resources); Social justice; Psychology; Cultural diversity; Cultural values; Social psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Social science; Law; Criminology","score_opus":0.1612604705285253,"score_gpt":0.4026962245734172,"score_spread":0.2414357540448919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921948824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9239653,0.001652932,0.0005155843,0.016932424,0.000033153385,0.000033988024,0.00005365568,0.000007636202,0.056805324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99783474,0.0007255439,0.00014187093,0.00041762355,0.0000064100805,0.000004794889,0.00001595984,0.000002625481,0.00085042114],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954454,0.0013705032,0.00009321834,0.00029901217,0.0013119573,0.0014799233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992804,0.0017290508,0.0012792785,0.00015013237,0.0018390446,0.0021985401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033577909,0.00024333305,0.00039587563,0.0041715633,0.016875613,0.009057527,0.001538259,0.0013443475,0.0024073445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012813829,0.00026790932,0.00021583209,0.0033090932,0.017510073,0.0042775115,0.0056720967,0.002349622,0.000117788055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020010797,0.00008943379,0.16335154,0.00013514975,0.00004329176,0.00066249183,0.7390308,0.00043140256,0.00039927772,0.045325376,0.0028889426,0.047622327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067320657,0.00002543443,0.24862275,0.00028009122,0.000035294262,0.00011131435,0.71429574,0.00048306014,0.00013826594,0.007754449,0.0282081,0.0000387642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9762379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98914427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06645742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10147022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4821846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922143494","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5788","title":"Advocacy in Non-Adversarial Family Law: A Recommendation for Revision to the Model Code","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Negotiation; Family law; Code (set theory); Law; Political science; Dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12062335744431228,"score_gpt":0.45620860557214055,"score_spread":0.33558524812782825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922143494","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027060194,0.00469166,0.009223219,0.9483694,0.0093810335,0.00046235343,0.000080311926,0.00023855006,0.02484741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09589474,0.015010406,0.1489831,0.67478156,0.009933787,0.0035023196,0.0006170999,0.00051403226,0.05076289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9196621,0.033222705,0.008309476,0.0041875173,0.028733676,0.0058845226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70145315,0.13919842,0.012197207,0.026348818,0.09932127,0.021481171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0956605,0.0009414451,0.0018087066,0.0036729241,0.009441639,0.019842029,0.010841503,0.033166036,0.011314085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20875879,0.0008674196,0.0033547923,0.004162317,0.040658094,0.030395266,0.010735958,0.04693011,0.004831778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007655018,0.0004095887,0.0024070605,0.0009059027,0.000027509252,0.00033124787,0.012261465,0.0005368632,0.00027687845,0.52646965,0.34507757,0.11121978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011961304,0.0001431145,0.0027496703,0.005834408,0.000057819194,0.00040934604,0.011737439,0.0009832154,0.00032134564,0.1453425,0.8320774,0.00022417866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16421787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2261327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16421787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024981463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15512203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5059071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922836245","doi":"","title":"Perceptions and Conceptions of Feedback: Differences between Levels of Study in a School of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Law; Psychology; Mathematics education; Political science","score_opus":0.1811049844193835,"score_gpt":0.41525042425208486,"score_spread":0.23414543983270136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922836245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955609,0.00037552475,0.00020143893,0.0007168386,0.000014900299,0.000030912495,0.000025977193,0.000006477733,0.0030671074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889094,0.0001534645,0.000096672804,0.00019119779,0.000007748718,0.00002675523,0.000024736613,0.0000064755004,0.0006019318],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98243743,0.0075761513,0.0012586439,0.001060844,0.005046973,0.0026198952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94445723,0.025197895,0.009482621,0.0013429197,0.008079271,0.011439947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019919269,0.0003387302,0.0007781394,0.0072153057,0.006331273,0.01224256,0.001699774,0.0016025946,0.0048978976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06669131,0.000797754,0.00069670787,0.0030806065,0.008782449,0.0076923566,0.010532559,0.003103644,0.0006754182],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011891381,0.00032483647,0.2604736,0.00005853983,0.00002141301,0.00020355196,0.7267872,0.000032458393,0.00043650664,0.0017154925,0.00053221657,0.009295207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009827412,0.00022525623,0.21345675,0.00014551973,0.000007917307,0.00020758148,0.7814029,0.00019242325,0.00012481233,0.0009786196,0.0032103772,0.000038079696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017515201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019966016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019919269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006538528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051466157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105344355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927339976","doi":"","title":"Online struggles for professional jurisdiction and cultural authority: an analysis of professional association websites in Ontario","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Horizontes (Ponce)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Professional association; Association (psychology); Public relations; Political science; Law; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.05898316169005656,"score_gpt":0.3943387375544788,"score_spread":0.3353555758644222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927339976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773637,0.00016702365,0.00007559787,0.001638611,0.000007740844,0.00003456475,0.00010431938,0.000005041437,0.020603465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99341595,0.00022206357,0.00009596687,0.00016158642,0.000005503605,0.00001756132,0.00006466431,0.000011785538,0.0060050846],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949126,0.0009944405,0.00020888505,0.0003101563,0.0017633209,0.0018106144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779773,0.0072676083,0.0034701922,0.0006462678,0.0051556663,0.005482874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030152518,0.000119786215,0.00037334012,0.0031011426,0.019870594,0.008136853,0.00149767,0.0013559652,0.0071087093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01697716,0.00048922555,0.0002772612,0.008562843,0.0076131793,0.0033506847,0.005358844,0.001570404,0.00042634967],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012858008,0.0001435731,0.25140008,0.00008776781,0.000020211293,0.0010198787,0.70743376,0.00012264951,0.00033890072,0.013184278,0.004700652,0.021419706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008107354,0.000023360619,0.26478335,0.0000964873,0.000012498577,0.00012456828,0.7076985,0.00018371938,0.000090024274,0.0005492788,0.026410865,0.000019292325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96287507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067034304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067034304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08838982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4863702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2929520862","doi":"10.11575/prism/32759","title":"Summary Legal Advice Services in Alberta: Survey Results from the First Two Years of Data Collection","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Data collection; Computer science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.03926256618920762,"score_gpt":0.3019631827016875,"score_spread":0.2627006165124799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2929520862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865079,0.0003924238,0.00018931403,0.00046777359,0.000012038657,0.00036419823,0.007356901,0.000032624775,0.00467692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98167866,0.00074803695,0.0010026478,0.00034896485,0.000011648345,0.00042494014,0.010512737,0.000014913031,0.0052573886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450976,0.0006048916,0.00034755352,0.00029698104,0.0033617672,0.0008790392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98702973,0.00207582,0.002540016,0.0003185441,0.006439624,0.0015962956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059103826,0.0003383655,0.0003987987,0.0031998937,0.0017355557,0.0020591954,0.0016016092,0.00062960526,0.001780904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014504042,0.00048680007,0.00049538974,0.0069746855,0.0008897027,0.0008182941,0.001914048,0.0011434719,0.00043874077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013018987,0.00022541483,0.9638976,0.00013110742,0.000040928306,0.000120346616,0.008432324,0.0002990308,0.00017647547,0.0001357625,0.0031616376,0.023249192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000507358,0.0000455375,0.993117,0.000028562727,0.000007199453,0.000013572141,0.005439805,0.00012835351,0.000050163962,0.000009055889,0.0011475645,0.000008113499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95888764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97125286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041112363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021124195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030284176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1532675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2929850989","doi":"10.3138/tric.39.1.90","title":"Liberal Education, Entrepreneurship, and the Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theatre Research in Canada","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal arts education; Liberal education; Institution; Entrepreneurship; Political science; Higher education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.08127109074639963,"score_gpt":0.44072164726257546,"score_spread":0.35945055651617586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2929850989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078233704,0.0085417265,0.0024340996,0.18351403,0.00048537165,0.000057147925,0.000058111797,0.000042682874,0.7266332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398007,0.0032300993,0.00069622486,0.0075102886,0.00011539433,0.00002529072,0.000020321162,0.000017271528,0.048584428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994062,0.0016946539,0.000089821246,0.00033205526,0.0013935735,0.0024279184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99212027,0.0027477918,0.0004912678,0.0003733119,0.0009689477,0.0032983941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035869428,0.0002405206,0.00035170306,0.0011532013,0.019816598,0.014958232,0.0010698946,0.0028570069,0.0066363956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073586265,0.00016874606,0.00020244016,0.0026257208,0.0747988,0.0034105335,0.005231218,0.005073207,0.0003824499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049914624,0.000015024976,0.0008864711,0.000014680297,0.0000011076467,0.00008996452,0.01015525,0.0000527819,0.000021250597,0.9752333,0.0065388316,0.006986354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023278095,0.00003477478,0.010635617,0.00042238287,0.0000059685112,0.00017981273,0.06492294,0.00041880802,0.0002381046,0.40593177,0.5171476,0.00003883679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81111956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87641114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81111956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057704523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12352008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41867757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935554223","doi":"10.11575/prism/36334","title":"Academic Integrity in Canada: An Annotated Bibliography","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Bibliography; Annotated bibliography; Library science; History; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02726953907363016,"score_gpt":0.28520820707052136,"score_spread":0.2579386679968912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935554223","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030082297,0.7894231,0.001890911,0.01700036,0.0053113783,0.0003932863,0.031002853,0.0003437892,0.15162615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020197906,0.92653286,0.005123641,0.003094557,0.000915661,0.0002496626,0.014361454,0.00025097295,0.02927329],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934881,0.0006074063,0.00083500927,0.0005043929,0.0038459105,0.0007193145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96483827,0.0058489037,0.0017324993,0.00061129755,0.025588667,0.0013802898],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040481947,0.001279726,0.0017738425,0.063685104,0.01399586,0.009231696,0.002890411,0.002170562,0.024956197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021578424,0.00059724425,0.0009441791,0.15189913,0.0043264194,0.0029454583,0.003056314,0.0018922131,0.004376339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059859867,0.000024113715,0.0021817912,0.023370069,0.000049716236,0.0005464874,0.005941472,0.000614628,0.0002990999,0.020336544,0.6181684,0.3284078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031290338,0.0000057093253,0.0038355463,0.0153655615,0.000055830635,0.00013956336,0.001917989,0.00005554359,0.00009027367,0.0007878403,0.9777068,0.00003616697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96837986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98121303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99782944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09750103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2961986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70742285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935613447","doi":"","title":"'Silly, Soft and Otherwise Suspect’: Doctoral education as risky business","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Research Online (Deakin University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Rigour; False accusation; Relation (database); Corporate governance; Political science; Misconduct; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Criminology; Management; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.0991315259408548,"score_gpt":0.4445885805701416,"score_spread":0.34545705462928683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935613447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40283412,0.0046073236,0.0071117627,0.20591488,0.00055574154,0.000056457426,0.000027639973,0.0000541737,0.37883782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845073,0.0008902114,0.00043802487,0.0043121683,0.00011045468,0.000021429001,0.0000047224353,0.000016493688,0.009699133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722064,0.020612624,0.0004637411,0.0013130544,0.0034406455,0.001963625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9409969,0.04154286,0.0074760574,0.0031702644,0.0026947283,0.004119201],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019937064,0.00020683522,0.00036733173,0.0019127349,0.016413145,0.020595258,0.00111934,0.008609298,0.006932313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051036704,0.00044343463,0.00032483015,0.0015317942,0.06819391,0.013911109,0.0146158,0.009479922,0.000598919],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003565787,0.000059243408,0.005845161,0.0000809726,0.000007793427,0.0006558558,0.18347068,0.00017307544,0.00030166042,0.77926314,0.008147543,0.021959208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031722597,0.00012986606,0.017234161,0.0010980333,0.000028453149,0.0011879926,0.3099064,0.0013450229,0.001674574,0.3710864,0.29615408,0.0001232969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073014023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012612544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98006296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009805436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010102334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10543853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293761694","doi":"","title":"Legal Argumentation and Evidence by Douglas Walton (review)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.021659329074499925,"score_gpt":0.31056474879870066,"score_spread":0.28890541972420075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293761694","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000050409155,0.96633184,0.00009162596,0.030226976,0.002655197,0.000010553805,0.000041292515,0.0000025837373,0.0005895173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022907283,0.9763071,0.0002932578,0.015299001,0.0040179216,0.000052518688,0.000060519298,0.000007293504,0.0016717224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99122614,0.004491387,0.0009417324,0.0006585251,0.0024169353,0.00026533107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9341168,0.048277054,0.0037048815,0.00079208903,0.011424443,0.0016847092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015509093,0.0013074484,0.0027896184,0.0121752955,0.0015844285,0.005550867,0.0016149,0.0061491816,0.005158784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06724645,0.0011855554,0.0008532794,0.013186195,0.004218882,0.005344919,0.0030871711,0.0045879865,0.0015364862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115753995,0.000017440127,0.00046932237,0.01784452,0.0002921793,0.00012059962,0.0006302598,0.00017837445,0.00006711445,0.0073824036,0.82799304,0.144889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013177437,0.000043481643,0.0028103837,0.05268231,0.0005886908,0.00039912853,0.00043957852,0.00009031069,0.00009706208,0.008125207,0.93452287,0.000069216534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047097262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12393112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047097262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009318188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025495749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09364629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941074681","doi":"","title":"TO BE OR NOT TO BE?: SOME LEGAL ETHICS FOR JUDICIAL LAW CLERKS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislation; Facilitator; Legal ethics; Principal (computer security); Practice of law; Political science; Judicial opinion; Legal profession; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.4333036997660276,"score_gpt":0.4785080265117015,"score_spread":0.04520432674567387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941074681","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019846652,0.014310526,0.006541634,0.82463706,0.0008980691,0.000054691733,0.000030303905,0.000024557752,0.1336565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8381792,0.008214919,0.0066810576,0.08836007,0.0010080446,0.00009880382,0.00002659695,0.0000711998,0.057360042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97959626,0.013022307,0.00042971835,0.00093527435,0.0026730376,0.003343407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857422,0.006496505,0.00065183867,0.00037908848,0.0032722352,0.0034580468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019786755,0.00045314876,0.00058600225,0.0013459054,0.026195707,0.017361455,0.0023058983,0.01393188,0.0043894015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021464085,0.0005207133,0.0004168671,0.0011185543,0.060356084,0.008603342,0.0042190123,0.015875863,0.000961544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009440752,0.000027576703,0.0005382304,0.000047647773,0.0000032026182,0.00033157028,0.03561104,0.00013357759,0.00009945377,0.9175517,0.03612983,0.009516777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023770752,0.000029374412,0.0019556347,0.0005921335,0.00000823044,0.00047625072,0.07155728,0.0006913391,0.00021718717,0.55733496,0.36703125,0.00008266574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3288261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4605527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3288261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041601967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058405604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6538242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941788659","doi":"","title":"Library: LAW Adjusting to Law School: School Life Balance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Balance (ability); Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03373473366637473,"score_gpt":0.34584544764065317,"score_spread":0.3121107139742784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941788659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3249595,0.004010372,0.0011381878,0.40146738,0.0018856542,0.00048311733,0.0020171707,0.0020613703,0.26197734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75609195,0.0038377743,0.004685217,0.04421746,0.0008092561,0.00038570445,0.0016064092,0.00046070683,0.18790548],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838483,0.00042655936,0.00006730843,0.0001031091,0.0004256493,0.0005925213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98620147,0.00091979094,0.00051000883,0.00017518192,0.001533632,0.010659906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002267622,0.00021041848,0.0005563685,0.0017821057,0.010763081,0.007308747,0.001681711,0.002918618,0.050335057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011878907,0.00031874803,0.00029382212,0.0017706073,0.0012507722,0.0032087716,0.0047702617,0.0033903248,0.007429543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015040919,0.0038540117,0.061874203,0.00024792255,0.000036074907,0.0008953802,0.01554828,0.00012569377,0.00055921014,0.0039323606,0.554737,0.3580394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018606884,0.0005845773,0.316391,0.00078120583,0.0001227768,0.00048154587,0.10118003,0.00031985145,0.0013351052,0.0052675824,0.5732535,0.00009681797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06684587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31578594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06684587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00827418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032340012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16838753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942740453","doi":"10.64628/aam.r9k7kfugn","title":"Why the Kavanaugh hearings were a show trial gone bad","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.10164630551253181,"score_gpt":0.41884051029091324,"score_spread":0.31719420477838145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942740453","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02901407,0.0028187116,0.002009051,0.81759167,0.016040396,0.00007750648,0.00032975452,0.00029595167,0.13182285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4319788,0.0017096336,0.0014805844,0.43644086,0.0040736157,0.00012609191,0.00019940283,0.0005908336,0.12340013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990397,0.002721819,0.00021468477,0.00091197214,0.0028055755,0.0029489992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98534966,0.006354315,0.0008571407,0.000937722,0.0038730332,0.0026281362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010427206,0.00041197668,0.0004113343,0.00081570446,0.011750264,0.011558766,0.0012363225,0.013099455,0.021202909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053203147,0.00057224324,0.00048868323,0.0006030299,0.010423162,0.006804756,0.0028627955,0.025211552,0.0075973584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011592857,0.000064404514,0.003361439,0.000060113707,0.000031670264,0.0007633793,0.0045467196,0.0001306302,0.00057406595,0.13468936,0.83410615,0.021556204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007953572,0.00009414542,0.0076159607,0.00042477078,0.000037669717,0.00048784856,0.014361879,0.0003816872,0.0013871137,0.065033324,0.9099601,0.00013596275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039493777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056231752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039493777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059975833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00939978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07852781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944527804","doi":"","title":"BOOK REVIEW - COMPTE RENDU - A REVIEW ESSAY: PROBING THE BLACK BOX - AMERICAN SOCIAL SCIENCE TACKLES JUDICIAL AGENDA SETTING BY THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05781270026438395,"score_gpt":0.38242304214531847,"score_spread":0.3246103418809345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944527804","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002817608,0.46843237,0.00024135456,0.42679155,0.06272371,0.00009760882,0.00040168737,0.000046266057,0.040983718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008865678,0.35664263,0.0008609987,0.5057187,0.045333114,0.0002293622,0.00032313514,0.00011445799,0.081911914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98771733,0.0018545899,0.0005195399,0.00074753194,0.00840988,0.0007512311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94755375,0.020709664,0.0017826773,0.00077554025,0.027453147,0.0017251872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012114192,0.00092527556,0.0025114133,0.008654391,0.006162929,0.01216221,0.0035968772,0.014074138,0.009570602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046757165,0.0009412778,0.0010292688,0.014269038,0.007769408,0.0036544811,0.0016907527,0.010334944,0.00368199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054777593,0.0000030563956,0.00004227658,0.00033053444,0.000011801814,0.000017802491,0.000053225674,0.000031183918,0.000024620069,0.0058637206,0.9858122,0.0078039947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014588728,0.0000056876083,0.0005793717,0.0019878494,0.000040377345,0.000029977064,0.00013813339,0.000040574905,0.000036704154,0.0042673056,0.99283534,0.00002405869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52969366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85504085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94756246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052437536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08124633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94615215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944577908","doi":"","title":"Fitness for Purpose: Mandatory Continuing Legal Ethics Education for Lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Legal profession; Law; Political science; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.06429586042986292,"score_gpt":0.4570667056379256,"score_spread":0.3927708452080627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944577908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22959508,0.0011167284,0.007932627,0.4794503,0.0013788808,0.00064546464,0.00008518187,0.00045176095,0.27934402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91564924,0.00021759867,0.008825321,0.041301258,0.00032006323,0.00017239989,0.000050028273,0.000032227726,0.033431876],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941109,0.0013646998,0.00021482438,0.00035304468,0.0019491094,0.002007455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96250176,0.013575462,0.002581839,0.0015767933,0.006935879,0.012828222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066425004,0.00018981204,0.00021625518,0.00077782583,0.007636079,0.004623082,0.001401852,0.008166187,0.010711591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04403647,0.00021150468,0.00033828616,0.00045632722,0.0047567235,0.0024095683,0.005064194,0.0046249917,0.0011547414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013957213,0.002247711,0.03640777,0.00048400095,0.000022961318,0.0018642658,0.048550256,0.00064480526,0.0045765094,0.27136853,0.21612321,0.41757038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028740888,0.00063452066,0.15833955,0.0015573595,0.00007140152,0.0023555043,0.040886544,0.0032384265,0.0048572137,0.10896331,0.67861927,0.00018948871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1089986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3851308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1089986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0106244655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068705395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21672833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945286097","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.6","title":"Challenges in Gendering Indigenous Legal Education: Insights from Professors Teaching about Indigenous Laws","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal education; Indigenous education; Political science; Sociology; Power (physics); Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.043032596854771434,"score_gpt":0.32752876234213324,"score_spread":0.2844961654873618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945286097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8715221,0.0037664187,0.0026041206,0.07532388,0.0004300575,0.00010348098,0.00005340468,0.000030602285,0.0461659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878493,0.0014085947,0.000418092,0.004124162,0.00007912045,0.000037848033,0.000009792679,0.000021153295,0.006051829],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97592807,0.014974156,0.00036578544,0.00089213584,0.0031631405,0.0046766847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9708538,0.017657315,0.0018900088,0.00045739874,0.002983701,0.006157676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01930791,0.00043334102,0.001029592,0.002098818,0.04077393,0.014343994,0.0028612455,0.003824667,0.004060261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022656849,0.00052967784,0.00042647266,0.002285148,0.03219078,0.0076430305,0.01317975,0.009799364,0.0004314686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000500612,0.000023805023,0.0011755405,0.000026315305,0.0000014713783,0.00031235136,0.99025625,0.000017082526,0.00013919245,0.005118226,0.00093569054,0.0019890876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001162717,0.000008491466,0.0003794929,0.000047224352,0.0000015534602,0.00007093611,0.9870122,0.000028043803,0.000060199593,0.0005464768,0.011838623,0.00000547654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14052096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25027388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85947907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025554428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042723954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27940607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945613255","doi":"10.3968/10960","title":"The Legal Professional Qualification Examination and Legal Education in China","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; China; Legal education; Political science; Professional development; Law; Pedagogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.022367735485083452,"score_gpt":0.4141184820290598,"score_spread":0.39175074654397635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945613255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78447217,0.012420303,0.0016420241,0.054993767,0.00055494957,0.000089048866,0.00037097718,0.0000409167,0.14541581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98548603,0.0019292317,0.0002654164,0.0012042943,0.00014018618,0.000017361546,0.00009826947,0.0000030996248,0.010856133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834573,0.00030706456,0.0000860681,0.00020295363,0.00037709126,0.0006810687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977458,0.00031987898,0.00045424447,0.00005608269,0.00035665178,0.0010673051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016566569,0.0001413306,0.00022746848,0.002144609,0.0024909487,0.0016971511,0.00043233344,0.0008462612,0.0065062516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040927683,0.00016669187,0.00023037818,0.0027948166,0.0035291824,0.0016852467,0.0018668772,0.0014884908,0.00023361357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007208424,0.00028718467,0.25218964,0.0003148817,0.000033226257,0.001749834,0.00874802,0.0013504014,0.00041124245,0.54349566,0.02619023,0.16515757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006496927,0.00015273101,0.8226934,0.00051425444,0.000030087918,0.00047385955,0.0043675145,0.0046590106,0.00029057232,0.044537887,0.12213178,0.000083956205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22515623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19601144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22515623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00823923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026468435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44769138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946089218","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.14","title":"Conceptualizing the Victim within Criminal Justice Processes in Common Law Tradition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Criminal justice; Theory of criminal justice; Criminology; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminal law; Law enforcement; Criminal justice ethics; Foundation (evidence); Law; Enforcement; Public interest; Sociology","score_opus":0.13898286173150043,"score_gpt":0.40916019662009884,"score_spread":0.2701773348885984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946089218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21107191,0.01838871,0.09163734,0.04822602,0.0005941952,0.00022583324,0.000040782525,0.00009734257,0.62971795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98023784,0.0037281953,0.0055045616,0.0019061937,0.0001786766,0.00010823309,0.000015213198,0.000028467079,0.008292622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918167,0.005446687,0.000202167,0.00058561086,0.0011615183,0.00078730105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971347,0.0017151192,0.00032323154,0.0002052307,0.0002954978,0.00032622245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061763013,0.0005467046,0.00054386765,0.0049330276,0.009815377,0.012317784,0.0022672336,0.005511482,0.0034499168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049076336,0.0002837976,0.000456538,0.0033098685,0.09051316,0.016268156,0.010228345,0.005025881,0.0002959684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021004957,0.000015968937,0.0002769885,0.000023837638,0.0000017882118,0.000087381675,0.049784213,0.000079811565,0.00004160896,0.9476007,0.00021239328,0.0018732552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009725161,0.000043515207,0.0011593177,0.0005727174,0.000014422053,0.000429119,0.10012495,0.0007412355,0.00015479416,0.8191069,0.07761586,0.00002737574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01114764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008347099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012317784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008876757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0081059085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06440568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946153400","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v26i1.825","title":"Supervision in the Clinic Setting: what we Really Want Students to Learn","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Compliance (psychology); Law; Economic Justice; Set (abstract data type); Legal education; Legal service; Legal profession; Service (business); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08194282851720693,"score_gpt":0.5537119594487657,"score_spread":0.4717691309315588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946153400","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024396364,0.01937713,0.00493265,0.908187,0.023126347,0.00032453582,0.00012892103,0.00069480366,0.018832235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2475772,0.04466709,0.031308964,0.6023203,0.026763992,0.0015267314,0.0004494772,0.0006710079,0.044715222],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866534,0.0054480685,0.0004670179,0.0008793776,0.0036164436,0.0029357406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91616786,0.0070438213,0.003121155,0.0022332966,0.010902211,0.060531646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012651713,0.001296455,0.001881105,0.001105135,0.008143968,0.014752145,0.0038274222,0.0140924435,0.010981908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034550585,0.00068248465,0.0009978922,0.0008518476,0.00952621,0.017931504,0.013081487,0.021130415,0.008587486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010093501,0.0020232422,0.011591161,0.0019880875,0.000035577832,0.00183801,0.049609404,0.00026572047,0.0010846818,0.0056261206,0.6936284,0.2322087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014584674,0.0017762366,0.009423649,0.005526677,0.000041156873,0.0057042525,0.20637129,0.0004958943,0.001055455,0.027822906,0.7413809,0.00025581353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026096548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006577799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014752145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037953644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017338123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06690943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946164901","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v49i2.46292","title":"Trinity Western University’s Law School: Quo Vadis?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0639360732605877,"score_gpt":0.40598376862321744,"score_spread":0.34204769536262974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946164901","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024937147,0.0066030915,0.0014858054,0.56477463,0.00816474,0.00004359605,0.00021207493,0.0001589633,0.39361995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4592182,0.0024854222,0.0016120665,0.13853773,0.0013532544,0.00008345778,0.000116565236,0.00014502324,0.39644828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619883,0.0007193044,0.00011807136,0.0005304002,0.00099515,0.0014382582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99692935,0.00046156681,0.0001614033,0.00016938019,0.0009505125,0.0013277932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00255972,0.0002020252,0.00031098444,0.0006806938,0.015563493,0.009180412,0.0009685599,0.0045413864,0.016360467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008584584,0.0003369573,0.00019213185,0.0010244523,0.011854231,0.0031849716,0.0028494245,0.007110577,0.0015926681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032208256,0.000014817031,0.001723005,0.00008158147,0.000007834552,0.00023043403,0.012137788,0.000050001476,0.0002140812,0.7380001,0.22919151,0.018316628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010861096,0.000017409779,0.002430995,0.00022168946,0.000009676323,0.00007126268,0.008742001,0.00008165601,0.00018406997,0.01945667,0.9687318,0.00004185978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67760736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8681365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9698251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030174939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054835033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6485826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946874170","doi":"10.7202/1058600ar","title":"L’enseignement du droit d’auteur dans les États de tradition juridique de common law","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02406521490584773,"score_gpt":0.2870249646225513,"score_spread":0.26295974971670355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946874170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15506499,0.015704006,0.018243501,0.067916825,0.0013710441,0.0001045382,0.00021840971,0.0000995642,0.7412771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7954128,0.0054697897,0.0032912958,0.005419853,0.00036284546,0.000060425875,0.00007506486,0.00008996898,0.18981797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98995507,0.0036688535,0.0003109755,0.0012869642,0.0033733968,0.0014048215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99115014,0.0044314335,0.0009960056,0.00084221066,0.0018002527,0.000780023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00681156,0.00032755057,0.00042537376,0.0018271488,0.014558397,0.012808462,0.0013408286,0.0056231045,0.013613694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014626772,0.00039574038,0.0003973218,0.0032789274,0.023545675,0.009243718,0.004998733,0.008975769,0.0014882945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002861953,0.000022247075,0.0024675883,0.00013517756,0.0000073620713,0.0003072441,0.13306853,0.00016585439,0.0004134883,0.8246314,0.009104206,0.029648332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012153525,0.00006464142,0.0113555845,0.0012356777,0.000022965538,0.0006754065,0.07790268,0.00043915142,0.0011942999,0.08484115,0.82215637,0.000099903984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18239237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27445254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18239237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023828156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021702552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36266142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947617514","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11571","title":"Developing a Competency Model for Parole Board Members","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Cronbach's alpha; Psychology; Competency assessment; Medical education; Knowledge management; Medicine; Computer science; Psychometrics; Social psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.0809046734998401,"score_gpt":0.4292508049772788,"score_spread":0.3483461314774387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947617514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5081116,0.00036664237,0.35499477,0.0068765976,0.00008568713,0.002374504,0.00038014603,0.0003615009,0.12644853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80059546,0.0001816725,0.19233708,0.00025530878,0.0000065424706,0.0010870675,0.00028235913,0.00002408472,0.0052304096],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958127,0.0025603597,0.00014906834,0.0002866599,0.0009113995,0.00027973566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935801,0.002991326,0.0004854202,0.00040844333,0.0019235525,0.0006111699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005665743,0.00048528926,0.0002619782,0.0020956835,0.0013390693,0.0024411713,0.0011571986,0.0009049023,0.0024808862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011517125,0.00020804648,0.00046774544,0.00061082427,0.0015621672,0.0024666088,0.0022244565,0.0013179529,0.00081707275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018457485,0.0020457685,0.11883395,0.0007253031,0.00007343092,0.00069012656,0.065456755,0.028362859,0.0061706346,0.2775575,0.015300496,0.48459864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018298502,0.0013624755,0.10994299,0.0027555434,0.00008665609,0.00161924,0.14287636,0.36735153,0.012134125,0.20713767,0.15421009,0.00034040408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0094113005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013552069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0094113005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035665296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008765376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029963732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947753103","doi":"","title":"Settlement Conferences and Judicial Role: The Scaffolding for Expanded Thinking about Judicial Ethics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Mediation; Political science; Judicial opinion; Settlement (finance); Engineering ethics; Action (physics); Task (project management); Sociology; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.058166659278520924,"score_gpt":0.40075243274369904,"score_spread":0.3425857734651781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947753103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22803545,0.0023006373,0.045228757,0.065652244,0.0005153758,0.00020076403,0.000062305044,0.00026132725,0.65774316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98270655,0.00041829175,0.0071289977,0.0011134327,0.000051523602,0.000038570193,0.00001918954,0.000056058743,0.0084672915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.980548,0.012989014,0.000430466,0.0011717957,0.0023627598,0.0024978896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509038,0.03202615,0.0037072976,0.0036401611,0.004868292,0.004854282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0233491,0.00046912202,0.00051029486,0.0023054257,0.017339293,0.020471986,0.0030723012,0.0042221867,0.011204182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06142541,0.0006876637,0.0005258602,0.0017891873,0.055979997,0.014538688,0.010231894,0.006885812,0.00064740813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042746626,0.000056370096,0.003543587,0.000085240514,0.0000072077514,0.0004545866,0.2759622,0.00065754564,0.00085566833,0.6789839,0.003763523,0.03558746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006357472,0.00006349546,0.0137996115,0.00067178166,0.000039964634,0.0002558911,0.2919493,0.0029501675,0.0010558877,0.49436653,0.19461325,0.00017064321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23348404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37921157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23348404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025307722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042694565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46425003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947885322","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5786","title":"Informal Justice: An Examination of Why Ontarians Do Not Seek Legal Advice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legal psychology; Adjudication; Political science; Legal culture; Legal profession; Premise; Legal research; Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Scholarship; Law; Legal advice; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.059316527181500094,"score_gpt":0.3957055367769666,"score_spread":0.3363890095954665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947885322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9318954,0.0014738053,0.00039366347,0.022968,0.00014045899,0.000054546243,0.00009462094,0.000023670511,0.04295592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98688126,0.000941847,0.00020206465,0.004729698,0.000038927425,0.000027372884,0.000042498043,0.000019004996,0.0071173483],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924211,0.0018823753,0.0003201506,0.0004862635,0.0024680258,0.002422136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98555493,0.0056676613,0.0028065308,0.00043928623,0.002222248,0.00330925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039350186,0.00012871627,0.0003673144,0.0023783862,0.015443885,0.0065112496,0.0018440167,0.0018921808,0.006429583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01712448,0.00028573824,0.0002590125,0.0041843913,0.008943561,0.0032129881,0.006231814,0.0028687106,0.000423407],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004853904,0.00021345554,0.10134502,0.00022650199,0.000019291208,0.0014338013,0.8056962,0.000028132485,0.00030457496,0.015488732,0.015658457,0.059537437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073905685,0.000039031023,0.077798165,0.00037684356,0.000011846949,0.0002854859,0.8696622,0.00008627445,0.00007916996,0.0017203643,0.049906537,0.000026631982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34143743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55676514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65856254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015354149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026580164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6789001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948412693","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5784","title":"L’accès à la justice en contexte numérique : l’information juridique par et pour les justiciables sur les médias sociaux","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10363388441470366,"score_gpt":0.4088481063230622,"score_spread":0.3052142219083585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948412693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16806503,0.014770019,0.013601527,0.075609855,0.0011536153,0.00017942609,0.0015551057,0.0002525211,0.7248129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8763541,0.010236132,0.0049199197,0.0042483485,0.00031163247,0.00015448111,0.00041875587,0.00012871364,0.10322779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952251,0.0017307203,0.00013953642,0.00041832836,0.0018179597,0.00066840847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923309,0.0025836579,0.00073915237,0.0004586172,0.0028557219,0.0010319556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029844828,0.00052053266,0.0005716207,0.0034449268,0.015206669,0.015461144,0.0014461008,0.0023009486,0.030972304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010645015,0.0003155043,0.00033462455,0.004615481,0.010350671,0.007303217,0.0054219603,0.002948706,0.0021130864],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014901422,0.00008772007,0.020720366,0.00096672715,0.00005505393,0.0007503092,0.2752959,0.0006207662,0.0013037407,0.48738775,0.04639162,0.166271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015142696,0.000040642542,0.044898752,0.0020010371,0.00005342239,0.0003718487,0.12882313,0.0005881736,0.0006254672,0.01972369,0.80270743,0.00015125556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8196502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88405365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8196502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042195063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041269545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36282384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948617432","doi":"10.4324/9781351052467-6","title":"Launching Careers in Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05918613757334021,"score_gpt":0.36625117139186947,"score_spread":0.30706503381852923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948617432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89125985,0.0025272751,0.0005241477,0.012168903,0.00018632364,0.00005232779,0.00034539422,0.00004424958,0.0928915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93449545,0.0040780543,0.0006905825,0.00095104816,0.0000852462,0.000026403986,0.00027037214,0.000029386109,0.05937343],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992035,0.00012055577,0.000013458662,0.00007220978,0.00016734703,0.00042290395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680626,0.00052934745,0.00028995448,0.00004563362,0.00031014238,0.0020187288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009941789,0.0001446414,0.00019964422,0.001108755,0.0040046065,0.00367993,0.0006979257,0.0007049986,0.016086768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034629528,0.0002268218,0.00024401472,0.00088007574,0.001200627,0.0019361455,0.0016318557,0.00199069,0.0029128958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080394355,0.00068894314,0.5908201,0.0002043932,0.000011927671,0.0018333163,0.11814526,0.00024825582,0.0017366043,0.032404784,0.041951783,0.21187428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010261626,0.00018498243,0.6448366,0.0011336174,0.000010558709,0.0012147496,0.1985894,0.0005348871,0.00038637605,0.0053497176,0.14771044,0.000038454633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03818147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13753667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03818147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002401715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008262309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075918496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949479188","doi":"","title":"PROTECTING THE PUBLIC INTEREST","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Public interest; Public law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Public policy; Economics","score_opus":0.16042853497149698,"score_gpt":0.39811916092067406,"score_spread":0.2376906259491771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949479188","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010872525,0.004898664,0.0069924025,0.51198196,0.0017462111,0.00017498234,0.000109478184,0.00010236361,0.4631215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6192682,0.0058928225,0.010270748,0.28041384,0.0024333384,0.00032353855,0.000145866,0.00012768203,0.08112397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9477502,0.014268938,0.0012654279,0.0060346164,0.020237166,0.01044365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9255207,0.028855309,0.003639291,0.008403094,0.02456795,0.009013617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05157,0.00055490364,0.00083261164,0.0028556404,0.01605192,0.0220165,0.004545637,0.01844499,0.011543663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10092641,0.00057451177,0.0009093341,0.0016435895,0.03631432,0.012414206,0.010589912,0.01962387,0.0019411766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007609757,0.000026948434,0.0007950331,0.00006042634,0.0000124295975,0.00006565144,0.002575819,0.00019400597,0.00020778421,0.93963456,0.03935067,0.017069044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003711268,0.000041631276,0.0032027492,0.00084284524,0.00004176453,0.00008143177,0.0040351995,0.00048488035,0.00062957377,0.21924628,0.7712777,0.000078771765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46344876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4871832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53655124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047503483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20648257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92150235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949668285","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5789","title":"Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada: Towards Accessible Dispute Resolution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Intervention (counseling); Resolution (logic); Element (criminal law); Civil procedure; Determinative; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07811686466140803,"score_gpt":0.39798115150442565,"score_spread":0.3198642868430176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949668285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14171432,0.023155691,0.103350475,0.1781906,0.0017649772,0.001133554,0.0007972708,0.0007295213,0.5491637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7650029,0.01426809,0.08141758,0.014799795,0.00038345432,0.0002199237,0.0005972659,0.00015269173,0.123158276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98770577,0.0020728307,0.00043844615,0.000984833,0.0065567745,0.0022412858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867231,0.0031558862,0.0005905969,0.00071349595,0.006013888,0.0028029857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091347005,0.00033399474,0.00049366755,0.0022450106,0.015906861,0.0102973655,0.003460229,0.0042312597,0.009523088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022107346,0.0005575037,0.0005110019,0.003205744,0.008720646,0.0036434378,0.0070023825,0.005165795,0.0008816633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055618293,0.0001152927,0.0052212593,0.00041577476,0.000022260272,0.00091431895,0.02041078,0.0042099464,0.0010491945,0.5935508,0.064711474,0.30932334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011912331,0.00007916948,0.023263037,0.00078918005,0.000049058395,0.00029581314,0.012176341,0.007826966,0.0013162637,0.091929905,0.86196303,0.00019210161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98798275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09954683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09954683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30699953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7222662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950555679","doi":"","title":"Creating a Classroom of Integrity: Four Strategies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholar Works at UT Tyler (The University of Texas at Tyler)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.031764784723696954,"score_gpt":0.290320822590103,"score_spread":0.258556037866406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950555679","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01748585,0.013561901,0.059409417,0.4757587,0.005185547,0.0014897987,0.00007549136,0.0007915182,0.42624176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6509992,0.014109079,0.09815962,0.08078441,0.0016130824,0.006180564,0.00018599365,0.0011134393,0.14685462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94656813,0.040961243,0.00096358085,0.0023430598,0.0049970094,0.004167015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95979947,0.01494913,0.0020893142,0.0029937674,0.006874616,0.013293666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03925942,0.002932865,0.0011330588,0.005933412,0.034070786,0.037478436,0.0066674883,0.019273737,0.01428323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043698713,0.0012235396,0.0013423951,0.0029446532,0.06409466,0.049270604,0.044588838,0.025709104,0.0066681732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006320098,0.00020374733,0.001064457,0.00045270796,0.000017413073,0.0003721762,0.14895286,0.00009061173,0.00020197024,0.7328089,0.058748584,0.057023477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068212285,0.00012175728,0.0007255142,0.0016650367,0.000021189944,0.00055527297,0.2968947,0.00032948176,0.00045927928,0.27780887,0.42127183,0.00007881629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007859424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01189665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03925942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018064924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034922536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2076261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951183103","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Discussion of Who Pays for Document Discovery in Australia, Canada, Guernsey (Channel Islands), and Singapore and Its Effect on Access to Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Channel (broadcasting); Political science; Law; Geography; Genealogy; History; Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.1171093796009748,"score_gpt":0.4605745481095163,"score_spread":0.34346516850854153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951183103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57366467,0.012223824,0.001034729,0.13756597,0.00023292983,0.00010690351,0.00041558463,0.000022972758,0.27473235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979357,0.0030588096,0.00023982475,0.0062319543,0.00005961716,0.00003473951,0.000038124574,0.000012704041,0.0109671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98188895,0.0060790107,0.0007623307,0.0008341813,0.005202689,0.0052328887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9021289,0.07305891,0.0059816847,0.001654678,0.011604349,0.0055714874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017408554,0.00013469382,0.00071688415,0.0036780755,0.013730304,0.011301701,0.0024890916,0.004159798,0.0069771134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064013444,0.00035583106,0.00075716194,0.00806526,0.010746668,0.0058395234,0.0038951463,0.005209074,0.00028390097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019171118,0.00022855087,0.09790347,0.0005347591,0.00016301752,0.0012403855,0.08096668,0.0005802929,0.00042711466,0.7517736,0.022143917,0.043846533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010682349,0.00028897575,0.4510971,0.00188839,0.00072753883,0.0008331896,0.26189208,0.0016794199,0.0012610361,0.045990247,0.23406102,0.00017415927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78336394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9231889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21663606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042585004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0755053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43582374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951512820","doi":"10.26522/brocked.v28i2.801","title":"Editorial: Where do cross disciplinary interests in educational research merge?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Brock Education Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Brock University","keywords":"Cross disciplinary; Merge (version control); Discipline; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Philosophy; Computer science; Data science; Engineering","score_opus":0.07294816450415988,"score_gpt":0.5145930791552139,"score_spread":0.44164491465105404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951512820","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022058677,0.0014105622,0.00007484449,0.036682628,0.96052945,0.000029334184,0.000056756682,0.000053834632,0.0011406317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00033445106,0.0018289026,0.00011337708,0.026335776,0.96330607,0.000041941043,0.00004540845,0.000054534492,0.007939528],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867401,0.00251626,0.0019141601,0.0014044392,0.006500666,0.0009243852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9439295,0.021966456,0.0026894454,0.0014303378,0.023285132,0.0066990233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0145025365,0.0043790443,0.0063248836,0.0063903616,0.006648617,0.013513885,0.0053295884,0.024918592,0.02688305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06027329,0.0018932231,0.004025182,0.0027138586,0.0041363067,0.006681186,0.0025774683,0.027402917,0.023920773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026617043,0.000008459762,0.000016376358,0.0001247131,0.000012998711,0.00006339958,0.000010389809,0.000009814039,0.000026590327,0.0001501081,0.9975327,0.0020178144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014491049,0.00004563526,0.0004483385,0.001111735,0.00011396316,0.00031205232,0.00011290657,0.0002589221,0.0001642416,0.0020400297,0.99520445,0.000042803404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028670304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078892335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02688305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047216285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069792713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08993274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951775022","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2898174","title":"Law, Trust and Institutional Change in China: Evidence from Qualitative Fieldwork","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"China; Institutional change; Political science; Law; Qualitative research; Sociology; Public administration; Social science","score_opus":0.10750228776844231,"score_gpt":0.46182052613770486,"score_spread":0.3543182383692626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951775022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99823797,0.00024571602,0.0001260814,0.00035404137,0.00000496458,0.000034308436,0.00003132649,0.00000122476,0.0009642207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958426,0.00008779009,0.000054104214,0.00006342494,0.0000015778934,0.000024572044,0.000017121167,7.8931134e-7,0.0001664056],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935462,0.0032365168,0.00034782296,0.0005622083,0.0009119834,0.0013952428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712791,0.019005867,0.0037972513,0.0012757538,0.0024972842,0.0021447185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012732936,0.00035746905,0.000833515,0.004243452,0.0072590103,0.003771334,0.0016472829,0.0013014855,0.0026953197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019299004,0.0005016135,0.00037776286,0.0067818044,0.008930274,0.0038880352,0.0038231686,0.0015722959,0.00010349396],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012703614,0.0005678436,0.40309063,0.0003911231,0.00007299261,0.0006542257,0.5666517,0.00029449508,0.0005574737,0.007708229,0.00078274956,0.019101508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029345185,0.00015329642,0.32324976,0.00031872935,0.000059390375,0.00008174397,0.6704573,0.0009937441,0.00035316544,0.0013826591,0.0028748002,0.000046051115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19205992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25365594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19205992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017120115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027839467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38188404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951987241","doi":"10.29173/alr2526","title":"The Harms Caused: A Narrative of Intergenerational Responsibility","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Witness; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Settlement (finance); Dispute resolution; Indigenous; Narrative; Sociology; Compensation (psychology); Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; History","score_opus":0.036699511141800485,"score_gpt":0.40021869338330907,"score_spread":0.3635191822415086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951987241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42993507,0.007076711,0.009005274,0.10973537,0.0010613786,0.00021064146,0.00013029638,0.00013614984,0.44270915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97720474,0.0013945538,0.00054903975,0.0032843056,0.000072024035,0.00006382875,0.000019856181,0.000058739814,0.017352888],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872838,0.007173667,0.0001923126,0.00076127733,0.0019404056,0.0026485387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99408984,0.0030719317,0.00046744902,0.00050228456,0.0008281952,0.001040203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008098471,0.0009609035,0.0007226914,0.0020619328,0.07154342,0.013818478,0.004956696,0.0062412624,0.002873289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100054145,0.0007899119,0.0008727816,0.0020125082,0.089642175,0.012514448,0.021674667,0.017288426,0.00035066667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049644386,0.000010546435,0.00039844005,0.000012483621,0.0000029629375,0.0011315094,0.89953524,0.000068351685,0.000064328335,0.095661186,0.0019060918,0.0012038114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049108985,0.0000133255735,0.00069643353,0.0001547318,0.000013162101,0.00086510484,0.8540744,0.00021020297,0.00019860813,0.019999092,0.12373506,0.000034925142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4183965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38703975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5816035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038766082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029818846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8319223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953525916","doi":"","title":"THE JUDGES AND THE JOURNALS: CITATION OF PERIODICAL LITERATURE BY THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA, 1985-2004","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Listing (finance); Citation; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.029198872574553125,"score_gpt":0.33127587282036786,"score_spread":0.30207700024581474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953525916","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29136318,0.4409255,0.0005859169,0.056791022,0.0043053525,0.00022302529,0.037521414,0.0002252481,0.16805926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7971535,0.15451156,0.0009431651,0.0033880468,0.0013889302,0.00006904039,0.007688439,0.00009426799,0.034763083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846918,0.00084686367,0.0010103903,0.00073542417,0.011283943,0.0014315809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8592282,0.015500118,0.024314746,0.0014109506,0.093349285,0.006196666],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005508114,0.00043037182,0.00066505297,0.06840774,0.007057961,0.009045693,0.0017292406,0.0012143962,0.0037515587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08129661,0.00043620818,0.00034455498,0.1310228,0.0039009617,0.0019079635,0.0019218058,0.0010157204,0.0005380238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034754572,0.00007691646,0.19950803,0.00675761,0.00033215503,0.0014786111,0.030638732,0.0008227905,0.0013519105,0.033621404,0.41017658,0.3148877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002569489,0.000034698576,0.5408939,0.0029397556,0.00022800469,0.00040384688,0.012715258,0.00034315838,0.00068123004,0.0012942697,0.4403326,0.00010754065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98006517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99200505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9315923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1150703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19380313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83489734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953754178","doi":"","title":"BOOK REVIEW - COMPTE RENDU - DIRECTORS’ LIABILITY IN CANADA - DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS IN CANADA: LAW AND PRACTICE","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Law; Political science; Accounting; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.03665905153826144,"score_gpt":0.33799145454480234,"score_spread":0.3013324030065409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953754178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037234244,0.2964915,0.00060840446,0.28572097,0.061828464,0.00031993724,0.003019397,0.00029164323,0.34799618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043970224,0.16110124,0.0009780446,0.09802383,0.014670725,0.00019149337,0.0017802983,0.00018903296,0.6790951],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938065,0.00037790538,0.00025467778,0.00031146748,0.004454054,0.00079536764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709774,0.004108145,0.00084740843,0.00046656805,0.022027725,0.0015727762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045015924,0.00063722313,0.0011218244,0.0063388916,0.005667806,0.008216557,0.0031840904,0.00984869,0.025547033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018133746,0.00078500813,0.0007379327,0.009669865,0.0032741202,0.001866417,0.0009832624,0.0046221297,0.004651548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032835749,0.0000042026086,0.00018458665,0.00014010425,0.0000039797546,0.000020180065,0.000058714544,0.000051497456,0.00002338017,0.0037565236,0.9870588,0.008694735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005956473,0.000005722572,0.0024225817,0.00054027216,0.000015628784,0.000034930297,0.00015972205,0.000058529884,0.00003980922,0.0006426889,0.9960582,0.000015888865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91149503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9797285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08850497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054975986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12720272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39888054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955881893","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: New Brunswick Graduate Students: Legal and Other Support Services","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduate students; Political science; Public relations; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.2614205500022531,"score_gpt":0.5226560634810431,"score_spread":0.26123551347879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955881893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031671128,0.0015886273,0.0035091196,0.01804204,0.0014204028,0.004129697,0.030128267,0.0033652624,0.9346496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045693396,0.0023612059,0.0062234798,0.0047384896,0.00009350598,0.0028454536,0.0063821846,0.0006984902,0.97208786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990515,0.00023912778,0.0000790387,0.00007987434,0.00035912037,0.00019131954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935947,0.0013316353,0.00020919566,0.0002881984,0.003009876,0.0015664618],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003080658,0.00081853353,0.00063396257,0.0021658766,0.0059401398,0.003446253,0.0022362426,0.002219604,0.3812138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064884108,0.0011574152,0.00022817096,0.0031110113,0.001009358,0.0032656188,0.0022678897,0.00300006,0.21056883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070115443,0.000035114972,0.00018312404,0.000059889215,2.549438e-7,0.00003842891,0.0008048594,0.000013955867,0.00007706144,0.0010406242,0.9689484,0.02879134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010432787,0.00000926645,0.00088294444,0.00010698641,6.511817e-7,0.000024147095,0.002771816,0.000016140983,0.00007476046,0.00037937338,0.9957151,0.00000827516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28910488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76176876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059177727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035790157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8826234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957179129","doi":"10.1177/1477878519862543","title":"Academic freedom in primary and secondary school teaching","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison","keywords":"Academic freedom; Accountability; Sociology; Pedagogy; Discipline; Autonomy; Higher education; Mathematics education; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.0516342208302493,"score_gpt":0.4737615604211061,"score_spread":0.4221273395908568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957179129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38944077,0.003501559,0.005437329,0.049325712,0.00036500723,0.000059523485,0.000048998092,0.000038819206,0.55178225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99510705,0.00017147171,0.00012917344,0.0006712015,0.000068673864,0.000010359119,0.0000051299357,0.000006407536,0.0038305107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829038,0.007956479,0.00069985277,0.0013375516,0.003500442,0.0036018721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716295,0.016222488,0.0031416188,0.0020533449,0.0018130963,0.0051400834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012670031,0.00017292505,0.0005920048,0.0021211172,0.013151474,0.013831905,0.0012842433,0.0040079304,0.0059473803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028190129,0.000316717,0.0005744841,0.0017595566,0.06280328,0.007255775,0.011681107,0.005953484,0.00046708641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016568983,0.00006647235,0.0034163985,0.000020349395,0.0000043519835,0.00012615559,0.031091982,0.00011507583,0.00007808513,0.95770425,0.00094994536,0.0064103217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005429948,0.00006578037,0.014784926,0.0002870969,0.000014156776,0.00020520786,0.049775146,0.00046394052,0.00049903116,0.8617329,0.07206891,0.00004857914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017954662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018778643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017954662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011690486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014561797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08482081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957687304","doi":"","title":"Practices of Ethics: An Empirical approach to Ethics in Social Sciences researchces of Ethics: An Empirical approach to Ethics in Social Sciences research","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Linguistic Association","funders":"","keywords":"Applied ethics; Meta-ethics; Information ethics; Research ethics; Normative ethics; Engineering ethics; Nursing ethics; Sociology; Business ethics; Empirical research; Ethics of technology; Social science; Political science; Epistemology; Public relations; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8450983083599324,"score_gpt":0.6954978706098945,"score_spread":0.14960043775003784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957687304","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074829705,0.0060277386,0.46168044,0.19268586,0.0010563304,0.0010794285,0.00014777195,0.00012639617,0.26236632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8968869,0.0017982301,0.08857112,0.005624933,0.00033267276,0.0014957631,0.00004403272,0.00009792713,0.005148504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8814585,0.10491969,0.00289183,0.0022531357,0.006873183,0.0016036575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7506545,0.2171739,0.008077199,0.00887655,0.011465286,0.0037525655],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07381279,0.0009473758,0.0011668924,0.0068066996,0.010631345,0.019363506,0.0029800877,0.0071124225,0.0036591024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09942794,0.0009410344,0.0009736876,0.0056125564,0.10470437,0.025321435,0.01052926,0.010408776,0.00036359564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044313133,0.000033892255,0.00039934722,0.00008483611,0.000004477677,0.00004607228,0.025684353,0.0001010321,0.000042486336,0.96908915,0.00068506337,0.0038249136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024037587,0.00001780196,0.00048695525,0.00063174975,0.000010483033,0.0001273167,0.03657297,0.00096699473,0.00016997292,0.9386189,0.022356208,0.00001669148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003450899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031156037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99288756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010796813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02170557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.390364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2958383422","doi":"10.11575/prism/36484","title":"Building a regional academic integrity network: Profiling the growth and action of the Academic Integrity Council of Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Data integrity; Profiling (computer programming); Political science; Computer security; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.2807528854942269,"score_gpt":0.4331516668988155,"score_spread":0.15239878140458862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2958383422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50706506,0.0054033445,0.0035296567,0.23729719,0.001042043,0.0007821891,0.0017943666,0.0004082789,0.24267781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9172151,0.0029319504,0.0040419837,0.006727635,0.00015136023,0.00021479398,0.000786939,0.00025045208,0.06767982],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784405,0.004840006,0.0006436844,0.0012191166,0.007866035,0.0069905515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.932066,0.0056742765,0.0066357427,0.0019826242,0.024123928,0.029517334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0138559975,0.00026838304,0.00040542244,0.003430559,0.027892621,0.011744208,0.0025843016,0.0024109797,0.009537113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03261177,0.00056914246,0.00037092812,0.0070301024,0.010020034,0.0052167396,0.009827713,0.0028316623,0.0012005343],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020868274,0.00012634117,0.13385727,0.0006991913,0.000056369085,0.0016973837,0.40234536,0.00055181555,0.0025365765,0.07382944,0.26861292,0.11547855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012344888,0.000038854127,0.07878289,0.00023488112,0.000016861237,0.00017773634,0.24544261,0.00035525626,0.00030754955,0.001168434,0.673386,0.00007667474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93167937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97017014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11740082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21952125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8518065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959795522","doi":"10.19164/sjppar.v1i2.874","title":"Empathy in the legal profession and its role in shaping my career","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; York University; Northumbria University","keywords":"Empathy; Legal profession; Context (archaeology); Legal practice; Psychology; Reflection (computer programming); Legal education; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Law; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.19449554009059825,"score_gpt":0.5655366004028717,"score_spread":0.37104106031227346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959795522","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25809968,0.016508603,0.019264683,0.4951605,0.0022993083,0.00013669183,0.00003897757,0.00009480637,0.20839678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569132,0.0055170543,0.0038639081,0.021862015,0.00039934792,0.00011326101,0.00000870747,0.000042882733,0.011279628],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790151,0.015498031,0.0002933575,0.0008208624,0.0017297261,0.0026428173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777885,0.011802053,0.002452742,0.000558861,0.0017189801,0.005678938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018272376,0.0003676484,0.00052017084,0.001778577,0.016614012,0.016042171,0.0014475094,0.006218551,0.0035175723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02392074,0.00047377506,0.0005840659,0.00074523775,0.04655594,0.008792339,0.015246531,0.014836296,0.00086653035],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017833898,0.00007429998,0.004221841,0.00012906469,0.000011217083,0.0008647382,0.79082274,0.000118370815,0.0007137047,0.17319535,0.012414364,0.017416392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017231501,0.00014588032,0.005813592,0.0020214324,0.000016682305,0.0030410523,0.6630011,0.0005609856,0.00055077975,0.0848883,0.23982488,0.00011796478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042292373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005005587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018272376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004926766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010011922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096634686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961418416","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3415599","title":"Journal Prestige and Journal Impact in Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prestige; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012732384390847009,"score_gpt":0.365687329738637,"score_spread":0.35295494534779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961418416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9235672,0.0014683008,0.00026028513,0.0059246668,0.00019081734,0.000060024675,0.00038631944,0.00006941674,0.068073034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963793,0.00028946015,0.00005728352,0.00021462902,0.00027919956,0.0000075790367,0.00012975147,0.0000238146,0.0026189669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99305505,0.001975792,0.0005554176,0.00043038293,0.0024780175,0.0015053649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8201051,0.07194275,0.026405472,0.004669581,0.019638766,0.05723831],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057367515,0.00027952017,0.0007007061,0.00853741,0.003225742,0.009147182,0.0011896515,0.0019122744,0.051108424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1150665,0.00039756653,0.0005653708,0.0065237167,0.00361377,0.007051048,0.0056650415,0.0026413752,0.0039724587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017856058,0.0054302807,0.9034555,0.00024244492,0.00041046788,0.0010640682,0.005210783,0.0007195631,0.0013345457,0.011092022,0.01143239,0.0578223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001438215,0.0006780569,0.9782882,0.00011312649,0.0001379244,0.0005232641,0.0055128713,0.00064450427,0.0003877186,0.00909176,0.0044448916,0.000033809694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035386914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006011469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99426323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021591103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031319286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17097467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963085997","doi":"10.29173/alr2542","title":"When Should Casinos Owe a Duty of Care Toward Their Patrons?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Estate; Business; Liability; Appeal; Loyalty; Duty of care; Advertising; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Marketing; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.07263300254091878,"score_gpt":0.38517237982872665,"score_spread":0.3125393772878079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963085997","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15118508,0.004548335,0.004067605,0.5183826,0.0010490521,0.00014273076,0.000096242235,0.00003917325,0.32048926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85556877,0.0026061586,0.00155296,0.090602435,0.0004043766,0.00006226466,0.000033359065,0.000019439567,0.049150202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99294853,0.0014641213,0.0002672651,0.0007032713,0.0022923579,0.0023244603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318564,0.0028469015,0.0006676271,0.00035130593,0.0017083576,0.0012401004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009130291,0.00019217489,0.00037605007,0.0008090494,0.01137344,0.006365525,0.0021293275,0.0144623015,0.004157829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019490099,0.00043897607,0.0003583114,0.00048118667,0.016726617,0.0046666902,0.0024775383,0.009120974,0.00068312796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004228496,0.0001232106,0.020214923,0.00013313022,0.000025249308,0.005012289,0.03615359,0.00019908513,0.0011055678,0.80289155,0.09315459,0.040944595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006865059,0.00016595099,0.03936762,0.0017721674,0.000059564285,0.005453937,0.11946466,0.0014647051,0.0017285317,0.18564466,0.6445739,0.00023560267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35004124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5615437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6499587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01395117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028869236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69600755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963329446","doi":"","title":"ETRE JURISTE AU FEMININ : UNE REALITE EMERGENTE OU UNE QUETE ILLUSOIRE?","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender equality; Political science; Accountability; Humanities; Legal profession; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Art","score_opus":0.06865302323928603,"score_gpt":0.37850059491814736,"score_spread":0.30984757167886134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963329446","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008923731,0.2748738,0.0021029147,0.6022468,0.006298759,0.000020329364,0.00007361063,0.000034243683,0.105425805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49978665,0.29422733,0.0024914525,0.13585076,0.008991912,0.000059796996,0.00012476856,0.00012219475,0.05834507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769338,0.006708958,0.0005201614,0.0022746404,0.009656878,0.0039056423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823629,0.008740533,0.0011579738,0.0006671557,0.0056922124,0.0013792415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014063515,0.00054859347,0.00094339676,0.0028711108,0.011393547,0.016124329,0.0023787494,0.0051060882,0.0054152636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022307225,0.00036623867,0.00042023158,0.0033242425,0.05172456,0.013654986,0.0044984547,0.011887003,0.00072224793],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023500228,0.000019658617,0.0011492661,0.00061328453,0.000017773142,0.0002623297,0.02849509,0.000094226736,0.00024538272,0.8215955,0.062217668,0.08526643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000100360485,0.00001565449,0.0021816033,0.0016825061,0.000012398528,0.0002635161,0.02091833,0.000070770286,0.0001453234,0.03967307,0.93499327,0.000033568613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6122523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.669169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3877477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04877423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07035981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78006244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963525119","doi":"10.29173/alr2546","title":"Measuring the Impacts of Representation in Legal Aid and Community Legal Services Settings: Considerations for Canadian Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Legal service; Legal research; Representation (politics); Empirical research; Public relations; Economic Justice; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Service (business); Legal psychology; Business; Sociology; Law; Marketing; Politics","score_opus":0.15929843749944847,"score_gpt":0.4498071380500514,"score_spread":0.29050870055060296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963525119","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18462451,0.22130966,0.017180778,0.3697185,0.0036355145,0.0037658627,0.006027311,0.0002774077,0.19346051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83411735,0.09067736,0.04145249,0.022144357,0.00047085277,0.0027883688,0.0018972257,0.00022354515,0.006228537],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9063565,0.045101844,0.0055224407,0.003187911,0.028687362,0.011143893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74779224,0.10252674,0.010000068,0.0073861224,0.118501246,0.01379361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1341694,0.0014390779,0.004491808,0.017146926,0.019810393,0.022824807,0.008187705,0.0025950712,0.008300955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23491527,0.0010904819,0.0022610119,0.027116008,0.012730838,0.0126763545,0.015016067,0.005830409,0.00058485445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000366261,0.00063762325,0.15810438,0.013747083,0.0008119623,0.00073389633,0.075586244,0.0029991695,0.0005267006,0.2015945,0.060538646,0.48435366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002043232,0.00071524637,0.37643838,0.058107276,0.0015163876,0.00054463925,0.27303416,0.0046532364,0.0011337895,0.065131314,0.21779698,0.0007243182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9847586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16972592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16972592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4437727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96300024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965447505","doi":"","title":"Against Elected Judges in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chose; Argument (complex analysis); Construct (python library); Citation; Political science; Law; Politics; Economic Justice; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Computer science; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.013225128555833273,"score_gpt":0.30279215466407267,"score_spread":0.28956702610823937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965447505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22366245,0.0076140733,0.0014948613,0.2398879,0.0047578905,0.0004123734,0.00058691035,0.00011919146,0.5214644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8452211,0.0025213407,0.0006568199,0.048155934,0.0005144182,0.000089336405,0.00013744972,0.00006260188,0.10264106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9624338,0.003237126,0.0006946261,0.0028578804,0.011926075,0.018850556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769245,0.003969221,0.000954257,0.0005094503,0.010395974,0.0072465423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01088797,0.00071869075,0.0011838361,0.0024700698,0.054151382,0.012682366,0.0040580905,0.009544796,0.011699646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03525524,0.00072474947,0.00080095016,0.003344663,0.009794626,0.001779921,0.006430058,0.013161783,0.00097210065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029286044,0.00013429012,0.032254845,0.00039404433,0.00018285119,0.00363608,0.0386628,0.0018076288,0.0014224877,0.5197982,0.34574038,0.055673447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039172356,0.00014907507,0.05591531,0.0010109387,0.0003668759,0.0003556263,0.045344442,0.0029682142,0.0018586427,0.035419278,0.85578626,0.00043364454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99086636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99645704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1573453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1573453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31380454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966384940","doi":"10.53300/001c.7956","title":"‘The Difficulties of Communication Encountered by Indigenous Peoples’: Moving Beyond Indigenous Deficit in the Model Admission Rules for Legal Practitioners","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Injustice; Project commissioning; Economic Justice; Public relations; Political science; Law; Legal practice; Sociology; Publishing; Geography","score_opus":0.02226790612203242,"score_gpt":0.3652694916856441,"score_spread":0.34300158556361166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966384940","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43629193,0.0036686957,0.014675756,0.45356694,0.0011948955,0.00027199107,0.000027203901,0.00011529073,0.09018727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689568,0.001098805,0.006524973,0.016034953,0.00026674516,0.00013295852,0.000015674881,0.00004049966,0.0069285897],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9455983,0.03247928,0.002644984,0.0027180088,0.010168445,0.006391023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91761774,0.04943083,0.007336301,0.0038734688,0.010239009,0.0115027325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056009475,0.00032585496,0.0007344794,0.0017205685,0.024531918,0.023399834,0.004578543,0.012129811,0.0047152173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.097607575,0.0010342002,0.0006782209,0.0014280751,0.040630113,0.019897599,0.02460412,0.017904084,0.0007910957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017199329,0.0000799581,0.0037054147,0.00020269424,0.000008180005,0.0012563117,0.88168764,0.00015430109,0.00049689534,0.08217048,0.0049703307,0.025250668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002969446,0.00013991994,0.009694957,0.0017765504,0.000028961285,0.0016617379,0.7674875,0.0014222484,0.0004787594,0.07824001,0.13884641,0.00019327099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10513386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10717419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10513386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0236313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05840713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29620993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967239148","doi":"","title":"From Law to Legal Studies and Beyond: 50 Years of Law and Legal Studies at Carleton University","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Legal profession; Legal realism; Legal education; Perspective (graphical); International Legal English Certificate; Legal history; Comparative law; Sociology; Black letter law; Private law; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.02292183018962755,"score_gpt":0.33876846026738766,"score_spread":0.3158466300777601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967239148","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21567984,0.17160067,0.0011288365,0.423887,0.005069084,0.00015592769,0.0008076996,0.00013715637,0.18153377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7236251,0.08321188,0.0016645327,0.042713843,0.0011875005,0.00012694128,0.0005861086,0.00017150489,0.14671256],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988996,0.0031090085,0.00032625272,0.0007920573,0.002616987,0.004159702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97202116,0.0027846438,0.00076113874,0.0004969481,0.004513262,0.019422717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009275612,0.0002992706,0.00052670797,0.005423838,0.021388955,0.018687515,0.0022049241,0.0033691255,0.009957484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010206568,0.0006934746,0.00022619507,0.0075154025,0.0177517,0.006331213,0.012259848,0.006350363,0.0015218135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101664926,0.0004095376,0.030949183,0.00070093165,0.000023617715,0.0012228976,0.2873746,0.0003778708,0.001040608,0.17662725,0.23435035,0.2668215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040954496,0.000030281428,0.035233773,0.00085307437,0.0000031213758,0.00012373057,0.086553834,0.00007024961,0.00018148648,0.002148969,0.8747579,0.000039456707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79515517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9300984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89415073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10584925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15641187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7679937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969053532","doi":"10.29173/mlj973","title":"A Sign of Things to Come: Legal and Public Policy Issues Raised by the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in Green v. Law Society of Manitoba","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Sign (mathematics); Economic Justice; Precedent; Legal profession; Sociology","score_opus":0.03907506795424565,"score_gpt":0.34518592907804824,"score_spread":0.3061108611238026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969053532","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018493067,0.0043037194,0.00042694883,0.94095975,0.0012706382,0.000030294195,0.00009277956,0.000024997755,0.034397807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3458054,0.0047320523,0.0014215569,0.6082622,0.0008419993,0.00004764715,0.00008120426,0.000059897688,0.03874806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911773,0.001265636,0.00026595464,0.0005884808,0.003240751,0.0034619048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868666,0.006123536,0.0004524788,0.00018708386,0.0035089822,0.002861327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009410767,0.00040579925,0.00058122043,0.0012586778,0.042831637,0.013387401,0.004840473,0.027150381,0.003450553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021736583,0.00073747494,0.0006839018,0.0020420603,0.015872555,0.004047764,0.0037162972,0.031271856,0.00030296532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072596704,0.00007996451,0.008572013,0.00015588339,0.000054684697,0.0028836273,0.035828505,0.00045392892,0.00057489495,0.49492076,0.4297855,0.026617575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001617911,0.000080678634,0.022995569,0.0013859073,0.00028072734,0.0010376066,0.08899785,0.00184241,0.0017671986,0.08420612,0.7967904,0.00045378422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98481095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103696845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.103696845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28353855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7523768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970327687","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3435517","title":"Celebrating 30 Years of the Indigenous Blacks &amp;amp; Mi’kmaq Initiative: How the Creation of a Critical Mass of Black and Aboriginal Lawyers is Making a Difference in Nova Scotia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Indigenous; Nova (rocket); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Public administration; Library science; Gerontology; Medicine; Ethnology; Engineering","score_opus":0.029834560001898332,"score_gpt":0.3702716531340506,"score_spread":0.34043709313215226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970327687","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31724378,0.0021678738,0.0005297198,0.61579263,0.0031537686,0.00007102838,0.00008228655,0.00006667753,0.060892288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83118594,0.0007936531,0.00054358,0.08306553,0.0004362508,0.00006302413,0.000042202824,0.00009640507,0.08377341],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941863,0.0018108807,0.00006782153,0.00034715465,0.0008816821,0.0027062087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727686,0.0044424473,0.0010581595,0.0005062351,0.002181888,0.019042654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009618855,0.00028525863,0.00028296246,0.00066542637,0.046394277,0.010232136,0.0020899682,0.0072895847,0.009990916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013978432,0.0003871621,0.00028447915,0.00045985435,0.015058654,0.0040651616,0.01186324,0.013710083,0.0008993972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015127871,0.00022514208,0.015228393,0.00017079788,0.000031899857,0.0021311117,0.6823572,0.000109051885,0.0022305504,0.042458344,0.21512221,0.03978408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019508721,0.00009768446,0.03024775,0.00026820903,0.000018762463,0.00023440905,0.4805619,0.00009071045,0.00056070945,0.004515544,0.48332796,0.000056817575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5830546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8630892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97142214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028577866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.093158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83880174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970334012","doi":"10.24926/25730037.588","title":"Uncommon Misconceptions: Holding Physicians Accountable for Insemination Fraud","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minnesota journal of law & inequality","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insemination; Donor insemination; Business; Medicine; Artificial insemination; Andrology; Biology; Pregnancy; Genetics","score_opus":0.07735484224371605,"score_gpt":0.41590747485339324,"score_spread":0.33855263260967716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970334012","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12453858,0.010341322,0.0026123754,0.80615926,0.0018178445,0.00003028198,0.00003882229,0.0000701545,0.054391384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8010531,0.006503475,0.0017742204,0.18278134,0.002043483,0.000028381255,0.00003275766,0.000042923955,0.0057402737],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98716146,0.006999368,0.00067832787,0.00093553995,0.002657893,0.0015674131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92215794,0.050509963,0.011681762,0.003005835,0.0037681274,0.008876275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012904233,0.00013283962,0.00022308153,0.0012024272,0.009044283,0.005296458,0.0011198812,0.0056954804,0.004768148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08550442,0.00031755603,0.00030963836,0.0008644406,0.011302766,0.0050118677,0.00483778,0.007988592,0.0007022547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009171302,0.00026996844,0.13960466,0.00023157829,0.00005124948,0.010311357,0.119705886,0.00022885457,0.0004732862,0.12113463,0.29986143,0.30803537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006886639,0.00033402618,0.07021905,0.004032607,0.00013152366,0.03148633,0.12829842,0.0018009498,0.0012553851,0.094051495,0.6681576,0.00016383502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010058027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018424314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012904233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042359377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00869823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068244874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972459874","doi":"","title":"Critical Perspectives on the Scholarship of Assessment and Learning in Law: Volume 1: England","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coursework; Scholarship; Set (abstract data type); Argument (complex analysis); Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.08721678299086998,"score_gpt":0.44103480732303074,"score_spread":0.35381802433216075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972459874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008809202,0.21167167,0.0061979797,0.46010244,0.008673057,0.00013909121,0.00009723123,0.000037510974,0.30427173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66499186,0.10202906,0.0039715515,0.10277846,0.016198143,0.0006831487,0.000092441696,0.00016727281,0.10908808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886974,0.008203767,0.000338654,0.00070458115,0.0012271483,0.0008284199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799543,0.016902218,0.00069297664,0.0005990902,0.001279181,0.0005721778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009494919,0.0007132847,0.0009802026,0.0035272795,0.011818304,0.017782979,0.0025858756,0.0145767685,0.008106366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019799443,0.00038801727,0.000529121,0.003475265,0.05355414,0.01899501,0.008504082,0.0104591865,0.0010050691],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069122407,0.000013400622,0.00010808573,0.000114654234,0.0000014761962,0.00011967868,0.020085959,0.00006257462,0.000021028125,0.95493203,0.019251414,0.0052828765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000837237,0.000024840958,0.00056690583,0.002056189,0.0000031407826,0.00026876148,0.02669892,0.00018792202,0.00007493755,0.41047695,0.5596108,0.000022309292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023404045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022512479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02367052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02367052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094728675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1717425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974933195","doi":"","title":"Orphans No More: A Review of Elizabeth Sanderson, Government Lawyering: Duties and Ethical Challenges of Government Lawyers (Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, 2018)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Parliament; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Public administration; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04522551080187164,"score_gpt":0.3766295842658902,"score_spread":0.33140407346401857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974933195","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004536639,0.9952773,0.000025482432,0.0032098417,0.0008159388,0.000003954005,0.000009848903,0.0000015514806,0.0006108052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00056152797,0.99345076,0.000079289726,0.0038693105,0.0006492417,0.000011029552,0.000021144724,0.0000031547866,0.001354527],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984577,0.00055145397,0.00016714606,0.00014408231,0.0005960962,0.00008355211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638236,0.0020707403,0.00031256827,0.00005788768,0.0009799553,0.00019639893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022811724,0.00074696087,0.0013825881,0.0038575176,0.0009934527,0.0025781647,0.00090949784,0.0021482243,0.0038406022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070850877,0.0006286846,0.0005237417,0.0076256036,0.0016504185,0.0040250616,0.0015700302,0.0036499244,0.0014226049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052829066,0.000044318636,0.00031859672,0.038525373,0.00011151983,0.00020124557,0.0019153422,0.00015204713,0.00029630677,0.012221245,0.6134549,0.3327063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054051393,0.000019882413,0.00055517844,0.014073093,0.000039016482,0.00019115617,0.00050862494,0.000010060603,0.00003577432,0.00088241993,0.98366886,0.000010584343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0222754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060132783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003214398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012104804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044291437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977658000","doi":"","title":"Legal, Ethical and Privacy Issues Affecting Data Sharing among Ontario's Higher Education Institutions in Interinstitutional Collaboration.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The College Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Legal responsibility; Public relations; Political science; Information privacy; Sociology; Internet privacy; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.08851696382790589,"score_gpt":0.419153417160577,"score_spread":0.3306364533326711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977658000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62433386,0.0025624537,0.005869381,0.2340063,0.00034459587,0.00048448378,0.0005362578,0.00005866902,0.13180391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888426,0.000541453,0.0011867116,0.0036529698,0.00004045156,0.000056375546,0.000048599963,0.000013264537,0.005617681],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9308653,0.03685921,0.0039931834,0.0020854375,0.01634804,0.00984892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8066948,0.119899094,0.019287141,0.008668754,0.024824575,0.020625617],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045978215,0.00014428944,0.00033158544,0.0011713877,0.030514972,0.01254668,0.0020058192,0.0036220658,0.0037688818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1444339,0.00042622347,0.00035840727,0.004407246,0.012499931,0.004982435,0.010206756,0.0041071842,0.00026953954],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038993094,0.0001833608,0.23911335,0.0003605364,0.000103538114,0.00223574,0.44275892,0.0014653471,0.0011220359,0.14575265,0.05768282,0.108831756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006704671,0.00010111314,0.13363625,0.0009913655,0.000112468915,0.0005503399,0.6095378,0.0017902916,0.0012615919,0.03357055,0.2182286,0.00015266349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86221486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93460834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07508641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2551167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54479253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977837159","doi":"10.3968/11249","title":"The Value of Supervision of Administrative Reconsideration Under the Vision of People’s Supervision Theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Value (mathematics); Ideology; China; Sinicization; Function (biology); Control (management); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Epistemology; Law; Management; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04631595663752021,"score_gpt":0.3851029560516821,"score_spread":0.3387869994141619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977837159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10999778,0.0038320373,0.07887886,0.09314813,0.000837638,0.00014224078,0.00009036849,0.00018171113,0.7128912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98916465,0.0003814471,0.0041412795,0.0009965714,0.00017396922,0.000047816993,0.000012605834,0.000015820684,0.005065802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900311,0.0057465145,0.00024175383,0.0008503374,0.0021353632,0.0009949732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99116266,0.0030023155,0.0011149127,0.0012378105,0.0020788827,0.0014034426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009298707,0.00020945047,0.0003325044,0.0012735389,0.0035447583,0.005091761,0.0011302857,0.0021976326,0.002766267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011154539,0.00019266826,0.00038382105,0.00081445824,0.04066358,0.00537187,0.0033985837,0.0031153918,0.00026101756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008043243,0.000011912573,0.00047980534,0.000012501285,0.000002699179,0.000024608122,0.0021676947,0.00022425562,0.000023545006,0.99214077,0.001152265,0.003751829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034224293,0.00003385723,0.001229422,0.00008359105,0.000007090448,0.000067865185,0.0018684407,0.00158173,0.00014806815,0.9629497,0.031980965,0.000015125999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008946753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063791415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009298707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007818604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012823169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056728244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979150231","doi":"10.29173/alr2562","title":"Back to Burgess: The Impact of the White Burgess Expert Evidence Regime in Alberta Decisions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Function (biology); Law; White paper; Economic Justice; White (mutation); Work (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0823747958156161,"score_gpt":0.4340354438458232,"score_spread":0.35166064803020713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979150231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13890345,0.016155478,0.0029921017,0.26979354,0.0011119738,0.00012942267,0.00018486785,0.00007742292,0.57065177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8525145,0.0060214573,0.0020437702,0.0701819,0.00035632227,0.000038741502,0.000074732634,0.000040234532,0.06872839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97168726,0.00672495,0.00060715736,0.0015224115,0.013327649,0.0061305193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96207833,0.025326634,0.001005468,0.0008632171,0.0077957585,0.0029305932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022938896,0.0002597668,0.00043326893,0.0027000883,0.016542444,0.020819798,0.0041628545,0.010032113,0.00501075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04870796,0.0006193178,0.0005179775,0.003293474,0.021651747,0.004013157,0.0070065623,0.010594304,0.0003242525],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071143324,0.000058236845,0.005704902,0.0001592501,0.000038763596,0.0018533376,0.014161337,0.0013909998,0.0005883284,0.86786324,0.056869093,0.05124136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001410239,0.00015710208,0.052765135,0.0020078674,0.00024794918,0.00068470003,0.05065293,0.003977631,0.0017596404,0.20881587,0.6783861,0.0004039775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91842026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9694997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081579745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07819555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1332083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5673511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979507979","doi":"","title":"Prosecutors and Wrongful Convictions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Conviction; Injustice; Sanctions; Law; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.024178780701517605,"score_gpt":0.37874686615631087,"score_spread":0.35456808545479324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979507979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6998951,0.051208626,0.002599529,0.04310592,0.0007141339,0.000082073675,0.00019697747,0.000051632076,0.202146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98244745,0.008626487,0.00021850178,0.0013879648,0.00025124685,0.00002275395,0.000068406225,0.000017524164,0.0069596283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99197704,0.0038406835,0.00054475124,0.00044501433,0.001692165,0.0015002728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9512605,0.027352056,0.015729917,0.0009411108,0.0027331866,0.0019833068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043214513,0.00020640616,0.0004432759,0.0029913282,0.0028674232,0.0047923215,0.00084507064,0.0031257025,0.009135611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041117664,0.00028511725,0.00034737663,0.0022347143,0.005030406,0.002508041,0.0042157304,0.0036379925,0.00079207815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001984548,0.0005587957,0.38661465,0.0006353782,0.00012285178,0.0059853164,0.059010226,0.001560365,0.00025656915,0.39308506,0.03195872,0.12001366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007855177,0.00036145776,0.48521996,0.0062790653,0.00012564719,0.010726306,0.07230668,0.0022820423,0.0012959086,0.23083125,0.19032966,0.00016347897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026449312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031547109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009135611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002123823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018608784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030561626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980332991","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2019.1658447","title":"The place of responsibility in tort liability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Liability; Law; Business; Law and economics; Strict liability; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01722289274259608,"score_gpt":0.3918854189141845,"score_spread":0.3746625261715884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980332991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07843847,0.0042733257,0.03477818,0.4342651,0.0018966881,0.000033752694,0.000053523705,0.000047881567,0.44621304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814949,0.0009643573,0.0016369061,0.0063889073,0.00061622343,0.000025300482,0.0000067062306,0.000030211599,0.008836419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901411,0.00573767,0.00023153992,0.0010408327,0.001720767,0.0011279798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989999,0.0061543803,0.00080133986,0.00083855086,0.0011111294,0.001095589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011284855,0.0004314057,0.0005282802,0.0013414576,0.0075245136,0.009689029,0.001594596,0.0070820795,0.005102369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021629203,0.00046293376,0.00048930437,0.000735664,0.070297696,0.018359426,0.0061549693,0.010194619,0.00091832964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008547046,0.000010797906,0.00025441355,0.000008107675,0.00000206188,0.000035823883,0.0028935026,0.00010026898,0.00004379567,0.992853,0.0012288506,0.0025608258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012503964,0.000017349079,0.0003777435,0.00006914225,0.000004918648,0.000052706047,0.003351127,0.00031229013,0.00010263243,0.97989184,0.015796872,0.000010877814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057698726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041092383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011284855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005691104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005725825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05968076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981421646","doi":"10.1111/jols.12188","title":"Cause Lawyers, Political Violence, and Professionalism in Conflict","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Legitimation; Politics; Authoritarianism; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political science; Law; Legal profession; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06107308592062757,"score_gpt":0.4206858060744832,"score_spread":0.3596127201538556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981421646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6503946,0.0060699685,0.010384903,0.096187375,0.0003898361,0.000059331243,0.00001283346,0.000056413828,0.23644477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99640405,0.00029416772,0.0002546562,0.0009754357,0.000047644124,0.000011867072,0.00000271601,0.000010018708,0.0019994467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97403926,0.018642204,0.00042092576,0.0010401581,0.0025372668,0.0033202206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97161555,0.019597132,0.003147678,0.0007477157,0.0011119071,0.0037800316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011961127,0.00023238818,0.00053616497,0.002307146,0.025175788,0.015964694,0.0014193469,0.0056968653,0.0036844257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02695711,0.000440567,0.0002645479,0.0014945775,0.07827496,0.009624117,0.016502857,0.008708939,0.00027997972],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016048767,0.00006610663,0.004422929,0.00004729535,0.00000388472,0.0004556557,0.71190757,0.0000976674,0.00012496974,0.27166638,0.001923697,0.009267896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000286497,0.000055730383,0.005489235,0.00026135094,0.0000063125226,0.0010669032,0.7209119,0.00041213707,0.00021771269,0.17986974,0.0916463,0.0000340258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072817663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008172292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025175788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009977389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010308529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07239133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981598777","doi":"","title":"Why Couldn’t You Just Keep Your Knees Together? L’obligation déontologique des juges face aux victimes de violences sexuelles (The Ethics of Judging Sexual Assault Cases)","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Obligation; Relevance (law); Law; Statement (logic); Mythology; Sexual assault; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.10826859524913385,"score_gpt":0.43006578195797607,"score_spread":0.3217971867088422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981598777","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1566688,0.027869245,0.010743809,0.44270676,0.006253539,0.00036150846,0.0001687065,0.00005687963,0.35517073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94726205,0.0064725913,0.002080245,0.011058866,0.0026947716,0.00014914705,0.000027759266,0.000025239257,0.030229393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215007,0.0050303307,0.00048707606,0.000370161,0.0011630451,0.00079933996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99040717,0.0072479313,0.0007315252,0.0002014998,0.0010386202,0.00037321198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008359711,0.00030079295,0.00033709532,0.0007688946,0.005513801,0.0060817087,0.0011806418,0.007595712,0.0031375324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016836846,0.0005542324,0.00030676613,0.0005553198,0.010316938,0.0027597344,0.0021778576,0.005904975,0.00061943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040652107,0.000049422844,0.0032052468,0.00029569384,0.000010308217,0.005959925,0.034634776,0.00036960462,0.0007235934,0.8538152,0.08196211,0.018933428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041164305,0.000133943,0.01767283,0.0015181083,0.000026678386,0.0074759615,0.07066983,0.0024820387,0.0013815786,0.22280045,0.6756766,0.00012077039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026119515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032216366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026119515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048959972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040875264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051935017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981722395","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2019.1667083","title":"Perils, pitfalls and possibilities: introducing reflective practice effectively in legal education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective practice; Transformative learning; Praxis; Reflection (computer programming); Lifelong learning; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Professional development; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.014808671205297972,"score_gpt":0.3753946938249983,"score_spread":0.3605860226197003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981722395","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07099396,0.042850845,0.28328797,0.48633966,0.005124225,0.0013738851,0.00002253875,0.001153852,0.108853154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6670601,0.020267278,0.25880194,0.038043153,0.0015689543,0.0023144286,0.00001926341,0.00043704308,0.011487981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6933254,0.26788482,0.006494305,0.0046523646,0.023330154,0.0043129167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.728514,0.2316165,0.010191575,0.015039983,0.009592349,0.0050455583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16014099,0.0016307484,0.0011666152,0.004799053,0.014146759,0.0296782,0.0045622205,0.011949349,0.0026393775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16520965,0.0016858373,0.0019342611,0.002666895,0.09502207,0.0470956,0.032983862,0.029679503,0.0011960828],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011262263,0.00040974971,0.0028733467,0.002497213,0.00006132145,0.0014893198,0.27704167,0.00092287903,0.0012583543,0.54319304,0.008511254,0.16162916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001612854,0.00075607764,0.0017448633,0.012120835,0.00009121276,0.00608298,0.21454477,0.005206029,0.0026062261,0.53921884,0.21712992,0.00033702684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020115394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030807091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16014099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008934728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020320447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8469166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982079010","doi":"","title":"Book Review: The Great Juristic Bazaar: Jurists","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bazaar; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02639164592830234,"score_gpt":0.35850178302131475,"score_spread":0.3321101370930124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982079010","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026214795,0.5079103,0.00036212214,0.29058424,0.13912793,0.00005468426,0.000232673,0.000086771426,0.06137918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057131373,0.3227051,0.00047881698,0.14076082,0.16860609,0.00013881116,0.0003680619,0.00020566372,0.36102358],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854577,0.00037364825,0.00008519958,0.00017338002,0.0007068202,0.00011516756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381775,0.0032026991,0.00034539588,0.00021782081,0.0018434154,0.0005729837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016570931,0.00085701986,0.0013907778,0.00449508,0.0022695507,0.0053954753,0.0015691709,0.007929066,0.037751034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009608671,0.0007413518,0.0004835586,0.0054600923,0.002943185,0.0043340055,0.0019865686,0.0068630795,0.016946739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017471059,0.0000022848049,0.000011833033,0.000084238745,0.0000012708285,0.000007414172,0.000019417566,0.000010196481,0.000008665038,0.001324533,0.992401,0.0061274064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003858206,0.000003289275,0.00012800627,0.00037235755,0.0000031798636,0.000039870145,0.00003565943,0.000010893615,0.000009529385,0.0012514462,0.9981384,0.000003385464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010254374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046098292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037751034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051889424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006480184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12628984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982127033","doi":"","title":"The Great Canadian Lawyer: A Manifesto, eh?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03381337132020174,"score_gpt":0.32592880943586666,"score_spread":0.2921154381156649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982127033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016014624,0.01928492,0.00095302885,0.29322726,0.0038607775,0.000107535496,0.0015821346,0.00016381871,0.6648058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47890264,0.015538663,0.002181199,0.048911013,0.0011964014,0.00012742485,0.0008071591,0.00029569553,0.45203975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946883,0.0006676845,0.000091212794,0.00036629994,0.002665721,0.0015208804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935474,0.0014621388,0.00017337869,0.0002808404,0.002106695,0.0024295663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004563388,0.0005001365,0.000304794,0.001817848,0.022744631,0.01870845,0.0017786802,0.004829536,0.013899935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009204702,0.00035857267,0.00019790059,0.0048379977,0.015929598,0.0037435011,0.004448297,0.0052112783,0.00118741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001658726,0.000018508503,0.0009269162,0.00015684978,0.0000051248053,0.00022866463,0.027518073,0.000097018325,0.00034165467,0.3778703,0.5584482,0.03437212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049525333,0.000003896433,0.0023931277,0.00016915839,0.000005015416,0.00003661682,0.013979666,0.00004253394,0.000110231136,0.004883209,0.9783456,0.000025987632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97761613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89963233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10036765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19703473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983158694","doi":"10.1177/1743872119886235","title":"Law and Humanities: A Field Without a Canon","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Scholarship; Humanities; Discipline; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Law; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0355903174241701,"score_gpt":0.31738393941470394,"score_spread":0.2817936219905338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983158694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008599584,0.058771838,0.004007113,0.71034056,0.030884951,0.00008104547,0.000079202495,0.0001009089,0.18713473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41964298,0.06611198,0.0045026224,0.33711857,0.041178983,0.00024073887,0.00012077356,0.00032428835,0.13075906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903859,0.0054462673,0.00017563069,0.00084202294,0.0022473247,0.00090283074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866484,0.008782657,0.00042055777,0.0004117577,0.0026447622,0.0010917883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035274636,0.00047935435,0.00077778765,0.0020803479,0.018358003,0.014893604,0.0015509157,0.008185242,0.004004127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009058696,0.00028509388,0.00032395864,0.0017835245,0.035351615,0.008417753,0.0027977605,0.009320041,0.0011203373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028637101,0.000020120375,0.00037335916,0.00033461314,0.0000055677533,0.0003370536,0.042430818,0.00013900387,0.0002951454,0.71207875,0.22216158,0.021795336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005613767,0.000016596267,0.0004879526,0.0010210164,0.0000049884898,0.00016810493,0.042618167,0.00016253666,0.00010296747,0.04898996,0.9064026,0.000019578001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2152279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3528313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2152279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019066598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029055344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42795026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985017477","doi":"","title":"When Can a Canadian Judge Change Her or His Decision","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.08216986121150839,"score_gpt":0.31386532348790624,"score_spread":0.23169546227639787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985017477","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003527948,0.0045783287,0.002418716,0.54035836,0.020010602,0.00045214142,0.00047409008,0.00030100587,0.4278787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12162631,0.007382789,0.0096573755,0.5032204,0.008800402,0.00038813322,0.0005098739,0.00047288614,0.34794194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709547,0.0029324077,0.0013791922,0.0022436534,0.014673222,0.0078167785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692551,0.0026021893,0.00045833527,0.001044325,0.018302072,0.00833798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013877312,0.00057971367,0.0011855938,0.0022291627,0.018583637,0.015299513,0.0048786667,0.022752004,0.037417684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061633565,0.0010390284,0.0014985465,0.0019582869,0.008490392,0.005607744,0.0036463593,0.01781505,0.013253862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005259205,0.000036161124,0.001100048,0.00009730013,0.00003363786,0.0012470051,0.001080524,0.00018554326,0.00040670056,0.057826634,0.90227425,0.03565964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003951929,0.000015198688,0.0009767631,0.00027381902,0.000032519867,0.00023452431,0.0014138764,0.00029302598,0.0002857768,0.007912181,0.98836845,0.00015440943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8534276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9342278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14657241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057718124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1797544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41877627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988676834","doi":"","title":"The Ethics of Educational Research","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Educational Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Plea; Ethical code; Educational research; Meta-ethics; Accountability; Research ethics; Social research; Nursing ethics; Law; Social science; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.3709408605226354,"score_gpt":0.5785291975150079,"score_spread":0.20758833699237245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988676834","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012305224,0.06557587,0.057687946,0.5059353,0.01157874,0.0013063188,0.0012722418,0.00052084913,0.35489228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17680056,0.11104813,0.15737192,0.25795987,0.0310187,0.010470884,0.003106808,0.0013338986,0.25088927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7524128,0.18242621,0.011263691,0.00946306,0.04043103,0.0040032445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75264287,0.1720348,0.008136844,0.034317575,0.0254193,0.0074486453],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10265591,0.0013641457,0.0027646034,0.0040684603,0.006372196,0.021840995,0.0036614463,0.0149627505,0.014340091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14311391,0.0015827859,0.0008425067,0.005901975,0.0505576,0.011718655,0.009859338,0.02101301,0.016360374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022230646,0.00003307155,0.00020770909,0.0005256126,0.000018531757,0.00011225378,0.0050139287,0.00021115357,0.00013725396,0.7656847,0.1850711,0.042962547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009883667,0.000020882579,0.00021868618,0.0023707754,0.0000055637584,0.00014705071,0.0012287778,0.00013024916,0.00006257134,0.23537655,0.76040363,0.000025329999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041085924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035043908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8973441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009121865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037786126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5429028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989159063","doi":"","title":"Teaching the common law in Quebec: reflections on the proliferation of separate, suppletive degree programs","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Degree (music); Law; Political science; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.07156044506488321,"score_gpt":0.3376798521883494,"score_spread":0.26611940712346616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989159063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37494984,0.011692418,0.004692747,0.21586944,0.0016991838,0.0002054668,0.0003310563,0.00018465014,0.39037523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79350454,0.0029173363,0.0018832523,0.013872162,0.00014020826,0.00007565796,0.00014958804,0.00006977865,0.18738751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590105,0.0009934402,0.000061986444,0.0003532503,0.0012192982,0.0014710448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99238366,0.0023016925,0.000298421,0.00024117161,0.0021908754,0.0025842409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032889333,0.00031625354,0.0003352811,0.0010810096,0.020094533,0.0066872137,0.0021935876,0.0033622126,0.009764672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060484796,0.00036365644,0.0003542708,0.0021207964,0.0078242645,0.002640726,0.003718119,0.006068686,0.00037112104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008841006,0.0002987785,0.0105072465,0.00029305494,0.000022769398,0.0019278012,0.14672038,0.0014274438,0.0034268307,0.42109823,0.19544366,0.21874546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059630598,0.00012637915,0.043287504,0.00038439652,0.000024840052,0.00043412045,0.070406064,0.0015262833,0.0008347462,0.0066704303,0.876168,0.00007757592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9840029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89051926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10948071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11896604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79434186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989917148","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Legal System: An Introduction for Regulated Professions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal profession; Action (physics); Context (archaeology); Public law; Philosophy of law; Legal research; Geography; Physics","score_opus":0.023652325223906888,"score_gpt":0.3293184005324154,"score_spread":0.30566607530850853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989917148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059990576,0.12234655,0.013319481,0.12966625,0.011575353,0.0004253267,0.0021035057,0.00029220904,0.7142722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22375302,0.2486525,0.03329121,0.048051737,0.009268254,0.0009644731,0.0022703563,0.00061533385,0.4331331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963737,0.0006277828,0.000121678626,0.00033884338,0.0015603617,0.0009776104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997291,0.00054191856,0.00010561263,0.000074330375,0.0014204558,0.0005666928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028430289,0.0018832101,0.00084244204,0.012168566,0.02246967,0.0126419775,0.0025280074,0.006346702,0.019257696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037442124,0.0007791162,0.00095991377,0.012814926,0.016999137,0.005845614,0.0032630512,0.0070685693,0.002686296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009669934,0.00003153978,0.0008011766,0.00020090405,0.0000038498574,0.00023160636,0.0044917488,0.00084192783,0.00017922482,0.81391954,0.15060347,0.028685253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023912903,0.0000087219705,0.0019241642,0.0002873374,0.000002690657,0.000080146485,0.002141708,0.0003566359,0.000031229483,0.019505357,0.9756252,0.00003440223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9755837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9841134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80229425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19770573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14686826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93054765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994294823","doi":"10.7202/1068735ar","title":"The Paradox of Elite Law Schools in India—A comparison with Canadian Legal Education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Legal research; Socratic method; Internship; Empirical legal studies; Memorization; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics education; Psychology","score_opus":0.021171231588821792,"score_gpt":0.32466099179128294,"score_spread":0.30348976020246116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994294823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78897107,0.002115603,0.00020875574,0.020184185,0.00010153432,0.000058307818,0.0007553757,0.00008976332,0.18751538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453014,0.0006032356,0.00008590718,0.00093884475,0.000014715514,0.0000121840085,0.00015767604,0.0000148728395,0.0036424168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922692,0.00048120265,0.00019707973,0.00052930374,0.0023148216,0.004208479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887855,0.0014142524,0.0012454648,0.00046082222,0.004308624,0.0037854398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023223602,0.00026005824,0.00046065944,0.009766368,0.021241954,0.010969376,0.0026847788,0.0012680758,0.00730404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066573205,0.00041091535,0.00052355434,0.018618628,0.007980955,0.002089271,0.006154138,0.0027805455,0.0003682772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050225825,0.00046902624,0.27263236,0.0007135593,0.0001454047,0.0026558072,0.18108614,0.0008191794,0.0012931563,0.34784147,0.036390983,0.15545067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046273908,0.00009180402,0.7451553,0.00025630495,0.00008692069,0.00048142156,0.1524916,0.0004130761,0.00041360944,0.0031718633,0.0972599,0.0001319114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9723584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98680717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119324476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119324476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08124671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8657637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995813127","doi":"10.1080/09612025.2019.1702791","title":"Cornelia Sorabji (1866–1954): a pioneer woman lawyer in Britain and India","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women s History Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Opposition (politics); Colonialism; British Empire; Context (archaeology); Chose; History; War of independence; Law; Ancient history; Empire; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.028808194587834214,"score_gpt":0.3195811958192114,"score_spread":0.29077300123137717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995813127","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042397965,0.8905084,0.00008826712,0.029925732,0.0018558042,0.00003265382,0.00004919411,0.000009563744,0.03513234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32596055,0.639041,0.00022125126,0.014204444,0.0012589308,0.000050680454,0.00007216126,0.000016780916,0.01917425],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989957,0.0004082587,0.00005228622,0.000089051166,0.0002033759,0.00025131082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985007,0.0008538506,0.00017767395,0.000031428623,0.00020824553,0.00022800083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015509326,0.00024002166,0.00027585056,0.0017427797,0.0035501297,0.0026525687,0.00074449845,0.0015883452,0.0020447148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027514752,0.00035226258,0.00013905582,0.0031821174,0.0043775523,0.0011819258,0.0016004515,0.0028637282,0.00032214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002047333,0.00016860764,0.0075865956,0.014284068,0.000094960364,0.00815389,0.27765408,0.00031341033,0.002647644,0.09540744,0.15042493,0.44305965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014790511,0.00010029129,0.018571526,0.004477016,0.0000368456,0.001523098,0.03193773,0.0000103427665,0.00032186945,0.0006275779,0.9423564,0.000022482616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07845658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15387546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07845658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006707329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015542487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15599984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996465541","doi":"","title":"Making Continuous Improvement a Reality: Achieving High Performance in the Ottawa County, Michigan, Circuit and Probate Courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Probate; Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07607464022723298,"score_gpt":0.3136138013774729,"score_spread":0.23753916115023993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996465541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48710355,0.010877567,0.0013203552,0.3764879,0.0015150224,0.00031686394,0.00036020917,0.00026612123,0.12175232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491668,0.003820998,0.0024459728,0.02338391,0.00051924825,0.00021648665,0.00023340335,0.00009557994,0.020117654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863571,0.002882167,0.00045276023,0.0009134228,0.0049632606,0.0044312044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757272,0.0017226483,0.0010047113,0.00040019245,0.0037768374,0.017368298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054828464,0.00033200896,0.00022053381,0.001296925,0.028025713,0.010072889,0.0025790243,0.0036116554,0.0065000746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014331445,0.0003990497,0.00024338829,0.0020236617,0.007609473,0.0032391439,0.0073342086,0.0040561715,0.0006014715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012421233,0.0012684575,0.20486604,0.0004273341,0.000117753145,0.004572624,0.056463916,0.0012305238,0.0014990678,0.041415296,0.4699459,0.2180688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007110971,0.00057398475,0.54634094,0.0007221586,0.000071135684,0.0007853702,0.08468043,0.0013677252,0.0010477332,0.009960163,0.3540939,0.0002853033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6276763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91410846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6276763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030237956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09714592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74903274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997560070","doi":"10.52358/mm.vi2.82","title":"Formation continue obligatoire et modalités de la formation à distance destinée aux juristes","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Médiations et médiatisations","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Library science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.045804837477594736,"score_gpt":0.3814479054825421,"score_spread":0.33564306800494736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997560070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2703603,0.011377304,0.030005386,0.031876978,0.00038649,0.00016435224,0.00021831354,0.000126529,0.6554844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97323936,0.001679599,0.0023785697,0.00080261077,0.00006989159,0.00006601507,0.000043655815,0.000038750975,0.021681603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98674995,0.0047358456,0.00057650625,0.0014833967,0.004606193,0.0018481659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741871,0.015539494,0.003045304,0.0017739249,0.0036410724,0.0018130366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011283823,0.00035801914,0.00057807274,0.0027837167,0.01333534,0.014476213,0.001672727,0.00275325,0.013139802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030941442,0.00037117343,0.00051573373,0.0030926114,0.03091401,0.009872343,0.011167232,0.0053605116,0.00074041635],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018449835,0.000019779856,0.0037955383,0.00013155853,0.000012924159,0.00015411834,0.11391759,0.00012462828,0.00020358237,0.86236835,0.0013365112,0.01791701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035045297,0.00006937587,0.031409267,0.001439974,0.000075454445,0.0005912279,0.1997197,0.00089338626,0.0009564397,0.37216148,0.3925199,0.00012873445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20552182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26978227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20552182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02793826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028998762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4086511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998654919","doi":"","title":"Medically assisted suicide: Recent jurisprudence and the challenges for law reform.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Law reform; Parliament; Dignity; Political science; High Court; Assisted suicide; Economic Justice; Common law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09060180008442864,"score_gpt":0.3937852794660006,"score_spread":0.303183479381572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998654919","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013524928,0.15440722,0.00064141356,0.8223926,0.009287364,0.0000118232265,0.000015416337,0.0000119853985,0.011879763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11231786,0.1737595,0.002001311,0.6541075,0.045757566,0.000111592264,0.00006609625,0.00008894994,0.011789608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96683073,0.014815704,0.0026107214,0.003447492,0.009361474,0.0029338312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9003984,0.082618825,0.0033965397,0.002157593,0.007622078,0.0038066588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05538582,0.0006938947,0.0014495552,0.0030699435,0.014847508,0.025758058,0.005885743,0.05791775,0.0023993168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08991959,0.0014457805,0.0016982332,0.0030587413,0.08793952,0.021745864,0.008716781,0.054604825,0.00068653905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018926696,0.000044727025,0.00018515601,0.0004620362,0.000014468846,0.00032103155,0.014129087,0.00018920623,0.00009889887,0.850246,0.10498305,0.029307371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039197137,0.00005840134,0.0010231589,0.0027931451,0.000018645267,0.0005744193,0.009672286,0.00038271598,0.00010670954,0.24820192,0.7370424,0.000086926164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034874298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05075817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05791775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03052527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034426037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29291165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998893145","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v9n2p70","title":"A Comparative Study on the Legal Education Model in Saudi Arabia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Apprenticeship; Legal education; Law; Political science; Kingdom; Administration (probate law); Legal history; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.11535626037732363,"score_gpt":0.46831146454567035,"score_spread":0.3529552041683467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998893145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930508,0.00028885683,0.000053784115,0.00041269267,0.0000076716615,0.000009331512,0.000031789485,0.0000011999501,0.006143819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985489,0.00031121715,0.000048347207,0.00006729369,0.0000030686356,0.0000030855208,0.00003133825,9.0526174e-7,0.0009858316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989851,0.00033419149,0.000055860935,0.00005705305,0.00026451124,0.0003032399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977664,0.00048030293,0.00044284135,0.00007393021,0.0007178831,0.00051866384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001506056,0.00012846649,0.00015588972,0.001547701,0.0021673362,0.0019987577,0.00032649585,0.00033614153,0.005082742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003004063,0.00012579573,0.00016502845,0.0017875605,0.00086737174,0.001418755,0.0011235554,0.0005367333,0.00038108186],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024937573,0.0010137279,0.7047695,0.00025624028,0.00006517106,0.0018697652,0.14574854,0.0004044885,0.0014199397,0.041516,0.003464275,0.099222936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022479308,0.00031001878,0.5245222,0.0002519469,0.000028496075,0.0008808558,0.42844763,0.0010069268,0.00055657973,0.00084387173,0.043103047,0.00002589495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05564527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07553338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05564527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045210673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033593187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11064273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999836414","doi":"10.11575/prism/32471","title":"Juror Stress Debriefing: A Review of the Literature and an Evaluation of a Yukon Program","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debriefing; Psychology; Stress (linguistics); Applied psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3149855873354872,"score_gpt":0.5791632817035828,"score_spread":0.2641776943680956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999836414","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09373253,0.89561933,0.0007184053,0.0041038725,0.0004941263,0.0011881551,0.00029516208,0.000036750353,0.0038116192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26568016,0.72531277,0.004517075,0.0015972158,0.0001444075,0.0017744447,0.00034835347,0.000038126454,0.00058738195],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97142255,0.015880592,0.0056134528,0.0011169002,0.0052077584,0.00075876457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9170404,0.04822799,0.007350987,0.0018356387,0.023985108,0.0015598971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034158215,0.00071476947,0.0023220808,0.0068191215,0.0035392884,0.004739656,0.0035650865,0.0021059397,0.002536706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075939514,0.00092553435,0.0014110873,0.013195331,0.0033914866,0.003128454,0.0027167185,0.0021181158,0.00046199237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019158265,0.0015248036,0.013368497,0.13964713,0.0012147117,0.00022707375,0.012824188,0.00022135272,0.00063384726,0.0017817335,0.004244832,0.82239586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018493065,0.009106128,0.24872918,0.47977436,0.008679954,0.0016718983,0.11135099,0.0011814721,0.002115907,0.0011859763,0.13387418,0.00048067808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12728302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3843162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87271696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026749915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062236514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25308436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001318696","doi":"","title":"Court of Appeal for Ontario","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Alphascript Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0657621426225248,"score_gpt":0.3413164617336619,"score_spread":0.27555431911113715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001318696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057973377,0.0019022088,0.0002857249,0.07735916,0.0034425056,0.00056755403,0.0028021652,0.00020817261,0.90763503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008349815,0.0004575781,0.00011251494,0.03417098,0.00046134202,0.00024308488,0.00023514936,0.00007058459,0.9558989],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954668,0.00018482977,0.000118606775,0.00056107686,0.0017079725,0.0019606743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971814,0.00080077787,0.0000731853,0.00016387047,0.001269028,0.00051174546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001792329,0.001320489,0.0018853229,0.0020750673,0.026994856,0.009035142,0.0032830252,0.037047908,0.12550816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008438515,0.002071634,0.0022824795,0.0022309474,0.0027320152,0.0023239607,0.0027326334,0.016894104,0.024520993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010566445,0.000055216282,0.00092352787,0.00008365285,0.000034171364,0.00085872447,0.0007967202,0.000120133365,0.00023040181,0.056043044,0.933468,0.007280793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009384842,0.000018276367,0.0028843968,0.00018332638,0.000054057284,0.00010831379,0.0007960548,0.00022026604,0.00015668792,0.005457567,0.9899721,0.000055195742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8776996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96466273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12550816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04299671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08939333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41986662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002787460","doi":"10.17635/lancaster/thesis/826","title":"A Bernsteinian analysis of the interplay between legal knowledge and the legal professional in university law schools in Yorkshire and Alberta","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University of Lancaster","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Legal research; Legal education; Legal profession; Law; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Legal history; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.01632383217721077,"score_gpt":0.3216088700466389,"score_spread":0.3052850378694281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002787460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7476341,0.0036460184,0.0023893358,0.011507661,0.00009158508,0.00012083434,0.000196126,0.000031809886,0.23438248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860968,0.0008918957,0.0006965321,0.00022994087,0.000009060324,0.000023875557,0.00004414001,0.00001029385,0.011997408],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996228,0.0011206067,0.00007748182,0.00037614602,0.0009717688,0.0012259955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99258983,0.004133588,0.0003859527,0.00018220948,0.001795666,0.0009126749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027838424,0.00021154704,0.00038343764,0.0041197464,0.0156003125,0.01016211,0.002104388,0.00133646,0.006770261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006893195,0.0003622408,0.00016036513,0.0071331,0.023179492,0.0028826417,0.004665873,0.001853443,0.00023561248],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008650375,0.00005098214,0.025013307,0.0002110362,0.000011216243,0.0022841434,0.5269228,0.0008465148,0.0008035601,0.39997214,0.007120479,0.03667733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014813053,0.000035097037,0.06509431,0.00045245342,0.00002513044,0.0003840019,0.78526616,0.0012408833,0.0004968219,0.017104348,0.1298241,0.000061907806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9746302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.986083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12508482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12508482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070076264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90755814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004382415","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i1.5968","title":"Access to Legal Education","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.033139406781002884,"score_gpt":0.3528028254099387,"score_spread":0.31966341862893577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004382415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01975173,0.008104568,0.0012863831,0.10013616,0.0008749403,0.000046004323,0.00015998149,0.00004809896,0.8695921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57691336,0.0071581015,0.001033,0.022867922,0.0016834394,0.00009160573,0.00017411655,0.00004029563,0.3900382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954177,0.0013574167,0.00010269489,0.00041459498,0.0012018937,0.0015056876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905098,0.0025518772,0.00053153915,0.0006136999,0.0013091408,0.00448384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025915834,0.0001383501,0.00024718032,0.0013331604,0.002877664,0.0051937243,0.00077778875,0.0041510565,0.11504469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014950581,0.00017460175,0.0003125282,0.0010009382,0.0032957979,0.0059929937,0.008191562,0.0029302628,0.0048428425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000328087,0.0001974676,0.0030253355,0.00018574884,0.0000085344855,0.0002639749,0.003862884,0.00015009669,0.0002492114,0.7487118,0.08976413,0.15354793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023720544,0.00006513853,0.006797204,0.0005685123,0.000006006462,0.00019669064,0.0022232193,0.0001876905,0.00015219061,0.07709003,0.9126768,0.000012711534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018832527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04084797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11504469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057845204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012286711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38486278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004626288","doi":"10.3968/11328","title":"A Study of the Supply-side Reform of Clinical Legal Education: From the Perspective of Fostering Outstanding Legal Talents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thriving; Legal education; Perspective (graphical); Curriculum; Engineering ethics; Supply side; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Business; Social science; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12845326987427225,"score_gpt":0.5026279948899329,"score_spread":0.3741747250156607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004626288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37795717,0.0031652844,0.024152316,0.28921112,0.0006142328,0.00030435552,0.00003425056,0.00008406531,0.30447724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871793,0.0006127483,0.0020847076,0.003674448,0.00020717109,0.00008792185,0.0000066783227,0.000012457086,0.0061345873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98412645,0.012305486,0.00022847299,0.0005186901,0.0014520244,0.0013689365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699258,0.019209882,0.0039728344,0.0014606796,0.0025088545,0.0029219775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01158014,0.00016411721,0.0003178756,0.0011099529,0.0056382664,0.011571422,0.0010245059,0.0036206066,0.004047868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031658694,0.00029052346,0.00025195864,0.0014833792,0.027691992,0.009441729,0.0064221974,0.004208744,0.00030436684],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021959042,0.00026704586,0.0038297104,0.00010470639,0.000005362928,0.00018246548,0.03614356,0.0006263241,0.00030046114,0.9323374,0.0036745188,0.022506312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019335914,0.0006567189,0.024947353,0.00082791795,0.000033490123,0.00047021036,0.18419828,0.009783656,0.0025682996,0.61208594,0.16416548,0.00006935881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030176353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004033905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0126068685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0126068685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01999683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091469705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005580030","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Michel Proulx and David Layton,","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01978743567028208,"score_gpt":0.3477006087598151,"score_spread":0.32791317308953305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005580030","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014279467,0.865377,0.0005315863,0.045564774,0.03746055,0.00014725498,0.0007273328,0.00017266264,0.04987608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015134099,0.5965816,0.0012832611,0.05065941,0.019919137,0.00032214294,0.001483623,0.00017841147,0.328059],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990227,0.0001184693,0.00006496846,0.00013799586,0.00059924775,0.000056475732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973252,0.0008475698,0.00022086607,0.00006669548,0.0012151828,0.0003244345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011062546,0.0012762187,0.001970239,0.0031604746,0.0009000663,0.0038809779,0.0020253756,0.0029367649,0.0722434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063948617,0.0006373036,0.00074138114,0.0053334953,0.0008735795,0.0036026682,0.0014538115,0.003921188,0.06774074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005375697,0.000004246885,0.000015611107,0.00060088054,0.0000044481853,0.000015595482,0.000024741039,0.000015158651,0.00002975563,0.00038219107,0.973436,0.025466032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057895477,0.0000060401385,0.00010640969,0.00062366,0.000006097418,0.00010847502,0.000023050752,0.0000075075022,0.000014284257,0.00022756809,0.9988663,0.0000046611494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005842267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015853766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0722434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019141493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040055783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24167824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008417484","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v13n1p143","title":"Transformation of Legal Education in Indonesia Based on Social Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Legal education; Legal profession; Curriculum; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Legal psychology; Political science; Legal process; Empowerment; Economic Justice; Law; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04260177958225985,"score_gpt":0.3832755048507342,"score_spread":0.34067372526847434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008417484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48721644,0.0015577198,0.0027287323,0.032449987,0.00039165365,0.00024165038,0.000043308137,0.000098341414,0.4752723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97249484,0.00054672814,0.0016528097,0.0014321859,0.0000330448,0.000033195145,0.000018738914,0.000017172526,0.023771288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989221,0.00034580487,0.00005184578,0.000086550615,0.00024470236,0.0003490048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928063,0.0000833177,0.00011494772,0.00003191703,0.00009405741,0.00039510662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009223546,0.00011469688,0.00011746165,0.00043820406,0.0029806276,0.0037345898,0.00040444869,0.0006514821,0.004965858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010640763,0.00013370096,0.00017698866,0.00036615646,0.0025218453,0.001429469,0.0031860538,0.0021977143,0.0004682379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007552536,0.0018826382,0.041907202,0.0003632694,0.000016557748,0.004441542,0.079196066,0.0012880327,0.006667226,0.4679488,0.024155824,0.3720573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058201695,0.00034450277,0.19465587,0.00073810114,0.00001760274,0.0015479897,0.08996474,0.003977404,0.004867646,0.06900925,0.6347509,0.000067860106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073876334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016249195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073876334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00456676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010351687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03313428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008536437","doi":"","title":"Practising As a Lawyer in a Partnership and Multidisciplinary Practice in Québec: Progress and Prospects (L’exercice de la profession d’avocat en société et en multidisciplinarité au Québec : bilan et perspectives)","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Negotiation; Political science; Legal profession; Sociology; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01950088354013265,"score_gpt":0.4427060104134434,"score_spread":0.42320512687331074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008536437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91418976,0.01064855,0.0009426673,0.040719412,0.00014090774,0.00007970039,0.00030810325,0.00003760886,0.032933276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98410267,0.0019350417,0.00047280296,0.0011541958,0.000019626623,0.000019341716,0.000077805336,0.000006457364,0.012212224],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971827,0.0009042289,0.00005961182,0.00026077603,0.0006447188,0.0009480261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98777616,0.00227482,0.0013773792,0.0002247905,0.0020699846,0.006276878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033250803,0.00015718846,0.0002497011,0.0011314728,0.008048534,0.004581367,0.0013997896,0.0015338697,0.008396763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061080814,0.00020259772,0.00020374727,0.002319591,0.0038236808,0.002072538,0.0024316865,0.0018844994,0.00047033053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002727047,0.0009787678,0.3180789,0.0005222791,0.00007091614,0.0019140614,0.18355763,0.0010953769,0.0017808545,0.040945347,0.04360301,0.40718013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004366845,0.0002473998,0.70256907,0.0007383176,0.000028005437,0.00037419188,0.1734724,0.0018633772,0.00036163305,0.0012214944,0.11899943,0.000080932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9377384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062261607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09874513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4517417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008604145","doi":"10.7202/1068151ar","title":"Kenneth Einar Himma, \"Morality and the Nature of Law.\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11282342903362652,"score_gpt":0.4203342383472259,"score_spread":0.30751080931359936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008604145","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041519353,0.5831482,0.0011093388,0.39513776,0.010623294,0.000042996428,0.0003745788,0.00006984376,0.009078781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019232979,0.5282905,0.0036340444,0.40895846,0.020894311,0.0003329832,0.00034287767,0.000092667724,0.01822112],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894298,0.003919814,0.00094931223,0.00074813346,0.004515249,0.00043787062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968548,0.024626095,0.0015918046,0.0005623786,0.004039752,0.0006319777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010321784,0.0010817106,0.0009835019,0.0042390726,0.0024525658,0.005521988,0.0029248358,0.01112164,0.0045725014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03815179,0.00089704746,0.0008595405,0.005353512,0.005363052,0.011299304,0.002380366,0.009002718,0.0033161477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043613643,0.000027544187,0.0003394353,0.0012333142,0.000037674334,0.00011465566,0.0011019289,0.000116394825,0.00015407636,0.05853281,0.9149782,0.02332027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078862904,0.000027786056,0.0038052108,0.0033925164,0.00006290804,0.00021627494,0.0010923265,0.00022089548,0.00068238017,0.11798231,0.87237537,0.00006314684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022676067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052509565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022676067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041724034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008365206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054587424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008931395","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3537883","title":"Banking on the Lawyers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Accounting; Business; Face (sociological concept); Risk management; Principal (computer security); Value (mathematics); Independence (probability theory); Quality (philosophy); Bank regulation; Financial crisis; Public relations; Finance; Political science; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.049122372740545546,"score_gpt":0.34669967848754984,"score_spread":0.2975773057470043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008931395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039924346,0.0039701336,0.00076546724,0.3075619,0.00246114,0.000041470623,0.00010031667,0.00007655103,0.6450986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4165875,0.0032893827,0.00042615196,0.07165441,0.0021319732,0.00003668966,0.000051271618,0.00006648317,0.50575614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968239,0.00093295594,0.00009177917,0.00040322437,0.0008270034,0.00092110055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947988,0.0016848503,0.00046835555,0.0004428765,0.001407488,0.0011976154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020566306,0.00027433224,0.0005319024,0.0010504308,0.009886527,0.011504489,0.00070324994,0.008621357,0.08646458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014910347,0.00040867296,0.00032385674,0.00078179286,0.0049534,0.005713579,0.0039327876,0.00980865,0.010863753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017956717,0.00018752016,0.004952081,0.00008739559,0.000016910282,0.0008243792,0.0039824513,0.00015175082,0.00073594385,0.52031547,0.38083556,0.087730974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052601223,0.00010543482,0.007491894,0.0004138569,0.000024281086,0.00048297553,0.0059250984,0.0004936701,0.0012478371,0.119096704,0.8646192,0.00004642046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009166019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017242204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08646458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004875841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008134632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28925288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010815349","doi":"","title":"Removing a \"Section 96\" Judge:An Historical Case Study","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Legal history; International law; Political science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.059065879564704014,"score_gpt":0.37600146429289255,"score_spread":0.31693558472818856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010815349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70653564,0.0024094733,0.0027769865,0.061265215,0.0009352031,0.0002352907,0.0002950475,0.000062491075,0.22548464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8906403,0.0027741771,0.0015396097,0.03294467,0.000514812,0.00013336218,0.00014282738,0.00009496896,0.07121531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941215,0.0019055809,0.00019705502,0.00071613194,0.0009678856,0.0020918315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98712665,0.008501115,0.0011935822,0.00050559576,0.0008823344,0.0017907063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008481862,0.00066443183,0.0006188561,0.0028198909,0.051441777,0.0065190336,0.00476675,0.02323725,0.010838194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025703287,0.0011182214,0.000578926,0.003465549,0.012580274,0.00470487,0.00531679,0.02748912,0.0013856865],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040887584,0.00232197,0.042475644,0.0004007347,0.000105013256,0.1372873,0.2562905,0.0019781827,0.0018776631,0.3546868,0.13398801,0.06817933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017038903,0.00084167084,0.033548303,0.0013877634,0.00028109658,0.035257112,0.38012418,0.0017172687,0.0050603785,0.031671606,0.50952214,0.00041810557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11435536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3169857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8856446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010653497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009574667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22737944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010912969","doi":"10.1093/jpo/joaa006","title":"Inside the ‘Red Circle’: the production of China’s corporate legal elite","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Professions and Organization","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Production (economics); China; Globalization; Beijing; Political science; Work (physics); Economics; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04754597601569579,"score_gpt":0.3334801974070471,"score_spread":0.28593422139135133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010912969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997015,0.0000540221,0.000060613693,0.00007511278,0.0000024622307,0.000008306123,0.000018890476,0.0000021723247,0.0027633887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908996,0.000031685107,0.000034766676,0.000014496294,0.0000035752819,0.0000024077017,0.000018027584,0.0000015492617,0.0008035488],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910504,0.00017795197,0.00003366589,0.00012052217,0.00022236592,0.00034041057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979563,0.00033467868,0.0005585737,0.00015671212,0.00028717009,0.0007065435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016179117,0.00014731991,0.00028952418,0.0036999583,0.0033208905,0.0029937197,0.0005091866,0.00032735922,0.0058535673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002427885,0.00014226722,0.000106481355,0.0028569892,0.002319078,0.0013935242,0.0027891558,0.0003457489,0.0002906379],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116975556,0.00008054692,0.78164274,0.000070506845,0.000023689989,0.00162644,0.14018667,0.00010281849,0.0035184284,0.0076915207,0.0012896156,0.06365012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059062722,0.00007187111,0.9268318,0.000033192682,0.000010996887,0.00017852697,0.06347777,0.00050332485,0.0005294899,0.0009740435,0.007368028,0.000015144227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0190166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028538585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0190166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022832768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017000441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037811816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011341383","doi":"","title":"Reconceptualizing Professional Responsibility:Incorporating Equality","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.11993809460788485,"score_gpt":0.4005033235033196,"score_spread":0.2805652288954347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011341383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06225744,0.0014657958,0.35989943,0.13490759,0.00097106124,0.00024579754,0.00004758209,0.00030553233,0.43989968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9381694,0.0003210254,0.047160015,0.0036049034,0.00015951127,0.00013733459,0.000020934103,0.00009975318,0.010327192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95792615,0.028046984,0.0011303893,0.0032005878,0.005995902,0.0037000661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96229416,0.018434437,0.002562575,0.007234416,0.0053712158,0.0041031097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039362576,0.00068538357,0.0008004187,0.0024333608,0.010326764,0.01553025,0.004092345,0.0073576407,0.006716932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0615263,0.0007944987,0.0008372315,0.0011158123,0.04160312,0.018905027,0.019772438,0.006984359,0.00081428443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001529833,0.000092806986,0.0009973886,0.00006414247,0.000019444145,0.00007579166,0.023792135,0.001461399,0.00017934966,0.93539363,0.003884885,0.034023754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022968548,0.000029246035,0.000611529,0.00016569355,0.000020660746,0.000055917233,0.0072273584,0.0022630016,0.00041686432,0.9505831,0.03857257,0.000031120693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013551959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017556254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039362576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010776136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040917553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20817173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012108012","doi":"","title":"The Best Things in Law are Free?:Towards Quality Free Public Accessto Primary Legal Materials in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Quality (philosophy); Legal history; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04655171573101667,"score_gpt":0.338016501545715,"score_spread":0.2914647858146983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012108012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6052837,0.004564317,0.006784119,0.15201817,0.0005188628,0.0013620158,0.002328974,0.00050051085,0.22663933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87638533,0.0020511474,0.006998175,0.01309183,0.00007865476,0.00022033433,0.0005484176,0.0001550361,0.10047101],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98427606,0.0010755669,0.00039955392,0.0008396975,0.007827487,0.005581578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9705156,0.0033690277,0.0010869687,0.00096574076,0.013400491,0.010662148],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007117529,0.0002953494,0.00051986723,0.0033417076,0.023252288,0.01305283,0.004169894,0.005109702,0.024462964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025758442,0.0010038773,0.00077472074,0.004234375,0.006280744,0.00473549,0.00792893,0.0051128175,0.0011768944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029688925,0.0015274206,0.1130722,0.0011316228,0.00007887688,0.0021684216,0.05906938,0.0040380284,0.0031080793,0.22359495,0.24058333,0.35133076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023146498,0.0003129325,0.32634646,0.0012836888,0.00014852466,0.00079948915,0.06279495,0.008834866,0.004023139,0.021021916,0.5737442,0.0004584152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99890363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15942462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45553195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9749483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012153310","doi":"","title":"Canadian Graduate Legal Education: Past, Present and Future","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.02614164991244955,"score_gpt":0.322737240031135,"score_spread":0.29659559011868547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012153310","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08716102,0.04827948,0.00087166415,0.58368474,0.0018891203,0.00007754446,0.0010416806,0.00016270325,0.27683213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87338847,0.05249181,0.0028816208,0.024245141,0.0006539848,0.000048733596,0.0005165915,0.000043818534,0.045729883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944765,0.0005128536,0.00009077999,0.00031473674,0.00230112,0.0023039943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849803,0.0012944466,0.0006933793,0.00023071717,0.0055810777,0.0072201607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005179548,0.00028898835,0.000369001,0.003998973,0.015779836,0.008588534,0.0019397092,0.0029859673,0.012212342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012020317,0.00026715684,0.00032600688,0.008517603,0.008707214,0.0032336754,0.002723506,0.003907304,0.000525178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010135759,0.00015074566,0.037255637,0.0008517626,0.000023586277,0.00037864145,0.017803792,0.00041828214,0.0004680559,0.42685908,0.1926908,0.32299832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028892036,0.000075430544,0.09722132,0.0011907265,0.000036333484,0.00023945431,0.06457358,0.00066368276,0.00033618446,0.019074837,0.8164517,0.00010784193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82279986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17720015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34569594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9543312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012459786","doi":"","title":"Breach of Contract?: The New Economy, Access to Justice and theEthical Responsibilities of the Legal Profession","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Economic Justice; Law; Business; Breach of contract; Professional responsibility; Legal service; Political science; Damages","score_opus":0.06586348626266146,"score_gpt":0.38859037400642776,"score_spread":0.3227268877437663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012459786","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08601512,0.010979162,0.004509771,0.573389,0.00069595367,0.000026268835,0.00006658649,0.000021079137,0.32429716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96305037,0.0026404657,0.0008518679,0.018106515,0.00067680737,0.000054972566,0.000012116661,0.00002646805,0.0145804575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99155045,0.00445064,0.00021385522,0.0007240672,0.001251937,0.0018089695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98432964,0.010084019,0.0013553356,0.0008263919,0.0009990274,0.0024056053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015690219,0.00027679236,0.00073339255,0.0015141821,0.011529144,0.025576094,0.001796067,0.017063726,0.014683083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02446693,0.0005286013,0.0004286777,0.0019907467,0.08039072,0.031944793,0.0075482703,0.01219327,0.0008927908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015305277,0.000026260279,0.00040725194,0.00001172219,0.00000273672,0.00006559065,0.004869435,0.000055097396,0.000023882361,0.98832315,0.0030460786,0.0031534627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019332028,0.000009431225,0.0012105476,0.00012410461,0.000005594428,0.00011102483,0.011527489,0.00030414492,0.000056226607,0.9533872,0.03322084,0.000024131987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03369302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042781845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03369302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014282336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023881637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10362613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012536637","doi":"","title":"Canadian Law Teachers in the 1930s: \"When the World was TurnedUpside Down\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal education","score_opus":0.030949882436189496,"score_gpt":0.332850534060498,"score_spread":0.3019006516243085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012536637","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23726892,0.007122072,0.00044281728,0.5006586,0.0034007896,0.00011065893,0.0025516371,0.00011357196,0.24833101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73900306,0.0039377157,0.00031046983,0.054223515,0.0003847924,0.00005106227,0.00053379283,0.00010211456,0.20145349],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956061,0.00025148923,0.0000500901,0.00026014706,0.0011314098,0.0027006553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491346,0.00035136528,0.00021390365,0.000056096927,0.0020188058,0.0024462545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028853142,0.00037213642,0.00035008046,0.0021016963,0.038785398,0.008888444,0.0016325893,0.006864133,0.020086171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008821051,0.00056436507,0.00041783784,0.004056204,0.008758738,0.0036742087,0.0035843756,0.010316437,0.0011229861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015429217,0.000103472616,0.027929699,0.00016658111,0.000027072907,0.0012580649,0.2060929,0.00026925383,0.00053859595,0.10857592,0.6063672,0.048517138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000176325,0.000016877164,0.06457126,0.00022391781,0.00002338026,0.00008539756,0.12984248,0.00006935996,0.0002724143,0.0019874966,0.80280846,0.00008140078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78614837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21385165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26403314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91182065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012620828","doi":"","title":"PROTECTING THE PUBLIC INTEREST:: LAW SOCIETY DECISION-MAKING AFTER TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Public interest; Law; Public law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03166196483596456,"score_gpt":0.3385246526296871,"score_spread":0.30686268779372255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012620828","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18301809,0.0016431782,0.0036277324,0.5054617,0.0014404741,0.00037111982,0.000088384804,0.00012111271,0.30422822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.905103,0.0003977103,0.002581587,0.037030276,0.00016625303,0.00013833784,0.000029531428,0.000057538964,0.054495722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9648445,0.011917829,0.00081116345,0.0029307706,0.005832715,0.013663141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95241547,0.01680939,0.0022389544,0.0017127681,0.007943624,0.018879866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03201836,0.00034682694,0.00044354494,0.001729425,0.05460678,0.026700031,0.003786339,0.014786887,0.0150418375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057972405,0.00074488024,0.0005917828,0.0016057632,0.030421767,0.0086899,0.015613741,0.01579335,0.00083663303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009992296,0.00016657583,0.008031636,0.00010695701,0.0000331187,0.0031642888,0.11552691,0.0008519638,0.0010493135,0.7174513,0.11390777,0.039610244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006446777,0.00011695959,0.018058503,0.0006879133,0.000048515332,0.00024744234,0.19811392,0.0015609731,0.0015493351,0.11871869,0.66051,0.00032324195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75318676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8773127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24681324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12818508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2676516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93005216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013037630","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1376","title":"A Snapshot of the Law in the Streets: Reflections of a Former Parkdale Academic Director","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto","keywords":"Legal education; Sociology; Experiential learning; Law; Reflection (computer programming); Context (archaeology); Snapshot (computer storage); Political science; History","score_opus":0.12523979684065978,"score_gpt":0.4591753507229872,"score_spread":0.33393555388232743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013037630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68095505,0.0039560106,0.003026553,0.21965757,0.0022962918,0.00012936138,0.00014567685,0.00016847592,0.08966512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9385421,0.0023106632,0.001400482,0.023447009,0.00052273035,0.00006908802,0.000046877245,0.00021916398,0.033441935],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98647654,0.0098271575,0.00019235814,0.00068746833,0.0010554983,0.0017608549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912316,0.0040784455,0.00062232174,0.00028211446,0.0008306423,0.0029546951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055786897,0.0006298534,0.00096172537,0.0020098255,0.048372053,0.016101772,0.002873468,0.008162025,0.006525009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0122435065,0.0012525384,0.00051928405,0.0018591478,0.024952125,0.009486407,0.014969125,0.021692865,0.0011597577],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018839008,0.000109328525,0.0009638547,0.000042101932,0.000004648547,0.0033366666,0.96380943,0.000050845443,0.00040767386,0.007830481,0.0194079,0.0040180916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024536382,0.00002733226,0.00037440058,0.00005468822,0.0000024511871,0.00036932947,0.93405634,0.000039901624,0.00015222731,0.0005527614,0.06435729,0.000010769037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01944391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056469515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048372053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008058331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068032485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058467507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013073302","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1382","title":"Reflecting on Clinical Legal Education at the Indigenous Community Legal Clinic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal education; Political science; Legal research; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.323329263932597,"score_gpt":0.5754932380771438,"score_spread":0.25216397414454683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013073302","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.425089,0.00081812404,0.0011516633,0.50533724,0.004473008,0.00052272575,0.00006066602,0.000088494184,0.062459175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8620592,0.0011258858,0.0027604809,0.085286,0.0013749559,0.00024389822,0.000041923744,0.00013076985,0.04697684],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768099,0.011998809,0.00053969386,0.0008320876,0.0020377196,0.0077817896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94586086,0.009866524,0.0017982924,0.00088955305,0.004783621,0.036801115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015008169,0.0004758779,0.00040463018,0.0010265949,0.051532328,0.011386921,0.0039429134,0.01045444,0.024876453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0419995,0.0010456947,0.00065679115,0.00095950224,0.013064622,0.005092017,0.018654678,0.030704627,0.0019373934],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016538665,0.0024981967,0.022541888,0.00038414457,0.000049056613,0.022647895,0.7487979,0.0005562234,0.0043997075,0.013892045,0.11139459,0.072673045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041413463,0.0003178709,0.01256898,0.00039614792,0.000017678105,0.0029082643,0.85748214,0.00021923482,0.0008943257,0.003712699,0.12133238,0.000108892375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06132577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24753083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06132577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021141635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07657108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15339398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W301312037","doi":"","title":"Book Review: In Search of ‘Bora’s Head’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Wonder; History; Art history; Psychology","score_opus":0.028167655594228957,"score_gpt":0.41497918174206255,"score_spread":0.3868115261478336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W301312037","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002151236,0.72292936,0.0004284842,0.12018324,0.073581114,0.00008069774,0.0005306704,0.00024195047,0.0818094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004581869,0.49746612,0.0010291111,0.13002826,0.07081901,0.00021765796,0.000993289,0.00030888352,0.29455584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729025,0.00041120625,0.00018159066,0.0002815846,0.0016594876,0.00017596812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910641,0.0033699127,0.0007020478,0.00040040712,0.003534379,0.0009291707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019792004,0.000944931,0.0019021219,0.0036546043,0.0015576109,0.0081787575,0.0017494097,0.0045785755,0.057125423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014810851,0.00076636794,0.00055562024,0.009245924,0.0022681819,0.006602845,0.001890118,0.005490274,0.05741981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022456225,0.000002130676,0.000010569929,0.00022526883,0.0000016835979,0.000013124866,0.000026035163,0.000007762645,0.000017461287,0.00057443714,0.9905438,0.008575601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002965877,0.0000035686708,0.00008015757,0.0007109143,0.0000022802667,0.0000727121,0.00004113197,0.00000729915,0.000010551291,0.0003205725,0.99874437,0.0000035548933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007090605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024416858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057125423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004504365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01128354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19110358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013151357","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1381","title":"Clinical Legal Education on the Ground: A Conversation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Communication","score_opus":0.13225084064314827,"score_gpt":0.4753807570936605,"score_spread":0.3431299164505123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013151357","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008008875,0.0032462603,0.00075103005,0.97039056,0.0075857854,0.000058501904,0.000019308152,0.00002528958,0.009914396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1634585,0.005911067,0.0015335212,0.8161367,0.0054864925,0.00031720163,0.00003359309,0.0001342293,0.006988673],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9146252,0.06495246,0.0016439834,0.0037490702,0.0052507874,0.009778439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8787629,0.071945205,0.0029931606,0.001365377,0.0065553756,0.038378056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06469168,0.0012346109,0.0018725351,0.003551149,0.072997674,0.03782193,0.00872439,0.054034684,0.011403165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07810017,0.0020789595,0.001874893,0.003979631,0.053054266,0.05461252,0.037428796,0.11744762,0.0014550762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092082555,0.00048645772,0.0016845785,0.0004473476,0.00002907887,0.005399573,0.62876,0.00017417216,0.00038127467,0.10264344,0.2365432,0.023358868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057328354,0.00009166813,0.00057979045,0.001272049,0.000009800787,0.0010807611,0.7206034,0.00031131398,0.00007225301,0.014417833,0.26140684,0.00009687275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03187033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05296016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072997674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038621128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048116803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34212637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013193154","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1375","title":"Just Clinics: A Humble Manifesto","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Legal service; Accountability; Legal profession; Manifesto; Inequality; Sociology; Intersection (aeronautics); Public relations; Construct (python library); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.15698979658348106,"score_gpt":0.4787690945841877,"score_spread":0.32177929800070665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013193154","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04089562,0.010637499,0.0083461655,0.5874222,0.0065252846,0.000084708496,0.00041903066,0.0004180324,0.34525144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6482635,0.0062901606,0.0027765983,0.16919568,0.004042561,0.00021940048,0.00024881138,0.0004557057,0.16850758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888271,0.0059719915,0.00031454116,0.0010710869,0.0024365168,0.0013787328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814543,0.012031722,0.0008171351,0.0010417965,0.0015901036,0.0030649127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010097634,0.0003197674,0.00030701834,0.000966182,0.009781963,0.014884653,0.001293594,0.009132085,0.015261536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019185157,0.00044436345,0.00029347886,0.0014542795,0.020668563,0.010325974,0.007939252,0.009673207,0.0018475315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001965402,0.000030916784,0.000690856,0.000085347216,0.0000037607067,0.00009914566,0.011364798,0.0000775644,0.00031279717,0.87716657,0.09363083,0.01651773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018295372,0.000053520504,0.0008808427,0.0002192964,0.0000056572844,0.00013516594,0.0061761728,0.00015241514,0.0002637823,0.039407946,0.9526507,0.000036160676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008876975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020991143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015261536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005953321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0144235855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053402066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013296520","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1378","title":"Confronting Accessibility in Clinical Legal Education: Human Rights Law and the Accommodation of Law Students with Disabilities in External Placements","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Reasonable accommodation; Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Duty; Human rights; Psychology","score_opus":0.09602452262224599,"score_gpt":0.49957155230346584,"score_spread":0.40354702968121986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013296520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3895827,0.0022571518,0.0053684376,0.33476007,0.0006626897,0.00022033147,0.00004988053,0.00004218274,0.26705655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885111,0.00049873086,0.00060584536,0.006709721,0.000097708384,0.00003722021,0.0000060773295,0.0000088050665,0.0035248105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96243674,0.012706828,0.0009505632,0.0012435657,0.006602185,0.016060174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95083576,0.01990694,0.0057339417,0.0010057561,0.0058962484,0.016621271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019829337,0.0003615144,0.0005485177,0.0023580515,0.034329195,0.019265983,0.004235668,0.009894222,0.00920709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07329964,0.00047650747,0.0005524597,0.0024335925,0.04477976,0.007893508,0.019401606,0.011970218,0.00036825385],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007394992,0.00056736264,0.03339929,0.00022961659,0.000023208033,0.0033587408,0.22985823,0.00079493574,0.00064600585,0.6482045,0.015417546,0.06742661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006136704,0.0001774502,0.05792413,0.0024120458,0.000042343927,0.0017236595,0.722707,0.0013335256,0.0006198969,0.13870879,0.074065074,0.00022468998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59916806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7840996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59916806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04306676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18294606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80638504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013577763","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1377","title":"Home, Precarious Home: A Year of Housing Law Advocacy at a Saskatoon Legal Clinic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Legal service; Representation (politics); Political science; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05871959572544358,"score_gpt":0.39984632916115737,"score_spread":0.34112673343571376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013577763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778888,0.00038540232,0.00034174725,0.012508138,0.0005622739,0.00019004889,0.00021204399,0.000044945973,0.007866666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665297,0.0008780404,0.00095307385,0.00889269,0.00022612265,0.00016387152,0.0003443841,0.000054710203,0.021957371],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966732,0.0007671736,0.000062492676,0.00019183948,0.00054228626,0.0017630248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913373,0.00040466478,0.00033683045,0.00015866922,0.00064041285,0.0071221273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029012233,0.00044623495,0.00083340623,0.0012255359,0.021847533,0.0056580114,0.0026028783,0.0023777424,0.0073291208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042868075,0.0008804728,0.0005156487,0.0011186332,0.00492213,0.0023337721,0.009277892,0.008263118,0.0011787658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024615848,0.007690259,0.21315978,0.00030175113,0.00008782497,0.024375087,0.55916125,0.0004005901,0.002696049,0.0044186045,0.080122806,0.107339814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029366367,0.0007982816,0.13144925,0.0002826925,0.00001851084,0.00213541,0.7925292,0.00025132226,0.00047158301,0.0009517516,0.07099036,0.00009226734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12499057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5891738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8750094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013957575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03480611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2485261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013616847","doi":"","title":"ACCLE and Bill C-75: Implications for Student Legal Clinics & Communities in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13615245027830042,"score_gpt":0.4707371071459603,"score_spread":0.33458465686765987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013616847","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04665198,0.0010811059,0.00041151795,0.9013364,0.0013408402,0.00018396588,0.00043666796,0.00007204049,0.04848556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43762147,0.0013884925,0.0016939911,0.48736522,0.0010134378,0.00027721006,0.00022654739,0.00010826422,0.07030548],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9596864,0.0047813123,0.0010273597,0.0021140801,0.007653877,0.024737025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82738286,0.03436761,0.0042547486,0.0015149312,0.02963719,0.10284265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017312454,0.00062830624,0.00125102,0.0027976632,0.05578108,0.021228585,0.00997331,0.044449188,0.03569999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07947904,0.0013538433,0.0021149898,0.0038570727,0.013996057,0.005700572,0.009527483,0.02761984,0.0016998928],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026144276,0.0008482083,0.06550943,0.0003415827,0.000109800174,0.0022102697,0.022133516,0.0023221623,0.0004270399,0.21978799,0.6412681,0.044780456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089482125,0.00055032835,0.2293022,0.0038671265,0.0004918816,0.0011095003,0.2439226,0.006796338,0.0007849084,0.068264045,0.44312903,0.00088712206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99136704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8152348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18476523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6141316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94555676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013925780","doi":"","title":"Duets, Not Solos: The McLachlin Court’s Co-Authorship Legacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0811891587362291,"score_gpt":0.4052365622287247,"score_spread":0.32404740349249556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013925780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050360378,0.004884228,0.010399112,0.4343901,0.003110438,0.000034092915,0.0001069524,0.00009768217,0.4966171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8821374,0.0012402833,0.0016389445,0.03749448,0.0031243716,0.000067392684,0.000031292784,0.00021071394,0.07405511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847017,0.00545084,0.0007204295,0.0035912674,0.0036618267,0.0018738908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8941039,0.08032401,0.0030538826,0.009415865,0.008126305,0.0049760193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02319938,0.0003535869,0.0009555129,0.00241827,0.024713282,0.019089233,0.002459923,0.016819576,0.016336296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.091291554,0.0006460161,0.00050120725,0.002622012,0.04088375,0.016807815,0.008256778,0.024399865,0.0014652475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108572685,0.0000075390653,0.00035584014,0.00000933915,0.0000061810715,0.00014033215,0.004219535,0.000047735637,0.000024607118,0.96236193,0.025534587,0.0072815027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003757166,0.000009175406,0.00054344273,0.00019091037,0.000013048009,0.0003002564,0.0037894733,0.00059007417,0.00027416972,0.8390415,0.15516901,0.000041346604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02182853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041506045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00802864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009659423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12269151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014905033","doi":"","title":"First nations and the NSW bar","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bar News: The Journal of the NSW Bar Association","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Geography; Population; State (computer science); Australian population; Socioeconomics; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.02265332885696516,"score_gpt":0.33168339292037174,"score_spread":0.3090300640634066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014905033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03741484,0.020505073,0.0005391278,0.44794387,0.025049975,0.000060525705,0.00045938487,0.00012648263,0.4679006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19491562,0.008298556,0.0009828692,0.11613673,0.0033578482,0.0001234603,0.00042584908,0.00018971524,0.67556936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926484,0.001401468,0.00021492608,0.0006052595,0.0024089008,0.002720982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856705,0.0013001019,0.0008371496,0.00045173327,0.0028601494,0.008880408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054084053,0.0003437544,0.0005048417,0.001509509,0.01177179,0.009281969,0.0016785989,0.004736958,0.043561604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017310426,0.0005858481,0.00046235957,0.00097014976,0.004304014,0.004928802,0.009338983,0.011816588,0.00683434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057251564,0.00013283666,0.007940266,0.00033568195,0.000019768844,0.0005472465,0.018753733,0.00006362447,0.00028903421,0.1257684,0.73068786,0.115404256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005789301,0.00004085512,0.009380566,0.00056056376,0.000006139842,0.00021627905,0.0049027577,0.0000463424,0.00006846997,0.0042377925,0.9805095,0.000024864772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19166285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40456593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19166285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012488612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026620353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38109452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014991094","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1118","title":"More lawyers, more litigation?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil litigation; Legal profession; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.03865006339226245,"score_gpt":0.35672241197888493,"score_spread":0.3180723485866225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014991094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68911093,0.010382158,0.0005596936,0.2490573,0.00049499306,0.000048210655,0.0008769387,0.00006796524,0.04940181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712332,0.0048219366,0.0004446881,0.011502735,0.00047330483,0.000014662139,0.0001813094,0.000015379659,0.011312737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980071,0.00024023233,0.000072030045,0.00033154176,0.00071198243,0.0006371645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878566,0.002812482,0.0050246567,0.0001824621,0.0010420757,0.0030816454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014410109,0.000092324946,0.00028258638,0.0016395468,0.0027388155,0.005036204,0.00076059916,0.0015980592,0.016340166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016104272,0.0002479375,0.0001788923,0.004092998,0.004277002,0.0049240403,0.0013009402,0.0017653509,0.0008826984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017768022,0.00034985895,0.643778,0.00049440184,0.00006617465,0.0010702856,0.03913102,0.00026148307,0.0015641118,0.032628976,0.058776002,0.221702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056126428,0.000087042055,0.7843718,0.00033766596,0.000038713402,0.001071954,0.085276455,0.00025571152,0.0002934343,0.00968119,0.11849853,0.00003134198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.485365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72376555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.485365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01611778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019103104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9650797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020830203","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2008.00144.x","title":"To Lawyer or Not to Lawyer: <i>Is</i> that the Question?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Legal service; Economic Justice; Legal profession; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.3002855949768109,"score_gpt":0.5415371594144396,"score_spread":0.24125156443762868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020830203","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23505872,0.013523298,0.0019567967,0.6927082,0.0012675249,0.000038517155,0.00026680043,0.0000132912455,0.05516685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94405985,0.0054305433,0.00054796116,0.045722593,0.0008215617,0.000028271596,0.00007347732,0.000014211554,0.0033014396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935288,0.003454129,0.00032547233,0.00057445007,0.0009665464,0.0011505624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97210646,0.016320031,0.006632544,0.00047066956,0.0025896481,0.0018806935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009569224,0.00012884177,0.00049495883,0.00083080435,0.003008688,0.0071569923,0.0011498536,0.004535714,0.0069415565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051309146,0.00019114131,0.00028099056,0.0014538171,0.01146817,0.010533608,0.002328139,0.00501984,0.0010544754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003059204,0.0005042322,0.28011048,0.00088133896,0.00019244339,0.0012290333,0.097231984,0.00032061068,0.0004727193,0.31522545,0.14034249,0.16318344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006613907,0.00020911156,0.14970379,0.0034735678,0.00015690578,0.001932538,0.5124322,0.0010005849,0.00078773097,0.14586207,0.18422602,0.00014928926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016531013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01918618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016531013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039875675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044496064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050607502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022039109","doi":"","title":"Court Fee-waiver Processes in Canada: How Wrong Assumptions, Change Resistance and Data Vacuums Hurt Vulnerable Parties","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Waiver; Tribunal; Business; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.10400577680557874,"score_gpt":0.3416109885132002,"score_spread":0.23760521170762147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022039109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71087337,0.0016646265,0.020150688,0.112469494,0.00034633814,0.0007900155,0.00046325522,0.0005783949,0.15266383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794041,0.00038850014,0.004049724,0.0029737821,0.000022048054,0.00008772725,0.00008437227,0.00007933429,0.012910322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96356744,0.010396389,0.00096521305,0.0032646602,0.012669114,0.0091371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9375252,0.030574009,0.003435673,0.0043674037,0.018012954,0.0060847355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03152974,0.0005495528,0.0006198428,0.002357891,0.04488546,0.018065728,0.005309983,0.005328792,0.0063355435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11443935,0.00087193627,0.0007332563,0.0037596405,0.022004772,0.0074583236,0.009933206,0.008599971,0.00055019534],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043800115,0.0004462302,0.054607064,0.00032610228,0.00013631249,0.0033251331,0.22710146,0.00755995,0.002265216,0.48912808,0.043618057,0.17104848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040497782,0.00051232387,0.09707292,0.0013985666,0.00042817896,0.0006658331,0.29277354,0.033624418,0.0054149637,0.16400066,0.40286833,0.0008353211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21076617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21076617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2925629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9153994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W302296022","doi":"10.14453/ltc.531","title":"Contents, acknowledgements and contributors","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law/text/culture","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"History; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03941823860959703,"score_gpt":0.3739004724613876,"score_spread":0.33448223385179054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W302296022","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031940793,0.013550681,0.009128458,0.0581471,0.6424343,0.0009396202,0.004812234,0.0015895122,0.266204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028470205,0.010005319,0.0061649648,0.018658867,0.20212282,0.0014137427,0.0041774116,0.0022897488,0.726697],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929196,0.0012231115,0.0004110708,0.0006409777,0.0044722175,0.0003330029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.942134,0.007532371,0.0020971908,0.004182993,0.03729848,0.0067548533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042286688,0.00096818485,0.0009081894,0.0040185545,0.0032477134,0.00975962,0.0012246083,0.0015554478,0.07569937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086130284,0.00033093928,0.00032014167,0.0018236161,0.0011839365,0.0034021584,0.0029520881,0.003317461,0.08442334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025540117,0.000016318869,0.00013456265,0.00012855789,0.0000024672818,0.00008224732,0.00056620204,0.000030853924,0.00039521203,0.0048369574,0.9686309,0.025150297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024505923,0.0000057826264,0.0001359056,0.00010890837,0.000002266395,0.00008462675,0.00026730192,0.000041963453,0.00011164853,0.0013813376,0.99785197,0.0000058917317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007314441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000923489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07569937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021161553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004338856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25323957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028311999","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3489","title":"Pillars of Justice: Lawyers and the Liberal Tradition, by Owen Fiss","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; HERO; Law; Sociology; Resilience (materials science); Criminology; Political science; Law and economics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.035978582492657674,"score_gpt":0.32261047470107124,"score_spread":0.28663189220841356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028311999","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004967098,0.12612858,0.001004411,0.7165465,0.006165592,0.000018300521,0.000035232548,0.000030975323,0.14510335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29913473,0.09404699,0.003107025,0.22786036,0.010677742,0.00014374091,0.00006958328,0.00012685079,0.36483297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983171,0.00083835854,0.000038349168,0.00014356362,0.0004338578,0.00022870452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977331,0.0014551469,0.00013020313,0.0000915751,0.00023155702,0.00035836626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027073002,0.00037812785,0.00029666958,0.0009880442,0.006773821,0.008440286,0.000684763,0.0044139735,0.0042342786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007542435,0.000327594,0.00018897593,0.0010831502,0.01421905,0.010536172,0.0034723764,0.010141003,0.0010010197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019798634,0.000031432028,0.00026387657,0.00006146649,0.0000033499782,0.000088791254,0.010432424,0.00008606698,0.000060765855,0.4910792,0.46875215,0.02912064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006274426,0.0000117616655,0.00048021082,0.00036427105,0.0000020537245,0.000060323855,0.005499164,0.00008756527,0.000040574287,0.14461732,0.8488179,0.000012589074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014081609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023278574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014081609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00535921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067607765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038884044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028386462","doi":"","title":"Archer Library: SOC215 - Canadian Justice System: Additional Resources","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.04284840177877106,"score_gpt":0.342657705623536,"score_spread":0.2998093038447649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028386462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042258392,0.00089865597,0.00032476286,0.0067621907,0.0023352986,0.0007479351,0.35249683,0.0028142857,0.6331975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043930584,0.001858823,0.0012928526,0.0022337988,0.0006778842,0.0005272892,0.08088857,0.0015488729,0.9065789],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964393,0.00018646405,0.00017184706,0.00016969698,0.0021588744,0.00087372825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732872,0.0025255163,0.000382133,0.0011152605,0.019065829,0.0036239594],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002325052,0.0017989906,0.002198422,0.013886065,0.009135352,0.010422144,0.004813059,0.0043407227,0.8874685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021685055,0.0010900929,0.0012386739,0.024612205,0.0015939455,0.0031017782,0.004440432,0.002278489,0.42784292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009559878,0.000009127983,0.000052260144,0.00010509175,0.0000012390748,0.000013764111,0.00002833798,0.000024714422,0.000009111319,0.0003053505,0.9944283,0.0050131334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003077226,0.0000035975986,0.0008750039,0.00019229673,0.0000073443375,0.000013542551,0.0002774415,0.00005945043,0.00005425059,0.00044723295,0.9980165,0.000022637303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9459159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9804601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8874685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040208343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15941076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29173326},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3032037380","doi":"","title":"Archer Library: SOC215 - Canadian Justice System: Doing a Search","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.07019292954047744,"score_gpt":0.39513591578247925,"score_spread":0.3249429862420018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032037380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043021217,0.014919365,0.0010630093,0.0619302,0.0026774814,0.0006244319,0.046940763,0.0015090731,0.86603355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06828443,0.027434774,0.0062155966,0.021497374,0.0012719972,0.00047627167,0.020647725,0.001301358,0.8528706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997282,0.00026967906,0.00014971117,0.00015735989,0.0014301835,0.0007110032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98999023,0.0018677594,0.00028439926,0.0004617801,0.004845607,0.0025501724],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028827295,0.0008406838,0.00090726605,0.01056806,0.015055261,0.013449256,0.0025095313,0.003937279,0.36105245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019718455,0.00051138096,0.00055877515,0.021982642,0.0027164759,0.004668452,0.0046998262,0.0021703886,0.04593103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029087492,0.000017702338,0.00056358194,0.00065584196,0.0000074997024,0.000112557405,0.00096463907,0.00006083952,0.00006239196,0.004915155,0.9508734,0.04173727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011570794,0.0000051434185,0.0013350503,0.00033492976,0.000015009993,0.000029684636,0.0021262383,0.000038777736,0.000060313716,0.00079187,0.9952383,0.000013059241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9655435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98976517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36105245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053028483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24826941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9113811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033184756","doi":"10.21991/cf29400","title":"Un-Chartered Waters: Ontario’s Campus Speech Directive and the Intersections of Academic Freedom, Expressive Freedom, and Institutional Autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; Academic freedom; Harassment; Government (linguistics); Free speech; Political science; Autonomy; Christian ministry; Sociology; Law; Higher education; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.026411209778183037,"score_gpt":0.2871335909468699,"score_spread":0.26072238116868685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033184756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05628483,0.009619451,0.0015099815,0.28834176,0.0015676726,0.00007269433,0.0012080094,0.000119865144,0.64127576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6635045,0.007166066,0.0009388415,0.042422846,0.00065917236,0.000081426544,0.0005840754,0.00016612138,0.28447703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418867,0.00073985575,0.00012574457,0.00038101143,0.002613732,0.0019509619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935342,0.0012305295,0.00044529187,0.00037990644,0.0020705347,0.0023395126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023309817,0.00031147464,0.00027892223,0.00087792566,0.02335426,0.011947576,0.0012727724,0.0039913096,0.013471888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060620513,0.00039404072,0.00028109827,0.0025867277,0.016908174,0.0045142435,0.0044714333,0.00544866,0.0015256577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008824082,0.000026174812,0.0050721923,0.00016932616,0.000008128028,0.00062475185,0.0626151,0.00019412841,0.0004379109,0.46534476,0.42884982,0.03656952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013961796,0.000007230261,0.006709944,0.00016708401,0.0000063294765,0.000052618205,0.02204566,0.00009980563,0.00019263815,0.009328713,0.9613276,0.00004850112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9815201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99431324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8991994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10080059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14765711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7313629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035188578","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3616319","title":"Billing without Bilking: Regulating Time-Based Legal Fees","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.0318688346320876,"score_gpt":0.33354540057550847,"score_spread":0.30167656594342085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035188578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1526316,0.0021865377,0.1375586,0.029872658,0.002500598,0.00085062254,0.00040588653,0.0018840947,0.6721094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9336399,0.00029705575,0.017993765,0.006475743,0.0007101324,0.00024093527,0.00008329931,0.00039266914,0.04016649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9632952,0.008328391,0.002071721,0.00487395,0.015731039,0.005699695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93405855,0.034332722,0.0058604092,0.0111202225,0.011696984,0.0029312037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019253697,0.0005775446,0.00088785274,0.0026140509,0.0035632302,0.017310629,0.0049281847,0.00982529,0.015310888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1045337,0.00086821057,0.0014638361,0.0016701539,0.0052520134,0.00914949,0.0048889862,0.009903251,0.004297129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024058257,0.00029233095,0.0037133822,0.00010971824,0.000052467163,0.00023716479,0.0014058708,0.0032351715,0.0029540744,0.91660625,0.01962412,0.051528964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036739497,0.0006679065,0.015318589,0.0009246356,0.00047970697,0.0010640572,0.0015267624,0.050231874,0.011726031,0.7032826,0.21395847,0.0004519251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009702766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0095771765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019253697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055913753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011791693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10182452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035453728","doi":"10.1111/1467-9752.12434","title":"Good Faith and Trustworthiness in University Governance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Philosophy of Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Corporate governance; Higher education; Political science; Obligation; Faith; Public relations; Trustworthiness; Relation (database); Business ethics; Sociology; Public administration; Moral obligation; Management; Law; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.037365583446204956,"score_gpt":0.3221833241163618,"score_spread":0.28481774067015686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035453728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20317714,0.018553091,0.032816272,0.27307615,0.0020043387,0.00010890771,0.00010599286,0.00016236969,0.46999574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926415,0.0014205817,0.0009935154,0.0011927411,0.00026146305,0.000011299227,0.000010606102,0.0000150576,0.003453199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984364,0.0105682835,0.0007081866,0.00081252743,0.002732149,0.0008148573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94781905,0.03215393,0.0056730597,0.004503503,0.0058885436,0.0039619487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0131015405,0.00017335924,0.0003819327,0.0015139731,0.003575597,0.01055867,0.0004969328,0.0023462477,0.004499345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055365924,0.0002290007,0.00019450206,0.0013731747,0.023897583,0.006610569,0.0043823696,0.002664414,0.00043508256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005145769,0.000042922893,0.0051982002,0.00016320829,0.000032078242,0.00019329722,0.0154794045,0.0008787813,0.00018918216,0.9316666,0.012031219,0.034073632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002049429,0.00004998081,0.006514417,0.00059078657,0.00001939278,0.00016045221,0.0087703755,0.0011510018,0.00021930171,0.92088497,0.061579637,0.000039241088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049209693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036497493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0131015405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004182939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054114666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06928837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037302220","doi":"","title":"Social Science Evidence in Poverty-Related Charter Claims:","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Poverty; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Scientific evidence; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.11936704409769806,"score_gpt":0.4390345066585063,"score_spread":0.31966746256080825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037302220","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011406844,0.17513649,0.013018219,0.63638145,0.0042766696,0.00020188198,0.0002433504,0.000056624143,0.15927848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5028614,0.23823044,0.026561739,0.21157888,0.007292211,0.00042551887,0.00035625164,0.00007699234,0.012616582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9521088,0.020370865,0.0032256434,0.003054348,0.019484274,0.0017560364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64235175,0.3233444,0.010061894,0.0053999536,0.01711788,0.0017241274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07034247,0.0005919303,0.001274773,0.0148524055,0.008190915,0.013781832,0.0033103814,0.017664254,0.0047436277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15433499,0.00080561487,0.0015606461,0.007482026,0.051826928,0.024805097,0.008525475,0.020671602,0.00052961346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014232689,0.000053266038,0.001749585,0.0019418554,0.00006219786,0.0006391586,0.0037198577,0.00025119557,0.00022419658,0.9262737,0.017414909,0.047655873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045906774,0.00006979902,0.004504527,0.019958954,0.00010965021,0.00044754075,0.005809902,0.0005376192,0.00077876355,0.5842627,0.383357,0.00011760902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029651934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05167438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07034247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012538614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030557038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.372011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039814737","doi":"10.1177/1037969x20938203","title":"Justice Carolyn Simpson and women’s changing place in the legal profession: ‘Yes, you can!’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternative Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Quarter (Canadian coin); Supreme court; Law; Legal profession; Project commissioning; Sociology; Political science; Publishing; History","score_opus":0.06636835495420072,"score_gpt":0.39202903495694175,"score_spread":0.325660680002741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039814737","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054349184,0.008407593,0.0003188876,0.87734014,0.0032742869,0.000021223306,0.000015221198,0.0000095849155,0.0562639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49534452,0.0072807097,0.00062700076,0.40503475,0.0014561142,0.0000552142,0.000012737484,0.00004591286,0.090143],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99506783,0.0020166838,0.000100843456,0.000465509,0.0011304265,0.0012186342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945748,0.0021245603,0.0003755,0.00010092488,0.00064568425,0.0021784927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004648859,0.0002630208,0.00039229693,0.0006430298,0.03569602,0.007837362,0.0010348808,0.00699608,0.004064675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011698896,0.0003229718,0.00028134708,0.0007006851,0.020419642,0.0049168984,0.0053115883,0.012548997,0.000522825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029702733,0.0000673616,0.005235929,0.00016999267,0.000012236356,0.0020675831,0.5152594,0.000069640955,0.0005679911,0.1324893,0.312731,0.031299915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059485565,0.000047111942,0.0049238293,0.0004344439,0.000007350476,0.00078098,0.33209664,0.00004916521,0.00020012028,0.012957725,0.6484513,0.00004537794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18295972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3796451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18295972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011152203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019733233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36378956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039919733","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0100","title":"Angela Fernandez, <i>Pierson v. Post, The Hunt for the Fox: Law and Professionalization in American Legal Culture</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Professionalization; Legal culture; Political science; Law; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.023642886250249066,"score_gpt":0.30790902438735934,"score_spread":0.28426613813711027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039919733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003440006,0.019066961,0.00027590146,0.9126396,0.0052123345,0.00002106824,0.00018113344,0.000039444865,0.05912353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16073261,0.043541078,0.0010946178,0.5836568,0.0066313683,0.00015495044,0.00021565006,0.00013912708,0.20383386],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980925,0.00044095388,0.000088331,0.0002460678,0.0007770664,0.0003551479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994709,0.0033174516,0.00030147724,0.00009270397,0.00093394227,0.00064549345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022213536,0.00046026925,0.000244278,0.0008690427,0.008819993,0.0068944586,0.0017720356,0.011063142,0.0069875014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012427109,0.00046325027,0.00035624937,0.00091648835,0.0049218214,0.005259535,0.002134246,0.009289536,0.0012288498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014815103,0.000011867873,0.00082366436,0.00005756158,0.000004270108,0.00011938213,0.0014845292,0.000026838203,0.000064681895,0.061676916,0.9299584,0.0057570566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038434275,0.000019990448,0.00792447,0.00051324005,0.000035420788,0.00022013446,0.010825286,0.00017737983,0.0006086274,0.018745955,0.9608411,0.000050080394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20022237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5062702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20022237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00729681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016856361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3981139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041149806","doi":"10.32920/29913059.v1","title":"Pragmatic Assorted Strategies: How Canadian Cause Lawyers Contribute to Social Change","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07732422968167321,"score_gpt":0.41340574872562524,"score_spread":0.336081519043952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041149806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5622775,0.003627275,0.009961563,0.08333069,0.00054088334,0.00080648623,0.00018166848,0.0002513049,0.33902267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98279405,0.00069814414,0.0021906856,0.0023546598,0.000019993286,0.000100463796,0.00004187167,0.00006707571,0.011733093],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9613275,0.02000295,0.00053899636,0.002300967,0.0074842763,0.008345389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811109,0.0075375317,0.0012262311,0.0008752145,0.004531121,0.00471902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020539263,0.00091928785,0.00077708974,0.0060235704,0.06674665,0.020348616,0.005182298,0.005351628,0.009659646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03214542,0.0007767136,0.00083070813,0.005401902,0.047168244,0.006723085,0.019146733,0.0059464676,0.00053429214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013845761,0.000037942144,0.004590422,0.0001103162,0.000014317814,0.0006807908,0.93932086,0.00012493586,0.0002596532,0.03310083,0.0048687444,0.016877383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012750134,0.000020832482,0.0047785337,0.000213143,0.000023754215,0.00011525572,0.859675,0.00026715518,0.00015044774,0.007776561,0.12691617,0.000050357357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.917815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9632719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15721247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15721247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19181314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9775141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042524624","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide (ARCHIVE): Provincial & Territory Legislation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Public administration; Library science; Law; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.11186610483615483,"score_gpt":0.4115374218235995,"score_spread":0.29967131698744465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042524624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014475262,0.0031498543,0.0018205339,0.009008722,0.0011604952,0.0012931371,0.09928902,0.002051775,0.880779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026173443,0.0023092828,0.0042917687,0.0015422911,0.00006498858,0.00059703476,0.020573268,0.0007078242,0.9672962],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857211,0.00084269326,0.0009913023,0.00063603884,0.009938903,0.0018700052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9510588,0.004925485,0.0006212958,0.0019161822,0.03977229,0.0017059293],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009324709,0.0014059083,0.0019497436,0.014979626,0.017309923,0.015215598,0.0050027473,0.00624496,0.29325673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03289723,0.0028645901,0.0013261688,0.027231054,0.003265681,0.007143526,0.0031722635,0.005114261,0.1224179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011377646,0.000023976014,0.000178856,0.00016575382,0.000002313375,0.000018905459,0.00040214232,0.000084129184,0.000040512477,0.009238004,0.9731935,0.016640496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008899373,0.000004406241,0.0022997009,0.0003576582,0.000008114572,0.000019070256,0.0006848368,0.00009610765,0.000122069934,0.0009813207,0.99538004,0.000037810092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9792837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99082315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08310145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3426053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9810415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042584627","doi":"","title":"Really Basic Rules for Writing Good Papers in Law School","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal writing; Law; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Legal research","score_opus":0.02612981119485827,"score_gpt":0.3398927623038475,"score_spread":0.3137629511089892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042584627","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022564805,0.013624738,0.5748865,0.13790919,0.048781358,0.00710897,0.0016753004,0.011412866,0.20234455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016703269,0.008542841,0.8344367,0.02203677,0.010032016,0.0072320323,0.0010322992,0.0040573715,0.09592665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8672869,0.062204555,0.025961967,0.0044323504,0.03734306,0.0027712064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69476587,0.14552327,0.018345445,0.036252875,0.09153536,0.013577124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08760054,0.0018940379,0.0016908658,0.0054768925,0.004945505,0.022772824,0.004470712,0.007960338,0.030515093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27187097,0.003486072,0.0016401222,0.005305578,0.009405896,0.017558333,0.0057193465,0.015078794,0.07891642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080347934,0.00013707315,0.00044186818,0.0012125798,0.000034347464,0.00024596567,0.0027436889,0.00028266595,0.0011814235,0.11673946,0.69764656,0.17925398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006932125,0.00009015873,0.00063885574,0.0017343136,0.000014883817,0.0004790571,0.0011802805,0.0003579762,0.00085379987,0.08905779,0.9054261,0.000097471995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010735549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025327432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08760054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030546116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46328145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043496556","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Law Course Reserves: Aboriginal Law & Policy in Canada (LAW 453)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14921313142067064,"score_gpt":0.5221195074610093,"score_spread":0.3729063760403387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043496556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019755136,0.013308578,0.0017721135,0.07382098,0.003956036,0.0018040563,0.097713076,0.0015291639,0.7863408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027051084,0.004044586,0.0016480604,0.00497157,0.0002545805,0.0004124122,0.006181088,0.00021303276,0.95522356],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895537,0.000117671,0.000058629965,0.0000938011,0.0004931005,0.0002813621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927207,0.0014022994,0.00017974885,0.00017278087,0.004119577,0.0014048875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024269624,0.0004704958,0.00042692028,0.0032266206,0.013059914,0.0065154955,0.0016165775,0.003570256,0.13873689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074149864,0.0005984249,0.00028587066,0.007908754,0.0016439635,0.002022569,0.0014529978,0.002525219,0.015758913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009778176,0.00002772345,0.0009629808,0.000100650956,0.0000011941283,0.000039726932,0.0019538149,0.00006770267,0.000050688686,0.0043058377,0.9745915,0.01788836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012673911,0.000012129962,0.01251345,0.00030893652,0.000006503477,0.0000223741,0.008811536,0.00011995922,0.00014527656,0.0009779999,0.97704643,0.000022757542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98825246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99647444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13873689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039340194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19122715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4641211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043982908","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0003","title":"Catalytic agents? Lon Fuller, James Milner, and the lawyer as social architect, 1950–69","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Scholarship; Law; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Variety (cybernetics); Legal education; Political science","score_opus":0.029968031947274987,"score_gpt":0.2937238616934155,"score_spread":0.26375582974614054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043982908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040803093,0.12062737,0.0024433304,0.4512909,0.0022037297,0.00003880839,0.000059761347,0.000047176352,0.38248584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77850133,0.04067126,0.0017679807,0.042704638,0.001456568,0.00009000223,0.000038691873,0.000069169124,0.13470042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830735,0.0008437942,0.000039378425,0.00020112561,0.00029464363,0.00031361182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874806,0.00056206336,0.00010757194,0.000056731264,0.00013853525,0.00038691954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033819266,0.00048038215,0.00027057354,0.0012621852,0.015442189,0.008755327,0.0008747919,0.0051472774,0.0041533257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003575366,0.00041975334,0.00014739901,0.0012508675,0.04943266,0.008967117,0.0026824472,0.004450574,0.00054363336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007897405,0.000015271664,0.000357165,0.000021719512,0.0000015996669,0.000085963475,0.033642936,0.00006586618,0.000035818335,0.9039086,0.054878756,0.006978398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012146272,0.000011754452,0.0011208345,0.00022624967,0.0000034418338,0.00010862857,0.022644222,0.00011799079,0.00012104926,0.14990066,0.8257135,0.000019430023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23324034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36588234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23324034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03441473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017878404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46376544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044309107","doi":"10.17323/2072-8166.2020.2.254.260","title":"Искусство судить","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Art; Psychology","score_opus":0.06947252083414208,"score_gpt":0.31854749482865996,"score_spread":0.2490749739945179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044309107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022714473,0.029637815,0.040864464,0.016030898,0.0021268865,0.0000813202,0.0006744843,0.0002508788,0.8876188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79000133,0.022486648,0.053041436,0.0021000472,0.0012920273,0.00053994457,0.00043625617,0.00039358335,0.12970877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746466,0.0006377806,0.00013312526,0.0003851205,0.001040438,0.00033886195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850935,0.0005091651,0.00011705415,0.00028135857,0.00048675237,0.00009635409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021595715,0.0006216007,0.00037291113,0.002032505,0.003562431,0.0070391023,0.0006540468,0.0015076387,0.016729644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036733116,0.0006587041,0.00047026033,0.002260175,0.013376824,0.0030116,0.001764469,0.0032373017,0.0039989655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014033389,0.000005897241,0.0001602606,0.000046471778,0.0000036477873,0.0001094687,0.0015972392,0.00010867255,0.000225584,0.9760242,0.0058466103,0.015857777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020051675,0.000012667812,0.001271424,0.00016878823,0.000011399623,0.0005953341,0.0019367525,0.00031276848,0.0005835366,0.41373518,0.5813207,0.000031416886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026878642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037770364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026878642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006024621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005820349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055966258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046756140","doi":"","title":"Differential treatment: how testimony is discussed in assault and sexual assault cases at the Court of Appeal of Québec.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DH","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Sexual assault; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Law; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.08205392744769886,"score_gpt":0.3564691125873369,"score_spread":0.27441518513963803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046756140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44700813,0.009891666,0.00624532,0.14849125,0.001376881,0.00030418293,0.0003998331,0.00010995457,0.3861727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96531206,0.0018032895,0.0024002658,0.008466721,0.0000860307,0.0000607341,0.00008921955,0.000025160782,0.021756534],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929368,0.0036741009,0.00017736816,0.00033527162,0.001428668,0.001447846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99003893,0.005925965,0.0005986811,0.00021589547,0.0019778032,0.0012425988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049127596,0.00023735811,0.0002633111,0.0020687091,0.015784465,0.0041826707,0.0018736807,0.00529687,0.013310155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036374684,0.00028753013,0.00027210245,0.0016777881,0.0053371037,0.0024805064,0.0037895653,0.0040134257,0.0008110382],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004017876,0.00044285748,0.06127487,0.00077914493,0.000066127526,0.022823676,0.273966,0.0013353346,0.0027947337,0.11691715,0.1544201,0.36477816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116314724,0.00018790254,0.15576844,0.003277555,0.00018385549,0.0094961785,0.4549151,0.0036079253,0.0021684791,0.037275344,0.33277214,0.00023075119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6920725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89817154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3079275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026926905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039148353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61948186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049269530","doi":"","title":"The Origins of Hostility to the Rule of Law in Canadian Academia: A History of Administrativism and Anti-Historicity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Rule of law; Law; Legal history; Historicity (philosophy); Hegemony; Chivalry; Political science; Ideology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Politics","score_opus":0.021417769214879763,"score_gpt":0.32804320551084143,"score_spread":0.3066254362959617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049269530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17915846,0.017293427,0.0033959472,0.21116515,0.00089129235,0.00007677538,0.00017575687,0.00016737697,0.5876758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97039425,0.0040630517,0.0006582956,0.0035934248,0.00014214643,0.00001708744,0.000021396974,0.000056450343,0.02105385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931324,0.0013400855,0.00012463074,0.00070536375,0.002156298,0.002541297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910609,0.0037252496,0.0006593585,0.00047187597,0.0023591244,0.001723528],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007791555,0.00040744725,0.00053412135,0.004871269,0.045151602,0.016816406,0.0022888798,0.004409858,0.0068201493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012050145,0.00045825852,0.00034375637,0.005905997,0.0892356,0.0045692488,0.0051623406,0.0080454135,0.00029558715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014015218,0.00002060986,0.0011759731,0.000051688712,0.000004703513,0.00017050956,0.07472328,0.00018604698,0.00011016277,0.9015748,0.006294774,0.01567349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002707048,0.0000406571,0.014486932,0.00053187885,0.000028231594,0.00019541687,0.086976156,0.0007905067,0.00056521327,0.13863865,0.7575601,0.00015919053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9881429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9548484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25966114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25891992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8586881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082001594","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198834328.003.0010","title":"10. Persuasive oral communication and presentations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Class (philosophy); Communication skills; Eye contact; Psychology; Body language; Persuasive communication; Medical education; Computer science; Social psychology; Medicine; Persuasion; Communication; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07895783769981153,"score_gpt":0.31464223690763304,"score_spread":0.23568439920782153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082001594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013029341,0.004454794,0.0027890073,0.00149052,0.0009990971,0.00008013839,0.00007886631,0.00026779957,0.98853683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015587877,0.006651046,0.0036987488,0.0011158283,0.0006005806,0.00009442203,0.00019092082,0.00022515804,0.9718354],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991345,0.00017542596,0.00003287551,0.00006798452,0.00050250196,0.00008676871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994529,0.000260348,0.00003448648,0.000049755097,0.0001432005,0.00005941892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045369723,0.0005729426,0.0002148949,0.0010787417,0.0010806802,0.0042649647,0.0008924484,0.0017477035,0.12754272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021892772,0.0003058337,0.00044250058,0.00075414655,0.000835251,0.0030077328,0.0022007402,0.0021542134,0.04910009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003602365,0.00014440579,0.00013166905,0.0008228195,0.000005715539,0.00031432963,0.003303961,0.0004815223,0.0024137003,0.16565631,0.32921296,0.49747652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047227727,0.00001887303,0.0001500819,0.00030678202,0.0000010748989,0.00026396898,0.00039166684,0.00012383393,0.0004231785,0.0072003943,0.9911082,0.0000072773255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012052733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018150383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12754272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009879542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010313699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42667288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084167299","doi":"10.3138/9781487532994-006","title":"5. The Failure to Operationalize: Realism and Formalism in Canadian Common Law Contracts Teaching","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Formalism (music); Realism; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.02802687562479353,"score_gpt":0.28417425129987156,"score_spread":0.25614737567507806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084167299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007244787,0.0040391935,0.003945071,0.045620874,0.00055733696,0.00003644817,0.00016428079,0.000059991635,0.93833196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3891178,0.0032033606,0.004712074,0.008615268,0.00022034072,0.00008702556,0.000096374366,0.00014740604,0.5938003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977871,0.00046197124,0.000046799683,0.0001780139,0.0008071079,0.0007189953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748456,0.0011423052,0.000070136026,0.00013129028,0.00087593397,0.00029578197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022397744,0.00049399544,0.00025731465,0.0016668203,0.01643207,0.009390851,0.0014213651,0.005112228,0.02881248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005981971,0.00041522295,0.00037274588,0.002393444,0.015078172,0.004318373,0.0025090063,0.0056457194,0.0016728871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001475656,0.0000026569207,0.000068926944,0.000012141837,4.3638488e-7,0.000018489722,0.003967162,0.000060179038,0.00001883616,0.96798617,0.023131695,0.0047318754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064735586,0.000007122966,0.0015546333,0.00021461355,0.000007247339,0.000063681015,0.0075133108,0.0005116599,0.0002102501,0.1948859,0.794994,0.000031182088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95068425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.932246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06775399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0826362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49159193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086352963","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Subsequent consideration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08275445765846003,"score_gpt":0.358693110587028,"score_spread":0.275938652928568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086352963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017621907,0.0037282775,0.00066218385,0.115331285,0.0050928905,0.000507553,0.003935175,0.00061066885,0.8683698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060110446,0.001917876,0.0010635746,0.028404674,0.00054406706,0.00015974308,0.0007260557,0.00017671358,0.9609962],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986888,0.000753153,0.00053518097,0.00060364505,0.008346381,0.0028736473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95945007,0.005021207,0.00045924104,0.00095853856,0.030115018,0.003996006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008207411,0.0011480264,0.0010062956,0.0076941256,0.021763414,0.019436711,0.0052384636,0.029522834,0.1780011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035231773,0.0013443494,0.0012896728,0.009216617,0.0053042187,0.0059098587,0.0045115594,0.009283271,0.035598084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009563534,0.000022534108,0.00017860498,0.00008447024,0.000002074193,0.000060478444,0.00026502073,0.000062815765,0.000045326084,0.032129776,0.9559072,0.011232038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070820147,0.0000045502074,0.0008379946,0.00017611474,0.000007895633,0.000020250405,0.00064527296,0.000103151215,0.00007430979,0.001745833,0.99635136,0.000026191827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97405577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97405577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.093357444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35402086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67735887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087291905","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6418","title":"Legal Technology and the Future of Women in Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Diversity (politics); Promotion (chess); Practice of law; Legal process; Productivity; Public relations; Equal employment opportunity; Work (physics); Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Economic growth; Politics","score_opus":0.029694280019558206,"score_gpt":0.3563620919052209,"score_spread":0.3266678118856627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087291905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17627065,0.031572178,0.0022900521,0.47918612,0.0017579339,0.000040655505,0.00012382797,0.000050239007,0.3087084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88032913,0.012722973,0.0008097037,0.028783951,0.0012508687,0.000044747376,0.000044671993,0.000042851832,0.075971134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601847,0.0016294463,0.000077743134,0.0003295921,0.00057267555,0.0013721111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99469155,0.0020392356,0.0006756519,0.00017888281,0.0005037866,0.0019108914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058351513,0.00020018937,0.00032419284,0.0015612384,0.010758924,0.012521078,0.00084054127,0.0038497145,0.019296095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065561384,0.00024516205,0.00029537978,0.0014001102,0.017428147,0.010548021,0.0065640723,0.0038615507,0.002278009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007204738,0.00016261495,0.015838085,0.00012713681,0.0000077467175,0.0007392745,0.15974583,0.00010883447,0.0005712828,0.67127,0.031747397,0.11960984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014593793,0.00011655304,0.0084372675,0.0005997632,0.0000065416907,0.000520736,0.10186167,0.0001873713,0.00027744606,0.100744076,0.78718954,0.000044380315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008967303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013666132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019296095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048044897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005324952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06455183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087445873","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6431","title":"Caught By Private Law: A Review Of Visitors’ Jurisdiction In Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Appeal; Visitor pattern; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Position (finance); Private law; Sociology; Comparative law; Business","score_opus":0.0639248299723872,"score_gpt":0.41718536120011396,"score_spread":0.35326053122772677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087445873","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022771294,0.9968843,0.000019976183,0.0007700499,0.00008460397,0.000006731949,0.000029894518,0.0000016518399,0.0019750244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040378454,0.9951068,0.000045296372,0.00051863503,0.00005241663,0.000005462027,0.000026199708,0.0000019299034,0.00020548185],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967507,0.0005678179,0.00024931564,0.00024828964,0.0018291136,0.00035481463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99088883,0.0045034057,0.00068844896,0.0001398597,0.0031955924,0.0005838721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00464953,0.0005847597,0.0016299876,0.007691617,0.002243993,0.0042310106,0.0016758213,0.0017228264,0.0034666457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011115255,0.0005135493,0.00080861663,0.018896,0.0045530675,0.001991443,0.0014779437,0.0023231802,0.00030749437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011589549,0.000059992788,0.001540231,0.060841147,0.00029589757,0.000250308,0.0019733438,0.00046871963,0.00018239615,0.03488785,0.085978314,0.8134058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026336795,0.00005787073,0.009091286,0.062917046,0.0004325219,0.00031046534,0.0013488728,0.00009751833,0.00011110688,0.0019534838,0.9235979,0.000055641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83335626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92148906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16664374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04089977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.116072476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33525026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090394908","doi":"10.1177/2322005820946698","title":"Comparing Experiential Legal Education in Canada and India","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Experiential learning; Context (archaeology); Experiential education; Globe; Political science; Law; Public relations; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.02319583790961076,"score_gpt":0.3372449155097941,"score_spread":0.3140490776001833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090394908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8258821,0.0032289117,0.0005454117,0.009809564,0.00018790201,0.0002215404,0.0011093655,0.000072714414,0.15894246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877301,0.0023268615,0.0003709491,0.00083630835,0.000020980302,0.00005187527,0.0005828546,0.000024531524,0.00805558],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446833,0.0006026243,0.00022978947,0.00025970832,0.0025592425,0.0018802751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853827,0.0028003862,0.0015314325,0.0004998316,0.005841657,0.0039440417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016440534,0.0002513346,0.00035315566,0.0046107057,0.006970701,0.005508151,0.0015079187,0.0005686632,0.0051762075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011412361,0.00021338322,0.0005002922,0.00944851,0.0036548283,0.0013332772,0.0042513334,0.0020908397,0.00028790647],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012062332,0.0014354534,0.32687327,0.0019161552,0.0002177019,0.0033225412,0.12973365,0.0016014151,0.001441262,0.15139088,0.035357982,0.3455035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008350398,0.00026995834,0.67547613,0.0011164371,0.00013266536,0.000884367,0.1830799,0.00082803407,0.0010910846,0.0017646085,0.13513397,0.00013925902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91517127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94973946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94733864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052661378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09230536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3820868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092132422","doi":"10.53300/001c.17542","title":"The Importance of Inculcating the ‘Pro Bono Ethos’ in Law Students, and the Opportunities to Do It Better","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Legal education; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Law; Political science; Project commissioning; Public relations; Sociology; Publishing; Medicine","score_opus":0.14085309456681291,"score_gpt":0.46547350446779073,"score_spread":0.32462040990097785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092132422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05980185,0.08383398,0.0044324882,0.722304,0.00437185,0.0001332217,0.000027411379,0.000031027674,0.12506428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6925982,0.066327095,0.0043247957,0.20524526,0.0027842703,0.00023377394,0.00004435761,0.000057171477,0.028384954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95894814,0.025052922,0.0015803966,0.0019256852,0.009534865,0.00295803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303124,0.045628082,0.006277722,0.0019525768,0.010978716,0.0048505105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030696338,0.00016860291,0.0005862687,0.0012752503,0.0055739465,0.011495999,0.0013100423,0.0074131503,0.0036771477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057549078,0.00032174194,0.0004544088,0.0010212302,0.022036811,0.009141224,0.0072197607,0.011379236,0.00064588187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056815323,0.00027062482,0.0076076076,0.004169812,0.0000529872,0.0006868137,0.05863656,0.00036354075,0.0014166358,0.5225894,0.05437791,0.3497713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003083296,0.0004148795,0.02040689,0.00768483,0.000044847537,0.0007948783,0.038208004,0.00018526189,0.0008543939,0.07390903,0.85736376,0.00010240124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013041814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028271267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030696338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050831637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02785477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16233969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092216237","doi":"10.1177/1715163520963840","title":"Looking back, looking forward: Reflections on an evolving profession","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.10239889024991794,"score_gpt":0.40373497749701337,"score_spread":0.30133608724709543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092216237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003960687,0.0026657318,0.00035772903,0.98071724,0.0036664095,0.000016031843,0.00002444021,0.000016913391,0.008574712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20320676,0.0085762,0.0025282076,0.75370663,0.0039315717,0.00010523062,0.00005042712,0.00022177437,0.027673185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9524658,0.01814282,0.0013692522,0.0026554635,0.011349171,0.014017559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8679559,0.047511388,0.0038544184,0.0019648452,0.025738113,0.052975368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046164755,0.0007356801,0.00134569,0.002535912,0.062051676,0.039094947,0.007003647,0.042988848,0.018559562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0680209,0.0010438,0.001657302,0.004002291,0.07527917,0.03046371,0.022815447,0.07495244,0.0028268157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009398044,0.00020224297,0.0025298789,0.00048154543,0.000029634057,0.0017965037,0.34502274,0.00013649045,0.0004548298,0.13171685,0.47288126,0.0446541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033291868,0.00003150601,0.0014413695,0.0008938629,0.0000142772815,0.0003631516,0.44388527,0.00006181491,0.00010997349,0.021105226,0.5319544,0.00010582172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46542984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6910819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46542984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078061536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2300972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9254415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093681448","doi":"10.29173/assert4","title":"Practice requires rationale: Lessons from global contexts to ensure controversial issue education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Social Studies Education Research for Teachers","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.4682229320607978,"score_gpt":0.6435337247440555,"score_spread":0.17531079268325767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093681448","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013676046,0.002711086,0.039773226,0.85363996,0.002635246,0.00037725377,0.000038187874,0.0004305426,0.0867184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62616307,0.004181803,0.15331052,0.17334314,0.0010203363,0.0015294161,0.0001357408,0.0012439508,0.03907208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9318784,0.048931558,0.002432371,0.003181369,0.0094531365,0.0041231546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7522187,0.16247556,0.006173056,0.023499655,0.030824332,0.024808671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11237679,0.0011163002,0.00097591797,0.0018263395,0.025793077,0.020151302,0.0068722116,0.020683633,0.018583199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18588957,0.0016361729,0.0012815777,0.0013304701,0.04014279,0.03593066,0.025657484,0.03287261,0.004904328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068891764,0.0005045503,0.0056073656,0.0009181445,0.000038996415,0.0017001516,0.22993027,0.00048787374,0.00078950875,0.3709988,0.20094237,0.18801308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009218884,0.00008415362,0.0031991706,0.0038708597,0.000041758067,0.00090665685,0.19298965,0.00070793024,0.0008941135,0.4007575,0.3963239,0.00013207733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015469107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06253352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11237679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010942812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078295365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59431237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093866784","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2020.1830098","title":"From partners to team leaders: tracking changes in the Canadian legal profession","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Legal profession; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Perception; Public relations; Tracking (education); Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.13424230186723862,"score_gpt":0.46413658331281477,"score_spread":0.32989428144557614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093866784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634655,0.0016246063,0.0011024772,0.0038600944,0.00011566988,0.00025931973,0.0018957624,0.0000882476,0.02758829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986358,0.0011255501,0.0015742964,0.00044048813,0.000027332135,0.00011475531,0.00090649776,0.000034424887,0.009418811],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99007726,0.0010772628,0.00026770832,0.0011585699,0.0057665077,0.0016527098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96222043,0.0045189224,0.0061030006,0.00079756865,0.020728167,0.005631787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070845746,0.00041233856,0.00039029343,0.013914092,0.01122783,0.0066673905,0.0030242025,0.0013744824,0.0045740986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03209441,0.00045809997,0.00029038556,0.012314146,0.0032028637,0.0029665444,0.005974343,0.00190151,0.0006507889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001847248,0.00010327282,0.4085214,0.00039576928,0.000039444723,0.00053536985,0.43640026,0.00022273447,0.0012378057,0.004854573,0.016394677,0.13111003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010354238,0.00006330533,0.5219432,0.00025110916,0.000023213846,0.0001615843,0.40881303,0.00080619205,0.00059613376,0.0005308422,0.06671473,0.00008630832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9731626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98738664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9374652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062534794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09401282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4537238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094345466","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3606","title":"Ontario Civil Justice Reform in the Wake of COVID-19: Inspired or Institutionalized?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Democracy; Law; Political science; Civil procedure; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.12157321891848417,"score_gpt":0.40948346848745354,"score_spread":0.2879102495689694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094345466","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08091189,0.007468101,0.0005500895,0.76613003,0.0014128215,0.00016363146,0.00029516255,0.00007633381,0.14299196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8482324,0.005787515,0.00096663384,0.089921035,0.0006528594,0.00012816477,0.00018031742,0.00006054653,0.0540705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836817,0.002414651,0.00024487203,0.00077767274,0.0039376374,0.008943532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870929,0.0010453948,0.00089847326,0.0004881682,0.0028375858,0.007637423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064270888,0.0002877613,0.0005027767,0.0010993655,0.028993137,0.01699062,0.0028958418,0.007906637,0.008326887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017270224,0.00047890312,0.0005415615,0.0021031327,0.026124211,0.0048781135,0.0072985482,0.008277213,0.0006430773],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016737658,0.00019638112,0.016528064,0.00064643275,0.00008330874,0.0019092797,0.08211984,0.0010976736,0.001194124,0.5292882,0.3058811,0.06088824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010005676,0.000075804914,0.049340535,0.0005216543,0.000053281066,0.00014350563,0.065421686,0.00050665956,0.00041870654,0.021318587,0.8619661,0.00013355381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97814494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31229854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31229854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47777864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7976362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310079937","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v33i3.52598","title":"The Last Word on Bekkerman and Lucy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); State (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Psychology; Media studies; Law; Pedagogy; Visual arts; Art; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04104367786079907,"score_gpt":0.4214018302640289,"score_spread":0.3803581524032298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W310079937","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005896319,0.0403533,0.0009014651,0.6974738,0.072371766,0.000018996194,0.00015553342,0.000121538025,0.18801394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028939078,0.021909144,0.0012940939,0.40172637,0.046947777,0.00008138287,0.00014689472,0.00044480833,0.4985104],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754024,0.00088788604,0.00012269027,0.00036851357,0.00087233604,0.00020824828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954123,0.0023842778,0.00022917186,0.00029547478,0.0011974549,0.00048141848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018020818,0.00081769394,0.00079432304,0.0012506131,0.004479175,0.0066737155,0.001175139,0.0053878557,0.042397767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015570727,0.0003590793,0.00048119147,0.00092388195,0.0071298997,0.008958083,0.0020141113,0.012842603,0.020598162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010955039,0.000008743844,0.000055187378,0.000030265144,0.0000026052703,0.000037263064,0.00039886113,0.000009872665,0.00002794851,0.046060193,0.9470365,0.0063215704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003623603,0.0000063747048,0.00013788253,0.000191835,0.0000020107777,0.00007159236,0.00062449777,0.000025514802,0.000036125944,0.008912253,0.98998,0.000008306582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010202899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017554395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042397767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034263555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002838682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14183468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107126863","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6265-403-7_8","title":"The Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international: Founding, Function, Future","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Netherlands yearbook of international law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Yearbook; Audience measurement; Political science; Scholarship; International law; Globe; Law; Library science; Medicine","score_opus":0.018024414603902007,"score_gpt":0.2936836945523216,"score_spread":0.27565927994841954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107126863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020806582,0.09419813,0.0029942954,0.030142033,0.014795179,0.0002997498,0.019518053,0.00063762284,0.83533436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020268701,0.08408387,0.005260375,0.0030593895,0.0014316203,0.00018928484,0.011568285,0.0005515024,0.873587],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496377,0.00019246418,0.00015385862,0.00026725823,0.003858062,0.0005646435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98988813,0.00077446294,0.00037987198,0.000432167,0.0066581224,0.0018672026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027996926,0.0008752942,0.0005369963,0.010529648,0.005942204,0.011249779,0.0017117244,0.0016928118,0.0501272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011142348,0.0004948041,0.00028707954,0.020431856,0.003318538,0.004165445,0.0021501184,0.0031036558,0.012920297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049362416,0.0000055018254,0.00025894007,0.00012511844,0.0000015139158,0.000016745482,0.0003383116,0.00011748085,0.000036244757,0.046042576,0.90076226,0.052290283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.5797655e-7,5.5456337e-7,0.00030164738,0.00007903282,5.2188904e-7,0.000006500991,0.0000956319,0.000013951212,0.000011073438,0.0006265656,0.99886,0.0000042661018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89987385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9292025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95605516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043944847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15323135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31884372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110684112","doi":"","title":"Law Schools, Clinical Legal Education, and the Pandemic Portal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Pandemic; Legal education; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.0472514389283841,"score_gpt":0.4171659212731266,"score_spread":0.36991448234474256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110684112","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01091126,0.0042393557,0.0015207401,0.5308973,0.002433214,0.000050193685,0.00028535898,0.0004426697,0.44921988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4195778,0.010319752,0.0051716897,0.21025297,0.0062304297,0.00024765113,0.00066966336,0.00040458463,0.34712544],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592566,0.002308486,0.0001580419,0.00018489028,0.00079999643,0.0006230075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96784,0.017757762,0.0012407207,0.0012313167,0.0014001832,0.010530036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071605197,0.0002411208,0.00032065238,0.0019970872,0.004745632,0.014731499,0.0012193774,0.009328208,0.16240303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020069692,0.00037022383,0.00029204003,0.0019946413,0.0071705207,0.014384735,0.011030038,0.006907252,0.01059169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042982865,0.00039936052,0.0033192437,0.00015838494,0.000005778819,0.00023073264,0.0017187516,0.00009305671,0.00013258684,0.33642685,0.488822,0.16865021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074005125,0.00009530461,0.00469371,0.00076974253,0.0000065320155,0.00033960285,0.009547537,0.00026498488,0.00022998342,0.17971335,0.8042365,0.000028731061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028946372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008336961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16240303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003980347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014676634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5432923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110971923","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5301137","title":"Law School Assessment Revisited","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.016047237957281933,"score_gpt":0.40229726757775885,"score_spread":0.38625002962047694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110971923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021102361,0.0042534512,0.0067918315,0.72687215,0.004252376,0.00013567641,0.00030157744,0.00025034358,0.23604023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5928236,0.0022312582,0.0065923575,0.24060328,0.0034172647,0.00031216448,0.00019099565,0.00027572023,0.15355337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786235,0.006385288,0.0010965117,0.0038553376,0.006552865,0.0034865816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94009715,0.03075829,0.0016482341,0.0028942903,0.017013349,0.007588774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024096517,0.0005057154,0.0012156253,0.0071907067,0.01349848,0.013469701,0.0048213066,0.019006688,0.031884413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0927672,0.000792054,0.0013995044,0.0037294005,0.020967344,0.014095837,0.011780979,0.027084332,0.0033203647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003785846,0.00021718722,0.0072659375,0.00010906391,0.000029696828,0.0003896315,0.0067252754,0.00027570405,0.00010721873,0.70129734,0.18832842,0.09521667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008976372,0.00007502722,0.024118004,0.001153246,0.00007845468,0.000625393,0.017626658,0.0018979635,0.0006658347,0.41159573,0.5419601,0.00011381381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1197359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21509463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1197359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0152270775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033826225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23807794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111052694","doi":"","title":"Making Something New: Legal Education in a Pandemic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Political science; Public relations; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.10403050436640075,"score_gpt":0.4518463399978851,"score_spread":0.3478158356314843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111052694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006252753,0.007516511,0.0009941348,0.88396883,0.0038740642,0.00001591522,0.000037857364,0.00006177325,0.09727813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43218815,0.021949818,0.0049725478,0.421867,0.010795185,0.00013241486,0.00011876012,0.00016812481,0.10780793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968581,0.001791781,0.00009485543,0.00017144938,0.00054064905,0.0005431162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98701084,0.008542139,0.0004690013,0.000511427,0.0009325879,0.002534064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006200675,0.00031917501,0.00039807436,0.001137286,0.006782289,0.011510411,0.00091517414,0.014166332,0.042693466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01824553,0.00017581665,0.00038336395,0.0008253279,0.014230704,0.018850397,0.00618637,0.013701329,0.003547695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043404652,0.0002837122,0.0017198984,0.00024094744,0.000011631533,0.0007034089,0.0080207465,0.0003124658,0.0005783722,0.57635576,0.26220298,0.14952663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003223704,0.000071140596,0.002351662,0.0013914984,0.000007379114,0.0003217572,0.019848865,0.0003319126,0.00033504024,0.35202023,0.6232441,0.00004409955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033591893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007039329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042693466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00492323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0124288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14282387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111650507","doi":"10.1186/s12875-020-01339-y","title":"Legal needs of patients attending an urban family practice in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: an observational study of a legal health clinic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Family Practice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University; Impact","funders":"Ontario Trillium Foundation","keywords":"Medicine; Observational study; Family medicine; Poverty; Health care; Logistic regression; Intervention (counseling); Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.2564503065783359,"score_gpt":0.4328576868650489,"score_spread":0.176407380286713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111650507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978393,0.00020778315,0.000038404836,0.0002935395,0.00000598196,0.00009256179,0.0006427492,0.0000032308255,0.00087661284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860686,0.00023830596,0.000100416466,0.00023576806,0.0000065589193,0.000037226382,0.00035930562,0.0000026187072,0.00041298714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983209,0.0002319063,0.00014144763,0.00022998445,0.00056194246,0.0005137295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99531627,0.00038669317,0.001542906,0.00012965877,0.0010490326,0.0015755023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006708858,0.00030075855,0.00044628582,0.0009684846,0.004158196,0.00135818,0.0014258784,0.0007085226,0.0017285906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034001637,0.00060243707,0.0004286808,0.0031436936,0.001391847,0.0007339515,0.0015929866,0.0012943348,0.00023003644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048687754,0.00013685245,0.9941837,0.00003755623,0.000025092202,0.00020917281,0.0031970798,0.000026334474,0.00011640388,0.000039346432,0.0005467976,0.0014328372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012610739,0.00008613012,0.99310714,0.000040517523,0.000013278996,0.00008567986,0.0060135517,0.000117240445,0.000019676057,0.0000129237515,0.00048151874,0.000009804735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97220844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02779156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023935825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028281977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17366737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111651382","doi":"10.35631/irjsmi.25001","title":"LEGAL AND POLICY APPROACHES TOWARD REALIZATION OF THE RIGHT TO ACCESS LEGAL INFORMATION IN TANZANIA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Research Journal of Shariah Muamalat and Islam","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; Tanzania; Political science; Law; Legal research; Legislation; Constitution; Declaration; Public administration; Sociology; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.1701954998139366,"score_gpt":0.4602806771185765,"score_spread":0.2900851773046399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111651382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22385995,0.029147524,0.007382681,0.341039,0.0011245023,0.00045980603,0.00038619357,0.0001252611,0.39647505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9069584,0.0061797206,0.0064367647,0.028427292,0.00032936668,0.00025746957,0.0001072326,0.00002565897,0.05127801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975405,0.0007691185,0.00014076805,0.00022565361,0.00045028207,0.0008735867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972274,0.0012105829,0.00045994626,0.00011156726,0.00046508707,0.00052540534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036631813,0.0001591465,0.00013579347,0.0014779528,0.0044625336,0.0060398225,0.0009113143,0.003273642,0.0069706314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006442722,0.00030238702,0.00024726777,0.0011631952,0.005030917,0.0037617916,0.0041117994,0.0047190855,0.00045483588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015865955,0.00004395905,0.0025265529,0.00023193764,0.000004942211,0.001026398,0.018603843,0.00025217084,0.00095769094,0.949975,0.011572615,0.014789092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005340509,0.00016075546,0.020831367,0.0027803842,0.000040739338,0.0012803838,0.028522559,0.001211645,0.0015375065,0.16389112,0.7796064,0.000083647355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046497326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04962887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046497326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01042057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01822158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09245336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111751408","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: On The Web: Where to Find Canadian Case Law: Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; World Wide Web; Political science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.04737152299092879,"score_gpt":0.33106121221549234,"score_spread":0.28368968922456356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111751408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009042142,0.01049126,0.0011315619,0.06009489,0.0007264755,0.0001370582,0.008830302,0.0008155615,0.90873086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07852523,0.012624443,0.0030719829,0.009222323,0.00020763738,0.000101320096,0.0039423415,0.00067492196,0.8916299],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783736,0.00013399287,0.000068062676,0.0001417999,0.0013198279,0.0004989267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924959,0.0013419805,0.00016374415,0.00024470134,0.004297105,0.0014566296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015304915,0.0004996491,0.00039365195,0.005464447,0.0141898515,0.013096022,0.0014439896,0.0040221554,0.13246875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010195495,0.0005254864,0.00035765482,0.008281586,0.0035371112,0.0048943576,0.0029031013,0.0028599452,0.011032825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000093775,0.000018993087,0.0015007099,0.00009872066,0.0000037746934,0.0001595146,0.0015207127,0.00012913896,0.00006881869,0.044550486,0.9010678,0.050871946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055261503,0.0000028321506,0.003983867,0.00025532627,0.0000063294333,0.00006217661,0.0032643727,0.00026915953,0.00011931347,0.0044960743,0.9875064,0.000028667937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99361986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99693525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13246875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07881652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21509278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5718565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111844800","doi":"","title":"Universal Design in Legal Education in a Time of Covid-19","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Computer science; Virology; Political science; Business; Internet privacy; Medicine; Outbreak","score_opus":0.04233504090237689,"score_gpt":0.3785482809349264,"score_spread":0.3362132400325495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111844800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1846176,0.0035772754,0.05918149,0.22775301,0.0025245901,0.00035452028,0.000091154856,0.00073126715,0.52116907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8343687,0.00044831244,0.020195978,0.018704273,0.00016338915,0.00023173304,0.00003331929,0.00017409497,0.12568018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97908235,0.013600037,0.000614059,0.0015131197,0.0025718997,0.0026185322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688913,0.016284052,0.0010044648,0.0044175135,0.003313247,0.0060893004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027277527,0.00028661132,0.00045311856,0.001427691,0.012196999,0.013754004,0.0019469822,0.0061568916,0.026512003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030443968,0.0006063022,0.00056228926,0.0010870394,0.024539769,0.009920229,0.015654247,0.008187407,0.0018494301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037101705,0.00030927378,0.003509205,0.00011805097,0.000005173153,0.00019075524,0.028081313,0.0003355898,0.0003263215,0.85562235,0.02224259,0.08922225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055178512,0.00042228473,0.007798683,0.0010237055,0.000019019764,0.0004193005,0.04721454,0.0016199063,0.001826089,0.39284244,0.54669243,0.000066393855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009254346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02855731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027277527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017219966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036219407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1442591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111986684","doi":"","title":"An Essential Service: Public Libraries and their Role in Law and Society","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Law; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Service (business); Sociology; Law library; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Business; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.027145581499950288,"score_gpt":0.30052115540199287,"score_spread":0.2733755739020426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111986684","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04675313,0.015845824,0.0018872884,0.49555427,0.0016198845,0.000044234333,0.000054125037,0.00022502548,0.43801618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7803274,0.006766708,0.00076429313,0.053301588,0.00083927176,0.00007022721,0.00004783711,0.00012591026,0.15775684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837774,0.009317787,0.0002534016,0.0005187201,0.0022418017,0.0038908657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779254,0.0055822036,0.0013654688,0.0009789036,0.002538677,0.011609301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009042082,0.0004744534,0.0004523193,0.0030477177,0.039250713,0.039874595,0.0024657405,0.01006843,0.020236403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018157871,0.00048754283,0.00026899937,0.0034747238,0.061788134,0.024411742,0.022395233,0.010270051,0.0036702398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039244962,0.000106420266,0.0021108834,0.00012109079,0.000006721908,0.0003920501,0.15844575,0.000045369747,0.00012498611,0.67152876,0.12031226,0.04676653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010985832,0.000033057895,0.0012994233,0.00042672403,0.000007945313,0.00018765993,0.22357269,0.00005942057,0.00015895795,0.0473097,0.7269067,0.000026677055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09859563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16314225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09859563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03053374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058333855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22153884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112025018","doi":"","title":"The Covid-19 Pandemic, Accommodations and Legal Education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political science; Medicine; Virology; Outbreak; Disease","score_opus":0.09376631440134275,"score_gpt":0.43159947902198215,"score_spread":0.3378331646206394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112025018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040285837,0.0068620723,0.00084688823,0.4077615,0.0020910653,0.000030327843,0.0000909409,0.00003882421,0.54199255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6839928,0.00492374,0.000779077,0.07493871,0.0012910906,0.00006307518,0.00008937415,0.00006233843,0.23385987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995644,0.0022365376,0.00013988276,0.00024967256,0.00068039703,0.0010494088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922031,0.0036991115,0.0006328488,0.00040488923,0.0008364742,0.0022236388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004906907,0.00020456326,0.0002915001,0.0011462457,0.008928781,0.013943636,0.00093780324,0.0077253813,0.056627452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013296077,0.00016946423,0.00029585778,0.0011964024,0.012793102,0.008967731,0.009312722,0.0075425096,0.0029737642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016108328,0.00011172506,0.0023804933,0.000058722,0.0000023758064,0.00013639934,0.0070709926,0.00007658544,0.00008099146,0.8671717,0.07371471,0.049179208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023342473,0.00007569001,0.0062861023,0.000915909,0.000005114338,0.0001895522,0.062316835,0.0002559327,0.0002005382,0.19886413,0.73083574,0.00003108908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02615381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068187565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056627452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008094874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017576948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18943769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112187591","doi":"","title":"RECONCILIATION AND ETHICAL LAWYERING","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Indigenous; Conversation; Accountability; Commission; Political science; Public relations; Legal education; Legal ethics; Sociology; Law; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.061333698396253473,"score_gpt":0.3916847040508593,"score_spread":0.33035100565460584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112187591","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007998484,0.35266224,0.0071298513,0.33395663,0.0040914365,0.0001142096,0.00008518101,0.00006362483,0.2938984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6777624,0.17593811,0.0063416995,0.09716153,0.0026229194,0.00014646939,0.00012231513,0.00008712197,0.039817315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94428027,0.022474708,0.0019405336,0.002702293,0.021446202,0.0071560964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96855515,0.01308191,0.0030300904,0.0015625112,0.011956962,0.0018133521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033861455,0.0003929632,0.0008643929,0.0043881866,0.009799414,0.010274148,0.0032998715,0.0063704816,0.0038358364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047008228,0.000311786,0.00063531415,0.0032158485,0.036185198,0.0053445078,0.0067029046,0.008533859,0.00043371788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008282398,0.000008651187,0.00038602602,0.00064260623,0.000020283202,0.0001413231,0.006572153,0.0002448616,0.00007157399,0.910434,0.032820832,0.048649326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147894425,0.000019078532,0.0022509387,0.0030264293,0.00003976046,0.00031216157,0.0063521764,0.0001550134,0.00026832207,0.1189238,0.8685876,0.000049910283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53838557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6232406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46161443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04303965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12694624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92866594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112273460","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i0.6561","title":"The 2010 Amendments and Hryniak v Mauldin: The Perspective of the Lawyers Who Have Lived Them","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Perception; Psychology; History; Art","score_opus":0.12529564303135415,"score_gpt":0.399644406971222,"score_spread":0.27434876393986785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112273460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.853337,0.0039617526,0.00015020125,0.10491829,0.00024345242,0.000025972118,0.00006239015,0.000010565191,0.03729039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623401,0.0021070365,0.00009448234,0.021398505,0.000079308404,0.000017303453,0.000027035125,0.000011300072,0.013925035],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99323905,0.0021666158,0.00020582134,0.00036807873,0.0011816147,0.0028388086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99023706,0.004006631,0.0017653949,0.00015365254,0.00092230533,0.0029149875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042443355,0.00015241462,0.0003123301,0.0004774079,0.020949282,0.0071788835,0.0011429121,0.0049867183,0.0039720605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016501233,0.00035676328,0.00020329085,0.001037599,0.011130706,0.0033016033,0.0036994219,0.0071298694,0.00034047075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007949843,0.0002570596,0.053312317,0.0001101661,0.00001582337,0.0036718268,0.8655784,0.00010762314,0.001139078,0.018067399,0.031941384,0.025719367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009055745,0.00009293118,0.03035913,0.000178757,0.000009063876,0.0006905914,0.82191813,0.000037723996,0.00024771606,0.0009450236,0.14547467,0.00003721381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38573328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68604237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38573328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025283543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023802143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7669761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112291208","doi":"","title":"Teaching Essentially: Emergencies, Flight Instruction, and The Law School Classroom","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Law; Pedagogy; Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0199334529363735,"score_gpt":0.31698481750168755,"score_spread":0.29705136456531406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112291208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31751776,0.0155957015,0.0059711398,0.07882704,0.0014575865,0.00008727214,0.00015976558,0.00030182558,0.58008194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94475305,0.004116125,0.001293193,0.005214039,0.00031654598,0.000051053543,0.000061887775,0.000037291848,0.044156775],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990526,0.00048511042,0.000025962363,0.00009004983,0.00013258678,0.00021378972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998273,0.0007433275,0.00017669775,0.00006057684,0.00012340998,0.0006229384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012053646,0.00029358323,0.0002667491,0.00069553003,0.0042121047,0.006441254,0.0007462231,0.0022785193,0.021077806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031662378,0.00016144832,0.00020793582,0.00045308055,0.003493911,0.0036192327,0.0035400854,0.0036879824,0.0014842001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011881533,0.0033936827,0.022624534,0.00056045584,0.000021620554,0.0011845111,0.08326602,0.00095563766,0.0024266697,0.3444375,0.0898288,0.45118177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007705865,0.00050479005,0.052339762,0.0020559314,0.00003656453,0.0010701224,0.263513,0.0011041232,0.0021961755,0.10520922,0.57183987,0.000053429678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008862161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029526038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021077806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032615268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00816577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070512295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112509775","doi":"","title":"Narrative, Interrupted: Reflections on a First Semester as a New Law Professor Like no Other","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Law; Sociology; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.09966629206398467,"score_gpt":0.4360195255813699,"score_spread":0.3363532335173852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112509775","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16490895,0.003136035,0.005805,0.6447535,0.025306895,0.0003715565,0.0005235271,0.0003309233,0.15486361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60033524,0.0025699546,0.003004756,0.14713115,0.0044463906,0.00046841084,0.0003142029,0.0012537716,0.24047616],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98904675,0.006522415,0.00019648223,0.0010543338,0.0012083035,0.0019717629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980338,0.0074073854,0.00114994,0.0006562247,0.0020120377,0.008436348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008443371,0.0013237958,0.0011982082,0.0013747717,0.04587954,0.02516976,0.0056617814,0.019070549,0.018930957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048724994,0.0012839185,0.0011221616,0.0015710719,0.02040679,0.015541012,0.018324213,0.056492496,0.0046742405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098181816,0.00021795346,0.0006272048,0.000075601645,0.000012925135,0.004403795,0.8147419,0.00009397118,0.00050682365,0.027780294,0.14598791,0.005453414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013997628,0.00004735919,0.00045806903,0.00017254503,0.000005408912,0.0006625191,0.7232423,0.000074976124,0.00018065498,0.002744674,0.27236316,0.000034390105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018978244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046365533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04587954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012321444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009637075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08939874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112584853","doi":"10.32920/22229509","title":"Towards Implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action in Law Schools: A Settler Harm Reduction Approach to Racial Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Indigenous Peoples and Indigenous Legal Orders in Canadian Legal Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canadian Bar Association; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Indigenous; Prejudice (legal term); Political science; Harm; Law; Commission; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07295356932481475,"score_gpt":0.3892679816070466,"score_spread":0.3163144122822319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112584853","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10601342,0.0019219861,0.012476034,0.7501516,0.0013768381,0.00097374676,0.000054657226,0.0002459546,0.12678581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8453887,0.001607786,0.031797975,0.07831242,0.00028240823,0.00046586315,0.00006639633,0.000096846474,0.041981675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9690291,0.010719271,0.0006616587,0.0015951649,0.008521589,0.009473197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686291,0.007239246,0.0022148911,0.0009168543,0.008901045,0.012098819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036195602,0.0006280225,0.0005576619,0.0034367612,0.05654927,0.019708522,0.004494169,0.010894381,0.0049524014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035444736,0.000658127,0.0010008891,0.0018672042,0.035083856,0.0065377844,0.012571026,0.015871095,0.00047610296],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051117335,0.00083672156,0.019110033,0.00050862477,0.000053333268,0.0007652979,0.31835258,0.0014500369,0.0024834913,0.3646787,0.11778173,0.1739283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119903154,0.00024021065,0.06678592,0.0012277743,0.00013448445,0.00019224091,0.3750933,0.0026606868,0.002863738,0.08665644,0.46365872,0.0003666843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9395459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9691319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85723794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14276204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5003346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99427456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112636103","doi":"","title":"Analyzing the Effects of Covid-19 on Legal Pedagogy and Scholarship: A Hurly-Burly in Five-And-a-Half Parts (A Collage Within a Collage?)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Higher education; Visual arts; Art; Sociology; Aesthetics; Pedagogy; Political science; Medicine; Law; Virology","score_opus":0.03317516120939109,"score_gpt":0.38579000321101936,"score_spread":0.3526148420016283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112636103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.968936,0.0008784586,0.0006422296,0.0071853977,0.0001760399,0.00016902393,0.0003912873,0.000029719116,0.021591833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936824,0.0001853029,0.00034027826,0.0007155614,0.00007587936,0.0002153614,0.00023609777,0.00003166551,0.004517407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95751905,0.025379118,0.0013217288,0.0029241706,0.007750794,0.005105204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7538152,0.173818,0.027643355,0.009459392,0.018086161,0.017178018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03264241,0.00057994795,0.0012750189,0.0028926863,0.0071370252,0.009632347,0.0043607047,0.0026880084,0.02417938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1573683,0.00055989553,0.0014589187,0.004262426,0.008765828,0.007243358,0.017142788,0.0066117845,0.0019391478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030331959,0.008921889,0.7976819,0.00036178422,0.00092088873,0.00030540102,0.036812954,0.0011909478,0.0007466758,0.06397169,0.012109572,0.073943086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037372913,0.0025833216,0.8775433,0.00064495736,0.0010350625,0.00004911841,0.08709806,0.0032701592,0.001803437,0.008786665,0.01669317,0.00011915604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0634867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10356262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0634867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01354014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01677549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17263162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114099894","doi":"10.7202/1071576ar","title":"The Good Life of Teaching: An Ethics of Professional Practice (Chris Higgins)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Engineering ethics; Professional ethics; Medical education; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.12649509721241825,"score_gpt":0.47395778231008034,"score_spread":0.3474626850976621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114099894","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011138523,0.10642118,0.002183293,0.8386406,0.005545171,0.00003970966,0.000014530364,0.000024976256,0.046016704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24943231,0.1716874,0.01173684,0.40780884,0.012639371,0.0005251804,0.000043920216,0.000260367,0.14586583],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809905,0.012883844,0.0003773032,0.0007821969,0.004037457,0.0009287347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867792,0.008244572,0.0008688191,0.00045342123,0.0017649246,0.0018889706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010206563,0.0005139528,0.00047495498,0.0010594109,0.00739322,0.009078742,0.001072272,0.008116355,0.0025526881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020239633,0.00058127305,0.00031522315,0.0010564579,0.028996231,0.011382166,0.005083482,0.014345658,0.0010398409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022650727,0.000033698474,0.00020952783,0.00023877811,0.0000071214827,0.00023163219,0.014049465,0.00014991111,0.00014282999,0.38955492,0.55669934,0.03866018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025407913,0.000025056042,0.0005797731,0.0013772001,0.0000056188046,0.00043205576,0.012736565,0.00017338352,0.00018427172,0.25474125,0.72967863,0.000040847997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024325497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035256576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024325497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00820748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021335842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05954975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114586317","doi":"10.7202/1073426ar","title":"Is There Something to be Said for Getting No Respect? Comment on J.R. Coombs's \"Respect for Law: An Educational Object?\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.15848349894968095,"score_gpt":0.4477603968861283,"score_spread":0.28927689793644734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114586317","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000165203,0.0014933761,0.00006488695,0.9871274,0.0065345787,0.000008295889,0.000054469336,0.000026378339,0.0045253946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023818791,0.00080215966,0.00008931021,0.9840741,0.0039046782,0.000034907036,0.000027205415,0.000028091448,0.008657757],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98978806,0.0019742525,0.0006869219,0.0011823596,0.005182595,0.0011858491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97506183,0.012190271,0.001849339,0.0006007996,0.00778828,0.0025095257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007018369,0.0011463342,0.0018091135,0.0011725985,0.009533344,0.006787376,0.0047753355,0.055474624,0.017049793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035422035,0.0010313528,0.0015937771,0.0015425553,0.010728955,0.0075296746,0.0039242045,0.048974287,0.014143448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017926719,0.000007855519,0.00012432683,0.00004627903,0.0000030975434,0.00012229677,0.0004991405,0.000013667901,0.00006304652,0.004119932,0.9936678,0.0013145955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047188205,0.000032169923,0.0023075887,0.00056902523,0.00002636618,0.00032629396,0.0044648866,0.00010413319,0.00031691403,0.008182181,0.983545,0.00007827561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07359271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13766116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07359271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00630879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009930486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14632875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115717593","doi":"","title":"Witness Protection: A Comparative Analysis of Indian and Australian Legislation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Law; Forensic psychology; Political science; Legislation; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04130882149692963,"score_gpt":0.3725990134083027,"score_spread":0.3312901919113731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115717593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.948078,0.0024947086,0.00020790359,0.0010086284,0.000037977636,0.00007881758,0.00020615311,0.000014258478,0.047873594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99296254,0.0019677181,0.00021658321,0.00032091816,0.000020704696,0.00003738158,0.00016780171,0.000011333147,0.0042951233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950014,0.0014098882,0.00028149426,0.0003046112,0.001911968,0.0010907414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888093,0.004737565,0.0029382983,0.00038663336,0.0022154208,0.00091280637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033668317,0.00018832226,0.00038782292,0.0062793065,0.003085289,0.0030662068,0.0013312832,0.000656153,0.007511786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014080319,0.00029803003,0.0005508313,0.009185211,0.0018781706,0.0016195748,0.0022891413,0.0015273002,0.00063633855],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009813092,0.0013255075,0.419574,0.0029629217,0.00037540146,0.0043821065,0.28892502,0.0004126932,0.0032732778,0.084136754,0.010053536,0.18359753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011840331,0.0004313612,0.85199773,0.00063078705,0.00020741258,0.00066195533,0.106144,0.0003252293,0.0004995481,0.000591996,0.03846124,0.000036866964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067625165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11599746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067625165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061082984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004893904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13446307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116749468","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: WRIT 215 - Legal Research: Canadian Encyclopedic Digest","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Writ; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.20124309424553927,"score_gpt":0.45141738506806517,"score_spread":0.2501742908225259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116749468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007017337,0.10771825,0.000686773,0.023445277,0.012826798,0.00025769023,0.013362235,0.0010361293,0.83996516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003540915,0.08338576,0.0014246667,0.0033207554,0.0014491004,0.0001616458,0.0072721783,0.00048286896,0.8989621],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787796,0.00017307284,0.00015805871,0.00010433502,0.0014086242,0.0002779374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940533,0.00096068054,0.00016341111,0.00031483299,0.0035846422,0.0009231852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003234879,0.0012884493,0.0011436271,0.013993096,0.00475697,0.011568674,0.0013571694,0.002982178,0.2424801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070785196,0.00072592654,0.0005654398,0.019803664,0.0030685004,0.0039219293,0.0034222046,0.0026085032,0.06376303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064929477,0.000006035493,0.00007228959,0.00025132362,0.0000015619049,0.0000145302665,0.00006955903,0.000039427436,0.00003689203,0.0056567346,0.9631296,0.030715557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011092475,0.0000011162333,0.0003119637,0.00035348433,0.0000012114737,0.000011303108,0.00011986474,0.000014515402,0.000019112897,0.00053076603,0.99863106,0.0000044538674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7847723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8833516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2424801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033624955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10421043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8111768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117556844","doi":"10.7202/1073406ar","title":"Technology and Justice (George Grant)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Art; Law; Art history; Computer science","score_opus":0.06413063215275941,"score_gpt":0.369466850259669,"score_spread":0.3053362181069096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117556844","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015688012,0.12926057,0.0005390256,0.6334582,0.05049285,0.000034212542,0.000065573695,0.00003586189,0.18454489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029417766,0.043269046,0.0005435105,0.22897214,0.02656011,0.000093505754,0.00003153363,0.00008770518,0.6710247],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981597,0.00053917244,0.00007556623,0.00037687286,0.0006367027,0.00021198472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822336,0.0009001337,0.000084205,0.00010179676,0.00035435305,0.00033601857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021738189,0.00080663495,0.0006407834,0.0012943317,0.00585102,0.0064749583,0.0009644378,0.012715445,0.016883701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005575363,0.00041597986,0.00034800143,0.0011581326,0.0048783314,0.005751444,0.0039352598,0.011105876,0.004914088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071649274,0.000030160552,0.00015013707,0.00006512282,0.000005121573,0.0000693086,0.0008159294,0.000043743912,0.00006464944,0.14772749,0.82587343,0.025147684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005073287,0.0000056494473,0.00033233472,0.00020022239,0.0000034605457,0.00008955533,0.00062577083,0.000034588582,0.000051573512,0.030299308,0.9683436,0.000008811617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020213159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053236593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020213159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035230117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004811597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0564816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117990781","doi":"10.7202/1073282ar","title":"The Limits of Reason: Indeterminacy in Law, Education, and Morality (John A. Eisenberg)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Morality; Philosophy; Law; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.07256727998325842,"score_gpt":0.3967481582516703,"score_spread":0.3241808782684119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117990781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005275296,0.3741634,0.009743824,0.48996943,0.004256268,0.000021499201,0.0000552472,0.000052310737,0.116462715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4736716,0.35707432,0.01049092,0.05499889,0.017157221,0.00020656118,0.000061092105,0.0001467386,0.086192586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980258,0.0010729356,0.00007348298,0.0002717827,0.00046545055,0.000090626425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99391395,0.005076306,0.0002744221,0.00018399002,0.0003690625,0.00018220683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003968348,0.0005367737,0.000634046,0.001543265,0.0026483953,0.0064588124,0.00075096637,0.002542447,0.00265039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008799331,0.00045859563,0.00043562372,0.0015815572,0.02009356,0.009188187,0.0023782447,0.0062049692,0.0005768055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011278535,0.000015186178,0.00019859159,0.00006857005,0.000009224852,0.00003990234,0.0010867023,0.00051580765,0.000054502954,0.9335681,0.047711123,0.016721047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005970093,0.000003584405,0.00022063282,0.00019787,0.0000046079967,0.000031878975,0.00039169073,0.00032498853,0.000038931823,0.93695575,0.061815783,0.00000841061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007685422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009623889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007685422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003892792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040045762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028244317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118765194","doi":"10.4324/9780203831427-9","title":"(De-)sexing the woman lawyer: Rosemary Hunter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Legal profession; Dominance (genetics); White (mutation); Law; Middle class; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.11220260628662289,"score_gpt":0.38135311026578567,"score_spread":0.2691505039791628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118765194","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036549304,0.09093717,0.0007018948,0.7486565,0.011458622,0.0000799329,0.000042063195,0.000058407484,0.111516096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27051738,0.120662905,0.0016687694,0.30391178,0.008328321,0.00016506296,0.000037725877,0.00021303406,0.29449505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849427,0.0008735851,0.000028693812,0.0001652631,0.00025844807,0.00017975036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987174,0.00070388895,0.00009748119,0.000038837807,0.00013314077,0.00030928565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021707243,0.00033282916,0.0003212904,0.0005301885,0.0088091055,0.0032033802,0.0012493856,0.0031761455,0.0063979407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005292413,0.00032019446,0.00012851844,0.00046049128,0.007699012,0.005000562,0.0029767037,0.008398483,0.0016069768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038789436,0.00013367462,0.0012506412,0.00027899217,0.0000084222465,0.003471857,0.14089864,0.00006798648,0.00033041777,0.047495753,0.7343848,0.0716399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075938083,0.000053059226,0.0011931389,0.0006727773,0.000004823623,0.0022642165,0.08490363,0.00006457803,0.00013244487,0.006171123,0.9045111,0.000021622369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023379121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06688522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023379121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001945404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041708704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04648608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121138099","doi":"10.1353/ctr.0.0031","title":"Guantánamo : Using a Play-Reading to Teach Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Embodied cognition; Charter; Reading (process); Law; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics education; Visual arts; Psychology; Art; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05754018756000266,"score_gpt":0.3973370824145781,"score_spread":0.3397968948545754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121138099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15926632,0.008179744,0.0107541,0.033516962,0.0038540093,0.0003975109,0.00021835271,0.0008382665,0.7829747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5826703,0.009535626,0.028894242,0.009544938,0.00043120267,0.00040057316,0.00032321966,0.00038553873,0.36781448],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977154,0.0000752338,0.0000040182035,0.000025678111,0.00005026447,0.00007326882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999811,0.00006176997,0.000011832348,0.00001245931,0.000032884156,0.00007015594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007542842,0.00056741195,0.00013762839,0.00049115904,0.004545641,0.0013674677,0.0006849755,0.0011597605,0.007883946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007751886,0.0001487101,0.000216335,0.00038033116,0.002066163,0.0007481976,0.0013957934,0.0017877956,0.0007349723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030493483,0.00065783376,0.00681438,0.00088960433,0.000027211065,0.003453544,0.14511615,0.00054566405,0.018738532,0.11605133,0.22844824,0.47895256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005980874,0.00021962836,0.009586205,0.00027208976,0.000021571099,0.0007706024,0.04830578,0.0006081101,0.0023465238,0.0055937283,0.93218946,0.000026437858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070017666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35374847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070017666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023048269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037444222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13922024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121174463","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4363","title":"LAWYERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE FAIRNESS OF JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Duty; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Psychology; Helpfulness; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06152644705459672,"score_gpt":0.4113544472456721,"score_spread":0.3498280001910754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121174463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871904,0.00025003403,0.0004802187,0.0027259665,0.00002438318,0.000037801692,0.000009192762,0.0000061981054,0.0092758695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998803,0.00011384146,0.00015580583,0.0003183192,0.00001569228,0.000009579938,0.000005298946,0.0000021635292,0.0005763183],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97312826,0.014305025,0.0014027464,0.0010453106,0.0071389377,0.0029797931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9289958,0.03814278,0.01651287,0.0020740412,0.008540112,0.005734448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02326722,0.00019952357,0.0004164548,0.0021542443,0.005411433,0.005794244,0.0009832802,0.0023314827,0.0031134095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.118874766,0.00036305463,0.00033468226,0.0010463763,0.0070093223,0.0021885347,0.0028218895,0.002230455,0.0002390214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071338867,0.00066651887,0.22704111,0.0002056092,0.00012970305,0.0017125711,0.6917379,0.0009263764,0.0041057104,0.011606936,0.0037070627,0.05744722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023532666,0.00089483836,0.31472725,0.00046228417,0.00012433516,0.001067103,0.641876,0.0026165892,0.0010152736,0.008168627,0.028584361,0.00022802138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07881059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09524815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07881059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009080771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008388569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15670371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121181845","doi":"","title":"The Civil Servant's Role in the Implementation of Constitutional Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Civil servant; Political science; Civil rights; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.025707573705034244,"score_gpt":0.38320730599416003,"score_spread":0.3574997322891258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121181845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15181954,0.0007066622,0.012134408,0.07029924,0.00045927777,0.00012125279,0.000037868846,0.00007756863,0.76434404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782882,0.00013552152,0.001155925,0.003437012,0.00008555562,0.000031172265,0.000007326727,0.000024844927,0.016834341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777876,0.012851855,0.0006546174,0.0014837359,0.0028303242,0.0043918393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682377,0.020913,0.0023466393,0.0024543083,0.0024779066,0.0035703948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033423584,0.00033072167,0.00058464403,0.0011029479,0.011697893,0.014875335,0.0018710403,0.007723491,0.012052343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03828586,0.00043007446,0.00049270975,0.0010721806,0.038242307,0.0055219335,0.007408286,0.010434381,0.0014124492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019314426,0.000036215828,0.00096773624,0.000012982548,0.0000048577886,0.00019154501,0.01472074,0.00010044576,0.00030166752,0.9769216,0.0020517586,0.004671175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009126081,0.00019984318,0.0057386113,0.00032419723,0.00004088881,0.0005835238,0.03634979,0.0022767973,0.0020801194,0.7555867,0.19665587,0.00007245002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012660038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014678702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033423584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005961199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023119496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17676294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121384998","doi":"10.15496/publikation-53410","title":"Barriers to the profession : inaction in Ontario, Canada and its consequences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Diversity (politics); Limiting; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02340221597623582,"score_gpt":0.29007355610050634,"score_spread":0.2666713401242705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121384998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96763355,0.0013570773,0.00009342684,0.013478617,0.00007751838,0.0000678221,0.00042300113,0.00001337704,0.016855592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919018,0.0010716083,0.00006642675,0.00082736986,0.000016914697,0.000020171701,0.0001591604,0.000010247723,0.005926232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946919,0.00038741628,0.00016590035,0.00028839783,0.001984063,0.0024822985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849997,0.0009839424,0.0031200678,0.0003129128,0.0038227981,0.006760538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021786026,0.0002986108,0.00054621324,0.0020537132,0.020330956,0.0043839365,0.0026434022,0.001515481,0.0055111554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008584735,0.00046146507,0.0004832978,0.0043372847,0.0081088655,0.0018755684,0.0048238854,0.003123141,0.00032066248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023729943,0.00038106117,0.7223469,0.00027036824,0.000053882643,0.0013729464,0.20337364,0.00032660866,0.0005910423,0.013537049,0.017884709,0.03962451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020423542,0.00006432123,0.7863372,0.00042442261,0.000025011472,0.00013271684,0.18637964,0.0003144153,0.00011728103,0.00072500994,0.02540937,0.000050178438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12572959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12572959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1858809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9122363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121398693","doi":"10.5703/1288284317168","title":"Wrangling Weirdness: Lessons Learned from Academic Law Library Collections","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Negotiation; Law library; Computer science; Face (sociological concept); Academic library; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Public relations; Business; Law; Political science; Library science; Sociology","score_opus":0.25928821702218807,"score_gpt":0.429889893641421,"score_spread":0.17060167661923292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121398693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2467315,0.020899031,0.07986608,0.3106547,0.002311498,0.000916196,0.00045404417,0.0017740075,0.33639288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8039321,0.019011056,0.09396116,0.019555828,0.0010124551,0.00034880437,0.0005554801,0.0014968377,0.060126513],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98411083,0.010369543,0.0005789461,0.00092454586,0.0027826459,0.0012334965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.946382,0.03304672,0.0015912909,0.006516283,0.008821771,0.0036419437],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021376906,0.0006416396,0.0007716299,0.0045910603,0.012622755,0.018976253,0.005910318,0.0033676976,0.01488024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071123675,0.00084473414,0.00090590556,0.0052243024,0.01398437,0.035678197,0.012386112,0.00614864,0.0028682044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010047501,0.00055751484,0.013624138,0.0011754786,0.000048908336,0.0015953238,0.24250811,0.0013933798,0.0005636341,0.107098676,0.077877596,0.5534568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004448488,0.0001477981,0.008060135,0.0025291524,0.00004913449,0.0013178518,0.3634446,0.0021650149,0.0018187742,0.141116,0.47916403,0.00014296561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042678118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09797946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9810237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008236717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015190625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11305326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121400957","doi":"","title":"SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES AND JUDICIAL ROLE: THE SCAFFOLDING FOR EXPANDED THINKING ABOUT JUDICIAL ETHICS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Mediation; Political science; Judicial opinion; Settlement (finance); Action (physics); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.10485530194972174,"score_gpt":0.4058283538600859,"score_spread":0.30097305191036416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121400957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12903515,0.0055873916,0.03503628,0.11378649,0.00083005166,0.00020323065,0.000070720576,0.00024200627,0.71520865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747161,0.0011484419,0.0076545742,0.0028279228,0.00011650391,0.000050133516,0.000023323411,0.00006440341,0.013398499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97495884,0.015763568,0.0005423826,0.0013924045,0.003931375,0.0034114015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94526833,0.03567916,0.003963513,0.0033516516,0.007179277,0.00455815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026327709,0.00045478236,0.00054947,0.0025815915,0.017532721,0.020294406,0.0031737718,0.0045044376,0.010299504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06410196,0.0006180701,0.0005074769,0.0020199749,0.05289658,0.012557692,0.008576817,0.007780293,0.0006043147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032665168,0.00003953198,0.0026863192,0.0001219401,0.000007813255,0.00040095721,0.16477418,0.0005597275,0.0006581743,0.77963793,0.00792264,0.04315821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058593327,0.000054947304,0.015522145,0.0010588113,0.000046090845,0.00026053813,0.20785323,0.002067977,0.0008736277,0.42727154,0.34473985,0.00019258753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39291468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5997738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39291468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035137717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06341338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78125536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121411357","doi":"","title":"Safe and Inclusive Schools – Expensive … Quality Education – Priceless, for Everything Else There's Lawyers!","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Quality (philosophy); Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.07027031261388826,"score_gpt":0.44703120078446124,"score_spread":0.37676088817057296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121411357","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009409307,0.01603791,0.020074038,0.69778085,0.00559773,0.00005511651,0.000071360635,0.00032727115,0.2506465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4703632,0.024917763,0.026396044,0.22098196,0.0050676335,0.00016261337,0.00015782342,0.0003847686,0.25156814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98965085,0.0023123368,0.00027594707,0.0006318988,0.0060485117,0.0010805444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98971975,0.0035475465,0.0013155335,0.0011553556,0.0020243754,0.002237529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049265455,0.00047599585,0.00057777006,0.0012481654,0.006887289,0.014700062,0.0011766718,0.0055095195,0.016511125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015430274,0.00041979557,0.0003493961,0.0011870764,0.020913674,0.021388846,0.008994362,0.008382776,0.0039403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002639919,0.00008214971,0.0011308779,0.00018030904,0.000016623295,0.00010376777,0.0048999297,0.00020811,0.00033934572,0.7721375,0.12076613,0.10010885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001150112,0.000042513035,0.0016694786,0.00041952857,0.000010965196,0.00015682798,0.0066648265,0.000104385304,0.00035084996,0.2552931,0.73524565,0.000030296153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0115753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03631189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016511125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006937246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010151324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055235147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121471502","doi":"","title":"No Toilets in Park","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Curriculum; Sociology; Theme (computing); Pedagogy; Politics; Legal education; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04796488995796207,"score_gpt":0.36687485666668146,"score_spread":0.3189099667087194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121471502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1843161,0.00093199377,0.0022053877,0.041023992,0.0011278131,0.00010466028,0.0002719444,0.00023895211,0.76977915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6439781,0.0006927134,0.0010158212,0.004439219,0.000047612015,0.000042451407,0.00012921025,0.00008802774,0.349567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870384,0.0001985326,0.000016640553,0.00014865323,0.00037025163,0.0005619902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896324,0.00011352318,0.000072044066,0.000046500594,0.00025018642,0.00055453856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005809164,0.00016804918,0.0001438674,0.00029692057,0.008073722,0.0037585602,0.0008555578,0.0009148686,0.02355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023065556,0.00014880755,0.00014467022,0.00031511916,0.004567506,0.0022275397,0.0034540899,0.0021554786,0.0017466124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006902261,0.00012410036,0.010579185,0.00018677587,0.000007292455,0.0007202452,0.07685002,0.00036922877,0.0024510238,0.42345458,0.3341256,0.15106292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006745616,0.00006166801,0.0070391158,0.00010243279,0.000004451535,0.00018262482,0.028805872,0.0001429263,0.00073169847,0.0056767045,0.9572258,0.000020000616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32218218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6862519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32218218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011338936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020894397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64061373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121492773","doi":"10.21991/c97m23","title":"On The Trinity Western University Controversy: An Argument for a Christian Law School in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.030378373017318522,"score_gpt":0.2897247159256101,"score_spread":0.2593463429082916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121492773","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09907925,0.0037332543,0.001228419,0.5438058,0.0016781557,0.00011646215,0.00013063272,0.00006791856,0.35016003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76763576,0.0014222587,0.0009020773,0.1432163,0.0004371081,0.00007180306,0.000061046536,0.000111162604,0.0861424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880576,0.0019004166,0.00017240427,0.00093960785,0.0031251176,0.005804877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803656,0.0049132234,0.00066079124,0.0005814248,0.004620981,0.0088579785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078076287,0.00038086195,0.0006473273,0.002262023,0.06830553,0.015597392,0.0034410541,0.015679853,0.013510696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025328267,0.00069645,0.0007165768,0.003091684,0.03179121,0.0044195764,0.008250131,0.01790095,0.0006655542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069823276,0.000055248456,0.003503057,0.00005530423,0.000017427574,0.00047700354,0.017499665,0.00028291726,0.000207478,0.8644865,0.10318622,0.010159363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021328374,0.000056964658,0.018992934,0.00061358523,0.000105313986,0.00021228088,0.055204384,0.0016229423,0.0007490488,0.10142474,0.82051027,0.0002943801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9882605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99362755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14982364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14982364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30147856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121499518","doi":"","title":"Canadian Civil Justice: Relief in Small and Simple Matters in an Age of Efficiency","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Austerity; Political science; Optimism; Public administration; Civil procedure; Law; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.019052548313989445,"score_gpt":0.32477865651340987,"score_spread":0.3057261081994204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121499518","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06697236,0.021256493,0.001842555,0.62828314,0.0018417434,0.0000928133,0.0006173693,0.00013814906,0.2789553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.835821,0.017728655,0.0033021197,0.068667054,0.00047606172,0.00006299288,0.00038032947,0.00012974268,0.073432036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901231,0.0011915193,0.00018092101,0.0006143749,0.003807562,0.0040824856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863442,0.0019827522,0.0005839193,0.00038243178,0.004746631,0.0059600505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003959548,0.00044314683,0.00068505085,0.0022044121,0.03235417,0.013432205,0.0026951612,0.0042498424,0.019550504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021091018,0.0003363658,0.000494361,0.004877558,0.016548513,0.0048824972,0.0067561828,0.0062969457,0.0010126657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007411748,0.00007555712,0.01378785,0.0004968186,0.000050333285,0.0011007527,0.03011105,0.00066457904,0.00033347952,0.42477387,0.3990454,0.1294862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000397027,0.00004166632,0.03326506,0.00082098535,0.000051644485,0.0004126422,0.062179465,0.00065895217,0.00036220066,0.038691297,0.86331105,0.00016532904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99422836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8202545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17974548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3750926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.951379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121584940","doi":"","title":"Legal Feminism and the Post-Racism Fantasy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Scholarship; Oppression; Feminism; Colonialism; Sociology; Gender studies; Intersectionality; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.020197843148441443,"score_gpt":0.2799167041765076,"score_spread":0.2597188610280662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121584940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09383622,0.012817596,0.0029085116,0.32899505,0.0010765477,0.000020723293,0.00003866698,0.00004936337,0.5602573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93931764,0.0019669628,0.00060208666,0.009486331,0.00025961766,0.000020672946,0.000010325818,0.00003563248,0.048300683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925829,0.0042361203,0.00009084455,0.000447163,0.0014777308,0.0011651159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99538296,0.0028710307,0.00040680438,0.00020683173,0.00057668495,0.0005556593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006523222,0.00034986893,0.00024896843,0.0015268363,0.02636288,0.01098642,0.0012032395,0.0045707,0.0050424943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078637535,0.00025648234,0.00022215841,0.0008781914,0.08897282,0.0062288176,0.005176468,0.006097163,0.00045414272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066673947,0.000012895767,0.00038566737,0.000018035598,0.000001290761,0.00031147077,0.13753873,0.000032037977,0.0001198086,0.8484692,0.007162844,0.005941506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012708474,0.000024970319,0.0016185011,0.0002476021,0.0000036792112,0.0007587177,0.16362646,0.00015533647,0.00038764055,0.18859003,0.64454705,0.000027405367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10988789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1469528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10988789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019550135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011337134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21849656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121619201","doi":"10.11575/sppp.v4i0.42359","title":"Rhetoric and Realities: What Independence of the Bar Requires of Lawyer Regulation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Independence (probability theory); Bar (unit); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Physics; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.383449993403467,"score_gpt":0.6198468659399735,"score_spread":0.23639687253650649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121619201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0538435,0.0055367425,0.022795428,0.34382138,0.0013020835,0.00007975802,0.00006802685,0.00008957674,0.5724635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94950897,0.0016833286,0.0034830335,0.02601702,0.00070046954,0.000083998995,0.000032554934,0.00007452041,0.018416155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97010607,0.01192352,0.00088594086,0.003087754,0.009892578,0.004104174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9632046,0.024454532,0.0024284648,0.0020060446,0.0067052003,0.0012010589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022112072,0.00041888215,0.0007767214,0.0027104395,0.017762495,0.022546917,0.003352201,0.011965912,0.0033471675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047521394,0.00082669273,0.0008537471,0.0020892452,0.08194561,0.014295029,0.005541694,0.014286787,0.0007756903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007157967,0.0000064854353,0.00024431248,0.0000320994,0.0000031648628,0.00004627743,0.014489316,0.00006423545,0.00010408194,0.9812494,0.0014117119,0.0023418046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000438936,0.000049228678,0.0054841265,0.0009506935,0.00006989451,0.00021487116,0.03999753,0.0012396367,0.0010089694,0.70229536,0.24852447,0.000121300836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28539315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20061292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28539315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044478618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04098111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.567464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121658135","doi":"","title":"FINDING A PATH TO RECONCILIATION: MANDATORY INDIGENOUS LAW, ANISHINAABE PEDAGOGY, AND ACADEMIC FREEDOM","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Jurisprudence; Commission; Constitution; Academic freedom; Political science; Subject (documents); Sociology; Law reform; Higher education","score_opus":0.11775137750545771,"score_gpt":0.4637681197493144,"score_spread":0.3460167422438567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121658135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25678894,0.0054236054,0.017615885,0.28237098,0.0006813204,0.00011639683,0.000023547262,0.00008375894,0.43689552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822108,0.0006404787,0.0031631156,0.0044042957,0.00005610308,0.000039357445,0.000007111135,0.000014614497,0.009464105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99123025,0.0049520493,0.00019280714,0.00045571843,0.0017370004,0.0014321504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99287635,0.00403518,0.00086268334,0.00042412477,0.000732767,0.0010688228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010767383,0.00019063459,0.00030441297,0.0010148939,0.014562337,0.011627046,0.0015787963,0.0042659733,0.0042213527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015784131,0.00024217578,0.00029798204,0.00089776266,0.03917385,0.008885412,0.012271177,0.006442832,0.00031995674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010419576,0.0000948444,0.0018360739,0.00006781922,0.000003256186,0.00015384243,0.09030897,0.00010615699,0.00020970672,0.88048816,0.002821674,0.023899037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027251128,0.000090405316,0.009952086,0.0008500707,0.000023210281,0.00038547762,0.1973455,0.0009222816,0.0019726434,0.587949,0.20040618,0.000075910255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082909435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2026123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082909435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013908271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04415678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16485369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121688782","doi":"","title":"Constructivism, Embedded Liberalism and Anti-Dumping - Canadian Public Interest Inquiry as Case Study of Embedded Liberalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Constructivism (international relations); Political science; Economic liberalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Political economy; Philosophy; Law; Politics; International relations","score_opus":0.11531810960615771,"score_gpt":0.3866063074113959,"score_spread":0.27128819780523816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121688782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.554517,0.0008810036,0.0059854104,0.018767847,0.00007683888,0.00023113994,0.00008141408,0.000030002107,0.41942936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99072134,0.0001493783,0.000992969,0.0003655304,0.000004362067,0.000037389444,0.000012888954,0.00001286129,0.0077033374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890625,0.0053338055,0.00017298941,0.00068815914,0.0022850626,0.0024575137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871284,0.008341247,0.00060742546,0.0009606876,0.001976996,0.0009853633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011206977,0.0005104141,0.00052574044,0.0033827897,0.038364943,0.013212263,0.0025222518,0.0040355334,0.0034923938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013666595,0.0003333544,0.00052763656,0.006705,0.05741972,0.004986538,0.007125324,0.006733346,0.00015136808],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026155107,0.00005400493,0.0029178814,0.00004047939,0.0000050105814,0.0007691121,0.2604963,0.0002153919,0.00022319406,0.7261548,0.0016001194,0.007497503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004798539,0.00002916621,0.010931345,0.00025898215,0.00003570402,0.00046778665,0.7236802,0.0016632399,0.0011211212,0.15386342,0.10783066,0.000070350085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89297307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.929177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107026935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08678902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09489888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6297014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121780508","doi":"10.1086/698435","title":"The Legal Academy’s Ideological Uniformity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University at Buffalo; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Loyola Marymount University; Western New England University; University of Connecticut; City University of New York; Wake Forest University; Loyola University Chicago; Georgetown University; University of Denver; State University of New York; University of Minnesota; Washington University in St. Louis; Boston College; Harvard University; University of Miami; York University; Northwestern University; University of Washington; Northern Illinois University; Washington and Lee University; University of the Pacific; University of Southern California; Santa Clara University; Yale University","keywords":"Ideology; Law; Legal profession; Directory; Politics; Political science; Balance (ability); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13029258447610423,"score_gpt":0.4639349417944505,"score_spread":0.33364235731834624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121780508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9532182,0.00020451914,0.0008463939,0.0008038146,0.000024754285,0.00001213942,0.00010713527,0.000012239509,0.04477081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991322,0.000039448227,0.00014204864,0.00004817734,0.000050774695,0.0000071382033,0.00005172471,0.000003441879,0.00052505796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605125,0.0009152355,0.00024835806,0.0004563417,0.001555826,0.0007729144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824388,0.0061169392,0.0057205763,0.0011869627,0.0018561261,0.0026805343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037026992,0.00013579114,0.0004207934,0.0078119263,0.002106528,0.004074429,0.00058948604,0.0006243453,0.00808063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019740231,0.00018216258,0.00025956082,0.0036802131,0.0027474875,0.002834036,0.0039477968,0.0011201297,0.00084986334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042420998,0.00034110426,0.8259859,0.00008293103,0.00014148703,0.00035907116,0.015667323,0.00092652265,0.004203538,0.07548495,0.0020355468,0.07434746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044102257,0.00018231772,0.9589932,0.00006411928,0.000022311155,0.0003245587,0.009136623,0.0009056543,0.00086912507,0.02019292,0.009238822,0.000026269367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011615969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013057018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00808063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013459129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009979032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027032435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121809023","doi":"","title":"How to Build a Better Bar Exam","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memorization; Multiple choice; Context (archaeology); Test (biology); Legal education; Computer science; Legal writing; Point (geometry); Practice of law; Law; Psychology; Mathematics education; Legal profession; Legal research; Political science; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.022026462014504145,"score_gpt":0.34693033789041106,"score_spread":0.3249038758759069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121809023","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039495688,0.008525721,0.4021131,0.27721858,0.02820201,0.0058585885,0.0031841234,0.030402873,0.20499931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06735469,0.0043228827,0.8251363,0.034245465,0.0043201917,0.0020915421,0.0024136791,0.0033077558,0.05680744],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779919,0.0068165297,0.0022854682,0.0021386824,0.008889681,0.001877769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9075082,0.01592784,0.0037512956,0.011228833,0.048818175,0.012765673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036969684,0.0020358176,0.0020802647,0.006020288,0.0041140323,0.010400071,0.0034028017,0.0065437183,0.04482536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11429615,0.0020310325,0.002300977,0.002377729,0.0032516476,0.02354119,0.0075242175,0.012715438,0.043567963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014408157,0.0019495762,0.0077441107,0.0004896779,0.000065023654,0.0006091598,0.0013486578,0.0022040256,0.002779663,0.03669294,0.4563922,0.48958087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038690117,0.0017189581,0.017132256,0.0022056983,0.00017267981,0.0016623155,0.0032605587,0.007027278,0.0075665186,0.051300656,0.90708137,0.00048484883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067996248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007800909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04482536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034110425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076191183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19551665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121921922","doi":"","title":"Against Exclusion: Teaching Transsystemically, Learning in Community","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commonwealth; Rigour; Legal education; Political science; Happening; Law; Sociology; Public administration; History","score_opus":0.017646328445838556,"score_gpt":0.3397817228713135,"score_spread":0.3221353944254749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121921922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33855098,0.0036866479,0.028839717,0.09913015,0.0028077543,0.0012713684,0.000092912225,0.0009234823,0.52469695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.881305,0.003310347,0.018913224,0.011997353,0.00040571947,0.0007035433,0.00015561703,0.00027849837,0.082930684],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99230546,0.004289552,0.00009423762,0.00045980627,0.0011129826,0.001737861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926323,0.0019145834,0.00024875384,0.00031532967,0.0006042347,0.0042848308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076327804,0.0005626254,0.000491207,0.001119285,0.025229158,0.009588382,0.00396221,0.0034382574,0.016090315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008365836,0.00030239913,0.00047671804,0.0011441512,0.020891054,0.0064518214,0.022220086,0.0066639963,0.003109548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057777357,0.0014897103,0.0034167927,0.00034727366,0.000013916734,0.0008900491,0.6282,0.00045217448,0.0014767175,0.08292142,0.071404964,0.20932914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060638857,0.00030870846,0.0037394662,0.00070242956,0.000008645698,0.00046844475,0.44603017,0.00048270397,0.00072529924,0.044882298,0.50254756,0.000043718745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04826375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14275652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04826375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011159578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036557365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09596568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121944165","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001504","title":"The Five Lessons I Learned Through Clinical Education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Indictment; Casebook; Churning; Legal education; Curriculum; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.15597166387903746,"score_gpt":0.5538591762690033,"score_spread":0.3978875123899658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121944165","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061014844,0.024023538,0.013452806,0.75656855,0.011600588,0.0001632985,0.00008741413,0.00026335983,0.18773906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31505525,0.048989993,0.044125404,0.43329284,0.011430489,0.0009907458,0.00019040924,0.00038673676,0.14553817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905346,0.005526412,0.0002704214,0.0008560976,0.0015744034,0.0012380553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873648,0.0043269866,0.00045278174,0.0010720086,0.0020391536,0.0047441274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109138,0.00071390765,0.00050630694,0.0016155073,0.008020215,0.013705962,0.0023313398,0.007518572,0.010942219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02212272,0.0005044809,0.0006352657,0.0009901875,0.025993304,0.013118147,0.011929986,0.021386854,0.004108938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060540024,0.0004647948,0.0021508455,0.0005794243,0.00001726783,0.0008726468,0.035149436,0.0002914369,0.000338248,0.38386288,0.32185373,0.25435883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004949141,0.00017686191,0.00084001594,0.0018990418,0.000007098339,0.0010471854,0.023972841,0.00018557165,0.00033071567,0.2115437,0.7598929,0.00005453409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008059654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011995788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013705962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067218016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018361755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057718396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121983015","doi":"","title":"A FLEX TIME JD: NEW APPROACHES TO THE ACCESSIBILITY OF LEGAL EDUCATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Context (archaeology); Legal profession; Legal research; FLEX; Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Law; Diversity (politics); Legal writing; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.30159413218450865,"score_gpt":0.4334399001458242,"score_spread":0.13184576796131553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121983015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0548836,0.0088216355,0.09809331,0.12249658,0.0017608509,0.00041062574,0.0000983134,0.0006234619,0.7128116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86843634,0.0050957734,0.038319197,0.013964464,0.0004914825,0.00045487663,0.000073954296,0.0002311181,0.072932854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886947,0.0049874913,0.00022964457,0.0010395052,0.0031343477,0.0019144514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854935,0.005397769,0.0005704618,0.0015588457,0.0015917666,0.005387671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009648481,0.00044808103,0.00050104747,0.004166832,0.0125713935,0.013615873,0.003666571,0.0035475753,0.017753802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017823828,0.00042544838,0.00058488705,0.0024833381,0.03479052,0.0122793745,0.021844462,0.007371852,0.0009945527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031251802,0.0001373948,0.0023792286,0.00023774923,0.000007087964,0.00019765124,0.04858189,0.0003461343,0.00033165366,0.7559408,0.015187961,0.17662117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032522184,0.00014625475,0.0073696002,0.0010786885,0.000022532275,0.00043533422,0.06699548,0.0009985839,0.0003921677,0.26631182,0.65614736,0.00006961123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20609562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34318566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9709054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029094603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059607614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40979207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121998444","doi":"","title":"To Lawyer or Not to Lawyer, Is that the question?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAS-Space (University of London)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Economic Justice; Legal service; Political science; Legal profession; Law; Business","score_opus":0.05040420480849176,"score_gpt":0.3709611573844636,"score_spread":0.32055695257597183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121998444","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06087897,0.0067421645,0.0010180597,0.8734085,0.0013747235,0.000015484027,0.00016590049,0.000011129203,0.05638509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8727818,0.0071101943,0.0008699915,0.0999672,0.002201428,0.000029176506,0.00007677629,0.000037068217,0.016926266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932673,0.0031263556,0.00025836658,0.00066014146,0.0011650888,0.0015227598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98133117,0.009109891,0.002803702,0.00042331745,0.0025061232,0.0038257062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007802436,0.000090005065,0.0005510201,0.000775306,0.0030042373,0.0074801026,0.0010305935,0.0052642743,0.01588959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04542269,0.00016628721,0.00030193877,0.0009154301,0.011068334,0.011600096,0.001664463,0.006038351,0.0030421156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017065686,0.0004367657,0.09644687,0.0004469741,0.00013166454,0.0011039802,0.025667716,0.00022923865,0.00042417043,0.3572608,0.2597517,0.25792938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005607725,0.00023745609,0.093491346,0.0021664288,0.00010351009,0.0031882867,0.19861116,0.0006095017,0.00055802375,0.23167965,0.46916503,0.00013343639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011263428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01896661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01588959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032803675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049242415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05315596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122009882","doi":"","title":"Enhancing the Legal Profession’s Capacity for Innovation: The Promise of Reflective Practice and Action Research for Increasing Access to Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Transformative learning; Enabling; Public relations; Legal profession; Action (physics); Action research; Political science; Sociology; Legal practice; Reflective practice; Wicked problem; Engineering ethics; Law; Management; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.2581071089191036,"score_gpt":0.565703784980431,"score_spread":0.30759667606132735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122009882","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026037665,0.026481643,0.14171302,0.67916876,0.0021190022,0.0006111667,0.00004810335,0.0005109955,0.12330972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6817506,0.02664674,0.22472587,0.053312518,0.0019396849,0.0015687215,0.00006514721,0.00027400546,0.009716686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.82416666,0.14895135,0.002598948,0.0057104137,0.013808603,0.004763991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63628596,0.31113833,0.007883084,0.024861816,0.007812914,0.0120178955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14145671,0.0010324415,0.0011884323,0.003951276,0.012611213,0.031416945,0.005397129,0.013999263,0.0055406718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13299672,0.0009548705,0.0016681834,0.0022513447,0.08964041,0.041833248,0.028190173,0.015468875,0.0018687254],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054145818,0.00039026595,0.0019202577,0.0019568861,0.00005692629,0.0004967996,0.103855394,0.0008656233,0.00091238983,0.69864464,0.0131573845,0.17768936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007753581,0.0002002821,0.00082642265,0.004213543,0.000034303364,0.00046224432,0.038478542,0.0016814831,0.0012435745,0.7744803,0.17817172,0.00013006767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034465378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050344723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14145671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012286906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054293256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7481035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122016246","doi":"","title":"The Challenge of Inclusion in the Ethics Classroom","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections Canadian Journal of Music","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.12908029156784992,"score_gpt":0.37137822837466816,"score_spread":0.24229793680681824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122016246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045845672,0.0030248722,0.0062772552,0.6189819,0.0013870453,0.000036406112,0.000019535555,0.00006959154,0.32435775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95960325,0.000997924,0.0017829009,0.014893257,0.0010664763,0.00009559212,0.000011571065,0.00010707811,0.02144196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9581739,0.028509565,0.00048500282,0.001606563,0.006719783,0.004505292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9356983,0.039620943,0.0017706925,0.0024426538,0.0055378196,0.01492966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03527762,0.0004958627,0.0012919577,0.0021686081,0.037079945,0.030731892,0.0034306552,0.014207078,0.014352018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05637817,0.00055130036,0.0005838461,0.0011720926,0.094277225,0.022940937,0.027490253,0.021396287,0.0021335941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020958785,0.000064626096,0.0005625241,0.000050861436,0.0000057579305,0.00016506221,0.058293078,0.00015561431,0.00010447959,0.9113552,0.01400316,0.015218737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002943547,0.00002294869,0.0005259384,0.00025341212,0.000005314449,0.00013706106,0.05695507,0.00039121674,0.00021268858,0.8059811,0.13546339,0.000022342212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02953936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030328115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037079945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017022707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06263517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18656814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122093200","doi":"","title":"Advocacy in Non-Adversarial Family Law: A Recommendation for Revision to the Model Code","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Negotiation; Family law; Political science; Law; Dispute resolution; Code (set theory); Public relations; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.030075939681031,"score_gpt":0.3782278832655172,"score_spread":0.3481519435844862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122093200","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047725225,0.0049050837,0.010063426,0.9458152,0.00833355,0.0007988001,0.00010842912,0.00028212002,0.024920883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.124130934,0.012156789,0.1679716,0.6418011,0.008767574,0.0043010884,0.0005937328,0.00039927155,0.03987787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91182256,0.035702817,0.0102083925,0.0048053055,0.031128405,0.006332547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63792557,0.17172275,0.017124308,0.02974984,0.121474765,0.022002669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10018838,0.0009834503,0.0019986988,0.004233376,0.010011821,0.019800195,0.011994957,0.03674742,0.008065333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22952339,0.00090849015,0.0035615088,0.005094322,0.039550006,0.024830934,0.009492934,0.04413202,0.0036522038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016422573,0.00064431835,0.0049772374,0.001567704,0.00005561057,0.000523434,0.017581869,0.0010033366,0.0005478275,0.5352753,0.31034178,0.1273174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024199285,0.00026302546,0.0064975657,0.008215369,0.00013125216,0.0006174697,0.01804836,0.0019740064,0.00059855887,0.15882759,0.8041916,0.00039324706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24756216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31322944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24756216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030345345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18512471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5298531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122188266","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4419","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR ALL: TOWARDS AN “EXPANSIVE VISION” OF JUSTICE AND TECHNOLOGY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Economic Justice; Deliverable; Software deployment; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.07498148193957802,"score_gpt":0.4503946477101648,"score_spread":0.3754131657705868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122188266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020771397,0.031137833,0.048341915,0.39645907,0.002036773,0.00015433136,0.000109488166,0.00016922719,0.50082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.870535,0.019946339,0.023533674,0.049872234,0.0010312767,0.0002326892,0.00009565287,0.00016823325,0.03458473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769323,0.00805008,0.00058217184,0.0016693689,0.008893669,0.0038723939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98681355,0.0057961335,0.0006380792,0.0010537875,0.0035822284,0.0021162487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017615221,0.0014653312,0.0010456517,0.0068313335,0.02380086,0.03777774,0.0041524936,0.0120161995,0.0035672516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014762199,0.00061169115,0.0008171308,0.0046556117,0.14477582,0.029491853,0.02064151,0.018750826,0.0004052327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003605846,0.0000064879982,0.0001348206,0.000050114024,0.0000029231626,0.00005728853,0.013927626,0.00013600466,0.00007988869,0.9764971,0.003181839,0.005922192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007004229,0.000029474342,0.0011803873,0.0008936347,0.00001831097,0.00020188336,0.041700922,0.0005527934,0.00037283605,0.567416,0.38753974,0.000086899905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61506134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6076134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61506134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088615105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09164573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77441126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122270388","doi":"10.53300/001c.5598","title":"The idea of human rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05102647534024038,"score_gpt":0.42031768459823554,"score_spread":0.3692912092579952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122270388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021137584,0.031003052,0.023653254,0.3047634,0.0063118534,0.000058884016,0.00010397172,0.0000698069,0.631922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45139673,0.025229873,0.01529723,0.16660655,0.014238282,0.0005519396,0.00011345404,0.00022115631,0.32634476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392384,0.0035622062,0.00013469296,0.00084013725,0.0010706934,0.00046828113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958692,0.002657694,0.00024544058,0.0005320589,0.0003810289,0.00031450432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006519308,0.0005464025,0.0005179911,0.0014254384,0.0040901923,0.009085063,0.0013759062,0.0056456313,0.0129321655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071377927,0.00031836206,0.0005676107,0.000853636,0.03963695,0.011723478,0.0035529532,0.013835956,0.0024635647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013933047,0.0000012652101,0.000010460276,0.000008519462,7.117791e-7,0.000004508865,0.00020882301,0.000013690069,0.0000078623925,0.99213505,0.0062732277,0.0013345001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054293873,0.000011253161,0.00006561698,0.00011892107,0.0000021149144,0.00004007029,0.00036843106,0.000069048576,0.000043901582,0.6468391,0.3524307,0.000005387259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004186359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003092065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0129321655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050872625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043496736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043262362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122295073","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.983","title":"IF PHILOSOPHICAL LEGAL ETHICS IS THE ANSWER, WHAT IS THE QUESTION?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Legal ethics; Law; Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Principle of legality; Political science; Sociology; Meta-ethics; Normative ethics; Immorality; Information ethics; Legal profession; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03466443420024338,"score_gpt":0.35657622478657486,"score_spread":0.32191179058633146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122295073","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059876754,0.008401724,0.0032398393,0.97572905,0.002431175,0.000006919775,0.000033304812,0.000025638294,0.009533699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16594507,0.05735896,0.01981752,0.6828704,0.047026828,0.00032408015,0.00025393566,0.00044891375,0.025954278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98455137,0.008715767,0.00047206855,0.001246755,0.0036069034,0.001407148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9451415,0.035007358,0.0032206995,0.0029184606,0.008013313,0.005698728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029900488,0.0009805976,0.0022982452,0.0027476298,0.007827849,0.015475899,0.0033111495,0.021100152,0.019648168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063248344,0.0006821358,0.0013230345,0.0027458838,0.061110985,0.044266623,0.0070731123,0.025510924,0.009051225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021084872,0.000085199965,0.00055917806,0.00032045244,0.000034268414,0.000079845624,0.0014520729,0.0001952007,0.000109447974,0.8941212,0.0871292,0.015892848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014173603,0.000008633427,0.00019419625,0.0004235403,0.000004881706,0.000068845104,0.0030807983,0.00016942008,0.000037922106,0.90551484,0.09046684,0.000015828922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004454047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038078483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029900488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008538783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0141533045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15813082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122356076","doi":"","title":"Administrative Justice and Adjudicative Ethics in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.08548042270226337,"score_gpt":0.392835574526358,"score_spread":0.3073551518240946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122356076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04530001,0.019108506,0.031810317,0.36173782,0.0016575463,0.00029942294,0.00016496031,0.00017690992,0.53974456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9023452,0.0066230115,0.012524864,0.0324855,0.00051743217,0.00017309622,0.00007381545,0.000089323934,0.045167815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93619305,0.024126135,0.0021167002,0.0036395136,0.020946216,0.012978471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520793,0.018694285,0.0027727555,0.0021018598,0.017043877,0.0073079243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025006121,0.00045123944,0.00076226844,0.002679989,0.043081697,0.02004711,0.003088197,0.0077913995,0.0043142126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05566358,0.0006717354,0.00058893004,0.006920751,0.06352632,0.0060790405,0.010405319,0.012466601,0.00046054358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072661023,0.00001051356,0.0007968628,0.000039610542,0.0000057450557,0.00008618164,0.0056240084,0.00034940394,0.000042904794,0.97576636,0.008697835,0.008573373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048927574,0.000036860056,0.009464799,0.0006874774,0.000036233025,0.00018331995,0.018188711,0.0036916046,0.0003737894,0.49139136,0.4757154,0.00018156241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9768022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.976976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80148643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19851358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.417375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9296106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122378279","doi":"10.1177/1037969x0803300301","title":"Teaching ‘Indigenous Peoples and the Law’","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternative Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Law; Sociology; Ecology","score_opus":0.04611415241944052,"score_gpt":0.37243170542012266,"score_spread":0.32631755300068216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122378279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29522198,0.01043958,0.0058310414,0.118853636,0.0014553448,0.00005968888,0.000013955475,0.000091533286,0.5680333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9198243,0.005761726,0.0032517556,0.009584455,0.00038581426,0.000042329724,0.000011284929,0.000020952537,0.061117385],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745005,0.0011795978,0.000055511784,0.00016145186,0.0005592234,0.00059416634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794835,0.0009077808,0.00022486021,0.0001091592,0.00019443501,0.00061547186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002806724,0.0001790341,0.00022188302,0.0006712151,0.009035245,0.004634051,0.0008562367,0.0020187688,0.009301071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052124974,0.00021200076,0.00023775699,0.0005477141,0.016178824,0.004648429,0.0047743316,0.003527412,0.0006450136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011781044,0.00032471106,0.004563213,0.00029219175,0.000010169338,0.0009122176,0.5112351,0.00019650604,0.0012710454,0.3660373,0.019200077,0.09594561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014271918,0.00014298028,0.012630198,0.00063911575,0.000015378559,0.0009990489,0.29163244,0.0002241,0.00082104874,0.11235656,0.5804927,0.00003217862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028094182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07765949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028094182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004392347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009558239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055861294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122420603","doi":"","title":"The Future of Legal Education: Three Visions and a Prediction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Legal profession; Legal education; Variety (cybernetics); Legal practice; Legal realism; Legal research; Law; Empirical legal studies; Function (biology); Practice of law; Political science; Legal service; Legal opinion; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Private law; Black letter law; Computer science","score_opus":0.013455421616466241,"score_gpt":0.3393582222721477,"score_spread":0.32590280065568145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122420603","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030057592,0.023906419,0.014435072,0.7640423,0.0032121348,0.00009251684,0.00021363511,0.00029717805,0.16374314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545999,0.009359956,0.008856661,0.019950183,0.0020786624,0.00020245778,0.00013946259,0.000060198727,0.004752525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920878,0.0030408138,0.00026051945,0.00088394375,0.002504487,0.0012224306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821295,0.007237701,0.0020642146,0.0013835035,0.0035209444,0.003664165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011646637,0.001102713,0.00070366595,0.002951424,0.0054703644,0.014533086,0.002359452,0.007122443,0.004607669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0154551715,0.0005132794,0.0006347755,0.0017952182,0.035367392,0.030040028,0.009554706,0.011202433,0.00074645673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065007174,0.00011094706,0.0021061262,0.0001276966,0.000009736622,0.00008012631,0.0019045484,0.0007547135,0.00008741042,0.9632321,0.013878195,0.017643463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027255706,0.00005393332,0.0019995938,0.0002289373,0.000009139736,0.00012954215,0.0063231993,0.0023680145,0.000107031556,0.9633765,0.025319146,0.000057665784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068311524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006030043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014533086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008164192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009185575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06159407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122478317","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Aspiration and Reality in Legal Education de David Sandomierski (Aspiration and Reality in Legal Education by David Sandomierski)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Humanities; Sociology; Political science; Management; Art; Economics","score_opus":0.017896229108738712,"score_gpt":0.3565283626879016,"score_spread":0.3386321335791629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122478317","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017209793,0.9030296,0.00024340418,0.039658293,0.02042463,0.000028858205,0.00015704837,0.00002277427,0.036263227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033642328,0.83870715,0.00042922262,0.0165238,0.013789751,0.00010100975,0.00030279873,0.00004721251,0.12673488],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986767,0.0002331792,0.0000872596,0.000155727,0.0007655217,0.00008164263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968131,0.001489371,0.00022014025,0.00006881594,0.0012116678,0.00019675911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010146981,0.0012182206,0.0014615997,0.004338747,0.0017662856,0.0044521824,0.0012868574,0.0024365124,0.025310645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059582014,0.00054140674,0.0003905104,0.00862988,0.002653029,0.0051921066,0.0014868936,0.0041692127,0.009541141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046252717,0.0000055016,0.000029071562,0.00043224831,0.0000027286503,0.000020532125,0.00012704442,0.000031099564,0.00002989088,0.0038660413,0.9690412,0.026410012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033306585,0.000004095272,0.00029003492,0.0009591913,0.000003488071,0.00010544525,0.00015081478,0.000012579247,0.000020058704,0.0011998591,0.99724436,0.0000067335072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045215894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07518481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045215894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063671023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00968995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08990544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122478365","doi":"","title":"Examining the Real Demand for Legal Services","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal research; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Legal profession; Legal service; Legal advice; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.06102453544762384,"score_gpt":0.39986169713929065,"score_spread":0.33883716169166683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122478365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866981,0.00013019545,0.00013549757,0.0043257372,0.000007369401,0.000008586092,0.00087744795,0.0000035438277,0.007813467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980812,0.00017219211,0.00012950774,0.00016396766,0.000016242988,0.000010032222,0.00030293548,0.000002541456,0.0011213248],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983754,0.0005638948,0.000111237954,0.00017136353,0.00046273516,0.0003152462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883896,0.0046681934,0.0038032979,0.0002223872,0.0014203615,0.0014961594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010055217,0.000084891144,0.00020471467,0.00140473,0.0008524594,0.0019692613,0.00086151285,0.0009778896,0.011605678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012086468,0.00030369352,0.00018468082,0.002228325,0.0009204223,0.00277151,0.0012712192,0.0015101366,0.00094365375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009230617,0.00034662205,0.9563549,0.00010931959,0.000046633904,0.00044534108,0.005190695,0.0007921491,0.00045174675,0.010949234,0.003748376,0.021472659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001420897,0.00022702957,0.9509783,0.000085330605,0.000016971384,0.0005661422,0.030968333,0.0034792218,0.00031376455,0.0034856948,0.009833823,0.000031212443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016201967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036626477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016201967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025784136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012630827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038824856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122623942","doi":"","title":"FITNESS FOR PURPOSE: MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL ETHICSEDUCATION FOR LAWYERS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Legal profession; Legal ethics; Law; Political science; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.07790721303275834,"score_gpt":0.43330832610291975,"score_spread":0.3554011130701614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122623942","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27502033,0.005744394,0.0051086335,0.4905746,0.0035289817,0.0014464753,0.00027776617,0.0005274123,0.21777143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8987445,0.0011186211,0.007711599,0.05714817,0.00079113,0.0005985358,0.00017268228,0.000040348958,0.033674408],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944899,0.0012485747,0.00024625033,0.000371592,0.0016789691,0.001964749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96805745,0.010460958,0.0024648022,0.0014076502,0.0064259004,0.011183139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007964895,0.00018031095,0.00032599387,0.0009840337,0.0047349758,0.0025017252,0.0016045674,0.0060054855,0.013895334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043605223,0.00024084785,0.00037389525,0.000676505,0.0020384204,0.0024100281,0.0046874187,0.0034280561,0.0012968032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028042457,0.0027317477,0.023966312,0.001483937,0.000033460557,0.0011100118,0.021509802,0.00039389814,0.0036442638,0.08963465,0.30740553,0.547806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069182424,0.00094710663,0.24330945,0.003395446,0.00013242304,0.0017215825,0.018138373,0.0014563979,0.0036742052,0.04544043,0.6809168,0.00017600764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.118470155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4628266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118470155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008958324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.063018054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23556119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122642849","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005555","title":"Testing Theory and Debunking Stereotypes: Lawyers’ Views on the Practice of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Ethical code; Public relations; Professional responsibility; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07706624245631,"score_gpt":0.38284459148184546,"score_spread":0.30577834902553547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122642849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92796874,0.0008790385,0.0052596196,0.026753776,0.00013927057,0.000057308807,0.000015068557,0.00003713653,0.03889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797565,0.00014179196,0.00025994782,0.0009264409,0.000030663698,0.000013333103,0.0000046940913,0.0000114561635,0.0006359922],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90725094,0.074502945,0.001551142,0.0025109362,0.010272305,0.0039116982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8573731,0.11322651,0.01379132,0.0050978106,0.007079165,0.00343216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054556318,0.0005291354,0.00070191047,0.005567364,0.017118284,0.017163906,0.0032521172,0.0060500763,0.002708226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.108804315,0.0008308142,0.00056042464,0.0026149573,0.07363991,0.01493761,0.012354159,0.010609444,0.0002669249],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018512545,0.000023529428,0.0037238465,0.000025462448,0.0000058091814,0.00016623407,0.9792326,0.00003194803,0.00015319357,0.012534384,0.00025044763,0.003834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009942012,0.000041375144,0.001985049,0.00011421746,0.000006618502,0.00014599263,0.98087585,0.0002402473,0.000185354,0.011257793,0.005121125,0.000016446695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014587994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010737873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054556318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010363314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075799776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28852487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122755571","doi":"10.31651/2524-2660-2020-4-24-30","title":"CONTENT COMPONENT OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OF BACHELORS IN LAW AT CANADIAN UNIVERSITIES","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vìsnik Čerkasʹkogo unìversitetu. Serìâ Pedagogìčnì naukii/Vìsnik Čerkasʹkogo unìversitetu. Serìâ Pedagogìčnì nauki","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Context (archaeology); Professional development; Pedagogy; Political science; Law; Sociology; Medical education; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.20497218458610533,"score_gpt":0.36618725355534976,"score_spread":0.16121506896924442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122755571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8161151,0.0012362004,0.0019462915,0.0021410952,0.000086950735,0.0010409653,0.004774223,0.00022110168,0.172438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97801983,0.0010488272,0.0020821006,0.00022130518,0.000020922489,0.00020555388,0.0013619732,0.000022898814,0.01701664],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566144,0.00045325575,0.00016614851,0.00031147798,0.0024801914,0.0009274819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98585516,0.0017813926,0.00086362765,0.00036436794,0.0078310445,0.0033043206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025217829,0.00022430127,0.00022338697,0.0034868123,0.0025405006,0.0020894185,0.0007708332,0.00027420072,0.010454336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015463829,0.00015837082,0.00022694663,0.003407025,0.0014158782,0.0005523949,0.0009930037,0.00041355335,0.00065466133],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002465446,0.00043670097,0.33483592,0.0021478692,0.000027009759,0.00021118428,0.057269435,0.0007211937,0.006698752,0.014361578,0.034074552,0.5489693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008153318,0.00008433961,0.9299922,0.0004893762,0.000021797343,0.000081404396,0.020406319,0.00035055383,0.0017789948,0.0006470568,0.04611934,0.000020372556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67621887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7874508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033078503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08516628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6513759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122804512","doi":"","title":"Revising Canada's Ethical Rules for Judges Returningto Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal ethics; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07271359044952126,"score_gpt":0.3724877803201102,"score_spread":0.29977418987058896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122804512","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053301256,0.0027052506,0.010426344,0.625692,0.0050191856,0.0011284811,0.00059561053,0.00035925186,0.3007726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52678275,0.0018522124,0.023067936,0.32528198,0.0016213557,0.0009189018,0.00028641673,0.0004867761,0.11970166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8482053,0.029408852,0.010309203,0.011115144,0.057122346,0.04383926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72384727,0.13776453,0.00638212,0.01055346,0.09376761,0.027685015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10114315,0.0011669169,0.0023226575,0.006343073,0.05199181,0.03710781,0.012824896,0.06548964,0.009589678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2493584,0.0031502724,0.0024848755,0.00467077,0.028234381,0.007524053,0.00913657,0.058182698,0.0016421896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010347872,0.00013467562,0.007108721,0.00018239606,0.000084359315,0.00063793606,0.0186217,0.0013547087,0.0006076391,0.61934996,0.3303944,0.02142012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041791942,0.00016000296,0.02357244,0.003344821,0.0004370145,0.00051808957,0.035894156,0.0041629747,0.002594379,0.16680807,0.76114607,0.00094417325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9558825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12417116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12417116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.49576187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90092903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122891070","doi":"","title":"A Community of Procedure Scholars: Teaching Procedure and the Legal Academy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Queen's University","funders":"European Commission; University of Oxford","keywords":"Scholarship; Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Academic community; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law; Media studies; Library science; Social science; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.041240817251016804,"score_gpt":0.3399253154453063,"score_spread":0.2986844981942895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122891070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7565072,0.0045933793,0.006829573,0.10151123,0.00042580135,0.000070863614,0.000031884007,0.00009983294,0.12993012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932273,0.0007416236,0.0010760018,0.0018034029,0.000194142,0.000025438023,0.000012188338,0.00002954044,0.0028903233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97130775,0.018790739,0.0005562343,0.0018235715,0.0049238796,0.0025977297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92965686,0.030019991,0.009572509,0.0040328545,0.0041816486,0.02253615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031164052,0.00021995988,0.0005186146,0.0075019845,0.02088639,0.019407507,0.002316208,0.0033710133,0.008010463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062059183,0.0003267817,0.00035601002,0.0051454343,0.046270393,0.017403318,0.02037613,0.004302694,0.00075159594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061480605,0.00041702815,0.03477898,0.00011515779,0.00002931972,0.00032820736,0.35830635,0.00027198187,0.00083823234,0.49985483,0.0057867193,0.099211685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091129456,0.00029613418,0.035523452,0.00073803565,0.000030888303,0.0004448639,0.53591365,0.0009811589,0.0006793957,0.23963475,0.18559086,0.000075716816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004012698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008307654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031164052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0083807465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02029532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16481322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122934028","doi":"10.29173/alr335","title":"Cowboy Jurists and the Making of Legal Professionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Novelty; Politics; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Legal profession; Legal ethics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.08002456854676912,"score_gpt":0.425590449034681,"score_spread":0.3455658804879119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122934028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08643576,0.058184482,0.004600823,0.15681522,0.000717559,0.00004691843,0.00002649011,0.000047532016,0.6931253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939903,0.011613326,0.0010363917,0.0072410894,0.0003765566,0.000019762329,0.000011713772,0.00002021605,0.03977793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99038565,0.003941642,0.00017453432,0.00058737915,0.003382889,0.0015279857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930607,0.0037862773,0.0005612481,0.00030693144,0.0016287512,0.00065615104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006590911,0.00014606396,0.00024824217,0.0031963622,0.009380942,0.008186678,0.000968361,0.003230878,0.002930157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011346657,0.00028314625,0.00018662358,0.00168806,0.041562594,0.0025280938,0.003235045,0.0040488425,0.00026975755],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004353977,0.000006544971,0.0003562877,0.00003346488,0.0000022282818,0.00007649143,0.005604899,0.00012958022,0.00006749263,0.97921604,0.004159118,0.010343508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028882892,0.000025524336,0.0061604585,0.00041359538,0.000011710457,0.00016607442,0.008742093,0.00041448403,0.00029290776,0.3902191,0.5935051,0.000020015297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27340326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3309392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7265967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039168425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0430017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54362375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122939006","doi":"","title":"Are We Ethically Bound to Use Student Engagement Technologies for Teaching Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Clicker; Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Student engagement; Competence (human resources); Legal education; Active learning (machine learning); Law; Political science; Mathematics education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1335115211788556,"score_gpt":0.45513596597553774,"score_spread":0.3216244447966822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122939006","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10414722,0.005496146,0.0450667,0.7476699,0.0018832955,0.00013558111,0.000040554147,0.00025346366,0.095307164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88515174,0.0043257843,0.012454059,0.07899486,0.0009226306,0.00039387032,0.000048075544,0.00020202858,0.017506825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9185979,0.062001288,0.0016671247,0.003460271,0.010597904,0.0036755735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8973013,0.06541688,0.009942407,0.008799836,0.008392811,0.010146733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039084006,0.00041637738,0.00060939434,0.0010256628,0.0052138795,0.022659667,0.0019199902,0.009091135,0.0046081436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10581971,0.0004530071,0.0004339617,0.00086138357,0.028084027,0.020639686,0.010488527,0.012290704,0.0034519597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102856466,0.0007748225,0.026416931,0.00068020326,0.00007943578,0.0005348481,0.17164156,0.00068255037,0.0028398107,0.4358201,0.048208736,0.31221807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078133955,0.00052175444,0.0063643404,0.0024601023,0.00004509983,0.0008506958,0.15253587,0.0018841097,0.0046246005,0.3961833,0.4343062,0.00014572844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071279577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009049256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039084006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002776711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068735816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20669842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122948347","doi":"","title":"Cold, Hard Justice Lessons from the Fleet: Innovating from the Bottom Up","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Incubator; Popularity; Economic Justice; Legal service; Mentorship; Legal practice; Legal research; Service (business); Political science; Legal profession; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Law; Management; Legal realism; Business; Marketing; Economics","score_opus":0.07162878847712874,"score_gpt":0.3999315251994584,"score_spread":0.3283027367223297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122948347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23439142,0.008089439,0.022302402,0.2662005,0.0027445203,0.00038547534,0.00014781416,0.0004468785,0.46529147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75683993,0.0066248043,0.022088125,0.026001116,0.0003132804,0.00014711359,0.00012230482,0.0004694821,0.18739387],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636465,0.0017172205,0.00006627717,0.00029886956,0.0006699493,0.0008831009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935828,0.0017057279,0.0002932145,0.00032167463,0.0010842044,0.0030123226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060351836,0.00037071813,0.00023150026,0.00066599046,0.014488334,0.01019346,0.0017970968,0.0024268632,0.015382188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008480499,0.00028477926,0.00031562912,0.0005550753,0.0121662095,0.008943207,0.0072691333,0.0040853857,0.0029552926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056702553,0.00029916145,0.008276882,0.0005649919,0.000018180766,0.0029354796,0.50345325,0.0005865547,0.0024574634,0.1264961,0.15160711,0.20324807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009562021,0.000116159456,0.0031404805,0.0006510371,0.000011067034,0.000307178,0.27961823,0.00029124718,0.00063813775,0.013973507,0.7012087,0.000034655513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09170957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33716312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09170957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012312534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03300669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18235147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123116383","doi":"","title":"The Law Practice Program: Tackling Racial Inequality in the Legal Profession?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Legal profession; Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Practice of law; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Social science","score_opus":0.13688249971330668,"score_gpt":0.4915060772265879,"score_spread":0.3546235775132812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123116383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40903303,0.008013618,0.006197939,0.37105778,0.0020643428,0.00043433334,0.00015021379,0.00012988309,0.20291893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9159181,0.0033922207,0.0049265265,0.038394697,0.00045754467,0.00027528044,0.000092768,0.00004836593,0.036494546],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99322426,0.0022505412,0.000086110056,0.00038455235,0.001558454,0.0024962449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99193585,0.0013060478,0.00058374123,0.00024266333,0.00093652925,0.004995173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005466565,0.00020685022,0.0003459545,0.0012303963,0.014991691,0.0053072264,0.002090764,0.0026713246,0.007840198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011810688,0.00019151712,0.00025440418,0.0013023242,0.005898347,0.0033374478,0.006544682,0.0038155974,0.00068702403],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011176458,0.0008502743,0.06734047,0.0006769771,0.000028944205,0.0014031385,0.09090534,0.00031220776,0.0021221463,0.21393326,0.102171086,0.5201444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097634984,0.00051211595,0.14455046,0.001576589,0.000048134378,0.0007651386,0.14170161,0.0007639432,0.0007815332,0.018027315,0.6910996,0.00007602834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41639584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.795931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58360416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017102366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09144887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8279443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123120961","doi":"","title":"Trends in Global and Canadian Lawyer Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020295568163073593,"score_gpt":0.33222740640283904,"score_spread":0.31193183823976545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123120961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10591722,0.02977438,0.0012075757,0.36362544,0.0019027857,0.00013001729,0.0030135328,0.00040919386,0.49401984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7436622,0.030572543,0.0033986068,0.07227439,0.00060177833,0.00009560017,0.0021627997,0.00022058851,0.14701155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98735297,0.000632345,0.00025888055,0.0013449374,0.0057978444,0.004613038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798061,0.0013096113,0.0011953681,0.00032638124,0.008887081,0.0084754955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004800709,0.00049350644,0.00045275502,0.006034423,0.012611456,0.010239402,0.00240548,0.0036884819,0.038084377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010591036,0.000399575,0.00061854714,0.011347198,0.008031489,0.0043402673,0.0049504023,0.0056374595,0.001649403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009974001,0.00018726964,0.04153436,0.0009859931,0.00007055259,0.0005791216,0.028410971,0.0005435997,0.0008121975,0.33951023,0.32944083,0.2578251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018663317,0.0000330716,0.087925166,0.0005271581,0.00002571358,0.00019800842,0.016498854,0.00023459856,0.00029040087,0.004027244,0.8901361,0.00008498071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98194385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19356366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19356366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25076798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93535185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123174293","doi":"","title":"The Ethical Obligations of Defence Counsel in Sexual Assault Cases","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Law; Value (mathematics); Legal ethics; Position (finance); Closing (real estate); Stereotype (UML); Political science; Cross-examination; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.04049530807725021,"score_gpt":0.3626806926764827,"score_spread":0.32218538459923246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123174293","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.237158,0.009430643,0.010369949,0.6007496,0.0009515863,0.00013107918,0.000023240209,0.00006346002,0.14112242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95355195,0.0019246676,0.0036753549,0.033025526,0.00037699426,0.000093861694,0.000007107247,0.000015184495,0.0073293946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9333614,0.051191606,0.0021463193,0.0014939328,0.0071145743,0.004692219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9237678,0.057424046,0.0041206833,0.0028352765,0.004630716,0.0072215027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040250722,0.00027718244,0.00041969394,0.0014009418,0.014722872,0.009332258,0.0017639878,0.020250628,0.0022395432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1048336,0.0005694648,0.00030403998,0.00078726077,0.03086546,0.0038815662,0.010061973,0.0122533655,0.00068139774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082185165,0.00018195255,0.009898039,0.00015124817,0.000028749566,0.005933236,0.2001991,0.0006436982,0.0016090897,0.70124626,0.02287096,0.057155512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009316069,0.00013872207,0.0050496063,0.0015634494,0.000030108751,0.008550606,0.1664414,0.0015008699,0.0016316846,0.5868768,0.22797757,0.00014609637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057037165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010242708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040250722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056713945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022047723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21286869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123194011","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics Versus Political Practices: The Application of the Rules of Professional Conduct to Lawyer-Politicians","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Surrender; Law; Political science; Professional responsibility; Politics; Legal profession; Balance (ability); Adversarial system; Professional ethics; Practice of law; Psychology","score_opus":0.09999434603611196,"score_gpt":0.4310620774981539,"score_spread":0.33106773146204194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123194011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026914181,0.0064468654,0.013293225,0.441895,0.00091112533,0.00007509257,0.000041409116,0.000044479,0.5103786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409376,0.0034640797,0.0038269102,0.032992013,0.0005260354,0.000074688694,0.000021356795,0.000051669274,0.018105704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9513897,0.021949902,0.0012300775,0.0029543166,0.015314987,0.007160962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97332317,0.014809301,0.0025192697,0.0016350778,0.005399389,0.0023138784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022048006,0.00041443086,0.0005890864,0.0025820597,0.020453274,0.014555564,0.0025324286,0.0091956835,0.0021791323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04446459,0.00048558123,0.00042504907,0.0026634904,0.1027392,0.0065492787,0.0043798573,0.0092107495,0.00042211378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029997063,0.0000060215416,0.00038439457,0.000022368837,0.0000019454064,0.00004372344,0.010079508,0.00007949364,0.000045697703,0.98233205,0.0033974813,0.0036042975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030664738,0.000025579695,0.006179847,0.0007638657,0.00002320814,0.00015751943,0.031006299,0.00082662125,0.00047219318,0.639674,0.32075787,0.00008238883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6592389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74771816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6592389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057165388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10489833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68553585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123196425","doi":"","title":"Law and Learning 'from the Field': The Pedagogical Relevance of Collaborative Teacher-Student Empirical Legal Research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Perspective (graphical); Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Empirical research; Legal research; Legal education; Empirical legal studies; Position (finance); Perception; Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.20029242665383198,"score_gpt":0.43050874698198777,"score_spread":0.23021632032815578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123196425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5902108,0.009806474,0.06537107,0.107390255,0.001285851,0.000508244,0.000058875125,0.00022866178,0.22513984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812315,0.001899798,0.0070954664,0.0017050593,0.00018723245,0.00027485218,0.000018919996,0.000055845354,0.0075313044],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91902745,0.073587984,0.0007390168,0.0021784971,0.0030797771,0.0013872631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83532387,0.14515707,0.003309267,0.007883271,0.003626867,0.004699709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047190547,0.00037994064,0.0009318388,0.0028144282,0.0125122275,0.0166075,0.0027460884,0.0041205916,0.008838704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10174022,0.0005341063,0.00046259785,0.0020130302,0.03052001,0.01605385,0.016374791,0.005828521,0.0010011351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033855977,0.00033887007,0.0038500344,0.00039590502,0.000016364078,0.00051938696,0.8199242,0.00024988974,0.00043679035,0.11813695,0.0032145055,0.052883316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007226957,0.00020006325,0.0038887777,0.0011527403,0.00002296734,0.0007096715,0.7877236,0.0008271746,0.00072145386,0.08872699,0.115909226,0.000045083765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024397795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007018645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047190547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006078974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01149192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24957043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123271246","doi":"10.5235/le.15.2.243","title":"Regulation in Practice: The ‘Ethical Economy’ of Lawyer Regulation in Canada and a Case Study in Lawyer Deviance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Deviance (statistics); Legal ethics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.08432628590548419,"score_gpt":0.4334728592694356,"score_spread":0.3491465733639514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123271246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68418777,0.0037998161,0.002940845,0.09219628,0.0002037867,0.00032729353,0.00011804376,0.000033755463,0.21619244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808483,0.0012394962,0.0011278533,0.004286774,0.000030681098,0.00006434154,0.000026911068,0.000020198713,0.012355491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98203295,0.005036238,0.00024137656,0.000881689,0.0055993376,0.0062084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872909,0.0050501195,0.0010508959,0.0003981972,0.0033118387,0.0028980875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076484433,0.00044230281,0.0005969154,0.0028969077,0.054506335,0.011061196,0.0029799389,0.009632233,0.0034033873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01849538,0.00054737594,0.0007157053,0.00570765,0.031500224,0.003452431,0.0061488147,0.009590686,0.00020015807],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106249616,0.0005604421,0.043565955,0.00021474478,0.0000541904,0.00850329,0.27631965,0.0020252005,0.00083813793,0.61697286,0.021122014,0.02971725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021848845,0.00018843185,0.1021072,0.0008827757,0.00011759492,0.0020243488,0.53899616,0.007394863,0.0010646328,0.052988637,0.293702,0.00031488345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99477094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7903286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20967138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23973416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9166692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123285973","doi":"","title":"Regulatory Reform in Ontario: Machine Learning and Regulation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Big data; Analytics; Government (linguistics); Computer science; Business; Artificial intelligence; Data science; Data mining","score_opus":0.041144070679876375,"score_gpt":0.3422707816455392,"score_spread":0.30112671096566285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123285973","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041737915,0.009473455,0.0011449562,0.89633834,0.0026530118,0.000044897908,0.00029006205,0.000057486566,0.085823976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23134233,0.023804897,0.0035591559,0.5485134,0.0049628727,0.00024992757,0.00051121117,0.00019479476,0.18686137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771085,0.0036646174,0.0006573023,0.0013693937,0.011499888,0.0057004117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97716206,0.008121623,0.00097628764,0.0009570258,0.01037653,0.0024065268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010590096,0.0006665965,0.00085104484,0.001549787,0.026431853,0.012164398,0.003257245,0.017402837,0.008758775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029216664,0.0006814123,0.0015422616,0.0032227766,0.024050608,0.005071808,0.003631227,0.013489212,0.0011093629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000411187,0.000034669432,0.0035376563,0.00017539655,0.000026617718,0.00039288047,0.004328735,0.00063188834,0.00018151177,0.45657244,0.51458764,0.019489462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073328316,0.000018822053,0.010961022,0.00042886334,0.000034990706,0.00006999073,0.002828133,0.001151952,0.00019897017,0.04681126,0.93729085,0.00013189799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9875733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99273187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20563765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20563765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2878525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92134774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123290857","doi":"","title":"Securing Accountability through Commissions of Inquiry: A Role for the Law Commission of Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Accountability; Law; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.08394092837190328,"score_gpt":0.39724349330661224,"score_spread":0.313302564934709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123290857","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046949495,0.0076010847,0.0042926045,0.8553061,0.0022870551,0.00019980005,0.00009880421,0.00016711043,0.08309789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.849667,0.0057870015,0.0064864703,0.08835383,0.00078037544,0.00016249607,0.0000723754,0.00018772285,0.048502654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.954967,0.012518409,0.0010157201,0.0027006168,0.011303849,0.017494433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79904443,0.059701905,0.007865332,0.0041031884,0.057858214,0.07142688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04242335,0.00050656305,0.00087825867,0.0029810583,0.04313077,0.033626597,0.0037870707,0.020365011,0.00921572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15273507,0.0010352249,0.000646495,0.0033934615,0.021165593,0.01317681,0.010472668,0.019138344,0.0006084174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016612858,0.00015979783,0.021016927,0.00030909892,0.00007890569,0.00076884736,0.042468365,0.0013610395,0.0004990595,0.5205252,0.3018859,0.11076078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021270273,0.00012843423,0.028090725,0.0014062149,0.00018382604,0.00021642265,0.059118472,0.0040855184,0.0009093789,0.08920019,0.81599486,0.00045330398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9771449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98616993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13618635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13618635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.61979705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9881057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123293857","doi":"","title":"Teaching 'Public Interest Vocationalism': Law as a Case Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy; History","score_opus":0.2809373681209298,"score_gpt":0.4918458174226807,"score_spread":0.2109084493017509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123293857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59239286,0.0026869355,0.012914144,0.09143904,0.0009087662,0.0007504889,0.000108643304,0.00013794616,0.29866117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547877,0.0015737702,0.0056010354,0.0053848685,0.00015819033,0.00039059692,0.000029782583,0.000042179276,0.032031894],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98061794,0.013924063,0.00022556647,0.0006568088,0.0019605597,0.0026150541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98529994,0.009889297,0.0007414883,0.000484412,0.0007080742,0.0028768547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011245076,0.00052733516,0.00068283733,0.0019705289,0.03783441,0.011443972,0.0035337415,0.0130493175,0.004829887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016248152,0.0005582875,0.0005979876,0.0033390312,0.024453368,0.0058331075,0.0075242883,0.0100688385,0.00076143356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044285818,0.0012463705,0.0040415484,0.00021706782,0.000009332432,0.01689037,0.5282859,0.00069064414,0.00063267857,0.4044619,0.020551976,0.022927877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006791806,0.00027709446,0.0033702701,0.0004610133,0.000015454158,0.0056136088,0.73355544,0.0016166175,0.0010665988,0.02361463,0.23027702,0.000064337815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064289756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.182966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064289756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02030588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016145457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14733016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123295599","doi":"","title":"Educating Lawyers, Cultivating Citizens, and Re-Enchanting the Legal Professional","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Citizenship; Legal profession; Meaning (existential); Incentive; Rubric; Sociology; Law; Public value; Political science; Legal education; Public service; Practice of law; Public relations; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.017421444831573745,"score_gpt":0.34440079464420836,"score_spread":0.3269793498126346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123295599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06774439,0.008392435,0.026180532,0.36896476,0.0012348861,0.00006422174,0.000039286875,0.00026835676,0.52711123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83416617,0.005734807,0.011935358,0.040860225,0.00070945505,0.00007817752,0.000043502594,0.000099344805,0.10637295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956474,0.0024077343,0.00009413733,0.00045833958,0.0009305377,0.0004619181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964765,0.00152043,0.00037421248,0.0003662646,0.00046255568,0.0008000786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046323976,0.00017410236,0.00023176064,0.00068558287,0.005760072,0.01086483,0.00058318174,0.0045897095,0.004644246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054089134,0.00018856178,0.00018371976,0.0006271785,0.019601578,0.007411042,0.0046594157,0.0061245426,0.0017049912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060121356,0.000062351784,0.0011848194,0.00004511971,0.0000018258694,0.0000620525,0.009272853,0.00011214932,0.00027053192,0.92577535,0.018395945,0.04481095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011079002,0.00007095767,0.0021595466,0.00023901381,0.000006842351,0.00014633917,0.0097651705,0.00035852383,0.00089365686,0.47179168,0.51453537,0.00002180282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00675181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01201744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01086483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005865939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012283048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042560637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123361226","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4469.2006.00025.x","title":"Coffee House: Habitus and Performance Among Law Students","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habitus; Personal unconscious; Sociology; Socialization; Ethnography; Identity (music); Social space; Nothing; Critical ethnography; Cultural capital; Determinism; Law; Unconscious mind; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Social science; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Anthropology; Political science","score_opus":0.04892080162436666,"score_gpt":0.3831022137003443,"score_spread":0.3341814120759776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123361226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99636865,0.000065168686,0.00006268784,0.00023858639,0.0000086545315,0.000010171063,0.000017026325,0.000007841029,0.0032212283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988104,0.00004388221,0.000034732293,0.000044944787,0.0000058412215,0.0000062581453,0.000010804755,0.0000042448714,0.0010390138],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812657,0.0008496094,0.00007310713,0.0001870634,0.00030843896,0.0004552641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955546,0.00097381446,0.0008219766,0.0002119109,0.00041259546,0.0020250718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016140053,0.00032188641,0.0005027738,0.0021259421,0.006262465,0.0058765956,0.0008854741,0.0012262769,0.0045545935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007130751,0.0003919024,0.00022927312,0.0013331851,0.0044525564,0.0022107395,0.004241583,0.0013064961,0.0005433099],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018278405,0.0006946356,0.30879346,0.00004552463,0.000030176705,0.0011061183,0.6589031,0.00007408514,0.0015953607,0.0025760967,0.0022446318,0.02375408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063027073,0.00027478943,0.21038307,0.000032681914,0.000010402246,0.0004402719,0.7785186,0.00021234964,0.00040840026,0.00071291684,0.0089404285,0.00005976228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016762393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027751936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016762393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015079244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086317677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033329666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123366788","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Secondary Sources","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.045478895536077764,"score_gpt":0.3320937585656241,"score_spread":0.28661486302954636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123366788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005435589,0.0016779063,0.00050100876,0.007754906,0.00068828894,0.00035758447,0.041256733,0.0013733848,0.9458467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015313022,0.0012774343,0.00060866575,0.0010086034,0.000073440075,0.000110468995,0.007592405,0.00033125232,0.9874663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654526,0.0001657071,0.00017701223,0.00018430864,0.0022997488,0.00062790705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798869,0.0012230847,0.0002927905,0.00055860274,0.016293714,0.0017449122],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027831858,0.0015357769,0.0011358287,0.0103834625,0.009603573,0.0120795695,0.0031343186,0.0057002422,0.60013247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015268575,0.0012656015,0.0008599127,0.016724523,0.0021697783,0.004110503,0.0030299702,0.0026996443,0.2597699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064958017,0.000011143587,0.000088637884,0.000100700476,9.263082e-7,0.000012355888,0.00005925224,0.000046251433,0.000024910976,0.004485379,0.97861654,0.016547432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005339044,0.0000025946083,0.0010048202,0.00016677465,0.00000234372,0.000008495167,0.00014471335,0.000065018496,0.000055811553,0.0008280973,0.99770325,0.0000128155925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9555831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9800632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60013247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056735586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19852424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57036245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123383909","doi":"10.4000/ejpap.543","title":"The Social Dimension of Legal Uncertainty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Dimension (graph theory); Inference; Formative assessment; Syllogism; Philosophy of science; Mill; Element (criminal law); Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.019039231759188008,"score_gpt":0.3139434525350125,"score_spread":0.29490422077582445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123383909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19112691,0.0094515085,0.04013395,0.15417786,0.0006399819,0.000058360696,0.00018009615,0.00007607845,0.6041552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483067,0.00089382625,0.001253137,0.0011410302,0.00029023548,0.000032261953,0.000013727396,0.000010160798,0.0015350712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98691875,0.007339173,0.00047890336,0.0010188248,0.0033116038,0.00093266944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98870146,0.00737107,0.00126849,0.00085156993,0.0012107268,0.000596733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008654248,0.0003648562,0.0004552959,0.003384195,0.009300641,0.0107394215,0.0009448734,0.0031990283,0.0023670753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014547072,0.00030479804,0.0005204602,0.0019291983,0.06113296,0.008640615,0.0089436965,0.003945309,0.00021290946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005044566,0.0000062655267,0.00037555752,0.0000129112195,0.000006429175,0.000040734245,0.0047739134,0.0002962681,0.000038915066,0.9910812,0.0005847718,0.002777963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051340035,0.0000057466536,0.00039036607,0.000039060218,0.000004699765,0.00003107948,0.0028357774,0.00040689533,0.000047804344,0.9820395,0.014185616,0.0000084161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052634235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040450105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0107394215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01015953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005673514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073712945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123404226","doi":"","title":"Learning the 'How' of the Law: Teaching Procedure and Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Underpinning; Vocational education; Subject (documents); Curriculum; Legal education; Civil procedure; Law; Economic Justice; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Common law; Commercial law; Sociology; Mathematics education; Engineering; Computer science; Civil engineering; Mathematics; Library science","score_opus":0.01588365844373171,"score_gpt":0.31845635201931716,"score_spread":0.30257269357558547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123404226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41576943,0.00768216,0.053696714,0.06328193,0.0005286146,0.00014764298,0.000025848703,0.00016570684,0.458702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685374,0.0029079928,0.007569747,0.0026777147,0.0000657279,0.000041587118,0.00001849847,0.000032957374,0.018148335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681026,0.0017834958,0.000048603164,0.00016546134,0.00056432275,0.0006278789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617517,0.0022918647,0.00030829074,0.0001486227,0.00020806708,0.0008679749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035140703,0.0002060365,0.00017309381,0.0007666123,0.0072382437,0.005236392,0.0009432498,0.0016617189,0.003886263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069193454,0.0001648748,0.00019040878,0.00058739824,0.02119679,0.0034786356,0.0046900935,0.0030723303,0.0005372434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024574872,0.0003614104,0.0066263448,0.00024621992,0.000005392199,0.0005382815,0.18841098,0.0009102933,0.0015771071,0.5064955,0.012331548,0.2824724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025137635,0.0002485289,0.01930942,0.0010745673,0.000010610945,0.0009535691,0.21592964,0.0013757484,0.0023999864,0.15787677,0.6007453,0.00005062266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05581541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14799212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05581541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011172209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020479074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11098105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123472421","doi":"","title":"Counting Outsiders: A Critical Exploration of Outsider Course Enrollment in Canadian Legal Education","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Identity (music); Power (physics); Higher education; Law; Critical theory; Qualitative property; Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.04128973832595409,"score_gpt":0.38645698808643375,"score_spread":0.34516724976047963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123472421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92971516,0.0007810882,0.0023688849,0.017145786,0.00018445805,0.0002316625,0.00027340988,0.0000722145,0.049227297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920175,0.00042934038,0.00084544794,0.0014071985,0.000042717184,0.000095193885,0.00007423315,0.000040201863,0.0050481907],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776318,0.0070119034,0.0006036228,0.0020426614,0.007875474,0.0048345765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545025,0.02679098,0.002971959,0.0012447746,0.010754462,0.0037352873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02172737,0.0007171527,0.00077223574,0.013789604,0.042613525,0.014057156,0.005443226,0.0023069803,0.0031291142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057415295,0.00072677876,0.00042499238,0.014293982,0.022232346,0.006350107,0.012162228,0.0048141847,0.00013339178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000097621405,0.000020168416,0.009829222,0.00004070279,0.000002946676,0.00023616117,0.967224,0.000027511642,0.00026977397,0.007630602,0.0020295249,0.012679644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014649673,0.000014762481,0.02107495,0.00010939209,0.000005316759,0.0000730854,0.9550125,0.00017484106,0.0002077303,0.0008249107,0.022466974,0.000034160126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9031963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95344764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109398626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.109398626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09255839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7937463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123497081","doi":"10.29173/alr43","title":"Taking the Instruction of Law Outside the Lecture Hall: How the Flipped Classroom Can Make Learning More Productive and Enjoyable (for Professors and Students)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Flipped classroom; Class (philosophy); Mathematics education; Lecture hall; Legal education; Sociology; Legal writing; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Political science; Legal research; Physics","score_opus":0.0467011691710548,"score_gpt":0.37898964967662696,"score_spread":0.33228848050557214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123497081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4068579,0.032137793,0.074317314,0.0707176,0.003413523,0.00044006482,0.000084855055,0.00083999184,0.411191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9198739,0.010989526,0.025510387,0.0048431335,0.0002883118,0.00015372699,0.000050531646,0.00009238906,0.038198113],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841714,0.0009653885,0.000022758628,0.00013105733,0.00026060207,0.00020304634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779046,0.0014635465,0.00014663364,0.00013234858,0.0002108862,0.0002560521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018883258,0.00022196406,0.0001574199,0.0004830797,0.0019483985,0.0038947153,0.00094968843,0.0012790121,0.0067195417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049092104,0.00013078663,0.0002458711,0.00029059438,0.0042399643,0.0034227334,0.0020736607,0.001512671,0.00092407037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010204457,0.0009665241,0.0030327404,0.0007796945,0.000021039297,0.0007196311,0.030656312,0.00083570235,0.005302994,0.118715666,0.03963041,0.79923725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022620056,0.0013700988,0.017963083,0.0020492591,0.00009242273,0.0014945399,0.05311385,0.0024518296,0.010709835,0.08100427,0.82937574,0.00014886506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076082814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020576147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076082814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023380616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033645076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022479057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123520913","doi":"10.29173/alr41","title":"Experience the Future of Legal Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Legal education; Experiential education; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Legal profession; Argument (complex analysis); Pedagogy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Law; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.02107261499217159,"score_gpt":0.3867919064310887,"score_spread":0.36571929143891707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123520913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08068671,0.061151627,0.0054455698,0.19031946,0.0010331491,0.0000706076,0.000047690915,0.000084565334,0.66116065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91902065,0.022906668,0.0017857787,0.01154946,0.00027104825,0.00003141482,0.000037127887,0.000015322003,0.04438257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99470055,0.002371775,0.0000722294,0.0002733049,0.0014139195,0.0011682756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956435,0.0015228847,0.00025455427,0.000226593,0.0009852019,0.0013671791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00451602,0.00016843082,0.00015767498,0.00097649265,0.0050025834,0.0070098867,0.0012173558,0.0021607154,0.00796537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00505034,0.00011756105,0.00018013566,0.0011203095,0.020571457,0.0041283574,0.004855493,0.002825328,0.00034529564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011468144,0.00006677406,0.0013089447,0.00023534753,0.000005011528,0.00020016609,0.036079343,0.00020333202,0.00027271124,0.8267924,0.016557276,0.11826726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012056932,0.000048215403,0.005415212,0.0008767382,0.0000055933488,0.00023488824,0.047825962,0.00012142697,0.00015868146,0.066112176,0.87916774,0.000021398842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.323114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3866111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.323114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026070613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05670038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64246655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123524901","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3127041","title":"Reducing the 'Justice Gap' Through Access to Legal Information: Establishing Access to Justice Entry Points at Public Libraries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Public access; Internet privacy; Access to information; Business; Political science; Information access; Criminology; Law and economics; Law; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07484656983269776,"score_gpt":0.3903852212193323,"score_spread":0.3155386513866345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123524901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84428287,0.00038268632,0.014757504,0.023173258,0.00016514733,0.0015193617,0.00025211993,0.00059524487,0.11487183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761504,0.00017648593,0.008015672,0.0021414962,0.00009305949,0.0005383767,0.00010288239,0.000082446924,0.012699107],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97749776,0.009658308,0.0008639456,0.0018937641,0.0032671855,0.006819053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91917664,0.03212761,0.0068503693,0.0067341123,0.013171462,0.021939818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012802922,0.00042845242,0.00073838356,0.0033196167,0.016612696,0.021199746,0.0055439672,0.006263975,0.04194157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06698899,0.0011821515,0.00061447424,0.003571388,0.0063819764,0.022566952,0.025897104,0.006649996,0.0054598856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011553145,0.009245188,0.23338817,0.0009837308,0.00010795691,0.0039783064,0.12961629,0.0025002246,0.0072499206,0.14700429,0.042832434,0.42193815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076796213,0.00646529,0.33418593,0.0034853665,0.00043715918,0.0019181422,0.3274905,0.015530817,0.013727736,0.10559225,0.18972719,0.0006717355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025917392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070085704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04194157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010053602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04889184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1403085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123620114","doi":"10.29173/mlj875","title":"Ethical Lawyering in a Global Community","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Political science; Practice of law; Legal practice; Public relations; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Face (sociological concept); Human rights; Legal profession; Law; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Social science","score_opus":0.07254332960041042,"score_gpt":0.398463203177447,"score_spread":0.32591987357703656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123620114","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018549154,0.008282237,0.003907418,0.48543185,0.0035216578,0.00007470512,0.0000247654,0.00008696653,0.48012114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5924536,0.005518799,0.00630077,0.22351393,0.0024616364,0.00015168154,0.000056797642,0.00016878152,0.169374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98725975,0.007865799,0.00017295429,0.0009011679,0.0017685917,0.0020317305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885483,0.003029419,0.0007078677,0.0010849226,0.0019452953,0.004684276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014184683,0.00046469583,0.00044366592,0.00079142064,0.019595934,0.013266139,0.0010013955,0.010324814,0.01604647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145502305,0.00027377543,0.00042039767,0.00089920696,0.03439351,0.0066354247,0.012908918,0.011988584,0.0019241953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008830223,0.00007746722,0.0013606552,0.000074693075,0.000012414879,0.00052785175,0.034505043,0.00014146559,0.00026431895,0.7380846,0.19605118,0.028891493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018335928,0.00002251013,0.0009506457,0.00046672468,0.000008475501,0.00039824398,0.027460406,0.0001668731,0.0001369311,0.17395525,0.7963977,0.000017869821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01604754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04729796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019595934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006591033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03470229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07501668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123663656","doi":"","title":"Governance Gone Wrong: Examining Self-Regulation of the Legal Profession","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Duty of loyalty; Accountability; Duty; Loyalty; Function (biology); Legal profession; Duty of care; Political science; Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Fiduciary; Finance","score_opus":0.02082751628786775,"score_gpt":0.3391165956976519,"score_spread":0.3182890794097841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123663656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6917997,0.0014954803,0.0054158373,0.052443504,0.00010588506,0.0000925107,0.000037269456,0.000019502664,0.24859037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997182,0.00016251873,0.00018883217,0.0009191136,0.000012343174,0.000013182152,0.00000805834,0.000003870692,0.001510167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833482,0.00830705,0.00036444355,0.0011048873,0.0036089483,0.0032664773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767644,0.009629676,0.0046503167,0.0015605827,0.004571693,0.0028233288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01533593,0.00013541564,0.00031160886,0.0014225019,0.009569432,0.010234252,0.0014479596,0.0028684852,0.0016265073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018644717,0.00019935146,0.00042178112,0.0016823675,0.043503977,0.0058742594,0.004523628,0.0031263432,0.00013385926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018519368,0.00010124271,0.04347977,0.00005746782,0.00001750563,0.00020716974,0.17980717,0.00060566224,0.00023917927,0.76263165,0.001961167,0.010873413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056087953,0.00013496415,0.17727952,0.0008019857,0.000048039998,0.00015957629,0.4216022,0.0042632213,0.0007492529,0.27946293,0.115362026,0.00008014852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33661944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3275852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33661944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04813559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04553769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6693202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123686802","doi":"","title":"Incorporating a Creative Component in First-Year Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Rubric; Creativity; Originality; Law and literature; Legal writing; Casebook; Psychology; Tort; Law; The arts; Sociology; Pedagogy; Legal research; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.044264228098679505,"score_gpt":0.355314756831533,"score_spread":0.3110505287328535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123686802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9336189,0.0002764844,0.004876532,0.0019062776,0.00019145453,0.0005183653,0.000052149677,0.00025402603,0.058305938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96367824,0.00031103665,0.010460472,0.00089424575,0.000051551233,0.000388599,0.00007161577,0.0000562955,0.024087967],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954041,0.0015622946,0.00022204079,0.00042013754,0.0011162,0.0012751806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98751277,0.002915195,0.0013669553,0.0010948566,0.0008176093,0.0062926076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005693798,0.0006912622,0.00046362975,0.0017087986,0.0057860096,0.009973946,0.0024000646,0.0022333218,0.020758742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011670692,0.0005934632,0.0007975093,0.00064974,0.0043491223,0.003717298,0.011344458,0.0032520199,0.0028720978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000367361,0.020851828,0.111987725,0.0015402741,0.000045151348,0.0062285755,0.25090602,0.0009842197,0.022734212,0.04473013,0.039670445,0.499954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003212604,0.005483771,0.17694516,0.0012140952,0.00006506459,0.0073139514,0.19851673,0.0026040697,0.013786298,0.022443935,0.57103676,0.0002688968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060616725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034210032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020758742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014592911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002915147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069444954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123697437","doi":"","title":"Follow the Drinking Gourd: Our Road to Teaching Critical Race Theory and Slavery and the Law, Contemplatively, at McGill","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical race theory; Race (biology); Sociology; Law; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03033312088957343,"score_gpt":0.39038510647878377,"score_spread":0.36005198558921037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123697437","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03367572,0.011502785,0.006615489,0.7895694,0.003667687,0.00006795823,0.00007052924,0.00016721334,0.15466315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6146934,0.009398069,0.01032211,0.13471621,0.0023389605,0.00020359407,0.00004431618,0.00039488426,0.22788848],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979862,0.0010576736,0.00002347713,0.00017407924,0.0003326915,0.0004259643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950582,0.0024923636,0.00026762843,0.00014203694,0.00043913355,0.0016006831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002409652,0.00029814488,0.00021975925,0.0005514688,0.012773052,0.005926983,0.0017915223,0.0028667592,0.011870855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068763136,0.00030849804,0.0001686206,0.00057129393,0.018463843,0.005585482,0.004261066,0.0072736014,0.0012819476],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003884146,0.00007591571,0.0016276945,0.00017257167,0.0000049610967,0.00039734395,0.12078313,0.00019509853,0.0015877434,0.38447186,0.4191729,0.07147202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012550946,0.000049395385,0.0018606047,0.0003376721,0.0000064377327,0.00012317272,0.043976642,0.0002687947,0.0010967258,0.07200665,0.88022476,0.00003647342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2656458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49680087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7343542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014468643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018167717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52819914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123737599","doi":"","title":"Women in the Legal Profession","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Feminization (sociology); Remuneration; Inequality; Legal education; Political science; Legal research; Gender inequality; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03134890043543729,"score_gpt":0.3625063205692725,"score_spread":0.3311574201338352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123737599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3729694,0.077890776,0.0014818056,0.22704911,0.0033214237,0.000054787084,0.0002499485,0.00004251586,0.31694028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86534387,0.028324937,0.00044596547,0.024470592,0.0010266636,0.00004488034,0.000068801455,0.00003690623,0.0802374],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979717,0.0008431397,0.000043180633,0.00019100435,0.0003716283,0.00057929085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998288,0.00059623277,0.00021130808,0.000046217512,0.00019901739,0.0006592628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002662913,0.00017180204,0.0003857292,0.001002668,0.008544084,0.0044886936,0.00039119,0.0012725324,0.016063599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004965521,0.00014128559,0.00014556843,0.0013155513,0.006550209,0.003238579,0.004218303,0.0015271584,0.0019298798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012298695,0.00011091476,0.034509376,0.0003109127,0.000014978733,0.0015586928,0.446081,0.00006703413,0.0013944044,0.2780035,0.07020378,0.16762236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011473404,0.00006939411,0.00990081,0.00053142087,0.000010350756,0.00074753485,0.1835758,0.000027483526,0.00019777972,0.013819219,0.7910922,0.000016451264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013067205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01724273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016063599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024904108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003894854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053738117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123770708","doi":"","title":"The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Beginning to Examine the Implications for Canadian Lawyers' Professional Responsibilities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Law; Dignity; Political science; Impartiality; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.14930393819750493,"score_gpt":0.470061465587707,"score_spread":0.3207575273902021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123770708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010653049,0.0453632,0.0054710335,0.4621159,0.0061799777,0.00017189105,0.00054373173,0.00014152243,0.46935976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40014517,0.081295155,0.017301483,0.16753504,0.0026779869,0.00019548541,0.0005431295,0.00031399616,0.3299926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830966,0.0016401974,0.00038051303,0.001059428,0.009058631,0.00476456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902014,0.0024265752,0.00034953048,0.00042914535,0.0047272127,0.0018661298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009097422,0.00059445587,0.00058264146,0.002632395,0.02532898,0.014785991,0.0029792788,0.009689396,0.009051448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018555341,0.0005536859,0.00060703885,0.004080143,0.022142088,0.00813546,0.005528405,0.012517466,0.0012071461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010840478,0.000018018947,0.00061654195,0.00013271478,0.0000034309994,0.00013693988,0.008998728,0.00015079255,0.00025545023,0.84478784,0.09820029,0.046688482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006009486,0.000009143608,0.0021033748,0.00047987825,0.0000063294983,0.00005925219,0.0059820255,0.00018274385,0.00014407808,0.029636215,0.9613345,0.00005645532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99342793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8570593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1429407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3369966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123783354","doi":"","title":"Clinical Legal Education in a Dangerous Time","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Injustice; Economic Justice; Political science; Clinical Practice; Legal risk; Law; Legal psychology; Theme (computing); Legal practice; Medicine; Nursing; Business","score_opus":0.020515714529972168,"score_gpt":0.4099396874013594,"score_spread":0.3894239728713872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123783354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012598668,0.006465789,0.002646246,0.85464495,0.010340404,0.000049471393,0.00003238413,0.00014285388,0.11307929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4672383,0.00784718,0.0085069025,0.41954827,0.0065062535,0.00017689643,0.00010410745,0.00024357892,0.08982854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983934,0.008482622,0.00045200088,0.0008793155,0.0029046778,0.0033473822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602293,0.008103394,0.0019645444,0.001146113,0.0022788027,0.026277844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119992355,0.00047783196,0.0006654622,0.0013945571,0.020661782,0.013744318,0.0018366204,0.012113429,0.03356583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028812153,0.00043086626,0.0005368789,0.000917727,0.0226457,0.015343512,0.018549759,0.022545414,0.005771041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007146759,0.00052893895,0.0028831987,0.00027681966,0.000014049014,0.0036684226,0.044475712,0.00032906994,0.00041303222,0.45312956,0.4130879,0.08112184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034226807,0.00012038716,0.0009440258,0.001014588,0.000005180482,0.0013163942,0.0493925,0.00013353811,0.00017791035,0.15035042,0.7964654,0.000045377674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065952362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021737492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03356583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0088639455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03968944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11228883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123808924","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5007","title":"DESIGNING ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Public administration; Government (linguistics); Relation (database); Political science; Administration of justice; Administrative law; Adaptation (eye); Sociology; Law; Geography; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.24663566810625512,"score_gpt":0.5011033493798046,"score_spread":0.25446768127354946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123808924","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020906145,0.0018606306,0.74636334,0.017289354,0.00093687535,0.0016832561,0.00016839856,0.0012317324,0.20956029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35773814,0.0020150517,0.5957974,0.0028321673,0.00016317991,0.002093914,0.00037817963,0.00069936854,0.03828258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93422395,0.052100956,0.0020654176,0.0031831474,0.005643547,0.002782962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96232086,0.022107735,0.0017919026,0.0072723506,0.0043548616,0.00215222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03796011,0.0011634274,0.0007861021,0.0029649916,0.0111368485,0.015528647,0.0042739674,0.0036149896,0.012901099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050450437,0.0010208095,0.0013927096,0.0020019743,0.020825775,0.011519393,0.010725712,0.003668929,0.0026223985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045184122,0.00018517557,0.0026651644,0.0008730336,0.000047296275,0.00035293517,0.07351743,0.004704438,0.0010839748,0.79369396,0.014647834,0.10818367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043589025,0.00016252598,0.00072882033,0.0010129734,0.00004187289,0.00041059355,0.042233396,0.0032843864,0.0014904818,0.23989692,0.7106265,0.000068046254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066419123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0123709375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03796011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011624948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022083994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20075464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123843831","doi":"","title":"How do we Regulate Activities within a Charity Law Framework Focussed on Purposes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Public relations","score_opus":0.19313057800454955,"score_gpt":0.3927724950033633,"score_spread":0.19964191699881376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123843831","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049581427,0.0056740725,0.07007938,0.47791246,0.002506802,0.0002960571,0.00011109856,0.0002997761,0.39353892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8568587,0.0029822115,0.022291172,0.08758514,0.0009585343,0.00048306983,0.00007123973,0.0002543356,0.028515657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94805276,0.025768556,0.0018438018,0.006306388,0.009610451,0.008417988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9148112,0.035992485,0.009029187,0.012893291,0.018319476,0.008954417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060534768,0.00054262235,0.0009860984,0.0023674255,0.011413178,0.027421268,0.0039387094,0.013820214,0.0038194985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08019508,0.0010809442,0.0012170897,0.0019624468,0.07430471,0.027673434,0.007895917,0.020539237,0.001941474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010755579,0.00005274926,0.0015902994,0.0001069023,0.000020018151,0.00007759956,0.013905951,0.000497093,0.0003245269,0.9622443,0.009721283,0.01144854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004695428,0.00007024071,0.0040391474,0.0018083998,0.00006262281,0.00018429669,0.018552298,0.0008100617,0.00080484117,0.7068909,0.26660532,0.0001249405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07633077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067471854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07633077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01853594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060535166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3201422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123858248","doi":"","title":"The Attorney General as Lawyer (?): Confidentiality Upon Resignation from Cabinet","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Confidentiality; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.05266366982271948,"score_gpt":0.3597360286326949,"score_spread":0.3070723588099754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123858248","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28494903,0.006062499,0.019205404,0.4253461,0.0015635882,0.00010652504,0.000037690395,0.00013669924,0.26259246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96067077,0.0006761615,0.0023587472,0.015565127,0.00024787022,0.00002684658,0.000008092416,0.000033974135,0.02041238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98862606,0.006678866,0.00031004552,0.0009912675,0.0013088937,0.0020848562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917247,0.004180482,0.0011685839,0.0007712885,0.0008580864,0.0012968283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010462286,0.00013671958,0.00021644124,0.0004548335,0.008896971,0.006877124,0.0009629793,0.008898477,0.0035932458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017357176,0.00029651972,0.00023896215,0.00042536564,0.015138838,0.0056971675,0.00490558,0.008609314,0.00056992174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005987944,0.000049669838,0.005879894,0.000073602416,0.000009080432,0.0034081792,0.063433826,0.00019233298,0.0011033338,0.8728294,0.01999471,0.032966204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004714277,0.00017283227,0.014898161,0.0007833494,0.000022824077,0.008479591,0.115956925,0.0012934105,0.0034741582,0.22496298,0.62977976,0.00012884055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00718666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013648263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010462286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004247982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006644911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055330515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123927232","doi":"","title":"REGULATING LAW FIRMS IN CANADA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public law; Law; Commercial law; Private law; Comparative law; Business; Municipal law; Audit; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.07193141210284187,"score_gpt":0.36025841307170736,"score_spread":0.2883270009688655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123927232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16384639,0.021008704,0.0044262735,0.35365623,0.0014970013,0.00035882147,0.00052623614,0.00020730525,0.454473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8488569,0.009497701,0.0025847484,0.06260355,0.00024246152,0.00005735764,0.00022973292,0.000042792188,0.07588476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882669,0.0010153694,0.00026078563,0.0010450293,0.0048544533,0.0045573628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771115,0.0034047829,0.0014998507,0.0007035916,0.013151086,0.0041292333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061875135,0.00022567419,0.00025224805,0.0016102777,0.017606905,0.008188549,0.0020524901,0.004615288,0.0038370793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01878956,0.00037142457,0.00030482624,0.002625692,0.00888747,0.0018247041,0.0021517272,0.00481831,0.00032138996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025625208,0.00006982755,0.017307794,0.0002753319,0.00002816747,0.000555955,0.012647163,0.0012105451,0.0019562815,0.737756,0.13628162,0.091885746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029653254,0.00003818291,0.0447199,0.00043915436,0.00005584036,0.00012565962,0.0102926465,0.0009579708,0.0013159988,0.017045492,0.9248779,0.000101642094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98782504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8702138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12978618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38833365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94166905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123949424","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Case Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.07285255859072085,"score_gpt":0.3677765656678758,"score_spread":0.29492400707715494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123949424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008325883,0.004711777,0.0006408013,0.032769866,0.0017003503,0.00040922867,0.013388309,0.00080919167,0.94473785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033667954,0.0024740167,0.00086251466,0.0053110425,0.00022477497,0.0001392992,0.0032291193,0.00024512838,0.9841472],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944186,0.00038464868,0.00028372658,0.00029334085,0.0035733676,0.0010463477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98365915,0.002592366,0.00028064227,0.00053722376,0.011199049,0.0017316394],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046795453,0.00151136,0.0009632082,0.0077243093,0.013646743,0.014754004,0.003732112,0.017769942,0.33480144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02186752,0.0014757765,0.00090752414,0.012383055,0.0040237256,0.0049444675,0.0032556155,0.005071775,0.080472775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037348225,0.000012369773,0.000062014304,0.000049084116,7.0011794e-7,0.000019552728,0.00007674596,0.00004716517,0.000015715315,0.013812877,0.9788943,0.007005803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068605555,0.0000023772657,0.0007788829,0.00015738205,0.0000025444112,0.000016460157,0.00024114024,0.00009614095,0.000035408204,0.0023426933,0.9962997,0.000020577416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97104466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33480144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083909445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25819167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.948825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123960466","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4719","title":"Anything Goes: An Apology for Parallel Distributed Legal Science","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Interpretation (philosophy); Legal realism; Legal science; Strengths and weaknesses; Value (mathematics); Legal profession; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06997384762087296,"score_gpt":0.4117177567235346,"score_spread":0.34174390910266167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123960466","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012332684,0.004083167,0.12084859,0.71001893,0.0062211184,0.00010721158,0.00008311956,0.0003995172,0.14590566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7742832,0.0028854036,0.0803693,0.0767685,0.008454973,0.00061529834,0.00013143831,0.0005993907,0.05589254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.980243,0.0082946345,0.0008573754,0.003395916,0.0062450804,0.0009640159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586972,0.021968372,0.0019264523,0.010463482,0.004775259,0.002169274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02823608,0.0005547315,0.0009142251,0.0017862703,0.0067161024,0.01245275,0.003592056,0.01134616,0.010938097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05711021,0.00046828296,0.0011852483,0.0012571525,0.0420607,0.033884432,0.011081642,0.023159862,0.0019932978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001114741,0.0000122496685,0.000060144455,0.000020051948,0.0000038305297,0.000037700807,0.0004846767,0.00016770247,0.000039332248,0.99079037,0.00539738,0.0029754054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022453778,0.000009516009,0.000055909008,0.00004372257,0.0000036611286,0.000048111575,0.00026626364,0.001145868,0.00006395125,0.9665023,0.031831294,0.0000067911733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002098234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018984899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02823608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008546488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007163504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14932841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124038656","doi":"","title":"Evaluating the Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning As a Method of Engaging Year One Law Students.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Student engagement; Curriculum; Perception; Psychology; Work (physics); Mathematics education; Focus group; Problem-based learning; Medical education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social psychology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.2895863813078582,"score_gpt":0.5279764536715095,"score_spread":0.23839007236365128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124038656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99195224,0.0002451993,0.002112537,0.00016154697,0.000055336113,0.0017221932,0.000036185837,0.000059544003,0.003655269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761804,0.0006825366,0.017855698,0.00019185107,0.000040635696,0.0018186263,0.00014112993,0.000026769563,0.0030624298],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925741,0.004314506,0.0004575283,0.0005759759,0.0016106494,0.00046723816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96114945,0.027312996,0.0037498951,0.0012628149,0.0033669039,0.00315793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009727185,0.0007364629,0.00048100782,0.0010913735,0.0008390249,0.0017205349,0.0013478113,0.00083785964,0.0022490988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04065511,0.0002654686,0.0005306,0.0005029205,0.00071532483,0.0011601577,0.0014739219,0.0011383682,0.00043265766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057428824,0.08136278,0.039346073,0.0034809066,0.0003274893,0.00032877328,0.039244257,0.0024605447,0.022931388,0.0013721833,0.0024482491,0.8009546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005215725,0.4856225,0.3218446,0.0018181904,0.0012281999,0.0010961714,0.03934883,0.007922093,0.08863523,0.0022071693,0.044656955,0.0004043991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011006136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023086425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009727185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013336849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019456084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05144286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124172935","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Youth Overrepresentation in Canadian Correctional Services: Judicial and Non-Judicial Actors and Influence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial opinion; Criminology; Judicial discretion; Judicial review; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.01578057304518472,"score_gpt":0.349938155960879,"score_spread":0.3341575829156943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124172935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98598844,0.00078267267,0.000040898623,0.004144611,0.000046330864,0.00002307436,0.00023122615,0.0000046691457,0.008738196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997276,0.00052252144,0.000043340533,0.00037906165,0.00001556934,0.000008066037,0.000064789405,0.00000740929,0.0016831503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930836,0.0010005567,0.00016657588,0.0003278856,0.0014473792,0.0039739553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865515,0.0020870308,0.002560002,0.00028569877,0.0038024026,0.0047132256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029798397,0.00022127118,0.00043735965,0.0029612444,0.012186651,0.0047026104,0.0024967454,0.0013170788,0.007028322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013369702,0.00038820464,0.0004879862,0.0054237247,0.004059854,0.0013439365,0.0029930125,0.0026902552,0.00030084632],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001451763,0.00012722272,0.824067,0.000091082446,0.00004929205,0.00060533953,0.14930664,0.00006500988,0.00020173386,0.0040456234,0.005728401,0.015567591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008597272,0.000027114498,0.6965118,0.00023546422,0.000044913853,0.00021148221,0.2954665,0.00011290609,0.000095478725,0.0003488971,0.006904731,0.00003213904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03197911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03197911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07506687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2320258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124202993","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.16.2.373","title":"Canada: Depending on the Kindness of Strangers—Access to Civil Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Kindness; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.16969157696549309,"score_gpt":0.4332841545108171,"score_spread":0.263592577545324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124202993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19314232,0.02311228,0.00067909225,0.6025817,0.001549444,0.00012949732,0.0051430664,0.00008046608,0.17358229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8614447,0.011994618,0.0009400015,0.06368702,0.00020985742,0.000073815696,0.00092994585,0.000081833394,0.06063825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968604,0.00026036106,0.000075571734,0.00016893502,0.0010386946,0.0015960246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907177,0.0007837015,0.00043224465,0.000116095565,0.0033162767,0.0046338597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020465935,0.00024152783,0.00040797467,0.0010388052,0.026824515,0.0061862823,0.0017116129,0.0032752887,0.011497685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006904982,0.0004079628,0.00046807903,0.0027876282,0.00500757,0.0025485053,0.0042015337,0.0054379464,0.00044921093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019692027,0.000091938,0.070464835,0.00028138608,0.0000594969,0.0015247767,0.042522408,0.00024401359,0.00068641984,0.105894886,0.68561167,0.09242124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095985124,0.000045441284,0.25413346,0.0009510851,0.00010945163,0.00062605867,0.14219908,0.00030189138,0.00058733404,0.012964389,0.5876997,0.00028602162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119826004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119826004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28900653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8694026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124205390","doi":"","title":"Transcending Boundaries in Legal Education: A Vehicle for Teaching Students to Think Critically","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Curriculum; Engineering ethics; Politics; State (computer science); Sociology; Pedagogy; Perspective (graphical); Agile software development; Political science; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.015757752838406313,"score_gpt":0.39612800262886216,"score_spread":0.38037024979045586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124205390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47191617,0.0021825081,0.18254732,0.06046389,0.0010015261,0.000804681,0.000041425177,0.00087476504,0.28016776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87867534,0.0011327137,0.09156515,0.0058799875,0.00014095742,0.0005767586,0.00003727374,0.00015644089,0.021835353],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642533,0.0021629762,0.00009370328,0.00031063383,0.0006308312,0.00037643532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914027,0.0042614914,0.0009032381,0.00067976903,0.00057038513,0.0021824443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058017564,0.0004682312,0.00029210572,0.0012452115,0.0046854904,0.007738401,0.0015442108,0.002465561,0.0068702037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011334521,0.0003539297,0.00039455906,0.0005693085,0.014462212,0.0074818097,0.013110711,0.0069059376,0.0017993554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046467667,0.00093785446,0.0048221606,0.000329281,0.000008585184,0.0010021718,0.53608775,0.00063830655,0.009971069,0.23274954,0.020500464,0.19290633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092770446,0.000558456,0.003946829,0.00164536,0.000020954318,0.0014647709,0.23076442,0.002736307,0.0069434233,0.35975137,0.39198783,0.000087441986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013088064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035750957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007738401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028174438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00798117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030682981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124351038","doi":"","title":"Bend or Break: Enhancing the Responsibilities of Law Societies to Promote Access to Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Legal profession; Professional responsibility; Sociology","score_opus":0.10084808654946732,"score_gpt":0.41099297546435853,"score_spread":0.3101448889148912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124351038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15351948,0.0022166884,0.026832832,0.38353103,0.001992999,0.0006645691,0.00010530082,0.0006943981,0.43044272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83530563,0.001158128,0.02509785,0.071028665,0.00023428284,0.0003738647,0.000101578706,0.00021990624,0.066480085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98383486,0.006358751,0.00016988214,0.00085528777,0.0023098004,0.006471465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973887,0.003366761,0.0014851509,0.0013612405,0.0027742647,0.017125655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01283445,0.00073477416,0.00037456007,0.0020177865,0.023645738,0.015565297,0.004113219,0.007965555,0.0237567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0272275,0.00065126515,0.00082315,0.0012495362,0.018502584,0.015480862,0.024085972,0.0106403865,0.0032332833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014482584,0.0009872898,0.016705586,0.00047531285,0.000056473895,0.0012304492,0.19481358,0.0007300578,0.0042134207,0.5070062,0.13313977,0.14049709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010991198,0.00034702808,0.027617196,0.0009691529,0.000089749556,0.00036343164,0.23415421,0.0011759907,0.0017801054,0.1269475,0.606316,0.00012967493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15961266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35006887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15961266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023994626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06672411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3173672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124390615","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice Online: Are Canadian Court Websites Accessible to Users with Visual Impairments?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Economic Justice; Internet privacy; Political science; Diversity (politics); Public relations; Web accessibility; Business; The Internet; Law; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.04136730038291625,"score_gpt":0.39472268862887394,"score_spread":0.3533553882459577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124390615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8717975,0.0010628325,0.00043693997,0.015422318,0.000083352024,0.00017645842,0.0010114941,0.00008631456,0.10992281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99261934,0.00086563,0.00050748454,0.0011987085,0.000011501342,0.000042698935,0.00022424337,0.000018158456,0.004512234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966454,0.00056956,0.00012979428,0.00024447808,0.0014936189,0.0009171589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838594,0.004753918,0.0022717828,0.00078166893,0.005347798,0.0029852425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027347642,0.0002058727,0.00029541444,0.0021406382,0.007479748,0.007107837,0.0012025452,0.000989492,0.013107454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03276087,0.00024094753,0.00030634442,0.0028534064,0.0030812246,0.0046273894,0.0024035994,0.0011782814,0.0008225509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002674231,0.0006047296,0.40790868,0.0006640161,0.00005566163,0.0018037059,0.21271583,0.00019286467,0.0011998531,0.00948056,0.06095418,0.30415243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028994347,0.00009557516,0.593921,0.0012443075,0.000076704564,0.00065733935,0.30135655,0.00070881535,0.0006069101,0.001972082,0.09919336,0.00013841139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89488363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9505258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10511637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014431186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029826697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21147078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124425142","doi":"","title":"Legal Inquiry: A Liberal Arts Experiment in Demystifying Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal arts education; Legal education; Vocabulary; Law; The arts; Legal research; Sociology; Legal profession; Critical thinking; Legal writing; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Pedagogy; Higher education; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06575299486152254,"score_gpt":0.3291856381937362,"score_spread":0.26343264333221367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124425142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94277465,0.0001248322,0.004292452,0.0087399185,0.0002806114,0.002122139,0.00017763376,0.00014041083,0.041347355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95028615,0.00020571817,0.01625792,0.006388332,0.00016438897,0.0067897495,0.00025628766,0.0000824117,0.019569155],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98491377,0.010483441,0.00045701134,0.0010492603,0.0018345302,0.0012620414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961773,0.027187742,0.001846197,0.002565707,0.0014575984,0.0051696952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019061828,0.00080075476,0.0008463185,0.0014306061,0.009260818,0.0059261653,0.0034771052,0.005184873,0.016662462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030217089,0.0008211394,0.0006484919,0.0010688367,0.012603242,0.006086934,0.008463111,0.009739958,0.0018464292],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010748853,0.1618742,0.010496521,0.001037141,0.00008205317,0.0028273081,0.4988581,0.0018955139,0.024627065,0.17099205,0.026644915,0.089916304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02068534,0.07163245,0.027137948,0.0007324286,0.00013691581,0.0018030917,0.30922025,0.011873058,0.027549094,0.2099347,0.31874442,0.000550297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019093279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029818392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019061828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030157263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004194198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10080981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124470084","doi":"","title":"The Teaching of Procedure Across Common Law Systems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Scholarship; Legal education; Economic Justice; Subject (documents); Legal profession; Legal research; Political science; Curriculum; Legal history; Empirical legal studies; Civil procedure; Sociology","score_opus":0.03524496154442219,"score_gpt":0.41586941710367215,"score_spread":0.38062445555924995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124470084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31423122,0.0074398397,0.033381723,0.033929523,0.00042788745,0.0001540768,0.000057487057,0.00024568112,0.61013263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97939163,0.002309772,0.0037184462,0.0014636556,0.000084527426,0.00005619561,0.00002311206,0.00006468272,0.0128879165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98310983,0.007473899,0.0005992354,0.0012811882,0.0038100854,0.0037258416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887488,0.0059145275,0.0010736445,0.0011616906,0.0015432881,0.0015581329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008085083,0.00027914307,0.00043892715,0.002893425,0.012524924,0.010106326,0.0020314965,0.0025499263,0.0044301297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017861674,0.0003241233,0.0005535769,0.0032986528,0.04274293,0.0069294805,0.008888616,0.0035877237,0.00054364325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024515179,0.00006120626,0.0034864452,0.00019106166,0.000009816846,0.00018342408,0.11554719,0.00070613343,0.0006450884,0.7743982,0.0032734398,0.10147344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041840536,0.00024885384,0.033554398,0.0017881492,0.00005072671,0.0005098702,0.19211565,0.002563946,0.0025642577,0.24128866,0.52516353,0.000110134264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.173641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22632037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.173641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03189552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046327006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34526056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124613849","doi":"","title":"Transforming Students, Transforming Self: The Power of Teaching Social Justice Struggles in Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Globalization; Context (archaeology); Sustainability; Sociology; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Political science; Convergence (economics); Political economy; Economic growth; Law; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.04755250597346342,"score_gpt":0.3019058795186739,"score_spread":0.2543533735452105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124613849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3696464,0.017605215,0.023632629,0.22080876,0.0043746512,0.0003057859,0.00004519695,0.0004954119,0.36308593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659069,0.0045509674,0.004545277,0.008257625,0.00045027494,0.00022207094,0.000015788413,0.00015093085,0.015900146],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862223,0.011395906,0.000096753705,0.0004884545,0.00057901395,0.0012174983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99150896,0.005198356,0.00039237452,0.000489121,0.00028884574,0.0021223293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009171556,0.00084052765,0.0006915507,0.001364247,0.023193417,0.018898537,0.0023035533,0.0043257377,0.0038639086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010148809,0.00041504682,0.00043685833,0.001129323,0.0765817,0.014070149,0.01793709,0.010633732,0.0007182457],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018852339,0.00014348321,0.0011639555,0.0001279271,0.000008067094,0.00035757292,0.8303904,0.00014552663,0.00030588507,0.13322322,0.010398486,0.023716561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002461444,0.00009131072,0.0006767693,0.00041504402,0.000010434722,0.00025584435,0.6865514,0.0002046628,0.0005243092,0.09477601,0.2164486,0.000020979285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007488157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019462857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023193417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009208735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012192358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06681436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124858383","doi":"","title":"A False Start in Constitutionalizing Lawyer Loyalty in Canada (Attorney General) v. Federation of Law Societies of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Duty; Supreme court; Constitutionality; Principle of legality; Political science; Charter; Economic Justice; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06657278010876357,"score_gpt":0.3278317341651744,"score_spread":0.26125895405641086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124858383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121936515,0.012672413,0.010178315,0.4117637,0.0020925836,0.0003239657,0.00063629035,0.00025374047,0.44014254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85350335,0.0020604297,0.0035726312,0.09852711,0.00055754744,0.00014451938,0.000116511284,0.00009950676,0.041418333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97395384,0.004080169,0.00076703297,0.0027310166,0.008850632,0.009617291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98746526,0.004897602,0.0004453463,0.0007358856,0.004053944,0.0024019603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015820017,0.0006242147,0.0012047464,0.00177136,0.039261077,0.02273227,0.0055745966,0.025577974,0.003469607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025052112,0.0011566586,0.0013063574,0.0021531712,0.03262641,0.007384606,0.0068680467,0.029362205,0.00033165593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018148889,0.000015579273,0.00070758717,0.000025835838,0.000018753484,0.00013235613,0.0044913497,0.00019112452,0.00015582847,0.9784177,0.0124314865,0.0033942163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026637854,0.00017547674,0.012982146,0.0011428333,0.00031919946,0.00023380962,0.019617038,0.0035909563,0.0021220737,0.46048263,0.49821562,0.0008518684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98201066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1416803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1416803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22310351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124874323","doi":"10.1002/alt.20184","title":"The next frontier is anticipation: Thinking ahead about conflict to help clients find constructive ways to engage issues in advance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Constructive; Frontier; Conflict resolution; Dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Law; Process (computing); Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0723621853721421,"score_gpt":0.4166558202737395,"score_spread":0.34429363490159737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124874323","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12683521,0.0025406906,0.24114196,0.382596,0.0019878044,0.0007080507,0.00007574322,0.0025293184,0.24158531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8227931,0.0021639508,0.1331013,0.01569089,0.0004001942,0.0002382125,0.000062826955,0.00018448301,0.02536501],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903951,0.006747797,0.00032155946,0.00042160988,0.0009911306,0.0011226835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780125,0.012293714,0.0020197886,0.0013027355,0.0019670804,0.004404175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018761283,0.00063151395,0.00047364883,0.0012232064,0.005964079,0.012582898,0.0019010376,0.005054602,0.018668568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01883765,0.0004579742,0.0007903825,0.00057074556,0.0080764,0.0108474,0.00936185,0.008909169,0.0034952976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026295948,0.0016399475,0.0108979745,0.0010903957,0.000061894156,0.0020652201,0.1612139,0.0025428168,0.009789704,0.2285742,0.097484104,0.4843769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014940453,0.00076172006,0.0068894406,0.0016885248,0.000095789015,0.0030128523,0.24674915,0.011037577,0.007370353,0.4100073,0.31189725,0.00034074252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078451785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016697692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018761283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002083505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0092851445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099220276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124888583","doi":"10.7202/1074152ar","title":"Governing A.I.’s Professional Advice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Legal advice; Order (exchange); Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Professional association; Legal profession; Psychology; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.06806531519421341,"score_gpt":0.3834765777206284,"score_spread":0.31541126252641494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124888583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0234039,0.0024488631,0.027737292,0.45840794,0.0016365552,0.00021956167,0.00012765253,0.00032535568,0.4856928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71626407,0.0018389989,0.016385691,0.17730968,0.0017909878,0.00039627837,0.000080254176,0.00022618205,0.08570792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.966223,0.010812193,0.0018474025,0.005893275,0.009915167,0.0053090057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957832,0.02046731,0.0034793578,0.0037141952,0.0105399685,0.003967192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039098497,0.00030635143,0.0006649506,0.0010839413,0.008404652,0.009731802,0.0027005149,0.019048922,0.0064743725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07558633,0.00057606,0.00068870885,0.00076326285,0.020349715,0.006449517,0.00398738,0.015435525,0.0019786337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017020986,0.00003657477,0.0009317991,0.000032564047,0.000011888344,0.000121180165,0.0055712247,0.00023065736,0.00032202134,0.95172596,0.031062728,0.009936443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006206193,0.00006279458,0.002014781,0.00052678335,0.0000417985,0.00018205648,0.001989652,0.0019247842,0.00087491225,0.5086478,0.483574,0.00009856829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049551584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03870573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049551584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009788386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023858996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20677513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124894602","doi":"","title":"SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FOR ETHICS COUNSEL: LESSONS FOR CANADA FROM THE UNITED STATES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Jurisprudence; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Legal ethics; Subject (documents); Position (finance); Sociology; Business; Library science; History","score_opus":0.14173140897240344,"score_gpt":0.4145599334617979,"score_spread":0.2728285244893945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124894602","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042178746,0.04783619,0.0008072199,0.7800544,0.0023582897,0.000101342,0.000308267,0.000046540004,0.12630907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6825305,0.09128301,0.0041240337,0.16063574,0.0009037468,0.00011530157,0.0002793375,0.00010560617,0.060022753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901776,0.0018029049,0.00030177156,0.00058553414,0.003459236,0.0036728976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.962127,0.00808578,0.00095632847,0.0005767561,0.020471796,0.007782414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010661505,0.00042844733,0.0008748677,0.0024226245,0.02778649,0.013536077,0.0030738877,0.0073367604,0.00726285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028934117,0.0004397291,0.0007416727,0.0046513267,0.008620107,0.0045078234,0.0042160503,0.0092870435,0.0005279117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022943495,0.00019915603,0.012939238,0.0009115215,0.000077999925,0.0017526158,0.033713676,0.0009957403,0.00055016176,0.38051143,0.3825146,0.18560447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014089954,0.000105859,0.024683416,0.0034712001,0.00023734062,0.00035083594,0.06587111,0.0009836061,0.00052436924,0.038821165,0.86452365,0.0002865051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8202346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17976539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5411554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9513559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124903039","doi":"","title":"Risk Regulation for the Legal Profession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Normative; Political science; Law; Legal ethics; Public interest; Legal research; Complaint; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.030637421093672252,"score_gpt":0.4065176327351543,"score_spread":0.37588021164148205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124903039","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01577968,0.008572487,0.03865916,0.52518815,0.0018025419,0.000092723705,0.000079419166,0.00023152171,0.4095943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77853465,0.008090438,0.020178571,0.10951789,0.0027403787,0.00023366607,0.00011448791,0.00020953083,0.08038038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96182746,0.009815078,0.0009396147,0.0044543995,0.018753137,0.004210334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96767443,0.010720902,0.0020061356,0.0028237167,0.01356231,0.0032125858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025170088,0.0005788918,0.00050329335,0.0018661764,0.016948717,0.020569848,0.0026475517,0.012371246,0.0055788145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036573254,0.00041035903,0.0010605883,0.0011564901,0.04498633,0.008029461,0.006633187,0.014520178,0.001319849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025489846,0.000008893514,0.00029753087,0.000019397636,0.0000022636073,0.000028026361,0.0019384001,0.00017048875,0.00011170843,0.9850803,0.008016692,0.004323738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013607461,0.000022083044,0.0015738589,0.00047191684,0.000022814083,0.00013117648,0.0030595905,0.0013919842,0.00050124025,0.5864378,0.40630016,0.00007381028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29047063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2061412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29047063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050034713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08775826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5775598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124921385","doi":"","title":"Bridging The Gaps: How Cross-Disciplinary Training with MBAs Can Improve Transactional Education, Prepare Students for Private Practice, and Enhance University Life.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham journal of corporate & financial law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Practice of law; Apprenticeship; Legal profession; Casual; Legal writing; Sociology; Political science; Legal research; Psychology","score_opus":0.046291591885357905,"score_gpt":0.3496655658359715,"score_spread":0.3033739739506136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124921385","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10240511,0.033655565,0.041002847,0.50625175,0.009819042,0.001641264,0.00039960496,0.0020151313,0.3028097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5810374,0.032394428,0.15823087,0.07459767,0.002426311,0.0027401797,0.0006075153,0.00082818733,0.14713739],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961183,0.002087746,0.00009152529,0.00034298265,0.0004732206,0.0008861614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264574,0.0023945286,0.00029687112,0.00048778325,0.0008721284,0.0033029467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008791769,0.00066342193,0.0004137813,0.001262737,0.005637186,0.008854537,0.0031922597,0.0040505156,0.03659591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017406328,0.00046764087,0.00051583303,0.00085975253,0.0021263803,0.010495488,0.008401509,0.003616417,0.0076082638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012180674,0.0026230612,0.0050649126,0.00070606923,0.000041221916,0.0005095636,0.015321781,0.0006670301,0.0008199268,0.04730154,0.27978873,0.6470343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024483484,0.0011596958,0.018100258,0.005119078,0.00009996635,0.0007485938,0.053286977,0.0031988088,0.0017382454,0.13016017,0.78601116,0.00013215355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008739331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025350219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03659591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033447025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010372634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1224255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124966618","doi":"","title":"Law School as Social Innovation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Juncture; Framing (construction); Common core; Political science; Legal education; Law; Core (optical fiber); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.028580532272803216,"score_gpt":0.3905321881812325,"score_spread":0.36195165590842926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124966618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03794765,0.0048698974,0.014561071,0.1102031,0.001312947,0.00019717461,0.0000602945,0.00027967963,0.83056825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9171755,0.0025767074,0.0051053753,0.006506697,0.00063127343,0.00021529676,0.000045322224,0.00007418097,0.06766956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993397,0.0040483805,0.00015870348,0.0007070713,0.0007817882,0.0009070269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944864,0.0022615648,0.00052132003,0.0007991847,0.0005111106,0.0014204836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055836067,0.00032511394,0.00044351642,0.0017559831,0.010988757,0.014271594,0.0013911519,0.004937526,0.014049235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005774902,0.0002070499,0.00040515742,0.0016117678,0.04250134,0.010761335,0.01364707,0.004770357,0.0016573336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032706623,0.000046692017,0.00025362067,0.000035772744,0.0000030183671,0.000062405976,0.011295414,0.0001783539,0.000058161386,0.96941996,0.004947024,0.013696301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012545756,0.000051831288,0.0004983853,0.00020417909,0.0000045959514,0.00007829389,0.013026688,0.0005205919,0.00011729633,0.5875384,0.39793357,0.00001366545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047802282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064160842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014271594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0102611175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014669188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07444996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125182210","doi":"","title":"Of Academics and Professionals: The Difference Is in the Pay","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manager","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Order (exchange); Higher education; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Economics; Business; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.06273445515939466,"score_gpt":0.40595902039232756,"score_spread":0.3432245652329329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125182210","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022537723,0.06337577,0.0012818164,0.7682623,0.015472993,0.000020342328,0.00030639113,0.00006143525,0.12868121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63573325,0.0390261,0.0012423942,0.23560072,0.028474238,0.00009928064,0.00041532883,0.00021110945,0.05919764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886255,0.004470944,0.00034740902,0.0012596848,0.0036982028,0.0015981738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99025714,0.003910425,0.0008429904,0.00048799644,0.0019098108,0.0025916144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062162504,0.0003585168,0.00066312833,0.0018860481,0.0039015145,0.017507441,0.0010918769,0.0042321263,0.021534832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017357975,0.00032364007,0.00034787337,0.004085826,0.010486815,0.013646935,0.0049638725,0.007018226,0.0040844353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020017543,0.000096890224,0.008421932,0.00027342112,0.000021558479,0.00009749289,0.013329804,0.00008343893,0.00015379675,0.54019475,0.31090638,0.1262204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005459061,0.00014928434,0.025997842,0.0014252075,0.000018518302,0.00042035343,0.029535607,0.00013599703,0.000099442164,0.1622611,0.77983123,0.00007082669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054355823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004291045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021534832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055346033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049344674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07204121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125356111","doi":"","title":"Peer Review in Canada: Results from a Promising Experiment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Skepticism; Peer review; Political science; Criminal justice; Public relations; Legal profession; Competence (human resources); Quality assurance; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Service (business)","score_opus":0.10960221156646799,"score_gpt":0.37515587183563265,"score_spread":0.26555366026916466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125356111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88898337,0.0023257134,0.004561889,0.0054119467,0.00046064256,0.015903752,0.0016960087,0.00037796109,0.08027868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92499393,0.0024822627,0.01808864,0.003177393,0.00015811555,0.0065090535,0.0013334126,0.00018025067,0.04307687],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9405264,0.027616793,0.0017617898,0.004046077,0.022233678,0.0038151664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8148074,0.095585234,0.0077845277,0.011373522,0.060854208,0.00959516],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046272032,0.0009732961,0.0017440452,0.0013578442,0.012693548,0.005911097,0.0030748171,0.0029801498,0.008404612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14373171,0.00066357874,0.0008543595,0.0030398387,0.0047061965,0.0033833715,0.00288758,0.0024542194,0.0018429742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05538858,0.0931867,0.099680685,0.00550441,0.0013451331,0.0019015332,0.07651271,0.008091827,0.010084297,0.034612082,0.082048506,0.53164357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.042852268,0.06843847,0.4300512,0.0028808033,0.002405022,0.00072882546,0.06745428,0.04514857,0.014487931,0.030936448,0.2925691,0.0020471043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84131086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8913158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03661298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.108223826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31924736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125409677","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007432","title":"Revisiting the<i>Arthurs Report</i>Twenty Years Later","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Legal education; Institution; Law; Reputation; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.02481115879235112,"score_gpt":0.30914512783126363,"score_spread":0.2843339690389125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125409677","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004757648,0.009897735,0.0005327142,0.79391414,0.08389931,0.00011040921,0.00086525985,0.00015081668,0.105871975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059935275,0.014648357,0.000924588,0.23040356,0.028105836,0.00014855783,0.00080944266,0.000428478,0.6645959],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884744,0.0015295757,0.00040640065,0.0008238845,0.006730088,0.00203565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98328626,0.0023957603,0.0004672096,0.00082311087,0.010002896,0.003024686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078031532,0.000627767,0.00039017625,0.0022730508,0.010086925,0.011387582,0.0031507383,0.0079807695,0.014850438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029923683,0.0004903965,0.00060488144,0.0019084123,0.006355242,0.0036408703,0.0032886628,0.010545154,0.004630237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004647296,0.000011017247,0.0003474938,0.000027354652,0.0000020271616,0.00015923048,0.0016636562,0.000013985881,0.000090001005,0.011213419,0.98138934,0.00507789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011283107,0.0000035564208,0.0009350288,0.00009753762,0.0000019943247,0.00004151991,0.001891891,0.000012650051,0.00007010479,0.00029959838,0.9966325,0.000012529948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6770217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7588031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9732032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026796827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044174723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6497608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125450144","doi":"","title":"The Cost of Seeking Civil Justice in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Seekers; Political science; Civil rights; Business; Public economics; Criminology; Public administration; Economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.035260724157887606,"score_gpt":0.28367459786428906,"score_spread":0.24841387370640144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125450144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90430546,0.002855915,0.00024309874,0.030057892,0.00011179317,0.00006449676,0.002110465,0.00002017595,0.060230736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915912,0.0015667538,0.00020427513,0.0008964235,0.000021813816,0.0000082115475,0.00034305223,0.0000082638535,0.0053599537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970937,0.00023045017,0.000071168186,0.00012938627,0.0011052898,0.0013699481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99370617,0.00077085616,0.0009087605,0.00010778884,0.0022703712,0.0022359889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095103524,0.00017746807,0.0003407919,0.0015620213,0.008584495,0.0036115113,0.0012869935,0.0009710524,0.0068281027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009186807,0.00021664525,0.00033883905,0.0038145683,0.0019006586,0.00096527836,0.0018880455,0.0014804277,0.00022150994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042775902,0.00030297675,0.607169,0.00040571354,0.0002830587,0.0015345551,0.017646775,0.0065884115,0.0005057741,0.08666346,0.08417258,0.19429998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068383575,0.0001001098,0.8398372,0.00049291324,0.0002100521,0.0005841843,0.06267987,0.0072766207,0.00034159241,0.0071204742,0.081102215,0.00018644828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99761295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13249819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13249819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13777013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96134615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125479338","doi":"10.4324/9780429298004-4","title":"Women Lawyers and the Struggle for Change in Conflict and Transition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.12387662950211543,"score_gpt":0.36830485332688795,"score_spread":0.24442822382477253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125479338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4828564,0.020219695,0.0025620277,0.10616207,0.00076840376,0.000079302044,0.00003002031,0.00007414229,0.38724798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96682155,0.0017157237,0.0001978974,0.0026599625,0.00009638809,0.000029119494,0.0000075462713,0.00001705555,0.028454766],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950145,0.0032058924,0.000048153986,0.00023612451,0.0003926885,0.0011025906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783176,0.0012263891,0.00022072108,0.000082745704,0.00009871681,0.0005395574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033984468,0.00028959097,0.00041078668,0.0010870581,0.020317448,0.013467414,0.0012708864,0.003061677,0.0068882615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005658205,0.00024248495,0.00018377195,0.0013612774,0.041289937,0.0065576513,0.009414826,0.004937793,0.00057189784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019150937,0.000042937463,0.0013088128,0.00003926404,0.0000031470013,0.0006062546,0.811957,0.000048519312,0.00012719208,0.16394536,0.006223067,0.015679361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012090698,0.000035401335,0.0012224909,0.00015667168,0.000003237532,0.00049008185,0.7027163,0.000060955528,0.00012402974,0.02956595,0.2656025,0.000010269151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006998461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012705805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020317448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008485769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005555054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061568797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125537851","doi":"","title":"The First Women Lawyers: \"Piecemeal Progress and Circumscribed Success\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Legal profession; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.024583178638408927,"score_gpt":0.349152384188517,"score_spread":0.3245692055501081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125537851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42361408,0.007975534,0.0019912054,0.2049653,0.0013379653,0.00006981457,0.00008231981,0.0000881701,0.35987556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955121,0.0015925665,0.0003213704,0.005446102,0.00020205353,0.000031661515,0.000014266704,0.00005769365,0.03721325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911897,0.0039978153,0.00012303455,0.0007818766,0.0012427946,0.0026648275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913025,0.0048066853,0.0006809444,0.00043321186,0.0009937282,0.0017829926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008421841,0.0003757621,0.00042490222,0.0019194346,0.022961099,0.017260611,0.0012036373,0.0033634305,0.007393741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023483125,0.0004742079,0.00017691156,0.0014651191,0.03836859,0.009605827,0.013378108,0.0068995534,0.0008224507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004093322,0.000053171647,0.002491435,0.000048992428,0.0000046398213,0.00051200035,0.63861877,0.00005083855,0.0002855473,0.30422938,0.020670261,0.032994043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018454952,0.000060789615,0.0027860887,0.00031091511,0.0000064420897,0.00021935966,0.40305927,0.00006962681,0.00051222974,0.026902473,0.56602645,0.000027964594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020517964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042696185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022961099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011332106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011335745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082220614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125541173","doi":"","title":"Collaborative Policy-Making, Law Students, and Access to Justice: TheRewards of Destabilizing Institutional Patterns","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Humanities; Political science; Social justice; Sociology; Library science; Law; Criminology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.044282328353401054,"score_gpt":0.475541408780736,"score_spread":0.4312590804273349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125541173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8576751,0.0007777516,0.005440487,0.052225936,0.0001877276,0.00012959313,0.00014939696,0.000066939276,0.08334705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944964,0.00014982042,0.0006953195,0.0010442083,0.000011461606,0.000051591473,0.000020775138,0.00002257334,0.0035079105],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96896565,0.021473834,0.0007400764,0.0025608076,0.0026843457,0.0035753015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9589168,0.021773342,0.0030503282,0.0050772135,0.0047992105,0.006383061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024278581,0.00033719462,0.000628695,0.0024915366,0.030938784,0.024415962,0.0028466226,0.0027290662,0.010407263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03837216,0.000550673,0.00032714175,0.0040300274,0.0452059,0.009255071,0.025874909,0.0057325587,0.000613702],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060104674,0.00012666541,0.01588945,0.00007689404,0.000026340904,0.00042260115,0.84537417,0.00017648454,0.0005316832,0.117263064,0.0034289404,0.016623652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024208059,0.00002900289,0.0082086,0.00013319448,0.000012568476,0.00005898324,0.91967565,0.000253264,0.00037291893,0.019012582,0.052182943,0.00003619419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21271116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32640037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21271116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036774836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04625383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4229461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125639536","doi":"","title":"Examining the Websites of Canada’s ‘Top Sex Crime Lawyers’: The Ethical Parameters of Online Commercial Expression by the Criminal Defence Bar","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Political science; Legal profession; Law; Representation (politics); Sexual assault; Criminal justice; Criminology; Public relations; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.08650779171728705,"score_gpt":0.3537954904260776,"score_spread":0.26728769870879054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125639536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97493446,0.00023651072,0.000119681776,0.0031079496,0.000013814564,0.000038946357,0.00015171876,0.000010458286,0.021386508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995271,0.00028479833,0.00017934943,0.0004895016,0.000007928829,0.000013897704,0.00008586187,0.000011320216,0.003656278],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997159,0.00084531103,0.00007117923,0.0001707286,0.0009958559,0.0007578981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98573977,0.005379626,0.002490083,0.0004730986,0.0038766358,0.0020407136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021389206,0.00017168134,0.00024190464,0.0034376807,0.01551033,0.009448006,0.001053039,0.001254809,0.003710604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012526917,0.00039122772,0.00013260852,0.0048965057,0.0060681654,0.002806026,0.0026119244,0.0014815093,0.00040578205],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006344559,0.0001568261,0.14411521,0.00014171869,0.00001600331,0.002026399,0.79782873,0.00009287192,0.001303017,0.009106971,0.011943657,0.033205155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043409773,0.000014228806,0.1499189,0.00011904492,0.000011345233,0.00026865976,0.8145318,0.00022091214,0.00030392373,0.00026344933,0.03431631,0.000027069831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9324455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9760944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067554474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041295618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033533826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29962206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125781662","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4564","title":"Learning to Act Like a Lawyer: A Model Code of Professional Responsibility for Law Students","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Law; Legal education; Legal profession; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Ethical code; Practice of law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.09656630499813047,"score_gpt":0.4906529854882204,"score_spread":0.39408668049008994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125781662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35868776,0.00063651975,0.032644402,0.138983,0.0006303574,0.0004943261,0.000063419626,0.00019065058,0.46766952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95075744,0.00040735852,0.013728756,0.0047810636,0.00010187508,0.0002495203,0.000025878431,0.000055864,0.029892255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924901,0.004300161,0.00013556314,0.00049181626,0.0013090633,0.0012732737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923734,0.0018244792,0.00057974586,0.00044320282,0.0010401965,0.0037389267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005229117,0.00040221118,0.0002803061,0.0011946436,0.012481727,0.0143004935,0.0026457063,0.0061125956,0.0059834626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077713393,0.00038820133,0.00068699947,0.0008114502,0.022300104,0.0073854523,0.00880931,0.0065705646,0.0011272723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057013745,0.0010436482,0.008806086,0.00006830853,0.000005377428,0.0005107392,0.09989601,0.001672731,0.00046417554,0.8470868,0.015250127,0.025138952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026145036,0.000922972,0.010424964,0.00052537373,0.000045046258,0.0011414624,0.20063673,0.029315805,0.0010623363,0.4758306,0.2796022,0.00023111166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055889364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077878825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055889364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018125383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031361796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13150948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125856224","doi":"","title":"`Neutrality`, `Choice`, and `Ownership` in the Construction, Use, and Adaptation of Judicial Decision Support Systems","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Political science; Politics; Value (mathematics); Judicial discretion; Judicial opinion; Law; Adaptation (eye); Law and economics; Sociology; Judicial review; Psychology","score_opus":0.06906622488836907,"score_gpt":0.26982664449267113,"score_spread":0.20076041960430208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125856224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7915424,0.0015786218,0.07912053,0.01881493,0.00012798299,0.00022326696,0.0000541987,0.00011313238,0.10842495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99662894,0.00013484026,0.0023285158,0.00019429295,0.000020835916,0.000029904593,0.000006286135,0.0000075809207,0.000648776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.87984824,0.08712875,0.004313495,0.004667291,0.019164762,0.004877307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86796683,0.08915835,0.012102616,0.017145539,0.010790194,0.0028364277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08463576,0.00031268678,0.00043906856,0.002528873,0.004317493,0.016954882,0.0019538556,0.0019121198,0.0023209553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.117304765,0.00066891714,0.0005528498,0.0017721765,0.037050884,0.014507608,0.00849211,0.0034619148,0.00028460883],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012467665,0.00013359229,0.03118451,0.00020743221,0.000049477774,0.00016719417,0.064478934,0.002082942,0.0013847097,0.8041368,0.00060990796,0.09543975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019668575,0.0011848307,0.05050303,0.0012586406,0.00014040206,0.00090547005,0.08902103,0.016835947,0.007906777,0.73237795,0.099266,0.0004032498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005389468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004026605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08463576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073003066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007063594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44760203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125885760","doi":"10.37419/lr.v3.i3.4","title":"Addressing Access to Justice Through New Legal Service Providers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Legal service; Economic Justice; Bridging (networking); Service provider; Political science; Legal advice; Public relations; Legal research; Service (business); Business; Law; Public administration; Computer security","score_opus":0.32419587690783136,"score_gpt":0.5099527972806137,"score_spread":0.18575692037278235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125885760","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28890067,0.0041793818,0.007825415,0.3905388,0.0012049574,0.00033647718,0.00026949716,0.00019913058,0.3065457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90609163,0.004083564,0.0057004984,0.03109532,0.0010597673,0.00021858775,0.0001609751,0.00007883055,0.051510822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99289787,0.0022856356,0.000120038014,0.0005219472,0.0015530207,0.0026214672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792545,0.005190959,0.002058059,0.0009842818,0.00230235,0.010209911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063755214,0.00017715683,0.00024024512,0.001325584,0.0060084634,0.0060576545,0.0017796532,0.0031846988,0.03602024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020830559,0.00038387487,0.00043088867,0.0011552937,0.0045150663,0.00871299,0.008447799,0.0066716517,0.0015524337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011955775,0.0015508936,0.046476677,0.0003410245,0.000044778353,0.0012767959,0.04368986,0.0007477585,0.0023629097,0.4248021,0.13860106,0.33998656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023353328,0.0005591183,0.057290535,0.0012650355,0.00005667017,0.0011768627,0.039291624,0.003938436,0.00083091285,0.06777477,0.82747036,0.00011217988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06120234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1787838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06120234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010204994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034188613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12169224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125914650","doi":"10.29173/alr2592","title":"Charity Law Reform in Canada: Moving from Patchwork to Substantive Reform","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia; Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"Law reform; Politics; Law; Legislature; Political law; Political science; Modernization theory; Public law; Comparative law; Reform Act; Public administration; Sociology; Private law; Chinese law","score_opus":0.05728882419979675,"score_gpt":0.33818284341022037,"score_spread":0.2808940192104236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125914650","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06699785,0.07443378,0.005216076,0.62814116,0.0032613054,0.0003212071,0.00069677795,0.00029097596,0.22064081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82325315,0.04099673,0.005488136,0.08944733,0.00085901306,0.00017714222,0.0003995709,0.000196369,0.039182574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674622,0.004042863,0.00069333374,0.0027626648,0.014661752,0.010377185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594393,0.008946048,0.0014741173,0.001724881,0.021063603,0.007352025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020140396,0.0004602449,0.0012655599,0.007331897,0.031394202,0.023392651,0.004015027,0.0070883054,0.008566759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038680978,0.0008886593,0.00092377764,0.011285345,0.03204444,0.0060393843,0.00834361,0.012648837,0.0004742949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064402644,0.000086497756,0.0047023445,0.0006184738,0.00005765109,0.00038174485,0.01599815,0.0017413175,0.00037762657,0.7795301,0.09353441,0.102907255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109383145,0.00008647913,0.0317598,0.002342302,0.00010907732,0.00013539103,0.025086306,0.0014675248,0.0006891519,0.055016235,0.88299996,0.00019847762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99432904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99622655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45831573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.45831573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.65459955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62827694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125929373","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Finding commentary on cases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10845710168873976,"score_gpt":0.38751753341321177,"score_spread":0.27906043172447204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125929373","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00145621,0.024448024,0.0005426539,0.6270801,0.014586641,0.00027904141,0.002567603,0.00027260862,0.32876712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02866508,0.022663763,0.0022656869,0.40038207,0.0067882407,0.0004956626,0.0018217966,0.0006886502,0.5362291],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722457,0.0031639175,0.001531829,0.0013130009,0.01683665,0.0049088094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9241357,0.03534815,0.0018134083,0.0012695545,0.03036742,0.007065714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017676005,0.001203145,0.0010832543,0.01359698,0.03031612,0.020713216,0.0070226537,0.043290514,0.06953881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10138404,0.0012355202,0.0010540863,0.017279817,0.012523355,0.006657402,0.006560852,0.013979235,0.011825874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067944807,0.000004628919,0.000074028954,0.00011084885,0.000002427545,0.000068470814,0.0006565812,0.000017185062,0.000021369908,0.010862594,0.98314244,0.0050325887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009195444,0.0000023865812,0.0005289259,0.00058556645,0.000014455445,0.000028427174,0.0022157524,0.000040972624,0.000060845017,0.0021178878,0.99437153,0.000024083185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94930947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97729504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10108343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10108343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3235238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.733415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125990778","doi":"","title":"Constructing Conflict: A Discursive Analysis of Family Law Conflict","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Problematization; Context (archaeology); Family law; Work (physics); Sociology; Political science; Conflict theories; Law and economics; Law; Public relations; Conflict resolution; Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.07049626092545204,"score_gpt":0.39255364843707385,"score_spread":0.32205738751162183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125990778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42787433,0.0034365945,0.29391807,0.021618845,0.000383763,0.0012636563,0.0004124822,0.00021433392,0.2508779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649159,0.0005857666,0.02956138,0.0005019457,0.00006121935,0.00037596474,0.000114995346,0.00009276583,0.0037901448],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97731155,0.017757125,0.0006228218,0.00097349007,0.0024091157,0.00092596497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675327,0.025735397,0.0022909695,0.0018217519,0.0019329161,0.0006861949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018011022,0.00081562396,0.0008337426,0.009389303,0.014284176,0.01389201,0.004444401,0.003105363,0.0034994904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038317773,0.0006369505,0.00068638107,0.0060387324,0.046477087,0.017392786,0.009648368,0.0046748263,0.00031321845],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022129203,0.000029870936,0.0017196891,0.000100594014,0.000009720674,0.00043040307,0.6646019,0.00028453983,0.0002832984,0.32310295,0.0008897961,0.008525119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020571775,0.000029350891,0.0027731997,0.00036347992,0.00001844837,0.00074042106,0.64801246,0.0033401353,0.00081633544,0.29830873,0.045530964,0.00004586759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01132102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007239625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018011022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009057352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058586416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095252514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126056042","doi":"","title":"Teaching Sexual Assault: The Education of Canadian Law Students","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Medical emergency; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine","score_opus":0.04057738844178617,"score_gpt":0.3881560732252747,"score_spread":0.3475786847834885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126056042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75131387,0.009974984,0.00040875594,0.15394999,0.002685527,0.00045511132,0.00027579765,0.00006943905,0.08086652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93249434,0.010876373,0.00087717135,0.0130224805,0.00029383102,0.00014065411,0.00021480229,0.000039476265,0.042040892],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99284464,0.0010137116,0.000114539514,0.0002980265,0.001995494,0.0037335386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97581893,0.0011940035,0.000951232,0.00013065545,0.0033750082,0.018530231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004884365,0.0007745717,0.0005264294,0.0021203787,0.038703468,0.0076329582,0.0038321067,0.005124142,0.015430078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013223233,0.0010214812,0.00058117864,0.0035652677,0.006424141,0.002243536,0.0053678616,0.0074546784,0.00086718204],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023901057,0.0033028265,0.09732562,0.00089463516,0.000043483287,0.0028976393,0.44480693,0.0006638252,0.0022827906,0.011726325,0.1944549,0.24136199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011636438,0.0005922442,0.13321923,0.0014096949,0.000053655775,0.0008564006,0.5317724,0.00042311577,0.0008502986,0.0017579171,0.32877186,0.00017685302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9787749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99405426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88112956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11887044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.338794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86246943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126058938","doi":"","title":"Mitigating the Protective-Services Orientation in Criminal Justice: An Opening Salvo at the University of Winnipeg","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Orientation (vector space); Criminology; Business; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04679002257318933,"score_gpt":0.320482430511192,"score_spread":0.2736924079380027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126058938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63188756,0.0048102876,0.003119624,0.32344574,0.001495594,0.0011800354,0.00011392961,0.000059225298,0.033888035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94470465,0.0026803026,0.0061231917,0.01976432,0.00020153195,0.0003320348,0.000042622487,0.00006609172,0.026085159],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921862,0.0035485933,0.000076184544,0.0003363578,0.00072475086,0.0031279123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931544,0.0010009336,0.00014340495,0.00017901223,0.00074319396,0.004779128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009401014,0.00052953727,0.00051924423,0.00064125715,0.020309808,0.0074029895,0.0032144564,0.004547504,0.0036864183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010400194,0.00053356495,0.0005990909,0.0004949032,0.004958143,0.0020430058,0.010382086,0.004829726,0.00020004646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013592949,0.0038104162,0.080351084,0.0011239232,0.0003524299,0.0074405023,0.16348937,0.0055434825,0.013030448,0.16710123,0.15112643,0.40527144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006086657,0.0022236493,0.14863056,0.0013309901,0.00040798503,0.00089844747,0.3857863,0.004597014,0.0058118487,0.02445016,0.4249535,0.0003009587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6044046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8809199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39559537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019267602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1290117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7958502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126410174","doi":"","title":"Ontario Civil Justice Reform in the Wake of COVID-19: Inspired or Institutionalized?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Democracy; Law; Political science; Civil procedure; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.09235470747411763,"score_gpt":0.36964443506326455,"score_spread":0.27728972758914694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126410174","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07557016,0.007949116,0.00047298602,0.7541941,0.0014468534,0.00015212284,0.0003197705,0.00008184793,0.15981315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8148341,0.0063844733,0.00091697456,0.10290486,0.00069962785,0.00012600252,0.000194496,0.000061407896,0.073877975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98554844,0.0019362987,0.00021528159,0.00067383185,0.0035013754,0.008124848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886839,0.0008496979,0.0007400045,0.00041899708,0.0024974297,0.006809883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056274785,0.00028512703,0.0004638647,0.0010455078,0.0294209,0.015643084,0.0027549227,0.007831238,0.009338189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01511763,0.00045867322,0.0005135432,0.001933278,0.022255115,0.0044074655,0.006869625,0.007847742,0.0007238649],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015934536,0.00018122216,0.014327833,0.0006158172,0.00007423949,0.0018482227,0.062799126,0.0009822308,0.0012023312,0.47840467,0.3791571,0.060247786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009161597,0.00006625474,0.04709431,0.00046310356,0.000046721154,0.0001314084,0.048349805,0.0004346234,0.0003985912,0.016972857,0.885831,0.00011961927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97953004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6975722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.30242783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46021453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80908483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127285983","doi":"10.46991/afa/2011.7.2.106","title":"Logic Puzzles as Mental Gymnastics for LSAT Preparation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Armenian Folia Anglistika","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Critical thinking; Logical reasoning; Mathematics education; Deductive reasoning; Psychology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.1291871375935426,"score_gpt":0.4219695145891717,"score_spread":0.2927823769956291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127285983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41125453,0.0036211782,0.1589735,0.0093219,0.0018557288,0.0045332485,0.0007037355,0.0042559193,0.40548024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57827497,0.0021975313,0.33545047,0.0010759477,0.000177398,0.002029651,0.0007156773,0.0003916662,0.079686716],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884415,0.00054447073,0.00006693563,0.00014574676,0.00026624842,0.00013242733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892896,0.00037413344,0.000120810924,0.0001283296,0.00010570621,0.00034197132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009896958,0.00082845165,0.00038923632,0.0013559742,0.0012065833,0.0026346191,0.0013242,0.0008737368,0.020641029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00445124,0.00026476794,0.0003667315,0.000726211,0.0013899939,0.0012365739,0.003074693,0.0013939887,0.0047706696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004807948,0.00442145,0.0074189836,0.001357405,0.000023839062,0.00093236077,0.014528429,0.0023328767,0.015397529,0.05444469,0.034592748,0.86406887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005387993,0.0037312033,0.06382025,0.002251107,0.00011594278,0.0030025025,0.026523659,0.016580967,0.014323359,0.06537569,0.80347544,0.00026115403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010181982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005234591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020641029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011016594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020737043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06905115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127792742","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3581","title":"Understanding the Ongoing Dialogues on Indigenous Issues in Canadian Legal Education Through the Lens of Institutional Cultures (Case Studies at UQAM, UAlberta, and UMoncton)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Haute école Spécialisée de Suisse Occidentale; Canadian Armed Forces; University of Alberta; Fermilab; McGill University; Université de Moncton; Université du Québec à Montréal; Foundation for Research, Science and Technology","keywords":"Indigenous; Institution; Curriculum; Diversity (politics); Modalities; Legal education; Sociology; Political science; Law; Space (punctuation); Jurisprudence; Social science","score_opus":0.16371853865627015,"score_gpt":0.4077484529717164,"score_spread":0.24402991431544627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127792742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.906063,0.0027252617,0.001413525,0.011308232,0.00009039379,0.00010518976,0.000068075395,0.000030169202,0.07819605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947101,0.00083706796,0.0004359035,0.00055509363,0.0000075090975,0.00001922857,0.000011419745,0.000009928954,0.0034139003],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902553,0.003793432,0.00019915875,0.0005101637,0.0016333852,0.0036084976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99184954,0.004321092,0.0005719206,0.00030592887,0.0014154477,0.0015361405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00831826,0.00047901453,0.00047842038,0.0032097937,0.056192126,0.013109292,0.0027930017,0.0023402572,0.0033414012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011097742,0.00042454552,0.0003477076,0.004672244,0.037700474,0.004047474,0.009766415,0.0036437598,0.00013384459],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010377179,0.000013448433,0.0034703172,0.0000467959,0.0000045488364,0.00069295696,0.9733638,0.0000959589,0.0003053758,0.01452194,0.0006858995,0.006788632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012952289,0.000005425381,0.0034337752,0.000084262305,0.000006916566,0.0000949409,0.9807478,0.000060158825,0.000148181,0.00073494687,0.014668515,0.000013632762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98014694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99098337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86076653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13923346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13313842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128395170","doi":"","title":"Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Tort; Legal profession; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.039612352586642766,"score_gpt":0.32091734972708147,"score_spread":0.2813049971404387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128395170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013627099,0.019748082,0.0011350382,0.17371577,0.0012066632,0.00008449916,0.0004420221,0.00011708889,0.7899238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41021654,0.026267793,0.0027430141,0.04256995,0.0004207251,0.00009378312,0.00044053613,0.00011222293,0.51713544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946195,0.0003931024,0.000101100326,0.00033048444,0.0026353544,0.0019203072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960562,0.0008896846,0.00015297878,0.00010089396,0.0018764315,0.00092381984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019090589,0.00038533576,0.00048551412,0.002032038,0.030066654,0.015463727,0.0019352278,0.0049452,0.016124511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006880945,0.0005026095,0.0004472455,0.004424873,0.016619826,0.0038025647,0.0039215623,0.0070419926,0.0011748256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008115402,0.000016296046,0.00079534546,0.00005662965,0.0000051711413,0.00015899698,0.004615377,0.0003271279,0.000064154134,0.85408485,0.11768455,0.02218332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012241521,0.000009376587,0.0034284461,0.00033472874,0.000014154268,0.00007482895,0.0070048636,0.0008584523,0.00011280522,0.058814686,0.92929476,0.000040649244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99435705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22914839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22914839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37922668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8940786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130799523","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Making Federal Legislation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0795088310169272,"score_gpt":0.3736711354362158,"score_spread":0.2941623044192886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130799523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012564096,0.0038574855,0.0011105316,0.09587996,0.003987838,0.0005955806,0.01255846,0.0013659134,0.87938774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00388435,0.0017574977,0.0017090781,0.020643067,0.0002769908,0.0002136591,0.0021038062,0.00033428392,0.9690773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98516244,0.0006561159,0.00048325647,0.00052414887,0.010384471,0.0027895526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97743726,0.0022614598,0.00029733215,0.00062117266,0.01691709,0.0024655603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008675276,0.0015314594,0.0010391141,0.0076095234,0.021415636,0.01564592,0.0050190873,0.025268262,0.16815397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029406132,0.0020199125,0.001472965,0.008361755,0.0049469904,0.0059296694,0.004203655,0.011470803,0.051364813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056200142,0.000017860455,0.0000780254,0.00003856835,0.0000014042881,0.000021750426,0.00015022357,0.00004753204,0.00003814593,0.021269098,0.972113,0.0062187877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087775725,0.0000032570351,0.0010136409,0.00014341217,0.000006232737,0.000009851495,0.00031614455,0.00009009397,0.0001009689,0.0022052007,0.996071,0.000031417156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98822635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99268556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16815397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12112702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41729295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8788421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131305194","doi":"","title":"AI and Legal Ethics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Mandate; Legal profession; Political science; Legal research; Law; Professional conduct; Professional responsibility; Practice of law; Legal service; Engineering ethics; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.05170080300963048,"score_gpt":0.4005841194015922,"score_spread":0.34888331639196174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131305194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008471876,0.044452876,0.025286244,0.26494092,0.001536314,0.00009060956,0.00007127038,0.00007552841,0.6550744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7792866,0.040738773,0.026817558,0.070535466,0.004812537,0.0003963787,0.00011094987,0.00013018248,0.077171646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858043,0.00943276,0.00043692492,0.0009124614,0.0025025106,0.00091103616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987992,0.008605641,0.00062164693,0.00079261,0.001174824,0.00081327325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010859722,0.0005034399,0.00061986764,0.0015511372,0.0074070725,0.009659477,0.0010485871,0.0082300985,0.0053728814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011857707,0.00027340453,0.00036772853,0.00123161,0.054712437,0.0064886473,0.0039340933,0.007670156,0.0014492307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021514002,0.000008882007,0.000101987884,0.000030278372,0.0000026473833,0.000033668584,0.0014951734,0.00012768147,0.00003138311,0.9892202,0.004720248,0.004225646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005351479,0.00000916475,0.00015418715,0.00019817177,0.0000017178883,0.00007506903,0.0011142645,0.00019963825,0.000032696702,0.8774695,0.12073325,0.0000070376473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056870123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040816218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010859722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00795485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010268554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057716727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131963496","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Session Laws Library: Browsing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0713582634306228,"score_gpt":0.37863052953250276,"score_spread":0.30727226610187997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131963496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019873261,0.00030092587,0.00020806532,0.0010542733,0.00035608665,0.000059513954,0.0071369456,0.0030182002,0.9876673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001341996,0.00028575186,0.00015069902,0.000581512,0.00011308944,0.000070702845,0.003279542,0.0007825685,0.9933942],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994961,0.000068135974,0.000025368672,0.000050497114,0.00026165188,0.0000982557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884295,0.00017665805,0.00004646627,0.00012203755,0.00049786706,0.0003141004],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006401516,0.000653685,0.0006145742,0.0021821586,0.0030948103,0.0057319724,0.0011210274,0.0026482756,0.83520263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028353028,0.00049904437,0.00041917313,0.0031440102,0.00075880776,0.0038445357,0.0027853067,0.0018140596,0.72588885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058678515,0.000011958173,0.000043177275,0.000031209747,4.6707586e-7,0.000012215514,0.000021892867,0.000010820364,0.000025135485,0.0014367796,0.98406607,0.014334422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003670614,0.0000043201844,0.00020086605,0.000045755063,5.87231e-7,0.000011870728,0.00003336074,0.000023652066,0.0000490085,0.0003486129,0.9992741,0.0000043369937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036175456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08154073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83520263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002528142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040097027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23506343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132002735","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Finding judicial consideration of legislative provisions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislature; Political science","score_opus":0.09699600949113332,"score_gpt":0.38369219347066497,"score_spread":0.28669618397953167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132002735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004770209,0.0056822128,0.0017289565,0.048300754,0.001619266,0.0006926892,0.015805298,0.0012759607,0.92012453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023972793,0.004830178,0.0041763177,0.019572722,0.00030052973,0.00038394827,0.00622093,0.00068018824,0.9398625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98475546,0.0009710588,0.0006633882,0.00063547725,0.010282138,0.0026924356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671844,0.0070363386,0.0005998718,0.000721369,0.022065999,0.0023920776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008169958,0.0010465159,0.00062807754,0.011963364,0.02160501,0.0140825175,0.0043510245,0.01138274,0.12601629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043714296,0.0012992834,0.00074270286,0.016497921,0.0048993463,0.0048967567,0.003236917,0.0043579503,0.024008796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013129906,0.00002100215,0.00045625557,0.00013106794,0.0000025210354,0.00006467687,0.0009882731,0.000073428266,0.00008104332,0.020956956,0.9557055,0.021506125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011544247,0.0000059993263,0.003564693,0.0003300497,0.000014653599,0.000030453673,0.0024650625,0.00014917605,0.00025672518,0.0022666825,0.9908681,0.000036888956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92297137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07702865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3437538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55888456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134487719","doi":"","title":"Building Self-Advocacy Skills of Legal Services Clients: Three Principles for Promoting an Innovation in Practice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Innovations Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Legal service; Action (physics); Work (physics); Practice of law; Business; Affect (linguistics); Service (business); Engineering ethics; Political science; Legal profession; Law; Sociology; Marketing; Engineering","score_opus":0.05195578566712274,"score_gpt":0.4309940339017474,"score_spread":0.3790382482346247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134487719","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039049648,0.0026989668,0.15175542,0.56204385,0.0012098554,0.0036918973,0.00005924098,0.0007310462,0.23876005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62011784,0.0023480966,0.30708215,0.047400966,0.0006786949,0.0068906997,0.00006350195,0.00020903323,0.015209021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9159671,0.046649896,0.0043743723,0.0038217702,0.023556266,0.0056305835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8179345,0.09868668,0.013249046,0.01859011,0.024880942,0.026658678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10867023,0.0013630613,0.001206846,0.005839454,0.01597667,0.023889696,0.0048139975,0.018437034,0.002510705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07985482,0.0017940003,0.0019836267,0.0014052123,0.0865816,0.018991474,0.02927577,0.021072691,0.0020535365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075526856,0.0014699562,0.009406043,0.0010341681,0.00008109962,0.0004605626,0.12534897,0.0005459925,0.0016602479,0.721128,0.023961939,0.11482746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028037291,0.0005389735,0.0073347837,0.0029842653,0.00008354072,0.00083708874,0.036265463,0.0013984669,0.0029778176,0.7705762,0.17649224,0.00023083102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039928905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048765996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10867023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009353049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06670756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57470995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134739799","doi":"","title":"Billing Without Bilking: Regulating Time-Based Legal Fees","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Distrust; Law; Obligation; Professional conduct; Legal ethics; Flexibility (engineering); Practice of law; Professional responsibility; Legal certainty; Legal profession; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.04381351952268743,"score_gpt":0.3285869188497427,"score_spread":0.2847733993270553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134739799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13569188,0.0034256466,0.14291225,0.019753646,0.00095118745,0.0010894223,0.00059427705,0.0016809049,0.6939007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85287064,0.0014665774,0.053273562,0.0042086644,0.00022900176,0.00028977566,0.00024349391,0.00038271624,0.08703556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98399043,0.0014807035,0.00049193227,0.0010327665,0.01073853,0.0022655963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889788,0.0021360116,0.0008498979,0.0011449296,0.006026012,0.00086435274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057156975,0.0004404845,0.00030584072,0.003096619,0.0054987655,0.011833043,0.0025919618,0.0019847106,0.005527983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02238583,0.00038889123,0.0005079957,0.0023188572,0.006091973,0.0038773096,0.003344126,0.0028376982,0.0013767396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008795597,0.000103341175,0.0094594015,0.00012349107,0.000020165866,0.00023652233,0.003758232,0.0047835773,0.003503203,0.8212752,0.03240853,0.124240346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115159615,0.0002901857,0.04328787,0.00089773297,0.00015569525,0.0006641169,0.005491263,0.046565462,0.016694142,0.16424592,0.72105896,0.00053349044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6864166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7519178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6864166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041112248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054579295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6308602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134897786","doi":"","title":"Trans Competent Lawyering","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal advice; Legal profession; Law; Criminalization; Family law; Racialization; Legal research; Practice of law; Professional responsibility; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017928810283497874,"score_gpt":0.33058371564178796,"score_spread":0.3126549053582901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134897786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03370435,0.00930064,0.011835054,0.110529706,0.008544186,0.000681361,0.00036821686,0.0010202074,0.82401633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12725438,0.00787328,0.015442786,0.0763998,0.00094507704,0.00022566781,0.00042225764,0.00036122123,0.77107555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952678,0.00073617644,0.00020022108,0.00050383597,0.0015125535,0.0017792168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906336,0.0006199784,0.00034213817,0.0004491321,0.0024515993,0.0055036265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003984234,0.0004952481,0.00045294472,0.0012786504,0.013912313,0.0052642645,0.0025892179,0.004479213,0.20083915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010241823,0.0005369751,0.0005748667,0.0008831868,0.002929452,0.0060485024,0.0096655,0.00859322,0.03161986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030201014,0.00048794755,0.0026743975,0.00030706424,0.00000877732,0.0029196134,0.02555366,0.00015024863,0.0017709854,0.056950938,0.748424,0.16072203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009598771,0.000053304717,0.0015061225,0.0002457324,0.0000033434487,0.0016041631,0.01776258,0.00011333562,0.00015410072,0.0045740646,0.97395647,0.000017100288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05422857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22783408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20083915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008590544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028033787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67187387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135352614","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-67977-4_4","title":"Power on the Margins: Navigating the Program Director Role as an Asian, Queer, Immigrant Woman in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SpringerBriefs in family therapy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Queer; Identity (music); Gender studies; Power (physics); Sociology; Immigration; Institution; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Social science; History","score_opus":0.031351552343417785,"score_gpt":0.32626502969700943,"score_spread":0.29491347735359164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135352614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4532664,0.009052304,0.001209976,0.16364878,0.0020012662,0.00018008759,0.00015162125,0.000100042795,0.37038952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76238436,0.0052353498,0.0008893848,0.018216686,0.00011235289,0.000087342116,0.000058911814,0.00017501615,0.21284065],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970667,0.00067888125,0.000024390883,0.00014461068,0.00041185104,0.0016736278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711597,0.00046753243,0.00009389162,0.000026955024,0.00037152215,0.0019240836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018636244,0.0003987052,0.00046230693,0.0008257539,0.063157156,0.010805174,0.002962885,0.0044197626,0.010754337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004026144,0.00039840292,0.00033934886,0.0017953876,0.013566335,0.0038358183,0.0064209406,0.01004874,0.00078390626],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003854662,0.00009134724,0.0036428135,0.000056902187,0.000006209776,0.0025704734,0.8232956,0.00013619126,0.00034302604,0.0644457,0.074952655,0.030420594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006194062,0.000017819013,0.0021385949,0.00015045142,0.000007742356,0.00035264523,0.8428309,0.00009535488,0.00009476897,0.0015521831,0.15272985,0.000023456181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9683511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064416714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064416714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18811609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46737814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135356935","doi":"","title":"Using the Web to Facilitate Active Learning: A Transpacific Seminar on Globalization and Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Thursday; Class (philosophy); The Internet; Point (geometry); Media studies; Law; Sociology; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.061414572054821315,"score_gpt":0.35956477328779307,"score_spread":0.29815020123297176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135356935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11170346,0.009190701,0.0062524085,0.3549671,0.020482719,0.0005699453,0.00030763433,0.0006048572,0.49592125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44903216,0.0076617254,0.003996397,0.06841118,0.0077053453,0.00091869704,0.0003090406,0.0007837051,0.46118185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775404,0.0012294083,0.00004315125,0.00018203793,0.0002904874,0.0005009112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961218,0.001424116,0.00010434437,0.00020779815,0.00013632246,0.0020055128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005812116,0.00096464914,0.00046629345,0.00071270036,0.008772862,0.010160628,0.0020515167,0.00503755,0.027713928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004442665,0.00031656667,0.00059459585,0.0005843042,0.0074295895,0.008657198,0.008377581,0.009291476,0.005227733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020060627,0.004282146,0.0009323939,0.00044715637,0.000022286695,0.0027835132,0.06901121,0.00038586694,0.0033943814,0.08127302,0.72844476,0.10882262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106136955,0.0002523946,0.0027106318,0.00045645455,0.000007468291,0.00034286632,0.035831522,0.00038669904,0.0010315268,0.02806933,0.9307768,0.000028194016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010834117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033842865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027713928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031904455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036167607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09271234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136266764","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3426794","title":"Students Fostering Legal Literacy: A Professor’s Perspective about the Canadian Journal of Law and Justice (Foreword)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Law; Literacy; Sociology; Political science; Legal research; Computer science","score_opus":0.02587451135063277,"score_gpt":0.39345818753305317,"score_spread":0.3675836761824204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136266764","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015266581,0.013526254,0.00008713734,0.9371862,0.016450746,0.000028803986,0.00004720041,0.000020777105,0.031126276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12239875,0.032329183,0.00068251486,0.69858485,0.029653454,0.00015551799,0.00009066604,0.00012121899,0.11598386],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990092,0.0015961011,0.00036246824,0.0007596544,0.0036258267,0.0035639633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97471285,0.006646894,0.0007407092,0.00017753757,0.008344366,0.009377503],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008619719,0.0006553874,0.001342461,0.0029759551,0.038470514,0.02922842,0.0043557496,0.030622436,0.017781299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023449665,0.00068687706,0.0007046507,0.0043599578,0.021821192,0.009444369,0.0055140206,0.02968069,0.0020089343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013353225,0.00006224658,0.00075100444,0.00015780372,0.0000076080764,0.00022866452,0.0149513185,0.00005622121,0.00012180388,0.13307598,0.835876,0.014698035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016693819,0.000025383277,0.0041020704,0.0007080972,0.000021464006,0.00013075373,0.025714854,0.0000766687,0.00011349782,0.013151233,0.9558726,0.000066642315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8848046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95619804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97077155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.081766196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22055086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.593258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138280092","doi":"","title":"Transnational Law as Socio-Legal Theory: The Challenges for “Law in Context” in a Divided World","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Tribute; Comparative law; Law; Political science; Capitalism; Context (archaeology); Legal profession; Law and development; Sociology; Legal history; Empirical legal studies; Development studies; Geography","score_opus":0.028293761941167,"score_gpt":0.3476559591177631,"score_spread":0.3193621971765961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138280092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10723055,0.02204125,0.027592024,0.27705365,0.0011258767,0.000057221958,0.000090115886,0.00007206336,0.56473714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98792577,0.0025908449,0.0019923889,0.0030681614,0.00021642433,0.000049432587,0.000018960627,0.00003695321,0.004101036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942947,0.0042250887,0.00010175649,0.0005163126,0.00043899022,0.0004231492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471277,0.0034473,0.00035780654,0.0006032653,0.00032716428,0.0005516742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007893284,0.00039942036,0.0006119894,0.0024708854,0.011676693,0.021758167,0.0017425624,0.0040351674,0.0063748113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069414317,0.00029007567,0.00037126843,0.0028191616,0.08399301,0.027275212,0.012128422,0.0074019628,0.00043968638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002377708,0.0000044666717,0.0001217642,0.000013436659,0.0000011396016,0.00003337297,0.016878884,0.00004455893,0.000015963155,0.9799382,0.0007062184,0.0022395384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004351262,0.000011363168,0.00045007674,0.00021844097,0.0000040779605,0.00007169774,0.07005791,0.0004562556,0.000063692896,0.8686647,0.05998899,0.000008400621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00772245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010933353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021758167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010229243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066049094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07421869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138893990","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Grade 11: Understanding Canadian Law: Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Everyday life; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10476552600024275,"score_gpt":0.3645932363131734,"score_spread":0.25982771031293067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138893990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021489006,0.0063502514,0.0010056366,0.06169634,0.0013292506,0.00027162096,0.0037925234,0.00018963373,0.9038759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18154167,0.010518908,0.0043188925,0.007908355,0.0002569276,0.00022857083,0.0022126005,0.00017729348,0.79283684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988368,0.00009132884,0.00002921178,0.0001050979,0.0006767496,0.0002608412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793977,0.0001289554,0.000034903853,0.000029379491,0.0014535564,0.00041354768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012605566,0.00042562728,0.00022889592,0.0026043665,0.015524295,0.0061558387,0.0012654087,0.0022293981,0.047766477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003535725,0.00030129869,0.0002610549,0.0029701625,0.002888607,0.0020866692,0.0020267265,0.003111936,0.003710454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001801768,0.000057188685,0.005073856,0.0002678444,0.0000033378597,0.00023877982,0.023813296,0.00026750602,0.00028086375,0.14149004,0.735579,0.0929101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002619962,0.000007980049,0.00785405,0.00036584912,0.0000039354527,0.00005418702,0.014015219,0.000084085135,0.00016512159,0.003914792,0.97351086,0.00002138568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98911834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08316035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08316035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1250187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6033734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139249903","doi":"","title":"A Snapshot of the Law in the Streets: Reflections of a Former Parkdale Academic Director","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Experiential learning; Snapshot (computer storage); Sociology; Law; Reflection (computer programming); Context (archaeology); Political science; History","score_opus":0.0613625735406758,"score_gpt":0.3969125977249414,"score_spread":0.3355500241842656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139249903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70328695,0.0037761522,0.003031937,0.2025895,0.0022166169,0.00012652669,0.00014740379,0.00017410019,0.08465079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409574,0.00224204,0.0014320681,0.022414332,0.00051492936,0.00006721102,0.000050063252,0.00022962122,0.032092303],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868047,0.009593447,0.00018947286,0.0006986939,0.0010253312,0.0016883072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99105,0.0041477373,0.0006427563,0.00029821813,0.0008166358,0.0030445834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00564334,0.00063280325,0.000971075,0.0019999375,0.04751587,0.015984768,0.0028450964,0.007887778,0.0065408386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012482903,0.0012565503,0.000508127,0.0018795746,0.025020244,0.009718384,0.0149833625,0.021242758,0.0012306883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018716191,0.00010231288,0.0009498555,0.000039915343,0.000004484066,0.0032384263,0.96640176,0.000048223792,0.00039864713,0.006908152,0.01808377,0.003805607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002492917,0.000028310737,0.00037903668,0.000053020958,0.0000023916464,0.00037726722,0.93637615,0.00003988572,0.0001497268,0.00052236795,0.062058736,0.000010675118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01788837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052493993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04751587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075861714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006231049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05504173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139419245","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.vi0.188989","title":"Sessional Contract Faculty, Unionization, and Academic Freedom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; McMaster University","funders":"Brock University","keywords":"Academic freedom; Collective bargaining; Freedom of association; Unit (ring theory); Union density; Political science; Freedom of contract; Law and economics; Labour economics; Law; Higher education; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Mathematics education; Human rights","score_opus":0.056340654337521355,"score_gpt":0.4084957059203853,"score_spread":0.352155051582864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139419245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9145496,0.00045809313,0.0021373935,0.0029658359,0.000031659347,0.000053907035,0.00015179714,0.000030042664,0.07962174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99410844,0.000080286285,0.00013743916,0.000117718926,0.000013357396,0.000012770027,0.000033037024,0.0000041256503,0.005492768],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926674,0.0012053823,0.0002824121,0.00034286478,0.002576275,0.0029256705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818023,0.0040938356,0.005085645,0.00099824,0.0015785649,0.0064415177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004683505,0.000103469494,0.0002541278,0.0012807101,0.0068433853,0.0036747027,0.0010771059,0.000998013,0.015859712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018910488,0.00017770429,0.00031333612,0.0019352924,0.008040022,0.0015502933,0.003752077,0.0013989799,0.0006170233],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005169911,0.0004315231,0.6596272,0.00016553728,0.00007994088,0.00043667448,0.019627603,0.003265005,0.002896123,0.23046659,0.0055792513,0.076907545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050320254,0.00022106226,0.91404134,0.00016194004,0.00003078419,0.00013918948,0.022928005,0.0012821665,0.0009369095,0.02082616,0.039325003,0.00005709285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17033304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37950605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015258097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02314266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3386832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141387742","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500001712","title":"Free Legal Advice on the Internet","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Legal advice; Political science; German; Law; Portuguese; Romanian; Lithuanian; Public relations; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.01893122793269297,"score_gpt":0.33485186602595596,"score_spread":0.315920638093263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141387742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07588633,0.0032655585,0.0049369535,0.033875383,0.0012356901,0.00025487298,0.0015575356,0.0013478629,0.8776398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5881671,0.0038557502,0.01670151,0.0121843135,0.0027158426,0.00039866788,0.0018530322,0.00059621205,0.3735276],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99480927,0.002259606,0.00021603951,0.00023076794,0.0021555596,0.0003287104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977982,0.014946377,0.0012865355,0.0013690738,0.0025241636,0.0018918621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002865365,0.0002624254,0.0004129396,0.0031046164,0.0032793197,0.0029713828,0.0007727716,0.0023763855,0.12253868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020193737,0.00018678166,0.00023027914,0.0021946013,0.001015836,0.0041108057,0.0027438344,0.0014895302,0.023540873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013106258,0.00047589812,0.004041502,0.0004954621,0.000017444472,0.0007469199,0.016195823,0.00030481652,0.0011887897,0.033562344,0.5397807,0.40305924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044273256,0.000080764614,0.00442381,0.0004351825,0.000009780701,0.00023983387,0.005248317,0.0005526544,0.00046545648,0.009487708,0.9789834,0.000028850865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024180214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007407034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12253868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012318181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017929861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40993273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141728951","doi":"","title":"New developments at the University of Ottawa Community Legal Clinic.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Legal service; Family medicine; Library science; Medicine; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10146995134018985,"score_gpt":0.33919369667282817,"score_spread":0.23772374533263832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141728951","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028342376,0.09862881,0.0015019333,0.63151866,0.020043325,0.0002667823,0.0011652199,0.00039166037,0.21814117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30789337,0.10538833,0.013671729,0.09977959,0.007566687,0.00035575204,0.0015778221,0.0003575694,0.46340913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913823,0.0016248528,0.00032194506,0.00060586573,0.003685348,0.0023797187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676733,0.002002945,0.0010448666,0.0007103762,0.009577799,0.018990763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004681523,0.00048195856,0.0002810924,0.002867021,0.014692454,0.008037106,0.002936688,0.0047485903,0.047328427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008768521,0.00051278743,0.00066894264,0.0030653921,0.0066869035,0.004435582,0.003506783,0.0040702964,0.0038742884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011781526,0.0002958602,0.012510997,0.00092168356,0.000024306386,0.0017367132,0.013046014,0.00014985495,0.000826163,0.034149885,0.67276853,0.2634522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001882157,0.000051266277,0.016069595,0.0004101355,0.000017077231,0.0006658394,0.008862561,0.000040808693,0.00013816664,0.0009624199,0.97272027,0.000043047236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88096255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11903745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061938547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14008348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44939768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143406518","doi":"","title":"Book Reviews: International Perspectives on the Regulation of Lawyers and Legal Services by Andrew Boon, Ed","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Legal profession; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Legal service","score_opus":0.012571241296601803,"score_gpt":0.3322306354420002,"score_spread":0.3196593941453984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143406518","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059004856,0.6854035,0.0005346458,0.11091533,0.014049638,0.000017497874,0.000073415395,0.000054295622,0.18836156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019401535,0.62382966,0.00094132725,0.041337892,0.018244194,0.00012315738,0.00018384292,0.00011483965,0.29582357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980464,0.0007284873,0.00007247526,0.00017537684,0.0007739665,0.00020327547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705064,0.0018024774,0.00021527582,0.00007130166,0.00062288385,0.00023740715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018488792,0.0009326062,0.00083692523,0.0028785327,0.0038156067,0.008406711,0.0010430873,0.0032810816,0.014394677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004937191,0.0005281649,0.00043873762,0.0056644483,0.0035497472,0.0055492693,0.0016579799,0.0049530524,0.0049792943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010164174,0.000015590856,0.00008143139,0.00024584404,0.000004034636,0.000037609905,0.0013227916,0.00012198562,0.000049897546,0.06318547,0.90805876,0.026866466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023550804,0.0000048527004,0.00018367467,0.0006452862,0.0000026855778,0.00003114052,0.0005975736,0.000022756483,0.000014966683,0.0065039843,0.9919863,0.0000045257125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012976285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024543582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014394677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060278196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066437274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04815495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145864293","doi":"10.5860/dttp.v49i1.7536","title":"RIGHTS! Civil and Human Rights Law Portal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DttP Documents to the People","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Civil society; International human rights law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.01893893334414727,"score_gpt":0.36397865437969434,"score_spread":0.3450397210355471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145864293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022185524,0.0003667936,0.0009283698,0.0024544178,0.0003847149,0.000117446005,0.009680877,0.004604303,0.98124117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046797404,0.0009047652,0.001855839,0.003301967,0.0004294158,0.0001775721,0.015465878,0.0032826494,0.96990216],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974445,0.0003155635,0.00010891883,0.00014918792,0.001647319,0.0003344927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99411774,0.0008994492,0.000233587,0.0013303632,0.0019414573,0.0014775167],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029702657,0.0006673024,0.00072140293,0.0043357196,0.003242488,0.011551223,0.0012809827,0.0037228402,0.7349658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010332121,0.0006385774,0.0004027374,0.003900067,0.0015770482,0.009638189,0.005434982,0.0028610115,0.626469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007764348,0.00002502178,0.00012819846,0.00007169103,0.0000012197904,0.000045916047,0.00009195308,0.000016351789,0.00013791001,0.014907805,0.9544445,0.030121636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000457921,0.0000024657816,0.00016295661,0.000040166233,5.038377e-7,0.000020985102,0.00005076824,0.000021342687,0.000081708284,0.0016931079,0.9979159,0.0000054521847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018522138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03350386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7349658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004668771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009374036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37803912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148220753","doi":"","title":"The Essence of Snobbery Is a Problem of Belonging: When Public Interest Litigation Is Used as a Cover for Controversy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Public interest; Disadvantaged; Political science; Cover (algebra); Subject (documents); Diversity (politics); Law; Statement (logic); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.04071740326763004,"score_gpt":0.36359249890910533,"score_spread":0.3228750956414753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148220753","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046060473,0.007049943,0.015367583,0.5316798,0.0050731204,0.00007219398,0.000036882433,0.00019230718,0.3944677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8309811,0.0026314105,0.0032662954,0.12433657,0.004573288,0.00014489234,0.000044112865,0.00047810256,0.03354413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.948438,0.027423583,0.001653411,0.0049488973,0.011973775,0.005562333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93876976,0.046193764,0.0038436542,0.0039739357,0.0035872152,0.0036317247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042577248,0.00062741194,0.0013417399,0.0038321323,0.037238,0.03257754,0.0039110584,0.029260907,0.0099505065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1026954,0.0007650608,0.0014302827,0.0027063761,0.096857265,0.04510187,0.022605537,0.031842753,0.0019445145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018242332,0.000026624753,0.0007060882,0.000056329405,0.000013699016,0.00080943794,0.069100074,0.00006931378,0.00012964643,0.8960911,0.02291063,0.010068846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030700994,0.00003886688,0.0007043044,0.00072968565,0.00002729033,0.0011715963,0.08652515,0.00038870718,0.000296202,0.57098,0.33904293,0.000064531894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0093255015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008516367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042577248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011710833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013576409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2251727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148743119","doi":"","title":"Racism in Justice: The Report of the Commission on Systemic Racism in the Ontario Criminal Justice System","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Commission; Criminology; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05167353823640052,"score_gpt":0.30420715435651646,"score_spread":0.25253361612011593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148743119","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04527202,0.091132574,0.00082442735,0.5916013,0.006257729,0.00045853152,0.0027545562,0.00010483796,0.26159394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34538618,0.079177774,0.0021115781,0.04995455,0.0024897323,0.0005363611,0.002838319,0.00019208077,0.51731336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938455,0.0005693311,0.00017415368,0.00023596274,0.0035257854,0.0016491299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99524057,0.0005316761,0.0003169066,0.0001438629,0.002477276,0.0012897565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047331243,0.0006073027,0.00051800517,0.00283928,0.012655091,0.009812369,0.0017427581,0.0075218175,0.004743833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068805935,0.0008662529,0.00045254143,0.0073329383,0.007768321,0.0026693833,0.0036743574,0.0050140843,0.00052325346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020246503,0.000029173543,0.005986705,0.00031834166,0.000013188278,0.00013669838,0.02236677,0.00029559815,0.00014178979,0.036839113,0.8984852,0.035367228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015906231,0.000014286987,0.055311367,0.00067221985,0.00002409103,0.00006903503,0.016886564,0.00015349312,0.00012117596,0.00327275,0.9234069,0.000052292577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98887944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09763154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09763154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3129618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70836973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148978637","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3661685","title":"Linking with Law: Reaching Out to Include Law as a Human Service","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06021864175101786,"score_gpt":0.3989549730933505,"score_spread":0.3387363313423326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148978637","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031030357,0.001637986,0.032100953,0.49936256,0.0023706339,0.00027853396,0.000032021155,0.00032340345,0.43286347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68737525,0.0030480688,0.040401515,0.17133826,0.0012938807,0.0005305328,0.00012193529,0.0005638812,0.095326655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97101825,0.018750997,0.00069322536,0.002247138,0.0035362842,0.0037540442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9476988,0.025829606,0.0023112842,0.0045177843,0.004263398,0.01537916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034584966,0.00057342066,0.00078207004,0.0023056737,0.025361612,0.02602173,0.0034542228,0.02501961,0.045966122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05711084,0.00070982054,0.0009937987,0.002601601,0.034061708,0.04039503,0.026807716,0.023293076,0.009114395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020121684,0.00066969503,0.0033253448,0.00023109073,0.000013441258,0.00047882515,0.070429884,0.00025445304,0.00048647553,0.7212165,0.066999696,0.1358746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020523768,0.00012204864,0.0020309263,0.0012434289,0.00002540765,0.0003013229,0.07529187,0.00056522863,0.00058280205,0.5573941,0.36236578,0.00005651127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004873322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007966814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045966122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071522538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05479548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18290496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150700372","doi":"","title":"The Barrie guide to the law of evidence 2020","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05809992899119372,"score_gpt":0.34044186105565166,"score_spread":0.28234193206445796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150700372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026527073,0.024778273,0.03857912,0.032221824,0.0024736174,0.00089120364,0.0051793675,0.0029052815,0.89270604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055009485,0.023287162,0.0458464,0.015702264,0.0012410363,0.0017646896,0.004613343,0.002069106,0.89997506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99316967,0.00251993,0.00093771785,0.00032654617,0.0026889776,0.00035717958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766261,0.014164276,0.0005646273,0.0013226777,0.0064174403,0.00090483535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007881187,0.001526965,0.0014643798,0.0051539377,0.0024736512,0.010009198,0.0029018496,0.007738529,0.17051458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02971758,0.0040706694,0.0011172545,0.003676278,0.0052549713,0.008229774,0.0036306146,0.009115609,0.1493165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009450003,0.000015505268,0.00006334338,0.000260998,0.0000035854007,0.0001384645,0.00035943757,0.00017896453,0.00009188343,0.06531562,0.87428147,0.059281267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046365667,0.000004702379,0.0000866578,0.0006074723,0.000001560696,0.000114582974,0.00010612008,0.000057752808,0.00003588779,0.014053166,0.98491514,0.000012363613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022915184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05405516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17051458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045567667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020233642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57042813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151452683","doi":"","title":"The Minister’s Office Lawyer: A Challenge to the Role of the Attorney General?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Officer; Politics; Competence (human resources); Power of attorney; Professional conduct; Government (linguistics); Prime minister; Management; Health care","score_opus":0.023490984147953774,"score_gpt":0.3120317577481743,"score_spread":0.28854077360022057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151452683","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010290044,0.014354767,0.0010886393,0.94051546,0.0022075474,0.00000905881,0.0000065908325,0.000022656692,0.031505223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5358428,0.022506665,0.0030237113,0.3814272,0.0076252935,0.000057394234,0.000028971564,0.000121206154,0.049366735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99013245,0.0052145263,0.00024606803,0.0009617452,0.0014884064,0.0019568307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99165946,0.004497402,0.00039528875,0.0003147915,0.00089872157,0.002234352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01309341,0.00029724714,0.0006644846,0.0009520675,0.010991882,0.017797595,0.0024667976,0.0155437365,0.0043862746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016281217,0.0004967092,0.00051614875,0.0010525149,0.018009225,0.013995543,0.0053555407,0.018812047,0.0010142226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025239988,0.000055604145,0.0010361737,0.00007524102,0.000007949867,0.00033716921,0.008017879,0.00009117667,0.000099259065,0.88026106,0.090228096,0.019765174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009959471,0.00009056077,0.003475685,0.0009700693,0.000027729875,0.0007949437,0.035340875,0.0009761316,0.00023904382,0.28000605,0.6778971,0.000082161765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04308271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064682096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04308271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011634787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018207068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085663915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151486463","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: News, Blogs & Keeping up to Date","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Media studies; Internet privacy; Advertising; Computer science; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.07876365324839102,"score_gpt":0.3736533940056668,"score_spread":0.29488974075727575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151486463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061232,0.0031140049,0.00025795237,0.016208354,0.0021906209,0.0001256335,0.010436167,0.0013399078,0.965715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016984014,0.0016919187,0.00024530222,0.001590713,0.00016901374,0.00003420662,0.0018766549,0.00028064422,0.9924131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970483,0.0001282837,0.00008522009,0.00014249091,0.0020488275,0.0005468526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869645,0.0010492448,0.00025949857,0.00044745192,0.008272078,0.0030071316],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020461534,0.0012448877,0.0007299947,0.0063131107,0.010181929,0.014020828,0.0018821544,0.006388663,0.49857974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010729473,0.00069631526,0.0005310878,0.010928866,0.0025308502,0.0047198855,0.002663987,0.0028092097,0.2130747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004608352,0.000008472055,0.00006489946,0.000050501345,6.020006e-7,0.000010290495,0.00006570744,0.000015083913,0.000027410377,0.0027498486,0.97848284,0.018519752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027353694,0.0000029339765,0.0009595491,0.00008584171,0.0000018163124,0.000008310915,0.0002567596,0.00003122429,0.000046189874,0.0004776282,0.99811745,0.000009634214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9164976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9691542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49857974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03304259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.120058164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71521515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151706072","doi":"","title":"Effecting a Culture Shift -- An Empirical Review of Ontario's Summary Judgment Reforms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Aside; Supreme court; Summary judgment; Political science; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Law","score_opus":0.04074323343415881,"score_gpt":0.36006462844406517,"score_spread":0.31932139500990636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151706072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8745065,0.038638793,0.00037708087,0.016456071,0.00018798564,0.00024910012,0.0039430507,0.0000313974,0.06561012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97225654,0.021298185,0.00032999058,0.0013116709,0.0000554466,0.000057608897,0.0008969723,0.000014653755,0.0037789794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.988777,0.0015365933,0.0008842645,0.000611029,0.0066389926,0.0015521568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9242531,0.016862608,0.017177494,0.0019417529,0.0352148,0.0045501958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008079257,0.000156131,0.00046457845,0.0037184567,0.006083297,0.005007682,0.0011983664,0.00064549764,0.002318949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039351072,0.0003056839,0.0003803946,0.014052221,0.0033217096,0.001999575,0.0017392153,0.0009296298,0.00017302897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027360817,0.00014769903,0.56206065,0.005563951,0.00029057785,0.0012284723,0.14896221,0.000916525,0.0016371853,0.018576473,0.041826077,0.21851654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012700051,0.000047041776,0.86181986,0.0011840176,0.000085798834,0.00008438998,0.041724235,0.00012993396,0.00024443422,0.0002213219,0.09440231,0.00004400296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9771453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99089116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09888253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09888253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16242129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7174463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152901294","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3481494","title":"Law and Humanities: A Field Without a Canon","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Field (mathematics); Canon; Digital humanities; Political science; Law; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.017604125924256524,"score_gpt":0.3329253766722241,"score_spread":0.3153212507479676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152901294","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002398403,0.066639796,0.0038736435,0.82934237,0.01507603,0.000032318232,0.000049820625,0.000076284494,0.08251135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33947653,0.07302509,0.012114527,0.4146544,0.05391555,0.00028880325,0.000094220515,0.00038377903,0.106047034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986694,0.007935154,0.0006435445,0.0013046181,0.0025612533,0.00086151453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952897,0.029466406,0.0013132894,0.0033566626,0.0041363635,0.00883027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022923052,0.0012363808,0.0021459402,0.006096036,0.017348737,0.032408524,0.0025237182,0.027662612,0.02575631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020815596,0.00071399607,0.00079997873,0.0041893953,0.09229797,0.05229661,0.017791478,0.028696146,0.0045640683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023082568,0.00007449695,0.00013964329,0.00017321506,0.000005714982,0.00006763691,0.0031249754,0.000039140574,0.00007572822,0.9060968,0.07150136,0.018678237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003192567,0.00005079976,0.00024399353,0.0014445507,0.000010388902,0.00016002801,0.012755703,0.00021400943,0.0000935185,0.61875075,0.36620438,0.000039905146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005360201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009326749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032408524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009633743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023056913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121230125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152976178","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1253","title":"Beyond Reconciliation: Decolonizing Clinical Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Decolonization; Colonialism; Legal education; Political science; Indigenous; Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Hegemony; Politics","score_opus":0.12303640261836599,"score_gpt":0.5184570339269928,"score_spread":0.3954206313086268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152976178","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17151713,0.00755568,0.03476486,0.5443274,0.0013445321,0.00031761473,0.000035693425,0.00026852803,0.2398686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569968,0.0013650915,0.00690124,0.024313217,0.00018952365,0.00009668269,0.000022403281,0.00008250518,0.010032577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95795435,0.02788825,0.000870867,0.0024079613,0.0037435615,0.0071349684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9616802,0.016908435,0.0039271396,0.0046272967,0.0052704285,0.0075865337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032210633,0.0005428836,0.0006684701,0.0024035675,0.031091293,0.017955502,0.0034840268,0.0073941927,0.005669026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052785322,0.0004659129,0.0006064398,0.002006709,0.08583076,0.016189598,0.029443372,0.015534049,0.00066031533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000360803,0.00010713898,0.0040329383,0.00021918156,0.000015778482,0.00044415536,0.28051487,0.0005372684,0.0003158202,0.6396354,0.011549242,0.06259218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000671345,0.00012576678,0.0053670425,0.0014363381,0.000031121745,0.0005720533,0.26326188,0.001425851,0.000818553,0.34578907,0.38097727,0.00012789996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17863402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26222757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17863402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043114096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13689435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3551885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154621185","doi":"","title":"RECONCILIATION AND ETHICAL LAWYERING: SOME THOUGHTS ON CULTURAL COMPETENCE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Indigenous; Conversation; Legal education; Accountability; Political science; Commission; Public relations; Legal ethics; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02650857606716971,"score_gpt":0.36201536660452693,"score_spread":0.3355067905373572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154621185","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043655705,0.0258999,0.009501664,0.6743032,0.0013070229,0.00006078867,0.000025175319,0.000030011093,0.24521653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94941676,0.008129562,0.003044042,0.03002425,0.00063393934,0.000060823648,0.000013886491,0.000030171055,0.00864666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807733,0.012339279,0.00033888553,0.0006998499,0.0024353822,0.0034132267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900647,0.005962278,0.00076357776,0.00040646485,0.0015967786,0.0012062191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018642474,0.00058833143,0.00070876436,0.002979497,0.016905228,0.014308588,0.0037373533,0.008879879,0.0029300526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01635017,0.0002590587,0.0008260821,0.0021453132,0.12421765,0.015215521,0.011324961,0.011893283,0.00027265586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061734327,0.000014560703,0.00033301298,0.000060308885,0.0000039015713,0.00023288572,0.086778775,0.00018845513,0.00005316645,0.9042531,0.0029280158,0.005147706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021684249,0.000035566012,0.00211367,0.0009933792,0.000013409237,0.0004754452,0.22650048,0.0007574352,0.0003181828,0.58335805,0.1853401,0.000072738876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23419468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20163023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23419468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028048614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03122927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46566308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155054010","doi":"","title":"Rule 2.1 of Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure: Responding to Vexatious Litigation While Advancing Access to Justice?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; American rule; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Law; Resolution (logic); Procedural justice; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; History; Politics","score_opus":0.027454988737322376,"score_gpt":0.36844155630981,"score_spread":0.34098656757248763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155054010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10998162,0.010714183,0.011168947,0.34029874,0.0049411706,0.00030427086,0.00050131656,0.00024080263,0.5218489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7223726,0.0060918857,0.008781821,0.09227873,0.0014714594,0.0001384293,0.000248616,0.00014161343,0.1684749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97958267,0.0018047004,0.0010102745,0.0018000328,0.011191126,0.0046112603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868624,0.0043411735,0.0015516352,0.0010455006,0.0047331434,0.0014660993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009449585,0.0002925213,0.0003474021,0.00073456165,0.008796433,0.009475852,0.002546517,0.007693543,0.0027426928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029200235,0.0005567112,0.0005209034,0.0010745202,0.01149133,0.0034159443,0.0020784885,0.0076644314,0.0006986244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079183075,0.000037152167,0.010475029,0.00024894412,0.00003556201,0.0013985898,0.0143260965,0.00084411696,0.0021360805,0.7217373,0.19131589,0.057365913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041091076,0.0000715762,0.020521307,0.0004983969,0.00004806609,0.0005195833,0.0073490636,0.0009981747,0.0015959346,0.046675265,0.9214756,0.00020593834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8822153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11778468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05034415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11231711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36527413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155570504","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3372627","title":"Legal Education – Some Recent Developments Globally and in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal education; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.01640377406888195,"score_gpt":0.3379821807311893,"score_spread":0.32157840666230736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155570504","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28554657,0.14099345,0.0013145903,0.3419292,0.002629913,0.00019641154,0.006997324,0.0002593431,0.22013313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85455173,0.06717914,0.0024920031,0.020076,0.0006045003,0.000055974222,0.0027831846,0.00013692744,0.052120592],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99389404,0.0004186461,0.00032170114,0.0005597244,0.0023276678,0.002478163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96958286,0.0030543713,0.0024901037,0.00039577857,0.015000194,0.009476658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004663097,0.00035322236,0.00058945623,0.00540589,0.007160415,0.012351755,0.0021677942,0.0027542217,0.019782977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113345,0.0004279165,0.00059684564,0.021020295,0.003805217,0.0045203995,0.0031689992,0.0043661264,0.0007853138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055011024,0.00057789637,0.18354736,0.0026502444,0.00017305721,0.0011490354,0.017608207,0.0013820389,0.0010433057,0.083858855,0.11723093,0.590229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063186766,0.00016259748,0.5106881,0.0020838256,0.00010581489,0.00038457397,0.03901391,0.0005375905,0.0005068837,0.0019992748,0.44432983,0.0001243924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9839791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99519664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8870191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1129809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26311535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8197377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155743310","doi":"","title":"Student Suicide On-Campus: Tort Liability of Canadian Universities and Determining a Duty of Care","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Duty; Duty of care; Jurisprudence; Lagging; Liability; Political science; Law; Public relations; Medicine","score_opus":0.04501254650942251,"score_gpt":0.39868388322863135,"score_spread":0.35367133671920886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155743310","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033902634,0.6950105,0.0006844868,0.19821858,0.0016664548,0.00008024536,0.00010297087,0.000020084886,0.07031401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30855072,0.6603378,0.00095370394,0.024172759,0.00066037325,0.000028596289,0.00010628235,0.0000127940775,0.0051770206],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99212134,0.0011716748,0.00041141105,0.00043314652,0.004672037,0.0011904222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97976345,0.0053047165,0.0024019936,0.000285356,0.01039437,0.0018501362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006995887,0.00032591925,0.00055442494,0.006508597,0.009969309,0.008260868,0.0026430401,0.0041928124,0.0016947864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022825971,0.0004020567,0.0006229737,0.0066734725,0.01676185,0.0024886203,0.0030566643,0.0053730626,0.00017399299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044998087,0.00016296333,0.030039238,0.005117961,0.0000930877,0.0014954592,0.02146682,0.0011841558,0.00044148558,0.2592064,0.10592493,0.5748224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025415377,0.000111164685,0.099916615,0.021063168,0.00023766639,0.0010907248,0.041103132,0.0007846354,0.00043088847,0.022426527,0.8125526,0.00025764658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96779245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98680997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8998471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100152925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26466915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7266637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156382991","doi":"","title":"Sense of Access to Justice As a Framework for Civil Procedure Justice Reform: An Empirical Assessment of Judicial Settlement Conferences in Quebec (Canada)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Economic Justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Civil procedure; Law; Law reform; Dispute resolution; Public administration; Citizen journalism; Order (exchange); Alternative dispute resolution; Procedural justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.061158783451529565,"score_gpt":0.4558131326623717,"score_spread":0.39465434921084214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156382991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880925,0.0004041959,0.00035332073,0.0011100963,0.000012675086,0.00018379872,0.00012746443,0.000007215733,0.009708554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977858,0.0001401377,0.00023067811,0.00014010361,0.00000303739,0.00006232608,0.000058172514,0.0000045116835,0.0015752182],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98966825,0.004523492,0.0003536023,0.00075335085,0.0024259777,0.0022753358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719473,0.011521878,0.0038014513,0.0008741649,0.00836922,0.0034860165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009511598,0.00036787527,0.0005523741,0.0026791885,0.015422871,0.007905223,0.0026302026,0.0016392401,0.004978293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032031234,0.00030496373,0.0003755152,0.00438696,0.007629213,0.0025393567,0.004120787,0.002507075,0.00022483508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024265208,0.00088971405,0.2600254,0.0004822421,0.00007579483,0.000954955,0.6517917,0.0012709417,0.001422811,0.019527867,0.006232338,0.05708361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000262523,0.0001327718,0.35915,0.0003195423,0.000032862135,0.00007790014,0.6216105,0.0017178934,0.0002786101,0.00066762464,0.015916452,0.00006949554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9768809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09842736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09842736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08232561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7141439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157155005","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v28i1.1130","title":"Trauma-Informed Lawyering In The Student Legal Clinic Setting: Increasing Competence In Trauma Informed Practice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Legal education; Informed consent; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Law; Political science; Alternative medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09575948118721386,"score_gpt":0.5498125521665888,"score_spread":0.45405307097937486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157155005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652394,0.0006091384,0.0020280676,0.009623935,0.00018195427,0.0004822088,0.000070098926,0.00009828633,0.021666838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98788995,0.0007357708,0.0067516067,0.0015162363,0.000037983817,0.00016979614,0.00006243605,0.000023373024,0.0028128314],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928837,0.004234598,0.00024106656,0.0004079648,0.0013908879,0.00084181275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675463,0.012094776,0.0037916908,0.0014321562,0.0039432663,0.011191768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009982052,0.00019761492,0.00029456874,0.0007357562,0.001854305,0.0039520534,0.0011688477,0.0013679217,0.009258779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0612834,0.00040576173,0.00034598567,0.00041950413,0.00169054,0.0030794584,0.005835555,0.0036755984,0.0017122305],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039547455,0.016937885,0.18006565,0.0011010141,0.00009233451,0.0021662407,0.20142907,0.0005943861,0.0034903605,0.0044873892,0.041165248,0.54807496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000552504,0.006346852,0.553876,0.004874619,0.00020374314,0.008460173,0.27645218,0.004647501,0.009713985,0.020736404,0.11370948,0.00042656713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014980463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049536824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009982052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015063558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0132430885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05279076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157376267","doi":"","title":"Book Review – Breakdown: The Inside Story of the Rise and Fall of Heenan Blaikie by Norman Bacal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Corporate law; Business; Big business; Market economy; Law; Accounting; Finance; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.013652295920915658,"score_gpt":0.3326709989547796,"score_spread":0.3190187030338639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157376267","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015423192,0.43412417,0.00010552672,0.37739632,0.16767311,0.00004181824,0.00033935002,0.000075270036,0.020090282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004037808,0.35523495,0.00019638568,0.40115422,0.14026113,0.00011366407,0.0005768618,0.0002373955,0.098187596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487406,0.00071733113,0.00034280604,0.0005581253,0.003123436,0.0003843748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97353643,0.006877896,0.0015340908,0.0006923977,0.0143772075,0.002981964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004228177,0.0009234881,0.0016990887,0.0033143074,0.0027202698,0.008122768,0.0028288672,0.007919826,0.025574334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033345673,0.0007419272,0.0007819225,0.0049909074,0.0029144057,0.004613932,0.001998089,0.0104531525,0.023063041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023727152,0.0000012206497,0.000011965328,0.00010895619,0.0000018251219,0.000010744837,0.000013349471,0.000004715217,0.000004490487,0.00022130444,0.99559104,0.004028081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004240015,0.0000040188174,0.0001465242,0.0007955048,0.0000038743724,0.000078795114,0.00004376238,0.0000069012654,0.000009347132,0.00023918493,0.9986615,0.000006189423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.079836294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17668976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079836294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01205329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018186567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1587432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157466121","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Human Rights Law: Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Political science","score_opus":0.048354376906681554,"score_gpt":0.3532366546252945,"score_spread":0.304882277718613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157466121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00082936836,0.0022382806,0.0004916189,0.01636665,0.0013016539,0.00034076933,0.020358369,0.0011322423,0.95694125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016176442,0.0008047719,0.000332298,0.0020406225,0.00007752661,0.000056454162,0.0017742057,0.00016945612,0.993127],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996212,0.0001874373,0.00014052216,0.0002123153,0.002428547,0.00081919425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98288256,0.0016401977,0.00027392342,0.0004830121,0.012042206,0.0026779666],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002861448,0.0011422809,0.001127754,0.0047927443,0.010939922,0.0127362395,0.0028818112,0.011262191,0.46204504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012310018,0.0012146368,0.0008855214,0.0078861695,0.0028925983,0.0031140978,0.0031159474,0.00477743,0.13984574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007650311,0.00002048546,0.00012385457,0.00006950156,0.0000013015919,0.000019277244,0.000059411053,0.00009230637,0.00002592748,0.0084670605,0.9787946,0.012318772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009787927,0.0000043293094,0.0008767748,0.00013537948,0.0000031359998,0.000009232849,0.00017914062,0.0001376149,0.000063355794,0.0014756789,0.997088,0.000017616001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97197807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98770547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46204504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0700621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2633932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7673274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157467767","doi":"","title":"Archer Library: Justice Studies - Canadian Justice System: Students","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.08851303024101947,"score_gpt":0.45616521615822037,"score_spread":0.3676521859172009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157467767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019065939,0.032529365,0.0005681646,0.30272675,0.016353369,0.00041205133,0.012041216,0.0009940495,0.6153091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048632678,0.012815976,0.0005162804,0.013698295,0.0017139753,0.00008175983,0.0011907982,0.00020384662,0.9211462],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858415,0.00010407016,0.00004575802,0.00009842741,0.0006491013,0.00051848334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912186,0.00088383746,0.00017221582,0.0001895453,0.0027152288,0.0048205415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017809286,0.0010453685,0.000736237,0.0035720652,0.027340798,0.0114579955,0.0021427528,0.006155722,0.29362845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070981993,0.00053600245,0.0004248518,0.008371143,0.0033636573,0.0039353417,0.0044875513,0.003364036,0.022985315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018169781,0.000082745784,0.0012080368,0.00020292652,0.000002794783,0.00016642369,0.0017270481,0.000072579736,0.00010926287,0.007751839,0.96151996,0.027138298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001009589,0.000012385513,0.0050650863,0.00017525164,0.0000056912295,0.00005329827,0.005378827,0.000054178297,0.00012930148,0.0008770609,0.9882174,0.000021331296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9583469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29362845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054879952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24089426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.982285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158131193","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v13i0.5663","title":"Piecing together a College Education behind Bars","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Bar (unit); Mathematics education; Psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.030098525799307007,"score_gpt":0.37866609022225856,"score_spread":0.34856756442295156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158131193","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23514302,0.0012739454,0.005139803,0.6053596,0.012932756,0.00043177584,0.00008006261,0.00075098115,0.138888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7433928,0.0005931019,0.010717736,0.07834988,0.0014544785,0.0001869998,0.000100548605,0.00040844583,0.16479598],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873361,0.004014248,0.00024607236,0.0009941894,0.001204418,0.0062049143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9386674,0.0030944457,0.0010305012,0.0019865714,0.0042048013,0.051016334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009113662,0.0006084487,0.0005384932,0.0013391025,0.04209944,0.015486408,0.0029172283,0.008663912,0.05111958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023762943,0.0009783752,0.0008050868,0.00080133486,0.008270726,0.0131588355,0.024995755,0.024242302,0.009238876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024153234,0.0073191025,0.028462967,0.0001966004,0.00006954533,0.0020175406,0.08354574,0.00046379582,0.0020445997,0.05950456,0.43581748,0.38031647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014482343,0.0015840649,0.025211468,0.0008416529,0.00006302123,0.0005368526,0.32598665,0.0007231862,0.0015671218,0.03381829,0.6093165,0.00020638341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021971256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09680346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05111958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00635212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054857317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17101204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158261163","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Other Research Guides and Search Engines","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.45664580636838203,"score_gpt":0.5781041279939393,"score_spread":0.12145832162555725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158261163","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005898787,0.015956882,0.00182226,0.012036171,0.001284138,0.0019747065,0.61676055,0.0033547159,0.34622067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008074477,0.045447685,0.022900894,0.0067863087,0.00067314104,0.006772618,0.30279225,0.0048667053,0.601686],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922437,0.00069337874,0.0010831434,0.00048324827,0.0047391946,0.0007573132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9232376,0.017187977,0.002261699,0.0018661892,0.051301025,0.0041455287],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008215236,0.0020752135,0.0022422415,0.051207513,0.005881852,0.01045741,0.003869955,0.0037744003,0.38897625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06241509,0.0015709095,0.0011960315,0.0952891,0.0020484028,0.0061891084,0.0025091807,0.0025243077,0.1497407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015631367,0.000009093711,0.00010172316,0.0010472914,0.0000030277831,0.000008547266,0.0000972468,0.000033239186,0.000023206949,0.0014539473,0.981111,0.016096026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039465383,0.0000051482502,0.0015630581,0.0016052895,0.000022515023,0.000013739736,0.00035506062,0.00007379048,0.00009819959,0.0011021851,0.9950879,0.000033599124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92821723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96246344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38897625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048725337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21523304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8715512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158317808","doi":"10.29173/mlj1073","title":"Law Students’ Responses to Innovation: A Study of Perspectives in Respect of Digital Knowledge Transmission, Flipped Classrooms, Video Capsules and Other Means of Classroom Dissemination","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Flipped classroom; Digital video; Transmission (telecommunications); Multimedia; Mathematics education; Computer science; Psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.06149793089186337,"score_gpt":0.41398645531271866,"score_spread":0.3524885244208553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158317808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99690336,0.00006449763,0.00009341588,0.00062768394,0.000011125612,0.000021167802,0.00000784686,0.0000021269395,0.0022688035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764377,0.000121222365,0.00011193565,0.0003617244,0.000009264021,0.000038307808,0.000009833672,0.000005630011,0.0016982688],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98998404,0.005495336,0.00035652847,0.0006889725,0.0016177574,0.0018574212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707101,0.015176532,0.0040819044,0.0010469205,0.0040221936,0.004962291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009168794,0.00041281764,0.00068009266,0.0020690213,0.01163777,0.012362276,0.0018948375,0.0042116805,0.0036104734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028995648,0.0008765144,0.0005527573,0.0021730268,0.008996667,0.00583794,0.00990624,0.007623443,0.00044773048],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040313676,0.0004400723,0.021610655,0.000024686231,0.000006636584,0.00039917507,0.97187626,0.0000146773045,0.00070793106,0.0008814151,0.00020401638,0.0037941474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014177018,0.00016444601,0.011830809,0.000036912297,0.000008963121,0.00010560428,0.98322105,0.00005464745,0.00045451726,0.00017157997,0.0039211162,0.0000161193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018713031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034540653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018713031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005806902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008517731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04848975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159186993","doi":"10.1111/cars.12338","title":"Lawyers, immigration consultants and the 33 year jurisdictional war","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration law; Law; Settlement (finance); Political science; Citizenship; Immigration policy; State (computer science); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.04034684125477701,"score_gpt":0.32427450589621365,"score_spread":0.28392766464143665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159186993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3273228,0.05583375,0.0009593811,0.33375895,0.0015688261,0.000054690925,0.00006563587,0.000033411747,0.28040254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93701637,0.0091426205,0.0001952064,0.026083976,0.00028737297,0.000022477045,0.000021329908,0.000013857442,0.02721676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913594,0.001651347,0.00013295564,0.00046173873,0.0018012392,0.0045932387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921027,0.0024343783,0.0008808548,0.00013070212,0.00088079553,0.0035706002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058479835,0.00020229003,0.000387778,0.0020582646,0.027525814,0.012000197,0.0017881902,0.008014303,0.005816396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0111199,0.0004241788,0.00022833506,0.0026427761,0.037000638,0.0050739576,0.0087151695,0.008767291,0.00050155754],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034388213,0.000099013545,0.013692812,0.00009906756,0.0000093269855,0.0026211457,0.14923856,0.00027464668,0.00033630154,0.7246198,0.05193548,0.057039514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017963988,0.000037808415,0.03256993,0.00062222243,0.000009301871,0.0008108912,0.1829165,0.0001089847,0.000116613155,0.033236165,0.74949545,0.000058139965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66549104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8098099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33450896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05933504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09535593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6729579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159571343","doi":"","title":"Archer Library: Justice Studies - Canadian Justice System: Citing Sources","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.08772302948420024,"score_gpt":0.405242015898382,"score_spread":0.31751898641418175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159571343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002903687,0.26798707,0.0010444961,0.2679644,0.053493407,0.00038893474,0.045040756,0.0009286371,0.36024866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06341671,0.50094575,0.003904756,0.08419164,0.027483048,0.0005260575,0.020025052,0.0018280431,0.29767904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900705,0.00077950035,0.0009823622,0.0004213061,0.00686531,0.00088103657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9436374,0.020859744,0.0028377667,0.0023561362,0.027731648,0.0025772178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072003393,0.0017500153,0.0025143428,0.07565152,0.018365605,0.020906411,0.0052136374,0.008888881,0.1219902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069082625,0.001076791,0.0008975685,0.17116739,0.0069538904,0.007302332,0.0063846502,0.0041817394,0.011783316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117775035,0.000008108737,0.00021529399,0.0018400633,0.000013100143,0.00009844833,0.0010519623,0.00004039398,0.000028444443,0.0064068944,0.9753533,0.01493222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010460262,0.0000024817166,0.001567372,0.005157831,0.00007044297,0.00005881449,0.002770996,0.000038864295,0.00010546934,0.002103809,0.9880811,0.00003234771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92784953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9646875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93950516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060494814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17194483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43892264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159604639","doi":"","title":"Courts in the Digital Age: ‘Adaptive Leadership’ for Harnessing Technology and Enhancing Access to Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Politics; Economic Justice; Charter; Political science; Humanity; Infallibility; Sociology","score_opus":0.11864716947679212,"score_gpt":0.39645553995567795,"score_spread":0.27780837047888585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159604639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035516392,0.020097435,0.016399205,0.35474244,0.0019058675,0.00006680685,0.000070670394,0.00027012537,0.570931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86591053,0.015829686,0.0055049905,0.0419695,0.0012561836,0.00008117828,0.000041963835,0.00011564122,0.0692903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763334,0.0011345809,0.00005176946,0.00019855636,0.0005363098,0.00044535886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738675,0.0012142964,0.00016330695,0.00031403726,0.00033218742,0.00058932044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023622732,0.0002215843,0.00013019907,0.00078083016,0.0054988647,0.014132462,0.0009569939,0.0034860836,0.00869156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049427035,0.00014329224,0.000195701,0.00084894913,0.016217068,0.010444101,0.0052968,0.0032653005,0.0012526719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021661011,0.000032509743,0.0009941091,0.00009508457,0.0000059868257,0.00024778701,0.010789002,0.00029030786,0.00056214,0.83092356,0.074022576,0.08201528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013773644,0.000035029436,0.0009993124,0.00033282832,0.0000060114676,0.00018577761,0.0113263335,0.0006691474,0.0006305436,0.1896391,0.7961354,0.000026724625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015673725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037964314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015673725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005886373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007053869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042708874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160389654","doi":"","title":"Marginalized Law Students and Mentorship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Mentorship; Scholarship; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.053062863946376326,"score_gpt":0.42725973909055354,"score_spread":0.3741968751441772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160389654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8880626,0.0035145162,0.0017561171,0.040833946,0.0004652114,0.000071517374,0.000043253345,0.00007084776,0.06518205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947119,0.00035003165,0.0001324214,0.0010817726,0.000040242106,0.000016817437,0.000007628424,0.000008787693,0.0036504292],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98516846,0.009532002,0.00025916053,0.0005842746,0.0014709269,0.0029850793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740347,0.0049576466,0.0034760726,0.0013638504,0.002080382,0.01408726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008779279,0.00036459163,0.00045990438,0.0013554185,0.013350732,0.0111127915,0.0023316348,0.0028074593,0.0113228895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025547238,0.0002257803,0.00028809125,0.00083703495,0.01949794,0.0054480815,0.018720865,0.006003635,0.00080837583],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014977243,0.0012159441,0.056297384,0.0002319787,0.000058565198,0.0025441712,0.6953531,0.00015982086,0.00077816186,0.14083923,0.018582024,0.08378988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003943708,0.00034679737,0.02033727,0.0005384642,0.000020703092,0.0014524221,0.8349501,0.00040776137,0.0004455073,0.031257935,0.11014003,0.00006369798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042478833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071047726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013350732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044705695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007545884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046429813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160424393","doi":"","title":"Archer Library: SOC215 - Canadian Justice System: Home","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Library science; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.05180030175117876,"score_gpt":0.3654207439062683,"score_spread":0.3136204421550895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160424393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019978131,0.003430377,0.00029426772,0.027707001,0.0042245896,0.0002884308,0.031758737,0.0014209875,0.9288778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009593224,0.0019775634,0.00035290862,0.0040050866,0.00046419876,0.000073411684,0.0036591291,0.00029404662,0.97958046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981363,0.000091813796,0.000047518675,0.000112014946,0.00088653556,0.0007257814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418336,0.0005217908,0.00008775309,0.00028351424,0.0030025656,0.0019210875],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001615635,0.0009469936,0.0009423242,0.0033324033,0.015020129,0.012230982,0.0026829245,0.00634706,0.6838133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069001745,0.0005167486,0.00077324116,0.0069368673,0.0022041667,0.0026826093,0.0040645534,0.0027205143,0.13155894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015563166,0.000021158558,0.00019709715,0.00010493327,0.0000022657503,0.00006185055,0.0001475494,0.00004383992,0.0000305764,0.0036358126,0.98182034,0.013918959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012641041,0.000004273912,0.001306178,0.00010438243,0.0000037469977,0.000016291791,0.00057539775,0.000037608435,0.00005558633,0.0005122921,0.99735886,0.00001275019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9667947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98871136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31618673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052792247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19957058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45100194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160901246","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics and the Political Activity of Government Lawyers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Duty; Politics; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Duty of loyalty; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Loyalty; Public administration; Fiduciary","score_opus":0.04122284085966671,"score_gpt":0.3664240374358169,"score_spread":0.3252011965761502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160901246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14509487,0.0039534974,0.008786546,0.21972032,0.00029114584,0.000057211986,0.000018184715,0.00003134229,0.62204695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97528696,0.0007078577,0.0012657631,0.009941873,0.00019600996,0.000039465922,0.000006747343,0.000018013296,0.012537217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97071886,0.021768752,0.00055074494,0.001003603,0.0027358634,0.0032221936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691036,0.017924722,0.0046625044,0.001166795,0.0028271482,0.0043152054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013636598,0.00014943261,0.00023220057,0.0015238284,0.012642376,0.011070709,0.0007039845,0.0056146136,0.0040454906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029842539,0.00031731935,0.00020724269,0.0009664301,0.047066122,0.0042999024,0.0043519936,0.0055403826,0.0006973496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006059047,0.0000537967,0.0029890693,0.000015664738,0.000004062913,0.00009905765,0.01232045,0.00010918873,0.00013952579,0.9733795,0.0035702863,0.00731324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025741729,0.000038049468,0.008504401,0.0002120396,0.000008689901,0.00022757512,0.019318325,0.0005785913,0.00032733055,0.82968795,0.14104228,0.000029051545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071199755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012876354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013636598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008823903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015067255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0721181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161935969","doi":"","title":"Towards an Ethical Infrastructure: Ontario's Incremental Developments Towards Entity-Based Regulation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Political science; Business; Public relations; Ethical standards; Legal ethics; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.023412099216300795,"score_gpt":0.35632487054967926,"score_spread":0.3329127713333785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161935969","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07694382,0.0057955086,0.022149103,0.6812631,0.0017104229,0.0008660163,0.0004268204,0.00036600194,0.21047918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7057737,0.011041946,0.05630388,0.071826994,0.0010234283,0.0005077806,0.00044397835,0.00023387583,0.15284446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96925384,0.006124023,0.0012050456,0.002136577,0.016802762,0.0044778166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91864574,0.020367462,0.0050648116,0.0056719035,0.03078441,0.01946566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029146085,0.00031740105,0.00045744018,0.0017223499,0.014654948,0.013328314,0.0035921754,0.0077190674,0.007854418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038054872,0.00084851723,0.0008991954,0.0025922798,0.016460098,0.0070276405,0.008576873,0.0073042195,0.0008362975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012700795,0.0002302279,0.020259408,0.0009231424,0.000045065237,0.0015055751,0.030491026,0.0027239092,0.002706268,0.6896288,0.12652345,0.124836184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005672239,0.00010152336,0.021249514,0.00050512503,0.00002805181,0.00023927023,0.0071109734,0.0014692604,0.00067131745,0.021088818,0.94737655,0.00010284163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92670995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96856964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15325484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15325484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40585944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98210436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162214568","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-7106-4.ch005","title":"Incorporating Academic Strategy Instruction in Assignment Design to Remove Barriers to Writing Assignments in Philosophy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Jargon; Mathematics education; Curriculum; Computer science; Universal Design for Learning; Class (philosophy); Academic writing; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051483955205019576,"score_gpt":0.34738354585401665,"score_spread":0.29589959064899707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162214568","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20423417,0.0020591011,0.5141668,0.00695369,0.0012055099,0.0026995614,0.00016673034,0.00645902,0.26205552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24342419,0.0013352403,0.68018764,0.0019211386,0.00011501839,0.0014570474,0.0002349772,0.0006512365,0.070673496],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978671,0.0010611915,0.000101566526,0.0002292824,0.0006083708,0.00013240785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931878,0.0049581183,0.0003724056,0.0004237295,0.00068639766,0.00037171066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00265628,0.00048479455,0.0003411859,0.00096645363,0.00097549777,0.0028211745,0.0014051134,0.0007549497,0.010453251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011356022,0.00029351554,0.00031284898,0.0006901037,0.00086272036,0.0024222764,0.0023720327,0.0019495209,0.0031982162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045895697,0.0015456796,0.0018590986,0.0006698664,0.000006302578,0.00015650179,0.012949669,0.00108276,0.0072297435,0.018957872,0.021035085,0.93446153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002416662,0.002407301,0.016043069,0.002138349,0.000046485384,0.0017005026,0.013304348,0.0126141375,0.022784088,0.06111575,0.86747813,0.00012626618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000637752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026537522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010453251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013854997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025253524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034969628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162561628","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Books","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06721405943993009,"score_gpt":0.35520114987588336,"score_spread":0.2879870904359533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162561628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021302904,0.0031576462,0.00017393292,0.0041809077,0.00071310037,0.000070428425,0.0048498157,0.0003784475,0.9862627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00079919514,0.0015618313,0.00018072898,0.00055126665,0.0000653592,0.000024708295,0.0010882256,0.00011987979,0.99560875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986066,0.00006007473,0.000042511943,0.00009058306,0.0009312204,0.00026893424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965454,0.00027048195,0.00007085552,0.000154994,0.0024330623,0.00052523584],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010104275,0.0012492554,0.0008681464,0.006089831,0.008800238,0.010427934,0.0020315545,0.0045976746,0.5255518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050612683,0.0010162726,0.0006345934,0.01131337,0.0023662106,0.0036886483,0.0020784135,0.003038075,0.18991601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004058887,0.000006395936,0.00003920864,0.00006180999,5.837976e-7,0.000009111626,0.000045911118,0.00003347302,0.000015626476,0.008068509,0.9739502,0.01776505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018747477,0.0000012610514,0.00028623236,0.00011324991,0.000001155761,0.0000066821685,0.000096860385,0.00003269473,0.000020847345,0.001076321,0.99835736,0.000005421773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90728515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97072655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5255518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043507718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08898796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6767428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163225829","doi":"10.32920/22223248","title":"Law and Technology in Legal Education: A Systemic Approach at Ryerson","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Key (lock); Engineering ethics; Legal practice; Legal service; Political science; Legal research; Practice of law; Law; Sociology; Engineering management; Computer science; Legal profession; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.034625928238473436,"score_gpt":0.36817964324492475,"score_spread":0.3335537150064513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163225829","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10313063,0.011138443,0.03563028,0.5170003,0.0004501706,0.00013360182,0.000055040422,0.00028754506,0.3321741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8435909,0.008493084,0.02515834,0.017751852,0.00019200209,0.0001880609,0.00003429311,0.00010372959,0.1044878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99113363,0.006142897,0.00020447705,0.00071213505,0.0010280991,0.00077880133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993707,0.0030929279,0.0004429481,0.00041158788,0.00075899693,0.0015865894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008687678,0.00022651881,0.0004810975,0.0014361796,0.008690343,0.014535531,0.0011411933,0.003870755,0.007662702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049499115,0.0005975164,0.0003049309,0.00073768303,0.018612985,0.005987872,0.007763059,0.0069464426,0.00084536226],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015990483,0.00025101527,0.002011411,0.0002411659,0.000010016537,0.0006090359,0.04483866,0.0008614562,0.0015927893,0.83206224,0.038991783,0.07851435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027518408,0.00022320551,0.006445446,0.0011437886,0.000026287458,0.0007182612,0.06328173,0.0034219576,0.0041523,0.19454667,0.7259296,0.00008330382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032806464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05902431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032806464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016860968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026985714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12233549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163384500","doi":"","title":"Beyond Reconciliation: Decolonizing Clinical Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Colonialism; Legal education; Political science; Law; Indigenous; Sociology; Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.12303640261836599,"score_gpt":0.5184570339269928,"score_spread":0.3954206313086268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163384500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18624023,0.0074894824,0.034928847,0.52383345,0.0014261073,0.0003357816,0.000037438036,0.00026705308,0.24544156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593868,0.001254266,0.006465139,0.02271999,0.00017798741,0.0000946556,0.000020622174,0.00008271487,0.009797762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9572666,0.028300462,0.0009284859,0.002460474,0.0038386506,0.007205382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9600019,0.01762021,0.0042690425,0.00503224,0.005642854,0.007433729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0337306,0.0005515166,0.00068038446,0.0024918683,0.030181525,0.017895056,0.0033755903,0.0070461454,0.005603539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054830056,0.0004770815,0.00062827335,0.0020082558,0.09132526,0.016106872,0.028497169,0.014964219,0.00063483504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003755153,0.000102433914,0.0041091354,0.0002156402,0.000016184633,0.00043522028,0.27022463,0.0004969639,0.0003092797,0.65736836,0.009920882,0.05676368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073468356,0.00013399037,0.0057140496,0.0015305019,0.00003309496,0.00056664716,0.26675308,0.0014523761,0.0008500064,0.35243794,0.37032026,0.00013460244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17606944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25413683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82393056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04349331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13341604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3500892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163465424","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Elaine Craig, Putting Trials on Trial: Sexual Assault and the Failure of the Legal Profession","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indictment; Sexual assault; Law; Criminology; Legal profession; Criminal trial; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.023494035817424954,"score_gpt":0.3835799421686114,"score_spread":0.3600859063511865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163465424","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009927782,0.34182954,0.00026015603,0.47292376,0.16372183,0.00013179684,0.00035881184,0.00009139554,0.020583516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019163012,0.27886423,0.00051507266,0.45774093,0.13246274,0.0002526445,0.00039165738,0.00010734605,0.12774904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964317,0.0005996822,0.00028225695,0.00030951828,0.0021863307,0.00019047984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683819,0.017992854,0.0013854512,0.00041563812,0.010047083,0.001777168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003545838,0.0014853665,0.002897774,0.004289487,0.0022055295,0.0052487613,0.004496542,0.01320381,0.02875742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029545749,0.00087768026,0.00093528867,0.0054431846,0.003259508,0.0044817207,0.0015994224,0.010699783,0.020087706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003039597,0.0000022487795,0.000012557587,0.00015809984,0.0000025482884,0.000012383537,0.000016219836,0.0000085304855,0.0000036446024,0.00020560296,0.9944824,0.005092703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022624956,0.000010395154,0.00027020733,0.0013667138,0.000014188329,0.00013579028,0.000090402355,0.000026435746,0.00001720269,0.00051649654,0.9975083,0.00002128479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064700305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18061492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064700305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0087255025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013198201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12864739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163505761","doi":"","title":"Increasing the Emphasis on Family Law Lawyering: Correspondent's Report from Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Emphasis (telecommunications); Law; Political science; Dispute resolution; Family law; Alternative dispute resolution; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.024021227547822942,"score_gpt":0.33412600042626256,"score_spread":0.3101047728784396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163505761","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14747293,0.01745319,0.00065646105,0.67225015,0.009491445,0.00047489913,0.007398235,0.0002853864,0.14451721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62411374,0.025240866,0.0022232363,0.18651639,0.0013415676,0.00020340191,0.003130663,0.00034571462,0.15688433],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98944587,0.0006112543,0.00023785191,0.00050641724,0.005796514,0.003402138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96071523,0.0023888445,0.000690953,0.00029935874,0.020183751,0.01572184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048569054,0.00041387006,0.0005149041,0.0029420825,0.020243078,0.0059722657,0.0023048148,0.0046500335,0.0100808125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013481251,0.00058188837,0.00056888,0.005155662,0.0020932625,0.0013008242,0.0027842685,0.0070072757,0.00066409505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014262601,0.00014755114,0.023693215,0.00058730587,0.00006464914,0.0011120164,0.012298738,0.0002862621,0.0010802255,0.009446573,0.9016431,0.049497616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058679976,0.00006338721,0.1257166,0.00039587327,0.00006937043,0.00027471568,0.031108504,0.00028238882,0.00061122555,0.0003770812,0.8409176,0.00012456004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85091186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14908817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4130641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164888500","doi":"10.1097/jom.0000000000002393","title":"The Mindful Lawyer","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mindfulness; Meditation; Mindfulness meditation; Population; Trait; Depression (economics)","score_opus":0.047329742420902675,"score_gpt":0.3838200651676544,"score_spread":0.3364903227467517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164888500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.931825,0.0027118372,0.0056854016,0.008163079,0.000359988,0.0005966896,0.00007513875,0.00012938044,0.050453566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963347,0.0017976958,0.012364399,0.004110785,0.00016667967,0.00048060343,0.00005225866,0.000013255276,0.017667377],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995869,0.00013392208,0.000012064062,0.00007634734,0.00013963101,0.00005112756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991812,0.00025174493,0.000132701,0.00009848127,0.000056381254,0.00027952288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062638876,0.00011072727,0.0001234984,0.00022063243,0.00067298976,0.0006928781,0.0004804261,0.0005771921,0.0059250705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002263004,0.000119788165,0.00014571856,0.00007876574,0.00080981303,0.00060307217,0.0012002079,0.0012003016,0.0004734281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045993747,0.006708908,0.028717596,0.00092632876,0.000048247206,0.0005898782,0.00923242,0.00009046731,0.031006407,0.009515736,0.011132314,0.9015718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001991326,0.023238702,0.5296598,0.0023375554,0.00030266217,0.013954023,0.017709432,0.0019807883,0.035998024,0.028805053,0.34390226,0.0001203698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026686865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007952338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059250705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030862863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010974298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019821286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164958163","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3334506","title":"Pro Bono Is Pro, Low Bono is Low: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Lawyers’ Legal Aid Participation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative analysis; Political science; Law; Qualitative research; Public administration; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.04649425186983519,"score_gpt":0.44099900775625883,"score_spread":0.39450475588642364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164958163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991098,0.00011920653,0.0005876192,0.0034366006,0.00003252982,0.00016617546,0.00033384236,0.000007418319,0.0042187506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796957,0.00006164368,0.00032981785,0.00046462167,0.000011099836,0.00037808018,0.000108164306,0.000009463044,0.0006675341],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9623658,0.026195666,0.0018452747,0.0016157558,0.0038383787,0.0041389847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7951774,0.16893187,0.014521173,0.0021896174,0.011097453,0.008082528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03733705,0.00029880874,0.00078219746,0.0040120003,0.006081331,0.0073441854,0.0022678315,0.0026227953,0.0056219315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13122578,0.0007437585,0.00047526383,0.0041228854,0.008966752,0.0071526766,0.006363764,0.0049902187,0.00058588857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013723593,0.00026006094,0.074071124,0.00028459114,0.000034418077,0.00011619116,0.91040826,0.00006445978,0.00032136464,0.004170474,0.001439322,0.0086925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010966508,0.0000409393,0.031124827,0.00012800432,0.0000074033887,0.000040445095,0.96526605,0.00011562287,0.00010268481,0.00090629095,0.002234742,0.000022047825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008995531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012560683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03733705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006813589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01227165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19745958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165184503","doi":"","title":"Beyond the Textbook: Assessing the Value of Scholarship in Undergraduate Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal education; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Empowerment; Political science; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.029943031594359633,"score_gpt":0.41410293655595076,"score_spread":0.38415990496159114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165184503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9435358,0.0023155767,0.0022135598,0.0053647696,0.00017451699,0.00021071576,0.00006036578,0.000032118718,0.046092484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940929,0.0007668859,0.0014308622,0.0005513783,0.000067279645,0.00010928681,0.000069366826,0.000012408141,0.0028996079],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832081,0.007956116,0.00090408255,0.00057462923,0.00679132,0.0005656347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9125238,0.05140762,0.010588656,0.002253437,0.015578052,0.007648424],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014186449,0.00022022493,0.0006663574,0.0042452645,0.002651266,0.007672581,0.0013896842,0.0019794663,0.0046767658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1450831,0.00025217302,0.00027527413,0.0031477562,0.00817499,0.007925256,0.009323987,0.0029574472,0.00068492745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003165674,0.0026614426,0.3135538,0.0016468134,0.00007718624,0.0010074466,0.24795443,0.00079050165,0.0023939032,0.09880202,0.010419166,0.3203768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016349573,0.0046691583,0.3762135,0.0036110254,0.0001819755,0.00170225,0.36818492,0.0041203788,0.0044229836,0.1080494,0.12851097,0.00017001497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009089027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020675547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038516808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004154969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075026035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165991118","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: SOC215 - Canadian Justice System: RefWorks Citation Manager","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Economic Justice; Business; Political science; Internet privacy; Public relations; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06630204940795446,"score_gpt":0.3736901965750643,"score_spread":0.3073881471671098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165991118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008860718,0.002911532,0.0004029862,0.0155180525,0.008355417,0.0004213996,0.024072016,0.0017507836,0.9456817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005448036,0.0014288148,0.00045738294,0.0007970691,0.0004483454,0.00014082302,0.0048613576,0.00046701691,0.985951],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99420255,0.0003562257,0.00025463742,0.0004022693,0.0037196928,0.0010645001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97860515,0.0010755332,0.0002868804,0.0010651156,0.016260143,0.0027072164],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044834423,0.0013284486,0.0013351808,0.0072806086,0.013219835,0.015740795,0.003111189,0.005162701,0.59259355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01952516,0.0007076447,0.00093520276,0.013359013,0.0031508773,0.0033523536,0.004375973,0.002639061,0.16128723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011225506,0.000008816548,0.00015211105,0.000095009455,0.000001832814,0.000018814573,0.000095236435,0.000040223513,0.00001681087,0.006043657,0.9794616,0.014054511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008534338,0.0000028927616,0.0008854497,0.000126286,0.000002511018,0.000010305183,0.0002768246,0.00006944998,0.000044686894,0.0007392941,0.9978231,0.000010663906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9462582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96654654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59259355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055849385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20184778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58111584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166490171","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2021.1921370","title":"Aspiration and reality in legal education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06685768084044458,"score_gpt":0.4181443211491431,"score_spread":0.3512866403086985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166490171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014215177,0.020288084,0.0024607915,0.1356892,0.00097355386,0.000021636117,0.00003181717,0.000038514274,0.8262812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84171516,0.009668148,0.0016008819,0.015991177,0.0006799775,0.000061209445,0.000047480404,0.00006227102,0.1301736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960373,0.0021296619,0.000076229546,0.00020294482,0.0008220101,0.00073186256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778396,0.0009729632,0.0001467597,0.000083375984,0.00030454824,0.00070843496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002597568,0.00029328867,0.00032835567,0.0010580195,0.013452363,0.012934943,0.00089435995,0.0025799335,0.00958185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006157858,0.0002027788,0.00025109103,0.0010868313,0.040417884,0.009281807,0.004759072,0.006079401,0.0011980297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030600092,0.000011399616,0.00027563563,0.000019486704,0.000001101598,0.00003801423,0.010740368,0.00005575221,0.000014171485,0.9682091,0.013809588,0.006822291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074428476,0.000013833619,0.0011957282,0.00033354355,0.0000025241352,0.00007560795,0.02936085,0.00023306876,0.000050751096,0.671524,0.2971869,0.000015760115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080169134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13325034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080169134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014064989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01385302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.159405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166507193","doi":"","title":"Disciplinary Responsibilities of Judges in Common Law Legal Systems: A Comparative Study in the Contexts of USA, England, and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JOURNAL OF LEGAL RESEARCH","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Discipline; Criminal law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Public law; Comparative law; Punishment (psychology); Private law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2544394981957635,"score_gpt":0.5118591958006414,"score_spread":0.25741969760487793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166507193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99331903,0.0005315889,0.000037411046,0.00043331756,0.000010971694,0.000023523338,0.00006170181,0.0000021921257,0.0055802194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788314,0.0005801024,0.00006653093,0.0001567132,0.0000032413434,0.00000904387,0.00006217394,0.0000029101275,0.0012361505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581796,0.00072245713,0.00013762666,0.00037189777,0.0013048616,0.0016452107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911084,0.0013927342,0.001195852,0.00021433656,0.003964051,0.0021245037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023600413,0.0002529759,0.00056236435,0.0033416268,0.012867018,0.0039409306,0.0015608959,0.00091730297,0.0018625691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085495915,0.00041918393,0.00022229359,0.0053125354,0.0061930926,0.0012843865,0.0026358012,0.0014163043,0.0001954159],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018162695,0.00027553475,0.44914356,0.00017799875,0.000054335447,0.0028982859,0.5057623,0.000205376,0.0009802479,0.007716098,0.004746726,0.027857933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012074477,0.00005386372,0.59750587,0.00013731424,0.00002608627,0.00033326115,0.3887101,0.00024688648,0.0001340533,0.00017842343,0.012615603,0.00004639731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9857157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99698406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9480433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05195671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05400553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3769741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167490272","doi":"","title":"Path-leading Explications of Justice: Illuminating, Disturbing and Inspirational (FOREWORD)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Path (computing); Sociology; Social justice; Law; Work (physics); Political science; Media studies; Law and economics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03567344649975973,"score_gpt":0.351452375601837,"score_spread":0.3157789291020773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167490272","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045231157,0.10922083,0.01015974,0.4816286,0.05572406,0.000078839745,0.00018838607,0.00021476983,0.33826157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36607358,0.10623228,0.0138010895,0.10359691,0.042454317,0.00031619973,0.00032545277,0.00080436876,0.36639592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801433,0.0008972718,0.000056651916,0.00014361895,0.00072311354,0.00016498766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697626,0.0016254527,0.00016072058,0.000114247414,0.0008662494,0.00025702774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026721533,0.0005320617,0.00043024795,0.0013961503,0.0057681007,0.012989728,0.0012512632,0.0028688484,0.009500774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009220706,0.000313664,0.00035112433,0.0018735977,0.017441865,0.008892529,0.0028980577,0.007221884,0.0019259782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015553658,0.000010420187,0.000104266044,0.00013475346,0.0000030397816,0.000116684714,0.016040845,0.00006551695,0.000115511524,0.57377,0.39271265,0.016910823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004409131,0.00001115097,0.00041156652,0.000562486,0.0000035118344,0.00016122527,0.0135362055,0.00014922862,0.00011623601,0.108209595,0.87681925,0.000015217545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031162893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06647093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031162893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009682009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008568326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070248246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168925064","doi":"10.4324/9781003104285-6","title":"The Problems of a Developing Profession","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.10394605336118191,"score_gpt":0.4040361158874381,"score_spread":0.3000900625262562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168925064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009208063,0.011090451,0.0022860428,0.101652004,0.001629569,0.00007270157,0.00003800851,0.00008191834,0.87394124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28432944,0.022474278,0.0057004793,0.048050515,0.0014445034,0.00024813027,0.000055851277,0.00020599226,0.6374908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979565,0.00093714416,0.000043342527,0.0002253197,0.00035673182,0.00048088375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769586,0.000582529,0.00014628285,0.00014049959,0.00041787958,0.0010168899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027999803,0.00056907523,0.00033504496,0.0011480225,0.0173996,0.010609579,0.0009799574,0.0030635404,0.0147860395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034740055,0.00025156068,0.0002953119,0.0009525792,0.019707073,0.005372647,0.006780796,0.007934728,0.0055268635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016503276,0.0000942302,0.0013198669,0.00012715273,0.00000440216,0.00077475474,0.038761683,0.00011727517,0.00024797104,0.70345694,0.17399292,0.081086256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008432692,0.000026057136,0.00054751715,0.00022524058,0.0000025660927,0.00049069826,0.014917868,0.00005897163,0.000065821754,0.069947265,0.9137018,0.000007810188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018951941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028842071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018951941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073828655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017828654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053566694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169501030","doi":"","title":"Critiquing Instrumentalism in High Education: Lessons from Teaching as a Meditative Inquiry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"University at Buffalo; State University of New York Plattsburgh; Göteborgs Universitet; University of Toronto; Monash University; University of Technology Sydney; South Asian University; Eastern Michigan University; Flinders University; San José State University; Long Island University; Université du Québec en Outaouais; Colgate University; Manchester Metropolitan University; Kennesaw State University; Georgia State University; University of Regina; Middlesex University; Pennsylvania State University; Murdoch University; Anglia Ruskin University; Montclair State University; Dartmouth College; Washington State University; University of Pittsburgh; State University of New York; Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II; Federation University Australia; University of Washington; Arizona State University; National and Kapodistrian University of Athens; West Virginia University; University of East London; West Chester University; Boise State University; University of Washington Bothell; University of Missouri; San Diego State University; Kent State University; University of Massachusetts Dartmouth; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Sociology; Instrumentalism; Pedagogy; Holistic education; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047017127255586384,"score_gpt":0.4046240476756823,"score_spread":0.3576069204200959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169501030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30681068,0.02514314,0.108902305,0.18548042,0.0032232692,0.0006499752,0.000055909928,0.00038238574,0.3693519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96630234,0.0036346444,0.012786033,0.006575415,0.000620021,0.00023944597,0.000016103944,0.00011817158,0.009707862],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98800665,0.010252706,0.00015025253,0.00039441904,0.0007091568,0.00048677134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97689897,0.02010536,0.000563818,0.0007930627,0.0007096064,0.0009293225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010807483,0.0008004313,0.0006232659,0.0015509939,0.009309146,0.010854924,0.003065643,0.0040446375,0.0015306344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014135518,0.00037264853,0.000507587,0.001007833,0.062448617,0.010148751,0.008681322,0.008783209,0.00035129976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026729038,0.00009488792,0.0005886034,0.0002820285,0.000010016567,0.00075227034,0.7381013,0.00039439063,0.00045701032,0.23485145,0.005747513,0.01869372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046810954,0.00014315793,0.0009892472,0.0012095892,0.000013877745,0.00088395557,0.5481662,0.0014587954,0.0016072218,0.24081911,0.2046047,0.00005728428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003095749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053154896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010854924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066847056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045114947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057156146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170337952","doi":"","title":"INTERVIEW: Black Lives Matter—A Discussion with Two Civil Rights Attorneys","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil rights; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.025841521683132074,"score_gpt":0.3248196382406081,"score_spread":0.298978116557476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170337952","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08840211,0.0041702474,0.0009989226,0.8834167,0.0050916853,0.0006493044,0.00018829854,0.00009864193,0.016983967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28416282,0.0025097174,0.0010302576,0.667763,0.0015444735,0.0017567698,0.0001153266,0.00013965355,0.040978],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900912,0.0046538543,0.000362386,0.0007379647,0.0009157295,0.0032388705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817696,0.008383187,0.0010619059,0.0002919169,0.002703053,0.00579033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011455339,0.0009775213,0.001545899,0.0017505802,0.04725892,0.008459366,0.0023353335,0.026250219,0.015154109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0355468,0.0015912115,0.00062327186,0.0016540745,0.0077692424,0.008472543,0.009250128,0.040510803,0.002390812],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010392436,0.00025853503,0.0032153414,0.00020970026,0.000010605845,0.005273652,0.6384237,0.000068651956,0.0010180894,0.009890536,0.33130774,0.010219561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001582099,0.000059936217,0.0016622726,0.00041311805,0.0000043564646,0.00060091243,0.7435534,0.00013409485,0.00019342263,0.0011330942,0.25217435,0.000055156364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0641375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063573875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0641375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013516327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016734304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12752837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170637311","doi":"","title":"The 2010 Amendments and Hryniak v Mauldin: The Perspective of the Lawyers Who Have Lived Them","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Perception; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.04278632546046943,"score_gpt":0.34192084267721073,"score_spread":0.2991345172167413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170637311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90302527,0.002527116,0.0001229185,0.064723656,0.00016719976,0.000021904474,0.000048539343,0.0000075663315,0.029355781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754082,0.001288517,0.00008043046,0.012240624,0.000054806453,0.000013047441,0.000020224892,0.00000837996,0.010885843],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939838,0.0017705915,0.00019305016,0.00040433055,0.0011152399,0.0025329606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905004,0.003947508,0.0019395532,0.00015670502,0.00095078454,0.0025051734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041289185,0.00014420236,0.0002897553,0.00046807947,0.020592364,0.0067893886,0.0010942969,0.0046363347,0.0034781052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016940497,0.0003250374,0.00020158956,0.0010205037,0.011471478,0.0029673001,0.00390687,0.0066808155,0.0002791247],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009005811,0.00023337787,0.057772156,0.000101586425,0.000015391326,0.0033373074,0.8690144,0.00013021621,0.0012924987,0.021026758,0.022148883,0.024837432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009214131,0.00009675209,0.033619687,0.00015001686,0.00000998427,0.00057571876,0.83334136,0.000048105143,0.0003356479,0.00096338737,0.13081339,0.000036721834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4204972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71608096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4204972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027258031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024125539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83609927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172088261","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Nova Scotia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Law; Political science; Library science; History; Engineering; Computer science; Archaeology; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.07400327284376244,"score_gpt":0.36413539623045366,"score_spread":0.2901321233866912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172088261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015724569,0.0036595133,0.00047195575,0.007426224,0.000975852,0.00034398652,0.04269132,0.0011817284,0.941677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014926458,0.0009410041,0.00029938333,0.0003590324,0.000028848568,0.00004429338,0.002918728,0.00015813268,0.99375784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884367,0.00006030473,0.00006911242,0.00011679456,0.0006664496,0.00024375365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99384683,0.00047656804,0.00013473083,0.0002261621,0.004561445,0.0007542296],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011644069,0.0011657136,0.0008682313,0.0047657276,0.007150233,0.008256568,0.0018016857,0.0036087637,0.5320148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060841967,0.0011293106,0.0004794398,0.010281172,0.0013491625,0.0021164264,0.0017954876,0.0019017914,0.19133025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012617481,0.00000825949,0.00015721776,0.00007817329,9.494822e-7,0.000023160712,0.000079922786,0.00006357596,0.000042568936,0.0024783933,0.9769158,0.020139372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006787907,0.000003556078,0.0020210685,0.00013193439,0.0000024724961,0.000014667753,0.0001908661,0.00008117033,0.00006569363,0.00039464928,0.9970764,0.0000106159605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96228313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99058515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5320148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0378735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.096595265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6675241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174042604","doi":"","title":"Attempts and Innovations Conducted in the Practical Teaching of the Course of “Laws of Agriculture, Farmer and Rural Area”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vocational education; Legal education; Course (navigation); Transformational leadership; Order (exchange); Agriculture; Subject (documents); Law; Sociology; Legal profession; Political science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Business; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.08870033518274506,"score_gpt":0.440219173114598,"score_spread":0.35151883793185296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174042604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6905639,0.009500892,0.071279906,0.037582792,0.0014177377,0.0011755286,0.000064102554,0.00018438161,0.18823074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90788305,0.004974382,0.04867669,0.0028422743,0.00018176204,0.0002980668,0.000058874695,0.000034746376,0.035050195],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929709,0.003996428,0.00027026155,0.0007969929,0.0014462636,0.00051918055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945904,0.0024196613,0.0004736409,0.00061315467,0.0012116185,0.00069154217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008810339,0.00028119987,0.00017075405,0.0007343139,0.0025184278,0.0022868032,0.0013165578,0.0013122164,0.0019632783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010740471,0.00019234631,0.00037796856,0.0009897763,0.004520619,0.002214251,0.0024167947,0.0023671822,0.0003274694],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060822473,0.0009830865,0.013187305,0.0012922834,0.000028848784,0.0010204006,0.20280054,0.0012515862,0.008760363,0.3203439,0.0086488975,0.44162205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007461412,0.00079522125,0.033872843,0.001629155,0.00010004928,0.001654443,0.095648594,0.0046286792,0.015468311,0.058277447,0.78770065,0.00015005803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060998574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008012316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008810339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050364626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046594083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174194205","doi":"","title":"Book Review of In Search of the Ethical Lawyer: Stories from the Canadian Legal Profession, edited by Adam Dodek & Alice Woolley","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Alice (programming language); Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Art history","score_opus":0.022215281005356104,"score_gpt":0.3813972626674484,"score_spread":0.3591819816620923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174194205","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015930866,0.4799612,0.0003864248,0.25603664,0.038365465,0.00005737084,0.0005548239,0.00007790351,0.22296704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018701466,0.25225833,0.000650016,0.04892956,0.0100989025,0.000079147125,0.00044064576,0.0002108158,0.6686312],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982926,0.00028940482,0.000037588798,0.000098768054,0.0010616643,0.00021993717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954802,0.0018849086,0.00014671804,0.00006345253,0.0018828184,0.0005419554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017201845,0.00090676395,0.00085214886,0.002741694,0.007998184,0.0078608375,0.0019043032,0.004874071,0.03122186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008504875,0.00039477463,0.00035619235,0.006655356,0.004701919,0.0038359931,0.0018620905,0.004888671,0.0055738934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034236036,0.0000034107736,0.000032329855,0.00011140093,0.0000011931895,0.000036242578,0.0013967558,0.000019423505,0.000024205585,0.0043343403,0.98402727,0.01000999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011780529,0.0000018369393,0.00022689058,0.00024537658,0.0000013916924,0.000047102913,0.0014870948,0.000007808255,0.000010795993,0.00052728696,0.9974381,0.000005204699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73150694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93080825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26849306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027624143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052858848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5401485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175051833","doi":"","title":"Archer Library: Justice Studies - Canadian Justice System: Key Government Resources","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Key (lock); Political science; Business; Public administration; Computer science; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.056948520321827394,"score_gpt":0.36914701775394115,"score_spread":0.31219849743211375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175051833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004970819,0.08420291,0.00079292804,0.22228645,0.013689944,0.000632275,0.058780394,0.001167608,0.6134767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05870817,0.117036656,0.0030888817,0.027486557,0.0036436855,0.00034608273,0.011953978,0.00058794016,0.77714807],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974462,0.00019756948,0.00013317015,0.00014179487,0.0015301261,0.0005511986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880189,0.0027786742,0.00032532017,0.00045293348,0.0062101735,0.0022140956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027980797,0.0010933903,0.0012407517,0.012428267,0.0155820465,0.013687528,0.0026758576,0.004439355,0.26399934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014732566,0.00065824843,0.00059993315,0.032726783,0.0035979915,0.004620621,0.0035386544,0.002655708,0.016437812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014095213,0.000020271416,0.00028618527,0.0006942276,0.000005066805,0.00007846039,0.00055881595,0.000087418935,0.000051352243,0.011287591,0.9611887,0.025727792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001109779,0.000003955684,0.002375657,0.0006073362,0.000015305195,0.000029379236,0.0021207468,0.00005523331,0.00010324838,0.0020018741,0.99264985,0.000026304228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.985342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90797496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09202505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29597571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8831658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175487271","doi":"","title":"Review of Edward Berry, Writing Reasons: A Handbook for Judges, 4th Ed.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Berry; Psychology; Biology; Horticulture","score_opus":0.027426808558616105,"score_gpt":0.37315158065819787,"score_spread":0.34572477209958175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175487271","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003220677,0.6120553,0.004815464,0.26450172,0.08585228,0.00016417056,0.0003019936,0.00019597031,0.031791154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008043994,0.674208,0.008118647,0.16485585,0.043322418,0.00065815815,0.00072091393,0.0005695488,0.09950244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98219854,0.006633612,0.0016824615,0.0007466362,0.008296488,0.000442388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9298999,0.026418526,0.0026299409,0.0009659182,0.038141873,0.0019438147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0142039405,0.0011139468,0.0019885274,0.0085334955,0.0039814855,0.0073115355,0.0027232612,0.004128965,0.012172429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08108821,0.0010256891,0.0008270894,0.007380092,0.005147827,0.007551618,0.0021760282,0.007344092,0.013784385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005052829,0.0000037906389,0.0000303481,0.0003713874,0.0000026317382,0.000030365063,0.00036919286,0.000020241367,0.00002755744,0.0023747236,0.96621364,0.030551193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029553896,0.0000045263346,0.00019271368,0.0014969675,0.0000039761526,0.00009610323,0.00044383216,0.000016785183,0.000028568189,0.0012621952,0.996436,0.00001540959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02595429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048148386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02595429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056200842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02065379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07511848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176005882","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3524906","title":"Institutional Cultures and Legal Education at Select Canadian Law Faculties (DCL Thesis, McGill University)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Political science; Legal research; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.009227705532116794,"score_gpt":0.27735026100882526,"score_spread":0.2681225554767085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176005882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965698,0.0006374101,0.00011442229,0.007080998,0.00004813379,0.000065851666,0.000658016,0.00002759529,0.025669642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98826516,0.00032713468,0.0001298267,0.0004334364,0.000009894414,0.00002228465,0.00014868347,0.000014940646,0.010648587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99342877,0.00066764274,0.00013458107,0.00031260465,0.0019802006,0.0034762882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969826,0.0025014558,0.0019771005,0.00032776306,0.0075873104,0.017780429],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038097298,0.00021948037,0.00045378204,0.004695387,0.024815686,0.010644418,0.0020943547,0.00094592763,0.017681181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016082482,0.00047326388,0.0004616635,0.006097328,0.005045682,0.0020788913,0.0053497045,0.0024618288,0.00088641193],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003019227,0.00086920825,0.7288194,0.00011344399,0.00007278558,0.0003971571,0.1060488,0.0005075201,0.00077720627,0.021627873,0.03691515,0.10354963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018410206,0.00007553909,0.7698272,0.0001921625,0.00002239284,0.00004475031,0.20939715,0.00021314555,0.00039727628,0.0007720831,0.01898878,0.000051073566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97964776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9751843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.124589026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19137573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9039609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176181262","doi":"","title":"Judicial Education for Sustainability","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sustainability; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.05312950971850819,"score_gpt":0.5130948243564365,"score_spread":0.45996531463792834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176181262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007099726,0.009942766,0.0017033347,0.30980802,0.004420274,0.00003483446,0.00013754019,0.00015031495,0.6667033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31380773,0.008457662,0.002088631,0.046341047,0.0022024615,0.000044561555,0.00014826297,0.00011997729,0.6267896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977622,0.0006531821,0.000064758955,0.0001809802,0.0007201295,0.00061878207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957111,0.0016606358,0.00022484061,0.0003624719,0.0007928085,0.00124819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024354118,0.0002020144,0.0002161173,0.000492478,0.005945436,0.005869519,0.0006882105,0.004518928,0.08517373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013659752,0.00014509325,0.0002815894,0.000510904,0.004162252,0.0031558645,0.003875485,0.0058489735,0.004868681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000097429165,0.000045876553,0.00044407218,0.000089107125,0.0000024530846,0.00010209929,0.0012904807,0.00013586423,0.00025470514,0.52309704,0.42132598,0.053202577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064687492,0.000011038324,0.00087015255,0.00019504661,0.0000026855764,0.00003569289,0.00087013014,0.00011341457,0.00020232724,0.035424072,0.96226186,0.000007076442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028227717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08645584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08517373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006527912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018915258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28493452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176676922","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.12914","title":"Academic Librarians, Open Access, and the Ethics of Care","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Ethics of care; Nursing ethics; Information ethics; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Competence (human resources); Applied ethics; Framing (construction); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Nursing; Political science; Medicine; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.22987986170220975,"score_gpt":0.4842959798355384,"score_spread":0.25441611813332865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176676922","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020993296,0.045696832,0.021239685,0.54742205,0.0022005665,0.00010481548,0.000039450086,0.0001127059,0.36219057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80782324,0.02156054,0.010335019,0.108485036,0.004156632,0.00033000554,0.000047253507,0.00016468402,0.04709751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.87972414,0.09571767,0.0037525347,0.0031085068,0.013406349,0.0042908564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8974244,0.069753766,0.006636119,0.006282259,0.009837337,0.010066061],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04593836,0.00039541023,0.0008551299,0.0037059817,0.022806473,0.032134555,0.001994988,0.013869954,0.005625414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06983759,0.0005486696,0.0005976517,0.0049064225,0.09932464,0.022125434,0.022341277,0.009979913,0.0022016587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023897093,0.000045781253,0.001064641,0.00018424579,0.000011245552,0.00022356187,0.04749287,0.0001255064,0.000058926526,0.9035665,0.01957458,0.027628236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020097457,0.000035468827,0.00050752395,0.00092078716,0.0000097556585,0.00040887806,0.030987728,0.00013781656,0.00014821983,0.5795142,0.38727182,0.000037760517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006526508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005261299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99800503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014566322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028919384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24294817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177139875","doi":"","title":"The Paradox of Elite Law Schools in India — A Comparison with Canadian Legal Education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Legal research; Socratic method; Internship; Empirical legal studies; Memorization; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics education; Psychology","score_opus":0.00840637305253825,"score_gpt":0.3210414724893791,"score_spread":0.3126350994368408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177139875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78897107,0.002115603,0.00020875574,0.020184185,0.00010153432,0.000058307818,0.0007553757,0.00008976332,0.18751538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453014,0.0006032356,0.00008590718,0.00093884475,0.000014715514,0.0000121840085,0.00015767604,0.0000148728395,0.0036424168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922692,0.00048120265,0.00019707973,0.00052930374,0.0023148216,0.004208479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887855,0.0014142524,0.0012454648,0.00046082222,0.004308624,0.0037854398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023223602,0.00026005824,0.00046065944,0.009766368,0.021241954,0.010969376,0.0026847788,0.0012680758,0.00730404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066573205,0.00041091535,0.00052355434,0.018618628,0.007980955,0.002089271,0.006154138,0.0027805455,0.0003682772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050225825,0.00046902624,0.27263236,0.0007135593,0.0001454047,0.0026558072,0.18108614,0.0008191794,0.0012931563,0.34784147,0.036390983,0.15545067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046273908,0.00009180402,0.7451553,0.00025630495,0.00008692069,0.00048142156,0.1524916,0.0004130761,0.00041360944,0.0031718633,0.0972599,0.0001319114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9723584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98680717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88067555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119324476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08124671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8657637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177333189","doi":"10.82308/35373","title":"Institutional cultures and legal education at select Canadian law faculties","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law; Legal profession; Sociology","score_opus":0.034131591323524495,"score_gpt":0.3078207849340397,"score_spread":0.2736891936105152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177333189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97082955,0.0006008935,0.00021600461,0.0024314267,0.000020857235,0.00006519686,0.00028142316,0.000014895137,0.025539825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959947,0.00034872736,0.00017653943,0.00021384672,0.0000032093226,0.00001543229,0.00008773423,0.000007623017,0.0031522596],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411786,0.000573268,0.00014840532,0.00036818013,0.0019525519,0.0028397357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889922,0.0016423425,0.0010894897,0.00026799933,0.0036724508,0.004335518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029773389,0.0002700393,0.0004437023,0.0054910528,0.029328352,0.008231153,0.0019733554,0.0009418273,0.006512036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011072265,0.00042262024,0.00034876,0.008271449,0.009480701,0.0018762641,0.0059327506,0.0021112594,0.00019639732],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017458202,0.00022849796,0.39641702,0.00026229944,0.00006550649,0.0011124887,0.44731018,0.0007089762,0.0015658591,0.06610717,0.008928623,0.077118844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009348718,0.00004346917,0.38566098,0.00028716357,0.000029083743,0.00014108383,0.5767101,0.00042165272,0.0004964617,0.0015139212,0.0346094,0.00007736597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98901397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99760276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81583107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18416892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1634659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9462484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177627443","doi":"","title":"Understanding the Ongoing Dialogues on Indigenous Issues in Canadian Legal Education Through the Lens of Institutional Cultures (Case Studies at UQAM, UAlberta, and UMoncton)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Institution; Diversity (politics); Curriculum; Legal education; Political science; Modalities; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Law; Social science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.11983417439522653,"score_gpt":0.3889867036153102,"score_spread":0.26915252922008365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177627443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9173127,0.0026730383,0.0012367256,0.011288675,0.00007898261,0.00009218385,0.00006744604,0.00002643992,0.06722396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950185,0.00081282505,0.0003970938,0.00053146976,0.0000070234805,0.000017318996,0.000011265635,0.000009301149,0.0031951582],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900899,0.0038609141,0.0002020224,0.00051342376,0.0016009944,0.003732647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912115,0.00463542,0.0006247281,0.0003282868,0.0015239996,0.0016760264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008760634,0.00045920146,0.00048736672,0.003251091,0.05287794,0.013433305,0.0027552026,0.002293565,0.0032821998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011636705,0.00043467092,0.0003304204,0.0048193233,0.037114423,0.0040277923,0.009674985,0.0035226298,0.00013772605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114019795,0.000013265714,0.0038856803,0.00004792705,0.0000044681206,0.0006313882,0.9728281,0.00010123201,0.00030287218,0.014452214,0.00067719043,0.0070443805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013411551,0.000005390257,0.0037203417,0.00008643011,0.000006977746,0.00008295748,0.98089314,0.000061208746,0.00015321528,0.0007366119,0.014238453,0.0000139377025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98171026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9913624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85831004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14168994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13408318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177800020","doi":"10.29173/mlj1264","title":"Reconsidering Legal Pedagogy: Assessing Trigger Warnings, Evaluative Instruments, and Articling Integration in Canada’s Modern Law School Curricula","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Legal education; Empathy; Psychology; Pedagogy; Software deployment; Law; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.08873743023764702,"score_gpt":0.38459004445253303,"score_spread":0.295852614214886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177800020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99442405,0.00008573859,0.00069765,0.0006533839,0.000008981022,0.000089794165,0.000018968994,0.00001771374,0.0040037003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580044,0.00012798735,0.0027199828,0.0001825913,0.0000026845712,0.00005170402,0.000031230844,0.00000499824,0.0010783179],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951434,0.0016227692,0.00028783234,0.00025617753,0.0020502263,0.00063965935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857826,0.005211361,0.0026248042,0.000635154,0.003942703,0.0018033184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011325212,0.00028244389,0.00022755917,0.0018776952,0.0035386514,0.003591894,0.0011628474,0.0007104801,0.0011143984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02593604,0.00037552023,0.00017983945,0.0014493115,0.0034874254,0.0016498192,0.002253485,0.0016699798,0.00011177784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008116518,0.00081099913,0.70125693,0.00016096322,0.000018558874,0.00031406156,0.1546666,0.00035244916,0.0043529174,0.0024122123,0.0013052184,0.13426788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012255505,0.00034182292,0.8829496,0.00021088905,0.000024748704,0.00014551824,0.10357872,0.0015146697,0.0034974304,0.0008270951,0.006846624,0.000050697763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5767263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8406009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98779595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012204039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037868183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8515328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181526594","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.1468","title":"Genetic counselors and legal recognition: A made‐for‐Canada approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill Genome Centre; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Genome British Columbia; Provincial Health Services Authority; BC Children's Hospital; Children's Hospital Foundation; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome Canada","keywords":"Harm; Genetic counseling; Constitution; Delegation; Order (exchange); Genetic discrimination; Political science; Law; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Genetic testing; Business; Genetics","score_opus":0.03487576295715966,"score_gpt":0.30984163755365374,"score_spread":0.2749658745964941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181526594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026960637,0.011123982,0.006830368,0.7510523,0.0015704221,0.00019376865,0.0002737191,0.00005684463,0.20193782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8081665,0.017647969,0.009132246,0.104970105,0.0007170203,0.00016490932,0.00021223357,0.00008064033,0.05890831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837938,0.0037086774,0.00038255547,0.0010335895,0.0051421286,0.005939214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97628444,0.0059528174,0.000992805,0.0005494394,0.009316334,0.006904184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01069456,0.00053923693,0.0007531712,0.0052173333,0.02584208,0.016843658,0.0043898392,0.007726335,0.011650336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02797436,0.00050068006,0.0007027706,0.0044043763,0.019390894,0.0072527803,0.0075613833,0.009956154,0.00054104533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033620978,0.00007337742,0.014458054,0.00019781565,0.000030049858,0.0006963344,0.014598712,0.00072731834,0.00013343901,0.8479378,0.07183799,0.049275484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008969042,0.00007110703,0.026550975,0.003232611,0.00017875827,0.0007876868,0.10702544,0.004030673,0.00048694853,0.2210828,0.6362261,0.00023711025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98315215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17667994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17667994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43940616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9549346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181847043","doi":"10.15446/anpol.v34n101.96562","title":"Abogados al por mayor: la educación jurídica en Colombia desde una visión comparada","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Análisis Político","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020484854486104133,"score_gpt":0.4032086305759198,"score_spread":0.38272377608981567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181847043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24593449,0.034356214,0.00485008,0.118906446,0.0012093672,0.0001108028,0.00049894844,0.00018071654,0.5939531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603789,0.005436064,0.0012524255,0.0028050859,0.00014626508,0.000035759505,0.000088419394,0.000024992838,0.029831927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822587,0.0007157075,0.00005051,0.00023847395,0.0003612685,0.00040825797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975414,0.0005734877,0.00043506658,0.00012705091,0.0007284389,0.0005944058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014500824,0.00032395584,0.00027694364,0.0017580037,0.0074353195,0.008114394,0.0006710114,0.0014488719,0.013510499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004263404,0.00012933364,0.00018880628,0.0012388723,0.005372359,0.0031330108,0.002496781,0.0029375232,0.00061165733],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017439626,0.000118843906,0.040473152,0.0011750342,0.00003599124,0.0009903603,0.11128607,0.0008856928,0.0011241451,0.59170914,0.073440805,0.17858632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022761238,0.000078201214,0.06697433,0.0018087629,0.00007682013,0.00032049674,0.118417166,0.00066519994,0.00076539215,0.017114988,0.7936412,0.00011458661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3870106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5838649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3870106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017849725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019273581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7695159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W318445458","doi":"","title":"The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Beginning to Examine the Implications for Canadian Lawyers' Professional Responsiblities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Law; Dignity; Human rights; Impartiality; Constitution; Order (exchange); Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.044012435390449675,"score_gpt":0.3690725844420803,"score_spread":0.3250601490516306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W318445458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008168925,0.057838887,0.0048993686,0.39678523,0.006481405,0.00016454661,0.00058832526,0.000111814516,0.5249616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34808618,0.12278994,0.01682742,0.15902504,0.0030300368,0.00024731722,0.00070134824,0.00035709146,0.34893563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98127156,0.0018635932,0.0004136493,0.0011625108,0.0102306185,0.005058077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98974997,0.002416226,0.0003024169,0.00045682496,0.005342519,0.0017320634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009267282,0.00077886897,0.0006961381,0.0035486089,0.026919348,0.016129483,0.0035134295,0.011135551,0.009337502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020248948,0.00059685076,0.000688382,0.00543641,0.025815204,0.010118001,0.005666538,0.012721689,0.0014958127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010998836,0.000017879896,0.00044327532,0.0001488542,0.0000034653629,0.0001310638,0.009211682,0.0001348744,0.00019286253,0.85551155,0.093022294,0.041171305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005422344,0.0000075688313,0.0014377035,0.0005411217,0.000006147949,0.00005159902,0.005390689,0.00013953145,0.00012319785,0.029506093,0.9627437,0.000047369933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16246328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16246328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36184642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97142386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184491783","doi":"","title":"In Memoriam: The Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family, 1987–2018","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07564549681588184,"score_gpt":0.3935191889132581,"score_spread":0.31787369209737626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184491783","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007627458,0.010260419,0.0003572893,0.5177085,0.41612563,0.00019129334,0.008349001,0.00023984387,0.04600527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016175508,0.0080975285,0.0008409035,0.18204667,0.07901095,0.0005709836,0.005113278,0.00030615236,0.7078381],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99313605,0.0004619438,0.0006143666,0.0008936799,0.003561381,0.001332572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97865206,0.0026758567,0.0006715472,0.00083591224,0.01515919,0.002005557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006463747,0.0010811255,0.0018128243,0.003148256,0.015303307,0.009126263,0.004911214,0.012564587,0.055421565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033470076,0.00078525615,0.0015149176,0.0027089976,0.0038917013,0.004235244,0.0062129665,0.016631495,0.016535077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006521215,0.0000029154498,0.00006178524,0.0000121469675,0.0000015978532,0.000014087033,0.00005614708,0.000006666051,0.000005943367,0.0007804173,0.9980592,0.0009925413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012662447,0.0000029688495,0.001693053,0.00020458111,0.0000105726485,0.0000120076265,0.0004956362,0.000030346157,0.000048189024,0.0005142985,0.99695575,0.000019907799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71495193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84194875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28504807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036098126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06260412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57345355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184497846","doi":"","title":"JUDGING SEXUAL ASSAULT: THE SHIFTING LANDSCAPE OF JUDICIAL EDUCATION IN CANADA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Parliament; Judicial discretion; Law; Judicial independence; Political science; Politics; Judicial activism; Economic Justice; Judicial review; Sexual assault; Judicial opinion; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.025505157438826056,"score_gpt":0.3330110142190754,"score_spread":0.3075058567802494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184497846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17392902,0.041551735,0.0012119326,0.5959113,0.0027770966,0.00018899768,0.00028240986,0.00007586743,0.18407165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9206383,0.019778032,0.0012114487,0.031858236,0.00047286352,0.00003156869,0.00008945343,0.00003885578,0.025881272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98738235,0.0016280562,0.00034875813,0.00077715446,0.0050010616,0.004862562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726158,0.0055375467,0.0014005097,0.0003182315,0.011783637,0.008344387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007670334,0.00026252502,0.00051223766,0.0027703478,0.030318167,0.010092178,0.0032866767,0.0044140616,0.006041503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026651356,0.0006161606,0.00036953576,0.0041260016,0.012818787,0.001824171,0.004065633,0.0070729484,0.00028224013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013242566,0.00023451452,0.045448862,0.0010549637,0.00007404416,0.0034921358,0.07546132,0.0019479026,0.001931282,0.33131754,0.25988868,0.27901638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076191165,0.000095308555,0.1422652,0.0013519794,0.00007987103,0.0005549719,0.08368374,0.0014835113,0.0010048016,0.016838258,0.75223994,0.0003262818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20350978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20350978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40199593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9238158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184928670","doi":"","title":"Public Service and Charter Pessimism: A Review of Harry Arthurs, Connecting the Dots: The Life of an Academic Lawyer","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Charter; Law; Public service; Political science; Service (business); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Business; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1445255684940864,"score_gpt":0.411573877956851,"score_spread":0.2670483094627646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184928670","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001703626,0.9974559,0.000011885629,0.0020735152,0.00028110243,0.0000035141022,0.000008803074,6.4509373e-7,0.00014756208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004993288,0.9950794,0.00007443849,0.0037092194,0.00044793898,0.000015293717,0.000014035,0.0000016256363,0.00015869961],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971757,0.0012139874,0.00042806036,0.00026968503,0.0007757302,0.00013684684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879054,0.008229443,0.0008140749,0.00015568023,0.002458447,0.000436993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059639653,0.0011586054,0.0026578344,0.005742436,0.0012757691,0.004002684,0.0015579084,0.0050966814,0.0040684873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02129613,0.00069476187,0.001104273,0.007641512,0.0023387447,0.004526055,0.0031101864,0.005059523,0.0008544376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108987224,0.00009491017,0.00043367405,0.071517356,0.00033172948,0.000115408366,0.0013514274,0.00014817034,0.00010543558,0.008485701,0.28273132,0.63457584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061911174,0.000073176336,0.0018141286,0.12948388,0.0004287873,0.0002833688,0.0010061709,0.000040678227,0.000050287417,0.0032941557,0.86340404,0.00005943869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025890583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06863654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025890583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005172114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015958358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051479757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185595457","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3686","title":"Courts Without Cases: The Law and Politics of Advisory Opinions by Carissima Mathen and Seeking the Court’s Advice: The Politics of the Canadian Reference Power by Kate Puddister","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Power (physics); Advice (programming); Political science; Subject (documents); Legal advice; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.03325792737775149,"score_gpt":0.33112841050895153,"score_spread":0.2978704831312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185595457","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012147586,0.019177923,0.0012400086,0.65820235,0.0019226557,0.000046372625,0.000116085066,0.000048954225,0.3070981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62145185,0.0202068,0.0015019153,0.14275914,0.002234599,0.00008816654,0.000078700585,0.00018152659,0.2114973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779243,0.0051860516,0.00030115203,0.0014088775,0.010186705,0.004993062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96312046,0.019392597,0.0009221153,0.0007973746,0.012118411,0.0036490753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013979019,0.0004745968,0.0007348484,0.0021427812,0.05615788,0.029259376,0.0038283768,0.016509237,0.009708114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045470092,0.0008968569,0.00043686212,0.003945585,0.03329979,0.007627946,0.004029847,0.015873494,0.0015142247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021326248,0.000015950429,0.0005044537,0.00004901079,0.000010963635,0.0003050598,0.017164215,0.00025739262,0.00012964348,0.6674291,0.29937762,0.014735324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051442817,0.000014761681,0.0031288476,0.00058551953,0.000042931773,0.00014150425,0.026428344,0.0010450195,0.0003149686,0.13888624,0.8292002,0.00016027912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96197546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10280304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10280304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1605172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7458917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186677518","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3684","title":"Law and Living: Connecting the Dots: The Life of an Academic Lawyer by Harry W. Arthurs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Meditation; Law; Legal education; Work (physics); Legal profession; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering; Theology","score_opus":0.04836196825363424,"score_gpt":0.3664124569228177,"score_spread":0.31805048866918345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186677518","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024616648,0.039593015,0.00034202865,0.93427014,0.011855757,0.000012561017,0.000016570551,0.000017775505,0.011430449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18055677,0.07910118,0.0016120281,0.6496772,0.025987469,0.00013564757,0.000047512356,0.00018521633,0.06269691],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908689,0.0064219255,0.0002052738,0.00048051376,0.0012461729,0.00077721797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98776174,0.0064282473,0.0006880834,0.00045490163,0.0017349152,0.0029320926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007263551,0.0006860554,0.0006033314,0.0010121237,0.019343484,0.016252993,0.0022132674,0.009801719,0.0055148522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02708194,0.00050665304,0.0004805956,0.0010429268,0.028060848,0.018811192,0.007345816,0.02533206,0.0020675529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022606153,0.000038230577,0.00028545954,0.00012454309,0.000011535176,0.00029733204,0.08616395,0.0000486689,0.000118654556,0.04945445,0.8438999,0.019534718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063162893,0.000022947937,0.0005253672,0.0007018946,0.000005551072,0.0002444852,0.10133608,0.000045314155,0.000115715506,0.018945485,0.8780134,0.00003752397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023692422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034064054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023692422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006265459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00993323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047109067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186913287","doi":"","title":"Lawyering at the Intersection of Public Law and LegalEthics: Government Lawyers as Custodians of the Ruleof Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Custodians; Law; Public law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Commercial law; Private law; Comparative law; Legal profession; Legal history; Intersection (aeronautics); Government (linguistics); Chinese law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02737623722551455,"score_gpt":0.3189949639396431,"score_spread":0.2916187267141286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186913287","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24568121,0.0024678176,0.005155243,0.5566482,0.0006295873,0.00006334009,0.000024108505,0.000051380193,0.1892792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97261816,0.0007574265,0.0011670875,0.014954236,0.00015370784,0.00003416399,0.0000066513103,0.000023383382,0.010285128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857928,0.008907343,0.00015332135,0.0009390956,0.0008891226,0.0033182364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795232,0.011792181,0.0013824841,0.0006726538,0.001002299,0.0056270733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014971523,0.0002734812,0.00063270255,0.001442749,0.039990854,0.033392802,0.0019106452,0.016949853,0.01845721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026615817,0.000902899,0.0004352825,0.0015076682,0.056756917,0.024659334,0.015285676,0.022164479,0.0008566868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004507708,0.00028884207,0.004041252,0.00003143432,0.0000093954295,0.00091741845,0.17479317,0.00024090236,0.0002341296,0.7834856,0.019458976,0.016453695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010621781,0.00006589323,0.0049183853,0.0003119942,0.00003810067,0.00049681816,0.38441458,0.0013287513,0.00043925492,0.48818216,0.11961951,0.000078371435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062190738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13583742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062190738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01731823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054117855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12565315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187555222","doi":"10.30970/vla.2021.72.027","title":"FEATURES OF LEGAL EDUCATION IN THE LEADING UNIVERSITIES OF THE USA AND CANADA AS AN EXPERIENCE FOR THE LVIV UNIVERSITY","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Visnyk of the Lviv University Series Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal education; Canon law; Decree; Perfection; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Legal history; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016451854379689903,"score_gpt":0.297923230882028,"score_spread":0.2814713765023381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187555222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6390153,0.008317616,0.0006185405,0.051732946,0.0009463538,0.00015795216,0.00083023316,0.00012061236,0.29826042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948155,0.0043220785,0.0006559526,0.003607845,0.00006882682,0.0000411366,0.00027067043,0.000047748657,0.0428307],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499124,0.0006786864,0.000060667095,0.00025119542,0.0013919527,0.0026263054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917052,0.00037012732,0.00025443977,0.00007391983,0.0016447891,0.0059516006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015987105,0.00030988108,0.0003199711,0.0019401052,0.033946734,0.0094574625,0.0014595093,0.0019261625,0.006654124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003231237,0.00023809906,0.00028784445,0.005758496,0.008037027,0.0021608255,0.0070334193,0.0038079584,0.0005323853],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016277701,0.00058408274,0.058457676,0.00035300798,0.00003421898,0.003552806,0.48802716,0.0007152892,0.0015031631,0.13949417,0.1471808,0.15993488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011727532,0.000047223253,0.051423166,0.00031813365,0.00001110869,0.00045741268,0.39640096,0.00017154464,0.00038388884,0.0013508939,0.54932916,0.00009475646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9657615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98996747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8731754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12682465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22343723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9201815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187830841","doi":"","title":"Critique-Inspired Pedagogies in Canadian Criminal Law Casebooks: Challenging \"Doctrine First, Critique Second\" Approaches to First-Year Law Teaching","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Criminal law; Political science; Comparative law; Criminal procedure; Casebook; Sociology","score_opus":0.10005080686556474,"score_gpt":0.35492270524034897,"score_spread":0.25487189837478424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187830841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58310187,0.0063564284,0.020641115,0.024592265,0.0011558641,0.0007789422,0.00016887226,0.00034544058,0.36285925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9259534,0.0033643646,0.013430002,0.0015998748,0.00009153156,0.00026176794,0.00011799695,0.00016684762,0.055014346],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911814,0.004147897,0.00021677712,0.0005214963,0.0030544843,0.0008778695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97555363,0.014917565,0.001174492,0.0010714793,0.0054879957,0.0017948883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010237401,0.0008185082,0.00042397465,0.004725157,0.017030727,0.012083918,0.0026558063,0.002075168,0.004641736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030396122,0.0003790377,0.0003456914,0.0033029106,0.015700938,0.0035288655,0.006573678,0.0041261367,0.0004023895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040460596,0.0001385303,0.002720343,0.000433755,0.000008124217,0.00067559397,0.74084914,0.00066781096,0.0017111308,0.08713025,0.017367389,0.14825748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027944854,0.00016262243,0.00796229,0.001067854,0.000025554336,0.0006215368,0.35939568,0.0006886245,0.0031078178,0.011533752,0.61530226,0.00010401455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50562334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7693708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93981874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060181253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064320154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189926638","doi":"10.29173/mlj881","title":"An Interview with the Justice Minister and Attorney General of Manitoba","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.05666679287744096,"score_gpt":0.3491795685288526,"score_spread":0.29251277565141165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189926638","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37449872,0.0060510496,0.0013888192,0.56711805,0.0027321884,0.00086556515,0.00045633854,0.00008441462,0.046804864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6042336,0.0034790027,0.0017190545,0.27823398,0.00046414358,0.00078092277,0.00013304215,0.00008694011,0.11086924],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955142,0.0018614238,0.0001489269,0.00041329113,0.0006316305,0.0014305576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937736,0.001722677,0.0002824185,0.00006915751,0.0015284198,0.0026236793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004570511,0.00045130696,0.0007707999,0.0012240777,0.04008222,0.0049180537,0.0016902456,0.011765778,0.008793066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008263255,0.0014790108,0.000364338,0.0019570272,0.0048251287,0.0023168437,0.0035170454,0.015420983,0.0010316318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021400057,0.0004619755,0.034978956,0.00044139597,0.00004523732,0.017925033,0.70440006,0.00042662065,0.007519162,0.00991104,0.21211128,0.011565275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036698788,0.00015305284,0.030380728,0.000504727,0.00002377188,0.0014442388,0.5894651,0.00044149684,0.00070486707,0.00079459016,0.37593254,0.00011823668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7031837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82900953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2968163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0337173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045732606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59712857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190552066","doi":"","title":"Administering Justice and Serving the People: The Tension between the Objective of Judicial Efficiency and Informal Justice in Canadian Access to Justice Initiatives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Adjudication; Legitimacy; Political science; Procedural justice; Civil procedure; Proportionality (law); Law; Public administration; Dispute resolution; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.04239961594552765,"score_gpt":0.3928757516428561,"score_spread":0.35047613569732844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190552066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29684356,0.02937432,0.008320343,0.27008638,0.0007150247,0.00023309133,0.0003136727,0.00011172027,0.3940019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680085,0.0066899033,0.0021237165,0.007959002,0.00009821679,0.00003667249,0.000047145655,0.000037118152,0.014999736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860853,0.0028458221,0.0003000676,0.0008273214,0.0054822853,0.0044591716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905323,0.0028659797,0.0006295398,0.0003192781,0.0025858185,0.0030671386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008861671,0.0003780437,0.000608943,0.0030562645,0.030424228,0.015950916,0.0022531569,0.0028595552,0.0037050978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014730268,0.00042666908,0.00038777821,0.0061943135,0.035306316,0.004546429,0.00786346,0.005360191,0.00017221879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000404866,0.00004627085,0.0103211645,0.0003555135,0.0000272039,0.00047506724,0.116217405,0.00066255947,0.00038404868,0.77596927,0.017530143,0.077970885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059522252,0.00007958511,0.08445296,0.0018011744,0.000113344,0.00038412353,0.19398876,0.0017531097,0.00071914203,0.10885003,0.60750556,0.00029266812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99761117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7668778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23312221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3126958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8894695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190782478","doi":"","title":"Sector Guides: Solicitor, Legal Executive and Other Legal Roles: Canadian law students at Sussex","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal research","score_opus":0.051960532557879247,"score_gpt":0.3976894818579523,"score_spread":0.34572894930007303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190782478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102824695,0.005901611,0.001757839,0.08678265,0.0018482642,0.0013246996,0.010447167,0.00096708897,0.7881459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04493813,0.0012882364,0.0011059196,0.0028511353,0.000040428233,0.00012291763,0.0010029539,0.00015126079,0.9484989],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976036,0.00021985768,0.00007471747,0.00011537029,0.0011475355,0.00083905907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870658,0.0009058052,0.00022712264,0.00016888416,0.0050656125,0.0065668654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031515695,0.0004590437,0.0002652007,0.0018500736,0.017584823,0.0065112743,0.0015277918,0.0032720182,0.16370067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005214807,0.0007860763,0.00020312132,0.0029810853,0.0024378502,0.002195438,0.0025841752,0.0024482522,0.020802129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019923878,0.00009257573,0.006325643,0.00008540929,0.0000012049993,0.00017384606,0.0119443,0.00007052791,0.00035054862,0.0051118494,0.92856395,0.04726019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013535512,0.00002769251,0.022600288,0.00022297387,0.000003040341,0.00010745111,0.056657117,0.00011290093,0.00025620556,0.0005955595,0.9193772,0.00002608705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9448517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16370067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035965204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2415243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5476333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191674255","doi":"","title":"Education Without Representation: Cultural Fluency, Diversity, and Dispute Resolution in the Canadian Context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Cultural diversity; Indigenous; Fluency; Reputation; Representation (politics); Population; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.040408789041762275,"score_gpt":0.3778882943850038,"score_spread":0.33747950534324156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191674255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90699047,0.00326619,0.00037580187,0.023230463,0.00018789207,0.000047102032,0.000111248075,0.000009720183,0.065780975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962954,0.0009376221,0.000118087526,0.0009576979,0.00002675354,0.0000045468723,0.000024116025,0.000003207112,0.0016325347],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885273,0.0021407919,0.0004366568,0.00046116894,0.004399647,0.004034497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98540884,0.0043203547,0.0018550878,0.00042577588,0.0040120715,0.0039778743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065770326,0.00026623486,0.0003973699,0.004581456,0.03326693,0.010765147,0.0026983735,0.0015949778,0.0028874415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02172059,0.00020668066,0.00034353885,0.0069796904,0.018926976,0.003046724,0.007593473,0.0029324356,0.00009584113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008254322,0.00015553884,0.1679685,0.0001859945,0.000042102296,0.0024624611,0.65274036,0.00036557057,0.00028135133,0.0845032,0.010696326,0.08051605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012193665,0.00003444109,0.15043783,0.00036331348,0.000025958258,0.0006844881,0.7889497,0.00029318567,0.00015979102,0.0057246615,0.0532388,0.000075542586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087540515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087540515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11710733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6351539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193329648","doi":"","title":"Pragmatic and Logical: The Supreme Court of Canada's White Burgess Decision","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Safeguarding; Impartiality; Law; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Economic Justice; White (mutation); Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01498182470299333,"score_gpt":0.3097276262568572,"score_spread":0.2947458015538639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193329648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021812394,0.0082222065,0.0021716563,0.66193616,0.0029559068,0.00008648436,0.00056934933,0.00005696654,0.3021888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39283895,0.0044147708,0.0021523118,0.50360966,0.002150854,0.0001283231,0.00025945526,0.00009445922,0.09435131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97817296,0.0029093863,0.00048032557,0.0021249584,0.009927017,0.006385347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98524773,0.0065855533,0.0004002733,0.00041150683,0.0050258287,0.0023291602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015552195,0.0005092878,0.00085964287,0.0017472719,0.031319033,0.020834127,0.0035833863,0.020869274,0.005901975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03962943,0.00081762695,0.0009214806,0.0027256669,0.018079914,0.0049275444,0.0039163805,0.022276692,0.0007543708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031408625,0.000016812917,0.0008142064,0.000033600332,0.000021121936,0.00038046998,0.0028700677,0.00029279312,0.00015538711,0.80420434,0.18532506,0.0058547542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017016959,0.000034279496,0.0056373957,0.00076346734,0.000141473,0.00018746471,0.0077885627,0.0014170384,0.00054377597,0.19955702,0.78347147,0.00028790085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9601427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9779755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085731424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085731424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2210903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62202793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193978425","doi":"","title":"Entretien avec Suzanne Côté (Interview with Suzanne Côté)","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.017797046537641466,"score_gpt":0.2981740987277788,"score_spread":0.2803770521901373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193978425","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13331828,0.034879968,0.0008102802,0.6846701,0.010050162,0.00023904452,0.0009271048,0.000071524264,0.13503362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58932287,0.009280066,0.00048340802,0.12328916,0.0008891628,0.00031359182,0.00016955823,0.000111494424,0.27614063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803966,0.000864874,0.000048871232,0.00022989817,0.0003007536,0.0005159097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964181,0.0008973365,0.0002243874,0.000053667325,0.0012062747,0.0012003005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001903128,0.00058236776,0.00041419885,0.0010953231,0.016264973,0.0034419112,0.0010047255,0.004178683,0.025180867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007038993,0.0006058782,0.00021559146,0.0016821352,0.0034918229,0.0020992015,0.0022754702,0.0048771272,0.002032038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053096534,0.00004064477,0.011607147,0.0002292549,0.00001356097,0.0038458493,0.22263016,0.000054281554,0.0010584021,0.008080392,0.74055123,0.011836016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005176678,0.000016189751,0.014779345,0.0003513185,0.000005890161,0.00054802455,0.17435771,0.000038199727,0.00021206442,0.000252054,0.80939204,0.00004200263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7332221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8170303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7332221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018759854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0115727205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5366979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194067472","doi":"","title":"Cooperative Design Lawyering: How Can Lawyers Prevent Disputes Through Value Innovation?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Business; Scope (computer science); Competitive advantage; Forum shopping; Legal service; Reciprocal; Predictability; Law and economics; Industrial organization; Marketing; Law; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03402401271035346,"score_gpt":0.3450857034767821,"score_spread":0.31106169076642864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194067472","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08482552,0.011045884,0.23707308,0.396844,0.0013421735,0.0006299832,0.000050066647,0.00046872176,0.2677206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8933687,0.0034706702,0.06342434,0.017181175,0.00039932257,0.00035130183,0.000037861962,0.00009585396,0.02167073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9732833,0.015286709,0.00075430406,0.0024822399,0.0053462903,0.0028472461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548468,0.027103255,0.005545932,0.004482262,0.004444813,0.0035768696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033198465,0.0005650403,0.00080288004,0.0023906867,0.009813402,0.020427728,0.0038618534,0.014795705,0.0102274185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0708539,0.0006813,0.00089688593,0.0017179585,0.028168896,0.028791793,0.012290079,0.008351986,0.0020805665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004479479,0.00037764118,0.0031522727,0.00038264223,0.00003118059,0.0003591237,0.02004015,0.001016868,0.00093667104,0.83056325,0.013492632,0.1296028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008401958,0.0002111996,0.001093435,0.000696772,0.000031251715,0.00034808146,0.016796367,0.0028460822,0.0014071611,0.76755464,0.20884372,0.00008730474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027256527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030044557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033198465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006257837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013924957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17557234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194364949","doi":"","title":"A Conversation About Canadian Legal Education: Lakehead University and Dialogue Pedagogy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Socratic method; Conversation; Legal education; Class (philosophy); Empathy; Legal writing; Pedagogy; Sociology; Law; Tort; Psychology; Legal research; Mathematics education; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Liability","score_opus":0.020441868506605346,"score_gpt":0.31449179749265466,"score_spread":0.2940499289860493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194364949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23763077,0.0051089795,0.0025215456,0.2784709,0.0015651669,0.00018771167,0.00034445807,0.00029586867,0.4738746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8296684,0.0019640513,0.0014038642,0.011071489,0.00011343357,0.00008192676,0.000086901564,0.00014245244,0.15546748],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99438393,0.001430071,0.0000894178,0.00052258087,0.0014206365,0.0021534334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937779,0.0013142816,0.00024132051,0.000152266,0.001351073,0.0031631095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041306615,0.00047792602,0.00040806684,0.0016284528,0.08117437,0.011225867,0.0021686698,0.0046920013,0.019835426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008030532,0.00048112366,0.00045079598,0.0028153062,0.019391581,0.004728854,0.0074311118,0.0062408093,0.0009240874],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059312522,0.00009589218,0.006439717,0.00011841454,0.000011361612,0.0017608054,0.69282305,0.0001856456,0.000999258,0.10903143,0.14301272,0.045462314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009406223,0.000025042316,0.007635447,0.00016589028,0.000010093666,0.00016967984,0.35294476,0.00019195421,0.00026186334,0.00267503,0.63584703,0.000063725165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99206513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2182757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2182757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17929365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9066894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195000632","doi":"","title":"Caught By Private Law: A Review Of Visitors’ Jurisdiction In Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Appeal; Law; Adjudication; Visitor pattern; Political science; Position (finance); Private law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.01955772057701646,"score_gpt":0.3582580842686784,"score_spread":0.33870036369166195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195000632","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028853174,0.9952819,0.000031271848,0.0014357303,0.00013280392,0.000008513837,0.00003124678,0.0000020991629,0.002787773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065314746,0.9919703,0.000073326555,0.0009436054,0.000099484256,0.000007939042,0.000030781244,0.0000034031643,0.00033975285],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946036,0.0009774868,0.000371679,0.00041579735,0.003048186,0.0005832155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833883,0.0076871356,0.0010527334,0.0002620513,0.006664708,0.0009450976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070455507,0.00069367746,0.0018169051,0.011019302,0.0032701634,0.005486932,0.002110495,0.0026027618,0.003207756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017621914,0.0006446455,0.00087717315,0.02308313,0.006492965,0.0024377818,0.00172053,0.003006446,0.00034376603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012202995,0.00007217827,0.002217842,0.050001103,0.00035107357,0.00031741482,0.0033461486,0.00076280936,0.00020710062,0.0828085,0.11471683,0.7450769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002243998,0.0000473703,0.008655117,0.05279092,0.00036143744,0.0002445943,0.0015211087,0.00011143638,0.000110160574,0.0026099114,0.9334669,0.000058622856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88080925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93589556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11919075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06534758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17265464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47413212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195279425","doi":"10.29173/mlj956","title":"Legal Education in Manitoba: 1913-1950","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03585863411803336,"score_gpt":0.3529999381349887,"score_spread":0.31714130401695534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195279425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89361614,0.00606361,0.00022188827,0.023231704,0.00024960944,0.00021238574,0.0017148315,0.000050394247,0.074639454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8277509,0.0038354592,0.00058620074,0.0053781387,0.00010856407,0.0001569811,0.0005715381,0.000030112675,0.16158205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991334,0.00008834398,0.00002290224,0.000056740755,0.00013572875,0.0005628817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979328,0.00027372665,0.00016355554,0.000037450605,0.00047783507,0.0011146506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083238556,0.00025131254,0.00026572665,0.0017504393,0.0108566135,0.0020530908,0.0021437122,0.0018454987,0.012730693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023426665,0.0005928116,0.00021451824,0.003088445,0.0019969894,0.00083310326,0.0032951368,0.002580936,0.0011019626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004693623,0.0014658197,0.38926077,0.00092451787,0.00009825232,0.007936923,0.26046377,0.0008825514,0.0061621983,0.06524774,0.08704992,0.18003817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041884483,0.0001248127,0.6963756,0.00048668886,0.000030023288,0.00038485776,0.06616889,0.00027177652,0.0010500485,0.00085554697,0.2341773,0.00003263485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9547519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93901855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06098145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0862401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4424535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195583118","doi":"","title":"The Legal Profession in the Digital Age: Empirical Evidence from the DTUWatson Project","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Digital evidence; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Computer science; Digital forensics; Computer security","score_opus":0.25649266556792677,"score_gpt":0.45310726531924533,"score_spread":0.19661459975131856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195583118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602526,0.0023131294,0.00033697084,0.002553764,0.000024481613,0.000035456364,0.00018796526,0.0000059998833,0.034289587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99235874,0.0020840091,0.00027296407,0.00034423263,0.000019717,0.000034862445,0.00016629009,0.00001431923,0.00470484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884885,0.0058084717,0.00053856126,0.0008504249,0.0032105814,0.0011035522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89901805,0.06861521,0.01728334,0.0033619867,0.0049197604,0.00680168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014017394,0.00019038338,0.00035964095,0.004273539,0.004964049,0.0054634963,0.0011527599,0.0017325751,0.012669536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04995179,0.0004806419,0.00013411019,0.0056825844,0.0060680043,0.0068324474,0.0075048213,0.001977553,0.0016115068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004518511,0.0022046587,0.44635004,0.0005981016,0.000051199513,0.0017877689,0.33204603,0.0005266681,0.00035724565,0.047275983,0.011152005,0.15719849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007811907,0.00025740187,0.42823613,0.0014440339,0.00004086541,0.0009728981,0.41660997,0.0009586874,0.00047628884,0.006207646,0.14466427,0.0000537033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021591427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037800774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021591427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030118993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005028094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074131906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196175286","doi":"","title":"LAWYERS’ MONOPOLY? THINK AGAIN::","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Statute; Legal profession; Law; Practice of law; Legal ethics; Privilege (computing); Public interest; Duty; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.08242331306526648,"score_gpt":0.3999953027688611,"score_spread":0.31757198970359457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196175286","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049985964,0.005585215,0.0010775063,0.95302606,0.0006997343,0.000016528129,0.00008654077,0.000030807456,0.034479003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4104517,0.007181811,0.0015430872,0.5330904,0.0025391446,0.00005992215,0.00007648221,0.00006671527,0.044990666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944108,0.0010594577,0.00012352907,0.0010894801,0.0018884289,0.0014283179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868253,0.00577605,0.001119386,0.00057730847,0.0039749397,0.001727133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065038935,0.00035354003,0.0007587825,0.0013703371,0.00856388,0.010702443,0.0030504076,0.01339704,0.022969846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030698383,0.00029561477,0.00052283815,0.0012765828,0.027013669,0.015599119,0.0029077688,0.012181492,0.0035873945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004061591,0.000036600803,0.0022140732,0.00023703944,0.0000306032,0.00026520438,0.011476594,0.00007713575,0.00022128267,0.7234979,0.23561753,0.026285436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072195144,0.00003694971,0.0066240616,0.0011621466,0.000058301383,0.00043765755,0.026934119,0.00040299646,0.0004957229,0.24075031,0.72294927,0.000076307035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49848777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4536574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49848777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024831126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030347893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196891202","doi":"","title":"WHERE ARE WE GOING? THE PAST AND FUTURE OF CANADIAN SCHOLARSHIP ON LEGAL ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT LAWYERS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Order (exchange); Strengths and weaknesses; Political science; Legal ethics; Work (physics); Legal profession; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Engineering; Business; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12446722641475487,"score_gpt":0.38671459773525396,"score_spread":0.2622473713204991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196891202","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010839777,0.17688394,0.0019980876,0.72555536,0.0031979873,0.000022234626,0.0001055122,0.000051962397,0.081345096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6458591,0.24414761,0.007043937,0.07103459,0.0026535757,0.00007790168,0.00012262925,0.00012221455,0.028938457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744776,0.0080524385,0.00063738244,0.0014957726,0.010281458,0.0050553004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93098897,0.02256236,0.0029447295,0.0018624243,0.032289773,0.009351703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023954364,0.0006232181,0.0012356562,0.0068375804,0.031727575,0.028040498,0.0030172134,0.005311583,0.006381236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04977613,0.0004660344,0.00057180953,0.011090481,0.052507866,0.012809601,0.0072989766,0.01021828,0.0006341061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003880162,0.0000249361,0.0021509368,0.00088687026,0.000022407323,0.00013231667,0.03624713,0.00030395153,0.00015877046,0.7771453,0.08809962,0.094788894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014409468,0.000025984034,0.005969117,0.0035670074,0.00003912136,0.00011342186,0.07414534,0.00040955635,0.00018917468,0.17110303,0.7443001,0.00012373128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9657876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98333424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79285353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20714648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40991977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9195977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W319910510","doi":"","title":"Dean Penelope Andrews: Advocacy, Leadership, Vision","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Practice of law; Sociology; Political science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.17006499534824487,"score_gpt":0.4476186952387733,"score_spread":0.2775536998905284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W319910510","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008675608,0.043449033,0.00044277788,0.8133703,0.053498775,0.00008853332,0.000060433926,0.00014467015,0.088078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032036655,0.031977963,0.0009891753,0.32999206,0.025872407,0.00017192494,0.00012391878,0.00012895867,0.5787069],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947082,0.00082679285,0.00018274049,0.0005227064,0.00266662,0.0010929508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99078923,0.00041545127,0.00027526825,0.00015853524,0.00199138,0.0063701617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003860238,0.0005873006,0.00035749612,0.0009971086,0.008780856,0.011635444,0.0014673761,0.008198577,0.023078585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007376823,0.00046888556,0.0003004049,0.00077350874,0.0043848692,0.005573124,0.0053703366,0.00969956,0.009668988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018076522,0.000014896245,0.00015535648,0.000032748485,6.0084903e-7,0.000027614067,0.00017332671,0.000006434251,0.00003150115,0.0041148593,0.9839094,0.011531326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032601793,0.000009287493,0.0003718033,0.00006851065,8.594234e-7,0.000050746767,0.00048870617,0.000010781122,0.000031031555,0.00064708665,0.9983132,0.0000048269344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04723661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07815411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04723661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009833834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034117408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09392333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200672922","doi":"10.29173/assert13","title":"Q &amp; A with Thomas Misco on “Practice requires rationale: Lessons from global contexts to ensure controversial issue education”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Social Studies Education Research for Teachers","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4419369988653726,"score_gpt":0.6192196960597562,"score_spread":0.17728269719438366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200672922","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009199909,0.001600123,0.0018571696,0.8961415,0.014275724,0.00006479599,0.000059002097,0.00010724037,0.084974386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028437275,0.0015030386,0.0026643851,0.526747,0.005534234,0.00017825956,0.00004829563,0.00033013488,0.43455747],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871293,0.0045349016,0.0005877266,0.0019602475,0.0046146614,0.0011732542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9432236,0.032390058,0.0011775292,0.0023076227,0.013670303,0.00723089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012877991,0.00047792675,0.00059261813,0.00084853463,0.014793856,0.015191866,0.0022386676,0.02188834,0.06924352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0711056,0.0007846357,0.0007220137,0.00078747683,0.0092792325,0.009584968,0.0063992627,0.020424051,0.018782264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010249299,0.000022305929,0.00025925486,0.00006245814,0.0000045222264,0.00009530962,0.0020084595,0.00003776943,0.00012172813,0.05215568,0.9306823,0.014539954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008333145,0.0000088269735,0.0003672549,0.00018149755,0.000003833749,0.000069014095,0.00312863,0.00012151911,0.00020216605,0.020582624,0.97530377,0.00002267083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027649567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07107502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06924352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062988736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02378857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23164266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201831831","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Ontario Legislative Research: Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8246744847002508,"score_gpt":0.6635258412885947,"score_spread":0.16114864341165613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201831831","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011470815,0.0044312375,0.0014365743,0.009405727,0.0006178105,0.002795548,0.55189824,0.0022577692,0.42601004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008315017,0.016305922,0.008846214,0.0026368026,0.00046834484,0.006461898,0.18308514,0.00270219,0.77117854],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903706,0.000981202,0.0012949199,0.0006933639,0.0057681752,0.0008918571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9012753,0.020614732,0.0041746856,0.0057080155,0.060932357,0.007294921],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009847001,0.0011955593,0.0019810437,0.022550512,0.006734268,0.008271339,0.0024377124,0.0023523835,0.5012385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058558367,0.002282612,0.00078543014,0.051302943,0.002370458,0.004962113,0.002509819,0.0018001426,0.20315659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018173647,0.000012126133,0.0003894716,0.0006113558,0.0000025908598,0.000009797778,0.00023251798,0.000026410542,0.000033148648,0.0014062953,0.9795599,0.017698249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027311864,0.000007506567,0.0036239997,0.00063305476,0.000011190278,0.000008328131,0.0004594481,0.000046472294,0.00008327111,0.00046120674,0.99462235,0.000015855963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8634283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95331615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8634283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058351077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24872448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7114227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201920784","doi":"","title":"Rules, Rationality, and the Significance of Standpoint","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02607782510128088,"score_gpt":0.35231795428373686,"score_spread":0.326240129182456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201920784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13466796,0.0049823006,0.04578961,0.049106915,0.00043056768,0.00006246225,0.00012707773,0.000055411736,0.76477766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99081427,0.0005241066,0.0034558314,0.0007470022,0.00009412895,0.000033052544,0.000015821155,0.000025095653,0.0042907735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890725,0.007002886,0.00040814004,0.0010222187,0.0017973771,0.0006968048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564376,0.034647916,0.002005713,0.0033930016,0.002374349,0.0011414239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014455058,0.00034397075,0.0007167271,0.0018912113,0.0041437712,0.011037962,0.0013371017,0.0034246221,0.0043183994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037594073,0.00045753416,0.00057916436,0.0012771914,0.053569365,0.009007101,0.0040872972,0.004385442,0.00045269847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001947746,0.00001048467,0.000522679,0.000019355342,0.0000057358566,0.000033777116,0.002326472,0.00023615979,0.00004026232,0.99247336,0.0005494557,0.0037627954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014573453,0.00000651616,0.00033611164,0.000026779948,0.0000049096802,0.000019345467,0.0009676152,0.00027761955,0.000059368034,0.9937139,0.0045665107,0.000006750219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044264654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004599379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014455058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003748256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005717229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07644659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203634645","doi":"10.29173/mlj834","title":"Enhancing Access to Justice: Some Recent Progress in Manitoba","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.07448201269098415,"score_gpt":0.3991401640607854,"score_spread":0.32465815136980125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203634645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2974039,0.26827508,0.002078157,0.30159166,0.0024799202,0.0007135573,0.0052465023,0.00043917264,0.1217721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.642763,0.24833435,0.011703847,0.038084906,0.0004136586,0.0004674142,0.0030011933,0.0002337362,0.05499791],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632853,0.00047788722,0.00017572602,0.00028239464,0.0010994866,0.0016359491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98731357,0.001394132,0.00057837047,0.00021415052,0.007023276,0.0034764188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004498034,0.0008189736,0.00086897856,0.0040525747,0.007984013,0.0068071033,0.003986734,0.002148439,0.008720695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007850324,0.0006547066,0.00078853825,0.009292485,0.0042249905,0.0019467616,0.004531399,0.0028968002,0.00070100033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055345456,0.0011784217,0.18978097,0.009537795,0.0004290954,0.0035602346,0.029108135,0.0025922349,0.004349464,0.052187737,0.14913833,0.55758405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002007552,0.00046259977,0.48614845,0.010371361,0.000561313,0.00069415744,0.044503998,0.0012919283,0.0022530556,0.0035217782,0.44972464,0.0002659582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99342245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10645228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10645228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38278285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77236897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204210210","doi":"","title":"University Boards as Public Decision-Makers: Clarifying Representative Governance, Obligations, and Enforcement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Fredericton","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Statutory law; Enforcement; Shareholder; Stakeholder; Business; Government (linguistics); Harm; Public administration; Power (physics); Political science; Public relations; Corporate law; Institution; Law","score_opus":0.01587481139834527,"score_gpt":0.33019216922235195,"score_spread":0.31431735782400666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204210210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15760696,0.003570347,0.1944921,0.17814405,0.00096204027,0.0004049325,0.00008367282,0.00015580676,0.46458012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710428,0.000557336,0.012253707,0.0054106023,0.00020545075,0.0001419295,0.000018574006,0.000026765041,0.010342769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95136464,0.026361007,0.0023667945,0.0043729073,0.009297463,0.006237172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.906225,0.06420258,0.009172089,0.0072878315,0.010187279,0.0029252083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056722876,0.0004432996,0.00085794687,0.0018601171,0.0146039855,0.018792192,0.002863841,0.012368036,0.0031442374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090541,0.00087638164,0.0006854437,0.0017058135,0.0417077,0.016831478,0.009773528,0.011433986,0.00035966188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000559967,0.000007411909,0.0004619431,0.000009171988,0.0000026113876,0.00006165488,0.0037878233,0.00036125703,0.000043379172,0.9910635,0.0009690488,0.0032266316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044157634,0.000026368532,0.0017846565,0.00027546484,0.00004236231,0.00007720296,0.006886169,0.005210666,0.0007520323,0.91192305,0.072915554,0.0000623445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083947495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08012693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083947495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022116888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041823976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29998285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204601795","doi":"10.52497/revue-cmh.321","title":"L’approche transsystémique et l’enseignement du droit en école de commerce","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"La Revue du Centre Michel de L Hospital","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007182418025695168,"score_gpt":0.2615773172686993,"score_spread":0.2543948992430041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204601795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07807302,0.017884819,0.17148142,0.14199886,0.0014604147,0.0002804782,0.00019857782,0.00035357883,0.5882689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86136657,0.009395027,0.03782015,0.007745518,0.0004656045,0.00028365664,0.00016329534,0.00021783853,0.082542345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853308,0.008663953,0.0004535742,0.0017166004,0.002687319,0.0011476801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988739,0.0054035587,0.00071361713,0.0011863491,0.0029074303,0.0010500883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010866741,0.0006130753,0.0004979728,0.0016966503,0.008558342,0.020652015,0.0025160608,0.007159751,0.017445214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010003993,0.0004929016,0.0007675414,0.0031998313,0.019028822,0.012509617,0.008876795,0.0065707327,0.002379623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041308518,0.00006816627,0.0035952618,0.0003860958,0.000021113483,0.0005114314,0.031431697,0.0023047868,0.000871303,0.90539354,0.008099595,0.04727575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021920658,0.00009277272,0.003591922,0.00154836,0.000029901128,0.00056464237,0.054210085,0.004075881,0.0009151922,0.2315319,0.70335287,0.00006460301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03364205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0339588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03364205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016912043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017203672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122706056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206221509","doi":"","title":"Serious Play: Creativity and the Transsystemic Classroom","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Sensibility; Embodied cognition; Legal education; Pedagogy; Legal writing; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Political science; Legal research; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015049603831012963,"score_gpt":0.33147541699932676,"score_spread":0.3164258131683138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206221509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40601304,0.0038712858,0.06144698,0.03777102,0.00065761065,0.0001757659,0.000020693928,0.00038512697,0.4896584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97891337,0.00047998072,0.0054921224,0.0008197563,0.00007226476,0.00005894581,0.000009296948,0.00004597973,0.014108415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896741,0.007223935,0.00019967154,0.0008620789,0.0012041873,0.0008360438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861724,0.009057111,0.0010284062,0.0009824442,0.00037167117,0.0023879688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067298803,0.0006310958,0.00037636101,0.001352532,0.0048262305,0.015369063,0.0024768678,0.0025925399,0.007021536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014139579,0.00029390558,0.00051038706,0.00069566956,0.040030953,0.008508084,0.015397036,0.0054244422,0.00059913483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007338113,0.00028828392,0.0023923726,0.00014939686,0.000012312542,0.0008854245,0.26978245,0.00047870478,0.0016360714,0.66148585,0.0039287964,0.058886986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013956963,0.0002894847,0.0020814177,0.00034042043,0.000013833056,0.001483878,0.15533033,0.0025921823,0.0013190273,0.65695566,0.17940043,0.000053811145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001180688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020331135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015369063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031639661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049531017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035591483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207358157","doi":"","title":"BIASED IMPARTIALITY: A SURVEY OF POST-RDS CASELAW ON BIAS, RACE AND INDIGENEITY","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Jurisprudence; Judicial opinion; Political science; Sociology; Adjudication; Race (biology); Gender studies","score_opus":0.19485387012084068,"score_gpt":0.42243951402520047,"score_spread":0.22758564390435979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207358157","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39256284,0.39346743,0.0059941537,0.08037479,0.0007382926,0.00034221308,0.0016270056,0.00008361157,0.12480978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83180106,0.14767638,0.0018956488,0.012612856,0.0004841057,0.000091580514,0.0005986037,0.00007880471,0.004761029],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95106214,0.0124124875,0.0046066293,0.0033282894,0.025220392,0.0033699702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63138396,0.24083576,0.037157908,0.007983682,0.079933114,0.0027055778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07225352,0.00023499821,0.0009771325,0.019929586,0.004961685,0.008640538,0.0023426954,0.0024691042,0.0038125648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18045965,0.00063279364,0.0004704543,0.023591748,0.011109433,0.004972771,0.0027076155,0.0037427687,0.0005037078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001556505,0.000107138534,0.14329514,0.004083655,0.00013605693,0.0020054923,0.10376348,0.00042406336,0.0014210881,0.17374834,0.07075317,0.5001067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018982297,0.00013515602,0.32961628,0.015910659,0.00016050419,0.0022032515,0.068467796,0.0006297108,0.0019002818,0.017348986,0.5633766,0.00023174359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26786897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45594296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.732131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027686436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026576782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5326196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207827546","doi":"","title":"L’ABC de l’évaluation en droit: leçons de l’école primaire pour l’éducation juridique (The ABCs of Legal Pedagogy: Lessons from Primary School for Legal Education)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Grading (engineering); Legal education; Futures contract; Valuation (finance); Pedagogy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Business; Engineering; Accounting","score_opus":0.02730448999606439,"score_gpt":0.3868242388579587,"score_spread":0.3595197488618943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207827546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14933886,0.0283343,0.042914595,0.20558913,0.0036805877,0.00047805184,0.00026449116,0.00054672343,0.56885314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8804197,0.0056340666,0.018533519,0.0030724122,0.00042145068,0.00018882247,0.00008639128,0.00022742843,0.09141619],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885837,0.0072633154,0.00033164152,0.00048109578,0.0026232156,0.00071704667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98855966,0.0057948995,0.00042930216,0.00047065786,0.0033525738,0.0013928723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014505154,0.0004196557,0.0004758752,0.0016449647,0.0047666593,0.011778281,0.0010975647,0.0024337627,0.009346027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023855139,0.00043220774,0.00031941244,0.0011700123,0.0071621477,0.0054033524,0.0036538474,0.0046871137,0.0013583965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010041257,0.00038564604,0.008029456,0.00046580788,0.000018869554,0.0006783899,0.094272204,0.0016752931,0.0006587931,0.30084366,0.13625062,0.45662093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028261435,0.00012128675,0.012479316,0.00095979805,0.00000836837,0.00037187545,0.0339011,0.0016972509,0.0009514593,0.04100627,0.9084185,0.000056465255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09950497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10512395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09950497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015506042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011941834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1978516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208484215","doi":"","title":"A Better Act, More Bad Behaviour Online: Nova Scotia’s New Intimate Images and Cyber-protection Act Goes to Court","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Law; Computer security; Political science; Business; Computer science; Engineering; Geology; Aeronautics; Oceanography","score_opus":0.039144715132699716,"score_gpt":0.3442461015448713,"score_spread":0.30510138641217155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208484215","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119785435,0.004334287,0.00034272598,0.5493122,0.0053065554,0.00007889647,0.00026628943,0.000034350134,0.3205392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46825606,0.0025605916,0.0003663473,0.3409263,0.0008192712,0.000052182804,0.0001114409,0.000043101776,0.1868647],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974396,0.00042255133,0.00007538409,0.00025085142,0.0006045058,0.00120706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963039,0.0011271758,0.00022594591,0.00019505154,0.0006492374,0.0014987224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015062288,0.00024213032,0.00026388414,0.00042144812,0.01764267,0.006268809,0.0013183256,0.0070989323,0.008080285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058767768,0.00026503793,0.0003062206,0.00043349902,0.0053048255,0.0015130918,0.0029195189,0.010405298,0.0010003691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012606315,0.00014856718,0.021790093,0.00017359044,0.000028783239,0.013543203,0.044733122,0.0002679716,0.001890274,0.17297353,0.7041839,0.04014094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007425718,0.000077937686,0.061859038,0.00080089644,0.00004498092,0.0018568828,0.04857838,0.00046851687,0.00081248605,0.010118937,0.87516135,0.00014629799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8778903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9615299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12210971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018763779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032548137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24565762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208769353","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3842024","title":"Placing TWAIL Scholarship and Praxis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Scholarship; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.026849827819970074,"score_gpt":0.3519236650902188,"score_spread":0.3250738372702487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208769353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053466864,0.0033327313,0.006020615,0.21931528,0.0032755719,0.00004230892,0.00006633074,0.00022051453,0.7142598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7923792,0.00077908835,0.0021019445,0.019173088,0.0010886617,0.000042110154,0.00005298253,0.0002157495,0.18416718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856623,0.0063353647,0.00039801662,0.0016289899,0.0027306983,0.003244695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973498,0.008226667,0.001620633,0.0043761176,0.0033992236,0.008879311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013303761,0.00038583126,0.0007582888,0.0039437786,0.036191154,0.03636139,0.002925918,0.01404005,0.05200629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03505237,0.00037655476,0.00049351534,0.0033831934,0.057481203,0.027441744,0.02494369,0.015731571,0.006842203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000154942,0.000028523587,0.00069564034,0.000027135007,0.000004282083,0.00010165109,0.03230396,0.000034409983,0.00006388387,0.92985964,0.020440796,0.016424637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014732331,0.000041381805,0.00088408706,0.00034789962,0.000008252621,0.00018268908,0.0659522,0.00023048297,0.00032522783,0.55918515,0.372797,0.00003082352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01048173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02884768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05200629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013235944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026751462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17397839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208972934","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3915077","title":"Black Lives Matter: On Challenging the Soul of Legal Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; York University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Legal education; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01699605488275189,"score_gpt":0.34077244352173003,"score_spread":0.3237763886389781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208972934","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028270567,0.0037673924,0.0018096482,0.81462693,0.0018456245,0.000028069746,0.000019877267,0.000025171159,0.14960675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7503465,0.0035091874,0.0012386703,0.20352077,0.0017837898,0.00010919453,0.000025558482,0.0001876892,0.039278593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751373,0.015862264,0.0002590351,0.0013202786,0.0027595204,0.004661621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94517046,0.033157226,0.0025295047,0.0018255201,0.00527958,0.012037643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03295099,0.00061048847,0.00094858103,0.0024934665,0.046168085,0.021307487,0.0035552278,0.020514896,0.02816926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056063514,0.00043716584,0.0005852077,0.001780249,0.07220838,0.030289246,0.020296002,0.02789751,0.0024268725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035200614,0.00009963699,0.001181929,0.000053677493,0.0000080509435,0.00019204729,0.061673366,0.00006790727,0.000067961555,0.8553118,0.055258267,0.026050188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043449014,0.00004076394,0.0013658723,0.0010323916,0.000019096493,0.0001361361,0.12902737,0.00022132059,0.00029907117,0.6643052,0.20346981,0.00003952303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03364274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06028146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046168085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014225468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039382964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17426354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209019375","doi":"10.11575/prism/38766","title":"Professional ethics and law for Canadian teachers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal ethics; Professional ethics; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0492872218834372,"score_gpt":0.32619435457746593,"score_spread":0.2769071326940287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209019375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016421424,0.025152054,0.0010546934,0.12416522,0.002424082,0.000069976435,0.0003165432,0.000111821915,0.8302843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35683933,0.02158208,0.0020242382,0.013230613,0.0005207121,0.000065853754,0.00027897506,0.00013956617,0.60531867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996929,0.000454313,0.0000509833,0.00018683914,0.0013587193,0.0010201475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618995,0.00079789595,0.000118849806,0.00014100202,0.0017256985,0.0010264566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018953679,0.0004704543,0.00034912207,0.0024993382,0.024026105,0.011103929,0.000897666,0.0028799907,0.010710393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058786664,0.0003224568,0.00021052807,0.0041511552,0.013436527,0.002721728,0.0019720457,0.0044054072,0.0012561975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010942655,0.000016673563,0.0010362581,0.00010938904,0.000002670618,0.00021649212,0.043499198,0.00014092831,0.00013669053,0.5158301,0.39354736,0.04545331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023125183,0.000004267772,0.0018667149,0.00014204116,0.0000022750341,0.000087681365,0.011770153,0.000076751254,0.00004241947,0.010835746,0.9751555,0.000014188364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9859703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14659773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14659773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2256199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98982567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212243182","doi":"10.22215/etd/2018-12988","title":"Liberating Legal Education: Using Critical Feminist Pedagogy to Educate on the Problems of Oppression and Gender-Based Violence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Algonquin College","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Privilege (computing); Racism; Intersectionality; Sociology; Legislature; Feminist legal theory; Gender studies; Inequality; Critical pedagogy; Economic Justice; Political science; Legal education; Criminology; Pedagogy; Law; Feminism; Politics","score_opus":0.1282451071658718,"score_gpt":0.49765088965594695,"score_spread":0.36940578249007516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212243182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106888,0.014003227,0.093717456,0.16071674,0.0018026837,0.0005238679,0.000052285544,0.00022349606,0.62207216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9074378,0.009846757,0.02865901,0.010090341,0.00045192754,0.0005717216,0.000033417866,0.0001413675,0.04276765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958288,0.003295067,0.000051313444,0.00019148913,0.00033641668,0.00029693736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927175,0.0059556197,0.00033575186,0.0002112552,0.00024365116,0.00053619646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00888042,0.0007191998,0.00038053805,0.001622241,0.008678866,0.008087776,0.0014577417,0.0021571643,0.0047459905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006715132,0.00028327314,0.0003530311,0.0007793605,0.039083906,0.007970911,0.0072854343,0.0061215884,0.00074609043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011229032,0.00018549057,0.00057179376,0.0002031182,0.0000046318387,0.00024941482,0.27093706,0.00026869812,0.00035088952,0.67055494,0.0079337,0.048729107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029151655,0.0000748387,0.0007088607,0.0012811967,0.0000074856293,0.0002863569,0.23577519,0.00059346406,0.0009938559,0.46024865,0.29998416,0.000016830785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033792162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006386484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00888042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006403208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009149092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046964705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213281781","doi":"10.29173/mlj934","title":"The Next Great Transition in Canadian Legal Education","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Legal education; Political science; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03884332331072572,"score_gpt":0.3317381772510305,"score_spread":0.2928948539403048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213281781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095216714,0.01076126,0.0011677366,0.66762745,0.0046376763,0.00011021137,0.0009861102,0.00024869438,0.21924411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6850238,0.00842931,0.004650007,0.113951966,0.0005325482,0.00009348896,0.0009542032,0.00018528545,0.18617943],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99273163,0.00050111226,0.00009676405,0.00050741277,0.002140229,0.00402277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917527,0.00029547053,0.00013320109,0.00016036486,0.002123678,0.005534593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031612676,0.0003979503,0.0003049864,0.0017821185,0.029117448,0.009658747,0.0016753816,0.0036497253,0.017565474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055494434,0.0003684902,0.0005795537,0.0027224245,0.007896702,0.0027176489,0.0054722526,0.0059119766,0.0010079877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001162568,0.00013456015,0.016881427,0.00026080478,0.00002661463,0.0010022642,0.03856673,0.00045177806,0.0009808359,0.27841416,0.5245786,0.13858604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024845313,0.000032964766,0.034251135,0.0002589961,0.0000126293535,0.00018148543,0.03079786,0.00031107076,0.00020433367,0.0064622685,0.9273739,0.00008858096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99822503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78227556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21772441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37370607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9073288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32134077","doi":"10.29173/alr38","title":"Legal Education Reform and the Good Lawyer","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Doctrine; Legal doctrine; Law; Emphasis (telecommunications); Function (biology); Legal ethics; Legal profession; Identity (music); Political science; Legal practice; Practice of law; Legal writing; Legal research; Legal realism; Professional responsibility; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019731733776526733,"score_gpt":0.3606139686203767,"score_spread":0.34088223484384994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32134077","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028573205,0.049943075,0.0004043435,0.9097163,0.0009431361,0.0000136157205,0.000012393837,0.000015813443,0.036093917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48803028,0.07553286,0.0020081736,0.39687714,0.004656961,0.00009647327,0.000049512917,0.000047186753,0.0327015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98335844,0.009102222,0.0004391268,0.001108692,0.0040254043,0.0019660601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97522163,0.0146029955,0.0020040963,0.0011041715,0.004919371,0.002147739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012722307,0.0002931131,0.0006828139,0.0025892328,0.006376935,0.01098927,0.0016632646,0.014640557,0.0075081787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03189734,0.0003146785,0.0005893152,0.0020215905,0.031173268,0.007024224,0.0034872217,0.012922383,0.00083000713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073547,0.000099487115,0.00087523245,0.00040300912,0.00001821042,0.00007362276,0.001797754,0.000308975,0.00006436267,0.85986364,0.08715631,0.049331952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006868581,0.000072629045,0.004677368,0.002491137,0.000053228654,0.00011349653,0.005119587,0.00035061524,0.00023025599,0.30699503,0.67979807,0.000029875942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07433645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10591029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07433645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025696239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05430813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18644017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214191075","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Statutory Compilation Table","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Table (database); Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.38930601372837187,"score_gpt":0.5595117266839229,"score_spread":0.17020571295555104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214191075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076906965,0.0035492538,0.0026523708,0.010761419,0.0031650043,0.0028442233,0.2916555,0.0021335997,0.6824695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004281333,0.005983328,0.014258642,0.0035292667,0.00037895926,0.0035652488,0.11222984,0.0014748212,0.8542986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773735,0.001446145,0.0016617557,0.0010429954,0.01663204,0.0018434894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85372794,0.017581357,0.0016122508,0.005102014,0.11878282,0.0031935785],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015910693,0.001715699,0.0019422282,0.030653942,0.011977801,0.013285903,0.0050532287,0.0047460916,0.33973745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07053388,0.0025090051,0.0015822306,0.040293075,0.0034487331,0.0043728473,0.0027252547,0.005454037,0.13556746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011447175,0.000013808111,0.000100403624,0.00021573337,0.0000017796227,0.000007493149,0.00009237776,0.00004096077,0.000029791154,0.0051337914,0.9835824,0.010770011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018507766,0.0000046603277,0.0025433237,0.0004936614,0.00000972548,0.000014180698,0.00033706066,0.00007823065,0.0001412476,0.0015510018,0.9947778,0.000030702864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.960499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97494656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33973745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07923568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31628728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9417844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214750994","doi":"","title":"Does Judicial Courage Exist, and if so, is it Necessary in a Democracy?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Democracy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.12460071517531475,"score_gpt":0.40421145238675316,"score_spread":0.2796107372114384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214750994","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052127603,0.017874317,0.008272326,0.5791881,0.0023420826,0.000049471975,0.000105953986,0.00008439715,0.33995587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95985436,0.0064205267,0.0015813567,0.021013614,0.002248424,0.00006600348,0.000043004777,0.00006195204,0.008710748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776194,0.011045259,0.00093360327,0.0027262026,0.0033285017,0.0043470426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93756866,0.029947607,0.010726404,0.0052775964,0.0053645805,0.011115193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019153649,0.00028582488,0.0008309841,0.0015691709,0.0105817905,0.022466429,0.0019596415,0.008425067,0.009687653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061024148,0.00045866496,0.0006130321,0.0015772952,0.051620927,0.025253061,0.0062834946,0.009162551,0.0017317622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029926547,0.000037430735,0.0025493433,0.00013005326,0.000015341166,0.00018956652,0.0049801604,0.00009703518,0.000071932875,0.97304314,0.0071618143,0.011694303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004423675,0.00004688311,0.0041504325,0.001119336,0.000018957635,0.00027994585,0.009383373,0.00019649464,0.00017712732,0.84429145,0.14024247,0.000049316586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042899186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059946673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022466429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052133924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0106109055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10129541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215841643","doi":"10.29173/mlj863","title":"The State of Experiential Education in Canadian Law Schools","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; State (computer science); Legal education; Experiential education; Political science; Law; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.019080480932503554,"score_gpt":0.33641742050926526,"score_spread":0.31733693957676173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215841643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7362572,0.008777834,0.0011807258,0.10057437,0.00030922997,0.00015234765,0.0005402172,0.00009656684,0.15211155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902506,0.001657947,0.00041980314,0.0017070053,0.000030306355,0.000025243595,0.00008032051,0.000011329022,0.0058173863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879875,0.002117401,0.0003575536,0.00093630457,0.004514411,0.0040867757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9375005,0.016884698,0.002938556,0.002112466,0.023770988,0.016792826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013078052,0.00026496063,0.0004232434,0.0047531333,0.020901857,0.015021286,0.005015317,0.003060558,0.011303421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032901652,0.0005908365,0.00034718408,0.009386204,0.018215014,0.0034584259,0.00647992,0.0047153695,0.00023321676],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036222415,0.0008371467,0.075347595,0.0008269117,0.000047847,0.0004078202,0.09185916,0.0013055481,0.0011600754,0.40310633,0.031949934,0.39278936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012339342,0.00027300027,0.47130814,0.0026482323,0.000064709755,0.00019995616,0.19072215,0.002447643,0.0015397907,0.03018475,0.30018374,0.00030453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7804731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21952692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.405102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90523815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216130494","doi":"10.29173/mlj1023","title":"(Where is) the Tipping Point for Governmental Regulation of Canadian Lawyers? Perhaps it is in Paradise: Critically Assessing Regulation of Lawyer Involvement with Money Laundering After Canada (Attorney General) v Federation of Law Societies of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Money laundering; Paradise; Tipping point (physics); Law; Point (geometry); Political science; Russian federation; Business; History; Economic policy; Engineering","score_opus":0.03370803705853518,"score_gpt":0.28967440200453143,"score_spread":0.2559663649459962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216130494","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26259497,0.015479653,0.0029678475,0.5219023,0.0011949509,0.0005041846,0.00041792233,0.000076663164,0.19486147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9147972,0.0039198287,0.001986841,0.06591,0.00021621765,0.00016240259,0.00009841735,0.000044218217,0.012864813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9580152,0.0065142135,0.0009822916,0.0036683707,0.016437251,0.014382765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9325928,0.02625277,0.004510459,0.0015962556,0.028473437,0.006574287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030291528,0.0005221596,0.00076625263,0.0038520212,0.04728768,0.03256504,0.006036288,0.012555031,0.0036655504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09396711,0.0007062252,0.0010452942,0.0044995137,0.041073486,0.009246689,0.00723749,0.012978978,0.00023373835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012971806,0.00011921786,0.04333749,0.000657124,0.00013314333,0.0009457331,0.18487582,0.0009268578,0.0010305012,0.6462852,0.069606185,0.051953178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009970818,0.00016019108,0.09037735,0.0025850376,0.00058358646,0.00019061354,0.44824982,0.0014144933,0.002231933,0.06979374,0.38378876,0.0005248295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99008614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29926208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29926208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4516191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81275666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217669021","doi":"","title":"Copyright User Rights and Access to Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Yearbook; Economic Justice; Human rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.02967801057520295,"score_gpt":0.4065770989210985,"score_spread":0.3768990883458955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217669021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004777233,0.022570617,0.004775225,0.03245094,0.0019232414,0.000058871592,0.00013725793,0.000049236878,0.93325746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5009864,0.04078633,0.0047047082,0.020622492,0.007042424,0.00028814378,0.00026586774,0.00018110749,0.42512253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898735,0.003476655,0.000558606,0.0008781061,0.00366859,0.0015445583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99296814,0.00392443,0.000556391,0.0008311846,0.0010534158,0.00066652667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051619858,0.0003389381,0.00046283955,0.0019297593,0.0060194205,0.011627042,0.0010014976,0.006282664,0.03125289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013966567,0.00029878283,0.000399125,0.0024435483,0.029944003,0.012637581,0.0054893843,0.0043531735,0.0030576522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029253333,0.0000034466289,0.000082638355,0.000033873177,0.000001366828,0.000033281267,0.0023884566,0.0000162351,0.000023257326,0.97482455,0.014400776,0.008189211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003780467,0.000016805177,0.0007344286,0.0005822655,0.000004197798,0.00015940431,0.0025191654,0.00005194914,0.000091108996,0.34936863,0.64644736,0.000020871183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013050324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014784991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03125289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005103117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069597643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104551315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32535063","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1198","title":"Teaching Cultural Competency in Legal Clinics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05182770238714918,"score_gpt":0.45440144001984967,"score_spread":0.4025737376327005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32535063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6453896,0.004787605,0.045949668,0.139567,0.001317962,0.0013710936,0.000055859182,0.00041584266,0.16114531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94369334,0.0022707637,0.037753567,0.010893711,0.00020211242,0.0004015491,0.000025203277,0.00003898976,0.0047207526],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98648596,0.009314007,0.00027510186,0.0004831856,0.0016911761,0.001750596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96500534,0.01413127,0.0030282151,0.0013371111,0.0027424989,0.01375554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015530978,0.00031472227,0.00025640926,0.0011352343,0.0070798164,0.004302972,0.0029260712,0.0020520254,0.004439654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032293137,0.00039249333,0.00028279712,0.0006011328,0.0045894785,0.0030817634,0.010214143,0.0049761506,0.0007060862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000966652,0.0044604177,0.056591816,0.0014196776,0.000029314824,0.0027038194,0.14580916,0.001995996,0.0036948335,0.06878982,0.045735545,0.668673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043551452,0.0032194427,0.097709656,0.011753172,0.00008405781,0.016993154,0.43391538,0.010480217,0.013771441,0.14169954,0.26953533,0.00040310287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007014877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02856067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015530978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006258531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037395213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08213663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W328176430","doi":"10.1353/ils.2014.0006","title":"The Accidental Law Librarian by Anthony Aycock","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accidental; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.006504061937205967,"score_gpt":0.25178659861423647,"score_spread":0.2452825366770305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W328176430","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024547373,0.011790719,0.00028427533,0.90872693,0.06317936,0.000011094306,0.000017552044,0.000056067423,0.015688548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007961795,0.008364779,0.0005565957,0.6787447,0.02924392,0.000037328013,0.00002592102,0.00018478329,0.27488017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99071676,0.0026771897,0.00042489223,0.0014139842,0.0038362395,0.0009308745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771566,0.0077141584,0.0007116158,0.0009204812,0.005927296,0.007569889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007872807,0.0009148285,0.00097535085,0.0019372192,0.014827804,0.013009141,0.0020518857,0.01764606,0.02003957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03142617,0.0009522303,0.000688843,0.0011040878,0.0076256143,0.008468411,0.0060232757,0.03259373,0.015031083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004157431,0.0000054537345,0.000046122404,0.000015672287,0.0000018732219,0.00006114388,0.00015538519,0.000005530597,0.000014648649,0.002572505,0.99362636,0.0034911276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002567632,0.0000057793654,0.00010265912,0.000080969534,0.000002122429,0.00016948191,0.00067519094,0.000013479873,0.000038280836,0.0017127476,0.9971866,0.000010148192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012822963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036032256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02003957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006496254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01079015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06703901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3294008","doi":"10.29173/alr36","title":"Forgotten? The Role of Graduate Legal Education in the Future of the Law Faculty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Legal education; Legal profession; Graduate education; Legal research; Law; Political science; Legal writing; Legal psychology; Odds; Empirical legal studies; Graduate students; Sociology; Legal realism; Higher education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03277949819068998,"score_gpt":0.37861241550023117,"score_spread":0.3458329173095412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3294008","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02598097,0.17733619,0.00065376266,0.70455176,0.002563586,0.000017331604,0.000036389472,0.00002557969,0.08883438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7439763,0.102882475,0.00081177405,0.12578359,0.0030292254,0.000045864203,0.00007574916,0.000036501435,0.023358466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872988,0.0067505753,0.00026081974,0.00066208374,0.0031606362,0.0018670951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97911114,0.010446877,0.0016055198,0.0006209205,0.0049692355,0.0032464343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012836891,0.00016675482,0.00047532885,0.0014466661,0.005154965,0.009544904,0.0018002772,0.0063514793,0.0032465435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025038432,0.00020959612,0.0003684291,0.0016194421,0.019214021,0.0068572606,0.0030197648,0.007932461,0.00047640255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025629544,0.000050658786,0.0028703895,0.0007577604,0.000016419404,0.00014167801,0.02199111,0.00020667592,0.0001808112,0.767913,0.09974251,0.10610333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029646964,0.00006425921,0.0094870115,0.004121811,0.000035722584,0.0001679897,0.042034414,0.00012528851,0.00020019691,0.06645904,0.8772178,0.000056701632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1309726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1607022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02229056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051400326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2604205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W330098045","doi":"","title":"The Ottawa Special Services Project: A Case Study in Destabilization","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World Order","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; Demise; Law; Sociology; Ideology; Politics; Defense attorney; Capitalism; Imprisonment; Political science","score_opus":0.06860578413351978,"score_gpt":0.4314862010918542,"score_spread":0.3628804169583344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W330098045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.927902,0.0016168231,0.0005846134,0.019120762,0.000104144296,0.00029264114,0.00013637179,0.000020023333,0.050222546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878803,0.0011847356,0.0005206016,0.0018681574,0.00002471762,0.00014414187,0.00003253178,0.000016809317,0.008328088],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930328,0.0034210456,0.00015320427,0.00037252167,0.0008113167,0.0022091132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951214,0.0019081252,0.00051220227,0.00031684115,0.00064720405,0.0014940897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037403584,0.00076009496,0.0005850022,0.0024378037,0.054655224,0.0066725644,0.0027980357,0.006123492,0.0026640147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065598725,0.0007334292,0.0005688152,0.00446035,0.028937653,0.003827346,0.011871845,0.007310096,0.00023164488],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008635734,0.00017366812,0.016305676,0.0001336696,0.000016066186,0.02420841,0.87908316,0.00034273518,0.00042533377,0.060718488,0.010542941,0.007963499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001087701,0.00007078787,0.008935388,0.00020874779,0.000018105708,0.0027718935,0.92138433,0.00017816534,0.00028592203,0.002858344,0.06323316,0.000044249915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73824537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88996893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26175463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054964032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034414675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52659225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W332617879","doi":"","title":"The Legal Turn of Mind","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETC.: A Review of General Semantics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Law; Politics; Economic Justice; Political science; Government (linguistics); Rest (music); Legal profession; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025998108692801357,"score_gpt":0.3830076647904445,"score_spread":0.3570095560976432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W332617879","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025812353,0.058628835,0.00329016,0.64445835,0.008791701,0.000012394891,0.00007455078,0.000122030695,0.2820407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27531382,0.0425111,0.003343425,0.39543104,0.010677385,0.00008209029,0.00012303497,0.00038617154,0.27213198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680734,0.001476117,0.00006114403,0.000617365,0.00054755266,0.00049049733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972458,0.0014409311,0.0001331185,0.00014110624,0.00041626702,0.0006227485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029919385,0.00052952336,0.00036154094,0.001041192,0.010273201,0.010234811,0.00076847785,0.0059449766,0.010861406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005291449,0.00032124692,0.00024959445,0.0005456107,0.023818968,0.010520202,0.004579549,0.011154092,0.0032928279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008293277,0.00000766265,0.000104315404,0.000029397732,0.0000027826193,0.00006529622,0.0050901463,0.000034899724,0.00004651346,0.7449828,0.23742725,0.012200766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037491332,0.0000065073505,0.00012340737,0.00019668658,0.0000014081686,0.00012034992,0.0019952587,0.000059333313,0.00004809006,0.16098104,0.836454,0.00001014782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01616253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018072389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01616253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076528993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005538541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0555259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W336679764","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of Unified Family Courts in Maryland and California: Their Relevance for Ontario's Family Justice System","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Economic Justice; Family law; Family court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04039778599118415,"score_gpt":0.35025638453104635,"score_spread":0.3098585985398622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W336679764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96279734,0.00088084914,0.00021601748,0.001781242,0.000014608912,0.00013129013,0.0008197813,0.000012361457,0.033346474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99455535,0.00043191577,0.00033754783,0.0001490739,0.0000072765947,0.000042732103,0.00036650937,0.000005196253,0.004104388],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954855,0.00048496257,0.00017949812,0.00031164876,0.002034699,0.0015036039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98831624,0.0016441848,0.0014213467,0.00029444302,0.006383757,0.0019400096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018658263,0.00013686462,0.00031228398,0.003908386,0.010098825,0.0043963254,0.0014573219,0.0005849785,0.0031928353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012073971,0.0003062574,0.00028455644,0.009068842,0.0029800506,0.0012840084,0.0021093013,0.0007846869,0.000067842935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002220613,0.0001497895,0.6820244,0.00037534654,0.00010110628,0.0018353601,0.1454802,0.0024266178,0.0009522194,0.096615694,0.01790783,0.051909294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014113582,0.000048552312,0.8679367,0.00013055003,0.000044811488,0.00013513069,0.106033,0.0010455758,0.00015069802,0.0006625476,0.023759218,0.00003914858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98818785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10652045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10652045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.088803135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77286357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341925358","doi":"10.33137/cal.v1i1.20923","title":"Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Legal Studies Beyond Both Disciplinarity and Interdisciplinarity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Meaning (existential); Virtue; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Critical reflection; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.07251374655372697,"score_gpt":0.45224369480041626,"score_spread":0.37972994824668926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W341925358","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15708403,0.065316446,0.034319174,0.46114823,0.0014819321,0.000111774505,0.000037165137,0.00006723335,0.28043404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97470176,0.008291089,0.0049529467,0.007255252,0.0006109365,0.00008805998,0.000010054496,0.000029536592,0.004060337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869709,0.010822643,0.0001692255,0.0005331602,0.00097318034,0.0005310425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97767156,0.018280977,0.00086016004,0.0011042389,0.00077799754,0.0013050756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015249157,0.00045580836,0.00075630425,0.0043098624,0.012031098,0.020777937,0.0015025316,0.0056246347,0.0033699116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01394195,0.00028887208,0.0003996876,0.0033194432,0.08254216,0.028106194,0.014314898,0.010130053,0.00034740742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006863787,0.000029148277,0.0002959438,0.000076189935,0.0000034793666,0.00011200444,0.04201296,0.00008948741,0.00007947525,0.94763786,0.0012670052,0.00838969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008762096,0.00002484819,0.00034980796,0.00059074565,0.0000050528206,0.00007566387,0.06643975,0.00030194182,0.00012888398,0.89636725,0.035697408,0.000009795755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028383352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004847698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020777937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071870987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00975201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08064622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343959264","doi":"","title":"\"Now I See It for What It Really Is\": The Impact of Participation in an Innocence Project Practicum on Criminology Students","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Practicum; Psychology; Conviction; Criminal justice; Feeling; Imprisonment; Criminology; Coursework; Social psychology; Law; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.31672631796511247,"score_gpt":0.5795727542969988,"score_spread":0.26284643633188637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W343959264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99581784,0.00015231107,0.000091363065,0.0017333819,0.00006186369,0.00008020751,0.000019759478,0.000010946804,0.002032308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966145,0.00033571527,0.00029272996,0.0008414497,0.000037522746,0.00010943976,0.000026010142,0.000008852358,0.0017337309],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98635316,0.008380363,0.00033577523,0.0005289422,0.0015726134,0.0028290635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693878,0.0067209383,0.004102,0.0007881964,0.0020125571,0.016988445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010281278,0.00069581775,0.00088509236,0.0010597612,0.013739549,0.009041604,0.0030440195,0.0022323765,0.006264723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02166246,0.000983648,0.0007594683,0.0007333751,0.008087072,0.0024423804,0.010412681,0.006331087,0.00074561],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027103117,0.006203096,0.13339475,0.00040516345,0.00006343742,0.003324941,0.80592257,0.000110449175,0.0019631449,0.0009777374,0.0069127586,0.040450893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032933312,0.0012549107,0.05088166,0.00018502839,0.00002153546,0.0006772661,0.9360523,0.0001067143,0.00041374,0.00022393049,0.010091996,0.000057967354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011165294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036054753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013739549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048436327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0089568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054373264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W345341298","doi":"","title":"Planning and Conduct of the National Conference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.0903722199174186,"score_gpt":0.4345304889674785,"score_spread":0.34415826905005986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W345341298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012304415,0.0051787957,0.084081426,0.102281004,0.038980924,0.104530044,0.007256375,0.0020979894,0.643289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07767996,0.0062308796,0.23840547,0.037005454,0.012061873,0.15500793,0.0112537285,0.0016323425,0.46072236],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9639443,0.015479817,0.002561479,0.0030609886,0.008007288,0.0069461423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8830344,0.011664593,0.0029322307,0.003965112,0.046479702,0.051924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06609624,0.0016189173,0.0010480303,0.007554327,0.014127799,0.015391197,0.006191922,0.0059498,0.12378462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06772975,0.0016871915,0.0014231448,0.003951605,0.0031531367,0.006901576,0.011692498,0.01453644,0.041089687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041762486,0.0013585069,0.0022103717,0.0018094874,0.000026304768,0.001580192,0.006932631,0.0018522566,0.0024458207,0.054469526,0.7312103,0.195687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067887224,0.00018460736,0.0026752013,0.0009577775,0.0000066601374,0.00018246376,0.009353256,0.00054754794,0.0005369551,0.007915304,0.9775109,0.00006122469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010003289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020190487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12378462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017242309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07667099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41410083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W34545688","doi":"10.1057/9781137331021.0033","title":"Inside-Out as Law School Pedagogy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Mathematics education; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.048898311010712264,"score_gpt":0.36374127034500336,"score_spread":0.3148429593342911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W34545688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021428376,0.00666071,0.008864603,0.007828294,0.0010122797,0.00007669198,0.000023903425,0.00021105979,0.953894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43271935,0.012569157,0.008278407,0.006391343,0.0007793486,0.00031602956,0.00008347943,0.0003059672,0.5385569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988605,0.0005976328,0.00001984228,0.00014741291,0.00019946811,0.00017519046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992073,0.00038182965,0.000054616907,0.00007907439,0.00006885445,0.00020833687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011908936,0.00063888356,0.00040455727,0.0010800811,0.005872597,0.0063562905,0.001166334,0.0021713213,0.018212592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001718931,0.00021657503,0.0003048088,0.0008225509,0.0083966805,0.007278755,0.004800422,0.004284978,0.0027506668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012537243,0.00048242678,0.00091215526,0.00018946304,0.0000030398169,0.00021288866,0.102756664,0.00027533423,0.0007380873,0.66082305,0.053908825,0.17968552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000794037,0.00006374316,0.0009213416,0.0005375417,0.000003437284,0.00021756947,0.024721883,0.00026119442,0.00054065697,0.075308785,0.8974067,0.000009198069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018811381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041864384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018212592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035215023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028385362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060927153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35222582","doi":"10.21991/c9th43","title":"TWELVE PARADOXES OF JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0757601109956105,"score_gpt":0.348099049291131,"score_spread":0.27233893829552047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35222582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19897366,0.008892403,0.0929834,0.16598365,0.0010955699,0.00021677013,0.00033759917,0.00031917146,0.53119767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743283,0.0013548566,0.013497458,0.003585252,0.00053410087,0.00020542525,0.0000542183,0.0000707424,0.006369688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787385,0.010370304,0.0009921612,0.0019863786,0.006238978,0.0016737182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9296764,0.050149623,0.0037642017,0.008800907,0.005427845,0.0021810005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021264665,0.0004336003,0.001447273,0.0029668405,0.006923967,0.013317633,0.003003643,0.0073768157,0.0061614746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0826459,0.0009272785,0.0010268462,0.0044855834,0.042691387,0.022027928,0.007048938,0.011181984,0.000622598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013467245,0.000012833535,0.00015424001,0.00001634383,0.0000035177568,0.000019956,0.00074809534,0.00023852919,0.0000273822,0.995353,0.001122607,0.0022900451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001628615,0.0000031597535,0.000120603414,0.00001508589,0.0000022431793,0.000019899519,0.00046389533,0.000509569,0.00003458966,0.99632156,0.0024842585,0.000008740733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028263787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030310366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021264665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052864114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004873794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1124596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35798458","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2022.04.005","title":"What I Wish I'd Known About Legal Writing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Wish; Legal writing; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Legal research; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.033541409618777,"score_gpt":0.38645451236816786,"score_spread":0.35291310274939086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35798458","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029299867,0.013621826,0.0007994558,0.9489266,0.015593211,0.000011214676,0.00004095935,0.000025597727,0.018051254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17766006,0.032393657,0.0022625243,0.7044448,0.04182461,0.000072892886,0.00012308802,0.00010688852,0.041111458],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788461,0.012945478,0.0011256308,0.0011525657,0.0044517634,0.001478484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89483565,0.05548976,0.008100102,0.005958076,0.020199718,0.01541664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017949712,0.00039660392,0.000821766,0.0019473083,0.011548147,0.018658979,0.0015444116,0.01045666,0.015487863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12229833,0.00039753015,0.000849096,0.0015248568,0.024234336,0.025415055,0.005831462,0.024163265,0.0038500782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012246381,0.00034006342,0.009179892,0.0016002902,0.00012379824,0.0013960587,0.09470556,0.00016844284,0.0005893843,0.14631084,0.57107556,0.17438766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029333994,0.00010193198,0.0021993837,0.004495945,0.000063867694,0.0023397799,0.108202815,0.00019981652,0.0006300468,0.10779604,0.7738392,0.00010191051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044601955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008588436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018658979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005945126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013191954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094928324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37009152","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1315","title":"The Law School, the Profession, and Arthurs' Humane Professionalism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal profession; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03657544421843368,"score_gpt":0.3794238012856442,"score_spread":0.3428483570672105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37009152","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021029444,0.021717055,0.0009675141,0.6253063,0.0016323307,0.0000112075295,0.000011122721,0.000028992159,0.329296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7924602,0.009590482,0.0007094971,0.056582715,0.0020145378,0.00003456255,0.000008730658,0.00004907211,0.1385502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99310124,0.004171159,0.00010237776,0.00033438957,0.0011687933,0.0011220009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904535,0.0042472426,0.0006163254,0.0003366406,0.00069985667,0.0036465004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059328154,0.00021936443,0.00024975967,0.0014995907,0.02047858,0.011450211,0.00068184955,0.0051792706,0.01173524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009104362,0.00029981323,0.00017828372,0.000729413,0.051026903,0.0059379777,0.0057506934,0.006195743,0.0013731957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010042558,0.000056722525,0.00076854334,0.000026316235,0.0000019208921,0.000114392125,0.027435318,0.00003237057,0.000045869197,0.8724117,0.08568617,0.013410622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016101329,0.000023280722,0.002559145,0.0003414568,0.000002292837,0.0001901097,0.050191477,0.00012772481,0.00009041209,0.17318317,0.7732539,0.000020893178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044341117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090512104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044341117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010087096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011945075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08816606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W371954929","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1224","title":"The Gender Trap: Flexible Work in Corporate Legal Practice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Elite; Equity (law); Economic Justice; Work (physics); Public relations; Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Political science; Business; Law; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.10275099934079375,"score_gpt":0.39819057180694284,"score_spread":0.2954395724661491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W371954929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8022038,0.003961105,0.011160583,0.05393399,0.0003355975,0.00006465441,0.000019397172,0.0000308056,0.1282901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947595,0.0003081916,0.00043400784,0.0014621695,0.000049205053,0.000014026206,0.0000025347424,0.000009039528,0.0029613422],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844646,0.011261851,0.00021031269,0.0006951129,0.0016114343,0.0017567399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899234,0.0065863794,0.0011798146,0.000418061,0.0003646285,0.0015276439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011002954,0.00032755744,0.00042995415,0.0018004084,0.018584464,0.008767245,0.0010671996,0.0026180334,0.0038027053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011860255,0.00035794917,0.0002840033,0.0013107037,0.06485497,0.006206781,0.012509605,0.003500249,0.00029165967],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002195685,0.000025899537,0.004155918,0.0000527022,0.0000034175835,0.0005773748,0.85506934,0.000059951723,0.00030208356,0.1215671,0.001553427,0.016610779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012611761,0.00006480316,0.008178632,0.00044430757,0.0000044833987,0.0007298533,0.8450057,0.00034081208,0.00018912656,0.06080969,0.08419096,0.000029055573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0119780945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019329293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018584464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069565913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00648023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05818987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38739752","doi":"10.1093/brain/awae078","title":"Preparing Professionals as Moral Agents. Carnegie Perspectives.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Temerty Family Foundation","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.08326266207152325,"score_gpt":0.46017633129016766,"score_spread":0.37691366921864444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W38739752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053766347,0.02567335,0.0015809954,0.03924262,0.0034376301,0.00008820885,0.0007343612,0.00077053625,0.92793465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00840543,0.011127653,0.002550549,0.005195162,0.00030442624,0.00013465974,0.00027464406,0.00023120246,0.9717762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909997,0.0002581549,0.000053266416,0.000177163,0.00027818407,0.00013324335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866915,0.00022016412,0.0000788206,0.00018064633,0.0003784327,0.0004727793],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015133771,0.0014999884,0.00037003632,0.002031014,0.0036859857,0.0041715614,0.0011447322,0.0046971706,0.37075397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002618276,0.00050947815,0.00028464737,0.0011028617,0.00350879,0.0051277922,0.003438728,0.0036415723,0.11181136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029863946,0.00002318441,0.0001299613,0.00030058948,0.0000036411411,0.00013643477,0.00075487874,0.000058276815,0.00021224719,0.14201808,0.6996955,0.15663739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012150176,0.0000031299353,0.00011733789,0.00008963687,6.605747e-7,0.000038194332,0.00015999997,0.000007758842,0.000033027023,0.0026237164,0.9969229,0.0000024153048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02506114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061087843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37075397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005406451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005810774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8975431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4019421","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.198969","title":"Developmentally Appropriate Questions for Child Witnesses","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.014361733596138961,"score_gpt":0.33366031886666264,"score_spread":0.3192985852705237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4019421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5925556,0.0061717704,0.055705495,0.13107516,0.0030877737,0.002192123,0.0012001017,0.0004978697,0.2075141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94568425,0.003185634,0.028547186,0.0038858089,0.00034581922,0.00088218175,0.0003493931,0.00011629905,0.017003259],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99502546,0.0034909227,0.00036828386,0.00020109763,0.00039233497,0.00052185886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836579,0.010144905,0.0012439722,0.001155815,0.0021335322,0.0016637975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008021064,0.00030481984,0.00030281398,0.0008670337,0.004071843,0.0020391305,0.001096844,0.004001893,0.014108426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0821519,0.00030714308,0.00039370317,0.0003431328,0.0013234566,0.004431261,0.004341048,0.0034974108,0.002271907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012607896,0.0010356671,0.08900744,0.0010961664,0.00003230427,0.053498168,0.19357705,0.0006592962,0.013217446,0.11193137,0.10480867,0.4298756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014826312,0.0006703529,0.0578753,0.0038586156,0.00009461821,0.045825876,0.25841662,0.0014386129,0.02274962,0.14554721,0.46321368,0.00016114373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011470731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031058944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014108426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011189353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003463175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047197342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200435666","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-84550-6_3","title":"Transsystemic and Multilingual Contexts of Legal Education: Short Iterations on Two Dogmas of Legal Positivism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Positivism; Legal realism; Legal education; Legal formalism; Epistemology; Empirical legal studies; Legal psychology; Legal profession; Legal research; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Comparative law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.044512842723372234,"score_gpt":0.393247586877176,"score_spread":0.34873474415380373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200435666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04247213,0.016729895,0.015298081,0.051887233,0.0011561712,0.00005674061,0.000075130825,0.00007740685,0.8722472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8944167,0.006024845,0.0075777876,0.004700877,0.00048287807,0.00016315952,0.00006025715,0.00016464727,0.0864089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721485,0.0018279445,0.000061880455,0.00019440606,0.0003364043,0.00036444815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959389,0.002960005,0.0001622276,0.00027234448,0.00030275638,0.00036387425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029760015,0.00043101556,0.00034278067,0.0013691221,0.0067906105,0.012642585,0.0008787094,0.0030461648,0.010767327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003851794,0.0002835047,0.00032936552,0.0020758812,0.023661457,0.015976746,0.0077834525,0.006587821,0.00092443795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008912125,0.000020486621,0.000106747466,0.000025273726,7.5552055e-7,0.000052556148,0.014220391,0.000031589298,0.00006140587,0.97449005,0.002718553,0.008263355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013113947,0.000037486923,0.0013069425,0.00034581768,0.000006505423,0.0002101135,0.06301386,0.00049600005,0.00058145856,0.7112277,0.22274113,0.000019866158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006582359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02162389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012642585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007189525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006413838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0521639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200485336","doi":"10.37506/ijfmt.v16i1.17551","title":"Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Online Studying Cas’s Study Alasala University KAS Law School","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Quarter (Canadian coin); The Internet; Quality (philosophy); Legal education; Service (business); Higher education; Work (physics); Academic year; Empirical research; Political science; Public relations; Medical education; Business; Law; Engineering; Marketing; Computer science; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.17448260506510427,"score_gpt":0.44791004762873843,"score_spread":0.27342744256363416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200485336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951971,0.00014468185,0.000024530405,0.00069018424,0.000018772884,0.000046027686,0.00012205053,0.0000025930667,0.0037539827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99692196,0.00023764539,0.000048972848,0.0004169661,0.000028945058,0.00006677129,0.00013136084,0.0000029697344,0.0021444017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760216,0.0006431485,0.00018125222,0.00021719381,0.0006230127,0.0007331907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99041146,0.0025229175,0.0021770417,0.00031546547,0.0013843597,0.0031887419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019195763,0.00026316755,0.00039510842,0.0025729644,0.003983471,0.004956003,0.00090344844,0.0010602959,0.009765027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008820192,0.000284649,0.00043663816,0.0025721425,0.001706988,0.003007657,0.0029714408,0.0022249955,0.00092972897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049127142,0.0018048573,0.94024295,0.00008064842,0.000028578266,0.0005194208,0.045766518,0.000029263734,0.00010121416,0.0010083442,0.0027373836,0.0076317554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007076949,0.0003301017,0.76416564,0.00014865134,0.000024310513,0.00035017607,0.2263854,0.00019874416,0.00011099494,0.00014890262,0.008104421,0.000025531512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045435026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057806894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045435026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00341007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037305362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09034109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200499726","doi":"10.1080/0731129x.2021.2010360","title":"Witness Preparation before Trial in Anglo-American Law: Aims, Dangers, and Remedies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Law; Expert witness; Political science; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.14725122313458483,"score_gpt":0.47678803127215985,"score_spread":0.329536808137575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200499726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76007265,0.016518705,0.007237538,0.10864785,0.0009072735,0.00020503353,0.000029020015,0.000037452253,0.106344484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97835314,0.0062244176,0.0021076219,0.006913491,0.00016292896,0.00011173994,0.000012506613,0.0000133660915,0.0061008637],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922891,0.0057120533,0.000251812,0.00030731864,0.00061069254,0.0008289457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98031795,0.012762553,0.0024600383,0.0007414156,0.0016714401,0.0020465625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022045225,0.00022159613,0.00020038398,0.0007473849,0.009360528,0.005812449,0.0012797506,0.00236818,0.0021489288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040150788,0.0003907361,0.00013266923,0.00087386084,0.01178179,0.0044743787,0.005458071,0.0043562166,0.0002887325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014132725,0.0002441299,0.022877257,0.0005102074,0.000012385353,0.0019064003,0.6329529,0.00011685097,0.0012486065,0.19672562,0.008261589,0.13500275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030431433,0.00029124922,0.03099726,0.0032311468,0.00004621043,0.002141654,0.7524,0.000491578,0.0015721287,0.04289128,0.16581127,0.000095881536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025532218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08243943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025532218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047099614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013384963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1165877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200552522","doi":"10.3138/9781487512996-009","title":"5 What Does It Mean to Be Canadian?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.05392211297943915,"score_gpt":0.29356875831720347,"score_spread":0.2396466453377643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200552522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001765352,0.01755233,0.0002754911,0.090111144,0.0026482088,0.000015420312,0.00020641791,0.00003424625,0.8873913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08575422,0.02046816,0.00086847553,0.030205451,0.00063103635,0.00003151023,0.00019261276,0.00010866153,0.8617398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830437,0.00026326903,0.000025245656,0.00014334236,0.0005817181,0.0006820395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878496,0.00019865196,0.000038034745,0.000042484837,0.0005400069,0.00039602394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012844347,0.0005143804,0.0003278183,0.0016097518,0.014492352,0.010540145,0.0010923399,0.0051978063,0.041522436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003017711,0.00029498467,0.00028399896,0.0030731058,0.008181202,0.003735301,0.0015797091,0.0047575883,0.004240103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006854254,0.000008868677,0.00031847457,0.00006344589,0.0000024063631,0.000086892695,0.0053673466,0.00005662882,0.00003606199,0.49999273,0.47011286,0.023947468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018505548,0.0000022343252,0.00052452367,0.0001543795,0.0000025677123,0.000034890545,0.0038852475,0.000027401578,0.000026897555,0.011369793,0.9839601,0.000010159025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9606721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05669312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05669312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08105089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41133934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200627088","doi":"10.54157/tls.246477","title":"Women Lawyers for Social Causes: Professional Careers and Legal Development in Thailand","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Legal profession; Identity (music); Social change; Political science; Politics; Social activism; Sociology; Gender studies; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.06648094761425132,"score_gpt":0.3950938819470593,"score_spread":0.32861293433280797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200627088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97601026,0.0006442601,0.00019987387,0.005551934,0.000038741997,0.000016241676,0.000022149048,0.0000059887784,0.017510582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99174905,0.00061025744,0.00008568787,0.00030256744,0.000011787798,0.000007797428,0.000011196346,0.0000044960216,0.007217195],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988446,0.0004511835,0.00002888691,0.00009156232,0.0001618621,0.00042184955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748236,0.00075016916,0.0005446184,0.000035340836,0.00015927364,0.0010282994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012455027,0.00015161218,0.0001476994,0.0010115664,0.0113371825,0.0059325118,0.00048787778,0.00091682805,0.008786016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025819158,0.00026875277,0.00009443802,0.0014873906,0.004786796,0.00225454,0.0038980076,0.0017266867,0.000416454],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021049702,0.00007182379,0.045319676,0.00007589041,0.0000031650784,0.0022149591,0.92488176,0.00003834173,0.00053722406,0.007242509,0.0025289608,0.017064594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002586713,0.000022884173,0.017301636,0.00008436866,0.0000026356895,0.0004237638,0.95855117,0.00007831751,0.00010683531,0.0005445499,0.022872072,0.000009088262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030800488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08937367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030800488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005130851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007540337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0612424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205882795","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197612910.001.0001","title":"The Right to Higher Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Privilege (computing); Politics; Economic Justice; Public relations; Political science; Higher education; Institution; Sociology; Public administration; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.04083327036017959,"score_gpt":0.40542058877773923,"score_spread":0.36458731841755965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205882795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040342132,0.004232132,0.00084540097,0.0103415465,0.00083869725,0.000009337374,0.00005011575,0.000024903511,0.9832545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047355272,0.004151052,0.00089802593,0.00832979,0.0008872843,0.00004275438,0.00013764294,0.00005570333,0.93814236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989427,0.0002778407,0.000019125464,0.00010879464,0.00053645496,0.000115072675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993067,0.00028275943,0.000030454172,0.000091468835,0.00020169419,0.00008690807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007360644,0.00032164468,0.00031241679,0.0006268513,0.0024310492,0.004884919,0.0004561654,0.0018410331,0.026645692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015519336,0.00019703053,0.0001912071,0.0006673768,0.006079337,0.0033245715,0.0015744606,0.0036533598,0.008574546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002519863,0.0000068644113,0.00002581595,0.000021955186,5.8386405e-7,0.000017381202,0.0003530374,0.000054597982,0.00004360717,0.87123954,0.11931951,0.008914547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017986072,0.000004098844,0.00008139572,0.00009985042,6.242041e-7,0.00004279778,0.00017688608,0.000059292997,0.00006269855,0.1273496,0.8721178,0.0000032030325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004824073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007198151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026645692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029635713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00286636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08913869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206136761","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479803583.001.0001","title":"American Legal Education Abroad","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"New York University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Admiration; Globalization; Politics; Law; Political science; Power (physics); Legal education; Narrative; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.04108668392085554,"score_gpt":0.3232907249751698,"score_spread":0.2822040410543143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206136761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018939592,0.006158715,0.00014626083,0.009463685,0.0010074482,0.0000061832675,0.00003355319,0.000035808727,0.98125434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01440594,0.0054654176,0.00017010531,0.004318196,0.00027490925,0.000014103765,0.00004812756,0.000029393454,0.97527367],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996517,0.000070836984,0.000006386421,0.000043811742,0.00013292805,0.00009432072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997726,0.000039020884,0.000010718359,0.000021717877,0.000059868413,0.00009608704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037206477,0.00046549962,0.000210614,0.001185744,0.007086262,0.0039759087,0.00038060572,0.0015470895,0.06200801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006116218,0.00019290282,0.00016985508,0.0019112226,0.0021796664,0.0031165532,0.002452448,0.0032283326,0.015172309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007822445,0.00009101239,0.00026509253,0.000058375223,0.0000013545103,0.000120622906,0.005931345,0.00004403688,0.00016611768,0.27904135,0.6269262,0.087346636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.780912e-7,0.0000020281402,0.00016493113,0.000043048745,4.162912e-7,0.000026590322,0.0006476693,0.000009585104,0.000015687454,0.002516368,0.99657214,8.465647e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02055413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06380655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06200801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004433795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004649323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20743746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206186709","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3979034","title":"Online Legal Education in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.012542191776057136,"score_gpt":0.3401075045922228,"score_spread":0.32756531281616563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206186709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5486056,0.0069295494,0.00052315043,0.18132995,0.0014010649,0.0002882044,0.0032478704,0.00020259553,0.25747204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7917483,0.0030915749,0.00069975824,0.016592186,0.00017297162,0.00007203072,0.0007702698,0.00008151906,0.18677135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512696,0.00038407234,0.00011999949,0.0003104981,0.0012818972,0.0027764856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770304,0.0017072867,0.0006826155,0.00021987583,0.0053584473,0.015001353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021451071,0.00022116005,0.0004965386,0.002414385,0.01799177,0.007259131,0.0020727897,0.003283996,0.05365792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009497929,0.00050672505,0.00058826664,0.0041955146,0.0020608697,0.0021777018,0.0035168333,0.0044541396,0.0021911082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043820956,0.0023808132,0.1953669,0.00064387516,0.00009574267,0.002688012,0.029430637,0.0015130722,0.0007148576,0.101091646,0.36882043,0.29681584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023702015,0.00021664363,0.392315,0.001213921,0.00008458535,0.0005268048,0.065576285,0.0023093706,0.0005922778,0.0042621843,0.5325359,0.00013002875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86849743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13150258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36244318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9541225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206281372","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479803583.003.0004","title":"3. American Influences, Canadian Realities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"New York University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Political science; Section (typography); Style (visual arts); Graduate education; Sociology; History; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.07598099202203894,"score_gpt":0.29169397387309925,"score_spread":0.2157129818510603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206281372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015794188,0.0093820235,0.00020417385,0.036098406,0.00042911412,0.000010330654,0.00013741587,0.000026705216,0.93791765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6836844,0.025171667,0.00096957537,0.019507114,0.0005417029,0.000041956515,0.00020483272,0.00010739514,0.26977128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977865,0.00022171633,0.000029081883,0.00020726552,0.0010000194,0.00075544656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986369,0.00027363832,0.000075446354,0.00005758857,0.00064634,0.0003100965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014007532,0.00039616448,0.00025699785,0.0029897161,0.023762556,0.011409956,0.0009884425,0.0020792522,0.012552359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025143225,0.00022900265,0.00028936827,0.005957769,0.018908985,0.0036583429,0.0024111473,0.0036735719,0.0007170492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076218107,0.000008180348,0.00081578095,0.00003760725,0.0000024471465,0.00008066186,0.015874019,0.000068091176,0.000053095344,0.9384601,0.035422742,0.009169545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004790903,0.000003982524,0.0039834534,0.00018518533,0.000008375731,0.000079701706,0.017873997,0.00009406286,0.00007535189,0.034974772,0.94269246,0.000023878174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9791687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10302575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10302575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08043859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74750763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206408485","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3956670","title":"The Law School Research-Track Job Markets: Advice and Resources for Ph.D. and LL.M. Candidates (Presentation Slides)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Presentation (obstetrics); Track (disk drive); Law; Business; Management; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Engineering; Medicine; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.02664670022613658,"score_gpt":0.393780465023974,"score_spread":0.36713376479783744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206408485","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007582662,0.0066776923,0.015011588,0.6115276,0.02020189,0.0060869684,0.02398005,0.010602324,0.29832914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022052092,0.008615904,0.057771817,0.055169996,0.009688542,0.010881659,0.009891029,0.002883754,0.8230453],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648076,0.0012097099,0.00034426595,0.00017357778,0.0011361453,0.00065564504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93335307,0.018444214,0.0029468643,0.0027664502,0.025892,0.016597418],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020010384,0.0010871083,0.0011772268,0.0052656955,0.0051671015,0.0044607143,0.0039053818,0.007991774,0.29635283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05606276,0.0014915662,0.001022175,0.004292447,0.0009094151,0.009542236,0.0042633694,0.004810469,0.19014238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016083743,0.00007046468,0.0005205612,0.000040783503,6.4475506e-7,0.000019545438,0.000068018766,0.000028959823,0.000046476118,0.0002872806,0.9711681,0.027733145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009228921,0.00011727277,0.0075878375,0.0005678068,0.000009944059,0.000081501974,0.0025193344,0.0003974033,0.00033636676,0.0031659303,0.9850697,0.000054652282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01832787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061351325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023292734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01677974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206669746","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-87476-6_9","title":"Teaching Spanish Medical Students How to Write a Case History","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Syllabus; Subject (documents); Medical education; Medical history; Psychology; Medicine; Pedagogy; Library science; Computer science; Surgery","score_opus":0.0792050900307381,"score_gpt":0.4055338766846535,"score_spread":0.3263287866539154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206669746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049314722,0.005544545,0.00652371,0.021114685,0.0048319744,0.0000843395,0.00011756107,0.00014574158,0.95670605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043643367,0.006756555,0.013079569,0.0075160665,0.0014721069,0.00008420942,0.00023451971,0.00022573704,0.9269879],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973136,0.00010669144,0.000009787611,0.000020658219,0.00008338811,0.000048030975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991911,0.00046673053,0.000028165632,0.000029319594,0.00013613315,0.00014859943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007297835,0.0004150534,0.00019056171,0.0007143626,0.0016156319,0.002481591,0.0006080032,0.0013950432,0.048977952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020180957,0.00021358105,0.00027706564,0.00047861878,0.0013117853,0.0014888523,0.0016335595,0.00238882,0.0118176965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019011555,0.00015815043,0.0006268072,0.00023344049,0.000004869318,0.0010760466,0.0088273985,0.00032674195,0.0011603236,0.103263006,0.65439457,0.22990967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005552695,0.0000127652975,0.00039989717,0.0002159694,0.0000024118806,0.0005006489,0.0031118847,0.000099027755,0.00021764604,0.00940822,0.9860211,0.000005035441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039164005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01908401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048977952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018853865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032067893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16384757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206914033","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-84694-7_28","title":"The Witness Blanket: Responsibility Through an Ongoing Journey of Transformation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Transformative learning; Ceremony; Storytelling; Stewardship (theology); Political science; Blanket; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Pedagogy; Art; Politics; Literature; Philosophy; Narrative; Theology","score_opus":0.1073058335557445,"score_gpt":0.4086912029600432,"score_spread":0.3013853694042987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206914033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008066023,0.0073152087,0.020161595,0.10507618,0.002232875,0.00008247708,0.000030164018,0.00012721415,0.8569083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43038163,0.0058907825,0.009461613,0.016088163,0.0008815952,0.00019575213,0.000049174003,0.0005736513,0.53647757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993651,0.004068637,0.00009079066,0.00042800853,0.0012620883,0.0004995849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99334913,0.0043491786,0.00022714533,0.000542996,0.000716686,0.0008148689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008140856,0.0005717256,0.00060405093,0.0008900774,0.012702958,0.019279737,0.0018301961,0.0059279776,0.013100541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012402974,0.0004540252,0.00032035448,0.0009783012,0.04687916,0.021748725,0.0099459225,0.013789099,0.0026333705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023341672,0.000010058357,0.000035440244,0.000013537142,8.9687114e-7,0.0000682288,0.023242759,0.000048157515,0.00003841045,0.9493072,0.019415746,0.007817325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037466473,0.00001227579,0.00007114022,0.0002003702,0.0000018836488,0.00016701611,0.029865997,0.00021081488,0.00013780294,0.5012692,0.46804705,0.0000127244975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007983168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0137871215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019279737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071138497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018525442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05161482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210963208","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001462","title":"Sustainable Professionalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Practice of law; Legal profession; Skepticism; Legal education; Professional responsibility; Politics; Political science; Accountability; Law; Legal practice; Suspect; Work (physics); Public interest; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.043088990300738116,"score_gpt":0.43891631556246835,"score_spread":0.39582732526173026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210963208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034724202,0.0038812533,0.009325279,0.10557781,0.0023013104,0.00007557265,0.00008505391,0.00017258117,0.8751088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24072972,0.0058616996,0.011700021,0.056930214,0.0024888378,0.00026742733,0.00023650937,0.00042155315,0.6813641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99019027,0.0030759964,0.00025855997,0.0018161763,0.0028820848,0.0017770138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99197024,0.0012829324,0.00042728617,0.0016765713,0.0016090971,0.003033961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007935989,0.00070045807,0.0005647872,0.0014550755,0.009118103,0.011089691,0.0018117677,0.0066339476,0.051562764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010482452,0.00043679634,0.00075825735,0.00089282397,0.021208655,0.009397472,0.015252252,0.009050289,0.022357302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010800122,0.000053071723,0.00026239493,0.00006681719,0.0000047403555,0.000062423715,0.0035680246,0.00010441969,0.00022146058,0.8519661,0.115007095,0.028672542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005059603,0.000016913697,0.00017238928,0.0001581384,0.0000014032616,0.00007041221,0.0011906528,0.00010938048,0.00009992572,0.15834117,0.83982843,0.000006048966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003215211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047223475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051562764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009563987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015100962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17249459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213020685","doi":"10.1093/analys/anab045","title":"How Wrong Can You Be?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.060381239224374515,"score_gpt":0.389930906923018,"score_spread":0.3295496676986435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213020685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040012315,0.0062991227,0.036854777,0.79407406,0.0034912159,0.00009293196,0.00043085008,0.00020678426,0.11853802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87988484,0.006085009,0.0147887925,0.0701327,0.0015129417,0.00023405952,0.00025209034,0.00028654854,0.026823146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97148263,0.019445231,0.00070855865,0.0013720868,0.0053491243,0.0016423702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89731526,0.0719927,0.007032858,0.0037826453,0.017462522,0.0024140973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024988072,0.0005093737,0.0010325768,0.005136672,0.007196417,0.012604055,0.0017144448,0.004415271,0.013627641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11451193,0.00030082194,0.00077315205,0.004115785,0.017248636,0.018610798,0.0034473503,0.0072354004,0.0021270632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006179591,0.00009769223,0.012498103,0.00026417588,0.0001282444,0.00021468685,0.013081434,0.00031643413,0.00007917442,0.7903352,0.10408454,0.078838535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001368213,0.000019978952,0.0027308485,0.0009506482,0.000085608626,0.0001697445,0.033264216,0.0009360635,0.00038149086,0.86531574,0.09609196,0.00003987505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014562884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01578365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024988072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00915516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016954295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13215113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213323247","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1671543","title":"The Scientific Model of Jurisprudence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.021749604461244857,"score_gpt":0.35964170348090724,"score_spread":0.3378920990196624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213323247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010703658,0.0023820808,0.13131435,0.10951838,0.0013210964,0.00020195846,0.00017799909,0.00014722541,0.7442332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88587797,0.0017996841,0.041168228,0.011256005,0.003226639,0.0008702426,0.00013870251,0.00012289884,0.055539567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798829,0.0113907885,0.0007976543,0.0019907677,0.0050613345,0.00087650894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96995,0.020425675,0.0015018744,0.0037224144,0.003488807,0.00091123616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019380886,0.0007406796,0.0011818283,0.00551206,0.0064169625,0.012939423,0.0029176776,0.0094487285,0.010996345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030054068,0.0008315603,0.0013351853,0.0031093662,0.07133677,0.012925795,0.0043323017,0.008229888,0.0020706502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.9952255e-7,0.0000031445145,0.000013856293,0.000005040807,0.00000117776,0.000004863974,0.00014850406,0.00006784386,0.0000056477193,0.9991043,0.00031418438,0.00033055208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008784978,0.0000035201074,0.000027279779,0.00001074599,0.0000016435234,0.000012785908,0.000052317737,0.00030835735,0.000017191722,0.99483806,0.0047165067,0.0000027159006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037121733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030078627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019380886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009409247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012172808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1024971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213388798","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340088","title":"A Review of the Social Justice Function of Clinical Legal Education in Africa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Economic Justice; Social justice; Legal education; Political science; Function (biology); Thematic analysis; Legal research; Law; Sociology; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.3296623447927204,"score_gpt":0.5569728516614374,"score_spread":0.227310506868717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213388798","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025508474,0.9991197,0.000034549495,0.00024649547,0.000073798714,0.000014247442,0.000012756985,9.2398153e-7,0.0002424347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004379796,0.99518377,0.00014903984,0.00015678698,0.00004460569,0.00002528269,0.000014019816,0.0000010793306,0.000045640667],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936963,0.002894849,0.00145725,0.00044234682,0.0012620706,0.00024717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.964007,0.029753001,0.0030487503,0.00031400472,0.0024808748,0.0003963043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00889107,0.0008358788,0.0027371803,0.012006683,0.00092615845,0.0034685358,0.0010380741,0.0018233592,0.0031689361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03261382,0.0006570942,0.0017648048,0.015224682,0.0014630599,0.0029617979,0.0016724867,0.0013769417,0.00026637147],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008809761,0.000042473308,0.000861529,0.6152669,0.00078497926,0.0001738356,0.001999933,0.00018523596,0.00027322368,0.0051759123,0.0058567636,0.3692911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022921406,0.0001464618,0.004654722,0.82576865,0.0020665124,0.00065114157,0.0019721505,0.000068687696,0.00021071862,0.0011013738,0.16330804,0.000028518507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009839208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02183234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012006683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004119557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018455077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04702109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221077201","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12640","title":"Ontario family justice in “lockdown”: Early pandemic cases and professional experience","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre; Queen's University; The King's University; St. Lawrence College; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Pandemic; Criminology; Welfare; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.1236343833310927,"score_gpt":0.4305607956654292,"score_spread":0.3069264123343365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221077201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87768716,0.0027808426,0.00048202675,0.04162739,0.00032153312,0.00015065937,0.00013342069,0.00002824439,0.07678881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712326,0.001901121,0.00029782043,0.0051119328,0.00006652304,0.00003881295,0.000055781693,0.000020927313,0.021274466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650013,0.0010246007,0.00008769074,0.00019092653,0.0007882471,0.0014083217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938677,0.001935769,0.0005273759,0.00018390725,0.0010626396,0.0024226368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030834912,0.00021400077,0.00024751472,0.00069040956,0.032017224,0.0033447202,0.0016810586,0.002836186,0.005968363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009715576,0.0003761013,0.0002404289,0.0014027589,0.008588153,0.001771958,0.0049599856,0.0027920774,0.00031813388],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006113639,0.00011319383,0.0185465,0.00013282454,0.000011074926,0.015476072,0.8902779,0.00020926209,0.0006508708,0.01228772,0.04107949,0.021153878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000120531895,0.00006983469,0.028927816,0.00021507234,0.000009596608,0.0026524165,0.7448087,0.00021682888,0.00023441591,0.0011582997,0.2216476,0.00004737624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8983933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.978157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10160673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060107414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06369285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4361118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225637981","doi":"10.12795/9788447222865.045","title":"La interrelación entre teoría y práctica como base de la docencia universitaria: un ciclo de mejora perfeccionado en el área de Derecho Penal","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Editorial Universidad de Sevilla eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Derecho; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.008498048870134408,"score_gpt":0.30494989538652123,"score_spread":0.29645184651638684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225637981","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13198303,0.18750243,0.014303751,0.33837146,0.03393829,0.00024395359,0.00014667392,0.0003541041,0.29315636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7585464,0.10372282,0.0064710667,0.019746918,0.008454491,0.00022984538,0.00018368353,0.00031130365,0.10233336],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99186337,0.0040345164,0.0002571618,0.000539362,0.0026134246,0.00069218024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787805,0.014189275,0.0012158885,0.00047841994,0.003842083,0.0014938138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00808204,0.00044317177,0.00059979537,0.0025766457,0.0054603056,0.014148362,0.0012698541,0.0029721586,0.0079530515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018605087,0.00032318005,0.00033348953,0.0027602606,0.007831609,0.0044192406,0.004583664,0.004513035,0.0009797749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000127342,0.0001226561,0.009796841,0.0025550544,0.000041425526,0.0012140513,0.2064696,0.00051724166,0.001182499,0.14799772,0.17939556,0.45057997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009192076,0.00010117183,0.025968548,0.004272504,0.000040614126,0.0004827375,0.11515997,0.00042593913,0.0005333623,0.01722848,0.8357108,0.000066631204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017195428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024931297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017195428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007040559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012521008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051083088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229541775","doi":"10.1093/ageing/31.suppl_1.35","title":"Law &amp; Ethics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Age and Ageing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.19055968903387782,"score_gpt":0.4159691680008202,"score_spread":0.22540947896694236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229541775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040794145,0.0069784895,0.00089548854,0.33475757,0.0017377578,0.0000713376,0.00032320534,0.00006649599,0.6143755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.706454,0.0038642224,0.0010783426,0.08573479,0.0015127584,0.00013921631,0.00013865915,0.000092275346,0.2009857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99097,0.0065820436,0.00027386457,0.00027764752,0.000867481,0.001028977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9560679,0.027455172,0.0027676362,0.0014775782,0.0045042555,0.00772748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00499339,0.00023320588,0.00034681606,0.0010376074,0.008567192,0.0101736905,0.000935016,0.006447507,0.07395145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048627157,0.0002765605,0.0002420244,0.0011305856,0.009836058,0.00409258,0.0044025825,0.0064220782,0.0073324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010676614,0.00033838887,0.013292207,0.00024958132,0.000019970399,0.0013143241,0.04049539,0.00019543622,0.00016018175,0.29970303,0.5381673,0.10595747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031604606,0.00008397624,0.017468937,0.0007612819,0.000011662689,0.0013024538,0.057041176,0.00027123833,0.00016342718,0.13621701,0.7865957,0.00005146845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009804241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020978265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07395145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058455253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011440823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24739224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229758494","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_363","title":"Cornell University","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Psychology; History","score_opus":0.05518876873207582,"score_gpt":0.29195533339813634,"score_spread":0.23676656466606052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229758494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033346735,0.0017833355,0.00038668155,0.0039762557,0.0010271508,0.000016682267,0.0009497354,0.0003016204,0.99122506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010140556,0.00048474895,0.00017821517,0.00034101697,0.00007369536,0.000011504544,0.00022589155,0.000085508735,0.9975853],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993319,0.00005319329,0.00002409869,0.00015756593,0.00034229545,0.00009102377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922,0.00010828878,0.000026586351,0.00010852533,0.00033535121,0.00020134213],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047836587,0.0007192989,0.0005498184,0.0014628168,0.004268492,0.005418562,0.00063629186,0.0015850238,0.6079385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017019535,0.00035407903,0.00034116735,0.0016160952,0.0010528152,0.0031456326,0.0025227915,0.0022725696,0.37350258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010349517,0.00002164614,0.00019753643,0.00005397524,0.0000016143438,0.0000714597,0.0002439498,0.000045949077,0.00014706522,0.033974525,0.87199366,0.09323827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013779902,0.0000014755083,0.00012672336,0.000044059558,6.321697e-7,0.000015345939,0.0000681416,0.00001653324,0.00003458307,0.0015545487,0.9981345,0.0000020236914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041930743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1385033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39206147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003845014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045145345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55922806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230110372","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11701","title":"Designing and Evaluating Training for Discipline-Specific Peer Writing Tutors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"TUTOR; Peer tutor; Set (abstract data type); Training (meteorology); Process (computing); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Empirical research; Psychology; Writing center; Computer science; Medical education; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.24420295965868546,"score_gpt":0.5072587487999846,"score_spread":0.2630557891412991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230110372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570632,0.0007173682,0.013471702,0.0015137073,0.00011797363,0.008887115,0.00007249399,0.00023248348,0.017924005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95938224,0.00037112608,0.03451396,0.0003425903,0.00002448701,0.0030228412,0.000060044153,0.00003844262,0.0022441784],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9318762,0.052840497,0.0021412943,0.0018748556,0.006148831,0.0051181917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9236261,0.036923,0.0055988915,0.0037222714,0.016688984,0.013440627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05072371,0.0003917552,0.0007648435,0.0018752838,0.004319023,0.0049679438,0.0042464575,0.0016973047,0.0032646551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12895018,0.00042602143,0.00031348373,0.0013437215,0.0027579307,0.0032571834,0.005052529,0.0015841163,0.00061877794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008153493,0.010347193,0.07910957,0.0036128892,0.0000987134,0.0010867186,0.25367907,0.004242482,0.008973609,0.0062763956,0.005557551,0.62620056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019383079,0.019183377,0.15652245,0.0040750466,0.00042610778,0.0010316998,0.6651301,0.009832084,0.036639728,0.007174219,0.09778895,0.0002579321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00448091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014074064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05072371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012049157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026467117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26825583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230788073","doi":"10.3138/9781442682290","title":"The Scales of Success","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apex (geometry); Window (computing); Legal profession; Political science; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Medicine; Anatomy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.034945336835383436,"score_gpt":0.30168102279745657,"score_spread":0.26673568596207314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230788073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043251287,0.006428786,0.004419536,0.02128947,0.00045331698,0.000074505166,0.00031076375,0.00010151301,0.92367077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94932663,0.0032752263,0.0017116012,0.0011692505,0.00025591315,0.0001669581,0.00014934018,0.00009890383,0.04384627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521685,0.0017151049,0.0001427021,0.000466565,0.001833236,0.00062559295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99395233,0.0024818063,0.0005319387,0.00070687174,0.0011442604,0.0011827989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033499156,0.0006230524,0.0003951474,0.0030122888,0.0026194558,0.01205617,0.0006805524,0.0010145637,0.009510687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01684042,0.00023749415,0.00020709493,0.0030040117,0.021416688,0.010298692,0.0072893742,0.0022279911,0.0015542344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047538346,0.00002621834,0.0052775703,0.000060875464,0.000017655995,0.0000837385,0.019262014,0.0002856256,0.0002445013,0.87662023,0.031206988,0.06686706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020933392,0.00009643798,0.04120457,0.00026488648,0.000015232432,0.00015397934,0.032310102,0.0007410121,0.00016602283,0.59619707,0.3287687,0.000061024923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006468418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007484632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01205617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050187064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028543388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03641349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231695225","doi":"10.2307/3504707","title":"10.2307/3504707","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Morality; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.019689472480741894,"score_gpt":0.3036761265075406,"score_spread":0.28398665402679873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231695225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030068547,0.00029874925,0.00034626812,0.00029443947,0.0003409231,0.000046941597,0.00086666236,0.00059158506,0.9969138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010464459,0.00032611165,0.00045018815,0.0003916952,0.000093449395,0.000031699365,0.0012116443,0.00035394458,0.99609476],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994301,0.000050173607,0.00004594903,0.00014944613,0.00023335376,0.000090802685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800867,0.0004415756,0.00007433783,0.00035286837,0.00047548747,0.00064704975],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008354074,0.0015416272,0.0011112017,0.0023518866,0.0017240831,0.0048999367,0.001808666,0.002820867,0.9837764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021053555,0.00074636925,0.0007731454,0.0026133573,0.0017087619,0.0056491895,0.0042177904,0.001770518,0.9838553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016258421,0.00017076258,0.0004840652,0.00038580934,0.0000139884405,0.00017495285,0.00008748715,0.00015540667,0.0014493689,0.006452387,0.58343524,0.4070279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025235526,0.000033493292,0.000808006,0.00017922703,0.0000055916407,0.00019037034,0.00012245054,0.000113280206,0.00021301625,0.0011921084,0.9971028,0.000014400918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041095978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044402676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01622361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011477497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014349992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023141026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231699371","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_314","title":"Centre for Asia-Pacific Initiatives (CAPI)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Optometrists; Camargo Foundation; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Royal Academy of Engineering; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government","keywords":"Asia pacific; Geography; Political science; Environmental science; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.05120010329582189,"score_gpt":0.3344249235467145,"score_spread":0.2832248202508926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231699371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055509957,0.005017497,0.00034294176,0.010057624,0.0017877886,0.00003646165,0.00065030484,0.00021845069,0.9813339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056470875,0.0030762795,0.00090540055,0.0015003245,0.00009843357,0.000029791947,0.0002961376,0.00011119891,0.9883355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993043,0.000033782668,0.000010859055,0.0000565214,0.0003753093,0.00021924484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989754,0.00005684069,0.000029580948,0.00003930996,0.0004559514,0.0004428985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090828846,0.0005663346,0.00025836925,0.0013274918,0.005118355,0.0056802947,0.0007046974,0.001566079,0.12186628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013751056,0.00027250045,0.0002421234,0.0026165075,0.0009907811,0.0021661567,0.0028974244,0.0030623712,0.027336093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000606603,0.000010738353,0.0002014466,0.000072476105,0.0000011348199,0.00005223939,0.00050132954,0.000030996718,0.00007396205,0.041069802,0.8837188,0.07426106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.611031e-7,0.000001118029,0.0002049559,0.00003207851,5.856375e-7,0.000017921386,0.00018485803,0.0000104403225,0.000022280845,0.00059271546,0.99893075,0.0000016245475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54867905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7676099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54867905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011698273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05265027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90795773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231824297","doi":"10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosl028.pub2","title":"Legal Profession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Jurisprudence; Legal realism; Professionalization; Law; Sociology of law; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Legal pluralism; Political science; Monopolization; Sociology; Scholarship; Legal ethics; Legal education; Legal practice","score_opus":0.02940724315916582,"score_gpt":0.38592612886857025,"score_spread":0.35651888570940443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231824297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003517303,0.004310369,0.00097555335,0.02449195,0.0011561043,0.000049033624,0.00026980764,0.000058865833,0.965171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23597127,0.0121263135,0.002534421,0.025687236,0.0028850667,0.00017132232,0.0008494028,0.000104282924,0.7196707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968033,0.00080396596,0.00012419088,0.00042524523,0.0012450578,0.000598281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707377,0.00067716767,0.00025978897,0.00023123523,0.0008941286,0.0008638265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016065775,0.00027916353,0.00027849842,0.0020742647,0.004720676,0.006345361,0.0007563802,0.0025947392,0.09557989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059105423,0.00013091516,0.00023778214,0.001782735,0.00465971,0.0041313386,0.0040201694,0.0027252252,0.02278688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007232919,0.00004296184,0.0009005721,0.000110969195,0.0000019031457,0.000119886456,0.004757427,0.000051612013,0.0001590989,0.77704144,0.16270447,0.05410249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019926974,0.000007814549,0.0007129468,0.00022587889,7.437472e-7,0.00009246556,0.0016860683,0.000029823846,0.000034345438,0.030670583,0.9665344,0.0000030037454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007292325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005961572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09557989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004218862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009284758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3197466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231824399","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2008.11423916","title":"Regulating Dignity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.24912371215290088,"score_gpt":0.46441122281974523,"score_spread":0.21528751066684435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231824399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009849347,0.004629335,0.008673416,0.122638,0.0022209196,0.00016564378,0.0001065931,0.000093333816,0.8516235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4618934,0.0033095153,0.008012607,0.17411792,0.0030567595,0.0006133602,0.00013446267,0.00015957242,0.34870237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97996855,0.0059580198,0.0011395488,0.0037309232,0.006516132,0.0026867348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98624206,0.008190803,0.0007780442,0.0018040333,0.002198258,0.00078677654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015164554,0.00071520894,0.000912999,0.001771478,0.008051953,0.012456361,0.0034204083,0.031244198,0.012803482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030281741,0.0007869239,0.0011347272,0.00078242115,0.031532258,0.006729179,0.008321644,0.022809885,0.0032933205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062529843,0.00001907097,0.00011538203,0.000023432518,0.0000063978396,0.00007092465,0.0012048898,0.00006044649,0.00021872077,0.9827974,0.0111143235,0.0043627876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032531974,0.000042704687,0.0005877895,0.00046238428,0.00003727736,0.00021071141,0.0011439805,0.00030772397,0.0012674768,0.6935465,0.30231217,0.000048753816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011078762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01488535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031244198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074867182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011819296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080198765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231885791","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4263","title":"‘Writing separately’","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Political science; Law; Concurrence; Variety (cybernetics); First amendment; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.04536705882565019,"score_gpt":0.3641999661543541,"score_spread":0.31883290732870395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231885791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008700209,0.0026800917,0.030051937,0.08415237,0.056569945,0.00016530795,0.00031692864,0.0008566063,0.8165066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13104025,0.0017436105,0.020398762,0.0506992,0.015880471,0.00025038826,0.00049403403,0.0014260585,0.77806723],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864139,0.0052728374,0.00097154273,0.0019597984,0.004026349,0.0013554972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753092,0.009716239,0.0015580141,0.004791064,0.0057363464,0.0028892395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008155852,0.00075605843,0.0005632033,0.0011298917,0.0054798205,0.006529626,0.0012890557,0.0034150013,0.077828616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046202566,0.00041829798,0.0005849275,0.0010897424,0.00488577,0.0069617513,0.007410323,0.008324961,0.0528793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059529517,0.00004067714,0.0005136022,0.00020201775,0.000018575603,0.0005042489,0.019518802,0.00007863309,0.0015663708,0.29337877,0.5651353,0.11898345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050505164,0.000018425457,0.000249317,0.00010767352,0.000005732254,0.00027477415,0.0018907,0.000079252386,0.0005107073,0.017754817,0.9790856,0.000017977345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013761452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029819172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077828616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017766249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045262356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26036268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232100061","doi":"10.7202/1055473ar","title":"Liberal Education, Entrepreneurship, and the Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theatre Research in Canada","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Law; Political science; Legal education; Liberal education; Sociology; Higher education; Liberal arts education","score_opus":0.052682465448944275,"score_gpt":0.40817723820248186,"score_spread":0.3554947727535376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232100061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40636858,0.01290808,0.0014448947,0.19901279,0.0005063293,0.0001464263,0.0003287861,0.00009105908,0.37919307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93062633,0.003242618,0.00050833414,0.0035303524,0.00007406901,0.000027511172,0.000059326452,0.000024822222,0.061906546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935489,0.0011842288,0.000096280775,0.00029231835,0.0011737635,0.0037045372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789219,0.0063021746,0.0007600021,0.00037621634,0.0027365491,0.010903147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046552448,0.00029641035,0.00059553393,0.0030295395,0.030896306,0.014951777,0.0018016368,0.003741931,0.017092936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012956145,0.0003229463,0.00029290246,0.006029397,0.031490326,0.003023741,0.0055350284,0.0072115455,0.00050121156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011377231,0.00030071073,0.01917958,0.00016757485,0.00001561434,0.0006044417,0.04199528,0.000939576,0.0002628768,0.79055905,0.040315013,0.1055464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013568609,0.00012395653,0.11822863,0.0010110253,0.00004008537,0.00025595166,0.18927889,0.0022073672,0.00089579134,0.12536183,0.5623151,0.00014572314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14632085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14632085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40956602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232384133","doi":"10.1177/229255030201000502","title":"Doctors and Lawyers are Different","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Plastic Surgery","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Medical physics","score_opus":0.07612676150925364,"score_gpt":0.28698209329221136,"score_spread":0.21085533178295773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232384133","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1268595,0.006823503,0.0012656469,0.62435853,0.0048038815,0.0000688569,0.00022343636,0.000066697925,0.23552999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82958513,0.002933453,0.0005059237,0.12886977,0.0012654687,0.00007314766,0.00014667217,0.00006444716,0.036555946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97660065,0.008344835,0.00053144846,0.0011984402,0.0076838797,0.0056407438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97196835,0.008576862,0.0020889798,0.00078065245,0.004753793,0.011831267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008674817,0.0003381636,0.0009070025,0.003353552,0.0086600715,0.013183963,0.0014268863,0.008965727,0.024786796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04081411,0.0007285852,0.0005739489,0.001930982,0.018597282,0.012318381,0.005461046,0.008163299,0.0040632295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004289953,0.0005529079,0.030622547,0.0003183277,0.00017984855,0.0012760747,0.13996616,0.00017143249,0.0009028424,0.511192,0.22538345,0.0890054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050427334,0.00013545481,0.04891412,0.0009240102,0.00014078332,0.0011061295,0.26372185,0.00022178593,0.0005702654,0.30999812,0.3735086,0.0002546241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029465927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05759669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029465927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076127504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009866379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082920134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233369333","doi":"10.26226/morressier.5885d713d462b8028d8924d2","title":"Evaluation of a Court Liaison and Diversion Service in London over a Quarter of a Century","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Service (business); Law; Political science; History; Business; Archaeology; Marketing","score_opus":0.09391309181875272,"score_gpt":0.4316643544190195,"score_spread":0.3377512626002668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233369333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92625713,0.0013634176,0.00039186538,0.017295841,0.00024600181,0.00045906316,0.0011010021,0.000055370918,0.052830275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93808776,0.0008165787,0.00049423607,0.0024113392,0.00008765336,0.00013931711,0.00070734904,0.000053760315,0.057202026],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99102646,0.0023836223,0.00063565164,0.00054922217,0.0038147212,0.0015901926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97604907,0.004851444,0.0023331868,0.0006952637,0.009780877,0.0062902123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048527434,0.0002961129,0.0004523689,0.0020315633,0.0052742143,0.005483426,0.001191978,0.0032101688,0.009085922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02020164,0.00051445665,0.0003570113,0.0020166996,0.0029185226,0.0021920947,0.004411022,0.0027267986,0.0012143672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0054935087,0.0029140073,0.24226892,0.0031861328,0.0007184153,0.04237933,0.17074557,0.016490912,0.01758376,0.052253865,0.12651862,0.31944698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005396782,0.0037520623,0.47186977,0.0013940769,0.0002657708,0.0032719579,0.22248948,0.0046431464,0.004552239,0.0022688562,0.28468242,0.00027046064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2512825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43005618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2512825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03342158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034052335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49963975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234984341","doi":"10.1002/9781118929803.ewac0462","title":"Sexual Discrimination in the Legal Profession","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Women and Crime","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationality; Covert; Ethnic group; Legal profession; Political science; Law; Sexual discrimination; Phenomenon; Gender studies; Criminology; Sociology; Immigration","score_opus":0.02294291360434003,"score_gpt":0.3512204581601392,"score_spread":0.32827754455579916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234984341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032264903,0.12686522,0.0005284661,0.058647398,0.0033056596,0.00003533732,0.0002822938,0.000043102886,0.7780276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45494574,0.21477275,0.0006721183,0.03458113,0.004621673,0.000054712364,0.0003878994,0.00005812643,0.28990594],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988398,0.00040454316,0.000052172072,0.00009808616,0.00040447738,0.00020095844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998965,0.0003851665,0.00018394252,0.00007871293,0.00013722229,0.00024992286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007009603,0.00014276608,0.00019170475,0.0012240356,0.0023387023,0.0032654682,0.00026715046,0.0012437475,0.02334255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031901817,0.000077884324,0.00013316581,0.0019810165,0.0045140614,0.0016490481,0.0027011635,0.0016575119,0.0028312665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023563925,0.00009348304,0.0073437677,0.000697775,0.0000063414423,0.0008148512,0.018563526,0.00008142469,0.00033512732,0.2218263,0.1861895,0.56402427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003139768,0.00003427791,0.0047706068,0.0016095946,0.0000030021051,0.0015713047,0.007377457,0.000028608709,0.00013758187,0.021536887,0.9629179,0.000009617499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004596586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006761523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02334255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001271393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027390213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07808858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235480865","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-947-2.ch132","title":"Courts on the Web in Russia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Electronic Government","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Skepticism; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.02764223749378327,"score_gpt":0.2923313720353034,"score_spread":0.26468913454152015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235480865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26035392,0.026881672,0.0013981184,0.03601935,0.0006274576,0.000035011457,0.00091037585,0.00020348643,0.67357063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94822156,0.014029831,0.0005300115,0.0028584327,0.0003754869,0.000028764836,0.00060995686,0.000060659895,0.033285324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986707,0.0005239965,0.00007983323,0.0001778914,0.0003632679,0.00018429247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982217,0.0006272736,0.0004513134,0.00011503251,0.00017763818,0.0004069876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067846006,0.00007623322,0.00021426557,0.0022118315,0.0024664374,0.007255998,0.00041705728,0.0013936961,0.014097811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029860367,0.00016995017,0.00018332586,0.0038053272,0.0019105315,0.0048671104,0.0034944988,0.0015220229,0.0027168568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009962902,0.00027495562,0.07866768,0.0006612738,0.000057917292,0.0064643184,0.047123913,0.00036253774,0.0019321558,0.4328235,0.12349326,0.30803877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013462982,0.00003687849,0.08667445,0.0007947994,0.00003259075,0.0024305985,0.020584546,0.0004729576,0.00034600205,0.021562546,0.8670238,0.000027301967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011018299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009230318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014097811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024224482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017812585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047161877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235664638","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500011550","title":"Welcome Message of the Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, P.C., Chief Justice of Canada: International Association of Law Librarians Conference - October 1, 2012 - Toronto, Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Association (psychology); Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.013077344118704938,"score_gpt":0.27356107550085756,"score_spread":0.26048373138215264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235664638","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000556012,0.004219256,0.0003581847,0.570061,0.3407391,0.0002631354,0.0008876628,0.00066909473,0.0822465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028830369,0.0019565015,0.00035279852,0.16207965,0.05476649,0.00016882711,0.0004561281,0.0003978824,0.7769386],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954652,0.0004181762,0.00014147897,0.00042284228,0.0027620748,0.0007902514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97387606,0.001585685,0.00058619335,0.0004932754,0.012348231,0.011110605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003238151,0.0011682248,0.0011652985,0.0013359434,0.006302847,0.0084527945,0.0016134061,0.012658988,0.2355174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022649353,0.0007792951,0.00095238816,0.00074117776,0.0017133199,0.0040167035,0.004843343,0.012620883,0.14720291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009622388,0.0000042356705,0.000021511165,0.0000120144,6.295924e-7,0.000027788443,0.000018611125,0.000002348563,0.00002780297,0.00007228488,0.99875367,0.0010494018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001521008,0.00001330099,0.0003332689,0.00005667341,0.0000019800195,0.00005299335,0.0002451362,0.000012607184,0.000040818104,0.00014134943,0.999074,0.000012714037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038136832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12501287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96186316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050302627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009966838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7878842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235839321","doi":"10.1002/9781118968888.index","title":"Index","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09824020529357748,"score_gpt":0.4821947478352278,"score_spread":0.38395454254165035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235839321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025062406,0.0002442311,0.00030003575,0.0006491025,0.0006547378,0.000081198115,0.0036642863,0.00038491716,0.9937708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013213177,0.0002773645,0.0002280968,0.0002663019,0.00026171064,0.000038715243,0.0023537858,0.00025661517,0.9949962],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988741,0.00012236756,0.00007190928,0.00015864287,0.00062104623,0.00015187987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997569,0.00039659056,0.000120141936,0.00032541752,0.0009923212,0.0005966253],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066629547,0.0009630906,0.00062701234,0.0058907755,0.0027991736,0.008737513,0.001070442,0.0016422677,0.81973064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005130734,0.00032335447,0.00043416026,0.0060177776,0.0011211295,0.0066279857,0.0033491736,0.0014164634,0.627594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014551464,0.00002591127,0.00023946428,0.00010872036,0.0000012901396,0.000034570094,0.00012415285,0.000024476678,0.00012192371,0.014117551,0.92117155,0.064015694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001979601,0.0000039416027,0.00035923836,0.000044210028,5.84658e-7,0.000022833503,0.00008522323,0.000018304783,0.000039286166,0.0010206683,0.99840194,0.0000018514487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066167153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01619054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18026936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031122952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040590176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235996708","doi":"10.1350/pojo.2010.83.1.488","title":"Suing Detectives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Intervention (counseling); Position (finance); Law; Political science; Criminology; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.05324434837645715,"score_gpt":0.4050540569927925,"score_spread":0.35180970861633537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235996708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31892544,0.0073180073,0.0066070645,0.2199175,0.007360458,0.00036684793,0.0003022524,0.0002569059,0.43894547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79620093,0.0035202368,0.0014339407,0.06534392,0.0017863773,0.00009728379,0.000116367504,0.00004920159,0.13145171],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946871,0.00090377236,0.00025404774,0.0006097878,0.0015578882,0.001987468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930146,0.002169035,0.001524721,0.00046462243,0.0009347854,0.0018921996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038913444,0.00037847154,0.00051460456,0.00085079425,0.007240917,0.0032903512,0.0011016678,0.0061342474,0.011291747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028276604,0.00043922427,0.00045285944,0.00034760503,0.0043533947,0.0022278086,0.0044709323,0.0060854745,0.002357022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013822329,0.00038162526,0.09907815,0.0005356795,0.000093294846,0.015032143,0.064059466,0.00024558528,0.0045870496,0.22187406,0.3370272,0.25694758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038992002,0.00071290566,0.043508746,0.0009121829,0.00008043558,0.013988819,0.03027057,0.0004321322,0.0019721028,0.024280442,0.8836979,0.00010467832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012091411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022868782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012091411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016606371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004235491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037774622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236122237","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.142","title":"Becoming an Ethical Scholarly Writer","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Identity (music); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Socialization; Ethical code; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Computer science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08999703686101351,"score_gpt":0.41159696758955183,"score_spread":0.3215999307285383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236122237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036719844,0.011596888,0.052202214,0.43608615,0.021551186,0.00021988254,0.00002577797,0.0002617378,0.4413363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61941725,0.012520843,0.065131344,0.070745416,0.010196167,0.0005280463,0.00005207034,0.0002244676,0.22118443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9685533,0.020734774,0.0010871012,0.0013315986,0.0068473746,0.00144594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618106,0.017051432,0.004322479,0.0022057598,0.006496575,0.008113194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022492567,0.0005246431,0.00070552825,0.0020202259,0.013619792,0.028275726,0.0015151115,0.007990055,0.0049912063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035928477,0.00036703874,0.0006488146,0.0008113764,0.024358543,0.015504019,0.009580239,0.014608049,0.0025028358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018687964,0.00008887143,0.0012732751,0.00015639483,0.0000073780743,0.001752774,0.12804867,0.00013835084,0.00073857623,0.79033494,0.03921931,0.038222797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010611817,0.00008540347,0.0004819732,0.00067883736,0.000012059584,0.0058408766,0.118913606,0.00051755586,0.00047527603,0.17383397,0.69909483,0.000055004653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000514975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011256551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99200994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035552515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009884115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118953526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236313526","doi":"10.29173/alr227","title":"Forty Years of the Alberta Law Reform Institute &amp;mdash; Past, Present, Future","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Join (topology); Law; Political science; Law reform; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04186230200847783,"score_gpt":0.3718299820779953,"score_spread":0.32996768006951743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236313526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00675005,0.036236852,0.00078001874,0.71824014,0.013058772,0.000033627228,0.00027828122,0.0001966967,0.22442569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.094129704,0.012154685,0.0013127379,0.13544783,0.0030940608,0.000034912908,0.00025149353,0.00008459304,0.7534899],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99506456,0.00052196847,0.00005678959,0.00027604375,0.002401971,0.0016786876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99186945,0.00072987477,0.00020363757,0.00025387807,0.0027453713,0.0041977763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037398306,0.00029698428,0.00027881272,0.0013284177,0.014248891,0.010707756,0.0012943242,0.0051768734,0.025700549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051848805,0.00036070094,0.00029324586,0.0018032737,0.008445164,0.0025968442,0.0027374404,0.006318046,0.0036802376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015627515,0.000030499416,0.0019530456,0.00005092623,0.000005084846,0.000063982734,0.0012504093,0.000063323554,0.00014339008,0.051388923,0.9052336,0.039801273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034994732,0.0000057688194,0.0033459088,0.00005396275,0.0000034410489,0.000014132013,0.0014379079,0.000021053907,0.000056391666,0.0015393206,0.9935063,0.000012212406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8164482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95032626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040956922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0917914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3692655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236686839","doi":"10.2307/3504589","title":"10.2307/3504589","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Morality; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.019446056403923943,"score_gpt":0.3028405750570526,"score_spread":0.28339451865312865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236686839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032624698,0.0003244638,0.0003379467,0.00028309843,0.00034737057,0.00004525697,0.000694409,0.00051416835,0.997127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011004925,0.00034742377,0.00044380996,0.00039755937,0.00009380473,0.00003012125,0.0010024961,0.0003149777,0.9962692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994235,0.00004682568,0.000045193927,0.0001551024,0.00023473742,0.00009476889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980324,0.0004351201,0.0000743947,0.00032368823,0.0004904169,0.00064403063],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083734246,0.0015862279,0.0011030108,0.002249725,0.0017180566,0.0046827113,0.0017514953,0.0027784016,0.98331785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020418074,0.0007538871,0.00076016114,0.002446216,0.0016989075,0.005516165,0.004160853,0.0017193403,0.98285013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017581154,0.00018167892,0.0005238539,0.00041100435,0.0000148810195,0.00019021293,0.000096434116,0.00015942282,0.0016019406,0.0064636627,0.5662743,0.42390692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026161584,0.000036979447,0.000900215,0.0001859911,0.0000062755175,0.00022466689,0.00013481961,0.00011962915,0.00022069304,0.0011762787,0.9969535,0.0000147853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004134836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045472058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016682148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011149229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013765543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023794949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237098895","doi":"10.1017/9780511782480.033","title":"XXVII","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Instinct; Quarter (Canadian coin); Art; Art history; History; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0437567250794966,"score_gpt":0.4214230692774201,"score_spread":0.37766634419792355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237098895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038353284,0.0006036248,0.00018672219,0.0042870315,0.0016965366,0.000044496395,0.00057155464,0.00009442931,0.9921321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016218774,0.00020679546,0.0000460872,0.0011181177,0.00022535013,0.000026673988,0.00016482787,0.00004751712,0.9965429],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904233,0.0001538204,0.000041286643,0.00014524725,0.000407803,0.00020942948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867487,0.00016130946,0.00006362454,0.00012369701,0.0006525522,0.00032401775],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008336175,0.0005083263,0.0002676527,0.0010379985,0.003865405,0.006849452,0.0007964066,0.0023535632,0.50505465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039240853,0.00020189812,0.0003418418,0.0012890722,0.0011701187,0.0027995915,0.002852183,0.002406905,0.3685329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000124374865,0.000019756917,0.0003746818,0.0000616499,0.0000013151428,0.00008029675,0.0005853519,0.000021458492,0.00015902986,0.038311858,0.93083006,0.029542083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010587318,0.0000027520848,0.0003556541,0.000047659156,3.2738293e-7,0.000028967066,0.00027438352,0.000010313859,0.000032454973,0.0006558252,0.998589,0.0000016423563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017124776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024459297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49494535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027431755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038264915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237512605","doi":"10.17118/11143/11825","title":"Revue de droit. Université de Sherbrooke. Volume 37 - Numéro 1","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.013913433986965784,"score_gpt":0.24747769324877442,"score_spread":0.23356425926180863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237512605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029238716,0.24666528,0.00092148327,0.047870047,0.012646445,0.000073597446,0.0064409613,0.00040240845,0.68205583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012572125,0.03367169,0.0003656548,0.0012374496,0.00068168563,0.00005610536,0.0009894868,0.00021347625,0.95021236],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983512,0.00027823524,0.0001319968,0.00027984605,0.0006971365,0.00026150976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865603,0.00034482437,0.00015706896,0.00016798956,0.00041884897,0.0002552714],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015071271,0.0012528015,0.0010028601,0.0030049656,0.0024444761,0.0065961527,0.0012007287,0.0030060816,0.35286823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041212356,0.00050636264,0.00037173647,0.0056741866,0.0018955582,0.0048851646,0.0032052426,0.0024530292,0.105527766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089592024,0.000021344034,0.00038938032,0.0006509669,0.00000638742,0.00010385812,0.0008801158,0.00009101339,0.00023848569,0.0330726,0.8442794,0.1201768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030100045,0.0000033318222,0.0005421593,0.00016205487,8.695938e-7,0.000031246323,0.00017600623,0.0000086092095,0.000059522295,0.00037839383,0.99863225,0.0000025306879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10005205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13223217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35286823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013724754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0091838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92305493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238836132","doi":"10.22215/etd/2000-04553","title":"Restorative injustice? The boundaries of restorative justice at the intersections of gender, race and class, a Canadian focus.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Injustice; Race (biology); Class (philosophy); Criminology; Environmental justice; Gender studies; Focus (optics); Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.0454704338678897,"score_gpt":0.3790856291582946,"score_spread":0.3336151952904049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238836132","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076460585,0.15885523,0.0024269628,0.4791796,0.0011898858,0.00010208905,0.00028422519,0.000035591842,0.28146586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87839454,0.074581385,0.0019876596,0.013414873,0.00061985094,0.00007760169,0.0000875747,0.000067435336,0.030769097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954325,0.0013149317,0.0000909668,0.0003232924,0.0011920715,0.0016462137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933216,0.0018622796,0.0003938656,0.00024121751,0.0024237477,0.0017572972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065830452,0.0005147591,0.0008249985,0.003845429,0.027667938,0.013792004,0.0024181262,0.0036062389,0.005926292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013475045,0.00044992726,0.0005007493,0.0045032743,0.055352986,0.0080857985,0.00519861,0.0065346044,0.00027887625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006279473,0.00009784542,0.0066671413,0.0002568513,0.000024326795,0.00024232127,0.116999015,0.00029953735,0.00025090194,0.75304556,0.043651666,0.0784021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033407516,0.00003930583,0.07708338,0.0030797191,0.0001476344,0.00033651126,0.45473024,0.00052030094,0.00042152533,0.21816128,0.24534033,0.000106399464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96412903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98821133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091979735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091979735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2087337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6673628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239021314","doi":"10.1002/asi.20902","title":"The law of libraries and archives","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Citation; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; History","score_opus":0.02269206996373028,"score_gpt":0.32537037233510224,"score_spread":0.30267830237137194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239021314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009697478,0.007358926,0.0048102424,0.13184728,0.0009921588,0.00003444142,0.00015491627,0.000106151296,0.84499836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66049206,0.0037779803,0.0033427428,0.043747567,0.0048108026,0.00021376746,0.00010982451,0.00018543433,0.28331983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872133,0.006029504,0.00069164246,0.0016709511,0.0029918759,0.0014026974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843463,0.009184963,0.0009935192,0.0024095802,0.0020302266,0.001035376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009467653,0.00033558952,0.0008392948,0.0023525446,0.01626003,0.028723782,0.0022292933,0.018006762,0.01779873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028146883,0.0010262453,0.0007595211,0.003091615,0.044737663,0.019190205,0.0063353186,0.013565262,0.003190822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036967963,0.0000049777964,0.000075983044,0.0000055514647,0.0000013438761,0.0000115095745,0.00042317298,0.000022540347,0.000009395345,0.99179256,0.0065790405,0.0010703097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029717514,0.000011983875,0.00039503767,0.0001507865,0.000015123042,0.0000689956,0.0011957061,0.00021254977,0.00014957342,0.71324396,0.2844978,0.000028811388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029756589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02992365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029756589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010173254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014450772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073812425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239564217","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-933-5.ch151","title":"Knowledge Sharing in Legal Practice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Knowledge management; Business; Knowledge sharing; Legal practice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.06672729024993052,"score_gpt":0.3850507781667672,"score_spread":0.3183234879168367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239564217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014737664,0.012229987,0.016550606,0.013339864,0.00031580604,0.0000557585,0.00001539946,0.00003846909,0.94271636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8317579,0.015832076,0.009868037,0.0023416535,0.00065741723,0.00021844206,0.00005109914,0.000062763,0.13921069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944265,0.0033004335,0.00017003196,0.0004964884,0.0010983727,0.0005082931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960299,0.002549469,0.00028874114,0.0005975905,0.00024406723,0.00029011685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045352895,0.00044334144,0.0003989211,0.0018878506,0.0059933006,0.01116828,0.0014895621,0.005327319,0.011441459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056892266,0.00029557166,0.00039696458,0.0030760118,0.019722585,0.015860671,0.009770862,0.003224908,0.0016956321],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033676513,0.000019546844,0.000094668736,0.00007077687,0.0000025854238,0.00010680538,0.012629441,0.00028447722,0.00007559926,0.95744133,0.0027407669,0.026530629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005354088,0.000020731644,0.00025491032,0.00048485622,0.0000040881387,0.00027480777,0.007885256,0.0005890576,0.00018187745,0.8059512,0.18433641,0.000011575888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030741799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022767317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011441459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063894405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063251415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046358824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239632767","doi":"10.1353/ctr.0.0022","title":"\"My Passion, My World\": An Interview with Derrick Chua","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; Art; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04710449569946656,"score_gpt":0.36548456116280936,"score_spread":0.3183800654633428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239632767","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016510382,0.045386735,0.00034552053,0.90842587,0.0038158728,0.00014842581,0.00006996291,0.000023200018,0.025274016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23371203,0.07058648,0.0008558576,0.61876863,0.0020065422,0.0006342519,0.000120780416,0.00012615835,0.073189296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97647196,0.013801974,0.0006036111,0.0010234806,0.0046291086,0.0034699796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96452945,0.01804099,0.001603788,0.00051037874,0.009993938,0.0053215185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02403095,0.0004919314,0.0015112817,0.0027959729,0.02615472,0.009631888,0.0025064347,0.009012666,0.0035808997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04229795,0.0011000402,0.0004891155,0.0038785327,0.012809432,0.006880405,0.004959646,0.022226635,0.0006356872],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039231036,0.000041706455,0.001097887,0.00048185862,0.000020827221,0.0014453166,0.20741847,0.000070918555,0.0004638127,0.02395961,0.7458431,0.019117257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000100899715,0.000028854613,0.0022191158,0.0008657883,0.000015702846,0.00043066996,0.16955557,0.000032275104,0.0001778518,0.0007280833,0.82588905,0.000046925437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5215545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6829261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5215545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04418131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07177119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96252626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239760779","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_352","title":"Colt Foundation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05329014870948413,"score_gpt":0.3412449433596988,"score_spread":0.2879547946502147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239760779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049493025,0.0043168315,0.0007027551,0.014274049,0.0032397842,0.000035355333,0.0017581943,0.00046858157,0.97470945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015735952,0.00094000367,0.00033315204,0.0009974694,0.00009466279,0.000010956916,0.000352181,0.00016279436,0.99553514],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983677,0.0000952778,0.000032138552,0.0002239369,0.0010348536,0.00024607303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972046,0.00022848757,0.000066524626,0.00016287339,0.0014637554,0.0008736903],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087598426,0.0005528263,0.0003950218,0.0019255063,0.003493481,0.005740882,0.0010660395,0.0024450656,0.5449653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037710562,0.00034273244,0.0003801472,0.0015225208,0.001011234,0.0015413668,0.001970496,0.0024619014,0.20236701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017180077,0.0000126474915,0.00015596664,0.000061087485,0.0000019400513,0.00011330929,0.00012402365,0.000047825273,0.000077771765,0.020777702,0.8935825,0.08502798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017889924,0.0000015973509,0.00009420112,0.000042052794,7.648489e-7,0.000041091458,0.000040710172,0.000014892988,0.000022776092,0.0005502461,0.999188,0.0000018059216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21611631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5018586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5449653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008894276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019082444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6490517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239885959","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_338","title":"City University, London","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Optometrists; Camargo Foundation; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Royal Academy of Engineering; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.04856272742491469,"score_gpt":0.3069093253292261,"score_spread":0.2583465979043114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239885959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007124762,0.020939518,0.0007255571,0.004012513,0.0014267727,0.000032950018,0.0032431968,0.00021185461,0.9686952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020792584,0.004496352,0.00042375873,0.00024424813,0.00004093483,0.000020097828,0.0006173066,0.00012907712,0.99194896],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896455,0.00012332552,0.00008093996,0.00023330736,0.00046498733,0.00013283618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991549,0.00017027635,0.00006520649,0.00014382943,0.00034600752,0.00011985558],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005335227,0.001310013,0.0009340179,0.0018166379,0.0024252164,0.008237539,0.0010591409,0.0021626996,0.44952935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002180247,0.0005994636,0.00040740997,0.0053535015,0.0012069925,0.003854133,0.0020713343,0.0022861855,0.24017133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028245648,0.000012633826,0.00021410397,0.00045528472,0.0000063546686,0.0002443072,0.0008373073,0.00019287401,0.00023723638,0.06194314,0.77484566,0.16098286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021402634,0.0000019459596,0.0001416938,0.00015132286,0.0000012184078,0.00004347737,0.00019002343,0.000015779455,0.00004002173,0.0013115901,0.99809843,0.0000023054997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07556962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20103735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44952935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004723029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063115135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78517956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239951440","doi":"10.1080/03050710601179150","title":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030102616585432868,"score_gpt":0.3454846624718732,"score_spread":0.31538204588644037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239951440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020326702,0.0075721513,0.00016229654,0.038636178,0.0021464385,0.0002536348,0.0032153493,0.00023775395,0.94574356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005736229,0.0027771906,0.00013505772,0.015383958,0.0007837767,0.00013705852,0.0005892124,0.000077897814,0.97437966],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788046,0.00013947458,0.000109757406,0.0002894636,0.0012083631,0.0003724268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978835,0.00052702357,0.0001294095,0.00017461865,0.0010246459,0.00026066235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013406223,0.0009305151,0.0006901037,0.003711985,0.008965647,0.008357592,0.0011727727,0.009519005,0.17299019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074631763,0.0010335422,0.00047765896,0.0037390045,0.001968997,0.0024368553,0.0019380815,0.008228172,0.065311916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017345665,0.000057935347,0.000463124,0.00007943738,0.0000040625437,0.00009039509,0.0001912595,0.000038464146,0.00015686089,0.029271916,0.9509316,0.018697662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007462498,0.000008764966,0.0014760945,0.00013946403,0.0000030151045,0.00001624768,0.000095119816,0.000021141172,0.00004076813,0.0009996903,0.9971848,0.0000074653376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29143003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42500243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29143003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012748927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017559517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5794674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240113442","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511807268.020","title":"The condition of India (cont.): lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03380778294117588,"score_gpt":0.2823726376980244,"score_spread":0.24856485475684853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240113442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003461588,0.12664191,0.00069619674,0.052500743,0.010244459,0.00006609622,0.00067648385,0.00038770237,0.8053248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034143925,0.028622843,0.00047281105,0.021171475,0.0023929372,0.000059867634,0.00034419098,0.00015870677,0.91263324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980384,0.000027463599,0.000008751463,0.000025424155,0.00008828656,0.000046295725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998385,0.000055933022,0.000014377987,0.000011566023,0.000049547816,0.000029978532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015342643,0.0004111922,0.00022977273,0.0009216975,0.0023521506,0.0022799715,0.00060136145,0.0019567776,0.062233537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064334366,0.0002609812,0.00026035344,0.0013927427,0.00077024073,0.0019517025,0.0013282582,0.002560062,0.020843538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007464299,0.000013607877,0.00018117795,0.00010803011,0.0000015726534,0.00016625888,0.0013405937,0.000041668744,0.00012550992,0.011926763,0.9473093,0.03877816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016496156,0.000006360074,0.0010134451,0.00019782477,0.0000025679064,0.00027569462,0.0008836193,0.000020840143,0.00007992417,0.0017023706,0.9958106,0.0000050117183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025503078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08034729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062233537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017682028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018158831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20819193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241807468","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-71363-8_8","title":"The Art of Limitations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Innovation and change in professional education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Section (typography); Process (computing); Confession (law); Computer science; Reflection (computer programming); Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Limit (mathematics); Management science; Engineering; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.1849938744307432,"score_gpt":0.4426452510597949,"score_spread":0.2576513766290517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241807468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019519539,0.010583934,0.020365125,0.10223265,0.0040262523,0.000061170904,0.00009612436,0.000092158974,0.86059064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2654249,0.010085784,0.016584126,0.06541396,0.006585036,0.0008904193,0.00017438752,0.0007806921,0.6340606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892392,0.0057668188,0.0003739724,0.00136176,0.0025291536,0.00072911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879418,0.0072973454,0.00042933098,0.0024755583,0.0015101142,0.0003459873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011388569,0.000946653,0.0010924439,0.0018244367,0.0070341085,0.013032568,0.002704369,0.009101493,0.026305892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026496243,0.0006842385,0.0008760998,0.0014528766,0.05663716,0.020611078,0.008131033,0.016470516,0.0056658904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017590129,0.000002477426,0.000016752754,0.00001331528,0.0000013002286,0.0000146432885,0.0007797646,0.000026153126,0.000009844212,0.9840389,0.012247395,0.0028477025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049913674,0.0000033100123,0.000024911824,0.00014866162,0.0000029282799,0.00006772291,0.0008147773,0.00009537765,0.000043381162,0.7288998,0.26988676,0.000007405359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055546532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006275344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026305892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00672135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059586447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08800197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242091045","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.34460","title":"Shapiro, Dr Bernard Jack, (born 8 June 1935), Principal and Vice-Chancellor, McGill University, Montreal, 1994–2002, now Emeritus; first Ethics Commissioner of Canada, 2004–07","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Library science; Political science; Management; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.05378179675263731,"score_gpt":0.3253405078704006,"score_spread":0.27155871111776325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242091045","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002718386,0.079020835,0.0016865883,0.504821,0.11363827,0.00025791096,0.004015333,0.0009610999,0.2928805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002963572,0.007673005,0.00022847188,0.008798637,0.0018330346,0.000026041482,0.0002661653,0.00010379853,0.9781073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863356,0.00017872412,0.000073026815,0.00022091783,0.00063178863,0.00026200988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958852,0.00033629444,0.00021730752,0.00006641362,0.0019299135,0.0015649066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023790933,0.00064213754,0.00067795074,0.001328958,0.003048232,0.0034122826,0.0010392353,0.0031272066,0.13683832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052878787,0.00055647537,0.00027803148,0.00094512134,0.0009704272,0.0021088286,0.001527738,0.0046156193,0.088396765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009317446,0.0000025918607,0.000098589146,0.000018016734,5.23625e-7,0.000029095438,0.00004913108,0.000006546464,0.000021477048,0.0005546129,0.99245644,0.0067536696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034329769,0.0000068359805,0.00051114534,0.00004930348,0.0000010591968,0.00010329837,0.00013817156,0.000010373556,0.0000512223,0.00017896149,0.99893814,0.00000817167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11132696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2142062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13683832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060620625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010680383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45776975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242163558","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3930191","title":"Gender and Racial Diversity of Counsel at the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Diversity (politics); Law; Political science; Affirmative action; Gender diversity; Right to counsel; Racial diversity; Ethnic group; Corporate governance; Economics","score_opus":0.05340017718392431,"score_gpt":0.3657747972294521,"score_spread":0.3123746200455278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242163558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906503,0.000425259,0.00007159542,0.0018249216,0.000023764584,0.000031226937,0.00017536254,0.0000024167946,0.006795227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971865,0.00022933348,0.00007068777,0.0004722386,0.000012304889,0.000012412911,0.00006548744,0.0000051211955,0.0019457908],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920643,0.001110433,0.00019150348,0.0005980608,0.0032152703,0.002820558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778632,0.005314278,0.0039435364,0.0004144728,0.0066969856,0.0057675135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037565893,0.00022855875,0.000798027,0.0032698184,0.020517552,0.0053496966,0.003112248,0.002212047,0.006232712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024400288,0.0004609894,0.00044257776,0.005775316,0.005120699,0.0018372446,0.00282862,0.003461732,0.00036336467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018157024,0.00051532354,0.86295366,0.000044026157,0.000079531754,0.0005303386,0.11037417,0.00021003124,0.00024813545,0.0057782424,0.005614253,0.0134706935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024035804,0.00006638942,0.73938274,0.0002594016,0.00007307072,0.00019825021,0.25028265,0.00049757125,0.00018851848,0.0009964223,0.007978204,0.000052673044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9849326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99610424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05852004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05852004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09926584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42459458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242397554","doi":"10.7202/rdus","title":"Revue de droit de l'Université de Sherbrooke","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.017799181236221682,"score_gpt":0.26225943354651604,"score_spread":0.24446025231029436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242397554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006591262,0.06438261,0.0011704597,0.18806112,0.020285107,0.000118201126,0.003660559,0.00059422996,0.71513647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026890514,0.010894761,0.0005563388,0.006885786,0.00161338,0.00009753142,0.00054667273,0.00026233323,0.95225257],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932608,0.0012019045,0.00039845318,0.00075136113,0.0028943075,0.0014932287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920412,0.0027518643,0.00048260024,0.00088998646,0.0026151845,0.0012190756],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058114654,0.0010955215,0.0014865424,0.0030833492,0.0067741936,0.015793053,0.002274089,0.011220428,0.2790938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020193286,0.0006864609,0.0007636604,0.0028380125,0.0045982115,0.0061263135,0.005342985,0.009008276,0.061231375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008175275,0.00004091219,0.000592895,0.0003989974,0.000015871996,0.00036855965,0.0016652639,0.0001409787,0.00031056977,0.17942202,0.7688894,0.048072822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071791387,0.000004564326,0.0005525923,0.00018942339,0.0000022670272,0.000058213533,0.00025686753,0.000019308822,0.00012344602,0.0010542641,0.9977221,0.0000097716675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16185094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13927063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7209062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020460734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03213037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93366176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242489871","doi":"10.29173/alr332","title":"Introduction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographics; Legal profession; Diversity (politics); Theme (computing); Political science; Law; Legal service; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.05498208060460617,"score_gpt":0.37965972791507424,"score_spread":0.32467764731046805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242489871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012678299,0.006926319,0.0025664389,0.024419593,0.009376231,0.0002755524,0.007077638,0.0009492981,0.9471411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0089252265,0.0055764373,0.00217703,0.0108300485,0.002045775,0.00016903339,0.005648938,0.0003148766,0.9643127],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969798,0.00025931,0.00008979095,0.0005201261,0.001668265,0.00048261476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529845,0.0004858136,0.00014665852,0.00036790635,0.0029405323,0.000760735],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002402629,0.00082500314,0.0006321384,0.001806613,0.0038272894,0.007036263,0.002918059,0.0034833497,0.48279086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007285359,0.00037728078,0.00064649706,0.002253175,0.0013548642,0.0029216977,0.0029105877,0.0026121868,0.24115473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030383304,0.000025567693,0.0005447628,0.00021101658,0.000003126523,0.00007929515,0.0003570093,0.00007407188,0.0001429893,0.026953988,0.88920784,0.082369916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023860762,0.0000062418603,0.00047469477,0.00013263932,0.0000014896723,0.000038899172,0.0001586226,0.000012865995,0.00003033226,0.0016297704,0.99750805,0.0000039687184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08730648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10058281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48279086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071717333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015374773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73773605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242509207","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u178564","title":"Gale, Hon. George Alexander, (24 June 1906–25 July 1997), Chief Justice of Ontario, 1967–76; Vice-Chairman, Ontario Law Reform Commission, 1977–81","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Commission; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; History; Art history","score_opus":0.048726707385322594,"score_gpt":0.33813140129046126,"score_spread":0.2894046939051387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242509207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043481044,0.059082612,0.00063868595,0.15593171,0.01823676,0.00021563064,0.0056419126,0.00031261327,0.755592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046154293,0.003097164,0.000094596275,0.0062993974,0.00027591048,0.000019962885,0.00023232398,0.00005200957,0.98531324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913776,0.00006233225,0.0000271329,0.00010864811,0.0003865113,0.00027754085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906904,0.00010868022,0.00003136947,0.000025687052,0.00059320894,0.00017209022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010469261,0.00063130783,0.0003850943,0.00089550216,0.012139951,0.0038289677,0.0011082281,0.003902745,0.07847882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024777963,0.00056724646,0.00029004025,0.0010146323,0.0017227934,0.0020396118,0.0016935557,0.003382105,0.029743843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009565395,0.0000026608286,0.00016285015,0.000024098088,0.0000010000247,0.00005893836,0.00045898877,0.000011435991,0.00003300909,0.004053647,0.9892616,0.0059222025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014393455,0.0000012429632,0.0006691968,0.000027461434,9.28793e-7,0.000011124962,0.00032090838,0.0000049106634,0.000026510264,0.00022646676,0.99870634,0.0000034610755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80655843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9573654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19344157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020319838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022222096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38916153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242529280","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_369","title":"Council of American Overseas Research Centers (CAORC)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Political science; Library science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.1781886044545985,"score_gpt":0.39897900604039904,"score_spread":0.22079040158580054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242529280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014937135,0.005685537,0.00043961228,0.009678358,0.003152595,0.00005962655,0.00086097606,0.00023402003,0.9783956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030447375,0.0011863979,0.00031766584,0.00068679516,0.000060136157,0.000011914314,0.00016537879,0.000040536397,0.9944864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991146,0.00006026255,0.000015699032,0.00008659438,0.00047262543,0.0002502506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981452,0.00017750944,0.00004688998,0.00009087772,0.0009543492,0.0005851131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013387429,0.00039330384,0.0002846042,0.0013026654,0.005606835,0.0047246185,0.0008246491,0.0018466752,0.1262513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018987347,0.0003461498,0.00017337594,0.0027054765,0.0009803463,0.001337445,0.0014928053,0.0021764082,0.02588864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010221158,0.000017066104,0.00025309398,0.000039150138,5.905651e-7,0.00003625554,0.0003557334,0.000028958273,0.00013144311,0.031809922,0.90030444,0.067013144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.6951655e-7,0.0000012920617,0.00021835975,0.00001337048,3.0315076e-7,0.000009201999,0.00010188195,0.000009726749,0.000019108835,0.00028286618,0.9993418,0.0000012089484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45258668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7365159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45258668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007886275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040296305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89990467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243277603","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_275","title":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Legal Studies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.07047359099287602,"score_gpt":0.3701603249660598,"score_spread":0.29968673397318374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243277603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036034008,0.018732,0.00037235866,0.012642845,0.0019272437,0.00005079301,0.0043574004,0.00017099273,0.96138597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007467755,0.010276471,0.0007773887,0.0012850802,0.0001752296,0.00006293423,0.0012798797,0.00011735964,0.9785579],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968354,0.00015860621,0.00012239061,0.00027275816,0.0021132817,0.0004975896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619836,0.0004866778,0.00009849452,0.0003577038,0.0023590727,0.00049973966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017717396,0.0008992467,0.0011845654,0.0041190344,0.008501314,0.009180655,0.0019014919,0.0035029026,0.21829821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005331004,0.0006957696,0.00060276274,0.006931315,0.0032149618,0.0031393138,0.0023531981,0.0046222573,0.03566758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009681242,0.000011206183,0.00012850852,0.00014393684,0.0000033333429,0.000035410787,0.00021357008,0.00009416878,0.000030788586,0.15872099,0.7999643,0.040644065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020938005,9.262756e-7,0.0003008664,0.00010630492,0.00000204296,0.000009214188,0.00013398583,0.000031564363,0.000019853738,0.00511824,0.9942694,0.000005733143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9299317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95546347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9299317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04015064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13544069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7302803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243305108","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_296","title":"Cardiff University","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Optometrists; Camargo Foundation; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Royal Academy of Engineering; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.04003638174879715,"score_gpt":0.29817909706663215,"score_spread":0.258142715317835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243305108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005531652,0.0027057051,0.00021397234,0.003059767,0.001173319,0.000016016154,0.0006485052,0.000114005445,0.9915155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00093380985,0.00041510595,0.00008927402,0.00031888043,0.000026972935,0.0000050317576,0.00008685068,0.000041822703,0.9980823],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994553,0.000038916052,0.000016797967,0.000120577984,0.00026177644,0.00010663584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924904,0.00017632736,0.000023705466,0.00007875574,0.00028018962,0.00019198783],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003509058,0.0005641209,0.0004459594,0.0011956181,0.003033895,0.003751067,0.0005923183,0.00222799,0.65356016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020162123,0.00042969786,0.0003924802,0.0012471244,0.0007926792,0.0019050345,0.0016202852,0.0019983668,0.25607184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003516377,0.000025378311,0.00024208547,0.00013876538,0.0000034431962,0.00020684423,0.0002943857,0.00009894555,0.00033096102,0.04729312,0.84841615,0.10291463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025041622,0.000002898912,0.0002637585,0.000090203066,0.0000011832344,0.00003160341,0.00008934368,0.000021698777,0.00006168892,0.0011882264,0.9982439,0.000003038738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09927862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3356408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65356016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044578244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055048577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49415433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243348423","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v47i3.188149","title":"Book review of \"Handbook of Canadian Higher Education Law\"","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05313510558727247,"score_gpt":0.3984988549737057,"score_spread":0.3453637493864332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243348423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040689096,0.203959,0.0014688742,0.12248186,0.07448493,0.00018639275,0.0019046306,0.00047227237,0.5946352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055315844,0.10119943,0.0018219948,0.031743646,0.010382998,0.00011174123,0.0012915173,0.00025170975,0.8476653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976555,0.00012827788,0.00006247825,0.0001357962,0.0018018362,0.00021614188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954568,0.0005352135,0.00007802862,0.00009809791,0.0035020798,0.0003296841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014718937,0.0010399979,0.0008471713,0.009255762,0.006167875,0.005765402,0.0030149966,0.0034269146,0.07096988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063396604,0.000539365,0.0006049281,0.013053216,0.0033113179,0.0031136791,0.0012787916,0.0038765948,0.015484242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012341885,0.0000019759402,0.000009845117,0.000050202176,4.781306e-7,0.000007935157,0.000035448527,0.000024801375,0.0000120406985,0.0054723774,0.9830179,0.011365739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.7614726e-7,8.2965727e-7,0.000086044834,0.000082108396,7.96247e-7,0.0000138715795,0.00003182785,0.000011584856,0.000006506391,0.00054425595,0.99921787,0.000003546154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.848627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93805104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.848627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041434187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0699246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30452895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244063203","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_300","title":"CARIM","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.05159135001135277,"score_gpt":0.33483076345156104,"score_spread":0.28323941344020825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244063203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004029004,0.0015261335,0.0005519699,0.0021478322,0.0007325552,0.000022043407,0.00067387655,0.00046161577,0.99348104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012619004,0.0002810126,0.00020194169,0.0002899641,0.000021153992,0.000005752618,0.00014968411,0.00009413982,0.99769443],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994049,0.00002829414,0.000009586607,0.00009350919,0.0003376045,0.00012615167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938214,0.000048980062,0.0000130452345,0.000042719785,0.00037448868,0.00013868972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042113627,0.0006937707,0.00041623492,0.0017050698,0.005587683,0.005729668,0.0010577171,0.0018951369,0.4846286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012997449,0.0003938813,0.0004000127,0.0015640946,0.0010188202,0.0019957,0.0018679615,0.0017503618,0.18577504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016399568,0.000011349415,0.00016855569,0.000068702284,0.000001649104,0.00005269315,0.00033489382,0.000082504484,0.00016276562,0.027816193,0.8652807,0.10600355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.062212e-7,0.000001287615,0.00009509293,0.00002001424,6.4747326e-7,0.000014267373,0.000087702436,0.000021609536,0.000034302117,0.0004673203,0.999255,0.0000021171095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4268538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7764143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4846286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00825556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012281151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244421737","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_291","title":"Canon Collins Educational and Legal Assistance Trust","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Optometrists; Camargo Foundation; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Royal Academy of Engineering; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government","keywords":"Canon; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.035541561418760075,"score_gpt":0.320677729466371,"score_spread":0.28513616804761094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244421737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044918174,0.0022324577,0.00033012548,0.005041625,0.000987168,0.000030034553,0.0004023046,0.00024505344,0.9902822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010981527,0.00037524255,0.000105017214,0.00022045147,0.000016704173,0.000004856479,0.000055432884,0.000041688232,0.9980824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985442,0.00009337477,0.00004147268,0.00016634031,0.000851986,0.00030277556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971734,0.0002835169,0.00006332449,0.00017001,0.0015030835,0.00080651],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007802117,0.00063380913,0.00042086677,0.0020268112,0.00816854,0.0066279485,0.0009696808,0.003147484,0.44681564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003210843,0.0006090649,0.00032392098,0.0020713815,0.0014368315,0.0026343162,0.0021380028,0.0029474446,0.16230959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008934636,0.0000120339355,0.00014042616,0.000053500098,0.0000010088256,0.00011728526,0.0002885906,0.000046209956,0.000055381344,0.028612683,0.9159693,0.054694667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011236161,0.0000017811985,0.00015924197,0.000047075515,7.11709e-7,0.000031380594,0.00015661266,0.000021056203,0.000029110954,0.00068942463,0.99885917,0.0000034018624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4429178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80683166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44681564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011908399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031831637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8806794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244425098","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107707191.002","title":"Foreword","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.051083407354461825,"score_gpt":0.28382568681574566,"score_spread":0.23274227946128384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244425098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002803903,0.015300946,0.0011575237,0.08821863,0.11922516,0.00011390846,0.0012202759,0.00039250666,0.77409065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016149807,0.004386752,0.0003610051,0.019148463,0.011307176,0.000054884706,0.00056133367,0.00028288932,0.9622826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990707,0.00009891878,0.000049157283,0.00013824934,0.00055347616,0.000089503505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979868,0.00037331655,0.00007573379,0.00014457238,0.0011780455,0.00024154928],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007661084,0.0007200759,0.00060840696,0.001297544,0.0025381302,0.0046609133,0.0011832116,0.003463626,0.35672584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004794118,0.00029202417,0.00047984853,0.0010732118,0.0011268852,0.0047750133,0.002101574,0.005604554,0.31015575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048078505,0.000004883158,0.000011294965,0.00004745228,5.8499035e-7,0.000015085057,0.00005462797,0.000009169833,0.000045253513,0.010322406,0.9723188,0.017165694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.447403e-7,0.0000017629961,0.000022810591,0.000056380515,3.4622943e-7,0.000019021809,0.000032156557,0.0000034091806,0.000017700171,0.0010784346,0.99876606,0.000001148459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063248924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008069561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6432742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023467846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026559252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245121976","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6091-376-1_1","title":"Ethics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Axiology; Relation (database); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Metaphysics; Meta-ethics; Rhetoric; Philosophy; Boss; Sociology; Law; Information ethics; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.166374438721211,"score_gpt":0.37293763781957473,"score_spread":0.20656319909836374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245121976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076680473,0.0056556035,0.0069622025,0.02151342,0.00106255,0.00007782865,0.000091679816,0.000059749542,0.9638102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.076947905,0.009473007,0.008866571,0.030747194,0.0023452314,0.00036553806,0.00022518514,0.00020623198,0.870823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954828,0.0020931715,0.0002024996,0.0005681761,0.0012891511,0.00036433595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982272,0.0007389146,0.00010404249,0.0002647076,0.0005358517,0.00012931463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031300501,0.00069146213,0.0004310127,0.00085827394,0.0037064746,0.005265658,0.00095856475,0.0041341507,0.024296187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041875793,0.00029607085,0.00042553112,0.00084995845,0.010677576,0.004330077,0.0032228716,0.004935116,0.011855958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001994853,0.000006546425,0.00003417641,0.000039569706,0.0000014080442,0.000022205359,0.0006682826,0.00006454691,0.000039500672,0.9556918,0.035878688,0.007551198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024019107,0.0000040702853,0.00005607689,0.00012436966,0.000001028266,0.00005267193,0.0002043986,0.00005898762,0.000047804908,0.17680381,0.82264125,0.0000032058642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026792574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026486597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024296187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045874817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049707163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245964005","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-100144-8.00017-4","title":"Examples of law librarianship course descriptions in the master of library science programs in ALA accredited schools in Canada and the United States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Library science; Course (navigation); Political science; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.13260536010384502,"score_gpt":0.3146930586647198,"score_spread":0.18208769856087478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245964005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06330732,0.0033225785,0.005458473,0.0064494284,0.0006558969,0.00076901045,0.0048866346,0.0013263734,0.91382426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0688327,0.0019473694,0.011003882,0.0020236543,0.000057550493,0.00021732175,0.0031114751,0.0004475794,0.9123584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990338,0.00016704215,0.00003511188,0.000063991705,0.00042512835,0.0002748542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977586,0.0007486708,0.00010230983,0.000043953252,0.000651871,0.00069446134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010678117,0.00034095213,0.0002460132,0.0038425038,0.0067456863,0.0031247104,0.0016951059,0.0010307467,0.0821178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00214962,0.00039461907,0.00035206453,0.00900765,0.0009983634,0.001878775,0.0017305837,0.0012811403,0.010669727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055139055,0.00056816434,0.006383866,0.00030487104,0.0000043910595,0.0006116471,0.017229741,0.0006539887,0.001132891,0.042427402,0.69614756,0.23448029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010351225,0.00002588427,0.022959631,0.0002224886,0.0000035343971,0.00020883416,0.012729748,0.00052217755,0.0005921614,0.0015658806,0.96113074,0.000028685561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34888265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8116685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6511173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014328381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017225211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69370383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246197666","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14661492","title":"Friend of the Courthouse: a digital media project that promotes access to justice through procedural literacy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Toronto Metropolitan University; Mental Health Commission of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Modernization theory; Economic Justice; Procedural justice; Political science; Literacy; Law; Sociology; Media literacy; Public relations; Media studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.14111799043299839,"score_gpt":0.45928059496490053,"score_spread":0.31816260453190215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246197666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27494925,0.00069943495,0.016779644,0.01850184,0.00044486488,0.0018238181,0.0035260678,0.0032263729,0.6800487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4828337,0.0010130926,0.028547112,0.002381564,0.00012292698,0.0008589936,0.0022464644,0.000810885,0.48118526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862707,0.0003520373,0.000018661867,0.00013231019,0.0006035658,0.00026629746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965778,0.0006554006,0.000122408,0.00028618466,0.00066668045,0.0016915044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015058481,0.00029601637,0.00016420643,0.0009559846,0.0053929174,0.0043548374,0.0011702458,0.0012280945,0.039972942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004875244,0.00017942187,0.00020825249,0.0006665638,0.0030523154,0.0024304227,0.0030516651,0.00096811063,0.003781473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004469196,0.0022023376,0.013416648,0.0005156227,0.000034849494,0.0018174067,0.07392718,0.00061457657,0.016585931,0.08565347,0.45202893,0.3527561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013335414,0.00047293937,0.022931188,0.00018426686,0.000029104025,0.00036671397,0.022878809,0.0017745233,0.004599955,0.0071153184,0.93944657,0.00006722352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41831568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76440305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41831568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012140683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022479393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8317616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246639292","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2015.00721.x","title":"SLSA E‐Newsletter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Socio-Legal Studies Association","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.09787803011972525,"score_gpt":0.4092254532930785,"score_spread":0.3113474231733533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246639292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011388418,0.00163116,0.00050139136,0.017237276,0.019024557,0.00018291443,0.004385185,0.0021005461,0.9537982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012646669,0.0005319486,0.00014371565,0.0032738068,0.0024447986,0.000052621937,0.0013222343,0.00022948114,0.9907368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951625,0.000089101646,0.000024203195,0.000051302704,0.00023821245,0.000080958715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682957,0.000956723,0.00013928597,0.00023673939,0.00095524924,0.00088235014],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010977283,0.00076774624,0.0006203933,0.0015016112,0.0017221072,0.0053088353,0.000937186,0.0028572322,0.794288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033626615,0.00033263472,0.00041322038,0.00130607,0.0004899162,0.0024865225,0.002999719,0.0023300825,0.6121368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023059301,0.000023298922,0.00006508645,0.000063087326,6.235477e-7,0.000026570218,0.000029378201,0.000005172773,0.00009019519,0.00034496697,0.9761677,0.023160994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009414616,0.000014560507,0.0003328574,0.00004616164,6.762433e-7,0.000019682844,0.00008490903,0.000015910115,0.000039058243,0.00015936422,0.99927443,0.0000028943896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019676557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052861935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.794288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009145466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014931415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29342318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246698716","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_349","title":"Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the United Kingdom","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Optometrists; Camargo Foundation; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Royal Academy of Engineering; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government","keywords":"Commonwealth; Scholarship; Kingdom; Commission; Political science; Public administration; Law; Geology","score_opus":0.14410826797004261,"score_gpt":0.3893260112318629,"score_spread":0.24521774326182028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246698716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028314828,0.03204949,0.00028760295,0.01250601,0.0031442966,0.000051649462,0.0009695956,0.00022055532,0.94793934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007797635,0.002490106,0.00009598319,0.0005573412,0.000067243214,0.000011780676,0.00008381756,0.000043405176,0.98885274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825925,0.00016343265,0.00009987486,0.0002523016,0.0008195077,0.00040557954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822265,0.0003084533,0.000093427974,0.0001700821,0.0007558509,0.00044958346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076052273,0.00065488793,0.00069263903,0.001996495,0.008827799,0.009336804,0.0008171779,0.0048885937,0.14558469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038770812,0.00064191263,0.0003213186,0.0033534358,0.0024431765,0.002608626,0.0033497678,0.0029300747,0.031985745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029080005,0.0000150633905,0.00031462076,0.00022943784,0.000005347797,0.0003649602,0.0020220666,0.00009612794,0.00014966742,0.117207654,0.8107626,0.0688034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018870379,0.0000034203194,0.0004781565,0.00008357078,0.0000014638258,0.000026114723,0.00028001104,0.000008617235,0.00002260802,0.0008008897,0.9982894,0.000003786909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49041286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8163579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49041286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019794242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027582807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97511667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247329531","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/3566.003.0012","title":"Why Wasn’t O. J. Convicted? Emotional Coherence in Legal Inference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"The MIT Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Psychology; Inference; Law; Political science; Criminology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.07130688875975338,"score_gpt":0.34171721904851554,"score_spread":0.27041033028876216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247329531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84075606,0.0040322375,0.019296074,0.06250626,0.00032523068,0.000087012384,0.00006625717,0.000044598244,0.07288632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966108,0.0003490902,0.0012279224,0.0012977456,0.000078266276,0.000015672822,0.0000133627245,0.000010128617,0.0003969324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99066305,0.0058301557,0.0006314918,0.0007261484,0.0014517547,0.0006973731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9677926,0.023339406,0.004749984,0.0010394691,0.0020989184,0.0009796699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011187022,0.00023006143,0.00046350184,0.001662101,0.0033145424,0.0056318087,0.0006140545,0.002202456,0.0025324672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06389645,0.00036216792,0.00045909034,0.001256879,0.0097867865,0.004857763,0.0032525563,0.0029660196,0.00020322438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091335905,0.00032359824,0.14732645,0.00053477037,0.00041714456,0.0027851427,0.13398662,0.0044917404,0.0025256956,0.5442006,0.009579898,0.15291496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115502415,0.00021177453,0.1539715,0.0005199817,0.00020308048,0.0007314751,0.054408405,0.009648987,0.0010536899,0.7636291,0.015332939,0.00017370179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057807094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005755022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011187022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032354065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014696073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059163332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247660381","doi":"10.4018/9781591405733.ch067","title":"Knowledge Sharing in Legal Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.08127254413743325,"score_gpt":0.38485079585648024,"score_spread":0.303578251719047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247660381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0104345195,0.025696274,0.008662189,0.017560653,0.0003983955,0.000048121135,0.000017558767,0.000042351283,0.93714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66707236,0.04351312,0.010151306,0.005198834,0.00093986216,0.00023654253,0.000079482634,0.00010002744,0.27270842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962358,0.0022058957,0.000098470045,0.0003087956,0.00081902987,0.00033209656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971252,0.0019455395,0.00018439867,0.00036334863,0.00016206158,0.00021957021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034184663,0.00041288527,0.00041817134,0.001721178,0.0058645294,0.0100531895,0.0014162996,0.0046456917,0.013687533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042644646,0.00024892713,0.00035528716,0.0031089229,0.017890966,0.014478384,0.008074528,0.0033481726,0.002209754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004049364,0.000027931635,0.00009045855,0.00014811855,0.0000030679166,0.00013367493,0.02255288,0.00028074955,0.000101475474,0.9134898,0.008708038,0.05445978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049258024,0.00002003826,0.00025979,0.0009620421,0.0000038199987,0.00030982826,0.0116057815,0.00037888653,0.00016899119,0.57623065,0.41004348,0.000011810832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031354334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029851298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013687533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006109786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067108464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0457893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247808884","doi":"10.5406/amerjtheophil.41.2-3.0184","title":"Contemporary Philosophical Proposals for the University: Toward a Philosophy of Higher Education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Theology & Philosophy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy education; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0881718987715581,"score_gpt":0.35736914275874204,"score_spread":0.2691972439871839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247808884","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025975304,0.008503254,0.04998202,0.6318522,0.0034807539,0.00005907031,0.00005349245,0.00009929523,0.2799947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90550184,0.0038535546,0.02182335,0.036436725,0.003332222,0.00019254135,0.00004204858,0.000101753154,0.028715918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99147534,0.005945071,0.00024493187,0.00046213288,0.0013059209,0.00056670484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890115,0.0056437845,0.0006740398,0.00070265366,0.0020530692,0.0019149324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013819115,0.0004228566,0.0004894564,0.0032763504,0.010396735,0.016483776,0.0021601717,0.010983539,0.005161822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012686988,0.00030758994,0.0005227507,0.0025428266,0.07706734,0.013418707,0.0049949256,0.014661678,0.0007403761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012719406,0.0000058373503,0.000029316581,0.0000045153943,3.297947e-7,0.0000041451513,0.0010278426,0.000046817306,0.0000070876004,0.99666744,0.0014726282,0.0007328778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069115627,0.0000058434166,0.000105477775,0.000044329165,0.0000013716087,0.000017923878,0.0019393812,0.0004220425,0.0000280292,0.963851,0.03357106,0.0000066804846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057629943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057300753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016483776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010329108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017471658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074943304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248148381","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.313","title":"LEGAL POSITIVISM AS AN IDEA ABOUT MORALITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Morality; Utilitarianism; Legal realism; Law; Directive; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Legal profession","score_opus":0.04242048475938505,"score_gpt":0.3216567940517019,"score_spread":0.27923630929231685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248148381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0154327,0.012839722,0.14503035,0.4795141,0.0027693447,0.00006290026,0.00011221399,0.00014369974,0.34409496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87810344,0.0074131386,0.028465766,0.05009035,0.004683367,0.00035982975,0.00009562778,0.0002331779,0.030555312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913272,0.005351234,0.00027761704,0.0008572134,0.0014427074,0.0007440489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803498,0.014306836,0.0014205636,0.0014315714,0.0015404888,0.0009507417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01908762,0.0006785635,0.0011628784,0.0026440183,0.0051236707,0.012910989,0.003804263,0.008168265,0.007828949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019428745,0.00055238965,0.001187168,0.0017894291,0.071459815,0.02487821,0.00625682,0.014656719,0.0014074048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015422656,0.0000029391645,0.000019209565,0.000008353949,0.0000011372802,0.0000061231162,0.00058315095,0.000027858741,0.000011030126,0.998353,0.0006261475,0.00035948018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003005553,0.0000052742657,0.000030181209,0.000043940418,0.0000013168486,0.000014374645,0.00048310665,0.00015390442,0.000040386116,0.9896634,0.009557629,0.000003396442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023259139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017045245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01908762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007343977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003664471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10094625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248622385","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-95988-4_814","title":"Sir Richard Stapley Educational Trust","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Board; Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; Savoy Foundation; University of Calgary; U.S. Department of State","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.049050566006464284,"score_gpt":0.3244803922687553,"score_spread":0.275429826262291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248622385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013600772,0.023090452,0.0011983841,0.17279536,0.07440682,0.0001035113,0.00041810924,0.0003317113,0.7262956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022707442,0.002305562,0.0001847613,0.0074366136,0.0010649775,0.00001569776,0.000039894683,0.000057016558,0.9866247],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912816,0.00013837166,0.000030845284,0.00011319476,0.00040150015,0.00018790334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799,0.00017583669,0.00006849023,0.00008840486,0.00071548985,0.0009617127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009426528,0.00050781225,0.00030601863,0.0006206193,0.0016260745,0.0022028259,0.00069619284,0.0031518675,0.239504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034750786,0.00029515065,0.00033678114,0.0003686673,0.000656133,0.0018638392,0.0024794503,0.00416258,0.103081204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005792596,0.0000073156657,0.00006428495,0.000030106883,7.079393e-7,0.00011312408,0.000035482022,0.00001414687,0.000027090291,0.002674147,0.9690248,0.028003145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001820759,0.0000058067917,0.00011079985,0.000056104273,5.1761543e-7,0.00022742046,0.00005296524,0.000009576018,0.000015681808,0.0003160424,0.99920124,0.000002112581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009217105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03429401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.239504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017293823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003855402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80122066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248628795","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14661492.v1","title":"Friend of the Courthouse: a digital media project that promotes access to justice through procedural literacy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Toronto Metropolitan University; Mental Health Commission of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Modernization theory; Procedural justice; Political science; Literacy; Law; Media literacy; Sociology; Public relations; Internet privacy; Media studies; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.14111799043299839,"score_gpt":0.45928059496490053,"score_spread":0.31816260453190215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248628795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27494925,0.00069943495,0.016779644,0.01850184,0.00044486488,0.0018238181,0.0035260678,0.0032263729,0.6800487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4828337,0.0010130926,0.028547112,0.002381564,0.00012292698,0.0008589936,0.0022464644,0.000810885,0.48118526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862707,0.0003520373,0.000018661867,0.00013231019,0.0006035658,0.00026629746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965778,0.0006554006,0.000122408,0.00028618466,0.00066668045,0.0016915044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015058481,0.00029601637,0.00016420643,0.0009559846,0.0053929174,0.0043548374,0.0011702458,0.0012280945,0.039972942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004875244,0.00017942187,0.00020825249,0.0006665638,0.0030523154,0.0024304227,0.0030516651,0.00096811063,0.003781473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004469196,0.0022023376,0.013416648,0.0005156227,0.000034849494,0.0018174067,0.07392718,0.00061457657,0.016585931,0.08565347,0.45202893,0.3527561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013335414,0.00047293937,0.022931188,0.00018426686,0.000029104025,0.00036671397,0.022878809,0.0017745233,0.004599955,0.0071153184,0.93944657,0.00006722352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41831568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76440305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41831568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012140683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022479393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8317616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248781124","doi":"10.1108/ilds.2000.12228aab.018","title":"Canadian court rejects fair dealing defence by library","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Computer security; Operations research; Business; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.010103168903791749,"score_gpt":0.3070073940042801,"score_spread":0.29690422510048836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248781124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024267396,0.001675302,0.0027173457,0.34414262,0.0027968206,0.0003318142,0.0008500878,0.00050739886,0.62271124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16540448,0.0010364741,0.0021181733,0.29618308,0.0015213224,0.00023109977,0.00025192642,0.00037829365,0.53287506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9506897,0.0029743449,0.0017425535,0.0040524937,0.024531558,0.016009422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93899924,0.029171957,0.0010805571,0.003231202,0.022858413,0.0046586785],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021815538,0.0014008124,0.0024391634,0.006869251,0.05713533,0.02682154,0.010624892,0.07100589,0.042939086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08070463,0.0027230447,0.0034181771,0.007121357,0.01365636,0.008328733,0.0076787043,0.043250084,0.005709225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011103606,0.000067774075,0.0013590516,0.00009114191,0.00005938335,0.00084461196,0.004235943,0.0002808319,0.00045381478,0.5138653,0.46714443,0.011486717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024059787,0.00005966419,0.0050192103,0.00048093946,0.0002943717,0.0003543788,0.0065562585,0.0013128101,0.0016628791,0.0701319,0.9134671,0.0004198931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95201546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97725666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97317845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08450072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16797808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6130985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249099904","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316337875","title":"Fighting Fair","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Legal ethics; Law; Honor; Settlement (finance); Political science; Legal profession; Analogy; Economic Justice; Dilemma; Ethical dilemma; Legal realism; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Business","score_opus":0.062077414310443446,"score_gpt":0.30066293299140473,"score_spread":0.23858551868096128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249099904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035871146,0.0029559117,0.011098235,0.037855737,0.0019791254,0.00006330685,0.0000312875,0.00011469951,0.9423147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20317177,0.002529372,0.0078009325,0.024133675,0.0008121052,0.00015849982,0.00005442455,0.00022810482,0.761111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964393,0.0013026894,0.000089690846,0.0006821277,0.0009184614,0.0005677314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978446,0.0009891193,0.00014494063,0.00033048211,0.00030013817,0.0003908291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051132175,0.0006957989,0.00042571046,0.0011468612,0.007580365,0.008060576,0.0011345136,0.0050591943,0.029451072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084099,0.00023021262,0.0005434109,0.0006096459,0.02250382,0.010618763,0.0056410474,0.0067732306,0.0054302723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033751633,0.000008909356,0.000051640243,0.000015858806,0.0000019120498,0.000020162026,0.0015543151,0.00005835334,0.000036387268,0.9568173,0.030149331,0.011282467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058035475,0.00001883332,0.00012344064,0.00013520528,0.0000036298657,0.0000765813,0.0015565818,0.00025481408,0.00019190833,0.4041939,0.59343153,0.000007789592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005453109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008855914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029451072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059365174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005552265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09852368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249280584","doi":"10.4000/hommesmigrations.3123","title":"The Good Lie","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Hommes & migrations","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.0848367859243728,"score_gpt":0.38380570506240813,"score_spread":0.29896891913803536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249280584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016783092,0.013263557,0.002557876,0.22566509,0.012904545,0.000069317015,0.00014560604,0.00013647696,0.7284745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22768737,0.004277471,0.0016627611,0.041964028,0.0012954748,0.000060964714,0.00008693007,0.00025468864,0.72271025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963701,0.0013578864,0.0000690156,0.0005676543,0.00078769715,0.0008476772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633837,0.00071509305,0.00017731455,0.0002390107,0.0009867131,0.00154342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002954711,0.0005196832,0.0003963267,0.001028718,0.0181834,0.014209248,0.00093721546,0.0048500495,0.032673102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006939519,0.00036535904,0.00040012805,0.0005600663,0.016581021,0.0062360913,0.0067235082,0.01024881,0.0063329083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003635931,0.00003537925,0.00072386634,0.0000799552,0.0000071501354,0.00040736166,0.052153606,0.000046726807,0.00029146147,0.57419634,0.3403928,0.031628966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034702048,0.000010712343,0.00031611556,0.00010073296,0.0000024058047,0.00010386121,0.013338289,0.000018159908,0.00010460456,0.0080836,0.9779087,0.000009318848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07649864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18298459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07649864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01164545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01457507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1521067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249297268","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_299","title":"Cargill","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04991027217359135,"score_gpt":0.3320963596114717,"score_spread":0.2821860874378804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249297268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005252412,0.0035666435,0.0007438154,0.0060571963,0.001337453,0.000029826733,0.00043682804,0.00030638027,0.98699665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013738326,0.00041319427,0.00019014995,0.0006355331,0.000023120136,0.0000053671893,0.00005909984,0.000063540465,0.9972363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935776,0.000035487497,0.00000994662,0.000119942575,0.00034448435,0.0001323897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993781,0.00006909192,0.000012386116,0.00003570593,0.0003708705,0.00013385122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044218035,0.0006235327,0.00033212834,0.0016724629,0.0072641326,0.005373797,0.0009404661,0.0024145907,0.30478027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014781985,0.00044598532,0.00037646558,0.0012727288,0.0012454694,0.002164189,0.0018616174,0.0024802384,0.07249416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011641027,0.0000096538715,0.00014503924,0.00004465455,0.000001538615,0.00006909461,0.00047462972,0.00007550767,0.000104894025,0.04177615,0.88413835,0.07314898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.2644596e-7,0.0000011991277,0.00009613923,0.000026655025,7.667014e-7,0.000018769255,0.00012912553,0.000023855864,0.00003052798,0.0008845606,0.9987847,0.000002862252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56058717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8520329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56058717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012124178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014520131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249315802","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59140-789-8.ch039","title":"Courts on the Web in Russia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Skepticism; Economic Justice; Political science","score_opus":0.07692944479282737,"score_gpt":0.37327013608620674,"score_spread":0.29634069129337937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249315802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26035392,0.026881672,0.0013981184,0.03601935,0.0006274576,0.000035011457,0.00091037585,0.00020348643,0.67357063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94822156,0.014029831,0.0005300115,0.0028584327,0.0003754869,0.000028764836,0.00060995686,0.000060659895,0.033285324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986707,0.0005239965,0.00007983323,0.0001778914,0.0003632679,0.00018429247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982217,0.0006272736,0.0004513134,0.00011503251,0.00017763818,0.0004069876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067846006,0.00007623322,0.00021426557,0.0022118315,0.0024664374,0.007255998,0.00041705728,0.0013936961,0.014097811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029860367,0.00016995017,0.00018332586,0.0038053272,0.0019105315,0.0048671104,0.0034944988,0.0015220229,0.0027168568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009962902,0.00027495562,0.07866768,0.0006612738,0.000057917292,0.0064643184,0.047123913,0.00036253774,0.0019321558,0.4328235,0.12349326,0.30803877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013462982,0.00003687849,0.08667445,0.0007947994,0.00003259075,0.0024305985,0.020584546,0.0004729576,0.00034600205,0.021562546,0.8670238,0.000027301967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011018299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009230318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014097811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024224482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017812585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047161877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249716097","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_62-2","title":"Inclusive Legal Positivism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Positivism; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Legal research; Legal realism","score_opus":0.03266730902986802,"score_gpt":0.3774347348438907,"score_spread":0.34476742581402264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249716097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019025401,0.003607167,0.011653254,0.015617873,0.0007786994,0.000018794532,0.000024082421,0.000038346727,0.96635926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34892526,0.007686478,0.009276305,0.010441847,0.0016773287,0.00026069014,0.00011431871,0.00021984555,0.621398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971353,0.0012424521,0.00006662856,0.00030043838,0.0010210283,0.00023401958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723274,0.0017819782,0.00008008023,0.00041756968,0.0003143822,0.00017319052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034011833,0.00062838534,0.0006051718,0.001538533,0.004233386,0.009079725,0.0015910927,0.0036934512,0.020001689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004782622,0.000339388,0.00039038534,0.0012468018,0.025967758,0.009177094,0.005526772,0.008527378,0.0033925408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.757056e-7,0.0000062655317,0.0000073239057,0.000009851388,4.6157055e-7,0.0000054972706,0.0004621458,0.00003696056,0.000007818646,0.9927724,0.0038399894,0.002850692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017333446,0.0000013154348,0.000022498256,0.00007144915,0.0000010037753,0.000013286295,0.00037427573,0.00009368787,0.000044318112,0.9085219,0.090852484,0.000001927345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027117815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050883004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020001689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065264585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059022745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06691229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249933271","doi":"10.1108/s1521-6136(2001)3","title":"Legal Professions: Work, Structure and Organization","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.027101067354962153,"score_gpt":0.3501249044114485,"score_spread":0.32302383705648635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249933271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01445361,0.119817525,0.0018536778,0.05299234,0.0025283236,0.00007736316,0.00018166019,0.00007512832,0.8080204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23797356,0.10795329,0.0039311023,0.008004068,0.0029412892,0.00018769763,0.00042433463,0.000102807746,0.63848186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990145,0.0002928961,0.00003557559,0.000098180724,0.000443508,0.00011527087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999401,0.00019430659,0.00006922812,0.00003206644,0.00012122182,0.00018222889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006012697,0.00025742408,0.0002254058,0.0015615209,0.0025859368,0.006800446,0.0005616112,0.0012074912,0.009719081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017760457,0.00019801722,0.00012053545,0.0033728806,0.005928683,0.003696581,0.002015839,0.0015206872,0.0033120622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011896349,0.00007376477,0.0032698163,0.00030468492,0.000004307376,0.0001686111,0.034932528,0.00022749542,0.00029109197,0.3710938,0.32225415,0.26736787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031429247,0.000013646841,0.007112887,0.0003809775,0.0000011283399,0.00017034225,0.010255118,0.000053760752,0.000020886508,0.028063223,0.9539193,0.000005503379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012145093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02612005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012145093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038243784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00594647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03251356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250006761","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_342","title":"Clemson University","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Optometrists; Camargo Foundation; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Royal Academy of Engineering; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04383028402972004,"score_gpt":0.30483223835372,"score_spread":0.2610019543239999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250006761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070194266,0.0030075521,0.0002028499,0.0036807535,0.0010322337,0.000017378054,0.0004940647,0.00013361697,0.99072963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001153358,0.00039216992,0.000089714624,0.000257327,0.000024780205,0.0000040283303,0.0000529928,0.000037986334,0.9979875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994124,0.000038350772,0.000016427397,0.00013913082,0.0002848508,0.00010883605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991642,0.00013100987,0.000022166376,0.00004871761,0.00037213127,0.00026186276],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034313215,0.00061871135,0.00047793722,0.0015745913,0.0074023623,0.0048400415,0.00070789934,0.001883617,0.54458946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018296071,0.00041120843,0.0003669805,0.0013741127,0.0011407428,0.0020306828,0.0018490613,0.002511915,0.13488244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023285911,0.000025809837,0.0002406456,0.000087226,0.0000026412035,0.00020220107,0.0004744569,0.000080216014,0.00018732171,0.039926454,0.8870827,0.07166688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014876227,0.0000019368094,0.00023062869,0.000067468136,8.560216e-7,0.00003261376,0.00016894475,0.000026498345,0.000059320908,0.0010840956,0.998323,0.0000030812887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21542911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63013065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45541054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009265452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010182592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64958787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250144784","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1011","title":"METHODOLOGY AND PERSPECTIVE IN THE THEORY OF LAWYERS’ ETHICS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSORS WOOLLEY AND MARKOVITS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Adjudication; Identity (music); Sociology; Legal profession; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.10050969560981,"score_gpt":0.41219862166908017,"score_spread":0.3116889260592702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250144784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00072991755,0.007103871,0.0014620615,0.9872033,0.0018950521,0.000007413745,0.0000067493133,0.000006700508,0.0015849374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12358155,0.02158419,0.010148278,0.8069815,0.02607296,0.0004214347,0.000034174005,0.00013397208,0.011041978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8665458,0.110595316,0.0026730166,0.006065885,0.012022939,0.0020970365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71728545,0.25438732,0.0049091754,0.004070109,0.013048835,0.0062992033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0926168,0.0010541044,0.0024605982,0.0033337257,0.015169061,0.01972186,0.00666853,0.025270304,0.0029970394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.102383286,0.0011849011,0.0015875319,0.0038521548,0.093620084,0.024677798,0.011578962,0.048429377,0.00067642116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030332447,0.000055786342,0.00027405945,0.00018829024,0.000012874642,0.00018358222,0.02589758,0.00034517722,0.00006958459,0.8399463,0.12641306,0.0065834327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058285455,0.00004340976,0.00038945838,0.00080946926,0.000008247021,0.0001661976,0.019973796,0.0010590707,0.00011931727,0.56250185,0.41480514,0.00006575207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021481806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022052353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0926168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03108628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01924008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4898103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250408531","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0024","title":"The Teacher","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affection; Sociology; Law; Rigour; Humanity; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019947039724658742,"score_gpt":0.31696612613223707,"score_spread":0.29701908640757835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250408531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027640043,0.012733835,0.00384782,0.24239737,0.029594814,0.00013734127,0.00029882364,0.00060683396,0.70761925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019939557,0.0028311615,0.0012018736,0.039866697,0.0015786479,0.00006459586,0.00014532695,0.00028012,0.9340919],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960485,0.0010494594,0.00016164083,0.0007859016,0.001194944,0.0007595399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99280316,0.000517754,0.00036737183,0.00063581666,0.003103603,0.0025722643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021147765,0.0004584807,0.0005012684,0.0009200594,0.008832156,0.008975562,0.0011000915,0.0036009261,0.13459657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011646087,0.00047982385,0.0003808545,0.0007849363,0.003641858,0.0067149666,0.0064132516,0.007941112,0.09276594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011198289,0.000031384043,0.00038855095,0.000058829486,0.0000023385412,0.0001606165,0.004782217,0.000017372971,0.00022892369,0.04065369,0.91084933,0.042815562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014401681,0.00000494565,0.000118015756,0.00005298836,6.028235e-7,0.00010795098,0.0016641255,0.000006063618,0.000025401238,0.0014422333,0.9965733,0.0000029504965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074516693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015449745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13459657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005555341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008591016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4502704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250534731","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_316","title":"Centre for Asia-Pacific Initiatives (CAPI)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Geography; Asia pacific; Political science; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.05120010329582189,"score_gpt":0.3344249235467145,"score_spread":0.2832248202508926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250534731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055509957,0.005017497,0.00034294176,0.010057624,0.0017877886,0.00003646165,0.00065030484,0.00021845069,0.9813339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056470875,0.0030762795,0.00090540055,0.0015003245,0.00009843357,0.000029791947,0.0002961376,0.00011119891,0.9883355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993043,0.000033782668,0.000010859055,0.0000565214,0.0003753093,0.00021924484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989754,0.00005684069,0.000029580948,0.00003930996,0.0004559514,0.0004428985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090828846,0.0005663346,0.00025836925,0.0013274918,0.005118355,0.0056802947,0.0007046974,0.001566079,0.12186628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013751056,0.00027250045,0.0002421234,0.0026165075,0.0009907811,0.0021661567,0.0028974244,0.0030623712,0.027336093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000606603,0.000010738353,0.0002014466,0.000072476105,0.0000011348199,0.00005223939,0.00050132954,0.000030996718,0.00007396205,0.041069802,0.8837188,0.07426106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.611031e-7,0.000001118029,0.0002049559,0.00003207851,5.856375e-7,0.000017921386,0.00018485803,0.0000104403225,0.000022280845,0.00059271546,0.99893075,0.0000016245475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54867905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7676099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54867905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011698273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05265027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90795773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251701146","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4052067","title":"Building Trusted Relationships Through Interactive PLE Conversations - A Report on the Newcomer Conversations: Learning Canadian Law Project","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Citizenship; Immigration; Political science; Law; Sociology; Asylum seeker; Public relations","score_opus":0.07313580962840463,"score_gpt":0.37574792538484514,"score_spread":0.30261211575644054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251701146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5211591,0.001743789,0.024412218,0.047127992,0.0007084762,0.0028293394,0.0009132057,0.001958963,0.3991469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8995097,0.0009961531,0.012063458,0.0028408086,0.0001172893,0.0009831185,0.00062074326,0.00046738892,0.082401246],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702955,0.017325459,0.0003696776,0.0015596929,0.005307656,0.00514208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.916507,0.03549914,0.0025156175,0.005507273,0.012053455,0.027917555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028139735,0.00096315495,0.00068432395,0.0020061191,0.036687847,0.011852842,0.0045751757,0.004365784,0.030237803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061106313,0.0008252729,0.0006078172,0.0017760271,0.010190785,0.012684193,0.022942927,0.008533721,0.0050261123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046012335,0.0024130293,0.017403303,0.00036418962,0.00003489167,0.0015090527,0.6719937,0.00065987295,0.0025177537,0.022758901,0.06816311,0.21172203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001657079,0.0003713138,0.018162908,0.0005339746,0.000048917245,0.00044620674,0.551843,0.0017429711,0.0029058065,0.01224651,0.41137642,0.00015628309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40232104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67055905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59767896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030471748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08797194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7999585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251738714","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_336","title":"Chinese American Medical Society (CAMS)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.026621517910298473,"score_gpt":0.3526837615935208,"score_spread":0.3260622436832223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251738714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008224396,0.018137135,0.0005482329,0.019594729,0.004884602,0.00011754625,0.0020178878,0.00027685388,0.9461986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05208118,0.012706538,0.0008721132,0.0063177356,0.0010163146,0.00012784883,0.0014347649,0.000070042894,0.9253735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995109,0.000033369375,0.000021203385,0.0000519452,0.00020751664,0.00017501936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958235,0.000049879658,0.0000252977,0.000024198287,0.00016411439,0.00015423166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054605916,0.00043681674,0.00030458716,0.0022516972,0.0028348742,0.00159187,0.0005155853,0.0008828393,0.10119284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012769214,0.00016132783,0.00027343578,0.0035588224,0.0008682796,0.0007783166,0.0011742136,0.00087900384,0.01680895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013117928,0.000013747079,0.0016585172,0.00014219354,0.000004046296,0.000117495816,0.0008082732,0.000032969227,0.00016612049,0.03487815,0.8416066,0.12055878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031560787,0.000009201515,0.004608203,0.00004781518,0.000003797942,0.00009374713,0.00021275008,0.000045982575,0.000040779,0.0009278864,0.9940018,0.0000048153743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14365794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27938226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14365794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003656251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014589809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33852375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252037961","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6091-731-8","title":"Phronesis as Professional Knowledge","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":225,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Charles Sturt University","keywords":"Phronesis; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04626959592968561,"score_gpt":0.3879190824036205,"score_spread":0.3416494864739349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252037961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013713138,0.006067051,0.005773837,0.0064682076,0.0013902055,0.000029958728,0.000021078238,0.00006299368,0.97881544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19105716,0.010292575,0.0062707225,0.004249835,0.0024893212,0.00020208096,0.000104725295,0.00014044285,0.78519315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981336,0.00083795266,0.00008309326,0.0002318177,0.0005570614,0.00015648456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822086,0.0011120944,0.00008576729,0.00023465067,0.00019000254,0.00015649437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017723831,0.0005303078,0.0003298642,0.0011500968,0.0027128845,0.008695246,0.0009631577,0.0018227336,0.016411405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037737514,0.00019772384,0.00024190695,0.0010338101,0.01594618,0.008887495,0.0033614745,0.0041859034,0.0040542996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003571404,0.0000057888396,0.000021871805,0.000057716712,7.718946e-7,0.00006164695,0.0061839763,0.000036559457,0.000077239245,0.9611692,0.013038829,0.019342834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068940767,0.000016838485,0.00013232045,0.0002574624,0.0000027045626,0.00020536766,0.002208777,0.0002335997,0.00014914521,0.33540547,0.66137373,0.000007752675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034213935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040224516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016411405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035575393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040789824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0549016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252188144","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-1714-0119","title":"submission-to-the-canadian-government-in-preparation-for-the-50th-session-of-the-unchr-from-the-interchurch-committee-on-human-rights-in-latin-america-jan-1994-12-pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Latin Americans; Political science; Government (linguistics); Library science; Public administration; Law; Business; Computer science; Advertising; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05825050803196535,"score_gpt":0.4165524129577917,"score_spread":0.35830190492582636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252188144","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014189752,0.000064379994,0.000071932045,0.00022623622,0.00015843815,0.000023284378,0.9963433,0.00061627134,0.0023542182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00043735272,0.000072556126,0.00022512827,0.00011079685,0.000021227497,0.00007113037,0.9927071,0.00022352122,0.0061313156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986552,0.00020156518,0.000104024475,0.0002657919,0.00041771613,0.00035564005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99498874,0.0007594112,0.00022306302,0.0012970348,0.00166155,0.0010701512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023713673,0.0018961646,0.0014076823,0.0031677012,0.0015299384,0.005109687,0.002652183,0.0019264359,0.17296238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00835122,0.00075398054,0.0014537361,0.0043041958,0.0008005713,0.0020451644,0.00312451,0.0020876643,0.2708839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021563561,0.000006014752,0.00034286606,0.00008253916,0.0000054543007,0.000004326805,0.00000801527,0.000040992312,0.000024857596,0.00015615408,0.99836797,0.00093932624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010736304,0.000007535927,0.0030147748,0.00013807922,0.000008442012,0.000013247525,0.00009321184,0.00022164122,0.0002267048,0.000513763,0.9956371,0.000018126466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14201105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31719932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85798895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039691543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008355486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5786168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252698176","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59140-573-3.ch067","title":"Knowledge Sharing in Legal Practice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Knowledge management; Business; Knowledge sharing; Legal practice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.050255635860958554,"score_gpt":0.3795066023293226,"score_spread":0.32925096646836405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252698176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01633485,0.01179485,0.01783674,0.013742676,0.00030210495,0.000057983852,0.000015738626,0.000039381535,0.93987584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8495727,0.014354754,0.0097894985,0.0021542145,0.0005922768,0.00021129499,0.000048466496,0.00005877845,0.12321799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941193,0.0035054616,0.00018058877,0.00052217656,0.0011389634,0.0005335387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583423,0.0026532968,0.0003103838,0.00063410174,0.00025715973,0.0003108074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004680594,0.00044363525,0.00040153041,0.0019207379,0.0061270827,0.011447879,0.001495414,0.0053685796,0.011223046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059146364,0.00030438395,0.00039772916,0.0031051682,0.020235868,0.016011482,0.009968401,0.0031694209,0.0016288242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035311052,0.000020730453,0.00010771276,0.000071286595,0.0000027357555,0.00011406469,0.013377033,0.00030654005,0.00007873192,0.95668346,0.0025820008,0.02665222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055015303,0.000021402275,0.00026516,0.0004622832,0.000004182802,0.00027833192,0.008115981,0.00061476993,0.00018071357,0.8195511,0.17048898,0.000011607165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031057866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022925907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011447879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063790474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064370716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046283484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252727894","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1003","title":"THREE ISSUES IN LEGAL ETHICS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Law; Adjudication; Jury; Political science; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.03897483545341218,"score_gpt":0.3586189794483755,"score_spread":0.3196441439949633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252727894","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031159217,0.014258816,0.013021223,0.64586097,0.004463507,0.000050603874,0.00007426486,0.000064067215,0.31909066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48030865,0.016223824,0.027493162,0.29242682,0.022233747,0.0007430822,0.00018757053,0.00033105563,0.16005215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836586,0.008663008,0.00058334746,0.0011302567,0.004192978,0.0017716873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836377,0.010093136,0.0007765679,0.0013424264,0.0026302969,0.0015197386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015603425,0.00074503967,0.0008716713,0.0028311508,0.013171163,0.01659194,0.002588852,0.020669421,0.01138082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027098687,0.00048039202,0.0014717935,0.0019783361,0.049181778,0.016292065,0.0074620876,0.020631608,0.0033856765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025369684,0.000007098688,0.000028172546,0.000011676122,8.7747964e-7,0.000022129594,0.00048376241,0.00002471531,0.000010084249,0.98951334,0.008420236,0.0014754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105772515,0.0000058428,0.000059536913,0.000115310126,0.0000019029403,0.0000589784,0.00083497696,0.00015759164,0.000028841092,0.8874809,0.1112382,0.000007375025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074735917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054441704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020669421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014858461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012261684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107806206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252803649","doi":"10.29173/alr1372","title":"Legal Research","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.24755236999644284,"score_gpt":0.5007470153889492,"score_spread":0.25319464539250636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252803649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016159546,0.01955871,0.001004862,0.07920888,0.0071354965,0.00024293832,0.0013769589,0.0002550387,0.8896012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024650373,0.00982054,0.0016052551,0.031067723,0.0031766463,0.00024013263,0.0016138412,0.0001117056,0.9277137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853896,0.0026163226,0.0006117929,0.0016705664,0.007967662,0.001743968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95000684,0.012176586,0.001124269,0.006854512,0.025551949,0.004285864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014041363,0.0008153023,0.0011936158,0.010466172,0.009487335,0.013340949,0.0027791855,0.009293438,0.19238645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04021699,0.0009328013,0.0009869053,0.005891133,0.008404644,0.004038795,0.0029229634,0.0076088537,0.049547642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040263305,0.00007532541,0.0006409151,0.0002266785,0.000019202274,0.00008221159,0.00038324992,0.00008209055,0.00020014802,0.13295965,0.7976129,0.067677386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002235518,0.00001704157,0.0016811199,0.00054428715,0.000024949899,0.000049675567,0.00043058427,0.0000872344,0.00018537734,0.016646383,0.98029894,0.00001200159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18879184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31562686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8112081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02143064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07077211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64359677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252861249","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6253.2012.01742.x","title":"Traditional Knowledge and Humanities: A Perspective by a Blackfoot","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chinese Philosophy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Ohio Humanities","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Digital humanities; Sociology; Humanities; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08576290827200124,"score_gpt":0.3879769039438697,"score_spread":0.30221399567186846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252861249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02560827,0.078906015,0.0062254528,0.7719948,0.0024283645,0.000034366247,0.00006248715,0.000023029826,0.1147171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7478427,0.05320952,0.007344209,0.14096814,0.005235142,0.00013121316,0.000034003817,0.00012036296,0.045114674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767953,0.0014290164,0.00007266783,0.00026200007,0.00031461005,0.00024219148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99249166,0.0059602926,0.00020541596,0.00018935611,0.0006075933,0.00054578495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059243683,0.00056747143,0.0008180478,0.0031832869,0.010060182,0.011987935,0.0012738591,0.0107482,0.004431339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045932312,0.00045810806,0.00038638833,0.0025781437,0.04872564,0.023568142,0.0054513193,0.014050938,0.0005223393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016119886,0.000044029766,0.00022272115,0.000052029874,0.0000038783737,0.000092174465,0.02522651,0.00006246569,0.00006423399,0.9525291,0.015346802,0.006339903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036913792,0.000039614806,0.0005993852,0.0005571656,0.000011250139,0.00018631697,0.033079516,0.00046827664,0.00015992271,0.758677,0.20615582,0.000028875216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019297706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025607774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019297706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070108264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007707392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05086738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253985490","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198724452.003.0035","title":"The Right to Know in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statute; Legislation; Political science; Jurisprudence; Common law; Law; Freedom of information; Position (finance); Economics","score_opus":0.02739981431482593,"score_gpt":0.322948777306729,"score_spread":0.2955489629919031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253985490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03103002,0.009600827,0.0005239654,0.054939248,0.0005471826,0.000044786688,0.00007493082,0.000020261838,0.90321875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5248058,0.01141888,0.0011887498,0.023672737,0.00022080715,0.00005750093,0.00007283412,0.0000538571,0.43850887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679834,0.0004810289,0.000057505138,0.00021721136,0.0013473328,0.0010986086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773186,0.0006965074,0.00008505694,0.0001065133,0.0006846133,0.0006955409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002714211,0.00022863178,0.00035586243,0.0011687129,0.014597675,0.010116879,0.0008040813,0.003044041,0.008190516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003152284,0.00029897003,0.00020065949,0.0018681084,0.019451717,0.0037708678,0.0034146202,0.0059180274,0.0005091931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008075273,0.000015930762,0.00030968932,0.00004010589,0.0000023997713,0.00023820046,0.032163993,0.0000898484,0.00011267848,0.89772356,0.049004827,0.020290742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043805067,0.000007967949,0.0018935454,0.00034083665,0.000004822014,0.000101922764,0.016675854,0.00013015859,0.00014706231,0.03293987,0.9477227,0.00003091947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92591476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96428496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074085236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053739116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09577919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3899064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255014462","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2020.20","title":"Judging Rationally","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminate; Positivism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.048127391765847786,"score_gpt":0.3742530337472996,"score_spread":0.32612564198145183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255014462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053794272,0.0023995896,0.35211557,0.034544513,0.0022492665,0.0005450711,0.0007998956,0.0009969883,0.5525548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8447825,0.0012741182,0.12068864,0.0034065465,0.0011310399,0.00036258987,0.00082613784,0.0002921878,0.027236346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98297775,0.0057595936,0.0013126732,0.0034031498,0.0055075167,0.0010393834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96815085,0.0174776,0.0020784629,0.0046287347,0.0068296925,0.0008347202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101261195,0.0010135102,0.00083450926,0.0018688393,0.0019863804,0.007760642,0.0018290238,0.0032514946,0.01524036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071178086,0.00045639923,0.0008054402,0.0009136848,0.0101340655,0.008038566,0.0028095385,0.0036487665,0.0029866714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011504421,0.000051245577,0.0019383226,0.0002075818,0.00006220296,0.00020174374,0.00087169046,0.0030351637,0.0009844975,0.9366062,0.013037275,0.04288899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040224753,0.000030550586,0.00059277104,0.00014027626,0.000026051674,0.00007592681,0.00037731644,0.008312992,0.0010934817,0.95905745,0.03022966,0.000023266717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004859875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069725355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01524036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029932589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004295572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053552628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255504285","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.26140","title":"Mcmurtry, Hon. (Roland) Roy, (born 31 May 1932), Senior Counsel, Hull &amp; Hull LLP, since 2014; Chief Justice of Ontario, 1996–2007 (Associate Chief Justice, 1991–94, Chief Justice, 1994–96, Ontario Court of Justice (General Division))","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Hull; Law; Management; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.033490307173257565,"score_gpt":0.3334561056208852,"score_spread":0.2999657984476276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255504285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008856446,0.059302762,0.0014104323,0.107367426,0.019183135,0.000197996,0.0064765634,0.00054215966,0.796663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010988521,0.0050446307,0.0001968764,0.0037302882,0.00044662418,0.000029732964,0.00018913114,0.00007115161,0.97930294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996457,0.000032551718,0.000015080749,0.00008267515,0.00014192442,0.00008199047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995994,0.000077793935,0.000028900222,0.000016606195,0.00014467817,0.00013262493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005234722,0.000506091,0.00035411364,0.0010643014,0.0039297533,0.0015548777,0.00093574286,0.0008964558,0.14673351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019816246,0.0003541989,0.00013776626,0.001029491,0.00069518277,0.0013390451,0.0013262363,0.0020604224,0.04928001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014630716,0.0000111501495,0.00028155316,0.00004528913,0.0000011119231,0.0001891779,0.00068950874,0.000023039398,0.00008710282,0.007654318,0.9476354,0.043367695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016911933,0.0000061636565,0.00054983376,0.00003668953,6.9677026e-7,0.00010282956,0.00020203387,0.000010196712,0.000047585578,0.00039276417,0.99864596,0.000003506026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20717245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45881557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79282755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032403371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004503907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4908725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255928898","doi":"10.22215/etd/2012-07073","title":"Law, morality and social discourse : jury nullification in a Canadian context","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Nullification; Morality; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.058408198294557526,"score_gpt":0.43480001768781884,"score_spread":0.37639181939326133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255928898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5696052,0.007843178,0.0015600773,0.15676312,0.0004622215,0.00014028522,0.00050734106,0.000060899794,0.26305777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791661,0.0020824515,0.00067181437,0.0031873377,0.00005278925,0.000035490542,0.00006917021,0.000039926425,0.014694928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779204,0.0052180416,0.0006935872,0.002024551,0.0075775078,0.006565847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94332427,0.023936067,0.0034699612,0.0018739005,0.017412124,0.0099836765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021332651,0.00049354386,0.0011542905,0.0059634256,0.077462025,0.02144631,0.005701456,0.006515393,0.011822793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062244687,0.0009174088,0.0006129117,0.012248179,0.045246862,0.006434221,0.010275005,0.010601474,0.00040790893],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014480656,0.00009864351,0.018316409,0.00018087294,0.000037992908,0.001248356,0.373659,0.00059816625,0.0003355436,0.5368714,0.03250848,0.03600028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009970592,0.00005603011,0.07236639,0.001111689,0.00010641167,0.0003927781,0.55932313,0.0016416911,0.0006821921,0.053703025,0.31004852,0.00046843334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99790204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99884665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34665707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.34665707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.52739155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7577852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255936986","doi":"10.4135/9781483392240.n76","title":"Correctional Service Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"The SAGE Encyclopedia of Criminal Psychology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Geography; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.051442109621985824,"score_gpt":0.3850358573864176,"score_spread":0.3335937477644318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255936986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027598587,0.0019434134,0.00033060607,0.0068735317,0.0021036938,0.00021773261,0.017375315,0.0007292632,0.9676665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002742911,0.0004858901,0.00012709407,0.0006726711,0.000035955905,0.000021923759,0.001154399,0.00012720878,0.994632],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979488,0.00009445577,0.000059176815,0.00026737122,0.00092010637,0.00071011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922018,0.00047068307,0.00018424146,0.0003062139,0.0053093485,0.0015276355],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005285895,0.0010543595,0.0009941331,0.0025368219,0.012381464,0.0057129106,0.0020016485,0.0027940192,0.6182562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052370653,0.0008665204,0.0007209036,0.0040458306,0.0012708592,0.0013696745,0.0019739612,0.002518598,0.26377115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002837907,0.000030221378,0.0009057772,0.00009558109,0.000004496426,0.000102562124,0.000069342095,0.00007567687,0.00006226173,0.0026910885,0.961032,0.034902763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018112854,0.000012341578,0.0047561135,0.00014687589,0.0000056296517,0.000072519986,0.00035098908,0.00015637958,0.00010360584,0.0004180812,0.99394107,0.000018296552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94507825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9837705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97308934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026910657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.122805126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5445112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255938873","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.1021","title":"PHILOSOPHICAL LEGAL ETHICS AND PERSONAL INTEGRITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Democracy; Political science; Legal process; Sociology; Compromise; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.051558578290668754,"score_gpt":0.35012770066188137,"score_spread":0.29856912237121264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255938873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014481927,0.038261723,0.01640026,0.21868223,0.0010493941,0.000043875654,0.000052286265,0.000054266853,0.7109739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86060464,0.016533844,0.0071044206,0.03655156,0.0023000361,0.00017766921,0.00006354129,0.0001100858,0.076554194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892384,0.006959321,0.0002794246,0.0007513189,0.0017767451,0.0009948271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99485993,0.0028849565,0.00043361145,0.00064646587,0.0006579514,0.00051711453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073846485,0.00055269094,0.00050729024,0.0019079535,0.0100368075,0.009668367,0.0013197818,0.00916062,0.007760305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009879184,0.00038679613,0.0005786717,0.0015988293,0.08007752,0.012549552,0.0070439703,0.008406655,0.0014855363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001277464,0.000003750159,0.000033096887,0.000010998453,8.7783906e-7,0.00001562258,0.002455516,0.0000342372,0.00001283469,0.9936651,0.002365134,0.0014015354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044790536,0.000005832352,0.00008883522,0.0001337305,0.0000013170893,0.00007056914,0.0018256449,0.00010318136,0.000043826236,0.89655024,0.10116703,0.0000052731775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003782567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002564459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0100368075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009032031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046928725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06553227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255978256","doi":"10.14296/ac.v2003i47.1034","title":"Laying the foundations for law library co-operation around the world","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Amicus Curiae","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Starr Foundation","keywords":"Law library; Event (particle physics); Gee; Law; Library science; Information transfer; Engineering; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.067824577490244,"score_gpt":0.40590736101194114,"score_spread":0.33808278352169713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255978256","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009462869,0.0036565214,0.016097143,0.7704239,0.0024943657,0.00016770199,0.00003550361,0.0003893024,0.19727275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7692361,0.005628371,0.027943114,0.08558312,0.0023513054,0.00087708235,0.00012834722,0.0006235635,0.10762898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9548839,0.028265262,0.00129067,0.0026268756,0.0057065766,0.0072268173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9073239,0.030494232,0.004741619,0.0070744404,0.019135796,0.03122999],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043553855,0.000497709,0.0006802833,0.004145533,0.02670906,0.052909307,0.002894809,0.018288303,0.033013824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09401694,0.0009295794,0.000588505,0.0040235803,0.037070975,0.049540523,0.03258555,0.016844163,0.009421926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046740362,0.00015105885,0.001864812,0.0001803481,0.000022084228,0.0002312092,0.03028536,0.00042864628,0.00023388668,0.683624,0.19587374,0.0870581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051546212,0.0000749163,0.0013498632,0.00068165996,0.0000152115645,0.0000900553,0.07393632,0.00048192812,0.00032913525,0.2820491,0.64087206,0.00006827786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01693151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020106385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9470907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018298281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07838976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23033756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280572051","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v13i1.14603","title":"Jury Strikes Back","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Economic Justice; Jury trial; Political science; Civil procedure; Pandemic; Law; Criminology; Public administration; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.12184795208378905,"score_gpt":0.4381770377505677,"score_spread":0.31632908566677864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280572051","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029075917,0.00713622,0.0028350225,0.48685947,0.012955725,0.0004133995,0.001359633,0.00031147266,0.45905316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35641786,0.005683752,0.0023652292,0.24381788,0.004280156,0.0003135032,0.00094161445,0.00026237665,0.38591766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97965336,0.0031494522,0.0010720481,0.002453081,0.00901881,0.004653168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733194,0.0063047213,0.0011054877,0.0022452152,0.011278986,0.005746057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016287383,0.00048101126,0.0012648767,0.0016848545,0.02370687,0.010230798,0.0044284286,0.011814073,0.046565626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06493712,0.00068983994,0.00095662056,0.0015611871,0.01111318,0.004191441,0.0059873555,0.012414182,0.0062973993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026613765,0.00006592899,0.006071177,0.00028339366,0.000064276086,0.0009969218,0.0055812434,0.0003343632,0.0004593568,0.22691345,0.7050575,0.05390624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010282874,0.00011083459,0.00875959,0.0006026027,0.000054599484,0.00022130703,0.0043139323,0.00030355487,0.00052152807,0.019018486,0.9659168,0.00007384408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66097724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8167622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66097724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06229866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114480026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68203866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281682254","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7284","title":"Practising an Anti-Colonial Citizenship Education Through a Blended Learning Course on Aboriginal Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Citizenship; Colonialism; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.06902634390145324,"score_gpt":0.45732634177729153,"score_spread":0.3882999978758383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281682254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9119413,0.00027477532,0.010494046,0.0030919716,0.0002640284,0.001208748,0.000065333305,0.0002745414,0.0723852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8939749,0.0009825956,0.03898749,0.0015103451,0.00010637038,0.00066599395,0.00013889397,0.0000535814,0.06357981],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990017,0.00027834778,0.00003725378,0.00013521775,0.000236651,0.00031083284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798334,0.000443444,0.00010449322,0.00014046305,0.00021275775,0.0011155792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024553323,0.0006031116,0.00039193415,0.00067468255,0.003805033,0.0037603106,0.0017945219,0.0014764245,0.007832761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023280669,0.00025401128,0.00043364844,0.00043663313,0.0018814416,0.0017645076,0.004936734,0.002109442,0.0020556776],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004165266,0.0510807,0.01808933,0.000899531,0.000034803175,0.005740721,0.24655364,0.0026812172,0.03360591,0.020750053,0.024104893,0.59604263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042944684,0.018754937,0.073103786,0.001714151,0.00010870186,0.0047129537,0.34349373,0.012892568,0.045219768,0.021132542,0.4781499,0.00028757774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032420442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009779987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007832761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019165357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005352628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026203215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281772468","doi":"10.7202/1089685ar","title":"\"Let Us See What Is Meant by the Word Recorde\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archivaria","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Scope (computer science); History; Point (geometry); Historical record; Perception; Sociology; Law; Media studies; Political science; Epistemology; Biography; Art history","score_opus":0.03746755535791548,"score_gpt":0.35271877134794855,"score_spread":0.3152512159900331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281772468","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023114417,0.063311525,0.027204089,0.52575713,0.020187145,0.00006367567,0.00055132323,0.00019793215,0.33961266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7458768,0.047886908,0.011808818,0.08475344,0.010009171,0.00029112573,0.00048117177,0.0005959839,0.09829657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886193,0.0074753277,0.00044980238,0.0007346776,0.0020191972,0.0007017025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98884165,0.006847637,0.00075462094,0.0010480032,0.002116115,0.00039189632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007349489,0.0005550306,0.0007230675,0.0023715522,0.008380576,0.012021869,0.0016166838,0.0045480262,0.0054483265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026937328,0.00025204636,0.00041876774,0.0030962995,0.047330406,0.024383185,0.004955424,0.0095996,0.0022932931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027167685,0.000008579777,0.0005215537,0.00017796211,0.000006111934,0.0001576884,0.07547156,0.0000338126,0.00015954443,0.8642739,0.046479512,0.012682557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072031185,0.00003072508,0.0007414192,0.0009997064,0.000008556264,0.00046708397,0.057924543,0.00007152849,0.0003450732,0.11515621,0.82421345,0.000034547902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017422026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015039329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017422026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039280816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045285393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038868308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283311748","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.06","title":"Power, Gender, and Race in the Legal Profession","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Caucus; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Race (biology); Power (physics); Event (particle physics); Law; Political science; History; Gender studies; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.04146646887058816,"score_gpt":0.32968739872032826,"score_spread":0.2882209298497401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283311748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2226191,0.010517803,0.00072157785,0.1035756,0.0009466559,0.000027218006,0.00007188641,0.000012916234,0.6615071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498546,0.0018913392,0.00014474851,0.0036338775,0.00020459275,0.000024178787,0.0000079612055,0.00001735382,0.044221167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956559,0.0023503806,0.000057600064,0.00025429807,0.0007575506,0.0009242997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968995,0.0014535547,0.00028528308,0.00007318351,0.00036262104,0.0009259189],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003963405,0.00015502803,0.0002725719,0.0012422245,0.014248736,0.0068535395,0.0005008247,0.0011547381,0.016147614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008997542,0.00013770189,0.00013674083,0.001142695,0.017157473,0.0036365949,0.003596313,0.0018253304,0.0009176605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006675277,0.000071946044,0.012077549,0.00006372279,0.000006992111,0.000350465,0.3240147,0.000045376928,0.00021329008,0.5866435,0.03270702,0.043738727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002593418,0.00006947671,0.026247157,0.00068677467,0.000011932106,0.00029562553,0.4838901,0.0001260132,0.00017330931,0.11292141,0.3755198,0.000032492662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074846245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15565166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9857513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060764677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00911399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14882118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283317485","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.1.04","title":"What Do You Call an Indigenous Woman with a PhD in Law? Resisting the Subjugation of Indigenous Expertise in Legal Spheres","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenization; Colonialism; Legal education; Racism; Decolonization; Sociology; Law; Traditional knowledge; Political science; Anthropology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03228845169723625,"score_gpt":0.3020444394008083,"score_spread":0.269755987703572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283317485","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27025005,0.009147238,0.0017515651,0.6354822,0.008966231,0.00010216502,0.00004676724,0.00009864584,0.074155055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7897752,0.011805134,0.0021931408,0.1013495,0.0018974585,0.00009474444,0.000024698646,0.000103606064,0.09275659],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807763,0.0006807871,0.000040387094,0.00016770855,0.00046151996,0.0005720399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975805,0.0004884388,0.00019074239,0.00005925932,0.00035792965,0.0013230036],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021652882,0.00030141533,0.0004861773,0.00074340386,0.024863614,0.004190814,0.0012417691,0.0039763167,0.0041412497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008225199,0.0002902859,0.00034441243,0.00061569246,0.012739657,0.005545177,0.004088054,0.008944229,0.0011794105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027788014,0.0001096922,0.006069527,0.0001331566,0.000009649844,0.011075157,0.88011336,0.000049189268,0.0010459459,0.021280643,0.050507575,0.029578293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004015077,0.00007922905,0.0022592351,0.0002735949,0.000010017635,0.006709519,0.8174095,0.00009174066,0.0002351452,0.002892796,0.16999301,0.00004216114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06437753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10671114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9751364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004752506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008540983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12800568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283817272","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v31i1.6441","title":"What Can the Legal Profession Do For Us? Formerly Incarcerated Attorneys and the Practice of Law as a Strengths-Based Endeavour","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal profession; Practice of law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02558640163852531,"score_gpt":0.39227097272191586,"score_spread":0.36668457108339053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283817272","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01805881,0.007128654,0.0005483869,0.95497847,0.0024562224,0.000014598199,0.0000070557885,0.00002902559,0.01677875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7060364,0.02446675,0.0043128026,0.23303954,0.0028618872,0.00013794164,0.000033735585,0.000066831,0.02904408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883612,0.006446491,0.00024853816,0.00068575173,0.0014077415,0.002850288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709259,0.0065199547,0.0019859893,0.0009884704,0.002805238,0.016774347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013670968,0.0004101541,0.00067867606,0.0017919972,0.022182263,0.019970281,0.0020931999,0.014812388,0.0049786493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028071543,0.00033859428,0.00072656025,0.00078516966,0.040338535,0.026544975,0.012228586,0.017141012,0.0021192871],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007138784,0.0009690547,0.01054467,0.00081572356,0.00002775844,0.0016720562,0.31465253,0.00014791724,0.0007133739,0.3403265,0.1681676,0.16189142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003658728,0.00021920612,0.00446636,0.0028666942,0.000017678032,0.001145081,0.45403746,0.00022694225,0.00037081933,0.11627428,0.42022458,0.00011432353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016503176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028307581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022182263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00832016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040371615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07229984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284889561","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7389","title":"Integrating Social Work Within Legal Clinics: An Inter-Professional Perspective to Address Social-Legal Needs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ontario Trillium Foundation","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Social work; Public relations; Legal profession; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.08879246285694156,"score_gpt":0.45659572673884535,"score_spread":0.36780326388190376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284889561","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2206953,0.012079862,0.015998147,0.448436,0.005720195,0.0005403666,0.000058914087,0.00028110523,0.29619008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9069644,0.008740176,0.01603441,0.025278024,0.0015424017,0.0003488826,0.000041848645,0.00012687492,0.04092295],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870366,0.008316973,0.00021462643,0.00051030423,0.0015460636,0.002375432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865355,0.002947387,0.0006059273,0.0004150301,0.0009358794,0.008560311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008689559,0.00038711468,0.0003629264,0.00183743,0.02050344,0.011826287,0.0028450533,0.004670116,0.01013329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006445415,0.0003451094,0.00041891247,0.0011255211,0.016541809,0.0066562705,0.018530063,0.008006144,0.0011441502],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003065502,0.0015509326,0.0078088082,0.00067546935,0.000027586797,0.0031038125,0.5955278,0.00026284475,0.0010710062,0.10341243,0.062166996,0.22436157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031793476,0.00038907607,0.006690808,0.0010239044,0.000015095902,0.0019020906,0.62031186,0.00023153165,0.00023795608,0.03082486,0.33829182,0.000049225182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072640567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038978774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02050344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006912386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0378374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050153077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285025152","doi":"10.22215/etd/2022-15063","title":"Unsettling the Settler Colonial Structure of Canadian Legal Education: An Examination of Three Law Schools’ Engagement with Reconciliation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Indigenous; Political science; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Legal history; Racism; Geography","score_opus":0.037770980688423716,"score_gpt":0.349256136148216,"score_spread":0.3114851554597923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285025152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92479974,0.00079669995,0.00019867416,0.01295745,0.000101503036,0.00013720372,0.00010103019,0.000017315362,0.060890205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98919123,0.0005457825,0.00020525619,0.0018061651,0.00001394244,0.000038034574,0.00005200064,0.000021823429,0.008125712],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.988425,0.0019283672,0.00019527353,0.0007849339,0.0034694278,0.005197109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859124,0.0027563774,0.0010558331,0.00041052455,0.004440527,0.0054243277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008124312,0.00039093816,0.00068137073,0.0038753652,0.08789968,0.012553707,0.0036117637,0.002719706,0.0062605594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015166426,0.00067428756,0.00046423892,0.00568173,0.025266275,0.003446941,0.010445101,0.0068070283,0.00026860856],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037961043,0.000096970754,0.021656942,0.00007225413,0.000011620139,0.00042244673,0.9432223,0.00004395372,0.00033884132,0.015565081,0.005056016,0.013475671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000974617,0.00003004449,0.06080424,0.0001420097,0.000011512634,0.00007178967,0.8864201,0.0000878256,0.000099250654,0.00056150765,0.051720288,0.000041822263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8097523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1902477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23666698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9391979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285223880","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_32","title":"Correction to: Academic Integrity in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yorkville University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Personal Integrity; Structural integrity; Scientific integrity; Political science; Engineering ethics; Library science; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11757264422837024,"score_gpt":0.42325951147802565,"score_spread":0.30568686724965544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285223880","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004331243,0.0048868055,0.000949773,0.30778193,0.56041455,0.00020206315,0.007023276,0.0014043202,0.116904214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012494331,0.0072637564,0.0021736121,0.0719019,0.03206692,0.00020232478,0.0038560063,0.0010612035,0.86897993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824264,0.0009811646,0.0011494608,0.0013584667,0.011598458,0.0024860837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92028624,0.003828854,0.0014611898,0.0033068617,0.066608585,0.004508265],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004903479,0.0015251639,0.0022821657,0.0043367203,0.0146420775,0.0133359805,0.0059866034,0.0108679095,0.17476116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07109874,0.00090833864,0.001303315,0.0066446275,0.007438843,0.0032350235,0.0042468286,0.014214738,0.09401156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001908315,0.0000010696912,0.00002943983,0.000027984404,0.0000015453904,0.00003921216,0.000041573952,0.000008634115,0.000005211596,0.0010683532,0.99608886,0.0026862368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034850711,0.0000020822597,0.00024288081,0.00015564516,0.0000040058717,0.000081861464,0.00016582536,0.000039822535,0.000050945895,0.000447313,0.99879175,0.000014285071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73496556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80569494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044505306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14300075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5846343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285655012","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.12911000.v1","title":"Modulating the Depth of Scrutiny in Judicial Review: Scope, Grounds, Intensity, Context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Home Office; University of Cambridge; McGill University","keywords":"Scrutiny; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Intensity (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; History; Computer science; Optics; Physics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.1605661895775027,"score_gpt":0.4350352372672065,"score_spread":0.2744690476897038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285655012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7190644,0.007088519,0.087472364,0.011031179,0.00064453215,0.0013901648,0.0011590454,0.0006183898,0.17153148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868494,0.00082815,0.008602917,0.00051355525,0.00016917434,0.00022372752,0.00008242808,0.000067894594,0.0026627148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789322,0.009868856,0.0018002593,0.0020706023,0.0060706344,0.0012574046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92358583,0.058322866,0.0074119396,0.005852894,0.0035321543,0.0012943669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016531216,0.0004051246,0.0008858695,0.0015054854,0.0009938584,0.005802524,0.0011915001,0.0029115027,0.009973065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09635768,0.00070938066,0.00084708905,0.0015754888,0.0028561552,0.005036123,0.0034134001,0.0019123598,0.0013760653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005103055,0.0012020944,0.04874852,0.0032394284,0.0005676949,0.0006127156,0.0061929724,0.01267478,0.1452612,0.39062843,0.009839414,0.37592977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019259113,0.00706376,0.1581224,0.003175818,0.0015162393,0.001018655,0.0039772643,0.04635793,0.14750332,0.5408899,0.08785739,0.0005914157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007243165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013216202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016531216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024359028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023678693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08742648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286009277","doi":"10.29173/wclawr69","title":"The Reliability of Expert Evidence in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Federal Rules of Evidence; Conviction; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Accountability; Public relations; Engineering","score_opus":0.0852581681269184,"score_gpt":0.3916854446548383,"score_spread":0.3064272765279199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286009277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19350399,0.077795036,0.02193576,0.30430606,0.002053914,0.00088664284,0.0023337658,0.0003840758,0.3968008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96650964,0.01075487,0.00526348,0.007594309,0.00030731809,0.00008028371,0.0002652744,0.000080137455,0.009144687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.80843383,0.03279521,0.010898203,0.010576745,0.12420259,0.0130934045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38487825,0.20357123,0.031171434,0.014180668,0.35538396,0.010814402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11261731,0.00033381363,0.0015078031,0.017202567,0.012033592,0.022000836,0.005537924,0.0035167548,0.003324791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38351506,0.0011857107,0.0007203961,0.014849837,0.02091376,0.005293417,0.0071730097,0.0045041316,0.00034546095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033626554,0.000083352934,0.1539931,0.0030074127,0.0005289781,0.0024732626,0.044335164,0.008050994,0.001436904,0.34697804,0.105109684,0.3336669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001606531,0.00019345005,0.31791836,0.01050284,0.00063477276,0.00091609784,0.030110987,0.008743113,0.004104215,0.08204394,0.54379284,0.00087875675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9762042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97867066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19400297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19400297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.378521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9348423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287183108","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4750519","title":"+27789189922 Win court cases with powerful effective spells &amp; get back your lover in,Churchill Dauphin Flin Flon Kildonan Saint Boniface Swan River Thompson Winnipeg York Factory","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; Factory (object-oriented programming); Management; History; Art history; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05483008121982439,"score_gpt":0.31743149516120706,"score_spread":0.26260141394138264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287183108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078499655,0.00019585117,0.00011515606,0.0021544814,0.0008848903,0.000095605756,0.00044896844,0.00020034888,0.9951198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014072678,0.000087234686,0.000040772185,0.0007439474,0.00008127841,0.000020427302,0.00014678623,0.00007131359,0.997401],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990871,0.000061308136,0.000026173755,0.00011288019,0.0003791128,0.00033347643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825686,0.00012907588,0.00004993266,0.00008493694,0.0006712171,0.0008079971],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005152618,0.0007462864,0.00038720493,0.000827199,0.0059810476,0.0035574413,0.0010354335,0.0027209285,0.85416764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022503822,0.00057199376,0.00043794746,0.0005440704,0.00050752284,0.0015288506,0.0029515324,0.00248825,0.5836788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009861273,0.000018994184,0.000118738,0.000012578718,8.401521e-7,0.00008875205,0.00003163037,0.000012191548,0.00010932619,0.00080060837,0.9882086,0.010587884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013009737,0.00001344381,0.000903255,0.000032494656,0.0000018268163,0.00008766206,0.00025633944,0.000048367427,0.000077391385,0.00015195679,0.99840933,0.0000049722275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04582811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17213243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14583236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025317979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028623913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20801216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288401483","doi":"","title":"\"Transysstemic Programme at McGill and the De-nationalization of Legal Education\"","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.022228732732592283,"score_gpt":0.29625473431146343,"score_spread":0.27402600157887114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288401483","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14204283,0.0053991624,0.0018019344,0.613744,0.002797358,0.00029529576,0.001980315,0.00022808289,0.2317111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67042553,0.0013065862,0.0030171836,0.05201843,0.00033600547,0.0003351114,0.00075783,0.00011783221,0.27168557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933095,0.0019331878,0.0000998957,0.0004056232,0.0010233455,0.0032284528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892569,0.0017226582,0.00067641475,0.000526968,0.0015833,0.006233633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007421966,0.00033245084,0.00024534258,0.0009800238,0.004940209,0.0037767782,0.0015084314,0.0034742397,0.026070382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014038446,0.00025436512,0.00031604766,0.0010296622,0.0029598007,0.0024756524,0.0077500157,0.0042772763,0.00087295956],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037054133,0.0001883835,0.00991603,0.00020821989,0.000026302352,0.00043643304,0.007310677,0.00028614214,0.0015216974,0.6654068,0.24973854,0.06459022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020955775,0.00022864903,0.1389353,0.0003534772,0.000035135763,0.0001786221,0.0061644493,0.0008963521,0.0021211444,0.02346354,0.8273243,0.0000894851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43352312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.649419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026130084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09300363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86199945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289450564","doi":"10.7202/1090693ar","title":"Réglementation et innovation dans le secteur juridique : les Alternative Business Structures dans le Legal Services Act 2007","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02238493158247224,"score_gpt":0.3156676177696979,"score_spread":0.29328268618722564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289450564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3598744,0.0035208403,0.010579034,0.10519345,0.00048561417,0.00040913722,0.00050021807,0.00014156864,0.5192958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89143753,0.0013746454,0.0051539675,0.008315634,0.00018234849,0.00024334696,0.0001723585,0.000033086108,0.093087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98302805,0.004209566,0.00056955364,0.0013161526,0.006782055,0.0040946743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98442394,0.0059969802,0.0018893763,0.0011683071,0.0036341068,0.0028873237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009131197,0.00028548745,0.0003333493,0.0018052282,0.010417827,0.01161034,0.0020737753,0.005364288,0.009019571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021192975,0.00055445905,0.0006097909,0.0024308236,0.011778044,0.0036072428,0.0054651704,0.006739973,0.00096350105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006009943,0.0000757231,0.011347103,0.000095130155,0.000020380927,0.0003731388,0.01790986,0.0013762546,0.0006441453,0.9290859,0.01335571,0.025656583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014477389,0.00025173687,0.07045036,0.0011727161,0.00010434377,0.00038875526,0.03036627,0.0037143657,0.0019497768,0.07811155,0.8131179,0.00022753445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.506704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6158343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.506704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040429395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0841906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290190544","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4179703","title":"Civil Lay Judges: A Global Overview","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03437606613178686,"score_gpt":0.37625993770371785,"score_spread":0.341883871571931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290190544","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055229045,0.90254956,0.0010327613,0.052736185,0.0012072799,0.00003294819,0.0003366941,0.0000617771,0.036519818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07720162,0.89392734,0.0010511847,0.014467665,0.0055065798,0.000064266795,0.000444521,0.00009253598,0.00724425],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966421,0.0009706794,0.0003126963,0.0004860194,0.00095309655,0.0006353607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99136895,0.0047271233,0.0009613497,0.0002306523,0.0017343028,0.0009775695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048744786,0.00093459425,0.0014002401,0.014201568,0.0021460268,0.009783313,0.0010407453,0.0061303945,0.0086229835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074429032,0.0009588402,0.00067134947,0.018888764,0.006027512,0.008611586,0.004597716,0.0054143206,0.0018094892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018243541,0.00025608597,0.013616894,0.006226808,0.00009453439,0.00042118446,0.0038508212,0.0005509561,0.00035921574,0.09423394,0.19386148,0.6863457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044674496,0.000127722,0.039388824,0.011939131,0.00013499655,0.0011710636,0.0053648953,0.00029693506,0.00019550811,0.027562048,0.91372174,0.000052473213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064298417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015744416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014201568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046586175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00938069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03380084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293205783","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4060297","title":"What is Scholarly Legal Writing? An Introduction to Different Perspectives (On US Qualified Immunity Doctrine) (Presentation Slides)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Doctrine; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.027662464424988008,"score_gpt":0.37680801121961977,"score_spread":0.3491455467946318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293205783","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004361249,0.32699853,0.014031607,0.37976247,0.047226794,0.00014765571,0.00056815945,0.00026800047,0.22663553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13912134,0.36563748,0.028193517,0.12308901,0.16169788,0.0010000729,0.0013607867,0.0007655162,0.17913441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724835,0.0012396174,0.00026557574,0.00023658873,0.0007703605,0.00023943235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849027,0.012930875,0.00034251926,0.0002738404,0.0009315385,0.00061858364],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051671476,0.0005361085,0.00071372493,0.008037551,0.004861951,0.016879404,0.0014768724,0.00644934,0.02326933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011542063,0.0005092441,0.0006903674,0.0075852345,0.012705164,0.014828438,0.005242685,0.007617204,0.0038692201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022527654,0.000055432793,0.0002503087,0.0006057358,0.0000060015927,0.0001190838,0.0059029376,0.00010523791,0.0003141187,0.63164294,0.2556456,0.10533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006343444,0.000023337463,0.00085723813,0.0020610979,0.000005611053,0.00019759433,0.0057412623,0.00013615447,0.0001383247,0.17158602,0.8192242,0.000022778011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022427165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042234156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9831206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004028137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034049207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077843666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294351289","doi":"10.36834/cmej.75111","title":"Going virtual advances justice in expected and unexpected ways","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Education Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Computer science; Criminology; Data science; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.022034035285432477,"score_gpt":0.35542022755876446,"score_spread":0.333386192273332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294351289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008726568,0.0090161655,0.0055168727,0.4122781,0.0066776867,0.000026806834,0.000100942045,0.00022105119,0.55743587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70988196,0.01358695,0.005888754,0.15450545,0.006178156,0.00008470825,0.000116903524,0.00043449676,0.10932259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988294,0.0051472806,0.00024177931,0.0006210099,0.0037018438,0.001994147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829965,0.009336693,0.0010489285,0.0013142441,0.00170003,0.0036035657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008402983,0.00035142136,0.00039574847,0.001279923,0.01019332,0.017789477,0.0013308477,0.008060394,0.038094178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032403484,0.00028837982,0.00052998745,0.0010373065,0.019928196,0.020876061,0.014369242,0.0077650687,0.004465507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005190341,0.00011913849,0.0011074311,0.00018207972,0.000024850362,0.0002696,0.0068623247,0.00025087877,0.0002063403,0.6893571,0.22830959,0.07325873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025363606,0.000076084325,0.0014716019,0.0006122676,0.000032845586,0.00037815006,0.010325433,0.0003636932,0.00040422863,0.34232074,0.6439373,0.000052286105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011602096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03730056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038094178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005835494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012488912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12743777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294903864","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-11810-4_8","title":"Vulnerability and Student Perceptions of the Ethics of SoTL","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Context (archaeology); Perception; Power (physics); Research ethics; Sociology; Population; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Geography; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.133501359647462,"score_gpt":0.4709957454339686,"score_spread":0.3374943857865066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294903864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9341276,0.00028912965,0.0006448455,0.008339454,0.00006390361,0.000033870787,0.000017939745,0.000009683933,0.0564735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559206,0.0001400443,0.0001157986,0.00038057318,0.000011498091,0.000013725344,0.000006830257,0.00000784311,0.0037316508],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98637587,0.007954386,0.0004892317,0.00041505834,0.0030840738,0.0016814016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651591,0.016006036,0.0067551453,0.00082469947,0.0037764877,0.0074785366],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010365232,0.0002697475,0.00040784403,0.0017952456,0.0072868075,0.01496204,0.00086344243,0.002668313,0.0073660454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033532344,0.00037804944,0.00043725438,0.00080143264,0.011117195,0.0055863163,0.007460442,0.008319016,0.00066483114],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001911863,0.00079645385,0.14068472,0.00012474945,0.000048583068,0.00058578426,0.74495864,0.00038175186,0.0011499447,0.08521937,0.0050784224,0.020780478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018336668,0.00015678839,0.053445477,0.00025759026,0.000025062489,0.00046494618,0.8977399,0.0010956266,0.00058398576,0.02165835,0.024480717,0.0000733143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005922815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009049083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041479394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043548294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05481726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295207474","doi":"10.32843/2663-6085/2022/49.2.23","title":"FEATURES OF FUTURE LAWYERS’ PRACTICAL TRAINING AT THE UNIVERSITIES OF CANADA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Innovate Pedagogy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Training (meteorology); Political science; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering; Geography; Medicine; Meteorology","score_opus":0.05646636160914772,"score_gpt":0.3964863275569627,"score_spread":0.34001996594781503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295207474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77881736,0.0004991444,0.0016056406,0.020452091,0.00033235824,0.0003326365,0.00093387894,0.00051620346,0.19651072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9126307,0.00020410716,0.001857555,0.0006921121,0.000042689,0.000054657008,0.00034678963,0.000059598868,0.084111795],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740773,0.00026265736,0.000037280493,0.00017129134,0.000693388,0.0014275688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98285735,0.0013279876,0.00038553326,0.00030419935,0.0031151231,0.01200983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001661715,0.00021936151,0.00018807178,0.0014829829,0.010064718,0.0032223293,0.0017658335,0.002087545,0.023947118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063299625,0.00032759304,0.00023340007,0.0021096345,0.0021406156,0.0008454049,0.0022056596,0.0018375218,0.0021649245],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006597883,0.0026599236,0.10519896,0.00042873918,0.000029156901,0.0037097156,0.09331273,0.0046206475,0.007548804,0.029265476,0.3046722,0.4478939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008556926,0.00037193476,0.48067725,0.00019813671,0.000011574137,0.0010035782,0.118397586,0.002751041,0.001905157,0.0033461347,0.39114407,0.00010788853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92787963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9698888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03011118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058673996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61761594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297147906","doi":"10.1353/rhe.2022.0014","title":"Exploring the Impact of GRE-Accepting Admissions on Law School Diversity and Selectivity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Racial diversity; Standardized test; Test (biology); Racial bias; Race (biology); Law; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics education; Ethnic group; Racism; History; Gender studies","score_opus":0.1192802836214255,"score_gpt":0.4393192091846614,"score_spread":0.3200389255632359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297147906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7650899,0.12878887,0.006854575,0.039260205,0.0014234585,0.0006207484,0.0025759235,0.00008769104,0.055298667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686886,0.02263276,0.0021317701,0.0034090257,0.0003644579,0.00031545685,0.00045692126,0.000023749442,0.0019772733],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9703048,0.018811135,0.0018526157,0.0014317003,0.0057869516,0.0018128757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87356246,0.08354119,0.02631633,0.0028847482,0.009938747,0.0037565997],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019799372,0.00028278932,0.0007426006,0.002554002,0.00093571475,0.0027369407,0.0014120647,0.00094933517,0.007913443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11184361,0.00020860882,0.0016527583,0.0043568476,0.0017399788,0.0021000968,0.0030364608,0.0018008865,0.00052729266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005527966,0.0005879447,0.45991173,0.010208914,0.001862662,0.00023456804,0.0040256185,0.0017773773,0.0005931055,0.028704448,0.008655627,0.48288518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008106024,0.0009558052,0.9385398,0.007714299,0.0012027005,0.00014730632,0.0048793363,0.00081230147,0.0008477726,0.0075012064,0.037260354,0.00005794297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015690064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033389885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98020065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030362643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009205381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10471028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297470743","doi":"10.1017/9781009063814.012","title":"Narratives of Court Crises","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Political science; History; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.0676948639303214,"score_gpt":0.3041610098393977,"score_spread":0.2364661459090763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297470743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18353608,0.012929578,0.0029350535,0.034373503,0.0005591081,0.00010959422,0.00040017063,0.00007318395,0.76508385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9264959,0.008244119,0.000949558,0.0019942692,0.00023223118,0.000121693956,0.00020880575,0.00009424798,0.061659064],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970503,0.0017319327,0.00011468908,0.00018198934,0.0006518302,0.00026931087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665856,0.0022942794,0.00027416772,0.00014695448,0.00022551647,0.00040049554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024213053,0.0005975888,0.00037744173,0.0021226793,0.012072578,0.009607655,0.001090832,0.0023044706,0.0073307445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006863268,0.00028227834,0.00018353293,0.0029865196,0.017547455,0.008295132,0.008097628,0.00398203,0.00077517045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019721803,0.000010455488,0.00033276388,0.000110133326,0.0000028598386,0.0009954734,0.68294066,0.00011439403,0.00029559765,0.29531056,0.012865396,0.00700204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006759501,0.000009245047,0.00061531697,0.00058156374,0.0000034936777,0.00079252775,0.42064688,0.00017961972,0.00032187323,0.037526596,0.5393004,0.000015695041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007867947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011753481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012072578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009791682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035697746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07104397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299908467","doi":"10.1353/book.20786","title":"Sexual Assault in Canada : Law, Legal Practice and Women's Activism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Sexual violence; Political science; State (computer science); Face (sociological concept); Law; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Gender studies; Poison control; Medicine; Social science; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.02623211642405565,"score_gpt":0.27233821968696936,"score_spread":0.2461061032629137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299908467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02900417,0.14858982,0.0004247005,0.084420376,0.0031830645,0.00010050787,0.0005324401,0.00010727982,0.7336377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22725742,0.113492444,0.0009304422,0.010478358,0.0006290742,0.00008538783,0.00044393973,0.000079187506,0.6466038],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856794,0.000089178735,0.000020217678,0.00006462714,0.00081605796,0.0004419733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895006,0.00016692767,0.00004390555,0.000018990491,0.0004068874,0.00041317832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006240883,0.0005014361,0.0003745315,0.0021662146,0.018153153,0.006649942,0.0012887679,0.0020916625,0.011133142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017959286,0.00029572385,0.00027617396,0.006110299,0.006910203,0.0011788602,0.0018755229,0.0020548522,0.0008069055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016794867,0.000047032616,0.0028799446,0.00039527795,0.0000068258514,0.00045133338,0.054386795,0.0005099172,0.00028592,0.16663146,0.62182736,0.15256132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003130929,0.0000069521675,0.006617279,0.00037650383,0.0000046964205,0.00012529374,0.016313588,0.00010310765,0.00006086109,0.0019722462,0.97439945,0.000016850026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15023302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15023302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27509594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98560923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300027340","doi":"10.24310/rejie.2010.v0i1.7947","title":"The preparation of legal reports: their rediscovery in the light of the acquisition and development of competences","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Jurídica de Investigación e Innovación Educativa (REJIE Nueva Época)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Social skills; Knowledge management; Team development; Dreyfus model of skill acquisition; Plan (archaeology); Process management; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.022594986493836934,"score_gpt":0.34275327393889543,"score_spread":0.3201582874450585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300027340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3179212,0.009730996,0.18540543,0.048747502,0.005219071,0.0028935284,0.0006460948,0.0020720381,0.4273641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79332346,0.004093973,0.12348617,0.0020452528,0.0013757366,0.0007078464,0.0002574472,0.00040953787,0.07430057],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696623,0.021081459,0.0015465572,0.0010344591,0.0061680577,0.00050720247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81089073,0.11112064,0.024611948,0.024157384,0.02530589,0.003913373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034653626,0.0005172269,0.0002966809,0.0044211834,0.0024036088,0.008889961,0.0015482479,0.0014800675,0.012341812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19064434,0.00043409702,0.00046001835,0.0019423742,0.004162726,0.0061639682,0.0037900729,0.0025511808,0.0045363316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029122285,0.0003325514,0.016505783,0.0008853989,0.000025462039,0.0013795827,0.073999755,0.00023768257,0.008264986,0.14193213,0.02512567,0.73101974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008894728,0.0007416651,0.0386591,0.0024213742,0.00015249025,0.0070922566,0.08739034,0.0024559565,0.032931905,0.057796173,0.7700126,0.00025723688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013798375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024297303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034653626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016333114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072901268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18326807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301006991","doi":"10.46692/9781447332978.015","title":"The impact of training and coaching on the development of practice skills in youth justice: findings from Australia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coaching; Economic Justice; Psychology; Training (meteorology); Positive Youth Development; Applied psychology; Medical education; Political science; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Geography; Psychotherapist; Law","score_opus":0.14615536436532306,"score_gpt":0.4716895235450135,"score_spread":0.3255341591796904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301006991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792541,0.014475562,0.00020984557,0.0012091503,0.000056222347,0.00017605453,0.00018329537,0.000005800944,0.00442994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875738,0.010111461,0.0006581291,0.0005148614,0.000033454504,0.00014337161,0.00006951291,0.00000577948,0.0008895031],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974477,0.00090104784,0.0003979363,0.00022457342,0.00070702884,0.00032163318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912594,0.0029195044,0.0020807588,0.0001892899,0.002585223,0.0009656782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003373307,0.00023340232,0.0006929005,0.0020846645,0.0013698719,0.0014818566,0.00062718836,0.0005295885,0.0017291353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013385681,0.00027805747,0.000757782,0.0021012132,0.00086582714,0.001079098,0.0020316269,0.00079848187,0.00011544104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004942771,0.0010609236,0.5338031,0.015586411,0.00069348986,0.0011583942,0.12695695,0.000284195,0.0008257337,0.0012214341,0.0022660873,0.31564894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027306238,0.0004686853,0.96196663,0.0051753344,0.0003574589,0.00026364054,0.026235862,0.00012236966,0.00015233684,0.00021086194,0.0049952995,0.000024122226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14063385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22914623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14063385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032271869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008226067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27963054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301512444","doi":"10.3138/9781442687769","title":"Court Government and the Collapse of Accountability in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; Government (linguistics); Accountability; Political science; Public administration; Law; Economic history; History; Philosophy; Geology","score_opus":0.031261204771347625,"score_gpt":0.2595726909206606,"score_spread":0.22831148614931296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301512444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07584516,0.061800834,0.00080845115,0.32063916,0.0023587141,0.000066824774,0.00047417666,0.0001098084,0.5378969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76481175,0.01472312,0.0004871442,0.024201827,0.00046239165,0.000036032965,0.00011370365,0.000111295994,0.19505273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98953956,0.0010823844,0.00019676994,0.0004590676,0.0030799129,0.005642287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916079,0.0021383448,0.00048055692,0.00024296812,0.003352733,0.002177513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032342349,0.0004298013,0.00078526547,0.0027707168,0.030541124,0.021303317,0.0022580782,0.010731086,0.008347785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01623955,0.0007169942,0.0005852113,0.0061231116,0.021821508,0.0037454383,0.0041059926,0.010293803,0.00053872017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054374712,0.000026332385,0.0026823785,0.000076548386,0.000022565036,0.0006945753,0.018831827,0.0012007327,0.00009608949,0.8001482,0.15118702,0.024979375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042674594,0.000021115344,0.020091657,0.0007147287,0.000054091946,0.00020139731,0.029793276,0.0011031163,0.00024535155,0.069893576,0.87766427,0.00017475354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99839836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2521084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2521084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3383223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8674483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301735661","doi":"10.47925/74.588","title":"Rights Talk, Redux","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Redux; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0625604236937493,"score_gpt":0.40839629477815714,"score_spread":0.34583587108440783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301735661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024728037,0.005614209,0.0009583233,0.2994377,0.06884122,0.000054063148,0.00047655762,0.00051489606,0.62163025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01114868,0.0012058789,0.00023939843,0.07478134,0.0063708886,0.000034970148,0.00015189717,0.00016253846,0.9059044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985808,0.00020704552,0.000044134023,0.00026051336,0.0005404684,0.00036702547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986338,0.0005208886,0.00003888221,0.00012715085,0.00028530147,0.00039380917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002165729,0.0004608301,0.00028563637,0.000652383,0.0061579538,0.00893632,0.00077109516,0.0068817893,0.12447597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053693126,0.00031216073,0.000506789,0.0003832907,0.0023373065,0.006353514,0.0040465803,0.011300374,0.033132765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015570933,0.00002005938,0.00011246731,0.000020107032,0.0000014366855,0.000085497,0.00027155838,0.000012191625,0.00011968373,0.04037231,0.94329125,0.015677791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033264994,0.000005226495,0.0001440518,0.000028077902,9.077117e-7,0.000031924297,0.00025947898,0.000010782824,0.00004791372,0.0015675831,0.99789774,0.0000030795088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007392216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017685995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12447597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022485906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023996546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4164136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302779838","doi":"","title":"A Procedure for Managing Conflict of Interest When Forming Thesis Juries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of interest; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.6183681944181981,"score_gpt":0.6496515445824889,"score_spread":0.031283350164290735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302779838","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010903001,0.00052285485,0.8430316,0.092511006,0.004904669,0.020459302,0.00020677004,0.0029133013,0.024547487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041212194,0.0004688517,0.9162123,0.015819868,0.0016499284,0.01620564,0.00007326699,0.00022046594,0.008137427],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7476364,0.17982118,0.02875435,0.0092871515,0.027845386,0.006655562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66742146,0.2205484,0.023291683,0.028274996,0.05297596,0.0074874787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2526216,0.0013425088,0.0016022796,0.0068794237,0.013418253,0.00874021,0.006722454,0.017614404,0.011509559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41848588,0.0021308893,0.0024423571,0.0023351882,0.010031214,0.010015433,0.008150067,0.021670979,0.010593709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063902873,0.0010293366,0.0039418675,0.0015091272,0.00016885191,0.0077126,0.051811486,0.002138142,0.01431845,0.19937244,0.27862474,0.43873385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001093307,0.0023800808,0.012609391,0.0065121395,0.00037876054,0.018889606,0.026138375,0.022923827,0.019793306,0.23821513,0.6493641,0.0017021127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014420493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054881917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7473784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032235906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024681343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92165065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303469978","doi":"","title":"The ethics of argumentation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.1558865965595398,"score_gpt":0.5145061695336608,"score_spread":0.358619572974121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303469978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021112047,0.02306143,0.10670492,0.12133111,0.0016712348,0.00012509577,0.00017586436,0.00017415646,0.7256441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9184396,0.0085456325,0.02306103,0.0054170727,0.0018953648,0.00034535927,0.0001391042,0.00013148223,0.04202547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714509,0.021126593,0.001249852,0.0016044347,0.003649972,0.0009181644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727399,0.019156793,0.0019720593,0.0025063097,0.0026414248,0.0009835276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013819474,0.0006042577,0.000606026,0.0019383323,0.0045968518,0.01360991,0.0012063823,0.00704323,0.006652182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023569942,0.0004536086,0.000575436,0.0016558077,0.028915912,0.008816508,0.0050208042,0.0054145087,0.001983688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069227585,0.0000047484455,0.00013243944,0.000049321123,0.000005377196,0.000035410616,0.0007316201,0.00026485327,0.000044216908,0.9921301,0.0018488714,0.004746225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008607362,0.000004851843,0.0001238785,0.00013105506,0.000003691003,0.000072997194,0.00030743578,0.0006767469,0.00007280184,0.9457944,0.052799013,0.0000045830297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011940371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009493007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013819474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053416416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07308525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307375661","doi":"10.26443/glsars.v2i1.249","title":"Those Who Teach Must Also Do: Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Legal Education and the Canadian Armed Forces","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill GLSA Research Series","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Context (archaeology); Engineering ethics; Legal education; Sociology; Adaptation (eye); Political science; Diversity (politics); Process (computing); Public relations; Engineering; Law; Social science; Computer science; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.11302607820655491,"score_gpt":0.4595577385391481,"score_spread":0.3465316603325932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307375661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26156318,0.012671824,0.0034936804,0.34472135,0.0009447598,0.00015885355,0.00019133923,0.00007947686,0.37617552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96389574,0.0034318594,0.0018618392,0.0076931682,0.00006590747,0.000042961106,0.000042418946,0.000027881068,0.022938194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882578,0.003101898,0.00018537273,0.00068801123,0.003957902,0.0038090774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991447,0.0018518398,0.00040292382,0.00023353247,0.0016479278,0.004416782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0095596025,0.00035248228,0.0004388194,0.0020631135,0.049431857,0.015897347,0.0024216026,0.003129879,0.0077890917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013930837,0.0003033691,0.0003470863,0.0032971231,0.038477138,0.004987085,0.012601563,0.0058768853,0.00033678918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035424433,0.00008381537,0.013192985,0.00022378087,0.000017983775,0.00052363635,0.38537797,0.00045234695,0.00046238006,0.42507464,0.035280928,0.1392742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013386698,0.00005002537,0.028530233,0.0009888607,0.00002684835,0.00022067619,0.47865292,0.0005023135,0.00039096992,0.036351837,0.4541357,0.00013618941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.829456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17054404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3437065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96205133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308150498","doi":"10.1017/cls.2022.22","title":"Dalia Gesualdi-Fecteau et Emmanuelle Bernheim, dir. La recherche empirique en droit : méthodes et pratiques. Montréal : Éditions Thémis, 2022, 336 pp.","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08353053914327485,"score_gpt":0.3760000190667353,"score_spread":0.29246947992346045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308150498","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044516163,0.8543789,0.0025858888,0.12683813,0.005184306,0.000019033972,0.0006059983,0.00010828143,0.009834308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023739092,0.87531704,0.00715384,0.02696927,0.004813699,0.0001855764,0.0009058022,0.0005230513,0.060392648],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957118,0.0015730665,0.00028836116,0.00046823535,0.001636615,0.00032202806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99254566,0.004269502,0.0005490431,0.00027670382,0.0020643803,0.00029478545],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00571128,0.0019323482,0.0013401341,0.0045593935,0.0032966984,0.0063005867,0.0022744874,0.0044512185,0.019520968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017300524,0.0016768283,0.0008402983,0.0065631205,0.004888998,0.012023324,0.0029924235,0.0062953373,0.009332946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005506112,0.0000151453605,0.0006140035,0.00078104454,0.000032251333,0.00009697834,0.003098221,0.0001238404,0.000114476534,0.028230324,0.8889608,0.07787796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012089145,0.0000060797197,0.001960987,0.0009223784,0.000015222589,0.00013068471,0.0013812033,0.0001018059,0.00019134756,0.012292193,0.9829556,0.000030426676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23804119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32114634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99428874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009255372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010606201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4733113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312390596","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17185-7_1","title":"Coming to Care Ethics in Higher Education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Narrative; Scope (computer science); Subject (documents); Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Sociology; Library science; Engineering; Literature; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.22170390628559497,"score_gpt":0.46212841053998605,"score_spread":0.24042450425439107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312390596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00089667307,0.009220142,0.0026092648,0.021987377,0.0015833079,0.000033896773,0.000015576456,0.000024251096,0.9636294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033818174,0.0048538246,0.0021589873,0.012008195,0.00095234055,0.00007873566,0.000028277016,0.00007587998,0.94602555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843174,0.00074321596,0.000036841033,0.00009170935,0.00051461527,0.00018175949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887913,0.00069352996,0.000034519544,0.00005536424,0.00016985006,0.00016760969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017306069,0.000576201,0.00035792188,0.0008514188,0.005755254,0.008561459,0.0008072628,0.006304532,0.02223216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024829921,0.0002979954,0.00025849394,0.0010128374,0.010229896,0.005309092,0.0026294882,0.010354994,0.005493764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012940053,0.000021602513,0.000027999913,0.000027972796,5.45506e-7,0.000034345652,0.0019550698,0.00006910404,0.000028122453,0.8977251,0.08577413,0.014334678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027141555,0.00000672015,0.000136612,0.00025256563,0.0000011034969,0.000097013406,0.0016150231,0.0001666523,0.00008054929,0.34775868,0.649876,0.0000063784328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0088485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029011676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02223216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072987033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007978905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07437396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313366648","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-16922-9_3","title":"Using Codes of Professional Ethics and Conduct in Teacher Education: Pitfalls and Best Practice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Professional ethics; Ethical code; Engineering ethics; Morality; Professional conduct; Professional development; Pedagogy; Globe; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.2853760045911453,"score_gpt":0.522541369374616,"score_spread":0.23716536478347072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313366648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067693177,0.055204336,0.10423442,0.38038093,0.0067519774,0.00014448944,0.00007402475,0.00024322968,0.44619724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.502005,0.03762657,0.17014444,0.063391,0.0043090805,0.0009468588,0.00012725487,0.0012077676,0.22024201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9550756,0.034292977,0.0011831205,0.0010081755,0.007387508,0.0010525209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9057611,0.08021352,0.0013533427,0.0044200895,0.006678962,0.001572987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03580455,0.00075648684,0.001043067,0.0024720682,0.00907207,0.02089881,0.0026670585,0.009710054,0.004143972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04864613,0.0008888333,0.00040974809,0.003135074,0.079246186,0.019067641,0.006570017,0.023720391,0.0017917405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020462714,0.000007814435,0.000055674718,0.00005556147,0.0000011979963,0.000018586976,0.010231988,0.00007821343,0.000014242813,0.9517355,0.020149967,0.017649189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004708858,0.000007893889,0.00013239731,0.0008967374,0.000002345271,0.00011384781,0.007846593,0.00040237146,0.00012425365,0.78460556,0.20584404,0.000019279343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016172823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034541577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03580455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01033693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026761843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18935484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313529024","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2022.70","title":"The Rise of Women Lawyers in India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.08264378286202186,"score_gpt":0.4298698225698078,"score_spread":0.347226039707786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313529024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7340281,0.0061027026,0.00024907064,0.1709874,0.0008866281,0.00008186971,0.0003808225,0.00009308906,0.0871902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96456915,0.0018243395,0.00008783162,0.012667635,0.0002003364,0.000031270858,0.000053160562,0.000023435718,0.020542825],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943843,0.00080239284,0.0000948819,0.00044049174,0.0007580551,0.003519927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99041337,0.002568979,0.0014778753,0.00022335871,0.00096303376,0.004353345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016152513,0.00017654606,0.00036024285,0.0020341314,0.013728369,0.008467145,0.001761764,0.0031700071,0.023222394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006733732,0.00060158275,0.0002431102,0.0038954886,0.007661774,0.0027435918,0.0072556403,0.006049704,0.0014525177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003313219,0.00025772376,0.15418854,0.00076796947,0.000046899724,0.008694789,0.48886377,0.00013913926,0.002621787,0.12850595,0.11991278,0.09566937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003059974,0.00012372289,0.17616247,0.0005577109,0.000025077263,0.0015125682,0.46700352,0.000106835265,0.0004191519,0.0031291144,0.35085532,0.00007390847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12547001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23522186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12547001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017562686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021462904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24947941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317038159","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7780","title":"People With Disabilities Need Lawyers Too! A Ready-To-Use Plan for Law Schools to Educate Law Students to Effectively Serve the Legal Needs of Clients With Disabilities as Well as Clients Without Disabilities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Legal education; Inclusion (mineral); Curriculum; Diversity (politics); Law; Legal profession; Action plan; Legal research; Plan (archaeology); Education Act; Political science; Special education; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.05319086489561085,"score_gpt":0.3855859909408429,"score_spread":0.332395126045232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317038159","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040896535,0.010155348,0.0026598347,0.79092884,0.0063288026,0.00015850429,0.00019373975,0.00036268847,0.18512255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054152355,0.027051799,0.012593615,0.29535574,0.0024934546,0.00028644453,0.0004951555,0.0002500986,0.6073214],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997889,0.00039980715,0.00006968553,0.00014577314,0.00077937834,0.00071636913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966905,0.00056055543,0.00018415804,0.00011899506,0.00058319326,0.0018626434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016113949,0.00048935355,0.000393188,0.000809157,0.008755654,0.006882389,0.00096932385,0.0076235333,0.049755186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004309107,0.0004732691,0.0004153734,0.0008304746,0.0055770073,0.013289823,0.008068832,0.009269533,0.013355858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006412735,0.00012374429,0.0010742076,0.00018457144,0.0000031036648,0.00021416605,0.004528779,0.00003518525,0.00029132608,0.056940738,0.8246506,0.11194724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069162024,0.000019212002,0.0011794509,0.0002358642,0.0000030001167,0.00019673916,0.0070561585,0.000014378562,0.00005794749,0.006586142,0.9846341,0.000010151569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07628963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24663733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07628963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053126966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027930833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1664477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317884482","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.29","title":"Theorizing Access to Civil Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European University Institute","keywords":"Economic Justice; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Underpinning; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; State (computer science); Law; Frame (networking); Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.1130655748367023,"score_gpt":0.44688745876339186,"score_spread":0.33382188392668954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317884482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039594073,0.003011723,0.050501116,0.06770817,0.00028504618,0.00008864423,0.00011559106,0.000047170997,0.83864844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819374,0.0009990422,0.0026739961,0.0025612225,0.00019066762,0.000086702275,0.00004166373,0.000030001993,0.011479238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99208635,0.0038815546,0.00019971243,0.0009470683,0.0017079515,0.0011772863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925073,0.004617104,0.00047037113,0.0008128904,0.000941827,0.0006504866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007882779,0.00041259296,0.0004879466,0.0028820168,0.0058802213,0.009130722,0.0023399075,0.005108887,0.012727951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014440467,0.00027087968,0.0006177824,0.0023144798,0.06886231,0.01267197,0.012378735,0.005303756,0.00061312324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.772117e-7,0.000002550798,0.00005395322,0.000005312194,8.6778255e-7,0.000013571115,0.0007202381,0.000080096506,0.0000073462315,0.99857855,0.00022179459,0.00031499536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004649941,0.0000031990805,0.00010514164,0.000061346014,0.0000032082646,0.000023451168,0.0013253815,0.00038029897,0.000030427529,0.98714197,0.010917946,0.0000030605213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02000661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0107488595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02000661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011978467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008313644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08691025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318714330","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4322778","title":"Ethical Issues for Judges Attending and Presenting at Conferences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.07415968418500964,"score_gpt":0.4437997087657303,"score_spread":0.3696400245807207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318714330","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024938747,0.0027057861,0.011518865,0.86343807,0.020547574,0.0016612239,0.00015023179,0.0001297898,0.074909694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38426465,0.0019080585,0.032373883,0.46922916,0.019631773,0.006695607,0.00021150951,0.00038109327,0.08530426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6568846,0.23401016,0.027900942,0.01032014,0.045422707,0.025461463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45855516,0.35210878,0.018374445,0.04376731,0.08202459,0.045169782],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23743019,0.0008090582,0.0019326895,0.002950818,0.026195124,0.025235895,0.008436448,0.06348611,0.010671433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5364252,0.002713909,0.0018680779,0.0026897604,0.024157435,0.009996129,0.009831643,0.06104525,0.005759621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047764397,0.00077215006,0.0064651575,0.0005047702,0.0001638674,0.002597518,0.09017878,0.00053039065,0.002135658,0.42664453,0.4112105,0.058318973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005232185,0.00030476134,0.005378983,0.0032369115,0.0001671562,0.003618242,0.07539935,0.0026191657,0.0020116265,0.25816888,0.6482108,0.00036091762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007986755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023503799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23743019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007022587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06138307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9403843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318714501","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4322758","title":"Judicial Confidentiality in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Confidentiality; Duty; Law; Privilege (computing); Obligation; Judicial opinion; Public interest","score_opus":0.02297881705149732,"score_gpt":0.3463328719774011,"score_spread":0.32335405492590374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318714501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2638461,0.014609882,0.0010485244,0.3311116,0.0023030727,0.0003376151,0.002385619,0.00012878873,0.38422883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7738651,0.0052099917,0.0009682934,0.059910834,0.00037913237,0.00012423989,0.00036422993,0.00010658955,0.15907164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819865,0.0014365395,0.00061098847,0.001490966,0.0044658375,0.0100091845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650496,0.007414662,0.0016243106,0.0008778776,0.012306453,0.012727112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069268793,0.0004325195,0.0012644026,0.0032756578,0.04216368,0.015757915,0.004127885,0.0132332975,0.024136381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032857634,0.0013564109,0.001197818,0.005243431,0.0065605347,0.0029388836,0.005888793,0.015923748,0.0010468634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022941534,0.0002544664,0.048581842,0.0004104957,0.00016051452,0.0027191418,0.023671053,0.0018394695,0.0005316117,0.57619274,0.29334444,0.05206481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025964293,0.00011338741,0.12647088,0.0014171326,0.00025079778,0.0008044762,0.036505952,0.0021931382,0.0008210804,0.02555087,0.8052359,0.00037671527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99699163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2403438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2403438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5156483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8810935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318716465","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4328616","title":"Omniscient Narrative Modes in Law: From Trial Strategy to the Fellow-Servant Rule","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Narrative; Servant; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05117670826859536,"score_gpt":0.3921561226601826,"score_spread":0.34097941439158724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318716465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1067158,0.0012846021,0.08242777,0.038654223,0.00026371662,0.00012985534,0.00008044192,0.0001163746,0.77032715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795873,0.00020811503,0.004485005,0.0009792976,0.000081384605,0.000081967235,0.000016120463,0.00006750522,0.01449328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919269,0.00564037,0.00023040277,0.0007439794,0.0008513172,0.00060716015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984593,0.010884546,0.0009787765,0.0016598976,0.0010654991,0.00081828295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012358086,0.0004195433,0.00055084913,0.0014578911,0.005784962,0.014492863,0.0024297405,0.006052672,0.012058368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035219844,0.00048760118,0.0004206542,0.0010151544,0.033647623,0.015840365,0.0053916536,0.0058095236,0.0013931394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008764788,0.000007862379,0.00015203621,0.00000708522,0.0000014400114,0.000038777383,0.0058641965,0.00005301064,0.000024866375,0.9903854,0.00085111154,0.0026053924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019399791,0.000012341646,0.00018737096,0.000057986104,0.0000053543317,0.000081733204,0.0058191665,0.0008420399,0.00015638521,0.9798535,0.012955367,0.000009353263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043327403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004257281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014492863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003413321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064364313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06535655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318977566","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4345983","title":"Rankings without U.S. News: A Revealed Preference Approach to Evaluating Law Schools","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Law; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10842790241691798,"score_gpt":0.4150757585761705,"score_spread":0.30664785615925255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318977566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6310962,0.0022374832,0.31074107,0.004047193,0.00028142103,0.00211246,0.009178817,0.00052599644,0.039779313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92945546,0.00038375863,0.06554622,0.0002280755,0.00013447102,0.0003951737,0.0015598437,0.00006204043,0.0022348918],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.94887894,0.041210487,0.0019275298,0.0023940136,0.004460537,0.0011284502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8639216,0.11724245,0.005712106,0.005301859,0.0060357326,0.0017862559],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02569912,0.0011831659,0.002676574,0.0092646945,0.001749016,0.0077025583,0.0021817654,0.0018995752,0.008572277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11294668,0.0007382864,0.0018904886,0.013259937,0.0014453,0.0055679153,0.001971783,0.002611213,0.0010542942],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010397046,0.003303002,0.1652378,0.0024052034,0.005679456,0.001091627,0.0027441878,0.18206483,0.0021010423,0.15219925,0.027842337,0.4449341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067639374,0.0027235558,0.033624697,0.00022015427,0.0012466998,0.00026010987,0.0039100647,0.80509394,0.0015713718,0.14284937,0.007456631,0.00036700474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020663505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042148605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97430086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046463734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038089624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13591158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319877134","doi":"10.29242/lawstats.2021","title":"ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 2021","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ARL academic law and medical library statistics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Library science; Academic library; Law; Political science; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03355264656939061,"score_gpt":0.3517682123872268,"score_spread":0.31821556581783617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319877134","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000744411,0.0028075299,0.0019128133,0.0052579623,0.0019147964,0.00019747816,0.6827893,0.004794397,0.29958132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004714837,0.0049810903,0.003961947,0.002806526,0.0013297044,0.00048419315,0.5394675,0.0022262852,0.4400279],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99576205,0.0003027647,0.00026494937,0.00021540417,0.0031718502,0.00028296848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982967,0.0033045101,0.0012785353,0.0009679604,0.010716808,0.00076517736],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022166176,0.0010894523,0.00072712684,0.0088965045,0.0012737177,0.0047798585,0.0011105621,0.00089091365,0.12493331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018573888,0.00075372984,0.00048481606,0.022604104,0.00037852582,0.0023120136,0.0010317646,0.0021756266,0.21798539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034232287,0.000002963185,0.00013745583,0.000021844706,7.59114e-7,0.0000021853364,0.0000064280002,0.000034992037,0.000006037603,0.0006265141,0.9906922,0.008465119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038609205,0.0000037451348,0.0023377715,0.000097537275,0.0000016154406,0.000014023504,0.000023667204,0.00010946099,0.000040143525,0.00049909804,0.99686015,0.00000901115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19450362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21114306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058735046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016836664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41794354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320019173","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2022.05.83","title":"Access to legal education in the countries with the common system of law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal education; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.07788190432214644,"score_gpt":0.4393589149882009,"score_spread":0.3614770106660545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320019173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67702955,0.005481743,0.001006276,0.019663477,0.00020428673,0.00009344137,0.00060000847,0.00003238268,0.29588884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883094,0.0011553955,0.00035397944,0.0020555677,0.000051471172,0.000020261108,0.000141146,0.0000035014114,0.007909249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979425,0.0004672148,0.00010392348,0.0002253866,0.0003058836,0.00095506944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656564,0.0007525904,0.0009589348,0.00020682327,0.00037221974,0.0011437741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009752436,0.000083251485,0.00020444159,0.0012805283,0.00240043,0.0032886143,0.00040794726,0.0010192211,0.018500913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037715328,0.00011011005,0.00020279216,0.0012492554,0.0024222776,0.002326633,0.0032689823,0.001308701,0.00048794015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010535434,0.00050605973,0.2041989,0.000527474,0.000038676055,0.0033727973,0.026456377,0.000443445,0.0009302703,0.59004223,0.016141497,0.15723683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054103373,0.0002003136,0.5470591,0.0017388824,0.00003329438,0.0028576378,0.051625546,0.0003852502,0.000522493,0.050347,0.3451073,0.000069133304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017728766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03396803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018500913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019151935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061478037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061891735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320401297","doi":"10.47925/2008.190","title":"No Remedy for Cultural Conflict: The Inability of Discourse Ethics to Resolve Substantive Moral Disagreement","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2970231759252047,"score_gpt":0.49549280400935325,"score_spread":0.19846962808414853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320401297","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03910404,0.0030600107,0.10892768,0.5781374,0.002438302,0.000114995404,0.00008449395,0.00019332964,0.2679399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94215566,0.0006529616,0.018781457,0.029048586,0.0011333782,0.00024388013,0.000027247395,0.00021168237,0.007745106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92898816,0.05292282,0.0019391505,0.0048547005,0.008248714,0.0030464425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.879444,0.08191215,0.007151042,0.018768309,0.008754949,0.0039696293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.069714725,0.0006711138,0.0017762826,0.0026370112,0.012942438,0.013971087,0.005666965,0.020599602,0.009530689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16815343,0.0012776885,0.0011003593,0.0015834083,0.09439396,0.031662226,0.01295228,0.02498377,0.0014010004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015427566,0.000014622191,0.00012817784,0.000034050896,0.000015870755,0.000050056773,0.0044267606,0.00016411388,0.000062921084,0.98696005,0.0039850175,0.0041429284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030368328,0.000006376965,0.00006149238,0.00007717044,0.0000074097647,0.000043547734,0.0016156734,0.0003945847,0.00012811017,0.98801404,0.009606922,0.000014262237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028014905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002843932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069714725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006084745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013241381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3686911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320514242","doi":"10.17118/11143/19147","title":"Reconsidering “community”: a normative model to address communities in the law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1048449195094748,"score_gpt":0.3137400614515826,"score_spread":0.20889514194210781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320514242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049190115,0.0011632273,0.15600921,0.25881547,0.0009821064,0.00018249077,0.00007534338,0.00013602532,0.533446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96597344,0.00019765175,0.0116527015,0.0083210105,0.00027867706,0.00018960207,0.00001920982,0.00008162908,0.013286149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706861,0.019785624,0.000748392,0.0024562324,0.003711325,0.0026123438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97341377,0.013986563,0.0012673285,0.0034502987,0.0046404367,0.0032416484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028687466,0.0008419172,0.001168473,0.0026320182,0.019058779,0.017565984,0.0048496467,0.018370954,0.008365955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03400656,0.00052575447,0.0010489174,0.001805333,0.097320884,0.025073249,0.015104693,0.0138236,0.0008584625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002006713,0.000004840153,0.00004441263,0.000003500971,8.4605784e-7,0.000010500415,0.0015066662,0.00007167073,0.00001120983,0.99737453,0.0004377765,0.00053208845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012946854,0.0000073560864,0.000055954122,0.00003400304,0.0000034826217,0.000029330853,0.0026160723,0.00063631794,0.00006481983,0.9818075,0.01472294,0.00000923846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01944865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025647528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028687466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014610341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02334331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15171564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321152057","doi":"","title":"The junior referee conundrum: how do you gain experience with the peer review process?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Peer review; Psychology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.4766950567825052,"score_gpt":0.6144748890156891,"score_spread":0.13777983223318396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321152057","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002526429,0.003220561,0.005401489,0.8829318,0.0801035,0.00036371575,0.00009162074,0.0008533434,0.02450755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08026883,0.0075691263,0.017544007,0.6982263,0.09978079,0.0017462481,0.00033155998,0.0017153395,0.09281786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82954156,0.07659112,0.022516053,0.007064331,0.057034403,0.007252574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.41735402,0.12510273,0.03654516,0.04720863,0.2873981,0.08639139],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1499796,0.000817067,0.0021005454,0.0025950267,0.012464013,0.01746003,0.0049229776,0.023531623,0.04162475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5964103,0.0009265075,0.0018656185,0.0018869728,0.006778728,0.014690466,0.007892261,0.017526226,0.034351412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011186675,0.0000769647,0.0016497034,0.0004997418,0.000042942105,0.0008348558,0.0023477548,0.00003128926,0.00046966822,0.0026330454,0.92123324,0.07006904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013685056,0.00017779975,0.0055884817,0.0023609325,0.0000795062,0.005369313,0.0076431464,0.0005316464,0.00064423337,0.012816113,0.96439713,0.00025484822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00458063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012493163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8500204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006047129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027405404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7931775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322749763","doi":"10.1007/978-981-19-8696-3_4","title":"The Tree of Legal Knowledge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Tree (set theory); Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.10035326254636422,"score_gpt":0.4054556124806165,"score_spread":0.3051023499342523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322749763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011127661,0.0035231642,0.00949367,0.0077007054,0.00020177117,0.000017613223,0.00006817305,0.000039777962,0.97784245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22518007,0.0102210585,0.018703302,0.0049479106,0.0007366822,0.00017421195,0.00033753208,0.00031935875,0.7393799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916136,0.00038353374,0.000016620574,0.0001118602,0.00024117233,0.00008539589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881953,0.0007056093,0.000048108966,0.00014946055,0.00017529022,0.00010202127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000954794,0.00045802747,0.00042399348,0.0020064702,0.0037375502,0.008175949,0.001008576,0.002481055,0.02829296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002909615,0.0003713888,0.00026440644,0.0022312838,0.014074918,0.010668292,0.0023806365,0.0047905315,0.0052707978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013157443,0.0000027699023,0.000015835973,0.000007719626,4.5720236e-7,0.000008855634,0.00044023755,0.00006524523,0.000012385554,0.98877305,0.0059686275,0.004703612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000209228,0.0000027143155,0.000058728467,0.00006946703,9.998198e-7,0.000029588879,0.00042591657,0.00035434403,0.000038068207,0.81453335,0.18448135,0.0000032948537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009126551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014068884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02829296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050476864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036670608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094649374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323038566","doi":"10.32920/22212052","title":"Telling Tales About Law School: Reflections on Care, Holism, and Marginality in Law Teaching","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Narrative; Conversation; Context (archaeology); Holism; Legal education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Holistic education; Psychology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20111856943885573,"score_gpt":0.4953384556689872,"score_spread":0.2942198862301315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323038566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8951615,0.0026447573,0.005878965,0.054015834,0.000621329,0.00012336191,0.000095990734,0.00009503459,0.04136308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909657,0.00065607944,0.00051495526,0.0026645774,0.00006617825,0.000031426916,0.000014152609,0.00006843967,0.005018541],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97886664,0.015032578,0.0003212467,0.0009198077,0.0017916558,0.0030680352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746635,0.018727457,0.0011456232,0.0005541576,0.0013983267,0.0035109753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015045533,0.00088589516,0.0010663428,0.0019805715,0.052992433,0.014372246,0.003648042,0.0056569707,0.003616065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03029901,0.00083274255,0.0006222267,0.0018688766,0.07860335,0.010222675,0.012513576,0.01700234,0.00041902368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053597264,0.000008064754,0.00022633062,0.000013414859,0.0000010810987,0.00030315891,0.99471456,0.000014687129,0.00011879834,0.0034139822,0.0004928776,0.0006876721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012547076,0.000008006106,0.00021581154,0.000038316415,0.0000017999994,0.00011962119,0.9879764,0.000030787316,0.00012736257,0.00085764035,0.010615432,0.0000076569495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1324714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18444917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1324714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025347728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016719075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2634006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323038568","doi":"10.32920/22212052.v1","title":"Telling Tales About Law School: Reflections on Care, Holism, and Marginality in Law Teaching","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Narrative; Conversation; Context (archaeology); Holism; Legal education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Holistic education; Law; Epistemology; Political science; History; Art","score_opus":0.20111856943885573,"score_gpt":0.4953384556689872,"score_spread":0.2942198862301315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323038568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8951615,0.0026447573,0.005878965,0.054015834,0.000621329,0.00012336191,0.000095990734,0.00009503459,0.04136308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909657,0.00065607944,0.00051495526,0.0026645774,0.00006617825,0.000031426916,0.000014152609,0.00006843967,0.005018541],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97886664,0.015032578,0.0003212467,0.0009198077,0.0017916558,0.0030680352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746635,0.018727457,0.0011456232,0.0005541576,0.0013983267,0.0035109753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015045533,0.00088589516,0.0010663428,0.0019805715,0.052992433,0.014372246,0.003648042,0.0056569707,0.003616065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03029901,0.00083274255,0.0006222267,0.0018688766,0.07860335,0.010222675,0.012513576,0.01700234,0.00041902368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053597264,0.000008064754,0.00022633062,0.000013414859,0.0000010810987,0.00030315891,0.99471456,0.000014687129,0.00011879834,0.0034139822,0.0004928776,0.0006876721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012547076,0.000008006106,0.00021581154,0.000038316415,0.0000017999994,0.00011962119,0.9879764,0.000030787316,0.00012736257,0.00085764035,0.010615432,0.0000076569495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1324714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18444917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1324714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025347728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016719075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2634006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323286950","doi":"10.23977/aetp.2023.070108","title":"The Dilemma of Vice Chancellors of Law and Its Improvement—Based on the Analysis of Court Personnel","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Southwest Minzu University","keywords":"Law; Enthusiasm; Dilemma; Political science; Medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.03201949962098506,"score_gpt":0.421533128389899,"score_spread":0.38951362876891393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323286950","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15174958,0.011502074,0.04186645,0.41355282,0.004657405,0.00025706287,0.00017517689,0.00008994604,0.37614948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529747,0.002514212,0.006114601,0.0101611065,0.0014858955,0.000088895205,0.000049366776,0.000047508678,0.026563706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98361593,0.007886126,0.0006667433,0.0022932158,0.0037467831,0.0017912188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860654,0.0036490508,0.0016621865,0.0012183419,0.004745712,0.002659411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016794788,0.00046083977,0.00043306657,0.0034072208,0.008362328,0.010522501,0.0016124946,0.0025030642,0.0056590443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027287548,0.0003146983,0.00051663874,0.0018332868,0.01906478,0.009740086,0.0044791535,0.005415415,0.00094475417],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030322648,0.000048880083,0.012241472,0.0001024959,0.000019206465,0.00019898571,0.011827245,0.00016129913,0.00017198178,0.87757576,0.034099597,0.063522846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032317126,0.00015636165,0.04129043,0.00094012066,0.00006526689,0.0013287179,0.05432433,0.0025682615,0.0008137482,0.4546099,0.4437458,0.0001248912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013427408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012133685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016794788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059263934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011748979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0888204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323350815","doi":"10.32920/22229503","title":"Some Reflections of a Métis Law Student and Assistant Professor on Indigenous Legal Education in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenization; Indigenous; Law; Sociology; Racism; Decolonization; Political science; Legal education; Colonialism; Subject (documents); Library science; Anthropology; Politics","score_opus":0.0729173356117904,"score_gpt":0.45615788326439116,"score_spread":0.38324054765260074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323350815","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2888352,0.00825634,0.00097191235,0.61861324,0.0049821674,0.00024182755,0.00021768485,0.000101424725,0.07778025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78809756,0.006314419,0.0011238502,0.07971136,0.0008427475,0.00013278986,0.00008278305,0.00016022405,0.12353428],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821147,0.005169283,0.0002694688,0.0011469699,0.0043358183,0.0069636838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752083,0.0023532254,0.0006036403,0.0001679826,0.005178,0.016488953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006453337,0.0006282488,0.00086801784,0.0015119517,0.10561588,0.013891519,0.00447144,0.007580071,0.005970358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011446589,0.000772811,0.0006590764,0.0031741823,0.024577739,0.0037379211,0.009424089,0.02276664,0.00069938414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029118604,0.0001467842,0.0036465768,0.00009468618,0.000010246733,0.0021816723,0.88279456,0.00012470428,0.0007506869,0.010928818,0.08802517,0.011267066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004587534,0.000035052275,0.0017943452,0.00009890479,0.000004690367,0.00022904,0.80516475,0.00007012978,0.00014960964,0.00031737762,0.19209115,0.000040367548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9488993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97902817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87748235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12251764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18566757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8889319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323350902","doi":"10.32920/22229503.v1","title":"Some Reflections of a Métis Law Student and Assistant Professor on Indigenous Legal Education in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenization; Indigenous; Law; Sociology; Racism; Decolonization; Legal education; Political science; Colonialism; Subject (documents); Library science; Anthropology; Politics","score_opus":0.0729173356117904,"score_gpt":0.45615788326439116,"score_spread":0.38324054765260074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323350902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2888352,0.00825634,0.00097191235,0.61861324,0.0049821674,0.00024182755,0.00021768485,0.000101424725,0.07778025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78809756,0.006314419,0.0011238502,0.07971136,0.0008427475,0.00013278986,0.00008278305,0.00016022405,0.12353428],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821147,0.005169283,0.0002694688,0.0011469699,0.0043358183,0.0069636838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752083,0.0023532254,0.0006036403,0.0001679826,0.005178,0.016488953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006453337,0.0006282488,0.00086801784,0.0015119517,0.10561588,0.013891519,0.00447144,0.007580071,0.005970358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011446589,0.000772811,0.0006590764,0.0031741823,0.024577739,0.0037379211,0.009424089,0.02276664,0.00069938414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029118604,0.0001467842,0.0036465768,0.00009468618,0.000010246733,0.0021816723,0.88279456,0.00012470428,0.0007506869,0.010928818,0.08802517,0.011267066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004587534,0.000035052275,0.0017943452,0.00009890479,0.000004690367,0.00022904,0.80516475,0.00007012978,0.00014960964,0.00031737762,0.19209115,0.000040367548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9488993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97902817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87748235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12251764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18566757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8889319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323352380","doi":"10.32920/22229332.v1","title":"More lawyers, more litigation? Exploring trends in litigation and the legal profession in Ontario, Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Civil litigation; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.11502316609871688,"score_gpt":0.383537077166203,"score_spread":0.2685139110674861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323352380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95499814,0.0034771853,0.00028769078,0.017942118,0.000068407535,0.00007830415,0.0051224013,0.000021613261,0.018004106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98837507,0.0022543306,0.00032351178,0.00066415453,0.000030654654,0.000020122303,0.00094317057,0.000012025354,0.007376905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977913,0.00012637729,0.00012416004,0.00022279606,0.00090029294,0.0008350587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98776567,0.0014652337,0.0028782524,0.0001660097,0.0045631253,0.0031617358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015290485,0.00015315645,0.0003241066,0.0038340604,0.0053544436,0.003805002,0.0014882429,0.00069548195,0.0055283653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007581082,0.00032649678,0.0003059157,0.009140632,0.0023603083,0.0015404057,0.0013141118,0.001186692,0.0002799071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010238905,0.00007885031,0.9101914,0.00023523835,0.00004466345,0.0003378531,0.032937855,0.00036274237,0.00064545823,0.0048125084,0.012458252,0.037792765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007439284,0.00001927654,0.94597507,0.00012347748,0.00001688831,0.000049532908,0.036769122,0.000360351,0.0001292383,0.00023438483,0.01629617,0.00001900565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99826044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111390635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111390635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15313807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8081994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323352533","doi":"10.32920/22229332","title":"More lawyers, more litigation? Exploring trends in litigation and the legal profession in Ontario, Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil litigation; Argument (complex analysis); Legal profession; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.11502316609871688,"score_gpt":0.383537077166203,"score_spread":0.2685139110674861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323352533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95499814,0.0034771853,0.00028769078,0.017942118,0.000068407535,0.00007830415,0.0051224013,0.000021613261,0.018004106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98837507,0.0022543306,0.00032351178,0.00066415453,0.000030654654,0.000020122303,0.00094317057,0.000012025354,0.007376905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977913,0.00012637729,0.00012416004,0.00022279606,0.00090029294,0.0008350587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98776567,0.0014652337,0.0028782524,0.0001660097,0.0045631253,0.0031617358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015290485,0.00015315645,0.0003241066,0.0038340604,0.0053544436,0.003805002,0.0014882429,0.00069548195,0.0055283653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007581082,0.00032649678,0.0003059157,0.009140632,0.0023603083,0.0015404057,0.0013141118,0.001186692,0.0002799071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010238905,0.00007885031,0.9101914,0.00023523835,0.00004466345,0.0003378531,0.032937855,0.00036274237,0.00064545823,0.0048125084,0.012458252,0.037792765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007439284,0.00001927654,0.94597507,0.00012347748,0.00001688831,0.000049532908,0.036769122,0.000360351,0.0001292383,0.00023438483,0.01629617,0.00001900565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99826044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111390635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111390635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15313807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8081994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323572194","doi":"10.32920/22227781.v1","title":"Barriers to the Profession: Inaction in Ontario, Canada and its Consequences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Legal profession; Medical profession; Limiting; Perception; White (mutation); Political science; White paper; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Medicine; Psychology; Medical education; Engineering","score_opus":0.09219894863678113,"score_gpt":0.3919780751482516,"score_spread":0.2997791265114705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323572194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9038778,0.0039399127,0.00023289434,0.055779193,0.00032336952,0.00019473271,0.0022061446,0.00005304003,0.033392884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97900134,0.002367315,0.00016801087,0.0027330443,0.00004983296,0.00004979681,0.00053671317,0.00003297256,0.015061024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99176735,0.00046866375,0.00024327687,0.00044615119,0.003114085,0.0039604744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973929,0.0013078109,0.00376896,0.0005008517,0.007776847,0.012716559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028970963,0.00040998563,0.00062557025,0.0026287993,0.022634916,0.0052838847,0.0038526796,0.002081857,0.010431728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009686624,0.0006788595,0.0007951834,0.0061213365,0.0064734677,0.0022628985,0.005509201,0.0041320035,0.0005576557],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041364756,0.000562108,0.68311024,0.000674271,0.000088114415,0.0016624655,0.14373305,0.0005247644,0.00084239687,0.019376352,0.06902064,0.079992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003593496,0.000057400855,0.8165703,0.00072971714,0.000033010165,0.0001517816,0.12594807,0.00045184206,0.000152241,0.0009036565,0.054892126,0.000073837546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99858475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99922967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81061876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18938123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28977966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9402029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323657510","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2023.27035","title":"How Engaged in Legal Planning for Incapacity and Death Are Canadians? A Mixed-Methods Survey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Queen's University; Lethbridge College; University of Lethbridge; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.26832127291172087,"score_gpt":0.5362373010617011,"score_spread":0.2679160281499802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323657510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99014026,0.00061404606,0.00015551707,0.0017496097,0.000022016282,0.0003323944,0.002782579,0.00000772467,0.0041957046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99366534,0.0012660738,0.00056942226,0.0014837462,0.000018301003,0.0002718586,0.0012727407,0.0000065717068,0.0014459604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964792,0.00057018566,0.00025361334,0.000332857,0.001361563,0.0010025715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927994,0.00090417685,0.0014201911,0.00016800503,0.003195385,0.0015128906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045875646,0.0003183065,0.0005517927,0.002762162,0.0071493457,0.0025724093,0.0013675777,0.0010275078,0.003166107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010524875,0.0005999085,0.00065175066,0.005173095,0.0015808654,0.0011966025,0.0015398476,0.0013120177,0.00035107145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098019664,0.00025123227,0.9115256,0.00036966702,0.000081167826,0.00019104288,0.06262113,0.000052421685,0.00021059417,0.00031704325,0.0041273683,0.020154795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002336929,0.00017622401,0.87590367,0.0003657645,0.000046364046,0.00012202514,0.1149484,0.00018419643,0.00010244638,0.000080191676,0.007994649,0.00005281575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9837106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023684366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023684366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039597917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17184293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327747197","doi":"10.32920/22229509.v1","title":"Towards Implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action in Law Schools: A Settler Harm Reduction Approach to Racial Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Indigenous Peoples and Indigenous Legal Orders in Canadian Legal Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canadian Bar Association; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Indigenous; Prejudice (legal term); Political science; Harm; Law; Commission; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07295356932481475,"score_gpt":0.3892679816070466,"score_spread":0.3163144122822319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327747197","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10601342,0.0019219861,0.012476034,0.7501516,0.0013768381,0.00097374676,0.000054657226,0.0002459546,0.12678581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8453887,0.001607786,0.031797975,0.07831242,0.00028240823,0.00046586315,0.00006639633,0.000096846474,0.041981675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9690291,0.010719271,0.0006616587,0.0015951649,0.008521589,0.009473197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686291,0.007239246,0.0022148911,0.0009168543,0.008901045,0.012098819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036195602,0.0006280225,0.0005576619,0.0034367612,0.05654927,0.019708522,0.004494169,0.010894381,0.0049524014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035444736,0.000658127,0.0010008891,0.0018672042,0.035083856,0.0065377844,0.012571026,0.015871095,0.00047610296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051117335,0.00083672156,0.019110033,0.00050862477,0.000053333268,0.0007652979,0.31835258,0.0014500369,0.0024834913,0.3646787,0.11778173,0.1739283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119903154,0.00024021065,0.06678592,0.0012277743,0.00013448445,0.00019224091,0.3750933,0.0026606868,0.002863738,0.08665644,0.46365872,0.0003666843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9395459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9691319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14276204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14276204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5003346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99427456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361002872","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2023.2172884","title":"Not Logic, but Experience: Teaching Canadian Human Rights Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; Empathy; International human rights law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15657521720835102,"score_gpt":0.4789292384083872,"score_spread":0.3223540212000362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361002872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04594087,0.2126095,0.0031728824,0.29234287,0.004460917,0.00016700878,0.000463506,0.00012544803,0.44071704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6932242,0.20104334,0.004674557,0.03917,0.00050526974,0.00011781976,0.00032573642,0.0001150886,0.060824048],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99251705,0.0020300755,0.00015790948,0.00051906856,0.00342798,0.0013479107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904715,0.003186008,0.00039792788,0.00022739632,0.0038255637,0.0018916605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00933426,0.00045988467,0.00044050027,0.0037308712,0.015796432,0.009208813,0.0022988652,0.0021250157,0.008580941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016429055,0.00039392186,0.00028786255,0.008355767,0.014172853,0.003409827,0.0037343893,0.0031795972,0.0005201879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000307215,0.000079098725,0.0069669276,0.0019318702,0.00003574802,0.00059845636,0.104941785,0.0004096497,0.00036068825,0.28347,0.30326432,0.29791072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016791177,0.000019239105,0.011351955,0.001895666,0.000036826783,0.00017241997,0.045298543,0.0001484993,0.00017441098,0.010026543,0.93080974,0.0000493427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99386954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18242873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18242873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3163038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9482668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029483","doi":"10.1353/sch.2015.0025","title":"The Clerks of the Four Horsemen (Part II, George Sutherland and Pierce Butler)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Economic Justice; Law; Civil servant; Peck (Imperial); Character (mathematics); Management; Sociology; Art history; Classics; History; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.1013316183136096,"score_gpt":0.3137323234569229,"score_spread":0.21240070514331333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011191088,0.02381422,0.0012384305,0.11379769,0.06490655,0.00037683517,0.0007711264,0.00040721512,0.7834968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009986272,0.0024308532,0.00024763378,0.005383256,0.0016216966,0.000044204913,0.00017174009,0.0000883888,0.980026],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994343,0.000070398615,0.000021346701,0.00009460972,0.0002556466,0.00012367826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880147,0.000120640194,0.00006478765,0.000043015996,0.00042527236,0.00054474303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000646324,0.0005159557,0.0003172008,0.0005297031,0.002712193,0.0025728703,0.00051402755,0.0015591207,0.26663208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025782075,0.00033036055,0.00018553366,0.0003591,0.0007950129,0.0014887708,0.0019218004,0.002271521,0.07750429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007934375,0.000016375689,0.00024163864,0.00002172449,5.660509e-7,0.000049316735,0.00010096965,0.0000096328595,0.0001110519,0.0011632126,0.9802644,0.01801318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025838178,0.00001111838,0.0008975198,0.00004852397,9.12923e-7,0.0001005696,0.0003447697,0.000021861957,0.00010132186,0.00012509957,0.99834204,0.0000036992462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014802031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04203352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26663208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019512353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004065121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89197314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361191514","doi":"10.32920/22341337.v1","title":"The E-Team Project: A Teamwork Approach to Clinical Legal Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Notice; Legal education; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Passion; Public relations; Political science; Law; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.23590821743648063,"score_gpt":0.5363241850429693,"score_spread":0.3004159676064887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361191514","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11946541,0.0013374455,0.45527562,0.0675391,0.0022962554,0.0030679035,0.0001787419,0.0015041584,0.34933537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6277543,0.0014246773,0.3055414,0.004861238,0.0003721252,0.0020888245,0.00020208608,0.00029171418,0.05746363],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986198,0.010854303,0.00022610059,0.00071193086,0.0009827686,0.0010270028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860821,0.005377185,0.00048015628,0.0009578133,0.0007210632,0.006381727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011176066,0.0005550269,0.00028433732,0.0017831671,0.008925566,0.008013082,0.0029590619,0.002716149,0.013312277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010793381,0.00039849427,0.00050328835,0.0014590125,0.0136220595,0.004612669,0.012502021,0.003480221,0.0024809274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001401397,0.0024646951,0.0067540575,0.00066529354,0.000049497095,0.0020885742,0.16604976,0.0034624874,0.0014441774,0.21479027,0.12262439,0.47946662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034771446,0.0009934821,0.007192791,0.00091554143,0.000024218944,0.0013137371,0.19666608,0.005127361,0.0013512849,0.15193453,0.63403773,0.000095456206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080545405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023250451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013312277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046748864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01984738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059105396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361270095","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2705219/v1","title":"Teaching, learning, and assessment of law on medical students' cognitive, affective and psychomotor skills: a systematic review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Psychomotor learning; Medical education; Psychology; Curriculum; Checklist; Legal education; Cognitive apprenticeship; Cognition; Medicine; Pedagogy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.15904229704291103,"score_gpt":0.6396357525131124,"score_spread":0.4805934554702014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361270095","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044528423,0.99360955,0.00024018635,0.00027270772,0.0001084231,0.0006337516,0.00027658965,0.000012787388,0.0003932849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048349995,0.94816947,0.0011232274,0.0005736006,0.00012727924,0.001281611,0.0002278024,0.000009113582,0.0001378505],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99087185,0.0032012463,0.0030835965,0.0005932622,0.0019935747,0.0002565764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95741403,0.032657105,0.005194288,0.00053315173,0.0037164357,0.000485057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009265006,0.0011566635,0.0064397347,0.006768921,0.0008500224,0.0024158636,0.0018426205,0.0017650014,0.0033889783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04460411,0.0008658255,0.0054211016,0.0080392165,0.0009122325,0.0023745177,0.0013616729,0.0010127415,0.00027475576],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027163132,0.000095494885,0.0015517228,0.9336038,0.006559276,0.00008594987,0.0004965025,0.00006438803,0.00012620988,0.0001407887,0.0010756786,0.05592844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003740291,0.00050777267,0.009182974,0.91667044,0.059131946,0.00032289696,0.0007625737,0.00012644428,0.00028279034,0.00022956732,0.012358802,0.00004987397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076376186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022491314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009265006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031384903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01305702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048998594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362674241","doi":"10.52547/johepal.4.1.161","title":"Examining Complexities of Equity and Social Justice Education: An Interview with Prof. Ann Lopez","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Higher Education Policy And Leadership Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; University of Toronto","keywords":"Equity (law); Social justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.7094451482619862,"score_gpt":0.5597629988319869,"score_spread":0.14968214942999936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362674241","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07956373,0.0030733794,0.00075315504,0.90177375,0.0015013114,0.0001337849,0.00008244717,0.00002163167,0.0130968625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6118308,0.006183574,0.0019159528,0.34567127,0.001258205,0.000500045,0.000060741215,0.000081027254,0.032498386],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919105,0.0056639784,0.00022423288,0.00036534807,0.0010268064,0.0008091016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978686,0.014780674,0.00095521717,0.00020287352,0.0024587738,0.0029165142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009858427,0.00043088006,0.0005408726,0.0011022661,0.01606715,0.0044044247,0.0016492067,0.0079209525,0.002862394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023835532,0.00080268196,0.00050586555,0.0010916694,0.0068070455,0.005737364,0.004174706,0.017439486,0.00034164093],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011964308,0.00019219787,0.0083424905,0.00027338404,0.000017793775,0.005726319,0.6688177,0.00083450606,0.0028763923,0.018709382,0.27788714,0.016203031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017167851,0.000095315256,0.0053659286,0.0003819268,0.000011749939,0.0014784336,0.6482307,0.00054331764,0.0005287478,0.0029087302,0.3403293,0.00010870996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041037187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06647818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041037187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010070055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0081953285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08159667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366117334","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4419062","title":"Putting the Bar Exam to the Test: An Examination of the Predictive Validity of Bar Exam Outcomes on Lawyering Effectiveness","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Test (biology); Predictive validity; Psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.044812075539805055,"score_gpt":0.3690551478502108,"score_spread":0.3242430723104058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366117334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964161,0.00018932216,0.00026147347,0.00047819,0.00006320728,0.000035371537,0.00027953225,0.000011856515,0.0022649532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878734,0.00011136815,0.00017218254,0.00008273708,0.000056715537,0.000042566135,0.00038028145,0.00001144383,0.0003554348],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.987855,0.0057355957,0.0012405161,0.0010619235,0.0032442003,0.00086269237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71971357,0.21873643,0.031335343,0.010887895,0.009910983,0.009415776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027914278,0.00077321613,0.0010302283,0.0028474974,0.001228525,0.0019921295,0.0029165307,0.0026947842,0.0061913934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15616757,0.00048021504,0.0017701859,0.002133505,0.0023675347,0.003786855,0.0026540651,0.0038426826,0.0010186844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054436026,0.00074934284,0.9920831,0.000033014265,0.00026450725,0.000029977042,0.0003306599,0.00018687667,0.00005300866,0.00026421327,0.00039094692,0.005069887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008666742,0.0011740952,0.991836,0.000093090064,0.0003652745,0.00007151328,0.0008794514,0.0038613675,0.00028071814,0.00071250205,0.0006113333,0.000027976574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041279555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053481515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027914278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088677224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023315095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14762652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366777588","doi":"10.56726/irjmets36633","title":"NOVEL MECHANISM FOR STUDENT GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Mechanism (biology); Political science; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.10568483590667765,"score_gpt":0.4898452469506097,"score_spread":0.38416041104393206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366777588","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096589915,0.0011731705,0.7616649,0.00285468,0.003025538,0.0019662336,0.00069987634,0.066566065,0.06545967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7420447,0.00065378466,0.17118266,0.0019523562,0.00074932555,0.001450928,0.0012595607,0.0019317556,0.078775],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682426,0.0005478628,0.00022340655,0.00072942255,0.0011730117,0.0005020865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961914,0.00070602784,0.0003513693,0.001315178,0.0009768602,0.00045917358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024343715,0.0008276575,0.00074548036,0.0016371335,0.0018204863,0.0026246097,0.0031912297,0.0019778672,0.022077538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006188484,0.0004391322,0.00087791024,0.0007257333,0.0011154175,0.0041761715,0.0054958463,0.0016614792,0.00852159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031031428,0.002246515,0.011157128,0.001122865,0.00021935976,0.0036634586,0.0062300945,0.0028094472,0.13349764,0.09721573,0.10591431,0.63282025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007833077,0.0023518829,0.009407639,0.0003290091,0.0004251847,0.006393019,0.002061583,0.16346563,0.23232478,0.042589035,0.53923804,0.0006308964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076564896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047105827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022077538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065463985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010106517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07385671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367851661","doi":"","title":"The Dalhousie Dentistry Story: A Case for Proportionality, Professionalism, and the Promotion of Moral Character","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Proportionality (law); Promotion (chess); Psychology; Dentistry; Medicine; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6031934809514475,"score_gpt":0.6526919066288669,"score_spread":0.049498425677419355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367851661","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019755475,0.0018446301,0.0005569466,0.87625325,0.0012537276,0.000021753955,0.000060107108,0.000024291747,0.10022978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5428303,0.0030176279,0.0012829555,0.3502192,0.0015600051,0.00011692047,0.00003390911,0.00014330396,0.10079585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.99123996,0.003549309,0.00017580428,0.00086908333,0.0014071795,0.0027585467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98665327,0.0066554234,0.0008050474,0.00064337923,0.0014557533,0.0037870554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008566604,0.00062469085,0.00089801,0.0010813202,0.054867316,0.018243974,0.0029976575,0.030134324,0.013009612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015721364,0.0009296896,0.00069122325,0.0013355706,0.08422789,0.013919942,0.011627677,0.0612303,0.0011722791],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009465149,0.000098992816,0.0011177317,0.00006033124,0.000019346053,0.002676367,0.11332259,0.00013712958,0.00028535348,0.697512,0.1782199,0.006455617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004689946,0.000039507882,0.001543488,0.00020489004,0.000015932743,0.0008775641,0.12649125,0.00018829544,0.000441429,0.07325451,0.7967756,0.00012073028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32064998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44138196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32064998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040250096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029054604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63756716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367857059","doi":"10.14507/er.v30.3735","title":"Review of Duck and cover: Confronting and correcting dubious practices in education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Political science; Sociology; History; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.07656885864188614,"score_gpt":0.48789012800544745,"score_spread":0.4113212693635613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367857059","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000065155284,0.98826724,0.00013701912,0.008060638,0.0015359903,0.000028131997,0.000053989515,0.0000060477005,0.0018457063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021265598,0.989852,0.00050110585,0.005704592,0.00087889336,0.000046545603,0.000060800652,0.000009757781,0.0008197587],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98871917,0.004612129,0.0017560094,0.00047989943,0.004097464,0.00033528026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95286685,0.028783182,0.0031320353,0.0012669112,0.013312933,0.00063813984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017006325,0.00089253817,0.0023526407,0.01239145,0.0016087336,0.0037765023,0.002325187,0.0037292887,0.0054002167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07283588,0.0005121837,0.00092780346,0.010968962,0.004226329,0.0049464814,0.0028666216,0.0028596949,0.001575095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048809394,0.000025567355,0.00021040975,0.04949681,0.00016482113,0.00007878785,0.0009785993,0.00015254457,0.000100407815,0.021137683,0.31111333,0.6164923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014226118,0.000035833487,0.001232757,0.08128755,0.00014972826,0.00015544485,0.00030983114,0.000026652357,0.000094655414,0.0031749785,0.91350055,0.000017773644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017288733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045528628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017288733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00651046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021267716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08993912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058610","doi":"10.7202/1098594ar","title":"Making Meaning: Indigenous Legal Education and Student Action","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Internship; Meaning (existential); Legal education; Practice of law; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Action (physics); Legal research; Legal profession; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10166086787338059,"score_gpt":0.4433395643533455,"score_spread":0.3416786964799649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16521725,0.013690032,0.0019978927,0.36045894,0.00102455,0.000032904027,0.000045701894,0.000040227333,0.4574926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711827,0.0030107703,0.00037035384,0.0061800745,0.00018032882,0.000033102686,0.000011174207,0.000011495934,0.0190201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951691,0.003519171,0.000064586035,0.00016994486,0.00044466593,0.0006326134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953908,0.0028203644,0.00042858583,0.00016426419,0.00027461792,0.0009214585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004159624,0.00020341222,0.00020121664,0.00049042056,0.007149806,0.007354183,0.0007474939,0.0043598893,0.008744248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103162285,0.00012540877,0.00017941896,0.00076099613,0.026903035,0.007844554,0.0078031644,0.0040623634,0.0005322544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028326464,0.0001560534,0.0024843123,0.0001320516,0.000005752478,0.000299068,0.32955354,0.000095819145,0.00012269455,0.5989581,0.02620552,0.0419587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002742648,0.000075204945,0.009888344,0.0008089273,0.000019166207,0.00020007753,0.4030018,0.0003501884,0.00040484863,0.37011465,0.2150679,0.000041460724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023634382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046918284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023634382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005311288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010409252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046993613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376607321","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4433831","title":"Supervising Students in Clinical Legal Education: Handbook with Exercises","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Mathematics education; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.038610730692587567,"score_gpt":0.4456353583074357,"score_spread":0.40702462761484814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376607321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040504552,0.21114804,0.30298257,0.042772435,0.020753665,0.031258136,0.0071991924,0.019418407,0.32396302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06173461,0.12372924,0.56327796,0.01393712,0.0053906045,0.021698939,0.004529523,0.0016230092,0.20407905],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977531,0.0008051446,0.0004353162,0.0001926674,0.00056236464,0.00025144964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99431074,0.0032731052,0.00038992811,0.00027171444,0.00093756674,0.00081690244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034840105,0.0030574794,0.0026622138,0.003518535,0.001104079,0.0016838883,0.0033361586,0.0037015085,0.01973462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008119231,0.0015622535,0.0009666778,0.0016231114,0.0009935863,0.001945404,0.0030427303,0.004115603,0.017416393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018748001,0.0031955643,0.0012562762,0.0023594298,0.000024198109,0.0007032777,0.0013566805,0.0026075442,0.0024376274,0.0013005038,0.32693523,0.6576362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003978604,0.0014697865,0.028997,0.011348985,0.000053442393,0.0073450645,0.0035080481,0.0025580283,0.0034648313,0.011537081,0.9290995,0.0002203512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015988605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052055144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01973462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001009497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002677868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06601888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239643","doi":"10.1515/9780773569195-009","title":"The Ontario Advocacy Act: Representing Persons with Intellectual Disabilities","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual disability; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.0389393197477739,"score_gpt":0.27168604161354676,"score_spread":0.23274672186577286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009384816,0.0141380485,0.00070821116,0.18282714,0.0018835054,0.00020182054,0.00048426696,0.00005866472,0.7903136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09743935,0.010020528,0.0017126517,0.033957366,0.00036738854,0.00030884656,0.00024513414,0.000080665,0.855868],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956553,0.00066165446,0.000111979956,0.00014816498,0.0021710563,0.0012518631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639255,0.0009272278,0.00022573512,0.00013326416,0.0011551052,0.0011661972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003376794,0.0006738372,0.00037881787,0.0020036078,0.023236074,0.007193277,0.002850201,0.010612758,0.016378555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076897903,0.00069496053,0.00041103875,0.0031617756,0.008447228,0.0031780892,0.0044899937,0.005163732,0.0024474743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017361808,0.000023870301,0.0020400109,0.0001435028,0.000005262933,0.00024593607,0.027890028,0.00009177077,0.00015838885,0.16141014,0.7774779,0.030495761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065881386,0.0000039285583,0.0032453372,0.00013748452,0.000006431383,0.000058435544,0.008191069,0.000037632373,0.000045394474,0.002603346,0.9856511,0.000013280539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9839318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08535351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08535351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20924278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61928594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377250550","doi":"10.1515/9780228012252-018","title":"The Limits of Adjudication in the First-Year Curriculum: The Recurring History of Legal Process at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Law; Legal education; Legal history; Curriculum; Legal process; Political science; Process (computing); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0373865117675953,"score_gpt":0.27902580026400925,"score_spread":0.24163928849641395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377250550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03633396,0.044217683,0.0041896813,0.2403172,0.0030450246,0.00008687009,0.0002819236,0.00017508873,0.67135257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6128114,0.016808877,0.0018267906,0.01042523,0.0008275059,0.000102831036,0.00017402894,0.00013250856,0.3568908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99365765,0.0017435814,0.00013315945,0.00034762517,0.002514205,0.0016038684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897161,0.0034847436,0.0006053472,0.00049852254,0.001841802,0.0038534743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057729976,0.0002754495,0.00035970545,0.0010634116,0.008479476,0.014224264,0.0016660604,0.0039610453,0.012009438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013237464,0.0005428187,0.00017265683,0.001659308,0.022801451,0.0059209657,0.005018244,0.0074735847,0.0012173965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015626756,0.000042036005,0.0010320581,0.00016181715,0.000001558411,0.0001515524,0.053757746,0.00022344485,0.000229547,0.7240723,0.15917638,0.061135955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010152154,0.000021138232,0.0050131683,0.0006779579,0.0000029445075,0.000107593354,0.013225781,0.0002565609,0.0002636408,0.050281376,0.93011886,0.000020818774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.526161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73779064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9205289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07947112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10448896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95325905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377250570","doi":"10.1515/9780228012252","title":"Law, Life, and the Teaching of Legal History","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal history; Legal education; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.026178121770781826,"score_gpt":0.26128498455647714,"score_spread":0.23510686278569531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377250570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004066934,0.048736677,0.00077113387,0.035834596,0.0011934554,0.000021155087,0.00006807287,0.00009414387,0.90921384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14939332,0.040041354,0.0014185648,0.0115097165,0.0008068183,0.00005410425,0.0001260748,0.00010808449,0.796542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989479,0.00025294055,0.000013423601,0.00005700437,0.00046531274,0.00026339758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989949,0.00029318882,0.00004568482,0.000040415267,0.00024154138,0.0003843194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007319831,0.00044438674,0.0002010519,0.0018105556,0.012676027,0.0073010637,0.00092041056,0.0016787482,0.00865424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016074711,0.00021602746,0.00015158168,0.0024090242,0.024419399,0.0032498844,0.0019603719,0.0030267958,0.0018395775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006816077,0.0000212981,0.00031458412,0.00009105662,0.0000015619016,0.00012184061,0.036039542,0.00012153086,0.00013623538,0.6707555,0.24190736,0.050482664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016492108,0.0000032350056,0.0006659857,0.00014522248,9.971376e-7,0.000032714957,0.0076429984,0.00003905097,0.000044502904,0.022381335,0.96903694,0.000005393478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7390252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89602923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94855183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051448178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060837682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52502346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377260962","doi":"10.1515/9780773572898-006","title":"Turmoil in Toronto: The Provincial University","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regional science; Media studies; Political science; Geography; Economic history; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.022874217198337363,"score_gpt":0.2701043623053456,"score_spread":0.24723014510700825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377260962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05354685,0.0556369,0.00046637777,0.12338735,0.0032974756,0.000092161,0.0019251079,0.00023267607,0.76141506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25942653,0.009814512,0.0002762757,0.003410769,0.00027186214,0.000038189748,0.00030786032,0.00011784458,0.72633606],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991849,0.00009657057,0.00001886825,0.00005334059,0.00016073152,0.00048572375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902713,0.0000628723,0.00004363826,0.00003130546,0.00015410305,0.00068098586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004479034,0.00049074064,0.00041846404,0.0009594127,0.021458393,0.00771868,0.0010562551,0.0026265949,0.043862633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013924543,0.0006166891,0.00034995767,0.0030486481,0.0051905476,0.001496823,0.003431174,0.0040346137,0.0026361009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005985728,0.000025487134,0.005217993,0.000223554,0.000012150717,0.0010115242,0.038495585,0.00055281597,0.0001723856,0.2489008,0.6516617,0.05366623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054009015,0.000009212537,0.012448473,0.00014583484,0.000005527657,0.00008121244,0.015474595,0.0000808558,0.000049677088,0.0024465518,0.96923584,0.00001671838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9746835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91118956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08881044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12258303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6443678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378437532","doi":"10.1515/9781553393429-003","title":"Ontario ’s System of Higher Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.02972352600579627,"score_gpt":0.2677917184839233,"score_spread":0.23806819247812702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378437532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008153388,0.0033716434,0.0005750368,0.020991769,0.0007236216,0.00013749162,0.0048178933,0.0003000162,0.96092904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023018481,0.0013689802,0.00070540904,0.0010795697,0.00005481958,0.00004496427,0.00052156235,0.00007051658,0.9731356],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713576,0.00015811944,0.00007646149,0.00018105158,0.0015500709,0.0008985413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746895,0.00015903184,0.00008462961,0.00013398494,0.0013229767,0.0008304526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009581804,0.00053161784,0.00043627745,0.0024486925,0.012311132,0.008417016,0.0010794109,0.0025049127,0.07319489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023790062,0.00077609584,0.0004510251,0.005821712,0.00293606,0.0017599998,0.0015686234,0.0018954978,0.009263329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003193422,0.000021998845,0.0025001466,0.00018343222,0.000011200563,0.00016124819,0.0024194198,0.0002026587,0.0001816605,0.15453053,0.79388344,0.045872375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056528575,0.0000044279122,0.0057085585,0.00003654362,0.0000030085184,0.000024955189,0.00042290354,0.000059903847,0.000028065551,0.0013322171,0.99236274,0.000011056028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98804444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8904854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10951458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25948328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7945876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378439642","doi":"10.1515/9780773573239","title":"My Life at the Bar and Beyond","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.023952508837816914,"score_gpt":0.27008290070856916,"score_spread":0.24613039187075225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378439642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030204235,0.031177469,0.002120847,0.2243504,0.007152684,0.0000243223,0.00003962141,0.00012036836,0.7319939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040717855,0.0062764273,0.0009738221,0.04313723,0.001807366,0.000045515284,0.00002503767,0.00007686424,0.90693986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988926,0.0005128451,0.00001464521,0.000113065595,0.00028852848,0.0001783742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914956,0.00023700179,0.00004349191,0.000045836532,0.00020739019,0.00031675625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010276728,0.00047203683,0.0003157098,0.0007667778,0.012205279,0.0085286675,0.0009878051,0.0035297493,0.025556544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025882772,0.00025224037,0.00024257235,0.00061215804,0.007260684,0.006810363,0.0025919715,0.008276547,0.0097329235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068384606,0.00003566926,0.00011877378,0.000035468347,0.0000016120115,0.00014995725,0.011934839,0.000032954777,0.00009064003,0.21156551,0.7407766,0.035251208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011921162,0.000009221977,0.00009094363,0.00012509486,8.572491e-7,0.000114508446,0.0040728445,0.000025569643,0.000039204522,0.010456454,0.9850605,0.0000036049776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010120815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019736294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004119318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00342618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085495114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380142288","doi":"10.32920/22223248.v1","title":"Law and Technology in Legal Education: A Systemic Approach at Ryerson","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Key (lock); Legal practice; Engineering ethics; Legal research; Legal service; Practice of law; Political science; Law; Sociology; Legal profession; Engineering management; Engineering; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.06414862003054714,"score_gpt":0.38949205250930413,"score_spread":0.32534343247875697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380142288","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1300754,0.011151682,0.04167047,0.448257,0.00043057394,0.00012469228,0.000077821605,0.0003294703,0.36788285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8550624,0.0072626104,0.025066195,0.010534983,0.00015733647,0.00014680889,0.000038844286,0.000116701965,0.10161394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917854,0.0056620594,0.00017109992,0.00073587993,0.0009680047,0.0006776859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944593,0.0028229677,0.0004008163,0.00042320674,0.0006902433,0.001203521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077134226,0.00023316141,0.00047651978,0.0012844151,0.007518401,0.013357769,0.0010532943,0.0036022163,0.007756145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004799666,0.0005529617,0.00029970464,0.00080338476,0.016364817,0.005895701,0.0067075766,0.0060589807,0.0009079597],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017462666,0.00018785238,0.0016377363,0.00016731456,0.000009483626,0.00038157596,0.029337315,0.0008857113,0.00154402,0.87461525,0.027104804,0.06411146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028546507,0.00019608795,0.006623591,0.00092810503,0.000028150449,0.00048949185,0.045399882,0.0042320495,0.0057099583,0.23001622,0.70626354,0.000084375155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03797695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057656422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018061118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020294968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1310432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380229014","doi":"10.1515/9780773586475","title":"Telling it to the Judge","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.054758201044662794,"score_gpt":0.29095291247750193,"score_spread":0.23619471143283916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380229014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015746856,0.0095016295,0.0012717975,0.46119228,0.018716179,0.000030417246,0.00019810471,0.00011686116,0.507398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02121649,0.0021933434,0.00048206266,0.21158847,0.00218459,0.000042775948,0.00007962387,0.00011840468,0.76209426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834085,0.00027609293,0.000048473772,0.00026887676,0.00066831865,0.00039733693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878937,0.0004029616,0.000030621195,0.000069533744,0.00050827727,0.00019930961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001358614,0.0003488857,0.0004609149,0.0006231964,0.011431372,0.0072828312,0.0009487469,0.008675211,0.023610074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070344745,0.0002878771,0.0005137449,0.00060505874,0.0056619993,0.006881842,0.0021857687,0.01499079,0.0077059255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050564977,0.000006010761,0.000078637895,0.000014538047,0.0000013543295,0.000078642996,0.001178969,0.000027897413,0.000059706286,0.21741092,0.7736583,0.007480039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043065047,0.0000036049237,0.0000967625,0.000060552433,0.0000023154212,0.000040924373,0.0011412282,0.000035667686,0.00006142615,0.02596823,0.9725767,0.00000825827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09576857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19508632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09576857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006539376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010742396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1904223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380300480","doi":"","title":"LEARNING FROM BEAR-WALKER: INDIGENOUS LEGAL ORDERS AND INTERCULTURAL LEGAL EDUCATION IN CANADIAN LAW SCHOOLS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal education; Law; Political science; Legal pluralism; Legal research; Legal realism; Sociology","score_opus":0.19312281502476625,"score_gpt":0.578933036925031,"score_spread":0.3858102219002647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380300480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6911869,0.0017268122,0.0018625354,0.04764142,0.00020210334,0.00014232866,0.000075156655,0.000083560495,0.25707912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684114,0.0008622239,0.0009866401,0.001580114,0.0000133574285,0.000019899588,0.00002171046,0.000016474492,0.028088074],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996201,0.00074958144,0.000054166216,0.0003362816,0.0011567372,0.0015023173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966864,0.00062590814,0.00025927575,0.00009706128,0.00086312613,0.0014683454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034215478,0.00033803147,0.0002549189,0.002237093,0.043008953,0.008434776,0.0020833523,0.002027278,0.010077269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006557648,0.00036382844,0.00027346864,0.0021832387,0.01739237,0.004151502,0.0073469393,0.003922697,0.00037344694],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022223947,0.00018535143,0.018574746,0.000108640095,0.0000069580897,0.0006337395,0.7844436,0.00029905146,0.0006297541,0.09750773,0.015027763,0.08256051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007948632,0.000040957453,0.030919561,0.00025729326,0.000015444664,0.00010499186,0.76960355,0.00036289426,0.00041642235,0.0061388835,0.19207156,0.00006049755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99629825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.895768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10423202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18075562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7562598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380421093","doi":"10.14264/0e10db9","title":"Access to Justice for First Nations People in Queensland: Exploring Complaints and Conciliation Experiences Through the Queensland Human Rights Commission","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The University of Queensland","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Commission; Economic Justice; Human rights; Political science; Law; Public administration; Mediation","score_opus":0.10596891579232613,"score_gpt":0.38292995462953006,"score_spread":0.2769610388372039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380421093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9226337,0.0013186197,0.00021595969,0.034569915,0.00021235662,0.00009516914,0.00005829624,0.000016139616,0.040879805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98062897,0.0005946762,0.00013420093,0.0044075474,0.000045123914,0.00006128675,0.000017377932,0.000025468913,0.014085252],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809398,0.009452575,0.0002697876,0.0006468018,0.0015971405,0.007093946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96789485,0.017187199,0.0031098626,0.00071628514,0.0025827205,0.008509083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012067023,0.00039223934,0.0009593391,0.0017125052,0.064119205,0.01710586,0.0031332865,0.007917709,0.013619568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027218044,0.0010088971,0.0005590109,0.003374102,0.0277638,0.00983878,0.019577919,0.012822319,0.0006137728],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000825317,0.000022842347,0.0015696381,0.000020848594,0.0000020537282,0.00036355047,0.99311924,0.000011073186,0.000034812583,0.0023760733,0.0013798339,0.0010918383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018482684,0.00001303089,0.0024027943,0.000054438275,0.0000018222308,0.00004795427,0.9898101,0.000008407199,0.000009834423,0.00020351344,0.0074394606,0.0000067871847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4339765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63424575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4339765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037099786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060121614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.862901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380630757","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.208","title":"An Analysis of Criminology as a Profession in the Republic of South Africa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Criminology; Restructuring; Constructive; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.16195726561794696,"score_gpt":0.45314258911747857,"score_spread":0.29118532349953163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380630757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96126026,0.016030172,0.00041379157,0.0053098663,0.000051995048,0.00028476983,0.001033509,0.0000045020256,0.01561112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99206686,0.0059882565,0.0002724997,0.00022332124,0.000009717522,0.00008632485,0.00016561437,0.000004768946,0.0011826793],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979107,0.0007342901,0.00021485578,0.00015674009,0.00047233826,0.00051102345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992668,0.004168614,0.00167376,0.0001139936,0.00088722067,0.0004884698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024134053,0.0002198758,0.00040686235,0.008579659,0.0025396517,0.0029667078,0.00052502303,0.0005526382,0.005293364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009072391,0.0002870724,0.00046403008,0.016122838,0.0016748873,0.0016137648,0.0025486264,0.0007330267,0.00018018135],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024470658,0.00015390628,0.34318653,0.015859673,0.000358566,0.0059665446,0.4725164,0.0009298544,0.0021438773,0.040553063,0.0054997215,0.11258725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008738914,0.000044015567,0.59633833,0.004419939,0.00015462232,0.0006247125,0.3564459,0.0003685113,0.00022595657,0.0011569478,0.040187936,0.000024407895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.120776236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21177194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120776236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013477986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019390041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24014646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380924600","doi":"","title":"Misogyny in Health Professions? An Analysis of the Dalhousie Dentistry Scandal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Dentistry; Health professions; Political science; Medicine; Health care; Law","score_opus":0.4985459042945467,"score_gpt":0.6686955071452225,"score_spread":0.17014960285067582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380924600","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16178693,0.016887214,0.00058859814,0.61504495,0.0033179782,0.000030612242,0.000075033015,0.00004199212,0.20222665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8729101,0.00438566,0.00025973434,0.071458414,0.0010825093,0.00003995726,0.000024631277,0.00006285056,0.049776085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782874,0.008185148,0.0006103424,0.0011379232,0.0054894425,0.0062896386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850643,0.00787783,0.0018822543,0.00057187374,0.00228844,0.0023152507],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013752349,0.0005276527,0.0007856862,0.0038106185,0.044366885,0.023781136,0.00234112,0.014667775,0.0058955443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01674096,0.00058997644,0.0005164539,0.0037340876,0.06090129,0.008445931,0.011717286,0.011080387,0.0006435252],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097093165,0.000059439437,0.0034998774,0.00023527247,0.000021945307,0.0021363941,0.39765665,0.00014967605,0.00023711604,0.5011886,0.079560176,0.015157737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001465023,0.000024381738,0.010215213,0.0005272649,0.000015323176,0.00026317578,0.4193213,0.0001308311,0.00029185478,0.020098263,0.54900795,0.00008987286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37772375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49307743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98533225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045307565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058911715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7510503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380926266","doi":"10.3138/ctr.103.012","title":"Legal Advocate’s Report on the Findings of The Squeegee Project, 9 June 1999","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03820559548963203,"score_gpt":0.34599141082112744,"score_spread":0.3077858153314954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380926266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06301462,0.013613082,0.002237037,0.32917124,0.01377128,0.0028441253,0.020427883,0.0006451745,0.55427545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16096453,0.012441761,0.003689752,0.113850795,0.0016207033,0.0018125819,0.009151739,0.0004375087,0.69603056],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98632485,0.0011640941,0.0003517206,0.00044403554,0.010018603,0.0016967831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98446333,0.0033376245,0.0009525097,0.0004788042,0.008532955,0.0022348734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010972697,0.00037245906,0.00036690405,0.002918864,0.01059209,0.005636419,0.0016455357,0.005184081,0.023323767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041618068,0.00056699617,0.0004952495,0.0041063474,0.0019678252,0.0015784475,0.0037759747,0.0052297963,0.003907922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008840255,0.00005278184,0.004824676,0.00020725455,0.000012214296,0.00068414985,0.004068889,0.000039914306,0.00031811127,0.0060842414,0.9628,0.020819347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002170043,0.00006055878,0.028250365,0.00018612706,0.000023697954,0.00018673441,0.010760924,0.000033154527,0.00067652133,0.00044484908,0.9593254,0.00002992852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5115271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73504907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48847288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011879942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041288484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381191545","doi":"10.4324/9781003015093","title":"Leading Works in Legal Ethics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.18045518468395552,"score_gpt":0.4753994365089715,"score_spread":0.29494425182501594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381191545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061912235,0.030762356,0.0017350938,0.046550393,0.006575008,0.000027222217,0.000036841,0.00012596048,0.9135681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03840974,0.02386155,0.002459191,0.023863323,0.004529866,0.00012193032,0.00007889324,0.00024804092,0.90642744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971853,0.0012638632,0.00006673913,0.00017902542,0.0010610096,0.00024400176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973793,0.0015508726,0.0001203886,0.00025686793,0.00042578403,0.00026682494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023124537,0.0007562984,0.0003921984,0.001785557,0.010268088,0.011990871,0.0011777584,0.003178426,0.020896211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047557233,0.00030410057,0.0004306587,0.0023726083,0.014391065,0.0070437333,0.0035923992,0.006293533,0.011794187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034425998,0.000008550023,0.000054250184,0.00007100169,0.0000012582404,0.00005037099,0.0049616173,0.000050662842,0.000024480127,0.7167948,0.25231415,0.025665408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000155738,0.0000024559981,0.0000392648,0.00022114789,9.351532e-7,0.0000417246,0.0011814914,0.000036936344,0.000025316856,0.049378783,0.9490678,0.0000025401296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007869287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017895257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020896211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008907367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012523419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069904864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382244745","doi":"10.1515/9781553395065-014","title":"Key and Emerging Issues in Canadian Higher Education Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Political science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.025117646329770996,"score_gpt":0.2877299246671509,"score_spread":0.26261227833737993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382244745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0089622615,0.033327498,0.0010299708,0.21537594,0.0030473487,0.00006103969,0.00021160793,0.00007353691,0.7379109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33035904,0.038861353,0.0031390893,0.05949051,0.0022679486,0.000097075856,0.00024454878,0.00016953176,0.5653709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990006,0.00097309274,0.00020738207,0.0006538951,0.005054888,0.0031047119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936985,0.0018687517,0.0001384955,0.0001959153,0.0028134545,0.0012848611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006385234,0.00081525254,0.000625869,0.0055204933,0.03185834,0.030867634,0.0044478034,0.01250666,0.025492154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011440779,0.00062779954,0.0007744026,0.011248527,0.028144782,0.006740085,0.003521196,0.01508607,0.0012713082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006887071,0.0000151433,0.00021354019,0.0000681189,0.000002756401,0.000107925756,0.0057846997,0.00017044535,0.00005766842,0.8529729,0.11898431,0.021615574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010592411,0.000008035988,0.0019415563,0.00047187644,0.000011574549,0.00007342732,0.012051735,0.00046523346,0.00009318678,0.087265424,0.89755774,0.000049635004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98776186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75090545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24909456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3209417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8709439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382245004","doi":"10.1515/9781553395065-001","title":"Introduction/Preface","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.026848925313467855,"score_gpt":0.2695088301637196,"score_spread":0.24265990485025177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382245004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012381496,0.014357987,0.0030157748,0.04423067,0.18130973,0.0004018338,0.0055732625,0.0008482554,0.7490243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005003895,0.0075845765,0.0010598929,0.008303961,0.03139356,0.00017870878,0.0032932204,0.000499501,0.9426827],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942446,0.000056629528,0.000038773636,0.000117896474,0.00030218996,0.000060157883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997509,0.00034700986,0.00011616394,0.00016093887,0.0013256713,0.0005412653],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008933805,0.0011176005,0.00071756495,0.0015006263,0.002442498,0.0042927894,0.0012433561,0.0014792808,0.34860647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047414135,0.00031861407,0.00037971453,0.0012881474,0.0007312117,0.003075054,0.0019636303,0.003980203,0.26306903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017183427,0.000017186376,0.000074522046,0.000077678975,7.9140233e-7,0.000036245652,0.00008312631,0.000026684611,0.00012395746,0.0025996359,0.9728171,0.024125794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016404149,0.000009409959,0.00017621252,0.0000806655,5.357383e-7,0.00003242814,0.000062385036,0.000012240955,0.000030648287,0.00072389474,0.99886775,0.0000021506842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047328346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046353773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34860647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018813135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018505607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92913383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382245666","doi":"10.4324/9781003312994-11","title":"Canadian Challenges and Initiatives in Teaching Family Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.1445837400648108,"score_gpt":0.38129338181135436,"score_spread":0.23670964174654355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382245666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017741544,0.047686577,0.0016373326,0.27419665,0.00379463,0.000105215666,0.00025526294,0.00030922954,0.65427357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2449182,0.05804603,0.009343245,0.021885524,0.0005550298,0.00011172391,0.00027281966,0.0002809841,0.66458637],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678326,0.0004311052,0.00005089623,0.00021134081,0.0014495087,0.0010739283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959046,0.00056062115,0.0000786618,0.00009804625,0.0015041044,0.0018539681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003999334,0.00038717355,0.0002959492,0.0021093325,0.0248462,0.010094722,0.0030053202,0.0036956787,0.024072925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004430067,0.00042621803,0.00046519266,0.004498824,0.007965148,0.0033861317,0.0027190954,0.0036220434,0.0015319138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013947969,0.000056414065,0.0009556222,0.00031249892,0.0000055592573,0.000595911,0.029639054,0.0002478979,0.00028277384,0.2969813,0.5510367,0.119872265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003820679,0.000006015595,0.0009410427,0.00013503984,0.0000033802048,0.00012553338,0.018060636,0.00010162572,0.00009280267,0.005042688,0.9754778,0.000009696598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99394083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14921933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14921933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26498857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382459203","doi":"10.1515/9781553394457-002","title":"A Note to Students","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.056846457330234544,"score_gpt":0.3369586686259485,"score_spread":0.28011221129571395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382459203","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003557835,0.0097090155,0.0019368881,0.4676994,0.099212974,0.00021230978,0.00070207607,0.0007359242,0.41623363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010567993,0.0026788248,0.0007988472,0.07570009,0.0064159464,0.000115573064,0.000121597775,0.00020259772,0.9033985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812657,0.00043429856,0.00009112083,0.0002961395,0.0007156001,0.00033632325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551576,0.00079974416,0.00017410747,0.00035407773,0.0015521516,0.001604188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001852718,0.00070671196,0.00053721364,0.00069263007,0.007849818,0.0075491485,0.0010439532,0.0042490936,0.09221877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010357868,0.00036882586,0.0004200283,0.0011776132,0.0023562405,0.0057522724,0.0048806258,0.008585441,0.040625565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006416768,0.000023741082,0.00011291122,0.000020934674,4.2903616e-7,0.000085439984,0.0011060621,0.000008154772,0.00007616923,0.004951291,0.979298,0.01431058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017242211,0.000008627051,0.00013000614,0.00004521498,4.6631084e-7,0.00005735749,0.001441932,0.000010135626,0.00003164752,0.00068478606,0.9975841,0.0000040066943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019711953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036801912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09221877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038270475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008084613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3085025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382681798","doi":"10.1515/9780773556188-007","title":"The Tree of Knowledge, the Axe of Power: Le Dain and the Transformation of Canadian Legal Education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Tree (set theory); Political science; Transformation (genetics); Law; Biology; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.016682722161522844,"score_gpt":0.25015279304815835,"score_spread":0.23347007088663552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382681798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007506577,0.021742528,0.0016129719,0.107721865,0.0009675012,0.00003300061,0.00013511488,0.00007208244,0.86020833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40792713,0.013271661,0.002524193,0.012269877,0.000407763,0.000056820667,0.00009961482,0.00019004634,0.5632529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689263,0.0006169808,0.000045285924,0.0002559559,0.001084668,0.001104597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799275,0.000728592,0.000081050064,0.000098512464,0.0005877584,0.0005114087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002708526,0.0006311635,0.0005144069,0.0027298217,0.025831902,0.017448753,0.0015493673,0.0050664456,0.015639443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00583848,0.00045683363,0.0003110888,0.0042798705,0.03976215,0.00820353,0.0039255726,0.007361587,0.001457385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007930647,0.0000073625915,0.00015856697,0.000036817837,0.0000016139123,0.00006239895,0.017498434,0.00012127169,0.00003179598,0.9099487,0.0542342,0.017890884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006780067,0.0000064349842,0.0009061797,0.00025788034,0.000004937437,0.000053327476,0.01488859,0.00023306061,0.000064498556,0.133065,0.8504861,0.000027110027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97440267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98923874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8556019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14439811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18089208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382863516","doi":"10.1515/9780773557574","title":"Connecting the Dots","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.034233244704630114,"score_gpt":0.2872913093449592,"score_spread":0.2530580646403291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382863516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010284907,0.015136355,0.00976787,0.47006685,0.010025318,0.0000743374,0.00009669154,0.00031588753,0.48423186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33701426,0.013931426,0.010371352,0.13218871,0.0021402626,0.00020252231,0.00010047576,0.0005138992,0.50353706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909933,0.0035630837,0.00019342032,0.0010457281,0.0026813268,0.0015231302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990528,0.003357715,0.0003296653,0.0009602086,0.002265764,0.0025587024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005268331,0.00055683596,0.00041585258,0.0016536264,0.022948561,0.015154628,0.0018589621,0.0069180154,0.03314479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01872409,0.00041757483,0.000306411,0.0018426699,0.030603977,0.015700622,0.0155476825,0.009586942,0.0061432547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025384797,0.00003191999,0.00043943748,0.00010213063,0.000004675036,0.00042566727,0.04836351,0.00010971624,0.00028702142,0.59558135,0.2824233,0.07220593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019165166,0.000007501927,0.00015301691,0.00012560844,0.0000015441791,0.00007040547,0.014298747,0.00006310239,0.00006971495,0.026057202,0.9591422,0.00000907799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1787603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23849615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1787603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021919372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037555885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3554396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383427395","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_121-1","title":"Framework of Considerations for Academic Integrity in Quality Assurance in Canadian Higher Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Academic integrity; Quality (philosophy); Higher education; Political science; Jurisdiction; Curriculum; Engineering management; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Business; Engineering; Operations management; Law; External quality assessment","score_opus":0.24590412210266446,"score_gpt":0.4924771975916611,"score_spread":0.24657307548899662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383427395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004294117,0.005570648,0.0136416005,0.08323062,0.00086360716,0.00017469942,0.00015977792,0.00007581172,0.8919891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5070519,0.007074876,0.037382316,0.025375627,0.0008712618,0.00048002924,0.00019202202,0.00017652502,0.42139542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98823637,0.003150515,0.0002600013,0.0007016582,0.0047265324,0.002924881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99306494,0.001673711,0.00020517249,0.0002534144,0.003621463,0.0011813913],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012131091,0.0010240342,0.00064591947,0.005223626,0.023287412,0.02341974,0.0046896706,0.011067024,0.008962444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011168965,0.0007251066,0.00095099764,0.0049228356,0.03544903,0.004948944,0.004227097,0.011292471,0.00105144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011731103,0.0000033436845,0.00003413565,0.000010756574,8.969904e-7,0.000031917698,0.0011829219,0.00018343912,0.000017225568,0.9867048,0.009634377,0.0021950924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137701245,0.000012126183,0.0011347706,0.000631555,0.0000202654,0.00018327312,0.0075254464,0.0016856376,0.00023760897,0.44773814,0.54074997,0.00006741495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95256203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96816874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98893297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17591807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27123848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95581824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383427919","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_129-1","title":"Enabling Ableism: Using Academic Integrity Arguments to Create Disability in Testing Environments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Ableism; Academic integrity; Normative; Misconduct; Cheating; Psychology; Scrutiny; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.28318413150842425,"score_gpt":0.43547314502942003,"score_spread":0.15228901352099578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383427919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008621931,0.0005569934,0.027027197,0.023566308,0.000303181,0.000035588673,0.000027221777,0.00010120746,0.9397603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7212402,0.00092048873,0.019104395,0.008808439,0.0002507073,0.00019202204,0.00005369829,0.00026147492,0.24916855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936412,0.0035969315,0.0001474788,0.0003981812,0.0014748902,0.0007414145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98845345,0.008372482,0.00040484164,0.0011886867,0.00089412177,0.00068645534],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007810433,0.00051207363,0.00031208756,0.0011084916,0.0043994007,0.011602605,0.0021879133,0.0057370015,0.017494272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020200197,0.00035598816,0.0005661082,0.0007259093,0.024155265,0.0140219815,0.010363729,0.008219553,0.0021512336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002916129,0.000014835929,0.000103681916,0.000011685125,0.00000129792,0.000052144136,0.0026849108,0.00013865007,0.00004236213,0.9858956,0.0045745275,0.0064774733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084935555,0.00001135468,0.00018981838,0.00014878824,0.0000068808104,0.00013708297,0.003182072,0.0006113967,0.0004757211,0.8901991,0.10501624,0.000013001889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033462767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055049076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039382773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056399372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05852413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383454547","doi":"10.1515/9780773559776-010","title":"7 Made in Manitoba: The Society and the Legal Profession Act","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Legal profession","score_opus":0.028549842511209688,"score_gpt":0.2737668877352587,"score_spread":0.24521704522404902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383454547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022725375,0.014592927,0.00032815986,0.04391446,0.001451686,0.00009458444,0.0004225056,0.000054164226,0.91641617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.110177726,0.005901047,0.00041921317,0.0092351,0.00013911471,0.00007811684,0.00014847289,0.000052795946,0.8738484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904627,0.00016582855,0.00002550583,0.000073424046,0.00025419952,0.00043484368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924856,0.00015292632,0.000044812492,0.000039724695,0.00025445278,0.00025950707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077737565,0.0006578022,0.00034293527,0.0014020851,0.021546645,0.008467906,0.0020359368,0.0056269853,0.03207479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001938742,0.0006386391,0.00041978376,0.0033714573,0.0072880043,0.002297728,0.0037462728,0.007365693,0.002936966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036079047,0.00008590255,0.0036321802,0.00018678949,0.000014086404,0.0016571666,0.051698554,0.00032422828,0.00050635426,0.6559268,0.25214383,0.03378806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001269335,0.000018567327,0.011270186,0.0005756206,0.000017993274,0.00017249008,0.046454042,0.00013918911,0.00026987042,0.010199802,0.9308339,0.000035674795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9454864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98671794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03295469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10597196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23910415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383703463","doi":"","title":"INTRODUCTION: GRADUATE STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Mathematics education; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6594110811179608,"score_gpt":0.6806798440367732,"score_spread":0.02126876291881241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383703463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00095132086,0.037925053,0.0010323742,0.17626831,0.20368478,0.000323425,0.0020035058,0.00067635253,0.57713497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065016747,0.013226394,0.00075198995,0.031678572,0.04325808,0.00025385228,0.0014497786,0.0005130193,0.90236664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929762,0.0009272459,0.00044337858,0.00089422235,0.0036337525,0.0011252235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887317,0.0010677389,0.0004336579,0.0011796975,0.003957588,0.004629688],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047654537,0.0013404792,0.001452663,0.0034978646,0.006227967,0.017936856,0.0030857273,0.008402907,0.32920602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018698512,0.0006814591,0.0010678042,0.004900271,0.00297403,0.010426413,0.011433495,0.0076896343,0.21558759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006315177,0.000020461894,0.00007428579,0.00007864978,9.484339e-7,0.000017108572,0.00013171043,0.000008034672,0.000023390625,0.009174274,0.95953083,0.030934084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018803397,0.000008457894,0.00015349725,0.00013971912,4.3135483e-7,0.000013082439,0.00011437874,0.000005497042,0.000006667082,0.0011973798,0.9983564,0.0000026061502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042883647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007192388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32920602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063493103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01086995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9568062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383960731","doi":"10.59703/ijrr.v5i1.44-51","title":"Participation as an expert in cases involving the production of mental health records in Canadian courts.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Risk and Recovery","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Production (economics); Psychology; Psychiatry; Economics","score_opus":0.038757697316222965,"score_gpt":0.40534492707723574,"score_spread":0.36658722976101277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383960731","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28660977,0.01504609,0.0092419265,0.3447762,0.0038949435,0.0018533675,0.0004947447,0.00017731966,0.33790562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8526451,0.003910702,0.00558699,0.06749023,0.00052950386,0.0002695776,0.00016799064,0.00004884789,0.06935112],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9497771,0.018295877,0.0020242564,0.0037441535,0.014959676,0.011198859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93649,0.032538176,0.0049424293,0.00152306,0.010273271,0.014233023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04213724,0.0005149912,0.00042259364,0.002901466,0.036928445,0.006006274,0.004334127,0.01281205,0.0066365716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094574735,0.00091137766,0.0005419509,0.0014862495,0.011746787,0.004411858,0.009700397,0.007803666,0.000983455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014476402,0.0002658894,0.03598768,0.00077270635,0.00005818396,0.033812575,0.5914873,0.00041524862,0.0039245836,0.08495802,0.13710797,0.111065105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000561135,0.0001392824,0.037402544,0.0017772951,0.00009037774,0.010815418,0.2700753,0.0011159263,0.002225522,0.012087566,0.66383487,0.00037978668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6545771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88877153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34542292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032073177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12036367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69491434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384166303","doi":"10.1515/9780773568075","title":"Chief Justice W.R. Jackett","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030964718099842303,"score_gpt":0.28729802610666433,"score_spread":0.256333308006822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384166303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009228898,0.031468306,0.0006967394,0.031840395,0.014088449,0.000039189443,0.00017828983,0.00013989967,0.9206259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003842015,0.0052675274,0.00022329538,0.005118816,0.00042731292,0.000012180548,0.000044684763,0.000039181654,0.985025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974686,0.000019567975,0.0000057360353,0.00005619629,0.00012180656,0.00004987474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997608,0.000040893137,0.000011263826,0.000009384571,0.00011431308,0.00006332578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025770918,0.0005258632,0.00023159324,0.0008079207,0.004013174,0.002660404,0.00049306586,0.0011520326,0.047375586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010239283,0.0002449548,0.00017728643,0.00063784805,0.0010371207,0.0018359307,0.0007781769,0.0032178345,0.021022012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038007433,0.000006186472,0.00006787816,0.000023255123,4.5722996e-7,0.000031339092,0.00024384423,0.00001346051,0.00005067696,0.012800357,0.9610061,0.025752464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.0429735e-7,0.0000019604831,0.00014733587,0.00003457823,4.6028538e-7,0.000039343307,0.00015799174,0.000008239684,0.00002296018,0.0006155127,0.9989698,0.000001129088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06697923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2523328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9330208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031624022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038447403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15848714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384168780","doi":"10.1515/9780773575776-017","title":"Wise Counsel: Bruce Trigger at McGill University","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; History","score_opus":0.02829537772473538,"score_gpt":0.25704675006667277,"score_spread":0.22875137234193738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384168780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014569284,0.019408176,0.0013237618,0.2916904,0.033530377,0.0001849918,0.0005611878,0.0011214613,0.65072274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014796216,0.0010868723,0.00018170616,0.018762331,0.0005874078,0.000019785859,0.00003339859,0.000100121884,0.9777489],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998992,0.00015225341,0.00002574992,0.0001328378,0.00050088787,0.00019632418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966884,0.00058918144,0.00012619836,0.000110409215,0.0011483824,0.0013374551],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012403044,0.00073791185,0.0006539545,0.0013381661,0.007947365,0.00423124,0.0014905673,0.006042803,0.35431197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006875753,0.00074255356,0.00033565576,0.0008040533,0.0011331582,0.0030039172,0.0022355586,0.0055341413,0.14134401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024793694,0.0000061077785,0.000034435096,0.000008990782,3.7571755e-7,0.000031487725,0.00009026509,0.0000048269253,0.000022927195,0.0008642601,0.9904895,0.008444453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030626531,0.000004192451,0.00016590173,0.0000555997,0.0000016724214,0.00007734375,0.00045059173,0.00001917822,0.000039830997,0.00061786757,0.9985592,0.000005654077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053485043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21117425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94651496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031863207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008290445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9209956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384523593","doi":"10.31338/2544-3135.si.2023-96.5","title":"INDIGENOUS CLASS PROCEEDINGS IN CANADA. AN EXAMINATION OF THE CONVERGENCE OF INDIGENOUS RIGHTS AND CLASS ACTIONS IN THE CANADIAN COMMON LAW SYSTEM","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Iuridica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Oppression; Class action; Law; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Collateral; Politics; Social science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.035685696185926506,"score_gpt":0.3142365295524686,"score_spread":0.2785508333665421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384523593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.558839,0.014778549,0.00073539186,0.056474503,0.0005329931,0.00025075654,0.00073752843,0.00008886586,0.36756235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94126225,0.003932611,0.00040878917,0.0046573267,0.000047433015,0.00003807742,0.00011941706,0.00002918918,0.049504932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937304,0.0003101638,0.000104630824,0.00034056237,0.0025059327,0.003008287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938552,0.00078507303,0.00056311436,0.00014183937,0.0022439703,0.002410775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024589077,0.00025200358,0.000340692,0.0042437487,0.043954793,0.009447862,0.002673769,0.0031400225,0.008601248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007761785,0.00040343078,0.00040461952,0.0055327397,0.013444727,0.0018308015,0.0051888046,0.003728876,0.0003163965],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102019,0.00020439323,0.06839026,0.00046609875,0.000066386485,0.0028830187,0.29150304,0.0006937851,0.0009090401,0.4215708,0.08308276,0.13012844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026682426,0.000050162413,0.22467904,0.0005089299,0.0000781439,0.0004648632,0.18338953,0.00064827787,0.000559575,0.007328888,0.5821102,0.00015574925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99843913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21424152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21424152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3224372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9113685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385211926","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2023.10460abstract","title":"Experts without Expertise: Repairing Professional Identity Through the Professional Motive","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Psychology; Professional development; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0840406410767058,"score_gpt":0.4478495527412988,"score_spread":0.363808911664593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385211926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.580264,0.0017946856,0.04066707,0.09171465,0.00076736417,0.00014265078,0.000023871917,0.00012188542,0.28450394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98673683,0.000305639,0.0032872814,0.0023756984,0.00008047966,0.0000358015,0.000008114982,0.000026471076,0.0071437634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831217,0.01100296,0.00028403648,0.0009662782,0.0021167055,0.002508274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98539585,0.0059227664,0.0026477012,0.0016626031,0.0011008342,0.0032701793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013984737,0.0004236979,0.00047083112,0.001659222,0.025479725,0.011017638,0.0018907477,0.005348918,0.0059966706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023654794,0.00039621675,0.00053054444,0.00070230354,0.045084193,0.012824183,0.018344084,0.0062493565,0.0011968275],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048192658,0.00013799142,0.007587043,0.00009847348,0.000011351454,0.002693407,0.46103075,0.0002949364,0.0007081012,0.4939673,0.006687259,0.026735187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044224496,0.00014161397,0.0043230453,0.00050788885,0.00002681305,0.0051762583,0.55888593,0.0023847092,0.0011188275,0.2834248,0.14389151,0.00007439069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047437767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006253186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025479725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006456395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010425376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07395923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385249952","doi":"10.57054/jhea.v9i1-2.1356","title":"JHEA, Volume 9, n°1 &amp; 2, 2011 - Full Issue","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Higher Education in Africa","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Danish International Development Agency; Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid; Carnegie Corporation of New York; Ministère des Affaires Etrangères; United Nations Development Programme; United States Agency for International Development; International Development Research Centre; Canadian International Development Agency; Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa; African Capacity Building Foundation; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete; UNICEF; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation","keywords":"Academic freedom; Higher education; Political science; Feminism; Excellence; Democracy; Gender studies; Politics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.08798061666294507,"score_gpt":0.39135378442527424,"score_spread":0.30337316776232914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385249952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010312443,0.017186726,0.000615982,0.013771708,0.043517902,0.00024274093,0.003653994,0.0005293573,0.9194502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003310879,0.007311498,0.00032735887,0.0024322886,0.0032415176,0.00006473382,0.0012333005,0.0002534714,0.98182493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875295,0.00017003523,0.00007868474,0.00016524398,0.0006362135,0.00019680819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769956,0.00044979376,0.000096907774,0.00032053047,0.001004966,0.00042817375],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018035226,0.0007481602,0.000543516,0.0025078286,0.002854541,0.009408096,0.0012979772,0.0020580492,0.4994186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00576517,0.0005090776,0.00059538236,0.0033872102,0.0012403033,0.005039445,0.0032061387,0.0021592644,0.24454187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023928185,0.000033617147,0.0002483175,0.00037854796,0.0000038624466,0.00003334167,0.00016360496,0.0000346446,0.00018873208,0.0062373546,0.94647396,0.046180084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019847873,0.000005792027,0.0005598075,0.00022947653,0.0000014936863,0.000019422807,0.00013127767,0.000009133227,0.000085862775,0.00039547437,0.9985567,0.000003523507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012644228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01738867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5005814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031391077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066990196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7140186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385360758","doi":"10.59962/9780774866675-004","title":"Inquiries in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.032623502493111085,"score_gpt":0.23388784273457197,"score_spread":0.2012643402414609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385360758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008314454,0.014622522,0.00021329278,0.048303593,0.0030474951,0.0000744368,0.0011615548,0.00007433556,0.9241883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046035353,0.0049750786,0.00022510688,0.014784363,0.00024173025,0.000037696776,0.0002608304,0.000084696025,0.9333551],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967842,0.00025013305,0.00008251171,0.00031630395,0.0011706569,0.0013962561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970285,0.0004012378,0.000064049054,0.000116038245,0.0016728498,0.0007172702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016290218,0.0005351382,0.00072183175,0.0028631114,0.030245213,0.012462921,0.0019118404,0.005211585,0.07741725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066397856,0.000596154,0.0005880438,0.0055544614,0.0053096735,0.0026202195,0.0034786025,0.0066108447,0.0069440682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035544363,0.000028377168,0.0012061526,0.00009524783,0.000009333073,0.00038853168,0.00555541,0.00008878777,0.00009089747,0.19735888,0.7721193,0.023023581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057692873,0.000002963341,0.0013260253,0.000098184435,0.0000053686617,0.000040656145,0.0039519323,0.00003512746,0.00004339119,0.0024055592,0.99207,0.000015016516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99018127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09152957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09152957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16877559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6640966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511075","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3634","title":"Law and Technology in Legal Education: A Systemic Approach at Ryerson","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Legal practice; Practice of law; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Legal profession; Engineering","score_opus":0.024208621140504222,"score_gpt":0.3308094938504581,"score_spread":0.3066008727099539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511075","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116061375,0.010414294,0.03376198,0.4997421,0.00043480014,0.0001350878,0.000040018153,0.00024238406,0.33916798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.853692,0.007853628,0.020305434,0.018466389,0.00018578272,0.00016082248,0.000025386573,0.00008668155,0.09922376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900119,0.0068445466,0.00022602518,0.0008077797,0.001163219,0.0009466246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99269533,0.0036563613,0.0004693645,0.00044906785,0.00086038513,0.0018695384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009399723,0.00022761342,0.000523349,0.001554128,0.010756503,0.01625249,0.0012015725,0.0041339896,0.007019838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056868265,0.0006136014,0.0003053271,0.00078967895,0.02069084,0.0066338535,0.009113078,0.0073545864,0.0007941444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013137822,0.00022197221,0.0019040642,0.00018387302,0.000008778911,0.0005389688,0.05095759,0.0006804837,0.0010867495,0.85982543,0.028001899,0.056577105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000253548,0.00025772004,0.0057987818,0.0011542712,0.000025667747,0.00072498905,0.07571257,0.0030158197,0.0029839138,0.23385243,0.6763635,0.00008503667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027536279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049623877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9724637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017022364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029980274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12350649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511513","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1420","title":"Seven Out of Nine Legal Experts Agree: Expertise No Longer Matters (in the Same Way) After Vavilov!","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Confusion; Deference; Certainty; Political science; Focus (optics); Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.05062344579733579,"score_gpt":0.3702091998426819,"score_spread":0.3195857540453461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511513","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005183063,0.0032468825,0.0042756987,0.96155185,0.009327966,0.000031640342,0.0001309155,0.00015436375,0.016097594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.112066634,0.002606951,0.0047979285,0.834051,0.0028454033,0.000076069635,0.00020574384,0.00015190072,0.04319831],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909213,0.001815222,0.0007719893,0.0021662354,0.0031355012,0.001189841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703427,0.010957967,0.0013795143,0.0015574462,0.011570421,0.004191912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012461602,0.0005242717,0.0007523065,0.0012168376,0.008237278,0.0064605386,0.0017788471,0.012846114,0.011355872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055785555,0.00040942983,0.00085288804,0.00082181767,0.0060753045,0.0070053376,0.0045674187,0.021301717,0.0041479785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082162675,0.000041315798,0.0044373623,0.00019463424,0.000060137983,0.0004093964,0.0064729694,0.0001215166,0.00090490846,0.078514405,0.8694843,0.03927693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024941803,0.000047034067,0.0042624236,0.00052937353,0.00006222272,0.00077725056,0.018743405,0.00048502174,0.0017076657,0.051203914,0.92197216,0.00018454647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012814625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02667718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012846114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038904813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007952299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06590402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511835","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1379","title":"ACCLE and Bill C-75: Implications for Student Legal Clinics &amp; Communities in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16372624617413442,"score_gpt":0.47797874237364124,"score_spread":0.3142524961995068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016373232,0.002541611,0.00055376516,0.92918336,0.0025746713,0.00021217573,0.0007794221,0.00010459449,0.047677245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2001718,0.0043477523,0.0040255524,0.7064436,0.0012362151,0.00030181755,0.0007398485,0.00010955789,0.08262388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761499,0.0021553342,0.0006511423,0.0013104606,0.0081282575,0.011604747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9333624,0.00693571,0.0015693827,0.000845031,0.019918151,0.03736921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011580468,0.0006314273,0.00058387336,0.0018588966,0.03011608,0.01185997,0.00710188,0.020449089,0.020857742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035539705,0.00083666376,0.0016454511,0.002662048,0.009533794,0.0034712497,0.0075289872,0.013227626,0.0014278861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014375479,0.00034156383,0.021215996,0.00037007465,0.000043212644,0.0023109051,0.0073953047,0.0015321668,0.00057133357,0.1404696,0.75958556,0.06602059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002816475,0.00025122327,0.064344145,0.0021608071,0.00009949391,0.00062841317,0.033389654,0.0022245701,0.00039820155,0.018209362,0.87764746,0.00036509626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18072109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18072109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5875546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9502474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512565","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1312","title":"Learning, Teaching &amp; Practising Systemic Advocacy in Legal Clinics: A Conversation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Conversation; Windsor; Public relations; Legal education; Political science; Medicine; Systemic therapy; Medical education; Sociology; Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.0518633316414894,"score_gpt":0.45091875470452697,"score_spread":0.39905542306303754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512565","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057600867,0.0015960159,0.00593243,0.8885341,0.0014668398,0.000095663,0.000017812927,0.00006350271,0.044692658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8716409,0.0025871762,0.004871807,0.10775963,0.00076852844,0.00018890461,0.000010908437,0.00007211973,0.012099952],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9460952,0.044744164,0.0006801511,0.0013864896,0.0025707807,0.0045232084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599039,0.026017526,0.0019844838,0.00063144736,0.0021243999,0.009338285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04360287,0.0005326376,0.0005769713,0.0012311238,0.0459427,0.02616694,0.0033249413,0.016937962,0.0047218236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03354202,0.00076056336,0.0005163791,0.0013272996,0.071046345,0.020250585,0.017081643,0.02929948,0.00085319567],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139766225,0.00012975451,0.0013454917,0.00011549325,0.000005590188,0.00085345004,0.8360997,0.00013196349,0.00040192375,0.118536994,0.026944043,0.015421558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000113322,0.000046064808,0.00045114834,0.00029321274,0.0000038436483,0.00032504665,0.84012324,0.00035190798,0.00019405775,0.017298708,0.14086434,0.000037162914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040526655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060843747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0459427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023503138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04157875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23059678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518138","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3044","title":"Why I Don’t Teach Administrative Law (And Perhaps Why I Should?)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Doctrine; Relevance (law); Law; Administrative law; Political science; Plan (archaeology); Legal doctrine; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09071016286316566,"score_gpt":0.39322226997316284,"score_spread":0.3025121071099972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010840902,0.001479785,0.00078263826,0.98109585,0.005181514,0.000005393037,0.000007557905,0.000023624523,0.010339514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07210723,0.0029169514,0.0015348241,0.892183,0.0070281937,0.00006362088,0.000020114769,0.00011377744,0.024032233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866137,0.0062109563,0.00035868233,0.0011296428,0.0034937032,0.002193266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97263294,0.013930913,0.0021971262,0.00061926,0.0068142745,0.0038054935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012926549,0.0003060525,0.00048596118,0.00058652466,0.009152098,0.008001575,0.002421378,0.013372664,0.0073983455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0511847,0.00037593054,0.0005571975,0.000480373,0.019798655,0.010818352,0.0030051756,0.02455094,0.0035550857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014898769,0.000062595536,0.000990357,0.00021854448,0.000008590457,0.00018163021,0.0125985565,0.00011422483,0.0002195767,0.23218526,0.73329157,0.020114155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021137344,0.00004087703,0.0013920103,0.0009594886,0.000010167772,0.00023393349,0.02105261,0.00021758198,0.00038970163,0.07657948,0.8990594,0.000043669468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017849825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032648195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017849825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007645313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01355831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06836295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518156","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1189","title":"The E-Team Project: A Teamwork Approach to Clinical Legal Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Notice; Legal education; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Public relations; Passion; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Law; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07516484529182203,"score_gpt":0.4836582694816039,"score_spread":0.40849342418978185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518156","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11042455,0.0016741557,0.5280631,0.06808098,0.0027585335,0.003868284,0.00015191842,0.0016487829,0.2833297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57909507,0.0015945811,0.36175278,0.006019318,0.00048215594,0.002738804,0.0001797632,0.0002970125,0.047840618],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794136,0.016701387,0.00034951032,0.00097250595,0.0011557668,0.0014071411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98044395,0.0076810997,0.0007198981,0.0012702795,0.0010220795,0.008862735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0144240465,0.0006298057,0.00035148568,0.0023349405,0.010071762,0.008198523,0.0038569514,0.003110825,0.013165034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013005621,0.00049157866,0.0006128051,0.0015507755,0.013024204,0.005097956,0.014544502,0.0041663866,0.0025963788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017070519,0.0033673847,0.007736388,0.00083237333,0.00006710212,0.0026215443,0.17532228,0.0038882738,0.0015661743,0.17092444,0.11649704,0.5170062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040074746,0.0013197133,0.0069960793,0.0012610639,0.000030829564,0.0018674759,0.21595274,0.0059504085,0.0014203546,0.1537199,0.61094266,0.00013809408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055587906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018818935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144240465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045654853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019967439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07628256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518234","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1207","title":"Sustainable Professionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Public discourse; Sociology; Narrative; Economic Justice; Environmental ethics; Political science; Civil discourse; Space (punctuation); Civil society; Public relations; Law; Discourse analysis; Politics","score_opus":0.0870535766235191,"score_gpt":0.40013027130761586,"score_spread":0.31307669468409677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012059569,0.0026620661,0.034694187,0.18093666,0.0010101919,0.00008708187,0.00003725545,0.0001345173,0.76837844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7725952,0.003983333,0.019264676,0.03805549,0.0011943441,0.00031776272,0.000093670795,0.00023180648,0.16426368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98038954,0.008615053,0.00041113677,0.0023649454,0.006201004,0.0020183763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917024,0.0027382858,0.0006568452,0.0013664721,0.001700529,0.001835611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015129606,0.00053011527,0.0004695497,0.00146727,0.009432667,0.010117533,0.0017244763,0.0068841456,0.011184505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013280448,0.00034263494,0.000608509,0.0007960121,0.033545643,0.010007399,0.013968938,0.0070522632,0.003753792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035302414,0.000025609617,0.00014442118,0.000035585967,0.0000027113078,0.00003966102,0.0046432572,0.00014003454,0.00010088013,0.97171515,0.012637159,0.010512057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006871662,0.000019752759,0.00013876936,0.00013479394,0.0000025037295,0.00010022931,0.0035092884,0.0003362486,0.00018262246,0.59975654,0.3958044,0.00000796256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020098514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028183989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015129606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007213991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016813442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08001399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518247","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3148","title":"The Wellness Doctrines for Law Students &amp; Young Lawyers, by Jerome Doraisamy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Mental health law; Commission; Mental illness; Psychology; Subject (documents); Law; Population; Addiction; Sociology; Criminology; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.05786228101600488,"score_gpt":0.4381310824051654,"score_spread":0.3802688013891605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010135242,0.026515925,0.00019106535,0.95238197,0.0056957947,0.00000736276,0.000027282813,0.000010646733,0.014156366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.069917984,0.04951308,0.0010275607,0.76286465,0.008938438,0.000065254244,0.00006161026,0.000081432256,0.10753002],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618524,0.00095028454,0.00014361326,0.00039948936,0.0016630079,0.00065840734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99170625,0.0028957117,0.0003628399,0.00025269145,0.0019960173,0.0027864976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005344647,0.0004556602,0.00042497896,0.0008326636,0.011922918,0.0070740934,0.0011219281,0.0069091404,0.003798145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014654067,0.0005438052,0.00034347727,0.0005708427,0.02037613,0.008139609,0.004086486,0.021727704,0.0012653405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107086325,0.000028906004,0.00073730736,0.00003660779,0.000003424291,0.00013439651,0.0054249675,0.000030424153,0.00007200274,0.07302506,0.90081507,0.019681059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061884125,0.000006779428,0.0011765892,0.0002894021,0.000002700183,0.0001542976,0.0049377843,0.000039372553,0.00005072313,0.016458377,0.9768595,0.000018263288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26813623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43777364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26813623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013206034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038781993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53315103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385524317","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1309","title":"Without Harry","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.029278452808887016,"score_gpt":0.3582747788596724,"score_spread":0.3289963260507854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385524317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008756953,0.0066243573,0.006291837,0.14714766,0.0048030843,0.00013552871,0.0008338274,0.00043369847,0.8249731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1354926,0.0014571373,0.0020030232,0.25913587,0.0015982414,0.00025580323,0.00019179746,0.00016213529,0.5997034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954152,0.0007401026,0.0001248473,0.00068087684,0.0016107355,0.0014282785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966888,0.001410762,0.00022277114,0.00031587004,0.0010997583,0.00026208308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019743352,0.0006531495,0.00046992028,0.0009941014,0.00992318,0.0060820086,0.0016827944,0.015133322,0.027238095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01205237,0.0007674032,0.0011814316,0.00058452704,0.0046359077,0.0059446916,0.0045937547,0.01115049,0.0104341805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025959887,0.000057935304,0.001304828,0.00007409148,0.000012032331,0.00043609025,0.0025915115,0.000101008016,0.00049596466,0.25579464,0.7225889,0.016517075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015592406,0.000057597874,0.0030214929,0.00022654052,0.000018219134,0.00024986663,0.0036276935,0.0002377584,0.0009727613,0.034230985,0.9572793,0.000062231724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055739846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085670106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055739846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026536363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047807638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11083084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385533046","doi":"10.1515/9780773548916-015","title":"The State of Legal Scholarship and Graduate Legal Education in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal education; State (computer science); Political science; Graduate education; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.03884186204485448,"score_gpt":0.2882838910222357,"score_spread":0.24944202897738124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385533046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044323586,0.07616987,0.0010994878,0.15683334,0.001846263,0.00008775965,0.0006722207,0.00019368228,0.71877384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5519677,0.040306073,0.0018939069,0.013504552,0.0005260548,0.00006528214,0.00033996123,0.00015902738,0.3912374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930294,0.0004903497,0.00013036327,0.00039752395,0.0030894885,0.002862937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99228865,0.0015980055,0.00024410376,0.00020312262,0.0031373135,0.0025288],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028180196,0.00047894372,0.00083016296,0.0040835547,0.024430657,0.021984119,0.0028559528,0.006032887,0.01495073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010247335,0.0007761321,0.0005241568,0.010429562,0.014839608,0.0038741434,0.004469884,0.00814287,0.0009354005],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024440727,0.000039676324,0.0018407494,0.00015566015,0.00001123784,0.00016884039,0.009593507,0.00048234122,0.00010904628,0.7935641,0.120115995,0.07389444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021931914,0.000021839202,0.010348537,0.0007964938,0.000020491587,0.00009457808,0.012952825,0.0012401758,0.00019191345,0.05232657,0.9218988,0.00008590934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99870586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99718195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32254428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5523601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78575265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385533651","doi":"10.1515/9780773586833","title":"Rethinking Professionalism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.06771102656340179,"score_gpt":0.319979836379472,"score_spread":0.25226880981607025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385533651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07600291,0.012457146,0.004088237,0.18452926,0.002788361,0.00006482873,0.00013131784,0.00014761306,0.71979034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86218727,0.0049523707,0.0011653482,0.015257504,0.00061180623,0.00004459083,0.000047579902,0.00023703104,0.11549642],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867747,0.004454482,0.0002405637,0.0014116261,0.003906748,0.0032119793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890855,0.0045156237,0.00048668557,0.00094338995,0.003195111,0.0017737247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009086527,0.00065159326,0.00051082316,0.003036273,0.052167375,0.021966437,0.0027109822,0.004637162,0.006471432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012506731,0.00042478176,0.00035786763,0.0028530497,0.11282695,0.0092918705,0.011064723,0.008212905,0.0007868422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012621043,0.0000075877597,0.0007483336,0.00007134485,0.00000342919,0.0002806303,0.518749,0.000076077835,0.00022133485,0.42930934,0.033544343,0.016975973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033955137,0.000009221886,0.0009434538,0.00028686994,0.0000065039076,0.00017915656,0.21978165,0.00011009688,0.00031352168,0.030621627,0.7477224,0.000022189304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8596934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8978398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8596934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13140887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11127473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9534426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385586256","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-31278-6_8","title":"Professionalism in Everyday Work: Women Lawyers’ Strategies to Exercise Control over Their Work in Finland, French Canada, and Poland","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Disadvantaged; Work (physics); Legal profession; Control (management); Public relations; Professional development; Political science; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.038542359201762355,"score_gpt":0.3183333260823779,"score_spread":0.27979096688061555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385586256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6917503,0.005721863,0.0008406092,0.022142313,0.00020478276,0.00006288494,0.00006744703,0.0000287276,0.2791811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95400774,0.0007532667,0.00020887976,0.0006531562,0.000019637666,0.0000195529,0.00002295265,0.000018409251,0.044296257],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957825,0.0013584826,0.000078355464,0.00036386566,0.00061026233,0.001806567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969753,0.0014407636,0.00023171547,0.000082539336,0.00028789864,0.0009817913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028696163,0.0003021121,0.0003362877,0.0018372622,0.024671433,0.012052127,0.0017571569,0.002164007,0.0062256455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048540486,0.00032324475,0.00026548255,0.0021440797,0.018796124,0.0033346764,0.0051502157,0.0035472228,0.0004950537],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035384444,0.000051402818,0.0054042717,0.000045356082,0.0000052529463,0.0004027774,0.9277612,0.000050715367,0.00014047744,0.03555946,0.0064136502,0.024130004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011662845,0.00002432123,0.020235892,0.00018362909,0.000008038469,0.00022815293,0.860792,0.000091306225,0.00014809343,0.0031865204,0.11507189,0.00001860354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45727175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6765026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54272825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035616122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034803037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9092203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385591175","doi":"10.59962/9780774861892-005","title":"Alberta: Plain, Old-Fashioned, Unfrilled Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.032200660299788894,"score_gpt":0.24673182414817774,"score_spread":0.21453116384838883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385591175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028944765,0.012339718,0.00036161032,0.008831916,0.0012387227,0.000019443161,0.00037508353,0.00015603178,0.973783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020248935,0.0025054375,0.00029114177,0.0014021196,0.000070641465,0.000007332305,0.00011970356,0.00005953438,0.9752951],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937445,0.0000416058,0.000010032353,0.00006903028,0.00030351608,0.00020133599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970394,0.00004225445,0.000008757384,0.000023430253,0.00014054574,0.00008118439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004453133,0.00054989674,0.0002972171,0.0015937855,0.009150454,0.010074367,0.0012175484,0.0030648136,0.059511367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009688137,0.00048997457,0.00018855584,0.0026949202,0.004654821,0.0017694228,0.0016392337,0.004355915,0.006456096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002291721,0.000018656434,0.00046669648,0.00007594839,0.0000045037104,0.0002819639,0.0035003591,0.00020847488,0.0002241264,0.2641405,0.66272503,0.06833076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029488776,0.0000022866334,0.001042942,0.00008564937,0.0000027899316,0.00005303221,0.0018464238,0.00006160962,0.00008499906,0.0063009155,0.9905069,0.000009530384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.960623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99177694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059511367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037003934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05078341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26848358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385592032","doi":"10.59962/9780774861120","title":"Seeking the Court’s Advice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Law; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.025893800936656552,"score_gpt":0.25258759916188706,"score_spread":0.2266937982252305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385592032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002820843,0.0023977687,0.0020931049,0.09890845,0.0028085634,0.00003885132,0.000097858116,0.00009790759,0.8907366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0909646,0.0034574422,0.0026691423,0.0632317,0.0013972848,0.000053906973,0.00014830788,0.0002457323,0.83783185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542445,0.0008921526,0.0001911365,0.00047142777,0.002151424,0.00086945324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952662,0.0019327962,0.000114114555,0.00037858973,0.0018444752,0.00046388432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036356032,0.00029901878,0.0004098012,0.0015144214,0.010342809,0.008542638,0.0013558962,0.007305309,0.041610982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018612105,0.00025491428,0.00049194385,0.0012195783,0.005429052,0.0060259122,0.0030499455,0.007911681,0.012993195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005129878,0.000009800497,0.0001955538,0.000024764926,0.0000027004623,0.00040703584,0.0023677645,0.00007601642,0.00011897179,0.5709887,0.3989595,0.026844027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018514706,0.000003150464,0.00012527344,0.00010914692,0.0000021685287,0.00016628271,0.001582464,0.00008590602,0.00009308403,0.02947985,0.96834296,0.000007873415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040102098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08372963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041610982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009489997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015521547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1392026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385594888","doi":"10.59962/9780774834902-010","title":"Shifting Terrains: A Picture of the Institutionalization of Equity in Canadian Universities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Equity (law); Terrain; Political science; Regional science; Sociology; Geography; Cartography; Law","score_opus":0.0485512270259994,"score_gpt":0.2925112259701792,"score_spread":0.2439599989441798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385594888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088268206,0.01015389,0.0024533544,0.050800048,0.0001894477,0.000070594775,0.00029052037,0.00007393015,0.84769994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94675916,0.00471722,0.0012083467,0.002149807,0.000057329282,0.000032828633,0.00008178012,0.000062799576,0.044930827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934953,0.00085476827,0.000081970655,0.00037042273,0.0018171577,0.0033804064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966577,0.0007234796,0.00016765916,0.00023210891,0.0011070572,0.001111935],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031144696,0.00049637724,0.0006261437,0.005147805,0.033419956,0.026678747,0.0030416963,0.0041831494,0.010955072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072650197,0.0005014184,0.0005262734,0.01289807,0.043009993,0.006460101,0.005833204,0.005909724,0.0004023412],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011517582,0.000009201947,0.0009554237,0.00002470529,0.0000040878203,0.000072927956,0.023636516,0.00047609024,0.00008163082,0.9520204,0.008665388,0.0140420515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028413904,0.000021603919,0.025281575,0.0006644237,0.00004216784,0.000121167635,0.120327264,0.0018944591,0.00024932457,0.36582896,0.48539433,0.00014639027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24261843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32314393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8784553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598363","doi":"10.59962/9780774863599-007","title":"Measuring Justice System Performance in Quebec and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.035033551832537146,"score_gpt":0.2072824535005228,"score_spread":0.17224890166798565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52861536,0.028050847,0.0027311917,0.022361074,0.00041710108,0.00031844835,0.022480568,0.0003534278,0.39467195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89110523,0.0070085796,0.0036696002,0.0013328483,0.000053306816,0.000114772054,0.0045905192,0.00012763005,0.09199756],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705267,0.00043751317,0.000112016554,0.00022543273,0.0014931966,0.000679165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99410313,0.00087877456,0.00028698493,0.00012267809,0.0038885477,0.000719892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022958522,0.0004907154,0.00042472928,0.0052209427,0.0060943584,0.0051871627,0.0017736253,0.00095880823,0.0051421695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074931667,0.0003484989,0.00031283527,0.014298578,0.0015265661,0.001321101,0.0009743562,0.0011361277,0.0005072158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013460002,0.00021746465,0.25619042,0.00043921126,0.00017133383,0.00039402835,0.015030713,0.007933743,0.00084192195,0.047505252,0.27799383,0.39314747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019226938,0.000044028195,0.8299178,0.000588699,0.00006831314,0.00007677957,0.0153341545,0.003273688,0.00063289294,0.0012747158,0.14867559,0.000094085226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12775202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12775202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12075027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9269101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598393","doi":"10.59962/9780774863599-014","title":"Court-Ordered Family Legal Information Sessions in Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.03549427290238069,"score_gpt":0.23844958392021842,"score_spread":0.20295531101783773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09339497,0.004715332,0.00025473346,0.029894646,0.0005877152,0.00017272674,0.0018865068,0.000106379055,0.8689871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.110378124,0.0013176656,0.00021173936,0.001101052,0.00004152637,0.0000402989,0.0002266004,0.000045692563,0.88663733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884987,0.00015289447,0.000027558706,0.00007965422,0.000380585,0.0005094733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973341,0.0005550015,0.000095186595,0.00006549639,0.00054569886,0.0014044043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009775148,0.00021925927,0.00023666683,0.0010331608,0.022119489,0.0035072998,0.0013183182,0.0020963587,0.091150515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031472852,0.000679283,0.00021557377,0.00266785,0.0024837058,0.0013776787,0.0020360402,0.0018449173,0.0045892126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016966046,0.00015692376,0.009225719,0.00017509148,0.000008890225,0.0018432039,0.06508898,0.00029211695,0.00073181815,0.056963023,0.78251874,0.082825884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016941895,0.000017101594,0.029810136,0.00012378741,0.000005829311,0.000100550766,0.023483623,0.0001621796,0.00019198112,0.0009973901,0.9450693,0.000021198503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97938836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091150515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08073036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12663361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5857425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598830","doi":"10.59962/9780774861076-009","title":"The Ontario Court of Appeal Decision","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027651252185599152,"score_gpt":0.24680505262696834,"score_spread":0.21915380044136917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008248675,0.0023431275,0.00027480337,0.120680094,0.0020033098,0.0002238021,0.0011214025,0.00006745993,0.86503726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049629193,0.0011692456,0.00032170158,0.06903609,0.0004985518,0.00018472932,0.00022208208,0.00008084338,0.8788575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905129,0.0005992054,0.00022715177,0.0007537641,0.0043869102,0.0035200517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99409723,0.001473528,0.00012648551,0.00028663175,0.002835766,0.0011803844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037297672,0.0007933952,0.0010739419,0.0026139526,0.03869382,0.01715535,0.0030935365,0.025891505,0.056931753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014108207,0.0015937346,0.0014005083,0.0028513353,0.0062193736,0.0031618027,0.0033114827,0.014473745,0.0069346405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007220898,0.00003711106,0.001304075,0.000059962076,0.000031433843,0.0005551468,0.0016733193,0.00015008535,0.00015798972,0.22550324,0.7633193,0.0071362075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006044486,0.00000998958,0.0037873348,0.0001838037,0.00006227657,0.0000795576,0.0022603467,0.0002801691,0.00021151602,0.013284276,0.9797053,0.00007491449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9695635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99152726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11528661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11528661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17098212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8364668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599910","doi":"10.59962/9780774833110-007","title":"Common Law Legal Education in the Dominion of Canada’s Moral Project","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Law; Moral education; Legal education; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.030166965977069138,"score_gpt":0.265105086298473,"score_spread":0.23493812032140388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050991133,0.016329227,0.0016398829,0.12688038,0.00095821655,0.00007584119,0.00013988989,0.0000903539,0.8028951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5686609,0.004911294,0.0011370418,0.012575214,0.0001116282,0.000042732714,0.00006385217,0.000082152,0.41241506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960646,0.00065632066,0.000046487607,0.00020118368,0.0011233968,0.0019079122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99591064,0.0011749312,0.000091992704,0.000116151576,0.0010076707,0.0016985942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029590519,0.00040099525,0.000374416,0.0016234012,0.033893105,0.01279456,0.0016841976,0.0065835784,0.012324683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00618082,0.00041507176,0.00026326466,0.0025129905,0.018487712,0.0031856056,0.0038717845,0.00887341,0.00071674277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018293344,0.00005443527,0.0012402586,0.00005995731,0.0000064416486,0.00032895675,0.03299447,0.00039342217,0.00013019284,0.72793704,0.17865878,0.05817779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011272997,0.0000106534935,0.0035385059,0.00030726334,0.000007767651,0.00008497947,0.025214233,0.00033078672,0.00018244778,0.033831473,0.93645096,0.000029697501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8577863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14221369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34098825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99491054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599962","doi":"10.59962/9780774833110-001","title":"Foreword","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03502917364281081,"score_gpt":0.25243146816263545,"score_spread":0.21740229451982465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044753184,0.0052444395,0.0016004387,0.027525073,0.078219295,0.00024008768,0.0019704027,0.0009936374,0.88375914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022140334,0.0015993314,0.0004862528,0.0065838173,0.0069868085,0.000095132564,0.0011982102,0.000484507,0.980352],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908257,0.00012401427,0.00005390447,0.00017949917,0.00045001667,0.00011000298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978542,0.00029554695,0.000082999846,0.00018599605,0.0012664458,0.00031477408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064893457,0.00088560104,0.0007347147,0.0015856465,0.0029217477,0.0049933596,0.0014590257,0.0023307553,0.5841968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047983835,0.00034816517,0.00060603005,0.0012965859,0.00080931233,0.003775342,0.002610247,0.0037981486,0.5230841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010253194,0.000009578178,0.000030037025,0.000055191827,9.842095e-7,0.000031696844,0.000054845008,0.000013187529,0.00006277232,0.0043415367,0.9720191,0.023370912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013636152,0.0000041671265,0.000054487806,0.000041690368,4.6682536e-7,0.000026444668,0.00006755247,0.000008385745,0.000024207866,0.000707297,0.999062,0.0000018634641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002723928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004095026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5841968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018694148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018105858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385600957","doi":"10.59962/9780774831000","title":"In Search of the Ethical Lawyer","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.038265278247526534,"score_gpt":0.2927296270317376,"score_spread":0.2544643487842111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385600957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039926246,0.015707461,0.0036315147,0.27771285,0.003168495,0.000040920437,0.000028773527,0.00007452233,0.6956429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17283924,0.010228019,0.0044156816,0.056728467,0.0014090248,0.00007618169,0.00004870628,0.00014892085,0.7541058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976285,0.00095220597,0.000047017875,0.00021312959,0.0007795169,0.0003796809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778324,0.001067372,0.000117907344,0.0001494223,0.00044918418,0.00043300446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023195436,0.00032858958,0.0002874205,0.0006034045,0.010876638,0.010747505,0.00080634863,0.004969504,0.00871192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006583423,0.00026690608,0.00017163127,0.00055261457,0.023466215,0.007582715,0.0030602685,0.010839657,0.0025651995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043405857,0.000013571791,0.00016023697,0.00004616488,0.000001584951,0.00013890081,0.020229617,0.000057800236,0.0001513176,0.78204626,0.17755267,0.019597465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000343965,0.000004817716,0.00013797844,0.00020832631,0.0000018550337,0.00014165074,0.013177828,0.000078946825,0.00009414707,0.07696045,0.909184,0.000006451719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04851322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12964821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04851322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010758614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017247714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09646171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385658726","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2023.12.09","title":"Stimulating Career Development: Assessment of the Effects of Guest Speaker Learning Experiences on Students Enrolled in Criminal Justice College Courses","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Psychology; Economic Justice; Intervention (counseling); Agreeableness; Medical education; Political science; Social psychology; Personality; Medicine; Criminology; Big Five personality traits; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.09665481280319241,"score_gpt":0.4613833580445222,"score_spread":0.3647285452413298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385658726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999121,0.000034059667,0.0000241607,0.00009222274,0.000017622231,0.00003741151,0.000007726408,0.0000050171125,0.00066079275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982475,0.0001433424,0.00035540774,0.00011489745,0.000023343344,0.000085223706,0.000029187699,0.0000025990805,0.0009985487],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988427,0.00040383008,0.00004881535,0.000094336654,0.00023887269,0.00037146147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925471,0.0013148396,0.0010625006,0.00025452077,0.0005306042,0.004290494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016973158,0.00045370593,0.00043249893,0.00040567838,0.0015862535,0.0013348559,0.0007170662,0.000679372,0.0031546436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008302474,0.00027124924,0.0005314957,0.0002072498,0.00072219636,0.0004138562,0.0019083885,0.001451614,0.0005013052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057366244,0.13250351,0.36573765,0.00071560213,0.00032327374,0.0010300082,0.05588534,0.00042132178,0.019390719,0.0005220425,0.004800661,0.41293323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056343275,0.045734517,0.8710626,0.00018810516,0.000165959,0.00027730793,0.06837126,0.00053577794,0.0053556343,0.00039847128,0.0072723827,0.00007450976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013460328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042163385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031546436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050635496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019511126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0105533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385705022","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-27654-5_6","title":"Lessons from Online Pandemic Pedagogy in North American Law Schools: Toward Law Student Wellbeing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Competence (human resources); Pedagogy; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Sociology; Legal education; Political science; Public relations; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.13973545031539022,"score_gpt":0.4711887448770878,"score_spread":0.3314532945616976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385705022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25793996,0.0098409,0.0045226403,0.22940053,0.004110205,0.0002245649,0.00008631424,0.00021312108,0.49366185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7359641,0.012889523,0.00855945,0.025868518,0.00073827495,0.00040270176,0.00011782618,0.00019873775,0.21526082],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981993,0.0011284971,0.000028462891,0.00008845898,0.00024885143,0.00030652684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978497,0.00078615296,0.00008199339,0.00006564133,0.0003002711,0.0009163626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033963847,0.00041742658,0.00028783703,0.0006874979,0.009134666,0.0055137277,0.0012334331,0.0023541276,0.007745196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036063076,0.00022463601,0.00031659412,0.0008585655,0.0040212004,0.004958009,0.006736175,0.0056018117,0.0013061229],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035927435,0.0020357508,0.005189353,0.0003918334,0.000009716355,0.0007104977,0.35347,0.00024098315,0.00072212296,0.06842566,0.23136435,0.3374038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020278943,0.00016197408,0.0090565,0.0011026049,0.000012398658,0.00023322087,0.4189677,0.00020406257,0.00066288357,0.026146928,0.5434054,0.000026077372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013789424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09982459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013789424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049622357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010412657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03600371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385721687","doi":"10.59962/9780774850049","title":"Gender in the Legal Profession","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04731256539124179,"score_gpt":0.29693324867239934,"score_spread":0.24962068328115755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385721687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15767425,0.033758618,0.0010933629,0.087314375,0.0023653333,0.000029823294,0.00008822506,0.000032690692,0.71764326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89045256,0.007348051,0.00029927085,0.009406339,0.0004406737,0.000022256449,0.00002194841,0.000036981353,0.09197194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99363303,0.0020258948,0.0000924089,0.00036256263,0.0012381378,0.002647957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995869,0.0011475862,0.0002634677,0.000101250786,0.00055878976,0.0020599263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003977201,0.00020734484,0.00036855135,0.0016084923,0.022295471,0.009394183,0.0008580777,0.0023417806,0.012380164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004894673,0.00019633086,0.00021995317,0.0016356948,0.032586813,0.0034137378,0.0040923217,0.0030444695,0.0011908414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006292103,0.00007437208,0.017771397,0.00010607262,0.0000065892555,0.00092019833,0.29462975,0.000077823475,0.00044317386,0.55342805,0.04967212,0.08280753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013784069,0.000045359186,0.031525638,0.0008015632,0.000007279714,0.0005154569,0.23135282,0.0000786957,0.00013826192,0.043152697,0.6923262,0.00004237613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45809844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6465862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45809844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019874519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02225294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.910864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385832446","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4517431","title":"A Study to Create Evidence-Based Proposals for Reform of Legal Education in India-Phase II","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Phase (matter); Legal education; Political science; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.058711190245633066,"score_gpt":0.460066782830266,"score_spread":0.40135559258463294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385832446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8844434,0.0024216466,0.0041718497,0.031621717,0.0005951804,0.04060429,0.001247858,0.000061517625,0.034832504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95699906,0.0008270497,0.013587293,0.011390032,0.00009598634,0.012966984,0.00038582325,0.0000134522015,0.0037342987],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9564664,0.030763406,0.003403838,0.0012716509,0.003456806,0.004637852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.811823,0.14305484,0.014719312,0.008080509,0.014542377,0.007779973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08544724,0.00040922596,0.0005939841,0.0033700846,0.0045036958,0.0063517983,0.0024101944,0.0045088124,0.006962783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11205074,0.0006995295,0.0008747606,0.0034562144,0.0034669985,0.0041764216,0.0063594654,0.004186039,0.00048300394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0077654417,0.023020763,0.15125138,0.023793573,0.00090281724,0.005269912,0.18244462,0.0042614215,0.007908559,0.21312344,0.03267843,0.34757966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01646351,0.02737571,0.24824037,0.019443024,0.0026287073,0.0010428635,0.42590752,0.004274568,0.015778096,0.023028122,0.21539733,0.00042021525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013101928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030449612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08544724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014406757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08794763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45189357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385853868","doi":"10.59962/9780774851060-004","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03771093803565562,"score_gpt":0.263362030160542,"score_spread":0.22565109212488638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385853868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034688995,0.0078352885,0.012959494,0.07573176,0.0668526,0.0012243451,0.04578344,0.0044489466,0.7816952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019656442,0.0035249286,0.010457099,0.031795174,0.003713609,0.0010505659,0.025917543,0.002344232,0.9015405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967624,0.00058727205,0.00018644323,0.0007542689,0.0013408918,0.000368734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99383426,0.00059335236,0.00018842757,0.0004851609,0.0036820606,0.0012167927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030298305,0.0010745191,0.0008297785,0.0015318262,0.0029670252,0.0042235903,0.0023752362,0.0024213642,0.5249358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01107521,0.000391863,0.0006453866,0.0010972631,0.0006189546,0.0021376722,0.0045752646,0.002956112,0.34835368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056897352,0.000017146065,0.0004321772,0.00020507333,0.00000552312,0.0001488034,0.00030027967,0.000047323298,0.0004684788,0.0053483136,0.95660096,0.03636898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007645719,0.00000724953,0.00026088653,0.00010443312,0.0000040655827,0.000110184024,0.00025798977,0.000030182648,0.0001445488,0.00093132746,0.9981363,0.0000052435475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060537676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010600463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47506422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026653998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058115255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6776214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385869327","doi":"10.59962/9780774855792-002","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.044179194890729995,"score_gpt":0.25793329924423847,"score_spread":0.21375410435350847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385869327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044166767,0.0076915524,0.015103067,0.073921114,0.049866308,0.0009885821,0.014399667,0.0027892594,0.8308237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011616752,0.002719745,0.009763859,0.010781952,0.0025721213,0.00040019638,0.0064893677,0.0014066816,0.9542494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671257,0.00059357984,0.00013375176,0.000460084,0.0018999111,0.00020005675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913703,0.0008640088,0.00024471027,0.0004752948,0.0056096264,0.0014359383],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00273899,0.00072562916,0.0007720676,0.0015295794,0.002410621,0.0032440384,0.0020003763,0.0012563852,0.26832825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011807772,0.00030798255,0.00047735602,0.0012794142,0.00070010003,0.002253086,0.0031583959,0.003017014,0.20323075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031058793,0.000015716041,0.00030409696,0.00012576043,0.0000031580155,0.00012849105,0.00081540446,0.000061817766,0.00029632458,0.010388087,0.94695324,0.040876932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026356163,0.0000040128143,0.00016238878,0.00007320539,0.0000017266045,0.00011384755,0.00028161152,0.000027479944,0.00007937917,0.0010183632,0.9982317,0.0000034766522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005573917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009991444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73167175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029486276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037517692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89764744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385869702","doi":"10.59962/9780774855983-002","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.044179194890729995,"score_gpt":0.25793329924423847,"score_spread":0.21375410435350847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385869702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030125128,0.009864737,0.014795616,0.16471773,0.1482206,0.00050850067,0.0100335665,0.003330956,0.64551586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0116408905,0.0026345497,0.0070346775,0.021190815,0.007386343,0.00032037968,0.0039110864,0.001501595,0.9443796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968766,0.00066989724,0.00012684375,0.0005460302,0.0015341635,0.0002464553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866715,0.0010165708,0.00042856738,0.0007872768,0.008325627,0.0027704202],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032270963,0.001104292,0.0006906468,0.001550604,0.0030521397,0.004229661,0.0017566251,0.0016079426,0.28525978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018341655,0.00032540137,0.00049775623,0.0011479099,0.0008235184,0.0036202439,0.00437074,0.0036119078,0.23924278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021642694,0.000010513039,0.0002595473,0.000064157415,0.000003400595,0.00006904413,0.00035227623,0.000025881232,0.00018360623,0.013101621,0.9572366,0.028671721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002519729,0.0000033333395,0.00014058323,0.00006381404,0.0000022544546,0.000075900105,0.0002285195,0.000022907227,0.00008245387,0.0017349394,0.9976388,0.000004132373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041759512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072495495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7147402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003118262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040132445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.954289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385870530","doi":"10.59962/9780774850896-002","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Donner Canadian Foundation","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06068863955259684,"score_gpt":0.28669161791566455,"score_spread":0.2260029783630677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385870530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00266661,0.0053357766,0.008193576,0.096666224,0.057973452,0.00032525297,0.0076646144,0.0019127742,0.8192616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008986754,0.001425066,0.0038009626,0.011936233,0.0025607876,0.00014478837,0.0023156719,0.0007730417,0.9680567],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983211,0.00030906065,0.00006210474,0.0003112465,0.00085841253,0.00013804775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99305636,0.00064974686,0.0002121441,0.00042788193,0.0042510275,0.0014028271],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020600148,0.00068289257,0.00048223956,0.0010099462,0.0026056601,0.0030523383,0.0011238588,0.0011748547,0.289813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010425429,0.000246534,0.00037767628,0.0007470104,0.0006055159,0.00215963,0.002795036,0.002982717,0.2179001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002375512,0.000010388479,0.00025074562,0.00006294364,0.0000020822422,0.00007714009,0.0005921574,0.000020713893,0.00022489835,0.011527668,0.94976926,0.037438236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014969984,0.0000021228054,0.0001190928,0.000038553862,0.0000012796229,0.00007393399,0.00018388721,0.000014647568,0.0000498886,0.00064156356,0.9988714,0.000002202173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004594513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010129407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71018696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020219686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027088432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9695211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385966807","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v16n4p1","title":"Right to Counsel during Detention for Duty Crimes in China –A Balanced View of Corruption Combating and Human Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Law; Statutory law; Human rights; Right to counsel; Political science; Language change; Intervention (counseling); Psychology","score_opus":0.03442167226949643,"score_gpt":0.3916593778950216,"score_spread":0.35723770562552515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385966807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91088593,0.0011121418,0.0013721532,0.022014193,0.000057651534,0.00006299384,0.000040777133,0.00001105813,0.06444313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592185,0.00018695039,0.00021701457,0.000629047,0.000015339368,0.000011537979,0.000006128896,0.0000011805012,0.0030109226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997021,0.0008156984,0.00014957268,0.0002447877,0.00068920787,0.001079708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793965,0.00036977994,0.0005047565,0.00012173975,0.00032003573,0.00074409187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027865309,0.00013186055,0.0001599072,0.0009788218,0.005325899,0.0036153449,0.00064177805,0.0012024472,0.002603834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030036117,0.00016800496,0.00016637493,0.00061715214,0.006716637,0.0016295586,0.002480602,0.0014099582,0.000089524176],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009729362,0.0002364013,0.20895213,0.00022506804,0.00004000034,0.0020721431,0.076681055,0.0013655507,0.0043956297,0.61865544,0.00651301,0.080766305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082138125,0.0003745984,0.644465,0.001291414,0.000117011776,0.0014195641,0.09552841,0.008126551,0.003951495,0.12026886,0.12416849,0.00020640288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07772232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14678168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07772232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007649836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021084871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15453982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386127164","doi":"10.32920/24030282","title":"Changing the Subject: Redefining Access to Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Milestone; Political science; Legal research; Legal realism; Subject (documents); Scholarship; Law; Economic Justice; Legal education; Variety (cybernetics); Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Empirical legal studies; Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Library science; Social science","score_opus":0.2705598342375855,"score_gpt":0.4897124995779677,"score_spread":0.2191526653403822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386127164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008619201,0.14563465,0.003961701,0.58796805,0.006259352,0.000064353946,0.00014387883,0.00014124377,0.24720752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66149163,0.12444168,0.004693707,0.13134773,0.008694914,0.00021052973,0.0001977048,0.00032304216,0.068599075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800771,0.009333133,0.00079413754,0.0011919149,0.005568794,0.0030350147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779912,0.011847875,0.0012790026,0.0017020499,0.004154231,0.0030257825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0168456,0.00033402786,0.000723799,0.003890862,0.009324991,0.023605442,0.0022739235,0.007896477,0.011408826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03894836,0.00034614716,0.0004824205,0.0034008198,0.051553782,0.025519032,0.013056971,0.0076369396,0.0011359861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011957232,0.000011193364,0.00046709817,0.0003516671,0.00000816949,0.00006706265,0.012266746,0.000057773363,0.000098260054,0.864068,0.07484598,0.047746126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011651331,0.000024636458,0.00191216,0.002056594,0.000021725473,0.00008252916,0.012459881,0.00011657839,0.00017866021,0.26581332,0.71729743,0.000024828145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09576184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16205473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09576184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027455352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048328985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19920343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386127225","doi":"10.32920/24030282.v1","title":"Changing the Subject: Redefining Access to Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Milestone; Legal profession; Legal research; Political science; Legal realism; Subject (documents); Scholarship; Law; Economic Justice; Variety (cybernetics); Legal education; Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Empirical legal studies; Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Library science; Social science","score_opus":0.2705598342375855,"score_gpt":0.4897124995779677,"score_spread":0.2191526653403822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386127225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008619201,0.14563465,0.003961701,0.58796805,0.006259352,0.000064353946,0.00014387883,0.00014124377,0.24720752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66149163,0.12444168,0.004693707,0.13134773,0.008694914,0.00021052973,0.0001977048,0.00032304216,0.068599075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800771,0.009333133,0.00079413754,0.0011919149,0.005568794,0.0030350147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779912,0.011847875,0.0012790026,0.0017020499,0.004154231,0.0030257825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0168456,0.00033402786,0.000723799,0.003890862,0.009324991,0.023605442,0.0022739235,0.007896477,0.011408826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03894836,0.00034614716,0.0004824205,0.0034008198,0.051553782,0.025519032,0.013056971,0.0076369396,0.0011359861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011957232,0.000011193364,0.00046709817,0.0003516671,0.00000816949,0.00006706265,0.012266746,0.000057773363,0.000098260054,0.864068,0.07484598,0.047746126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011651331,0.000024636458,0.00191216,0.002056594,0.000021725473,0.00008252916,0.012459881,0.00011657839,0.00017866021,0.26581332,0.71729743,0.000024828145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09576184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16205473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09576184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027455352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048328985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19920343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386166084","doi":"10.59962/9780774850629-011","title":"Appendix 1: Judge Advocate Generals in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appendix; Law; Political science; History; Geology","score_opus":0.04589053676840493,"score_gpt":0.25512277863086585,"score_spread":0.20923224186246092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386166084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028240755,0.0014322866,0.00039883523,0.016936997,0.0013629599,0.000577916,0.0073316004,0.00019292261,0.96894246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013510554,0.0008541404,0.0004415085,0.008334751,0.00014038439,0.0001808403,0.00094804575,0.000066452805,0.97552335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769115,0.00015290409,0.000080242906,0.00016523607,0.001136864,0.0007735139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99379444,0.0012870758,0.00013045686,0.0001572473,0.0039712414,0.0006596203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013617546,0.00071952376,0.00066593237,0.0031717164,0.016843382,0.005599175,0.0024327,0.00916724,0.24823837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009531809,0.0008325708,0.00047308416,0.0048194123,0.0013583668,0.0017204179,0.0013158313,0.0043386687,0.030934814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000643871,0.000013630828,0.0002883656,0.00003812877,0.0000010501508,0.00011634602,0.00031428918,0.000050386065,0.000028788516,0.011527592,0.9827292,0.0048857518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017659686,0.000005020517,0.001997487,0.00012499679,0.000006139709,0.00005222701,0.0011093736,0.0000983091,0.00007895404,0.0014951684,0.9949936,0.000021194493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9531963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9854936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24823837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043376744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11871989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83044004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386170259","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.11","title":"Aspiration and Reality in Legal Education David Sandomierski","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05579560268917917,"score_gpt":0.4047973337528322,"score_spread":0.34900173106365306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386170259","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013411594,0.10566454,0.002487309,0.55580544,0.0022572274,0.000021479722,0.00006318066,0.000031313226,0.32025787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7080119,0.13242003,0.0025868164,0.036577363,0.0017648861,0.00007241633,0.000059936057,0.00007355056,0.1184331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982591,0.0009965777,0.00005067032,0.00014610509,0.0003952489,0.00015228949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973603,0.0016605248,0.00010968315,0.000055654782,0.0003656546,0.0004481254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002593291,0.00025601327,0.00041338112,0.0011362842,0.0043207556,0.0070546237,0.00044054494,0.0019399186,0.0057438463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004421322,0.0002748404,0.00014190831,0.0009995787,0.013842972,0.0067694597,0.0030079973,0.004933046,0.0010835568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015234675,0.00004031576,0.00057571527,0.00009553143,0.0000038646012,0.000067446694,0.005544541,0.00020208099,0.00006102105,0.89963377,0.07046972,0.02329075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016858356,0.00001999413,0.0012445697,0.0005436166,0.0000045325255,0.000102125436,0.00903322,0.00039951075,0.00009165637,0.68246543,0.30604693,0.00003150009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01770354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024951752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004707767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03621894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386175803","doi":"10.59962/9780774855396-002","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.06068863955259684,"score_gpt":0.28669161791566455,"score_spread":0.2260029783630677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386175803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002909679,0.014681656,0.005505269,0.36062303,0.039781302,0.00044560732,0.044103667,0.0020575926,0.52989227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01229201,0.0027552575,0.0029136087,0.017200837,0.0014269626,0.00010988967,0.004474204,0.00044373766,0.9583835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975682,0.00027436012,0.00006340891,0.00023574734,0.0015580981,0.00030024338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846853,0.0006420678,0.00026984606,0.00028363217,0.011838318,0.0022807827],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023484477,0.00059246225,0.0005119682,0.0021756035,0.0043998184,0.0029879627,0.0012040404,0.0014013188,0.19989239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010248873,0.00029555472,0.00032739353,0.002668104,0.00083483174,0.0016509962,0.0023130267,0.003058289,0.072978444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013998101,0.0000033149906,0.00022670395,0.000025950336,0.0000011235885,0.000035575395,0.00017090281,0.000020948371,0.00005251985,0.0034990034,0.9854069,0.010543101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019204417,0.0000010204807,0.00043037,0.00003419457,0.0000018148195,0.000042118005,0.00030197576,0.000028542365,0.000043086467,0.0004328878,0.9986771,0.0000048982097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55940294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7538343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8001076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014195503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026110834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88638365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386181658","doi":"10.59962/9780774850193-007","title":"Ethics in Canadian Universities","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06822722028065194,"score_gpt":0.29696406343938686,"score_spread":0.22873684315873494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386181658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0087132715,0.020769872,0.00077309395,0.08148248,0.0014422312,0.000052198076,0.00022745994,0.00006595843,0.88647336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24613057,0.011827177,0.0016804092,0.016250603,0.00038420278,0.000071000526,0.00015194507,0.00012864874,0.72337544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99297076,0.0013215918,0.00014694381,0.0005054247,0.002395747,0.0026596533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948112,0.00089846127,0.00013162938,0.00021690532,0.0021976468,0.0017441894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034841641,0.0007968472,0.0006792322,0.004105694,0.04249846,0.019533886,0.0020086465,0.007525571,0.027293691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0088029,0.00078548625,0.0005957729,0.007109322,0.017791418,0.004167291,0.0042237327,0.009029166,0.002070016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011752922,0.000017622846,0.00040118475,0.00005064319,0.000004580477,0.000112809066,0.007843233,0.00023518986,0.000046593064,0.8184908,0.15639205,0.016393537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000661761,0.0000043850364,0.0014377942,0.0001634539,0.000006290315,0.000047632704,0.0055954535,0.000165706,0.00005340016,0.033054866,0.9594364,0.000027838869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9917602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7504594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24954064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3501357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8704265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386423294","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2023.2233876","title":"Can that be law for me? <b>The Long Arc of Legality: Hobbes, Kelsen, Hart</b> , edited by David Dyzenhaus, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2022, hardback/ebook, (ISBN: 978131651805-2) £73.00, pp. i-xiv, 1-475","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi; Mansfield College, University of Oxford","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.050260016145901705,"score_gpt":0.33131046721104523,"score_spread":0.28105045106514354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386423294","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001753958,0.27006528,0.0045182034,0.43981573,0.011903205,0.000022359434,0.00010812888,0.000107966895,0.27170518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16839965,0.2954304,0.009662685,0.14884073,0.014634748,0.00016676706,0.00035089525,0.0004383293,0.36207572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985329,0.0006954524,0.00004221953,0.00015491394,0.0003584959,0.00021590263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986519,0.00083235506,0.00011871843,0.00008680865,0.00013843739,0.00017182458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020293775,0.0005021653,0.00046516207,0.0009513399,0.003360064,0.00901863,0.0007181071,0.0038919435,0.019910244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046905456,0.00035517983,0.00035366273,0.00126607,0.019162474,0.013205413,0.0024274243,0.005456653,0.007865681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012562714,0.000015616459,0.00013856497,0.0002861328,0.000005846518,0.00008332007,0.005688062,0.000045409943,0.00014562756,0.48661304,0.4478219,0.059143934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002496801,0.0000053092504,0.00016331069,0.0004478476,0.0000019668412,0.00009067116,0.0028362314,0.000025326504,0.000048875834,0.12485824,0.87151307,0.0000066548287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006348775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009940749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019910244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031102516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058255577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0666064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386469274","doi":"10.7202/1100314ar","title":"Les tribunaux comme objet de recherche en sciences sociales et sciences humaines","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Human science; Humanities; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.39931877058160004,"score_gpt":0.4666293668989892,"score_spread":0.06731059631738917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386469274","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034233797,0.16508628,0.008561387,0.41650376,0.016619127,0.0005880394,0.0012520936,0.00022334895,0.35693222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38239637,0.100916974,0.012179612,0.058765385,0.0038381673,0.0010426545,0.0012695066,0.00028807606,0.4393032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9563369,0.020194367,0.0030342927,0.0025860954,0.012953027,0.0048951646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.950747,0.017814422,0.0027642543,0.0065399297,0.017052025,0.0050822734],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036389116,0.00065446825,0.0012518663,0.0032943569,0.008946187,0.015387079,0.002290928,0.006281125,0.023129588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055768806,0.0006880298,0.0008454496,0.006099299,0.018817443,0.0071696485,0.008927451,0.007972171,0.005119431],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014624889,0.00012942571,0.0066650994,0.0020517209,0.000056954617,0.00039017713,0.031517886,0.00025181493,0.002396186,0.54639953,0.15429331,0.2557017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032851345,0.00005902914,0.009789812,0.001409165,0.000018061683,0.00016401379,0.01112065,0.00006746742,0.0008937031,0.012686611,0.963715,0.000043698965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1376257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14510444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020946328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.067536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27364928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386800476","doi":"10.23977/aetp.2023.071004","title":"An Exploration of Moral Education and Rule of Law Education in the Course of Ideological and Political Theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; Northwestern University","keywords":"Morality; Legal education; Sociology; Law; Rule of law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05589902648274713,"score_gpt":0.5018271828151759,"score_spread":0.44592815633242877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386800476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058652814,0.015276977,0.030980244,0.08815115,0.0010676298,0.00012412384,0.00004011456,0.00004842188,0.80565846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9353899,0.007352076,0.010153554,0.006308067,0.0010968773,0.0002511288,0.000042383122,0.000066667395,0.03933926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957794,0.003118792,0.00005077568,0.00018678821,0.00042491095,0.00043927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99522984,0.0038074797,0.00021984699,0.00014488684,0.00017554211,0.00042241972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004770241,0.0005150113,0.0005050376,0.0020100323,0.0065684235,0.011369906,0.0015581405,0.0044323024,0.0038476265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050117583,0.00028021124,0.0005501754,0.0016196998,0.046077203,0.010592945,0.004966485,0.009128717,0.0003861665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019130016,0.00003522858,0.00011084631,0.000018439216,6.588284e-7,0.000044482247,0.0074107926,0.0001143451,0.000021147682,0.9874233,0.00086162897,0.003957229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007589612,0.000025221352,0.0007867893,0.00025204054,0.0000017015071,0.000090095826,0.008974882,0.0012671286,0.000093921364,0.9153045,0.07318555,0.000010592628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049154945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005709417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012236727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012236727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007735355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0887841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386971959","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501768521.003.0015","title":"Annus Horribilis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cornell University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Champion; Supreme court; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; History","score_opus":0.15152706590082476,"score_gpt":0.2929931824947224,"score_spread":0.14146611659389763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386971959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011668286,0.011001251,0.00073996984,0.010496766,0.0052141096,0.00002800092,0.00012553654,0.00016841682,0.971059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008964392,0.0033333625,0.00030506775,0.003029932,0.0008199797,0.000024619303,0.000064599495,0.00007647502,0.9833815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970406,0.00004786058,0.000007659393,0.00007048958,0.0001270292,0.000042897853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997501,0.00007053297,0.000019061026,0.000031295025,0.000086742395,0.00004220292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033934726,0.0005726304,0.00024268962,0.0010149427,0.0027986185,0.0024947203,0.0006098287,0.0009952963,0.08838335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010124969,0.00018016572,0.00021221694,0.0005700062,0.0016515448,0.001987673,0.0016680437,0.0028150976,0.04272572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023001363,0.00003457461,0.00021422633,0.00012417993,0.000002036647,0.00015361475,0.0018268394,0.00008474096,0.00034466528,0.21739449,0.6879276,0.09187002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.756081e-7,0.0000034341222,0.000069899696,0.00003614047,5.334658e-7,0.000049749815,0.00013584414,0.000015359552,0.000055372253,0.0028367876,0.9967949,0.0000012737859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004068642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073624756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08838335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018941901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011376229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29567176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386984665","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-96073-6_9669","title":"Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the United Kingdom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington; Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Killam Trusts; Tel Aviv University; Camargo Foundation; University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Canada Council for the Arts; Government of Canada","keywords":"Commonwealth; Scholarship; Kingdom; Commission; Political science; Public administration; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.18324664096516216,"score_gpt":0.39590582291457416,"score_spread":0.212659181949412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386984665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015832037,0.029635733,0.00032101944,0.006383844,0.0017078139,0.00003822614,0.0017108769,0.00027280443,0.9583465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042781606,0.0032449043,0.00011559033,0.00029922268,0.00004337011,0.000015643061,0.00016076559,0.00007827381,0.991764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906915,0.00010043997,0.000073036994,0.00018730186,0.00041088136,0.00015923595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855536,0.00029660598,0.00011141388,0.0002403079,0.0005051408,0.00029111997],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051457685,0.00087990426,0.0007831044,0.0016358753,0.00486331,0.008599592,0.00072238565,0.0035260979,0.29367018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027376865,0.0006564401,0.00033598472,0.0035013335,0.0017010933,0.0029190958,0.0025414918,0.0027168687,0.09820151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057935093,0.00001855358,0.0003295135,0.0004828129,0.0000079818965,0.00064900407,0.0012828357,0.00016096642,0.00038658196,0.093106866,0.7891303,0.11438657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019695847,0.0000046180503,0.00035681154,0.00011641558,0.0000010436748,0.000047315178,0.00015999436,0.000008054537,0.000035276556,0.0005938347,0.9986713,0.0000033215526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09866801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34145683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7063298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067755794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071979677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387103439","doi":"10.1017/s1744552323000228","title":"Deliberative Experience and the Civic Aspirations of Legal Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Queen Mary University of London","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Scholarship; Politics; Legal education; Sociology; Law; Political science; Civic engagement; Public administration","score_opus":0.07293135299148787,"score_gpt":0.4386718920952426,"score_spread":0.3657405391037547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387103439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8816729,0.00023341658,0.0025052968,0.0057159564,0.000043385968,0.00002938563,0.000010308068,0.000020076443,0.109769255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861026,0.000032572007,0.00013388263,0.0001227652,0.0000046417426,0.0000047043027,0.0000025935515,0.000003322522,0.0010853795],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99159664,0.006095242,0.00015269322,0.00042732817,0.0009072569,0.00082082616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907607,0.005050222,0.0011659542,0.0005559693,0.00048632672,0.0019808533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007919784,0.00017356715,0.00023131781,0.001055662,0.0073356666,0.01136264,0.0006449198,0.0017380468,0.00566675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009936152,0.00022434321,0.0002518549,0.00043262632,0.028205652,0.0048318626,0.011141403,0.0038757517,0.0003723955],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048158643,0.0004824153,0.018841112,0.00009524369,0.000014953607,0.00043986386,0.78441936,0.00025188606,0.0011576575,0.17676571,0.001462231,0.016021369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047822243,0.00020468346,0.024645923,0.00029423708,0.000015973563,0.00056209817,0.7835399,0.00096461945,0.00087799376,0.099715106,0.08906073,0.00007087311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014854819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024807127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01136264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002367127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002797739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041884363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387234202","doi":"10.1080/17508487.2023.2261472","title":"Kîyokêwin (Visiting), leadership, and consenting to learn in public: indigenizing social sciences and humanities at the Royal Military College of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sociology; Law; Indigenization; Supreme court; Treaty; Political science; Media studies","score_opus":0.298791295127758,"score_gpt":0.4611899160526445,"score_spread":0.1623986209248865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387234202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6308287,0.005335222,0.0060431343,0.17811275,0.0011463612,0.00024389963,0.00008146294,0.00010316852,0.17810541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97144455,0.0013145679,0.0009732948,0.005536625,0.00003732793,0.000041325377,0.000011225729,0.000055837994,0.020585297],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900994,0.004986895,0.00013184632,0.00064463675,0.0013499582,0.002787246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985408,0.005993108,0.00095477124,0.00064515043,0.0017464823,0.005252402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080639785,0.00034303387,0.0004080328,0.0010410864,0.062273957,0.015404534,0.0018828453,0.0026676178,0.0056224405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0140634095,0.00041366453,0.00025721136,0.0013089472,0.06030115,0.004453053,0.010855481,0.00792496,0.00035014356],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016407446,0.000028331146,0.0026471098,0.00006754064,0.0000044448116,0.0007899909,0.93808746,0.00007602863,0.00024095902,0.03209132,0.011417611,0.0145328455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018766087,0.00000975644,0.0014269238,0.00013405737,0.0000046037135,0.00021456105,0.9277016,0.000052864478,0.00013953767,0.0033018677,0.066988274,0.000024057661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8649428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9528114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.937726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065240994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14656065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47335875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387617283","doi":"10.24144/2307-3322.2023.79.1.16","title":"Access to justice in Canada: A noteworthy experience","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07592047492229895,"score_gpt":0.3662415899813295,"score_spread":0.2903211150590306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387617283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4253465,0.028129436,0.0016258542,0.2963063,0.003271864,0.0002800158,0.0011571044,0.00015786823,0.24372506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91198283,0.015270623,0.0008153879,0.028161537,0.00029022884,0.000056435983,0.00023882953,0.00010332255,0.043080647],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896259,0.0012916246,0.00024324469,0.00060171675,0.0039474815,0.0042900313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850347,0.0023768272,0.000508277,0.00033539833,0.004838507,0.006906221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003972813,0.00052708184,0.0008457219,0.0020655831,0.060678586,0.012597689,0.002968206,0.005380029,0.008461342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010150907,0.0006126121,0.0006285009,0.008566483,0.014294647,0.0034932203,0.0077973073,0.008322647,0.00042184125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020465316,0.00037105678,0.036901556,0.0006822709,0.00008298534,0.01550839,0.49272293,0.0010151435,0.0014240836,0.14020157,0.18073541,0.13014995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002615396,0.00009187924,0.03231421,0.0005448186,0.000042959487,0.0019910173,0.28731745,0.0005134362,0.00031806703,0.0039418605,0.6726622,0.00023594526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18164101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18164101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36608014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9491804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387987630","doi":"10.1515/9782763759449-004","title":"Le champ juridique canadien et les juristes réformateurs","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.05027829881553902,"score_gpt":0.3299827382815399,"score_spread":0.2797044394660009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387987630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00715073,0.017885083,0.003644414,0.05442211,0.001851652,0.00004727561,0.000060142236,0.00008798282,0.91485065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13667534,0.006570815,0.0021031392,0.005838046,0.0014472574,0.00012092472,0.000052149335,0.00011530732,0.84707713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949463,0.0019228818,0.00009623008,0.0005234055,0.00180367,0.00070760224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969458,0.0019581062,0.00015577543,0.00021480942,0.00048729085,0.00023818835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049277195,0.0008064524,0.0007206186,0.002021223,0.011128345,0.012108025,0.0015648983,0.009390253,0.025219193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010260416,0.0007052392,0.00039000466,0.0022967882,0.01580982,0.005533157,0.0028290825,0.013718526,0.004256856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004347752,0.000011763787,0.000065086766,0.00001474861,0.0000012535935,0.000026404434,0.0016489881,0.000115001225,0.0000341561,0.9704378,0.01913024,0.00851025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014024231,0.000014179156,0.00055767334,0.0001292978,0.0000039852016,0.000078729274,0.0013009417,0.00032257038,0.0001380377,0.1531011,0.8443238,0.00001562229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09220137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10033481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02223373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022249373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18332934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388174527","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195386073.003.0011","title":"The Role Of Volunteer Lawyers In Challenging The Conditions Of A Local Housing Crisis In Buffalo, Ny","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Legal profession; Legal service; Public relations; Service (business); Public administration; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.02536815595630202,"score_gpt":0.33197943563615434,"score_spread":0.3066112796798523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388174527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5287715,0.00760754,0.0021221363,0.20969643,0.0033684627,0.00046728086,0.00010658459,0.00020412878,0.24765596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82313466,0.0035663012,0.0022829496,0.017870529,0.0008485031,0.00029447264,0.00010617517,0.00012549543,0.15177089],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982492,0.0009914091,0.000016656819,0.00008411119,0.00016908263,0.0004895499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662423,0.00074215955,0.00015812411,0.000055810717,0.00025919432,0.002160442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003099952,0.00022698623,0.00031226283,0.0005977497,0.018693997,0.0071159382,0.0022444841,0.0035182524,0.019332064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036327161,0.00023374593,0.00013803555,0.00061795407,0.0068188286,0.0028053818,0.006715018,0.0040179417,0.0011056467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105101266,0.0010957789,0.010226781,0.00030916283,0.000014524646,0.005467626,0.36412257,0.00047783373,0.0015048883,0.047399156,0.4492707,0.120006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002924674,0.00017410704,0.0048748692,0.0002837009,0.0000054546463,0.00040269824,0.55563384,0.00051708665,0.00021875705,0.0044361874,0.43340042,0.000023588163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02476771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17469965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02476771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006090769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014154403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06467217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388280863","doi":"10.1037/law0000404","title":"Deaf community experiences in the Canadian justice system.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychology Public Policy and Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.19857336616868973,"score_gpt":0.48777933323038203,"score_spread":0.2892059670616923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388280863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8123987,0.0034135967,0.00043622832,0.05448218,0.0010299875,0.0002010232,0.00028705448,0.000051817184,0.12769946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749829,0.0009678705,0.00012032107,0.00457043,0.000048893166,0.000038110007,0.000041274034,0.000018943869,0.019211205],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902458,0.0023255334,0.000101563106,0.00037437884,0.0014931465,0.0054595554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99122566,0.0010978031,0.00038751756,0.00013911413,0.0017700992,0.005379813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035669007,0.00047804383,0.0005545967,0.0013737064,0.07203337,0.007884218,0.0023233525,0.0034467115,0.012539611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010516619,0.00037777293,0.00033314218,0.0023756847,0.0152325705,0.0026859243,0.011945887,0.006185376,0.00056640146],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060572715,0.00016930752,0.0089985505,0.00009931855,0.000012883509,0.0019953582,0.92249703,0.00007028005,0.00024998796,0.011300163,0.029605439,0.024941133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007380537,0.000030145591,0.008638831,0.000117156334,0.000009233436,0.0002438248,0.9344555,0.000033028857,0.0000652271,0.00058388035,0.05578756,0.000028170258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96408504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07203337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066095434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14220525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47955817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388734056","doi":"10.29242/lawstats.2022","title":"ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 2022","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Library science; Academic library; Political science; Law; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2879908352415222,"score_gpt":0.5210549830829864,"score_spread":0.23306414784146418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388734056","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054016616,0.0006256233,0.000590431,0.0016267106,0.0005570352,0.00012101496,0.91525143,0.0022675544,0.07841987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004069152,0.0016236507,0.0022123745,0.0010941252,0.00052533566,0.00042722054,0.8333401,0.001250023,0.15545814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921868,0.0005831154,0.00058803975,0.0004144011,0.005666547,0.0005610537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707285,0.004358295,0.0022469717,0.0021277452,0.01930401,0.0012344557],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003393876,0.001203326,0.00095341675,0.010926748,0.0014729188,0.005880508,0.0014485396,0.0010426934,0.09612339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024107218,0.00091519376,0.0005594176,0.02886621,0.0003345346,0.0021616009,0.0011420833,0.0022500718,0.18457294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008258391,0.000006746283,0.00027583828,0.000024299094,0.0000018117504,0.0000031877275,0.000007772881,0.000042301413,0.000008464915,0.0005001046,0.9943703,0.004750885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001027908,0.000006871968,0.006323908,0.00010025203,0.000003921164,0.000014370133,0.000041678624,0.00018472012,0.00009509412,0.0003394226,0.9928631,0.000016456814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2808509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2656616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070818285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019710457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55843234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388759617","doi":"10.36591/se-d-4604-07","title":"Freedom of Information Requests and Peer Review Reports","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Editor","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Confidentiality; Transparency (behavior); Internet privacy; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Misconduct; Public relations; Academic freedom; Context (archaeology); Institution; Political science; Intellectual property; Anonymity; Business; Law; Computer science; Higher education","score_opus":0.036391627848315275,"score_gpt":0.4145758166783184,"score_spread":0.3781841888300031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388759617","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012419411,0.021053087,0.03207963,0.49766278,0.1701814,0.0051090685,0.0013045056,0.0019401326,0.26942736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06328611,0.028537879,0.048758782,0.3553783,0.19731334,0.014509073,0.0023794163,0.00293787,0.28689927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.36751837,0.27807504,0.07628699,0.03396469,0.22649701,0.017657897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.14164385,0.5115756,0.04410315,0.10197579,0.18308736,0.017614156],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.39920947,0.0023085799,0.004770389,0.009668581,0.017632913,0.05346879,0.016254524,0.056983497,0.036150657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7645796,0.0032755318,0.0038693487,0.011195902,0.033319924,0.026924545,0.019369163,0.03844815,0.034185883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007347266,0.000057222525,0.0002850241,0.0016517725,0.00004886881,0.0003525853,0.002822514,0.00025743333,0.00020045537,0.24375881,0.7079625,0.042529315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030101346,0.000024770661,0.00023335741,0.0012857507,0.00001204769,0.000108131186,0.0004858524,0.00024037909,0.00015131384,0.028584687,0.9687635,0.00008011975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075306655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0085538365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94653124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016425358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09299408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7408817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388972738","doi":"10.1108/s0733-558x202387","title":"Revitalizing Collegiality: Restoring Faculty Authority in Universities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research in the sociology of organizations","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stockholms Universitet; Uppsala Universitet; Vetenskapsrådet; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Division of Chemistry; Umeå Universitet","keywords":"Collegiality; Political science; Management; Public administration; Sociology; Pedagogy; Economics","score_opus":0.35525272268596053,"score_gpt":0.5390946225824963,"score_spread":0.18384189989653577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388972738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08415748,0.0285914,0.004770457,0.24611941,0.009967867,0.000080051104,0.000037034588,0.00042250016,0.6258538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7075745,0.007141833,0.0021368994,0.0091707455,0.0030251541,0.000044155568,0.000035552206,0.00026571276,0.27060553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570507,0.0019008038,0.00010909543,0.00021165125,0.0010190991,0.0010543085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99375254,0.0017886868,0.00029986695,0.0003848268,0.0007636819,0.0030103356],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051448797,0.0002955801,0.00036398004,0.0025594488,0.016792605,0.015946995,0.0018863265,0.0042369375,0.012053279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011802198,0.00022997415,0.0005218034,0.0022545292,0.012587135,0.012630263,0.011236342,0.0050698766,0.0020547532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044668017,0.00011499106,0.0014403365,0.00019133036,0.000011528571,0.0003216269,0.12871435,0.00045213947,0.00037835012,0.4351718,0.18989249,0.24326634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014300411,0.000051290433,0.0019357195,0.0003556539,0.000009144375,0.00017243494,0.045521505,0.00025201557,0.00045227667,0.06923788,0.88197166,0.00002607063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008441463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03223413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008976338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015760733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06512821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388987439","doi":"10.1515/9781552383452-004","title":"The Legal Archives Society of Alberta","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.0323552443942359,"score_gpt":0.26604797805714625,"score_spread":0.23369273366291035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388987439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028192832,0.036615558,0.0003453375,0.019990986,0.0046967156,0.000023040091,0.0003715932,0.00022388597,0.9349135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0077726133,0.0057028937,0.00026365498,0.000622011,0.00019822827,0.0000055072546,0.00010690708,0.000030155647,0.98529804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990428,0.000069010406,0.000024185087,0.00011267814,0.00053440157,0.00021698102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853134,0.00019259623,0.00005787074,0.00012246784,0.00056609494,0.00052956765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001054802,0.00048396853,0.00037644978,0.0017107478,0.006243256,0.011132806,0.0013268908,0.0031003424,0.12262736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001971902,0.0004675996,0.00020012028,0.0024181884,0.0029084822,0.0018112996,0.0029446757,0.0029555848,0.02220847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016901055,0.00002102608,0.0005218814,0.00007716875,0.0000029434793,0.00021785853,0.0010756389,0.0001347483,0.00013510938,0.076977104,0.8018537,0.11896587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011930455,0.0000012936326,0.00040198662,0.000048276037,0.0000010615042,0.00003078566,0.0003897608,0.000021639442,0.000022860775,0.0012926579,0.9977858,0.0000025668435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6096617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82773113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3903383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015039528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047343478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78527415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389050480","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2022.95","title":"Revolving Doors: Social Dimensions of Law Firm Culture and Pathways out of Firms","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Human capital; Collegiality; Corporate law; Social capital; Business; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Political science; Corporate governance; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.14629373761606684,"score_gpt":0.4132128146671756,"score_spread":0.26691907705110873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389050480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996979,0.000045241843,0.00013399922,0.00026856016,0.0000029778455,0.000005685803,0.000022847214,0.00000226113,0.0025394317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997414,0.000024492469,0.000025918049,0.000020394436,0.000001399315,0.0000021497237,0.000012241301,0.0000014066417,0.00017069685],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997428,0.0010334635,0.00008609557,0.00024562114,0.00036544568,0.00084142684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835549,0.0052137855,0.004997431,0.00066198857,0.0013170112,0.004254836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002234204,0.00015338021,0.00023994867,0.0017741438,0.004098082,0.005343963,0.00093148905,0.0005409894,0.0061298334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013093035,0.00023735766,0.00019485771,0.0015749668,0.0041149543,0.0023200281,0.0035378325,0.0011977107,0.00023348466],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006411667,0.0002586175,0.90110326,0.000020618618,0.00006056532,0.0001923092,0.07749685,0.00036587458,0.0002633305,0.0061362903,0.0005619287,0.013476254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006882832,0.00006480148,0.7735535,0.000067479596,0.000017091234,0.00006439285,0.22035329,0.00064147776,0.0001242145,0.0025867214,0.0024922895,0.000027887227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08130984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13314764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08130984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034382592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003991882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16167313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389317178","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_121","title":"Framework of Considerations for Academic Integrity in Quality Assurance in Canadian Higher Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Academic integrity; Higher education; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Jurisdiction; Curriculum; Public relations; Engineering management; Engineering ethics; Business; Engineering; Operations management; Law; External quality assessment","score_opus":0.24590412210266446,"score_gpt":0.4924771975916611,"score_spread":0.24657307548899662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389317178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004294117,0.005570648,0.0136416005,0.08323062,0.00086360716,0.00017469942,0.00015977792,0.00007581172,0.8919891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5070519,0.007074876,0.037382316,0.025375627,0.0008712618,0.00048002924,0.00019202202,0.00017652502,0.42139542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98823637,0.003150515,0.0002600013,0.0007016582,0.0047265324,0.002924881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99306494,0.001673711,0.00020517249,0.0002534144,0.003621463,0.0011813913],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012131091,0.0010240342,0.00064591947,0.005223626,0.023287412,0.02341974,0.0046896706,0.011067024,0.008962444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011168965,0.0007251066,0.00095099764,0.0049228356,0.03544903,0.004948944,0.004227097,0.011292471,0.00105144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011731103,0.0000033436845,0.00003413565,0.000010756574,8.969904e-7,0.000031917698,0.0011829219,0.00018343912,0.000017225568,0.9867048,0.009634377,0.0021950924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137701245,0.000012126183,0.0011347706,0.000631555,0.0000202654,0.00018327312,0.0075254464,0.0016856376,0.00023760897,0.44773814,0.54074997,0.00006741495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95256203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96816874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98893297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17591807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27123848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95581824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389332693","doi":"10.7202/1107389ar","title":"[ Sans Titre - No Title ]CONSTITUTION DU ROYAUME-UNI : DES ORIGINES À NOS JOURS","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Humanities; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.014443653544432927,"score_gpt":0.2591921797009691,"score_spread":0.24474852615653617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389332693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018561123,0.054518547,0.005373749,0.1296994,0.008606349,0.000074220385,0.0005470353,0.0002629091,0.7823567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4006686,0.021392453,0.004217748,0.018122014,0.0036931622,0.00018257153,0.00037844206,0.00033285376,0.5510122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797374,0.00067152217,0.00007986933,0.00033747792,0.0005992783,0.00033813145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988267,0.000361228,0.00017036365,0.0001698904,0.0003547228,0.00011710229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018344293,0.00040102794,0.00039177056,0.0011093445,0.005159249,0.0062231296,0.0012201471,0.0028203574,0.021898786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051546763,0.00027432857,0.00032322688,0.0017177231,0.009183393,0.004900134,0.0025036358,0.006271813,0.0049904054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002458333,0.000009053488,0.00031463229,0.000097345954,0.000004872118,0.00007684947,0.009022145,0.00004282893,0.00022060338,0.8952866,0.0775914,0.017309075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042945303,0.0000101808055,0.0011634921,0.00019231255,0.000004028114,0.000070580165,0.0018648942,0.00005167312,0.00028414634,0.015196181,0.98113936,0.000018691682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064989686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091181226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064989686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009759385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004697873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12922281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389333278","doi":"10.7202/1105869ar","title":"AVANT-PROPOS","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Sherbrooke","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.02610686971817812,"score_gpt":0.28349780817845643,"score_spread":0.25739093846027833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389333278","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017732281,0.10719893,0.00753324,0.39211673,0.08399874,0.0002978542,0.0012978979,0.00042282537,0.3894015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16222723,0.04731796,0.008507173,0.15233095,0.009462672,0.000382578,0.0014628447,0.00048190847,0.6178267],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98832345,0.0024900232,0.00052647345,0.001466671,0.005565801,0.001627484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98917097,0.0017779402,0.00048697655,0.0008942223,0.0060350136,0.0016348339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071154535,0.0007573781,0.00066421303,0.0016350198,0.0064477543,0.011776617,0.0018280918,0.0045511597,0.037700437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0241053,0.0004358451,0.000953499,0.0019179343,0.005795733,0.0059792534,0.005803297,0.0060158013,0.01204968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014660605,0.0000744122,0.006078965,0.0011804712,0.00007059861,0.0013008591,0.0149938315,0.00025601452,0.0012060951,0.29206365,0.5173363,0.16529222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051605234,0.000010348589,0.00067709706,0.00047526712,0.000013277477,0.00028884737,0.0030358832,0.00002736373,0.00044744933,0.0033340014,0.9916658,0.000019403087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10391064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19679233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10391064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017995207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024814874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20661157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389599817","doi":"10.4337/9781803921426.00006","title":"Introducing law clinics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07289489891367576,"score_gpt":0.3533706939635994,"score_spread":0.2804757950499236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389599817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034621973,0.029192705,0.01180635,0.022538397,0.0064775352,0.0004165948,0.00031086593,0.0008448851,0.9249505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028450558,0.0401772,0.02124051,0.020331955,0.001930775,0.0005195347,0.0005284313,0.00035516603,0.8864659],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920505,0.00026209906,0.00003132172,0.00010066125,0.0002679872,0.00013286754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994574,0.00021870411,0.000042693922,0.000020381742,0.00009244472,0.00016841915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005413964,0.0005995027,0.0003006711,0.001055102,0.0029446937,0.004796765,0.00094086764,0.0033255084,0.063087106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013287321,0.00044844806,0.00032572885,0.0011735383,0.0020938255,0.0049663056,0.0032322404,0.005163242,0.019122995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000112190855,0.00017349015,0.00036329028,0.00044269027,0.000002041852,0.00065494794,0.008801945,0.00026425166,0.0006603367,0.24433184,0.58547497,0.15881908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020368168,0.000012734853,0.00012687898,0.00021247276,4.426051e-7,0.0004312665,0.0008249537,0.00002617272,0.00003502741,0.0044666743,0.9938571,0.0000041364797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033044117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009649625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063087106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023575916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003928397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21104741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390718764","doi":"10.1017/9781108779968","title":"The Science of Virtue","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Foundation (evidence); Value (mathematics); Moral character; Engineering ethics; Resource (disambiguation); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03457755299512095,"score_gpt":0.2978143054580405,"score_spread":0.26323675246291955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390718764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001582499,0.039759435,0.0059969905,0.02247721,0.0026376606,0.0000245199,0.0000925015,0.00010432915,0.9273249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.098785274,0.04502629,0.010214262,0.012145837,0.0039919936,0.00013495625,0.00023553606,0.00015452695,0.82931125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994885,0.00015901832,0.000014565891,0.000059376285,0.00023555328,0.00004296946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996307,0.00016624265,0.000024488567,0.0000477656,0.00007019756,0.00006054606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005226646,0.00041232855,0.00037048318,0.0010188003,0.0018882467,0.004656721,0.0005325008,0.0012655805,0.015436541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014367623,0.00021510565,0.00029176867,0.0007818413,0.0071563893,0.0038537926,0.0018446363,0.0027166684,0.0045181555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036114352,0.000008216246,0.00012571119,0.000083109044,0.000003248818,0.00003035635,0.0009461171,0.00011424476,0.00009474187,0.8148239,0.14255716,0.041209478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001757886,0.000006444064,0.00026916555,0.00015351517,0.0000013226339,0.00009513647,0.00040273636,0.00013543107,0.000054296423,0.21725729,0.78161895,0.000003911282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019381016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033539187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015436541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018661551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021695243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05164033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391174902","doi":"10.56367/oag-041-11263","title":"Impacts to address sexual violence in Canada and internationally","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Access Government","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual violence; Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.06599118521184377,"score_gpt":0.4530828338700458,"score_spread":0.387091648658202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391174902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024221154,0.025293795,0.0014795983,0.30216178,0.0034647875,0.00038979083,0.003668917,0.00049646624,0.6388237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5309513,0.0732876,0.01085895,0.07300389,0.0011869526,0.0004992972,0.0060334564,0.00039433074,0.30378413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902637,0.0007374325,0.00016130596,0.00020579704,0.0048466055,0.0037852013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796473,0.00060099835,0.00034102396,0.00019304409,0.0091008125,0.01011692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047213305,0.0008079084,0.00040797447,0.0036407283,0.009600652,0.0057530063,0.0019703938,0.0020030884,0.031496007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010980359,0.0002848651,0.0010199749,0.0028546157,0.002584765,0.0016151997,0.008665526,0.004154423,0.0016030677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007889785,0.00027921342,0.023109103,0.000716524,0.0000807516,0.0003814525,0.0038032937,0.001531091,0.00062888634,0.050127614,0.53331536,0.3859478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041640364,0.00011392308,0.0396443,0.0015395728,0.00007952194,0.00015497039,0.008303944,0.00041937127,0.0004443117,0.0057870224,0.94339883,0.00007263358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9795672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08059959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08059959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40224305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5847937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391205036","doi":"10.5040/9798400655036.ch-041","title":"William Vickrey (1914-1996): An Expert on Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection and a Laureate of 1996","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nobel laureate; Moral hazard; Adverse selection; Hazard; Selection (genetic algorithm); Economics; Philosophy; Actuarial science; Computer science; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.048279948193667675,"score_gpt":0.35949576761436897,"score_spread":0.3112158194207013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391205036","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008409593,0.39413208,0.0045261947,0.4923859,0.0512012,0.00003348231,0.0002564897,0.000066803404,0.05655688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03442753,0.38321307,0.007067534,0.07472604,0.060001206,0.00008315869,0.00018247707,0.00023490828,0.44006413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743444,0.00056369574,0.00024208694,0.00044239123,0.0010860101,0.00023139917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99122614,0.0029502031,0.00063539547,0.00025576283,0.002890575,0.0020419047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050272546,0.0008979457,0.00091352116,0.0025428182,0.0019925646,0.003884056,0.0011118122,0.005006537,0.011792465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014325989,0.0005923299,0.00042012485,0.0014860994,0.0038826799,0.00510007,0.0017055164,0.007795197,0.0053086113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001946356,0.000012485041,0.0004196608,0.00008970296,0.0000057636976,0.000115121686,0.0003062125,0.00017920797,0.00005634788,0.011738734,0.94761944,0.039437823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003456392,0.0000055521446,0.00027035884,0.0002982903,0.0000034545335,0.000258264,0.00016499711,0.00007793673,0.00010317646,0.007886458,0.9909128,0.000015156249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019874047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03076627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019874047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071769026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072221304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052072346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391348386","doi":"10.51644/9781771121644-006","title":"Civil Liberties in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil liberties; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03986463632364933,"score_gpt":0.3013173707859355,"score_spread":0.2614527344622862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391348386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01263552,0.02268363,0.0005966733,0.040291607,0.0015148278,0.000059264366,0.00033584758,0.000054851786,0.9218278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16512199,0.014722446,0.00078926247,0.00864898,0.00027466906,0.00004536292,0.00019073185,0.00008449392,0.8101221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707234,0.00022183481,0.00005381315,0.00021262393,0.001039709,0.0013997005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985367,0.00020677532,0.0000417756,0.000048743,0.00064501143,0.00052093633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011985542,0.0006451556,0.0005799927,0.0022266898,0.026994426,0.010692738,0.0020098342,0.005147016,0.03166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003228942,0.0005595365,0.00052706705,0.004249953,0.008372607,0.0018851551,0.0034747664,0.00817974,0.0018413004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000092234495,0.00002550852,0.0005609986,0.000057436508,0.000006729955,0.0001715228,0.005251516,0.00042140295,0.000048616108,0.8019319,0.16377813,0.02773702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064828228,0.000004568323,0.0013462354,0.00020929333,0.000007919986,0.00005229919,0.0039615254,0.00020925482,0.00006368864,0.019393774,0.974724,0.000020997819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99814963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19033799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19033799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35909566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9390932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391481250","doi":"10.1111/jlse.12146","title":"Artificial Intelligence: The Future of Pedagogy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Studies Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Narrative; Focus (optics); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09088942209647546,"score_gpt":0.5082015189304274,"score_spread":0.417312096833952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391481250","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070449426,0.16071203,0.023678748,0.6284089,0.0031052693,0.000050155904,0.000051560928,0.00020361396,0.17674473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7074023,0.16818637,0.038350217,0.04623866,0.007541533,0.00041377664,0.00008940968,0.00015325053,0.03162445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918007,0.006214217,0.00018700032,0.00042857675,0.0010184416,0.00035096047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764431,0.01896479,0.0006629005,0.0012732617,0.0014269766,0.00122894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014720182,0.00061580667,0.0008019269,0.002867895,0.0033531187,0.015230524,0.0016498774,0.0060712346,0.009741858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014354642,0.0002975179,0.00044684752,0.001655509,0.031490847,0.017305423,0.005025375,0.008720732,0.0014910068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012208441,0.000039649694,0.0002905273,0.00020488712,0.0000062140075,0.000027486863,0.001856475,0.0004279956,0.000063072635,0.9462558,0.007831937,0.042983737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010305883,0.000018885843,0.00023222684,0.0007255979,0.0000033275332,0.000044500768,0.0023527797,0.0007931629,0.00007623454,0.85526067,0.14046875,0.0000136223825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003130428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028382582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015230524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008057729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009621577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07784873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391548379","doi":"10.4000/cjm.2356","title":"About the book: American Legal Education Abroad: Critical Histories, New York University Press, 2021","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers Jean Moulin","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"History; Media studies; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.029884026147714418,"score_gpt":0.3513503130377229,"score_spread":0.3214662868900085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391548379","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012385866,0.43926585,0.000599329,0.2006188,0.013932742,0.00003547844,0.0005313276,0.00014634723,0.34363157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020666234,0.19422653,0.0006395657,0.03415627,0.0078109116,0.00014082278,0.0005758666,0.00021479996,0.74156904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964285,0.00010975242,0.000019823518,0.00003688691,0.00015258175,0.000038238064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896336,0.0005403249,0.000081602855,0.000038218954,0.00020335166,0.00017313192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074712245,0.00073012616,0.0003391058,0.0024249544,0.0040294207,0.005224691,0.0007557573,0.003028153,0.062301077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026120848,0.0004297577,0.000176245,0.0041680625,0.002960096,0.007867917,0.0014018667,0.0039033678,0.014463728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004421302,0.000009210759,0.00009493344,0.00009004764,0.0000010835599,0.0000382617,0.0011959366,0.000021983606,0.000027755104,0.02359346,0.95398784,0.020935051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016133378,0.000001252904,0.0003127528,0.00027930687,8.259705e-7,0.000033368124,0.0010147203,0.000012408341,0.000014407633,0.004367882,0.99395823,0.000003191126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024342157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061983097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062301077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042901468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004883396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20841783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391689434","doi":"10.51644/9781554581368-002","title":"Introduction","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.09573603254790712,"score_gpt":0.40748228110042256,"score_spread":0.3117462485525154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391689434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00072356325,0.0048149694,0.0010576922,0.0039657014,0.0018812387,0.000048297363,0.00059323886,0.00018490644,0.98673046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039943093,0.002704058,0.00046205422,0.0011559885,0.0002817728,0.00002140743,0.0003825951,0.00007597457,0.9909219],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937063,0.00005692243,0.000019769437,0.00015730057,0.00029183124,0.00010348609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930155,0.000079275465,0.000026391217,0.0000687589,0.00035250932,0.00017148325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004543027,0.0006112532,0.00040668473,0.0011124935,0.0034020548,0.005859908,0.0012922604,0.00244789,0.333547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001538919,0.0002595534,0.00029895466,0.0014506109,0.0013466598,0.0026670191,0.0020673976,0.0020302518,0.17383963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017387463,0.000031338026,0.0003727651,0.00018857696,0.0000022769748,0.00015083005,0.0011964552,0.000087613334,0.00021177503,0.09458332,0.7481442,0.15501344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.787537e-7,0.0000027415108,0.00013014187,0.00006652589,4.7224515e-7,0.00005435618,0.00013501148,0.00000847021,0.000025159306,0.0016692255,0.99790585,0.000001474103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028370814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0588272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.666453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042089694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042779204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95061433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391864576","doi":"10.51644/9780889205796-001","title":"Acknowledgements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06413564997133032,"score_gpt":0.38128741600876764,"score_spread":0.31715176603743733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391864576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005823072,0.012250714,0.020818816,0.1396966,0.09671124,0.0016081373,0.027121356,0.0024871277,0.69348294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022717303,0.0045442567,0.01116774,0.018571548,0.008810943,0.0012709042,0.013059767,0.0017050382,0.9181526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930397,0.0013422997,0.00034871238,0.0006523381,0.0042858375,0.00033106338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96318376,0.0039262716,0.0011724347,0.002200845,0.025279589,0.004237117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045268843,0.00083437713,0.00085564016,0.0026190432,0.0022409577,0.0029603182,0.0024396053,0.0010825797,0.23335676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037342004,0.00027049103,0.0005209657,0.0017330346,0.0009247022,0.0023650166,0.003629011,0.0032391532,0.13584298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036236328,0.000022790542,0.00035093247,0.00016837491,0.0000050375484,0.00020058901,0.0010955705,0.00007551838,0.00038167814,0.011395424,0.9489851,0.037282754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004545685,0.0000074572017,0.000389051,0.00013437585,0.0000027151837,0.00017348562,0.0006464675,0.000041516483,0.00008341255,0.002085077,0.9964258,0.000006260471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006005628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007196172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7666432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032976514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00482768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7806561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391870170","doi":"10.51644/9780889209022","title":"Doing Ethics in a Pluralistic World","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.16039589387453212,"score_gpt":0.442063088430732,"score_spread":0.2816671945561999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391870170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043692267,0.014753996,0.0073761726,0.04268247,0.003130726,0.000041838884,0.000022113853,0.000068444824,0.927555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18752576,0.010715454,0.0083998265,0.016245073,0.0023365149,0.00017406332,0.00007068356,0.00020921825,0.7743234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985261,0.0008061012,0.00003062013,0.00010097607,0.00044153645,0.000094757415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986695,0.00071162445,0.00007254313,0.00013240315,0.0002429945,0.00017099701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016025443,0.00044406552,0.00024684894,0.0006072434,0.0044649364,0.0054694614,0.00040488172,0.0014956156,0.0032802161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017057364,0.00015689287,0.00018790847,0.0006194539,0.012798962,0.0050929687,0.0016681817,0.003957008,0.0008982281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024825354,0.000012688653,0.00007176556,0.000042541913,0.000002164672,0.00006705765,0.014025351,0.00011260811,0.00013943411,0.87214637,0.09882849,0.014549009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016653191,0.000005507324,0.0001428733,0.00012555992,9.1029534e-7,0.00010412242,0.003508384,0.00007482068,0.00005874507,0.11560335,0.8803699,0.000004156167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034271032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011060446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054694614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038467715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031484668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027910352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391935746","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-95352-2_101-1","title":"Limits of Consent Education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.13035408207445856,"score_gpt":0.4357227866533086,"score_spread":0.30536870457885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391935746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015033131,0.0022665486,0.00823512,0.013098527,0.0003338062,0.000037332342,0.000027497075,0.00003198465,0.9744658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31408322,0.0035075617,0.0062882137,0.016377062,0.0009854472,0.0006224875,0.00009166611,0.00022583253,0.6578185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863647,0.0065374216,0.00039465286,0.001573189,0.003931289,0.0011987754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854897,0.010626304,0.0003623058,0.0018803626,0.0011738215,0.000467398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010831653,0.0008176811,0.0010783334,0.001426995,0.006078176,0.012893706,0.0026566074,0.010244496,0.024705326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030215096,0.0008514163,0.0006326006,0.0009729498,0.037456278,0.016852932,0.008502114,0.017545803,0.0047584665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017399842,0.0000055218484,0.000012272987,0.000006832503,5.0607605e-7,0.000008103343,0.0003303822,0.00004402034,0.00001049595,0.99319154,0.0036980573,0.0026905248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033358306,0.000003591221,0.00003139225,0.00009056506,0.0000017208122,0.000034262426,0.0002841773,0.0001881528,0.00008551539,0.9296634,0.06960851,0.000005387448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007533185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007962387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024705326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010438189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008880135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0826475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391966643","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_98","title":"Supporting Students with Academic Integrity and Ethical Learning: Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Engineering","score_opus":0.04281682798544876,"score_gpt":0.4437091302942884,"score_spread":0.4008923023088396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391966643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002993043,0.18282442,0.023949852,0.059019383,0.024399856,0.00040133722,0.00045854822,0.00056659075,0.70538694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01643067,0.123345494,0.01419953,0.0205623,0.009315463,0.0004847581,0.0004535677,0.00030178673,0.81490636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965703,0.00008072555,0.000020614925,0.000052651343,0.00013910278,0.000049927505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994253,0.00022227204,0.00003182107,0.000021964968,0.00016932382,0.00012941592],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006578386,0.0008723426,0.00048553266,0.001057425,0.0014540801,0.003953039,0.0010485622,0.0035993045,0.032925706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012537744,0.0003844383,0.00041881925,0.0011653611,0.0018122896,0.004543635,0.0029568048,0.0041229916,0.01219905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013318764,0.0002449094,0.00019440263,0.00076976244,0.0000037339594,0.00013555515,0.0026706182,0.00037973354,0.0006310159,0.14745156,0.6109537,0.23655176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025470433,0.000026489974,0.00023333365,0.00060186314,0.0000012974123,0.00011270244,0.00051779347,0.000072455594,0.00008746724,0.023390943,0.97494555,0.0000074621125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017475211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055136806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016603471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034745422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11014742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391977452","doi":"10.51644/9781554581641-003","title":"Acknowledgements","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Materials science","score_opus":0.07675563662728019,"score_gpt":0.39804449328323727,"score_spread":0.3212888566559571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391977452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025652065,0.00548469,0.017005557,0.08434649,0.059220713,0.0006772362,0.030168034,0.004023566,0.79650855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007906953,0.0017431516,0.005453451,0.0081739025,0.0031181907,0.00033944196,0.010508275,0.001365588,0.96139103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718815,0.0005503501,0.00015323446,0.00044540793,0.001411207,0.00025170442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878445,0.0016046327,0.00047055786,0.0012273123,0.006466837,0.0023861409],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031905533,0.00086910033,0.0006198549,0.0020547768,0.0018753222,0.003157396,0.0016877908,0.0012833145,0.46701285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018699665,0.00029139617,0.0003940971,0.0016618195,0.00044200188,0.0026277094,0.004036212,0.0018718017,0.25540802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021964679,0.0000070693923,0.00016856017,0.000054946253,0.0000019719444,0.000058144273,0.00014969936,0.00003599441,0.00012600338,0.0089301905,0.9556287,0.03481676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027747253,0.0000021806482,0.00013671431,0.000036956666,0.0000011532806,0.000044807985,0.000086864944,0.000034374807,0.000034808643,0.00085480034,0.99876225,0.0000023198781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067526735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011178859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5329871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002478855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00380093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76024145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391984272","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_129","title":"Enabling Ableism: Using Academic Integrity Arguments to Create Disability in Testing Environments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Ableism; Academic integrity; Normative; Misconduct; Cheating; Psychology; Scrutiny; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.13683839216959923,"score_gpt":0.42481589723624114,"score_spread":0.2879775050666419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391984272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011654133,0.0009097522,0.06022475,0.028925365,0.00045114197,0.000049086135,0.00004553727,0.00022166343,0.89751846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80234206,0.0011683223,0.030250035,0.0062109125,0.00032347458,0.0001907492,0.000071214854,0.00035276424,0.15909046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933648,0.003783637,0.00020105824,0.00041398007,0.001482794,0.00075371575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865672,0.0099740885,0.0004952137,0.0014057809,0.00092242693,0.0006352957],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007932405,0.00059866055,0.00037965283,0.0012435858,0.003629363,0.012179782,0.0023322492,0.005790603,0.017807016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0239284,0.00043875058,0.00067348155,0.000851594,0.022074739,0.018427745,0.010686168,0.007896712,0.002221309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037670397,0.000011934398,0.00008807996,0.000014208026,0.0000014235388,0.00006000331,0.0022180744,0.00017042128,0.000047147336,0.9876935,0.0035277458,0.0061636623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008679247,0.000010250595,0.00012032345,0.00013255537,0.0000066947696,0.00013503658,0.0019479725,0.00074494065,0.0004338482,0.9222239,0.074222416,0.0000134428865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023354737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030521788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032127437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004596806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059570372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392544398","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.127563.2","title":"The transparency of quantitative empirical legal research published in highly ranked law journals (2018–2020): an observational study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; University of Sydney; University of Washington; Boston University","keywords":"Open peer review; Plant biology; Observational study; Transparency (behavior); Medicine; Law; Physiology; Political science; Biology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.7599475830901874,"score_gpt":0.6606344309967526,"score_spread":0.09931315209343483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392544398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98597497,0.0039574252,0.0013378453,0.001575686,0.00005147929,0.0006618893,0.0039970367,0.0000321882,0.0024115492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99575704,0.0007727606,0.001020495,0.00040622964,0.000095871386,0.0005247235,0.0011552083,0.000031914016,0.00023559283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8604936,0.053872574,0.041661415,0.0077031516,0.032405756,0.0038634914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19232924,0.4351204,0.2901083,0.019959886,0.055542774,0.0069394037],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.097925976,0.00039117696,0.0012831038,0.018316755,0.0025338684,0.007697748,0.0021261787,0.0017602653,0.004474833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48113814,0.000990827,0.0011539079,0.01816016,0.004375306,0.008783803,0.0046119927,0.0024185588,0.0011951084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000519971,0.00041660565,0.95401704,0.002415642,0.00043371803,0.00042633264,0.025257606,0.00012352891,0.00022685176,0.00084403483,0.0022687921,0.01305001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001286065,0.00065320433,0.94128513,0.0036906886,0.00046772984,0.0019024265,0.037702926,0.0011744632,0.00083189004,0.0012794146,0.01071974,0.00016381941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00484877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005677758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90207404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037770334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005535107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51788825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393032379","doi":"10.55016/ojs/ajer.v70i1.78940","title":"AJER at 70: Looking Back, Looking Forward","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.11641097436024915,"score_gpt":0.4960558993751016,"score_spread":0.3796449250148524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393032379","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040114715,0.023338107,0.00047244513,0.3272789,0.61490035,0.000057501366,0.00022572407,0.00073184766,0.032593884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062630353,0.04231631,0.0027627838,0.34359342,0.36052474,0.00012501205,0.00058186066,0.0017788752,0.24205405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843998,0.0018406315,0.00081892835,0.0008919381,0.0096740285,0.002374602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90455854,0.006082722,0.0029409311,0.0018922061,0.04722204,0.037303604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018547911,0.0012022795,0.0015398124,0.004774701,0.009665131,0.029896688,0.00281604,0.010837478,0.083832525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05713874,0.0008759375,0.0013140155,0.0034022406,0.0054548983,0.0178343,0.0069698463,0.012531094,0.097627945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011787764,0.00000940084,0.00010295645,0.00009256078,0.0000020229918,0.000054222633,0.00017696248,0.000004243348,0.000064058695,0.0010431223,0.98645824,0.011980324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003837318,0.000011689312,0.000296813,0.0002721946,0.0000034857806,0.00011646666,0.0005801444,0.0000066411126,0.00003602729,0.0006789088,0.99797624,0.000017609864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019051488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05154433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083832525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075410292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03130637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28044778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393103194","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2024.2.004","title":"Factors affecting legal services' quality: The case of an emerging economy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Science Letters","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Business; Industrial organization; Economy; Economics","score_opus":0.10257499020133197,"score_gpt":0.47810169685797765,"score_spread":0.37552670665664567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393103194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916611,0.00014729374,0.00015866505,0.002065003,0.0000052217674,0.000034211418,0.00005256996,0.0000013926804,0.005874604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991936,0.00021782678,0.00009378411,0.000085821644,0.0000043879145,0.0000070585634,0.000026222744,0.0000010438065,0.0003702545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893004,0.00043680047,0.000036195644,0.00004814229,0.00012652343,0.0004223832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956117,0.0018115048,0.0008856453,0.00008918631,0.00069748913,0.0009044663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017066549,0.00015618,0.0002486413,0.0014263741,0.0029939518,0.0033051153,0.0006160564,0.00077110104,0.0026479885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00405512,0.00013662927,0.0003456107,0.0022351034,0.0016938823,0.0016172349,0.0015554493,0.0014106454,0.00013165789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013054874,0.0010556972,0.8420145,0.00020643,0.00008112444,0.024991134,0.07080944,0.0023466235,0.00043607556,0.035795424,0.003076404,0.019056622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004295195,0.00014977713,0.5029803,0.00023263179,0.00007407388,0.0014889209,0.4720328,0.008533751,0.00032676963,0.0035508722,0.010544132,0.00004301881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20708849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22156578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20708849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075755236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005276937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41176617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393860481","doi":"10.32920/22492903","title":"Open Your Eyes: Teaching and Learning about Anti-Asian Racism and the Law in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Law; Political science; Sociology; History; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.043321786593061504,"score_gpt":0.3979782104216819,"score_spread":0.3546564238286204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393860481","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23063132,0.0151575785,0.0019861665,0.53289926,0.003478757,0.0003299097,0.00022992017,0.00021629086,0.21507071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85704315,0.010735712,0.0027088043,0.049967725,0.00028993085,0.00011411584,0.00010373772,0.00015075336,0.07888602],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913623,0.0019579304,0.00013414126,0.0005553736,0.0025748552,0.0034154584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837114,0.002109895,0.0005502872,0.0001935889,0.0047153067,0.008719388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005957123,0.00063079,0.00056363555,0.0017922403,0.07298382,0.012257885,0.004449862,0.0050997213,0.008413384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010463658,0.0005032401,0.00058528857,0.002146271,0.02258195,0.0043057185,0.008015288,0.010670361,0.00079723605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005499777,0.0004268402,0.014605378,0.00032586796,0.000037769903,0.0019453864,0.57378376,0.00063313363,0.0010411498,0.047000133,0.2561334,0.10401224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014976241,0.0000643472,0.011133782,0.00051505194,0.00003344015,0.0003075505,0.6058644,0.0005236684,0.0006429166,0.0072219023,0.37355548,0.00012251337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99751186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19444932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19444932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4166045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9343246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393860482","doi":"10.32920/22492903.v1","title":"Open Your Eyes: Teaching and Learning about Anti-Asian Racism and the Law in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Law; Anti-racism; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.043321786593061504,"score_gpt":0.3979782104216819,"score_spread":0.3546564238286204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393860482","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23063132,0.0151575785,0.0019861665,0.53289926,0.003478757,0.0003299097,0.00022992017,0.00021629086,0.21507071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85704315,0.010735712,0.0027088043,0.049967725,0.00028993085,0.00011411584,0.00010373772,0.00015075336,0.07888602],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913623,0.0019579304,0.00013414126,0.0005553736,0.0025748552,0.0034154584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837114,0.002109895,0.0005502872,0.0001935889,0.0047153067,0.008719388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005957123,0.00063079,0.00056363555,0.0017922403,0.07298382,0.012257885,0.004449862,0.0050997213,0.008413384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010463658,0.0005032401,0.00058528857,0.002146271,0.02258195,0.0043057185,0.008015288,0.010670361,0.00079723605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005499777,0.0004268402,0.014605378,0.00032586796,0.000037769903,0.0019453864,0.57378376,0.00063313363,0.0010411498,0.047000133,0.2561334,0.10401224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014976241,0.0000643472,0.011133782,0.00051505194,0.00003344015,0.0003075505,0.6058644,0.0005236684,0.0006429166,0.0072219023,0.37355548,0.00012251337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99751186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19444932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19444932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4166045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9343246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059229","doi":"10.29173/alr2714","title":"Legal Ethics for Government Lawyers: Confronting Doctrinal Gaps","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10414733711804404,"score_gpt":0.434770047063153,"score_spread":0.33062270994510895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059229","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0085541075,0.054205157,0.0070594847,0.87055665,0.0010137707,0.000027148491,0.00001566318,0.000027212622,0.058540814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75073564,0.0707545,0.013852708,0.15294999,0.0023399463,0.00013582919,0.00004346142,0.00006367813,0.00912422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95945567,0.023437671,0.0012211261,0.001621788,0.010306555,0.0039572567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9367775,0.04118274,0.0029622433,0.001734451,0.012950269,0.004392903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04675517,0.00045669015,0.0010865213,0.0045235204,0.015644941,0.01664326,0.0039268765,0.011321934,0.003180619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06091981,0.0005171297,0.0003866354,0.0039468575,0.0740777,0.0120673925,0.008353515,0.019218205,0.0005136739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035985931,0.000021889491,0.00024218799,0.00018212399,0.0000040158607,0.00007227898,0.009744301,0.00016837018,0.000056272842,0.9578243,0.009407128,0.022273578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014231347,0.000015451904,0.0014193467,0.0018561471,0.00000953265,0.0001331996,0.031897027,0.0004343886,0.00010602689,0.78456736,0.17952031,0.000027086264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26741636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4059013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26741636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07274081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1667003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5317197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059323","doi":"10.29173/alr2697","title":"Dale Gibson: Scholar, Teacher, Lawyer, and Man of Principle","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04588072467313318,"score_gpt":0.39881674564932956,"score_spread":0.35293602097619636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059323","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021246637,0.11857659,0.0007425014,0.7838787,0.0077415085,0.000033204644,0.00003496139,0.00007275484,0.08679514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1668608,0.07473218,0.0023477697,0.48095328,0.0057269754,0.00015229646,0.00005152346,0.00019296118,0.2689822],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912629,0.0038942771,0.00023991453,0.00083419733,0.0025566465,0.0012121015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98776686,0.0074260263,0.0005043506,0.00054858683,0.0020439643,0.0017102916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007736373,0.0004044975,0.0006950267,0.0017153103,0.012299842,0.013630096,0.0019196084,0.009755539,0.0065151216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025647307,0.0007069878,0.00024965682,0.001910927,0.021193184,0.0079231,0.0041056494,0.011610712,0.0016892223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072941834,0.000017960767,0.00018917354,0.0001198403,0.0000025492254,0.00020547306,0.014044185,0.000025626478,0.00007595765,0.20652619,0.7647919,0.013993839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003856284,0.0000059122603,0.00021215298,0.0002468149,0.0000018729969,0.000104569706,0.0057738223,0.00002168621,0.000040888117,0.009998849,0.9835791,0.000010481226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13523051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20337737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13523051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018598814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035718996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26888674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059325","doi":"10.29173/alr2707","title":"The Justice Crisis: The Cost and Value of Accessing Law, Trevor C.W. Farrow &amp; Lesley A. Jacobs, eds. (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2020)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Economics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.04616401634271939,"score_gpt":0.378125591943006,"score_spread":0.3319615756002866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059325","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010462818,0.6803435,0.00028361892,0.2728464,0.0028692111,0.0000121505855,0.00014810801,0.00003994493,0.042410742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035531424,0.9060227,0.00048695563,0.02493484,0.0033795428,0.000026605634,0.000179596,0.00004267789,0.029395677],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953637,0.0013483365,0.00011328837,0.00018377438,0.0022317965,0.00075905066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937218,0.002950855,0.00037342665,0.00016130783,0.0016132824,0.0011792935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039631776,0.00080634136,0.0008600283,0.0029063302,0.0049493313,0.01291328,0.0021378594,0.007959747,0.009758464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012650171,0.00061258936,0.00047804724,0.004378928,0.011654423,0.006849076,0.0032706624,0.006352111,0.002031886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018255101,0.000035612768,0.0007896073,0.00049594213,0.000020171878,0.00013926708,0.0011261131,0.00030561877,0.00005520297,0.04650423,0.8234811,0.12702894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001463788,0.000023929011,0.0083386125,0.0041403277,0.0000466469,0.0004025859,0.01040259,0.00045001393,0.00013426936,0.0713531,0.90464395,0.000049331946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46809047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.702703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46809047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02927749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059147753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9307318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395462345","doi":"10.31542/2w47ja34","title":"Gender Roles in Corrections: How Gendered Expectations Impact Female Correctional Officers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MacEwan University Student eJournal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Criminology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05210980819008947,"score_gpt":0.3830669477615962,"score_spread":0.33095713957150674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395462345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97609216,0.0006714724,0.00025104897,0.007972912,0.00014885711,0.00003584423,0.000059588034,0.000009011646,0.014759114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99635977,0.00034037203,0.000044619785,0.00042724516,0.00002196446,0.000016998656,0.000013942926,0.000008952522,0.0027661575],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908421,0.0048306473,0.00023724469,0.0005445973,0.0015546829,0.0019906955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850632,0.0054405327,0.0026079626,0.0002737236,0.0028807726,0.003733818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051831882,0.0005157413,0.0003990067,0.0013963379,0.014279033,0.008576366,0.001216139,0.0012496017,0.008073431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023344442,0.00038947482,0.00033279302,0.0009795425,0.007286118,0.004192928,0.004633862,0.002269691,0.000888537],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011014498,0.00015079376,0.09341354,0.000094931806,0.00001297411,0.0010155856,0.88533545,0.00005102442,0.00042891726,0.0030492756,0.0037209846,0.012616351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026787873,0.000049894767,0.026208574,0.00009413972,0.0000047983535,0.00017858941,0.9674791,0.000045814795,0.00009411871,0.00023039027,0.0055947667,0.000017076854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.112075366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14570183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112075366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010319227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008696861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22284603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396537686","doi":"10.1515/9782763716992-007","title":"De la judiciarisation à l’innovation : la Coalition des intervenantes et intervenants francophones de l’Ontario pour le secteur de la justice","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05150422054257271,"score_gpt":0.37046392143516976,"score_spread":0.31895970089259706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396537686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040767413,0.024898011,0.003412285,0.21620493,0.0032698975,0.00018701513,0.00028560957,0.00006419401,0.7109108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37700412,0.0088744,0.0025037313,0.013338814,0.0005151268,0.00013182186,0.00017330315,0.000051669263,0.597407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949477,0.0007952944,0.00008112536,0.0003968855,0.0021307068,0.0016483654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684924,0.0007537579,0.00017031476,0.00014247902,0.00096618984,0.0011180338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039460985,0.00036644578,0.00034645683,0.00089057506,0.015856333,0.0051053013,0.001106155,0.0044842935,0.0064133457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004092001,0.00028185855,0.00035714015,0.0016680309,0.011866665,0.0016420659,0.0029421076,0.0042938637,0.00063393207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002755437,0.00003636785,0.003155702,0.00016682466,0.000013314654,0.0003629279,0.060928117,0.00029539908,0.00048062936,0.6480329,0.23632069,0.05017968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000998542,0.000014416339,0.007352564,0.00020685821,0.000007852333,0.000079829246,0.0071452097,0.00013045987,0.0001610863,0.008994708,0.97587764,0.00001949727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92147076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96756035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07852924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07638553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18877703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5542184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396716094","doi":"10.29173/mlj1109","title":"The Mens Rea of Sexual Assault: How Jury Instructions are Getting it Wrong","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Algoma University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Sexual assault; Jury; Criminology; Jury instructions; Psychology; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.04124937606386976,"score_gpt":0.3316040854850949,"score_spread":0.29035470942122515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396716094","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11276756,0.039990876,0.008393468,0.6970858,0.004833317,0.00011358604,0.0002379853,0.0002298715,0.13634759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83741575,0.037968136,0.0060577462,0.082349375,0.0018546898,0.00013328344,0.00018285327,0.0004943038,0.033543803],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828152,0.011024897,0.00044440082,0.00062908285,0.0037903038,0.0012961193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96259075,0.02262841,0.0027164428,0.0012382441,0.007493954,0.0033321646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01562572,0.00047793976,0.00071250537,0.003478021,0.009919264,0.013836802,0.002384382,0.010109771,0.009219905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07330074,0.001054015,0.00061001413,0.002818777,0.023192506,0.008601321,0.0046453523,0.009726808,0.0013873344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021405682,0.00068027375,0.06852327,0.0010866743,0.00031682797,0.0023229078,0.18318759,0.0014288545,0.0015351622,0.17938614,0.18067305,0.38064513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001286136,0.00024208514,0.09905986,0.0047634533,0.00032507963,0.003071221,0.2462482,0.0019034133,0.0017226996,0.19410527,0.4479253,0.0005047605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2329467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34485182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2329467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015317987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039037835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4631816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396716382","doi":"10.29173/mlj959","title":"The Admissions and Education Committee: A Perspective on Legal Education and Admission to Practice in the Province of Manitoba, Past, Present and Future","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Legal education; Political science; Medical education; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.017290840663946667,"score_gpt":0.35903700455250254,"score_spread":0.3417461638885559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396716382","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18404922,0.00957727,0.00059248065,0.7428783,0.0016972839,0.00021442166,0.00027015863,0.000036971356,0.06068393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8562206,0.008205951,0.0013571789,0.07486257,0.0011291783,0.0002029754,0.00014506481,0.000044425597,0.057832047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98868304,0.0031788966,0.0003292534,0.00038015272,0.0014461234,0.0059824074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96715,0.0063281893,0.0014903027,0.00024658532,0.0045499047,0.02023509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072582103,0.0003690513,0.0005223697,0.0032132585,0.031980842,0.013903255,0.00452229,0.012465445,0.009138033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016143955,0.0009368093,0.0005287323,0.005630252,0.017204994,0.003263611,0.008359762,0.011601057,0.00046550253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012314295,0.0006817214,0.16100712,0.00049352733,0.000063936015,0.005028336,0.22054721,0.0015160753,0.0013849264,0.40292615,0.1418622,0.06436568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006493374,0.0001931465,0.1786836,0.0015928177,0.000037540107,0.00051749626,0.4543251,0.0011046196,0.0003474673,0.015775051,0.34716654,0.000191717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95232975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8906541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.109345935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4147083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.793364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396717232","doi":"10.29173/mlj976","title":"Reaching for Excellence: Evaluating Manitoba's Process for Issuing Judicial Authorizations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authorization; Excellence; Process (computing); Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.23816406842901627,"score_gpt":0.5081246659591494,"score_spread":0.26996059753013313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396717232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92691624,0.00023739482,0.0018980897,0.005851779,0.000060669907,0.0016001186,0.00029608575,0.000066438886,0.063073166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805516,0.00016590203,0.0066733155,0.0017657343,0.000018165209,0.0005852736,0.00020908476,0.000036631725,0.009994293],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96361625,0.014939126,0.0015705958,0.0017447552,0.01173481,0.006394316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7508478,0.14615226,0.014337411,0.00702209,0.06792083,0.01371958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06844276,0.0005938958,0.00068866287,0.0040127872,0.016849637,0.01649314,0.0044455295,0.005759684,0.0074159857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19492346,0.0007719351,0.0007763792,0.004127881,0.0072072763,0.005270303,0.007501991,0.004564363,0.0010000075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055513363,0.004308989,0.5363997,0.0007434685,0.00053417316,0.0022207028,0.06618338,0.023637159,0.0029772995,0.19825844,0.023730088,0.1354553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016534484,0.0064084665,0.6172833,0.0014566348,0.0010081197,0.00057144865,0.19030344,0.060754683,0.0072684013,0.033436656,0.07931151,0.0005439305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73492956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8779237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26507044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06471856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18764277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53326297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396755463","doi":"10.61838/kman.isslp.2.4.6","title":"Legal Education and Social Responsibility: A Qualitative Inquiry into Law Students' Perspectives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Social responsibility; Legal education; Legal research; Sociology; Political science; Legal responsibility; Law; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.10388026298047592,"score_gpt":0.5486944565583513,"score_spread":0.4448141935778753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396755463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97774726,0.0010179675,0.0028652805,0.006972197,0.00013631,0.00018782564,0.00006632711,0.000021862179,0.010985005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942316,0.0007567703,0.0006318291,0.0010722303,0.000029493702,0.00015181226,0.000024122479,0.000019571753,0.003082583],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809848,0.014190592,0.00040358285,0.0008204684,0.001442476,0.0021580572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98413336,0.011267185,0.0010495168,0.00031227493,0.0011718315,0.0020657561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016607212,0.000695706,0.0012612446,0.002470789,0.013169378,0.009651411,0.0021601738,0.00292953,0.0030957668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017456628,0.0007672105,0.0005345591,0.0026576244,0.018604312,0.008017688,0.011411107,0.0056721587,0.0002849447],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007335722,0.000048778653,0.001478134,0.000043282107,0.0000021348962,0.00029162937,0.99245477,0.000022941485,0.00018498872,0.0028340942,0.0002098351,0.002422077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025917843,0.000022618204,0.00046466364,0.00007521433,0.0000017402392,0.00010574349,0.9918566,0.000057725945,0.000089183384,0.0005293602,0.0067884494,0.000006146556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007631849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010729011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016607212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061279456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007884943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0878284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784733","doi":"10.7202/1111193ar","title":"The Lawyer’s Professional Duty to Encourage Respect for—and to Improve—the Administration of Justice: Lessons from Failures by Attorneys General","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Duty; Administration (probate law); Administration of justice; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Professional responsibility; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.04560010974734654,"score_gpt":0.4368172844004749,"score_spread":0.3912171746531284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006309928,0.012623429,0.000563105,0.95639354,0.0010200449,0.000024454836,0.00002589274,0.000033510376,0.023006048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5501649,0.03229766,0.0025625965,0.34882402,0.0011938316,0.0002089406,0.00009396563,0.0002730281,0.06438101],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9471508,0.025078848,0.0018486807,0.00300533,0.011692928,0.011223471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8576408,0.07604867,0.006558792,0.008564947,0.02440233,0.02678438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052511595,0.00058466214,0.0010786195,0.0013465463,0.022216689,0.016139071,0.0038203003,0.021876613,0.0049926937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11059403,0.0011824083,0.00066296366,0.0016895811,0.06519026,0.018690515,0.013587109,0.03610211,0.0019598857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000680066,0.00014809988,0.0037487966,0.000657897,0.000045035176,0.00063383137,0.097938225,0.0003538894,0.0002503316,0.16367115,0.61629695,0.11618786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090806265,0.00018356336,0.0105035715,0.002818388,0.000059783855,0.0003352515,0.095362335,0.00015329542,0.0005942671,0.08699208,0.8027325,0.00017410751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4104443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5846146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4104443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038892932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18343359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8161105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396855248","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4822943","title":"Access to Justice and the Legal Profession: Three Questions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.033315377125860295,"score_gpt":0.4240276098035888,"score_spread":0.3907122326777285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396855248","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14274079,0.008033572,0.0013097997,0.72416264,0.000460594,0.00005983946,0.0002370835,0.000012040346,0.122983724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96575356,0.0031041666,0.00030935952,0.025518514,0.0010670059,0.000068566864,0.00005718255,0.000010522573,0.004111025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399066,0.002453545,0.00019492817,0.0005607887,0.0009870724,0.0018131188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9386904,0.043367192,0.0048414334,0.00097275374,0.0028061704,0.009322082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009349682,0.0002487933,0.0005956747,0.0019512037,0.0059052883,0.009569016,0.00286878,0.014482473,0.032233734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043390136,0.00036387442,0.00063524937,0.0028224022,0.0312415,0.021420702,0.010428052,0.008339468,0.0010252774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002532701,0.0010116977,0.047400095,0.0005952767,0.000058619535,0.0005521486,0.05604176,0.00021540101,0.00020772147,0.82330704,0.030945156,0.03941189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018362273,0.000106388085,0.06312548,0.0015846421,0.000050137944,0.0005997656,0.2260553,0.00037526543,0.00017762667,0.6337439,0.073905215,0.000092656715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026049955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022686992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032233734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006076848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01128981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10783261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396887557","doi":"10.29173/mlj932","title":"Preface","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.14650702160363455,"score_gpt":0.40119184782631145,"score_spread":0.2546848262226769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396887557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012579636,0.0035282075,0.001597077,0.016244233,0.037913162,0.0003565248,0.007752816,0.000517935,0.930832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004080821,0.0020978227,0.0008272194,0.0031685708,0.0035439064,0.00017193188,0.004683653,0.00026066374,0.9811654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992843,0.00009240836,0.000037352704,0.00011412052,0.00039186774,0.000079843296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971426,0.00034830318,0.000081747654,0.000224221,0.0018670077,0.0003361462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010743093,0.0005915544,0.00050854415,0.0021916744,0.004550689,0.0033276633,0.0014559459,0.0010578955,0.4190328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005257564,0.0003011149,0.00030880905,0.0024816971,0.0007665159,0.001761582,0.0017735217,0.0020704386,0.20723297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013223972,0.000009527796,0.00015715296,0.00006368717,7.743055e-7,0.00003645132,0.0002446014,0.000026479858,0.00008263296,0.0044501727,0.9704239,0.02449158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010641645,0.000003882757,0.00038379242,0.00007026867,3.6945173e-7,0.000021085467,0.00020047139,0.000011887322,0.000023346875,0.00049778976,0.9987841,0.000002014953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047727343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078408204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4190328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004845467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396887564","doi":"10.29173/mlj943","title":"Interview with Janet Baldwin","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.05922848863837579,"score_gpt":0.33852892575473514,"score_spread":0.2793004371163593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396887564","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026001133,0.0056716898,0.00047801834,0.92824924,0.005808884,0.00030722108,0.000483695,0.000090385474,0.032909654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1408205,0.0054111173,0.0009537168,0.7129939,0.0017124371,0.001252546,0.00022015226,0.00023225587,0.13640337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996813,0.0012214201,0.00014060261,0.0004666464,0.0006725577,0.00068577303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99026346,0.0022288691,0.000616055,0.0001699271,0.002447264,0.004274341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004066967,0.00070667325,0.0012031507,0.0013271088,0.015122161,0.004404749,0.0018147521,0.007318516,0.031450067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022285707,0.0012759459,0.0004636704,0.0016341973,0.003360018,0.005926837,0.003666106,0.020834673,0.0074827624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003459173,0.00009784595,0.0022195077,0.0001462076,0.000007115692,0.0028426636,0.0656895,0.00003523627,0.0004010888,0.001910284,0.919525,0.007090885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001982915,0.000047121564,0.0040864935,0.00047661085,0.000007708467,0.002207059,0.21494167,0.00009738474,0.00013407103,0.0007125534,0.7771984,0.0000711885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09153173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11614893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09153173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008433273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010012133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1819979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396887566","doi":"10.29173/mlj933","title":"Modern Legal Education: Towards Practice-Ready Attitudes, Attributes and Professionalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Mathematics education; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.08122609037982864,"score_gpt":0.4156439997433151,"score_spread":0.3344179093634865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396887566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72411674,0.0021735,0.005366385,0.08687088,0.00018247326,0.00009975584,0.000024775178,0.00006572057,0.18109977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802044,0.0008307132,0.0023207695,0.0035129993,0.00005102254,0.000021952264,0.0000121838575,0.000014044533,0.013031827],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954568,0.0020277193,0.00011882873,0.00026850658,0.0015195304,0.00060869934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916688,0.0019011523,0.0012853177,0.00042885193,0.0017389643,0.002976869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009136237,0.000127713,0.00011350139,0.0014532408,0.004525778,0.0079919975,0.00074259704,0.0020552971,0.0034729822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008192791,0.00020431181,0.00016718995,0.0008331609,0.018430796,0.004469778,0.007074245,0.003832143,0.00052068674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021681166,0.00046513675,0.07510619,0.00015465592,0.000007549986,0.0003291493,0.60528463,0.00016574068,0.0013144575,0.20359263,0.009672008,0.10388623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018585337,0.0002392854,0.088438466,0.0008475402,0.000010287455,0.0007176242,0.48176834,0.00082553376,0.0010237092,0.08067709,0.34537944,0.000054025044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017035117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030101804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017035117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008061557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015480737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05849099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396928990","doi":"10.29173/spectrum245","title":"Inspiring Repertoire for Enrichment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spectrum","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Repertoire; Computational biology; Biology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.04316405541703564,"score_gpt":0.41447628551527566,"score_spread":0.37131223009824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396928990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069395065,0.00694669,0.060206294,0.015824087,0.0012845576,0.00014285608,0.00014016515,0.0011255527,0.8449347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6125365,0.004482207,0.07910592,0.005254959,0.00060197164,0.00031093904,0.00030423581,0.0010603386,0.29634288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998936,0.00042776918,0.00002706001,0.00016650272,0.00029558,0.00014717263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922085,0.0002485093,0.000036010213,0.00017700033,0.00009234338,0.00022535078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010726623,0.0005137907,0.0003465979,0.0010512623,0.0035390514,0.0049020387,0.000989429,0.001373176,0.023297057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022116706,0.00022365486,0.00039554408,0.00046486707,0.006843331,0.0063760467,0.010454139,0.002179121,0.005263139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000163281,0.00015064573,0.001964241,0.0007830517,0.000018853278,0.0011207444,0.08925046,0.0005501749,0.014729393,0.6033194,0.04685587,0.24109384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015474598,0.00007764648,0.001009544,0.0003044368,0.000007880883,0.00090059865,0.014942591,0.00035039577,0.0017389168,0.08104552,0.8995863,0.000020748672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045196802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017043459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023297057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012963784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011213778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07793635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398470029","doi":"10.7910/dvn/d9vt8e","title":"Petition of Joseph Curtis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history","score_opus":0.036090899134186886,"score_gpt":0.35419572331732124,"score_spread":0.31810482418313435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398470029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012093396,0.007152497,0.0004770992,0.11581632,0.031720355,0.000110386194,0.0005267552,0.0004135491,0.84257376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004793329,0.00074438046,0.0001461505,0.028816655,0.0015793643,0.000049093098,0.00011426053,0.00018694911,0.96356976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551964,0.00044899934,0.00011751539,0.001095332,0.0018618105,0.0009566949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782217,0.000336605,0.00008228017,0.00022813398,0.00087271613,0.0006581136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022810672,0.0010055456,0.00093677803,0.0013159892,0.010031469,0.007034098,0.0019195225,0.008125235,0.19652039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009396899,0.000814919,0.0006796495,0.0009620154,0.0026201834,0.0030011798,0.004635657,0.011466673,0.09022291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013477398,0.0000059000927,0.00006357472,0.000017770664,0.0000016812472,0.000119662414,0.00013776212,0.000011996664,0.00007807536,0.011025858,0.98509395,0.0034303218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020716072,0.0000037130771,0.00012402724,0.000026245489,0.0000011336152,0.00003895993,0.00007837204,0.000009922458,0.000051694555,0.0003757242,0.9992842,0.000003997654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0490397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12479571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19652039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006293801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008108601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6574262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398603867","doi":"10.7910/dvn/6ftfx8","title":"Petition of John Smith","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.036042854037817006,"score_gpt":0.34975151223747175,"score_spread":0.31370865819965477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398603867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032769968,0.0034357572,0.00047068414,0.047457863,0.022808962,0.00013121143,0.00045075192,0.0002594706,0.92170835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006817967,0.00043633013,0.00014175268,0.0058027157,0.00082434685,0.000025597166,0.00008535563,0.00007877628,0.98578703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825567,0.0002034426,0.000047935846,0.0004598167,0.0005906833,0.0004423459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990884,0.00013347952,0.000037718983,0.0000891003,0.00025944665,0.00039186716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001074511,0.00077225297,0.00054197514,0.0009155208,0.008088021,0.004191021,0.0009702177,0.003789299,0.24491268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039670267,0.00056729646,0.0004934168,0.00058709516,0.0014839607,0.0020644432,0.0026291658,0.006761903,0.07672723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002776264,0.000014169333,0.00015008084,0.00002111172,0.0000025193733,0.00027523603,0.00016121159,0.000027361246,0.00015819407,0.012369573,0.9796769,0.0071159448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029622934,0.000009645637,0.00030751553,0.00003342007,0.0000016530943,0.00011532295,0.00016325268,0.000025176276,0.00013533825,0.00047244792,0.9987275,0.0000056622393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0189611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06354107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24491268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029430843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037102108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81931454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398762383","doi":"10.29173/mlj854","title":"ACCLE Conference Remarks - Integrating the Dimensions of Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Wildlife Federation","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.0367537016909045,"score_gpt":0.3466146636033609,"score_spread":0.3098609619124564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398762383","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006458477,0.0019584044,0.00017353718,0.93791103,0.014108844,0.000043790496,0.00015221589,0.000033498738,0.044972762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007715408,0.0007545782,0.00044296478,0.8918523,0.009638338,0.00015081435,0.00007954121,0.0000440555,0.08932196],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988204,0.0023629568,0.00043369873,0.0017799243,0.003989682,0.0032296646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800613,0.008434825,0.0004946175,0.0010533305,0.005417943,0.004537874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012185973,0.0011450513,0.00077402417,0.0012265512,0.020082451,0.024012093,0.004110302,0.08376386,0.028197223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025019884,0.0007514284,0.0017568618,0.001694721,0.008311285,0.009500801,0.0071916496,0.04668532,0.007971676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019847796,0.00003585584,0.00035438308,0.000053493208,0.0000052961254,0.00018139301,0.0006461663,0.000052967545,0.00011172145,0.025318265,0.9693588,0.0038617856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001905131,0.00001620989,0.0015998367,0.00018395131,0.000012450109,0.000070199276,0.001636139,0.00007794837,0.00017714279,0.003425237,0.9927321,0.00004976274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18127894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38551947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81872106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015449433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029159144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3604476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398762387","doi":"10.29173/mlj877","title":"An Interview with the Chief Justice of Manitoba Keynote","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Editor in chief; Management; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05026398914803384,"score_gpt":0.3419615573648961,"score_spread":0.29169756821686227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398762387","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2770432,0.0053219516,0.0012172649,0.64806396,0.0059453095,0.0007326978,0.00052116194,0.000056991074,0.06109744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49631876,0.002637724,0.0010042492,0.3250539,0.00066450634,0.00049329747,0.00010585344,0.000059146907,0.17366251],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622595,0.0010083512,0.00010682154,0.00030291584,0.00045449816,0.001901508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937689,0.0022882249,0.0003403351,0.00007130037,0.0014739912,0.0020572336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037141931,0.00055373914,0.00062166026,0.0016590758,0.06603725,0.007468967,0.0020629133,0.01353609,0.015568484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009096459,0.0010916969,0.00045251162,0.002216187,0.0059160446,0.0028100892,0.00458275,0.016833033,0.0012246473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008541149,0.0001325799,0.0101158945,0.00018423774,0.000017942448,0.01321959,0.80092573,0.000104034865,0.0020279482,0.012244998,0.15601568,0.0049260096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007685665,0.00002375994,0.0051239016,0.00017031038,0.000007650344,0.00049476087,0.7951404,0.00007049653,0.00027115108,0.00045858882,0.19819713,0.000034181536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6932822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85396576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3067178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038804453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04660421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61704826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398762526","doi":"10.29173/mlj859","title":"Judge Shadowing at the University of Manitoba &amp; Canada's First-Year Law Curriculum","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.023138423896431653,"score_gpt":0.2560430968810438,"score_spread":0.23290467298461218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398762526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06437434,0.0054508955,0.0010467975,0.5697762,0.006504017,0.0006391507,0.001146848,0.00039767358,0.35066405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11389273,0.0015591525,0.0009947899,0.052681506,0.00028225148,0.00013886445,0.00016036059,0.000098882665,0.83019155],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99528825,0.00030678877,0.00009507091,0.00039427937,0.0017626683,0.0021529603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843759,0.0015994079,0.00022413275,0.0001547964,0.0059408695,0.0077049015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035265188,0.00053610926,0.00057007116,0.001818151,0.052309424,0.009197273,0.002629996,0.009680839,0.044663165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009979372,0.00094969064,0.00046674328,0.0011692179,0.0044550896,0.0018184623,0.002517854,0.010787112,0.0034750141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044782882,0.0001298603,0.012915988,0.00010220048,0.000012147047,0.0007369077,0.004373721,0.0002336369,0.0006447828,0.04677256,0.914433,0.019600306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004596548,0.000069612026,0.03237617,0.0004483424,0.000026476431,0.000159592,0.01907247,0.00059837307,0.0012664847,0.0039266674,0.94192636,0.00008340436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96656466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074915215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074915215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30308443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5435505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398762545","doi":"10.29173/mlj870","title":"The Future for Canadian Law Schools","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02770027744032792,"score_gpt":0.32466472859957385,"score_spread":0.2969644511592459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398762545","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017016372,0.013692549,0.00062207854,0.82741565,0.0033471296,0.00007769425,0.00079246395,0.00020945782,0.1368266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51574445,0.0286371,0.006016629,0.15162466,0.0016915131,0.00023314479,0.0011268863,0.00023163222,0.2946939],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98975754,0.001070599,0.00016209441,0.00054575474,0.0023086793,0.0061552976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9640249,0.001245967,0.0005756175,0.00039995686,0.010586306,0.023167288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075544594,0.00080944377,0.0007322343,0.0040982864,0.039857604,0.019747574,0.0038917677,0.012296472,0.06791054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013781709,0.00059872784,0.0011402159,0.0053082183,0.012368147,0.00595033,0.0060654394,0.009723493,0.003516967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008009263,0.00015534522,0.009452779,0.0004450072,0.000032225944,0.00032086187,0.0072045736,0.00056582416,0.0002541986,0.2616924,0.6139686,0.105828024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004716373,0.000035815796,0.017018775,0.0010356476,0.00004089036,0.00008246833,0.021942953,0.0005091087,0.0001289678,0.020282345,0.9387845,0.000091446454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99774396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72469497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.275305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6595615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8405435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398763350","doi":"10.29173/mlj946","title":"Interview with Lee Stuesser","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.07249293675765017,"score_gpt":0.3569432075876293,"score_spread":0.28445027082997915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398763350","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02152166,0.0040822695,0.00028624322,0.92248714,0.0039918576,0.000084678155,0.0002576301,0.00006888509,0.047219723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08669476,0.0022107933,0.00028976612,0.81357545,0.00073723117,0.00024865931,0.000091202084,0.00008315448,0.09606902],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967451,0.0013292119,0.000099021316,0.0003534588,0.0006195393,0.0008536859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903272,0.0026772653,0.00046624494,0.00017246394,0.0020976793,0.004259258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043523405,0.0004945047,0.00057130505,0.0010808896,0.016409988,0.004359525,0.001267026,0.0070771887,0.028671747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017811462,0.0005628697,0.00034277528,0.0012550552,0.0045151734,0.0059842714,0.0031845686,0.017889911,0.0049395952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017245397,0.000051455452,0.0029478986,0.00007156258,0.0000041018598,0.001334842,0.054246794,0.00003137936,0.00019763698,0.005025903,0.9280002,0.008071075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009206552,0.000023775541,0.0033152208,0.00040243973,0.0000049508244,0.0009557728,0.17194334,0.0000912221,0.000136146,0.001237384,0.821829,0.00005151768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08875149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11749547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08875149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007633225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015072239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1764698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398763562","doi":"10.29173/mlj950","title":"Common Law Legal Education in Canada's Age of Light, Soap and Water","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"SOAP; Legal education; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01958590949617754,"score_gpt":0.3038333723539593,"score_spread":0.28424746285778174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398763562","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28823298,0.0059101135,0.0008771975,0.55759645,0.001183752,0.00011951253,0.00032705427,0.00011378935,0.1456392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7953572,0.004526826,0.0020767986,0.063054316,0.00018443009,0.0000655675,0.00010943808,0.0000885221,0.1345369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954887,0.00046720722,0.000080516,0.0003034229,0.0012566625,0.0024035862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792545,0.0025257084,0.00059880683,0.00018744149,0.0040113484,0.013422215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003335748,0.00025541958,0.00037341792,0.0014215587,0.049417112,0.00861846,0.0023573774,0.00649932,0.018057972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011065203,0.0005582495,0.00041886076,0.0020605715,0.01099589,0.0034831942,0.0056943507,0.010327158,0.0009995206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001266915,0.00072306464,0.05406778,0.00033019163,0.000035766025,0.0032421337,0.17912777,0.00073071703,0.0015974016,0.22584662,0.36614373,0.16802806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051228846,0.00008026822,0.063562155,0.00066160184,0.000027502063,0.00040001786,0.19865829,0.00061388116,0.00060512277,0.012313758,0.7229148,0.00011137764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99932694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16583331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16583331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.50558865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9675151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398770237","doi":"10.29173/mlj937","title":"Interview with Cameron Harvey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.07136191732873463,"score_gpt":0.3463402712592333,"score_spread":0.27497835393049863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398770237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009837645,0.005656101,0.00023531062,0.95215476,0.005691689,0.00010263581,0.00020770624,0.000050298433,0.026063895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1144874,0.0040978086,0.0003189107,0.7576283,0.0014196354,0.00043074778,0.000090124886,0.0001245916,0.121402405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639636,0.0016202756,0.00007436716,0.00039998256,0.00046373217,0.0010453506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98741597,0.004704668,0.00047827515,0.00017731919,0.0023192614,0.0049045742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005528098,0.00090613135,0.0009403663,0.001914131,0.023373775,0.005051867,0.0017400217,0.011430996,0.05318061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029432185,0.0007837289,0.00035094275,0.0024938735,0.007371933,0.0085127195,0.0040165703,0.021060497,0.0071066534],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004136679,0.000042156986,0.0014870077,0.000078609315,0.0000027452786,0.0015248131,0.059653245,0.000044793353,0.00019210609,0.0064393645,0.92291564,0.0075781117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015659,0.000028548735,0.0021612172,0.00042531264,0.000003206496,0.0005231914,0.19384852,0.00009319146,0.00009254598,0.0016493191,0.8011015,0.00005771426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20086789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19787832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20086789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015309115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014878291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39939743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399040456","doi":"10.29173/mlj751","title":"Finally a How-To Book For New Canadian Lawyers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0853993907542193,"score_gpt":0.3417156738794514,"score_spread":0.2563162831252321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399040456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002790579,0.016631847,0.002265056,0.16787744,0.040417578,0.00035996953,0.0014069123,0.00084890897,0.76740175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003749768,0.0020612194,0.00075029844,0.009871233,0.00094709307,0.00003519304,0.00014034615,0.0001172901,0.98232746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994073,0.000044722,0.000012024338,0.00003300041,0.0003197096,0.0001832408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815756,0.00021436467,0.000023444934,0.00006103133,0.0008545076,0.00068916584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007703185,0.0006932829,0.00038758307,0.0015399202,0.011924378,0.006403737,0.0013534693,0.004703738,0.102100596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002719459,0.0005215085,0.0006398561,0.0018051296,0.001683353,0.0024262746,0.0014140287,0.005074576,0.015907668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029469018,0.0000111395475,0.000097831944,0.0000140629445,6.572907e-7,0.00003429243,0.00014431679,0.0000373202,0.00004836727,0.0033384226,0.9853328,0.010937867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030495037,0.000003492574,0.00033631318,0.00002559579,0.0000016106654,0.000019893077,0.00047374258,0.00003306039,0.000025685116,0.0007202374,0.99835086,0.0000063938287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.860587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98237926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.139413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024644298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05413083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34156054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399040898","doi":"10.29173/mlj823","title":"Leveling the Playing Field: Severance and Access to Justice at the Manitoba Court of Appeal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Severance; Appeal; Economic Justice; Law; Field (mathematics); Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.09842009203479507,"score_gpt":0.39533428635498885,"score_spread":0.2969141943201938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399040898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8410705,0.0009422232,0.00055591034,0.041414984,0.000116630035,0.00010680549,0.00017603759,0.000028145527,0.11558887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736545,0.00040514802,0.00023804365,0.0036533023,0.000022231963,0.000023449318,0.00004653786,0.0000142767085,0.021942489],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967662,0.000580654,0.00007943592,0.0002026495,0.00057778327,0.0017931242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927779,0.0017154348,0.0006034896,0.0002120013,0.0016582453,0.0030328901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021475703,0.00019090944,0.00031291458,0.0013683334,0.025289997,0.00774524,0.002285908,0.00331298,0.021881118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017754119,0.0005135121,0.00017528168,0.0017158084,0.0053352867,0.0026300324,0.005181846,0.006052681,0.0010682752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047804057,0.0009078675,0.4479997,0.00013356187,0.00009294389,0.009066076,0.18789813,0.0010543395,0.0028109192,0.16536492,0.09242445,0.09176904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008186087,0.00022291447,0.3864419,0.00078903604,0.00011998873,0.0019784446,0.45114115,0.0022615418,0.0011707686,0.039607894,0.1160083,0.00017623094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8491159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.965009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15088409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02625337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.066971265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3035453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399041162","doi":"10.29173/mlj806","title":"Making the Transition from Lawyer to Lawyer-Politician in Canada: An Exploratory Study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Political science; Law; Exploratory research; Sociology; Chemistry; Social science","score_opus":0.1313090917444048,"score_gpt":0.38072611360165726,"score_spread":0.24941702185725245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399041162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98892874,0.00024429135,0.000101437494,0.004237179,0.00003421895,0.0001555085,0.00016941411,0.000004624407,0.006124624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930419,0.00034339735,0.00023105078,0.0015134165,0.0000108416,0.000069853624,0.000095906296,0.000011821571,0.0046818205],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923151,0.0015900449,0.00016446799,0.0006361099,0.0014982887,0.003796032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833698,0.0032574453,0.001639642,0.000240258,0.0044842316,0.0070085167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042108125,0.00032750936,0.0008420784,0.002379853,0.041483823,0.009353482,0.0040902155,0.0043285396,0.005381752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0156336,0.0009545607,0.00044947435,0.005403483,0.007459295,0.0030668965,0.004787736,0.007305848,0.00045078437],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002819356,0.0013176574,0.20667458,0.00014579471,0.00003735928,0.0012764598,0.75037533,0.00019932943,0.0009108277,0.008216593,0.0074408646,0.023123264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023967077,0.00008700104,0.101035215,0.00013708975,0.00002117424,0.00008035138,0.8841757,0.00029932676,0.0001587502,0.0003085514,0.013627285,0.000045650646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1573849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1573849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29637656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97731405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399061067","doi":"","title":"Ontario, listen up: Citational practices in the Ontario Court of Appeal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06053087046219204,"score_gpt":0.3358833500697974,"score_spread":0.2753524796076054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399061067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4869944,0.0061729494,0.0007681769,0.09775514,0.00090349803,0.00027202876,0.0013277951,0.00008841181,0.40571758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88716525,0.0025729896,0.00044773382,0.005203652,0.00024705575,0.00007957678,0.00021376244,0.0000946243,0.103975385],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885494,0.0014877723,0.0005961288,0.0007089079,0.0064427303,0.0022149272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9503759,0.020857368,0.003986132,0.001417957,0.01712284,0.0062398235],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008006952,0.00019311334,0.0004986778,0.005158184,0.03776727,0.011571285,0.002231478,0.0046999822,0.01690166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08266447,0.00051497674,0.00027562396,0.01060524,0.008318303,0.003024164,0.0049818135,0.0036145274,0.0009103037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022886983,0.00008012795,0.06427478,0.00046976877,0.00005263516,0.0038406127,0.5432858,0.0002880847,0.0011737847,0.08753503,0.20987472,0.08889587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003052737,0.000033752556,0.17683533,0.00057850033,0.00006732282,0.000571518,0.2769158,0.00037588095,0.0004225031,0.005387136,0.53863657,0.00014521148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9764016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99445623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10625051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1533651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.770905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399082793","doi":"10.29173/mlj953","title":"Excerpts from Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Canadian Bar Association Held at Winnipeg, Manitoba","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Library science; Bar (unit); History; Gerontology; Geography; Medicine; Psychology; Meteorology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021882381674789942,"score_gpt":0.2699327632651236,"score_spread":0.24805038159033366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399082793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030255781,0.013289607,0.0017241555,0.06486094,0.058289815,0.001534279,0.037509266,0.0002885995,0.7922476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021155937,0.0030614098,0.00096786843,0.0066102804,0.0024348423,0.00041881058,0.0042628376,0.00025312064,0.960835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924976,0.00011515955,0.000025255637,0.000053121596,0.00041503424,0.0001416149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813,0.0006908054,0.00007838349,0.00004413472,0.00083210017,0.00022461155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006378775,0.0010527737,0.0005271062,0.0030814458,0.0069455514,0.0022037756,0.0014800796,0.0015502777,0.09372649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003952399,0.00042734272,0.0002435494,0.0055699376,0.0009995464,0.00060076936,0.0010877278,0.0015638095,0.017176112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027932005,0.0000133318745,0.00013133329,0.00012521898,0.0000016195826,0.00014754347,0.002659214,0.000033453194,0.00035080206,0.0008423373,0.9895291,0.0061382097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008530308,0.0000052959113,0.0036835102,0.00009326549,0.0000016732531,0.000044185428,0.0045389035,0.000026073605,0.00010827821,0.00017417174,0.9913094,0.000006625144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4119158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80646616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058476925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004858856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81903636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399158051","doi":"10.1515/9780889779426-003","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Regina Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.06723774102350238,"score_gpt":0.2873177597681832,"score_spread":0.2200800187446808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399158051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044692398,0.0045501506,0.0014338152,0.0061397394,0.005239779,0.00007086727,0.0007637169,0.00033283074,0.98102206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002954836,0.0027646825,0.00078346377,0.0026762257,0.0008449841,0.000042874566,0.0006160648,0.00015315496,0.98916364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917585,0.000090369635,0.000032007378,0.00020604974,0.000384497,0.00011112317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925345,0.000121998186,0.000029404648,0.00009324054,0.00031476846,0.00018712803],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055616704,0.00070188136,0.00044745294,0.0011519733,0.0023591588,0.0053255833,0.0015100568,0.0026613888,0.47487018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021249289,0.00026414215,0.00042882055,0.0011528032,0.0012042595,0.004101834,0.002811178,0.0023510398,0.28777426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001447884,0.00002921291,0.00014925086,0.00014023547,0.0000014034438,0.00010526437,0.0005064291,0.000059976,0.0001872384,0.047902606,0.83409995,0.116803974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.817712e-7,0.0000034071222,0.000070912225,0.00006929407,3.156985e-7,0.000056712306,0.00008623292,0.000009486448,0.000022542941,0.0020781825,0.9976006,0.0000015815936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042512594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077651315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5251298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024779686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029293506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7490339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399201298","doi":"10.29173/wclawr114","title":"When Pleas Precede Evidence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal; Ontario Tech University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.13342610207671493,"score_gpt":0.45152483572721663,"score_spread":0.3180987336505017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399201298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71307373,0.008980297,0.051640045,0.04023463,0.002303169,0.0016074197,0.0027590692,0.0010428469,0.1783587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813137,0.00065975415,0.0047260355,0.004222346,0.00064232777,0.00047269007,0.00051866134,0.00007528227,0.0073692137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.967946,0.013320538,0.0029526465,0.00409561,0.007848853,0.0038363605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8135215,0.13670924,0.02590301,0.0135197155,0.0055826777,0.004763841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029405298,0.00064561144,0.0012189007,0.0026065612,0.0028986407,0.0058272174,0.0013003981,0.007191128,0.019656079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21564466,0.0009296914,0.0014950922,0.0016030915,0.0030197676,0.008546848,0.005893116,0.011024389,0.0032146273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012613109,0.0016503141,0.19083703,0.0015737935,0.0010815837,0.027218344,0.013146483,0.007931372,0.0054538976,0.36611554,0.07218877,0.30018967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005703057,0.0029496453,0.26258644,0.0021851049,0.00054837763,0.0171637,0.007466009,0.015052078,0.0063646263,0.49683437,0.18775414,0.0005252104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010090306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018128133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029405298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025024978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017696897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15551192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399451141","doi":"10.1108/s1479-354720240000015004","title":"From the Coleman Case to Disability Justice: An Examination of Discrimination by Association","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Economic Justice; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.05949295651322526,"score_gpt":0.39904601818751717,"score_spread":0.3395530616742919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399451141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0382694,0.009146545,0.00089145283,0.051202632,0.00043772452,0.000048822734,0.000035770743,0.000011537532,0.8999561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8632158,0.00800107,0.0006573543,0.035202626,0.0008211951,0.00013775741,0.0000483202,0.000051101564,0.09186474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562585,0.0018334928,0.00007673053,0.00029730413,0.001045497,0.00112117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951444,0.0036887964,0.0003144151,0.00016333902,0.00036565258,0.00032344487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035838136,0.00030722245,0.0004327497,0.003079507,0.012479187,0.0072370623,0.001319734,0.006154071,0.007593197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070606954,0.0004010941,0.00039762168,0.0022637134,0.023954598,0.0066111353,0.0063355737,0.008452035,0.0005046497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062823287,0.000015779091,0.00045980082,0.000033084292,0.000002484793,0.0007992728,0.011603416,0.00006562289,0.00004836776,0.9621622,0.020698432,0.0041053714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003514888,0.00004047788,0.004906569,0.0012985704,0.000023718052,0.0014238402,0.039337978,0.000568586,0.00033701968,0.24425313,0.7077164,0.000058548318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078459784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13749908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078459784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011747424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067743305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15600622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399635341","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4862423","title":"Reviewing the Legal Curriculum; Insulating Decolonizing Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04025329190328831,"score_gpt":0.375147046347194,"score_spread":0.3348937544439057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399635341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14064528,0.005620524,0.10260022,0.2697037,0.0046626697,0.0008812208,0.00024170805,0.00085568725,0.47478905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84493357,0.0030507005,0.04479801,0.034065023,0.0014043332,0.00046030525,0.00013454503,0.00045485096,0.0706987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98220396,0.008717235,0.0007511233,0.002032304,0.004932091,0.0013633422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93351936,0.027103376,0.005734721,0.006934931,0.022759981,0.003947709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017636472,0.00041492697,0.00056724815,0.0037575194,0.0064172274,0.0081336945,0.0024373946,0.00357225,0.006187648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07695846,0.00038652282,0.00038964843,0.0018664846,0.009522823,0.0066659725,0.006241652,0.0051787794,0.0013376399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032215896,0.00025578603,0.004545705,0.00043600137,0.000014786664,0.00026653297,0.021367036,0.0013460831,0.0018252131,0.6858563,0.055872653,0.22818178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006231117,0.00020617286,0.011224567,0.0015381747,0.00009865911,0.00031291638,0.026620543,0.0057818643,0.009966333,0.31998652,0.6241104,0.00009163981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012176993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026474683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017636472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00921889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032697603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09327173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400033339","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4872160","title":"Just Friends? Managers' Connections to Judges","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028452641686526302,"score_gpt":0.3848042118545272,"score_spread":0.3563515701680009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400033339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42944402,0.0013467278,0.0014102205,0.18000402,0.0014718664,0.00003091641,0.00007056107,0.00008987913,0.38613182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96337044,0.00026139434,0.00011827189,0.00759769,0.000241098,0.000016000928,0.000014287792,0.00003696018,0.028343854],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98668474,0.008219936,0.00021779024,0.0007738998,0.001823944,0.00227959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9482938,0.02248355,0.0060916706,0.0015385046,0.0046572313,0.016935209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058900723,0.00018262083,0.00038236787,0.0017137333,0.017423993,0.0122697735,0.0013471184,0.0044056247,0.028953772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07372272,0.0004637369,0.00015727631,0.0014306192,0.00770266,0.0087439995,0.0055055683,0.008275287,0.0025909645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009932762,0.00027257547,0.047030307,0.00006728571,0.000041868672,0.0025887906,0.5565637,0.0001168708,0.00035190364,0.15506762,0.18819131,0.04960853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041422365,0.00010845174,0.023866815,0.00020140987,0.00004135274,0.00077508035,0.5643471,0.00038430784,0.00027172666,0.044308018,0.36557993,0.0000744206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010426984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02665689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028953772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004417577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052713007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09685999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400074015","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714","title":"Ethics in Action","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.1387402024820857,"score_gpt":0.3685301943446637,"score_spread":0.229789991862578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400074015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006328149,0.008288161,0.010113949,0.043219466,0.0028629294,0.00013167517,0.00004557421,0.00010045568,0.9346051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09649152,0.011374116,0.02257337,0.032221243,0.0014620442,0.00056038186,0.00013523073,0.0002521217,0.83493006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892762,0.005877729,0.00030908934,0.0006396499,0.0031314513,0.0007658678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947573,0.0028379292,0.00024762368,0.00054800126,0.0010917452,0.0005175306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067570857,0.000978295,0.0005516867,0.0010595688,0.008510861,0.013016483,0.0014488768,0.0056482013,0.012517483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007849239,0.00044461852,0.00045782406,0.0008997935,0.039392345,0.006467769,0.0052753,0.00913001,0.0048708064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024885421,0.000006949308,0.000036761456,0.000061080566,0.0000018784555,0.000043025575,0.0054356526,0.000113654976,0.00004817901,0.9009012,0.08246786,0.010881241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027928736,0.0000035595301,0.000060709088,0.00027864406,0.0000010921937,0.0000665022,0.0023343626,0.00008349236,0.000044439912,0.15529193,0.8418269,0.0000055754676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020149013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032639775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020149013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0126614375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021377575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0918656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400074114","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-035","title":"4.6 Will Women Judges Really Make a Difference?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.036500431947484445,"score_gpt":0.26861616363250734,"score_spread":0.2321157316850229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400074114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043647513,0.008283332,0.0004440756,0.07719041,0.0020483853,0.000017521887,0.000039752405,0.000021959228,0.90758973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13418652,0.003919769,0.0003747641,0.038026873,0.0009876911,0.000055009394,0.000043023763,0.000073634015,0.8223327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752754,0.0010513931,0.000029391957,0.00019926617,0.0005502125,0.00064227975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911433,0.0003537409,0.000046195684,0.000040086117,0.00022949456,0.00021607637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020333235,0.00031703722,0.0002548358,0.00063718035,0.008925782,0.007996088,0.0007552796,0.003706374,0.02021466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003470158,0.00022115666,0.00026610796,0.00074201555,0.008454708,0.0048746336,0.0015597118,0.004140131,0.0058270134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000113213655,0.000023925104,0.0004873412,0.000044235287,0.0000023110445,0.00014124234,0.01332064,0.000026350615,0.00008665318,0.72722685,0.23775569,0.02087349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008654979,0.000013820793,0.0005836242,0.00016490112,0.000003984186,0.00007653535,0.011381363,0.00003643747,0.00009143707,0.04544686,0.942186,0.000006397497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030696943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084372826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030696943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007573721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076103513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06762475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400230632","doi":"10.35774/app2024.01.046","title":"Ethical principles of judges’ activity: Canadian experience","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aktual’ni problemi pravoznavstva","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.10161325328550269,"score_gpt":0.42509642246583385,"score_spread":0.32348316918033115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400230632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53468364,0.015277444,0.004306786,0.06440435,0.001464662,0.00032625828,0.00023304981,0.00009829478,0.37920552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96559614,0.0056227725,0.001221334,0.003974527,0.00009717985,0.000042302847,0.000059761125,0.000049865004,0.023336079],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747731,0.008457268,0.0006427231,0.00189347,0.008605944,0.005627464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96867675,0.012955966,0.0012094821,0.0006510542,0.009507074,0.0069996486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015846312,0.00070723885,0.00071612967,0.0022282922,0.04878216,0.011149574,0.0028632516,0.004932524,0.004160479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03432317,0.0006717632,0.0005494192,0.005763743,0.025000669,0.002374809,0.005144719,0.008173479,0.00032195423],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102827165,0.00019272392,0.008733655,0.0002612403,0.000022633154,0.0023650653,0.77020836,0.0007964535,0.0007957542,0.14786737,0.029254835,0.03939911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045532528,0.000105883475,0.014015347,0.00039942056,0.000029576215,0.0009047012,0.36011028,0.0007499356,0.000749581,0.0075208545,0.61517227,0.00019651708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.969257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9860531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1391471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1391471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17613457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400444530","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2024.12574symposium","title":"Dealing with the Aftermath of Critical Justice Events","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04386761184615806,"score_gpt":0.40758210244590126,"score_spread":0.3637144905997432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400444530","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14691602,0.01691286,0.010175539,0.6444035,0.026818462,0.0002628896,0.00009315221,0.00051751896,0.15390004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87022656,0.007575248,0.0025477163,0.08673278,0.012276982,0.0001605272,0.00008155926,0.00028129964,0.020117326],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890654,0.005625617,0.0003523874,0.00061900023,0.0018546699,0.002482857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96939945,0.012793021,0.004018535,0.0015240498,0.0040183184,0.00824667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010088934,0.00058719475,0.00052952085,0.0020885307,0.02805717,0.016102647,0.0021000856,0.010649883,0.006382004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053179406,0.00040253953,0.0006308883,0.0010784201,0.013509361,0.01073961,0.012867605,0.021462608,0.0010284837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014966149,0.00024247347,0.011389743,0.0005889524,0.00010122798,0.013892807,0.3705347,0.00054430636,0.0020790996,0.138062,0.32531828,0.13709672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020281648,0.00019496407,0.0066646114,0.0013171558,0.000030005081,0.0024022432,0.34818047,0.0003374336,0.0007731235,0.05641806,0.5835752,0.00008640602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003079236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077183843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02805717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057333144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008365942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05335605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400457089","doi":"10.5553/elr.000265","title":"Including the Forgotten Party in Legal Education: Victims of Crime","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Premise; Victimology; Presentation (obstetrics); Work (physics); Law; Criminology; Political science; Legal education; Legal profession; Psychology; Sexual abuse; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.10556451079887637,"score_gpt":0.46031927280052026,"score_spread":0.3547547620016439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400457089","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3039544,0.3066139,0.001484084,0.2528158,0.004370022,0.0005043051,0.00008710649,0.00006351211,0.13010688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7190998,0.23703213,0.0015364402,0.024083046,0.0011164491,0.00035602786,0.000078133424,0.00003739695,0.01666047],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913873,0.005652952,0.0003038842,0.0002794023,0.0011753656,0.0012011725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99183017,0.004340683,0.0009441737,0.0002717053,0.00095276494,0.0016604697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008805593,0.00022174596,0.0005747812,0.0015681769,0.0050707282,0.004256557,0.0012577561,0.0036671616,0.004992855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015339348,0.00028396485,0.00033099417,0.0017947229,0.0055646533,0.0047630053,0.0065617156,0.0041538742,0.0006027555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041443436,0.00073283137,0.00722683,0.008298194,0.000040760042,0.0013876637,0.24723259,0.00011552164,0.00040270019,0.0790683,0.07414322,0.58131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062540166,0.0004873526,0.02824769,0.016151704,0.00009134816,0.0028132773,0.3128463,0.00006110395,0.00043352877,0.008668971,0.63008755,0.000048578302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011887815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04069726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011887815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043447823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02664056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04656893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482627","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v3i1.70480","title":"Further Contemplations: Inaugural Canadian Symposium on Academic Integrity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.09590031357412092,"score_gpt":0.38401641284991117,"score_spread":0.28811609927579024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482627","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062707305,0.013606086,0.00027067657,0.9057301,0.072229944,0.000020488842,0.000041225627,0.00002619096,0.007448144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09857924,0.032567594,0.0021690344,0.7328344,0.057457626,0.00010152123,0.00014346419,0.00026750853,0.0758796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9598769,0.008001041,0.0010366238,0.002109045,0.019743752,0.009232643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9211965,0.011580618,0.0011967716,0.0014504455,0.034728575,0.029847031],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030474298,0.0011607939,0.001396977,0.0020134891,0.043645978,0.02434944,0.004332185,0.022711635,0.008336835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04550237,0.0008365473,0.0018322034,0.0021590022,0.02889035,0.008225526,0.008554739,0.04776937,0.0016223607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003535368,0.000013806056,0.00024684507,0.00011543465,0.000015748783,0.00025383648,0.0067624953,0.000050361556,0.00030161167,0.021395123,0.9613567,0.009452735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007835551,0.000009292603,0.00039390312,0.00022245299,0.000011878972,0.00008567171,0.006528331,0.000032702224,0.000101071935,0.0020964295,0.99046373,0.000046651807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8386161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9359929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97728837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12408766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28199947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9003232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482650","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v1i2.54599","title":"Academic Integrity across the Canadian Landscape","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Academic integrity; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.06921980362017723,"score_gpt":0.41968069194922264,"score_spread":0.35046088832904543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482650","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07637402,0.019614141,0.0025362992,0.47524583,0.0017900001,0.000105075196,0.0004695896,0.00016348613,0.42370155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88111573,0.017703107,0.0028739485,0.039984282,0.0003949816,0.000056432495,0.00022756572,0.00013847055,0.05750548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775155,0.0038349845,0.00048314364,0.0019002337,0.008364202,0.007901909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624559,0.0033446883,0.0014308254,0.0008941781,0.016320972,0.015553387],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010327932,0.0005466783,0.00077186676,0.0045526205,0.08759004,0.024324376,0.0033370624,0.0054253656,0.015459081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019950552,0.0005545269,0.0007531755,0.008465012,0.033872284,0.006696777,0.012463368,0.009909584,0.0009936113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006196585,0.00007755355,0.010151376,0.00033078092,0.0000418667,0.0009739328,0.08012765,0.0007085292,0.00045738296,0.6667911,0.12836601,0.111911826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016584341,0.000039097897,0.015051779,0.0008750001,0.000040402527,0.00030561598,0.08684882,0.0004120594,0.00031391383,0.032042686,0.86388916,0.00016485983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99655426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26190466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.54970205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.856086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482663","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v1i1.43396","title":"Writers’ Guide for Prospective Contributors to Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Engineering","score_opus":0.058236347591171404,"score_gpt":0.414101091612303,"score_spread":0.3558647440211316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064015035,0.0093318615,0.039378434,0.18248779,0.053962674,0.0046448754,0.016448295,0.006204263,0.6811403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030530004,0.007982197,0.09003155,0.025869744,0.0022973057,0.0033170602,0.0049080374,0.002948854,0.83211523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886247,0.0029641513,0.00088319834,0.00053452613,0.00551304,0.001480435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9069959,0.016649427,0.0019951717,0.0033595527,0.060150173,0.0108497655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014398133,0.0010624906,0.0007593398,0.0077030137,0.016278546,0.007313689,0.002730019,0.0039115935,0.12577939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066053934,0.00092208607,0.0005673919,0.008164156,0.0046154875,0.0027133063,0.0042000175,0.0068743206,0.043755192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015565643,0.000017516284,0.00017124372,0.00010248059,0.0000015864514,0.00015461288,0.00940023,0.00005207529,0.00023477088,0.007173425,0.9588972,0.023779282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032918085,0.0000029787775,0.0001561531,0.000079855046,0.0000011509647,0.00004443429,0.0026670264,0.00002347,0.00004670728,0.00043999328,0.9965191,0.000015809454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57478184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84474444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57478184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023637978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13034329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8554447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482694","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v3i1.69836","title":"Building a Regional Academic Integrity Network: Profiling the Growth and Action of the Academic Integrity Council of Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Humber Polytechnic; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Profiling (computer programming); Research integrity; Political science; Data integrity; Engineering ethics; Computer security; Computer science; Engineering; Public relations","score_opus":0.18668153063169607,"score_gpt":0.3766295742645745,"score_spread":0.18994804363287843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43564132,0.008589173,0.0034432227,0.22531591,0.0008496379,0.0006143825,0.0017693387,0.00034248244,0.3234345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.930806,0.00414524,0.003811308,0.0046413834,0.00013053125,0.00013197787,0.0006206943,0.00016816407,0.055544753],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798124,0.003616026,0.0005792081,0.0010997877,0.008595177,0.0062974463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9480866,0.004356052,0.005914517,0.0014764671,0.02045586,0.019710517],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011874587,0.00024391284,0.0003796114,0.0036501847,0.0241689,0.012372103,0.0022907841,0.0021819263,0.007888927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02708626,0.00043787961,0.00033091183,0.0078434665,0.009452585,0.0043981727,0.008426325,0.0024203185,0.0010137898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019870845,0.000099926874,0.13680264,0.00090134685,0.000062738305,0.0015050661,0.32864332,0.00072590244,0.002557706,0.14938028,0.22957022,0.14955223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000118643475,0.00003771985,0.10270504,0.00032239355,0.000023470291,0.0001921535,0.19758391,0.0004321714,0.00032845652,0.0018067238,0.69648176,0.00007435619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9508081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98107564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99781805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1364117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27207664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482718","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74178","title":"An Aggie's Approach to Restorative Academic Integrity Practices","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Academic integrity; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14168541956183156,"score_gpt":0.46013509656266066,"score_spread":0.3184496770008291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013746729,0.0061363163,0.037912805,0.19671667,0.0022082895,0.00034634647,0.00009857656,0.00018325685,0.742651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5543106,0.013162624,0.056417216,0.03621735,0.0007172849,0.00056739413,0.00006234159,0.00021900295,0.33832613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99299437,0.0033723281,0.00019961632,0.0005405954,0.0018034822,0.0010896276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589264,0.0016485995,0.00031992098,0.0002794888,0.0012209432,0.00063836545],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060717063,0.0009593574,0.00045856682,0.005496315,0.026721632,0.015425283,0.0030654825,0.0053325314,0.0071768854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061985506,0.00036303746,0.0007476528,0.0030470847,0.041703545,0.004818024,0.008893297,0.010082597,0.0008355324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063293605,0.000029271352,0.00059187174,0.000104584,0.0000052587307,0.00022955147,0.057675853,0.00019633771,0.0001958584,0.9014168,0.018146232,0.021402137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044655676,0.000036987458,0.0016140635,0.0005320181,0.000014738912,0.00053363753,0.10292134,0.00042823772,0.0003796238,0.11226622,0.7812345,0.000034245604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3274035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6015004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03579301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051385496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6509956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482781","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.77848","title":"Reflecting on Creating a Culture of Academic Integrity at the University of Manitoba: CSAI 2023 Greetings","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10431843480409665,"score_gpt":0.40712216651902267,"score_spread":0.302803731714926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062848567,0.008249337,0.00017631907,0.94646126,0.017735157,0.000028366765,0.00010812945,0.000035778507,0.020920867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20496528,0.052243765,0.0030612664,0.4282935,0.01720298,0.0002713835,0.00055578334,0.00059597235,0.29281],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890211,0.0021006523,0.0002009543,0.00042855187,0.0051327157,0.0031160752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96945894,0.0029551813,0.0007693719,0.00049319316,0.011321623,0.015001652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01186415,0.00087408826,0.00084626203,0.0017962954,0.05497547,0.01956537,0.0026772297,0.012081748,0.015160602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0142731555,0.00074481283,0.0005863332,0.004382815,0.019325275,0.0049471287,0.008960187,0.018848255,0.0023175052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016288917,0.000035157533,0.0009922788,0.00011108211,0.000009106972,0.0002452432,0.062865786,0.00003035611,0.00046992238,0.0109146815,0.9098081,0.014501973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049902187,0.000012553713,0.002571487,0.00021066092,0.000005578401,0.00010407052,0.0738344,0.000021224543,0.00014605741,0.000793289,0.9222566,0.000038995193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87725693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96035427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87725693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08578738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27265546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6224339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400583026","doi":"10.1145/3660780","title":"Do Words Have Power? Understanding and Fostering Civility in Code Review Discussion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Power (physics); Code (set theory); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Programming language; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0743767049240331,"score_gpt":0.3572547891152694,"score_spread":0.28287808419123633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400583026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5786625,0.009310001,0.034881774,0.20794815,0.001577964,0.00026701175,0.00004882222,0.00030803142,0.16699581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98736304,0.0014009607,0.0019132608,0.005373882,0.0003634663,0.00012544732,0.000020013938,0.00013900697,0.0033008803],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.80901045,0.15653343,0.0045436625,0.006608651,0.016256116,0.0070477724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5189419,0.38971597,0.045634285,0.012059797,0.020021725,0.013626336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.066027574,0.00089815794,0.0009118636,0.007814402,0.022809533,0.027620338,0.0034136015,0.008254616,0.004857671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2938707,0.0013331388,0.00084490766,0.0032217966,0.06190302,0.04517166,0.029879173,0.009419537,0.00122374],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028349667,0.000020021933,0.0034946308,0.00014251813,0.000012789754,0.00060897414,0.9421662,0.000045543446,0.00028853,0.03865084,0.0025002286,0.012041435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035170062,0.00006597431,0.002969235,0.00081565086,0.000031652828,0.0008426611,0.78724384,0.00049066654,0.00054565707,0.08985628,0.11703151,0.00007174453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051375683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005652096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066027574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013449858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018375972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34919137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400595661","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jah.v2024i2024.79529","title":"A Suspicion of Testimony and the Tradition of Institutional Contexts: An Exploration of Translative Practice for Conducting Ethically Responsible Research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Hermeneutics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Psychology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.4348632409180778,"score_gpt":0.539238279073781,"score_spread":0.10437503815570315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400595661","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1620557,0.014497291,0.14590983,0.5210633,0.0025987367,0.0007440245,0.000050557148,0.00022669967,0.15285377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96365666,0.0021163102,0.017155182,0.012975957,0.00033168148,0.00052871613,0.000013144259,0.00013714096,0.0030852642],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.54338527,0.42903176,0.0054237973,0.0058527063,0.011637033,0.0046694605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5654035,0.3894435,0.011277225,0.017687833,0.011192692,0.0049951836],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.26306698,0.001167197,0.001532342,0.005776983,0.045737132,0.04138328,0.007112335,0.02112253,0.0034700755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26115677,0.0017120114,0.0016256758,0.005077801,0.21522094,0.04219125,0.03613884,0.026981173,0.0006587301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013754525,0.000017930697,0.00023061676,0.00015233972,0.000007066678,0.00043409446,0.7552304,0.000078176585,0.00012454302,0.2381597,0.001032691,0.004518619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040356514,0.00006673911,0.0002697017,0.001911898,0.000019159956,0.001063788,0.66713035,0.0010164448,0.0004962045,0.24796714,0.07996038,0.000057810565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063983956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005224448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26306698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021377314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03743696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9087696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400837229","doi":"10.51644/9781771125949-016","title":"Appendix: Statutes in Canada re the Admission of Women as Lawyers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Appendix; Law; Political science; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.04955392968417876,"score_gpt":0.3453817089754122,"score_spread":0.29582777929123344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400837229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014041812,0.0013182083,0.0006849679,0.010627795,0.002299247,0.00076030457,0.030681849,0.00057689537,0.9516466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050850767,0.0006775481,0.00089433533,0.006738759,0.00027100978,0.00021626307,0.0037036499,0.00018769542,0.98222554],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971296,0.00016672313,0.000110212706,0.00021696302,0.0016233803,0.0007531887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914904,0.0021043634,0.00015603045,0.00039551244,0.0052514593,0.0006021202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017450217,0.0009913533,0.0011134641,0.0052640075,0.010495903,0.0065513914,0.004545076,0.009579533,0.250701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070168707,0.001368067,0.0009088078,0.00878269,0.0019999011,0.001825931,0.00127791,0.005878978,0.05084795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005532147,0.000021881859,0.000103952014,0.000029844961,0.0000014025541,0.00002163908,0.00009769785,0.000073657495,0.000034493714,0.015053354,0.98052657,0.0040299944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021781665,0.0000054784773,0.0028735367,0.00012556773,0.0000068655822,0.000029307555,0.00026665715,0.00011227868,0.00009853574,0.003379671,0.99305177,0.000028487812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96463203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9848216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.250701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06499286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10647475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8386784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400837333","doi":"10.51644/9781771125949-002","title":"Prologue Telling the Stories of Women Becoming Lawyers in Ontario","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prologue; History; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.137016692542849,"score_gpt":0.35983153162183745,"score_spread":0.22281483907898844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400837333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14803948,0.015350878,0.0020207472,0.18503563,0.005336805,0.00025481317,0.0015491936,0.00017919815,0.64223325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34484735,0.011236701,0.0010310353,0.01712774,0.00076024,0.00013680008,0.00037581258,0.00035008008,0.6241342],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987066,0.00043007254,0.000029001852,0.00007689502,0.00028083503,0.00047653884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996141,0.002189143,0.00020002249,0.000071984345,0.00043999625,0.00095797656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001527442,0.00061623816,0.0004000499,0.0015258262,0.033639733,0.0058522015,0.0016308592,0.003951517,0.01800023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049580745,0.00043940477,0.00028696103,0.0023641044,0.008875377,0.003850265,0.003962737,0.006158981,0.0014483375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004211242,0.000026660795,0.0010158573,0.00015376475,0.0000045639003,0.0028967715,0.7271443,0.00007936499,0.00033102193,0.03039361,0.22209062,0.015821366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025326935,0.0000086500195,0.0009567648,0.00015656165,0.00000372164,0.00033102103,0.30537888,0.00003819324,0.00013445751,0.0011324402,0.6918476,0.000009191307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73494726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94302064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26505274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04820855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032533415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5332273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400854739","doi":"10.69893/gjle.000009","title":"ALLOWING LAWYERS TO CHARGE CONTINGENCY FEES: IMPACT ON THE LEGAL SERVICES MARKET","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gnlu Journal Of Law And Economics.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal service; Business; Contingency; Charge (physics); Actuarial science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.019562338028192166,"score_gpt":0.32074994714587535,"score_spread":0.30118760911768316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400854739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6083952,0.0033697318,0.0061227162,0.04198523,0.00044982575,0.0005820414,0.0008620644,0.00076377916,0.3374694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829274,0.000546235,0.00078421034,0.0022171203,0.00029744595,0.000049969432,0.000116581534,0.000033215787,0.013027844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930073,0.002627229,0.00016750084,0.0004158365,0.0018018552,0.0019803443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94527334,0.03707401,0.004922047,0.0016788477,0.0037019937,0.007349771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076801972,0.0004143197,0.0007434814,0.0016568721,0.0029034463,0.009495956,0.0024379673,0.0059275194,0.06948971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040384267,0.00044536445,0.0009311004,0.0022606773,0.003069961,0.007019738,0.0046163616,0.004628668,0.0025936228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057657454,0.0153917335,0.051381797,0.0006780074,0.00022109116,0.0028798364,0.001959729,0.04285768,0.003891017,0.6059982,0.08780211,0.18117306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070768115,0.007319274,0.12845036,0.0008332802,0.0009816672,0.0016516306,0.015518534,0.22791976,0.007021095,0.38099435,0.2215874,0.00064580503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03708484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033079434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06948971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009828732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01008471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23246628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401073304","doi":"10.7202/1112614ar","title":"Ethnographie comparée de facultés de droit canadiennes : un voyage aller-retour","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de l’Université de Moncton","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028769595198254533,"score_gpt":0.2734466323880759,"score_spread":0.2446770371898214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401073304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8544003,0.017765386,0.00416451,0.020659631,0.0005953266,0.0006313701,0.0014579293,0.000053569016,0.10027197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96831155,0.0043668677,0.0023061987,0.0024721865,0.00015236814,0.0007787397,0.00045395116,0.000068987145,0.021089],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873088,0.007562677,0.00044078365,0.00075752335,0.0020654507,0.0018648317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757293,0.015342829,0.0013050828,0.002013093,0.003912852,0.001696925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011336713,0.00033991892,0.0007159345,0.009922421,0.013703534,0.0075423927,0.0017067207,0.0019488761,0.014048521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029984169,0.00043464146,0.00040283072,0.015594185,0.009562231,0.0069739297,0.008685227,0.002464446,0.00075738603],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008356555,0.00003738373,0.011392054,0.00027336273,0.000019332838,0.00028229153,0.92506146,0.0000627745,0.00062549394,0.030677466,0.0051494907,0.026335454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008638729,0.000034941942,0.042129513,0.00057780166,0.000009543716,0.00016033747,0.8433969,0.00004269828,0.00036206457,0.0033215296,0.10992449,0.00003154478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15707417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25708997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9862965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022485184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014125302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31231976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401108609","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4909227","title":"Foreword, Addresses, and Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03488003395469257,"score_gpt":0.4017020938091489,"score_spread":0.3668220598544563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401108609","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010353415,0.42519096,0.00046294046,0.06363401,0.5003168,0.00015827715,0.00088127574,0.00011303157,0.009139076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015433438,0.40531737,0.00094725605,0.0739593,0.4503721,0.00059105625,0.0012200782,0.00018572657,0.06586378],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965758,0.00049111864,0.0006174745,0.00044750885,0.001605815,0.00026224286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816186,0.006332522,0.002637851,0.0008571799,0.006506824,0.0020471555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052087083,0.0017176757,0.0033586065,0.0097501585,0.0017577492,0.009842502,0.00247347,0.009036363,0.06320004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036797833,0.0006924034,0.0015110587,0.009383047,0.0020335596,0.008376317,0.004277002,0.006778083,0.05228747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047825877,0.000013818098,0.000035671874,0.0046438677,0.000021971733,0.00004613471,0.000021861311,0.000028318982,0.000110191504,0.0017464424,0.9414867,0.051797148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027771972,0.000023731305,0.00023404788,0.0054980703,0.000044301047,0.0001192321,0.000048941714,0.000022505192,0.000053172767,0.0034198726,0.9904941,0.000014312921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002499615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031933526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06320004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037060834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010306806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21142519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401233490","doi":"10.1097/01.eem.0001027768.30642.7b","title":"Evidence Mounting for the Green Whistle","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emergency Medicine News","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.28542194880388067,"score_gpt":0.5070587739982222,"score_spread":0.22163682519434152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401233490","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030045472,0.66116285,0.002899034,0.2346246,0.015104056,0.00020662762,0.0039923536,0.0002053488,0.07880056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06064233,0.79146904,0.007196616,0.11098439,0.016923256,0.00025194383,0.0035027598,0.00020932083,0.00882036],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919178,0.002652342,0.0011979007,0.0014157038,0.0023891516,0.00042712793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83531106,0.12525062,0.011446755,0.0031525085,0.022096934,0.0027421787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011898147,0.0008473167,0.0013139903,0.0050331517,0.0011317208,0.0061673606,0.0027518703,0.00568777,0.11392216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082626335,0.000605055,0.002508991,0.004750817,0.0036746385,0.0054633482,0.0021608954,0.00815648,0.015160849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086584676,0.00012253808,0.008027841,0.065488644,0.001191431,0.0006108049,0.00072003156,0.00024745843,0.00047651213,0.028603753,0.35658383,0.53706133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017802365,0.00017641603,0.009685086,0.14807178,0.0014891699,0.0011939679,0.0015135149,0.00014589085,0.0002935598,0.012050199,0.82514006,0.00006238862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005523704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008904274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11392216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018594789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058439323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38110757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401362369","doi":"10.7202/1112316ar","title":"Professional Ethics and Law in Education: A Canadian Guidebook by Bruce Maxwell, Dianne Gereluk and Christopher Martin, Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars, 2022","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Professional ethics; Media studies; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06208237558525663,"score_gpt":0.42318558605193785,"score_spread":0.3611032104666812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401362369","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00096546026,0.5088767,0.0060656494,0.12048741,0.011103037,0.0007206266,0.016136415,0.00059840665,0.33504632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009975732,0.30371708,0.011217423,0.012676209,0.0013964543,0.00047909937,0.0066905716,0.00058984716,0.6532576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962446,0.0003625022,0.00022823429,0.00022529492,0.0025723171,0.00036695212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99394625,0.0010730416,0.00018816596,0.00015808229,0.0039609354,0.0006735585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032011394,0.0022383418,0.0013334849,0.0073531456,0.006712658,0.007081912,0.0022005474,0.003568981,0.048538342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069183754,0.0014785433,0.00063836714,0.015301138,0.0055362564,0.006023507,0.0026661607,0.005340753,0.022988962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043658574,0.000007056731,0.00008314216,0.00015908832,0.0000014970612,0.000018645651,0.0009772517,0.00009021898,0.000039258146,0.005114252,0.9575786,0.035926696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020008818,0.0000015278233,0.00045524404,0.00027345814,0.0000015307518,0.000026797046,0.00057065906,0.000023082725,0.000017213093,0.00146013,0.9971583,0.0000099975705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9264532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97059995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07354683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05372597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15799062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38981104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401505038","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4907049","title":"ACCESSIBILITY, QUALITY, AND PROFITABILITY FOR PERSONAL PLIGHT LAW FIRMS: HITTING THE SWEET SPOT","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Profitability index; Sweet spot; Quality (philosophy); Business; Law; Advertising; Engineering; Political science; Finance; Simulation; Philosophy","score_opus":0.081519708274486,"score_gpt":0.44696297830134846,"score_spread":0.36544327002686244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401505038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720518,0.0021693667,0.0004970986,0.016925136,0.00003817799,0.000013191569,0.0005575269,0.000023772607,0.0077239657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988863,0.0002130004,0.000046878547,0.00022266142,0.00005963472,0.000001910509,0.0001039579,0.0000053069743,0.00046029896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986721,0.00041974545,0.000089381494,0.0001442194,0.00031500414,0.00035947337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95304394,0.018530458,0.0128182545,0.0012043541,0.0040214458,0.010381573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022833864,0.00014573135,0.00041931562,0.0014862147,0.0011624913,0.004778738,0.0007703813,0.0023041472,0.012446066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016897699,0.00017095085,0.00040462476,0.0023990315,0.0020449006,0.006678278,0.0028032346,0.0024481218,0.0009218722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003744467,0.00044551198,0.9552113,0.000066328736,0.00012394755,0.000217831,0.0011110696,0.0008289941,0.0001335579,0.0070360447,0.006318677,0.028132346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004962855,0.00032431178,0.9572544,0.00011187551,0.00009250116,0.00013860482,0.011363746,0.002042408,0.00025188897,0.0244122,0.003906308,0.000052062285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025116201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041682616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025116201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017856277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012675637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04994005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401534339","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4912503","title":"The E-Team Project: A Teamwork Approach to Clinical Legal Education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Engineering management; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.039209549831845256,"score_gpt":0.4439703646722639,"score_spread":0.40476081484041865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401534339","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.335672,0.00087343453,0.47497988,0.043139346,0.0033246581,0.01780823,0.00075778493,0.0029159652,0.12052875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5148791,0.00046933972,0.44402763,0.0042211236,0.00035834225,0.009302809,0.00059783907,0.0006774689,0.025466317],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95392656,0.037511993,0.0010475992,0.0019186636,0.0030808027,0.0025144012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.946996,0.019732459,0.0017620311,0.0043749884,0.0048129945,0.022321602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034867316,0.0006392024,0.00053848245,0.0024959478,0.007882223,0.0069996715,0.0033945357,0.0025549836,0.018320154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04183219,0.00060017564,0.0007671407,0.0016509364,0.004235047,0.0044163526,0.016957354,0.003983893,0.0028483355],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007580927,0.013382037,0.013852899,0.000820295,0.00013131392,0.0010187078,0.059643827,0.0035936742,0.002791185,0.037178967,0.084220596,0.78260833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035768019,0.0101764295,0.03746578,0.0033199317,0.00024883167,0.0026033402,0.28889117,0.030328402,0.01087162,0.17196964,0.44011912,0.00042897026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002953079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006042451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034867316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028600008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03139723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18439817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401535991","doi":"10.7202/1107443ar","title":"L’ADMINISTRATION DE LA JUSTICE ET LA STRUCTURE JUDICIAIRE CANADIENNE","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.00786441816603578,"score_gpt":0.2713071557782086,"score_spread":0.2634427376121728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401535991","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023523608,0.06522663,0.0042780945,0.5742163,0.0024066702,0.00007337854,0.00010245632,0.00008108256,0.33009177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7803769,0.028342472,0.00284315,0.03998075,0.0018038867,0.00013362002,0.0001187674,0.00008527526,0.14631514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783814,0.008335949,0.00052248867,0.0014753651,0.0058556967,0.005429064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806723,0.007505233,0.0020414388,0.0011759645,0.003761393,0.0048436425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013537421,0.0005125893,0.00075969304,0.0020684395,0.012416579,0.018257987,0.0017479872,0.0118637085,0.013755822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031875875,0.00056432415,0.0004202636,0.0032338398,0.037038825,0.0080741225,0.008228479,0.012221416,0.0021543538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016567932,0.000023168117,0.00086238334,0.0000702259,0.000006762062,0.000055045504,0.007514596,0.00014454714,0.00009179698,0.94641435,0.027707446,0.01709317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007059589,0.00007973217,0.010457694,0.0011981453,0.000017016513,0.00013824562,0.010930723,0.00032451758,0.0004140186,0.2678722,0.70841396,0.00008309919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20966023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3229422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95673007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04326994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097317554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41687977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401777829","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v13n4p23","title":"Academic Freedom, Institutional Autonomy in Higher Education Institutions in Uganda: Policy, Legal and Ethical Tensions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Autonomy; Higher education; Dilemma; Freedom of movement; Power (physics); Sociology; Politics; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07836540301282276,"score_gpt":0.4681939514894803,"score_spread":0.38982854847665754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401777829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8412924,0.016925814,0.0027759706,0.050616223,0.0001878157,0.00011343995,0.00006842717,0.000017839624,0.088002026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957903,0.0013560941,0.00030109426,0.00069589954,0.000025158553,0.000026104282,0.0000066155353,0.0000031151385,0.0017956765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98585594,0.009090266,0.0008001818,0.0004939815,0.001382105,0.0023775543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98293686,0.009854531,0.003590528,0.00047371583,0.0008045304,0.0023399086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011207838,0.00017733952,0.00043900998,0.0029190984,0.012936598,0.016045272,0.000960886,0.0025918495,0.0037870097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015319324,0.000467687,0.00022810354,0.00445963,0.023038676,0.008193558,0.013570138,0.0030391915,0.00025058782],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011366952,0.00015707815,0.045996763,0.0011056756,0.000028527242,0.0028723606,0.3098521,0.00077334495,0.00048789513,0.5609551,0.0038969424,0.07376059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003151462,0.00015423856,0.055823214,0.0028549826,0.000039738115,0.0016008558,0.62408304,0.00074408314,0.0005944155,0.14313845,0.17081524,0.00012021898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007799366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010724169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016045272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014857331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018332118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10779798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401803884","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-96110-8_9511","title":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Legal Studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.06407463263638659,"score_gpt":0.37102782993033323,"score_spread":0.30695319729394666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401803884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042684877,0.018798102,0.00034834328,0.013173365,0.0018611026,0.00006207045,0.0069742277,0.0001942561,0.9581617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005758985,0.0075553874,0.00064924033,0.0010936243,0.0001317201,0.000056014313,0.0013847165,0.00010454537,0.98326576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969854,0.00014958758,0.00011370432,0.00026031648,0.0020275393,0.00046339608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675024,0.0004078763,0.00008780657,0.00030795755,0.002015255,0.00043094868],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015862694,0.0009158219,0.001145605,0.003976708,0.008044241,0.008431319,0.0018675801,0.0034951896,0.23890583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048567075,0.00077796367,0.0006743756,0.006590705,0.0025931553,0.0026560957,0.002113141,0.004172637,0.04170118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012177504,0.000011305978,0.0001495055,0.00013792152,0.0000036325976,0.00003790036,0.00015944811,0.000092163034,0.000031989992,0.11191527,0.85046315,0.036985498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027086471,0.0000011744162,0.00042510513,0.0001002037,0.0000023984492,0.000010373725,0.00012652653,0.000036571724,0.000024281997,0.0040763007,0.995188,0.000006221033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94196457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96553224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76109415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03710688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.119995706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7992196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401805327","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-96110-8_9568","title":"Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the United Kingdom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts; Canada Council for the Arts; École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales; Strong","keywords":"Commonwealth; Scholarship; Kingdom; Commission; Political science; Public administration; Law; Geology","score_opus":0.13248395660810094,"score_gpt":0.39012480671970545,"score_spread":0.25764085011160454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401805327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042663226,0.08914365,0.00040159866,0.017706223,0.004242873,0.000047926624,0.002022245,0.00021511839,0.88195395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010195518,0.0050887247,0.000104872255,0.00057812076,0.000104314764,0.00001943916,0.0001594182,0.000067823064,0.9836817],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985876,0.00021131811,0.00011670795,0.0002487636,0.0005379174,0.00029772508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983467,0.00040485238,0.00013711723,0.00028108127,0.00053813506,0.00029209186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008325046,0.0006803073,0.00090067793,0.0018018511,0.0050218124,0.009439508,0.0008054686,0.004712781,0.15343982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004223871,0.00078513456,0.00032490757,0.0043297485,0.0020463013,0.0033046596,0.0031301572,0.002896625,0.03711615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006935535,0.00001863762,0.00035475244,0.0003843568,0.000008557193,0.0004581463,0.0023149208,0.00013550736,0.00020928029,0.13293663,0.77153844,0.091571406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003168382,0.000005576871,0.0006971591,0.00014411415,0.0000019506174,0.000039848626,0.00034881165,0.000010623995,0.000035429635,0.0012866971,0.99742186,0.0000047526228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15894708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41320318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15894708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010590356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011312341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51330733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401878531","doi":"10.1080/17579961.2024.2392938","title":"The language of the law vs. the language of the computer: a bilingual model of legal education in the age of technology and artificial intelligence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Innovation and Technology","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Bilingual education; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Political science; Psychology; Mathematics education; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025197735728977523,"score_gpt":0.3583111817615598,"score_spread":0.33311344603258225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401878531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19529381,0.0023778898,0.02145524,0.16298522,0.00034919713,0.00007889955,0.000056083794,0.0000897579,0.61731386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671303,0.0011450007,0.004413843,0.006651056,0.000119528086,0.000054674438,0.000022133214,0.00003349971,0.020429898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981147,0.0011451691,0.00003322047,0.00016782887,0.00023535742,0.00030374902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983467,0.0006046192,0.00015279632,0.00006559616,0.00017855149,0.00065181684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024082472,0.00021417631,0.00019297052,0.0010951557,0.0053753085,0.0058070314,0.00070273975,0.001995228,0.005017521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002236864,0.00015466585,0.00021943098,0.000622836,0.017092438,0.0063707745,0.003993315,0.0031438775,0.00079094607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034936114,0.00011176677,0.0013217996,0.00004174735,0.0000015674668,0.00023476669,0.044394087,0.00007282762,0.00044920825,0.9419098,0.0024488813,0.008978697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016107335,0.00030588688,0.0056173126,0.0004952422,0.000028359726,0.0011888533,0.120073885,0.0044914866,0.0017357408,0.63429105,0.23154953,0.000061679486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018054336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024170376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018054336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005620463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008188259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04077953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402082081","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-61565-8_31","title":"A Proposal for Training ABA Practitioners in Ethical Deliberation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"˜The œInternational Library of Bioethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Surrey Place Centre; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Training (meteorology); Ethical issues; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.12786575268881714,"score_gpt":0.4064448914329867,"score_spread":0.2785791387441695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402082081","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003793189,0.0011284476,0.053510472,0.6342001,0.016691094,0.001318545,0.00012019871,0.00054844306,0.28868952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050315496,0.00096250995,0.13101079,0.16283953,0.0018589251,0.0033640906,0.00014717865,0.00030230678,0.6491992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883349,0.006822434,0.00038761992,0.0007032848,0.0024658912,0.0012858411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98594564,0.0066926074,0.00033138343,0.0007652464,0.003240875,0.0030242926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021654181,0.0005986885,0.00051442825,0.001725455,0.0077349776,0.01213089,0.0030710136,0.025966413,0.027765976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025958106,0.00077247195,0.00113592,0.0013823227,0.013371413,0.010568539,0.005557072,0.019885754,0.009238371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011219098,0.00020117825,0.00016542918,0.000100402955,0.0000026474436,0.00014280812,0.0042443853,0.00020545529,0.00021129292,0.65697974,0.31065962,0.02707576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006249488,0.00007310957,0.0004253201,0.00040141796,0.000008499031,0.00018417732,0.0085342815,0.00073636376,0.00025707195,0.26272804,0.7265467,0.000042444364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006946469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020791978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027765976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055233845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03526945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114519596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402098464","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/74p59","title":"Between Law and Conscience: The Role of Legality in Moral Decision-Making","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Conscience; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.057879708433685416,"score_gpt":0.43752712463032106,"score_spread":0.37964741619663567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402098464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98669773,0.00008643743,0.0014593471,0.0003135428,0.000013017025,0.000010553458,0.0000102900885,0.0000054476086,0.011403613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992644,0.000017301363,0.0004789936,0.000041858424,0.000004321832,0.0000062442755,0.000006982594,0.000006122227,0.00017376346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563897,0.0027389915,0.00012697306,0.00055594003,0.0006967161,0.00024242836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9483784,0.038923185,0.006544936,0.002654981,0.0015748886,0.0019237011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068897386,0.00021025163,0.00028634202,0.00071879517,0.0011095871,0.0036490925,0.00033152348,0.00073079794,0.0042118384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0628973,0.00030168612,0.00029156014,0.0004247666,0.004531711,0.0027500049,0.0019688827,0.0018285512,0.00018491976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002627561,0.0013986083,0.5890347,0.00051812205,0.00031292965,0.0009423708,0.1454831,0.002047301,0.044753917,0.05085139,0.0011439285,0.1608861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000890876,0.00035744876,0.91611373,0.00017612989,0.00011490167,0.00033005828,0.017375616,0.0054156217,0.003235668,0.05409281,0.002572939,0.00012595301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030160807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037539564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068897386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081692805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010272665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036436915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402110236","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v2i2.43525","title":"Reply to \"Concealed Aims of Education?\"","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.04675415400378859,"score_gpt":0.4496439783822719,"score_spread":0.4028898243784833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402110236","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011375428,0.00039129762,0.00007613061,0.99361247,0.005472715,0.0000020588163,0.00001932133,0.0000070902906,0.0003051035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024000218,0.00036136937,0.000101972364,0.98838985,0.007864049,0.000016538737,0.000011164894,0.0000114931245,0.0008435171],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991434,0.003298078,0.0010081925,0.0015490239,0.0017622127,0.00094855286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95458376,0.032409877,0.0021280127,0.0014461111,0.007200406,0.0022318915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015619269,0.001253498,0.0016092284,0.0010690276,0.0069674803,0.0059018545,0.0049466947,0.067980245,0.007878495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0807239,0.0011826707,0.0012463933,0.0015325069,0.014163528,0.011444523,0.0054187444,0.08469331,0.005352882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044448425,0.000008916617,0.00020376238,0.00007415644,0.000016442138,0.00016422637,0.00086807134,0.00005240367,0.00007323528,0.017314782,0.97842854,0.0027510861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018971942,0.000053290412,0.0019914676,0.0010748582,0.00007697773,0.00094624975,0.007076149,0.00047748434,0.0006907077,0.07141585,0.9157773,0.0002299937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009213817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009242732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067980245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005052715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077998154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082603574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402110470","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v26i3.52294","title":"The sociology of law: Critical approaches to social control","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Social control; Sociology of law; Critical theory; Social science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2195577780118939,"score_gpt":0.46739157257286196,"score_spread":0.24783379456096805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402110470","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025945768,0.067136765,0.22191224,0.46105936,0.0033612617,0.00009928903,0.00014205893,0.000121070814,0.22022216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9536166,0.012027282,0.016387237,0.0070482036,0.0030090467,0.00019123023,0.000028242555,0.000054786553,0.0076373722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99325776,0.0052705477,0.00012424568,0.00034278515,0.000753508,0.00025113544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756016,0.02078283,0.0007293049,0.0011541195,0.0011444612,0.00058759074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010810797,0.00074408884,0.0006950204,0.0033292354,0.0033671262,0.00921229,0.0013636138,0.003876888,0.003629347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016290782,0.0003319729,0.00046465086,0.0018802832,0.056641236,0.012610454,0.0027084076,0.0053399475,0.00028327585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028205752,0.0000046048167,0.00004823471,0.00001555518,0.0000017523274,0.000011621861,0.00078009936,0.0001527192,0.000012328477,0.9961837,0.0012076482,0.00157883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000603955,0.0000038019903,0.00005121524,0.000046625293,0.0000016916438,0.000012842087,0.0005993582,0.0005502501,0.000023401402,0.9912026,0.007499033,0.000003144206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00303815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029505307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010810797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066719516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056906724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05717361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402188623","doi":"10.32920/26871448","title":"The Perils of Justice: The Experiences of Black Immigrants and Other Racialized Families in Contact with the Justice System in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Immigration; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02916151038525104,"score_gpt":0.34583847162496845,"score_spread":0.3166769612397174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402188623","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34784007,0.5610925,0.00027214535,0.03891524,0.00084133726,0.00019780385,0.0013024096,0.000020413818,0.049518183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6696016,0.31688243,0.000453874,0.008392968,0.0000866256,0.00014669694,0.0004271503,0.000029628043,0.0039790343],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961493,0.0013990585,0.00023875236,0.00022647342,0.0011595687,0.00082678656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928076,0.0026819007,0.0007174641,0.00010380528,0.0027323435,0.0009568505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004490782,0.00044884026,0.0010537198,0.0029323783,0.014059291,0.008380437,0.0019894466,0.0020000346,0.0026383481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013531888,0.00034431528,0.00076439325,0.008278688,0.0065044174,0.0026944883,0.003801804,0.0020953414,0.00017572631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012213617,0.000049987964,0.022556992,0.016266355,0.00028763316,0.00246694,0.7911468,0.00023606778,0.00042640776,0.009038002,0.03253137,0.12487132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010291318,0.000038068058,0.025733542,0.031181004,0.0002606874,0.0005857032,0.8138547,0.000036121877,0.00013812956,0.00069991546,0.12738726,0.0000746049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97629106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06180388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06180388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18744627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44842064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402188991","doi":"10.32920/26871448.v1","title":"The Perils of Justice: The Experiences of Black Immigrants and Other Racialized Families in Contact with the Justice System in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology; Racial bias; Gender studies; Racism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02916151038525104,"score_gpt":0.34583847162496845,"score_spread":0.3166769612397174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402188991","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34784007,0.5610925,0.00027214535,0.03891524,0.00084133726,0.00019780385,0.0013024096,0.000020413818,0.049518183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6696016,0.31688243,0.000453874,0.008392968,0.0000866256,0.00014669694,0.0004271503,0.000029628043,0.0039790343],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961493,0.0013990585,0.00023875236,0.00022647342,0.0011595687,0.00082678656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928076,0.0026819007,0.0007174641,0.00010380528,0.0027323435,0.0009568505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004490782,0.00044884026,0.0010537198,0.0029323783,0.014059291,0.008380437,0.0019894466,0.0020000346,0.0026383481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013531888,0.00034431528,0.00076439325,0.008278688,0.0065044174,0.0026944883,0.003801804,0.0020953414,0.00017572631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012213617,0.000049987964,0.022556992,0.016266355,0.00028763316,0.00246694,0.7911468,0.00023606778,0.00042640776,0.009038002,0.03253137,0.12487132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010291318,0.000038068058,0.025733542,0.031181004,0.0002606874,0.0005857032,0.8138547,0.000036121877,0.00013812956,0.00069991546,0.12738726,0.0000746049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97629106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06180388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06180388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18744627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44842064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402366298","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4923411","title":"Law School Success: A Matter of Heart (Réussir ses études en droit: une affaire de cœur)","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01269163613273186,"score_gpt":0.3388415412764044,"score_spread":0.3261499051436726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402366298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4189533,0.006466329,0.0014405493,0.4675676,0.0016268252,0.00005666109,0.0003032565,0.00006345995,0.10352192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97818357,0.0017138085,0.00033528177,0.008116791,0.0006826004,0.000020457546,0.000053230404,0.000073432246,0.010820752],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99288577,0.002666277,0.00022582662,0.0006040498,0.0018288495,0.0017892722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94304854,0.018308518,0.0056915227,0.0016591352,0.009218143,0.02207424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011765213,0.00017174178,0.00050066505,0.0022429395,0.00675403,0.016216483,0.0012906835,0.0030843168,0.017362107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04699676,0.00029521875,0.00023564078,0.0026832572,0.014276322,0.008256708,0.0056288796,0.006993688,0.002213994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001518845,0.0008658655,0.33002037,0.00025625146,0.00012125478,0.0010566533,0.14181544,0.000136442,0.0006372216,0.1916215,0.14055865,0.19275847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035686513,0.00017382429,0.48567885,0.0012937206,0.000100344696,0.00061723345,0.22034605,0.00042028367,0.0009010144,0.05619065,0.2340733,0.000169046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04333636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068482794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04333636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036192893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077177845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08616823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402416649","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12819","title":"Exploring litigation abuse in Ontario: An analysis of costs decisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Criminology; Business; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.3093681621485638,"score_gpt":0.44585235867958023,"score_spread":0.13648419653101646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402416649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935442,0.00015173755,0.00007552251,0.0002655261,0.0000027283077,0.00007610838,0.0005904137,0.0000020145885,0.00529168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960424,0.00035043035,0.00018458194,0.000057091947,0.0000062984404,0.000046064626,0.0005241485,0.000002702266,0.0027863148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624133,0.00058214035,0.00023055133,0.00019180209,0.001827878,0.0009263738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810889,0.0063199154,0.0061526434,0.00040149209,0.0046411506,0.001395907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001957221,0.00019518257,0.00030479138,0.0039472175,0.0037434336,0.0018799619,0.00095851417,0.00052107347,0.0037053232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012684456,0.00034429,0.00043555687,0.008610263,0.0012414036,0.00071179145,0.0014750081,0.00060810114,0.00021515938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022438506,0.00018565205,0.9403241,0.0001299128,0.000074533724,0.001812585,0.032674935,0.0013320792,0.0004562826,0.0015378353,0.0020731366,0.019174624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004533096,0.00004337079,0.97318876,0.000029547526,0.0000139368985,0.000095298565,0.021630011,0.00077264686,0.00007074583,0.00010487633,0.004033718,0.000012539077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9585953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06269655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06269655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030720595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4548974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402678859","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2024.51845.mck","title":"Ontario Superior Court of Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.07868375591964542,"score_gpt":0.41709817802420934,"score_spread":0.3384144221045639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402678859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01049691,0.005737391,0.0004218827,0.094334446,0.0026396036,0.0004948976,0.0031516987,0.0001152805,0.88260776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045488276,0.0020438046,0.00062607374,0.055609323,0.0006361061,0.00033205634,0.0004616279,0.00009406325,0.8947087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881422,0.00077476504,0.00038744387,0.0011732803,0.0059605576,0.0035617275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917394,0.001856112,0.00021632323,0.00050576305,0.0045227464,0.001159574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004418487,0.001060058,0.0013118109,0.0036806783,0.034370176,0.016626583,0.003883884,0.024362216,0.052957375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015435649,0.0024961615,0.0016509183,0.0037390382,0.0058598383,0.002768778,0.0029227717,0.014754689,0.0056090895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062381696,0.000055223813,0.0016430554,0.0001293806,0.000050250692,0.00043377906,0.0013742952,0.00021998833,0.0002110227,0.23050788,0.7570926,0.008220156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008607659,0.000015687392,0.0070762625,0.0002983465,0.000073765696,0.000076693366,0.0012472979,0.00037135562,0.00026529847,0.012452043,0.977953,0.000084128675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9682413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09450789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09450789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20398232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6857059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403222339","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4946735","title":"Improving the Peer Review Process: How to Write a Good Referee Report","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Computer science; Peer review; Psychology; Political science; Operating system; Law","score_opus":0.04504017072595843,"score_gpt":0.40099873907194294,"score_spread":0.3559585683459845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403222339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006975682,0.010770564,0.262783,0.5328764,0.1421604,0.008180956,0.000656285,0.0121926265,0.023404168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07331033,0.012395471,0.7393562,0.044349078,0.073260896,0.008318919,0.0012932512,0.009511795,0.03820407],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.53855735,0.2652083,0.055852823,0.011227342,0.12360298,0.0055512004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.0982208,0.27586207,0.046819225,0.06273609,0.48620602,0.030155778],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33207655,0.0028467162,0.0041918885,0.013515806,0.012924663,0.030157436,0.0065482114,0.022191875,0.020755908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.78386754,0.00326311,0.002923953,0.0062992047,0.008130524,0.022962976,0.009021963,0.021098724,0.042796582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019213588,0.00029341236,0.00198102,0.001992198,0.00018782634,0.0011532233,0.005001445,0.0006274641,0.003416505,0.006625519,0.7268675,0.2516617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042334755,0.00077856245,0.01100234,0.0069725993,0.0006048648,0.0030940883,0.009170747,0.008368583,0.009025603,0.06424338,0.88480324,0.0015125652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032979583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072172326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66792345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006023096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050543454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82366854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403283636","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v9i5.2925","title":"IPDLN Workshop: Opportunities for Cross-Country Comparisons of Linked Administrative Education and Health Data","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Population Data Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Business","score_opus":0.6097572420545042,"score_gpt":0.6301518757336448,"score_spread":0.020394633679140628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403283636","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07179469,0.010161702,0.36719698,0.35328135,0.034913644,0.022041967,0.032400604,0.003945569,0.104263544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25823033,0.005877365,0.5906393,0.037901457,0.0047116634,0.040962294,0.021033457,0.003306065,0.03733798],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7753451,0.19931133,0.0061158617,0.005520138,0.007737421,0.0059700925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69617283,0.20514967,0.009011593,0.040069655,0.029984014,0.019612208],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3880384,0.0013545783,0.00127047,0.003458608,0.0051622894,0.013333483,0.0076078386,0.0038595046,0.034167442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23604049,0.0014575494,0.0031763662,0.0036055862,0.0033793463,0.014780754,0.040821623,0.011116523,0.00498766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016427808,0.0016228446,0.011696133,0.0055674794,0.00069711474,0.0030437831,0.0966852,0.002299486,0.004181454,0.06416917,0.3906324,0.4177622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043451294,0.000467818,0.010280645,0.0077820644,0.00015016682,0.00051646144,0.05300746,0.0015639879,0.0026734425,0.05701824,0.86577016,0.00033507575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004627543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008442389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006117995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02215701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7546576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403565147","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4992046","title":"Enhancing Lawyers' Well-Being and Competencies Beyond the Traditional Law School Curriculum: The Impact of Mindfulness Education on Law Students","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Hospital for Sick Children; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mindfulness; Curriculum; Legal education; Psychology; Law; Pedagogy; Sociology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.012350837654531953,"score_gpt":0.34672689667377815,"score_spread":0.3343760590192462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403565147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997526,0.0001114979,0.000108257474,0.00041716264,0.000018354052,0.000038062666,0.000007662177,0.000009992849,0.0017630776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99680054,0.00035684882,0.00096406345,0.00024772543,0.000017429868,0.000056444398,0.000015639,0.0000032498176,0.001538014],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977475,0.000052673262,0.000005390923,0.000033101387,0.000044412816,0.00008965272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990729,0.0002595696,0.000074041214,0.00004166272,0.000051136907,0.00050068577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051650364,0.00019127184,0.0003091381,0.00029980062,0.00044791834,0.0008052153,0.00036859806,0.0004636693,0.0038584392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016507305,0.00013287192,0.0002790185,0.00017431148,0.0003983621,0.0004743087,0.00076668756,0.0011790415,0.0002636392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033210265,0.13248865,0.056268267,0.0007528072,0.00020614409,0.0002421528,0.00867825,0.00048000424,0.035598464,0.001828153,0.003417096,0.75671905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019805708,0.031018812,0.92657554,0.00063563423,0.0006152796,0.00026685788,0.0102260215,0.0020276345,0.012394108,0.0041619893,0.010028033,0.00006954636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017112895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047923415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038584392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029722703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015080472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012907803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403734335","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v13n5p56","title":"Reforming Saudi Legal Education for the Digital Age","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03535946285575702,"score_gpt":0.43794514152097663,"score_spread":0.4025856786652196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403734335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30420685,0.027486749,0.01314995,0.25412202,0.0020237656,0.00017068976,0.00015306682,0.00022542817,0.39846152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93708867,0.009744704,0.008883699,0.010863407,0.00042491267,0.000032468935,0.00007475425,0.000022894192,0.032864425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990069,0.00033683825,0.000075289696,0.00004987962,0.00031788633,0.00021325053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962929,0.0009817957,0.0006306951,0.00029447983,0.0011865874,0.0006135678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023302708,0.0001884243,0.00008467286,0.0013249833,0.0025469577,0.0033251701,0.00048604247,0.0015033545,0.0066641984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056176386,0.00009350984,0.00022357405,0.00068660703,0.0026795822,0.0031820994,0.0031876098,0.0013508636,0.0010513203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061574414,0.0003626188,0.012221784,0.0006410758,0.000015163406,0.00078388426,0.015360611,0.0017526539,0.0021846592,0.5243206,0.03160669,0.41068873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003118085,0.00009204819,0.013530118,0.0007876337,0.000018658682,0.00042529096,0.014420232,0.0015334506,0.0020125958,0.04116415,0.9259567,0.000027877819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02051448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02968852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02051448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006363308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014074614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04616922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403764058","doi":"10.24908/pceea.2023.17149","title":"Academic integrity: A restorative justice approach in first year engineering","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Restorative justice; Structural integrity; Engineering ethics; Economic Justice; Engineering; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Structural engineering","score_opus":0.024024945498316654,"score_gpt":0.30332308372500005,"score_spread":0.2792981382266834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403764058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24123687,0.0028624183,0.23672514,0.18216908,0.0015992563,0.0024197442,0.000054936787,0.0010070415,0.3319256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8150778,0.0015875465,0.12439773,0.008637064,0.00026395975,0.00081790145,0.000042472795,0.0001608353,0.049014665],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98015094,0.011656641,0.00048083856,0.0014151242,0.0041947044,0.0021018556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792575,0.0051085167,0.002088597,0.0020031992,0.0042382786,0.0073039075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020680167,0.00064846623,0.0005943516,0.0041302596,0.023734165,0.01716636,0.0061543393,0.0055916454,0.004626296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021443075,0.00049500837,0.0010226069,0.0014022052,0.016904347,0.007969388,0.022514826,0.010245952,0.0010095292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056186927,0.0034393843,0.018751033,0.00058843626,0.000055541917,0.001690202,0.2771794,0.0027953733,0.0028415746,0.26411724,0.033555686,0.39492998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062638304,0.0009477026,0.021837646,0.0014887567,0.00008800338,0.003273446,0.31078282,0.0067064245,0.004247926,0.2212933,0.42904156,0.00022972854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011494563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05349859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023734165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017843623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056861456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1294651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403764105","doi":"10.24908/pceea.2023.17131","title":"Moving on from the Consultation Model to the Consent Model in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.024146846355327354,"score_gpt":0.281717221584241,"score_spread":0.25757037522891363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403764105","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08008789,0.016443983,0.026719775,0.5308588,0.0015975185,0.0006292373,0.00026920924,0.00021998624,0.34317362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91439945,0.008450334,0.016543845,0.03577907,0.00020903438,0.00027956074,0.00013129805,0.00010493032,0.024102546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9407932,0.026981512,0.0020712633,0.0034384632,0.01785682,0.008858826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9220461,0.037061166,0.0027823006,0.002425612,0.024244525,0.011440279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045336813,0.00043562122,0.0007522,0.0026429018,0.02300396,0.014966531,0.0036802182,0.006147591,0.0055174837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06999462,0.0006091583,0.0008137701,0.0044744313,0.033600915,0.008540442,0.009819358,0.009515059,0.0004545743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009092333,0.00008225408,0.005880341,0.00067607895,0.000034659188,0.0016984941,0.062619306,0.00150222,0.0005537733,0.8048451,0.035820547,0.08619639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015540999,0.00013086497,0.015479024,0.004211999,0.000110585825,0.0009528522,0.10850012,0.006625355,0.0011411029,0.25452128,0.6077117,0.00045971887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.219619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.219619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4988638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90513134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403810560","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4999654","title":"New Crossroads and the Opportunity for a Crisis: The State of Canadian Legal Education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Legal education; Political science; Public administration; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02550651181511725,"score_gpt":0.359556000938361,"score_spread":0.3340494891232437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403810560","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06989773,0.01916963,0.0008073779,0.70307463,0.0017598382,0.000056156612,0.000649563,0.00011213026,0.2044729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89321935,0.011554206,0.0010930626,0.03356705,0.0005181157,0.000045996614,0.00026722197,0.00010971496,0.059625316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904207,0.00077115383,0.00018243985,0.0006786519,0.002678044,0.0052690306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829169,0.002468372,0.00067503774,0.0003703925,0.0050867614,0.008482626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063582812,0.0005304397,0.00083870156,0.0042116726,0.03668665,0.023587514,0.0033940596,0.007400194,0.042586092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018375624,0.00060151395,0.000643017,0.007171774,0.01949271,0.008634164,0.008143317,0.01208862,0.001124953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014655825,0.00008965558,0.008382537,0.00054348144,0.00003750841,0.00060681213,0.041273482,0.00084929104,0.00032612882,0.6006514,0.23435068,0.112742506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000475384,0.000033192882,0.031594343,0.0013418404,0.00004577958,0.00016261754,0.09792462,0.0010190267,0.00020690229,0.051493432,0.81588453,0.0002461125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99653196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7825776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21742244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42496178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.907679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403890106","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2024.2408074","title":"Shifting perspectives: the potential of rich, ill-structured problems in legal education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Sociology; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02077861452057169,"score_gpt":0.3496164388134905,"score_spread":0.32883782429291886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403890106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41819566,0.0038317565,0.3239103,0.058152303,0.0005770067,0.00050344726,0.00009912221,0.00046491798,0.19426544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93148804,0.0007810931,0.060486354,0.0014566011,0.00007971337,0.00021730276,0.00004823296,0.000103217084,0.0053394525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9687326,0.025399556,0.00048460788,0.0014764005,0.0030984585,0.00080835517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96909416,0.02383854,0.0017212128,0.0023116376,0.0010698893,0.0019645172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01617553,0.00093753124,0.00069273077,0.0027115636,0.006090463,0.012699514,0.0028905184,0.003395157,0.0067999787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0346244,0.00072092185,0.00079720916,0.0011093593,0.052227437,0.021151675,0.021966342,0.009022743,0.0006755193],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000707988,0.00021096524,0.0022318163,0.0003340872,0.000028859862,0.00090135145,0.425583,0.0035194354,0.0016934527,0.51572365,0.003273552,0.046429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065283406,0.000105265106,0.0006202985,0.00034911465,0.000014781591,0.00051772845,0.13829643,0.006332903,0.0010248737,0.7742328,0.078383274,0.00005726484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010588897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001801263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01617553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051472923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045295605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08554536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403967218","doi":"10.1177/2755323x241296683","title":"Putting the Bar to the Test: An Examination of the Predictive Validity of Bar Exam Outcomes on Lawyering Effectiveness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of law & empirical analysis.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Test (biology); Predictive validity; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Geography; Geology","score_opus":0.1091205595821231,"score_gpt":0.45004372911236307,"score_spread":0.34092316953023993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403967218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959194,0.00019687596,0.00061862124,0.00048537247,0.00003644935,0.000028154593,0.00050449773,0.000017438393,0.0021931275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984497,0.000084209634,0.00027663543,0.00007389636,0.000046966594,0.000026294492,0.00080539566,0.000009499812,0.00022734824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98778826,0.00643006,0.0010198667,0.0017004387,0.0024167737,0.0006446595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7620856,0.18140914,0.028081477,0.011852073,0.010033018,0.0065386975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023903077,0.0005886685,0.000686244,0.0038434674,0.0009093358,0.002048823,0.0019688734,0.001439391,0.0029838742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11459383,0.00034631352,0.0012234126,0.0028342395,0.0017272752,0.002884553,0.0023456227,0.0023521169,0.0006253273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048628644,0.000094575254,0.99709606,0.000008211588,0.00014056197,0.000012217809,0.00014697455,0.000103324826,0.000020132737,0.000081589635,0.00015603012,0.0020916318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000122319,0.00028750807,0.9943817,0.000035850106,0.00011681388,0.000054006025,0.0005590586,0.0036991448,0.00011406992,0.00027859118,0.0004474378,0.000013540861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077490844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008828161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023903077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005605681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012682183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12641305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404006113","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v9i5.2936","title":"IPDLN Workshop: Opportunities for Cross-Country Comparisons of Linked Administrative Education and Health Data","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Population Data Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Business","score_opus":0.6097572420545042,"score_gpt":0.6301518757336448,"score_spread":0.020394633679140628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404006113","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07179469,0.010161702,0.36719698,0.35328135,0.034913644,0.022041967,0.032400604,0.003945569,0.104263544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25823033,0.005877365,0.5906393,0.037901457,0.0047116634,0.040962294,0.021033457,0.003306065,0.03733798],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7753451,0.19931133,0.0061158617,0.005520138,0.007737421,0.0059700925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69617283,0.20514967,0.009011593,0.040069655,0.029984014,0.019612208],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3880384,0.0013545783,0.00127047,0.003458608,0.0051622894,0.013333483,0.0076078386,0.0038595046,0.034167442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23604049,0.0014575494,0.0031763662,0.0036055862,0.0033793463,0.014780754,0.040821623,0.011116523,0.00498766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016427808,0.0016228446,0.011696133,0.0055674794,0.00069711474,0.0030437831,0.0966852,0.002299486,0.004181454,0.06416917,0.3906324,0.4177622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043451294,0.000467818,0.010280645,0.0077820644,0.00015016682,0.00051646144,0.05300746,0.0015639879,0.0026734425,0.05701824,0.86577016,0.00033507575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004627543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008442389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3880384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006117995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02215701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7546576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404393661","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4973518","title":"&lt;span&gt;Ontario, Listen Up: Citational Practices in The Ontario Court of Appeal&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Span (engineering); Life span; Appeal; Political science; Engineering; Law; Structural engineering; Gerontology; Medicine","score_opus":0.037797862396898495,"score_gpt":0.35155115464220116,"score_spread":0.3137532922453027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404393661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13788505,0.0051303287,0.00069106236,0.20223501,0.0013419016,0.00026997345,0.002118485,0.00013002231,0.65019816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5262113,0.0024320704,0.0007878785,0.025393551,0.00036388965,0.00016372176,0.00034460705,0.00021458925,0.4440884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939611,0.00069471396,0.00035386815,0.00036566073,0.002704766,0.0019199969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832529,0.0067486577,0.0008383776,0.00044112263,0.0058869156,0.0028320677],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054102526,0.00024059264,0.00037682106,0.0025711467,0.04180532,0.010558383,0.0016665093,0.008560775,0.04122084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04160768,0.000602701,0.00033722306,0.0054979683,0.0055096056,0.0038380981,0.0033497598,0.004331535,0.0029191775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010079246,0.00005424438,0.01839799,0.00013255666,0.000023663739,0.0015589907,0.07965109,0.0001609751,0.0006933276,0.117089346,0.7399185,0.042218544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004228268,0.000022528557,0.08020342,0.00036863278,0.000053830143,0.0002000994,0.09501391,0.0003385863,0.0005874807,0.010128439,0.8128886,0.0001522286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99742883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08200678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12555446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5950036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404469182","doi":"10.29173/alr2803","title":"Edmonton Area Black Undergraduate Students' Intentions and Views Regarding Applying to Law School","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Psychology; Mathematics education; Political science","score_opus":0.0751593882649,"score_gpt":0.42529999803086893,"score_spread":0.35014060976596895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404469182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960259,0.000051665444,0.00002972048,0.00069671543,0.0000059044796,0.000009024446,0.000010820457,0.0000015908751,0.0031686388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931304,0.00023726752,0.0001154047,0.00054973207,0.0000051840298,0.000012454333,0.000024666704,0.000002242957,0.005922559],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858606,0.00033845217,0.000028277213,0.00008956329,0.00053136837,0.00042621425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995249,0.0007955102,0.00076248974,0.00007838738,0.00085563713,0.0022589606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026931034,0.00018856303,0.00025830005,0.0011915705,0.0057000616,0.0032214199,0.0006432548,0.0006950973,0.004892783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004555601,0.00022999059,0.00014241095,0.00073733367,0.0023271723,0.0007158298,0.0017495188,0.0015454855,0.0004062918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008354055,0.000869378,0.6451305,0.00005538517,0.000018393877,0.00051785185,0.293512,0.00009086541,0.002452882,0.0033446986,0.00479559,0.049128972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072750386,0.00020312799,0.462274,0.000099126155,0.000012958525,0.00012339096,0.5252325,0.00018410238,0.00040113446,0.00028864018,0.011149736,0.00002396333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32790667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7107034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67209333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005054137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007982884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6519961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404534635","doi":"10.29242/lawstats.2023","title":"ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 2023","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ARL academic law and medical library statistics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Library science; Academic library; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.028824778185312427,"score_gpt":0.3509910157347867,"score_spread":0.32216623754947427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404534635","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007071531,0.002754797,0.0023248114,0.00615873,0.0021286944,0.00018716976,0.6236908,0.005320521,0.35672724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049667405,0.0048666582,0.004611282,0.0033397472,0.001507504,0.00046037178,0.43589723,0.0024244126,0.541926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635965,0.00026861636,0.00022898166,0.00018509665,0.0027207085,0.00023691141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98596185,0.0026685237,0.0009130006,0.0008611516,0.00900665,0.0005887634],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002073133,0.00096986105,0.00065251545,0.0074049593,0.0011715975,0.0043793395,0.0010816581,0.00091301155,0.124806166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016075669,0.00068517553,0.00053709076,0.020702863,0.0003856937,0.0019749543,0.0009408269,0.0021508273,0.21096496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030646197,0.0000024341714,0.00011370401,0.000015430209,7.1436176e-7,0.0000020763623,0.0000058542337,0.000030472549,0.0000063691386,0.0006614058,0.99210936,0.007049191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037523694,0.0000033001456,0.0019080801,0.00007360139,0.0000017013554,0.000013743987,0.000020263442,0.00012147426,0.000042678214,0.0006134751,0.9971897,0.000008331143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19536854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21210523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005580531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015281221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4175182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404562400","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4976805","title":"Some Reflections of a Métis Law Student and Assistant Professor on Indigenous Legal Education in Canada&amp;nbsp;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal education; Law; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Engineering; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.022902221761463833,"score_gpt":0.4060017546048774,"score_spread":0.3830995328434136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404562400","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045709983,0.0010993924,0.00008441513,0.98370695,0.0059447014,0.000038568236,0.000041032934,0.000010143054,0.0045038625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050911848,0.0018355387,0.00037336757,0.88787234,0.0028551754,0.00009463508,0.000033149718,0.0000931043,0.055930845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96548724,0.01041027,0.0009919482,0.0025690314,0.0058549643,0.014686484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9116832,0.017269531,0.0018365929,0.0005925076,0.011582468,0.057035703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020282885,0.0010991949,0.0012472627,0.001743944,0.10960359,0.02708787,0.008526116,0.07120705,0.016395234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0483271,0.0015530038,0.002022063,0.0021340796,0.028653752,0.011029252,0.014030283,0.10958171,0.0021827132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111515226,0.0003920437,0.003058354,0.00021659289,0.000032611755,0.004518088,0.13349721,0.00025610946,0.0007898276,0.018753428,0.82937354,0.009000818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004994094,0.00009241463,0.004013637,0.0004760615,0.000023314928,0.0003890553,0.4331365,0.0001516458,0.00036339829,0.0022139181,0.5589538,0.00013630698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7714916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8955195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9269082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073091805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17403735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53032064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404590355","doi":"10.1007/978-981-97-5085-6_85","title":"Meeting in the White Space: The Discourse of First Nations Client and Legal Practitioner Relations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White spaces; White (mutation); White paper; Space (punctuation); Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Linguistics; Law; Computer science; Telecommunications; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032732649370273176,"score_gpt":0.36097681510623336,"score_spread":0.32824416573596016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404590355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010987135,0.006162666,0.0018474917,0.10574899,0.0010034567,0.000025707039,0.000020670137,0.000030648986,0.8741733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6068225,0.0045269504,0.0020957144,0.030393617,0.0007478225,0.00023475646,0.000035860372,0.00023220363,0.35491052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98617107,0.0111009795,0.000104941704,0.00046392466,0.0011665573,0.0009924095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902126,0.008151467,0.00024268572,0.0002797062,0.00041062816,0.00070279784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011591329,0.0006877034,0.00056373095,0.0016330532,0.030202964,0.027499164,0.0018322007,0.012483532,0.012249828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01376979,0.000501143,0.00031487565,0.0029120494,0.042950086,0.014882639,0.008539319,0.014955955,0.0012940728],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040687405,0.000010416502,0.000042038795,0.000020160744,9.2148025e-7,0.00007159433,0.08384487,0.000036898586,0.00003484261,0.8958756,0.016662417,0.0033962114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009290935,0.00001767728,0.0004126722,0.0006090544,0.000005357157,0.00015396673,0.21400651,0.00042054185,0.00019636215,0.2851573,0.4989862,0.00002501734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03636112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052419946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9636389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01112323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015840901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08070505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404635481","doi":"10.4324/9781003473404-13","title":"Legal Education and First Nations Teaching and Learning Methodologies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.10114485852844146,"score_gpt":0.4391834204610289,"score_spread":0.3380385619325874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404635481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023065305,0.0068954546,0.0035637948,0.0045286557,0.0004860348,0.00002574564,0.000014056628,0.00005734516,0.9821223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12065203,0.015810262,0.01310478,0.002403707,0.00034482416,0.00023223383,0.000087386186,0.00013429298,0.8472306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988562,0.00071351905,0.00002734984,0.00007001178,0.00022178136,0.00011111866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923587,0.0004437157,0.000048370683,0.000073847004,0.00009753095,0.00010071534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013175068,0.00047463522,0.00018216258,0.0012277552,0.0038030127,0.005972067,0.0006735422,0.0013475053,0.015644684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018174493,0.00015831813,0.00023674313,0.0011257603,0.0060016294,0.0037861085,0.0022089342,0.0033740683,0.0023723328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027316785,0.000022254748,0.00008556081,0.000103679275,0.000001270678,0.00008233633,0.0072415182,0.00015348032,0.000112238704,0.92322063,0.023372732,0.045601666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012980818,0.0000111144445,0.00019404809,0.000256689,0.0000010955637,0.0001775168,0.0019619267,0.00019078239,0.00017830305,0.04259407,0.95442855,0.0000045646834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042932397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012514954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99570674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059929146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033138206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052336752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404682251","doi":"10.1002/9781119880967.ch23","title":"The Valuator as Expert Witness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Expert witness; History; Computer science; Archaeology; Programming language","score_opus":0.057305365356286025,"score_gpt":0.468042303107103,"score_spread":0.410736937750817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404682251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027375692,0.0023742837,0.0060705054,0.0858643,0.0072802966,0.0001780346,0.00009300015,0.00015684431,0.89524513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09774657,0.0025846607,0.005918794,0.07725131,0.0024506669,0.00024190432,0.000078691075,0.00019724948,0.81353015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912888,0.0028982686,0.00049764966,0.001459753,0.0026784937,0.0011770985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892083,0.002622926,0.0004649722,0.0015769533,0.0037996622,0.0023271968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006648525,0.00037947012,0.00046410973,0.00096787955,0.006876776,0.009580157,0.001741549,0.012688786,0.03289786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026677407,0.00039122772,0.00043981173,0.0007310821,0.008419596,0.0076376507,0.005879901,0.008266854,0.0155100105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019767675,0.000021782318,0.000548182,0.00006754257,0.0000032539128,0.00079998444,0.0019304537,0.000070045404,0.0005418208,0.6442802,0.3209639,0.030752959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009671316,0.00001645598,0.00036240366,0.0002340309,0.0000059238646,0.00096369284,0.001915464,0.00016968176,0.00029563886,0.03982837,0.9561784,0.000020348542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017176902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03367778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03289786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051528625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018499857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110054314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405049608","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4982650","title":"Navigating the Current Era of AI Arbitrage: Reimagining Academic Integrity and Assessment in Ontario Secondary Schools","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Arbitrage; Current (fluid); Political science; Business; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Finance; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.04161397451041256,"score_gpt":0.4392034195800189,"score_spread":0.39758944506960636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405049608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52202904,0.0027738845,0.0054252045,0.37805954,0.0005323552,0.00017146012,0.00031328635,0.00018802498,0.0905072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815631,0.00056465116,0.0021137397,0.0033741938,0.00009122016,0.000040604395,0.000060863094,0.000059731,0.012131786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95008194,0.012183014,0.0023255905,0.0032484336,0.019033892,0.01312713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8432971,0.035031226,0.01205524,0.008050396,0.059571505,0.04199452],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043852106,0.00028616737,0.0010062265,0.0036932668,0.038087938,0.026988614,0.005859691,0.006263886,0.010905665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10090657,0.0008083243,0.00064791244,0.006271632,0.028782453,0.012288753,0.020161346,0.009127199,0.00097410695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021804283,0.00025244922,0.12639761,0.000380484,0.000047742662,0.0010136268,0.3169071,0.0015875287,0.00081931625,0.32617033,0.057560816,0.16864498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007047721,0.00015512553,0.15142636,0.0011537866,0.000076359865,0.00036844754,0.3137447,0.0048814374,0.0017000777,0.098071046,0.42807958,0.00027268525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9572131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9780873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20266242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5007042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92479855},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4405178205","doi":"10.4000/12vgj","title":"Les cliniques juridiques : l’expérience canadienne","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses universitaires de Caen eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08813849555426706,"score_gpt":0.3380029707925124,"score_spread":0.24986447523824534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405178205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08205386,0.040809426,0.008960101,0.15055455,0.005015278,0.00022469154,0.0002764655,0.0002839146,0.7118216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5426033,0.026594745,0.004582057,0.020360796,0.0022873704,0.0003803581,0.00018651834,0.000430897,0.40257397],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886557,0.0071213893,0.0002975155,0.00058805186,0.0022566682,0.0010806351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98623186,0.010810899,0.0004672598,0.00045795174,0.0009183345,0.0011137422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008703692,0.0007735408,0.0008967415,0.0035917112,0.016919853,0.017165402,0.002205285,0.008692812,0.02282836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019385463,0.0007819948,0.0005811429,0.0055189203,0.024079049,0.008689834,0.00792526,0.014052392,0.0035564138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003783445,0.00011383762,0.0012137019,0.00033242078,0.00001093296,0.0025669013,0.56799716,0.00025602,0.0003552427,0.2879284,0.07863614,0.060551375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008233394,0.000018272716,0.0010000292,0.0002538572,0.0000033386625,0.00091178174,0.06726608,0.00006793859,0.0001492859,0.010822778,0.9194626,0.00003570861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060126655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11533919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93987334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015043194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017007282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11955339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405359142","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5018397","title":"\"Weaponizing\" The Tort of Family Violence? Myths, Stereotypes, Lawyers' Ethics and Access to Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Mythology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.07574901194883561,"score_gpt":0.4355450685629814,"score_spread":0.3597960566141458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405359142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5018492,0.0032762534,0.0033198001,0.36069745,0.00052974164,0.000020740878,0.000040946252,0.000014899794,0.13025092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940608,0.00034485527,0.00012975631,0.004275257,0.000086924476,0.0000065441463,0.00000324459,0.0000051088887,0.0010875124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98695195,0.009426946,0.000259177,0.00049143855,0.0013391774,0.001531388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746966,0.015539003,0.0047835996,0.0014102902,0.0015005642,0.002070046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014754674,0.00023539242,0.00033759364,0.001750826,0.010480236,0.010914248,0.0014814939,0.006155832,0.0043621855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04336035,0.00036492234,0.0002332457,0.0012649412,0.055405658,0.01122064,0.0046238746,0.0097232675,0.00028449652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052325333,0.00014895371,0.01648022,0.000051306466,0.000027421442,0.00018662946,0.24108776,0.00014532209,0.00019857853,0.7198812,0.0076489253,0.014091288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039011215,0.00005995223,0.018113738,0.000617107,0.000046355068,0.0006187945,0.46792394,0.0005276267,0.00056865474,0.47221953,0.039203748,0.00006152984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013386853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013381595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014754674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004328365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056218887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07803106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405479803","doi":"10.1177/23220058241305560","title":"Legal Education in India: Reflecting on the Past for a Brighter Future","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.035701113182877095,"score_gpt":0.43717639966324,"score_spread":0.4014752864803629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405479803","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043804865,0.01363561,0.00017302395,0.92318356,0.0023587614,0.000011200596,0.00009440806,0.000032214997,0.016706357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80843174,0.025748182,0.0011602163,0.1467494,0.0025012966,0.000030246645,0.00014394641,0.000040836767,0.015194082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412435,0.0015624436,0.0002485539,0.00041771427,0.00095314445,0.0026937763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98046905,0.0040596193,0.0015030644,0.00031679397,0.002706618,0.010944824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004813662,0.00024056234,0.0003780669,0.0014121797,0.010563235,0.012346254,0.0018885047,0.0062555983,0.0104345195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007993759,0.00024411362,0.00042489916,0.0025295217,0.008264747,0.0077975844,0.0065262453,0.0127278585,0.00077253487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001768836,0.0011841655,0.06540419,0.0030994676,0.00005905227,0.0050833398,0.102730736,0.0005323008,0.0024857442,0.20202951,0.36216244,0.25505215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024704454,0.00015510239,0.07577852,0.0021115358,0.000032135402,0.0016823293,0.29994282,0.00035524185,0.0007163365,0.017409563,0.60162365,0.0001681047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06534076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14778481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06534076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016067587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04086004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12992084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405519041","doi":"10.4236/blr.2024.154127","title":"Perception of Justice Delivery in the Court System in Ghana","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Beijing Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Perception; Economic Justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.07699804443303314,"score_gpt":0.41390175758178893,"score_spread":0.3369037131487558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405519041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99731356,0.000121667326,0.000048007303,0.0010589948,0.0000043441746,0.0000052072905,0.000011461837,9.075905e-7,0.0014357972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940515,0.00013532255,0.000029218816,0.00010349313,0.0000029804612,0.0000018697659,0.000005421602,6.375667e-7,0.00031587755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990067,0.00053822633,0.000055312936,0.00005127293,0.0001671031,0.0001814939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659795,0.0008486136,0.001264386,0.000050836516,0.00039316228,0.00084510207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009928487,0.00007240339,0.00016580685,0.0004066394,0.0014077666,0.0010240069,0.0002048414,0.0003445645,0.00454183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005298295,0.00013729664,0.000058484697,0.0005501817,0.0012622367,0.00091246376,0.000606078,0.00054899754,0.0002447559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010748271,0.00023153536,0.57045716,0.00017746694,0.000019981375,0.0026154418,0.38733956,0.0001718852,0.0031621896,0.0021240446,0.0026702029,0.030922962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012821936,0.00026320489,0.43917903,0.00016285865,0.000007839656,0.0009698473,0.5498822,0.00021668304,0.00020497107,0.0004145911,0.008668732,0.000017220003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034496173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048069358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034496173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016023949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00132808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06859082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405659549","doi":"10.29173/isotl800","title":"An OT and PT Explore SoTL: The Start of a Transformative Journey in Decolonizing Curriculum in a School of Rehabilitation Science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Imagining SoTL","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Rehabilitation; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04333970387838407,"score_gpt":0.4328885105014542,"score_spread":0.3895488066230701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405659549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8831256,0.0005767484,0.0061335643,0.05429595,0.00057809503,0.00020993149,0.000063220694,0.00014242371,0.054874424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95612496,0.0007768419,0.006096319,0.0060617086,0.000056213357,0.00010660464,0.000047108875,0.000090506815,0.030639717],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959143,0.0019361596,0.000064522734,0.0002789096,0.00051129895,0.0012947989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99504155,0.0006988653,0.00033098087,0.00017906405,0.00044591384,0.003303735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004806159,0.00032904916,0.00041158652,0.00077856326,0.019457275,0.00768489,0.001920078,0.0031707801,0.0045498936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075187963,0.00032433812,0.0005683039,0.0007974113,0.018225813,0.005231047,0.0154144615,0.009388646,0.00081586686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063670406,0.00078913965,0.007464932,0.00015835695,0.000008144124,0.0017263349,0.8995399,0.00021606141,0.001997624,0.02352761,0.01205491,0.052453406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010466031,0.00021161741,0.0040437905,0.00017700379,0.000006282862,0.00039739846,0.9151618,0.00018023755,0.0006479088,0.0047461647,0.074390925,0.000026440133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049835727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21818978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049835727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012357214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034685537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09909135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405700575","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-56681-3_101","title":"Limits of Consent Education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.13035408207445856,"score_gpt":0.4357227866533086,"score_spread":0.30536870457885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405700575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015033131,0.0022665486,0.00823512,0.013098527,0.0003338062,0.000037332342,0.000027497075,0.00003198465,0.9744658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31408322,0.0035075617,0.0062882137,0.016377062,0.0009854472,0.0006224875,0.00009166611,0.00022583253,0.6578185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863647,0.0065374216,0.00039465286,0.001573189,0.003931289,0.0011987754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854897,0.010626304,0.0003623058,0.0018803626,0.0011738215,0.000467398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010831653,0.0008176811,0.0010783334,0.001426995,0.006078176,0.012893706,0.0026566074,0.010244496,0.024705326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030215096,0.0008514163,0.0006326006,0.0009729498,0.037456278,0.016852932,0.008502114,0.017545803,0.0047584665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017399842,0.0000055218484,0.000012272987,0.000006832503,5.0607605e-7,0.000008103343,0.0003303822,0.00004402034,0.00001049595,0.99319154,0.0036980573,0.0026905248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033358306,0.000003591221,0.00003139225,0.00009056506,0.0000017208122,0.000034262426,0.0002841773,0.0001881528,0.00008551539,0.9296634,0.06960851,0.000005387448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007533185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007962387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024705326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010438189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008880135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0826475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405959047","doi":"10.29173/wclawr119","title":"No Contest Pleas as a Response to False Guilty Pleas","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.060169899870502426,"score_gpt":0.4297966942832729,"score_spread":0.36962679441277047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405959047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06900645,0.0024346467,0.1302308,0.13146526,0.009524467,0.008699126,0.0010221122,0.0018434488,0.64577377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75846153,0.0012619854,0.04983075,0.059929643,0.005327237,0.008473471,0.00039459596,0.00049986417,0.11582092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9345265,0.046438627,0.003418189,0.0022301204,0.009004659,0.0043818164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8469564,0.12659839,0.007999046,0.0066622966,0.008021757,0.0037621667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039207794,0.0009899348,0.0011276889,0.0017106053,0.004620553,0.00669482,0.0021451255,0.01755984,0.03736251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1621266,0.0007336427,0.001315079,0.0011315822,0.0046599666,0.0062328475,0.0047695083,0.012735819,0.0071098227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017211239,0.00087288517,0.0024326288,0.0009252231,0.00011107104,0.002592516,0.0058831624,0.0024122654,0.0036611452,0.6205213,0.2649874,0.09387929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011850229,0.0014198452,0.010734508,0.0017757926,0.00022165022,0.0025951362,0.005879143,0.015814312,0.0036724303,0.24133033,0.7147793,0.0005924869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015343466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034200817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039207794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040396964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032549656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20735317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406095612","doi":"10.5325/weslmethstud.17.1.0104","title":"Our Justice Journeys: Three Centuries of Striving for a Better World","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wesley and Methodist Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; History; Law","score_opus":0.2368833403269247,"score_gpt":0.5457135377945687,"score_spread":0.30883019746764395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406095612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07128952,0.14640687,0.0062305373,0.36868855,0.022431431,0.00017755962,0.00020412053,0.0004209712,0.38415042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67984277,0.0487813,0.004770271,0.053962544,0.005240767,0.0002868349,0.00018484639,0.001120678,0.20580997],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99121594,0.004758891,0.00023397578,0.0004944347,0.0019794826,0.0013173727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930924,0.0029452494,0.00040063795,0.0007249916,0.00075675047,0.002080023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067184726,0.0008450545,0.00089771947,0.0017279948,0.034028035,0.035177384,0.0019423595,0.0051056356,0.0075832927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012452444,0.0007622953,0.00043873512,0.0023971116,0.04272177,0.021258675,0.018200604,0.015896646,0.0017093575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045246776,0.000060003553,0.00045374702,0.00020183215,0.000015090638,0.00043068943,0.5667965,0.000064707834,0.00022178555,0.26789147,0.12519096,0.038628068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047514354,0.000019683788,0.00034840903,0.00039457937,0.0000029919354,0.00016109343,0.15207292,0.000027586944,0.00007925134,0.03135749,0.8155049,0.000026252848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0118105095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03183438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035177384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009904515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012573653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07186264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406268348","doi":"10.4337/9781035302932.ch15","title":"Canada (regulation of legal education)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Legal education; Indigenous; Legal research; Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Ecology","score_opus":0.019834298758379682,"score_gpt":0.28986713939985415,"score_spread":0.2700328406414745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406268348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007304972,0.008613022,0.0003053321,0.0051260083,0.0006722923,0.000038868406,0.00085094187,0.00010877019,0.98355424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012726555,0.0039436026,0.00048207285,0.0032498222,0.000079595586,0.000033762986,0.00041384483,0.00005968978,0.979011],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985416,0.000065344204,0.000023795601,0.00014495892,0.000816231,0.00040809764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994462,0.00005187313,0.000016899496,0.00002755944,0.00034696105,0.000110430105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045295528,0.0006410714,0.00029902192,0.0019122461,0.006917193,0.005347282,0.0010545815,0.0029346894,0.060837828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010697712,0.00034811956,0.0003498741,0.0037029155,0.0027536482,0.0011482195,0.0013003442,0.0023208957,0.010817398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045909237,0.000013585306,0.00023918397,0.000088177854,0.0000014716134,0.000090428766,0.00092014315,0.00022026824,0.00016656857,0.2681091,0.6905733,0.039573178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.1182117e-7,9.956758e-7,0.00038972957,0.00005234084,7.568016e-7,0.000017100201,0.0001320437,0.000032031126,0.000031064,0.0013434462,0.99799573,0.0000040085997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9759517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98929214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9186817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0813183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10846494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59000826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406325040","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9066","title":"JUDGING ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES: OVERSIGHT, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND CITIZEN COMPLAINTS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Public administration; Political science; Administrative law; Citizen science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.16068306877390293,"score_gpt":0.4724398080745329,"score_spread":0.31175673930062997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406325040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88937205,0.0013510473,0.002917508,0.019364273,0.00016038246,0.0002484692,0.00014648419,0.0000471834,0.086392455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995688,0.00015504035,0.00033272593,0.0010965397,0.000054753873,0.000025227277,0.000022954193,0.000006581399,0.0026181408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9571302,0.018994374,0.0015876812,0.00229611,0.01306475,0.006926808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7566109,0.120023325,0.05043254,0.0059229224,0.057436988,0.009573317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032206718,0.00029882413,0.00042997772,0.0032731441,0.0123277195,0.01154554,0.0019351249,0.0027983526,0.0036927075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13645981,0.00030787746,0.00035592113,0.004081238,0.012322298,0.0035436181,0.0031664502,0.0037731417,0.00033222116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030197934,0.00031858284,0.6507982,0.00026452003,0.0001004228,0.001961006,0.19291744,0.0013552768,0.0006761974,0.05133755,0.024502346,0.07546651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046903766,0.00014350867,0.7722365,0.0004145275,0.000079004894,0.00044553366,0.15476002,0.0033747866,0.00055228075,0.01008908,0.05771656,0.00014129617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68478364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82250446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31521636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045434322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04635122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63414544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326516","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.8359","title":"Exploring the Importance of Criminal Legal Aid: A Canadian Perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Criminal procedure; Humanities; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2401937323696118,"score_gpt":0.4306052977341825,"score_spread":0.19041156536457068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05320018,0.06352607,0.0010244518,0.3751419,0.001370106,0.00010098284,0.0011287323,0.00004499925,0.5044626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78488505,0.12479467,0.003009539,0.031555213,0.00048453128,0.00006197899,0.00044580363,0.0000772824,0.054685935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99257517,0.0010289937,0.00018755638,0.00044390254,0.0026030475,0.0031614064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98968863,0.0021436024,0.00052484043,0.00016068488,0.0043303594,0.0031518745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005020302,0.00059676176,0.0008046481,0.0063873036,0.019599237,0.012494634,0.0027384118,0.0033613862,0.015146432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012515845,0.0004355043,0.0006267551,0.011454578,0.0129983695,0.0050858194,0.0046669496,0.0059924005,0.0005511963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007570464,0.00008955517,0.013100431,0.0009856082,0.00004388147,0.0012901252,0.026284534,0.00110566,0.0003840238,0.77265257,0.09314441,0.090843506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040961768,0.00006919068,0.045378514,0.0035091932,0.00011573873,0.0007710403,0.09535348,0.0013662766,0.00033720204,0.051243782,0.8015606,0.0002539955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99856865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24261585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24261585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37856376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87845826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326534","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9184","title":"Access to Administrative Justice as an Administrative Law Value: Designing an Inclusive and Accessible Administrative Justice System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Administrative law; Tribunal; Equity (law); Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Law; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1772834996338298,"score_gpt":0.5093142697938282,"score_spread":0.3320307701599984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23347965,0.0016904704,0.12694179,0.05292806,0.00027856196,0.0010425547,0.00007727895,0.0002933563,0.5832683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528009,0.0005717246,0.030826585,0.0014695998,0.000038296766,0.0001950733,0.000020997988,0.000052005627,0.014024879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879946,0.005454569,0.00025028162,0.00055079657,0.0025615839,0.0031881551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99416536,0.001775093,0.00038924103,0.0004338332,0.0010216678,0.0022148232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008182607,0.00035357106,0.00044078103,0.0014880898,0.023252163,0.019449772,0.0025573315,0.0027055857,0.0034691524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010337095,0.00044602828,0.0005207242,0.0013805013,0.036794674,0.006943496,0.013691068,0.0036301923,0.00046125223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013614635,0.00009422227,0.0048243273,0.0001135987,0.000016273045,0.0005429592,0.08916225,0.003525476,0.0009384817,0.8621539,0.0035645491,0.035050265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041094234,0.00013026869,0.011292947,0.0007276163,0.00009770855,0.00044897906,0.1837292,0.008244659,0.0012958372,0.45285,0.34100857,0.00013316626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49131805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68445086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49131805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045932867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11263476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9769165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406523653","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0004","title":"When judges are not judging","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.024763917333902312,"score_gpt":0.3087551784044162,"score_spread":0.28399126107051387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406523653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10520033,0.0055194665,0.017570198,0.17363109,0.010794647,0.00019452447,0.0001369161,0.0003324646,0.6866203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90549463,0.0012795526,0.004734492,0.041723173,0.0014516484,0.00013834833,0.000109870576,0.00031131523,0.044756994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91214925,0.03218116,0.004233965,0.011609252,0.029566193,0.01026022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91177636,0.02902041,0.007876932,0.00782203,0.034808937,0.008695372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033972897,0.0003679661,0.0010464041,0.0014127292,0.013341923,0.01741304,0.0026484935,0.009056373,0.006339414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17495866,0.0008022586,0.00045943816,0.0018374431,0.02554714,0.009604207,0.0068611843,0.0124238795,0.0028157025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013400086,0.000055667035,0.014903273,0.00040978653,0.00008604342,0.0020371713,0.12950176,0.0002581075,0.0018927803,0.5646107,0.20561364,0.08049699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053958138,0.00007675283,0.0072501986,0.00090507086,0.00009128447,0.0010824199,0.08088155,0.00053848926,0.0019048039,0.21456519,0.69247174,0.00017857025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022459708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046885032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033972897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066400245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016652456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17966801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406568919","doi":"10.1016/s1521-6136(00)80044-5","title":"10.1016/s1521-6136(00)80044-5","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Franchise; Business; Legal service; Law and economics; Law; Marketing; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.02551660855024614,"score_gpt":0.27177744483322386,"score_spread":0.2462608362829777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406568919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019795678,0.00025378092,0.00041194123,0.0002012898,0.00015441344,0.00006391613,0.00042034657,0.0005462828,0.9977502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002470036,0.00011204497,0.0001720519,0.00010206091,0.00002487262,0.000034385743,0.00016561967,0.00009912727,0.9990428],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999393,0.00004926317,0.00004067828,0.00020902185,0.00019066207,0.000117485906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985459,0.0004027806,0.000084839674,0.00019767604,0.0003148538,0.00045394583],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010324888,0.0027532133,0.0014906037,0.0024498305,0.0025866674,0.004233475,0.0029122115,0.0056074033,0.98786455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016298743,0.0010388809,0.0012090432,0.0024555824,0.0019764258,0.005465956,0.004178038,0.0022938934,0.9908217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018690265,0.00015091429,0.0004902099,0.000505596,0.00001839491,0.00014892213,0.00011897159,0.00026493863,0.0013207083,0.007505621,0.42731413,0.56197464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002808114,0.0000651191,0.00040346166,0.00027083815,0.000006918977,0.00015449298,0.000092302485,0.00010665409,0.0001847946,0.0006562821,0.9980166,0.000014563678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055118585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007815167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012135446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015004462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001394026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017309725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406731095","doi":"10.23912/9781915097415-5861","title":"Ethics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Goodfellow Publishers eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.10702178542296618,"score_gpt":0.3805693031319851,"score_spread":0.2735475177090189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406731095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011050634,0.009511055,0.005334916,0.05698125,0.0034080753,0.00012623306,0.00019040331,0.00009961679,0.9232434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12219096,0.008611149,0.006665603,0.06160611,0.0035875184,0.000577127,0.00031538593,0.00026295136,0.7961832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918325,0.0043642456,0.000406968,0.0008171913,0.002005209,0.0005739314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969817,0.0011347431,0.00022071316,0.0005519516,0.0008766474,0.00023421348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004793979,0.0007377639,0.00045352583,0.00063563057,0.004998778,0.006266867,0.0010700265,0.005582847,0.022683963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075005675,0.00031909073,0.0003410649,0.0007208652,0.016493721,0.004693113,0.0040259506,0.0071180677,0.015729608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059243775,0.000008277419,0.00006279524,0.00007353938,0.0000027033752,0.000038559283,0.002913053,0.0000498184,0.000077758676,0.8225488,0.16089831,0.013320417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029310806,0.0000045112747,0.000082905244,0.00019685403,0.0000010492954,0.00008607661,0.00069003354,0.000039216528,0.000056634835,0.091880366,0.9069543,0.000005115309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036933091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004358811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022683963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037195631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005902062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407222285","doi":"10.59962/9780774870757-004","title":"2 Building a Law Firm: The First Decade in Montreal","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.026282139443368456,"score_gpt":0.25884516207472746,"score_spread":0.232563022631359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407222285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067211516,0.019074539,0.0018429913,0.093351625,0.0011660095,0.0002536929,0.0013466817,0.00023841744,0.81551456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2904372,0.0051688524,0.0013070321,0.0068990174,0.00016514675,0.0000590116,0.00023047946,0.0001267125,0.6956066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981572,0.00023992773,0.000026984637,0.00020265189,0.00053428055,0.00083894003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981509,0.00024594262,0.00009247756,0.000058726844,0.00047111273,0.0009808355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013397607,0.00045018786,0.00029673436,0.0012982239,0.013324684,0.011143172,0.0018981753,0.0033399248,0.052532483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003684564,0.0006446633,0.0002375834,0.0032537559,0.006056939,0.0037699312,0.0031199178,0.004469733,0.0022121377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045339195,0.00013714866,0.0064016865,0.0001405334,0.00001111848,0.0009499897,0.013854897,0.00057735905,0.0006020579,0.5856897,0.2773164,0.1142738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012307148,0.000024273313,0.01265579,0.00011437414,0.000006036576,0.000056862864,0.0060840584,0.00024887777,0.00028029698,0.0041416953,0.9763507,0.00002469983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9745095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99309254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0957426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0957426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.120246395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6946644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407555645","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-83483-7_3","title":"Values and Ethics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.12294717545024705,"score_gpt":0.4520533937475798,"score_spread":0.3291062182973328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407555645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035631013,0.002433053,0.0013604604,0.0046455692,0.0003821866,0.00002012725,0.000019980183,0.000012296292,0.99077004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027437592,0.0020840836,0.0011682381,0.0044187973,0.0004734779,0.00010065431,0.000042624837,0.00006688654,0.9642076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998669,0.0006897087,0.00002983427,0.00012362128,0.00035789824,0.00012986187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992767,0.0003970053,0.000029140987,0.000085796215,0.00014432611,0.000066975095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015260029,0.00076741923,0.00046413188,0.001184144,0.004708178,0.007956705,0.0008971688,0.004399039,0.032020595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025556316,0.00035649622,0.0002236282,0.0010899771,0.013581333,0.0055020787,0.002641286,0.006583251,0.009570371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000141197,0.000008495729,0.00001424445,0.000013912101,6.3430946e-7,0.00001365356,0.0008850748,0.00004712763,0.00002122289,0.9522742,0.040507656,0.0062123816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027945268,0.000003883185,0.00005693372,0.00013508901,0.0000011530161,0.000035314053,0.00076333375,0.000102041166,0.000058123063,0.41406962,0.5847674,0.00000426495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009918796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022686701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032020595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006274283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004855233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10711956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407613621","doi":"10.1186/s40468-025-00341-4","title":"Correction: Lessons from the Chinese imperial examination system","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Testing in Asia","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Imperial examination; Linguistics; Psychology; Language education; Mathematics education; History; Philosophy; Ancient history","score_opus":0.027878936346111008,"score_gpt":0.3862787152161436,"score_spread":0.3583997788700326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407613621","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017176581,0.0013786615,0.0013794223,0.507303,0.46701515,0.000049569302,0.0011436468,0.0003881417,0.019624777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1240414,0.0051494245,0.006060999,0.30288768,0.24757698,0.00030936068,0.0009775601,0.00095593306,0.3120407],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411124,0.001275682,0.0010788061,0.0007751723,0.002063374,0.00069581624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9420259,0.017374506,0.0023394397,0.0043715322,0.031260174,0.0026285737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066004153,0.00096369284,0.0009668906,0.0022859091,0.004257204,0.003973119,0.003448761,0.010052881,0.025105095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14082298,0.000568132,0.0006096326,0.002327006,0.0049274554,0.0029162546,0.0021905932,0.014331721,0.010013816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003069373,0.0000033089718,0.00042324155,0.00006778509,0.000011653981,0.0006046528,0.0005055478,0.000047446527,0.000017972932,0.009326881,0.9818942,0.0070666675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056174005,0.000012667238,0.0026157468,0.00045606447,0.000034994144,0.0010240247,0.0007930656,0.00042065346,0.00024816688,0.006787663,0.98748624,0.00006443625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09448743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08764252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09448743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069408864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011634243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18787491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407871582","doi":"10.1108/rcf-03-2024-0083","title":"Issuing Equity in the Face of Bad News","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Corporate Finance","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Equity (law); Business; Internet privacy; Advertising; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.13579858016225888,"score_gpt":0.47217795692280834,"score_spread":0.33637937676054946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407871582","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019303208,0.63040906,0.0016694292,0.29306138,0.010422313,0.000028998656,0.0000915924,0.000047996364,0.044966076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3742294,0.5196014,0.00084922585,0.050285794,0.04391335,0.000025526582,0.00011757781,0.000030869942,0.010946797],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99402773,0.0023307998,0.00032575443,0.00025746576,0.0023450318,0.0007131673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9559129,0.03061513,0.0059861545,0.00090500584,0.0053429455,0.0012379204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010733927,0.00022651104,0.00066541275,0.0021355879,0.00081757514,0.0068838364,0.0009166224,0.007139452,0.0032972642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055701412,0.0001795581,0.00032827366,0.0015997293,0.0045779673,0.004847125,0.0013270373,0.0049651,0.00059372425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019918232,0.0001305795,0.0064471713,0.0017812741,0.000144671,0.00093334983,0.001097431,0.0008495487,0.00050003495,0.1882702,0.16571943,0.6339272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010215435,0.00020473324,0.01689981,0.006805596,0.00012957411,0.001262801,0.0023913505,0.0014957155,0.0012722672,0.13081567,0.83854735,0.00007297398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020809497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024963003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010733927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022686224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004008616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056767166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407929348","doi":"10.5539/jel.v14n3p328","title":"The Structure and Implementation Strategies of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Courses in Legal Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Problem-based learning; Psychology; Teaching method; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.012579455731613728,"score_gpt":0.41428186003585094,"score_spread":0.4017024043042372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407929348","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14975291,0.5304635,0.21065678,0.02006255,0.0011141158,0.011177438,0.00047808254,0.0004012288,0.075893335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4454015,0.22742164,0.31424087,0.0033121938,0.0001804731,0.005070385,0.000400478,0.000073284624,0.0038990944],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.983979,0.010682324,0.0016435768,0.00087355747,0.002444575,0.00037697898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742268,0.020364301,0.0022173051,0.00073404895,0.0021184636,0.0003391482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016445253,0.0005806689,0.0006680969,0.0030682744,0.00077587366,0.0029427917,0.0015336762,0.0012668396,0.0017677038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04508775,0.0004367772,0.0008569958,0.002629391,0.0012807376,0.004184409,0.0018535692,0.0016045781,0.0005123983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043243173,0.00035103067,0.0024744407,0.017288035,0.000103951264,0.0000750246,0.0033499717,0.00091889856,0.0009219704,0.010994185,0.0009741528,0.96250504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010991086,0.005705165,0.042303946,0.2187905,0.0026783205,0.0034188745,0.024222478,0.011040031,0.022831144,0.102739684,0.5648215,0.00034930446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013844986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035178864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016445253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026830137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010838154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08697182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407948847","doi":"10.21428/f1f23564.964ac1a5","title":"Right Managements of your Rights Management: Ethical Curation and the SpokenWeb UAlberta Collection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IDEAH","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.016548270295251886,"score_gpt":0.3794641094999642,"score_spread":0.36291583920471226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407948847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026516272,0.006061427,0.049392387,0.14935403,0.0019120311,0.00050870277,0.00074885937,0.0011297872,0.7643766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45951203,0.0047085197,0.073247135,0.025760803,0.0008426258,0.00091289217,0.0010301879,0.0026508495,0.43133497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9539783,0.029060906,0.0022943846,0.0019382148,0.010313399,0.0024147527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89394593,0.06505897,0.0032109516,0.018017862,0.01519244,0.0045738257],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041739058,0.00036821628,0.0006898554,0.007050681,0.016836703,0.028314913,0.0019709049,0.004607794,0.03288138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10254792,0.0009950901,0.000553774,0.0043193162,0.022570625,0.020731049,0.017687377,0.008348804,0.0056850314],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003481855,0.00006624537,0.0010293311,0.0001707719,0.0000097667935,0.00013593094,0.02630183,0.00009595519,0.00047246387,0.77538264,0.10054719,0.095753044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013321142,0.000014262146,0.002149693,0.0014040505,0.000018716582,0.00018204137,0.022774106,0.0006104261,0.0015458687,0.16627495,0.80493397,0.00007864915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069789395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11850847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98620534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013794645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03923549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2207399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408037702","doi":"10.1017/s1472669624000550","title":"Indigenous Legal Materials and Libraries: One Canadian Law Library's Experience","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law library; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02032287219458814,"score_gpt":0.29486302554967975,"score_spread":0.27454015335509163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408037702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41642085,0.01191213,0.001240108,0.21110831,0.0016482346,0.00031961995,0.00038297687,0.00035071847,0.35661706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8400798,0.010675929,0.0016271404,0.03621854,0.00033088776,0.00010744761,0.00018442217,0.0003232955,0.11045272],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829061,0.004613402,0.00033700585,0.00066028495,0.0057551824,0.0057279603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749179,0.0075220754,0.0007216022,0.00070735876,0.0059894347,0.010141611],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010591379,0.00056891335,0.00081933185,0.0040841037,0.12443747,0.02424169,0.0052061146,0.0067705913,0.016613077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022179501,0.0009215202,0.0006113141,0.0116873635,0.02867205,0.009502915,0.018455794,0.009076391,0.0012653032],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063085514,0.0001860847,0.0038620152,0.00020821685,0.000015914839,0.0030429293,0.890083,0.000114547496,0.00024854715,0.019334903,0.04925669,0.033584096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010479793,0.000035463232,0.0027146921,0.00016261161,0.000014232767,0.000513918,0.70528823,0.00005263295,0.00013537418,0.0010186865,0.28999633,0.000057341433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9712385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99145585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9757583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13314918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26118946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9660694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408099999","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.185","title":"How Should Professional Resistance Be Integrated Into Conceptions of Professional Accountability?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The AMA Journal of Ethic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"South Health Campus","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Resistance (ecology); Professional development; Professional studies; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.10354525269059169,"score_gpt":0.477410464537555,"score_spread":0.3738652118469633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408099999","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04081953,0.004955231,0.1419667,0.63893074,0.0032412517,0.00030999776,0.00003083838,0.00026817888,0.16947754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9365572,0.0016805271,0.03056895,0.023910325,0.0011896794,0.00043345004,0.00002833758,0.0001339495,0.005497453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85784423,0.091380805,0.0076297177,0.0077908994,0.026799208,0.008555116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7851909,0.120332874,0.027109755,0.018446442,0.03357796,0.015342085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12263794,0.0008860045,0.0015893884,0.0058265957,0.012843056,0.022708587,0.005278076,0.013282616,0.002126884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18631108,0.0009886901,0.0016707185,0.0019758765,0.12722866,0.040985625,0.016989442,0.025163086,0.0006014222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016414742,0.000052929965,0.00221798,0.00009814904,0.000019397448,0.000082673425,0.0364337,0.00040105745,0.00009684076,0.94470614,0.0028834832,0.012991219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027279439,0.00007338874,0.001643138,0.00055431004,0.000021332182,0.0002450153,0.018628802,0.0012782129,0.0001928663,0.9403392,0.036895532,0.000100870755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011208546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009362703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12263794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016802575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034874305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6485792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408163024","doi":"10.4324/9781003458821-13","title":"When ‘Legally Good Enough’ Is Not Enough","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.05827610065519335,"score_gpt":0.36383452444190967,"score_spread":0.3055584237867163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408163024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008805449,0.0068311663,0.003119081,0.22570704,0.0035412698,0.000040842802,0.000057734305,0.00008826312,0.7518091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.474937,0.005842782,0.0028795009,0.13975865,0.00145691,0.00008453796,0.0001772214,0.00022652527,0.3746368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851895,0.0042370283,0.0003576575,0.0012379366,0.006050152,0.002927792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928981,0.002341853,0.0004291911,0.00054097717,0.0028472543,0.0009426779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008002335,0.00034832655,0.0005858989,0.0008760698,0.016846176,0.017727122,0.0017831721,0.008937409,0.008165581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017817436,0.0003846894,0.000311252,0.0011139966,0.051268104,0.012880131,0.00550796,0.0130085945,0.0025219005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000497417,0.000009033641,0.00032463533,0.00004301439,0.000003504398,0.00019970203,0.03581823,0.00003536584,0.00011614086,0.8554647,0.09627204,0.011708599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036125145,0.000009834153,0.00047327284,0.00033607343,0.0000075009466,0.00020915631,0.028969426,0.00005398818,0.00015479006,0.08500456,0.88475585,0.000022008318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29468712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41283348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29468712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022763558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043782692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5859437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408868102","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340112","title":"Forensic DNA Expert Evidence in the South African Context","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); International law; Forensic science; Political science; Law; Biology; Genetics; Paleontology","score_opus":0.15831049403218284,"score_gpt":0.4367864050471854,"score_spread":0.2784759110150026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408868102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40017378,0.07006497,0.010703476,0.33315977,0.0023347859,0.00041719605,0.0005450491,0.00005570027,0.18254516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954749,0.018219203,0.005012036,0.01213286,0.0004524505,0.000106257394,0.000087881206,0.0000254841,0.009214766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947903,0.0028254522,0.0004385611,0.00041475333,0.00068356027,0.00084746996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883007,0.0069827223,0.0017647193,0.00047196326,0.0013603189,0.0011196802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073677506,0.00030626968,0.00033961717,0.0030759063,0.0057558436,0.0046185227,0.0011021969,0.0030255127,0.0155937085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018245911,0.00040967818,0.00017046156,0.0029580803,0.0077049057,0.0028132068,0.007607208,0.0024858497,0.0008852037],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022162985,0.00014487786,0.043044183,0.004822274,0.000110097615,0.094784915,0.13973697,0.000926909,0.005798048,0.45805666,0.035084493,0.21726897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033413435,0.00008051275,0.030956132,0.009779428,0.00007409702,0.0358371,0.14565296,0.00065802905,0.0019046831,0.10254351,0.672381,0.00009917302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008731061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011234471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0155937085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041168206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012148131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052166164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408999913","doi":"10.7202/1117014ar","title":"Melvin Eisenberg, 'Legal Reasoning'","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04459649605821138,"score_gpt":0.4383971400522156,"score_spread":0.3938006439940042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408999913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058363244,0.20826073,0.003002336,0.7639071,0.012511858,0.000026960817,0.00009558959,0.00004885816,0.011562879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07021546,0.18011889,0.00934302,0.65963316,0.041533142,0.00045753646,0.00012903378,0.00021175841,0.03835799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817083,0.008870457,0.0013954516,0.0019518301,0.005317698,0.00075632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9451318,0.047617517,0.0013920418,0.0011513224,0.0038903707,0.0008169933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025245879,0.00092122337,0.0013771049,0.003953381,0.0032887002,0.007845018,0.0026426632,0.020895476,0.0041814256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07533996,0.00092196185,0.0006139077,0.0043191374,0.015407855,0.015879372,0.002627858,0.013495064,0.001381812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002220997,0.000022099446,0.00023191594,0.00044670195,0.000033824166,0.000089527086,0.0014410643,0.00015712,0.00007017666,0.51442385,0.46621984,0.01684158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084136715,0.000016469688,0.00079400407,0.0010529348,0.000029597642,0.00008663382,0.0007928184,0.0003212005,0.00021683991,0.49908254,0.49747515,0.000047695044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020388996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026933873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025245879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009507305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009099325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13351452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409006083","doi":"10.59962/9780774870672","title":"After Redress","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020653340701530746,"score_gpt":0.2544376523225743,"score_spread":0.23378431162104357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409006083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00274269,0.011428503,0.00082038826,0.024855403,0.007845184,0.000050908784,0.00011034358,0.00018295231,0.9519636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007742445,0.0022053798,0.00028355024,0.0038358544,0.00031183654,0.000011630968,0.000043043063,0.00008631775,0.98548],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998985,0.00012736308,0.000020177458,0.0001226522,0.0004931146,0.0002517543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993017,0.000095858486,0.000022542501,0.00007235116,0.00040130838,0.000106237305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079210993,0.0006576756,0.00035870893,0.0011089197,0.011267433,0.007580523,0.000888982,0.0020786657,0.044775795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018363075,0.00031581847,0.0004766199,0.001440794,0.0049089496,0.0040066764,0.0027570154,0.0045732716,0.012996265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016604565,0.000014086816,0.00024519334,0.000081759295,0.0000031506363,0.0002117508,0.012602866,0.000043932745,0.00023446814,0.15563227,0.7692122,0.061701845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.518577e-7,0.0000022454894,0.00017254868,0.00003482026,0.0000015947737,0.000051487263,0.0020427993,0.000011628263,0.000046963232,0.0012956675,0.9963361,0.0000032602768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3212527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54693365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6787473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0109873265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009360505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6387656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409328116","doi":"10.36834/cmej.81283","title":"Royal College exams, examined","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Medical Education Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0234947573221635,"score_gpt":0.3513419708500286,"score_spread":0.3278472135278651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409328116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008002628,0.007382695,0.00009564546,0.31200576,0.020330552,0.0005671791,0.008298624,0.00033233262,0.64298457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035001036,0.0043871845,0.00010467104,0.07889085,0.0049776766,0.00016463641,0.0015940721,0.000080191334,0.87479967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858725,0.00011106247,0.000116250914,0.00021885657,0.00050709536,0.00045944354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713635,0.00021412739,0.00018962893,0.000117397154,0.0013679401,0.0009746532],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004858308,0.00052966346,0.00048504095,0.001331786,0.0034472274,0.0014569812,0.0011942699,0.005822336,0.18560836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011202376,0.00038424923,0.0003750324,0.0008489734,0.0006104643,0.0013315439,0.0013856957,0.0051077697,0.09873152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003521897,0.000035850913,0.0006153646,0.000035191977,0.000002113084,0.0016108154,0.00006756586,0.000022992182,0.00008188063,0.0005606767,0.99015325,0.0067791315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006688262,0.000077937235,0.011781518,0.0003563379,0.0000072918997,0.0018093338,0.00043538207,0.0000713283,0.00012586152,0.00088557904,0.9843523,0.000030243635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052924514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10446218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99951416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004073955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004840048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62092185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409374391","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-15888-9.00008-x","title":"Ethics: what are the impacts of what’s been learned?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.07165557521735409,"score_gpt":0.38636332067843215,"score_spread":0.31470774546107805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409374391","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044944496,0.10894175,0.005267451,0.4958186,0.008040625,0.000029168381,0.00007596625,0.000051461226,0.3772805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37539926,0.18887575,0.009927727,0.18631434,0.018637653,0.00021172172,0.00015371453,0.00027805704,0.22020182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930606,0.0044793366,0.000107982116,0.00026066176,0.001669261,0.00042214183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98268926,0.012806352,0.00045850745,0.00067055924,0.0021036442,0.0012716632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103640715,0.00053639116,0.0006209204,0.00090612273,0.0022615078,0.011118243,0.0009709922,0.0049054385,0.016851582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01475428,0.00023453555,0.00039209673,0.0009209601,0.023169594,0.0113865025,0.0022991453,0.008184402,0.002911947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014366804,0.00006693241,0.000321048,0.00044901104,0.000022356735,0.000086997956,0.0025094808,0.00034197388,0.00016468708,0.7788756,0.114854895,0.10229256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010562197,0.000022713371,0.00060423784,0.0018580143,0.000007908343,0.00009240938,0.00325074,0.00022533102,0.00019380913,0.62910247,0.364612,0.00001983001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003259401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055812406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016851582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058212867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008226028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056374133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409483009","doi":"10.53555/sfs.v10i1.3540","title":"A Study Of Advt To Know Effect Of Emotional Appeal.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Appeal to emotion; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.25322991681820756,"score_gpt":0.4282699626880181,"score_spread":0.17504004586981053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409483009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87180865,0.0013764027,0.0013718547,0.0014285854,0.00046931856,0.00045567765,0.0004817521,0.00006500459,0.12254271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384863,0.000684439,0.0016208427,0.0026039788,0.00018527824,0.0003655124,0.00037464302,0.000047995254,0.05563106],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991391,0.00029421068,0.000044377466,0.00013113383,0.0003435112,0.000047648864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99339384,0.004689335,0.00039775192,0.00046879976,0.00054444664,0.0005057447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015106982,0.00017766566,0.00024578272,0.00058753375,0.00052566425,0.0011443321,0.00047398938,0.0006407858,0.023092622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015884567,0.00013504349,0.00040596543,0.00039928086,0.0008202638,0.0009801077,0.0008503088,0.0014758995,0.0027766584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011711389,0.026929619,0.13679764,0.0025510308,0.00039124643,0.0051829307,0.06018934,0.0004943059,0.07714946,0.04658627,0.016213374,0.61580336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016768073,0.025823249,0.6985599,0.00047298236,0.0004402819,0.006113312,0.023427991,0.0019052001,0.0154621005,0.035003185,0.19098455,0.00013052869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001008724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005611548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023092622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038364055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044405455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07725251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409603222","doi":"10.22329/jtl.v19i1.9396","title":"Teaching Humanities &amp; Social Science: Teaching &amp; Learning Across Australia 8th Edition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Sociology; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.08170930984417654,"score_gpt":0.46454940745156603,"score_spread":0.38284009760738946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409603222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008107498,0.27437195,0.009772965,0.025596965,0.015005733,0.00030937078,0.000539947,0.000867017,0.6654286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019311927,0.098506585,0.00555683,0.0034953377,0.0010123664,0.00017617657,0.00034277106,0.00021379403,0.87138426],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959904,0.000057434438,0.00002592872,0.000026758853,0.00025477668,0.000035985042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927527,0.00015111486,0.00008359948,0.00004700655,0.00027853076,0.00016446642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071819365,0.00048881274,0.0005111624,0.0013601423,0.0010317434,0.0030440614,0.0005151552,0.0008768331,0.040305633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019397129,0.0003443553,0.00027196863,0.001999533,0.001010813,0.0024364232,0.0015827963,0.0015914714,0.010208924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000106088055,0.00005284877,0.00028981682,0.0013721354,0.0000059685285,0.00010149601,0.003709264,0.00020477471,0.000938294,0.022403833,0.4308209,0.54009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010131041,0.000013930256,0.0015629025,0.00049352064,0.0000018055435,0.00012148592,0.0003957882,0.00006648783,0.00008676347,0.0016517272,0.9956006,0.0000038471894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02292123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055824395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040305633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026490905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0079866005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13483584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409644678","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5213866","title":"Thinking Like a Practicing Lawyer as a Legal Research Methodology&amp;nbsp;","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Legal ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Medical education; Engineering","score_opus":0.1991904193241279,"score_gpt":0.551081312368497,"score_spread":0.3518908930443691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409644678","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020270333,0.0022083241,0.012421707,0.63980055,0.00417148,0.00035118402,0.00027482267,0.00027752743,0.3202241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34859848,0.004159543,0.04203341,0.17651728,0.0015385144,0.0012721114,0.00023206869,0.0003974931,0.4252511],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97961044,0.013723353,0.00078031316,0.0017411009,0.003134805,0.0010100267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94859195,0.023567514,0.0025307494,0.002947714,0.009961257,0.012400803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024565157,0.00027001358,0.00041970008,0.0012188664,0.013737914,0.017722622,0.0014435276,0.0080803195,0.051826984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056413468,0.0004608042,0.0002411737,0.00137732,0.011878739,0.01093064,0.0055021285,0.008464055,0.010911988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038064532,0.0003961673,0.0062571056,0.00038181606,0.00001683409,0.00028118587,0.037748955,0.0002082611,0.0013714149,0.3758742,0.38807043,0.1893556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004436534,0.00011313496,0.004944349,0.0014604641,0.000019687302,0.00055464957,0.06647999,0.00064958376,0.0010446669,0.2366086,0.6880398,0.00004063055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0095236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026849397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051826984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00719359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03597178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17337853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409650394","doi":"10.63485/yftaw-k7j03","title":"Wiki on world law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.11757164828808832,"score_gpt":0.46788867214851554,"score_spread":0.35031702386042723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409650394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009235824,0.012105402,0.054299463,0.01266996,0.011852617,0.00041591303,0.23060864,0.034083974,0.63472813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04745033,0.016255276,0.079631485,0.004725651,0.0052985335,0.0008149047,0.4344692,0.01140695,0.39994764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994023,0.000112129535,0.000070976705,0.00008518594,0.00028352614,0.00004586273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641186,0.0015716765,0.00022570051,0.00054153946,0.00064891775,0.00060037186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007763595,0.0010718942,0.0007115795,0.009065445,0.0019902864,0.0055405637,0.0007963394,0.001064063,0.0513944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006941438,0.00037405334,0.00031809323,0.008748188,0.00069510756,0.009632833,0.0041765203,0.0021392228,0.019833233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022135477,0.00003817503,0.00036811418,0.00038057708,0.000013551601,0.00009998639,0.00040572768,0.00043563236,0.00035882735,0.035895985,0.868475,0.09350621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037921416,0.0000029608664,0.00042862745,0.0001040825,0.0000033815122,0.00007325144,0.00010329065,0.00043556592,0.00012660504,0.007788018,0.99092203,0.000008467348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007942937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024262045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0513944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010847698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023926313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17193139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409657810","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/6zs5g_v1","title":"Mindfulness and Legal Practice: A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Mindfulness Meditation and Stress Reduction in Lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mindfulness; Meditation; Mindfulness meditation; Stress reduction; Mindfulness-based stress reduction; Psychology; Psychotherapist; Stress (linguistics); Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.02430525871158278,"score_gpt":0.3796549004947345,"score_spread":0.3553496417831517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409657810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99817634,0.00014191165,0.00027944022,0.0001894845,0.000006956762,0.00025271985,0.000007309888,0.0000025076417,0.00094334554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950389,0.0004990642,0.0024138477,0.00032493906,0.000037903766,0.0004275694,0.000021124828,0.0000031114225,0.0012333627],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929404,0.00035623598,0.000036727764,0.00007908654,0.00011576611,0.0001181298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977155,0.0015483918,0.000152217,0.00011235086,0.00011450956,0.00035700333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012381934,0.00016541885,0.00031463828,0.0003748528,0.0011945127,0.00049598276,0.0004112092,0.0008170626,0.0027999498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034903833,0.00025719174,0.00029104715,0.00022891097,0.0007521989,0.0006215335,0.00070112594,0.0013260974,0.00019754615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008549504,0.17623082,0.09901871,0.0023547937,0.00023146838,0.0020330204,0.14862004,0.00042048152,0.16345343,0.002213844,0.0009241957,0.39594975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003242401,0.18573472,0.7312437,0.00044343306,0.00032835663,0.0017238007,0.034352593,0.0016915809,0.025353298,0.0019173004,0.01388083,0.0000879072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016543423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032207477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027999498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030083943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00103375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00936681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409674543","doi":"10.3138/cjwl-04-x","title":"The Murky Circumstances of Consent in Canada: A Commentary on <i>R. v Kirkpatrick</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027221916312663245,"score_gpt":0.29954327072214665,"score_spread":0.2723213544094834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409674543","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005034788,0.024578271,0.00032037427,0.93264395,0.0045436984,0.000029303254,0.00011198963,0.000020207457,0.032717496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18538152,0.018038403,0.0006243797,0.7761112,0.005668887,0.000064982945,0.0000550574,0.00007699259,0.013978589],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786401,0.004809708,0.0010945274,0.0020834042,0.00769331,0.0056789154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966301,0.02096445,0.0014877284,0.00050358824,0.007577212,0.0031660437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011578629,0.00061520125,0.001247157,0.0015306168,0.029773798,0.010842606,0.0080062505,0.040319048,0.00241109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04198053,0.00079625176,0.0014010259,0.0028118494,0.037123043,0.0041113445,0.0036343737,0.040221244,0.0004030354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051552637,0.000021358042,0.0013758485,0.00041694226,0.000034297635,0.0022151717,0.03908524,0.00041945727,0.00025116233,0.2818212,0.6567558,0.017551972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064319116,0.00002790304,0.0040083705,0.0026676229,0.00011026925,0.00080413657,0.039317057,0.0005860026,0.0003913006,0.044757348,0.9069586,0.00030709058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9772734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98565334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14491588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14491588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24655297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409910909","doi":"10.1017/cls.2024.20","title":"Reducing the “Justice Gap” Through Data for Systemic Change: Using Multiple-Perspective Legal-Needs Surveys to Improve Person-Centered Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1725078629693141,"score_gpt":0.39133556413300946,"score_spread":0.21882770116369535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409910909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88543576,0.00075241,0.050710727,0.014564547,0.00020560603,0.011102049,0.0077049676,0.0004269664,0.029096913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90388656,0.0005316693,0.076145254,0.0019831827,0.000031062533,0.013961009,0.0016555518,0.00006423772,0.0017414669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9467472,0.039599214,0.0029354906,0.001696821,0.0059699514,0.0030514146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89301604,0.041199736,0.011068682,0.011694381,0.036662485,0.006358707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06642434,0.0006357333,0.0008026399,0.0073943646,0.0077468595,0.005421909,0.002631545,0.00084659347,0.003471174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10253322,0.0007534767,0.0007707385,0.009711682,0.0024037356,0.0054818243,0.010068686,0.002101513,0.00054368103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021198795,0.0013740088,0.43834522,0.0016801812,0.00031884678,0.0003823254,0.20951134,0.0016911133,0.0017326266,0.00979119,0.024022793,0.31093842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001599238,0.00090135896,0.5111541,0.0032835053,0.00016440988,0.0001217372,0.3915761,0.00813977,0.0032532476,0.0170032,0.064019665,0.00022301519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43005395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.674083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43005395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021342378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07785196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8551015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409996467","doi":"10.70564/jcals.v1i2.42","title":"TWIRL IN RECOGNITION OF THE RIGHT TO ACCESS LEGAL INFORMATION REGIME IN TANZANIA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Contemporary African Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Computer science; Business; Geography; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.10154376960033157,"score_gpt":0.39491228891895763,"score_spread":0.29336851931862606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409996467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.747118,0.002968974,0.0012300042,0.05283405,0.000303028,0.00015354664,0.000059905407,0.000039746013,0.1952928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97559196,0.00046125133,0.0004969305,0.004438697,0.000032346714,0.000044823555,0.000013281851,0.000007114703,0.01891353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984086,0.00043316386,0.00006888785,0.0001093371,0.0002611718,0.0007188595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982963,0.0006617366,0.00038678697,0.00007458078,0.00017047451,0.00041018645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002396512,0.000103629754,0.00012700973,0.00061821856,0.004802183,0.003178151,0.0004889293,0.0013694924,0.0062163235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040864605,0.00019990308,0.00010099521,0.000582461,0.0034520815,0.0017202654,0.003985146,0.002491386,0.00037536415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009777393,0.00014614585,0.031029288,0.00031046083,0.00000969,0.0087358095,0.2346687,0.00016090952,0.0062120063,0.6300407,0.024260255,0.06432822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091459304,0.00039184725,0.09241299,0.0017147877,0.000053801024,0.004059392,0.21434054,0.0011818677,0.003633827,0.047906995,0.63408536,0.00012715498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021070708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040090397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021070708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003327159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007781983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041896164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410027655","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9559","title":"“Weaponizing” The Tort of Family Violence? Myths, Stereotypes, Lawyers’ Ethics and Access to Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Economic Justice; Mythology; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.14281429637353224,"score_gpt":0.4633369186579882,"score_spread":0.32052262228445594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410027655","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23390731,0.015736077,0.0032042307,0.59947467,0.0007601632,0.000026749325,0.000048254562,0.000023656476,0.14681889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97433215,0.0033825585,0.00038112476,0.018421907,0.00016342029,0.000011400239,0.000008479601,0.000010433788,0.0032885259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99007624,0.0048661805,0.00021482595,0.0006915105,0.002407075,0.0017442864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908598,0.005202878,0.0012092186,0.0004956311,0.0013930988,0.00083936803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011544652,0.00028218335,0.00037793632,0.0017225024,0.022496263,0.013765619,0.00215181,0.006254194,0.0018700528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01767007,0.0003809749,0.00027276506,0.0016590813,0.1322015,0.011317797,0.0039490834,0.009384709,0.00022258057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000121010835,0.00003215715,0.0039163134,0.000049822644,0.0000072563475,0.00018300944,0.33681515,0.00009789421,0.00018499514,0.63472617,0.009134461,0.014840741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015637464,0.000039086073,0.012234163,0.0010628873,0.00002508927,0.00045832622,0.5602268,0.00037519,0.000560453,0.2496313,0.17526966,0.000101406804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5026046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44983575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5026046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034830905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02510751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410027815","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9560","title":"Reflections on the TRC’s Mandate to Law Schools: Microscopic and Macroscopic Changes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Political science; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11036744324900545,"score_gpt":0.4835372393179259,"score_spread":0.3731697960689205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410027815","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021964747,0.010782921,0.0025406578,0.933064,0.014168036,0.00022109949,0.00014097981,0.00013256415,0.016985081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.402063,0.010574008,0.008084104,0.5454175,0.0051802346,0.0006203871,0.00018356525,0.000403475,0.027473614],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.89773756,0.03900397,0.008700734,0.006324301,0.039320093,0.008913434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7684007,0.13502999,0.009100567,0.009649454,0.07030389,0.0075153033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11677225,0.0003955237,0.00076394534,0.0026926973,0.012370914,0.01814918,0.005614837,0.018188467,0.0028615259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.192382,0.0011045297,0.0012971621,0.0034092776,0.0155442385,0.011509966,0.008840538,0.025254982,0.00051679194],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075964716,0.00009987716,0.0035000385,0.0021318928,0.00004085911,0.0025521084,0.11638465,0.0009595951,0.0034932208,0.24516568,0.5364605,0.08913568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014036943,0.000058754613,0.0031783713,0.0013203465,0.000018945311,0.00026588468,0.028929425,0.00022785134,0.0013183202,0.0071516116,0.9573941,0.00012228567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12646891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1278179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12646891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051107384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083077945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61755806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410027959","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9182","title":"Reducing The “Justice Gap” Through Access to Unbundled Legal Services: Utilizing an A2J Measurement Framework to Measure Unbundling Effectiveness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Unbundling; Measure (data warehouse); Economic Justice; Business; Computer science; Telecommunications; Environmental economics; Political science; Database; Industrial organization; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.1968630646339921,"score_gpt":0.44799136096002223,"score_spread":0.2511282963260301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410027959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55519277,0.005985688,0.10048972,0.03659448,0.0007664352,0.006129935,0.007633143,0.00024351486,0.28696436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960411,0.0011266049,0.029047895,0.0022713442,0.000081995975,0.0025541608,0.00086890097,0.00005562175,0.0035825216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92103285,0.031851985,0.0050556124,0.0037302908,0.033273518,0.0050557693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89736074,0.03771801,0.012374155,0.005349544,0.04178957,0.005407869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055282243,0.00068044115,0.00084707286,0.009268381,0.009875728,0.010124728,0.0025859196,0.0015262411,0.0059469067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10546738,0.00034028367,0.0013429685,0.012212244,0.0136258975,0.0075532612,0.00886289,0.0035776363,0.00057021267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021847745,0.00079024426,0.3792464,0.0021402135,0.0005513686,0.0002394498,0.061513867,0.0030810493,0.0010705473,0.30574876,0.020329513,0.22507013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012951034,0.0010564376,0.6663559,0.005316435,0.0007369878,0.00028273097,0.10143013,0.013020487,0.0028540932,0.09750331,0.11084987,0.0004639678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6099742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65916336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6099742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037391048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060044095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78464544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410112869","doi":"10.53300/001c.137770","title":"Dear (Legal) Ed: One Indigenous Scholar’s Reflections on 30 years of Interactions with Legal Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Project commissioning; Legal education; Law; Publishing; Political science; Sociology; Management; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Economics","score_opus":0.0445505031404617,"score_gpt":0.4554306594851408,"score_spread":0.41088015634467906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410112869","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22448877,0.049964916,0.0023887653,0.5846689,0.008213476,0.0001111825,0.00014956488,0.000098991084,0.1299155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7768606,0.022689203,0.0017760464,0.086352624,0.001533929,0.0000818127,0.000047564263,0.00016901153,0.11048916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939978,0.0030886594,0.00009762995,0.0004188691,0.0014564256,0.0009406494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904903,0.0036613066,0.00053566176,0.0002535236,0.0030015095,0.0020576187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006439039,0.00029533223,0.00043312606,0.0011823592,0.030452952,0.008471129,0.0018702114,0.0033531392,0.0040706866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016392604,0.0002237005,0.0003060633,0.0015046914,0.015975995,0.0062648957,0.0045793797,0.009110902,0.00049749605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012641312,0.000024513329,0.0012156771,0.0001365051,0.000009336929,0.0010482126,0.90617335,0.000032746197,0.0002053537,0.022173801,0.052788306,0.016179647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001889294,0.000013934814,0.0010124546,0.0002641672,0.0000091019,0.00047043164,0.67517173,0.000022745538,0.00016372136,0.0009790916,0.32187042,0.000020293064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37063524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6068465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37063524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011146584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023703972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7369558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410360042","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v8i1.81066","title":"Infusing Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) into Academic Integrity Practices in Canadian Higher Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Academic integrity; Higher education; Business; Accounting; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Social science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.09393125411731412,"score_gpt":0.4568473308585299,"score_spread":0.3629160767412158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410360042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5307641,0.004022207,0.0117152715,0.2833991,0.00088530424,0.00030112354,0.00011628995,0.0001888033,0.16860774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98381674,0.00053977943,0.0018770497,0.0065987296,0.0000341285,0.000031844163,0.0000151598915,0.000035365516,0.0070512053],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9044082,0.032141674,0.0029572851,0.004423689,0.031456795,0.024612172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8761297,0.044319168,0.012027611,0.006005541,0.029240925,0.03227698],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052404672,0.00061204017,0.0011372935,0.0037910647,0.11538123,0.025229461,0.0071479273,0.007853277,0.0056210943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08730161,0.0008076771,0.0007699167,0.0066579506,0.08375554,0.010095398,0.03650553,0.015135732,0.00037896307],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004529747,0.00007485768,0.015400413,0.00028717727,0.000019463349,0.0016110975,0.7786701,0.00051123626,0.0007147668,0.14074695,0.01097384,0.05094485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017172119,0.0000918081,0.01692778,0.00085158594,0.00003281918,0.0007893546,0.7448056,0.00085038325,0.0013862221,0.03230644,0.20163131,0.00030952453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9645353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99214673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24970965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42639384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87023044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410362094","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5210174","title":"Abstract for Michele M. Leering's (2023) Integrative Reflective Practice in Canada and Australia: Enhancing Legal Education, Pedagogy, and Professionalism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Pedagogy; Political science; Medical education; Sociology; Nursing; Medicine","score_opus":0.02204004538891354,"score_gpt":0.4384404856262001,"score_spread":0.41640044023728656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410362094","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011653973,0.008809524,0.0013080827,0.8518367,0.11036804,0.00026072064,0.00047610913,0.00035623135,0.025419237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016660517,0.0075748824,0.0050036605,0.27156302,0.020111797,0.00046206726,0.00043970774,0.00031913287,0.6778652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99511874,0.0007360831,0.00028039564,0.00045959017,0.002877806,0.0005273653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97947216,0.0031353296,0.0006555495,0.00062099186,0.007769217,0.008346762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007271113,0.00053417456,0.0005810216,0.0012126028,0.0047620065,0.0061615207,0.0012769124,0.008788321,0.042854913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0184128,0.0003740505,0.00084061216,0.0008796548,0.002097561,0.00273865,0.003448807,0.009611105,0.015213025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013084247,0.000023799217,0.00019489088,0.000069888985,0.0000025084623,0.00004112442,0.00042481392,0.000017782631,0.00012031454,0.0019500883,0.98037124,0.016770404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010073354,0.000024269852,0.0015176319,0.00021556829,0.000004565818,0.00008875951,0.0007454578,0.00008449621,0.0001246655,0.0008743335,0.99629176,0.000018425515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15414767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33153114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8458523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008622829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027544802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3065009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410411999","doi":"10.5430/wjel.v15n7p156","title":"Paving the Way for Legal Academic Writing in Higher Education Institutions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of English Language","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Higher education; Mathematics education; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04844035924415306,"score_gpt":0.41147689880902966,"score_spread":0.3630365395648766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410411999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89443684,0.00085740595,0.007611352,0.025892625,0.00024319152,0.00029131596,0.000022064834,0.00011657157,0.070528634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98458964,0.00038137013,0.007691079,0.0008954288,0.00004912425,0.00006617045,0.0000101383,0.000014050637,0.0063029113],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98804164,0.0084383935,0.0004127788,0.00039246984,0.0015153487,0.001199214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96817726,0.013013643,0.005895362,0.0015541299,0.0038007656,0.0075589335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013253848,0.00019677839,0.00024634463,0.0010957599,0.009409558,0.010701181,0.0016572935,0.0016046842,0.004489704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03898502,0.00029211715,0.00020125118,0.0010168101,0.0059542153,0.005438932,0.006342415,0.0029107942,0.00055700156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078851896,0.0021303783,0.057177696,0.0012761538,0.000012311278,0.0029672233,0.3410159,0.001033295,0.005441915,0.08084823,0.013972736,0.49404538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005061782,0.0007906143,0.0753076,0.0016299945,0.000019333242,0.0014814322,0.65359133,0.0013730284,0.0056110793,0.03117575,0.22887397,0.00009525798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018276019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051227156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013253848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004025884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021536795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07009393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410638566","doi":"10.1163/19585705-12341511","title":"Is There a ‘Jury’ in Islamic Law? The Twelve-Witness Lafīfiyya Testimony and the Limits of Judicial Discretion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Islamica","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Jury; Witness; Law; Discretion; Islam; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.029822195043995046,"score_gpt":0.37097915021650746,"score_spread":0.34115695517251243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410638566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71100897,0.00901023,0.012631468,0.08534778,0.000535246,0.00008949656,0.00011023542,0.00006230844,0.1812043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955917,0.00029652883,0.0006606566,0.001323798,0.00014857901,0.000015882031,0.0000056644403,0.000004530122,0.0019527315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887029,0.005958292,0.0007208935,0.0017859684,0.001374342,0.0014575955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717026,0.019703282,0.0028377518,0.0022723824,0.0021766927,0.0013073727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02930359,0.00017850264,0.0005515863,0.001680444,0.012152504,0.009692357,0.0019854598,0.004539356,0.004032045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04900208,0.00051602285,0.0002449095,0.0009192348,0.026617652,0.0059683095,0.005656563,0.004798254,0.00038032533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014838272,0.000043739205,0.008827145,0.00011462574,0.000023811275,0.0019543427,0.052459028,0.0006412469,0.0011986818,0.8987603,0.0046988847,0.031129785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020151997,0.00032501924,0.0653838,0.0015822592,0.00012460978,0.0016881626,0.092520215,0.0049016317,0.0035352667,0.61988443,0.2094612,0.00039199795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017537192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03053495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02930359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005862581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050897445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1549741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785188","doi":"10.1093/9780199289011.003.0063","title":"Practicalities Of Litigation1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.15677850217980657,"score_gpt":0.3921784893761554,"score_spread":0.23539998719634883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012604597,0.0072734253,0.018553412,0.024315901,0.00047941902,0.00013273489,0.00008255219,0.000118104166,0.9364397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.714111,0.017920192,0.037081126,0.007853279,0.0019485671,0.0003842962,0.00037806883,0.0003117841,0.22001173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.962322,0.016706992,0.0014602036,0.0024959943,0.014314821,0.0026999216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95904386,0.030194083,0.002109005,0.0031766042,0.0042949663,0.0011815788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018287858,0.0005482171,0.00054642773,0.0033819154,0.005567944,0.014215808,0.0029927734,0.0060436535,0.04497515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04358194,0.0005432936,0.0011397445,0.002327046,0.012220582,0.011771174,0.007588017,0.0065746685,0.004959192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014779157,0.000057447494,0.0007862854,0.00018044458,0.000011017334,0.00071248505,0.002188556,0.0023534137,0.0002128228,0.9327132,0.01838014,0.04238935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001938394,0.00010798696,0.0019954331,0.0012941633,0.000015112145,0.0027507853,0.0046221274,0.003639281,0.0006024318,0.5678479,0.41704634,0.00005904429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038691887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00446761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04497515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077704196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066862702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1504569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410918871","doi":"10.1177/14778785251340658","title":"Moral status, epistemic agency, and the education of students labeled with intellectual disability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Moral agency; Epistemology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Moral education; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.057167999361775815,"score_gpt":0.5030226405786556,"score_spread":0.44585464121687984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410918871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94254565,0.0005865576,0.00058174494,0.01717416,0.00006122928,0.000012663966,0.000010382125,0.000007571597,0.039020047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858177,0.00012432836,0.00010798868,0.00035978516,0.000005516261,0.0000060684833,0.0000029810858,0.0000012409723,0.000810381],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939465,0.0032671513,0.00024941715,0.00032675205,0.00093120907,0.0012790633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98588055,0.004944864,0.004216918,0.0006302805,0.00097095454,0.0033563818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006036714,0.00020554417,0.00034844808,0.0013362826,0.008468615,0.0104326885,0.0010972541,0.0026758104,0.003106243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018921895,0.00018381944,0.00029243316,0.00051484443,0.021055145,0.0066981534,0.011784477,0.0058952672,0.00034798667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008648823,0.0008590439,0.11041817,0.000118559525,0.000020251135,0.00074541057,0.6069085,0.00021122504,0.0011985353,0.2271096,0.0027136318,0.04961058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002172372,0.00025265253,0.05943227,0.00069032604,0.000032105698,0.00084914465,0.7535921,0.00058908854,0.0012335327,0.14741682,0.035795394,0.000094899515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005287179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009208217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104326885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030972166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006009087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03192556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411092741","doi":"10.1177/23220058251334748","title":"Student Perspectives of the Value of General Education in Professional Studies: Investigating a Law School in Bangladesh","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Sociology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Law; Political science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.024329567195071018,"score_gpt":0.44467951131055744,"score_spread":0.42034994411548643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411092741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896611,0.00042402337,0.00019423816,0.004014977,0.000030188248,0.000023494224,0.000016937724,0.0000036474087,0.0056314105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960103,0.0007960892,0.00020185685,0.00097005157,0.000015568885,0.00001604616,0.000012456022,0.0000036119238,0.0019740805],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961356,0.0023459233,0.00016615776,0.00019036658,0.00063951086,0.00052257016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98812693,0.0055140834,0.00122529,0.0002581854,0.0014803642,0.0033951784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071444223,0.00022115286,0.00038352096,0.001089277,0.0066860584,0.007644318,0.0006881554,0.0016525642,0.0027664576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00935596,0.00035665362,0.0002045463,0.0013008919,0.0052845585,0.003213526,0.0046855994,0.0029159663,0.0004340465],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003145017,0.00020704743,0.047281362,0.00019344031,0.000007350338,0.0013113196,0.9245696,0.000035672463,0.0015722663,0.0035036686,0.0017963905,0.019490466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043415853,0.000119000746,0.010992098,0.00011868295,0.000006328969,0.00029589454,0.97230136,0.00004286233,0.00026494262,0.0004656722,0.01537274,0.000015975585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032683392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008892394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007644318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029096236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044186846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037783742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411153133","doi":"10.5539/jel.v14n6p119","title":"Critical Perspectives on Ethical Challenges in Higher Education: Analysing Contemporary Practices and Future Considerations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education and Learning","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Political science","score_opus":0.1664070591323326,"score_gpt":0.49573737836728055,"score_spread":0.32933031923494793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411153133","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022902394,0.3476064,0.015223807,0.5555205,0.006884154,0.00011589107,0.00007360649,0.000050313167,0.051622983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5400301,0.34876248,0.014147017,0.08057953,0.008827619,0.00039979187,0.000110152876,0.00015960584,0.0069835978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651667,0.02442212,0.0016256166,0.00200213,0.004843748,0.0019396427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8644764,0.11723592,0.0045943325,0.0020222103,0.009325274,0.0023458651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04711694,0.000890485,0.00100901,0.0063112658,0.00868328,0.021579271,0.002833917,0.009283648,0.0037127235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05814316,0.00052822835,0.0009081162,0.007515886,0.03455324,0.024363473,0.008998942,0.01335266,0.0005290129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039737995,0.000052231073,0.0015770899,0.0032358319,0.00004538486,0.001109896,0.19679816,0.0006357482,0.00030030805,0.65615124,0.028987233,0.11106708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001077218,0.000044124507,0.001286034,0.012967301,0.00002135452,0.0009221797,0.27948558,0.00041996085,0.0002795473,0.21670943,0.48778173,0.00007193171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039772857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007726876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04711694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0151397055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016747545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24918115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411166513","doi":"10.31542/27qd3a63","title":"Teaching, Technology, and Time: Revisiting Ellen Rose’s Call for Reflection in an AI Era","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pedagogical Inquiry and Practice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Rose (mathematics); Deep time; Reflection (computer programming); History; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2513450595105244,"score_gpt":0.5580567274845407,"score_spread":0.30671166797401633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411166513","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014255469,0.041142352,0.030236853,0.79747033,0.010487263,0.00009899371,0.00003308025,0.00013623273,0.10613939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52351505,0.088707365,0.052742727,0.23302624,0.010669544,0.0005164503,0.000075073345,0.00081176695,0.08993587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805698,0.01451981,0.0005649185,0.0011964446,0.0022045749,0.0009444099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9470947,0.047430612,0.00091436924,0.001197733,0.0023625668,0.0009999988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017667761,0.0007956321,0.00079678843,0.0021501377,0.006970479,0.016095752,0.0035564022,0.008788562,0.002488101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026317546,0.00055144983,0.0008505839,0.0020608972,0.04402445,0.026373936,0.008586204,0.017087206,0.0009333702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026912005,0.00005200551,0.00031419154,0.00037412983,0.000010063313,0.0006203374,0.14938374,0.0003773435,0.00032552396,0.7561219,0.059786085,0.03260779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013940492,0.000046960005,0.00032488036,0.0013504705,0.000010561583,0.00047970173,0.05981599,0.0005662797,0.0004751317,0.17987971,0.75698423,0.000052102176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011360862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017241105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017667761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007980185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008823824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093437135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411174973","doi":"10.17323/1999-5431-2015-0-1-7-32","title":"Ethics and responsibility in the public administration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Issues","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Public administration; Business; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.24286063217806558,"score_gpt":0.4911773963812261,"score_spread":0.2483167642031605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411174973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015503185,0.060117807,0.037936624,0.27816072,0.0037420574,0.000076156975,0.000027717342,0.000085434476,0.6043504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8997948,0.021062218,0.007257271,0.022255376,0.005539545,0.00018031188,0.000020645028,0.00008186553,0.043807946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799707,0.014992355,0.0004937456,0.0008334596,0.0024672889,0.0012425543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877351,0.009162482,0.00087369327,0.00067129085,0.0007961656,0.0007611961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011230514,0.00048654032,0.0005070079,0.0014123875,0.0063679977,0.012302049,0.0010260894,0.00558118,0.002227016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008236332,0.00027618872,0.00051462586,0.0013265307,0.06859805,0.0075190384,0.0046607032,0.007865108,0.00061779533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001338331,0.000005149218,0.000067839035,0.000019891224,0.0000014185342,0.000024954872,0.0024370982,0.000083386076,0.000011332273,0.99297404,0.0021052002,0.002268325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004843061,0.000016545184,0.00029153615,0.0002341708,0.0000027636702,0.00008604194,0.003066352,0.00024708282,0.00005642709,0.8319383,0.16404623,0.000009677419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042004124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028310984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012302049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00956626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012052542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06940842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411204616","doi":"10.59057/iberoleon.20075316.20093773","title":"The University and the Construction of a New Ethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Entretextos (en línea, León, Gto.)/Entretextos","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.030255055526372795,"score_gpt":0.3435738087806242,"score_spread":0.3133187532542514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411204616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058857925,0.009839622,0.066512145,0.31988248,0.0026563013,0.00012390863,0.000023742994,0.00013409324,0.5419698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9556569,0.001847645,0.014647968,0.008688165,0.0007473791,0.00016772201,0.000012823167,0.000057437777,0.018174075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9642006,0.029568475,0.0007312177,0.0013697518,0.0026990308,0.0014308236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828063,0.010301646,0.001324874,0.0020014562,0.0015990941,0.0019666378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024008695,0.00044977464,0.0006557363,0.0019991486,0.011957007,0.015445857,0.0011395888,0.00700629,0.0022223208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017368494,0.00034736734,0.00049365696,0.0011066962,0.117818326,0.015352232,0.009629854,0.008665952,0.0004493403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023011278,0.000007689769,0.00006299399,0.000009872974,0.0000013678334,0.000026079408,0.004353148,0.00008392244,0.000027756225,0.99249977,0.0008251205,0.0021000039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007889194,0.000015106562,0.00009205647,0.00008138992,0.000002054217,0.000067314315,0.005661475,0.0002875455,0.00008484045,0.9169891,0.076698735,0.000012496341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017696907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014186138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024008695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00728589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013105801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1269716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411268843","doi":"10.22318/icls2025.322165","title":"Qualitative Research in the Age of LLMs: A Human-in-the-Loop Approach to Hybrid Thematic Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings.","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Thematic map; Thematic analysis; Computer science; Loop (graph theory); Qualitative research; Sociology; Geography; Social science; Mathematics; Cartography","score_opus":0.3566284833994176,"score_gpt":0.595074222641302,"score_spread":0.23844573924188445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411268843","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018063076,0.0007916904,0.95202625,0.011281329,0.0002094734,0.0036296404,0.00024659318,0.00028307174,0.013468906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24730034,0.0005268365,0.73867625,0.0016672403,0.0000769963,0.0089987535,0.00020195967,0.0001861418,0.002365351],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.72206366,0.26008514,0.0039083054,0.0059848037,0.006444876,0.0015131942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6477142,0.31281367,0.007847662,0.017163845,0.011927581,0.0025331054],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21602713,0.0012958384,0.001340699,0.007863664,0.008347943,0.013738269,0.0050061354,0.002827638,0.0052575194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18691732,0.00134477,0.0014646427,0.004861824,0.035744596,0.015365464,0.013654863,0.0051493826,0.00087489403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111320085,0.00012998958,0.0019824638,0.0017880704,0.00008256016,0.00032273185,0.48890942,0.0026224921,0.001665424,0.4293378,0.002751461,0.070296146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014462872,0.00014650378,0.00078820786,0.0029945243,0.00006243041,0.00029845128,0.17206892,0.013178292,0.0028189763,0.71566457,0.091724455,0.00011014332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046812915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071378504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78397286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013852584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02008804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9667781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411288310","doi":"10.1177/09646639251349395","title":"Legal Counsel, Moral Expectations, and Youth with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Economies of Worth in Youth Courts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Moral economy; Intellectual disability; Political science; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.0623797416919309,"score_gpt":0.35921744809790873,"score_spread":0.29683770640597784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411288310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8802401,0.0017109523,0.0005485573,0.02780902,0.000087576605,0.0000329681,0.000020416002,0.000014453344,0.089535944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997926,0.0001855256,0.000058319736,0.00074585894,0.00001041658,0.0000073800466,0.0000031398656,0.0000038576136,0.0010594002],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98945075,0.006180019,0.00024246918,0.00044458892,0.0014174003,0.0022647097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915588,0.0033155202,0.0015561954,0.00016511176,0.0009915897,0.002412808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006810063,0.00020049654,0.00045600982,0.0017636075,0.022260282,0.016750325,0.0015367928,0.002989291,0.0024753427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016294122,0.00032319914,0.0002482455,0.0013247543,0.033935696,0.005724384,0.010976342,0.0066416794,0.00017254785],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016319673,0.000109933164,0.013696528,0.000023583176,0.00000489082,0.0008577994,0.8503635,0.000060932663,0.00008713107,0.12628643,0.0024573281,0.0060356925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008731412,0.000015462138,0.0076186075,0.00011543157,0.000005643168,0.00023829775,0.95860934,0.00011197982,0.00007354749,0.017613612,0.015573412,0.000016031614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08160202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123414546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08160202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016514052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017509624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1622541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411547918","doi":"10.1017/9781009578103.011","title":"Translations of Consulting Surgeons’ Manuals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04748433220154639,"score_gpt":0.416909653107814,"score_spread":0.3694253209062676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411547918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019131843,0.0009055123,0.0033905518,0.009705381,0.008056517,0.0003051667,0.06394178,0.0020093846,0.90977246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040757232,0.00065971387,0.0035838296,0.0015826393,0.00073761813,0.00036351616,0.023331685,0.0016978749,0.9639674],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960294,0.0006399935,0.0004187998,0.0002371158,0.0023350948,0.00033966306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822275,0.0067327796,0.0006411945,0.0013259917,0.008298557,0.00077395764],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028477965,0.0010381982,0.00057102035,0.0063081267,0.0018459652,0.0034990797,0.0015924431,0.0018379303,0.48966622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023965994,0.0006521008,0.0005495439,0.0075650704,0.00095562683,0.0017333283,0.0013887818,0.0026419533,0.3447788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026687656,0.000016234899,0.00007196801,0.00008887439,0.0000012868394,0.000029703711,0.00011831631,0.000052453397,0.00008046879,0.00606614,0.97044647,0.023001466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022544107,0.0000061461824,0.0010470111,0.000078647434,0.0000014003102,0.000052954692,0.00013937899,0.000094443276,0.0001223961,0.00202602,0.99639904,0.000010035305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03219992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060864963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48966622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035140305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00703676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7279292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411585669","doi":"10.29173/alr2834","title":"Legal Ethics for Crown Attorneys on Appeal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Appeal; Crown (dentistry); Law; Legal ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Materials science","score_opus":0.11534644182191173,"score_gpt":0.4826892250749588,"score_spread":0.3673427832530471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411585669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053673673,0.031452447,0.01784199,0.29768717,0.0018974174,0.0002425789,0.0000621526,0.00010193273,0.5970407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8917648,0.008102284,0.005832879,0.041850444,0.0020566077,0.00023869866,0.000040167888,0.00007278884,0.050041255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.926574,0.03540916,0.0033620682,0.0035760303,0.020999715,0.010079069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93935865,0.040343802,0.0036380047,0.0033343113,0.009182339,0.004142816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041739948,0.00036284231,0.00082871574,0.002360169,0.0102503095,0.015750373,0.002412213,0.023052376,0.004135969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12707567,0.0007509796,0.00072919053,0.0017485805,0.02648875,0.0060426397,0.005758717,0.013396303,0.001278221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007153686,0.000026526648,0.0007623045,0.000043999866,0.00000892735,0.00023326173,0.0026232637,0.00026926905,0.000099579775,0.97616315,0.011344696,0.008417789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041562995,0.00004314233,0.0027950765,0.0008022545,0.000027747747,0.00040977806,0.0037313597,0.0012734339,0.00026785268,0.812026,0.17851946,0.0000624044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038826626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039033428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041739948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0143108815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0486135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22074461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411599541","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-062124-121908","title":"Law, Empires, Legal Professions, and Status Hierarchies: Comparative Perspectives","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal status; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Law; Legal pluralism; Legal profession; Law and economics; Legal realism; Sociology","score_opus":0.04568850723392285,"score_gpt":0.4741606614625519,"score_spread":0.42847215422862905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411599541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1563688,0.15196426,0.0016201753,0.027328314,0.00033542555,0.000017918226,0.000064545275,0.000011273412,0.6622892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9428485,0.04881727,0.00051284244,0.0009768602,0.00033280905,0.000024342571,0.000035397166,0.000013025192,0.0064389235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975164,0.0016243508,0.000051567582,0.00011613511,0.00036302142,0.00032851848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99531096,0.0035507435,0.0003542906,0.00009536875,0.00031980028,0.00036885834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030411077,0.00027715837,0.0003706434,0.008304736,0.0062886677,0.007994682,0.0005427033,0.0014647914,0.005969489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004014665,0.00019144863,0.00013703702,0.008411132,0.027461749,0.0073618074,0.0041565713,0.0016654934,0.00026558532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015816155,0.000035603323,0.0036213212,0.00019588816,0.000008067316,0.00024910242,0.07139151,0.00009888681,0.0000751329,0.8942444,0.0021497617,0.027914556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021014821,0.00007973737,0.032701116,0.0019722714,0.000022055587,0.0005914677,0.3432521,0.00036383083,0.00013230438,0.21571216,0.4051278,0.000024096047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019273184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05040528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019273184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007215828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003279599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052354753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656580","doi":"10.51847/vycir2i8i2","title":"10.51847/VyCir2i8i2","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Economic Justice; Medical education; Psychology; Political science; Law; Medicine; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.020467766740397537,"score_gpt":0.2973973772784542,"score_spread":0.2769296105380567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01716956,0.0010954693,0.0015208195,0.0017558362,0.0006009419,0.00014223332,0.0013829238,0.0010069489,0.97532517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037787173,0.0007044344,0.002443174,0.00067526806,0.00018765157,0.00015881025,0.0018273415,0.00025752658,0.95595866],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990213,0.0001819822,0.00009197675,0.00024274326,0.0002405239,0.0002215229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998245,0.00045766807,0.00012495136,0.00016927102,0.00058422086,0.00041897775],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011286465,0.00071847026,0.00056456146,0.0018858586,0.0013831188,0.003937999,0.00062745623,0.0020449269,0.86519974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001519726,0.0002637863,0.0003903018,0.0019867413,0.000703209,0.0017396335,0.0016356714,0.0010782044,0.8111541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043963408,0.0007221838,0.017050944,0.00058473286,0.000024440693,0.00057124917,0.0007307322,0.00029744362,0.0035331133,0.0066102142,0.17565367,0.7937817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014610811,0.0002892778,0.024359457,0.0005325242,0.000034022265,0.0014425478,0.002174306,0.0012857397,0.0014994194,0.0016980297,0.9664787,0.000059838512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007608828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056285355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13480026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010713587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011717912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19227624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656850","doi":"10.51847/zi1xtabnoy","title":"10.51847/zi1xtabnoy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0200240355321701,"score_gpt":0.29624650147355913,"score_spread":0.27622246594138905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018338881,0.0023411002,0.0024041662,0.0029236374,0.0009911295,0.000064442356,0.00093400164,0.000895774,0.98761183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007749339,0.0015978853,0.0015508658,0.00068566453,0.0001378671,0.00006737058,0.00060746307,0.0003195205,0.98728406],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999551,0.00006660565,0.00004494111,0.00012306556,0.00015547778,0.00005893043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933213,0.00018758394,0.00006225863,0.0001056909,0.00019448061,0.0001177521],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068073336,0.0011076232,0.00082304765,0.0021399497,0.0017093924,0.0049586017,0.0010340307,0.002458628,0.90908724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016623876,0.00043423419,0.00039891692,0.002210894,0.0013519364,0.003730125,0.0029319786,0.0019010233,0.8887069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024115156,0.00015187004,0.001380883,0.0006367558,0.000018548782,0.00027118868,0.0004911324,0.00030043826,0.0018739414,0.053336985,0.29651687,0.6447803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020177398,0.000021115142,0.00095710193,0.00018709128,0.0000088018905,0.00018633327,0.00021943911,0.0002573919,0.0002675967,0.005115052,0.99274606,0.000013914579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037888344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035659622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09091276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001721699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007092698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12967604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411899333","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v32i2.1690","title":"Collective advocacy in the age of neoliberalism: Getting political in an interdisciplinary law clinic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Politics; Legal education; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.08426662778730143,"score_gpt":0.5668848604204777,"score_spread":0.48261823263317627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411899333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8811197,0.00069712696,0.003318463,0.06907299,0.00093715696,0.00017963596,0.00001724644,0.00007767819,0.04458002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881301,0.00027326966,0.0011107095,0.0047392277,0.00013194725,0.00006937255,0.000006690578,0.000029245382,0.0055094413],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866953,0.009129895,0.00015300665,0.00060459785,0.0008506278,0.0025665723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98254126,0.004658823,0.0012716427,0.00055065856,0.000547078,0.010430567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013201716,0.00043833547,0.00042438225,0.00094846176,0.03316876,0.01298559,0.0029227564,0.0045563104,0.012024995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012159765,0.000626492,0.00046349276,0.0006474624,0.028372733,0.0082328655,0.022956926,0.011753614,0.0009039798],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000631979,0.0014887839,0.011718419,0.00017040795,0.000010816711,0.00465867,0.9091581,0.0001431582,0.000886282,0.027156575,0.0117446445,0.032801032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027709239,0.00021552549,0.0032013431,0.00023393579,0.000005380848,0.0018147951,0.9354671,0.00022151403,0.00032540836,0.007866409,0.050593156,0.000027650767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023191376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008840838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03316876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059906906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013633148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0698182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412230150","doi":"","title":"Theorizing the empirical turn in legal scholarship","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Turn (biochemistry); Political science; Sociology; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.3552337382506771,"score_gpt":0.458512381306195,"score_spread":0.10327864305551787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412230150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035818458,0.03709871,0.2059035,0.26651746,0.002202861,0.0002305518,0.00019955373,0.00020505859,0.45182392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8927754,0.020715179,0.049714673,0.018017286,0.0029242728,0.00060840335,0.00029270124,0.00033016436,0.014621942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96971625,0.02234913,0.0007877765,0.002308696,0.0037798234,0.0010582273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9266912,0.06103252,0.0026567013,0.0044444464,0.0039680013,0.0012071774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035637207,0.0011762724,0.00099697,0.010301118,0.0066529824,0.019244488,0.0036158466,0.006599384,0.009222528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050567266,0.0009322562,0.00106085,0.005837586,0.10116452,0.044209197,0.01168201,0.013223476,0.0011919616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025194772,0.000013566859,0.00027298534,0.00004506916,0.0000031927518,0.00002067204,0.003052353,0.00010876142,0.00002293493,0.99462575,0.00039801758,0.0014342591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009036902,0.000006671526,0.00021281284,0.00031005245,0.0000049131145,0.000029038243,0.003572692,0.00042971259,0.00005075253,0.98102194,0.014346604,0.0000058282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004069179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036058258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035637207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014072119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010143086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18846989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412267669","doi":"","title":"Book Review - Michael Legg, Prue Vines, and Janet Chan: The Impact of Technology and Innovation on the Wellbeing of the Legal Profession","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Management; Art history; Media studies; Art; Economics","score_opus":0.04847323051758125,"score_gpt":0.3719142173604834,"score_spread":0.3234409868429022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412267669","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000119500626,0.65938663,0.00024691306,0.20863116,0.100132585,0.00008639446,0.00040023596,0.00005415179,0.030942414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018354768,0.63961124,0.00043629526,0.14592928,0.061983988,0.00014564542,0.000528612,0.0001083824,0.1494211],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981275,0.00035449275,0.00011137782,0.00018098002,0.0011106292,0.000114974064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902104,0.005166807,0.0005131372,0.00017044123,0.0033000256,0.0006392202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018899172,0.0010964188,0.0017975054,0.004447438,0.0011035389,0.0042357952,0.0024378074,0.0076980507,0.040065367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013952956,0.0006106179,0.0008464527,0.0061471546,0.0017943317,0.0037750008,0.001955106,0.0051989355,0.022636943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040150317,0.0000051467764,0.000019017802,0.00034160592,0.0000058194055,0.000018276287,0.00001865427,0.000015108128,0.000011737375,0.0007118653,0.9850161,0.013832614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001209475,0.000009509561,0.00020506098,0.0014271147,0.000013530475,0.00013354457,0.000043441287,0.000014409876,0.000020887474,0.0009265592,0.9971855,0.000008363044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018885849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060052447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040065367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004838962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006704797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13403207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412273463","doi":"","title":"Cultural, critical, global: criminology and criminal justice at the University","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal justice; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.28383589765423234,"score_gpt":0.4377890822549886,"score_spread":0.15395318460075624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412273463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3508612,0.039010428,0.0031042418,0.22926712,0.002186708,0.00007128975,0.00009957436,0.000074696625,0.37532473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98953056,0.0025324512,0.00026432986,0.0019617802,0.00014477274,0.000011704677,0.000009498498,0.000027208323,0.005517749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872551,0.008653887,0.00029733384,0.00059888803,0.0014504367,0.0017444658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98912317,0.004143176,0.0008826885,0.00041453855,0.0010796336,0.0043568863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075196936,0.0005819299,0.00047767512,0.0032109532,0.016285174,0.02610291,0.0014230595,0.0038690658,0.010579947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013157096,0.00048190073,0.00027976572,0.0031071142,0.048920237,0.009193138,0.009802265,0.007264528,0.0004596482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082485996,0.00024977373,0.014126982,0.00039215537,0.00006818038,0.0005121738,0.32118452,0.0004921424,0.00046755126,0.60426724,0.017496835,0.040660035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024816905,0.00008560563,0.04105094,0.0015971746,0.00009462333,0.00053678104,0.5465464,0.00037025302,0.000913604,0.15025303,0.25841215,0.00011466808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050932385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08636345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050932385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018461024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032120034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13394475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412528240","doi":"10.4324/9781003640028","title":"The Ethics of Argumentation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08863514892538454,"score_gpt":0.47653559245116367,"score_spread":0.3879004435257791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412528240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038929575,0.038697094,0.0986001,0.080596656,0.0028672335,0.00015669927,0.00017249187,0.00025427624,0.7747626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.585564,0.04486058,0.10238588,0.025061436,0.007310191,0.0012742167,0.00040263377,0.0005590072,0.232582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.973403,0.015803995,0.0013756994,0.001964115,0.0061689066,0.001284112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98612714,0.009407205,0.00094557833,0.0016795979,0.0012633185,0.0005770755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010569437,0.0009843634,0.0011630158,0.0021003424,0.005902291,0.017449718,0.0020942688,0.00866471,0.006302862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016698267,0.00084334635,0.001079538,0.0017771231,0.03831641,0.0150983175,0.006561231,0.008236768,0.0032732703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023590962,0.0000019111321,0.000030112198,0.00003357052,0.0000035524904,0.000021779375,0.0007138547,0.00009757152,0.000021360058,0.992121,0.003288569,0.0036643695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050612507,0.0000046673135,0.000050062004,0.00019064099,0.0000031237118,0.0000815879,0.00038330432,0.00025776215,0.000042351596,0.8101154,0.18885928,0.0000067663814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018399539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013443078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017449718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006159521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059281546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055897176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412673258","doi":"10.1145/3731120.3744588","title":"Principles and Guidelines for the Use of LLM Judges","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Universitas Brawijaya; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.511676247310532,"score_gpt":0.5246279955725135,"score_spread":0.012951748261981533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412673258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035137224,0.008626978,0.26498032,0.12449183,0.010740273,0.015779207,0.0055752755,0.0035769492,0.5627155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042055845,0.008832633,0.56914437,0.028404087,0.0030728602,0.04065188,0.0043691318,0.0023185888,0.3011506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8150052,0.09950145,0.022448214,0.0056637637,0.05099598,0.006385302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7355461,0.14602609,0.009057924,0.03248332,0.0714645,0.005422007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12596609,0.0014913561,0.0020956185,0.009557955,0.009523786,0.021658866,0.010173945,0.02393229,0.04623748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28446525,0.0037955826,0.0024284928,0.010771365,0.01633805,0.011038337,0.00845275,0.023592109,0.053856023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008511187,0.0002221425,0.00044213628,0.0009003951,0.000019405225,0.0002174154,0.00810927,0.0004628633,0.0006269352,0.4039956,0.51101893,0.073899776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008431015,0.00008808352,0.001177393,0.0037271238,0.00002879186,0.00047720375,0.00288728,0.0011079147,0.00076384644,0.11543344,0.87410235,0.00012221678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013444001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02827931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12596609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077781444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044623468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6661803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412800233","doi":"10.36253/sijis-2239-3978-16602","title":"Fiction as Fact and Legend as History: The Significance of the Irish-Canadian Novel The Yellow Briar and Its Author John Mitchell to the History of the Ontario Legal Profession","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studi irlandesi A Journal of Irish Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Legend; Law; Art history; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08402276436281633,"score_gpt":0.369267673520756,"score_spread":0.28524490915793965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412800233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058928818,0.016988408,0.0010518545,0.08056823,0.0054423846,0.000054799868,0.0003131371,0.00008201806,0.8365704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77252734,0.009042358,0.0008359805,0.006162923,0.0012235857,0.00003581286,0.00013439632,0.00016022453,0.20987742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769056,0.00057931826,0.000036958118,0.00022616524,0.00076582254,0.00070119975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971835,0.00082626485,0.0002134899,0.00016381832,0.0009805355,0.0006323277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022238523,0.0005624083,0.00046337018,0.0020016609,0.032794733,0.017214026,0.0017321042,0.0023133976,0.0085679125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005800758,0.00030926545,0.00025792402,0.0028028763,0.045784418,0.0039472566,0.0036994396,0.0045119296,0.0008385513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008963291,0.000033078544,0.0011558597,0.00015881972,0.000011885381,0.0009963221,0.30475467,0.0002606933,0.00036725317,0.5079211,0.1649303,0.019320404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062696727,0.000008148469,0.0014141416,0.00019396645,0.0000073149968,0.00016958195,0.07346811,0.000073658724,0.00014962674,0.005344896,0.9191331,0.00003113563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9261937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9714706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10591118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10591118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065064214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.768443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412993961","doi":"10.1515/eplj-2025-0006","title":"Editorial – Young Property Lawyers’ Forum Issue","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Property Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Engineering ethics; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02588125146948527,"score_gpt":0.3310650191178583,"score_spread":0.305183767648373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412993961","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013388823,0.0013382077,0.00007646873,0.05875297,0.93713987,0.000050894872,0.000056776626,0.000055312816,0.0023955794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013622773,0.0011122052,0.00010204275,0.047128387,0.9307116,0.00007335354,0.000048692807,0.00004585836,0.019415563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455774,0.00073685194,0.0006418025,0.0008320029,0.0024162794,0.00081541506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707097,0.013004453,0.0019185365,0.0010250658,0.007997897,0.0053444225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009371889,0.0029860768,0.0029022691,0.0054330775,0.0061011873,0.0100966375,0.0034450088,0.035320714,0.040768445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036386605,0.0013030618,0.003787785,0.0016954732,0.003282476,0.0044502467,0.003016059,0.01714012,0.017191164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055463417,0.000030791653,0.000062531064,0.00010066707,0.00001192689,0.00015823792,0.000023080804,0.000015342379,0.000067959016,0.00027571904,0.99565,0.0035483455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014541381,0.000049934733,0.0009625686,0.00036551658,0.000044561744,0.00020042244,0.00011714475,0.00013433005,0.00013942522,0.0011866174,0.9966317,0.000022299228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020107927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049610985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040768445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004154237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004893442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13638401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413105546","doi":"10.32920/29896193.v1","title":"Don’t Dabble in Family Law: A Lesson in Negligence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Family law; Political science","score_opus":0.09511145722735594,"score_gpt":0.4549234589094668,"score_spread":0.35981200168211086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413105546","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016915323,0.020343497,0.00026480918,0.9631883,0.0054591387,0.0000053846497,0.0000063512966,0.000017882012,0.009023046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09952428,0.03501163,0.0010409692,0.828333,0.010878547,0.000058205515,0.000021070147,0.0000793607,0.025052825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603146,0.0017393812,0.0001456016,0.00035616566,0.0009948736,0.0007324965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98853904,0.006796772,0.000318901,0.0003209109,0.0012480812,0.0027762954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007036303,0.0003469186,0.000659625,0.00086145377,0.014292081,0.005362088,0.0018638063,0.01733983,0.0057293824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01692932,0.00053736777,0.0005455587,0.00039693806,0.02182313,0.012344178,0.003974636,0.030568112,0.0011426394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017970337,0.00009469256,0.0014873927,0.00016247867,0.000011644856,0.0010429915,0.021849925,0.00005181025,0.00011747168,0.050015174,0.8636736,0.061474778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048487567,0.000111425565,0.0039901333,0.002684025,0.000022633441,0.001792644,0.034865767,0.00017596247,0.00017330928,0.07916861,0.87690544,0.00006164723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06661541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16854917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06661541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081915045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016457891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13245529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413161480","doi":"10.1177/09646639251366476","title":"Challenges Faced by Lawyers Representing Chinese Immigrants in Canada: Understanding Lawyer-Client Relationships Through Legal Consciousness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legal consciousness; Immigration; Consciousness; Law; Sociology; Legal profession; Legal service; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.1784854877967362,"score_gpt":0.4221680977939292,"score_spread":0.24368260999719302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413161480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841994,0.00056683365,0.0001868111,0.007746751,0.00002730433,0.000025765887,0.000017569182,0.0000070043047,0.0072225393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962417,0.0005064545,0.0001640078,0.0013516509,0.0000088295565,0.00001558131,0.000013482636,0.000005764305,0.0016925312],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936335,0.0021657727,0.00014497706,0.00037999623,0.0010839708,0.0025917594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99157715,0.0025479347,0.0012794598,0.00015330684,0.001559112,0.002883047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052489154,0.0004092876,0.0006451747,0.0018219409,0.04548367,0.009963019,0.0023219825,0.002329454,0.0040821605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011055361,0.00050763076,0.0002759968,0.0030883334,0.019721437,0.003024522,0.0099476315,0.0040373798,0.00026247895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001387751,0.000024567493,0.014007185,0.000029637105,0.000005584714,0.0007446637,0.97849166,0.000020383082,0.0002885446,0.0014701951,0.0007855355,0.004118155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012912847,0.00000545563,0.003736852,0.000026144153,0.0000029138066,0.00006475351,0.9940058,0.000025736445,0.000033598615,0.00015687241,0.001933182,0.0000073055094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87776655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9498709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12223345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06218316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10458386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45117247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186294","doi":"10.32920/29896193","title":"Don’t Dabble in Family Law: A Lesson in Negligence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.09511145722735594,"score_gpt":0.4549234589094668,"score_spread":0.35981200168211086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186294","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016915323,0.020343497,0.00026480918,0.9631883,0.0054591387,0.0000053846497,0.0000063512966,0.000017882012,0.009023046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09952428,0.03501163,0.0010409692,0.828333,0.010878547,0.000058205515,0.000021070147,0.0000793607,0.025052825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603146,0.0017393812,0.0001456016,0.00035616566,0.0009948736,0.0007324965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98853904,0.006796772,0.000318901,0.0003209109,0.0012480812,0.0027762954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007036303,0.0003469186,0.000659625,0.00086145377,0.014292081,0.005362088,0.0018638063,0.01733983,0.0057293824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01692932,0.00053736777,0.0005455587,0.00039693806,0.02182313,0.012344178,0.003974636,0.030568112,0.0011426394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017970337,0.00009469256,0.0014873927,0.00016247867,0.000011644856,0.0010429915,0.021849925,0.00005181025,0.00011747168,0.050015174,0.8636736,0.061474778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048487567,0.000111425565,0.0039901333,0.002684025,0.000022633441,0.001792644,0.034865767,0.00017596247,0.00017330928,0.07916861,0.87690544,0.00006164723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06661541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16854917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06661541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081915045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016457891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13245529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186322","doi":"10.32920/29896196.v1","title":"Should There Be a Different Code of Conduct for Family Lawyers?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Code of conduct; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Programming language; Sociology","score_opus":0.3648351628268591,"score_gpt":0.5030932860361922,"score_spread":0.13825812320933306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186322","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025258893,0.002472794,0.0042967973,0.881072,0.0084746685,0.00017987615,0.0002681625,0.00029096744,0.10041891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11339668,0.0037750741,0.015573475,0.6775147,0.0028583042,0.00053348666,0.00054709346,0.00083144044,0.18496987],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9518293,0.015645938,0.0024393692,0.0031406498,0.015635362,0.01130923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88951117,0.01931286,0.0037604813,0.009472598,0.048499204,0.02944362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03167129,0.00047317412,0.0008285333,0.0019749487,0.022176478,0.017085198,0.0039795944,0.018824385,0.031380285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11830906,0.0010677518,0.0012305751,0.0017383994,0.017575039,0.013995748,0.0049755913,0.02029781,0.014954866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037182002,0.000060844028,0.0015492591,0.000125272,0.000008767872,0.0002229104,0.007088812,0.000055268247,0.00035034132,0.14608143,0.79797876,0.04644114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002855626,0.00002114368,0.0020370004,0.00064710673,0.0000090521735,0.00024297023,0.008714107,0.00008483006,0.0002694899,0.01619481,0.9716647,0.000086199805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37841976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46064144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37841976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033388086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10790145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75243425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186385","doi":"10.32920/29896196","title":"Should There Be a Different Code of Conduct for Family Lawyers?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Code of conduct; Business; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Programming language; Sociology","score_opus":0.3648351628268591,"score_gpt":0.5030932860361922,"score_spread":0.13825812320933306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186385","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025258893,0.002472794,0.0042967973,0.881072,0.0084746685,0.00017987615,0.0002681625,0.00029096744,0.10041891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11339668,0.0037750741,0.015573475,0.6775147,0.0028583042,0.00053348666,0.00054709346,0.00083144044,0.18496987],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9518293,0.015645938,0.0024393692,0.0031406498,0.015635362,0.01130923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88951117,0.01931286,0.0037604813,0.009472598,0.048499204,0.02944362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03167129,0.00047317412,0.0008285333,0.0019749487,0.022176478,0.017085198,0.0039795944,0.018824385,0.031380285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11830906,0.0010677518,0.0012305751,0.0017383994,0.017575039,0.013995748,0.0049755913,0.02029781,0.014954866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037182002,0.000060844028,0.0015492591,0.000125272,0.000008767872,0.0002229104,0.007088812,0.000055268247,0.00035034132,0.14608143,0.79797876,0.04644114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002855626,0.00002114368,0.0020370004,0.00064710673,0.0000090521735,0.00024297023,0.008714107,0.00008483006,0.0002694899,0.01619481,0.9716647,0.000086199805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37841976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46064144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37841976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033388086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10790145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75243425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186528","doi":"10.32920/29896172.v1","title":"Looking at Legal Ethics Through the Lens of Family Violence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lens (geology); Through-the-lens metering; Legal ethics; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law; Optics; Physics","score_opus":0.1696826318832342,"score_gpt":0.46751166106648395,"score_spread":0.2978290291832497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03356201,0.025240926,0.014578404,0.4604512,0.0014179385,0.000042353262,0.000071013645,0.00003420073,0.46460196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9246283,0.012526736,0.004229487,0.030567093,0.0013974303,0.00009064969,0.000032417254,0.00006487307,0.026463002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98700315,0.010409896,0.00014238755,0.0004182469,0.0010340428,0.0009923106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913845,0.0062888195,0.0005542311,0.00022824519,0.0007027511,0.0008414665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007036347,0.0005327353,0.00042821027,0.0027854631,0.01859169,0.014272935,0.0015324776,0.008122146,0.0039878213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079016825,0.00028079236,0.00042770564,0.0017734051,0.08707215,0.011199143,0.0045192433,0.011755963,0.00043102115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001310177,0.000006982418,0.00016925372,0.000014982217,0.000001094955,0.000093031544,0.02691014,0.000076094904,0.000015984166,0.9684931,0.0028359795,0.0013821506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040846576,0.000009814192,0.0005640096,0.0002764068,0.0000030748834,0.0002163331,0.040863857,0.0002866075,0.000067870635,0.8285581,0.12913835,0.000011554948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074924156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059255093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074924156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024978098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0152339935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18122965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186529","doi":"10.32920/29896172","title":"Looking at Legal Ethics Through the Lens of Family Violence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lens (geology); Through-the-lens metering; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Optics; Physics","score_opus":0.1696826318832342,"score_gpt":0.46751166106648395,"score_spread":0.2978290291832497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03356201,0.025240926,0.014578404,0.4604512,0.0014179385,0.000042353262,0.000071013645,0.00003420073,0.46460196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9246283,0.012526736,0.004229487,0.030567093,0.0013974303,0.00009064969,0.000032417254,0.00006487307,0.026463002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98700315,0.010409896,0.00014238755,0.0004182469,0.0010340428,0.0009923106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913845,0.0062888195,0.0005542311,0.00022824519,0.0007027511,0.0008414665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007036347,0.0005327353,0.00042821027,0.0027854631,0.01859169,0.014272935,0.0015324776,0.008122146,0.0039878213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079016825,0.00028079236,0.00042770564,0.0017734051,0.08707215,0.011199143,0.0045192433,0.011755963,0.00043102115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001310177,0.000006982418,0.00016925372,0.000014982217,0.000001094955,0.000093031544,0.02691014,0.000076094904,0.000015984166,0.9684931,0.0028359795,0.0013821506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040846576,0.000009814192,0.0005640096,0.0002764068,0.0000030748834,0.0002163331,0.040863857,0.0002866075,0.000067870635,0.8285581,0.12913835,0.000011554948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074924156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059255093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074924156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024978098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0152339935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18122965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413383053","doi":"10.32920/29913059","title":"Pragmatic Assorted Strategies: How Canadian Cause Lawyers Contribute to Social Change","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07732422968167321,"score_gpt":0.41340574872562524,"score_spread":0.336081519043952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413383053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5622775,0.003627275,0.009961563,0.08333069,0.00054088334,0.00080648623,0.00018166848,0.0002513049,0.33902267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98279405,0.00069814414,0.0021906856,0.0023546598,0.000019993286,0.000100463796,0.00004187167,0.00006707571,0.011733093],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9613275,0.02000295,0.00053899636,0.002300967,0.0074842763,0.008345389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811109,0.0075375317,0.0012262311,0.0008752145,0.004531121,0.00471902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020539263,0.00091928785,0.00077708974,0.0060235704,0.06674665,0.020348616,0.005182298,0.005351628,0.009659646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03214542,0.0007767136,0.00083070813,0.005401902,0.047168244,0.006723085,0.019146733,0.0059464676,0.00053429214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013845761,0.000037942144,0.004590422,0.0001103162,0.000014317814,0.0006807908,0.93932086,0.00012493586,0.0002596532,0.03310083,0.0048687444,0.016877383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012750134,0.000020832482,0.0047785337,0.000213143,0.000023754215,0.00011525572,0.859675,0.00026715518,0.00015044774,0.007776561,0.12691617,0.000050357357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.917815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9632719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15721247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15721247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19181314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9775141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413388151","doi":"10.18260/1-2--57116","title":"Reflections on Teaching Ethics Unethically [evidence-based practice, DEI]","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.2726168121599871,"score_gpt":0.5981414042861035,"score_spread":0.3255245921261164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413388151","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038710143,0.005178454,0.00053607015,0.97744286,0.009808487,0.000025164789,0.000009825169,0.000012529916,0.0065995855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019672442,0.007567347,0.0021992074,0.94644135,0.008613013,0.00019321212,0.000018781624,0.00012258012,0.015172129],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9264988,0.04752607,0.0051860316,0.0042194114,0.011626511,0.00494311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74391073,0.21751697,0.0050005848,0.00497183,0.017990092,0.010609838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0961824,0.00095551746,0.0014371928,0.0019733545,0.017255533,0.026206242,0.009011384,0.079925574,0.007379875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19714405,0.0014053327,0.002242054,0.0025251436,0.05844673,0.0239706,0.013961723,0.14410928,0.0017937049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004177038,0.00011594854,0.00020154686,0.00066011574,0.00003163626,0.00067667116,0.04138766,0.00019028228,0.00031322023,0.18735413,0.7398794,0.02914757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005068595,0.00005718308,0.0008313498,0.0036335129,0.00002452897,0.00040273034,0.026975079,0.00017228449,0.00040092046,0.054512467,0.9128251,0.00011408994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03443907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07338951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0961824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018245867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04005438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50866723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413416151","doi":"10.29173/mlj1427","title":"Legal Ethics for Government Lawyers: Lessons from Nunavut","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.11283053611262844,"score_gpt":0.43764900121245376,"score_spread":0.3248184650998253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413416151","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21021658,0.0320058,0.0024416368,0.51993066,0.0015902374,0.00012409603,0.00007484544,0.000046315297,0.23356989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9175272,0.008265339,0.0024076835,0.030642457,0.00016313675,0.000069715825,0.000023120418,0.000056753634,0.04084462],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928186,0.0033284093,0.00013362253,0.00043922855,0.0009307069,0.0023495012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98891056,0.0048177997,0.00038264474,0.00027037895,0.0023633249,0.0032553242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086241495,0.0004124712,0.00051758956,0.0013191742,0.048434343,0.01263165,0.0029482169,0.0060923253,0.0037191105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013048678,0.000525529,0.0004132535,0.0017135891,0.030201895,0.005566197,0.008212163,0.008152631,0.00041650562],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048812548,0.00008022175,0.008228412,0.00016525913,0.000012740559,0.0015243766,0.47068816,0.0003394097,0.00025455156,0.4645204,0.02816195,0.02597569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027685475,0.000025717207,0.00843074,0.001443822,0.000021608588,0.00032558636,0.67309,0.000502785,0.00028597057,0.06540562,0.25035807,0.000082395265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9712775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99049103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8785892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.121410795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16686302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8809011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413421280","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/28b3q_v1","title":"The Use of Psychopathy Assessments in Canadian Case Law: A Quantitative and Qualitative Survey of Court Records from 1980-2023","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychopathy; Law; Survey data collection; Psychology; Survey research; Political science; Criminology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Statistics; Personality; Mathematics","score_opus":0.27616405461847715,"score_gpt":0.54563744652529,"score_spread":0.26947339190681285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413421280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98175335,0.0031888047,0.00024358391,0.0020538324,0.000046845154,0.00020770439,0.0055083022,0.000026231553,0.0069713625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99331665,0.0023065056,0.000410672,0.00035150914,0.000013332001,0.00008044996,0.0017342714,0.000011758629,0.0017747494],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932735,0.0004977602,0.0005924051,0.0004673307,0.0043007815,0.0008681754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489281,0.006053109,0.010459951,0.0007616307,0.029990587,0.0038066288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061206343,0.00029629027,0.00042123644,0.013090293,0.006351344,0.0031349221,0.002434176,0.00069950346,0.0020296257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03874106,0.000513897,0.00040653744,0.0125327995,0.0021376691,0.0012601983,0.0025780054,0.0010803939,0.0003026183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075170225,0.00005683445,0.8628591,0.00049840595,0.00005407507,0.00082614226,0.0795054,0.000118698445,0.00078769797,0.0006119619,0.007028269,0.04757823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027353885,0.000020002484,0.95916766,0.00026115827,0.000012483962,0.00027039458,0.029953754,0.00015346451,0.00013235955,0.00003931212,0.009942525,0.00004416306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9825812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05674531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05674531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05755625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41171795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413462529","doi":"10.29173/mlj1385","title":"Crown Attorneys, The Attorney General, and Judicial Discipline: A Comment on Lauzon v Ontario (Justices of the Peace Review Council)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07076072556794086,"score_gpt":0.3566498019347912,"score_spread":0.28588907636685035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413462529","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0123183215,0.003623682,0.00048999133,0.94694895,0.0024650767,0.000065300745,0.00025473427,0.00004861958,0.033785243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10445645,0.0023125412,0.00067978475,0.8496906,0.0040132673,0.00008495948,0.000064863096,0.00007974099,0.0386178],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903526,0.0012520904,0.00051797775,0.001332485,0.0037738062,0.0027712162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888431,0.005956191,0.0007615654,0.0003494175,0.0025999015,0.0014897586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008035163,0.0007822094,0.0012772286,0.0010633579,0.032335155,0.009354724,0.008540624,0.05259148,0.003860117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019535106,0.0015796594,0.0016581072,0.0022210502,0.018423704,0.0034129429,0.0023639537,0.031339973,0.0010696516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014646414,0.000045139717,0.0049746213,0.00017876104,0.000053728443,0.002201802,0.028455788,0.00036333964,0.0014380966,0.21530664,0.7419938,0.0048417347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034832768,0.000092198025,0.023916826,0.0011197205,0.0003804306,0.00054037437,0.03196569,0.0016379337,0.0019228321,0.03920215,0.8983547,0.0005189308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9566581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9853919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08337381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08337381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08907427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6049222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413465440","doi":"10.29173/mlj1380","title":"The Access to Justice Needs of Manitobans: Legal Practitioners’ Views","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Business; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0823921803741973,"score_gpt":0.4245655815090533,"score_spread":0.34217340113485606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413465440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75329953,0.012572874,0.00053996796,0.1770464,0.0002768839,0.00004034852,0.00020440978,0.00001973157,0.05599995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97498804,0.008210264,0.0005857829,0.010191504,0.00004460632,0.00003262849,0.000055727494,0.000016427708,0.0058750585],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978515,0.00070784474,0.00009102364,0.0001117906,0.0005321779,0.0007056462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942419,0.0019598133,0.0006529192,0.000112865375,0.0015494974,0.0014829503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037450842,0.00024204307,0.00035628234,0.0011229123,0.009905599,0.005116425,0.001136799,0.0018106065,0.0044242237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072167777,0.00035269946,0.00013139326,0.0025966107,0.0056174067,0.002599266,0.0034384504,0.002942063,0.00024432948],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065718916,0.00005405514,0.082018435,0.0009213343,0.00004145334,0.003295475,0.82561,0.0001678337,0.0032849151,0.028570011,0.01747434,0.038496424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004816268,0.000020468933,0.029425656,0.0008460746,0.000022127022,0.000497631,0.8913511,0.00007136678,0.00020396493,0.0017275095,0.07579927,0.000029958854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49844298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7552137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014302637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03567565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99108344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413465663","doi":"10.29173/mlj1375","title":"Leading by Example: The Jurisprudence of Chief Justice Richard J.F. Chartier","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Management; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.04243924444402177,"score_gpt":0.367892419507148,"score_spread":0.32545317506312627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413465663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055929616,0.02299353,0.008494784,0.282021,0.005320325,0.00012818718,0.00023847373,0.00016752965,0.62470657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6669849,0.006775807,0.005523232,0.076781146,0.0009242966,0.000053458356,0.000101721555,0.00010496726,0.24275035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960211,0.0008685357,0.00006753312,0.0006803709,0.0012511937,0.0011112874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99493474,0.001235997,0.00027743733,0.000144474,0.0026744227,0.00073301804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035594823,0.0003452484,0.00024868493,0.0013076246,0.022726461,0.0053373873,0.0011359315,0.003657182,0.004597496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010566042,0.00023467893,0.0003059994,0.0016231269,0.006974534,0.0016570836,0.0017877333,0.004504431,0.000775565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054746,0.000031902196,0.0068570776,0.00011931791,0.00001864121,0.0020265752,0.034995917,0.00045437764,0.0009625125,0.6235411,0.29217446,0.03876335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001004572,0.000021859265,0.007499058,0.00017177599,0.000018638968,0.0002919081,0.00870986,0.000187034,0.0006181692,0.015111899,0.96731526,0.0000444817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7817595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9246915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7817595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02157481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056016397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4390515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413561615","doi":"10.64628/aam.kkg3upyp9","title":"COVID-19: Don’t make university students choose between education and legal rights","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Legal education; Political science; Virology; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.06691779344499749,"score_gpt":0.4229838240640015,"score_spread":0.356066030619004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413561615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09267799,0.00040038375,0.009362765,0.1387995,0.0015791118,0.00007803536,0.000944295,0.00031140997,0.7558465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8626245,0.00017165659,0.003906007,0.018974181,0.0003738157,0.00013417537,0.00052051735,0.0003108074,0.1129843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897461,0.00355388,0.00027290155,0.001240375,0.0030000182,0.0021867098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9616073,0.018850287,0.001985939,0.0048834365,0.0055132783,0.0071598166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012442127,0.00031636027,0.00060851045,0.00072731083,0.005733872,0.0109414235,0.0013190667,0.0068066553,0.0909404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0512199,0.00032419746,0.00067686813,0.0009049916,0.005877022,0.006756967,0.0070434767,0.0077412394,0.0107354615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017730318,0.00029089244,0.006746181,0.00007654845,0.000016046284,0.00009269433,0.0019102544,0.00032957495,0.00034540807,0.85034835,0.098759,0.040907785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016692322,0.00020089652,0.0081438245,0.00028493823,0.00004196075,0.0001703056,0.0076480117,0.0028732566,0.0025180078,0.70171535,0.27615422,0.000082293955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008055352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010448838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0909404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004136741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012168708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30422592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413620206","doi":"10.64628/aam.yxjcvccax","title":"Morality isn’t a compass — it’s a calculator","year":2017,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Compass; Calculator; Morality; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Cartography; Geography; Operating system","score_opus":0.17256524859716596,"score_gpt":0.48029977314786987,"score_spread":0.30773452455070394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413620206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009931589,0.0037671593,0.039579723,0.4584152,0.007918638,0.00012546963,0.000073352785,0.0005193419,0.4796695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6755664,0.0024194652,0.038351554,0.12600711,0.0039609605,0.00040080273,0.000108868924,0.0009709237,0.15221395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97896314,0.010236008,0.000823991,0.0016868367,0.007253241,0.0010367483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94042605,0.026337935,0.0033033122,0.0071845427,0.014314177,0.008433832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021686222,0.0007142836,0.0008706694,0.0033405852,0.007925473,0.016033443,0.0021809144,0.0056307726,0.03117007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0870069,0.0006461648,0.00072475703,0.0015682926,0.05350821,0.021335453,0.008445719,0.014933044,0.0050000944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001131069,0.00006719566,0.0009155057,0.00007487723,0.000020409809,0.000038296865,0.0019456099,0.0001677723,0.00009127408,0.9295324,0.040635288,0.026500076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026186945,0.000028542085,0.0005709136,0.0003339665,0.000018936691,0.000095721654,0.002375012,0.00036013837,0.00020653097,0.86480546,0.13113712,0.000041430863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005031263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055231145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03117007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071199825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014976059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11468911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413654283","doi":"10.64628/aam.ucmp7d5mu","title":"A good first step towards diverse, impartial Canadian juries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07108199636161976,"score_gpt":0.3919760693293866,"score_spread":0.32089407296776684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413654283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016526103,0.0052698296,0.0259424,0.60115033,0.016256277,0.0019442284,0.0015329703,0.0008303166,0.3305476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28892767,0.004112325,0.10435249,0.28867075,0.003955467,0.0024736114,0.002354873,0.0010759936,0.3040767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8838648,0.023954768,0.004165816,0.009302283,0.05594743,0.022764983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7368744,0.0338309,0.0028716703,0.021862376,0.16000997,0.044550627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1091353,0.0014845062,0.0026649628,0.008964579,0.06985724,0.040404543,0.011138372,0.0226149,0.046476897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22058661,0.0017658864,0.002327117,0.0052459883,0.017253203,0.014200107,0.022759186,0.032446068,0.009317316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014600574,0.00022704386,0.0032501293,0.00023586715,0.00012012074,0.00042264842,0.008562726,0.0009368659,0.00094138976,0.33890873,0.55563384,0.09061465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098090415,0.00007770476,0.005669558,0.0010267858,0.00007023134,0.00020449376,0.010095901,0.0010057801,0.0010036961,0.07356843,0.90688723,0.00029212813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84757817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9301045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15242183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09077255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41010278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.658604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413790402","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/28b3q_v2","title":"The Use of Psychopathy Assessments in Canadian Case Law: A Quantitative and Qualitative Survey of Court Records from 1980-2023","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychopathy; Survey data collection; Psychology; Qualitative property; Political science; Social psychology; Statistics; Personality; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3566998473778279,"score_gpt":0.5550894954391922,"score_spread":0.19838964806136428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413790402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817076,0.003200791,0.00024381658,0.0020517702,0.00004695053,0.00020818015,0.0055254414,0.0000263027,0.0069891936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932989,0.0023159157,0.00041154915,0.0003518579,0.000013346875,0.00008073844,0.0017383627,0.000011787746,0.0017776134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932568,0.0004983182,0.00059534895,0.00046835997,0.004311374,0.0008697316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489016,0.0060708034,0.010491263,0.000761458,0.02996507,0.003809889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061314455,0.00029646515,0.000421559,0.01312767,0.006363519,0.0031424596,0.0024344006,0.00070033496,0.0020374167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038783748,0.00051415176,0.00040721465,0.012580553,0.0021393886,0.0012628952,0.0025840288,0.0010793055,0.0003032572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007505537,0.00005672721,0.8630242,0.0004994059,0.00005393455,0.00082862907,0.079367965,0.000118461256,0.00078529224,0.0006133499,0.007037277,0.04753978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027429633,0.000020001447,0.95901185,0.00026261175,0.00001252449,0.00027147765,0.030067153,0.0001538773,0.00013259248,0.000039415754,0.009981497,0.000044144686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98252493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056812715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056812715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057555296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41220707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803146","doi":"10.29173/mlj1448","title":"Preface and Issue Overview","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Conscience; Government (linguistics); Law; Legislature; Executive branch; Political science; Loyalty; Representation (politics); History; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04891198903226107,"score_gpt":0.4034369761268036,"score_spread":0.35452498709454255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012159789,0.02536562,0.0015127764,0.07152619,0.36260843,0.00095968455,0.009064055,0.0011756563,0.5265717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044930624,0.014991729,0.00091241713,0.016128061,0.052679222,0.00050878874,0.007244274,0.0007561662,0.9022863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986558,0.000121693345,0.000094524665,0.00016648823,0.0007836168,0.00017788501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99034727,0.0007126485,0.00035049298,0.0004943388,0.0068713925,0.0012237858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020752787,0.0009972778,0.00083403144,0.0062424247,0.0052012126,0.007420547,0.0019732465,0.0024860909,0.24060656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010566285,0.0005697265,0.00044136567,0.0060115885,0.0010376435,0.0037936266,0.002790883,0.004168215,0.14259133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086606215,0.00001128236,0.00009268883,0.000118207274,9.596088e-7,0.000026841191,0.000078653036,0.000017910876,0.00006182886,0.0017688345,0.98213047,0.015683677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011029143,0.000004190095,0.0003014213,0.00013994605,8.258911e-7,0.000015537924,0.000066189285,0.000008328121,0.000019478108,0.00024408092,0.9991961,0.0000026116527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038835738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05490566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24060656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005104015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010084558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8049091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413821460","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v55i3.190475","title":"What Is Prohibited? Non-Academic Conduct Policies in Canadian Universities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.03971742896507052,"score_gpt":0.4084422059287941,"score_spread":0.3687247769637236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413821460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70904607,0.0032718969,0.003735512,0.07524759,0.00023715448,0.00025309675,0.00052266015,0.00011268279,0.20757322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98529494,0.0011329674,0.0010751002,0.0026267797,0.000018336548,0.000029130759,0.000100236204,0.000021654543,0.009700839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737075,0.004498619,0.0011219735,0.0012675466,0.00927093,0.010133465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9494634,0.014127049,0.0052480064,0.0020407606,0.01662024,0.012500436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01355491,0.0002609434,0.0004988479,0.0028514413,0.034810152,0.012471599,0.0032513137,0.003576115,0.0030919753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0396789,0.0005294815,0.0006593708,0.0051649935,0.013172737,0.0033295823,0.0041147806,0.004405759,0.00023136809],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015727006,0.0002209946,0.0814389,0.0004119293,0.000045430825,0.0012386362,0.10732316,0.0041217594,0.001364468,0.6928148,0.0254383,0.085424386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054043125,0.0001281442,0.25580686,0.0015933778,0.00010421666,0.00056794897,0.30536214,0.007111665,0.0033131358,0.06041782,0.3649074,0.0006332062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24121298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24121298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43602604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8800854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413838529","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp19809","title":"Ethics and the Professional Practice of Family Lawyers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Legal ethics; Professional ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.2005240152208256,"score_gpt":0.5238302371174278,"score_spread":0.3233062218966022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413838529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49658814,0.014057686,0.009234456,0.27443475,0.0007640238,0.00030808503,0.000091349844,0.000074634896,0.20444696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97934407,0.0020017587,0.0017688074,0.00507773,0.00007853685,0.000051449755,0.00001346031,0.000016055616,0.011648101],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9608856,0.028850967,0.0009031053,0.0010703704,0.004883261,0.0034067596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9547281,0.021732233,0.0061736116,0.0017496455,0.006071092,0.009545195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014811414,0.00012809671,0.00024149653,0.0012032974,0.022609202,0.008852278,0.0015996897,0.0030439065,0.0037985004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040795278,0.0003417144,0.00011432084,0.0013906413,0.02635385,0.0034817692,0.004507843,0.0029897145,0.0004924123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025668498,0.00010291642,0.023585793,0.00015449467,0.000008446541,0.0017099216,0.8090911,0.00014681165,0.00038670644,0.07145783,0.029858915,0.06347136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013337038,0.00005525424,0.013780296,0.0006769116,0.0000037792272,0.001218276,0.60279834,0.00025105552,0.00020788715,0.024546003,0.35641244,0.000036482845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1791095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2845595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1791095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034987785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07186941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35613394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413859660","doi":"10.1080/07294360.2025.2514505","title":"Centring First Nations knowings in the literature review: a focus on decolonising law curriculum","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Research & Development","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Centring; Curriculum; Focus (optics); Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Political science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.041858245083769306,"score_gpt":0.4585415680573213,"score_spread":0.41668332297355204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413859660","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009081345,0.964653,0.0011027898,0.0153907165,0.0018143294,0.000071741626,0.00005625702,0.000014858965,0.007814922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08935408,0.89773524,0.002880086,0.006681757,0.00092141266,0.00016406299,0.00012195789,0.000021793003,0.0021195938],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98945767,0.005567507,0.0015659822,0.0007556504,0.0021198995,0.00053345296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9176135,0.0670217,0.005717698,0.0012976353,0.00715747,0.0011919508],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01571937,0.00039103845,0.0014900636,0.020161835,0.002549235,0.009079004,0.001166044,0.002415003,0.002182679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037777588,0.00046381584,0.0008226924,0.02027351,0.0046643144,0.010696528,0.0036943674,0.0030640254,0.00032571398],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095495576,0.000111063695,0.0050858925,0.17954229,0.00053360057,0.001754755,0.09360171,0.0005651161,0.0027113196,0.14841951,0.037897944,0.52968127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015410826,0.00015906671,0.012649849,0.25645602,0.0005303523,0.0018084047,0.073903225,0.00023538583,0.00082542945,0.010966536,0.6423813,0.00006911911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008674539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03499235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99745077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005869981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030017583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08313298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414240183","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v10i1.8451","title":"The State of Court Administration in Ontario: A Preliminary Analysis of the Post-COVID Environment in the Ontario Court of Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Economic Justice; State (computer science); Administration of justice; Federal court; Quality (philosophy); Court decision","score_opus":0.0664099398318384,"score_gpt":0.3497512421572769,"score_spread":0.28334130232543847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414240183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7352209,0.0018324015,0.00064138474,0.02455056,0.00007638629,0.00026423208,0.0012093291,0.000033394066,0.23617136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743527,0.0009612957,0.00035266252,0.0008524741,0.000028292958,0.000044717894,0.00023504939,0.000014289617,0.023158358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992769,0.00067835674,0.00021954277,0.00029461316,0.0029024056,0.00313616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897111,0.0012364528,0.001093735,0.00027787374,0.0058491295,0.0018317889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025233522,0.00018746947,0.00036660352,0.0024265826,0.018463496,0.008880823,0.001691354,0.0014204009,0.005626873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009545287,0.00047826627,0.0005174739,0.006110392,0.0069596157,0.0020344744,0.002353411,0.0019922906,0.00030440628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030572896,0.00015544561,0.22442079,0.0003788774,0.000117662064,0.0027903572,0.2338763,0.0025904018,0.0026196435,0.44204238,0.043472648,0.047229894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039281415,0.0000801684,0.71129537,0.00028341886,0.00009988125,0.00015456033,0.14535499,0.0018161663,0.00037839144,0.008353345,0.13197723,0.00016708212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99756646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2922574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2922574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22775662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8208811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414249195","doi":"10.1017/s0021855325100703","title":"How Far Are Kenya’s Courts? Distance as a Barrier to Justice in Kenya","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Population; Distribution (mathematics); Rural area; Information and Communications Technology; Rural population","score_opus":0.02326194269251455,"score_gpt":0.3570913743589067,"score_spread":0.3338294316663922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414249195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9563708,0.0018292646,0.00037925603,0.004396545,0.00003254632,0.000038959308,0.00029060108,0.000004611003,0.036657386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760133,0.0008603243,0.00018006157,0.00014314009,0.000007072995,0.0000126877685,0.000046341906,0.0000016213818,0.0011474366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990079,0.0003787326,0.000054866123,0.00007832019,0.00020816203,0.00027197727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760747,0.0008290197,0.0008554526,0.00003632684,0.0003254316,0.00034632406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065009773,0.00012890837,0.00023382239,0.0011001287,0.0041552554,0.002597951,0.00049572915,0.0005116306,0.008461014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004189085,0.00014148487,0.00011875297,0.0023520107,0.0016887238,0.002125851,0.001875325,0.0007991787,0.00037090693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019712451,0.000289901,0.7391536,0.0010846719,0.0001318581,0.0047100885,0.08456018,0.0014915932,0.0017632697,0.05482249,0.013041691,0.09875354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017256905,0.00019212943,0.6888152,0.0016617429,0.00009116462,0.0014340784,0.25028974,0.001343832,0.0005293897,0.0046648867,0.050874464,0.00008620417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.116560794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28175816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116560794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031085755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032125178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23176467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414308736","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2025.2543718","title":"Revisiting Professionalism and Breach of Confidentiality: Are “Neutral” Conditions the Answer?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The American Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Liability; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.11543127380572936,"score_gpt":0.4620819013892313,"score_spread":0.3466506275835019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414308736","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039357765,0.0006232071,0.000100713274,0.99338233,0.0014999787,0.0000036398383,0.000007209087,0.0000048645006,0.003984562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070120213,0.00035524231,0.00014869348,0.9866846,0.0023956776,0.000014569677,0.000005352417,0.000008084938,0.0033757482],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803474,0.008441447,0.0013671448,0.0016442044,0.0051807845,0.0030190756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95073354,0.035994362,0.0019061292,0.0013223735,0.0058068414,0.0042367433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025890753,0.00048498242,0.0011479952,0.0007131015,0.012014265,0.008636259,0.003259776,0.1253241,0.0075174733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07365279,0.00073861086,0.0013287144,0.00050241384,0.021956004,0.014125502,0.0064938385,0.08291259,0.0039352276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056397632,0.00006061707,0.00088408176,0.000104946965,0.0000140676575,0.002203699,0.0047297734,0.000098007986,0.000614698,0.23206913,0.74096835,0.018196194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009591408,0.00008939494,0.0012096397,0.00091235846,0.000025160853,0.002275009,0.007037115,0.00076666864,0.0006492023,0.16814792,0.8186789,0.00011268702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031349804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042393822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1253241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0132179335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027506962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13692504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414328779","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-96132-0_8410","title":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Legal Studies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.055603905620074,"score_gpt":0.36849146626370655,"score_spread":0.31288756064363255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414328779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040970504,0.018470073,0.000342868,0.0124842515,0.0017880554,0.000059254282,0.006552256,0.00018485126,0.95970863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005708466,0.00761226,0.000642752,0.0010570955,0.00012761868,0.00005339497,0.0013547497,0.00010192499,0.98334175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708515,0.00014527077,0.000110376925,0.00025426032,0.001962772,0.0004421098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996876,0.00038968216,0.00008422265,0.00029642216,0.0019390923,0.0004145774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015457548,0.00089876103,0.0011091141,0.0038913796,0.007864761,0.008334529,0.0018171213,0.0033867096,0.24071854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004716081,0.0007476022,0.0006543305,0.0065499516,0.0025642945,0.0026402336,0.0020816312,0.00406197,0.0414984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001188891,0.000011107668,0.00014591799,0.00013884448,0.0000035178289,0.000037878774,0.0001624043,0.00009186061,0.000032044234,0.11417574,0.8470268,0.03816208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025416891,0.0000011197675,0.00040345363,0.00009957537,0.0000022475317,0.000010123701,0.00012397865,0.000035480116,0.0000235076,0.0040392177,0.9952527,0.000005888199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9400133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96445006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24071854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036364608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11682832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8052838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414402343","doi":"10.56238/sevened2025.029-089","title":"DIAGNOSTIC REDUCTIONISM AND THE SCIENTIFIC QUALIFICATION OF EXPERT TESTIMONY IN FAMILY LAW","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Seven Editora eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Relevance (law); Phenomenon; Reasonable doubt; Alienation; Expert witness; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.03826863437056187,"score_gpt":0.3461668717703095,"score_spread":0.30789823739974764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414402343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024595326,0.06953514,0.04534102,0.15961078,0.0036329587,0.00018147989,0.000050050057,0.00009685418,0.69695634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8459856,0.031925045,0.03208209,0.02115701,0.0030275874,0.00032599363,0.000057285597,0.000073911615,0.06536546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9743543,0.01886687,0.0005134914,0.00064405205,0.005150105,0.0004712399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92697495,0.06707408,0.0015940861,0.0016546914,0.0023525401,0.00034964315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018253133,0.00033859492,0.00031980945,0.003748204,0.003200304,0.005447549,0.0013523785,0.0031210852,0.0026916591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048928116,0.00027803626,0.00024181587,0.0018113822,0.038923506,0.0053407676,0.0037223187,0.0041180975,0.00036483468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007125175,0.00001788038,0.00027411617,0.00025141746,0.000003748078,0.00017186417,0.014823236,0.00018982474,0.000112370835,0.9217899,0.011956875,0.050401654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011340989,0.000032248554,0.0008723192,0.0017339347,0.000009956599,0.00055044115,0.007396203,0.0007921313,0.00064761646,0.80553424,0.1823982,0.000021346543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002251648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030953295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018253133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005485871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006339844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09653294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414429367","doi":"10.29242/lawstats.2024","title":"ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 2024","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ARL academic law and medical library statistics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law library; Academic library; Official statistics; Statistical analysis","score_opus":0.023295787634295666,"score_gpt":0.3472992829744113,"score_spread":0.32400349534011563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414429367","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007174975,0.002987172,0.0022321746,0.0061627817,0.0024619105,0.00018562263,0.60400605,0.005172223,0.37607452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043494054,0.00429876,0.0041254046,0.0028554513,0.0015242345,0.0003819819,0.41399986,0.0018936951,0.56657124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957618,0.00031099826,0.0002680525,0.00020803628,0.0031877607,0.00026334965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98590964,0.0025926984,0.0009914058,0.00084788277,0.009038099,0.00062028045],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021231591,0.0010040667,0.0006510278,0.00865559,0.0011601018,0.004598159,0.0011382977,0.00087372685,0.13429707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017364725,0.0007169737,0.000493327,0.01974861,0.0004003051,0.0022399654,0.0010527776,0.0020040064,0.20807114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028923282,0.0000024742817,0.000118934004,0.0000172936,7.7220415e-7,0.0000019861723,0.0000055666933,0.00003182628,0.000005389818,0.00075431506,0.991497,0.007561579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003253451,0.000003203472,0.0016857914,0.000070404174,0.0000015789282,0.00001070912,0.000019102781,0.00010142766,0.000033044977,0.0005153454,0.99754864,0.000007382809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18140163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19047908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005775576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015283352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44926846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414513469","doi":"10.1080/01639374.2025.2562548","title":"Cataloging Ethics Definitions Revisited: Practitioner Perspectives Five Years Later","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cataloging & Classification Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bibliographical Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Cataloging; Resource Description and Access","score_opus":0.10551369373338743,"score_gpt":0.40415947372963956,"score_spread":0.29864577999625214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414513469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063062884,0.066623226,0.029714467,0.78606874,0.009166413,0.000113569506,0.00012928664,0.00011842123,0.045003008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7705581,0.04153843,0.024571879,0.13708626,0.0043667094,0.0003412305,0.00021009275,0.00030300365,0.021024158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92768013,0.054285422,0.0041915723,0.003300773,0.008223226,0.0023188484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.855313,0.10728929,0.0041038496,0.0036337953,0.026297107,0.0033629474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09038575,0.0006281904,0.0010065372,0.007828031,0.01153384,0.02962431,0.002443345,0.014206417,0.004305226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0987371,0.0007153473,0.0009756344,0.013952633,0.03883363,0.03855281,0.01359943,0.022556424,0.0008470656],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034907513,0.00007958105,0.0026883157,0.00035015476,0.000010874414,0.0005027147,0.24740604,0.00023061108,0.0002825952,0.66822517,0.03319049,0.046998583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013018629,0.00005106823,0.0014214785,0.001600029,0.000009916346,0.00046361552,0.34377563,0.00069882255,0.00044487164,0.06265155,0.5888051,0.000064844695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027111765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023424542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09038575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03278008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028856993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47801125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414590834","doi":"10.1002/eahr.60011","title":"Broadening Core Research Ethics Principles: Insights from Research Conducted with Black Communities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Human Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; McGill University; University of Ottawa; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Beneficence; Research ethics; Interpretation (philosophy); Outreach; Respect for persons; Limiting; Transformative learning; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.8500494897726547,"score_gpt":0.6703714055294517,"score_spread":0.17967808424320297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414590834","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13312945,0.016207116,0.09501346,0.61330545,0.002619044,0.0016258911,0.00009670756,0.00007186826,0.13793103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8569119,0.008394806,0.042277783,0.08123107,0.00064292137,0.002248534,0.00005273207,0.0001370139,0.008103164],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7556751,0.21676211,0.0028844082,0.0034283425,0.011559031,0.009691018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.705833,0.24603921,0.008743208,0.0058647785,0.02073639,0.012783439],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24552296,0.0010358933,0.0016739857,0.004704162,0.04833766,0.02475417,0.0051298966,0.012776558,0.002277895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12948336,0.0011433712,0.0013560072,0.0037017213,0.104533546,0.018612703,0.021624481,0.019296004,0.0003835173],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018110977,0.000057530386,0.0011338393,0.00029364432,0.000009200771,0.00061854563,0.773962,0.000087417786,0.0002080538,0.21093363,0.0031745147,0.009503539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002630079,0.00006786313,0.0015291729,0.0021245673,0.000026107014,0.0005948067,0.6849495,0.00034731397,0.0004506547,0.20175406,0.108062185,0.00006749504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04653704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07895846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98722345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023986984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09989401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93040454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414798560","doi":"10.1093/analys/anaf061","title":"Blaming yourself for wronging yourself","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Blame; Moral responsibility; Counterfactual thinking; Motivated reasoning","score_opus":0.02877624108100612,"score_gpt":0.4783858464972945,"score_spread":0.44960960541628836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414798560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5690044,0.0020095217,0.034040697,0.10873315,0.001044376,0.00011941826,0.0000517248,0.0001564997,0.28484014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872709,0.0003134752,0.0020324287,0.0031501204,0.000055623714,0.000010429361,0.0000069322637,0.000015161903,0.0071448768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.990413,0.006404412,0.0002507457,0.00041317331,0.0018687076,0.0006498722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95741576,0.021797521,0.008393307,0.0039544087,0.0064380113,0.0020009908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01072124,0.00024337415,0.0003050969,0.001204918,0.0038609493,0.0033400217,0.0010038246,0.002933155,0.011493464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036643263,0.00013587014,0.00029390614,0.00051681144,0.014037449,0.0033700222,0.0025773982,0.00339095,0.0010848127],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007099796,0.0006056615,0.041421067,0.00030582387,0.000052084943,0.0009289773,0.0704833,0.0009027907,0.0024783951,0.7898213,0.019248426,0.073681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000406896,0.00045818277,0.027256105,0.0019739731,0.00008487236,0.0021933862,0.10198886,0.0056397226,0.009370517,0.68470126,0.16616325,0.00012931091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001998594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025532003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011493464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002661833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004841408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05669999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414958007","doi":"10.1177/14782103251386648","title":"Judging the institution: Simulated jurisprudence and the governance of professional futures","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Futures in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Western University","keywords":"Deliberation; Corporate governance; Futures studies; Futures contract; Interdependence; Dialogic; Public policy; Scholarship","score_opus":0.010310915028476975,"score_gpt":0.41906470741397284,"score_spread":0.40875379238549586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414958007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45962667,0.00055115356,0.2363964,0.037528686,0.0001779956,0.00032048897,0.00013862787,0.00042838906,0.26483148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864565,0.00009132492,0.010440574,0.00018939987,0.0000060176053,0.000046755005,0.00002025439,0.000020122814,0.0027289907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.988296,0.008806162,0.00024384019,0.00074680237,0.0010773874,0.0008297278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859903,0.008693644,0.0010306524,0.0021122734,0.0011218583,0.0010511756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012386247,0.00026979123,0.00033912473,0.00084673753,0.006162812,0.009096025,0.0016128861,0.0024135022,0.004369921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026779309,0.00032872337,0.0004965173,0.00065246574,0.025704077,0.0059225173,0.0064711464,0.0021642642,0.0003369382],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055181274,0.00004305406,0.0044395593,0.000048788785,0.000014822265,0.00023103264,0.029781427,0.026394237,0.0005971143,0.9266516,0.00097170373,0.0107715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008147612,0.000087822635,0.0027028883,0.00018597639,0.000025420044,0.000087894696,0.028743703,0.06970822,0.001761286,0.7917683,0.104756705,0.00009030263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08390667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07204614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08390667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019202504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02145251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16683656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415005235","doi":"10.62889/2025/dyb.1009","title":"Profit, Power, and Pedagogy: The Minnesota READ Act","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Equity and Social Justice in Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Legislation; Technocracy; Reading (process); Literacy; Rhetoric; Curriculum; Corporate governance; Intervention (counseling); Citizen journalism","score_opus":0.05006054343760235,"score_gpt":0.4867667103658752,"score_spread":0.43670616692827285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415005235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64722776,0.0014568602,0.0120068425,0.07681461,0.00032878053,0.00014155368,0.00015858251,0.00009264955,0.26177236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974018,0.000198546,0.0027616862,0.003961095,0.000022092541,0.00006926834,0.000026271695,0.000019835057,0.01892322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909513,0.0056116073,0.00024606916,0.0010258105,0.0014847768,0.0006804147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98851997,0.0071642874,0.001194242,0.000918154,0.0011845884,0.0010188902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009805691,0.00020446343,0.00014845846,0.00061144284,0.007927138,0.005798089,0.0009760039,0.0015241324,0.0023602198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013966273,0.0002820002,0.000164983,0.0004260334,0.013669527,0.0026799582,0.004492473,0.0026430527,0.00021471099],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062285755,0.00013292265,0.041263435,0.0001371719,0.000018937639,0.00055256137,0.19612175,0.0011682997,0.0012336215,0.69141656,0.017592542,0.050299913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003255316,0.0002433653,0.10397954,0.00084390945,0.00009939156,0.0003297031,0.25625193,0.0036011832,0.0047553554,0.07169033,0.55804425,0.00012837788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31205487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6081326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31205487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0273249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02827175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.620477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415144847","doi":"10.6000/2817-2302.2025.04.07","title":"International Survey about Perceptions of Courts’ Role in Addressing Social Issues through Problem-Solving Courts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Nevada, Reno","keywords":"Attribution; Perception; Economic Justice; Social responsibility; Social issues; Collective responsibility","score_opus":0.04157253043237718,"score_gpt":0.40965758809228225,"score_spread":0.36808505765990507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415144847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940096,0.0001032623,0.000108624095,0.0004443654,0.000011734301,0.000044598208,0.00042651332,0.0000046106657,0.0048466567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979797,0.00025806396,0.00024102935,0.0003068718,0.000012095508,0.000037571746,0.00041420662,0.000003535392,0.0007468757],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984297,0.00058176956,0.00019036372,0.000114638526,0.00048163283,0.00020185302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98672885,0.0021411586,0.0061781774,0.00035169025,0.0030141806,0.0015859656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003181903,0.00013639314,0.00020316064,0.001008553,0.000688995,0.0008567203,0.0002473819,0.00041080505,0.0025733171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009054006,0.00014685623,0.00020974185,0.0010477543,0.000709207,0.0008046938,0.0007425305,0.00092034996,0.00037352098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023343237,0.00010171695,0.97609836,0.00006557107,0.000030635158,0.00006180422,0.009375308,0.00003867447,0.0002722105,0.00018318307,0.00206369,0.011685475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025906943,0.000047347276,0.9864108,0.000046785713,0.000008620853,0.00007807847,0.01099369,0.00010321949,0.00007693266,0.00003206324,0.0021928388,0.000007035652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024932953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04187254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024932953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009176531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009615019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049575627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415223254","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i2.1871","title":"Reflections on Equity in Higher Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Charter; Equity (law); Racism; Harassment; Ambivalence; Normative","score_opus":0.23436625003309317,"score_gpt":0.5488728815015316,"score_spread":0.3145066314684384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415223254","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005571911,0.009460439,0.0012593414,0.8311995,0.0025667273,0.000021650772,0.00003329838,0.000015703441,0.14987141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5381101,0.008178885,0.0012432958,0.3737531,0.0052650436,0.000076113254,0.00003906919,0.00007677308,0.073257685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97496426,0.008422835,0.00029124934,0.0011785439,0.0071039004,0.008039171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821186,0.010668011,0.00048333334,0.00059728196,0.002926774,0.0032060165],"candidate_categories":["sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021540564,0.000540811,0.0006226027,0.0017011637,0.025812993,0.023093529,0.0025355406,0.013166838,0.010372443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026372649,0.00032877855,0.00056737434,0.0021860225,0.080188274,0.014619159,0.01517184,0.0221484,0.00067484425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056478652,0.00001116024,0.00019250782,0.000022700762,0.0000021770513,0.00003358954,0.007391859,0.00008209712,0.000021035677,0.93957835,0.0458046,0.006854318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021575795,0.000017155473,0.0010059167,0.00045476347,0.000005858382,0.00004627011,0.02483391,0.0001391736,0.00019173363,0.36057845,0.6126762,0.00002902867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40778282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41152856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056750897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074011266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81081855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415230584","doi":"10.1609/aies.v8i2.36651","title":"Write on Paper, Wrong in Practice: Why LLMs Still Struggle with Writing Clinical Notes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Sociotechnical system; Documentation; Technical writing; Bespoke; Qualitative research; Technical documentation","score_opus":0.122319563470876,"score_gpt":0.4663468857142978,"score_spread":0.3440273222434218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415230584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7739435,0.006044386,0.018447833,0.16794446,0.0015211055,0.00032451857,0.0002559796,0.00074167486,0.030776476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617743,0.002215156,0.008995877,0.015675614,0.00020733014,0.00019915806,0.00011818972,0.0004099091,0.010404427],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9467239,0.026288565,0.004969851,0.0036864495,0.013814393,0.0045168055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83530456,0.08627195,0.026575133,0.008073876,0.025291143,0.01848335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03263942,0.0005120531,0.00064139254,0.0021321734,0.013572112,0.013014982,0.0032314567,0.0047217137,0.0061946185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20682688,0.0013963884,0.0006391329,0.0022161028,0.0150967855,0.011304883,0.010438445,0.0062178853,0.0027515145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010069036,0.0000820269,0.029247507,0.00046292573,0.000029078194,0.0050333156,0.8736377,0.00013739397,0.0012617849,0.003785801,0.026516303,0.05970545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037253893,0.000121750505,0.0133372955,0.0013357154,0.000025080899,0.005376279,0.84798014,0.0008169535,0.00076118414,0.004917882,0.12514327,0.00014715298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04261113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07010937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04261113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015457898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0341211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17261589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415396814","doi":"10.69569/jip.2025.603","title":"Developing Research Skills in Criminology Students Through Interdisciplinary Approaches","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of interdisciplinary perspectives","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Competence (human resources); Research design; Educational research; Research methodology; Critical thinking; Student engagement","score_opus":0.28596062565517527,"score_gpt":0.5556089831708301,"score_spread":0.2696483575156548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415396814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825503,0.00072783884,0.0032235293,0.003515776,0.00006171047,0.00026313218,0.000021977037,0.000061819024,0.009573814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98126066,0.0012534097,0.011384416,0.0015967102,0.000055760105,0.00027354812,0.000041874096,0.000014923566,0.0041187173],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98917305,0.0063871285,0.00053740817,0.00065083307,0.0022008363,0.0010508349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9448616,0.021826321,0.010937518,0.0035930234,0.006154473,0.012627002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012935387,0.00043039108,0.00043874537,0.0033165528,0.003168088,0.0063259145,0.0012643967,0.0011113426,0.0034930327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035055038,0.0005710541,0.00057351054,0.0010820616,0.002466901,0.0019599285,0.006545463,0.0024711685,0.00093699276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015146373,0.008314822,0.32111531,0.0011477835,0.000109043634,0.0017048414,0.2191343,0.0005614688,0.01457566,0.0055192523,0.0071715643,0.42049456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014658483,0.004871196,0.5462463,0.002675546,0.00020099903,0.0063327732,0.27589062,0.0019763059,0.010462405,0.017884253,0.13306265,0.00025033302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007574993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022551334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012935387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015104436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00922408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06840968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416271814","doi":"10.15294/iccle.v4i3.36552","title":"Repositioning the Nigerian Lawyer Through Mandatory Continuing Legal Education: Developing a Cross-Border Approach to Legal Education","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Redeemer University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Legal profession; Legal research; Legal practice; Legal opinion; Continuing education; Practice of law; Legal realism; International Legal English Certificate","score_opus":0.041423108864517916,"score_gpt":0.4831764797376377,"score_spread":0.44175337087311983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416271814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52894914,0.028360255,0.024471153,0.16320083,0.0016640597,0.0006893052,0.000028210614,0.00009541344,0.2525417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412787,0.0105984155,0.024462394,0.005291474,0.00017500042,0.000115524446,0.00002637431,0.000011154377,0.018040897],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769384,0.0010380809,0.00014045202,0.000212231,0.00038849376,0.0005269109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506027,0.0017134227,0.000721446,0.00015130646,0.000665618,0.001687944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003660596,0.00016297042,0.00017015269,0.0009934717,0.0042874427,0.007111224,0.000867742,0.0031320504,0.003620529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006529867,0.00020645752,0.0001933938,0.0004901745,0.0027921228,0.0051102806,0.0058865603,0.0030836363,0.000449047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004058475,0.0011127818,0.024273023,0.0013272185,0.000015539315,0.0042322846,0.09670052,0.00079203665,0.004320323,0.3044018,0.011096899,0.55168694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005942654,0.0010481738,0.07476227,0.0113758985,0.000055902896,0.0071818433,0.22306505,0.0040703244,0.004378144,0.06831735,0.6055623,0.00012331046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040395893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012604666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007111224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003881736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018569387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028164089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416290295","doi":"10.29173/alr2629","title":"History of the Faculty of Law","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.07485331042993329,"score_gpt":0.40361533082796314,"score_spread":0.3287620203980298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416290295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006071703,0.10574187,0.0010921767,0.35725284,0.023274057,0.00016801017,0.0005804552,0.00017450063,0.50564444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14289269,0.038493615,0.0013084274,0.091948576,0.0077383784,0.00015888058,0.00026847146,0.00017292207,0.717018],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98722667,0.002049446,0.00034319388,0.0012732669,0.0064729727,0.00263448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733976,0.0067705438,0.00077119,0.0009472749,0.011880289,0.006233041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009314737,0.00069756195,0.0008928703,0.008225297,0.018157467,0.017045038,0.0025436068,0.014438465,0.02980882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025316164,0.0009059134,0.0006213952,0.008520712,0.01602762,0.004170971,0.0035369615,0.012283285,0.0035428975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050278402,0.000096998105,0.0009116032,0.0002221889,0.000018974499,0.00015221137,0.0013120365,0.00029868577,0.00017009352,0.39488503,0.5449827,0.056899175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008386747,0.000010283451,0.001833456,0.00017261374,0.0000070439187,0.000015159205,0.00032087308,0.00005567081,0.00008828573,0.006216949,0.99125165,0.00001957852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7307466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86046803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9068116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.093188435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14578386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67613256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416401998","doi":"10.54660/ijsser.2022.1.5.22-40","title":"A Conceptual Framework for Ethical Practice and Credential Recognition of Foreign-Trained Lawyers in the United States","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Science Exceptional Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credential; Operationalization; Legal profession; Credentialing; Conceptual framework; Legal ethics; Certification; Accreditation","score_opus":0.2330441217818144,"score_gpt":0.555277754144536,"score_spread":0.3222336323627215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416401998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041659385,0.0025831456,0.3921855,0.076535575,0.0004637079,0.00096394017,0.00041112833,0.00018743098,0.48501012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78564423,0.0015086869,0.18722951,0.0049739974,0.00019249208,0.0018249003,0.00029741426,0.00004467347,0.018284133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924223,0.004704226,0.00035799912,0.0009014618,0.0009880172,0.00062607904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474806,0.002442065,0.00071716576,0.00036928715,0.0009389238,0.00078443886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008723012,0.00062114355,0.00034495955,0.0038732118,0.006059182,0.009915392,0.0024053336,0.0048561795,0.005887646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071154465,0.00045536322,0.0008390141,0.0024526967,0.023271205,0.0092966035,0.004869411,0.003909682,0.0006737781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.857906e-7,0.0000096789345,0.00014907832,0.000006572382,7.0347653e-7,0.000025517284,0.0017140304,0.00023945235,0.0000144068335,0.99594206,0.0005181324,0.0013795692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021393711,0.000032904623,0.0008552071,0.00028166795,0.000007331057,0.00019367175,0.007531714,0.004075998,0.00008590633,0.9089073,0.077980325,0.00002661924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02478496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021334646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02478496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013540503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02139764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09824371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416462446","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5763102","title":"&lt;p&gt;The Ethics We Learn Together: Teaching AI and Moral Formation in a Law School Classroom&lt;/p&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social engineering (security); Interpretation (philosophy); Order (exchange); Institution; Social order; Task (project management); Social practice; Metis","score_opus":0.03900245386203895,"score_gpt":0.3764222498004316,"score_spread":0.33741979593839266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416462446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049374454,0.0012523059,0.014644047,0.069531836,0.00070213736,0.00006249702,0.00012453411,0.00032949497,0.86397874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7191783,0.0012548086,0.015534533,0.0039194715,0.00022480589,0.00017125327,0.00010902007,0.00044587153,0.2591619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922895,0.00045152564,0.000016368089,0.000104645995,0.00011687405,0.00008166706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984366,0.00073474157,0.000068208785,0.00011240506,0.000122303,0.00052568916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001475662,0.00027902122,0.00025522144,0.00045989495,0.0046596103,0.005542185,0.0006188057,0.0019413428,0.038283452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003062568,0.00023099205,0.00021743825,0.00063314714,0.0058881682,0.005171115,0.0025689453,0.0037780236,0.007527893],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035109788,0.00043761605,0.0017346585,0.0001575949,0.0000066082553,0.00030322437,0.03156243,0.00067163614,0.0010830838,0.55415595,0.20431568,0.2055365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003719937,0.000049937073,0.00497993,0.00021536954,0.000008692952,0.00015798541,0.029412497,0.0029692142,0.0024055245,0.5222293,0.43751907,0.000015261277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009892841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01874354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038283452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003348577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048561613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12807083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416892521","doi":"10.1007/s11115-025-00965-3","title":"The Impact of Social Identity on Legal Attitudes: Insights from the U.S., India, and Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Organization Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collectivism; Legislation; Individualism; Identity (music); Social identity theory; Perception; Cultural identity","score_opus":0.01936521368011775,"score_gpt":0.3702774484286167,"score_spread":0.350912234748499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416892521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74133325,0.069799505,0.00017554124,0.07150411,0.00041599438,0.000078348035,0.0009776833,0.000012184893,0.115703486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96755916,0.026144944,0.000075699594,0.0032395339,0.00007449848,0.0000128234215,0.00017581237,0.000009451314,0.002708023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940216,0.0009974272,0.00014572703,0.00029242114,0.0029111214,0.0016316291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649765,0.011483686,0.003266505,0.0005576943,0.016560512,0.003155133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069834725,0.00017512315,0.0005175166,0.004571084,0.007166618,0.008057505,0.0015060259,0.0010218673,0.0030810942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023582488,0.00018465669,0.00034815638,0.010144637,0.0062570395,0.0016819022,0.0026123892,0.0023670143,0.00015158328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022263324,0.00025711168,0.37969473,0.0023929828,0.0003761911,0.0010174494,0.16555008,0.0007247802,0.0003941494,0.115245566,0.078262635,0.25586173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027620436,0.00006979361,0.7037458,0.0029799405,0.00029334513,0.00012236877,0.16996987,0.0002688984,0.00026668856,0.0028928898,0.119299605,0.00006323743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96174717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98506516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04942651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04942651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14209813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3586161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416988549","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2025.2585423","title":"Better law for a better world: new approaches to law practice and education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law Teacher","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Practice of law; Legal education; Legal practice; Legal profession; Black letter law","score_opus":0.12523694500336355,"score_gpt":0.4020189543921985,"score_spread":0.2767820093888349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416988549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004480003,0.027935673,0.023470912,0.17432505,0.0041313246,0.00008359321,0.000043419688,0.00019790579,0.7653321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32223177,0.056609645,0.032239195,0.036303297,0.005131421,0.00046701587,0.00014403675,0.00032078585,0.54655284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725586,0.001499688,0.00006847785,0.00016073685,0.00075614074,0.00025922136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678934,0.002050628,0.00019422216,0.00018309051,0.0002770684,0.00050553825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027971019,0.0004975871,0.000515834,0.0011230648,0.0046756137,0.014419384,0.0012518024,0.0041045714,0.015843347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00559827,0.0002809552,0.00046369652,0.0014833369,0.018013658,0.014084351,0.0046265065,0.008936704,0.0033979716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041681446,0.000030199499,0.00010686434,0.00012162127,0.0000025691002,0.000038435956,0.007954589,0.00015567172,0.00006902207,0.90691495,0.05365092,0.030950963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064024302,0.00002273806,0.0002897066,0.00041592692,0.0000037738441,0.000093864706,0.00874937,0.00042041094,0.000094963725,0.3387115,0.65118104,0.000010260329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038777734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009936812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015843347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007316327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008389861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053083897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416993015","doi":"10.65393/elwy7299","title":"PUBLIC LEGAL EDUCATION: A KEY TO JUSTICE FOR ALL","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Key (lock); Bridge (graph theory); Legal research; Legal profession; Public policy","score_opus":0.09832075091890358,"score_gpt":0.4556871435625759,"score_spread":0.3573663926436723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416993015","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032758545,0.03299262,0.005298573,0.834577,0.0026397523,0.000106541214,0.00006634203,0.00012867682,0.12091464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5159949,0.07286687,0.013484659,0.32883182,0.008168407,0.00033495395,0.0002513263,0.00021932811,0.0598477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835867,0.0077783465,0.0004984598,0.0010194879,0.0040606046,0.003056456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97246605,0.013444483,0.0018179207,0.0018517405,0.0040773177,0.006342502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013601433,0.00039199524,0.0009791263,0.0015465638,0.009057455,0.01235545,0.001924265,0.013732779,0.012825095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026575759,0.0004130097,0.0006761927,0.0016497461,0.021513093,0.016163409,0.014964915,0.022249913,0.0022631472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009825121,0.00013276543,0.00042102727,0.00071783335,0.000017735669,0.00017130961,0.0049552047,0.00021027599,0.00015474054,0.81049925,0.10915718,0.07355293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014871778,0.000049366667,0.0009446018,0.0023011884,0.000018481365,0.00025010735,0.005301364,0.00012039497,0.00024710016,0.29314354,0.69758135,0.0000276933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016193585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016743746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016193585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0082054315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055688947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07193214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417154677","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13759-6","title":"Perceptions of primary care patients attending a legal health clinic: a qualitative descriptive study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Health Services Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing research; Thematic analysis; Health administration; Qualitative research; Public health; Health informatics; Legal psychology; Perception; Descriptive research","score_opus":0.22541043466080962,"score_gpt":0.609553108233327,"score_spread":0.38414267357251736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417154677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99488753,0.00079649605,0.0003643053,0.0014359527,0.000034125427,0.00023330242,0.00024687417,0.000009034097,0.0019923924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99613464,0.0008883074,0.00036938352,0.0012821401,0.000020224366,0.00031506974,0.00010572493,0.000012375847,0.0008721588],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938378,0.0037463016,0.00030699122,0.00042275936,0.0005471484,0.0011390651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842343,0.01043436,0.0013027175,0.0002869478,0.0014434257,0.0022982736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009844742,0.00042282438,0.0011548722,0.0016733841,0.006816297,0.004732895,0.001780692,0.0021536485,0.003760466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019141007,0.0010629826,0.0005263541,0.002052038,0.004741222,0.0034827092,0.0039859163,0.003362019,0.0004604075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040080933,0.00011670276,0.01344528,0.0002552545,0.000007575357,0.0010696329,0.98166627,0.000018401914,0.00035301378,0.0003003328,0.0004837163,0.0022437742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043311547,0.0000993187,0.0052363146,0.00015130854,0.0000038383287,0.00032469805,0.9920305,0.00003372018,0.00005144078,0.000071380586,0.0019835546,0.000009599049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01581534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022587596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01581534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056112227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052886987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052064538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417172372","doi":"10.31273/wpqtm024","title":"&lt;b&gt;In the Seminar Space: Navigating Graduate Teaching in Undergraduate Legal &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;Education&lt;/b&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of PGR Pedagogic Practice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Warwick","keywords":"Dialogic; Foregrounding; Agency (philosophy); Transformative learning; Rigour; Identity (music); Negotiation; Reflective practice; Participatory action research","score_opus":0.06517370578867077,"score_gpt":0.43617647776491925,"score_spread":0.3710027719762485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417172372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87753683,0.001333869,0.0147226835,0.044791542,0.00056921726,0.00021730905,0.000028100609,0.00023632945,0.06056409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97319555,0.0004802192,0.0069220085,0.004456153,0.000082488536,0.00011411776,0.000025931477,0.00009840719,0.01462509],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922236,0.00551393,0.000089810026,0.00051724946,0.00045213377,0.0012032686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934464,0.0020437276,0.0003348339,0.00028151358,0.00026764916,0.003625913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010148215,0.0003357215,0.00031942644,0.0006552681,0.01313843,0.008132606,0.0024611051,0.0028770948,0.00604006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009027503,0.00039297686,0.00035025738,0.0005076223,0.017118476,0.0057826503,0.01875322,0.00578381,0.0013667796],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033942506,0.00030470078,0.005134613,0.00014966371,0.000004343402,0.0015541614,0.9004947,0.00022143766,0.0023446265,0.026353098,0.008343262,0.055061474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021190874,0.0002582217,0.002248772,0.00024030468,0.000006244697,0.00076103816,0.8300577,0.00040848606,0.00092745165,0.011824952,0.15322085,0.00002481129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002557694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007942228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01313843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045904154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010180959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053669512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417433484","doi":"10.3138/9781049805146","title":"Looking Forward by Looking Back","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Legal history; Legal education; Scholarship; Legal profession; Legal realism; Legal research; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.023872772871287598,"score_gpt":0.285494803317581,"score_spread":0.2616220304462934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417433484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054189535,0.061329175,0.0020378695,0.18673413,0.03645174,0.00006476336,0.0002856567,0.00041994342,0.70725775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045202866,0.024702344,0.0016109394,0.037266936,0.0052548703,0.000039477636,0.00017885215,0.0003721484,0.88537157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982436,0.00031823042,0.000038043938,0.00019989186,0.0009865627,0.00021375435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884653,0.0002483383,0.0000735959,0.000080751306,0.00051261124,0.00023815231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083247514,0.0007881682,0.00039463336,0.0016914407,0.008942594,0.014061736,0.0006992692,0.0022329395,0.02015174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004473079,0.00026308701,0.00039060108,0.0020145876,0.011471825,0.0071736416,0.0031112907,0.0046288413,0.00734704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016984322,0.000011638617,0.00030718025,0.00014614931,0.000004329509,0.00016474735,0.025789144,0.00007550204,0.00021035426,0.1651163,0.77057606,0.037581585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.048815e-7,0.0000034821392,0.00013027289,0.000074019634,0.0000016675825,0.00002487798,0.0037881143,0.000012233517,0.000037932543,0.0021624467,0.9937604,0.0000035617152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27674207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48507518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27674207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027617214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019401673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5502625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417491987","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v32i3.1798","title":"Sustaining Legal Clinics Through Summer: A Strategic Response to Rural Legal Advice Deserts in the Southwest of England","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rurality; Legal advice; Intervention (counseling); Population; Face (sociological concept); Legal service; Legislature; Rural area; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.08774606629170167,"score_gpt":0.5291681681221226,"score_spread":0.44142210183042097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417491987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98188514,0.00042766525,0.0007360493,0.008829704,0.00011403433,0.00021523461,0.000046911977,0.000035931636,0.0077093625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903713,0.00038801227,0.0015792592,0.0018528322,0.00002926479,0.00013365682,0.000026706697,0.00001924817,0.005599828],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970161,0.0015621525,0.00007187114,0.00018772458,0.00021849992,0.00094374863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99305177,0.0015714898,0.0008279294,0.00020558578,0.00060066883,0.0037425621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025782653,0.0002137958,0.00029135338,0.0004127322,0.010626721,0.0029379015,0.002196949,0.0016477455,0.0067061153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052718436,0.00045746635,0.00021517169,0.00049685244,0.0036218453,0.0017416882,0.0044130264,0.00187842,0.00046232168],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016632078,0.0007474624,0.07048311,0.0006579833,0.000018896924,0.02820574,0.8227747,0.0003397313,0.003882852,0.004942345,0.021153832,0.04662707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022215232,0.0004883904,0.029582117,0.00027545364,0.000008892286,0.0024053978,0.91187894,0.0002965437,0.00029399616,0.0006447285,0.05407086,0.00003247363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07855548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3200341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07855548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006976308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01318215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15619642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W44394366","doi":"","title":"Dealing with Sensitive Issues in Morality and Law.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.031817085643217696,"score_gpt":0.3423433413980397,"score_spread":0.31052625575482196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W44394366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011538128,0.062237628,0.019884536,0.436713,0.0039442675,0.00008888934,0.00004719756,0.000086089116,0.46546027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7417672,0.034674346,0.008273014,0.07653307,0.004542111,0.00021901567,0.00006448758,0.00013570231,0.13379097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781407,0.015801542,0.0004931668,0.0009668343,0.0032590665,0.001338788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856419,0.010996089,0.00073565723,0.00094080187,0.0010955085,0.00058995676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016649505,0.00058857683,0.00075048493,0.0016107007,0.007092247,0.010542428,0.0017622154,0.018694442,0.010475411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030503731,0.0003713936,0.0005747007,0.0012283811,0.04543884,0.011800753,0.0068868194,0.015581665,0.0013859979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006562068,0.000025469124,0.00015569564,0.00009776273,0.0000075241082,0.00016152157,0.009665459,0.00012203746,0.00011098812,0.9520809,0.024316166,0.013249923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011620499,0.000024045305,0.00054400676,0.000576341,0.000009727234,0.0002509737,0.008218492,0.00020082874,0.00028035333,0.76015925,0.22970991,0.000014507973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007551239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011847436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018694442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075359736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008228339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088052034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W46769426","doi":"10.32920/22341337","title":"The E-Team Project: A Teamwork Approach to Clinical Legal Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Notice; Legal education; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Passion; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.13923714968036857,"score_gpt":0.5193572630499719,"score_spread":0.3801201133696033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W46769426","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1293312,0.0015130355,0.43495527,0.07679772,0.0025694326,0.0036585496,0.00016971758,0.0016146504,0.34939042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64461005,0.0015722765,0.29063237,0.0059395437,0.00040500422,0.0022841434,0.00018489592,0.00027699923,0.054094654],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984184,0.012476765,0.00026657767,0.0007543607,0.0010468757,0.0012714393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840242,0.005609683,0.00057529606,0.0009909624,0.0008455087,0.007954285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011955221,0.0005640045,0.0002844206,0.0019607646,0.010034954,0.00787727,0.003367805,0.0027536335,0.012532497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010967633,0.00043061518,0.0005393246,0.00147131,0.013453123,0.0047500436,0.013529978,0.0038917142,0.0024021445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014503785,0.0029198688,0.007859279,0.0007039683,0.000053904205,0.0025781665,0.17235805,0.0035583852,0.0014449602,0.1625096,0.13652623,0.50934255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003593704,0.0012553326,0.007970348,0.0010804391,0.00002694361,0.0017415889,0.23638283,0.0052679195,0.0013531627,0.124532014,0.6199168,0.000113282134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008256283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027040252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012532497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004825282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023100147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063225985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W46835410","doi":"10.1007/978-1-137-29556-9","title":"Discourses of trust","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Public relations; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Law","score_opus":0.047358559975365117,"score_gpt":0.39918314834271756,"score_spread":0.3518245883673524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W46835410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0497304,0.0165076,0.020812368,0.09767564,0.0015102754,0.0001794314,0.0012153598,0.00027916924,0.8120897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747659,0.005040224,0.00294723,0.0017424239,0.00028365394,0.0001385958,0.00037170324,0.00014923085,0.014561087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824845,0.012559259,0.0008243683,0.0010507784,0.002144197,0.0009369286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97922015,0.013538363,0.0018275379,0.0021198394,0.002065686,0.0012283581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009485466,0.00073925237,0.0007150403,0.0049826573,0.011527487,0.016732601,0.0015060825,0.0033403423,0.01797529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035789497,0.00044734613,0.00065830146,0.007481767,0.023227068,0.02147244,0.008119381,0.0036001753,0.0022517755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025156744,0.00000878919,0.000797082,0.00016025719,0.000009222956,0.00019283828,0.1096964,0.00020281006,0.000060709415,0.86185247,0.016105792,0.010888478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009926585,0.000019038544,0.0013068452,0.0014513857,0.000015732772,0.00027748127,0.1409163,0.0007356295,0.00014047898,0.39772066,0.4573657,0.000040826777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010965099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048230067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01797529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016043518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066085123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116404414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W468432831","doi":"","title":"LibGuides. On The Web: Where to Find Canadian Case Law. British Columbia.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.04358089228278778,"score_gpt":0.3252407205573323,"score_spread":0.2816598282745445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W468432831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018513036,0.011468895,0.0005219247,0.016146831,0.000459405,0.00008808715,0.028894065,0.0021501328,0.9384193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015738424,0.007953169,0.0012365294,0.0037149128,0.000089038,0.000073700096,0.008618103,0.00090613123,0.96166986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907386,0.000054078242,0.000045589717,0.0000596234,0.0005443686,0.00022233737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995314,0.00084231904,0.00014583762,0.00019741825,0.0024601957,0.0010401519],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007921612,0.0006838419,0.00043036547,0.006599606,0.0080944,0.007359911,0.0016308452,0.0037821142,0.3466735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058871717,0.0006961039,0.0003779028,0.00884104,0.0019602748,0.004248204,0.0024361277,0.0024429695,0.09082063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053371455,0.0000074233453,0.00037785174,0.00007514995,0.0000011043925,0.000060541635,0.00026129666,0.000020910302,0.000034337743,0.003537686,0.9600339,0.035584543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048932416,0.0000022738225,0.0040140315,0.00030084842,0.0000045848797,0.000050921983,0.0011393214,0.00009184253,0.00010595809,0.00159606,0.99266934,0.000019813093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.965808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98945487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021597747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048999697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93189096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47619465","doi":"","title":"Is the Canadian legal profession at risk? An analysis of lawyer victimization across Canada.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal profession; Law; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.022044396612366426,"score_gpt":0.3057240661619168,"score_spread":0.2836796695495504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W47619465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96614,0.004987028,0.0002055837,0.009668343,0.00007718246,0.00014949715,0.0016029307,0.000015775362,0.017153623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99202394,0.00341972,0.00023716506,0.00071788806,0.000013974022,0.00004724124,0.0005969956,0.000011464096,0.0029316815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947009,0.00039394037,0.0001830882,0.00038033188,0.002349326,0.0019923234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913163,0.00077526754,0.0014847587,0.00018650175,0.0043012523,0.0019358367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002325314,0.00036735763,0.00087761163,0.0072926907,0.024773644,0.005743392,0.0027583174,0.0011269555,0.0037711633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010666127,0.00062126195,0.0005386116,0.01767338,0.0036893368,0.0017680353,0.004534037,0.0018856602,0.0002457141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007814277,0.00010948466,0.62907034,0.00043497008,0.00006915432,0.0013145886,0.28146052,0.0001655264,0.0004279399,0.007193525,0.016654974,0.06302076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003791945,0.00002059559,0.67024505,0.00028267063,0.000027628153,0.00023446827,0.30555183,0.00018159334,0.000080217505,0.00019364795,0.02313847,0.000040098024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99856865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.867709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13229102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1845016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95984304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W51903142","doi":"10.29173/alr334","title":"Will the Law Society of Alberta Celebrate its Bicentenary?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Power (physics); Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.058426339906465896,"score_gpt":0.35319823217245583,"score_spread":0.29477189226598993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W51903142","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034028,0.057561945,0.00078682386,0.65851194,0.007476844,0.000045188255,0.00022527827,0.00015896483,0.24120499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4525045,0.049155395,0.0029001392,0.16153993,0.0025034118,0.000044592718,0.00025819894,0.00010367881,0.3309902],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947125,0.00054529053,0.000079165125,0.0003662063,0.0025333636,0.0017634917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913504,0.0010614148,0.00031254772,0.00028956681,0.0043793665,0.0026066666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00488942,0.00032233846,0.0004098514,0.001497327,0.009979735,0.010303476,0.002078557,0.006363827,0.008239963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007583759,0.00023448275,0.00032443678,0.0019316383,0.008319589,0.0027255516,0.0026019325,0.0035238555,0.0010595401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070334005,0.00007921723,0.008772698,0.000423459,0.000048907754,0.00060279464,0.0063538295,0.000587599,0.0009512937,0.3432087,0.4541062,0.184795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105510035,0.000021468551,0.013391443,0.0001492833,0.000017175742,0.00007781251,0.0038351852,0.00009326394,0.00016793402,0.006604508,0.975609,0.000022467459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9378344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9729716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062165618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051797036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15708669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3758155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W5293378","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1192","title":"When Law Reform Is Not Enough: A Case Study on Social Change and the Role that Lawyers and Legal Clinics Ought to Play","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal College of Anaesthetists","keywords":"Grassroots; Law reform; Political science; Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Scholarship; Injustice; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Social movement; Politics","score_opus":0.14543805735670856,"score_gpt":0.44527065231704566,"score_spread":0.2998325949603371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W5293378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7845096,0.0019319665,0.003305298,0.13471715,0.0009013168,0.00047512757,0.00004492899,0.00006351279,0.07405113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695458,0.000964679,0.0013692207,0.014377618,0.0002278718,0.00024872422,0.00001789232,0.000057388643,0.01319075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96430147,0.026118293,0.00037350194,0.0011663173,0.0019210837,0.0061193616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764662,0.013835102,0.001342635,0.00060446816,0.001166763,0.006584938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014994204,0.0008095464,0.0009215127,0.0024745974,0.072140604,0.014039363,0.0042986614,0.014638577,0.0060527376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020729808,0.0010469176,0.0010019963,0.0026626075,0.03726959,0.010288437,0.017185228,0.017801763,0.0006190809],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026134,0.0005709731,0.0028015384,0.00008128052,0.00000800266,0.010298262,0.92312557,0.00011008208,0.0002609546,0.043955155,0.008967825,0.009794252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001561514,0.000075542615,0.0008453005,0.000099664634,0.0000055524356,0.0011830678,0.96001256,0.0001351417,0.00011026936,0.0024592832,0.035041645,0.000016387483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035555962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10357251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072140604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016861213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015433323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12233722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54712862","doi":"","title":"Information and information seeking of novice versus expert lawyers: how experts add value","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Review of Information Behaviour Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Psychology; Information seeking; Computer science; Information retrieval; Machine learning","score_opus":0.09843256750236813,"score_gpt":0.4607631064108265,"score_spread":0.3623305389084584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W54712862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6218365,0.27877694,0.0053203045,0.061332002,0.0007725535,0.00012561846,0.00026941107,0.000028633716,0.03153797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91628665,0.06992752,0.0028641329,0.007921053,0.0008109403,0.0000610723,0.00014470925,0.000024576875,0.001959387],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835296,0.010716195,0.00072439696,0.0012048145,0.0032176513,0.00060731644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6358366,0.34235266,0.007431368,0.003483633,0.008680546,0.0022152169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021680593,0.00027814816,0.001485433,0.0038119764,0.0011270886,0.00736065,0.001191599,0.0035233533,0.004219537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1396516,0.0004265066,0.0008261182,0.0034317365,0.003427167,0.011780029,0.0019775925,0.0030006676,0.0003041954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023270387,0.0012765976,0.22188015,0.00553675,0.0010206248,0.0005814366,0.02610773,0.000398482,0.0012096904,0.023553072,0.009074439,0.707034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005075819,0.00228216,0.7257133,0.013487975,0.0038131943,0.0020136563,0.06391586,0.0031635864,0.0023380609,0.13115239,0.051245645,0.00036654575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006775143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012837718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021680593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024922926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028192808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11465931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54969692","doi":"10.53300/001c.6741","title":"Turning gambling silver into tax gold?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revenue Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Publicity; Tax law; Tax avoidance; Accounts payable; Value-added tax; Indirect tax; Order (exchange); Economics; Advertising; Law and economics; Tax reform; Business; Public economics; Law; Marketing; Finance; Political science; Payment; Medicine","score_opus":0.04521173606552628,"score_gpt":0.38093202772146434,"score_spread":0.3357202916559381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W54969692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078553565,0.009153336,0.00567908,0.29462785,0.0034445752,0.000057624304,0.00002563641,0.00008186583,0.60837644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80860025,0.007051236,0.0025088675,0.055096477,0.0007828537,0.00003654698,0.000021863758,0.00007344421,0.12582847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961339,0.0012592821,0.00011154243,0.0003746747,0.0012810058,0.00083961344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769646,0.0011385778,0.00023637607,0.00012281333,0.00037094657,0.00043479697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039470955,0.00026720678,0.00039762305,0.0010402258,0.00782916,0.011076109,0.0011572576,0.0052460874,0.010954497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011009267,0.00032650333,0.00035243074,0.0006740003,0.019560598,0.010288524,0.004764554,0.0075500025,0.0021058125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016083492,0.000051054478,0.001344887,0.00009725661,0.0000045906236,0.0004513373,0.016472958,0.00014480569,0.00025256295,0.9066214,0.03268088,0.041862242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000127540425,0.000104832034,0.004206814,0.0013667517,0.000016768085,0.0007676572,0.043813083,0.00073886855,0.001022442,0.37859893,0.56929326,0.000057826812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023915462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039020352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023915462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060976255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006785968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047552526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55958263","doi":"","title":"Court Technology in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020550732950740266,"score_gpt":0.3451081907792258,"score_spread":0.3245574578284855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55958263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29446477,0.0063773156,0.0015763916,0.117841706,0.0012190167,0.00028170497,0.0030845893,0.00031160464,0.57484293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6085829,0.002980444,0.00119867,0.016033862,0.00014802707,0.00007441267,0.0006832396,0.00013364565,0.3701648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99119747,0.0005097268,0.00022489828,0.00083151326,0.0034004922,0.0038359675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875102,0.0019409035,0.00045327895,0.00038317408,0.0056682113,0.004044299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026443943,0.00033701432,0.0007768187,0.0033542167,0.027715394,0.011875257,0.0026278694,0.005827657,0.038924523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013148889,0.0008080278,0.0008953814,0.0046669208,0.0039658663,0.0026073288,0.0031091177,0.006354396,0.0017817052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024893443,0.00039403248,0.06365022,0.0003409176,0.0001342005,0.0022771512,0.010753544,0.0033986017,0.0010237785,0.53521824,0.2569612,0.1255993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012328157,0.00013180675,0.12371453,0.00041865077,0.00013410719,0.00041243047,0.016327513,0.0031454524,0.0008967467,0.014374724,0.84013116,0.00018961338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19518666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19518666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34662902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9334694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W560225930","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2758","title":"Law Reform for Dummies (3rd Edition)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Law reform; Law; Political science; Focus (optics); Sociology; Public law; Work (physics); Legal profession; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04183578923180889,"score_gpt":0.36268053715360815,"score_spread":0.3208447479217993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W560225930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021265235,0.096986994,0.0022657674,0.098800056,0.012277809,0.00018996348,0.003057764,0.00089732907,0.7833978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01583448,0.015407651,0.0019077209,0.019564552,0.0015196948,0.00011460929,0.0009905786,0.00018789586,0.9444729],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985531,0.000111298505,0.00007395986,0.00012366024,0.00088067004,0.00025736578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992167,0.00011153817,0.000045082477,0.000089662,0.00041923422,0.00011782543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015262921,0.000517464,0.00034433822,0.0020095864,0.0038622075,0.0053714216,0.0011640154,0.0063999323,0.043519147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029601073,0.00056840363,0.00065849593,0.0017484108,0.0021941669,0.0028482284,0.0018303511,0.0045225117,0.010561012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009062211,0.00002022077,0.00019537665,0.00010075656,0.0000034572217,0.00006810914,0.00055322517,0.000107638334,0.00016651537,0.08698415,0.87285244,0.038938887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034489165,0.000005251452,0.0008216208,0.000094056864,0.0000023388448,0.000025095025,0.0000901791,0.00002486739,0.00005236431,0.002727299,0.9961482,0.0000052877654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4633052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69259346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4633052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014772236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01991831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92121696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W562467954","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1124","title":"Book Notes: Negotiating Justice: Progressive Lawyering Low-Income Clients, and the Quest for Social Change, by Corey S. Shdaimah","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Social justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.037982797154296005,"score_gpt":0.3834031824197955,"score_spread":0.34542038526549945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W562467954","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078935194,0.060816173,0.001052814,0.85322005,0.008120065,0.000033901735,0.00008728272,0.00003885041,0.075841494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036905877,0.14774334,0.0039004723,0.33325037,0.022566788,0.00023540607,0.00013584021,0.00016916868,0.45509285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990639,0.0004429576,0.000035726756,0.0000927157,0.00028935072,0.00007533766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949904,0.004073785,0.000107236025,0.000065285974,0.0004306533,0.0003326444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002262148,0.0006797059,0.00041022178,0.0007636706,0.0063005183,0.006018753,0.0014726061,0.0073864455,0.012649235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005800354,0.00047881686,0.00027792866,0.0013000384,0.00803443,0.008995208,0.0016938541,0.009079141,0.002999448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040022724,0.000015501693,0.00009016736,0.000041747055,0.00000143977,0.000031821026,0.0010321008,0.000060569455,0.000027167554,0.03358515,0.95630544,0.008804916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020572881,0.000023111243,0.0011328146,0.00052906526,0.0000053927174,0.00012263414,0.0077402536,0.00022730544,0.00014391013,0.055616852,0.9344109,0.00002708787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041352212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1611608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041352212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030889031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006380314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08222306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W57287063","doi":"10.29173/alr336","title":"Who is Afraid of the Big Bad Social Constructionists? Or Shedding Light on the Unpardonable Whiteness of the Canadian Legal Profession","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alzheimer Society of Canada; The Scarborough Hospital; Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Diversity (politics); Statutory law; Equity (law); Political science; Law; Population; Order (exchange); Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.052848922560771984,"score_gpt":0.34758343962224064,"score_spread":0.29473451706146864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W57287063","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03137341,0.03745726,0.0007031051,0.7781408,0.0028141001,0.000021932332,0.000115495335,0.000046167104,0.1493277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74875927,0.044322446,0.0009140119,0.122538164,0.0025804674,0.000024703491,0.0001209811,0.0000892662,0.08065069],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920574,0.0014876537,0.000094924835,0.0005051124,0.0030040084,0.0028509665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918411,0.0017206729,0.00060516363,0.0002267955,0.003567484,0.0020389105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052106157,0.0004295484,0.0005756982,0.0026694187,0.025932834,0.011527318,0.0014149783,0.003251697,0.005997782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009430279,0.00025656525,0.00033254435,0.0029370037,0.039054655,0.0047213864,0.0026643162,0.0035498736,0.00068884925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043420554,0.000050998093,0.024214162,0.00037500585,0.00004374116,0.00041790822,0.060727578,0.00014613058,0.00037795157,0.34238464,0.42710063,0.14411801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000103826,0.000033276036,0.037026282,0.0007456252,0.00003809325,0.0001973712,0.15658402,0.00016251314,0.00020322592,0.034410696,0.7705198,0.00006881042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9474861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9801135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052513897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050989393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09079012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36995566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W57516122","doi":"10.29173/alr35","title":"Training Lawyers, Cultivating Citizens, and Re-Enchanting the Legal Professional","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Sociology; Legal profession; Citizenship; Law; Incentive; Meaning (existential); Public value; Rubric; Practice of law; Public service; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.07065397470094821,"score_gpt":0.3997925408408025,"score_spread":0.3291385661398543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W57516122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10104061,0.006592685,0.046426535,0.4287255,0.0014784216,0.00010900297,0.000029624189,0.00042533167,0.41517216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89149237,0.0028796978,0.016691832,0.03467502,0.00077302795,0.000078804864,0.000034872333,0.00016315687,0.0532112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99129546,0.0047425064,0.00016816698,0.00096039515,0.0016636931,0.0011696749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98943555,0.004040894,0.00086871797,0.0011801039,0.001226191,0.0032485402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008618346,0.00032060992,0.00034328803,0.0013272188,0.009952324,0.01162274,0.0010421184,0.005582432,0.0057813865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010845855,0.00037835556,0.00034688122,0.0008163467,0.03846933,0.013714094,0.009612716,0.009566417,0.0018455083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014080722,0.00018186506,0.002337492,0.000087992354,0.000005821075,0.000113448696,0.035998017,0.00020035247,0.00075114664,0.87736464,0.019897854,0.06304718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021476477,0.00010708847,0.0027227039,0.0004052167,0.000014695661,0.00020709298,0.02184682,0.0004641944,0.0012999758,0.48867917,0.4841907,0.000040798397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069162305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012468123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01162274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007157277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017318498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05192995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W57941468","doi":"","title":"Recent publications by law reform bodies worldwide","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law reform; Political science; Law; English law; Common law; Public administration","score_opus":0.023589136248758004,"score_gpt":0.35273743448617906,"score_spread":0.32914829823742103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W57941468","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040606532,0.52243906,0.0035272115,0.062792845,0.021807937,0.00046967115,0.03420586,0.0013305134,0.31282037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11387703,0.66381544,0.0094766645,0.012764595,0.025199387,0.000639983,0.03161382,0.0011569782,0.14145619],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98272955,0.002434403,0.0017739328,0.001369122,0.010468081,0.0012249292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87724507,0.044090077,0.025698178,0.005176698,0.043831337,0.0039585805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011095664,0.00064048206,0.00079396134,0.06265909,0.0015263822,0.008951578,0.00094584166,0.0013264309,0.038616758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051334858,0.0005577256,0.0006172086,0.13129844,0.0014375164,0.0071642916,0.0028399809,0.0015121736,0.011516175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013910669,0.000079959085,0.011861124,0.008238958,0.0000920097,0.00026563578,0.005069112,0.0001560178,0.0008932961,0.009291286,0.45155075,0.5123628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000085789425,0.000017949862,0.011895194,0.0037741645,0.00007505295,0.00022523158,0.0022629248,0.000057951314,0.00042736554,0.00064722035,0.98058987,0.000018475303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004467148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006450935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06265909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035540524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009905029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12918591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W587819908","doi":"","title":"Does recent empirical research shed new light on Australia's legal aid scheme?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scheme (mathematics); Empirical research; Political science; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2557447438557932,"score_gpt":0.4664951813377429,"score_spread":0.21075043748194972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W587819908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8476306,0.0038790386,0.000562932,0.046854552,0.0002971524,0.00013782945,0.0008390782,0.00002272262,0.09977604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639562,0.002610508,0.0005119363,0.0033958494,0.00005945062,0.000049897808,0.00016789677,0.000009670418,0.029238744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549085,0.00082609983,0.00022782531,0.00030559226,0.0017340013,0.0014156529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9632228,0.011334134,0.004942331,0.000897847,0.013198303,0.0064045982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004880109,0.0001355469,0.0004907973,0.0029576102,0.0048689763,0.0061621806,0.0012228027,0.0014337628,0.012949768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042641632,0.0002707777,0.00019731293,0.005196635,0.0030331279,0.0024581451,0.0019891209,0.0025812283,0.00041611056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002184222,0.00043947418,0.52551025,0.0010497911,0.00017975866,0.0009413629,0.032423932,0.001782608,0.00059634366,0.24976358,0.056004494,0.13109009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006120377,0.0001356264,0.81732035,0.00088785036,0.00012328639,0.0001823393,0.035148114,0.0016612239,0.00040778215,0.008673413,0.13532174,0.00007718921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8846007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9677463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8846007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037734844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06811981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27378672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W588353516","doi":"","title":"A simple common lawyer : essays in honour of Michael Taggert","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Honour; Law; Economic Justice; State (computer science); History; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0396921525145215,"score_gpt":0.35618298549205185,"score_spread":0.31649083297753033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W588353516","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019693482,0.15177508,0.0016832885,0.6118508,0.037658993,0.00006811219,0.00020733709,0.0000952136,0.19469188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07141106,0.073580585,0.0019463423,0.14990877,0.03894697,0.00021500561,0.0002700401,0.00035897837,0.6633623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973156,0.0010194408,0.00011709899,0.00043545058,0.00081772835,0.0002947287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99510586,0.002693167,0.00030520328,0.00026818752,0.0012234267,0.00040413858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029245536,0.0009373758,0.0008970756,0.0022366876,0.0069499537,0.0074172365,0.0017407731,0.0067339935,0.016029147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013961579,0.00046458046,0.0005581101,0.0032182352,0.009503459,0.009475557,0.0034790605,0.006371777,0.0073683816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075096254,0.000014923056,0.00007399072,0.00007582002,0.0000026422756,0.00008396329,0.0027440847,0.000050627874,0.00004179663,0.07353636,0.91235846,0.011009866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032112205,0.0000039091565,0.00020838159,0.00032125652,0.0000014390558,0.0000438522,0.0015660392,0.00004531197,0.000019487748,0.016329143,0.9814512,0.00000673918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02580777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027852038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02580777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009964501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059952955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07229781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W589388014","doi":"10.2307/25149395","title":"Gender in the Legal Profession: Fitting or Breaking the Mould","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07091684834777205,"score_gpt":0.3785065807837027,"score_spread":0.30758973243593063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W589388014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012711752,0.07566132,0.00555325,0.3245385,0.05760857,0.00014706588,0.0026377973,0.00016165926,0.5209801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3293947,0.084760256,0.00611144,0.040231485,0.071247466,0.00027141935,0.0024456773,0.00029231064,0.46524525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995358,0.00018409871,0.000023294251,0.0000543408,0.00013140727,0.000071158356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99546415,0.0024979978,0.0002658581,0.00015967901,0.0011323283,0.0004800951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013571364,0.00030145844,0.00032928327,0.0016361831,0.0022474763,0.0029943318,0.0007346446,0.001369718,0.066075034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060217315,0.00014926927,0.00020125961,0.001999357,0.0024600776,0.00418424,0.0011673755,0.0021900379,0.0066316104],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036037403,0.000024431707,0.0015507081,0.00020093651,0.0000028820316,0.000100374826,0.0025023066,0.000053704287,0.000093659524,0.12400469,0.8023634,0.06906694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005591116,0.000029181336,0.009589295,0.0019977745,0.000005596568,0.00012918765,0.01143843,0.00010242572,0.00010807021,0.06255796,0.91401577,0.000020747679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009884288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012934029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066075034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014701932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017638298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22104299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W591794062","doi":"","title":"The exchange university : corporatization of academic culture","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"UBC Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Politics; Corporatization; Social science; Commons; Scientism; Capitalism; Sociology; Political science; Economic history; Law; History","score_opus":0.08019788068095221,"score_gpt":0.3309623248504566,"score_spread":0.2507644441695044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W591794062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023538636,0.026272407,0.0013778766,0.021374656,0.0043846034,0.000031370197,0.0000838449,0.00006364899,0.9440577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16092092,0.034695055,0.0014331563,0.007691132,0.008006314,0.00019971147,0.00022576256,0.00026536628,0.78656274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990194,0.00041792548,0.000042614694,0.00009588819,0.00032878603,0.000095381176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980736,0.0009772662,0.00012683569,0.00025330644,0.00035783753,0.00021115516],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014090757,0.00035971813,0.0003626238,0.0018181881,0.004460871,0.0067440383,0.0006411588,0.0015178842,0.032140482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035729816,0.00023231484,0.00023565786,0.002680737,0.00615892,0.0071658175,0.0029680722,0.0036744864,0.0032725437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007921299,0.000018152812,0.00016645057,0.00007539532,0.0000012549856,0.000047075293,0.002605963,0.00007773293,0.000046384943,0.7438993,0.2109496,0.042104717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026422645,0.0000072457688,0.00076813775,0.00025034047,0.000001574987,0.00008350498,0.001986639,0.00009632083,0.000106077074,0.04574976,0.9509397,0.000008069575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065151774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007707866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061742766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00352801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10752064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W595612711","doi":"10.5860/choice.40-1198","title":"Consequences: the impact of law and its complexity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.3878402613515508,"score_gpt":0.5048767076401325,"score_spread":0.11703644628858167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W595612711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04503019,0.041722946,0.01449613,0.1632908,0.0016612915,0.00009883631,0.00012312112,0.000090497866,0.7334861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94450194,0.019415606,0.0019459925,0.008957569,0.0010264973,0.000082092534,0.000050798873,0.00007823693,0.023941133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191695,0.0038377235,0.0001653391,0.0004392969,0.0027780724,0.0008626766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899727,0.007299363,0.0006406747,0.0005543541,0.0011164797,0.00041634246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003471291,0.00052698265,0.0006555335,0.0027646297,0.0054718326,0.015155298,0.0012284905,0.0030642555,0.0042570746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012448557,0.0004057453,0.00051317643,0.0027255581,0.04092161,0.013070429,0.0051623285,0.005229737,0.0003905968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008984811,0.000013273372,0.001125698,0.00008670353,0.000009339553,0.00022339745,0.0035509649,0.0006285049,0.000096480915,0.9711828,0.0071914527,0.015882261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007467691,0.000023282173,0.004501372,0.0003380451,0.000017276434,0.00027488274,0.010963264,0.00071360037,0.00014310441,0.83415663,0.14883603,0.000025054018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022208953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023591153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022208953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011732708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008083224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085127175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W602559176","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737710.001.0001","title":"Anti-Bribery Laws in Common Law Jurisdictions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Legislation; Common law; Conflict of laws; Business; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Liability; Political science; Enforcement","score_opus":0.03397323711534432,"score_gpt":0.29383888692795923,"score_spread":0.2598656498126149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W602559176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037972387,0.007628321,0.0032562716,0.0041254973,0.0004957605,0.000036269492,0.000038606056,0.000057714795,0.9805643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21974705,0.01918687,0.0054782215,0.008745157,0.0010479166,0.00022363347,0.00019849783,0.00016608619,0.7452066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974868,0.00068245165,0.00009531328,0.00019004017,0.0012353249,0.00030989305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864084,0.0007561571,0.00011851237,0.00013809236,0.00029867204,0.000047615653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015708631,0.0003405207,0.00024996977,0.0010142564,0.0028400954,0.0048469757,0.00086572074,0.0023475774,0.009041975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003257883,0.0002816842,0.0003010256,0.001401218,0.006510719,0.0032875985,0.0017667884,0.0029964622,0.0023603847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015701847,0.000007654006,0.000054282307,0.000029432082,7.439215e-7,0.000038061946,0.0017525201,0.0001040858,0.0000571523,0.9628577,0.024402685,0.010694042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021620885,0.000009750917,0.00044793458,0.00027807662,0.0000030866108,0.00008488537,0.0007900752,0.00018619432,0.00016023988,0.08158706,0.9164427,0.000007750953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009703641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009618451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009703641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033277343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048332456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030248404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W603772582","doi":"","title":"Moralism: A Study of a Vice by Craig Taylor (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; History; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018672442620560763,"score_gpt":0.30080138098695075,"score_spread":0.28212893836638997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W603772582","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013792688,0.98073065,0.000020018837,0.018075256,0.0005158573,0.0000032622434,0.000012859183,5.6638277e-7,0.0005036471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0052381745,0.98416305,0.000059632577,0.009358079,0.00092703715,0.000016505526,0.000015313131,0.000003101542,0.0002190548],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99318635,0.0039848057,0.0005715735,0.00043990128,0.0014964568,0.00032093233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94038665,0.048439726,0.003733087,0.0005899193,0.0050674267,0.0017832342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011502635,0.00078531227,0.0020758377,0.005813634,0.0021361692,0.0048079747,0.0013061216,0.0049377275,0.0038284005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044478953,0.0006868859,0.0007912985,0.011785587,0.008730061,0.0060796593,0.0031353051,0.0065320604,0.00046673793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002279912,0.000052209587,0.0013507014,0.049926247,0.00056420726,0.00022039367,0.006664786,0.00026562024,0.00010529641,0.04737258,0.55165046,0.34159952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001290798,0.00010742012,0.008464886,0.08287203,0.00059400726,0.00071770215,0.0047548437,0.000054325996,0.00008820713,0.007972979,0.8941602,0.00008423866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08767353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18486466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08767353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013369721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029505651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17432648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W604368464","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1878671","title":"Text Work as Identity Work for Legal Writers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Identity (music); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.04710310200457926,"score_gpt":0.36564701374643915,"score_spread":0.3185439117418599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W604368464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1379217,0.0010246971,0.012991539,0.025515316,0.00063018117,0.00011868609,0.00006961284,0.00016599189,0.8215622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399467,0.00024950883,0.0038153264,0.00073324505,0.00015070119,0.00008213056,0.00004067898,0.00011147439,0.054870337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98493356,0.010067262,0.0003669242,0.0010674143,0.0019907532,0.0015741885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96392155,0.01806248,0.003570617,0.005385993,0.0032525244,0.005806909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011444587,0.0006044861,0.00060578116,0.0038685605,0.023176502,0.02910976,0.002505226,0.006941185,0.03859421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02601042,0.0004915801,0.00067355536,0.0024327044,0.03549068,0.020696,0.013443893,0.004724455,0.0048319567],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010622973,0.00035032234,0.004029731,0.00008796312,0.00000933524,0.0005084658,0.19932851,0.000117755604,0.00038403936,0.75724036,0.0066910107,0.031146217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010742482,0.00017399776,0.0027580692,0.00036635532,0.00002822263,0.0006249611,0.2393832,0.0008696666,0.0012715801,0.621265,0.13309169,0.000059825597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025540397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028095827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03859421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005256754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009131611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12911052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W611033512","doi":"","title":"Book Review (reviewing Stacy Steele & Kathryn Taylor, eds., Legal Education in Asia: Globalization, Change and Contexts (2010))","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06060888822639129,"score_gpt":0.3402191460374222,"score_spread":0.27961025781103094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W611033512","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018096663,0.93870664,0.0003518973,0.014724781,0.01933811,0.000028018118,0.00038856256,0.00006456947,0.026216472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014378503,0.8790796,0.00064161944,0.007959071,0.010387542,0.00005015693,0.0006285428,0.000060004168,0.09975562],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950457,0.000055183766,0.000035420082,0.000052150663,0.00031963433,0.000033017506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711007,0.000983824,0.00016108314,0.000041083975,0.001500081,0.00020390488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008051244,0.00092422747,0.0015091419,0.0039660395,0.00066926755,0.0023092863,0.0014015409,0.0015886273,0.0569176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037524053,0.0004464441,0.0006065522,0.006956318,0.0006228992,0.002816249,0.00080885785,0.0022617704,0.045962904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007373697,0.000007047219,0.00003516597,0.00086333626,0.0000065350764,0.000028863851,0.000026106247,0.00004525237,0.000047366262,0.00055468135,0.9243122,0.074066065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004486128,0.000009590278,0.0003120999,0.0011496635,0.000011274114,0.000186504,0.000042057814,0.000026013226,0.00003078448,0.00037137134,0.9978492,0.0000068568106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012923696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031975012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0569176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018290596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035475213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19040835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W611675250","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2607","title":"Thoughtful Practitioners and an Engaged Legal Community: The Impact of the Teaching of Procedure on the Legal Profession and on Civil Justice Reform","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legal profession; Vocational education; Law; Civil procedure; Legal education; Subject (documents); Political science; Law reform; Civil law (Civil law); Legal practice; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.05555797097368087,"score_gpt":0.3956649873373307,"score_spread":0.3401070163636498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W611675250","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25137103,0.0107032815,0.012040742,0.49200612,0.0013084143,0.00010729912,0.000011655148,0.0000744306,0.232377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967676,0.002063807,0.001663323,0.019767012,0.00036348958,0.00006258339,0.0000040051023,0.00003238799,0.008367327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95624155,0.035481967,0.00033485953,0.0010247219,0.003929601,0.0029873026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95729667,0.030519908,0.00267772,0.0012122182,0.0020019042,0.0062915897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019075567,0.00025568638,0.00033391739,0.0016128124,0.016577577,0.013763723,0.0014965094,0.007030269,0.004137208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031955376,0.00031689246,0.00036584854,0.0010678107,0.074295856,0.0074405475,0.012603076,0.010722626,0.00043166152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020132373,0.00010683228,0.00097054837,0.00009807511,0.000005138714,0.00034882527,0.2861427,0.000102734884,0.0002929809,0.6813996,0.0056685223,0.024843967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094141404,0.0001738484,0.005102314,0.000967786,0.000019580031,0.0004295329,0.3941904,0.00070623227,0.00043668193,0.3616995,0.23612744,0.000052547806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026985563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039339453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9843193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015680641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03690288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11377156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W613687798","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1496","title":"Poor Canadian Legal Education: So Near to Wall Street, So Far From God","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Globalization; Moral panic; Legal education; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Legal profession; Sociology","score_opus":0.020234439480748198,"score_gpt":0.3243462018788552,"score_spread":0.304111762398107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W613687798","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09588671,0.012438689,0.00029440774,0.7177906,0.001366457,0.0000486693,0.00080177287,0.00010534438,0.17126729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72468364,0.016881907,0.0008117514,0.13978964,0.0003920768,0.00006702067,0.00048015258,0.00014985049,0.116743974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944014,0.0005230817,0.00008782928,0.0003598897,0.0018083797,0.002819482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98961544,0.00057437184,0.00043466853,0.00023418663,0.0034529918,0.005688234],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034831977,0.00046399713,0.0006151546,0.002566321,0.057253625,0.010565732,0.0022897534,0.0046178102,0.020361323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011167526,0.00047317613,0.00037804656,0.00481384,0.015681753,0.0036834474,0.0062262146,0.006248808,0.0013655396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057777648,0.00007395634,0.023950357,0.00026811063,0.000034856064,0.0007813179,0.06406965,0.00020461307,0.00031367526,0.10118786,0.7209951,0.08806277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021766378,0.000023092207,0.053567905,0.00067829876,0.000044316683,0.00034502137,0.11494929,0.00011292803,0.00017366493,0.008840781,0.8211148,0.00012818909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99400455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9427464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12423533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2648521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90139467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W622776753","doi":"","title":"LibGuides. Justice Studies - Canadian Justice System. Additional Resources.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08005071127137192,"score_gpt":0.38872009319267714,"score_spread":0.3086693819213052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W622776753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021493428,0.012479719,0.00025677792,0.010514851,0.0013200581,0.00037720305,0.27873522,0.0010734432,0.6930933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026463103,0.016568866,0.0014533618,0.0020112877,0.00031288108,0.00039447454,0.08644236,0.0005488548,0.8658048],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986319,0.00010462257,0.00008180529,0.00007008811,0.00076129386,0.00035026678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325776,0.0006325278,0.00020795016,0.00017431914,0.004660411,0.0010670462],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012002256,0.0012870408,0.00071980973,0.009722735,0.004974194,0.0030454134,0.0025629008,0.0015829931,0.45186174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058274274,0.0006315567,0.000512635,0.019856421,0.0009007714,0.0020924062,0.0022161324,0.001542111,0.05594118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001825485,0.000013099038,0.00071399746,0.00037391103,0.00000297775,0.000032812946,0.00018289137,0.000038006994,0.00001990692,0.00242737,0.95994025,0.036236566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016305981,0.000005230601,0.011996278,0.00062131346,0.0000102400445,0.00003582033,0.0010663818,0.00010220585,0.00010717937,0.00074872555,0.98526645,0.000023806588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9874466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99313825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9613538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038646206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087136306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7818527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W624745527","doi":"","title":"Life Sketches of Eminent Lawyers: American, English and Canadian, to Which is Added Thoughts, Facts and Facetiæ ...","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science; Sociology; Genealogy; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031281224533744156,"score_gpt":0.33042545557480524,"score_spread":0.2991442310410611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W624745527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025991073,0.017773872,0.0053566014,0.014600381,0.0019463442,0.00007164364,0.0013208729,0.0003310624,0.9560001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042707883,0.011932395,0.0042514447,0.0015938844,0.00020567165,0.00005884016,0.0007592769,0.00022389625,0.9382667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998197,0.000049669372,0.000005413438,0.000017233428,0.000078865516,0.000029194243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970955,0.0000885207,0.000015735219,0.000017616223,0.00010428567,0.00006433738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027501653,0.00063641166,0.00013283682,0.001023293,0.004666919,0.0032480946,0.0007219745,0.0010371449,0.054322325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013491457,0.00031902865,0.00020219015,0.0013561351,0.0033673455,0.0025833505,0.00093592296,0.002543827,0.011001517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016989683,0.00001178892,0.00014877152,0.00006977105,0.0000017585226,0.00016396533,0.0101915505,0.0003040275,0.00016991684,0.23165993,0.71757656,0.039684925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.2322337e-7,0.0000011663749,0.00020549833,0.00004366092,5.7257637e-7,0.000058533627,0.0013931333,0.00003853419,0.000027947945,0.0038342967,0.99439263,0.000003224441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2814619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5757185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7185381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064484077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051307073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5596472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W638823170","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342059","title":"Current Demographics in Large Corporate Law Firms in South Africa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographics; Corporate law; Political science; Legal profession; Law; Race (biology); Accounting; Business; Sociology; Corporate governance; Gender studies; Demography; Finance","score_opus":0.20382228290913554,"score_gpt":0.4085684871761593,"score_spread":0.20474620426702375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W638823170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937437,0.0006915983,0.000056124936,0.0015112675,0.000011161515,0.000057663176,0.0005926157,0.000004706073,0.0033311357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945147,0.0020815684,0.00008280479,0.0006826101,0.00001666063,0.000081699094,0.0003790845,0.0000052344767,0.0021555484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994062,0.00009769943,0.00006459004,0.000091224254,0.0001231508,0.00021710778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764603,0.0002563287,0.0010281436,0.000039004117,0.00023276267,0.00079768786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007972266,0.00014790332,0.00023484165,0.0025692314,0.0020830303,0.0014482429,0.0004279169,0.0005117701,0.01051646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028013133,0.0003372242,0.00013441477,0.0027317058,0.00079503795,0.0020462195,0.0014207419,0.0005707861,0.001432169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051084633,0.00021181365,0.92730576,0.00020553681,0.000012993137,0.001254736,0.049792286,0.00005466612,0.0016656383,0.0010579264,0.004595454,0.013792201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027985598,0.00008454477,0.90380126,0.00018317068,0.0000038866165,0.0007858091,0.08542903,0.00005378628,0.000083281426,0.00014643915,0.0094100535,0.000015947044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02323803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040322784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02323803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012156189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014292437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04620552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W648694678","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1194","title":"The Role of Technology in the Provision of Poverty Law Services","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal service; Work (physics); Poverty; Legal research; Public relations; Legal profession; Realization (probability); Political science; Engineering ethics; Business; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.013646776839421062,"score_gpt":0.3646321301634562,"score_spread":0.35098535332403513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W648694678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60207105,0.006450869,0.008688926,0.039007213,0.00015622698,0.00023709366,0.00015917145,0.000099894714,0.34312946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917579,0.0015492322,0.0016949621,0.0010393498,0.00003522979,0.000056568286,0.0000139552685,0.000011906625,0.0038408865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986821,0.007855641,0.00039016997,0.0004199187,0.0021801204,0.002333231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97003996,0.021082435,0.0036025972,0.0009778223,0.0022996431,0.00199753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006033628,0.0001900973,0.00018208774,0.0036324004,0.010142411,0.008696404,0.0013210413,0.0020677377,0.007714445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0210739,0.00034488575,0.00040270688,0.0032963476,0.011192877,0.0071828915,0.0076998905,0.002206093,0.000568645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112512564,0.00059925806,0.07286151,0.0007774963,0.000058400987,0.0030023633,0.11488169,0.0024533053,0.002051322,0.5619075,0.009983398,0.23131128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006315212,0.0010485479,0.14818572,0.0039880397,0.00014693798,0.0039111427,0.23671399,0.0053557316,0.0034815313,0.08864853,0.5082063,0.00025048087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023118878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0338002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023118878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009497552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014683365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06890988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W648893246","doi":"","title":"From Litigation to Mediation: Using Advocacy Skills for Success in Mandatory or Court-Connected Mediation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Lawyer supported mediation; Party-directed mediation; Political science; Law; Transformative mediation; Dispute resolution; Settlement (finance); Public relations; Business; Dispute mechanism","score_opus":0.021180906275249167,"score_gpt":0.3670503617553391,"score_spread":0.34586945548008996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W648893246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48633808,0.0038858978,0.0122413365,0.14401916,0.0011705486,0.0006411109,0.00006440664,0.0004573335,0.35118216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96922314,0.0011188531,0.009819688,0.006426129,0.00016226168,0.0003589307,0.00004802176,0.000121019955,0.012721899],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775389,0.012540719,0.00055541017,0.0010558837,0.0048409076,0.0034681768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96060103,0.02084724,0.0030449398,0.0016593572,0.003345319,0.010502163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01975016,0.0005265875,0.00050139526,0.003025573,0.011774168,0.014035522,0.003267218,0.004977121,0.014630533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06277652,0.00043406553,0.0006217933,0.0015541413,0.011616678,0.01237261,0.013740188,0.0072895954,0.0023469264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022463436,0.0024504117,0.039348256,0.0005029863,0.00004851445,0.0015270817,0.2810445,0.00022059018,0.0017698063,0.0889629,0.031473838,0.55242646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003046334,0.0012828433,0.076913066,0.0035568923,0.0001642925,0.0027209625,0.4993647,0.002772111,0.0037972815,0.1751248,0.23370408,0.00029440256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106522795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024386242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01975016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068607684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026135854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10445011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W651096436","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1372","title":"Book Review: The Great Juristic Bazaar: Jurists' Texts and Lawyers' Stories, by William Twining","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bazaar; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017977954878623893,"score_gpt":0.3320692991919636,"score_spread":0.3140913443133397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W651096436","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011954534,0.84908223,0.00012502247,0.10814696,0.03186129,0.000014973045,0.00014539741,0.000025697744,0.0104789715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037978794,0.7459729,0.0003361609,0.087392434,0.06581134,0.00011121036,0.00038016262,0.00013128537,0.09606666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873835,0.0003718558,0.00009855148,0.00013755496,0.0005578568,0.00009580309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99322116,0.0042003216,0.00034090533,0.00013930316,0.0017218245,0.00037656983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019077257,0.00094652636,0.0014401233,0.00521476,0.0021534406,0.005800989,0.0017673714,0.0059623886,0.01853058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01188058,0.0008747281,0.00043061763,0.008928375,0.0028180142,0.004899446,0.0018524606,0.0063005867,0.007952942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034123264,0.0000028153504,0.000013687798,0.00018447926,0.0000026473056,0.000009056154,0.00005420278,0.00001001629,0.00001079924,0.00087606633,0.9904703,0.008362481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006836569,0.0000045491706,0.00020781413,0.0009463883,0.0000071934173,0.00006452232,0.00010598187,0.000012188477,0.000015972724,0.0011772367,0.9974457,0.000005619089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021647623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079503186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021647623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047657364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071591916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061990976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W651638839","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511807039","title":"Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":706,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Identification (biology); Politics; Computer science; Management science; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.05129526871474356,"score_gpt":0.33859178021581804,"score_spread":0.2872965115010745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W651638839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00066264503,0.055690154,0.062957376,0.020370822,0.0040050857,0.00039762174,0.0001806621,0.00033707154,0.8553985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.075878605,0.11927715,0.18867849,0.013832987,0.007907703,0.002123827,0.0007228773,0.00063868205,0.5909397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946595,0.0022784323,0.0003495729,0.00041515578,0.002000549,0.0002968117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472237,0.003697472,0.00021189918,0.00039376484,0.0007594773,0.00021500613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00456127,0.0012067741,0.00080009276,0.0030076583,0.002958129,0.010121613,0.0019506735,0.004422,0.02304029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009535659,0.00062447204,0.00066576415,0.0023830372,0.010989151,0.0082858605,0.002878697,0.0054199733,0.011725339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054100065,0.000014840187,0.00004663226,0.0003177408,0.000005643647,0.000082212726,0.0019481033,0.0003212599,0.00010047557,0.87563765,0.067685604,0.053834338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004113585,0.000006159042,0.000059754355,0.0005758392,0.0000018249483,0.00014058441,0.00032120687,0.00017928077,0.000060738028,0.3890125,0.6096297,0.000008347096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016620378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017242031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02304029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00496797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004334232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07707745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W66244103","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1196","title":"Multi-disciplinary Practice in a Community Law Environment: Clinical Legal Education Combined with Holistic Service Provision","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Leasehold estate; Service (business); Bankruptcy; Legal education; Service-learning; Practice of law; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Legal research; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Political science; Legal profession; Engineering; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.09218450673027834,"score_gpt":0.473167992219119,"score_spread":0.38098348548884065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W66244103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7651685,0.0068715676,0.017920662,0.051976744,0.0012573916,0.0018947257,0.000037856946,0.0004299301,0.15444264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94012135,0.0043054163,0.03888503,0.004489413,0.00037270258,0.00070543797,0.000049994545,0.000053903837,0.011016689],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967451,0.0019346181,0.00006522266,0.00023747818,0.0003715278,0.0006460278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929784,0.00065996044,0.00022470282,0.00022038126,0.0002197024,0.0056969025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036691553,0.0003483616,0.00036401805,0.0010142323,0.0042160423,0.0031169488,0.0016425898,0.0020341673,0.008708214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005430743,0.00039916646,0.00031473997,0.0008709166,0.0030211492,0.002165007,0.01164545,0.002945349,0.0013479982],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017586793,0.0139025245,0.016929146,0.0011425946,0.000036087044,0.0047689453,0.065173686,0.0010883558,0.0026128674,0.011901921,0.039536357,0.84273165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019493466,0.013178855,0.17946844,0.007965722,0.000117075186,0.038241245,0.290597,0.0056083207,0.0037254137,0.06512295,0.39363587,0.00038974872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022436194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01645201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008708214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020079643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017136322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02913189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912120298","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.15429150","title":"The Urge to Enlarge the Nigerian Law School Curriculum: Queries From Without, Answers From Within","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Legal research; Legal education; International Legal English Certificate; Legal profession; Legal opinion; Curriculum development; Empirical legal studies","score_opus":0.0338395146311163,"score_gpt":0.30165011490603716,"score_spread":0.2678106002749209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912120298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008892744,0.17355384,0.0024084311,0.32627845,0.026287511,0.00010172524,0.00008836298,0.00013041851,0.46225858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.088326566,0.123261385,0.009439185,0.050807685,0.0056810672,0.00014866445,0.00020029194,0.00020206526,0.7219332],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995453,0.00015386277,0.000022894863,0.00004331038,0.00015735431,0.000077267076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932015,0.00025695038,0.0000385859,0.000027544822,0.0002154576,0.00014131094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009776871,0.00039933433,0.00030626496,0.000792444,0.0041124574,0.0054296595,0.00030568652,0.0016196396,0.011233613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015726568,0.0002713077,0.00016002679,0.00088066165,0.0019691498,0.007450171,0.001754871,0.004096971,0.0026666361],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000128404035,0.000063581494,0.00050384266,0.00039406185,0.0000016933378,0.00016752291,0.010384221,0.00012911238,0.0005970238,0.23676369,0.54966784,0.20131458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001273164,0.000006875063,0.00028229956,0.00030949264,9.939042e-7,0.000056189878,0.0026287553,0.000037015234,0.000050346334,0.004899842,0.99172395,0.0000029308687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01046314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03878394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011233613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044937353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006183919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037580132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6922378326","doi":"10.11575/prism/34148","title":"Professional Ethics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Professional ethics; Government (linguistics); Legal ethics; Professional association; Legislation; Power (physics); Professional responsibility; Professional conduct","score_opus":0.040172444518802065,"score_gpt":0.3386182772292818,"score_spread":0.2984458327104797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6922378326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016185673,0.0073266663,0.016443564,0.0983748,0.004308953,0.00032194256,0.00015466195,0.0001569843,0.87129384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1662548,0.014734401,0.030112397,0.11321167,0.007707694,0.0010058625,0.0004475952,0.0004023732,0.66612333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9546757,0.020821955,0.0028922318,0.0035628194,0.013794659,0.004252575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97013927,0.0092608845,0.0017962309,0.0040119276,0.010771503,0.0040202136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02044448,0.0009692329,0.0009218942,0.0020399983,0.011409946,0.012927907,0.0021302304,0.00998777,0.023868179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037594486,0.00064268184,0.0008203396,0.0017126618,0.021028688,0.0055436995,0.008153977,0.010077949,0.022284336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000103593875,0.00003557219,0.0002828096,0.00015673245,0.0000059811155,0.00012893602,0.0036559755,0.000119109485,0.00010546258,0.82247543,0.14669216,0.026331449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068236036,0.000012209159,0.00017226026,0.00044931183,0.0000027785795,0.00026476124,0.0008959269,0.00012391384,0.0000865525,0.12876646,0.86920863,0.000010523297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038679778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048766043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023868179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009239008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025376266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10812205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6923236722","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0089682.s001","title":"Figure S1 - Diversity of Rumen Bacteria in Canadian Cervids","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rarefaction (ecology); Rumen; Bacteria; Diversity (politics); Similarity (geometry)","score_opus":0.10096207676329193,"score_gpt":0.36021474487848815,"score_spread":0.2592526681151962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6923236722","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089438744,0.000566788,0.0012360488,0.00032084738,0.00010216618,0.00011752191,0.8915396,0.00053575914,0.016142586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2974497,0.0014057776,0.013765768,0.00043093905,0.000054489417,0.00030073395,0.65589476,0.00074426614,0.029953515],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995572,0.00001732972,0.000018869307,0.00012904892,0.00016107534,0.000116466304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882644,0.00027599052,0.000112840076,0.000058401318,0.0005993664,0.00012688294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040233618,0.00067665527,0.0004342973,0.004145956,0.0022767044,0.000919346,0.000856537,0.0004821971,0.11585686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019548547,0.00035420313,0.0007220119,0.0055575515,0.00044018455,0.00044399867,0.00069483795,0.0005010443,0.012463332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021357671,0.00014349578,0.29648677,0.005052779,0.0005119592,0.00066319644,0.0040275105,0.0038366527,0.10063024,0.003216568,0.43692523,0.14636983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055828183,0.00007137095,0.8477137,0.00042765375,0.00019433562,0.0002831652,0.0026415847,0.0011800654,0.0056658215,0.00044437984,0.14124292,0.00007917241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7183212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8359768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2816788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003597725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061534736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5666753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6949455787","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.14289158","title":"ETHICAL STANDARDS AND JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE: ENSURING INTEGRITY IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"GRi Simulations (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical standards; Legal ethics; Ethical code; Confidentiality; Legislation; Legal profession","score_opus":0.07109451823664936,"score_gpt":0.403155308760693,"score_spread":0.33206079052404364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6949455787","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018322498,0.011046123,0.07152406,0.65655863,0.0034151452,0.00018588365,0.00010600638,0.00011390615,0.23872776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8820571,0.005712383,0.036999293,0.052736923,0.0037317649,0.00044605145,0.000118123695,0.00027384213,0.01792447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.838832,0.108104154,0.0071572093,0.0074847597,0.029989962,0.0084318295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65960926,0.24772492,0.01645478,0.02704053,0.035554968,0.013615553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14149664,0.0006237039,0.00144583,0.0025173954,0.012282383,0.024983693,0.0036409944,0.019462243,0.0056423605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21226117,0.0009821717,0.0009878809,0.002174365,0.08567525,0.01658463,0.013104345,0.025013933,0.0017566679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021258873,0.000051179355,0.0005881326,0.00010479982,0.000018550489,0.000088306624,0.0066832644,0.00024824875,0.00015902835,0.95968187,0.014143641,0.01821172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029807197,0.000016828142,0.0006929201,0.00050800503,0.0000149718,0.000101688194,0.003101077,0.00042182728,0.00035718613,0.94065964,0.054057665,0.000038392813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076293615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007574606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14149664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008204158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056050774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74831474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958168697","doi":"10.60770/p4tf-d018","title":"Tangible change or deaf ears?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MRU-Repo","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Law enforcement; Curriculum; Enforcement","score_opus":0.2766588934111086,"score_gpt":0.5076964657687175,"score_spread":0.2310375723576089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958168697","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06230084,0.021848116,0.008017018,0.57270634,0.006753092,0.00020048901,0.00015949689,0.00031441217,0.32770014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85548556,0.011796329,0.0049499637,0.092729546,0.0007475341,0.00015123164,0.00006882342,0.00015656976,0.033914454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98417515,0.007531901,0.00039634248,0.0010954848,0.0036580435,0.0031431084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859796,0.006029037,0.0011697244,0.0010549012,0.002258192,0.003508546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013974786,0.00051295833,0.0005243711,0.001949379,0.010934976,0.013318524,0.0020329964,0.004517114,0.023832876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035684638,0.00027043791,0.00067582,0.0013030979,0.038510997,0.017535448,0.015536725,0.008890209,0.0021353827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006171543,0.00027376224,0.006520609,0.0011955128,0.0000483771,0.0011012489,0.15385531,0.00017756263,0.0006073481,0.43630284,0.070542485,0.3293132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027296883,0.00009151497,0.0037044396,0.0027252105,0.000045981436,0.0005372446,0.28266898,0.00012389701,0.0007235845,0.14578572,0.5634936,0.00007257929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048750296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09976637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048750296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013795442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033564672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100093424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958846389","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7287496","title":"Multi-trait association mapping for phosphorous efficiency reveals flexible root architectures in sorghum","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Sorghum; Root system; Lateral root; Hydroponics; Quantitative trait locus; Crop; Panicle; Genetic architecture; Crop yield; Plant breeding","score_opus":0.04440901511104436,"score_gpt":0.3345188956694798,"score_spread":0.29010988055843545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958846389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99849916,0.000064787324,0.0010237766,0.000005876339,0.0000017482854,0.0000024770611,0.0002804978,0.000012693618,0.00010905313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904555,0.000016537508,0.0005638825,0.000005617811,7.619451e-7,0.000003545272,0.00019025692,0.0000059460417,0.00016787248],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998411,0.000026624195,0.00001674424,0.00007635685,0.00001867677,0.00002054574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997516,0.000094028626,0.00006579944,0.00002960588,0.00002767077,0.000031323918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021449184,0.00017280143,0.00020796656,0.0007097583,0.00018508892,0.00022875627,0.0001398766,0.00017527399,0.0009836068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022196237,0.00012934771,0.00027368878,0.000568912,0.00013582027,0.00006235051,0.0002602326,0.00016396362,0.00012974051],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059194386,0.00005275797,0.18153237,0.0001092691,0.00025697288,0.0005147642,0.0003363223,0.0006935665,0.80502033,0.0002752901,0.00013407378,0.0104823345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001590339,0.00006977999,0.98770195,0.000008005074,0.00009453575,0.00041970296,0.00009344008,0.0017687505,0.009150386,0.00012660239,0.00054013793,0.000010714394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015606842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030027155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015606842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106127685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011732711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0032904744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6966810344","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1311.0292","title":"Runaway greenhouse effect on exomoons due to irradiation from hot, young giant planets","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Planet; Jupiter (rocket family); Circumstellar habitable zone; Hot Jupiter; Giant planet; Gas giant; Transit (satellite); Spitzer Space Telescope; Icy moon","score_opus":0.07652943981642095,"score_gpt":0.2472442988783948,"score_spread":0.17071485906197387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6966810344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974444,0.00005607179,0.00077840884,0.000008460586,0.000002261918,0.0000023703615,0.000091993286,0.00005447985,0.0015616221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993445,0.000032554144,0.00018445622,0.0000028026018,8.512206e-7,0.0000022255035,0.000109181165,0.000016090176,0.00030719303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999746,0.0000036024578,0.0000012646323,0.000007071603,0.000004911716,0.000008465078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999866,0.00007180742,0.000024370234,0.00001437183,0.000010905749,0.0000126168525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000841954,0.00018840776,0.00009458303,0.00027742062,0.00013777544,0.00021168604,0.00013694595,0.00014636679,0.0016664673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041574158,0.000115614326,0.00032026318,0.00018067012,0.00017190068,0.00017902096,0.0002633194,0.00013975543,0.00009952244],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008619557,0.0000841017,0.6209427,0.00014110225,0.00017486827,0.0014684835,0.00052678667,0.2102342,0.14178805,0.001679492,0.0005193033,0.021578902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024941586,0.0002864711,0.8383802,0.000014325711,0.000100674515,0.00059538987,0.00023439247,0.11503269,0.042696733,0.0007997724,0.0018109742,0.000023461553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033055975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032196501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033055975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030744923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008707624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006572664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6968491336","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.15429151","title":"The Urge to Enlarge the Nigerian Law School Curriculum: Queries From Without, Answers From Within","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Legal research; Legal education; International Legal English Certificate; Legal profession; Legal opinion; Curriculum development; Empirical legal studies","score_opus":0.0338395146311163,"score_gpt":0.30165011490603716,"score_spread":0.2678106002749209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6968491336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008892744,0.17355384,0.0024084311,0.32627845,0.026287511,0.00010172524,0.00008836298,0.00013041851,0.46225858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.088326566,0.123261385,0.009439185,0.050807685,0.0056810672,0.00014866445,0.00020029194,0.00020206526,0.7219332],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995453,0.00015386277,0.000022894863,0.00004331038,0.00015735431,0.000077267076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932015,0.00025695038,0.0000385859,0.000027544822,0.0002154576,0.00014131094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009776871,0.00039933433,0.00030626496,0.000792444,0.0041124574,0.0054296595,0.00030568652,0.0016196396,0.011233613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015726568,0.0002713077,0.00016002679,0.00088066165,0.0019691498,0.007450171,0.001754871,0.004096971,0.0026666361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000128404035,0.000063581494,0.00050384266,0.00039406185,0.0000016933378,0.00016752291,0.010384221,0.00012911238,0.0005970238,0.23676369,0.54966784,0.20131458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001273164,0.000006875063,0.00028229956,0.00030949264,9.939042e-7,0.000056189878,0.0026287553,0.000037015234,0.000050346334,0.004899842,0.99172395,0.0000029308687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01046314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03878394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011233613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044937353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006183919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037580132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977022258","doi":"10.60770/b8hn-9j13","title":"Understanding mental health, burnout, and substance abuse among legal professionals in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MRU-Repo","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Substance abuse; Intervention (counseling); Mental health; Exploratory research; Legal profession; Substance use; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.08178621083139342,"score_gpt":0.37911701725494906,"score_spread":0.29733080642355564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977022258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92877823,0.012392054,0.0004343634,0.03530365,0.0001331096,0.00015751806,0.00061982253,0.000018351726,0.022162983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98281854,0.011612132,0.0005747704,0.002569944,0.000021554513,0.00006831978,0.0002252869,0.000007105146,0.0021023806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967384,0.00039057757,0.00012679219,0.00020279815,0.0012657623,0.0012756825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922616,0.0014023321,0.0008894688,0.00008335701,0.002961152,0.0024020378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038762926,0.00019123172,0.0004900388,0.002967879,0.0147622125,0.0046801143,0.0012651953,0.00080822565,0.0020762999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010390893,0.00036117423,0.0004093924,0.005529619,0.0034589993,0.001746564,0.0034799648,0.0018732955,0.00010701249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054097043,0.00028281318,0.5118271,0.0014645851,0.00008479089,0.000862726,0.33440757,0.0003194558,0.0006723647,0.009681213,0.018269747,0.1220735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010383691,0.00004967425,0.6092304,0.0022742727,0.00006182957,0.000178839,0.3566776,0.0004041191,0.00019158209,0.0010999867,0.029765518,0.000055829176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8797507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.120249264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32186267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87247354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980321423","doi":"","title":"Bridges between theory and practice: Experiences of students articling in Prince Edward Island","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IslandScholar (University of Prince Edward Island)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Practice theory; Grounded theory; Practice of law; Norm (philosophy); Process (computing)","score_opus":0.018661395963503417,"score_gpt":0.3285082265739747,"score_spread":0.3098468306104713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980321423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98221004,0.00042993316,0.0009092602,0.0042961063,0.00009952693,0.00009838711,0.000016201064,0.00003795596,0.011902656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98123026,0.0006271616,0.0014393008,0.0018443097,0.000032379976,0.00010115303,0.000029954834,0.00006172532,0.014633789],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98988974,0.005519615,0.0002545727,0.00059547747,0.0013557563,0.0023848128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987282,0.004080782,0.0006708962,0.0005558062,0.001495301,0.005915358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008485997,0.0010524332,0.001543146,0.0017307246,0.03403936,0.011275602,0.003967464,0.006611687,0.0048048045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014184483,0.0012754344,0.0008795693,0.0014485546,0.022775223,0.0061847134,0.020756721,0.014491058,0.0011948546],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001352802,0.000114001086,0.0008948356,0.00002822613,0.0000028399302,0.0007406879,0.994068,0.000020219572,0.0002962247,0.00083583506,0.00051815517,0.0024673305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041671974,0.00009902248,0.0008625869,0.00005900808,0.000005201258,0.0003110707,0.9856903,0.000085384294,0.00023098984,0.00034341877,0.0122858435,0.000022975873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04015851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07139457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9598415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007122406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008679218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07984954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980647520","doi":"","title":"Combatting complex inequality: the importance of an intersectional approach to Manitoba's human rights complaint process","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Commission; Intersectionality; Human rights; Process (computing); Work (physics); Foundation (evidence)","score_opus":0.07219488665857852,"score_gpt":0.34905899745287594,"score_spread":0.2768641107942974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980647520","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14804475,0.006141226,0.021637607,0.635597,0.0018766933,0.0008298126,0.00011376074,0.00024549596,0.1855136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8647245,0.0019446411,0.021307262,0.06708894,0.0003330363,0.0006264276,0.00006685131,0.00012983427,0.04377853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9613384,0.017975729,0.0012358108,0.002089772,0.006418341,0.010941924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95366746,0.018579355,0.002886206,0.0024000264,0.010443704,0.012023227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036995575,0.0004711456,0.0008960207,0.0035836245,0.056454036,0.033690486,0.0063300375,0.0085113635,0.010735548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04270433,0.0010641488,0.0007857288,0.00417982,0.031929385,0.01255843,0.029514888,0.013106516,0.000793258],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009489418,0.00033576094,0.045840964,0.0005204056,0.00010672466,0.0023611716,0.25842437,0.0012604512,0.0010370536,0.5287191,0.054774504,0.10652462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056095098,0.00015125885,0.04216772,0.0021340412,0.00006752584,0.000651555,0.3779437,0.0031823665,0.00075641944,0.10316348,0.46943295,0.00029297057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68261725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84309185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31738275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.094648644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23241828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68672717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982557482","doi":"","title":"Integrative Reflective Practice in Canada and Australia: Enhancing Legal Education, Pedagogy, and Professionalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective practice; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Reflection (computer programming); Legal education; Professional development; Legal profession; Legal practice; Professional learning community; Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.02048834854508113,"score_gpt":0.3541579098201325,"score_spread":0.3336695612750514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982557482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.788189,0.008224395,0.006364203,0.06980239,0.0009641526,0.0008421767,0.000078296405,0.00017600301,0.12535939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96560436,0.0033423165,0.008997649,0.0035124114,0.000038306396,0.00020258171,0.0000446494,0.000037173646,0.018220466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793123,0.007499497,0.00061025977,0.001378155,0.0076571205,0.0035427464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664531,0.0059659607,0.0017539975,0.0010240577,0.009729629,0.015073317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015171833,0.00043472563,0.00064398965,0.002857534,0.03495398,0.010778882,0.0027719697,0.0026512698,0.0026305118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035201143,0.0006028977,0.0004552165,0.0039844494,0.012078238,0.004128875,0.012915219,0.004004637,0.00023604016],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001307421,0.00050907675,0.03322296,0.0007354061,0.00004195952,0.0015621069,0.59295905,0.00060603546,0.0014579251,0.050164066,0.017405974,0.30120465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072642586,0.00045590708,0.13716064,0.0016816042,0.000090570255,0.001053221,0.54790026,0.0022525827,0.001885319,0.009808243,0.29739732,0.0002417587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9675051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86413795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13586205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4391362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9857528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982746002","doi":"","title":"Job Announcement - Visiting Assistant Professor of Lawyering Skills.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Position (finance); Curriculum; Work (physics); Legal education; People skills; Job market; Teamwork","score_opus":0.0381873241476378,"score_gpt":0.3258125774624519,"score_spread":0.2876252533148141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982746002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016074313,0.008294206,0.0018773422,0.10150457,0.038103733,0.0008358385,0.010464036,0.0021855552,0.82066035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015933942,0.0012734858,0.0006716644,0.006789971,0.0008549804,0.000116864794,0.0008995709,0.00010236791,0.97335726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927217,0.00007360872,0.000032259155,0.00018128123,0.00018607783,0.00025462633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949687,0.00010062534,0.00012262962,0.000060278293,0.0008114414,0.0039363913],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076211087,0.0005497356,0.0004953345,0.0007541792,0.0037118364,0.0023977035,0.00086514757,0.0018248153,0.5352866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015332331,0.0005745706,0.00029021592,0.00042454875,0.00059487927,0.0013103941,0.0016553286,0.002340679,0.21470311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023781593,0.00009134379,0.0011329898,0.00009391417,0.000002021632,0.00007007232,0.00017361419,0.000016570624,0.00037067127,0.0007211531,0.9617936,0.035510212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020638221,0.00009483682,0.007245067,0.00011906392,0.0000037441068,0.00021194127,0.001197329,0.00009034595,0.0003224976,0.0002654653,0.99041754,0.000011539108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011275728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074654326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4647134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032650337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009191275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66285723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983230797","doi":"","title":"Of Lodestars and Lawyers: Incorporating the Duty of Loyalty into the Model Code of Conduct","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Duty; Duty of loyalty; Jurisprudence; Loyalty; Ethical code","score_opus":0.05637354981150868,"score_gpt":0.35049593128195006,"score_spread":0.2941223814704414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983230797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19520791,0.002084731,0.05108573,0.25373954,0.0011505185,0.00019971021,0.000060856444,0.00010092542,0.4963701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708829,0.00021937388,0.0047136173,0.0154660605,0.00008841791,0.00005599331,0.000013592911,0.000022872562,0.0085371705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96770847,0.016457161,0.0009872639,0.002237403,0.007962024,0.004647696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785216,0.010732375,0.0014539347,0.0030684515,0.003954232,0.0022693696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017378418,0.00027753756,0.00042268494,0.001215073,0.015994702,0.01787724,0.002355788,0.012067836,0.001342819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043187972,0.000603376,0.0005533759,0.00097576686,0.052973617,0.010254161,0.008476619,0.012126034,0.0002625155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011106623,0.000012747925,0.0008836638,0.000007638924,0.0000032026785,0.00006713435,0.008680954,0.000154937,0.00006724828,0.9828713,0.002788687,0.0044513736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006976159,0.00007441673,0.0049335235,0.00043940076,0.000056226876,0.0003928956,0.030553512,0.0057420232,0.0007985086,0.8151028,0.14166771,0.00016913496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3424174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49013284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3424174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025159577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0624521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6808486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983453633","doi":"","title":"Measuring Impacts of Legal Services – A Literature Review on Research Design and Methodology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Research design; Legal research; Systematic review; Research methodology","score_opus":0.2850530236677583,"score_gpt":0.4569394633959341,"score_spread":0.1718864397281758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983453633","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000820553,0.9882631,0.0031279416,0.0029460036,0.00042466976,0.002505467,0.00025927785,0.000018789084,0.0016342752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073270807,0.973342,0.011564625,0.0023564927,0.00030203274,0.004693676,0.0002093956,0.00002089674,0.000183819],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.88887167,0.067128524,0.025149416,0.0042143655,0.013355001,0.0012810911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6343859,0.3087803,0.019516759,0.006106,0.029690929,0.0015201754],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12127181,0.0017443042,0.008028591,0.03180143,0.0026726222,0.009649589,0.0045024343,0.005038668,0.0051207743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22838524,0.0028689587,0.0037857397,0.02855997,0.0049851285,0.008290124,0.0036951327,0.0039065136,0.0017057225],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021117779,0.0003130552,0.0014885935,0.5338129,0.00092269195,0.00030311994,0.001546242,0.00056734675,0.0005263205,0.011695871,0.007851256,0.44076136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096323325,0.0004264991,0.002934235,0.901882,0.0020779038,0.0003916716,0.0019409134,0.00027663854,0.0004617597,0.006303143,0.08312191,0.00008705747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009973565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023376307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8787282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013221628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05126884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6413543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986339106","doi":"","title":"Parkdale Community Legal Services marks million-dollar milestone in helping ‘precarious’ workers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Milestone; Dismissal; Poverty; Work (physics); Shire; Social work; Legal service; Social Welfare","score_opus":0.02386109615865695,"score_gpt":0.31761262940946594,"score_spread":0.293751533250809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986339106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010557337,0.0034243632,0.00050929835,0.12216512,0.016520694,0.00042830754,0.0020447688,0.00072722096,0.84362304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016756374,0.0018887668,0.0008202864,0.0075946874,0.00063639914,0.00009700176,0.00079926505,0.00013428846,0.971273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868494,0.000088566696,0.000028854429,0.00011109928,0.0005642243,0.00052243116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99522346,0.00006892093,0.00008659589,0.00007923179,0.0008727803,0.0036689169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096203235,0.00052118796,0.00025501932,0.0005560322,0.0087840725,0.0039964803,0.0010094759,0.0026505927,0.24035344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022976014,0.0005269691,0.00024974966,0.00034148266,0.0016976884,0.0016577707,0.0049718204,0.0034994076,0.05052602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008970108,0.000026265885,0.00033069978,0.000018775141,6.9496554e-7,0.000046508114,0.00021291638,0.000008503118,0.00009903561,0.00055099075,0.98677665,0.011920086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006146924,0.000020225674,0.0026966035,0.0000780451,0.0000010828383,0.000051742576,0.001144648,0.000014748982,0.00007169509,0.00012504384,0.995783,0.0000069917323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4274498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8437113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5725502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008978497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024857366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8499235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987277830","doi":"","title":"Someone Out There Helping – Final Report Of The WellCoMs Mobile Van Project","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Service provider; Mobile service; Rural area; Service delivery framework","score_opus":0.044061780121788574,"score_gpt":0.3520172822294507,"score_spread":0.30795550210766215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987277830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5344292,0.003042766,0.0068493714,0.112619646,0.0017865369,0.016458921,0.007308661,0.000599029,0.31690595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60556936,0.0045276345,0.017194718,0.027556013,0.00029029662,0.009066533,0.01005821,0.00044351298,0.32529372],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914813,0.0025974899,0.00019181451,0.00048803783,0.0029190273,0.0023223395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890549,0.001299848,0.0003018232,0.00041164557,0.00402148,0.004910265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010623759,0.00041611984,0.0002751579,0.0009621841,0.008457223,0.005686567,0.002521279,0.003225491,0.019091567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009949101,0.00061310246,0.00041115846,0.0007029618,0.0017407857,0.0019182347,0.0056538577,0.004054563,0.0027365608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036581527,0.00743743,0.067624286,0.0013853178,0.00007237401,0.0048622573,0.06184388,0.0008575714,0.004173666,0.037394956,0.54462445,0.26935798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019678063,0.0013577754,0.082017064,0.0010329889,0.00003732195,0.0007586002,0.15574485,0.00066406786,0.002920326,0.0033605054,0.75182337,0.00008641721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.118101105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2702367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118101105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007542792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05165397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2348274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987299726","doi":"","title":"Special Tribute: The SMU Law School and 50 Years of International Legal Education 1947-1997","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Dalhousie University; Mylan; Fordham University; Louisiana State University; Universidad de Buenos Aires; University of Miami; University of Cambridge; Yale University; Northwestern University; McKnight Foundation","keywords":"Legal education; Work (physics); International Legal English Certificate; Legislation; Legal research","score_opus":0.03571970142476256,"score_gpt":0.3526365078817119,"score_spread":0.31691680645694936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987299726","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01867222,0.012231859,0.00024776618,0.6154038,0.18600361,0.00017410357,0.0014591741,0.00026570345,0.16554187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042190753,0.002164612,0.0001764271,0.085066535,0.0185244,0.00025331374,0.0005812161,0.00017677607,0.8508659],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996829,0.00032739446,0.00017122772,0.00035325837,0.0008353129,0.0014838052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99360645,0.0008260134,0.00030259858,0.00026810847,0.0013664282,0.0036303662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003270838,0.00106085,0.0012856636,0.0019575274,0.024335543,0.010793773,0.0022764825,0.014205563,0.079984315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009839323,0.0006752824,0.0009691844,0.0015671052,0.0037861627,0.005439541,0.009134661,0.016310403,0.017846942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025946776,0.00006179759,0.00091626355,0.00003480914,0.000003608974,0.00017493234,0.001254712,0.000013818735,0.000059706705,0.00808074,0.9785081,0.0108656455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018069997,0.00005017142,0.008407643,0.00022510672,0.0000058615697,0.00009736953,0.005040173,0.00003807562,0.0000969238,0.00078809843,0.9852116,0.000020870326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078332834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22431028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079984315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009068645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021640176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2675742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987693795","doi":"","title":"UGA SCHOOL OF LAW ENROLLS ITS LARGEST EVER FEMALE AND MINORITY CLASSES","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); White (mutation); Institution; Class (philosophy); Test (biology); Higher education; Legal education; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.07117879822801575,"score_gpt":0.3794148116118387,"score_spread":0.30823601338382295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987693795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016014071,0.0022689325,0.0005801898,0.04516411,0.0049186917,0.0007324131,0.008573374,0.005817337,0.91593087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019951226,0.0011799927,0.0006735766,0.01238447,0.000982747,0.00029905504,0.0024931903,0.00057934725,0.9614564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834204,0.00012878318,0.00004483892,0.00022316769,0.000728221,0.0005329542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971455,0.00008984604,0.00011574061,0.00016544551,0.00073777005,0.0017456738],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010860479,0.0010954614,0.0006787909,0.001693655,0.008799582,0.0049317614,0.0015605994,0.003839991,0.33903584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023758262,0.0007013672,0.0005210097,0.0011395041,0.0010605105,0.0014974617,0.0040742997,0.002873349,0.27190825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009933295,0.00007852988,0.0012887653,0.0000128224865,0.0000013274021,0.00008574341,0.00007473248,0.0000057516095,0.00014539379,0.00031457067,0.9812858,0.016696624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011840986,0.0000359663,0.011211866,0.000049376235,0.000004029031,0.00007026591,0.00040034685,0.00003240755,0.00015120082,0.000114271556,0.9879078,0.000010669168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059479218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19383283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33903584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003989776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071227336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94278514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987801986","doi":"","title":"UGA LAW STUDENTS AWARDED PRESTIGIOUS JUDICIAL CLERKSHIPS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Atlanta; Work (physics); Newspaper; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.06007416994264152,"score_gpt":0.4109810804647804,"score_spread":0.35090691052213885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987801986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07294962,0.004506333,0.00048933347,0.04505896,0.027824365,0.0008344126,0.0074490514,0.003824732,0.8370632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04103779,0.001129085,0.0002953209,0.007333551,0.0027366169,0.00027020404,0.0023735585,0.0004441038,0.94437975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622345,0.0002755132,0.00013437161,0.00032449022,0.0011776991,0.0018645434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910563,0.0001708659,0.0003891752,0.0004557028,0.0017668009,0.006161089],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021919652,0.0015684807,0.0011325054,0.0030493233,0.011876958,0.010451683,0.0014018033,0.0049419748,0.33038923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057211122,0.0009780467,0.00089451513,0.0021638987,0.0011060017,0.0018870861,0.007579784,0.004623767,0.20336826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022144715,0.00021465411,0.0018500477,0.000032201813,0.0000032118255,0.00023857929,0.00017758492,0.000016213568,0.0002343104,0.0005912919,0.97791356,0.0187063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025210784,0.00012700865,0.02908625,0.00008756216,0.0000068189674,0.00028348964,0.0011536628,0.000086688655,0.0003560541,0.00025738482,0.9684932,0.000036684552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014316896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06555658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33038923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003309461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007267527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9551185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987961813","doi":"","title":"Visiting Professor David Lepofsky '79 and Mark Persaud '91 are LSUC Honorary LLD Recipients","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pound (networking); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.0460766793066734,"score_gpt":0.37359330524487505,"score_spread":0.32751662593820163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987961813","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040593278,0.013469929,0.0010773707,0.60104626,0.06393936,0.00013988209,0.0007196702,0.00050162396,0.3150466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012097597,0.0020688782,0.00041457667,0.016977044,0.0020582376,0.000024981484,0.000109826644,0.00010687016,0.966142],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714965,0.0002534316,0.00007311836,0.00026378362,0.0013724522,0.0008876087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847365,0.0007774754,0.0002895488,0.0003174563,0.004336641,0.009542363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030601332,0.00044066276,0.0006832148,0.0013810976,0.010560768,0.0061078,0.0009675394,0.0043545295,0.12994094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008446154,0.0004450618,0.00044645305,0.00080179854,0.0026291783,0.0018453073,0.00419427,0.0072313673,0.042774767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008249305,0.000012560372,0.00035185087,0.000012948604,0.0000010754686,0.00006688055,0.00017113077,0.000009088448,0.00007936636,0.004244686,0.983164,0.011878123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018350225,0.0000064330843,0.00043385368,0.000019480742,9.891852e-7,0.00007731965,0.0004947573,0.000018223622,0.0000773935,0.00036607872,0.9984976,0.0000059576028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08449316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2870039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91550684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013971651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018687664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43469578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6988034388","doi":"","title":"What, Like It's Hard?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Work (physics); Character (mathematics); Redress; Common law","score_opus":0.04109574585300888,"score_gpt":0.3434040252076554,"score_spread":0.3023082793546465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6988034388","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02539193,0.0062120925,0.0026274633,0.7422777,0.019595927,0.00014448348,0.0003442059,0.00043065165,0.20297551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24520338,0.009159549,0.004776669,0.3281017,0.0043409355,0.00021575726,0.00054481503,0.000677915,0.40697932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944478,0.0017812122,0.00014614548,0.0005079185,0.0017467295,0.0013702408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892251,0.0008523717,0.0006458081,0.00037556197,0.0026801429,0.0062210322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037734788,0.00077192305,0.00071285316,0.0008761491,0.016925026,0.0119503215,0.0014974087,0.0045765806,0.027930371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016988153,0.00040474185,0.0007141573,0.00072278024,0.012685466,0.010877536,0.005508078,0.010877161,0.013966667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002966652,0.00012219523,0.0059716334,0.00017976924,0.00002894397,0.0008310289,0.044406988,0.000043536613,0.0005207667,0.011297461,0.88384116,0.052726943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016865555,0.00007818422,0.0056293905,0.0004806587,0.000020300311,0.0010413334,0.1673573,0.000081701255,0.00024325935,0.011441835,0.813528,0.0000810977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04087928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08955441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04087928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011042428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09343642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989997908","doi":"","title":"Class of 2014 - School of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Demotion; Subpoena; Circumstantial evidence; TSG101; Pretext","score_opus":0.07479472745692795,"score_gpt":0.3003057275988413,"score_spread":0.22551100014191333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989997908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13507971,0.0026180902,0.0021253258,0.032871947,0.013031777,0.001833334,0.030794159,0.0024596932,0.779186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07917213,0.0012759934,0.001361416,0.0046932697,0.0014816924,0.00061308604,0.007790606,0.00037504392,0.90323687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998007,0.00007580967,0.00009789145,0.00032973968,0.0006234132,0.00086615153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968741,0.00004158562,0.00015334171,0.00009594361,0.00071606116,0.002118946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013581546,0.0011745482,0.0010884606,0.002727748,0.007819372,0.004932096,0.002410403,0.0014979594,0.2609789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017630283,0.0005511304,0.0006519187,0.0011061656,0.0006948062,0.003041867,0.007042236,0.0027930483,0.11738271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015693539,0.0011609389,0.0370082,0.00019443894,0.000011652203,0.00042978098,0.0015189378,0.000060248618,0.0016481068,0.008965789,0.79683983,0.15200515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010557159,0.00024911202,0.042288315,0.00012203608,0.000004604184,0.00021175704,0.0021258034,0.00009396948,0.00062155334,0.00079557044,0.95346314,0.0000135757255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046027075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016965901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2609789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023064788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054313284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8730614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990174883","doi":"","title":"Curriculum of the law school and curriculumm of the law society examinations, Osgoode Hall, Toronto.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Work (physics); Foundation (evidence); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.007594659714024624,"score_gpt":0.23165231114704005,"score_spread":0.22405765143301543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990174883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1056061,0.011713796,0.0040360405,0.0793323,0.005245085,0.0017623162,0.046084464,0.00186151,0.7443585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0777117,0.0021123877,0.0023033165,0.0009282787,0.00024442884,0.00025400872,0.0042256117,0.00019493066,0.9120253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992632,0.00008208214,0.000035850688,0.0001063648,0.00025920267,0.00025324462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953869,0.0001869382,0.00011807508,0.000114537936,0.0011890036,0.0030045668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012768047,0.0004841616,0.00033084527,0.0018935924,0.0040190755,0.00213795,0.001147071,0.0015119108,0.15067318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033561892,0.0008566975,0.00025740912,0.001440353,0.0010316574,0.0008049123,0.0012904721,0.0012368854,0.016392896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012351369,0.00020281227,0.010497948,0.00032086193,0.000005884562,0.00029037858,0.0036018242,0.0004954311,0.0021816145,0.0052097803,0.8596127,0.11745722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028291797,0.00008338006,0.18930791,0.00022490897,0.0000055163614,0.00014007172,0.0016828695,0.00037655543,0.00061409635,0.00052437733,0.8069891,0.00002292193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6530316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92394483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6530316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024490349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050399113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69802356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990225150","doi":"","title":"Deanne Sowter: The Future of Harm Exception and Coercive Control","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Control (management); Work (physics); Do no harm","score_opus":0.01798536796244918,"score_gpt":0.3106686172155435,"score_spread":0.2926832492530943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990225150","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056114903,0.037083607,0.00049830205,0.92049205,0.023469785,0.000008680812,0.000008003763,0.000015181172,0.017863272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.088155344,0.08715895,0.0021274025,0.5514023,0.1291481,0.00012775899,0.00002561269,0.000087463384,0.14176704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931678,0.0031489308,0.0002685622,0.0006802968,0.002370045,0.00036440502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837159,0.011151011,0.0006875021,0.00036872862,0.0024350067,0.001641834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007138959,0.00047862792,0.0006134728,0.00083802454,0.0059154136,0.009374311,0.0017602812,0.009932146,0.0040554204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019163482,0.0003870927,0.00037971998,0.000583633,0.015967766,0.008997232,0.0028722985,0.013948653,0.0010811388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010266671,0.000018298795,0.00014316782,0.0001395255,0.0000033680572,0.00010302594,0.0033242898,0.00007177063,0.000031614498,0.1585521,0.81713647,0.020465989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008107755,0.000011709746,0.00027663913,0.00048398454,0.0000041657527,0.00010578445,0.0022687416,0.00012668205,0.00006992652,0.054812048,0.9418164,0.000015821315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007901017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015488428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009932146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048850444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011546149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037754834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990551016","doi":"","title":"Don't Go to Lawyers for Moral Guidance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Disposition; Moral character; Character (mathematics); Moral authority; Good moral character; Aside","score_opus":0.06308300082928,"score_gpt":0.38046062902860617,"score_spread":0.31737762819932613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990551016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054075415,0.0043339264,0.0026374923,0.67419815,0.006578471,0.000057535097,0.0001072273,0.00041574598,0.3062639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17464636,0.0023146116,0.0024977084,0.340539,0.0019225412,0.0001299765,0.00013140695,0.0005785387,0.4772399],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929133,0.0022346673,0.00013079583,0.0008957015,0.002543037,0.0012825041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845504,0.0023970408,0.0012906229,0.0010904709,0.0044094087,0.0062620444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034837103,0.00056049245,0.00061366695,0.0007583628,0.01322749,0.012342928,0.0018525196,0.008714741,0.05663892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026042175,0.0004480127,0.0004547724,0.00039791915,0.014560168,0.013213025,0.0052155172,0.022265686,0.035270877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020842526,0.00008285782,0.000810834,0.00009535622,0.000012691689,0.0001883029,0.00785882,0.000030511415,0.00030613676,0.11399139,0.8496233,0.026978852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013727389,0.000017639535,0.00043044522,0.00015527225,0.000004695546,0.00015377825,0.0063150907,0.00005883328,0.0001266859,0.020575771,0.97212887,0.000019242943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01603263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028023537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05663892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059116236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064696507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18947607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990768626","doi":"","title":"Enduring Hierachies in American Legal Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University at Buffalo; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Hamline University; University of Toronto; University of Louisville; St. Thomas University; Louisiana State University; University of Oklahoma; University of Memphis; University of South Dakota; University of Denver; University of the Pacific; Santa Clara University; University of Oregon; University of South Carolina; St. John's University; University of Cincinnati; Pennsylvania State University; Drexel University; University of Akron; University of Wyoming; Ohio State University; University of St. Thomas; Syracuse University; University of Pittsburgh; University of Pennsylvania; George Washington University; University of La Verne; Tulane University; State University of New York; Case Western Reserve University; University of Minnesota; University of Washington; University of Dayton; Villanova University; Harvard University; George Mason University; York University; Northwestern University; University of Missouri; Yeshiva University; Texas Tech University; Marquette University; Emory University; Valparaiso University; Baylor University; University of Montana; Florida State University; Yale University","keywords":"Categorization; Hierarchy; Legal education; Ranking (information retrieval); Empirical legal studies; Legal profession; Legal research; Legal opinion","score_opus":0.01688064246569535,"score_gpt":0.33141952992036133,"score_spread":0.31453888745466596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990768626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79601663,0.0019065309,0.001789934,0.041788407,0.00020659031,0.00002990182,0.00018063276,0.00005771096,0.15802372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910608,0.00026981317,0.00042420052,0.001102584,0.000050221824,0.000009661727,0.000040327668,0.000010177468,0.0070322747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959408,0.001198718,0.00015933979,0.00051704014,0.0010662514,0.001117907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950324,0.0011584355,0.00097175664,0.0003025287,0.0011851449,0.0013498133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035330767,0.000085541884,0.00013653602,0.003612028,0.011390948,0.005225514,0.0004785613,0.0008873825,0.0060441205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054178988,0.00023391313,0.00012855779,0.004611382,0.01043392,0.002953402,0.0052700057,0.0027398122,0.00032717575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006123725,0.0001644927,0.08088768,0.000093798524,0.00001311826,0.00018367401,0.13632123,0.0002688443,0.0010247782,0.6753557,0.013980286,0.091645256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032699794,0.0001573514,0.47296092,0.00023109677,0.000014336117,0.00015021376,0.15809816,0.0006634484,0.00070938887,0.077837884,0.28907418,0.000070293754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08136175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22511391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08136175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012179266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010645608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1617763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990954803","doi":"","title":"Everyday Legal Problems and the Cost of Justice in Canada: Gender (Data Report)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sample (material); Legal action; Everyday life; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.08525038480529805,"score_gpt":0.35585363994447056,"score_spread":0.2706032551391725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990954803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84004426,0.0028244015,0.00015028827,0.0035401648,0.00009406953,0.00020237043,0.13140714,0.000041588886,0.0216958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95670307,0.0029072464,0.0003384578,0.00045082517,0.000038254777,0.00013237081,0.029415844,0.000020604102,0.009993355],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873894,0.00007092216,0.00007882002,0.000090424066,0.000522932,0.000498013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957247,0.00020271944,0.0008144506,0.00008694734,0.0019976653,0.0011735372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007525492,0.0003095563,0.0004168444,0.0026845376,0.003007221,0.0019521716,0.0012447787,0.0005547078,0.005751534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004132078,0.00034067448,0.00093905185,0.0076952497,0.0005863212,0.0007993055,0.001325538,0.0010450154,0.0004768569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006608171,0.00006725338,0.962287,0.00007246935,0.00005860582,0.000091521484,0.0018468341,0.00013891277,0.000028532684,0.00044043723,0.022259211,0.012643016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070177143,0.000010334287,0.99195224,0.000053390937,0.000018439418,0.000046787685,0.0021284297,0.000098753364,0.000021621194,0.000042990887,0.0056070047,0.000012954327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99615896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02765058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02765058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030654186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20061994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991122825","doi":"","title":"Five Osgoode alumni – Sue-Lynn Noel ’01, Jessica Clogg ’97, Lorne MacLean ’82, John Struthers ’83 and Peter Sankoff ’05 LLM – made this year’s Canadian Lawyer Top 25 list","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice","score_opus":0.027549567000737497,"score_gpt":0.29779814920064057,"score_spread":0.27024858219990305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991122825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1999145,0.0050499425,0.0032145462,0.15320161,0.027473971,0.0008080786,0.0029948354,0.00079945603,0.60654306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.110931665,0.0012930892,0.0021971187,0.009080894,0.00073587906,0.00010373668,0.0011390536,0.00016617325,0.87435246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782723,0.00012551005,0.000054755827,0.0000854477,0.0008192905,0.0010877856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839864,0.00039368644,0.00021291043,0.00022831719,0.006414288,0.008764321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028756012,0.00050685764,0.00044004907,0.0033699244,0.012766541,0.0035301687,0.0007066901,0.0013274463,0.07284373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066453833,0.00042958936,0.00037700575,0.0012903085,0.0015226078,0.0011551166,0.0022566852,0.0028250176,0.01477586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012377494,0.00022554563,0.025435787,0.00009294189,0.000014130681,0.0002418826,0.0022544158,0.00007752732,0.0006454862,0.004691224,0.8511692,0.11502797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023487106,0.000090163485,0.04266801,0.00015114209,0.000012325385,0.000074790936,0.008991962,0.00016966497,0.0007073697,0.0005097637,0.94655776,0.000043448705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3531846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87186587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6468154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075409864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02685343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7022577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995245904","doi":"","title":"In Brief","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Gray (unit); Graduation (instrument); Legal education; Higher education; Schedule; Commission","score_opus":0.04606120803671844,"score_gpt":0.4277609520632667,"score_spread":0.38169974402654827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995245904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032575635,0.0021124408,0.00071960787,0.01463074,0.02786448,0.00032057185,0.0028488904,0.0012383345,0.9499392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010429706,0.0008300649,0.00020086746,0.0042917877,0.0025073092,0.00006742039,0.00080934155,0.00017234094,0.99007785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989139,0.00010432527,0.00007026312,0.00020631735,0.0005694557,0.00013576093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997086,0.00027558213,0.000106308,0.00026266405,0.0014798199,0.0007897146],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076438487,0.00081117457,0.000647868,0.0012820764,0.0024223642,0.005827679,0.0014374481,0.0033716464,0.8532291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048538577,0.0004238017,0.00049351866,0.0010298152,0.00042888924,0.0037233178,0.0025206471,0.0023647735,0.7688554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009079547,0.000016668084,0.00007309331,0.000050432962,8.24999e-7,0.000028885304,0.000017774992,0.0000072847615,0.00006700591,0.0010491387,0.9645577,0.034121968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028879601,0.0000069916737,0.00011557168,0.000028159897,7.627356e-7,0.000031234023,0.00003229195,0.0000062001895,0.000025359393,0.0002515148,0.99949753,0.0000015813476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021209992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050960477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1467709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013819482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033881373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995512423","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Students Shine a Light on Freedom of Expression","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Event (particle physics); Civil liberties; Bridge (graph theory); Legal education","score_opus":0.02510102329302714,"score_gpt":0.3432802927986756,"score_spread":0.31817926950564845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995512423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063185166,0.0043455674,0.0005727944,0.1684254,0.010027844,0.0000892525,0.0004364615,0.0001584609,0.8096257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022157056,0.0015538284,0.0002540213,0.015088189,0.0007594596,0.000056462282,0.00011374193,0.00012526395,0.9598919],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803644,0.00036970494,0.000045151693,0.00022072806,0.0005522542,0.0007755828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803394,0.00028548331,0.00007351561,0.00015890569,0.0002706719,0.0011775183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022402294,0.00075298105,0.0005273329,0.00066200114,0.012044561,0.013575163,0.0007311166,0.00626115,0.20806351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031267682,0.0006138342,0.00048186717,0.0006833209,0.007931853,0.008382648,0.010226217,0.010608608,0.03629702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023725053,0.000048023932,0.00029510725,0.000042860756,0.0000020590317,0.0001016845,0.0021712014,0.000023596165,0.00021176404,0.028478228,0.9528557,0.015746178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034273596,0.0000057563025,0.0003498565,0.00004557331,5.538958e-7,0.000014277657,0.0019454053,0.000005400794,0.000060687245,0.0009258127,0.9966382,0.0000050607173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04444855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12852062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20806351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004755958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075492556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6960418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995517388","doi":"","title":"Ontario student group wants fair pay mandated for those in Law Practice Program","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Legislation; Work (physics); Confidentiality","score_opus":0.06729412546603161,"score_gpt":0.4110294865592738,"score_spread":0.3437353610932422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995517388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2868036,0.0003001764,0.0011622532,0.063778624,0.0009955737,0.001513355,0.007720396,0.00038213484,0.6373438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35310483,0.00016126526,0.0014289838,0.019108528,0.00022802824,0.0005494758,0.0016526764,0.000075652446,0.6236905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98579293,0.0007717115,0.00031748545,0.0007558108,0.0061716284,0.0061904797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707753,0.0024019491,0.00073099823,0.0012520691,0.008655631,0.016183969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063931956,0.0003093315,0.0006012697,0.0015169125,0.0154421665,0.0046022483,0.0031294134,0.0069511184,0.039209016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016957276,0.0007125316,0.0007306931,0.0013358454,0.0019495757,0.0011202797,0.003397313,0.0048663965,0.0058069048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059642125,0.0016562826,0.17607151,0.00011909475,0.00006616255,0.0008278009,0.006592882,0.0006172179,0.0030594626,0.083374985,0.66755104,0.059467107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031304365,0.00031035894,0.47690642,0.00014673977,0.00008602733,0.0002670642,0.006703613,0.001142937,0.0021590022,0.004197591,0.5076626,0.000104512255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8720822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98142356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12791783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033686724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16519435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25734228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995529163","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Hall Law School: First in Canada in Experiential Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Curriculum; Experiential education; Legal education; Scope (computer science); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.024424707140857302,"score_gpt":0.317610207857738,"score_spread":0.2931855007168807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995529163","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037243783,0.01891909,0.0022502285,0.51742727,0.008268818,0.0003559776,0.0009958382,0.0005151497,0.41402388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19475646,0.0081329895,0.0025140822,0.055754595,0.00045487503,0.00013616805,0.00051649887,0.0003059912,0.7374284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934127,0.00040544933,0.0000945283,0.0005495958,0.0016111403,0.0039266236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764573,0.0003282122,0.00020281614,0.000229138,0.0025218658,0.02026076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038177571,0.0005750407,0.0004095784,0.0012344897,0.0425668,0.013547492,0.0026212388,0.0064593293,0.07870275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004276048,0.0009097253,0.00041705667,0.0027835856,0.011316502,0.0056256033,0.008581135,0.011129793,0.0060306974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045955287,0.0003218606,0.0053037363,0.00014067991,0.0000057252164,0.00056580093,0.009039529,0.00012498663,0.0005376739,0.04414125,0.8540729,0.08569978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012949786,0.000029348912,0.0074008643,0.00020262515,0.0000031364375,0.00011528883,0.012383004,0.000067675144,0.00017842649,0.0012280834,0.9783449,0.000033742337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9667622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99168164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8776331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12236693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32766017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88783836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995617627","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Visiting Faculty Collaborate with Students and Put Law into Action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; The arts; Residence; Creativity; Narrative; Mentorship","score_opus":0.042536338567792174,"score_gpt":0.38174361209158897,"score_spread":0.3392072735237968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995617627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01007605,0.0016228129,0.0017596361,0.049813014,0.005322334,0.00016983326,0.0002990016,0.0010053738,0.92993194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033400495,0.00094422017,0.0016488063,0.0055856486,0.00028778886,0.000060728686,0.00017767836,0.00036183716,0.9575328],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875546,0.00019341611,0.000035104807,0.0001697411,0.00036010248,0.00048616086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676764,0.0001715843,0.00009972637,0.00017520392,0.0004119176,0.0023739806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015838719,0.0005068011,0.0002589093,0.0011808353,0.01113384,0.008990164,0.0009954339,0.0019225936,0.24779758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038284403,0.0005487859,0.0002940104,0.0005758947,0.003721857,0.0053632655,0.006864614,0.004402029,0.041313507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012305889,0.000054856784,0.00070900546,0.000030211411,0.0000019175056,0.00021401545,0.0042976355,0.000024850851,0.00026884134,0.013918438,0.9366834,0.04378445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018239919,0.0000054169304,0.00041015344,0.000034864155,4.905089e-7,0.000053488224,0.004907478,0.0000136077115,0.00006734099,0.00046804379,0.9940328,0.000004480582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04224072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17443332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24779758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005101597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00785136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8289655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996870138","doi":"","title":"Teaching and learning in Canadian legal education: an empirical exploration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socratic method; Teaching method; Empirical research; Legal education; Legal research; Focus (optics); Order (exchange); Socratic questioning","score_opus":0.05503584505597889,"score_gpt":0.3688873549312066,"score_spread":0.3138515098752277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996870138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761537,0.0007625912,0.00026086325,0.00258332,0.000031396736,0.00022689928,0.00041546763,0.000020400184,0.019545427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99387074,0.00095627236,0.00048654075,0.00037176127,0.000009224779,0.00007390779,0.00020170276,0.000012771162,0.004017023],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98816526,0.0017927631,0.00032982434,0.0006899271,0.005923915,0.0030982932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97659665,0.0072351345,0.0023443457,0.00042903947,0.008582624,0.0048121526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006640587,0.00047805315,0.00077473297,0.0059950026,0.02862977,0.0066010505,0.0031648297,0.0013912673,0.0054526404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02680001,0.0006476933,0.00044210677,0.013862807,0.0074693277,0.00237969,0.0048478954,0.0027276105,0.00028109667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015278089,0.00082124386,0.20135587,0.00059053337,0.000032077616,0.0008172167,0.6733773,0.00040773524,0.00050665135,0.013795713,0.008104651,0.100038335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002698796,0.00011020358,0.28946868,0.00046219572,0.000031712127,0.00017433739,0.6661659,0.0009770502,0.00036545735,0.00060156407,0.041534442,0.00008146512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19048163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19048163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24389374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9389266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996949540","doi":"","title":"The Ten Evidence ‘Rules’ That Every Family Law Lawyer Needs to Know","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Hearsay; Family law; Irony; Bit (key); Federal Rules of Evidence","score_opus":0.051832510793772824,"score_gpt":0.34481167842589955,"score_spread":0.2929791676321267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996949540","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055477177,0.013637447,0.09215734,0.55140185,0.015280489,0.0004548366,0.0010182131,0.00054787664,0.31995422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31647655,0.020298207,0.21707101,0.25716358,0.007882135,0.0013592702,0.0017703996,0.0005687813,0.17741002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721734,0.009740391,0.004263016,0.0027916604,0.009581893,0.001449806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9468783,0.024470719,0.0039793593,0.0067375787,0.015837979,0.0020961072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023924803,0.0010462153,0.00096559356,0.0017787776,0.005653544,0.0148026645,0.003111933,0.008093581,0.010309522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07711319,0.0013517973,0.0011456257,0.0011280908,0.026818682,0.018867314,0.0041106124,0.024496878,0.0070944126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004361154,0.00005274108,0.0009820878,0.00046114743,0.00003153131,0.00033796765,0.004605159,0.00028183075,0.0006384676,0.78647435,0.15359625,0.052494828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019735262,0.000041071376,0.00090955273,0.0014263588,0.00002847165,0.0005034343,0.0035288534,0.00056414155,0.0010543356,0.43010455,0.5617156,0.0001038515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017790494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017029075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023924803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00559947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016770512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12652797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997141549","doi":"","title":"UGA SCHOOL OF LAW ENROLLS A SUPERIOR CLASS","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Quarter (Canadian coin); Test (biology); Point (geometry); School class","score_opus":0.08928111805872678,"score_gpt":0.36603121923667303,"score_spread":0.27675010117794624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997141549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016704874,0.0008797168,0.0004883718,0.018100422,0.0065197903,0.00088288623,0.011513623,0.006782629,0.93812764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011453826,0.00031350367,0.00028497833,0.003445347,0.00078165386,0.0001904167,0.0025768206,0.00043544936,0.980518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980263,0.00012641259,0.00006740783,0.00029214352,0.0008400493,0.00064755254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710995,0.00005252044,0.00010597712,0.00021266825,0.0006978406,0.0018210572],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013214162,0.0012653478,0.0009804178,0.0018907953,0.007616318,0.005755112,0.0017196392,0.004108692,0.57291985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021997457,0.00075999746,0.00072341145,0.0010924783,0.0007952751,0.0016731787,0.004657079,0.0034060082,0.43657705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002740289,0.00019521746,0.0010289244,0.000020676995,0.0000022639424,0.00010104287,0.000054042324,0.000007833902,0.00020064745,0.0004295583,0.98070014,0.017232336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024772458,0.000095200936,0.0091510285,0.00004153737,0.0000048352917,0.000066353045,0.00024050224,0.000050645627,0.00015887195,0.000118844764,0.99003524,0.000012161117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03147807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10248116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57291985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004066886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057283803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60917795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997205244","doi":"","title":"Transnational Legal Practice in a North American Common Market","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UF Law Scholarship Repository (University of Florida)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Single market; Legislation; Common law; Legal practice; Government (linguistics); Globalization; Liability; Context (archaeology); Negotiation","score_opus":0.017924688902772535,"score_gpt":0.28919730532076704,"score_spread":0.2712726164179945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997205244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3747185,0.0016023251,0.0038419657,0.13539718,0.0005785592,0.00003869813,0.000016436796,0.00004308924,0.48376322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96244895,0.0005116972,0.00090912456,0.011409162,0.00009442312,0.000034473236,0.000006433926,0.000011163147,0.02457454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920839,0.0032608248,0.00019154618,0.0010009027,0.0014763267,0.0019865192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944231,0.0022905548,0.00066663686,0.00053389167,0.0009369384,0.0011487735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061921272,0.00017410469,0.00030639698,0.0006814428,0.019607035,0.008451935,0.00091501203,0.0052012443,0.006715813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007588304,0.00022399459,0.00039042442,0.0011569638,0.017865507,0.0058834837,0.010082703,0.006634328,0.0003706729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009521904,0.000079427,0.004711754,0.000022469145,0.0000053201966,0.001531257,0.077126466,0.00019077618,0.0002519656,0.88701844,0.014291667,0.014760949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028342582,0.00009913859,0.010779223,0.00036518608,0.000023161281,0.0019827557,0.28537267,0.0014956187,0.0006216292,0.11530531,0.5838461,0.00008092937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08675073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20672776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91324925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076461453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02031146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17249161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997212049","doi":"","title":"The Unintended Benefits of Innovation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Referral; Gateway (web page); Unintended consequences; Legislation","score_opus":0.05455856331276578,"score_gpt":0.3357523395862343,"score_spread":0.28119377627346853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997212049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090519115,0.01807596,0.009789429,0.4341459,0.0043139984,0.00027465684,0.0010360903,0.0004213327,0.44142348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90237266,0.0063831704,0.0056949244,0.04807737,0.0025352945,0.00032357557,0.00017563808,0.00012461579,0.034312613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702517,0.014512554,0.0012824585,0.0021503987,0.008687223,0.0031156102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87141275,0.079467095,0.008032501,0.018952634,0.014977248,0.0071577574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028945722,0.00050608546,0.00052630797,0.0020111746,0.0028823141,0.0067879613,0.0021536527,0.006867517,0.032585904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10829433,0.00025883625,0.0010214404,0.0012244589,0.012748164,0.009786251,0.0070350603,0.0042400127,0.0031351487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038087447,0.0005744493,0.026052136,0.0010720628,0.00017451959,0.0011916053,0.0061413446,0.0013179244,0.0006248149,0.64170116,0.06473474,0.25603434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019149334,0.0006981491,0.029967127,0.0037036892,0.00019862637,0.0017319461,0.0076325824,0.0022256938,0.0013861292,0.49300888,0.45911503,0.00014069366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004001051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047254935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032585904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004699115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00840232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15308148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998526554","doi":"","title":"2010 Academy of Law Alumni Fellows Dinner and Induction Ceremony Program","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Ceremony; Work (physics); Higher education","score_opus":0.07516377893102544,"score_gpt":0.42778231512676784,"score_spread":0.3526185361957424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998526554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16389745,0.0010557945,0.002088192,0.070958786,0.0212973,0.0017979618,0.0015343316,0.0014673632,0.73590285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08870715,0.00041073078,0.0013885888,0.0031696544,0.00261984,0.00041370612,0.00073709217,0.000078714984,0.9024746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979729,0.00019878047,0.00006271247,0.00017234446,0.0007680568,0.000825174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886673,0.00023786249,0.00022755211,0.00033405723,0.0017864263,0.008746797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004421299,0.00059178,0.0005863824,0.0019985305,0.00917732,0.0037621954,0.0013492113,0.0030130323,0.16753626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055836705,0.0005041033,0.00048653616,0.00042802887,0.0008865302,0.0013611784,0.005593868,0.0037649127,0.049342778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036544015,0.004656553,0.014008041,0.0000951983,0.000014358821,0.00066191226,0.00097397063,0.00013678338,0.0024661745,0.0060261474,0.7378869,0.23270857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105595995,0.000761169,0.09220765,0.00011728049,0.000013322861,0.00026627613,0.002574885,0.00084877294,0.001245016,0.0012845327,0.900534,0.000041619554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006992099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04600969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16753626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003334824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015125322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5604646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998825840","doi":"","title":"A better understanding of how to become a lawyer in Canada: regulations and implementation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Legal profession; Process (computing); Minor (academic); Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Civil procedure; Legal education","score_opus":0.014211320240135033,"score_gpt":0.2636225276519949,"score_spread":0.24941120741185988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998825840","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11041733,0.019752437,0.014038423,0.42538834,0.002016045,0.0008873809,0.0017160805,0.000621608,0.42516235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80684054,0.018880716,0.01755187,0.048715595,0.00027529933,0.00033757652,0.0007312754,0.00025074504,0.10641649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789059,0.0021870208,0.00067576644,0.0015794723,0.009687309,0.0069644973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9583606,0.0048071058,0.0021560746,0.000858882,0.022422437,0.011395012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011519155,0.00049074256,0.00042084494,0.0031917167,0.019111102,0.013139449,0.003425314,0.0049470984,0.008607008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03247725,0.00067376596,0.00066661555,0.0059155202,0.008038483,0.0046598185,0.0036382056,0.0074067856,0.00086315494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000618055,0.00033571207,0.05570394,0.0009068291,0.00004660014,0.0010060957,0.044501223,0.0035631806,0.002152139,0.4358284,0.18666376,0.26923022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003328137,0.000095368414,0.13919978,0.0014983511,0.000038478855,0.000206652,0.044659927,0.0019857662,0.00094138266,0.010803855,0.8002799,0.00025724288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99575657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25655884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25655884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.52229565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8622864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998931863","doi":"","title":"Building Community Connections: The Second Interim Report of the WellCoMs Mobile Van Project","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Service (business); Foundation (evidence); Rural area; Community service; Rural community","score_opus":0.044148573885585234,"score_gpt":0.36774709434994046,"score_spread":0.3235985204643552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998931863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48871323,0.0043421537,0.006404555,0.11587359,0.0031492966,0.009266949,0.0031072854,0.0008323886,0.3683106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59882706,0.005541227,0.014146233,0.009431465,0.00042108377,0.0040855072,0.0053627845,0.000390195,0.36179444],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954247,0.0013605937,0.0001050007,0.00023778276,0.0015076314,0.0013642911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98843944,0.0006862718,0.00028579216,0.0002927205,0.002792843,0.007503009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006200957,0.00041153433,0.00022593448,0.0009515274,0.008316872,0.0046305927,0.001818491,0.0027040115,0.015186239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006110528,0.00041473852,0.00025501783,0.00056857156,0.0010739798,0.0021876926,0.004921294,0.0025015313,0.0019843453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016776824,0.0039706193,0.024860017,0.0005934172,0.000029959432,0.0019852065,0.03941068,0.0005322933,0.003208647,0.013091385,0.5255774,0.3865727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008381601,0.0011906001,0.03516467,0.00040085576,0.00002260376,0.00036408883,0.080559656,0.00034825888,0.0016201753,0.0012710495,0.87892574,0.00004851893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080722354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3184787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080722354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004677793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035864465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.160505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999055950","doi":"","title":"Canadian Association for Legal Ethics presents two awards: Best Paper Award to Adjunct Professor Jennifer Leitch ’09 (LLM), ’16 (PhD) &amp; Lifetime Achievement Award to Distinguished Research Professor Allan Hutchinson","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjunct; Association (psychology); Legal ethics","score_opus":0.09061047706418816,"score_gpt":0.42954877025784255,"score_spread":0.33893829319365437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999055950","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015410329,0.008683957,0.0009996981,0.5161581,0.048716493,0.0003054033,0.0032788105,0.00030558681,0.4200109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024862844,0.005625496,0.003934226,0.037452064,0.0039343047,0.0001434686,0.0022220241,0.00020755731,0.92161804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97977304,0.0007479093,0.0006533224,0.00080714485,0.013916446,0.004102113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93492395,0.0033614738,0.0007211517,0.0017217491,0.03596249,0.023309054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011841621,0.00096267054,0.0011946288,0.0047890996,0.017846715,0.013840629,0.0030662925,0.016645398,0.13223067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03621215,0.00094186544,0.0015737151,0.0026314375,0.0043088146,0.0029817952,0.005353603,0.010481052,0.019979728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010611248,0.000020780273,0.00039327712,0.000037993854,0.000006607974,0.000036861522,0.00008558774,0.00003110087,0.000033185923,0.018348124,0.96818125,0.012814627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000112041325,0.000005237632,0.0013161983,0.00009471233,0.000009402023,0.000027018097,0.00030616406,0.00010828853,0.000040801868,0.0030605737,0.9949956,0.000024760686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92871356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97838414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13223067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08621154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37398162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6255114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999357151","doi":"","title":"Citation on His Excellency Hon. Mwai Kibaki on his Conferment of the Honorary Doctors of Law (LLD) of the University of Nairobi, Kenya","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Nairobi Research Archive (University of Nairobi)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Term (time); Citation analysis","score_opus":0.07373551707807996,"score_gpt":0.3076221877711467,"score_spread":0.23388667069306673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999357151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009601277,0.048521902,0.00074230466,0.08347146,0.071127795,0.00013332239,0.00054712745,0.00017820952,0.79431784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001482848,0.003609833,0.00010866655,0.004288572,0.0013881709,0.000016956648,0.00006083167,0.00004827239,0.9889959],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968994,0.00004877352,0.00001282431,0.000051863022,0.00013848391,0.000058102443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999613,0.00011218602,0.00001600575,0.000015581334,0.00015751272,0.00008577255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006080371,0.0007285241,0.0006290154,0.001123664,0.00499535,0.0027996858,0.0007055932,0.0017499651,0.09911464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017413865,0.00040398518,0.0002156926,0.0011100179,0.00091167685,0.0030438225,0.0013534462,0.003519953,0.0412718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004230503,0.000006568868,0.000031283344,0.000031051022,5.9753575e-7,0.000026538208,0.0002595461,0.000008137223,0.00003662126,0.0046811397,0.9848161,0.010098224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.8513153e-7,0.000002767345,0.00013212374,0.000038122387,5.9099074e-7,0.0000304346,0.00016242168,0.000007696583,0.00001513754,0.00031301688,0.9992951,0.0000018487556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023499014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11312859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09911464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025612325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022389584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33157152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999578164","doi":"","title":"Current trends in Canadian civil justice system reform : manufactured simplicity or equitable access?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Economic Justice; Disadvantage; Civil society; Equity (law); Context (archaeology); Inequality","score_opus":0.07320641961911371,"score_gpt":0.3822552198874809,"score_spread":0.3090488002683672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999578164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15442006,0.07912028,0.0028537384,0.60694027,0.0011685702,0.00015516076,0.0016379205,0.00022172119,0.15348238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9183005,0.034471307,0.0034076886,0.02597332,0.00032960548,0.00008130811,0.0006232982,0.00007630771,0.016736649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98368376,0.0013233747,0.00041274333,0.0010488513,0.007630912,0.0059003877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97368544,0.0025968964,0.0011436968,0.0006261601,0.016359422,0.0055882963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008185652,0.00050574454,0.0008740191,0.0055254903,0.020614238,0.013728136,0.0037160409,0.0031586075,0.012097588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01987219,0.00046788275,0.00069217646,0.01026029,0.014496542,0.005576545,0.0053144707,0.0053703645,0.0005347792],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016175225,0.00015032962,0.048865095,0.0023759077,0.0001240737,0.00065248355,0.04209024,0.002100099,0.0011744776,0.4940732,0.11203481,0.29619762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057600722,0.00009905735,0.19813843,0.0023418537,0.00012321303,0.00026796802,0.070844196,0.002371015,0.0007578686,0.030209476,0.69451064,0.00027861766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6641815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3358185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46203122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7703564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000516844","doi":"","title":"Family Legal Services Review Submission on Unbundling &amp; Legal Coaching","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coaching; Unbundling; Economic Justice; Practice of law; Service (business); Legal service; Legal practice; Work (physics); Vetting","score_opus":0.07335737450307632,"score_gpt":0.36176311099616837,"score_spread":0.28840573649309204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000516844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018595828,0.021795837,0.0027543253,0.22048771,0.10802047,0.0046954327,0.005475066,0.00087543926,0.6340362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017791934,0.0482429,0.005359705,0.08070487,0.033945467,0.0033077057,0.005020674,0.0009882089,0.80463856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850213,0.0029205969,0.0016171947,0.0006506064,0.008350599,0.0014396913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8490604,0.01636331,0.00541326,0.005547834,0.115101695,0.0085135335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01399686,0.0008236902,0.0012876132,0.0069560944,0.0053421864,0.0049019037,0.0022444073,0.008383299,0.18840896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0806956,0.0008243827,0.0012198868,0.004563958,0.0023856768,0.003082389,0.0032895913,0.0038957663,0.087986134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006954399,0.000015129906,0.00011795298,0.00023205408,0.0000040618806,0.00009246227,0.00005607088,0.0000087141325,0.000047357113,0.00065585546,0.97731006,0.021453362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008413132,0.0000124524095,0.0009832,0.0008840901,0.00000376471,0.000117489675,0.00010709029,0.000024087149,0.000056790184,0.00039659854,0.997396,0.000009985544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039409094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07521805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18840896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066321883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03275877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63029075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000577396","doi":"","title":"100% of first-gen and veteran students receive scholarship aid","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Value (mathematics); Legal education; Class (philosophy); Quarter (Canadian coin); Higher education","score_opus":0.04690689058789104,"score_gpt":0.36279183275649746,"score_spread":0.3158849421686064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000577396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18684515,0.010343038,0.0014305669,0.14618517,0.006948763,0.00059467356,0.032131705,0.0025136734,0.6130073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24916045,0.009940927,0.0011225493,0.054317288,0.0016179932,0.0004141476,0.018984118,0.00043171243,0.6640109],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974138,0.00021759768,0.000074823045,0.00016253574,0.0012225236,0.000908784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961683,0.00028862877,0.00039443426,0.00025197657,0.0008463969,0.0020503777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012232064,0.00036030708,0.0004837446,0.0014573914,0.0023737338,0.0019637574,0.0008993157,0.0016547029,0.1038339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005242175,0.00037395995,0.0004490675,0.0016814356,0.0007228098,0.0012959322,0.0035377804,0.0021211668,0.05700492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002867425,0.00017134893,0.04785369,0.000068318055,0.000008522545,0.0001563962,0.00044351633,0.000019844103,0.0004736789,0.0028172305,0.833218,0.114740826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033662876,0.000090300804,0.123437546,0.00015766654,0.000008223742,0.00034889163,0.001848796,0.000118239805,0.0003686394,0.00074976706,0.87282,0.000018109486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021657258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049405333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1038339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007916922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051584216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.347359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001399396","doi":"","title":"Inspiring national indigenous legal education for Aotearoa New Zealand's Bachelor of Laws Degree: Phase One","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Research Commons (University of Waikato)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department of Education and Training; University of Toronto; Dalhousie University; Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; McGill University; Australian Government; Charles Sturt University; University of Oxford; University of Waikato","keywords":"Aotearoa; Bachelor; Indigenous; Foundation (evidence); Phase (matter); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.34434488996840457,"score_gpt":0.5010587851177175,"score_spread":0.15671389514931294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001399396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6155414,0.0022726017,0.0033536928,0.12151836,0.0015582332,0.015308765,0.00094655174,0.00017706375,0.2393233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7323867,0.0060190987,0.031243034,0.023603747,0.00029752884,0.011598752,0.001321246,0.00007311638,0.19345674],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968016,0.0008396139,0.00012535714,0.00019052294,0.0010810455,0.00096177607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895174,0.0019487296,0.0006312875,0.00037922902,0.0022202202,0.0053030797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091850115,0.00022603574,0.00027681215,0.0006658543,0.005427427,0.0037088573,0.0011949462,0.002514075,0.01184382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009428315,0.00026219833,0.00031084396,0.00051259174,0.0014211858,0.0022998662,0.0063747545,0.0025117549,0.0013022765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027028174,0.008551339,0.045486804,0.004235412,0.000032597432,0.0014912036,0.11508247,0.000628062,0.01321043,0.062443163,0.14322814,0.6053402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022233842,0.0030364785,0.1502529,0.0020380684,0.000032648375,0.00042337927,0.26879674,0.00044452908,0.0064583835,0.005620441,0.56260055,0.00007362043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03654587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14912088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03654587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007303403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10554492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07266629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001582509","doi":"","title":"Learning in Lockdown: Assessing the Impact of Online Legal Education on the Development of Professional Competencies and Identity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socialization; Legal education; Legal research; Identity (music); Legal profession; Curriculum; Session (web analytics); Term (time)","score_opus":0.04049584936110116,"score_gpt":0.41980390360017,"score_spread":0.3793080542390688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001582509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978072,0.000025881402,0.000046727528,0.00021163722,0.000005211563,0.000058201953,0.00003177222,0.000005841306,0.0018075802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976922,0.00007731862,0.00030454554,0.00015341972,0.000006114245,0.000060299586,0.00006993333,0.0000035491578,0.0016326047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646676,0.0006475576,0.000118041404,0.00020712151,0.0016323468,0.000928086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97716296,0.0044740527,0.0043490427,0.0009028057,0.0037878398,0.009323352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049078735,0.00026252502,0.0002645966,0.0012741407,0.002687225,0.0027735862,0.0014947946,0.0009439803,0.003477117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02291699,0.00031738653,0.0002834482,0.0007162812,0.0017360591,0.0018702763,0.0029274363,0.0018736627,0.0005282797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025232782,0.009602033,0.7958437,0.00012920427,0.000034820456,0.00041188655,0.072901584,0.0002555945,0.0017596759,0.00051576394,0.0031709983,0.11512237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002489207,0.0017128623,0.93276805,0.00008756812,0.000026529682,0.00009415964,0.05657688,0.00059223257,0.0009100006,0.00016973467,0.007003309,0.000033790606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2041837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4200349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2041837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053054267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009845273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40599042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001714122","doi":"","title":"Lawyer Ghuna Bdiwi Who Fought for Freedom in Syria Brings Legal Expertise to Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Action (physics); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.023454059332918456,"score_gpt":0.3163638634467746,"score_spread":0.29290980411385614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001714122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09321806,0.0047972216,0.0012118836,0.60915786,0.0067856177,0.00009686076,0.0001124091,0.00012927687,0.28449082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33399105,0.0025723528,0.0015005345,0.0851998,0.00061599904,0.000033364995,0.000037697468,0.000094383846,0.5759548],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717677,0.00030175742,0.000061015973,0.00026594775,0.00061193766,0.0015826119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949633,0.000775685,0.00014835373,0.00010929512,0.0014378326,0.0025655946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022430911,0.00029846965,0.0004470972,0.0009378282,0.05407978,0.007860502,0.0007558063,0.0071311793,0.029003322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007007186,0.00039888234,0.0004005578,0.00066319946,0.007597635,0.0029269198,0.004549883,0.01515989,0.0022966417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050094422,0.00016273929,0.011343187,0.00009168073,0.00002764214,0.0042615947,0.04224711,0.00025638548,0.0015278081,0.17736344,0.7087729,0.053895503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015676691,0.000038081267,0.0069867577,0.00019656404,0.0000192023,0.00085691473,0.035875376,0.0003269597,0.0010137132,0.00622178,0.94839126,0.00005758485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66678125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88731223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33321875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025595559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11008535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67036223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001731502","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics and Judicial Law Clerks: A New Doctrinal Account","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Public law; Philosophy of law; Economic Justice; Legal ethics; Private law; Duty; Legal profession; Common law","score_opus":0.07032394238223445,"score_gpt":0.3687460304642734,"score_spread":0.29842208808203896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001731502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017657949,0.013690766,0.021079795,0.18753466,0.0005403581,0.0000345645,0.000029781118,0.00004166166,0.7593904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93380207,0.0076887356,0.0058456426,0.014179623,0.0012802832,0.000057866728,0.000030222176,0.000063026164,0.037052494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921427,0.003182454,0.00020657014,0.00049154,0.002675684,0.0013010603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99549615,0.0023923276,0.00029478726,0.0003223233,0.0009944754,0.0004999273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005329545,0.00042417197,0.00035501868,0.0028263545,0.010214934,0.011787343,0.0021253615,0.0064953393,0.0040385723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007678744,0.000328289,0.0003370529,0.0014487588,0.05749614,0.0109427925,0.0041525075,0.0075927693,0.0005281196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.9253205e-7,0.000003654945,0.00005598378,0.0000042448028,3.1349595e-7,0.000014452086,0.0012405694,0.00004598618,0.000009145823,0.99653155,0.00080493226,0.0012885384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060177144,0.0000063589077,0.0006373145,0.0001554602,0.0000035703254,0.00007067428,0.003976896,0.0006357835,0.00006803021,0.90113115,0.09329777,0.00001104421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10577618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14083761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10577618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025323177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028946253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21032101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7002089478","doi":"","title":"Measuring Impacts of Legal Services – Bibliography, Network and Methodology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Foundation (evidence); Psychological intervention; Service (business); Civil service; Legal service; Legal research","score_opus":0.11262633396660243,"score_gpt":0.3662857915216923,"score_spread":0.2536594575550899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7002089478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048312366,0.12826045,0.2050203,0.011039246,0.0019513558,0.011321143,0.08885405,0.0024696873,0.5027713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1899575,0.17331448,0.5162414,0.0017470547,0.0008707868,0.020029813,0.04858452,0.0012746577,0.047979817],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98454463,0.007331335,0.002180009,0.0011955111,0.0045014173,0.00024716154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748013,0.015799379,0.0014521843,0.0023744982,0.005207263,0.0003652455],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016584473,0.00081147655,0.0011337353,0.0355694,0.0023838796,0.0054270923,0.0022522074,0.00087519584,0.021708008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04140173,0.0008433974,0.0007040567,0.06398939,0.002024651,0.0051881033,0.0037525445,0.00092445035,0.0042744647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009780746,0.00018565993,0.019146634,0.008118914,0.00012788105,0.00014525467,0.00463741,0.0027085708,0.00055681594,0.07112542,0.098507285,0.79464227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041752737,0.00031036153,0.063270904,0.01656559,0.00039531678,0.000695735,0.0072270078,0.003193975,0.0018463442,0.06481323,0.8415293,0.00011044984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017803723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023655968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9644306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008866702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00919816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087708116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7004766620","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Anti-Discrimination Intensive Program Honoured for Excellence and Innovation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Human rights; Enforcement; Privilege (computing); International law","score_opus":0.061152016504616866,"score_gpt":0.38124739507383615,"score_spread":0.32009537856921927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7004766620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015487907,0.0012960448,0.0021839608,0.0879143,0.013552318,0.000548916,0.0013175064,0.0010053235,0.8766937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018009117,0.00035894205,0.0010998946,0.005731916,0.00029794258,0.00008531314,0.00040371896,0.0001558597,0.9738573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952807,0.00027975373,0.00005565448,0.00033304782,0.002516209,0.0015345402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987845,0.0002562871,0.00014753065,0.00042739307,0.0029712433,0.008352535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029414685,0.000538522,0.0002821906,0.0010333518,0.0105255,0.007178357,0.0010187577,0.0027556836,0.17631762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004204611,0.00037703736,0.00034953372,0.0005296945,0.0024460568,0.0020685478,0.0064024804,0.005542895,0.031052718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033333406,0.00011511245,0.0009375085,0.000027086407,0.0000021218727,0.00009346223,0.00048620233,0.000024209601,0.0005501704,0.007863422,0.95129555,0.0385719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007857602,0.000026222528,0.0025995942,0.000030970587,9.801909e-7,0.000039937895,0.00061762414,0.000031839565,0.00015885796,0.0003026702,0.99617493,0.000008407224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16344744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46288088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83655256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008761641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044691928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5898412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006338798","doi":"","title":"UGA School of Law Class of 2010 is one of the most academically gifted in school history","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Test (biology); School class; State (computer science); Legal education; Quarter (Canadian coin); Point (geometry); Standardized test","score_opus":0.07121574570243257,"score_gpt":0.3582951951355941,"score_spread":0.28707944943316155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006338798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023346448,0.0024832678,0.00033000452,0.02850334,0.007890266,0.0003157883,0.009676124,0.0037820667,0.9236726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028817987,0.0009219181,0.0002904511,0.0035502694,0.0008224045,0.00008395296,0.002204242,0.00044153718,0.9628672],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937207,0.000048154954,0.000020818481,0.00010169109,0.00025175652,0.00020555199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826485,0.0000442946,0.000079653895,0.00009566237,0.000403101,0.001112521],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005605593,0.0006219664,0.0004957034,0.0012612153,0.007344609,0.0045936825,0.0007237297,0.0015658366,0.41710845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015193715,0.00037043868,0.00030044903,0.00092900736,0.00071231666,0.0013058821,0.0026617027,0.0019220619,0.20826484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012358405,0.000036464946,0.0012416542,0.000018733044,0.0000011059798,0.00007019163,0.00014291343,0.0000037354491,0.000090382615,0.00034968797,0.97967404,0.018358689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040665436,0.000019172508,0.010748486,0.000035105964,0.0000015998764,0.00005152935,0.0005044675,0.000011204672,0.00008940665,0.000050349936,0.98847765,0.000006891145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03530772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14481649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41710845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026926794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030586133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83142406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006932562","doi":"","title":"York University’s Osgoode Hall Law School Celebrates Black Excellence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Economic Justice; Parliament; Appeal; Excellence; Governor","score_opus":0.02929516884221697,"score_gpt":0.2913840759513225,"score_spread":0.26208890710910554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006932562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008492951,0.0022863427,0.00039308905,0.04921049,0.0045190603,0.000075173404,0.0010802987,0.0002908583,0.9336516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017927432,0.00063945,0.00019555296,0.002459153,0.00020236072,0.000017524764,0.00016318537,0.00009734564,0.978298],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989384,0.000081769926,0.00001600305,0.00009518028,0.00046601836,0.0004027301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829835,0.000063483174,0.000043191674,0.000073262316,0.00033676694,0.0011849055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009628072,0.00042346772,0.00021427355,0.00072300935,0.016067112,0.0059014745,0.0006289267,0.0019637183,0.229693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018388858,0.0003531508,0.00018150738,0.0007530887,0.002504092,0.0018325556,0.003809945,0.0026907825,0.032415386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006628618,0.000012233579,0.00042995455,0.000011903031,0.0000010082564,0.00007410469,0.0007209763,0.000007178464,0.000095573014,0.00797792,0.9817092,0.0089532975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012010246,0.000003127634,0.00113036,0.00002502612,5.6985834e-7,0.000013714634,0.001220268,0.000007345586,0.00004547954,0.00020797315,0.9973411,0.000003901937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54663193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8814548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45336807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013106251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016040891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9120761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7007851218","doi":"","title":"Alternative Perspectives on Lawyers and Legal Ethics: Reimagining the Profession","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Legal ethics; Scholarship; Ethos; Practice of law; Diversity (politics); Professional responsibility; Professional conduct; Legal realism","score_opus":0.06561607883120969,"score_gpt":0.4664292174892902,"score_spread":0.40081313865808055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7007851218","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03690308,0.090934224,0.014949261,0.57027465,0.0078369025,0.000045671197,0.0000349289,0.00009621717,0.27892515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.803194,0.05726586,0.011001012,0.054221474,0.009146346,0.00018948832,0.000038533653,0.00035739623,0.06458589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757295,0.017468257,0.0005733206,0.0010796741,0.0033626596,0.0017865543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95865786,0.034000546,0.0012104016,0.001330588,0.0027607104,0.0020399813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017365262,0.0008608888,0.0014056956,0.0050354493,0.018837677,0.035152785,0.0032053145,0.012428086,0.0042130467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019654948,0.00076004816,0.0007103887,0.0041577085,0.1258746,0.03429829,0.014562165,0.020853788,0.0008707337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010989927,0.000014870731,0.00016701486,0.00008255331,0.000002742615,0.00017759032,0.13337097,0.00008436727,0.000059932478,0.84778947,0.008719693,0.0095198825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001171743,0.000027733477,0.00021505941,0.0009317358,0.000007948222,0.0002704628,0.13499016,0.0003756946,0.0000988968,0.5172104,0.34583804,0.000022154813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011270291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0214349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035152785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022541558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018417915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16355121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7007986728","doi":"","title":"Alberta Legal Services Mapping Project: Research Proposal","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Criminal justice; Legal service; Plan (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Legal profession","score_opus":0.06669861566729728,"score_gpt":0.41127504368441814,"score_spread":0.34457642801712085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7007986728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06371368,0.0052909,0.047195025,0.07312935,0.0024387348,0.12322614,0.17319591,0.001985774,0.50982445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15490156,0.0072653457,0.39719078,0.009906042,0.00054521067,0.082039386,0.14728877,0.00049803697,0.20036486],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990589,0.00245675,0.00043230577,0.0007313857,0.0039862394,0.0018042699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818209,0.0022250991,0.00058432913,0.0009966921,0.010329078,0.0040439437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019383486,0.000836716,0.000711978,0.010974903,0.0071445545,0.009272046,0.0065416414,0.0026380722,0.02268153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017011117,0.0010290659,0.0006435951,0.018491715,0.002395232,0.002749308,0.005336489,0.002637435,0.0050492263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003188443,0.0010304108,0.02114618,0.0025031164,0.000042434152,0.0008652956,0.013853642,0.003304487,0.0014900536,0.1450404,0.5174903,0.29291487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018632076,0.0002005032,0.06297814,0.0013278031,0.00007739366,0.00030501618,0.042026695,0.002695905,0.0009874546,0.011188669,0.8778622,0.00016384474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82445914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85636795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17554086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042190623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22624375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3531493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008454788","doi":"","title":"The Communities Being Served are the Resources that are Needed: Innovations in Community-Based Justice in Ontario, an Anthology of Canadian Research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legal advice; Social justice; Community organization; Service (business); Legal service; Service provider","score_opus":0.1766220266453248,"score_gpt":0.38669092904415164,"score_spread":0.21006890239882683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008454788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02377665,0.08796233,0.0058815232,0.33459315,0.004049328,0.00037053216,0.00032248165,0.00014133859,0.5429026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58512235,0.07821849,0.009531161,0.024495358,0.00083575875,0.0004400115,0.0001489288,0.00022341165,0.3009844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935098,0.0016734464,0.00019002384,0.00044278166,0.002607803,0.0015760992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618596,0.0011089541,0.00019786331,0.000121834964,0.0011683252,0.0012170977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00594012,0.00067351555,0.0005538912,0.0030535606,0.041088033,0.013078218,0.0022619253,0.003856226,0.005417591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006532516,0.00049707416,0.00034026467,0.0056136237,0.045253094,0.0054509523,0.0051402426,0.0035812468,0.00046527426],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018177596,0.000026772823,0.0019531383,0.00050274027,0.0000076257293,0.00027966918,0.23002812,0.0001715067,0.0002365249,0.572237,0.14136186,0.053176872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000596724,0.000011999251,0.0037885874,0.00049024407,0.000009280026,0.000079521174,0.0694854,0.00008312618,0.000074660355,0.016835967,0.9091085,0.000026719044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9783553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22166412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22166412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30273604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9027593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008466828","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Forum on Civil Justice: Project Evaluation: Final Report","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Civil service; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.10611209678871562,"score_gpt":0.3896431925093996,"score_spread":0.28353109572068397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008466828","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15134425,0.0059753484,0.020833889,0.04677303,0.0036713185,0.46338794,0.06259445,0.0013375654,0.24408235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.320708,0.0048849457,0.099543065,0.010576785,0.0005394551,0.38736123,0.031849995,0.00085865654,0.14367788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8363852,0.06471903,0.008088729,0.003316708,0.07109458,0.016395751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7936882,0.017417204,0.004690899,0.005226851,0.1651152,0.0138615975],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19095501,0.002090381,0.0012175385,0.007258516,0.0111777885,0.007958633,0.0037811515,0.005096534,0.012728986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14004418,0.0013152888,0.0012504071,0.008284192,0.0038718784,0.0027100232,0.006099519,0.002611568,0.0029867569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004741973,0.0038449913,0.017904751,0.0048102443,0.00020590196,0.0006487634,0.022498427,0.002743054,0.0053501218,0.012563037,0.6009608,0.323728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004290371,0.0039473483,0.11072136,0.0038578997,0.00036341272,0.00015245321,0.032277856,0.0025526374,0.012680021,0.0035792373,0.8250222,0.00055503973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7778982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7725532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22210181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065966815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3342666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008676443","doi":"","title":"The cost of family law legal services in Canada: a historical and critical analysis of lawyers' business decisions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Practice of law; Legal profession; Scholarship; Legal ethics; Legal advice; Legal opinion; Legal service; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04251192271479714,"score_gpt":0.34284422580476104,"score_spread":0.3003323030899639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008676443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5894022,0.027358811,0.0010059695,0.105273694,0.00032446595,0.00014493034,0.0011636284,0.0000582035,0.27526808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685305,0.011788424,0.00038266572,0.0025550358,0.00007096922,0.000025045132,0.00015002063,0.00003168741,0.016465534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509394,0.0004360384,0.00008533188,0.0002632973,0.0022398185,0.0018816023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98648876,0.0035684442,0.0012245938,0.00018176861,0.006136011,0.0024004616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024625536,0.0002560643,0.00032349754,0.0073217005,0.03062119,0.011330028,0.0026133908,0.0025194066,0.0046874145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016566634,0.0004359839,0.0002506375,0.012779223,0.010721088,0.0032141015,0.0020374428,0.0038925698,0.00022192427],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011481985,0.00016915324,0.071355246,0.00031945697,0.00003636248,0.0022463778,0.29446575,0.0017591577,0.00040306555,0.41583574,0.08698318,0.12631178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013351696,0.000039238097,0.19390151,0.0010326783,0.000048458776,0.0004210527,0.27820554,0.0024296306,0.00044042955,0.010013575,0.513282,0.00017245824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99763596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37784022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.37784022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2983056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72161716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008704155","doi":"","title":"The Community Being Helped Is the Resource That is Needed","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Intermediary; Community organization; Economic Justice; Resource (disambiguation); Service (business); Empowerment; Capacity building","score_opus":0.0701207582092125,"score_gpt":0.3406310667620692,"score_spread":0.27051030855285674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008704155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03005311,0.004908248,0.007910269,0.31629685,0.0067423214,0.00029213692,0.00022211953,0.0006041412,0.63297075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6236073,0.0046719476,0.011106885,0.07413793,0.0020925337,0.00031865732,0.00036855528,0.0005950271,0.28310117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99049956,0.0039583645,0.00020789665,0.0008043558,0.0023049014,0.0022249753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871033,0.00093024847,0.00065710885,0.0010384422,0.0023379014,0.007932989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038540526,0.00061531557,0.0010383263,0.0015662085,0.023899807,0.012052094,0.0019258453,0.005424383,0.044861365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01039775,0.0004893797,0.0005897842,0.0009762336,0.019099731,0.011296289,0.02095425,0.005669532,0.013635393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008381017,0.00032892887,0.008048347,0.00048222244,0.00009495795,0.0025683958,0.091259204,0.00021728805,0.0023119277,0.224714,0.4651337,0.20475724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014432225,0.00007133165,0.0017004337,0.0003725696,0.000019180809,0.0007172973,0.04467271,0.000055242814,0.00014897365,0.023176182,0.9290104,0.000041342613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014742556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031866893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044861365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038603903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024934428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15007627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008763709","doi":"","title":"Celebrating Osgoode Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Theme (computing); Scholarship; Key (lock); Event (particle physics)","score_opus":0.07891522711934829,"score_gpt":0.41232009220644944,"score_spread":0.33340486508710115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008763709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007672912,0.017349737,0.0011620951,0.16414495,0.04530257,0.00011752772,0.0009426711,0.0007604971,0.7625471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024842666,0.0042833895,0.0011944287,0.014255922,0.0039577694,0.00010090999,0.00046018633,0.000585838,0.9503189],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904863,0.0013258834,0.00019801476,0.0012845629,0.004488806,0.0022164076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875563,0.00081776816,0.00031513313,0.0016697232,0.0025336575,0.0071074446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009450599,0.0007782095,0.00058346393,0.0026691724,0.012135674,0.015885461,0.0015171112,0.005111869,0.13799869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011367988,0.0006407095,0.0006122461,0.0019575395,0.006044321,0.005927416,0.012347202,0.0077344,0.040465668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016017986,0.00003453249,0.00019041986,0.00003877349,0.0000031612867,0.000089376765,0.0007904736,0.000011404453,0.00013733032,0.026440792,0.95740736,0.014840383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011769248,0.000003752178,0.00017967094,0.000034707882,5.105139e-7,0.000018909133,0.00038058215,0.000003754508,0.000045066623,0.00042062716,0.9989072,0.000003997217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03160739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09890361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98962116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010378813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015177413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46165156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009047720","doi":"","title":"Document: Common Law Legal Education in Canada's Age of Light, Soap and Water","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; SOAP; Legislation; Work (physics); Legal education","score_opus":0.012575803125286108,"score_gpt":0.2979295344519989,"score_spread":0.28535373132671277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009047720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077091334,0.003689418,0.00075654953,0.2265016,0.008086294,0.0010342777,0.011684838,0.0012137095,0.73932415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01339615,0.00090359355,0.0007699907,0.0367914,0.00050557987,0.00019871393,0.0009666564,0.00012547965,0.9463424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99190813,0.00015373522,0.0001735088,0.00028708868,0.00626505,0.0012125019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98673916,0.0022986543,0.00022212301,0.00045049563,0.008376909,0.0019127375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00359036,0.0006575371,0.00058620505,0.0021608244,0.016333124,0.0104140425,0.0028799141,0.021836942,0.09039251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0158617,0.00072077586,0.00073014945,0.0020407701,0.0035501667,0.0024428172,0.0020066632,0.008773853,0.018338326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012396575,0.000057009507,0.0003468021,0.000037517253,0.0000026430428,0.000078772966,0.00040975935,0.00005610703,0.00024000066,0.012445954,0.9797624,0.0065506278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006120137,0.00002421098,0.007880593,0.00018389351,0.000017641449,0.00005829281,0.0012740454,0.00011945143,0.0005673829,0.001467866,0.9882967,0.000048709924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9641414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98607904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09039251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038593482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19606683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30239302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009352162","doi":"","title":"Durkee presents at St. John's University","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Center (category theory); Security council","score_opus":0.03971394688846003,"score_gpt":0.31032925041181914,"score_spread":0.2706153035233591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009352162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031555064,0.013509125,0.00051629037,0.12773697,0.038406175,0.000109051645,0.00044022227,0.0002580557,0.8158686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073624016,0.0017338472,0.00009957791,0.0075522535,0.0020940395,0.000019111756,0.00004673233,0.00003641448,0.9810557],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990959,0.00009360749,0.000020248946,0.00013358443,0.00046497173,0.00019164031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878865,0.00016374279,0.00003877777,0.00007100548,0.0004277819,0.0005100069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095130486,0.00037351032,0.00028027242,0.0009665015,0.0066948077,0.0035095236,0.0006568359,0.0035775155,0.17012079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029327897,0.0003066109,0.00033578856,0.0006736369,0.000979368,0.0014829448,0.001585947,0.0037234346,0.0367354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007374228,0.000013404983,0.00014646318,0.000019171779,7.930137e-7,0.00011286884,0.00018848512,0.00001197966,0.00011718653,0.008764579,0.97255075,0.01806704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013028218,0.0000049817063,0.00031030184,0.000024601677,7.693235e-7,0.000040704763,0.00015485712,0.000011215138,0.0000629202,0.00042444025,0.9989618,0.0000020509601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024855703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.110701054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17012079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036281885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006113126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56911075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010033845","doi":"","title":"Former Georgia lieutenant governor and noted legal journalist to teach at Georgia Law this spring","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; State (computer science); White (mutation); Politics; Spring (device); Legal education; Common law; Legislation","score_opus":0.024650279725047963,"score_gpt":0.3343839126051762,"score_spread":0.30973363288012823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010033845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035358504,0.0035007976,0.0007721155,0.04760771,0.00924111,0.00015719273,0.0011130557,0.0022080347,0.9318641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062532593,0.0007346176,0.000392256,0.0065267584,0.00039656996,0.000029911826,0.0002304066,0.00016982459,0.98526645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959654,0.000043510623,0.000011457012,0.00008101141,0.00014376955,0.00012370259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986625,0.000076139746,0.0000494575,0.000064882515,0.00035276127,0.00079429295],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004537487,0.0004836058,0.00029115457,0.0013493482,0.0047830697,0.002658052,0.00061768404,0.0022104818,0.4182542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015361477,0.00039649638,0.0002491945,0.00060721126,0.0007824397,0.0015390356,0.0017692787,0.0023663018,0.27910066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025508937,0.000015290045,0.0001593782,0.0000105702775,3.316505e-7,0.00007845241,0.00010042304,0.0000037155623,0.00015258268,0.0008191398,0.9885493,0.010108325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016273032,0.000006016209,0.0009566673,0.000031579188,5.5230873e-7,0.00009850373,0.0002679351,0.000014860213,0.00004767392,0.00015192789,0.99842024,0.0000024100286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022201343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12415716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4182542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027852922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047577955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82978976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010151917","doi":"","title":"The Government Lawyer as Activist: A Legal Ethics Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Duty; Legal ethics; Loyalty; Point (geometry); Public policy","score_opus":0.04892725249220061,"score_gpt":0.3643957618899934,"score_spread":0.3154685093977928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010151917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08557686,0.0058681252,0.029221468,0.288821,0.00059364276,0.00014135594,0.000050790004,0.00003677134,0.58968997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95532745,0.0018519883,0.006138709,0.015446975,0.0006786283,0.00024584334,0.000025326595,0.000055665318,0.020229444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777869,0.01694067,0.00026037337,0.0006813742,0.0019995845,0.0023310124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98697644,0.009687863,0.00074739946,0.0004244594,0.0010545662,0.0011092909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012036376,0.00044491742,0.0004063838,0.002972352,0.015733559,0.015739998,0.0022205918,0.013448111,0.0044268332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010443263,0.00046840197,0.0006112855,0.0018124932,0.05562048,0.01190657,0.0064172847,0.008433943,0.0006897463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016996562,0.000019561907,0.0001781121,0.000009113883,9.2470066e-7,0.00009510071,0.005680218,0.00006706829,0.000022230499,0.9917424,0.0011786225,0.0010051541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001794496,0.00002553333,0.0006129642,0.00029004377,0.000008034642,0.00030162337,0.035119705,0.0017991451,0.00019653923,0.877827,0.08378195,0.000019482712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011738259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0119963465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02038043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02038043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014570612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14787108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010724597","doi":"","title":"Into the Future: Civil Justice Reform in Canada, 1996 to 2006 and Beyond","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Administration (probate law); Civil rights; Reform Act; Administration of justice","score_opus":0.010369999123223577,"score_gpt":0.28183723053304083,"score_spread":0.27146723140981727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010724597","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077951975,0.062336646,0.0012341246,0.5285686,0.004977907,0.000310124,0.007199619,0.00019986443,0.31722108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5604803,0.036248114,0.0035244322,0.059851047,0.00081524777,0.00023216197,0.0032363853,0.00011672635,0.3354955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99229586,0.0003918745,0.00015897631,0.00037798358,0.0036300025,0.0031453185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930479,0.00033493122,0.00030303825,0.000112625385,0.0031741527,0.0030273409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030477536,0.00067373,0.00059433974,0.0026658892,0.019909495,0.011268098,0.0018420832,0.004426339,0.01228332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010420462,0.00046904132,0.0005271766,0.009792343,0.0052122106,0.0037511184,0.0036793181,0.007233911,0.0008000938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017405182,0.00015578295,0.011522847,0.0006165526,0.00004594959,0.00075273716,0.019077634,0.002140332,0.00042222193,0.26584363,0.5549239,0.14432439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039170114,0.000027617607,0.037127998,0.00031794718,0.00002366812,0.00006549527,0.009370163,0.00048517928,0.0002950351,0.005282306,0.94690377,0.00006183258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99758387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35339966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.35339966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5818255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7499647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011207358","doi":"","title":"Lawyers' Ethics and Professional Regulation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Confidentiality; Legal ethics; Privilege (computing); Professional conduct; Context (archaeology); Professional ethics; Legal profession; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.05208571663247804,"score_gpt":0.38495266570488224,"score_spread":0.3328669490724042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011207358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008341161,0.017740954,0.008271918,0.20248803,0.0017273836,0.00013435549,0.0000464182,0.0001163016,0.7611334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48394597,0.011869247,0.005596036,0.047888536,0.0009072484,0.00018540629,0.000053389726,0.00010825054,0.44944593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798234,0.004144218,0.00034195636,0.0010662341,0.00945993,0.0051642465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99415755,0.001915934,0.0003271969,0.00033404602,0.002042675,0.0012225722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00756931,0.0003878032,0.0004715902,0.0012085486,0.023568295,0.0153840445,0.002539748,0.0070915218,0.008334513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012178555,0.00039286466,0.00033189886,0.0015014339,0.060689736,0.0033444576,0.0050734645,0.0075987354,0.0012008053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021199,0.000009710355,0.00020025595,0.000025894971,0.0000019109302,0.00007164055,0.016713416,0.000102173486,0.000055383713,0.9338952,0.037906572,0.011015753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054037523,0.0000046589794,0.00069235056,0.0002121594,0.0000022428574,0.00006715674,0.009446475,0.0001888897,0.00006611217,0.09576217,0.8935377,0.000014680576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7360834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7176224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7360834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.069364324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12610832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5309417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011665995","doi":"","title":"\"A NEED FOR A NEW KIND OF LAWYERING\" TO BE THE TOPIC OF ANNUAL SIBLEY LECTURE","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Presentation (obstetrics); Commission; Politics; Legal education; Critical legal studies; Dispute resolution; Philosophy of law","score_opus":0.10550734235611352,"score_gpt":0.37846251992175106,"score_spread":0.27295517756563753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011665995","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002032858,0.015686143,0.0014829651,0.60355115,0.080383636,0.000092769864,0.00008036254,0.00029217388,0.29639792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020485882,0.010289382,0.0024692607,0.07643751,0.022487953,0.00013585702,0.00014637093,0.00025897022,0.86728877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949799,0.0011955269,0.00016957456,0.0007173825,0.0016943965,0.001243225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99236226,0.00043538108,0.0002805822,0.00027981235,0.0011456796,0.0054962398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052084043,0.0008141296,0.0007278461,0.0009477324,0.007521088,0.012333167,0.0013820779,0.0064009,0.14732431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069315247,0.0006519141,0.0007290881,0.00053858926,0.0029578677,0.009899363,0.0070041805,0.012991856,0.057161752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011243518,0.000045209337,0.00010724891,0.00004118674,0.0000015687915,0.00006284655,0.0003849352,0.000011524375,0.00018694752,0.009896968,0.96959186,0.019658599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004179401,0.000012403971,0.0004481964,0.00006938836,0.000001028823,0.00007416642,0.0005915505,0.000015777212,0.000037846807,0.0013103266,0.99742943,0.000005828001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003331187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009576268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14732431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005486646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005894256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49284893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011716856","doi":"","title":"New Crossroads and the Opportunity for a Crisis: The State of Canadian Legal Education","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; State (computer science); Legal profession; Legal research; Apprenticeship","score_opus":0.048730519334134484,"score_gpt":0.34823714362625774,"score_spread":0.29950662429212327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011716856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15288594,0.040307235,0.0013236114,0.3737537,0.0013661119,0.00008261187,0.0011678268,0.0001797623,0.4289332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903282,0.017957268,0.0010936785,0.012173971,0.00020654035,0.00003358095,0.00040212128,0.000083230254,0.06476764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334246,0.00037797613,0.00011126157,0.00044562263,0.0024717713,0.0032508655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954383,0.00042251765,0.00022302146,0.00011469665,0.0020344998,0.0017670452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028380367,0.00047786615,0.0005274133,0.0045095826,0.02659116,0.015307986,0.0023526978,0.0028611,0.02067684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005888545,0.00049970794,0.00046161245,0.0071040425,0.011455095,0.005055866,0.005601775,0.0046656206,0.0007273968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015211292,0.00007168892,0.01835447,0.0007559009,0.00004327518,0.0008357152,0.058832258,0.0012349462,0.00056076184,0.52155954,0.16927987,0.22831942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021126356,0.000026437629,0.049196713,0.00090413966,0.000027512393,0.00014265398,0.09981345,0.0007749844,0.00022800367,0.018364228,0.830359,0.00014171646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99558216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7864446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2135554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30766186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9121643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7013257260","doi":"","title":"Moot Court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Argument (complex analysis); Class (philosophy); Work (physics); Strengths and weaknesses","score_opus":0.05999625848712472,"score_gpt":0.31780881238468894,"score_spread":0.25781255389756425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7013257260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0118101565,0.0006805878,0.0013717945,0.006881472,0.0025172494,0.00028192703,0.0024175728,0.0008395999,0.9731996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02833479,0.00026080516,0.0008800394,0.0014452789,0.0002109383,0.00006399343,0.0010458024,0.00027361664,0.9674847],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738044,0.00021153035,0.000097617325,0.00040448236,0.0012503349,0.00065560336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971347,0.00024704367,0.00011487777,0.00023052406,0.00088588457,0.0013869399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014486222,0.0005123336,0.0004853087,0.0015352491,0.010182843,0.0058459966,0.0013201224,0.0020651075,0.5016797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006338279,0.00052327494,0.0005336824,0.0011697437,0.0009932398,0.0018536247,0.0038533956,0.0032383155,0.13576409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009610604,0.00010331432,0.0030734243,0.000056450484,0.0000057429943,0.0009727282,0.0009036516,0.00012361804,0.00058221235,0.028427731,0.8884129,0.077242166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007854417,0.000028123353,0.0046452507,0.00007069361,0.0000015063966,0.00031794913,0.00077259867,0.00013768241,0.00015154877,0.0013861004,0.99246997,0.000010772792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044307686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19613606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5016797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004387449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007186024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014095836","doi":"","title":"In Brief","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Tribunal; The arts; Law library; Internship; Legal education; Class (philosophy)","score_opus":0.052772045107207365,"score_gpt":0.42651049789147244,"score_spread":0.3737384527842651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014095836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029312566,0.002384559,0.0007189573,0.012705923,0.029562267,0.00031894576,0.002704102,0.0011378252,0.9501744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009509116,0.00092980464,0.00022054215,0.0037990804,0.0025476334,0.00006951955,0.0008120859,0.00016428564,0.99050623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989022,0.000106297884,0.0000732846,0.00019823032,0.0005835714,0.00013642608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970964,0.00024740933,0.0001046887,0.00026864404,0.0014871681,0.0007955592],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007984442,0.0008365905,0.0006533235,0.0012580215,0.0022297131,0.0057791034,0.0014466026,0.0031831097,0.8462537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004796847,0.0004030773,0.00049621874,0.0010270714,0.00041817635,0.0037192502,0.0026167638,0.0022609872,0.7822086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085276715,0.000016748232,0.00006899622,0.000056072022,8.8788613e-7,0.000027714417,0.000016655433,0.0000071129557,0.00007159564,0.0010991145,0.9602383,0.038388174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023973985,0.000006780161,0.000109375134,0.00002967163,7.461901e-7,0.00003103016,0.000028155808,0.00000492224,0.000025163981,0.00024106642,0.9995191,0.0000015216965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019279005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047254935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1537463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001268687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035914348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014176627","doi":"","title":"Osgoode team of Anna Morrish and Andrea McPhedran place third overall in Canadian Client Consultation Competition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Economic Justice; Competition law; Performance art","score_opus":0.024441237408301085,"score_gpt":0.35062259527552714,"score_spread":0.3261813578672261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014176627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050678834,0.0031871402,0.0050953696,0.13377275,0.00798823,0.00081776304,0.0023015253,0.0013718776,0.7947866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.070170395,0.0009000485,0.0024953624,0.007392915,0.00017152565,0.00009866766,0.0006453278,0.00032384088,0.91780186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414635,0.0004343513,0.000057266283,0.00051722757,0.0025700766,0.002274774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838181,0.00033477365,0.00012347738,0.00021362244,0.004264551,0.011245367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031305784,0.00083265366,0.00053539255,0.0013331128,0.03556303,0.0075852596,0.0020388975,0.002494196,0.16188677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004469475,0.00071659393,0.0005178765,0.0011768367,0.003577728,0.0015331666,0.0054864557,0.005147695,0.019724151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003793843,0.00007135178,0.0020547525,0.000028777766,0.0000043615487,0.00031103502,0.0027524882,0.00010631262,0.00047854707,0.00938411,0.95981276,0.024957595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007441697,0.000028636432,0.00431398,0.000045797864,0.000003239199,0.00017452685,0.010099447,0.00018655714,0.00040912925,0.0006352392,0.9840571,0.000038807106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90966314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9823187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16188677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05345546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1354657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5415652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014211452","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Professional Development helps internationally-trained lawyers with new online course unique in Canadian legal education","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Professional conduct; Professional development; Legal education; Immigration; Online course; Lifelong learning; Distance education; Christian ministry","score_opus":0.03585518397626471,"score_gpt":0.3598098208419933,"score_spread":0.3239546368657286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014211452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015854662,0.0023241877,0.005216343,0.09863205,0.006287863,0.00088142755,0.0021806264,0.003028729,0.8655941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0290602,0.0016122983,0.008200527,0.009472303,0.00030436693,0.00015319424,0.0011802218,0.00038359204,0.94963324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974623,0.00013595595,0.000051893338,0.00020631285,0.0012950702,0.0008486396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862976,0.00024899206,0.00022908954,0.00022305378,0.0039040712,0.009097163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002128728,0.00052789436,0.00026140307,0.0023212843,0.008923225,0.004171084,0.0010058441,0.0014850412,0.20009351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059472565,0.0006179529,0.00037246864,0.0011421606,0.0021317594,0.0019266887,0.0044604475,0.0025830814,0.03971504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010216939,0.00006469744,0.0013765431,0.000033581717,0.0000013044959,0.00008735699,0.0006089719,0.000029718944,0.00041708947,0.0015813948,0.9348776,0.060911503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008145425,0.000014296131,0.0026650082,0.00004026658,0.0000017815872,0.00009209371,0.0009385012,0.00008771752,0.00023044548,0.0002804368,0.9956273,0.000014046598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7036406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9403335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.977843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022157004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.089406006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6693795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014531649","doi":"","title":"Presenter, \"How Green Was My Valley: Changing roles and Relationships of Lawyers in Silicon Valley and the Breakdown of the Cravath System and the Tournament of Lawyers,\" Joint Law and Society and Canadian Law and Society Conference, Vancouver, Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USF Scholarship Repository (University of San Francisco)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silicon valley; Tournament; Joint (building); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.023821111232206673,"score_gpt":0.20965494023035344,"score_spread":0.18583382899814677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014531649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039391615,0.0086696595,0.0008800255,0.82358557,0.13174458,0.00021835446,0.0027572114,0.0004668829,0.027738562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03339813,0.015118483,0.001015233,0.24523908,0.089926906,0.00067969685,0.0026258873,0.00059847074,0.61139804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931955,0.00010790308,0.000049509636,0.00013654088,0.0002720139,0.00011450633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963894,0.0012779447,0.00026503365,0.00008031793,0.0012811442,0.00070621667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024841651,0.0009996193,0.0008734355,0.0013514014,0.005488731,0.004806606,0.0018216773,0.0075514284,0.07843819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075401114,0.0005430709,0.0003864139,0.0015942384,0.00088071456,0.005261297,0.002007799,0.006697668,0.015594258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017304152,0.00002468479,0.00020062632,0.000054592267,0.0000014586024,0.000028566232,0.00037191468,0.00001955385,0.00009823544,0.00049790164,0.98987246,0.008812734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045544053,0.000051986266,0.0029904563,0.00014463895,0.0000133740905,0.00013660839,0.0032983087,0.00026142292,0.00034607275,0.00047625662,0.99221474,0.000020544863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014129839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037710533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07843819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002477332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039206403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26240188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014964435","doi":"","title":"Reaching Out With Research: Engaging Community in Mapping Legal Service Accessibility, Effectiveness and Unmet Needs","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Service (business); Stakeholder; Action (physics); Economic Justice; Stakeholder engagement; Community engagement; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.16574552006781326,"score_gpt":0.41489807204831564,"score_spread":0.24915255198050237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014964435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8495419,0.0027818063,0.04849408,0.024311999,0.00020333183,0.0028116275,0.00031041712,0.00021903837,0.07132581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369085,0.0014610371,0.05604642,0.001125507,0.000034972796,0.002339449,0.000117966905,0.000041504303,0.001924749],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9143396,0.0743184,0.0013903566,0.0021192299,0.004340965,0.0034914482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93799084,0.048464406,0.0027682774,0.0030683768,0.004337115,0.003370917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06664834,0.0007285977,0.000994323,0.013363922,0.017666023,0.012993781,0.003008017,0.003786427,0.0030763275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08866258,0.0007628062,0.00062098255,0.00964659,0.012113144,0.013356197,0.019093344,0.0023630732,0.00032850314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094587915,0.0002884759,0.021800876,0.0007015043,0.00006565154,0.000721864,0.7837525,0.0005036478,0.00087819505,0.014174325,0.0029587618,0.17405948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041309922,0.0001742548,0.010065004,0.0005861011,0.000050313767,0.0002638373,0.9346272,0.0014270775,0.0004706671,0.025432764,0.02679521,0.00006631771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0791157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18270268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0791157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014577132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045091398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35247433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015126894","doi":"","title":"Roundtable: Funding Strategies","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Fordham international law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.05906893910911396,"score_gpt":0.41502927070282974,"score_spread":0.35596033159371576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015126894","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059991926,0.0031490198,0.009543111,0.4221753,0.13068667,0.009370394,0.005499921,0.0016618582,0.4119146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017714482,0.0010768236,0.0068368167,0.10918016,0.010464664,0.0049879816,0.0022594351,0.00073937495,0.8467403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967051,0.0006856265,0.00017052302,0.0004247069,0.0009947986,0.0010192251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992446,0.0019535252,0.00032100888,0.0004310433,0.0026260721,0.0022223545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008443787,0.0015197905,0.00054016087,0.0011465946,0.006091499,0.007390946,0.0025554858,0.020811126,0.19191961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0144786835,0.0008838384,0.0010830738,0.00078226085,0.0009500662,0.005822322,0.0052954284,0.012546574,0.060019337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042469783,0.00003229076,0.00005609311,0.000047558366,0.000002218153,0.00010423645,0.00017324935,0.00007403535,0.00035567532,0.005333136,0.98561007,0.008168866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004782575,0.00003475027,0.00045036498,0.00009156157,0.0000030699146,0.000025191393,0.0005440397,0.00010036814,0.00017898307,0.0029818593,0.9955195,0.000022467508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009095423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023481386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19191961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042285267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008800633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64203507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015776086","doi":"","title":"Trauma-Informed Lawyering: Practicing Emotional Acknowledgment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University Library (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disconnection; Transformative learning; Legal practice; Legal profession; Legal process; Human Dimension; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.028034004036048072,"score_gpt":0.2766300794495687,"score_spread":0.2485960754135206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015776086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5378157,0.0076491735,0.0355327,0.05580815,0.0014740687,0.00033487217,0.000055476066,0.00025446594,0.3610754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493921,0.008309587,0.011588314,0.007472611,0.00019830342,0.00015556556,0.000040465646,0.000075407595,0.022767667],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613416,0.0024019459,0.00011280198,0.00023317363,0.00062034465,0.00049757137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969505,0.0012404284,0.0006206618,0.0002621619,0.00028596315,0.00064033654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003039018,0.00026608512,0.0002512704,0.00048637504,0.0037479585,0.006618737,0.0008740687,0.0018532304,0.007390768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007017362,0.00033374713,0.00038074108,0.00038620457,0.008860235,0.0047727367,0.0076437616,0.0038964623,0.0016711116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067897105,0.0010787566,0.014446107,0.0011099743,0.000038540664,0.0022832043,0.55509263,0.00045819598,0.007272125,0.14944877,0.030945987,0.23775788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046136312,0.000559989,0.02229475,0.0028443255,0.000054256358,0.0056521785,0.41241488,0.0009538228,0.0049990974,0.06920857,0.48085076,0.00012127718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000884431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002073498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007390768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015088322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039447867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024724603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015862800","doi":"","title":"Thinking about clinical legal education: philosophical and theoretical perspectives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophical methodology; Legal practice; Curriculum; Feature (linguistics); Clinical Practice; Legal education","score_opus":0.031764628757496985,"score_gpt":0.3462131657202818,"score_spread":0.31444853696278485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015862800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006691937,0.0448745,0.015527423,0.22938089,0.0033457098,0.0000798141,0.000044432047,0.00006906768,0.69998634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5344783,0.12532762,0.043990165,0.07753299,0.006631604,0.0010105085,0.00021306526,0.00016286952,0.21065292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579644,0.0030250442,0.000076226526,0.0001515344,0.0007359026,0.00021488205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940798,0.0048364894,0.0001802779,0.000095690004,0.0003634757,0.00044426776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053637056,0.00075835345,0.0004127269,0.0026368757,0.0055442667,0.011175428,0.0017343335,0.003998715,0.0048249797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044496343,0.00030050916,0.00039265404,0.002430648,0.043565944,0.008083198,0.0036692515,0.009550947,0.0011340966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028121315,0.000025129237,0.00006170845,0.00012008615,0.0000013217152,0.00009959187,0.012411192,0.0001817166,0.000045523397,0.96292114,0.014525273,0.009604383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011219982,0.000023359506,0.0002056475,0.00092742767,0.0000026063003,0.00033662078,0.030445576,0.0006221457,0.000079535144,0.68366474,0.28366584,0.000015271766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043904996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048903087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011175428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008883967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06104231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017157507","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice? The View from the Street","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; Focus (optics); Economic Justice; Service provider; Service (business); Social justice","score_opus":0.10437362971872606,"score_gpt":0.37783675243822334,"score_spread":0.2734631227194973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017157507","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020226352,0.006959585,0.00028552586,0.8715818,0.0018627825,0.0000041479557,0.000051023868,0.000021811225,0.09900699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6791211,0.016549528,0.00025527255,0.24694207,0.0030255157,0.00002230772,0.00006376022,0.00008507368,0.053935356],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998376,0.00053276756,0.000021765798,0.00011142946,0.00025808765,0.0006998731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984072,0.00029464217,0.00008592864,0.000063751955,0.00023469089,0.00091382803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001301251,0.00017348939,0.00037982443,0.00075240905,0.012813805,0.0098377075,0.00092577736,0.0072217984,0.020038895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033127563,0.00021467352,0.00024976823,0.0008323245,0.020738948,0.0088834,0.005388609,0.011692608,0.0015887802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035447625,0.000059874634,0.0033000768,0.000094179304,0.000013442961,0.00076703326,0.070639946,0.00005964894,0.00022285154,0.42685607,0.45697206,0.04097937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001545729,0.00003549003,0.003388723,0.00072404253,0.000011324941,0.0005060419,0.12585454,0.00006638534,0.000085064814,0.06845574,0.8008229,0.00003425653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15398967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2480913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15398967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065311785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009724516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30618674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017775479","doi":"","title":"Challenges for Lawyer Regulation: Access to Justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Reading (process); Face (sociological concept); Field (mathematics); Legal ethics; Professional responsibility; Information ethics","score_opus":0.11983413489502659,"score_gpt":0.41485401879275907,"score_spread":0.2950198838977325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017775479","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012027354,0.007295058,0.0033011716,0.6156765,0.0008679958,0.000042992866,0.000052697258,0.00007256101,0.3606636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79156345,0.0070466646,0.002094138,0.10042981,0.0009416507,0.000085397696,0.00006203448,0.00011565034,0.09766117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752494,0.0051130117,0.00042029095,0.0013902504,0.007338223,0.010488792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98637646,0.0043634274,0.0006169389,0.00061980705,0.0032225146,0.0048008393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013322721,0.0002494308,0.000832522,0.0011799324,0.031652447,0.028323753,0.003620495,0.015678756,0.02131829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031485904,0.00040495626,0.0004970351,0.0017840561,0.050416145,0.01427547,0.015063718,0.014203679,0.0015582555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008260478,0.000021429465,0.0005884587,0.000050684448,0.0000048722472,0.0001540331,0.016041674,0.0001368535,0.00008107822,0.9163357,0.049665455,0.016911583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016979779,0.000019379204,0.0023756083,0.0005771737,0.000009814312,0.00015994432,0.04839242,0.0004254299,0.00012217014,0.32699215,0.6208625,0.0000464322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7318266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71973324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7318266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058993105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15588814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5395054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017790209","doi":"","title":"A Call for Evidence-Based Research in ADR","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Work (physics); Action (physics); Population; Sustainable development; Civil society","score_opus":0.2972230296262774,"score_gpt":0.48028925816497875,"score_spread":0.18306622853870136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017790209","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000627891,0.30546272,0.012352805,0.62935054,0.040806185,0.0025034093,0.0006051339,0.0003074755,0.007983854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024192078,0.2096466,0.17512374,0.55490494,0.021663139,0.010522559,0.0013660139,0.00029853635,0.0022824148],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.42443565,0.4092035,0.090127684,0.016329458,0.054060202,0.0058435304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.056928214,0.7984549,0.02150448,0.044765275,0.06916852,0.009178587],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.57087713,0.0028684812,0.01331608,0.018859925,0.0070034545,0.03694737,0.019822272,0.058833484,0.032271776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7490394,0.0049838987,0.01832748,0.0153107615,0.028254798,0.061581064,0.020488476,0.05985442,0.009195032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012343536,0.0016793386,0.0045085913,0.21070203,0.004031124,0.0006345154,0.0043131,0.0010737149,0.0006700083,0.124297515,0.27970624,0.3671494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001012917,0.00045394292,0.0022162586,0.5148022,0.0016845297,0.00046287323,0.0042494475,0.0007371377,0.00027696666,0.075047314,0.39877072,0.00028567665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01520949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023560528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57087713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02677839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10968333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52918494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017840277","doi":"","title":"Canadian Access to Justice Initiatives: Justice Development Goals Status Report","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Conversation; Action (physics); State (computer science); Civil society","score_opus":0.07871070423357955,"score_gpt":0.4143699112467578,"score_spread":0.33565920701317825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017840277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060202193,0.0073490078,0.001569546,0.121738344,0.0021037946,0.0028718796,0.34325758,0.0010195194,0.45988813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36126858,0.014407484,0.013620219,0.027635502,0.00037088597,0.0035713862,0.23789476,0.000406067,0.34082514],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883434,0.00033650023,0.00030709108,0.00032391291,0.008253579,0.0024355873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693773,0.0005724296,0.0005820141,0.0003392672,0.020921828,0.008207116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055572614,0.0006834727,0.0005558152,0.0066052917,0.012450515,0.006473645,0.002199148,0.0018122861,0.013936001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012320737,0.0006616249,0.00083644054,0.0095911985,0.00094543485,0.0016820793,0.003381666,0.0030952503,0.0025501687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003749603,0.00012252221,0.023855012,0.0004045877,0.000025240666,0.0000994427,0.001952381,0.00024558426,0.00013358935,0.010281466,0.9302156,0.032627095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039483813,0.00003742433,0.17698681,0.00038331648,0.00003850416,0.00005521529,0.0049289083,0.00041547627,0.0002824798,0.00086874294,0.8158767,0.00008690611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99841595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1334071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1334071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46317333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9679408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017943822","doi":"","title":"Congratulations to Arnup Cup Winners (&amp; third-year JD students) Bessmah Hamed and Rachel Devon","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Excellence; Economic Justice; Competition (biology); High Court","score_opus":0.09008594255897977,"score_gpt":0.4854879095528478,"score_spread":0.39540196699386804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017943822","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004168284,0.01263683,0.0009058066,0.5711893,0.15171115,0.0003499455,0.0017400013,0.0010290612,0.2562696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007833847,0.0027418665,0.0005067761,0.045095164,0.0057969145,0.00012491594,0.00047837317,0.00026506718,0.93715703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979755,0.00016477825,0.000041636293,0.00021577123,0.0009853328,0.00061701576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990378,0.00015003212,0.00011850151,0.00012791262,0.0023845762,0.0068408283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025981835,0.0009033655,0.0005709635,0.0012483828,0.008880155,0.0052505014,0.0016099764,0.0036234183,0.15156141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004163962,0.0005457204,0.0005079173,0.00046170971,0.0012981552,0.002452833,0.0049695796,0.0056050112,0.06585215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026625473,0.000012954663,0.00007289316,0.0000056021117,2.8362692e-7,0.00001762713,0.000032701566,0.0000034161062,0.000014803002,0.00023215736,0.99685436,0.0027506484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028564205,0.000009129176,0.0005200487,0.000030507588,8.4103715e-7,0.00004476485,0.0005256315,0.000014736758,0.00003767824,0.0001850071,0.9986223,0.0000064145283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07457306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2065948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15156141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063806195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011617855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50702345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017976656","doi":"","title":"Civil Justice System and the Public: Learning from Experiences to find Practices that Work","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Work (physics); Action research; Process (computing); Action (physics); Civil procedure","score_opus":0.04670131189312941,"score_gpt":0.32781093403164413,"score_spread":0.2811096221385147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017976656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6574178,0.011471463,0.011038471,0.11015117,0.0014153476,0.00038622753,0.00007323554,0.00025917953,0.20778713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777029,0.0032117937,0.0030009886,0.004425414,0.0001541464,0.00015236274,0.000029701714,0.000117712996,0.011204938],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94506,0.04513522,0.00057108875,0.0014257742,0.0031586108,0.004649235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735893,0.016891642,0.0012555956,0.0015480821,0.0016084557,0.0051069255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02915461,0.00081498455,0.0009649226,0.0030604328,0.03435698,0.025290933,0.0035105527,0.005576013,0.0054559954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03394498,0.0007150113,0.0005136548,0.0032160075,0.055446398,0.025323967,0.023981158,0.009817685,0.00083083636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008753822,0.00009619984,0.0008491408,0.00006896803,0.0000043019313,0.0003846847,0.96865183,0.000030611795,0.00009628198,0.013544855,0.0032926854,0.012971625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051170714,0.00002936278,0.00025358508,0.0001611175,0.0000028054112,0.00014978269,0.95991844,0.000029727666,0.00006757856,0.0039228178,0.035449054,0.000010641952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016390251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03132874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03435698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01300116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018138578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15418619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018242549","doi":"","title":"The Continuing Application of Gladue Principles in the Professional Discipline of Indigenous Lawyers: A Comment on Law Society of Ontario v McCullough","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Tribunal; Legal profession; Professional association; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04020805784246994,"score_gpt":0.35345743563475945,"score_spread":0.3132493777922895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018242549","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008914764,0.001344183,0.00076904765,0.93236756,0.0016433886,0.000041667437,0.000058543705,0.000043361386,0.054817457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1189014,0.0009827612,0.001384832,0.8100022,0.0015557602,0.00008336907,0.000029972709,0.000056413457,0.06700328],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844751,0.0020781762,0.0006628537,0.0016779887,0.006728788,0.004377172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97825617,0.012081634,0.0012225442,0.0006747958,0.0051533366,0.0026116185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010634511,0.00050065265,0.0008231245,0.0009680239,0.037500914,0.009273107,0.0068192896,0.047087505,0.005061456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03314482,0.0010021877,0.0013911242,0.0016509176,0.029231125,0.0048264153,0.004805151,0.035369806,0.00085522846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004882628,0.00002969603,0.00246432,0.00015832575,0.00001881825,0.001800331,0.044724673,0.00019939386,0.00095030695,0.43623003,0.5062153,0.007159874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065886896,0.000048529168,0.0068464386,0.0005886178,0.00006254684,0.00046883072,0.031886242,0.00047993596,0.00082049164,0.029236225,0.9292687,0.00022746668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9317838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9761297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068216205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05437526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09761795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39452195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018350933","doi":"","title":"The Cost of Experiencing Everyday Legal Problems Related to Social Assistance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social issues; Social justice; Everyday life; Civil society; Social policy; Poison control","score_opus":0.03900529077985031,"score_gpt":0.36508151102778824,"score_spread":0.3260762202479379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018350933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6808858,0.0049704234,0.0011348035,0.08900211,0.0010096285,0.0001912664,0.0027879276,0.00015647465,0.21986154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97001857,0.0034140805,0.0010275363,0.0042695547,0.0001631611,0.00005032533,0.0006196597,0.00003141791,0.020405672],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960355,0.00056899706,0.00013461828,0.00015505498,0.0013198036,0.0017860859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904636,0.00060243806,0.0013468305,0.00019517308,0.0016476252,0.005744334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011592645,0.0002870311,0.00052177923,0.0012191683,0.013711927,0.003912095,0.0017720078,0.001433685,0.03297303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009140913,0.0003167007,0.0006236278,0.0017619721,0.0034492954,0.0017431347,0.006238264,0.0033760718,0.0014833424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019711936,0.0011577207,0.35693306,0.0006509348,0.00036581993,0.0073180534,0.049664542,0.0015207056,0.0008748249,0.031242188,0.19002289,0.36005217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058094705,0.00031312334,0.6174003,0.0019823646,0.00019582783,0.0054346407,0.1549446,0.0017028182,0.00034990878,0.011450599,0.20587073,0.00029701245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8852413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9606732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8852413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028113628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047831237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.230869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019099138","doi":"","title":"Everyday Legal Problems and the Cost of Justice in Canada: Education (Data Report)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sample (material); Legal action; Government (linguistics); Everyday life","score_opus":0.05389804749194087,"score_gpt":0.3540471638283954,"score_spread":0.3001491163364545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019099138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5528596,0.0032222338,0.0002602229,0.004984674,0.00012729084,0.00056520023,0.4112857,0.00009840374,0.02659672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8022335,0.005838872,0.0010759565,0.0009995269,0.0000835804,0.00046509897,0.16835791,0.00004289073,0.02090258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984812,0.000082417944,0.00012507131,0.00008873511,0.0007395083,0.00048306579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931433,0.00028129248,0.0009406661,0.00011314631,0.0039119986,0.0016096163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084035314,0.0003575805,0.00048602626,0.0032030435,0.0023967559,0.001770287,0.0014713851,0.000574661,0.005685373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004953365,0.00042548528,0.0009991513,0.009118065,0.00042861418,0.00078493665,0.0013250496,0.0014192112,0.00070406473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109072076,0.0001796524,0.8923447,0.00024106313,0.00011185966,0.00010545639,0.0010639135,0.00036510383,0.000032794604,0.0004449918,0.0817448,0.023256592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016298867,0.000013409116,0.99003184,0.00007320958,0.000028440563,0.000027305647,0.00092696317,0.00016181926,0.000026578702,0.000035311605,0.008645258,0.000013619006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99893516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038339477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038339477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056961667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27817369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019963439","doi":"","title":"The institutional accomodation of an enlarged Europe","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Economic integration; European union; Customs union; Deep integration; Democracy; Resizing; Trade barrier; Regional integration","score_opus":0.03233797633445077,"score_gpt":0.34634456488461174,"score_spread":0.31400658855016095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019963439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39462078,0.0014974073,0.011594065,0.007688812,0.00039046578,0.000059715312,0.000092663075,0.00017426767,0.5838818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797249,0.00033542374,0.002196193,0.0007607517,0.00010773704,0.000025574125,0.000043711407,0.000023520344,0.016782202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969375,0.0010437093,0.00018771912,0.00052230497,0.00046370804,0.00084496604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969695,0.0007437047,0.0005573539,0.0009375843,0.00039663338,0.00039525927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043345117,0.00019067767,0.0002921857,0.0008039783,0.0020199171,0.005741317,0.0007184216,0.0015657396,0.008440454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008112694,0.00023055947,0.00069921755,0.0007058861,0.0036633324,0.0037809217,0.008445255,0.0018877023,0.00042104878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004607079,0.000023764022,0.0016987334,0.00005385348,0.000020646501,0.00042154465,0.0024894949,0.0015850442,0.00067257945,0.9720929,0.0017450674,0.019150179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001557238,0.00026084276,0.026483232,0.00034715724,0.00011964537,0.0012238992,0.0041032513,0.0047701746,0.0022872908,0.322595,0.63754916,0.000104647865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015792451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022142995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008440454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024851144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002394977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02823615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020172368","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Legal ethics; Password; Work (physics); Legal research; Information ethics","score_opus":0.03550944821039266,"score_gpt":0.3371139079239748,"score_spread":0.30160445971358213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020172368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03330805,0.015275431,0.003347496,0.13758752,0.0045881504,0.0004891994,0.0046679894,0.00058016414,0.80015606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2433709,0.0150760645,0.010166489,0.020614782,0.0005446215,0.00030551193,0.002336724,0.0002964921,0.7072884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868065,0.0001708853,0.000030838495,0.00007978593,0.0006145215,0.00042325543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99413705,0.00042340945,0.000101083286,0.000097472715,0.0020620811,0.0031788754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013507754,0.0003712525,0.00026151424,0.0015228636,0.010948841,0.003820954,0.0009157071,0.0017628361,0.063500606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042432975,0.0003030462,0.00026125982,0.0019675386,0.0026834104,0.0014194692,0.0016136273,0.0023902662,0.005178128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012865304,0.00007165487,0.0012607536,0.00011444411,0.0000026252212,0.00022162161,0.002110621,0.00016049817,0.00020595126,0.019099168,0.9023332,0.07440655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009350172,0.000013360488,0.0070105474,0.00017744873,0.0000032984894,0.00015636024,0.0032634488,0.000200301,0.00011862576,0.0016750267,0.98735166,0.000020630587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97584903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99611145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063500606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057479348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2548531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41704386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020207684","doi":"","title":"Law's Ambition and the Reconstruction of Role Morality\\nin Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Bureaucracy; Identity (music); Jurisprudence; Harm; Alienation; Legal profession; Scrutiny; Ambivalence","score_opus":0.016241933082856097,"score_gpt":0.2881054882130676,"score_spread":0.2718635551302115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020207684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26276496,0.006862779,0.0047704116,0.2746603,0.0013864234,0.00014238885,0.0001514951,0.00012258903,0.44913867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93963957,0.0014285508,0.001112332,0.009641808,0.00006159367,0.000020180993,0.000028728748,0.000041618696,0.048025556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985076,0.002900836,0.00029714362,0.0012717434,0.004782191,0.005672027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875157,0.002483086,0.00080315344,0.0004617586,0.0042979866,0.0044382713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007161598,0.0002281901,0.0003933207,0.0015370359,0.049500573,0.025176946,0.0032360265,0.0048882347,0.004576609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014225254,0.0005471032,0.00034405504,0.0023515653,0.04085674,0.0038852685,0.0074301907,0.009721885,0.00022808788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028967424,0.00003298544,0.004975215,0.00006661412,0.000009177309,0.00054119877,0.05709378,0.0003823219,0.00039058988,0.8855086,0.019755745,0.031214878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035080884,0.0000684892,0.022420613,0.0005270709,0.000032353953,0.00035945678,0.1733279,0.0020741045,0.000858484,0.11535565,0.6847387,0.00020205547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98664224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99426115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25706822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25706822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3605018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8616955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7022296994","doi":"","title":"Student Success","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Center (category theory); Academic advising; Study abroad; Dual enrollment; Higher education","score_opus":0.1501816945407104,"score_gpt":0.4622841575951238,"score_spread":0.3121024630544134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7022296994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26120266,0.00038178486,0.00057762314,0.010079876,0.0011203317,0.0011329586,0.0397344,0.0003766628,0.6853937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5263836,0.0005037516,0.0005017838,0.0035871016,0.00057750393,0.0018178979,0.029924609,0.00017746071,0.43652633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927886,0.000721543,0.00026918852,0.0005944115,0.0025771647,0.0030490141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97685325,0.0012369966,0.0013815484,0.0010504834,0.007856829,0.011620869],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044773784,0.00055902824,0.00076587667,0.004286608,0.0033504902,0.004143266,0.001316791,0.0012288778,0.13562788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009452367,0.00026725212,0.0007718528,0.0023361482,0.0006659895,0.0020466684,0.0043432973,0.0021112685,0.061368193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005510079,0.0013809687,0.27533117,0.00029023062,0.000084955405,0.0001488208,0.004313114,0.00024189198,0.00067331735,0.0058619757,0.58086926,0.13025321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006361179,0.0005936273,0.66846734,0.00024382703,0.000040208277,0.00010701541,0.008521234,0.00017564598,0.0008128181,0.0011999785,0.31970915,0.000065483306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007733532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0220729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86437213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001425072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043199416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45372045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7022402617","doi":"","title":"Judicial Ethics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diligence; Economic Justice; Core (optical fiber); Judicial review; Due diligence; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.06765908636197575,"score_gpt":0.3886267583934941,"score_spread":0.3209676720315183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7022402617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032192124,0.0143611925,0.018026397,0.09022863,0.0020507746,0.00015371872,0.00015279966,0.000108284046,0.87169904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45675933,0.021084879,0.028184848,0.058768857,0.0063882163,0.00054366747,0.0003190499,0.00019590481,0.42775527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98417157,0.007067791,0.0008623666,0.0015189098,0.0048621153,0.0015173504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929422,0.002842661,0.00047657214,0.00084339763,0.0022304442,0.0006647686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009526354,0.00046273237,0.00047336041,0.0012347267,0.0062558623,0.0074310033,0.0011583886,0.005404155,0.008815032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016389051,0.00033768473,0.00036606728,0.00089012284,0.015060833,0.0028984437,0.0028431315,0.005023051,0.003839134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002058535,0.000005162035,0.00009879984,0.00002647989,0.0000018541989,0.00002596938,0.00077756506,0.00006925755,0.000053137424,0.95592403,0.03397153,0.00904419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071456,0.000009060459,0.00032164785,0.00022915291,0.0000029394196,0.00010719429,0.00060066575,0.00013574399,0.000106655054,0.3003606,0.6981103,0.000008801552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053468053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070160204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009526354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006235382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012899624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050380766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023486756","doi":"","title":"Orphans No More: A Review of Elizabeth Sanderson, Government Lawyering: Duties and Ethical Challenges of Government Lawyers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Parliament; Economic Justice; Position (finance); Responsible government; Identity (music)","score_opus":0.037956420503574916,"score_gpt":0.34436962348476985,"score_spread":0.30641320298119495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023486756","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002541224,0.98197144,0.00008682286,0.013366799,0.0022670298,0.0000065886798,0.00001299459,0.0000034052289,0.0020307112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026680846,0.9753084,0.0001726471,0.015878232,0.0023027374,0.00002115965,0.000034312794,0.000011854612,0.0036026523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704736,0.0013458147,0.00023703152,0.00022007548,0.0009983778,0.00015131496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911442,0.006030726,0.00070916634,0.0001349848,0.0016624479,0.0003185283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029903685,0.0005474947,0.0012875765,0.0035438489,0.001296962,0.0036740797,0.0009817844,0.0028838275,0.00268011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011173068,0.0006169945,0.00044677255,0.006157624,0.002710611,0.0057508545,0.0017964579,0.004307716,0.00092916266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054870736,0.000050634888,0.0005121331,0.017470444,0.000094525196,0.00028620253,0.004114456,0.00020074424,0.000336507,0.02512615,0.7298354,0.221918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041952303,0.000022198736,0.0007611868,0.008555601,0.000025212057,0.00018327203,0.001082026,0.00001669525,0.000041945885,0.0014051747,0.9878917,0.000010746347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01218804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03340568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01218804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003561434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009147658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025840163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024083729","doi":"","title":"The relation of McGill University to legal education.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Field (mathematics); Component (thermodynamics)","score_opus":0.009790944703838124,"score_gpt":0.24041480681984476,"score_spread":0.23062386211600663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024083729","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06571497,0.024801394,0.0005384043,0.500118,0.0016052098,0.0000702799,0.001164422,0.00013422479,0.40585303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78397775,0.004794992,0.00068550097,0.04870881,0.00071316276,0.00008136745,0.00012480692,0.00009359434,0.16082008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99339664,0.0019169658,0.00013058945,0.00043021905,0.0015163147,0.0026092597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9493742,0.018991899,0.0036838443,0.0008975733,0.004530249,0.022522274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037185538,0.000152728,0.00025901548,0.0016284379,0.01153527,0.007214069,0.0017562053,0.0057013123,0.080703534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033042997,0.00035389597,0.00031224173,0.0022740576,0.007091672,0.0034778835,0.00559917,0.005043239,0.0022480525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018512085,0.00016292934,0.019877473,0.00031027105,0.000025744155,0.0008259389,0.008672879,0.0002655816,0.00033397312,0.41987416,0.44473013,0.10473583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081093436,0.00011437906,0.19435091,0.0013116337,0.000047642196,0.00036774788,0.011589735,0.00042529404,0.000684471,0.027728915,0.7631477,0.00015043032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78522646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9393196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21477354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04097011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06795084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43207675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024208546","doi":"","title":"RECORD-SETTING CLASS ENROLLS AT UGA LAW SCHOOL","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Class (philosophy); Quarter (Canadian coin); Legal education; Point (geometry); Work (physics); Higher education","score_opus":0.05211043628982902,"score_gpt":0.37220605693301684,"score_spread":0.3200956206431878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024208546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01776825,0.00035440226,0.0005005734,0.0053235,0.0024079895,0.00092712924,0.01070017,0.006255554,0.95576227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025500162,0.00027209273,0.00054334383,0.0027456386,0.0006949882,0.00039491255,0.0034341062,0.00061543833,0.9657993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989467,0.00009673704,0.000038542432,0.00018233967,0.00037175446,0.00036390827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99625933,0.000089890425,0.0001907632,0.00027781518,0.00074297254,0.0024392738],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006209908,0.00085300056,0.0005300531,0.0012442038,0.006816962,0.0033139768,0.0017683535,0.0021096205,0.6750557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024598995,0.0005638717,0.00050680595,0.0009296364,0.0004252156,0.0015825649,0.0035548627,0.0024899985,0.546934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003449566,0.00023758081,0.0018162697,0.00002721627,0.0000014787038,0.00009110587,0.000113810886,0.000008232789,0.00027183548,0.00026872128,0.96221757,0.034911826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000397455,0.00021821346,0.021710966,0.00007880732,0.000006673601,0.0001653547,0.0009007871,0.00008475119,0.00047412454,0.00014977239,0.97614485,0.000025966021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0139072435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056077216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6750557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016762312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002935058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4634936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024714067","doi":"","title":"Sticky Floors, Springboards, Stairways &amp;amp; Slow Escalators: Mobility Pathways and Preferences of International Students in U.S. Law Schools","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Study abroad; Focus (optics); Developing country; Developed country; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.03634673471259693,"score_gpt":0.3149816574544735,"score_spread":0.27863492274187657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024714067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948632,0.00020022978,0.00004132941,0.0005488928,0.000012142367,0.0000072566327,0.000088467736,0.0000040480136,0.0042345254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950304,0.0002946693,0.00006322928,0.00042335287,0.0000048175402,0.000013565352,0.00008659478,0.00000783767,0.0040754043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993037,0.00020275834,0.000044168413,0.000064666616,0.00010631374,0.0002784367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830353,0.0002301439,0.00040537035,0.00003363336,0.00015751024,0.00086982024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009416267,0.0002838536,0.00024238763,0.0010837638,0.0032019978,0.0037089477,0.0004378158,0.00093201903,0.008644112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002480591,0.0003050158,0.00025533387,0.0009063796,0.001571137,0.0024812354,0.0020253584,0.0018083525,0.0016986576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014417202,0.00045152885,0.7318425,0.000042023046,0.000016267995,0.00046069513,0.2249313,0.000103459664,0.00044471768,0.0020450312,0.009764056,0.02975419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010020732,0.00017057637,0.2542447,0.00013351881,0.000013022319,0.00028432012,0.73125875,0.00021349046,0.0001829644,0.000438915,0.013019135,0.000030558254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026002929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0874979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026002929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001002416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011491155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051703155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026706172","doi":"","title":"2007 - A Banner Year","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Banner; Government (linguistics); Commission; Mediation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.029562090233770533,"score_gpt":0.34844625288847514,"score_spread":0.3188841626547046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026706172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00549662,0.0032496732,0.00092547346,0.065829255,0.09332637,0.0005307073,0.009167221,0.0008195832,0.82065517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005825637,0.00052342255,0.0002631716,0.0085573895,0.0016465378,0.00012972494,0.002456586,0.00018799164,0.98040956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977443,0.0001055266,0.000052390722,0.00021837922,0.0010086858,0.0008706908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972561,0.000072720584,0.000048585178,0.00013089157,0.0007347342,0.0017569633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033067458,0.0010594442,0.00087142957,0.0011496055,0.0078402655,0.012459847,0.0019845066,0.0061104787,0.2823332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002983294,0.0006096628,0.00089806423,0.0011850073,0.0013211168,0.0029133388,0.0061753388,0.007062421,0.16057661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036987174,0.00008415661,0.00024086691,0.000022145929,0.0000023649711,0.000048160433,0.000043767053,0.000016585016,0.000118332086,0.0048217927,0.9856807,0.0088841375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010313675,0.000018930175,0.0014844161,0.000021381236,0.0000013347823,0.00000943778,0.00011934678,0.000020988613,0.000056388653,0.00036375757,0.9978877,0.0000059807785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083400466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3234125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2823332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006433636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014917499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94449866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028501972","doi":"","title":"100% of first-gen and veterans receive aid","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Quarter (Canadian coin); Class (philosophy); Legal education; Government (linguistics); Higher education","score_opus":0.04404270461299721,"score_gpt":0.34493138042911553,"score_spread":0.30088867581611833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028501972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17325781,0.013216059,0.0011656602,0.10308518,0.008223633,0.00046951007,0.042463362,0.0014187124,0.6567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2751988,0.012207815,0.0010704498,0.05480575,0.0018837347,0.00038542773,0.02561122,0.00032409097,0.6285126],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833316,0.00013621409,0.000050440718,0.00011763079,0.0007411531,0.00062139693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984642,0.0001003423,0.00019606425,0.00009467378,0.0003360926,0.00080862787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007186921,0.0003039571,0.00028602988,0.0008187044,0.0015661796,0.0014993385,0.00070492615,0.0011683182,0.0852503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002864571,0.00026990418,0.00037716894,0.0010689109,0.00047334598,0.0008605628,0.00223691,0.0018508408,0.031827692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002616431,0.00008178239,0.041382503,0.000071381604,0.000008083295,0.00018575201,0.0003543725,0.000019395438,0.00035724518,0.0027845087,0.8560136,0.09871517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021085918,0.00006135284,0.09868851,0.00019354573,0.000006646879,0.00062682276,0.0016114137,0.00006857856,0.00027483536,0.00068373873,0.89774996,0.000013489479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021690138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040860157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0852503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083017396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2851907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028561618","doi":"","title":"Exploring the Importance of Criminal Legal Aid: A Canadian Perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Criminal justice; Order (exchange); Legal research; Criminal investigation; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.1020561396249394,"score_gpt":0.3583387971762864,"score_spread":0.25628265755134705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028561618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06773118,0.048202023,0.0010000344,0.32605943,0.0009961764,0.00009275052,0.0010645625,0.000041914558,0.554812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85683656,0.07757865,0.002217374,0.022233544,0.0003146693,0.00004163798,0.0003307072,0.000056065786,0.04039078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924245,0.001120238,0.00019038987,0.00043924453,0.0025690382,0.003256696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98921484,0.0024124936,0.0006261606,0.0001703147,0.004644397,0.0029317918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00510364,0.00054644415,0.0007827224,0.0068032965,0.019505765,0.012951787,0.0026571557,0.003288094,0.015155362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013520384,0.00045688413,0.0005614707,0.011905347,0.0128551815,0.004977903,0.004213501,0.005821601,0.0004762845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083976025,0.0000883322,0.015430214,0.00078992784,0.000042287214,0.0011414897,0.022629675,0.0012562207,0.00035961962,0.81417215,0.06390756,0.080098554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053106356,0.00007905733,0.059420377,0.0035695313,0.00014743888,0.0008194297,0.11476167,0.0018994075,0.00045636884,0.06340216,0.7550975,0.0002939155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23726402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23726402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3477277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8846656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028687076","doi":"","title":"Gladue at Twenty: Gladue Principles in the Professional Discipline of Indigenous Lawyers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Discipline; Practice of law; Supreme court; Legal profession; Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Professional conduct","score_opus":0.052248350764250724,"score_gpt":0.3516995180176856,"score_spread":0.2994511672534349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028687076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010460276,0.010753699,0.042310927,0.28385383,0.0045752674,0.0001743694,0.00006964869,0.00020131466,0.6476007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4987615,0.004553621,0.03341918,0.21532114,0.0026375721,0.0006035465,0.000046370562,0.00030823465,0.24434876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98801255,0.0056362427,0.00040691198,0.001403497,0.0030019293,0.0015387286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944148,0.0031093052,0.000330868,0.00054055825,0.00096621667,0.00063824485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011824793,0.0005154526,0.00047188113,0.001382322,0.013496854,0.011363857,0.0028160708,0.014069189,0.006309932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01637105,0.00053261494,0.0008172414,0.00088129746,0.05055817,0.011516418,0.009118646,0.020716876,0.0018643928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065474205,0.000009678159,0.00008967773,0.000032506232,0.0000015409773,0.00006211125,0.009185854,0.000055051823,0.000046979727,0.973959,0.01197658,0.004574432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013777359,0.000025163627,0.00028100252,0.00044038045,0.0000053836134,0.00020949054,0.0048774593,0.00014185252,0.00013815731,0.5592089,0.43462503,0.00003330617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019054523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034979846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98094547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008525016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014488416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06253618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029046282","doi":"","title":"Guthrie's Guide to Better Legal Writing, 2nd ed","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal writing; Legal advice; Advice (programming); Minor (academic); Scope (computer science); Curriculum; Legal practice; Professional writing","score_opus":0.022004331078854602,"score_gpt":0.3461391458057366,"score_spread":0.32413481472688205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029046282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012259237,0.18599935,0.012445244,0.050361842,0.01897827,0.00023823773,0.0012543423,0.0021430182,0.72735375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073674824,0.08518894,0.009888894,0.010349438,0.0023225874,0.0002069835,0.0007830951,0.000947414,0.8829453],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980678,0.00037169558,0.00011719871,0.00019644469,0.0010623396,0.00018456612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856704,0.00060732086,0.00008007153,0.0001091007,0.0004683687,0.00016804636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016179756,0.0009140561,0.00064282335,0.002325551,0.0025032049,0.0074343244,0.0010823455,0.002598958,0.08186212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057910257,0.0008113721,0.00057899137,0.0017867424,0.002128589,0.0059800693,0.002630449,0.0050545447,0.05294866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058836317,0.000012821432,0.000049245475,0.0001309677,0.0000015732318,0.000070270566,0.0008341053,0.000040589315,0.000100563426,0.019633947,0.8761326,0.1029874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011517783,0.0000027836497,0.000074920135,0.00017598738,5.669086e-7,0.00010825499,0.00016196798,0.000013516545,0.00002487783,0.0026785769,0.99675375,0.0000036126523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071897097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017408758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08186212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021569908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006107106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2738561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029637859","doi":"","title":"LEGAL EDUCATION AND LAW: A CASE OF CANADA","year":2019,"lang":"tr","type":"article","venue":"DergiPark (Istanbul University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.009522250236473514,"score_gpt":0.2558627725596811,"score_spread":0.24634052232320758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029637859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6174382,0.003784029,0.0019906953,0.14725971,0.00066226686,0.0002297062,0.00025705202,0.00006268719,0.22831556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92707074,0.0015205398,0.00093426235,0.017718298,0.00009219032,0.00004722503,0.000048555914,0.000041102663,0.052527163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99429566,0.0005190907,0.00007744696,0.000396748,0.0009882621,0.0037228183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99372137,0.0013054018,0.00025886163,0.00011336234,0.0010016961,0.003599325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016480759,0.00053215574,0.0006001024,0.0018080213,0.05901017,0.00834189,0.003507696,0.01959733,0.01293191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067664175,0.0007379544,0.00075195066,0.0042109084,0.011560863,0.002444012,0.00574368,0.015483261,0.00047712837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021030058,0.00086406624,0.044185948,0.00027778876,0.00012175141,0.080344655,0.124730915,0.00321867,0.0013072343,0.608346,0.08760091,0.048791744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002313704,0.00017147402,0.031444874,0.0008402143,0.00025316273,0.014894987,0.3365819,0.006636515,0.0012822056,0.03621281,0.5710421,0.00040836717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99531305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096022576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.096022576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18809736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6966958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029968741","doi":"","title":"The Mismatch Hypotheses in Law School Admissions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Attendance; Affirmative action; Elite; Educational attainment; White (mutation); Ethnic group; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.0354623440364709,"score_gpt":0.3381460775431947,"score_spread":0.3026837335067238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029968741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98263747,0.00010611749,0.003694387,0.0008958575,0.000078292476,0.00011352587,0.00029526936,0.000024816947,0.012154317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960156,0.000023665021,0.00024250991,0.00013129548,0.000037571866,0.000063554144,0.00014408055,0.000006302513,0.0033354545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98538697,0.0050632646,0.0012185664,0.0030648622,0.0032340137,0.0020322837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.892423,0.078531526,0.010545222,0.008402695,0.0032281522,0.006869486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01692847,0.0003815726,0.00091232767,0.0021835526,0.0012913888,0.0029581431,0.001572636,0.0012737602,0.04003735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09023017,0.00043636395,0.0016862112,0.0018286419,0.0033242016,0.0040634633,0.0054815435,0.0027209285,0.0025485817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037479142,0.0011649914,0.931844,0.000079013924,0.00028202435,0.00038507907,0.0033002328,0.0018399999,0.0013858908,0.03145986,0.00076818705,0.023742847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002541199,0.0022094334,0.91814953,0.000036077043,0.00018453052,0.00040863806,0.007203295,0.013241901,0.0020169702,0.05369072,0.0025478003,0.000056942354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002374285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018681536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04003735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012513733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012687716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13393831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030307716","doi":"","title":"Negotiation Ethics: Proposals for Reform to the Law Society of Upper Canada's Rules of Professional Conduct","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Martec (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Legal ethics; Negotiation; Professional conduct; Duty; Legal profession; Supreme court; Settlement (finance); Professional responsibility","score_opus":0.30702448477220223,"score_gpt":0.4478349298923426,"score_spread":0.14081044512014035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030307716","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036462361,0.0075459634,0.01524767,0.83469915,0.0023550277,0.0003606032,0.00004878619,0.00016125928,0.13593529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38608548,0.021926634,0.09946545,0.30761713,0.004367555,0.0016113594,0.00028036273,0.00028826547,0.17835782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9641757,0.012144503,0.00096661673,0.0016955327,0.012464318,0.008553372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96536016,0.007924792,0.0015483656,0.0016369869,0.011588104,0.011941575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04170581,0.0010073147,0.0010286645,0.0042371587,0.02532925,0.0334096,0.007041999,0.024854502,0.008079169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04653228,0.0007044929,0.0013908208,0.003964702,0.06358364,0.013047493,0.010450129,0.018364303,0.0015192963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005749539,0.000040933483,0.00026492297,0.000054081636,0.0000037567495,0.0000764588,0.004484365,0.0003906092,0.00004552719,0.9454395,0.03726983,0.011924292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052382933,0.000028440832,0.0014725011,0.0008647229,0.000018989198,0.000086943095,0.0148504395,0.0017129059,0.00012409681,0.42210445,0.55857956,0.00010454065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8491968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87311065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8525652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14743476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.48911604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7032685407","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Students Learn Role of Public Service in a Legal Career","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Service (business); Work (physics); Public service; Legal service","score_opus":0.038627773165186605,"score_gpt":0.3355333232826571,"score_spread":0.2969055501174705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7032685407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03155324,0.00780664,0.0006950057,0.39105955,0.015680907,0.00017276798,0.0007862745,0.00042395722,0.5518217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06212803,0.006003352,0.0010742903,0.05173128,0.0016133868,0.00011298623,0.0003858428,0.00022454506,0.87672627],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978295,0.00020333209,0.000055046643,0.00020753418,0.00056620175,0.0011383019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98898125,0.0002459695,0.00019520352,0.00018078045,0.00096274796,0.009434016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026093172,0.0006895514,0.00043818424,0.0009664959,0.011794454,0.010330117,0.0009166001,0.004203018,0.114659294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041735093,0.000565746,0.00044160977,0.00054886803,0.005925736,0.0059917304,0.008653213,0.00698772,0.019863704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000115613175,0.00012564451,0.0024061815,0.000047890495,0.0000024144192,0.00021248918,0.0022011462,0.000022950713,0.00012787421,0.009023934,0.95805085,0.027767139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003932479,0.000029407118,0.0021099974,0.00014909533,0.0000016379323,0.0001382335,0.006529683,0.000022096297,0.00006902594,0.0016484269,0.9892898,0.000008569752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0564394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22807288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114659294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006006092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028646577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38357353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7034804437","doi":"","title":"USAi-1 888-879-0163++ Norton 360 support phone number Norton tech support phone number Norton 360 Tech Support Number calli norton support 1-888-879-0163 phone number norton antivirus support custo","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Telephone line; Phone call; Telephone number; Mobile phone","score_opus":0.024346216180854672,"score_gpt":0.3386540684400155,"score_spread":0.3143078522591608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7034804437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005556483,0.00008606349,0.00040176188,0.00019048477,0.0002485233,0.00006875086,0.0011965341,0.0013591306,0.9958931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00048723666,0.00004888426,0.00011529537,0.000044377597,0.000017074091,0.000013109826,0.00039322616,0.00020667308,0.9986743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995426,0.000020478934,0.000014145922,0.00012699631,0.00022964987,0.000066117405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989772,0.00008343327,0.00003912494,0.000098071876,0.00042508723,0.00037704917],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025203338,0.0014546592,0.0008080813,0.001097802,0.0018023985,0.0032254984,0.0012281728,0.0013160821,0.93252426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010292134,0.0007400295,0.0006065123,0.0010062822,0.00039076904,0.001630277,0.0015703801,0.001033435,0.9283001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000632434,0.00011198241,0.00040103705,0.00009872532,0.0000058367577,0.0000923636,0.00007059942,0.0001449937,0.0021523067,0.0015388526,0.9242645,0.07105549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026691856,0.000058933674,0.0009128305,0.000058660426,0.000012356904,0.00010170598,0.000118116644,0.00024821731,0.00065364066,0.00023445093,0.9975623,0.000012107042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018828323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047830284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067475736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011933345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023096732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096245944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039011808","doi":"","title":"Justice Donald McLeod of Ontario Court of Justice to receive Lincoln Alexander Award","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Tribute; Parliament; Governor; Regent; Human rights","score_opus":0.04264721850681745,"score_gpt":0.349375691725173,"score_spread":0.30672847321835556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039011808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035463467,0.0049304795,0.0004615286,0.15929891,0.018288717,0.00021453886,0.0013451149,0.00021946151,0.811695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013789434,0.0013229148,0.00016548487,0.02131139,0.0008910122,0.000031625234,0.0002876512,0.000087800305,0.9621126],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994103,0.00016743847,0.00010775808,0.0004900262,0.0032952751,0.0018364693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924455,0.00020311211,0.000120986995,0.00018560975,0.0037862293,0.0032585375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016906261,0.0006690609,0.0005618337,0.0013027807,0.021316081,0.006405105,0.0012245033,0.0055087125,0.13609155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00751997,0.0005354709,0.00058140635,0.00082198804,0.002527405,0.0016443986,0.0030814589,0.007021444,0.029071659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064068136,0.00000926715,0.0005306195,0.000009368058,0.0000026278042,0.00009997447,0.00018480503,0.000012546301,0.00006263515,0.005673184,0.9890856,0.0043229973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003580191,0.000004016567,0.001731061,0.000030365063,0.000002800851,0.000066677596,0.0003447628,0.000019557538,0.000050490646,0.0003452995,0.99739045,0.000011006488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8642544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9650523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13609155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03386829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0679739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4552716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042262324","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Hall Law School at York University honours outstanding alumni","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Service (business); Public service; Equity (law); Legal service; Key (lock); Real estate","score_opus":0.0387237015264795,"score_gpt":0.3047531607060165,"score_spread":0.266029459179537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042262324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034746632,0.0023919246,0.00029525414,0.016171651,0.004452088,0.00013309252,0.001217193,0.0003478778,0.9715163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003436246,0.00045094758,0.00006295156,0.0006133364,0.000109149725,0.000013668858,0.00014287246,0.000029035577,0.99514186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991242,0.000043636093,0.000026505475,0.00014514643,0.0003774238,0.00028294572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855286,0.00005221402,0.000032463213,0.000061202525,0.0004661545,0.0008350193],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000759181,0.0006592448,0.00031849652,0.00092131423,0.010208553,0.0061352015,0.00067321875,0.0024302758,0.39197463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018220572,0.0005765521,0.00023985877,0.00073852565,0.0013647901,0.0017846691,0.0022353192,0.0031349715,0.095522396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007795653,0.000022361995,0.0006574375,0.000019218875,0.0000010375978,0.00009764553,0.00020323748,0.000011650924,0.00012050877,0.006163094,0.97694266,0.015753381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002289385,0.0000066942553,0.0012989547,0.00003943226,8.0515167e-7,0.00001645916,0.00035215475,0.00001623421,0.000049566654,0.00022047057,0.99799275,0.0000041569106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3112457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69556797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39197463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00927022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013861516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8672744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042332023","doi":"","title":"OsgoodePD hosts IFLP Wave One Launch","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internship; Attendance; Event (particle physics); Process (computing); Principal (computer security); Downtown","score_opus":0.14442126454226967,"score_gpt":0.42228572581533963,"score_spread":0.27786446127306996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042332023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036418606,0.00035789638,0.00168918,0.008149974,0.0036895068,0.0004064081,0.0077046617,0.0059868814,0.9683736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0071258303,0.00018293725,0.0008299223,0.0006272671,0.00029567108,0.000089088,0.0052982527,0.0011505036,0.9844006],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980108,0.000081430706,0.000027116776,0.00020882495,0.0010781162,0.00059374026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923733,0.00018273086,0.00013688911,0.0004212181,0.0019751692,0.004910755],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002328838,0.0008642088,0.00033703682,0.001242693,0.004286284,0.0059670536,0.001147512,0.0017736956,0.65979457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034058301,0.0005849919,0.0003377683,0.0007400178,0.0010389552,0.0025212204,0.004582913,0.002889474,0.33857647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035291112,0.00004943203,0.00030959793,0.000023429337,9.4941305e-7,0.00008429973,0.00010202117,0.000021378417,0.00026742334,0.001382923,0.9821739,0.015549356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008988306,0.00002215075,0.0005890503,0.000012993869,5.2058914e-7,0.000018431238,0.0001871043,0.000054553842,0.000112231595,0.000094923904,0.9988953,0.000003808935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07077607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1840518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65979457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045046215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008333347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48526174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042412619","doi":"","title":"Osgoode leads Canadian law schools with unique micro-courses","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Legal profession; Professional responsibility; Legal practice; Practice of law; Legal research; People skills","score_opus":0.02319303421247269,"score_gpt":0.3247648307351455,"score_spread":0.3015717965226728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042412619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0129681295,0.0019546344,0.0037044873,0.089519285,0.004298105,0.00040211677,0.0022647963,0.0022950314,0.8825934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03073518,0.0009130905,0.004063018,0.012469123,0.00023795421,0.000074983516,0.0008352203,0.00033410147,0.9503373],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407417,0.00020319723,0.00008677954,0.00056289206,0.0029808402,0.0020922248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98191136,0.00040094194,0.00023950962,0.00037565033,0.0052946224,0.011777963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022745943,0.0007178478,0.00029993927,0.0027197096,0.018974122,0.0072615882,0.0015649825,0.0036345394,0.21662824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049630925,0.0009215473,0.00060775666,0.0017467039,0.0040382827,0.0025176709,0.005193358,0.0043400056,0.032942537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021283537,0.00010580485,0.0028787921,0.000043329605,0.0000030829501,0.00012920664,0.0006169974,0.00005857482,0.00057873724,0.013283101,0.91885775,0.0634233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005951603,0.000010153082,0.00303562,0.000029291436,0.000001731541,0.00003385329,0.0005194631,0.00006356245,0.00015913825,0.00035291837,0.99577457,0.000013745939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9084359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98233944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94862914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051370878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17041346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72469366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042435835","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Hall Law School announces new funding for financial accessibility to mark 50 years at York","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Loan; Debt; Student loan; Internship; Investment (military); Student debt","score_opus":0.09162661787453584,"score_gpt":0.3776540544175135,"score_spread":0.28602743654297763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042435835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011826359,0.0031464782,0.0013937069,0.06851337,0.010486876,0.00046192526,0.0047351904,0.0019091127,0.89752704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009687092,0.0004486303,0.00040981878,0.002321457,0.000354511,0.00005336749,0.0007527028,0.00013361897,0.9858387],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981263,0.00009253528,0.00005532072,0.0002090119,0.0009544558,0.0005623478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949438,0.00023330338,0.00012325322,0.00020747067,0.0012818197,0.0032104175],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016774446,0.00048316648,0.0003213627,0.0013059325,0.007110224,0.005438313,0.0007051344,0.004006579,0.37487862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00367231,0.0006289851,0.00045202364,0.00062136736,0.0014178569,0.0023404185,0.0031646865,0.0042107427,0.07049697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021156104,0.00005186705,0.0009290502,0.000021518446,0.0000016076913,0.000096723794,0.00015012408,0.000016445309,0.00028701802,0.0056700995,0.977085,0.015669307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008711373,0.000020860301,0.0031893186,0.000039158003,0.0000017325948,0.000027971812,0.00023790215,0.000034434343,0.00013791508,0.00021894072,0.99607074,0.000012385799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24354167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6006634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75645834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008804407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01812808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8916598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042518312","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Hall Law School Professor Poonam Puri to receive the Law Society Medal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medal; Natural law; Legal history; Common law","score_opus":0.038311461564646744,"score_gpt":0.3506136294819978,"score_spread":0.31230216791735105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042518312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027538843,0.0032388766,0.00035305056,0.21204263,0.008197625,0.00017563571,0.00045025474,0.00032940178,0.77245873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040291506,0.0004854168,0.000085533946,0.004817557,0.00028702806,0.000016975671,0.00004606305,0.000024909514,0.9902074],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788135,0.00016614841,0.00005550407,0.00033500898,0.000981159,0.00058079493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898982,0.0006699275,0.00022276274,0.00021881441,0.002202266,0.006788019],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022596223,0.0004491193,0.0004819115,0.0014854932,0.012063413,0.0069860625,0.0009728539,0.006866099,0.4806297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070200604,0.0006046126,0.00038986822,0.00095610897,0.0026923453,0.002749287,0.0023963614,0.0061803535,0.12604295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008325504,0.00003922402,0.0007842818,0.000017322556,0.0000014815603,0.000094839845,0.00015783285,0.000011167316,0.00009506985,0.007300557,0.9735336,0.0179563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008374618,0.000019430076,0.0017014865,0.00004981832,0.0000020658672,0.00008159268,0.0005062259,0.000035945537,0.000076092205,0.00067103124,0.9968405,0.0000075329704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09566013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37933257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4806297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011644342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02543191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7408187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042531894","doi":"","title":"THE POWER OF LAWYER REGULATORS TO INCREASE CLIENT &amp; PUBLIC PROTECTION THROUGH ADOPTION OF A PROACTIVE REGULATION SYSTEM","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Control (management); Power (physics); Work (physics); Rulemaking; Regulator; Fluid ounce (US); Tying","score_opus":0.04046680023283509,"score_gpt":0.3170177412967738,"score_spread":0.2765509410639387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042531894","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082012355,0.0040883734,0.1239914,0.4427463,0.0015638466,0.0004990548,0.000042755044,0.0013828927,0.34367305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85442656,0.0008546452,0.023679191,0.09900411,0.00094652583,0.00048013957,0.000018746074,0.00011435059,0.020475691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9088738,0.043768957,0.0023543013,0.010632094,0.028043564,0.006327335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8804404,0.07003598,0.012403286,0.012663525,0.017974578,0.0064822775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.063638,0.00041458043,0.0004467651,0.0019219093,0.0078243315,0.01781122,0.003475703,0.013676479,0.0037714897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08327322,0.0011109059,0.0011376245,0.0009192287,0.018598218,0.010931784,0.008924431,0.016208757,0.0011545126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006505865,0.0005210207,0.011651987,0.00025078622,0.00011150062,0.00034277074,0.018845044,0.0021184958,0.0052847383,0.82047415,0.03398982,0.10634459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044279132,0.00083488214,0.015260429,0.0013082266,0.00029694027,0.00074201054,0.010517994,0.010723163,0.010954814,0.41545764,0.5329902,0.0004709084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075185294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009240763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008193147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028017368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33655393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043203441","doi":"","title":"Scholarship at Justice Institute of British Columbia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Ethnography","score_opus":0.01980784260251896,"score_gpt":0.27469679045816714,"score_spread":0.2548889478556482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043203441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0119262105,0.0032767379,0.0002513463,0.06365328,0.0064040828,0.00013182189,0.0041711386,0.0005573076,0.90962803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010230566,0.00047989865,0.000086527194,0.0016142363,0.000121336394,0.000017343325,0.00028691677,0.000051833427,0.9871113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973616,0.0001523483,0.00008212024,0.00034008495,0.001148676,0.0009151269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99112344,0.0005813603,0.00010945861,0.00028996912,0.004529977,0.0033657819],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011584907,0.0006177441,0.00091500283,0.004149734,0.019788424,0.0078258235,0.0018400791,0.0044369,0.33046576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007489476,0.00047114404,0.00037092724,0.0022593366,0.0017620433,0.001775543,0.0037726057,0.004228426,0.05466438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004421832,0.00008799148,0.0014044212,0.00007713864,0.00000765205,0.0003862768,0.0007653663,0.00007195696,0.00017785653,0.017641239,0.9378212,0.04151477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014207633,0.000015284735,0.004631017,0.00014559332,0.000010554925,0.000084679516,0.0014371054,0.0001230573,0.00021515162,0.0016254815,0.9916756,0.00002225866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77530026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93532413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77530026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03216852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08511865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95500934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043281588","doi":"","title":"Should legal professional privilege be absolute: a comparative appraisal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"Scientific Repository (Petra Christian University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Legal advice; Subject (documents); Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Administration of justice; Confidentiality; Legal profession; Absolute (philosophy)","score_opus":0.1460865073040608,"score_gpt":0.4175134390420971,"score_spread":0.2714269317380363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043281588","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022942688,0.7375383,0.0010955931,0.03789601,0.0013532705,0.000118832715,0.00013215242,0.000010216804,0.19891287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5371583,0.4457284,0.0012260037,0.006116987,0.0024436607,0.00013576793,0.00008924842,0.00003156387,0.007070029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.972945,0.011254761,0.0017726365,0.0012093243,0.011817764,0.0010006083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8653503,0.10794964,0.007243778,0.0017846689,0.016265837,0.0014058744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02997094,0.0002736202,0.0011439257,0.010596538,0.003532506,0.00899412,0.0014508056,0.0038992446,0.012030741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11261087,0.00035323817,0.0004684446,0.011160536,0.010700585,0.010817861,0.0024779944,0.0018998004,0.0009962636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002356966,0.00012912885,0.0031987873,0.017776025,0.00014085117,0.00070413813,0.027715797,0.0002265787,0.00051288656,0.60300833,0.028184626,0.31816718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007817015,0.00036327005,0.03581723,0.034637652,0.00034878647,0.0014877653,0.06523306,0.00028285728,0.000650083,0.07193441,0.7890801,0.00008665414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007729743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015486104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02997094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010374328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012645931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15850341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043394301","doi":"","title":"Talking with the Public: The Public, Communication and the Civil Justice System","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Foundation (evidence); Government (linguistics); Social justice; Order (exchange); Civil society","score_opus":0.037943896776235254,"score_gpt":0.29648789687214494,"score_spread":0.25854400009590967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043394301","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07919182,0.020980211,0.0015908536,0.7250662,0.0011912046,0.000045636723,0.000056662397,0.00009214352,0.17178531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94908476,0.007912614,0.0006471852,0.027186869,0.0007443808,0.000045660596,0.000029605144,0.00003995107,0.014308982],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98218095,0.011697689,0.00017962234,0.00040682376,0.0022553508,0.0032797062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98087275,0.009830527,0.0017669443,0.00046287384,0.0014700242,0.0055969004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013561577,0.00030687117,0.0003565409,0.0026208723,0.025901414,0.021895489,0.0013067618,0.008211211,0.013749484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021111647,0.0003260694,0.00028869562,0.0027059165,0.029620824,0.016020697,0.007440371,0.007213233,0.0008959669],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010977123,0.00035061213,0.008718577,0.00038842458,0.000029277031,0.0011441458,0.3698537,0.00025581793,0.00038937625,0.31154257,0.16557573,0.14164199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006480253,0.00014984331,0.015567341,0.0016842309,0.00004548466,0.0006555088,0.5083423,0.00047815833,0.00040755104,0.11892514,0.35355744,0.00012218663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12539563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13042666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12539563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021887574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035972275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24933147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043704403","doi":"","title":"Tracking\\tthe Trends of\\t the Self-Represented Litigant Phenomenon: Data from the National Self-Represented Litigants Project, 2017","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographics; Focus group; Order (exchange); Mediation","score_opus":0.15545203268385666,"score_gpt":0.37924830736951054,"score_spread":0.22379627468565388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043704403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95944005,0.0010698809,0.00042098924,0.0036027513,0.000055482913,0.00034387416,0.025505017,0.000037147118,0.009524898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94712204,0.002914571,0.0012029619,0.0015915923,0.00005371701,0.0011072865,0.033314068,0.00011153524,0.012582238],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957098,0.000558872,0.00032154558,0.00037606256,0.0019610631,0.0010726982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858769,0.0010461867,0.0017717246,0.00050661736,0.00818274,0.0026157885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005615234,0.000212997,0.00036245305,0.004629417,0.0044016945,0.0039453185,0.0015896752,0.00064619654,0.0027408702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011561996,0.00054898136,0.00033813136,0.0077420194,0.0019840053,0.0021654374,0.004993646,0.0022624978,0.0010922186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000857384,0.00012854862,0.7140788,0.0003485301,0.000040293573,0.00052811723,0.18597546,0.000057632842,0.00042445344,0.0014276766,0.058049455,0.038855344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048922147,0.000030006342,0.78718245,0.000315957,0.000009250746,0.00013528857,0.17566162,0.00007795361,0.00025364553,0.000084987194,0.03621647,0.000027375438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8316517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91952914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16834831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01375026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029246459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33867943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043710957","doi":"","title":"Smith-Doheny Legal Ethics Award","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Legal ethics; Legal writing; Legal research; Legal practice; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.07817725767613355,"score_gpt":0.48301902980483824,"score_spread":0.4048417721287047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043710957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003562034,0.0033127072,0.00089020166,0.16722639,0.03396069,0.00028789934,0.0013065508,0.00033014777,0.7891235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058172676,0.0007327008,0.00044842786,0.005123193,0.001833465,0.000063766274,0.00033051506,0.00008152736,0.9855692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99313736,0.00057912135,0.0002113375,0.00045744123,0.004343468,0.001271327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98475075,0.0006184268,0.00022172615,0.0004561699,0.005288545,0.008664297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004885454,0.00087399746,0.00080434844,0.0026095258,0.007127932,0.007876583,0.0011217159,0.004440377,0.25414184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011970863,0.00047724956,0.00059994,0.0011184046,0.0019447106,0.002262345,0.005960501,0.004556369,0.09056087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010893573,0.00002366598,0.00013263448,0.00001438525,0.0000018011298,0.000096357624,0.000044331075,0.00002391927,0.000055307886,0.011445153,0.97397757,0.0141739575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052807873,0.000006454496,0.00040297868,0.00002476981,9.2912524e-7,0.0000404298,0.000062099905,0.0000454304,0.000045032517,0.0013917229,0.9979704,0.000004511649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032491397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10698041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25414184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011705802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03568887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85018915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7046093385","doi":"","title":"The Cost of Experiencing Everyday Legal Problems Related to Loss of Employment and Loss of Housing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Job loss; Legal service; Legal action; Civil rights","score_opus":0.03480891559127124,"score_gpt":0.35279341763024463,"score_spread":0.3179845020389734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7046093385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94856703,0.0043776976,0.00023401208,0.011866527,0.00024250422,0.00009906097,0.0035743993,0.000023848957,0.031014837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99297184,0.0026140194,0.00031681109,0.00092857896,0.00007298032,0.000024639821,0.0011613949,0.000007125157,0.0019025942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585056,0.000639656,0.00026447332,0.00014380946,0.001839296,0.0012622267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99041116,0.0006003366,0.0030765564,0.00020331799,0.0021643718,0.003544296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013885887,0.00022747478,0.0004556824,0.001944582,0.0039935107,0.0020973056,0.0011739447,0.0009084183,0.00579124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012976194,0.0003418887,0.00058410014,0.002580266,0.0017818029,0.0012812945,0.003023636,0.0022115158,0.00035949372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118485834,0.00025128992,0.9009752,0.00024090977,0.00027282853,0.0012121777,0.008502132,0.00046616298,0.00011569279,0.0019263144,0.019590288,0.066328436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008968792,0.0000729478,0.97120583,0.00030490404,0.00004637047,0.00077862304,0.01730668,0.00023817417,0.000034073833,0.0005922337,0.009361182,0.000050105933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69793123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84793335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69793123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010773829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009964364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6076954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066909228","doi":"","title":"Investigating genetic aberrations in metastatic gastric cancer and in primary renal cell carcinoma","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill Genome Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Cancer; Renal cell carcinoma; Metastasis; Gene; Somatic cell; Mutation; Kidney cancer; Germline mutation; Primary tumor","score_opus":0.034773320511871736,"score_gpt":0.314267104014707,"score_spread":0.27949378350283527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066909228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856961,0.0069633503,0.0017585685,0.00023680458,0.00003096186,0.00008469391,0.0014078722,0.00007380641,0.0037479238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981126,0.0065071513,0.0067828675,0.00017912696,0.00002898933,0.000067532244,0.0013587215,0.00003494214,0.0039146296],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997627,0.000023481965,0.000016367872,0.00006763319,0.000099774414,0.000030106847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998109,0.00004531435,0.00004735973,0.000016488453,0.000047702008,0.000032404045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031128194,0.00016515549,0.0002269373,0.0014508333,0.00023105417,0.00035850398,0.0001946646,0.0003450204,0.0022882463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063743786,0.00015185874,0.0003410667,0.0010079497,0.00021862611,0.00018869361,0.00035209692,0.00022711093,0.00042933022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006149666,0.00010316039,0.3535311,0.00084672833,0.00020185625,0.0055298912,0.0008208698,0.0008882205,0.53900003,0.00090237317,0.0020022094,0.09555858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023715298,0.0004787057,0.8561337,0.00009042702,0.00018801818,0.014675955,0.0007818533,0.0009197805,0.11084822,0.00093492714,0.014899591,0.000025003452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017925553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039019089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022882463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004052136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034172402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007654965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067035755","doi":"","title":"La pratique rebelle du droit dans les facultés de droit québécoises : un cadre d'enseignement clinique alternatif","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Archipelago (Université du Québec à Montréal)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.01209868251711465,"score_gpt":0.24484515808408128,"score_spread":0.23274647556696662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067035755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45704085,0.023482464,0.0058437176,0.27458167,0.00084897404,0.0002335672,0.0002989536,0.000118481345,0.23755129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9349948,0.004301209,0.0013466985,0.01063887,0.00006372936,0.00007150281,0.00006124714,0.000037264726,0.04848455],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671835,0.0013728047,0.00006711039,0.00029470507,0.00047901913,0.0010679181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99335665,0.0015747383,0.000495885,0.00024458236,0.0021088591,0.0022191894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052480116,0.0003242321,0.00040485218,0.001210883,0.0155647565,0.0074489824,0.001977741,0.003220792,0.011102337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007146709,0.00031496154,0.00026299848,0.0017317614,0.016484402,0.0040461035,0.0047425586,0.0057400404,0.0005011095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008537719,0.00013642326,0.035230685,0.00056034484,0.00004413119,0.0011630553,0.43984058,0.0009993077,0.0013164307,0.37402406,0.046657473,0.09994206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036143036,0.00012183161,0.0719007,0.0022410017,0.000054616008,0.00031856474,0.39893115,0.0012915988,0.00072478317,0.021891698,0.50231403,0.0001738647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9606261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08944598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08944598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1259635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64897907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067480187","doi":"","title":"McMurtry Visiting Clinical Fellowship Another First in Experiential Education at Osgoode Hall Law School","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Mentorship; Curriculum; Honour; Experiential education","score_opus":0.05372560965777874,"score_gpt":0.38891670494437497,"score_spread":0.33519109528659624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067480187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05112134,0.0060489583,0.004535609,0.32640204,0.028503107,0.00083495403,0.0015650275,0.001518282,0.5794708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07235647,0.0015422419,0.0026800376,0.019142602,0.00096302695,0.00019823025,0.0005342608,0.00019114498,0.9023921],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694926,0.00036964135,0.00006920458,0.00036561492,0.0009890685,0.0012573152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767106,0.0003641924,0.00017850833,0.00038575527,0.002303394,0.020057518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024611626,0.00046525252,0.0003510008,0.00083777943,0.00839884,0.0041270386,0.001316885,0.0027557951,0.17844339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004642657,0.00049336674,0.00046201702,0.0004284042,0.0030983433,0.0015547674,0.005864538,0.0060187704,0.01836901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007267617,0.00021428884,0.0017151472,0.000046343517,0.000007184869,0.0006782759,0.0014301476,0.00006001857,0.0010043575,0.0052212244,0.9408595,0.04869083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002712837,0.000091835995,0.0046082907,0.000114991235,0.0000030806693,0.00045191107,0.0023854603,0.00009051323,0.00029329196,0.00065285264,0.99124885,0.000031826054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11187954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4189045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17844339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012387371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041868865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59695256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070641044","doi":"","title":"Private Lines of Credit for Law Students and Medical Students: A Canadian Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Debt; Legislation","score_opus":0.03970751450400037,"score_gpt":0.4129046680962798,"score_spread":0.37319715359227945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070641044","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13333397,0.008629832,0.0011659432,0.524894,0.0010833823,0.00015221282,0.0011788546,0.000043013268,0.32951874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8580066,0.009099494,0.0008773259,0.047520522,0.00075205864,0.000098533725,0.00047324254,0.00008525367,0.083086915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847655,0.0023259742,0.00030525454,0.0008627553,0.0036752503,0.008065335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.931867,0.010300911,0.0029845499,0.00096563075,0.017444309,0.03643753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008429027,0.00061931345,0.0012446749,0.0060319323,0.04119614,0.022121385,0.0050699995,0.013872406,0.028969899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039167434,0.0008706959,0.0009615266,0.008738773,0.014418908,0.009131374,0.007072335,0.013999795,0.0010086562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023968061,0.00081867486,0.050048824,0.00017974162,0.00004843178,0.0011298339,0.03685569,0.00080260367,0.00030743142,0.644886,0.1904508,0.074232236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024664385,0.00021093106,0.19006418,0.0023530666,0.00014428666,0.0005106871,0.20767343,0.0021165225,0.00034480458,0.07046915,0.5254768,0.00038948114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99105185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18820614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18820614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32965294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9415658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070722958","doi":"","title":"One Year of Law School Credit","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Work (physics); Constitutional law; Common law","score_opus":0.03591264089864942,"score_gpt":0.33066824567556535,"score_spread":0.2947556047769159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070722958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033315133,0.00072557974,0.0025398266,0.018568244,0.008519293,0.0025305182,0.012617991,0.008125274,0.9130581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028985772,0.00039257202,0.0009738613,0.0041797254,0.001210848,0.0007275238,0.009008434,0.0003690758,0.9541523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693066,0.00020260681,0.00016679402,0.00029905446,0.00092983403,0.0014711528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97948384,0.00027657935,0.000408804,0.0011179033,0.003821776,0.014891111],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025088477,0.0017375819,0.0026475226,0.003967873,0.008391175,0.007642879,0.003315645,0.0042299097,0.655471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006973008,0.0010339007,0.0010538694,0.0017259095,0.0009849243,0.0032230571,0.010596453,0.0039944667,0.5739355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023278457,0.0022838935,0.0016115024,0.00005378133,0.000006477372,0.00016615687,0.00012667097,0.00008726758,0.00069615175,0.0017176896,0.9128278,0.08018984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002852217,0.0013340118,0.03502364,0.00014462482,0.000014538726,0.0002897127,0.0012671129,0.00044732296,0.0005885518,0.002042212,0.9585062,0.000056926514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009412038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031260043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.655471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015882773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068743494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49142873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071279485","doi":"","title":"Social and Economic Adversity Experienced by Canadians and Everyday Legal Problems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social justice; Social issues; Social policy; Everyday life","score_opus":0.02277721156648885,"score_gpt":0.3137092889428574,"score_spread":0.2909320773763685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071279485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884488,0.0004506081,0.000043341457,0.0018401543,0.000028187955,0.000027396574,0.00032249317,0.000004173443,0.008834864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830556,0.0004912859,0.00004997802,0.00022946543,0.0000080697755,0.000009133429,0.00013847348,0.0000032913003,0.000764605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964676,0.0005210059,0.0001237756,0.00022308456,0.0010875852,0.0015769592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99364203,0.00051310286,0.0012870183,0.0001369737,0.0013569718,0.0030639353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015567902,0.00028502377,0.00053701806,0.0027467571,0.019048886,0.0043634675,0.0013143277,0.0007526962,0.0033582968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006736778,0.00040618997,0.00039111546,0.004726704,0.006641506,0.0013908083,0.006541685,0.0023874387,0.00012449348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074146934,0.00015842819,0.5707012,0.000107824526,0.0000749611,0.001284216,0.3980625,0.00027075034,0.00021968153,0.0028229936,0.005734943,0.020488279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061311484,0.000038035003,0.47550723,0.00015384697,0.000017770057,0.00029977594,0.51180923,0.00014232736,0.00005053555,0.00026107006,0.011635646,0.00007842625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9868851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037214886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037214886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038250938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27001417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071335482","doi":"","title":"Social, Economic and Health Problems Associated with a Lack of Access to the Courts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Process (computing); Social issues; Health problems; Legislation","score_opus":0.09216274526292727,"score_gpt":0.39135271409296835,"score_spread":0.29918996883004106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071335482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96788085,0.0025902484,0.00019310568,0.0074358475,0.000077786826,0.000040247345,0.00051603717,0.0000072397675,0.021258602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971072,0.0010412576,0.00014564075,0.00031250317,0.000060417413,0.000008228283,0.00012219047,0.000001954269,0.0012006451],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821544,0.00061016675,0.00014922979,0.000087176544,0.00043372755,0.00050426763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869421,0.0019837262,0.0071893097,0.00036435213,0.00128081,0.0022397921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012094382,0.00014520827,0.00023073386,0.002254699,0.002911907,0.001510213,0.00045256127,0.000851594,0.011989918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010453971,0.00015296527,0.0002656694,0.0018375552,0.0021768122,0.0010664663,0.0016537524,0.0020842557,0.00051494775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005587945,0.00034252714,0.97940284,0.00004360392,0.000043276927,0.0017415737,0.0008984903,0.00010911614,0.00013536809,0.002220658,0.0013386796,0.013667906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042462248,0.00013024482,0.981461,0.00009213098,0.000029936517,0.004907938,0.0070138164,0.00021085751,0.000082146966,0.0017317916,0.004318142,0.000017754686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018214911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034870688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018214911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012050046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015465454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04011029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071505723","doi":"","title":"The sea coast resorts of eastern Maine, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Cape Breton.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cape; Nova scotia; West coast; Nova (rocket); Sea coast","score_opus":0.010741166629984297,"score_gpt":0.23778256879133441,"score_spread":0.2270414021613501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071505723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08657434,0.0078892205,0.00070845144,0.006633978,0.0029402985,0.0005600273,0.023556398,0.00051070977,0.87062657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06987135,0.0023080336,0.0005619602,0.0011177405,0.00003860151,0.0000983176,0.0036831747,0.000092286,0.9222285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986935,0.0000052799637,0.0000038914413,0.000017212456,0.000028474426,0.000075724325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958926,0.000013823438,0.000028352495,0.000016830063,0.00017426975,0.00017756598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009804151,0.0005037044,0.000239191,0.0007401317,0.003559117,0.001464361,0.00046897828,0.00034883714,0.112790056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045622283,0.00025655964,0.00015962082,0.0012808735,0.0006007651,0.00047869157,0.0010848468,0.0006337898,0.019985698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105806255,0.00005879813,0.036861595,0.00020009092,0.00001828565,0.0012937378,0.0015780729,0.0001982812,0.0018561335,0.0048333863,0.82770294,0.12529296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023857336,0.000017264974,0.13058369,0.00028112272,0.000008103614,0.00025247812,0.006789177,0.00008693018,0.00019480863,0.00025955183,0.86147904,0.000024068631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93282086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99210733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112790056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070949644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015793148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3773203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072238920","doi":"","title":"Where Are We Going? The Past and Future of Canadian Scholarship on Legal Ethics for Government Lawyers","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Scholarship; Strengths and weaknesses; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.05960965493264662,"score_gpt":0.33845792100957817,"score_spread":0.27884826607693153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7072238920","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022775685,0.13662708,0.003307578,0.66741776,0.0026895124,0.000028451184,0.00015827717,0.00008636647,0.16690923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.793947,0.11112554,0.0062061595,0.0405557,0.0015437226,0.00006280456,0.00012651036,0.00013487355,0.04629765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804961,0.0054219025,0.0004342149,0.001348306,0.00764364,0.004655781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969024,0.0090843,0.0016105962,0.0012629079,0.012642021,0.0063761943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013756358,0.00063631585,0.0009939262,0.0059699025,0.032557875,0.027532086,0.0029181726,0.004908095,0.007292259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025968825,0.00043036524,0.00056247285,0.010086663,0.05661193,0.011451165,0.007041976,0.008573914,0.00070157106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037575435,0.000021682921,0.0020883358,0.000445022,0.00001547817,0.00012460738,0.04006392,0.00026803717,0.00015949828,0.84310454,0.048047554,0.06562365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000149109155,0.00002427622,0.0074105375,0.0021814592,0.000032065036,0.0001298031,0.075826384,0.0005534472,0.00024415355,0.18758576,0.7258859,0.000111255205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9703578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9831648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7459613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2540387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35486984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8652094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093388594","doi":"","title":"In Brief","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Tribunal; The arts; Law library; Internship; Legal education; Class (philosophy)","score_opus":0.053400833042335186,"score_gpt":0.4113521397460682,"score_spread":0.35795130670373304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093388594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029085728,0.0025552893,0.0007164299,0.012647977,0.030351166,0.00031630392,0.0027142416,0.0011255905,0.94928217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00097528094,0.0010143672,0.00022729981,0.0038591323,0.0026666082,0.00007152156,0.0008452642,0.0001685038,0.9901721],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889576,0.00010711292,0.000073812014,0.00020015374,0.0005882818,0.00013488323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711585,0.00024929925,0.0001048466,0.00026986052,0.0014712648,0.0007887868],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080316584,0.0008375722,0.0006588632,0.0012624305,0.002200605,0.0058156075,0.0014652978,0.0031849637,0.8439284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004837277,0.00040233275,0.0005012144,0.0010345363,0.00041977855,0.0037510544,0.002617889,0.002263274,0.78027725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008711678,0.000016851525,0.000068805544,0.000059110287,9.281756e-7,0.000028174069,0.000016687314,0.000007221223,0.000072371455,0.00114433,0.95900756,0.039569285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024179124,0.0000068722834,0.00010828971,0.000031067444,7.6747244e-7,0.000031579508,0.000027613492,0.0000048755956,0.000025575935,0.00024786932,0.9995116,0.0000015195143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018949592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004554609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1560716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012806754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003574887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094500861","doi":"","title":"Reforming Ontarioâs Family Justice System: An Evidence-Based Approach","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Face (sociological concept); Public policy","score_opus":0.10527516500801436,"score_gpt":0.30914356931419057,"score_spread":0.2038684043061762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094500861","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1143566,0.12844107,0.019341262,0.41579705,0.0021160636,0.009746358,0.0049349903,0.00020305376,0.30506358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83664644,0.0794211,0.054299373,0.016642924,0.00042824342,0.0034851173,0.0009721361,0.000028904762,0.008075719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9659132,0.017758807,0.0017602708,0.00123159,0.010935322,0.0024009245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9158873,0.049445823,0.00650484,0.0029517205,0.022774473,0.002435863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055676445,0.00068860804,0.001158813,0.008479573,0.008352274,0.008480855,0.005092517,0.004670346,0.004526968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10419187,0.00063579844,0.0008995493,0.008070625,0.008268325,0.0055856486,0.0052231303,0.0044209696,0.00021689349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032067948,0.0007811966,0.053717382,0.022883646,0.00066019275,0.001020258,0.016718097,0.009517499,0.0005915069,0.5805192,0.051009543,0.26226085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011783625,0.0011178281,0.11339076,0.09988743,0.0029981504,0.0002761059,0.06304034,0.0113799395,0.0020767967,0.17955741,0.5247734,0.00032352784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8653213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9447094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13467872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12346501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3299459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89580554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094505303","doi":"","title":"In Brief","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Gray (unit); Graduation (instrument); Legal education; Higher education; Schedule; Commission","score_opus":0.0470361165926436,"score_gpt":0.4124711099664566,"score_spread":0.36543499337381297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094505303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003219814,0.0019299606,0.0007380391,0.014309903,0.027139235,0.00031332282,0.0029631245,0.0012702215,0.95101416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010526446,0.0007837794,0.00020969244,0.004282115,0.0024431914,0.000069087,0.000862843,0.00018187563,0.9901148],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989104,0.00010573258,0.00007176255,0.00021170538,0.0005625825,0.00013777483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970835,0.00028201067,0.0001057537,0.00026919195,0.0014458402,0.0008136587],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076660793,0.0008298585,0.0006656459,0.0012889943,0.0024564222,0.0058907256,0.001474741,0.003438666,0.85929227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049325973,0.0004293564,0.00049949007,0.0010334374,0.0004347322,0.0038566606,0.00258389,0.0024326073,0.77975184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000924948,0.000017189755,0.000072834366,0.000048809132,8.308106e-7,0.000029419914,0.000017937033,0.0000074487407,0.00006572203,0.0010876622,0.9641951,0.034447823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030058843,0.0000071947566,0.00011475637,0.00002894296,7.834589e-7,0.00003329882,0.00003362245,0.000006598786,0.000026408465,0.00027920058,0.9994646,0.0000016832354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020573314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004885292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14070773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013687825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033591383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094531802","doi":"","title":"on Lenzner '04 Appointed Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.042112390132274816,"score_gpt":0.33935225375913897,"score_spread":0.29723986362686416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094531802","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020762485,0.008461662,0.0013159751,0.46841154,0.05484479,0.00049830356,0.0016601267,0.00071346026,0.4433317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020495819,0.0007654303,0.00043287352,0.033234365,0.0010472427,0.000100696314,0.00017910652,0.000055185817,0.9436893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814975,0.0001266783,0.000058231763,0.00032089656,0.00065411977,0.0006904844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982322,0.00022878606,0.000052524327,0.000051157996,0.00074019976,0.00069520646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001291219,0.00047453438,0.00044524155,0.00112415,0.012400568,0.006353279,0.0011548277,0.005563764,0.047695007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044433735,0.00052940147,0.00032517593,0.0006180616,0.0019405625,0.0015158238,0.00266594,0.009365804,0.010718085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021236507,0.00003507675,0.00062488444,0.000011463701,0.0000019913327,0.00014513626,0.00016425546,0.000033439555,0.00017258007,0.007707225,0.98044956,0.010633202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000867681,0.000030959116,0.0018509687,0.000046248537,0.000003664191,0.00003927609,0.0007429596,0.00009191324,0.00022111191,0.0005599119,0.99638736,0.00001709001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16983739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43143913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16983739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074214605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014172759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33769763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094752365","doi":"","title":"Criminal Law: Canadian Law, Indigenous Laws & Critical Perspectives","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Criminalization; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Prison; Mental health; Poverty","score_opus":0.04254389750772586,"score_gpt":0.36088963919654404,"score_spread":0.3183457416888182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094752365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038923738,0.041130837,0.0013811433,0.10489801,0.0041439855,0.00011379013,0.00051527447,0.00024045804,0.84368414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.106967635,0.06345056,0.0043755984,0.021261433,0.0011600037,0.00017091651,0.0005596702,0.00028357375,0.80177057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979113,0.00019885559,0.00004106201,0.0001364598,0.001152425,0.000560012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707806,0.0004824488,0.00008422662,0.00009930864,0.0014265976,0.0008293486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001868055,0.00081637007,0.0003845435,0.004032003,0.020759556,0.010971254,0.0016689292,0.0030184845,0.040250707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044223126,0.0004096344,0.00025897572,0.0074870125,0.01597583,0.0040451316,0.0026396925,0.003857657,0.0039119464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004611455,0.00002199081,0.000340124,0.00022001246,0.0000023980722,0.00015682894,0.015524734,0.000095846946,0.00016743032,0.09718314,0.8090128,0.07727013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.3181063e-7,0.0000014590984,0.00071190175,0.00015280886,0.0000014441596,0.000041809653,0.0060298904,0.000022521772,0.000030937597,0.0029789405,0.99001837,0.000009012305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97924334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11371135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11371135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19193664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8250375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095253457","doi":"","title":"LSAC RESEARCH REPORT SERIES � Predictive Validity of Accommodated LSAT Scores for the 2002–2006 Entering Law School Classes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Accreditation; Longitudinal study; Predictive validity","score_opus":0.22437028711180823,"score_gpt":0.4936011573379955,"score_spread":0.26923087022618725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095253457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97373295,0.00015138951,0.00044639295,0.0007401748,0.00023266347,0.00023665013,0.015997538,0.000075903845,0.008386356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758129,0.00016099527,0.000772472,0.00016633773,0.00009132454,0.0004066092,0.017577784,0.000057166282,0.004954284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977101,0.0007140788,0.00024861682,0.00034721062,0.00077925203,0.00020069059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730258,0.0062990277,0.0051453793,0.0016762273,0.010559269,0.0032943743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050133327,0.00042669085,0.00038638394,0.002716879,0.0012949599,0.0015642487,0.0017005653,0.0008485342,0.007722238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02075553,0.00045032802,0.0008842065,0.002012968,0.0005124286,0.0012731665,0.0009970792,0.0018806575,0.00262293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055218676,0.00018546711,0.9880334,0.000011572598,0.000037250145,0.00001675825,0.0002915899,0.00012862206,0.00003335864,0.00010558169,0.007331793,0.0037694348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017720084,0.00010863392,0.996651,0.00002271421,0.000027958868,0.000044654287,0.0005006712,0.0005564043,0.00008164955,0.00006955628,0.0019083255,0.000010648352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09236775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11297197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09236775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017317729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029855599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18366027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095524496","doi":"","title":"� LSAT Listening Assessment: Theoretical Background and Specifications","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Corporation; Active listening; Voting; Legal education; Public law","score_opus":0.1341573661874814,"score_gpt":0.4396917456960025,"score_spread":0.30553437950852114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095524496","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058753222,0.0011496054,0.56568354,0.008281943,0.00018479505,0.0039543943,0.0030637933,0.0008897523,0.35803905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.595174,0.001585458,0.36674196,0.0011503266,0.00014820992,0.011136064,0.0035526277,0.00024341789,0.020267945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928067,0.0025126522,0.0008008315,0.00091390166,0.002549951,0.0004158607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97927105,0.012085488,0.0018145329,0.0011925787,0.0049613738,0.0006749733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076622665,0.0009834054,0.0005749492,0.003946764,0.0017707624,0.006565696,0.0027685093,0.0021404242,0.028222544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028632695,0.0010837668,0.0011144599,0.004566489,0.0048153526,0.007597991,0.003531828,0.0022305578,0.0055666403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007221678,0.00036260625,0.015304129,0.0005078259,0.000024992394,0.00021717962,0.0034087577,0.0032274807,0.00057906995,0.8885894,0.0056832056,0.082023226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014039705,0.00024736935,0.025705168,0.0012400771,0.00012900008,0.00075618504,0.01338952,0.058530502,0.0019191988,0.826572,0.071238354,0.00013231816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009910909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028222544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00647106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073207757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09441376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095849741","doi":"","title":"� Fear of Falling: The Effects of U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report Rankings on U.S. Law Schools","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Discretion; Public law; Accreditation; Common law; Law reform","score_opus":0.04682434543987745,"score_gpt":0.38997320917765893,"score_spread":0.3431488637377815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095849741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80049545,0.0033467067,0.00020989371,0.09772712,0.00077231316,0.00006165741,0.00624334,0.0001621449,0.090981476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877297,0.00080957636,0.00006250604,0.00429027,0.0001389899,0.000037280166,0.0014163167,0.000035165016,0.005480238],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543935,0.0012634606,0.00021960385,0.0002021884,0.0014951515,0.001380186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745395,0.004539426,0.0077820225,0.00043377178,0.0044799238,0.008225359],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033161414,0.00024611453,0.00030900224,0.0023638178,0.0031315933,0.004602657,0.00096370984,0.0015403463,0.01620202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017787594,0.0002655443,0.00062749506,0.0039933138,0.0015466514,0.0017546245,0.0024290448,0.002740796,0.0019607486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003604579,0.0005243534,0.6160975,0.00007190266,0.000059923284,0.00016764551,0.004474544,0.00031064806,0.00005377019,0.004051296,0.30906233,0.0647657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034022236,0.00017915905,0.95212674,0.00018977474,0.000033599805,0.00007027347,0.023865048,0.00032321506,0.000109164655,0.00080094824,0.022226095,0.00004185525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2298157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3828533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99668384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051430063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049164346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4569561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096165303","doi":"","title":"Canadian Forum on Civil Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.10299123569326385,"score_gpt":0.409955210299924,"score_spread":0.30696397460666014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096165303","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013958341,0.05992303,0.00045032773,0.44553703,0.063433826,0.00020936983,0.0035408083,0.00020972354,0.42530003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031148346,0.020906188,0.0013052232,0.10662293,0.011316192,0.00021592747,0.0014519999,0.00021559496,0.82681763],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800709,0.0010858946,0.0005492288,0.0009009176,0.01126174,0.0061313948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98556685,0.0020478792,0.0003843214,0.0007251633,0.006956159,0.004319657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008457819,0.0025646312,0.0019122853,0.0068896017,0.021885749,0.02281232,0.006099695,0.042662703,0.091917925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02177069,0.0012302077,0.0024603012,0.006722152,0.0092342775,0.00494688,0.0074374983,0.017972967,0.011260604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009846591,0.000016922198,0.00007006555,0.00006608574,0.0000056387025,0.000042931468,0.00016320057,0.00006932327,0.000032437725,0.037244335,0.9575129,0.0047661914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009183453,0.000002391971,0.0005362598,0.00012833359,0.0000052065548,0.000011802464,0.00032026158,0.00003467637,0.000026073572,0.0028901622,0.99601597,0.000019747393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9584365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9722055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09521142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09521142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3585494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69081044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096239523","doi":"","title":"American Bar Foundation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Corporation; Work (physics); Bar (unit); Corporate law","score_opus":0.04508817845141043,"score_gpt":0.4353904496805197,"score_spread":0.39030227122910927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096239523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042926098,0.002251348,0.000354488,0.01176492,0.004495936,0.00003512043,0.0009002545,0.0002725224,0.9794962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002118439,0.0013052427,0.00024310655,0.0015976762,0.00042091776,0.000021390018,0.00051289576,0.00008585408,0.9936945],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844724,0.000083948195,0.00005856249,0.00026757442,0.0009305622,0.00021218152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764085,0.000186231,0.00008839735,0.0002444876,0.0013935447,0.00044644086],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010166087,0.00063382246,0.00046531393,0.002068212,0.003800163,0.005170178,0.000981169,0.003732763,0.55538404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038776775,0.0004180247,0.00035173187,0.001636811,0.00076908624,0.002202869,0.0023513609,0.0031352902,0.36841133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011845477,0.00003380215,0.00018744911,0.00003443805,0.0000020109817,0.000062374056,0.000043972435,0.000019153409,0.00010348637,0.019999942,0.90702343,0.07247801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015148037,0.000003201843,0.00022670263,0.000031514955,7.779091e-7,0.00002575089,0.000019585948,0.000012096461,0.000017941686,0.0006103536,0.99904877,0.0000017957457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012100887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028530087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55538404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022021437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005312863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6341907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096496586","doi":"","title":"The PIAC project research team consists of the following members:","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internship; Government (linguistics); Task (project management); Variety (cybernetics); Subject (documents); Research program","score_opus":0.36847337550027565,"score_gpt":0.5549110713269271,"score_spread":0.18643769582665143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096496586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03203158,0.0014322648,0.17027377,0.04232548,0.019919517,0.15207271,0.09410167,0.019678948,0.4681641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062844954,0.0008762379,0.13630348,0.00574298,0.0019277362,0.14186065,0.030235866,0.0040244274,0.61618364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884801,0.004975803,0.0009767761,0.0012109873,0.0035558308,0.0008005584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90198106,0.009826991,0.0027501388,0.009892718,0.059572447,0.015976591],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028274411,0.0008058206,0.0008000935,0.003916419,0.005435345,0.0060675126,0.0019700506,0.0016029006,0.2891168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06465822,0.0011286443,0.00029688916,0.0028340681,0.0010079935,0.0029565645,0.0045473054,0.0033876237,0.25332454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017214016,0.00018436355,0.0013382166,0.00018593043,0.0000029848516,0.00005733604,0.0020601477,0.00011672272,0.00059618265,0.002639348,0.8950322,0.097614445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036764246,0.00015335085,0.0022461996,0.00015698312,0.000003246391,0.00005082997,0.003473348,0.0004821059,0.00039321385,0.00088440435,0.9920974,0.000022097322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004806004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057091922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7108832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003132877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020495944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96719205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096571373","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Corporation; Table of contents; Voting; Table (database)","score_opus":0.08352293535879743,"score_gpt":0.41309412692643327,"score_spread":0.3295711915676358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096571373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045236215,0.002953428,0.0012564095,0.006116273,0.020230418,0.0003966402,0.013328429,0.0013528886,0.9539132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018110998,0.002575274,0.00069810206,0.0021692829,0.0057334206,0.00013232307,0.009409685,0.0004946861,0.9769761],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990452,0.00009932045,0.00006493845,0.00016972008,0.00053728465,0.0000836378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995353,0.0004912431,0.00019953118,0.00035645257,0.0028037329,0.0007960685],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073244754,0.0007941505,0.0008996101,0.0040344857,0.0018820757,0.0062155374,0.0012832577,0.0013629996,0.79777914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006088829,0.00036229796,0.00049447315,0.0035463583,0.00043192026,0.002846647,0.001784039,0.001536259,0.7094146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008035606,0.000019029687,0.00012416526,0.00008875748,0.0000012811499,0.000016013144,0.0000140283455,0.000025799149,0.00009201606,0.0012028755,0.96648115,0.031926773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023174316,0.0000080241525,0.00034744604,0.00009531922,0.0000015632343,0.000030675237,0.000027353413,0.000024648201,0.000046279198,0.00042449616,0.99898857,0.0000032331834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034891295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042967433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20222086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020462691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032845875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2884435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096642171","doi":"","title":"BARBARA ARMACOST ∑ Appreciating the Impacts and Limits","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regent; Chose; Working life; Practice of law; Common law; Labour law","score_opus":0.12309078004496407,"score_gpt":0.4266686275429229,"score_spread":0.3035778474979588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096642171","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004638003,0.045106865,0.0005250221,0.842787,0.012387002,0.000012925172,0.000052946823,0.000064403066,0.09442576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12558712,0.04394749,0.0014743357,0.3673612,0.008152039,0.00007238383,0.00010053094,0.00019062743,0.45311427],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969451,0.000998126,0.00006786162,0.0003864849,0.001190685,0.00041170305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935582,0.0022496586,0.00029058004,0.00019753721,0.0018326993,0.0018713919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028231025,0.00033617584,0.0002487378,0.0008140237,0.008305545,0.0072430596,0.00085341075,0.0034345165,0.0123451315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012725067,0.0003417652,0.00016626646,0.0005471339,0.003253617,0.0033964652,0.0029720173,0.00809298,0.0031078453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008099527,0.000011730313,0.0007628818,0.000042140764,0.0000036670694,0.00012506988,0.0013453631,0.000033953926,0.00016153898,0.013592625,0.9660388,0.01787415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001533229,0.0000061413325,0.0010131949,0.00019743062,0.0000030772344,0.00016819214,0.002123143,0.000035515266,0.0001064246,0.0028179875,0.99351656,0.000010743564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05118023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098564275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05118023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056252936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008460994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10176468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096832485","doi":"","title":"� A Report on the Inclusion of Diverse Speakers on the LSAT Listening Comprehension Assessment: A Survey of the Literature with Recommendations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Voting; Active listening; Legal education; Corporation","score_opus":0.07619375317350818,"score_gpt":0.3956607764570823,"score_spread":0.3194670232835741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096832485","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25467947,0.37894145,0.047171276,0.14761133,0.018229505,0.0196208,0.029195352,0.0012532441,0.103297554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3560208,0.41893807,0.105833426,0.03707738,0.00315674,0.030198948,0.024327913,0.00056073867,0.023886047],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9648381,0.011544499,0.010178166,0.0016085831,0.010963723,0.00086695404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7300052,0.13207407,0.019432524,0.0044524465,0.11100989,0.0030259152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08792744,0.00096323574,0.001096706,0.01751082,0.0023981929,0.0039720247,0.0023829206,0.0017887139,0.009080175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16295648,0.0011451882,0.002775131,0.011830735,0.0014402247,0.006553878,0.0043489076,0.0022916028,0.0032807898],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026250747,0.00085848273,0.08146702,0.020302203,0.0004050311,0.00050730194,0.014047154,0.00013789258,0.0019576156,0.0014730947,0.11516429,0.76341754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000230857,0.0015414329,0.47924027,0.1142383,0.0032763712,0.002334441,0.105323285,0.00054460124,0.0053609028,0.0024886613,0.28507277,0.00034805335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02621092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06564955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08792744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004194487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0155097265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4650103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096937300","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Discretion; Accreditation; Table (database); Table of contents","score_opus":0.1466311203043076,"score_gpt":0.40919324450535477,"score_spread":0.2625621242010472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096937300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000480877,0.0014186203,0.0015208975,0.0035402456,0.004560655,0.0005354838,0.016765108,0.0016136459,0.9695645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026885108,0.0017030643,0.0012609884,0.0019160818,0.0016517586,0.00025101306,0.014283068,0.0006075365,0.9756379],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991841,0.00009252316,0.000042464013,0.0001381779,0.00046510235,0.000077617515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674064,0.0004200514,0.00012723604,0.00025405904,0.0018537028,0.0006043326],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006855563,0.0006692092,0.00074092956,0.0025602523,0.0019612256,0.0050294064,0.001413451,0.0011994507,0.8308825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006241147,0.00032927384,0.00043303316,0.0023858696,0.0003529374,0.0024417532,0.0019271537,0.0015029731,0.7331816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008638242,0.00002373428,0.0001452504,0.00007629685,8.8113933e-7,0.000016550941,0.000026947298,0.000034538774,0.000084649015,0.0017095993,0.96254027,0.035332542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025643794,0.00000967138,0.0004397447,0.00008503963,0.0000011714034,0.000038341954,0.00004660743,0.000031130257,0.000051908635,0.00065163453,0.9986387,0.0000035151436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005348885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006980712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16911751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023424346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003307667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2412256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097088449","doi":"","title":"Counsel for the Attorney General of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03690351007707185,"score_gpt":0.3482987278908687,"score_spread":0.31139521781379687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097088449","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01728035,0.004598325,0.0008183064,0.6973123,0.009114027,0.00051835726,0.00093679863,0.00030127866,0.26912025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051238935,0.0021551342,0.0010499519,0.17772684,0.0008104989,0.00012486914,0.00023330431,0.0001078409,0.7665525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919125,0.0004935905,0.00029309982,0.00073191256,0.0031206906,0.0034480789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767305,0.0028153625,0.000546231,0.00039732349,0.012831466,0.0066791503],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035112584,0.0005849813,0.0010070264,0.0015674619,0.03128447,0.008037019,0.0029076347,0.020305956,0.064078756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025361437,0.0010779363,0.0007070046,0.0014047199,0.0029243869,0.0020196529,0.002637298,0.014525494,0.008301493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030037421,0.00004755655,0.004146414,0.00004731209,0.00001597911,0.00077206956,0.0009186246,0.00010886218,0.0002460778,0.012578618,0.9693196,0.011768838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045466182,0.000029247169,0.0074740984,0.00023709022,0.000046781035,0.00043073477,0.0041822046,0.00055406895,0.00031771263,0.002591415,0.9840225,0.000068583824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95090985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9831214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95090985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044133734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2516893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32021415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097196517","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Corporation; Table of contents; Voting; Table (database)","score_opus":0.055471642455260296,"score_gpt":0.3869331211830664,"score_spread":0.33146147872780607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097196517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044592214,0.00297728,0.0012798639,0.0062320735,0.021543726,0.00040510955,0.013550726,0.0013732768,0.952192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018285334,0.0026017576,0.0007123535,0.002245963,0.0061922935,0.00013663694,0.009456661,0.0005126671,0.9763132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990085,0.00010369315,0.00006708854,0.00017792612,0.0005564499,0.00008645366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951835,0.0005141939,0.00020626283,0.0003721398,0.002901938,0.0008219264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007613835,0.0007978608,0.0009153002,0.0040078275,0.0019012413,0.006277697,0.0013096692,0.0013775227,0.8013615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006307941,0.00036454227,0.00050239393,0.0034944706,0.00044588992,0.002865338,0.0018089388,0.001579694,0.7129134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007832783,0.000018699202,0.0001208156,0.00009002329,0.0000012802774,0.000015988036,0.000013912523,0.000025141177,0.00009013316,0.0012045833,0.9670414,0.031370196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023395985,0.000008018586,0.00034190473,0.00009737507,0.0000015450343,0.00003140014,0.000027181275,0.000024480265,0.000046204153,0.00042368373,0.9989926,0.000003281977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003432976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004255171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1986385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020714437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033694187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28333372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097236508","doi":"","title":"LEGAL AID IN","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Legal action; Government (linguistics); Per capita; Total revenue","score_opus":0.12761044944797922,"score_gpt":0.44923240139238413,"score_spread":0.3216219519444049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097236508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022410268,0.007047097,0.0005388815,0.013760141,0.0017096762,0.00019960395,0.00771765,0.00034652243,0.9462702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09979243,0.0070076785,0.0006859801,0.0038384718,0.0002816293,0.00009204204,0.008777919,0.000106662046,0.87941724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798125,0.00007822448,0.000057310324,0.00015295409,0.0009529265,0.00077733624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971726,0.00006940689,0.00010552589,0.00007012385,0.0014123382,0.0011699804],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007327959,0.00040978892,0.0003279621,0.0023010876,0.0066852793,0.004130838,0.0011394363,0.000753443,0.13988759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033479373,0.00019812072,0.0003191333,0.0031641573,0.0009089854,0.0010039863,0.0026280757,0.0014691029,0.022156406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058133086,0.00006353063,0.016298061,0.00022247933,0.000015887883,0.00044069457,0.0013556277,0.00018474393,0.0003172665,0.034953676,0.7625436,0.18354638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005829177,0.000012002882,0.013088429,0.00013737722,0.0000055854684,0.00012399867,0.0008007315,0.000048585116,0.000081788516,0.00041395336,0.9852765,0.0000052261175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7621361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8769833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8601124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022953512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06484615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47852945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097517645","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Corporation; Table of contents; Voting; Table (database)","score_opus":0.08389215324917623,"score_gpt":0.421101213522614,"score_spread":0.3372090602734378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097517645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004404803,0.0029539093,0.0012544288,0.006315179,0.021356313,0.0003976343,0.013446037,0.0013556613,0.9524804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017964047,0.0025657667,0.00069310784,0.0022472194,0.0061189136,0.00013338897,0.009297387,0.0005007964,0.97664696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990088,0.000103274746,0.0000668951,0.00017648833,0.00055842847,0.00008604735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99515593,0.0005161606,0.0002062528,0.00036881125,0.0029305373,0.000822258],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075884536,0.0007903429,0.0009109205,0.0040199114,0.0019089853,0.006293482,0.0012982894,0.001375219,0.8006684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006328784,0.00036449797,0.00049869105,0.0034907646,0.00044392055,0.002868713,0.0018081614,0.0015835537,0.711568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075437342,0.000018073539,0.00011852752,0.00008686707,0.0000012378757,0.00001558671,0.000013734919,0.000024433939,0.00008720889,0.0011889961,0.9679096,0.030528296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022880572,0.000007752536,0.00033648833,0.00009653418,0.0000015188145,0.000030510306,0.000027081027,0.000023977364,0.00004526762,0.00041801098,0.9990075,0.0000032314383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035113764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004371662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19933158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00209514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033775594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28432232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097588027","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Discretion; Accreditation; Table (database); Table of contents","score_opus":0.1466311203043076,"score_gpt":0.40919324450535477,"score_spread":0.2625621242010472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097588027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000480877,0.0014186203,0.0015208975,0.0035402456,0.004560655,0.0005354838,0.016765108,0.0016136459,0.9695645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026885108,0.0017030643,0.0012609884,0.0019160818,0.0016517586,0.00025101306,0.014283068,0.0006075365,0.9756379],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991841,0.00009252316,0.000042464013,0.0001381779,0.00046510235,0.000077617515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674064,0.0004200514,0.00012723604,0.00025405904,0.0018537028,0.0006043326],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006855563,0.0006692092,0.00074092956,0.0025602523,0.0019612256,0.0050294064,0.001413451,0.0011994507,0.8308825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006241147,0.00032927384,0.00043303316,0.0023858696,0.0003529374,0.0024417532,0.0019271537,0.0015029731,0.7331816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008638242,0.00002373428,0.0001452504,0.00007629685,8.8113933e-7,0.000016550941,0.000026947298,0.000034538774,0.000084649015,0.0017095993,0.96254027,0.035332542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025643794,0.00000967138,0.0004397447,0.00008503963,0.0000011714034,0.000038341954,0.00004660743,0.000031130257,0.000051908635,0.00065163453,0.9986387,0.0000035151436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005348885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006980712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16911751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023424346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003307667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2412256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097621786","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Discretion; Accreditation; Table (database); Table of contents","score_opus":0.1466311203043076,"score_gpt":0.40919324450535477,"score_spread":0.2625621242010472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097621786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000480877,0.0014186203,0.0015208975,0.0035402456,0.004560655,0.0005354838,0.016765108,0.0016136459,0.9695645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026885108,0.0017030643,0.0012609884,0.0019160818,0.0016517586,0.00025101306,0.014283068,0.0006075365,0.9756379],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991841,0.00009252316,0.000042464013,0.0001381779,0.00046510235,0.000077617515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674064,0.0004200514,0.00012723604,0.00025405904,0.0018537028,0.0006043326],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006855563,0.0006692092,0.00074092956,0.0025602523,0.0019612256,0.0050294064,0.001413451,0.0011994507,0.8308825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006241147,0.00032927384,0.00043303316,0.0023858696,0.0003529374,0.0024417532,0.0019271537,0.0015029731,0.7331816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008638242,0.00002373428,0.0001452504,0.00007629685,8.8113933e-7,0.000016550941,0.000026947298,0.000034538774,0.000084649015,0.0017095993,0.96254027,0.035332542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025643794,0.00000967138,0.0004397447,0.00008503963,0.0000011714034,0.000038341954,0.00004660743,0.000031130257,0.000051908635,0.00065163453,0.9986387,0.0000035151436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005348885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006980712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16911751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023424346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003307667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2412256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098000110","doi":"","title":"Kingdom, and Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Software; Minor (academic); Adobe; Computer software","score_opus":0.060723388692237916,"score_gpt":0.36664424104579013,"score_spread":0.3059208523535522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098000110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029268607,0.005811579,0.0014232872,0.012860284,0.0011568158,0.00024064285,0.024557542,0.00045792072,0.92422336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039024595,0.0016839434,0.00087161816,0.0014063033,0.000046816236,0.000054185897,0.0027695582,0.00015929584,0.9539836],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987674,0.00005921677,0.000044166525,0.00023496931,0.00048821073,0.0004061753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822277,0.00013221097,0.00016314887,0.00010881,0.00094226643,0.00043083113],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041134312,0.00050650194,0.00055821915,0.0011890602,0.008581626,0.0037298982,0.0009975729,0.0010970508,0.24716118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023651742,0.0003927894,0.00039801668,0.004182409,0.0015056438,0.0013918357,0.0018503335,0.0011492623,0.030939579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044879227,0.000047530153,0.027624018,0.0011063499,0.000089653615,0.0032307361,0.0076184063,0.00040449263,0.0024880248,0.082579136,0.7303965,0.14396638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019200252,0.000012878865,0.021352174,0.00014391102,0.000012980308,0.0002720774,0.0031124146,0.00006189683,0.00021707609,0.00092442555,0.9738512,0.000019873069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9061979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9854687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9061979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024930693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038749915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8268365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098136411","doi":"","title":"Compiled by","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Action (physics); Action research; Wish; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.029122383122795196,"score_gpt":0.4265818239567729,"score_spread":0.3974594408339777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098136411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074327725,0.001105146,0.00095852435,0.0048902067,0.0064529404,0.00021475865,0.009347683,0.0014071047,0.9748804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001931973,0.00067500817,0.00063444296,0.0008895016,0.00048727996,0.00007195171,0.004950898,0.0004290081,0.98993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989127,0.000113601476,0.00007905017,0.00021777759,0.0005444331,0.00013246521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787307,0.00017317533,0.000079039106,0.0003578953,0.0011254638,0.0003914035],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000963301,0.0007673388,0.0007095328,0.0030791438,0.0026320945,0.007586843,0.0013595251,0.0019765557,0.7974828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037095926,0.00038139478,0.0006235193,0.0029038563,0.00062211073,0.0032788913,0.0038280478,0.0018133577,0.6478183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028856808,0.00001838885,0.00024370015,0.0001366596,0.0000038999324,0.00005871326,0.00010845795,0.00004203769,0.00016187583,0.0068210885,0.92424446,0.06813181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027525705,0.0000037202587,0.00026042256,0.000044423898,0.0000011851026,0.000022010558,0.000052129933,0.000011257117,0.00003724496,0.00031233812,0.9992501,0.0000023594332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007381077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012046416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20251721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018674362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038085338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28886622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099198293","doi":"","title":"Knowledge Management 11-1 11Knowledge Management inthe Public Interest The continuing education imperative","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Public interest; Multidisciplinary approach; Variety (cybernetics); Legal profession; Economic Justice; Legal research; Continuing education","score_opus":0.13325812569397263,"score_gpt":0.4239653193035675,"score_spread":0.29070719360959485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099198293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006185089,0.010911538,0.005835214,0.34335804,0.0018840057,0.00016890968,0.0001722551,0.00015960827,0.6313254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29364255,0.021584455,0.016386602,0.06136431,0.0025112464,0.00023163023,0.00071088906,0.00014697765,0.60342133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98617095,0.0025401681,0.0003634501,0.0009202472,0.0071361167,0.0028689574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96181047,0.004693425,0.0015432179,0.001835142,0.016094264,0.014023589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012872027,0.00040607885,0.00051039556,0.0026596375,0.013711954,0.031183545,0.0025462795,0.006806571,0.02863765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016150804,0.00041035513,0.00042576564,0.0045119147,0.015410467,0.009839709,0.009248938,0.006818173,0.0054129474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001430472,0.00016734561,0.002465579,0.00025350804,0.00001117431,0.00023022613,0.004276345,0.00030483547,0.00028989444,0.41683087,0.37214616,0.20300967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005283215,0.00001556193,0.0035039147,0.000502431,0.0000044484377,0.00008605994,0.003026366,0.0002548751,0.00014216044,0.032198936,0.9602376,0.000022342876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5936254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7171422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5936254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06837123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23731895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8175356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099313140","doi":"","title":"Into the Boards ….……………………………………………………………….……………………………………….….44","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.07608999555435379,"score_gpt":0.39774842049649334,"score_spread":0.32165842494213953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099313140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022739148,0.0070994445,0.004915747,0.13225856,0.0031883582,0.00007738594,0.00018996398,0.00015285447,0.8293786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4106364,0.0044757556,0.0035116205,0.022371225,0.0012912407,0.00008907344,0.00013090488,0.0002468681,0.5572469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978479,0.00078566105,0.00007228829,0.00024174103,0.0006369544,0.00041532484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660563,0.00096845615,0.00026979603,0.00019180308,0.0012477455,0.0007166668],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031975978,0.0003759556,0.00022281348,0.0010823255,0.0074375896,0.011012812,0.00046225777,0.0028440685,0.039506037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008035168,0.00039176512,0.00032139884,0.0010728524,0.013765627,0.0075626043,0.0029600116,0.0052539846,0.006957988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057900143,0.00005554158,0.004969596,0.00011922594,0.000010758513,0.00016018884,0.035310443,0.0001468871,0.00055149343,0.64774513,0.22441168,0.086461134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023821336,0.000033063217,0.0056344005,0.0002610904,0.000013540588,0.00004532115,0.016882662,0.0001321907,0.00033687404,0.060807858,0.9158113,0.000017852453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07231399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13130084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.960494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007449962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01247544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14378613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099762024","doi":"","title":"Introducing `Coffee House&amp;apos;","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thursday; Jazz; White (mutation); Period (music); Ain't; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.1319573410570581,"score_gpt":0.4388735557706789,"score_spread":0.3069162147136208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099762024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036182352,0.00094274303,0.0021266306,0.01606649,0.018697208,0.00077702355,0.002851276,0.004990027,0.94993025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029738853,0.00017976658,0.0004637804,0.0010080361,0.0007182329,0.00004878276,0.00031371615,0.00028359305,0.9940103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932563,0.000054377477,0.000010210504,0.000118050986,0.00022273618,0.00026894108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975363,0.000056841196,0.00004637337,0.00008401194,0.00050312263,0.0017733332],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009791319,0.0012963131,0.00051070756,0.00067770947,0.005507665,0.0039647007,0.0016429541,0.0017635805,0.74368316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001432757,0.0006924642,0.0007164393,0.0004562609,0.001023334,0.0017726802,0.00375803,0.0025887375,0.42159265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024093422,0.000040431936,0.00017479135,0.000024987576,8.765823e-7,0.00008788064,0.00012085075,0.000013822605,0.00025534746,0.00047511928,0.9833423,0.015439503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005377312,0.000020883655,0.00082946033,0.000018791356,8.337711e-7,0.00002313105,0.0003111915,0.000016857446,0.00009206817,0.00009025504,0.9985857,0.0000054276493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04432437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2205037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74368316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035610893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003317371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36560482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100179836","doi":"","title":"An Explanatory Testlet Response Model.............................................................. 2","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Discretion; Accreditation; Public law; Consistency (knowledge bases); Common law","score_opus":0.050180616155381386,"score_gpt":0.40205362753764257,"score_spread":0.3518730113822612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100179836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5866602,0.00064159906,0.19915168,0.017999161,0.0021968598,0.012126684,0.07757128,0.0026434746,0.101009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8674737,0.0003695043,0.036618646,0.0010387305,0.00021192658,0.01296899,0.021074394,0.0002492587,0.05999483],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949647,0.0034863544,0.00021418332,0.00052229076,0.00046439574,0.0003480672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711822,0.020994604,0.0016139955,0.001294892,0.004355291,0.0005589353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008687177,0.0013926186,0.0009230535,0.0017676129,0.0010757928,0.0024650733,0.003119651,0.0028866383,0.108835965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04441692,0.000744804,0.0017145461,0.0020361121,0.00070104975,0.0021161302,0.0017937919,0.0028025336,0.020273123],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057367277,0.007372006,0.36936614,0.0021667369,0.0010383889,0.0013518963,0.009282858,0.053738367,0.0011719565,0.1509817,0.2213405,0.17645279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034129014,0.0033523554,0.1842181,0.0018415157,0.0015583303,0.0008537609,0.00930183,0.6054047,0.0015271185,0.08667789,0.10136079,0.0004906635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017007697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010093288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108835965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027922583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028806275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3640926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100256717","doi":"","title":"Administrations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Work (physics); Legislation; Public law; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.13039413851431167,"score_gpt":0.49819726126867114,"score_spread":0.36780312275435945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100256717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003011723,0.0009662799,0.0015729597,0.013306619,0.0036708405,0.000555542,0.0030745685,0.0018946159,0.97194684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00741223,0.00043358453,0.00056827854,0.0036963976,0.00050928886,0.00019217805,0.0012703848,0.00027826603,0.98563945],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899088,0.0017687154,0.00066002214,0.0011420639,0.004668596,0.0018517815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805006,0.0013863127,0.0007925344,0.0022571972,0.0106456075,0.0044177803],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064033964,0.0006506885,0.000673617,0.0033413155,0.0059085307,0.008833726,0.0014486146,0.0022723782,0.4637167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019167453,0.0006649135,0.00053273153,0.0032948768,0.0010587011,0.0031395347,0.0043998286,0.0032835961,0.36222148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039030554,0.000090485955,0.0010617933,0.0000552479,0.0000039154606,0.000057609966,0.00040776873,0.000030975276,0.00016938357,0.035636418,0.91529804,0.04714936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046818163,0.000009603203,0.0006145967,0.000019379291,0.000001290088,0.000018563178,0.00016193432,0.000018242385,0.000039207844,0.00056643336,0.9985424,0.0000036761037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0105147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012814077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5362833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005494447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017935216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76494306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100263608","doi":"","title":"� Developing an Assessment of First-Year Law Students’ Critical Case Reading and Reasoning Ability: Phase 2 Dorothy H.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Discretion; Common law; Accreditation; Reading (process); Public law","score_opus":0.11640078810724523,"score_gpt":0.5309148083977908,"score_spread":0.41451402029054557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100263608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97986436,0.00024049009,0.002924249,0.0008490161,0.00009276593,0.002275941,0.00043066664,0.00012129122,0.01320133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554058,0.00057660847,0.02168043,0.00044692523,0.000023447206,0.0038454006,0.001498717,0.00003840282,0.01648437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890304,0.0001986764,0.00014669262,0.0001334578,0.0005031719,0.00011492467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99475324,0.0011166352,0.0007821742,0.00023488713,0.0022424192,0.0008705677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043443083,0.0003561618,0.00041090083,0.0015950288,0.0010773692,0.0015647144,0.0009779782,0.0009187462,0.0031960872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010878213,0.00045158583,0.0005533873,0.00051186036,0.0005498006,0.0017334403,0.0014133616,0.0016767748,0.0011586777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004328203,0.0070842267,0.62900656,0.00025985952,0.000053609503,0.00045490655,0.014667535,0.0006378261,0.0079199225,0.0013712513,0.028372832,0.30973867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013855548,0.0021444745,0.9600975,0.00019206863,0.000044316846,0.0005690963,0.007878525,0.0021159118,0.0091097485,0.0012347184,0.016398244,0.00007680214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059514134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021891193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059514134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012194866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004680989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022975206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100391509","doi":"","title":"LSAC RESEARCH REPORT SERIES � Assessing the Impact of Topic Interest on Comprehension Processes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Comprehension; Process (computing); Work (physics); Subject (documents); Common law","score_opus":0.6038921834669119,"score_gpt":0.6007961538610703,"score_spread":0.0030960296058415437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100391509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8499668,0.0017072508,0.0048437864,0.0038301246,0.0010962633,0.008011608,0.022459654,0.0008053384,0.10727917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8308225,0.003079724,0.017049482,0.002102981,0.0011772435,0.018485766,0.03369667,0.0008838405,0.09270178],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874329,0.0044698515,0.0009662654,0.0008828048,0.0059090196,0.0003391443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.748483,0.14952137,0.017184146,0.014734402,0.06237004,0.0077070976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018208757,0.00067288906,0.00090568163,0.0038179746,0.0020767585,0.003039813,0.0017830475,0.0009306756,0.037121177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11298408,0.0008552806,0.0014116497,0.0033854803,0.0010162914,0.0043270746,0.0015996532,0.0028370398,0.009214257],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050604395,0.019224672,0.39233857,0.0030228,0.0009972086,0.0002914546,0.029761601,0.00077349256,0.004865329,0.004993586,0.16997014,0.36870077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005850867,0.003132114,0.9351573,0.00039834698,0.00060311815,0.00019404366,0.007010221,0.0010728876,0.0031500196,0.0015309585,0.047046248,0.00011963853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024972249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02862124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037121177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026227853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076732705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1241827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100711321","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Corporation; Table of contents; Voting; Table (database)","score_opus":0.055471642455260296,"score_gpt":0.3869331211830664,"score_spread":0.33146147872780607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100711321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044592214,0.00297728,0.0012798639,0.0062320735,0.021543726,0.00040510955,0.013550726,0.0013732768,0.952192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018285334,0.0026017576,0.0007123535,0.002245963,0.0061922935,0.00013663694,0.009456661,0.0005126671,0.9763132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990085,0.00010369315,0.00006708854,0.00017792612,0.0005564499,0.00008645366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951835,0.0005141939,0.00020626283,0.0003721398,0.002901938,0.0008219264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007613835,0.0007978608,0.0009153002,0.0040078275,0.0019012413,0.006277697,0.0013096692,0.0013775227,0.8013615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006307941,0.00036454227,0.00050239393,0.0034944706,0.00044588992,0.002865338,0.0018089388,0.001579694,0.7129134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007832783,0.000018699202,0.0001208156,0.00009002329,0.0000012802774,0.000015988036,0.000013912523,0.000025141177,0.00009013316,0.0012045833,0.9670414,0.031370196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023395985,0.000008018586,0.00034190473,0.00009737507,0.0000015450343,0.00003140014,0.000027181275,0.000024480265,0.000046204153,0.00042368373,0.9989926,0.000003281977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003432976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004255171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1986385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020714437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033694187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28333372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100787313","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Table (database); Voting; Table of contents; Basic law","score_opus":0.08389215324917623,"score_gpt":0.421101213522614,"score_spread":0.3372090602734378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100787313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052668696,0.0028773472,0.0006847878,0.003617489,0.0034443066,0.0004588983,0.0326518,0.0010419048,0.9546967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025580183,0.0030413559,0.0006993817,0.0014809413,0.0009779504,0.00014699288,0.018928595,0.00034905266,0.97181773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999271,0.000045627425,0.000030814666,0.00010427124,0.00044595488,0.00010228683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960163,0.00023264764,0.00010368235,0.00015665738,0.0027580692,0.00073259225],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051568577,0.0007531439,0.00094207993,0.004738404,0.0032347175,0.004765472,0.0015288106,0.0009831561,0.78278726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004193374,0.00031957266,0.0003632694,0.005728071,0.0004122399,0.0018836467,0.0016971923,0.0011537155,0.62370384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006559141,0.000015929847,0.0001748183,0.00009389046,8.312144e-7,0.000013150229,0.000030135297,0.000033090775,0.000059278747,0.00125534,0.9646627,0.033654332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018802058,0.0000052499404,0.00088239874,0.00010959815,0.0000012340149,0.000019966808,0.000066953275,0.000020257463,0.00003122153,0.0003423806,0.9985158,0.0000031487164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.086844064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13102941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21721274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055970754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096278405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30982757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100835900","doi":"","title":"AUTHOR’S TRANSLATION","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Translation (biology); Information system; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.1781616907116651,"score_gpt":0.47050242685404714,"score_spread":0.29234073614238204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100835900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042808303,0.00960829,0.004791025,0.09943056,0.2571071,0.0014037273,0.08835042,0.0015109808,0.5335171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06926352,0.018406019,0.008889597,0.019484252,0.015410456,0.00178091,0.04167873,0.0030972762,0.8219891],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958163,0.00052287616,0.0003440984,0.0004890548,0.0023290159,0.0004986879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963331,0.004011194,0.0005070745,0.001788553,0.029461045,0.00090117735],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026834258,0.0007321614,0.0010479954,0.003765607,0.004082525,0.004775034,0.0016939403,0.001313019,0.22309648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03588821,0.0003502417,0.00054565177,0.0040558344,0.0015549592,0.0018494433,0.0017943453,0.0037452301,0.08088997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022095892,0.000007435119,0.000097500386,0.00023778669,0.0000026049145,0.000069463495,0.0007767966,0.000041507432,0.00009725476,0.006730026,0.9805383,0.011379248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005301341,0.0000044088697,0.0007133561,0.00046028133,0.0000026826126,0.0000636682,0.0006659443,0.000032135635,0.00009610632,0.00074525556,0.9972,0.000010799873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28749168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26238406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7769035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0142669175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022209367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74633205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100927966","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Corporation; Table of contents; Voting; Table (database)","score_opus":0.1502876374256218,"score_gpt":0.3969323015744124,"score_spread":0.2466446641487906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100927966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044535298,0.0029673513,0.0012354039,0.0059807696,0.020563124,0.00039576623,0.012857401,0.0013567469,0.95419806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017263544,0.002529204,0.00066922547,0.002152012,0.0057969303,0.00012817413,0.008889105,0.0004863447,0.9776227],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905723,0.00009725653,0.00006426046,0.00016910625,0.0005294526,0.00008255929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954092,0.0004838622,0.00019981684,0.00035462237,0.0027587984,0.0007936808],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071943767,0.00080179627,0.0009035902,0.0040104017,0.0018714009,0.0061762896,0.0012698064,0.0013654622,0.79833454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005994193,0.00035991243,0.00049378007,0.0035004066,0.00042933633,0.0028113734,0.00178854,0.0015280684,0.7121098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000802404,0.000019211058,0.00012354806,0.000089094814,0.0000012942909,0.00001597187,0.000013636602,0.0000256413,0.00009340351,0.0011826892,0.9662339,0.032193553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023144848,0.000008017957,0.00034714662,0.00009532131,0.0000015527739,0.000030532723,0.000026337199,0.000024490086,0.00004559291,0.00041374523,0.9990018,0.0000032062728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003392096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041776053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20166546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019939344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032085353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2876513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7101048699","doi":"","title":"Development of Performance Standards in Civil Justice: A Discussion Paper","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Economic Justice; Incentive; Performance measurement; Scope (computer science); Plan (archaeology); Work (physics); Perspective (graphical); Dispute resolution","score_opus":0.02546515280779764,"score_gpt":0.37160211986162756,"score_spread":0.3461369670538299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7101048699","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00964346,0.04003577,0.07581492,0.61223173,0.005485937,0.0007119398,0.00023058163,0.00013674478,0.25570896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6601348,0.06461382,0.11668524,0.06458702,0.005696456,0.0015518065,0.0005871743,0.00039661772,0.08574717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94234043,0.034725185,0.002669946,0.0025818353,0.013308659,0.0043738633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9416797,0.03564894,0.0021404899,0.0022390306,0.016041616,0.0022502025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07378186,0.00094297976,0.0009210005,0.0054224464,0.010870699,0.020292182,0.004039702,0.012511844,0.0062043816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06286104,0.00064620643,0.00095206517,0.009765557,0.020227524,0.02257442,0.00825106,0.010162672,0.0008315468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005553514,0.00003378873,0.00021865206,0.00019392071,0.0000032355538,0.000052959644,0.0037028813,0.0005605693,0.00004226674,0.9614323,0.015609082,0.018144825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016295555,0.00006781836,0.0014098608,0.0027436288,0.000012310387,0.00008380609,0.021157514,0.0019947318,0.0005875487,0.34496388,0.62689745,0.00006512909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10633389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059490636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10633389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05171658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071430825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39020044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102522511","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0055","title":"Seventy-five years of legal education and scholarship at the ‘modern’ Faculty of Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal education; Legal profession; Legal research; Higher education; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.023926528288515745,"score_gpt":0.3374437462230814,"score_spread":0.3135172179345656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102522511","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014996242,0.33688837,0.0018886612,0.3919605,0.053952392,0.000056868605,0.00037044229,0.0001706779,0.19971582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24154489,0.23264538,0.0032663622,0.050565254,0.027698133,0.00011504219,0.00045615272,0.00032098603,0.4433877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392515,0.0011123313,0.00022801083,0.00032312007,0.0032765605,0.0011348333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908049,0.001459753,0.0005101036,0.00033908908,0.0023487946,0.0045373295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004741508,0.0004896258,0.00046067088,0.0024906383,0.0093535,0.009231124,0.0010817895,0.0035605493,0.017841442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085797245,0.00043572675,0.00031241143,0.003880093,0.016433233,0.0051395064,0.004641703,0.004715222,0.0031433217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018978357,0.000037196605,0.0010336803,0.0005261006,0.0000065991003,0.00019330565,0.04030898,0.00007929201,0.00032686803,0.2530875,0.62261844,0.0817631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013007278,0.0000064831606,0.0012824875,0.00029106997,0.0000011836306,0.000034136938,0.003386957,0.000008884489,0.000032444255,0.0018518032,0.9930956,0.000007715842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1688646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43004158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96007127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03992874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04445863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3357634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102692710","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0040","title":"Multidisciplinary Marty Friedland, miscarriages of justice, and the modern law school","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Multidisciplinary approach; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Social injustice; Focus (optics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.014064567837728262,"score_gpt":0.30338030359581064,"score_spread":0.2893157357580824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102692710","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030514397,0.14253417,0.003342334,0.6837144,0.0024078554,0.000013324364,0.00002344566,0.000033031753,0.13741717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83550465,0.06193355,0.0023570892,0.061090544,0.0051663797,0.00004684843,0.000018688854,0.00004698104,0.033835337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975055,0.0013220774,0.0000710424,0.00029377363,0.000480369,0.0003272341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460536,0.0032585922,0.0005892276,0.00021753467,0.00046578769,0.0008633755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039063073,0.00021773452,0.00039492015,0.0021390212,0.013631264,0.006778028,0.0008405741,0.0057658367,0.002725715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057255975,0.0003768595,0.000268013,0.0011721831,0.03952473,0.008131929,0.005310258,0.009475442,0.00028348254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008839949,0.00003539475,0.0008195422,0.00003654687,0.0000036539673,0.00008831157,0.012856834,0.00010580131,0.000035492063,0.94038314,0.033198386,0.012428046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010540779,0.000031590913,0.0025883878,0.000620964,0.000007786052,0.00029074936,0.011668576,0.0002579765,0.000121584526,0.5894806,0.39488572,0.00003552309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030773053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052990638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030773053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0149451215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010145053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108434916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102812399","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0051","title":"Professor Alan Mewett on morality and the criminal law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Morality; Public morality; Foundation (evidence); Public law; Criminal procedure; Focus (optics); Comparative law","score_opus":0.02755648655297038,"score_gpt":0.33728179897787536,"score_spread":0.309725312424905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102812399","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018191352,0.115782775,0.0016416516,0.77864176,0.0065630823,0.000024518109,0.00007629022,0.00003334246,0.09541742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14441164,0.179344,0.0048542344,0.2620482,0.00881268,0.00011417829,0.00010833404,0.00011805529,0.40018865],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716645,0.00081618235,0.000071715665,0.00033431273,0.0012000623,0.00041131483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603575,0.0016912841,0.00015871039,0.00009010041,0.001336824,0.000687294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024165406,0.00036757643,0.00038869554,0.0011976698,0.007985002,0.0050686,0.0010764602,0.004027548,0.0050850334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064127897,0.00032519578,0.0002601589,0.0011782516,0.013872563,0.004892154,0.0017964278,0.01092815,0.0015549072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011508815,0.000013248548,0.00031264324,0.00006074875,0.000004077403,0.00006727892,0.0033496716,0.00012631327,0.00006907753,0.31030893,0.6657265,0.019949991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039662837,0.000004445896,0.0004460421,0.00023023825,0.0000029817638,0.00007815583,0.00093680265,0.00009793378,0.00008065382,0.041402187,0.9566991,0.000017565108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38994458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5159533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38994458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022928448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023986766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77534974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103478134","doi":"","title":"3.3 Lloyd Gaines","year":2015,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Blue Tiger Commons (Lincoln University - Missouri)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Statute; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); State law","score_opus":0.09540813892857358,"score_gpt":0.328374988518429,"score_spread":0.23296684958985542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103478134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0115752155,0.001769847,0.0017112737,0.042305548,0.0016203119,0.00021965342,0.00018962234,0.0002646445,0.9403439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033223756,0.00039876375,0.0006205973,0.023965532,0.0001609709,0.00005932953,0.000049691094,0.00006681134,0.9414547],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929811,0.00052085076,0.00017129083,0.0009931774,0.0034715352,0.0018620586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784064,0.00025215876,0.00007195103,0.00018472184,0.0011306814,0.00051988923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032084498,0.0005054761,0.0004870872,0.0009807335,0.0129147265,0.0077359155,0.0018114374,0.007858599,0.05545736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006318968,0.0006094461,0.000917296,0.00054744404,0.0037285998,0.0023494565,0.004884124,0.007829753,0.014791556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006124731,0.00009242256,0.0028680903,0.00008923643,0.00001352254,0.0010138947,0.003935633,0.0001190235,0.001392898,0.44041643,0.5131049,0.036892638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006625094,0.000027662776,0.0012012225,0.00006246483,0.000005651335,0.00021891919,0.0009040447,0.00008559845,0.00039490362,0.0044237087,0.9926472,0.000022036984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28482246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4843032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28482246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010278731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022407249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56632924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106505471","doi":"10.1007/978-981-96-9748-9_7","title":"The Pedagogical Value of the Canadian National Negotiation Competition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Winnipeg; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick; University of Saskatchewan; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Nature versus nurture; Adversarial system; Competition (biology); Value (mathematics); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.10878554543939115,"score_gpt":0.4049599625734195,"score_spread":0.29617441713402837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106505471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002595516,0.0023181105,0.00090347975,0.016508922,0.00024923426,0.000011636216,0.00003760367,0.000019610936,0.97735596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3912949,0.0051908744,0.002986729,0.005423263,0.00026761644,0.00006140907,0.000073628216,0.00011879949,0.5945828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955426,0.0008734965,0.00004244776,0.00026458772,0.002093241,0.0011835863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733055,0.0009867862,0.00006284651,0.00014659723,0.00092822284,0.0005450502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034637807,0.00045871828,0.00039096468,0.0020364318,0.014055418,0.016583603,0.0018070121,0.0038862757,0.022407677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066738324,0.00039578436,0.00033632346,0.003091321,0.013466483,0.0046530096,0.0027029188,0.0052853934,0.0014695359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004191876,0.0000049931427,0.00009681958,0.000016171767,0.0000010855766,0.000034382218,0.001631124,0.0001817406,0.00003277259,0.95008624,0.03342747,0.014482925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006585525,0.0000066226908,0.001277925,0.00024266732,0.0000075753255,0.00008202423,0.0047983495,0.0009986337,0.0001676511,0.15603524,0.8363485,0.000028113665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9282239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97445583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11357119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11357119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.120319694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8240205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106552819","doi":"10.1007/978-981-96-9748-9_1","title":"Introduction: Transforming Legal Practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Legal profession; Legal practice; Economic Justice; Legal research; Legal realism; Practice of law; Dispute resolution; Empirical legal studies","score_opus":0.028863924610762745,"score_gpt":0.3678233956378466,"score_spread":0.33895947102708385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106552819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002257302,0.008795651,0.0016707398,0.007518509,0.0023574561,0.000042616055,0.0000752692,0.00006160712,0.9792524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035374772,0.0062940265,0.0010767287,0.0038509374,0.00079606863,0.00004025035,0.00009224897,0.00007291609,0.98423934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959403,0.00010021337,0.000012388544,0.000046009365,0.00020275808,0.00004454926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965656,0.00018072977,0.000011711662,0.00002847146,0.00008033621,0.00004224012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005781463,0.00052767276,0.00029220377,0.0013064774,0.0022355076,0.004492725,0.0007493854,0.0030984476,0.09296895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001122624,0.00024119946,0.00031889422,0.0013747908,0.002337857,0.0043523945,0.00195433,0.0038763096,0.029920667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036799079,0.000033505734,0.000030107936,0.00012762194,9.742263e-7,0.00004307822,0.0008294011,0.00016956184,0.00010928354,0.41530854,0.5097365,0.07360784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.5363885e-7,0.0000028119177,0.000038608032,0.00013684826,4.822144e-7,0.000030109944,0.0001359643,0.00003853608,0.000032542524,0.027560636,0.9720205,0.0000020568623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00481652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014805725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09296895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029321583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002458193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3110121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106582863","doi":"10.1007/978-981-96-9748-9_10","title":"Access to Justice and Dispute Resolution Skills","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Order (exchange); Procedural justice","score_opus":0.05683772467511326,"score_gpt":0.4248422213189658,"score_spread":0.36800449664385254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106582863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00088236073,0.0019078103,0.0008369713,0.0018195315,0.00011746629,0.00000784444,0.000017747396,0.0000094940815,0.9944008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036989808,0.0031559335,0.00088672596,0.0009142784,0.00019756364,0.000033732813,0.000046518,0.000029113997,0.95774645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994149,0.0001804388,0.00001307042,0.00006132964,0.00022747062,0.00010280691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931276,0.00043540084,0.000027802831,0.00004816661,0.000085664156,0.00009028364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068397966,0.000365578,0.0002824657,0.00086054386,0.0019062654,0.005487281,0.0007191124,0.0021748326,0.0821352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019807806,0.00018414592,0.00018530754,0.0010244489,0.003942692,0.0046673305,0.0023819518,0.002899844,0.009467344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037086356,0.000058140424,0.00008066581,0.0000370169,7.0831186e-7,0.000045391098,0.001721487,0.00011106325,0.00008698745,0.899146,0.04451991,0.054188978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029731357,0.0000108542745,0.0005487554,0.00021853019,0.0000013083187,0.00013771502,0.0016510366,0.00020613095,0.00014547436,0.2917526,0.7053189,0.0000057015513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056045884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018984796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0821352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025141358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025948267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2747696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111476603","doi":"","title":"School of Law named nation’s best value for fifth time in seven years","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Investment (military); Quarter (Canadian coin); Value (mathematics); Ranking (information retrieval); Legal education","score_opus":0.034019356938253975,"score_gpt":0.3467805358915319,"score_spread":0.31276117895327793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111476603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005623375,0.005490124,0.0018251325,0.1518989,0.04715348,0.00020832299,0.0019105683,0.0021011732,0.7837889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017474666,0.0010423604,0.0015496638,0.0183695,0.0010279712,0.00006171946,0.00066928787,0.00027268258,0.95953214],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978199,0.00022316375,0.000077750454,0.00028727134,0.0009631241,0.0006286982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631244,0.00013089285,0.00009501421,0.00025941982,0.0010627189,0.0021395108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017119616,0.00056762807,0.00050759205,0.0010151356,0.0056529567,0.006701692,0.00093230774,0.003924417,0.18462034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034130774,0.00042324638,0.0004693864,0.00052287406,0.0014119236,0.0024554948,0.0040341695,0.00566915,0.082790986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074483423,0.000035677414,0.00051227806,0.000020474321,0.000001995196,0.00006513431,0.000096804135,0.000012160703,0.00011506843,0.009723327,0.96703213,0.022377515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038307667,0.000016547265,0.0015519357,0.00009802036,0.0000016648337,0.000053378248,0.00020588719,0.00004183993,0.00013398,0.0009667987,0.9969158,0.00001029108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025803594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08477959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18462034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042275307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010620591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61761653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111573936","doi":"","title":"Curricular Choices: Misconceptions Regarding Law School Courses","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Legal education; Higher education; Competence (human resources)","score_opus":0.029314860765962996,"score_gpt":0.3524613979428314,"score_spread":0.32314653717686836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111573936","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30018145,0.016206183,0.008726561,0.5613589,0.002811075,0.000103007245,0.0004702334,0.00020205381,0.10994044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91929287,0.0055026296,0.0030832854,0.064818114,0.0006737633,0.00005673236,0.00014393005,0.00012864052,0.0062999753],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96070313,0.012268562,0.0018468677,0.0034747268,0.018240254,0.003466507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92454576,0.045627736,0.0051033064,0.002631103,0.01638361,0.0057085822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048083685,0.00049610005,0.00048049484,0.0046492787,0.021680927,0.011848346,0.005171689,0.0047915317,0.0022231298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078040965,0.00077140424,0.00054580416,0.00571737,0.035239212,0.0061593754,0.0050887642,0.009192,0.00039344034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021214219,0.00017431146,0.040995184,0.00061797746,0.00007894078,0.00064648304,0.3577586,0.0008989063,0.0009624851,0.3032354,0.10718434,0.18723524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103007085,0.00015834998,0.06585777,0.003716042,0.00013369792,0.00047822774,0.28890923,0.0016572123,0.0024970677,0.06788112,0.5681236,0.0004847982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7442299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77302456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7442299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06592748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03998497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5145527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113706274","doi":"","title":"100% of first-gen college graduates receive aid","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal education; Higher education; Value (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Class (philosophy)","score_opus":0.037292281919520706,"score_gpt":0.33383710934975047,"score_spread":0.29654482743022975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113706274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46842378,0.010577823,0.00080730685,0.045401424,0.0056261527,0.00061762915,0.05034853,0.0016562752,0.4165412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5805756,0.009113027,0.00093690975,0.026750607,0.0013642889,0.00040635408,0.025156524,0.00032263072,0.35537407],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985738,0.000101379395,0.000045140085,0.00016079891,0.00056850765,0.0005504094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978623,0.00010300356,0.0003045286,0.00012327157,0.00042112626,0.0011857847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000600008,0.00030846742,0.00028025478,0.0010407958,0.0014438027,0.0015878894,0.00064312754,0.00095546566,0.088840246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034932818,0.0002986521,0.00035192238,0.0015607956,0.0004995686,0.00092190166,0.0023379582,0.0012746237,0.035581622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056675763,0.000187273,0.13322392,0.00016454946,0.000016548653,0.00029635758,0.00056721235,0.00003891685,0.00074272766,0.0012893287,0.707222,0.15619451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060113758,0.00010997144,0.40284488,0.00037415558,0.000017796761,0.00095774967,0.0033787363,0.0001416735,0.00040048102,0.0005343929,0.59115005,0.000029906008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0198464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040438175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088840246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059627026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028396456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2972002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114832071","doi":"","title":"Don’t Just Change the Rules, Change the Game: The Rules Overhaul and Ontario’s Legal Ecosystem","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Ecosystem; Legislation; Liability; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.07878989805586858,"score_gpt":0.32839659768175067,"score_spread":0.24960669962588208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114832071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34232038,0.0016053505,0.0013195948,0.2666634,0.00037715072,0.00008916801,0.0004556044,0.000050642073,0.3871187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90971684,0.0005381983,0.00055811706,0.009786874,0.000042795295,0.00003253826,0.00005927051,0.00005436385,0.079211004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942059,0.00079795485,0.00012698052,0.00045363087,0.0015562972,0.0028593405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99008805,0.0020217323,0.0006481279,0.00052084005,0.002567206,0.0041540773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004084173,0.00017829426,0.0003247902,0.0009308126,0.038572196,0.013523267,0.0016106954,0.0056207743,0.012553488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010636562,0.00048527212,0.0004005284,0.0015003448,0.020736437,0.0051895655,0.0056453017,0.005772721,0.00064548524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014761771,0.00010754072,0.045326937,0.000114693416,0.000055569697,0.0012261595,0.1087735,0.00090092135,0.0006530776,0.67991215,0.12864809,0.034133665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008458473,0.00005902494,0.07463901,0.0003201507,0.000069737005,0.00027355226,0.12395393,0.00130349,0.00054555136,0.094424255,0.7041164,0.0002102584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98891544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8802626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11973742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20861956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8687598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114893992","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5824082","title":"From Data to Understanding: Access to Knowledge as&amp;nbsp;a Requirement&amp;nbsp;for Access to Justice in New Brunswick","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.4368885060801102,"score_gpt":0.5427931261012434,"score_spread":0.10590462002113321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114893992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046011377,0.0047123265,0.028003227,0.333818,0.00046039335,0.00026925746,0.0033735756,0.00030783896,0.583044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8406031,0.0057570925,0.026416512,0.015982872,0.00018476033,0.00035431838,0.0020664579,0.00043276785,0.10820202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98439294,0.00713171,0.0014871743,0.0014430444,0.0033112392,0.0022339055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9205589,0.05090328,0.0024937405,0.012987843,0.009754649,0.0033016643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026865406,0.0003782838,0.00083364535,0.0035303596,0.007811098,0.023527708,0.0029202949,0.006242037,0.039570164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08837095,0.0009977387,0.0006286719,0.0072726347,0.0193768,0.038510457,0.015543173,0.0076574488,0.0039285086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007246494,0.00005930791,0.0045854915,0.0002693953,0.000013946426,0.00054488034,0.030172229,0.000411121,0.00065760186,0.78860295,0.058451507,0.11615908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004913074,0.000020084472,0.0053024376,0.0010954032,0.000029720004,0.00030229668,0.036748625,0.0011089774,0.002559884,0.5138704,0.4388088,0.000104202685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6245059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6490746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37549412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031973686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09512355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75541097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115379435","doi":"","title":"Comparative Family Law by FL-EUR:First Results and Working Methods on Vulnerable Adults","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"VU Research Portal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.2716903778007749,"score_gpt":0.5378039896915112,"score_spread":0.26611361189073635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115379435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.557183,0.026578493,0.03058505,0.0043151663,0.00053206633,0.005223478,0.004632293,0.00016601698,0.37078437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8367818,0.020254098,0.050542466,0.0018950179,0.00023974573,0.017312236,0.003616228,0.00032150222,0.06903696],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98002887,0.016899796,0.00046062758,0.00078127807,0.0009002993,0.00092911435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979294,0.016355759,0.00066966703,0.0013988747,0.001755454,0.00052629074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025006576,0.0010420955,0.0013707334,0.008912749,0.007664446,0.0043862895,0.0022154145,0.0019536847,0.026325563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023357365,0.00053642667,0.0008039162,0.01551143,0.0040640305,0.008119077,0.010663064,0.0017102209,0.0024331978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032767866,0.0012750014,0.014646447,0.0014951866,0.0000452305,0.0006363115,0.6267214,0.0002909677,0.0005917527,0.09441314,0.013407587,0.24614927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091796275,0.00066033215,0.040191703,0.0033358105,0.00009586483,0.00049902656,0.7675443,0.00039723876,0.0010383421,0.019509027,0.16657099,0.0000656111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011980583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017517854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026325563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007580971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044678473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.132249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117124360","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70035","title":"New footprints on an old trail","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Field (mathematics); Family law; Publishing; Mental health; Learning disability","score_opus":0.08069392064567658,"score_gpt":0.44890399487255994,"score_spread":0.36821007422688334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117124360","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013655127,0.0607365,0.0031701408,0.7670872,0.09328997,0.000042843087,0.000340177,0.0003683075,0.07359935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07676719,0.097626865,0.011813619,0.44883046,0.14770222,0.00029803906,0.00077537034,0.002195117,0.21399112],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697109,0.01033241,0.0017541928,0.0036252553,0.012167469,0.0024098298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87732375,0.04678006,0.004244821,0.01996604,0.034233727,0.017451659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037343875,0.00088914717,0.0017596988,0.0066975513,0.013073665,0.032249015,0.0030452206,0.00916562,0.05681956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10832157,0.0009121121,0.001202753,0.0044653453,0.022468677,0.039150085,0.01109646,0.017820574,0.01757079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051391064,0.000048862305,0.0003784516,0.00034018524,0.00002651573,0.00022893627,0.002258054,0.00006326907,0.00016456607,0.14115624,0.7840538,0.07122973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045575084,0.000010437833,0.00014637932,0.00038138905,0.0000036275655,0.00009063165,0.0013697695,0.000024260497,0.000032402797,0.023306437,0.97461504,0.000015126566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005853811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120618045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05681956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068653254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019685807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19749564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119515939","doi":"10.1093/jpo/joaf013","title":"Deference to authority: how seniority influences how attorneys view professional obligations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Professions and Organization","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Seniority; Deference; Professional conduct; Professional responsibility; Legal ethics; Transactional leadership; Legal profession; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.0348290785316277,"score_gpt":0.3972478834253698,"score_spread":0.3624188048937421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119515939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99512535,0.00005154091,0.00015436954,0.00028237636,0.0000044201447,0.00000475973,0.000005513396,0.0000023758296,0.004369255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995316,0.000021403619,0.00004370058,0.000052623203,0.0000021451465,0.0000014067759,0.0000060151683,0.0000016972127,0.00033943984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654883,0.0015129376,0.00014121327,0.00034972274,0.0008290403,0.0006181533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978312,0.007801389,0.0058610695,0.000888491,0.0027838894,0.004353102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004658801,0.00012748524,0.00022591444,0.000990927,0.0027055112,0.0062254206,0.00067332655,0.00094046205,0.0045141964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03151767,0.00019846405,0.00016563082,0.000512224,0.0036738615,0.0019162968,0.0017416435,0.0010865409,0.0003190834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031200374,0.00039531308,0.71088475,0.000047377212,0.0000695228,0.00060179917,0.26002908,0.00035677344,0.00252701,0.004405085,0.0011029802,0.01926835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026088423,0.000165486,0.7271979,0.000105475294,0.000041205843,0.00022011616,0.25951943,0.0011320278,0.00037864048,0.0049096947,0.006249652,0.00005424315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088283785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11288569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088283785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031157103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002898171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17553979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126283232","doi":"","title":"Osborough and Legal Education and Scholarship for Irish University Law Schools: Marking the Dawn of a New Era","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Scholarship; Legal education; Legal research; Legal profession; Higher education","score_opus":0.10430094028553875,"score_gpt":0.4021104475168937,"score_spread":0.2978095072313549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126283232","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13631645,0.016400103,0.0005491256,0.5212318,0.0025947765,0.00008559998,0.00040986785,0.00014779197,0.3222645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7116149,0.006162907,0.0013276336,0.03900061,0.0004944869,0.00006596309,0.00019213691,0.00016681527,0.24097468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814618,0.0029699637,0.00047784953,0.0008637192,0.0039077993,0.010318868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753583,0.0028244357,0.0011962738,0.00071636244,0.006525242,0.013379315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01015289,0.00031262654,0.000616294,0.0029063923,0.033554524,0.026238253,0.0026444646,0.006455554,0.019530617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020875925,0.0006231762,0.00044470327,0.005499066,0.021274272,0.007153815,0.013396441,0.009001553,0.0013980776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092287446,0.0001472154,0.0156428,0.00027099712,0.000014033069,0.00044577508,0.068252616,0.0002116317,0.0002734851,0.42924783,0.3796157,0.105785675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001783837,0.000051194937,0.022742074,0.00045446088,0.000012563269,0.00009839515,0.13824743,0.00016413705,0.00035010325,0.008441431,0.82931983,0.000100613695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.915797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97006994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.915797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16111845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28286022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9729837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128200143","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v14i1.171","title":"Comparing the Reports of the Ontario Law Reform Commission and the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law reform; Advisory committee; Reform Act; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.10397769389845003,"score_gpt":0.3675786213985325,"score_spread":0.26360092750008246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128200143","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066080816,0.024896998,0.0016322607,0.4392138,0.0123800505,0.0019192274,0.029592052,0.00037373847,0.42391098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46133083,0.023884838,0.003966575,0.1367092,0.0064370674,0.0015628848,0.019787367,0.0005136379,0.34580758],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8730003,0.007747656,0.0052827494,0.0032633147,0.10078907,0.009916801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5579679,0.0803125,0.0195433,0.0068603144,0.32319143,0.012124564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05872387,0.0006602744,0.0010797576,0.020471852,0.008788441,0.013137664,0.0039536078,0.0067984425,0.010726492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21058398,0.0012382341,0.001239907,0.020437745,0.0039890427,0.0025116976,0.0028106796,0.0049653915,0.0012698077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014613553,0.000042620635,0.017327502,0.0010208503,0.00015176386,0.000116918454,0.0039966395,0.00022676282,0.0002872034,0.019772645,0.93777096,0.01914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008779265,0.00004710082,0.13613193,0.0010013884,0.00035112875,0.00004031518,0.0048283753,0.00032477986,0.00082642335,0.0011650637,0.85506445,0.00013121111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9653468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14048369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14048369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31546068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99691707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132928919","doi":"","title":"The Bounds of Legality for Family Lawyers: Is the Law Enough?","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Positivism; Principle of legality; Family law; Context (archaeology); Legal positivism; Discretion; Judgement; Legal ethics","score_opus":0.09179031210820125,"score_gpt":0.47712671582119226,"score_spread":0.385336403712991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132928919","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08595421,0.017984709,0.012359272,0.7261018,0.00081670086,0.000034506953,0.000028966324,0.000039157097,0.15668073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96831435,0.0056259483,0.0022904743,0.017838951,0.0003816387,0.000051666328,0.000014582804,0.000025196177,0.00545719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893339,0.0070577473,0.00025707876,0.00075421215,0.0014149114,0.0011821521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974536,0.01844389,0.0021381348,0.0012173876,0.0014851219,0.0021793353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012793848,0.00019345133,0.0005102533,0.0010705456,0.011251784,0.013654511,0.0012625458,0.0072397757,0.006035092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044540986,0.00037596977,0.00032696495,0.0009441157,0.05000022,0.021481618,0.0062634586,0.009798781,0.0007674412],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008042197,0.000041608433,0.0010052585,0.00004510337,0.0000026476685,0.0001545783,0.024929,0.00008857422,0.000057226058,0.94965315,0.00558129,0.018433565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002063499,0.00003056138,0.0016006469,0.000869425,0.0000087655735,0.00023767372,0.03489911,0.00041041282,0.00019983448,0.85412145,0.10757622,0.00002529125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01675833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013122933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01675833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013427933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018848555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09742695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132937678","doi":"","title":"Legal scholarship: an analysis of law professors&apos; research activities in Ontario&apos;s English-speaking common law schools","year":2002,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Legal research; Higher education; Empirical legal studies; Government (linguistics); Politics; Position (finance); Legal education","score_opus":0.26714671422285746,"score_gpt":0.5470561434967584,"score_spread":0.2799094292739009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132937678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933002,0.00064908445,0.000069395974,0.0011825324,0.000008429444,0.000054792912,0.00028830155,0.0000053564663,0.004441929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942047,0.0009913391,0.00015658,0.00017426348,0.000017096114,0.000042749194,0.00019559216,0.00000676624,0.0042109657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99187547,0.0014225828,0.000452579,0.0006523182,0.0031885759,0.0024083902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97419286,0.0049771345,0.006316291,0.0004666353,0.006367391,0.007679636],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004421929,0.00014820657,0.0005527841,0.008153984,0.0071364883,0.004971391,0.0013964389,0.000681639,0.0028987732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014588424,0.0003731494,0.00026257106,0.016607134,0.003728961,0.0014709396,0.0039971215,0.0006717748,0.00029477017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007300035,0.000099979305,0.5539082,0.00022018419,0.000020770503,0.00062549877,0.40515265,0.00006681477,0.000939892,0.002491597,0.002282743,0.03411858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003259321,0.000038411607,0.77908874,0.0000595947,0.000008867698,0.00006923168,0.20821567,0.00007460799,0.00009510962,0.00006203656,0.012272199,0.000012295189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84149665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95376194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99557805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044068944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081414424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3197441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132940483","doi":"","title":"Roles and the Filtering of Reasons","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Scope (computer science); Filter (signal processing); Moral disengagement; Moral character; Normative ethics; Moral rights; Moral authority","score_opus":0.03387853908674058,"score_gpt":0.44451519299633874,"score_spread":0.41063665390959814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132940483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026103223,0.0026291527,0.1754522,0.047321152,0.0006332425,0.00010116869,0.000083512554,0.00017892565,0.7474975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9215655,0.0010880628,0.02556796,0.00494429,0.00041990302,0.0001921108,0.000081279315,0.00017176566,0.045969184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98678046,0.007970124,0.00044250666,0.0015054016,0.001987119,0.0013143463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858446,0.008663832,0.0010867092,0.0020356453,0.0015842692,0.00078488747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012157754,0.0007705384,0.00054453005,0.0026398383,0.0064088264,0.011109046,0.0016626931,0.0046929615,0.010237213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01697606,0.00046975614,0.0011795437,0.0012704234,0.06514805,0.018998066,0.005478316,0.0056910315,0.0019293176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003685514,0.0000024827802,0.00006283813,0.000007274048,7.0394424e-7,0.000011670081,0.001896904,0.000050361243,0.00002149888,0.9955641,0.000620762,0.0017578389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109832345,0.0000094135785,0.00016082067,0.00006193907,0.0000035162525,0.000051559855,0.0013834347,0.0004629977,0.0001488513,0.9476837,0.05001242,0.000010492936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005320572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035269042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012157754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070893234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078056124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06429714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132965282","doi":"","title":"Lessons from Bear-Walker (Mukwo-bimossae) and Water Lilies on Decolonization and Indigenization of Canadian Legal Education: An Analysis of the University of Ottawa’s Certificate in Indigenous Law","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenization; Indigenous; Decolonization; Colonialism; Traditional knowledge; Indigenous rights; Legal education; Certificate; Legal history","score_opus":0.03773667902174665,"score_gpt":0.35897071301911104,"score_spread":0.3212340339973644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132965282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7280083,0.0049997084,0.0015795897,0.070628226,0.0002450065,0.00015192886,0.0001873157,0.000040811312,0.19415909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611151,0.0024287147,0.00080542074,0.0030413847,0.000023578821,0.000035832032,0.00004739839,0.00003973805,0.032462806],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977203,0.00046284296,0.000038592116,0.00018962094,0.0005253198,0.0010633273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976993,0.00092824467,0.00013580463,0.00006336852,0.0005183763,0.0006549048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020864992,0.00035555978,0.00035436812,0.0019845143,0.03368084,0.0073408037,0.0015034791,0.0019228964,0.0046260366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00402244,0.00026212633,0.00026868,0.0030063933,0.027089227,0.003935566,0.004053081,0.0040623867,0.0002441797],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012552323,0.000026193144,0.003529774,0.000063366286,0.000003220873,0.0005878792,0.8797036,0.000094432864,0.00031682808,0.089037456,0.01028303,0.016341664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024264789,0.000014254096,0.0116395755,0.00019125537,0.0000066243088,0.00010861275,0.8358773,0.000084802785,0.00025759698,0.0042090393,0.14757796,0.00003055959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9710715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.898588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.101412006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09908748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7357991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132979630","doi":"","title":"Towards a More Responsive Legal Ethics","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Information ethics; Harm; Applied ethics; Meta-ethics; Legal profession; Legal research; Ethics of technology","score_opus":0.10157637268423882,"score_gpt":0.5316061451314007,"score_spread":0.4300297724471619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132979630","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02673219,0.002019329,0.0990105,0.62307,0.0013344067,0.00037580152,0.000025051795,0.00032378014,0.24710895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7206318,0.002887687,0.09888456,0.11981041,0.0015884293,0.0014111254,0.000091555106,0.00044049713,0.05425406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8983792,0.082926385,0.0014428506,0.004780168,0.009145826,0.0033254756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93374634,0.039684422,0.0040750317,0.005895784,0.0072292,0.009369244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.078863464,0.0008713316,0.0010693341,0.0032802348,0.012603545,0.021663932,0.003459328,0.015593957,0.00853716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05085329,0.00089775753,0.0012407694,0.0014863252,0.06404865,0.028655443,0.028153915,0.0318759,0.0033668398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005713082,0.00018191955,0.00040018925,0.000114907685,0.00000806504,0.0001213483,0.04083618,0.00039231303,0.0003882681,0.93818307,0.0061489907,0.0132190045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028263084,0.000060324488,0.00041440115,0.00044131454,0.0000069202706,0.0001099373,0.027780049,0.0009369017,0.00048570003,0.79606473,0.17364135,0.000030077234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018568168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001677903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078863464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012112151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030209765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41707486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133014402","doi":"","title":"Justice for All: Ontario&apos;s Civil Access to Justice System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Legal profession; Civil law (Civil law); Legal action; Civil procedure; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.24800723953165102,"score_gpt":0.5329575458339828,"score_spread":0.28495030630233176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133014402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.177903,0.002865536,0.0014705393,0.15046853,0.00037032305,0.0003252379,0.001805958,0.00012278791,0.664668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76304734,0.0021868218,0.0017868194,0.010842052,0.00012842396,0.00012077011,0.0005370812,0.000050956965,0.22129966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662626,0.00022362858,0.000073462485,0.00017914188,0.001268932,0.0016285641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929376,0.00066246255,0.00038222273,0.00029669006,0.002437716,0.0032833659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015513846,0.00016510133,0.00023108062,0.00083663105,0.015698114,0.004460439,0.0010544409,0.0020318474,0.015316764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053516207,0.00026690427,0.00032438143,0.0016819703,0.0047382084,0.0020024127,0.0030445508,0.0017169366,0.0007340868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010182295,0.00011707372,0.053912945,0.00054991344,0.000035374494,0.0016943356,0.03850334,0.00086958084,0.0015064487,0.54464185,0.24582203,0.11224527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032645465,0.000036958376,0.0979745,0.00021659338,0.000025208737,0.00020000806,0.014030262,0.00064728485,0.0002914071,0.012672541,0.873819,0.00005354227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11865505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11865505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26570886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86090666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133041788","doi":"","title":"THIS TEACHER&apos;S EXPERIENCE WITH RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AND RESTORATIVE PRACTICE : a narrative","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Narrative; Work (physics); Economic Justice","score_opus":0.06961409668821011,"score_gpt":0.5044956552061468,"score_spread":0.4348815585179367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133041788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5799327,0.004098892,0.005704099,0.080985144,0.0020161336,0.00023734312,0.00022586162,0.00013986755,0.32666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8895517,0.0016601483,0.0011745614,0.0033049383,0.00014123968,0.00014342394,0.00005397976,0.0001890872,0.103780955],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994816,0.0032942204,0.000090288886,0.0003771163,0.0006580234,0.000764384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951546,0.0025934246,0.00036541995,0.00021709301,0.0004126473,0.0012568408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038224186,0.0004436511,0.0008275415,0.0011189934,0.025609858,0.009565853,0.0014884342,0.0036512793,0.007765502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0092044985,0.00056306104,0.0003803627,0.0011172306,0.018858641,0.0069066966,0.008439495,0.0108285565,0.0011204835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016780277,0.000044622207,0.00047154992,0.00005093402,0.0000013790942,0.0008094183,0.9708965,0.00002270482,0.00017131251,0.01881369,0.0052227243,0.0034783746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000480621,0.000019861563,0.00061834085,0.000107789296,0.0000019761114,0.00048654992,0.87535375,0.000035959605,0.00013819094,0.0011901595,0.12203277,0.000009791577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02526226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06967249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025609858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008644525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072148615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06272066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133119035","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.18820719","title":"Access Denied: Barriers to Legal Redress in Urban Slums of Senegal 2005","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Focus group; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Slum; Quarter (Canadian coin); Local government; Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.07672735785617908,"score_gpt":0.45401004803093314,"score_spread":0.3772826901747541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133119035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967259,0.00020645607,0.0000356842,0.00095523143,0.000007570763,0.000018226887,0.000047520185,0.0000023963096,0.0020008911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987036,0.00026696478,0.000064595006,0.00015579493,0.0000030612766,0.000020668851,0.000025317871,0.0000014691205,0.0007585059],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991309,0.0003106967,0.000047577094,0.00004294086,0.00007905447,0.00038885046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980038,0.00061873766,0.0007297237,0.000059200906,0.00018223654,0.0004062799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011068897,0.000284317,0.00021095123,0.00096657063,0.00407158,0.0015948336,0.00078140403,0.00044564938,0.008487575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004762047,0.0002882924,0.00014592754,0.0012261611,0.0023637984,0.0014417595,0.003482744,0.0007594863,0.0003035282],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020212421,0.0002558785,0.64351296,0.00071968813,0.00006944231,0.006953145,0.2547751,0.00025952977,0.002181128,0.007142132,0.0056788917,0.078250036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015228277,0.0001695633,0.4665892,0.000492515,0.000042632782,0.0015180305,0.5142874,0.00025493675,0.0005240725,0.0008704983,0.015203807,0.000032053158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0990248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25827798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0990248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002826833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042675333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19689685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133153297","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.18820718","title":"Access Denied: Barriers to Legal Redress in Urban Slums of Senegal 2005","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Focus group; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Slum; Quarter (Canadian coin); Local government; Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.0523195478751605,"score_gpt":0.35459589738185915,"score_spread":0.3022763495066986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133153297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968534,0.00022866993,0.00003475759,0.0008443712,0.000007752649,0.000018896999,0.000057257676,0.0000024711558,0.0019524142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871564,0.0002713475,0.000059091682,0.00013845073,0.0000030942049,0.0000213307,0.000031104344,0.0000015876526,0.00075827446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990771,0.00031873953,0.000048487876,0.000047065405,0.00008320544,0.00042540088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998168,0.0005440109,0.0006777308,0.000057069756,0.0001745139,0.00037852823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001030952,0.000310838,0.00021912677,0.0010162517,0.0037757093,0.0015434882,0.00081116107,0.00045810867,0.0085683465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004616458,0.00029502687,0.00014705436,0.0012875041,0.002284937,0.0013860473,0.003540873,0.00069741573,0.0003377245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022063266,0.00026829235,0.6775965,0.00072022015,0.0000726819,0.006454045,0.22475962,0.00025337923,0.0021502315,0.006100741,0.0055877264,0.07581588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015820026,0.00016481309,0.51158786,0.00048309777,0.000044026146,0.0014873167,0.46941215,0.00026481145,0.0005321439,0.000804639,0.015169164,0.000034191075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10325554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25190157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10325554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028072216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004027561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20530903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135160335","doi":"","title":"Doing Feminist Legal Work. Best Practice Guide 6","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Irish Research Council; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Best practice; Conversation; Value (mathematics); Power (physics); Conversation analysis; Legal practice","score_opus":0.03924397688400463,"score_gpt":0.40694989639701956,"score_spread":0.3677059195130149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135160335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022456483,0.012000086,0.07097276,0.086725235,0.0040159584,0.0049606687,0.008616277,0.0109234415,0.7995398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0085123675,0.016586507,0.21976559,0.027743049,0.00070321973,0.007955759,0.0054492764,0.0023538887,0.7109302],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965971,0.0012790916,0.00025758657,0.00015710131,0.0014385877,0.00027055613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907199,0.0049993997,0.00037528086,0.00051213644,0.0021140224,0.0012790927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004713367,0.000844997,0.0007035496,0.0031475588,0.002032621,0.0033823734,0.0027214796,0.0046424647,0.1655043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011865654,0.0013089416,0.0006878652,0.0021978992,0.0016929068,0.0034740518,0.0034665815,0.005057423,0.09633264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016365573,0.00020021589,0.00013340586,0.00049074466,0.0000015885756,0.0002977826,0.0017256527,0.00021614603,0.00021743633,0.0056343623,0.75726366,0.23380259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011752812,0.000020346737,0.00027698,0.00058292266,8.2837727e-7,0.00038546792,0.00066360587,0.00006448425,0.00006908874,0.003919366,0.9939942,0.000011063679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007851456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02883387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1655043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019537236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008983739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55366707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135338846","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice in Rural Communities: Global Perspectives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ANU Open Research (Australian National University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Rural area; Social justice; Diversity (politics); Rural management","score_opus":0.4726175598594464,"score_gpt":0.5646288043336498,"score_spread":0.09201124447420339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135338846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09042133,0.07847057,0.0009454626,0.09171425,0.0015542093,0.00003855271,0.00011570937,0.000054853946,0.736685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.748685,0.09039586,0.00076207356,0.015208024,0.0010327955,0.00012367859,0.00011025555,0.000106925116,0.14357534],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987771,0.0006842523,0.000019519188,0.00006841612,0.00015536882,0.00029538645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993524,0.00032093597,0.000054381737,0.000023468074,0.000063860956,0.00018506752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011770575,0.00043567127,0.00052645925,0.0013162725,0.010318526,0.008798146,0.0007170803,0.0027663736,0.011913894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011628207,0.00022788094,0.0002216684,0.0034924706,0.009586897,0.006584109,0.0075431704,0.003431575,0.00065236934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002271312,0.000067875495,0.001271253,0.00078443415,0.0000104491755,0.0015921457,0.47678658,0.00025589234,0.00062603323,0.4207155,0.0574773,0.040389773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003754448,0.000041539744,0.0016522347,0.0006514249,0.000005024524,0.0007040057,0.30268878,0.000056309287,0.000057132896,0.026155382,0.66797304,0.000011393739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0104390355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026661186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011913894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035765108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029340882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039855957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139171276","doi":"","title":"Navigating the Gendered Landscape: The Impact of Institutional Participation and Professional Culture in Shaping Inequality","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Earnings; Workforce; Agency (philosophy); Inequality; Perception; Equity (law); Job security; Valuation (finance); Masculinity; Wage","score_opus":0.07466627033786667,"score_gpt":0.4398883844645561,"score_spread":0.3652221141266894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139171276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91219616,0.0033651043,0.0023068194,0.012637809,0.00011707345,0.000016750426,0.00006702995,0.000011089509,0.06928213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998044,0.00044141753,0.00017966346,0.00035250248,0.000023793044,0.000006854919,0.000008411455,0.00000768255,0.0009355822],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676883,0.0019932732,0.0000496282,0.00024300248,0.00035723377,0.0005880663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701786,0.0017111966,0.00037212027,0.0001450403,0.00024235582,0.00051143905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003611297,0.000175383,0.00025247855,0.0010013416,0.004549583,0.0059955963,0.0007005555,0.0006800794,0.0052599064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051583312,0.00015299152,0.00020507259,0.00091255555,0.012096288,0.0039043338,0.005898141,0.0013244231,0.00025077543],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021613078,0.00022336282,0.19233409,0.00024481624,0.0000862399,0.0008769385,0.39958647,0.0005951166,0.001670143,0.2655572,0.0042726225,0.13433698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028484821,0.00024269939,0.25678116,0.0011998009,0.000066366774,0.00045965423,0.5180593,0.00097081147,0.0012541392,0.13011503,0.09073844,0.00008406557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008834394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012355456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008834394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023391207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023698672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01909858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139179727","doi":"","title":"Law & Entrepreneurship in Global Clinical Education","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social entrepreneurship; Mindset; Entrepreneurship; Legal education; Civil society; Globalization; Liability; Legal profession; Commercial law","score_opus":0.053555213159279455,"score_gpt":0.4100427381064112,"score_spread":0.3564875249471317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139179727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062998556,0.030963521,0.0026586037,0.41541559,0.0020026688,0.00011554836,0.000047577007,0.00013906592,0.48565894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8470996,0.0235129,0.003145379,0.069430806,0.0013092691,0.00011145622,0.000066143715,0.000084929394,0.05523952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963748,0.0018256193,0.000095461946,0.00028800275,0.0004017987,0.0010142048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99108446,0.0025653248,0.0005322037,0.00031128843,0.00045146438,0.0050553177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005898935,0.00026372366,0.00025727734,0.0014936492,0.005243157,0.01292947,0.00064474595,0.003955648,0.014990121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065072593,0.0002333558,0.0002297725,0.0018798789,0.019063406,0.007496192,0.013225442,0.0063455747,0.0010660534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018706123,0.00022792767,0.008888672,0.00032798055,0.000009081146,0.0009324332,0.036054954,0.00042446388,0.00020713506,0.68309295,0.07631717,0.19349849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023803943,0.00010075289,0.012284684,0.0017156501,0.000006084938,0.00081421627,0.050731763,0.00034840574,0.0001783861,0.20358476,0.73018193,0.000029547118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035625226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008104862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014990121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006931955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020728711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050295115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139432441","doi":"","title":"Carey Forward","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Care Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Bar (unit)","score_opus":0.15144683214637333,"score_gpt":0.3902096404696988,"score_spread":0.23876280832332547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139432441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076093455,0.0035053245,0.0006438004,0.09889463,0.032615904,0.000072505565,0.0012372402,0.00075571495,0.86151385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013903349,0.000512612,0.000077427605,0.009132437,0.00052311626,0.000013598657,0.00017629996,0.00007679964,0.98809737],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989881,0.000076684,0.000022110135,0.00017614033,0.00043732938,0.00029959247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986827,0.00009872338,0.00003951469,0.00008719698,0.00048619634,0.0006056316],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000976454,0.0006529727,0.00034212545,0.0007925882,0.0052639847,0.005423948,0.0008239987,0.0037721074,0.47767803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005025845,0.00039643532,0.0004136271,0.0004459943,0.00092719146,0.0026553595,0.0031403673,0.006117888,0.23032561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095085725,0.0000062570043,0.000060928003,0.0000078520325,6.074316e-7,0.000028592434,0.00005483257,0.0000042263387,0.000035811885,0.0050313165,0.9838148,0.010945122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001874515,0.000003125218,0.00013830273,0.00002019453,3.469396e-7,0.000009917772,0.0000745541,0.0000037159914,0.000021725424,0.0002661191,0.9994584,0.0000016548879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024198016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09505219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52232194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027772645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004699331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74502885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139685271","doi":"","title":"In Brief","year":2002,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); The arts; Legal education; Class (philosophy); Supreme court; Service (business)","score_opus":0.09007811307973447,"score_gpt":0.39547490952512704,"score_spread":0.3053967964453926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139685271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002658818,0.0023182856,0.00083802664,0.013339469,0.03944963,0.00042542635,0.0045101414,0.0015452127,0.93730795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000930583,0.0010742842,0.00023842094,0.0039111436,0.0039864397,0.00009322685,0.0012874443,0.00023170053,0.98824686],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885523,0.00010529145,0.00008722094,0.00021416107,0.00059893704,0.00013909263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962025,0.00032726701,0.00013966455,0.00032078227,0.0019830687,0.0010266423],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008097339,0.0009211184,0.00080067234,0.0014359683,0.0021114121,0.0059653083,0.0015570697,0.003249049,0.86864436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055930987,0.0004640916,0.00054357795,0.0011853313,0.00038217494,0.0039007396,0.0025695758,0.0022833105,0.8150443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008665878,0.000014959365,0.000049073966,0.000056087374,7.637643e-7,0.000021216416,0.0000104744695,0.0000071818813,0.000059162954,0.0007202641,0.9667087,0.0323434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032189557,0.000007793175,0.00010519113,0.000034417884,8.399462e-7,0.000030183468,0.00002169831,0.000005890311,0.00002574979,0.00024628628,0.99951696,0.0000017663588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017619813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004029562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13135564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013773523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036230814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139714201","doi":"","title":"Thinking About Clinical Legal Education:Philosophical and Theoretical Perspectives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Explore Bristol Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Legal practice; Legal education; Clinical Practice; Feature (linguistics); Philosophical methodology","score_opus":0.27335998919225385,"score_gpt":0.5644053134584671,"score_spread":0.29104532426621327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139714201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057351077,0.03686981,0.013804508,0.21324456,0.0033247462,0.00006748067,0.000041689415,0.00006864723,0.7268435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48358223,0.10167688,0.04273725,0.08316514,0.006898064,0.00089609955,0.00020291105,0.0001965428,0.28064492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964102,0.0025004065,0.000061946615,0.00014183494,0.0006929793,0.00019259461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950222,0.0040159533,0.00015461814,0.00008445899,0.0003255254,0.00039731438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050289244,0.0007133982,0.00039061948,0.0024103285,0.0057182023,0.011061942,0.0016221884,0.0039139367,0.0052502374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042193206,0.00029758314,0.00037107946,0.0022634012,0.04241324,0.008482696,0.0034918897,0.009548318,0.0013312858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026015446,0.000020192769,0.000051008126,0.000084896594,0.0000010420086,0.0000886705,0.011226397,0.00014985875,0.000041909992,0.96424586,0.016314564,0.0077729844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010082477,0.000019970352,0.00017436026,0.0006704405,0.0000021788112,0.00030013736,0.025111532,0.0005822605,0.00007036218,0.67016095,0.30288312,0.000014556922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004592708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054695574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011061942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008162767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008133979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05922532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7159746040","doi":"","title":"Young Lawyers’ Career Prospects:Views on Canadian Energy Law Practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Explore Bristol Research","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Energy (signal processing); Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.48882655956371424,"score_gpt":0.5421581399441019,"score_spread":0.053331580380387655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7159746040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2504495,0.006914132,0.00023150828,0.48940322,0.00085112447,0.00006384378,0.0007738798,0.000031350457,0.25128138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88495874,0.0052557196,0.00020293273,0.028092977,0.00016762952,0.00003634707,0.00022684534,0.000038293736,0.081020504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896533,0.0010510451,0.00015812258,0.0003146833,0.0033168232,0.0055061327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9487506,0.011154343,0.0022548493,0.00033166047,0.012496914,0.02501172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007963053,0.00021380497,0.00032673124,0.0032199488,0.036647953,0.013402626,0.0025863994,0.0065745474,0.034726985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031231161,0.00036497627,0.0005221362,0.006513535,0.008143009,0.003384769,0.0048602787,0.007106643,0.0010122302],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017104164,0.00018446962,0.0700781,0.00036699412,0.00003717054,0.0012076454,0.21725138,0.00032174896,0.0005060912,0.24364176,0.37867326,0.087560296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026946414,0.000035135097,0.100607395,0.0008851603,0.000025354257,0.00017175367,0.35212892,0.00017112028,0.00018746754,0.005269355,0.5403676,0.00012376734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99467456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12153218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12153218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25407088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8817818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161978005","doi":"10.82308/5497","title":"Teaching and learning in Canadian legal education: an empirical exploration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socratic method; Teaching method; Empirical research; Legal education; Legal research; Focus (optics); Order (exchange); Socratic questioning","score_opus":0.07896984684809902,"score_gpt":0.4476956829819199,"score_spread":0.36872583613382093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161978005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760261,0.0007929297,0.0002775636,0.0024090388,0.00003055986,0.00022305944,0.00040116502,0.00001941947,0.019820146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938127,0.0009962945,0.00049801875,0.00033787606,0.00000938397,0.000070777365,0.0001935947,0.000012326599,0.0040690564],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885776,0.0017489872,0.00031498555,0.00066484424,0.005777226,0.0029163563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977581,0.007089908,0.002238214,0.00039517353,0.008261163,0.0044344873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064649964,0.00048494848,0.00078121794,0.0060344976,0.027405431,0.006726203,0.0030400092,0.0013488843,0.005099697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02584816,0.0006193276,0.00043623373,0.013841717,0.0074584186,0.0023574773,0.00460966,0.002623292,0.0002661932],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014473009,0.0007712169,0.19000903,0.0005938887,0.000031728407,0.000820922,0.687976,0.00042042648,0.00050327124,0.01416146,0.0074099298,0.097157426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024388062,0.00009965976,0.26938668,0.00044950788,0.00003156953,0.00016585922,0.68729806,0.00096458464,0.00036313286,0.00061694626,0.04052265,0.000076985605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99374074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8130414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18695861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23921789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9430128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162074602","doi":"10.82308/19841","title":"The cost of family law legal services in Canada: a historical and critical analysis of lawyers' business decisions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Practice of law; Legal profession; Scholarship; Legal ethics; Legal advice; Legal opinion; Legal service; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.051981890827558164,"score_gpt":0.40217592833840576,"score_spread":0.3501940375108476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162074602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5938687,0.029148705,0.0010546126,0.10074854,0.00033112743,0.00014505108,0.0012337633,0.00005801923,0.27341157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683099,0.012669183,0.00042271186,0.0025762424,0.00007220463,0.000024532392,0.00016604298,0.00003257275,0.015726598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950734,0.00041678356,0.00008198342,0.00027086944,0.002299542,0.0018574846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98659897,0.0034424337,0.0011419223,0.00017883389,0.0063654184,0.0022725437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002473062,0.00026722715,0.0003360589,0.007529525,0.030341871,0.011203236,0.0025764205,0.0024840035,0.004363399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015487601,0.00042825335,0.00025482196,0.013215067,0.010753008,0.0032197805,0.001983034,0.0039604376,0.00021439431],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011729179,0.0001643494,0.06882638,0.0003300934,0.000035715184,0.0021878018,0.2920743,0.0017020297,0.000416374,0.43009728,0.08299998,0.12104847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013244749,0.000040102546,0.19145721,0.001063793,0.0000492559,0.00043367044,0.27471593,0.0024283722,0.00048187305,0.0102244755,0.51892406,0.00016806307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99857414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38624492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.38624492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3035829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7118689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7163100280","doi":"","title":"Legal education and teacher training: the role of teaching and learning centers","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Repositorio Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (Universidad de Buenos Aires)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socratic method; Process (computing); Promotion (chess); Face (sociological concept); Legal education; Legal research; Teaching and learning center","score_opus":0.013671733601620153,"score_gpt":0.28344437683170404,"score_spread":0.2697726432300839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7163100280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32775375,0.011519338,0.017039642,0.0778681,0.0010753388,0.0005579725,0.00042786504,0.0011362943,0.56262165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90408295,0.0021122328,0.0069777276,0.0022577457,0.00019026363,0.00014556265,0.00013103017,0.00014203294,0.08396043],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952733,0.002213724,0.00008512795,0.00047093112,0.00048220952,0.0014748352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842978,0.0021613636,0.00075183844,0.00045399275,0.0014425796,0.010892549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041743494,0.00025661077,0.00028251257,0.0011696423,0.0067841527,0.010856762,0.0019979768,0.002493897,0.03388858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058069075,0.0002765083,0.00014834924,0.001186402,0.0044791303,0.0030068075,0.0048247096,0.0018660263,0.0027741666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002914003,0.0012694906,0.035634723,0.0005064423,0.000031534353,0.00062158995,0.022403087,0.0009988989,0.0016271087,0.15296057,0.08203838,0.7016168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001639113,0.0005056232,0.0708892,0.0010229442,0.00004503685,0.0007890601,0.040700372,0.002776231,0.0022795878,0.023470521,0.8572674,0.000090190566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040416893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06326577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040416893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011019935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032370906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11336857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164939817","doi":"10.1080/17153379.2011.12559148","title":"Legal Education in Asia: Globalization, Change and Contexts. Routledge Law in Asia, 7.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Legal profession; Legal history; Higher education; Legal realism","score_opus":0.05101347274689451,"score_gpt":0.33257308010628567,"score_spread":0.2815596073593912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164939817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03776492,0.19336818,0.0023011893,0.30533966,0.001232926,0.000031806103,0.00032499203,0.00021279397,0.4594236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5827594,0.18477967,0.0031757401,0.01725378,0.0014016721,0.00010294197,0.00031862562,0.000097838245,0.21011029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941814,0.0002271217,0.00004872446,0.0000463431,0.0001360234,0.00012360328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973743,0.0011639748,0.0003408491,0.00013920733,0.00044046895,0.0005411885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017832884,0.00024485672,0.00019726514,0.0010902045,0.0026208723,0.006015083,0.0005157239,0.002588441,0.015247648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038054811,0.00022013318,0.00013587766,0.0032038384,0.005558329,0.008780685,0.0023278964,0.0028567757,0.0015206308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025627302,0.00013735109,0.0057093534,0.0008617282,0.0000065338304,0.0012154628,0.0425721,0.00034362965,0.0005107353,0.36591005,0.28182298,0.30088443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012122351,0.000042516156,0.018363409,0.0017413987,0.000014426985,0.00053915463,0.045492433,0.00031322896,0.0006130349,0.06624487,0.86660546,0.000017979448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03162342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08287494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03162342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036069173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015263815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06287873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165203122","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0005","title":"Is law an intellectual practice?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.029475989745648953,"score_gpt":0.3601314257086606,"score_spread":0.3306554359630116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165203122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018967267,0.009504798,0.000640683,0.68577045,0.0021260104,0.000017194969,0.00010082286,0.0000590817,0.28281367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8485431,0.012005994,0.0009745526,0.031364482,0.0018134449,0.000037020774,0.00009319154,0.00007435449,0.10509377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930264,0.0026908536,0.00024458754,0.0005975128,0.0019669842,0.001473702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969236,0.011551786,0.0024340749,0.002039737,0.0047321483,0.010006242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008884299,0.000292342,0.00051984296,0.0015815874,0.0126699405,0.024825612,0.0013068321,0.007134732,0.022851447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027589414,0.00034483313,0.0002555348,0.0028532166,0.06579949,0.0101889325,0.0048624747,0.0067395386,0.0019985219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016199298,0.000037289225,0.0016107109,0.0001264804,0.00000687703,0.00018628083,0.030420594,0.000072839895,0.00008195781,0.83848137,0.105461225,0.023498205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029238578,0.000030526146,0.0077218525,0.0006819887,0.000021340256,0.0001744804,0.08979539,0.00021706051,0.00019844438,0.19916947,0.7019231,0.000037162557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4067783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6190966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4067783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047202572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0856797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8088212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W74597807","doi":"","title":"Dispelling Stereotypes of Lawyers in Today's World","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.06180371161904504,"score_gpt":0.35239541141702035,"score_spread":0.29059169979797533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W74597807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9279787,0.0005264543,0.0016396361,0.013200044,0.00036797678,0.0000638047,0.000083998326,0.000027352962,0.056112066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98826665,0.00037698768,0.00064577244,0.004878767,0.00012820942,0.000068972055,0.000056590205,0.00004899286,0.005529142],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867148,0.008552608,0.00031233983,0.0008756496,0.0024312877,0.0011133777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969971,0.01733309,0.0050390842,0.0021369744,0.0032884884,0.0022312393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015221708,0.00044183087,0.00047201503,0.0027858538,0.013315785,0.009699193,0.0015257653,0.0026762725,0.0068642464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03234622,0.0006793031,0.00038024233,0.0013552422,0.016376205,0.010451376,0.009342654,0.0078553315,0.00092949433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030769723,0.00006443958,0.006603992,0.000032237724,0.0000047537674,0.0002483127,0.97776115,0.000010091423,0.00044608416,0.006141809,0.0030394227,0.005616887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010559503,0.000030409497,0.0052537895,0.00011105271,0.0000055536516,0.00013094832,0.9688843,0.00007806384,0.00025176254,0.0023212794,0.022906322,0.000016042737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02205019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046745617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02205019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064614047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033110804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08050108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W768228461","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1031","title":"Taking the Stand: Access to Justice for Witnesses with Mental Disabilities in Sexual Assault Cases","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Psychology; Cross-examination; Credibility; Adversarial system; Witness; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Adjudication; Law; Social psychology; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.17586761981313812,"score_gpt":0.46419973751623367,"score_spread":0.2883321177030955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W768228461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4216123,0.005569577,0.007303121,0.25379297,0.0028427714,0.00040621328,0.00016919857,0.00011316754,0.30819073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628704,0.0014690385,0.0017383004,0.020486997,0.0006729509,0.00014973363,0.000051410407,0.000029105582,0.012531976],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98958814,0.0043720026,0.00069338066,0.00065576535,0.001425218,0.0032654784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780025,0.013776006,0.0021232492,0.0010309877,0.0015680176,0.0034992977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0108815115,0.00036783933,0.00045346332,0.0017229699,0.017152375,0.01181909,0.0026188714,0.010975866,0.013513753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060715366,0.0005523099,0.0006231017,0.0009200594,0.007867776,0.012321358,0.021711862,0.007860298,0.00094508496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002947976,0.00048570565,0.043748356,0.0005885719,0.00008826722,0.045437526,0.3677,0.0004056563,0.002967607,0.31236553,0.06581711,0.16010086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010527555,0.00050392677,0.021716531,0.0032338658,0.0001533779,0.011254769,0.5621512,0.0009205351,0.0021026155,0.13242291,0.26522663,0.00020836966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012459266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040266108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017152375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031609926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011790403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05754763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W782106486","doi":"","title":"Quebec's Bill 1: A Case Study in Anti-Corruption Legislation and the Barriers to Evidence-Based Law-Making","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science; Language change; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09216367684182367,"score_gpt":0.38724132922455684,"score_spread":0.2950776523827332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W782106486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57259345,0.005918211,0.0029753966,0.20760952,0.0005211168,0.00073578034,0.0005977244,0.000085930864,0.20896292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9131527,0.0025368044,0.0027014164,0.027009103,0.00007816248,0.00020459508,0.0001213134,0.000038024424,0.05415788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936615,0.0025522911,0.00013799542,0.0003341345,0.0014168393,0.0018971486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985414,0.008143104,0.000660205,0.00042206122,0.0026684848,0.002692135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071718106,0.00046353272,0.00046742227,0.0012843205,0.03519078,0.0062882365,0.0029136604,0.010989917,0.0044376943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012488394,0.00046958218,0.0005546916,0.0032197055,0.00707863,0.0016226255,0.0027504445,0.0073033688,0.0002782293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024089598,0.0012264324,0.06312789,0.0010000413,0.00016200004,0.1221723,0.15244791,0.0053388923,0.003546714,0.32744724,0.24035643,0.082933314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016719905,0.00037066897,0.10235745,0.0016393377,0.00013886651,0.011259242,0.24135762,0.005834785,0.0014387043,0.012076957,0.62305593,0.00030325336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96553904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08373944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08373944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08748772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.607575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W792452101","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2343107","title":"A Context of Justice: Ontario's Justices of the Peace From the Mewett Report to the Present","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Political science; Law; Public administration; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.027303329724707736,"score_gpt":0.3396250838070234,"score_spread":0.31232175408231566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W792452101","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14969146,0.008009825,0.00038798124,0.5692059,0.0029783875,0.00008044699,0.0007330054,0.00003157014,0.26888144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75104827,0.0037963137,0.00030580652,0.054691005,0.00054066745,0.000055337903,0.00014888462,0.000069065456,0.18934466],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994097,0.0005820291,0.00010150115,0.0002913888,0.001396057,0.0035318993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940654,0.00093989953,0.00034297912,0.00016738774,0.0015735229,0.0029108692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030208044,0.00026454614,0.00038737842,0.0008743427,0.050187558,0.011019545,0.0017049132,0.0072554685,0.010233445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009027998,0.00043670912,0.00042649682,0.0018901493,0.013525289,0.003571286,0.00594103,0.011749223,0.00040600065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012131145,0.000059923997,0.017226208,0.0002000353,0.000048673053,0.0029720718,0.21470657,0.0003503795,0.0004989424,0.28183988,0.45793456,0.024041409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001632568,0.000016137648,0.030734224,0.00026955426,0.000027711021,0.00017572948,0.18138549,0.000085571046,0.00017634795,0.008594096,0.7784367,0.00008195125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99856997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14642541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14642541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2429614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9900255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80060253","doi":"","title":"Black Bay Street Lawyers and Other Oxymora","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bay; Law; Political science; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.029001481220952096,"score_gpt":0.3516721106032808,"score_spread":0.3226706293823287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80060253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17873695,0.010931957,0.0010558434,0.38385248,0.005493681,0.0000991596,0.0001423626,0.00012873106,0.41955882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30176964,0.0034247255,0.00053505495,0.05140144,0.0003713382,0.000049254846,0.000036981055,0.0000817966,0.6423297],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973654,0.0007019694,0.00002889027,0.00019836867,0.0005989378,0.0011063273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611354,0.00050636695,0.00034020338,0.00010076342,0.0005954027,0.002343737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017062317,0.00027714332,0.00027915023,0.00093400234,0.029297378,0.006753681,0.000667756,0.0031849276,0.043912947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055823284,0.00037419493,0.00013551225,0.0009525569,0.008095334,0.0036002917,0.00516154,0.0046707033,0.0037839278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051356314,0.0001116257,0.0056990436,0.00007131451,0.000010498095,0.001409109,0.2762442,0.00004085067,0.00095483026,0.108869776,0.55920243,0.047335017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054066154,0.000021676637,0.0026520214,0.00012561273,0.000003464751,0.00023832744,0.1128671,0.000037110516,0.00015199547,0.0029862926,0.8808947,0.000016233023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16918924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45374525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16918924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008871112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01023033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3364089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W816251261","doi":"","title":"Legal Education at St. John's: A Modern Approach","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"St. John's law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04647324269966916,"score_gpt":0.3728569035166119,"score_spread":0.3263836608169427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W816251261","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075758537,0.16391473,0.0040607415,0.64422286,0.0038828766,0.000048844657,0.000061509694,0.000039838553,0.17619275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5041191,0.18736315,0.008020387,0.1870184,0.015645845,0.00019509233,0.0000710574,0.000067466935,0.09749944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923044,0.0029732825,0.0002803075,0.0007852173,0.00284931,0.0008074539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820343,0.012569935,0.0009102535,0.00069970096,0.002559623,0.0012263071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008922884,0.0003584696,0.0005174522,0.0048958436,0.0051446655,0.0105269505,0.0011977991,0.011279557,0.0071801576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020560997,0.00047892777,0.00036417827,0.0027610022,0.018513646,0.0065404708,0.0028494948,0.009691259,0.0005324422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009609616,0.00003845804,0.00036431558,0.00038707512,0.000011916871,0.00011957187,0.0011083075,0.00029126837,0.00014894022,0.8954061,0.050717525,0.05139689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021213038,0.000058450543,0.0035859877,0.0021328502,0.000026768981,0.00020277203,0.0009957709,0.0005149781,0.00033853741,0.34499958,0.6470862,0.00003684813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049450733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11825448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049450733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022272132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04564465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16159636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W825474895","doi":"","title":"Taking a Dip in the Supreme Court Clerk Pool: Gender-Based Discrepancies in Clerk Selection","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Selection (genetic algorithm); Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09085787691393424,"score_gpt":0.39003363429190696,"score_spread":0.29917575737797275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W825474895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9427729,0.004898916,0.00072009984,0.01950653,0.00013781736,0.000027478723,0.00027349926,0.000007535039,0.031655174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698013,0.0005556589,0.00008539967,0.0012044272,0.00003181857,0.0000070063893,0.000035696467,0.000006317792,0.0010934094],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426925,0.0020406456,0.00022416245,0.00078872684,0.0013271613,0.0013501428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98996115,0.004956912,0.0017285441,0.00035591418,0.0013177028,0.0016797403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009040484,0.00009237434,0.00034438484,0.001966829,0.004322939,0.0024633643,0.0010380315,0.00081450323,0.0049791834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02217172,0.00014708059,0.00021932136,0.002400365,0.0044234907,0.0019785007,0.002188215,0.0011288911,0.00029467663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002939843,0.00010336701,0.5988619,0.00026059503,0.00014857677,0.0013075885,0.15547343,0.00030870966,0.0013230783,0.11869485,0.023925455,0.099298544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024605275,0.000058986723,0.83753943,0.0003552344,0.000045868423,0.00029645895,0.12541059,0.00029229146,0.00046485986,0.007855106,0.027619854,0.000036771635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15839301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4489042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15839301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073041846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006311412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31494212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W83908100","doi":"","title":"McGill's Integrated Civil and Common Law Program.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal education; Political science; Higher education; Civil law (Civil law); Civil rights; Common law; Sociology; Commercial law","score_opus":0.05009939989880461,"score_gpt":0.320135969415673,"score_spread":0.2700365695168684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W83908100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006977772,0.002365098,0.00066595286,0.021296011,0.0009033128,0.0002603103,0.0046350025,0.0007651847,0.96213126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017072279,0.00033726715,0.0003376509,0.0019587348,0.00006603427,0.00004329518,0.0005052438,0.000067224326,0.9796123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918276,0.00008138603,0.0000116161655,0.00009170457,0.00032937745,0.00030305935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757344,0.00020601612,0.00007398404,0.00011479194,0.0003838518,0.0016479538],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063266157,0.00044830854,0.0002533278,0.0008712358,0.0026011928,0.0018272889,0.0010727594,0.0015630509,0.44152078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027357643,0.00031714575,0.00018471094,0.0007224697,0.00075658894,0.0011575221,0.002358966,0.0012828998,0.064854674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036040878,0.000049856888,0.0005809003,0.000030356348,0.0000013549806,0.00006624906,0.00010632901,0.000032254742,0.00020354641,0.004693922,0.9166223,0.077576995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023904267,0.000032015916,0.007842416,0.000042217067,0.0000031235834,0.00006112493,0.00019082343,0.000090270994,0.00021773213,0.000761015,0.9907252,0.000010162404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25891513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6457505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44152078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048517464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012074529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79660285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W857062757","doi":"10.29173/alr1282","title":"Civil Justice Reform and Mandatory Civil Mediation in Saskatchewan: Lessons from a Maturing Program","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Adversarial system; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Referral; Civil procedure; Flexibility (engineering); Restorative justice; Conciliation; Party-directed mediation; Public relations; Alternative dispute resolution; Psychology; Public administration; Management","score_opus":0.03526037886867344,"score_gpt":0.3862143226411867,"score_spread":0.35095394377251327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W857062757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9444641,0.0008995827,0.001006738,0.020046042,0.00012419432,0.00054541795,0.000108898676,0.00006655065,0.032738518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807422,0.00097160426,0.0026644133,0.0034024604,0.00002539729,0.0003024865,0.00014693645,0.000021410906,0.011723112],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950735,0.0024008795,0.00010013524,0.00025980044,0.0005443867,0.0016213204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889999,0.0039268397,0.0005085922,0.0006685649,0.0015726478,0.0043234336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004176419,0.0003130629,0.0002847258,0.00096253946,0.0087914085,0.004274775,0.0037035032,0.0019857613,0.0060526635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008293277,0.00042719385,0.00034836787,0.0017362424,0.004182492,0.0022317285,0.006086914,0.0033618787,0.0003652533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010942047,0.00894359,0.15175237,0.00090120896,0.0002801542,0.011918222,0.094994076,0.009144686,0.012632454,0.08807651,0.030319465,0.58994305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012665043,0.0049774903,0.4936486,0.0013937347,0.00029097125,0.0015887461,0.26962626,0.007578656,0.0059321886,0.022881508,0.19041051,0.00040482046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75221086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94814193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94714093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052859098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1196021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49849683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W857324172","doi":"","title":"Executive Fraud and Canada's Regulation of Executive Compensation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Executive functions; Executive dysfunction; Psychology; Executive branch; Compensation (psychology); Business; Accounting; Political science; Neuroscience; Cognition; Law; Social psychology; Neuropsychology; Legislature","score_opus":0.0254898273698599,"score_gpt":0.3352291434851856,"score_spread":0.30973931611532574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W857324172","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106658965,0.010409741,0.0013820801,0.5837991,0.0029711856,0.0002920081,0.00153078,0.00017562884,0.2927805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61230105,0.0042166673,0.0019002601,0.19110905,0.0014185742,0.00017977603,0.0005066343,0.00014520687,0.18822278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9491263,0.003855634,0.0015766117,0.002430101,0.022142956,0.020868463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92116505,0.022318957,0.0043135034,0.002078019,0.036117528,0.01400696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016813457,0.0006826909,0.0013871421,0.005902949,0.030091455,0.022990042,0.0062806457,0.03498845,0.012523095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074891016,0.0015695818,0.0019797122,0.0055278726,0.010441967,0.003362994,0.005419693,0.02300196,0.0008570836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027666095,0.00024932146,0.032550137,0.00030012225,0.00019197851,0.0007840136,0.007423235,0.0030555546,0.0007486563,0.5522276,0.36555976,0.036632873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005209888,0.00015652023,0.15738356,0.0012141966,0.00041556222,0.0002832259,0.007851215,0.005131672,0.0015544909,0.044355962,0.78044844,0.00068413094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99800533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24669205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24669205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5116836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8737304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W863058917","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canada: Introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.11595307671573389,"score_gpt":0.47031258667384346,"score_spread":0.35435950995810955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W863058917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014354594,0.01054082,0.017655386,0.012376327,0.0023288454,0.010121857,0.413575,0.007845055,0.5241212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057870746,0.021767823,0.07213658,0.0056477417,0.00043777443,0.0145833,0.13358523,0.0040914877,0.7419631],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99220616,0.0010140152,0.00075722823,0.00049848895,0.0048886156,0.0006354422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9162074,0.014044538,0.0013733249,0.0024833055,0.06347118,0.0024202717],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011465765,0.0013218115,0.0018345508,0.01274021,0.007311826,0.0058539524,0.0042015435,0.0021887596,0.32727805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042525727,0.0022742546,0.0010917006,0.023284853,0.001808474,0.0035215388,0.0022430175,0.0033339635,0.15631743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009912435,0.00001717701,0.00013127593,0.0005027097,0.0000024152384,0.000014034691,0.00025370962,0.00004142793,0.00007481546,0.0014541929,0.96471876,0.032779533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014302322,0.00000870014,0.0018890204,0.00067697733,0.000008030729,0.000021625767,0.00056544936,0.000044089855,0.00014356911,0.0007476588,0.99585044,0.000030280586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89163953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9614911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32727805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02930377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20099908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9595562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W8709582","doi":"10.29173/alr34","title":"Decolonizing Law School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Colonization; Decolonization; Agency (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Process (computing); Political science; Social science; Psychology; Ecology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.042240651802407235,"score_gpt":0.3898735604903233,"score_spread":0.3476329086879161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W8709582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39567032,0.008528075,0.009973037,0.112275235,0.00066436804,0.0002727885,0.00019057695,0.00029913528,0.4721265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96246386,0.0016961524,0.0013205742,0.004183059,0.000048776074,0.00002659431,0.000052306536,0.000046006935,0.030162534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906757,0.001218256,0.00012212146,0.0007883025,0.002164949,0.0050306236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911464,0.0010325124,0.0006243181,0.00069832144,0.0038462132,0.002652168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041939714,0.00028358877,0.0004092166,0.0020360104,0.025209751,0.01188582,0.0025107814,0.0032253787,0.0071472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010147592,0.00030876932,0.0005234473,0.0022833766,0.03517388,0.0058292374,0.0076629044,0.0059272973,0.0004065764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003072446,0.000083205465,0.00984325,0.00011357924,0.000009367527,0.00041966292,0.051574226,0.0010472963,0.00060400227,0.85225606,0.0150031755,0.06901545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027081263,0.0001148071,0.028097598,0.0006217243,0.000025781552,0.0002898224,0.09598291,0.00185347,0.0009939271,0.061864067,0.8100162,0.00011258569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94133806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97237533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94133806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11257481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2717282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81679124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88085452","doi":"","title":"Beyond Case Reporters: Using Newspapers to Supplement the Legal-Historical Record","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Inclusion (mineral); Law; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.030663710577035985,"score_gpt":0.36623187784697897,"score_spread":0.335568167269943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88085452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5471192,0.04351666,0.03696709,0.08501373,0.0071511646,0.0015502004,0.009600604,0.0010099282,0.2680714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89255846,0.020010876,0.04587254,0.0114158755,0.0059868637,0.000948553,0.0036998175,0.00051386893,0.018993163],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9585229,0.032165132,0.0026592705,0.001679136,0.0042854995,0.0006880059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.58677727,0.31235287,0.031805903,0.03477074,0.030121582,0.004171627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047190234,0.00047524442,0.0009821657,0.020463401,0.0030230053,0.015147834,0.0017772755,0.0016683978,0.0073840404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21812506,0.00077053806,0.0002954474,0.019119758,0.0038183772,0.019736765,0.006236656,0.0021558274,0.0022580298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048254675,0.00032960772,0.06004687,0.002696047,0.00015201617,0.0011605904,0.28617305,0.00022302673,0.0025439,0.048689026,0.051100783,0.5464026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012930622,0.00047583168,0.049400322,0.0060290094,0.00028417096,0.0012621037,0.16342065,0.001028854,0.004918613,0.024900986,0.74793696,0.00021319298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051555373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008404954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047190234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018096011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038068315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24956882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88726734","doi":"","title":"UVic Law and the Debate Over Accreditation of a New Law School at Trinity Western University","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018340034067072214,"score_gpt":0.3098548212618925,"score_spread":0.29151478719482027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88726734","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12025855,0.0033826833,0.0007172001,0.70977503,0.0031149902,0.000070795635,0.000088480876,0.00007965873,0.16251265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6794687,0.000764131,0.00065081124,0.23724733,0.0016601472,0.00013306482,0.00004950037,0.00015485448,0.07987146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9484507,0.018565226,0.002060757,0.004247882,0.008704128,0.017971337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86770076,0.07011902,0.006718355,0.0044628037,0.02145108,0.029547941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053297084,0.00031812995,0.0011445791,0.0035396365,0.049069874,0.04523616,0.0057310616,0.044080157,0.022717007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.117246315,0.001757581,0.0010395967,0.0031403315,0.041056238,0.012598288,0.020761132,0.03495186,0.0016710772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014119702,0.00018501024,0.01209687,0.00017975933,0.000044109092,0.0010515406,0.026851239,0.0003397804,0.00037588246,0.7509052,0.19106668,0.016762614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021745927,0.00033068514,0.057208102,0.002776751,0.00016451813,0.0005301837,0.10779068,0.0014580672,0.0017846368,0.105002575,0.7222598,0.00047652912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.210559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4428094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94825065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05174933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.100642875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41866684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W90589339","doi":"10.29173/alr330","title":"Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism by Terence C. Halliday, Lucien Karpik, and Malcolm M. Feeley, eds.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Mainstream; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Law; Political science; Human rights; Sociology; Civil society; Legal pluralism; Legal profession; Law and economics; Legal realism","score_opus":0.13537441581156456,"score_gpt":0.4485885072371355,"score_spread":0.31321409142557094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W90589339","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008045759,0.8629923,0.00027020418,0.056070346,0.0012674516,0.000022819959,0.000046225512,0.0000071285303,0.0712777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16097695,0.8067413,0.0005445586,0.0069211577,0.0020281402,0.000089985944,0.00014920472,0.00002136406,0.022527393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973622,0.0016170815,0.0000644304,0.00014070129,0.0005893818,0.00022620338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939804,0.0047376794,0.00033493832,0.00008262237,0.00055619713,0.00030818232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003053415,0.00042027063,0.0006996115,0.0037331937,0.0032292337,0.005850521,0.0009353189,0.0022100022,0.0048707095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006623037,0.0004229334,0.00033364692,0.009357477,0.0064216214,0.005678649,0.0017884534,0.0024520692,0.00065361895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008195536,0.00025765868,0.003796454,0.0025825612,0.000057006764,0.0003785624,0.026689129,0.00047825227,0.00018444758,0.40535086,0.4139788,0.14616433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041202708,0.000089188434,0.022057826,0.0055734986,0.000060501196,0.00031443,0.03433278,0.00018683156,0.00010149586,0.070391014,0.8668249,0.00002640199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031267393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08160075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031267393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00798325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009445926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062170804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W919743085","doi":"","title":"Restorative Justice: Reflections on Theory and Practice from within the Nova Scotia Community University Research Alliance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Alliance; Conceptualization; Sociology; Nova scotia; Economic Justice; Political science; Psychology; Law; Criminology","score_opus":0.21776419128824523,"score_gpt":0.47940503212936186,"score_spread":0.2616408408411166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W919743085","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19563931,0.02984419,0.003325553,0.6073678,0.0046350197,0.0003643101,0.00007166703,0.00008757896,0.15866452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88962203,0.011208806,0.0028915624,0.054298606,0.00057819806,0.00034261317,0.00004526107,0.00015453922,0.0408584],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95765156,0.028347626,0.0008870026,0.001491662,0.0035380528,0.008084046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91954136,0.055667505,0.0017044357,0.002196696,0.005588891,0.015301131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04317196,0.00058882986,0.0008944422,0.003088918,0.082773775,0.039662864,0.005699078,0.013491048,0.0040538777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036442526,0.0010731105,0.00074873155,0.004915224,0.06496469,0.010798428,0.026561465,0.016547456,0.0004943105],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021584514,0.00006316868,0.0010060114,0.00013062319,0.000006236422,0.0015464216,0.89916974,0.00007614868,0.00019601797,0.06651637,0.019724991,0.011542797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007083176,0.000017861288,0.001861696,0.00059239165,0.0000040789078,0.00012967372,0.8663379,0.000062102416,0.00007482128,0.004997523,0.12588413,0.000030669482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6394497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8046025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36055028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08987043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16034117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7253473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W942947213","doi":"","title":"Communal reflections on the workplace: Locating learning for the legal professional","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of South Africa; University of Waterloo; University of New England; Flinders University; University of Dhaka; University of Surrey; University of Technology Sydney; Simon Fraser University; Murdoch University; Massey University; University of Johannesburg; Central Queensland University; Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand; Australian Catholic University; University of Waikato","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Situated; Bachelor; Situated learning; Curriculum; Psychology; Pedagogy; Reflective practice; Work (physics); Legal profession; Public relations; Sociology; Medical education; Political science; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.1540286847527397,"score_gpt":0.3956027086911646,"score_spread":0.2415740239384249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W942947213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64598835,0.003566676,0.02135275,0.09986851,0.002070229,0.00015899759,0.000074794865,0.0003660146,0.22655365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96379626,0.0012369528,0.0029371397,0.0033019446,0.00030096364,0.00004401149,0.000025887974,0.00013646878,0.028220305],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98252547,0.014345138,0.00017274996,0.000470955,0.0011986868,0.00128697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98056066,0.012083118,0.0012902106,0.001454372,0.0010909438,0.0035206513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008843601,0.00047602804,0.0003549468,0.0011323366,0.015912551,0.009639054,0.0021446245,0.004213019,0.0077629127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02620258,0.0003677173,0.0004693316,0.0009873529,0.018208103,0.009180082,0.015164396,0.007810004,0.0017522031],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017219027,0.00007800839,0.0012007711,0.00007540382,0.000005110577,0.00088383286,0.9463913,0.000069130125,0.00067466864,0.0117050195,0.010159,0.0287405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045884403,0.000111229136,0.001767478,0.00018292243,0.0000057658895,0.00072085863,0.86659646,0.00014796526,0.0006519126,0.003489435,0.12629431,0.000027075866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043718736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009621508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015912551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032244944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033969756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046769977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W976796446","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Trusts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.19202299229302386,"score_gpt":0.4753388452760368,"score_spread":0.283315852983013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W976796446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038707803,0.008784635,0.0036570514,0.07457368,0.0027947614,0.0025729723,0.1406758,0.0027722272,0.7602981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024391068,0.013280374,0.014706625,0.0070516127,0.0005439625,0.0017961534,0.027823614,0.0015051635,0.90890145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99511445,0.0005285433,0.00047257106,0.0003145082,0.0027882122,0.0007816375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9516046,0.008433592,0.00094386726,0.0008678296,0.03378853,0.0043616723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006630495,0.0009959181,0.00088051055,0.012508657,0.01028468,0.012643478,0.0021233794,0.0040987455,0.2760241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038097847,0.001043454,0.0005639569,0.02356005,0.0021285505,0.005868848,0.002628603,0.00257123,0.05102877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008965634,0.000010083361,0.00025162002,0.000235408,0.0000012286414,0.000011589475,0.00049143436,0.000037055917,0.000028884038,0.0033201491,0.9779131,0.017690523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002417508,0.000008326336,0.0037226817,0.00077032985,0.000010119267,0.000015828437,0.0029395425,0.00012324865,0.00013580528,0.0018737663,0.9903385,0.00003766066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94652843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2760241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060502335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22922851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9233926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98103576","doi":"","title":"The Problem of Partisan Experts and the Potential for Reform through Concurrent Evidence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œReview of litigation","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Law; Contempt; Jury; Political science; German; Civil procedure; Competence (human resources); Ex parte; Psychology","score_opus":0.05576304141928773,"score_gpt":0.3963926964728035,"score_spread":0.3406296550535158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98103576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033561412,0.031624153,0.16303332,0.21657594,0.002000827,0.00061159773,0.00025622986,0.00023424755,0.55210227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.826274,0.011949982,0.07320081,0.024164515,0.0035405396,0.00094427937,0.00016010695,0.00011758365,0.059648186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9593791,0.026030108,0.0014951611,0.0030687347,0.008027115,0.0019999666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8734125,0.101459965,0.00418097,0.012052872,0.0076260413,0.0012675673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047125153,0.00045278174,0.0007998267,0.0026264025,0.0049986118,0.008131694,0.002708064,0.0057699,0.01023019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11636283,0.0007649755,0.0011495765,0.0021420524,0.016178703,0.014135087,0.0064849355,0.005984634,0.0011716048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012784926,0.000009954461,0.00021039929,0.00007760638,0.0000072371295,0.000052541964,0.0005406893,0.00040496816,0.000041357755,0.9803859,0.004047836,0.014208747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017528218,0.000033412332,0.00032218796,0.0003307501,0.000016049555,0.000104747014,0.00029188077,0.0019257971,0.0002508302,0.9492672,0.047426384,0.000013235513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056184856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051045385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047125153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061775898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077525396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24922454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W986005766","doi":"","title":"The time to disposition of a disciplinary matter before the College of Chiropractors of Ontario","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Europe PMC (PubMed Central)","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statute; Mandate; Discipline; Political science; Law; Agency (philosophy); Jurisdiction; Charter; Medicine; Public administration; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.022841226645958137,"score_gpt":0.27113650891618185,"score_spread":0.2482952822702237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W986005766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907059,0.00038863748,0.00046175136,0.0002983976,0.000030471547,0.00043018966,0.0016070324,0.000012419415,0.0060651833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957312,0.00043400176,0.00044920444,0.00010176055,0.000026745478,0.00020762318,0.00065720663,0.0000059652534,0.002386345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99439406,0.0005439911,0.00059340976,0.0007117251,0.0024457444,0.0013110668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97095305,0.0052832225,0.015616678,0.00076863106,0.0054739267,0.0019045528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021027294,0.00022542902,0.0002785701,0.0035877884,0.0033766963,0.0019334613,0.0012608333,0.00066142884,0.008791711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018603692,0.00044969507,0.0003283231,0.0031962,0.0014529548,0.00075398735,0.0012920457,0.00080959767,0.0006746028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028783944,0.00015051872,0.970122,0.0002378589,0.000034552475,0.0038606871,0.0064243283,0.00017411174,0.00083653734,0.0005264721,0.0018351821,0.015509911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011397551,0.00025071556,0.98104423,0.00013457683,0.000030722953,0.0020964947,0.009943246,0.00016881293,0.00046872452,0.00007115194,0.005756749,0.000023229371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29274857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42485228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015959354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018328886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5820892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W987081371","doi":"","title":"L’ÉDUCATION ÉTHIQUE AU SEIN DU PROGRAMME QUÉBÉCOIS DE FORMATION : UNE ÉDUCATION TRANSVERSALE ? / ETHICS EDUCATION WITHIN THE QUÉBEC EDUCATION PROGRAM: A CROSS-CURRICULAR EDUCATION?","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2819742263207641,"score_gpt":0.4796161182771318,"score_spread":0.19764189195636772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W987081371","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19960313,0.024138898,0.015022584,0.45544732,0.002500851,0.00048007086,0.00023883136,0.00026714284,0.30230123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.846532,0.0059952945,0.0088134715,0.020467658,0.00023615138,0.00018571387,0.00014200418,0.00008726742,0.117540404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957129,0.001303763,0.00009373537,0.0002871096,0.0010943109,0.0015082053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884356,0.0021444543,0.0005396831,0.0006052638,0.002989607,0.005285371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008598057,0.00041709805,0.0003680189,0.0012782551,0.008331097,0.0063176113,0.0012446003,0.0030125955,0.009902195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008890944,0.00039811913,0.00034415151,0.0014896175,0.010557122,0.0044586374,0.003758217,0.0057061184,0.00054209353],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009728489,0.0006432647,0.026260927,0.0006804523,0.00005092162,0.00091840606,0.10291568,0.0011490438,0.003144896,0.36438027,0.1374741,0.36228472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036776284,0.0001505665,0.07971428,0.0014256947,0.000021999824,0.00032589704,0.048380118,0.0007909739,0.0014545573,0.0131996805,0.85439783,0.00010163849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8260688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91678303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17393118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05997869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18024786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43517792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W994092659","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Intellectual Property","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law; Property (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22748569818869813,"score_gpt":0.45181196536214685,"score_spread":0.22432626717344872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W994092659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026963942,0.00858284,0.0030771394,0.051245954,0.002325719,0.0021849745,0.15489523,0.0024214599,0.77257025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016609577,0.013011618,0.0129467575,0.0054909154,0.00045577993,0.0015379135,0.03324588,0.0012905325,0.91541106],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99416924,0.00050913,0.00048691058,0.00039732188,0.0036023143,0.0008350556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481609,0.007392908,0.0008908535,0.00086697884,0.03887267,0.00381562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071479953,0.0012055781,0.0010042164,0.01732099,0.011099621,0.014152765,0.00237811,0.0040288484,0.28353372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034002174,0.0009787197,0.00061335554,0.02978244,0.0024209437,0.0057181343,0.0026914058,0.0028192864,0.05738516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114673685,0.000013319784,0.00025115625,0.00029711245,0.0000016171681,0.000012553562,0.00043726695,0.000043192205,0.00004242492,0.004037303,0.97047555,0.024377042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021653732,0.000007723969,0.0035001053,0.0006859026,0.000010536412,0.000012746312,0.0020783432,0.00010004804,0.00016582072,0.0017151989,0.99167013,0.000031724252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9567451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9855479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28353372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06606744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2580433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9485148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}